summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/34859-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '34859-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--34859-0.txt1374
1 files changed, 1374 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/34859-0.txt b/34859-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..481f780
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34859-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1374 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Origin of Finger-Printing, by William J. Herschel
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Origin of Finger-Printing
+
+Author: William J. Herschel
+
+Release Date: January 5, 2011 [EBook #34859]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ORIGIN OF FINGER-PRINTING ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Eric Hutton and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ THE ORIGIN OF
+ FINGER-PRINTING
+
+ BY
+
+ SIR WILLIAM J. HERSCHEL, BART.
+
+
+ HUMPHREY MILFORD
+ OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
+ LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW
+ NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE BOMBAY
+ 1916
+
+
+
+ PRINTED IN ENGLAND
+ AT THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
+
+
+
+
+DEDICATION
+
+
+ _TO SIR EDWARD HENRY, G.C.V.O., K.C.B., C.S.I._
+
+ _Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police._
+
+
+ _I am offering you this old story of the beginnings of
+ Finger-printing, by way of expressing my warm and continuous
+ admiration of those masterly developments of its original
+ applications, whereby, first in Bengal and the Transvaal, and
+ then in England, you have fashioned a weapon of penetrating
+ certainty for the sterner needs of Justice._
+
+ _W. J. HERSCHEL._
+ _June, 1916._
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+The following pages have two objects: first, to place on record the
+genesis of the Finger-print method of personal identification, from its
+discovery in Bengal in 1858, till its public demonstration there in
+1877-8; secondly, to examine the scanty suggestions of evidence that
+this use of our fingers had been foreshadowed in Europe more than a
+hundred years ago, and had indeed been general in ancient times,
+especially in China.
+
+In later years, and in energetic hands, the method has been developed
+into a system far more effective than anything I contemplated, and I do
+not go into that part of the story; but I believe these pages will
+suffice to show the originality of my study of its two essential
+features, the strict individuality and the stubborn persistence of the
+patterns on our fingers.
+
+The gift granted to me of lighting upon a discovery which promised
+escape from one great difficulty of administration in India is more than
+ever appreciated by me since I have lived to see the promise wonderfully
+fulfilled there, and in other lands as well.
+
+For the sake of interest I give, among the illustrations, several
+examples of late 'repeats' taken many years after I left India; but
+these do not belong to my story.
+
+
+
+
+LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
+
+
+ PAGE
+ Bengalee contract with Rājyadhar Kōnāi, 1858.
+ (_Collotype_) _Between pages_ 8 _and_ 9
+
+ Finger-print of Dr. R. F. Hutchinson, Medical Officer at Arrah
+ Station, June 1859 10
+
+ Finger-print of Captain H. Raban, Chief of the Police in Lower
+ Bengal, July 29,1860 12
+
+ Finger-print of the Mahārājā of Nuddea, April 13, 1862 13
+
+ Finger-print of Sir Charles Howard, Superintendent of Police,
+ Nuddea, April 13, 1862; and repeat, 1908 13
+
+ Finger-print of Sir Alfred C. Lyall, 1877; and repeat, 1908 17
+
+ Finger-print of Captain A. Coleman, P. & O. SS. 'Mongolia',
+ February 1877 17
+
+ Finger-prints of Bechā Rām Dās Adhikāri,
+ (_a_) made in 1877, (_b_) made in 1892 21
+
+ Finger-print of W. F. Courthope, 1877; and repeat, 1913 27
+
+ Finger-print of Captain V. H. Haggard, R.N., 1877, aet.
+ 2¾ years; and repeat, 1913. (_Collotype_) _Facing_ 27
+
+ Finger-print of Colonel J. Herschel, R.E., September 22, 1877 28
+
+ Finger-print of Dr. J. F. Duthie, September 22, 1877 28
+
+ Finger-print of Sir Theodore Hope, Bo.C.S., 1877 29
+
+ Finger-prints of William Waterfield, B.C.S., (_a_) July 31, 1860,
+ (_b_) March 31, 1877 29
+
+ Finger-prints of W. J. Herschel, (_a_) June 1859, (_b_) July 1859,
+ (_c_) March 31, 1877, (_d_) February 22, 1916 30
+
+ Finger-prints, enlarged, of A. E. H. Herschel: 1881, aet. 7¾;
+ 1890, aet. 17; 1913, aet. 40 31
+
+ 'Thomas Bewick his mark' 33
+
+ A 'tep-sai' of Bengal compared with a finger-print 35
+
+ Caste-marks of illiterates, 1865 36
+
+ Finger-mark on a Chinese Bank-note. (_Collotype_) _Facing_ 38
+
+
+
+
+THE ORIGIN OF FINGER-PRINTING
+
+
+In 1858, after five years' service, as an Assistant under the old East
+India Company, in the interior of Bengal, I was in charge of my first
+subdivision, the head-quarters of which were then at Jungipoor, on the
+upper reaches of the Hooghly river. My executive and magisterial
+experience had by that time forced on me that distrust of all evidence
+tendered in Court which did so much to cloud our faith in the people
+around us. We cannot be too thankful that things have greatly improved
+in India in the last sixty years, but the time of which I am speaking
+was the very worst time of my life in this respect. I remember only too
+well writing in great despondency to one of the best and soberest-minded
+of my senior companions at Haileybury[1] about my despair of any good
+coming from orders and decisions based on such slippery facts, and the
+comfort I found in his sensible reply.
+
+ [1] Till 1857 the East India Company's College.
