diff options
Diffstat (limited to '34807-h/34807-h.htm')
| -rw-r--r-- | 34807-h/34807-h.htm | 10952 |
1 files changed, 10952 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/34807-h/34807-h.htm b/34807-h/34807-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c50e817 --- /dev/null +++ b/34807-h/34807-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,10952 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> +<head> + <meta name="generator" content= + "HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 11 February 2007), see www.w3.org" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" /> + + <title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of WHAT WAS THE GUNPOWDER PLOT? THE TRADITIONAL + STORY TESTED BY ORIGINAL EVIDENCE, by JOHN GERARD, S.J.</title> + <style type="text/css"> + p { margin-top: .45em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .45em; + text-indent: 1.25em; + } + + .ni { text-indent: 0em;} + + .jhil { text-align: justify; padding-left:1.25em; text-indent:-1.25em; font-size: 0.85em; } + + .right { text-align: right;} + .center {text-align: center;} + + .g {letter-spacing: 5px;} + .g3 {letter-spacing: 3px;} + .g2 {letter-spacing: 2px;} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; + font-weight: 500; + clear: both; + } + hr { width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 90%;} + + td.rpad {width:50%; padding:0px 10px 0px 0px;} + td.lpad {width:50%; padding:0px 0px 0px 10px;} + + body{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + + .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 90%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + } /* page numbers */ + .pagenuml { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 0%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: left; + } /* page numbers */ + + .linenum {position: absolute; top: auto; left: 4%;} /* poetry number */ + .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + .sidenote {width: 20%; padding-bottom: .5em; padding-top: .5em; + padding-left: .5em; padding-right: .5em; margin-left: 1em; + float: right; clear: right; margin-top: 1em; + font-size: smaller; color: black; background: #eeeeee; border: dashed 1px;} + + .bb {border-bottom: solid 2px;} + .bl {border-left: solid 2px;} + .bt {border-top: solid 2px;} + .br {border-right: solid 2px;} + .bbox {border: solid 2px;} + + .center {text-align: center;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .u {text-decoration: underline;} + + .td6 {width: 6%;} + .td10c {text-align: center; width: 10%;} + .td10r {text-align: right; width: 10%;} + .td80j {text-align: justify; width: 80%; text-indent: 1.25em;} + .td80jni {text-align: justify; width: 80%; text-indent: 0em;} + .td80jhi {text-align: justify; padding-left:1.25em; text-indent:-1.25em;} + .td90lni {text-align: left; width: 90%; text-indent: 0em;} + .td80jhil {width: 50%; padding:0px 10px 0px 0px; text-align: justify; padding-left:1.25em; text-indent:-1.25em;} + .td80jhir {border-left: 1px solid black; width: 50%; padding:0px 0px 0px 10px; text-align: justify; padding-left:1.25em; text-indent:-1.25em;} + + .caption {font-weight: 750;} + + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center; display: block;} + + .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: + 1em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .footnotes {background: #eeeeee; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 4em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + span.c17 {text-decoration: overline;} + h4.c16 {font-style: italic} + div.c15 {width: 300px;} + hr.c14 {width: 45%;} + div.c13 {width: 556px;} + div.c12 {width: 580px;} + span.c11 {text-decoration: overline} + span.c10 {margin-left: 1em;} + div.c9 {width: 536px;} + div.c8 {width: 510px;} + div.c7 {width: 600px;} + p.c6 {font-style: italic} + p.c5 {margin-left: 1.25em;} + span.c4 {margin-left: 1.25em;} + div.c3 {width: 120px;} + hr.c2 {width: 65%;} + div.c1 {width: 497px;} + </style> +</head> + +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of What was the Gunpowder Plot?, by John Gerard + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: What was the Gunpowder Plot? + The Traditional Story Tested by Original Evidence + +Author: John Gerard + +Release Date: January 1, 2011 [EBook #34807] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WHAT WAS THE GUNPOWDER PLOT? *** + + + + +Produced by Robert Cicconetti, Adam Styles and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries) + + + + + + +</pre> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <p class="ni">TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This text makes extensive use of archaic spellings + in quoted material which has not been amended or modernized. Where typographic errors + have been repaired, they are detailed in further transcribers' notes at the end of + the text.</p> + </div> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[Pg ii]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c1"><a name="image1" id="image1"></a><img src="images/image1.png" + width="497" height="800" alt="" title="" /></div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[Pg iii]</a></span></p> + + <h2 class="g3"><small>WHAT WAS THE</small><br /> + GUNPOWDER PLOT?</h2> + + <h5 class="g2">THE TRADITIONAL STORY TESTED BY<br /> + <br /> + ORIGINAL EVIDENCE</h5> + + <h4><span class="smcap">by</span></h4> + + <h3 class="g2"><span class="smcap">John Gerard, S.J.</span></h3> + + <div class="figcenter c3"><a name="image2" id="image2"></a><img src="images/image2.png" + width="120" height="114" alt="" title="" /></div> + + <h4><span class="smcap"><span class="g2">LONDON<br /> + OSGOOD, McILVAINE & CO.</span><br /> + <small>45, Albemarle Street, W.<br /> + 1897</small></span></h4> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="PREFACE" id="PREFACE"></a>PREFACE.</h2> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">The</span> following study of the Gunpowder Plot has + grown out of the accidental circumstance that, having undertaken to read a paper before + the Historical Research Society, at Archbishop's House, Westminster, as the day on + which it was to be read chanced to be the 5th of November,<a name="FN1A" id= + "FN1A"></a><a href="#FN1"><sup>[1]</sup></a> I was asked to take the famous conspiracy + for my subject. It was with much reluctance that I agreed to do so, believing, as I + then did, that there was absolutely nothing fresh to say upon this topic, that no + incident in our annals had been more thoroughly threshed out, and that in regard of + none, so far, at least, as its broader outlines are concerned, was the truth more + clearly established.</p> + + <p>When, however, I turned to the sources whence our knowledge of the transaction is + derived, and in particular to the original documents upon which it is ultimately based, + I was startled to find how grave were the doubts and difficulties which suggested + themselves at every turn, while, though slowly and gradually, yet with ever gathering + force, the conviction forced itself upon me, that, not merely in its details is the + traditional story unworthy of credit, but that all the evidence points to a conclusion + fundamentally at <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[Pg + vi]</a></span>variance with it. Nothing contributed so powerfully to this conviction as + to find that every fresh line of reasoning or channel of information which could be + discovered inevitably tended, in one way or another, towards the same result. In the + following pages are presented to the reader the principal arguments which have wrought + this change of view in my own mind.<sup><a name="FN2A" id="FN2A"></a><a href= + "#FN2">[2]</a></sup></p> + + <p>I cannot pretend to furnish any full or wholly satisfactory answer to the question + which stands upon the title-page. The real history of the Plot in all its stages we + shall, in all probability, never know. If, however, we cannot satisfy ourselves of the + truth, it will be much to ascertain what is false; to convince ourselves that the + account of the matter officially supplied, and almost universally accepted, is + obviously untrue, and that the balance of probability lies heavily against those who + invented it, as having been the real plotters, devising and working the scheme for + their own ends.</p> + + <p>Neither have I any wish to ignore, or to extenuate, the objections which militate + against such a conclusion, objections arising from considerations of a general + character, rather than from any positive evidence. Why, it may reasonably be asked, if + the government of the day were ready to go so far as is alleged, did they not go + further? Why, being supremely anxious to incriminate the priests, did they not + fabricate unequivocal evidence against them, instead of satisfying themselves with what + appears to us far from conclusive? Why did they encumber their tale with incidents, + which, if they did not really occur, could serve <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span>only to damage it, inasmuch as we, at this + distance of time, can argue that they are impossible and absurd? How is it, moreover, + that the absurdity was not patent to contemporaries, and was not urged by those who had + every reason to mislike and mistrust the party in power?</p> + + <p>Considerations such as these undoubtedly deserve all attention, and must be fully + weighed, but while they avail to establish a certain presumption in favour of the + official story, I cannot but think that the sum of probabilities tells strongly the + other way. It must be remembered that three centuries ago the intrinsic likelihood or + unlikelihood of a tale did not go for much, and the accounts of plots in particular + appear to have obtained general credence in proportion as they were incredible, as the + case of Squires a few years earlier, and of Titus Oates somewhat later, sufficiently + testify. It is moreover as difficult for us to enter into the crooked and complex + methods of action which commended themselves to the statesmen of the period, as to + appreciate the force of the cumbrous and abusive harangues which earned for Sir Edward + Coke the character of an incomparable pleader. On the other hand, it appears certain + that they who had so long played the game must have understood it best, and, whatever + else may be said of them, they always contrived to win. In regard of Father Garnet, for + example, we may think the evidence adduced by the prosecution quite insufficient, but + none the less it in fact availed not only to send him to the gallows, but to brand him + in popular estimation for generations, and even for centuries, as the arch-traitor to + whose machinations the whole enterprise was due. <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span>In the case of some individuals + obnoxious to the government, it seems evident that downright forgery was actually + practised.</p> + + <p>The question of Father Garnet's complicity, though usually considered as the one + point in connection with the Plot requiring to be discussed, is not treated in the + following pages. It is doubtless true that to prove the conspiracy to have been a trick + of State, is not the same thing as proving that he was not entangled in it; but, at the + same time, the first point, if it can be established, will deprive the other of almost + all its interest. Nevertheless, Father Garnet's case will still require to be fully + treated on its own merits, but this cannot be done within the limits of such an inquiry + as the present. It is not by confining our attention to one isolated incident in his + career, nor by discussing once again the familiar documents connected therewith, that + we can form a sound and satisfactory judgment about him. For this purpose, full + consideration must be given to what has hitherto been almost entirely ignored, the + nature and character of the man, as exhibited especially during the eighteen years of + his missionary life in England, during most of which period he acted as the superior of + his brother Jesuits. There exist abundant materials for his biography, in his official + and confidential correspondence, preserved at Stonyhurst and elsewhere, and not till + the information thus supplied shall have been duly utilized will it be possible to + judge whether the part assigned to him by his enemies in this wild and wicked design + can, even conceivably, represent the truth. It may, I trust, be possible at no distant + date to attempt this work, but it is not possible now, and to introduce this + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</a></span>topic into our + present discussion would only confuse the issue which is before us.</p> + + <p>Except in one or two instances, I have judged it advisable, for the sake of + clearness, to modernize the spelling of documents quoted in the text. In the notes they + are usually given in their original form.</p> + + <p>I have to acknowledge my indebtedness in many particulars to Mr. H.W. Brewer, who + not only contributes valuable sketches to illustrate the narrative, but has furnished + many important notes and suggestions, based upon his exhaustive knowledge of ancient + London. I have to thank the Marquis of Salisbury for permission to examine MSS. in the + Hatfield collection, and his lordship's librarian, Mr. Gunton, for information supplied + from the same source. Through the courtesy of the Deputy-Keeper of the Public Records, + every facility has been afforded me for consulting the precious documents contained in + the "Gunpowder Plot Book." The Dean of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, has kindly given + me access to an important MS. in the College Library; and I have been allowed by the + Rector of Stonyhurst to retain in my hands Father Greenway's MS. history of the Plot + during the whole period of my work. The proprietors of the <i>Daily Graphic</i> have + allowed me to use two sketches of the interior of "Guy Faukes' Cellar," and one of his + lantern, originally prepared by Mr. Brewer for that journal.<span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</a></span></p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><a name="FN1" id="FN1"></a><a href="#FN1A"><sup>[1]</sup></a> 1894.</p> + + <p class="ni"><a name="FN2" id="FN2"></a><sup><a href="#FN2A">[2]</a></sup> Some of + these have been partially set forth in a series of six articles appearing in <i>The + Month</i>, December 1894—May, 1895.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">[Pg xi]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CONTENTS" id="CONTENTS"></a>CONTENTS.</h2> + + <table> + <tr> + <td class="td10c"><small><small>CHAP.</small></small></td> + + <td class="td80j"></td> + + <td class="td10c"><small><small>PAGE</small></small></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">I.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The State of the Question</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Disclosure of the Plot—Arrest of Guy Faukes—Flight + of his associates—Their abortive insurrection—Their fate—The + crime charged on Catholics in general—Garnet and other Jesuits proclaimed as + the ringleaders—Capture of Garnet—Efforts to procure evidence against + him—His execution—Previous history of the Plot as traditionally + narrated; Proceedings and plans of the conspirators—Manner of the + discovery.<br /> + <span class="c4">Reasons for suspecting the truth of this history—Previous + plots originated or manipulated by the government—Suspicious circumstances + respecting the Gunpowder Plot in particular—Essential points of the + inquiry.</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">II.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Persons Concerned</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_19">19</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury—His character variously + estimated—Discreditable incidents of his career—Contemporary judgments + of him—His unpopularity—His political difficulties largely dissipated + in consequence of the Plot.<br /> + <span class="c4">His hatred of and hostility towards the Catholics—Their + numbers and importance—Their hopes from King James, and their + disappointment—The probability that some would have recourse to + violence—The conspirators known as men likely to seek such a + remedy—Their previous history—Difficulties and contradictions in regard + of their character.</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">[Pg + xii]</a></span>III.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Opinion of Contemporaries and + Historians</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">The government at once suspected of having contrived or + fomented the Plot—Persistence of these suspicions, to which historians for + more than a century bear witness—No fresh information accounts for their + disappearance.</td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">IV.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Traditional Story</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_54">54</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">The old House of Lords and its surroundings—House hired + by the conspirators—They attempt to dig a mine beneath the Peers' + Chamber—Difficulties and improbabilities of the account—The "Cellar" + hired—Its position and character—The gunpowder bought and + stored—Further problems concerning it—The conspirators' + plans—Contradictions respecting them—Their wild and absurd + character—Impossibility of the supposition that the proceedings escaped the + notice of the government.</td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">V.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Government Intelligence + Department</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Evidence that the government were fully aware of what was in + progress—Various intelligence supplied to them—Cecil's uneasiness on + account of the spread of Catholicity, and the king's communication with the + pope—His evident determination to force on James a policy of + intolerance—He intimates that a great move is about to be made, and + acknowledges to information concerning the conspirators and their schemes—His + political methods illustrated.</td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">VI.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The "Discovery"</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_114">114</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Importance of the letter received by Lord + Monteagle—Extraordinary prominence given to it—Monteagle's + character—He receives the letter—Suspicious circumstances connected + with its arrival—It is shown to Cecil—Hopeless contradictions of the + official narrative as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">[Pg + xiii]</a></span> to what followed—Impossibility of ascertaining what actually + occurred—The French version of the story—The conduct of the government + at variance with their own professions—Their inexplicable delay in making the + discovery—They take no precautions against the recurrence of danger—The + mystery of the gunpowder—Incredibility of the official narration.</td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">VII.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Percy, Catesby, and Tresham</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_147">147</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Probability that the government had an agent among the + conspirators—Suspicious circumstances regarding Percy—His private + life—His alleged intercourse with Cecil—His death.<br /> + <span class="c4">Catesby and Tresham likewise accused of secret dealings with + Cecil—Catesby's falsehood towards his associates and Father + Garnet—Tresham's strange conduct after the discovery—His mysterious + death.</span><br /> + <span class="c4">Alleged positive evidence against the government.</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">VIII.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Government's Case</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_163">163</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">A monopoly secured for the official narrative, which is + admittedly untruthful—Suspicions suggested by such a course, especially in + such a case—The confessions of Faukes and Winter, on which this narrative is + based, deserve no credit—Nor does the evidence of Bates against + Greenway—Indications of foul play in regard of Robert Winter—The case + of Owen, Baldwin and Cresswell; assertions made respecting them of which no proof + can be produced—Efforts to implicate Sir Walter Raleigh and + others—Falsification of evidence—The service of forgers employed.<br /> + <span class="c4">Catholic writers have drawn their accounts from the sources + provided by the government.</span><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xiv" id= + "Page_xiv">[Pg xiv]</a></span></td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c">IX.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Sequel</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_209">209</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10c"></td> + + <td class="td80jhi">Cecil well informed as to the real nature of the conspiracy, + and apprehends no danger from it—At once turns it to account by promoting + anti-Catholic legislation—Honour and popularity resulting to him—Ruin + of the Earl of Northumberland—Cecil's manifesto—His alleged attempt to + start a second plot.<br /> + <span class="c4">The popular history of the Plot, and how it was + circulated—Singular suitability of the Fifth of November for the + "Discovery."</span><br /> + <span class="c4">Summary of the argument.</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"></td> + </tr> + </table> + + <table> + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix A. Notes on the + Illustrations</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_235">235</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix B. Sir Everard Digby's letter to + Salisbury</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_245">245</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix C. The Question of + Succession</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_249">249</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix D. The Spanish Treason</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_251">251</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix E. Site of Percy's + Lodging</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_251">251</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix F. Enrolment of + Conspirators</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_252">252</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix G. Henry Wright the + Informer</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_254">254</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix H. Monteagle's Letter to King + James</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_256">256</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix I. Epitaph on Peter + Heiwood</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_258">258</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix K. The Use of Torture</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_259">259</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix L. Myths and Legends of the + Plot</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_260">260</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix M. Memorial Inscriptions in the + Tower</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_264">264</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Appendix N. Guy Faukes' Published + Confession</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_268">268</a></td> + </tr> + </table> + + <table> + <tr> + <td class="td90lni"><span class="smcap">Index</span></td> + + <td class="td10c"><a href="#Page_279">279</a></td> + </tr> + </table> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">[Pg xv]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS" id="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS"></a>LIST OF + ILLUSTRATIONS.</h2> + + <table> + <tr> + <td class="td10r"></td> + + <td class="td80j"></td> + + <td class="td10r"><small><small>PAGE</small></small></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">1.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Medal Commemorative of the Gunpowder + Plot</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><i><a href="#image2">Title-page</a></i></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">2.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">The Gunpowder Plot I.</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><i><a href="#image1">Frontispiece</a></i></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">3.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class= + "smcap"> " " " II.</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image12">90</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">4.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"> + " " " III.</td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image22">215</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">5.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"> + " " " IV.</td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image23">227</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">6.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class= + "smcap"> " " " V.</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image24">229</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">7.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Discovery of the Gunpowder Plot</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image16">136</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">8.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Monteagle and Letter</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image14">115</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">9.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Arrest of Faukes</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image15">125</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">10.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Guy Faukes' Lantern</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image17">139</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">11.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Group of Conspirators</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image3">3</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">12.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Thomas Percy</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image18">149</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">13.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Houses of Parliament in 1605</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image4">56-7</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">14.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Ground Plan of the Same</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image6">59</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">15.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">House of Lords in 1807</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image7">61</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">16.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Interior of House of Lords, + 1755</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image13">97</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">17.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Interior of "Cellar"</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image8">71</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">18.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Arches from "Cellar"</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image10">75</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">19.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Vault under Painted Chamber</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image9">73</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">20.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Cell adjoining Painted Chamber</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image11">83</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">21.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Facsimile of part of Winter's Confession, + Nov. 23</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image19">168</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">22.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Signatures of Faukes and + Oldcorne</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image20">173</a></td> + </tr> + + <tr> + <td class="td10r">23.</td> + + <td class="td80jni"><span class="smcap">Facsimile of part of Faukes' Confession of + Nov. 9</span></td> + + <td class="td10r"><a href="#image21">199</a></td> + </tr> + </table> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">[Pg xvi]</a></span></p> + + <p class="c5">"Quis hæc posteris sic narrare poterit, ut facta non ficta esse + videantur?"</p> + + <p class="c5">"Ages to come will be in doubt whether it were a fact or a fiction."</p> + + <p class="right c6">Sir Edw. Coke on the trial of the Conspirators.</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="WHAT_WAS_THE_GUNPOWDER_PLOT" id="WHAT_WAS_THE_GUNPOWDER_PLOT"></a>WHAT WAS + THE GUNPOWDER PLOT?</h2> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I.</h2> + + <h3>THE STATE OF THE QUESTION.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">On</span> the morning of Tuesday, the 5th of + November, 1605, which day was appointed for the opening of a new Parliamentary session, + London rang with the news that in the course of the night a diabolical plot had been + discovered, by which the king and legislature were to have been destroyed at a blow. In + a chamber beneath the House of Lords had been found a great quantity of gunpowder, and + with it a man, calling himself John Johnson, who, finding that the game was up, fully + acknowledged his intention to have fired the magazine while the royal speech was being + delivered, according to custom, overhead, and so to have blown King, Lords, and Commons + into the air. At the same time, he doggedly refused to say who were his accomplices, or + whether he had any.</p> + + <p>This is the earliest point at which the story of the Gunpowder Plot can be taken up + with any certainty. Of what followed, at least as to the main outlines, we <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>are sufficiently well informed. + Johnson, whose true name was presently found to be Guy, or Guido, Faukes,<sup><a name= + "FN3A" id="FN3A"></a><a href="#FN3">[3]</a></sup> proved, it is true, a most obstinate + and unsatisfactory witness, and obstinately refused to give any evidence which might + incriminate others. But the actions of his confederates quickly supplied the + information which he withheld. It was known that the "cellar" in which the powder was + found, as well as a house adjacent, had been hired in the name of one Thomas Percy, a + Catholic gentleman, perhaps a kinsman, and certainly a dependent, of the Earl of + Northumberland. It was now discovered that he and others of his acquaintance had fled + from London on the previous day, upon receipt of intelligence that the plot seemed at + least to be suspected. Not many hours later the fugitives were heard of in + Warwickshire, Worcestershire, and Staffordshire, the native counties of several amongst + them, attempting to rally others to their desperate fortunes, and to levy war against + the crown. For this purpose they forcibly seized cavalry horses<sup><a name="FN4A" id= + "FN4A"></a><a href="#FN4">[4]</a></sup> at Warwick, and arms at Whewell Grange, a seat + of Lord Windsor's. These violent proceedings having raised the country behind them, + they were pursued by the sheriffs with what forces could be got together, and finally + brought to bay at Holbeche, in Staffordshire, the residence of one Stephen Littleton, a + Catholic gentleman.</p> + + <p>There proved to have been thirteen men in all who had undoubtedly been participators + in the treason. Of these Faukes, as we have seen, was already in the <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span>hands of justice. Another, + Francis Tresham, had not fled with his associates, but remained quietly, and without + attempting concealment, in London, even going to the council and offering them his + services; after a week he was taken into custody. The eleven who either betook + themselves to the country, or were already there, awaiting the issue of the enterprise, + and prepared to co-operate in the rising which was to be its sequel, were Robert + Catesby, Thomas Percy, Robert and Thomas Winter, John and Christopher Wright, John + Grant, Robert Keyes, Ambrose Rokewood, Sir Everard Digby,and Thomas Bates. All were + Catholics, and all, with the exception of Bates, Catesby's servant, were "gentlemen of + blood and name," some of them, notably Robert Winter, Rokewood, Digby, and Tresham, + being men of ample fortune.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image3" id="image3"></a><img src="images/image3.png" width="600" height= + "316" alt="THE CONSPIRATORS, FROM A PRINT PUBLISHED AT AMSTERDAM." title="" /> + <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">the conspirators, from a print published at + amsterdam.</span></span> + </div> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span></p> + + <p>On Friday, November 8th, three days after the discovery, Sir Richard Walsh, sheriff + of Worcestershire, attacked Holbeche. Catesby, Percy, and the two Wrights were killed + or mortally wounded in the assault. The others were taken prisoners on the spot or in + its neighbourhood, with the exception of Robert Winter, who, accompanied by their host, + Stephen Littleton, contrived to elude capture for upwards of two months, being at last + apprehended, in January, at Hagley Hall, Worcestershire. All the prisoners were at once + taken up to London, and being there confined, were frequently and diligently examined + by the council, to trace, if possible, farther ramifications of the conspiracy, and + especially to inculpate the Catholic clergy.<sup><a name="FN5A" id="FN5A"></a><a href= + "#FN5">[5]</a></sup> Torture, it is evident, was employed with this object.</p> + + <p>Meanwhile, on November 9th, King James addressed to his Parliament a speech, wherein + he declared that the abominable crime which had been intended was the direct result of + Catholic principles, Popery being "the true mystery of iniquity." In like manner + Chichester, the Lord Deputy in Ireland, was informed by Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, his + Majesty's Secretary of State, that the Plot was an "abominable practice of Rome and + Satan,"<sup><a name="FN6A" id="FN6A"></a><a href="#FN6">[6]</a></sup> while the monarch + himself sent word to Sir John Harington that "these designs were not formed by a few," + that "the whole legion of Catholics were consulted," that "the priests were to + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span>pacify their + consciences, and the Pope confirm a general absolution for this glorious + deed."<sup><a name="FN7A" id="FN7A"></a><a href="#FN7">[7]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Then follows an interval during which we know little of the course of events which + were proceeding in the seclusion of the council-room and torture-chamber; but on + December 4th we find Cecil complaining that he could obtain little or no evidence + against the really important persons: "Most of the prisoners," he writes,<sup><a name= + "FN8A" id="FN8A"></a><a href="#FN8">[8]</a></sup> "have wilfully forsworn that the + priests knew anything in particular, and obstinately refuse to be accusers of them, + yea, what torture soever they be put to."</p> + + <p>On January 15th, 1605-6, a proclamation was issued declaring that the Jesuit + fathers, John Gerard, Henry Garnet, and Oswald Greenway, or Tesimond, were proved to + have been "peculiarly practisers" in the treason, and offering a reward for their + apprehension. On the 21st of the same month Parliament met, having been prorogued + immediately after the king's speech of November 9th, and four days later an Act was + passed for the perpetual solemnization of the anniversary of the projected crime, the + preamble whereof charged its guilt upon "Many malignant and devilish papists, jesuits, + and seminary priests, much envying the true and free possession of the Gospel by the + nation, under the greatest, most learned, and most religious monarch who had ever + occupied the throne."