summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/34863-h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '34863-h')
-rw-r--r--34863-h/34863-h.htm5081
-rw-r--r--34863-h/images/bracket1.pngbin0 -> 464 bytes
2 files changed, 5081 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/34863-h/34863-h.htm b/34863-h/34863-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3b3ec1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34863-h/34863-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,5081 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of Conversation, by Andrew P. Peabody.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+ p {margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ text-indent: 1.25em;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+ }
+ img {border: 0;}
+ .tnote {border: dashed 1px; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; padding-bottom: .5em; padding-top: .5em;
+ padding-left: .5em; padding-right: .5em;}
+ ins {text-decoration:none; border-bottom: thin dotted gray;}
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+ }
+ hr { margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+ }
+
+ table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
+
+ body{margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ }
+
+ .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+ } /* page numbers */
+ .copyright {text-align: center; font-size: 70%;}
+ .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%; text-align: justify;}
+
+ .small {font-size: 70%;}
+ .big {font-size: 110%;}
+ .author {font-size: 120%; text-align: center;}
+ .center {text-align: center;}
+ .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+ .chaptertitle {text-align: center; font-size: 110%; font-weight: bold;}
+
+
+ .unindent {margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+ }
+ .right {text-align: right;}
+ .poem {margin-left: 30%; text-align: left;}
+ .poem3 {margin-left: 5%; text-align: left;}
+ .sig {margin-right: 10%; text-align: right;}
+ .footnotes {border: dashed 1px;}
+ .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+ .fnanchor {vertical-align:baseline;
+ position: relative;
+ bottom: 0.33em;
+ font-size: .8em;
+ text-decoration: none;}
+ .hang1 {text-indent: -3em; margin-left: 3em;}
+
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Conversation, by Andrew P. Peabody
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Conversation
+ Its Faults and Its Graces
+
+Author: Andrew P. Peabody
+
+Release Date: January 6, 2011 [EBook #34863]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CONVERSATION ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Emmy, Darleen Dove and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[i]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[iii]</a></span></p>
+<h1>CONVERSATION.</h1>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h1>CONVERSATION;</h1>
+
+<h2>ITS FAULTS<br />
+
+AND<br />
+
+ITS GRACES.</h2>
+
+<div class='center'>COMPILED BY</div>
+
+<div class='author'>ANDREW P. PEABODY.</div>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'><br /><br /><br /><br />&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;<br /><br /><br /><br />
+BOSTON AND CAMBRIDGE:<br />
+JAMES MUNROE AND COMPANY.<br />
+<br />
+M DCCC LV.<br />
+</div>
+
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[iv]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<div class='copyright'>
+Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by<br />
+<span class="smcap">James Munroe and Company</span>,<br />
+In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.<br />
+<br /><br /><br /><br />
+CAMBRIDGE:<br />
+
+THURSTON AND TORRY, PRINTERS.<br />
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[v]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<b>DEDICATED</b><br />
+<br />
+<span class='small'>TO</span><br />
+<br />
+AMERICAN TEACHERS.<br />
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[vii]</a></span></p>
+
+<h2>ADVERTISEMENT.</h2>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">The</span> Compiler has attempted to bring together in
+this little volume the principles which should govern
+conversation among persons of true refinement of
+mind and character, and to point out some of the
+most common and easily besetting vulgarisms occurring
+in the colloquial English of our country and day.
+Part I. is an Address delivered before a Young Ladies'
+School, in Newburyport. Part II. is a Lecture addressed
+to the Literary, Scientific and Mechanics'
+Institution at Reading, England. Part III. is a reprint
+from the fourth English edition of "A Word to
+the Wise, or Hints on the Current Improprieties of
+Expression in Writing and Speaking," by Parry
+Gwynne, a few passages not applicable to the habits
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span>of American society being omitted. Part IV. is composed
+of selections from two little English books,
+entitled, "Never too late to Learn: Mistakes of daily
+occurrence in Speaking, Writing and Pronunciation
+corrected;" and "Common Blunders in Speaking
+<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span>and Writing."</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>PART I.</h2>
+
+<h2>AN ADDRESS</h2>
+
+<div class='center'>DELIVERED BEFORE THE<br />
+
+<span class='big'>NEWBURYPORT FEMALE HIGH SCHOOL,</span><br />
+
+DECEMBER 19, 1846,<br />
+
+BY ANDREW P. PEABODY.<br /><br /><br /></div>
+
+
+<div class='unindent'><span class="smcap">Young Ladies</span>,</div>
+
+<p>You have made me happy by your kind invitation
+to meet you, and to address you on this anniversary.
+A day spent in this room at your annual
+examination, nearly two years ago, was a season of
+privilege and enjoyment not readily to be forgotten.
+I had previously entertained a high regard for your
+instructor. I then learned to know him by his work;
+and, were he not here, I should be glad to extend
+beyond a single sentence my congratulations with you
+that you are his pupils.</p>
+
+<p>I have said that I accepted your invitation with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span>
+gladness. Yet, in preparing myself to meet you, I
+find a degree of embarrassment. This is for you a
+season of recreation,&mdash;a high festival; and I am
+accustomed to use my pen and voice only on grave
+occasions, and for solemn services. I know not how
+to add to your amusement. Should I undertake to
+make sport for you, my awkwardness would give you
+more mirth than my wit. The best that I can do is to
+select some subject that is or ought to be interesting
+to you, and to endeavor to blend a little instruction
+with the gayer and more lively notes of the occasion.
+The lesson shall be neither tediously long nor needlessly
+grave.</p>
+
+<p>I propose to offer you a few hints on <i>conversation</i>.
+How large a portion of life does it fill up! How
+innumerable are its ministries and its uses! It is the
+most refined species of recreation,&mdash;the most sparkling
+source of merriment. It interweaves with a
+never-resting shuttle the bonds of domestic sympathy.
+It fastens the ties of friendship, and runs along the
+golden links of the chain of love. It enriches charity,
+and makes the gift twice blessed. There is, perhaps,
+a peculiar appropriateness in the selection of this
+topic for an address to young ladies; for they do
+more than any other class in the community towards
+establishing the general tone and standard of social
+intercourse. The voices of many of you already, I
+doubt not, strike the key-note of home conversation;
+and you are fast approaching an age when you will<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span>
+take prominent places in general society; will be the
+objects of peculiar regard; and will, in a great measure,
+determine whether the social converse in your respective
+circles shall be vulgar or refined, censorious or
+kindly, frivolous or dignified. It was said by a wise
+man of antiquity,&mdash;"Only give me the making of
+songs for the people, and I care not who makes the
+laws." In our unmusical age and land, talking occupies
+the place which songs did among the melody-loving
+Greeks; and he who could tune the many-voiced
+harp of the social party, need crave no higher
+office or more potent sway.</p>
+
+<p>Permit me now to enumerate some of the characteristics
+of graceful, elegant, and profitable conversation,
+commencing with the lower graces, and passing
+on to the higher.</p>
+
+<p>Let me first beg you, if you would be good talkers,
+to form and fix now, (for you can do this only now,)
+habits of correct and easy pronunciation. The words
+which you now miscall, it will cost you great pains in
+after life to pronounce aright, and you will always be
+in danger of returning inadvertently to your old pronunciation.
+There are two extremes which you ought
+equally to shun. One is that of carelessness; the
+other, that of extreme precision, as if the sound of the
+words uttered were constantly uppermost in the mind.
+This last fault always suggests the idea of vanity and
+pedantry, and is of itself enough to add a deep indigo
+hue to a young lady's reputation.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>One great fault of New England pronunciation is,
+that the work is performed too much by the outer
+organs of speech. The tones of the voice have but
+little depth. Instead of a generous play of the throat
+and lungs, the throat almost closes, and the voice
+seems to be formed in the mouth. It is this that
+gives what is called a <i>nasal</i> tone to the voice, which,
+when denied free range through its lawful avenues,
+rushes in part through the nose. We notice the nasal
+pronunciation in excess here and there in an individual,
+while Englishmen and Southerners observe it
+as a prevailing characteristic of all classes of people
+in the Northern States. Southerners in general are
+much less careful and accurate in pronunciation than
+we are; but they more than compensate for this
+deficiency by the full, round tones in which they utter
+themselves. In our superficial use of the organs of
+speech, there are some consonants which we are
+prone to omit altogether. This is especially the case
+with <i>g</i> in words that end with <i>ing</i>. Nine persons out
+of ten say <i>singin</i> instead of <i>singing</i>. I know some
+public speakers, and many private ones, who never
+pronounce the <i>t</i> in such words as <i>object</i> and <i>prospect</i>.
+Very few persons give the right sound to <i>r</i> final.
+<i>Far</i> is generally pronounced as if it were written <i>fah</i>.
+Now, I would not have the full Hibernian roll of the
+<i>r;</i> but I would have the presence of the letter more
+distinctly recognized, than it often is, even by persons
+of refined and fastidious taste.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Let me next beg you to shun all the ungrammatical
+vulgarisms which are often heard, but which never
+fail to grate harshly on a well-tuned ear. If you
+permit yourselves to use them now, you will never
+get rid of them. I know a venerable and accomplished
+lawyer, who has stood at the head of his
+profession in this State, and has moved in the most
+refined society for half a century, who to this day
+says <i>haint</i> for <i>has not</i>, having acquired the habit
+when a schoolboy. I have known persons who have
+for years tried unsuccessfully to break themselves of
+saying <i>done</i> for <i>did</i>, and <i>you and I</i> for <i>you and me</i>.
+Many well-educated persons, through the power of
+long habit, persist in saying <i>shew</i> for <i>showed</i>, while
+they know perfectly well that they might, with equal
+propriety, substitute <i>snew</i> for <i>snowed;</i> and there is
+not far hence a clergyman, marvellously precise and
+fastidious in his choice of words, who is very apt to
+commence his sermon by saying, "I <i>shew</i> you in a
+recent discourse." A false delicacy has very generally
+introduced <i>drank</i> as the perfect participle of <i>drink</i>,
+instead of <i>drunk</i>, which alone has any respectable
+authority in its favor; and the imperfect tense and
+perfect participle have been similarly confounded in
+many other cases. I know not what grammar you
+use in this school. I trust that it is an old one; for
+some of the new grammars sanction these vulgarisms,
+and in looking over their tables of irregular verbs, I
+have sometimes half expected to have the book dashed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span>
+from my hand by the indignant ghost of Lindley
+Murray. Great care and discretion should be employed
+in the use of the common abbreviations of the
+negative forms of the substantive and auxiliary verbs.
+<i>Can't</i>, <i>don't</i>, and <i><ins title="Transcriber's Note: original reads 'havn't'">haven't</ins></i>, are admissible in rapid conversation
+on trivial subjects. <i>Isn't</i> and <i>hasn't</i> are
+more harsh, yet tolerated by respectable usage. <i>Didn't</i>,
+<i>couldn't</i>, <i>wouldn't</i>, and <i>shouldn't</i>, make as unpleasant
+combinations of consonants as can well be
+uttered, and fall short but by one remove of those
+unutterable names of Polish gentlemen which sometimes
+excite our wonder in the columns of a newspaper.
+<i>Won't</i> for <i>will not</i>, and <i>aint</i> for <i>is not</i> or <i>are
+not</i>, are absolutely vulgar; and <i>aint</i>, for <i>has not</i> or
+<i>have not</i>, is utterly intolerable.</p>
+
+<p>Nearly akin to these offences against good grammar
+is another untasteful practice, into which you are
+probably more in danger of falling, and which is a
+crying sin among young ladies,&mdash;I mean the use of
+exaggerated, extravagant forms of speech,&mdash;saying
+<i>splendid</i> for <i>pretty</i>, <i>magnificent</i> for <i>handsome</i>, <i>horrid</i>
+for <i>very</i>, <i>horrible</i> for <i>unpleasant</i>, <i>immense</i> for <i>large</i>,
+<i>thousands</i> or <i>myriads</i> for any number greater than <i>two</i>.
+Were I to write down, for one day, the conversation
+of some young ladies of my acquaintance, and then to
+interpret it literally, it would imply that, within the
+compass of twelve or fourteen hours, they had met
+with more marvellous adventures and hair-breadth
+escapes, had passed through more distressing experiences,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span>
+had seen more imposing spectacles, had endured
+more fright, and enjoyed more rapture, than
+would suffice for half a dozen common lives. This
+habit is attended with many inconveniences. It deprives
+you of the intelligible use of strong expressions
+when you need them. If you use them all the time,
+nobody understands or believes you when you use
+them in earnest. You are in the same predicament
+with the boy who cried <span class="smcap">wolf</span> so often, when there
+was no wolf, that nobody would go to his relief when
+the wolf came. This habit has also a very bad
+moral bearing. Our words have a reflex influence
+upon our characters. Exaggerated speech makes
+one careless of the truth. The habit of using words
+without regard to their rightful meaning, often leads
+one to distort facts, to misreport conversations, and to
+magnify statements, in matters in which the literal
+truth is important to be told. You can never trust
+the testimony of one who in common conversation is
+indifferent to the import, and regardless of the power,
+of words. I am acquainted with persons whose representations
+of facts always need translation and correction,
+and who have utterly lost their reputation for
+veracity, solely through this habit of overstrained and
+extravagant speech. They do not mean to lie; but
+they have a dialect of their own, in which words bear
+an entirely different sense from that given to them in
+the daily intercourse of discreet and sober people.</p>
+
+<p>In this connection, it may not be amiss to notice a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span>
+certain class of phrases, often employed to fill out
+and dilute sentences, such as, <i>I'm sure</i>,&mdash;<i>I declare</i>,&mdash;<i>That's
+a fact</i>,&mdash;<i>You know</i>,&mdash;<i>I want to know</i>,&mdash;<i>Did
+you ever?</i>&mdash;<i>Well! I never</i>,&mdash;and the like.
+All these forms of speech disfigure conversation,
+weaken the force of the assertions or statements with
+which they are connected, and give unfavorable impressions
+as to the good breeding of the person that
+uses them.</p>
+
+<p>You will be surprised, young ladies, to hear me
+add to these counsels,&mdash;"Above all things, swear
+not at all." Yet there is a great deal of swearing
+among those who would shudder at the very thought
+of being profane. The Jews, who were afraid to use
+the most sacred names in common speech, were
+accustomed to swear by the temple, by the altar, and
+by their own heads; and these oaths were rebuked
+and forbidden by divine authority. I know not why
+the rebuke and prohibition apply not with full force to
+the numerous oaths by <i>goodness</i>, <i>faith</i>, <i>patience</i>, and
+<i>mercy</i>, which we hear from lips that mean to be
+neither coarse nor irreverent, in the schoolroom, street,
+and parlor; and a moment's reflection will convince
+any well-disposed person, that, in the exclamation
+<i>Lor</i>, the cutting off of a single letter from a consecrated
+word can hardly save one from the censure
+and the penalty written in the third commandment.
+I do not regard these expressions as harmless. I believe
+them inconsistent with Christian laws of speech.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span>
+Nor do they accord with the simple, quiet habit of
+mind and tone of feeling which are the most favorable
+to happiness and usefulness, and which sit as
+gracefully on gay and buoyant youth as on the sedateness
+of maturer years. The frame of mind in which
+a young lady says, in reply to a question, <i>Mercy! no</i>,
+is very different from that which prompts the simple,
+modest <i>no</i>. Were there any room for doubt, I should
+have some doubt of the truth of the former answer;
+for the unnatural, excited, fluttered state of mind implied
+in the use of the oath, might indicate either an
+unfitness to weigh the truth, or an unwillingness to
+acknowledge it.</p>
+
+<p>In fine, transparency is an essential attribute of all
+graceful and becoming speech. Language ought to
+represent the speaker's ideas, and neither more nor
+less. Exclamations, needless expletives, unmeaning
+extravagances, are as untasteful as the streamers of
+tattered finery which you sometimes see fluttering
+about the person of a dilapidated belle. Let your
+thoughts be as strong, as witty, as brilliant, as you
+can make them; but never seek to atone for feeble
+thought by large words, or to rig out foolish conceits
+in the spangled robe of genuine wit. Speak as you
+think and feel; and let the tongue always be an honest
+interpreter to the heart.</p>
+
+<p>But it is time that we passed to higher considerations.
+There are great laws of duty and religion
+which should govern our conversation; and the divine<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span>
+Teacher assures us that even for our idle words we
+are accountable to Him who has given us the power
+of speech. Now, I by no means believe that there is
+any principle of our religion which frowns upon wit
+or merriment, or forbids playful speech at fit seasons
+and within due limits. The very fact that the Almighty
+has created the muscles which produce the
+smile and the laugh, is a perpetual rebuke to those
+who would call all laughter madness, and all mirth
+folly. Amusement, in its time and place, is a great
+good; and I know of no amusement so refined, so
+worthy an intellectual being, as that conversation
+which is witty and still kind, playful, yet always reverent,
+which recreates from toil and care, but leaves
+no sting, and violates no principle of brotherly love or
+religious duty.</p>
+
+<p>Evil speaking, slander, detraction, gossip, scandal,
+are different names for one of the chief dangers to be
+guarded against in conversation; and you are doing
+much towards defending yourselves against it by the
+generous mental culture which you enjoy in this seminary.
+The demon of slander loves an empty house.
+A taste for scandal betrays a vacant mind. Furnish
+your minds, then, by useful reading and study, and
+by habits of reflection and mental industry, that you
+may be able to talk about subjects as well as about
+people,&mdash;about events too long past or too remote to
+be interwoven with slander. But, if you must talk
+about people, why not about their good traits and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span>
+deeds? The truest ingenuity is that which brings
+hidden excellences to light; for virtue is in her very
+nature modest and retiring, while faults lie on the surface
+and are detected with half an eye.</p>
+
+<p>You will undoubtedly be careful to have your words
+always just and kind, if you will only take a sufficiently
+thorough view of the influence of your habits
+of conversation, both in the formation of your own
+characters and in determining the happiness of others.
+But how low an estimate do many of us make of the
+power of the tongue! How little account we are apt
+to take of our words! Have we not all at times said
+to ourselves, "Oh! it is only a word!" when it may
+have been sharp as a drawn sword, have given more
+pain than a score of blows, and done more harm than
+our hands could have wrought in a month? Why is
+it that the slanderer and the tale-bearer regard themselves
+as honest and worthy people, instead of feeling
+that they are accursed of God and man? It is because
+they deal in evil words only, and they consider words
+as mere nought. Why is it that the carping tongue,
+which filches a little from everybody's good name,
+can hardly utter itself without a sneer, and makes
+every fair character its prey, thinks better of itself
+than a petty pilferer would? It is because by long,
+though baseless prescription, the tongue has claimed
+for itself a license denied to every other member and
+faculty.</p>
+
+<p>But, in point of fact, your words not only express,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span>
+but help create, your characters. Speech gives
+definiteness and permanence to your thoughts and
+feelings. The unuttered thought may fade from the
+memory,&mdash;may be chased away by better thoughts,&mdash;may,
+indeed, hardly be a part of your own mind;
+for, if suggested from without, and met without a welcome,
+and with disapproval and resistance, it is not
+yours. But by speech you adopt thoughts, and the
+voice that utters them is as a pen that engraves them
+indelibly on the soul. If you can suppress unkind
+thoughts, so that, when they rise in your breast, and
+mount to your very lips, you leave them unuttered,
+you are not on the whole unkind,&mdash;your better nature
+has the supremacy. But if these wrong feelings
+often find utterance, though you call it hasty utterance,
+there is reason to fear that they flow from a
+bitter fountain within.</p>
+
+<p>Consider, also, how large a portion speech makes up
+of the lives of all. It occupies the greater part of the
+waking hours of many of us; while express acts of a
+moral bearing, compared with our words, are rare
+and few. Indeed, in many departments of duty,
+words are our only possible deeds,&mdash;it is by words
+alone that we can perform or violate our duty. Many
+of the most important forms of charity are those of
+speech. Alms-giving is almost the only expression of
+charity of which the voice is not the chief minister;
+and alms, conferred in silent coldness, or with chiding
+or disdainful speech, freeze the spirit, though they<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span>
+may warm the body. Speech, too, is the sole medium
+of a countless host of domestic duties and observances.
+There are, indeed, in every community many whose
+only activity seems to be in words. There are many
+young ladies, released from the restraints of school,
+and many older ladies, with few or no domestic burdens,
+with no worldly avocation and no taste for reading,
+whose whole waking life, either at their own
+homes or from house to house, is given to the exercise,
+for good or evil, of the tongue,&mdash;that unruly
+member. And how blessed might they make that
+exercise,&mdash;for how many holy ministries of love,
+sympathy, and charity might it suffice,&mdash;how many
+wounds might it prevent or heal,&mdash;did they only
+believe and feel that they were writing out their own
+characters in their daily speech! But too many of
+them forget this. So long as they do not knowingly
+and absolutely lie, they feel no responsibility for their
+words. They deem themselves virtuous, because
+they refrain from vices to which they have not the
+shadow of a temptation; but carp, backbite, and carry
+ill reports from house to house, with an apostle's zeal
+and a martyr's devotedness. To say nothing of the
+social effect of such a life, is not the tongue thus
+employed working out spiritual death for the soul in
+whose service it is busy? I know of no images too
+vile to portray such a character. The dissection of a
+slanderer's or talebearer's heart would present the
+most loathsome specimen of morbid anatomy conceivable.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span>
+It is full of the most malignant poison.
+Its life is all mean, low, serpent-like,&mdash;a life that
+cannot bear the light, but finds all its nourishment and
+growth in darkness. Were these foul and odious
+forms of speech incapable of harming others,&mdash;did
+human reptiles of this class creep about in some outward
+guise, in which they could be recognized by all,
+and their words be taken for what they are worth,
+and no more,&mdash;still I would beg them, for their own
+sakes, not to degrade God's image, in which they
+were created, into the likeness of a creeping thing; I
+would entreat them not to be guilty of the meanest
+and most miserable of all forms of spiritual suicide; I
+would beseech them, if they are determined to sell
+their souls, to get some better price for them than the
+scorn and dread of all whose esteem is worth having.</p>
+
+<p>In this connection, we ought to take into account
+the very large class of literally idle words. How
+many talk on unthinkingly and heedlessly, as if the
+swift exercise of the organs of speech were the great
+end of life! The most trivial news of the day, the
+concerns of the neighborhood, the floating gossip,
+whether good-natured or malignant, dress, food, frivolous
+surmises, paltry plans, vanities too light to remain
+an hour upon the memory,&mdash;these are the sole staple
+of what too many call conversation; and many are
+the young people who are training themselves in the
+use of speech for no higher or better purpose. But
+such persons have the threatened judgment visibly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span>
+following their idle speech. Their minds grow superficial
+and shallow. They constantly lose ground, if
+they ever had any, as intellectual and moral beings.
+Such speech makes a person, of however genteel
+training, coarse and vulgar, and that not only in character,
+but even in voice and manners, and with sad
+frequency it obliterates traits of rich loveliness and
+promise. The merely idle tongue is also very readily
+betrayed into overt guilt. One cannot indulge in
+idle, reckless talk, without being implicated in all the
+current slander and calumny, and acquiring gradually
+the envious and malignant traits of a hackneyed tale-bearer.
+And the person who, in youth, can attract
+the attention and win the favor of those of little reflection
+by flippant and voluble discourse, will encounter
+in the very same circles neglect, disesteem, and dislike,
+before the meridian of life is passed; for it takes
+all the charms that youth, sprightliness, and high animal
+spirits can furnish, to make an idle tongue fascinating
+or even endurable.</p>
+
+<p>Let me ask you now to consider for a moment the
+influence which we exert in conversation upon the
+happiness or misery of others. It is not too much to
+say, that most of us do more good or harm in this
+way than in all other forms beside. Look around
+you,&mdash;take a survey of whatever there is of social or
+domestic unhappiness in the families to which you
+belong, or among your kindred and acquaintance.
+Nine tenths of it can be traced to no other cause than<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span>
+untrue, unkind, or ungoverned speech. A mere harsh
+word, repented of the next moment,&mdash;how great a
+fire can it kindle! The carrying back and forth of
+an idle tale, not worth an hour's thought, will often
+break up the closest intimacies. From every slanderous
+tongue you may trace numerous rills of bitterness,
+winding round from house to house, and separating
+those who ought to be united in the closest friendship.