+
+It happened, in July of that year, that I was starting the first bit of
+road metalling at Jungipoor, and invited tenders for a supply of
+'ghooting' (a good binding material for light roads). A native named
+Rājyadhar Kōnāi, of the village of Nistā, came to terms with me, and at
+my desire drew up our agreement in his own hand, in true commercial
+style. He was about to sign it in the usual way, at the upper right-hand
+corner, when I stopped him in order to read it myself; and it then
+occurred to me to try an experiment by taking the stamp of his hand, by
+way of signature instead of writing. There was nothing very original
+about that, as an idea. Many must have heard of some such use of a man's
+hand; and the correspondence that has taken place has brought to light
+old instances of the hand, or the nail of a finger, or the teeth in
+one's mouth, being used to certify a man's act, or a woman's. But these
+have all been isolated instances. Sir Francis Galton, however, has
+pointed out[2] that in our own times the engraver Bewick had a fancy for
+engraving his thumb-mark, with his name attached, as vignettes, or as
+colophons, in books which he published.[3] As a boy I had loved Bewick
+on Birds: I regret that it is not now to be found in our library.
+Galton's remark has reminded me that I used to see the thumb-mark there,
+as well as I recollect, in an ornamental title-page. I mention this
+because I dare say it had something to do with my fascination over
+Kōnāi's hand-markings. If so, the influence was unknown to me. The
+absorbing interests of manhood had blotted out, not Bewick, but his
+thumb-mark, from my memory. However that may be, I was only wishing to
+frighten Kōnāi out of all thought of repudiating his signature
+hereafter. He, of course, had never dreamt of such an attestation, but
+fell in readily enough. I dabbed his palm and fingers over with the
+home-made oil-ink used for my official seal, and pressed the whole
+hand on the back of the contract, and we studied it together, with a
+good deal of chaff about palmistry, comparing his palm with mine on
+another impression. Here is a facsimile of the whole document, made by
+the Clarendon Press. I was so pleased with the experiment that, having
+to make a second contract with Kōnāi, I made him attest it in the same
+way. One of these contracts I gave to Sir Francis (then Mr.) Galton for
+his celebrated paper read before the Royal Society, November 1890, to
+which body he presented it; the other lies before me now. Trials with my
+own fingers soon showed the advantage of using them instead of the whole
+hand for the purpose then in view, i.e. for securing a signature which
+the writer would obviously hesitate to disown. That he might be
+infallibly convicted of perjury, if he did, is a very different matter.
+That was not settled, and could not have been settled, to the
+satisfaction of Courts of Justice, till, after many years, abundant
+agreement had been reached among ordinary people. The very possibility
+of such a 'sanction' (to use a technical expression) to the use of a
+finger-print did not dawn upon me till after long experience, and even
+then it became no more than a personal conviction for many years more.
+The decisiveness of a finger-print is now one of the most powerful aids
+to Justice. Our possession of it derives from the impression of Kōnāi's
+hand in 1858.
+
+ [2] 'Finger-prints' (Macmillan, 1892), p. 26.
+
+ [3] See Appendix.
+
+Of trials with my own fingers the oldest impression I possess was taken
+in June 1859, when I first began to keep records. I had been transferred
+to be Magistrate of Arrah, the most north-westerly district of Bengal,
+where the Mutiny still left work to do which allowed little time for
+private hobbies; but I took so many prints among the society of the
+Station, as well as among Indians of all classes, that my 'fad' about
+them was well known. The Medical Officer of Arrah was Dr. R. F.
+Hutchinson, who naturally took great interest in the subject. Twenty-one
+years later, in 1880, he was still there, and sent me a 'repeat' print
+of his fingers. Here is a facsimile of his first Arrah impression. In
+1890, being in England, he visited Galton's Laboratory, and gave a
+second repeat (after thirty-one years) which was used in 'Finger-prints'
+(1892), p. 93, to support Mr. Galton's evidence of 'Persistency'. In the
+facsimile 'Collection 1858-1913', which I am attaching to some of the
+copies of this narrative, will be found other prints which I took at
+Arrah of my whole hand and of my right foot. They agree irresistibly
+with prints taken now after an interval of fifty-seven years.
+
+ [Illustration: KONAI'S HAND Bengal 1858]
+
+ [Illustration: Contract for 2,000 maunds of road-metalling,
+ between W. J. Herschel and Rajyadhar Konai, in Konai's
+ handwriting]
+
+In 1860 I was sent as Magistrate to Nuddea, nearer to Calcutta. The
+Indigo disturbances in the district had given rise to a great deal of
+violence, litigation, and fraud; forgery and perjury were rampant. The
+rent-rolls of the ryots put into Court by the Zemindars; the pottahs
+(agreements for rent) purporting to be issued by them to each ryot, put
+in by the latter; the kabooliyats (acceptances) purporting to be signed
+by the ryot, and tendered in evidence against him; all these documents
+were frequently worth no more than the paper on which they were written.
+In my own jail a notorious convict was found making clay seals of
+well-known landlords, and forging their signatures on pottahs smuggled
+into his hands. He was detected by the colour of the floor of his cell,
+where he kept his stock-in-trade buried. Things were so bad in this and
+other ways that the administration of Civil Justice had unusual
+difficulty in preserving its dignity. I was driven to take up
+finger-prints now with a definite object before me, and for three years
+continued taking a very large number from all sorts and conditions of
+men. I give here some selected impressions of friends taken in Nuddea
+during the years 1860, 1861, and 1862, in order of date, and names of
+some others.
+
+ [Illustration: R. F. Hutchinson, June 1859, Medical Officer at
+ Arrah Station.]
+
+1860, July. Claude Brown, a prominent merchant of Calcutta, who was
+making a tour in the Indigo districts, and was at the time my guest.
+
+1860, July 29. Captain H. Raban, Head of the Bengal Police, sent to
+Nuddea on account of its disturbed state; also my guest. He took extreme
+interest in the evidence of his own imprint. It was my habit, of course,
+to give duplicates of his 'mark' to every one of importance.
