summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--35639-8.txt6802
-rw-r--r--35639-8.zipbin0 -> 112693 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h.zipbin0 -> 293788 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h/35639-h.htm6930
-rw-r--r--35639-h/images/cover.jpgbin0 -> 126866 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h/images/fig1.jpgbin0 -> 14200 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h/images/fig2.jpgbin0 -> 13507 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h/images/fig3.jpgbin0 -> 11209 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639-h/images/title.jpgbin0 -> 12049 bytes
-rw-r--r--35639.txt6802
-rw-r--r--35639.zipbin0 -> 112610 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
14 files changed, 20550 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/35639-8.txt b/35639-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..046c28d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6802 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Schweigger on Squint
+ A Monograph by Dr. C. Schweigger
+
+Author: C. Schweigger
+
+Editor: Gustavus Hartridge
+
+Translator: Emily J. Robinson
+
+Release Date: March 20, 2011 [EBook #35639]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON SQUINT
+
+A MONOGRAPH
+
+BY
+
+DR. C. SCHWEIGGER,
+
+PROFESSOR OF OPHTHALMOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN
+
+TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN
+
+BY
+
+EMILY J. ROBINSON
+
+EDITED BY
+
+GUSTAVUS HARTRIDGE, F.R.C.S.
+
+LONDON
+J. & A. CHURCHILL
+11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET
+1887
+
+
+
+
+TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE
+
+
+The subject of Squint is so interesting that we venture to think an
+English rendering of this exhaustive monograph will be acceptable to
+many ophthalmic surgeons and students.
+
+While adhering as far as possible to the spirit and style of the
+original we have not hesitated here and there to give a somewhat free
+translation. This has been partly necessitated by the difficulty of
+finding an exact equivalent in English for all the terms used in the
+original text.
+
+In the German Edition the old system of inches is used. We have (with
+the consent of the author) altered these to the dioptric system.
+
+ E. J. R.
+ G. H.
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+_Amicus Plato, amicus Socrates, magis amica veritas._ May my friends and
+colleagues, whose views differ from mine, read the following
+observations without prejudice. A fact, which does not agree with the
+system, is generally worth more than theory, still it is very difficult
+for even the most important fact to find recognition if it contradicts
+received opinion. For theories and dogmas are narcotics, which are
+necessary to men; some flatter themselves by composing them, while
+others content themselves by satisfying their own craving for a creed.
+Reasonably applied, they may be useful, but the boundary line is only
+too easily over-stepped. It is the task of science to observe also
+whether theories correspond with the progress of facts. The present
+reigning theory on strabismus will have to submit to various
+limitations; on the other hand, we are ready to leave to the scholastic
+science of medicine and its followers certain dogmas which remain
+unproved and which have nothing but the fact of their existence to
+recommend them.
+
+The small compass of the following treatise proves that it was not
+intended to exhaust the rich literature on the subject; I have only
+referred to the same where it appeared to me necessary for the interest
+of the work in hand.
+
+Above all, it has been my endeavour to treat the subject of this
+treatise (which occurs so frequently in practice) in a way intelligible
+to every physician, at the same time, however, to bring sufficiently
+into notice those facts and views which are of value to my special
+colleagues.
+
+ C. SCHWEIGGER.
+
+ BERLIN.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX TO CONTENTS.
+
+
+INTRODUCTION. PAGES
+
+Ordinary use of the word squint and its meaning. Apparent
+squint. Paralytic and typical squint. Law of association.
+Squint angle and linear measure of the deviation.
+Permanent, periodic, latent, monolateral, and alternating
+squint 1-8
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+Donders' theory and the test of it by statistics. Limits
+of error in the subjective and objective determination of
+hypermetropia. Statistics of convergent squint. Hypermetropia
+and favouring circumstances. Participation
+of the accommodation. Preponderance of the interni
+and insufficiency of the externi. Nebulæ of the cornea. 9-26
+
+PERIODIC CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+In myopia, emmetropia, and hypermetropia. Intermittent
+squint. Accommodative squint 27-35
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT IN MYOPIA 36-38
+
+SQUINT FROM PARALYSIS OF THE ABDUCENS 39-40
+
+HYSTERICAL SQUINT 41-43
+
+DIVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+Absolute and relative divergence. Statistics of divergent
+squint. Causes 44-49
+
+DYNAMIC SQUINT, INSUFFICIENCY OF THE INTERNI AND
+MUSCULAR ASTHENOPIA.
+
+Diplopia and power of overcoming prisms. Facultative
+divergence. Dynamic absolute divergence. Parallel
+strabismus. Relative divergence in myopia. Muscular
+asthenopia. Dynamic relative divergence. Treatment
+of muscular asthenopia 50-63
+
+BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT.
+
+Single vision in squint. Theory of exclusion. Forms of
+binocular vision in squint 64-74
+
+VISUAL ACUTENESS OF THE SQUINTING EYE.
+
+The trial of vision and its results. Appearance, diagnosis.
+Peculiarities and statistics of congenital defective vision.
+Relation of the same to defective vision in squint 75-104
+
+CURE OF SQUINT.
+
+Spontaneous cure. Voluntary loss of the habit. Cure of
+convergent squint by means of convex glasses. Strabotomy.
+Tenotomy. Advancement. Result of the
+operation and choice of methods. After-treatment by
+means of influence on the ocular muscles and on the
+accommodation. Aim of more extended results of the
+operation. Artificial strabismus. Operation for periodic
+convergent squint. Strabotomy in homonymous diplopia.
+Operation for squint after paralysis of the abducens.
+Operation for divergent squint and for periodic divergence.
+Degree of the result of the operation. Determination
+on the age best suited for operation 105-141
+
+
+
+
+SQUINT
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+
+By squinting, in the German vocabulary, is understood every oblique
+direction of the visual axes. We prefer that the eyes which turn towards
+us should do so in a straight line, and feel it to be something ugly and
+out of harmony, if anyone squints at us. Æsthetic feeling is, however,
+too individual and uncertain a guide to be laid down as a foundation for
+the decision of questions of medicine. Parents have repeatedly brought
+to me children said to squint, when frequent and careful examination of
+them showed normal position of the eyes and perfect binocular vision;
+the over-anxious parents had taken mere physiological convergence or
+side glances for squinting.
+
+On the other hand, cases appear in which such a strong semblance of
+squinting is present, that at the first glance one cannot say whether
+absolute fixation takes place or not. A very simple examination suffices
+to determine these doubts:--Cause the patient to gaze at a certain point
+on the horizon and cover first one eye and then the other. If the
+covered eye remains stationary, no squint exists, but if it is observed
+that when giving one eye its freedom and covering the other, the first
+must make a movement in order to fix the object to be looked at, it is
+only a question of discovering whether the squint does not simply ensue
+from the covering up of the eye. We will return to these cases at
+greater length, in order to occupy ourselves now with the fact, that the
+examination above referred to proves the non-existence of strabismus,
+while appearance still allows us to suspect its existence.
+
+This apparent contradiction finds its explanation in the fact that the
+scientific notion of squinting is determined by the direction of the
+visual axes. Strabismus is present when one eye only is directed to the
+fixed point, while the visual line of the other eye deviates from it.
+
+But we cannot see the direction of the visual line, we can only judge of
+it from the position of the cornea. It is exactly that line which joins
+the point fixed with the centre of the fovea centralis. We can determine
+the position of the cornea by a perpendicular line passing through the
+centre of the cornea; this does not coincide with the visual line but
+deviates from it about 5° outwards. In the case of parallel lines of
+vision the corneæ are directed slightly outwards, a position which we
+are accustomed to consider as the normal one. If the angle formed by the
+above-mentioned perpendicular and the visual line is larger than usual,
+_i. e._ if the corneæ move further outwards than usual, the unusual
+appearance strikes us, and gives us the impression of a divergent
+squint. The enlargement of this angle, which is usually indicated as
+Angle a, is a peculiarity of the hypermetropic eye; and where we have an
+apparent divergent squint we may expect to find also hypermetropia,
+while an apparent convergent squint occurs occasionally in myopia of
+high degree.
+
+If we turn now to those cases in which a real deviation of the visual
+line occurs, we must first consider the cause, and afterwards
+distinguish it from paralysis of the ocular muscles. The faulty position
+may be constantly present or it may only occur when the paralysed muscle
+is called into action. It is almost invariably combined with double
+vision; sometimes the latter is the prevailing symptom, whilst the
+faulty position of the eye is in no way obtrusive, and can only be
+proved by careful investigation.
+
+In contrast to paralysis of the ocular muscles stands the typical
+concomitant squint, in which the squinting eye normally accompanies the
+movements of the other. Transitional forms may thus be brought about, in
+some of which the paralysis recovers, with complete or almost complete
+restoration of movement, but with continuance of the squint. On the
+other hand, in concomitant strabismus, restriction of movement towards
+the opposite side not unfrequently develops itself.
+
+This impairment of movement has its origin generally in a want of use.
+Those who squint have less need for movement, since one of their eyes is
+already directed obliquely. In divergent strabismus this is apparent,
+but in convergent strabismus the squinting eye governs the field of
+vision on the side to which it turns. When the fixing eye is turned
+towards the side of the squinting eye in convergent strabismus, the
+latter, it is true, makes a concomitant movement, which does not,
+however, bring it by a long way to the limit of the movement of which it
+is capable. The defect of motion is therefore generally present in both
+eyes, and is usually most marked in the squinting eye. Often, indeed,
+there is present at the same time a congenital or acquired insufficiency
+of the antagonistic muscle, but that want of use has also much to do
+with it, is shown by the improvement of mobility that often follows even
+short practice.
+
+From the law of equal innervation, which governs the movements of the
+eyes, it follows that the fixing eye lapses into the associated
+deviation as soon as the squinting eye is directed straight forwards.
+If, for example, a convergent squinting eye is put into fixation, an
+innervation of the external rectus, with which just as strong an
+associated contraction of the internal rectus of the other eye, is
+called forth; the direction of the squint then, as well as the degree of
+deviation, is transferred from one eye to the other. It is naturally the
+same with divergent squint.
+
+Squinting upwards or downwards seldom occurs as a symptom by itself;
+more frequently it is associated with convergent or divergent squint.
+
+According to the law of associated movements, when an eye squinting
+upwards is put into fixation, the other eye should make a movement
+downwards, as normally both eyes move together up and down, yet this is
+not always the case. For example, when an upward deviation is present in
+convergent squint, it not uncommonly follows that the secondary
+deviation of the eye which usually fixes is also inwards and upwards;
+only exceptionally in cases of deviation in height of the squinting eye
+does the sympathetic movement take place without change of height.
+Sometimes with deviation of height, I found combined a distinct rotation
+of the eye, generally thus, that together with the movement upwards was
+combined a rotation of the vertical meridian outwards and _vice versâ_;
+in fixing the eye a rolling inwards was combined with the movement
+downwards. The other eye then usually showed a similar rotation (thus
+the meridian of both eyes rotated simultaneously to the right or left),
+but the deviation in height was not always the same.
+
+The law of equal innervation requires in alternate fixation, first with
+one eye, then with the other, that the same degree of deviation be
+transferred to the non-fixing eye. When exceptions appear, and the
+deviation in the two eyes is unequal, it is (provided the inequality has
+not been caused by attempted operation, or is the result of paralysis),
+usually to be explained by the fact, that an accommodative movement
+takes place when we are expecting an associated one. For example, if
+there is convergent squint and hypermetropia in both eyes, but more
+hypermetropia in one than the other, in alternate fixation it will be
+found that the least hypermetropic eye always undergoes the greatest
+deviation, because in fixation with the more hypermetropic eye a
+stronger effort of accommodation unites itself with a corresponding
+innervation of the internal rectus, which is transferred equally to the
+other and non-fixing eye. Thus it happens frequently in divergent
+strabismus, when one eye is myopic, the other emmetropic. If the latter
+fixes an object stationed near the "far point" of the myopic eye, the
+internal recti and the accommodation act simultaneously; on the other
+hand if the myopic eye fixes, it wants no accommodation and the
+emmetropic eye sinks into divergence.
+
+With regard to the immutability of the squint; it must not be understood
+that the squint angle always remains the same with the same individual;
+in most cases the amount of deviation varies, the squint is now less,
+now greater; it is desirable however, to know the bounds within which it
+fluctuates.
+
+To determine the degree of the squint one can either ascertain the angle
+of the squint, or use v. Graefe's so-called linear measure of deviation.
+
+The squint angle is that angle, which the visual line of the squinting
+eye encloses with the direction it ought normally to take--it may be
+measured with the aid of a perimeter. The patient's head is so placed by
+means of a chin rest, that the axis of the squinting eye is in the
+centre of the arc of the perimeter; a distant point in the centre of the
+field of vision is fixed. Behind the patient is a candle, the reflection
+of which is thrown into the squinting eye by means of a plane mirror;
+now slide the mirror along the arc of the perimeter, till the reflection
+on the cornea stands in the centre of the pupil of the eye which is
+under observation. The point which the mirror occupies on the arc of the
+perimeter, indicates the squint angle. In deviation in height of the
+squinting eye, bring the arc of the perimeter into the corresponding
+direction and so measure at the same time the degree of deviation in
+height. Were the method more exact than it is, one would be able to
+measure the angle formed by the visual line and the axis of the cornea.
+
+To find the linear measure of the deviation, cover the fixing eye and
+allow the squinting eye to fix. Hold a millimetre measure close to the
+under lid, so that a chosen portion of it stands under the centre of the
+pupil; uncover the other eye and when the squinting eye returns to its
+deviation, it can be seen over which point the centre of the pupil
+stands, and the linear measure of the deviation is thus obtained. The
+secondary deviation of the other eye is measured of course in the same
+way. If, in consequence of amblyopia, the squinting eye possesses no
+certain fixation, the measure may be so held that the _nil_ point of the
+division coincides with the lower punctum, and then in unchanged
+fixation the portion lying under the centre of the pupil is determined,
+first in the sound and then in the squinting eye.
+
+The execution of one or other of these forms of measurement is in every
+case to be recommended, and if their exactness is not as perfect as can
+be desired, still, on the other hand it should be remembered, that for
+surgical treatment, an exact measurement of the deviation does not
+possess the importance sometimes assigned to it, as in most cases the
+squint angle shows considerable variations.
+
+In a large number of cases these variations are so great, that a correct
+position of the eyes alternates with a more or less considerable squint,
+which as the case may be, appears seldom or often, sometimes only under
+certain conditions, and sometimes quite unexpectedly (periodic squint).
+In some cases stationary or permanent squint begins with the periodic
+form, however, one must not conclude that periodic squint is invariably
+the precursor of the permanent form. In by far the greater number of
+cases periodic squint continues unchanged without ever becoming
+permanent.
+
+The transition from squint to the normal condition is formed by those
+cases, in which the proper position of the eyes is maintained by a
+desire for binocular single vision, while the elastic tensions of the
+muscles are such, that squinting sets in as soon as binocular single
+vision is rendered impossible (latent squint).
+
+The squint is generally one sided (monolateral), for the eyes in this
+case are usually of unequal value, and the best is always preferred for
+use. The eye which has the acuter vision is always made use of when
+something has to be carefully observed. But when the acuteness of vision
+is equal, and one eye is emmetropic and the other hypermetropic, or if
+both are hypermetropic but in varying degree, the most hypermetropic eye
+is always the squinting one; for with a greater power of accommodation
+it does not accomplish more than the emmetropic or less hypermetropic
+one with slighter expenditure of strength. Why should a man strain his
+accommodation when no advantage is thereby gained?
+
+In most cases the squinting eye has also an available power of vision
+and is on that account used for fixing objects which lie in the
+direction of its visual axis; it can also be made to fix objects in
+front, this occurs as soon as the other eye is covered; it remains as
+the fixing eye till the next blinking of the lids, or movement to
+another object for fixation, or till both eyes are closed for a short
+time, when it returns to its former deviation.
+
+A true alternating strabismus, _i. e._ alternate use of first one eye
+and then the other to fix objects straight ahead, only occurs when both
+eyes are of equal value as regards weakness and acuteness of vision, or
+when one is more conveniently used for near, and the other for distant
+vision. In these circumstances one eye is always short-sighted and is
+used for near objects, while the other is emmetropic (or in less degree
+near-sighted or long-sighted) and is preferred for distant things. The
+reason for the alternation lies in the necessity for the act of vision
+itself; it begins regularly whenever distant and near objects are
+alternately fixed. Alternating squint is usually divergent, with short
+sight on one side, still convergent strabismus may occur under these
+conditions.
+
+
+
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT
+
+
+To Donders belongs the merit of having pointed out the presence of
+hypermetropia in about two thirds of all cases of convergent strabismus.
+The fact is undeniable, the theories built upon it are doubtful. Donders
+declares no other conclusion to be possible, than this, that the
+hypermetropia is the cause of the squint. "To see clearly, the
+hypermetrope must accommodate vigorously for each distance. In looking
+even at distant objects he must overcome his hypermetropia by exerting
+his accommodation, and in proportion as the object approaches him, he
+must add to it as much accommodation as the normal emmetropic eye would
+use. The inspection of near objects requires then a special amount of
+exertion. There exists, however, a certain connection between
+accommodation and convergence of the visual lines. The stronger one
+converges the more one has to put into action the accommodation. A
+certain tendency to convergence cannot then be absent during any effort
+of the faculty of accommodation."
+
+Right as these conclusions may appear, and as they really are, as far as
+emmetropia is concerned, they leave out of sight the fact, that the
+connection between accommodation and convergence is an individual and
+acquired one. The weak side of the theory lies in the fact, that that
+relation between accommodation and convergence which is developed in
+emmetropia in consequence of daily practice, is given as being in itself
+normal and the one for all conditions of refraction. The relation
+between accommodation and convergence depends on the state of
+refraction, and alters with any of its changes in the course of life. In
+proportion as myopia is gradually developed in originally existing
+emmetropia, myopes learn to converge to the neighbourhood of their far
+point without allowing their accommodation to come into action. With
+hypermetropia it is just the contrary. By far the greater number of
+hypermetropes learn to use their accommodation without difficulty, even
+with parallel lines of vision, for they see distant objects clearly,
+while they neutralise their hypermetropia by accommodation, without
+sacrificing the parallelism of the visual lines.
+
+It is important to notice that Donders' theory makes convergent squint
+appear as almost a necessary consequence of hypermetropia. According to
+Donders, hypermetropes have to choose between the advantages of
+binocular vision with an effort of accommodation corresponding to the
+hypermetropia, and relief to the accommodation by too strong convergence
+with the sacrifice of binocular fixation; and the decision will tend to
+the latter condition, if circumstances exist which deprecate the value
+of binocular vision.
+
+The demand for binocular fusion of the retinal images will be greater if
+both eyes are of equal value; on the contrary it will be less, if the
+retinal image or the visual acuteness of one eye is less perfect than
+that of the other. Varieties of weakness; when one eye always receives a
+clear retinal image, the other an indistinct one; lowering of the visual
+acuteness of one eye by nebulæ, astigmatism or any other cause.
+According to Donders all these furnish a reason why, in existing
+hypermetropia, binocular fixation should be abandoned and convergent
+strabismus developed.
+
+It cannot be denied that the relation existing between convergent
+strabismus and hypermetropia may be as Donders represents it; the only
+question is, whether it really is so. A theory may appear very
+acceptable, and may rest on a firm physiological basis; it will,
+however, be more perfect if it answers to facts. Physiological
+possibility is not always pathological reality, for other unusual causes
+besides physiological ones acquire value, and so things become
+pathological. If Donders' theory is right, convergent strabismus must
+really begin, as soon as double hypermetropia meets with causes which
+depreciate the value of binocular vision. The theory may be tested then
+by statistics, which confront the cases of hypermetropia and convergent
+strabismus with those cases in which hypermetropia meets with Donders'
+conditions and normal binocular vision still remains.
+
+The statistics, which I have collected, relate to all the cases which
+have appeared in my private practice during the last ten years. The
+number would be much more considerable if I had included the patients of
+the University Clinic; however, the reliability of the single elements
+of which the statistics are composed was to me more important than the
+number. In my private practice I have myself examined every case with
+reference to these statistics for at least five years.
+
+In a large clinic, where more than 5000 new patients annually come under
+treatment, one must frequently content oneself by satisfying the demands
+of the moment; thus the sources of inaccuracy in the statistics would be
+augmented.
+
+Included in the statistics were not merely the cases which came under
+treatment for squint, but all in which squinting was present or those in
+which it could be objectively proved (for example, by scars left by
+previous operations for squint), that squint had formerly existed.
+
+Further, in the following statistics, only those cases were included,
+where an exact determination of the amount of error was possible; in
+most cases this was also verified objectively with the ophthalmoscope.
+In many cases, especially in children, the objective determination of
+refraction alone is possible, and is practicable only with the greatest
+difficulty and by the use of atropine.
+
+Those cases deserve particular mention, in which it remained doubtful
+whether hypermetropia of slight degree or emmetropia was present. Even
+in full visual acuteness it is not unusual that with weak convex glasses
+(of less than a dioptre) binocular vision is just as clear as with the
+naked eyes, while in monocular investigation convex glasses cause a
+slight indistinctness of vision. Are we to recognise hypermetropia here
+or not? Opposed to the objection that in covering one eye the
+hypermetropia is more easily neutralised by accommodation, stands the
+observation that binocular is, as a rule, clearer than monocular vision,
+wherefore, in the usual method for testing the sight, unless special
+precautions are taken, full binocular visual acuteness does not prove
+the presence of absolutely distinct retinal images. These doubts arise
+much oftener in lowered visual acuteness. All conclusions which we
+derive from visual acuteness become very inexact as soon as it is
+lowered. In such cases, in determining anomalies of refraction we are
+accustomed to consider the strongest convex--relatively, the weakest
+concave glass, with which the visual acuteness individually present is
+reached, as the most correct expression of the hypermetropia or myopia,
+and with good reason if it is a case of ordering spectacles, as all
+sources of error in the method of examination are then avoided as far as
+possible; but it is quite another question if in such cases an exact
+measurement of the amount of error is required solely for diagnostic
+purposes; investigation with the ophthalmoscope is then alone decisive
+and furnishes proof at the same time of how unreliable the determination
+of the error by testing the vision is, in cases of short sight. One can
+realise this most readily in cases of myopia with congenital amblyopia;
+one gets frequently with the most exact correction possible of the
+objectively determined myopia no better visual acuteness than with a
+very imperfect one. In one case, for instance, which I have repeatedly
+examined in the course of years, the degree of myopia determinable by
+means of the ophthalmoscope amounted to at least 6·5 D., while the
+weakest concave glass with which the full visual acuteness of 5/24 was
+attainable was 2·5 D. Under these circumstances, if one relies merely on
+the trial of vision, the degree of myopia appears too small, that of the
+hypermetropia, on the contrary, just as much too great.
+
+But even the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction has its limits of
+error. It is a question of determining the conditions under which the
+image of the fundus of the eye still appears distinct. We will except
+those circumstances which prevent our obtaining a clear erect image of
+the fundus of the eye, as, for example, high degrees of astigmatism,
+nebulæ, &c.--even under normal circumstances the fundus of the eye does
+not always present such sharply-defined lines, that one could form a
+perfectly safe opinion from the clearness of the image.
+
+When we call the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction objective, we
+only mean to say that we count the subjective opinion of the patient to
+be of less value, than that of the physician who examines him. The
+determination of the glass even, with which we believe we are able
+distinctly to see the fundus of the eye, is also an objective one.
+Whoever, for instance, is firmly convinced that convergent strabismus
+depends on hypermetropia, will, in doubtful cases, very easily carry his
+subjective conviction into the objective examination, and will still see
+clearly the fundus of even an emmetropic eye with a weak convex
+glass--the objective signs for the clearness of the image have no
+absolutely defined limits. But apart from this, other sources of error
+are possible. A person using the ophthalmoscope, for instance, who,
+without knowing it--and such a thing may happen--possesses a slight
+degree of latent hypermetropia, will find his own hypermetropia
+everywhere, just also as a myope, who deceives himself slightly about
+the degree of his myopia in the calculation of the ophthalmoscopic
+diagnosis of refraction, lays rather too high a value on his own myopia.
+
+Finally it must be added, that if the ophthalmoscopic estimation of
+refraction is to be exact, mydriasis by atropine is required, when, as
+is known, even emmetropic eyes may show a slight degree of
+hypermetropia. Enough, we must not over-rate the value of the objective
+determination of the error of refraction, and I would estimate the limit
+of error at half a dioptre at least. If the examination is rendered more
+difficult, as is frequently the case with children, by a restless and
+impatient demeanour of the patient, even the objective diagnosis may
+afford very doubtful results; such cases were, of course, excluded from
+the statistics. Moreover, ophthalmoscopic determination of the error in
+convergent strabismus is specially difficult, for one cannot advise the
+patient as to a suitable direction for the eye not under investigation.
+It is generally best to keep the eye not under investigation closed.
+
+In practice it is immaterial whether emmetropia or a minimum degree of
+hypermetropia is present; for statistics essentially devoted to
+theoretical questions it seemed more suitable to unite these cases in a
+separate group.
+
+Accurately taken, the statistics should give the condition of refraction
+at the age at which the squint begins. But, if there is a thankless
+task, it is that of examining the erect image in children from two to
+three years of age. To furnish accurate results this method requires a
+certain tractability on the patient's side, which is never present at
+this age, and not always in adults. A number of the cases surveyed in
+the following table also came under observation long after the squint
+commenced, and in some short-sighted persons in particular, the degree
+of myopia at the time when squinting began, may have been less than it
+was at the time of the examination.
+
+Further, it seemed to me desirable to keep periodic, separate from
+permanent squint; this, however, could not be accomplished with
+exactness. It may easily happen that children with periodic squint
+always squint just when one sees them, and in those cases which had
+already been operated on when they came to be examined, it was quite
+impossible to determine whether periodic or permanent squint had
+formerly been present. Therefore I have represented separately in each
+particular group the number of those previously operated on.
+
+In the following table the refraction of the fixing eye and the visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye are given. In alternating squint the
+refraction of the emmetropic eye was taken, as determining it for
+insertion in the lower division of the statistics.
+
+A. Convergent squint with myopia:
+ 1. Slight myopia to M. = 1·75 D.
+ (_a_) Permanent squint 11 cases (3 previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases (one with M.
+ 1·25 D. of the fixing, M. 4 D. of the squinting eye;
+ the other with M. 1·25 D. of the fixing, H. 4 D. and
+ V. = 1 of the squinting eye). The examination of
+ the visual acuteness of the squinting eye showed:
+ V. more than 1/7 4 cases.
+ V. 1/12 - 1/18 1 case.
+ V. 1/24 - 1/36 1 case.
+ V. Less than 1/36 4 cases (among them
+ one with H. 2 D.
+ in the squinting eye.)
+ V. indeterminable 1 case.
+
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 2 cases with very slight anisometropia
+ and good vision.
+ 2. M. 2 D. to M. 3 D. 11 cases, all permanent (6 cases
+ previously operated on), anisometropia with
+ good vision in both eyes in 2 cases (in both, the
+ less myopic eye squints). V. of the squinting
+ eye more than 1/7 in 6 cases.
+ V. 1/12 - 1/18 1 case.
+ V. 1/24 - 1/36 2 cases.
+ V. less than 1/36 2 cases (one with H = 5 D).
+ 3. M. 3·5 D. to 6 D.
+ (_a_) Permanent 11 cases (one previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases, of which one consisted
+ of alternating squint, while the other possessed
+ in the fixing eye M. 4 D., in the squinting one M. 7·5
+ D. with good vision on both sides.
+ V. more than 1/7 7 cases.
+ V. 1/24 1 case.
+ V. 1/36 1 case (in fixation with this
+ eye; the visual axis shows a linear deviation of 2 mm.
+ The presence of emmetropia is detected with the ophthalmoscope).
+ Two cases were excluded from the statistics of vision, one on
+ account of congenital capsular cataract, covering almost the
+ whole pupil area, the other on account of choroiditis of the
+ macula lutea.
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 4 cases with good vision,
+ anisometropia in 2 cases.
+ 4. M. 6·5 D. and more.
+ (_a_) Permanent 11 cases, among them 9 with V.
+ more than 1/7, 2 excluded from the statistics, one on
+ account of complication with corneal nebulæ, cataract,
+ &c., the other possessed in the fixing eye M. 6·5 D.
+ V. = 10/70 and slight nystagmus, in the squinting eye
+ a smaller amount of sight not accurately noted, and
+ strong nystagmus in fixing with this eye.
+ (_b_) Periodic squint in 4 cases with good vision.
+ 5. Myopia with nystagmus and congenital amblyopia
+ on both sides, 2 cases (not included in the
+ statistics of vision). Altogether 56 cases, among
+ them 10 with periodic squint.
+
+B. Convergent squint in emmetropia, including simple
+ myopic astigmatism, 98 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 81 cases (13 previously operated
+ on). Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in 44 cases. V.
+ less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 6 cases; V. less than 1/12 to
+ V. = 1/36 20 cases; V. less than 1/36 7. Excluded from
+ statistics of vision 4 (3 on account of complications,
+ 1 on account of lack of accurate information).
+ (_b_) Alternating convergent squint with emmetropia
+ in one, myopia in the other eye, 4 cases. The degree
+ of the myopia was 3·75 D., 5 D., 6 D., 12 D.
+ Vision good on both sides.
+ (_c_) Periodic squint 13 cases (in 6 of them the
+ refraction was objectively and subjectively determined
+ in mydriasis by atropine). No anisometropia worth
+ mentioning was present in any of these cases. Visual
+ acuteness more than 1/7 9 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 2. V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; one case with choroiditis
+ excluded.
+
+C. Convergent squint with doubtful hypermetropia to
+ H. = 1 D., including simple hypermetropic astigmatism,
+ 38 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 30 cases (5 previously operated on).
+ Visual acuteness more than 1/7 7 cases. V < 1/7 to
+ V. = 1/12 2. V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 5. V. < 1/36 2 cases.
+ 4 excluded (3 complicated with cataract, one on
+ account of impossibility of a trial of vision).
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 7.
+ V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case.
+
+D. Hypermetropia 1 D. to 1·5 D. 37 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 23 (4 cases previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 13, V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3. V. < 1/12
+ to V. = 1/36 3. V. < 1/36 3. One case excluded
+ (choroiditis of the macula lutea).
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 14 cases. V. more than 1/7 12.
+ V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1 case. One excluded on account
+ of choroiditis.
+
+E. Hypermetropia 1·5 D. to 2 D. 61 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 41 (3 previously operated on). V.
+ more than 1/7 26 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3;
+ V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. < 1/36 2; (7 cases excluded,
+ 2 as complicated, 5 on account of the impossibility of
+ testing the vision).
+ (_b_) Periodic 20 cases. V. more than 1/7 16; V.
+ < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. < 1/12 to 1/36 1; V. < 1/36 1
+ case.
+
+F. Hypermetropia 2 D. to 3 D. 88 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 58 cases. V. more than 1/7 26 cases;
+ V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 5 cases (among them one with V.
+ = 1/12 in both eyes); V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 17; V.
+ < 1/36 4 cases. Six cases excluded as indeterminable.
+ (_b_) Periodic 30 cases. V. to 1/7 24; V < 1/7 to V.
+ = 1/12 3; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; V < 1/36 1. One case
+ excluded as indeterminable.
+
+G. Hypermetropia 3 D. to 4·5 D. 54 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 35 cases (9 previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 18 cases; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case;
+ V. < 1/12 to 1/36 9; 7 cases excluded.
+ (_b_) Periodic 19 cases. V. more than 1/7 14; V.
+ < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. < 1/36
+ 1 case.
+
+H. H. 5 D. and more, 16 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 9; V. to 1/7 3; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 3; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 2; V. < 1/36 1 case.
+ (_b_) Periodic 7; V. to 1/7 4; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3
+ cases.
+
+
+_Table of Refraction and Acuity of Vision in Convergent Strabismus._
+
+[Transcriber's note: Key created to make table fit page]
+
+KEY:
+A: Permanent
+B: V. to 1/7.
+C: V. < 1/7 to V 1/12.
+D: V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+E: V. < 1/36.
+F: Excluded.
+G: Periodic.
+H: V. to 1/7.
+I: V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12.
+J: V. < 1/12. to V. 1/36.
+K: V. < 1/36.
+L: Excluded.
+
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+ Convergent | | | | | | | | | | | |
+ strabismus. | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |K | L
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+Myopia | 44| 26 | 2| 4 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 10 | -- | -- | -- | --
+Emmetropia | 85| 48 | 6| 20 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 1 | -- | 1
+H ? to H. 1 D. | 30| 17 | 2| 5 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+H. 1 D. to H. 1·5 D.| 23| 13 | 3| 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 12 | -- | 1 | -- | 1
+H. 1·5 D. to H. 2 D.| 41| 26 | 3| 3 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | --
+H. 2 D. to H. 3 D. | 58| 26 | 5| 17 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1
+H. 3 D. to H. 4·5 D.| 35| 18 | 1| 9 | -- | 7 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 | --
+H. 5 D. and more | 9| 3 | 3| 2 | 1 | -- | 7 | 4 | 3 | -- | -- | --
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+ |325|177 | 25| 63 | 26 | 34 |121 | 96 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 3
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+
+According to this the percentage of the hypermetropia (including
+doubtful cases) amounts to 66 per cent. Dr. Isler in his dissertation,
+'The Dependence of Strabismus on Refraction,' gives the percentage of
+hypermetropia in convergent squint as 88 per cent.--a great difference,
+which can, however, be partly accounted for. Isler found in
+hypermetropia of 2 to 10 dioptres squinting in 75 per cent.; in my
+statistics H. 1·5 D. to the highest degrees of hypermetropia are
+likewise represented by 75 per cent. As the difference between H. 2 D.
+and H. 1·5 D. amounts to only half a dioptre, the results of the
+statistics agree perfectly within these limits; the difference lies only
+in the slighter degrees of hypermetropia, for the diagnosis of which
+refer to pp. 12 to 14.
+
+The influence of hypermetropia is very apparent in the percentage of
+periodic squint. While in myopia, emmetropia, and slight hypermetropia,
+the sum total of permanent as compared to periodic squint is as 100:
+19·5, this number mounts in hypermetropia of 1 D. to H. = 3 D. to 52·5
+and in the higher degrees to 59 per cent. Despite the small number of
+cases it is probably no mere accident that in the highest degrees (of H.
+= 5 D. and more) this percentage is calculated at 77·7.
+
+But just this undoubted favouring of periodic squint by hypermetropia,
+helps to show that this condition is one of the causes of squint, but
+not the only one, for in periodic squint just those conditions are
+wanting which induce a permanent deviation.
+
+It is further proved by the table that in convergent strabismus, myopia
+appears just about as frequently as the higher degrees of hypermetropia
+(of 3 dioptres and more). The fact that these are not so strongly
+represented in convergent strabismus, as one would have expected
+according to his theory, had also struck Donders. "This cannot be
+wondered at," he continues, "the power of accommodation, even with
+increased convergence, does not here suffice to produce clear images.
+One gains much better ideas by practice from imperfect retinal images
+than by correcting, as far as possible, the retinal images by a maximum
+of accommodation." I can concede neither to the facts on which the
+theory is based nor to the theoretical structure itself.
+
+An additional statistic which I drew up of the cases of hypermetropia
+which occurred during one year in my private practice, showed that the
+higher degrees are rare in the same proportion as cases of convergent
+strabismus are, with the corresponding degrees of hypermetropia.
+Further, however, I maintain that as a rule, at the age when squint
+usually begins, the accommodation really suffices to overcome even high
+degrees of hypermetropia. In all cases where we find full acuity of
+vision without correction of extreme hypermetropia--and this is
+frequently the case in young persons who do not squint--we may assume
+that the accommodation perfectly suffices to produce clear retinal
+images, without excessive convergence. In full acuity of vision even
+high degrees of hypermetropia are no trouble to children. Asthenopia,
+which occurs in children in connection with hypermetropia, is nearly
+always accompanied by defective vision. Were the increased demand on the
+accommodation really the cause of convergent strabismus, asthenopia
+would be far more common than it is among hypermetropic children who do
+not squint.
+
+One can assert, with far greater right, that a sufficient ground for
+squint is not given by slight degrees of hypermetropia, for the latter
+are accommodatively overcome and binocular fixation retained by youthful
+persons without any difficulty, even when the additional motives
+enumerated by Donders are present. I have endeavoured to obtain a
+foundation for the depreciating influence of these circumstances
+favorable to squint, for I counted in my private practice, at the same
+time with the cases of squint, those cases also in which, despite those
+conditions which lessen the value of binocular vision, squinting was not
+present. Taking notice then of those cases in which the hypermetropia of
+the better or less hypermetropic eye amounted to at least 1·5 D., in
+order to allow the influence of the hypermetropia to be more
+conspicuous. The patients from which the above-cited 219 cases of
+convergent strabismus with a hypermetropia of at least 1·5 D. are drawn,
+comprised also 117 cases in which, with the same degree of hypermetropia
+and simultaneous difference of refraction or monocular amblyopia, no
+convergent squint was present; of these cases 101 had acuity of vision
+to 1/7; less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 7, and V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36 9
+cases. The percentage 219: 117 = 100: 53, which is yielded for the
+middle and higher degrees of hypermetropia, is not exactly convincing
+for the accommodative theory of squint; it would be placed still less
+favorably if we were to include the lowest degrees of hypermetropia in
+the statistics.
+
+In face of these facts I do not consider it a happy question, that of
+seeking after "reasons for the prevention of squint." We do not want to
+quarrel with Donders over the question why all hypermetropes do not
+squint. Here, of course, I quite agree with Ulrich that squint does not
+occur if the necessary muscular conditions are absent. The identity of
+the fields of vision, on the other hand, seems to me to be of no
+importance for the age at which squint usually commences. This identity
+presupposes the habit of binocular fusion; but convergent squint arises,
+as a rule, before this habit is acquired. But even if binocular fusion
+were already learnt, it is given up with astonishing rapidity by
+children as soon as squint develops itself (see Case 16). The fixed
+habit of binocular fusion and the identity of the fields of vision
+dependent on it, is contracted only when squint does not occur,
+notwithstanding the presence of conditions favorable to it.
+
+However, the number of cases is so considerable in which, despite the
+presence of the causative motives suggested by Donders, no convergent
+strabismus is present, that the co-operation of other causes is
+necessary for the production of squint, and the first thing we do is to
+think of those causes which lead to squint even without hypermetropia.
+
+The attempt has really been made to attribute the commencement of
+convergent strabismus to the accommodation even in emmetropia, and
+offers fresh proof how easily facts are overwhelmed by theories. Donders
+originally gave it as his opinion, that loss of power or paresis of the
+accommodation produces strabismus just as little as the decrease in the
+amount of accommodation which comes with increase of years; a year
+later, because he could not agree with Donders' theory, Javal declared
+the principal cause to be due to weakening of the accommodation and not
+the refraction, but without producing any other ground for the assertion
+than that of his own good pleasure. Afterwards, Donders sought to
+explain the occurrence of convergent strabismus in emmetropia by paresis
+of accommodation, which must indeed, according to his theory, produce
+the same result as hypermetropia.
+
+I content myself by reminding my readers, that at the age when
+convergent strabismus usually arises, between the second and third year
+of life, a determination of the near point is utterly impossible; a
+foundation in fact is therefore wanting to the theory. But, further, if
+paresis of accommodation really had the significance assigned to it,
+atropine, which is so frequently used in the ophthalmic treatment of
+children, would be followed by convergent strabismus. This is still more
+the case with diphtheritic paralysis of accommodation, which is present
+more frequently than we are aware of, for it is only a trouble to
+children in the schoolroom, in younger children it passes through its
+natural uninterrupted course of recovery unobserved, in hypermetropia as
+well as in emmetropia. If the accommodation were really of great
+importance in the occurrence of squint, convergent strabismus would
+frequently be an after symptom of diphtheria, which, as is known, is not
+the case. The few cases of squint which I have seen after diphtheria,
+had their origin in paresis of the external rectus, which was proved by
+the objective defect in movement, as well as by the disappearance of the
+squint, with the recovery of the paralysis of the abducens.
+
+That the accommodation can play a part, is shown by the rarity of
+periodic accommodative squint, but for the great majority we must seek
+the chief cause of squint in emmetropia and myopia, in elastic
+preponderance of the internal recti and insufficiency of the externi,
+and it is apparent that the same causes will also be influential in
+hypermetropia.
+
+In hypermetropia, if one causes fixation at about 30 cm. and then covers
+the eye with the hand, it frequently deviates inwards. Donders infers
+from this, that most hypermetropes prefer to sacrifice comfortable and
+clear vision in order to retain binocular vision. Now, it is easy to
+convince oneself that youthful hypermetropes see distinctly even without
+correction of their hypermetropia, and we may assume that they see
+comfortably if they do not complain of asthenopia; but that is by no
+means always the case, for the appearance of asthenopia is conditional
+on the relation of the degree of the hypermetropia to the amount of the
+accommodation, which, apart from a few other causes, depends chiefly on
+the age of the patient.
+
+Just as we refer the deviation outwards of the covered eye to
+insufficiency of the interni or preponderance of the externi, we may
+conclude an inward deviation of the covered eye to be due to
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni, and this
+all the more, as in hypermetropia the covered eye very frequently
+remains in fixation, and falls away exceptionally into relative
+divergence.
+
+Just as in myopia even in the lesser degrees, insufficiency of the
+interni or preponderance of the externi is not rare, so in hypermetropia
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni appears to
+be frequent; and if this disturbance of the muscular balance be followed
+even in myopia or emmetropia by convergent strabismus, this will of
+course happen still more easily if at the same time hypermetropia, or
+even without hypermetropia, the remaining favouring conditions mentioned
+by Donders are present. Of course I do not deny the effect of the
+hypermetropia and of those other favouring conditions, but only wish to
+draw attention to the fact with reference to them, that as a rule they
+do not of themselves suffice to produce convergent strabismus.
+
+Nebulæ have always been regarded as one of the causes of squint; here I
+quite agree with Donders that they may operate, firstly, as general
+causes of weak sight; secondly, through this, that the irritated
+condition, combined with the keratitis, may produce a spasmodic,
+afterwards a trophic shortening of the muscles; but this seldom happens.
+
+Whether nebulæ are found rarely or often in squint, depends in great
+measure on the statistic materials which are worked out. In my
+statistics they do not occur in any quantity worth mentioning, because
+in private practice purulent ophthalmia keratitis, and in short, the
+whole army of external inflammations of the eye is much rarer, than in
+that portion of the populace which fills public clinics. Further, it is
+to be observed that the mere occurrence of nebulæ in squint proves
+nothing--even squinting eyes may develop keratitis. We must at least
+require to be assured that the squint began after the keratitis.
+
+Among the causes which promote the occurrence of squint, Donders
+mentions also conditions which diminish convergence. We have ascribed a
+very important _rôle_ to the muscles, and have only to occupy ourselves
+here with the relation between the visual line and the axis of the
+cornea, which we have already mentioned on page 2. Donders has measured
+the angle _a_ in ten cases of hypermetropia with convergent strabismus,
+and from the comparison with hypermetropic non-squinting eyes draws the
+conclusion, that in similar degrees of hypermetropia a higher amount of
+_a_ specially disposes to strabismus. I will not repeat here the witty
+deduction by which Donders seeks to point out that a higher value of a
+must be followed by insufficiency of the externi and preponderance of
+the interni; the concession is enough that these circumstances exist and
+are the cause of the squint.
+
+
+
+
+PERIODIC CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+
+The opinion is prevalent that convergent strabismus usually begins in
+the form of periodic squint, and that a permanent deviation is developed
+in this way only. In many cases it may be so; on the other hand I have
+sometimes seen convergent strabismus arise suddenly, without a
+preliminary stage of periodic squint. This question, however, is of no
+special interest. It is more important to note that periodic squint
+frequently continues to exist unchanged, without ever becoming
+permanent.
+
+Like the whole doctrine of strabismus, opinions on periodic squint have
+been governed by Donders' theory, regardless of facts, but as the
+accommodation frequently exercises a perceptible influence, it is
+judicious to consider first of all the cases in which this does not
+happen.
+
+Convergent squint in myopia begins as a rule with periodic squint, and
+may continue to exist in this form: some patients who would not be
+operated upon have been under my observation for years; sometimes a
+correct position was retained for a long time, and sometimes strong
+convergent squint was present, proving that accommodation had nothing
+whatever to do with it. In myopia of higher degree the accommodation is
+scarcely used--unless concave glasses are worn; still periodic squint
+occurs under these circumstances. For example:
+
+CASE 1. Miss B--, æt. 22, possesses in both eyes myopia of 6·5 D. with
+full visual acuteness and without posterior staphyloma. A concave
+eyeglass of 4·5 D. is used off and on for distance, and the eyes have
+never been over-exerted in looking at near objects. For a long time
+tendency to convergent squint, which is combined with diplopia, has
+existed on the left side. The eyes generally have a perfectly normal
+position, but occasionally convergent squint occurs, remains in
+existence a few hours, perhaps for a whole day even, and disappears
+again. The deviation here amounts to 4 or 5 mm. As the patient did not
+wish for an operation, I have been able to observe the condition for
+years without any change in it or without the squint becoming permanent.
+The cause of periodic squint is certainly not to be sought for here, in
+the accommodation.
+
+Many cases of convergent strabismus with myopia constantly offer such a
+peculiar phase of the defect, that one has accepted the statements which
+ascribe to short-sightedness a determining influence on this form of
+squint, without asking for further proof. It may, therefore, be useful
+for our purpose to cite a few cases of periodic convergent strabismus
+with emmetropia. For instance:
+
+CASE 2. Louise S--, æt. 6-1/2, came under treatment for follicular
+conjunctivitis, convergent strabismus appearing simultaneously on the
+right side; the investigation showed the acuity of vision of left eye =
+5/12, right V. = 5/36, the ophthalmoscope, and also mydriasis by
+atropine, proved the presence of emmetropia. The squint had first been
+observed when the child was about two years old, then it disappeared
+spontaneously and returned again three or four months ago.
+
+In the course of treatment, which extended over about six months, the
+child came repeatedly into my consulting room, sometimes with squint,
+sometimes without, in the periods during which correct fixation existed,
+no squint occurred even when working. Examination with the stereoscope
+showed no normal binocular fusion even during normal position of the
+eyes.
+
+CASE 3. Vera von K--, æt. 6; tendency to convergent strabismus, mostly
+on right side, has existed one and a half years. Normal position as a
+rule, on covering the eye immediate convergence, with a deviation of 5
+mm.; with additional aid of a red glass and weak prisms deviating in a
+vertical direction, homonymous diplopia is very easily provoked. Visual
+acuteness on both sides 5/12, the left slightly better than the right;
+emmetropia in mydriasis by atropine. A year later a repeated examination
+gave the same result.
+
+The cause of periodic squint in these cases can only be sought in the
+bearing of the ocular muscles; an elastic preponderance of the interni
+existed, which ceased, as a rule, on using the externi. A special
+influence of the accommodation was not traceable, which does not of
+course prevent this from acting differently in other cases. But in
+periodic squint it may frequently be observed that the deviation
+commences under influences which have nothing to do with the
+accommodation, but, on the contrary, under those which weaken the
+muscular energy generally, for example, fatigue, anxiety, &c.
+
+Like convergent squint generally, the periodic form is also more
+frequent in hypermetropia than in emmetropia or myopia, and we admit
+that in hypermetropia the strain on the accommodation has more influence
+in producing the deviation. But as the appearance of periodic squint in
+emmetropia or myopia is proved without participation of the
+accommodation, solely on the ground of the muscular forces--so the
+presence of the same forces in hypermetropia ought not to be ignored.
+
+It happens, indeed, that in considerable degrees of hypermetropia a
+slight convergent deviation occurs only from time to time, the cause of
+which, on closer investigation, can only be sought in the ocular
+muscles. For example:
+
+CASE 4. Paul F--, was first introduced to me in 1872 as a child of three
+years and two months, with a tendency to convergent strabismus on the
+right side of two months' standing, which was sometimes greater,
+sometimes less, and sometimes was not present at all. In 1877 I saw him
+again suffering from conjunctivitis, without perceiving any squint; no
+examination respecting it was made. In 1880 his elder brother came under
+treatment for apparent myopia, which with the ophthalmoscope proved to
+be hypermetropia, and my attention, being again drawn to the eyes of the
+family, I requested the younger brother to come for examination. At
+first sight the position of the eyes appeared to be quite normal, on
+more careful inspection slight convergent squint of the right eye showed
+itself occasionally. On both sides apparent emmetropia or very slight
+hypermetropia, acuity of vision on left side 5/9, on the right 5/18,
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction was impossible on account of
+restless fixation.
+
+With the addition of a red glass diplopia cannot be produced, the left
+field of vision is observed in the stereoscope, then the right one on
+covering the left eye; never both together. In mydriasis by atropine
+hypermetropia of high degree (about 4 dioptres) is ophthalmoscopically
+detected on both sides, with convex 4·5 D., V. = 5/9 with slight
+convergent deviation of the right eye.
+
+What has here prevented the transition to permanent squint with a
+deviation corresponding to the great strain on the accommodation? That
+the accommodation was really in action is proved simply by the apparent
+emmetropia and the school-work, that no retention of binocular single
+vision took place is shown by the proved incapacity for binocular fusion
+of the retinal images. Nothing then remains but to accept the fact that
+in the ocular muscles inducement was only given for a slight periodic
+squint, not for a permanent one answering to the amount of accommodation
+used.
+
+As further proof that periodic squint may occur even in hypermetropia
+quite independently of the accommodation, I should like to cite a case
+of intermittent convergent strabismus which a number of other oculists
+have seen besides myself.
+
+CASE 5. Sophie S--, æt. 7-3/4, has suffered for two years from a strong
+convergent squint on the left side, occurring every other day. The
+deviation amounts to 7 mm. (the same deviation is transferred to the
+left eye, when the right is put into fixation). On the intervening days
+the position of the eyes is quite normal, on covering one only a slight
+deviation takes place. The visual acuteness amounts to 5/12 on the left,
+5/24 on the right, ophthalmoscopically with atropine hypermetropia of
+two dioptres. Quinine has been given without avail, a convex glass of 2
+D. also, which has been worn for the last half year, has not affected
+the deviation.
+
+Diplopia was not present--on the intervening days free from squint, with
+the aid of a red glass, homonymous diplopia could be detected without
+perceptible deviation, still it was impossible to bring about a union of
+the double images by prisms. In the stereoscope the left field of vision
+was first inspected, then both, still fusion of the fields of vision was
+not traceable. The statements, moreover, as indeed could not be expected
+otherwise in a child of such tender age, were not free from
+contradictions, but the existence of normal binocular vision was very
+doubtful. I therefore performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus,
+after which normal position continued to exist on the following squint
+days. After three quarters of a year I saw the child again; the squint
+was perfectly cured, even on looking down, convergence was no longer
+present. Whether a permanent cure was thus obtained, seems to me
+doubtful, owing to the rare peculiarities of this case.
+
+Mannhardt also describes a similar case of intermittent squint; that of
+a girl aged eight years, in whom periodic convergent strabismus had
+begun four years previously, and for two years had occurred regularly
+every other day. On undecided vision the eyes were normally placed, but
+as soon as a near or distant object was fixed, a considerable deviation
+inwards of the left eye occurred. Under the covering hand both eyes
+deviated inwards equally. On the non-squinting days strabismus could in
+no way be produced even by fixation of the nearest objects, only under
+the covering hand a deviation inwards ensued. The squint could not be
+removed by quinine, but only by correction of the hypermetropia of 3 D.
+In any case, then, hypermetropia was one of the causes of the squint,
+but not the only one, as it cannot operate on alternate days only.
+
+Javal, who tries to make this case coincide with his theory, accepting
+an intermitting paresis of accommodation as the cause of squint, is
+manifestly in error, as Mannhardt particularly mentions that acuity of
+vision, refraction and accommodation remained perfectly equal on both
+days.
+
+If it is thus proved, that also in periodic inward squint the deviation
+may occur quite independently of the accommodation, on the other hand it
+is apparent, that if once a tendency to squint exists, a
+disproportionately strong convergence may very easily unite itself with
+the accommodation. Particularly of course in hypermetropes, who are able
+to fix nothing without using their accommodation, a remarkable
+fluctuation of the squint angle very frequently takes place. Sometimes
+the deviation is exceedingly strong, sometimes so slight that it seems
+to be absent. It is usually impossible to determine if it is really
+absent, for as soon as we single out a point for fixation to make the
+investigation feasible, strong deviation sets in. If in such cases we
+perfectly atropise both eyes, restore the attainable acuity of vision by
+neutralisation of the hypermetropia with convex glasses, and yet,
+nevertheless, as is generally the case, the customary strong convergence
+takes place on fixation of a distant object, there can be no talk of a
+strain on the accommodation; at most we can say, that the impulse for
+accommodation, habitually united with the intention to see distinctly,
+and the too strong convergence combined with it, also takes place,
+though by paralysis of the accommodation the participation of the same
+has become impossible. As accommodative squint those cases are chiefly
+indicated in which the deviation only takes place when there is a claim
+on the accommodation. In most cases of this kind hypermetropia is
+present. I have occasionally seen periodic accommodative squint with
+emmetropia of the fixing eye.
+
+CASE 6 may serve as an example: H. B--, æt. 15, shows a considerable and
+very varying periodic inward squint. Sometimes correct position is
+present, sometimes strong deviation, indeed the latter only occurs on
+looking at distant objects, while for near ones correct position of the
+eyes generally takes place. The examination showed for the right eye
+hypermetropia 1·5, for the left myopia 3·5 D.; full acuity of vision on
+both sides. The squint occurring in the left eye on looking at distant
+objects was therefore accommodative; the effort of the accommodation
+necessary for correcting the hypermetropia united itself to an
+excessively strong innervation of the interni, as the interests of
+binocular vision came but slightly into consideration on account of the
+myopia in the left eye. For near objects the myopic eye is used without
+accommodation and therefore also without convergent strabismus of the
+right. But if one caused a point about 25 cm. distant to be fixed first
+with the right (hypermetropic) eye while the left was covered and then
+caused fixation to be transferred to the left, the accommodative
+convergent strabismus induced was alternately transferred to the left
+eye and continued, although the left eye fixed without any effort of the
+accommodation on account of its myopia. Double tenotomy of the interni
+and correction of the hypermetropia effected the cure of the squint.
+
+The clearest cases of accommodative strabismus are those in which
+usually a correct position and sometimes even binocular fusion is
+present, while squint occurs only during the strain on the accommodation
+necessary for distinct vision.
+
+CASE 7. Miss Bertha v. Pr--, æt. 27, shows strong accommodative squint
+of the right eye, said to have been observed by her parents when she was
+fifteen months old. Correct position of the eyes is generally present
+with indistinct vision; the endeavours to see clearly immediately causes
+striking convergence of the right eye. On the left hypermetropia 3·5 D.,
+vision normal; on the right the same degree of hypermetropia, vision not
+more than 1/12 of the normal, no ophthalmoscopic report. On correction
+of the hypermetropia and with aid of a red glass crossed diplopia
+immediately appears, which is corrected by a prism of 5° base inwards;
+prisms of 12° with the bases inwards are overcome on fixation of an
+object about 12 ft. distant by divergence. The elastic tension of the
+ocular muscles necessitates then a preponderance of the externi, and an
+effort of the accommodation necessary to overcome the hypermetropia,
+which on account of the congenital amblyopia of the right eye unites
+itself with excessive convergence. Had the elastic tension of the ocular
+muscles made a preponderance of the interni a condition, permanent
+convergent squint would have been the result, and one would have called
+the weak sight of the right eye amblyopia from want of use.
+
+Typical accommodative squint occurs quite independently of the will on
+each effort of the accommodation, and is not combined with diplopia. It
+is otherwise in those cases of hypermetropia of high degree in which
+patients voluntarily call forth convergent squint, and retain it for a
+short time for the purpose of distinct vision. They are then perfectly
+conscious of the squint, and perceive also as a rule the double images
+which occur at the same time; I have seen such cases in adults who could
+only produce the accommodation necessary for distinct vision by the aid
+of a too strong convergence; they, however, only now and then made use
+of this help. Although differing much from the typical form, these cases
+of voluntary accommodative squint were also included in the statistics.
+
+In involuntary periodic (even if not accommodative) squint, the patient
+as a rule is not conscious of the occurrence of the false position; that
+exceptions to this occur Case 1 has given us an instance.
+
+
+
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT IN MYOPIA.
+
+
+For the ætiology of convergent strabismus it is of interest to ascertain
+the age at which it is developed, and one of the first results we obtain
+is the exceptional position which the union of myopia with convergent
+strabismus takes in this category. Of the 56 cases contained in the
+above statistics I possess reliable information of the time of
+commencement in 11 cases; the squint was twice observed before the
+fourth year of life, once between four and ten years of age, eight times
+between the tenth and thirty-third years of life.
+
+I must first state prominently with regard to the connection of myopia
+with convergent squint that I see no reason for holding short sight to
+be the cause of the squint, as v. Graefe does.
+
+A specially severe strain of the eyes, as v. Graefe assumes, was not
+traceable in the cases observed by me. Excessive convergence and strain
+on the accommodation is often enough present in weak sight, for example,
+in astigmatism without the existence of squint; were short sight in
+general an inducement to convergent squint these cases would appear much
+oftener than they actually do, owing to the frequency of myopia. In my
+opinion the cause of their rarity lies in the fact that myopia is
+frequently combined with insufficiency of the interni and preponderance
+of the externi, but only rarely with the reverse condition of the
+muscles. If, however, a preponderance of the interni develops itself
+together with the myopia, convergent strabismus is easily produced, for
+without correction of the myopia by spectacles, the desire for retaining
+binocular single vision for everything beyond the far point is lessened
+by the indistinctness of the retinal images. Within the range of their
+field of distinct vision these squinting myopes frequently retain
+binocular vision, while the capacity for accepting parallel rays or
+retaining them for long, is lost.
+
+Strictly speaking, the periodic squint present in these cases is of a
+peculiar kind, for the binocular single vision present within range of
+the convergence excludes the notion of squint; the latter only occurs
+when an object lying outside the point of convergence is fixed.
+Moreover, according to the common use of language, I have only used the
+expression periodic convergent squint for the change between a parallel
+direction of the visual axes and pathological convergence.
+
+As squint in myopia usually commences at an age when binocular fusion
+has already become a fixed habit, diplopia regularly takes place with
+it, but patients become more easily accustomed to this than in paralysis
+of the ocular muscles, because the retinal images are indistinct and the
+double images in the field of vision always keep at about the same
+distance, while in paralysis of the ocular muscles the distance is
+constantly changing.
+
+The myopia, in these cases, is not the cause of the squint, but only a
+favouring circumstance. If the same preponderance of the interni is
+developed at the same age in emmetropia, squint is not so easily caused,
+as the distinct retinal images present in the whole field of vision
+render it easy to retain binocular single vision. Therefore we see the
+same form of squint arise less often in emmetropia (see Case 45) when
+childhood is past, than in myopia. As a rule preponderance of the
+interni in hypermetropia leads eventually to convergent squint even in
+childhood.
+
+In emmetropia and hypermetropia convergent strabismus seldom arises
+after the tenth year (paresis of the abducens of course excepted),
+therefore in my investigations as to the time of commencement of typical
+squint I have only considered those patients who came under my treatment
+before their tenth year. We must rely for the most part on the vague
+statements of the parents, which lose in exactness in proportion as the
+origin of the squint is of distant date; moreover, I have myself seen a
+great many of the children before they were four years old. In this way
+I have collected reliable information respecting the origin of the
+squint in 193 cases, and of these (_a_) 88 cases occurred in children
+one to three years old, (_b_) 53 in children three to four years old,
+(_c_) 35 cases in children of over four years of age. It is thus at once
+seen that in the great majority of cases, convergent strabismus
+commences in children under four years of age, who have not yet begun to
+read and write, and have no inducement to use their accommodation
+severely, and still less continuously.
+
+
+
+
+SQUINT FROM PARALYSIS OF THE ABDUCENS.
+
+
+Convergent squint as a result of paralysis of the abducens is not very
+often seen. It is first to be observed that a convergent squint,
+including the whole field of vision, occurs by no means in all cases; in
+about half the cases binocular fusion is retained towards the healthy
+side, diplopia then only occurs when the weak abducens is exerted beyond
+its strength. In those cases in which convergent squint is present in
+the whole field of vision paralysis of the abducens cannot be the sole
+cause, but some other cause than the most apparent one must co-operate.
+An insufficiency of the externi of previous existence, or an elastic
+preponderence of the interni may be considered. I have not been able to
+persuade myself of the fact that hypermetropia can play any part
+therein.
+
+In by far the greater number of cases paralytic convergent squint
+recovers together with the paralysis of the abducens, the field of
+single vision transfers itself gradually from the healthy side to the
+side of the weak abducens, and at length governs the whole field of
+vision. In proportion as the muscle again fulfils its normal functions,
+the habit of binocular fixation regains its power, and it seldom happens
+that the elastic tension of the muscles has so changed during paralysis
+that the desire for binocular single vision does not suffice to overcome
+it. Case 48 furnishes an example of the fact that although the squint
+occurred as a consequence of paralysis of the abducens, it certainly
+remained in existence after healing of the paralysis on account of
+previously existing insufficiency of the externi.
+
+Congenital paralysis of the abducens seems more frequently to have
+convergent squint as a result. If, for example, convergent squint is
+observed in the first year of life, and we find a complete defect of
+motion on the part of one abducens when the children become old enough
+to be examined, we may certainly assume that the case is one of
+congenital paralysis of this muscle, or at least that the paralysis
+originated soon after birth. Doubtless, however, cases appear, of
+congenital paralysis of the abducens without squint, and as these cases
+are so rare I will describe two which I observed in adults.
+
+CASE 8. Miss H--, æt. 17, has nominally since her birth a considerable
+defect in the outward movement of the left eye. On looking to the left
+homonymous diplopia is present, on looking to the front and the right
+binocular single vision and no squint; on both sides emmetropia and full
+acuity of vision.
+
+CASE 9. Mr. V. W--, æt. 24, has likewise congenital paralysis of the
+left abducens. No squint, but as soon as the left eye is used for
+fixation in the left direction there occurs in the right one a strong
+secondary movement inwards.
+
+
+
+
+HYSTERICAL SQUINT.
+
+
+In the hysterical form we see rather a rare variety of convergent
+squint, which is conditional on contraction of the interni through
+restriction of movement of the externi. Hysterical symptoms may at the
+same time appear in the eyes or elsewhere, still this does not always
+happen. As these cases are rare I will relate a few of those I have
+observed. (These cases are not included in the above statistics.)
+
+CASE 10. Anna R--, æt. 20, came under treatment in February, 1878,
+stating that on the previous day she perceived blindness of the right
+eye on waking; in the afternoon she felt particularly weary, and after
+she had slept about an hour woke with blindness in both eyes. No
+perception of light, good pupillary reaction, ophthalmoscopic report
+normal. Patient was treated with copious enemata and dismissed on the
+fifth day cured.
+
+In February, 1880, she again came under treatment with blindness of both
+eyes, also perceived the previous day on waking. Convergent strabismus
+was present at the same time, of such a degree that the eyes converged
+to a point 10 to 20 cm. distant. The outward movement was suspended in
+both eyes. The attempt to turn the eye outwards is accompanied by short
+convulsive movements, and followed by an immediate rebound to the
+convergent position. She asserts her inability to see the movements of a
+hand before her eyes, is able, however, to move about in a strange room,
+unsteadily certainly, but with avoidance of obstacles; she sits down on
+a chair indicated to her, &c. The position of the eyes proves that there
+was no simulation in all this; it would be impossible for any person to
+simulate a strong convergent squint continuously for four to five days.
+Eight days after her admission the patient was dismissed with normal
+movement of the eyes and good vision.
+
+CASE 11. Miss Antonie E--, æt. 15, who has been treated by her family
+physician for various hysterical disturbances, suffered since the middle
+of December, 1879, from convergent strabismus with permanent but very
+varying deviation, which is at times very slight, and sometimes amounted
+to more than 7 mm. The movement outwards is in both eyes rendered
+difficult, still the outer edge of the cornea is brought to the outer
+angle of the lids with trouble and twitching movements. Homonymous
+double images are present, their mutual distance is alike in the whole
+field of vision, but is (six or eight weeks after the commencement of
+the squint) signified as being slight; at the same time a difference in
+height is present, the image of the left eye stands lower, prism 30°,
+base outwards, places the images just above one another. Nystagmus
+occasionally occurs in monocular fixation (with exclusion of the other
+eye). In due course a gradual improvement set in, the deviation and the
+distance apart of the double images became slighter, the outward
+movement better, and in the middle of April, 1880, four months after the
+trouble began, no squint and no diplopia were present, the outward
+movement normal, facultative divergence = 0.
+
+The hysterical character of the visual disturbance showed itself when
+the vision was tested. I will first observe that repeated investigations
+with atropine showed emmetropia, while in the first investigation on the
+left side, No. 36 at 5 m. was not recognised with the naked eye, but
+only with weak concave glasses (with - ·5 D. V. = 5/18). With the right
+eye No. 0·8 was read fluently, from 0·75 she asserted she was unable to
+recognise a word, with - 2 D. V. = 5/36. It would be wrong to conclude
+from this myopia or spasm of the accommodation, for here, as in most
+cases of hysterical weak sight, it could be shown that whatever glass
+one chose to hold before the patient's eyes, was followed by an
+improvement in the statements. The same improvement in visual acuteness
+was repeatedly obtained in this case by a weak prism (3°), held before
+the fixing eye during monocular examination, and in the end, V. 5/12 was
+obtained for the right eye, as against 5/6 with a prism of 3°.
+
+Finally, on May 1st, full visual acuteness was present on both sides.
+Field of vision and sense of colour normal.
+
+CASE 12. Mrs. B--, æt. 30, previously treated for various hysterical
+disturbances, has complained for about eight days of disordered vision,
+the binocular nature of which was proved as patient had herself observed
+that on closing one eye she could at once see clearly. Near objects to
+15 cm. are seen distinctly. With all this, at the first examination it
+was impossible to produce diplopia, either with the aid of a red glass
+or prisms, &c., the images of first one eye, then the other were always
+seen by turns. A few days later, on repeating the examination, double
+images were perceived, they were homonymous with slight difference in
+height (image of the right eye lower), the lateral displacement is
+corrected by a prism of 28°. Micropsia of one image was also perceived.
+On both sides the outward movement is rather difficult. Full visual
+acuity on both sides--in the first examination slight myopia - ·75 D. is
+specified, afterwards emmetropia. The visual disturbance was removed by
+goggles with faintly ground glass on the right side--preparations of
+iron, bromide salts, shampooing with cold water and electricity were
+used. In six weeks' time binocular single vision was again restored; the
+facultative divergence = 0. With red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms homonymous diplopia corrected by prism 3°. Field of vision and
+sense of colour remained normal throughout.
+
+
+
+
+DIVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+
+If we want to draw a comparison between convergent and divergent squint,
+we must consider only absolute divergent strabismus, for convergent
+strabismus does not offer a parallel to relative divergent squint. In
+absolute divergent squint the direction of the visual axes is such that
+they would meet behind the patient's head; in the relative divergent
+squint the axes of vision are parallel or slightly convergent, but they
+do not cross at the point fixed by the one eye, but at a greater
+distance off.
+
+If we then only compare that which admits of comparison, we first find
+out that divergent squint is rarer than the convergent form, and the
+cause contained in the ocular muscles is here brought to light still
+more clearly than there.
+
+We must next distinguish between permanent and periodic squint, and we
+see the latter so frequently continue as such, that we must not consider
+the transition from this variety to the permanent one to be the rule.
+
+In 183 cases of absolute divergent strabismus which appeared in my
+private practice in the same space of time as the cases of convergent
+squint above discussed I have been able to obtain exact determinations
+of the refraction and visual acuteness. The weakness of the fixing eye
+was the test for classing them among the statistics, and in patients who
+had been long under observation, the first certain determination of
+refraction, which was necessary, as several children are included who
+came under treatment with divergent strabismus and emmetropia whilst
+myopia developed itself later.
+
+
+A. Divergent squint with hypermetropia.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 4 cases. Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than
+1/7 1 case, V. less than 1/36 1 case, 2 excluded, one on account of
+complication with detachment of retina, the other on account of
+impossibility of testing vision.
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 5 cases. Among them 3 with double hypermetropia, 2
+with emmetropia in one, and hypermetropia in the other eye. Visual
+acuteness of more than 1/7 in 3 cases; V. = 1/9 1 case; V. = 1/36 1
+case.
+
+
+B. Divergent squint in emmetropia.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 32 cases. Among them 10 with alternating strabismus and
+anisometropia of at least 2 D. And in 9 cases emmetropia in one, myopia
+in the other eye; once simple hypermetropic astigmatism in one, with
+myopic astigmatism in the other eye. Visual acuteness of both eyes in
+these 10 cases more than 1/7. In the 22 cases of monocular squint the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye amounted 8 times to more than 1/7
+-, 10 times 1/12 to 1/36 (in 1 case V. = 1/36 with nystagmus of the
+squinting eye when put into fixation). V. less than 1/36 in 3 cases; 6
+cases excluded on account of complications.
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 28 cases. Among them 5 with anisometropia of at
+least 2 D. (emmetropia in one, myopia in the other eye). Visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 27 cases, less than 1/7
+to V. = 1/12 in 1 case.
+
+
+C. Divergent squint in myopia to M. = 2 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 24 cases (among them 6 with anisometropia of at least 2
+D.). Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 15 cases. V.
+less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. less than 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. less
+than 1/36 2 cases; 2 cases excluded on account of complications (one on
+account of atrophy of the optic nerve, the other on account of posterior
+polar cataract).
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 23 cases. Among them 10 cases with anisometropia
+of at least 2 D. Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in all 23 cases.
+
+
+D. Divergent squint in myopia 2 D. to M. = 4 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 17 cases. Among them 2 with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. to 1/7 9 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case. V. < 1/12 to V. =
+1/36 2 cases. V. < 1/36 1 case. Four cases excluded (2 with choroiditis,
+1 with congenital cataract, 1 with traumatic cataract).
+
+(_b_) Periodic 8 cases. Among them 4 with anisometropia of at least 2 D.
+V. to 1/7 7 cases. V. 1/36 1 case.
+
+
+E. Divergent squint in myopia 4 D. to M. 6·5 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 10 cases. V. more than 1/7 in 5; V. less than 1/36 in 3
+cases, 2 excluded (one on account of large anterior synechia, one on
+account of choroiditis of the macula lutea).
+
+(_b_) Periodic 9 cases. Among them one with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. more than 1/7 5 cases. V. = 1/9 1 case; 3 cases excluded on
+account of complications.
+
+
+F. Divergent squint in myopia more than 6·5 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 4 cases, 4 excluded on account
+of choroiditis of the macula lutea.
+
+(_b_) Periodic 10 cases. V. to 1/7 9 cases; V. = 1/12 in one case.
+
+
+_Table of Refraction and Visual Acuteness in Divergent Squint._
+
+[Transcriber's note: Key created to make table fit page]
+
+KEY:
+A: Permanent.
+B: V. to 1/7.
+C: V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12.
+D: V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36.
+E: V. < 1/36.
+F: Excluded.
+G: Periodic.
+H: V. to 1/7.
+I: V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12.
+J: V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36.
+K: V. < 1/36.
+L: Excluded.
+
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+ | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L
+-------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--
+Hypermetropia | 4| 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -- | --
+Emmetropia | 37| 18 | -- | 10 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 27 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+Myopia to M. 2 D. | 24| 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 23 | -- | -- | -- | --
+M. 2 D. to 4 D. | 17| 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 7 | -- | 1 | -- | --
+M. 4 D. to 6·5 D. | 10| 5 | -- | -- | 3 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | -- | -- | 3
+M. more than 6·5 D.| 8| 4 | -- | -- | -- | 4 | 10 | 9 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+ |100| 52 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 20 | 83 | 74 | 4 | 2 | -- | 3
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+
+It follows then from this, that periodic absolute divergent squint is
+just about as frequent as the permanent form and that both become more
+rare as the degrees of myopia increase. As, however, in spite of this,
+myopia is present in about 60 per cent. of all cases, the connection can
+be no other than this, that myopia frequently unites itself with
+insufficiency of the interni and preponderance of the externi; in this
+respect, as in every other, myopia and hypermetropia are directly
+opposed.
+
+The setting up of a "hypermetropic divergent strabismus," dependent on
+hypermetropia, seems to me only to show how much people have been
+carried away by the idea that the cause of the squint must be given by
+the state of refraction. Isler claims 17 to 29 per cent. of the cases
+for hypermetropic divergent strabismus; of these, however, the half
+possess only slight hypermetropia of 2 D. or less, which perfectly
+agrees with the fact that the same observer has also found in convergent
+squint a remarkably high percentage of the lower degrees of
+hypermetropia.
+
+Whether squint originates in the permanent or periodic form depends
+chiefly on whether the movement of convergence is retained or lost.
+There are cases of considerable divergent squint, in which the near
+point of the convergence is scarcely removed, while on the other hand,
+the physiological innervation for convergence may be lost, without
+absolute divergence ever being brought about. In a number of emmetropic
+or slightly myopic cases with absolute preponderance of the externi, the
+physiological connection between accommodation and convergence is
+maintained in a relaxed way; thus, for example, it is impossible to
+converge voluntarily to a large object, as, for instance, a pencil held
+in the vertical line, while accurate convergence immediately follows on
+reading at the same distance; in other cases accommodation can be
+exerted to the near point, without inducing the slightest impulse to
+convergence. This circumstance is worthy of consideration for the
+prognosis of the operation. A mere relaxing of the tie between
+accommodation and convergence may be strengthened by practice, but if
+the impulse to innervation is completely lost, it will scarcely be
+possible to restore it again; as after complete laying aside of absolute
+divergence the relative form still continues to exist.
+
+Those cases deserve special consideration in which emmetropia is present
+in one eye, in the other myopia. Slight degrees of one-sided myopia
+reconcile themselves with the continuance of a normal binocular act of
+vision. If the far point of the myopic eye lies at an inconvenient
+proximity even for reading, then, as a rule, the emmetropic eye is used
+for near as well as distant objects; if, on the contrary, the degree of
+myopia answers to a range of vision convenient for working, and visual
+acuteness is normal, then the temptation to use the emmetropic eye only
+for distance and the myopic one only for near objects is so
+overpowering, and the advantages on the other hand which would be
+offered by clinging to binocular vision so slight, that a convenient
+monocular vision is generally preferred. Even for objects which lie
+nearer the eye than the far point of the myopic, and at the same time
+farther than the near point of the emmetropic eye, for which, therefore,
+both eyes could secure clear retinal images, binocular vision is not
+used. In cases in which the patient can read with proper binocular
+fixation, if one covers all but one line and then makes with prisms
+double images standing one above another, it is the myopic eye alone
+which almost invariably shows a clear retinal image.
+
+The usual result of this is, first a relaxing of binocular vision, and
+as together with this the motive for convergence, namely, the effort of
+the accommodation ceases, the conditions for the commencement of
+divergence are produced. Still the elastic tension of the ocular muscles
+decides even here; if the interni preponderate, convergent squint
+results, when the myopic eye is used for near objects, the emmetropic
+for distant ones. If the externi preponderate, then permanent or
+periodic divergent strabismus is caused. Nevertheless, in a remarkable
+minority of cases the elastic tension of the ocular muscles is so
+regulated that, despite relaxation of binocular fusion, neither
+convergent squint nor absolute divergence occurs, but simple relative
+divergence remains with employment of the myopic eye for near objects.
+
+
+
+
+DYNAMIC SQUINT, INSUFFICIENCY OF THE INTERNI AND MUSCULAR ASTHENOPIA.
+
+
+The habit of binocular single vision, when it has once reached its
+normal development, governs the movements of our eyes to a great degree;
+the desire to avoid double images makes itself continually felt; and
+where this is not possible, an uncomfortable feeling of uncertainty
+arises at every movement of the body. Double images are prevented as far
+as possible by movements of the eyes, which we must designate as
+voluntary when we are conscious of their occurrence.
+
+If we follow a moving object with the eyes, the latter make
+corresponding movements in order to keep the image in the centre of both
+retinæ. For example, if we look at a distant object which approaches in
+the direction of one visual axis, this eye will necessarily remain
+still, while the other will be put into convergence in proportion as the
+object advances. If this did not happen, if this eye remained also
+immovable, the retinal image would deviate outwards more and more from
+the macula lutea and diplopia would arise. In order then to avoid
+diplopia the macula lutea moves to where the retinal image is formed. We
+can, however, move the images on the retina by the aid of prisms without
+movement of the object. If, for example, we hold a prism before the eye
+so that the base lies towards the temporal side, the retinal image will
+be displaced towards the base of the prism, outwards then from the
+macula, and double images will occur, which are at once removed by a
+distinctly perceptible inward movement of the eye. In this way, by means
+of a prism applied with the base inwards, outward deviation may be
+produced, and even in a modified way deviations in height of the visual
+axes by means of prisms with the base upwards or downwards. Here the
+force of habit is apparent, for in the daily use of our eyes we
+continually practise the inward movement of the visual axes; we can also
+easily restore the customary degree of convergence by means of prisms
+with the bases outwards; physiologically indeed, it is quite immaterial
+whether an object is in a proximity to our eyes attainable by
+convergence, which causes double images until it is binocularly fixed,
+or whether by the aid of prisms we bring the retinal images of a distant
+object to parts of the retinæ which do not correspond. If we look at a
+distant object fixed with parallel visual axes, under normal
+circumstances, prisms of 6° to 8° with the base inwards can be overcome,
+that is to say, as in weak prisms the deviation is equal to about half
+of the prism, an absolute divergence of the visual axes of 3° to 4° may
+be produced by which the double images are blended. It is immaterial
+whether we apply a prism of, say 8° to one eye, or prisms of 4° with the
+bases inwards to both. The facultative divergence thus attainable
+remains the same, which speaks for the fact, that this monolateral
+movement attainable by prisms is also combined with double innervation;
+and of course in the eye remaining in unmoved fixation, with impulses to
+innervation which are reciprocally abolished.
+
+In the physiological use of our eyes we certainly never have occasion to
+practise absolute divergence, but we constantly practise the transition
+from the inward to the outward movement of the eyes, and experiments
+with prisms teach us, that the innervation of the externi therewith
+connected may even be carried somewhat beyond the physiological limits
+of parallelism. Moreover, the extent of the "facultative" divergence
+attainable by prisms shows a considerable latitude.
+
+The case is similar with deviation in height of the visual axes. In
+looking upwards or downwards the innervation of both eyes is usually
+precisely the same, but on looking at any point when holding the head
+obliquely, the difference in height of the eyes then present must be
+balanced by a corresponding difference in the direction of the visual
+axes. The same thing happens, if we hold a vertically deviating prism in
+front of one eye in binocular vision; prisms of 2° to 3° may then be
+overcome by difference in height of the eyes; rarely is a much greater
+difference in height of the visual axes attainable. I have seen this
+particularly in those cases where facultative divergence also was
+greater than usual.
+
+It happens especially in myopia that prisms of considerably more than 6°
+to 8° are overcome by divergence, and certainly without causing any
+inconvenience. Among the cases presented for examination, those, of
+course, are most numerous where the patients have some complaint to
+make, even if this have quite a different cause. In any case a divergent
+position of the axes of vision corresponds to the balance of the
+muscles, and this does not generally occur, for this reason, because
+retaining binocular single vision necessitates a parallel or convergent
+position of the eyes. Frequently, however, even a slight impediment to
+binocular fusion, such as the application of a red glass to one eye,
+suffices to procure preponderance in the elastic tensions of the
+muscles, and to cause the fixed point to appear double. We can put a
+stop to binocular single vision still more surely by applying to one eye
+a prism with the base upwards or downwards. If the double images of a
+point 4 to 5 meters distant show a crossed lateral position besides the
+difference in height caused by the prism, we may assume that an
+absolute divergent position of the eyes corresponds to the elastic
+tension of the muscles; and the measure of the deviation will be given
+by those prisms which, placed with the bases inwards before one or both
+eyes, bring the double images perpendicularly over one another. As a
+rule, in these cases the degree of divergence which occurs on cessation
+of binocular single vision, is almost as great as the facultative
+divergence, which may be reached in the interest of binocular single
+vision.
+
+V. Graefe designates as "dynamic squint" that condition in which the
+position of divergence corresponding to the state of tension of the
+muscles does not occur because binocular vision is retained. Without
+clearly defined limits these conditions pass on into periodic squint,
+when either diplopia occurs together with the divergence, or the habit
+of binocular fusion becomes less frequent or is quite forgotten, while,
+however, according to the varying state of the muscles sometimes normal
+position, sometimes divergence, is present. A correct position of the
+eyes is quite possible even without binocular fusion, then only the
+regulator is wanting, which, in the varying play of the muscular forces,
+ensures the balance of position and movement.
+
+The older ophthalmologists had a parallel strabismus and probably
+understood by that, what we now designate as relative divergence. The
+connection between relative divergence and myopia, pointed out by
+Donders, is universally admitted; on the other hand, in more modern
+literature we scarcely find any intimation of the fact that a parallel
+squint occurs, which is quite independent of myopia, and rests solely on
+the fact that the impulse of innervation for convergence is lost. A few
+examples may explain this condition.
+
+CASE 13.--Auguste T--, æt. 28. On the left emmetropia, V. 12/20. On the
+right the visual acuteness is variously given, but certainly does not
+amount to more than 1/5 nor less than 1/10 of the normal.
+Ophthalmoscopic report normal. The left eye is naturally the fixing one,
+the right always remains parallel--for near objects double images are
+present. A convergent movement is not attained, either for near objects,
+or by means of prisms with bases outwards for distant ones. Prisms with
+the bases inwards are not overcome; with vertically deviating prisms the
+double images of distant objects stand perpendicularly above one
+another.
+
+CASE 14.--Ludwig v. K--, æt 32, has complained of diplopia repeatedly
+for fifteen years. Statement in August, 1877: Convergence to a pencil
+held before patient on the median line is only retained to about 50 cm.,
+nearer, crossed diplopia occurs. In reading, binocular fixation is
+possible with an effort at a nearer point. The facultative divergence
+does not amount to more than 3°; even by convergence to a distance of 4
+mtr. prisms of 3° only are overcome. Emmetropia and full visual acuity
+on both sides. In Sept., 1880, three years after, the statement remained
+unaltered. Patient has only used the prismatic spectacles then
+prescribed off and on, as the symptoms are sometimes more troublesome,
+sometimes less so, and he exerts his eyes but little on the whole.
+
+A restriction of movement of the internal recti did not exist in these
+cases; the absence of the convergent movement is not then to be set down
+to the interni not possessing the proper power for acting, but only to
+the fact that the impulse for their simultaneous innervation was
+wanting. We frequently find this absence of innervation in divergent
+squint, and then generally consider it to be a consequence of the
+squint, which, however, as the above cases show, need not necessarily be
+the case. If preponderance of the externi is at the same time present,
+absolute divergence is the result, but not always permanent squint,
+frequently only the periodic form. The anomaly of innervation may also
+usually be proved in such cases, in that after the removal by operation
+of the absolute divergence it continues to exist in the relative form;
+it can indeed happen that for a few days after the operation convergent
+squint is present for distance, together with relative divergence for
+near objects.
+
+The highest phases of this anomaly, as represented in Cases 13 and 14,
+are seldom seen. Slighter degrees, which, like so many other things, are
+usually designated as "insufficiency of the interni," are more
+frequently met with and are combined with asthenopia. On the one hand,
+in looking at near objects a tendency exists to the formation of double
+images, which are removed by the action of the interni; on the other
+hand, however, the habit of binocular single vision is relinquished on
+account of the frequent diplopia. In all forms of squint we see that
+binocular fusion is forgotten; still it seems more natural to assume
+this to be the result, and not the cause of the squint, as Krenchel
+does.
+
+Another form of relative divergence is that which is brought about in
+consequence of extreme myopia. The change in form of the myopic eye
+diminishes its mobility, associated movements of the eyes may be
+replaced by turning the head, but this is not possible for the movement
+of convergence. Further, in extreme myopia the far point is generally
+used for reading, &c., and sometimes even a somewhat greater distance,
+because on account of the close proximity of the objects the retinal
+images are so large that they are sufficiently clearly recognised even
+if they are not quite distinct. At all events accommodation certainly
+does not take place, hence one motive favouring convergence is removed.
+
+Finally, however, such considerable convergence as clear vision demands
+in high degrees of myopia, would be difficult even for a normally
+movable eye. Reasons enough therefore exist for giving up binocular
+fixation and using only the more convenient eye for reading, without
+effort to the accommodation and convergence. In myopia of high degree
+patients almost always read with relative divergence, and these myopes
+do just what we must advise them to do, they avoid strain of the
+accommodation and convergence of the visual axes and thus keep well.
+
+Notwithstanding that this condition necessarily results from the nature
+of extreme myopia, it is frequently held to be pathological, which it
+certainly is not in itself. At most, the short-sightedness and change in
+form of the eye are pathological; the relative divergence on the other
+hand is simply a harmless result of the above conditions.
+
+No doubts whatever exist about this relative divergence. The theory that
+the demands on the working eye must be very much increased is quite
+unfounded. If any harmful influence were to be feared for the fixing
+eye, one would observe the same in convergent squint, when, as a rule,
+one eye only is used for fixation even after operation.
+
+In convergent strabismus, however, no one, at least no ophthalmologist,
+thinks of entertaining such fears for the eye used in fixation, and
+where is the physiological basis of this whole idea to be found? Is the
+visual purple more active in monocular than in binocular vision, or what
+physiological activity is thereby taxed in increased degree?
+
+I have found no confirmation of Alfred Graefe's theory that in myopia
+the eye chiefly used in fixation is frequently affected with choroiditis
+of the macula lutea, &c., but have only observed that patients to whom
+this happens seek the advice of a physician more eagerly than when the
+same intra-ocular troubles befall the other usually neglected eye in
+connection with myopia.
+
+Muscular asthenopia undoubtedly occurs; it is only a question whether it
+is as frequent as it is diagnosed. It has its foundation in that the
+convergence necessary for reading, writing, &c., can only be sustained
+by an effort of the internal recti, which exceeds their strength, and
+finally results in painful fatigue of the muscles, just as accommodative
+asthenopia depends on painful fatigue of the muscles of accommodation.
+The similarity reaches still further. We occasionally find that despite
+considerable degrees of hypermetropia no asthenopia occurs even in
+persons who strain their eyes; while, on the other hand, asthenopic
+troubles appear in hypermetropia which are not removed by correction of
+the refraction and must consequently have some other motive. Yet still
+more is this the case with those disorders, of which muscular asthenopia
+may be supposed to be the cause. Notwithstanding the existence of a
+considerable preponderance of the externi, muscular asthenopia may be
+entirely absent. If we find, for example, that as soon as we do away
+with binocular single vision absolute divergence occurs even on looking
+at a distant fixed point, and that prisms of 12° to 30° are overcome by
+divergence, we may safely assume that the elastic preponderance of the
+externi must be overcome in reading, &c., in the interest of binocular,
+single vision by a stronger muscular effort of the interni, which is,
+however, very frequently accomplished without fatigue. Asthenopic
+disorders are also frequently present together with preponderance of the
+externi, which continue to exist despite the removal of the same by
+operation, and must consequently have some other cause. The diagnosis of
+accommodative asthenopia is as a rule confirmed _ex juvantibus_; this
+cannot be asserted for the muscular form.
+
+For example, Case 15.--Mathilde F--, æt. 21, has suffered from
+asthenopic disorders for three years. The investigation at the beginning
+of January, 1880, shows: On the left, myopia 4 D., V. = 5/18, No. 0·3 is
+read at 10 cm.; on the right, myopia 6 D., V. 5/24, 0·3 is read with
+difficulty, cylindrical glasses cause no improvement. Patient converges
+to about 8 cm., on exclusion absolute divergence of 3 to 4 mm. follows,
+with slight upward deviation of the right eye.
+
+On correction of the myopia the facultative divergence amounts to = 26°.
+Here one might easily have concluded the asthenopia to be a result of
+fatigue of the interni, but this opinion was refuted by the effect of
+the treatment. The double tenotomy of the externi performed on January
+2nd was first followed by convergent squint with homonymous double
+images, which were united by a prism of 12° with the base inwards. In
+the course of a few days single vision was again restored. A fortnight
+after the operation, on correction of the myopia, patient could see
+singly to 3 mtr.: towards both sides homonymous double images were still
+present, and in fixation to 30 cm. relative divergence on exclusion of
+one eye. Six months after the operation, on correction of the myopia and
+application of red glass to one eye, crossed double images occur close
+together, which become homonymous by means of a prism of 3° with the
+base inwards. Patient sees double images always, without being much
+disturbed by them, yet they cannot be united by means of prisms. The
+habit of binocular single vision has also gradually been lost. In
+reading (without correction) a movement of convergence takes place (it
+cannot be determined whether this answers exactly to the distance of the
+object). If, on the other hand, one asks the patient to fix binocularly
+larger objects, such as a pencil close to her, she is unable to do it,
+relative divergence occurs then, as well as on exclusion of one eye. The
+asthenopic disorders remain unchanged and are not removed even by
+prismatic spectacles. Despite all reasons then for the supposition the
+asthenopia was certainly not of a muscular nature.
+
+The uncertainty as to diagnosis is still greater in those cases which,
+according to v. Graefe, were to be designated as dynamic relative
+divergence; cases in which with parallel visual axes a disturbed
+balance is not present but occurs on convergence in such a way that the
+interni only perform their destined work with difficulty, and are
+nevertheless urged on in the interest of binocular single vision, till
+they give way in painful fatigue.
+
+According to v. Graefe the diagnosis of this condition must be carried
+out in the following way. First of all the convergence must be fixed on
+a near object in the median line; if one eye remains behind in the
+movement it may be accounted for in various ways, for example, the
+impediment of movement caused by the change in form of the eye in myopia
+or the faulty innervation of the interni mentioned on p. 54. In both
+cases for the most part no dynamic, but manifest relative divergence is
+present in viewing near objects. It may also happen that the patient
+does not converge sufficiently, merely because accommodation is absent.
+This experiment does not then prove the presence of dynamic relative
+convergence, and v. Graefe came to the conclusion, therefore, that a
+normal position of the eyes obtained only by the habit of binocular
+single vision must be relinquished so soon as we cause binocular single
+vision to cease. Just as under these circumstances dynamic absolute
+divergence is manifested in the observance of distant objects, so must
+this be the case in dynamic relative divergence in the observance of
+near objects. One eye is first excluded while looking at an object about
+25 cm. distant, to determine whether it still remains in a proper
+position for fixation. We have reason to believe that the position which
+occurs in the excluded eye answers to the given conditions of tension of
+the muscles. Still it is not necessary to cause binocular vision quite
+to cease, it is sufficient and even more advantageous, simply to make
+binocular single vision impossible, which we are able to do by means of
+prisms. If, for example, a point be fixed lying at the usual distance
+for work of 25 to 30 cm., or, according to v. Graefe, a large spot
+intersected by a vertical line, and one then applies a vertically
+deviating prism to one eye, the influence of binocular single vision on
+the ocular muscles is removed, as the fusion of the double images
+standing above one another is impossible; and nothing prevents the
+assumption of a relative position of divergence instead of a proper
+convergent one; as a result of this the double images show a crossed
+lateral position as well as the difference in height produced by the
+prism. The extent of this lateral deviation may be measured by means of
+prisms, which being applied to the eyes with the bases inwards place the
+double images again perpendicularly above one another. Von Graefe holds
+it to be of importance to determine the strongest prisms which can be
+overcome for the given distance by means of convergence and by the
+outward movement of the eyes.
+
+On the strength of this method of inquiry there is a prevalence of
+opinion that the asthenopic disorders common in myopia are caused by
+over-exertion of the ocular muscles; indeed people believe this so
+strongly that they assume the presence of muscular asthenopia even in
+individuals in whom the habit of working with relative divergence is
+already firmly rooted. Relative divergence may perchance cause annoyance
+through double images, though this really seldom happens, but it can
+never cause muscular asthenopia, for the internal recti muscles protect
+themselves by means of relative divergence from any stronger exertion.
+
+Asthenopic disturbances are certainly frequent in myopia, but the above
+method of inquiry does not at all prove that their cause lies in the
+ocular muscles, for those appearances from which one concludes dynamic
+relative divergence and muscular asthenopia, are found in almost all
+myopes, even when the latter have no asthenopic troubles, for they owe
+their origin to the nature of the myopia. Myopes learn to converge to
+the distance of their far point, without exerting the accommodation; if
+we now cause a point at this distance to be fixed and then exclude one
+eye, or make binocular fusion impossible by means of vertical prisms,
+what imaginable reason is there for the excluded eye to remain in proper
+fixation? In emmetropia the habitual relation between accommodation and
+convergence will be able to ensure that the excluded eye also remains
+covering the fixed object, convergently as well as accommodatively; in
+myopia, every discretionary relative divergence up to parallelism of the
+lines of vision is perfectly justified, because no effort of the
+accommodation takes place. How in the world can it be held to be
+pathological that a movement of convergence does not occur, when one has
+just artificially removed all those physiological conditions which could
+possibly have brought it about? If one now likes, as v. Graefe proposes,
+to determine the prisms, which can be overcome by means of the outward
+movement, there is no doubt about the fact, that with the aid of prisms
+the lines of vision may be made parallel or even divergent, the retinal
+images indeed, always retaining the same distinctness, in so far as they
+are not injured by the prismatic diffusion of colours. There is just as
+little reason why the convergence usually attainable should not also be
+restored by the aid of prisms with the bases outwards, the retinal
+images are not only impaired by the prisms, but the accommodation united
+with the convergence, no longer corresponds to the real distance of the
+fixed point.
+
+Enough, all these incidents, which are to prove the presence of muscular
+asthenopia in myopia, occur when the investigation is carried out as
+usual in the region of the far point, entirely on a physiological basis,
+and must not therefore be held to be pathological without further proof.
+
+The proof of muscular asthenopia in slight degrees of myopia,
+emmetropia, or hypermetropia, is somewhat more certain; a deviation from
+physiological laws is certainly present, if we find that the
+corresponding convergence does not unite itself with the accommodation
+for a near object, we must be quite sure that an exact accommodation for
+the fixed point is also really present. It by no means follows because
+one causes a large black spot to be observed at a distance of 25 to 30
+cm., that an exact accommodation takes place; one can see these things
+even with circles of diffusion, the retinal images are already dimmed by
+means of the prisms, and one can easily convince one's self that, on the
+renunciation of clear retinal images, normal eyes can reach every
+attainable convergence or relative divergence by means of prisms.
+Insufficient accommodation and defective convergence are, however,
+easily caused by all painful sensations situated near the eye, which
+make the accommodation uncomfortable and fatiguing. This applies to
+every common head- or tooth-ache, and in the same manner to disturbances
+arising in the conjunctiva, or which depend on the stretching of the
+collective tunics of the eye in myopia, or which allow any other
+so-called "nervous" origin to be suspected.
+
+We must place the same claims to the diagnosis of muscular asthenopia as
+to that of the accommodative form. Just as the latter is only detected
+if convex glasses really give the expected relief, so the proof of
+muscular asthenopia is only furnished when relief to the interni is
+brought about by means of the appropriate remedies. For myopes, who do
+not fall back on the aid of relative divergence, notwithstanding that
+they possess a clear field of vision only attainable with difficulty
+through convergence, it is the simplest plan to remove the far point to
+about 25 to 30 cm. by specially adapted concave glasses. If only slight
+myopia or none at all is present, but the relation between accommodation
+and convergence is disturbed, the latter can be corrected by means of
+prisms with the bases inwards--to be sure, only in a slight degree, as
+prisms of more than 4° are scarcely suited for spectacles, partly on
+account of their weight and partly on account of the diffusion of
+colours. Prisms may be ground with concave or convex surfaces, according
+to the requirements of refraction or accommodation.
+
+Finally, if an elastic preponderance of the externi can be proved by
+means of considerable facultative divergence, the same may be lessened
+by tenotomy of one or both externi; still after my own experience I
+cannot advise the performance of this operation unless prisms of at
+least 16° are overcome by absolute divergence, for I have seen many
+patients in other practices who have acquired convergent squint and
+diplopia for distance as the sole result of the operation, while the
+asthenopic troubles for near objects continue. The proof that it is not
+a case of muscular asthenopia is sometimes only obtained by the
+operation.
+
+
+
+
+BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT.
+
+
+The fact that those who squint do not as a rule have diplopia, while
+squints depending on paralysis of the ocular muscles are combined with
+diplopia, was difficult to explain as long as the view was adhered to of
+identical retinal areas founded on anatomical construction. The first
+explanation hit upon was that a false identity became established, an
+inequality of the retinæ; were this the case diplopia must of necessity
+occur on correction of the squint by tenotomy.
+
+Commencing with the assumption of a congenital identity which led under
+all circumstances to the occurrence of diplopia as soon as the images of
+the same object fell in both eyes upon non-identical points of the
+retinæ, the hypothesis was next advanced that the image of the squinting
+eye was not perceived, that a constant suppression of the sensations in
+the squinting eye took place. Suppression of sense-impressions does take
+place; as soon as our attention is entirely engrossed upon anything, we
+are in a position to disregard the impressions upon all other organs of
+sense; they do not reach our consciousness. That visual sensations are
+easily disregarded may be proved by experiments. Hold a small plane
+mirror obliquely before one eye, with the brim pressed into the angle of
+the nose so that the objects lying at the side and behind are seen in
+the mirror. If the other eye is now used to read with, it is quite easy
+to disregard the objects seen in the mirror provided that our attention
+is not attracted to places by a particularly bright light. No doubt
+those who squint also possess this physiological power, and it is
+therefore certain that they make use of it under certain circumstances;
+but the suppression theory necessitates that they should constantly and
+always do so, since diplopia is bound to occur directly they do not do
+it.
+
+The absence of double vision is in fact the only evidence that can be
+adduced in favour of the exclusion theory; this negative fact, however,
+proves nothing, and is, moreover, capable of other explanations, as soon
+as one abandons the theory of congenital retinal identity. The
+examination of those who squint demonstrates the untenability of this
+theory. People who squint seldom complain of diplopia, but double images
+can be rendered apparent in a comparatively large proportion of cases,
+usually with the greatest ease, by covering the best eye with a red
+glass and squinting with a vertically deviating prism. Many squinters
+now admit the presence of double images, but their position by no means
+corresponds to the identity theory, their lateral displacement is far
+too slight, or patients find themselves unable to localise the position
+of the image. It sometimes happens that alternating vision with both
+eyes is mistaken for diplopia, the images are then invariably specified
+as homonymous; however, with attention it is easy to distinguish this
+alternating vision from the simultaneous perception of two images of one
+and the same object.
+
+There can be no doubt that in most cases the position of the double
+images does not correspond to the principle of identity, and just as
+little doubt that one to whom double images are easily made apparent
+cannot possess the confirmed habit of always suppressing the image of
+the squinting eye. A certain number of cases remain in which it is
+impossible to produce diplopia; that these, however, do not constantly
+suppress the image of the squinting eye may be proved in the very simple
+way I have indicated. An object of fixation is placed in a darkened
+room, on one side of and behind the squinting eye is placed a small
+flame, the reflection of which, by means of a plane mirror before the
+squinting eye is thrown upon its retina. The reflection of the flame is
+seen on the cornea of the squinting eye, by slight rotation of the glass
+it can be brought into the area of the pupil, and at the same instant
+the patient sees the light, the reflection of which can easily be made
+to coincide with the image of the fixation object seen by the other eye.
+The experiment has then an entirely objective basis, it always succeeds,
+a fact on which I lay special stress, even in eyes whose vision is very
+defective; therefore here also the habit of suppression of the retinal
+images of the squinting eye is not present.
+
+That the squinting eye really possesses its full share of the visual
+field can easily be proved (especially in divergent squint) by the aid
+of a perimeter. The best eye is covered with a red glass, so that the
+objects projected from the fixation point, as well as the excentric
+field of vision of this eye, appear red. As soon as the test object
+moves towards the side of the squinting eye and enters the visual area
+covered by the latter, it appears in its natural white colour, and this
+in most cases before it has reached the centre of the retina of this
+eye.
+
+Another proof that the squinting eye is really used for vision appears
+to me to lie in the fact that persons who squint, provided of course
+that the vision of the eye concerned is not very defective, do not show
+that uncertainty in the estimation of distance, which is apt to prove so
+troublesome to those who have only monocular vision.
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 1.]
+
+If, then, the view of the constant suppression of the retinal images of
+the squinting eye is untenable, how is it to be explained that squint as
+the result of paralysis of the ocular muscles causes diplopia, while
+concomitant squint does not? The answer to this question is clear as
+soon as we abandon the supposition of a congenital retinal identity, and
+look instead upon the relation of the eyes to each other as harmonious;
+identity, or co-ordination as something acquired. Central fixation is
+congenital and depends upon anatomical conditions, for as the macula
+lutea is anatomically the most perfect part of the retina, it is natural
+that the new-born child soon learns to place this part of the retina
+opposite objects which attract its attention, and therefore those
+relations of the eyes to each other are naturally developed. For
+instance, if both eyes (Fig. 1) are directed to the distant point _a_,
+the image of point _b_, situated at the same distance, will fall on the
+inner half of the retina of the left eye; the left eye will now learn by
+experience to refer inner retinal images to objects lying to the left of
+the fixation point; at the same time, however, with binocular fixation,
+the right eye learns to seek the images of the temporal half of its
+retina in the left field of vision, and _vice versâ_. From this it is
+easy to trace the laws of binocular diplopia. For example, let _a_ in
+Fig. 2 be the fixation point, while at the same time the image of _b_
+belongs in both eyes to the temporal half of the retina. Now, as we have
+already seen, the right eye has learnt to refer temporal retinal images,
+to objects lying to the left of the fixation point, while for the same
+reasons the left eye projects temporal images to the right. While then
+point _a_ is seen binocularly singly, point _b_ appears double, and
+certainly the image of the right eye is projected to the left of the
+fixation point, and that of the left eye to the right of it, in other
+words, crossed diplopia is present. But the eyes are divergent relative
+to point _b_; double images then which occur as a result of divergence
+(whether relative or absolute) must appear crossed, and one will easily
+be able to infer that for the same reasons those double images which
+occur in consequence of convergence, must be homonymous. All this,
+however, only with the presupposition, that the habit of binocular
+fixation is already fully developed; any disturbance of the same, in
+whatever way (by prisms, mechanical displacement of the eyes, paralyses
+of the ocular muscles, or by those forms of squint which arise after
+childhood is past) causes the double images to illustrate the law above
+explained. Certainly diplopia may be absent even then, but only in very
+rare instances. Now and then this happens in objectively proved ailments
+of the ocular muscles, where the patients complain of disturbed vision,
+which disappears immediately on the exclusion of one eye (see Case 12),
+a method of relief they usually discover for themselves; thus the
+indistinct vision is seen at once to be a disturbance of binocular
+vision. Many such patients learn to see the double images which formerly
+escaped them, after they have been instructed how to do so during the
+examination. With others, all efforts are in vain, it is impossible to
+render them conscious of the double images, notwithstanding that the
+presence of the binocular disturbance of vision proves that the habit of
+binocular fixation exists. This apparent contradiction is explained, if
+one reflects that the physiological basis of vision rests on a series of
+conclusions. The first thing which strikes us as a result of binocular
+fixation is, that the images of the centres of the retinæ may be
+referred to one and the same region of the room, and this experience
+will be retained, even if the images on the centres of the retinæ
+represent different objects in consequence of paralysis of the ocular
+muscles; the images are notwithstanding referred to one and the same
+part of the room, all objects are thrown together promiscuously, and the
+consequent embarrassment is of course removed directly one eye is shut.
+The experience of those patients whom it is impossible to render
+conscious of double images, despite the habit of binocular fixation,
+reaches up to this point. A second conclusion belongs to diplopia, and
+for that it is necessary to seek out from the confusion of objects, the
+two retinal images belonging to one and the same object, and the
+majority of people, though not all, take this second step also. It is
+seen at the same time that the opinion held by Donders, that diplopia is
+absent in squint, does not suffice, for this reason, because the image
+in the deviating eye is too excentric. What becomes then of the image
+lying in the centre of the retina?
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
+
+The absence of diplopia in squint may be explained quite simply by the
+fact that the habit of binocular fixation has not been learnt or has
+been forgotten; one can learn nothing that cannot be again forgotten.
+The normal fusion of the visual fields can only develop in consequence
+of binocular fixation, and diplopia is only possible when some kind of
+binocular fusion exists. If no binocular fusion exists, then all
+possibility of diplopia is excluded. And why should those who squint
+from their earliest childhood not see well with both eyes, but yet with
+each separately, just as is the case with animals with laterally placed
+eyes? For example, in Fig. 3 there is convergent squint of the left eye,
+the right eye fixes the point a, whose retinal image is cast at _a_' in
+the left eye; the direction outwards in which these images are projected
+is discovered by drawing a straight line from _a_ to _c_ (the optical
+centre of the eye); suffice it to say that point _a_ is seen by each eye
+in the direction in which it really stands.
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 3.]
+
+But although both eyes see at the same time, yet the close relation
+which in binocular fixation develops between the centres of the retinæ
+does not occur in squint; firstly, because the retinal area in the
+squinting eye which corresponds to the fixation point is too excentric,
+and secondly, because the angle of the squint often changes. In
+binocular fixation, the fixation point of one retina answers to the
+corresponding point of the other; in squint, on account of the varying
+size of the squint angle, if a like relation develops between the eyes,
+the fixation point of one retina must correspond to a larger area of the
+other. Possibly this explains a fact that is often to be observed. In
+those cases of squint where diplopia can easily be caused by covering
+one eye with a red glass and the other with a vertically deviating
+prism, the double images disappear on rotation of the prism round the
+axis of vision, as soon as the angle of the prism reaches an angle of
+about 45°. The occurrence of double images shows that there exists for
+the upper and lower parts of the retinæ a community of vision by no
+means coinciding with the identity principle. The disappearance of the
+diplopia can be explained by the fact that the variations of the squint
+angle take place chiefly in the horizontal direction. Therefore the area
+in the squinting eye that corresponds to the fovea centralis of the
+fixing eye must be more extensive in the horizontal than in the vertical
+direction. Alfred Graefe has designated this phenomenon as "regional
+exclusion." Whilst then a sort of community of vision exists for the
+upper and lower parts of the retinæ, the sensations of the retinal area
+lying in the horizontal plane of the macula lutea of the squinting eye
+must be suppressed. The physiological occurrence of a suppression of the
+retinal images, as far as we are able to investigate it, always refers
+to the whole retina; however, the possibility of a "regional exclusion"
+should not be excluded to begin with; but in the inductive sciences it
+is for us to ask first, whether an incident really happens, and not
+whether it is possible. The fact from which Alfred Graefe draws his
+inference is not, as we have just seen, to be explained in any other
+way, and the ophthalmoscopic test described on p. 65 proves that also in
+these cases of "regional exclusion" both eyes are used for vision.
+
+In many cases of periodic squint the condition of binocular vision is
+very interesting. Binocular fusion may be quite absent even in normal
+position of the eyes; on the other hand the non-occurrence of diplopia
+in squint does not prevent the occurrence of perfect binocular fusion
+with a normal position. In periodic outward squint I have sometimes seen
+binocular fixation without the existence of binocular fusion; the
+excluded eye deviates outwards, but as soon as it is free it puts itself
+into fixation, whilst neither with prisms nor stereoscope can anything
+other than alternating vision be proved, _i. e._ neither binocular
+diplopia nor fusion.
+
+If squint arises when the habit of binocular single vision has become
+confirmed, diplopia is always present, at least at first; even children
+of six to seven years old make this statement uninvited, but they soon
+get accustomed to the new relations, and after a short time it is
+impossible to make them see double images (see Case 42). Habits cling
+more closely in adults, therefore that form of convergent squint in
+particular, which usually develops quickly in myopia of average degree,
+causes annoying diplopia to last for a longer time. For just when these
+patients want to employ binocular vision in order to estimate distance
+correctly, diplopia occurs to hinder and confuse them.
+
+It is otherwise with the relative divergence which is developed in
+consequence of myopia. At first diplopia is present here for a short
+time; in this case circumstances are specially favorable to a temporary
+suppression of the deviating eye; the fixing eye receives large distinct
+images to which the attention is directed. Meanwhile the relatively
+divergent eye is usually turned to other more distant objects that
+furnish indistinct retinal images, from which the attention is easily
+diverted. The habit of suppression may become so dominant that binocular
+fixation continues to exist for distant objects and the presence of
+binocular fusion is easily traceable, while for near objects, which are
+monocularly fixed with relative divergence, it is impossible to render
+the patient conscious of the images of the deviating eye.