+Could persons, who, with kind hearts, are yet hasty
+in speech, number up, at the close of a day, the feelings
+that they had wounded, and the uncomfortable
+sensations that they had caused, they would need no
+other motive to study suavity of manner, and to seek
+for their words the rich unction of a truly charitable
+spirit. Then, too, how many are the traits of suspicion,
+jealousy, and heart-burning, which go forth
+from every day's merely idle words, vain and vague
+surmises, uncharitable inferences and conjectures!</p>
+
+<p>These thoughts point to the necessity of religion as
+the guiding, controlling element in conversation. All
+conversation ought to be religious. Not that I would
+have persons always talking on what are commonly
+called religious subjects. Let these be talked of at
+fitting times and places, but never obtrusively brought
+forward or thrust in. But cannot common subjects be
+talked of religiously? Cannot we converse about our
+plans, our amusements, our reading, nay, and our
+neighbors too, and no sacred name be introduced, and
+yet the conversation be strictly religious? Yes,&mdash;if<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span>
+throughout the conversation we own the laws of honesty,
+frankness, kind construction, and sincere benevolence,&mdash;if
+our speech be pure, true, gentle, dignified,&mdash;if
+it seek or impart information that either party
+needs,&mdash;if it cherish friendly feeling,&mdash;if it give us
+kinder affections towards others,&mdash;if it bring our
+minds into vigorous exercise,&mdash;nay, if it barely amuse
+us, but not too long, and if the wit be free from coarseness
+and at no one's expense. But we should ever
+bear it in mind, that our words are all uttered in the
+hearing of an unseen Listener and Judge. Could we
+keep this in remembrance, there would be little in our
+speech that need give us shame or pain. But that
+half hour spent in holding up to ridicule one who has
+done you no harm,&mdash;that breathless haste to tell the
+last piece of slander,&mdash;you would not want to remember
+in your evening prayer. From the flippant,
+irresponsible, wasteful gossip, in which so much time
+is daily lost, you could not with a safe conscience
+look up and own an Almighty presence.</p>
+
+<p>Young ladies, my subject is a large one, and
+branches out into so many heads, that, were I to say
+all that I should be glad to say, the setting sun would
+stop me midway. But it is time for me to relieve
+your patience. Accept, with these fragmentary hints,
+my cordial congratulations and good wishes. Life
+now smiles before you, and beckons you onward.
+Heaven grant that your coming days may be even
+happier than you hope! To make them so is within<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span>
+your own power. They will not be cloudless. If
+you live long, disappointments and sorrows must
+come. There will be steep and rough passages in
+the way of life. But there is a Guide, in whose footprints
+you may climb the steep places without weariness,
+and tread the rough ground without stumbling.
+Add to your mental culture faith in Him, and the self-consecration
+of the Christian heart. Then even trials
+will make you happier. When clouds are over your
+way, rays from Heaven will struggle through their
+fissures, and fringe their edges. Your path will be
+onward and upward, ever easier, ever brighter. On
+that path may your early footsteps be planted, that
+the beautiful bloom of your youth may not wither and
+perish, but may ripen for a heavenly harvest!<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span></p>
+<h2>PART II.</h2>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>A LECTURE</h2>
+
+<div class='center'><span class='small'>DELIVERED AT READING, ENGLAND, DECEMBER 19, 1854,</span><br />
+
+BY FRANCIS TRENCH.</div>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">We</span> are all of us more or less apt to overlook that
+which is continually going on around us. We omit
+to make it a matter of inquiry, and reserve our attention
+for that which is more rare, although of far less
+importance. What is it, for instance, which, after a
+course of long, sultry heat,&mdash;when the sun, day by
+day, has blazed in the sky above,&mdash;what is it, I ask,
+which has still preserved the verdure and freshness of
+all vegetable life? Surely it has been nothing else
+than the dew of heaven, gently, regularly, plenteously
+falling, as each evening closed in. Nevertheless,
+how little is it thought of,&mdash;how little are its benefits
+acknowledged! But when the clouds gather speedily
+and darkly, and perhaps unexpectedly, when the sense
+of coolness spreads once more through the parched<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span>
+atmosphere, when abundance of rain all at once descends,
+then all observe the change, all notice the
+beneficial results; yet perhaps they are trifling indeed
+compared with those of the nightly and forgotten dew,
+which has never ceased to fall, week by week, or
+even month by month, during the course of the
+drought. I feel no doubt that it will be acknowledged
+how it is the same, the very same, in all things calling
+for our observation. So, therefore, it is regarding
+conversation, as a thing of every day. We flock to
+hear and admire some mighty orator's address, but
+we think little of and little appreciate that daily, hourly
+thing which is our subject now,&mdash;I mean conversation.
+But I leave you to judge which has the most
+effect on our general interest, as social creatures,&mdash;which,
+in the long run, has most to do with the pleasure
+and the profit of all human intercourse.</p>
+
+<p>Having made this claim on your attention, I would
+now observe that the subject is one of so wide a scope
+that I can do little more than present you with a few
+thoughts, which I have noted down as they have risen
+to my own mind, upon it. And I trust that they will
+prove not entirely unacceptable, though well indeed
+aware that the topic is one to which it must be very
+difficult indeed to do any justice.</p>
+
+<p>But I must first try to meet one objection, for which
+I am quite prepared, namely, that conversation is not
+a fit subject for a lecture at all, but should be considered
+as too independent and free to have any<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span>
+rules, principles, or guidance applied to it. This,
+however, is indeed a fallacy, and may briefly be exposed
+by a few such questions as those I am about to
+ask. What should be more free than the sword of
+the soldier in the battle-day?&mdash;than the pencil of the
+artist at the mountain side?&mdash;or than the poet's song
+in its upward flight? Yet who would condemn the
+use of the drill, or the study of perspective, or the
+rules of poetic art? No less untenable is it to maintain
+that conversation can be subject to no principle,
+rule, or review, without checking its free and unfettered
+range. Cowper has simply summed up the
+whole truth:&mdash;</p>
+
+<div class='poem'>
+"Though conversation in its better part<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">May be esteemed a gift, and not an art;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Yet much depends, as in the tiller's toil,</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">On culture and the sowing of the soil."</span><br />
+</div>
+
+<div class='unindent'>Nor shall I venture to suggest any measures which
+I do not believe already well sanctioned, well honored,
+and well practised too, even by many who have never
+yet thought of classifying them at all. But these I
+shall freely give, as my duty is, at your summons this
+night.</div>
+
+<p>Conversation may be termed or defined as "the
+exchange and communication, by word, of that which
+is passing in the inward mind and heart." And none
+of all known creatures, except man, has this peculiar
+gift. The animal tribes approach us and even surpass<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span>
+us in many of their physical powers and capacities.
+As to their capacities in the five senses of the body, I
+conceive that, generally speaking, it is so; but none
+of them converse, like man, in expressive words, however
+they may and do comprehend one another through
+inferior means. Homer has therefore defined our
+race as "word-dividing men." And surely such a
+capacity or power is not bestowed on us unaccompanied
+by an obligation and a claim to give due
+diligence how we do and how we may employ it.
+Never to act thus is surely an undue disregard of our
+endowment,&mdash;a virtual depreciation and contempt of
+that which is at once among the most needful, the
+most useful, and, at the same time, most ornamental
+gifts of God to mankind.</p>
+
+<p>As, then, it is said of real wisdom, that first "it is
+pure," or free from error and wrong, so too, first of
+all, right and proper conversation must be free from
+everything evidently and positively inconsistent with
+our duty towards God and man. It has ever been
+well said that we must be just before we are generous.
+The one attribute is essential and indispensable in
+every transaction of life. The acts and deeds connected
+with the other are comparatively undefined
+and indefinable. So it is essential, it is indispensable,
+that our conversation, from our own choice and deliberate
+aim, should be utterly free from all things
+irreverent to God and injurious to our fellow-creatures.
+God's name must never be taken in vain.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span>
+God's Word, and divine things generally, must never
+be treated with any levity. No sentence must come
+forth from our lips having any tendency to undermine
+or subvert the principles and practices of true religion.
+These are among the mere dues and obligations to
+Him who gives us the faculty of speech, and enables
+us to interchange conversation with our fellows; and,
+beyond all doubt, hour after hour of silence and
+reserve would be infinitely better&mdash;more to be desired
+by any Christian&mdash;than the most entertaining and
+most captivating talk of a witty but unprincipled man.
+And so too, exactly, with regard to our fellow-creatures.
+They too have an absolute claim on us, that
+we should resolutely keep to the grand rule of speaking
+to them only such things as will do them no hurt,&mdash;no
+hurt to their minds, no hurt to their feelings, no
+hurt to their best and true and everlasting interest.
+As the words of one lead many to heaven and joy, so
+too the words of another lead many to hell and woe.
+Better, again I say, would it be for you to be silent as
+a dumb man than to indulge carelessly and wickedly
+in any such utterances. He who does it is a cruel
+enemy of his fellow-creatures, however popular, however
+able and attractive he may be.</p>
+
+<p>Thus much with regard to conversation&mdash;on the
+negative side. Thus much as to that nature and
+character of which it must <i>not</i> be, under any circumstances.
+And, having no intention to make my present
+address in any degree of that more solemn and absolutely<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span>
+serious kind, which it is my privilege so often
+to employ in my profession, I will only add here that,
+having now seen what it is essential and indispensable
+for us to shun in conversation, so again, to aim at
+pleasing God and serving our fellow-creatures is not
+less needful,&mdash;not less essential, as the one grand
+object and scope with which at all times we should
+use and interchange it. I am sure you will all admit
+that I could not rightly proceed without laying down
+this broad, this sure foundation. On it we may build
+the lighter superstructure; but, without laying it down,
+I could not conscientiously proceed. Nay, farther, I
+feel equally convinced that many would perceive at
+once the deficiency, and regret it too, were I to adopt
+any other course. Conversation, to be worthy of the
+name at all, is not child's play. It must be dealt
+with, if considered at all, as an important and substantial
+thing, not as the mere toy wherewith to trifle
+and sport each day and hour till we pass away to
+meet that judgment where our Lord has himself declared,&mdash;"By
+your words ye shall be justified, and
+by your words ye shall be condemned."</p>
+
+<p>The subject may now branch out into many and
+various directions. To make a choice is the only
+difficulty. One of these may lead us to notice that,
+in all conversation, special attention should ever be
+paid to the feelings of all present. Every subject
+should be studiously avoided likely to give needless
+pain, and perhaps, as it were, open the sluice-gate<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span>
+through which other observations might more plentifully
+flow in from others of the company, painful to
+one or more in the circle. Nothing, of course, will
+teach this so much as true kindness and true sympathy
+of heart; and, if this be wanting, offences of
+this kind will continually abound,&mdash;yes, I am sorry
+to say, will sometimes be studiously and intentionally
+committed. But even the most loving and most kindly
+spirit will do well to be very watchful on this point,
+seeking to exercise all judgment and tact in the
+matter; and even beyond this a beautiful art is sometimes
+to be witnessed,&mdash;happy indeed are they who
+possess it,&mdash;which turns and leads away the general
+strain of talk, and that often with unperceived skill,
+when approaching dangerous ground, or perhaps
+already beginning to grieve or disturb another.</p>
+
+<p>Among injurious practices in talk, the following
+may perhaps be enumerated:&mdash;an overbearing vehemence,
+challenging assertions, cold indifference to the
+statements of others, a love of argumentation, an inclination
+to regard fair liberty of mutual address as
+undue license, pressure on another to express more
+than he desires, all personalities which would be forbidden
+by the royal law of speaking unto others as
+you would like to be spoken to yourself. These and
+many more transgressions, in our address one to another,
+are not only of a grave, but also of a very
+evident kind, and therefore on them, perhaps, there is
+less need to dwell.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Others are more subtle,&mdash;more elude the grasp of
+ordinary observation. All social life, and even all
+family life, if rightly carried on, requires not only
+mutual forbearance in talk, but mutual sympathy too,
+mutual encouragement one from the other. In families
+and in society we find the old, the young; the busy
+and those comparatively unemployed; the studious or
+the literary, and those whose tastes are completely
+different; people occupied in various professions and
+trades; politicians and statesmen; soldiers and sailors;
+young men and women reared up at home, with young
+men and women reared up at schools and public institutions;
+travellers acquainted with divers parts of the
+globe, and those who never have quitted their own
+land; men of the city and men of the field;&mdash;in a
+word, persons and characters almost as various in the
+aspect of their inward taste as the very features which
+each countenance wears,&mdash;for I may venture to say
+that no two persons think or feel exactly and altogether
+alike. Now, whenever there is such a thing as opinion,
+and whenever there is such a thing as feeling (which
+is the case in all members of families, and in all
+members of society with whom you can possibly live
+or be thrown), there at once is, or there arises, an
+immediate claim for a kind and proper treatment of
+these opinions and of these feelings. They may not
+be your own, they may be utterly different from your
+own, but that has nothing to do with the question.
+As a general rule, every one present has no less right<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span>
+to them than you have to yours. You had better go,
+like Shakspeare's Timon, altogether out of the concourse
+of your fellow-creatures, if you cannot realize
+this truth and apply it too. And it is in conversation
+that you will ever give the chief proofs and evidences
+whether you do so or not. In it there must be nothing
+despotic,&mdash;nothing to give any present the idea that
+you have any right to decide what his opinions, what
+his tastes, what his habits, what his pursuits, should
+be. You will, of course, not misunderstand me here,&mdash;not
+forget that I am supposing each opinion, each
+taste, each habit and pursuit, as, on the face of it,
+allowable and innocent, although not yours. I repeat
+it, there must be no despotism in society. Equality
+must prevail as a general rule; I say a general rule,
+because there are, no doubt, certain seasons and times
+when the intercourse of social and of family life must
+partake of that special character which is adapted to
+the various relationships of man. The parent must,
+at times, simply direct the child by his words. The
+teacher, authoritatively, must instruct the pupil. The
+master or employer must tell the employed what to
+do. And occasionally, in society, the rule above laid
+down will, by general consent, lie in abeyance, if it
+may be so expressed. And, on certain subjects,&mdash;I
+mean those whereon we are ourselves ignorant, but
+others in our company are highly informed,&mdash;we
+may be content to be just listeners, merely demonstrating
+that sympathy and interest adequate to keep<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span>
+up the flow of instruction from another's lips. But
+intercourse of this kind scarcely can be termed conversation;
+and when circumstances like these occur
+in social and family life, they must be directed by
+other rules not altogether applicable to our present
+subject. Now, to enter with full sympathy into the
+claims of all present in society for this equal right of
+interchanged sentiment, and to show this feeling at
+times by patient forbearance and at other times by
+manifest appreciation of that which others say, is no
+slight grace and gift. And here the various lessons
+on the subject, which experience or observation has
+taught, must be brought into play; and the information
+in any way gained as to the various feelings,
+habits, and tastes ordinarily entertained by people of
+different ages, different professions, and different characters,
+must be judiciously applied. Nor will this, in
+the least, spoil free and fair discussion of any topic.
+On the contrary, it will promote it. And thus that
+principle will be rightly maintained which I have
+endeavored to lay down and commend, viz., that
+when any special opinion, feeling, or taste is expressed
+in society,&mdash;I mean, of course, in a proper and legitimate
+way,&mdash;it should always be treated by all
+present with that measure of respect which each one
+would wish exercised towards himself for his own
+personal views. Just in proportion as men are boorish,
+coarse, and unsocial, in the true and extensive sense
+of the word, will they transgress here. Yes, even<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span>
+put together one, ungainly tempered, from his field,
+and another of the same character from his shop or
+counting house, and very likely not five minutes will
+elapse before one or the other will say something to
+disparage those habits and tastes with which he himself
+happens to be not conversant. There ensues discord
+and disseverance, or, it may be, silence and separation.
+But, on the other hand, just in proportion as
+you are enabled to unite yourself with others through
+your demeanor and words,&mdash;not, of course, hypocritically
+or obsequiously, but from real sympathy
+with all the innocent tastes and engagements of our
+fellow-creatures,&mdash;just, I say, in proportion as you
+are enabled to do this, will your intercourse with them,
+in the way of conversation, be of that kind at which
+we should aim. None will be afraid of your indulging
+in rebuffs, or ridicule, or depreciation. None will
+meet from you a cold, heartless, and repulsive indifference.
+To you, and before you, the flower<a name="FNanchor_A_1" id="FNanchor_A_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor">[A]</a> of
+each human heart (if I may so speak) will then have
+a tendency to open and expand its varied forms and
+hues, instead of retaining them all closed and shut
+up; and many, many thoughts will be expressed to
+you and before you which will never be heard, or at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span>
+all events rarely, indeed, by those of a sneering, unsympathizing,
+hard, and ungenial spirit. Thus you
+will be known, or rather felt, instinctively felt, as one
+who will do nothing to chill, but, on the contrary,
+much to encourage that free spirit (in the best sense
+of the word) which should mark and imbue all social
+intercourse deserving the name at all; and you will
+be welcomed by all who can appreciate good taste,
+good tact, and (I will add) good feeling too,&mdash;for
+that is the chief spring of all such conduct; and you
+will be enabled to receive and communicate much
+pleasure and profit too, wheresover you may go.</p>
+
+<p>A word here may not be inappropriate as to what
+is sometimes called "drawing a person out"&mdash;<i>i. e.</i>
+leading another to tell you, or any company assembled
+in your presence, what they know, what they have
+seen, what they feel, what, in a word, they are able
+to communicate, if so disposed and led. Now, this
+drawing out is a very delicate affair. When successfully
+done, it is most valuable. When the attempt
+proves unsuccessful, you are very likely to lose or
+interfere with the very object in view. Questioning
+of all kinds,&mdash;up from that on the simplest topic, and
+with a purpose of the simplest kind, to that involving
+the most important results,&mdash;questioning, I say, of all
+kinds, requires judgment and tact. Many persons
+much err in this department of address. Some err
+by asking about matters on which it is quite clear that
+they have no real feeling and concern. Some err by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span>
+demands as to your own personal proceedings, wherewith
+they have no connection. Some, again, err by
+putting questions, not wrongly or inappropriately, but
+merely too many at a time, or in too rapid a succession.
+This scarcely can be called conversation at all,&mdash;and,
+generally speaking, (though I do not deny
+that there are exceptions, which will at once recur to
+the intelligent,) yes, generally speaking, is most unsatisfactory.
+And the reason, if we analyze the
+matter, is, that all the statements, or observations, or
+call them what you will, proceed, under such circumstances,
+from one of the parties engaged. It is not
+reciprocal; it is not mutually communicated with due
+equality of interchanged thought. You will at once
+perceive that this must be detrimental; and I would
+suggest that when you may observe the damage which
+is thus done to conversation, you should seek at once
+to put the discourse on a better plan,&mdash;to shift it, as
+it were, on a better line for good progress. And that
+may sometimes be done by putting a question to
+those who question you, or even more, by making the
+number of questions on each side, in some measure,
+to correspond. This, of course, must not be done
+harshly or abruptly, nor so as to give the very least
+impression that you yourself desire to withhold and
+draw in; but it may often be advantageously done;
+and you will thus afford to another the natural and fit
+means of telling you something, as a response for that
+which you tell him. Then true conversation will<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span>
+begin; then the due interchange of expression, which
+alone merits the name; then each party becomes
+rightly placed, and the intercourse will improve almost
+instantaneously.</p>
+
+<p>But if, in these very commonest forms of our
+mutual address, it is not an easy thing to put questions
+well,&mdash;neither too many, nor in their wrong place,&mdash;then
+we may be well assured that it is more difficult
+still when the object, expressly, is to lead on
+another, gifted perhaps in many ways, or having perhaps
+some special thing to tell, unknown to you or
+others present. And yet what a valuable art this is!
+Much is lost in society by incapacity for its due exercise.
+Much is gained by skill in its employment.
+But many reasons concur to render it very difficult.
+The following may be mentioned among many others.
+Some are full of matter, but shy or reserved. Some
+are unaware of the deep interest which certain things,
+well known to them, would have for others, if they
+would communicate them; (in illustration of this, I
+may perhaps quote scientific men, travellers, those
+who have led strange and peculiar lives.) Some are
+too modest to put themselves in any prominent light.
+Others are too proud so to do, lest they should fail in
+winning full attention to their words. Some are jaded
+and worn with previous hours of intellectual toil, and
+the current of their thoughts is still flowing on in a
+channel of its own. Some are laboring under a kind
+of awe of one or more persons in the company.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span>
+Some are young, and scarcely seem to realize or
+know how acceptable are the thoughts and fresh expressions
+of youth to those of maturer years. Others
+are afraid of being too professional in their remarks.
+Others are indolent in the use of their tongue and
+utterance. And numerous other causes might be
+mentioned, which sadly interfere with the full, free,
+and general flow of discourse or conversation. And
+yet, at the same time, there may be rich stores in the
+assembly,&mdash;much, very much, to communicate,&mdash;something,
+at least, in each either to please, or inform
+and improve,&mdash;something perhaps in every one present
+which, if told and expressed to those around him,
+would add and contribute no slight nor unprized contribution
+to the common stock. But how to elicit it&mdash;there
+is the difficulty. Nevertheless, very much
+may be done by tact and kindness, by animation and
+by cordiality, by watching and waiting for fit opportunities,
+by that appreciation of each one in the circle
+which will encompass and arouse all, as it were, with
+a kind of electric chain,&mdash;by a constant and deliberate
+aim to converse yourself at the time when it may
+be requisite, and willingly to lapse into silence and
+the background when another takes up the subject.
+And, although it is a measure which requires no little
+taste and moderation in its use, still it is sometimes
+not only very graceful, but very effectual too, if you
+will open out on some few personal topics which may
+concern yourself, and thus win a response from others<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span>
+present, who may personally know or have personally
+gone through that which you and others in the company
+would desire, and rightly desire, to hear opened
+out without any reserve.</p>
+
+<p>In order, again, to promote conversation of a superior
+sort, endeavor must be made to expand and enlarge
+its bounds to the very utmost. It should be of a comprehensive
+kind,&mdash;not the gossip of some narrow set,
+not a mere comment on the persons and affairs of any
+one locality, not a wearisome and dull repetition of
+things already, perhaps long, familiar to all present.
+I repeat, it should be comprehensive,&mdash;brought forward,
+as it were, from a full treasury of "things new
+and old," and coined into various sums, larger for
+such occasions as may need, and small&mdash;yes, even
+to the smallest&mdash;for the fit use and time. It should
+be formed of various materials, of that which has
+been seen, and heard, and read. A monotonous character
+is fatal to it. At one time it should arouse and
+awaken,&mdash;at another it should calm and soothe. At
+one time it should lead into deep and grave questions,&mdash;at
+another it should play lightly over the surface of
+things. At one time it may touch the spirit of the
+hearer, almost into tears,&mdash;at another it may raise
+the full freedom of laughter and mirth. At one time
+it may be addressed to all within the convenient reach
+of your words,&mdash;at another to one listening ear. If
+possible, it should touch on many tastes, on many
+places, on various interests, giving to each present<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span>
+(however different each taste and character) the best
+and fairest opening for a share in the circling talk,
+which opportunity every one, at fit occasion and turn,
+should be willing to embrace, and thus to render his
+or her social dues to those who freely and fairly contribute
+theirs. No one, on the other hand, should
+seek dominion, nor ever two or three, over the remainder.
+Again, conversation should never be allowed
+so to fall into separate or little knots, that one here or
+one there should remain alone or excluded altogether.
+It should be carried on in appropriate tones of voice.
+They should be somewhat raised, or rather, I would
+say, strengthened for the old and for those who are a
+little deaf, of whom there are many. This, however,
+not too obviously; not to remind any of infirmity.
+They should be quick, firm, and spirited for those in
+middle age, with their faculties in full strength. They
+should be somewhat gentler to the young, lest they be
+at all checked; and somewhat slower, that they may
+have more time and means to frame their own answer.
+For which the reason is, that as "practice makes perfect"
+in all things, so they, whose practice has, of
+course, been less than their seniors', need more time
+to make up for the want of it, even in conversation.