<sup><a name="FN9A" id="FN9A"></a><a href="#FN9">[9]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In consequence of this Act, was introduced into the Anglican liturgy the celebrated + Fifth of November service, in the collect of which the king, royal family, <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span>nobility, clergy, and commons + are spoken of as having been "by Popish treachery appointed as sheep to the slaughter, + in a most barbarous and savage manner, beyond the examples of former ages;" while the + day itself was marked in the calendar as the "Papists' Conspiracy."</p> + + <p>It will thus be seen that the Powder Plot was by this time officially stigmatized as + the work of the Catholic body in general, and in particular of their priests; thus + acquiring an importance and a significance which could not be attributed to it were it + but the wild attempt of a few turbulent men. As a natural corollary we find Parliament + busily engaged upon measures to insure the more effectual execution of the penal + laws.<sup><a name="FN10A" id="FN10A"></a><a href="#FN10">[10]</a></sup></p> + + <p>On January 27th the surviving conspirators, Robert and Thomas Winter, Faukes, Grant, + Rokewood, Keyes, Digby, and Bates,<sup><a name="FN11A" id="FN11A"></a><a href= + "#FN11">[11]</a></sup> were put upon their trial. In the indictment preferred against + them, it was explicitly stated that the Plot was contrived by Garnet, Gerard, Greenway, + and other Jesuits, to whose traitorous persuasions the prisoners at the bar had + wickedly yielded. All were found guilty, Digby, Robert Winter, Grant, and Bates being + executed at the west end of St. Paul's Church, on January the 30th, and the rest on the + following day in Old Palace Yard.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span></p> + + <p>On the very day upon which the first company suffered, Father Garnet, whose + hiding-place was known, and who had been closely invested for nine days, was captured, + in company with another Jesuit, Father Oldcorne. The latter, though never charged with + knowledge of the plot, was put to death for having aided and abetted Garnet in his + attempt to escape. Garnet himself, being brought to London, was lodged first in the + Gatehouse and afterwards in the Tower.</p> + + <p>As we have seen, he had already been proclaimed as a traitor, and "particular + practiser" in the conspiracy, and had moreover been officially described as the head + and front of the treason. Of the latter charge, after his capture, nothing was ever + heard. Of his participation, proofs, it appeared, still remained to be discovered, for + on the 3rd of March Cecil still spoke of them as in the future.<sup><a name="FN12A" id= + "FN12A"></a><a href="#FN12">[12]</a></sup> In order to obtain the required evidence of + his complicity, Garnet was examined three-and-twenty times before the council, and, in + addition, various artifices were practised which need not now be detailed. On the 28th + of March, 1606, he was brought to trial, and on May 3rd he was hanged at St. Paul's. + The Gunpowder Conspirators were thenceforth described in government publications as + "Garnet, a Jesuit, and his confederates."</p> + + <p>Such is, in outline, the course of events which followed the discovery of November + 5th, all circum<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg + 8]</a></span>stances being here omitted which are by possibility open to dispute.</p> + + <p>It will probably be maintained, as our best and most circumspect historians appear + to have assumed, that we are in possession of information enabling us to construct a + similar sketch of what preceded and led up to these events,—whatever obscurity + there may be regarding the complicity of those whose participation would invest the + plot with the significance which has been attributed to it. If it were indeed but the + individual design of a small knot of men, acting for themselves and of themselves, + then, though they were all Catholics, and were actuated by a desire to aid the Catholic + cause, the crime they intended could not justly be charged upon the body of their + co-religionists. It would be quite otherwise if Catholics in general were shown to have + countenanced it, or even if such representative men as members of the priesthood were + found to have approved so abominable a project, or even to have consented to it, or + knowingly kept silence regarding it. Of the complicity of Catholics in general or of + their priesthood as a body there is no proof whatever, nor has it ever been seriously + attempted to establish such a charge. As to the three Jesuits already named, who alone + have been seriously accused, there is no proof, the sufficiency of which may not be + questioned. But as to the fact that they who originated the Plot were Catholics, that + they acted simply with the object of benefiting their Church, and that the nation most + narrowly escaped an appalling disaster at their hands, can there be any reasonable + doubt? Is not the account of their proceedings, to be read in any work on the + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span>subject, as + absolutely certain as anything in our history?</p> + + <p>This account is as follows. About a year after the accession of James + I.,<sup><a name="FN13A" id="FN13A"></a><a href="#FN13">[13]</a></sup> when it began to + be evident that the hopes of toleration at his hands, which the Catholics had + entertained, were to be disappointed, Robert Catesby, a man of strong character, and + with an extraordinary power of influencing others, bethought him in his wrath of this + means whereby to take summary vengeance at once upon the monarch and the legislators, + under whose cruelty he himself and his fellows were groaning. The plan was proposed to + John Wright and Thomas Winter, who approved it. Faukes was brought over from the Low + Countries, as a man likely to be of much service in such an enterprise. Shortly + afterwards Percy joined them,<sup><a name="FN14A" id="FN14A"></a><a href= + "#FN14">[14]</a></sup> and somewhat later Keyes and Christopher Wright were added to + their number.<sup><a name="FN15A" id="FN15A"></a><a href="#FN15">[15]</a></sup> All the + associates were required to take an oath of secrecy,<sup><a name="FN16A" id= + "FN16A"></a><a href="#FN16">[16]</a></sup> <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id= + "Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span>and to confirm it by receiving Holy Communion.<sup><a name= + "FN17A" id="FN17A"></a><a href="#FN17">[17]</a></sup></p> + + <p>These are the seven "gentlemen of blood and name," as Faukes describes them, who had + the main hand in the operations which we have to study. At a later period six others + were associated with them, Robert Winter, elder brother of Thomas, and Grant, both + gentlemen of property, Bates, Catesby's servant, and finally, Rokewood, Digby, and + Tresham, all rich men, who were brought in chiefly for the sake of their wealth, and + were enlisted when the preparations for the intended explosion had all been completed, + in view of the rising which was to follow.<sup><a name="FN18A" id="FN18A"></a><a href= + "#FN18">[18]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Commencing operations about the middle of December, 1604, these confederates first + endeavoured to dig a mine under the House of Lords, and afterwards <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span>hired a large room, + described as a cellar, situated beneath the Peers' Chamber, and in this stored a + quantity of gunpowder, which Faukes was to fire by a train, while the King, Lords, and + Commons, were assembled above.</p> + + <p>Their enemies being thus destroyed, they did not contemplate a revolution, but were + resolved to get possession of one of the king's sons, or, failing that, of one of his + daughters, whom they would proclaim as sovereign, constituting themselves the guardians + of the new monarch. They also contrived a "hunting match" on Dunsmoor heath, near + Rugby, which was to be in progress when the news of the catastrophe in London should + arrive; the sportsmen assembled for which would furnish, it was hoped, the nucleus of + an army.</p> + + <p>Meanwhile, as we are assured—and this is the crucial point of the whole + story—the government of James I. had no suspicion of what was going on, and, + lulled in false security, were on the verge of destruction, when a lucky circumstance + intervened. On October 26th, ten days before the meeting of Parliament, a Catholic + peer, Lord Monteagle, received an anonymous letter, couched in vague and incoherent + language, warning him to absent himself from the opening ceremony. This document + Monteagle at once took to the king's prime minister, Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, + who promptly divined its meaning and the precise danger indicated, although he allowed + King James to fancy that he was himself the first to interpret it, when it was shown to + him five days later.<sup><a name="FN19A" id="FN19A"></a><a href="#FN19">[19]</a></sup> + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span>Not for four + other days were active steps taken, that is, till the early morning of the fatal Fifth. + Then took place the discovery of which we have already heard.</p> + + <p>Such is, in brief, the accepted version of the history, and of its substantial + correctness there is commonly assumed to be no room for reasonable doubt. As Mr. + Jardine writes,<sup><a name="FN20A" id="FN20A"></a><a href="#FN20">[20]</a></sup> "The + outlines of the transaction were too notorious to be suppressed or disguised; that a + design had been formed to blow up the Parliament House, with the King, the Royal + Family, the Lords and Commons, and that this design was formed by Catholic men and for + Catholic purposes, could never admit of controversy or concealment." In like manner, + while acknowledging that in approaching the question of Father Garnet's complicity, or + that of other priests, we find ourselves upon uncertain ground, Mr. Gardiner has no + hesitation in declaring that "the whole story of the plot, as far as it relates to the + lay conspirators, rests upon indisputable evidence."<sup><a name="FN21A" id= + "FN21A"></a><a href="#FN21">[21]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Nevertheless there appear to be considerations, demanding more attention than they + have hitherto received, which forbid the supposition that, in regard of what is most + vital, this official story can possibly be true; while the extreme care with which it + has obviously been elaborated, suggests the conclusion that it was intended to disguise + facts, to the concealment of which the government of the day attached supreme + importance.</p> + + <p>As has been said, the cardinal point of the tale, as <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span>commonly told, is that the Plot was a secret + and dangerous conspiracy, conducted with so much craft as to have baffled detection, + but for a lucky accident; that the vigilance of the authorities was completely at + fault; and that they found themselves suddenly on the very brink of a terrible + catastrophe of which they had no suspicion.<sup><a name="FN22A" id="FN22A"></a><a href= + "#FN22">[22]</a></sup> If, on the contrary, it should appear that they had ample + information of what was going on, while feigning absolute ignorance; that they + studiously devised a false account of the manner in which it came to their knowledge; + and that their whole conduct is quite inconsistent with that sense of imminent danger + which they so loudly professed—the question inevitably suggests itself as to + whether we can rely upon the authenticity of the opening chapters of a history, the + conclusion of which has been so dexterously manipulated.</p> + + <p>A French writer has observed<sup><a name="FN23A" id="FN23A"></a><a href= + "#FN23">[23]</a></sup> that the plots undertaken under Elizabeth and James I. have this + feature in common, that they proved, one and all, extremely opportune for those against + whom they were directed. To this law the Gunpowder Plot was no exception. Whatever be + the true history of its origin, it certainly placed in the hands of the king's chief + minister a most effective weapon for the enforcement of his favourite <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span>policy, and very materially + strengthened his own position. Without doubt the sensational manner of its "discovery" + largely contributed to its success in this respect; and if this were ingeniously + contrived for such a purpose, may it not be that a like ingenuity had been employed in + providing the material destined to be so artistically utilized?</p> + + <p>There can be no question as to the wide prevalence of the belief that previous plots + had owed their origin to the policy of the statesmen who finally detected them, a + belief witnessed to by Lord Castlemaine,<sup><a name="FN24A" id="FN24A"></a><a href= + "#FN24">[24]</a></sup> who declares that "it was a piece of wit in Queen Elizabeth's + days to draw men into such devices," and that "making and fomenting plots was then in + fashion; nor can it be denied that good grounds for such an opinion were not lacking". + The unfortunate man Squires had been executed on the ridiculous charge that he had come + over from Spain in order to poison the pommel of Queen Elizabeth's saddle. Dr. Parry, + we are informed by Bishop Goodman, whose verdict is endorsed by Mr. + Brewer,<sup><a name="FN25A" id="FN25A"></a><a href="#FN25">[25]</a></sup> was put to + death by those who knew him to be guiltless in their regard, they having themselves + employed him in the business for which he suffered. Concerning Babington's famous plot, + it is absolutely certain that, whatever its origin, it was, almost from the first, + fully known to Walsingham, through whose hands passed the correspondence between the + conspirators, and who assiduously worked the enterprise, in order to turn it to the + destruction of the Queen of Scots. As to Lopez, the Jewish physician, it is impossible + not to concur in the verdict <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg + 15]</a></span>that his condemnation was at least as much owing to political intrigue as + to the weight of evidence.<sup><a name="FN26A" id="FN26A"></a><a href= + "#FN26">[26]</a></sup> Concerning this period Mr. Brewer says: "The Roman Catholics + seem to have made just complaints of the subtle and unworthy artifices of Leicester and + Walsingham, by whom they were entrapped into the guilt of high treason. 'And verily,' + as [Camden] expresses it, there were at this time crafty ways devised to try how men + stood affected; counterfeit letters were sent in the name of the Queen of Scots and + left at papists' houses; spies were sent up and down the country to note people's + dispositions and lay hold of their words; and reporters of vain and idle stories were + credited and encouraged."<sup><a name="FN27A" id="FN27A"></a><a href= + "#FN27">[27]</a></sup> Under King James,<sup><a name="FN28A" id="FN28A"></a><a href= + "#FN28">[28]</a></sup> as Bishop Goodman declares, the priest Watson was hanged for + treason by those who had employed him.<sup><a name="FN29A" id="FN29A"></a><a href= + "#FN29">[29]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It must farther be observed that the particular Plot which is our subject was + stamped with certain features more than commonly suspicious. Even on the face of + things, as will be seen from the summary already given, it was steadily utilized from + the first for a purpose <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg + 16]</a></span>which it could not legitimately be made to serve. That the Catholics of + England, as a body, had any connection with it there is not, nor ever appeared to be, + any vestige of a proof; still less that the official superiors of the Church, including + the Pope himself, were concerned in it. Yet the first act of the government was to lay + it at the door of all these, thus investing it with a character which was, indeed, + eminently fitted to sustain their own policy, but to which it was no-wise entitled. + Even in regard of Father Garnet and his fellow Jesuits, whatever judgment may now be + formed concerning them, it is clear that it was determined to connect them with the + conspiracy long before any evidence at all was forthcoming to sustain the charge. The + actual confederates were, in fact, treated throughout as in themselves of little or no + account, and as important only in so far as they might consent to incriminate those + whom the authorities wished to be incriminated.</p> + + <p>The determined manner in which this object was ever kept in view, the unscrupulous + means constantly employed for its attainment, the vehemence with which matters were + asserted to have been proved, any proof of which was never even seriously + attempted—in a word, the elaborate system of falsification by which alone the + story of the conspiracy was made to suit the purpose it so effectually served, can + inspire us with no confidence that the foundation upon which such a superstructure was + erected, was itself what it was said to be.</p> + + <p>On the other hand, when we examine into the details supplied to us as to the + progress of the affair, we find that much of what the conspirators are said + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span>to have done is + well-nigh incredible, while it is utterly impossible that if they really acted in the + manner described, the public authorities should not have had full knowledge of their + proceedings. We also find not only that the same authorities, while feigning ignorance + of anything of the kind, were perfectly well aware that these very conspirators had + something in hand, but that long before the "discovery," in fact, at the very time when + the conspiracy is said to have been hatched, their officials were working a Catholic + plot, by means of secret agents, and even making arrangements as to who were to be + implicated therein.</p> + + <p>These are, in brief, some of the considerations which point to a conclusion utterly + at variance with the received version of the story, the conclusion, namely, that, for + purposes of State, the government of the day either found means to instigate the + conspirators to undertake their enterprise, or, at least, being, from an early stage of + the undertaking, fully aware of what was going on, sedulously nursed the insane scheme + till the time came to make capital out of it. That the conspirators, or the greater + number of them, really meant to strike a great blow is not to be denied, though it may + be less easy to assure ourselves as to its precise character; and their guilt will not + be palliated should it appear that, in projecting an atrocious crime, they were + unwittingly playing the game of plotters more astute than themselves. At the same time, + while fully endorsing the sentiment of a Catholic writer,<sup><a name="FN30A" id= + "FN30A"></a><a href="#FN30">[30]</a></sup> that they who suffer themselves to be drawn + into a plot like fools, deserve to be hanged for it like <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span>knaves, it is impossible not to agree with + another when he writes:<sup><a name="FN31A" id="FN31A"></a><a href= + "#FN31">[31]</a></sup> "This account does not excuse the conspirators, but lays a heavy + weight upon the devils who tempted them beyond their strength."</p> + + <p>The view thus set forth will perhaps be considered unworthy of serious discussion, + and it must be fully admitted, that there can be no excuse for making charges such as + it involves, unless solid grounds can be alleged for so doing. That any such grounds + are to be found historians of good repute utterly deny. Mr. Hallam roundly + declares:<sup><a name="FN32A" id="FN32A"></a><a href="#FN32">[32]</a></sup> "To deny + that there was such a plot, or, which is the same thing, to throw the whole on the + contrivance and management of Cecil, as has sometimes been done, argues great + effrontery in those who lead, and great stupidity in those who follow." Similarly, Mr. + Gardiner,<sup><a name="FN33A" id="FN33A"></a><a href="#FN33">[33]</a></sup> while + allowing that contemporaries accused Cecil of inventing the Plot, is content to dismiss + such a charge as "absurd."</p> + + <p>Whether it be so or not we have now to inquire.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN3" id="FN3"></a><a href="#FN3A">[3]</a></sup> So he + himself always wrote it.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN4" id="FN4"></a><a href="#FN4A">[4]</a></sup> Also + described as "Great Horses," or "Horses for the great Saddle."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN5" id="FN5"></a><a href="#FN5A">[5]</a></sup> "The + great object of the Government now was to obtain evidence against the + priests."—<span class="smcap">Gardiner</span>, <i>History of England</i>, i. + 267. Ed. 1883.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN6" id="FN6"></a><a href="#FN6A">[6]</a></sup> See his + despatch in reply. <i>Irish State Papers</i>, vol. 217, 95. Cornwallis received + Cecil's letter on November 22nd.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN7" id="FN7"></a><a href="#FN7A">[7]</a></sup> See + Harington's account of the king's message, <i>Nugæ Antiquæ</i>, i. + 374.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN8" id="FN8"></a><a href="#FN8A">[8]</a></sup> To Favat. + (Copy) Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. 6178, fol. 625.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN9" id="FN9"></a><a href="#FN9A">[9]</a></sup> Statutes: + Anno 3<sup>o</sup> Jacobi, c. 1.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN10" id="FN10"></a><a href="#FN10A">[10]</a></sup> This + work was taken in hand by the Commons, when, in spite of the alarming circumstances + of the time, they met on November 5th, and was carried on at every subsequent + sitting. The Lords also met on the 5th, but transacted no business. <i>Journals of + Parliament.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN11" id="FN11"></a><a href="#FN11A">[11]</a></sup> + Tresham had died in the Tower, December 22nd. Although he had not been tried, his + remains were treated as those of a traitor, his head being cut off and fixed above + the gates of Northampton (<i>Dom. James I.</i> xvii. 62.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN12" id="FN12"></a><a href="#FN12A">[12]</a></sup> "That + which remaineth is but this, to assure you that ere many daies you shall hear that + Father Garnet ... is layd open for a principall conspirator even in the particular + Treason of the Powder."—<i>To Sir Henry Bruncard, P.R.O. Ireland</i>, vol. 218, + March 3rd, 1605-6. Also (Calendar) <i>Dom. James I.</i> xix. 10.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN13" id="FN13"></a><a href="#FN13A">[13]</a></sup> In + Lent, 1603-4. Easter fell that year on April 8th.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN14" id="FN14"></a><a href="#FN14A">[14]</a></sup> + "About the middle of Easter Term."—<i>Thomas Winter's declaration</i>, of + November 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN15" id="FN15"></a><a href="#FN15A">[15]</a></sup> + "Keyes, about a month before Michaelmas."—<i>Ibid.</i> About Christopher Wright + there is much confusion, Faukes (November 17th, 1605) implying that he was introduced + before Christmas, and Thomas Winter (November 23rd, 1605) that it was about a + fortnight after the following Candlemas, <i>i.e.</i>, about the middle of + February.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN16" id="FN16"></a><a href="#FN16A">[16]</a></sup> The + form of this oath is thus given in the official account: "You shall swear by the + blessed Trinity, and by the Sacrament you now propose to receive, never to disclose + directly or indirectly, by word or circumstance, the matter that shall be proposed to + you to keep secret, nor desist from the execution thereof until the rest shall give + you leave." It is a singular circumstance that the form of this oath, which was + repeated in official publications, with an emphasis itself inexplicable, occurs in + only one of the conspirators' confessions, viz., the oft-quoted declaration of T. + Winter, November 23rd, 1605. This—as we shall see, a most suspicious + document—was one of the two selected for publication, on which the traditional + history of the plot depends. Curiously enough, however, the oath, with sundry other + matters, was omitted from the published version of the confession.</p> + + <p>[Published in the "King's Book:" copy, or draft, for publication, in the Record + Office: original at Hatfield. Copy of original Brit. Mus. Add. MSS., 6178, 75.]</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN17" id="FN17"></a><a href="#FN17A">[17]</a></sup> T. + Winter says: "Having upon a primer given each other the oath of secrecy, in a chamber + where no other body was, we went after into the next room and heard mass, and + received the blessed Sacrament upon the same."—<i>Declaration</i>, November + 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN18" id="FN18"></a><a href="#FN18A">[18]</a></sup> Digby + was enlisted "about Michaelmas, 1605;" Rokewood about a month before the 5th of + November. Tresham gives October 14th as the date of his own initiation. + <i>Examination</i>, November 13th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN19" id="FN19"></a><a href="#FN19A">[19]</a></sup> This + is clear from a comparison of Cecil's private letter to Cornwallis and others + (Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 170), with the official account published in the + <i>Discourse of the manner of the Discovery of the Gunpowder Plot</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN20" id="FN20"></a><a href="#FN20A">[20]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 3.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN21" id="FN21"></a><a href="#FN21A">[21]</a></sup> + <i>History of England</i>, i. 269 (1883).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN22" id="FN22"></a><a href="#FN22A">[22]</a></sup> "We + had all been blowne up at a clapp, if God out of His Mercie and just Reuenge against + so great an Abomination, had not destined it to be discovered, though very + miraculously, even some twelve Houres before the matter should have been put in + execution."—<i>Cecil to Cornwallis</i>, November 9th, 1605. Winwood, + <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 170.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN23" id="FN23"></a><a href="#FN23A">[23]</a></sup> M. + l'Abbé Destombes, <i>La persécution en Angleterre sous le règne + d'Elizabeth</i>, p. 176.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN24" id="FN24"></a><a href="#FN24A">[24]</a></sup> + <i>Catholique Apology</i>, third edition, p. 403.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN25" id="FN25"></a><a href="#FN25A">[25]</a></sup> + Goodman's <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 121.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN26" id="FN26"></a><a href="#FN26A">[26]</a></sup> Mr. + Sidney Lee, <i>Dictionary of National Biography</i>, <i>sub nom.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN27" id="FN27"></a><a href="#FN27A">[27]</a></sup> + Goodman's <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 121. Ed. J.S. Brewer.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN28" id="FN28"></a><a href="#FN28A">[28]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, p. 64.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN29" id="FN29"></a><a href="#FN29A">[29]</a></sup> Of + this affair,—the "Bye" and the "Main,"—Goodman says, "[This] I did ever + think to be an old relic of the treasons in Q. Elizabeth's time, and that George + Brooks was the contriver thereof, who being brother-in-law to the Secretary, and + having great wit, small means, and a vast expense, did only try men's allegiance, and + had an intent to betray one another, but were all taken napping and so involved in + one net. This in effect appears by Brooks' confession; and certainly K. James ... had + no opinion of that treason, and therefore was pleased to pardon all save only Brooks + and the priests."—<i>Court of King James</i>, i. 160.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN30" id="FN30"></a><a href="#FN30A">[30]</a></sup> <i>A + plain and rational account of the Catholick Faith</i>, etc. Rouen, 1721, p. 200.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN31" id="FN31"></a><a href="#FN31A">[31]</a></sup> Dodd, + <i>Church History of England</i>, Brussels, 1739, i. 334.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN32" id="FN32"></a><a href="#FN32A">[32]</a></sup> + <i>Constitutional History</i>, i. 406, note, Seventh Edition. In the same note the + historian, discussing the case of Father Garnet, speaks of "the damning circumstance + that he was taken at Hendlip in concealment along with the other conspirators." He + who wrote thus can have had but a slight acquaintance with the details of the + history. None of the conspirators, except Robert Winter, who was captured at Hagley + Hall, were taken in concealment, and none at Hendlip, where there is no reason to + suppose they ever were. Father Garnet was discovered there, nearly three months + later, in company with another Jesuit, Father Oldcorne, on the very day when the + conspirators were executed in London, and it was never alleged that he had ever, upon + any occasion, been seen in company with "the other conspirators."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN33" id="FN33"></a><a href="#FN33A">[33]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 255, note.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II.</h2> + + <h3>THE PERSONS CONCERNED.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">At</span> the period with which we have to deal the + chief minister of James I. was Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury,<sup><a name="FN34A" id= + "FN34A"></a><a href="#FN34">[34]</a></sup> the political heir of his father, William + Cecil, Lord Burghley,<sup><a name="FN35A" id="FN35A"></a><a href="#FN35">[35]</a></sup> + and of Walsingham, his predecessor in the office of secretary. It is clear that he had + inherited from them ideas of statesmanship of the order then in vogue, and from nature, + the kind of ability required to put these successfully in practice. Sir Robert Naunton + thus describes him:<sup><a name="FN36A" id="FN36A"></a><a href= + "#FN36">[36]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"This great minister of state, and the staff of the Queen's declining age, though + his little crooked person<sup><a name="FN37A" id="FN37A"></a><a href= + "#FN37">[37]</a></sup> could not provide any great supportation, yet <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span>it carried thereon a head + and a headpiece of vast content, and therein, it seems, nature was so diligent to + complete one, and the best, part about him, as that to the perfection of his memory and + intellectuals, she took care also of his senses, and to put him in <i>Lynceos + oculos</i>, or to pleasure him the more, borrowed of Argus, so to give him a perfective + sight. And for the rest of his sensitive virtues, his predecessor had left him a + receipt, to smell out what was done in the Conclave; and his good old father was so + well seen in the mathematicks, as that he could tell you throughout Spain, every part, + every ship, with their burthens, whither bound, what preparation, what impediments for + diversion of enterprises, counsels, and resolutions." The writer then proceeds to give + a striking instance to show "how docible was this little man."</p> + + <p>Of his character, as estimated by competent judges, his contemporaries, we have very + different accounts. Mr. Gardiner, who may fairly be chosen to represent his apologists, + speaks thus:<sup><a name="FN38A" id="FN38A"></a><a href="#FN38">[38]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"Although there are circumstances in his life which tell against him, it is + difficult to read the whole of the letters and documents which have come down to us + from his pen, without becoming gradually convinced of his honesty of intention. It + cannot be denied that he was satisfied with the ordinary morality of his <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span>time, and that he thought it + no shame to keep a State secret or to discover a plot by means of a falsehood. If he + grasped at power as one who took pleasure in the exercise of it, he used it for what he + regarded as the true interests of his king and country. Nor are we left to his own acts + and words as the only means by which we are enabled to form a judgment of his + character. Of all the statesmen of the day, not one has left a more blameless character + than the Earl of Dorset. Dorset took the opportunity of leaving upon record in his + will, which would not be read till he had no longer injury or favour to expect in this + world, the very high admiration in which his colleague was held by him."</p> + + <p>This, it must be allowed, is a somewhat facile species of argument. Though wills are + not formally opened until after the testators' deaths, it is not impossible for their + contents to be previously communicated to others, when there is an object for so + doing.<sup><a name="FN39A" id="FN39A"></a><a href="#FN39">[39]</a></sup> But, however + this may be, it can scarcely be said that the weight of evidence tends in this + direction. Not to mention the fact that, while enjoying the entire confidence of Queen + Elizabeth, Cecil was engaged in a secret correspondence with King James, which she + would have regarded as treasonable—and which he so carefully concealed that for a + century afterwards and more it was not suspected—there remains the other + indubitable fact, that while similarly trusted by James, and while all affairs of State + were entirely in his hands, he was in receipt of a secret pension from the King of + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg + 22]</a></span>Spain,<sup><a name="FN40A" id="FN40A"></a><a href="#FN40">[40]</a></sup> + the very monarch any communication with whom he treated as treason on the part of + others.<sup><a name="FN41A" id="FN41A"></a><a href="#FN41">[41]</a></sup> It is certain + that the Earl of Essex, when on his trial, asserted that Cecil had declared the Spanish + Infanta to be the rightful heir to the crown, and though the secretary vehemently + denied the imputation, he equally repudiated the notion that he favoured the King of + Scots.<sup><a name="FN42A" id="FN42A"></a><a href="#FN42">[42]</a></sup> We know, + moreover, that one who as Spanish Ambassador had dealings with him, pronounced him to + be a venal traitor, who was ready to sell his soul for money,<sup><a name="FN43A" id= + "FN43A"></a><a href="#FN43">[43]</a></sup> while another intimated<sup><a name="FN44A" + id="FN44A"></a><a href="#FN44">[44]</a></sup> that <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span>it was in his power to have charged him with + "unwarrantable practices." Similarly, we hear from the French minister of the ingrained + habit of falsehood which made it impossible for the English secretary to speak the + truth even to friends;<sup><a name="FN45A" id="FN45A"></a><a href= + "#FN45">[45]</a></sup> and, from the French Ambassador, of the resolution imputed to + the same statesman, to remove from his path every rival who seemed likely to jeopardize + his tenure of power.<sup><a name="FN46A" id="FN46A"></a><a href= + "#FN46">[46]</a></sup></p> + + <p>What was the opinion of his own countrymen, appeared with startling emphasis when, + in 1612, the Earl died. On May 22nd we find the Earl of Northampton writing to + Rochester that the "little man" is dead, "for which so many rejoice, and so few even + seem to be sorry."<sup><a name="FN47A" id="FN47A"></a><a href="#FN47">[47]</a></sup> + Five days later, Chamberlain, writing<sup><a name="FN48A" id="FN48A"></a><a href= + "#FN48">[48]</a></sup> to his friend Dudley Carleton, to announce the same event, thus + expresses himself: "As the case stands it was best that he gave over the world, for + they say his friends fell from him apace, and some near about him, and however he had + fared <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span>with his + health, it is verily thought he would never have been himself again in power and + credit. I never knew so great a man so soon and so openly censured, for men's tongues + walk very liberally and freely, but how truly I cannot judge." On June 25th he again + reports: "The outrageous speeches against the deceased Lord continue still, and there + be fresh libels come out every day, and I doubt his actions will be hardly censured in + the next parliament, if the King be not the more gracious to repress them." Moreover, + his funeral was attended by few or none of the gentry, and those only were present + whose official position compelled them. His own opinion Chamberlain expresses in two + epigrams and an anagram, which, although of small literary merit, contrive clearly to + express the most undisguised animosity and contempt for the late minister.