+
+Considerable squint is by no means necessary for the cessation of normal
+binocular single vision; slight, frequently recurring deviations are
+quite sufficient, as in those cases where want of control renders
+physiological innervation for convergence more difficult. Double images
+are present here, although not in a troublesome way, as is usual in
+relative divergence, but binocular single vision does not exist even for
+distance. The reason for this does not lie in the impossibility of
+fixing the same object simultaneously with both eyes, for the
+objectively proved deviation may be extremely slight. A union cannot be
+obtained even by prisms. If crossed double images are present close
+together, a prism of a few degrees base inwards suffices to make them
+homonymous. The habit of binocular single vision is lost, in consequence
+of that disturbance to the innervation of the interni which is
+designated as insufficiency of the same.
+
+The stereoscope, as well as the prism, is useful for testing binocular
+single vision, especially when it is suitably modified for the purpose.
+The prismatic glasses usually attached to stereoscopes are here quite
+superfluous. The advantage of the prismatic deviation consists solely in
+the fact that the centres of the images fixed for the macula lutea on
+each side can be removed farther from one another than the distance
+apart of the eyes amounts to, so that a greater extension of the visual
+area is rendered possible. Ordinary stereoscopic pictures are quite
+useless for testing binocular vision; it is a question here of employing
+diagrams, which contain on the one hand very prominent identical figures
+stimulating binocular fusion but which, on the other hand, offer for
+each eye special attractions not present in the visual field of the
+other. Further, it is desirable to regulate the stereoscope so that the
+glasses are not firmly inserted, but that glasses from the trial case
+may be applied according to the condition of refraction of the patient
+and the distance of the stereoscopic images.
+
+The stereoscope is generally used with the greatest advantage in those
+cases where there is no conspicuous deviation, and by testing binocular
+vision conclusions may be drawn as to whether normal binocular fusion
+exists or has disappeared in consequence of the squint.
+
+It is desirable to use both methods of investigation, that with the
+stereoscope as well as prisms, as each test has its own value. One who
+at once combines the stereoscopic fields of vision certainly has
+binocular single vision; in other cases this is only so far lost that
+the stereoscopic combination does not take place at once but only after
+some trouble. Care must be taken, especially when one eye has defective
+vision, that the corresponding visual field contains objects
+sufficiently large and easily recognisable, as very small objects which
+do not correspond to the lowered visual acuity are easily overlooked. It
+sometimes happens that both fields are seen at the same time, but that
+there is no fusion; finally it happens frequently that there is complete
+suppression of one visual field. In testing with prisms it may appear
+doubtful as to whether binocular fusion or suppression of one eye
+exists; however, the stereoscope at once gives us certain information.
+It must not be forgotten that the altered relations between the eyes,
+which are always possible in squint, also appear at the same time; he
+who sees double with prisms, may yet be able completely to suppress the
+stereoscopic visual field of one eye. Binocular fusion, suppression of
+the squinting eye and simultaneous vision with both eyes without
+binocular fusion can alternate in the same individual. Von Kries has
+come to the same conclusion, and if our colleague is unable to explain
+all the phenomena of binocular vision that he could observe in his own
+case, we need not be astonished if we sometimes hear from our patients
+statements that appear incomprehensible and unphysiological.
+
+At any rate it is evident that the absence of diplopia in squint can
+easily be understood, without adopting the arbitrary idea of a constant,
+habitual suppression of the image of the squinting eye.
+
+
+
+
+VISUAL ACUTENESS OF THE SQUINTING EYE.
+
+
+Whether the state of refraction or the condition of the muscular
+equilibrium is held to be the chief cause of squint, defective vision of
+one eye will always have to be acknowledged as one of the most important
+favouring circumstances; in order to cure squint it is important to have
+regard to the visual acuity of both eyes, and not only to the defective
+condition. But this is no easy matter.
+
+First it is to be observed, that most cases arise at an age when an
+objective determination of refraction is possible, but when the visual
+acuteness cannot be determined. Even in children who have received
+slight instruction, it is frequently difficult to distinguish whether
+imperfect knowledge of the letters or faulty visual acuteness is the
+cause of the non-recognition of the test-letters; when testing the
+vision of children it is often better to use figures than letters.
+
+Further, in these cases it is much to be desired that the habit of
+determining the refraction and visual acuteness at the same time should
+be discontinued, particularly in reduced visual acuteness, as the
+test-tables only contain a few letters, which have to be recognised at a
+distance of 5 to 6 metres. If they have once been read with one eye it
+may easily happen that in testing the second eye they are repeated from
+memory, without being clearly recognised; even a child soon learns the
+few letters by heart. Therefore, when it has been a case of determining
+the visual acuteness I have always conducted the examination at a
+distance of one metre, as the choice of letters or figures which can be
+employed at this distance is much larger than for greater distances. In
+every case the reading of test-letters must be used as an additional
+means of examination. We must never forget that the test of vision is a
+perfectly subjective examination, and that we are obliged first of all
+to accept the statements of patients as they are given without knowing
+what they are worth. I have met with patients in the most highly
+educated classes of society who, in intra-ocular troubles, for example,
+hæmorrhage of the retinal artery in the macula lutea, could not
+distinguish the largest type in the first examination, and the next day
+(perhaps with slight difficulty) could read small print.
+
+Such inaccuracies may continue to exist during repeated examinations and
+for long periods. One of my patients, for instance, who first came under
+treatment in the year 1873, had extreme myopia in the left eye with good
+visual acuity; with the right eye, which was also myopic, and had
+suffered for several years from choroiditis of the macula lutea he could
+read only No. 20 Snellen, and a year later 7-1/2 was read with
+difficulty, word by word. Choroiditis of the macula lutea gradually
+developed in the left eye, and in the same proportion the statements as
+to visual acuteness of the right eye improved, so that finally at the
+end of 1881, 0·5 was read with difficulty with this eye, while the left
+still sufficed to read 0·4 (at about 5 cm.). As I tried to comfort the
+patient, who was very anxious about his left eye, with the fact that the
+right eye had considerably improved in the course of the year, he
+replied that he might previously have seen just as well with the right
+eye if he had only taken the trouble, this was certainly my own opinion.
+
+The attention and intelligence shown by patients during examination
+materially influences its results, and one should never hold the first
+trial of vision to be conclusive. We must always remember, however, that
+all conclusions drawn from visual acuteness become more unreliable in
+proportion as the latter is slight. We must attend to some peculiar
+difficulties in testing the vision of those who squint or we shall be
+liable to make great mistakes. When testing the squinting eye,
+particularly in children, it is not sufficient merely to cover the other
+or to hold the hand over it, for they know how to bring the usual eye
+into fixation by holding the head on one side or peeping between the
+fingers; we must keep it carefully closed with a bandage.
+
+It is still more frequently the case that visual acuteness is stated to
+be less than it is in reality. The result of always using the better eye
+for fixation is, that fixation is not learnt with the weaker one. Even
+where there is no squint we see very frequently that in one-sided
+hypermetropia the accommodation is only used in that proportion which
+has become habitual to the emmetropic eye and does not therefore suffice
+to produce clear retinal images, while good visual acuteness is obtained
+by means of the correcting convex glasses. In the case of squinters
+(even without difference of refraction) it happens very frequently that
+the first statements as to the visual power are considerably below the
+truth. Patients who assert that they can only read the largest print
+with difficulty, frequently read smaller, and even the smallest type
+without more trouble, and we must be careful to ascertain this at first.
+Accurate reports are usually obtained more quickly by means of convex
+glasses or eserine. In any case insufficient accommodation is, according
+to this, one of the difficulties, but not the only one, which has to be
+overcome before the squinting eye can be put into fixation. We can
+understand that the innervation necessary for distinct vision can be set
+aside even without loss of visual acuteness, just as we see the movement
+of convergence disappear without the interni losing their capacity for
+contraction.
+
+In order to explain the relation between squint and defective vision,
+we must first consider the question hitherto neglected, or what is
+worse, answered with preconceived opinion, as to whether the same form
+of defective sight which is so common in squint also occurs without
+squint. No one doubts the existence of congenital amblyopia,
+nevertheless it has received but little attention in the handbooks on
+ophthalmology. Leber, for instance (in the well-known compilation, vol.
+v), does not mention it at all.
+
+A more or less considerable reduction of visual acuteness, with good
+field of vision, normal sense of colour and normal ophthalmoscopic
+condition, are characteristic of congenital amblyopia. Colour-blindness
+may of course be present at the same time. I also hold as probable the
+very rare occurrence of congenital defects of the visual field in good
+central vision, but I will reserve for the present the few observations
+I possess on the subject.
+
+Together with congenital defective vision we must consider the
+depreciation in visual acuteness usually present in nystagmus, although
+it might be asserted that it can neither be the cause nor the result of
+the nystagmus, for we find very considerable degrees of congenital
+defective sight in both eyes without nystagmus, as well as nystagmus
+with remarkably good visual acuteness. Not to complicate the question,
+however, I have excluded all cases of nystagmus from the following
+investigation. All cases of myopia of higher degree (_i. e._ of more
+than 6 D.) have also been excluded, as in such cases for various
+well-known reasons the full visual acuteness is never present. In the
+case of individual patients who remained for years under my observation
+I have been able to convince myself that visual acuteness decreased in
+accordance with the increase of myopia; on the other hand, however, it
+appeared to me very probable that just those cases of myopia, which from
+the beginning do not possess full visual acuteness, have a special
+tendency to increase quickly.
+
+For instance, if the examination of a hypermetropic eye, whose defect
+can be exactly determined by means of the ophthalmoscope, shows very
+faulty visual acuteness which is but slightly or not at all improved on
+correction of the hypermetropia, it is clear that the cause of defective
+sight is not to be sought in the hypermetropia. It is just the same with
+astigmatism. In defective vision with astigmatism proved by means of the
+ophthalmoscope, how frequently it is the case that not even the
+slightest improvement can be obtained with cylindrical glasses. This is
+usually attributed to the presence of an irregular astigmatism situated
+near the asymmetric meridian. If we illuminate the eye by means of a
+plane mirror, and observe one spot on the pupillary area which looks
+sometimes bright, sometimes dark, during slight rotations of the glass,
+this appearance can only be caused by the above-mentioned irregularity
+of the refraction of light, and it will be easy to determine whether the
+same takes place in the cornea or in the lens. But if this appearance is
+not present then irregular astigmatism cannot be proved. It is purely
+intentional, or a play upon words, if we refer an existing defective
+sight to an optic cause which cannot be proved. For instance, if
+haziness of the cornea exists, it is not difficult to learn to estimate
+by practical experience whether the amount of visual disturbance
+corresponds to the optic irregularities caused by the opacities and
+irregular refraction of the cornea. Slightly nebulous corneæ with
+disproportionately bad vision were therefore included in the following
+statistics; however, they do not influence the result as there are only
+ten cases in all. On the other hand, considerable opacity of the corneæ
+or cases which were complicated with anterior synechia, &c., were
+excluded from the statistics.
+
+If then we find defective vision, the development of which has not been
+noticed by the patient, together with normal ophthalmoscopic condition
+and full visual field, and if it is further seen that the condition
+remains unchanged for years, we have every reason for considering the
+defective sight to be congenital. The statements of patients must of
+course be received with caution. If congenital amblyopia of moderate
+degree exists in both eyes, patients do not usually know that it is
+possible for anyone to see better; if the congenital defect is one
+sided, it is generally only casually noticed on closing the better eye.
+We can scarcely doubt that it is a case of congenital amblyopia if it
+happens in children. Acquired defective sight without ophthalmoscopic
+cause seldom occurs among children. I have seen a few cases as a result
+of severe cerebral disease (hydrocephalus, for example); so-called
+anæsthesia retinæ, or amblyopia marked by contraction of the visual
+field is not quite so rare. It is easy to avoid confounding both these
+cases with congenital amblyopia.
+
+One must be more careful about drawing conclusions with regard to
+adults, for on the one hand it happens that gradually developed
+monocular visual disturbances are only accidentally observed by patients
+after they have reached a high degree, and it is very difficult then to
+persuade these attentive observers that it is not a case of sudden
+blindness of one eye. (Only a few people seem to be really aware that
+they have two eyes, and still fewer appear to suspect the existence of a
+visual field.)
+
+In all these cases opportunity is hardly given for mistakes with
+reference to the diagnosis of congenital amblyopia, as slowly developed
+monocular defect scarcely occurs without ophthalmoscopic cause. On the
+other hand, ophthalmoscopic symptoms (such as hæmorrhage of the retinal
+artery in the macula lutea) may disappear without leaving a trace, while
+defective vision remains. The law of habit, however, usually helps us
+here. In congenital monocular defect patients are generally accustomed
+to this condition, and only notice it when special claim is made on the
+visual faculty of this eye,--he, on the other hand, who is accustomed
+to see with two equally good eyes, may not observe a gradually occurring
+blindness of one eye, if his talent of observation be faulty, but I have
+never had reason to suppose that a rapid depreciation of the central
+visual acuteness of one eye is also overlooked. Rapidly occurring
+monocular visual disturbances are noticed, whether detected with or
+without the ophthalmoscope.
+
+Two peculiarities appear in isolated cases of congenital amblyopia,
+which may render the testing of vision difficult: rapid fatigue of the
+retina, and depreciation of the central visual acuteness in such a way,
+that an adjoining part of the retina possesses a better visual faculty
+than the centre.
+
+Rapid fatigue of the retina occurs in comparatively good visual
+acuteness. For example:
+
+CASE 16.--Mr. W--, æt. 35, came under treatment for conjunctivitis. In
+testing the vision, emmetropia (or doubtful hypermetropia) was found on
+the left, V. = 5/6. Refraction of right eye similar to that of left, V.
+= 5/18 to 5/12, but with rapidly occurring fatigue of the retina.
+Patient had observed this fifteen years before, when shooting during his
+period of army service. Position and movements of the eyes are normal.
+
+This peculiarity occurs more often in higher degrees of defective
+vision. For example:
+
+CASE 17.--Mrs. von G--, æt. 60, has always seen badly with the left eye.
+On the right H. 1·25 D., V. 5/12. On the left with + 2 D., V. 1/12 with
++ 5 D. words of No. 1·75 were recognised; but the visual acuteness above
+stated is only present at the first moment; after a few seconds
+everything disappears in a fog. The left eye has a slightly conical
+nebulous cornea, detected only on focal illumination, which does not,
+however, cause the slightest irregular astigmatism, and cannot,
+therefore, serve as explanation of the defective sight.
+
+This rapid fatigue, which only permits the visual acuity present to be
+estimated for a short period at a time, may easily result in the visual
+acuity being supposed to be worse than it is.
+
+The other phenomenon above mentioned, which occurs in defective vision
+without being actually a necessary symptom, is the depreciation of the
+central visual acuity, which we designate as central scotoma in acquired
+amblyopia. It should be remembered that the visual acuteness which we
+determine under these conditions is something different from what we are
+usually accustomed to designate by this idea. When we simply talk of
+visual acuity we always imply the central visual acuity; however, in
+cases where the centre of the retina is so injured in its function, that
+the peripheral parts lying near are too often called into requisition,
+we do not determine the central visual acuity at all, but that of the
+nearest and at the same time best, excentric part. We cannot prevent
+patients from using that part of the retina which seems best to them for
+recognising the test objects. In such cases (just as in acquired central
+scotoma) continuous print is read badly, and with more trouble than one
+would expect from the visual acuteness which is specified in the
+recognition of single letters. Of course spelling and reading are two
+different things; the excentric visual acuity may perfectly suffice for
+the recognition of single letters, central and also excentric visual
+acuity is necessary for reading. There are patients who, despite full
+visual acuteness, are unable to read continuously, as soon as a defect
+in the right half of the visual field extends close to the fixation
+point. To read fluently, the excentric vision must work on in advance
+for the width of several letters, but if the first letter is seen
+excentrically, the excentric visual acuteness rapidly sinking in a
+physiological way, does not suffice for the following ones.
+
+When testing the vision these circumstances should be carefully
+regarded. The apparent contradiction between the visual acuteness
+specified with test-letters, and the uncertainty in reading continuous
+print, may be taken for simulation (I have seen some sad examples of
+this in acquired central scotoma), and, on the other hand, if in the
+form of defective vision now under discussion we content ourselves by
+merely employing reading tests, we take the visual acuteness to be worse
+than it is, or than we find it later when single test-letters are used,
+for even though excentric, it is yet always visual acuteness. The
+excentricity of that part of the retina put into fixation is usually so
+slight, that the oblique direction of the visual axis cannot be seen
+with the naked eye; if considerable and extensive defect of the centre
+of the retina is present, either varying fixation occurs, sometimes
+parts lying to the nasal and sometimes to the temporal side are put into
+fixation; or excentric fixation exists; an inner retinal area but
+sometimes also a temporal then usually has comparatively the best visual
+acuteness.
+
+A third peculiarity which sometimes occurs in extreme degrees of
+congenital amblyopia, is monocular nystagmus of the weak eye. This
+trembling may be so slight that it is only observable during
+investigation with the ophthalmoscope; in other cases it is most marked
+as soon as the weak eye is put into fixation by exclusion of the sound
+one.
+
+Cases of congenital amblyopia in both eyes, where no explanatory cause
+can be traced, and no nystagmus is present, are rare, but all the more
+interesting. For instance:
+
+CASE 18.--Mr. F--, æt. 56, has seen badly from childhood; the visual
+acuteness of each eye singly examined amounts to 1/18 to 1/12, binocular
+1/12. No. 0·75 is read with difficulty at 8 cm. Ophthalmoscopic
+condition is normal. In mydriasis by atropine hypermetropia of 3 to 4
+dioptres results. With convex 3· 5 D. on the right V. 1/18 to 1/12, on
+the left V. 1/12, binocular V. 1/12 to 1/9, with convex 6 D. still only
+0·75 can be read, but more fluently than with the naked eyes.
+
+Normal binocular fusion may continue to exist even in extreme degrees of
+monocular weak sight; I have observed it up to a visual acuteness of
+1/24. The stereoscope is well adapted to prove binocular fusion in these
+cases; only we must then take care that sufficiently large letters are
+present in the visual field of the defective eye, so that they may
+easily be recognised with the existing visual acuteness. Binocular
+fusion is naturally rendered still more difficult if the weak-sighted
+eye is at the same time hypermetropic to a high degree, as it then
+receives simultaneously indistinct retinal images on account of the
+difference of refraction; and yet in the above table there are 117 cases
+with hypermetropia of at least 2 D. in the better eye, and faulty visual
+acuteness in the other, 7 with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V.
+1/12, and 9 with less than 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+
+In the highest degrees of congenital defective vision, binocular fusion
+cannot as a rule be proved; partly because the methods of investigation
+by which we are able to prove binocular fusion presuppose the existence
+of a sufficient visual acuteness. On the other hand, it cannot be
+expected that normal binocular vision can be learnt with such a large
+amount of monocular defective vision. If the relative strength of the
+muscles is normal, so also are the position and movements of the eyes,
+if elastic preponderance on the part of the muscles is present, which in
+monocular defective vision of considerable degree is no longer governed
+by binocular fusion, and this is frequently the case, squint is
+developed.
+
+Sometimes other congenital anomalies are present at the same time with
+congenital defective vision (for example, congenital dermoid growths on
+the edge of the cornea), and undoubtedly hereditary influences play a
+considerable rôle therein.
+
+In order to determine the relation of congenital defective vision
+without squint, to defective vision with squint, I have taken those
+cases where congenital defective vision without squint was observed,
+together with the cases of squint, from the diaries of my private
+practice for the last ten years. I have personally investigated every
+case, and the observations on each were carefully examined before being
+included in the statistics; all cases with myopia of six or more
+dioptres, all cases of double nystagmus, and, finally, all those cases
+where the previous existence of squint might be suspected, were
+excluded, as above stated. I must also remark that before the last ten
+years I had not begun to collect these cases. In order to find monocular
+congenital defective vision one must seek for it, as patients usually
+come under treatment for quite different disorders, and in the
+consulting-room there is not always time carefully to investigate what
+possesses interest for us but none for the patient. In cases of squint
+the opportunity for investigating the power of vision does not escape us
+so easily, and yet the same list, which contains among 629 patients 177
+cases of squint with a visual acuteness of 1/8 to less than 1/36,
+furnished at the same time 98 cases with undoubted congenital defective
+vision of the same high degree without squint, which I place together in
+the following review.
+
+Cases of congenital amblyopia with visual acuteness of 1/7 are so
+frequent, that I have not drawn up special statistics of them. I was not
+anxious to collect a large number of cases but only material for
+evidence. I have therefore divided the 98 cases I observed into 3
+groups. (1) Cases with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V. 1/12; (2)
+V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36; (3) visual acuteness less than 1/36. The
+limits between these groups are of course not very sharply defined, for
+what is designated as "measurement" of visual acuteness contains, even
+if we accept the statements of patients as trustworthy, not an
+inconsiderable number of sources of error; and we often find a
+remarkable absence of conformity in the analysed causes of congenital
+amblyopia, according as we seek to determine the visual acuteness by
+means of single test-letters or by reading printed matter. In a case of
+visual acuteness of 1/12 No. 0·75 with convex 6 was the smallest type
+that could be read, and that with difficulty, larger type was usually
+required; and in one case where at first only single words of No. 2·25
+were read with difficulty--this test was on that account repeated in
+myosis by eserine--No. 1·75 was finally the smallest print which could
+with the same difficulty be deciphered. In the division of the groups
+here arranged the best visual acuteness ascertained in the various
+examinations was always used as the basis.
+
+A. Vision less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 38 cases. The examination of the
+better eye showed:
+
+
+ (_a_) Emmetropia in 18 cases. A determination of refraction,
+ mostly ophthalmoscopic, of the weaker eye is submitted in 11
+ cases, which divide themselves into, 4 with emmetropia, 3
+ with hypermetropia (of H. 2 D. and 2·25 D.), 3 with
+ hypermetropic astigmatism, I with myopic astigmatism.
+
+ (_b_) Myopia in 5 cases (3 of M. 1 D. to 1·5 D., 2 of M. 4·5
+ D. and 4 D.), the condition of the defective eye was
+ determined in 3 cases, and was twice hypermetropic, once
+ astigmatic.
+
+ (_c_) Hypermetropia in 8 cases, hypermetropic astigmatism in
+ 3. In 4 cases an exact determination of refraction even of
+ the better eye was for some reason impracticable.
+
+There are 4 cases in this group where the visual acuteness in both eyes
+did not exceed the above-stated small amount, and one which was
+interesting from another point of view.
+
+CASE 19.--Max L--, æt. 8-1/2, recognises No. 24, and a few letters of 18
+at 5 metres with the better eye with convex 6 D.; at 1 metre V. 1/4 to
+1/3, the left eye recognises only No. 60 at 5 m. with + 6 D. at 1 m. No.
+0·75 is read with difficulty. If we exclude one eye it lapses into now
+less, now greater convergence, and still no squint is present, but
+diplopia as well as binocular fusion can be proved by the aid of prisms.
+The theory of Donders that squint is less frequent in hypermetropia of
+high degree because too strong convergence would not suffice to furnish
+clear retinal images, is scarcely tenable in the face of such cases. If
+indistinct retinal images are added to a visual acuteness of only 1/3 to
+1/4 still, even with faulty accommodation, it is difficult to believe
+how a child could learn to read if it did not hold the book close to its
+eyes, which was not the case here, and indeed seldom happens. Therefore,
+in spite of defective vision the accommodation must have sufficed,
+without sacrificing binocular fusion, whilst in all probability
+accommodative convergence followed on exclusion of one eye.
+
+B. 48 cases had visual acuteness from 1/12 to 1/36. The better eye was--
+
+ (_a_) Emmetropic in 16 cases; in 6 of them the refraction of
+ the defective eye was determined, which showed in one case
+ emmetropia, 3 hypermetropia, 2 astigmatism.
+
+ (_b_) Myopia of the better eye was present in 7 cases (in 3
+ myopia of 1 D., in 4 M. 3 D. to 6 D.).
+
+ (_c_) Hypermetropia in 18, astigmatism in 4 cases. In 3
+ cases the condition of the better eye was, for some reason
+ or other, indeterminable.
+
+In this group I should like to point out the following cases as worthy
+of attention:
+
+CASE 20.--Margarethe T--, æt. 16, has hypermetropia 2 D. in the right
+eye, V. 5/6, in the left the ophthalmoscope shows with an otherwise
+normal condition a higher degree of hypermetropia, with + 6·5 D., V.
+1/18, with + 10 D. No. 3·0 is read. No spectacles have been used until
+now; for the past few years school tasks have been performed with a
+certain effort, only during the last year the asthenopia has increased.
+Squint is not present, and with prisms as well as with the stereoscope
+(by the use of objects, whose size corresponds to the defective sight on
+the left side) binocular fusion can be proved.
+
+The case is the same as regards divergent strabismus.
+
+CASE 21.--Mr. H--, æt. 28, has myopia 6 D., V. 6/9 in the right eye; the
+left eye has always been weak sighted, emmetropia is detected with the
+ophthalmoscope, with normal fundus, V. 1/18. No squint, binocular fusion
+can be proved with prisms.
+
+CASE 22.--Mr. B--, æt. 47, has hypermetropia 5 D., V. 5/9 in the right
+eye. Left eye with + 5 D., V. 1/18 (a few letters of 12 also were
+recognised at 1 m.). It seems, however, that the patient is not able
+exactly to indicate the position of the retinal images of his left eye,
+he does not know, as he expresses himself, "whether the letters stand
+here or there." Patient observed the defective sight long ago; the
+ophthalmoscopic condition is normal. Patient really comes on account of
+his son, aged 7-1/2, in whom hypermetropia of 3·5 dioptres is detected
+with the ophthalmoscope, right eye with + 3·5 V. 5/9. Left eye has
+convergent squint, V. 1/36, No. 3·0 is read with + 6·5 D.
+
+The hereditary tendency is seen also in the following case:
+
+CASE 23.--Mrs. S--, æt. about 46, on the left H. 4 D., V. 5/18 to 5/12,
+has used no spectacles until now, and reads No. 0·75 without glasses at
+about 15 cm. R. with + 4 D., V. 1/18, with + 6·5 D. large letters of No.
+5·0 are recognised.
+
+Two sons, present at the same time, are hypermetropic. One has in either
+eye V. 1/4, the other a slighter degree of congenital amblyopia.
+
+CASE 24.--Johanna L--, æt. 4, came under treatment for a congenital
+fibroma covered with hair, about the size of a cherry-stone, situated on
+the outer corneal margin of the left eye, which was removed. Three years
+later, when the child had learnt to read, emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness was observed in the right eye, with the left No. 4·0 only is
+read with difficulty. The ophthalmoscope shows a slight degree of
+irregular astigmatism of the cornea, which in no way explains the
+defective vision; the image of the fundus is perfectly clear and quite
+normal.
+
+CASE 25 afforded me a not altogether pleasant surprise. Martin M--, æt.
+58, has matured cataract in the right eye, with perfectly satisfactory
+light reflex, proper projection, &c. On the left progressive cloudiness
+of the lens has begun. The course of operation and cure were regular in
+every respect, but the power of vision finally was so small that with a
+clear pupillary area, and otherwise normal condition, only single words
+of No. 3·0 were recognised with difficulty at 10 to 15 cm. with convex
+20 D. For the first time the patient remembers that he noticed the
+defective sight in his right eye at the age of sixteen, and was for this
+exempt from army service. The operation performed later on the left eye
+procured satisfactory vision.
+
+
+C. Visual acuteness of less than 1/36 12 cases.
+
+Determination of refraction of the better eye is given in 6 cases, and
+showed twice emmetropia, twice slight myopia, twice hypermetropia. I
+only possess an exact ophthalmoscopic determination of the condition of
+the defective-sighted eye in one instance with H. 2·5 D.
+
+This group is of special interest in that it represents the extreme
+degrees of congenital amblyopia, and, on the other hand, because it
+contains 5 cases of children under 10 years of age.
+
+CASE 26.--Constanze von M--, æt. 9-1/2. Defective vision on the left
+side had been noticed long before by the child's parents. On May 1,
+1879, emmetropia was observed in right eye, V. 5/12 to 5/9. No. 0·4 is
+read at 15 cm. On the left, only movements of the hand are seen, fingers
+cannot be counted even when close to the eye; the visual field is good,
+that is, on moving the hand in the periphery of the visual field the
+child sees "something" without being able to state what it is. Reaction
+of the pupils as rapid and equal as usual. The ophthalmoscopic condition
+(even with dilated pupils) is perfectly normal. All tests for simulation
+were of course applied.
+
+On account of the importance of the case, I suggested another
+examination a year and a half later, on the 22nd December, 1880, which
+showed precisely the same result as the former one--optic disc, macula
+lutea, &c., perfectly normal, the ophthalmoscopic determination of the
+refraction shows H. 2·5 D.
+
+The child's father also possesses in the left eye a slight degree of
+congenital defective sight, observed for many years, with normal
+ophthalmoscopic condition; No. 0·5 is read with + 6·5 D. at 10 cm.
+
+CASE 27.--Tina S--, æt. 6. The defective sight of the left eye had been
+remarked some months previously; report on July 16th, 1878: R. full
+visual acuteness, L. movements of the hand are scarcely visible. The
+child cannot count fingers. Normal ophthalmoscopic condition. Eserine
+and separate use were prescribed. On September 9th, 1878, fingers were
+counted with the left eye at 1·5 m., single words of No. 4·0 were
+recognised, No. 3·5 with convex 6·5 D., but always with oscillating
+fixation. The improvement in the child's statements may be referred to
+the fact that she had meanwhile learnt to form right conclusions from
+the very imperfect sensual impressions of her left eye.
+
+CASE 28.--Frank J--, æt. 10. Left eye. V. 10/50 to 10/40, No. 1-1/2
+Snellen is read at 4 inches. On the right, nystagmus on fixation,
+fingers are counted at 5-6 feet. The ophthalmoscopic condition is
+normal. A sister of the boy squints.
+
+CASE 29.--Ernest G--, æt. 8, has slight nebulæ on both corneæ. On the
+left V. 15/40. On the right, fingers are counted at 4 inches with visual
+axis deviating inwards.
+
+CASE 30.--I operated on Moritz L-- for congenital cataract before he was
+a year old in 1869 by means of a needle operation. In June, 1877, a thin
+ophthalmoscopically transparent secondary cataract appeared in both
+eyes; on the left, with convex 12 D. V. 3/24 to 3/18, with convex 16 D.
+No. 0·4 is read at 10 cm. On the right, with convex 12 D., fingers are
+counted with difficulty at about 1 m., with inward deviation of visual
+axis.
+
+CASE 31 is also worthy of note. Carl H--, æt. 22, shows quite a number
+of congenital anomalies on the left side of the face, harelip, deformed
+nostril and a skin defect on the inner corner of the eyelid. There is a
+congenital dermoid growth of the size of half a pea situated on the
+inner lower corneal margin. A slight irregularity in the curve of the
+cornea near the dermoid is detected with the ophthalmoscope; the fundus
+of the eye is perfectly normal. Fingers are not counted further off than
+a metre with visual axis deviating inwards. The right eye is emmetropic
+(perhaps slightly hypermetropic), and has full visual acuteness. There
+is no squint.
+
+It is customary to "explain" these cases of monocular amblyopia by
+previously existing squint, and one is quite satisfied if by the
+examination of patients it is only possible to prove that they have
+occasionally squinted, although the advocates of the amblyopia ex
+anopsia disallow the presence of the same under these conditions, that
+is, in periodic squint. Of course a theory which cannot exist without
+the assertion that occasional alternation suffices to hinder the
+development of defective vision caused by disuse, cannot possibly hold
+periodic squint to be the cause of it. Certainly permanent squint may
+also disappear, but this much I have been able to determine, that this
+seldom happens before the twelfth year of life, and one may surely
+reckon that children in whom permanent squint is developed at the usual
+early period of life, still squint at the age of ten years. Cases 24 and
+26 to 30 can under no circumstances be explained by previous squint,
+notwithstanding that they represent the extremest degrees of amblyopia,
+but the question is undoubtedly that of congenital defective vision;
+moreover I have excluded from the statistics of congenital amblyopia all
+cases in which the previous presence of squint could even be supposed.
+
+A table of the cases above described with reference to the defective
+condition is interesting; when a determination of refraction existed for
+the weak eye I have given it, and when this was not the case I have
+stated that of the better eye, thus it is seen that among 85 cases in
+which the refraction was determined, hypermetropia (including
+hypermetropic astigmatism) was present in 39. Hypermetropia was found
+then in 47 per cent of all the cases. The percentage would probably be
+higher, if all weak-sighted eyes had been examined from the beginning as
+to their state of refraction, but as I only learnt to know the relation
+between hypermetropia and the higher degrees of congenital amblyopia
+from my statistics, I did not take notice of this relation when
+investigating individual cases.
+
+How does congenital amblyopia now stand in relation to that disturbance
+of vision which we observe in squint? I see no difference; whether
+squint is present or not, the form of defective vision is precisely the
+same, and nothing happens in the combination with squint which could not
+also be proved without it. The relation to hypermetropia, which is
+proved with congenital amblyopia, also appears in squint.
+
+A collective table of cases of convergent and divergent squint included
+in the statistics (pp. 19 and 47) shows:
+
+ (_a_) In myopia, emmetropia, and doubtful hypermetropia,
+ with convergent and divergent squint together
+ 329 cases. Among them:
+ Visual acuteness to 1/7 239
+ " less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 19
+ " " 1/12 to V. 1/36 46
+ " " 1/36 25
+ Defective sight of higher degree than 1/7, 27·3 per
+ cent.
+
+ (_b_) In hypermetropia 1 to 3 D., including the few cases
+ of hypermetropia with divergent squint, 177 cases.
+ Among them:
+ Visual acuteness to 1/7 121
+ " less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 17
+ " " 1/12 to V. 1/36 27
+ " " 1/36 12
+ Defective sight then, 31·6 per cent.
+
+ (_c_) In hypermetropia 3 D. and more, 70 cases with convergent
+ squint, with:
+ Vision to 1/7 39
+ V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12 8
+ V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36 14
+ V. < 1/36 9
+ Defective sight then, 44·2 per cent.
+
+This regular increase of defective sight with the increase of the
+hypermetropia can be no mere accident, and speaks strongly for the
+identity of defective vision in squint with congenital amblyopia. Were
+defective vision caused by the squint the various states of refraction
+would show no difference in the percentage of defective vision.
+
+Further, the circumstance is worthy of remark that among 198 cases of
+periodic squint (convergent and divergent) which are applicable for the
+statistics of visual acuteness--
+
+ 170 possess V. to 1/7.
+ 16 " V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12.
+ 9 " V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+ 3 " V. < 1/36.
+ 14·2 per cent. then of defective vision of considerable degree.
+
+That defective sight on the whole plays an influential part as a cause
+of squint is doubted by no one, indeed we see blind eyes lapse into
+squint as soon as the conditions necessary to it are supplied by the
+muscles. Of all the prevailing causes present defective vision will be
+the more decisive in proportion as it is of high degree; for the motive
+which despite the presence of favouring circumstances can prevent the
+real occurrence of squint, binocular vision, becomes less efficacious as
+the defective vision becomes more considerable. As binocular fusion
+takes place frequently in periodic squint, for a time at least, that is
+as long as proper fixation lasts, one can understand that periodic
+squint exists chiefly in cases where the visual faculty of both eyes is
+good. Even the highest degrees of congenital amblyopia are not excluded,
+for periodic squint appears where the faculty of binocular fusion has
+been completely lost. Further, that considerable congenital defective
+sight is more frequent with than without squint, may be accounted for
+quite simply by the fact that, in extreme degrees of it, binocular
+fusion cannot be learnt at all, while in the lesser degrees it is more
+easily forgotten again.
+
+If defective vision is undoubtedly one of the causes of squint, we must
+seek for the grounds upon which it has been taken to be a consequence of
+squint, and described as amblyopia ex anopsia. I will not inquire to
+whom the honour of this invention belongs. I do not want to write a
+history of mistakes but only to examine the basis of the views now
+current. The most complete record of the same may be found in the
+well-known journal on the 'Cure of Eye Diseases,' vol. v, p. 1011.
+Leber, who does not seem to recognise the existence of congenital
+amblyopia, has shown quite a special predilection for amblyopia ex
+anopsia.
+
+Amblyopia from want of use, which formerly included all possible
+disturbances to vision, great and small, is now only accepted in two
+cases, for squint and congenital cataract, if the latter is not operated
+on very early in the first or second year of life.
+
+The fact is simply this, that in congenital cataract even the most
+successful operation is frequently deceiving as to its issue without
+ophthalmoscopic report; this is the more disagreeable as the most exact
+reflection test before the operation fails to prove the existence of
+this defective sight. But does it follow from this, that congenital
+cataract has induced defective sight from want of use? We find the same
+defective vision also in congenital defective development of the
+transparent lenses (so-called luxation of the lens). On the whole, we
+often find several congenital defects in the same individual. The very
+circumstance that the cataract is congenital makes it probable that the
+defective sight is so also, or are we to take congenital cataract as
+being a guarantee against congenital amblyopia?
+
+Von Graefe, who first considered this defective sight to be congenital,
+designated it in his later lectures as originating from want of use,
+probably in order to advise the earliest possible performance of an
+operation. There is no mention of his having brought forward evidence
+for this assertion; that the great master himself said it was enough,
+and the host of believers felt themselves to be the happy possessors of
+a new dogma.
+
+A number of children appeared in my practice, in whom congenital
+cataract was needled by von Graefe in the first or second year of life
+with recovery of transparent media, who showed, however, the extremest
+degrees of defective vision when they were sufficiently intelligent to
+have their vision tested. Whoever is interested in this can find a
+number of such cases in the Royal Institution for the Blind at Steglitz,
+which I am accustomed to visit several times a year by request of the
+committee. On p. 91 I have related a case of monocular congenital
+defective sight in congenital cataract of both eyes.
+
+Everywhere then the principle holds good, that whoever makes an
+assertion must be prepared to verify it; amblyopia from non-use is
+denoted as an inherited trouble, and still not a single observation
+exists which furnishes proof that an eye of previously ascertained good
+visual acuteness has become amblyopic in consequence of disuse, a fact I
+drew attention to ten years ago. Leber replies to this, he remembers "to
+have seen patients with complete amblyopia in the squinting eye, who
+stated that its visual faculty had been found to be good during an
+examination instituted years before." Is this intended as an
+observation? By that I mean is it a proof of facts, for the
+trustworthiness of which he holds himself responsible: in the handling
+of scientific questions I do not place the least reliance on the dim
+recollections of unnamed individuals. Even in personally conducted
+examinations we must be on our guard to avoid mistakes, and now we are
+confronted with mere recollections of tests of vision!
+
+By means of the above observations the theory that "the peculiar variety
+of monocular amblyopia which is so frequent in monocular squint is
+hardly observed without squint" is sufficiently disproved.
+
+Leber seeks to enfeeble Alfred Graefe's statement that the presence of
+extremely defective vision may sometimes be proved at a very early age,
+in children who have only squinted a short time (the rapid development
+of amblyopia in consequence of the squint really appears incredible), by
+the assertion "that just at the earliest age, when the activity of the
+optic nerve is not yet sufficiently strengthened by use, the conditions
+for producing amblyopia from non-use are most favorable with complete
+exclusion of one eye," but complete exclusion of the squinting eye does
+not take place even in extremely defective sight, as can easily be seen
+by the mirror test (p. 66) I described fourteen years ago. Which
+activities of the optic nerve apparatus are strengthened then by use?
+Perhaps visual acuteness? The physiological conditions of this are only
+to be sought in the anatomical structure, and the physiological
+arrangements of the retina or the visual organs, which cannot be changed
+much by use. What we can learn from the visual act relates solely to the
+conclusions which we are able to draw from sensual impressions; but
+visual acuteness, _i. e._ the faculty for the recognition of distinct
+points, is an anatomical, physiological gift, and not a thing to be
+acquired.
+
+The opposing observation, that squint, even of monolateral character
+dating from earliest childhood, continued to the middle and later years
+of life, can still exist with very good visual faculty, may easily be
+explained by alternation from time to time. If that is so indeed, if
+squint begins during the presence of good visual acuteness, and nothing
+further is necessary to its maintenance than alternation from time to
+time, why should defective vision from non-use ever be developed? With
+good visual faculty on both sides alternations also occur from time to
+time.
+
+Still more convincing are those cases which are numerous where the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye only amounts to about 1/7 to 1/12,
+and where, on this account, there is no alternation. Were this defective
+sight acquired through non-use it must of necessity be progressive; it
+must exist in proportion to the duration of the squint. A moderate
+experience will suffice to show that this is not the case. And further,
+defective sight must continue progressive even after removal of the
+squint by operation, for by the operation nothing is changed in the
+relations of the binocular vision present in squint, which are dismissed
+with the one word, "suppression," by the advocates of defective vision
+from non-use.
+
+Moreover, suppression may exist for years without the slightest
+disadvantage to the visual faculty.
+
+CASE 32.--In November, 1873, I operated on Fritz F-- for a slight
+divergent squint of the left eye. Slight hypermetropia was present on
+both sides, and nearly full visual acuteness. In October, 1880,
+perfectly normal position of the eyes showed itself with the same visual
+acuity and emmetropia in both eyes; at the same time, however, the boy
+affirmed that when reading he could never see with his left eye but only
+with the right; in reality only the right visual field was perceived in
+the stereoscope.
+
+The second reason brought forward is, that the variety of amblyopia from
+non-use is quite a peculiar one; "it consists of a functional
+disturbance of those parts of the retina whose images belong to the
+common V. F., and are suppressed in squint in order to render vision
+distinct--the macula and the temporal and only a part of the nasal
+halves of the retina." Does this hold good for all cases of amblyopia in
+squint, or do those cases only belong to amblyopia from non-use where
+excentric fixation takes place with an inward deviating visual axis? It
+would be difficult to draw the line. I have seen a case in which the
+squinting eye possessed a visual acuteness of 5/36 together with
+excentric fixation and nystagmus; however, I attach no value to isolated
+cases. We frequently find excentric fixation with a visual acuteness of
+1/12 to 1/36. Further, those cases cannot possibly be regarded as
+results of squint, which possess unsteady oscillating fixation or
+rapidly trembling nystagmus, which occurs as soon as the squinting eye
+fixes. But this conclusion is false, even for the excentric fixation
+with visual axis deviating inwards; if it were right the angle at which
+the eye deviates inwards on fixation in convergent squint would always
+be greater than the squint angle. Those cases are, of course, more
+remarkable where this is not the case; however, on close investigation
+those cases are more frequent where the angle of deviation is about the
+same size or smaller than the squint angle, and is fixed with a part of
+the retina which undoubtedly belongs to the common visual field.
+
+On p. 91 I have described two cases of excentric fixation in children
+who had never squinted, and it is only necessary to take a little
+trouble to repeat the mirror test which I described, to be convinced
+that squinting eyes have not lost the power "of using those parts of the
+retina," even if they are amblyopic to an extreme degree; without the
+slightest doubt the reflection is perceived as soon as it falls on the
+retina.
+
+Value is attached to the improvement produced by the separate use of the
+squinting eye. According to my experience no higher visual acuity can be
+attained by use of the amblyopic eye, than that which is best detected
+by the aid of eserine in the first examination, if it is only carried
+out thoroughly enough. No doubt if we proceed otherwise, and rest
+content with whatever statements the patient likes to make, without
+giving ourselves any more trouble, we may expect the most superficial
+diagnoses to show the most astonishing therapeutic results, as, indeed,
+often happens. And now, talking of strychnine injections! When two
+celebrated ophthalmologists occupy themselves simultaneously with the
+therapeutics of strychnine, one of whom obtains the most astonishing
+results in atrophic troubles of the optic nerves, but, on the other
+hand, obtains no real improvement in "amblyopia from non-use," while the
+other can show brilliant success in the last-named form of defective
+vision, and, on the other hand, none in atrophy of the optic nerves, we
+may perhaps conclude that both are right, if even really on the negative
+side, and that the circumstances are the same in the tests of vision.
+Again, we must examine more closely some of the cases, in which
+strychnine injections showed a brilliant result. (Anyone interested in
+the original work can read up the 'Vienna Weekly Medical News' for the
+year 1873.)
+
+"1. Wilhelm H--, a strong healthy boy, æt. 12, complains of defective
+vision. Right eye has nothing abnormal in its outward appearance, and
+just as little in the fundus. V. 16/100, H. 2·5 D., Snellen IV-I/II; is
+the smallest type he reads at 3 to 7 inches. With + 10, I-I/II is read
+at 4 to 6 inches. Left eye V. 16/70. H. 2·75 D. II-I smallest type
+legible at 3 to 12 inches. With + 4 D. I-I/II is read at 4 to 6 inches.
+On March 14th, 1872, first injection of strychnine with 0·002 gr. in the
+temples. An hour later V. of right eye 16/70, left unchanged. On March
+23rd, 1872, after one injection daily, V. of each eye is 16/50."
+
+Patient shows then in the right eye visual acuity 16/100, with manifest
+hypermetropia 2·5 D.; in all probability the total hypermetropia really
+present was higher, and was scarcely corrected by means of convex 4 D.
+If the patient now reads No. I-I/II Snellen with + 4 D. at 6 inches,
+this proves a visual acuity of 1/3 during the first investigation before
+the strychnine injection, and shows that the estimate of 16/100 was
+inaccurate. At the close of the treatment, only a visual acuity of 16/50
+(almost exactly 1/3) is specified for distance. The result seems to me,
+then, to be this, that the patient during repeated examinations has
+gradually learned to make more accurate statements, indeed, with a boy
+twelve years old one can scarcely expect it to be otherwise.
+
+"4. Paul A--, æt. 18, was operated on ten years ago for internal squint
+of the right eye, and dismissed with + 2 D. for distance, and + 6·6 D.
+for near use. He now complains of decrease of his visual acuity. The
+eyes are normal externally and internally. Hyperopic formation in a high
+degree. Right eye V. 1/20, with and without convex glasses, without
+glass only VIII-I/II with difficulty, with + 6 V-I/II the smallest. Left
+eye appears emmetropic, but is decidedly hyperopic. V. 5/4. Glasses are
+rejected; I-I/II is read fluently at 6 to 12 inches. After one injection
+the right eye recognises III-I/II with + 6, after the second II-I/II,
+after the eighteenth I-I/II with difficulty. The visual acuity, however,
+remains at 1/20, and is not changed after six months, although latterly
+patient daily practised with + 3 D."
+
+Visual acuity of 1/20 suffices to read III-I/II at 2·5 inches, II-I/II
+at 1·5 inches, and I-I/II at about 1 inch; clear, retinal images are
+then scarcely obtainable, but we know what hypermetropes can do in that
+case; besides this, if the patient is examined for weeks by Snellen's
+method, he may get so far as to realise fairly well "the strange fate of
+that man" of I-I/II, despite larger diffusion circles; in any case
+vision remained at 1/20, despite strychnine and separate use.
+
+In extremely defective vision little importance should be paid to the
+fact of slight diversity in the statements, as where visual acuity
+amounts only to about 1/36, or where fingers are counted at a distance
+of 1 to 2 metres, it is quite immaterial, as far as the usefulness of
+the eyes is concerned, whether fingers are counted at a half or a whole
+metre, and we ought never to forget that all conclusions which we draw
+from the state of the visual acuity, are unreliable in proportion as the
+latter is lowered. Indeed, on repeated examination of such cases we
+frequently find considerable fluctuation in the statements of the
+patients, therefore we ought not to expect accurate statements for very
+inexact sensual impressions.
+
+By separate use, even in extremely defective vision, no improvement in
+visual acuteness is developed, but only a more complete acquirement of
+the power of deducing right conclusions from imperfect sensual
+impressions. That which has been most unscientifically designated as
+"suppression of diffusion circles," depends solely on this method of
+use. As with indistinct retinal images so with facial impressions which
+are insufficient, one can never learn to recognise larger objects
+aright.
+
+We must never forget that vision is a conclusive act acquired by
+practice; whoever sees well with one eye, and is weak sighted with the
+other, acquires this end only for the sensual impressions of the better
+eye, and must first collect experience for the defective eye, before he
+can use it.
+
+Leber has recently joined those cases which are described as blindness
+through blepharospasm, to amblyopia from disuse. First, I wish to
+observe that blepharospasm is not a necessary cause; I have seen the
+same disturbance of vision follow severe double blenorrhoea, which
+destroyed one eye but left the other uninjured. These children are
+always of an age which renders any trial of vision impossible, and we
+are therefore obliged to draw conclusions as to visual power from the
+movements of the body. If children move as though they were blind, it
+need not necessarily follow that they are so in the common meaning of
+the word. The art of vision is a difficult one, the acquisition of which
+begins with the earliest days of life; we do not call every person blind
+who does not see what is before his eyes, because he does not understand
+how to see it. A child who has only imperfectly learnt the conclusive
+act of vision, and forgotten it again during a continued disuse of both
+eyes, will not know how to use perfect visual acuity, and will move like
+a blind person till he again learns to estimate the relations between
+his retinal images and the things of the material world, which happens
+in a very short time.
+
+After this digression let us turn again to amblyopia from disuse, and to
+the last trump which is played for it. "Those cases are very remarkable
+where an immediate improvement occurs after tenotomy in amblyopia of
+high degree, which according to this is certainly produced and
+maintained by the squint." As proof a case is cited by Knapp, who
+describes it in the following words:--"The improvement in visual power
+varied very much. In many cases it was indefinable, in others very
+pronounced; for example, in one case, where it was very great before the
+operation, only No. 16 Jaeger could be read at 1 inch, while after it
+No. 2 was read at 8 to 9 inches."
+
+And we are to believe wonders on the strength of this scanty
+communication! It is an every-day experience that a person who squints,
+who has just asserted his inability to read the largest type,
+immediately afterwards reads smaller and the smallest type, and it would
+at least first have to be determined that all endeavours to produce a
+better visual result before tenotomy were unsuccessful; but as the
+communication stands, the conclusion as to the effect of tenotomy is
+quite a superficial _post hoc ergo propter hoc_. Moreover, I had this
+case in view when I spoke on this matter in the first edition of my
+'Handbook:'--"The frequently repeated assertion that a considerable
+improvement of vision may occur as a direct result of tenotomy, is so
+little in accordance with all the laws of physiology, that inquiries
+must be instituted _ad hoc_, and carried out with the most perfect
+exactitude. Only trials of vision which are carefully carried out and
+repeated several times before the operation, and which have regard to
+visual acuteness for distance as well as for near objects, the latter
+indeed by the aid of convex glasses or Calabar extract, can be
+recognised as proving anything in face of such a perfectly improbable
+assertion. In the course of examinations so instituted I have not myself
+found that tenotomy exercises any direct influence on visual acuity."
+
+I would not have given so much space to this explanation had not a
+principle been in question. The occurrence of amblyopia as a result of
+non-use has been deductively constructed and is not inductively proved
+by observation. It is just an article of faith, and in science we cannot
+rely on such things; we must not depart from the inductive method.
+
+
+
+
+ON THE CURE OF SQUINT.
+
+
+Therapeutic investigations have their safest and most instructive basis
+in observation of the course of a disease as it appears without
+complications, and with no unusual symptoms; we can only arrive at a
+certain decision as to the extent of our therapeutics when we know
+exactly what will happen without skilled assistance. When squint is once
+present it is seldom complicated by fresh symptoms; on the other hand,
+spontaneous cures unquestionably take place. We must certainly not rely
+simply on the statements of patients themselves. On p. 1 we have seen
+what mistakes occur, even when it is a question of whether squint is
+present or not. How little such vague statements are worth is seen by
+the fact, that the question as to the direction of the previous squint
+very seldom finds a satisfactory answer; as a rule it is impossible to
+determine whether periodic or permanent squint has been present.
+
+If we undertake the task of converting the statements of patients as to
+previous squint into observations, in order to confirm the statements
+from the objective material, we must first prove whether the squint
+cannot by some means be still produced (by excluding the eye or by
+raising or lowering the eyes). Thus the condition of binocular vision
+offers us valuable guides. If we find that binocular fusion does not
+exist with available power of vision on both sides, but that the same
+conditions of sight appear in the eyes as we have learnt to attribute to
+squint, there is no reason for doubting the statements about a
+previously existing squint. It is otherwise in those cases of extreme
+amblyopia where normal binocular vision is never expected, or at least
+cannot be proved on account of the enormous difference between the two
+eyes.
+
+If we discover the existence of normal binocular fusion, squint may
+nevertheless have been present at a former time, for in many cases, of
+periodic squint particularly, the habit of binocular fusion is never
+quite lost.
+
+That squint can disappear of itself is unquestionable; how often this
+happens it is difficult to say. The fact that in ophthalmic practice we
+see many more squinting children than adults is best explained by
+this,--that squinting children are brought to us by their parents, while
+adults who still squint have usually given up any desire for a cosmetic
+improvement, and only come under treatment accidentally or on account of
+other ailments; lastly, a considerable number of cases are cured by
+operation. If the squint has disappeared we only discover by accident
+that it was ever present. The fact of its previous existence may usually
+be determined by other signs more positive than mere statements from
+memory; with reference, however, to the age at which the spontaneous
+cure takes place we are left to depend almost entirely on the patient's
+statement. As far as I have been able to determine, the period from the
+ninth or tenth up to the sixteenth year seems to offer the most
+favorable conditions.
+
+We rarely have an opportunity of watching the disappearance of squint,
+still I have observed two cases in which a permanent convergent squint
+disappeared after about a year. In both cases the squint had arisen in
+young people (of eight and nineteen years of age) in the course of
+irido-choroiditis which terminated in blindness, and disappeared with
+the sight. The fixing eye was emmetropic in one case, in the other the
+condition of error could not be determined owing to nebulæ of the
+cornea.
+
+We more frequently see periodic squint disappear.
+
+CASE 33.--M--, a boy æt. 10, was first examined by me in April, 1873;
+the right eye has hypermetropia 4·5 D., and almost full visual
+acuteness, the left has convergent squint, and recognises No. 6-1/2
+(Snellen) with convex 10 D.; V. = 1/18 at 1 metre. (The boy's father
+also squints with the left eye, which is amblyopic to a high degree (V.
+= 1/36), right eye has emmetropia, and full visual acuteness). The
+prescribed spectacles (convex, 4·5 D.) were used for working, but not
+continually; still three years later, in 1877, the deviation was
+considerably less and only occurred occasionally. In March, 1880,
+nothing more was seen of the squint, only slight convergence still
+recurred on excluding the left eye. Patient now wears convex 4·5 D.
+constantly.
+
+On account of the importance which the disappearance of squint possesses
+in hypermetropia I will describe a few more cases which belong here.
+
+CASE 34.--Mrs. B--, æt. 32, has on the left H. 1·5 D., V. 5/9; on the
+right H. 1·5 D., V. 5/12, binocular vision (H. =·75 D., V. = 5/6 to
+5/9). Asthenopic troubles are the cause of her present complaint. She
+says she squinted with the right eye as a child till her eighth or ninth
+year; the present position of the eyes is quite normal; ordinary type is
+read at the usual distance with normal fixation without glasses.
+Particularly keen fixation is rarely followed by squint, which may be
+produced by excluding the right eye; the latter then deviates about 5
+mm. inwards and slightly upwards; the secondary deviation of the left
+eye is rather less. Only the left visual field is seen in the
+stereoscope.
+
+CASE 35.--Mrs. W--, æt. 31, has on the right H. 3·5 D., V. 5/9, on the
+left V. = 1/16 with + 4 D., single words of No. 0·8 are read (mother and
+aunt have also congenital weak sight in this eye). Position and movement
+of the eyes are perfectly normal, exclusion of the left eye is followed
+by slight relative divergence. In answer to my question whether she had
+not previously squinted, patient replied that she did not know, it had
+always been a matter of dispute in her family; as, however, only the
+right visual field was seen in the stereoscope, we may be sure that
+squint had been present and that binocular fusion had been lost in
+consequence.
+
+CASE 36.--Mrs. G--, æt. 49, report in March, 1876: On the right H. 3 D.,
+V. 10/10, on the left H. 4 D., V. 10/40; a previously existing squint
+had disappeared of itself; the position of the eyes appears perfectly
+normal, but binocular fusion is not present; with red glass before one
+eye and a prism deviating in a vertical direction before the other,
+patient does not see double, but first with one eye and then with the
+other. The squint as well as its disappearance occurred however, at a
+time when it would have been regarded as an error to allow children to
+use convex glasses.
+
+CASE 37.--Miss H--, governess, æt. about 30, came under treatment for
+asthenopic disorders; on both sides hypermetropia 2·5 D., visual
+acuteness 5/18. She owns to have squinted as a child,--it had often been
+remarked when she was at school. The squint gradually disappeared, but
+still occurred sometimes on keen fixation. The usual position of the
+eyes appears perfectly normal, and gives no suspicion of squint;
+convergence occurs on exclusion, sometimes with downward deviation of
+the right eye. With the aid of a red glass changing fixation is easily
+produced even without prisms, but never diplopia. At first only the left
+visual field was seen with the stereoscope; then the right on exclusion
+of the left eye; never both at the same time. According to this the
+condition of binocular vision speaks entirely for the fact, that squint
+had existed long enough to prevent the development of a normal binocular
+visual act, and the squint had disappeared without the help of convex
+glasses in spite of the hypermetropia.
+
+CASE 38.--Bertha W--, æt. 18, reads with the naked eye on the right No.
+0·75 at 10 cm., on the left only 1·75 at the same distance;
+hypermetropia of 6 D. is detected with the ophthalmoscope, with + 5·5
+the visual acuteness of the right eye amounts at 1 metre to 1/9 (if the
+test-letters had contained No. 8 or 7·5, that would probably have been
+recognised also), on the left with + 5·5 D., V. = 1/12, with + 6 D. No.
+0·8 is read with difficulty. Patient admits to have squinted as a child;
+no squint is present now; binocular fusion can be detected with prisms
+and she only squints now and then on the left side to assist vision,
+with which, patient states without being questioned, diplopia is
+combined. Spectacles have not been used till now.
+
+I could cite several more such cases, but they would prove no more than
+these. At any rate the fact is settled that squint can disappear
+spontaneously, and without the aid of convex glasses even in high
+degrees of hypermetropia.
+
+Wecker's announcement that "this spontaneous cure goes hand in hand with
+the progressive decrease of the accommodation, and depends on the fact
+that the squinter, on the strength of this progressive decrease,
+renounces more and more the aid which he finds in the increased
+convergence during the act of accommodation," only proves to how great
+an extent one may be prejudiced by theories. A limitation of the
+accommodation must necessarily increase the claims which are made on it,
+and can only afford inducement for calling forth all the help possible
+to support the accommodation.
+
+The fact that squint spontaneously disappears after normal binocular
+fusion is completely and permanently lost, and in individuals who
+accommodate without the occurrence of a too strong convergence,
+notwithstanding their hypermetropia and without the help of the
+controlling influence of binocular single vision, seems to me quite
+irreconcilable with Donders' theory. Every motive for the same,
+hypermetropia, difference of refraction, monocular defective vision,
+&c., may not only be present without the occurrence of squint, they do
+not even prevent the spontaneous recurrence of a squint already cured.
+Of course I will not affirm that the causes made so prominent by Donders
+exercise no influence on the origin of squint, but will only emphasize
+the fact, that other causes exist which possess a greater influence, and
+which we can find only in the ocular muscles.
+
+We have no experience as to whether this spontaneous cure occurs in
+myopia with divergent squint. This is not to be wondered at, as
+hypermetropia is present in the great majority of cases of squint, and
+the observations as to spontaneous cure are also rare in these. But I
+can vouch for one case where a slight absolute divergent squint, with
+crossed diplopia, which I treated shortly after its origin in a youthful
+myope, with prismatic spectacles, soon disappeared, and remained
+permanently cured.
+
+The inclination to preponderance of the interni appears to be peculiar
+to youth, while later on circumstances change in favour of the externi,
+and that seems to me the chief ground for the spontaneous cure of
+convergent squint. The cure is not always complete; deviation still
+occurs on exclusion, or on particularly keen fixation; sometimes,
+however, also under conditions which can only be put down to a change in
+the elastic tensions of the muscles. The following is an interesting
+illustration of this:
+
+CASE 39.--Miss S--, æt. 20, states that she squinted frequently as a
+child from her fifth to her tenth year; the squint gradually
+disappeared, but returned again from time to time during the last half
+year without apparent cause. The examination showed normal position of
+the eyes, slight convergence only on exclusion. Visual acuteness on the
+right 5/6, with atropine ophthalmoscopic and functional emmetropia, the
+visual acuteness is lowered to 5/12 by convex 1 D.; on the left
+hypermetropia 7 D., visual acuteness 5/18; the same degree of
+hypermetropia is found with the ophthalmoscope.
+
+Crossed diplopia with a difference in height is distinguished with the
+aid of a red glass, the difference being corrected by a prism of 4°,
+with the base downwards before the right eye; a prism of 4° with the
+base inwards suffices to place the double images immediately above one
+another. Spontaneous diplopia does not take place; only the right visual
+field is seen in the stereoscope. As patient lived in Brandenburg and
+only came to consult me occasionally I never had an opportunity of
+seeing the squint till she decided to stay here for some time. It was
+then seen that a peculiar oscillating deviation of the left eye of about
+4 mm. inwards often occurred. As the previous spontaneous disappearance
+of the squint and the crossed diplopia made one fear that tenotomy of
+the internus might be followed by divergence, instillations were used in
+order to make a more exact measurement of the deviation,--by this means
+the condition was so improved in the course of a few weeks, that
+deviation no longer occurred even on exclusion of the right eye.
+
+The spontaneous cure of squint may, however, be quite complete; indeed I
+have seen one case where convergent squint became divergent.
+
+CASE 40.--A young lady, slightly over twenty years of age, showed on the
+right M. ·75 D., V = 10/10, on the left H. 1·5 D., V. 10/40 to 10/30,
+and slight divergent squint on the left side. Crossed diplopia could be
+produced with a red glass, tenotomy of the left abducens sufficed to
+correct it. I had not concealed my doubts as to her statement that she
+had previously squinted inwards, but they were quite dispelled by a
+photograph taken about twelve years before, in which decided right
+convergent squint could not be mistaken. There is something to be said
+for the fact that it may have been a periodic squint, which occurred
+during the taking of the picture, as the photographer would have taken
+pains to hide a permanent squint in some way.
+
+Conscious suppression of squint happens now and then, although very
+rarely.
+
+CASE 41.--Miss A. L--, æt. 27, is stated to have commenced to squint in
+her first year, until at the age of eighteen she took pains to cure the
+habit, and with perfect success as far as regards the position of the
+eyes; the only disagreeable symptom was that she could no longer read
+with the naked eye. Spectacles were therefore prescribed for her, convex
+5 D., but even they did not quite remove the trouble in reading; it was
+now a disagreeable, painful sensation to have recourse to squint in
+order to see more clearly. It was easiest to read with greatly lowered
+field of vision and with the help of a convex eyeglass as well as the
+spectacles. During the examination I found on the right hypermetropia
+5·5 D., visual acuteness 5/12 to 5/9, on the left with + 5·5 D., V =
+1/12. With convex 6 D. No. 0·5 was read at 12 inches from the glass, but
+not nearer, with normal fixation on both sides. The binocular near point
+(if we may employ this expression in the absence of normal binocular
+fusion) was considerably removed without the existence of paresis of the
+accommodation, despite the over-correction of the hypermetropia. It was
+rather a question of the same disposition of the relative amplitude of
+accommodation as I have previously described in a similar case. By
+methodical practice of binocular vision, I had taught an intelligent boy
+to fix binocularly, not only for distance, but also for near objects,
+but here again the relative amplitude for accommodation was diminished,
+so that with correct binocular fixation he could only read with convex
+glasses, which greatly over-corrected the hypermetropia. Finally, the
+normal amplitude of accommodation was restored by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, and when I saw the patient twelve years later I was
+able to satisfy myself that both were perfectly preserved. In the case
+of Miss L--, I believed I ought to give up all thoughts of an operation;
+the position of the eyes could not be improved, convex 5·5 D. eyeglass
+perfectly sufficed for distance, and convex 7 D. spectacles for reading.
+It seemed to me senseless to perform tenotomy merely to enable her to
+use the same glass for distance and for near objects, without any
+possibility of a cosmetic improvement. Moreover the condition of
+binocular vision quite confirmed the statements as to the previous
+squint. Diplopia could only be produced now and then with the help of
+prisms and red glass, at first the right visual field only was seen in
+the stereoscope, on closer observation also the left, but without
+binocular fusion.
+
+Besides, the proved decrease of the relative power of accommodation in
+both these cases, marked by a voluntary suppression of the squint, does
+not appear in those cases where squint disappears of itself, the state
+of the accommodation, therefore, shows nothing unusual.
+
+The spontaneous cure of squint teaches us two important facts, firstly,
+that the conditions of tension of the ocular muscles may change in the
+course of time, and secondly, that normal binocular fusion of the
+retinal images is not necessary for a correct position of the eyes;
+neither the spontaneous nor the operative cure of squint presupposes the
+presence or the restoration of a normal binocular fusion. If this were
+the case the operation for squint would not be of much use.
+
+Observation of these cases further teaches, that treatment with convex
+glasses has prospects of success, particularly in periodic squint with
+hypermetropia, if squint can disappear spontaneously even without
+correction of the hypermetropia. At the same time, however, it appears
+that we need not form hasty conclusions about it. Periodic squint
+frequently arises during the earliest years of life, and everyone
+(perhaps with the exception of a few ophthalmologists) will at once
+reject the idea of allowing children of two to three years old to wear
+spectacles; constant wearing of spectacles even by older children seems
+to me not to be without risk as long as there is any chance of their
+falling when running, playing, &c., in which case the eyes as well as
+the spectacles would be in danger. As a rule I only order children to
+wear convex spectacles when they are distinctly indicated, and then only
+during sedentary occupations, when working and eating. Of course,
+exceptions may be made according to the individuality of the child, and
+the care with which it is looked after at home.
+
+We are more rarely able to remove permanent convergent squint by means
+of convex glasses than the periodic form; that it is possible, however,
+I should like to show by an account of a patient, who offers, besides,
+other interesting peculiarities.
+
+CASE 42.--Marie S--, æt. 6, came under treatment on November 28th, 1878,
+for recent superficial marginal keratitis of the left eye, which was
+treated first with atropine; a few days later slight blepharitis
+appeared also. On December 9th, atropine was discontinued; on the 14th,
+the position of the eyes was still quite normal; on the 19th, permanent
+convergent squint of the left eye was present. Squint had never been
+observed in the child before. Double images were voluntarily announced
+without my having inquired for them, they were homonymous and moved
+further apart at both sides of the visual field. On December 28th, the
+squint still remained the same, the double images were, however,
+scarcely noticed by the child, so quickly do the relations of the
+corresponding points of the retina change even in the sixth year. Both
+eyes were atropinised for the better determination of the error, when a
+slight degree of hypermetropia was shown by the ophthalmoscope, at most
+1·5 D.; certainly a higher degree was specified when the vision was
+tested, namely, on the right H. 2·5 D., V. = 5/12 to 5/9, on the left H.
+1·75 D., V. = 5/18, probably, however, the objective determination was
+more exact than the child's statements. If a child of six knows its
+letters and figures sufficiently well to undergo a visual test, that is
+as much as we can expect; in any case, however, the forms of the
+letters and figures which we use for the visual test are not easy to
+children, and the more objective the way in which the child comprehends
+the examination, the less it perplexes itself by guesses, but only names
+the letters which it really distinctly recognises, the less deficient
+are the reports as to the visual acuteness; the proportionately larger
+retinal images are still recognised, even if they are no longer quite
+distinct, but consist of diffusion circles as a result of
+over-correction of the hypermetropia. That these observations were right
+for the case in point, is seen by the fact that eight days later, after
+the effects of the atropine had passed off, the child could see better
+with the naked eyes than with convex glasses, and that finally, when it
+had become accustomed to the forms of the letters and figures employed,
+V. = 5/9 was announced on the right, and V. = 5/12 on the left.
+
+Mydriasis by atropine had no influence whatever on the squint,
+therefore, on December 31st, convex spectacles 2 D. were prescribed for
+permanent use. On January 4th, the linear deviation still amounted to 4
+mm.; on January 15th, convergence was no longer discernible for
+distance, with red glass double images occurred at once; on January
+21st, no squint was present, and binocular fusion was again restored;
+prisms immediately caused double images, the facultative divergence was
+= 0. I thought it prudent to order the spectacles to be worn till the
+middle of March, when they were discontinued; squint has not appeared
+since then.
+
+In this case it is impossible to determine what really induced the
+squint, certainly not the slight hypermetropia, for the child had
+already learnt to read without squinting, and was spared any exertion at
+the time when the squint arose. Neither can we look for the cause in the
+inflammatory condition for which the child first came under treatment,
+this was as good as removed before the squint began and no exciting
+condition worth naming was present. Moreover, most cases of squint
+arise without directly assignable causes. It seems to me unquestionable
+that the permanent use of convex glasses made the pathological relation
+between accommodation and convergence normal, before it had firmly
+established itself, and before the muscular relations were definitely
+changed, and that the squint was really thus cured. But if the child had
+not been under treatment I should scarcely have seen the squint so soon
+after its first occurrence, and most cases of squint arise at an age
+which forbids the permanent wearing of spectacles.
+
+If permanent squint has already existed for a long time, nothing can be
+hoped for from the use of convex glasses; for the conditions of the
+muscles are then so much changed, that they are no longer influenced by
+such weak physiological powers. I have been able to convince myself in
+the case of several squinting persons, who conscientiously wore the
+spectacles prescribed for them elsewhere, that the squint was concealed
+by this means; that may suffice in some cases, but if it is a question
+of young girls we may well ask, which is to be preferred for appearance
+sake, squint or spectacles.
+
+Tenotomy effects essentially a cosmetic improvement--its object is to
+restore the correct position of the eyes by equalising the elastic
+muscular tensions. The means at our disposal are, the simple separation
+of the tendon of the too-tense muscle from the sclerotic, the
+distribution of the operation between both eyes, and finally, increasing
+the strength of the antagonist by moving forwards its insertion.
+
+The method of tenotomy as I carry it out is as follows: The conjunctiva
+is seized with fine forceps exactly over the insertion of the muscle to
+be divided, and the fold thus raised cut into with the smallest possible
+wound. Provided we operate on the right spot we enter this opening with
+the forceps and immediately seize the tendon close to its insertion on
+the sclerotic, which is drawn forwards, as was the conjunctiva, and
+loosened with flat, curved scissors, the points of which must be rounded
+off. The incision must only be large enough to allow a small hook with a
+knob to be inserted through it and behind the insertion of the tendon,
+which is now lifted up and divided with fine pointed scissors close to
+its insertion into the sclerotic. It is important to make sure that a
+few threads coming off from the tendon at the ends of the insertion do
+not remain uncut; we can only consider the operation to be complete when
+the hook, carried behind the edge of the insertion made clearly visible
+by the foregoing proceeding, slides up to the margin of the cornea
+without any interruption.
+
+The method of performing advancement is as follows: An incision is made
+in the conjunctiva over the tendon of the muscle to be brought forward
+and just at the outer bend of the latter, then loosened together with
+the subconjunctival tissue to the corneal margin; it is desirable to
+carry out this loosening close to the sclerotic, as the flap of the
+conjunctiva thus formed must afford sufficient support to the muscle to
+be brought forward. Then the capsule of Tenon is cut into at one edge of
+the insertion, a flat, curved, blunt hook without a knob is carried
+between muscle and sclerotic, and out again at the other edge of the
+insertion. We must be careful to get the muscle as clean as possible on
+the hook in the whole width of its insertion, that is without the
+capsule of Tenon, for the suture put in ought only to enclose the
+muscle, without at the same time dragging the capsule of Tenon. For the
+suture I always use fine catgut which is provided at both ends with
+curved needles; needles of slightly different form may be chosen in
+order that the threads may be easily distinguished from one another. A
+needle is carried behind the hook from each thread, one through the
+upper, the other through the lower edge of the muscle, between it and
+the sclerotic, then the thread is tied in a knot on the muscle to make
+sure that it does not slip back through the loop of the thread after
+its separation from the sclerotic. Then the threads are knotted on the
+muscle, and the insertion is separated from the sclerotic. As the edge
+of the insertion is now exposed we can see how the land lies, and can
+carry the threads exactly in the direction of the muscle under the
+conjunctiva to the corneal margin, where they are passed through, and
+ends tied in a knot. By this means the muscle is drawn forwards
+precisely in its normal direction and stretched tighter. The wound in
+the conjunctiva is closed by a suture.
+
+It is desirable to slightly stretch the muscle that is to be brought
+forward in both the above operations while the eye is rolled towards the
+opposite side with forceps. Further, as I always operate under
+chloroform, I dispense with the usual test of the immediate effect of
+the operation; such tests have no value before the effects of the
+narcotic have completely disappeared, and one must be sure in the way
+above described that no single fibres are left undivided. I lay special
+stress on the fact that the operation is so performed, that it is able
+to bring about the desired mechanical effect.
+
+The immediate mechanical effects of simple tenotomy may be easily
+deduced; the divided muscle retracts as far as its elasticity and its
+relations with the surrounding tissues permit. With reference to the
+internal and external rectus with which strabotomy specially has to do,
+those relations come principally under observation which the front part
+of the muscle enters into with the conjunctival tissues; the greater the
+extent to which we loosen these relations, the farther the muscle can
+retract. If it is a question of obtaining a greater effect, I am
+accustomed to loosen the subconjunctival tissue at the front part of the
+muscle behind the lachrymal caruncle to a greater extent--this offers
+the additional advantage that the distorting sinking in of the caruncle
+is avoided.
+
+By dividing one rectus its antagonist gains in proportion and rolls the
+eye towards it as far as its own elastic tension and the powers still
+present on the other side permit. The improvement in position which we
+strive to obtain is brought about by the elastic power of the
+antagonist, and not by the tenotomy itself, and it is seen by this then,
+that the term strabotomy simply, does not quite express the
+circumstances of the case. Tenotomy is nothing more than the means for
+procuring a preponderance of the elastic power of the antagonist,
+therefore the effect attainable on the position of the eye does not
+depend solely on the division of the muscle, but to a great extent on
+the elasticity of the antagonist, and may be nullified at once, if the
+antagonist does not perform what we expect from it, and that may happen
+without our being able to foresee it. For example:
+
+CASE 43.--Julie B--, æt. 21, is stated to have squinted inwards since
+her third year, principally with the right eye, but with occasional
+alternation. The deviation amounts to 5 mm., the outward movement of
+both eyes is perfectly normal. Hypermetropia 2 D., visual acuteness 5/18
+on both sides. Ophthalmoscopically with atropine the same degree of
+hypermetropia. Tenotomy of both interni on March 7th, 1879. On March
+14th, deviation 5 mm., just as before. Then renewed division of the
+internal rectus and shortening of the external rectus of the right eye;
+but still the result was insufficient. Therefore, on March 21st, the
+left eye was dealt with in the same way. By this means a normal position
+of the eye was obtained, which was perfectly preserved when I saw the
+patient again a year and a half later. Everything led me to suppose
+beforehand that simple tenotomy of both internal recti would perfectly
+suffice to remove the squint, yet it was of no use, but had to be
+supplemented by shortening both external recti. In such cases I would
+not advise repeated tenotomies, but for the correction of the
+insufficient result as soon as possible by advancement of the
+antagonist.
+
+Advancement very frequently gives us an opportunity of seeing with our
+own eyes the insufficiency of the antagonist and its faulty anatomical
+development. We may suppose this to be the case if the mobility towards
+the side of the antagonist is faulty, however that is no proof;
+considerable insufficiency may co-exist with perfectly normal mobility.
+If limitation of movement is present, to which insufficiency of the
+antagonist may be assigned as the cause, or if it is desirable to obtain
+the greatest possible result by means of an operation on the squinting
+eye, we must combine tenotomy of the deviating muscle with advancement
+of the antagonist. The same is stretched tighter, and rolls the eye more
+strongly to its side, and we can regulate the degree of shortening of
+the muscle, by the distance behind the insertion at which we place the
+threads in the muscle, also by the distance from the corneal margin at
+which we place our anterior sutures, although the rapidly increasing
+ductility of the conjunctiva makes it desirable that we should not go
+far from the corneal margin.
+
+The exact rules for the application of the methods of operation differ
+according to the nature of the case under consideration. If we
+contemplate first the largest group, that of the ordinary permanent
+convergent squint, the choice of the method is principally determined by
+the average degree of deviation, the condition of error, and the visual
+power, lastly by the mobility, particularly the outward movement of the
+eyes. If the visual power of both eyes is nearly the same, or if the
+squinting eye possesses such a visual acuteness that it can be used in
+fixation, it is advisable as a rule to arrange the relations of the
+muscles as equally as possible in both eyes--simple division of the
+internal recti is therefore, as a rule, to be performed in both eyes.
+If, on the other hand, the vision of the squinting eye is in a high
+degree defective, so that only the better one is used, it is generally
+advisable to confine the operation as far as possible to the squinting
+eye; in that case, tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement of
+the external rectus is usually indicated in the squinting eye, and
+frequently suffices.
+
+Deviations which are so slight, that the careful division of both
+interni without loosening the conjunctiva at the front part of the
+muscle makes us fear an excessive result, are seldom the subject of
+operative treatment; if the deviation is slight but still a
+disfigurement, if it amounts to 3 to 4 mm., distribution between both
+eyes is suitable, because, when the squinting eye possesses requisite
+visual acuteness it is put into fixation more frequently after the
+operation than before. Under these circumstances, if the operation is
+confined to the squinting eye, and a sufficient result is thereby
+obtained, as soon as this eye is used for fixation a remarkable
+secondary deviation of the other eye occurs, which is not the case if
+the tensions of the muscles have been balanced by an operation on both
+sides.
+
+A deviation of 5 to 6 mm. may usually be balanced by means of simple
+double tenotomy if the conjunctiva is considerably loosened behind the
+caruncle; not unfrequently, however, we must be careful to strengthen
+the result by means of the after-treatment. Commonly, during the first
+twenty-four hours, the result appears to be quite satisfactory, whilst
+on the second or third day troublesome convergence again sets in. By
+practice of the outward movement we then usually obtain at once a
+perceptible improvement of the position. Both eyes are repeatedly turned
+as far as possible to the right and left, by which means is obtained on
+the one hand, exercise of the external recti, on the other, increase of
+the effect of the tenotomy of the internal recti. I order these
+exercises to be begun on the day after the operation.
+
+Besides this, however, in the relation between accommodation and
+convergence of the visual axes there is a very essential cause which is
+able to lessen the immediate effect of the operation. Persons who squint
+inwards, even if emmetropic, have the habit of combining accommodation
+for near objects with excessive convergence of the visual axes, thus
+the immediate effect of the operation is diminished as soon as they
+begin to use their eyes again. This happens, not by a lessening of the
+effect of the tenotomy, which could, indeed, only be increased by
+exertion of the internal recti, but in that sufficient time is not given
+for the external rectus to regain its normal elastic tension. Nothing is
+changed at first by the operation in the customary relation between
+accommodation and innervation of the internal recti--it is a question,
+then, of avoiding every exertion of the accommodation for some time, in
+order that no inducement for strong convergence should be given. I am
+accustomed, therefore, even in the case of emmetropes, to paralyse the
+accommodation by means of atropine twenty-four hours after the
+operation, and to remove the far-point by convex glasses to about 0·70
+m.; the spectacles must, of course, be worn constantly, for only by that
+means can we be sure that they are always used for near objects. After a
+few weeks the spectacles are discontinued, first for distance, then for
+near objects also. This after-treatment is not necessary under all
+circumstances; but I have repeatedly assured myself that an originally
+sufficient result which perceptibly diminished after a few days, could
+by this means be restored and permanently maintained even in emmetropes.
+
+In the case of hypermetropes, we more often meet with the same
+experience; in permanent convergent squint it is by no means necessary
+to neutralise the hypermetropia permanently after the operation, but it
+happens here more often than in emmetropia, that a perfectly good
+immediate effect is lost within the first week after the operation, and
+can be restored again by permanently wearing the correcting convex
+glasses. In such cases also, I am accustomed after a few months to
+discontinue the spectacles for distance as an experiment, while they are
+still used for working.
+
+Simple tenotomy of both internal recti does not, as a rule, suffice for
+deviations of more than 7 mm.; therefore, even if both eyes possess good
+visual power, we must still decide on tenotomy of both internal recti
+together with advancement of the external rectus of the squinting eye,
+or anticipate repeated tenotomies of the internal recti, or seek to
+obtain the greatest possible effect by means of slight modification of
+the method of procedure.
+
+Provided that the muscle was completely divided, and sufficiently
+loosened from the conjunctiva during the first operation, a repetition
+of the tenotomy can only aim at an increase of the effect if the elastic
+tension of the antagonist has improved in the meantime. I very rarely
+therefore carry out repeated tenotomies; it seems to me much more
+desirable to obtain a sufficient result at one operation whenever that
+is possible.
+
+In some cases where there is a deviation of 7 to 9 mm., the effect of
+the tenotomy may be increased by inducing a strong divergence
+immediately after the tenotomy of the internal recti, which is
+maintained for 6 to 8 hours. For this a thread is passed through the
+conjunctiva at the outer edge of the cornea about 4 mm. above the
+horizontal meridian, and out again about 2 mm. below the horizontal
+meridian, then from below upwards in the same way, so that the
+conjunctiva is contained in a loop. The needle is then passed through
+the external canthus from the conjunctival surface and fastened by tying
+it over a roll of paper. This procedure is only to be recommended in
+exceptional cases; a greater effect on the internal recti is thus
+obtained, while with reference to the position the result depends on the
+elastic tension of the external rectus just as in simple tenotomy.
+
+If the squinting eye has only an unavailable visual acuteness, a
+combination of tenotomy of the internal rectus with shortening of the
+external rectus is the best procedure. As a rule, simple tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the squinting eye is of very little use in such
+cases, as the abducens, weakened by continual extension and wanting
+practice, places too slight an opposing power in the balance. The chief
+effect of the operation then devolves on the other solely available eye,
+which is not a desirable circumstance, and is also frequently
+insufficient. On the other hand, the combination of tenotomy of the
+internal rectus with advancement of the external rectus enables us
+successfully to change the opposing muscular tensions. As a rule, the
+operation may be confined to the squinting, weak-sighted eye, as that
+suffices to obtain a correction of 5 to 6 mm.
+
+If the result is seen to be insufficient, it may be supplemented by
+tenotomy of the internal rectus of the other eye; in the case of
+deviations of more than 7 mm. it is advisable to divide the operation
+between the eyes in this way.
+
+The suture has a special use in so-called artificial strabismus; that
+is, in those cases where convergent is converted into divergent squint
+through unskilful treatment, or where tenotomy of the abducens,
+performed on account of "insufficiency of the internal recti," is
+followed by convergent strabismus. I have not found confirmation of the
+fear expressed by Arlt, that the method proposed by me could be scarcely
+practicable if it is a case of the advancement of a muscle too far
+forward, and I have corrected a large number of such cases in other
+practices. It is seldom profitable to take up things in which others
+have been unsuccessful, but it bring its own reward in the case of
+artificial squint.
+
+Periodic convergent squint offers a less certain ground for the
+operation. The change between normal position and a very considerable
+squint gives rise to the fear that an operation which would be able to
+remove the convergence might finally induce divergent strabismus. This
+fear is certainly not groundless, but at the same time it must be
+remembered that, with the exception perhaps of a few cases of clearly
+accommodative deviation, elastic preponderance of the internal recti or
+insufficiency of the external recti is generally the cause of periodic
+squint also. I have frequently, in periodic squint, performed double
+tenotomy of the internal recti with the slightest possible loosening of
+the conjunctiva. I have also attempted to confine the operation to the
+shortening of the external rectus without loosening the internal recti
+and with success, but not frequently enough to be able to deliver a
+certain opinion upon it.
+
+In periodic squint, the first care must always be to determine the
+condition of refraction, if possible with atropine, and to neutralise or
+over-correct hypermetropia if present. If squint is absent during the
+use of convex glasses, which happens frequently under these
+circumstances, the operation offers no further advantages, as the
+constant use of convex glasses afterwards can hardly be avoided. If the
+periodic deviation continues to exist, the operation can be carried out
+according to the above rules and so as to cause a slight effect.
+
+The final result is usually attained after two to three weeks in
+convergent squint; it is better to allow a slight degree of convergence
+to exist, as divergence, however slight, existing at this time, brings
+with it the fear of a gradual increase. It happens occasionally, that
+after years, convergence asserts itself again; I have observed it in
+spontaneous (see Case 39) as well as in operative cure of squint; still,
+this is so unusual, that I should like to give an illustration of the
+latter observation on account of its rarity.
+
+CASE 44.--Hedw. von L--, æt 10, came under treatment in April, 1874, for
+convergent squint on the left side which arose in her seventh year, with
+occasional alternation. Emmetropia, determined with atropine on both
+sides and good visual acuteness. Diplopia was present at the
+commencement of the squint. Patient can only be rendered conscious of
+double images by the help of a red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms. Double tenotomy of the internal recti effected a normal
+position, and at the end of December, 1874, the continuance of the same
+could be proved as well as binocular fusion with prisms. At the
+beginning of 1880, I was informed that from time to time periodic squint
+had occurred with diplopia. In the middle of March, I had an opportunity
+of seeing the young lady. Myopia 2 D. had meanwhile developed on both
+sides, visual acuteness almost = 1. The position of the eyes was
+perfectly good, slight convergence occurred during covering, homonymous
+double images with a red glass which, at a distance of 5 m., were joined
+by a prism of 8°; stereoscopic fusion was not perfectly certain. A true
+squint could not be proved. On April 3rd, as patient stopped for a few
+hours on her journey through, a striking convergent squint of the left
+eye was seen. The deviation amounted to 4 to 5 mm. Single vision existed
+at a distance of 15 to 20 cm., then homonymous double images appeared,
+which did not correspond to the objective deviation; the double images
+were however corrected by a prism of 6° (base outwards) for an object 5
+m. distant.
+
+We cannot conclude the consideration of the operative treatment of
+convergent squint without once more returning to the relation between
+the line of vision and the position of the cornea. The angle [Greek: a]
+still deserves mention in a few thankful words--_hic mihi angulus
+praeter omnes ridet_--it is a very useful guide in tenotomy. In tenotomy
+we may count as gain the apparent divergence which it causes in
+hypermetropes who do not squint. We obtain a perfect cosmetic result,
+while a convergence, objectively determinable, but not otherwise easily
+visible, continues to exist. It would be folly to exceed this; and for
+cases where binocular fusion does not exist, and where diplopia is not
+present, to wish to remove this covered convergence due to the angle
+[Greek: a], the cosmetic result would be impaired by it.
+
+Those cases where it is a question of uniting homonymous double images
+are very instructive when considering tenotomy. Only when squint arises
+after childhood (after the fifteenth year) does it cause troublesome
+diplopia, this accords naturally with the laws of normal binocular
+fusion learnt meanwhile. (On the other hand those cases, which sometimes
+occur after tenotomy, with the double images in a position which does
+not correspond to the normal physiological laws and which cannot
+therefore be united by prisms, are naturally unsuitable for the
+operative removal of diplopia.) Cases in which convergent squint is
+followed by troublesome double images, appear, with the exception of the
+hysterical form mentioned on p. 41, chiefly in myopia, more seldom in
+emmetropia, and very rarely in hypermetropia; for if the conditions
+contained in the ocular muscles are coincident with hypermetropia,
+squint usually arises in the course of childhood, before normal
+binocular vision has become a fixed habit.
+
+As the cases here under consideration are not very common, I will relate
+a few from which conclusions may be derived as to the effect of
+tenotomy.
+
+CASE 45.--Miss von B--, æt. 14, came under treatment on May 1st, 1875,
+for diplopia, which made its appearance about a year previously.
+Emmetropia and full visual acuteness exist on both sides. The double
+images are homonymous and further apart on both sides of the visual
+field. At first single vision existed only to about 0·75 m.; gradually,
+however, the area of single vision was extended by practice of the
+outward movement, supported by the use of prismatic spectacles, so that
+after a year patient could see singly to a great distance. This
+improvement was not maintained. At the beginning of 1879, diplopia was
+again present to a troublesome degree, particularly on looking
+downwards; on looking straight forwards the left eye showed a slight
+convergent deviation, amounting at most to 2 mm. During various
+examinations the distance of the double images was stated to be now
+less, now greater, a prism of at least 5°, at most of 9°, was requisite
+for correction. Diplopia was at once removed by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, with very slight loosening of the conjunctiva, and has
+not appeared since.
+
+CASE 46.--Miss A--, æt. 17, suffered from diplopia for a few weeks, a
+year and a half ago; for the last half year the diplopia is continuous,
+and striking squint is stated to be sometimes present. Myopia 2 D. on
+both sides, visual acuteness = 5/9. On fixation of an object about 4 m.
+distant, the left eye deviates inwards at most 2 mm.; homonymous double
+images, with a red glass and on correction of the myopia, which were
+united by means of prism 14° at a distance of 5 m., without red glass
+(with retinal images alike on both sides) prism 8° sufficed to unite
+them. If a vertically deviating prism is held before one eye, the double
+images stand just above one another when looking at an object 20 cm.
+off, on nearer approach they are crossed. On May 3rd, 1879, tenotomy of
+the left internal rectus with small conjunctival wound without loosening
+of the conjunctiva, and union of the conjunctival wound by a suture. On
+May 8th, single vision, also with correction of the myopia and with red
+glass. Facultative divergence = 2°. On May 14th, with correction of the
+myopia, there was still single vision for distance; however, with red
+glass double images occurred again; and at the end of May the condition
+of the double images was just the same as before the operation. On
+vertical shifting of one visual field by a weak prism the double images
+are brought into a vertical line by means of prism 16°, with the base
+outwards. Therefore, on July 1st, the right internal rectus was also
+divided, with small conjunctival wound without loosening of the
+conjunctiva and without suture. The evening after the operation slight
+divergence on covering. On July 24th, binocular single vision is
+present; with red glass homonymous double images at 5 m., corrected by
+prism 4°. This time the result was final; for in the middle of October,
+three months after the operation, the report was exactly like the one of
+July 24th above stated.
+
+CASE 47.--Mrs. A--, æt. 33, has suffered for six months from alternating
+convergent squint with diplopia, for a short time even a parallel
+position is still possible. On the right myopia 4 D., V. = 6/12. On the
+left myopia 4 D., V. 6/9. Single vision occurs to 22 cm., at a greater
+distance homonymous double images, whose mutual distance remains the
+same when looking to one side. On correction of the myopia a prism of at
+least 32° is necessary for the union of the double images for an object
+at 4 m. Two days after tenotomy of the internal recti on both sides, the
+facultative divergence amounted to 7° (at 4 m.) on correction of the
+myopia. Single vision was also present when looking strongly to one
+side, and with differentiation of one retinal image by a red glass.
+
+CASE 48.--Mr. B--, æt. 32, first observed the occurrence of diplopia at
+the beginning of April, 1877. Myopia 6 D. is present in both eyes,
+visual acuteness on the right 1/2, on the left rather more than 1/2
+(5/9). The double images are homonymous and sometimes (not always) move
+farther apart at the limits of the visual field. Patient could only
+decide after two years, in July, 1879, on the operative treatment then
+proposed. Diplopia continued to exist; single vision was only now and
+then possible for a short time. On correction of the myopia (if one eye
+is provided with a red glass) prism 12° suffices for union of the double
+images. If one visual field is moved in a vertical direction by a prism
+of 5° during the trial of convergence, prism 38° is necessary in order
+to equalize the lateral deviation of the double images, and to place
+them perpendicularly above one another for an object 5 m. distant. On
+July 14th, tenotomy of the internal rectus of the left eye; single
+vision next day on correction of the myopia, prism 6° is overcome by
+divergence; if, however, double images are produced by a vertically
+deviating prism of 5° they immediately show homonymous lateral
+deviation, which is corrected by prism 18° at a distance of 5 m.
+
+Two months after the operation the diplopia was certainly better, but by
+no means removed; squint occurred periodically as before, so that
+sometimes single vision was possible at 3 to 4 m., sometimes troublesome
+diplopia was present.
+
+During the test of convergence with prisms deviating in a vertical
+direction, a prism of 38° was necessary for the equalization of the
+lateral deviation just as before the operation. Therefore in the middle
+of October the internal rectus of the right eye was divided, and the
+conjunctiva loosened as far as the caruncle. Three days afterwards
+single vision, facultative divergence = prism 5°; in the trial of
+convergence, equalization by means of prism 8°. In the middle of
+October, two months after the operation, diplopia had not appeared
+again; facultative divergence = 0; homonymous double images are produced
+by a red glass before one eye, slight convergent deviation on covering
+it, which in the trial of convergence is equalized by prism 20°. The
+preponderance of the interni was now so far lessened for the ordinary
+use of the eyes, that permanent binocular single vision was possible.
+
+Notwithstanding the small number of these cases we may conclude from
+them, that homonymous diplopia in typical convergent squint (not
+paralytic) can only be corrected occasionally by one-sided tenotomy when
+the deviation is slight. As a rule it is necessary to distribute the
+operation between the eyes. A result seems attainable by means of simple
+tenotomy on both sides, which is expressed by prism 20° in the trial of
+convergence. In future cases it would be desirable to determine during
+correction of the anomalies of refraction (1) the weakest prism which is
+able to unite the double images at about 5 m. distant (without red
+glass); (2) the distance at which the double images stand apart from one
+another during the trial of convergence with prisms deviating in a
+vertical direction; and (3) the prism which brings the double images
+immediately above one another in the case of objects about 5 m. off.
+
+Next to the cases above discussed stand those where convergent squint
+remains after paralysis of the abducens; at the same time slightly
+defective mobility and a distinct moving apart of the double images
+towards the affected side can usually be detected. In a few such cases I
+could restrict myself to tenotomy of the internal rectus of the affected
+eye, but in those cases which I was able to attend to more particularly,
+double tenotomy was necessary, and did not always suffice. Here also the
+advancement of the external rectus is suitably applied, which I should
+like to illustrate by means of a few examples.
+
+CASE 49.--Mr. B--, æt. 20, was seized by paralysis of the abducens of
+the right eye in November, 1877. In April, 1878, convergent squint was
+still present, and as it continued patient decided on an operation in
+February, 1879. Both eyes are emmetropic and possess full visual
+acuteness.
+
+Immediately before the operation the double images were united at 4 to 5
+m. in the horizontal plane by a prism of 39°; towards the right their
+deviation rather increased. The measurable deviation amounted to 4 mm.
+in the right eye, the secondary deviation of the left to 5 mm. In order
+to proceed carefully, I confined myself at first to tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the right eye. After the space of a week single
+vision was present at the distance of 1 metre in the middle line and at
+the height of the eyes; at about 5 m. homonymous double images corrected
+by prism 12°, together with slight difference in height (= prism 4°,
+base upwards before the right eye). The area of double vision extended
+from the limit of the right visual field to about 20° the other side of
+the middle line.
+
+This result would have sufficed perfectly for a cosmetic tenotomy where
+binocular fusion did not exist; the annoyance caused to patient by
+diplopia, however, was only slightly relieved. I decided, therefore, on
+a second operation, not without fearing an excessive result, and
+performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus with a very small
+conjunctival wound and by closing the wound by means of a suture. The
+result was by no means excessive, for it was perfectly _nil_, apparently
+even negative at first, for a few days after the operation the area of
+single vision approached the eye to less than 0·5 m. and at 4 to 5 m. a
+prism of 20° was requisite for correction; however, eighteen days after
+the tenotomy of the left internus everything was as before. Single
+vision to 1 m. while prism 12° corrected for a distance of 4 to 5 m. The
+tenotomy then had no effect at all on the position of the eye; however,
+the restriction of movement dependent on it, asserted itself in that the
+double images were crossed on the limit of the right visual field (about
+45° towards the right). On the supposition that this insufficient result
+might be caused by the suture of the conjunctival wound I decided to
+repeat the separation of the internal rectus. The agglutination of the
+muscle with the sclerotic is so slight for two to three weeks after the
+operation that the strabismus hook perfectly suffices to sever the
+connection; no suture was put in, but the result again was _nil_, and on
+the day after the operation single vision was only present to 0·5 m. in
+the middle line, just as after the previous tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus. It was now clear that the result with respect to the
+position of the eye was only unsuccessful because the antagonist did not
+do its duty. I shortened the abducens (without touching the internus
+again). The immediate effect, during the chloroform narcosis, was a
+terrible divergence, but on the same evening it was less, and
+twenty-four hours after the operation with a red glass, homonymous
+double images were present close together at a distance of 4 m. Ten days
+afterwards binocular single vision was insured, facultative divergence
+= 3° at 4 m., crossed double images towards the limits of both visual
+fields, but only on moving the eyes in a lateral direction; no practical
+use was made of this. If one could have diagnosed beforehand the
+insufficiency of the externi assuredly present here, which was probably
+the reason for the development of squint on the healing of the paralysis
+of the abducens, one would have been able to combine shortening of the
+right abducens with tenotomy of the internus in the first operation,
+whereas the necessity for the advancement was only shown by the
+abnormally slight effect of the tenotomy on the left side. According to
+accounts received by letter the favorable result has continued.
+
+We obtain a result more quickly by the immediate advancement of the
+abducens. For example:
+
+CASE 50.--Mr. K--, æt. 29, suffered from paresis of the right abducens
+in the autumn of 1877. In December, 1878, convergent squint is present,
+linear deviation 5 mm. (scarcely more on the left than on the right).
+The defect of movement towards the side of the right abducens amounts to
+about 2 or 3 mm. Diplopia is present in the whole visual field with
+increase of the deviation towards the right. Emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness on both sides. Tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement
+of the abducens of the right eye at the end of December. Three weeks
+later single vision is present in the middle line; on the left limit of
+the visual field crossed double images, on the right side homonymous
+ones, beginning about 20° from the middle line. The result was by no
+means excessive.
+
+In convergent squint with congenital paresis of the abducens, not much
+can be attained without shortening the abducens. Of course only the
+squint can be removed, not the paralysis, but if once a correct position
+is attained for the middle line, cosmetic demands are satisfied; the
+outward movement, which is absent, must be replaced by turning the
+head.
+
+The chief method for absolute divergent squint is the combination of
+shortening with tenotomy of the externus. If the impulse for convergence
+is once lost, so that an associated movement occurs in place of an
+accommodative one on fixation of a point situated on the middle line, a
+removal of the squint cannot be obtained by simple tenotomy of the
+externi--another proof that a change of position of the eye is by no
+means a necessary result of tenotomy.
+
+Moreover, this slight aid given by tenotomy has its ground not solely in
+the condition of the opposing recti muscles. In other practices I have
+seen cases enough in which tenotomy of the externi, performed on account
+of relative divergence, was followed by convergent squint, just as
+injudicious division of the interni may induce divergent squint. It is
+probable, therefore, that the faulty effect of simple tenotomy in
+permanent absolute divergent squint depends on other causes, which, in
+my opinion, are to be found in the obliques. The loop formed by the
+obliques round the posterior circumference of the eye is most stretched,
+when the visual line falls in with the muscular plane of the obliques in
+a medial direction of the eyes. On the whole, then, it is proved that
+the obliques are extended on turning the eyes inwards, but shortened on
+turning the eyes outwards by means of their muscular action. In
+divergent squint, if the movement inwards occurs but seldom or not at
+all, the obliques consequently are not extended in a normal way--it
+follows then that they lose in ductility, offer greater resistance to
+the inward movement, and by means of their elastic tension continually
+draw the posterior pole of the eye inwards and the cornea outwards. As
+in strabotomy we cannot get at the obliques, it seems all the more
+desirable to offer them stronger resistance by greater tension of the
+internus by means of advancement. Certainly tenotomy of the external
+rectus of the fixing eye is as a rule also necessary. A sufficient
+result is usually thus obtained at once; if it is much lessened in the
+course of one or two months there is nothing to prevent the repetition
+of the tenotomy of one or the other external rectus.
+
+The innervation for the movement of convergence is not always perfectly
+lost; it withdraws itself from the influence of binocular fusion because
+this is gradually forgotten while a convergence, even if an insufficient
+one, unites itself with the effort of accommodation. If we ask such
+patients to fix a large object lying near, a pencil, for example, they
+cannot usually converge upon it, whilst if we ask them to read at the
+same distance, a distinct convergent movement occurs; large objects are
+sufficiently clearly recognised, even without distinct retinal images,
+and the supposition that an effort of accommodation is present is only
+justified if we employ sufficiently small objects at the examination, in
+order to distinguish which, clear retinal images are necessary. Of
+course we must have regard to the condition of refraction; myopes, who
+use their far point for reading, want no accommodation, therefore no
+convergent movement occurs, even if the impulse of innervation for it,
+is not yet quite lost. However, the innervation for convergence may be
+lost, without the internal recti losing in elastic tension. The
+operative importance of this relation may be illustrated by an example.
+
+CASE 51.--Bertha K--, æt. 10, has myopia 5 D. on both sides, visual
+acuteness 12/20, and divergent strabismus. At 4 mm. the crossed diplopia
+is corrected by prism 23°; a convergent movement is no longer attained,
+at most parallelism of the visual axes. Tenotomy of both interni on
+October 2nd, 1873. The immediate result was convergent squint, with a
+defect in movement outwards amounting to 4 to 5 mm. in both eyes. On
+October 9th prism 37° was still necessary to unite the homonymous double
+images at a distance of 4 m.; single vision existed only to about 20 cm.
+The area of single vision gradually extended itself; at the end of
+October it was restored for distance also, facultative divergence
+_nil_; however, relative divergence was present for near objects.
+Naturally this was not the result of muscular weakness of the interni,
+for they had proved their capabilities by a convergent squint,
+fortunately only temporary, which made one anxious, but was solely the
+result of a faulty innervation. The further course was also interesting.
+After three years, in October, 1876, the myopia of the left eye amounted
+to 8 D., that of the right 7 D., visual acuteness 1/2 on the right, on
+the left 3/4 of the normal; a posterior staphyloma measuring about 1/3
+of the diameter of the optic disc was present. The left eye was used for
+near objects with relative divergence of the right and the occasional
+occurrence of diplopia; there was convergence only to about 15 cm.
+Facultative divergence _nil_.
+
+We very frequently have the opportunity of seeing, that myopia increases
+even after tenotomy of the externus, and if von Graefe's assertion that
+the progress of myopia would be brought to a standstill by means of
+tenotomy still finds believers, I should like to cite one example which
+offers proof to the contrary.
+
+In permanent divergent squint we shall have, as a rule, to combine
+shortening of the internus of the squinting eye with tenotomy of both
+externi, even if the convergent movement is still possible to a slight
+degree. The result thus obtained differs somewhat; sometimes it suffices
+at once, sometimes a repetition of the separation of the externi is
+necessary later on. Two examples may illustrate this.
+
+CASE 52.--Miss Marie M--, æt. 22, has squinted on the left side since
+her third year, nominally after a keratitis, which left behind in the
+left eye a nebula of the cornea of small circumference. The deviation
+amounts to 8 mm. The visual power is much worse than the opacity of the
+cornea leads us to suppose, with visual axes deviating inwards fingers
+were only counted at a distance of about 1 m.
+
+On the right myopia 1 D., V. = 4/5. A slight convergent movement is
+still practicable. At the end of May, 1879, shortening of the left
+internal rectus, tenotomy of both externi. The next day slight
+convergence on viewing distant objects, correct position after four
+days. In January, 1880, correct position of the eyes, convergence
+possible to about 20 cm. While a correction of 8 mm. was immediately
+obtained here, the same operation does not always permanently suffice
+for slighter deviations.
+
+CASE 53.--Ernest Sp--, æt. 11-1/2; divergent squint had been observed as
+early as his second year. The deviation amounts to 5 or 6 mm., is
+sometimes alternating, generally the left eye deviates. No convergent
+movement on fixing a pencil about 25 cm. distant; the right eye is then
+used for reading, the left one makes a distinct, but not a sufficient,
+movement inwards. Emmetropia on both sides, visual acuteness nearly
+perfect on the right, on the left 2/3 of the normal. Even with red glass
+and prisms deviating in a vertical direction, double images not
+perceived. On October 2nd, 1879, shortening of the left internal rectus,
+tenotomy of both externi. A week later divergence was no longer present.
+When reading, the left eye makes a distinct, perhaps rather too great,
+movement of convergence, and yet six weeks after the operation, distinct
+divergent squint was again present, even if to a slighter degree than
+before; the left eye deviates 3 to 4 mm., the right 2 to 3 mm. outwards.
+The result obtained amounted then to not more than about 3 mm. In the
+middle of December the tenotomy of both externi was therefore repeated.
+A week after the operation convergent squint of 2 mm. is present with
+homonymous diplopia. A pencil made to approach on the middle line is
+seen double to about 20 cm., on approaching nearer, double images are
+not perceived in spite of distinct relative divergence. Double images at
+a distance of 4 m. are corrected by prism 25°; as, however, normal
+binocular vision is not present, the value of this statement is very
+questionable. Three weeks after the second operation the position of the
+eyes was normal, and the slightest convergence was perceived only on
+close investigation. Double images are no longer observed, however they
+may still be brought to view.
+
+In periodic divergent squint, if the deviation is considerable and
+frequent, if at the same time the normal near point of convergence is
+only attained with difficulty or not at all, we can hardly combine
+shortening of the internus with tenotomy of the externus; more often
+indeed, additional tenotomy of the externus of the other eye is
+necessary in order to obtain a permanent cure. In exceptional cases
+(when it seemed to me as if the squint depended more on insufficiency of
+the internus than on preponderance of the externus) I have confined
+myself to shortening the internus without separating the externus; I
+will quote just one example of this.
+
+CASE 54.--Ida K--, æt. 11. On the right, hypermetropia 3 D. with the
+ophthalmoscope, visual acuteness 5/24. No. 0·3 is read with difficulty.
+On the left, with the ophthalmoscope hypermetropia 4·5 D. with
+asymmetric meridian. Single letters of 3·0 m. are recognised with convex
+6·5 D. Fingers are counted at about 1-1/2 m. The choroid is slightly and
+unequally pigmented, no ophthalmoscopically assignable reason exists for
+the considerable visual defect. The left eye frequently deviates
+outwards, convergence is attainable to 15 cm. On May 2nd, 1877,
+shortening of the internus (without tenotomy of the externus). Two weeks
+later slight convergent squint was present; in November, 1877, six
+months after the operation, the position of the left eye was perfectly
+normal.
+
+Tenotomy of the externi suffices when the divergent deviation is
+inconsiderable and does not occur often, if the normal near point of
+convergence can still be reached, and binocular fusion is possible.
+
+If we want to increase the effect of simple tenotomy of the externi,
+this may be done just as well by practice of the associated movements of
+the eyes as by practice of the convergence, of course for a short time
+only after the operation. As long as the detached tendon of the external
+rectus is not re-attached firmly with the sclerotic, all these movements
+of the eyes help to strengthen the result of the tenotomy. In order to
+practise convergence we can bring a suitable fixed point on to a mirror
+and so make it possible for the patient himself to see the position of
+his eyes, of course only in cases where binocular fusion is no longer
+present. He who possesses a normal binocular vision is troubled in these
+exercises by diplopia; but this is not the case in the suppression of
+binocular fusion so frequent as a result of squint.
+
+Periodic divergent squint is divided by no sharply defined limits from
+those cases in which only a preponderance of the externi exists without
+insufficiency of the interni. We frequently find very considerable
+degrees of facultative divergence as a casual symptom, without the
+occurrence of manifest divergence or the presence of asthenopic
+troubles. If this is accompanied by weakness of the interni, absolute
+divergence occurs on looking at near objects, sometimes for distance
+also and certainly if we suppress binocular fusion by covering one eye
+or render it difficult by colouring one visual field with a red glass.
+
+In these cases the indications for the operation are given either by
+asthenopia, by troublesome double images or by the disfigurement
+inseparable from periodic squint; it will depend on the degree of the
+facultative divergence, whether we confine the tenotomy of the externus
+to one eye or whether we distribute it between both eyes.
+
+Finally, it may be desirable to still say a few words as to the most
+favorable period for the operation. The comprehension of the defective
+sight often present in squint as caused by "non-use" has resulted in
+the preposterous advice that tenotomy should be carried out as early as
+possible. I can vouch for the fact that even the earliest tenotomy of
+the ocular muscles is of no avail against congenital amblyopia. I have
+repeatedly seen children on whom tenotomy had been performed in their
+first year, usually with bad cosmetic result but with continuance of
+defective sight of the squinting eye.