+At all times discourse is liable to alternations as to its
+interest and life. Expect this, and even should it
+become at any moment what is called dull, or even
+should an awkward pause and silence come on, do not
+seem to notice it. This will only make it worse.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span>
+Rather try yourself to gather up the broken thread, or
+to introduce some new matter. Every one should
+avoid bringing forward or needlessly dwelling on any
+topic whatsoever likely to affect any others present
+with any unfavorable reminiscences. The wealthy
+will avoid, as a general rule, allusions to their property
+and wealth before any persons who, although their
+equals in society, are known to be of poor and inadequate
+estate. The healthy and the vigorous of frame
+will not forget that others are invalids; those free as
+air in the disposition of their time, that others have
+but very little, and that with difficulty spared; the
+quick and intelligent, that others are more slow in
+apprehension; those of hardy spirit, well strung and
+braced, that others are nervous, sensitive, and tried
+by words, tones, gestures, and expressions, which
+would not try, nor vex, or affect them in the least
+degree. But what tact is requisite in all this! And
+many, many failures must there be; sins of commission
+and of omission too, even among those who earnestly
+seek in this matter to fulfil, always and everywhere,
+the rules of true courtesy, and, which is better
+still, the rules of true Christian love. Nevertheless,
+the aim at which we point is by no means without its
+value as a profitable exercise both of the mind and
+heart. No, nor is it ineffectual and unblessed. For,
+although at times words may be said which we would
+long to <ins title="Transcriber's Note: original reads 'recal'">recall</ins>, and strings of feeling touched by our
+utterance which afterthought tells us we should not<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span>
+have moved, and topics handled with much want of
+that skill and judgment which we should have wished
+most truly to employ, still, with a good aim before us,
+and with right principles in some measure realized,
+and seeking to correct any error when discovered, as
+well as to advance more in all which improves and
+adorns right social intercourse, much will be done
+towards the goodly end. And large indeed will be
+the amount of pleasure and of benefit which you may
+thus hope to reap for yourself and communicate to
+others in the course of your life, and that, too, up to
+an age, should your days be prolonged, when you
+may be shut up, or at all events much restrained,
+from many other means of active usefulness. For
+the mellowed wisdom of age, showing and expressing
+itself in that charity and sympathy for all which nothing
+less than experience itself has taught, is indeed a
+strong and beautiful thing.</p>
+
+<p>Hitherto I have spoken altogether on conversation
+with those whose rank and position of life corresponds
+with your own. A few words now on conversation,
+first, with those of a higher rank, and, secondly, with
+those in the humbler conditions of life&mdash;to use the
+common phrase; and every man should be qualified
+and prepared for any and for all kinds of association.</p>
+
+<p>To those of a higher rank than ourselves we may,
+without derogating in the least from our independence
+and self-respect, show that deference which not only
+the customs of all nations, but the Scripture also<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span>
+most evidently inculcates. This, of course, will appear
+when engaged with them in conversation. It
+will, however, be shown rather in some occasional
+acknowledgment than in the manner or matter of discourse.
+The rank of another does not in the least
+demand that you should surrender your opinion to his,
+nor conceal your sentiments, nor assume any other
+line of subjects and topics than you would address to
+those more immediately your equals in worldly position.
+A vague, undefined notion seems to float through
+each rank of society in our land, that those in the
+stage above think, feel, and act in a manner different
+from those below. A very great mistake this, which
+oftentimes chills and checks and mars all open freedom
+of address when one of an higher and one of a
+lower rank are brought into those circumstances where
+the opportunity for conversation occurs, if not the
+absolute claim. But let it be remembered that the
+mind and heart of man or of woman varies but little
+through these mere distinctions of the world. I do
+not say that it does not vary at all, but very little.
+The main current of joy, the main current of sorrow,
+is the same in all classes, though the lesser streams
+may variously and separately flow. The main current
+of affections, of interests, is the same. All are
+subject to the same need of kind, friendly sympathy;
+all are made to interchange thought; all share in the
+manifold impressions of our common nature. Wealth
+and nobility, and rank and station, are, after all, only<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span>
+artificial things, not the main staple of life in any
+man or woman. When, therefore, you are brought
+into the society of one or more like these, be to them
+appropriately courteous. Acknowledge their position
+at once, and then let your intercourse with them flow
+freely on, just as with others. Trouble not them, nor
+trouble yourself, with any other system of address.
+Deprive not them, nor deprive yourself, of free, open,
+natural communication. And, depend upon it, that
+acting and speaking thus, you will not only be oftentimes
+pleased rather than silenced and embarrassed
+by such society, but you will be sure to please and to
+be valued,&mdash;yes, and to meet no less friendly sympathy,
+both of mind and heart, than is to be found in
+each other rank of life.</p>
+
+<p>And now a few words on conversation with our
+poorer friends or neighbors, or any persons in this
+class of life with whom, habitually, we may have to
+do, or whom we may meet at any time or place.
+And few of that class being, I conclude, here, I may
+speak to you as those who would gladly receive any
+hints for kind consideration as to the right way of
+fulfilling your own part in this matter. For I, too,
+would wish to be a learner on it, so important do I
+conceive it to be. So much has been said, and so
+much has been written, on the benefit of free, kindly
+intercourse between the rich and the poor, the employers
+and the employed, those who labor with their
+heads and those who labor with their hands, that any<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span>
+mere general or vague observations on the subject
+would be quite out of place here. I shall, accordingly,
+regard you not only as admitting this truth, but also
+as desirous yourselves to exemplify it; and, again, as
+admitting, and feeling too, that merely to pay wages,
+and to give directions and commands, and to bestow
+alms, and to support charitable institutions (however
+needful and good such things may be), is not enough
+for one desiring to secure the sympathy and love of
+his poorer brethren. For that you must be ready,
+willing, able to converse with them. To qualify yourself
+for doing this, is in many professions an indispensable
+and most evident duty,&mdash;for instance, with
+the ministers of religion and with medical men. They
+could do nothing without such conversation. And,
+considering it due at proper seasons from every one
+in a higher class of life to those below them, I shall
+just offer you a few hints, which seem to me not unworthy
+of note. Avoid, then, on the one hand, all
+hard, overbearing address; while, on the other, there
+must be energy, spirit, firmness, and life. Avoid all
+semblance of patronage and condescension, but at the
+same time never make any forced attempts to appear
+what you are not, or to assume a character not your
+own. Do not imagine the range of subjects small;
+and, when you can, choose those topics in which you
+and those addressed both take an interest. Many
+there are common to all classes. Be not impatient to
+come to a point too quick, but give people a full<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span>
+opportunity to express themselves in their own way;
+nor count this waste time. It is very much otherwise.
+Use short rather than long sentences,&mdash;language colloquial,
+not that of books,&mdash;giving emphasis, tone,
+and strength to your words,&mdash;never lapsing into
+cold, lifeless, inexpressive tones. Trust oftentimes,
+in conversation with the poor and comparatively uneducated,
+that there is much more intelligence within
+than the answer which they make in words would
+lead you, at first sight, to expect. Be willing and
+ready to tell something about yourself, your family,
+and concerns, when there appears any interest about
+them. Remember that family ties and affections are
+strong in one as in another of the human family;
+and, as among your own friends and associates you
+would refer to these natural topics, so do here. Let
+wants and necessities, and trials and difficulties, not
+be forgotten, but let them not be the whole subject-matter
+of discourse. No, let it range far more widely,
+far more attractively; and your looks and your demeanor,
+and your tones and words, being all directed
+by good will, and by practice too, you indeed will be
+no idler in good works during times and occasions
+thus employed. You will win much love, much
+esteem, much appreciation; you will hear much right
+feeling expressed, and, at times, much to inform you
+of a practical kind. You will do good and receive
+good too.</p>
+
+<p>It appears to me that I have now presented to your<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span>
+notice almost a sufficiency of topics, relative to conversation,
+for one single lecture. Nevertheless, I feel
+unwilling to conclude without drawing your attention
+to a few facts connected with the subject. One is,
+that the ablest and mightiest authors of all times and
+countries have borne their strong testimony to the
+attraction which conversation presents, by casting a
+large portion of their writings into this form or mould.
+Thus did Homer in poetry, Plato in philosophy, and
+dramatists, of all ages, in their plays. Thus did
+Cicero in his various treatises; and Horace appears<a name="FNanchor_B_2" id="FNanchor_B_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_B_2" class="fnanchor">[B]</a>
+talking to you in many and many a page. Dante's
+grand poem, "Il Purgatorio," is chiefly a conversation.
+The French have ever excelled in such writings; and
+of such a character is that well-known gem in the
+literature of Spain, I of course allude to "Don Quixote."
+In Shakspeare and Walter Scott it is the same,
+and they, perhaps, are the most popular writers of our
+land, except one. Who, do you ask, is that? John
+Bunyan, the author of the "Pilgrim's Progress;" but
+that very book comes up with its testimony too, being
+a dialogue throughout,&mdash;rich in pathos and wit, rich
+in illustration, rich in experience, rich in all variety
+and combination,&mdash;in a word, the very perfection of
+talk; not less attractive than it is weighty, not less<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span>
+entertaining than heavenly, holy, and full of all things
+which make a book precious.</p>
+
+<p>But another book there is, of which it is well
+said:&mdash;</p>
+
+<div class='poem'>
+"A glory gilds the sacred page,<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">Majestic like the sun!</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">It gives a light to every age;</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">It gives, but borrows none."</span><br />
+</div>
+
+<div class='unindent'>And in that book of books there are four short but
+most mighty narratives. And each of those narratives
+contains the one most important record which
+ever had to be told upon this earth. Each of them
+gives one concurrent history; namely, that of the life
+of our Lord Jesus Christ, with his sayings and his
+deeds. And of conversation these holy narratives are
+full. God has chosen this mode of reaching our minds
+and influencing our hearts, by large&mdash;very large&mdash;portions
+of them written after this fashion. Cowper
+felt this so deeply, that, in his poem on our present
+subject, he has beautifully told and paraphrased all
+that went on when Jesus met and talked with the two
+disciples on the way to Emmaus. Moreover, in those
+gospels, there is one, penned by that "disciple whom
+Jesus loved;" and if there is much conversation in
+all four of them, in it especially&mdash;in the gospel of
+St. John&mdash;conversation appears in all its full and
+continued glory. Take one or two examples. Mankind,
+all mankind, had to be taught about the complete
+atonement for our sins made by our Saviour on the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span>
+cross. Where is it more clearly, more mightily told
+than in the third chapter of St. John's gospel? But
+what is that chapter? Is it a law prescribed in set
+terms?&mdash;No. Is it a sermon?&mdash;No. Is it a mere
+address?&mdash;No. You will all remember it is a conversation,&mdash;Christ's
+conversation with Nicodemus by
+night. And so it is again in the very next chapter,
+where a subject of no less importance&mdash;I say it advisedly,
+no less importance&mdash;is set forth, viz. the
+work of the Holy Spirit in man's heart; and that is
+portrayed for us in a conversation with the woman of
+Samaria, at Sychar's well. What striking instances
+are these! And many others might be added to
+them. And thus we have before us even the sanction
+and proof from the Word of God, that the most mighty
+and transcendent truth can reach us in no better form
+than that which conversation gives, and also that Jesus
+Christ put his own royal stamp of glory on it, by employing
+it Himself continually, when upon the earth
+among men, though he was their Lord and their God.</div>
+
+<p>Having thus been led on,&mdash;I think very naturally,
+and, as I think, quite appropriately, too, for one of
+my office and position, at any time or place, or on
+any subject,&mdash;I will not return to any lighter theme.
+I do not in the least regret that I have selected my
+present topic out of very many which suggested themselves
+to my mind, when I was asked to exercise the
+privilege of thus addressing you, as I have now done
+for these four years. I might have chosen others far<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span>
+more entertaining, and, no doubt, some far more
+kindling and exciting at this present time,<a name="FNanchor_C_3" id="FNanchor_C_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_C_3" class="fnanchor">[C]</a> when our
+thoughts and our feelings are all so concentrated on
+one distant spot of strife and of contest, and of danger,
+and of bravery, and wounds, and deaths, and bereavements,&mdash;and
+amidst all, of honor unexampled to our
+brave brethren in arms. But, for many reasons, I
+have done otherwise. I have chosen, as usual, a subject
+of general, of national, of wide-world, of never-failing
+interest, from day to day, from week to week,
+from month to month, from year to year, among the
+vast race of our fellows,&mdash;born social creatures,
+born for mutual sympathy, with interchanged utterance,
+speech, and conversation. Strongly do I feel
+its importance, and I cannot help expressing my surprise
+that so little, so very little, has systematically
+been written or said upon it. I have found it no ordinary
+theme, I assure you; and, though it is one on
+which we all instinctively are interested in any circle,
+or with whomsoever we may at any time be, still it is
+not one on which the arrangement and classification
+of thought is an easy thing. I therefore shall not feel
+disappointed, nor, do I trust, will you be disappointed
+either, in that good employment of your time which
+you have a right to expect from me, as your lecturer
+to-night here, if I shall have set before you any
+thoughts, for your attention, which may improve, in
+the least degree, the course and the current of ordinary<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span>
+conversation. When we remember how much
+of our innocent gratification,&mdash;how much of our daily
+harmony one with another,&mdash;how much of our mutual
+improvement,&mdash;depends on the right exercise of
+this goodly gift,&mdash;then, I am sure, you will not consider
+that the subject is one to be neglected or ignored.
+I verily believe that I do not over-state the fact, in
+asserting that for one time when we are liable to hurt,
+or distress, or offend another by our acts and deeds,
+there are fifty or an hundred, or perhaps more, occasions,
+when we are liable to do so by our words, and
+demeanor, and utterance. And again, for once that
+we can do kind and profitable actions to those around
+us, and associating with us, there are fifty or an hundred,&mdash;perhaps
+more occasions still,&mdash;when we can
+please or profit another by our words. I ask you, as
+those who can judge in this matter for yourselves, "Is
+it not so? Is it not so most undeniably?" Well,
+then, if I have been successful in laying down any
+right principles, in exposing anything disadvantageous,
+or in presenting any available means for rendering
+your daily intercourse more evidently kind, more
+evidently sympathizing, more evidently, in a word,
+such as that which every good man would wish to
+exhibit, and which must render him not only welcome
+and not only useful, but a real and true ornament
+of society in the best sense of the word; if I
+have shown you anything whatever available to this
+end, whether for your use at home or abroad, in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span>
+cottage or the shop, in the humblest abode or in the
+noblest and in the wealthiest, then surely I shall not
+have spoken in vain. I speak on no narrow topic,
+and I speak for all. Truly it is one which touches all;
+and in this lies its strength and its interest. There is
+no one, I believe, who does not intuitively and instinctively
+feel either his gain or his loss in conversation,&mdash;the
+effect of it on his own mind and on his own
+feelings at the time and afterwards,&mdash;either its harms
+or its charms. All must feel this, though unable perhaps
+to classify their thoughts or express them on it,
+and perhaps they have never thought of so doing.
+And I, for one, will not hesitate to say that, it having
+been my lot to mix much, and willingly, in all the
+various classes of society,&mdash;and having endeavored,
+so far as in my power has been, to cultivate and show
+a true brotherly and friendly spirit, both to high and
+low,&mdash;I have met nothing to confer more pleasure
+and more advantage in daily life than fit conversation.
+I have found it from the poorest. I have found it
+from those of middle station. I have found it among
+the noble and the rich. And, while without it the
+hours of social and of family life may drag on heavily,
+and in a wearisome and worthless way, under the
+roofs of splendor and magnificence, and in the midst
+of feasts, and pomp, and parade, with it, freely interchanged
+from well-informed heads and cordial hearts,
+expressing what they know and telling what they feel,
+without any restraint except that of love, and tact, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span>
+propriety,&mdash;with it, I say, the simplest home may be
+one of enjoyment and improvement every recurring
+day, and each coming guest will share its attractions,&mdash;and
+therefore I say to every one present, "Despise
+not this gift, and try to improve it; and seek Divine
+help for its right regulation, as well as for its use;
+and be well assured that, under God's blessing, in its
+direction you will gain for yourself, and promote for
+your fellow-creatures, no slight share of true enjoyment,
+no slight benefits both for this world and for the
+world to come."</p>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span></p>
+
+<h2>PART III.</h2>
+
+
+<h2>A WORD TO THE WISE;</h2>
+
+
+<div class='center'>BY<br />
+
+PARRY GWYNNE.</div>
+
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>A WORD TO THE WISE.</h2>
+
+
+
+<h2>INTRODUCTION.</h2>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">It</span> is readily acknowledged, by all well educated
+foreigners, that English Grammar is very easy to
+learn, the difficulties of the language lying in the
+numberless variations and licenses of its pronunciation.
+Since to us then, children of the soil, pronunciation
+has no difficulties to offer, is it not a reproach
+that so many speak their own language in an inelegant
+and slatternly manner,&mdash;either through an inexcusable
+ignorance of grammatical rules, or a wanton violation
+of them? There are two sorts of bad speakers,&mdash;the
+educated and the uneducated. I write for the
+former, and I shall deal the less leniently with them,
+because "where much is given, much will be expected."
+Ay, and where much has been achieved
+too, and intellectual laurels have been gathered, is it
+not a reproach that a <i>slatternly</i> mode of expression
+should sometimes deteriorate from the eloquence of
+the scholar, and place the accomplished man or
+woman, in <i>this</i> respect, on a level with the half-educated
+or the illiterate?<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Some one, I think it is Lord Chesterfield, has wisely
+said, "Whatever is worth doing, is worth doing well."
+Then, if our native language is worth studying, surely
+it is worth <i>speaking well</i>, and as there is no standing
+still in excellence of any kind, so, even in language,&mdash;in
+so simple a thing as the expression of our
+thoughts by words,&mdash;if we do not improve we shall
+retrograde.</p>
+
+<p>It is a common opinion that a knowledge of Latin
+supersedes the necessity of the study of English grammar.
+This must entail a strong imputation of carelessness
+on our Latin students, who sometimes commit
+such solecisms in English as make us regret they did
+not <i>once</i>, at least, peruse the grammatical rules of
+their native language.</p>
+
+<p>We laugh at the blunders of a foreigner, but perpetrate
+our own offences with so much gravity that an
+observer would have a right to suppose we consider
+them what they really are,&mdash;<i>no laughing matter</i>.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>CHAPTER I.</h2>
+
+
+<div class='center'>I.</div>
+
+<p>Some people speak of "so many <i>spoonsfull</i>," instead
+of "so many spoonfuls." The rule on this
+subject says: "Compounds ending in <i>ful</i>, and all
+those in which the principal word is put last, form the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></span>
+plural in the same manner as other nouns,&mdash;as 'handfuls,
+spoonfuls, mouthfuls,'" &amp;c., &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>Logic will demonstrate the propriety of this rule.
+Are you measuring by a plurality of spoons? If so,
+"so many <i>spoonsfull</i>" must be the correct term; but
+if the process of measuring be effected by <i>refilling the
+same spoon</i>, then it becomes evident that the precise
+idea meant to be conveyed is, the <i>quantity</i> contained
+in the vessel by which it is measured, which is a
+"<i>spoonful</i>."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />II.</div>
+
+<p>It is a common mistake to speak of "a disagreeable
+effluvia." This word is <i>effluvium</i> in the singular, and
+<i>effluvia</i> in the plural. The same rule should be observed
+with <i>automaton</i>, <i>arcanum</i>, <i>erratum</i>, <i>phenomenon</i>,
+<i>memorandum</i>, and several others which are less
+frequently used, and which change the <i>um</i> or <i>on</i> into
+<i>a</i>, to form the plural. It is so common a thing, however,
+to say <i>memorandums</i>, that I fear it would sound
+a little pedantic, in colloquial style, to use the word
+<i>memoranda;</i> and it is desirable, perhaps, that custom
+should make an exception of this word, as well as of
+<i>encomium</i>, and allow two terminations to it, according
+to the taste of the speaker and the style of the discourse,&mdash;<i>memorandums</i>
+or <i>memoranda</i>, like <i>encomiums</i>
+or <i>encomia</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[56]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />III.</div>
+
+<p>We have heard <i>pulse</i> and <i>patience</i> treated as pluralities,
+much to our astonishment.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />IV.</div>
+
+<p>It seems to be a position assumed by all grammarians,
+that their readers already understand the
+meaning of the word "case," as applied to nouns and
+pronouns; hence they never enter into a clear explanation
+of the simple term, but proceed at once to a
+discussion of its grammatical distinctions, in which it
+frequently happens that the student, for want of a
+little introductory explanation, is unable to accompany
+them. But I am not going to repeat to the
+scholar how the term "case" is derived from a Latin
+word signifying "to fall," and is so named because
+all the other cases <i>fall</i> or <i>decline</i> from the nominative,
+in order to express the various relations of nouns to
+each other,&mdash;which in Latin they do by a difference
+of termination, in English by the aid of prepositions,&mdash;and
+that an orderly arrangement of all these different
+terminations is called the declension of a noun,
+&amp;c. I am not going to repeat to the scholar the
+things he already knows; but to you, my gentle
+readers, to whom Latin is still an unknown tongue, to
+whom grammars are become obsolete things, and
+grammatical definitions would be bewildering preliminaries,
+"more honored in the breach than in the
+observance,"&mdash;to you I am anxious to explain, in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span>
+clearest manner practicable, all the mysteries of this
+case, because it was a cruel perplexity to myself in
+days of yore. And I will endeavor to make my lecture
+as brief and clear as possible, requesting you to
+bear in mind that no knowledge is to be acquired
+without a little trouble; and that whosoever may consider
+it too irksome a task to exert the understanding
+for a <i>short</i> period, must be content to remain in inexcusable
+and irremediable ignorance. Though, I
+doubt not, when you come to perceive how great the
+errors are which you daily commit, you will not
+regret having sat down quietly for half an hour to
+listen to an unscholastic exposition of them.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />V.</div>
+
+<p>We all understand the meaning of the word "case,"
+as it is applied to the common affairs of life; but
+when we meet with it in our grammars, we view it as
+an abstruse term. We will not consent to believe that
+it means nothing more than <i>position of affairs</i>, <i>condition</i>,
+or <i>circumstances</i>, any one of which words
+might be substituted for it with equal propriety, if it
+were not indispensable in grammar to adhere strictly
+to the same term when we wish to direct the attention
+unerringly to the same thing, and to keep the understanding
+alive to the justness of its application; whilst
+a multiplicity of names to one thing would be likely
+to create confusion. Thus, if one were to say, "This
+is a very hard case," or "A singular case occurred<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</a></span>
+the other day," or "That poor man's case is a very
+deplorable one," we should readily comprehend that
+by the word "case" was meant "circumstance" or
+"situation;" and when we speak, in the language of
+the grammar, of "a noun in the nominative case,"
+we only mean a person or thing placed in such circumstances
+as to become merely named, or named as
+the performer of some action,&mdash;as "the man," or
+"the man walks." In both these sentences, "man"
+is in the nominative case; because in the first he is
+simply <i>named</i>, without reference to any circumstance
+respecting him, and in the second he is named as the
+performer of the <i>act</i> of <i>walking</i> mentioned. When
+we speak of a noun in the possessive case, we simply
+mean a person or thing placed under such circumstances
+as to become named as the <i>possessor</i> of something;
+and when we speak of a noun in the objective
+case, we only intend to express a person or thing
+standing in such a situation as to be, in some way or
+other, affected by the act of some other person or
+thing,&mdash;as "Henry teaches Charles." Here Henry
+is, by an abbreviation of terms, called <i>the nominative
+case</i>, (instead of the <i>noun</i> in the nominative case,)
+because he stands in that situation in which it is incumbent
+on us to name him as the <i>performer</i> of the
+act of teaching; and Charles is, by the same abbreviating
+license, called the <i>objective case</i>, because he
+is in such a position of affairs as to <i>receive</i> the act of
+teaching which Henry performs. I will now tell you<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span>
+how you may always distinguish the three cases.
+Read the sentence attentively, and understand accurately
+what the nouns are represented as doing. If
+any person or thing be represented as <i>performing</i> an
+<i>action</i>, that person or thing is a noun in the nominative
+case. If any person or thing be represented as
+<i>possessing something</i>, that person or thing is a noun in
+the possessive case. And if any person or thing be
+represented as neither performing nor possessing, it is
+a noun in the objective case, whether directly or indirectly
+affected by the action of the nominative; because,
+as we have in English but <i>three</i> cases, which
+contain the substance of the <i>six Latin</i> cases, <i>whatever
+is neither nominative nor possessive must be objective</i>.
+Here I might wander into a long digression on passive
+and neuter verbs, which I may seem to have totally
+overlooked in the principle just laid down; but I am
+not writing a grammar,&mdash;not attempting to illustrate
+the various ramifications of grammatical laws to people
+who know nothing at all about them,&mdash;any more
+than I am writing for the edification of the accomplished
+scholar, to whom purity of diction is already
+familiar. I am writing, chiefly, for that vast portion
+of the educated classes who have never looked into a
+grammar since their school days were over, but who
+have ingeniously hewn out for themselves a middle
+path between ignorance and knowledge, and to whom
+certain little hillocks in their way have risen up, under
+a dense atmosphere, to the magnitude of mountains.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span>
+I merely wish to give to them, since they will not
+take the trouble to search for themselves, one broad
+and general principle, unclogged by exceptions, to
+guide them to propriety of speech; and should they
+afterwards acquire a taste for grammatical disputation,
+they will of course apply to more extensive sources
+for the necessary qualifications.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VI.</div>
+
+<p>It is scarcely possible to commit any inaccuracy in
+the use of these cases when restricted to nouns, but in
+the application of them to pronouns a woful confusion
+often arises; though even in this confusion exists a
+marked distinction between the errors of the ill-bred
+and those of the well-bred man. To use the objective
+instead of the nominative is a <i>vulgar</i> error; to use the
+nominative instead of the objective is a <i>genteel</i> error.