+
+ [Illustration: Captain H. Raban, Head of the Police in Lower
+ Bengal, July 29, 1860.]
+
+1860, July 31. W. Waterfield, B.C.S., a college friend, afterwards
+Comptroller-General of the Treasuries of India. I have several 'repeats'
+of his; see especially p. 29.
+
+1861, June 24. Ogilvie Temple, Judge of the Court of Small Causes,
+Kooshtea.
+
+1862, April 13. At a gathering at my house at Kishnagar I had the good
+fortune to secure the prints of many other notables of the district.
+
+The Mahārājā of Nuddea. He was the highest of the old nobility of
+Bengal. He was much struck, as I was, by the remarkable symmetry of the
+'pattern' on one of his fingers at the core.
+
+ [Illustration:
+ April 13, 1862. Mahārājā of Nuddea.
+ Enlarged for the remarkable pattern]
+
+ [Illustration:
+ April 13, 1862. A. C. Howard.
+ July 20, 1908. Sir Charles Howard.]
+
+Same day. E. Grey, B.C.S. A college friend, on my staff, afterwards
+Civil and Sessions Judge. He, I am happy to say, is still alive (1916),
+and his 'repeat' is quite good now.
+
+Same day. A. C. Howard, District Superintendent of Police, Nuddea,
+afterwards Assistant Commissioner at Scotland Yard, and knighted for his
+services there, as Sir Charles Howard. He gladly gave me a 'repeat' in
+London after forty-six years. It will be seen how good the persistence
+has been.
+
+Same day. Three other Assistant Magistrates on the unusually large staff
+of the district. Among these was F. K. Hewitt, B.C.S., afterwards
+Commissioner of Chota Nagpur. Twenty-six years later, at my request, he
+furnished Sir Francis Galton with the 'repeat' printed on p. 93 of his
+famous work 'Finger-prints' (Macmillan, 1892). I have much later repeats
+taken at Oxford.
+
+Same day. Ninian H. Thomson, Judge of the Court of Small Causes. He
+kindly sent me a repeat twenty-eight years later from Florence, and this
+also appears in the same work, p. 93.
+
+Very early in my experiments I entertained misgivings about the
+possibility of the impressions being forged by the professional
+criminals whom we had so much reason to fear. I therefore submitted some
+specimens to the best artists in Calcutta to imitate. Their failure
+sufficed to dispel all anxiety on that point. None of them come near
+Bewick's engravings in accuracy.
+
+Before I left Kishnagar (Nuddea) the violence of the Indigo disturbances
+had been subdued, but the Courts became choked with suits for
+enhancement of rent upon the recalcitrant cultivators, and the sore
+point about the genuineness of leases, &c., became aggravated. I took
+courage from despair, and in my judicial capacity (if I remember right)
+addressed an official letter to the Government of Bengal, definitely
+advocating administrative action to enforce the use of 'finger-prints'
+by both parties as necessary to the validity of these documents.
+Unfortunately I kept no private draft of this letter, and have lost the
+date, probably 1862 or 1863. It must, however, be on record, both in
+Nuddea and in the Calcutta Secretariat. Nothing came of it, and I took
+no more pains about it. But a few years ago I was pleasantly reminded by
+Mr. Horace Cockerell, for some time Secretary to the Government, who
+gave me the history of its reception, viz. that it had been deemed
+inadvisable, when things were quieting down, to raise a new controversy
+of the sort. He added that it was a matter of regret now, that no action
+whatever had been taken, but he pointed out that legislation would have
+been necessary to make the new marks admissible in evidence, and to get
+such a law on the spur of the moment would have been hopeless. That
+difficulty had certainly never occurred to me when I made the
+suggestion. But how weighty an objection it was is shown by the fact
+that it was long, even after the value of finger-prints had been
+established in practice, before the High Court of Calcutta, in a leading
+case, declared that the evidence could not be excluded, nay more, that
+it was cogent. This was many years before such a case in England. At the
+time I wrote it is quite certain that no Court in India, no pleader, no
+solicitor had ever recognized such signatures as these.
+
+In 1863 I took my first furlough to England, which changed the current
+of my thoughts. But I found that my own people had been more interested
+than I had supposed by my correspondence on the subject. Among my
+brother Alexander's papers was found after his death a letter telling
+him my ideas, and asking him to devise a roller of some sort, for
+oil-ink, better than my soft office pads.
+
+During that and later furloughs I took no public steps about the
+subject. In society, of course, it was looked on simply as a hobby,
+attracting no more serious attention than did Bewick's fancy for
+engraving his thumb-mark in his day. But the warm interest shown by my
+own people, who had known my early troubles in India, determined me,
+during my last furlough, that before completing my service I would give
+the thing an open official trial on my own responsibility. I sailed,
+1877, in the P. and O. steamer 'Mongolia', Captain Coleman, with my
+sister, now Mrs. Maclear, who was an enthusiast on my side. We roused
+attention enough on board in the Indian Ocean to obtain the
+finger-prints of the Captain and many of his officers, stewards, and
+kalāshis; also of many of the passengers, among whom I may especially
+mention Sir Alfred and Lady Lyall (as they afterwards became), Colonel
+Garrow Waterfield, and Colonel Chermside. Some thirty years later, 1908,
+Sir A. Lyall permitted me to take and use his repeat impression. Here
+are facsimiles of both, and also of Captain Coleman's, the pattern of
+which was thought then to deserve enlargement. Friendship, which for
+family reasons sprang up between Colonel Garrow Waterfield and myself,
+led him to take special interest in my project, and I cannot doubt that
+he carried that with him to the Punjab, where his reputation was high.