+
+The final result of the operation is almost always very unsatisfactory
+when performed on children before their fourth year. I can show a number
+of good results in children on whom I operated between their fifth and
+sixth year; however, the more I considered the subject, the more it
+seemed to me advisable to raise the tests which must be imposed on the
+patients. With children it is not so much a question of determining the
+limit of age, but whether their intelligence is sufficiently developed
+to render a reliable examination possible. A sufficient knowledge of
+letters and the power of reading is necessary to an accurate trial of
+vision; the entire bearing of the children must permit of the
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of the weak condition and should raise no
+scruples as to wearing spectacles which may be necessary after the
+operation. Under any circumstances no harm is done by deferring the
+operation until these conditions are fulfilled; the interval may be
+filled up by practising the mobility of the eyes, which does more good
+than the customary strabismus spectacles or even tying up the eye. If we
+tie up the fixing eye, the squinting one is certainly put into fixation,
+but the other squints instead, and of course it is just the same with
+the plan, as childish as it is antiquated, of tying on a pierced walnut
+shell before each eye.
+
+Strabismus spectacles, _i. e._ those with a leather band to go round the
+head, provided with leaden discs which cover one eye completely and
+leave only a side aperture for the other, of course only induce a
+transfer of the squint to the covered eye, together with practice of
+the eye in a lateral direction; but apart from their unsightly
+appearance they require a constant lateral direction of the eye, which
+is followed even after a short time by fatigue of the muscles employed
+and soon becomes unbearable. This is not the case if we cause the
+mobility to be practised alternately and towards both sides; here we
+must insist that the limits of the outward movement are really reached.
+These exercises are at least rational and tend to increase the strength
+of the antagonist, on which we must depend so much in the operation and
+to diminish an insufficiency made worse by want of practice.
+
+
+PRINTED BY ADLARD AND SON, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+Catalogue B] _London, 11, New Burlington Street March, 1887_
+
+
+_SELECTION_
+
+FROM
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE
+
+COMPRISING
+
+_ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM_
+
+ON THE
+
+ART AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE
+
+[Illustration]
+
+N.B.--As far as possible, this List is arranged in the order in which
+medical study is usually pursued.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL publish for the following Institutions and Public
+Bodies:--
+
+ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS.
+ CATALOGUES OF THE MUSEUM.
+ Twenty-three separate Catalogues (List and Prices can be obtained of J.
+& A. CHURCHILL).
+
+GUY'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Vol. XXVIII., Third Series. 7s. 6d.
+ FORMULÆ USED IN THE HOSPITAL IN ADDITION TO THOSE
+ IN THE B. P. 1s. 6d.
+
+LONDON HOSPITAL.
+ PHARMACOPOEIA OF THE HOSPITAL. 3s.
+ CLINICAL LECTURES AND REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND
+ SURGICAL STAFF. Vols. I. to IV. 7s. 6d. each.
+
+ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S HOSPITAL.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE ANATOMICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL
+ MUSEUM. Vol. I.--Pathology. 15s. Vol. II.--Teratology, Anatomy
+ and Physiology, Botany. 7s. 6d.
+
+ST. GEORGE'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ The last Volume (X.) was issued in 1880. Price 7s. 6d.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 15s.
+ SUPPLEMENTARY CATALOGUE (1882). 5s.
+
+ST. THOMAS'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Annually. Vol. XV., New Series. 7s. 6d.
+
+MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 12s.
+
+WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Annually. Vol. II. 6s.
+
+ROYAL LONDON OPHTHALMIC HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Occasionally. Vol. XI., Part III. 5s.
+
+OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.
+ TRANSACTIONS.
+ Vol. VI. 12s. 6d.
+
+MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION.
+ JOURNAL OF MENTAL SCIENCE.
+ Quarterly. 3s. 6d. each, or 14s. per annum.
+
+PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
+ PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS.
+ Every Saturday. 4d. each, or 20s. per annum, post free.
+
+BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE.
+ YEAR BOOK OF PHARMACY.
+ In December. 10s.
+
+BRITISH DENTAL ASSOCIATION.
+ JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION AND MONTHLY REVIEW
+ OF DENTAL SURGERY.
+ On the 15th of each Month. 6d. each, or 7s. per annum, post free.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+A SELECTION
+
+from
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE,
+
+comprising
+
+ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE.
+
+N.B.--_J. & A. Churchill's Descriptive List of Works on Chemistry,
+Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the Microscope,
+and other Branches of Science, can be had on application._
+
+Practical Anatomy: A Manual of Dissections. By CHRISTOPHER HEATH,
+Surgeon to University College Hospital. Sixth Edition. Revised by
+RICKMAN J. GODLEE, M.S. Lond., F.R.C.S., Demonstrator of Anatomy in
+University College, and Assistant Surgeon to the Hospital. Crown 8vo,
+with 24 Coloured Plates and 274 Engravings, 15s.
+
+Wilson's Anatomist's Vade-Mecum. Tenth Edition. By GEORGE BUCHANAN,
+Professor of Clinical Surgery in the University of Glasgow; and HENRY E.
+CLARK, M.R.C.S., Lecturer on Anatomy at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary
+School of Medicine. Crown 8vo, with 450 Engravings (including 26
+Coloured Plates), 18s.
+
+Braune's Atlas of Topographical Anatomy, after Plane Sections of Frozen
+Bodies. Translated by EDWARD BELLAMY, Surgeon to, and Lecturer on
+Anatomy, &c., at, Charing Cross Hospital. Large Imp. 8vo, with 34
+Photolithographic Plates and 46 Woodcuts, 40s.
+
+An Atlas of Human Anatomy. By RICKMAN J. GODLEE, M.S., F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon and Senior Demonstrator of Anatomy, University College
+Hospital. With 48 Imp. 4to Plates (112 figures), and a volume of
+Explanatory Text. 8vo, £4 14s. 6d.
+
+Harvey's (Wm.) Manuscript Lectures. Prelectiones Anatomiæ Universalis.
+Edited, with an Autotype reproduction of the Original, by a Committee of
+the Royal College of Physicians of London. Crown 4to, half bound in
+Persian, 52s. 6d.
+
+Anatomy of the Joints of Man. By HENRY MORRIS, Surgeon to, and Lecturer
+on Anatomy and Practical Surgery at, the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with
+44 Lithographic Plates (several being coloured) and 13 Wood Engravings,
+16s.
+
+Manual of the Dissection of the Human Body. By LUTHER HOLDEN, Consulting
+Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Edited by JOHN LANGTON, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to, and Lecturer on Anatomy at, St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+Fifth Edition. 8vo, with 208 Engravings. 20s.
+
+_By the same author._
+
+Human Osteology. Sixth Edition, edited by the Author and JAMES SHUTER,
+F.R.C.S., M.A., M.B., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo, with 61 Lithographic Plates and 89 Engravings. 16s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Landmarks, Medical and Surgical. Fourth Edition. 8vo. [_In the Press._
+
+The Student's Guide to Surgical Anatomy. By EDWARD BELLAMY, F.R.C.S. and
+Member of the Board of Examiners. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 81
+Engravings. 7s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Human Osteology. By WILLIAM WARWICK WAGSTAFFE,
+late Assistant Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with 23
+Plates and 66 Engravings. 10s. 6d.
+
+The Anatomical Remembrancer; or, Complete Pocket Anatomist. Eighth
+Edition. 32mo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diagrams of the Nerves of the Human Body, exhibiting their Origin,
+Divisions, and Connections, with their Distribution to the Various
+Regions of the Cutaneous Surface, and to all the Muscles. By W. H.
+FLOWER, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. Third Edition, with 6 Plates. Roya. 4to, 12s.
+
+General Pathology. An Introduction to. By JOHN BLAND SUTTON, F.R.C.S.,
+Sir E. Wilson Lecturer on Pathology, R.C.S.; Assistant Surgeon to, and
+Lecturer on Anatomy at, Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with 149 Engravings,
+14s.
+
+Atlas of Pathological Anatomy. By Dr. LANCEREAUX. Translated by W. S.
+GREENFIELD, M.D., Professor of Pathology in the University of Edinburgh.
+Imp. 8vo, with 70 Coloured Plates, £5 5s.
+
+A Manual of Pathological Anatomy. By C. HANDFIELD JONES, M.B., F.R.S.,
+and E. H. SIEVEKING, M.D., F.R.C.P. Edited by J. F. Payne, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on General Pathology at St. Thomas's Hospital. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 195 Engravings, 16s.
+
+Post-mortem Examinations: A Description and Explanation of the Method of
+Performing them, with especial reference to Medico-Legal Practice. By
+Prof. VIRCHOW. Translated by Dr. T. P. SMITH. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+with 4 Plates, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Human Brain: Histological and Coarse Methods of Research. A Manual
+for Students and Asylum Medical Officers. By W. BEVAN LEWIS, L.R.C.P.
+Lond., Medical Superintendent, West Riding Lunatic Asylum. 8vo, with
+Wood Engravings and Photographs, 8s.
+
+Manual of Physiology: For the use of Junior Students of Medicine. By
+GERALD F. YEO, M.D., F.R.C.S., Professor of Physiology in King's
+College, London. Crown 8vo, with 300 Engravings, 14s.
+
+Principles of Human Physiology. By W. B. CARPENTER, C.B., M.D., F.R.S.
+Ninth Edition. By HENRY POWER, M.B., F.R.C.S. 8vo, with 3 Steel Plates
+and 377 Wood Engravings, 31s. 6d.
+
+Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on Physiology. By PHILIP H. PYE-SMITH,
+B.A., M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with
+Diagrams, Notes, and Tables, 5s.
+
+A Treatise on Human Physiology. By JOHN C. DALTON, M.D. Seventh Edition.
+8vo, with 252 Engravings, 20s.
+
+Elementary Practical Biology: Vegetable. By THOMAS W. SHORE, M.D., B.Sc.
+Lond., Lecturer on Comparative Anatomy at St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo. 6s.
+
+Histology and Histo-Chemistry of Man. By HEINRICH FREY, Professor of
+Medicine in Zurich. Translated by ARTHUR E. J. BARKER, Assistant Surgeon
+to University College Hospital. 8vo, with 608 Engravings, 21s.
+
+A Text-Book of Medical Physics, for Students and Practitioners. By J. C.
+DRAPER, M.D., LL.D., Professor of Physics in the University of New York.
+With 377 Engravings. 8vo, 18s.
+
+The Law of Sex. By G. B. STARKWEATHER, F.R.G.S. With 40 Illustrative
+Portraits. 8vo, 16s.
+
+Influence of Sex in Disease. By W. ROGER WILLIAMS, F.R.C.S., Surgical
+Registrar to the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Medical Jurisprudence: Its Principles and Practice. By ALFRED S. TAYLOR,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Third Edition, by THOMAS STEVENSON, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Medical Jurisprudence at Guy's Hospital. 2 vols.
+8vo, with 188 Engravings, 31s. 6d.
+
+By the same Authors.
+
+A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence. Eleventh Edition. Crown 8vo, with 56
+Engravings, 14s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Poisons, In Relation to Medical Jurisprudence and Medicine. Third
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 104 Engravings, 16s.
+
+Lectures on Medical Jurisprudence. By FRANCIS OGSTON, M.D., late
+Professor in the University of Aberdeen. Edited by FRANCIS OGSTON, Jun.,
+M.D. 8vo, with 12 Copper Plates, 18s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Medical Jurisprudence. By JOHN ABERCROMBIE, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Forensic Medicine to Charing Cross Hospital. Fcap.
+8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Microscopical Examination of Drinking Water and of Air. By J. D.
+MACDONALD, M.D., F.R.S., Ex-Professor of Naval Hygiene in the Army
+Medical School. Second Edition. 8vo, with 25 Plates, 7s. 6d.
+
+Pay Hospitals and Paying Wards throughout the World. By HENRY C.
+BURDETT. 8vo, 7s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Cottage Hospitals--General, Fever, and Convalescent: Their Progress,
+Management, and Work. Second Edition, with many Plans and Illustrations.
+Crown 8vo, 14s.
+
+A Manual of Practical Hygiene. By F. A. PARKES, M.D., F.R.S. Sixth
+Edition, by F. DE CHAUMONT, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Military Hygiene
+in the Army Medical School. 8vo, with numerous Plates and Engravings.
+18s.
+
+A Handbook of Hygiene and Sanitary Science. By GEO. WILSON, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.S.E., Medical Officer of Health for Mid-Warwickshire. Sixth Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings. 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Healthy Life and Healthy Dwellings: A Guide to Personal and Domestic
+Hygiene. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Sanitary Examinations Of Water, Air, and Food. A Vade-Mecum for the
+Medical Officer of Health. By CORNELIUS B. FOX, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 110 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Dangers to Health: A Pictorial Guide to Domestic Sanitary Defects. By T.
+PRIDGIN TEALE, M.A., Surgeon to the Leeds General Infirmary. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 70 Lithograph Plates (mostly coloured), 10s.
+
+Hospitals, Infirmaries, and Dispensaries: Their Construction, Interior
+Arrangement, and Management; with Descriptions of existing Institutions,
+and 74 Illustrations. By F. OPPERT, M.D., M.R.C.P.L. Second Edition.
+Royal 8vo, 12s.
+
+Hospital Construction and Management. By F. J. MOUAT, M.D., Local
+Government Board Inspector, and H. SAXON SNELL, Fell. Roy. Inst. Brit.
+Architects. In 2 Parts, 4to, 15s. each; or, the whole work bound in half
+calf, with large Map, 54 Lithographic Plates, and 27 Woodcuts, 35s.
+
+Manual of Anthropometry: A Guide to the Measurement of the Human Body,
+containing an Anthropometrical Chart and Register, a Systematic Table of
+Measurements, &c. By CHARLES ROBERTS, F.R.C.S. 8vo, with numerous
+Illustrations and Tables, 8s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Detection of Colour-Blindness and Imperfect Eyesight. 8vo, with a Table
+of Coloured Wools, and Sheet of Test-types, 5s.
+
+Illustrations of the Influence of the Mind upon the Body in Health and
+Disease; Designed to elucidate the Action of the Imagination. By DANIEL
+HACK TUKE, M.D., F.R.C.P., LL.D. Second Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism. 8vo, 5s.
+
+A Manual of Psychological Medicine. With an Appendix of Cases. By JOHN
+C. BUCKNILL, M.D., F.R.S., and D. HACK TUKE, M.D., F.R.C.P. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 12 Plates (30 Figures) and Engravings, 25s.
+
+Mental Diseases. Clinical Lectures. By T. S. CLOUSTON, M.D., F.R.C.P.
+Edin., Lecturer on Mental Diseases in the University of Edinburgh. With
+8 Plates (6 Coloured). Crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Private Treatment of the Insane as Single Patients. By EDWARD EAST,
+M.R.C.S., L.S.A. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Manual of Midwifery. By ALFRED L. GALABIN, M.A., M.D., F.R.C.P.,
+Obstetric Physician to, and Lecturer on Midwifery, &c. at, Guy's
+Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 227 Engravings, 15s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Practice of Midwifery. By D. LLOYD ROBERTS,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Clinical Midwifery and Diseases of Women at
+the Owens College; Obstetric Physician to the Manchester Royal
+Infirmary. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 2 Coloured Plates and 127 Wood
+Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on Obstetric Operations: Including the Treatment of Hæmorrhage,
+and forming a Guide to the Management of Difficult Labour. By ROBERT
+BARNES, M.D., F.R.C.P., Consulting Obstetric Physician to St. George's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 121 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Clinical History of Medical and Surgical Diseases of Women. Second
+Edition. 8vo, with 181 Engravings, 28s.
+
+Clinical Lectures on Diseases of Women: Delivered in St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital, by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. Third Edition. 8vo,
+16s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Sterility in Woman. Being the Gulstonian Lectures, delivered in the
+Royal College of Physicians, in Feb., 1883. 8vo, 6s.
+
+Notes on Diseases of Women: Specially designed to assist the Student in
+preparing for Examination. By J. J. REYNOLDS, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. Third
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Notes on Midwifery: Specially designed for Students preparing for
+Examination. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 15 Engravings, 4s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Diseases of Women. By ALFRED L. GALABIN,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Obstetric Physician to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+West on the Diseases of Women. Fourth Edition, revised by the Author,
+with numerous Additions by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S.E.,
+Obstetric Physician to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. 8vo, 16s.
+
+Dysmenorrhoea, its Pathology and Treatment. By HEYWOOD SMITH, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Obstetric Aphorisms: For the Use of Students commencing Midwifery
+Practice. By JOSEPH G. SWAYNE, M.D. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Obstetrics. By A. F. A. KING, A.M., M.D., Professor of
+Obstetrics, &c, in the Columbian University, Washington, and the
+University of Vermont. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with 102 Engravings,
+8s.
+
+Handbook of Midwifery for Midwives: By J. E. BURTON, L.R.C.P. Lond.,
+Surgeon to the Hospital for Women, Liverpool. Second Edition. With
+Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 6s.
+
+A Handbook of Uterine Therapeutics, and of Diseases of Women. By E. J.
+TILT, M.D., M.R.C.P. Fourth Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Change of Life In Health and Disease: A Clinical Treatise on the
+Diseases of the Nervous System incidental to Women at the Decline of
+Life. Fourth Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+The Principles and Practice of Gynæcology. By THOMAS ADDIS EMMET, M.D.,
+Surgeon to the Woman's Hospital, New York. Third Edition. Royal 8vo,
+with 150 Engravings, 24s.
+
+Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, and Fallopian Tubes: A Practical
+Treatise by A. COURTY, Professor of Clinical Surgery, Montpellier.
+Translated from Third Edition by his Pupil, AGNES MCLAREN, M.D.,
+M.K.Q.C.P.I., with Preface by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo,
+with 424 Engravings, 24s.
+
+The Female Pelvic Organs: Their Surgery, Surgical Pathology, and
+Surgical Anatomy. In a Series of Coloured Plates taken from Nature; with
+Commentaries, Notes, and Cases. By HENRY SAVAGE, M.D., F.R.C.S.,
+Consulting Officer of the Samaritan Free Hospital. Fifth Edition. Roy.
+4to, with 17 Lithographic Plates(15 coloured) and 52 Woodcuts, £1 15s.
+
+Ovarian and Uterine Tumours: Their Pathology and Surgical Treatment. By
+Sir T. SPENCER WELLS, Bart., F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to the
+Samaritan Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings, 21s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Abdominal Tumours: Their Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of Women. By T. GAILLARD THOMAS,
+M.D., Professor of Diseases of Women in the College of Physicians and
+Surgeons, New York. Fifth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 266 Engravings, 25s.
+
+Backward Displacements of the Uterus and Prolapsus Uteri: Treatment by
+the New Method of Shortening the Round Ligaments. By WILLIAM ALEXANDER,
+M.D., M.Ch.Q.U.I., F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Infirmary. Crown
+8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Diseases of Children. By JAS. F. GOODHART, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital, and to the Evelina Hospital for
+Sick Children. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of Children. For Practitioners and Students. By W. H. DAY,
+M.D., Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo,
+12s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Disease in Children. By EUSTACE SMITH, M.D.,
+Physician to the King of the Belgians, Physician to the East London
+Hospital for Children. 8vo, 22s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Clinical Studies of Disease in Children. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 7s.
+6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children. Fourth Edition. Post 8vo,
+8s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Manual of the Diseases of Children. With a Formulary. By
+EDWARD ELLIS, M.D. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 10s.
+
+A Manual for Hospital Nurses and others engaged in Attending on the
+Sick. By EDWARD J. DOMVILLE, Surgeon to the Exeter Lying-in Charity.
+Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Nursing, Medical and Surgical. By CHARLES J. CULLINGWORTH,
+M.D., Physician to St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester. Second Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Short Manual for Monthly Nurses. Fcap. 8vo, 1s. 6d.
+
+Notes on Fever Nursing. By J. W. ALLAN, M.B., Physician, Superintendent
+Glasgow Fever Hospital. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Outlines of Infectious Diseases: For the use of Clinical Students. Fcap.
+8vo.
+
+Hospital Sisters and their Duties. By EVA C. E. LÜCKES, Matron to the
+London Hospital. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Diseases and their Commencement. Lectures to Trained Nurses. By DONALD
+W. C. HOOD, M.D., M.R.C.P., Physician to the West London Hospital. Crown
+8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Infant Feeding and its Influence on Life; By C. H. F. ROUTH, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo.
+[Preparing.
+
+Manual of Botany: Including the Structure, Classification, Properties,
+Uses, and Functions of Plants. By ROBERT BENTLEY, Professor of Botany in
+King's College and to the Pharmaceutical Society. Fifth Edition. Crown
+8vo, with 1,178 Engravings, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Guide to Structural, Morphological, and Physiological
+Botany. With 660 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Student's Guide to Systematic Botany, including the Classification
+of Plants and Descriptive Botany. Fcap. 8vo, with 350 Engravings, 3s.
+6d.
+
+Medicinal Plants: Being descriptions, with original figures, of the
+Principal Plants employed in Medicine, and an account of their
+Properties and Uses. By Prof. BENTLEY and Dr. H. TRIMEN. In 4 vols.,
+large 8vo, with 306 Coloured Plates, bound in Half Morocco, Gilt Edges,
+£11 11s.
+
+The National Dispensatory: Containing the Natural History, Chemistry,
+Pharmacy, Actions and Uses of Medicines. By ALFRED STILLÉ, M.D., LL.D.,
+and John M. Maisch, Ph.D. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 311 Engravings, 36s.
+
+Royle's Manual of Materia Medica and Therapeutics. Sixth Edition,
+including additions and alterations in the B. P. 1885. By JOHN HARLEY,
+M.D., Physician to St. Thomas's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 139
+Engravings, 15s.
+
+Materia Medica. A Manual for the use of Students. By ISAMBARD OWEN,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Materia Medica, &c., to St. George's
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+Materia Medica and Therapeutics: Vegetable Kingdom--Organic
+Compounds--Animal Kingdom. By CHARLES D. F. PHILLIPS, M.D., F.R.S.
+Edin., late Lecturer on Materia Medica and Therapeutics at the
+Westminster Hospital Medical School. 8vo, 25s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Materia Medica and Therapeutics. By JOHN C.
+THOROWGOOD, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 7s.
+
+The Pharmacopoeia of the London Hospital. Compiled under the direction
+of a Committee appointed by the Hospital Medical Council. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.
+
+A Companion to the British Pharmacopoeia. By PETER SQUIRE, Revised by
+his Sons, P. W. and A. H. Squire. 14th Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Authors._
+
+The Pharmacopoeias of the London Hospitals, arranged in Groups for
+Easy Reference and Comparison. Fifth Edition. 18mo, 6s.
+
+The Prescriber's Pharmacopoeia: The Medicines arranged in Classes
+according to their Action, with their Composition and Doses. By NESTOR
+J. C. TIRARD, M.D., F.R.C.P., Professor of Materia Medica and
+Therapeutics in King's College, London. Sixth Edition. 32mo, bound in
+leather, 3s.
+
+Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Treatise on the Diagnosis and Treatment
+of Disease. By AUSTIN FLINT, M.D., Professor of Medicine in the Bellevue
+Hospital Medical College. 8vo, 20s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Medicine. Sixth Edition. By
+the AUTHOR, and W. H. WELCH, M.D., and AUSTIN FLINT, jun., M.D. 8vo,
+with Engravings, 26s.
+
+Climate and Fevers of India, with a series of Cases (Croonian Lectures,
+1882). By Sir JOSEPH FAYRER, K.C.S.I., M.D. 8vo, with 17 Temperature
+Charts, 12s.
+
+Family Medicine for India. A Manual. By WILLIAM J. MOORE, M.D., C.I.E.,
+Honorary Surgeon to the Viceroy of India. Published under the Authority
+of the Government of India. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with Engravings.
+[_In the Press._
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Manual of the Diseases of India: With a Compendium of Diseases
+generally. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids, in India, at Home, and Abroad.
+Post 8vo, 5s.
+
+Practical Therapeutics: A Manual. By EDWARD J. WARING, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., and DUDLEY W. BUXTON, M.D., B.S. Lond. Fourth Edition. Crown
+8vo, 14s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Bazaar Medicines of India, And Common Medical Plants: With Full Index of
+Diseases, indicating their Treatment by these and other Agents
+procurable throughout India, &c. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+A Commentary on the Diseases of India. By NORMAN CHEVERS, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., Deputy Surgeon-General H. M. Indian Army. 8vo, 24s.
+
+The Principles and Practice of Medicine. By C. HILTON FAGGE, M.D. Edited
+by P. H. PYE-SMITH, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to, and Lecturer on
+Medicine at, Guy's Hospital. 2 vols. 8vo, 1860 pp. Cloth, 36s.; Half
+Persian, 42s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Practice of Medicine. By MATTHEW CHARTERIS,
+M.D., Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Glasgow. Fourth
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings on Copper and Wood. 9s.
+
+Hooper's Physicians' Vade-Mecum. A Manual of the Principles and Practice
+of Physic. Tenth Edition. By W. A. GUY, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., and J. HARLEY,
+M.D., F.R.C.P. With 118 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Clinical Medicine and Case-Taking. By FRANCIS
+WARNER, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+How to Examine the Chest: Being a Practical Guide for the use of
+Students. By SAMUEL WEST, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the City of
+London Hospital for Diseases of the Chest; Medical Tutor and Registrar
+at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. With 42 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+The Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, and its Antiseptic
+Treatment. By J. BURNEY YEO, M.D., Physician to King's College Hospital.
+Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Operative Treatment of Intra-thoracic Effusion. Fothergillian Prize
+Essay. By NORMAN PORRITT, L.R.C.P. Lond., M.R.C.S. With Engravings.
+Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+Diseases of the Chest: Contributions to their Clinical History,
+Pathology, and Treatment. By A. T. HOUGHTON WATERS, M.D., Physician to
+the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second Edition. 8vo, with Plates, 15s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Medical Diagnosis. By SAMUEL FENWICK, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital, and BEDFORD FENWICK, M.D.,
+M.R.C.P. Sixth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 114 Engravings, 7s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Outlines of Medical Treatment. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+7s.
+
+_Also._
+
+On Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach, and on the Nervous Affections of the
+Digestive Organs. 8vo, 8s.
+
+The Microscope in Medicine. By LIONEL S. BEALE, M.B., F.R.S., Physician
+to King's College Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 86 Plates, 21s.
+
+_Also._
+
+On Slight Ailments: Their Nature and Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, 5s.
+
+The Spectroscope in Medicine. By CHARLES A. MACMUNN, B.A., M.D. 8vo,
+with 3 Chromo-lithographic Plates of Physiological and Pathological
+Spectra, and 13 Engravings, 9s.
+
+Notes on Asthma: Its Forms and Treatment. By JOHN C. THOROWGOOD, M.D.,
+Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Chest. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+What is Consumption? By G. W. HAMBLETON, L.K.Q.C.P.I. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Winter Cough (Catarrh, Bronchitis, Emphysema, Asthma). By HORACE DOBELL,
+M.D., Consulting Physician to the Royal Hospital for Diseases of the
+Chest. Third Edition. 8vo, with Coloured Plates, 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Loss of Weight, Blood-Spitting, and Lung Disease. Second Edition. 8vo,
+with Chromo-lithograph, 10s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Mont Doré Cure, and the Proper Way to Use it. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Pulmonary Consumption: A Practical Treatise on its Cure with Medicinal,
+Dietetic, and Hygienic Remedies. By JAMES WEAVER, M.D., L.R.C.P. Crown
+8vo, 2s.
+
+Croonian Lectures on Some Points in the Pathology and Treatment of
+Typhoid Fever. By WILLIAM CAYLEY, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the
+Middlesex and the London Fever Hospitals. Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Treatment of Some of the Forms of Valvular Disease of the Heart. By A.
+E. SANSOM, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 26 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Heart and Aorta: Clinical Lectures. By G. W. BALFOUR,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Edin., late Senior Physician and Lecturer on
+Clinical Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Chromo-lithograph and Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Medical Ophthalmoscopy: A Manual and Atlas. By WILLIAM R. GOWERS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine in University
+College, and Senior Assistant Physician to the Hospital. Second Edition,
+with Coloured Autotype and Lithographic Plates and Woodcuts. 8vo, 18s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis: A Clinical Lecture. 8vo, with
+Engravings and Plate, 3s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diagnosis of Diseases of the Spinal Cord. Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diagnosis of Diseases of the Brain. 8vo, with Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+A Manual of Diseases of the Nervous System. Vol. I. Diseases of the
+Spinal Cord and Nerves. Roy. 8vo, with 171 Engravings (many figures),
+12s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System. Lectures delivered at Guy's Hospital. By
+SAMUEL WILKS, M.D., F.R.S. Second Edition. 8vo, 18s.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System: Especially in Women. By S. WEIR
+MITCHELL, M.D., Physician to the Philadelphia Infirmary for Diseases of
+the Nervous System. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 8s.
+
+Nerve Vibration and Excitation, as Agents in the Treatment of Functional
+Disorder and Organic Disease. By J. MORTIMER GRANVILLE, M.D. 8vo, 5s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Gout in its Clinical Aspects. Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+Regimen to be adopted in Cases of Gout. By WILHELM EBSTEIN, M.D.,
+Professor of Clinical Medicine in Göttingen. Translated by JOHN SCOTT,
+M.A., M.B. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System. Clinical Lectures. By THOMAS BUZZARD,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the National Hospital for the Paralysed and
+Epileptic. With Engravings, 8vo. 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Some Forms of Paralysis from Peripheral Neuritis: of Gouty, Alcoholic,
+Diphtheritic, and other origin. Crown 8vo, 5s.
+
+Diseases of the Liver: With and without Jaundice. By GEORGE HARLEY,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. 8vo, with 2 Plates and 36 Engravings, 21s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Inflammations of the Liver, and their Sequelæ. Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+Gout, Rheumatism, And the Allied Affections; with Chapters on Longevity
+and Sleep. By PETER HOOD, M.D. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Stomach: The Varieties of Dyspepsia, their Diagnosis and
+Treatment. By S. O. HABERSHON, M.D., F.R.C.P. Third Edition. Crown 8vo,
+5s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pathology of the Pneumogastric Nerve: Lumleian Lectures for 1876. Second
+Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diseases of the Abdomen, Comprising those of the Stomach and other parts
+of the Alimentary Canal, (Esophagus, Cæcum, Intestines, and Peritoneum)
+Third Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 21s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diseases of the Liver, Their Pathology and Treatment. Lettsomian
+Lectures. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+Acute Intestinal Strangulation, And Chronic Intestinal Obstruction (Mode
+of Death from). By THOMAS BRYANT, F.R.C.S., Senior Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. 8vo, 3s.
+
+A Treatise on the Diseases of the Nervous System. By JAMES ROSS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition. 2 vols. 8vo, with Lithographs, Photographs, and 332 Woodcuts,
+52s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Handbook of the Diseases of the Nervous System. Roy. 8vo, with 184
+Engravings, 18s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Aphasia: Being a Contribution to the Subject of the Dissolution of
+Speech from Cerebral Disease. 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease. (Gulstonian Lectures.) By SEYMOUR J.
+SHARKEY, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to, and Joint
+Lecturer on Pathology at, St. Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.
+
+On Megrim, Sick Headache, and some Allied Disorders: A Contribution to
+the Pathology of Nerve Storms. By E. LIVEING, M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo, 15s.
+
+Food and Dietetics, Physiologically and Therapeutically Considered. By
+F. W. PAVY, M.D., F.R.S., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Second Edition.
+8vo, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Croonian Lectures on Certain Points connected with Diabetes. 8vo, 4s.
+6d.
+
+Headaches: Their Nature, Causes, and Treatment. By W. H. DAY, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings. [In the Press.
+
+Health Resorts at Home and Abroad. By MATTHEW CHARTERIS, M.D., Physician
+to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with Map, 4s. 6d.
+
+The Principal Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts: their Climate and
+Medical Aspect. By WILLIAM MARCET, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. With
+Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Winter and Spring On the Shores of the Mediterranean. By HENRY BENNET,
+M.D. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with numerous Plates, Maps, and
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Treatment of Pulmonary Consumption by Hygiene, Climate, and Medicine.
+Third Edition. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+The Riviera: Sketches of the Health-Resorts of the Coast of France and
+Italy, from Hyères to Spezia: its Medical Aspect and Value, &c. By
+EDWARD I. SPARKS, M.B., F.R.C.P. Crown 8vo, 8s. 6d.
+
+Medical Guide to the Mineral Waters of France and its Wintering
+Stations. With a Special Map. By A. VINTRAS, M.D., Physician to the
+French Embassy, and to the French Hospital, London. Crown 8vo, 8s.
+
+The Ocean as a Health-Resort: A Practical Handbook of the Sea, for the
+use of Tourists and Health-Seekers. By WILLIAM S. WILSON, L.R.C.P.
+Second Edition, with Chart of Ocean Routes, &c. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Ambulance Handbook for Volunteers and Others. By J. ARDAVON RAYE, L.K. &
+Q.C.P.I., L.R.C.S.I., late Surgeon to H.B.M. Transport No. 14, Zulu
+Campaign, and Surgeon E.I.R. Rifles. 8vo, with 16 Plates (50 figures),
+3s. 6d.
+
+Ambulance Lectures: To which is added a NURSING LECTURE. By JOHN M. H.
+MARTIN, Honorary Surgeon to the Blackburn Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with 53
+Engravings, 2s.
+
+Handbook of Medical and Surgical Electricity. By HERBERT TIBBITS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P.E., Senior Physician to the West London Hospital for Paralysis
+and Epilepsy. Second Edition. 8vo, with 95 Engravings, 9s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+How to Use a Galvanic Battery in Medicine and Surgery. Third Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 4s.
+
+_Also._
+
+A Map of Ziemssen's Motor Points of the Human Body: A Guide to Localised
+Electrisation. Mounted on Rollers, 35 × 21. With 20 Illustrations, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations Delivered at the School of
+Massage and Electricity. Crown 8vo, with Illustrations, 5s.
+
+Surgical Emergencies: Together with the Emergencies attendant on
+Parturition and the Treatment of Poisoning. By PAUL SWAIN, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the South Devon and East Cornwall Hospital. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with 117 Engravings, 5s.
+
+Operative Surgery in the Calcutta Medical College Hospital. Statistics,
+Cases, and Comments. By KENNETH MCLEOD, A.M., M.D., F.R.C.S.E.,
+Surgeon-Major, Indian Medical Service, Professor of Surgery in Calcutta
+Medical College. 8vo, with Illustrations, 12s. 6d.
+
+A Course of Operative Surgery. By Christopher Heath, Surgeon to
+University College Hospital. Second Edition. With 20 coloured Plates
+(180 figures) from Nature, by M. LÉVEILLÉ, and several Woodcuts. Large
+8vo, 30s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Guide to Surgical Diagnosis. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+6s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Manual of Minor Surgery and Bandaging. For the use of House-Surgeons,
+Dressers, and Junior Practitioners. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 142
+Engravings, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws. Third Edition. 8vo, with Plate and
+206 Wood Engravings, 14s.
+
+Injuries and Diseases of the Neck and Head, the Genito-Urinary Organs,
+and the Rectum. Hunterian Lectures, 1885. By EDWARD LUND, F.R.C.S.,
+Professor of Surgery in the Owens College, Manchester. 8vo, with Plates
+and Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+The Practice of Surgery: A Manual. By Thomas Bryant, Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, with 750 Engravings (many
+being coloured), and including 6 chromo plates, 32s.
+
+The Surgeon's Vade-Mecum: A Manual of Modern Surgery. By R. DRUITT,
+F.R.C.S. Twelfth Edition. By STANLEY BOYD, M.B., F.R.C.S. Assistant
+Surgeon and Pathologist to Charing Cross Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 373
+Engravings 16s.
+
+Regional Surgery: Including Surgical Diagnosis. A Manual for the use of
+Students. By F. A. SOUTHAM, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to
+the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Part I. The Head and Neck. Crown 8vo,
+6s. 6d.--Part II. The Upper Extremity and Thorax. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+Part III. The Abdomen and Lower Extremity. Crown 8vo, 7s.
+
+Surgical Enquiries: Including the Hastings Essay on Shock, the Treatment
+of Inflammations, and numerous Clinical Lectures. By FURNEAUX JORDAN,
+F.R.C.S., Professor of Surgery, Queen's College, Birmingham. Second
+Edition, with numerous Plates. Royal 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Illustrations of Clinical Surgery. By JONATHAN HUTCHINSON, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital. In occasional fasciculi. I. to
+XVIII., 6s. 6d. each. Fasciculi I. to X. bound, with Appendix and Index,
+£3 10s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pedigree of Disease: Being Six Lectures on Temperament, Idiosyncrasy,
+and Diathesis. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Treatment of Wounds and Fractures. Clinical Lectures. By SAMPSON GAMGEE,
+F.R.S.E., Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham. Second Edition.
+8vo, with 40 Engravings, 10s.
+
+Electricity and its Manner of Working in the Treatment of Disease. By
+WM. E. STEAVENSON, M.D., Physician and Electrician to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on Orthopædic Surgery. By BERNARD E. BRODHURST, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Royal Orthopædic Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+On Anchylosis, and the Treatment for the Removal of Deformity and the
+Restoration of Mobility in Various Joints. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Curvatures and Diseases of the Spine. Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 6s.
+
+Diseases of Bones and Joints. By CHARLES MACNAMARA, F.R.C.S., Surgeon
+to, and Lecturer on Surgery at, the Westminster Hospital. 8vo, with
+Plates and Engravings, 12s.
+
+Injuries of the Spine and Spinal Cord, and NERVOUS SHOCK, in their
+Surgical and Medico-Legal Aspects. By HERBERT W. PAGE, M.C. Cantab.,
+F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St. Mary's Hospital. Second Edition, post 8vo, 10s.
+
+Face and Foot Deformities. By FREDERICK CHURCHILL, C.M., Surgeon to the
+Victoria Hospital for Children. 8vo, with Plates and Illustrations, 10s.
+6d.
+
+Clubfoot: Its Causes, Pathology, and Treatment. By WM. ADAMS, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Great Northern Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with 106
+Engravings and 6 Lithographic Plates, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+On Contraction of the Fingers, and its Treatment by Subcutaneous
+Operation; and on Obliteration of Depressed Cicatrices, by the same
+Method. 8vo, with 30 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Lateral and other Forms of Curvature of the Spine: Their Pathology and
+Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Lithographic Plates and 72 Wood
+Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Spinal Curvatures: Treatment by Extension and Jacket; with Remarks on
+some Affections of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle-joints. By H. MACNAUGHTON
+JONES, M.D., F.R.C.S. I. and Edin. Post 8vo, with 63 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+On Diseases and Injuries of the Eye: A Course of Systematic and Clinical
+Lectures to Students and Medical Practitioners. By J. R. WOLFe, M.D.,
+F.R.C.S.E., Lecturer on Ophthalmic Medicine and Surgery in Anderson's
+College, Glasgow. With 10 Coloured Plates and 157 Wood Engravings. 8vo,
+£1 1s.
+
+Hints on Ophthalmic Out-Patient Practice. By CHARLES HIGGENS, Ophthalmic
+Surgeon to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.
+
+Short Sight, Long Sight, and Astigmatism. By GEORGE F. HELM, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., formerly Demonstrator of Anatomy in the Cambridge Medical
+School. Crown 8vo, with 35 Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Manual of the Diseases of the Eye. By CHARLES MACNAMARA, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to Westminster Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with 4
+Coloured Plates and 66 Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Diseases of the Eye. By EDWARD NETTLESHIP,
+F.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fourth Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings and a Set of Coloured Papers illustrating
+Colour-Blindness, [_Nearly Ready._
+
+Normal and Pathological Histology of the Human Eye and Eyelids. By C.
+FRED. POLLOCK, M.D., F.R.C.S. and F.R.S.E., Surgeon for Diseases of the
+Eye to Anderson's College Dispensary, Glasgow. Crown 8vo, with 100
+Plates (230 drawings), 15s.
+
+Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy. Composed of 12 Chromo-lithographic Plates (59
+Figures drawn from nature) and Explanatory Text. By RICHARD LIEBREICH,
+M.R.C.S. Translated by H. ROSBOROUGH SWANZY, M.B. Third edition, 4to,
+40s.
+
+Glaucoma: Its Causes, Symptoms, Pathology, and Treatment. By PRIESTLEY
+SMITH, M.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham.
+8vo, with Lithographic Plates, 10s. 6d.
+
+Refraction of the Eye: A Manual for Students. By GUSTAVUS HARTRIDGE,
+F.R.C.S., Assistant Physician to the Royal Westminster Ophthalmic
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with Lithographic Plate and 94
+Woodcuts, 5s. 6d.
+
+The Electro-Magnet, And its Employment in Ophthalmic Surgery. By SIMEON
+SNELL, Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Sheffield General Infirmary, &c. Crown
+8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate. By FRANCIS MASON, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St.
+Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 6s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Surgery of the Face. 8vo, with 100 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Aural Surgery. By H. MACNAUGHTON JONES, M.D.,
+Professor of the Queen's University in Ireland, late Surgeon to the Cork
+Ophthalmic and Aural Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 63
+Engravings, 8s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Atlas of Diseases of the Membrana Tympani. In Coloured Plates,
+containing 62 Figures, with Text. Crown 4to, 21s.
+
+Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele: Its Etiology, Clinical Characters,
+Pathology, Distribution, Relations to Cretinism, Myxoedema, &c., and
+Treatment. By WILLIAM ROBINSON, M.D. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Diseases and Injuries of the Ear. By Sir WILLIAM B. DALBY, Aural Surgeon
+to St. George's Hospital. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 7s.
+6d.
+
+_By the Same Author._
+
+Short Contributions to Aural Surgery, between 1875 and 1886. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Throat and Nose: A Manual. By MORELL MACKENZIE, M.D.
+Lond., Senior Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat.
+
+Vol. II. Diseases of the Nose and Naso-Pharynx; with a Section on
+Diseases of the Oesophagus. Post 8vo, with 93 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diphtheria: Its Nature and Treatment, Varieties, and Local Expressions.
+8vo, 5s.
+
+Lectures on Syphilis of the Larynx (Lesions of the Secondary and
+Intermediate Stages). By W. M. WHISTLER, M.D., Physician to the Hospital
+for Diseases of the Throat. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+Sore Throat: Its Nature, Varieties, and Treatment. By PROSSER JAMES,
+M.D., Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat. Fifth
+Edition. Post 8vo, with Coloured Plates and Engravings, 6s. 6d.
+
+A Treatise on Vocal Physiology and Hygiene. By GORDON HOLMES, M.D.,
+Physician to the Municipal Throat and Ear Infirmary. Second Edition,
+with Engravings. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Guide to the Use of the Laryngoscope in General Practice. Crown 8vo,
+with Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+A System of Dental Surgery. By Sir JOHN TOMES, F.R.S., and C. S. Tomes,
+M.A., F.R.S. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with many Engravings. [_Nearly
+Ready._
+
+Dental Anatomy, Human and Comparative: A Manual. By CHARLES S. TOMES,
+M.A., F.R.S. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 191 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Dental Anatomy and Surgery. By HENRY SEWILL,
+M.R.C.S., L.D.S. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 5s. 6d.
+
+Notes on Dental Practice. By HENRY C. QUINBY, L.D.S. R.C.S.I. 8vo, with
+87 Engravings, 9s.
+
+Mechanical Dentistry in Gold and Vulcanite. By F. H. BALKWILL, L.D.S.
+R.C.S. 8vo, with 2 Lithographic Plates and 57 Engravings, 10s.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Mechanical Dentistry. By JOSEPH RICHARDSON,
+M.D., D.D.S., late Emeritus Professor of Prosthetic Dentistry in the
+Indiana Medical College. Fourth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 458 Engravings,
+21s.
+
+Principles and Practice of Dentistry: including Anatomy, Physiology,
+Pathology, Therapeutics, Dental Surgery, and Mechanism. By C. A. HARRIS,
+M.D., D.D.S. Edited by F. J. S. GORGAS, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Professor in
+the Dental Department of Maryland University. Eleventh Edition. 8vo,
+with 750 Illustrations, 31s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Dental Mechanics. By OAKLEY COLES, L.D.S. R.C.S. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+Elements of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, with
+Pharmacopoeia. By JAMES STOCKEN, L.D.S. R.C.S., Pereira Prizeman for
+Materia Medica, and THOMAS GADDES, L.D.S. Eng. and Edin. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Dental Medicine: A Manual of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics. By
+F. J. S. GORGAS, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Editor of "Harris's Principles and
+Practice of Dentistry," Professor in the Dental Department of Maryland
+University. 8vo, 14s.
+
+Atlas of Skin Diseases. By TILBURY FOX, M.D., F.R.C.P. With 72 Coloured
+Plates. Royal 4to, half morocco, £6 6s.
+
+Diseases of the Skin: With an Analysis of 8,000 Consecutive Cases and a
+Formulary. By L. D. BULKLEY, M.D., Physician for Skin Diseases at the
+New York Hospital. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Acne: its Etiology, Pathology, and Treatment: Based upon a Study of
+1,500 Cases. 8vo, with Engravings, 10s.
+
+On Certain Rare Diseases of the Skin. By JONATHAN HUTCHINSON, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital, and to the Hospital for Diseases
+of the Skin. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Skin: A Practical Treatise for the Use of Students and
+Practitioners. By J. N. HYDE, A.M., M.D., Professor of Skin and Venereal
+Diseases, Rush Medical College, Chicago. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 17s.
+
+Parasites: A Treatise on the Entozoa of Man and Animals, including some
+Account of the Ectozoa. By T. SPENCER COBBOLD, M.D., F.R.S. 8vo, with 85
+Engravings, 15s.
+
+Manual of Animal Vaccination, preceded by Considerations on Vaccination
+in general. By E. WARLOMONT, M.D., Founder of the State Vaccine
+Institute of Belgium. Translated and edited by ARTHUR J. HARRIES, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Leprosy in British Guiana. By JOHN D. HILLIS, F.R.C.S., M.R.I.A.,
+Medical Superintendent of the Leper Asylum, British Guiana. Imp. 8vo,
+with 22 Lithographic Coloured Plates and Wood Engravings, £1 11s. 6d.
+
+Cancer of the Breast. By THOMAS W. NUNN, F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to
+the Middlesex Hospital. 4to, with 21 Coloured Plates, £2 2s.
+
+On Cancer: Its Allies, and other Tumours; their Medical and Surgical
+Treatment. By F. A. PURCELL, M.D., M.C., Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital,
+Brompton. 8vo, with 21 Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Sarcoma and Carcinoma: Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By
+HENRY T. BUTLIN, F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, with 4 Plates, 8s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Malignant Disease of the Larynx (Sarcoma and Carcinoma). 8vo, with 5
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+Cancerous Affections of the Skin. (Epithelioma and Rodent Ulcer.) By
+GEORGE THIN, M.D. Post 8vo, with 8 Engravings, 5s.
+
+Cancer of the Mouth, Tongue, and Alimentary Tract: their Pathology,
+Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By FREDERIC B. JESSETT, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. 8vo, 10s.
+
+Clinical Notes on Cancer, Its Etiology and Treatment; with special
+reference to the Heredity-Fallacy, and to the Neurotic Origin of most
+Cases of Alveolar Carcinoma. By HERBERT L. SNOW, M.D. Lond., Surgeon to
+the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on the Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs. By REGINALD
+HARRISON, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition, with 48 Engravings. 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Hydrocele: Its several Varieties and their Treatment. By SAMUEL OSBORN,
+late Surgical Registrar to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diseases of the Testis. Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Urinary Organs. Clinical Lectures. By Sir HENRY
+THOMPSON, F.R.C.S., Emeritus Professor of Clinical Surgery in University
+College. Seventh (Students') Edition. 8vo, with 84 Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diseases of the Prostate: Their Pathology and Treatment. Sixth Edition.
+8vo, with 39 Engravings, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Surgery of the Urinary Organs. Some Important Points connected
+therewith. Lectures delivered in the R.C.S. 8vo, with 44 Engravings.
+Students' Edition, 2s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Practical Lithotomy and Lithotrity; or, An Inquiry into the Best Modes
+of Removing Stone from the Bladder. Third Edition. 8vo, with 87
+Engravings, 10s.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Preventive Treatment of Calculous Disease, and the Use of Solvent
+Remedies. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Tumours of the Bladder: Their Nature, Symptoms, and Surgical Treatment.
+8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Stricture of the Urethra, and Urinary Fistulaæ: their Pathology and
+Treatment. Fourth Edition. With 74 Engravings. 8vo, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Suprapubic Operation of Opening the Bladder for the Stone and for
+Tumours. 8vo, with 14 Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Surgery of the Rectum. By HENRY SMITH, Professor of Surgery in
+King's College, Surgeon to the Hospital. Fifth Edition. 8vo, 6s.
+
+Modern Treatment of Stone in the Bladder by Litholopaxy. By P. J.
+FREYER, M.A., M.D., M.Ch., Bengal Medical Service. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.
+
+Diseases of the Testis, Spermatic Cord, and Scrotum. By THOMAS B.
+CURLING, F.R.S., Consulting Surgeon to the London Hospital. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with Engravings, 16s.
+
+Diseases of the Rectum and Anus. By W. HARRISON CRIPPS, F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, &c. 8vo, with 13
+Lithographic Plates and numerous Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Urinary and Renal Derangements and Calculous Disorders. By LIONEL S.
+BEALE, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., Physician to King's College Hospital. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Fistula, Hæmorrhoids, Painful Ulcer, Stricture, Prolapsus, and other
+Diseases of the Rectum: Their Diagnosis and Treatment. By WILLIAM
+ALLINGHAM, Surgeon to St. Mark's Hospital for Fistula. Fourth Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Pathology of the Urine. Including a Complete Guide to its Analysis. By
+J. L. W. THUDICHUM, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition, rewritten and
+enlarged. 8vo, with Engravings, 15s.
+
+Student's Primer on the Urine. By J. TRAVIS WHITTAKER, M.D., Clinical
+Demonstrator at the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow. With 16 Plates etched on
+Copper. Post 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis. By ALFRED COOPER, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the
+Lock Hospital, to St. Mark's and the West London Hospitals. 8vo, 10s.
+6d.
+
+Genito-Urinary Organs, including Syphilis: A Practical Treatise on their
+Surgical Diseases, for Students and Practitioners. By W. H. VAN BUREN,
+M.D., and E. L. KEYES, M.D. Royal 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 21s.
+
+Lectures on Syphilis. By HENRY LEE, Consulting Surgeon to St. George's
+Hospital. 8vo, 10s.
+
+Diagnosis and Treatment of Syphilis. By TOM ROBINSON, M.D., Physician to
+St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder and Prostate Gland. Sixth Edition. By
+WALTER J. COULSON, Surgeon to the Lock Hospital and to St. Peter's
+Hospital for Stone. 8vo, 16s.
+
+The Medical Adviser in Life Assurance. By Sir E. H. SIEVEKING, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+A Medical Vocabulary: An Explanation of all Terms and Phrases used in
+the various Departments of Medical Science and Practice, their
+Derivation, Meaning, Application, and Pronunciation. By R. G. MAYNE,
+M.D., LL.D. Fifth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+A Dictionary of Medical Science: Containing a concise Explanation of the
+various Subjects and Terms of Medicine, &c. By ROBLEY DUNGLISON, M.D.,
+LL.D. Royal 8vo, 28s.
+
+Medical Education And Practice in all parts of the World. By H. J.
+HARDWICKE, M.D., M.R.C.P. 8vo, 10s.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX.
+
+
+Abercrombie's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Adams (W.) on Clubfoot, 11;
+ on Contraction of the Fingers, 11;
+ on Curvature of the Spine, 11
+
+Alexander's Displacements of the Uterus, 6
+
+Allan on Fever Nursing, 7;
+ Outlines of Infectious Diseases, 7
+
+Allingham on Diseases of the Rectum, 14
+
+Anatomical Remembrancer, 3
+
+
+Balfour's Diseases of the Heart and Aorta, 9
+
+Balkwill's Mechanical Dentistry, 12
+
+Barnes (R.) on Obstetric Operations, 5;
+ on Diseases of Women, 5
+
+Beale's Microscope in Medicine, 8;
+ Slight Ailments, 8;
+ Urinary and Renal Derangements, 14
+
+Bellamy's Surgical Anatomy, 3
+
+Bennet (J. H.) on the Mediterranean, 10;
+ on Pulmonary Consumption, 10
+
+Bentley and Trimen's Medicinal Plants, 7
+
+Bentley's Manual of Botany, 7;
+ Structural Botany, 7;
+ Systematic Botany, 7
+
+Braune's Topographical Anatomy, 3
+
+Brodhurst's Anchylosis, 11;
+ Curvatures, &c., of the Spine, 11;
+ Orthopædic Surgery, 11
+
+Bryant's Acute Intestinal Strangulation, 9;
+ Practice of Surgery, 11
+
+Bucknill and Tuke's Psychological Medicine, 5
+
+Bulkley's Acne, 13;
+ Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+Burdett's Cottage Hospitals, 4;
+ Pay Hospitals, 4
+
+Burton's Midwifery for Midwives, 6
+
+Butlin's Malignant Disease of the Larynx, 13;
+ Sarcoma and Carcinoma, 13
+
+Buzzard's Diseases of the Nervous System, 9;
+ Peripheral Neuritis, 9
+
+
+Carpenter's Human Physiology, 4
+
+Cayley's Typhoid Fever, 8
+
+Charteris on Health Resorts, 10;
+ Practice of Medicine, 8
+
+Chavers' Diseases of India, 8
+
+Churchill's Face and Foot Deformities, 11
+
+Clouston's Lectures on Mental Diseases, 5
+
+Cobbold on Parasites, 13
+
+Coles' Dental Mechanics, 13
+
+Cooper's Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis, 14
+
+Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder, 14
+
+Courty's Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, &c., 6
+
+Cripps' Diseases of the Rectum and Anus, 14
+
+Cullingworth's Manual of Nursing, 6;
+ Short Manual for Monthly Nurses, 6
+
+Curling's Diseases of the Testis, 14
+
+
+Dalby's Diseases and Injuries of the Ear, 12
+
+Dalton's Human Physiology, 4
+
+Day on Diseases of Children, 6;
+ on Headaches, 10
+
+Dobell's Lectures on Winter Cough, 8;
+ Loss of Weight, &c., 8;
+ Mont Doré Cure, 8
+
+Domville's Manual for Nurses, 6
+
+Draper's Text Book of Medical Physics, 4
+
+Druitt's Surgeon's Vade-Mecum, 11
+
+Duncan on Diseases of Women, 5;
+ on Sterility in Woman, 5
+
+Dunglison's Medical Dictionary, 14
+
+
+East's Private Treatment of the Insane, 5
+
+Ebstein on Regimen in Gout, 9
+
+Ellis's Diseases of Children, 6
+
+Emmet's Gynæcology, 6
+
+
+Fagge's Principles and Practice of Medicine, 8
+
+Fayrer's Climate and Fevers of India, 7
+
+Fenwick's Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach, 8;
+ Medical Diagnosis, 8;
+ Outlines of Medical Treatment, 8
+
+Flint on Clinical Medicine, 7;
+ on Principles and Practice of Medicine, 7
+
+Flower's Diagrams of the Nerves, 4
+
+Fox's (C. B.) Examinations of Water, Air, and Food, 5
+
+Fox's (T.) Atlas of Skin Diseases, 13
+
+Freyer's Litholopaxy, 14
+
+Frey's Histology and Histo-Chemistry, 4
+
+
+Galabin's Diseases of Women, 6;
+ Manual of Midwifery, 5
+
+Gamgee's Treatment of Wounds and Fractures, 11
+
+Godlee's Atlas of Human Anatomy, 3
+
+Goodhart's Diseases of Children, 6
+
+Gorgas' Dental Medicine, 13
+
+Gowers' Diseases of the Brain, 9;
+ Diseases of the Spinal Cord, 9;
+ Manual of Diseases of Nervous System, 9;
+ Medical Ophthalmoscopy, 9;
+ Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis, 9
+
+Granville on Gout, 9;
+ on Nerve Vibration and Excitation, 9
+
+Guy's Hospital Formulæ, 2;
+ Reports, 2
+
+
+Habershon's Diseases of the Abdomen, 9;
+ Liver, 9;
+ Stomach, 9;
+ Pneumogastric Nerve, 9
+
+Hambleton's What is Consumption?, 8
+
+Hardwicke's Medical Education, 14
+
+Harley on Diseases of the Liver, 9;
+ Inflammations of the Liver, 9
+
+Harris's Dentistry, 13
+
+Harrison's Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs, 13
+
+Hartridge's Refraction of the Eye, 12
+
+Harvey's Manuscript Lectures, 3
+
+Heath's Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws, 10;
+ Minor Surgery and Bandaging, 10;
+ Operative Surgery, 10;
+ Practical Anatomy, 3;
+ Surgical Diagnosis, 10
+
+Helm on Short and Long Sight, &c., 11
+
+Higgens' Ophthalmic Out-patient Practice, 11
+
+Hills' Leprosy in British Guiana, 13
+
+Holden's Dissections, 3;
+ Human Osteology, 3;
+ Landmarks, 3
+
+Holmes' (G.) Guide to Use of Laryngoscope, 12;
+ Vocal Physiology and Hygiene, 12
+
+Hood's (D. C.) Diseases and their Commencement, 7
+
+Hood (P.) on Gout, Rheumatism, &c., 9
+
+Hooper's Physician's Vade-Mecum, 8
+
+Hutchinson's Clinical Surgery, 11;
+ Pedigree of Disease, 11;
+ Rare Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+Hyde's Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+
+James (P.) on Sore Throat, 12
+
+Jessett's Cancer of the Mouth, &c., 13
+
+Jones (C. H.) and Sieveking's Pathological Anatomy, 4
+
+Jones' (H. McN.) Aural Surgery, 12;
+ Atlas of Diseases of Membrana Tympani, 12;
+ Spinal Curvatures, 11
+
+Jordan's Surgical Enquiries, 11
+
+Journal of British Dental Association, 2;
+ Mental Science, 2
+
+
+King's Manual of Obstetrics, 6
+
+
+Lancereaux's Atlas of Pathological Anatomy, 4
+
+Lee (H.) on Syphilis, 14
+
+Lewis (Bevan) on the Human Brain, 4
+
+Liebreich's Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy, 12
+
+Liveing's Megrim, Sick Headache, &c., 9
+
+London Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Lückes' Hospital Sisters and their Duties, 7
+
+Lund's Hunterian Lectures, 10
+
+
+Macdonald's (J. D.) Examination of Water and Air, 4
+
+Mackenzie on Diphtheria, 12;
+ on Diseases of the Throat and Nose, 12
+
+McLeod's Operative Surgery, 10
+
+MacMunn's Spectroscope in Medicine, 8
+
+Macnamara's Diseases of the Eye, 11;
+ Bones and Joints, 11
+
+Marcet's Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts, 10
+
+Martin's Ambulance Lectures, 10
+
+Mason on Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate, 12;
+ on Surgery of the Face, 12
+
+Mayne's Medical Vocabulary, 14
+
+Middlesex Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Mitchell's Diseases of the Nervous System, 9
+
+Moore's Family Medicine for India, 7;
+ Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids, 7;
+ Manual of the Diseases of India, 7
+
+Morris' (H.) Anatomy of the Joints, 3
+
+Mouat and Snell on Hospitals, 5
+
+
+Nettleship's Diseases of the Eye, 12
+
+Nunn's Cancer of the Breast, 13
+
+
+Ogston's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Ophthalmic (Royal London) Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Ophthalmological Society's Transactions, 2
+
+Oppert's Hospitals, Infirmaries, Dispensaries, &c., 5
+
+Osborn on Diseases of the Testis, 13;
+ on Hydrocele, 13
+
+Owen's Materia Medica, 7
+
+
+Page's Injuries of the Spine, 11
+
+Parkes' Practical Hygiene, 5
+
+Pavy on Diabetes, 10
+
+Pavy on Food and Dietetics, 10
+
+Pharmaceutical Journal, 2
+
+Pharmacopoeia of the London Hospital, 7
+
+Phillips' Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 7
+
+Pollock's Histology of the Eye and Eyelids, 12
+
+Porritt's Intra-Thoracic Effusion, 8
+
+Purcell on Cancer, 13
+
+Pye-Smith's Syllabus of Physiology, 4
+
+
+Quinby's Notes on Dental Practice, 12
+
+
+Raye's Ambulance Handbook, 10
+
+Reynolds' (J. J.) Diseases of Women, 5;
+ Notes on Midwifery, 5
+
+Richardson's Mechanical Dentistry, 13
+
+Roberts' (C.) Manual of Anthropometry, 5;
+ Detection of Colour-Blindness, 5
+
+Roberts' (D. Lloyd) Practice of Midwifery, 5
+
+Robinson (Tom) on Syphilis, 14
+
+Robinson (W.) on Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele, 12
+
+Ross's Aphasia, 9;
+ Diseases of the Nervous System, 9;
+ Handbook of ditto, 9
+
+Routh's Infant Feeding, 7
+
+Royal College of Surgeons Museum Catalogues, 2
+
+Royle and Harley's Materia Medica, 7
+
+
+St. Bartholomew's Hospital Catalogue, 2
+
+St. George's Hospital Reports, 2
+
+St. Thomas's Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Sansom's Valvular Disease of the Heart, 8
+
+Savage on the Female Pelvic Organs, 6
+
+Sewill's Dental Anatomy, 12
+
+Sharkey's Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease, 9
+
+Shore's Elementary Practical Biology, 4
+
+Sieveking's Life Assurance, 14
+
+Smith's (E.) Clinical Studies, 6;
+ Diseases in Children, 6;
+ Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children, 6
+
+Smith's (Henry) Surgery of the Rectum, 14
+
+Smith's (Heywood) Dysmenorrhoea, 6
+
+Smith (Priestley) on Glaucoma, 12
+
+Snell's Electro-Magnet in Ophthalmic Surgery, 12
+
+Snow's Clinical Notes on Cancer, 13
+
+Southam's Regional Surgery, 11
+
+Sparks on the Riviera, 10
+
+Squire's Companion to the Pharmacopoeia, 7;
+ Pharmacopoeias of London Hospitals
+
+Starkweather on the Law of Sex, 4
+
+Steavenson's Electricity, 11
+
+Stillé and Maisch's National Dispensatory, 7
+
+Stocken's Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 13
+
+Sutton's General Pathology, 4
+
+Swain's Surgical Emergencies, 10
+
+Swayne's Obstetric Aphorisms, 6
+
+
+Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Taylor's Poisons in relation to Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Teale's Dangers to Health, 5
+
+Thin's Cancerous Affections of the Skin, 13
+
+Thomas's Diseases of Women, 6
+
+Thompson's (Sir H.) Calculous Disease, 14;
+ Diseases of the Prostate, 14;
+ Diseases of the Urinary Organs, 14;
+ Lithotomy and Lithotrity, 14;
+ Stricture of the Urethra, 14;
+ Suprapubic Operation, 14;
+ Surgery of the Urinary Organs, 14;
+ Tumours of the Bladder, 14
+
+Thorowgood on Asthma, 8;
+ on Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 7
+
+Thudichum's Pathology of the Urine, 14
+
+Tibbits' Medical and Surgical Electricity, 10;
+ Map of Motor Points, 10;
+ How to use a Galvanic Battery, 10;
+ Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations, 10
+
+Tilt's Change of Life, 6;
+ Uterine Therapeutics, 6
+
+Tirard's Prescriber's Pharmacopoeia, 7
+
+Tomes' (C. S.) Dental Anatomy, 12
+
+Tomes' (J. and C. S.) Dental Surgery, 12
+
+Tuke's Influence of the Mind upon the Body, 5;
+ Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism, 5
+
+
+Van Buren on the Genito-Urinary Organs, 14
+
+Vintras on the Mineral Waters, &c., of France, 10
+
+Virchow's Post-mortem Examinations, 4
+
+
+Wagstaffe's Human Osteology, 3
+
+Waring's Indian Bazaar Medicines, 8;
+ Practical Therapeutics, 8
+
+Warlomont's Animal Vaccination, 13
+
+Warner's Guide to Medical Case-Taking, 8
+
+Waters' (A. T. H.) Diseases of the Chest, 8
+
+Weaver's Pulmonary Consumption, 8
+
+Wells' (Spencer) Abdominal Tumours, 6;
+ Ovarian and Uterine Tumours, 6
+
+West and Duncan's Diseases of Women, 6
+
+West's (S.) How to Examine the Chest, 8
+
+Whistler's Syphilis of the Larynx, 12
+
+Whittaker's Primer on the Urine, 14
+
+Wilks' Diseases of the Nervous System, 8
+
+Williams' (Roger) Influence of Sex, 4
+
+Wilson's (Sir E.) Anatomists' Vade-Mecum, 3
+
+Wilson's (G.) Handbook of Hygiene, 5;
+ Healthy Life and Dwellings, 5
+
+Wilson's (W. S.) Ocean as a Health-Resort, 10
+
+Wolfe's Diseases and Injuries of the Eye, 11
+
+
+Year Book of Pharmacy, 2
+
+Yeo's (G. F.) Manual of Physiology, 4
+
+Yeo's (J. B.) Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, 8
+
+ * * * * *
+
+The following CATALOGUES issued by J. & A. CHURCHILL will be forwarded
+post free on application:--
+
+A. _J. & A. Churchill's General List of about 650 works on Anatomy,
+Physiology, Hygiene, Midwifery, Materia Medica, Medicine, Surgery,
+Chemistry, Botany, &c., &c., with a complete Index to their Subjects,
+for easy reference._ N.B.--_This List includes_ B, C, & D.
+
+B. _Selection from J. & A. Churchill's General List, comprising all
+recent Works published by them on the Art and Science of Medicine._
+
+C. _J. & A. Churchill's Catalogue of Text Books specially arranged for
+Students._
+
+D. _A selected and descriptive List of J. & A. Churchill's Works on
+Chemistry, Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the
+Microscope, and other branches of Science._
+
+E. _The Half-yearly List of New Works and New Editions published by J. &
+A. Churchill during the previous six months, together with particulars
+of the Periodicals issued from their House._
+
+ [Sent in January and July of each year to every Medical
+ Practitioner in the United Kingdom whose name and address
+ can be ascertained. A large number are also sent to the
+ United States of America, Continental Europe, India, and the
+ Colonies.]
+
+AMERICA.--_J. & A. Churchill being in constant communication with
+various publishing houses in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, are
+able, notwithstanding the absence of international copyright, to conduct
+negotiations favourable to English Authors._
+
+
+LONDON: 11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET.
+_Pardon & Sons, Printers,] [Wine Office Court, Fleet Street, E.C._
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35639-8.txt or 35639-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/6/3/35639/
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/35639-8.zip b/35639-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d5132e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h.zip b/35639-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..edf2987
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h/35639-h.htm b/35639-h/35639-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5beaf77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/35639-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,6930 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of Clinical Investigations On Squint, by Dr. C. Schweigger.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+ p { margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+ }
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+ }
+ hr { width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+ }
+
+ table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
+
+ body{margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ }
+
+ .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+ } /* page numbers */
+
+ .tocnum {position: absolute; top: auto; right: 10%;}
+ .blockquot {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;}
+ .blockquot2 {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 15%;}
+ .center {text-align: center;}
+ .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+ .sig {margin-left: 30em}
+
+ .caption {font-weight: bold;}
+
+ .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;}
+
+ .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top:
+ 1em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;}
+
+ .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;
+ margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;}
+
+ .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;}
+ .poem br {display: none;}
+ .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+ .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 4em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem span.i5 {display: block; margin-left: 5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 6em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem span.i7 {display: block; margin-left: 7em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Schweigger on Squint
+ A Monograph by Dr. C. Schweigger
+
+Author: C. Schweigger
+
+Editor: Gustavus Hartridge
+
+Translator: Emily J. Robinson
+
+Release Date: March 20, 2011 [EBook #35639]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 408px;">
+<img src="images/cover.jpg" width="408" height="650" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<h1>CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON SQUINT</h1>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON SQUINT</h2>
+
+<h3>A MONOGRAPH</h3>
+
+<h3>BY</h3>
+
+<h2><span class="smcap">Dr.</span> C. SCHWEIGGER,</h2>
+
+<h4>PROFESSOR OF OPHTHALMOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN</h4>
+
+<h3>TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN</h3>
+
+<h3>BY</h3>
+
+<h2>EMILY J. ROBINSON</h2>
+
+<h3>EDITED BY</h3>
+
+<h2>GUSTAVUS HARTRIDGE, F.R.C.S.</h2>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 135px;">
+<img src="images/title.jpg" width="135" height="175" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p class="center">
+LONDON<br />
+J. &amp; A. CHURCHILL<br />
+11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET<br />
+1887<br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE</h2>
+
+
+<p>The subject of Squint is so interesting that we venture to think an
+English rendering of this exhaustive monograph will be acceptable to
+many ophthalmic surgeons and students.</p>
+
+<p>While adhering as far as possible to the spirit and style of the
+original we have not hesitated here and there to give a somewhat free
+translation. This has been partly necessitated by the difficulty of
+finding an exact equivalent in English for all the terms used in the
+original text.</p>
+
+<p>In the German Edition the old system of inches is used. We have (with
+the consent of the author) altered these to the dioptric system.</p>
+
+<p class="sig">
+E. J. R.<br />
+G. H.<br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span></p>
+<h2>PREFACE</h2>
+
+
+<p><i>Amicus Plato, amicus Socrates, magis amica veritas.</i> May my friends and
+colleagues, whose views differ from mine, read the following
+observations without prejudice. A fact, which does not agree with the
+system, is generally worth more than theory, still it is very difficult
+for even the most important fact to find recognition if it contradicts
+received opinion. For theories and dogmas are narcotics, which are
+necessary to men; some flatter themselves by composing them, while
+others content themselves by satisfying their own craving for a creed.
+Reasonably applied, they may be useful, but the boundary line is only
+too easily over-stepped. It is the task of science to observe also
+whether theories correspond with the progress of facts. The present
+reigning theory on strabismus will have to submit to various
+limitations; on the other hand, we are ready to leave to the scholastic
+science of medicine and its followers certain dogmas which remain
+unproved and which have nothing but the fact of their existence to
+recommend them.</p>
+
+<p>The small compass of the following treatise proves that it was not
+intended to exhaust the rich literature on the subject; I have only
+referred to the same where it appeared to me necessary for the interest
+of the work in hand.</p>
+
+<p>Above all, it has been my endeavour to treat the subject of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span> this
+treatise (which occurs so frequently in practice) in a way intelligible
+to every physician, at the same time, however, to bring sufficiently
+into notice those facts and views which are of value to my special
+colleagues.</p>
+
+<p class="sig">
+C. SCHWEIGGER.<br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Berlin.</span><br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</a></span></p>
+<h2>INDEX TO CONTENTS.</h2>
+
+
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">Introduction.</span> <span class="tocnum">PAGES</span><br />
+<br />
+Ordinary use of the word squint and its meaning. Apparent<br />
+squint. Paralytic and typical squint. Law of association.<br />
+Squint angle and linear measure of the deviation.<br />
+Permanent, periodic, latent, monolateral, and alternating<br />
+squint <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_1'>1</a>-8</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Convergent Squint.</span><br />
+<br />
+Donders' theory and the test of it by statistics. Limits<br />
+of error in the subjective and objective determination of<br />
+hypermetropia. Statistics of convergent squint. Hypermetropia<br />
+and favouring circumstances. Participation<br />
+of the accommodation. Preponderance of the interni<br />
+and insufficiency of the externi. Nebul&aelig; of the cornea. <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_9'>9</a>-26</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Periodic Convergent Squint.</span><br />
+<br />
+In myopia, emmetropia, and hypermetropia. Intermittent<br />
+squint. Accommodative squint <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_27'>27</a>-35</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Convergent Squint in Myopia</span> <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_36'>36</a>-38</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Squint From Paralysis of the Abducens</span> <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_39'>39</a>-40</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Hysterical Squint</span> <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_41'>41</a>-43</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Divergent Squint.</span><br />
+<br />
+Absolute and relative divergence. Statistics of divergent<br />
+squint. Causes <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_44'>44</a>-49</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Dynamic Squint, Insufficiency of the Interni And<br />
+Muscular Asthenopia.</span><br />
+<br />
+Diplopia and power of overcoming prisms. Facultative<br />
+divergence. Dynamic absolute divergence. Parallel<br />
+strabismus. Relative divergence in myopia. Muscular<br />
+asthenopia. Dynamic relative divergence. Treatment<br />
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</a></span>of muscular asthenopia <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_50'>50</a>-63</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Binocular Vision in Squint.</span><br />
+<br />
+Single vision in squint. Theory of exclusion. Forms of<br />
+binocular vision in squint <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_64'>64</a>-74</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Visual Acuteness of the Squinting Eye.</span><br />
+<br />
+The trial of vision and its results. Appearance, diagnosis.<br />
+Peculiarities and statistics of congenital defective vision.<br />
+Relation of the same to defective vision in squint <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_75'>75</a>-104</span><br />
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Cure of Squint.</span><br />
+<br />
+Spontaneous cure. Voluntary loss of the habit. Cure of<br />
+convergent squint by means of convex glasses. Strabotomy.<br />
+Tenotomy. Advancement. Result of the<br />
+operation and choice of methods. After-treatment by<br />
+means of influence on the ocular muscles and on the<br />
+accommodation. Aim of more extended results of the<br />
+operation. Artificial strabismus. Operation for periodic<br />
+convergent squint. Strabotomy in homonymous diplopia.<br />
+Operation for squint after paralysis of the abducens.<br />
+Operation for divergent squint and for periodic divergence.<br />
+Degree of the result of the operation. Determination<br />
+on the age best suited for operation <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_105'>105</a>-141</span><br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p>
+<h2>SQUINT</h2>
+
+<h3>INTRODUCTION</h3>
+
+
+<p>By squinting, in the German vocabulary, is understood every oblique
+direction of the visual axes. We prefer that the eyes which turn towards
+us should do so in a straight line, and feel it to be something ugly and
+out of harmony, if anyone squints at us. &AElig;sthetic feeling is, however,
+too individual and uncertain a guide to be laid down as a foundation for
+the decision of questions of medicine. Parents have repeatedly brought
+to me children said to squint, when frequent and careful examination of
+them showed normal position of the eyes and perfect binocular vision;
+the over-anxious parents had taken mere physiological convergence or
+side glances for squinting.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, cases appear in which such a strong semblance of
+squinting is present, that at the first glance one cannot say whether
+absolute fixation takes place or not. A very simple examination suffices
+to determine these doubts:&mdash;Cause the patient to gaze at a certain point
+on the horizon and cover first one eye and then the other. If the
+covered eye remains stationary, no squint exists, but if it is observed
+that when giving one eye its freedom and covering the other, the first
+must make a movement in order to fix the object to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span> be looked at, it is
+only a question of discovering whether the squint does not simply ensue
+from the covering up of the eye. We will return to these cases at
+greater length, in order to occupy ourselves now with the fact, that the
+examination above referred to proves the non-existence of strabismus,
+while appearance still allows us to suspect its existence.</p>
+
+<p>This apparent contradiction finds its explanation in the fact that the
+scientific notion of squinting is determined by the direction of the
+visual axes. Strabismus is present when one eye only is directed to the
+fixed point, while the visual line of the other eye deviates from it.</p>
+
+<p>But we cannot see the direction of the visual line, we can only judge of
+it from the position of the cornea. It is exactly that line which joins
+the point fixed with the centre of the fovea centralis. We can determine
+the position of the cornea by a perpendicular line passing through the
+centre of the cornea; this does not coincide with the visual line but
+deviates from it about 5&deg; outwards. In the case of parallel lines of
+vision the corne&aelig; are directed slightly outwards, a position which we
+are accustomed to consider as the normal one. If the angle formed by the
+above-mentioned perpendicular and the visual line is larger than usual,
+<i>i. e.</i> if the corne&aelig; move further outwards than usual, the unusual
+appearance strikes us, and gives us the impression of a divergent
+squint. The enlargement of this angle, which is usually indicated as
+Angle a, is a peculiarity of the hypermetropic eye; and where we have an
+apparent divergent squint we may expect to find also hypermetropia,
+while an apparent convergent squint occurs occasionally in myopia of
+high degree.</p>
+
+<p>If we turn now to those cases in which a real deviation of the visual
+line occurs, we must first consider the cause, and afterwards
+distinguish it from paralysis of the ocular muscles. The faulty position
+may be constantly present or it may only occur when the paralysed muscle
+is called into action. It is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span> almost invariably combined with double
+vision; sometimes the latter is the prevailing symptom, whilst the
+faulty position of the eye is in no way obtrusive, and can only be
+proved by careful investigation.</p>
+
+<p>In contrast to paralysis of the ocular muscles stands the typical
+concomitant squint, in which the squinting eye normally accompanies the
+movements of the other. Transitional forms may thus be brought about, in
+some of which the paralysis recovers, with complete or almost complete
+restoration of movement, but with continuance of the squint. On the
+other hand, in concomitant strabismus, restriction of movement towards
+the opposite side not unfrequently develops itself.</p>
+
+<p>This impairment of movement has its origin generally in a want of use.
+Those who squint have less need for movement, since one of their eyes is
+already directed obliquely. In divergent strabismus this is apparent,
+but in convergent strabismus the squinting eye governs the field of
+vision on the side to which it turns. When the fixing eye is turned
+towards the side of the squinting eye in convergent strabismus, the
+latter, it is true, makes a concomitant movement, which does not,
+however, bring it by a long way to the limit of the movement of which it
+is capable. The defect of motion is therefore generally present in both
+eyes, and is usually most marked in the squinting eye. Often, indeed,
+there is present at the same time a congenital or acquired insufficiency
+of the antagonistic muscle, but that want of use has also much to do
+with it, is shown by the improvement of mobility that often follows even
+short practice.</p>
+
+<p>From the law of equal innervation, which governs the movements of the
+eyes, it follows that the fixing eye lapses into the associated
+deviation as soon as the squinting eye is directed straight forwards.
+If, for example, a convergent squinting eye is put into fixation, an
+innervation of the external rectus, with which just as strong an
+associated contraction of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span> internal rectus of the other eye, is
+called forth; the direction of the squint then, as well as the degree of
+deviation, is transferred from one eye to the other. It is naturally the
+same with divergent squint.</p>
+
+<p>Squinting upwards or downwards seldom occurs as a symptom by itself;
+more frequently it is associated with convergent or divergent squint.</p>
+
+<p>According to the law of associated movements, when an eye squinting
+upwards is put into fixation, the other eye should make a movement
+downwards, as normally both eyes move together up and down, yet this is
+not always the case. For example, when an upward deviation is present in
+convergent squint, it not uncommonly follows that the secondary
+deviation of the eye which usually fixes is also inwards and upwards;
+only exceptionally in cases of deviation in height of the squinting eye
+does the sympathetic movement take place without change of height.
+Sometimes with deviation of height, I found combined a distinct rotation
+of the eye, generally thus, that together with the movement upwards was
+combined a rotation of the vertical meridian outwards and <i>vice vers&acirc;</i>;
+in fixing the eye a rolling inwards was combined with the movement
+downwards. The other eye then usually showed a similar rotation (thus
+the meridian of both eyes rotated simultaneously to the right or left),
+but the deviation in height was not always the same.</p>
+
+<p>The law of equal innervation requires in alternate fixation, first with
+one eye, then with the other, that the same degree of deviation be
+transferred to the non-fixing eye. When exceptions appear, and the
+deviation in the two eyes is unequal, it is (provided the inequality has
+not been caused by attempted operation, or is the result of paralysis),
+usually to be explained by the fact, that an accommodative movement
+takes place when we are expecting an associated one. For example, if
+there is convergent squint and hypermetropia in both eyes,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span> but more
+hypermetropia in one than the other, in alternate fixation it will be
+found that the least hypermetropic eye always undergoes the greatest
+deviation, because in fixation with the more hypermetropic eye a
+stronger effort of accommodation unites itself with a corresponding
+innervation of the internal rectus, which is transferred equally to the
+other and non-fixing eye. Thus it happens frequently in divergent
+strabismus, when one eye is myopic, the other emmetropic. If the latter
+fixes an object stationed near the "far point" of the myopic eye, the
+internal recti and the accommodation act simultaneously; on the other
+hand if the myopic eye fixes, it wants no accommodation and the
+emmetropic eye sinks into divergence.</p>
+
+<p>With regard to the immutability of the squint; it must not be understood
+that the squint angle always remains the same with the same individual;
+in most cases the amount of deviation varies, the squint is now less,
+now greater; it is desirable however, to know the bounds within which it
+fluctuates.</p>
+
+<p>To determine the degree of the squint one can either ascertain the angle
+of the squint, or use v. Graefe's so-called linear measure of deviation.</p>
+
+<p>The squint angle is that angle, which the visual line of the squinting
+eye encloses with the direction it ought normally to take&mdash;it may be
+measured with the aid of a perimeter. The patient's head is so placed by
+means of a chin rest, that the axis of the squinting eye is in the
+centre of the arc of the perimeter; a distant point in the centre of the
+field of vision is fixed. Behind the patient is a candle, the reflection
+of which is thrown into the squinting eye by means of a plane mirror;
+now slide the mirror along the arc of the perimeter, till the reflection
+on the cornea stands in the centre of the pupil of the eye which is
+under observation. The point which the mirror occupies on the arc of the
+perimeter, indicates the squint angle. In deviation in height of the
+squinting eye,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span> bring the arc of the perimeter into the corresponding
+direction and so measure at the same time the degree of deviation in
+height. Were the method more exact than it is, one would be able to
+measure the angle formed by the visual line and the axis of the cornea.</p>
+
+<p>To find the linear measure of the deviation, cover the fixing eye and
+allow the squinting eye to fix. Hold a millimetre measure close to the
+under lid, so that a chosen portion of it stands under the centre of the
+pupil; uncover the other eye and when the squinting eye returns to its
+deviation, it can be seen over which point the centre of the pupil
+stands, and the linear measure of the deviation is thus obtained. The
+secondary deviation of the other eye is measured of course in the same
+way. If, in consequence of amblyopia, the squinting eye possesses no
+certain fixation, the measure may be so held that the <i>nil</i> point of the
+division coincides with the lower punctum, and then in unchanged
+fixation the portion lying under the centre of the pupil is determined,
+first in the sound and then in the squinting eye.</p>
+
+<p>The execution of one or other of these forms of measurement is in every
+case to be recommended, and if their exactness is not as perfect as can
+be desired, still, on the other hand it should be remembered, that for
+surgical treatment, an exact measurement of the deviation does not
+possess the importance sometimes assigned to it, as in most cases the
+squint angle shows considerable variations.</p>
+
+<p>In a large number of cases these variations are so great, that a correct
+position of the eyes alternates with a more or less considerable squint,
+which as the case may be, appears seldom or often, sometimes only under
+certain conditions, and sometimes quite unexpectedly (periodic squint).
+In some cases stationary or permanent squint begins with the periodic
+form, however, one must not conclude that periodic squint is invariably
+the precursor of the permanent form. In by far<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span> the greater number of
+cases periodic squint continues unchanged without ever becoming
+permanent.</p>
+
+<p>The transition from squint to the normal condition is formed by those
+cases, in which the proper position of the eyes is maintained by a
+desire for binocular single vision, while the elastic tensions of the
+muscles are such, that squinting sets in as soon as binocular single
+vision is rendered impossible (latent squint).</p>
+
+<p>The squint is generally one sided (monolateral), for the eyes in this
+case are usually of unequal value, and the best is always preferred for
+use. The eye which has the acuter vision is always made use of when
+something has to be carefully observed. But when the acuteness of vision
+is equal, and one eye is emmetropic and the other hypermetropic, or if
+both are hypermetropic but in varying degree, the most hypermetropic eye
+is always the squinting one; for with a greater power of accommodation
+it does not accomplish more than the emmetropic or less hypermetropic
+one with slighter expenditure of strength. Why should a man strain his
+accommodation when no advantage is thereby gained?</p>
+
+<p>In most cases the squinting eye has also an available power of vision
+and is on that account used for fixing objects which lie in the
+direction of its visual axis; it can also be made to fix objects in
+front, this occurs as soon as the other eye is covered; it remains as
+the fixing eye till the next blinking of the lids, or movement to
+another object for fixation, or till both eyes are closed for a short
+time, when it returns to its former deviation.</p>
+
+<p>A true alternating strabismus, <i>i. e.</i> alternate use of first one eye
+and then the other to fix objects straight ahead, only occurs when both
+eyes are of equal value as regards weakness and acuteness of vision, or
+when one is more conveniently used for near, and the other for distant
+vision. In these circumstances one eye is always short-sighted and is
+used<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span> for near objects, while the other is emmetropic (or in less degree
+near-sighted or long-sighted) and is preferred for distant things. The
+reason for the alternation lies in the necessity for the act of vision
+itself; it begins regularly whenever distant and near objects are
+alternately fixed. Alternating squint is usually divergent, with short
+sight on one side, still convergent strabismus may occur under these
+conditions.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span></p>
+<h2>CONVERGENT SQUINT</h2>
+
+
+<p>To Donders belongs the merit of having pointed out the presence of
+hypermetropia in about two thirds of all cases of convergent strabismus.
+The fact is undeniable, the theories built upon it are doubtful. Donders
+declares no other conclusion to be possible, than this, that the
+hypermetropia is the cause of the squint. "To see clearly, the
+hypermetrope must accommodate vigorously for each distance. In looking
+even at distant objects he must overcome his hypermetropia by exerting
+his accommodation, and in proportion as the object approaches him, he
+must add to it as much accommodation as the normal emmetropic eye would
+use. The inspection of near objects requires then a special amount of
+exertion. There exists, however, a certain connection between
+accommodation and convergence of the visual lines. The stronger one
+converges the more one has to put into action the accommodation. A
+certain tendency to convergence cannot then be absent during any effort
+of the faculty of accommodation."</p>
+
+<p>Right as these conclusions may appear, and as they really are, as far as
+emmetropia is concerned, they leave out of sight the fact, that the
+connection between accommodation and convergence is an individual and
+acquired one. The weak side of the theory lies in the fact, that that
+relation between accommodation and convergence which is developed in
+emmetropia in consequence of daily practice, is given as being in itself
+normal and the one for all conditions of refraction. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span> relation
+between accommodation and convergence depends on the state of
+refraction, and alters with any of its changes in the course of life. In
+proportion as myopia is gradually developed in originally existing
+emmetropia, myopes learn to converge to the neighbourhood of their far
+point without allowing their accommodation to come into action. With
+hypermetropia it is just the contrary. By far the greater number of
+hypermetropes learn to use their accommodation without difficulty, even
+with parallel lines of vision, for they see distant objects clearly,
+while they neutralise their hypermetropia by accommodation, without
+sacrificing the parallelism of the visual lines.</p>
+
+<p>It is important to notice that Donders' theory makes convergent squint
+appear as almost a necessary consequence of hypermetropia. According to
+Donders, hypermetropes have to choose between the advantages of
+binocular vision with an effort of accommodation corresponding to the
+hypermetropia, and relief to the accommodation by too strong convergence
+with the sacrifice of binocular fixation; and the decision will tend to
+the latter condition, if circumstances exist which deprecate the value
+of binocular vision.</p>
+
+<p>The demand for binocular fusion of the retinal images will be greater if
+both eyes are of equal value; on the contrary it will be less, if the
+retinal image or the visual acuteness of one eye is less perfect than
+that of the other. Varieties of weakness; when one eye always receives a
+clear retinal image, the other an indistinct one; lowering of the visual
+acuteness of one eye by nebul&aelig;, astigmatism or any other cause.
+According to Donders all these furnish a reason why, in existing
+hypermetropia, binocular fixation should be abandoned and convergent
+strabismus developed.</p>
+
+<p>It cannot be denied that the relation existing between convergent
+strabismus and hypermetropia may be as Donders represents it; the only
+question is, whether it really is so. A<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span> theory may appear very
+acceptable, and may rest on a firm physiological basis; it will,
+however, be more perfect if it answers to facts. Physiological
+possibility is not always pathological reality, for other unusual causes
+besides physiological ones acquire value, and so things become
+pathological. If Donders' theory is right, convergent strabismus must
+really begin, as soon as double hypermetropia meets with causes which
+depreciate the value of binocular vision. The theory may be tested then
+by statistics, which confront the cases of hypermetropia and convergent
+strabismus with those cases in which hypermetropia meets with Donders'
+conditions and normal binocular vision still remains.</p>
+
+<p>The statistics, which I have collected, relate to all the cases which
+have appeared in my private practice during the last ten years. The
+number would be much more considerable if I had included the patients of
+the University Clinic; however, the reliability of the single elements
+of which the statistics are composed was to me more important than the
+number. In my private practice I have myself examined every case with
+reference to these statistics for at least five years.</p>
+
+<p>In a large clinic, where more than 5000 new patients annually come under
+treatment, one must frequently content oneself by satisfying the demands
+of the moment; thus the sources of inaccuracy in the statistics would be
+augmented.</p>
+
+<p>Included in the statistics were not merely the cases which came under
+treatment for squint, but all in which squinting was present or those in
+which it could be objectively proved (for example, by scars left by
+previous operations for squint), that squint had formerly existed.</p>
+
+<p>Further, in the following statistics, only those cases were included,
+where an exact determination of the amount of error was possible; in
+most cases this was also verified objectively with the ophthalmoscope.
+In many cases, especially in children, the objective determination of
+refraction alone is possible,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span> and is practicable only with the greatest
+difficulty and by the use of atropine.</p>
+
+<p>Those cases deserve particular mention, in which it remained doubtful
+whether hypermetropia of slight degree or emmetropia was present. Even
+in full visual acuteness it is not unusual that with weak convex glasses
+(of less than a dioptre) binocular vision is just as clear as with the
+naked eyes, while in monocular investigation convex glasses cause a
+slight indistinctness of vision. Are we to recognise hypermetropia here
+or not? Opposed to the objection that in covering one eye the
+hypermetropia is more easily neutralised by accommodation, stands the
+observation that binocular is, as a rule, clearer than monocular vision,
+wherefore, in the usual method for testing the sight, unless special
+precautions are taken, full binocular visual acuteness does not prove
+the presence of absolutely distinct retinal images. These doubts arise
+much oftener in lowered visual acuteness. All conclusions which we
+derive from visual acuteness become very inexact as soon as it is
+lowered. In such cases, in determining anomalies of refraction we are
+accustomed to consider the strongest convex&mdash;relatively, the weakest
+concave glass, with which the visual acuteness individually present is
+reached, as the most correct expression of the hypermetropia or myopia,
+and with good reason if it is a case of ordering spectacles, as all
+sources of error in the method of examination are then avoided as far as
+possible; but it is quite another question if in such cases an exact
+measurement of the amount of error is required solely for diagnostic
+purposes; investigation with the ophthalmoscope is then alone decisive
+and furnishes proof at the same time of how unreliable the determination
+of the error by testing the vision is, in cases of short sight. One can
+realise this most readily in cases of myopia with congenital amblyopia;
+one gets frequently with the most exact correction possible of the
+objectively determined myopia no better visual<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span> acuteness than with a
+very imperfect one. In one case, for instance, which I have repeatedly
+examined in the course of years, the degree of myopia determinable by
+means of the ophthalmoscope amounted to at least 6&middot;5 D., while the
+weakest concave glass with which the full visual acuteness of 5/24 was
+attainable was 2&middot;5 D. Under these circumstances, if one relies merely on
+the trial of vision, the degree of myopia appears too small, that of the
+hypermetropia, on the contrary, just as much too great.</p>
+
+<p>But even the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction has its limits of
+error. It is a question of determining the conditions under which the
+image of the fundus of the eye still appears distinct. We will except
+those circumstances which prevent our obtaining a clear erect image of
+the fundus of the eye, as, for example, high degrees of astigmatism,
+nebul&aelig;, &amp;c.&mdash;even under normal circumstances the fundus of the eye does
+not always present such sharply-defined lines, that one could form a
+perfectly safe opinion from the clearness of the image.</p>
+
+<p>When we call the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction objective, we
+only mean to say that we count the subjective opinion of the patient to
+be of less value, than that of the physician who examines him. The
+determination of the glass even, with which we believe we are able
+distinctly to see the fundus of the eye, is also an objective one.
+Whoever, for instance, is firmly convinced that convergent strabismus
+depends on hypermetropia, will, in doubtful cases, very easily carry his
+subjective conviction into the objective examination, and will still see
+clearly the fundus of even an emmetropic eye with a weak convex
+glass&mdash;the objective signs for the clearness of the image have no
+absolutely defined limits. But apart from this, other sources of error
+are possible. A person using the ophthalmoscope, for instance, who,
+without knowing it&mdash;and such a thing may happen&mdash;possesses a slight
+degree of latent hypermetropia, will find his own hypermetropia
+everywhere,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span> just also as a myope, who deceives himself slightly about
+the degree of his myopia in the calculation of the ophthalmoscopic
+diagnosis of refraction, lays rather too high a value on his own myopia.</p>
+
+<p>Finally it must be added, that if the ophthalmoscopic estimation of
+refraction is to be exact, mydriasis by atropine is required, when, as
+is known, even emmetropic eyes may show a slight degree of
+hypermetropia. Enough, we must not over-rate the value of the objective
+determination of the error of refraction, and I would estimate the limit
+of error at half a dioptre at least. If the examination is rendered more
+difficult, as is frequently the case with children, by a restless and
+impatient demeanour of the patient, even the objective diagnosis may
+afford very doubtful results; such cases were, of course, excluded from
+the statistics. Moreover, ophthalmoscopic determination of the error in
+convergent strabismus is specially difficult, for one cannot advise the
+patient as to a suitable direction for the eye not under investigation.
+It is generally best to keep the eye not under investigation closed.</p>
+
+<p>In practice it is immaterial whether emmetropia or a minimum degree of
+hypermetropia is present; for statistics essentially devoted to
+theoretical questions it seemed more suitable to unite these cases in a
+separate group.</p>
+
+<p>Accurately taken, the statistics should give the condition of refraction
+at the age at which the squint begins. But, if there is a thankless
+task, it is that of examining the erect image in children from two to
+three years of age. To furnish accurate results this method requires a
+certain tractability on the patient's side, which is never present at
+this age, and not always in adults. A number of the cases surveyed in
+the following table also came under observation long after the squint
+commenced, and in some short-sighted persons in particular, the degree
+of myopia at the time when squinting<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span> began, may have been less than it
+was at the time of the examination.</p>
+
+<p>Further, it seemed to me desirable to keep periodic, separate from
+permanent squint; this, however, could not be accomplished with
+exactness. It may easily happen that children with periodic squint
+always squint just when one sees them, and in those cases which had
+already been operated on when they came to be examined, it was quite
+impossible to determine whether periodic or permanent squint had
+formerly been present. Therefore I have represented separately in each
+particular group the number of those previously operated on.</p>
+
+<p>In the following table the refraction of the fixing eye and the visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye are given. In alternating squint the
+refraction of the emmetropic eye was taken, as determining it for
+insertion in the lower division of the statistics.</p>
+
+<p>A. Convergent squint with myopia:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>1. Slight myopia to M. = 1&middot;75 D.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent squint 11 cases (3 previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases (one with M.
+ 1&middot;25 D. of the fixing, M. 4 D. of the squinting eye;
+ the other with M. 1&middot;25 D. of the fixing, H. 4 D. and
+ V. = 1 of the squinting eye). The examination of
+the visual acuteness of the squinting eye showed:</p></div>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>V. more than 1/7</td><td align='left'>4 cases.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. 1/12 - 1/18</td><td align='left'>1 case.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. 1/24 - 1/36</td><td align='left'>1 case.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. Less than 1/36</td><td align='left'>4 cases (among them one with H. 2 D. in the squinting eye.)</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span></td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. indeterminable</td><td align='left'>1 case.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 2 cases with very slight anisometropia and good vision.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot"><p>2. M. 2 D. to M. 3 D. 11 cases, all permanent (6 cases
+ previously operated on), anisometropia with
+ good vision in both eyes in 2 cases (in both, the
+ less myopic eye squints). V. of the squinting
+ eye more than 1/7 in 6 cases.</p></div>
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>V. 1/12 - 1/18</td><td align='left'>1 case.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>V. 1/24 - 1/36</td><td align='left'>2 cases.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>V. less than 1/36</td><td align='left'>2 cases (one with H = 5 D).</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>3. M. 3&middot;5 D. to 6 D.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 11 cases (one previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases, of which one consisted
+ of alternating squint, while the other possessed
+ in the fixing eye M. 4 D., in the squinting one M. 7&middot;5
+ D. with good vision on both sides.</p></div>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>V. more than 1/7</td><td align='left'>7 cases.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. 1/24</td><td align='left'>1 case.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. 1/36</td><td align='left'>1 case (in fixation with this eye; the visual axis<br />
+ shows a linear deviation of 2 mm. The presence of emmetropia is<br /> detected with the ophthalmoscope).</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>Two cases were excluded from the statistics of vision, one on
+ account of congenital capsular cataract, covering almost the
+ whole pupil area, the other on account of choroiditis of the
+ macula lutea.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 4 cases with good vision,
+ anisometropia in 2 cases.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot"><p>4. M. 6&middot;5 D. and more.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 11 cases, among them 9 with V.
+ more than 1/7, 2 excluded from the statistics, one on
+ account of complication with corneal nebul&aelig;, cataract,
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span>
+ &amp;c., the other possessed in the fixing eye M. 6&middot;5 D.
+ V. = 10/70 and slight nystagmus, in the squinting eye
+ a smaller amount of sight not accurately noted, and
+ strong nystagmus in fixing with this eye.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint in 4 cases with good vision.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot"><p>5. Myopia with nystagmus and congenital amblyopia
+ on both sides, 2 cases (not included in the
+ statistics of vision). Altogether 56 cases, among
+ them 10 with periodic squint.</p></div>
+
+<p>B. Convergent squint in emmetropia, including simple myopic astigmatism, 98 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 81 cases (13 previously operated
+ on). Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in 44 cases. V.
+ less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 6 cases; V. less than 1/12 to
+ V. = 1/36 20 cases; V. less than 1/36 7. Excluded from
+ statistics of vision 4 (3 on account of complications,
+ 1 on account of lack of accurate information).</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Alternating convergent squint with emmetropia
+ in one, myopia in the other eye, 4 cases. The degree
+ of the myopia was 3&middot;75 D., 5 D., 6 D., 12 D.
+ Vision good on both sides.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>c</i>) Periodic squint 13 cases (in 6 of them the
+ refraction was objectively and subjectively determined
+ in mydriasis by atropine). No anisometropia worth
+ mentioning was present in any of these cases. Visual
+ acuteness more than 1/7 9 cases. V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 2. V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; one case with choroiditis
+ excluded.</p></div>
+
+<p>C. Convergent squint with doubtful hypermetropia to H. = 1 D., including simple hypermetropic astigmatism, 38 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 30 cases (5 previously operated on).
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span>
+ Visual acuteness more than 1/7 7 cases. V &lt; 1/7 to
+ V. = 1/12 2. V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 5. V. &lt; 1/36 2 cases.
+ 4 excluded (3 complicated with cataract, one on
+ account of impossibility of a trial of vision).</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 7.
+ V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case.</p></div>
+
+<p>D. Hypermetropia 1 D. to 1&middot;5 D. 37 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 23 (4 cases previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 13, V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3. V. &lt; 1/12
+ to V. = 1/36 3. V. &lt; 1/36 3. One case excluded
+ (choroiditis of the macula lutea).</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 14 cases. V. more than 1/7 12.
+ V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1 case. One excluded on account
+ of choroiditis.</p></div>
+
+<p>E. Hypermetropia 1&middot;5 D. to 2 D. 61 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 41 (3 previously operated on). V.
+ more than 1/7 26 cases. V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3;
+ V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. &lt; 1/36 2; (7 cases excluded,
+ 2 as complicated, 5 on account of the impossibility of
+ testing the vision).</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 20 cases. V. more than 1/7 16; V.
+ &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. &lt; 1/12 to 1/36 1; V. &lt; 1/36 1
+ case.</p></div>
+
+<p>F. Hypermetropia 2 D. to 3 D. 88 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 58 cases. V. more than 1/7 26 cases;
+ V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 5 cases (among them one with V.
+ = 1/12 in both eyes); V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 17; V.
+ &lt; 1/36 4 cases. Six cases excluded as indeterminable.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 30 cases. V. to 1/7 24; V &lt; 1/7 to V.
+ = 1/12 3; V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; V &lt; 1/36 1. One case
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span>
+ excluded as indeterminable.</p></div>
+
+<p>G. Hypermetropia 3 D. to 4&middot;5 D. 54 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 35 cases (9 previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 18 cases; V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case;
+ V. &lt; 1/12 to 1/36 9; 7 cases excluded.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 19 cases. V. more than 1/7 14; V.
+ &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1; V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. &lt; 1/36
+ 1 case.</p></div>
+
+<p>H. H. 5 D. and more, 16 cases.</p>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 9; V. to 1/7 3; V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 3; V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36 2; V. &lt; 1/36 1 case.</p></div>
+<div class="blockquot2"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 7; V. to 1/7 4; V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3
+ cases.</p></div>
+
+<h4><i>Table of Refraction and Acuity of Vision in Convergent Strabismus.</i></h4>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>Convergent strabismus.</td><td align='left'> Permanent</td><td align='left'> V. to 1/7.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/7 to V 1/12.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/12 to V. 1/36.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/36.</td><td align='left'> Excluded.</td><td align='left'>Periodic.</td><td align='left'> V. to 1/7.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/7 to V. 1/12.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/12. to V. 1/36.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/36.</td><td align='left'> Excluded.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Myopia</td><td align='left'> 44</td><td align='left'> 26</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Emmetropia</td><td align='left'> 85</td><td align='left'> 48</td><td align='left'> 6</td><td align='left'> 20</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 13</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 1</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H ? to H. 1 D.</td><td align='left'> 30</td><td align='left'> 17</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 8</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H. 1 D. to H. 1&middot;5 D.</td><td align='left'> 23</td><td align='left'> 13</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 14</td><td align='left'> 12</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 1</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H. 1&middot;5 D. to H. 2 D.</td><td align='left'> 41</td><td align='left'> 26</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 20</td><td align='left'> 16</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H. 2 D. to H. 3 D.</td><td align='left'> 58</td><td align='left'> 26</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> 17</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 6</td><td align='left'> 30</td><td align='left'> 24</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 1</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H. 3 D. to H. 4&middot;5 D.</td><td align='left'> 35</td><td align='left'> 18</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 19</td><td align='left'> 14</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>H. 5 D. and more</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>325</td><td align='left'>177</td><td align='left'> 25</td><td align='left'> 63</td><td align='left'> 26</td><td align='left'> 34</td><td align='left'>121</td><td align='left'> 96</td><td align='left'> 12</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 3</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>According to this the percentage of the hypermetropia (including
+doubtful cases) amounts to 66 per cent. Dr. Isler in his dissertation,
+'The Dependence of Strabismus on Refraction,' gives the percentage of
+hypermetropia in convergent squint as 88 per cent.&mdash;a great difference,
+which can, however, be partly accounted for. Isler found in
+hypermetropia of 2 to 10 dioptres squinting in 75 per cent.; in my
+statistics H. 1&middot;5 D. to the highest degrees of hypermetropia are
+likewise represented by 75 per cent. As the difference between H. 2 D.
+and H. 1&middot;5 D. amounts to only half a dioptre, the results of the
+statistics agree perfectly within these limits; the difference lies only
+in the slighter degrees of hypermetropia, for the diagnosis of which
+refer to pp. 12 to 14.</p>
+
+<p>The influence of hypermetropia is very apparent in the percentage of
+periodic squint. While in myopia, emmetropia, and slight hypermetropia,
+the sum total of permanent as compared to periodic squint is as 100:
+19&middot;5, this number mounts in hypermetropia of 1 D. to H. = 3 D. to 52&middot;5
+and in the higher degrees to 59 per cent. Despite the small number of
+cases it is probably no mere accident that in the highest degrees (of H.
+= 5 D. and more) this percentage is calculated at 77&middot;7.</p>
+
+<p>But just this undoubted favouring of periodic squint by hypermetropia,
+helps to show that this condition is one of the causes of squint, but
+not the only one, for in periodic squint just those conditions are
+wanting which induce a permanent deviation.</p>
+
+<p>It is further proved by the table that in convergent strabismus, myopia
+appears just about as frequently as the higher degrees of hypermetropia
+(of 3 dioptres and more). The fact that these are not so strongly
+represented in convergent strabismus, as one would have expected
+according to his theory, had also struck Donders. "This cannot be
+wondered at," he continues, "the power of accommodation, even with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span>
+increased convergence, does not here suffice to produce clear images.
+One gains much better ideas by practice from imperfect retinal images
+than by correcting, as far as possible, the retinal images by a maximum
+of accommodation." I can concede neither to the facts on which the
+theory is based nor to the theoretical structure itself.</p>
+
+<p>An additional statistic which I drew up of the cases of hypermetropia
+which occurred during one year in my private practice, showed that the
+higher degrees are rare in the same proportion as cases of convergent
+strabismus are, with the corresponding degrees of hypermetropia.