+No person of decent education would think of saying,
+"Him and me are going to the play." Yet how
+often do we hear even well educated people say,
+"They were coming to see my brother and <i>I</i>,"&mdash;"The
+claret will be packed in two hampers for Mr. Smith
+and <i>I</i>,"&mdash;"Let you and <i>I</i> try to move it,"&mdash;"Let
+him and <i>I</i> go up and speak to them,"&mdash;"Between
+you and <i>I</i>," &amp;c. &amp;c.;&mdash;faults as heinous as that of the
+vulgarian who says, "Him and me are going to the
+play," and with less excuse. Two minutes' reflection
+will enable the scholar to correct himself, and a little
+exercise of memory will shield him from a repetition<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span>
+of the fault; but, for the benefit of those who may
+<i>not</i> be scholars, we will accompany him through the
+mazes of his reflections. Who are the persons that
+are performing the act of "coming to see"? "<i>They</i>."
+Then the pronoun <i>they</i> must stand in the nominative
+case. Who are the persons to whom the act of
+"coming to see" extends? "My brother and I."
+Then "my brother and I," being the <i>objects affected</i>
+by the act of the nominative, must be a noun and
+pronoun standing in the objective case; and as nouns
+are not susceptible of change on account of cases, it
+is only the <i>pronoun</i> which requires alteration to render
+the sentence correct: "They were coming to see my
+brother and <i>me</i>." The same argument is applicable
+to the other examples given. In the English language,
+the imperative mood of a verb is never conjugated
+with a pronoun in the nominative case, therefore,
+"Let you and <i>I</i> try to move it," "Let him and <i>I</i> go
+up and speak to them," are manifest improprieties.
+A very simple test may be formed by taking away
+the first noun or pronoun from the sentence altogether,
+and bringing the verb or preposition right against that
+pronoun which you use to designate yourself: thus,
+"They were coming to see <i>I</i>," "The claret will be
+packed in two hampers for <i>I</i>," "Let <i>I</i> try to move
+it," &amp;c. By this means your own ear will correct
+you, without any reference to grammatical rules.
+And bear in mind that the number of <i>nouns</i> it may be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span>
+necessary to press into the sentence will not alter the
+<i>case</i> respecting the pronouns.</p>
+
+<p>"Between you and I" is as erroneous an expression
+as any. Change the position of the pronouns, and
+say, "Between I and you;" or change the sentence
+altogether, and say, "Between I and the wall there
+was a great gap;" and you will soon see in what
+case the first person should be rendered. "Prepositions
+govern the objective case," therefore it is impossible
+to put a nominative <i>after</i> a preposition without
+a gross violation of a rule which ought to be familiar
+to everybody.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VII.</div>
+
+<p>The same mistake extends to the relative pronouns
+"who" and "whom." We seldom hear the objective
+case used either by vulgar or refined speakers.
+"Who did you give it to?" "Who is this for?" are
+solecisms of daily occurrence; and when the objective
+"whom" <i>is</i> used, it is generally put in the wrong
+place; as, "The person whom I expected would purchase
+that estate," "The man whom they intend shall
+execute that work." This intervening verb in each
+sentence, "I expected" and "they intend," coming
+between the last verb and its own nominative (the
+relative pronoun), has no power to alter the rule, and
+no right to violate it; but as the introduction of an intervening
+verb, in such situations, is likely to beguile
+the ear and confuse the judgment, it would be better<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span>
+to avoid such constructions altogether, and turn the
+sentence in a different way; as, "The person whom I
+expected <i>to be</i> the purchaser of that estate," "The
+man whom they intend <i>to</i> execute that work." If the
+reader will cut off the intervening verb, which has
+nothing to do with the construction of the sentence,
+except to mystify it, he will perceive at a glance the
+error and its remedy: "The person <i>whom</i> would
+purchase that estate," "The man <i>whom</i> shall execute
+that work."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VIII.</div>
+
+<p>It is very easy to mistake the nominative when
+another noun comes between it and the verb, which is
+frequently the case in the use of the indefinite and
+distributive pronouns; as, "One of those houses <i>were</i>
+sold last week," "Each of the daughters <i>are</i> to have
+a separate share," "Every tree in those plantations
+<i>have</i> been injured by the storm," "Either of the children
+<i>are</i> at liberty to claim it." Here it will be perceived
+that the pronouns "one," "each," "every,"
+"either," are the true nominatives to the verbs; but
+the intervening noun in the plural number, in each
+sentence, deludes the ear, and the speaker, without
+reflection, renders the verb in the plural instead of the
+singular number. The same error is often committed
+when no second noun appears to plead an apology for
+the fault; as, "Each city <i>have their</i> peculiar privileges,"
+"Everybody has a right to look after <i>their</i><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span>
+own interest," "Either <i>are</i> at liberty to claim it."
+This is the effect of pure carelessness.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />IX.</div>
+
+<p>There is another very common error, the reverse
+of the last mentioned, which is that of rendering the
+adjective pronoun in the <i>plural</i> number instead of the
+singular in such sentences as the following: "<i>These</i>
+kind of entertainments are not conducive to general
+improvement," "<i>Those</i> sort of experiments are often
+dangerous." This error seems to originate in the
+habit which people insensibly acquire of supposing
+the prominent noun in the sentence (such as "entertainments"
+or "experiments") to be the noun qualified
+by the adjective "these" or "those;" instead of
+which it is "kind," "sort," or any word of that
+description <i>immediately following</i> the adjective, which
+should be so qualified, and the adjective must be
+made to agree with it in the singular number. We
+confess it is not so agreeable to the ear to say, "<i>This</i>
+kind of entertainments," "<i>That</i> sort of experiments;"
+but it would be easy to give the sentence a different
+form, and say, "Entertainments of this kind," "Experiments
+of that sort," by which the requisitions of
+grammar would be satisfied, and those of euphony too.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />X.</div>
+
+<p>But the grand fault, the glaring impropriety, committed
+by "all ranks and conditions of men," rich<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span>
+and poor, high and low, illiterate and learned,&mdash;except,
+perhaps, one in twenty,&mdash;and from which not
+even the pulpit or the bar is totally free,&mdash;is, the
+substitution of the active verb <i>lay</i> for the neuter verb
+<i>lie</i> (to lie down). The scholar <i>knows</i> that "active
+verbs govern the objective case," and therefore <i>demand</i>
+an objective case after them; and that neuter
+verbs <i>will not admit</i> an objective case after them,
+<i>except</i> through the medium of a preposition. <i>He</i>,
+therefore, has no excuse for his error, it is a wilful
+one; for him the following is not written. And here
+I may as well say, once for all, that whilst I would
+<i>remind</i> the <i>scholar</i> of his lapses, my instructions and
+explanations are offered <i>only</i> to the class which requires
+them.</p>
+
+<p>"To lay" is an active transitive verb, like <i>love</i>,
+<i>demanding</i> an objective case after it, <i>without the
+intervention of a preposition</i>. "To lie" is a neuter
+verb, <i>not admitting an objective case after it, except
+through the intervention of a preposition;</i>&mdash;yet this
+"perverse generation" <i>will</i> go on substituting the
+former for the latter. Nothing can be more erroneous
+than to say, as people constantly do, "I shall go and
+lay down." The question which naturally arises in
+the mind of the discriminating hearer is, "<i>What</i> are
+you going to lay down,&mdash;money, carpets, plans, or
+what?" for, as a transitive verb is used, an object is
+wanted to complete the sense. The speaker means,
+in fact, to tell us that he (himself) is going to <i>lie<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span>
+down</i>, instead of which he gives us to understand that
+he is going to <i>lay</i> down or <i>put</i> down something which
+he has not named, but which it is necessary to name
+before we can understand the sentence; and this sentence,
+when completed according to the rules of grammar,
+will never convey the meaning he intends. One
+might as well use the verb "to put" in this situation,
+as the verb "to lay," for each is a transitive verb,
+requiring an objective case immediately after it. If
+you were to enter a room, and, finding a person lying
+on the sofa, were to address him with such a question
+as "What are you doing there?" you would think it
+ludicrous if he were to reply, "I am <i>putting</i> down;"
+yet it would not be more absurd than to say, "I am
+<i>laying</i> down;" but custom, whilst it fails to reconcile
+us to the error, has so familiarized us with it, that we
+hear it without surprise, and good breeding forbids our
+noticing it to the speaker. The same mistake is committed
+through all the tenses of the verb. How often
+are nice ears wounded by the following expressions,&mdash;"My
+brother <i>lays</i> ill of a fever,"&mdash;"The vessel
+<i>lays</i> in St. Katharine's Docks,"&mdash;"The books were
+<i>laying</i> on the floor,"&mdash;"He <i>laid</i> on a sofa three
+weeks,"&mdash;"After I had <i>laid</i> down, I remembered
+that I had left my pistols <i>laying</i> on the table." You
+must perceive that, in every one of these instances,
+the wrong verb is used; correct it, therefore, according
+to the explanation given; thus, "My brother <i>lies</i>
+ill of a fever,"&mdash;"The vessel <i>lies</i> in St Katherine's<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span>
+Docks,"&mdash;"The books were <i>lying</i> on the floor,"&mdash;"He
+<i>lay</i> on a sofa three weeks,"&mdash;"After I had <i>lain</i>
+down, I remembered that I had left my pistols <i>lying</i>
+on the table."</p>
+
+<p>It is probable that this error has originated in the
+circumstance of the present tense of the verb "to
+lay" being conjugated precisely like the imperfect
+tense of the verb "to lie," for they are alike in orthography
+and sound, and different only in meaning; and
+in order to remedy the evil which this resemblance
+seems to have created, I have conjugated at full length
+the simple tenses of the two verbs, hoping the exposition
+may be found useful; for it is an error which
+<i>must</i> be corrected by all who aspire to the merit of
+speaking their own language <i>well</i>.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'><span class="smcap">Verb Active.</span><br /><i>To lay.</i><br />Present tense.</div>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Table 1">
+<tr><td align='left'>I lay</td><td align='left' rowspan='6'><img src="images/bracket1.png" width="21" height="150" alt="Bracket" title="" />
+</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Thou layest&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>money,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>He lays</td><td align='left'>carpets,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>We lay</td><td align='left'>plans,&mdash;any</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>You lay</td><td align='left'><i>thing</i>.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>They lay</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />Imperfect tense.</div>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Imperfect">
+<tr><td align='left'>I laid</td><td align='left' rowspan='6'><img src="images/bracket1.png" width="21" height="150" alt="Bracket" title="" />
+</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Thou laidest</td><td align='left'>money,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>He laid</td><td align='left'>carpets,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>We laid</td><td align='left'>plans,&mdash;any</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>You laid</td><td align='left'><i>thing</i>.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>They laid</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Participles">
+<tr><td align='left'><br />Present Participle, Laying.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Perfect Participle, Laid.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'><br /><br /><br /><span class="smcap">Verb Neuter.</span><br />
+
+<i>To lie.</i><br />
+<br />
+Present tense.<br /></div>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Present tense">
+<tr><td align='left'>I lie</td><td align='left' rowspan='6'><img src="images/bracket1.png" width="21" height="150" alt="Bracket" title="" /></td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Thou liest</td><td align='left'>down,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>He lies</td><td align='left'>too long,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>We lie</td><td align='left'>on a sofa,&mdash;any</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>You lie</td><td align='left'><i>where</i>.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>They lie</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />Imperfect tense.<br /></div>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Imperfect">
+<tr><td align='left'>I lay</td><td align='left' rowspan='6'><img src="images/bracket1.png" width="21" height="150" alt="Bracket" title="" /></td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Thou layest</td><td align='left'>down,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>He lays</td><td align='left'>too long,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>We lay</td><td align='left'>on a sofa,&mdash;any</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>You lay</td><td align='left'><i>where</i>.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>They lay</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Participles">
+<tr><td align='left'><br />Present Participle, Lying,</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Perfect Participle, Lain.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In such sentences as these, wherein the verb is used
+reflectively,&mdash;"If I lay myself down on the grass I
+shall catch cold," "He laid himself down on the
+green sward,"&mdash;the verb "to lay" is with propriety
+substituted for the verb "to lie;" for the addition
+of the emphatic pronoun <i>myself</i>, or <i>himself</i>, constituting
+an objective case, and coming <i>immediately
+after</i> the verb, <i>without the intervention of a preposition</i>,
+renders it necessary that the verb employed
+should be <i>active</i>, not <i>neuter</i>, because "active verbs
+govern the objective case." But this is the only construction
+in which "to lay" instead of "to lie" can
+be sanctioned by the rules of grammar.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XI.</div>
+
+<p>The same confusion often arises in the use of the
+verbs <i>sit</i> and <i>set</i>, <i>rise</i> and <i>raise</i>. <i>Sit</i> is a neuter
+verb, <i>set</i> an active one; yet how often do people most
+improperly say, "I have <i>set</i> with him for hours,"
+"He <i>set</i> on the beach till the sun went down," "She
+<i>set</i> three nights by the patient's bedside." What did
+they set,&mdash;potatoes, traps, or what? for as an objective
+case is evidently implied by the use of an active
+verb, an object is indispensable to complete the sense.
+No tense whatever of the verb "to sit" is rendered
+"set," which has but <i>one word</i> throughout the whole
+verb, except the active participle "setting;" and
+"sit" has but two words, "sit" and "sat," except
+the active participle "sitting;" therefore it is very<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span>
+easy to correct this error by the help of a little attention.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XII.</div>
+
+<p><i>Raise</i> is the same kind of verb as <i>set</i>,&mdash;active-transitive,
+requiring an objective case after it; and it
+contains only two words, <i>raise</i> and <i>raised</i>, besides
+the active participle <i>raising</i>. <i>Rise</i> is a neuter verb,
+not admitting an objective case. It contains two
+words, <i>rise</i> and <i>rose;</i> besides the two participles,
+<i>rising</i> and <i>risen</i>. It is improper, therefore, to say,
+"He <i>rose</i> the books from the floor," "He <i>rises</i> the
+fruit as it falls," "After she had <i>risen</i> the basket on
+her head," &amp;c. In all such cases use the other verb
+<i>raise</i>. It occurs to me, that if people would take the
+trouble to reckon how many different words a verb
+contains, they would be in less danger of mistaking
+them. "Lay" contains two words, "lay" and "laid,"
+besides the active participle "laying." "Lie" has
+also two words, "lie" and "lay," besides the two
+participles "lying" and "lain;" and from this second
+word "lay" arises all the confusion I have had to
+lament in the foregoing pages.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XIII.</div>
+
+<p>To the scholar I would remark the prevalent impropriety
+of adopting the subjunctive instead of the
+indicative mood, in sentences where doubt or uncertainty
+is expressed, although the former can only be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span>
+used in situations in which "contingency and futurity"
+are combined. Thus, a gentleman, giving an order
+to his tailor, may say, "Make me a coat of a certain
+description, if it <i>fit</i> me well I will give you another
+order;" because the "fit" alluded to is a thing which
+the future has to determine. But when the coat is
+made and brought home, he cannot say, "If this cloth
+<i>be good</i> I will give you another order," for the quality
+of the cloth is <i>already</i> determined; the future will
+not alter it. It may be good, it may be bad, but
+whatever it <i>may be</i> it already <i>is;</i> therefore, as contingency
+only is implied, <i>without futurity</i>, it must be
+rendered in the indicative mood, "If this cloth <i>is</i>
+good," &amp;c. We may with propriety say, "If the
+book be sent in time, I shall be able to read it to-night,"
+because the sending of the book is an event
+which the <i>future</i> must produce; but we must not say,
+"If this book be sent for me, it is a mistake," because
+here the act alluded to is already performed,&mdash;the
+book has come. I think it very likely that people
+have been beguiled into this error by the prefix of the
+conjunction, forgetting that conjunctions may be used
+with the indicative as well as with the subjunctive
+mood.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XIV.</div>
+
+<p>Some people use the imperfect tense of the verb
+"to go," instead of the past participle, and say, "I
+should have <i>went</i>," instead of "I should have gone."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span>
+This is <i>not</i> a very common error, but it is a very
+great one; and I should not have thought it could
+come within the range of the class for which this
+book is written, but that I have heard the fault committed
+by people of even tolerable education. One
+might as well say, "I should have <i>was</i> at the theatre
+last night," instead of "I should have <i>been</i> at the
+theatre," &amp;c., as say, "I should have <i>went</i>" instead
+of "I should have <i>gone</i>."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XV.</div>
+
+<p>Others there are who invert this error, and use the
+past participle of the verb "to do" instead of a tense
+of the verb, saying, "I <i>done</i>" instead of "I <i>did</i>."
+This is inadmissible. "I <i>did</i> it," or "I <i>have done</i> it,"
+is a phrase correct in its formation, its application
+being, of course, dependent on other circumstances.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XVI.</div>
+
+<p>There are speakers who are <i>too refined</i> to use the
+past (or perfect) participle of the verbs "to drink,"
+"to run," "to begin," &amp;c., and substitute the <i>imperfect
+tense</i>, as in the verb "to go." Thus, instead of
+saying, "I have drunk," "he has run," "they have
+begun," they say, "I have <i>drank</i>" "he has <i>ran</i>,"
+"they have <i>began</i>" &amp;c. These are minor errors, I
+admit; still, nice ears detect them.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XVII.</div>
+
+<p>I trust it is unnecessary to warn any of my readers
+against adopting the flagrant vulgarity of saying
+"<i>don't</i> ought," and "<i>hadn't</i> ought," instead of "ought
+<i>not</i>." It is also incorrect to employ <i>no</i> for <i>not</i> in
+such phrases as, "If it is true or <i>no</i> (not)," "Is it so
+or <i>no</i> (not)?"</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XVIII.</div>
+
+<p>Many people have an odd way of saying, "I expect,"
+when they only mean "I think," or "I conclude;"
+as, "I expect my brother is gone to Richmond
+to-day," "I expect those books were sent to Paris
+last year." This is wrong. <i>Expect</i> can relate only
+to <i>future</i> time, and must be followed by a future
+tense, or a verb in the infinitive mood; as, "I expect
+my brother <i>will go</i> to Richmond to-day," "I expect
+<i>to find</i> those books were sent to Paris last year."
+Here the introduction of a future tense, or of a verb
+in the infinitive mood, rectifies the grammar without
+altering the sense; but such a portion of the sentence
+must not be omitted in expression, as no such ellipsis
+is allowable.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XIX.</div>
+
+<p>The majority of speakers use the imperfect tense
+and the perfect tense together, in such sentences as
+the following,&mdash;"I intended to <i>have called</i> on him
+last night," "I meant to <i>have purchased</i> one yesterday,"&mdash;or
+a pluperfect tense, and a perfect tense<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span>
+together I have sometimes heard, as, "You should
+<i>have written</i> to <i>have told</i> her." These expressions
+are illogical, because, as the <i>intention</i> to perform an
+act <i>must</i> be <i>prior</i> to the act contemplated, the act
+itself cannot with propriety be expressed by a tense
+indicating a period of time <i>previous</i> to the intention.
+The three sentences should be corrected thus, placing
+the second verb in the infinitive mood, "I intended <i>to
+call</i> on him last night," "I meant <i>to purchase</i> one
+yesterday," "You should have written <i>to tell</i> her."</p>
+
+<p>But the imperfect tense and the perfect tense are to
+be combined in such sentences as the following, "I
+remarked that they appeared to have undergone great
+fatigue;" because here the act of "undergoing
+fatigue" <i>must</i> have taken place <i>previous</i> to the period
+in which you have had the opportunity of remarking
+its effect on their appearance; the sentence, therefore,
+is both grammatical and logical.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XX.</div>
+
+<p>Another strange perversion of grammatical propriety
+is to be heard occasionally in the adoption of
+the present tense of the verb "to have," most probably
+instead of the past participle, but in situations in
+which the participle itself would be a redundance;
+such as, "If I had <i>have</i> known," "If he had <i>have</i>
+come according to appointment," "If you had <i>have</i>
+sent me that intelligence," &amp;c. Of what utility is the
+word "have" in the sentence at all? What office<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span>
+does it perform? If it stands in place of any other
+word, that other word would still be an incumbrance;
+but the sentence being complete without it, it becomes
+an illiterate superfluity. "If I had <i>have</i> known that
+you would have been there before me, I would have
+written to you to <i>have</i> waited till I had <i>have</i> come."
+What a construction from the lips of an educated
+person! and yet we do sometimes hear this <i>slip-slop</i>
+uttered by people who are considered to "speak
+French and Italian <i>well</i>," and who enjoy the reputation
+of being "accomplished!"</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXI.</div>
+
+<p>It is amusing to observe the broad line of demarcation
+which exists between <i>vulgar</i> bad grammar and
+<i>genteel</i> bad grammar, and which characterizes the
+violation of almost every rule of syntax. The vulgar
+speaker uses adjectives instead of adverbs, and says,
+"This letter is written <i>shocking;</i>" the genteel speaker
+uses adverbs instead of adjectives, and says, "This
+writing looks <i>shockingly</i>." The perpetrators of the
+latter offence may fancy they can shield themselves
+behind the grammatical law which compels the employment
+of an adverb, not an adjective, to qualify
+a verb, and behind the first rule of syntax, which
+says "a verb must agree with its nominative." But
+which <i>is</i> the nominative in the expression alluded to?
+<i>Which</i> performs the act of looking,&mdash;the writing or
+the speaker? To say that a thing <i>looks</i> when <i>we</i><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span>
+look <i>at</i> it, is an idiom peculiar to our language, and
+some idioms are not reducible to rules; they are conventional
+terms which pass current, like bank notes,
+for the sterling they represent, but must not be submitted
+to the test of grammatical alchymy. It is
+improper, therefore, to say, "The queen looks beautifully,"
+"The flowers smell sweetly," "This writing
+looks shockingly;" because it is the speaker that
+performs the act of looking, smelling, &amp;c., not the
+noun looked <i>at;</i> and though, by an idiomatical construction
+necessary to avoid circumlocution, the sentence
+<i>imputes the act</i> to the <i>thing beheld</i>, the qualifying
+word must express the quality of the thing spoken
+of, <i>adjectively</i>, instead of qualifying the act of the
+nominative understood, <i>adverbially</i>. What an adjective
+is to a noun, an adverb is to a verb; an adjective
+expresses the quality of a thing, and an adverb the
+manner of an action. Consider what it is you wish
+to express, the <i>quality of a thing</i>, or the <i>manner of
+an action</i>, and use an adjective or adverb accordingly.
+But beware that you discriminate justly; for though
+you cannot say, "The queen looked <i>majestically</i> in
+her robes," because here the act of <i>looking</i> is performed
+by the spectator, who looks <i>at</i> her, you can
+and <i>must</i> say, "The queen looked <i>graciously</i> on the
+petitioner," "The queen looked <i>mercifully</i> on his
+prayer," because here the <i>act</i> of <i>looking</i> is performed
+<i>by</i> the queen. You cannot say, "These flowers smell
+sweetly," because it is <i>you</i> that smell, and not the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span>
+flowers; but you can say, "These flowers perfume
+the air deliciously," because it is <i>they</i> which impart
+the fragrance, not you. You cannot say, "This
+dress looks badly," because it is you that look, not
+the dress; but you can say, "This dress <i>fits</i> badly,"
+because it is the dress that performs the act of fitting
+either well or ill. There are some peculiar idioms
+which it would be better to avoid altogether, if possible;
+but if you feel compelled to use them, take
+them as they are,&mdash;you cannot prune and refine
+them by the rules of syntax, and to attempt to do so
+shows ignorance as well as affectation.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXII.</div>
+
+<p>There is a mistake often committed in the use of
+the adverbs of place, <i>hence</i>, <i>thence</i>, <i>whence</i>. People
+are apt to say, "He will go <i>from thence</i> to-morrow,"
+&amp;c. The preposition "from" is included in these
+adverbs, therefore it becomes tautology in sense when
+prefixed to them.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXIII.</div>
+
+<p>"Equally as well" is a very common expression,
+and a very incorrect one; the adverb of comparison,
+"as," has no right in the sentence. "Equally well,"
+"Equally high," "Equally dear," should be the construction;
+and if a complement be necessary in the
+phrase, it should be preceded by the preposition
+"with," as, "The wall was equally high with the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span>
+former one," "The goods at Smith's are equally dear
+with those sold at the shop next door," &amp;c. "Equally
+the same" is tautology.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXIV.</div>
+
+<p>"Whether," sometimes an adverb, sometimes a
+conjunction, is a word that plainly indicates a choice
+of things (of course I cannot be supposed to mean a
+<i>freedom</i> of choice); it is highly improper, therefore,
+to place it, as many do, at the head of each part of a
+sentence, as, "I have not yet made up my mind
+whether I shall go to France, or <i>whether</i> I shall remain
+in England." The conjunction should not be repeated,
+as it is evident the alternative is expressed
+<i>only in the combination</i> of the <i>two</i> parts of the sentence,
+not in either of them taken separately; and the
+phrase should stand thus, "I have not yet made up
+my mind whether I shall go to France <i>or</i> remain in
+England."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXV.</div>
+
+<p>There is an awkwardness prevalent amongst all
+classes of society in such sentences as the following:
+"He quitted his horse, and got <i>on to</i> a stage coach,"
+"He jumped <i>on to</i> the floor," "She laid it <i>on to</i> a
+dish," "I threw it <i>on to</i> the fire." Why use two
+prepositions where one would be quite as explicit, and
+far more elegant? Nobody, at the present day,
+would think of saying, "He came up to London <i>for</i>
+to go to the exhibition," because the preposition<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span>
+"for" would be an awkward superfluity. So is
+"to" in the examples given; in each of which there
+is an unwieldiness of construction which reminds one
+of the process of glueing, or fastening, one thing "on
+to" another. Expunge the redundant preposition,
+and be assured, gentle reader, the sentence will still
+be found "an elegant sufficiency." There are some
+situations, however, in which the two prepositions
+may with propriety be employed, though they are
+never indispensable, as, "I accompanied such a one
+to Islington, and then walked on to Kingsland." But
+here <i>two</i> motions are implied, the walking onward,
+and the reaching of a certain point. More might be
+said to illustrate the distinction, but we believe it
+will not be deemed necessary.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXVI.</div>
+
+<p>There seems to be a natural tendency to deal in a
+redundance of prepositions. Many people talk of
+"continuing <i>on</i>." I should be glad to be informed in
+what other direction it would be possible to <i>continue</i>.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXVII.</div>
+
+<p>It is most illiterate to put the preposition <i>of</i> after
+the adverb <i>off</i>, as, "The satin measured twelve yards
+before I cut this piece <i>off of</i> it," "The fruit was gathered
+<i>off of</i> that tree." Many of my readers will
+consider such a remark quite unnecessary in this<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></span>
+volume; but many others, who ought to know better,
+must stand self-condemned on reading it.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXVIII.</div>
+
+<p>There is a false taste extant for the preposition
+"on" instead of "<i>of</i>" in songs, poetry, and many
+other situations in which there is still less excuse for
+borrowing the poetic license; such as, "Wilt thou
+think <i>on</i> me, love?" "I will think <i>on</i> thee, love,"
+"Then think <i>on</i> the friend who once welcomed it
+too," &amp;c., &amp;c. But this is an error chiefly to be met
+with among poetasters and melodramatic speakers.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXIX.</div>
+
+<p>Some people add a superfluous preposition at the
+end of a sentence,&mdash;"More than you think <i>for</i>."