+Most of the other saloon passengers were business men on their way back
+to the Far East, and left us at Ceylon. If any one of them had heard of
+the use of these marks, say in China, I could not but have been told of
+it. But there was not a breath of the sort. I give here a list of the
+remaining signatures still in my possession, in case any may meet with
+recognition: F. Slight, Officer of the 'Mongolia', F. A. Owen, J.
+Watson, R. Hawkins, F. Wingrove, O. Westphal, J. W. Malet, G. S. Lynch,
+Mrs. Philip. It is only reasonable, I think, to believe that such a
+novel and evidently useful idea would have spread by their means
+wherever they went. My exhibition was frequently asked for, and I always
+gave a duplicate of his mark to each person, and sometimes added one of
+my own to show the extraordinary persistence of patterns after nigh
+twenty years.
+
+ [Illustration:
+ Sir A. C. Lyall. 1877.
+ Sir Alfred C. Lyall, May 15, 1908.]
+
+ [Illustration:
+ Capt. A. Coleman (P. & O. SS. 'Mongolia'), February, 1877.
+ Enlargements by eye.]
+
+On my return to India, my position as Magistrate and Collector at
+Hooghly, near Calcutta, gave me the control, not only of criminal
+courts, but of the jail, and of the modern Department for Registration
+of Deeds of all sorts, and among minor duties the payment of Government
+pensions. Registration, of course, appealed most strongly to my desires,
+but the Sub-Registrar and his clerks had to be trained, and meanwhile
+the few pensioners enabled me to break the ice myself. I was not a
+little anxious lest, officially introduced, Hindus might take alarm for
+their caste. The memory of the greased cartridges of the Mutiny, so near
+Hooghly, was indelible. In private experiments I had never met any such
+difficulty, but the old lesson had been a severe one, and I thought it
+well, when acting officially, to take every precaution. I was careful,
+therefore, from the first ostentatiously to employ Hindus to take the
+impressions wanted; using, as if a matter of course, the pad and the ink
+made by one of themselves from the very seed-oil and lamp-black which
+were in constant use for the office seals in the several departments.
+
+The glad approval of the pensioners was a great pleasure to me, and made
+the other registration work astonishingly easy. The clerks took to it
+unhesitatingly, and enjoyed the fun of explaining the 'Sahib's hikmat'.
+No one ever hesitated to do as he was told, or to take away duplicates
+for talk at home. The process of registration at that time was regulated
+by a late law devised to afford the best security then possible for the
+genuineness of deeds, as far as attestation went. The signatures,
+whether in full or by caste mark, or by cross, or, in the case of women
+mostly, by touching the paper with the tip of the finger wetted with ink
+from the clerk's pen (see p. 35), were always made in the presence and
+under the eye of the Registrar, who, in most cases, had to rely on the
+sworn evidence of witnesses attesting their personal knowledge of the
+executant. The Registrar was, of course, responsible for using his
+intelligence in each case to prevent imposture. His part of the work was
+never impeached, that I know, in Bengal; nevertheless, fraudulent
+attempts did still come to light. Signatures were still denied;
+personations in presenting false deeds did take place, either to
+swindle, or, in one case, to fabricate an alibi. As long as I was at
+Hooghly I was quite satisfied that no will or other deed registered
+there with the new safeguard would ever be repudiated by the actual
+executant. I have had to think otherwise since then, because many years
+afterwards a man (in another district) who had given his finger-print
+before a Registrar repudiated it. He was summoned to give his evidence
+on oath. It was found that he had cut off the joints of his fingers,
+hoping to defeat justice by corrupting the witnesses so as to prove that
+he was _not_ the man they had recognized before the Registrar. The High
+Court rejected the sworn story of an accident, and confirmed the facts
+of the registration, with the necessary consequence to the offender for
+his perjury. I do not know of any other repudiation having been pressed
+to this bitter end in India or elsewhere. The contrast between the
+inherent weakness of the old law and the efficiency of the new test
+could not be better exemplified. This case gave the first stern blow to
+the foul mischief that had developed such cruel proportions in India
+under cover of our conservative legal habits.
+
+The way the new safeguard was applied at Hooghly in 1877 was
+thus:--After the legal formalities of registration had been observed,
+the Registrar made the person print his two fingers on the deed, and
+again in a diary book which was kept by him in the office, for my own
+inspection rather than as evidence. It is, no doubt, preserved at
+Hooghly still.
+
+It was from this book that cuttings were made at my request in 1892 by
+Mr. Duke, the magistrate, which formed the subject of Sir Francis
+Galton's volume on 'Blurred Finger-prints' (1893), to which, for its
+cogency in marshalling the evidence, I must refer my readers. I annex a
+tracing of one of his enlargements, by permission of the London
+University, to which he left his great collection.
+
+ [Illustration: Bechā Rām Dās Adhikāri. From tracings
+ by Mr. Galton of enlargements,
+ (_a_) Made in 1877 when registering his deed;
+ (_b_) made in 1892 for Mr. Galton.]
+
+Another form in which I made use of the new system for public purposes
+was in the jail. The common device of hiring a substitute to serve out a
+term was not unknown, but it involved a long risk of detection. A safer
+but very costly, and therefore rare, device was sham death and a
+purchased corpse, affording comparative safety after escape. A case of
+this kind, carried out with the aid of an irregularly appointed doctor,
+was strongly suspected by me at Hooghly.[4] The precaution I adopted
+was to take the finger-prints of each offender when passing sentence of
+imprisonment, both on the records of the Court and also on the warrant
+to the jailer.
+
+ [4] I had him dismissed soon after for a different offence.