<sup><a name= + "FN49A" id="FN49A"></a><a href="#FN49">[49]</a></sup></p> + + <p>There is abundant proof that such sentiments were not first entertained when he had + passed away, though, naturally, they were less openly expressed when he was alive and + practically all powerful. Cecil seems, in fact, to have been throughout his career a + lonely man, with <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg + 25]</a></span>no real friends and many enemies, desperately fighting for his own hand, + and for the retention of that power which he prized above all else, aspiring, as a + contemporary satirist puts it, to be "both shepherd and dog."<sup><a name="FN50A" id= + "FN50A"></a><a href="#FN50">[50]</a></sup> Since the accession of James he had felt his + tenure of office to be insecure. Goodman tells us<sup><a name="FN51A" id= + "FN51A"></a><a href="#FN51">[51]</a></sup> that "it is certain the king did not love + him;" Osborne,<sup><a name="FN52A" id="FN52A"></a><a href="#FN52">[52]</a></sup> "that + he had forfeited the love of the people by the hate he expressed to their darling + Essex, and the desire he had to render justice and prerogative arbitrary."<sup><a name= + "FN53A" id="FN53A"></a><a href="#FN53">[53]</a></sup> Sir Anthony Weldon speaks of + him<sup><a name="FN54A" id="FN54A"></a><a href="#FN54">[54]</a></sup> as <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span>"Sir Robert Cecil, a very + wise man, but much hated in England by reason of the fresh bleeding of that universally + beloved Earl of Essex, and for that clouded also in the king's favour." De la Boderie, + the French Ambassador, tells us<sup><a name="FN55A" id="FN55A"></a><a href= + "#FN55">[55]</a></sup> that the nobility were exceedingly jealous of his dignity and + power, and<sup><a name="FN56A" id="FN56A"></a><a href="#FN56">[56]</a></sup> that he in + his turn was jealous of the growing influence of Prince Henry, the heir apparent, who + made no secret of his dislike of him. Meanwhile there were rivals who, it seemed not + improbable, might supplant him. One of these, Sir Walter Raleigh, had already been + rendered harmless on account of his connection with the "Main," the mysterious + conspiracy which inaugurated the reign of James. There remained the Earl of + Northumberland, and it may be remarked in passing that one of the effects of the + Gunpowder Plot was to dispose of him likewise.<sup><a name="FN57A" id= + "FN57A"></a><a href="#FN57">[57]</a></sup> Even the apologists of the <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span>minister do not attempt to + deny either the fact that he was accustomed to work by stratagems and disguises, nor + the obloquy that followed on his death;<sup><a name="FN58A" id="FN58A"></a><a href= + "#FN58">[58]</a></sup> while by friends and foes alike he was compared to Ulysses of + many wiles.<sup><a name="FN59A" id="FN59A"></a><a href="#FN59">[59]</a></sup></p> + + <p>But amongst those whom he had to dread, there can be no doubt that the members of + the Catholic <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg + 28]</a></span>party appeared to the secretary the most formidable. It was known on all + hands, nor did he attempt to disguise the fact, that he was the irreconcilable opponent + of any remission of the penal laws enacted for the purpose of stamping out the old + faith.<sup><a name="FN60A" id="FN60A"></a><a href="#FN60">[60]</a></sup> The work, + however, had as yet been very incompletely done. At the beginning of the reign of King + James, the Catholics formed at least a half, probably a majority,<sup><a name="FN61A" + id="FN61A"></a><a href="#FN61">[61]</a></sup> of the English people. There were amongst + them many noblemen, fitted to hold offices of State. Moreover, the king, who before his + accession had unquestionably <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg + 29]</a></span>assured the Catholics at least of toleration,<sup><a name="FN62A" id= + "FN62A"></a><a href="#FN62">[62]</a></sup> showed at his first coming a manifest + disposition to relieve them from the grievous persecution under which they had groaned + so long.<sup><a name="FN63A" id="FN63A"></a><a href="#FN63">[63]</a></sup> He remitted + a large part of the fines which had so grievously pressed upon all recusants, declaring + that he would not make merchandise of conscience, nor set a price upon + faith;<sup><a name="FN64A" id="FN64A"></a><a href="#FN64">[64]</a></sup> he invited to + his presence leading Catholics from various parts of the country, assuring them, and + bidding them assure their co-religionists, of his gracious intentions in their + regard;<sup><a name="FN65A" id="FN65A"></a><a href="#FN65">[65]</a></sup> titles of + honour and lucrative employments were bestowed on some of their number;<sup><a name= + "FN66A" id="FN66A"></a><a href="#FN66">[66]</a></sup> one professed Catholic, Henry + Howard, presently created Earl of Northampton, being enrolled in the Privy Council; and + in the first speech which he addressed to his Parliament James declared that, as to the + papists, he had no desire to persecute them, especially those of the laity who would be + quiet.<sup><a name="FN67A" id="FN67A"></a><a href="#FN67">[67]</a></sup> The immediate + effect <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span>of this + milder policy was to afford evidence of the real strength of the Catholics, many now + openly declaring themselves who had previously conformed to the State church. In the + diocese of Chester alone the number of Catholics was increased by a + thousand.<sup><a name="FN68A" id="FN68A"></a><a href="#FN68">[68]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It is scarcely to be wondered at that men who were familiar with the political + methods of the age should see in all this a motive sufficient to explain a great stroke + for the destruction of those who appeared to be so formidable, devised by such a + minister as was then in power, "the statesman," writes Lord Castlemaine,<sup><a name= + "FN69A" id="FN69A"></a><a href="#FN69">[69]</a></sup> "who bore (as everybody knew) a + particular hatred to all of our profession, and this increased to hear his Majesty + speak a little in his first speech to the two Houses against persecution of papists, + whereas there had been nothing within those walls but invectives and defamations for + above forty years together."</p> + + <p>This much is certain, that, whatever its origin, the Gunpowder Plot immensely + increased Cecil's influence and power, and, for a time, even his popularity, assuring + the success of that anti-Catholic policy with which he was identified.<sup><a name= + "FN70A" id="FN70A"></a><a href="#FN70">[70]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span></p> + + <p>Of no less importance is it to understand the position of the Catholic body, and the + character of the particular Catholics who engaged in this enterprise. We have seen with + what hopes the advent of King James had been hailed by those who had suffered so much + for his mother's sake, and who interpreted in a too sanguine and trustful spirit his + own words and deeds. Their dream of enjoying even toleration at his hands was soon + rudely dispelled. After giving them the briefest of respites, the monarch, under the + influence, as all believed, of his council, and especially of his chief + minister,<sup><a name="FN71A" id="FN71A"></a><a href="#FN71">[71]</a></sup> suddenly + reversed his line of action and persecuted his Catholic subjects more cruelly than had + his predecessor, calling up the arrears of fines which they fancied had been altogether + remitted, ruining many in the process who had hitherto contrived to pay their + way,<sup><a name="FN72A" id="FN72A"></a><a href="#FN72">[72]</a></sup> and adding to + the sense of injury which such <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg + 32]</a></span>a course necessarily provoked by farming out wealthy recusants to needy + courtiers, "to make their profit of," in particular to the Scots who had followed their + royal master across the border. Soon it was announced that the king would have blood; + all priests were ordered to leave the realm under pain of death, and the searches for + them became more frequent and violent than ever. In no long time, as Goodman tells + us,<sup><a name="FN73A" id="FN73A"></a><a href="#FN73">[73]</a></sup> "a gentlewoman + was hanged only for relieving and harbouring a priest; a citizen was hanged only for + being reconciled to the Church of Rome; besides the penal laws were such and so + executed that they could not subsist." Father Gerard says:<sup><a name="FN74A" id= + "FN74A"></a><a href="#FN74">[74]</a></sup> "This being known to Catholics, it is easy + to be seen how first their hopes were turned into fears, and then their fears into full + knowledge that all the contrary to that they had hoped was intended and prepared for + them", and, as one of the victims of these proceedings wrote, "the times of Elizabeth, + although most cruel, were the mildest and happiest in comparison with those of King + James."<sup><a name="FN75A" id="FN75A"></a><a href="#FN75">[75]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In such circumstances, the Catholic body being so numerous as it was, it is not to + be wondered at that individuals should be found, who, smarting under their injuries, + and indignant at the bad faith of which they considered themselves the dupes, looked to + violent remedies for relief, and might without difficulty be worked upon to that + effect. Their case seemed far more hopeless than ever. Queen Elizabeth's quarrel with + Rome had been in a great degree personal; and moreover, as she had no direct heir, it + was confidently <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg + 33]</a></span>anticipated that the demise of the crown would introduce a new era. King + James's proceedings, on the other hand, seemed to indicate a deliberate policy which + there was no prospect of reversing, especially as his eldest son, should he prove true + to his promise, might be expected to do that zealously, and of himself, which his + father was held to do under the constraint of others.<sup><a name="FN76A" id= + "FN76A"></a><a href="#FN76">[76]</a></sup> As Sir Everard Digby warned Cecil, in the + remarkable letter which he addressed to him on the subject:<sup><a name="FN77A" id= + "FN77A"></a><a href="#FN77">[77]</a></sup> "If your Lordship and the State think fit to + deal severely with the Catholics, within brief space there will be massacres, + rebellions, and desperate attempts against the King and the State. For it is a general + received reason among Catholics, that there is not that expecting and suffering course + now to be run that was in the Queen's time, who was the last of her line, and last in + expectance to run violent courses against Catholics; for then it was hoped that the + King that now is, would have been at least free from persecuting, as his promise was + before his coming into this realm, and as divers his promises have been since his + coming. All these promises every man sees broken."<sup><a name="FN78A" id= + "FN78A"></a><a href="#FN78">[78]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It must likewise be remembered that if stratagems and "practices" were the + recognized weapons of ministers, turbulence and arms were, at this period, the + familiar, and indeed the only, resource of those in <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span>opposition, nor did any stigma attach to their + employment unless taken up on the losing side. Not a little of this kind of thing had + been done on behalf of James himself. As is well known, he succeeded to the throne by a + title upon which he could not have recovered at law an acre of land.<sup><a name= + "FN79A" id="FN79A"></a><a href="#FN79">[79]</a></sup> Elizabeth had so absolutely + forbidden all discussion of the question of the succession as to leave it in a state of + utter confusion.<sup><a name="FN80A" id="FN80A"></a><a href="#FN80">[80]</a></sup> + There were more than a dozen possible competitors, and amongst these the claim of the + King of Scots was technically not the strongest, for though nearest in blood his claims + had been barred by a special Act of Parliament, excluding the Scottish line. As + Professor Thorold Rogers says, "For a year after his accession James, if Acts of + Parliament are to go for anything, was not legally King."<sup><a name="FN81A" id= + "FN81A"></a><a href="#FN81">[81]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Nevertheless the cause of James was vigorously taken up in all directions, and + promoted by means which might well have been styled treason against the authority of + Parliament. Thus, old Sir Thomas Tresham, father of Francis Tresham, the Gunpowder + Conspirator, who had been an eminent sufferer for his religion, at considerable + personal risk, and against much resistance on the part of the local magistrates and the + populace, publicly proclaimed the new king at Northampton, while Francis Tresham + himself and his brother Lewis, with Lord Monteagle, their brother-in-law, supported the + Earl of Southampton in holding the Tower of London on his behalf.<sup><a name="FN82A" + id="FN82A"></a><a href="#FN82">[82]</a></sup> In London indeed <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span>everybody took to arms as + soon as the queen's illness had been known; watch and ward were kept in the City; rich + men brought their plate and treasure from the country, and placed them where they would + be safest,<sup><a name="FN83A" id="FN83A"></a><a href="#FN83">[83]</a></sup> and the + approaches were guarded. Cecil himself related in open court, in praise of the + Londoners, how, when he himself, attended by most of the peers and privy councillors of + the kingdom, wished to enter the City to proclaim the new sovereign, they found the + gates closed against them till they had publicly declared that they were about to + proclaim James and no one else.<sup><a name="FN84A" id="FN84A"></a><a href= + "#FN84">[84]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In times when statesmen could approve such methods of political action, it was + inevitable that violent enterprises should have come to be considered the natural + resource of those out of power, and it is very clear that there were numerous + individuals, of whom no one party had the monopoly, who were ready at any moment to + risk everything for the cause they served, and such men, although their proclivities + were well known, did not suffer much in public esteem.</p> + + <p>The Gunpowder Conspirators were eminently men of this stamp, and notoriously so. So + well was their character known, that when, in 1596, eight years before the commencement + of the Plot, Queen Elizabeth had been unwell, the Lords of the Council, as a + precautionary measure arrested some of the principal amongst them, Catesby, the two + Wrights, Tresham, and others, as being persons who would certainly give <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span>trouble should a chance + occur.<sup><a name="FN85A" id="FN85A"></a><a href="#FN85">[85]</a></sup> Since that + time they had not improved their record. All those above-named, as well as Thomas + Winter, Christopher Wright, Percy, Grant, and perhaps others, had been engaged in the + ill-starred rebellion of Essex, on which occasion Catesby was wounded, and both he and + Tresham came remarkably near being hanged.<sup><a name="FN86A" id="FN86A"></a><a href= + "#FN86">[86]</a></sup> They had likewise been variously implicated in all the seditious + attempts which had since been made—Catesby and Tresham being named by Sir Edward + Coke as being engaged with Watson in the "Bye." Thomas Winter, Christopher Wright, and + Faukes, had, if we may believe the same authority, been sent to Spain on treasonable + embassies.<sup><a name="FN87A" id="FN87A"></a><a href="#FN87">[87]</a></sup> Grant made + himself very conspicuous by frequently resisting the officers of the law <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>when they appeared to search + his house.<sup><a name="FN88A" id="FN88A"></a><a href="#FN88">[88]</a></sup> John + Wright and Percy had, at least till a very recent period, been notorious bravoes, who + made a point of picking a quarrel with any man who was reported to be a good swordsman, + they being both expert with the weapon.<sup><a name="FN89A" id="FN89A"></a><a href= + "#FN89">[89]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It is evident that men of this stamp were not unlikely to prove restive under such + treatment as was meted out to the Catholics, from which moreover, as gentlemen, they + themselves suffered in a special degree. Lord Castlemaine remarks that loose people may + usually be drawn into a plot when statesmen lay gins, and that it was no hard thing for + a Secretary of State, should he desire any such thing, to know of turbulent and + ambitious spirits to be his unconscious instruments,<sup><a name="FN90A" id= + "FN90A"></a><a href="#FN90">[90]</a></sup> and it is obvious that no great perspicacity + would have been required to fix upon those who had given such evidence of their + disposition as had these men.</p> + + <p>It must, at the same time, be confessed that the character of the plotters is one of + the most perplexing features of the Plot. The crime contemplated was without parallel + in its brutal and senseless atrocity. There had, it is true, been powder-plots before, + notably that which had effected the destruction of the king's own father, Lord Darnley, + a fact undoubtedly calculated <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg + 38]</a></span>to make much impression upon the timorous mind of James. But what marked + off our Gunpowder Plot from all others, was the wholesale and indiscriminate slaughter + in which it must have resulted, and the absence of any possibility that the cause could + be benefited which the conspirators had at heart. It was at once reprobated and + denounced by the Catholics of England, and by the friends and near relatives of the + conspirators themselves.<sup><a name="FN91A" id="FN91A"></a><a href= + "#FN91">[91]</a></sup> It might be supposed that those who undertook such an enterprise + were criminals of the deepest dye, and ruffians of a more than usually repulsive type. + In spite, however, of the turbulent element in their character of which we have seen + something, such a judgment would, in the opinion of historians, be altogether + erroneous. Far from their being utterly unredeemed villains, it appears, in fact, that + apart from the one monstrous transgression which has made them infamous, they should be + distinguished in the annals of crime as the least disreputable gang of conspirators who + ever plotted a treason. On this point we have ample evidence from those who are by no + means their friends. "Atrocious as their whole undertaking was," writes Mr. + Gardiner,<sup><a name="FN92A" id="FN92A"></a><a href="#FN92">[92]</a></sup> "great as + must have been the moral obliquity of their minds before they could have conceived such + a project, there was at least nothing mean or selfish about them. They boldly risked + their lives for what they honestly <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id= + "Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span>believed to be the cause of God and of their country. + Theirs was a crime which it would never have entered into the heart of any man to + commit who was not raised above the low aims of the ordinary criminal." Similarly Mr. + Jardine, a still less friendly witness, tells us<sup><a name="FN93A" id= + "FN93A"></a><a href="#FN93">[93]</a></sup> that "several at least of the conspirators + were men of mild and amiable manners, averse to tumults and bloodshed, and dwelling + quietly amidst the humanities of domestic life," a description which he applies + especially to Rokewood and Digby; while of Guy Faukes himself he says<sup><a name= + "FN94A" id="FN94A"></a><a href="#FN94">[94]</a></sup> that, according to the accounts + which we hear of him, he is not to be regarded as a mercenary ruffian, ready for hire + to do any deed of blood; but as a zealot, misled by misguided fanaticism, who was, + however, by no means destitute either of piety or of humanity. Moreover, as Mr. Jardine + farther remarks, the conspirators as a body were of the class which we should least + expect to find engaged in desperate enterprises, being, as Sir E. Coke described them, + "gentlemen of good houses, of excellent parts, and of very competent fortunes and + estates," none of them, except perhaps Catesby, being in pecuniary difficulties, while + several—notably Robert Winter, Rokewood, Digby, Tresham, and Grant—were men + of large possessions. It has also been observed by a recent biographer of Sir Everard + Digby,<sup><a name="FN95A" id="FN95A"></a><a href="#FN95">[95]</a></sup> that, for the + furtherance of their projects after the explosion, the confederates were able to + provide a sum equal at least to £75,000 of our money—a sufficient proof of + their worldly position.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span></p> + + <p>That men of such a class should so lightly and easily have adopted a scheme so + desperate and atrocious as that of "murdering a kingdom in its representatives," is + undoubtedly not the least incomprehensible feature of this strange story. At the same + time it must not be forgotten that there is another, and a very different account of + these men, which comes to us on the authority of a Catholic priest living in England at + the time,<sup><a name="FN96A" id="FN96A"></a><a href="#FN96">[96]</a></sup> who speaks + of the conspirators as follows:</p> + + <p>"They were a few wicked and desperate wretches, whom many Protestants termed + Papists, although the priests and the true Catholics knew them not to be such.... They + were never frequenters of Catholic Sacraments with any priest, as I could ever learn; + and, as all the Protestant Courts will witness, not one of them was a convicted or + known Catholic or Recusant."<sup><a name="FN97A" id="FN97A"></a><a href= + "#FN97">[97]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Similarly Cornwallis, writing from Madrid,<sup><a name="FN98A" id= + "FN98A"></a><a href="#FN98">[98]</a></sup> reported that the king and Estate of Spain + were "much grieved that they being atheists and devils in their inward parts, should + paint their outside with Catholicism."</p> + + <p>In view of evidence so contradictory, it is difficult, if not impossible, to form a + confident judgment as to the real character of those whose history we are attempting to + trace; but, leaving aside what is matter <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id= + "Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span>of doubt, the undisputed facts of their previous career + appear to show unmistakably that they were just the men who would be ready to look to + violence for a remedy of existing evils, and to whom it would not be difficult to + suggest its adoption.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN34" id="FN34"></a><a href="#FN34A">[34]</a></sup> When + James came to the throne Cecil was but a knight. He was created Baron Cecil of + Essendon, May 13th, 1603; Viscount Cranborne, August 20th, 1604; Earl of Salisbury, + May 4th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN35" id="FN35"></a><a href="#FN35A">[35]</a></sup> + Robert, as the second son, did not succeed to his father's title, which devolved upon + Thomas, the eldest, who was created Earl of Exeter on the same day on which Robert + became Earl of Salisbury.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN36" id="FN36"></a><a href="#FN36A">[36]</a></sup> + <i>Fragmenta Regalia</i>, 37. Ed. 1642.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN37" id="FN37"></a><a href="#FN37A">[37]</a></sup> He + was but little above five feet in height, and, in the phrase of the time, a + "Crouchback." King James, who was not a man of much delicacy in such matters, was + fond of giving him nicknames in consequence. Cecil wrote to Sir Thomas Lake, October + 24th, 1605: "I see nothing y<sup>t</sup> I can doe, can procure me so much favor, as + to be sure one whole day what title I shall have another. For from Essenden to + Cranborne, from Cranborne to Salisbury, from Salisbury to Beagle, from Beagle to Thom + Derry, from Thom Derry to Parret which I hate most, I have been so walked, as I think + by y<sup>t</sup> I come to Theobalds, I shall be called Tare or Sophie." (R.O. + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xv. 105.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN38" id="FN38"></a><a href="#FN38A">[38]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 92.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN39" id="FN39"></a><a href="#FN39A">[39]</a></sup> In + the same document James I. is spoken of as "the most judycious, learned, and rareste + kinge, that ever this worlde produced." (R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> xxviii. 29.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN40" id="FN40"></a><a href="#FN40A">[40]</a></sup> Digby + to the King, S.P., <i>Spain</i>, Aug. 8. Gardiner, <i>History</i>, ii. 216.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN41" id="FN41"></a><a href="#FN41A">[41]</a></sup> At + the trial of Essex, Cecil exclaimed, "I pray God to consume me where I stand, if I + hate not the Spaniard as much as any man living." (Bruce, <i>Introduction to Secret + Correspondence of Sir R. Cecil</i>, xxxiii.)</p> + + <p>Of the Spanish pension Mr. Gardiner, after endeavouring to show that originally + Cecil's acceptance of it may have been comparatively innocent, thus continues + (<i>History of England</i>, i. 216): "But it is plain that, even if this is the + explanation of his original intentions, such a comparatively innocent connection with + Spain soon extended itself to something worse, and that he consented to furnish the + ambassadors, from time to time, with information on the policy and intentions of the + English Government.... Of the persistence with which he exacted payment there can be + no doubt whatever. Five years later, when the opposition between the two governments + became more decided, he asked for an increase of his payments, and demanded that they + should be made in large sums as each piece of information was given."</p> + + <p>At the same time it appears highly probable that he was similarly in the pay of + France. <i>Ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN42" id="FN42"></a><a href="#FN42A">[42]</a></sup> Queen + Elizabeth regarded as treasonable any discussion of the question of the + succession.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN43" id="FN43"></a><a href="#FN43A">[43]</a></sup> + Gardiner, i. 215.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN44" id="FN44"></a><a href="#FN44A">[44]</a></sup> + <i>Chamberlain to Carleton</i>, July 9th, 1612, R.O.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN45" id="FN45"></a><a href="#FN45A">[45]</a></sup> "Tout + ce que vous a dit le Comte de Salisbury touchant le mariage d'Espagne est rempli de + deguisements et artifices à son accoutumée.... Toutefois, je ne veux + pas jurer qu'ils négocient plus sincerement et de meilleur foi avec lesdites + Espagnols qu'avec nous. Ils corromproient par trop leur naturel, s'ils le faisoient, + pour des gens qui ne leur scauroient guère de gré."—Le + Fèvre de la Boderie, <i>Ambassade</i>, i. 170.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN46" id="FN46"></a><a href="#FN46A">[46]</a></sup> (Of + the Earl of Northumberland.) "On tient le Comte de Salisbury pour principal auteur de + sa persécution, comme celui qui veut ne laisser personne en pied qui puisse + lui faire tête." De la Boderie. <i>Ibid.</i> 178.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN47" id="FN47"></a><a href="#FN47A">[47]</a></sup> R.O. + <i>Dom. James I.</i> lxix. 56.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN48" id="FN48"></a><a href="#FN48A">[48]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i>, May 27, 1612. Bishop Goodman, no enemy of Cecil, is inclined to believe + that at the time of the secretary's death there was a warrant out for his arrest. + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 45.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN49" id="FN49"></a><a href="#FN49A">[49]</a></sup> The + first of these epigrams, in Latin, concludes thus:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">Sero, Recurve, moreris sed serio;<br /> + Sero, jaces (bis mortuus) sed serio:<br /> + Sero saluti publicæ, serio tuæ.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>The second is in English:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">Whiles two RR's, both crouchbacks, stood at the helm,<br /> + The one spilt the blood royall, the other the realm.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>A marginal note explains that these were, "Richard Duke of Gloster, and Robert + Earl of Salisburie;" the anagram, of which title is "A silie burs." He also styles + the late minister a monkey (<i>cercopithecus</i>) and hobgoblin (<i>empusa</i>).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN50" id="FN50"></a><a href="#FN50A">[50]</a></sup> + Osborne, <i>Traditional Memoirs</i>, p. 236 (ed. 1811).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN51" id="FN51"></a><a href="#FN51A">[51]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 44.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN52" id="FN52"></a><a href="#FN52A">[52]</a></sup> + <i>Traditional Memoirs</i>, 181.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN53" id="FN53"></a><a href="#FN53A">[53]</a></sup> This + feeling was expressed in lampoons quoted by Osborne, e.g.:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"Here lies Hobinall, our pastor while here,<br /> + That once in a quarter our fleeces did sheare.<br /> + For oblation to Pan his custom was thus,<br /> + He first gave a trifle, then offer'd up us:<br /> + And through his false worship such power he did gaine,<br /> + As kept him o' th' mountain, and us on the plaine."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>Again, he is described as</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"Little bossive Robin that was so great,<br /> + Who seemed as sent from ugly fate,<br /> + To spoyle the prince, and rob the state,<br /> + Owning a mind of dismall endes,<br /> + As trappes for foes, and tricks for friends."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="right">(<i>Ibid.</i> 236.)</p> + + <p>Oldmixon (<i>History of Queen Elizabeth</i>, p. 620) says of the Earl of Essex, + "'Twas not likely that Cecil, whose Soul was of a narrow Size, and had no Room for + enlarged Sentiments of Ambition, Glory, and Public Spirit, should cease to undermine + a Hero, in comparison with whom he was both in Body and Mind a Piece of Deformity, if + there's nothing beautiful in Craft."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN54" id="FN54"></a><a href="#FN54A">[54]</a></sup> + <i>Court and Character of King James</i>, § 10.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN55" id="FN55"></a><a href="#FN55A">[55]</a></sup> + <i>Ambassade</i>, i. 58.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN56" id="FN56"></a><a href="#FN56A">[56]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> 401.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN57" id="FN57"></a><a href="#FN57A">[57]</a></sup> + Against Northumberland nothing was proved (<i>vide</i> de la Boderie, + <i>Ambassade</i>, i. 178), except that he had admitted Thomas Percy amongst the royal + pensioners without exacting the usual oath. He in vain demanded an open trial, but + was prosecuted in the Star Chamber, and there sentenced to a fine of £30,000 + (equal to at least ten times that sum in our money), and to be imprisoned for + life.</p> + + <p>Mr. Gardiner considers that, in regard both of Raleigh and of Northumberland, + Cecil acted with great moderation. It must, however, be remembered that in his secret + correspondence with King James, before the death of the queen, he had strenuously + endeavoured to poison the mind of that monarch against these his rivals. Thus he + wrote, December 4th, 1601 (as usual through Lord Henry Howard): "You must remember + that I gave you notice of the diabolical triplicity, that is, Cobham, Raleigh, and + Northumberland, that met every day at Durham-house, where Raleigh lies, in + consultation, which awaked all the best wits of the town ... to watch what chickens + they could hatch out of these cockatrice eggs that were daily and nightly sitten on." + (<i>Secret Correspondence of Sir Robert Cecil with James VI., King of Scotland</i>, + Edinburgh, 1766, p. 29.) Coming after this, the speedy ruin of all these men appears + highly suspicious.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN58" id="FN58"></a><a href="#FN58A">[58]</a></sup> Sir + Walter Cope in his <i>Apology</i> (Gutch, <i>Collectanea Curiosa</i>, i. No. 10) + says: "When living, the world observed with all admiration and applause; no sooner + dead, but it seeketh finally to suppress his excellent parts, and load his memory + with all imputations of corruption."</p> + + <p>Among such charges are enumerated "His Falsehood in Friendship.—That he + often made his friends fair promises, and underhand laid rubs to hinder their + preferment.—The secret passage of things I know not.... Great Counsellors have + their private and their publique ends...." etc.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN59" id="FN59"></a><a href="#FN59A">[59]</a></sup> Lord + Castlemaine after mentioning the chief features of the Gunpowder Plot, goes on: "But + let it not displease you, if we ask whether Ulysses be no better known?" + (<i>Catholique Apology</i>, p. 30.)</p> + + <p>Francis Herring in his Latin poem, <i>Pietas Pontificia</i> (published 1606), + speaking of Monteagle (called "Morleius," from his father's title), who took the + celebrated letter to Cecil, writes thus:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"Morleius Regis de consultoribus unum,<br /> + (Quem norat veteri nil quicquam cedere Ulyssi,<br /> + Juditio pollentem acri, ingenioque sagaci)<br /> + Seligit, atque illi Rem totam ex ordine pandit."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN60" id="FN60"></a><a href="#FN60A">[60]</a></sup> This + is so evident that it appears unnecessary to occupy space with proofs in detail. De + la Boderie remarks (<i>Ambassade</i>, i. 71) on the extraordinary rancour of the + minister against Catholics, and especially against Jesuits, and that "he wishes to + destroy them everywhere." Of this a remarkable confirmation is afforded by the + instructions given to Sir Thomas Parry when he was sent as ambassador, "Leiger," to + Paris, in 1603, at the head of which stood these extraordinary articles:</p> + + <ol> + <li>"To intimate to the French king the jealousy conceived in England upon the + revocation of the Jesuits, against former edicts.</li> + + <li>"To inform the French king that the English were disgusted at the maintenance + allowed to the French king's prelates and clergy, to priests and Jesuits that + passed out of his dominions into England, Scotland, and Ireland, to do bad + offices." (P.R.O. <i>France</i>, bundle 132, f. 314.)</li> + </ol> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN61" id="FN61"></a><a href="#FN61A">[61]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 5. Strype says of the time of Elizabeth: "The + faction of the Catholics in England is great, and able, if the kingdom were divided + into three parts, to make two of them." (<i>Annals</i>, iii. 313, quoted by Butler, + <i>Historical Memoirs</i>, ii. 177.)</p> + + <p>At the execution of Father Oldcorne, 1606, a proof was given of their numbers + which is said to have alarmed the king greatly. The Father having from the scaffold + invited all Catholics to pray with him, almost all present uncovered.