+This, however, is an awkwardness rarely committed
+by persons of decent education.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXX.</div>
+
+<p>That "prepositions govern the objective case" is a
+golden rule of grammar; and if it were only <i>well
+remembered</i>, it would effectually correct that mistake
+of substituting the nominative for the objective pronoun,
+which has been complained of in the preceding
+pages. In using a relative pronoun in the objective
+case, it is more elegant to put the preposition before
+than after it, thus, "To whom was the order given?"
+instead of, "Whom was the order given to?" Indeed,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span>
+if this practice were to be invariably adopted, it
+would obviate the possibility of confounding the nominative
+with the objective case, because no man would
+ever find himself able to utter such a sentence as,
+"To who was this proposal made?" though he might
+very unconsciously say, "Who was this proposal
+made to?" and the error would be equally flagrant
+in both instances.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXXI.</div>
+
+<p>There is a great inaccuracy connected with the use
+of the disjunctive conjunctions <i>or</i> and <i>nor</i>, which
+seem to be either not clearly understood, or treated
+with undue contempt by persons who speak in the
+following manner: "Henry or John <i>are</i> to go there
+to-night," "His son or his nephew <i>have</i> since put in
+<i>their</i> claim," "Neither one <i>nor</i> the other <i>have</i> the
+least chance of success." The conjunctions disjunctive
+"or" and "nor" separate the objects in sense,
+as the conjunction copulative unites them; and as, by
+the use of the former, the things stand forth separately
+and singly to the comprehension, the verb or pronoun
+must be rendered in the singular number also; as,
+"Henry <i>or</i> John <i>is</i> to go there to-night," "His son
+<i>or</i> his nephew <i>has</i> since put in <i>his</i> claim," &amp;c. If
+you look over the sentence, you will perceive that
+only <i>one</i> is to do the act, therefore only <i>one</i> can be
+the nominative to the verb.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXXII.</div>
+
+<p>Many people improperly substitute the disjunctive
+"but" for the comparative "than," as, "The mind
+no sooner entertains any proposition, <i>but</i> it presently
+hastens to some hypothesis to bottom it on."&mdash;<i>Locke.</i>
+"No other resource <i>but</i> this was allowed him."
+"My behavior," says she, "has, I fear, been the
+death of a man who had no other fault <i>but</i> that of
+loving me too much."&mdash;<i>Spectator.</i></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXXIII.</div>
+
+<p>Sometimes a relative pronoun is used instead of a
+conjunction, in such sentences as the following: "I
+don't know but <i>what</i> I shall go to Brighton to-morrow,"
+instead of, "I don't know but <i>that</i>," &amp;c.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XXXIV.</div>
+
+<p>Sometimes the disjunctive <i>but</i> is substituted for the
+conjunction <i>that</i>, as, "I have no doubt <i>but</i> he will be
+here to-night." Sometimes for the conjunction <i>if</i>, as,
+"I shouldn't wonder <i>but</i> that was the case." And
+sometimes <i>two</i> conjunctions are used instead of one,
+as, "<i>If that</i> I have offended him," "<i>After that</i> he
+had seen the parties," &amp;c. All this is very awkward
+indeed, and ought to be avoided, and might easily be
+so by a little attention.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>CHAPTER II.</h2>
+
+
+<div class='center'>I.</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">It</span> is obsolete now to use the article <i>an</i> before words
+beginning with long <i>u</i> or with <i>eu</i>, and it has become
+more elegant, in modern style, to say, "a university,"
+"a useful article," "a European," "a euphonious
+combination of sentences," &amp;c., &amp;c. It is also proper
+to say "such a one," not "such an one."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />II.</div>
+
+<p>Some people pronounce the plural of handkerchief,
+scarf, wharf, dwarf, <i>handkerchieves</i>, <i>scarves</i>, <i>wharves</i>,
+<i>dwarves</i>. This is an error, as these words, and perhaps
+a few others, are exceptions to the rule laid
+down, that nouns ending in <i>f</i> and <i>fe</i> shall change these
+terminations into <i>ves</i> to form the plural.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />III.</div>
+
+<p>There is an illiterate mode of pronouncing the
+adverb <i>too</i>, which is that of contracting it into the
+sound of the preposition <i>to;</i> thus, "I think I paid <i>to
+much</i> for this gun," "This line is <i>to long</i> by half."
+The adverb <i>too</i> should be pronounced like the numeral
+adjective <i>two</i>, and have the same full distinct sound in
+delivery, as, "I think I paid <i>two</i> much for this gun,"
+"This line is <i>two</i> long by half."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />IV.</div>
+
+<p>One does not expect to hear such words as "necessi'ated,"
+"preventative," &amp;c., from people who profess
+to be educated; but one <i>does</i> hear them, nevertheless,
+and many others of the same genus, of which
+the following list is a specimen, not a collection.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Wrong pronunciation">
+<tr><td align='left' colspan='3'>"Febuary" and "Febbiwerry," instead of February.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Seckaterry"&nbsp; </td><td align='left'>instead of&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>secretary.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Gover'ment"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>government.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Eve'min"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>evening.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Sev'm"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>seven.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Holladiz"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>holidays.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>"Mossle"</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>morsel.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<p>"Chapped," according to orthography, instead of
+<i>chopped</i>, according to polite usage.</p>
+
+<p>And we have even heard "continental" pronounced
+<i>continential</i>, though upon what authority we know
+not. Besides these, a multitude of others might be
+quoted, which we consider too familiar to particularize
+and "too numerous to mention."</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />V.</div>
+
+<p>There is an old jest on record of a person hearing
+another pronounce the word curiosity "<i>curosity</i>,"
+and remarking to a bystander, "That man murders
+the English language." "Nay," replies the person
+addressed, "he only knocks an eye (i) out." And I
+am invariably reminded of this old jest whenever I<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span>
+hear such pronunciations as the following,&mdash;"Lat'n"
+for Latin, "sat'n" for satin, and Britain pronounced
+so as to rhyme with <i>written</i>,&mdash;of which a few examples
+will be given on a subsequent page, not with
+the wild hope of comprising in so short a space <i>all</i>
+the perversions of prosody which are constantly taking
+place, but simply with the intention of reminding
+careless speakers of some general principles they
+seem to have forgotten, and of the vast accumulation
+of error they may engraft upon themselves by a lazy
+adherence to the custom of the crowd. Before, however,
+proceeding to the words in question, it may be
+satisfactory to our readers to recall to their memory
+the observations of Lindley Murray on the subject.
+He says, "There is scarcely anything which more
+distinguishes a person of poor education from a person
+of a good one than the pronunciation of the <i>unaccented
+vowels</i>. When vowels are <i>under the accent</i>, the best
+speakers, and the lowest of the people, with very few
+exceptions, pronounce them in the same manner; but
+the <i>un</i>accented vowels in the mouths of the former
+have a distinct, open, and specific sound, while the
+latter often totally sink them, or change them into
+some other sound." The words that have chiefly
+struck me are the following, in which not only the i
+but some of the other vowels are submitted to the
+mutilating process, or, as I have heard it pronounced,
+<i>mutulating</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[85]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="Things not to say">
+<tr><td align='left'>Brit'n&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>instead of&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td align='left'>Britain.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Lat'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Latin.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Sat'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Satin.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Patt'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Patten.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Curt'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Curtain.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Cert'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Certain.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Bridle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Bridal.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Idle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Idol.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Meddle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Medal.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Moddle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Model.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Mentle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Mental.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Mortle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Mortal.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Fatle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Fatal.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Gravle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Gravel.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Travle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Travel.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Sudd'n</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Sudden.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'>Infidle</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'>Infidel.</td></tr>
+<tr><td align='left'><i>Scroop</i>'-lous</td><td align='center'>"</td><td align='left'><i>Scru-pu</i>-lous.</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<p>And a long train of <i>et cetera</i>, of which the above
+examples do not furnish a tithe.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Note.</i>&mdash;That to sound the <i>e</i> in <i>garden</i> and <i>often</i>, and the <i>i</i>
+in <i>evil</i> and <i>devil</i>, is a decided error. They should always be
+pronounced <i>gard'n</i> and <i>oft'n</i>, <i>ev'l</i> and <i>dev'l</i>.</p></div>
+
+<p>Some people pronounce the <i>I</i> in Irish and its concomitants
+so as to make the words Ireland, Irishmen,
+Irish linen, &amp;c., sound as if they were written <i>Arland</i>,
+<i>A-rishmen</i>, <i>Arish</i> linen, &amp;c. This is literally "knocking
+an <i>i</i> out."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[86]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VI.</div>
+
+<p>It is affected, and contrary to authority, to deprive
+the <i>s</i> of its sharp hissing sound in the words <i>precise</i>,
+<i>desolate</i>, <i>design</i>, and their derivatives.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VII.</div>
+
+<p>There is one peculiarity which we feel bound to
+notice, because it has infected English speakers,&mdash;that
+of corrupting the <i>e</i> and the <i>i</i> into the sound of <i>a</i>
+or <i>u</i>, in the words ability, humility, charity, &amp;c.; for
+how often is the ear wrung by such barbarisms as,
+humi<i>lutty</i>, civi<i>lutty</i>, qua<i>laty</i>, quan<i>taty</i>, cru<i>alty</i>, char<i>aty</i>,
+human<i>aty</i>, barbar<i>aty</i>, horr<i>uble</i>, terr<i>uble</i>, and so
+on, <i>ad infinitum!</i>&mdash;an uncouth practice, to which
+nothing is comparable, except pronouncing <i>yalla</i> for
+yellow.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />VIII.</div>
+
+<p>There is in some quarters a bad mode prevalent of
+pronouncing the plural of such words as <i>face</i>, <i>place</i>,
+&amp;c., <i>fazes</i>, <i>plazes</i>, whilst the plural of <i>price</i> seems
+everywhere subject to the same strange mutation. The
+words should be <i>faces</i>, <i>places</i>, <i>prices</i>, without any
+softening of the <i>c</i> into <i>z</i>. There is, too, an ugly fashion
+of pronouncing the <i>ng</i>, when terminating a word or
+syllable, as <i>we</i> pronounce the same combination of
+letters in the word <i>finger</i>, and making such words as
+"singer," "ringer," &amp;c., rhyme with <i>linger</i>. Sometimes
+the double <i>o</i> is elongated into the sound which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</a></span>
+we give to that dipthong in "room," "fool," "moon,"
+&amp;c., which has a very bad effect in such words as
+<i>book</i>, <i>look</i>, <i>nook</i>, <i>took</i>, &amp;c.; and sometimes it is
+contracted into the sound of short <i>u</i>, making "foot,"
+and some other words, rhyme with <i>but</i>.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />IX.</div>
+
+<p>And having remarked on the <i>lingering</i> pronunciation,
+it is but fair to notice a defect, the reverse of
+this, namely, that of omitting the final <i>g</i> in such
+words as <i>saying</i>, <i>going</i>, <i>shilling</i>, &amp;c., and pronouncing
+them "sayin," "goin," "shillin." This is so common
+an error that it generally escapes notice, but is a
+greater blemish, where we have a right to look for
+perfection, than the peculiarities of the provinces in
+those who reside there.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />X.</div>
+
+<p>It is also a common fault to add a gratuitous <i>r</i> to
+words ending with a vowel, such as Emma<i>r</i>, Louisa<i>r</i>,
+Julia<i>r</i>, and to make <i>draw</i>, <i>law</i>, <i>saw</i>, <i>flaw</i>, with all
+others of the same class, rhyme with <i>war;</i> to omit
+the <i>r</i> in such words as <i>corks</i>, <i>forks</i>, <i>curtains</i>, <i>morsel</i>,
+&amp;c.; in the word <i>perhaps</i>, when they conscientiously
+<i>pronounce</i> the <i>h;</i> and sometimes in <i>Paris;</i> or to convert
+it into the sound of a <i>y</i> when it comes between
+two vowels, as in the name <i>Harriet</i>, and in the words
+<i>superior</i>, <i>interior</i>, &amp;c., frequently pronounced <i>Aah-yet</i>,
+<i>su-pe-yor</i>, <i>in-te-yor</i>, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</a></span>&amp;c.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XI.</div>
+
+<p>There is a vicious mode of amalgamating the final
+<i>s</i> of a word (and sometimes the final <i>c</i>, when preceded
+and followed by a vowel) with the first letter of the
+next word, if that letter happens to be a <i>y</i>, in such a
+manner as to produce the sound of <i>sh</i> or of <i>usu</i> in
+<i>usual;</i> as, "A <i>nishe</i> young man," "What <i>makesh</i>
+you laugh?" "If he <i>offendsh</i> you, don't speak to
+him," "<i>Ash</i> you please," "Not <i>jush</i> yet," "We
+always <i>passh</i> your house in going to call on <i>Missh</i>
+Yates,&mdash;she lives near <i>Palash</i> Yard;" and so on
+through all the possibilities of such a combination.
+This is decided, unmitigated <i>cockneyism</i>, having its
+parallel in nothing except the broken English of the
+sons of Abraham; and to adopt it in conversation is
+certainly "not speaking like a Christian." The effect
+of this pronunciation on the ear is as though the
+mouth of the speaker were filled with froth, which
+impedes the utterance, and gives the semblance of a
+defect where nature had kindly intended perfection;
+but the radical cause of this, and of many other mispronunciations,
+is the carelessness, sometimes the
+ignorance, of teachers, who permit children to read
+and speak in a slovenly manner, without opening
+their teeth, or taking any pains to acquire a distinct
+articulation.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XII.</div>
+
+<p>Whilst we are on the subject of Prosody, we must
+not omit to mention the vicious pronunciation occasionally
+given to the words <i>new</i>, <i>due</i>, <i>Tuesday</i>, <i>stupid</i>,
+and a few others, sometimes corrupted into <i>noo</i>,
+<i>doo</i>, <i>Toosday</i>, <i>stoopid</i>, &amp;c., by way of refinement,
+perhaps, for lips which are too delicate to utter the
+clear, broad, English <i>u</i>.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XIII.</div>
+
+<p>Never say "Cut it in <i>half</i>," for this you cannot do
+unless you could <i>annihilate one</i> half. You may "cut
+it in two," or "cut it in halves," or "cut it through,"
+or "divide it," but no human ability will enable you
+to <i>cut it in half</i>.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XIV.</div>
+
+<p>Never speak of "lots" and "loads" of things.
+Young men allow themselves a diffusive license of
+speech, and of quotation, which has introduced many
+words into colloquial style that do not at all tend to
+improve or dignify the language, and which, when
+heard from <i>ladies</i>' lips, become absolute vulgarisms.
+A young man may talk recklessly of "lots of bargains,"
+"lots of money," "lots of fellows," "lots of
+fun," &amp;c., but a lady may <i>not</i>. Man may indulge in
+any latitude of expression within the bounds of sense
+and decorum, but woman has a narrower range,&mdash;even
+her mirth must be subjected to rule. It may be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</a></span>
+<i>na&iuml;ve</i>, but must never be grotesque. It is not that we
+would have <i>primness</i> in the sex, but we would have
+refinement. Women are the purer and the more
+ornamental part of life, and when <i>they</i> degenerate, the
+Poetry of Life is gone.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XV.</div>
+
+<p>"Loads" is a word quite as objectional as "lots,"
+unless it can be reduced to a load of <i>something</i>, such
+as a <i>ship</i>-load, a <i>wagon</i>-load, a <i>cart</i>-load, a <i>horse</i>-load,
+&amp;c. We often hear such expressions as "loads
+of shops," "loads of authors," "loads of compliments;"
+but as shops, authors, compliments, are
+things not usually piled up into loads, either for ships
+or horses, we cannot discover the propriety of the
+application.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XVI.</div>
+
+<p>Some people, guiltless of those absurdities, commit
+a great error in the use of the word <i>quantity</i>, applying
+it to things of <i>number</i>, as "a quantity of friends,"
+"a quantity of ships," "a quantity of houses," &amp;c.
+<i>Quantity</i> can be applied only where <i>bulk</i> is indicated,
+as "a quantity of land," "a quantity of timber;" but
+we cannot say, "a quantity of fields," "a quantity of
+trees," because <i>trees</i> and <i>fields</i> are specific individualities.
+Or we may apply it where individualities are
+taken in the gross, without reference to modes, as "a
+quantity of luggage," "a quantity of furniture;" but
+we cannot say "a quantity of boxes," "a quantity of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</a></span>
+chairs and tables," for the same reason which is given
+in the former instances. We also apply the term
+<i>quantity</i> to those things of number which are too
+minute to be taken separately, as "a quantity of
+beans," "a quantity of oats," &amp;c., &amp;c.</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'><br />XVII.</div>
+
+<p>Avoid favorite words and phrases; they betray a
+poverty of language or of imagination not creditable
+to a cultivated intellect. Some people are so unfortunate
+as to find all things <i>vulgar</i> that come "betwixt
+the wind and their nobility;" others find them <i>disgusting</i>.
+Some are always <i>anticipating</i>, others are
+always <i>appreciating</i>. Multitudes are <i>aristocratic</i> in
+all their relations, other multitudes are as <i>distingu&eacute;s</i>.
+These two words are chiefly patronized by those whose
+pretensions in such respects are the most questionable.
+To some timid spirits, born under malignant influences
+no doubt, most things present an <i>awful</i> appearance,
+even though they come in shapes so insignificant
+as a cold day or an aching finger. But, thanks to
+that happy diversity of Nature which throws light as
+well as shadow into the human character, there are
+minds of brighter vision and more cheerful temperament,
+who behold all things <i>splendid</i>, <i>magnificent</i>,
+down to a cup of small beer, or a half-penny orange.
+Some people have a grandiloquent force of expression,
+thereby imparting a <i>tremendous</i> or <i>thundering</i>
+character even to little things. This is truly carrying<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</a></span>
+their conceptions into the sublime,&mdash;sometimes a
+step beyond.</p>
+
+<p>We have, however, no intention of particularizing
+<i>all</i> the "pet" phrases which salute the ear; but the
+enumeration of a few of them may make the <i>candid</i>
+culprit smile, and avoid those trifling absurdities for
+the future.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>We would, under favor, suggest to the reader the
+advantage of not relying too confidently on knowledge
+acquired by habit and example alone. There are
+many words in constant use which are perverted from
+their original meanings; and if we were to dip into
+some standard dictionary occasionally, search out the
+true meanings of words with which we have fancied
+ourselves acquainted, and convict ourselves of <i>all</i> the
+errors we have been committing in following the
+crowd, our surprise, perhaps, would equal that of
+Moli&egrave;re's <i>Bourgeois Gentilhomme</i> when he discovered
+that he had been talking <i>prose</i> for forty years.</p>
+
+<p>The words <i>feasible</i>, <i>ostensible</i>, <i>obnoxious</i>, <i>apparent</i>,
+<i>obtain</i>, <i>refrain</i>, <i>domesticated</i>, and <i>centre</i>, are expressions
+which, nine times out of ten, are misapplied,
+besides a host of others whose propriety is never
+questioned, so firmly has custom riveted the bonds of
+ignorance.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In closing this little volume, the writer begs leave
+to say that the remarks offered are intended only as
+"Hints," which they who desire perfection may
+easily improve, by a little exercise of the understanding,
+and a reference to more extensive sources, into a
+competent knowledge of their own tongue; also as
+<i>warnings</i> to the careless, that their lapses do not pass
+so unobserved as they are in the habit of supposing.</p>
+
+<p>Though many of the syntactical errors herein mentioned
+are to be found in the works of some of our
+best writers, they are <i>errors</i> nevertheless, and stand
+as blemishes upon the productions of their genius,
+like unsightly excrescences upon a lovely skin.
+Genius is above grammar, and this conviction may
+inspire in some bosoms an undue contempt for the
+latter. But grammar is a constituent part of good
+education, and a neglect of it <i>might</i> argue a <i>want</i> of
+education, which would, perhaps, be mortifying. It
+is an old axiom that "civility costs nothing," and
+surely grammatical purity need not cost <i>much</i> to
+people disposed to pay a little attention to it, and who
+have received a respectable education already. It
+adds a grace to eloquence, and raises the standard of
+language where eloquence is not.</p>
+
+<p>A handsome man or handsome woman is not improved
+by a shabby or slatternly attire; so the best
+abilities are shown to a disadvantage through a style
+marked by illiteracies.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</a></span></p>
+<h2>PART IV.</h2>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>MISTAKES AND IMPROPRIETIES</h2>
+
+<p>IN SPEAKING AND WRITING CORRECTED.</p>
+
+
+<p>1. <span class="smcap">Have</span> you <i>learned</i> French yet? say <i>learnt</i>, as
+<i>learned</i> is now used only as an adjective,&mdash;as, <i>a
+learned man</i>. Pronounce <i>learned</i> in <i>two</i> syllables.</p>
+
+<p>2. The business would suit any one who <i>enjoys
+bad health</i> [from an advertisement in a London newspaper];
+say, any one <i>in a delicate state of health</i>, or,
+<i>whose health is but indifferent</i>.</p>
+
+<p>3. "We have no <i>corporeal</i> punishment here," said
+a schoolmaster once to the author of this little work.
+<i>Corporeal</i> is opposed to <i>spiritual;</i> say, <i>corporal</i> punishment.
+<i>Corporeal</i> means <i>having a body</i>. The Almighty
+is not a <i>corporeal</i> being, but a <i>spirit</i>, as St.
+John tells us.</p>
+
+<p>4. That was a <i>notable</i> circumstance. Pronounce
+the first syllable of <i>notable</i> as <i>no</i> in <i>notion</i>. Mrs.
+Johnson is a <i>notable</i> housewife; that is to say, <i>careful</i>.
+Pronounce the first syllable of <i>notable</i> as <i>not</i> in
+<i>Nottingham</i>.</p>
+
+<p>5. Put an <i>advertisement</i> in the "Times." Pronounce<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</a></span>
+<i>advertisement</i> with the accent on <i>ver</i>, and not
+on <i>tise</i>.</p>
+
+<p>6. He <i>rose up</i> and left the room; leave out <i>up</i>.</p>
+
+<p>7. You have <i>sown</i> it very badly; say, <i>sewed</i> it.</p>
+
+<p>8. Mr. Dupont <i>learnt</i> me French; say, <i>taught</i>.