+
+All these processes were in full use when I left India, on the
+completion of twenty-five years' service, in 1878. I was by that time
+almost broken down in health, and more so in energy. Sir Ashley Eden,
+the Lieutenant-Governor, offered me a substantive Commissionership. I
+had already held such an appointment twice, and nothing but an honest
+sense of inability made me decline it now. I mention this in explanation
+of the slackness on my part, but for which the finger-print system would
+certainly have been put in force in the Registration Department, at
+least throughout Bengal, forty years ago. As it was, I only tried to
+induce the Inspector of Jails and the Registrar-General of the day to
+give the system a trial. Fortunately I kept an office copy of this
+letter, which, in reply to outside criticism, I published in 'Nature',
+Nov. 22, 1894, and repeat here to complete this narrative.
+
+
+(TRUE COPY OF OFFICE COPY.)
+
+ HOOGHLY, _August 15, 1877_.
+
+ MY DEAR B----, --I enclose a paper which looks unusual,
+ but which I hope has some value. It exhibits a method of
+ identification of persons, which, with ordinary care in
+ execution, and with judicial care in the scrutiny, is, I can
+ now say, for all practical purposes far more infallible than
+ photography. It consists in taking a seal-like impression,
+ in common seal ink, of the markings on the skin of the two
+ forefingers of the right hand (these two being taken for
+ convenience only).
+
+ I am able to say that these marks do not (bar accidents) change
+ in the course of ten or fifteen years so much as to affect the
+ utility of the test.
+
+ The process of taking the impression is hardly more difficult
+ than that of making a fair stamp of an office seal. I have been
+ trying it in the Jail and in the Registering Office and among
+ pensioners here for some months past. I have purposely taken no
+ particular pains in explaining the process, beyond once showing
+ how it is done, and once or twice visiting the office,
+ inspecting the signatures,[5] and asking the _omlah_[6] to be
+ a little more careful. The articles necessary are such as the
+ _daftari_[7] can prepare on a mere verbal explanation.
+
+ Every person who now registers a document at Hooghly has to sign
+ his 'sign-manual'. None has offered the smallest objection, and
+ I believe that the practice, if generally adopted, will put an
+ end to all attempts at personation.
+
+ The cogency of the evidence is admitted by every one who takes
+ the trouble to compare a few signatures together, and to try
+ making a few himself. I have taken thousands now in the course
+ of the last twenty years, and (bar smudges and accidents, which
+ are rarely bad enough to be fatal) I am prepared to answer for
+ the identity of every person whose 'sign-manual' I can now
+ produce if I am confronted with him.
+
+ As an instance of the value of the thing, I might suggest that
+ if Roger Tichborne had given his 'sign-manual' on entering the
+ Army on any register, the whole Orton case would have been
+ knocked on the head in ten minutes by requiring Orton to make
+ his sign-manual alongside it for comparison.
+
+ I send this specimen to you because I believe that
+ identification is by no means the unnecessary thing in jails
+ which one might presume it should be. I don't think I need
+ dilate on that point. Here is the means of verifying the
+ identity of every man in jail with the man sentenced by the
+ court, at any moment, day or night. Call the number up and make
+ him sign. If it is he, it is he; if not, he is exposed on the
+ spot. Is No. 1302 really dead, and is that his corpse or a sham
+ one? The corpse has two fingers that will answer the question
+ at once. Is this man brought into jail the real Simon Pure
+ sentenced by the magistrate? The sign-manual on the back of the
+ magistrate's warrant is there to testify, &c.
+
+ For uses in other departments and transactions, especially among
+ illiterate people, it is available with such ease that I quite
+ think its general use would be a substantial contribution
+ towards public morality. Now that it is pretty well known
+ here, I do not believe the man lives who would dare to attempt
+ personation before the Registrar here. The mukhtears[8] all
+ know the potency of the evidence too well.
+
+ Will you kindly give the matter a little patient attention, and
+ then let me ask whether you would let me try it in other jails?
+
+ The impressions will, I doubt not, explain themselves to
+ you without more words. I will say that perhaps in a small
+ proportion of the cases that might come to question the study
+ of the seals by an expert might be advisable, but that in most
+ cases any man of judgement giving his attention to it cannot
+ fail to pronounce right. I have never seen any two signatures
+ about which I remained in doubt after sufficient care.
+
+ Kindly keep the specimens carefully.
+
+ Yours sincerely,
+ W. HERSCHEL.
+
+ [5] The words 'signature', 'sign-manual', 'seal', were used
+ indifferently in this letter for 'finger-print'.
+
+ [6] Clerks.
+
+ [7] Man in charge of stationery.
+
+ [8] Solicitors.
+
+I received one answer, but its tenor was not so encouraging as I had
+hoped. I was out of heart, and did not press my request.
+
+How much all this was regretted afterwards by others I must in simple
+justice record. It came about so quietly and so honourably that it is
+only now that I feel myself free to say publicly how deeply I was
+touched. My first substantive Commissionership had been given me by Sir
+George Campbell, to whose house I was not long after brought back in a
+dying condition from malarial fever. Sir George and his private
+secretary, Mr. Luttman Johnson, took us, my wife and myself, into the
+tenderest care. Years afterwards, in 1906, the latter befriended me in
+the kindliest manner at the annual I.C.S. garden-party, which I but
+rarely attended, and invited me to dine with him that evening. It was a
+party of seven or eight, and the next to arrive were Sir James and Lady
+Bourdillon. His name, when our host introduced us, I only recognized as
+lately Acting Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal. To my great surprise,
+before our hands parted, he told me how often he had wished to meet me,
+to express his constant regret at having let my suggestion slip through
+his hands when he was Registrar-General. He remembered my letter well,
+and had indeed taken action by inquiry concerning my doings in his
+department, but for some reason he had lost sight of the matter.
+Needless to say, we became the firmest of friends on the spot, and I had
+the pleasure of a visit from him afterwards at Oxford. It is some years
+now since he and Mr. Luttman Johnson died. None of us, as far as I know,
+has ever spoken of this fine act of Sir James's except in strict
+privacy.