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN62" id="FN62"></a><a href="#FN62A">[62]</a></sup> Of + this there can be no doubt, in spite of James's subsequent denial. Father Garnet + wrote to Parsons (April 16th, 1603): "There hath happened a great alteration by the + death of the Queen. Great fears were, but all are turned into greatest security, and + a golden time we have of unexpected freedom abroade.... The Catholicks have great + cause to hope for great respect, in that the nobility all almost labour for it, and + have good promise thereof from his Majesty." (Stonyhurst MSS. <i>Anglia</i>, iii. + 32.)</p> + + <p>Goodman says: "And certainly they [the Catholics] had very great promises from + him." (<i>Court of King James</i>, i. 86.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN63" id="FN63"></a><a href="#FN63A">[63]</a></sup> "The + Penal Laws, a code as savage as any that can be conceived since the foundation of the + world."—Lord Chief Justice Coleridge. (<i>To Lord Mayor Knill</i>, Nov. 9, + 1892.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN64" id="FN64"></a><a href="#FN64A">[64]</a></sup> + Gardiner, i. 100.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN65" id="FN65"></a><a href="#FN65A">[65]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, 18.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN66" id="FN66"></a><a href="#FN66A">[66]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid</i>. 20.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN67" id="FN67"></a><a href="#FN67A">[67]</a></sup> + Gardiner, i. 166.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN68" id="FN68"></a><a href="#FN68A">[68]</a></sup> + Green, <i>History of the English People</i>, iii. 62. Mr. Green adds: "Rumours of + Catholic conversions spread a panic which showed itself in an Act of the Parliament + of 1604 confirming the statutes of Elizabeth; and to this James gave his assent. He + promised, indeed, that the statute should remain inoperative." In May, 1604, the + Catholics boasted that they had been joined by 10,000 converts. (Gardiner, + <i>Hist</i>. i. 202.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN69" id="FN69"></a><a href="#FN69A">[69]</a></sup> + <i>Catholique Apology</i>, 404.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN70" id="FN70"></a><a href="#FN70A">[70]</a></sup> + Salisbury, in reward of his services on this occasion, received the Garter, May 20th, + 1606, and was honoured on the occasion with an almost regal triumph.</p> + + <p>Of the proceedings subsequent to the Plot we are told: "In passing these laws for + the security of the Protestant Religion, the Earl of Salisbury exerted himself with + distinguished zeal and vigour, which gained him great love and honour from the + kingdom, as appeared in some measure, in the universal attendance on him at his + installation with the Order of the Garter, on the 20th of May, 1606, at Windsor." + (Birch, <i>Historical View</i>, p. 256.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN71" id="FN71"></a><a href="#FN71A">[71]</a></sup> This + belief is so notorious that one instance must suffice as evidence for it. A paper of + informations addressed to Cecil himself, April, 1604, declares that the Catholics + hoped to see a good day yet, and that "his Majesty would suffer a kinde of + Tolleracyon, for his inclynacyon is good, howsoever the Councell set out his + speeches." (S.P.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> vii. 86.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN72" id="FN72"></a><a href="#FN72A">[72]</a></sup> Mr. + Gardiner (<i>Hist.</i> i. 229, note) says that arrears were never demanded in the + case of the fine of £20 per lunar month for non-attendance at the parish + church. Father Gerard, however, a contemporary witness, distinctly states that they + were. (<i>Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot</i>, ed. Morris, p. 62.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN73" id="FN73"></a><a href="#FN73A">[73]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 100.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN74" id="FN74"></a><a href="#FN74A">[74]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i>, p. 46.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN75" id="FN75"></a><a href="#FN75A">[75]</a></sup> + Stonyhurst MSS., <i>Anglia</i>, iii. 103.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN76" id="FN76"></a><a href="#FN76A">[76]</a></sup> Of + the Prince of Wales it was prophesied:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"The eighth Henry did pull down Monks and their cells,<br /> + The ninth will pull down Bishops and their bells."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN77" id="FN77"></a><a href="#FN77A">[77]</a></sup> + Concerning this letter see Appendix B, <i>Digby's Letter to Salisbury</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN78" id="FN78"></a><a href="#FN78A">[78]</a></sup> R.O. + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvii. 10.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN79" id="FN79"></a><a href="#FN79A">[79]</a></sup> + Hallam, <i>Constitutional Hist.</i> i. 392 (3rd ed.).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN80" id="FN80"></a><a href="#FN80A">[80]</a></sup> See + Appendix C, <i>The Question of Succession</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN81" id="FN81"></a><a href="#FN81A">[81]</a></sup> + <i>Agriculture and Prices</i>, v. 5.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN82" id="FN82"></a><a href="#FN82A">[82]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 17.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN83" id="FN83"></a><a href="#FN83A">[83]</a></sup> + Gardiner, <i>Hist.</i> i. 84.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN84" id="FN84"></a><a href="#FN84A">[84]</a></sup> Trial + of Father Garnet (Cobbett's <i>State Trials</i>, ii. 243).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN85" id="FN85"></a><a href="#FN85A">[85]</a></sup> + Camden, the historian, to Sir R. Cotton, March 15th, 1596. (Birch, <i>Original + Letters</i>, 2nd series, iii. p. 179.) Various writers erroneously suppose this + transaction to have occurred in March, 1603, on occasion of Elizabeth's last illness. + The correct date, 1596, given by Sir Henry Ellis, is supplied by a statement + contained in the letter, that this was her Majesty's "climacterick year," that is, + her sixty-third, this number, as the multiple of the potent factors seven and nine, + being held of prime importance in human life. Elizabeth was born in 1533.</p> + + <p>From Garnet's examination of March 14th, 1605-6 (<i>Dom. James I.</i> xix. 44), we + learn that Catesby was at large at the time of the queen's demise.</p> + + <p>For Cecil's description of the men, see Winwood's <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 172.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN86" id="FN86"></a><a href="#FN86A">[86]</a></sup> + Catesby purchased his life for a fine of 4,000 marks, and Tresham of 3,000. Mr. + Jessopp says that the former sum is equivalent at least to £30,000 at the + present day. (<i>Dict. Nat. Biog., Catesby</i>.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN87" id="FN87"></a><a href="#FN87A">[87]</a></sup> But + see Appendix D, <i>The Spanish Treason</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN88" id="FN88"></a><a href="#FN88A">[88]</a></sup> + Father Gerard says of him that "he paid them [the pursuivants] so well for their + labour not with crowns of gold, but with cracked crowns sometimes, and with dry blows + instead of drink and other good cheer, that they durst not visit him any more unless + they brought store of help with them." (<i>Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. + 86.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN89" id="FN89"></a><a href="#FN89A">[89]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 57.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN90" id="FN90"></a><a href="#FN90A">[90]</a></sup> + <i>Catholique Apology</i>, p. 403.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN91" id="FN91"></a><a href="#FN91A">[91]</a></sup> + <i>E.g.</i>, by Mr. Talbot of Grafton, father-in-law of Robert Winter, who drove + their envoys away with threats and reproaches (Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. + 112), and by Sir Robert Digby, of Coleshill, cousin to Sir Everard, who assisted in + taking prisoners. (R.O. <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 42.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN92" id="FN92"></a><a href="#FN92A">[92]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 263.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN93" id="FN93"></a><a href="#FN93A">[93]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 151.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN94" id="FN94"></a><a href="#FN94A">[94]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 38.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN95" id="FN95"></a><a href="#FN95A">[95]</a></sup> + <i>Life of a Conspirator, by one of his Descendants</i>, p. 150.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN96" id="FN96"></a><a href="#FN96A">[96]</a></sup> + <i>English Protestants' Plea and Petition for English Priests and Papists.</i> The + author of this book (published 1621) describes himself as a priest who has been for + many years on the English mission. His title indicates that he draws his arguments + from Protestant sources.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN97" id="FN97"></a><a href="#FN97A">[97]</a></sup> P. + 56.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN98" id="FN98"></a><a href="#FN98A">[98]</a></sup> + November 25th, 1605, <i>Stowe MSS.</i> 168, 61.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III.</h2> + + <h3>THE OPINION OF CONTEMPORARIES AND HISTORIANS.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">We</span> have now for so long a period been + accustomed to accept the official story regarding the Gunpowder Plot, that most readers + will be surprised to hear that at the time of its occurrence, and for more than a + century afterwards, there were, to say the least, many intelligent men who took for + granted that in some way or other the actual conspirators were but the dupes and + instruments of more crafty men than themselves, and in their mad enterprise unwittingly + played the game of ministers of State.</p> + + <p>From the beginning the government itself anticipated this, as is evidenced by the + careful and elaborate account of the whole affair drawn up on the 7th of November, + 1605—two days after the "discovery"—seemingly for the benefit of the Privy + Council.<sup><a name="FN99A" id="FN99A"></a><a href="#FN99">[99]</a></sup> This + important document, which is in the handwriting of Levinus Munck, Cecil's secretary, + with numerous and significant emendations from the hand of Cecil himself, speaks, + amongst other things, of the need of circumspection, "considering how apt the world is + nowadays to think all providence and intelligences to <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span>be but practices." The result did not falsify + the expectation. Within five weeks we find a letter written from London to a + correspondent abroad,<sup><a name="FN100A" id="FN100A"></a><a href= + "#FN100">[100]</a></sup> wherein it is said: "Those that have practical experience of + the way in which things are done, hold it as certain that there has been foul play, and + that some of the Council secretly spun the web to entangle these poor gentlemen, as did + Secretary Walsingham in other cases," and it is clear that the writer has but recorded + an opinion widely prevalent. To this the government again bear witness, for they found + it advisable to issue an official version of the history, in the <i>True and Perfect + Relation</i>, and the <i>Discourse of the Manner of the Discovery of the Gunpowder + Plot</i>, the appearance of which was justified expressly on the ground that "there do + pass from hand to hand divers uncertain, untrue, and incoherent reports and relations," + and that it is very important "for men to understand the birth and growth of the said + abominable and detestable conspiracy." The accounts published with this object are, by + the common consent of historians, flagrantly untruthful and untrustworthy.<sup><a name= + "FN101A" id="FN101A"></a><a href="#FN101">[101]</a></sup> <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span>We likewise find Secretary + Cecil writing to instruct Sir E. Coke, the Attorney-General, as to his conduct of the + case against the conspirators, in view of the "lewd" reports current in regard of the + manner in which it had been discovered.<sup><a name="FN102A" id="FN102A"></a><a href= + "#FN102">[102]</a></sup> The same minister, in the curious political manifesto which he + issued in connection with the affair,<sup><a name="FN103A" id="FN103A"></a><a href= + "#FN103">[103]</a></sup> again bears witness to the same effect, when he declares that + the papists, after the manner of Nero, were throwing the blame of their crime upon + others.</p> + + <p>Clearly, however, it was not to the papists alone that such an explanation commended + itself. The Puritan Osborne<sup><a name="FN104A" id="FN104A"></a><a href= + "#FN104">[104]</a></sup> speaks of the manner in which the "discovery" was managed as + "a neat device of the Treasurer's, he being very plentiful in such plots." Goodman, + Anglican Bishop of Gloucester, another contemporary, is even more explicit. After + describing the indignation of the Catholics when they found themselves deceived in + their hopes at the hands of James, he goes on: "The great statesman had intelligence of + all this, and because he would show his service to the State, he would first contrive + and then discover a <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg + 45]</a></span>treason, and the more odious and hateful the treason were, his service + would be the greater and the more acceptable."<sup><a name="FN105A" id= + "FN105A"></a><a href="#FN105">[105]</a></sup> Another notable witness is quoted by the + Jesuit Father Martin Grene, in a letter to his brother Christopher, January 1st, + 1665-6:<sup><a name="FN106A" id="FN106A"></a><a href="#FN106">[106]</a></sup> "I have + heard strange things, which, if ever I can make out, will be very pertinent: for + certain, the late Bishop of Armagh, Usher, was divers times heard to say, that if + papists knew what he knew, the blame of the Gunpowder Treason would not lie on them." + In like manner we find it frequently asserted on the authority of Lord Cobham and + others,<sup><a name="FN107A" id="FN107A"></a><a href="#FN107">[107]</a></sup> that King + James himself, when he had time to realize the truth of the matter, was in the habit of + speaking of the Fifth of November as "Cecil's holiday."</p> + + <p>Such a belief must have been widely entertained, otherwise it could not have been + handed on, as it was, for generations. It is not too much to say that historians for + almost a century and a half, if they did not themselves favour the theory of the + government's complicity, at least bore witness how widely that idea prevailed. Thus, to + confine ourselves at present to Protestant writers, Sanderson,<sup><a name="FN108A" id= + "FN108A"></a><a href="#FN108">[108]</a></sup> acknowledging that the secretary was + accused of having manipulated the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id= + "Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span>transaction, says no word to indicate that he repudiates + such a charge. Welwood<sup><a name="FN109A" id="FN109A"></a><a href= + "#FN109">[109]</a></sup> is of opinion that Cecil was aware of the Plot long before the + "discovery," and that the famous letter to Monteagle was "a contrivance of his own." + Oldmixon writes<sup><a name="FN110A" id="FN110A"></a><a href="#FN110">[110]</a></sup> + "notwithstanding the general joy, ... there were some who insinuated that the Plot was + of the King's own making, or that he was privy to it from first to last." + Carte<sup><a name="FN111A" id="FN111A"></a><a href="#FN111">[111]</a></sup> does not + believe that James knew anything of it, but considers it "not improbable" that Cecil + was better informed. Burnet<sup><a name="FN112A" id="FN112A"></a><a href= + "#FN112">[112]</a></sup> complains of the impudence of the papists of his day, who + denied the conspiracy, and pretended it was an artifice of the minister's "to engage + some desperate men into a plot, which he managed so that he could discover it when he + pleased." Fuller<sup><a name="FN113A" id="FN113A"></a><a href="#FN113">[113]</a></sup> + bears witness to the general belief, but considers it inconsistent with the well-known + piety of King James. Bishop Kennet, in his Fifth of November sermon at St. Paul's, in + 1715, talks in a similar strain. So extreme, indeed, does the incredulity and + uncertainty appear to have been, that the Puritan Prynne<sup><a name="FN114A" id= + "FN114A"></a><a href="#FN114">[114]</a></sup> is inclined to suspect Bancroft, the + Archbishop of Canterbury, of having been engaged in the conspiracy; while one of the + furious zealots who followed the lead of Titus Oates, mournfully testified that there + were those in his day who looked upon the Powder Treason "as upon a romantic + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span>story, or a + politic invention, or a State trick," giving no more credence to it than to the + histories of the "Grand Cyrus, or Guy of Warwick, or Amadis de Gaul,"—or, as we + should now say, Jack the Giant Killer.</p> + + <p>The general scope and drift of such suspicions are well indicated by Bevil Higgons, + "This impious design," he writes<sup><a name="FN115A" id="FN115A"></a><a href= + "#FN115">[115]</a></sup> of the Plot, "gave the greatest blow to the Catholic interest + in England, by rendering that religion so odious to the people. The common opinion + concerning the discovery of the Plot, by a letter to the Lord Mounteagle, has not been + universally allowed to be the real truth of the matter, for some have affirmed that + this design was first hammered in the forge of Cecil, who intended to have produced + this plot in the time of Queen Elizabeth, but prevented by her death he resumed his + project in this reign, with a design to have so enraged the nation as to have expelled + all Roman Catholics, and confiscated their estates. To this end, by his secret + emissaries, he enticed some hot-headed men of that persuasion, who, ignorant whence the + design first came, heartily engaged in this execrable Powder Treason.... Though this + account should not be true," he continues, "it is certain that the Court of England had + notice of this Plot from France and Italy long before the pretended discovery; upon + which Cecil ... framed that letter to the Lord Mounteagle, with a design to make the + discovery seem the more miraculous, and at the same time magnify the judgment of the + king, who by his deep penetration was to have the honour of unravelling so ambiguous + and dark a riddle."</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span></p> + + <p>It may be added that amongst modern historians who have given special attention to + this period, several, though repudiating the notion that Cecil originated the Plot, are + strongly of opinion that as to the important episode of the "discovery," the + traditional story is a fabrication. Thus, Mr. Brewer<sup><a name="FN116A" id= + "FN116A"></a><a href="#FN116">[116]</a></sup> declares it to be quite certain that + Cecil had previous knowledge of the design, and that the "discovery" was a fraud. + Lodge<sup><a name="FN117A" id="FN117A"></a><a href="#FN117">[117]</a></sup> is of the + same opinion, and so is the author of the <i>Annals of England</i>.<sup><a name= + "FN118A" id="FN118A"></a><a href="#FN118">[118]</a></sup> Jardine<sup><a name="FN119A" + id="FN119A"></a><a href="#FN119">[119]</a></sup> inclines to the belief that the + government contrived the letter to Monteagle in order to conceal the means by which + their information had in reality been obtained. Mr. Gardiner, though dismissing the + idea as "absurd," acknowledges that his contemporaries accused Cecil of inventing the + whole Plot.<sup><a name="FN120A" id="FN120A"></a><a href="#FN120">[120]</a></sup></p> + + <p>So much for the testimony of Protestants. As for those who had to suffer in + consequence of the affair, there is no need to multiply testimonies. Lord Castlemaine + tells us<sup><a name="FN121A" id="FN121A"></a><a href="#FN121">[121]</a></sup> that + "the Catholics of England, who knew Cecil's ways of acting and their own innocence, + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span>suspected him + from the beginning, as hundreds still alive can testify." Father Henry More, S.J., a + contemporary, speaks to the same effect.<sup><a name="FN122A" id="FN122A"></a><a href= + "#FN122">[122]</a></sup> Father John Gerard, who was not only a contemporary, but one + of those accused of complicity, intimates<sup><a name="FN123A" id="FN123A"></a><a href= + "#FN123">[123]</a></sup> his utter disbelief of the official narrative concerning the + discovery, and his conviction that those who had the scanning of the redoubtable letter + were "well able in shorter time and with fewer doubts to decipher a darker riddle and + find out a greater secret than that matter was." One Floyde, a spy, testified in + 1615<sup><a name="FN124A" id="FN124A"></a><a href="#FN124">[124]</a></sup> to having + frequently heard various Jesuits say, that the government were aware of the Plot + several months before they thought fit to "discover" it.</p> + + <p>The Catholic view is expressed with much point and force by an anonymous writer of + the eighteenth century:<sup><a name="FN125A" id="FN125A"></a><a href= + "#FN125">[125]</a></sup> "I shall touch briefly upon a few particulars relating to this + Plot, for the happy discovery whereof an anniversary holiday has now been kept for + above a hundred years. Is it out of pure gratitude to God the nation is so particularly + devout on this occasion? If so, it is highly commendable: for we ought to thank God for + all things, and therefore I cannot deny but there is all the reason in the world to + give him solemn thanks, for that the king and Parliament never were in any danger of + being hurt by the Powder Plot.... I am far from denying the Gunpowder Plot. Nay, I + believe as firmly that Catesby, with twelve more popish associates, had <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span>a design to blow up K. + James, as I believe that the father of that same king was effectually blown up by the + Earls of Murray, Morton, Bothwell, and others of the Reformed Church of Scotland. + However ... I humbly conceive I may say the king and Parliament were in no danger of + being hurt by it, and my reason is because they had not less a man than the prime + minister of state for their tutelar angel; a person deeply read in politics; who had + inherited the double spirit of his predecessor Walsingham, knew all his tricks of + legerdemain, and could as seasonably discover plots as contrive them.... This much at + least is certain, that the letter written to my Lord Mounteagle, by which the Plot was + discovered, had not a fool, but a very wise sophister for its author: for it was so + craftily worded, that though it was mysterious enough on the one hand to prevent a full + evidence that it was written on purpose to discover the Plot, yet it was clear enough + on the other to be understood with the help of a little consideration, as the event + soon showed. Indeed, when it was brought to Secretary Cecil, he, poor gentleman, had + not penetration enough to understand the meaning of it, and said it was certainly + written by a madman. But there, I fear, he wronged himself. For the secretary was no + madman. On the contrary, he had too much wit to explain it himself, and was too refined + a politician to let slip so favourable an occasion of making his court to the king, who + was to have the compliment made him of being the only Solomon wise enough to unfold + this dark mystery. Which while his Majesty was doing with a great deal of ease, the + secretary was all the while at his elbow admiring and applauding his <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>wonderful sagacity.... So + that, in all probability, the same man was the chief underhand contriver and discoverer + of the Plot; and the greatest part of the bubbles concerned in it were trapanned into + it by one who took sure care that none but themselves should be hurt by it.... But be + that as it will, there is no doubt but that they who suffer themselves to be drawn into + a plot like fools, deserve to be hanged for it like knaves."</p> + + <p>The opinion of Dodd, the historian, has already been indicated, which in another + place he thus emphasizes and explains:<sup><a name="FN126A" id="FN126A"></a><a href= + "#FN126">[126]</a></sup> "Some persons in chief power suspecting the king would be very + indulgent to Catholics, several stratagems were made use of to exasperate him against + them, and cherishing the Gunpowder Plot is thought to be a masterpiece in this + way."<sup><a name="FN127A" id="FN127A"></a><a href="#FN127">[127]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It would not be difficult to continue similar citations, but enough has now been + said to show that it is nothing new to charge the chief minister of James I. with + having fostered the conspiracy for his own purposes, or even to have actually set it + a-going. It appears perfectly clear that from the first there were <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span>not a few, and those not + Catholics only, who entertained such a belief, and that the facts of the case are + inadequately represented by historians, who imply, like Mr. Jardine, that such a theory + was first broached long afterwards, and adopted by Catholics alone.<sup><a name= + "FN128A" id="FN128A"></a><a href="#FN128">[128]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It is moreover apparent that if in recent times historians have forgotten that such + a view was ever held, or consider it too preposterous for serious discussion, this is + not because fuller knowledge of the details of the conspiracy have discredited it. The + official version of the story has remained in possession of the field, and it has + gradually been assumed that this must substantially be true. In consequence, as it + seems, writers of history, approaching the subject with this conviction, have failed to + remark many points suggested even by the documentary evidence at our disposal, and + still more emphatically by the recorded facts, which cannot but throw grave doubt upon + almost every particular of the traditional account, while making it impossible to + believe that, as to what is most essential, the Plot was in reality what has for so + long been supposed. That long before the "discovery" the Plot must have been, and in + fact was, known to the government; that this knowledge was artfully dissimulated, in + order to make political capital <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id= + "Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span>out of it; that for the same purpose the sensational + circumstances of its discovery were deliberately arranged; and that there are grave + reasons for suspecting the beginnings of the desperate enterprise, as well as its + catastrophe, to have been dexterously manipulated for State purposes;—such are + the conclusions, the evidence for which will now be considered.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN99" id="FN99"></a><a href="#FN99A">[99]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 129. Printed in <i>Archæologia</i>, xii. 202*.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN100" id="FN100"></a><a href="#FN100A">[100]</a></sup> + R.O. <i>Roman Transcripts</i> (Bliss), No. 86, December 10th, 1605 (Italian).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN101" id="FN101"></a><a href="#FN101A">[101]</a></sup> + Mr. Jardine writes (<i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. p. 235), "<i>The True and Perfect + Relation</i> ... is certainly not deserving of the character which its title imports. + It is not <i>true</i>, because many occurrences on the trial are wilfully + misrepresented; and it is not <i>perfect</i>, because the whole evidence, and many + facts and circumstances which must have happened, are omitted, and incidents are + inserted which could not by possibility have taken place on the occasion. It is + obviously a false and imperfect relation of the proceedings; a tale artfully garbled + and misrepresented, like many others of the same age, to serve a State purpose, and + intended and calculated to mislead the judgment of the world upon the facts of the + case." Of the <i>Discourse</i> he speaks in similar terms. (<i>Ibid.</i>, p. 4.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN102" id="FN102"></a><a href="#FN102A">[102]</a></sup> + R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> xix. 94. Printed by Jardine, <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. + 120 (note).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN103" id="FN103"></a><a href="#FN103A">[103]</a></sup> + <i>Answere to certaine Scandalous Papers, scattered abroad under colour of a Catholic + Admonition.</i> (Published in January, 1605-6.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN104" id="FN104"></a><a href="#FN104A">[104]</a></sup> + <i>Traditional Memoirs</i>, 36. Of this writer Lord Castlemaine says, "He was born + before this plot, and was also an inquisitive man, a frequenter of company, of a + noted wit, of an excellent family, and as Protestant a one as any in the whole + nation."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN105" id="FN105"></a><a href="#FN105A">[105]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i> (1839), i. 102.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN106" id="FN106"></a><a href="#FN106A">[106]</a></sup> + Stonyhurst MSS., <i>Anglia</i>, v. 67.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN107" id="FN107"></a><a href="#FN107A">[107]</a></sup> + <i>E.g.</i>, in the <i>Advocate of Conscience Liberty</i> (1673), p. 225.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN108" id="FN108"></a><a href="#FN108A">[108]</a></sup> + <i>History of Mary Queen of Scots and James I.</i>, p. 334. Bishop Kennet, in his + Fifth of November Sermon, 1715, boldly declares that Sanderson speaks not of Cecil + the statesman, but of Cecil "a busy Romish priest" (and, he might have added, a paid + government spy). The assertion is utterly and obviously false.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN109" id="FN109"></a><a href="#FN109A">[109]</a></sup> + <i>Memoirs</i>, p. 22.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN110" id="FN110"></a><a href="#FN110A">[110]</a></sup> + <i>History of England, Royal House of Stuart</i>, p. 27.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN111" id="FN111"></a><a href="#FN111A">[111]</a></sup> + <i>General History of England</i>, iii. 757.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN112" id="FN112"></a><a href="#FN112A">[112]</a></sup> + <i>History of His Own Times</i>, i. 11.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN113" id="FN113"></a><a href="#FN113A">[113]</a></sup> + <i>Church History</i>, Book X. § 39.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN114" id="FN114"></a><a href="#FN114A">[114]</a></sup> + <i>Antipathie of the English Lordly Prelacie, to the regall Monarchie and Civill + Unity</i>, p. 151.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN115" id="FN115"></a><a href="#FN115A">[115]</a></sup> + <i>A Short View of the English History</i>, p. 296.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN116" id="FN116"></a><a href="#FN116A">[116]</a></sup> + Note to <i>Fuller's Church History</i>, x. § 39, and to the <i>Student's + Hume</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN117" id="FN117"></a><a href="#FN117A">[117]</a></sup> + <i>Illustrations</i>, iii. 172.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN118" id="FN118"></a><a href="#FN118A">[118]</a></sup> + Parker and Co. This author says of Cecil and his rival Raleigh, "Both were + unprincipled men, but Cecil was probably the worst. He is suspected not only of + having contrived the strange plot in which Raleigh was involved, but of being privy + to the proceedings of Catesby and his associates, though he suffered them to remain + unmolested, in order to secure the forfeiture of their estates" (p. 338).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN119" id="FN119"></a><a href="#FN119A">[119]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 68.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN120" id="FN120"></a><a href="#FN120A">[120]</a></sup> + <i>History of England</i>, i. 254, note.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN121" id="FN121"></a><a href="#FN121A">[121]</a></sup> + <i>Catholique Apology</i>, p. 412.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN122" id="FN122"></a><a href="#FN122A">[122]</a></sup> + <i>Hist. Prov. Angl. S.J.</i>, p. 310.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN123" id="FN123"></a><a href="#FN123A">[123]</a></sup> + <i>Condition of Catholics under James I.</i>, p. 100.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN124" id="FN124"></a><a href="#FN124A">[124]</a></sup> + R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i>, lxxxi. 70, August 29th, 1615.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN125" id="FN125"></a><a href="#FN125A">[125]</a></sup> + <i>A Plain and Rational Account of the Catholick Faith</i>, Rouen, 1721, p. 197.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN126" id="FN126"></a><a href="#FN126A">[126]</a></sup> + <i>Certamen utriusque Ecclesiæ</i>, James I.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN127" id="FN127"></a><a href="#FN127A">[127]</a></sup> + The author of the <i>English Protestants' Plea</i> (1621) says: "Old stratagems and + tragedies of Queene Elizabeth's time must needs be renewed and playde againe, to + bring not only the Catholikes of England, but their holy religion into obloquy" (p. + 56).</p> + + <p>Peter Talbot, Bishop of Dublin, in the <i>Polititian's Catechisme</i> (1658) + writes: "That Cecil was the contriver, or at least the fomenter of [the Plot,] was + testified by one of his own domestick Gentlemen, who advertised a certain Catholike, + by name Master Buck, two months before, of a wicked designe his Master had against + Catholikes" (p. 94).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN128" id="FN128"></a><a href="#FN128A">[128]</a></sup> A + writer, signing himself "Architect," in an article describing the old palace of + Westminster (<i>Gentleman's Magazine</i>, July, 1800, p. 627), having occasion to + mention the Gunpowder Plot, observes: "This Plot is now pretty well understood not to + have been hatched by the Papists, but by an inveterate foe of the Catholicks of that + day, the famous minister of James.... All well-informed persons at present laugh at + the whole of this business."</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV.</h2> + + <h3>THE TRADITIONAL STORY.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">The</span> history of the Gunpowder Plot prior to its + discovery, as related with much circumstantiality by the government of the day, has, in + all essential particulars, been accepted without demur by the great majority of modern + writers. We have already seen that those who lived nearer to the period in question + were less easily convinced; it remains to show that the internal evidence of the story + itself is incompatible with its truthfulness.</p> + + <p>The point upon which everything turns is the secret, and therefore dangerous, + character of the conspiracy, which, as we are told, completely eluded the vigilance of + the authorities, and was on the very verge of success before even a breath of suspicion + was aroused, being balked only by a lucky accident occurring at the eleventh hour, in a + manner fitly described as miraculous.</p> + + <p>On the other hand, however, many plain and obvious considerations combine to show + that such an account cannot be true. It is not easy to believe that much which is said + to have been done by the conspirators ever occurred at all. It is clear that, if such + things did occur, they can by no possibility have escaped observation. There is + evidence that the government knew of the Plot long before they suddenly "discovered" + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span>it. Finally, the + story of the said "discovery," and the manner in which it took place, is plainly not + only untrue, but devised to conceal the truth; while the elaborate care expended upon + it sufficiently indicates how important it was held that the truth should be + concealed.