+The <i>master teaches</i>, but the <i>pupil learns</i>.</p>
+
+<p>9. John and Henry both read well, but John is the
+<i>best</i> reader; say, the <i>better</i> reader, as <i>best</i> can only
+be said when <i>three or more persons</i> or objects are
+compared.</p>
+
+<p>10. The <i>two first</i> pupils I had; say, the <i>first two</i>.</p>
+
+<p>11. He has <i>mistook</i> his true interest; say, <i>mistaken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>12. Have you <i>lit</i> the fire, Mary? say, <i>lighted</i>.</p>
+
+<p>13. The doctor <i>has not yet came;</i> say, <i>has not yet
+come</i>.</p>
+
+<p>14. I have always <i>gave</i> him good advice; say,
+<i>given</i>.</p>
+
+<p>15. To be is an <i>auxiliary</i> verb. Pronounce <i>auxiliary</i>
+in <i>five</i> syllables, sounding the second <i>i</i>, and <i>not
+in four</i>, as we so frequently hear it.</p>
+
+<p>16. <i>Celery</i> is a pleasant edible; pronounce <i>celery</i>
+as it is written, and <i>not salary</i>.</p>
+
+<p>17. Are you at <i>leisure?</i> pronounce <i>lei</i> in <i>leisure</i>
+the same as <i>Lei</i> in <i>Leith</i>, and <i>not</i> so as to rhyme
+with <i>measure</i>.</p>
+
+<p>18. Have you seen <i>the Miss Browns</i> lately? say,
+<i>the Misses Brown</i>.</p>
+
+<p>19. You have soon <i>forgot</i> my kindness; say, <i>forgotten</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>20. He keeps <i>his coach;</i> say, <i>his carriage</i>.</p>
+
+<p>21. John is my <i>oldest</i> brother; say, <i>eldest</i>. <i>Elder</i>
+and <i>eldest</i> are applied to <i>persons</i>,&mdash;<i>older</i> and <i>oldest</i>
+to <i>things</i>.</p>
+
+<p>22. Disputes have frequently <i>arose</i> on that subject;
+say, <i>arisen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>23. The cloth was <i>wove</i> in a very short time; say,
+<i>woven</i>.</p>
+
+<p>24. French is <i>spoke</i> in every state in Europe; say,
+<i>spoken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>25. He writes as the best authors would have
+<i>wrote</i>, had they <i>writ</i> on the same subject; say, would
+have <i>written</i>,&mdash;had they <i>written</i>.</p>
+
+<p>26. I prefer the <i>yolk</i> of an egg to the white; say,
+<i>yelk</i>, and sound the <i>l</i>.</p>
+
+<p>27. He is now very <i>decrepid;</i> say, <i>decrepit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>28. I am very fond of <i>sparrowgrass;</i> say, <i>asparagus</i>,
+and pronounce it with the accent on <i>par</i>.</p>
+
+<p>29. You are very <i>mischievous</i>. Pronounce <i>mischievous</i>
+with the accent on <i>mis</i>, and <i>not on chie</i>, and
+do not say <i>mischievious</i>.</p>
+
+<p>30. It was very <i>acceptable</i>. Pronounce <i>acceptable</i>
+with the accent on <i>cept</i>, and <i>not on ac</i>, as we so often
+hear it.</p>
+
+<p>31. "No conversation be permitted in the Reading
+Room to the interruption of the company present.
+<i>Neither Smoking or Refreshments allowed</i>" [from
+the prospectus of a "Literary and Scientific Institution"];<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</a></span>
+insert <i>can</i> after <i>conversation</i>, and say, <i>neither
+smoking nor refreshments</i>.</p>
+
+<p>32. <i>No extras or vacations</i>[from the prospectus of
+a schoolmistress near London]; say, <i>neither extras
+nor vacations</i>.</p>
+
+<p>33. He is very covetous. Pronounce <i>covetous</i> as
+if it were written <i>covet us</i>, and <i>not covetyus</i>, as is
+almost universally the case.</p>
+
+<p>34. I intend to <i>summons</i> him; say, <i>summon</i>. <i>Summons</i>
+is a <i>noun</i>, and <i>not a verb</i>.</p>
+
+<p>35. Dearly <i>beloved</i> brethren. Pronounce <i>beloved</i>
+in <i>three</i> syllables, and <i>never in two</i>, as some clergymen
+do.</p>
+
+<p>36. He is now <i>forsook</i> by every one; say, <i>forsaken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>37. Not <i>as I know;</i> say, <i>that I know</i>.</p>
+
+<p>38. He came <i>for to do</i> it; leave out <i>for</i>.</p>
+
+<p>39. They have just <i>rose</i> from the table; say, <i>risen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>40. He is quite <i>as good as me;</i> say, <i>as good as I</i>.</p>
+
+<p>41. <i>Many an one</i> has done the same; say, <i>many a
+one</i>. <i>A</i>, and <i>not an</i>, is used before the <i>long sound of
+u</i>, that is to say, when <i>u</i> forms <i>a distinct syllable of
+itself</i>, as, <i>a unit</i>, <i>union</i>, <i>a university</i>. It is also used
+before <i>eu</i>, as, <i>a euphony;</i> and likewise before the
+word <i>ewe</i>, as, <i>a ewe</i>. We should also say, <i>a youth</i>,
+not <i>an youth</i>.</p>
+
+<p>42. <i>Many people</i> think so; say, <i>many persons</i>, as
+<i>people</i> means <i>a nation</i>.</p>
+
+<p>43. "When our ships sail among the <i>people</i> of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</a></span>
+Eastern islands, <i>those people</i> do not ask for gold,&mdash;'iron!
+iron!' is the call." [From a work by a peer
+of literary celebrity.] Say, among the <i>inhabitants;</i>
+and, instead of <i>those people</i>, which is ungrammatical,
+say, <i>those persons</i>.</p>
+
+<p>44. <i>Was you</i> reading just now? say, <i>were you</i>.</p>
+
+<p>45. I have <i>not had no dinner yet;</i> say, <i>I have had
+no dinner yet</i>, or, I have <i>not yet had my dinner</i>, or,
+<i>any dinner</i>.</p>
+
+<p>46. She will <i>never be no taller;</i> say, she will <i>never
+be taller</i>, or, she will <i>never be any taller</i>.</p>
+
+<p>47. I <i>see him</i> last Monday; say, <i>saw him</i>.</p>
+
+<p>48. He was <i>averse from</i> such a proceeding; say,
+<i>averse to</i>.</p>
+
+<p>49. He has <i>wore</i> his boots three months; say,
+<i>worn</i>.</p>
+
+<p>50. He has <i>trod</i> on my toes; say, <i>trodden</i>.</p>
+
+<p>51. Have you <i>shook</i> the cloth? say, <i>shaken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>52. I have <i>rang</i> several times; say, <i>rung</i>.</p>
+
+<p>53. I <i>knowed</i> him at once; say, <i>knew</i>.</p>
+
+<p>54. He has <i>growed</i> very much; say, <i>grown</i>.</p>
+
+<p>55. George has <i>fell</i> down stairs; say, <i>fallen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>56. He has <i>chose</i> a very poor pattern; say, <i>chosen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>57. They have <i>broke</i> a window; say, <i>broken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>58. Give me <i>them books;</i> say, <i>those books</i>.</p>
+
+<p>59. My brother gave me <i>them there pictures;</i> say,
+gave me <i>those pictures</i>.</p>
+
+<p>60. Whose are <i>these here books?</i> say, <i>these books</i>.</p>
+
+<p>61. The men <i>which</i> we saw; say, <i>whom</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>62. The books <i>what</i> you have; say, <i>which</i>, or <i>that</i>.</p>
+
+<p>63. The boy <i>as is</i> reading; say, <i>who is</i> reading.</p>
+
+<p>64. The pond is <i>froze;</i> say, <i>frozen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>65. He has <i>took</i> my slate; say, <i>taken</i>.</p>
+
+<p>66. He has often <i>stole</i> money from him; say, <i>stolen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>67. They have <i>drove</i> very fast; say, <i>driven</i>.</p>
+
+<p>68. I have <i>rode</i> many miles to-day; say, <i>ridden</i>.</p>
+
+<p>69. You cannot <i>catch</i> him; pronounce <i>catch</i> so as
+to rhyme with <i>match</i>, and not <i>ketch</i>.</p>
+
+<p>70. Who has <i>got</i> my slate? leave out <i>got</i>.</p>
+
+<p>71. What are you <i>doing of?</i> leave out <i>of</i>.</p>
+
+<p>72. <i>If I was rich</i> I would buy a carriage; say, <i>If
+I were</i>.</p>
+
+<p>73. We have all within us an <i>impetus</i> to sin; pronounce
+<i>impetus</i> with the accent on <i>im</i>, and not on <i>pe</i>,
+as is very often the case.</p>
+
+<p>74. He may go to the <i>antipodes</i> for what I care;
+pronounce <i>antipodes</i> with the accent on <i>tip</i>, and let
+<i>des</i> rhyme with <i>ease</i>. It is a word of <i>four</i> syllables,
+and <i>not of three</i>, as many persons make it.</p>
+
+<p>75. <i>Vouchsafe</i>, a word seldom used, but, when
+used, the first syllable should rhyme with <i>pouch</i>.
+<i>Never say, vousafe.</i></p>
+
+<p>76. Ginger is a good <i>stomachic;</i> pronounce <i>stomachic</i>
+with the accent on <i>mach</i>, sounding this syllable
+<i>mak</i>, and <i>not mat</i>, as is often the case.</p>
+
+<p>77. The land in those parts is very <i>fertile;</i> pronounce
+<i>fertile</i> so as to rhyme with <i>pill</i>. The <i>ile</i> in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[103]</a></span>
+all words must be sounded <i>ill</i>, with the exception of
+<i>exile</i>, <i>senile</i>, <i>gentile</i>, <i>reconcile</i>, and <i>camomile</i>, in which
+<i>ile</i> rhymes with <i>mile</i>.</p>
+
+<p>78. <i>It is surprising the fatigue he undergoes;</i> say,
+<i>The fatigue he undergoes is surprising</i>.</p>
+
+<p>79. <i>Benefited;</i> often spelt <i>benefitted</i>, but <i>incorrectly</i>.</p>
+
+<p>80. <i>Gather</i> up the fragments; pronounce <i>gather</i> so
+as to rhyme with <i>lather</i>, and <i>not gether</i>.</p>
+
+<p>81. I <i>propose</i> going to town next week; say, <i>purpose</i>.</p>
+
+<p>82. If I <i>am not mistaken</i>, you are in the wrong;
+say, If I <i>mistake not</i>.</p>
+
+<p>83. <i>Direct</i> your letters to me at Mr. Jones's; say,
+<i>Address</i> your letters.</p>
+
+<p>84. Wales is a very <i>mountainious</i> country; say,
+<i>mountainous</i>, and place the accent on <i>moun</i>.</p>
+
+<p>85. Of two evils choose <i>the least;</i> say, <i>the less</i>.</p>
+
+<p>86. <i>Exag'gerate;</i> pronounce <i>exad'gerate</i>, and <i>do
+not sound agger</i> as in the word <i>dagger</i>, which is a
+very common mistake.</p>
+
+<p>87. He knows <i>little or nothing of Latin;</i> say,
+<i>little, if anything, of Latin</i>.</p>
+
+<p>88. He keeps a <i>chaise;</i> pronounce it <i>shaise</i>, and
+not <i>shay</i>. It has a regular plural, <i>chaises</i>.</p>
+
+<p>88. The <i>drought</i> lasted a long time; pronounce
+<i>drought</i> so as to rhyme with <i>snout</i>, and not <i>drowth</i>.</p>
+
+<p>90. The man was <i>hung</i> last week; say, <i>hanged;</i>
+but say, I am fond of <i>hung beef</i>. <i>Hang, to take away
+life by hanging</i>, is a regular verb.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[104]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>91. We <i>conversed together</i> on the subject; leave
+out <i>together</i>, as it is implied in <i>conversed</i>, <i>con</i> being
+equivalent to <i>with</i>, that is to say, <i>We talked with each
+other</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>92. The affair was <i>compromised;</i> pronounce <i>compromised</i>
+in three syllables, and place the accent on
+<i>com</i>, sounding <i>mised</i> like <i>prized</i>. The word has nothing
+to do with <i>promised</i>. The noun <i>compromise</i> is
+accented like <i>compromised</i>, but <i>mise</i> must be pronounced
+<i>mice</i>.</p>
+
+<p>93. A <i>steam-engine;</i> pronounce <i>engine</i> with <i>en</i> as
+in <i>pen</i>, and <i>not like in</i>, and <i>gine</i> like <i>gin</i>.</p>
+
+<p>94. Numbers were <i>massacred;</i> pronounce <i>massacred</i>
+with the accent on <i>mas</i>, and <i>red</i> like <i>erd</i>, as if
+<i>mas'saker'd</i>, never <i>mas'sacreed</i>.</p>
+
+<p>95. The king of Israel and the king of Judah sat
+<i>either of them</i> on his throne; say, <i>each of them</i>.
+<i>Either</i> signifies the <i>one</i> or the <i>other</i>, but <i>not both</i>.
+<i>Each</i> relates to <i>two or more objects</i>, and signifies <i>both
+of the two</i>, or <i>every one of any number taken singly</i>.
+<i>Never</i> say "<i>either</i> of the three," but "<i>each</i> or <i>any
+one</i> of the three."</p>
+
+<p>96. A <i>respite</i> was granted the convict; pronounce
+<i>respite</i> with the accent on <i>res</i>, and sound <i>pite</i> as <i>pit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>97. He soon <i>returned back;</i> leave out <i>back</i>, which
+is implied by <i>re</i> in <i>returned</i>.</p>
+
+<p>98. The <i>horizon</i> is the line that terminates the
+view; pronounce <i>horizon</i> with the accent on <i>ri</i>, and
+not on <i>ho</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[105]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>99. She has <i>sang</i> remarkably well; say, <i>sung</i>.</p>
+
+<p>100. He had <i>sank</i> before assistance arrived; say,
+<i>sunk</i>.</p>
+
+<p>101. I have often <i>swam</i> across the Tyne; say,
+<i>swum</i>.</p>
+
+<p>102. I found my friend better than I expected <i>to
+have found him;</i> say, <i>to find him</i>.</p>
+
+<p>103. I intended <i>to have written</i> a letter yesterday;
+say, <i>to write</i>, as however long it now is since I thought
+of writing, "<i>to write</i>" was then present to me, and
+must still be considered as present when I bring back
+that time and the thoughts of it.</p>
+
+<p>104. His death <i>shall be</i> long regretted [from a
+notice of a death in a newspaper]; say, <i>will be</i> long,
+&amp;c. <i>Shall</i> and <i>will</i> are often confounded; the following
+rule, however, may be of use to the reader.
+Mere <i>futurity</i> is expressed by <i>shall</i> in the <i>first</i> person,
+and by <i>will</i> in the <i>second</i> and <i>third;</i> the <i>determination</i>
+of the speaker by <i>will</i> in the <i>first</i>, and <i>shall</i> in
+the <i>second</i> and <i>third;</i> as, I <span class="smcap">will</span> go to-morrow, I
+<span class="smcap">shall</span> go to-morrow. N. B. The latter sentence
+simply expresses a future event; the former expresses
+my determination.</p>
+
+<p>105. "<i>Without</i> the grammatical form of a word
+can be recognized at a glance, little progress can be
+made in reading the language" [from a very popular
+work on the study of the Latin language]; say, <i>Unless</i>
+the grammatical, &amp;c. The use of <i>without</i> for
+<i>unless</i> is a very common mistake.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[106]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>106. Have you begun <i>substraction</i> yet? say, <i>subtraction</i>.</p>
+
+<p>107. He claimed admission to the <i>chiefest</i> offices;
+say, <i>chief</i>. <i>Chief</i>, <i>right</i>, <i>supreme</i>, <i>correct</i>, <i>true</i>, <i>universal</i>,
+<i>perfect</i>, <i>consummate</i>, <i>extreme</i>, &amp;c., <i>imply</i> the
+superlative degree without <i>est</i> or <i>most</i>. In language
+sublime or impassioned, however, the word <i>perfect</i>
+requires the superlative form to give it effect. A
+lover, enraptured with his mistress, would naturally
+call her the <i>most perfect</i> of her sex.</p>
+
+<p>108. The ship had <i>sprang</i> a leak; say, <i>sprung</i>.</p>
+
+<p>109. I <i>had rather</i> do it now; say, I <i>would rather</i>.</p>
+
+<p>110. He was served with a <i>subp&oelig;na;</i> pronounce
+<i>subp&oelig;na</i> with the accent on <i>p&oelig;</i>, which you will sound
+like <i>tea</i>, and sound the <i>b</i> distinctly. <i>Never pronounce
+the word soopee'na.</i></p>
+
+<p>111. I have not travelled <i>this twenty years;</i> say,
+<i>these twenty years</i>.</p>
+
+<p>112. He is <i>very much the gentleman;</i> say, He is <i>a
+very gentlemanly man</i>, or <i>fellow</i>.</p>
+
+<p>113. The <i>yellow</i> part of an egg is very nourishing;
+<i>never</i> pronounce <i>yellow</i> like <i>tallow</i>, which we so often
+hear.</p>
+
+<p>114. We are going to the <i>zoological</i> gardens; pronounce
+<i>zoological</i> in <i>five</i> syllables, and place the
+accent on <i>log</i> in <i>logical</i>. Sound <i>log</i> like <i>lodge</i>, and
+<i>the first two o's in distinct syllables</i>. <i>Never</i> make
+<i>zool</i> <i>one</i> syllable.</p>
+
+<p>115. He always preaches <i>extempore;</i> pronounce<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[107]</a></span>
+<i>extempore</i> in <i>four</i> syllables, with the accent on <i>tem</i>,
+and <i>never in three</i>, making <i>pore</i> to rhyme with <i>sore</i>.</p>
+
+<p>116. <i>Naught</i> and <i>aught;</i> <i>never</i> spell these words
+<i>nought</i> and <i>ought</i>. There is no such word as <i>nought</i>,
+and <i>ought</i> is a verb.</p>
+
+<p>117. Allow me to <i>suggest;</i> pronounce <i>sug</i> so as to
+rhyme with <i>mug</i>, and <i>gest</i> like <i>jest</i>. Never <i>sudjest</i>.</p>
+
+<p>118. The Emperor of Russia is a <i>formidable</i> personage;
+pronounce <i>formidable</i> with the accent on
+<i>for</i>, and <i>not on mid</i>, as is often the case.</p>
+
+<p>119. Before the words <i>heir</i>, <i>herb</i>, <i>honest</i>, <i>honor</i>,
+<i>hostler</i>, <i>hour</i>, <i>humble</i>, and <i>humor</i>, and their compounds,
+instead of the article <i>a</i>, we make use of
+<i>an</i>, as the <i>h</i> is not sounded; likewise before words
+beginning with <i>h</i> that are <i>not</i> accented on the <i>first
+syllable</i>, such as <i>heroic</i>, <i>historical</i>, <i>hypothesis</i>, &amp;c., as,
+<i>an heroic action</i>, <i>an historical work</i>, <i>an hypothesis</i>
+that can scarcely be allowed. N. B. The letter <i>h</i> is
+seldom mute at the beginning of a word; but from
+the negligence of tutors and the inattention of pupils
+many persons have become almost incapable of acquiring
+its just and full pronunciation. It is, therefore,
+incumbent on teachers to be particularly careful
+to inculcate a clear and distinct utterance of this
+sound.</p>
+
+<p>120. He was <i>such an extravagant young man</i> that
+he soon spent his whole patrimony; say, <i>so extravagant
+a young man</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[108]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>121. I saw the <i>slough</i> of a snake; pronounce
+<i>slough</i> so as to rhyme with <i>rough</i>.</p>
+
+<p>122. She is <i>quite the lady;</i> say, She is <i>very lady-like
+in her demeanor</i>.</p>
+
+<p>123. He is <i>seldom or ever</i> out of town; say, <i>seldom,
+if ever</i>, out of town.</p>
+
+<p>124. Death <i>unloosed</i> his chains; say, <i>loosed</i> his
+chains.</p>
+
+<p>125. It is dangerous to walk <i>of a</i> slippery morning;
+say, <i>on a</i> slippery morning.</p>
+
+<p>126. He who makes himself famous by his eloquence,
+illustrates his origin, let it be <i>never so mean;</i>
+say, <i>ever so mean</i>.</p>
+
+<p>127. His fame is acknowledged <i>through</i> Europe;
+say, <i>throughout</i> Europe.</p>
+
+<p>128. The bank of the river is frequently <i>overflown;</i>
+say, <i>overflowed</i>.</p>
+
+<p>129. <i>Previous to</i> my leaving England I called on
+his lordship; say, <i>previously to</i> my leaving, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>130. I doubt <i>if this</i> will ever reach you; say,
+<i>whether this</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>131. He was <i>exceeding kind</i> to me; say, <i>exceedingly
+kind</i>.</p>
+
+<p>132. I lost <i>near</i> twenty pounds; say, <i>nearly</i>.</p>
+
+<p>133. <i>Bills are requested to be paid quarterly;</i> say,
+<i>It is requested that bills be paid quarterly</i>.</p>
+
+<p>134. It was <i>no use asking</i> him any more questions;
+say, <i>of no use to ask him</i>, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[109]</a></span>&amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>135. The Americans said they <i>had no right</i> to pay
+taxes; say, they <i>were under no obligation</i> to pay, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>136. I <i>throwed</i> my box away, and <i>never took no
+more snuff;</i> say, <ins title="Transcriber's Note: this was italicized in original text">I</ins> <i>threw</i>, &amp;c., and <i>took snuff no more</i>.</p>
+
+<p>137. She was <i>endowed</i> with an exquisite taste for
+music; say, <i>endued</i> with, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>138. I intend to <i>stop</i> at home; say, to <i>stay</i>.</p>
+
+<p>139. At this time I <i>grew</i> my own corn; say, I
+<i>raised</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>140. He <i>was</i> no sooner departed than they expelled
+his officers; say, he <i>had</i> no sooner, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>141. He <i>was</i> now retired from public business;
+say, <i>had</i> now retired, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>142. They <i>were</i> embarked in a common cause;
+say, <i>had</i> embarked, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>143. Hostilities <i>were</i> now become habitual; say,
+<i>had</i> now become.</p>
+
+<p>144. Brutus and Aruns killed <i>one another;</i> say,
+<i>each other</i>.</p>
+
+<p>145. Pray, sir, who <i>may you be?</i> say, who <i>are you?</i></p>
+
+<p>146. Their character as a warlike people <i>is</i> much
+degenerated; say, <i>has</i> much, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>147. He is gone on an <i>errand;</i> pronounce <i>errand</i>
+as it is written, and not <i>arrant</i>.</p>
+
+<p>148. In a popular work on arithmetic we find the
+following sum,&mdash;"If for 7<i>s.</i> 8<i>d.</i>, I can buy 9 lbs. of
+raisins, <i>how much</i> can I purchase for &pound;56 16<i>s.?</i>"
+say, "<i>what quantity</i> can I," &amp;c. Who would think
+of saying "<i>how much raisins?</i>"<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[110]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>149. Be very careful in distinguishing between
+<i>indite</i> and <i>indict;</i> <i>key</i> and <i>quay;</i> <i>principle</i> and <i>principal;</i>
+<i>check</i> and <i>cheque;</i> <i>marshal</i> and <i>martial;</i> <i>counsel</i>
+and <i>council;</i> <i>counsellor</i> and <i>councillor;</i> <i>fort</i> and
+<i>forte;</i> <i>draft</i> and <i>draught;</i> <i>place</i> and <i>plaice;</i> <i>stake</i>
+and <i>steak;</i> <i>satire</i> and <i>satyr;</i> <i>stationery</i> and <i>stationary;</i>
+<i>ton</i> and <i>tun;</i> <i>levy</i> and <i>levee;</i> <i>foment</i> and <i>ferment;</i>
+<i>fomentation</i> and <i>fermentation;</i> <i>petition</i> and
+<i>partition;</i> <i>practice</i> and <i>practise;</i> <i>Francis</i> and <i>Frances;</i>
+<i>dose</i> and <i>doze;</i> <i>diverse</i> and <i>divers;</i> <i>device</i> and
+<i>devise;</i> <i>wary</i> and <i>weary;</i> <i>salary</i> and <i>celery;</i> <i>radish</i>
+and <i>reddish;</i> <i>treble</i> and <i>triple;</i> <i>broach</i> and <i>brooch;</i>
+<i>ingenious</i> and <i>ingenuous;</i> <i>prophesy</i> and <i>prophecy;</i>
+<i>fondling</i> and <i>foundling;</i> <i>lightning</i> and <i>lightening;</i>
+<i>genus</i> and <i>genius;</i> <i>desert</i> and <i>dessert;</i> <i>currier</i> and
+<i>courier;</i> <i>pillow</i> and <i>pillar;</i> <i>executer</i> and <i>executor;</i>
+<i>suit</i> and <i>suite;</i> <i>ridicule</i> and <i>reticule;</i> <i>lineament</i> and
+<i>liniment;</i> <i>track</i> and <i>tract;</i> <i>lickerish</i> and <i>licorice;</i>
+<i>statute</i> and <i>statue;</i> <i>ordinance</i> and <i>ordnance;</i> <i>lease</i>