+
+The Inspector of Jails of 1877, Mr. Beverley, afterwards a judge in the
+High Court of Bengal, is still alive. Writing in 1906, he says,
+regretfully, 'I have no recollection of writing the letter you refer to,
+but I know that, both as Registrar-General and as Inspector of Jails, I
+took great interest in the Finger-print system of identification, of
+which I always regarded you as the Apostle in India'. He too came to see
+me at Oxford after that, with one of his successors in the High Court.
+
+I shall say more farther on in regard to my statement in this 1877
+letter that 'these marks do not change in the course of ten or fifteen
+years'.
+
+During my stay at Hooghly, so near Calcutta, I saw more society in my
+own house than in other stations, and interested my friends with the
+novelty of finger-printing. I give a few of their names to which special
+interest attaches.
+
+Among Indian gentlemen, whose prints were taken at Hooghly in 1877, I do
+not know who are still living; I can only give the names of
+
+ (1) Bābu Dinonāth Pāl, of Hooghly;
+ (2) Bābu Lalit Mohun Singh, of Sibpur;
+ (3) Bābu Upendra Nārāyan Nandi, of Shāhāganj.
+
+Of English friends still living I am allowed to reproduce the print of
+1877, and its repeat in 1913, of Mr. Frank Courthope, well known in
+Sussex and in banking circles in London, (next page).
+
+The next is remarkable. Captain V. H. Haggard, R.N., was a child of
+2¾ years old at Hooghly, 1877. By much ingratiation I succeeded in
+getting a print of his whole hand, and another of three fingers. In
+1913, when on special duty in H.M.S. 'President', he kindly gave me (not
+for the first time) a repeat, this time at the age of 38. The baby print
+bears enlargement beautifully, and I am sure my readers will be
+delighted with the comparison I am thus able to lay before them.
+
+ [Illustration: CAPTAIN V. H. HAGGARD, R. N.
+ 1877 aet. 2¾
+ r. 3 1877 (magnified)
+ Repeat 1913 (magnified)]
+
+ [Illustration: W. F. Courthope.
+ r. 1 At Hooghly, 1877.
+ r. 1 r. 2 Oct. 21, 1913.
+ r. 2 At Hooghly, 1877.]
+
+One of the prints I value most, on personal grounds, is that of Sir
+Theodore Hope, at that time in the Legislative Council of India for
+Bombay. I grieve to say he has died since these words were written. He
+was one of my most honoured college friends in the old Haileybury days
+of 1853.
+
+Among the last prints that I took in India were two at Mussoorie, in the
+Punjab Himālayas, in Sept. 1877; one of my brother Colonel J. Herschel,
+R.E., and one of Dr. J. F. Duthie, of the Forest Department. They are
+both living still, and their repeats to-day are quite good.
+
+To return now to my letter of 1877. I was 'able to say that these marks
+do not change in the course of ten or fifteen years'. I might have said
+eighteen years, for my own marks reached back to 1859; but I was
+steering for safety.
+
+The conviction of the unchanging character of finger-patterns had,
+of course, grown on me only by degrees, as the evidence of time
+accumulated. Among my friends, from Nuddea days onwards, I often took
+second impressions, invariably drawing attention to their identity with
+the former ones. I never came upon any sign of change, bar accident. But
+such comparisons were generally limited to intervals of no more than two
+or three years, owing to the frequent changes of residence incidental to
+Indian service. As time went on it was chiefly the incessant evidence of
+my own ten fingers, and of my whole hand, which wrought in me the
+overwhelming conviction that the lines on the skin persisted
+indefinitely.
+
+ [Illustration: Colonel J. Herschel, Sept. 22, 1877.]
+
+ [Illustration: J. F. Duthie, 1877.]
+
+But besides my own evidence of eighteen years, I had that of my oldest
+college friend, William Waterfield, of almost as long. On March 31,
+1877, he and Mr. (afterwards Sir Theodore) Hope and Mrs. Hope were my
+guests at Hooghly. I took all their impressions and my own on that day,
+noting on Waterfield's that we compared it with his earliest print of
+1860, in Nuddea, seventeen years earlier. We found the agreement, of
+course, complete. Here are the facsimiles.
+
+
+ [Illustration: T. C. Hope, Bo.C.S., at Hooghly, 1877.]
+
+ [Illustration: W. Waterfield
+ July 31, 1860, Nuddea.
+ March 31, 1877, Hooghly.]
+
+If more evidence were required, I was prepared, without hesitation,
+to call on any person whose mark I had taken since I began. It was in
+fact from among those very persons, Natives as well as English, that
+thirteen years later, at Mr. Galton's request, I obtained the repeats
+which, by their much longer persistence then, went so far to prove his
+case to universal conviction.
+
+I close this record with a comparison between three of my own prints,
+taken, one in 1859, one in 1877, and the last to-day, after fifty-seven
+years. For length of persistence they cannot at present be matched.
+
+ [Illustration:
+ (_a_) (_b_) W. J. H., 1859, Arrah (aet. 26).
+ (_c_) W. J. H., March 31, 1877 (aet. 44).
+ (_d_) W. J. H., February 22, 1916 (aet. 83).]
+
+It goes beyond the proper scope of this narrative, but I cannot refrain
+from offering my readers here a striking instance of the almost
+incredible persistency of atomic renovation that takes place in the pads
+of our fingers, in spite of their being more subject to wear than any
+other part of the body. The first was taken at the age of 7¾; the
+next, for Mr. Galton, nine years later. In 1913 my son was in Canada
+when I asked him to send me several repeats. Every print showed the
+minute tell-tale dot which Mr. Galton's sharp eye had noticed twenty-two
+years before. No doubt it was a natal mark. It has anyhow already
+persisted for thirty-two years.