</p> + + <p>There are, moreover, arguments, which appear to deserve consideration, suggesting + the conclusion that the Plot was actually set on foot by the secret instigation of + those who designed to make it serve their ends, as in fact it did. For our purpose, + however, it is not necessary to insist greatly upon these. It will be enough to show + that, whatever its origin, the conspiracy was, and must have been, known to those in + power, who, playing with their infatuated dupes, allowed them to go on with their mad + scheme, till the moment came to strike with full effect; thus impressing the nation + with a profound sense of its marvellous deliverance, and winning its confidence for + those to whose vigilance and sagacity alone that deliverance appeared due.</p> + + <p>That we may rightly follow the details of the story told to us, we must in the first + place understand the topography of the scene of operations, which, with the aid of the + illustrations given, will not be difficult.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image4" id="image4"></a><img src="images/image4.png" width="600" height= + "345" alt="HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT IN THE TIME OF JAMES I." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">houses of parliament in the time of James + i.</span></span> + </div> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image5" id="image5"></a><img src="images/image5.png" width="600" height= + "361" alt="Index. Parliament Houses in the time of James I." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">Index. Parliament Houses in the time of James + I.</span></span> + </div> + + <table> + <tr> + <td><span class="smcap">a.</span> The House of Lords.<br /> + <span class="smcap">b.</span> Chamber under the House of Lords, called "Guy Faukes' + Cellar."<br /> + <span class="smcap">c.</span> The Prince's Chamber.<br /> + <span class="smcap">d.</span> The Painted Chamber.<br /> + <span class="smcap">e.</span> The "White Hall" or Court of Requests.<br /> + <span class="smcap">f.</span> The House of Commons (formerly St. Stephen's + Chapel).<br /> + <span class="smcap">g.</span> Westminster Hall.<br /> + <span class="smcap">h.</span> St. Stephen's Cloisters, converted into houses for + the Tellers of the Exchequer.<br /> + <span class="smcap">i.</span> Garden of the Old Palace (afterwards called "Cotton + Garden").<br /> + <span class="smcap">j.</span> House built on the site of the Chapel of "Our Lady of + the Pew" (called later "Cotton House").<br /> + <span class="smcap">k k k.</span> Houses built upon ruins of the walls of the Old + Palace.</td> + + <td><span class="smcap">l.</span> Vault under the Painted Chamber.<br /> + <span class="smcap">m.</span> Yard or Court into which a doorway opened from Guy + Faukes' Cellar.<br /> + <span class="smcap">n.</span> Passage leading from the same Yard or Court into + Parliament Place.<br /> + <span class="smcap">o.</span> Parliament Place.<br /> + <span class="smcap">p.</span> Parliament Stairs (formerly called "The Queen's + Bridge").<br /> + <span class="smcap">q q.</span> The River Thames.<br /> + <span class="smcap">r.</span> Old Palace Yard.<br /> + <span class="smcap">s.</span> Westminster Abbey.<br /> + <span class="smcap">t.</span> St. Margaret's Church.<br /> + <span class="smcap">u</span> <span class="smcap">v</span> <span class= + "smcap">w.</span> Buildings of the Old Palace, called "Heaven" (or "Paradise"), + "Hell," and "Purgatory."<br /> + <span class="smcap">x.</span> New Palace Yard.<br /> + <span class="smcap">y.</span> Bell Tower of St. Stephen's.<br /> + <span class="smcap">z.</span> The Speaker's Garden.</td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span></p> + + <p>The old House of Lords<sup><a name="FN129A" id="FN129A"></a><a href= + "#FN129">[129]</a></sup> was a chamber occupying the first floor of a building which + stood about fifty yards from the left bank of the Thames, to which it was parallel, the + stream at this point running almost due north. Beneath the Peers' Chamber, on the + ground floor, was a large room, which plays an important part in our history. This had + originally served as the palace kitchen,<sup><a name="FN130A" id="FN130A"></a><a href= + "#FN130">[130]</a></sup> and though commonly described as a "cellar" or a "vault" was + in reality neither, for it stood on the level of the ground outside, and had a flat + ceiling, formed by the beams which supported the flooring of the Lords' apartment + above.<sup><a name="FN131A" id="FN131A"></a><a href="#FN131">[131]</a></sup> It ran + beneath the said Peers' Chamber from end to end, and measured 77 feet in length, by 24 + feet 4 inches in width.</p> + + <p>At either end, the building abutted upon another running transversely to it; that on + the north being the "Painted Chamber," probably erected by Edward the Confessor, and + that on the south the "Prince's <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id= + "Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span>Chamber," assigned by its architectural features to the + reign of Henry III. The former served as a place of conference for Lords and + Commons,<sup><a name="FN132A" id="FN132A"></a><a href="#FN132">[132]</a></sup> the + latter as the robing-room of the Lords. The royal throne stood at the south end of the + House, near the Prince's Chamber.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image6" id="image6"></a><img src="images/image6.png" width="600" height= + "495" alt="GROUND PLAN OF THE SCENE OF ACTION." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">ground plan of the scene of action.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>Originally the Parliament Chamber and the "cellar" beneath it were lighted by large + windows on both sides; subsequently, houses raised against it <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span>blocked these up, and the + Lords were supplied with light by dormers constructed in the roof. The walls of their + apartment were then hung with tapestry, representing the defeat of the Spanish Armada. + Although precise information on the point is not easy to obtain, it would appear that + this did not occur till a period later than that with which we are + concerned.<sup><a name="FN133A" id="FN133A"></a><a href="#FN133">[133]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Such was the position to be attacked. As a first step, the conspirators resolved to + hire a house in the immediate neighbourhood, to serve them as a base of operations. + Thomas Percy was selected to appear as the principal in this part of the business, for, + being one of the king's pensioners, he had frequently to be in attendance at Court, and + might naturally wish to have a lodging close at hand. The house chosen was one, or + rather a part of one,<sup><a name="FN134A" id="FN134A"></a><a href= + "#FN134">[134]</a></sup> standing near the Prince's Chamber, and on the side towards + the river.<sup><a name="FN135A" id="FN135A"></a><a href="#FN135">[135]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In treating for the lease of this tenement Percy seems to have conducted himself in + a manner altogether different from what we might have expected of one whose object + required him, above all, to avoid <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id= + "Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span>attracting notice. He appears, in fact, to have made the + greatest possible ado about the business. The apartments were already let to one + Ferrers, who was unwilling to give them up, and Percy eventually succeeded in his + purpose, after not only "long suit by himself," but also "great intreaty of Mr. + Carleton, Mr. Epsley, and other gentlemen belonging to the Earl of + Northumberland."<sup><a name="FN136A" id="FN136A"></a><a href="#FN136">[136]</a></sup> + These gentlemen were never said to have been privy to the Conspiracy, and one of them, + the well-known Dudley Carleton, afterwards Viscount Dorchester, was not only at this + time secretary to Sir <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg + 62]</a></span>Thomas Parry, the Ambassador in France, but was "patronised" by Cecil + himself.<sup><a name="FN137A" id="FN137A"></a><a href="#FN137">[137]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image7" id="image7"></a><img src="images/image7.png" width="600" height= + "477" alt="THE OLD HOUSE OF LORDS, FROM THE EAST OR RIVER SIDE, SHOWING THE GARDEN." + title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">the old house of lords, from + the east or river side, showing the garden.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>Neither does the house appear to have been well suited to serve the purposes for + which it was taken. Speed tells us,<sup><a name="FN138A" id="FN138A"></a><a href= + "#FN138">[138]</a></sup> and he is confirmed by Bishop Barlow of Lincoln,<sup><a name= + "FN139A" id="FN139A"></a><a href="#FN139">[139]</a></sup> that it was let out to + tenants only when Parliament was not assembled, and during a session formed part of the + premises at the disposal of the Lords, whom it served as a withdrawing room. As the + Plot was, of necessity, to take effect during a session,<sup><a name="FN140A" id= + "FN140A"></a><a href="#FN140">[140]</a></sup> when the place would thus be in other + hands, it is very hard to understand how it was intended that the final and all + important operation should be conducted.</p> + + <p>The bargain for the house was concluded May 24th, 1604,<sup><a name="FN141A" id= + "FN141A"></a><a href="#FN141">[141]</a></sup> but the proposed operations were delayed + till a much later date, by a circumstance which clearly shows the public nature of the + premises, and that the lease obtained conferred no exclusive right of occupation. The + question of a union with Scotland, for which King James was very anxious, was at the + time being agitated, and commissioners having been appointed to discuss it, this very + house was placed at their disposal for their meetings. Consequently the <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span>summer and autumn passed + without any farther steps being taken by the conspirators.</p> + + <p>At last, in December, they were free to take in hand the extraordinary scheme they + had matured. This was, starting from a cellar of Percy's house,<sup><a name="FN142A" + id="FN142A"></a><a href="#FN142">[142]</a></sup> to dig thence an underground mine to + the foundations of the Parliament House, and through them; and then to construct + within, beneath the Peers' Chamber itself, a "concavity" large enough to contain the + amount of powder requisite for their purpose. On December 11th, 1604, they commenced + operations,<sup><a name="FN143A" id="FN143A"></a><a href="#FN143">[143]</a></sup> and + in a fortnight, that is by Christmas, they had tunnelled from their starting-point to + the wall they had to breach; and that this first operation was of no small magnitude, + especially for men who had never before handled pick or shovel,<sup><a name="FN144A" + id="FN144A"></a><a href="#FN144">[144]</a></sup> is shown by the fact that what they + contrived to do in so short a time was quoted as evidence of the extraordinary zeal + they displayed in their nefarious enterprise.<sup><a name="FN145A" id= + "FN145A"></a><a href="#FN145">[145]</a></sup> Having rested a little, for <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span>the Christmas holidays, they + began upon the wall, which presented an unexpected obstacle. They found that it was not + only "very hard to beat through," but, moreover, nine feet thick, though since, as we + shall see, they never penetrated to the other side, it is not clear how they were able + to measure it.<sup><a name="FN146A" id="FN146A"></a><a href="#FN146">[146]</a></sup> Up + to this point but five persons had engaged in the work, Catesby, Percy, Thomas Winter, + John Wright, and Faukes. In consequence however of the difficulties now experienced, + Keyes was called in to their aid. He had already been initiated in the Plot, and + appointed to take charge of the powder, which was being accumulated and stored in a + house hired for the purpose across the Thames, at Lambeth. It was therefore necessary + to bring over the powder with him, which amounted at this time to twenty barrels, and + was placed either in Percy's lodging itself, or in an outhouse belonging to it. About + the same time Christopher Wright was also initiated and took his share of the + labour.<sup><a name="FN147A" id="FN147A"></a><a href="#FN147">[147]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The gang thus composed laboured upon the wall from the beginning of January, 1604-5, + to the middle of March,<sup><a name="FN148A" id="FN148A"></a><a href= + "#FN148">[148]</a></sup> by which time they had succeeded in getting <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span>only half way through. While + the others worked, Faukes stood on sentry to warn them of any danger.</p> + + <p>Meanwhile, it must be asked how proceedings so remarkable could have escaped the + notice, not only of the government, but of the entire neighbourhood. This, it must be + remembered, was most populous. There were people living in the very building, a part of + which sheltered the conspirators. Around, were thickly clustered the dwellings of the + keeper of the Wardrobe, auditors and tellers of the Exchequer, and other such + officials.<sup><a name="FN149A" id="FN149A"></a><a href="#FN149">[149]</a></sup> There + were tradespeople and workmen constantly employed close to the spot where the work was + going on; while the public character of the place makes it impossible to suppose that + tenants such as Percy and his friends, who were little better than lodgers, could claim + the exclusive use of anything beyond the rooms they rented—even when allowed the + use of these—or could shut against the neighbours and visitors in general the + precincts of so much frequented a spot.</p> + + <p>How, then, did they dispose of the mass of soil dug out in making a tunnel through + which barrels and hogsheads were to be conveyed? No man who has had practical + experience of the unexpected quantity of earth which comes out of the most <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span>insignificant excavation, + will be likely to rest satisfied with the explanation officially given, that it was + sufficiently concealed by being hidden beneath the turf in the little garden + adjoining.<sup><a name="FN150A" id="FN150A"></a><a href="#FN150">[150]</a></sup> What, + moreover, was done with the great stones that came out of the foundations? Of these + there must have been on hand at least some sixty cubic feet, probably much more, and + they, at any rate, can scarcely have been stowed away beneath the turf.</p> + + <p>What, above all, of the noise made during the space of a couple of months, in + assaulting a wall "very hard to beat through"? It is a matter of common observation how + sound travels in the ground, and every stroke of the pick upon the stone must have been + distinctly heard for more than a hundred yards all around, constituting a public + nuisance. Meanwhile, not only were there people living close by on every side, but men + were constantly at work right over the heads of the diggers, and only a few feet from + them: yet we are required to believe that neither these nor any others had any notion + that anything unusual was going on.</p> + + <p>Neither is it easy to understand how these amateurs contrived to do so much without + a catastrophe. To make a tunnel through soft earth is a very delicate operation, + replete with unlooked-for difficulties. To shore up the roof and sides there must, + moreover, have been required a large quantity of the "framed timber" of which Speed + tells us, and the provision and importation of this must have been almost as hard to + keep dark as the exportation of the earth and stones. A <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span>still more critical operation is that of + meddling with the foundations of a house—especially of an old and heavy + structure—which a professional craftsman would not venture upon except with + extreme care, and the employment of many precautions of which these light-hearted + adventurers knew nothing. Yet, recklessly breaking their way out of one building, and + to a large extent into another, they appear to have occasioned neither crack nor + settlement in either.</p> + + <p>We are by no means at the end of our difficulties. According to the tale told by + Faukes,<sup><a name="FN151A" id="FN151A"></a><a href="#FN151">[151]</a></sup> all the + seven miners "lay in Percy's house," never showing themselves while the work was in + progress. This circumstance, to say nothing of the storage of powder barrels and + timber, seems to imply that the premises were spacious and commodious. We learn, + however, on the unimpeachable evidence of Mrs. Whynniard's servant,<sup><a name= + "FN152A" id="FN152A"></a><a href="#FN152">[152]</a></sup> that the house afforded + accommodation only for one person at a time, so that when Percy came there to spend the + night, Faukes, who passed for his man, had to lodge out. This suggests another + question. Percy's pretext for laying in so much fuel was that he meant to bring up his + wife to live there. But how could this be under such conditions?</p> + + <p>Still more serious is another problem. When the mining operations were commenced, in + December, 1604, Parliament was appointed to meet on the 7th of February following, by + which time, as is evident, the preparations of the conspirators could not have been + completed. While they were working, however, news came that the session was to be + postponed till October. <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg + 68]</a></span>This information the conspirators appear to have received quite casually + before Christmas, for it is said that on the strength of it, they thought they could + afford to take a holiday.<sup><a name="FN153A" id="FN153A"></a><a href= + "#FN153">[153]</a></sup> Early in January they were again at work,<sup><a name="FN154A" + id="FN154A"></a><a href="#FN154">[154]</a></sup> and they continued their operations + thenceforth, without any circumstance intervening to interrupt or alarm them, of which + we hear anything either from themselves or from subsequent writers. Nevertheless, it is + quite certain that the Lords actually met on February 7th—that is while the + mining operations were going on—and not only went through the ceremony of + prorogation, but transacted some little business besides, Lord Denny being introduced + and his writ of summons read.<sup><a name="FN155A" id="FN155A"></a><a href= + "#FN155">[155]</a></sup> It is equally incomprehensible <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span>that the miners should have known nothing of + so startling an occurrence, or that knowing of it they should never have made the + slightest mention thereof. It is even more difficult to explain how the Peers thus + assembled, and their attendants, could have failed to remark the mine, then actually + open, in premises belonging to themselves, or any suspicious features of earth, stones, + timber, or barrels.</p> + + <p>The difficulties presented by the stubborn nature of the foundation-wall proved + well-nigh insuperable, but, as is observed by Father Greenway,<sup><a name="FN156A" id= + "FN156A"></a><a href="#FN156">[156]</a></sup> one still more grave awaited the diggers + had they succeeded in making their way through. The "concavity" to be excavated within, + to contain the large number of powder barrels required for their purpose, would have + involved engineering work of the most hazardous kind, and heavily laden as the floor + above proved to be, it must, according to all rules of calculation, have collapsed, + when thus undermined. But at this juncture, when the wall had been half pierced, a + circumstance occurred, not less extraordinary than others we have considered, to change + the whole plan of operations.</p> + + <p>All this time, ridiculous as is the supposition, the conspirators appear to have + been ignorant of the existence of the "cellar," and to have fancied that they were + working their way immediately beneath the Chamber of the Peers.<sup><a name="FN157A" + id="FN157A"></a><a href="#FN157">[157]</a></sup> If such a circumstance be <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span>incredible, the consequences + must be borne by the narrative of which it forms an essential feature. That it is + incredible can hardly be questioned. The so-called "cellar," as we have seen, was a + large and conspicuous room above ground. There are reasons for believing that it served + habitually as a passage between the different parts of the palace. It appears certain + that some of the conspirators, Percy in particular, as being one of his Majesty's + pensioners, must have frequently been in the House of Lords itself, and therefore have + known where it was; and clearly men of their position were able to attend there when + they chose.<sup><a name="FN158A" id="FN158A"></a><a href="#FN158">[158]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The manner in which they came at last to discover the "cellar" is thus related by + Mr. Jardine:<sup><a name="FN159A" id="FN159A"></a><a href="#FN159">[159]</a></sup> "One + morning, while working upon the wall, they suddenly heard a rushing noise in a cellar, + nearly above their heads. At first they imagined that they had been discovered; but + Fawkes being despatched to reconnoitre, found that one Bright, to whom the cellar + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span>belonged, was + selling off his coals<sup><a name="FN160A" id="FN160A"></a><a href= + "#FN160">[160]</a></sup> in order to remove, and that the noise proceeded from this + cause. Fawkes <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg + 72]</a></span>carefully surveyed the place, which proved to be a large vault, situated + immediately below the House of Lords, and extremely convenient for the purpose they had + in view.... Finding that the cellar would shortly become vacant, the conspirators + agreed that it should be hired in Percy's name, under the pretext that he wanted it for + his own coals and wood. This was accordingly done, and immediate possession was + obtained."<sup><a name="FN161A" id="FN161A"></a><a href="#FN161">[161]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image8" id="image8"></a><img src="images/image8.png" width="600" height= + "737" alt="CELLAR UNDER HOUSE OF LORDS." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">cellar under house of lords.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>It is obvious that Mr. Bright's men must on this, as presumably upon many previous + occasions, have been at work among the coals, while the miners were hammering at the + foundations beneath them, and yet have been as little aware of what was going on as + were the others of the existence of the "cellar." It must, farther, be noted that the + hiring of this receptacle was, in fact, by no means so easy a matter as the accounts + ordinarily given would lead us to suppose. <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id= + "Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span>Faukes, in the narrative on which the whole history of this + episode has been based, is made to say that he found that the coals were a-selling, and + the cellar was to be let, whereupon Percy went and hired it. Mrs. Whynniard, however, + tells us that the cellar was not to let, and that Bright had not the disposal of the + lease, but one Skinner, and that Percy "laboured very earnestly" before he succeeded in + obtaining it.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image9" id="image9"></a><img src="images/image9.png" width="600" height= + "415" alt= + "VAULT, EAST END OF PAINTED CHAMBER, ERRONEOUSLY STYLED "GUY FAUKES' CELLAR."" + title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">vault, east end of painted + chamber, erroneously styled "guy faukes' cellar."</span></span> + </div> + + <p>But, whatever the circumstances and manner of the transaction, it appears that at + Lady-day, 1605, this chamber came into the hands of those who were to make it so + famous; whereupon, we are told, they resolved to abandon the mine, and use this + ready-made <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg + 74]</a></span>cavity for their purposes. To it, accordingly, they transferred their + powder, the barrels, by subsequent additions, being increased to thirty-six, and the + amount to nine or ten thousand pounds.<sup><a name="FN162A" id="FN162A"></a><a href= + "#FN162">[162]</a></sup> The casks were covered with firewood, 500 faggots and 3,000 + billets being brought in by hired porters and piled up by Faukes, to whose charge, in + his assumed character of Percy's servant, the cellar was committed. It is stated in + Winter's long declaration on this subject,<sup><a name="FN163A" id= + "FN163A"></a><a href="#FN163">[163]</a></sup> that the barrels were thus completely + hidden, "because we might have the house free, to suffer anyone to enter that would," + and we find it mentioned by various writers subsequently, that free ingress was + actually allowed to the public. Thus we read<sup><a name="FN164A" id= + "FN164A"></a><a href="#FN164">[164]</a></sup> of "the deep <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span><span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span>cunning [of the + conspirators] in throwing open the vault, as if there had been nothing to conceal;" + while another writer<sup><a name="FN165A" id="FN165A"></a><a href= + "#FN165">[165]</a></sup> tells us, "The place was hired by Percy; 36 barrels of + gunpowder were lodged in it; the whole covered up with billets and faggots; the doors + of the cellar boldly flung open, and everybody admitted, as though it contained nothing + dangerous." On the top of the barrels were likewise placed "great bars of iron and + massy stones," in order "to make the breach the greater."</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image10" id="image10"></a><img src="images/image10.png" width="600" height= + "407" alt="ARCHES FROM THE "CELLAR" UNDER THE HOUSE OF LORDS." title="" /> + <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">arches from the "cellar" under the house of + lords.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>We may here pause to review the extraordinary story to which we have been listening. + A group of men, known for as dangerous characters as any in England, men, in Cecil's + own words,<sup><a name="FN166A" id="FN166A"></a><a href="#FN166">[166]</a></sup> "spent + in their fortunes," "hunger-starved for innovations," "turbulent spirits," and "fit for + all alterations," take a house within the precincts of a royal palace, and close to the + Upper House of Parliament, dig a mine, hammer away for over two months at the wall, + acquire and bring in four tons of gunpowder, storing it in a large and conspicuous + chamber immediately beneath that of the Peers, and covering it with an amount of fuel + sufficient for a royal establishment—and meanwhile those responsible for the + government of the country have not even the faintest suspicion of any possible danger. + "Never," it is said,<sup><a name="FN167A" id="FN167A"></a><a href= + "#FN167">[167]</a></sup> "was treason more secret, or ruin more apparently inevitable," + while the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg + 77]</a></span>Secretary of State himself declared<sup><a name="FN168A" id= + "FN168A"></a><a href="#FN168">[168]</a></sup> that such ruin was averted only by the + direct interposition of Heaven, in a manner nothing short of miraculous.</p> + + <p>It must be remembered that the government thus credited with childlike and culpable + simplicity, was probably the most suspicious and inquisitive that ever held power in + this country, for its tenure whereof it trusted mainly to the elaborate efficiency of + its intelligence department. Of a former secretary, Walsingham, Parsons wrote that he + "spent infinite upon spyery,"<sup><a name="FN169A" id="FN169A"></a><a href= + "#FN169">[169]</a></sup> and there can be no doubt that his successor, now in office, + had studied his methods to good purpose. "He," according to a panegyrist,<sup><a name= + "FN170A" id="FN170A"></a><a href="#FN170">[170]</a></sup> "was his craft's master in + foreign intelligence and for domestic affairs," who could tell at any moment what ships + there were in every port of Spain, their burdens, their equipment, and their + destination. We are told<sup><a name="FN171A" id="FN171A"></a><a href= + "#FN171">[171]</a></sup> that he could discover the most secret business transacted in + the Papal Court before it was known to the Catholics in England. He could intercept + letters written from Paris to Brussels, or from Rome to Naples.<sup><a name="FN172A" + id="FN172A"></a><a href="#FN172">[172]</a></sup> What was his activity at home is + sufficiently evidenced by the reports furnished by his numerous agents concerning + everything done throughout the country, in particular by Recusants; whereof we shall + see more, in connection with this particular <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" + id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span>affair. That those so remarkably wide-awake in regard of + all else should have been blind and deaf to what was passing at their own doors appears + altogether incredible.</p> + + <p>More especially do difficulties connect themselves with the gunpowder itself. Of + this, according to the lowest figure given us, there were over four tons.<sup><a name= + "FN173A" id="FN173A"></a><a href="#FN173">[173]</a></sup> How, we may ask, could half a + dozen men, "notorious Recusants," and bearing, moreover, such a character as we have + heard, without attracting any notice, and no question being asked, possess themselves + of such a quantity of so dangerous a material?<sup><a name="FN174A" id= + "FN174A"></a><a href="#FN174">[174]</a></sup> How large was the amount may be estimated + from the fact that <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg + 79]</a></span>it was more than a quarter of what, in 1607, was delivered from the royal + store, for all purposes, and was equal to what was thought sufficient for Dover Castle, + while there was no more in the four fortresses of Arcliffe, Walmer, Deal, and Camber + together.<sup><a name="FN175A" id="FN175A"></a><a href="#FN175">[175]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The twenty barrels first procured were first, as we have seen, stored beyond the + Thames, at Lambeth, whence they had to be ferried across the river, hauled up the much + frequented Parliament Stairs, carried down Parliament Place, as busy a quarter as any + in the city of Westminster, and into the building adjoining the Parliament House, or + the "cellar" beneath the same. All this, we are to suppose, without attracting + attention or remark.<sup><a name="FN176A" id="FN176A"></a><a href= + "#FN176">[176]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span></p> + + <p>The conspirators, while making these material preparations, were likewise busy in + settling their plan of action when the intended blow should have been struck. It was by + no means their intention to attempt a revolution. Their quarrel was purely personal + with King James, his Council, and his Parliament, and, these being removed, they + desired to continue the succession in its legitimate course, and to seat on the throne + the nearest heir who might be available for the purpose; placing the new sovereign, + however, under such tutelage as should insure the inauguration of a right course of + policy. The details of the scheme were of as lunatic a character as the rest of the + business. The confederates would have wished to possess themselves of Prince Henry, the + king's eldest son; <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg + 81]</a></span>but as he would probably accompany his father to the opening of + Parliament, and so perish, their desire was to get hold of his brother, the Duke of + York, afterwards Charles I., then but five years old. It was, however, possible that he + too might go to Parliament, and otherwise it might not improbably be impossible to get + possession of him: in which case they were prepared to be satisfied with the Princess + Elizabeth,<sup><a name="FN177A" id="FN177A"></a><a href="#FN177">[177]</a></sup> or + even with her infant sister Mary, for whom, as being English born, a special claim + might be urged.</p> + + <p>Such was the project in general. When we come to details, we are confronted, as + might be anticipated, with statements impossible to reconcile. We are + told,<sup><a name="FN178A" id="FN178A"></a><a href="#FN178">[178]</a></sup> that Percy + undertook to seize and carry off Duke Charles; and again,<sup><a name="FN179A" id= + "FN179A"></a><a href="#FN179">[179]</a></sup> that, despairing of being able to lay + hands upon him, they resolved "to serve themselves with the Lady Elizabeth," and that + Percy was one of those who made arrangements for seizing her;<sup><a name="FN180A" id= + "FN180A"></a><a href="#FN180">[180]</a></sup> and again, that having learnt that Prince + Henry was not to go to the House, they determined to surprise him, "and leave the young + Duke alone;"<sup><a name="FN181A" id="FN181A"></a><a href="#FN181">[181]</a></sup> and + once more, that they never entered into any consultation or formed any project whatever + as to the succession.<sup><a name="FN182A" id="FN182A"></a><a href= + "#FN182">[182]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span></p> + + <p>Still more serious are the contradictions on another point. We are told, on the one + hand, that a proclamation was drawn up for the inauguration of the new + sovereign—whoever this was<sup><a name="FN183A" id="FN183A"></a><a href= + "#FN183">[183]</a></sup>—and, on the other, that the associates were resolved not + to avow the explosion to be their work until they should see how the country took it, + or till they had gathered a sufficient force,<sup><a name="FN184A" id= + "FN184A"></a><a href="#FN184">[184]</a></sup> and accordingly that they had no more + than a project of a proclamation to be issued in due season. But, again, it is + said<sup><a name="FN185A" id="FN185A"></a><a href="#FN185">[185]</a></sup> that Catesby + on his way out of town, after the event, was to proclaim the new monarch at Charing + Cross, though it is equally hard to understand, either how he was to know which of the + plans had succeeded, and who that monarch was to be,—whether a king or a + queen,—or what effect such proclamation by an obscure individual like himself was + expected to produce; or how this, or indeed any item in the programme was compatible + with the incognito of the actors in the great tragedy.</p> + + <p>Amid this hopeless tangle one point alone is perfectly clear. Whatever was the + scheme, it was absolutely insane, and could by no possibility have succeeded. As Mr. + Gardiner says:<sup><a name="FN186A" id="FN186A"></a><a href="#FN186">[186]</a></sup> + "With the advantage of having an infant sovereign in their hands, with a little money + and a few horses, these sanguine dreamers fancied that they would have the whole of + England at their feet."</p> + + <p>Such is in outline the authorized version of the history concerning what Father John + Gerard styles <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg + 84]</a></span><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg + 83]</a></span>"this preposterous Plot of Powder;" and preposterous it undoubtedly + appears to be in more senses than he intended. It is, in the first place, almost + impossible to believe that the important and dramatic episode of the mine ever, in + fact, occurred. We have seen something of the difficulties against accepting this part + of the story, which the circumstantial evidence suggests. When, on the other hand, we + ask upon what testimony it rests, it is a surprise to find that for so prominent and + striking an incident we are wholly dependent upon two documents, published by the + government, a confession of Thomas Winter and another of Faukes, both of which present + features rendering them in the highest degree suspicious. Amongst the many confessions + and declarations made by the conspirators in general, and these individuals in + particular, these two alone describe the mining operations.