+and <i>leash;</i> <i>recourse</i> and <i>resource;</i> <i>straight</i> and <i>strait;</i>
+<i>immerge</i> and <i>emerge;</i> <i>style</i> and <i>stile;</i> <i>compliment</i> and
+<i>complement;</i> <i>bass</i> and <i>base;</i> <i>contagious</i> and <i>contiguous;</i>
+<i>eminent</i> and <i>imminent;</i> <i>eruption</i> and <i>irruption;</i>
+<i>precedent</i> and <i>president;</i> <i>relic</i> and <i>relict</i>.</p>
+
+<p>150. I prefer <i>radishes</i> to <i>cucumbers;</i> pronounce
+<i>radishes</i> exactly as it is spelt, and not <i>redishes</i>, and
+the <i>u</i> in the first syllable of <i>cucumber</i> as in <i>fuel</i>, and
+not as if the word were <i>cowcumber</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[111]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>151. Never pronounce <i>barbarous</i> and <i>grievous</i>,
+<i>bartarious</i> and <i>grievious</i>.</p>
+
+<p>152. The <i>two last</i> chapters are very interesting;
+say, The <i>last two</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>153. The soil on these islands is so very thin, that
+little vegetation is produced upon them <i>beside</i> cocoanut
+trees; say, <i>with the exception of</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>154. He restored it <i>back</i> to the owner; leave out
+<i>back</i>.</p>
+
+<p>155. <i>Here</i>, <i>there</i>, <i>where</i>, are generally better than
+<i>hither</i>, <i>thither</i>, <i>whither</i>, with verbs of motion; as,
+<i>Come here</i>, <i>Go there</i>. N. B. <i>Hither</i>, <i>thither</i>, and
+<i>whither</i>, which were formerly used, are now considered
+stiff and inelegant.</p>
+
+<p>156. <i>As far as I</i> am able to judge, the book is well
+written; say, <i>So far as</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>157. It is doubtful whether he will play <i>fairly or
+no;</i> say, <i>fairly or not</i>.</p>
+
+<p>158. "The Pilgrim's <i>Progress;</i>" pronounce <i>progress</i>,
+<i>prog-ress</i>, not <i>pro-gress</i>.</p>
+
+<p>159. He is a boy of a great <i>spirit;</i> pronounce
+<i>spirit</i> exactly as it is written, and never <i>sperit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>160. The <i>camelopard</i> is the tallest of known animals;
+pronounce <i>camelopard</i> with the accent on the
+<i>second</i> syllable. Never call it <i>camel leopard</i>, as is so
+often heard.</p>
+
+<p>161. He is very <i>awkward;</i> never say, <i>awkard</i>.</p>
+
+<p>162. He ran <i>again</i> me; I stood <i>again</i> the wall;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[112]</a></span>
+instead of <i>again</i>, say <i>against</i>. Do it <i>again</i> the time I
+mentioned; say, <i>by</i> the time, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>163. I always act <i>agreeable</i> to my promise; say,
+<i>agreeably</i>.</p>
+
+<p>164. The study of syntax should be <i>previously</i> to
+that of punctuation; say, <i>previous</i>.</p>
+
+<p>165. No one should incur censure for being tender
+of <i>their</i> reputation; say, of <i>his</i> reputation.</p>
+
+<p>166. They were all <i>drownded;</i> say, <i>drowned</i>.</p>
+
+<p>167. <i>Jalap</i> is of great service; pronounce <i>jalap</i>
+exactly as it is written, <span class="smcap">never</span> <i>jollop</i>.</p>
+
+<p>168. He is gone on a <i>tour;</i> pronounce <i>tour</i> so as
+to rhyme with <i>poor</i>, <i>never</i> like <i>tower</i>.</p>
+
+<p>169. The rain <i>is</i> ceased; say, <i>has</i> ceased.</p>
+
+<p>170. <i>They laid their heads together</i>, and formed
+their plan; say, <i>They held a consultation</i>, &amp;c. <i>Laid
+their heads together</i> savors of <span class="smcap">slang</span>.</p>
+
+<p>171. The <i>chimley</i> wants sweeping; say, <i>chimney</i>.</p>
+
+<p>172. I was walking <i>towards</i> home; pronounce <i>towards</i>
+so as to rhyme with <i>boards</i>. <i>Never</i> say <i>to
+wards</i>.</p>
+
+<p>173. It is a <i>stupenduous</i> work; say, <i>stupendous</i>.</p>
+
+<p>174. A <i>courier</i> is expected from Paris; pronounce
+<i>cou</i> in <i>courier</i> so as to rhyme with <i>too</i>. <i>Never</i> pronounce
+<i>courier</i> like <i>currier</i>.</p>
+
+<p>175. Let each of us mind <i>their</i> own business; say,
+<i>his</i> own business.</p>
+
+<p>176. Is this or that the <i>best</i> road? say, the <i>better</i>
+road.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[113]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>177. <i>Rinse</i> your mouth; pronounce <i>rinse</i> as it is
+written, and <span class="smcap">never</span> <i>rense</i>. "<i>Wrench your mouth</i>,"
+said a fashionable dentist one day to the author of this
+work.</p>
+
+<p>178. The book is not <i>as</i> well printed as it ought to
+be; say, <i>so</i> well printed, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>179. Webster's <i>Dictionary</i> is an admirable work;
+pronounce <i>dictionary</i> as if written <i>dik-shun-a-ry;</i> <i>not</i>,
+as is too commonly the practice, <i>dixonary</i>.</p>
+
+<p>180. Some disaster has certainly <i>befell</i> him; say,
+<i>befallen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>181. She is a pretty <i>creature;</i> never pronounce
+<i>creature</i>, <i>creeter</i>, as is often heard.</p>
+
+<p>182. We went to see the <i>Monument;</i> pronounce
+<i>monument</i> exactly as it is written, and <i>not</i> as many
+pronounce it, <i>moniment</i>.</p>
+
+<p>183. I am very wet, and must go and <i>change myself;</i>
+say, <i>change my clothes</i>.</p>
+
+<p>184. He has had a good <i>education;</i> <i>never</i> say,
+<i>edication</i>, which is often heard, nor <i>edicate</i> for <i>educate</i>.</p>
+
+<p>185. He is much better <i>than me;</i> say, <i>than I</i>.</p>
+
+<p>186. You are stronger <i>than him;</i> say, <i>than he</i>.</p>
+
+<p>187. I had <i>as lief</i> stand; say, I <i>would as soon</i>
+stand.</p>
+
+<p>188. He is <i>not a whit</i> better; say, <i>in no degree</i>
+better.</p>
+
+<p>189. They are <i>at loggerheads;</i> say, <i>at variance</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[114]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>190. His character is <i>undeniable</i>,&mdash;a very common
+expression; say, <i>unexceptionable</i>.</p>
+
+<p>191. Bring me the <i>lantern;</i> never spell <i>lantern</i>,
+<i>lanthorn</i>.</p>
+
+<p>192. The room is twelve <i>foot</i> long, and nine <i>foot</i>
+broad; say, twelve <i>feet</i>, nine <i>feet</i>.</p>
+
+<p>193. He is <i>singular</i>, though <i>regular</i> in his habits,
+and also very <i>particular;</i> beware of leaving out the
+<i>u</i> in <i>singular</i>, <i>regular</i>, and <i>particular</i>, which is a very
+common practice.</p>
+
+<p>194. They are detained <i>at</i> France; say, <i>in</i> France.</p>
+
+<p>195. He lives <i>at</i> London; say, <i>in</i> London, and beware
+of pronouncing <i>London</i>, as many careless persons
+do, <i>Lunnun</i>. <i>At</i> should be applied to small
+towns.</p>
+
+<p>196. No <i>less</i> than fifty persons were there; say,
+No <i>fewer</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>197. <i>Such another</i> mistake, and we shall be ruined;
+say, <i>Another such</i> mistake, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>198. It is <i>some distance</i> from our house; say, <i>at
+some distance</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>199. I shall call <i>upon</i> him; say, <i>on</i> him.</p>
+
+<p>200. He is a Doctor of <i>Medicine;</i> pronounce <i>medicine</i>
+in <i>three</i> syllables, <span class="smcap">never</span> in <i>two</i>.</p>
+
+<p>201. They told me to enter <i>in;</i> leave out <i>in</i>, as it
+is implied in <i>enter</i>.</p>
+
+<p>202. His <i>strength</i> is amazing; never say, <i>strenth</i>.</p>
+
+<p>203. "<i>Mistaken</i> souls, who dream of heaven,"&mdash;this
+is the beginning of a popular hymn; it should be,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[115]</a></span>
+"<i>Mistaking</i> souls," &amp;c. <i>Mistaken wretch</i>, for <i>mistaking
+wretch</i>, is an apostrophe that occurs everywhere
+among our poets, particularly those of the
+stage; the most incorrigible of all, and the most
+likely to fix and disseminate an error of this kind.</p>
+
+<p>204. Give me both <i>of</i> those books; leave out <i>of</i>.</p>
+
+<p>205. Whenever I try to write well, I <i>always</i> find I
+can do it; leave out <i>always</i>, which is unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>206. He plunged <i>down</i> into the stream; leave out
+<i>down</i>.</p>
+
+<p>207. She is the <i>matron;</i> say <i>may-tron</i>, and not
+<i>mat-ron</i>.</p>
+
+<p>208. Give me <i>leave</i> to tell you; <span class="smcap">never</span> say <i>leaf</i> for
+<i>leave</i>.</p>
+
+<p>209. The <i>height</i> is considerable; pronounce <i>height</i>
+so as to rhyme with <i>tight</i>. Never <i>hate</i> nor <i>heighth</i>.</p>
+
+<p>210. Who has my <i>scissors?</i> <i>never</i> call <i>scissors</i>,
+<i>sithers</i>.</p>
+
+<p>211. First <i>of all</i> I shall give you a lesson in French,
+and last <i>of all</i> in music; leave out <i>of all</i> in both
+instances, as unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>212. I shall have finished by the <i>latter</i> end of the
+week; leave out <i>latter</i>, which is unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>213. They sought him <i>throughout</i> the <i>whole</i> country;
+leave out <i>whole</i>, which is implied in <i>throughout</i>.</p>
+
+<p>214. Iron sinks <i>down</i> in water; leave out <i>down</i>.</p>
+
+<p>215. I own that I did not come soon enough; but
+<i>because why?</i> I was detained; leave out <i>because</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[116]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>216. Have you seen the new <i>pantomime?</i> never
+say <i>pantomine</i>, as there is no such word.</p>
+
+<p>217. I <i>cannot by no means</i> allow it; say, I <i>can by
+no means</i>, &amp;c., or, I <i>cannot by any means</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>218. He <i>covered it over;</i> leave out <i>over</i>.</p>
+
+<p>219. I bought <i>a new pair of shoes;</i> say, <i>a pair of
+new shoes</i>.</p>
+
+<p>220. He <i>combined together</i> these facts; leave out
+<i>together</i>.</p>
+
+<p>221. My brother called on me, and we <i>both</i> took a
+walk; leave out <i>both</i>, which is unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>222. The <i>duke</i> discharged his <i>duty;</i> sound the <i>u</i>
+in <i>duke</i> and <i>duty</i> like the word <i>you</i>, and carefully
+avoid saying, <i>dook</i> and <i>dooty</i>, or <i>doo</i> for <i>dew</i>.</p>
+
+<p>223. <i>Genealogy</i>, <i>geography</i>, and <i>geometry</i> are words
+of Greek derivation; beware of saying, <i>geneology</i>,
+<i>jography</i>, and <i>jometry</i>, a very common practice.</p>
+
+<p>224. He made out the <i>inventory;</i> place the accent
+in <i>inventory</i> on the syllable <i>in</i>, and <span class="smcap">never</span> on <i>ven</i>.</p>
+
+<p>225. He deserves <i>chastisement;</i> say, <i>chas-tiz-ment</i>,
+with the accent on <i>chas</i>, and <span class="smcap">never</span> on <i>tise</i>.</p>
+
+<p>226. He threw the <i>rind</i> away; never call <i>rind</i>,
+<i>rine</i>.</p>
+
+<p>227. They contributed to his <i>maintenance;</i> pronounce
+<i>maintenance</i> with the accent on <i>main</i>, and
+<i>never</i> say, <i>maintainance</i>.</p>
+
+<p>228. She wears a silk <i>gown;</i> never say, <i>gownd</i>.</p>
+
+<p>229. Sussex is a <i>maritime</i> county; pronounce the
+<i>last</i> syllable of <i>maritime</i> so as to rhyme with <i>rim</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[117]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>230. He <i>hovered</i> about the enemy; pronounce
+<i>hovered</i> so as to rhyme with <i>covered</i>.</p>
+
+<p>231. He is a powerful <i>ally;</i> <i>never</i> place the accent
+on <i>al</i> in <i>ally</i>, as many do.</p>
+
+<p>232. She bought a <i>diamond</i> necklace; pronounce
+<i>diamond</i> in <i>three</i> syllables, <span class="smcap">never</span> in <i>two</i>, which is a
+very common practice.</p>
+
+<p>233. He reads the "Weekly <i>Despatch;</i>" <span class="smcap">never</span>
+spell the word <i>despatch</i>, <i>dispatch</i>.</p>
+
+<p>234. He said <i>as how</i> you <i>was</i> to do it; say, he
+said <i>that you were to do it</i>.</p>
+
+<p>235. Never say, "<i>I acquiesce with you;</i>" but, "<i>I
+acquiesce in your proposal, in your opinion</i>," &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>236. He is a distinguished <i>antiquarian;</i> say, <i>antiquary</i>.
+<i>Antiquarian</i> is an adjective; <i>antiquary</i>, a
+noun.</p>
+
+<p>237. In Goldsmith's "History of England" we
+find the following extraordinary sentence in one of
+the chapters on the reign of Queen Elizabeth:&mdash;"This"
+[a communication to Mary, Queen of Scots]
+"they effected by conveying their letters to her by
+means of a brewer <i>that supplied the family with ale
+through a chink in the wall of her apartment</i>." A
+queer brewer that,&mdash;to supply his ale through a chink
+in the wall! How easy the alteration to make the
+passage clear! "This they effected by conveying
+their letters to her <i>through a chink in the wall of her
+apartment, by means of a brewer that supplied the
+family with ale</i>."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[118]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>238. Lavater wrote on <i>Physiognomy;</i> in the last
+word sound the <i>g</i> distinctly, as <i>g</i> is always pronounced
+before <i>n</i> when it is not in the same syllable; as, <i>indignity</i>,
+&amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>239. She is a very clever <i>girl;</i> pronounce <i>girl</i> as
+if written <i>gerl;</i> never say <i>gal</i>, which is very vulgar.</p>
+
+<p>240. He built a large <i>granary;</i> pronounce <i>granary</i>
+so as to rhyme with <i>tannery</i>, never call the word
+<i>grainary</i>.</p>
+
+<p>241. Beware of using <i>Oh!</i> and <i>O</i> indiscriminately;
+<i>Oh!</i> is used to express the emotion of <i>pain</i>, <i>sorrow</i>,
+or <i>surprise;</i> as, "Oh! the exceeding grace of God,
+who loves his creatures so." <i>O</i> is used to express
+<i>wishing</i>, <i>exclamation</i>, or a direct <i>address</i> to a person;
+as,</p>
+
+<div class='poem'>
+"O mother, will the God above,<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Forgive my faults like thee?"</span><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>242. Some writers make a distinction between <i>farther</i>
+and <i>further;</i> they are, in fact, the very same
+word. <i>Further</i>, however, is less used than <i>farther</i>,
+though it is the genuine form.</p>
+
+<p>243. He did it <i>unbeknown</i> to us; say, <i>unknown</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>244. If I say "They retreated <i>back</i>," I use a word
+that is <i>superfluous</i>, as <i>back</i> is implied in the syllable
+<i>re</i> in <i>retreated</i>. Never place the accent on <i>flu</i> in
+<i>superfluous</i>, but always on <i>per</i>.</p>
+
+<p>245. In reading Paley's "Evidences of Christianity,"<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[119]</a></span>
+I unexpectedly <i>lit on</i> the passage I wanted;
+say, <i>met with</i> the passage, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>246. He has ordered a <i>phaeton</i> from his coach-maker;
+beware of saying, <i>pheton</i> or <i>phaton</i>. The
+word should always be pronounced in <i>three</i> syllables,
+with the accent on <i>pha</i>. N. B. In pha-e-ton the <i>a</i>
+and <i>e</i> do <i>not</i> form a diphthong, as many suppose; the
+word is of Greek origin.</p>
+
+<p>247. Be careful to use the hyphen (-) correctly;
+it joins compound words, and words broken by the
+ending of the line. The use of the hyphen will appear
+more clearly from the following example:
+"<i>many colored</i> wings" means <i>many</i> wings, which
+are <i>colored;</i> but "<i>many-colored</i> wings" means "wings
+of <i>many colors</i>."</p>
+
+<p>248. He had to wait in an <i>antechamber;</i> carefully
+avoid spelling the last word <i>antichamber</i>. N. B. An
+<i>antechamber</i> is the chamber that leads to the chief
+apartment. <i>Ante</i> is a <span class="smcap">Latin preposition</span>, and means
+<i>before</i>, as, to ante<i>date</i>, that is, "to date beforehand."
+<i>Anti</i> is a <span class="smcap">Greek preposition</span>, and means <i>against</i>, as,
+anti<i>monarchical</i>, that is, "against government by a
+single person."</p>
+
+<p>249. The <i>axe</i> was very sharp; never spell <i>axe</i>
+without the <i>e</i>.</p>
+
+<p>250. The force of voice, which is placed on any
+particular word or words to distinguish the sense, is
+called <i>emphasis</i> and those words are called <i>emphatical
+words:</i> as, "Grammar is a <i>useful</i> science." In this<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[120]</a></span>
+sentence the word <i>useful</i> is emphatical. The great
+importance of <i>emphasis</i> may be seen by the following
+example:</p>
+
+<div class='poem'>
+1. Will you <i>call</i> on me to-morrow?<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">Yes, I shall [<i>call</i>].</span><br />
+<br />
+2. Will you call on <i>me</i> to-morrow?<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">No, but I shall call on your <i>brother</i>.</span><br />
+<br />
+3. Will you call on me <i>to-morrow?</i><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">No, but I shall on the <i>following day</i>.</span><br />
+<br />
+4. Will <i>you</i> call on me to-morrow?<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">No, but my <i>brother</i> will.</span><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>251. Never say <i>o-fences</i> for <i>offences;</i> <i>pison</i> for
+<i>poison;</i> <i>co-lection</i> for <i>collection;</i> <i>voiolent</i> for <i>violent;</i>
+<i>kiver</i> for <i>cover;</i> <i>afeard</i> for <i>afraid;</i> <i>debbuty</i> for <i>deputy</i>.</p>
+
+<p>252. He is a mere <i>cipher;</i> never spell <i>cipher</i> with
+a <i>y</i>.</p>
+
+<p>253. I was <i>necessitated</i> to do it; a vile expression,
+and often made worse by <i>necessiated</i> being used.
+Say, I was <i>obliged</i>, or <i>compelled</i>, to do it.</p>
+
+<p>254. Gibbon wrote the "<i>Rise</i> and Fall of the
+Roman Empire;" pronounce <i>rise</i>, the noun, so as to
+rhyme with <i>price;</i> <i>rise</i>, the verb, rhymes with <i>prize</i>.</p>
+
+<p>255. Have you been to the <i>National</i> Gallery?
+Never pronounce <i>national</i> as if it were written <i>nay-shun-al</i>,
+a very common error, and by no means confined
+to uneducated persons.</p>
+
+<p>256. I bought a new <i>umbrella;</i> beware of pronouncing
+<i>umbrella</i>, <i>umberella</i>, or <i>umbereller</i>, both very
+common errors.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[121]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>257. He is a supporter of the <i>government;</i> beware
+of omitting the <i>n</i> in the second syllable of <i>government</i>.
+A very common practice.</p>
+
+<p>258. He strenuously maintained the <i>contrary;</i> never
+place the accent on the <i>second</i> syllable in <i>contrary</i>.
+In the ancient and time-honored ditty, however, of</p>
+
+<div class='poem'>
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">"Mistress Mary,</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Quite <i>contrary</i>,</span><br />
+How does your garden grow?"<br />
+</div>
+
+<div class='unindent'>a ballad with which we are all more or less familiar,
+the word "<i>contrary</i>" <i>is</i> accented on the <i>second</i> syllable,
+so as to rhyme with the name of the venerable
+dame to whom these memorable lines were addressed.</div>
+
+<p>259. "Received this day <i>of</i> Mr. Brown, ten pounds;"
+say, "Received this day <i>from</i>", &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>260. "In what case is the word <i>dominus?</i>" "In
+the <i>nominative</i>, sir." In the hurry of school pronunciation
+"<i>nominative</i>" is nearly always heard in <i>three</i>
+syllables, as if written <i>nomnative</i> or <i>nomative</i>, an error
+that should be very carefully avoided; it is a word of
+<i>four</i> syllables.</p>
+
+<p>261. Of whatever you <i>get</i>, endeavor to save something;
+and, with all your <i>getting</i>, <i>get</i> wisdom. Carefully
+avoid saying <i>git</i> for <i>get</i>, and <i>gitting</i> for <i>getting</i>.</p>
+
+<p>262. So intent was he on the song he was <i>singing</i>,
+as he stood by the fire, that he did not perceive that
+his clothes were <i>singeing</i>. N. B. Verbs ending with
+a <i>single e</i> omit the <i>e</i> when the termination <i>ing</i> is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[122]</a></span>
+added; as, <i>give</i>, <i>giving</i>. In <i>singeing</i>, however, the <i>e</i>
+must be retained, to prevent its being confounded
+with <i>singing</i>.</p>
+
+<p>263. The boy had a <i>swingeing</i> for <i>swinging</i> without
+permission. <i>Read the preceding note.</i></p>
+
+<p>264. The man who was <i>dyeing</i> said that his father
+was then <i>dying</i>. Read the note in No. 262, in reference
+to <i>dyeing;</i> and observe that <i>die</i> changes the <i>i</i>
+into <i>y</i> before the addition of the termination <i>ing</i>.</p>
+
+<p>265. His <i>surname</i> is Clifford; never spell the <i>sur</i>
+in <i>surname</i>, <i>sir</i>, which shows an ignorance of is true
+derivation, which is from the Latin.</p>
+
+<p>266. In "Bell's Life in London," of Saturday, Jan.
+13th, of the current year [1855], there is a letter
+from a Scotchman to the editor on the subject of the
+declining salmon fisheries in Scotland. In one passage
+the writer thus expresses himself: "The Duke
+of Sutherland has got <i>almost no rent</i> for these [salmon]
+rivers for the last four years," &amp;c. The writer should
+have said, <i>scarcely any rent</i>. "<i>Almost no rent</i>" is a
+downright Scotticism.</p>
+
+<p>267. His <i>mamma</i> sent him to a preparatory school;
+<i>mamma</i> is often written with one <i>m</i> only, which is
+not, as may at first be supposed, in imitation of the
+French [<i>maman</i>], but in sheer ignorance. The word
+is pure Greek.</p>
+
+<p>268. Active verbs often take a neuter sense; as,
+<i>The house is building</i>. Here <i>is building</i> is used in a
+neuter signification, because it has no object after it.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[123]</a></span>
+By this rule are explained such sentences as, <i>Application
+is wanting</i>, <i>The grammar is printing</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>269. He <i>attackted</i> me without the slightest provocation;
+say, <i>attacked</i>.</p>
+
+<p>270. I saw him <i>somewheres</i> in the city; say, <i>somewhere</i>.