+Further, however, I maintain that as a rule, at the age when squint
+usually begins, the accommodation really suffices to overcome even high
+degrees of hypermetropia. In all cases where we find full acuity of
+vision without correction of extreme hypermetropia&mdash;and this is
+frequently the case in young persons who do not squint&mdash;we may assume
+that the accommodation perfectly suffices to produce clear retinal
+images, without excessive convergence. In full acuity of vision even
+high degrees of hypermetropia are no trouble to children. Asthenopia,
+which occurs in children in connection with hypermetropia, is nearly
+always accompanied by defective vision. Were the increased demand on the
+accommodation really the cause of convergent strabismus, asthenopia
+would be far more common than it is among hypermetropic children who do
+not squint.</p>
+
+<p>One can assert, with far greater right, that a sufficient ground for
+squint is not given by slight degrees of hypermetropia, for the latter
+are accommodatively overcome and binocular fixation retained by youthful
+persons without any difficulty, even when the additional motives
+enumerated by Donders are present. I have endeavoured to obtain a
+foundation for the depreciating influence of these circumstances
+favorable to squint, for I counted in my private practice, at the same
+time with the cases of squint, those cases also in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span> which, despite those
+conditions which lessen the value of binocular vision, squinting was not
+present. Taking notice then of those cases in which the hypermetropia of
+the better or less hypermetropic eye amounted to at least 1&middot;5 D., in
+order to allow the influence of the hypermetropia to be more
+conspicuous. The patients from which the above-cited 219 cases of
+convergent strabismus with a hypermetropia of at least 1&middot;5 D. are drawn,
+comprised also 117 cases in which, with the same degree of hypermetropia
+and simultaneous difference of refraction or monocular amblyopia, no
+convergent squint was present; of these cases 101 had acuity of vision
+to 1/7; less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 7, and V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36 9
+cases. The percentage 219: 117 = 100: 53, which is yielded for the
+middle and higher degrees of hypermetropia, is not exactly convincing
+for the accommodative theory of squint; it would be placed still less
+favorably if we were to include the lowest degrees of hypermetropia in
+the statistics.</p>
+
+<p>In face of these facts I do not consider it a happy question, that of
+seeking after "reasons for the prevention of squint." We do not want to
+quarrel with Donders over the question why all hypermetropes do not
+squint. Here, of course, I quite agree with Ulrich that squint does not
+occur if the necessary muscular conditions are absent. The identity of
+the fields of vision, on the other hand, seems to me to be of no
+importance for the age at which squint usually commences. This identity
+presupposes the habit of binocular fusion; but convergent squint arises,
+as a rule, before this habit is acquired. But even if binocular fusion
+were already learnt, it is given up with astonishing rapidity by
+children as soon as squint develops itself (see Case 16). The fixed
+habit of binocular fusion and the identity of the fields of vision
+dependent on it, is contracted only when squint does not occur,
+notwithstanding the presence of conditions favorable to it.</p>
+
+<p>However, the number of cases is so considerable in which,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span> despite the
+presence of the causative motives suggested by Donders, no convergent
+strabismus is present, that the co-operation of other causes is
+necessary for the production of squint, and the first thing we do is to
+think of those causes which lead to squint even without hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p>The attempt has really been made to attribute the commencement of
+convergent strabismus to the accommodation even in emmetropia, and
+offers fresh proof how easily facts are overwhelmed by theories. Donders
+originally gave it as his opinion, that loss of power or paresis of the
+accommodation produces strabismus just as little as the decrease in the
+amount of accommodation which comes with increase of years; a year
+later, because he could not agree with Donders' theory, Javal declared
+the principal cause to be due to weakening of the accommodation and not
+the refraction, but without producing any other ground for the assertion
+than that of his own good pleasure. Afterwards, Donders sought to
+explain the occurrence of convergent strabismus in emmetropia by paresis
+of accommodation, which must indeed, according to his theory, produce
+the same result as hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p>I content myself by reminding my readers, that at the age when
+convergent strabismus usually arises, between the second and third year
+of life, a determination of the near point is utterly impossible; a
+foundation in fact is therefore wanting to the theory. But, further, if
+paresis of accommodation really had the significance assigned to it,
+atropine, which is so frequently used in the ophthalmic treatment of
+children, would be followed by convergent strabismus. This is still more
+the case with diphtheritic paralysis of accommodation, which is present
+more frequently than we are aware of, for it is only a trouble to
+children in the schoolroom, in younger children it passes through its
+natural uninterrupted course of recovery unobserved, in hypermetropia as
+well as in emmetropia. If the accommodation were really of great
+importance in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span> occurrence of squint, convergent strabismus would
+frequently be an after symptom of diphtheria, which, as is known, is not
+the case. The few cases of squint which I have seen after diphtheria,
+had their origin in paresis of the external rectus, which was proved by
+the objective defect in movement, as well as by the disappearance of the
+squint, with the recovery of the paralysis of the abducens.</p>
+
+<p>That the accommodation can play a part, is shown by the rarity of
+periodic accommodative squint, but for the great majority we must seek
+the chief cause of squint in emmetropia and myopia, in elastic
+preponderance of the internal recti and insufficiency of the externi,
+and it is apparent that the same causes will also be influential in
+hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p>In hypermetropia, if one causes fixation at about 30 cm. and then covers
+the eye with the hand, it frequently deviates inwards. Donders infers
+from this, that most hypermetropes prefer to sacrifice comfortable and
+clear vision in order to retain binocular vision. Now, it is easy to
+convince oneself that youthful hypermetropes see distinctly even without
+correction of their hypermetropia, and we may assume that they see
+comfortably if they do not complain of asthenopia; but that is by no
+means always the case, for the appearance of asthenopia is conditional
+on the relation of the degree of the hypermetropia to the amount of the
+accommodation, which, apart from a few other causes, depends chiefly on
+the age of the patient.</p>
+
+<p>Just as we refer the deviation outwards of the covered eye to
+insufficiency of the interni or preponderance of the externi, we may
+conclude an inward deviation of the covered eye to be due to
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni, and this
+all the more, as in hypermetropia the covered eye very frequently
+remains in fixation, and falls away exceptionally into relative
+divergence.</p>
+
+<p>Just as in myopia even in the lesser degrees, insufficiency of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span> the
+interni or preponderance of the externi is not rare, so in hypermetropia
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni appears to
+be frequent; and if this disturbance of the muscular balance be followed
+even in myopia or emmetropia by convergent strabismus, this will of
+course happen still more easily if at the same time hypermetropia, or
+even without hypermetropia, the remaining favouring conditions mentioned
+by Donders are present. Of course I do not deny the effect of the
+hypermetropia and of those other favouring conditions, but only wish to
+draw attention to the fact with reference to them, that as a rule they
+do not of themselves suffice to produce convergent strabismus.</p>
+
+<p>Nebul&aelig; have always been regarded as one of the causes of squint; here I
+quite agree with Donders that they may operate, firstly, as general
+causes of weak sight; secondly, through this, that the irritated
+condition, combined with the keratitis, may produce a spasmodic,
+afterwards a trophic shortening of the muscles; but this seldom happens.</p>
+
+<p>Whether nebul&aelig; are found rarely or often in squint, depends in great
+measure on the statistic materials which are worked out. In my
+statistics they do not occur in any quantity worth mentioning, because
+in private practice purulent ophthalmia keratitis, and in short, the
+whole army of external inflammations of the eye is much rarer, than in
+that portion of the populace which fills public clinics. Further, it is
+to be observed that the mere occurrence of nebul&aelig; in squint proves
+nothing&mdash;even squinting eyes may develop keratitis. We must at least
+require to be assured that the squint began after the keratitis.</p>
+
+<p>Among the causes which promote the occurrence of squint, Donders
+mentions also conditions which diminish convergence. We have ascribed a
+very important <i>r&ocirc;le</i> to the muscles, and have only to occupy ourselves
+here with the relation between the visual line and the axis of the
+cornea, which we have already mentioned on page 2. Donders has measured
+the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span> angle <i>a</i> in ten cases of hypermetropia with convergent strabismus,
+and from the comparison with hypermetropic non-squinting eyes draws the
+conclusion, that in similar degrees of hypermetropia a higher amount of
+<i>a</i> specially disposes to strabismus. I will not repeat here the witty
+deduction by which Donders seeks to point out that a higher value of a
+must be followed by insufficiency of the externi and preponderance of
+the interni; the concession is enough that these circumstances exist and
+are the cause of the squint.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span></p>
+<h2>PERIODIC CONVERGENT SQUINT.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The opinion is prevalent that convergent strabismus usually begins in
+the form of periodic squint, and that a permanent deviation is developed
+in this way only. In many cases it may be so; on the other hand I have
+sometimes seen convergent strabismus arise suddenly, without a
+preliminary stage of periodic squint. This question, however, is of no
+special interest. It is more important to note that periodic squint
+frequently continues to exist unchanged, without ever becoming
+permanent.</p>
+
+<p>Like the whole doctrine of strabismus, opinions on periodic squint have
+been governed by Donders' theory, regardless of facts, but as the
+accommodation frequently exercises a perceptible influence, it is
+judicious to consider first of all the cases in which this does not
+happen.</p>
+
+<p>Convergent squint in myopia begins as a rule with periodic squint, and
+may continue to exist in this form: some patients who would not be
+operated upon have been under my observation for years; sometimes a
+correct position was retained for a long time, and sometimes strong
+convergent squint was present, proving that accommodation had nothing
+whatever to do with it. In myopia of higher degree the accommodation is
+scarcely used&mdash;unless concave glasses are worn; still periodic squint
+occurs under these circumstances. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 1.</span> Miss B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 22, possesses in both eyes myopia of 6&middot;5 D. with
+full visual acuteness and without posterior staphyloma. A concave
+eyeglass of 4&middot;5 D. is used off and on for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span> distance, and the eyes have
+never been over-exerted in looking at near objects. For a long time
+tendency to convergent squint, which is combined with diplopia, has
+existed on the left side. The eyes generally have a perfectly normal
+position, but occasionally convergent squint occurs, remains in
+existence a few hours, perhaps for a whole day even, and disappears
+again. The deviation here amounts to 4 or 5 mm. As the patient did not
+wish for an operation, I have been able to observe the condition for
+years without any change in it or without the squint becoming permanent.
+The cause of periodic squint is certainly not to be sought for here, in
+the accommodation.</p>
+
+<p>Many cases of convergent strabismus with myopia constantly offer such a
+peculiar phase of the defect, that one has accepted the statements which
+ascribe to short-sightedness a determining influence on this form of
+squint, without asking for further proof. It may, therefore, be useful
+for our purpose to cite a few cases of periodic convergent strabismus
+with emmetropia. For instance:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 2.</span> Louise S&mdash;, &aelig;t. 6-1/2, came under treatment for follicular
+conjunctivitis, convergent strabismus appearing simultaneously on the
+right side; the investigation showed the acuity of vision of left eye =
+5/12, right V. = 5/36, the ophthalmoscope, and also mydriasis by
+atropine, proved the presence of emmetropia. The squint had first been
+observed when the child was about two years old, then it disappeared
+spontaneously and returned again three or four months ago.</p>
+
+<p>In the course of treatment, which extended over about six months, the
+child came repeatedly into my consulting room, sometimes with squint,
+sometimes without, in the periods during which correct fixation existed,
+no squint occurred even when working. Examination with the stereoscope
+showed no normal binocular fusion even during normal position of the
+eyes.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 3.</span> Vera von K&mdash;, &aelig;t. 6; tendency to convergent strabismus, mostly
+on right side, has existed one and a half years. Normal position as a
+rule, on covering the eye immediate convergence, with a deviation of 5
+mm.; with additional aid of a red glass and weak prisms deviating in a
+vertical direction, homonymous diplopia is very easily provoked. Visual
+acuteness on both sides 5/12, the left slightly better than the right;
+emmetropia in mydriasis by atropine. A year later a repeated examination
+gave the same result.</p>
+
+<p>The cause of periodic squint in these cases can only be sought in the
+bearing of the ocular muscles; an elastic preponderance of the interni
+existed, which ceased, as a rule, on using the externi. A special
+influence of the accommodation was not traceable, which does not of
+course prevent this from acting differently in other cases. But in
+periodic squint it may frequently be observed that the deviation
+commences under influences which have nothing to do with the
+accommodation, but, on the contrary, under those which weaken the
+muscular energy generally, for example, fatigue, anxiety, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>Like convergent squint generally, the periodic form is also more
+frequent in hypermetropia than in emmetropia or myopia, and we admit
+that in hypermetropia the strain on the accommodation has more influence
+in producing the deviation. But as the appearance of periodic squint in
+emmetropia or myopia is proved without participation of the
+accommodation, solely on the ground of the muscular forces&mdash;so the
+presence of the same forces in hypermetropia ought not to be ignored.</p>
+
+<p>It happens, indeed, that in considerable degrees of hypermetropia a
+slight convergent deviation occurs only from time to time, the cause of
+which, on closer investigation, can only be sought in the ocular
+muscles. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 4.</span> Paul F&mdash;, was first introduced to me in 1872 as a child of three
+years and two months, with a tendency to convergent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span> strabismus on the
+right side of two months' standing, which was sometimes greater,
+sometimes less, and sometimes was not present at all. In 1877 I saw him
+again suffering from conjunctivitis, without perceiving any squint; no
+examination respecting it was made. In 1880 his elder brother came under
+treatment for apparent myopia, which with the ophthalmoscope proved to
+be hypermetropia, and my attention, being again drawn to the eyes of the
+family, I requested the younger brother to come for examination. At
+first sight the position of the eyes appeared to be quite normal, on
+more careful inspection slight convergent squint of the right eye showed
+itself occasionally. On both sides apparent emmetropia or very slight
+hypermetropia, acuity of vision on left side 5/9, on the right 5/18,
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction was impossible on account of
+restless fixation.</p>
+
+<p>With the addition of a red glass diplopia cannot be produced, the left
+field of vision is observed in the stereoscope, then the right one on
+covering the left eye; never both together. In mydriasis by atropine
+hypermetropia of high degree (about 4 dioptres) is ophthalmoscopically
+detected on both sides, with convex 4&middot;5 D., V. = 5/9 with slight
+convergent deviation of the right eye.</p>
+
+<p>What has here prevented the transition to permanent squint with a
+deviation corresponding to the great strain on the accommodation? That
+the accommodation was really in action is proved simply by the apparent
+emmetropia and the school-work, that no retention of binocular single
+vision took place is shown by the proved incapacity for binocular fusion
+of the retinal images. Nothing then remains but to accept the fact that
+in the ocular muscles inducement was only given for a slight periodic
+squint, not for a permanent one answering to the amount of accommodation
+used.</p>
+
+<p>As further proof that periodic squint may occur even in hypermetropia
+quite independently of the accommodation, I<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span> should like to cite a case
+of intermittent convergent strabismus which a number of other oculists
+have seen besides myself.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 5.</span> Sophie S&mdash;, &aelig;t. 7-3/4, has suffered for two years from a strong
+convergent squint on the left side, occurring every other day. The
+deviation amounts to 7 mm. (the same deviation is transferred to the
+left eye, when the right is put into fixation). On the intervening days
+the position of the eyes is quite normal, on covering one only a slight
+deviation takes place. The visual acuteness amounts to 5/12 on the left,
+5/24 on the right, ophthalmoscopically with atropine hypermetropia of
+two dioptres. Quinine has been given without avail, a convex glass of 2
+D. also, which has been worn for the last half year, has not affected
+the deviation.</p>
+
+<p>Diplopia was not present&mdash;on the intervening days free from squint, with
+the aid of a red glass, homonymous diplopia could be detected without
+perceptible deviation, still it was impossible to bring about a union of
+the double images by prisms. In the stereoscope the left field of vision
+was first inspected, then both, still fusion of the fields of vision was
+not traceable. The statements, moreover, as indeed could not be expected
+otherwise in a child of such tender age, were not free from
+contradictions, but the existence of normal binocular vision was very
+doubtful. I therefore performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus,
+after which normal position continued to exist on the following squint
+days. After three quarters of a year I saw the child again; the squint
+was perfectly cured, even on looking down, convergence was no longer
+present. Whether a permanent cure was thus obtained, seems to me
+doubtful, owing to the rare peculiarities of this case.</p>
+
+<p>Mannhardt also describes a similar case of intermittent squint; that of
+a girl aged eight years, in whom periodic convergent strabismus had
+begun four years previously, and for two years had occurred regularly
+every other day. On undecided<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span> vision the eyes were normally placed, but
+as soon as a near or distant object was fixed, a considerable deviation
+inwards of the left eye occurred. Under the covering hand both eyes
+deviated inwards equally. On the non-squinting days strabismus could in
+no way be produced even by fixation of the nearest objects, only under
+the covering hand a deviation inwards ensued. The squint could not be
+removed by quinine, but only by correction of the hypermetropia of 3 D.
+In any case, then, hypermetropia was one of the causes of the squint,
+but not the only one, as it cannot operate on alternate days only.</p>
+
+<p>Javal, who tries to make this case coincide with his theory, accepting
+an intermitting paresis of accommodation as the cause of squint, is
+manifestly in error, as Mannhardt particularly mentions that acuity of
+vision, refraction and accommodation remained perfectly equal on both
+days.</p>
+
+<p>If it is thus proved, that also in periodic inward squint the deviation
+may occur quite independently of the accommodation, on the other hand it
+is apparent, that if once a tendency to squint exists, a
+disproportionately strong convergence may very easily unite itself with
+the accommodation. Particularly of course in hypermetropes, who are able
+to fix nothing without using their accommodation, a remarkable
+fluctuation of the squint angle very frequently takes place. Sometimes
+the deviation is exceedingly strong, sometimes so slight that it seems
+to be absent. It is usually impossible to determine if it is really
+absent, for as soon as we single out a point for fixation to make the
+investigation feasible, strong deviation sets in. If in such cases we
+perfectly atropise both eyes, restore the attainable acuity of vision by
+neutralisation of the hypermetropia with convex glasses, and yet,
+nevertheless, as is generally the case, the customary strong convergence
+takes place on fixation of a distant object, there can be no talk of a
+strain on the accommodation; at most we can say, that the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span> impulse for
+accommodation, habitually united with the intention to see distinctly,
+and the too strong convergence combined with it, also takes place,
+though by paralysis of the accommodation the participation of the same
+has become impossible. As accommodative squint those cases are chiefly
+indicated in which the deviation only takes place when there is a claim
+on the accommodation. In most cases of this kind hypermetropia is
+present. I have occasionally seen periodic accommodative squint with
+emmetropia of the fixing eye.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 6</span> may serve as an example: H. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 15, shows a considerable and
+very varying periodic inward squint. Sometimes correct position is
+present, sometimes strong deviation, indeed the latter only occurs on
+looking at distant objects, while for near ones correct position of the
+eyes generally takes place. The examination showed for the right eye
+hypermetropia 1&middot;5, for the left myopia 3&middot;5 D.; full acuity of vision on
+both sides. The squint occurring in the left eye on looking at distant
+objects was therefore accommodative; the effort of the accommodation
+necessary for correcting the hypermetropia united itself to an
+excessively strong innervation of the interni, as the interests of
+binocular vision came but slightly into consideration on account of the
+myopia in the left eye. For near objects the myopic eye is used without
+accommodation and therefore also without convergent strabismus of the
+right. But if one caused a point about 25 cm. distant to be fixed first
+with the right (hypermetropic) eye while the left was covered and then
+caused fixation to be transferred to the left, the accommodative
+convergent strabismus induced was alternately transferred to the left
+eye and continued, although the left eye fixed without any effort of the
+accommodation on account of its myopia. Double tenotomy of the interni
+and correction of the hypermetropia effected the cure of the squint.</p>
+
+<p>The clearest cases of accommodative strabismus are those in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span> which
+usually a correct position and sometimes even binocular fusion is
+present, while squint occurs only during the strain on the accommodation
+necessary for distinct vision.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 7. Miss Bertha v. Pr&mdash;, &aelig;t. 27, shows strong accommodative squint
+of the right eye, said to have been observed by her parents when she was
+fifteen months old. Correct position of the eyes is generally present
+with indistinct vision; the endeavours to see clearly immediately causes
+striking convergence of the right eye. On the left hypermetropia 3&middot;5 D.,
+vision normal; on the right the same degree of hypermetropia, vision not
+more than 1/12 of the normal, no ophthalmoscopic report. On correction
+of the hypermetropia and with aid of a red glass crossed diplopia
+immediately appears, which is corrected by a prism of 5&deg; base inwards;
+prisms of 12&deg; with the bases inwards are overcome on fixation of an
+object about 12 ft. distant by divergence. The elastic tension of the
+ocular muscles necessitates then a preponderance of the externi, and an
+effort of the accommodation necessary to overcome the hypermetropia,
+which on account of the congenital amblyopia of the right eye unites
+itself with excessive convergence. Had the elastic tension of the ocular
+muscles made a preponderance of the interni a condition, permanent
+convergent squint would have been the result, and one would have called
+the weak sight of the right eye amblyopia from want of use.</p>
+
+<p>Typical accommodative squint occurs quite independently of the will on
+each effort of the accommodation, and is not combined with diplopia. It
+is otherwise in those cases of hypermetropia of high degree in which
+patients voluntarily call forth convergent squint, and retain it for a
+short time for the purpose of distinct vision. They are then perfectly
+conscious of the squint, and perceive also as a rule the double images
+which occur at the same time; I have seen such cases in adults who could
+only produce the accommodation necessary for distinct vision by the aid
+of a too strong convergence; they,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span> however, only now and then made use
+of this help. Although differing much from the typical form, these cases
+of voluntary accommodative squint were also included in the statistics.</p>
+
+<p>In involuntary periodic (even if not accommodative) squint, the patient
+as a rule is not conscious of the occurrence of the false position; that
+exceptions to this occur Case 1 has given us an instance.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span></p>
+<h2>CONVERGENT SQUINT IN MYOPIA.</h2>
+
+
+<p>For the &aelig;tiology of convergent strabismus it is of interest to ascertain
+the age at which it is developed, and one of the first results we obtain
+is the exceptional position which the union of myopia with convergent
+strabismus takes in this category. Of the 56 cases contained in the
+above statistics I possess reliable information of the time of
+commencement in 11 cases; the squint was twice observed before the
+fourth year of life, once between four and ten years of age, eight times
+between the tenth and thirty-third years of life.</p>
+
+<p>I must first state prominently with regard to the connection of myopia
+with convergent squint that I see no reason for holding short sight to
+be the cause of the squint, as v. Graefe does.</p>
+
+<p>A specially severe strain of the eyes, as v. Graefe assumes, was not
+traceable in the cases observed by me. Excessive convergence and strain
+on the accommodation is often enough present in weak sight, for example,
+in astigmatism without the existence of squint; were short sight in
+general an inducement to convergent squint these cases would appear much
+oftener than they actually do, owing to the frequency of myopia. In my
+opinion the cause of their rarity lies in the fact that myopia is
+frequently combined with insufficiency of the interni and preponderance
+of the externi, but only rarely with the reverse condition of the
+muscles. If, however, a preponderance of the interni develops itself
+together with the myopia, convergent strabismus is easily produced, for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>
+without correction of the myopia by spectacles, the desire for retaining
+binocular single vision for everything beyond the far point is lessened
+by the indistinctness of the retinal images. Within the range of their
+field of distinct vision these squinting myopes frequently retain
+binocular vision, while the capacity for accepting parallel rays or
+retaining them for long, is lost.</p>
+
+<p>Strictly speaking, the periodic squint present in these cases is of a
+peculiar kind, for the binocular single vision present within range of
+the convergence excludes the notion of squint; the latter only occurs
+when an object lying outside the point of convergence is fixed.
+Moreover, according to the common use of language, I have only used the
+expression periodic convergent squint for the change between a parallel
+direction of the visual axes and pathological convergence.</p>
+
+<p>As squint in myopia usually commences at an age when binocular fusion
+has already become a fixed habit, diplopia regularly takes place with
+it, but patients become more easily accustomed to this than in paralysis
+of the ocular muscles, because the retinal images are indistinct and the
+double images in the field of vision always keep at about the same
+distance, while in paralysis of the ocular muscles the distance is
+constantly changing.</p>
+
+<p>The myopia, in these cases, is not the cause of the squint, but only a
+favouring circumstance. If the same preponderance of the interni is
+developed at the same age in emmetropia, squint is not so easily caused,
+as the distinct retinal images present in the whole field of vision
+render it easy to retain binocular single vision. Therefore we see the
+same form of squint arise less often in emmetropia (see Case 45) when
+childhood is past, than in myopia. As a rule preponderance of the
+interni in hypermetropia leads eventually to convergent squint even in
+childhood.</p>
+
+<p>In emmetropia and hypermetropia convergent strabismus seldom arises
+after the tenth year (paresis of the abducens of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span> course excepted),
+therefore in my investigations as to the time of commencement of typical
+squint I have only considered those patients who came under my treatment
+before their tenth year. We must rely for the most part on the vague
+statements of the parents, which lose in exactness in proportion as the
+origin of the squint is of distant date; moreover, I have myself seen a
+great many of the children before they were four years old. In this way
+I have collected reliable information respecting the origin of the
+squint in 193 cases, and of these (<i>a</i>) 88 cases occurred in children
+one to three years old, (<i>b</i>) 53 in children three to four years old,
+(<i>c</i>) 35 cases in children of over four years of age. It is thus at once
+seen that in the great majority of cases, convergent strabismus
+commences in children under four years of age, who have not yet begun to
+read and write, and have no inducement to use their accommodation
+severely, and still less continuously.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span></p>
+<h2>SQUINT FROM PARALYSIS OF THE ABDUCENS.</h2>
+
+
+<p>Convergent squint as a result of paralysis of the abducens is not very
+often seen. It is first to be observed that a convergent squint,
+including the whole field of vision, occurs by no means in all cases; in
+about half the cases binocular fusion is retained towards the healthy
+side, diplopia then only occurs when the weak abducens is exerted beyond
+its strength. In those cases in which convergent squint is present in
+the whole field of vision paralysis of the abducens cannot be the sole
+cause, but some other cause than the most apparent one must co-operate.
+An insufficiency of the externi of previous existence, or an elastic
+preponderence of the interni may be considered. I have not been able to
+persuade myself of the fact that hypermetropia can play any part
+therein.</p>
+
+<p>In by far the greater number of cases paralytic convergent squint
+recovers together with the paralysis of the abducens, the field of
+single vision transfers itself gradually from the healthy side to the
+side of the weak abducens, and at length governs the whole field of
+vision. In proportion as the muscle again fulfils its normal functions,
+the habit of binocular fixation regains its power, and it seldom happens
+that the elastic tension of the muscles has so changed during paralysis
+that the desire for binocular single vision does not suffice to overcome
+it. Case 48 furnishes an example of the fact that although the squint
+occurred as a consequence of paralysis of the abducens, it certainly
+remained in existence after healing of the paralysis on account of
+previously existing insufficiency of the externi.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Congenital paralysis of the abducens seems more frequently to have
+convergent squint as a result. If, for example, convergent squint is
+observed in the first year of life, and we find a complete defect of
+motion on the part of one abducens when the children become old enough
+to be examined, we may certainly assume that the case is one of
+congenital paralysis of this muscle, or at least that the paralysis
+originated soon after birth. Doubtless, however, cases appear, of
+congenital paralysis of the abducens without squint, and as these cases
+are so rare I will describe two which I observed in adults.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 8. Miss H&mdash;, &aelig;t. 17, has nominally since her birth a considerable
+defect in the outward movement of the left eye. On looking to the left
+homonymous diplopia is present, on looking to the front and the right
+binocular single vision and no squint; on both sides emmetropia and full
+acuity of vision.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 9. Mr. V. W&mdash;, &aelig;t. 24, has likewise congenital paralysis of the
+left abducens. No squint, but as soon as the left eye is used for
+fixation in the left direction there occurs in the right one a strong
+secondary movement inwards.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span></p>
+<h2>HYSTERICAL SQUINT.</h2>
+
+
+<p>In the hysterical form we see rather a rare variety of convergent
+squint, which is conditional on contraction of the interni through
+restriction of movement of the externi. Hysterical symptoms may at the
+same time appear in the eyes or elsewhere, still this does not always
+happen. As these cases are rare I will relate a few of those I have
+observed. (These cases are not included in the above statistics.)</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 10. Anna R&mdash;, &aelig;t. 20, came under treatment in February, 1878,
+stating that on the previous day she perceived blindness of the right
+eye on waking; in the afternoon she felt particularly weary, and after
+she had slept about an hour woke with blindness in both eyes. No
+perception of light, good pupillary reaction, ophthalmoscopic report
+normal. Patient was treated with copious enemata and dismissed on the
+fifth day cured.</p>
+
+<p>In February, 1880, she again came under treatment with blindness of both
+eyes, also perceived the previous day on waking. Convergent strabismus
+was present at the same time, of such a degree that the eyes converged
+to a point 10 to 20 cm. distant. The outward movement was suspended in
+both eyes. The attempt to turn the eye outwards is accompanied by short
+convulsive movements, and followed by an immediate rebound to the
+convergent position. She asserts her inability to see the movements of a
+hand before her eyes, is able, however, to move about in a strange room,
+unsteadily certainly, but with avoidance of obstacles; she sits down on
+a chair indicated to her, &amp;c. The position of the eyes proves that there
+was no simulation<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span> in all this; it would be impossible for any person to
+simulate a strong convergent squint continuously for four to five days.
+Eight days after her admission the patient was dismissed with normal
+movement of the eyes and good vision.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 11. Miss Antonie E&mdash;, &aelig;t. 15, who has been treated by her family
+physician for various hysterical disturbances, suffered since the middle
+of December, 1879, from convergent strabismus with permanent but very
+varying deviation, which is at times very slight, and sometimes amounted
+to more than 7 mm. The movement outwards is in both eyes rendered
+difficult, still the outer edge of the cornea is brought to the outer
+angle of the lids with trouble and twitching movements. Homonymous
+double images are present, their mutual distance is alike in the whole
+field of vision, but is (six or eight weeks after the commencement of
+the squint) signified as being slight; at the same time a difference in
+height is present, the image of the left eye stands lower, prism 30&deg;,
+base outwards, places the images just above one another. Nystagmus
+occasionally occurs in monocular fixation (with exclusion of the other
+eye). In due course a gradual improvement set in, the deviation and the
+distance apart of the double images became slighter, the outward
+movement better, and in the middle of April, 1880, four months after the
+trouble began, no squint and no diplopia were present, the outward
+movement normal, facultative divergence = 0.</p>
+
+<p>The hysterical character of the visual disturbance showed itself when
+the vision was tested. I will first observe that repeated investigations
+with atropine showed emmetropia, while in the first investigation on the
+left side, No. 36 at 5 m. was not recognised with the naked eye, but
+only with weak concave glasses (with - &middot;5 D. V. = 5/18). With the right
+eye No. 0&middot;8 was read fluently, from 0&middot;75 she asserted she was unable to
+recognise a word, with - 2 D. V. = 5/36. It would be wrong to conclude
+from this myopia or<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span> spasm of the accommodation, for here, as in most
+cases of hysterical weak sight, it could be shown that whatever glass
+one chose to hold before the patient's eyes, was followed by an
+improvement in the statements. The same improvement in visual acuteness
+was repeatedly obtained in this case by a weak prism (3&deg;), held before
+the fixing eye during monocular examination, and in the end, V. 5/12 was
+obtained for the right eye, as against 5/6 with a prism of 3&deg;.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, on May 1st, full visual acuteness was present on both sides.
+Field of vision and sense of colour normal.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case</span> 12. Mrs. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 30, previously treated for various hysterical
+disturbances, has complained for about eight days of disordered vision,
+the binocular nature of which was proved as patient had herself observed
+that on closing one eye she could at once see clearly. Near objects to
+15 cm. are seen distinctly. With all this, at the first examination it
+was impossible to produce diplopia, either with the aid of a red glass
+or prisms, &amp;c., the images of first one eye, then the other were always
+seen by turns. A few days later, on repeating the examination, double
+images were perceived, they were homonymous with slight difference in
+height (image of the right eye lower), the lateral displacement is
+corrected by a prism of 28&deg;. Micropsia of one image was also perceived.
+On both sides the outward movement is rather difficult. Full visual
+acuity on both sides&mdash;in the first examination slight myopia - &middot;75 D. is
+specified, afterwards emmetropia. The visual disturbance was removed by
+goggles with faintly ground glass on the right side&mdash;preparations of
+iron, bromide salts, shampooing with cold water and electricity were
+used. In six weeks' time binocular single vision was again restored; the
+facultative divergence = 0. With red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms homonymous diplopia corrected by prism 3&deg;. Field of vision and
+sense of colour remained normal throughout.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span></p>
+<h2>DIVERGENT SQUINT.</h2>
+
+
+<p>If we want to draw a comparison between convergent and divergent squint,
+we must consider only absolute divergent strabismus, for convergent
+strabismus does not offer a parallel to relative divergent squint. In
+absolute divergent squint the direction of the visual axes is such that
+they would meet behind the patient's head; in the relative divergent
+squint the axes of vision are parallel or slightly convergent, but they
+do not cross at the point fixed by the one eye, but at a greater
+distance off.</p>
+
+<p>If we then only compare that which admits of comparison, we first find
+out that divergent squint is rarer than the convergent form, and the
+cause contained in the ocular muscles is here brought to light still
+more clearly than there.</p>
+
+<p>We must next distinguish between permanent and periodic squint, and we
+see the latter so frequently continue as such, that we must not consider
+the transition from this variety to the permanent one to be the rule.</p>
+
+<p>In 183 cases of absolute divergent strabismus which appeared in my
+private practice in the same space of time as the cases of convergent
+squint above discussed I have been able to obtain exact determinations
+of the refraction and visual acuteness. The weakness of the fixing eye
+was the test for classing them among the statistics, and in patients who
+had been long under observation, the first certain determination of
+refraction, which was necessary, as several children are included who
+came<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span> under treatment with divergent strabismus and emmetropia whilst
+myopia developed itself later.</p>
+
+<p>A. Divergent squint with hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 4 cases. Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than
+1/7 1 case, V. less than 1/36 1 case, 2 excluded, one on account of
+complication with detachment of retina, the other on account of
+impossibility of testing vision.</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 5 cases. Among them 3 with double hypermetropia, 2
+with emmetropia in one, and hypermetropia in the other eye. Visual
+acuteness of more than 1/7 in 3 cases; V. = 1/9 1 case; V. = 1/36 1
+case.</p></div>
+
+
+<p>B. Divergent squint in emmetropia.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 32 cases. Among them 10 with alternating strabismus and
+anisometropia of at least 2 D. And in 9 cases emmetropia in one, myopia
+in the other eye; once simple hypermetropic astigmatism in one, with
+myopic astigmatism in the other eye. Visual acuteness of both eyes in
+these 10 cases more than 1/7. In the 22 cases of monocular squint the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye amounted 8 times to more than 1/7
+-, 10 times 1/12 to 1/36 (in 1 case V. = 1/36 with nystagmus of the
+squinting eye when put into fixation). V. less than 1/36 in 3 cases; 6
+cases excluded on account of complications.</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 28 cases. Among them 5 with anisometropia of at
+least 2 D. (emmetropia in one, myopia in the other eye). Visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 27 cases, less than 1/7
+to V. = 1/12 in 1 case.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span></p></div>
+
+
+<p>C. Divergent squint in myopia to M. = 2 D.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 24 cases (among them 6 with anisometropia of at least 2
+D.). Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 15 cases. V.
+less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. less than 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. less
+than 1/36 2 cases; 2 cases excluded on account of complications (one on
+account of atrophy of the optic nerve, the other on account of posterior
+polar cataract).</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic squint 23 cases. Among them 10 cases with anisometropia
+of at least 2 D. Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in all 23 cases.</p></div>
+
+
+<p>D. Divergent squint in myopia 2 D. to M. = 4 D.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 17 cases. Among them 2 with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. to 1/7 9 cases. V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case. V. &lt; 1/12 to V. =
+1/36 2 cases. V. &lt; 1/36 1 case. Four cases excluded (2 with choroiditis,
+1 with congenital cataract, 1 with traumatic cataract).</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 8 cases. Among them 4 with anisometropia of at least 2 D.
+V. to 1/7 7 cases. V. 1/36 1 case.</p></div>
+
+
+<p>E. Divergent squint in myopia 4 D. to M. 6&middot;5 D.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 10 cases. V. more than 1/7 in 5; V. less than 1/36 in 3
+cases, 2 excluded (one on account of large anterior synechia, one on
+account of choroiditis of the macula lutea).</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 9 cases. Among them one with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. more than 1/7 5 cases. V. = 1/9 1 case; 3 cases excluded on
+account of complications.</p></div>
+
+
+<p>F. Divergent squint in myopia more than 6&middot;5 D.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Permanent 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 4 cases, 4 excluded on account
+of choroiditis of the macula lutea.</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) Periodic 10 cases. V. to 1/7 9 cases; V. = 1/12 in one case.</p></div>
+
+
+<h4><i>Table of Refraction and Visual Acuteness in Divergent Squint.</i></h4>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'> Permanent.</td><td align='left'>V. to 1/7.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/36.</td><td align='left'>Excluded.</td><td align='left'>Periodic.</td><td align='left'>V. to 1/7.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/7 to V. = 1/12.</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/12 to V. = 1/36.</td><td align='left'> V. &lt; 1/36.</td><td align='left'> Excluded.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Hypermetropia</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Emmetropia</td><td align='left'> 37</td><td align='left'> 18</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 6</td><td align='left'> 28</td><td align='left'> 27</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Myopia to M. 2 D.</td><td align='left'> 24</td><td align='left'> 15</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 23</td><td align='left'> 23</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>M. 2 D. to 4 D.</td><td align='left'> 17</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 8</td><td align='left'> 7</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>M. 4 D. to 6&middot;5 D.</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> 5</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 3</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>M. more than 6&middot;5 D.</td><td align='left'> 8</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> 9</td><td align='left'> 1</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>100</td><td align='left'> 52</td><td align='left'> 3</td><td align='left'> 15</td><td align='left'> 10</td><td align='left'> 20</td><td align='left'> 83</td><td align='left'> 74</td><td align='left'> 4</td><td align='left'> 2</td><td align='left'> &mdash;</td><td align='left'> 3</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<p>It follows then from this, that periodic absolute divergent squint is
+just about as frequent as the permanent form and that both become more
+rare as the degrees of myopia increase. As, however, in spite of this,
+myopia is present in about 60 per cent. of all cases, the connection can
+be no other than this, that myopia frequently unites itself with
+insufficiency of the interni and preponderance of the externi; in this
+respect, as in every other, myopia and hypermetropia are directly
+opposed.</p>
+
+<p>The setting up of a "hypermetropic divergent strabismus," dependent on
+hypermetropia, seems to me only to show how much people have been
+carried away by the idea that the cause of the squint must be given by
+the state of refraction.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span> Isler claims 17 to 29 per cent. of the cases
+for hypermetropic divergent strabismus; of these, however, the half
+possess only slight hypermetropia of 2 D. or less, which perfectly
+agrees with the fact that the same observer has also found in convergent
+squint a remarkably high percentage of the lower degrees of
+hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p>Whether squint originates in the permanent or periodic form depends
+chiefly on whether the movement of convergence is retained or lost.
+There are cases of considerable divergent squint, in which the near
+point of the convergence is scarcely removed, while on the other hand,
+the physiological innervation for convergence may be lost, without
+absolute divergence ever being brought about. In a number of emmetropic
+or slightly myopic cases with absolute preponderance of the externi, the
+physiological connection between accommodation and convergence is
+maintained in a relaxed way; thus, for example, it is impossible to
+converge voluntarily to a large object, as, for instance, a pencil held
+in the vertical line, while accurate convergence immediately follows on
+reading at the same distance; in other cases accommodation can be
+exerted to the near point, without inducing the slightest impulse to
+convergence. This circumstance is worthy of consideration for the
+prognosis of the operation. A mere relaxing of the tie between
+accommodation and convergence may be strengthened by practice, but if
+the impulse to innervation is completely lost, it will scarcely be
+possible to restore it again; as after complete laying aside of absolute
+divergence the relative form still continues to exist.</p>
+
+<p>Those cases deserve special consideration in which emmetropia is present
+in one eye, in the other myopia. Slight degrees of one-sided myopia
+reconcile themselves with the continuance of a normal binocular act of
+vision. If the far point of the myopic eye lies at an inconvenient
+proximity even<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span> for reading, then, as a rule, the emmetropic eye is used
+for near as well as distant objects; if, on the contrary, the degree of
+myopia answers to a range of vision convenient for working, and visual
+acuteness is normal, then the temptation to use the emmetropic eye only
+for distance and the myopic one only for near objects is so
+overpowering, and the advantages on the other hand which would be
+offered by clinging to binocular vision so slight, that a convenient
+monocular vision is generally preferred. Even for objects which lie
+nearer the eye than the far point of the myopic, and at the same time
+farther than the near point of the emmetropic eye, for which, therefore,
+both eyes could secure clear retinal images, binocular vision is not
+used. In cases in which the patient can read with proper binocular
+fixation, if one covers all but one line and then makes with prisms
+double images standing one above another, it is the myopic eye alone
+which almost invariably shows a clear retinal image.</p>
+
+<p>The usual result of this is, first a relaxing of binocular vision, and
+as together with this the motive for convergence, namely, the effort of
+the accommodation ceases, the conditions for the commencement of
+divergence are produced. Still the elastic tension of the ocular muscles
+decides even here; if the interni preponderate, convergent squint
+results, when the myopic eye is used for near objects, the emmetropic
+for distant ones. If the externi preponderate, then permanent or
+periodic divergent strabismus is caused. Nevertheless, in a remarkable
+minority of cases the elastic tension of the ocular muscles is so
+regulated that, despite relaxation of binocular fusion, neither
+convergent squint nor absolute divergence occurs, but simple relative
+divergence remains with employment of the myopic eye for near objects.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span></p>
+<h2>DYNAMIC SQUINT, INSUFFICIENCY OF THE INTERNI AND MUSCULAR ASTHENOPIA.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The habit of binocular single vision, when it has once reached its
+normal development, governs the movements of our eyes to a great degree;
+the desire to avoid double images makes itself continually felt; and
+where this is not possible, an uncomfortable feeling of uncertainty
+arises at every movement of the body. Double images are prevented as far
+as possible by movements of the eyes, which we must designate as
+voluntary when we are conscious of their occurrence.</p>
+
+<p>If we follow a moving object with the eyes, the latter make
+corresponding movements in order to keep the image in the centre of both
+retin&aelig;. For example, if we look at a distant object which approaches in
+the direction of one visual axis, this eye will necessarily remain
+still, while the other will be put into convergence in proportion as the
+object advances. If this did not happen, if this eye remained also
+immovable, the retinal image would deviate outwards more and more from
+the macula lutea and diplopia would arise. In order then to avoid
+diplopia the macula lutea moves to where the retinal image is formed. We
+can, however, move the images on the retina by the aid of prisms without
+movement of the object. If, for example, we hold a prism before the eye
+so that the base lies towards the temporal side, the retinal image will
+be displaced towards the base of the prism, outwards then from the
+macula, and double images will<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span> occur, which are at once removed by a
+distinctly perceptible inward movement of the eye. In this way, by means
+of a prism applied with the base inwards, outward deviation may be
+produced, and even in a modified way deviations in height of the visual
+axes by means of prisms with the base upwards or downwards. Here the
+force of habit is apparent, for in the daily use of our eyes we
+continually practise the inward movement of the visual axes; we can also
+easily restore the customary degree of convergence by means of prisms
+with the bases outwards; physiologically indeed, it is quite immaterial
+whether an object is in a proximity to our eyes attainable by
+convergence, which causes double images until it is binocularly fixed,
+or whether by the aid of prisms we bring the retinal images of a distant
+object to parts of the retin&aelig; which do not correspond. If we look at a
+distant object fixed with parallel visual axes, under normal
+circumstances, prisms of 6&deg; to 8&deg; with the base inwards can be overcome,
+that is to say, as in weak prisms the deviation is equal to about half
+of the prism, an absolute divergence of the visual axes of 3&deg; to 4&deg; may
+be produced by which the double images are blended. It is immaterial
+whether we apply a prism of, say 8&deg; to one eye, or prisms of 4&deg; with the
+bases inwards to both. The facultative divergence thus attainable
+remains the same, which speaks for the fact, that this monolateral
+movement attainable by prisms is also combined with double innervation;
+and of course in the eye remaining in unmoved fixation, with impulses to
+innervation which are reciprocally abolished.</p>
+
+<p>In the physiological use of our eyes we certainly never have occasion to
+practise absolute divergence, but we constantly practise the transition
+from the inward to the outward movement of the eyes, and experiments
+with prisms teach us, that the innervation of the externi therewith
+connected may even be carried somewhat beyond the physiological<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span> limits
+of parallelism. Moreover, the extent of the "facultative" divergence
+attainable by prisms shows a considerable latitude.</p>
+
+<p>The case is similar with deviation in height of the visual axes. In
+looking upwards or downwards the innervation of both eyes is usually
+precisely the same, but on looking at any point when holding the head
+obliquely, the difference in height of the eyes then present must be
+balanced by a corresponding difference in the direction of the visual
+axes. The same thing happens, if we hold a vertically deviating prism in
+front of one eye in binocular vision; prisms of 2&deg; to 3&deg; may then be
+overcome by difference in height of the eyes; rarely is a much greater
+difference in height of the visual axes attainable. I have seen this
+particularly in those cases where facultative divergence also was
+greater than usual.</p>
+
+<p>It happens especially in myopia that prisms of considerably more than 6&deg;
+to 8&deg; are overcome by divergence, and certainly without causing any
+inconvenience. Among the cases presented for examination, those, of
+course, are most numerous where the patients have some complaint to
+make, even if this have quite a different cause. In any case a divergent
+position of the axes of vision corresponds to the balance of the
+muscles, and this does not generally occur, for this reason, because
+retaining binocular single vision necessitates a parallel or convergent
+position of the eyes. Frequently, however, even a slight impediment to
+binocular fusion, such as the application of a red glass to one eye,
+suffices to procure preponderance in the elastic tensions of the
+muscles, and to cause the fixed point to appear double. We can put a
+stop to binocular single vision still more surely by applying to one eye
+a prism with the base upwards or downwards. If the double images of a
+point 4 to 5 meters distant show a crossed lateral position besides the
+difference in height<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span> caused by the prism, we may assume that an
+absolute divergent position of the eyes corresponds to the elastic
+tension of the muscles; and the measure of the deviation will be given
+by those prisms which, placed with the bases inwards before one or both
+eyes, bring the double images perpendicularly over one another. As a
+rule, in these cases the degree of divergence which occurs on cessation
+of binocular single vision, is almost as great as the facultative
+divergence, which may be reached in the interest of binocular single
+vision.</p>
+
+<p>V. Graefe designates as "dynamic squint" that condition in which the
+position of divergence corresponding to the state of tension of the
+muscles does not occur because binocular vision is retained. Without
+clearly defined limits these conditions pass on into periodic squint,
+when either diplopia occurs together with the divergence, or the habit
+of binocular fusion becomes less frequent or is quite forgotten, while,
+however, according to the varying state of the muscles sometimes normal
+position, sometimes divergence, is present. A correct position of the
+eyes is quite possible even without binocular fusion, then only the
+regulator is wanting, which, in the varying play of the muscular forces,
+ensures the balance of position and movement.</p>
+
+<p>The older ophthalmologists had a parallel strabismus and probably
+understood by that, what we now designate as relative divergence. The
+connection between relative divergence and myopia, pointed out by
+Donders, is universally admitted; on the other hand, in more modern
+literature we scarcely find any intimation of the fact that a parallel
+squint occurs, which is quite independent of myopia, and rests solely on
+the fact that the impulse of innervation for convergence is lost. A few
+examples may explain this condition.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 13.</span>&mdash;Auguste T&mdash;, &aelig;t. 28. On the left emmetropia, V. 12/20. On the
+right the visual acuteness is variously given,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span> but certainly does not
+amount to more than 1/5 nor less than 1/10 of the normal.
+Ophthalmoscopic report normal. The left eye is naturally the fixing one,
+the right always remains parallel&mdash;for near objects double images are
+present. A convergent movement is not attained, either for near objects,
+or by means of prisms with bases outwards for distant ones. Prisms with
+the bases inwards are not overcome; with vertically deviating prisms the
+double images of distant objects stand perpendicularly above one
+another.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 14.</span>&mdash;Ludwig v. K&mdash;, &aelig;t 32, has complained of diplopia repeatedly
+for fifteen years. Statement in August, 1877: Convergence to a pencil
+held before patient on the median line is only retained to about 50 cm.,
+nearer, crossed diplopia occurs. In reading, binocular fixation is
+possible with an effort at a nearer point. The facultative divergence
+does not amount to more than 3&deg;; even by convergence to a distance of 4
+mtr. prisms of 3&deg; only are overcome. Emmetropia and full visual acuity
+on both sides. In Sept., 1880, three years after, the statement remained
+unaltered. Patient has only used the prismatic spectacles then
+prescribed off and on, as the symptoms are sometimes more troublesome,
+sometimes less so, and he exerts his eyes but little on the whole.</p>
+
+<p>A restriction of movement of the internal recti did not exist in these
+cases; the absence of the convergent movement is not then to be set down
+to the interni not possessing the proper power for acting, but only to
+the fact that the impulse for their simultaneous innervation was
+wanting. We frequently find this absence of innervation in divergent
+squint, and then generally consider it to be a consequence of the
+squint, which, however, as the above cases show, need not necessarily be
+the case. If preponderance of the externi is at the same time present,
+absolute divergence is the result, but not always permanent squint,
+frequently only the periodic form. The anomaly of innervation may also
+usually be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span> proved in such cases, in that after the removal by operation
+of the absolute divergence it continues to exist in the relative form;
+it can indeed happen that for a few days after the operation convergent
+squint is present for distance, together with relative divergence for
+near objects.</p>
+
+<p>The highest phases of this anomaly, as represented in Cases 13 and 14,
+are seldom seen. Slighter degrees, which, like so many other things, are
+usually designated as "insufficiency of the interni," are more
+frequently met with and are combined with asthenopia. On the one hand,
+in looking at near objects a tendency exists to the formation of double
+images, which are removed by the action of the interni; on the other
+hand, however, the habit of binocular single vision is relinquished on
+account of the frequent diplopia. In all forms of squint we see that
+binocular fusion is forgotten; still it seems more natural to assume
+this to be the result, and not the cause of the squint, as Krenchel
+does.</p>
+
+<p>Another form of relative divergence is that which is brought about in
+consequence of extreme myopia. The change in form of the myopic eye
+diminishes its mobility, associated movements of the eyes may be
+replaced by turning the head, but this is not possible for the movement
+of convergence. Further, in extreme myopia the far point is generally
+used for reading, &amp;c., and sometimes even a somewhat greater distance,
+because on account of the close proximity of the objects the retinal
+images are so large that they are sufficiently clearly recognised even
+if they are not quite distinct. At all events accommodation certainly
+does not take place, hence one motive favouring convergence is removed.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, however, such considerable convergence as clear vision demands
+in high degrees of myopia, would be difficult even for a normally
+movable eye. Reasons enough therefore exist for giving up binocular
+fixation and using only the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span> more convenient eye for reading, without
+effort to the accommodation and convergence. In myopia of high degree
+patients almost always read with relative divergence, and these myopes
+do just what we must advise them to do, they avoid strain of the
+accommodation and convergence of the visual axes and thus keep well.</p>
+
+<p>Notwithstanding that this condition necessarily results from the nature
+of extreme myopia, it is frequently held to be pathological, which it
+certainly is not in itself. At most, the short-sightedness and change in
+form of the eye are pathological; the relative divergence on the other
+hand is simply a harmless result of the above conditions.</p>
+
+<p>No doubts whatever exist about this relative divergence. The theory that
+the demands on the working eye must be very much increased is quite
+unfounded. If any harmful influence were to be feared for the fixing
+eye, one would observe the same in convergent squint, when, as a rule,
+one eye only is used for fixation even after operation.</p>
+
+<p>In convergent strabismus, however, no one, at least no ophthalmologist,
+thinks of entertaining such fears for the eye used in fixation, and
+where is the physiological basis of this whole idea to be found? Is the
+visual purple more active in monocular than in binocular vision, or what
+physiological activity is thereby taxed in increased degree?</p>
+
+<p>I have found no confirmation of Alfred Graefe's theory that in myopia
+the eye chiefly used in fixation is frequently affected with choroiditis
+of the macula lutea, &amp;c., but have only observed that patients to whom
+this happens seek the advice of a physician more eagerly than when the
+same intra-ocular troubles befall the other usually neglected eye in
+connection with myopia.</p>
+
+<p>Muscular asthenopia undoubtedly occurs; it is only a question whether it
+is as frequent as it is diagnosed. It has its foundation in that the
+convergence necessary for reading,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span> writing, &amp;c., can only be sustained
+by an effort of the internal recti, which exceeds their strength, and
+finally results in painful fatigue of the muscles, just as accommodative
+asthenopia depends on painful fatigue of the muscles of accommodation.
+The similarity reaches still further. We occasionally find that despite
+considerable degrees of hypermetropia no asthenopia occurs even in
+persons who strain their eyes; while, on the other hand, asthenopic
+troubles appear in hypermetropia which are not removed by correction of
+the refraction and must consequently have some other motive. Yet still
+more is this the case with those disorders, of which muscular asthenopia
+may be supposed to be the cause. Notwithstanding the existence of a
+considerable preponderance of the externi, muscular asthenopia may be
+entirely absent. If we find, for example, that as soon as we do away
+with binocular single vision absolute divergence occurs even on looking
+at a distant fixed point, and that prisms of 12&deg; to 30&deg; are overcome by
+divergence, we may safely assume that the elastic preponderance of the
+externi must be overcome in reading, &amp;c., in the interest of binocular,
+single vision by a stronger muscular effort of the interni, which is,
+however, very frequently accomplished without fatigue. Asthenopic
+disorders are also frequently present together with preponderance of the
+externi, which continue to exist despite the removal of the same by
+operation, and must consequently have some other cause. The diagnosis of
+accommodative asthenopia is as a rule confirmed <i>ex juvantibus</i>; this
+cannot be asserted for the muscular form.</p>
+
+<p>For example, Case 15.&mdash;Mathilde F&mdash;, &aelig;t. 21, has suffered from
+asthenopic disorders for three years. The investigation at the beginning
+of January, 1880, shows: On the left, myopia 4 D., V. = 5/18, No. 0&middot;3 is
+read at 10 cm.; on the right, myopia 6 D., V. 5/24, 0&middot;3 is read with
+difficulty, cylindrical glasses cause no improvement. Patient converges
+to about 8 cm., on<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span> exclusion absolute divergence of 3 to 4 mm. follows,
+with slight upward deviation of the right eye.</p>
+
+<p>On correction of the myopia the facultative divergence amounts to = 26&deg;.
+Here one might easily have concluded the asthenopia to be a result of
+fatigue of the interni, but this opinion was refuted by the effect of
+the treatment. The double tenotomy of the externi performed on January
+2nd was first followed by convergent squint with homonymous double
+images, which were united by a prism of 12&deg; with the base inwards. In
+the course of a few days single vision was again restored. A fortnight
+after the operation, on correction of the myopia, patient could see
+singly to 3 mtr.: towards both sides homonymous double images were still
+present, and in fixation to 30 cm. relative divergence on exclusion of
+one eye. Six months after the operation, on correction of the myopia and
+application of red glass to one eye, crossed double images occur close
+together, which become homonymous by means of a prism of 3&deg; with the
+base inwards. Patient sees double images always, without being much
+disturbed by them, yet they cannot be united by means of prisms. The
+habit of binocular single vision has also gradually been lost. In
+reading (without correction) a movement of convergence takes place (it
+cannot be determined whether this answers exactly to the distance of the
+object). If, on the other hand, one asks the patient to fix binocularly
+larger objects, such as a pencil close to her, she is unable to do it,
+relative divergence occurs then, as well as on exclusion of one eye. The
+asthenopic disorders remain unchanged and are not removed even by
+prismatic spectacles. Despite all reasons then for the supposition the
+asthenopia was certainly not of a muscular nature.</p>
+
+<p>The uncertainty as to diagnosis is still greater in those cases which,
+according to v. Graefe, were to be designated as dynamic relative
+divergence; cases in which with parallel<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span> visual axes a disturbed
+balance is not present but occurs on convergence in such a way that the
+interni only perform their destined work with difficulty, and are
+nevertheless urged on in the interest of binocular single vision, till
+they give way in painful fatigue.</p>
+
+<p>According to v. Graefe the diagnosis of this condition must be carried
+out in the following way. First of all the convergence must be fixed on
+a near object in the median line; if one eye remains behind in the
+movement it may be accounted for in various ways, for example, the
+impediment of movement caused by the change in form of the eye in myopia
+or the faulty innervation of the interni mentioned on p. 54. In both
+cases for the most part no dynamic, but manifest relative divergence is
+present in viewing near objects. It may also happen that the patient
+does not converge sufficiently, merely because accommodation is absent.
+This experiment does not then prove the presence of dynamic relative
+convergence, and v. Graefe came to the conclusion, therefore, that a
+normal position of the eyes obtained only by the habit of binocular
+single vision must be relinquished so soon as we cause binocular single
+vision to cease. Just as under these circumstances dynamic absolute
+divergence is manifested in the observance of distant objects, so must
+this be the case in dynamic relative divergence in the observance of
+near objects. One eye is first excluded while looking at an object about
+25 cm. distant, to determine whether it still remains in a proper
+position for fixation. We have reason to believe that the position which
+occurs in the excluded eye answers to the given conditions of tension of
+the muscles. Still it is not necessary to cause binocular vision quite
+to cease, it is sufficient and even more advantageous, simply to make
+binocular single vision impossible, which we are able to do by means of
+prisms. If, for example, a point be fixed lying at the usual distance
+for work of 25 to 30 cm., or, according to v. Graefe, a large spot
+intersected<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span> by a vertical line, and one then applies a vertically
+deviating prism to one eye, the influence of binocular single vision on
+the ocular muscles is removed, as the fusion of the double images
+standing above one another is impossible; and nothing prevents the
+assumption of a relative position of divergence instead of a proper
+convergent one; as a result of this the double images show a crossed
+lateral position as well as the difference in height produced by the
+prism. The extent of this lateral deviation may be measured by means of
+prisms, which being applied to the eyes with the bases inwards place the
+double images again perpendicularly above one another. Von Graefe holds
+it to be of importance to determine the strongest prisms which can be
+overcome for the given distance by means of convergence and by the
+outward movement of the eyes.</p>
+
+<p>On the strength of this method of inquiry there is a prevalence of
+opinion that the asthenopic disorders common in myopia are caused by
+over-exertion of the ocular muscles; indeed people believe this so
+strongly that they assume the presence of muscular asthenopia even in
+individuals in whom the habit of working with relative divergence is
+already firmly rooted. Relative divergence may perchance cause annoyance
+through double images, though this really seldom happens, but it can
+never cause muscular asthenopia, for the internal recti muscles protect
+themselves by means of relative divergence from any stronger exertion.</p>
+
+<p>Asthenopic disturbances are certainly frequent in myopia, but the above
+method of inquiry does not at all prove that their cause lies in the
+ocular muscles, for those appearances from which one concludes dynamic
+relative divergence and muscular asthenopia, are found in almost all
+myopes, even when the latter have no asthenopic troubles, for they owe
+their origin to the nature of the myopia. Myopes learn to converge to
+the distance of their far point, without exerting the accommodation; if
+we now cause a point at this distance<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span> to be fixed and then exclude one
+eye, or make binocular fusion impossible by means of vertical prisms,
+what imaginable reason is there for the excluded eye to remain in proper
+fixation? In emmetropia the habitual relation between accommodation and
+convergence will be able to ensure that the excluded eye also remains
+covering the fixed object, convergently as well as accommodatively; in
+myopia, every discretionary relative divergence up to parallelism of the
+lines of vision is perfectly justified, because no effort of the
+accommodation takes place. How in the world can it be held to be
+pathological that a movement of convergence does not occur, when one has
+just artificially removed all those physiological conditions which could
+possibly have brought it about? If one now likes, as v. Graefe proposes,
+to determine the prisms, which can be overcome by means of the outward
+movement, there is no doubt about the fact, that with the aid of prisms
+the lines of vision may be made parallel or even divergent, the retinal
+images indeed, always retaining the same distinctness, in so far as they
+are not injured by the prismatic diffusion of colours. There is just as
+little reason why the convergence usually attainable should not also be
+restored by the aid of prisms with the bases outwards, the retinal
+images are not only impaired by the prisms, but the accommodation united
+with the convergence, no longer corresponds to the real distance of the
+fixed point.</p>
+
+<p>Enough, all these incidents, which are to prove the presence of muscular
+asthenopia in myopia, occur when the investigation is carried out as
+usual in the region of the far point, entirely on a physiological basis,
+and must not therefore be held to be pathological without further proof.</p>
+
+<p>The proof of muscular asthenopia in slight degrees of myopia,
+emmetropia, or hypermetropia, is somewhat more certain; a deviation from
+physiological laws is certainly present, if we find that the
+corresponding convergence does<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span> not unite itself with the accommodation
+for a near object, we must be quite sure that an exact accommodation for
+the fixed point is also really present. It by no means follows because
+one causes a large black spot to be observed at a distance of 25 to 30
+cm., that an exact accommodation takes place; one can see these things
+even with circles of diffusion, the retinal images are already dimmed by
+means of the prisms, and one can easily convince one's self that, on the
+renunciation of clear retinal images, normal eyes can reach every
+attainable convergence or relative divergence by means of prisms.
+Insufficient accommodation and defective convergence are, however,
+easily caused by all painful sensations situated near the eye, which
+make the accommodation uncomfortable and fatiguing. This applies to
+every common head- or tooth-ache, and in the same manner to disturbances
+arising in the conjunctiva, or which depend on the stretching of the
+collective tunics of the eye in myopia, or which allow any other
+so-called "nervous" origin to be suspected.</p>
+
+<p>We must place the same claims to the diagnosis of muscular asthenopia as
+to that of the accommodative form. Just as the latter is only detected
+if convex glasses really give the expected relief, so the proof of
+muscular asthenopia is only furnished when relief to the interni is
+brought about by means of the appropriate remedies. For myopes, who do
+not fall back on the aid of relative divergence, notwithstanding that
+they possess a clear field of vision only attainable with difficulty
+through convergence, it is the simplest plan to remove the far point to
+about 25 to 30 cm. by specially adapted concave glasses. If only slight
+myopia or none at all is present, but the relation between accommodation
+and convergence is disturbed, the latter can be corrected by means of
+prisms with the bases inwards&mdash;to be sure, only in a slight degree, as
+prisms of more than 4&deg; are scarcely suited for spectacles, partly on
+account of their weight and partly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span> on account of the diffusion of
+colours. Prisms may be ground with concave or convex surfaces, according
+to the requirements of refraction or accommodation.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, if an elastic preponderance of the externi can be proved by
+means of considerable facultative divergence, the same may be lessened
+by tenotomy of one or both externi; still after my own experience I
+cannot advise the performance of this operation unless prisms of at
+least 16&deg; are overcome by absolute divergence, for I have seen many
+patients in other practices who have acquired convergent squint and
+diplopia for distance as the sole result of the operation, while the
+asthenopic troubles for near objects continue. The proof that it is not
+a case of muscular asthenopia is sometimes only obtained by the
+operation.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span></p>
+<h2>BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The fact that those who squint do not as a rule have diplopia, while
+squints depending on paralysis of the ocular muscles are combined with
+diplopia, was difficult to explain as long as the view was adhered to of
+identical retinal areas founded on anatomical construction. The first
+explanation hit upon was that a false identity became established, an
+inequality of the retin&aelig;; were this the case diplopia must of necessity
+occur on correction of the squint by tenotomy.</p>
+
+<p>Commencing with the assumption of a congenital identity which led under
+all circumstances to the occurrence of diplopia as soon as the images of
+the same object fell in both eyes upon non-identical points of the
+retin&aelig;, the hypothesis was next advanced that the image of the squinting
+eye was not perceived, that a constant suppression of the sensations in
+the squinting eye took place. Suppression of sense-impressions does take
+place; as soon as our attention is entirely engrossed upon anything, we
+are in a position to disregard the impressions upon all other organs of
+sense; they do not reach our consciousness. That visual sensations are
+easily disregarded may be proved by experiments. Hold a small plane
+mirror obliquely before one eye, with the brim pressed into the angle of
+the nose so that the objects lying at the side and behind are seen in
+the mirror. If the other eye is now used to read with, it is quite easy
+to disregard the objects seen in the mirror provided that our attention
+is not attracted to places by a particularly bright light. No doubt
+those who squint also<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span> possess this physiological power, and it is
+therefore certain that they make use of it under certain circumstances;
+but the suppression theory necessitates that they should constantly and
+always do so, since diplopia is bound to occur directly they do not do
+it.</p>
+
+<p>The absence of double vision is in fact the only evidence that can be
+adduced in favour of the exclusion theory; this negative fact, however,
+proves nothing, and is, moreover, capable of other explanations, as soon
+as one abandons the theory of congenital retinal identity. The
+examination of those who squint demonstrates the untenability of this
+theory. People who squint seldom complain of diplopia, but double images
+can be rendered apparent in a comparatively large proportion of cases,
+usually with the greatest ease, by covering the best eye with a red
+glass and squinting with a vertically deviating prism. Many squinters
+now admit the presence of double images, but their position by no means
+corresponds to the identity theory, their lateral displacement is far
+too slight, or patients find themselves unable to localise the position
+of the image. It sometimes happens that alternating vision with both
+eyes is mistaken for diplopia, the images are then invariably specified
+as homonymous; however, with attention it is easy to distinguish this
+alternating vision from the simultaneous perception of two images of one
+and the same object.</p>
+
+<p>There can be no doubt that in most cases the position of the double
+images does not correspond to the principle of identity, and just as
+little doubt that one to whom double images are easily made apparent
+cannot possess the confirmed habit of always suppressing the image of
+the squinting eye. A certain number of cases remain in which it is
+impossible to produce diplopia; that these, however, do not constantly
+suppress the image of the squinting eye may be proved in the very simple
+way I have indicated. An object of fixation is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span> placed in a darkened
+room, on one side of and behind the squinting eye is placed a small
+flame, the reflection of which, by means of a plane mirror before the
+squinting eye is thrown upon its retina. The reflection of the flame is
+seen on the cornea of the squinting eye, by slight rotation of the glass
+it can be brought into the area of the pupil, and at the same instant
+the patient sees the light, the reflection of which can easily be made
+to coincide with the image of the fixation object seen by the other eye.
+The experiment has then an entirely objective basis, it always succeeds,
+a fact on which I lay special stress, even in eyes whose vision is very
+defective; therefore here also the habit of suppression of the retinal
+images of the squinting eye is not present.</p>
+
+<p>That the squinting eye really possesses its full share of the visual
+field can easily be proved (especially in divergent squint) by the aid
+of a perimeter. The best eye is covered with a red glass, so that the
+objects projected from the fixation point, as well as the excentric
+field of vision of this eye, appear red. As soon as the test object
+moves towards the side of the squinting eye and enters the visual area
+covered by the latter, it appears in its natural white colour, and this
+in most cases before it has reached the centre of the retina of this
+eye.</p>
+
+<p>Another proof that the squinting eye is really used for vision appears
+to me to lie in the fact that persons who squint, provided of course
+that the vision of the eye concerned is not very defective, do not show
+that uncertainty in the estimation of distance, which is apt to prove so
+troublesome to those who have only monocular vision.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/fig1.jpg" width="400" height="260" alt="Fig. 1." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 1.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>If, then, the view of the constant suppression of the retinal images of
+the squinting eye is untenable, how is it to be explained that squint as
+the result of paralysis of the ocular muscles causes diplopia, while
+concomitant squint does not? The answer to this question is clear as
+soon as we abandon the supposition of a congenital retinal identity, and
+look instead upon the relation of the eyes to each other as harmonious;
+identity, or co-ordination as something acquired. Central fixation is
+congenital and depends upon anatomical conditions, for as the macula
+lutea is anatomically the most perfect part of the retina, it is natural
+that the new-born child soon learns to place this part of the retina
+opposite objects which attract its attention, and therefore those
+relations of the eyes to each other are naturally developed. For
+instance, if both eyes (Fig. 1) are directed to the distant point <i>a</i>,
+the image of point <i>b</i>, situated at the same distance, will fall on the
+inner half of the retina of the left eye; the left eye will now learn by
+experience to refer inner retinal images to objects lying to the left of
+the fixation point; at the same time, however, with binocular fixation,
+the right eye learns to seek the images of the temporal half of its
+retina in the left field of vision, and <i>vice vers&acirc;</i>. From this it is
+easy to trace the laws of binocular diplopia. For example, let <i>a</i> in
+Fig. 2 be the fixation point, while at the same time the image of <i>b</i>
+belongs in both eyes to the temporal half of the retina. Now, as we have
+already seen, the right eye has learnt to refer temporal retinal images,
+to objects lying to the left of the fixation point,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span> while for the same
+reasons the left eye projects temporal images to the right. While then
+point <i>a</i> is seen binocularly singly, point <i>b</i> appears double, and
+certainly the image of the right eye is projected to the left of the
+fixation point, and that of the left eye to the right of it, in other
+words, crossed diplopia is present. But the eyes are divergent relative
+to point <i>b</i>; double images then which occur as a result of divergence
+(whether relative or absolute) must appear crossed, and one will easily
+be able to infer that for the same reasons those double images which
+occur in consequence of convergence, must be homonymous. All this,
+however, only with the presupposition, that the habit of binocular
+fixation is already fully developed; any disturbance of the same, in
+whatever way (by prisms, mechanical displacement of the eyes, paralyses
+of the ocular muscles, or by those forms of squint which arise after
+childhood is past) causes the double images to illustrate the law above
+explained. Certainly diplopia may be absent even then, but only in very
+rare instances. Now and then this happens in objectively proved ailments
+of the ocular muscles, where the patients complain of disturbed vision,
+which disappears immediately on the exclusion of one eye (see Case 12),
+a method of relief they usually discover for themselves; thus the
+indistinct vision is seen at once to be a disturbance of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span> binocular
+vision. Many such patients learn to see the double images which formerly
+escaped them, after they have been instructed how to do so during the
+examination. With others, all efforts are in vain, it is impossible to
+render them conscious of the double images, notwithstanding that the
+presence of the binocular disturbance of vision proves that the habit of
+binocular fixation exists. This apparent contradiction is explained, if
+one reflects that the physiological basis of vision rests on a series of
+conclusions. The first thing which strikes us as a result of binocular
+fixation is, that the images of the centres of the retin&aelig; may be
+referred to one and the same region of the room, and this experience
+will be retained, even if the images on the centres of the retin&aelig;
+represent different objects in consequence of paralysis of the ocular
+muscles; the images are notwithstanding referred to one and the same
+part of the room, all objects are thrown together promiscuously, and the
+consequent embarrassment is of course removed directly one eye is shut.
+The experience of those patients whom it is impossible to render
+conscious of double images, despite the habit of binocular fixation,
+reaches up to this point. A second conclusion belongs to diplopia, and
+for that it is necessary to seek out from the confusion of objects, the
+two retinal images belonging to one and the same object, and the
+majority of people, though not all, take this second step also. It is
+seen at the same time that the opinion held by Donders, that diplopia is
+absent in squint, does not suffice, for this reason, because the image
+in the deviating eye is too excentric. What becomes then of the image
+lying in the centre of the retina?</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;">
+<img src="images/fig2.jpg" width="450" height="245" alt="Fig. 2." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 2.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>The absence of diplopia in squint may be explained quite simply by the
+fact that the habit of binocular fixation has not been learnt or has
+been forgotten; one can learn nothing that cannot be again forgotten.
+The normal fusion of the visual fields can only develop in consequence
+of binocular fixation,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span> and diplopia is only possible when some kind of
+binocular fusion exists. If no binocular fusion exists, then all
+possibility of diplopia is excluded. And why should those who squint
+from their earliest childhood not see well with both eyes, but yet with
+each separately, just as is the case with animals with laterally placed
+eyes? For example, in Fig. 3 there is convergent squint of the left eye,
+the right eye fixes the point a, whose retinal image is cast at <i>a</i>' in
+the left eye; the direction outwards in which these images are projected
+is discovered by drawing a straight line from <i>a</i> to <i>c</i> (the optical
+centre of the eye); suffice it to say that point <i>a</i> is seen by each eye
+in the direction in which it really stands.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/fig3.jpg" width="400" height="218" alt="Fig. 3." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 3.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>But although both eyes see at the same time, yet the close relation
+which in binocular fixation develops between the centres of the retin&aelig;
+does not occur in squint; firstly, because the retinal area in the
+squinting eye which corresponds to the fixation point is too excentric,
+and secondly, because the angle of the squint often changes. In
+binocular fixation, the fixation point of one retina answers to the
+corresponding point of the other; in squint, on account of the varying
+size of the squint angle, if a like relation develops between the eyes,
+the fixation point of one retina must correspond to a larger area of the
+other. Possibly this explains a fact that is often to be observed.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span> In
+those cases of squint where diplopia can easily be caused by covering
+one eye with a red glass and the other with a vertically deviating
+prism, the double images disappear on rotation of the prism round the
+axis of vision, as soon as the angle of the prism reaches an angle of
+about 45&deg;. The occurrence of double images shows that there exists for
+the upper and lower parts of the retin&aelig; a community of vision by no
+means coinciding with the identity principle. The disappearance of the
+diplopia can be explained by the fact that the variations of the squint
+angle take place chiefly in the horizontal direction. Therefore the area
+in the squinting eye that corresponds to the fovea centralis of the
+fixing eye must be more extensive in the horizontal than in the vertical
+direction. Alfred Graefe has designated this phenomenon as "regional
+exclusion." Whilst then a sort of community of vision exists for the
+upper and lower parts of the retin&aelig;, the sensations of the retinal area
+lying in the horizontal plane of the macula lutea of the squinting eye
+must be suppressed. The physiological occurrence of a suppression of the
+retinal images, as far as we are able to investigate it, always refers
+to the whole retina; however, the possibility of a "regional exclusion"
+should not be excluded to begin with; but in the inductive sciences it
+is for us to ask first, whether an incident really happens, and not
+whether it is possible. The fact from which Alfred Graefe draws his
+inference is not, as we have just seen, to be explained in any other
+way, and the ophthalmoscopic test described on p. 65 proves that also in
+these cases of "regional exclusion" both eyes are used for vision.</p>
+
+<p>In many cases of periodic squint the condition of binocular vision is
+very interesting. Binocular fusion may be quite absent even in normal
+position of the eyes; on the other hand the non-occurrence of diplopia
+in squint does not prevent the occurrence of perfect binocular fusion
+with a normal position. In periodic outward squint I have sometimes seen
+binocular<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span> fixation without the existence of binocular fusion; the
+excluded eye deviates outwards, but as soon as it is free it puts itself
+into fixation, whilst neither with prisms nor stereoscope can anything
+other than alternating vision be proved, <i>i. e.</i> neither binocular
+diplopia nor fusion.</p>
+
+<p>If squint arises when the habit of binocular single vision has become
+confirmed, diplopia is always present, at least at first; even children
+of six to seven years old make this statement uninvited, but they soon
+get accustomed to the new relations, and after a short time it is
+impossible to make them see double images (see Case 42). Habits cling
+more closely in adults, therefore that form of convergent squint in
+particular, which usually develops quickly in myopia of average degree,
+causes annoying diplopia to last for a longer time. For just when these
+patients want to employ binocular vision in order to estimate distance
+correctly, diplopia occurs to hinder and confuse them.</p>
+
+<p>It is otherwise with the relative divergence which is developed in
+consequence of myopia. At first diplopia is present here for a short
+time; in this case circumstances are specially favorable to a temporary
+suppression of the deviating eye; the fixing eye receives large distinct
+images to which the attention is directed. Meanwhile the relatively
+divergent eye is usually turned to other more distant objects that
+furnish indistinct retinal images, from which the attention is easily
+diverted. The habit of suppression may become so dominant that binocular
+fixation continues to exist for distant objects and the presence of
+binocular fusion is easily traceable, while for near objects, which are
+monocularly fixed with relative divergence, it is impossible to render
+the patient conscious of the images of the deviating eye.</p>
+
+<p>Considerable squint is by no means necessary for the cessation of normal
+binocular single vision; slight, frequently recurring deviations are
+quite sufficient, as in those cases<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span> where want of control renders
+physiological innervation for convergence more difficult. Double images
+are present here, although not in a troublesome way, as is usual in
+relative divergence, but binocular single vision does not exist even for
+distance. The reason for this does not lie in the impossibility of
+fixing the same object simultaneously with both eyes, for the
+objectively proved deviation may be extremely slight. A union cannot be
+obtained even by prisms. If crossed double images are present close
+together, a prism of a few degrees base inwards suffices to make them
+homonymous. The habit of binocular single vision is lost, in consequence
+of that disturbance to the innervation of the interni which is
+designated as insufficiency of the same.</p>
+
+<p>The stereoscope, as well as the prism, is useful for testing binocular
+single vision, especially when it is suitably modified for the purpose.
+The prismatic glasses usually attached to stereoscopes are here quite
+superfluous. The advantage of the prismatic deviation consists solely in
+the fact that the centres of the images fixed for the macula lutea on
+each side can be removed farther from one another than the distance
+apart of the eyes amounts to, so that a greater extension of the visual
+area is rendered possible. Ordinary stereoscopic pictures are quite
+useless for testing binocular vision; it is a question here of employing
+diagrams, which contain on the one hand very prominent identical figures
+stimulating binocular fusion but which, on the other hand, offer for
+each eye special attractions not present in the visual field of the
+other. Further, it is desirable to regulate the stereoscope so that the
+glasses are not firmly inserted, but that glasses from the trial case
+may be applied according to the condition of refraction of the patient
+and the distance of the stereoscopic images.</p>
+
+<p>The stereoscope is generally used with the greatest advantage in those
+cases where there is no conspicuous deviation, and by testing binocular
+vision conclusions may be drawn as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> to whether normal binocular fusion
+exists or has disappeared in consequence of the squint.</p>
+
+<p>It is desirable to use both methods of investigation, that with the
+stereoscope as well as prisms, as each test has its own value. One who
+at once combines the stereoscopic fields of vision certainly has
+binocular single vision; in other cases this is only so far lost that
+the stereoscopic combination does not take place at once but only after
+some trouble. Care must be taken, especially when one eye has defective
+vision, that the corresponding visual field contains objects
+sufficiently large and easily recognisable, as very small objects which
+do not correspond to the lowered visual acuity are easily overlooked. It
+sometimes happens that both fields are seen at the same time, but that
+there is no fusion; finally it happens frequently that there is complete
+suppression of one visual field. In testing with prisms it may appear
+doubtful as to whether binocular fusion or suppression of one eye
+exists; however, the stereoscope at once gives us certain information.
+It must not be forgotten that the altered relations between the eyes,
+which are always possible in squint, also appear at the same time; he
+who sees double with prisms, may yet be able completely to suppress the
+stereoscopic visual field of one eye. Binocular fusion, suppression of
+the squinting eye and simultaneous vision with both eyes without
+binocular fusion can alternate in the same individual. Von Kries has
+come to the same conclusion, and if our colleague is unable to explain
+all the phenomena of binocular vision that he could observe in his own
+case, we need not be astonished if we sometimes hear from our patients
+statements that appear incomprehensible and unphysiological.</p>
+
+<p>At any rate it is evident that the absence of diplopia in squint can
+easily be understood, without adopting the arbitrary idea of a constant,
+habitual suppression of the image of the squinting eye.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span></p>
+<h2>VISUAL ACUTENESS OF THE SQUINTING EYE.</h2>
+
+
+<p>Whether the state of refraction or the condition of the muscular
+equilibrium is held to be the chief cause of squint, defective vision of
+one eye will always have to be acknowledged as one of the most important
+favouring circumstances; in order to cure squint it is important to have
+regard to the visual acuity of both eyes, and not only to the defective
+condition. But this is no easy matter.</p>
+
+<p>First it is to be observed, that most cases arise at an age when an
+objective determination of refraction is possible, but when the visual
+acuteness cannot be determined. Even in children who have received
+slight instruction, it is frequently difficult to distinguish whether
+imperfect knowledge of the letters or faulty visual acuteness is the
+cause of the non-recognition of the test-letters; when testing the
+vision of children it is often better to use figures than letters.</p>
+
+<p>Further, in these cases it is much to be desired that the habit of
+determining the refraction and visual acuteness at the same time should
+be discontinued, particularly in reduced visual acuteness, as the
+test-tables only contain a few letters, which have to be recognised at a
+distance of 5 to 6 metres. If they have once been read with one eye it
+may easily happen that in testing the second eye they are repeated from
+memory, without being clearly recognised; even a child soon learns the
+few letters by heart. Therefore, when it has been a case of determining
+the visual acuteness I have always conducted the examination at a
+distance of one metre, as the choice<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span> of letters or figures which can be
+employed at this distance is much larger than for greater distances. In
+every case the reading of test-letters must be used as an additional
+means of examination. We must never forget that the test of vision is a
+perfectly subjective examination, and that we are obliged first of all
+to accept the statements of patients as they are given without knowing
+what they are worth. I have met with patients in the most highly
+educated classes of society who, in intra-ocular troubles, for example,
+h&aelig;morrhage of the retinal artery in the macula lutea, could not
+distinguish the largest type in the first examination, and the next day
+(perhaps with slight difficulty) could read small print.</p>
+
+<p>Such inaccuracies may continue to exist during repeated examinations and
+for long periods. One of my patients, for instance, who first came under
+treatment in the year 1873, had extreme myopia in the left eye with good
+visual acuity; with the right eye, which was also myopic, and had
+suffered for several years from choroiditis of the macula lutea he could
+read only No. 20 Snellen, and a year later 7-1/2 was read with
+difficulty, word by word. Choroiditis of the macula lutea gradually
+developed in the left eye, and in the same proportion the statements as
+to visual acuteness of the right eye improved, so that finally at the
+end of 1881, 0&middot;5 was read with difficulty with this eye, while the left
+still sufficed to read 0&middot;4 (at about 5 cm.). As I tried to comfort the
+patient, who was very anxious about his left eye, with the fact that the
+right eye had considerably improved in the course of the year, he
+replied that he might previously have seen just as well with the right
+eye if he had only taken the trouble, this was certainly my own opinion.</p>
+
+<p>The attention and intelligence shown by patients during examination
+materially influences its results, and one should never hold the first
+trial of vision to be conclusive. We must always remember, however, that
+all conclusions drawn from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span> visual acuteness become more unreliable in
+proportion as the latter is slight. We must attend to some peculiar
+difficulties in testing the vision of those who squint or we shall be
+liable to make great mistakes. When testing the squinting eye,
+particularly in children, it is not sufficient merely to cover the other
+or to hold the hand over it, for they know how to bring the usual eye
+into fixation by holding the head on one side or peeping between the
+fingers; we must keep it carefully closed with a bandage.</p>
+
+<p>It is still more frequently the case that visual acuteness is stated to
+be less than it is in reality. The result of always using the better eye
+for fixation is, that fixation is not learnt with the weaker one. Even
+where there is no squint we see very frequently that in one-sided
+hypermetropia the accommodation is only used in that proportion which
+has become habitual to the emmetropic eye and does not therefore suffice
+to produce clear retinal images, while good visual acuteness is obtained
+by means of the correcting convex glasses. In the case of squinters
+(even without difference of refraction) it happens very frequently that
+the first statements as to the visual power are considerably below the
+truth. Patients who assert that they can only read the largest print
+with difficulty, frequently read smaller, and even the smallest type
+without more trouble, and we must be careful to ascertain this at first.
+Accurate reports are usually obtained more quickly by means of convex
+glasses or eserine. In any case insufficient accommodation is, according
+to this, one of the difficulties, but not the only one, which has to be
+overcome before the squinting eye can be put into fixation. We can
+understand that the innervation necessary for distinct vision can be set
+aside even without loss of visual acuteness, just as we see the movement
+of convergence disappear without the interni losing their capacity for
+contraction.</p>
+
+<p>In order to explain the relation between squint and defective<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span> vision,
+we must first consider the question hitherto neglected, or what is
+worse, answered with preconceived opinion, as to whether the same form
+of defective sight which is so common in squint also occurs without
+squint. No one doubts the existence of congenital amblyopia,
+nevertheless it has received but little attention in the handbooks on
+ophthalmology. Leber, for instance (in the well-known compilation, vol.
+v), does not mention it at all.</p>
+
+<p>A more or less considerable reduction of visual acuteness, with good
+field of vision, normal sense of colour and normal ophthalmoscopic
+condition, are characteristic of congenital amblyopia. Colour-blindness
+may of course be present at the same time. I also hold as probable the
+very rare occurrence of congenital defects of the visual field in good
+central vision, but I will reserve for the present the few observations
+I possess on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>Together with congenital defective vision we must consider the
+depreciation in visual acuteness usually present in nystagmus, although
+it might be asserted that it can neither be the cause nor the result of
+the nystagmus, for we find very considerable degrees of congenital
+defective sight in both eyes without nystagmus, as well as nystagmus
+with remarkably good visual acuteness. Not to complicate the question,
+however, I have excluded all cases of nystagmus from the following
+investigation. All cases of myopia of higher degree (<i>i. e.</i> of more
+than 6 D.) have also been excluded, as in such cases for various
+well-known reasons the full visual acuteness is never present. In the
+case of individual patients who remained for years under my observation
+I have been able to convince myself that visual acuteness decreased in
+accordance with the increase of myopia; on the other hand, however, it
+appeared to me very probable that just those cases of myopia, which from
+the beginning do not possess full visual acuteness, have a special
+tendency to increase quickly.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>For instance, if the examination of a hypermetropic eye, whose defect
+can be exactly determined by means of the ophthalmoscope, shows very
+faulty visual acuteness which is but slightly or not at all improved on
+correction of the hypermetropia, it is clear that the cause of defective
+sight is not to be sought in the hypermetropia. It is just the same with
+astigmatism. In defective vision with astigmatism proved by means of the
+ophthalmoscope, how frequently it is the case that not even the
+slightest improvement can be obtained with cylindrical glasses. This is
+usually attributed to the presence of an irregular astigmatism situated
+near the asymmetric meridian. If we illuminate the eye by means of a
+plane mirror, and observe one spot on the pupillary area which looks
+sometimes bright, sometimes dark, during slight rotations of the glass,
+this appearance can only be caused by the above-mentioned irregularity
+of the refraction of light, and it will be easy to determine whether the
+same takes place in the cornea or in the lens. But if this appearance is
+not present then irregular astigmatism cannot be proved. It is purely
+intentional, or a play upon words, if we refer an existing defective
+sight to an optic cause which cannot be proved. For instance, if
+haziness of the cornea exists, it is not difficult to learn to estimate
+by practical experience whether the amount of visual disturbance
+corresponds to the optic irregularities caused by the opacities and
+irregular refraction of the cornea. Slightly nebulous corne&aelig; with
+disproportionately bad vision were therefore included in the following
+statistics; however, they do not influence the result as there are only
+ten cases in all. On the other hand, considerable opacity of the corne&aelig;
+or cases which were complicated with anterior synechia, &amp;c., were
+excluded from the statistics.</p>
+
+<p>If then we find defective vision, the development of which has not been
+noticed by the patient, together with normal ophthalmoscopic condition
+and full visual field, and if it is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span> further seen that the condition
+remains unchanged for years, we have every reason for considering the
+defective sight to be congenital. The statements of patients must of
+course be received with caution. If congenital amblyopia of moderate
+degree exists in both eyes, patients do not usually know that it is
+possible for anyone to see better; if the congenital defect is one
+sided, it is generally only casually noticed on closing the better eye.
+We can scarcely doubt that it is a case of congenital amblyopia if it
+happens in children. Acquired defective sight without ophthalmoscopic
+cause seldom occurs among children. I have seen a few cases as a result
+of severe cerebral disease (hydrocephalus, for example); so-called
+an&aelig;sthesia retin&aelig;, or amblyopia marked by contraction of the visual
+field is not quite so rare. It is easy to avoid confounding both these
+cases with congenital amblyopia.</p>
+
+<p>One must be more careful about drawing conclusions with regard to
+adults, for on the one hand it happens that gradually developed
+monocular visual disturbances are only accidentally observed by patients
+after they have reached a high degree, and it is very difficult then to
+persuade these attentive observers that it is not a case of sudden
+blindness of one eye. (Only a few people seem to be really aware that
+they have two eyes, and still fewer appear to suspect the existence of a
+visual field.)</p>
+
+<p>In all these cases opportunity is hardly given for mistakes with
+reference to the diagnosis of congenital amblyopia, as slowly developed
+monocular defect scarcely occurs without ophthalmoscopic cause. On the
+other hand, ophthalmoscopic symptoms (such as h&aelig;morrhage of the retinal
+artery in the macula lutea) may disappear without leaving a trace, while
+defective vision remains. The law of habit, however, usually helps us
+here. In congenital monocular defect patients are generally accustomed
+to this condition, and only notice it when special claim is made on the
+visual faculty of this eye,&mdash;he,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span> on the other hand, who is accustomed
+to see with two equally good eyes, may not observe a gradually occurring
+blindness of one eye, if his talent of observation be faulty, but I have
+never had reason to suppose that a rapid depreciation of the central
+visual acuteness of one eye is also overlooked. Rapidly occurring
+monocular visual disturbances are noticed, whether detected with or
+without the ophthalmoscope.</p>
+
+<p>Two peculiarities appear in isolated cases of congenital amblyopia,
+which may render the testing of vision difficult: rapid fatigue of the
+retina, and depreciation of the central visual acuteness in such a way,
+that an adjoining part of the retina possesses a better visual faculty
+than the centre.</p>
+
+<p>Rapid fatigue of the retina occurs in comparatively good visual
+acuteness. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 16.</span>&mdash;Mr. W&mdash;, &aelig;t. 35, came under treatment for conjunctivitis. In
+testing the vision, emmetropia (or doubtful hypermetropia) was found on
+the left, V. = 5/6. Refraction of right eye similar to that of left, V.
+= 5/18 to 5/12, but with rapidly occurring fatigue of the retina.
+Patient had observed this fifteen years before, when shooting during his
+period of army service. Position and movements of the eyes are normal.</p>
+
+<p>This peculiarity occurs more often in higher degrees of defective
+vision. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 17.</span>&mdash;Mrs. von G&mdash;, &aelig;t. 60, has always seen badly with the left eye.
+On the right H. 1&middot;25 D., V. 5/12. On the left with + 2 D., V. 1/12 with
++ 5 D. words of No. 1&middot;75 were recognised; but the visual acuteness above
+stated is only present at the first moment; after a few seconds
+everything disappears in a fog. The left eye has a slightly conical
+nebulous cornea, detected only on focal illumination, which does not,
+however, cause the slightest irregular astigmatism, and cannot,
+therefore, serve as explanation of the defective sight.</p>
+
+<p>This rapid fatigue, which only permits the visual acuity<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span> present to be
+estimated for a short period at a time, may easily result in the visual
+acuity being supposed to be worse than it is.</p>
+
+<p>The other phenomenon above mentioned, which occurs in defective vision
+without being actually a necessary symptom, is the depreciation of the
+central visual acuity, which we designate as central scotoma in acquired
+amblyopia. It should be remembered that the visual acuteness which we
+determine under these conditions is something different from what we are
+usually accustomed to designate by this idea. When we simply talk of
+visual acuity we always imply the central visual acuity; however, in
+cases where the centre of the retina is so injured in its function, that
+the peripheral parts lying near are too often called into requisition,
+we do not determine the central visual acuity at all, but that of the
+nearest and at the same time best, excentric part. We cannot prevent
+patients from using that part of the retina which seems best to them for
+recognising the test objects. In such cases (just as in acquired central
+scotoma) continuous print is read badly, and with more trouble than one
+would expect from the visual acuteness which is specified in the
+recognition of single letters. Of course spelling and reading are two
+different things; the excentric visual acuity may perfectly suffice for
+the recognition of single letters, central and also excentric visual
+acuity is necessary for reading. There are patients who, despite full
+visual acuteness, are unable to read continuously, as soon as a defect
+in the right half of the visual field extends close to the fixation
+point. To read fluently, the excentric vision must work on in advance
+for the width of several letters, but if the first letter is seen
+excentrically, the excentric visual acuteness rapidly sinking in a
+physiological way, does not suffice for the following ones.</p>
+
+<p>When testing the vision these circumstances should be carefully
+regarded. The apparent contradiction between the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span> visual acuteness
+specified with test-letters, and the uncertainty in reading continuous
+print, may be taken for simulation (I have seen some sad examples of
+this in acquired central scotoma), and, on the other hand, if in the
+form of defective vision now under discussion we content ourselves by
+merely employing reading tests, we take the visual acuteness to be worse
+than it is, or than we find it later when single test-letters are used,
+for even though excentric, it is yet always visual acuteness. The
+excentricity of that part of the retina put into fixation is usually so
+slight, that the oblique direction of the visual axis cannot be seen
+with the naked eye; if considerable and extensive defect of the centre
+of the retina is present, either varying fixation occurs, sometimes
+parts lying to the nasal and sometimes to the temporal side are put into
+fixation; or excentric fixation exists; an inner retinal area but
+sometimes also a temporal then usually has comparatively the best visual
+acuteness.</p>
+
+<p>A third peculiarity which sometimes occurs in extreme degrees of
+congenital amblyopia, is monocular nystagmus of the weak eye. This
+trembling may be so slight that it is only observable during
+investigation with the ophthalmoscope; in other cases it is most marked
+as soon as the weak eye is put into fixation by exclusion of the sound
+one.</p>
+
+<p>Cases of congenital amblyopia in both eyes, where no explanatory cause
+can be traced, and no nystagmus is present, are rare, but all the more
+interesting. For instance:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 18.</span>&mdash;Mr. F&mdash;, &aelig;t. 56, has seen badly from childhood; the visual
+acuteness of each eye singly examined amounts to 1/18 to 1/12, binocular
+1/12. No. 0&middot;75 is read with difficulty at 8 cm. Ophthalmoscopic
+condition is normal. In mydriasis by atropine hypermetropia of 3 to 4
+dioptres results. With convex 3&middot; 5 D. on the right V. 1/18 to 1/12, on
+the left V. 1/12, binocular V. 1/12 to 1/9, with convex 6 D. still only
+0&middot;75 can be read, but more fluently than with the naked eyes.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Normal binocular fusion may continue to exist even in extreme degrees of
+monocular weak sight; I have observed it up to a visual acuteness of
+1/24. The stereoscope is well adapted to prove binocular fusion in these
+cases; only we must then take care that sufficiently large letters are
+present in the visual field of the defective eye, so that they may
+easily be recognised with the existing visual acuteness. Binocular
+fusion is naturally rendered still more difficult if the weak-sighted
+eye is at the same time hypermetropic to a high degree, as it then
+receives simultaneously indistinct retinal images on account of the
+difference of refraction; and yet in the above table there are 117 cases
+with hypermetropia of at least 2 D. in the better eye, and faulty visual
+acuteness in the other, 7 with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V.
+1/12, and 9 with less than 1/12 to V. 1/36.</p>
+
+<p>In the highest degrees of congenital defective vision, binocular fusion
+cannot as a rule be proved; partly because the methods of investigation
+by which we are able to prove binocular fusion presuppose the existence
+of a sufficient visual acuteness. On the other hand, it cannot be
+expected that normal binocular vision can be learnt with such a large
+amount of monocular defective vision. If the relative strength of the
+muscles is normal, so also are the position and movements of the eyes,
+if elastic preponderance on the part of the muscles is present, which in
+monocular defective vision of considerable degree is no longer governed
+by binocular fusion, and this is frequently the case, squint is
+developed.</p>
+
+<p>Sometimes other congenital anomalies are present at the same time with
+congenital defective vision (for example, congenital dermoid growths on
+the edge of the cornea), and undoubtedly hereditary influences play a
+considerable r&ocirc;le therein.</p>
+
+<p>In order to determine the relation of congenital defective vision
+without squint, to defective vision with squint, I have<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span> taken those
+cases where congenital defective vision without squint was observed,
+together with the cases of squint, from the diaries of my private
+practice for the last ten years. I have personally investigated every
+case, and the observations on each were carefully examined before being
+included in the statistics; all cases with myopia of six or more
+dioptres, all cases of double nystagmus, and, finally, all those cases
+where the previous existence of squint might be suspected, were
+excluded, as above stated. I must also remark that before the last ten
+years I had not begun to collect these cases. In order to find monocular
+congenital defective vision one must seek for it, as patients usually
+come under treatment for quite different disorders, and in the
+consulting-room there is not always time carefully to investigate what
+possesses interest for us but none for the patient. In cases of squint
+the opportunity for investigating the power of vision does not escape us
+so easily, and yet the same list, which contains among 629 patients 177
+cases of squint with a visual acuteness of 1/8 to less than 1/36,
+furnished at the same time 98 cases with undoubted congenital defective
+vision of the same high degree without squint, which I place together in
+the following review.</p>
+
+<p>Cases of congenital amblyopia with visual acuteness of 1/7 are so
+frequent, that I have not drawn up special statistics of them. I was not
+anxious to collect a large number of cases but only material for
+evidence. I have therefore divided the 98 cases I observed into 3
+groups. (1) Cases with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V. 1/12; (2)
+V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36; (3) visual acuteness less than 1/36. The
+limits between these groups are of course not very sharply defined, for
+what is designated as "measurement" of visual acuteness contains, even
+if we accept the statements of patients as trustworthy, not an
+inconsiderable number of sources of error; and we often find a
+remarkable absence of conformity in the analysed causes<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span> of congenital
+amblyopia, according as we seek to determine the visual acuteness by
+means of single test-letters or by reading printed matter. In a case of
+visual acuteness of 1/12 No. 0&middot;75 with convex 6 was the smallest type
+that could be read, and that with difficulty, larger type was usually
+required; and in one case where at first only single words of No. 2&middot;25
+were read with difficulty&mdash;this test was on that account repeated in
+myosis by eserine&mdash;No. 1&middot;75 was finally the smallest print which could
+with the same difficulty be deciphered. In the division of the groups
+here arranged the best visual acuteness ascertained in the various
+examinations was always used as the basis.</p>
+
+<p>A. Vision less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 38 cases. The examination of the
+better eye showed:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot">
+<p>(<i>a</i>) Emmetropia in 18 cases. A determination of refraction,
+mostly ophthalmoscopic, of the weaker eye is submitted in 11
+cases, which divide themselves into, 4 with emmetropia, 3
+with hypermetropia (of H. 2 D. and 2&middot;25 D.), 3 with
+hypermetropic astigmatism, I with myopic astigmatism.</p>
+
+<p>(<i>b</i>) Myopia in 5 cases (3 of M. 1 D. to 1&middot;5 D., 2 of M. 4&middot;5
+D. and 4 D.), the condition of the defective eye was
+determined in 3 cases, and was twice hypermetropic, once
+astigmatic.</p>
+
+<p>(<i>c</i>) Hypermetropia in 8 cases, hypermetropic astigmatism in
+3. In 4 cases an exact determination of refraction even of
+the better eye was for some reason impracticable.</p></div>
+
+<p>There are 4 cases in this group where the visual acuteness in both eyes
+did not exceed the above-stated small amount, and one which was
+interesting from another point of view.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 19.</span>&mdash;Max L&mdash;, &aelig;t. 8-1/2, recognises No. 24, and a few letters of 18
+at 5 metres with the better eye with convex<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span> 6 D.; at 1 metre V. 1/4 to
+1/3, the left eye recognises only No. 60 at 5 m. with + 6 D. at 1 m. No.
+0&middot;75 is read with difficulty. If we exclude one eye it lapses into now
+less, now greater convergence, and still no squint is present, but
+diplopia as well as binocular fusion can be proved by the aid of prisms.
+The theory of Donders that squint is less frequent in hypermetropia of
+high degree because too strong convergence would not suffice to furnish
+clear retinal images, is scarcely tenable in the face of such cases. If
+indistinct retinal images are added to a visual acuteness of only 1/3 to
+1/4 still, even with faulty accommodation, it is difficult to believe
+how a child could learn to read if it did not hold the book close to its
+eyes, which was not the case here, and indeed seldom happens. Therefore,
+in spite of defective vision the accommodation must have sufficed,
+without sacrificing binocular fusion, whilst in all probability
+accommodative convergence followed on exclusion of one eye.</p>
+
+<p>B. 48 cases had visual acuteness from 1/12 to 1/36. The better eye was&mdash;</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Emmetropic in 16 cases; in 6 of them the refraction of
+the defective eye was determined, which showed in one case
+emmetropia, 3 hypermetropia, 2 astigmatism.</p>
+
+<p>(<i>b</i>) Myopia of the better eye was present in 7 cases (in 3
+myopia of 1 D., in 4 M. 3 D. to 6 D.).</p>
+
+<p>(<i>c</i>) Hypermetropia in 18, astigmatism in 4 cases. In 3
+cases the condition of the better eye was, for some reason
+or other, indeterminable.</p></div>
+
+<p>In this group I should like to point out the following cases as worthy
+of attention:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 20.</span>&mdash;Margarethe T&mdash;, &aelig;t. 16, has hypermetropia 2 D. in the right
+eye, V. 5/6, in the left the ophthalmoscope shows<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span> with an otherwise
+normal condition a higher degree of hypermetropia, with + 6&middot;5 D., V.
+1/18, with + 10 D. No. 3&middot;0 is read. No spectacles have been used until
+now; for the past few years school tasks have been performed with a
+certain effort, only during the last year the asthenopia has increased.
+Squint is not present, and with prisms as well as with the stereoscope
+(by the use of objects, whose size corresponds to the defective sight on
+the left side) binocular fusion can be proved.</p>
+
+<p>The case is the same as regards divergent strabismus.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 21.</span>&mdash;Mr. H&mdash;, &aelig;t. 28, has myopia 6 D., V. 6/9 in the right eye; the
+left eye has always been weak sighted, emmetropia is detected with the
+ophthalmoscope, with normal fundus, V. 1/18. No squint, binocular fusion
+can be proved with prisms.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 22.</span>&mdash;Mr. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 47, has hypermetropia 5 D., V. 5/9 in the right
+eye. Left eye with + 5 D., V. 1/18 (a few letters of 12 also were
+recognised at 1 m.). It seems, however, that the patient is not able
+exactly to indicate the position of the retinal images of his left eye,
+he does not know, as he expresses himself, "whether the letters stand
+here or there." Patient observed the defective sight long ago; the
+ophthalmoscopic condition is normal. Patient really comes on account of
+his son, aged 7-1/2, in whom hypermetropia of 3&middot;5 dioptres is detected
+with the ophthalmoscope, right eye with + 3&middot;5 V. 5/9. Left eye has
+convergent squint, V. 1/36, No. 3&middot;0 is read with + 6&middot;5 D.</p>
+
+<p>The hereditary tendency is seen also in the following case:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 23.</span>&mdash;Mrs. S&mdash;, &aelig;t. about 46, on the left H. 4 D., V. 5/18 to 5/12,
+has used no spectacles until now, and reads No. 0&middot;75 without glasses at
+about 15 cm. R. with + 4 D., V. 1/18, with + 6&middot;5 D. large letters of No.
+5&middot;0 are recognised.</p>
+
+<p>Two sons, present at the same time, are hypermetropic. One has in either
+eye V. 1/4, the other a slighter degree of congenital amblyopia.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 24.</span>&mdash;Johanna L&mdash;, &aelig;t. 4, came under treatment for a congenital
+fibroma covered with hair, about the size of a cherry-stone, situated on
+the outer corneal margin of the left eye, which was removed. Three years
+later, when the child had learnt to read, emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness was observed in the right eye, with the left No. 4&middot;0 only is
+read with difficulty. The ophthalmoscope shows a slight degree of
+irregular astigmatism of the cornea, which in no way explains the
+defective vision; the image of the fundus is perfectly clear and quite
+normal.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 25</span> afforded me a not altogether pleasant surprise. Martin M&mdash;, &aelig;t.
+58, has matured cataract in the right eye, with perfectly satisfactory
+light reflex, proper projection, &amp;c. On the left progressive cloudiness
+of the lens has begun. The course of operation and cure were regular in
+every respect, but the power of vision finally was so small that with a
+clear pupillary area, and otherwise normal condition, only single words
+of No. 3&middot;0 were recognised with difficulty at 10 to 15 cm. with convex
+20 D. For the first time the patient remembers that he noticed the
+defective sight in his right eye at the age of sixteen, and was for this
+exempt from army service. The operation performed later on the left eye
+procured satisfactory vision.</p>
+
+
+<p>C. Visual acuteness of less than 1/36 12 cases.</p>
+
+<p>Determination of refraction of the better eye is given in 6 cases, and
+showed twice emmetropia, twice slight myopia, twice hypermetropia. I
+only possess an exact ophthalmoscopic determination of the condition of
+the defective-sighted eye in one instance with H. 2&middot;5 D.</p>
+
+<p>This group is of special interest in that it represents the extreme
+degrees of congenital amblyopia, and, on the other hand, because it
+contains 5 cases of children under 10 years of age.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 26.</span>&mdash;Constanze von M&mdash;, &aelig;t. 9-1/2. Defective vision on the left
+side had been noticed long before by the child's parents. On May 1,
+1879, emmetropia was observed in right eye, V. 5/12 to 5/9. No. 0&middot;4 is
+read at 15 cm. On the left, only movements of the hand are seen, fingers
+cannot be counted even when close to the eye; the visual field is good,
+that is, on moving the hand in the periphery of the visual field the
+child sees "something" without being able to state what it is. Reaction
+of the pupils as rapid and equal as usual. The ophthalmoscopic condition
+(even with dilated pupils) is perfectly normal. All tests for simulation
+were of course applied.</p>
+
+<p>On account of the importance of the case, I suggested another
+examination a year and a half later, on the 22nd December, 1880, which
+showed precisely the same result as the former one&mdash;optic disc, macula
+lutea, &amp;c., perfectly normal, the ophthalmoscopic determination of the
+refraction shows H. 2&middot;5 D.</p>
+
+<p>The child's father also possesses in the left eye a slight degree of
+congenital defective sight, observed for many years, with normal
+ophthalmoscopic condition; No. 0&middot;5 is read with + 6&middot;5 D. at 10 cm.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 27.</span>&mdash;Tina S&mdash;, &aelig;t. 6. The defective sight of the left eye had been
+remarked some months previously; report on July 16th, 1878: R. full
+visual acuteness, L. movements of the hand are scarcely visible. The
+child cannot count fingers. Normal ophthalmoscopic condition. Eserine
+and separate use were prescribed. On September 9th, 1878, fingers were
+counted with the left eye at 1&middot;5 m., single words of No. 4&middot;0 were
+recognised, No. 3&middot;5 with convex 6&middot;5 D., but always with oscillating
+fixation. The improvement in the child's statements may be referred to
+the fact that she had meanwhile learnt to form right conclusions from
+the very imperfect sensual impressions of her left eye.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 28.</span>&mdash;Frank J&mdash;, &aelig;t. 10. Left eye. V. 10/50 to 10/40, No. 1-1/2
+Snellen is read at 4 inches. On the right, nystagmus on fixation,
+fingers are counted at 5-6 feet. The ophthalmoscopic condition is
+normal. A sister of the boy squints.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 29.</span>&mdash;Ernest G&mdash;, &aelig;t. 8, has slight nebul&aelig; on both corne&aelig;. On the
+left V. 15/40. On the right, fingers are counted at 4 inches with visual
+axis deviating inwards.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 30.</span>&mdash;I operated on Moritz L&mdash; for congenital cataract before he was
+a year old in 1869 by means of a needle operation. In June, 1877, a thin
+ophthalmoscopically transparent secondary cataract appeared in both
+eyes; on the left, with convex 12 D. V. 3/24 to 3/18, with convex 16 D.
+No. 0&middot;4 is read at 10 cm. On the right, with convex 12 D., fingers are
+counted with difficulty at about 1 m., with inward deviation of visual
+axis.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 31</span> is also worthy of note. Carl H&mdash;, &aelig;t. 22, shows quite a number
+of congenital anomalies on the left side of the face, harelip, deformed
+nostril and a skin defect on the inner corner of the eyelid. There is a
+congenital dermoid growth of the size of half a pea situated on the
+inner lower corneal margin. A slight irregularity in the curve of the
+cornea near the dermoid is detected with the ophthalmoscope; the fundus
+of the eye is perfectly normal. Fingers are not counted further off than
+a metre with visual axis deviating inwards. The right eye is emmetropic
+(perhaps slightly hypermetropic), and has full visual acuteness. There
+is no squint.</p>
+
+<p>It is customary to "explain" these cases of monocular amblyopia by
+previously existing squint, and one is quite satisfied if by the
+examination of patients it is only possible to prove that they have
+occasionally squinted, although the advocates of the amblyopia ex
+anopsia disallow the presence of the same under these conditions, that
+is, in periodic squint. Of course a theory which cannot exist without
+the assertion that occasional alternation suffices to hinder the
+development<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span> of defective vision caused by disuse, cannot possibly hold
+periodic squint to be the cause of it. Certainly permanent squint may
+also disappear, but this much I have been able to determine, that this
+seldom happens before the twelfth year of life, and one may surely
+reckon that children in whom permanent squint is developed at the usual
+early period of life, still squint at the age of ten years. Cases 24 and
+26 to 30 can under no circumstances be explained by previous squint,
+notwithstanding that they represent the extremest degrees of amblyopia,
+but the question is undoubtedly that of congenital defective vision;
+moreover I have excluded from the statistics of congenital amblyopia all
+cases in which the previous presence of squint could even be supposed.</p>
+
+<p>A table of the cases above described with reference to the defective
+condition is interesting; when a determination of refraction existed for
+the weak eye I have given it, and when this was not the case I have
+stated that of the better eye, thus it is seen that among 85 cases in
+which the refraction was determined, hypermetropia (including
+hypermetropic astigmatism) was present in 39. Hypermetropia was found
+then in 47 per cent of all the cases. The percentage would probably be
+higher, if all weak-sighted eyes had been examined from the beginning as
+to their state of refraction, but as I only learnt to know the relation
+between hypermetropia and the higher degrees of congenital amblyopia
+from my statistics, I did not take notice of this relation when
+investigating individual cases.</p>
+
+<p>How does congenital amblyopia now stand in relation to that disturbance
+of vision which we observe in squint? I see no difference; whether
+squint is present or not, the form of defective vision is precisely the
+same, and nothing happens in the combination with squint which could not
+also be proved without it. The relation to hypermetropia, which is
+proved with congenital amblyopia, also appears in squint.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>A collective table of cases of convergent and divergent squint included
+in the statistics (pp. 19 and 47) shows:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) In myopia, emmetropia, and doubtful hypermetropia,
+ with convergent and divergent squint together
+ 329 cases. Among them:</p></div>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>Visual acuteness</td><td align='left'>to 1/7</td><td align='left'>&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>239</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>less than</td><td align='left'>1/7 to V. 1/12</td><td align='left'>19</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='center'>"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>1/12 to V. 1/36</td><td align='left'>46</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='center'>"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>1/36</td><td align='left'>25</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Defective sight of higher degree than 1/7, 27&middot;3 per
+ cent.</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>b</i>) In hypermetropia 1 to 3 D., including the few cases
+ of hypermetropia with divergent squint, 177 cases.
+ Among them:</p></div>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>Visual acuteness</td><td align='left'>to 1/7</td><td align='left'>&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>121</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>less than</td><td align='left'>1/7 to V. 1/12</td><td align='left'>17</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>1/12 to V. 1/36</td><td align='left'>27</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>1/36</td><td align='left'>12</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Defective sight then, 31&middot;6 per cent.</p></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>c</i>) In hypermetropia 3 D. and more, 70 cases with convergent
+ squint, with:</p></div>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>Vision to 1/7</td><td align='left'>39</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/7 to V. 1/12</td><td align='left'>8</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/12 to V. 1/36</td><td align='left'>14</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/36</td><td align='left'>9</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Defective sight then, 44&middot;2 per cent.</p></div>
+
+<p>This regular increase of defective sight with the increase of the
+hypermetropia can be no mere accident, and speaks strongly for the
+identity of defective vision in squint with congenital amblyopia. Were
+defective vision caused by the squint the various states of refraction
+would show no difference in the percentage of defective vision.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Further, the circumstance is worthy of remark that among 198 cases of
+periodic squint (convergent and divergent) which are applicable for the
+statistics of visual acuteness&mdash;</p>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align='left'>170</td><td align='left'>possess</td><td align='left'>V. to 1/7.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>16</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/7 to V. 1/12.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>9</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/12 to V. 1/36.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>3</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>V. &lt; 1/36.</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="3">14&middot;2 per cent. then of defective vision of considerable degree.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<p>That defective sight on the whole plays an influential part as a cause
+of squint is doubted by no one, indeed we see blind eyes lapse into
+squint as soon as the conditions necessary to it are supplied by the
+muscles. Of all the prevailing causes present defective vision will be
+the more decisive in proportion as it is of high degree; for the motive
+which despite the presence of favouring circumstances can prevent the
+real occurrence of squint, binocular vision, becomes less efficacious as
+the defective vision becomes more considerable. As binocular fusion
+takes place frequently in periodic squint, for a time at least, that is
+as long as proper fixation lasts, one can understand that periodic
+squint exists chiefly in cases where the visual faculty of both eyes is
+good. Even the highest degrees of congenital amblyopia are not excluded,
+for periodic squint appears where the faculty of binocular fusion has
+been completely lost. Further, that considerable congenital defective
+sight is more frequent with than without squint, may be accounted for
+quite simply by the fact that, in extreme degrees of it, binocular
+fusion cannot be learnt at all, while in the lesser degrees it is more
+easily forgotten again.</p>
+
+<p>If defective vision is undoubtedly one of the causes of squint, we must
+seek for the grounds upon which it has been taken to be a consequence of
+squint, and described as amblyopia ex anopsia. I will not inquire to
+whom the honour of this<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span> invention belongs. I do not want to write a
+history of mistakes but only to examine the basis of the views now
+current. The most complete record of the same may be found in the
+well-known journal on the 'Cure of Eye Diseases,' vol. v, p. 1011.