<sup><a name="FN187A" id= + "FN187A"></a><a href="#FN187">[187]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c8"> + <a name="image11" id="image11"></a><img src="images/image11.png" width="510" height= + "800" alt= + "CELL IN STAIRCASE TURRET, S.E. CORNER, PAINTED CHAMBER, OFTEN CALLED "GUY FAUKES' CELL."" + title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">cell in staircase turret, s.e. + corner, painted chamber, often called "guy faukes' cell."</span></span> + </div> + + <p>On the other hand, it is somewhat startling to find no less a person than the Earl + of Salisbury himself ignorant or oblivious of so remarkable a circumstance. In Thomas + Winter's lodging was found the agreement between Percy and Ferrers for the lease of the + house, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span>which was + taken, as has been said, in May, 1604. This is still preserved, and has been endorsed + by Cecil, "The bargaine between Percy and Ferrers for the bloody sellar...." But this + contract had nothing to do with the "bloody sellar," which was not rented till ten + months later. Again, writing November 9th, 1605, to Cornwallis and Edmondes, Cecil + says: "This Percy had about a year and a half ago hired a part of Vyniard's house in + the old Palace, from whence he had access into this vault to lay his wood and coal, and + as it seemeth now [had] taken this place of purpose to work some mischief in a fit + time." When this was written the premises had been for four days in the hands of the + government. It is clearly impossible that the remains of the mine, had they existed, + should not have been found, and equally so that Cecil should not have alluded to the + overwhelming evidence they afforded as to the intention of Percy and his associates to + "work some mischief," but should, again, have connected the tenancy of the house only + with the "cellar."</p> + + <p>It will, moreover, be found by investigators that when exceptional stress is laid on + any point by Sir E. Coke, the Attorney General, a <i>prima facie</i> case against the + genuine nature of the evidence in regard of that point is thereby established. In his + speech on the trial of the conspirators we find him declaring that, "If the cellar had + not been hired, the mine work could hardly, or not at all, have been discovered, for + the mine was neither found nor suspected until the danger was past, and the capital + offenders apprehended, and by themselves, upon examination, confessed." That is to say, + the government could not, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg + 86]</a></span>though provided with information that there was a powder-mine under the + Parliament House, have discovered this extraordinary piece of engineering; and + moreover, after its abandonment, the traces of the excavation were so artfully hidden + as to elude observation till the prisoners drew attention to them. Such assertions + cannot possibly be true; but they might serve to meet the objection that no one had + seen the mine.</p> + + <p>We likewise find that in his examination of November 5th, Faukes is made to say: "He + confesseth that about Christmas last [1604], he brought in the nighttime Gunpowder + <i>to the cellar under the upper house of Parliament</i>," that is some three months + before the cellar was hired. Moreover, the words italicised have been added as an + interlineation, apparently by Cecil himself. Evidently when this was done the mine was + still undiscovered.</p> + + <p>Yet more remarkable is the fact that it would appear to have remained undiscovered + ever afterwards, and that no marks seem to have been left upon the wall which had been + so roughly handled. It is certainly impossible to find any record that such traces were + observed when the building was demolished, though they could scarcely have failed to + attract attention and interest. On this subject we have the important evidence of Mr. + William Capon, who carefully examined every detail connected with the old palace, and + evidently had the opportunity of studying the foundations of the House of Lords when, + in 1823, that building was removed.<sup><a name="FN188A" id="FN188A"></a><a href= + "#FN188">[188]</a></sup> He does, indeed, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id= + "Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span>mention what he conceives to be the traces of the + conspirators' work, of which he gives the following description:</p> + + <p>"Adjoining the south end of the Cellar, or more properly the ancient Kitchen, to the + west, was a small room separated only by a stone doorway, with a pointed head, and with + very substantial masonry joined to the older walls.... At the North side [of this] + there had been an opening, a doorway of very solid thick stonemasonry, through which + was a way seemingly forced through by great violence.... In 1799 it was asserted that + this was always understood to have been the place where the conspirators broke into the + vault which adjoined that called Guy Vaux's cellar."<sup><a name="FN189A" id= + "FN189A"></a><a href="#FN189">[189]</a></sup></p> + + <p>But against such a supposition there are three fatal objections. (1) This places the + conspirators on the wrong side of the house, for they most certainly worked from the + east, or river side, not from the west.<sup><a name="FN190A" id="FN190A"></a><a href= + "#FN190">[190]</a></sup> (2) It makes the mine above ground instead of below. (3) The + conspirators never broke into the cellar at all, but hired it in the ordinary way of + business.</p> + + <p>Such considerations as the above may well make us sceptical in regard to the mine, + and if this element of the story, upon which so much stress has always been laid, prove + to be untrustworthy, it must needs follow that grave suspicion will be cast upon the + rest.</p> + + <p>There are, likewise, various problems in connection with the "cellar," especially as + concerns the means of ingress to it, and its consequent privacy or publicity.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span></p> + + <p>(<i>a</i>) Faukes says (November 6th, 1605) that about the middle of Lent of that + year Percy caused "a new dore" to be made into it, "that he might have a neerer way out + of his own house into the cellar."</p> + + <p>This seems to imply that Percy took the cellar for his firewood when there was no + convenient communication between it and his house. Moreover it is not very easy to + understand how a tenant under such conditions as his was allowed at discretion to knock + doors through the walls of a royal palace. Neither did the landlady say anything of + this door-making, when detailing what she knew about Percy's proceedings.</p> + + <p>(<i>b</i>) In some notes by Sir E. Coke,<sup><a name="FN191A" id= + "FN191A"></a><a href="#FN191">[191]</a></sup> it is said: "The powder was first brought + into Percy's house, and lay there in a low room new built, and could not have been + conveyed into the cellar by the old door but that all the street must have seen it; and + therefore he caused a new door out of his house into the cellar to be made, where + before there had been a grate of iron."</p> + + <p>This, it must be confessed, looks very like an afterthought to explain away a + difficulty, but failing to do so. When the door is said to have been made, the powder + was already on the premises, having been brought there in sight of the whole street and + the river. It could hardly, in so small a tenement, escape the observation of the + workmen,<sup><a name="FN192A" id="FN192A"></a><a href="#FN192">[192]</a></sup> while + the operations of these latter in breaking through the wall <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span>would have served yet + farther to attract the attention of the neighbourhood.</p> + + <p>(<i>c</i>) We are told by Faukes and others, that either he or Percy always kept the + key, and that marks were made to indicate whether anyone had entered the place in their + absence.</p> + + <p>(<i>d</i>) On the other hand, to say nothing of Winter's declaration that the + confederates so arranged as to leave the cellar free for all to enter who would, Lord + Salisbury informed Sir Thomas Parry<sup><a name="FN193A" id="FN193A"></a><a href= + "#FN193">[193]</a></sup> that the captors of Faukes entered through "another door," + which clearly did not require to be opened by him; while as to the ordinary door, + whichever this was, the "King's Book" itself plainly intimates, in the account of the + chamberlain's visit, that Whynniard, the landlord, was able to open it when he + chose.</p> + + <p>The "other door" spoken of by Cecil, a most important feature of the chamber, is + nowhere else mentioned.<sup><a name="FN194A" id="FN194A"></a>[<a href= + "#FN194">194]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It appears certain that the conspirators really had a plot in hand, that they + fancied themselves to be about to strike a great blow, and that by means of gunpowder; + but what was the precise nature of their plans and preparations it is not so easy to + determine. Farther discussion of these particulars must be deferred to a later chapter. + Meanwhile, according to the accepted history, when they had stored their powder there + was nothing more to do but to await the assembling <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span>of the intended victims. Parliament stood + prorogued till October 3rd, and was afterwards further adjourned till the fateful 5th + of November. That they might not excite suspicion, the confederates separated, most of + them retiring to their country seats, and Faukes going over to Flanders.<sup><a name= + "FN195A" id="FN195A"></a><a href="#FN195">[195]</a></sup> In his absence Percy kept the + key of the cellar, and, according to Faukes,<sup><a name="FN196A" id= + "FN196A"></a><a href="#FN196">[196]</a></sup> laid in more powder and wood while he + himself was absent.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg + 90]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c9"> + <a name="image12" id="image12"></a><img src="images/image12.png" width="536" height= + "800" alt="THE POWDER PLOT. II." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">the powder plot. ii.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>It is not easy to understand what became of the cellar during this long interval, + and apparently it was left in great measure, with its compromising contents, to take + care of itself, for Percy, amongst other places, went with Catesby to Bath to take the + waters.<sup><a name="FN197A" id="FN197A"></a><a href="#FN197">[197]</a></sup> If the + premises were of so public a nature as the testimony of Winter and others would imply, + it appears impossible that they should have remained all this time sealed up, or that + these astute and crafty plotters should with a light heart have ignored the probability + that they would be visited and inspected. As Father Greenway observes,<sup><a name= + "FN198A" id="FN198A"></a><a href="#FN198">[198]</a></sup> it can hardly be supposed + that the landlord<sup><a name="FN199A" id="FN199A"></a><a href="#FN199">[199]</a></sup> + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span>had not a + duplicate key, while Cecil himself, in his letter to Sir Thomas Parry, plainly + indicates that access to the cellar could freely be procured independently of the + conspirators. We can only say that the conduct of the confederates in this particular + appears to have been quite in keeping with their method of conspiring secretly as we + have already seen it, and undoubtedly one more difficulty is thus opposed to the + supposition that their enterprise was chiefly dangerous on account of the clandestine + and dexterous manner in which it was conducted.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN129" id="FN129"></a><a href="#FN129A">[129]</a></sup> + The name "old House of Lords" is somewhat ambiguous, being variously applicable to + three different buildings:</p> + + <p class="ni">(i.) That here described, which continued to be used till the Irish + Union, <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 1800.</p> + + <p class="ni">(ii.) The "Court of Requests," or "White Hall," used from 1800 till the + fire of 1834.</p> + + <p class="ni">(iii.) The "Painted Chamber," which, having been repaired after the + said fire, became the place of assembly for the Lords, as did the Court of Requests + for the Commons.</p> + + <p>The original House of Lords was demolished in 1823 by Sir John Soane, who on its + site erected his Royal Gallery. (See Brayley and Britton, <i>History of the Palace of + Westminster</i>.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN130" id="FN130"></a><a href="#FN130A">[130]</a></sup> + The authority for this is the Earl of Northampton, who at Father Garnet's trial + mentioned that it was so stated in ancient records. Remains of a buttery hatch in the + south wall confirmed his assertion.</p> + + <p>The foundations of the building were believed to date from the time of Edward the + Confessor, and the style of architecture of the superstructure assigned it to the + early part of the thirteenth century, as likewise the "Prince's Chamber."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN131" id="FN131"></a><a href="#FN131A">[131]</a></sup> + Brayley and Britton, <i>History of the Palace of Westminster</i>, p. 421; J. T. + Smith, <i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>, p. 39 (where illustrations will be found); + <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i>, July, 1800, p. 626.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN132" id="FN132"></a><a href="#FN132A">[132]</a></sup> + It was here that the death warrant of Charles I. was signed.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN133" id="FN133"></a><a href="#FN133A">[133]</a></sup> + An old print (which states that it is taken from "a painted print in the Cottonian + library,") representing the two Houses assembled in presence of Queen Elizabeth, has + windows on both sides. The same plate, with the figure of the sovereign alone + changed, was made to do duty likewise for a Parliament of James I. By Hollar's time + (1640-77) the windows had been blocked up and the tapestry hung.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN134" id="FN134"></a><a href="#FN134A">[134]</a></sup> + Cecil wrote to Cornwallis, Edmondes, and others, November 9th, 1605, "This Piercey + had a bout a year and a half a goe hyred a parte of Vyniards house in the old + Palace," which appears to be Mr. Hepworth Dixon's sole authority for styling the + tenement "Vinegar House."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN135" id="FN135"></a><a href="#FN135A">[135]</a></sup> + See Appendix E, <i>Site of Percy's house</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN136" id="FN136"></a><a href="#FN136A">[136]</a></sup> + Evidence of Mrs. Whynniard, November 7th, 1605. Epsley is evidently the same person + as Hoppisley, who was examined on the 23rd of the same month.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN137" id="FN137"></a><a href="#FN137A">[137]</a></sup> + Birch, <i>Historical View</i>, p. 227.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN138" id="FN138"></a><a href="#FN138A">[138]</a></sup> + <i>Historie</i>, p. 1231.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN139" id="FN139"></a><a href="#FN139A">[139]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Treason, Harleian Miscellany</i>, iii. 121.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN140" id="FN140"></a><a href="#FN140A">[140]</a></sup> + At his first examination, November 5th 1605, Faukes declared that he had not been + sure the king would come to the Parliament House on that day, and that his purpose + was to have blown it up whenever his Majesty was there.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN141" id="FN141"></a><a href="#FN141A">[141]</a></sup> + The agreement between Percy and Ferrers is in the Record Office (<i>Gunpowder Plot + Book</i>, 1.) and is endorsed by Cecil, "The bargaine ... for the bloody sellar." + Upon this there will be more to remark later.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN142" id="FN142"></a><a href="#FN142A">[142]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 42.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN143" id="FN143"></a><a href="#FN143A">[143]</a></sup> + The 11th of December, O.S., was at that period the shortest day, which circumstance + suggested to Sir E. Coke, on the trial of the conspirators, one of his characteristic + facetiæ; he bade his hearers note "That it was in the entring of the Sun into + the Tropick of Capricorn, when they began their Mine; noting that by Mining they + should descend, and by Hanging, ascend."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN144" id="FN144"></a><a href="#FN144A">[144]</a></sup> + "Gentlemen not accustomed to labour or to be pioneers."—Goodman, <i>Court of + King James</i>, p. 103.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN145" id="FN145"></a><a href="#FN145A">[145]</a></sup> + "The Moles that first underwent these underminings were all grounded Schollers of the + Romish Schoole, and such earnest Labourers in their Vault of Villany, that by + Christmas Eve they had brought the worke under an entry, unto the Wall of the + Parliament House, underpropping still as they went the Earth with their framed + Timber."—Speed, <i>Historie</i>, p. 1232 (pub. 1611).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN146" id="FN146"></a><a href="#FN146A">[146]</a></sup> + In Barlow's <i>Gunpowder Treason</i> these foundations are stated to have been three + ells thick, <i>i.e.</i>, eleven and a quarter feet. <i>Harleian Miscellany</i>, iii. + 122.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN147" id="FN147"></a><a href="#FN147A">[147]</a></sup> + See Appendix F, <i>The enrolment of the Conspirators</i>, for the discrepancies as to + dates. T. Winter (November 23rd, 1605) says that the powder was laid "in Mr. Percy's + house;" Faukes, "in a low Room new builded."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN148" id="FN148"></a><a href="#FN148A">[148]</a></sup> + There is, as usual, hopeless contradiction between the two witnesses upon whom, as + will be seen, we wholly depend for this portion of the story. Faukes (November 17th, + 1605) makes the mining operations terminate at Candlemas. T. Winter (November 23rd) + says that they went on to "near Easter" (March 31st). The date of hiring the + "cellar," was about Lady Day (March 25th).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN149" id="FN149"></a><a href="#FN149A">[149]</a></sup> + The buildings of the dissolved College of St. Stephen, comprising those around the + House of Lords, were granted by Edward VI. to Sir Ralph Lane. They reverted to the + crown under Elizabeth, and were appropriated as residences for the auditors and + tellers of the Exchequer. The locality became so populous that in 1606 it was + forbidden to erect more houses.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN150" id="FN150"></a><a href="#FN150A">[150]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 48.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN151" id="FN151"></a><a href="#FN151A">[151]</a></sup> + November 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN152" id="FN152"></a><a href="#FN152A">[152]</a></sup> + November 7th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN153" id="FN153"></a><a href="#FN153A">[153]</a></sup> + Winter says: "... We heard that the Parliament should be anew adjourned until after + Michaelmas; upon which tidings we broke off both discourse and working until after + Christmas" (November 23rd, 1605).</p> + + <p>Lingard writes, "When a fortnight had thus been devoted to uninterrupted labour, + Faukes informed his associates that the Parliament was prorogued from the 7th of + February to the 3rd of October. They immediately separated to spend the Christmas + holidays at their respective homes."—<i>History</i>, vii. 47 (ed. 1883).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN154" id="FN154"></a><a href="#FN154A">[154]</a></sup> + Faukes, as has been said, makes the work upon the wall terminate at Candlemas. Winter + (<i>ut sup.</i>) says that they brought over the powder at Candlemas, that is, after + they had been some time engaged upon the wall, and found the need of the assistance + of Keyes.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN155" id="FN155"></a><a href="#FN155A">[155]</a></sup> + <i>Lord's Journals</i> "A<sup>o</sup> 1604(5) 2 Jac.—Memorandum quod hodierno + die, septimo die Februarii, A<sup>o</sup> Regis ñri Jacobi, <i>viz.</i> + Angliae (etc.) 2<sup>ndo</sup>, & Scotiae 38<sup>o</sup>, in quem diem prorogatum + fuerat hoc praesens parliamentum, convenere Proceres tam Spirituales quam Temporales, + quorum nomina subscribuntur."</p> + + <p>Then follow twenty-nine names, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, Lords + Ellesmere (<i>Chancellor</i>), Dorset (<i>Treasurer</i>), Nottingham + (<i>Admiral</i>), Suffolk (<i>Chamberlain</i>), Northumberland, Cranborne (Cecil), + Northampton, etc. It is noted "Lords Montagu, Petre, and Gerard [all three Catholics] + were present, though they were none of the Commissioners."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN156" id="FN156"></a><a href="#FN156A">[156]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i> (Stonyhurst MSS.), fol. 44 b.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN157" id="FN157"></a><a href="#FN157A">[157]</a></sup> + This absurd supposition is obviously implied by Faukes (November 17th, 1605), and T. + Winter (November 23rd), in the only two accounts furnished by any of the conspirators + wherein the episode of the mine is mentioned. In Barlow's <i>Gunpowder Treason</i> + (<i>Harleian Miscellany</i>, iii. 123) it is expressly stated that the confederates + "came to the knowledge of the vault" only on the occasion now detailed. Tierney says + (Dodd's <i>Church History</i>, iv. 45, note): "At this moment an accidental noise ... + first acquainted them with the existence of the cellar."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN158" id="FN158"></a><a href="#FN158A">[158]</a></sup> + On the 3rd of October following, Thomas Winter was sent to be present at the ceremony + of prorogation, and to watch the demeanour of the assembled peers.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN159" id="FN159"></a><a href="#FN159A">[159]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 55. This account is based almost entirely on that of + Faukes, November 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN160" id="FN160"></a><a href="#FN160A">[160]</a></sup> + In his Italian version of Father Gerard's history, Father Greenway interpolates the + following note: "Questi non erano carboni di legno, ma una sorte di pietra negra, la + quale come carbone abrugia et fa un fuogo bellissimo et ottimo" (fol. 44 b).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN161" id="FN161"></a><a href= + "#FN161A">[161]</a></sup></p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"These Pioneers through Piercies chamber brought<br /> + Th' exhausted earth, great baskets full of clay;<br /> + Thereby t' have made a mighty concave vau't,<br /> + And of the house the ground worke tooke away:<br /> + <span class="c10">But then at last an obstacle they finde,</span><br /> + <span class="c10">Which to remove proud Piercy casts in 's mind.</span><br /> + A thick stone wall their passage then did let;<br /> + Whereby they cou'd not finish their intent.<br /> + Then forthwith Piercy did a sellar get,<br /> + Under that sacred house for yearly rent:<br /> + <span class="c10">Feigning to fill 't with Char coal, Wood, & + Beere,</span><br /> + <span class="c10">From all suspect themselves to cloake & cleere."</span></p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="right"><span class="smcap">John Vicars</span>, <i>Mischeefes + Mysterie</i></p> + + <p>This remarkable poem, published 1617, is a much expanded translation of <i>Pietas + Pontificia</i> (in Latin hexameter verse) by Francis Herring, which appeared in + 1606.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN162" id="FN162"></a><a href="#FN162A">[162]</a></sup> + On this point we are furnished with more than the usual amount of variety as to + details. Cecil, writing to the ambassadors (Cornwallis, Edmondes, etc.), says there + were "two hodgsheads and some 30 small barrels." The King's <i>Discourse</i> mentions + 36 barrels. Barclay (<i>Conspiratio Anglicana</i>) says there were over 9,000 lb. of + powder, in 32 barrels, and that one of extra size had been placed under the throne, + for treason could not without dread assail Majesty even when unarmed. The indictment + of the conspirators named 30 barrels and 4 hogsheads. Sir E. Coke always said 36 + barrels. Barlow's <i>Gunpowder Treason</i> makes the extraordinary statement, + frequently reproduced, that "to the 20 Barrels of Powder laid in at first, they added + in July 20 more, and at last made up the number Thirty-six." Faukes (November 5th) + said that of the powder "some was put in hoggesheads, some in Barrels, and some in + firkins." Faukes also says that the powder was conveyed to the place in hampers. John + Chamberlain, writing to Dudley Carleton, November 7th, 1605, says it was carried in + satchels. Barlow (<i>ut sup.</i>) quotes the amount as 9,000 or 10,000 lb.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN163" id="FN163"></a><a href="#FN163A">[163]</a></sup> + November 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN164" id="FN164"></a><a href="#FN164A">[164]</a></sup> + <i>The Gunpowder Plot</i>, by L., 1805. It seems highly probable that the "cellar" + was used as a public passage.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN165" id="FN165"></a><a href="#FN165A">[165]</a></sup> + Hugh F. Martyndale, <i>A Familiar Analysis of the Calendar of the Church of + England</i> (November 5th). London, Effingham Wilson.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN166" id="FN166"></a><a href="#FN166A">[166]</a></sup> + <i>Letter to Cornwallis and Edmondes</i>, November 9th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN167" id="FN167"></a><a href="#FN167A">[167]</a></sup> + H.F. Martyndale, <i>ut sup.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN168" id="FN168"></a><a href="#FN168A">[168]</a></sup> + Letter to the Ambassadors, <i>ut sup.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN169" id="FN169"></a><a href="#FN169A">[169]</a></sup> + <i>An Advertisement written to a Secretarie</i>, etc. (1592), p. 13.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN170" id="FN170"></a><a href="#FN170A">[170]</a></sup> + Sir R. Naunton, <i>Fragmenta Regalia (Harleian Miscellany</i>, ii. 106).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN171" id="FN171"></a><a href="#FN171A">[171]</a></sup> + Blount to Parsons (Stonyhurst MSS.), <i>Anglia</i>, vi. 64.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN172" id="FN172"></a><a href="#FN172A">[172]</a></sup> + Such letters are found amongst the State Papers.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN173" id="FN173"></a><a href="#FN173A">[173]</a></sup> + The amount, it would seem, cannot have been less than this. A barrel of gunpowder, + containing four firkins, weighed 400 lb., and had the casks in the cellar all been + barrels, in the strict sense of the word, the amount would therefore have exceeded + six tons. Some of these casks, we are told, were small, but some were hogsheads. The + twenty barrels first laid in are described as "whole barrels." (Faukes, January 20th, + 1605-6.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN174" id="FN174"></a><a href="#FN174A">[174]</a></sup> + An interesting illustration of this point is furnished by a strange piece of evidence + furnished by W. Andrew, servant to Sir E. Digby. Sir Everard's office was to organize + the rising in the Midlands, after the catastrophe, but he apparently forgot to supply + himself with powder till the very eve of the appointed day. Andrew averred that on + the night of November 4th, his master secretly asked him to procure some powder in + the neighbouring town, whereupon he asked, "How much? A pound, or half a pound?" Sir + Everard said 200 or 300 lb. Deponent purchased one pound. (Tanner MSS. lxxv. f. 205 + b.)</p> + + <p>One Matthew Batty mentioned Lord Monteagle as having bought gunpowder. + (<i>Ibid.</i> v. 40.)</p> + + <p>In the same collection is a copy of some notes by Sir E. Coke (f. 185 b), in which + the price of the powder discovered is put down as £200, <i>i.e.</i> some + £2,000 of our money.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN175" id="FN175"></a><a href="#FN175A">[175]</a></sup> + Gunpowder was measured by the <i>last</i> = 2,400 lb. (Tomline's <i>Law + Dictionary</i>.) In 1607 there were delivered out of the store 14 lasts and some + cwts. In 1608 the amount in various strong places is entered as: "<i>Dover + Castle</i>, 4 lasts; <i>Arcliffe Bullwark</i>, 1 last; <i>Walmer</i>, 1 last, 8 cwt.; + <i>Deal Castle</i>, 1 last; <i>Sandown Castle</i>, 2 lasts, etc.; <i>Sandgate</i>, 1 + last; <i>Camber</i>, 1 last."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN176" id="FN176"></a><a href="#FN176A">[176]</a></sup> + The position and character of the "cellar" admit of no doubt, as appears from the + testimony of Smith's <i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>, Brayley and Britton's + <i>Ancient Palace of Westminster</i>, and Capon's notes on the same, <i>Vetusta + Monumenta</i>, v. They are, however, inconsistent with some circumstances alleged by + the government. Thus, Sir Everard Digby's complicity with "the worst part" of the + treason, which on several occasions he denied, is held to be established by a + confession of Faukes, which cannot now be found among the State Papers, but which is + mentioned in Sir E. Coke's speech upon Digby's arraignment, and is printed in + Barlow's <i>Gunpowder Treason</i>, p. 68. In Sir E. Coke's version it runs thus: + "Fawkes, then present at the bar, had confessed, that some time before that session, + the said Fawkes being with Digby at his house in the country, about which time there + had fallen much wet, Digby taking Fawkes aside after supper, told him he was much + afraid that the powder in the cellar was grown damp, and that some new must be + provided, lest that should not take fire."</p> + + <p>Seeing, however, that the powder stood above ground, within a most substantial + building, and could be reached by the rain only if this should first flood the + Chamber of the Peers, it does not seem as if the idea of such a danger should have + suggested itself.</p> + + <p>Another interesting point in connection with the "cellar" is that the House of + Lords having subsequently been removed to the Court of Requests, and afterwards to + the Painted Chamber, "Guy Faukes' Cellar" on each occasion accompanied the migration. + From Leigh's <i>New Picture of London</i> we find that in 1824-5, when the Court of + Requests was in use, and the old cellar had completely disappeared, Guy's Cellar was + still shown; while a plate given in Knight's <i>Old England</i>, and elsewhere, + represents a vault under the Painted Chamber, not used as the House of Lords till + after 1832. Such a cellar seems to have been considered a necessary appurtenance of + the House.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN177" id="FN177"></a><a href="#FN177A">[177]</a></sup> + Afterwards the Electress Palatine.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN178" id="FN178"></a><a href="#FN178A">[178]</a></sup> + Gardiner, <i>Hist.</i> i. 245; Lingard, vii. 59; T. Winter, November 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN179" id="FN179"></a><a href="#FN179A">[179]</a></sup> + Faukes, November 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN180" id="FN180"></a><a href="#FN180A">[180]</a></sup> + Harry Morgan, <i>Examination</i> (R.O.), November 12th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN181" id="FN181"></a><a href="#FN181A">[181]</a></sup> + T. Winter, November 23rd and 25th, 1605. As the information about Prince Henry was + alleged to have been communicated by Lord Monteagle, the passage has been mutilated + in the published version to conceal this circumstance.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN182" id="FN182"></a><a href="#FN182A">[182]</a></sup> + Faukes, November 5th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN183" id="FN183"></a><a href="#FN183A">[183]</a></sup> + Sir E. Digby, Barlow's <i>Gunpowder Treason</i>, App. 249.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN184" id="FN184"></a><a href="#FN184A">[184]</a></sup> + Faukes, November 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN185" id="FN185"></a><a href="#FN185A">[185]</a></sup> + Digby, <i>ut sup.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN186" id="FN186"></a><a href="#FN186A">[186]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 239.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN187" id="FN187"></a><a href="#FN187A">[187]</a></sup> + There is also an allusion to the same in the confession of Keyes, November 30th, + 1605; but this document also is of a highly suspicious character. Of the seven + miners, none but these three were taken alive; Catesby, Percy, and the two Wrights + being killed in the field. Strangely enough, though Keyes may be cited as a witness + on this subject, on which his evidence is of such singular importance, the + government, for some purpose of its own, tampered with the confession of Faukes + wherein he is mentioned as one of the excavators, substituting Robert Winter's name + for his, and placing Keyes amongst those "that wrought not in the myne." See + Jardine's remarks on this point, <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 6.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN188" id="FN188"></a><a href="#FN188A">[188]</a></sup> + His detailed notes and plans are given in <i>Vetusta Monumenta</i>, vol. v.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN189" id="FN189"></a><a href="#FN189A">[189]</a></sup> + Page 4.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN190" id="FN190"></a><a href="#FN190A">[190]</a></sup> + See Appendix E, <i>Site of Percy's house</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN191" id="FN191"></a><a href="#FN191A">[191]</a></sup> + Tanner MSS. lxxv. § 185, b.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN192" id="FN192"></a><a href="#FN192A">[192]</a></sup> + Faukes, November 6th, uses the same expression, "a low room new builded," which seems + to imply that this receptacle had been constructed since Percy came into possession + of the house.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN193" id="FN193"></a><a href="#FN193A">[193]</a></sup> + November 6th, 1605. More will be seen of the important document containing this + information.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN194" id="FN194"></a><a href="#FN194A">[194]</a></sup> + According to Smith's plan (<i>sup.</i> p. 59) there were four entrances to the + cellar, none of which can have been Percy's "new dore."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN195" id="FN195"></a><a href="#FN195A">[195]</a></sup> + We are told that Faukes was selected to take charge of the house, and perform other + duties which would bring him into notice, because being unknown in London he was not + likely to excite remark. In his declaration, November 8th, however, he gives as his + reason for going abroad, "lest, being a dangerous man, he should be known and + suspected." It is obvious that in the meantime the cellar must either have been left + in charge of others better known, and therefore more likely to excite suspicion, or + have been left unprotected.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN196" id="FN196"></a><a href="#FN196A">[196]</a></sup> + November 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN197" id="FN197"></a><a href="#FN197A">[197]</a></sup> + Thomas Winter, November 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN198" id="FN198"></a><a href="#FN198A">[198]</a></sup> + F. 66.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN199" id="FN199"></a><a href="#FN199A">[199]</a></sup> + This, as we have heard, was Mr. Whynniard, who unfortunately died very suddenly on + the morning of November 5th, on hearing of the "discovery," evidence of great + importance as to the hiring of the house and "cellar" being thus lost. "As for the + keeper of the parliament house," says Goodman, "who let out the lodgings to Percy, it + is said that as soon as ever he heard of the news what Percy intended, he instantly + fell into a fright and died; so that it could not be certainly known who procured him + the house, or by whose means."