+
+ [Illustration: A. E. H. Herschel, r. 3.
+ 1881, aet. 7¾.
+ 1890, aet. 17.
+ 1913, aet. 40.]
+
+
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+
+When I speak of the 'discovery' of finger-prints nigh sixty years ago, I
+should wish to be understood correctly. I cannot say that I thought of
+it as such until Mr. Galton examined old records in search of earlier
+notices of the subject. What he found had been beyond my ken, and I
+never inquired for myself. The fascination of experiments and the
+impelling object of them were all I cared about. Had it been otherwise I
+should have had an open field for egoism to any extent, for no one
+questioned the novelty of the thing.
+
+The time that has elapsed since Galton's inquiries, without any material
+addition to his ascertained facts, justifies me, I venture to think, in
+speaking of my work as the 'discovery' of the value of finger-prints.
+
+I proceed to show what has been brought to light from other sources.
+
+
+Bewick.
+
+Of modern cases the first known is that of Thomas Bewick. He was a
+wood-engraver, as well as an author, and had a fancy for engraving his
+finger-mark. He printed, as far as I can ascertain, only three
+specimens, by way of ornament to his books.
+
+1. 1809. 'British Birds', p. 190. The impression of the finger appears
+as if obliterating a small scene of a cottage, trees, and a rider, but
+the paper between the lines of the finger is almost all clean.
+
+2. 1818. The 'Receipt'; of which, by Mr. Quaritch's favour, I possess
+one. This is, beyond all possibility of doubt, quite free from any
+tooling. How it was transferred to paper in those days (of which there
+is an indication) I am unable to say, but for his purposes it was an
+original 'finger-print' of Thomas Bewick. Even the fine half-tone
+process of this facsimile cannot reproduce its delicacy.
+
+ [Illustration: Thomas Bewick his mark]
+
+3. 1826. Memorial Edition of Bewick's Works, 1885, on the last page of
+the last volume, under a letter dated 1826, in which he rates some one
+for copying his woodcuts. When I saw it at the British Museum some years
+ago I thought it showed toolwork.
+
+These three seem to be all the specimens now available, and they are
+from three different fingers, of which two are certified to be his own.
+
+Gathering that Mr. Quaritch was exceptionally familiar with Bewick's
+life, I told him that I wished to leave no stone unturned to do ample
+justice to him, if he was known to have done anything more than appears
+above. Mr. Quaritch took the matter up very kindly, and finally informed
+me that he had been unable to trace any writing of Bewick's concerning
+these prints. There seems, therefore, no evidence that he ever took
+impressions of any finger but his own. Now it is true that no one of
+observant habits, and least of all an engraver, could fail to perceive
+the peculiarities of his own finger. The brick-makers of Babylon and
+Egypt, and every printer since fingers were dirtied by printer's ink,
+must have noticed them. But it is a long step from that to a study of
+other men's marks, with a view to identification. What Bewick certainly
+did do might easily have led him to such a study, but it looks as if he
+was satisfied with recognizing his own mark.
+
+Remembering, as I have already said, how one of his marks had struck my
+fancy as a boy, I am disposed to believe that, all unwittingly, I was
+guided to seize upon a thread which Bewick had let fall.
+
+
+Purkinje.
+
+Five years after Bewick, Johannes Purkinje, of Breslau, in 1823, read an
+essay which has been found and examined by Mr. Galton, and partly
+translated on p. 85 of his 1892 work. Purkinje carried his study of the
+patterns on fingers beyond all comparison with Bewick's use of them, of
+whose existence indeed he could hardly have been aware. He worked hard
+on them for a scientific (medical) purpose. It seemed to me strange
+that, going so far as he did, he had not hit upon our idea. To satisfy
+myself I read his work through in 1909. The very last sentence in it
+seemed to strike a light. Referring to 'the varieties of the tonsils,
+and especially of the papillae of the tongue, in different individuals'
+(no mention of fingers), he finishes the sentence and his essay by
+saying: 'from all which [varieties] sound materials will be furnished
+for that individual knowledge of the man which is of no less importance
+than a general knowledge of him is, especially in the practice of
+medicine.' A fine conclusion indeed, and a stimulating; but no part of
+his essay conveys an inkling of identification by means of any of the
+individual varieties on which he always lays stress, not even his
+pioneer work in the classification of the markings on fingers.
+
+ [Illustration: A _tep-sai_ of Bengal.]
+
+ [Illustration: A finger-print.]
+
+ [Illustration: THE TOKEN-SIGNATURES OF THOSE WHO CANNOT WRITE OR
+ READ, IN SEVERAL CASTES. YEAR 1865. DATE 8 FEBRUARY.
+
+ 1. Cultivator; a harrow. 2. Barber; a mirror. 3. Shop-keeper;
+ scales. 4. Carpenter; a chisel. 5. A Washerman's board. 6.
+ Female; a bracelet. 7. Widow; a spindle. 8. Caste uncertain;
+ scissors. 9. Family Priest; an almanac roll.]
+
+
+Bengal.
+
+The common way for illiterates to sign is to wet the tip of one finger
+with ink from a pen, and then touch the document (leaving a small black
+blot) where we touch a wafer. The mark so made is called '_tep-sai_',
+'tep' meaning 'pressure' by touch or grip, and 'sai' meaning 'token'
+(I do not know the etymology). I ask my readers now to compare the
+'_tep-sai_' with the 'finger-print' alongside it, and to say whether the
+_tep-sai_ could afford any means of identification by comparison with
+another blot from the same finger. Illiterates who can hold a pen make a
+cross, as we do, called '_dhera-sai_'; others, more ambitious, indicate
+their caste by symbols. For the interest of the thing I give some
+tracings from a collection of such caste-marks which I had made for this
+purpose when I was Magistrate of Midnapore in 1865.