+Leber, who does not seem to recognise the existence of congenital
+amblyopia, has shown quite a special predilection for amblyopia ex
+anopsia.</p>
+
+<p>Amblyopia from want of use, which formerly included all possible
+disturbances to vision, great and small, is now only accepted in two
+cases, for squint and congenital cataract, if the latter is not operated
+on very early in the first or second year of life.</p>
+
+<p>The fact is simply this, that in congenital cataract even the most
+successful operation is frequently deceiving as to its issue without
+ophthalmoscopic report; this is the more disagreeable as the most exact
+reflection test before the operation fails to prove the existence of
+this defective sight. But does it follow from this, that congenital
+cataract has induced defective sight from want of use? We find the same
+defective vision also in congenital defective development of the
+transparent lenses (so-called luxation of the lens). On the whole, we
+often find several congenital defects in the same individual. The very
+circumstance that the cataract is congenital makes it probable that the
+defective sight is so also, or are we to take congenital cataract as
+being a guarantee against congenital amblyopia?</p>
+
+<p>Von Graefe, who first considered this defective sight to be congenital,
+designated it in his later lectures as originating from want of use,
+probably in order to advise the earliest possible performance of an
+operation. There is no mention of his having brought forward evidence
+for this assertion; that the great master himself said it was enough,
+and the host of believers felt themselves to be the happy possessors of
+a new dogma.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>A number of children appeared in my practice, in whom congenital
+cataract was needled by von Graefe in the first or second year of life
+with recovery of transparent media, who showed, however, the extremest
+degrees of defective vision when they were sufficiently intelligent to
+have their vision tested. Whoever is interested in this can find a
+number of such cases in the Royal Institution for the Blind at Steglitz,
+which I am accustomed to visit several times a year by request of the
+committee. On p. 91 I have related a case of monocular congenital
+defective sight in congenital cataract of both eyes.</p>
+
+<p>Everywhere then the principle holds good, that whoever makes an
+assertion must be prepared to verify it; amblyopia from non-use is
+denoted as an inherited trouble, and still not a single observation
+exists which furnishes proof that an eye of previously ascertained good
+visual acuteness has become amblyopic in consequence of disuse, a fact I
+drew attention to ten years ago. Leber replies to this, he remembers "to
+have seen patients with complete amblyopia in the squinting eye, who
+stated that its visual faculty had been found to be good during an
+examination instituted years before." Is this intended as an
+observation? By that I mean is it a proof of facts, for the
+trustworthiness of which he holds himself responsible: in the handling
+of scientific questions I do not place the least reliance on the dim
+recollections of unnamed individuals. Even in personally conducted
+examinations we must be on our guard to avoid mistakes, and now we are
+confronted with mere recollections of tests of vision!</p>
+
+<p>By means of the above observations the theory that "the peculiar variety
+of monocular amblyopia which is so frequent in monocular squint is
+hardly observed without squint" is sufficiently disproved.</p>
+
+<p>Leber seeks to enfeeble Alfred Graefe's statement that the presence of
+extremely defective vision may sometimes be proved at a very early age,
+in children who have only squinted<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span> a short time (the rapid development
+of amblyopia in consequence of the squint really appears incredible), by
+the assertion "that just at the earliest age, when the activity of the
+optic nerve is not yet sufficiently strengthened by use, the conditions
+for producing amblyopia from non-use are most favorable with complete
+exclusion of one eye," but complete exclusion of the squinting eye does
+not take place even in extremely defective sight, as can easily be seen
+by the mirror test (p. 66) I described fourteen years ago. Which
+activities of the optic nerve apparatus are strengthened then by use?
+Perhaps visual acuteness? The physiological conditions of this are only
+to be sought in the anatomical structure, and the physiological
+arrangements of the retina or the visual organs, which cannot be changed
+much by use. What we can learn from the visual act relates solely to the
+conclusions which we are able to draw from sensual impressions; but
+visual acuteness, <i>i. e.</i> the faculty for the recognition of distinct
+points, is an anatomical, physiological gift, and not a thing to be
+acquired.</p>
+
+<p>The opposing observation, that squint, even of monolateral character
+dating from earliest childhood, continued to the middle and later years
+of life, can still exist with very good visual faculty, may easily be
+explained by alternation from time to time. If that is so indeed, if
+squint begins during the presence of good visual acuteness, and nothing
+further is necessary to its maintenance than alternation from time to
+time, why should defective vision from non-use ever be developed? With
+good visual faculty on both sides alternations also occur from time to
+time.</p>
+
+<p>Still more convincing are those cases which are numerous where the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye only amounts to about 1/7 to 1/12,
+and where, on this account, there is no alternation. Were this defective
+sight acquired through non-use it must of necessity be progressive; it
+must exist in proportion<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span> to the duration of the squint. A moderate
+experience will suffice to show that this is not the case. And further,
+defective sight must continue progressive even after removal of the
+squint by operation, for by the operation nothing is changed in the
+relations of the binocular vision present in squint, which are dismissed
+with the one word, "suppression," by the advocates of defective vision
+from non-use.</p>
+
+<p>Moreover, suppression may exist for years without the slightest
+disadvantage to the visual faculty.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 32.</span>&mdash;In November, 1873, I operated on Fritz F&mdash; for a slight
+divergent squint of the left eye. Slight hypermetropia was present on
+both sides, and nearly full visual acuteness. In October, 1880,
+perfectly normal position of the eyes showed itself with the same visual
+acuity and emmetropia in both eyes; at the same time, however, the boy
+affirmed that when reading he could never see with his left eye but only
+with the right; in reality only the right visual field was perceived in
+the stereoscope.</p>
+
+<p>The second reason brought forward is, that the variety of amblyopia from
+non-use is quite a peculiar one; "it consists of a functional
+disturbance of those parts of the retina whose images belong to the
+common V. F., and are suppressed in squint in order to render vision
+distinct&mdash;the macula and the temporal and only a part of the nasal
+halves of the retina." Does this hold good for all cases of amblyopia in
+squint, or do those cases only belong to amblyopia from non-use where
+excentric fixation takes place with an inward deviating visual axis? It
+would be difficult to draw the line. I have seen a case in which the
+squinting eye possessed a visual acuteness of 5/36 together with
+excentric fixation and nystagmus; however, I attach no value to isolated
+cases. We frequently find excentric fixation with a visual acuteness of
+1/12 to 1/36. Further, those cases cannot possibly be regarded as
+results of squint, which possess unsteady oscillating fixation or
+rapidly trembling<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span> nystagmus, which occurs as soon as the squinting eye
+fixes. But this conclusion is false, even for the excentric fixation
+with visual axis deviating inwards; if it were right the angle at which
+the eye deviates inwards on fixation in convergent squint would always
+be greater than the squint angle. Those cases are, of course, more
+remarkable where this is not the case; however, on close investigation
+those cases are more frequent where the angle of deviation is about the
+same size or smaller than the squint angle, and is fixed with a part of
+the retina which undoubtedly belongs to the common visual field.</p>
+
+<p>On p. 91 I have described two cases of excentric fixation in children
+who had never squinted, and it is only necessary to take a little
+trouble to repeat the mirror test which I described, to be convinced
+that squinting eyes have not lost the power "of using those parts of the
+retina," even if they are amblyopic to an extreme degree; without the
+slightest doubt the reflection is perceived as soon as it falls on the
+retina.</p>
+
+<p>Value is attached to the improvement produced by the separate use of the
+squinting eye. According to my experience no higher visual acuity can be
+attained by use of the amblyopic eye, than that which is best detected
+by the aid of eserine in the first examination, if it is only carried
+out thoroughly enough. No doubt if we proceed otherwise, and rest
+content with whatever statements the patient likes to make, without
+giving ourselves any more trouble, we may expect the most superficial
+diagnoses to show the most astonishing therapeutic results, as, indeed,
+often happens. And now, talking of strychnine injections! When two
+celebrated ophthalmologists occupy themselves simultaneously with the
+therapeutics of strychnine, one of whom obtains the most astonishing
+results in atrophic troubles of the optic nerves, but, on the other
+hand, obtains no real improvement in "amblyopia from non-use," while the
+other can show brilliant success in the last-named form of defective
+vision, and, on the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span> other hand, none in atrophy of the optic nerves, we
+may perhaps conclude that both are right, if even really on the negative
+side, and that the circumstances are the same in the tests of vision.
+Again, we must examine more closely some of the cases, in which
+strychnine injections showed a brilliant result. (Anyone interested in
+the original work can read up the 'Vienna Weekly Medical News' for the
+year 1873.)</p>
+
+<p>"1. Wilhelm H&mdash;, a strong healthy boy, &aelig;t. 12, complains of defective
+vision. Right eye has nothing abnormal in its outward appearance, and
+just as little in the fundus. V. 16/100, H. 2&middot;5 D., Snellen IV-I/II; is
+the smallest type he reads at 3 to 7 inches. With + 10, I-I/II is read
+at 4 to 6 inches. Left eye V. 16/70. H. 2&middot;75 D. II-I smallest type
+legible at 3 to 12 inches. With + 4 D. I-I/II is read at 4 to 6 inches.
+On March 14th, 1872, first injection of strychnine with 0&middot;002 gr. in the
+temples. An hour later V. of right eye 16/70, left unchanged. On March
+23rd, 1872, after one injection daily, V. of each eye is 16/50."</p>
+
+<p>Patient shows then in the right eye visual acuity 16/100, with manifest
+hypermetropia 2&middot;5 D.; in all probability the total hypermetropia really
+present was higher, and was scarcely corrected by means of convex 4 D.
+If the patient now reads No. I-I/II Snellen with + 4 D. at 6 inches,
+this proves a visual acuity of 1/3 during the first investigation before
+the strychnine injection, and shows that the estimate of 16/100 was
+inaccurate. At the close of the treatment, only a visual acuity of 16/50
+(almost exactly 1/3) is specified for distance. The result seems to me,
+then, to be this, that the patient during repeated examinations has
+gradually learned to make more accurate statements, indeed, with a boy
+twelve years old one can scarcely expect it to be otherwise.</p>
+
+<p>"4. Paul A&mdash;, &aelig;t. 18, was operated on ten years ago for internal squint
+of the right eye, and dismissed with + 2 D. for distance, and + 6&middot;6 D.
+for near use. He now complains<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span> of decrease of his visual acuity. The
+eyes are normal externally and internally. Hyperopic formation in a high
+degree. Right eye V. 1/20, with and without convex glasses, without
+glass only VIII-I/II with difficulty, with + 6 V-I/II the smallest. Left
+eye appears emmetropic, but is decidedly hyperopic. V. 5/4. Glasses are
+rejected; I-I/II is read fluently at 6 to 12 inches. After one injection
+the right eye recognises III-I/II with + 6, after the second II-I/II,
+after the eighteenth I-I/II with difficulty. The visual acuity, however,
+remains at 1/20, and is not changed after six months, although latterly
+patient daily practised with + 3 D."</p>
+
+<p>Visual acuity of 1/20 suffices to read III-I/II at 2&middot;5 inches, II-I/II
+at 1&middot;5 inches, and I-I/II at about 1 inch; clear, retinal images are
+then scarcely obtainable, but we know what hypermetropes can do in that
+case; besides this, if the patient is examined for weeks by Snellen's
+method, he may get so far as to realise fairly well "the strange fate of
+that man" of I-I/II, despite larger diffusion circles; in any case
+vision remained at 1/20, despite strychnine and separate use.</p>
+
+<p>In extremely defective vision little importance should be paid to the
+fact of slight diversity in the statements, as where visual acuity
+amounts only to about 1/36, or where fingers are counted at a distance
+of 1 to 2 metres, it is quite immaterial, as far as the usefulness of
+the eyes is concerned, whether fingers are counted at a half or a whole
+metre, and we ought never to forget that all conclusions which we draw
+from the state of the visual acuity, are unreliable in proportion as the
+latter is lowered. Indeed, on repeated examination of such cases we
+frequently find considerable fluctuation in the statements of the
+patients, therefore we ought not to expect accurate statements for very
+inexact sensual impressions.</p>
+
+<p>By separate use, even in extremely defective vision, no improvement in
+visual acuteness is developed, but only a more<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span> complete acquirement of
+the power of deducing right conclusions from imperfect sensual
+impressions. That which has been most unscientifically designated as
+"suppression of diffusion circles," depends solely on this method of
+use. As with indistinct retinal images so with facial impressions which
+are insufficient, one can never learn to recognise larger objects
+aright.</p>
+
+<p>We must never forget that vision is a conclusive act acquired by
+practice; whoever sees well with one eye, and is weak sighted with the
+other, acquires this end only for the sensual impressions of the better
+eye, and must first collect experience for the defective eye, before he
+can use it.</p>
+
+<p>Leber has recently joined those cases which are described as blindness
+through blepharospasm, to amblyopia from disuse. First, I wish to
+observe that blepharospasm is not a necessary cause; I have seen the
+same disturbance of vision follow severe double blenorrh&oelig;a, which
+destroyed one eye but left the other uninjured. These children are
+always of an age which renders any trial of vision impossible, and we
+are therefore obliged to draw conclusions as to visual power from the
+movements of the body. If children move as though they were blind, it
+need not necessarily follow that they are so in the common meaning of
+the word. The art of vision is a difficult one, the acquisition of which
+begins with the earliest days of life; we do not call every person blind
+who does not see what is before his eyes, because he does not understand
+how to see it. A child who has only imperfectly learnt the conclusive
+act of vision, and forgotten it again during a continued disuse of both
+eyes, will not know how to use perfect visual acuity, and will move like
+a blind person till he again learns to estimate the relations between
+his retinal images and the things of the material world, which happens
+in a very short time.</p>
+
+<p>After this digression let us turn again to amblyopia from disuse, and to
+the last trump which is played for it. "Those<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span> cases are very remarkable
+where an immediate improvement occurs after tenotomy in amblyopia of
+high degree, which according to this is certainly produced and
+maintained by the squint." As proof a case is cited by Knapp, who
+describes it in the following words:&mdash;"The improvement in visual power
+varied very much. In many cases it was indefinable, in others very
+pronounced; for example, in one case, where it was very great before the
+operation, only No. 16 Jaeger could be read at 1 inch, while after it
+No. 2 was read at 8 to 9 inches."</p>
+
+<p>And we are to believe wonders on the strength of this scanty
+communication! It is an every-day experience that a person who squints,
+who has just asserted his inability to read the largest type,
+immediately afterwards reads smaller and the smallest type, and it would
+at least first have to be determined that all endeavours to produce a
+better visual result before tenotomy were unsuccessful; but as the
+communication stands, the conclusion as to the effect of tenotomy is
+quite a superficial <i>post hoc ergo propter hoc</i>. Moreover, I had this
+case in view when I spoke on this matter in the first edition of my
+'Handbook:'&mdash;"The frequently repeated assertion that a considerable
+improvement of vision may occur as a direct result of tenotomy, is so
+little in accordance with all the laws of physiology, that inquiries
+must be instituted <i>ad hoc</i>, and carried out with the most perfect
+exactitude. Only trials of vision which are carefully carried out and
+repeated several times before the operation, and which have regard to
+visual acuteness for distance as well as for near objects, the latter
+indeed by the aid of convex glasses or Calabar extract, can be
+recognised as proving anything in face of such a perfectly improbable
+assertion. In the course of examinations so instituted I have not myself
+found that tenotomy exercises any direct influence on visual acuity."</p>
+
+<p>I would not have given so much space to this explanation had not a
+principle been in question. The occurrence of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span> amblyopia as a result of
+non-use has been deductively constructed and is not inductively proved
+by observation. It is just an article of faith, and in science we cannot
+rely on such things; we must not depart from the inductive method.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span></p>
+<h2>ON THE CURE OF SQUINT.</h2>
+
+
+<p>Therapeutic investigations have their safest and most instructive basis
+in observation of the course of a disease as it appears without
+complications, and with no unusual symptoms; we can only arrive at a
+certain decision as to the extent of our therapeutics when we know
+exactly what will happen without skilled assistance. When squint is once
+present it is seldom complicated by fresh symptoms; on the other hand,
+spontaneous cures unquestionably take place. We must certainly not rely
+simply on the statements of patients themselves. On p. 1 we have seen
+what mistakes occur, even when it is a question of whether squint is
+present or not. How little such vague statements are worth is seen by
+the fact, that the question as to the direction of the previous squint
+very seldom finds a satisfactory answer; as a rule it is impossible to
+determine whether periodic or permanent squint has been present.</p>
+
+<p>If we undertake the task of converting the statements of patients as to
+previous squint into observations, in order to confirm the statements
+from the objective material, we must first prove whether the squint
+cannot by some means be still produced (by excluding the eye or by
+raising or lowering the eyes). Thus the condition of binocular vision
+offers us valuable guides. If we find that binocular fusion does not
+exist with available power of vision on both sides, but that the same
+conditions of sight appear in the eyes as we have learnt to attribute to
+squint, there is no reason for doubting the statements about a
+previously existing squint. It is otherwise<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span> in those cases of extreme
+amblyopia where normal binocular vision is never expected, or at least
+cannot be proved on account of the enormous difference between the two
+eyes.</p>
+
+<p>If we discover the existence of normal binocular fusion, squint may
+nevertheless have been present at a former time, for in many cases, of
+periodic squint particularly, the habit of binocular fusion is never
+quite lost.</p>
+
+<p>That squint can disappear of itself is unquestionable; how often this
+happens it is difficult to say. The fact that in ophthalmic practice we
+see many more squinting children than adults is best explained by
+this,&mdash;that squinting children are brought to us by their parents, while
+adults who still squint have usually given up any desire for a cosmetic
+improvement, and only come under treatment accidentally or on account of
+other ailments; lastly, a considerable number of cases are cured by
+operation. If the squint has disappeared we only discover by accident
+that it was ever present. The fact of its previous existence may usually
+be determined by other signs more positive than mere statements from
+memory; with reference, however, to the age at which the spontaneous
+cure takes place we are left to depend almost entirely on the patient's
+statement. As far as I have been able to determine, the period from the
+ninth or tenth up to the sixteenth year seems to offer the most
+favorable conditions.</p>
+
+<p>We rarely have an opportunity of watching the disappearance of squint,
+still I have observed two cases in which a permanent convergent squint
+disappeared after about a year. In both cases the squint had arisen in
+young people (of eight and nineteen years of age) in the course of
+irido-choroiditis which terminated in blindness, and disappeared with
+the sight. The fixing eye was emmetropic in one case, in the other the
+condition of error could not be determined owing to nebul&aelig; of the
+cornea.</p>
+
+<p>We more frequently see periodic squint disappear.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 33.</span>&mdash;M&mdash;, a boy &aelig;t. 10, was first examined by me in April, 1873;
+the right eye has hypermetropia 4&middot;5 D., and almost full visual
+acuteness, the left has convergent squint, and recognises No. 6-1/2
+(Snellen) with convex 10 D.; V. = 1/18 at 1 metre. (The boy's father
+also squints with the left eye, which is amblyopic to a high degree (V.
+= 1/36), right eye has emmetropia, and full visual acuteness). The
+prescribed spectacles (convex, 4&middot;5 D.) were used for working, but not
+continually; still three years later, in 1877, the deviation was
+considerably less and only occurred occasionally. In March, 1880,
+nothing more was seen of the squint, only slight convergence still
+recurred on excluding the left eye. Patient now wears convex 4&middot;5 D.
+constantly.</p>
+
+<p>On account of the importance which the disappearance of squint possesses
+in hypermetropia I will describe a few more cases which belong here.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 34.</span>&mdash;Mrs. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 32, has on the left H. 1&middot;5 D., V. 5/9; on the
+right H. 1&middot;5 D., V. 5/12, binocular vision (H. =&middot;75 D., V. = 5/6 to
+5/9). Asthenopic troubles are the cause of her present complaint. She
+says she squinted with the right eye as a child till her eighth or ninth
+year; the present position of the eyes is quite normal; ordinary type is
+read at the usual distance with normal fixation without glasses.
+Particularly keen fixation is rarely followed by squint, which may be
+produced by excluding the right eye; the latter then deviates about 5
+mm. inwards and slightly upwards; the secondary deviation of the left
+eye is rather less. Only the left visual field is seen in the
+stereoscope.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 35.</span>&mdash;Mrs. W&mdash;, &aelig;t. 31, has on the right H. 3&middot;5 D., V. 5/9, on the
+left V. = 1/16 with + 4 D., single words of No. 0&middot;8 are read (mother and
+aunt have also congenital weak sight in this eye). Position and movement
+of the eyes are perfectly normal, exclusion of the left eye is followed
+by slight relative divergence. In answer to my question whether she had
+not<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span> previously squinted, patient replied that she did not know, it had
+always been a matter of dispute in her family; as, however, only the
+right visual field was seen in the stereoscope, we may be sure that
+squint had been present and that binocular fusion had been lost in
+consequence.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 36.</span>&mdash;Mrs. G&mdash;, &aelig;t. 49, report in March, 1876: On the right H. 3 D.,
+V. 10/10, on the left H. 4 D., V. 10/40; a previously existing squint
+had disappeared of itself; the position of the eyes appears perfectly
+normal, but binocular fusion is not present; with red glass before one
+eye and a prism deviating in a vertical direction before the other,
+patient does not see double, but first with one eye and then with the
+other. The squint as well as its disappearance occurred however, at a
+time when it would have been regarded as an error to allow children to
+use convex glasses.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 37.</span>&mdash;Miss H&mdash;, governess, &aelig;t. about 30, came under treatment for
+asthenopic disorders; on both sides hypermetropia 2&middot;5 D., visual
+acuteness 5/18. She owns to have squinted as a child,&mdash;it had often been
+remarked when she was at school. The squint gradually disappeared, but
+still occurred sometimes on keen fixation. The usual position of the
+eyes appears perfectly normal, and gives no suspicion of squint;
+convergence occurs on exclusion, sometimes with downward deviation of
+the right eye. With the aid of a red glass changing fixation is easily
+produced even without prisms, but never diplopia. At first only the left
+visual field was seen with the stereoscope; then the right on exclusion
+of the left eye; never both at the same time. According to this the
+condition of binocular vision speaks entirely for the fact, that squint
+had existed long enough to prevent the development of a normal binocular
+visual act, and the squint had disappeared without the help of convex
+glasses in spite of the hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 38.</span>&mdash;Bertha W&mdash;, &aelig;t. 18, reads with the naked eye on the right No.
+0&middot;75 at 10 cm., on the left only 1&middot;75 at the same<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span> distance;
+hypermetropia of 6 D. is detected with the ophthalmoscope, with + 5&middot;5
+the visual acuteness of the right eye amounts at 1 metre to 1/9 (if the
+test-letters had contained No. 8 or 7&middot;5, that would probably have been
+recognised also), on the left with + 5&middot;5 D., V. = 1/12, with + 6 D. No.
+0&middot;8 is read with difficulty. Patient admits to have squinted as a child;
+no squint is present now; binocular fusion can be detected with prisms
+and she only squints now and then on the left side to assist vision,
+with which, patient states without being questioned, diplopia is
+combined. Spectacles have not been used till now.</p>
+
+<p>I could cite several more such cases, but they would prove no more than
+these. At any rate the fact is settled that squint can disappear
+spontaneously, and without the aid of convex glasses even in high
+degrees of hypermetropia.</p>
+
+<p>Wecker's announcement that "this spontaneous cure goes hand in hand with
+the progressive decrease of the accommodation, and depends on the fact
+that the squinter, on the strength of this progressive decrease,
+renounces more and more the aid which he finds in the increased
+convergence during the act of accommodation," only proves to how great
+an extent one may be prejudiced by theories. A limitation of the
+accommodation must necessarily increase the claims which are made on it,
+and can only afford inducement for calling forth all the help possible
+to support the accommodation.</p>
+
+<p>The fact that squint spontaneously disappears after normal binocular
+fusion is completely and permanently lost, and in individuals who
+accommodate without the occurrence of a too strong convergence,
+notwithstanding their hypermetropia and without the help of the
+controlling influence of binocular single vision, seems to me quite
+irreconcilable with Donders' theory. Every motive for the same,
+hypermetropia, difference of refraction, monocular defective vision,
+&amp;c., may not only be present without the occurrence of squint, they do
+not even prevent the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span> spontaneous recurrence of a squint already cured.
+Of course I will not affirm that the causes made so prominent by Donders
+exercise no influence on the origin of squint, but will only emphasize
+the fact, that other causes exist which possess a greater influence, and
+which we can find only in the ocular muscles.</p>
+
+<p>We have no experience as to whether this spontaneous cure occurs in
+myopia with divergent squint. This is not to be wondered at, as
+hypermetropia is present in the great majority of cases of squint, and
+the observations as to spontaneous cure are also rare in these. But I
+can vouch for one case where a slight absolute divergent squint, with
+crossed diplopia, which I treated shortly after its origin in a youthful
+myope, with prismatic spectacles, soon disappeared, and remained
+permanently cured.</p>
+
+<p>The inclination to preponderance of the interni appears to be peculiar
+to youth, while later on circumstances change in favour of the externi,
+and that seems to me the chief ground for the spontaneous cure of
+convergent squint. The cure is not always complete; deviation still
+occurs on exclusion, or on particularly keen fixation; sometimes,
+however, also under conditions which can only be put down to a change in
+the elastic tensions of the muscles. The following is an interesting
+illustration of this:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 39.</span>&mdash;Miss S&mdash;, &aelig;t. 20, states that she squinted frequently as a
+child from her fifth to her tenth year; the squint gradually
+disappeared, but returned again from time to time during the last half
+year without apparent cause. The examination showed normal position of
+the eyes, slight convergence only on exclusion. Visual acuteness on the
+right 5/6, with atropine ophthalmoscopic and functional emmetropia, the
+visual acuteness is lowered to 5/12 by convex 1 D.; on the left
+hypermetropia 7 D., visual acuteness 5/18; the same degree of
+hypermetropia is found with the ophthalmoscope.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Crossed diplopia with a difference in height is distinguished with the
+aid of a red glass, the difference being corrected by a prism of 4&deg;,
+with the base downwards before the right eye; a prism of 4&deg; with the
+base inwards suffices to place the double images immediately above one
+another. Spontaneous diplopia does not take place; only the right visual
+field is seen in the stereoscope. As patient lived in Brandenburg and
+only came to consult me occasionally I never had an opportunity of
+seeing the squint till she decided to stay here for some time. It was
+then seen that a peculiar oscillating deviation of the left eye of about
+4 mm. inwards often occurred. As the previous spontaneous disappearance
+of the squint and the crossed diplopia made one fear that tenotomy of
+the internus might be followed by divergence, instillations were used in
+order to make a more exact measurement of the deviation,&mdash;by this means
+the condition was so improved in the course of a few weeks, that
+deviation no longer occurred even on exclusion of the right eye.</p>
+
+<p>The spontaneous cure of squint may, however, be quite complete; indeed I
+have seen one case where convergent squint became divergent.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 40.</span>&mdash;A young lady, slightly over twenty years of age, showed on the
+right M. &middot;75 D., V = 10/10, on the left H. 1&middot;5 D., V. 10/40 to 10/30,
+and slight divergent squint on the left side. Crossed diplopia could be
+produced with a red glass, tenotomy of the left abducens sufficed to
+correct it. I had not concealed my doubts as to her statement that she
+had previously squinted inwards, but they were quite dispelled by a
+photograph taken about twelve years before, in which decided right
+convergent squint could not be mistaken. There is something to be said
+for the fact that it may have been a periodic squint, which occurred
+during the taking of the picture, as the photographer would have taken
+pains to hide a permanent squint in some way.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Conscious suppression of squint happens now and then, although very
+rarely.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 41.</span>&mdash;Miss A. L&mdash;, &aelig;t. 27, is stated to have commenced to squint in
+her first year, until at the age of eighteen she took pains to cure the
+habit, and with perfect success as far as regards the position of the
+eyes; the only disagreeable symptom was that she could no longer read
+with the naked eye. Spectacles were therefore prescribed for her, convex
+5 D., but even they did not quite remove the trouble in reading; it was
+now a disagreeable, painful sensation to have recourse to squint in
+order to see more clearly. It was easiest to read with greatly lowered
+field of vision and with the help of a convex eyeglass as well as the
+spectacles. During the examination I found on the right hypermetropia
+5&middot;5 D., visual acuteness 5/12 to 5/9, on the left with + 5&middot;5 D., V =
+1/12. With convex 6 D. No. 0&middot;5 was read at 12 inches from the glass, but
+not nearer, with normal fixation on both sides. The binocular near point
+(if we may employ this expression in the absence of normal binocular
+fusion) was considerably removed without the existence of paresis of the
+accommodation, despite the over-correction of the hypermetropia. It was
+rather a question of the same disposition of the relative amplitude of
+accommodation as I have previously described in a similar case. By
+methodical practice of binocular vision, I had taught an intelligent boy
+to fix binocularly, not only for distance, but also for near objects,
+but here again the relative amplitude for accommodation was diminished,
+so that with correct binocular fixation he could only read with convex
+glasses, which greatly over-corrected the hypermetropia. Finally, the
+normal amplitude of accommodation was restored by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, and when I saw the patient twelve years later I was
+able to satisfy myself that both were perfectly preserved. In the case
+of Miss L&mdash;, I believed I ought to give up all thoughts of an operation;
+the position of the eyes could not be improved,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span> convex 5&middot;5 D. eyeglass
+perfectly sufficed for distance, and convex 7 D. spectacles for reading.
+It seemed to me senseless to perform tenotomy merely to enable her to
+use the same glass for distance and for near objects, without any
+possibility of a cosmetic improvement. Moreover the condition of
+binocular vision quite confirmed the statements as to the previous
+squint. Diplopia could only be produced now and then with the help of
+prisms and red glass, at first the right visual field only was seen in
+the stereoscope, on closer observation also the left, but without
+binocular fusion.</p>
+
+<p>Besides, the proved decrease of the relative power of accommodation in
+both these cases, marked by a voluntary suppression of the squint, does
+not appear in those cases where squint disappears of itself, the state
+of the accommodation, therefore, shows nothing unusual.</p>
+
+<p>The spontaneous cure of squint teaches us two important facts, firstly,
+that the conditions of tension of the ocular muscles may change in the
+course of time, and secondly, that normal binocular fusion of the
+retinal images is not necessary for a correct position of the eyes;
+neither the spontaneous nor the operative cure of squint presupposes the
+presence or the restoration of a normal binocular fusion. If this were
+the case the operation for squint would not be of much use.</p>
+
+<p>Observation of these cases further teaches, that treatment with convex
+glasses has prospects of success, particularly in periodic squint with
+hypermetropia, if squint can disappear spontaneously even without
+correction of the hypermetropia. At the same time, however, it appears
+that we need not form hasty conclusions about it. Periodic squint
+frequently arises during the earliest years of life, and everyone
+(perhaps with the exception of a few ophthalmologists) will at once
+reject the idea of allowing children of two to three years old to wear
+spectacles; constant wearing of spectacles even by older children seems
+to me not to be without risk as long as there<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span> is any chance of their
+falling when running, playing, &amp;c., in which case the eyes as well as
+the spectacles would be in danger. As a rule I only order children to
+wear convex spectacles when they are distinctly indicated, and then only
+during sedentary occupations, when working and eating. Of course,
+exceptions may be made according to the individuality of the child, and
+the care with which it is looked after at home.</p>
+
+<p>We are more rarely able to remove permanent convergent squint by means
+of convex glasses than the periodic form; that it is possible, however,
+I should like to show by an account of a patient, who offers, besides,
+other interesting peculiarities.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 42.</span>&mdash;Marie S&mdash;, &aelig;t. 6, came under treatment on November 28th, 1878,
+for recent superficial marginal keratitis of the left eye, which was
+treated first with atropine; a few days later slight blepharitis
+appeared also. On December 9th, atropine was discontinued; on the 14th,
+the position of the eyes was still quite normal; on the 19th, permanent
+convergent squint of the left eye was present. Squint had never been
+observed in the child before. Double images were voluntarily announced
+without my having inquired for them, they were homonymous and moved
+further apart at both sides of the visual field. On December 28th, the
+squint still remained the same, the double images were, however,
+scarcely noticed by the child, so quickly do the relations of the
+corresponding points of the retina change even in the sixth year. Both
+eyes were atropinised for the better determination of the error, when a
+slight degree of hypermetropia was shown by the ophthalmoscope, at most
+1&middot;5 D.; certainly a higher degree was specified when the vision was
+tested, namely, on the right H. 2&middot;5 D., V. = 5/12 to 5/9, on the left H.
+1&middot;75 D., V. = 5/18, probably, however, the objective determination was
+more exact than the child's statements. If a child of six knows its
+letters and figures sufficiently well to undergo a visual test, that is
+as much as we can expect; in any case, however, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span> forms of the
+letters and figures which we use for the visual test are not easy to
+children, and the more objective the way in which the child comprehends
+the examination, the less it perplexes itself by guesses, but only names
+the letters which it really distinctly recognises, the less deficient
+are the reports as to the visual acuteness; the proportionately larger
+retinal images are still recognised, even if they are no longer quite
+distinct, but consist of diffusion circles as a result of
+over-correction of the hypermetropia. That these observations were right
+for the case in point, is seen by the fact that eight days later, after
+the effects of the atropine had passed off, the child could see better
+with the naked eyes than with convex glasses, and that finally, when it
+had become accustomed to the forms of the letters and figures employed,
+V. = 5/9 was announced on the right, and V. = 5/12 on the left.</p>
+
+<p>Mydriasis by atropine had no influence whatever on the squint,
+therefore, on December 31st, convex spectacles 2 D. were prescribed for
+permanent use. On January 4th, the linear deviation still amounted to 4
+mm.; on January 15th, convergence was no longer discernible for
+distance, with red glass double images occurred at once; on January
+21st, no squint was present, and binocular fusion was again restored;
+prisms immediately caused double images, the facultative divergence was
+= 0. I thought it prudent to order the spectacles to be worn till the
+middle of March, when they were discontinued; squint has not appeared
+since then.</p>
+
+<p>In this case it is impossible to determine what really induced the
+squint, certainly not the slight hypermetropia, for the child had
+already learnt to read without squinting, and was spared any exertion at
+the time when the squint arose. Neither can we look for the cause in the
+inflammatory condition for which the child first came under treatment,
+this was as good as removed before the squint began and no exciting
+condition worth naming was present. Moreover, most cases of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span> squint
+arise without directly assignable causes. It seems to me unquestionable
+that the permanent use of convex glasses made the pathological relation
+between accommodation and convergence normal, before it had firmly
+established itself, and before the muscular relations were definitely
+changed, and that the squint was really thus cured. But if the child had
+not been under treatment I should scarcely have seen the squint so soon
+after its first occurrence, and most cases of squint arise at an age
+which forbids the permanent wearing of spectacles.</p>
+
+<p>If permanent squint has already existed for a long time, nothing can be
+hoped for from the use of convex glasses; for the conditions of the
+muscles are then so much changed, that they are no longer influenced by
+such weak physiological powers. I have been able to convince myself in
+the case of several squinting persons, who conscientiously wore the
+spectacles prescribed for them elsewhere, that the squint was concealed
+by this means; that may suffice in some cases, but if it is a question
+of young girls we may well ask, which is to be preferred for appearance
+sake, squint or spectacles.</p>
+
+<p>Tenotomy effects essentially a cosmetic improvement&mdash;its object is to
+restore the correct position of the eyes by equalising the elastic
+muscular tensions. The means at our disposal are, the simple separation
+of the tendon of the too-tense muscle from the sclerotic, the
+distribution of the operation between both eyes, and finally, increasing
+the strength of the antagonist by moving forwards its insertion.</p>
+
+<p>The method of tenotomy as I carry it out is as follows: The conjunctiva
+is seized with fine forceps exactly over the insertion of the muscle to
+be divided, and the fold thus raised cut into with the smallest possible
+wound. Provided we operate on the right spot we enter this opening with
+the forceps and immediately seize the tendon close to its insertion on
+the sclerotic, which is drawn forwards, as was the conjunctiva, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span>
+loosened with flat, curved scissors, the points of which must be rounded
+off. The incision must only be large enough to allow a small hook with a
+knob to be inserted through it and behind the insertion of the tendon,
+which is now lifted up and divided with fine pointed scissors close to
+its insertion into the sclerotic. It is important to make sure that a
+few threads coming off from the tendon at the ends of the insertion do
+not remain uncut; we can only consider the operation to be complete when
+the hook, carried behind the edge of the insertion made clearly visible
+by the foregoing proceeding, slides up to the margin of the cornea
+without any interruption.</p>
+
+<p>The method of performing advancement is as follows: An incision is made
+in the conjunctiva over the tendon of the muscle to be brought forward
+and just at the outer bend of the latter, then loosened together with
+the subconjunctival tissue to the corneal margin; it is desirable to
+carry out this loosening close to the sclerotic, as the flap of the
+conjunctiva thus formed must afford sufficient support to the muscle to
+be brought forward. Then the capsule of Tenon is cut into at one edge of
+the insertion, a flat, curved, blunt hook without a knob is carried
+between muscle and sclerotic, and out again at the other edge of the
+insertion. We must be careful to get the muscle as clean as possible on
+the hook in the whole width of its insertion, that is without the
+capsule of Tenon, for the suture put in ought only to enclose the
+muscle, without at the same time dragging the capsule of Tenon. For the
+suture I always use fine catgut which is provided at both ends with
+curved needles; needles of slightly different form may be chosen in
+order that the threads may be easily distinguished from one another. A
+needle is carried behind the hook from each thread, one through the
+upper, the other through the lower edge of the muscle, between it and
+the sclerotic, then the thread is tied in a knot on the muscle to make
+sure that it does not slip back through the loop of the thread after
+its<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span> separation from the sclerotic. Then the threads are knotted on the
+muscle, and the insertion is separated from the sclerotic. As the edge
+of the insertion is now exposed we can see how the land lies, and can
+carry the threads exactly in the direction of the muscle under the
+conjunctiva to the corneal margin, where they are passed through, and
+ends tied in a knot. By this means the muscle is drawn forwards
+precisely in its normal direction and stretched tighter. The wound in
+the conjunctiva is closed by a suture.</p>
+
+<p>It is desirable to slightly stretch the muscle that is to be brought
+forward in both the above operations while the eye is rolled towards the
+opposite side with forceps. Further, as I always operate under
+chloroform, I dispense with the usual test of the immediate effect of
+the operation; such tests have no value before the effects of the
+narcotic have completely disappeared, and one must be sure in the way
+above described that no single fibres are left undivided. I lay special
+stress on the fact that the operation is so performed, that it is able
+to bring about the desired mechanical effect.</p>
+
+<p>The immediate mechanical effects of simple tenotomy may be easily
+deduced; the divided muscle retracts as far as its elasticity and its
+relations with the surrounding tissues permit. With reference to the
+internal and external rectus with which strabotomy specially has to do,
+those relations come principally under observation which the front part
+of the muscle enters into with the conjunctival tissues; the greater the
+extent to which we loosen these relations, the farther the muscle can
+retract. If it is a question of obtaining a greater effect, I am
+accustomed to loosen the subconjunctival tissue at the front part of the
+muscle behind the lachrymal caruncle to a greater extent&mdash;this offers
+the additional advantage that the distorting sinking in of the caruncle
+is avoided.</p>
+
+<p>By dividing one rectus its antagonist gains in proportion and rolls the
+eye towards it as far as its own elastic tension<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span> and the powers still
+present on the other side permit. The improvement in position which we
+strive to obtain is brought about by the elastic power of the
+antagonist, and not by the tenotomy itself, and it is seen by this then,
+that the term strabotomy simply, does not quite express the
+circumstances of the case. Tenotomy is nothing more than the means for
+procuring a preponderance of the elastic power of the antagonist,
+therefore the effect attainable on the position of the eye does not
+depend solely on the division of the muscle, but to a great extent on
+the elasticity of the antagonist, and may be nullified at once, if the
+antagonist does not perform what we expect from it, and that may happen
+without our being able to foresee it. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 43.</span>&mdash;Julie B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 21, is stated to have squinted inwards since
+her third year, principally with the right eye, but with occasional
+alternation. The deviation amounts to 5 mm., the outward movement of
+both eyes is perfectly normal. Hypermetropia 2 D., visual acuteness 5/18
+on both sides. Ophthalmoscopically with atropine the same degree of
+hypermetropia. Tenotomy of both interni on March 7th, 1879. On March
+14th, deviation 5 mm., just as before. Then renewed division of the
+internal rectus and shortening of the external rectus of the right eye;
+but still the result was insufficient. Therefore, on March 21st, the
+left eye was dealt with in the same way. By this means a normal position
+of the eye was obtained, which was perfectly preserved when I saw the
+patient again a year and a half later. Everything led me to suppose
+beforehand that simple tenotomy of both internal recti would perfectly
+suffice to remove the squint, yet it was of no use, but had to be
+supplemented by shortening both external recti. In such cases I would
+not advise repeated tenotomies, but for the correction of the
+insufficient result as soon as possible by advancement of the
+antagonist.</p>
+
+<p>Advancement very frequently gives us an opportunity of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span> seeing with our
+own eyes the insufficiency of the antagonist and its faulty anatomical
+development. We may suppose this to be the case if the mobility towards
+the side of the antagonist is faulty, however that is no proof;
+considerable insufficiency may co-exist with perfectly normal mobility.
+If limitation of movement is present, to which insufficiency of the
+antagonist may be assigned as the cause, or if it is desirable to obtain
+the greatest possible result by means of an operation on the squinting
+eye, we must combine tenotomy of the deviating muscle with advancement
+of the antagonist. The same is stretched tighter, and rolls the eye more
+strongly to its side, and we can regulate the degree of shortening of
+the muscle, by the distance behind the insertion at which we place the
+threads in the muscle, also by the distance from the corneal margin at
+which we place our anterior sutures, although the rapidly increasing
+ductility of the conjunctiva makes it desirable that we should not go
+far from the corneal margin.</p>
+
+<p>The exact rules for the application of the methods of operation differ
+according to the nature of the case under consideration. If we
+contemplate first the largest group, that of the ordinary permanent
+convergent squint, the choice of the method is principally determined by
+the average degree of deviation, the condition of error, and the visual
+power, lastly by the mobility, particularly the outward movement of the
+eyes. If the visual power of both eyes is nearly the same, or if the
+squinting eye possesses such a visual acuteness that it can be used in
+fixation, it is advisable as a rule to arrange the relations of the
+muscles as equally as possible in both eyes&mdash;simple division of the
+internal recti is therefore, as a rule, to be performed in both eyes.
+If, on the other hand, the vision of the squinting eye is in a high
+degree defective, so that only the better one is used, it is generally
+advisable to confine the operation as far as possible to the squinting
+eye; in that case, tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement of
+the external<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span> rectus is usually indicated in the squinting eye, and
+frequently suffices.</p>
+
+<p>Deviations which are so slight, that the careful division of both
+interni without loosening the conjunctiva at the front part of the
+muscle makes us fear an excessive result, are seldom the subject of
+operative treatment; if the deviation is slight but still a
+disfigurement, if it amounts to 3 to 4 mm., distribution between both
+eyes is suitable, because, when the squinting eye possesses requisite
+visual acuteness it is put into fixation more frequently after the
+operation than before. Under these circumstances, if the operation is
+confined to the squinting eye, and a sufficient result is thereby
+obtained, as soon as this eye is used for fixation a remarkable
+secondary deviation of the other eye occurs, which is not the case if
+the tensions of the muscles have been balanced by an operation on both
+sides.</p>
+
+<p>A deviation of 5 to 6 mm. may usually be balanced by means of simple
+double tenotomy if the conjunctiva is considerably loosened behind the
+caruncle; not unfrequently, however, we must be careful to strengthen
+the result by means of the after-treatment. Commonly, during the first
+twenty-four hours, the result appears to be quite satisfactory, whilst
+on the second or third day troublesome convergence again sets in. By
+practice of the outward movement we then usually obtain at once a
+perceptible improvement of the position. Both eyes are repeatedly turned
+as far as possible to the right and left, by which means is obtained on
+the one hand, exercise of the external recti, on the other, increase of
+the effect of the tenotomy of the internal recti. I order these
+exercises to be begun on the day after the operation.</p>
+
+<p>Besides this, however, in the relation between accommodation and
+convergence of the visual axes there is a very essential cause which is
+able to lessen the immediate effect of the operation. Persons who squint
+inwards, even if emmetropic, have the habit of combining accommodation
+for near objects with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span> excessive convergence of the visual axes, thus
+the immediate effect of the operation is diminished as soon as they
+begin to use their eyes again. This happens, not by a lessening of the
+effect of the tenotomy, which could, indeed, only be increased by
+exertion of the internal recti, but in that sufficient time is not given
+for the external rectus to regain its normal elastic tension. Nothing is
+changed at first by the operation in the customary relation between
+accommodation and innervation of the internal recti&mdash;it is a question,
+then, of avoiding every exertion of the accommodation for some time, in
+order that no inducement for strong convergence should be given. I am
+accustomed, therefore, even in the case of emmetropes, to paralyse the
+accommodation by means of atropine twenty-four hours after the
+operation, and to remove the far-point by convex glasses to about 0&middot;70
+m.; the spectacles must, of course, be worn constantly, for only by that
+means can we be sure that they are always used for near objects. After a
+few weeks the spectacles are discontinued, first for distance, then for
+near objects also. This after-treatment is not necessary under all
+circumstances; but I have repeatedly assured myself that an originally
+sufficient result which perceptibly diminished after a few days, could
+by this means be restored and permanently maintained even in emmetropes.</p>
+
+<p>In the case of hypermetropes, we more often meet with the same
+experience; in permanent convergent squint it is by no means necessary
+to neutralise the hypermetropia permanently after the operation, but it
+happens here more often than in emmetropia, that a perfectly good
+immediate effect is lost within the first week after the operation, and
+can be restored again by permanently wearing the correcting convex
+glasses. In such cases also, I am accustomed after a few months to
+discontinue the spectacles for distance as an experiment, while they are
+still used for working.</p>
+
+<p>Simple tenotomy of both internal recti does not, as a rule,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</a></span> suffice for
+deviations of more than 7 mm.; therefore, even if both eyes possess good
+visual power, we must still decide on tenotomy of both internal recti
+together with advancement of the external rectus of the squinting eye,
+or anticipate repeated tenotomies of the internal recti, or seek to
+obtain the greatest possible effect by means of slight modification of
+the method of procedure.</p>
+
+<p>Provided that the muscle was completely divided, and sufficiently
+loosened from the conjunctiva during the first operation, a repetition
+of the tenotomy can only aim at an increase of the effect if the elastic
+tension of the antagonist has improved in the meantime. I very rarely
+therefore carry out repeated tenotomies; it seems to me much more
+desirable to obtain a sufficient result at one operation whenever that
+is possible.</p>
+
+<p>In some cases where there is a deviation of 7 to 9 mm., the effect of
+the tenotomy may be increased by inducing a strong divergence
+immediately after the tenotomy of the internal recti, which is
+maintained for 6 to 8 hours. For this a thread is passed through the
+conjunctiva at the outer edge of the cornea about 4 mm. above the
+horizontal meridian, and out again about 2 mm. below the horizontal
+meridian, then from below upwards in the same way, so that the
+conjunctiva is contained in a loop. The needle is then passed through
+the external canthus from the conjunctival surface and fastened by tying
+it over a roll of paper. This procedure is only to be recommended in
+exceptional cases; a greater effect on the internal recti is thus
+obtained, while with reference to the position the result depends on the
+elastic tension of the external rectus just as in simple tenotomy.</p>
+
+<p>If the squinting eye has only an unavailable visual acuteness, a
+combination of tenotomy of the internal rectus with shortening of the
+external rectus is the best procedure. As a rule, simple tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the squinting<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span> eye is of very little use in such
+cases, as the abducens, weakened by continual extension and wanting
+practice, places too slight an opposing power in the balance. The chief
+effect of the operation then devolves on the other solely available eye,
+which is not a desirable circumstance, and is also frequently
+insufficient. On the other hand, the combination of tenotomy of the
+internal rectus with advancement of the external rectus enables us
+successfully to change the opposing muscular tensions. As a rule, the
+operation may be confined to the squinting, weak-sighted eye, as that
+suffices to obtain a correction of 5 to 6 mm.</p>
+
+<p>If the result is seen to be insufficient, it may be supplemented by
+tenotomy of the internal rectus of the other eye; in the case of
+deviations of more than 7 mm. it is advisable to divide the operation
+between the eyes in this way.</p>
+
+<p>The suture has a special use in so-called artificial strabismus; that
+is, in those cases where convergent is converted into divergent squint
+through unskilful treatment, or where tenotomy of the abducens,
+performed on account of "insufficiency of the internal recti," is
+followed by convergent strabismus. I have not found confirmation of the
+fear expressed by Arlt, that the method proposed by me could be scarcely
+practicable if it is a case of the advancement of a muscle too far
+forward, and I have corrected a large number of such cases in other
+practices. It is seldom profitable to take up things in which others
+have been unsuccessful, but it bring its own reward in the case of
+artificial squint.</p>
+
+<p>Periodic convergent squint offers a less certain ground for the
+operation. The change between normal position and a very considerable
+squint gives rise to the fear that an operation which would be able to
+remove the convergence might finally induce divergent strabismus. This
+fear is certainly not groundless, but at the same time it must be
+remembered that, with the exception perhaps of a few cases of clearly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</a></span>
+accommodative deviation, elastic preponderance of the internal recti or
+insufficiency of the external recti is generally the cause of periodic
+squint also. I have frequently, in periodic squint, performed double
+tenotomy of the internal recti with the slightest possible loosening of
+the conjunctiva. I have also attempted to confine the operation to the
+shortening of the external rectus without loosening the internal recti
+and with success, but not frequently enough to be able to deliver a
+certain opinion upon it.</p>
+
+<p>In periodic squint, the first care must always be to determine the
+condition of refraction, if possible with atropine, and to neutralise or
+over-correct hypermetropia if present. If squint is absent during the
+use of convex glasses, which happens frequently under these
+circumstances, the operation offers no further advantages, as the
+constant use of convex glasses afterwards can hardly be avoided. If the
+periodic deviation continues to exist, the operation can be carried out
+according to the above rules and so as to cause a slight effect.</p>
+
+<p>The final result is usually attained after two to three weeks in
+convergent squint; it is better to allow a slight degree of convergence
+to exist, as divergence, however slight, existing at this time, brings
+with it the fear of a gradual increase. It happens occasionally, that
+after years, convergence asserts itself again; I have observed it in
+spontaneous (see Case 39) as well as in operative cure of squint; still,
+this is so unusual, that I should like to give an illustration of the
+latter observation on account of its rarity.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 44.</span>&mdash;Hedw. von L&mdash;, &aelig;t 10, came under treatment in April, 1874, for
+convergent squint on the left side which arose in her seventh year, with
+occasional alternation. Emmetropia, determined with atropine on both
+sides and good visual acuteness. Diplopia was present at the
+commencement of the squint. Patient can only be rendered conscious of
+double images by the help of a red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span> Double tenotomy of the internal recti effected a normal
+position, and at the end of December, 1874, the continuance of the same
+could be proved as well as binocular fusion with prisms. At the
+beginning of 1880, I was informed that from time to time periodic squint
+had occurred with diplopia. In the middle of March, I had an opportunity
+of seeing the young lady. Myopia 2 D. had meanwhile developed on both
+sides, visual acuteness almost = 1. The position of the eyes was
+perfectly good, slight convergence occurred during covering, homonymous
+double images with a red glass which, at a distance of 5 m., were joined
+by a prism of 8&deg;; stereoscopic fusion was not perfectly certain. A true
+squint could not be proved. On April 3rd, as patient stopped for a few
+hours on her journey through, a striking convergent squint of the left
+eye was seen. The deviation amounted to 4 to 5 mm. Single vision existed
+at a distance of 15 to 20 cm., then homonymous double images appeared,
+which did not correspond to the objective deviation; the double images
+were however corrected by a prism of 6&deg; (base outwards) for an object 5
+m. distant.</p>
+
+<p>We cannot conclude the consideration of the operative treatment of
+convergent squint without once more returning to the relation between
+the line of vision and the position of the cornea. The angle [Greek: a]
+still deserves mention in a few thankful words&mdash;<i>hic mihi angulus
+praeter omnes ridet</i>&mdash;it is a very useful guide in tenotomy. In tenotomy
+we may count as gain the apparent divergence which it causes in
+hypermetropes who do not squint. We obtain a perfect cosmetic result,
+while a convergence, objectively determinable, but not otherwise easily
+visible, continues to exist. It would be folly to exceed this; and for
+cases where binocular fusion does not exist, and where diplopia is not
+present, to wish to remove this covered convergence due to the angle
+[Greek: a], the cosmetic result would be impaired by it.</p>
+
+<p>Those cases where it is a question of uniting homonymous<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span> double images
+are very instructive when considering tenotomy. Only when squint arises
+after childhood (after the fifteenth year) does it cause troublesome
+diplopia, this accords naturally with the laws of normal binocular
+fusion learnt meanwhile. (On the other hand those cases, which sometimes
+occur after tenotomy, with the double images in a position which does
+not correspond to the normal physiological laws and which cannot
+therefore be united by prisms, are naturally unsuitable for the
+operative removal of diplopia.) Cases in which convergent squint is
+followed by troublesome double images, appear, with the exception of the
+hysterical form mentioned on p. 41, chiefly in myopia, more seldom in
+emmetropia, and very rarely in hypermetropia; for if the conditions
+contained in the ocular muscles are coincident with hypermetropia,
+squint usually arises in the course of childhood, before normal
+binocular vision has become a fixed habit.</p>
+
+<p>As the cases here under consideration are not very common, I will relate
+a few from which conclusions may be derived as to the effect of
+tenotomy.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 45.</span>&mdash;Miss von B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 14, came under treatment on May 1st, 1875,
+for diplopia, which made its appearance about a year previously.
+Emmetropia and full visual acuteness exist on both sides. The double
+images are homonymous and further apart on both sides of the visual
+field. At first single vision existed only to about 0&middot;75 m.; gradually,
+however, the area of single vision was extended by practice of the
+outward movement, supported by the use of prismatic spectacles, so that
+after a year patient could see singly to a great distance. This
+improvement was not maintained. At the beginning of 1879, diplopia was
+again present to a troublesome degree, particularly on looking
+downwards; on looking straight forwards the left eye showed a slight
+convergent deviation, amounting at most to 2 mm. During various
+examinations the distance of the double images was stated to be now
+less, now greater,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span> a prism of at least 5&deg;, at most of 9&deg;, was requisite
+for correction. Diplopia was at once removed by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, with very slight loosening of the conjunctiva, and has
+not appeared since.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 46.</span>&mdash;Miss A&mdash;, &aelig;t. 17, suffered from diplopia for a few weeks, a
+year and a half ago; for the last half year the diplopia is continuous,
+and striking squint is stated to be sometimes present. Myopia 2 D. on
+both sides, visual acuteness = 5/9. On fixation of an object about 4 m.
+distant, the left eye deviates inwards at most 2 mm.; homonymous double
+images, with a red glass and on correction of the myopia, which were
+united by means of prism 14&deg; at a distance of 5 m., without red glass
+(with retinal images alike on both sides) prism 8&deg; sufficed to unite
+them. If a vertically deviating prism is held before one eye, the double
+images stand just above one another when looking at an object 20 cm.
+off, on nearer approach they are crossed. On May 3rd, 1879, tenotomy of
+the left internal rectus with small conjunctival wound without loosening
+of the conjunctiva, and union of the conjunctival wound by a suture. On
+May 8th, single vision, also with correction of the myopia and with red
+glass. Facultative divergence = 2&deg;. On May 14th, with correction of the
+myopia, there was still single vision for distance; however, with red
+glass double images occurred again; and at the end of May the condition
+of the double images was just the same as before the operation. On
+vertical shifting of one visual field by a weak prism the double images
+are brought into a vertical line by means of prism 16&deg;, with the base
+outwards. Therefore, on July 1st, the right internal rectus was also
+divided, with small conjunctival wound without loosening of the
+conjunctiva and without suture. The evening after the operation slight
+divergence on covering. On July 24th, binocular single vision is
+present; with red glass homonymous double images at 5 m., corrected by
+prism 4&deg;. This time the result was final;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</a></span> for in the middle of October,
+three months after the operation, the report was exactly like the one of
+July 24th above stated.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 47.</span>&mdash;Mrs. A&mdash;, &aelig;t. 33, has suffered for six months from alternating
+convergent squint with diplopia, for a short time even a parallel
+position is still possible. On the right myopia 4 D., V. = 6/12. On the
+left myopia 4 D., V. 6/9. Single vision occurs to 22 cm., at a greater
+distance homonymous double images, whose mutual distance remains the
+same when looking to one side. On correction of the myopia a prism of at
+least 32&deg; is necessary for the union of the double images for an object
+at 4 m. Two days after tenotomy of the internal recti on both sides, the
+facultative divergence amounted to 7&deg; (at 4 m.) on correction of the
+myopia. Single vision was also present when looking strongly to one
+side, and with differentiation of one retinal image by a red glass.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 48.</span>&mdash;Mr. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 32, first observed the occurrence of diplopia at
+the beginning of April, 1877. Myopia 6 D. is present in both eyes,
+visual acuteness on the right 1/2, on the left rather more than 1/2
+(5/9). The double images are homonymous and sometimes (not always) move
+farther apart at the limits of the visual field. Patient could only
+decide after two years, in July, 1879, on the operative treatment then
+proposed. Diplopia continued to exist; single vision was only now and
+then possible for a short time. On correction of the myopia (if one eye
+is provided with a red glass) prism 12&deg; suffices for union of the double
+images. If one visual field is moved in a vertical direction by a prism
+of 5&deg; during the trial of convergence, prism 38&deg; is necessary in order
+to equalize the lateral deviation of the double images, and to place
+them perpendicularly above one another for an object 5 m. distant. On
+July 14th, tenotomy of the internal rectus of the left eye; single
+vision next day on correction of the myopia, prism 6&deg; is overcome by
+divergence; if, however, double images are produced by a vertically
+deviating prism of 5&deg; they immediately show<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</a></span> homonymous lateral
+deviation, which is corrected by prism 18&deg; at a distance of 5 m.</p>
+
+<p>Two months after the operation the diplopia was certainly better, but by
+no means removed; squint occurred periodically as before, so that
+sometimes single vision was possible at 3 to 4 m., sometimes troublesome
+diplopia was present.</p>
+
+<p>During the test of convergence with prisms deviating in a vertical
+direction, a prism of 38&deg; was necessary for the equalization of the
+lateral deviation just as before the operation. Therefore in the middle
+of October the internal rectus of the right eye was divided, and the
+conjunctiva loosened as far as the caruncle. Three days afterwards
+single vision, facultative divergence = prism 5&deg;; in the trial of
+convergence, equalization by means of prism 8&deg;. In the middle of
+October, two months after the operation, diplopia had not appeared
+again; facultative divergence = 0; homonymous double images are produced
+by a red glass before one eye, slight convergent deviation on covering
+it, which in the trial of convergence is equalized by prism 20&deg;. The
+preponderance of the interni was now so far lessened for the ordinary
+use of the eyes, that permanent binocular single vision was possible.</p>
+
+<p>Notwithstanding the small number of these cases we may conclude from
+them, that homonymous diplopia in typical convergent squint (not
+paralytic) can only be corrected occasionally by one-sided tenotomy when
+the deviation is slight. As a rule it is necessary to distribute the
+operation between the eyes. A result seems attainable by means of simple
+tenotomy on both sides, which is expressed by prism 20&deg; in the trial of
+convergence. In future cases it would be desirable to determine during
+correction of the anomalies of refraction (1) the weakest prism which is
+able to unite the double images at about 5 m. distant (without red
+glass); (2) the distance at which the double images stand apart from one
+another during the trial of convergence with prisms deviating in a
+vertical<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span> direction; and (3) the prism which brings the double images
+immediately above one another in the case of objects about 5 m. off.</p>
+
+<p>Next to the cases above discussed stand those where convergent squint
+remains after paralysis of the abducens; at the same time slightly
+defective mobility and a distinct moving apart of the double images
+towards the affected side can usually be detected. In a few such cases I
+could restrict myself to tenotomy of the internal rectus of the affected
+eye, but in those cases which I was able to attend to more particularly,
+double tenotomy was necessary, and did not always suffice. Here also the
+advancement of the external rectus is suitably applied, which I should
+like to illustrate by means of a few examples.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 49.</span>&mdash;Mr. B&mdash;, &aelig;t. 20, was seized by paralysis of the abducens of
+the right eye in November, 1877. In April, 1878, convergent squint was
+still present, and as it continued patient decided on an operation in
+February, 1879. Both eyes are emmetropic and possess full visual
+acuteness.</p>
+
+<p>Immediately before the operation the double images were united at 4 to 5
+m. in the horizontal plane by a prism of 39&deg;; towards the right their
+deviation rather increased. The measurable deviation amounted to 4 mm.
+in the right eye, the secondary deviation of the left to 5 mm. In order
+to proceed carefully, I confined myself at first to tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the right eye. After the space of a week single
+vision was present at the distance of 1 metre in the middle line and at
+the height of the eyes; at about 5 m. homonymous double images corrected
+by prism 12&deg;, together with slight difference in height (= prism 4&deg;,
+base upwards before the right eye). The area of double vision extended
+from the limit of the right visual field to about 20&deg; the other side of
+the middle line.</p>
+
+<p>This result would have sufficed perfectly for a cosmetic<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span> tenotomy where
+binocular fusion did not exist; the annoyance caused to patient by
+diplopia, however, was only slightly relieved. I decided, therefore, on
+a second operation, not without fearing an excessive result, and
+performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus with a very small
+conjunctival wound and by closing the wound by means of a suture. The
+result was by no means excessive, for it was perfectly <i>nil</i>, apparently
+even negative at first, for a few days after the operation the area of
+single vision approached the eye to less than 0&middot;5 m. and at 4 to 5 m. a
+prism of 20&deg; was requisite for correction; however, eighteen days after
+the tenotomy of the left internus everything was as before. Single
+vision to 1 m. while prism 12&deg; corrected for a distance of 4 to 5 m. The
+tenotomy then had no effect at all on the position of the eye; however,
+the restriction of movement dependent on it, asserted itself in that the
+double images were crossed on the limit of the right visual field (about
+45&deg; towards the right). On the supposition that this insufficient result
+might be caused by the suture of the conjunctival wound I decided to
+repeat the separation of the internal rectus. The agglutination of the
+muscle with the sclerotic is so slight for two to three weeks after the
+operation that the strabismus hook perfectly suffices to sever the
+connection; no suture was put in, but the result again was <i>nil</i>, and on
+the day after the operation single vision was only present to 0&middot;5 m. in
+the middle line, just as after the previous tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus. It was now clear that the result with respect to the
+position of the eye was only unsuccessful because the antagonist did not
+do its duty. I shortened the abducens (without touching the internus
+again). The immediate effect, during the chloroform narcosis, was a
+terrible divergence, but on the same evening it was less, and
+twenty-four hours after the operation with a red glass, homonymous
+double images were present close together at a distance of 4 m. Ten days
+afterwards binocular single vision was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span> insured, facultative divergence
+= 3&deg; at 4 m., crossed double images towards the limits of both visual
+fields, but only on moving the eyes in a lateral direction; no practical
+use was made of this. If one could have diagnosed beforehand the
+insufficiency of the externi assuredly present here, which was probably
+the reason for the development of squint on the healing of the paralysis
+of the abducens, one would have been able to combine shortening of the
+right abducens with tenotomy of the internus in the first operation,
+whereas the necessity for the advancement was only shown by the
+abnormally slight effect of the tenotomy on the left side. According to
+accounts received by letter the favorable result has continued.</p>
+
+<p>We obtain a result more quickly by the immediate advancement of the
+abducens. For example:</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 50.</span>&mdash;Mr. K&mdash;, &aelig;t. 29, suffered from paresis of the right abducens
+in the autumn of 1877. In December, 1878, convergent squint is present,
+linear deviation 5 mm. (scarcely more on the left than on the right).
+The defect of movement towards the side of the right abducens amounts to
+about 2 or 3 mm. Diplopia is present in the whole visual field with
+increase of the deviation towards the right. Emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness on both sides. Tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement
+of the abducens of the right eye at the end of December. Three weeks
+later single vision is present in the middle line; on the left limit of
+the visual field crossed double images, on the right side homonymous
+ones, beginning about 20&deg; from the middle line. The result was by no
+means excessive.</p>
+
+<p>In convergent squint with congenital paresis of the abducens, not much
+can be attained without shortening the abducens. Of course only the
+squint can be removed, not the paralysis, but if once a correct position
+is attained for the middle line, cosmetic demands are satisfied; the
+outward movement, which is absent, must be replaced by turning the
+head.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The chief method for absolute divergent squint is the combination of
+shortening with tenotomy of the externus. If the impulse for convergence
+is once lost, so that an associated movement occurs in place of an
+accommodative one on fixation of a point situated on the middle line, a
+removal of the squint cannot be obtained by simple tenotomy of the
+externi&mdash;another proof that a change of position of the eye is by no
+means a necessary result of tenotomy.</p>
+
+<p>Moreover, this slight aid given by tenotomy has its ground not solely in
+the condition of the opposing recti muscles. In other practices I have
+seen cases enough in which tenotomy of the externi, performed on account
+of relative divergence, was followed by convergent squint, just as
+injudicious division of the interni may induce divergent squint. It is
+probable, therefore, that the faulty effect of simple tenotomy in
+permanent absolute divergent squint depends on other causes, which, in
+my opinion, are to be found in the obliques. The loop formed by the
+obliques round the posterior circumference of the eye is most stretched,
+when the visual line falls in with the muscular plane of the obliques in
+a medial direction of the eyes. On the whole, then, it is proved that
+the obliques are extended on turning the eyes inwards, but shortened on
+turning the eyes outwards by means of their muscular action. In
+divergent squint, if the movement inwards occurs but seldom or not at
+all, the obliques consequently are not extended in a normal way&mdash;it
+follows then that they lose in ductility, offer greater resistance to
+the inward movement, and by means of their elastic tension continually
+draw the posterior pole of the eye inwards and the cornea outwards. As
+in strabotomy we cannot get at the obliques, it seems all the more
+desirable to offer them stronger resistance by greater tension of the
+internus by means of advancement. Certainly tenotomy of the external
+rectus of the fixing eye is as a rule also necessary. A sufficient
+result is usually thus obtained at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span> once; if it is much lessened in the
+course of one or two months there is nothing to prevent the repetition
+of the tenotomy of one or the other external rectus.</p>
+
+<p>The innervation for the movement of convergence is not always perfectly
+lost; it withdraws itself from the influence of binocular fusion because
+this is gradually forgotten while a convergence, even if an insufficient
+one, unites itself with the effort of accommodation. If we ask such
+patients to fix a large object lying near, a pencil, for example, they
+cannot usually converge upon it, whilst if we ask them to read at the
+same distance, a distinct convergent movement occurs; large objects are
+sufficiently clearly recognised, even without distinct retinal images,
+and the supposition that an effort of accommodation is present is only
+justified if we employ sufficiently small objects at the examination, in
+order to distinguish which, clear retinal images are necessary. Of
+course we must have regard to the condition of refraction; myopes, who
+use their far point for reading, want no accommodation, therefore no
+convergent movement occurs, even if the impulse of innervation for it,
+is not yet quite lost. However, the innervation for convergence may be
+lost, without the internal recti losing in elastic tension. The
+operative importance of this relation may be illustrated by an example.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 51.</span>&mdash;Bertha K&mdash;, &aelig;t. 10, has myopia 5 D. on both sides, visual
+acuteness 12/20, and divergent strabismus. At 4 mm. the crossed diplopia
+is corrected by prism 23&deg;; a convergent movement is no longer attained,
+at most parallelism of the visual axes. Tenotomy of both interni on
+October 2nd, 1873. The immediate result was convergent squint, with a
+defect in movement outwards amounting to 4 to 5 mm. in both eyes. On
+October 9th prism 37&deg; was still necessary to unite the homonymous double
+images at a distance of 4 m.; single vision existed only to about 20 cm.
+The area of single vision gradually extended itself; at the end of
+October<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span> it was restored for distance also, facultative divergence
+<i>nil</i>; however, relative divergence was present for near objects.
+Naturally this was not the result of muscular weakness of the interni,
+for they had proved their capabilities by a convergent squint,
+fortunately only temporary, which made one anxious, but was solely the
+result of a faulty innervation. The further course was also interesting.
+After three years, in October, 1876, the myopia of the left eye amounted
+to 8 D., that of the right 7 D., visual acuteness 1/2 on the right, on
+the left 3/4 of the normal; a posterior staphyloma measuring about 1/3
+of the diameter of the optic disc was present. The left eye was used for
+near objects with relative divergence of the right and the occasional
+occurrence of diplopia; there was convergence only to about 15 cm.
+Facultative divergence <i>nil</i>.</p>
+
+<p>We very frequently have the opportunity of seeing, that myopia increases
+even after tenotomy of the externus, and if von Graefe's assertion that
+the progress of myopia would be brought to a standstill by means of
+tenotomy still finds believers, I should like to cite one example which
+offers proof to the contrary.</p>
+
+<p>In permanent divergent squint we shall have, as a rule, to combine
+shortening of the internus of the squinting eye with tenotomy of both
+externi, even if the convergent movement is still possible to a slight
+degree. The result thus obtained differs somewhat; sometimes it suffices
+at once, sometimes a repetition of the separation of the externi is
+necessary later on. Two examples may illustrate this.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 52.</span>&mdash;Miss Marie M&mdash;, &aelig;t. 22, has squinted on the left side since
+her third year, nominally after a keratitis, which left behind in the
+left eye a nebula of the cornea of small circumference. The deviation
+amounts to 8 mm. The visual power is much worse than the opacity of the
+cornea leads us to suppose, with visual axes deviating inwards fingers
+were only counted at a distance of about 1 m.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>On the right myopia 1 D., V. = 4/5. A slight convergent movement is
+still practicable. At the end of May, 1879, shortening of the left
+internal rectus, tenotomy of both externi. The next day slight
+convergence on viewing distant objects, correct position after four
+days. In January, 1880, correct position of the eyes, convergence
+possible to about 20 cm. While a correction of 8 mm. was immediately
+obtained here, the same operation does not always permanently suffice
+for slighter deviations.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 53.</span>&mdash;Ernest Sp&mdash;, &aelig;t. 11-1/2; divergent squint had been observed as
+early as his second year. The deviation amounts to 5 or 6 mm., is
+sometimes alternating, generally the left eye deviates. No convergent
+movement on fixing a pencil about 25 cm. distant; the right eye is then
+used for reading, the left one makes a distinct, but not a sufficient,
+movement inwards. Emmetropia on both sides, visual acuteness nearly
+perfect on the right, on the left 2/3 of the normal. Even with red glass
+and prisms deviating in a vertical direction, double images not
+perceived. On October 2nd, 1879, shortening of the left internal rectus,
+tenotomy of both externi. A week later divergence was no longer present.
+When reading, the left eye makes a distinct, perhaps rather too great,
+movement of convergence, and yet six weeks after the operation, distinct
+divergent squint was again present, even if to a slighter degree than
+before; the left eye deviates 3 to 4 mm., the right 2 to 3 mm. outwards.
+The result obtained amounted then to not more than about 3 mm. In the
+middle of December the tenotomy of both externi was therefore repeated.
+A week after the operation convergent squint of 2 mm. is present with
+homonymous diplopia. A pencil made to approach on the middle line is
+seen double to about 20 cm., on approaching nearer, double images are
+not perceived in spite of distinct relative divergence. Double images at
+a distance of 4 m. are corrected by prism 25&deg;; as, however,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span> normal
+binocular vision is not present, the value of this statement is very
+questionable. Three weeks after the second operation the position of the
+eyes was normal, and the slightest convergence was perceived only on
+close investigation. Double images are no longer observed, however they
+may still be brought to view.</p>
+
+<p>In periodic divergent squint, if the deviation is considerable and
+frequent, if at the same time the normal near point of convergence is
+only attained with difficulty or not at all, we can hardly combine
+shortening of the internus with tenotomy of the externus; more often
+indeed, additional tenotomy of the externus of the other eye is
+necessary in order to obtain a permanent cure. In exceptional cases
+(when it seemed to me as if the squint depended more on insufficiency of
+the internus than on preponderance of the externus) I have confined
+myself to shortening the internus without separating the externus; I
+will quote just one example of this.</p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Case 54.</span>&mdash;Ida K&mdash;, &aelig;t. 11. On the right, hypermetropia 3 D. with the
+ophthalmoscope, visual acuteness 5/24. No. 0&middot;3 is read with difficulty.
+On the left, with the ophthalmoscope hypermetropia 4&middot;5 D. with
+asymmetric meridian. Single letters of 3&middot;0 m. are recognised with convex
+6&middot;5 D. Fingers are counted at about 1-1/2 m. The choroid is slightly and
+unequally pigmented, no ophthalmoscopically assignable reason exists for
+the considerable visual defect. The left eye frequently deviates
+outwards, convergence is attainable to 15 cm. On May 2nd, 1877,
+shortening of the internus (without tenotomy of the externus). Two weeks
+later slight convergent squint was present; in November, 1877, six
+months after the operation, the position of the left eye was perfectly
+normal.</p>
+
+<p>Tenotomy of the externi suffices when the divergent deviation is
+inconsiderable and does not occur often, if the normal near point of
+convergence can still be reached, and binocular fusion is possible.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>If we want to increase the effect of simple tenotomy of the externi,
+this may be done just as well by practice of the associated movements of
+the eyes as by practice of the convergence, of course for a short time
+only after the operation. As long as the detached tendon of the external
+rectus is not re-attached firmly with the sclerotic, all these movements
+of the eyes help to strengthen the result of the tenotomy. In order to
+practise convergence we can bring a suitable fixed point on to a mirror
+and so make it possible for the patient himself to see the position of
+his eyes, of course only in cases where binocular fusion is no longer
+present. He who possesses a normal binocular vision is troubled in these
+exercises by diplopia; but this is not the case in the suppression of
+binocular fusion so frequent as a result of squint.</p>
+
+<p>Periodic divergent squint is divided by no sharply defined limits from
+those cases in which only a preponderance of the externi exists without
+insufficiency of the interni. We frequently find very considerable
+degrees of facultative divergence as a casual symptom, without the
+occurrence of manifest divergence or the presence of asthenopic
+troubles. If this is accompanied by weakness of the interni, absolute
+divergence occurs on looking at near objects, sometimes for distance
+also and certainly if we suppress binocular fusion by covering one eye
+or render it difficult by colouring one visual field with a red glass.</p>
+
+<p>In these cases the indications for the operation are given either by
+asthenopia, by troublesome double images or by the disfigurement
+inseparable from periodic squint; it will depend on the degree of the
+facultative divergence, whether we confine the tenotomy of the externus
+to one eye or whether we distribute it between both eyes.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, it may be desirable to still say a few words as to the most
+favorable period for the operation. The comprehension of the defective
+sight often present in squint as caused by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span> "non-use" has resulted in
+the preposterous advice that tenotomy should be carried out as early as
+possible. I can vouch for the fact that even the earliest tenotomy of
+the ocular muscles is of no avail against congenital amblyopia. I have
+repeatedly seen children on whom tenotomy had been performed in their
+first year, usually with bad cosmetic result but with continuance of
+defective sight of the squinting eye.</p>
+
+<p>The final result of the operation is almost always very unsatisfactory
+when performed on children before their fourth year. I can show a number
+of good results in children on whom I operated between their fifth and
+sixth year; however, the more I considered the subject, the more it
+seemed to me advisable to raise the tests which must be imposed on the
+patients. With children it is not so much a question of determining the
+limit of age, but whether their intelligence is sufficiently developed
+to render a reliable examination possible. A sufficient knowledge of
+letters and the power of reading is necessary to an accurate trial of
+vision; the entire bearing of the children must permit of the
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of the weak condition and should raise no
+scruples as to wearing spectacles which may be necessary after the
+operation. Under any circumstances no harm is done by deferring the
+operation until these conditions are fulfilled; the interval may be
+filled up by practising the mobility of the eyes, which does more good
+than the customary strabismus spectacles or even tying up the eye. If we
+tie up the fixing eye, the squinting one is certainly put into fixation,
+but the other squints instead, and of course it is just the same with
+the plan, as childish as it is antiquated, of tying on a pierced walnut
+shell before each eye.</p>
+
+<p>Strabismus spectacles, <i>i. e.</i> those with a leather band to go round the
+head, provided with leaden discs which cover one eye completely and
+leave only a side aperture for the other, of course only induce a
+transfer of the squint to the covered eye,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span> together with practice of
+the eye in a lateral direction; but apart from their unsightly
+appearance they require a constant lateral direction of the eye, which
+is followed even after a short time by fatigue of the muscles employed
+and soon becomes unbearable. This is not the case if we cause the
+mobility to be practised alternately and towards both sides; here we
+must insist that the limits of the outward movement are really reached.
+These exercises are at least rational and tend to increase the strength
+of the antagonist, on which we must depend so much in the operation and
+to diminish an insufficiency made worse by want of practice.</p>
+
+<h4>PRINTED BY ADLARD AND SON, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE.</h4>
+
+<hr style='width: 45%;' /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1a" id="Page_1a">[Pg 1]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Catalogue B] &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<i>London, 11, New Burlington Street March, 1887</i></p>
+
+
+<h3><i>SELECTION</i></h3>
+
+<h4>FROM</h4>
+
+<h2>J. &amp; A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE</h2>
+
+<h4>COMPRISING</h4>
+
+<h3><i>ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM</i></h3>
+
+<h4>ON THE</h4>
+
+<h2><span class="smcap">ART and SCIENCE of MEDICINE</span></h2>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 135px;">
+<img src="images/title.jpg" width="135" height="175" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>N.B.&mdash;As far as possible, this List is arranged in the order in which
+medical study is usually pursued.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2a" id="Page_2a">[Pg 2]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style='width: 45%;' />
+
+<p>J. &amp; A. CHURCHILL publish for the following Institutions and Public
+Bodies:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>
+<b>ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">CATALOGUES OF THE MUSEUM.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Twenty-three separate Catalogues (List and Prices can be obtained of <span class="smcap">J.</span><br />
+&amp; A. Churchill</span>).<br />
+<br />
+<b>GUY'S HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Vol. XXVIII., Third Series. 7s. 6d.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">FORMUL&AElig; USED IN THE HOSPITAL IN ADDITION TO THOSE</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">IN THE B. P. 1s. 6d.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>LONDON HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">PHARMACOP&OElig;IA OF THE HOSPITAL. 3s.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">CLINICAL LECTURES AND REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">SURGICAL STAFF. Vols. I. to IV. 7s. 6d. each.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">CATALOGUE OF THE ANATOMICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">MUSEUM. Vol. I.&mdash;Pathology. 15s. Vol. II.&mdash;Teratology, Anatomy</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">and Physiology, Botany. 7s. 6d.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>ST. GEORGE'S HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">The last Volume (X.) was issued in 1880. Price 7s. 6d.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 15s.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">SUPPLEMENTARY CATALOGUE (1882). 5s.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>ST. THOMAS'S HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Annually. Vol. XV., New Series. 7s. 6d.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 12s.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Annually. Vol. II. 6s.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>ROYAL LONDON OPHTHALMIC HOSPITAL.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Occasionally. Vol. XI., Part III. 5s.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">TRANSACTIONS.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Vol. VI. 12s. 6d.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">JOURNAL OF MENTAL SCIENCE.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Quarterly. 3s. 6d. each, or 14s. per annum.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">Every Saturday. 4d. each, or 20s. per annum, post free.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">YEAR BOOK OF PHARMACY.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">In December. 10s.</span><br />
+<br />
+<b>BRITISH DENTAL ASSOCIATION.</b><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION AND MONTHLY REVIEW</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 5em;">OF DENTAL SURGERY.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 6em;">On the 15th of each Month. 6d. each, or 7s. per annum, post free.</span><br />
+</p>
+
+<hr style='width: 45%;' /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3a" id="Page_3a">[Pg 3]</a></span></p>
+
+<h3>A SELECTION</h3>
+
+<h4>from</h4>
+
+<h2>J. &amp; A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE,</h2>
+
+<h4>comprising</h4>
+
+<h2>ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM ON THE <b>ART AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE</b>.</h2>
+
+<p>N.B.&mdash;<i>J. &amp; A. Churchill's Descriptive List of Works on Chemistry,
+Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the Microscope,
+and other Branches of Science, can be had on application.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Practical Anatomy</b>: A Manual of Dissections. By <span class="smcap">Christopher Heath</span>,
+Surgeon to University College Hospital. Sixth Edition. Revised by
+<span class="smcap">Rickman J. Godlee</span>, M.S. Lond., F.R.C.S., Demonstrator of Anatomy in
+University College, and Assistant Surgeon to the Hospital. Crown 8vo,
+with 24 Coloured Plates and 274 Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Wilson's Anatomist's Vade-Mecum.</b> Tenth Edition. By <span class="smcap">George Buchanan</span>,
+Professor of Clinical Surgery in the University of Glasgow; and <span class="smcap">Henry E.
+Clark</span>, M.R.C.S., Lecturer on Anatomy at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary
+School of Medicine. Crown 8vo, with 450 Engravings (including 26
+Coloured Plates), 18s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Braune's Atlas of Topographical Anatomy</b>, after Plane Sections of Frozen
+Bodies. Translated by <span class="smcap">Edward Bellamy</span>, Surgeon to, and Lecturer on
+Anatomy, &amp;c., at, Charing Cross Hospital. Large Imp. 8vo, with 34
+Photolithographic Plates and 46 Woodcuts, 40s.</p>
+
+<p><b>An Atlas of Human Anatomy.</b> By <span class="smcap">Rickman J. Godlee</span>, M.S., F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon and Senior Demonstrator of Anatomy, University College
+Hospital. With 48 Imp. 4to Plates (112 figures), and a volume of
+Explanatory Text. 8vo, &pound;4 14s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Harvey's (Wm.) Manuscript Lectures</b>. Prelectiones Anatomi&aelig; Universalis.
+Edited, with an Autotype reproduction of the Original, by a Committee of
+the Royal College of Physicians of London. Crown 4to, half bound in
+Persian, 52s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Anatomy of the Joints of Man.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry Morris</span>, Surgeon to, and Lecturer
+on Anatomy and Practical Surgery at, the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with
+44 Lithographic Plates (several being coloured) and 13 Wood Engravings,
+16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of the Dissection of the Human Body</b>. By <span class="smcap">Luther Holden</span>, Consulting
+Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Edited by <span class="smcap">John Langton</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to, and Lecturer on Anatomy at, St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+Fifth Edition. 8vo, with 208 Engravings. 20s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Human Osteology.</b> Sixth Edition, edited by the Author and <span class="smcap">James Shuter</span>,
+F.R.C.S., M.A., M.B., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo, with 61 Lithographic Plates and 89 Engravings. 16s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Landmarks, Medical and Surgical.</b> Fourth Edition. 8vo. [<i>In the Press.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Surgical Anatomy.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward Bellamy</span>, F.R.C.S. and
+Member of the Board of Examiners. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 81
+Engravings. 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Human Osteology.</b> By <span class="smcap">William Warwick Wagstaffe</span>,
+late Assistant Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with 23
+Plates and 66 Engravings. 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Anatomical Remembrancer</b>; or, Complete Pocket Anatomist. Eighth
+Edition. 32mo, 3s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4a" id="Page_4a">[Pg 4]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Diagrams of the Nerves of the Human Body</b>, exhibiting their Origin,
+Divisions, and Connections, with their Distribution to the Various
+Regions of the Cutaneous Surface, and to all the Muscles. By <span class="smcap">W. H.
+Flower</span>, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. Third Edition, with 6 Plates. Roya. 4to, 12s.</p>
+
+<p><b>General Pathology.</b> An Introduction to. By <span class="smcap">John Bland Sutton</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Sir E. Wilson Lecturer on Pathology, R.C.S.; Assistant Surgeon to, and
+Lecturer on Anatomy at, Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with 149 Engravings,
+14s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Atlas of Pathological Anatomy.</b> By Dr. <span class="smcap">Lancereaux</span>. Translated by <span class="smcap">W. S.
+Greenfield</span>, M.D., Professor of Pathology in the University of Edinburgh.
+Imp. 8vo, with 70 Coloured Plates, &pound;5 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Pathological Anatomy.</b> By <span class="smcap">C. Handfield Jones</span>, M.B., F.R.S.,
+and <span class="smcap">E. H. Sieveking</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Edited by J. F. Payne, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on General Pathology at St. Thomas's Hospital. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 195 Engravings, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Post-mortem Examinations</b>: A Description and Explanation of the Method of
+Performing them, with especial reference to Medico-Legal Practice. By
+Prof. <span class="smcap">Virchow</span>. Translated by Dr. <span class="smcap">T. P. Smith</span>. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+with 4 Plates, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Human Brain</b>: Histological and Coarse Methods of Research. A Manual
+for Students and Asylum Medical Officers. By <span class="smcap">W. Bevan Lewis</span>, L.R.C.P.
+Lond., Medical Superintendent, West Riding Lunatic Asylum. 8vo, with
+Wood Engravings and Photographs, 8s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Physiology</b>: For the use of Junior Students of Medicine. By
+<span class="smcap">Gerald F. Yeo</span>, M.D., F.R.C.S., Professor of Physiology in King's
+College, London. Crown 8vo, with 300 Engravings, 14s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Principles of Human Physiology.</b> By <span class="smcap">W. B. Carpenter</span>, C.B., M.D., F.R.S.
+Ninth Edition. By <span class="smcap">Henry Power</span>, M.B., F.R.C.S. 8vo, with 3 Steel Plates
+and 377 Wood Engravings, 31s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on Physiology.</b> By <span class="smcap">Philip H. Pye-Smith</span>,
+B.A., M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with
+Diagrams, Notes, and Tables, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Treatise on Human Physiology.</b> By <span class="smcap">John C. Dalton</span>, M.D. Seventh Edition.
+8vo, with 252 Engravings, 20s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Elementary Practical Biology</b>: Vegetable. By <span class="smcap">Thomas W. Shore</span>, M.D., B.Sc.
+Lond., Lecturer on Comparative Anatomy at St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo. 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Histology and Histo-Chemistry of Man.</b> By <span class="smcap">Heinrich Frey</span>, Professor of
+Medicine in Zurich. Translated by <span class="smcap">Arthur E. J. Barker</span>, Assistant Surgeon
+to University College Hospital. 8vo, with 608 Engravings, 21s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Text-Book of Medical Physics</b>, for Students and Practitioners. By <span class="smcap">J. C.
+Draper</span>, M.D., LL.D., Professor of Physics in the University of New York.
+With 377 Engravings. 8vo, 18s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Law of Sex.</b> By <span class="smcap">G. B. Starkweather</span>, F.R.G.S. With 40 Illustrative
+Portraits. 8vo, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Influence of Sex in Disease.</b> By <span class="smcap">W. Roger Williams</span>, F.R.C.S., Surgical
+Registrar to the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Medical Jurisprudence</b>: Its Principles and Practice. By <span class="smcap">Alfred S. Taylor</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Third Edition, by <span class="smcap">Thomas Stevenson</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Medical Jurisprudence at Guy's Hospital. 2 vols.
+8vo, with 188 Engravings, 31s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Authors.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence.</b> Eleventh Edition. Crown 8vo, with 56
+Engravings, 14s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Poisons</b>, In Relation to Medical Jurisprudence and Medicine. Third
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 104 Engravings, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on Medical Jurisprudence.</b> By <span class="smcap">Francis Ogston</span>, M.D., late
+Professor in the University of Aberdeen. Edited by <span class="smcap">Francis Ogston</span>, Jun.,
+M.D. 8vo, with 12 Copper Plates, 18s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Medical Jurisprudence.</b> By <span class="smcap">John Abercrombie</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Forensic Medicine to Charing Cross Hospital. Fcap.
+8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Microscopical Examination of Drinking Water and of Air.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. D.
+Macdonald</span>, M.D., F.R.S., Ex-Professor of Naval Hygiene in the Army
+Medical School. Second Edition. 8vo, with 25 Plates, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Pay Hospitals and Paying Wards throughout the World.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry C.
+Burdett</span>. 8vo, 7s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Cottage Hospitals&mdash;General, Fever, and Convalescent</b>: Their Progress,
+Management, and Work. Second Edition, with many Plans and Illustrations.
+Crown 8vo, 14s.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5a" id="Page_5a">[Pg 5]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Practical Hygiene.</b> By <span class="smcap">F. A. Parkes</span>, M.D., F.R.S. Sixth
+Edition, by <span class="smcap">F. de Chaumont</span>, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Military Hygiene
+in the Army Medical School. 8vo, with numerous Plates and Engravings.
+18s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Handbook of Hygiene and Sanitary Science.</b> By <span class="smcap">Geo. Wilson</span>, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.S.E., Medical Officer of Health for Mid-Warwickshire. Sixth Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings. 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Healthy Life and Healthy Dwellings</b>: A Guide to Personal and Domestic
+Hygiene. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Sanitary Examinations</b> Of Water, Air, and Food. A Vade-Mecum for the
+Medical Officer of Health. By <span class="smcap">Cornelius B. Fox</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 110 Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Dangers to Health</b>: A Pictorial Guide to Domestic Sanitary Defects. By <span class="smcap">T.
+Pridgin Teale</span>, M.A., Surgeon to the Leeds General Infirmary. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 70 Lithograph Plates (mostly coloured), 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hospitals, Infirmaries, and Dispensaries</b>: Their Construction, Interior
+Arrangement, and Management; with Descriptions of existing Institutions,
+and 74 Illustrations. By <span class="smcap">F. Oppert</span>, M.D., M.R.C.P.L. Second Edition.
+Royal 8vo, 12s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hospital Construction and Management.</b> By <span class="smcap">F. J. Mouat</span>, M.D., Local
+Government Board Inspector, and <span class="smcap">H. Saxon Snell</span>, Fell. Roy. Inst. Brit.
+Architects. In 2 Parts, 4to, 15s. each; or, the whole work bound in half
+calf, with large Map, 54 Lithographic Plates, and 27 Woodcuts, 35s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Anthropometry</b>: A Guide to the Measurement of the Human Body,
+containing an Anthropometrical Chart and Register, a Systematic Table of
+Measurements, &amp;c. By <span class="smcap">Charles Roberts</span>, F.R.C.S. 8vo, with numerous
+Illustrations and Tables, 8s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Detection of Colour-Blindness and Imperfect Eyesight.</b> 8vo, with a Table
+of Coloured Wools, and Sheet of Test-types, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Illustrations of the Influence of the Mind upon the Body in Health and
+Disease</b>; Designed to elucidate the Action of the Imagination. By <span class="smcap">Daniel
+Hack Tuke</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., LL.D. Second Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, 15s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism.</b> 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Psychological Medicine.</b> With an Appendix of Cases. By <span class="smcap">John
+C. Bucknill</span>, M.D., F.R.S., and <span class="smcap">D. Hack Tuke</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 12 Plates (30 Figures) and Engravings, 25s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Mental Diseases.</b> Clinical Lectures. By <span class="smcap">T. S. Clouston</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P.
+Edin., Lecturer on Mental Diseases in the University of Edinburgh. With
+8 Plates (6 Coloured). Crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Private Treatment of the Insane as Single Patients.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward East</span>,
+M.R.C.S., L.S.A. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Midwifery.</b> By <span class="smcap">Alfred L. Galabin</span>, M.A., M.D., F.R.C.P.,
+Obstetric Physician to, and Lecturer on Midwifery, &amp;c. at, Guy's
+Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 227 Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to the Practice of Midwifery.</b> By <span class="smcap">D. Lloyd Roberts</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Clinical Midwifery and Diseases of Women at
+the Owens College; Obstetric Physician to the Manchester Royal
+Infirmary. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 2 Coloured Plates and 127 Wood
+Engravings, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on Obstetric Operations</b>: Including the Treatment of H&aelig;morrhage,
+and forming a Guide to the Management of Difficult Labour. By <span class="smcap">Robert
+Barnes</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Consulting Obstetric Physician to St. George's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 121 Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Clinical History of Medical and Surgical Diseases of Women.</b> Second
+Edition. 8vo, with 181 Engravings, 28s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Clinical Lectures on Diseases of Women</b>: Delivered in St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital, by <span class="smcap">J. Matthews Duncan</span>, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. Third Edition. 8vo,
+16s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Sterility in Woman.</b> Being the Gulstonian Lectures, delivered in the
+Royal College of Physicians, in Feb., 1883. 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Notes on Diseases of Women</b>: Specially designed to assist the Student in
+preparing for Examination. By <span class="smcap">J. J. Reynolds</span>, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. Third
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Notes on Midwifery</b>: Specially designed for Students preparing for
+Examination. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 15 Engravings, 4s.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6a" id="Page_6a">[Pg 6]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to the Diseases of Women.</b> By <span class="smcap">Alfred L. Galabin</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Obstetric Physician to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>West on the Diseases of Women.</b> Fourth Edition, revised by the Author,
+with numerous Additions by <span class="smcap">J. Matthews Duncan</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S.E.,
+Obstetric Physician to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. 8vo, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Dysmenorrh&oelig;a, its Pathology and Treatment.</b> By <span class="smcap">Heywood Smith</span>, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Obstetric Aphorisms</b>: For the Use of Students commencing Midwifery
+Practice. By <span class="smcap">Joseph G. Swayne</span>, M.D. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Obstetrics.</b> By <span class="smcap">A. F. A. King</span>, A.M., M.D., Professor of
+Obstetrics, &amp;c., in the Columbian University, Washington, and the
+University of Vermont. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with 102 Engravings,
+8s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Handbook of Midwifery for Midwives</b>: By <span class="smcap">J. E. Burton</span>, L.R.C.P. Lond.,
+Surgeon to the Hospital for Women, Liverpool. Second Edition. With
+Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Handbook of Uterine Therapeutics</b>, and of Diseases of Women. By <span class="smcap">E. J.
+Tilt</span>, M.D., M.R.C.P. Fourth Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Change of Life</b> In Health and Disease: A Clinical Treatise on the
+Diseases of the Nervous System incidental to Women at the Decline of
+Life. Fourth Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Principles and Practice of Gyn&aelig;cology.</b> By <span class="smcap">Thomas Addis Emmet</span>, M.D.,
+Surgeon to the Woman's Hospital, New York. Third Edition. Royal 8vo,
+with 150 Engravings, 24s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, and Fallopian Tubes</b>: A Practical
+Treatise by <span class="smcap">A. Courty</span>, Professor of Clinical Surgery, Montpellier.
+Translated from Third Edition by his Pupil, <span class="smcap">Agnes McLaren</span>, M.D.,
+M.K.Q.C.P.I., with Preface by <span class="smcap">J. Matthews Duncan,</span> M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo,
+with 424 Engravings, 24s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Female Pelvic Organs</b>: Their Surgery, Surgical Pathology, and
+Surgical Anatomy. In a Series of Coloured Plates taken from Nature; with
+Commentaries, Notes, and Cases. By <span class="smcap">Henry Savage</span>, M.D., F.R.C.S.,
+Consulting Officer of the Samaritan Free Hospital. Fifth Edition. Roy.
+4to, with 17 Lithographic Plates(15 coloured) and 52 Woodcuts, &pound;1 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Ovarian and Uterine Tumours</b>: Their Pathology and Surgical Treatment. By
+Sir <span class="smcap">T. Spencer Wells</span>, Bart., F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to the
+Samaritan Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings, 21s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Abdominal Tumours</b>: Their Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of Women.</b> By <span class="smcap">T. Gaillard Thomas</span>,
+M.D., Professor of Diseases of Women in the College of Physicians and
+Surgeons, New York. Fifth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 266 Engravings, 25s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Backward Displacements of the Uterus and Prolapsus Uteri</b>: Treatment by
+the New Method of Shortening the Round Ligaments. By <span class="smcap">William Alexander</span>,
+M.D., M.Ch.Q.U.I., F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Infirmary. Crown
+8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Diseases of Children.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jas. F. Goodhart</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital, and to the Evelina Hospital for
+Sick Children. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of Children.</b> For Practitioners and Students. By <span class="smcap">W. H. Day</span>,
+M.D., Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo,
+12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Practical Treatise on Disease in Children.</b> By <span class="smcap">Eustace Smith</span>, M.D.,
+Physician to the King of the Belgians, Physician to the East London
+Hospital for Children. 8vo, 22s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Clinical Studies of Disease in Children.</b> Second Edition. Post 8vo, 7s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children.</b> Fourth Edition. Post 8vo,
+8s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Practical Manual of the Diseases of Children.</b> With a Formulary. By
+<span class="smcap">Edward Ellis</span>, M.D. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual for Hospital Nurses</b> and others engaged in Attending on the
+Sick. By <span class="smcap">Edward J. Domville</span>, Surgeon to the Exeter Lying-in Charity.
+Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Nursing, Medical and Surgical.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles J. Cullingworth</span>,
+M.D., Physician to St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester. Second Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Short Manual for Monthly Nurses.</b> Fcap. 8vo, 1s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7a" id="Page_7a">[Pg 7]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Notes on Fever Nursing.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. W. Allan</span>, M.B., Physician, Superintendent
+Glasgow Fever Hospital. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Outlines of Infectious Diseases</b>: For the use of Clinical Students. Fcap.
+8vo.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hospital Sisters and their Duties.</b> By <span class="smcap">Eva C. E. L&uuml;ckes</span>, Matron to the
+London Hospital. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases and their Commencement.</b> Lectures to Trained Nurses. By <span class="smcap">Donald
+W. C. Hood</span>, M.D., M.R.C.P., Physician to the West London Hospital. Crown
+8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Infant Feeding and its Influence on Life</b>; By <span class="smcap">C. H. F. Routh</span>, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo.
+[Preparing.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Botany</b>: Including the Structure, Classification, Properties,
+Uses, and Functions of Plants. By <span class="smcap">Robert Bentley</span>, Professor of Botany in
+King's College and to the Pharmaceutical Society. Fifth Edition. Crown
+8vo, with 1,178 Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Structural, Morphological, and Physiological
+Botany.</b> With 660 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Systematic Botany</b>, including the Classification
+of Plants and Descriptive Botany. Fcap. 8vo, with 350 Engravings, 3s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Medicinal Plants</b>: Being descriptions, with original figures, of the
+Principal Plants employed in Medicine, and an account of their
+Properties and Uses. By Prof. <span class="smcap">Bentley</span> and Dr. <span class="smcap">H. Trimen</span>. In 4 vols.,
+large 8vo, with 306 Coloured Plates, bound in Half Morocco, Gilt Edges,
+&pound;11 11s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The National Dispensatory</b>: Containing the Natural History, Chemistry,
+Pharmacy, Actions and Uses of Medicines. By <span class="smcap">Alfred Still&eacute;</span>, M.D., LL.D.,
+and John M. Maisch, Ph.D. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 311 Engravings, 36s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Royle's Manual of Materia Medica and Therapeutics.</b> Sixth Edition,
+including additions and alterations in the B. P. 1885. By <span class="smcap">John Harley</span>,
+M.D., Physician to St. Thomas's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 139
+Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Materia Medica.</b> A Manual for the use of Students. By <span class="smcap">Isambard Owen</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Materia Medica, &amp;c., to St. George's
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Materia Medica and Therapeutics</b>: Vegetable Kingdom&mdash;Organic
+Compounds&mdash;Animal Kingdom. By <span class="smcap">Charles D. F. Phillips</span>, M.D., F.R.S.
+Edin., late Lecturer on Materia Medica and Therapeutics at the
+Westminster Hospital Medical School. 8vo, 25s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Materia Medica and Therapeutics.</b> By <span class="smcap">John C.
+Thorowgood</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 7s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Pharmacop&oelig;ia of the London Hospital.</b> Compiled under the direction
+of a Committee appointed by the Hospital Medical Council. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Companion to the British Pharmacop&oelig;ia.</b> By <span class="smcap">Peter Squire</span>, Revised by
+his Sons, P. W. and A. H. Squire. 14th Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Authors.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Pharmacop&oelig;ias of the London Hospitals</b>, arranged in Groups for
+Easy Reference and Comparison. Fifth Edition. 18mo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Prescriber's Pharmacop&oelig;ia</b>: The Medicines arranged in Classes
+according to their Action, with their Composition and Doses. By <span class="smcap">Nestor
+J. C. Tirard</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Professor of Materia Medica and
+Therapeutics in King's College, London. Sixth Edition. 32mo, bound in
+leather, 3s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Clinical Medicine</b>: A Systematic Treatise on the Diagnosis and Treatment
+of Disease. By <span class="smcap">Austin Flint</span>, M.D., Professor of Medicine in the Bellevue
+Hospital Medical College. 8vo, 20s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Medicine.</b> Sixth Edition. By
+the <span class="smcap">Author</span>, and <span class="smcap">W. H. Welch</span>, M.D., and <span class="smcap">Austin Flint</span>, jun., M.D. 8vo,
+with Engravings, 26s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Climate and Fevers of India</b>, with a series of Cases (Croonian Lectures,
+1882). By Sir <span class="smcap">Joseph Fayrer</span>, K.C.S.I., M.D. 8vo, with 17 Temperature
+Charts, 12s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Family Medicine for India.</b> A Manual. By <span class="smcap">William J. Moore</span>, M.D., C.I.E.,
+Honorary Surgeon to the Viceroy of India. Published under the Authority
+of the Government of India. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with Engravings.
+[<i>In the Press.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of the Diseases of India</b>: With a Compendium of Diseases
+generally. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids</b>, in India, at Home, and Abroad.
+Post 8vo, 5s.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8a" id="Page_8a">[Pg 8]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Practical Therapeutics</b>: A Manual. By <span class="smcap">Edward J. Waring</span>, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., and <span class="smcap">Dudley W. Buxton</span>, M.D., B.S. Lond. Fourth Edition. Crown
+8vo, 14s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Bazaar Medicines of India</b>, And Common Medical Plants: With Full Index of
+Diseases, indicating their Treatment by these and other Agents
+procurable throughout India, &amp;c. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Commentary on the Diseases of India.</b> By <span class="smcap">Norman Chevers</span>, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., Deputy Surgeon-General H. M. Indian Army. 8vo, 24s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Principles and Practice of Medicine.</b> By <span class="smcap">C. Hilton Fagge</span>, M.D. Edited
+by <span class="smcap">P. H. Pye-Smith</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to, and Lecturer on
+Medicine at, Guy's Hospital. 2 vols. 8vo, 1860 pp. Cloth, 36s.; Half
+Persian, 42s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to the Practice of Medicine.</b> By <span class="smcap">Matthew Charteris</span>,
+M.D., Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Glasgow. Fourth
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings on Copper and Wood. 9s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hooper's Physicians' Vade-Mecum.</b> A Manual of the Principles and Practice
+of Physic. Tenth Edition. By <span class="smcap">W. A. Guy</span>, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., and <span class="smcap">J. Harley</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P. With 118 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Clinical Medicine and Case-Taking.</b> By <span class="smcap">Francis
+Warner</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>How to Examine the Chest</b>: Being a Practical Guide for the use of
+Students. By <span class="smcap">Samuel West</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the City of
+London Hospital for Diseases of the Chest; Medical Tutor and Registrar
+at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. With 42 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, and its Antiseptic
+Treatment.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Burney Yeo</span>, M.D., Physician to King's College Hospital.
+Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Operative Treatment of Intra-thoracic Effusion.</b> Fothergillian Prize
+Essay. By <span class="smcap">Norman Porritt</span>, L.R.C.P. Lond., M.R.C.S. With Engravings.
+Crown 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Chest</b>: Contributions to their Clinical History,
+Pathology, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">A. T. Houghton Waters</span>, M.D., Physician to
+the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second Edition. 8vo, with Plates, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Medical Diagnosis.</b> By <span class="smcap">Samuel Fenwick</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital, and <span class="smcap">Bedford Fenwick</span>, M.D.,
+M.R.C.P. Sixth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 114 Engravings, 7s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Outlines of Medical Treatment.</b> Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+7s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>On Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach</b>, and on the Nervous Affections of the
+Digestive Organs. 8vo, 8s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Microscope in Medicine.</b> By <span class="smcap">Lionel S. Beale</span>, M.B., F.R.S., Physician
+to King's College Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 86 Plates, 21s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>On Slight Ailments:</b> Their Nature and Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Spectroscope in Medicine.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles A. MacMunn</span>, B.A., M.D. 8vo,
+with 3 Chromo-lithographic Plates of Physiological and Pathological
+Spectra, and 13 Engravings, 9s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Notes on Asthma:</b> Its Forms and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">John C. Thorowgood</span>, M.D.,
+Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Chest. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>What is Consumption?</b> By <span class="smcap">G. W. Hambleton</span>, L.K.Q.C.P.I. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Winter Cough</b> (Catarrh, Bronchitis, Emphysema, Asthma). By <span class="smcap">Horace Dobell</span>,
+M.D., Consulting Physician to the Royal Hospital for Diseases of the
+Chest. Third Edition. 8vo, with Coloured Plates, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Loss of Weight, Blood-Spitting, and Lung Disease.</b> Second Edition. 8vo,
+with Chromo-lithograph, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Mont Dor&eacute; Cure, and the Proper Way to Use it.</b> 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Pulmonary Consumption</b>: A Practical Treatise on its Cure with Medicinal,
+Dietetic, and Hygienic Remedies. By <span class="smcap">James Weaver</span>, M.D., L.R.C.P. Crown
+8vo, 2s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Croonian Lectures on Some Points in the Pathology and Treatment of
+Typhoid Fever.</b> By <span class="smcap">William Cayley</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the
+Middlesex and the London Fever Hospitals. Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Treatment of Some of the Forms of Valvular Disease of the Heart.</b> By <span class="smcap">A.
+E. Sansom</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 26 Engravings, 4s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9a" id="Page_9a">[Pg 9]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Heart and Aorta:</b> Clinical Lectures. By <span class="smcap">G. W. Balfour</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Edin., late Senior Physician and Lecturer on
+Clinical Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Chromo-lithograph and Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Medical Ophthalmoscopy:</b> A Manual and Atlas. By <span class="smcap">William R. Gowers</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine in University
+College, and Senior Assistant Physician to the Hospital. Second Edition,
+with Coloured Autotype and Lithographic Plates and Woodcuts. 8vo, 18s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis</b>: A Clinical Lecture. 8vo, with
+Engravings and Plate, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diagnosis of Diseases of the Spinal Cord.</b> Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diagnosis of Diseases of the Brain.</b> 8vo, with Engravings, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Diseases of the Nervous System.</b> Vol. I. Diseases of the
+Spinal Cord and Nerves. Roy. 8vo, with 171 Engravings (many figures),
+12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Nervous System.</b> Lectures delivered at Guy's Hospital. By
+<span class="smcap">Samuel Wilks</span>, M.D., F.R.S. Second Edition. 8vo, 18s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Nervous System:</b> Especially in Women. By <span class="smcap">S. Weir
+Mitchell</span>, M.D., Physician to the Philadelphia Infirmary for Diseases of
+the Nervous System. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 8s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Nerve Vibration and Excitation, as Agents in the Treatment of Functional
+Disorder and Organic Disease.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Mortimer Granville</span>, M.D. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Gout in its Clinical Aspects.</b> Crown 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Regimen to be adopted in Cases of Gout.</b> By <span class="smcap">Wilhelm Ebstein</span>, M.D.,
+Professor of Clinical Medicine in G&ouml;ttingen. Translated by <span class="smcap">John Scott</span>,
+M.A., M.B. 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Nervous System.</b> Clinical Lectures. By <span class="smcap">Thomas Buzzard</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the National Hospital for the Paralysed and
+Epileptic. With Engravings, 8vo. 15s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Some Forms of Paralysis from Peripheral Neuritis:</b> of Gouty, Alcoholic,
+Diphtheritic, and other origin. Crown 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Liver:</b> With and without Jaundice. By <span class="smcap">George Harley</span>,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. 8vo, with 2 Plates and 36 Engravings, 21s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Inflammations of the Liver, and their Sequel&aelig;.</b> Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Gout, Rheumatism</b>, And the Allied Affections; with Chapters on Longevity
+and Sleep. By <span class="smcap">Peter Hood</span>, M.D. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Stomach</b>: The Varieties of Dyspepsia, their Diagnosis and
+Treatment. By <span class="smcap">S. O. Habershon</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Third Edition. Crown 8vo,
+5s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Pathology of the Pneumogastric Nerve</b>: Lumleian Lectures for 1876. Second
+Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Abdomen</b>, Comprising those of the Stomach and other parts
+of the Alimentary Canal, (Esophagus, C&aelig;cum, Intestines, and Peritoneum)
+Third Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 21s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Liver</b>, Their Pathology and Treatment. Lettsomian
+Lectures. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Acute Intestinal Strangulation</b>, And Chronic Intestinal Obstruction (Mode
+of Death from). By <span class="smcap">Thomas Bryant</span>, F.R.C.S., Senior Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. 8vo, 3s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Treatise on the Diseases of the Nervous System.</b> By <span class="smcap">James Ross</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition. 2 vols. 8vo, with Lithographs, Photographs, and 332 Woodcuts,
+52s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Handbook of the Diseases of the Nervous System.</b> Roy. 8vo, with 184
+Engravings, 18s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Aphasia</b>: Being a Contribution to the Subject of the Dissolution of
+Speech from Cerebral Disease. 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease.</b> (Gulstonian Lectures.) By <span class="smcap">Seymour J.