+N. B. <i>Nowheres</i>, <i>everywheres</i>, and <i>anywheres</i>
+are also very frequently heard.</p>
+
+<p>271. He is still a <i>bacheldor;</i> say, <i>bachelor</i>.</p>
+
+<p>272. His language was quite <i>blasphemous;</i> beware
+of placing the accent on <i>phe</i> in <i>blasphemous</i>. A very
+common mistake. Place the accent on the syllable
+<i>blas</i>.</p>
+
+<p>273. I fear I shall <i>discommode</i> you; say, <i>incommode</i>.</p>
+
+<p>274. I can do it <i>equally as well as</i> he; leave out
+<i>equally</i>, which is altogether superfluous.</p>
+
+<p>275. We could not forbear <i>from</i> doing it; leave
+out <i>from</i>, which is unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>276. They accused him <i>for</i> neglecting his duty;
+say, <i>of</i> neglecting, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>277. He was made much <i>on</i> at Bath; say, made
+much <i>of</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>278. He is a man <i>on</i> whom you can confide; say,
+<i>in</i> whom, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>279. <i>I'm thinking</i> he will soon arrive; say, <i>I
+think</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>280. He was obliged to <i>fly</i> the country; say, <i>flee</i>
+the country. A very common mistake.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>281. The snuffers <i>wants</i> mending; say, <i>want</i>
+mending.</p>
+
+<p>282. His conduct admits <i>of</i> no apology; leave out
+<i>of</i>, which is quite unnecessary.</p>
+
+<p>283. A <i>gent</i> has been here, inquiring for you,&mdash;a
+detestable, but very common, expression; say, a
+<i>gentleman</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>284. That was <i>all along of</i> you; say, That was <i>all
+your fault</i>.</p>
+
+<p>285. You have no <i>call</i> to be vexed with me; say,
+no <i>occasion</i>, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>286. I <i>don't</i> know nothing about it,&mdash;a very common
+cockneyism; leave out <i>don't</i>.</p>
+
+<p>287. I <i>had</i> rather not, should be, I <i>would</i> rather
+not.</p>
+
+<p>288. I <i>had better</i> go, should be, <i>It were better</i> that
+I should go.</p>
+
+<p>289. A <i>new pair</i> of gloves, should be, A <i>pair of
+new</i> gloves.</p>
+
+<p>290. He is a <i>very rising</i> man, should be, He is
+<i>rising rapidly</i>.</p>
+
+<p>291. Apartments <i>to let</i>, should be, Apartments <i>to be
+let</i>.</p>
+
+<p>292. No <i>less</i> than ten persons, should be, No <i>fewer</i>
+than ten persons. <i>Less</i> must be applied to quantity,
+as, No <i>less</i> than ten pounds. <i>Fewer</i> must be applied
+to things.</p>
+
+<p>293. I <i>never</i> speak, <i>whenever</i> I can help it, should
+be, I never speak <i>when</i> I can help it.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>294. <i>Before</i> I do that, I must <i>first</i> be paid, should
+be, Before I do that, I must be paid.</p>
+
+<p>295. To <i>get over</i> an illness, should be, To <i>survive</i>,
+or, To <i>recover from</i> an illness.</p>
+
+<p>296. To <i>get over</i> a person, should be, To <i>persuade</i>
+a person.</p>
+
+<p>297. To <i>get over</i> a fact, should be, To <i>deny</i> or
+<i>refute</i> it.</p>
+
+<p>298. The <i>then</i> Duke of Bedford, should be, The
+Duke of Bedford <i>of that day</i>, or, The <i>sixth</i> Duke of
+Bedford.</p>
+
+<p>299. The <i>then</i> Mrs. Howard, should be, The Mrs.
+Howard <i>then living</i>.</p>
+
+<p>300. A <i>couple</i> of pounds, should be, <i>Two</i> pounds.
+Couple implies union, as, A married couple.</p>
+
+<p>301. He speaks <i>slow</i>, should be, He speaks <i>slowly</i>.</p>
+
+<p>302. He is <i>noways</i> in fault, should be, He is <i>nowise</i>
+in fault.</p>
+
+<p>303. He is <i>like</i> to be, should be, He is <i>likely</i> to be.</p>
+
+<p>304. <i>All over</i> the land, should be, <i>Over all</i> the
+land.</p>
+
+<p>305. I am stout in comparison <i>to</i> you, should be, I
+am stout in comparison <i>with</i> you.</p>
+
+<p>306. At <i>best</i>, should be, At <i>the best</i>.</p>
+
+<p>307. At <i>worst</i>, should be, At <i>the worst</i>.</p>
+
+<p>308. The dinner was <i>all eat up</i>, should be, The
+dinner was <i>all eaten</i>.</p>
+
+<p>309. I <i>eat</i> heartily, should be, I <i>ate</i> heartily.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>310. As I <i>take</i> it, should be, As I <i>see</i> it, or <i>understand</i>
+it.</p>
+
+<p>311. I shall <i>fall down</i>, should be, I shall <i>fall</i>.</p>
+
+<p>312. It fell <i>on</i> the floor, should be, It fell <i>to</i> the
+floor.</p>
+
+<p>313. He <i>again repeated</i> it, should be, He <i>repeated</i>
+it.</p>
+
+<p>314. His conduct was <i>approved of</i> by all, should
+be, His conduct was <i>approved</i> by all.</p>
+
+<p>315. He was killed <i>by</i> a cannon ball, should be,
+He was killed <i>with</i> a cannon ball. The gun was
+fired <i>by</i> a man.</p>
+
+<p>316. Six weeks <i>back</i>, should be, Six weeks <i>ago</i>, or
+<i>since</i>.</p>
+
+<p>317. <i>Every now and then</i>, should be, <i>Often</i>, or
+<i>Frequently</i>.</p>
+
+<p>318. Who finds him <i>in</i> money? should be, Who
+finds him money?</p>
+
+<p>319. The <i>first of all</i>, should be, The <i>first</i>.</p>
+
+<p>320. The <i>last of all</i>, should be, The <i>last</i>.</p>
+
+<p>321. Be that as it <i>will</i>, should be, Be that as it <i>may</i>.</p>
+
+<p>322. My <i>every</i> hope, should be, <i>All</i> my hopes.</p>
+
+<p>323. Since <i>when</i>, should be, Since <i>which time</i>.</p>
+
+<p>324. He put it <i>in</i> his pocket, should be, He put it
+<i>into</i> his pocket.</p>
+
+<p>325. Since <i>then</i>, should be, Since <i>that time</i>.</p>
+
+<p>326. The <i>latter</i> end, should be, The <i>end</i>.</p>
+
+<p>327. I saw it <i>in here</i>, should be, I saw it <i>here</i>.</p>
+
+<p>328. That <i>ay'nt</i> just, should be, That <i>is not</i> just.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>329. The hen is <i>setting</i>, should be, The hen is
+<i>sitting</i>.</p>
+
+<p>330. The wind <i>sets</i>, should be, The wind <i>sits</i>.</p>
+
+<p>331. To <i>lift up</i>, should be, To <i>lift</i>.</p>
+
+<p>332. I said so <i>over again</i>, should be, I <i>repeated</i> it.</p>
+
+<p>333. From <i>here to there</i>, should be, From <i>this place
+to that</i>.</p>
+
+<p>334. <i>Nobody else</i> but him, should be, <i>Nobody</i> but
+him.</p>
+
+<p>335. The balloon <i>ascended up</i>, should be, The balloon
+<i>ascended</i>.</p>
+
+<p>336. <i>This</i> two days, should be, <i>These</i> two days.</p>
+
+<p>337. Do you <i>mean</i> to come? should be, Do you
+<i>intend</i> to come?</p>
+
+<p>338. Each of them <i>are</i>, should be, Each of them
+<i>is</i>. <i>Each</i> means one <i>and</i> the other of two.</p>
+
+<p>339. <i>Either</i> of the <i>three</i>, should be, <i>Any one</i> of the
+three. <i>Either</i> means one <i>or</i> the other of two.</p>
+
+<p>340. <i>Neither</i> one <i>or</i> the other, should be, Neither
+one <i>nor</i> the other. <i>Neither</i> (not either) means not
+the one <i>nor</i> the other of two.</p>
+
+<p>341. Better <i>nor</i> that, should be, Better <i>than</i> that.</p>
+
+<p>342. <i>Bad grammar</i>, should be, Bad or ungrammatical
+<i>English</i>.</p>
+
+<p>343. As soon as <i>ever</i>, should be, As soon as.</p>
+
+<p>344. You will <i>some</i> day be sorry, should be, You
+will <i>one</i> day be sorry.</p>
+
+<p>345. From <i>now</i>, should be, From <i>this time</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[128]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>346. Therefore, I <i>thought</i> it proper to write you,
+should be, Therefore, I <i>think</i> it proper to write <i>to</i> you.</p>
+
+<p>347. <i>There's</i> thirty, should be, There <i>are</i> thirty.</p>
+
+<p>348. <i>Subject matter</i>, should be, The subject.</p>
+
+<p>349. A <i>summer's</i> morning, should be, A <i>summer</i>
+morning.</p>
+
+<p>350. My clothes <i>have got</i> too small, or too short,
+for me, should be, I have become too stout or too tall
+for my clothes.</p>
+
+<p>351. A <i>most perfect</i> poem, should be, A <i>perfect</i>
+poem. Perfect, supreme, complete, brief, full, empty,
+true, false, do not admit of comparison.</p>
+
+<p>352. Avoid using unmeaning or vulgar phrases in
+speaking, as, You don't say so? Don't you know?
+Don't you see? You know; You see; So, you
+see, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p>353. Is Mr. Smith <i>in?</i> should be, Is Mr. Smith
+<i>within?</i></p>
+
+<p>354. The <i>other one</i>, should be, The other.</p>
+
+<p>355. <i>Another one</i>, should be, Another.</p>
+
+<p>356. I <i>left</i> this morning. Name the place left.</p>
+
+<p>357. Over head <i>and ears</i>, should be, Over <i>head</i>.</p>
+
+<p>358. I may <i>perhaps</i>, or <i>probably</i>, should be, I may.</p>
+
+<p>359. Whether he will or <i>no</i>, should be, Whether
+he will or <i>not</i>.</p>
+
+<p>360. <i>Says</i> I, should be, <i>Said</i> I, or, I <i>said</i>.</p>
+
+<p>361. He spoke <i>contemptibly</i> of him, should be, He
+spoke <i>contemptuously</i> of him.</p>
+
+<p>362. <i>Was</i> you? should be, <i>Were</i> you?<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>363. I am <i>oftener</i> well than ill, should be, I am
+<i>more frequently</i> well than ill.</p>
+
+<p>364. For <i>good and all</i>, should be, For <i>ever</i>.</p>
+
+<p>365. It is <i>above</i> a month since, should be, It is
+<i>more</i> then a month since.</p>
+
+<p>366. He is a <i>superior</i> man, should be, He is <i>superior
+to most</i> men.</p>
+
+<p>367. He <i>need</i> not do it, should be, He <i>needs</i> not do
+it.</p>
+
+<p>368. Go <i>over</i> the bridge, should be, Go <i>across</i> the
+bridge.</p>
+
+<p>369. I was some distance from home, should be, I
+was <i>at</i> some distance from home.</p>
+
+<p>370. He <i>belongs</i> to the <i>Mechanics'</i> Institution, should
+be, He is a <i>member</i> of the <i>Mechanics'</i> Institution.</p>
+
+<p>371. For <i>such another</i> book, should be, For <i>another
+such</i> book.</p>
+
+<p>372. They <i>mutually</i> loved <i>each other</i>, should be,
+They loved <i>each other</i>.</p>
+
+<p>373. I <i>ay'nt</i>, should be, I <i>am not</i>.</p>
+
+<p>374. I am <i>up to you</i>, should be, I <i>understand</i> you.</p>
+
+<p>375. Bread has <i>rose</i>, should be, Bread has <i>risen</i>.</p>
+
+<p>376. He was in <i>eminent</i> danger, should be, He was
+in <i>imminent</i> danger.</p>
+
+<p>377. Take hold <i>on</i>, should be, Take hold <i>of</i>.</p>
+
+<p>378. Vegetables were <i>plenty</i>, should be, Vegetables
+were <i>plentiful</i>.</p>
+
+<p>379. Avoid all slang and vulgar words and phrases,
+as, <i>Any how</i>, <i>Bating</i>, <i>Bran new</i>, <i>To blow up</i>, <i>Bother</i>,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</a></span>
+<i>Cut</i>, <i>Currying favor</i>, <i>Fork out</i>, <i>Half an eye</i>, <i>I am up
+to you</i>, <i>Kick up</i>, <i>Leastwise</i>, <i>Nowheres</i>, <i>Pell-mell</i>,
+<i>Scrape</i>, <i>The Scratch</i>, <i>Rum</i>, <i>Topsy-turvey</i>, <i>Walk into</i>,
+<i>Whatsomever</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"Be thou familiar, but by no means vulgar."&mdash;<span class="smcap">Shakespeare.</span></p>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1_ad" id="Page_1_ad">[1]</a></span></p>
+
+<h2>CATALOGUE<br />
+
+<span class='small'>OF</span><br />
+
+Books for Schools and Colleges,<br />
+
+<span class='small'>PUBLISHED BY</span><br />
+
+JAMES MUNROE &amp; CO.<br />
+
+<span class='small'>No. 134 Washington Street, Boston,</span><br />
+
+<span class='small'>AND</span><br />
+
+<span class='small'>Lyceum Building, Harvard Square, Cambridge.</span></h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>FIRST LESSONS IN GRAMMAR.</b></div>
+
+<p>LITTLE EDWARD'S FIRST LESSONS IN GRAMMAR.
+By Mrs. Lowell. 18mo. 17 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>ENGLISH GRAMMAR.</b></div>
+
+<p>ENGLISH GRAMMAR, on the basis of Lindley Murray.
+By John Goldsbury. 12mo. 20 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>SEQUEL TO ENGLISH GRAMMAR.</b></div>
+
+<p>SEQUEL TO ENGLISH GRAMMAR, being the second
+part. By John Goldsbury. 12mo. 20 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+
+<div class='center'><b>DEVOTIONAL EXERCISES.</b></div>
+
+<p>DEVOTIONAL EXERCISES FOR SCHOOLS AND
+FAMILIES, with a Selection of Hymns. 16mo. 37 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>MORAL PHILOSOPHY.</b></div>
+
+<p>A SYSTEM OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY. Adapted to
+Children and Families, and especially to Common Schools.
+By Rev. D. Steele and a Friend. 18mo. pp. 80. 15 cts.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2_ad" id="Page_2_ad">[2]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.</b></div>
+
+<p>MASON ON THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
+This work is highly recommended by the late Judge Story.
+12mo. 84 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>RUSSELL'S ELOCUTIONARY READER.</b></div>
+
+<p>THE ELOCUTIONARY READER; containing a Selection
+of Reading Lessons. By Anna U. Russell. With
+Introductory Rules and Exercises in Elocution. By W.
+Russell, Author of the University Speaker. 12mo. pp. 480.
+83 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b><ins title="Transcriber's Note: original reads 'RUSSELS''">RUSSELL'S</ins> INTRODUCTION TO THE READER.</b></div>
+
+<p>INTRODUCTION TO THE ELOCUTIONARY READER:
+containing a Selection of Reading Lessons; together
+with the Rudiments of Elocution. By William and Anna
+U. Russell. New Edition. 12mo. pp. 252. 63 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>RUSSELL'S UNIVERSITY SPEAKER.</b></div>
+
+<p>THE UNIVERSITY SPEAKER: a Collection of Pieces
+designed for College Exercises in Declamation and Recitation,
+with Suggestions on the Appropriate Elocution of
+Particular Passages. By William Russell, Author of the
+Elocutionary Reader, &amp;c. 12mo. New Edition. pp. 528.
+$1.25.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>PICTORIAL NATURAL HISTORY.</b></div>
+
+<p>A PICTORIAL HISTORY: embracing a View of the
+Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms. For the Use
+of Schools. By S. G. Goodrich. Author of Peter Parley's
+Tales. New Edition. 12mo. Four Hundred Cuts. $1.00.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>JOUFFROY'S INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS.</b></div>
+
+<p>INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS, including a Critical
+Survey of Moral Systems. Translated from the French of
+Jouffroy. By William H. Channing. Two vols. 12mo.
+pp. 362 each. Sixth Edition. $2.00.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3_ad" id="Page_3_ad">[3]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>STEWART'S PHILOSOPHY.</b></div>
+
+<p>STEWART'S PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN
+MIND. Revised and abridged, with Critical and Explanatory
+Notes, for the Use of Colleges and Schools. By
+Francis Bowen, Alford Professor of Moral and Intellectual
+Philosophy in Harvard College. Second Edition. 12mo.
+pp. 502. $1.25.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>MATHEMATICAL ARITHMETIC.</b></div>
+
+<p>MATHEMATICAL ARITHMETIC, By Rev. Thomas
+Hill. 12mo. 37 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>GEOMETRY AND SCIENCE OF FORM.</b></div>
+
+<p>AN INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRY AND THE
+SCIENCE OF FORM. Prepared from the most approved
+Prussian Text-Books. 12mo. pp. 180. 160 Figures, 83
+cents.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"I have carefully examined the manuscript of 'An Introduction to
+Geometry,' and think it admirably adapted to supply an important
+want in education. It is not a mere geometrical logic, but a natural
+and simple introduction to the Science of Form."</p>
+
+<div class='sig'>
+<span style="margin-right: 4em;">BENJAMIN PEIRCE,</span><br />
+
+<i>Perkins Professor of Astronomy and Mathematics
+in Harvard University.</i><br />
+</div></div>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>GEOMETRICAL BLOCKS.</b></div>
+
+<p>GEOMETRICAL BLOCKS, designed to accompany The
+Introduction to Geometry. In case. $2.00.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>PEIRCE'S ALGEBRA.</b></div>
+
+<p>An ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON ALGEBRA,
+To which are added Exponential Equations and Logarithms.
+By Benjamin Peirce, A. M., Perkins Professor of Astronomy
+and Mathematics in Harvard University. 12mo. Seventh
+Edition. 83 cents.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4_ad" id="Page_4_ad">[4]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>PEIRCE'S GEOMETRY.</b></div>
+
+<p>AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON PLANE AND
+SOLID GEOMETRY. New Edition. 12mo. 184 Figures.
+83 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>PEIRCE'S TRIGONOMETRY.</b></div>
+
+<p>AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON PLANE AND
+SPHERICAL TRIGONOMETRY, with their Applications
+to Navigation, Surveying, Heights, and Distances, and
+Spherical Astronomy, and particularly adapted to explaining
+the Construction of Bowditch's Navigator, and the
+Nautical Almanac. New Edition, revised, with Additions.
+8vo. Plates. $1.75.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>PEIRCE'S CURVES AND FUNCTIONS.</b></div>
+
+<p>AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON CURVES,
+FUNCTIONS, AND FORCES. Volume First, containing
+Analytic Geometry and the Differential Calculus. Volume
+Second, containing Calculus of Imaginary Quantities, Residual
+Calculus, and Integral Calculus. Second Edition. 2
+vols. 12mo. Plates. $2.50.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>WHATELY'S ENGLISH SYNONYMS.</b></div>
+
+<p>A SELECTION OF ENGLISH SYNONYMS. First
+American, from the Second London Edition. Revised and
+enlarged. 12mo. pp. 180. 63 cents.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"For a clear and full understanding of the force and meaning of
+these, the reader will find here great assistance."&mdash;<i>Merchants'
+Magazine.</i></p>
+
+<p>"It will be welcome to the lovers of nice philological distinctions.
+As a whole, they are marked by good sense, as well as by critical
+acumen; and rich as they are in suggestions, even to the most accomplished
+word-fancier, they cannot be studied without advantage."&mdash;<i>Harper's
+Magazine.</i></p>
+
+<p>"It is marked by that strong common-sense and accurate learning
+which have rendered the author's educational treatises so indispensable
+to all professional teachers. We know of no work on synonyms
+that is equal in value to this."&mdash;<i>New York Recorder.</i></p></div><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5_ad" id="Page_5_ad">[5]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>WHATELY'S ELEMENTS OF LOGIC.</b></div>
+
+<p>ELEMENTS OF LOGIC, comprising the Substance of
+the Article in the Encyclop&aelig;dia Metropolitana, with Additions,
+&amp;c. By Richard Whately, D. D., Archbishop of
+Dublin. New revised Edition, with the Author's last Additions.
+Large 12mo. pp. 484. Cloth stamped. $1.00.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"This work (Elements of Logic) has long been our text-book here.
+The style in which you have published this new edition of so valuable
+a work leaves nothing to be desired in regard of elegance and
+convenience."&mdash;<span class="smcap">Professor Dunn</span>, <i>Brown University.</i></p>
+
+<p>"Its merits are now too widely known to require an enumeration
+of them. The present American edition of it is conformed to the
+ninth English edition, which was revised by the author, and which
+contains several improvements on the former issues."&mdash;<i>North American
+Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>"This elementary treatise holds a very high rank among the educational
+works of the day, having been introduced into most of the
+best managed and popular seminaries of learning, both in England
+and the United States. It is got up in correct and beautiful style."&mdash;<i>Merchants'
+Magazine.</i></p>
+
+<p>"From stereotype plates, and the new ninth edition revised by its
+author, have just been published, in a fairer and handsomer style,
+than the English copy, Archbishop Whately's Elements of Logic,
+which, like the 'Rhetoric' by the same prelate, has taken its place
+as a standard work, and is too generally known and used to need
+special notice."&mdash;<i>Christian Inquirer.</i></p></div>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>WHATELY'S ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC.</b></div>
+
+<p>ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC: comprising an Analysis
+of the Laws of Moral Evidence and of Persuasion, with
+Rules for Argumentative Composition and Elocution. New
+Edition, revised by the Author. Large 12mo. pp. 546.
+$1.00.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"The Elements of Rhetoric has become so much a standard work
+that it might seem superfluous to speak of it. In short, we should
+not dream of teaching a college class from any other book on Rhetoric.
+Communion with Whately's mind would improve any mind
+on earth."&mdash;<i>Presbyterian Quarterly Review.</i></p></div><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6_ad" id="Page_6_ad">[6]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>QUESTIONS TO WHATELY'S RHETORIC.</b></div>
+
+<p>QUESTIONS ADAPTED TO WHATELY'S ELEMENTS
+OF RHETORIC, for the Use of Schools and
+Colleges; prepared by a Teacher. 12mo. 15 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>QUESTIONS TO WHATELY'S LOGIC.</b></div>
+
+<p>QUESTIONS ADAPTED TO WHATELY'S ELEMENTS
+OF LOGIC, for the Use of Schools and Colleges;
+prepared by a Teacher. 12mo. 15 cents.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>WHATELY'S LESSONS ON REASONING.</b></div>
+
+<p>EASY LESSONS ON REASONING. By Richard
+Whately, D. D. Fourth Edition, from the Fifth London
+Edition. 12mo. pp. 180. 63 cents.</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"It is an admirably clear and simple introduction to Dr. Whately's
+'Elements of Logic,' being designed, apparently, to facilitate the use
+of that work in academies and high schools."&mdash;<i>North American
+Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>"It is marked on every page by that same strong good-sense and
+solid learning, which have rendered his works on Logic and Rhetoric
+to universally valuable as text-books for students."&mdash;<i>Boston Daily
+Advertiser.</i></p>
+
+<p>"The work before us is an attempt to simplify the study of logic,
+and to set young persons at the good task of thinking,&mdash;thinking
+correctly, and speaking correctly. The attempt is admirable, and
+the volume deserves general patronage."&mdash;<i>United States Gazette.</i></p></div>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class='center'><b>BOWEN'S VIRGIL.</b></div>
+
+<p>P. VIRGILII MARONIS BUCOLICA, GEORGICA,
+ET &AElig;NEIS. Virgil; with English Notes, prepared for
+the Use of Classical Schools and Colleges. By Francis
+Bowen, Alford Professor of Moral and Intellectual Philosophy
+in Harvard College. Stereotype Edition. 8vo. pp.
+600. $2.25.</p>
+
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><a name="Footnote_A_1" id="Footnote_A_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_A_1"><span class="label">[A]</span></a>
+<div class='poem3'>
+"Quale i fioretti, dol notturno gielo<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">Chinati e chiusi, poi che 'l sol gl' imbianca,</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Si drizzan tutti aperti in loro stelo,</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1.5em;">Tal mi fece io di mia virtute stanca."</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 16em;"><i>Inf.</i> Can. ii. 127-9.</span><br />
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><a name="Footnote_B_2" id="Footnote_B_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_B_2"><span class="label">[B]</span></a>
+<div class='poem3'>
+"Omne vafer vitium ridenti Flaccus amico<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Tangit, et admissus circum pr&aelig;cordia ludit."</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 19em;">Pers. i. 116.</span><br />
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_C_3" id="Footnote_C_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_C_3"><span class="label">[C]</span></a> December, 1854.</p></div>
+</div>
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<div class='tnote'><h3>Transcriber's Notes:</h3>
+<p>Obvious punctuation errors repaired.</p>
+
+<p>The remaining corrections made are indicated by dotted lines under the corrections. Scroll the mouse over the word and the original text will <ins title="Transcriber's Note: original reads 'apprear'">appear</ins>.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Conversation, by Andrew P. Peabody
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CONVERSATION ***
+
+***** This file should be named 34863-h.htm or 34863-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/8/6/34863/
+
+Produced by Emmy, Darleen Dove and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/34863-h/images/bracket1.png b/34863-h/images/bracket1.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f41375
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34863-h/images/bracket1.png
Binary files differ