—<i>Court of King James</i>, i. 107.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V.</h2> + + <h3>THE GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">Having</span> followed the history of the plotters + and their doings, to the point when everything was ready for action, we have now to + inquire what, in the meantime, those were about for whose destruction such notable + preparations were making, and whether in truth they were, as we are assured, wrapped in + a sense of false security, and altogether unconscious of the signs and tokens that + should have awakened their suspicion and alarm.</p> + + <p>When, by the aid of such evidence as remains to us, we turn to examine the facts of + the case, we discover in them, it must be confessed, no symptoms whatever of supineness + or lethargy. It appears, on the contrary, that throughout the period when the + government are supposed to have been living in a fool's paradise, and tranquilly + assuming that all was well, they were in reality busily at work through their + emissaries and informers, prying into all the doings of the recusant Catholics, + receiving frequent intimation of all that was undertaken, or even projected, and, + apparently, regulating the main features of a treasonable conspiracy, which can have + been no other than the Powder Plot itself, determining, in particular, what individuals + should be implicated therein.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span></p> + + <p>In April, 1604, at the very time when we hear of the Plot as being hatched, a letter + was addressed to Sir Thomas Challoner, an official frequently mixed up with business of + this kind, by one Henry Wright,<sup><a name="FN200A" id="FN200A"></a><a href= + "#FN200">[200]</a></sup> reporting the proceedings of a subordinate agent, by name + Davies, whom he styles a "discoverer,"<sup><a name="FN201A" id="FN201A"></a><a href= + "#FN201">[201]</a></sup> then engaged in working a Catholic treason, with the special + object of incriminating priests. Davies has offered to "set," or mark + down,<sup><a name="FN202A" id="FN202A"></a><a href="#FN202">[202]</a></sup> over + threescore of these, but Wright has told him that so many are not required, and that he + will satisfy his employers if he implicate twenty, provided they be "most principal + Jesuits and seminary priests," and therewithal has given him thirteen or fourteen names + that will serve the required purpose. Davies replies, "that by God's grace he will + absolutely do it ere long."<sup><a name="FN203A" id="FN203A"></a><a href= + "#FN203">[203]</a></sup></p> + + <p>That the treason in question was none other than the Gunpowder Plot there can be no + question, unless indeed we are to say that the authorities were engaged in fabricating + a bogus conspiracy for which there was no foundation whatever in fact. It was not the + way of statesmen of the period, when on the track of sedition, to relinquish the + pursuit till they had sifted it to the bottom, and at this juncture, especially, every + shred of evidence regarding Catholics and their conduct was threshed out to the + uttermost. In consequence, we are able to say with certainty, that <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span>besides the enterprise of + Catesby and his associates, there was no other conspiracy of any kind on foot. We have, + moreover, already seen that the very same point thus by anticipation represented as all + important, is that which after the "discovery" every nerve was strained to establish, + namely, the complicity of the Catholic clergy. If we had no more than this internal + evidence, it would abundantly suffice to assure us that the conspiracy thus sedulously + watched was the same as that miraculously "discovered" a year and a half later.</p> + + <p>But we are not left to such inferences alone. In March, 1606, we find Wright + applying to the minister for a reward on account of his services "in discovering + villainous practices," thus indicating that by this time those which he had been + tracking had been brought to light. More explicit still is a memorial presented to the + king, at a later date, on his behalf. This is entitled—"Touching Wright and his + services performed <i>in the damnable plot of the Powder treason</i>." King James is + reminded that Chief Justice Popham and Sir Thomas Challoner had a hand in the discovery + of the Powder, and this by means of information supplied by Wright, "for two years + space almost" before his Majesty interpreted the famous letter to Lord Monteagle, "like + an angel of God." This information Popham and Challoner had from time to time + communicated to his Majesty, "whose hand Wright hath in testimony of his services in + the matter."<sup><a name="FN204A" id="FN204A"></a><a href="#FN204">[204]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In the same month of April, 1604, was supplied <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span>another piece of information, singularly + interesting and important,<sup><a name="FN205A" id="FN205A"></a><a href= + "#FN205">[205]</a></sup> in which were detailed the particulars of a design amongst the + Catholics at home and abroad. Much, in fact the bulk, of the information given, is + seen, in the light of our present knowledge, to be purely fictitious, affording a good + example of the "sophistications" which, as Cecil himself complained, his agents were + wont to mingle with their intelligence. The design in question was represented as being + of the most serious and secret nature, the papists thinking that it "must now be so + handled and carried as the great cause may lose no reputation, or if any suspicion + should grow in the state, or any come in question therefore, the main point might never + come to light;" the said "main point" being of course the complicity of the Catholic + clergy.</p> + + <p>What invests this document with singular importance is the fact that we hear of it + again. In April, 1606, it was quoted for the benefit of Parliament by the Attorney + General, Sir E. Coke, and explicitly as having reference to the Gunpowder Plot, forming + part of the evidence adduced by him to secure the attainder of persons accused of being + partakers in that treason.<sup><a name="FN206A" id="FN206A"></a><a href= + "#FN206">[206]</a></sup> It thus affords a proof, on the authority of the government + itself, that eighteen months before the conspiracy was "discovered," intelligence + regarding it had been received and was being attended to.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c9"> + <a name="image13" id="image13"></a><img src="images/image13.png" width="536" height= + "800" alt="A VIEW OF THE HOUSE OF PEERS, 1755." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">a view of the house of peers, 1755.</span></span> + </div> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span></p> + + <p>This is, however, by no means the only information of which we find traces. Amongst + the Cecil papers at Hatfield is a letter dated December 20th, 1605, addressed to the + Earl of Salisbury by one Thomas Coe, who claims to have previously forwarded to his + Majesty "the primary intelligence of these late dangerous treasons," upon which + communication the historian Lodge observes,<sup><a name="FN207A" id= + "FN207A"></a><a href="#FN207">[207]</a></sup> "It should seem then that the famous + letter transmitted to James by Lord Monteagle, for the right construction of which that + Prince's penetration hath been so highly extolled by some historians, was not the only + previous intelligence communicated to him of the Gunpowder Treason."</p> + + <p>Meanwhile the officers of the government, in all parts, appear to have been no less + alert than was their wont. On the 9th of January, 1604-5, for instance, Sir Thomas + Parry writes from Paris,<sup><a name="FN208A" id="FN208A"></a><a href= + "#FN208">[208]</a></sup> inclosing a note from an informer at Dieppe, concerning an + English Catholic returning from Italy and Spain with letters for Fathers Garnet and + Oldcorne, and a cipher of three lines for a lawyer at Douay, and although the messenger + has contrived to give him the slip, he is able to send particulars concerning his + personal appearance, and the locality in London where he is likely to be found. On the + 25th of the same month, Cecil replies to Parry<sup><a name="FN209A" id= + "FN209A"></a><a href="#FN209">[209]</a></sup> concerning priests and their doings, and + makes the valuable admission that their proceedings are always known to him by means of + false brethren, though, he adds, these informers always add to their intelligence + "sophistications" of their own, a fact which must not be lost sight of in studying the + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span>reports of such + folk. We hear particularly of informations supplied by the priests Bagshawe and Cecil, + by Captain Turner, Charles Paget, and sundry others.</p> + + <p>At the beginning of October, 1605, we make the acquaintance of another notable + informer. On the first of the month, William Willaston, then engaged on a commission in + France in connection with a proposed commercial treaty, writes to Cecil from + Paris<sup><a name="FN210A" id="FN210A"></a><a href="#FN210">[210]</a></sup> concerning + a Catholic design attributed chiefly to priests and Jesuits, who have assurance that + their friends in England, who are many and of good sort, intend "to kindle a fire in + many corners of our land, and a rebellion in Ireland," and that these matters be almost + grown to a head, "some of their fingers itching to be set to work." Willaston adds, + "there is a particular irreconcilable desperate malice against your Honour's person, + which is principally the cause I make bold to write unto your Lordship. You have yet + the papists in your hands, and are masters; if you let them increase and grow so + insolent, assuredly it will come to pass as to the King of Israel, who having + overthrown Benhadab ..." and so on.</p> + + <p>On October 14th, Willaston again writes from Rouen<sup><a name="FN211A" id= + "FN211A"></a><a href="#FN211">[211]</a></sup> "about some matters pretended by our + Romish Catholics." The party, he says, "who" has given light into this business "is one + George Southwaick, well-known to many of your Lordship's followers." This Southwaick, + he holds to be "very honest;" he is going to England with sundry priests and others, + and upon landing will at once communicate with the authorities and have his comrades + arrested. "Southwaick <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg + 100]</a></span>himself," adds Willaston, "must be taken as well as the others, for he + desireth not to be known to have given any information against the rest. If it please + your Lordship to take order for his imprisonment apart, that conference privately may + be had with him, until such time as shall be thought fit to deliver him, he can give + you good directions for many matters, and may stand your honour in stead for such + purposes."</p> + + <p>There follows a notable suggestion: "If your Lordship would be pleased to set some + man to win the Nuncio of the Pope his secretary in Paris, you should receive very + direct and sound instructions from him." The writer goes on to speak of an intended + rebellion in England, and the kindling of a fire there, and dutifully concludes, "God + grant they touch not the person of the King nor of his children."</p> + + <p>On the 27th of October, nine days before the "discovery," Southwaick himself, now in + England, writes to Cecil,<sup><a name="FN212A" id="FN212A"></a><a href= + "#FN212">[212]</a></sup> urging that the impending arrest of priests and others should + be deferred, and that for better management of "the business, and for the better and + more substantial manifestation thereof," he ventures to suggest that "more scope of + time would make the service of more worth." Moreover, he gives warning of preparations + for trouble in the shires, in connection with "their plot," and finally promises, "your + Honour shall not only have knowledge of all such as are any way intercepted in the + same, but also knowledge of the end of their whole purpose, and withal be certain of + their meeting here in London, where I do not doubt to apprehend forty priests, with + many great of name, at mass, in good speed of their great intent."</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span></p> + + <p>On the morning of the 5th of November itself, evidently before receiving news that + the final blow had been struck, Southwaick writes to Levinus Munck, Cecil's private + secretary.<sup><a name="FN213A" id="FN213A"></a><a href="#FN213">[213]</a></sup> He + excuses himself for recent silence on the ground that he could not without prejudice to + "the business" have communicated with his employers. "The parties," he declares, "have + had, ever since I saw you, such obscure meetings, such mutable purposes, such uncertain + resolutions, as hath made me ride both day and night, as well in foul weather as fair, + omitting no opportunities, lest I should not effect what I have by the weight of my + credit and the engagement of my duty and reputation propounded to my honourable Lord." + He farther begs that nothing may be done that might disclose his true character to his + intended victims, and concludes by declaring that, if he be not much mistaken, he is + about "a singular service."</p> + + <p>If such letters proved nothing more, they would abundantly serve to discredit the + idea that a government which conducted its operations in such a fashion could be + hoodwinked by such clumsy contrivances as those of the cellar and the mine.</p> + + <p>Five days later,<sup><a name="FN214A" id="FN214A"></a><a href= + "#FN214">[214]</a></sup> Southwaick again writes to Munck, inclosing a note of the + priests who have had meetings in Paris, or have been written to in England. The + Ambassador (in Paris) will, he says, bear witness that, although unable to + particularize, he had given notice two months since that there was a plot brewing. He + adds a significant hint, the like of which we have <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span>already seen: "Should I chance to be + apprehended, I will rest myself upon my honourable Lord."<sup><a name="FN215A" id= + "FN215A"></a><a href="#FN215">[215]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Meanwhile the English ambassadors abroad were no less active and vigilant than the + informers at home, and while clearly aware that there was some danger on foot, never + doubted that the king's government would not be caught napping.</p> + + <p>On the 9th of October, Sir Thomas Edmondes wrote to Cecil from Brussels<sup><a name= + "FN216A" id="FN216A"></a><a href="#FN216">[216]</a></sup> to warn him of suspicious + symptoms in the Low Countries; and on the following day Cecil wrote to + Edmondes<sup><a name="FN217A" id="FN217A"></a><a href="#FN217">[217]</a></sup> + expressing apprehensions of trouble from the Jesuits abroad. On the same day, October + 10th, Sir Thomas Parry wrote from Paris to the secretary,<sup><a name="FN218A" id= + "FN218A"></a><a href="#FN218">[218]</a></sup> of a petition which the Catholics were + preparing against the meeting of Parliament, "and some further designs upon refusal;" + and in another letter informed Edmondes:<sup><a name="FN219A" id="FN219A"></a><a href= + "#FN219">[219]</a></sup> "somewhat is at present in hand amongst these desperate + hypocrites, which I trust God shall divert, by the vigilant care of his Majesty's + faithful servants and friends abroad, and prudence of his council at home."</p> + + <p>That such confidence was not misplaced is shown by Cecil's assurance to Sir Thomas + Parry,<sup><a name="FN220A" id="FN220A"></a><a href="#FN220">[220]</a></sup> mentioned + above, that the proceedings of the priests were never unknown to Government.</p> + + <p>Amongst the papers at Hatfield is a curious note, <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span>anonymous and undated, giving information + of a plot involving murder and treason, which, like the letter to Monteagle, simulates + rather too obviously the workmanship of an illiterate person, and artfully insinuates + that the design in question is undertaken in the name of religion, and chiefly favoured + by the priests.<sup><a name="FN221A" id="FN221A"></a><a href= + "#FN221">[221]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Another remarkable document is preserved in the same collection. This is a letter + written to Sir Everard Digby, June 11th, 1605, and treating of an otter hunt to be + undertaken when the hay shall be cut. It has, however, been endorsed by Salisbury, + "Letter written to Sir Everard Digby—Powder Treason."<sup><a name="FN222A" id= + "FN222A"></a><a href="#FN222">[222]</a></sup> Not only is it hard to see how the terms + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span>of the + document lend themselves to such an interpretation, but the date at which it was + written was fully three months prior to Digby's initiation in the conspiracy. The idea + is certainly suggested that, far from being passive and indolent, the authorities were + sedulously seeking pretexts to entangle as many as possible of those "great of name," + concerning whom we have already heard from one of their informers. This much, at any + rate, seems clear. Those at the centre of this complex web of espionage, to whom were + addressed all these informations and admonitions, cannot have been, as they protested + somewhat overmuch, in a state of careless inactivity, depending for security only upon + the protection of the Almighty, "who," as the secretary afterwards piously declared, + "blessed us in our slumber [and] will not forsake us now that we are + awake."<sup><a name="FN223A" id="FN223A"></a><a href="#FN223">[223]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The slumber would at least appear not to have been dreamless. On the one hand, the + secretary was evidently much exercised by a threatened <i>rapprochement</i> between his + royal master and Pope Clement VIII., who, through a Scotch Catholic gentleman, Sir + James Lindsay, had sent a friendly message to King James, which had elicited a + courteous and almost cordial reply.<sup><a name="FN224A" id="FN224A"></a><a href= + "#FN224">[224]</a></sup> The significance of this Cecil <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span>strenuously endeavoured, in a letter to the + Duke of Lenox,<sup><a name="FN225A" id="FN225A"></a><a href="#FN225">[225]</a></sup> to + explain away, and in February, 1604-5, we find him assuring the Archbishop of York with + an earnestness somewhat suspicious,<sup><a name="FN226A" id="FN226A"></a><a href= + "#FN226">[226]</a></sup> "I love not to procure or yield any toleration; a matter which + I well know no creature living durst propound to our religious Sovereign." For himself, + he thus declares: "I will be much less than I am, or rather nothing at all, before I + shall become an instrument of such a miserable change." Nevertheless, on the 17th of + April following, he was fain to acknowledge, in writing to Parry,<sup><a name="FN227A" + id="FN227A"></a><a href="#FN227">[227]</a></sup> that the news of Pope Clement's death + had much eased him in his mind.</p> + + <p>It would, however, appear that the spectre of possible toleration still haunted him, + and that he felt it necessary to commit the king to a course of severity. In a minute + of September 12th, 1605, addressed to the same ambassador, which has been corrected and + amended with an amount of care sufficiently testifying to the importance of the + subject,<sup><a name="FN228A" id="FN228A"></a><a href="#FN228">[228]</a></sup> after + speaking of "the plots and business of the priests," and the tendency of Englishmen + going abroad "in this time <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg + 106]</a></span>of peace" to become Catholics, he thus continues: "Only this is it + wherein my own heart receiveth comfort, that we live under a most religious and + understanding Prince, who sticketh not to publish, as well in his own particular, as in + the form of his government, how contrary that religion is to his resolution, and how + far he will be from ever gracing [it]." He goes on to declare that nothing will so + avail to make his Majesty withdraw his countenance from any man as such "falling + away."</p> + + <p>About the same time as this was written, we are told by a writer, almost a + contemporary,<sup><a name="FN229A" id="FN229A"></a><a href="#FN229">[229]</a></sup> + that a dependent of Cecil's warned a Catholic gentleman, by name Buck, of a "wicked + design" which his master had in hand against the papists.</p> + + <p>On the 17th of October, more than a week before the first hint of danger is said to + have been breathed, we find the minister writing to Sir Thomas Edmondes, at + Brussels,<sup><a name="FN230A" id="FN230A"></a><a href="#FN230">[230]</a></sup> in + terms which certainly appear to couple together the growing danger of conversions to + Catholicism, of which we have heard above, and the remedy soon to be supplied by the + new policy which the discovery of the Plot so effectively established. He speaks of the + "insolencies" of the priests and Jesuits, who are doing much injury by infecting with + their poison "every youth that cometh amongst them;" ominously adding, "which liberty + must, for one cause or another, be retrenched."</p> + + <p>There can be no doubt that the issue of the Gunpowder Plot was eminently calculated + to work such <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg + 107]</a></span>an effect; and even more would seem to have been anticipated from it + than was actually realized, for the secretary, we are told, promised King James that in + consequence of it not a single Jesuit should remain in England.</p> + + <p>In the accounts supplied to us as to the manner of the "discovery," we obtain much + interesting information from the utterances of the government itself. In studying these + we cannot fail to notice an evident effort to reconcile two conflicting interests. On + the one hand, that the king and the nation should be properly impressed with a sense of + their marvellous deliverance, it was essential to represent the catastrophe as having + been imminent, which could not be unless the preparations for it had been altogether + unsuspected; and it was likewise desirable to magnify the divine sagacity of the + monarch, which had been the instrument of Providence to avert a disaster otherwise + inevitable. On the other hand, however, it should not be made to appear that those to + whose keeping the public safety was intrusted had shown themselves culpably negligent + or incompetent; and it had therefore to be insinuated that, after all, they were not + without "sufficient advertisement" of danger, and even of danger specifically connected + with the actual conspirators, and directed against the Parliament. But, again, lest + such information should appear suspiciously accurate, the actual plotters had to be + merged in a larger body of their co-religionists, and their design to be represented in + vague and general terms. At the time, no doubt, this was effective enough. Now however + that we know, by the light of subsequent investigations, who exactly were engaged, + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span>and what was + in hand, it is possible to estimate these declarations at their true + value.<sup><a name="FN231A" id="FN231A"></a><a href="#FN231">[231]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Except with the aid of such an explanation as this, it seems impossible to + understand the endless inconsistencies and contradictions of the official narrative. + This we have in four forms, all coming to us on the highest authority, but addressed to + different audiences, and hopelessly at variance upon almost every point. One is that + given to the world as the "King's Book,"<sup><a name="FN232A" id="FN232A"></a><a href= + "#FN232">[232]</a></sup> containing, as Mr. Jardine tells us, the version which it was + desired that the general public should accept. A second was furnished by Cecil himself + to the ambassadors at Madrid and Brussels, and the Lord Deputy in Ireland,<sup><a name= + "FN233A" id="FN233A"></a><a href="#FN233">[233]</a></sup> and a third to the ambassador + at Paris.<sup><a name="FN234A" id="FN234A"></a><a href="#FN234">[234]</a></sup> We have + likewise the minute of November 7th, already mentioned as perhaps intended for the + information of the Privy Council, which, although it has seemingly served as the basis + of the story told in the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg + 109]</a></span>"King's Book," contradicts that story in various not unimportant + particulars.</p> + + <p>We shall afterwards have to examine in some detail the divergencies of these several + narratives: at present we are concerned only with the intimation which they afford of a + previous knowledge of the Plot on the part of the government. In the "King's + Book"—which was not only to be disseminated broadcast at home, but to be + translated and spread abroad, and, moreover, to be suited to the taste of its supposed + author—the preternatural acuteness of the monarch is extolled in terms of most + preposterous flattery, and his secretary is represented as altogether incredulous of + danger, and unwilling to be convinced even by his royal master's wonderful + interpretation of the mysterious warning. Nevertheless, not only is mention + parenthetically introduced of the minister's "customable and watchful care of the king + and State, boiling within him," of his laying up these things in his heart, "like the + Blessed Virgin Mary," and being unable to rest till he had followed the matter + farther,—but it is dexterously intimated that, for all his hardness of belief, he + was sufficiently well informed before the warning came to hand, and that "this accident + did put him in mind of divers advertisements he had received from beyond the seas, + wherewith he had acquainted as well the king himself, as divers of his Privy + Councillors, concerning some business the Papists were in, both at home and abroad, + making combination amongst them for some combination against this Parliament time," + their object being to approach the king with a petition for toleration, "which should + be delivered in some such order, and so well backed, as the king should be <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span>loth to refuse their + requests; like the sturdy beggars craving alms with one open hand, but carrying a stone + in the other, in case of refusal."</p> + + <p>As prepared for the Privy Council, the account, though substantially the same, was + somewhat more explicit. The secretary was fully aware, so the Lords were told, "that + some practices might be doubted," and he "had, any time these three months, acquainted + the King, and some of his Majesty's inward Counsellors, that the priests and laymen + abroad and at home were full of the papists of this kingdom, seeking still to lay some + <i>plot</i> for procuring at this Parliament exercise of their religion."</p> + + <p>In his letter to the ambassadors Cecil was able to speak more plainly, for this + document was not to meet the eye of James. Accordingly, he not only acknowledges that + on seeing the Monteagle letter he at once divined the truth, and understood all about + the powder, and moreover reverses the parts played by his Majesty and + himself—making the former incredulous in spite of what he himself could urge in + support of his opinion—but he goes on to give his previous information a far more + definite complexion: "Not but that I had sufficient advertisement that most of these + that now are fled [<i>i.e.</i> the conspirators]—being all notorious + Recusants—with many others of that kind, had a practice in hand for some stir + this Parliament." He, moreover, describes the plotters, in terms already cited, as + "gentlemen spent in their fortunes and fit for all alterations."</p> + + <p>In view of all this it is quite impossible to believe the account given of + themselves by those who were responsible for the public safety, and to suppose that + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span>they were not + only so neglectful of their duty, but so incredibly foolish, and so unlike themselves, + as to permit a gross and palpable peril to approach unnoticed. If, on the other hand, + as appears to be certain, the information with which they were supplied were copious + and minute, erring by excess far more than by defect, if, instead of lethargy and + carelessness, we find in their conduct, at every stage of the proceedings, evidence of + the extremest vigilance and of constant activity, and if they held it of prime + importance to disguise the facts, and were willing to incur the charge of having been + asleep at their posts, rather than let it be thought that they knew what they did, it + can scarcely be doubted that the history of the Gunpowder Plot given to the world was + in its essential features what they wished it to be.<sup><a name="FN235A" id= + "FN235A"></a><a href="#FN235">[235]</a></sup></p> + + <p>A practical illustration of the methods freely employed by statesmen of the period + will serve to throw fuller light upon this portion of our inquiry. In the service of + the government was one Thomas Phelippes,<sup><a name="FN236A" id="FN236A"></a><a href= + "#FN236">[236]</a></sup> by trade a "decipherer," who was employed to "make English" of + intercepted letters written in cipher. His services had been largely used in connection + with Mary, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg + 112]</a></span>Queen of Scots, some of whose letters he thus interpreted, having it in + his power, as Mr. Tytler remarks, to garble or falsify them at pleasure.<sup><a name= + "FN237A" id="FN237A"></a><a href="#FN237">[237]</a></sup> Moreover, to serve the + purposes of his masters, as he himself acknowledges,<sup><a name="FN238A" id= + "FN238A"></a><a href="#FN238">[238]</a></sup> he had upon occasion forged one side of a + correspondence, in order to induce the person addressed to commit himself in + reply.<sup><a name="FN239A" id="FN239A"></a><a href="#FN239">[239]</a></sup> At the + time of the Gunpowder Plot, however, Phelippes had himself fallen under suspicion, on + account of a correspondence with Hugh Owen, of whom we shall hear elsewhere. + Accordingly, an attempt was made to hoist him with his own petard, and another agent, + named Barnes, was employed by Cecil to write a letter, as coming from Phelippes (who + was then in England) and carry it to Owen in Flanders in order to draw him out. At + Dover, however, Barnes was arrested, being mistaken for another man for whom a watch + was being kept. Thereupon, his papers being seized and sent to the Earl of Northampton, + who appears not to have been in the secret of this matter, Cecil was obliged to arrest + Phelippes at once, as though the letter were genuine, instead of waiting, as he had + intended, in order to worm out more.</p> + + <p>The story of this complex and crooked business is frankly told by Cecil himself in a + letter to Edmondes, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg + 113]</a></span>English ambassador at Brussels, which, after the above abstract, will be + sufficiently intelligible.<sup><a name="FN240A" id="FN240A"></a><a href= + "#FN240">[240]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"As for Barnes, he is now returning again into Flanders, with many vows and promises + to continue to do good service. As he was at Dover with my pass, carrying a letter from + Philipps to Owen (of Barnes own handwriting, wherewith I was before acquainted), he was + suddenly stayed by order from the Lord Warden, upon suspicion that he was one Acton, a + traitor of the late conspiracy.... Whereupon, his papers and letters being sent to my + Lord of Northampton, I thought fit not to defer any longer the calling of Philipps into + question; which till then I had forborne, hoping by Barnes his means to have discovered + some further matter than before I could do."</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN200" id="FN200"></a><a href="#FN200A">[200]</a></sup> + He appears to have been no relation of John and Christopher Wright, the + conspirators.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN201" id="FN201"></a><a href="#FN201A">[201]</a></sup> + Davies was employed in other affairs of a similar nature. See <i>Dom. James I.</i>, + xix. 83, I (P.R.O.).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN202" id="FN202"></a><a href="#FN202A">[202]</a></sup> + Cf. a "setter dog."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN203" id="FN203"></a><a href="#FN203A">[203]</a></sup> + See the full text of Wright's letter, Appendix G.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN204" id="FN204"></a><a href="#FN204A">[204]</a></sup> + See the text of the memorial, Appendix G.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN205" id="FN205"></a><a href="#FN205A">[205]</a></sup> + Copy in the P.R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> vii. 86, and xx. 52. The informer's name is + given in the latter, viz., Ralph Ratcliffe.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN206" id="FN206"></a><a href="#FN206A">[206]</a></sup> + It was likewise cited in the interrogatories prepared for the Jesuit Thomas Strange + (Brit. Mus. <i>MSS. Add.</i> 6178, 74) in November, 1605, and in this case also as + treating of the Gunpowder Plot and no other.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN207" id="FN207"></a><a href="#FN207A">[207]</a></sup> + <i>Illustrations</i>, iii. 301.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN208" id="FN208"></a><a href="#FN208A">[208]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>France</i>, b. 132.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN209" id="FN209"></a><a href="#FN209A">[209]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN210" id="FN210"></a><a href="#FN210A">[210]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>France</i>, bundle 132.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN211" id="FN211"></a><a href="#FN211A">[211]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> f. 273 b.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN212" id="FN212"></a><a href="#FN212A">[212]</a></sup> + Hatfield MSS. 112, n. 141.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN213" id="FN213"></a><a href="#FN213A">[213]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 16.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN214" id="FN214"></a><a href="#FN214A">[214]</a></sup> + November 10th, 1605, <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 44.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN215" id="FN215"></a><a href="#FN215A">[215]</a></sup> + At a later period (July 20th, 1606) we find that Southwaick ("or Southwell") had lost + favour and was warned by Salisbury to leave the country. "I hold him," says the Earl, + "to be a very impostor." (<i>To Edmondes</i>, Phillipps MS. f. 165.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN216" id="FN216"></a><a href="#FN216A">[216]</a></sup> + Stowe MSS., 168, 39.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN217" id="FN217"></a><a href="#FN217A">[217]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> 40.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN218" id="FN218"></a><a href="#FN218A">[218]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> 42.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN219" id="FN219"></a><a href="#FN219A">[219]</a></sup> + Birch, <i>Historical View</i>, p. 234.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN220" id="FN220"></a><a href="#FN220A">[220]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>France</i>, bundle 132, January 25th, 1604-5.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN221" id="FN221"></a><a href="#FN221A">[221]</a></sup> + "Who so evar finds this box of letars let him carry hit to the Kings magesty: my + mastar litel thinks I knows of this, but yn ridinge wth him that browt the letar to + my mastar to a Katholyk gentlemans hows anward of his way ynto lin konsher + [Lincolnshire], he told me al his purpos, and what he ment to do; and he beinge a + prest absolved me and mad me swar nevar to revel hit to ane man. I confes myself a + Katholyk, and do hate the protystans relygon with my hart, and yit I detest to + consent ethar to murdar or treson. I have blotyd out sartyn nams in the letars becas + I wold not have ethar my mastar or ane of his frends trobyl aboute this; for by his + menes I was mad a goud Katholyk, and I wod to God the King war a good Katholyk: that + is all the harm I wish him; and let him tak hed what petysons or suplycasons he take + of ane man; and I hop this box will be found by som that will giv hit to the King, + hit may do him good one day. I men not to com to my mastar any moe, but wil return + unto my contry from whens I cam. As for my nam and contry I consel that; and God make + the King a goud Katholyk; and let Ser Robart Sesil and my lord Cohef Gustyse lok to + them selvse." (Printed in Appendix to <i>Third Report of Historical MSS. + Commission</i>, p. 148.