+Sharkey</span>, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to, and Joint
+Lecturer on Pathology at, St. Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>On Megrim, Sick Headache, and some Allied Disorders</b>: A Contribution to
+the Pathology of Nerve Storms. By <span class="smcap">E. Liveing</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo, 15s.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10a" id="Page_10a">[Pg 10]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Food and Dietetics</b>, Physiologically and Therapeutically Considered. By
+<span class="smcap">F. W. Pavy</span>, M.D., F.R.S., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Second Edition.
+8vo, 15s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Croonian Lectures on Certain Points connected with Diabetes.</b> 8vo, 4s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Headaches:</b> Their Nature, Causes, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">W. H. Day</span>, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings. [In the Press.</p>
+
+<p><b>Health Resorts at Home and Abroad.</b> By <span class="smcap">Matthew Charteris</span>, M.D., Physician
+to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with Map, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Principal Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts:</b> their Climate and
+Medical Aspect. By <span class="smcap">William Marcet</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. With
+Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Winter and Spring</b> On the Shores of the Mediterranean. By <span class="smcap">Henry Bennet</span>,
+M.D. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with numerous Plates, Maps, and
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Treatment of Pulmonary Consumption</b> by Hygiene, Climate, and Medicine.
+Third Edition. 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Riviera</b>: Sketches of the Health-Resorts of the Coast of France and
+Italy, from Hy&egrave;res to Spezia: its Medical Aspect and Value, &amp;c. By
+<span class="smcap">Edward I. Sparks</span>, M.B., F.R.C.P. Crown 8vo, 8s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Medical Guide to the Mineral Waters of France and its Wintering
+Stations.</b> With a Special Map. By <span class="smcap">A. Vintras</span>, M.D., Physician to the
+French Embassy, and to the French Hospital, London. Crown 8vo, 8s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Ocean as a Health-Resort</b>: A Practical Handbook of the Sea, for the
+use of Tourists and Health-Seekers. By <span class="smcap">William S. Wilson</span>, L.R.C.P.
+Second Edition, with Chart of Ocean Routes, &amp;c. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Ambulance Handbook for Volunteers and Others.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Ardavon Raye</span>, L.K. &amp;
+Q.C.P.I., L.R.C.S.I., late Surgeon to H.B.M. Transport No. 14, Zulu
+Campaign, and Surgeon E.I.R. Rifles. 8vo, with 16 Plates (50 figures),
+3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Ambulance Lectures</b>: To which is added a <span class="smcap">Nursing Lecture</span>. By <span class="smcap">John M. H.
+Martin</span>, Honorary Surgeon to the Blackburn Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with 53
+Engravings, 2s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Handbook of Medical and Surgical Electricity.</b> By <span class="smcap">Herbert Tibbits</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P.E., Senior Physician to the West London Hospital for Paralysis
+and Epilepsy. Second Edition. 8vo, with 95 Engravings, 9s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>How to Use a Galvanic Battery in Medicine and Surgery.</b> Third Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 4s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Map of Ziemssen's Motor Points of the Human Body</b>: A Guide to Localised
+Electrisation. Mounted on Rollers, 35 &times; 21. With 20 Illustrations, 5s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations Delivered at the School of
+Massage and Electricity.</b> Crown 8vo, with Illustrations, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Surgical Emergencies</b>: Together with the Emergencies attendant on
+Parturition and the Treatment of Poisoning. By <span class="smcap">Paul Swain</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the South Devon and East Cornwall Hospital. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with 117 Engravings, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Operative Surgery in the Calcutta Medical College Hospital.</b> Statistics,
+Cases, and Comments. By <span class="smcap">Kenneth McLeod</span>, A.M., M.D., F.R.C.S.E.,
+Surgeon-Major, Indian Medical Service, Professor of Surgery in Calcutta
+Medical College. 8vo, with Illustrations, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Course of Operative Surgery.</b> By Christopher Heath, Surgeon to
+University College Hospital. Second Edition. With 20 coloured Plates
+(180 figures) from Nature, by <span class="smcap">M. L&eacute;veill&eacute;</span>, and several Woodcuts. Large
+8vo, 30s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Surgical Diagnosis.</b> Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+6s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Minor Surgery and Bandaging.</b> For the use of House-Surgeons,
+Dressers, and Junior Practitioners. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 142
+Engravings, 6s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws.</b> Third Edition. 8vo, with Plate and
+206 Wood Engravings, 14s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Injuries and Diseases of the Neck and Head, the Genito-Urinary Organs,
+and the Rectum.</b> Hunterian Lectures, 1885. By <span class="smcap">Edward Lund</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Professor of Surgery in the Owens College, Manchester. 8vo, with Plates
+and Engravings, 4s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11a" id="Page_11a">[Pg 11]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>The Practice of Surgery</b>: A Manual. By Thomas Bryant, Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, with 750 Engravings (many
+being coloured), and including 6 chromo plates, 32s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Surgeon's Vade-Mecum</b>: A Manual of Modern Surgery. By <span class="smcap">R. Druitt</span>,
+F.R.C.S. Twelfth Edition. By <span class="smcap">Stanley Boyd</span>, M.B., F.R.C.S. Assistant
+Surgeon and Pathologist to Charing Cross Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 373
+Engravings 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Regional Surgery</b>: Including Surgical Diagnosis. A Manual for the use of
+Students. By <span class="smcap">F. A. Southam</span>, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to
+the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Part I. The Head and Neck. Crown 8vo,
+6s. 6d.&mdash;Part II. The Upper Extremity and Thorax. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+Part III. The Abdomen and Lower Extremity. Crown 8vo, 7s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Surgical Enquiries</b>: Including the Hastings Essay on Shock, the Treatment
+of Inflammations, and numerous Clinical Lectures. By <span class="smcap">Furneaux Jordan</span>,
+F.R.C.S., Professor of Surgery, Queen's College, Birmingham. Second
+Edition, with numerous Plates. Royal 8vo, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Illustrations of Clinical Surgery.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jonathan Hutchinson</span>, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital. In occasional fasciculi. I. to
+XVIII., 6s. 6d. each. Fasciculi I. to X. bound, with Appendix and Index,
+&pound;3 10s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Pedigree of Disease</b>: Being Six Lectures on Temperament, Idiosyncrasy,
+and Diathesis. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Treatment of Wounds and Fractures.</b> Clinical Lectures. By <span class="smcap">Sampson Gamgee</span>,
+F.R.S.E., Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham. Second Edition.
+8vo, with 40 Engravings, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Electricity and its Manner of Working in the Treatment of Disease.</b> By
+<span class="smcap">Wm. E. Steavenson</span>, M.D., Physician and Electrician to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on Orthop&aelig;dic Surgery.</b> By <span class="smcap">Bernard E. Brodhurst</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Royal Orthop&aelig;dic Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>On Anchylosis, and the Treatment for the Removal of Deformity and the
+Restoration of Mobility in Various Joints.</b> Fourth Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Curvatures and Diseases of the Spine.</b> Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of Bones and Joints.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles Macnamara</span>, F.R.C.S., Surgeon
+to, and Lecturer on Surgery at, the Westminster Hospital. 8vo, with
+Plates and Engravings, 12s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Injuries of the Spine and Spinal Cord</b>, and <b>NERVOUS SHOCK</b>, in their
+Surgical and Medico-Legal Aspects. By <span class="smcap">Herbert W. Page</span>, M.C. Cantab.,
+F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St. Mary's Hospital. Second Edition, post 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Face and Foot Deformities.</b> By <span class="smcap">Frederick Churchill</span>, C.M., Surgeon to the
+Victoria Hospital for Children. 8vo, with Plates and Illustrations, 10s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Clubfoot</b>: Its Causes, Pathology, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">Wm. Adams</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Great Northern Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with 106
+Engravings and 6 Lithographic Plates, 15s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>On Contraction of the Fingers</b>, and its Treatment by Subcutaneous
+Operation; and on Obliteration of Depressed Cicatrices, by the same
+Method. 8vo, with 30 Engravings, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Lateral and other Forms of Curvature of the Spine</b>: Their Pathology and
+Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Lithographic Plates and 72 Wood
+Engravings, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Spinal Curvatures</b>: Treatment by Extension and Jacket; with Remarks on
+some Affections of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle-joints. By <span class="smcap">H. Macnaughton
+Jones</span>, M.D., F.R.C.S. I. and Edin. Post 8vo, with 63 Engravings, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>On Diseases and Injuries of the Eye</b>: A Course of Systematic and Clinical
+Lectures to Students and Medical Practitioners. By <span class="smcap">J. R. Wolf</span>e, M.D.,
+F.R.C.S.E., Lecturer on Ophthalmic Medicine and Surgery in Anderson's
+College, Glasgow. With 10 Coloured Plates and 157 Wood Engravings. 8vo,
+&pound;1 1s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hints on Ophthalmic Out-Patient Practice.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles Higgens</span>, Ophthalmic
+Surgeon to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Short Sight, Long Sight, and Astigmatism.</b> By <span class="smcap">George F. Helm</span>, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., formerly Demonstrator of Anatomy in the Cambridge Medical
+School. Crown 8vo, with 35 Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of the Diseases of the Eye.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles Macnamara</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to Westminster Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with 4
+Coloured Plates and 66 Engravings, 10s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12a" id="Page_12a">[Pg 12]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Diseases of the Eye.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward Nettleship</span>,
+F.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fourth Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings and a Set of Coloured Papers illustrating
+Colour-Blindness, [<i>Nearly Ready.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Normal and Pathological Histology of the Human Eye and Eyelids.</b> By <span class="smcap">C.
+Fred. Pollock</span>, M.D., F.R.C.S. and F.R.S.E., Surgeon for Diseases of the
+Eye to Anderson's College Dispensary, Glasgow. Crown 8vo, with 100
+Plates (230 drawings), 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy.</b> Composed of 12 Chromo-lithographic Plates (59
+Figures drawn from nature) and Explanatory Text. By <span class="smcap">Richard Liebreich</span>,
+M.R.C.S. Translated by <span class="smcap">H. Rosborough Swanzy</span>, M.B. Third edition, 4to,
+40s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Glaucoma</b>: Its Causes, Symptoms, Pathology, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">Priestley
+Smith</span>, M.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham.
+8vo, with Lithographic Plates, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Refraction of the Eye</b>: A Manual for Students. By <span class="smcap">Gustavus Hartridge</span>,
+F.R.C.S., Assistant Physician to the Royal Westminster Ophthalmic
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with Lithographic Plate and 94
+Woodcuts, 5s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Electro-Magnet</b>, And its Employment in Ophthalmic Surgery. By <span class="smcap">Simeon
+Snell</span>, Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Sheffield General Infirmary, &amp;c. Crown
+8vo, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate.</b> By <span class="smcap">Francis Mason</span>, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St.
+Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 6s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Surgery of the Face.</b> 8vo, with 100 Engravings, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Practical Treatise on Aural Surgery.</b> By <span class="smcap">H. Macnaughton Jones</span>, M.D.,
+Professor of the Queen's University in Ireland, late Surgeon to the Cork
+Ophthalmic and Aural Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 63
+Engravings, 8s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Atlas of Diseases of the Membrana Tympani.</b> In Coloured Plates,
+containing 62 Figures, with Text. Crown 4to, 21s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele</b>: Its Etiology, Clinical Characters,
+Pathology, Distribution, Relations to Cretinism, Myx&oelig;dema, &amp;c., and
+Treatment. By <span class="smcap">William Robinson</span>, M.D. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases and Injuries of the Ear.</b> By Sir <span class="smcap">William B. Dalby</span>, Aural Surgeon
+to St. George's Hospital. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 7s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p><i>By the Same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Short Contributions to Aural Surgery</b>, between 1875 and 1886. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Throat and Nose</b>: A Manual. By <span class="smcap">Morell Mackenzie</span>, M.D.
+Lond., Senior Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat.</p>
+
+<p>Vol. II. Diseases of the Nose and Naso-Pharynx; with a Section on
+Diseases of the &OElig;sophagus. Post 8vo, with 93 Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diphtheria</b>: Its Nature and Treatment, Varieties, and Local Expressions.
+8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on Syphilis of the Larynx</b> (Lesions of the Secondary and
+Intermediate Stages). By <span class="smcap">W. M. Whistler</span>, M.D., Physician to the Hospital
+for Diseases of the Throat. Post 8vo, 4s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Sore Throat</b>: Its Nature, Varieties, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">Prosser James</span>,
+M.D., Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat. Fifth
+Edition. Post 8vo, with Coloured Plates and Engravings, 6s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Treatise on Vocal Physiology and Hygiene.</b> By <span class="smcap">Gordon Holmes</span>, M.D.,
+Physician to the Municipal Throat and Ear Infirmary. Second Edition,
+with Engravings. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>A Guide to the Use of the Laryngoscope in General Practice.</b> Crown 8vo,
+with Engravings, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A System of Dental Surgery.</b> By Sir <span class="smcap">John Tomes</span>, F.R.S., and C. S. Tomes,
+M.A., F.R.S. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with many Engravings. [<i>Nearly
+Ready.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Dental Anatomy, Human and Comparative</b>: A Manual. By <span class="smcap">Charles S. Tomes</span>,
+M.A., F.R.S. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 191 Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Student's Guide to Dental Anatomy and Surgery.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry Sewill</span>,
+M.R.C.S., L.D.S. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 5s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Notes on Dental Practice.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry C. Quinby</span>, L.D.S. R.C.S.I. 8vo, with
+87 Engravings, 9s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Mechanical Dentistry in Gold and Vulcanite.</b> By <span class="smcap">F. H. Balkwill</span>, L.D.S.
+R.C.S. 8vo, with 2 Lithographic Plates and 57 Engravings, 10s.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13a" id="Page_13a">[Pg 13]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>A Practical Treatise on Mechanical Dentistry.</b> By <span class="smcap">Joseph Richardson</span>,
+M.D., D.D.S., late Emeritus Professor of Prosthetic Dentistry in the
+Indiana Medical College. Fourth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 458 Engravings,
+21s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Principles and Practice of Dentistry</b>: including Anatomy, Physiology,
+Pathology, Therapeutics, Dental Surgery, and Mechanism. By <span class="smcap">C. A. Harris</span>,
+M.D., D.D.S. Edited by <span class="smcap">F. J. S. Gorgas</span>, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Professor in
+the Dental Department of Maryland University. Eleventh Edition. 8vo,
+with 750 Illustrations, 31s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Manual of Dental Mechanics.</b> By <span class="smcap">Oakley Coles</span>, L.D.S. R.C.S. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Elements of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, with
+Pharmacop&oelig;ia.</b> By <span class="smcap">James Stocken</span>, L.D.S. R.C.S., Pereira Prizeman for
+Materia Medica, and <span class="smcap">Thomas Gaddes</span>, L.D.S. Eng. and Edin. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Dental Medicine</b>: A Manual of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics. By
+<span class="smcap">F. J. S. Gorgas</span>, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Editor of "Harris's Principles and
+Practice of Dentistry," Professor in the Dental Department of Maryland
+University. 8vo, 14s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Atlas of Skin Diseases.</b> By <span class="smcap">Tilbury Fox</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. With 72 Coloured
+Plates. Royal 4to, half morocco, &pound;6 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Skin</b>: With an Analysis of 8,000 Consecutive Cases and a
+Formulary. By <span class="smcap">L. D. Bulkley</span>, M.D., Physician for Skin Diseases at the
+New York Hospital. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Acne: its Etiology, Pathology, and Treatment</b>: Based upon a Study of
+1,500 Cases. 8vo, with Engravings, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>On Certain Rare Diseases of the Skin.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jonathan Hutchinson</span>, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital, and to the Hospital for Diseases
+of the Skin. 8vo, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Skin</b>: A Practical Treatise for the Use of Students and
+Practitioners. By <span class="smcap">J. N. Hyde</span>, A.M., M.D., Professor of Skin and Venereal
+Diseases, Rush Medical College, Chicago. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 17s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Parasites</b>: A Treatise on the Entozoa of Man and Animals, including some
+Account of the Ectozoa. By <span class="smcap">T. Spencer Cobbold</span>, M.D., F.R.S. 8vo, with 85
+Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Manual of Animal Vaccination</b>, preceded by Considerations on Vaccination
+in general. By <span class="smcap">E. Warlomont</span>, M.D., Founder of the State Vaccine
+Institute of Belgium. Translated and edited by <span class="smcap">Arthur J. Harries</span>, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Leprosy in British Guiana.</b> By <span class="smcap">John D. Hillis</span>, F.R.C.S., M.R.I.A.,
+Medical Superintendent of the Leper Asylum, British Guiana. Imp. 8vo,
+with 22 Lithographic Coloured Plates and Wood Engravings, &pound;1 11s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Cancer of the Breast.</b> By <span class="smcap">Thomas W. Nunn</span>, F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to
+the Middlesex Hospital. 4to, with 21 Coloured Plates, &pound;2 2s.</p>
+
+<p><b>On Cancer</b>: Its Allies, and other Tumours; their Medical and Surgical
+Treatment. By <span class="smcap">F. A. Purcell</span>, M.D., M.C., Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital,
+Brompton. 8vo, with 21 Engravings, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Sarcoma and Carcinoma</b>: Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By
+<span class="smcap">Henry T. Butlin</span>, F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, with 4 Plates, 8s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Malignant Disease of the Larynx (Sarcoma and Carcinoma).</b> 8vo, with 5
+Engravings, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Cancerous Affections of the Skin.</b> (Epithelioma and Rodent Ulcer.) By
+<span class="smcap">George Thin</span>, M.D. Post 8vo, with 8 Engravings, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Cancer of the Mouth, Tongue, and Alimentary Tract</b>: their Pathology,
+Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">Frederic B. Jessett</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Clinical Notes on Cancer</b>, Its Etiology and Treatment; with special
+reference to the Heredity-Fallacy, and to the Neurotic Origin of most
+Cases of Alveolar Carcinoma. By <span class="smcap">Herbert L. Snow</span>, M.D. Lond., Surgeon to
+the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on the Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs.</b> By <span class="smcap">Reginald
+Harrison</span>, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition, with 48 Engravings. 8vo, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Hydrocele</b>: Its several Varieties and their Treatment. By <span class="smcap">Samuel Osborn</span>,
+late Surgical Registrar to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Testis.</b> Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14a" id="Page_14a">[Pg 14]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Urinary Organs.</b> Clinical Lectures. By Sir <span class="smcap">Henry
+Thompson</span>, F.R.C.S., Emeritus Professor of Clinical Surgery in University
+College. Seventh (Students') Edition. 8vo, with 84 Engravings, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>By the same Author.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Prostate</b>: Their Pathology and Treatment. Sixth Edition.
+8vo, with 39 Engravings, 6s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Surgery of the Urinary Organs.</b> Some Important Points connected
+therewith. Lectures delivered in the R.C.S. 8vo, with 44 Engravings.
+Students' Edition, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Practical Lithotomy and Lithotrity</b>; or, An Inquiry into the Best Modes
+of Removing Stone from the Bladder. Third Edition. 8vo, with 87
+Engravings, 10s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Preventive Treatment of Calculous Disease</b>, and the Use of Solvent
+Remedies. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Tumours of the Bladder</b>: Their Nature, Symptoms, and Surgical Treatment.
+8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 5s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>Stricture of the Urethra, and Urinary Fistula&aelig;</b>: their Pathology and
+Treatment. Fourth Edition. With 74 Engravings. 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Also.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>The Suprapubic Operation of Opening the Bladder for the Stone and for
+Tumours.</b> 8vo, with 14 Engravings, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Surgery of the Rectum.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry Smith</span>, Professor of Surgery in
+King's College, Surgeon to the Hospital. Fifth Edition. 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Modern Treatment of Stone in the Bladder by Litholopaxy.</b> By <span class="smcap">P. J.
+Freyer</span>, M.A., M.D., M.Ch., Bengal Medical Service. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Testis, Spermatic Cord, and Scrotum.</b> By <span class="smcap">Thomas B.
+Curling</span>, F.R.S., Consulting Surgeon to the London Hospital. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with Engravings, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diseases of the Rectum and Anus.</b> By <span class="smcap">W. Harrison Cripps</span>, F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, &amp;c. 8vo, with 13
+Lithographic Plates and numerous Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Urinary and Renal Derangements and Calculous Disorders.</b> By <span class="smcap">Lionel S.
+Beale</span>, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., Physician to King's College Hospital. 8vo, 5s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Fistula, H&aelig;morrhoids, Painful Ulcer, Stricture, Prolapsus, and other
+Diseases of the Rectum</b>: Their Diagnosis and Treatment. By <span class="smcap">William
+Allingham</span>, Surgeon to St. Mark's Hospital for Fistula. Fourth Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Pathology of the Urine.</b> Including a Complete Guide to its Analysis. By
+<span class="smcap">J. L. W. Thudichum</span>, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition, rewritten and
+enlarged. 8vo, with Engravings, 15s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Student's Primer on the Urine.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Travis Whittaker</span>, M.D., Clinical
+Demonstrator at the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow. With 16 Plates etched on
+Copper. Post 8vo, 4s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis.</b> By <span class="smcap">Alfred Cooper</span>, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the
+Lock Hospital, to St. Mark's and the West London Hospitals. 8vo, 10s.
+6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Genito-Urinary Organs, including Syphilis</b>: A Practical Treatise on their
+Surgical Diseases, for Students and Practitioners. By <span class="smcap">W. H. Van Buren</span>,
+M.D., and <span class="smcap">E. L. Keyes</span>, M.D. Royal 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 21s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Lectures on Syphilis.</b> By <span class="smcap">Henry Lee</span>, Consulting Surgeon to St. George's
+Hospital. 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Diagnosis and Treatment of Syphilis.</b> By <span class="smcap">Tom Robinson</span>, M.D., Physician to
+St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder and Prostate Gland.</b> Sixth Edition. By
+<span class="smcap">Walter J. Coulson</span>, Surgeon to the Lock Hospital and to St. Peter's
+Hospital for Stone. 8vo, 16s.</p>
+
+<p><b>The Medical Adviser in Life Assurance.</b> By Sir <span class="smcap">E. H. Sieveking</span>, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Medical Vocabulary</b>: An Explanation of all Terms and Phrases used in
+the various Departments of Medical Science and Practice, their
+Derivation, Meaning, Application, and Pronunciation. By <span class="smcap">R. G. Mayne</span>,
+M.D., LL.D. Fifth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.</p>
+
+<p><b>A Dictionary of Medical Science</b>: Containing a concise Explanation of the
+various Subjects and Terms of Medicine, &amp;c. By <span class="smcap">Robley Dunglison</span>, M.D.,
+LL.D. Royal 8vo, 28s.</p>
+
+<p><b>Medical Education</b> And Practice in all parts of the World. By <span class="smcap">H. J.
+Hardwicke</span>, M.D., M.R.C.P. 8vo, 10s.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>INDEX.</h2>
+
+
+<p>
+Abercrombie's Medical Jurisprudence, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Adams (W.) on Clubfoot, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Contraction of the Fingers, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Curvature of the Spine, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Alexander's Displacements of the Uterus, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Allan on Fever Nursing, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Outlines of Infectious Diseases, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Allingham on Diseases of the Rectum, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Anatomical Remembrancer, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Balfour's Diseases of the Heart and Aorta, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+Balkwill's Mechanical Dentistry, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Barnes (R.) on Obstetric Operations, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Beale's Microscope in Medicine, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Slight Ailments, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Urinary and Renal Derangements, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Bellamy's Surgical Anatomy, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Bennet (J. H.) on the Mediterranean, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Pulmonary Consumption, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Bentley and Trimen's Medicinal Plants, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Bentley's Manual of Botany, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Structural Botany, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Systematic Botany, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Braune's Topographical Anatomy, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Brodhurst's Anchylosis, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Curvatures, &amp;c., of the Spine, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Orthop&aelig;dic Surgery, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Bryant's Acute Intestinal Strangulation, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Practice of Surgery, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Bucknill and Tuke's Psychological Medicine, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Bulkley's Acne, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases of the Skin, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Burdett's Cottage Hospitals, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pay Hospitals, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Burton's Midwifery for Midwives, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Butlin's Malignant Disease of the Larynx, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sarcoma and Carcinoma, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Buzzard's Diseases of the Nervous System, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Peripheral Neuritis, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Carpenter's Human Physiology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Cayley's Typhoid Fever, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Charteris on Health Resorts, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Practice of Medicine, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Chavers' Diseases of India, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Churchill's Face and Foot Deformities, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Clouston's Lectures on Mental Diseases, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Cobbold on Parasites, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Coles' Dental Mechanics, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Cooper's Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Courty's Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Cripps' Diseases of the Rectum and Anus, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Cullingworth's Manual of Nursing, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Short Manual for Monthly Nurses, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Curling's Diseases of the Testis, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Dalby's Diseases and Injuries of the Ear, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Dalton's Human Physiology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Day on Diseases of Children, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Headaches, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Dobell's Lectures on Winter Cough, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Loss of Weight, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Mont Dor&eacute; Cure, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Domville's Manual for Nurses, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Draper's Text Book of Medical Physics, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Druitt's Surgeon's Vade-Mecum, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Duncan on Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Sterility in Woman, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Dunglison's Medical Dictionary, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+East's Private Treatment of the Insane, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Ebstein on Regimen in Gout, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+Ellis's Diseases of Children, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Emmet's Gyn&aelig;cology, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Fagge's Principles and Practice of Medicine, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Fayrer's Climate and Fevers of India, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Fenwick's Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Medical Diagnosis, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Outlines of Medical Treatment, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Flint on Clinical Medicine, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Principles and Practice of Medicine, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Flower's Diagrams of the Nerves, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Fox's (C. B.) Examinations of Water, Air, and Food, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Fox's (T.) Atlas of Skin Diseases, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Freyer's Litholopaxy, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Frey's Histology and Histo-Chemistry, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Galabin's Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Manual of Midwifery, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Gamgee's Treatment of Wounds and Fractures, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Godlee's Atlas of Human Anatomy, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Goodhart's Diseases of Children, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Gorgas' Dental Medicine, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Gowers' Diseases of the Brain, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases of the Spinal Cord, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Manual of Diseases of Nervous System, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Medical Ophthalmoscopy, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Granville on Gout, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Nerve Vibration and Excitation, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Guy's Hospital Formul&aelig;, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a></span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Habershon's Diseases of the Abdomen, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Liver, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stomach, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pneumogastric Nerve, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Hambleton's What is Consumption?, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Hardwicke's Medical Education, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Harley on Diseases of the Liver, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inflammations of the Liver, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Harris's Dentistry, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Harrison's Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Hartridge's Refraction of the Eye, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Harvey's Manuscript Lectures, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Heath's Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Minor Surgery and Bandaging, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Operative Surgery, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Practical Anatomy, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Surgical Diagnosis, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Helm on Short and Long Sight, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Higgens' Ophthalmic Out-patient Practice, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Hills' Leprosy in British Guiana, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Holden's Dissections, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Human Osteology, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Landmarks, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Holmes' (G.) Guide to Use of Laryngoscope, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Vocal Physiology and Hygiene, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Hood's (D. C.) Diseases and their Commencement, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Hood (P.) on Gout, Rheumatism, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+Hooper's Physician's Vade-Mecum, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Hutchinson's Clinical Surgery, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pedigree of Disease, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Rare Diseases of the Skin, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Hyde's Diseases of the Skin, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+James (P.) on Sore Throat, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Jessett's Cancer of the Mouth, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Jones (C. H.) and Sieveking's Pathological Anatomy, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Jones' (H. McN.) Aural Surgery, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Atlas of Diseases of Membrana Tympani, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Spinal Curvatures, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Jordan's Surgical Enquiries, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Journal of British Dental Association, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Mental Science, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a></span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+King's Manual of Obstetrics, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Lancereaux's Atlas of Pathological Anatomy, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Lee (H.) on Syphilis, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Lewis (Bevan) on the Human Brain, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Liebreich's Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Liveing's Megrim, Sick Headache, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+London Hospital Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+L&uuml;ckes' Hospital Sisters and their Duties, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Lund's Hunterian Lectures, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Macdonald's (J. D.) Examination of Water and Air, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Mackenzie on Diphtheria, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Diseases of the Throat and Nose, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a></span><br />
+<br />
+McLeod's Operative Surgery, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+MacMunn's Spectroscope in Medicine, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Macnamara's Diseases of the Eye, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Bones and Joints, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Marcet's Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Martin's Ambulance Lectures, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Mason on Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Surgery of the Face, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Mayne's Medical Vocabulary, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Middlesex Hospital Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Mitchell's Diseases of the Nervous System, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+Moore's Family Medicine for India, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Manual of the Diseases of India, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Morris' (H.) Anatomy of the Joints, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Mouat and Snell on Hospitals, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Nettleship's Diseases of the Eye, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Nunn's Cancer of the Breast, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Ogston's Medical Jurisprudence, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Ophthalmic (Royal London) Hospital Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Ophthalmological Society's Transactions, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Oppert's Hospitals, Infirmaries, Dispensaries, &amp;c., <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Osborn on Diseases of the Testis, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Hydrocele, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Owen's Materia Medica, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Page's Injuries of the Spine, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Parkes' Practical Hygiene, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Pavy on Diabetes, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Pavy on Food and Dietetics, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Pharmaceutical Journal, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Pharmacop&oelig;ia of the London Hospital, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Phillips' Materia Medica and Therapeutics, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Pollock's Histology of the Eye and Eyelids, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Porritt's Intra-Thoracic Effusion, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Purcell on Cancer, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Pye-Smith's Syllabus of Physiology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Quinby's Notes on Dental Practice, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Raye's Ambulance Handbook, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Reynolds' (J. J.) Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Notes on Midwifery, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Richardson's Mechanical Dentistry, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Roberts' (C.) Manual of Anthropometry, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Detection of Colour-Blindness, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Roberts' (D. Lloyd) Practice of Midwifery, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Robinson (Tom) on Syphilis, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Robinson (W.) on Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Ross's Aphasia, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases of the Nervous System, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Handbook of ditto, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Routh's Infant Feeding, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Royal College of Surgeons Museum Catalogues, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Royle and Harley's Materia Medica, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+St. Bartholomew's Hospital Catalogue, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+St. George's Hospital Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+St. Thomas's Hospital Reports, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Sansom's Valvular Disease of the Heart, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Savage on the Female Pelvic Organs, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Sewill's Dental Anatomy, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Sharkey's Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease, <a href='#Page_9a'>9</a><br />
+<br />
+Shore's Elementary Practical Biology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Sieveking's Life Assurance, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Smith's (E.) Clinical Studies, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases in Children, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Smith's (Henry) Surgery of the Rectum, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Smith's (Heywood) Dysmenorrh&oelig;a, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Smith (Priestley) on Glaucoma, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Snell's Electro-Magnet in Ophthalmic Surgery, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Snow's Clinical Notes on Cancer, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Southam's Regional Surgery, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Sparks on the Riviera, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Squire's Companion to the Pharmacop&oelig;ia, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pharmacop&oelig;ias of London Hospitals</span><br />
+<br />
+Starkweather on the Law of Sex, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Steavenson's Electricity, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+Still&eacute; and Maisch's National Dispensatory, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Stocken's Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Sutton's General Pathology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Swain's Surgical Emergencies, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Swayne's Obstetric Aphorisms, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Taylor's Poisons in relation to Medical Jurisprudence, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Teale's Dangers to Health, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a><br />
+<br />
+Thin's Cancerous Affections of the Skin, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Thomas's Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+Thompson's (Sir H.) Calculous Disease, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases of the Prostate, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Diseases of the Urinary Organs, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lithotomy and Lithotrity, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stricture of the Urethra, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Suprapubic Operation, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Surgery of the Urinary Organs, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Tumours of the Bladder, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Thorowgood on Asthma, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">on Materia Medica and Therapeutics, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Thudichum's Pathology of the Urine, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Tibbits' Medical and Surgical Electricity, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Map of Motor Points, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">How to use a Galvanic Battery, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a>;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Tilt's Change of Life, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Uterine Therapeutics, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Tirard's Prescriber's Pharmacop&oelig;ia, <a href='#Page_7a'>7</a><br />
+<br />
+Tomes' (C. S.) Dental Anatomy, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Tomes' (J. and C. S.) Dental Surgery, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Tuke's Influence of the Mind upon the Body, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Van Buren on the Genito-Urinary Organs, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Vintras on the Mineral Waters, &amp;c., of France, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Virchow's Post-mortem Examinations, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Wagstaffe's Human Osteology, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Waring's Indian Bazaar Medicines, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Practical Therapeutics, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Warlomont's Animal Vaccination, <a href='#Page_13a'>13</a><br />
+<br />
+Warner's Guide to Medical Case-Taking, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Waters' (A. T. H.) Diseases of the Chest, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Weaver's Pulmonary Consumption, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Wells' (Spencer) Abdominal Tumours, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Ovarian and Uterine Tumours, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a></span><br />
+<br />
+West and Duncan's Diseases of Women, <a href='#Page_6a'>6</a><br />
+<br />
+West's (S.) How to Examine the Chest, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Whistler's Syphilis of the Larynx, <a href='#Page_12a'>12</a><br />
+<br />
+Whittaker's Primer on the Urine, <a href='#Page_14a'>14</a><br />
+<br />
+Wilks' Diseases of the Nervous System, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+<br />
+Williams' (Roger) Influence of Sex, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Wilson's (Sir E.) Anatomists' Vade-Mecum, <a href='#Page_3a'>3</a><br />
+<br />
+Wilson's (G.) Handbook of Hygiene, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a>;<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Healthy Life and Dwellings, <a href='#Page_5a'>5</a></span><br />
+<br />
+Wilson's (W. S.) Ocean as a Health-Resort, <a href='#Page_10a'>10</a><br />
+<br />
+Wolfe's Diseases and Injuries of the Eye, <a href='#Page_11a'>11</a><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Year Book of Pharmacy, <a href='#Page_2a'>2</a><br />
+<br />
+Yeo's (G. F.) Manual of Physiology, <a href='#Page_4a'>4</a><br />
+<br />
+Yeo's (J. B.) Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, <a href='#Page_8a'>8</a><br />
+</p>
+
+
+<p>The following <span class="smcap">Catalogues</span> issued by <span class="smcap">J. &amp; A. Churchill</span> will be forwarded
+post free on application:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p><b>A.</b> <i>J. &amp; A. Churchill's General List of about 650 works on Anatomy,
+Physiology, Hygiene, Midwifery, Materia Medica, Medicine, Surgery,
+Chemistry, Botany, &amp;c., &amp;c., with a complete Index to their Subjects,
+for easy reference.</i> N.B.&mdash;<i>This List includes</i> B, C, &amp; D.</p>
+
+<p><b>B.</b> <i>Selection from J. &amp; A. Churchill's General List, comprising all
+recent Works published by them on the Art and Science of Medicine.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>C.</b> <i>J. &amp; A. Churchill's Catalogue of Text Books specially arranged for
+Students.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>D.</b> <i>A selected and descriptive List of J. &amp; A. Churchill's Works on
+Chemistry, Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the
+Microscope, and other branches of Science.</i></p>
+
+<p><b>E.</b> <i>The Half-yearly List of New Works and New Editions published by J. &amp;
+A. Churchill during the previous six months, together with particulars
+of the Periodicals issued from their House.</i></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>[Sent in January and July of each year to every Medical
+Practitioner in the United Kingdom whose name and address
+can be ascertained. A large number are also sent to the
+United States of America, Continental Europe, India, and the
+Colonies.]</p></div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">America.</span>&mdash;<i>J. &amp; A. Churchill being in constant communication with
+various publishing houses in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, are
+able, notwithstanding the absence of international copyright, to conduct
+negotiations favourable to English Authors.</i></p>
+
+
+<p class="center">
+LONDON: 11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET.<br />
+<i>Pardon &amp; Sons, Printers,] [Wine Office Court, Fleet Street, E.C.</i><br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35639-h.htm or 35639-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/6/3/35639/
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/35639-h/images/cover.jpg b/35639-h/images/cover.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..01e576c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/images/cover.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h/images/fig1.jpg b/35639-h/images/fig1.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..70e2d47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/images/fig1.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h/images/fig2.jpg b/35639-h/images/fig2.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4629499
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/images/fig2.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h/images/fig3.jpg b/35639-h/images/fig3.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0b80f1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/images/fig3.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639-h/images/title.jpg b/35639-h/images/title.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..acc3f88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639-h/images/title.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35639.txt b/35639.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a15b0a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6802 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Schweigger on Squint
+ A Monograph by Dr. C. Schweigger
+
+Author: C. Schweigger
+
+Editor: Gustavus Hartridge
+
+Translator: Emily J. Robinson
+
+Release Date: March 20, 2011 [EBook #35639]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON SQUINT
+
+A MONOGRAPH
+
+BY
+
+DR. C. SCHWEIGGER,
+
+PROFESSOR OF OPHTHALMOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN
+
+TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN
+
+BY
+
+EMILY J. ROBINSON
+
+EDITED BY
+
+GUSTAVUS HARTRIDGE, F.R.C.S.
+
+LONDON
+J. & A. CHURCHILL
+11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET
+1887
+
+
+
+
+TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE
+
+
+The subject of Squint is so interesting that we venture to think an
+English rendering of this exhaustive monograph will be acceptable to
+many ophthalmic surgeons and students.
+
+While adhering as far as possible to the spirit and style of the
+original we have not hesitated here and there to give a somewhat free
+translation. This has been partly necessitated by the difficulty of
+finding an exact equivalent in English for all the terms used in the
+original text.
+
+In the German Edition the old system of inches is used. We have (with
+the consent of the author) altered these to the dioptric system.
+
+ E. J. R.
+ G. H.
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+_Amicus Plato, amicus Socrates, magis amica veritas._ May my friends and
+colleagues, whose views differ from mine, read the following
+observations without prejudice. A fact, which does not agree with the
+system, is generally worth more than theory, still it is very difficult
+for even the most important fact to find recognition if it contradicts
+received opinion. For theories and dogmas are narcotics, which are
+necessary to men; some flatter themselves by composing them, while
+others content themselves by satisfying their own craving for a creed.
+Reasonably applied, they may be useful, but the boundary line is only
+too easily over-stepped. It is the task of science to observe also
+whether theories correspond with the progress of facts. The present
+reigning theory on strabismus will have to submit to various
+limitations; on the other hand, we are ready to leave to the scholastic
+science of medicine and its followers certain dogmas which remain
+unproved and which have nothing but the fact of their existence to
+recommend them.
+
+The small compass of the following treatise proves that it was not
+intended to exhaust the rich literature on the subject; I have only
+referred to the same where it appeared to me necessary for the interest
+of the work in hand.
+
+Above all, it has been my endeavour to treat the subject of this
+treatise (which occurs so frequently in practice) in a way intelligible
+to every physician, at the same time, however, to bring sufficiently
+into notice those facts and views which are of value to my special
+colleagues.
+
+ C. SCHWEIGGER.
+
+ BERLIN.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX TO CONTENTS.
+
+
+INTRODUCTION. PAGES
+
+Ordinary use of the word squint and its meaning. Apparent
+squint. Paralytic and typical squint. Law of association.
+Squint angle and linear measure of the deviation.
+Permanent, periodic, latent, monolateral, and alternating
+squint 1-8
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+Donders' theory and the test of it by statistics. Limits
+of error in the subjective and objective determination of
+hypermetropia. Statistics of convergent squint. Hypermetropia
+and favouring circumstances. Participation
+of the accommodation. Preponderance of the interni
+and insufficiency of the externi. Nebulae of the cornea. 9-26
+
+PERIODIC CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+In myopia, emmetropia, and hypermetropia. Intermittent
+squint. Accommodative squint 27-35
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT IN MYOPIA 36-38
+
+SQUINT FROM PARALYSIS OF THE ABDUCENS 39-40
+
+HYSTERICAL SQUINT 41-43
+
+DIVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+Absolute and relative divergence. Statistics of divergent
+squint. Causes 44-49
+
+DYNAMIC SQUINT, INSUFFICIENCY OF THE INTERNI AND
+MUSCULAR ASTHENOPIA.
+
+Diplopia and power of overcoming prisms. Facultative
+divergence. Dynamic absolute divergence. Parallel
+strabismus. Relative divergence in myopia. Muscular
+asthenopia. Dynamic relative divergence. Treatment
+of muscular asthenopia 50-63
+
+BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT.
+
+Single vision in squint. Theory of exclusion. Forms of
+binocular vision in squint 64-74
+
+VISUAL ACUTENESS OF THE SQUINTING EYE.
+
+The trial of vision and its results. Appearance, diagnosis.
+Peculiarities and statistics of congenital defective vision.
+Relation of the same to defective vision in squint 75-104
+
+CURE OF SQUINT.
+
+Spontaneous cure. Voluntary loss of the habit. Cure of
+convergent squint by means of convex glasses. Strabotomy.
+Tenotomy. Advancement. Result of the
+operation and choice of methods. After-treatment by
+means of influence on the ocular muscles and on the
+accommodation. Aim of more extended results of the
+operation. Artificial strabismus. Operation for periodic
+convergent squint. Strabotomy in homonymous diplopia.
+Operation for squint after paralysis of the abducens.
+Operation for divergent squint and for periodic divergence.
+Degree of the result of the operation. Determination
+on the age best suited for operation 105-141
+
+
+
+
+SQUINT
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+
+By squinting, in the German vocabulary, is understood every oblique
+direction of the visual axes. We prefer that the eyes which turn towards
+us should do so in a straight line, and feel it to be something ugly and
+out of harmony, if anyone squints at us. AEsthetic feeling is, however,
+too individual and uncertain a guide to be laid down as a foundation for
+the decision of questions of medicine. Parents have repeatedly brought
+to me children said to squint, when frequent and careful examination of
+them showed normal position of the eyes and perfect binocular vision;
+the over-anxious parents had taken mere physiological convergence or
+side glances for squinting.
+
+On the other hand, cases appear in which such a strong semblance of
+squinting is present, that at the first glance one cannot say whether
+absolute fixation takes place or not. A very simple examination suffices
+to determine these doubts:--Cause the patient to gaze at a certain point
+on the horizon and cover first one eye and then the other. If the
+covered eye remains stationary, no squint exists, but if it is observed
+that when giving one eye its freedom and covering the other, the first
+must make a movement in order to fix the object to be looked at, it is
+only a question of discovering whether the squint does not simply ensue
+from the covering up of the eye. We will return to these cases at
+greater length, in order to occupy ourselves now with the fact, that the
+examination above referred to proves the non-existence of strabismus,
+while appearance still allows us to suspect its existence.
+
+This apparent contradiction finds its explanation in the fact that the
+scientific notion of squinting is determined by the direction of the
+visual axes. Strabismus is present when one eye only is directed to the
+fixed point, while the visual line of the other eye deviates from it.
+
+But we cannot see the direction of the visual line, we can only judge of
+it from the position of the cornea. It is exactly that line which joins
+the point fixed with the centre of the fovea centralis. We can determine
+the position of the cornea by a perpendicular line passing through the
+centre of the cornea; this does not coincide with the visual line but
+deviates from it about 5 deg. outwards. In the case of parallel lines of
+vision the corneae are directed slightly outwards, a position which we
+are accustomed to consider as the normal one. If the angle formed by the
+above-mentioned perpendicular and the visual line is larger than usual,
+_i. e._ if the corneae move further outwards than usual, the unusual
+appearance strikes us, and gives us the impression of a divergent
+squint. The enlargement of this angle, which is usually indicated as
+Angle a, is a peculiarity of the hypermetropic eye; and where we have an
+apparent divergent squint we may expect to find also hypermetropia,
+while an apparent convergent squint occurs occasionally in myopia of
+high degree.
+
+If we turn now to those cases in which a real deviation of the visual
+line occurs, we must first consider the cause, and afterwards
+distinguish it from paralysis of the ocular muscles. The faulty position
+may be constantly present or it may only occur when the paralysed muscle
+is called into action. It is almost invariably combined with double
+vision; sometimes the latter is the prevailing symptom, whilst the
+faulty position of the eye is in no way obtrusive, and can only be
+proved by careful investigation.
+
+In contrast to paralysis of the ocular muscles stands the typical
+concomitant squint, in which the squinting eye normally accompanies the
+movements of the other. Transitional forms may thus be brought about, in
+some of which the paralysis recovers, with complete or almost complete
+restoration of movement, but with continuance of the squint. On the
+other hand, in concomitant strabismus, restriction of movement towards
+the opposite side not unfrequently develops itself.
+
+This impairment of movement has its origin generally in a want of use.
+Those who squint have less need for movement, since one of their eyes is
+already directed obliquely. In divergent strabismus this is apparent,
+but in convergent strabismus the squinting eye governs the field of
+vision on the side to which it turns. When the fixing eye is turned
+towards the side of the squinting eye in convergent strabismus, the
+latter, it is true, makes a concomitant movement, which does not,
+however, bring it by a long way to the limit of the movement of which it
+is capable. The defect of motion is therefore generally present in both
+eyes, and is usually most marked in the squinting eye. Often, indeed,
+there is present at the same time a congenital or acquired insufficiency
+of the antagonistic muscle, but that want of use has also much to do
+with it, is shown by the improvement of mobility that often follows even
+short practice.
+
+From the law of equal innervation, which governs the movements of the
+eyes, it follows that the fixing eye lapses into the associated
+deviation as soon as the squinting eye is directed straight forwards.
+If, for example, a convergent squinting eye is put into fixation, an
+innervation of the external rectus, with which just as strong an
+associated contraction of the internal rectus of the other eye, is
+called forth; the direction of the squint then, as well as the degree of
+deviation, is transferred from one eye to the other. It is naturally the
+same with divergent squint.
+
+Squinting upwards or downwards seldom occurs as a symptom by itself;
+more frequently it is associated with convergent or divergent squint.
+
+According to the law of associated movements, when an eye squinting
+upwards is put into fixation, the other eye should make a movement
+downwards, as normally both eyes move together up and down, yet this is
+not always the case. For example, when an upward deviation is present in
+convergent squint, it not uncommonly follows that the secondary
+deviation of the eye which usually fixes is also inwards and upwards;
+only exceptionally in cases of deviation in height of the squinting eye
+does the sympathetic movement take place without change of height.
+Sometimes with deviation of height, I found combined a distinct rotation
+of the eye, generally thus, that together with the movement upwards was
+combined a rotation of the vertical meridian outwards and _vice versa_;
+in fixing the eye a rolling inwards was combined with the movement
+downwards. The other eye then usually showed a similar rotation (thus
+the meridian of both eyes rotated simultaneously to the right or left),
+but the deviation in height was not always the same.
+
+The law of equal innervation requires in alternate fixation, first with
+one eye, then with the other, that the same degree of deviation be
+transferred to the non-fixing eye. When exceptions appear, and the
+deviation in the two eyes is unequal, it is (provided the inequality has
+not been caused by attempted operation, or is the result of paralysis),
+usually to be explained by the fact, that an accommodative movement
+takes place when we are expecting an associated one. For example, if
+there is convergent squint and hypermetropia in both eyes, but more
+hypermetropia in one than the other, in alternate fixation it will be
+found that the least hypermetropic eye always undergoes the greatest
+deviation, because in fixation with the more hypermetropic eye a
+stronger effort of accommodation unites itself with a corresponding
+innervation of the internal rectus, which is transferred equally to the
+other and non-fixing eye. Thus it happens frequently in divergent
+strabismus, when one eye is myopic, the other emmetropic. If the latter
+fixes an object stationed near the "far point" of the myopic eye, the
+internal recti and the accommodation act simultaneously; on the other
+hand if the myopic eye fixes, it wants no accommodation and the
+emmetropic eye sinks into divergence.
+
+With regard to the immutability of the squint; it must not be understood
+that the squint angle always remains the same with the same individual;
+in most cases the amount of deviation varies, the squint is now less,
+now greater; it is desirable however, to know the bounds within which it
+fluctuates.
+
+To determine the degree of the squint one can either ascertain the angle
+of the squint, or use v. Graefe's so-called linear measure of deviation.
+
+The squint angle is that angle, which the visual line of the squinting
+eye encloses with the direction it ought normally to take--it may be
+measured with the aid of a perimeter. The patient's head is so placed by
+means of a chin rest, that the axis of the squinting eye is in the
+centre of the arc of the perimeter; a distant point in the centre of the
+field of vision is fixed. Behind the patient is a candle, the reflection
+of which is thrown into the squinting eye by means of a plane mirror;
+now slide the mirror along the arc of the perimeter, till the reflection
+on the cornea stands in the centre of the pupil of the eye which is
+under observation. The point which the mirror occupies on the arc of the
+perimeter, indicates the squint angle. In deviation in height of the
+squinting eye, bring the arc of the perimeter into the corresponding
+direction and so measure at the same time the degree of deviation in
+height. Were the method more exact than it is, one would be able to
+measure the angle formed by the visual line and the axis of the cornea.
+
+To find the linear measure of the deviation, cover the fixing eye and
+allow the squinting eye to fix. Hold a millimetre measure close to the
+under lid, so that a chosen portion of it stands under the centre of the
+pupil; uncover the other eye and when the squinting eye returns to its
+deviation, it can be seen over which point the centre of the pupil
+stands, and the linear measure of the deviation is thus obtained. The
+secondary deviation of the other eye is measured of course in the same
+way. If, in consequence of amblyopia, the squinting eye possesses no
+certain fixation, the measure may be so held that the _nil_ point of the
+division coincides with the lower punctum, and then in unchanged
+fixation the portion lying under the centre of the pupil is determined,
+first in the sound and then in the squinting eye.
+
+The execution of one or other of these forms of measurement is in every
+case to be recommended, and if their exactness is not as perfect as can
+be desired, still, on the other hand it should be remembered, that for
+surgical treatment, an exact measurement of the deviation does not
+possess the importance sometimes assigned to it, as in most cases the
+squint angle shows considerable variations.
+
+In a large number of cases these variations are so great, that a correct
+position of the eyes alternates with a more or less considerable squint,
+which as the case may be, appears seldom or often, sometimes only under
+certain conditions, and sometimes quite unexpectedly (periodic squint).
+In some cases stationary or permanent squint begins with the periodic
+form, however, one must not conclude that periodic squint is invariably
+the precursor of the permanent form. In by far the greater number of
+cases periodic squint continues unchanged without ever becoming
+permanent.
+
+The transition from squint to the normal condition is formed by those
+cases, in which the proper position of the eyes is maintained by a
+desire for binocular single vision, while the elastic tensions of the
+muscles are such, that squinting sets in as soon as binocular single
+vision is rendered impossible (latent squint).
+
+The squint is generally one sided (monolateral), for the eyes in this
+case are usually of unequal value, and the best is always preferred for
+use. The eye which has the acuter vision is always made use of when
+something has to be carefully observed. But when the acuteness of vision
+is equal, and one eye is emmetropic and the other hypermetropic, or if
+both are hypermetropic but in varying degree, the most hypermetropic eye
+is always the squinting one; for with a greater power of accommodation
+it does not accomplish more than the emmetropic or less hypermetropic
+one with slighter expenditure of strength. Why should a man strain his
+accommodation when no advantage is thereby gained?
+
+In most cases the squinting eye has also an available power of vision
+and is on that account used for fixing objects which lie in the
+direction of its visual axis; it can also be made to fix objects in
+front, this occurs as soon as the other eye is covered; it remains as
+the fixing eye till the next blinking of the lids, or movement to
+another object for fixation, or till both eyes are closed for a short
+time, when it returns to its former deviation.
+
+A true alternating strabismus, _i. e._ alternate use of first one eye
+and then the other to fix objects straight ahead, only occurs when both
+eyes are of equal value as regards weakness and acuteness of vision, or
+when one is more conveniently used for near, and the other for distant
+vision. In these circumstances one eye is always short-sighted and is
+used for near objects, while the other is emmetropic (or in less degree
+near-sighted or long-sighted) and is preferred for distant things. The
+reason for the alternation lies in the necessity for the act of vision
+itself; it begins regularly whenever distant and near objects are
+alternately fixed. Alternating squint is usually divergent, with short
+sight on one side, still convergent strabismus may occur under these
+conditions.
+
+
+
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT
+
+
+To Donders belongs the merit of having pointed out the presence of
+hypermetropia in about two thirds of all cases of convergent strabismus.
+The fact is undeniable, the theories built upon it are doubtful. Donders
+declares no other conclusion to be possible, than this, that the
+hypermetropia is the cause of the squint. "To see clearly, the
+hypermetrope must accommodate vigorously for each distance. In looking
+even at distant objects he must overcome his hypermetropia by exerting
+his accommodation, and in proportion as the object approaches him, he
+must add to it as much accommodation as the normal emmetropic eye would
+use. The inspection of near objects requires then a special amount of
+exertion. There exists, however, a certain connection between
+accommodation and convergence of the visual lines. The stronger one
+converges the more one has to put into action the accommodation. A
+certain tendency to convergence cannot then be absent during any effort
+of the faculty of accommodation."
+
+Right as these conclusions may appear, and as they really are, as far as
+emmetropia is concerned, they leave out of sight the fact, that the
+connection between accommodation and convergence is an individual and
+acquired one. The weak side of the theory lies in the fact, that that
+relation between accommodation and convergence which is developed in
+emmetropia in consequence of daily practice, is given as being in itself
+normal and the one for all conditions of refraction. The relation
+between accommodation and convergence depends on the state of
+refraction, and alters with any of its changes in the course of life. In
+proportion as myopia is gradually developed in originally existing
+emmetropia, myopes learn to converge to the neighbourhood of their far
+point without allowing their accommodation to come into action. With
+hypermetropia it is just the contrary. By far the greater number of
+hypermetropes learn to use their accommodation without difficulty, even
+with parallel lines of vision, for they see distant objects clearly,
+while they neutralise their hypermetropia by accommodation, without
+sacrificing the parallelism of the visual lines.
+
+It is important to notice that Donders' theory makes convergent squint
+appear as almost a necessary consequence of hypermetropia. According to
+Donders, hypermetropes have to choose between the advantages of
+binocular vision with an effort of accommodation corresponding to the
+hypermetropia, and relief to the accommodation by too strong convergence
+with the sacrifice of binocular fixation; and the decision will tend to
+the latter condition, if circumstances exist which deprecate the value
+of binocular vision.
+
+The demand for binocular fusion of the retinal images will be greater if
+both eyes are of equal value; on the contrary it will be less, if the
+retinal image or the visual acuteness of one eye is less perfect than
+that of the other. Varieties of weakness; when one eye always receives a
+clear retinal image, the other an indistinct one; lowering of the visual
+acuteness of one eye by nebulae, astigmatism or any other cause.
+According to Donders all these furnish a reason why, in existing
+hypermetropia, binocular fixation should be abandoned and convergent
+strabismus developed.
+
+It cannot be denied that the relation existing between convergent
+strabismus and hypermetropia may be as Donders represents it; the only
+question is, whether it really is so. A theory may appear very
+acceptable, and may rest on a firm physiological basis; it will,
+however, be more perfect if it answers to facts. Physiological
+possibility is not always pathological reality, for other unusual causes
+besides physiological ones acquire value, and so things become
+pathological. If Donders' theory is right, convergent strabismus must
+really begin, as soon as double hypermetropia meets with causes which
+depreciate the value of binocular vision. The theory may be tested then
+by statistics, which confront the cases of hypermetropia and convergent
+strabismus with those cases in which hypermetropia meets with Donders'
+conditions and normal binocular vision still remains.
+
+The statistics, which I have collected, relate to all the cases which
+have appeared in my private practice during the last ten years. The
+number would be much more considerable if I had included the patients of
+the University Clinic; however, the reliability of the single elements
+of which the statistics are composed was to me more important than the
+number. In my private practice I have myself examined every case with
+reference to these statistics for at least five years.
+
+In a large clinic, where more than 5000 new patients annually come under
+treatment, one must frequently content oneself by satisfying the demands
+of the moment; thus the sources of inaccuracy in the statistics would be
+augmented.
+
+Included in the statistics were not merely the cases which came under
+treatment for squint, but all in which squinting was present or those in
+which it could be objectively proved (for example, by scars left by
+previous operations for squint), that squint had formerly existed.
+
+Further, in the following statistics, only those cases were included,
+where an exact determination of the amount of error was possible; in
+most cases this was also verified objectively with the ophthalmoscope.
+In many cases, especially in children, the objective determination of
+refraction alone is possible, and is practicable only with the greatest
+difficulty and by the use of atropine.
+
+Those cases deserve particular mention, in which it remained doubtful
+whether hypermetropia of slight degree or emmetropia was present. Even
+in full visual acuteness it is not unusual that with weak convex glasses
+(of less than a dioptre) binocular vision is just as clear as with the
+naked eyes, while in monocular investigation convex glasses cause a
+slight indistinctness of vision. Are we to recognise hypermetropia here
+or not? Opposed to the objection that in covering one eye the
+hypermetropia is more easily neutralised by accommodation, stands the
+observation that binocular is, as a rule, clearer than monocular vision,
+wherefore, in the usual method for testing the sight, unless special
+precautions are taken, full binocular visual acuteness does not prove
+the presence of absolutely distinct retinal images. These doubts arise
+much oftener in lowered visual acuteness. All conclusions which we
+derive from visual acuteness become very inexact as soon as it is
+lowered. In such cases, in determining anomalies of refraction we are
+accustomed to consider the strongest convex--relatively, the weakest
+concave glass, with which the visual acuteness individually present is
+reached, as the most correct expression of the hypermetropia or myopia,
+and with good reason if it is a case of ordering spectacles, as all
+sources of error in the method of examination are then avoided as far as
+possible; but it is quite another question if in such cases an exact
+measurement of the amount of error is required solely for diagnostic
+purposes; investigation with the ophthalmoscope is then alone decisive
+and furnishes proof at the same time of how unreliable the determination
+of the error by testing the vision is, in cases of short sight. One can
+realise this most readily in cases of myopia with congenital amblyopia;
+one gets frequently with the most exact correction possible of the
+objectively determined myopia no better visual acuteness than with a
+very imperfect one. In one case, for instance, which I have repeatedly
+examined in the course of years, the degree of myopia determinable by
+means of the ophthalmoscope amounted to at least 6.5 D., while the
+weakest concave glass with which the full visual acuteness of 5/24 was
+attainable was 2.5 D. Under these circumstances, if one relies merely on
+the trial of vision, the degree of myopia appears too small, that of the
+hypermetropia, on the contrary, just as much too great.
+
+But even the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction has its limits of
+error. It is a question of determining the conditions under which the
+image of the fundus of the eye still appears distinct. We will except
+those circumstances which prevent our obtaining a clear erect image of
+the fundus of the eye, as, for example, high degrees of astigmatism,
+nebulae, &c.--even under normal circumstances the fundus of the eye does
+not always present such sharply-defined lines, that one could form a
+perfectly safe opinion from the clearness of the image.
+
+When we call the ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction objective, we
+only mean to say that we count the subjective opinion of the patient to
+be of less value, than that of the physician who examines him. The
+determination of the glass even, with which we believe we are able
+distinctly to see the fundus of the eye, is also an objective one.
+Whoever, for instance, is firmly convinced that convergent strabismus
+depends on hypermetropia, will, in doubtful cases, very easily carry his
+subjective conviction into the objective examination, and will still see
+clearly the fundus of even an emmetropic eye with a weak convex
+glass--the objective signs for the clearness of the image have no
+absolutely defined limits. But apart from this, other sources of error
+are possible. A person using the ophthalmoscope, for instance, who,
+without knowing it--and such a thing may happen--possesses a slight
+degree of latent hypermetropia, will find his own hypermetropia
+everywhere, just also as a myope, who deceives himself slightly about
+the degree of his myopia in the calculation of the ophthalmoscopic
+diagnosis of refraction, lays rather too high a value on his own myopia.
+
+Finally it must be added, that if the ophthalmoscopic estimation of
+refraction is to be exact, mydriasis by atropine is required, when, as
+is known, even emmetropic eyes may show a slight degree of
+hypermetropia. Enough, we must not over-rate the value of the objective
+determination of the error of refraction, and I would estimate the limit
+of error at half a dioptre at least. If the examination is rendered more
+difficult, as is frequently the case with children, by a restless and
+impatient demeanour of the patient, even the objective diagnosis may
+afford very doubtful results; such cases were, of course, excluded from
+the statistics. Moreover, ophthalmoscopic determination of the error in
+convergent strabismus is specially difficult, for one cannot advise the
+patient as to a suitable direction for the eye not under investigation.
+It is generally best to keep the eye not under investigation closed.
+
+In practice it is immaterial whether emmetropia or a minimum degree of
+hypermetropia is present; for statistics essentially devoted to
+theoretical questions it seemed more suitable to unite these cases in a
+separate group.
+
+Accurately taken, the statistics should give the condition of refraction
+at the age at which the squint begins. But, if there is a thankless
+task, it is that of examining the erect image in children from two to
+three years of age. To furnish accurate results this method requires a
+certain tractability on the patient's side, which is never present at
+this age, and not always in adults. A number of the cases surveyed in
+the following table also came under observation long after the squint
+commenced, and in some short-sighted persons in particular, the degree
+of myopia at the time when squinting began, may have been less than it
+was at the time of the examination.
+
+Further, it seemed to me desirable to keep periodic, separate from
+permanent squint; this, however, could not be accomplished with
+exactness. It may easily happen that children with periodic squint
+always squint just when one sees them, and in those cases which had
+already been operated on when they came to be examined, it was quite
+impossible to determine whether periodic or permanent squint had
+formerly been present. Therefore I have represented separately in each
+particular group the number of those previously operated on.
+
+In the following table the refraction of the fixing eye and the visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye are given. In alternating squint the
+refraction of the emmetropic eye was taken, as determining it for
+insertion in the lower division of the statistics.
+
+A. Convergent squint with myopia:
+ 1. Slight myopia to M. = 1.75 D.
+ (_a_) Permanent squint 11 cases (3 previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases (one with M.
+ 1.25 D. of the fixing, M. 4 D. of the squinting eye;
+ the other with M. 1.25 D. of the fixing, H. 4 D. and
+ V. = 1 of the squinting eye). The examination of
+ the visual acuteness of the squinting eye showed:
+ V. more than 1/7 4 cases.
+ V. 1/12 - 1/18 1 case.
+ V. 1/24 - 1/36 1 case.
+ V. Less than 1/36 4 cases (among them
+ one with H. 2 D.
+ in the squinting eye.)
+ V. indeterminable 1 case.
+
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 2 cases with very slight anisometropia
+ and good vision.
+ 2. M. 2 D. to M. 3 D. 11 cases, all permanent (6 cases
+ previously operated on), anisometropia with
+ good vision in both eyes in 2 cases (in both, the
+ less myopic eye squints). V. of the squinting
+ eye more than 1/7 in 6 cases.
+ V. 1/12 - 1/18 1 case.
+ V. 1/24 - 1/36 2 cases.
+ V. less than 1/36 2 cases (one with H = 5 D).
+ 3. M. 3.5 D. to 6 D.
+ (_a_) Permanent 11 cases (one previously operated
+ on). Anisometropia in 2 cases, of which one consisted
+ of alternating squint, while the other possessed
+ in the fixing eye M. 4 D., in the squinting one M. 7.5
+ D. with good vision on both sides.
+ V. more than 1/7 7 cases.
+ V. 1/24 1 case.
+ V. 1/36 1 case (in fixation with this
+ eye; the visual axis shows a linear deviation of 2 mm.
+ The presence of emmetropia is detected with the ophthalmoscope).
+ Two cases were excluded from the statistics of vision, one on
+ account of congenital capsular cataract, covering almost the
+ whole pupil area, the other on account of choroiditis of the
+ macula lutea.
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 4 cases with good vision,
+ anisometropia in 2 cases.
+ 4. M. 6.5 D. and more.
+ (_a_) Permanent 11 cases, among them 9 with V.
+ more than 1/7, 2 excluded from the statistics, one on
+ account of complication with corneal nebulae, cataract,
+ &c., the other possessed in the fixing eye M. 6.5 D.
+ V. = 10/70 and slight nystagmus, in the squinting eye
+ a smaller amount of sight not accurately noted, and
+ strong nystagmus in fixing with this eye.
+ (_b_) Periodic squint in 4 cases with good vision.
+ 5. Myopia with nystagmus and congenital amblyopia
+ on both sides, 2 cases (not included in the
+ statistics of vision). Altogether 56 cases, among
+ them 10 with periodic squint.
+
+B. Convergent squint in emmetropia, including simple
+ myopic astigmatism, 98 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 81 cases (13 previously operated
+ on). Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in 44 cases. V.
+ less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 6 cases; V. less than 1/12 to
+ V. = 1/36 20 cases; V. less than 1/36 7. Excluded from
+ statistics of vision 4 (3 on account of complications,
+ 1 on account of lack of accurate information).
+ (_b_) Alternating convergent squint with emmetropia
+ in one, myopia in the other eye, 4 cases. The degree
+ of the myopia was 3.75 D., 5 D., 6 D., 12 D.
+ Vision good on both sides.
+ (_c_) Periodic squint 13 cases (in 6 of them the
+ refraction was objectively and subjectively determined
+ in mydriasis by atropine). No anisometropia worth
+ mentioning was present in any of these cases. Visual
+ acuteness more than 1/7 9 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 2. V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; one case with choroiditis
+ excluded.
+
+C. Convergent squint with doubtful hypermetropia to
+ H. = 1 D., including simple hypermetropic astigmatism,
+ 38 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 30 cases (5 previously operated on).
+ Visual acuteness more than 1/7 7 cases. V < 1/7 to
+ V. = 1/12 2. V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 5. V. < 1/36 2 cases.
+ 4 excluded (3 complicated with cataract, one on
+ account of impossibility of a trial of vision).
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 7.
+ V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case.
+
+D. Hypermetropia 1 D. to 1.5 D. 37 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 23 (4 cases previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 13, V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3. V. < 1/12
+ to V. = 1/36 3. V. < 1/36 3. One case excluded
+ (choroiditis of the macula lutea).
+ (_b_) Periodic squint 14 cases. V. more than 1/7 12.
+ V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1 case. One excluded on account
+ of choroiditis.
+
+E. Hypermetropia 1.5 D. to 2 D. 61 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 41 (3 previously operated on). V.
+ more than 1/7 26 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3;
+ V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. < 1/36 2; (7 cases excluded,
+ 2 as complicated, 5 on account of the impossibility of
+ testing the vision).
+ (_b_) Periodic 20 cases. V. more than 1/7 16; V.
+ < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. < 1/12 to 1/36 1; V. < 1/36 1
+ case.
+
+F. Hypermetropia 2 D. to 3 D. 88 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 58 cases. V. more than 1/7 26 cases;
+ V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 5 cases (among them one with V.
+ = 1/12 in both eyes); V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 17; V.
+ < 1/36 4 cases. Six cases excluded as indeterminable.
+ (_b_) Periodic 30 cases. V. to 1/7 24; V < 1/7 to V.
+ = 1/12 3; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 1; V < 1/36 1. One case
+ excluded as indeterminable.
+
+G. Hypermetropia 3 D. to 4.5 D. 54 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 35 cases (9 previously operated on).
+ V. more than 1/7 18 cases; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case;
+ V. < 1/12 to 1/36 9; 7 cases excluded.
+ (_b_) Periodic 19 cases. V. more than 1/7 14; V.
+ < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. < 1/36
+ 1 case.
+
+H. H. 5 D. and more, 16 cases.
+ (_a_) Permanent 9; V. to 1/7 3; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12
+ 3; V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36 2; V. < 1/36 1 case.
+ (_b_) Periodic 7; V. to 1/7 4; V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 3
+ cases.
+
+
+_Table of Refraction and Acuity of Vision in Convergent Strabismus._
+
+[Transcriber's note: Key created to make table fit page]
+
+KEY:
+A: Permanent
+B: V. to 1/7.
+C: V. < 1/7 to V 1/12.
+D: V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+E: V. < 1/36.
+F: Excluded.
+G: Periodic.
+H: V. to 1/7.
+I: V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12.
+J: V. < 1/12. to V. 1/36.
+K: V. < 1/36.
+L: Excluded.
+
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+ Convergent | | | | | | | | | | | |
+ strabismus. | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |K | L
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+Myopia | 44| 26 | 2| 4 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 10 | -- | -- | -- | --
+Emmetropia | 85| 48 | 6| 20 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 1 | -- | 1
+H ? to H. 1 D. | 30| 17 | 2| 5 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+H. 1 D. to H. 1.5 D.| 23| 13 | 3| 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 12 | -- | 1 | -- | 1
+H. 1.5 D. to H. 2 D.| 41| 26 | 3| 3 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | --
+H. 2 D. to H. 3 D. | 58| 26 | 5| 17 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1
+H. 3 D. to H. 4.5 D.| 35| 18 | 1| 9 | -- | 7 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 | --
+H. 5 D. and more | 9| 3 | 3| 2 | 1 | -- | 7 | 4 | 3 | -- | -- | --
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+ |325|177 | 25| 63 | 26 | 34 |121 | 96 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 3
+--------------------+---+----+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
+
+According to this the percentage of the hypermetropia (including
+doubtful cases) amounts to 66 per cent. Dr. Isler in his dissertation,
+'The Dependence of Strabismus on Refraction,' gives the percentage of
+hypermetropia in convergent squint as 88 per cent.--a great difference,
+which can, however, be partly accounted for. Isler found in
+hypermetropia of 2 to 10 dioptres squinting in 75 per cent.; in my
+statistics H. 1.5 D. to the highest degrees of hypermetropia are
+likewise represented by 75 per cent. As the difference between H. 2 D.
+and H. 1.5 D. amounts to only half a dioptre, the results of the
+statistics agree perfectly within these limits; the difference lies only
+in the slighter degrees of hypermetropia, for the diagnosis of which
+refer to pp. 12 to 14.
+
+The influence of hypermetropia is very apparent in the percentage of
+periodic squint. While in myopia, emmetropia, and slight hypermetropia,
+the sum total of permanent as compared to periodic squint is as 100:
+19.5, this number mounts in hypermetropia of 1 D. to H. = 3 D. to 52.5
+and in the higher degrees to 59 per cent. Despite the small number of
+cases it is probably no mere accident that in the highest degrees (of H.
+= 5 D. and more) this percentage is calculated at 77.7.
+
+But just this undoubted favouring of periodic squint by hypermetropia,
+helps to show that this condition is one of the causes of squint, but
+not the only one, for in periodic squint just those conditions are
+wanting which induce a permanent deviation.
+
+It is further proved by the table that in convergent strabismus, myopia
+appears just about as frequently as the higher degrees of hypermetropia
+(of 3 dioptres and more). The fact that these are not so strongly
+represented in convergent strabismus, as one would have expected
+according to his theory, had also struck Donders. "This cannot be
+wondered at," he continues, "the power of accommodation, even with
+increased convergence, does not here suffice to produce clear images.
+One gains much better ideas by practice from imperfect retinal images
+than by correcting, as far as possible, the retinal images by a maximum
+of accommodation." I can concede neither to the facts on which the
+theory is based nor to the theoretical structure itself.
+
+An additional statistic which I drew up of the cases of hypermetropia
+which occurred during one year in my private practice, showed that the
+higher degrees are rare in the same proportion as cases of convergent
+strabismus are, with the corresponding degrees of hypermetropia.
+Further, however, I maintain that as a rule, at the age when squint
+usually begins, the accommodation really suffices to overcome even high
+degrees of hypermetropia. In all cases where we find full acuity of
+vision without correction of extreme hypermetropia--and this is
+frequently the case in young persons who do not squint--we may assume
+that the accommodation perfectly suffices to produce clear retinal
+images, without excessive convergence. In full acuity of vision even
+high degrees of hypermetropia are no trouble to children. Asthenopia,
+which occurs in children in connection with hypermetropia, is nearly
+always accompanied by defective vision. Were the increased demand on the
+accommodation really the cause of convergent strabismus, asthenopia
+would be far more common than it is among hypermetropic children who do
+not squint.
+
+One can assert, with far greater right, that a sufficient ground for
+squint is not given by slight degrees of hypermetropia, for the latter
+are accommodatively overcome and binocular fixation retained by youthful
+persons without any difficulty, even when the additional motives
+enumerated by Donders are present. I have endeavoured to obtain a
+foundation for the depreciating influence of these circumstances
+favorable to squint, for I counted in my private practice, at the same
+time with the cases of squint, those cases also in which, despite those
+conditions which lessen the value of binocular vision, squinting was not
+present. Taking notice then of those cases in which the hypermetropia of
+the better or less hypermetropic eye amounted to at least 1.5 D., in
+order to allow the influence of the hypermetropia to be more
+conspicuous. The patients from which the above-cited 219 cases of
+convergent strabismus with a hypermetropia of at least 1.5 D. are drawn,
+comprised also 117 cases in which, with the same degree of hypermetropia
+and simultaneous difference of refraction or monocular amblyopia, no
+convergent squint was present; of these cases 101 had acuity of vision
+to 1/7; less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 7, and V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36 9
+cases. The percentage 219: 117 = 100: 53, which is yielded for the
+middle and higher degrees of hypermetropia, is not exactly convincing
+for the accommodative theory of squint; it would be placed still less
+favorably if we were to include the lowest degrees of hypermetropia in
+the statistics.
+
+In face of these facts I do not consider it a happy question, that of
+seeking after "reasons for the prevention of squint." We do not want to
+quarrel with Donders over the question why all hypermetropes do not
+squint. Here, of course, I quite agree with Ulrich that squint does not
+occur if the necessary muscular conditions are absent. The identity of
+the fields of vision, on the other hand, seems to me to be of no
+importance for the age at which squint usually commences. This identity
+presupposes the habit of binocular fusion; but convergent squint arises,
+as a rule, before this habit is acquired. But even if binocular fusion
+were already learnt, it is given up with astonishing rapidity by
+children as soon as squint develops itself (see Case 16). The fixed
+habit of binocular fusion and the identity of the fields of vision
+dependent on it, is contracted only when squint does not occur,
+notwithstanding the presence of conditions favorable to it.
+
+However, the number of cases is so considerable in which, despite the
+presence of the causative motives suggested by Donders, no convergent
+strabismus is present, that the co-operation of other causes is
+necessary for the production of squint, and the first thing we do is to
+think of those causes which lead to squint even without hypermetropia.
+
+The attempt has really been made to attribute the commencement of
+convergent strabismus to the accommodation even in emmetropia, and
+offers fresh proof how easily facts are overwhelmed by theories. Donders
+originally gave it as his opinion, that loss of power or paresis of the
+accommodation produces strabismus just as little as the decrease in the
+amount of accommodation which comes with increase of years; a year
+later, because he could not agree with Donders' theory, Javal declared
+the principal cause to be due to weakening of the accommodation and not
+the refraction, but without producing any other ground for the assertion
+than that of his own good pleasure. Afterwards, Donders sought to
+explain the occurrence of convergent strabismus in emmetropia by paresis
+of accommodation, which must indeed, according to his theory, produce
+the same result as hypermetropia.
+
+I content myself by reminding my readers, that at the age when
+convergent strabismus usually arises, between the second and third year
+of life, a determination of the near point is utterly impossible; a
+foundation in fact is therefore wanting to the theory. But, further, if
+paresis of accommodation really had the significance assigned to it,
+atropine, which is so frequently used in the ophthalmic treatment of
+children, would be followed by convergent strabismus. This is still more
+the case with diphtheritic paralysis of accommodation, which is present
+more frequently than we are aware of, for it is only a trouble to
+children in the schoolroom, in younger children it passes through its
+natural uninterrupted course of recovery unobserved, in hypermetropia as
+well as in emmetropia. If the accommodation were really of great
+importance in the occurrence of squint, convergent strabismus would
+frequently be an after symptom of diphtheria, which, as is known, is not
+the case. The few cases of squint which I have seen after diphtheria,
+had their origin in paresis of the external rectus, which was proved by
+the objective defect in movement, as well as by the disappearance of the
+squint, with the recovery of the paralysis of the abducens.
+
+That the accommodation can play a part, is shown by the rarity of
+periodic accommodative squint, but for the great majority we must seek
+the chief cause of squint in emmetropia and myopia, in elastic
+preponderance of the internal recti and insufficiency of the externi,
+and it is apparent that the same causes will also be influential in
+hypermetropia.
+
+In hypermetropia, if one causes fixation at about 30 cm. and then covers
+the eye with the hand, it frequently deviates inwards. Donders infers
+from this, that most hypermetropes prefer to sacrifice comfortable and
+clear vision in order to retain binocular vision. Now, it is easy to
+convince oneself that youthful hypermetropes see distinctly even without
+correction of their hypermetropia, and we may assume that they see
+comfortably if they do not complain of asthenopia; but that is by no
+means always the case, for the appearance of asthenopia is conditional
+on the relation of the degree of the hypermetropia to the amount of the
+accommodation, which, apart from a few other causes, depends chiefly on
+the age of the patient.
+
+Just as we refer the deviation outwards of the covered eye to
+insufficiency of the interni or preponderance of the externi, we may
+conclude an inward deviation of the covered eye to be due to
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni, and this
+all the more, as in hypermetropia the covered eye very frequently
+remains in fixation, and falls away exceptionally into relative
+divergence.
+
+Just as in myopia even in the lesser degrees, insufficiency of the
+interni or preponderance of the externi is not rare, so in hypermetropia
+insufficiency of the externi or preponderance of the interni appears to
+be frequent; and if this disturbance of the muscular balance be followed
+even in myopia or emmetropia by convergent strabismus, this will of
+course happen still more easily if at the same time hypermetropia, or
+even without hypermetropia, the remaining favouring conditions mentioned
+by Donders are present. Of course I do not deny the effect of the
+hypermetropia and of those other favouring conditions, but only wish to
+draw attention to the fact with reference to them, that as a rule they
+do not of themselves suffice to produce convergent strabismus.
+
+Nebulae have always been regarded as one of the causes of squint; here I
+quite agree with Donders that they may operate, firstly, as general
+causes of weak sight; secondly, through this, that the irritated
+condition, combined with the keratitis, may produce a spasmodic,
+afterwards a trophic shortening of the muscles; but this seldom happens.
+
+Whether nebulae are found rarely or often in squint, depends in great
+measure on the statistic materials which are worked out. In my
+statistics they do not occur in any quantity worth mentioning, because
+in private practice purulent ophthalmia keratitis, and in short, the
+whole army of external inflammations of the eye is much rarer, than in
+that portion of the populace which fills public clinics. Further, it is
+to be observed that the mere occurrence of nebulae in squint proves
+nothing--even squinting eyes may develop keratitis. We must at least
+require to be assured that the squint began after the keratitis.
+
+Among the causes which promote the occurrence of squint, Donders
+mentions also conditions which diminish convergence. We have ascribed a
+very important _role_ to the muscles, and have only to occupy ourselves
+here with the relation between the visual line and the axis of the
+cornea, which we have already mentioned on page 2. Donders has measured
+the angle _a_ in ten cases of hypermetropia with convergent strabismus,
+and from the comparison with hypermetropic non-squinting eyes draws the
+conclusion, that in similar degrees of hypermetropia a higher amount of
+_a_ specially disposes to strabismus. I will not repeat here the witty
+deduction by which Donders seeks to point out that a higher value of a
+must be followed by insufficiency of the externi and preponderance of
+the interni; the concession is enough that these circumstances exist and
+are the cause of the squint.
+
+
+
+
+PERIODIC CONVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+
+The opinion is prevalent that convergent strabismus usually begins in
+the form of periodic squint, and that a permanent deviation is developed
+in this way only. In many cases it may be so; on the other hand I have
+sometimes seen convergent strabismus arise suddenly, without a
+preliminary stage of periodic squint. This question, however, is of no
+special interest. It is more important to note that periodic squint
+frequently continues to exist unchanged, without ever becoming
+permanent.
+
+Like the whole doctrine of strabismus, opinions on periodic squint have
+been governed by Donders' theory, regardless of facts, but as the
+accommodation frequently exercises a perceptible influence, it is
+judicious to consider first of all the cases in which this does not
+happen.
+
+Convergent squint in myopia begins as a rule with periodic squint, and
+may continue to exist in this form: some patients who would not be
+operated upon have been under my observation for years; sometimes a
+correct position was retained for a long time, and sometimes strong
+convergent squint was present, proving that accommodation had nothing
+whatever to do with it. In myopia of higher degree the accommodation is
+scarcely used--unless concave glasses are worn; still periodic squint
+occurs under these circumstances. For example:
+
+CASE 1. Miss B--, aet. 22, possesses in both eyes myopia of 6.5 D. with
+full visual acuteness and without posterior staphyloma. A concave
+eyeglass of 4.5 D. is used off and on for distance, and the eyes have
+never been over-exerted in looking at near objects. For a long time
+tendency to convergent squint, which is combined with diplopia, has
+existed on the left side. The eyes generally have a perfectly normal
+position, but occasionally convergent squint occurs, remains in
+existence a few hours, perhaps for a whole day even, and disappears
+again. The deviation here amounts to 4 or 5 mm. As the patient did not
+wish for an operation, I have been able to observe the condition for
+years without any change in it or without the squint becoming permanent.
+The cause of periodic squint is certainly not to be sought for here, in
+the accommodation.
+
+Many cases of convergent strabismus with myopia constantly offer such a
+peculiar phase of the defect, that one has accepted the statements which
+ascribe to short-sightedness a determining influence on this form of
+squint, without asking for further proof. It may, therefore, be useful
+for our purpose to cite a few cases of periodic convergent strabismus
+with emmetropia. For instance:
+
+CASE 2. Louise S--, aet. 6-1/2, came under treatment for follicular
+conjunctivitis, convergent strabismus appearing simultaneously on the
+right side; the investigation showed the acuity of vision of left eye =
+5/12, right V. = 5/36, the ophthalmoscope, and also mydriasis by
+atropine, proved the presence of emmetropia. The squint had first been
+observed when the child was about two years old, then it disappeared
+spontaneously and returned again three or four months ago.
+
+In the course of treatment, which extended over about six months, the
+child came repeatedly into my consulting room, sometimes with squint,
+sometimes without, in the periods during which correct fixation existed,
+no squint occurred even when working. Examination with the stereoscope
+showed no normal binocular fusion even during normal position of the
+eyes.
+
+CASE 3. Vera von K--, aet. 6; tendency to convergent strabismus, mostly
+on right side, has existed one and a half years. Normal position as a
+rule, on covering the eye immediate convergence, with a deviation of 5
+mm.; with additional aid of a red glass and weak prisms deviating in a
+vertical direction, homonymous diplopia is very easily provoked. Visual
+acuteness on both sides 5/12, the left slightly better than the right;
+emmetropia in mydriasis by atropine. A year later a repeated examination
+gave the same result.
+
+The cause of periodic squint in these cases can only be sought in the
+bearing of the ocular muscles; an elastic preponderance of the interni
+existed, which ceased, as a rule, on using the externi. A special
+influence of the accommodation was not traceable, which does not of
+course prevent this from acting differently in other cases. But in
+periodic squint it may frequently be observed that the deviation
+commences under influences which have nothing to do with the
+accommodation, but, on the contrary, under those which weaken the
+muscular energy generally, for example, fatigue, anxiety, &c.
+
+Like convergent squint generally, the periodic form is also more
+frequent in hypermetropia than in emmetropia or myopia, and we admit
+that in hypermetropia the strain on the accommodation has more influence
+in producing the deviation. But as the appearance of periodic squint in
+emmetropia or myopia is proved without participation of the
+accommodation, solely on the ground of the muscular forces--so the
+presence of the same forces in hypermetropia ought not to be ignored.
+
+It happens, indeed, that in considerable degrees of hypermetropia a
+slight convergent deviation occurs only from time to time, the cause of
+which, on closer investigation, can only be sought in the ocular
+muscles. For example:
+
+CASE 4. Paul F--, was first introduced to me in 1872 as a child of three
+years and two months, with a tendency to convergent strabismus on the
+right side of two months' standing, which was sometimes greater,
+sometimes less, and sometimes was not present at all. In 1877 I saw him
+again suffering from conjunctivitis, without perceiving any squint; no
+examination respecting it was made. In 1880 his elder brother came under
+treatment for apparent myopia, which with the ophthalmoscope proved to
+be hypermetropia, and my attention, being again drawn to the eyes of the
+family, I requested the younger brother to come for examination. At
+first sight the position of the eyes appeared to be quite normal, on
+more careful inspection slight convergent squint of the right eye showed
+itself occasionally. On both sides apparent emmetropia or very slight
+hypermetropia, acuity of vision on left side 5/9, on the right 5/18,
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of refraction was impossible on account of
+restless fixation.
+
+With the addition of a red glass diplopia cannot be produced, the left
+field of vision is observed in the stereoscope, then the right one on
+covering the left eye; never both together. In mydriasis by atropine
+hypermetropia of high degree (about 4 dioptres) is ophthalmoscopically
+detected on both sides, with convex 4.5 D., V. = 5/9 with slight
+convergent deviation of the right eye.
+
+What has here prevented the transition to permanent squint with a
+deviation corresponding to the great strain on the accommodation? That
+the accommodation was really in action is proved simply by the apparent
+emmetropia and the school-work, that no retention of binocular single
+vision took place is shown by the proved incapacity for binocular fusion
+of the retinal images. Nothing then remains but to accept the fact that
+in the ocular muscles inducement was only given for a slight periodic
+squint, not for a permanent one answering to the amount of accommodation
+used.
+
+As further proof that periodic squint may occur even in hypermetropia
+quite independently of the accommodation, I should like to cite a case
+of intermittent convergent strabismus which a number of other oculists
+have seen besides myself.
+
+CASE 5. Sophie S--, aet. 7-3/4, has suffered for two years from a strong
+convergent squint on the left side, occurring every other day. The
+deviation amounts to 7 mm. (the same deviation is transferred to the
+left eye, when the right is put into fixation). On the intervening days
+the position of the eyes is quite normal, on covering one only a slight
+deviation takes place. The visual acuteness amounts to 5/12 on the left,
+5/24 on the right, ophthalmoscopically with atropine hypermetropia of
+two dioptres. Quinine has been given without avail, a convex glass of 2
+D. also, which has been worn for the last half year, has not affected
+the deviation.
+
+Diplopia was not present--on the intervening days free from squint, with
+the aid of a red glass, homonymous diplopia could be detected without
+perceptible deviation, still it was impossible to bring about a union of
+the double images by prisms. In the stereoscope the left field of vision
+was first inspected, then both, still fusion of the fields of vision was
+not traceable. The statements, moreover, as indeed could not be expected
+otherwise in a child of such tender age, were not free from
+contradictions, but the existence of normal binocular vision was very
+doubtful. I therefore performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus,
+after which normal position continued to exist on the following squint
+days. After three quarters of a year I saw the child again; the squint
+was perfectly cured, even on looking down, convergence was no longer
+present. Whether a permanent cure was thus obtained, seems to me
+doubtful, owing to the rare peculiarities of this case.
+
+Mannhardt also describes a similar case of intermittent squint; that of
+a girl aged eight years, in whom periodic convergent strabismus had
+begun four years previously, and for two years had occurred regularly
+every other day. On undecided vision the eyes were normally placed, but
+as soon as a near or distant object was fixed, a considerable deviation
+inwards of the left eye occurred. Under the covering hand both eyes
+deviated inwards equally. On the non-squinting days strabismus could in
+no way be produced even by fixation of the nearest objects, only under
+the covering hand a deviation inwards ensued. The squint could not be
+removed by quinine, but only by correction of the hypermetropia of 3 D.
+In any case, then, hypermetropia was one of the causes of the squint,
+but not the only one, as it cannot operate on alternate days only.
+
+Javal, who tries to make this case coincide with his theory, accepting
+an intermitting paresis of accommodation as the cause of squint, is
+manifestly in error, as Mannhardt particularly mentions that acuity of
+vision, refraction and accommodation remained perfectly equal on both
+days.
+
+If it is thus proved, that also in periodic inward squint the deviation
+may occur quite independently of the accommodation, on the other hand it
+is apparent, that if once a tendency to squint exists, a
+disproportionately strong convergence may very easily unite itself with
+the accommodation. Particularly of course in hypermetropes, who are able
+to fix nothing without using their accommodation, a remarkable
+fluctuation of the squint angle very frequently takes place. Sometimes
+the deviation is exceedingly strong, sometimes so slight that it seems
+to be absent. It is usually impossible to determine if it is really
+absent, for as soon as we single out a point for fixation to make the
+investigation feasible, strong deviation sets in. If in such cases we
+perfectly atropise both eyes, restore the attainable acuity of vision by
+neutralisation of the hypermetropia with convex glasses, and yet,
+nevertheless, as is generally the case, the customary strong convergence
+takes place on fixation of a distant object, there can be no talk of a
+strain on the accommodation; at most we can say, that the impulse for
+accommodation, habitually united with the intention to see distinctly,
+and the too strong convergence combined with it, also takes place,
+though by paralysis of the accommodation the participation of the same
+has become impossible. As accommodative squint those cases are chiefly
+indicated in which the deviation only takes place when there is a claim
+on the accommodation. In most cases of this kind hypermetropia is
+present. I have occasionally seen periodic accommodative squint with
+emmetropia of the fixing eye.
+
+CASE 6 may serve as an example: H. B--, aet. 15, shows a considerable and
+very varying periodic inward squint. Sometimes correct position is
+present, sometimes strong deviation, indeed the latter only occurs on
+looking at distant objects, while for near ones correct position of the
+eyes generally takes place. The examination showed for the right eye
+hypermetropia 1.5, for the left myopia 3.5 D.; full acuity of vision on
+both sides. The squint occurring in the left eye on looking at distant
+objects was therefore accommodative; the effort of the accommodation
+necessary for correcting the hypermetropia united itself to an
+excessively strong innervation of the interni, as the interests of
+binocular vision came but slightly into consideration on account of the
+myopia in the left eye. For near objects the myopic eye is used without
+accommodation and therefore also without convergent strabismus of the
+right. But if one caused a point about 25 cm. distant to be fixed first
+with the right (hypermetropic) eye while the left was covered and then
+caused fixation to be transferred to the left, the accommodative
+convergent strabismus induced was alternately transferred to the left
+eye and continued, although the left eye fixed without any effort of the
+accommodation on account of its myopia. Double tenotomy of the interni
+and correction of the hypermetropia effected the cure of the squint.
+
+The clearest cases of accommodative strabismus are those in which
+usually a correct position and sometimes even binocular fusion is
+present, while squint occurs only during the strain on the accommodation
+necessary for distinct vision.
+
+CASE 7. Miss Bertha v. Pr--, aet. 27, shows strong accommodative squint
+of the right eye, said to have been observed by her parents when she was
+fifteen months old. Correct position of the eyes is generally present
+with indistinct vision; the endeavours to see clearly immediately causes
+striking convergence of the right eye. On the left hypermetropia 3.5 D.,
+vision normal; on the right the same degree of hypermetropia, vision not
+more than 1/12 of the normal, no ophthalmoscopic report. On correction
+of the hypermetropia and with aid of a red glass crossed diplopia
+immediately appears, which is corrected by a prism of 5 deg. base inwards;
+prisms of 12 deg. with the bases inwards are overcome on fixation of an
+object about 12 ft. distant by divergence. The elastic tension of the
+ocular muscles necessitates then a preponderance of the externi, and an
+effort of the accommodation necessary to overcome the hypermetropia,
+which on account of the congenital amblyopia of the right eye unites
+itself with excessive convergence. Had the elastic tension of the ocular
+muscles made a preponderance of the interni a condition, permanent
+convergent squint would have been the result, and one would have called
+the weak sight of the right eye amblyopia from want of use.
+
+Typical accommodative squint occurs quite independently of the will on
+each effort of the accommodation, and is not combined with diplopia. It
+is otherwise in those cases of hypermetropia of high degree in which
+patients voluntarily call forth convergent squint, and retain it for a
+short time for the purpose of distinct vision. They are then perfectly
+conscious of the squint, and perceive also as a rule the double images
+which occur at the same time; I have seen such cases in adults who could
+only produce the accommodation necessary for distinct vision by the aid
+of a too strong convergence; they, however, only now and then made use
+of this help. Although differing much from the typical form, these cases
+of voluntary accommodative squint were also included in the statistics.
+
+In involuntary periodic (even if not accommodative) squint, the patient
+as a rule is not conscious of the occurrence of the false position; that
+exceptions to this occur Case 1 has given us an instance.
+
+
+
+
+CONVERGENT SQUINT IN MYOPIA.
+
+
+For the aetiology of convergent strabismus it is of interest to ascertain
+the age at which it is developed, and one of the first results we obtain
+is the exceptional position which the union of myopia with convergent
+strabismus takes in this category. Of the 56 cases contained in the
+above statistics I possess reliable information of the time of
+commencement in 11 cases; the squint was twice observed before the
+fourth year of life, once between four and ten years of age, eight times
+between the tenth and thirty-third years of life.
+
+I must first state prominently with regard to the connection of myopia
+with convergent squint that I see no reason for holding short sight to
+be the cause of the squint, as v. Graefe does.
+
+A specially severe strain of the eyes, as v. Graefe assumes, was not
+traceable in the cases observed by me. Excessive convergence and strain
+on the accommodation is often enough present in weak sight, for example,
+in astigmatism without the existence of squint; were short sight in
+general an inducement to convergent squint these cases would appear much
+oftener than they actually do, owing to the frequency of myopia. In my
+opinion the cause of their rarity lies in the fact that myopia is
+frequently combined with insufficiency of the interni and preponderance
+of the externi, but only rarely with the reverse condition of the
+muscles. If, however, a preponderance of the interni develops itself
+together with the myopia, convergent strabismus is easily produced, for
+without correction of the myopia by spectacles, the desire for retaining
+binocular single vision for everything beyond the far point is lessened
+by the indistinctness of the retinal images. Within the range of their
+field of distinct vision these squinting myopes frequently retain
+binocular vision, while the capacity for accepting parallel rays or
+retaining them for long, is lost.
+
+Strictly speaking, the periodic squint present in these cases is of a
+peculiar kind, for the binocular single vision present within range of
+the convergence excludes the notion of squint; the latter only occurs
+when an object lying outside the point of convergence is fixed.
+Moreover, according to the common use of language, I have only used the
+expression periodic convergent squint for the change between a parallel
+direction of the visual axes and pathological convergence.
+
+As squint in myopia usually commences at an age when binocular fusion
+has already become a fixed habit, diplopia regularly takes place with
+it, but patients become more easily accustomed to this than in paralysis
+of the ocular muscles, because the retinal images are indistinct and the
+double images in the field of vision always keep at about the same
+distance, while in paralysis of the ocular muscles the distance is
+constantly changing.
+
+The myopia, in these cases, is not the cause of the squint, but only a
+favouring circumstance. If the same preponderance of the interni is
+developed at the same age in emmetropia, squint is not so easily caused,
+as the distinct retinal images present in the whole field of vision
+render it easy to retain binocular single vision. Therefore we see the
+same form of squint arise less often in emmetropia (see Case 45) when
+childhood is past, than in myopia. As a rule preponderance of the
+interni in hypermetropia leads eventually to convergent squint even in
+childhood.
+
+In emmetropia and hypermetropia convergent strabismus seldom arises
+after the tenth year (paresis of the abducens of course excepted),
+therefore in my investigations as to the time of commencement of typical
+squint I have only considered those patients who came under my treatment
+before their tenth year. We must rely for the most part on the vague
+statements of the parents, which lose in exactness in proportion as the
+origin of the squint is of distant date; moreover, I have myself seen a
+great many of the children before they were four years old. In this way
+I have collected reliable information respecting the origin of the
+squint in 193 cases, and of these (_a_) 88 cases occurred in children
+one to three years old, (_b_) 53 in children three to four years old,
+(_c_) 35 cases in children of over four years of age. It is thus at once
+seen that in the great majority of cases, convergent strabismus
+commences in children under four years of age, who have not yet begun to
+read and write, and have no inducement to use their accommodation
+severely, and still less continuously.
+
+
+
+
+SQUINT FROM PARALYSIS OF THE ABDUCENS.
+
+
+Convergent squint as a result of paralysis of the abducens is not very
+often seen. It is first to be observed that a convergent squint,
+including the whole field of vision, occurs by no means in all cases; in
+about half the cases binocular fusion is retained towards the healthy
+side, diplopia then only occurs when the weak abducens is exerted beyond
+its strength. In those cases in which convergent squint is present in
+the whole field of vision paralysis of the abducens cannot be the sole
+cause, but some other cause than the most apparent one must co-operate.
+An insufficiency of the externi of previous existence, or an elastic
+preponderence of the interni may be considered. I have not been able to
+persuade myself of the fact that hypermetropia can play any part
+therein.
+
+In by far the greater number of cases paralytic convergent squint
+recovers together with the paralysis of the abducens, the field of
+single vision transfers itself gradually from the healthy side to the
+side of the weak abducens, and at length governs the whole field of
+vision. In proportion as the muscle again fulfils its normal functions,
+the habit of binocular fixation regains its power, and it seldom happens
+that the elastic tension of the muscles has so changed during paralysis
+that the desire for binocular single vision does not suffice to overcome
+it. Case 48 furnishes an example of the fact that although the squint
+occurred as a consequence of paralysis of the abducens, it certainly
+remained in existence after healing of the paralysis on account of
+previously existing insufficiency of the externi.
+
+Congenital paralysis of the abducens seems more frequently to have
+convergent squint as a result. If, for example, convergent squint is
+observed in the first year of life, and we find a complete defect of
+motion on the part of one abducens when the children become old enough
+to be examined, we may certainly assume that the case is one of
+congenital paralysis of this muscle, or at least that the paralysis
+originated soon after birth. Doubtless, however, cases appear, of
+congenital paralysis of the abducens without squint, and as these cases
+are so rare I will describe two which I observed in adults.
+
+CASE 8. Miss H--, aet. 17, has nominally since her birth a considerable
+defect in the outward movement of the left eye. On looking to the left
+homonymous diplopia is present, on looking to the front and the right
+binocular single vision and no squint; on both sides emmetropia and full
+acuity of vision.
+
+CASE 9. Mr. V. W--, aet. 24, has likewise congenital paralysis of the
+left abducens. No squint, but as soon as the left eye is used for
+fixation in the left direction there occurs in the right one a strong
+secondary movement inwards.
+
+
+
+
+HYSTERICAL SQUINT.
+
+
+In the hysterical form we see rather a rare variety of convergent
+squint, which is conditional on contraction of the interni through
+restriction of movement of the externi. Hysterical symptoms may at the
+same time appear in the eyes or elsewhere, still this does not always
+happen. As these cases are rare I will relate a few of those I have
+observed. (These cases are not included in the above statistics.)
+
+CASE 10. Anna R--, aet. 20, came under treatment in February, 1878,
+stating that on the previous day she perceived blindness of the right
+eye on waking; in the afternoon she felt particularly weary, and after
+she had slept about an hour woke with blindness in both eyes. No
+perception of light, good pupillary reaction, ophthalmoscopic report
+normal. Patient was treated with copious enemata and dismissed on the
+fifth day cured.
+
+In February, 1880, she again came under treatment with blindness of both
+eyes, also perceived the previous day on waking. Convergent strabismus
+was present at the same time, of such a degree that the eyes converged
+to a point 10 to 20 cm. distant. The outward movement was suspended in
+both eyes. The attempt to turn the eye outwards is accompanied by short
+convulsive movements, and followed by an immediate rebound to the
+convergent position. She asserts her inability to see the movements of a
+hand before her eyes, is able, however, to move about in a strange room,
+unsteadily certainly, but with avoidance of obstacles; she sits down on
+a chair indicated to her, &c. The position of the eyes proves that there
+was no simulation in all this; it would be impossible for any person to
+simulate a strong convergent squint continuously for four to five days.
+Eight days after her admission the patient was dismissed with normal
+movement of the eyes and good vision.
+
+CASE 11. Miss Antonie E--, aet. 15, who has been treated by her family
+physician for various hysterical disturbances, suffered since the middle
+of December, 1879, from convergent strabismus with permanent but very
+varying deviation, which is at times very slight, and sometimes amounted
+to more than 7 mm. The movement outwards is in both eyes rendered
+difficult, still the outer edge of the cornea is brought to the outer
+angle of the lids with trouble and twitching movements. Homonymous
+double images are present, their mutual distance is alike in the whole
+field of vision, but is (six or eight weeks after the commencement of
+the squint) signified as being slight; at the same time a difference in
+height is present, the image of the left eye stands lower, prism 30 deg.,
+base outwards, places the images just above one another. Nystagmus
+occasionally occurs in monocular fixation (with exclusion of the other
+eye). In due course a gradual improvement set in, the deviation and the
+distance apart of the double images became slighter, the outward
+movement better, and in the middle of April, 1880, four months after the
+trouble began, no squint and no diplopia were present, the outward
+movement normal, facultative divergence = 0.
+
+The hysterical character of the visual disturbance showed itself when
+the vision was tested. I will first observe that repeated investigations
+with atropine showed emmetropia, while in the first investigation on the
+left side, No. 36 at 5 m. was not recognised with the naked eye, but
+only with weak concave glasses (with - .5 D. V. = 5/18). With the right
+eye No. 0.8 was read fluently, from 0.75 she asserted she was unable to
+recognise a word, with - 2 D. V. = 5/36. It would be wrong to conclude
+from this myopia or spasm of the accommodation, for here, as in most
+cases of hysterical weak sight, it could be shown that whatever glass
+one chose to hold before the patient's eyes, was followed by an
+improvement in the statements. The same improvement in visual acuteness
+was repeatedly obtained in this case by a weak prism (3 deg.), held before
+the fixing eye during monocular examination, and in the end, V. 5/12 was
+obtained for the right eye, as against 5/6 with a prism of 3 deg.
+
+Finally, on May 1st, full visual acuteness was present on both sides.
+Field of vision and sense of colour normal.
+
+CASE 12. Mrs. B--, aet. 30, previously treated for various hysterical
+disturbances, has complained for about eight days of disordered vision,
+the binocular nature of which was proved as patient had herself observed
+that on closing one eye she could at once see clearly. Near objects to
+15 cm. are seen distinctly. With all this, at the first examination it
+was impossible to produce diplopia, either with the aid of a red glass
+or prisms, &c., the images of first one eye, then the other were always
+seen by turns. A few days later, on repeating the examination, double
+images were perceived, they were homonymous with slight difference in
+height (image of the right eye lower), the lateral displacement is
+corrected by a prism of 28 deg. Micropsia of one image was also perceived.
+On both sides the outward movement is rather difficult. Full visual
+acuity on both sides--in the first examination slight myopia - .75 D. is
+specified, afterwards emmetropia. The visual disturbance was removed by
+goggles with faintly ground glass on the right side--preparations of
+iron, bromide salts, shampooing with cold water and electricity were
+used. In six weeks' time binocular single vision was again restored; the
+facultative divergence = 0. With red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms homonymous diplopia corrected by prism 3 deg. Field of vision and
+sense of colour remained normal throughout.
+
+
+
+
+DIVERGENT SQUINT.
+
+
+If we want to draw a comparison between convergent and divergent squint,
+we must consider only absolute divergent strabismus, for convergent
+strabismus does not offer a parallel to relative divergent squint. In
+absolute divergent squint the direction of the visual axes is such that
+they would meet behind the patient's head; in the relative divergent
+squint the axes of vision are parallel or slightly convergent, but they
+do not cross at the point fixed by the one eye, but at a greater
+distance off.
+
+If we then only compare that which admits of comparison, we first find
+out that divergent squint is rarer than the convergent form, and the
+cause contained in the ocular muscles is here brought to light still
+more clearly than there.
+
+We must next distinguish between permanent and periodic squint, and we
+see the latter so frequently continue as such, that we must not consider
+the transition from this variety to the permanent one to be the rule.
+
+In 183 cases of absolute divergent strabismus which appeared in my
+private practice in the same space of time as the cases of convergent
+squint above discussed I have been able to obtain exact determinations
+of the refraction and visual acuteness. The weakness of the fixing eye
+was the test for classing them among the statistics, and in patients who
+had been long under observation, the first certain determination of
+refraction, which was necessary, as several children are included who
+came under treatment with divergent strabismus and emmetropia whilst
+myopia developed itself later.
+
+
+A. Divergent squint with hypermetropia.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 4 cases. Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than
+1/7 1 case, V. less than 1/36 1 case, 2 excluded, one on account of
+complication with detachment of retina, the other on account of
+impossibility of testing vision.
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 5 cases. Among them 3 with double hypermetropia, 2
+with emmetropia in one, and hypermetropia in the other eye. Visual
+acuteness of more than 1/7 in 3 cases; V. = 1/9 1 case; V. = 1/36 1
+case.
+
+
+B. Divergent squint in emmetropia.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 32 cases. Among them 10 with alternating strabismus and
+anisometropia of at least 2 D. And in 9 cases emmetropia in one, myopia
+in the other eye; once simple hypermetropic astigmatism in one, with
+myopic astigmatism in the other eye. Visual acuteness of both eyes in
+these 10 cases more than 1/7. In the 22 cases of monocular squint the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye amounted 8 times to more than 1/7
+-, 10 times 1/12 to 1/36 (in 1 case V. = 1/36 with nystagmus of the
+squinting eye when put into fixation). V. less than 1/36 in 3 cases; 6
+cases excluded on account of complications.
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 28 cases. Among them 5 with anisometropia of at
+least 2 D. (emmetropia in one, myopia in the other eye). Visual
+acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 27 cases, less than 1/7
+to V. = 1/12 in 1 case.
+
+
+C. Divergent squint in myopia to M. = 2 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 24 cases (among them 6 with anisometropia of at least 2
+D.). Visual acuteness of the squinting eye more than 1/7 in 15 cases. V.
+less than 1/7 to V. = 1/12 2; V. less than 1/12 to V. = 1/36 3; V. less
+than 1/36 2 cases; 2 cases excluded on account of complications (one on
+account of atrophy of the optic nerve, the other on account of posterior
+polar cataract).
+
+(_b_) Periodic squint 23 cases. Among them 10 cases with anisometropia
+of at least 2 D. Visual acuteness more than 1/7 in all 23 cases.
+
+
+D. Divergent squint in myopia 2 D. to M. = 4 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 17 cases. Among them 2 with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. to 1/7 9 cases. V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12 1 case. V. < 1/12 to V. =
+1/36 2 cases. V. < 1/36 1 case. Four cases excluded (2 with choroiditis,
+1 with congenital cataract, 1 with traumatic cataract).
+
+(_b_) Periodic 8 cases. Among them 4 with anisometropia of at least 2 D.
+V. to 1/7 7 cases. V. 1/36 1 case.
+
+
+E. Divergent squint in myopia 4 D. to M. 6.5 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 10 cases. V. more than 1/7 in 5; V. less than 1/36 in 3
+cases, 2 excluded (one on account of large anterior synechia, one on
+account of choroiditis of the macula lutea).
+
+(_b_) Periodic 9 cases. Among them one with anisometropia of more than 2
+D. V. more than 1/7 5 cases. V. = 1/9 1 case; 3 cases excluded on
+account of complications.
+
+
+F. Divergent squint in myopia more than 6.5 D.
+
+(_a_) Permanent 8 cases. V. more than 1/7 4 cases, 4 excluded on account
+of choroiditis of the macula lutea.
+
+(_b_) Periodic 10 cases. V. to 1/7 9 cases; V. = 1/12 in one case.