+
+When I was introducing actual registration I asked the principal member
+of my Bar to give me his opinion about the new marks. His answer was as
+follows (the English is of course his own):
+
+ Hooghly,
+ The 21st Aug./77.
+
+ DEAR SIR,
+
+ I have examined the impressions made in these papers, and I
+ think each can be distinguished from the others. There are also
+ so many peculiarities in each impression that it cannot be
+ forged, and I think it would be a preventive to forgery if all
+ documents, specially by females, or males who do not know to
+ read or write, would contain impressions by fingers.
+
+ Yours faithfully,
+ ESHAN CHUNDRA MITRA.
+
+I value this letter highly, for Eshan Chundra was Government Pleader at
+Hooghly, and in frequent request in Calcutta. No native lawyer of his
+large practice could have written thus if he had ever known of this
+method of signature before.
+
+Trustworthy information in my hands is to the effect that attestations
+by the finger in China are like Bengali _tep-sais_, and nothing more.
+
+
+China.
+
+The nearest approach to our use of finger-prints that I have found in
+China came to hand thus:
+
+An Oxford friend, Mr. Bullock, subsequently elected Professor of
+Chinese, had been interpreter to the Legation in Peking. Talking with
+him about the methods of signing deeds in China, he told me that the
+finger-tip (not finger-print) method was in ordinary use, but he was
+careful to point out also that to his knowledge ever since he went to
+Peking, about 1868, Chinese bankers had been in the habit of impressing
+their thumbs on the notes they issued; and he had no doubt the custom
+was much older than that. This was startling, but he kindly procured for
+me the bank-note which I here show in facsimile; with it came this
+explanation of such thumb-marks, given by his friend in China:
+
+'They are imprinted partly on the counterfoil and partly on the note
+itself, so that when presented its genuineness can be tested at once.'
+
+That is, they play the part of what is technically called the 'scroll'
+in our cheques.
+
+ [Illustration: A CHINESE BANK NOTE, 1898]
+
+My readers may accept it that the ink used was the same Indian ink with
+which the Chinese characters on the note were written. That is the
+unhesitating judgement of such an expert as Mr. Galton, who examined it.
+The difference between a water ink and printer's ink for identification
+is enormous. Blood on the fingers has occasionally left impressions that
+fortunately sufficed to reveal the murderer; but, as a rule, wet fingers
+leave only smudges as useless as this one. It is quite certain,
+therefore, that no one in the habit of impressing his thumb-mark as this
+banker did, would use water ink, if he depended on recognizing it as his
+own. In short, the smudge on the bank-note was placed there in order to
+identify the two parts of a piece of paper after severance, not to prove
+who placed it so. My readers may see what exquisite delicacy of detail
+can be obtained by printer's ink, when so desired, if they will examine
+a fine skin impression with a magnifying-glass; even the pores along the
+ridges can be seen as white dots. For practical purposes, however, such
+extreme delicacy as this is not needed.
+
+This difference of ink suggests a further remark. The Chinese have used
+printer's ink for ages. If they aimed at identification they would
+surely have discovered its great value for clear impressions, and its
+use could never have died out. On the other hand, a method of
+identification depending on water ink could never have survived for such
+strict work as our finger-prints. On the palm of the hand it can give a
+fairly good impression for such simple identification as is wanted
+(say) for passports, because the large creases will obviously be those
+of the bearer of the passport, or as obviously not. These lines of the
+palm, so well known in palmistry, are as clear to a man as the shape of
+his hand, while those on the pads of his own fingers are scarcely
+noticed even now by one man in a million. The science of identification
+by means of the pads cannot, in my opinion, date farther back than 1858,
+when I happened to use oil-ink, which was not used for _tep-sais_.
+
+The ablest defence of the claims of antiquity that I have seen is by a
+Japanese writer, Kumagusu Minakata, whose letter to 'Nature', Dec. 27,
+1894, appears to be as exhaustive as it is able; but I hope that this
+paper will satisfy him that the finger-print system of our day has no
+connexion with the methods he describes. The 'nail-marks' of which he
+speaks must be utterly useless for identification; yet he treats all
+manner of impressions alike, and tells us indeed that they are all known
+by the one name of 'hand-mark'. I fear that he has failed, like some
+other writers,[9] to see the definite force of the word 'identification'
+in the finger-print system. It means that if a man can be indicated
+whose finger-print agrees with that on a document, he is identified with
+the man who put that one there. That is all we want. But it will be seen
+that there must be two impressions at least, that will bear comparison,
+to constitute 'identification'.
+
+ [9] I include a too brief notice of the subject by Professor Giles
+ of Cambridge, in his recent work 'Civilization of China', p. 118,
+ and an article in the 'Nineteenth Century' of December 1904.
+
+None of the writers who have undertaken the defence appears to perceive
+this need of a second impression if the issue of identity turns on any
+kind of finger-mark. Repudiations cannot have been rare; tribunals must
+occasionally have been invoked; yet no instance is quoted of decision by
+demand for a second impression.
+
+It seems then that these marks were not made, as ours are, expressly to
+challenge comparison; that, in fact, they offer no points for
+comparison.
+
+In conclusion, it is hard to believe that a system so practically useful
+as this could have been known in the great lands of the East for
+generations past, without arresting the notice of Western statesmen,
+merchants, travellers, and students. Yet the knowledge never reached us.
+
+
+ FINIS.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Origin of Finger-Printing, by
+William J. Herschel
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ORIGIN OF FINGER-PRINTING ***
+
+***** This file should be named 34859-0.txt or 34859-0.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/8/5/34859/
+
+Produced by Eric Hutton and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.