+
+
+_Table of Refraction and Visual Acuteness in Divergent Squint._
+
+[Transcriber's note: Key created to make table fit page]
+
+KEY:
+A: Permanent.
+B: V. to 1/7.
+C: V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12.
+D: V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36.
+E: V. < 1/36.
+F: Excluded.
+G: Periodic.
+H: V. to 1/7.
+I: V. < 1/7 to V. = 1/12.
+J: V. < 1/12 to V. = 1/36.
+K: V. < 1/36.
+L: Excluded.
+
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+ | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L
+-------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--
+Hypermetropia | 4| 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -- | --
+Emmetropia | 37| 18 | -- | 10 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 27 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+Myopia to M. 2 D. | 24| 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 23 | -- | -- | -- | --
+M. 2 D. to 4 D. | 17| 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 7 | -- | 1 | -- | --
+M. 4 D. to 6.5 D. | 10| 5 | -- | -- | 3 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | -- | -- | 3
+M. more than 6.5 D.| 8| 4 | -- | -- | -- | 4 | 10 | 9 | 1 | -- | -- | --
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+ |100| 52 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 20 | 83 | 74 | 4 | 2 | -- | 3
+-------------------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
+
+It follows then from this, that periodic absolute divergent squint is
+just about as frequent as the permanent form and that both become more
+rare as the degrees of myopia increase. As, however, in spite of this,
+myopia is present in about 60 per cent. of all cases, the connection can
+be no other than this, that myopia frequently unites itself with
+insufficiency of the interni and preponderance of the externi; in this
+respect, as in every other, myopia and hypermetropia are directly
+opposed.
+
+The setting up of a "hypermetropic divergent strabismus," dependent on
+hypermetropia, seems to me only to show how much people have been
+carried away by the idea that the cause of the squint must be given by
+the state of refraction. Isler claims 17 to 29 per cent. of the cases
+for hypermetropic divergent strabismus; of these, however, the half
+possess only slight hypermetropia of 2 D. or less, which perfectly
+agrees with the fact that the same observer has also found in convergent
+squint a remarkably high percentage of the lower degrees of
+hypermetropia.
+
+Whether squint originates in the permanent or periodic form depends
+chiefly on whether the movement of convergence is retained or lost.
+There are cases of considerable divergent squint, in which the near
+point of the convergence is scarcely removed, while on the other hand,
+the physiological innervation for convergence may be lost, without
+absolute divergence ever being brought about. In a number of emmetropic
+or slightly myopic cases with absolute preponderance of the externi, the
+physiological connection between accommodation and convergence is
+maintained in a relaxed way; thus, for example, it is impossible to
+converge voluntarily to a large object, as, for instance, a pencil held
+in the vertical line, while accurate convergence immediately follows on
+reading at the same distance; in other cases accommodation can be
+exerted to the near point, without inducing the slightest impulse to
+convergence. This circumstance is worthy of consideration for the
+prognosis of the operation. A mere relaxing of the tie between
+accommodation and convergence may be strengthened by practice, but if
+the impulse to innervation is completely lost, it will scarcely be
+possible to restore it again; as after complete laying aside of absolute
+divergence the relative form still continues to exist.
+
+Those cases deserve special consideration in which emmetropia is present
+in one eye, in the other myopia. Slight degrees of one-sided myopia
+reconcile themselves with the continuance of a normal binocular act of
+vision. If the far point of the myopic eye lies at an inconvenient
+proximity even for reading, then, as a rule, the emmetropic eye is used
+for near as well as distant objects; if, on the contrary, the degree of
+myopia answers to a range of vision convenient for working, and visual
+acuteness is normal, then the temptation to use the emmetropic eye only
+for distance and the myopic one only for near objects is so
+overpowering, and the advantages on the other hand which would be
+offered by clinging to binocular vision so slight, that a convenient
+monocular vision is generally preferred. Even for objects which lie
+nearer the eye than the far point of the myopic, and at the same time
+farther than the near point of the emmetropic eye, for which, therefore,
+both eyes could secure clear retinal images, binocular vision is not
+used. In cases in which the patient can read with proper binocular
+fixation, if one covers all but one line and then makes with prisms
+double images standing one above another, it is the myopic eye alone
+which almost invariably shows a clear retinal image.
+
+The usual result of this is, first a relaxing of binocular vision, and
+as together with this the motive for convergence, namely, the effort of
+the accommodation ceases, the conditions for the commencement of
+divergence are produced. Still the elastic tension of the ocular muscles
+decides even here; if the interni preponderate, convergent squint
+results, when the myopic eye is used for near objects, the emmetropic
+for distant ones. If the externi preponderate, then permanent or
+periodic divergent strabismus is caused. Nevertheless, in a remarkable
+minority of cases the elastic tension of the ocular muscles is so
+regulated that, despite relaxation of binocular fusion, neither
+convergent squint nor absolute divergence occurs, but simple relative
+divergence remains with employment of the myopic eye for near objects.
+
+
+
+
+DYNAMIC SQUINT, INSUFFICIENCY OF THE INTERNI AND MUSCULAR ASTHENOPIA.
+
+
+The habit of binocular single vision, when it has once reached its
+normal development, governs the movements of our eyes to a great degree;
+the desire to avoid double images makes itself continually felt; and
+where this is not possible, an uncomfortable feeling of uncertainty
+arises at every movement of the body. Double images are prevented as far
+as possible by movements of the eyes, which we must designate as
+voluntary when we are conscious of their occurrence.
+
+If we follow a moving object with the eyes, the latter make
+corresponding movements in order to keep the image in the centre of both
+retinae. For example, if we look at a distant object which approaches in
+the direction of one visual axis, this eye will necessarily remain
+still, while the other will be put into convergence in proportion as the
+object advances. If this did not happen, if this eye remained also
+immovable, the retinal image would deviate outwards more and more from
+the macula lutea and diplopia would arise. In order then to avoid
+diplopia the macula lutea moves to where the retinal image is formed. We
+can, however, move the images on the retina by the aid of prisms without
+movement of the object. If, for example, we hold a prism before the eye
+so that the base lies towards the temporal side, the retinal image will
+be displaced towards the base of the prism, outwards then from the
+macula, and double images will occur, which are at once removed by a
+distinctly perceptible inward movement of the eye. In this way, by means
+of a prism applied with the base inwards, outward deviation may be
+produced, and even in a modified way deviations in height of the visual
+axes by means of prisms with the base upwards or downwards. Here the
+force of habit is apparent, for in the daily use of our eyes we
+continually practise the inward movement of the visual axes; we can also
+easily restore the customary degree of convergence by means of prisms
+with the bases outwards; physiologically indeed, it is quite immaterial
+whether an object is in a proximity to our eyes attainable by
+convergence, which causes double images until it is binocularly fixed,
+or whether by the aid of prisms we bring the retinal images of a distant
+object to parts of the retinae which do not correspond. If we look at a
+distant object fixed with parallel visual axes, under normal
+circumstances, prisms of 6 deg. to 8 deg. with the base inwards can be overcome,
+that is to say, as in weak prisms the deviation is equal to about half
+of the prism, an absolute divergence of the visual axes of 3 deg. to 4 deg. may
+be produced by which the double images are blended. It is immaterial
+whether we apply a prism of, say 8 deg. to one eye, or prisms of 4 deg. with the
+bases inwards to both. The facultative divergence thus attainable
+remains the same, which speaks for the fact, that this monolateral
+movement attainable by prisms is also combined with double innervation;
+and of course in the eye remaining in unmoved fixation, with impulses to
+innervation which are reciprocally abolished.
+
+In the physiological use of our eyes we certainly never have occasion to
+practise absolute divergence, but we constantly practise the transition
+from the inward to the outward movement of the eyes, and experiments
+with prisms teach us, that the innervation of the externi therewith
+connected may even be carried somewhat beyond the physiological limits
+of parallelism. Moreover, the extent of the "facultative" divergence
+attainable by prisms shows a considerable latitude.
+
+The case is similar with deviation in height of the visual axes. In
+looking upwards or downwards the innervation of both eyes is usually
+precisely the same, but on looking at any point when holding the head
+obliquely, the difference in height of the eyes then present must be
+balanced by a corresponding difference in the direction of the visual
+axes. The same thing happens, if we hold a vertically deviating prism in
+front of one eye in binocular vision; prisms of 2 deg. to 3 deg. may then be
+overcome by difference in height of the eyes; rarely is a much greater
+difference in height of the visual axes attainable. I have seen this
+particularly in those cases where facultative divergence also was
+greater than usual.
+
+It happens especially in myopia that prisms of considerably more than 6 deg.
+to 8 deg. are overcome by divergence, and certainly without causing any
+inconvenience. Among the cases presented for examination, those, of
+course, are most numerous where the patients have some complaint to
+make, even if this have quite a different cause. In any case a divergent
+position of the axes of vision corresponds to the balance of the
+muscles, and this does not generally occur, for this reason, because
+retaining binocular single vision necessitates a parallel or convergent
+position of the eyes. Frequently, however, even a slight impediment to
+binocular fusion, such as the application of a red glass to one eye,
+suffices to procure preponderance in the elastic tensions of the
+muscles, and to cause the fixed point to appear double. We can put a
+stop to binocular single vision still more surely by applying to one eye
+a prism with the base upwards or downwards. If the double images of a
+point 4 to 5 meters distant show a crossed lateral position besides the
+difference in height caused by the prism, we may assume that an
+absolute divergent position of the eyes corresponds to the elastic
+tension of the muscles; and the measure of the deviation will be given
+by those prisms which, placed with the bases inwards before one or both
+eyes, bring the double images perpendicularly over one another. As a
+rule, in these cases the degree of divergence which occurs on cessation
+of binocular single vision, is almost as great as the facultative
+divergence, which may be reached in the interest of binocular single
+vision.
+
+V. Graefe designates as "dynamic squint" that condition in which the
+position of divergence corresponding to the state of tension of the
+muscles does not occur because binocular vision is retained. Without
+clearly defined limits these conditions pass on into periodic squint,
+when either diplopia occurs together with the divergence, or the habit
+of binocular fusion becomes less frequent or is quite forgotten, while,
+however, according to the varying state of the muscles sometimes normal
+position, sometimes divergence, is present. A correct position of the
+eyes is quite possible even without binocular fusion, then only the
+regulator is wanting, which, in the varying play of the muscular forces,
+ensures the balance of position and movement.
+
+The older ophthalmologists had a parallel strabismus and probably
+understood by that, what we now designate as relative divergence. The
+connection between relative divergence and myopia, pointed out by
+Donders, is universally admitted; on the other hand, in more modern
+literature we scarcely find any intimation of the fact that a parallel
+squint occurs, which is quite independent of myopia, and rests solely on
+the fact that the impulse of innervation for convergence is lost. A few
+examples may explain this condition.
+
+CASE 13.--Auguste T--, aet. 28. On the left emmetropia, V. 12/20. On the
+right the visual acuteness is variously given, but certainly does not
+amount to more than 1/5 nor less than 1/10 of the normal.
+Ophthalmoscopic report normal. The left eye is naturally the fixing one,
+the right always remains parallel--for near objects double images are
+present. A convergent movement is not attained, either for near objects,
+or by means of prisms with bases outwards for distant ones. Prisms with
+the bases inwards are not overcome; with vertically deviating prisms the
+double images of distant objects stand perpendicularly above one
+another.
+
+CASE 14.--Ludwig v. K--, aet 32, has complained of diplopia repeatedly
+for fifteen years. Statement in August, 1877: Convergence to a pencil
+held before patient on the median line is only retained to about 50 cm.,
+nearer, crossed diplopia occurs. In reading, binocular fixation is
+possible with an effort at a nearer point. The facultative divergence
+does not amount to more than 3 deg.; even by convergence to a distance of 4
+mtr. prisms of 3 deg. only are overcome. Emmetropia and full visual acuity
+on both sides. In Sept., 1880, three years after, the statement remained
+unaltered. Patient has only used the prismatic spectacles then
+prescribed off and on, as the symptoms are sometimes more troublesome,
+sometimes less so, and he exerts his eyes but little on the whole.
+
+A restriction of movement of the internal recti did not exist in these
+cases; the absence of the convergent movement is not then to be set down
+to the interni not possessing the proper power for acting, but only to
+the fact that the impulse for their simultaneous innervation was
+wanting. We frequently find this absence of innervation in divergent
+squint, and then generally consider it to be a consequence of the
+squint, which, however, as the above cases show, need not necessarily be
+the case. If preponderance of the externi is at the same time present,
+absolute divergence is the result, but not always permanent squint,
+frequently only the periodic form. The anomaly of innervation may also
+usually be proved in such cases, in that after the removal by operation
+of the absolute divergence it continues to exist in the relative form;
+it can indeed happen that for a few days after the operation convergent
+squint is present for distance, together with relative divergence for
+near objects.
+
+The highest phases of this anomaly, as represented in Cases 13 and 14,
+are seldom seen. Slighter degrees, which, like so many other things, are
+usually designated as "insufficiency of the interni," are more
+frequently met with and are combined with asthenopia. On the one hand,
+in looking at near objects a tendency exists to the formation of double
+images, which are removed by the action of the interni; on the other
+hand, however, the habit of binocular single vision is relinquished on
+account of the frequent diplopia. In all forms of squint we see that
+binocular fusion is forgotten; still it seems more natural to assume
+this to be the result, and not the cause of the squint, as Krenchel
+does.
+
+Another form of relative divergence is that which is brought about in
+consequence of extreme myopia. The change in form of the myopic eye
+diminishes its mobility, associated movements of the eyes may be
+replaced by turning the head, but this is not possible for the movement
+of convergence. Further, in extreme myopia the far point is generally
+used for reading, &c., and sometimes even a somewhat greater distance,
+because on account of the close proximity of the objects the retinal
+images are so large that they are sufficiently clearly recognised even
+if they are not quite distinct. At all events accommodation certainly
+does not take place, hence one motive favouring convergence is removed.
+
+Finally, however, such considerable convergence as clear vision demands
+in high degrees of myopia, would be difficult even for a normally
+movable eye. Reasons enough therefore exist for giving up binocular
+fixation and using only the more convenient eye for reading, without
+effort to the accommodation and convergence. In myopia of high degree
+patients almost always read with relative divergence, and these myopes
+do just what we must advise them to do, they avoid strain of the
+accommodation and convergence of the visual axes and thus keep well.
+
+Notwithstanding that this condition necessarily results from the nature
+of extreme myopia, it is frequently held to be pathological, which it
+certainly is not in itself. At most, the short-sightedness and change in
+form of the eye are pathological; the relative divergence on the other
+hand is simply a harmless result of the above conditions.
+
+No doubts whatever exist about this relative divergence. The theory that
+the demands on the working eye must be very much increased is quite
+unfounded. If any harmful influence were to be feared for the fixing
+eye, one would observe the same in convergent squint, when, as a rule,
+one eye only is used for fixation even after operation.
+
+In convergent strabismus, however, no one, at least no ophthalmologist,
+thinks of entertaining such fears for the eye used in fixation, and
+where is the physiological basis of this whole idea to be found? Is the
+visual purple more active in monocular than in binocular vision, or what
+physiological activity is thereby taxed in increased degree?
+
+I have found no confirmation of Alfred Graefe's theory that in myopia
+the eye chiefly used in fixation is frequently affected with choroiditis
+of the macula lutea, &c., but have only observed that patients to whom
+this happens seek the advice of a physician more eagerly than when the
+same intra-ocular troubles befall the other usually neglected eye in
+connection with myopia.
+
+Muscular asthenopia undoubtedly occurs; it is only a question whether it
+is as frequent as it is diagnosed. It has its foundation in that the
+convergence necessary for reading, writing, &c., can only be sustained
+by an effort of the internal recti, which exceeds their strength, and
+finally results in painful fatigue of the muscles, just as accommodative
+asthenopia depends on painful fatigue of the muscles of accommodation.
+The similarity reaches still further. We occasionally find that despite
+considerable degrees of hypermetropia no asthenopia occurs even in
+persons who strain their eyes; while, on the other hand, asthenopic
+troubles appear in hypermetropia which are not removed by correction of
+the refraction and must consequently have some other motive. Yet still
+more is this the case with those disorders, of which muscular asthenopia
+may be supposed to be the cause. Notwithstanding the existence of a
+considerable preponderance of the externi, muscular asthenopia may be
+entirely absent. If we find, for example, that as soon as we do away
+with binocular single vision absolute divergence occurs even on looking
+at a distant fixed point, and that prisms of 12 deg. to 30 deg. are overcome by
+divergence, we may safely assume that the elastic preponderance of the
+externi must be overcome in reading, &c., in the interest of binocular,
+single vision by a stronger muscular effort of the interni, which is,
+however, very frequently accomplished without fatigue. Asthenopic
+disorders are also frequently present together with preponderance of the
+externi, which continue to exist despite the removal of the same by
+operation, and must consequently have some other cause. The diagnosis of
+accommodative asthenopia is as a rule confirmed _ex juvantibus_; this
+cannot be asserted for the muscular form.
+
+For example, Case 15.--Mathilde F--, aet. 21, has suffered from
+asthenopic disorders for three years. The investigation at the beginning
+of January, 1880, shows: On the left, myopia 4 D., V. = 5/18, No. 0.3 is
+read at 10 cm.; on the right, myopia 6 D., V. 5/24, 0.3 is read with
+difficulty, cylindrical glasses cause no improvement. Patient converges
+to about 8 cm., on exclusion absolute divergence of 3 to 4 mm. follows,
+with slight upward deviation of the right eye.
+
+On correction of the myopia the facultative divergence amounts to = 26 deg.
+Here one might easily have concluded the asthenopia to be a result of
+fatigue of the interni, but this opinion was refuted by the effect of
+the treatment. The double tenotomy of the externi performed on January
+2nd was first followed by convergent squint with homonymous double
+images, which were united by a prism of 12 deg. with the base inwards. In
+the course of a few days single vision was again restored. A fortnight
+after the operation, on correction of the myopia, patient could see
+singly to 3 mtr.: towards both sides homonymous double images were still
+present, and in fixation to 30 cm. relative divergence on exclusion of
+one eye. Six months after the operation, on correction of the myopia and
+application of red glass to one eye, crossed double images occur close
+together, which become homonymous by means of a prism of 3 deg. with the
+base inwards. Patient sees double images always, without being much
+disturbed by them, yet they cannot be united by means of prisms. The
+habit of binocular single vision has also gradually been lost. In
+reading (without correction) a movement of convergence takes place (it
+cannot be determined whether this answers exactly to the distance of the
+object). If, on the other hand, one asks the patient to fix binocularly
+larger objects, such as a pencil close to her, she is unable to do it,
+relative divergence occurs then, as well as on exclusion of one eye. The
+asthenopic disorders remain unchanged and are not removed even by
+prismatic spectacles. Despite all reasons then for the supposition the
+asthenopia was certainly not of a muscular nature.
+
+The uncertainty as to diagnosis is still greater in those cases which,
+according to v. Graefe, were to be designated as dynamic relative
+divergence; cases in which with parallel visual axes a disturbed
+balance is not present but occurs on convergence in such a way that the
+interni only perform their destined work with difficulty, and are
+nevertheless urged on in the interest of binocular single vision, till
+they give way in painful fatigue.
+
+According to v. Graefe the diagnosis of this condition must be carried
+out in the following way. First of all the convergence must be fixed on
+a near object in the median line; if one eye remains behind in the
+movement it may be accounted for in various ways, for example, the
+impediment of movement caused by the change in form of the eye in myopia
+or the faulty innervation of the interni mentioned on p. 54. In both
+cases for the most part no dynamic, but manifest relative divergence is
+present in viewing near objects. It may also happen that the patient
+does not converge sufficiently, merely because accommodation is absent.
+This experiment does not then prove the presence of dynamic relative
+convergence, and v. Graefe came to the conclusion, therefore, that a
+normal position of the eyes obtained only by the habit of binocular
+single vision must be relinquished so soon as we cause binocular single
+vision to cease. Just as under these circumstances dynamic absolute
+divergence is manifested in the observance of distant objects, so must
+this be the case in dynamic relative divergence in the observance of
+near objects. One eye is first excluded while looking at an object about
+25 cm. distant, to determine whether it still remains in a proper
+position for fixation. We have reason to believe that the position which
+occurs in the excluded eye answers to the given conditions of tension of
+the muscles. Still it is not necessary to cause binocular vision quite
+to cease, it is sufficient and even more advantageous, simply to make
+binocular single vision impossible, which we are able to do by means of
+prisms. If, for example, a point be fixed lying at the usual distance
+for work of 25 to 30 cm., or, according to v. Graefe, a large spot
+intersected by a vertical line, and one then applies a vertically
+deviating prism to one eye, the influence of binocular single vision on
+the ocular muscles is removed, as the fusion of the double images
+standing above one another is impossible; and nothing prevents the
+assumption of a relative position of divergence instead of a proper
+convergent one; as a result of this the double images show a crossed
+lateral position as well as the difference in height produced by the
+prism. The extent of this lateral deviation may be measured by means of
+prisms, which being applied to the eyes with the bases inwards place the
+double images again perpendicularly above one another. Von Graefe holds
+it to be of importance to determine the strongest prisms which can be
+overcome for the given distance by means of convergence and by the
+outward movement of the eyes.
+
+On the strength of this method of inquiry there is a prevalence of
+opinion that the asthenopic disorders common in myopia are caused by
+over-exertion of the ocular muscles; indeed people believe this so
+strongly that they assume the presence of muscular asthenopia even in
+individuals in whom the habit of working with relative divergence is
+already firmly rooted. Relative divergence may perchance cause annoyance
+through double images, though this really seldom happens, but it can
+never cause muscular asthenopia, for the internal recti muscles protect
+themselves by means of relative divergence from any stronger exertion.
+
+Asthenopic disturbances are certainly frequent in myopia, but the above
+method of inquiry does not at all prove that their cause lies in the
+ocular muscles, for those appearances from which one concludes dynamic
+relative divergence and muscular asthenopia, are found in almost all
+myopes, even when the latter have no asthenopic troubles, for they owe
+their origin to the nature of the myopia. Myopes learn to converge to
+the distance of their far point, without exerting the accommodation; if
+we now cause a point at this distance to be fixed and then exclude one
+eye, or make binocular fusion impossible by means of vertical prisms,
+what imaginable reason is there for the excluded eye to remain in proper
+fixation? In emmetropia the habitual relation between accommodation and
+convergence will be able to ensure that the excluded eye also remains
+covering the fixed object, convergently as well as accommodatively; in
+myopia, every discretionary relative divergence up to parallelism of the
+lines of vision is perfectly justified, because no effort of the
+accommodation takes place. How in the world can it be held to be
+pathological that a movement of convergence does not occur, when one has
+just artificially removed all those physiological conditions which could
+possibly have brought it about? If one now likes, as v. Graefe proposes,
+to determine the prisms, which can be overcome by means of the outward
+movement, there is no doubt about the fact, that with the aid of prisms
+the lines of vision may be made parallel or even divergent, the retinal
+images indeed, always retaining the same distinctness, in so far as they
+are not injured by the prismatic diffusion of colours. There is just as
+little reason why the convergence usually attainable should not also be
+restored by the aid of prisms with the bases outwards, the retinal
+images are not only impaired by the prisms, but the accommodation united
+with the convergence, no longer corresponds to the real distance of the
+fixed point.
+
+Enough, all these incidents, which are to prove the presence of muscular
+asthenopia in myopia, occur when the investigation is carried out as
+usual in the region of the far point, entirely on a physiological basis,
+and must not therefore be held to be pathological without further proof.
+
+The proof of muscular asthenopia in slight degrees of myopia,
+emmetropia, or hypermetropia, is somewhat more certain; a deviation from
+physiological laws is certainly present, if we find that the
+corresponding convergence does not unite itself with the accommodation
+for a near object, we must be quite sure that an exact accommodation for
+the fixed point is also really present. It by no means follows because
+one causes a large black spot to be observed at a distance of 25 to 30
+cm., that an exact accommodation takes place; one can see these things
+even with circles of diffusion, the retinal images are already dimmed by
+means of the prisms, and one can easily convince one's self that, on the
+renunciation of clear retinal images, normal eyes can reach every
+attainable convergence or relative divergence by means of prisms.
+Insufficient accommodation and defective convergence are, however,
+easily caused by all painful sensations situated near the eye, which
+make the accommodation uncomfortable and fatiguing. This applies to
+every common head- or tooth-ache, and in the same manner to disturbances
+arising in the conjunctiva, or which depend on the stretching of the
+collective tunics of the eye in myopia, or which allow any other
+so-called "nervous" origin to be suspected.
+
+We must place the same claims to the diagnosis of muscular asthenopia as
+to that of the accommodative form. Just as the latter is only detected
+if convex glasses really give the expected relief, so the proof of
+muscular asthenopia is only furnished when relief to the interni is
+brought about by means of the appropriate remedies. For myopes, who do
+not fall back on the aid of relative divergence, notwithstanding that
+they possess a clear field of vision only attainable with difficulty
+through convergence, it is the simplest plan to remove the far point to
+about 25 to 30 cm. by specially adapted concave glasses. If only slight
+myopia or none at all is present, but the relation between accommodation
+and convergence is disturbed, the latter can be corrected by means of
+prisms with the bases inwards--to be sure, only in a slight degree, as
+prisms of more than 4 deg. are scarcely suited for spectacles, partly on
+account of their weight and partly on account of the diffusion of
+colours. Prisms may be ground with concave or convex surfaces, according
+to the requirements of refraction or accommodation.
+
+Finally, if an elastic preponderance of the externi can be proved by
+means of considerable facultative divergence, the same may be lessened
+by tenotomy of one or both externi; still after my own experience I
+cannot advise the performance of this operation unless prisms of at
+least 16 deg. are overcome by absolute divergence, for I have seen many
+patients in other practices who have acquired convergent squint and
+diplopia for distance as the sole result of the operation, while the
+asthenopic troubles for near objects continue. The proof that it is not
+a case of muscular asthenopia is sometimes only obtained by the
+operation.
+
+
+
+
+BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT.
+
+
+The fact that those who squint do not as a rule have diplopia, while
+squints depending on paralysis of the ocular muscles are combined with
+diplopia, was difficult to explain as long as the view was adhered to of
+identical retinal areas founded on anatomical construction. The first
+explanation hit upon was that a false identity became established, an
+inequality of the retinae; were this the case diplopia must of necessity
+occur on correction of the squint by tenotomy.
+
+Commencing with the assumption of a congenital identity which led under
+all circumstances to the occurrence of diplopia as soon as the images of
+the same object fell in both eyes upon non-identical points of the
+retinae, the hypothesis was next advanced that the image of the squinting
+eye was not perceived, that a constant suppression of the sensations in
+the squinting eye took place. Suppression of sense-impressions does take
+place; as soon as our attention is entirely engrossed upon anything, we
+are in a position to disregard the impressions upon all other organs of
+sense; they do not reach our consciousness. That visual sensations are
+easily disregarded may be proved by experiments. Hold a small plane
+mirror obliquely before one eye, with the brim pressed into the angle of
+the nose so that the objects lying at the side and behind are seen in
+the mirror. If the other eye is now used to read with, it is quite easy
+to disregard the objects seen in the mirror provided that our attention
+is not attracted to places by a particularly bright light. No doubt
+those who squint also possess this physiological power, and it is
+therefore certain that they make use of it under certain circumstances;
+but the suppression theory necessitates that they should constantly and
+always do so, since diplopia is bound to occur directly they do not do
+it.
+
+The absence of double vision is in fact the only evidence that can be
+adduced in favour of the exclusion theory; this negative fact, however,
+proves nothing, and is, moreover, capable of other explanations, as soon
+as one abandons the theory of congenital retinal identity. The
+examination of those who squint demonstrates the untenability of this
+theory. People who squint seldom complain of diplopia, but double images
+can be rendered apparent in a comparatively large proportion of cases,
+usually with the greatest ease, by covering the best eye with a red
+glass and squinting with a vertically deviating prism. Many squinters
+now admit the presence of double images, but their position by no means
+corresponds to the identity theory, their lateral displacement is far
+too slight, or patients find themselves unable to localise the position
+of the image. It sometimes happens that alternating vision with both
+eyes is mistaken for diplopia, the images are then invariably specified
+as homonymous; however, with attention it is easy to distinguish this
+alternating vision from the simultaneous perception of two images of one
+and the same object.
+
+There can be no doubt that in most cases the position of the double
+images does not correspond to the principle of identity, and just as
+little doubt that one to whom double images are easily made apparent
+cannot possess the confirmed habit of always suppressing the image of
+the squinting eye. A certain number of cases remain in which it is
+impossible to produce diplopia; that these, however, do not constantly
+suppress the image of the squinting eye may be proved in the very simple
+way I have indicated. An object of fixation is placed in a darkened
+room, on one side of and behind the squinting eye is placed a small
+flame, the reflection of which, by means of a plane mirror before the
+squinting eye is thrown upon its retina. The reflection of the flame is
+seen on the cornea of the squinting eye, by slight rotation of the glass
+it can be brought into the area of the pupil, and at the same instant
+the patient sees the light, the reflection of which can easily be made
+to coincide with the image of the fixation object seen by the other eye.
+The experiment has then an entirely objective basis, it always succeeds,
+a fact on which I lay special stress, even in eyes whose vision is very
+defective; therefore here also the habit of suppression of the retinal
+images of the squinting eye is not present.
+
+That the squinting eye really possesses its full share of the visual
+field can easily be proved (especially in divergent squint) by the aid
+of a perimeter. The best eye is covered with a red glass, so that the
+objects projected from the fixation point, as well as the excentric
+field of vision of this eye, appear red. As soon as the test object
+moves towards the side of the squinting eye and enters the visual area
+covered by the latter, it appears in its natural white colour, and this
+in most cases before it has reached the centre of the retina of this
+eye.
+
+Another proof that the squinting eye is really used for vision appears
+to me to lie in the fact that persons who squint, provided of course
+that the vision of the eye concerned is not very defective, do not show
+that uncertainty in the estimation of distance, which is apt to prove so
+troublesome to those who have only monocular vision.
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 1.]
+
+If, then, the view of the constant suppression of the retinal images of
+the squinting eye is untenable, how is it to be explained that squint as
+the result of paralysis of the ocular muscles causes diplopia, while
+concomitant squint does not? The answer to this question is clear as
+soon as we abandon the supposition of a congenital retinal identity, and
+look instead upon the relation of the eyes to each other as harmonious;
+identity, or co-ordination as something acquired. Central fixation is
+congenital and depends upon anatomical conditions, for as the macula
+lutea is anatomically the most perfect part of the retina, it is natural
+that the new-born child soon learns to place this part of the retina
+opposite objects which attract its attention, and therefore those
+relations of the eyes to each other are naturally developed. For
+instance, if both eyes (Fig. 1) are directed to the distant point _a_,
+the image of point _b_, situated at the same distance, will fall on the
+inner half of the retina of the left eye; the left eye will now learn by
+experience to refer inner retinal images to objects lying to the left of
+the fixation point; at the same time, however, with binocular fixation,
+the right eye learns to seek the images of the temporal half of its
+retina in the left field of vision, and _vice versa_. From this it is
+easy to trace the laws of binocular diplopia. For example, let _a_ in
+Fig. 2 be the fixation point, while at the same time the image of _b_
+belongs in both eyes to the temporal half of the retina. Now, as we have
+already seen, the right eye has learnt to refer temporal retinal images,
+to objects lying to the left of the fixation point, while for the same
+reasons the left eye projects temporal images to the right. While then
+point _a_ is seen binocularly singly, point _b_ appears double, and
+certainly the image of the right eye is projected to the left of the
+fixation point, and that of the left eye to the right of it, in other
+words, crossed diplopia is present. But the eyes are divergent relative
+to point _b_; double images then which occur as a result of divergence
+(whether relative or absolute) must appear crossed, and one will easily
+be able to infer that for the same reasons those double images which
+occur in consequence of convergence, must be homonymous. All this,
+however, only with the presupposition, that the habit of binocular
+fixation is already fully developed; any disturbance of the same, in
+whatever way (by prisms, mechanical displacement of the eyes, paralyses
+of the ocular muscles, or by those forms of squint which arise after
+childhood is past) causes the double images to illustrate the law above
+explained. Certainly diplopia may be absent even then, but only in very
+rare instances. Now and then this happens in objectively proved ailments
+of the ocular muscles, where the patients complain of disturbed vision,
+which disappears immediately on the exclusion of one eye (see Case 12),
+a method of relief they usually discover for themselves; thus the
+indistinct vision is seen at once to be a disturbance of binocular
+vision. Many such patients learn to see the double images which formerly
+escaped them, after they have been instructed how to do so during the
+examination. With others, all efforts are in vain, it is impossible to
+render them conscious of the double images, notwithstanding that the
+presence of the binocular disturbance of vision proves that the habit of
+binocular fixation exists. This apparent contradiction is explained, if
+one reflects that the physiological basis of vision rests on a series of
+conclusions. The first thing which strikes us as a result of binocular
+fixation is, that the images of the centres of the retinae may be
+referred to one and the same region of the room, and this experience
+will be retained, even if the images on the centres of the retinae
+represent different objects in consequence of paralysis of the ocular
+muscles; the images are notwithstanding referred to one and the same
+part of the room, all objects are thrown together promiscuously, and the
+consequent embarrassment is of course removed directly one eye is shut.
+The experience of those patients whom it is impossible to render
+conscious of double images, despite the habit of binocular fixation,
+reaches up to this point. A second conclusion belongs to diplopia, and
+for that it is necessary to seek out from the confusion of objects, the
+two retinal images belonging to one and the same object, and the
+majority of people, though not all, take this second step also. It is
+seen at the same time that the opinion held by Donders, that diplopia is
+absent in squint, does not suffice, for this reason, because the image
+in the deviating eye is too excentric. What becomes then of the image
+lying in the centre of the retina?
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
+
+The absence of diplopia in squint may be explained quite simply by the
+fact that the habit of binocular fixation has not been learnt or has
+been forgotten; one can learn nothing that cannot be again forgotten.
+The normal fusion of the visual fields can only develop in consequence
+of binocular fixation, and diplopia is only possible when some kind of
+binocular fusion exists. If no binocular fusion exists, then all
+possibility of diplopia is excluded. And why should those who squint
+from their earliest childhood not see well with both eyes, but yet with
+each separately, just as is the case with animals with laterally placed
+eyes? For example, in Fig. 3 there is convergent squint of the left eye,
+the right eye fixes the point a, whose retinal image is cast at _a_' in
+the left eye; the direction outwards in which these images are projected
+is discovered by drawing a straight line from _a_ to _c_ (the optical
+centre of the eye); suffice it to say that point _a_ is seen by each eye
+in the direction in which it really stands.
+
+[Illustration: FIG. 3.]
+
+But although both eyes see at the same time, yet the close relation
+which in binocular fixation develops between the centres of the retinae
+does not occur in squint; firstly, because the retinal area in the
+squinting eye which corresponds to the fixation point is too excentric,
+and secondly, because the angle of the squint often changes. In
+binocular fixation, the fixation point of one retina answers to the
+corresponding point of the other; in squint, on account of the varying
+size of the squint angle, if a like relation develops between the eyes,
+the fixation point of one retina must correspond to a larger area of the
+other. Possibly this explains a fact that is often to be observed. In
+those cases of squint where diplopia can easily be caused by covering
+one eye with a red glass and the other with a vertically deviating
+prism, the double images disappear on rotation of the prism round the
+axis of vision, as soon as the angle of the prism reaches an angle of
+about 45 deg. The occurrence of double images shows that there exists for
+the upper and lower parts of the retinae a community of vision by no
+means coinciding with the identity principle. The disappearance of the
+diplopia can be explained by the fact that the variations of the squint
+angle take place chiefly in the horizontal direction. Therefore the area
+in the squinting eye that corresponds to the fovea centralis of the
+fixing eye must be more extensive in the horizontal than in the vertical
+direction. Alfred Graefe has designated this phenomenon as "regional
+exclusion." Whilst then a sort of community of vision exists for the
+upper and lower parts of the retinae, the sensations of the retinal area
+lying in the horizontal plane of the macula lutea of the squinting eye
+must be suppressed. The physiological occurrence of a suppression of the
+retinal images, as far as we are able to investigate it, always refers
+to the whole retina; however, the possibility of a "regional exclusion"
+should not be excluded to begin with; but in the inductive sciences it
+is for us to ask first, whether an incident really happens, and not
+whether it is possible. The fact from which Alfred Graefe draws his
+inference is not, as we have just seen, to be explained in any other
+way, and the ophthalmoscopic test described on p. 65 proves that also in
+these cases of "regional exclusion" both eyes are used for vision.
+
+In many cases of periodic squint the condition of binocular vision is
+very interesting. Binocular fusion may be quite absent even in normal
+position of the eyes; on the other hand the non-occurrence of diplopia
+in squint does not prevent the occurrence of perfect binocular fusion
+with a normal position. In periodic outward squint I have sometimes seen
+binocular fixation without the existence of binocular fusion; the
+excluded eye deviates outwards, but as soon as it is free it puts itself
+into fixation, whilst neither with prisms nor stereoscope can anything
+other than alternating vision be proved, _i. e._ neither binocular
+diplopia nor fusion.
+
+If squint arises when the habit of binocular single vision has become
+confirmed, diplopia is always present, at least at first; even children
+of six to seven years old make this statement uninvited, but they soon
+get accustomed to the new relations, and after a short time it is
+impossible to make them see double images (see Case 42). Habits cling
+more closely in adults, therefore that form of convergent squint in
+particular, which usually develops quickly in myopia of average degree,
+causes annoying diplopia to last for a longer time. For just when these
+patients want to employ binocular vision in order to estimate distance
+correctly, diplopia occurs to hinder and confuse them.
+
+It is otherwise with the relative divergence which is developed in
+consequence of myopia. At first diplopia is present here for a short
+time; in this case circumstances are specially favorable to a temporary
+suppression of the deviating eye; the fixing eye receives large distinct
+images to which the attention is directed. Meanwhile the relatively
+divergent eye is usually turned to other more distant objects that
+furnish indistinct retinal images, from which the attention is easily
+diverted. The habit of suppression may become so dominant that binocular
+fixation continues to exist for distant objects and the presence of
+binocular fusion is easily traceable, while for near objects, which are
+monocularly fixed with relative divergence, it is impossible to render
+the patient conscious of the images of the deviating eye.
+
+Considerable squint is by no means necessary for the cessation of normal
+binocular single vision; slight, frequently recurring deviations are
+quite sufficient, as in those cases where want of control renders
+physiological innervation for convergence more difficult. Double images
+are present here, although not in a troublesome way, as is usual in
+relative divergence, but binocular single vision does not exist even for
+distance. The reason for this does not lie in the impossibility of
+fixing the same object simultaneously with both eyes, for the
+objectively proved deviation may be extremely slight. A union cannot be
+obtained even by prisms. If crossed double images are present close
+together, a prism of a few degrees base inwards suffices to make them
+homonymous. The habit of binocular single vision is lost, in consequence
+of that disturbance to the innervation of the interni which is
+designated as insufficiency of the same.
+
+The stereoscope, as well as the prism, is useful for testing binocular
+single vision, especially when it is suitably modified for the purpose.
+The prismatic glasses usually attached to stereoscopes are here quite
+superfluous. The advantage of the prismatic deviation consists solely in
+the fact that the centres of the images fixed for the macula lutea on
+each side can be removed farther from one another than the distance
+apart of the eyes amounts to, so that a greater extension of the visual
+area is rendered possible. Ordinary stereoscopic pictures are quite
+useless for testing binocular vision; it is a question here of employing
+diagrams, which contain on the one hand very prominent identical figures
+stimulating binocular fusion but which, on the other hand, offer for
+each eye special attractions not present in the visual field of the
+other. Further, it is desirable to regulate the stereoscope so that the
+glasses are not firmly inserted, but that glasses from the trial case
+may be applied according to the condition of refraction of the patient
+and the distance of the stereoscopic images.
+
+The stereoscope is generally used with the greatest advantage in those
+cases where there is no conspicuous deviation, and by testing binocular
+vision conclusions may be drawn as to whether normal binocular fusion
+exists or has disappeared in consequence of the squint.
+
+It is desirable to use both methods of investigation, that with the
+stereoscope as well as prisms, as each test has its own value. One who
+at once combines the stereoscopic fields of vision certainly has
+binocular single vision; in other cases this is only so far lost that
+the stereoscopic combination does not take place at once but only after
+some trouble. Care must be taken, especially when one eye has defective
+vision, that the corresponding visual field contains objects
+sufficiently large and easily recognisable, as very small objects which
+do not correspond to the lowered visual acuity are easily overlooked. It
+sometimes happens that both fields are seen at the same time, but that
+there is no fusion; finally it happens frequently that there is complete
+suppression of one visual field. In testing with prisms it may appear
+doubtful as to whether binocular fusion or suppression of one eye
+exists; however, the stereoscope at once gives us certain information.
+It must not be forgotten that the altered relations between the eyes,
+which are always possible in squint, also appear at the same time; he
+who sees double with prisms, may yet be able completely to suppress the
+stereoscopic visual field of one eye. Binocular fusion, suppression of
+the squinting eye and simultaneous vision with both eyes without
+binocular fusion can alternate in the same individual. Von Kries has
+come to the same conclusion, and if our colleague is unable to explain
+all the phenomena of binocular vision that he could observe in his own
+case, we need not be astonished if we sometimes hear from our patients
+statements that appear incomprehensible and unphysiological.
+
+At any rate it is evident that the absence of diplopia in squint can
+easily be understood, without adopting the arbitrary idea of a constant,
+habitual suppression of the image of the squinting eye.
+
+
+
+
+VISUAL ACUTENESS OF THE SQUINTING EYE.
+
+
+Whether the state of refraction or the condition of the muscular
+equilibrium is held to be the chief cause of squint, defective vision of
+one eye will always have to be acknowledged as one of the most important
+favouring circumstances; in order to cure squint it is important to have
+regard to the visual acuity of both eyes, and not only to the defective
+condition. But this is no easy matter.
+
+First it is to be observed, that most cases arise at an age when an
+objective determination of refraction is possible, but when the visual
+acuteness cannot be determined. Even in children who have received
+slight instruction, it is frequently difficult to distinguish whether
+imperfect knowledge of the letters or faulty visual acuteness is the
+cause of the non-recognition of the test-letters; when testing the
+vision of children it is often better to use figures than letters.
+
+Further, in these cases it is much to be desired that the habit of
+determining the refraction and visual acuteness at the same time should
+be discontinued, particularly in reduced visual acuteness, as the
+test-tables only contain a few letters, which have to be recognised at a
+distance of 5 to 6 metres. If they have once been read with one eye it
+may easily happen that in testing the second eye they are repeated from
+memory, without being clearly recognised; even a child soon learns the
+few letters by heart. Therefore, when it has been a case of determining
+the visual acuteness I have always conducted the examination at a
+distance of one metre, as the choice of letters or figures which can be
+employed at this distance is much larger than for greater distances. In
+every case the reading of test-letters must be used as an additional
+means of examination. We must never forget that the test of vision is a
+perfectly subjective examination, and that we are obliged first of all
+to accept the statements of patients as they are given without knowing
+what they are worth. I have met with patients in the most highly
+educated classes of society who, in intra-ocular troubles, for example,
+haemorrhage of the retinal artery in the macula lutea, could not
+distinguish the largest type in the first examination, and the next day
+(perhaps with slight difficulty) could read small print.
+
+Such inaccuracies may continue to exist during repeated examinations and
+for long periods. One of my patients, for instance, who first came under
+treatment in the year 1873, had extreme myopia in the left eye with good
+visual acuity; with the right eye, which was also myopic, and had
+suffered for several years from choroiditis of the macula lutea he could
+read only No. 20 Snellen, and a year later 7-1/2 was read with
+difficulty, word by word. Choroiditis of the macula lutea gradually
+developed in the left eye, and in the same proportion the statements as
+to visual acuteness of the right eye improved, so that finally at the
+end of 1881, 0.5 was read with difficulty with this eye, while the left
+still sufficed to read 0.4 (at about 5 cm.). As I tried to comfort the
+patient, who was very anxious about his left eye, with the fact that the
+right eye had considerably improved in the course of the year, he
+replied that he might previously have seen just as well with the right
+eye if he had only taken the trouble, this was certainly my own opinion.
+
+The attention and intelligence shown by patients during examination
+materially influences its results, and one should never hold the first
+trial of vision to be conclusive. We must always remember, however, that
+all conclusions drawn from visual acuteness become more unreliable in
+proportion as the latter is slight. We must attend to some peculiar
+difficulties in testing the vision of those who squint or we shall be
+liable to make great mistakes. When testing the squinting eye,
+particularly in children, it is not sufficient merely to cover the other
+or to hold the hand over it, for they know how to bring the usual eye
+into fixation by holding the head on one side or peeping between the
+fingers; we must keep it carefully closed with a bandage.
+
+It is still more frequently the case that visual acuteness is stated to
+be less than it is in reality. The result of always using the better eye
+for fixation is, that fixation is not learnt with the weaker one. Even
+where there is no squint we see very frequently that in one-sided
+hypermetropia the accommodation is only used in that proportion which
+has become habitual to the emmetropic eye and does not therefore suffice
+to produce clear retinal images, while good visual acuteness is obtained
+by means of the correcting convex glasses. In the case of squinters
+(even without difference of refraction) it happens very frequently that
+the first statements as to the visual power are considerably below the
+truth. Patients who assert that they can only read the largest print
+with difficulty, frequently read smaller, and even the smallest type
+without more trouble, and we must be careful to ascertain this at first.
+Accurate reports are usually obtained more quickly by means of convex
+glasses or eserine. In any case insufficient accommodation is, according
+to this, one of the difficulties, but not the only one, which has to be
+overcome before the squinting eye can be put into fixation. We can
+understand that the innervation necessary for distinct vision can be set
+aside even without loss of visual acuteness, just as we see the movement
+of convergence disappear without the interni losing their capacity for
+contraction.
+
+In order to explain the relation between squint and defective vision,
+we must first consider the question hitherto neglected, or what is
+worse, answered with preconceived opinion, as to whether the same form
+of defective sight which is so common in squint also occurs without
+squint. No one doubts the existence of congenital amblyopia,
+nevertheless it has received but little attention in the handbooks on
+ophthalmology. Leber, for instance (in the well-known compilation, vol.
+v), does not mention it at all.
+
+A more or less considerable reduction of visual acuteness, with good
+field of vision, normal sense of colour and normal ophthalmoscopic
+condition, are characteristic of congenital amblyopia. Colour-blindness
+may of course be present at the same time. I also hold as probable the
+very rare occurrence of congenital defects of the visual field in good
+central vision, but I will reserve for the present the few observations
+I possess on the subject.
+
+Together with congenital defective vision we must consider the
+depreciation in visual acuteness usually present in nystagmus, although
+it might be asserted that it can neither be the cause nor the result of
+the nystagmus, for we find very considerable degrees of congenital
+defective sight in both eyes without nystagmus, as well as nystagmus
+with remarkably good visual acuteness. Not to complicate the question,
+however, I have excluded all cases of nystagmus from the following
+investigation. All cases of myopia of higher degree (_i. e._ of more
+than 6 D.) have also been excluded, as in such cases for various
+well-known reasons the full visual acuteness is never present. In the
+case of individual patients who remained for years under my observation
+I have been able to convince myself that visual acuteness decreased in
+accordance with the increase of myopia; on the other hand, however, it
+appeared to me very probable that just those cases of myopia, which from
+the beginning do not possess full visual acuteness, have a special
+tendency to increase quickly.
+
+For instance, if the examination of a hypermetropic eye, whose defect
+can be exactly determined by means of the ophthalmoscope, shows very
+faulty visual acuteness which is but slightly or not at all improved on
+correction of the hypermetropia, it is clear that the cause of defective
+sight is not to be sought in the hypermetropia. It is just the same with
+astigmatism. In defective vision with astigmatism proved by means of the
+ophthalmoscope, how frequently it is the case that not even the
+slightest improvement can be obtained with cylindrical glasses. This is
+usually attributed to the presence of an irregular astigmatism situated
+near the asymmetric meridian. If we illuminate the eye by means of a
+plane mirror, and observe one spot on the pupillary area which looks
+sometimes bright, sometimes dark, during slight rotations of the glass,
+this appearance can only be caused by the above-mentioned irregularity
+of the refraction of light, and it will be easy to determine whether the
+same takes place in the cornea or in the lens. But if this appearance is
+not present then irregular astigmatism cannot be proved. It is purely
+intentional, or a play upon words, if we refer an existing defective
+sight to an optic cause which cannot be proved. For instance, if
+haziness of the cornea exists, it is not difficult to learn to estimate
+by practical experience whether the amount of visual disturbance
+corresponds to the optic irregularities caused by the opacities and
+irregular refraction of the cornea. Slightly nebulous corneae with
+disproportionately bad vision were therefore included in the following
+statistics; however, they do not influence the result as there are only
+ten cases in all. On the other hand, considerable opacity of the corneae
+or cases which were complicated with anterior synechia, &c., were
+excluded from the statistics.
+
+If then we find defective vision, the development of which has not been
+noticed by the patient, together with normal ophthalmoscopic condition
+and full visual field, and if it is further seen that the condition
+remains unchanged for years, we have every reason for considering the
+defective sight to be congenital. The statements of patients must of
+course be received with caution. If congenital amblyopia of moderate
+degree exists in both eyes, patients do not usually know that it is
+possible for anyone to see better; if the congenital defect is one
+sided, it is generally only casually noticed on closing the better eye.
+We can scarcely doubt that it is a case of congenital amblyopia if it
+happens in children. Acquired defective sight without ophthalmoscopic
+cause seldom occurs among children. I have seen a few cases as a result
+of severe cerebral disease (hydrocephalus, for example); so-called
+anaesthesia retinae, or amblyopia marked by contraction of the visual
+field is not quite so rare. It is easy to avoid confounding both these
+cases with congenital amblyopia.
+
+One must be more careful about drawing conclusions with regard to
+adults, for on the one hand it happens that gradually developed
+monocular visual disturbances are only accidentally observed by patients
+after they have reached a high degree, and it is very difficult then to
+persuade these attentive observers that it is not a case of sudden
+blindness of one eye. (Only a few people seem to be really aware that
+they have two eyes, and still fewer appear to suspect the existence of a
+visual field.)
+
+In all these cases opportunity is hardly given for mistakes with
+reference to the diagnosis of congenital amblyopia, as slowly developed
+monocular defect scarcely occurs without ophthalmoscopic cause. On the
+other hand, ophthalmoscopic symptoms (such as haemorrhage of the retinal
+artery in the macula lutea) may disappear without leaving a trace, while
+defective vision remains. The law of habit, however, usually helps us
+here. In congenital monocular defect patients are generally accustomed
+to this condition, and only notice it when special claim is made on the
+visual faculty of this eye,--he, on the other hand, who is accustomed
+to see with two equally good eyes, may not observe a gradually occurring
+blindness of one eye, if his talent of observation be faulty, but I have
+never had reason to suppose that a rapid depreciation of the central
+visual acuteness of one eye is also overlooked. Rapidly occurring
+monocular visual disturbances are noticed, whether detected with or
+without the ophthalmoscope.
+
+Two peculiarities appear in isolated cases of congenital amblyopia,
+which may render the testing of vision difficult: rapid fatigue of the
+retina, and depreciation of the central visual acuteness in such a way,
+that an adjoining part of the retina possesses a better visual faculty
+than the centre.
+
+Rapid fatigue of the retina occurs in comparatively good visual
+acuteness. For example:
+
+CASE 16.--Mr. W--, aet. 35, came under treatment for conjunctivitis. In
+testing the vision, emmetropia (or doubtful hypermetropia) was found on
+the left, V. = 5/6. Refraction of right eye similar to that of left, V.
+= 5/18 to 5/12, but with rapidly occurring fatigue of the retina.
+Patient had observed this fifteen years before, when shooting during his
+period of army service. Position and movements of the eyes are normal.
+
+This peculiarity occurs more often in higher degrees of defective
+vision. For example:
+
+CASE 17.--Mrs. von G--, aet. 60, has always seen badly with the left eye.
+On the right H. 1.25 D., V. 5/12. On the left with + 2 D., V. 1/12 with
++ 5 D. words of No. 1.75 were recognised; but the visual acuteness above
+stated is only present at the first moment; after a few seconds
+everything disappears in a fog. The left eye has a slightly conical
+nebulous cornea, detected only on focal illumination, which does not,
+however, cause the slightest irregular astigmatism, and cannot,
+therefore, serve as explanation of the defective sight.
+
+This rapid fatigue, which only permits the visual acuity present to be
+estimated for a short period at a time, may easily result in the visual
+acuity being supposed to be worse than it is.
+
+The other phenomenon above mentioned, which occurs in defective vision
+without being actually a necessary symptom, is the depreciation of the
+central visual acuity, which we designate as central scotoma in acquired
+amblyopia. It should be remembered that the visual acuteness which we
+determine under these conditions is something different from what we are
+usually accustomed to designate by this idea. When we simply talk of
+visual acuity we always imply the central visual acuity; however, in
+cases where the centre of the retina is so injured in its function, that
+the peripheral parts lying near are too often called into requisition,
+we do not determine the central visual acuity at all, but that of the
+nearest and at the same time best, excentric part. We cannot prevent
+patients from using that part of the retina which seems best to them for
+recognising the test objects. In such cases (just as in acquired central
+scotoma) continuous print is read badly, and with more trouble than one
+would expect from the visual acuteness which is specified in the
+recognition of single letters. Of course spelling and reading are two
+different things; the excentric visual acuity may perfectly suffice for
+the recognition of single letters, central and also excentric visual
+acuity is necessary for reading. There are patients who, despite full
+visual acuteness, are unable to read continuously, as soon as a defect
+in the right half of the visual field extends close to the fixation
+point. To read fluently, the excentric vision must work on in advance
+for the width of several letters, but if the first letter is seen
+excentrically, the excentric visual acuteness rapidly sinking in a
+physiological way, does not suffice for the following ones.
+
+When testing the vision these circumstances should be carefully
+regarded. The apparent contradiction between the visual acuteness
+specified with test-letters, and the uncertainty in reading continuous
+print, may be taken for simulation (I have seen some sad examples of
+this in acquired central scotoma), and, on the other hand, if in the
+form of defective vision now under discussion we content ourselves by
+merely employing reading tests, we take the visual acuteness to be worse
+than it is, or than we find it later when single test-letters are used,
+for even though excentric, it is yet always visual acuteness. The
+excentricity of that part of the retina put into fixation is usually so
+slight, that the oblique direction of the visual axis cannot be seen
+with the naked eye; if considerable and extensive defect of the centre
+of the retina is present, either varying fixation occurs, sometimes
+parts lying to the nasal and sometimes to the temporal side are put into
+fixation; or excentric fixation exists; an inner retinal area but
+sometimes also a temporal then usually has comparatively the best visual
+acuteness.
+
+A third peculiarity which sometimes occurs in extreme degrees of
+congenital amblyopia, is monocular nystagmus of the weak eye. This
+trembling may be so slight that it is only observable during
+investigation with the ophthalmoscope; in other cases it is most marked
+as soon as the weak eye is put into fixation by exclusion of the sound
+one.
+
+Cases of congenital amblyopia in both eyes, where no explanatory cause
+can be traced, and no nystagmus is present, are rare, but all the more
+interesting. For instance:
+
+CASE 18.--Mr. F--, aet. 56, has seen badly from childhood; the visual
+acuteness of each eye singly examined amounts to 1/18 to 1/12, binocular
+1/12. No. 0.75 is read with difficulty at 8 cm. Ophthalmoscopic
+condition is normal. In mydriasis by atropine hypermetropia of 3 to 4
+dioptres results. With convex 3. 5 D. on the right V. 1/18 to 1/12, on
+the left V. 1/12, binocular V. 1/12 to 1/9, with convex 6 D. still only
+0.75 can be read, but more fluently than with the naked eyes.
+
+Normal binocular fusion may continue to exist even in extreme degrees of
+monocular weak sight; I have observed it up to a visual acuteness of
+1/24. The stereoscope is well adapted to prove binocular fusion in these
+cases; only we must then take care that sufficiently large letters are
+present in the visual field of the defective eye, so that they may
+easily be recognised with the existing visual acuteness. Binocular
+fusion is naturally rendered still more difficult if the weak-sighted
+eye is at the same time hypermetropic to a high degree, as it then
+receives simultaneously indistinct retinal images on account of the
+difference of refraction; and yet in the above table there are 117 cases
+with hypermetropia of at least 2 D. in the better eye, and faulty visual
+acuteness in the other, 7 with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V.
+1/12, and 9 with less than 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+
+In the highest degrees of congenital defective vision, binocular fusion
+cannot as a rule be proved; partly because the methods of investigation
+by which we are able to prove binocular fusion presuppose the existence
+of a sufficient visual acuteness. On the other hand, it cannot be
+expected that normal binocular vision can be learnt with such a large
+amount of monocular defective vision. If the relative strength of the
+muscles is normal, so also are the position and movements of the eyes,
+if elastic preponderance on the part of the muscles is present, which in
+monocular defective vision of considerable degree is no longer governed
+by binocular fusion, and this is frequently the case, squint is
+developed.
+
+Sometimes other congenital anomalies are present at the same time with
+congenital defective vision (for example, congenital dermoid growths on
+the edge of the cornea), and undoubtedly hereditary influences play a
+considerable role therein.
+
+In order to determine the relation of congenital defective vision
+without squint, to defective vision with squint, I have taken those
+cases where congenital defective vision without squint was observed,
+together with the cases of squint, from the diaries of my private
+practice for the last ten years. I have personally investigated every
+case, and the observations on each were carefully examined before being
+included in the statistics; all cases with myopia of six or more
+dioptres, all cases of double nystagmus, and, finally, all those cases
+where the previous existence of squint might be suspected, were
+excluded, as above stated. I must also remark that before the last ten
+years I had not begun to collect these cases. In order to find monocular
+congenital defective vision one must seek for it, as patients usually
+come under treatment for quite different disorders, and in the
+consulting-room there is not always time carefully to investigate what
+possesses interest for us but none for the patient. In cases of squint
+the opportunity for investigating the power of vision does not escape us
+so easily, and yet the same list, which contains among 629 patients 177
+cases of squint with a visual acuteness of 1/8 to less than 1/36,
+furnished at the same time 98 cases with undoubted congenital defective
+vision of the same high degree without squint, which I place together in
+the following review.
+
+Cases of congenital amblyopia with visual acuteness of 1/7 are so
+frequent, that I have not drawn up special statistics of them. I was not
+anxious to collect a large number of cases but only material for
+evidence. I have therefore divided the 98 cases I observed into 3
+groups. (1) Cases with visual acuteness of less than 1/7 to V. 1/12; (2)
+V. less than 1/12 to V. 1/36; (3) visual acuteness less than 1/36. The
+limits between these groups are of course not very sharply defined, for
+what is designated as "measurement" of visual acuteness contains, even
+if we accept the statements of patients as trustworthy, not an
+inconsiderable number of sources of error; and we often find a
+remarkable absence of conformity in the analysed causes of congenital
+amblyopia, according as we seek to determine the visual acuteness by
+means of single test-letters or by reading printed matter. In a case of
+visual acuteness of 1/12 No. 0.75 with convex 6 was the smallest type
+that could be read, and that with difficulty, larger type was usually
+required; and in one case where at first only single words of No. 2.25
+were read with difficulty--this test was on that account repeated in
+myosis by eserine--No. 1.75 was finally the smallest print which could
+with the same difficulty be deciphered. In the division of the groups
+here arranged the best visual acuteness ascertained in the various
+examinations was always used as the basis.
+
+A. Vision less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 38 cases. The examination of the
+better eye showed:
+
+
+ (_a_) Emmetropia in 18 cases. A determination of refraction,
+ mostly ophthalmoscopic, of the weaker eye is submitted in 11
+ cases, which divide themselves into, 4 with emmetropia, 3
+ with hypermetropia (of H. 2 D. and 2.25 D.), 3 with
+ hypermetropic astigmatism, I with myopic astigmatism.
+
+ (_b_) Myopia in 5 cases (3 of M. 1 D. to 1.5 D., 2 of M. 4.5
+ D. and 4 D.), the condition of the defective eye was
+ determined in 3 cases, and was twice hypermetropic, once
+ astigmatic.
+
+ (_c_) Hypermetropia in 8 cases, hypermetropic astigmatism in
+ 3. In 4 cases an exact determination of refraction even of
+ the better eye was for some reason impracticable.
+
+There are 4 cases in this group where the visual acuteness in both eyes
+did not exceed the above-stated small amount, and one which was
+interesting from another point of view.
+
+CASE 19.--Max L--, aet. 8-1/2, recognises No. 24, and a few letters of 18
+at 5 metres with the better eye with convex 6 D.; at 1 metre V. 1/4 to
+1/3, the left eye recognises only No. 60 at 5 m. with + 6 D. at 1 m. No.
+0.75 is read with difficulty. If we exclude one eye it lapses into now
+less, now greater convergence, and still no squint is present, but
+diplopia as well as binocular fusion can be proved by the aid of prisms.
+The theory of Donders that squint is less frequent in hypermetropia of
+high degree because too strong convergence would not suffice to furnish
+clear retinal images, is scarcely tenable in the face of such cases. If
+indistinct retinal images are added to a visual acuteness of only 1/3 to
+1/4 still, even with faulty accommodation, it is difficult to believe
+how a child could learn to read if it did not hold the book close to its
+eyes, which was not the case here, and indeed seldom happens. Therefore,
+in spite of defective vision the accommodation must have sufficed,
+without sacrificing binocular fusion, whilst in all probability
+accommodative convergence followed on exclusion of one eye.
+
+B. 48 cases had visual acuteness from 1/12 to 1/36. The better eye was--
+
+ (_a_) Emmetropic in 16 cases; in 6 of them the refraction of
+ the defective eye was determined, which showed in one case
+ emmetropia, 3 hypermetropia, 2 astigmatism.
+
+ (_b_) Myopia of the better eye was present in 7 cases (in 3
+ myopia of 1 D., in 4 M. 3 D. to 6 D.).
+
+ (_c_) Hypermetropia in 18, astigmatism in 4 cases. In 3
+ cases the condition of the better eye was, for some reason
+ or other, indeterminable.
+
+In this group I should like to point out the following cases as worthy
+of attention:
+
+CASE 20.--Margarethe T--, aet. 16, has hypermetropia 2 D. in the right
+eye, V. 5/6, in the left the ophthalmoscope shows with an otherwise
+normal condition a higher degree of hypermetropia, with + 6.5 D., V.
+1/18, with + 10 D. No. 3.0 is read. No spectacles have been used until
+now; for the past few years school tasks have been performed with a
+certain effort, only during the last year the asthenopia has increased.
+Squint is not present, and with prisms as well as with the stereoscope
+(by the use of objects, whose size corresponds to the defective sight on
+the left side) binocular fusion can be proved.
+
+The case is the same as regards divergent strabismus.
+
+CASE 21.--Mr. H--, aet. 28, has myopia 6 D., V. 6/9 in the right eye; the
+left eye has always been weak sighted, emmetropia is detected with the
+ophthalmoscope, with normal fundus, V. 1/18. No squint, binocular fusion
+can be proved with prisms.
+
+CASE 22.--Mr. B--, aet. 47, has hypermetropia 5 D., V. 5/9 in the right
+eye. Left eye with + 5 D., V. 1/18 (a few letters of 12 also were
+recognised at 1 m.). It seems, however, that the patient is not able
+exactly to indicate the position of the retinal images of his left eye,
+he does not know, as he expresses himself, "whether the letters stand
+here or there." Patient observed the defective sight long ago; the
+ophthalmoscopic condition is normal. Patient really comes on account of
+his son, aged 7-1/2, in whom hypermetropia of 3.5 dioptres is detected
+with the ophthalmoscope, right eye with + 3.5 V. 5/9. Left eye has
+convergent squint, V. 1/36, No. 3.0 is read with + 6.5 D.
+
+The hereditary tendency is seen also in the following case:
+
+CASE 23.--Mrs. S--, aet. about 46, on the left H. 4 D., V. 5/18 to 5/12,
+has used no spectacles until now, and reads No. 0.75 without glasses at
+about 15 cm. R. with + 4 D., V. 1/18, with + 6.5 D. large letters of No.
+5.0 are recognised.
+
+Two sons, present at the same time, are hypermetropic. One has in either
+eye V. 1/4, the other a slighter degree of congenital amblyopia.
+
+CASE 24.--Johanna L--, aet. 4, came under treatment for a congenital
+fibroma covered with hair, about the size of a cherry-stone, situated on
+the outer corneal margin of the left eye, which was removed. Three years
+later, when the child had learnt to read, emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness was observed in the right eye, with the left No. 4.0 only is
+read with difficulty. The ophthalmoscope shows a slight degree of
+irregular astigmatism of the cornea, which in no way explains the
+defective vision; the image of the fundus is perfectly clear and quite
+normal.
+
+CASE 25 afforded me a not altogether pleasant surprise. Martin M--, aet.
+58, has matured cataract in the right eye, with perfectly satisfactory
+light reflex, proper projection, &c. On the left progressive cloudiness
+of the lens has begun. The course of operation and cure were regular in
+every respect, but the power of vision finally was so small that with a
+clear pupillary area, and otherwise normal condition, only single words
+of No. 3.0 were recognised with difficulty at 10 to 15 cm. with convex
+20 D. For the first time the patient remembers that he noticed the
+defective sight in his right eye at the age of sixteen, and was for this
+exempt from army service. The operation performed later on the left eye
+procured satisfactory vision.
+
+
+C. Visual acuteness of less than 1/36 12 cases.
+
+Determination of refraction of the better eye is given in 6 cases, and
+showed twice emmetropia, twice slight myopia, twice hypermetropia. I
+only possess an exact ophthalmoscopic determination of the condition of
+the defective-sighted eye in one instance with H. 2.5 D.
+
+This group is of special interest in that it represents the extreme
+degrees of congenital amblyopia, and, on the other hand, because it
+contains 5 cases of children under 10 years of age.
+
+CASE 26.--Constanze von M--, aet. 9-1/2. Defective vision on the left
+side had been noticed long before by the child's parents. On May 1,
+1879, emmetropia was observed in right eye, V. 5/12 to 5/9. No. 0.4 is
+read at 15 cm. On the left, only movements of the hand are seen, fingers
+cannot be counted even when close to the eye; the visual field is good,
+that is, on moving the hand in the periphery of the visual field the
+child sees "something" without being able to state what it is. Reaction
+of the pupils as rapid and equal as usual. The ophthalmoscopic condition
+(even with dilated pupils) is perfectly normal. All tests for simulation
+were of course applied.
+
+On account of the importance of the case, I suggested another
+examination a year and a half later, on the 22nd December, 1880, which
+showed precisely the same result as the former one--optic disc, macula
+lutea, &c., perfectly normal, the ophthalmoscopic determination of the
+refraction shows H. 2.5 D.
+
+The child's father also possesses in the left eye a slight degree of
+congenital defective sight, observed for many years, with normal
+ophthalmoscopic condition; No. 0.5 is read with + 6.5 D. at 10 cm.
+
+CASE 27.--Tina S--, aet. 6. The defective sight of the left eye had been
+remarked some months previously; report on July 16th, 1878: R. full
+visual acuteness, L. movements of the hand are scarcely visible. The
+child cannot count fingers. Normal ophthalmoscopic condition. Eserine
+and separate use were prescribed. On September 9th, 1878, fingers were
+counted with the left eye at 1.5 m., single words of No. 4.0 were
+recognised, No. 3.5 with convex 6.5 D., but always with oscillating
+fixation. The improvement in the child's statements may be referred to
+the fact that she had meanwhile learnt to form right conclusions from
+the very imperfect sensual impressions of her left eye.
+
+CASE 28.--Frank J--, aet. 10. Left eye. V. 10/50 to 10/40, No. 1-1/2
+Snellen is read at 4 inches. On the right, nystagmus on fixation,
+fingers are counted at 5-6 feet. The ophthalmoscopic condition is
+normal. A sister of the boy squints.
+
+CASE 29.--Ernest G--, aet. 8, has slight nebulae on both corneae. On the
+left V. 15/40. On the right, fingers are counted at 4 inches with visual
+axis deviating inwards.
+
+CASE 30.--I operated on Moritz L-- for congenital cataract before he was
+a year old in 1869 by means of a needle operation. In June, 1877, a thin
+ophthalmoscopically transparent secondary cataract appeared in both
+eyes; on the left, with convex 12 D. V. 3/24 to 3/18, with convex 16 D.
+No. 0.4 is read at 10 cm. On the right, with convex 12 D., fingers are
+counted with difficulty at about 1 m., with inward deviation of visual
+axis.
+
+CASE 31 is also worthy of note. Carl H--, aet. 22, shows quite a number
+of congenital anomalies on the left side of the face, harelip, deformed
+nostril and a skin defect on the inner corner of the eyelid. There is a
+congenital dermoid growth of the size of half a pea situated on the
+inner lower corneal margin. A slight irregularity in the curve of the
+cornea near the dermoid is detected with the ophthalmoscope; the fundus
+of the eye is perfectly normal. Fingers are not counted further off than
+a metre with visual axis deviating inwards. The right eye is emmetropic
+(perhaps slightly hypermetropic), and has full visual acuteness. There
+is no squint.
+
+It is customary to "explain" these cases of monocular amblyopia by
+previously existing squint, and one is quite satisfied if by the
+examination of patients it is only possible to prove that they have
+occasionally squinted, although the advocates of the amblyopia ex
+anopsia disallow the presence of the same under these conditions, that
+is, in periodic squint. Of course a theory which cannot exist without
+the assertion that occasional alternation suffices to hinder the
+development of defective vision caused by disuse, cannot possibly hold
+periodic squint to be the cause of it. Certainly permanent squint may
+also disappear, but this much I have been able to determine, that this
+seldom happens before the twelfth year of life, and one may surely
+reckon that children in whom permanent squint is developed at the usual
+early period of life, still squint at the age of ten years. Cases 24 and
+26 to 30 can under no circumstances be explained by previous squint,
+notwithstanding that they represent the extremest degrees of amblyopia,
+but the question is undoubtedly that of congenital defective vision;
+moreover I have excluded from the statistics of congenital amblyopia all
+cases in which the previous presence of squint could even be supposed.
+
+A table of the cases above described with reference to the defective
+condition is interesting; when a determination of refraction existed for
+the weak eye I have given it, and when this was not the case I have
+stated that of the better eye, thus it is seen that among 85 cases in
+which the refraction was determined, hypermetropia (including
+hypermetropic astigmatism) was present in 39. Hypermetropia was found
+then in 47 per cent of all the cases. The percentage would probably be
+higher, if all weak-sighted eyes had been examined from the beginning as
+to their state of refraction, but as I only learnt to know the relation
+between hypermetropia and the higher degrees of congenital amblyopia
+from my statistics, I did not take notice of this relation when
+investigating individual cases.
+
+How does congenital amblyopia now stand in relation to that disturbance
+of vision which we observe in squint? I see no difference; whether
+squint is present or not, the form of defective vision is precisely the
+same, and nothing happens in the combination with squint which could not
+also be proved without it. The relation to hypermetropia, which is
+proved with congenital amblyopia, also appears in squint.
+
+A collective table of cases of convergent and divergent squint included
+in the statistics (pp. 19 and 47) shows:
+
+ (_a_) In myopia, emmetropia, and doubtful hypermetropia,
+ with convergent and divergent squint together
+ 329 cases. Among them:
+ Visual acuteness to 1/7 239
+ " less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 19
+ " " 1/12 to V. 1/36 46
+ " " 1/36 25
+ Defective sight of higher degree than 1/7, 27.3 per
+ cent.
+
+ (_b_) In hypermetropia 1 to 3 D., including the few cases
+ of hypermetropia with divergent squint, 177 cases.
+ Among them:
+ Visual acuteness to 1/7 121
+ " less than 1/7 to V. 1/12 17
+ " " 1/12 to V. 1/36 27
+ " " 1/36 12
+ Defective sight then, 31.6 per cent.
+
+ (_c_) In hypermetropia 3 D. and more, 70 cases with convergent
+ squint, with:
+ Vision to 1/7 39
+ V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12 8
+ V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36 14
+ V. < 1/36 9
+ Defective sight then, 44.2 per cent.
+
+This regular increase of defective sight with the increase of the
+hypermetropia can be no mere accident, and speaks strongly for the
+identity of defective vision in squint with congenital amblyopia. Were
+defective vision caused by the squint the various states of refraction
+would show no difference in the percentage of defective vision.
+
+Further, the circumstance is worthy of remark that among 198 cases of
+periodic squint (convergent and divergent) which are applicable for the
+statistics of visual acuteness--
+
+ 170 possess V. to 1/7.
+ 16 " V. < 1/7 to V. 1/12.
+ 9 " V. < 1/12 to V. 1/36.
+ 3 " V. < 1/36.
+ 14.2 per cent. then of defective vision of considerable degree.
+
+That defective sight on the whole plays an influential part as a cause
+of squint is doubted by no one, indeed we see blind eyes lapse into
+squint as soon as the conditions necessary to it are supplied by the
+muscles. Of all the prevailing causes present defective vision will be
+the more decisive in proportion as it is of high degree; for the motive
+which despite the presence of favouring circumstances can prevent the
+real occurrence of squint, binocular vision, becomes less efficacious as
+the defective vision becomes more considerable. As binocular fusion
+takes place frequently in periodic squint, for a time at least, that is
+as long as proper fixation lasts, one can understand that periodic
+squint exists chiefly in cases where the visual faculty of both eyes is
+good. Even the highest degrees of congenital amblyopia are not excluded,
+for periodic squint appears where the faculty of binocular fusion has
+been completely lost. Further, that considerable congenital defective
+sight is more frequent with than without squint, may be accounted for
+quite simply by the fact that, in extreme degrees of it, binocular
+fusion cannot be learnt at all, while in the lesser degrees it is more
+easily forgotten again.
+
+If defective vision is undoubtedly one of the causes of squint, we must
+seek for the grounds upon which it has been taken to be a consequence of
+squint, and described as amblyopia ex anopsia. I will not inquire to
+whom the honour of this invention belongs. I do not want to write a
+history of mistakes but only to examine the basis of the views now
+current. The most complete record of the same may be found in the
+well-known journal on the 'Cure of Eye Diseases,' vol. v, p. 1011.
+Leber, who does not seem to recognise the existence of congenital
+amblyopia, has shown quite a special predilection for amblyopia ex
+anopsia.
+
+Amblyopia from want of use, which formerly included all possible
+disturbances to vision, great and small, is now only accepted in two
+cases, for squint and congenital cataract, if the latter is not operated
+on very early in the first or second year of life.
+
+The fact is simply this, that in congenital cataract even the most
+successful operation is frequently deceiving as to its issue without
+ophthalmoscopic report; this is the more disagreeable as the most exact
+reflection test before the operation fails to prove the existence of
+this defective sight. But does it follow from this, that congenital
+cataract has induced defective sight from want of use? We find the same
+defective vision also in congenital defective development of the
+transparent lenses (so-called luxation of the lens). On the whole, we
+often find several congenital defects in the same individual. The very
+circumstance that the cataract is congenital makes it probable that the
+defective sight is so also, or are we to take congenital cataract as
+being a guarantee against congenital amblyopia?
+
+Von Graefe, who first considered this defective sight to be congenital,
+designated it in his later lectures as originating from want of use,
+probably in order to advise the earliest possible performance of an
+operation. There is no mention of his having brought forward evidence
+for this assertion; that the great master himself said it was enough,
+and the host of believers felt themselves to be the happy possessors of
+a new dogma.
+
+A number of children appeared in my practice, in whom congenital
+cataract was needled by von Graefe in the first or second year of life
+with recovery of transparent media, who showed, however, the extremest
+degrees of defective vision when they were sufficiently intelligent to
+have their vision tested. Whoever is interested in this can find a
+number of such cases in the Royal Institution for the Blind at Steglitz,
+which I am accustomed to visit several times a year by request of the
+committee. On p. 91 I have related a case of monocular congenital
+defective sight in congenital cataract of both eyes.
+
+Everywhere then the principle holds good, that whoever makes an
+assertion must be prepared to verify it; amblyopia from non-use is
+denoted as an inherited trouble, and still not a single observation
+exists which furnishes proof that an eye of previously ascertained good
+visual acuteness has become amblyopic in consequence of disuse, a fact I
+drew attention to ten years ago. Leber replies to this, he remembers "to
+have seen patients with complete amblyopia in the squinting eye, who
+stated that its visual faculty had been found to be good during an
+examination instituted years before." Is this intended as an
+observation? By that I mean is it a proof of facts, for the
+trustworthiness of which he holds himself responsible: in the handling
+of scientific questions I do not place the least reliance on the dim
+recollections of unnamed individuals. Even in personally conducted
+examinations we must be on our guard to avoid mistakes, and now we are
+confronted with mere recollections of tests of vision!
+
+By means of the above observations the theory that "the peculiar variety
+of monocular amblyopia which is so frequent in monocular squint is
+hardly observed without squint" is sufficiently disproved.
+
+Leber seeks to enfeeble Alfred Graefe's statement that the presence of
+extremely defective vision may sometimes be proved at a very early age,
+in children who have only squinted a short time (the rapid development
+of amblyopia in consequence of the squint really appears incredible), by
+the assertion "that just at the earliest age, when the activity of the
+optic nerve is not yet sufficiently strengthened by use, the conditions
+for producing amblyopia from non-use are most favorable with complete
+exclusion of one eye," but complete exclusion of the squinting eye does
+not take place even in extremely defective sight, as can easily be seen
+by the mirror test (p. 66) I described fourteen years ago. Which
+activities of the optic nerve apparatus are strengthened then by use?
+Perhaps visual acuteness? The physiological conditions of this are only
+to be sought in the anatomical structure, and the physiological
+arrangements of the retina or the visual organs, which cannot be changed
+much by use. What we can learn from the visual act relates solely to the
+conclusions which we are able to draw from sensual impressions; but
+visual acuteness, _i. e._ the faculty for the recognition of distinct
+points, is an anatomical, physiological gift, and not a thing to be
+acquired.
+
+The opposing observation, that squint, even of monolateral character
+dating from earliest childhood, continued to the middle and later years
+of life, can still exist with very good visual faculty, may easily be
+explained by alternation from time to time. If that is so indeed, if
+squint begins during the presence of good visual acuteness, and nothing
+further is necessary to its maintenance than alternation from time to
+time, why should defective vision from non-use ever be developed? With
+good visual faculty on both sides alternations also occur from time to
+time.
+
+Still more convincing are those cases which are numerous where the
+visual acuteness of the squinting eye only amounts to about 1/7 to 1/12,
+and where, on this account, there is no alternation. Were this defective
+sight acquired through non-use it must of necessity be progressive; it
+must exist in proportion to the duration of the squint. A moderate
+experience will suffice to show that this is not the case. And further,
+defective sight must continue progressive even after removal of the
+squint by operation, for by the operation nothing is changed in the
+relations of the binocular vision present in squint, which are dismissed
+with the one word, "suppression," by the advocates of defective vision
+from non-use.
+
+Moreover, suppression may exist for years without the slightest
+disadvantage to the visual faculty.
+
+CASE 32.--In November, 1873, I operated on Fritz F-- for a slight
+divergent squint of the left eye. Slight hypermetropia was present on
+both sides, and nearly full visual acuteness. In October, 1880,
+perfectly normal position of the eyes showed itself with the same visual
+acuity and emmetropia in both eyes; at the same time, however, the boy
+affirmed that when reading he could never see with his left eye but only
+with the right; in reality only the right visual field was perceived in
+the stereoscope.
+
+The second reason brought forward is, that the variety of amblyopia from
+non-use is quite a peculiar one; "it consists of a functional
+disturbance of those parts of the retina whose images belong to the
+common V. F., and are suppressed in squint in order to render vision
+distinct--the macula and the temporal and only a part of the nasal
+halves of the retina." Does this hold good for all cases of amblyopia in
+squint, or do those cases only belong to amblyopia from non-use where
+excentric fixation takes place with an inward deviating visual axis? It
+would be difficult to draw the line. I have seen a case in which the
+squinting eye possessed a visual acuteness of 5/36 together with
+excentric fixation and nystagmus; however, I attach no value to isolated
+cases. We frequently find excentric fixation with a visual acuteness of
+1/12 to 1/36. Further, those cases cannot possibly be regarded as
+results of squint, which possess unsteady oscillating fixation or
+rapidly trembling nystagmus, which occurs as soon as the squinting eye
+fixes. But this conclusion is false, even for the excentric fixation
+with visual axis deviating inwards; if it were right the angle at which
+the eye deviates inwards on fixation in convergent squint would always
+be greater than the squint angle. Those cases are, of course, more
+remarkable where this is not the case; however, on close investigation
+those cases are more frequent where the angle of deviation is about the
+same size or smaller than the squint angle, and is fixed with a part of
+the retina which undoubtedly belongs to the common visual field.
+
+On p. 91 I have described two cases of excentric fixation in children
+who had never squinted, and it is only necessary to take a little
+trouble to repeat the mirror test which I described, to be convinced
+that squinting eyes have not lost the power "of using those parts of the
+retina," even if they are amblyopic to an extreme degree; without the
+slightest doubt the reflection is perceived as soon as it falls on the
+retina.
+
+Value is attached to the improvement produced by the separate use of the
+squinting eye. According to my experience no higher visual acuity can be
+attained by use of the amblyopic eye, than that which is best detected
+by the aid of eserine in the first examination, if it is only carried
+out thoroughly enough. No doubt if we proceed otherwise, and rest
+content with whatever statements the patient likes to make, without
+giving ourselves any more trouble, we may expect the most superficial
+diagnoses to show the most astonishing therapeutic results, as, indeed,
+often happens. And now, talking of strychnine injections! When two
+celebrated ophthalmologists occupy themselves simultaneously with the
+therapeutics of strychnine, one of whom obtains the most astonishing
+results in atrophic troubles of the optic nerves, but, on the other
+hand, obtains no real improvement in "amblyopia from non-use," while the
+other can show brilliant success in the last-named form of defective
+vision, and, on the other hand, none in atrophy of the optic nerves, we
+may perhaps conclude that both are right, if even really on the negative
+side, and that the circumstances are the same in the tests of vision.
+Again, we must examine more closely some of the cases, in which
+strychnine injections showed a brilliant result. (Anyone interested in
+the original work can read up the 'Vienna Weekly Medical News' for the
+year 1873.)
+
+"1. Wilhelm H--, a strong healthy boy, aet. 12, complains of defective
+vision. Right eye has nothing abnormal in its outward appearance, and
+just as little in the fundus. V. 16/100, H. 2.5 D., Snellen IV-I/II; is
+the smallest type he reads at 3 to 7 inches. With + 10, I-I/II is read
+at 4 to 6 inches. Left eye V. 16/70. H. 2.75 D. II-I smallest type
+legible at 3 to 12 inches. With + 4 D. I-I/II is read at 4 to 6 inches.
+On March 14th, 1872, first injection of strychnine with 0.002 gr. in the
+temples. An hour later V. of right eye 16/70, left unchanged. On March
+23rd, 1872, after one injection daily, V. of each eye is 16/50."
+
+Patient shows then in the right eye visual acuity 16/100, with manifest
+hypermetropia 2.5 D.; in all probability the total hypermetropia really
+present was higher, and was scarcely corrected by means of convex 4 D.
+If the patient now reads No. I-I/II Snellen with + 4 D. at 6 inches,
+this proves a visual acuity of 1/3 during the first investigation before
+the strychnine injection, and shows that the estimate of 16/100 was
+inaccurate. At the close of the treatment, only a visual acuity of 16/50
+(almost exactly 1/3) is specified for distance. The result seems to me,
+then, to be this, that the patient during repeated examinations has
+gradually learned to make more accurate statements, indeed, with a boy
+twelve years old one can scarcely expect it to be otherwise.
+
+"4. Paul A--, aet. 18, was operated on ten years ago for internal squint
+of the right eye, and dismissed with + 2 D. for distance, and + 6.6 D.
+for near use. He now complains of decrease of his visual acuity. The
+eyes are normal externally and internally. Hyperopic formation in a high
+degree. Right eye V. 1/20, with and without convex glasses, without
+glass only VIII-I/II with difficulty, with + 6 V-I/II the smallest. Left
+eye appears emmetropic, but is decidedly hyperopic. V. 5/4. Glasses are
+rejected; I-I/II is read fluently at 6 to 12 inches. After one injection
+the right eye recognises III-I/II with + 6, after the second II-I/II,
+after the eighteenth I-I/II with difficulty. The visual acuity, however,
+remains at 1/20, and is not changed after six months, although latterly
+patient daily practised with + 3 D."
+
+Visual acuity of 1/20 suffices to read III-I/II at 2.5 inches, II-I/II
+at 1.5 inches, and I-I/II at about 1 inch; clear, retinal images are
+then scarcely obtainable, but we know what hypermetropes can do in that
+case; besides this, if the patient is examined for weeks by Snellen's
+method, he may get so far as to realise fairly well "the strange fate of
+that man" of I-I/II, despite larger diffusion circles; in any case
+vision remained at 1/20, despite strychnine and separate use.
+
+In extremely defective vision little importance should be paid to the
+fact of slight diversity in the statements, as where visual acuity
+amounts only to about 1/36, or where fingers are counted at a distance
+of 1 to 2 metres, it is quite immaterial, as far as the usefulness of
+the eyes is concerned, whether fingers are counted at a half or a whole
+metre, and we ought never to forget that all conclusions which we draw
+from the state of the visual acuity, are unreliable in proportion as the
+latter is lowered. Indeed, on repeated examination of such cases we
+frequently find considerable fluctuation in the statements of the
+patients, therefore we ought not to expect accurate statements for very
+inexact sensual impressions.
+
+By separate use, even in extremely defective vision, no improvement in
+visual acuteness is developed, but only a more complete acquirement of
+the power of deducing right conclusions from imperfect sensual
+impressions. That which has been most unscientifically designated as
+"suppression of diffusion circles," depends solely on this method of
+use. As with indistinct retinal images so with facial impressions which
+are insufficient, one can never learn to recognise larger objects
+aright.
+
+We must never forget that vision is a conclusive act acquired by
+practice; whoever sees well with one eye, and is weak sighted with the
+other, acquires this end only for the sensual impressions of the better
+eye, and must first collect experience for the defective eye, before he
+can use it.
+
+Leber has recently joined those cases which are described as blindness
+through blepharospasm, to amblyopia from disuse. First, I wish to
+observe that blepharospasm is not a necessary cause; I have seen the
+same disturbance of vision follow severe double blenorrhoea, which
+destroyed one eye but left the other uninjured. These children are
+always of an age which renders any trial of vision impossible, and we
+are therefore obliged to draw conclusions as to visual power from the
+movements of the body. If children move as though they were blind, it
+need not necessarily follow that they are so in the common meaning of
+the word. The art of vision is a difficult one, the acquisition of which
+begins with the earliest days of life; we do not call every person blind
+who does not see what is before his eyes, because he does not understand
+how to see it. A child who has only imperfectly learnt the conclusive
+act of vision, and forgotten it again during a continued disuse of both
+eyes, will not know how to use perfect visual acuity, and will move like
+a blind person till he again learns to estimate the relations between
+his retinal images and the things of the material world, which happens
+in a very short time.
+
+After this digression let us turn again to amblyopia from disuse, and to
+the last trump which is played for it. "Those cases are very remarkable
+where an immediate improvement occurs after tenotomy in amblyopia of
+high degree, which according to this is certainly produced and
+maintained by the squint." As proof a case is cited by Knapp, who
+describes it in the following words:--"The improvement in visual power
+varied very much. In many cases it was indefinable, in others very
+pronounced; for example, in one case, where it was very great before the
+operation, only No. 16 Jaeger could be read at 1 inch, while after it
+No. 2 was read at 8 to 9 inches."
+
+And we are to believe wonders on the strength of this scanty
+communication! It is an every-day experience that a person who squints,
+who has just asserted his inability to read the largest type,
+immediately afterwards reads smaller and the smallest type, and it would
+at least first have to be determined that all endeavours to produce a
+better visual result before tenotomy were unsuccessful; but as the
+communication stands, the conclusion as to the effect of tenotomy is
+quite a superficial _post hoc ergo propter hoc_. Moreover, I had this
+case in view when I spoke on this matter in the first edition of my
+'Handbook:'--"The frequently repeated assertion that a considerable
+improvement of vision may occur as a direct result of tenotomy, is so
+little in accordance with all the laws of physiology, that inquiries
+must be instituted _ad hoc_, and carried out with the most perfect
+exactitude. Only trials of vision which are carefully carried out and
+repeated several times before the operation, and which have regard to
+visual acuteness for distance as well as for near objects, the latter
+indeed by the aid of convex glasses or Calabar extract, can be
+recognised as proving anything in face of such a perfectly improbable
+assertion. In the course of examinations so instituted I have not myself
+found that tenotomy exercises any direct influence on visual acuity."
+
+I would not have given so much space to this explanation had not a
+principle been in question. The occurrence of amblyopia as a result of
+non-use has been deductively constructed and is not inductively proved
+by observation. It is just an article of faith, and in science we cannot
+rely on such things; we must not depart from the inductive method.
+
+
+
+
+ON THE CURE OF SQUINT.
+
+
+Therapeutic investigations have their safest and most instructive basis
+in observation of the course of a disease as it appears without
+complications, and with no unusual symptoms; we can only arrive at a
+certain decision as to the extent of our therapeutics when we know
+exactly what will happen without skilled assistance. When squint is once
+present it is seldom complicated by fresh symptoms; on the other hand,
+spontaneous cures unquestionably take place. We must certainly not rely
+simply on the statements of patients themselves. On p. 1 we have seen
+what mistakes occur, even when it is a question of whether squint is
+present or not. How little such vague statements are worth is seen by
+the fact, that the question as to the direction of the previous squint
+very seldom finds a satisfactory answer; as a rule it is impossible to
+determine whether periodic or permanent squint has been present.
+
+If we undertake the task of converting the statements of patients as to
+previous squint into observations, in order to confirm the statements
+from the objective material, we must first prove whether the squint
+cannot by some means be still produced (by excluding the eye or by
+raising or lowering the eyes). Thus the condition of binocular vision
+offers us valuable guides. If we find that binocular fusion does not
+exist with available power of vision on both sides, but that the same
+conditions of sight appear in the eyes as we have learnt to attribute to
+squint, there is no reason for doubting the statements about a
+previously existing squint. It is otherwise in those cases of extreme
+amblyopia where normal binocular vision is never expected, or at least
+cannot be proved on account of the enormous difference between the two
+eyes.
+
+If we discover the existence of normal binocular fusion, squint may
+nevertheless have been present at a former time, for in many cases, of
+periodic squint particularly, the habit of binocular fusion is never
+quite lost.
+
+That squint can disappear of itself is unquestionable; how often this
+happens it is difficult to say. The fact that in ophthalmic practice we
+see many more squinting children than adults is best explained by
+this,--that squinting children are brought to us by their parents, while
+adults who still squint have usually given up any desire for a cosmetic
+improvement, and only come under treatment accidentally or on account of
+other ailments; lastly, a considerable number of cases are cured by
+operation. If the squint has disappeared we only discover by accident
+that it was ever present. The fact of its previous existence may usually
+be determined by other signs more positive than mere statements from
+memory; with reference, however, to the age at which the spontaneous
+cure takes place we are left to depend almost entirely on the patient's
+statement. As far as I have been able to determine, the period from the
+ninth or tenth up to the sixteenth year seems to offer the most
+favorable conditions.
+
+We rarely have an opportunity of watching the disappearance of squint,
+still I have observed two cases in which a permanent convergent squint
+disappeared after about a year. In both cases the squint had arisen in
+young people (of eight and nineteen years of age) in the course of
+irido-choroiditis which terminated in blindness, and disappeared with
+the sight. The fixing eye was emmetropic in one case, in the other the
+condition of error could not be determined owing to nebulae of the
+cornea.
+
+We more frequently see periodic squint disappear.
+
+CASE 33.--M--, a boy aet. 10, was first examined by me in April, 1873;
+the right eye has hypermetropia 4.5 D., and almost full visual
+acuteness, the left has convergent squint, and recognises No. 6-1/2
+(Snellen) with convex 10 D.; V. = 1/18 at 1 metre. (The boy's father
+also squints with the left eye, which is amblyopic to a high degree (V.
+= 1/36), right eye has emmetropia, and full visual acuteness). The
+prescribed spectacles (convex, 4.5 D.) were used for working, but not
+continually; still three years later, in 1877, the deviation was
+considerably less and only occurred occasionally. In March, 1880,
+nothing more was seen of the squint, only slight convergence still
+recurred on excluding the left eye. Patient now wears convex 4.5 D.
+constantly.
+
+On account of the importance which the disappearance of squint possesses
+in hypermetropia I will describe a few more cases which belong here.
+
+CASE 34.--Mrs. B--, aet. 32, has on the left H. 1.5 D., V. 5/9; on the
+right H. 1.5 D., V. 5/12, binocular vision (H. =.75 D., V. = 5/6 to
+5/9). Asthenopic troubles are the cause of her present complaint. She
+says she squinted with the right eye as a child till her eighth or ninth
+year; the present position of the eyes is quite normal; ordinary type is
+read at the usual distance with normal fixation without glasses.
+Particularly keen fixation is rarely followed by squint, which may be
+produced by excluding the right eye; the latter then deviates about 5
+mm. inwards and slightly upwards; the secondary deviation of the left
+eye is rather less. Only the left visual field is seen in the
+stereoscope.
+
+CASE 35.--Mrs. W--, aet. 31, has on the right H. 3.5 D., V. 5/9, on the
+left V. = 1/16 with + 4 D., single words of No. 0.8 are read (mother and
+aunt have also congenital weak sight in this eye). Position and movement
+of the eyes are perfectly normal, exclusion of the left eye is followed
+by slight relative divergence. In answer to my question whether she had
+not previously squinted, patient replied that she did not know, it had
+always been a matter of dispute in her family; as, however, only the
+right visual field was seen in the stereoscope, we may be sure that
+squint had been present and that binocular fusion had been lost in
+consequence.
+
+CASE 36.--Mrs. G--, aet. 49, report in March, 1876: On the right H. 3 D.,
+V. 10/10, on the left H. 4 D., V. 10/40; a previously existing squint
+had disappeared of itself; the position of the eyes appears perfectly
+normal, but binocular fusion is not present; with red glass before one
+eye and a prism deviating in a vertical direction before the other,
+patient does not see double, but first with one eye and then with the
+other. The squint as well as its disappearance occurred however, at a
+time when it would have been regarded as an error to allow children to
+use convex glasses.
+
+CASE 37.--Miss H--, governess, aet. about 30, came under treatment for
+asthenopic disorders; on both sides hypermetropia 2.5 D., visual
+acuteness 5/18. She owns to have squinted as a child,--it had often been
+remarked when she was at school. The squint gradually disappeared, but
+still occurred sometimes on keen fixation. The usual position of the
+eyes appears perfectly normal, and gives no suspicion of squint;
+convergence occurs on exclusion, sometimes with downward deviation of
+the right eye. With the aid of a red glass changing fixation is easily
+produced even without prisms, but never diplopia. At first only the left
+visual field was seen with the stereoscope; then the right on exclusion
+of the left eye; never both at the same time. According to this the
+condition of binocular vision speaks entirely for the fact, that squint
+had existed long enough to prevent the development of a normal binocular
+visual act, and the squint had disappeared without the help of convex
+glasses in spite of the hypermetropia.
+
+CASE 38.--Bertha W--, aet. 18, reads with the naked eye on the right No.
+0.75 at 10 cm., on the left only 1.75 at the same distance;
+hypermetropia of 6 D. is detected with the ophthalmoscope, with + 5.5
+the visual acuteness of the right eye amounts at 1 metre to 1/9 (if the
+test-letters had contained No. 8 or 7.5, that would probably have been
+recognised also), on the left with + 5.5 D., V. = 1/12, with + 6 D. No.
+0.8 is read with difficulty. Patient admits to have squinted as a child;
+no squint is present now; binocular fusion can be detected with prisms
+and she only squints now and then on the left side to assist vision,
+with which, patient states without being questioned, diplopia is
+combined. Spectacles have not been used till now.
+
+I could cite several more such cases, but they would prove no more than
+these. At any rate the fact is settled that squint can disappear
+spontaneously, and without the aid of convex glasses even in high
+degrees of hypermetropia.
+
+Wecker's announcement that "this spontaneous cure goes hand in hand with
+the progressive decrease of the accommodation, and depends on the fact
+that the squinter, on the strength of this progressive decrease,
+renounces more and more the aid which he finds in the increased
+convergence during the act of accommodation," only proves to how great
+an extent one may be prejudiced by theories. A limitation of the
+accommodation must necessarily increase the claims which are made on it,
+and can only afford inducement for calling forth all the help possible
+to support the accommodation.
+
+The fact that squint spontaneously disappears after normal binocular
+fusion is completely and permanently lost, and in individuals who
+accommodate without the occurrence of a too strong convergence,
+notwithstanding their hypermetropia and without the help of the
+controlling influence of binocular single vision, seems to me quite
+irreconcilable with Donders' theory. Every motive for the same,
+hypermetropia, difference of refraction, monocular defective vision,
+&c., may not only be present without the occurrence of squint, they do
+not even prevent the spontaneous recurrence of a squint already cured.
+Of course I will not affirm that the causes made so prominent by Donders
+exercise no influence on the origin of squint, but will only emphasize
+the fact, that other causes exist which possess a greater influence, and
+which we can find only in the ocular muscles.
+
+We have no experience as to whether this spontaneous cure occurs in
+myopia with divergent squint. This is not to be wondered at, as
+hypermetropia is present in the great majority of cases of squint, and
+the observations as to spontaneous cure are also rare in these. But I
+can vouch for one case where a slight absolute divergent squint, with
+crossed diplopia, which I treated shortly after its origin in a youthful
+myope, with prismatic spectacles, soon disappeared, and remained
+permanently cured.
+
+The inclination to preponderance of the interni appears to be peculiar
+to youth, while later on circumstances change in favour of the externi,
+and that seems to me the chief ground for the spontaneous cure of
+convergent squint. The cure is not always complete; deviation still
+occurs on exclusion, or on particularly keen fixation; sometimes,
+however, also under conditions which can only be put down to a change in
+the elastic tensions of the muscles. The following is an interesting
+illustration of this:
+
+CASE 39.--Miss S--, aet. 20, states that she squinted frequently as a
+child from her fifth to her tenth year; the squint gradually
+disappeared, but returned again from time to time during the last half
+year without apparent cause. The examination showed normal position of
+the eyes, slight convergence only on exclusion. Visual acuteness on the
+right 5/6, with atropine ophthalmoscopic and functional emmetropia, the
+visual acuteness is lowered to 5/12 by convex 1 D.; on the left
+hypermetropia 7 D., visual acuteness 5/18; the same degree of
+hypermetropia is found with the ophthalmoscope.
+
+Crossed diplopia with a difference in height is distinguished with the
+aid of a red glass, the difference being corrected by a prism of 4 deg.,
+with the base downwards before the right eye; a prism of 4 deg. with the
+base inwards suffices to place the double images immediately above one
+another. Spontaneous diplopia does not take place; only the right visual
+field is seen in the stereoscope. As patient lived in Brandenburg and
+only came to consult me occasionally I never had an opportunity of
+seeing the squint till she decided to stay here for some time. It was
+then seen that a peculiar oscillating deviation of the left eye of about
+4 mm. inwards often occurred. As the previous spontaneous disappearance
+of the squint and the crossed diplopia made one fear that tenotomy of
+the internus might be followed by divergence, instillations were used in
+order to make a more exact measurement of the deviation,--by this means
+the condition was so improved in the course of a few weeks, that
+deviation no longer occurred even on exclusion of the right eye.
+
+The spontaneous cure of squint may, however, be quite complete; indeed I
+have seen one case where convergent squint became divergent.
+
+CASE 40.--A young lady, slightly over twenty years of age, showed on the
+right M. .75 D., V = 10/10, on the left H. 1.5 D., V. 10/40 to 10/30,
+and slight divergent squint on the left side. Crossed diplopia could be
+produced with a red glass, tenotomy of the left abducens sufficed to
+correct it. I had not concealed my doubts as to her statement that she
+had previously squinted inwards, but they were quite dispelled by a
+photograph taken about twelve years before, in which decided right
+convergent squint could not be mistaken. There is something to be said
+for the fact that it may have been a periodic squint, which occurred
+during the taking of the picture, as the photographer would have taken
+pains to hide a permanent squint in some way.
+
+Conscious suppression of squint happens now and then, although very
+rarely.
+
+CASE 41.--Miss A. L--, aet. 27, is stated to have commenced to squint in
+her first year, until at the age of eighteen she took pains to cure the
+habit, and with perfect success as far as regards the position of the
+eyes; the only disagreeable symptom was that she could no longer read
+with the naked eye. Spectacles were therefore prescribed for her, convex
+5 D., but even they did not quite remove the trouble in reading; it was
+now a disagreeable, painful sensation to have recourse to squint in
+order to see more clearly. It was easiest to read with greatly lowered
+field of vision and with the help of a convex eyeglass as well as the
+spectacles. During the examination I found on the right hypermetropia
+5.5 D., visual acuteness 5/12 to 5/9, on the left with + 5.5 D., V =
+1/12. With convex 6 D. No. 0.5 was read at 12 inches from the glass, but
+not nearer, with normal fixation on both sides. The binocular near point
+(if we may employ this expression in the absence of normal binocular
+fusion) was considerably removed without the existence of paresis of the
+accommodation, despite the over-correction of the hypermetropia. It was
+rather a question of the same disposition of the relative amplitude of
+accommodation as I have previously described in a similar case. By
+methodical practice of binocular vision, I had taught an intelligent boy
+to fix binocularly, not only for distance, but also for near objects,
+but here again the relative amplitude for accommodation was diminished,
+so that with correct binocular fixation he could only read with convex
+glasses, which greatly over-corrected the hypermetropia. Finally, the
+normal amplitude of accommodation was restored by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, and when I saw the patient twelve years later I was
+able to satisfy myself that both were perfectly preserved. In the case
+of Miss L--, I believed I ought to give up all thoughts of an operation;
+the position of the eyes could not be improved, convex 5.5 D. eyeglass
+perfectly sufficed for distance, and convex 7 D. spectacles for reading.
+It seemed to me senseless to perform tenotomy merely to enable her to
+use the same glass for distance and for near objects, without any
+possibility of a cosmetic improvement. Moreover the condition of
+binocular vision quite confirmed the statements as to the previous
+squint. Diplopia could only be produced now and then with the help of
+prisms and red glass, at first the right visual field only was seen in
+the stereoscope, on closer observation also the left, but without
+binocular fusion.
+
+Besides, the proved decrease of the relative power of accommodation in
+both these cases, marked by a voluntary suppression of the squint, does
+not appear in those cases where squint disappears of itself, the state
+of the accommodation, therefore, shows nothing unusual.
+
+The spontaneous cure of squint teaches us two important facts, firstly,
+that the conditions of tension of the ocular muscles may change in the
+course of time, and secondly, that normal binocular fusion of the
+retinal images is not necessary for a correct position of the eyes;
+neither the spontaneous nor the operative cure of squint presupposes the
+presence or the restoration of a normal binocular fusion. If this were
+the case the operation for squint would not be of much use.
+
+Observation of these cases further teaches, that treatment with convex
+glasses has prospects of success, particularly in periodic squint with
+hypermetropia, if squint can disappear spontaneously even without
+correction of the hypermetropia. At the same time, however, it appears
+that we need not form hasty conclusions about it. Periodic squint
+frequently arises during the earliest years of life, and everyone
+(perhaps with the exception of a few ophthalmologists) will at once
+reject the idea of allowing children of two to three years old to wear
+spectacles; constant wearing of spectacles even by older children seems
+to me not to be without risk as long as there is any chance of their
+falling when running, playing, &c., in which case the eyes as well as
+the spectacles would be in danger. As a rule I only order children to
+wear convex spectacles when they are distinctly indicated, and then only
+during sedentary occupations, when working and eating. Of course,
+exceptions may be made according to the individuality of the child, and
+the care with which it is looked after at home.
+
+We are more rarely able to remove permanent convergent squint by means
+of convex glasses than the periodic form; that it is possible, however,
+I should like to show by an account of a patient, who offers, besides,
+other interesting peculiarities.
+
+CASE 42.--Marie S--, aet. 6, came under treatment on November 28th, 1878,
+for recent superficial marginal keratitis of the left eye, which was
+treated first with atropine; a few days later slight blepharitis
+appeared also. On December 9th, atropine was discontinued; on the 14th,
+the position of the eyes was still quite normal; on the 19th, permanent
+convergent squint of the left eye was present. Squint had never been
+observed in the child before. Double images were voluntarily announced
+without my having inquired for them, they were homonymous and moved
+further apart at both sides of the visual field. On December 28th, the
+squint still remained the same, the double images were, however,
+scarcely noticed by the child, so quickly do the relations of the
+corresponding points of the retina change even in the sixth year. Both
+eyes were atropinised for the better determination of the error, when a
+slight degree of hypermetropia was shown by the ophthalmoscope, at most
+1.5 D.; certainly a higher degree was specified when the vision was
+tested, namely, on the right H. 2.5 D., V. = 5/12 to 5/9, on the left H.
+1.75 D., V. = 5/18, probably, however, the objective determination was
+more exact than the child's statements. If a child of six knows its
+letters and figures sufficiently well to undergo a visual test, that is
+as much as we can expect; in any case, however, the forms of the
+letters and figures which we use for the visual test are not easy to
+children, and the more objective the way in which the child comprehends
+the examination, the less it perplexes itself by guesses, but only names
+the letters which it really distinctly recognises, the less deficient
+are the reports as to the visual acuteness; the proportionately larger
+retinal images are still recognised, even if they are no longer quite
+distinct, but consist of diffusion circles as a result of
+over-correction of the hypermetropia. That these observations were right
+for the case in point, is seen by the fact that eight days later, after
+the effects of the atropine had passed off, the child could see better
+with the naked eyes than with convex glasses, and that finally, when it
+had become accustomed to the forms of the letters and figures employed,
+V. = 5/9 was announced on the right, and V. = 5/12 on the left.
+
+Mydriasis by atropine had no influence whatever on the squint,
+therefore, on December 31st, convex spectacles 2 D. were prescribed for
+permanent use. On January 4th, the linear deviation still amounted to 4
+mm.; on January 15th, convergence was no longer discernible for
+distance, with red glass double images occurred at once; on January
+21st, no squint was present, and binocular fusion was again restored;
+prisms immediately caused double images, the facultative divergence was
+= 0. I thought it prudent to order the spectacles to be worn till the
+middle of March, when they were discontinued; squint has not appeared
+since then.
+
+In this case it is impossible to determine what really induced the
+squint, certainly not the slight hypermetropia, for the child had
+already learnt to read without squinting, and was spared any exertion at
+the time when the squint arose. Neither can we look for the cause in the
+inflammatory condition for which the child first came under treatment,
+this was as good as removed before the squint began and no exciting
+condition worth naming was present. Moreover, most cases of squint
+arise without directly assignable causes. It seems to me unquestionable
+that the permanent use of convex glasses made the pathological relation
+between accommodation and convergence normal, before it had firmly
+established itself, and before the muscular relations were definitely
+changed, and that the squint was really thus cured. But if the child had
+not been under treatment I should scarcely have seen the squint so soon
+after its first occurrence, and most cases of squint arise at an age
+which forbids the permanent wearing of spectacles.
+
+If permanent squint has already existed for a long time, nothing can be
+hoped for from the use of convex glasses; for the conditions of the
+muscles are then so much changed, that they are no longer influenced by
+such weak physiological powers. I have been able to convince myself in
+the case of several squinting persons, who conscientiously wore the
+spectacles prescribed for them elsewhere, that the squint was concealed
+by this means; that may suffice in some cases, but if it is a question
+of young girls we may well ask, which is to be preferred for appearance
+sake, squint or spectacles.
+
+Tenotomy effects essentially a cosmetic improvement--its object is to
+restore the correct position of the eyes by equalising the elastic
+muscular tensions. The means at our disposal are, the simple separation
+of the tendon of the too-tense muscle from the sclerotic, the
+distribution of the operation between both eyes, and finally, increasing
+the strength of the antagonist by moving forwards its insertion.
+
+The method of tenotomy as I carry it out is as follows: The conjunctiva
+is seized with fine forceps exactly over the insertion of the muscle to
+be divided, and the fold thus raised cut into with the smallest possible
+wound. Provided we operate on the right spot we enter this opening with
+the forceps and immediately seize the tendon close to its insertion on
+the sclerotic, which is drawn forwards, as was the conjunctiva, and
+loosened with flat, curved scissors, the points of which must be rounded
+off. The incision must only be large enough to allow a small hook with a
+knob to be inserted through it and behind the insertion of the tendon,
+which is now lifted up and divided with fine pointed scissors close to
+its insertion into the sclerotic. It is important to make sure that a
+few threads coming off from the tendon at the ends of the insertion do
+not remain uncut; we can only consider the operation to be complete when
+the hook, carried behind the edge of the insertion made clearly visible
+by the foregoing proceeding, slides up to the margin of the cornea
+without any interruption.
+
+The method of performing advancement is as follows: An incision is made
+in the conjunctiva over the tendon of the muscle to be brought forward
+and just at the outer bend of the latter, then loosened together with
+the subconjunctival tissue to the corneal margin; it is desirable to
+carry out this loosening close to the sclerotic, as the flap of the
+conjunctiva thus formed must afford sufficient support to the muscle to
+be brought forward. Then the capsule of Tenon is cut into at one edge of
+the insertion, a flat, curved, blunt hook without a knob is carried
+between muscle and sclerotic, and out again at the other edge of the
+insertion. We must be careful to get the muscle as clean as possible on
+the hook in the whole width of its insertion, that is without the
+capsule of Tenon, for the suture put in ought only to enclose the
+muscle, without at the same time dragging the capsule of Tenon. For the
+suture I always use fine catgut which is provided at both ends with
+curved needles; needles of slightly different form may be chosen in
+order that the threads may be easily distinguished from one another. A
+needle is carried behind the hook from each thread, one through the
+upper, the other through the lower edge of the muscle, between it and
+the sclerotic, then the thread is tied in a knot on the muscle to make
+sure that it does not slip back through the loop of the thread after
+its separation from the sclerotic. Then the threads are knotted on the
+muscle, and the insertion is separated from the sclerotic. As the edge
+of the insertion is now exposed we can see how the land lies, and can
+carry the threads exactly in the direction of the muscle under the
+conjunctiva to the corneal margin, where they are passed through, and
+ends tied in a knot. By this means the muscle is drawn forwards
+precisely in its normal direction and stretched tighter. The wound in
+the conjunctiva is closed by a suture.
+
+It is desirable to slightly stretch the muscle that is to be brought
+forward in both the above operations while the eye is rolled towards the
+opposite side with forceps. Further, as I always operate under
+chloroform, I dispense with the usual test of the immediate effect of
+the operation; such tests have no value before the effects of the
+narcotic have completely disappeared, and one must be sure in the way
+above described that no single fibres are left undivided. I lay special
+stress on the fact that the operation is so performed, that it is able
+to bring about the desired mechanical effect.
+
+The immediate mechanical effects of simple tenotomy may be easily
+deduced; the divided muscle retracts as far as its elasticity and its
+relations with the surrounding tissues permit. With reference to the
+internal and external rectus with which strabotomy specially has to do,
+those relations come principally under observation which the front part
+of the muscle enters into with the conjunctival tissues; the greater the
+extent to which we loosen these relations, the farther the muscle can
+retract. If it is a question of obtaining a greater effect, I am
+accustomed to loosen the subconjunctival tissue at the front part of the
+muscle behind the lachrymal caruncle to a greater extent--this offers
+the additional advantage that the distorting sinking in of the caruncle
+is avoided.
+
+By dividing one rectus its antagonist gains in proportion and rolls the
+eye towards it as far as its own elastic tension and the powers still
+present on the other side permit. The improvement in position which we
+strive to obtain is brought about by the elastic power of the
+antagonist, and not by the tenotomy itself, and it is seen by this then,
+that the term strabotomy simply, does not quite express the
+circumstances of the case. Tenotomy is nothing more than the means for
+procuring a preponderance of the elastic power of the antagonist,
+therefore the effect attainable on the position of the eye does not
+depend solely on the division of the muscle, but to a great extent on
+the elasticity of the antagonist, and may be nullified at once, if the
+antagonist does not perform what we expect from it, and that may happen
+without our being able to foresee it. For example:
+
+CASE 43.--Julie B--, aet. 21, is stated to have squinted inwards since
+her third year, principally with the right eye, but with occasional
+alternation. The deviation amounts to 5 mm., the outward movement of
+both eyes is perfectly normal. Hypermetropia 2 D., visual acuteness 5/18
+on both sides. Ophthalmoscopically with atropine the same degree of
+hypermetropia. Tenotomy of both interni on March 7th, 1879. On March
+14th, deviation 5 mm., just as before. Then renewed division of the
+internal rectus and shortening of the external rectus of the right eye;
+but still the result was insufficient. Therefore, on March 21st, the
+left eye was dealt with in the same way. By this means a normal position
+of the eye was obtained, which was perfectly preserved when I saw the
+patient again a year and a half later. Everything led me to suppose
+beforehand that simple tenotomy of both internal recti would perfectly
+suffice to remove the squint, yet it was of no use, but had to be
+supplemented by shortening both external recti. In such cases I would
+not advise repeated tenotomies, but for the correction of the
+insufficient result as soon as possible by advancement of the
+antagonist.
+
+Advancement very frequently gives us an opportunity of seeing with our
+own eyes the insufficiency of the antagonist and its faulty anatomical
+development. We may suppose this to be the case if the mobility towards
+the side of the antagonist is faulty, however that is no proof;
+considerable insufficiency may co-exist with perfectly normal mobility.
+If limitation of movement is present, to which insufficiency of the
+antagonist may be assigned as the cause, or if it is desirable to obtain
+the greatest possible result by means of an operation on the squinting
+eye, we must combine tenotomy of the deviating muscle with advancement
+of the antagonist. The same is stretched tighter, and rolls the eye more
+strongly to its side, and we can regulate the degree of shortening of
+the muscle, by the distance behind the insertion at which we place the
+threads in the muscle, also by the distance from the corneal margin at
+which we place our anterior sutures, although the rapidly increasing
+ductility of the conjunctiva makes it desirable that we should not go
+far from the corneal margin.
+
+The exact rules for the application of the methods of operation differ
+according to the nature of the case under consideration. If we
+contemplate first the largest group, that of the ordinary permanent
+convergent squint, the choice of the method is principally determined by
+the average degree of deviation, the condition of error, and the visual
+power, lastly by the mobility, particularly the outward movement of the
+eyes. If the visual power of both eyes is nearly the same, or if the
+squinting eye possesses such a visual acuteness that it can be used in
+fixation, it is advisable as a rule to arrange the relations of the
+muscles as equally as possible in both eyes--simple division of the
+internal recti is therefore, as a rule, to be performed in both eyes.
+If, on the other hand, the vision of the squinting eye is in a high
+degree defective, so that only the better one is used, it is generally
+advisable to confine the operation as far as possible to the squinting
+eye; in that case, tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement of
+the external rectus is usually indicated in the squinting eye, and
+frequently suffices.
+
+Deviations which are so slight, that the careful division of both
+interni without loosening the conjunctiva at the front part of the
+muscle makes us fear an excessive result, are seldom the subject of
+operative treatment; if the deviation is slight but still a
+disfigurement, if it amounts to 3 to 4 mm., distribution between both
+eyes is suitable, because, when the squinting eye possesses requisite
+visual acuteness it is put into fixation more frequently after the
+operation than before. Under these circumstances, if the operation is
+confined to the squinting eye, and a sufficient result is thereby
+obtained, as soon as this eye is used for fixation a remarkable
+secondary deviation of the other eye occurs, which is not the case if
+the tensions of the muscles have been balanced by an operation on both
+sides.
+
+A deviation of 5 to 6 mm. may usually be balanced by means of simple
+double tenotomy if the conjunctiva is considerably loosened behind the
+caruncle; not unfrequently, however, we must be careful to strengthen
+the result by means of the after-treatment. Commonly, during the first
+twenty-four hours, the result appears to be quite satisfactory, whilst
+on the second or third day troublesome convergence again sets in. By
+practice of the outward movement we then usually obtain at once a
+perceptible improvement of the position. Both eyes are repeatedly turned
+as far as possible to the right and left, by which means is obtained on
+the one hand, exercise of the external recti, on the other, increase of
+the effect of the tenotomy of the internal recti. I order these
+exercises to be begun on the day after the operation.
+
+Besides this, however, in the relation between accommodation and
+convergence of the visual axes there is a very essential cause which is
+able to lessen the immediate effect of the operation. Persons who squint
+inwards, even if emmetropic, have the habit of combining accommodation
+for near objects with excessive convergence of the visual axes, thus
+the immediate effect of the operation is diminished as soon as they
+begin to use their eyes again. This happens, not by a lessening of the
+effect of the tenotomy, which could, indeed, only be increased by
+exertion of the internal recti, but in that sufficient time is not given
+for the external rectus to regain its normal elastic tension. Nothing is
+changed at first by the operation in the customary relation between
+accommodation and innervation of the internal recti--it is a question,
+then, of avoiding every exertion of the accommodation for some time, in
+order that no inducement for strong convergence should be given. I am
+accustomed, therefore, even in the case of emmetropes, to paralyse the
+accommodation by means of atropine twenty-four hours after the
+operation, and to remove the far-point by convex glasses to about 0.70
+m.; the spectacles must, of course, be worn constantly, for only by that
+means can we be sure that they are always used for near objects. After a
+few weeks the spectacles are discontinued, first for distance, then for
+near objects also. This after-treatment is not necessary under all
+circumstances; but I have repeatedly assured myself that an originally
+sufficient result which perceptibly diminished after a few days, could
+by this means be restored and permanently maintained even in emmetropes.
+
+In the case of hypermetropes, we more often meet with the same
+experience; in permanent convergent squint it is by no means necessary
+to neutralise the hypermetropia permanently after the operation, but it
+happens here more often than in emmetropia, that a perfectly good
+immediate effect is lost within the first week after the operation, and
+can be restored again by permanently wearing the correcting convex
+glasses. In such cases also, I am accustomed after a few months to
+discontinue the spectacles for distance as an experiment, while they are
+still used for working.
+
+Simple tenotomy of both internal recti does not, as a rule, suffice for
+deviations of more than 7 mm.; therefore, even if both eyes possess good
+visual power, we must still decide on tenotomy of both internal recti
+together with advancement of the external rectus of the squinting eye,
+or anticipate repeated tenotomies of the internal recti, or seek to
+obtain the greatest possible effect by means of slight modification of
+the method of procedure.
+
+Provided that the muscle was completely divided, and sufficiently
+loosened from the conjunctiva during the first operation, a repetition
+of the tenotomy can only aim at an increase of the effect if the elastic
+tension of the antagonist has improved in the meantime. I very rarely
+therefore carry out repeated tenotomies; it seems to me much more
+desirable to obtain a sufficient result at one operation whenever that
+is possible.
+
+In some cases where there is a deviation of 7 to 9 mm., the effect of
+the tenotomy may be increased by inducing a strong divergence
+immediately after the tenotomy of the internal recti, which is
+maintained for 6 to 8 hours. For this a thread is passed through the
+conjunctiva at the outer edge of the cornea about 4 mm. above the
+horizontal meridian, and out again about 2 mm. below the horizontal
+meridian, then from below upwards in the same way, so that the
+conjunctiva is contained in a loop. The needle is then passed through
+the external canthus from the conjunctival surface and fastened by tying
+it over a roll of paper. This procedure is only to be recommended in
+exceptional cases; a greater effect on the internal recti is thus
+obtained, while with reference to the position the result depends on the
+elastic tension of the external rectus just as in simple tenotomy.
+
+If the squinting eye has only an unavailable visual acuteness, a
+combination of tenotomy of the internal rectus with shortening of the
+external rectus is the best procedure. As a rule, simple tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the squinting eye is of very little use in such
+cases, as the abducens, weakened by continual extension and wanting
+practice, places too slight an opposing power in the balance. The chief
+effect of the operation then devolves on the other solely available eye,
+which is not a desirable circumstance, and is also frequently
+insufficient. On the other hand, the combination of tenotomy of the
+internal rectus with advancement of the external rectus enables us
+successfully to change the opposing muscular tensions. As a rule, the
+operation may be confined to the squinting, weak-sighted eye, as that
+suffices to obtain a correction of 5 to 6 mm.
+
+If the result is seen to be insufficient, it may be supplemented by
+tenotomy of the internal rectus of the other eye; in the case of
+deviations of more than 7 mm. it is advisable to divide the operation
+between the eyes in this way.
+
+The suture has a special use in so-called artificial strabismus; that
+is, in those cases where convergent is converted into divergent squint
+through unskilful treatment, or where tenotomy of the abducens,
+performed on account of "insufficiency of the internal recti," is
+followed by convergent strabismus. I have not found confirmation of the
+fear expressed by Arlt, that the method proposed by me could be scarcely
+practicable if it is a case of the advancement of a muscle too far
+forward, and I have corrected a large number of such cases in other
+practices. It is seldom profitable to take up things in which others
+have been unsuccessful, but it bring its own reward in the case of
+artificial squint.
+
+Periodic convergent squint offers a less certain ground for the
+operation. The change between normal position and a very considerable
+squint gives rise to the fear that an operation which would be able to
+remove the convergence might finally induce divergent strabismus. This
+fear is certainly not groundless, but at the same time it must be
+remembered that, with the exception perhaps of a few cases of clearly
+accommodative deviation, elastic preponderance of the internal recti or
+insufficiency of the external recti is generally the cause of periodic
+squint also. I have frequently, in periodic squint, performed double
+tenotomy of the internal recti with the slightest possible loosening of
+the conjunctiva. I have also attempted to confine the operation to the
+shortening of the external rectus without loosening the internal recti
+and with success, but not frequently enough to be able to deliver a
+certain opinion upon it.
+
+In periodic squint, the first care must always be to determine the
+condition of refraction, if possible with atropine, and to neutralise or
+over-correct hypermetropia if present. If squint is absent during the
+use of convex glasses, which happens frequently under these
+circumstances, the operation offers no further advantages, as the
+constant use of convex glasses afterwards can hardly be avoided. If the
+periodic deviation continues to exist, the operation can be carried out
+according to the above rules and so as to cause a slight effect.
+
+The final result is usually attained after two to three weeks in
+convergent squint; it is better to allow a slight degree of convergence
+to exist, as divergence, however slight, existing at this time, brings
+with it the fear of a gradual increase. It happens occasionally, that
+after years, convergence asserts itself again; I have observed it in
+spontaneous (see Case 39) as well as in operative cure of squint; still,
+this is so unusual, that I should like to give an illustration of the
+latter observation on account of its rarity.
+
+CASE 44.--Hedw. von L--, aet 10, came under treatment in April, 1874, for
+convergent squint on the left side which arose in her seventh year, with
+occasional alternation. Emmetropia, determined with atropine on both
+sides and good visual acuteness. Diplopia was present at the
+commencement of the squint. Patient can only be rendered conscious of
+double images by the help of a red glass and vertically deviating
+prisms. Double tenotomy of the internal recti effected a normal
+position, and at the end of December, 1874, the continuance of the same
+could be proved as well as binocular fusion with prisms. At the
+beginning of 1880, I was informed that from time to time periodic squint
+had occurred with diplopia. In the middle of March, I had an opportunity
+of seeing the young lady. Myopia 2 D. had meanwhile developed on both
+sides, visual acuteness almost = 1. The position of the eyes was
+perfectly good, slight convergence occurred during covering, homonymous
+double images with a red glass which, at a distance of 5 m., were joined
+by a prism of 8 deg.; stereoscopic fusion was not perfectly certain. A true
+squint could not be proved. On April 3rd, as patient stopped for a few
+hours on her journey through, a striking convergent squint of the left
+eye was seen. The deviation amounted to 4 to 5 mm. Single vision existed
+at a distance of 15 to 20 cm., then homonymous double images appeared,
+which did not correspond to the objective deviation; the double images
+were however corrected by a prism of 6 deg. (base outwards) for an object 5
+m. distant.
+
+We cannot conclude the consideration of the operative treatment of
+convergent squint without once more returning to the relation between
+the line of vision and the position of the cornea. The angle [Greek: a]
+still deserves mention in a few thankful words--_hic mihi angulus
+praeter omnes ridet_--it is a very useful guide in tenotomy. In tenotomy
+we may count as gain the apparent divergence which it causes in
+hypermetropes who do not squint. We obtain a perfect cosmetic result,
+while a convergence, objectively determinable, but not otherwise easily
+visible, continues to exist. It would be folly to exceed this; and for
+cases where binocular fusion does not exist, and where diplopia is not
+present, to wish to remove this covered convergence due to the angle
+[Greek: a], the cosmetic result would be impaired by it.
+
+Those cases where it is a question of uniting homonymous double images
+are very instructive when considering tenotomy. Only when squint arises
+after childhood (after the fifteenth year) does it cause troublesome
+diplopia, this accords naturally with the laws of normal binocular
+fusion learnt meanwhile. (On the other hand those cases, which sometimes
+occur after tenotomy, with the double images in a position which does
+not correspond to the normal physiological laws and which cannot
+therefore be united by prisms, are naturally unsuitable for the
+operative removal of diplopia.) Cases in which convergent squint is
+followed by troublesome double images, appear, with the exception of the
+hysterical form mentioned on p. 41, chiefly in myopia, more seldom in
+emmetropia, and very rarely in hypermetropia; for if the conditions
+contained in the ocular muscles are coincident with hypermetropia,
+squint usually arises in the course of childhood, before normal
+binocular vision has become a fixed habit.
+
+As the cases here under consideration are not very common, I will relate
+a few from which conclusions may be derived as to the effect of
+tenotomy.
+
+CASE 45.--Miss von B--, aet. 14, came under treatment on May 1st, 1875,
+for diplopia, which made its appearance about a year previously.
+Emmetropia and full visual acuteness exist on both sides. The double
+images are homonymous and further apart on both sides of the visual
+field. At first single vision existed only to about 0.75 m.; gradually,
+however, the area of single vision was extended by practice of the
+outward movement, supported by the use of prismatic spectacles, so that
+after a year patient could see singly to a great distance. This
+improvement was not maintained. At the beginning of 1879, diplopia was
+again present to a troublesome degree, particularly on looking
+downwards; on looking straight forwards the left eye showed a slight
+convergent deviation, amounting at most to 2 mm. During various
+examinations the distance of the double images was stated to be now
+less, now greater, a prism of at least 5 deg., at most of 9 deg., was requisite
+for correction. Diplopia was at once removed by tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus, with very slight loosening of the conjunctiva, and has
+not appeared since.
+
+CASE 46.--Miss A--, aet. 17, suffered from diplopia for a few weeks, a
+year and a half ago; for the last half year the diplopia is continuous,
+and striking squint is stated to be sometimes present. Myopia 2 D. on
+both sides, visual acuteness = 5/9. On fixation of an object about 4 m.
+distant, the left eye deviates inwards at most 2 mm.; homonymous double
+images, with a red glass and on correction of the myopia, which were
+united by means of prism 14 deg. at a distance of 5 m., without red glass
+(with retinal images alike on both sides) prism 8 deg. sufficed to unite
+them. If a vertically deviating prism is held before one eye, the double
+images stand just above one another when looking at an object 20 cm.
+off, on nearer approach they are crossed. On May 3rd, 1879, tenotomy of
+the left internal rectus with small conjunctival wound without loosening
+of the conjunctiva, and union of the conjunctival wound by a suture. On
+May 8th, single vision, also with correction of the myopia and with red
+glass. Facultative divergence = 2 deg. On May 14th, with correction of the
+myopia, there was still single vision for distance; however, with red
+glass double images occurred again; and at the end of May the condition
+of the double images was just the same as before the operation. On
+vertical shifting of one visual field by a weak prism the double images
+are brought into a vertical line by means of prism 16 deg., with the base
+outwards. Therefore, on July 1st, the right internal rectus was also
+divided, with small conjunctival wound without loosening of the
+conjunctiva and without suture. The evening after the operation slight
+divergence on covering. On July 24th, binocular single vision is
+present; with red glass homonymous double images at 5 m., corrected by
+prism 4 deg. This time the result was final; for in the middle of October,
+three months after the operation, the report was exactly like the one of
+July 24th above stated.
+
+CASE 47.--Mrs. A--, aet. 33, has suffered for six months from alternating
+convergent squint with diplopia, for a short time even a parallel
+position is still possible. On the right myopia 4 D., V. = 6/12. On the
+left myopia 4 D., V. 6/9. Single vision occurs to 22 cm., at a greater
+distance homonymous double images, whose mutual distance remains the
+same when looking to one side. On correction of the myopia a prism of at
+least 32 deg. is necessary for the union of the double images for an object
+at 4 m. Two days after tenotomy of the internal recti on both sides, the
+facultative divergence amounted to 7 deg. (at 4 m.) on correction of the
+myopia. Single vision was also present when looking strongly to one
+side, and with differentiation of one retinal image by a red glass.
+
+CASE 48.--Mr. B--, aet. 32, first observed the occurrence of diplopia at
+the beginning of April, 1877. Myopia 6 D. is present in both eyes,
+visual acuteness on the right 1/2, on the left rather more than 1/2
+(5/9). The double images are homonymous and sometimes (not always) move
+farther apart at the limits of the visual field. Patient could only
+decide after two years, in July, 1879, on the operative treatment then
+proposed. Diplopia continued to exist; single vision was only now and
+then possible for a short time. On correction of the myopia (if one eye
+is provided with a red glass) prism 12 deg. suffices for union of the double
+images. If one visual field is moved in a vertical direction by a prism
+of 5 deg. during the trial of convergence, prism 38 deg. is necessary in order
+to equalize the lateral deviation of the double images, and to place
+them perpendicularly above one another for an object 5 m. distant. On
+July 14th, tenotomy of the internal rectus of the left eye; single
+vision next day on correction of the myopia, prism 6 deg. is overcome by
+divergence; if, however, double images are produced by a vertically
+deviating prism of 5 deg. they immediately show homonymous lateral
+deviation, which is corrected by prism 18 deg. at a distance of 5 m.
+
+Two months after the operation the diplopia was certainly better, but by
+no means removed; squint occurred periodically as before, so that
+sometimes single vision was possible at 3 to 4 m., sometimes troublesome
+diplopia was present.
+
+During the test of convergence with prisms deviating in a vertical
+direction, a prism of 38 deg. was necessary for the equalization of the
+lateral deviation just as before the operation. Therefore in the middle
+of October the internal rectus of the right eye was divided, and the
+conjunctiva loosened as far as the caruncle. Three days afterwards
+single vision, facultative divergence = prism 5 deg.; in the trial of
+convergence, equalization by means of prism 8 deg. In the middle of
+October, two months after the operation, diplopia had not appeared
+again; facultative divergence = 0; homonymous double images are produced
+by a red glass before one eye, slight convergent deviation on covering
+it, which in the trial of convergence is equalized by prism 20 deg. The
+preponderance of the interni was now so far lessened for the ordinary
+use of the eyes, that permanent binocular single vision was possible.
+
+Notwithstanding the small number of these cases we may conclude from
+them, that homonymous diplopia in typical convergent squint (not
+paralytic) can only be corrected occasionally by one-sided tenotomy when
+the deviation is slight. As a rule it is necessary to distribute the
+operation between the eyes. A result seems attainable by means of simple
+tenotomy on both sides, which is expressed by prism 20 deg. in the trial of
+convergence. In future cases it would be desirable to determine during
+correction of the anomalies of refraction (1) the weakest prism which is
+able to unite the double images at about 5 m. distant (without red
+glass); (2) the distance at which the double images stand apart from one
+another during the trial of convergence with prisms deviating in a
+vertical direction; and (3) the prism which brings the double images
+immediately above one another in the case of objects about 5 m. off.
+
+Next to the cases above discussed stand those where convergent squint
+remains after paralysis of the abducens; at the same time slightly
+defective mobility and a distinct moving apart of the double images
+towards the affected side can usually be detected. In a few such cases I
+could restrict myself to tenotomy of the internal rectus of the affected
+eye, but in those cases which I was able to attend to more particularly,
+double tenotomy was necessary, and did not always suffice. Here also the
+advancement of the external rectus is suitably applied, which I should
+like to illustrate by means of a few examples.
+
+CASE 49.--Mr. B--, aet. 20, was seized by paralysis of the abducens of
+the right eye in November, 1877. In April, 1878, convergent squint was
+still present, and as it continued patient decided on an operation in
+February, 1879. Both eyes are emmetropic and possess full visual
+acuteness.
+
+Immediately before the operation the double images were united at 4 to 5
+m. in the horizontal plane by a prism of 39 deg.; towards the right their
+deviation rather increased. The measurable deviation amounted to 4 mm.
+in the right eye, the secondary deviation of the left to 5 mm. In order
+to proceed carefully, I confined myself at first to tenotomy of the
+internal rectus of the right eye. After the space of a week single
+vision was present at the distance of 1 metre in the middle line and at
+the height of the eyes; at about 5 m. homonymous double images corrected
+by prism 12 deg., together with slight difference in height (= prism 4 deg.,
+base upwards before the right eye). The area of double vision extended
+from the limit of the right visual field to about 20 deg. the other side of
+the middle line.
+
+This result would have sufficed perfectly for a cosmetic tenotomy where
+binocular fusion did not exist; the annoyance caused to patient by
+diplopia, however, was only slightly relieved. I decided, therefore, on
+a second operation, not without fearing an excessive result, and
+performed tenotomy of the left internal rectus with a very small
+conjunctival wound and by closing the wound by means of a suture. The
+result was by no means excessive, for it was perfectly _nil_, apparently
+even negative at first, for a few days after the operation the area of
+single vision approached the eye to less than 0.5 m. and at 4 to 5 m. a
+prism of 20 deg. was requisite for correction; however, eighteen days after
+the tenotomy of the left internus everything was as before. Single
+vision to 1 m. while prism 12 deg. corrected for a distance of 4 to 5 m. The
+tenotomy then had no effect at all on the position of the eye; however,
+the restriction of movement dependent on it, asserted itself in that the
+double images were crossed on the limit of the right visual field (about
+45 deg. towards the right). On the supposition that this insufficient result
+might be caused by the suture of the conjunctival wound I decided to
+repeat the separation of the internal rectus. The agglutination of the
+muscle with the sclerotic is so slight for two to three weeks after the
+operation that the strabismus hook perfectly suffices to sever the
+connection; no suture was put in, but the result again was _nil_, and on
+the day after the operation single vision was only present to 0.5 m. in
+the middle line, just as after the previous tenotomy of the left
+internal rectus. It was now clear that the result with respect to the
+position of the eye was only unsuccessful because the antagonist did not
+do its duty. I shortened the abducens (without touching the internus
+again). The immediate effect, during the chloroform narcosis, was a
+terrible divergence, but on the same evening it was less, and
+twenty-four hours after the operation with a red glass, homonymous
+double images were present close together at a distance of 4 m. Ten days
+afterwards binocular single vision was insured, facultative divergence
+= 3 deg. at 4 m., crossed double images towards the limits of both visual
+fields, but only on moving the eyes in a lateral direction; no practical
+use was made of this. If one could have diagnosed beforehand the
+insufficiency of the externi assuredly present here, which was probably
+the reason for the development of squint on the healing of the paralysis
+of the abducens, one would have been able to combine shortening of the
+right abducens with tenotomy of the internus in the first operation,
+whereas the necessity for the advancement was only shown by the
+abnormally slight effect of the tenotomy on the left side. According to
+accounts received by letter the favorable result has continued.
+
+We obtain a result more quickly by the immediate advancement of the
+abducens. For example:
+
+CASE 50.--Mr. K--, aet. 29, suffered from paresis of the right abducens
+in the autumn of 1877. In December, 1878, convergent squint is present,
+linear deviation 5 mm. (scarcely more on the left than on the right).
+The defect of movement towards the side of the right abducens amounts to
+about 2 or 3 mm. Diplopia is present in the whole visual field with
+increase of the deviation towards the right. Emmetropia and full visual
+acuteness on both sides. Tenotomy of the internal rectus and advancement
+of the abducens of the right eye at the end of December. Three weeks
+later single vision is present in the middle line; on the left limit of
+the visual field crossed double images, on the right side homonymous
+ones, beginning about 20 deg. from the middle line. The result was by no
+means excessive.
+
+In convergent squint with congenital paresis of the abducens, not much
+can be attained without shortening the abducens. Of course only the
+squint can be removed, not the paralysis, but if once a correct position
+is attained for the middle line, cosmetic demands are satisfied; the
+outward movement, which is absent, must be replaced by turning the
+head.
+
+The chief method for absolute divergent squint is the combination of
+shortening with tenotomy of the externus. If the impulse for convergence
+is once lost, so that an associated movement occurs in place of an
+accommodative one on fixation of a point situated on the middle line, a
+removal of the squint cannot be obtained by simple tenotomy of the
+externi--another proof that a change of position of the eye is by no
+means a necessary result of tenotomy.
+
+Moreover, this slight aid given by tenotomy has its ground not solely in
+the condition of the opposing recti muscles. In other practices I have
+seen cases enough in which tenotomy of the externi, performed on account
+of relative divergence, was followed by convergent squint, just as
+injudicious division of the interni may induce divergent squint. It is
+probable, therefore, that the faulty effect of simple tenotomy in
+permanent absolute divergent squint depends on other causes, which, in
+my opinion, are to be found in the obliques. The loop formed by the
+obliques round the posterior circumference of the eye is most stretched,
+when the visual line falls in with the muscular plane of the obliques in
+a medial direction of the eyes. On the whole, then, it is proved that
+the obliques are extended on turning the eyes inwards, but shortened on
+turning the eyes outwards by means of their muscular action. In
+divergent squint, if the movement inwards occurs but seldom or not at
+all, the obliques consequently are not extended in a normal way--it
+follows then that they lose in ductility, offer greater resistance to
+the inward movement, and by means of their elastic tension continually
+draw the posterior pole of the eye inwards and the cornea outwards. As
+in strabotomy we cannot get at the obliques, it seems all the more
+desirable to offer them stronger resistance by greater tension of the
+internus by means of advancement. Certainly tenotomy of the external
+rectus of the fixing eye is as a rule also necessary. A sufficient
+result is usually thus obtained at once; if it is much lessened in the
+course of one or two months there is nothing to prevent the repetition
+of the tenotomy of one or the other external rectus.
+
+The innervation for the movement of convergence is not always perfectly
+lost; it withdraws itself from the influence of binocular fusion because
+this is gradually forgotten while a convergence, even if an insufficient
+one, unites itself with the effort of accommodation. If we ask such
+patients to fix a large object lying near, a pencil, for example, they
+cannot usually converge upon it, whilst if we ask them to read at the
+same distance, a distinct convergent movement occurs; large objects are
+sufficiently clearly recognised, even without distinct retinal images,
+and the supposition that an effort of accommodation is present is only
+justified if we employ sufficiently small objects at the examination, in
+order to distinguish which, clear retinal images are necessary. Of
+course we must have regard to the condition of refraction; myopes, who
+use their far point for reading, want no accommodation, therefore no
+convergent movement occurs, even if the impulse of innervation for it,
+is not yet quite lost. However, the innervation for convergence may be
+lost, without the internal recti losing in elastic tension. The
+operative importance of this relation may be illustrated by an example.
+
+CASE 51.--Bertha K--, aet. 10, has myopia 5 D. on both sides, visual
+acuteness 12/20, and divergent strabismus. At 4 mm. the crossed diplopia
+is corrected by prism 23 deg.; a convergent movement is no longer attained,
+at most parallelism of the visual axes. Tenotomy of both interni on
+October 2nd, 1873. The immediate result was convergent squint, with a
+defect in movement outwards amounting to 4 to 5 mm. in both eyes. On
+October 9th prism 37 deg. was still necessary to unite the homonymous double
+images at a distance of 4 m.; single vision existed only to about 20 cm.
+The area of single vision gradually extended itself; at the end of
+October it was restored for distance also, facultative divergence
+_nil_; however, relative divergence was present for near objects.
+Naturally this was not the result of muscular weakness of the interni,
+for they had proved their capabilities by a convergent squint,
+fortunately only temporary, which made one anxious, but was solely the
+result of a faulty innervation. The further course was also interesting.
+After three years, in October, 1876, the myopia of the left eye amounted
+to 8 D., that of the right 7 D., visual acuteness 1/2 on the right, on
+the left 3/4 of the normal; a posterior staphyloma measuring about 1/3
+of the diameter of the optic disc was present. The left eye was used for
+near objects with relative divergence of the right and the occasional
+occurrence of diplopia; there was convergence only to about 15 cm.
+Facultative divergence _nil_.
+
+We very frequently have the opportunity of seeing, that myopia increases
+even after tenotomy of the externus, and if von Graefe's assertion that
+the progress of myopia would be brought to a standstill by means of
+tenotomy still finds believers, I should like to cite one example which
+offers proof to the contrary.
+
+In permanent divergent squint we shall have, as a rule, to combine
+shortening of the internus of the squinting eye with tenotomy of both
+externi, even if the convergent movement is still possible to a slight
+degree. The result thus obtained differs somewhat; sometimes it suffices
+at once, sometimes a repetition of the separation of the externi is
+necessary later on. Two examples may illustrate this.
+
+CASE 52.--Miss Marie M--, aet. 22, has squinted on the left side since
+her third year, nominally after a keratitis, which left behind in the
+left eye a nebula of the cornea of small circumference. The deviation
+amounts to 8 mm. The visual power is much worse than the opacity of the
+cornea leads us to suppose, with visual axes deviating inwards fingers
+were only counted at a distance of about 1 m.
+
+On the right myopia 1 D., V. = 4/5. A slight convergent movement is
+still practicable. At the end of May, 1879, shortening of the left
+internal rectus, tenotomy of both externi. The next day slight
+convergence on viewing distant objects, correct position after four
+days. In January, 1880, correct position of the eyes, convergence
+possible to about 20 cm. While a correction of 8 mm. was immediately
+obtained here, the same operation does not always permanently suffice
+for slighter deviations.
+
+CASE 53.--Ernest Sp--, aet. 11-1/2; divergent squint had been observed as
+early as his second year. The deviation amounts to 5 or 6 mm., is
+sometimes alternating, generally the left eye deviates. No convergent
+movement on fixing a pencil about 25 cm. distant; the right eye is then
+used for reading, the left one makes a distinct, but not a sufficient,
+movement inwards. Emmetropia on both sides, visual acuteness nearly
+perfect on the right, on the left 2/3 of the normal. Even with red glass
+and prisms deviating in a vertical direction, double images not
+perceived. On October 2nd, 1879, shortening of the left internal rectus,
+tenotomy of both externi. A week later divergence was no longer present.
+When reading, the left eye makes a distinct, perhaps rather too great,
+movement of convergence, and yet six weeks after the operation, distinct
+divergent squint was again present, even if to a slighter degree than
+before; the left eye deviates 3 to 4 mm., the right 2 to 3 mm. outwards.
+The result obtained amounted then to not more than about 3 mm. In the
+middle of December the tenotomy of both externi was therefore repeated.
+A week after the operation convergent squint of 2 mm. is present with
+homonymous diplopia. A pencil made to approach on the middle line is
+seen double to about 20 cm., on approaching nearer, double images are
+not perceived in spite of distinct relative divergence. Double images at
+a distance of 4 m. are corrected by prism 25 deg.; as, however, normal
+binocular vision is not present, the value of this statement is very
+questionable. Three weeks after the second operation the position of the
+eyes was normal, and the slightest convergence was perceived only on
+close investigation. Double images are no longer observed, however they
+may still be brought to view.
+
+In periodic divergent squint, if the deviation is considerable and
+frequent, if at the same time the normal near point of convergence is
+only attained with difficulty or not at all, we can hardly combine
+shortening of the internus with tenotomy of the externus; more often
+indeed, additional tenotomy of the externus of the other eye is
+necessary in order to obtain a permanent cure. In exceptional cases
+(when it seemed to me as if the squint depended more on insufficiency of
+the internus than on preponderance of the externus) I have confined
+myself to shortening the internus without separating the externus; I
+will quote just one example of this.
+
+CASE 54.--Ida K--, aet. 11. On the right, hypermetropia 3 D. with the
+ophthalmoscope, visual acuteness 5/24. No. 0.3 is read with difficulty.
+On the left, with the ophthalmoscope hypermetropia 4.5 D. with
+asymmetric meridian. Single letters of 3.0 m. are recognised with convex
+6.5 D. Fingers are counted at about 1-1/2 m. The choroid is slightly and
+unequally pigmented, no ophthalmoscopically assignable reason exists for
+the considerable visual defect. The left eye frequently deviates
+outwards, convergence is attainable to 15 cm. On May 2nd, 1877,
+shortening of the internus (without tenotomy of the externus). Two weeks
+later slight convergent squint was present; in November, 1877, six
+months after the operation, the position of the left eye was perfectly
+normal.
+
+Tenotomy of the externi suffices when the divergent deviation is
+inconsiderable and does not occur often, if the normal near point of
+convergence can still be reached, and binocular fusion is possible.
+
+If we want to increase the effect of simple tenotomy of the externi,
+this may be done just as well by practice of the associated movements of
+the eyes as by practice of the convergence, of course for a short time
+only after the operation. As long as the detached tendon of the external
+rectus is not re-attached firmly with the sclerotic, all these movements
+of the eyes help to strengthen the result of the tenotomy. In order to
+practise convergence we can bring a suitable fixed point on to a mirror
+and so make it possible for the patient himself to see the position of
+his eyes, of course only in cases where binocular fusion is no longer
+present. He who possesses a normal binocular vision is troubled in these
+exercises by diplopia; but this is not the case in the suppression of
+binocular fusion so frequent as a result of squint.
+
+Periodic divergent squint is divided by no sharply defined limits from
+those cases in which only a preponderance of the externi exists without
+insufficiency of the interni. We frequently find very considerable
+degrees of facultative divergence as a casual symptom, without the
+occurrence of manifest divergence or the presence of asthenopic
+troubles. If this is accompanied by weakness of the interni, absolute
+divergence occurs on looking at near objects, sometimes for distance
+also and certainly if we suppress binocular fusion by covering one eye
+or render it difficult by colouring one visual field with a red glass.
+
+In these cases the indications for the operation are given either by
+asthenopia, by troublesome double images or by the disfigurement
+inseparable from periodic squint; it will depend on the degree of the
+facultative divergence, whether we confine the tenotomy of the externus
+to one eye or whether we distribute it between both eyes.
+
+Finally, it may be desirable to still say a few words as to the most
+favorable period for the operation. The comprehension of the defective
+sight often present in squint as caused by "non-use" has resulted in
+the preposterous advice that tenotomy should be carried out as early as
+possible. I can vouch for the fact that even the earliest tenotomy of
+the ocular muscles is of no avail against congenital amblyopia. I have
+repeatedly seen children on whom tenotomy had been performed in their
+first year, usually with bad cosmetic result but with continuance of
+defective sight of the squinting eye.
+
+The final result of the operation is almost always very unsatisfactory
+when performed on children before their fourth year. I can show a number
+of good results in children on whom I operated between their fifth and
+sixth year; however, the more I considered the subject, the more it
+seemed to me advisable to raise the tests which must be imposed on the
+patients. With children it is not so much a question of determining the
+limit of age, but whether their intelligence is sufficiently developed
+to render a reliable examination possible. A sufficient knowledge of
+letters and the power of reading is necessary to an accurate trial of
+vision; the entire bearing of the children must permit of the
+ophthalmoscopic diagnosis of the weak condition and should raise no
+scruples as to wearing spectacles which may be necessary after the
+operation. Under any circumstances no harm is done by deferring the
+operation until these conditions are fulfilled; the interval may be
+filled up by practising the mobility of the eyes, which does more good
+than the customary strabismus spectacles or even tying up the eye. If we
+tie up the fixing eye, the squinting one is certainly put into fixation,
+but the other squints instead, and of course it is just the same with
+the plan, as childish as it is antiquated, of tying on a pierced walnut
+shell before each eye.
+
+Strabismus spectacles, _i. e._ those with a leather band to go round the
+head, provided with leaden discs which cover one eye completely and
+leave only a side aperture for the other, of course only induce a
+transfer of the squint to the covered eye, together with practice of
+the eye in a lateral direction; but apart from their unsightly
+appearance they require a constant lateral direction of the eye, which
+is followed even after a short time by fatigue of the muscles employed
+and soon becomes unbearable. This is not the case if we cause the
+mobility to be practised alternately and towards both sides; here we
+must insist that the limits of the outward movement are really reached.
+These exercises are at least rational and tend to increase the strength
+of the antagonist, on which we must depend so much in the operation and
+to diminish an insufficiency made worse by want of practice.
+
+
+PRINTED BY ADLARD AND SON, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+Catalogue B] _London, 11, New Burlington Street March, 1887_
+
+
+_SELECTION_
+
+FROM
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE
+
+COMPRISING
+
+_ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM_
+
+ON THE
+
+ART AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE
+
+[Illustration]
+
+N.B.--As far as possible, this List is arranged in the order in which
+medical study is usually pursued.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL publish for the following Institutions and Public
+Bodies:--
+
+ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS.
+ CATALOGUES OF THE MUSEUM.
+ Twenty-three separate Catalogues (List and Prices can be obtained of J.
+& A. CHURCHILL).
+
+GUY'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Vol. XXVIII., Third Series. 7s. 6d.
+ FORMULAE USED IN THE HOSPITAL IN ADDITION TO THOSE
+ IN THE B. P. 1s. 6d.
+
+LONDON HOSPITAL.
+ PHARMACOPOEIA OF THE HOSPITAL. 3s.
+ CLINICAL LECTURES AND REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND
+ SURGICAL STAFF. Vols. I. to IV. 7s. 6d. each.
+
+ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S HOSPITAL.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE ANATOMICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL
+ MUSEUM. Vol. I.--Pathology. 15s. Vol. II.--Teratology, Anatomy
+ and Physiology, Botany. 7s. 6d.
+
+ST. GEORGE'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ The last Volume (X.) was issued in 1880. Price 7s. 6d.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 15s.
+ SUPPLEMENTARY CATALOGUE (1882). 5s.
+
+ST. THOMAS'S HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Annually. Vol. XV., New Series. 7s. 6d.
+
+MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL.
+ CATALOGUE OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MUSEUM. 12s.
+
+WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Annually. Vol. II. 6s.
+
+ROYAL LONDON OPHTHALMIC HOSPITAL.
+ REPORTS BY THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL STAFF.
+ Occasionally. Vol. XI., Part III. 5s.
+
+OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.
+ TRANSACTIONS.
+ Vol. VI. 12s. 6d.
+
+MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION.
+ JOURNAL OF MENTAL SCIENCE.
+ Quarterly. 3s. 6d. each, or 14s. per annum.
+
+PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
+ PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS.
+ Every Saturday. 4d. each, or 20s. per annum, post free.
+
+BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE.
+ YEAR BOOK OF PHARMACY.
+ In December. 10s.
+
+BRITISH DENTAL ASSOCIATION.
+ JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION AND MONTHLY REVIEW
+ OF DENTAL SURGERY.
+ On the 15th of each Month. 6d. each, or 7s. per annum, post free.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+A SELECTION
+
+from
+
+J. & A. CHURCHILL'S GENERAL CATALOGUE,
+
+comprising
+
+ALL RECENT WORKS PUBLISHED BY THEM ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE.
+
+N.B.--_J. & A. Churchill's Descriptive List of Works on Chemistry,
+Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the Microscope,
+and other Branches of Science, can be had on application._
+
+Practical Anatomy: A Manual of Dissections. By CHRISTOPHER HEATH,
+Surgeon to University College Hospital. Sixth Edition. Revised by
+RICKMAN J. GODLEE, M.S. Lond., F.R.C.S., Demonstrator of Anatomy in
+University College, and Assistant Surgeon to the Hospital. Crown 8vo,
+with 24 Coloured Plates and 274 Engravings, 15s.
+
+Wilson's Anatomist's Vade-Mecum. Tenth Edition. By GEORGE BUCHANAN,
+Professor of Clinical Surgery in the University of Glasgow; and HENRY E.
+CLARK, M.R.C.S., Lecturer on Anatomy at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary
+School of Medicine. Crown 8vo, with 450 Engravings (including 26
+Coloured Plates), 18s.
+
+Braune's Atlas of Topographical Anatomy, after Plane Sections of Frozen
+Bodies. Translated by EDWARD BELLAMY, Surgeon to, and Lecturer on
+Anatomy, &c., at, Charing Cross Hospital. Large Imp. 8vo, with 34
+Photolithographic Plates and 46 Woodcuts, 40s.
+
+An Atlas of Human Anatomy. By RICKMAN J. GODLEE, M.S., F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon and Senior Demonstrator of Anatomy, University College
+Hospital. With 48 Imp. 4to Plates (112 figures), and a volume of
+Explanatory Text. 8vo, L4 14s. 6d.
+
+Harvey's (Wm.) Manuscript Lectures. Prelectiones Anatomiae Universalis.
+Edited, with an Autotype reproduction of the Original, by a Committee of
+the Royal College of Physicians of London. Crown 4to, half bound in
+Persian, 52s. 6d.
+
+Anatomy of the Joints of Man. By HENRY MORRIS, Surgeon to, and Lecturer
+on Anatomy and Practical Surgery at, the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with
+44 Lithographic Plates (several being coloured) and 13 Wood Engravings,
+16s.
+
+Manual of the Dissection of the Human Body. By LUTHER HOLDEN, Consulting
+Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Edited by JOHN LANGTON, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to, and Lecturer on Anatomy at, St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+Fifth Edition. 8vo, with 208 Engravings. 20s.
+
+_By the same author._
+
+Human Osteology. Sixth Edition, edited by the Author and JAMES SHUTER,
+F.R.C.S., M.A., M.B., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo, with 61 Lithographic Plates and 89 Engravings. 16s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Landmarks, Medical and Surgical. Fourth Edition. 8vo. [_In the Press._
+
+The Student's Guide to Surgical Anatomy. By EDWARD BELLAMY, F.R.C.S. and
+Member of the Board of Examiners. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 81
+Engravings. 7s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Human Osteology. By WILLIAM WARWICK WAGSTAFFE,
+late Assistant Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with 23
+Plates and 66 Engravings. 10s. 6d.
+
+The Anatomical Remembrancer; or, Complete Pocket Anatomist. Eighth
+Edition. 32mo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diagrams of the Nerves of the Human Body, exhibiting their Origin,
+Divisions, and Connections, with their Distribution to the Various
+Regions of the Cutaneous Surface, and to all the Muscles. By W. H.
+FLOWER, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. Third Edition, with 6 Plates. Roya. 4to, 12s.
+
+General Pathology. An Introduction to. By JOHN BLAND SUTTON, F.R.C.S.,
+Sir E. Wilson Lecturer on Pathology, R.C.S.; Assistant Surgeon to, and
+Lecturer on Anatomy at, Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, with 149 Engravings,
+14s.
+
+Atlas of Pathological Anatomy. By Dr. LANCEREAUX. Translated by W. S.
+GREENFIELD, M.D., Professor of Pathology in the University of Edinburgh.
+Imp. 8vo, with 70 Coloured Plates, L5 5s.
+
+A Manual of Pathological Anatomy. By C. HANDFIELD JONES, M.B., F.R.S.,
+and E. H. SIEVEKING, M.D., F.R.C.P. Edited by J. F. Payne, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on General Pathology at St. Thomas's Hospital. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 195 Engravings, 16s.
+
+Post-mortem Examinations: A Description and Explanation of the Method of
+Performing them, with especial reference to Medico-Legal Practice. By
+Prof. VIRCHOW. Translated by Dr. T. P. SMITH. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+with 4 Plates, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Human Brain: Histological and Coarse Methods of Research. A Manual
+for Students and Asylum Medical Officers. By W. BEVAN LEWIS, L.R.C.P.
+Lond., Medical Superintendent, West Riding Lunatic Asylum. 8vo, with
+Wood Engravings and Photographs, 8s.
+
+Manual of Physiology: For the use of Junior Students of Medicine. By
+GERALD F. YEO, M.D., F.R.C.S., Professor of Physiology in King's
+College, London. Crown 8vo, with 300 Engravings, 14s.
+
+Principles of Human Physiology. By W. B. CARPENTER, C.B., M.D., F.R.S.
+Ninth Edition. By HENRY POWER, M.B., F.R.C.S. 8vo, with 3 Steel Plates
+and 377 Wood Engravings, 31s. 6d.
+
+Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on Physiology. By PHILIP H. PYE-SMITH,
+B.A., M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with
+Diagrams, Notes, and Tables, 5s.
+
+A Treatise on Human Physiology. By JOHN C. DALTON, M.D. Seventh Edition.
+8vo, with 252 Engravings, 20s.
+
+Elementary Practical Biology: Vegetable. By THOMAS W. SHORE, M.D., B.Sc.
+Lond., Lecturer on Comparative Anatomy at St. Bartholomew's Hospital.
+8vo. 6s.
+
+Histology and Histo-Chemistry of Man. By HEINRICH FREY, Professor of
+Medicine in Zurich. Translated by ARTHUR E. J. BARKER, Assistant Surgeon
+to University College Hospital. 8vo, with 608 Engravings, 21s.
+
+A Text-Book of Medical Physics, for Students and Practitioners. By J. C.
+DRAPER, M.D., LL.D., Professor of Physics in the University of New York.
+With 377 Engravings. 8vo, 18s.
+
+The Law of Sex. By G. B. STARKWEATHER, F.R.G.S. With 40 Illustrative
+Portraits. 8vo, 16s.
+
+Influence of Sex in Disease. By W. ROGER WILLIAMS, F.R.C.S., Surgical
+Registrar to the Middlesex Hospital. 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Medical Jurisprudence: Its Principles and Practice. By ALFRED S. TAYLOR,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Third Edition, by THOMAS STEVENSON, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Medical Jurisprudence at Guy's Hospital. 2 vols.
+8vo, with 188 Engravings, 31s. 6d.
+
+By the same Authors.
+
+A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence. Eleventh Edition. Crown 8vo, with 56
+Engravings, 14s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Poisons, In Relation to Medical Jurisprudence and Medicine. Third
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 104 Engravings, 16s.
+
+Lectures on Medical Jurisprudence. By FRANCIS OGSTON, M.D., late
+Professor in the University of Aberdeen. Edited by FRANCIS OGSTON, Jun.,
+M.D. 8vo, with 12 Copper Plates, 18s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Medical Jurisprudence. By JOHN ABERCROMBIE, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Forensic Medicine to Charing Cross Hospital. Fcap.
+8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Microscopical Examination of Drinking Water and of Air. By J. D.
+MACDONALD, M.D., F.R.S., Ex-Professor of Naval Hygiene in the Army
+Medical School. Second Edition. 8vo, with 25 Plates, 7s. 6d.
+
+Pay Hospitals and Paying Wards throughout the World. By HENRY C.
+BURDETT. 8vo, 7s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Cottage Hospitals--General, Fever, and Convalescent: Their Progress,
+Management, and Work. Second Edition, with many Plans and Illustrations.
+Crown 8vo, 14s.
+
+A Manual of Practical Hygiene. By F. A. PARKES, M.D., F.R.S. Sixth
+Edition, by F. DE CHAUMONT, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Military Hygiene
+in the Army Medical School. 8vo, with numerous Plates and Engravings.
+18s.
+
+A Handbook of Hygiene and Sanitary Science. By GEO. WILSON, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.S.E., Medical Officer of Health for Mid-Warwickshire. Sixth Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings. 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Healthy Life and Healthy Dwellings: A Guide to Personal and Domestic
+Hygiene. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Sanitary Examinations Of Water, Air, and Food. A Vade-Mecum for the
+Medical Officer of Health. By CORNELIUS B. FOX, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 110 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Dangers to Health: A Pictorial Guide to Domestic Sanitary Defects. By T.
+PRIDGIN TEALE, M.A., Surgeon to the Leeds General Infirmary. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 70 Lithograph Plates (mostly coloured), 10s.
+
+Hospitals, Infirmaries, and Dispensaries: Their Construction, Interior
+Arrangement, and Management; with Descriptions of existing Institutions,
+and 74 Illustrations. By F. OPPERT, M.D., M.R.C.P.L. Second Edition.
+Royal 8vo, 12s.
+
+Hospital Construction and Management. By F. J. MOUAT, M.D., Local
+Government Board Inspector, and H. SAXON SNELL, Fell. Roy. Inst. Brit.
+Architects. In 2 Parts, 4to, 15s. each; or, the whole work bound in half
+calf, with large Map, 54 Lithographic Plates, and 27 Woodcuts, 35s.
+
+Manual of Anthropometry: A Guide to the Measurement of the Human Body,
+containing an Anthropometrical Chart and Register, a Systematic Table of
+Measurements, &c. By CHARLES ROBERTS, F.R.C.S. 8vo, with numerous
+Illustrations and Tables, 8s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Detection of Colour-Blindness and Imperfect Eyesight. 8vo, with a Table
+of Coloured Wools, and Sheet of Test-types, 5s.
+
+Illustrations of the Influence of the Mind upon the Body in Health and
+Disease; Designed to elucidate the Action of the Imagination. By DANIEL
+HACK TUKE, M.D., F.R.C.P., LL.D. Second Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism. 8vo, 5s.
+
+A Manual of Psychological Medicine. With an Appendix of Cases. By JOHN
+C. BUCKNILL, M.D., F.R.S., and D. HACK TUKE, M.D., F.R.C.P. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with 12 Plates (30 Figures) and Engravings, 25s.
+
+Mental Diseases. Clinical Lectures. By T. S. CLOUSTON, M.D., F.R.C.P.
+Edin., Lecturer on Mental Diseases in the University of Edinburgh. With
+8 Plates (6 Coloured). Crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Private Treatment of the Insane as Single Patients. By EDWARD EAST,
+M.R.C.S., L.S.A. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Manual of Midwifery. By ALFRED L. GALABIN, M.A., M.D., F.R.C.P.,
+Obstetric Physician to, and Lecturer on Midwifery, &c. at, Guy's
+Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 227 Engravings, 15s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Practice of Midwifery. By D. LLOYD ROBERTS,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Clinical Midwifery and Diseases of Women at
+the Owens College; Obstetric Physician to the Manchester Royal
+Infirmary. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 2 Coloured Plates and 127 Wood
+Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on Obstetric Operations: Including the Treatment of Haemorrhage,
+and forming a Guide to the Management of Difficult Labour. By ROBERT
+BARNES, M.D., F.R.C.P., Consulting Obstetric Physician to St. George's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 121 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Clinical History of Medical and Surgical Diseases of Women. Second
+Edition. 8vo, with 181 Engravings, 28s.
+
+Clinical Lectures on Diseases of Women: Delivered in St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital, by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. Third Edition. 8vo,
+16s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Sterility in Woman. Being the Gulstonian Lectures, delivered in the
+Royal College of Physicians, in Feb., 1883. 8vo, 6s.
+
+Notes on Diseases of Women: Specially designed to assist the Student in
+preparing for Examination. By J. J. REYNOLDS, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. Third
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Notes on Midwifery: Specially designed for Students preparing for
+Examination. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 15 Engravings, 4s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Diseases of Women. By ALFRED L. GALABIN,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Obstetric Physician to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+West on the Diseases of Women. Fourth Edition, revised by the Author,
+with numerous Additions by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S.E.,
+Obstetric Physician to St. Bartholomew's Hospital. 8vo, 16s.
+
+Dysmenorrhoea, its Pathology and Treatment. By HEYWOOD SMITH, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Obstetric Aphorisms: For the Use of Students commencing Midwifery
+Practice. By JOSEPH G. SWAYNE, M.D. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Obstetrics. By A. F. A. KING, A.M., M.D., Professor of
+Obstetrics, &c, in the Columbian University, Washington, and the
+University of Vermont. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with 102 Engravings,
+8s.
+
+Handbook of Midwifery for Midwives: By J. E. BURTON, L.R.C.P. Lond.,
+Surgeon to the Hospital for Women, Liverpool. Second Edition. With
+Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 6s.
+
+A Handbook of Uterine Therapeutics, and of Diseases of Women. By E. J.
+TILT, M.D., M.R.C.P. Fourth Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Change of Life In Health and Disease: A Clinical Treatise on the
+Diseases of the Nervous System incidental to Women at the Decline of
+Life. Fourth Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+The Principles and Practice of Gynaecology. By THOMAS ADDIS EMMET, M.D.,
+Surgeon to the Woman's Hospital, New York. Third Edition. Royal 8vo,
+with 150 Engravings, 24s.
+
+Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, and Fallopian Tubes: A Practical
+Treatise by A. COURTY, Professor of Clinical Surgery, Montpellier.
+Translated from Third Edition by his Pupil, AGNES MCLAREN, M.D.,
+M.K.Q.C.P.I., with Preface by J. MATTHEWS DUNCAN, M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo,
+with 424 Engravings, 24s.
+
+The Female Pelvic Organs: Their Surgery, Surgical Pathology, and
+Surgical Anatomy. In a Series of Coloured Plates taken from Nature; with
+Commentaries, Notes, and Cases. By HENRY SAVAGE, M.D., F.R.C.S.,
+Consulting Officer of the Samaritan Free Hospital. Fifth Edition. Roy.
+4to, with 17 Lithographic Plates(15 coloured) and 52 Woodcuts, L1 15s.
+
+Ovarian and Uterine Tumours: Their Pathology and Surgical Treatment. By
+Sir T. SPENCER WELLS, Bart., F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to the
+Samaritan Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings, 21s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Abdominal Tumours: Their Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of Women. By T. GAILLARD THOMAS,
+M.D., Professor of Diseases of Women in the College of Physicians and
+Surgeons, New York. Fifth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 266 Engravings, 25s.
+
+Backward Displacements of the Uterus and Prolapsus Uteri: Treatment by
+the New Method of Shortening the Round Ligaments. By WILLIAM ALEXANDER,
+M.D., M.Ch.Q.U.I., F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Infirmary. Crown
+8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Diseases of Children. By JAS. F. GOODHART, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to Guy's Hospital, and to the Evelina Hospital for
+Sick Children. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of Children. For Practitioners and Students. By W. H. DAY,
+M.D., Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo,
+12s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Disease in Children. By EUSTACE SMITH, M.D.,
+Physician to the King of the Belgians, Physician to the East London
+Hospital for Children. 8vo, 22s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Clinical Studies of Disease in Children. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 7s.
+6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children. Fourth Edition. Post 8vo,
+8s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Manual of the Diseases of Children. With a Formulary. By
+EDWARD ELLIS, M.D. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 10s.
+
+A Manual for Hospital Nurses and others engaged in Attending on the
+Sick. By EDWARD J. DOMVILLE, Surgeon to the Exeter Lying-in Charity.
+Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Nursing, Medical and Surgical. By CHARLES J. CULLINGWORTH,
+M.D., Physician to St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester. Second Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Short Manual for Monthly Nurses. Fcap. 8vo, 1s. 6d.
+
+Notes on Fever Nursing. By J. W. ALLAN, M.B., Physician, Superintendent
+Glasgow Fever Hospital. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Outlines of Infectious Diseases: For the use of Clinical Students. Fcap.
+8vo.
+
+Hospital Sisters and their Duties. By EVA C. E. LUeCKES, Matron to the
+London Hospital. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Diseases and their Commencement. Lectures to Trained Nurses. By DONALD
+W. C. HOOD, M.D., M.R.C.P., Physician to the West London Hospital. Crown
+8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Infant Feeding and its Influence on Life; By C. H. F. ROUTH, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo.
+[Preparing.
+
+Manual of Botany: Including the Structure, Classification, Properties,
+Uses, and Functions of Plants. By ROBERT BENTLEY, Professor of Botany in
+King's College and to the Pharmaceutical Society. Fifth Edition. Crown
+8vo, with 1,178 Engravings, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Guide to Structural, Morphological, and Physiological
+Botany. With 660 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Student's Guide to Systematic Botany, including the Classification
+of Plants and Descriptive Botany. Fcap. 8vo, with 350 Engravings, 3s.
+6d.
+
+Medicinal Plants: Being descriptions, with original figures, of the
+Principal Plants employed in Medicine, and an account of their
+Properties and Uses. By Prof. BENTLEY and Dr. H. TRIMEN. In 4 vols.,
+large 8vo, with 306 Coloured Plates, bound in Half Morocco, Gilt Edges,
+L11 11s.
+
+The National Dispensatory: Containing the Natural History, Chemistry,
+Pharmacy, Actions and Uses of Medicines. By ALFRED STILLE, M.D., LL.D.,
+and John M. Maisch, Ph.D. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 311 Engravings, 36s.
+
+Royle's Manual of Materia Medica and Therapeutics. Sixth Edition,
+including additions and alterations in the B. P. 1885. By JOHN HARLEY,
+M.D., Physician to St. Thomas's Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 139
+Engravings, 15s.
+
+Materia Medica. A Manual for the use of Students. By ISAMBARD OWEN,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Lecturer on Materia Medica, &c., to St. George's
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+Materia Medica and Therapeutics: Vegetable Kingdom--Organic
+Compounds--Animal Kingdom. By CHARLES D. F. PHILLIPS, M.D., F.R.S.
+Edin., late Lecturer on Materia Medica and Therapeutics at the
+Westminster Hospital Medical School. 8vo, 25s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Materia Medica and Therapeutics. By JOHN C.
+THOROWGOOD, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 7s.
+
+The Pharmacopoeia of the London Hospital. Compiled under the direction
+of a Committee appointed by the Hospital Medical Council. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.
+
+A Companion to the British Pharmacopoeia. By PETER SQUIRE, Revised by
+his Sons, P. W. and A. H. Squire. 14th Edition. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Authors._
+
+The Pharmacopoeias of the London Hospitals, arranged in Groups for
+Easy Reference and Comparison. Fifth Edition. 18mo, 6s.
+
+The Prescriber's Pharmacopoeia: The Medicines arranged in Classes
+according to their Action, with their Composition and Doses. By NESTOR
+J. C. TIRARD, M.D., F.R.C.P., Professor of Materia Medica and
+Therapeutics in King's College, London. Sixth Edition. 32mo, bound in
+leather, 3s.
+
+Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Treatise on the Diagnosis and Treatment
+of Disease. By AUSTIN FLINT, M.D., Professor of Medicine in the Bellevue
+Hospital Medical College. 8vo, 20s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Medicine. Sixth Edition. By
+the AUTHOR, and W. H. WELCH, M.D., and AUSTIN FLINT, jun., M.D. 8vo,
+with Engravings, 26s.
+
+Climate and Fevers of India, with a series of Cases (Croonian Lectures,
+1882). By Sir JOSEPH FAYRER, K.C.S.I., M.D. 8vo, with 17 Temperature
+Charts, 12s.
+
+Family Medicine for India. A Manual. By WILLIAM J. MOORE, M.D., C.I.E.,
+Honorary Surgeon to the Viceroy of India. Published under the Authority
+of the Government of India. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with Engravings.
+[_In the Press._
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Manual of the Diseases of India: With a Compendium of Diseases
+generally. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 10s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids, in India, at Home, and Abroad.
+Post 8vo, 5s.
+
+Practical Therapeutics: A Manual. By EDWARD J. WARING, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., and DUDLEY W. BUXTON, M.D., B.S. Lond. Fourth Edition. Crown
+8vo, 14s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Bazaar Medicines of India, And Common Medical Plants: With Full Index of
+Diseases, indicating their Treatment by these and other Agents
+procurable throughout India, &c. Fourth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+A Commentary on the Diseases of India. By NORMAN CHEVERS, C.I.E., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., Deputy Surgeon-General H. M. Indian Army. 8vo, 24s.
+
+The Principles and Practice of Medicine. By C. HILTON FAGGE, M.D. Edited
+by P. H. PYE-SMITH, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to, and Lecturer on
+Medicine at, Guy's Hospital. 2 vols. 8vo, 1860 pp. Cloth, 36s.; Half
+Persian, 42s.
+
+The Student's Guide to the Practice of Medicine. By MATTHEW CHARTERIS,
+M.D., Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Glasgow. Fourth
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings on Copper and Wood. 9s.
+
+Hooper's Physicians' Vade-Mecum. A Manual of the Principles and Practice
+of Physic. Tenth Edition. By W. A. GUY, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., and J. HARLEY,
+M.D., F.R.C.P. With 118 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Clinical Medicine and Case-Taking. By FRANCIS
+WARNER, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+How to Examine the Chest: Being a Practical Guide for the use of
+Students. By SAMUEL WEST, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the City of
+London Hospital for Diseases of the Chest; Medical Tutor and Registrar
+at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. With 42 Engravings. Fcap. 8vo, 5s.
+
+The Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, and its Antiseptic
+Treatment. By J. BURNEY YEO, M.D., Physician to King's College Hospital.
+Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Operative Treatment of Intra-thoracic Effusion. Fothergillian Prize
+Essay. By NORMAN PORRITT, L.R.C.P. Lond., M.R.C.S. With Engravings.
+Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+Diseases of the Chest: Contributions to their Clinical History,
+Pathology, and Treatment. By A. T. HOUGHTON WATERS, M.D., Physician to
+the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second Edition. 8vo, with Plates, 15s.
+
+The Student's Guide to Medical Diagnosis. By SAMUEL FENWICK, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital, and BEDFORD FENWICK, M.D.,
+M.R.C.P. Sixth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 114 Engravings, 7s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Outlines of Medical Treatment. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+7s.
+
+_Also._
+
+On Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach, and on the Nervous Affections of the
+Digestive Organs. 8vo, 8s.
+
+The Microscope in Medicine. By LIONEL S. BEALE, M.B., F.R.S., Physician
+to King's College Hospital. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with 86 Plates, 21s.
+
+_Also._
+
+On Slight Ailments: Their Nature and Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, 5s.
+
+The Spectroscope in Medicine. By CHARLES A. MACMUNN, B.A., M.D. 8vo,
+with 3 Chromo-lithographic Plates of Physiological and Pathological
+Spectra, and 13 Engravings, 9s.
+
+Notes on Asthma: Its Forms and Treatment. By JOHN C. THOROWGOOD, M.D.,
+Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Chest. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+What is Consumption? By G. W. HAMBLETON, L.K.Q.C.P.I. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Winter Cough (Catarrh, Bronchitis, Emphysema, Asthma). By HORACE DOBELL,
+M.D., Consulting Physician to the Royal Hospital for Diseases of the
+Chest. Third Edition. 8vo, with Coloured Plates, 10s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Loss of Weight, Blood-Spitting, and Lung Disease. Second Edition. 8vo,
+with Chromo-lithograph, 10s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Mont Dore Cure, and the Proper Way to Use it. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Pulmonary Consumption: A Practical Treatise on its Cure with Medicinal,
+Dietetic, and Hygienic Remedies. By JAMES WEAVER, M.D., L.R.C.P. Crown
+8vo, 2s.
+
+Croonian Lectures on Some Points in the Pathology and Treatment of
+Typhoid Fever. By WILLIAM CAYLEY, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the
+Middlesex and the London Fever Hospitals. Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Treatment of Some of the Forms of Valvular Disease of the Heart. By A.
+E. SANSOM, M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the London Hospital. Second
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 26 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Heart and Aorta: Clinical Lectures. By G. W. BALFOUR,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Edin., late Senior Physician and Lecturer on
+Clinical Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Chromo-lithograph and Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Medical Ophthalmoscopy: A Manual and Atlas. By WILLIAM R. GOWERS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine in University
+College, and Senior Assistant Physician to the Hospital. Second Edition,
+with Coloured Autotype and Lithographic Plates and Woodcuts. 8vo, 18s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis: A Clinical Lecture. 8vo, with
+Engravings and Plate, 3s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diagnosis of Diseases of the Spinal Cord. Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diagnosis of Diseases of the Brain. 8vo, with Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+A Manual of Diseases of the Nervous System. Vol. I. Diseases of the
+Spinal Cord and Nerves. Roy. 8vo, with 171 Engravings (many figures),
+12s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System. Lectures delivered at Guy's Hospital. By
+SAMUEL WILKS, M.D., F.R.S. Second Edition. 8vo, 18s.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System: Especially in Women. By S. WEIR
+MITCHELL, M.D., Physician to the Philadelphia Infirmary for Diseases of
+the Nervous System. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 8s.
+
+Nerve Vibration and Excitation, as Agents in the Treatment of Functional
+Disorder and Organic Disease. By J. MORTIMER GRANVILLE, M.D. 8vo, 5s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Gout in its Clinical Aspects. Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+Regimen to be adopted in Cases of Gout. By WILHELM EBSTEIN, M.D.,
+Professor of Clinical Medicine in Goettingen. Translated by JOHN SCOTT,
+M.A., M.B. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Nervous System. Clinical Lectures. By THOMAS BUZZARD,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., Physician to the National Hospital for the Paralysed and
+Epileptic. With Engravings, 8vo. 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Some Forms of Paralysis from Peripheral Neuritis: of Gouty, Alcoholic,
+Diphtheritic, and other origin. Crown 8vo, 5s.
+
+Diseases of the Liver: With and without Jaundice. By GEORGE HARLEY,
+M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. 8vo, with 2 Plates and 36 Engravings, 21s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Inflammations of the Liver, and their Sequelae. Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+Gout, Rheumatism, And the Allied Affections; with Chapters on Longevity
+and Sleep. By PETER HOOD, M.D. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Stomach: The Varieties of Dyspepsia, their Diagnosis and
+Treatment. By S. O. HABERSHON, M.D., F.R.C.P. Third Edition. Crown 8vo,
+5s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pathology of the Pneumogastric Nerve: Lumleian Lectures for 1876. Second
+Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diseases of the Abdomen, Comprising those of the Stomach and other parts
+of the Alimentary Canal, (Esophagus, Caecum, Intestines, and Peritoneum)
+Third Edition. 8vo, with 5 Plates, 21s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Diseases of the Liver, Their Pathology and Treatment. Lettsomian
+Lectures. Second Edition. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+Acute Intestinal Strangulation, And Chronic Intestinal Obstruction (Mode
+of Death from). By THOMAS BRYANT, F.R.C.S., Senior Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. 8vo, 3s.
+
+A Treatise on the Diseases of the Nervous System. By JAMES ROSS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition. 2 vols. 8vo, with Lithographs, Photographs, and 332 Woodcuts,
+52s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Handbook of the Diseases of the Nervous System. Roy. 8vo, with 184
+Engravings, 18s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Aphasia: Being a Contribution to the Subject of the Dissolution of
+Speech from Cerebral Disease. 8vo, with Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease. (Gulstonian Lectures.) By SEYMOUR J.
+SHARKEY, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.P., Assistant Physician to, and Joint
+Lecturer on Pathology at, St. Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.
+
+On Megrim, Sick Headache, and some Allied Disorders: A Contribution to
+the Pathology of Nerve Storms. By E. LIVEING, M.D., F.R.C.P. 8vo, 15s.
+
+Food and Dietetics, Physiologically and Therapeutically Considered. By
+F. W. PAVY, M.D., F.R.S., Physician to Guy's Hospital. Second Edition.
+8vo, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Croonian Lectures on Certain Points connected with Diabetes. 8vo, 4s.
+6d.
+
+Headaches: Their Nature, Causes, and Treatment. By W. H. DAY, M.D.,
+Physician to the Samaritan Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with
+Engravings. [In the Press.
+
+Health Resorts at Home and Abroad. By MATTHEW CHARTERIS, M.D., Physician
+to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with Map, 4s. 6d.
+
+The Principal Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts: their Climate and
+Medical Aspect. By WILLIAM MARCET, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. With
+Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Winter and Spring On the Shores of the Mediterranean. By HENRY BENNET,
+M.D. Fifth Edition. Post 8vo, with numerous Plates, Maps, and
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Treatment of Pulmonary Consumption by Hygiene, Climate, and Medicine.
+Third Edition. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+The Riviera: Sketches of the Health-Resorts of the Coast of France and
+Italy, from Hyeres to Spezia: its Medical Aspect and Value, &c. By
+EDWARD I. SPARKS, M.B., F.R.C.P. Crown 8vo, 8s. 6d.
+
+Medical Guide to the Mineral Waters of France and its Wintering
+Stations. With a Special Map. By A. VINTRAS, M.D., Physician to the
+French Embassy, and to the French Hospital, London. Crown 8vo, 8s.
+
+The Ocean as a Health-Resort: A Practical Handbook of the Sea, for the
+use of Tourists and Health-Seekers. By WILLIAM S. WILSON, L.R.C.P.
+Second Edition, with Chart of Ocean Routes, &c. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Ambulance Handbook for Volunteers and Others. By J. ARDAVON RAYE, L.K. &
+Q.C.P.I., L.R.C.S.I., late Surgeon to H.B.M. Transport No. 14, Zulu
+Campaign, and Surgeon E.I.R. Rifles. 8vo, with 16 Plates (50 figures),
+3s. 6d.
+
+Ambulance Lectures: To which is added a NURSING LECTURE. By JOHN M. H.
+MARTIN, Honorary Surgeon to the Blackburn Infirmary. Crown 8vo, with 53
+Engravings, 2s.
+
+Handbook of Medical and Surgical Electricity. By HERBERT TIBBITS, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P.E., Senior Physician to the West London Hospital for Paralysis
+and Epilepsy. Second Edition. 8vo, with 95 Engravings, 9s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+How to Use a Galvanic Battery in Medicine and Surgery. Third Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 4s.
+
+_Also._
+
+A Map of Ziemssen's Motor Points of the Human Body: A Guide to Localised
+Electrisation. Mounted on Rollers, 35 x 21. With 20 Illustrations, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations Delivered at the School of
+Massage and Electricity. Crown 8vo, with Illustrations, 5s.
+
+Surgical Emergencies: Together with the Emergencies attendant on
+Parturition and the Treatment of Poisoning. By PAUL SWAIN, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the South Devon and East Cornwall Hospital. Third Edition.
+Crown 8vo, with 117 Engravings, 5s.
+
+Operative Surgery in the Calcutta Medical College Hospital. Statistics,
+Cases, and Comments. By KENNETH MCLEOD, A.M., M.D., F.R.C.S.E.,
+Surgeon-Major, Indian Medical Service, Professor of Surgery in Calcutta
+Medical College. 8vo, with Illustrations, 12s. 6d.
+
+A Course of Operative Surgery. By Christopher Heath, Surgeon to
+University College Hospital. Second Edition. With 20 coloured Plates
+(180 figures) from Nature, by M. LEVEILLE, and several Woodcuts. Large
+8vo, 30s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Student's Guide to Surgical Diagnosis. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo,
+6s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Manual of Minor Surgery and Bandaging. For the use of House-Surgeons,
+Dressers, and Junior Practitioners. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 142
+Engravings, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws. Third Edition. 8vo, with Plate and
+206 Wood Engravings, 14s.
+
+Injuries and Diseases of the Neck and Head, the Genito-Urinary Organs,
+and the Rectum. Hunterian Lectures, 1885. By EDWARD LUND, F.R.C.S.,
+Professor of Surgery in the Owens College, Manchester. 8vo, with Plates
+and Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+The Practice of Surgery: A Manual. By Thomas Bryant, Surgeon to Guy's
+Hospital. Fourth Edition. 2 vols, crown 8vo, with 750 Engravings (many
+being coloured), and including 6 chromo plates, 32s.
+
+The Surgeon's Vade-Mecum: A Manual of Modern Surgery. By R. DRUITT,
+F.R.C.S. Twelfth Edition. By STANLEY BOYD, M.B., F.R.C.S. Assistant
+Surgeon and Pathologist to Charing Cross Hospital. Crown 8vo, with 373
+Engravings 16s.
+
+Regional Surgery: Including Surgical Diagnosis. A Manual for the use of
+Students. By F. A. SOUTHAM, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to
+the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Part I. The Head and Neck. Crown 8vo,
+6s. 6d.--Part II. The Upper Extremity and Thorax. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+Part III. The Abdomen and Lower Extremity. Crown 8vo, 7s.
+
+Surgical Enquiries: Including the Hastings Essay on Shock, the Treatment
+of Inflammations, and numerous Clinical Lectures. By FURNEAUX JORDAN,
+F.R.C.S., Professor of Surgery, Queen's College, Birmingham. Second
+Edition, with numerous Plates. Royal 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Illustrations of Clinical Surgery. By JONATHAN HUTCHINSON, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital. In occasional fasciculi. I. to
+XVIII., 6s. 6d. each. Fasciculi I. to X. bound, with Appendix and Index,
+L3 10s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Pedigree of Disease: Being Six Lectures on Temperament, Idiosyncrasy,
+and Diathesis. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Treatment of Wounds and Fractures. Clinical Lectures. By SAMPSON GAMGEE,
+F.R.S.E., Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham. Second Edition.
+8vo, with 40 Engravings, 10s.
+
+Electricity and its Manner of Working in the Treatment of Disease. By
+WM. E. STEAVENSON, M.D., Physician and Electrician to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on Orthopaedic Surgery. By BERNARD E. BRODHURST, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+On Anchylosis, and the Treatment for the Removal of Deformity and the
+Restoration of Mobility in Various Joints. Fourth Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Curvatures and Diseases of the Spine. Third Edition. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 6s.
+
+Diseases of Bones and Joints. By CHARLES MACNAMARA, F.R.C.S., Surgeon
+to, and Lecturer on Surgery at, the Westminster Hospital. 8vo, with
+Plates and Engravings, 12s.
+
+Injuries of the Spine and Spinal Cord, and NERVOUS SHOCK, in their
+Surgical and Medico-Legal Aspects. By HERBERT W. PAGE, M.C. Cantab.,
+F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St. Mary's Hospital. Second Edition, post 8vo, 10s.
+
+Face and Foot Deformities. By FREDERICK CHURCHILL, C.M., Surgeon to the
+Victoria Hospital for Children. 8vo, with Plates and Illustrations, 10s.
+6d.
+
+Clubfoot: Its Causes, Pathology, and Treatment. By WM. ADAMS, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Great Northern Hospital. Second Edition. 8vo, with 106
+Engravings and 6 Lithographic Plates, 15s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+On Contraction of the Fingers, and its Treatment by Subcutaneous
+Operation; and on Obliteration of Depressed Cicatrices, by the same
+Method. 8vo, with 30 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Lateral and other Forms of Curvature of the Spine: Their Pathology and
+Treatment. Second Edition. 8vo, with 5 Lithographic Plates and 72 Wood
+Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Spinal Curvatures: Treatment by Extension and Jacket; with Remarks on
+some Affections of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle-joints. By H. MACNAUGHTON
+JONES, M.D., F.R.C.S. I. and Edin. Post 8vo, with 63 Engravings, 4s. 6d.
+
+On Diseases and Injuries of the Eye: A Course of Systematic and Clinical
+Lectures to Students and Medical Practitioners. By J. R. WOLFe, M.D.,
+F.R.C.S.E., Lecturer on Ophthalmic Medicine and Surgery in Anderson's
+College, Glasgow. With 10 Coloured Plates and 157 Wood Engravings. 8vo,
+L1 1s.
+
+Hints on Ophthalmic Out-Patient Practice. By CHARLES HIGGENS, Ophthalmic
+Surgeon to Guy's Hospital. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 3s.
+
+Short Sight, Long Sight, and Astigmatism. By GEORGE F. HELM, M.A., M.D.,
+F.R.C.S., formerly Demonstrator of Anatomy in the Cambridge Medical
+School. Crown 8vo, with 35 Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Manual of the Diseases of the Eye. By CHARLES MACNAMARA, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to Westminster Hospital. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo, with 4
+Coloured Plates and 66 Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Diseases of the Eye. By EDWARD NETTLESHIP,
+F.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fourth Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings and a Set of Coloured Papers illustrating
+Colour-Blindness, [_Nearly Ready._
+
+Normal and Pathological Histology of the Human Eye and Eyelids. By C.
+FRED. POLLOCK, M.D., F.R.C.S. and F.R.S.E., Surgeon for Diseases of the
+Eye to Anderson's College Dispensary, Glasgow. Crown 8vo, with 100
+Plates (230 drawings), 15s.
+
+Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy. Composed of 12 Chromo-lithographic Plates (59
+Figures drawn from nature) and Explanatory Text. By RICHARD LIEBREICH,
+M.R.C.S. Translated by H. ROSBOROUGH SWANZY, M.B. Third edition, 4to,
+40s.
+
+Glaucoma: Its Causes, Symptoms, Pathology, and Treatment. By PRIESTLEY
+SMITH, M.R.C.S., Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham.
+8vo, with Lithographic Plates, 10s. 6d.
+
+Refraction of the Eye: A Manual for Students. By GUSTAVUS HARTRIDGE,
+F.R.C.S., Assistant Physician to the Royal Westminster Ophthalmic
+Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with Lithographic Plate and 94
+Woodcuts, 5s. 6d.
+
+The Electro-Magnet, And its Employment in Ophthalmic Surgery. By SIMEON
+SNELL, Ophthalmic Surgeon to the Sheffield General Infirmary, &c. Crown
+8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate. By FRANCIS MASON, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to St.
+Thomas's Hospital. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 6s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+The Surgery of the Face. 8vo, with 100 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Aural Surgery. By H. MACNAUGHTON JONES, M.D.,
+Professor of the Queen's University in Ireland, late Surgeon to the Cork
+Ophthalmic and Aural Hospital. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 63
+Engravings, 8s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Atlas of Diseases of the Membrana Tympani. In Coloured Plates,
+containing 62 Figures, with Text. Crown 4to, 21s.
+
+Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele: Its Etiology, Clinical Characters,
+Pathology, Distribution, Relations to Cretinism, Myxoedema, &c., and
+Treatment. By WILLIAM ROBINSON, M.D. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Diseases and Injuries of the Ear. By Sir WILLIAM B. DALBY, Aural Surgeon
+to St. George's Hospital. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, with Engravings, 7s.
+6d.
+
+_By the Same Author._
+
+Short Contributions to Aural Surgery, between 1875 and 1886. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Throat and Nose: A Manual. By MORELL MACKENZIE, M.D.
+Lond., Senior Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat.
+
+Vol. II. Diseases of the Nose and Naso-Pharynx; with a Section on
+Diseases of the Oesophagus. Post 8vo, with 93 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diphtheria: Its Nature and Treatment, Varieties, and Local Expressions.
+8vo, 5s.
+
+Lectures on Syphilis of the Larynx (Lesions of the Secondary and
+Intermediate Stages). By W. M. WHISTLER, M.D., Physician to the Hospital
+for Diseases of the Throat. Post 8vo, 4s.
+
+Sore Throat: Its Nature, Varieties, and Treatment. By PROSSER JAMES,
+M.D., Physician to the Hospital for Diseases of the Throat. Fifth
+Edition. Post 8vo, with Coloured Plates and Engravings, 6s. 6d.
+
+A Treatise on Vocal Physiology and Hygiene. By GORDON HOLMES, M.D.,
+Physician to the Municipal Throat and Ear Infirmary. Second Edition,
+with Engravings. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+A Guide to the Use of the Laryngoscope in General Practice. Crown 8vo,
+with Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+A System of Dental Surgery. By Sir JOHN TOMES, F.R.S., and C. S. Tomes,
+M.A., F.R.S. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with many Engravings. [_Nearly
+Ready._
+
+Dental Anatomy, Human and Comparative: A Manual. By CHARLES S. TOMES,
+M.A., F.R.S. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, with 191 Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+The Student's Guide to Dental Anatomy and Surgery. By HENRY SEWILL,
+M.R.C.S., L.D.S. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, with 78 Engravings, 5s. 6d.
+
+Notes on Dental Practice. By HENRY C. QUINBY, L.D.S. R.C.S.I. 8vo, with
+87 Engravings, 9s.
+
+Mechanical Dentistry in Gold and Vulcanite. By F. H. BALKWILL, L.D.S.
+R.C.S. 8vo, with 2 Lithographic Plates and 57 Engravings, 10s.
+
+A Practical Treatise on Mechanical Dentistry. By JOSEPH RICHARDSON,
+M.D., D.D.S., late Emeritus Professor of Prosthetic Dentistry in the
+Indiana Medical College. Fourth Edition. Roy. 8vo, with 458 Engravings,
+21s.
+
+Principles and Practice of Dentistry: including Anatomy, Physiology,
+Pathology, Therapeutics, Dental Surgery, and Mechanism. By C. A. HARRIS,
+M.D., D.D.S. Edited by F. J. S. GORGAS, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Professor in
+the Dental Department of Maryland University. Eleventh Edition. 8vo,
+with 750 Illustrations, 31s. 6d.
+
+A Manual of Dental Mechanics. By OAKLEY COLES, L.D.S. R.C.S. Second
+Edition. Crown 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 7s. 6d.
+
+Elements of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, with
+Pharmacopoeia. By JAMES STOCKEN, L.D.S. R.C.S., Pereira Prizeman for
+Materia Medica, and THOMAS GADDES, L.D.S. Eng. and Edin. Third Edition.
+Fcap. 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+Dental Medicine: A Manual of Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics. By
+F. J. S. GORGAS, A.M., M.D., D.D.S., Editor of "Harris's Principles and
+Practice of Dentistry," Professor in the Dental Department of Maryland
+University. 8vo, 14s.
+
+Atlas of Skin Diseases. By TILBURY FOX, M.D., F.R.C.P. With 72 Coloured
+Plates. Royal 4to, half morocco, L6 6s.
+
+Diseases of the Skin: With an Analysis of 8,000 Consecutive Cases and a
+Formulary. By L. D. BULKLEY, M.D., Physician for Skin Diseases at the
+New York Hospital. Crown 8vo, 6s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Acne: its Etiology, Pathology, and Treatment: Based upon a Study of
+1,500 Cases. 8vo, with Engravings, 10s.
+
+On Certain Rare Diseases of the Skin. By JONATHAN HUTCHINSON, F.R.S.,
+Senior Surgeon to the London Hospital, and to the Hospital for Diseases
+of the Skin. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Skin: A Practical Treatise for the Use of Students and
+Practitioners. By J. N. HYDE, A.M., M.D., Professor of Skin and Venereal
+Diseases, Rush Medical College, Chicago. 8vo, with 66 Engravings, 17s.
+
+Parasites: A Treatise on the Entozoa of Man and Animals, including some
+Account of the Ectozoa. By T. SPENCER COBBOLD, M.D., F.R.S. 8vo, with 85
+Engravings, 15s.
+
+Manual of Animal Vaccination, preceded by Considerations on Vaccination
+in general. By E. WARLOMONT, M.D., Founder of the State Vaccine
+Institute of Belgium. Translated and edited by ARTHUR J. HARRIES, M.D.
+Crown 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Leprosy in British Guiana. By JOHN D. HILLIS, F.R.C.S., M.R.I.A.,
+Medical Superintendent of the Leper Asylum, British Guiana. Imp. 8vo,
+with 22 Lithographic Coloured Plates and Wood Engravings, L1 11s. 6d.
+
+Cancer of the Breast. By THOMAS W. NUNN, F.R.C.S., Consulting Surgeon to
+the Middlesex Hospital. 4to, with 21 Coloured Plates, L2 2s.
+
+On Cancer: Its Allies, and other Tumours; their Medical and Surgical
+Treatment. By F. A. PURCELL, M.D., M.C., Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital,
+Brompton. 8vo, with 21 Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Sarcoma and Carcinoma: Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By
+HENRY T. BUTLIN, F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital. 8vo, with 4 Plates, 8s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Malignant Disease of the Larynx (Sarcoma and Carcinoma). 8vo, with 5
+Engravings, 5s.
+
+Cancerous Affections of the Skin. (Epithelioma and Rodent Ulcer.) By
+GEORGE THIN, M.D. Post 8vo, with 8 Engravings, 5s.
+
+Cancer of the Mouth, Tongue, and Alimentary Tract: their Pathology,
+Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. By FREDERIC B. JESSETT, F.R.C.S.,
+Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. 8vo, 10s.
+
+Clinical Notes on Cancer, Its Etiology and Treatment; with special
+reference to the Heredity-Fallacy, and to the Neurotic Origin of most
+Cases of Alveolar Carcinoma. By HERBERT L. SNOW, M.D. Lond., Surgeon to
+the Cancer Hospital, Brompton. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Lectures on the Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs. By REGINALD
+HARRISON, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the Liverpool Royal Infirmary. Second
+Edition, with 48 Engravings. 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+Hydrocele: Its several Varieties and their Treatment. By SAMUEL OSBORN,
+late Surgical Registrar to St. Thomas's Hospital. Fcap. 8vo, with
+Engravings, 3s.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diseases of the Testis. Fcap. 8vo, with Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+Diseases of the Urinary Organs. Clinical Lectures. By Sir HENRY
+THOMPSON, F.R.C.S., Emeritus Professor of Clinical Surgery in University
+College. Seventh (Students') Edition. 8vo, with 84 Engravings, 2s. 6d.
+
+_By the same Author._
+
+Diseases of the Prostate: Their Pathology and Treatment. Sixth Edition.
+8vo, with 39 Engravings, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Surgery of the Urinary Organs. Some Important Points connected
+therewith. Lectures delivered in the R.C.S. 8vo, with 44 Engravings.
+Students' Edition, 2s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Practical Lithotomy and Lithotrity; or, An Inquiry into the Best Modes
+of Removing Stone from the Bladder. Third Edition. 8vo, with 87
+Engravings, 10s.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Preventive Treatment of Calculous Disease, and the Use of Solvent
+Remedies. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 2s. 6d.
+
+_Also._
+
+Tumours of the Bladder: Their Nature, Symptoms, and Surgical Treatment.
+8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 5s.
+
+_Also._
+
+Stricture of the Urethra, and Urinary Fistulaae: their Pathology and
+Treatment. Fourth Edition. With 74 Engravings. 8vo, 6s.
+
+_Also._
+
+The Suprapubic Operation of Opening the Bladder for the Stone and for
+Tumours. 8vo, with 14 Engravings, 3s. 6d.
+
+The Surgery of the Rectum. By HENRY SMITH, Professor of Surgery in
+King's College, Surgeon to the Hospital. Fifth Edition. 8vo, 6s.
+
+Modern Treatment of Stone in the Bladder by Litholopaxy. By P. J.
+FREYER, M.A., M.D., M.Ch., Bengal Medical Service. 8vo, with Engravings,
+5s.
+
+Diseases of the Testis, Spermatic Cord, and Scrotum. By THOMAS B.
+CURLING, F.R.S., Consulting Surgeon to the London Hospital. Fourth
+Edition. 8vo, with Engravings, 16s.
+
+Diseases of the Rectum and Anus. By W. HARRISON CRIPPS, F.R.C.S.,
+Assistant Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, &c. 8vo, with 13
+Lithographic Plates and numerous Wood Engravings, 12s. 6d.
+
+Urinary and Renal Derangements and Calculous Disorders. By LIONEL S.
+BEALE, F.R.C.P., F.R.S., Physician to King's College Hospital. 8vo, 5s.
+
+Fistula, Haemorrhoids, Painful Ulcer, Stricture, Prolapsus, and other
+Diseases of the Rectum: Their Diagnosis and Treatment. By WILLIAM
+ALLINGHAM, Surgeon to St. Mark's Hospital for Fistula. Fourth Edition.
+8vo, with Engravings, 10s. 6d.
+
+Pathology of the Urine. Including a Complete Guide to its Analysis. By
+J. L. W. THUDICHUM, M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition, rewritten and
+enlarged. 8vo, with Engravings, 15s.
+
+Student's Primer on the Urine. By J. TRAVIS WHITTAKER, M.D., Clinical
+Demonstrator at the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow. With 16 Plates etched on
+Copper. Post 8vo, 4s. 6d.
+
+Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis. By ALFRED COOPER, F.R.C.S., Surgeon to the
+Lock Hospital, to St. Mark's and the West London Hospitals. 8vo, 10s.
+6d.
+
+Genito-Urinary Organs, including Syphilis: A Practical Treatise on their
+Surgical Diseases, for Students and Practitioners. By W. H. VAN BUREN,
+M.D., and E. L. KEYES, M.D. Royal 8vo, with 140 Engravings, 21s.
+
+Lectures on Syphilis. By HENRY LEE, Consulting Surgeon to St. George's
+Hospital. 8vo, 10s.
+
+Diagnosis and Treatment of Syphilis. By TOM ROBINSON, M.D., Physician to
+St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
+
+Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder and Prostate Gland. Sixth Edition. By
+WALTER J. COULSON, Surgeon to the Lock Hospital and to St. Peter's
+Hospital for Stone. 8vo, 16s.
+
+The Medical Adviser in Life Assurance. By Sir E. H. SIEVEKING, M.D.,
+F.R.C.P. Second Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s.
+
+A Medical Vocabulary: An Explanation of all Terms and Phrases used in
+the various Departments of Medical Science and Practice, their
+Derivation, Meaning, Application, and Pronunciation. By R. G. MAYNE,
+M.D., LL.D. Fifth Edition. Fcap. 8vo, 10s. 6d.
+
+A Dictionary of Medical Science: Containing a concise Explanation of the
+various Subjects and Terms of Medicine, &c. By ROBLEY DUNGLISON, M.D.,
+LL.D. Royal 8vo, 28s.
+
+Medical Education And Practice in all parts of the World. By H. J.
+HARDWICKE, M.D., M.R.C.P. 8vo, 10s.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX.
+
+
+Abercrombie's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Adams (W.) on Clubfoot, 11;
+ on Contraction of the Fingers, 11;
+ on Curvature of the Spine, 11
+
+Alexander's Displacements of the Uterus, 6
+
+Allan on Fever Nursing, 7;
+ Outlines of Infectious Diseases, 7
+
+Allingham on Diseases of the Rectum, 14
+
+Anatomical Remembrancer, 3
+
+
+Balfour's Diseases of the Heart and Aorta, 9
+
+Balkwill's Mechanical Dentistry, 12
+
+Barnes (R.) on Obstetric Operations, 5;
+ on Diseases of Women, 5
+
+Beale's Microscope in Medicine, 8;
+ Slight Ailments, 8;
+ Urinary and Renal Derangements, 14
+
+Bellamy's Surgical Anatomy, 3
+
+Bennet (J. H.) on the Mediterranean, 10;
+ on Pulmonary Consumption, 10
+
+Bentley and Trimen's Medicinal Plants, 7
+
+Bentley's Manual of Botany, 7;
+ Structural Botany, 7;
+ Systematic Botany, 7
+
+Braune's Topographical Anatomy, 3
+
+Brodhurst's Anchylosis, 11;
+ Curvatures, &c., of the Spine, 11;
+ Orthopaedic Surgery, 11
+
+Bryant's Acute Intestinal Strangulation, 9;
+ Practice of Surgery, 11
+
+Bucknill and Tuke's Psychological Medicine, 5
+
+Bulkley's Acne, 13;
+ Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+Burdett's Cottage Hospitals, 4;
+ Pay Hospitals, 4
+
+Burton's Midwifery for Midwives, 6
+
+Butlin's Malignant Disease of the Larynx, 13;
+ Sarcoma and Carcinoma, 13
+
+Buzzard's Diseases of the Nervous System, 9;
+ Peripheral Neuritis, 9
+
+
+Carpenter's Human Physiology, 4
+
+Cayley's Typhoid Fever, 8
+
+Charteris on Health Resorts, 10;
+ Practice of Medicine, 8
+
+Chavers' Diseases of India, 8
+
+Churchill's Face and Foot Deformities, 11
+
+Clouston's Lectures on Mental Diseases, 5
+
+Cobbold on Parasites, 13
+
+Coles' Dental Mechanics, 13
+
+Cooper's Syphilis and Pseudo-Syphilis, 14
+
+Coulson on Diseases of the Bladder, 14
+
+Courty's Diseases of the Uterus, Ovaries, &c., 6
+
+Cripps' Diseases of the Rectum and Anus, 14
+
+Cullingworth's Manual of Nursing, 6;
+ Short Manual for Monthly Nurses, 6
+
+Curling's Diseases of the Testis, 14
+
+
+Dalby's Diseases and Injuries of the Ear, 12
+
+Dalton's Human Physiology, 4
+
+Day on Diseases of Children, 6;
+ on Headaches, 10
+
+Dobell's Lectures on Winter Cough, 8;
+ Loss of Weight, &c., 8;
+ Mont Dore Cure, 8
+
+Domville's Manual for Nurses, 6
+
+Draper's Text Book of Medical Physics, 4
+
+Druitt's Surgeon's Vade-Mecum, 11
+
+Duncan on Diseases of Women, 5;
+ on Sterility in Woman, 5
+
+Dunglison's Medical Dictionary, 14
+
+
+East's Private Treatment of the Insane, 5
+
+Ebstein on Regimen in Gout, 9
+
+Ellis's Diseases of Children, 6
+
+Emmet's Gynaecology, 6
+
+
+Fagge's Principles and Practice of Medicine, 8
+
+Fayrer's Climate and Fevers of India, 7
+
+Fenwick's Chronic Atrophy of the Stomach, 8;
+ Medical Diagnosis, 8;
+ Outlines of Medical Treatment, 8
+
+Flint on Clinical Medicine, 7;
+ on Principles and Practice of Medicine, 7
+
+Flower's Diagrams of the Nerves, 4
+
+Fox's (C. B.) Examinations of Water, Air, and Food, 5
+
+Fox's (T.) Atlas of Skin Diseases, 13
+
+Freyer's Litholopaxy, 14
+
+Frey's Histology and Histo-Chemistry, 4
+
+
+Galabin's Diseases of Women, 6;
+ Manual of Midwifery, 5
+
+Gamgee's Treatment of Wounds and Fractures, 11
+
+Godlee's Atlas of Human Anatomy, 3
+
+Goodhart's Diseases of Children, 6
+
+Gorgas' Dental Medicine, 13
+
+Gowers' Diseases of the Brain, 9;
+ Diseases of the Spinal Cord, 9;
+ Manual of Diseases of Nervous System, 9;
+ Medical Ophthalmoscopy, 9;
+ Pseudo-Hypertrophic Muscular Paralysis, 9
+
+Granville on Gout, 9;
+ on Nerve Vibration and Excitation, 9
+
+Guy's Hospital Formulae, 2;
+ Reports, 2
+
+
+Habershon's Diseases of the Abdomen, 9;
+ Liver, 9;
+ Stomach, 9;
+ Pneumogastric Nerve, 9
+
+Hambleton's What is Consumption?, 8
+
+Hardwicke's Medical Education, 14
+
+Harley on Diseases of the Liver, 9;
+ Inflammations of the Liver, 9
+
+Harris's Dentistry, 13
+
+Harrison's Surgical Disorders of the Urinary Organs, 13
+
+Hartridge's Refraction of the Eye, 12
+
+Harvey's Manuscript Lectures, 3
+
+Heath's Injuries and Diseases of the Jaws, 10;
+ Minor Surgery and Bandaging, 10;
+ Operative Surgery, 10;
+ Practical Anatomy, 3;
+ Surgical Diagnosis, 10
+
+Helm on Short and Long Sight, &c., 11
+
+Higgens' Ophthalmic Out-patient Practice, 11
+
+Hills' Leprosy in British Guiana, 13
+
+Holden's Dissections, 3;
+ Human Osteology, 3;
+ Landmarks, 3
+
+Holmes' (G.) Guide to Use of Laryngoscope, 12;
+ Vocal Physiology and Hygiene, 12
+
+Hood's (D. C.) Diseases and their Commencement, 7
+
+Hood (P.) on Gout, Rheumatism, &c., 9
+
+Hooper's Physician's Vade-Mecum, 8
+
+Hutchinson's Clinical Surgery, 11;
+ Pedigree of Disease, 11;
+ Rare Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+Hyde's Diseases of the Skin, 13
+
+
+James (P.) on Sore Throat, 12
+
+Jessett's Cancer of the Mouth, &c., 13
+
+Jones (C. H.) and Sieveking's Pathological Anatomy, 4
+
+Jones' (H. McN.) Aural Surgery, 12;
+ Atlas of Diseases of Membrana Tympani, 12;
+ Spinal Curvatures, 11
+
+Jordan's Surgical Enquiries, 11
+
+Journal of British Dental Association, 2;
+ Mental Science, 2
+
+
+King's Manual of Obstetrics, 6
+
+
+Lancereaux's Atlas of Pathological Anatomy, 4
+
+Lee (H.) on Syphilis, 14
+
+Lewis (Bevan) on the Human Brain, 4
+
+Liebreich's Atlas of Ophthalmoscopy, 12
+
+Liveing's Megrim, Sick Headache, &c., 9
+
+London Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Lueckes' Hospital Sisters and their Duties, 7
+
+Lund's Hunterian Lectures, 10
+
+
+Macdonald's (J. D.) Examination of Water and Air, 4
+
+Mackenzie on Diphtheria, 12;
+ on Diseases of the Throat and Nose, 12
+
+McLeod's Operative Surgery, 10
+
+MacMunn's Spectroscope in Medicine, 8
+
+Macnamara's Diseases of the Eye, 11;
+ Bones and Joints, 11
+
+Marcet's Southern and Swiss Health-Resorts, 10
+
+Martin's Ambulance Lectures, 10
+
+Mason on Hare-Lip and Cleft Palate, 12;
+ on Surgery of the Face, 12
+
+Mayne's Medical Vocabulary, 14
+
+Middlesex Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Mitchell's Diseases of the Nervous System, 9
+
+Moore's Family Medicine for India, 7;
+ Health-Resorts for Tropical Invalids, 7;
+ Manual of the Diseases of India, 7
+
+Morris' (H.) Anatomy of the Joints, 3
+
+Mouat and Snell on Hospitals, 5
+
+
+Nettleship's Diseases of the Eye, 12
+
+Nunn's Cancer of the Breast, 13
+
+
+Ogston's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Ophthalmic (Royal London) Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Ophthalmological Society's Transactions, 2
+
+Oppert's Hospitals, Infirmaries, Dispensaries, &c., 5
+
+Osborn on Diseases of the Testis, 13;
+ on Hydrocele, 13
+
+Owen's Materia Medica, 7
+
+
+Page's Injuries of the Spine, 11
+
+Parkes' Practical Hygiene, 5
+
+Pavy on Diabetes, 10
+
+Pavy on Food and Dietetics, 10
+
+Pharmaceutical Journal, 2
+
+Pharmacopoeia of the London Hospital, 7
+
+Phillips' Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 7
+
+Pollock's Histology of the Eye and Eyelids, 12
+
+Porritt's Intra-Thoracic Effusion, 8
+
+Purcell on Cancer, 13
+
+Pye-Smith's Syllabus of Physiology, 4
+
+
+Quinby's Notes on Dental Practice, 12
+
+
+Raye's Ambulance Handbook, 10
+
+Reynolds' (J. J.) Diseases of Women, 5;
+ Notes on Midwifery, 5
+
+Richardson's Mechanical Dentistry, 13
+
+Roberts' (C.) Manual of Anthropometry, 5;
+ Detection of Colour-Blindness, 5
+
+Roberts' (D. Lloyd) Practice of Midwifery, 5
+
+Robinson (Tom) on Syphilis, 14
+
+Robinson (W.) on Endemic Goitre or Thyreocele, 12
+
+Ross's Aphasia, 9;
+ Diseases of the Nervous System, 9;
+ Handbook of ditto, 9
+
+Routh's Infant Feeding, 7
+
+Royal College of Surgeons Museum Catalogues, 2
+
+Royle and Harley's Materia Medica, 7
+
+
+St. Bartholomew's Hospital Catalogue, 2
+
+St. George's Hospital Reports, 2
+
+St. Thomas's Hospital Reports, 2
+
+Sansom's Valvular Disease of the Heart, 8
+
+Savage on the Female Pelvic Organs, 6
+
+Sewill's Dental Anatomy, 12
+
+Sharkey's Spasm in Chronic Nerve Disease, 9
+
+Shore's Elementary Practical Biology, 4
+
+Sieveking's Life Assurance, 14
+
+Smith's (E.) Clinical Studies, 6;
+ Diseases in Children, 6;
+ Wasting Diseases of Infants and Children, 6
+
+Smith's (Henry) Surgery of the Rectum, 14
+
+Smith's (Heywood) Dysmenorrhoea, 6
+
+Smith (Priestley) on Glaucoma, 12
+
+Snell's Electro-Magnet in Ophthalmic Surgery, 12
+
+Snow's Clinical Notes on Cancer, 13
+
+Southam's Regional Surgery, 11
+
+Sparks on the Riviera, 10
+
+Squire's Companion to the Pharmacopoeia, 7;
+ Pharmacopoeias of London Hospitals
+
+Starkweather on the Law of Sex, 4
+
+Steavenson's Electricity, 11
+
+Stille and Maisch's National Dispensatory, 7
+
+Stocken's Dental Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 13
+
+Sutton's General Pathology, 4
+
+Swain's Surgical Emergencies, 10
+
+Swayne's Obstetric Aphorisms, 6
+
+
+Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Taylor's Poisons in relation to Medical Jurisprudence, 4
+
+Teale's Dangers to Health, 5
+
+Thin's Cancerous Affections of the Skin, 13
+
+Thomas's Diseases of Women, 6
+
+Thompson's (Sir H.) Calculous Disease, 14;
+ Diseases of the Prostate, 14;
+ Diseases of the Urinary Organs, 14;
+ Lithotomy and Lithotrity, 14;
+ Stricture of the Urethra, 14;
+ Suprapubic Operation, 14;
+ Surgery of the Urinary Organs, 14;
+ Tumours of the Bladder, 14
+
+Thorowgood on Asthma, 8;
+ on Materia Medica and Therapeutics, 7
+
+Thudichum's Pathology of the Urine, 14
+
+Tibbits' Medical and Surgical Electricity, 10;
+ Map of Motor Points, 10;
+ How to use a Galvanic Battery, 10;
+ Electrical and Anatomical Demonstrations, 10
+
+Tilt's Change of Life, 6;
+ Uterine Therapeutics, 6
+
+Tirard's Prescriber's Pharmacopoeia, 7
+
+Tomes' (C. S.) Dental Anatomy, 12
+
+Tomes' (J. and C. S.) Dental Surgery, 12
+
+Tuke's Influence of the Mind upon the Body, 5;
+ Sleep-Walking and Hypnotism, 5
+
+
+Van Buren on the Genito-Urinary Organs, 14
+
+Vintras on the Mineral Waters, &c., of France, 10
+
+Virchow's Post-mortem Examinations, 4
+
+
+Wagstaffe's Human Osteology, 3
+
+Waring's Indian Bazaar Medicines, 8;
+ Practical Therapeutics, 8
+
+Warlomont's Animal Vaccination, 13
+
+Warner's Guide to Medical Case-Taking, 8
+
+Waters' (A. T. H.) Diseases of the Chest, 8
+
+Weaver's Pulmonary Consumption, 8
+
+Wells' (Spencer) Abdominal Tumours, 6;
+ Ovarian and Uterine Tumours, 6
+
+West and Duncan's Diseases of Women, 6
+
+West's (S.) How to Examine the Chest, 8
+
+Whistler's Syphilis of the Larynx, 12
+
+Whittaker's Primer on the Urine, 14
+
+Wilks' Diseases of the Nervous System, 8
+
+Williams' (Roger) Influence of Sex, 4
+
+Wilson's (Sir E.) Anatomists' Vade-Mecum, 3
+
+Wilson's (G.) Handbook of Hygiene, 5;
+ Healthy Life and Dwellings, 5
+
+Wilson's (W. S.) Ocean as a Health-Resort, 10
+
+Wolfe's Diseases and Injuries of the Eye, 11
+
+
+Year Book of Pharmacy, 2
+
+Yeo's (G. F.) Manual of Physiology, 4
+
+Yeo's (J. B.) Contagiousness of Pulmonary Consumption, 8
+
+ * * * * *
+
+The following CATALOGUES issued by J. & A. CHURCHILL will be forwarded
+post free on application:--
+
+A. _J. & A. Churchill's General List of about 650 works on Anatomy,
+Physiology, Hygiene, Midwifery, Materia Medica, Medicine, Surgery,
+Chemistry, Botany, &c., &c., with a complete Index to their Subjects,
+for easy reference._ N.B.--_This List includes_ B, C, & D.
+
+B. _Selection from J. & A. Churchill's General List, comprising all
+recent Works published by them on the Art and Science of Medicine._
+
+C. _J. & A. Churchill's Catalogue of Text Books specially arranged for
+Students._
+
+D. _A selected and descriptive List of J. & A. Churchill's Works on
+Chemistry, Materia Medica, Pharmacy, Botany, Photography, Zoology, the
+Microscope, and other branches of Science._
+
+E. _The Half-yearly List of New Works and New Editions published by J. &
+A. Churchill during the previous six months, together with particulars
+of the Periodicals issued from their House._
+
+ [Sent in January and July of each year to every Medical
+ Practitioner in the United Kingdom whose name and address
+ can be ascertained. A large number are also sent to the
+ United States of America, Continental Europe, India, and the
+ Colonies.]
+
+AMERICA.--_J. & A. Churchill being in constant communication with
+various publishing houses in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, are
+able, notwithstanding the absence of international copyright, to conduct
+negotiations favourable to English Authors._
+
+
+LONDON: 11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET.
+_Pardon & Sons, Printers,] [Wine Office Court, Fleet Street, E.C._
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Schweigger on Squint, by C. Schweigger
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCHWEIGGER ON SQUINT ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35639.txt or 35639.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/6/3/35639/
+
+Produced by Ian Deane, Josephine Paolucci and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/35639.zip b/35639.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..687e62f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35639.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9373a81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #35639 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/35639)