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN222" id="FN222"></a><a href="#FN222A">[222]</a></sup> + It is signed "G.D.," and was possibly written by a relation of Sir Everard's.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN223" id="FN223"></a><a href="#FN223A">[223]</a></sup> + To Sir H. Bruncard, March 3rd, 1605-6. P.R.O. <i>Ireland</i>, vol. 218.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN224" id="FN224"></a><a href="#FN224A">[224]</a></sup> + "Instructions to my trusty servant Sir James Lindsay, for answer to the lettre and + Commission brought by him from the Pope unto me." A<sup>o</sup> 1604. (P.R.O. + <i>France</i>, b. 132.)</p> + + <p>In these notes the king explains that the things of greatest import cannot be + written, but have been imparted "by tongue" to the envoy, to be delivered to his + holiness. Moreover he thus charges Lindsay: "You shall assure him that I shall never + be forgetful of the continual proof I have had of his courtesy and long inclination + towards me, and especially by this his so courteous and unexpected message, which I + shall be careful to requite thankfully by all civil courtesies that shall be in my + power, the particulars whereof I remit likewise to your declaration." Besides this, + he protests that he will ever inviolably observe two points: first, never to + dissemble what he thinks, especially in matters of conscience; secondly, never to + reject reason when he hears it urged on the other side.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN225" id="FN225"></a><a href="#FN225A">[225]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>France</i>, b. 132.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN226" id="FN226"></a><a href="#FN226A">[226]</a></sup> + Lodge, <i>Illustrations</i>, iii. 262.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN227" id="FN227"></a><a href="#FN227A">[227]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>France</i>, b. 132.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN228" id="FN228"></a><a href="#FN228A">[228]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN229" id="FN229"></a><a href="#FN229A">[229]</a></sup> + <i>The Politician's Catechism</i>, 1658.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN230" id="FN230"></a><a href="#FN230A">[230]</a></sup> + Birch, <i>Historical View</i>, p. 234.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN231" id="FN231"></a><a href="#FN231A">[231]</a></sup> + "If the Priestes and Catholickes, so many thousands in England would have entertayned + it, no man can be so malicious and simple to thinke but there would have been a + greater assembly than fourscore [in the Midlands] to take such an action in hand, and + the Council could not be so winking eyed, but they would have found forth some one or + other culpable, which they could never do, though some of them, most powerable in it, + tendered and racked forth their hatred against us to the uttermost limites they could + extend." <i>English Protestants' plea</i>, p. 60.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN232" id="FN232"></a><a href="#FN232A">[232]</a></sup> + <i>Discourse of the manner of the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot.</i> Printed in the + Collected Works of King James, by Bishop Mountague, by Bishop Barlow, in <i>Gunpowder + Treason</i>, and in Cobbett's <i>State Trials</i>, as an appendix to that of the + conspirators.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN233" id="FN233"></a><a href="#FN233A">[233]</a></sup> + <i>I.e.</i>, Cornwallis, Edmondes, and Chichester. The despatch to Cornwallis is + printed in Winwood's <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 170.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN234" id="FN234"></a><a href="#FN234A">[234]</a></sup> + Sir Thoms Parry, P.R.O. <i>France</i>, bundle 132.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN235" id="FN235"></a><a href="#FN235A">[235]</a></sup> + Mr. Hepworth Dixon observes (<i>Her Majesty's Tower</i>, i. 352, seventh edition) + that a man must have been in no common measure ignorant of Cecil and Northampton who + could dream that such a design could escape the greatest masters of intrigue alive, + and that abundant evidence makes it clear that the Council were informed of the Plot + in almost every stage, and that their agents dogged the footsteps of those whom they + suspected, taking note of all their proceedings. "It was no part of Cecil's policy," + adds Mr. Dixon, "to step in before the dramatic time."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN236" id="FN236"></a><a href="#FN236A">[236]</a></sup> + Often called Phelipps, or Philipps.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN237" id="FN237"></a><a href="#FN237A">[237]</a></sup> + <i>History of Scotland</i>, iii. 376, note (ed. Eadie). It was on one of these + letters which had been in the hands of Phelippes that Mary was convicted.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN238" id="FN238"></a><a href="#FN238A">[238]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xx. 51. April, 1606.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN239" id="FN239"></a><a href="#FN239A">[239]</a></sup> + In the fragment cited above, Phelippes says that Queen Elizabeth and the Earl of + Essex largely availed themselves of this device of his, and that "My Lord of + Salisbury had himself made some use of it in the Queen's time."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN240" id="FN240"></a><a href="#FN240A">[240]</a></sup> + February 12th, 1605-6. (Stowe MSS. 168.)</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></a>CHAPTER VI.</h2> + + <h3>THE "DISCOVERY."</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">When</span> the conspirators first undertook their + enterprise, Parliament was appointed to meet on February 7th, 1604-5, but, as has been + seen, it was subsequently prorogued till October 3rd, and then again till Tuesday, + November 5th. On occasion of the October prorogation, the confederates employed Thomas + Winter to attend the ceremony in order to learn from the demeanour of the assembled + Peers whether any suspicion of their design had suggested this unexpected adjournment. + He returned to report that no symptom could be discerned of alarm or uneasiness, and + that the presence of the volcano underfoot was evidently unsuspected. Thus reassured, + his associates awaited with confidence the advent of the fatal Fifth.</p> + + <p>In the interval occurred the event which forms the official link connecting the + secret and the public history of the Plot, namely, the receipt of the letter of warning + by Lord Monteagle. That the document is of supreme importance in our history cannot be + denied, for the government account clearly stands or falls with the assertion that this + was in reality the means whereby the impending catastrophe was averted. That it was so, + the official story proclaimed from the first with a vehemence in itself suspicious, and + the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span>famous + letter was exhibited to the world with a persistence and solicitude not easy to + explain; being printed in the "King's Book," and in every other account of the affair; + while transcribed copies were sent to the ambassadors at foreign courts and other + public personages.<sup><a name="FN241A" id="FN241A"></a><a href= + "#FN241">[241]</a></sup> Had a warning really been given, in such a case, to save the + life of a kinsman or friend, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg + 116]</a></span>the circumstance, however fortunate, would scarcely have been wonderful, + nor can we think that the document would thus have been multiplied for inspection. If, + on the other hand, it had been carefully contrived for its purpose, it would not be + unnatural for those who knew where the weak point lay, to wish the world to be + convinced that there really had been a letter. It is, moreover, not easy to understand + the importance attributed to Monteagle's service in connection with it. To have handed + to the authorities such a message, evidently of an alarming nature, though he himself + did not professedly understand it, does not appear to have entitled him to the + extraordinary consideration which he in fact received. The Attorney General was + specially instructed, at the trial, to extol his lordship's conduct.<sup><a name= + "FN242A" id="FN242A"></a><a href="#FN242">[242]</a></sup> Wherever, in the confession + of the conspirators, his name was mentioned, it was erased, or pasted over with paper, + or the whole passage was omitted before publication of the document. All this is easy + to understand if he were the instrument employed for a critical and delicate + transaction, depending for success upon his discretion and reticence. On any other + supposition it seems inexplicable.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image14" id="image14"></a><img src="images/image14.png" width="600" height= + "534" alt="MONTEAGLE AND LETTER." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">monteagle and letter.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>Moreover, Monteagle's services received most substantial acknowledgment in the form + of a grant of <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg + 117]</a></span>£700 a year,<sup><a name="FN243A" id="FN243A"></a><a href= + "#FN243">[243]</a></sup> equivalent, at least, to ten times that amount in money of the + present day.<sup><a name="FN244A" id="FN244A"></a><a href="#FN244">[244]</a></sup> + There still exists<sup><a name="FN245A" id="FN245A"></a><a href= + "#FN245">[245]</a></sup> the draft preamble of the grant making this award, which has + been altered and emended with an amount of care which sufficiently testifies to the + importance of the matter. In this it is said of the letter that by the knowledge + thereof "we had the first <i>and only</i> means to discover that most wicked and + barbarous plot"—the words italicised being added as an interlineation by Cecil + himself. Nevertheless, it appears certain that this is not, and cannot be, the truth; + indeed, historians of all shades equally discountenance the idea. Mr. + Jardine<sup><a name="FN246A" id="FN246A"></a><a href="#FN246">[246]</a></sup> considers + it "hardly credible that the letter was really the means by which the plot was + discovered," and inclines to the belief<sup><a name="FN247A" id="FN247A"></a><a href= + "#FN247">[247]</a></sup> that the whole story concerning it "was merely a device of the + government ... to conceal the means by which their information had been derived." + Similarly Mr. J.S. Brewer<sup><a name="FN248A" id="FN248A"></a><a href= + "#FN248">[248]</a></sup> holds it as certain that this part, at least, of the story is + a fiction designed to conceal the truth. Mr. Gardiner, who is less inclined than others + to give up the received story, thinks that, to say the least of it, it is highly + probable that Monteagle expected the letter before it came.<sup><a name="FN249A" id= + "FN249A"></a><a href="#FN249">[249]</a></sup></p> + + <p>For a right understanding of the point it is necessary <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span>to consider the character + of the man who plays so important a part in this episode. Lord Monteagle, the eldest + son of Lord Morley, ennobled under a title derived through his mother, was, in Mr. + Jardine's opinion,<sup><a name="FN250A" id="FN250A"></a><a href= + "#FN250">[250]</a></sup> "a person precisely adapted for an instrument on such an + occasion;" and the description appears even more applicable than was intended. He had + been implicated in all the doings of the turbulent section of the English + Catholics<sup><a name="FN251A" id="FN251A"></a><a href="#FN251">[251]</a></sup> for + several years, having taken part in the rising of Essex, and in the Spanish + negotiations, whatever they were, conducted through the instrumentality of Thomas + Winter. With Catesby, and others of the conspirators, he was on terms of the closest + and most intimate friendship, and Tresham was his brother-in-law. A letter of his to + Catesby is still preserved, which, in the opinion of some, affords evidence of his + having been actually engaged in the Powder Plot itself;<sup><a name="FN252A" id= + "FN252A"></a><a href="#FN252">[252]</a></sup> and Mr. Jardine, though dissenting from + the view that the letter proves so much, judges it not at all impossible or improbable + that he was in fact privy to the conspiracy. It is likewise certain that up to the last + moment Monteagle was on familiar terms with the plotters, to whom, a few days before + the final catastrophe, he imparted an important piece of information.<sup><a name= + "FN253A" id="FN253A"></a><a href="#FN253">[253]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span></p> + + <p>At the same time it is evident that Monteagle was in high favour at Court, as is + sufficiently evidenced by the fact that he was appointed to be one of the commissioners + for the prorogation of October 3rd, a most unusual distinction for one in his position, + as also by the pains taken by the government on behalf of his brother, who had shortly + before got himself into trouble in France.<sup><a name="FN254A" id= + "FN254A"></a><a href="#FN254">[254]</a></sup> A still more remarkable circumstance has + been strangely overlooked by historians.<sup><a name="FN255A" id="FN255A"></a><a href= + "#FN255">[255]</a></sup> Monteagle always passed for a Catholic, turbulent indeed and + prone to violence, but attached, even fanatically, to his creed, like his friend + Catesby and the rest. There remains, however, an undated letter of his to the + king,<sup><a name="FN256A" id="FN256A"></a><a href="#FN256">[256]</a></sup> in which he + expresses his determination to become a Protestant; and while in fulsome language + extolling his Majesty's zeal for his spiritual welfare, speaks with bitterness and + contempt of the faith which, nevertheless, he continued to profess to the end of his + life, and that without exciting suspicion of his deceit among the Catholics. Not only + must this shake our confidence <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id= + "Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span>in the genuine nature of any transaction in which such a + man played a prominent part, it must likewise suggest a doubt whether others may not in + like manner have passed themselves off for what they were not, without arousing + suspicion.</p> + + <p>The precise facts as to the actual receipt of the famous letter are involved, like + every other particular of this history, in the obscurity begotten of contradictory + evidence. In the published account,<sup><a name="FN257A" id="FN257A"></a><a href= + "#FN257">[257]</a></sup> it is stated with great precision that it was received by + Monteagle on Saturday, October 26th, being but ten days before the Parliament. In his + letter to the ambassadors abroad,<sup><a name="FN258A" id="FN258A"></a><a href= + "#FN258">[258]</a></sup> Cecil dates its receipt "about eight days before the + Parliament should have begun." In the account furnished for the benefit of the King of + France,<sup><a name="FN259A" id="FN259A"></a><a href="#FN259">[259]</a></sup> the same + authority declares that it came to hand "some four or five days before." A doubt is + thus unquestionably suggested as to whether the circumstances of its coming to + Monteagle's hands are those traditionally described: for our present purpose, however, + it will perhaps be sufficient to follow the story as formally told by authority in the + king's own book.</p> + + <p>On Saturday, October 26th, ten days before the assembly of Parliament, Monteagle + suddenly, and without previous notice, ordered a supper to be prepared <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span>at his house at Hoxton + "where he had not supped or lain of a twelvemonth and more before that + time."<sup><a name="FN260A" id="FN260A"></a><a href="#FN260">[260]</a></sup> While he + was at table one of his pages brought him a letter which had been given to him by a man + in the street, whose features he could not distinguish, with injunctions to place it in + his master's own hands. It is undoubtedly a singular circumstance, which did not escape + notice at the time, that the bearer of this missive should have thus been able to find + Monteagle at a spot which he was not accustomed to frequent, and the obvious inference + was drawn, that the arrival of the letter was expected. On this point, indeed, there is + somewhat more than inference to go upon, for in Fulman's MS. collection at Corpus + Christi College, Oxford, among some interesting notes concerning the Plot, of which we + shall see more, occurs the statement that "the Lord Monteagle knew there was a letter + to be sent to him before it came."<sup><a name="FN261A" id="FN261A"></a><a href= + "#FN261">[261]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span></p> + + <p>Monteagle opened the letter, and, glancing at it, perceived that it bore neither + date nor signature, whereupon he handed it to a gentleman of his household, named Ward, + to read aloud, an apparently unnatural and imprudent proceeding not easy to explain, + but, at least, inconsistent with the conduct of one receiving an obviously important + communication in such mysterious circumstances. The famous epistle must be given in its + native form.</p> + + <div class="blockquot"> + <p class="c6">My lord out of the love i beare to some of youere frends i have a caer + of youer preseruacion therfor i would advyse yowe as yowe tender youer lyf to devys + some excuse to shift of youer attendance at this parleament for god and man hath + concurred to punishe the wickednes of this tyme and think not slightlye of this + advertisment but retyre youre self into youre contri wheare yowe may expect the event + in safti for thowghe theare be no apparence of anni stir yet i saye they shall + receyve a terrible blowe this parleament and yet they shall not seie who hurts them + this cowncel is not to be contemned because it maye do yowe good and can do yowe no + harme for the dangere is passed as soon as yowe have burnt the letter and i hope god + will give yowe the grace to mak good use of it to whose holy proteccion i comend + yowe</p> + + <p>(Addressed) <i>to the ryht honorable the lord mo<span class= + "c11">u</span>teagle</i></p> + </div> + + <p>Monteagle, though he saw little or nothing in this strange effusion, resolved at + once to communicate with the king's ministers, his Majesty being at the time engaged at + Royston in his favourite pastime of the chase, and accordingly proceeding at once to + town, he <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg + 123]</a></span>placed the mysterious document in the hands of the Earl of + Salisbury.<sup><a name="FN262A" id="FN262A"></a><a href="#FN262">[262]</a></sup></p> + + <p>As to what thereafter followed and the manner in which from this clue the discovery + was actually accomplished, it is impossible to say more than this, that the accounts + handed down cannot by any possibility be true, inasmuch as on every single point they + are utterly and hopelessly at variance. We can do no more than set down the particulars + as supplied to us on the very highest authority.</p> + + <p class="center">A.—<i>The account published in the "King's Book."</i></p> + + <p>1. The letter was received ten days before the meeting of Parliament, <i>i.e.</i>, + on October 26th.</p> + + <p>2. The Earl of Salisbury judged it to be the effusion of a lunatic, but thought it + well, nevertheless, to communicate it to the king.</p> + + <p>3. This was done five days afterwards, November 1st, when, in spite of his + minister's incredulity, James insisted that the letter could intend nothing but the + blowing up of the Parliament with gunpowder, and that a search must be made, which, + however, should be postponed till the last moment.</p> + + <p>4. Accordingly, on the afternoon of Monday, November <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span>4th, the Lord Chamberlain going on a tour + of inspection, visited the "cellar" and found there "great store of billets, faggots, + and coals," and moreover, "casting his eye aside, perceived a fellow standing in a + corner ... Guido Fawkes the owner of that hand which should have acted that monstrous + tragedy." Coming back, the chamberlain reported that the provision of fuel appeared + extraordinary, and that as to the man, "he looked like a very tall and desperate + fellow."</p> + + <p>5. Thereupon the king insisted that a thorough scrutiny must be made, and that + "those billets and coals should be searched to the bottom, it being most suspicious + that they were laid there only for covering of the powder." For this purpose Sir Thomas + Knyvet, a magistrate, was despatched with a suitable retinue.</p> + + <p>6. Before his entrance to the house, Knyvet found Faukes "standing without the + doors, his boots and clothes on," and straightway apprehended him. Then, going into the + cellar, he removed the firewood and at once discovered the barrels.</p> + + <p class="center">B.—<i>The Account sent by Salisbury to the Ambassadors abroad, + and the Deputy in Ireland, November 9th, 1605.</i></p> + + <p>1. The letter was received about <i>eight</i> days before the Parliament.</p> + + <p>2. Upon perusal thereof, Salisbury and Suffolk, the chamberlain, "both conceived + that it could not be more proper than the time of Parliament, nor by any other way to + be attempted than with powder, while the King was sitting in that Assembly." With this + interpretation <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg + 125]</a></span>other Lords of the Council agreed; but they thought it well not to + impart the matter to the king till three or four days before the session.</p> + + <p>3. His Majesty was "hard of belief" that any such thing was intended, but his + advisers overruled him and insisted on a search, not however till the last moment.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image15" id="image15"></a><img src="images/image15.png" width="600" height= + "422" alt="ARREST OF GUY FAUKES." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">arrest of guy faukes.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>4. About 3 o'clock on the afternoon of Monday, November 4th, the Lord Chamberlain, + Suffolk, visited the cellar, and found in it only firewood and not Faukes.</p> + + <p>5. The lords however insisting, in spite of the king, that the matter should be + probed to the bottom, Knyvet was despatched with orders to "<i>remove all the wood, and + so to see the plain ground underneath</i>."</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span></p> + + <p>6. Knyvet, about midnight, "going unlooked for into the vault, found that fellow + Johnson [<i>i.e.</i>, Faukes] <i>newly come out of the vault</i>," and seized him. + Then, having removed the wood, he perceived the barrels.</p> + + <p class="center">C.—<i>The Account furnished by Salisbury for the information of + the King of France, November 6th, 1605. (Original draft, in the P.R.O.)</i></p> + + <p>1. The letter was received <i>some four or five days</i> before the Parliament.</p> + + <p>2. This being shown to the king and the lords, "their lordships found not good ... + to give much credit to it, nor yet so to contemn it as to do nothing at all."</p> + + <p>3. It was accordingly determined, the night before, "to make search about that place + and to appoint a watch in the old Palace, to observe what persons might resort + thereabouts."</p> + + <p>4. Sir T. Knyvet, being appointed to the charge thereof, <i>going by chance, about + midnight, into the vault, by another door, found Faukes within</i>. Thereupon he caused + some few faggots to be removed, and so discovered some of the barrels, "<i>merely, as + it were, by God's direction, having no other cause but a general + jealousy</i>."<sup><a name="FN263A" id="FN263A"></a><a href= + "#FN263">[263]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span></p> + + <p>Never, assuredly, was a true story so hard to tell. Contradictions like these, upon + every single point of the narrative, are just such as are wont to betray the author of + a fiction when compelled to be circumstantial.</p> + + <p>To say nothing of the curious discrepancies as to the date of the warning, it is + clearly impossible to determine the locality of Guy's arrest. The account officially + published in the "King's Book" says that this took place in the street. The letter to + the ambassadors assigns it to the cellar and afterwards to the street; that to Parry, + to the cellar only. Faukes himself, in his confession of November 5th, says that he was + apprehended neither in the street nor in the cellar, but in his own room in the + adjoining house. Chamberlain writes to Carleton, November 7th, that it was in the + cellar. Howes, in his continuation of Stowe's <i>Annals</i>, describes two arrests of + Faukes, one in the street, the other upstairs in his own chamber. This point, though + seemingly somewhat trivial, has been invested with much importance. According to the + time-honoured story, the baffled desperado roundly declared that had he been within + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span>reach of the + powder when his captors appeared, he would have applied a match and involved them in + his own destruction. This circumstance is strongly insisted on not only in the "King's + Book," but also in his Majesty's speech to Parliament on November 9th, which declared, + "and in that also was there a wonderful providence of God, that when the party himself + was taken he was but new come out of his house from working, having his fire-work for + kindling ready in his pocket, wherewith, as he confesseth, if he been taken immediately + before, he was resolved to have blown up himself with his takers." We learn, however, + from Cecil's earliest version of the history, that Faukes was apprehended in the very + situation most suitable for such a purpose, "in the place itself, as he was busy to + prepare his things for execution," while Chamberlain adds that he was actually engaged + in "making his trains."</p> + + <p>Far more serious, to say nothing of the episode of the chamberlain's visit, are the + divergencies of the several versions as to the very substance of the story. We are told + that King James was the first to understand and interpret the letter which had baffled + the sagacity of his Privy Council; that the Lords of the Council had fully interpreted + it several days before the king saw it; that the said lords would not credit the king's + interpretation; that the king would not believe their interpretation; and that neither + the one nor the other ever interpreted it at all; that his Majesty insisted on a search + being made in spite of the reluctance of his ministers; that they insisted on the + search in spite of the reluctance of their royal master; and that no such search was + ever proposed <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg + 129]</a></span>by either; that Knyvet was despatched expressly to look for gunpowder, + with instructions to rummage the firewood to the bottom, leaving no cover in which a + barrel might lie hid; and that having no instructions to do anything of the kind, nor + any reason to suspect the existence of any barrels, he discovered them only by a piece + of luck, so purely fortuitous as to be clearly providential. On this last point + especially the contradictions are absolutely irreconcilable.</p> + + <p>It is abundantly evident that those who with elaborate care produced these various + versions were not supremely solicitous about the truth of the matter, and varied the + tale according to the requirements of circumstances. As Mr. Jardine + acknowledges,<sup><a name="FN264A" id="FN264A"></a><a href="#FN264">[264]</a></sup> the + great object of the official accounts was to obtain credence for what the government + wished to be believed, or, as Father Gerard puts it,<sup><a name="FN265A" id= + "FN265A"></a><a href="#FN265">[265]</a></sup> these accounts were composed "with desire + that men should all conceive this to be the manner how the treason came to light." If + from time to time the details were altogether transformed, it was clearly not through + any abstract love of historical accuracy, but rather that there were difficulties to + meet and doubts to satisfy, which had to be dealt with in order to produce the desired + effect.</p> + + <p>That, from the beginning, there was whispered disbelief, which it was held + all-important to silence, is sufficiently attested by Cecil himself, when, on the very + morrow of the discovery, he sent to Parry his first draft of the history. "Thus much," + he wrote, "I have thought necessary to impart unto you in haste, to the end that you + may deliver as much to the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg + 130]</a></span>French king, for prevention of false bruits, which I know, as the nature + of fame is, will be <i>increased</i>,<sup><a name="FN266A" id="FN266A"></a><a href= + "#FN266">[266]</a></sup> perverted, and disguised according to the disposition of + men."</p> + + <p>It does not appear why the appearance of erroneous versions of so striking an event + should have been thus confidently anticipated if the facts were undeniably established; + while, on the other hand, it is not a little remarkable that the narrative thus + expressly designed to establish the truth, should have been forthwith abandoned and + contradicted by its author in every single particular.</p> + + <p>Important information upon the same point is furnished by Cecil in another letter, + written in the following January.<sup><a name="FN267A" id="FN267A"></a><a href= + "#FN267">[267]</a></sup> He undertakes to explain to his correspondent how it came to + pass that a circumstance of supreme importance, of which the government were fully + cognizant,<sup><a name="FN268A" id="FN268A"></a><a href="#FN268">[268]</a></sup> was + not mentioned in the official account. This he does as follows: "And although in his + Majesty's book there is not any mention made of them [the Jesuits], and of many + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span>things else + which came to the knowledge of the State, yet is it but a frivolous inference that + thereby [they] seek to serve their turn, considering the purpose of his Majesty was not + to deliver unto the world all that was confessed concerning this action, <i>but so much + only of the manner and form of it, and the means of the discovery</i>, as might make it + apparent, both how wickedly it was conceived by those devilish instruments, and <i>how + graciously it pleased God to deal with us in such an extraordinary discovery + thereof</i>."</p> + + <p>Turning to the details of the story which survive the struggle for existence in the + conflict of testimony, if any can be said to do so, there is abundant matter deserving + attention, albeit we may at once dismiss the time-honoured legend concerning the + sagacity of the British Solomon, and his marvellous interpretation of the riddling + phrases which baffled the perspicacity of all besides himself.<sup><a name="FN269A" id= + "FN269A"></a><a href="#FN269">[269]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span></p> + + <p>More important is Cecil's admission that the presence of the powder under the + Parliament House was at least suspected for several days before anything was done to + interfere with the proceedings of those who had put it there. The reasons alleged for + so extraordinary a course are manifestly absurd. It was resolved, he told the + ambassadors, "that, till the night before, nothing should be done to interrupt any + purpose of theirs that had any such devilish practice, but rather to suffer them to go + on to the end of their day." In like manner he informed the Privy Council<sup><a name= + "FN270A" id="FN270A"></a><a href="#FN270">[270]</a></sup> that it was determined to + make no earlier search, that "such <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_133" id= + "Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span>as had such practice in hand might not be scared before + they had let the matter run on to a full ripeness for discovery." It certainly appears + that, at least, it would have been well before the eleventh hour to institute + observations as to who might be coming and going about the cellar. On the other hand, + can it be imagined that any minister in his right senses would have allowed the + existence of a danger so appalling to continue so long, and have suffered a desperado + like Faukes to have gone on knocking about with his flint and steel and lantern in a + powder magazine beneath the House of Parliament? Accidents are proverbially always + possible, and in the circumstances described to us there would have been much more than + a mere possibility, for the action said to have been taken by the authorities, in + sending the chamberlain to "peruse" the vault, seems to have been expressly intended to + give the alarm; and had the conspirators been scared it would evidently have been their + safest plan to have precipitated the catastrophe, that in the confusion it would cause + they might escape. How terrible such a catastrophe would have been is indicated by + Father Greenway:<sup><a name="FN271A" id="FN271A"></a><a href="#FN271">[271]</a></sup> + "Over and above the grievous loss involved in the destruction of these ancient and + noble buildings, of the archives and national records, the king himself might have been + in peril, and other royal edifices, though situate at a distance, and undoubtedly many + would have perished who had come up to attend the Parliament." Moreover, the loss of + life in so thickly populated a spot must have been frightful, and especially amongst + the official classes.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span></p> + + <p>Father Greenway expresses his utter disbelief in the incident of the chamberlain's + visit:<sup><a name="FN272A" id="FN272A"></a><a href="#FN272">[272]</a></sup> "To speak + my own mind," he writes, "I do not see in this portion of the story any sort of + probability." He adds another remark of great importance. If the Lord + Chamberlain,—and, we may add, Sir T. Knyvet,—could get into the cellar + without the assistance of Faukes, to say nothing of the "other door" which makes its + appearance in Cecil's first version, there is an end of the secret and hidden nature of + the place, and some one else must have had a key. How, then, about the months during + which the powder had been lying in it; during much of which time it had been, + apparently, left to take care of itself? Did no man ever enter and inspect it + before?</p> + + <p>But questions far more fundamental inevitably suggest themselves. If, during ten, or + even during five days, a minister so astute and vigilant was willing to risk the danger + of an explosion, it certainly does not appear that he was much afraid of the powder, or + thought there was any harm in it. We have already remarked on the strangeness of the + circumstance that the plotters were able so easily to procure it. It may be observed + that they appear themselves to have <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_135" id= + "Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span>been disappointed with its quality, for we are + told<sup><a name="FN273A" id="FN273A"></a><a href="#FN273">[273]</a></sup> that late in + the summer they added to their store "as suspecting the former to be dank." Still more + remarkable, however, was the conduct of the government. Immediately upon the + "discovery" they instituted the most minute and searching inquiries as to every other + particular connected with the conspirators. We find copious evidence taken about their + haunts, their lodgings, and their associates: of the boatmen who conveyed them hither + and thither, the porters who carried billets, and the carpenters who worked for them: + inquiries were diligently instituted as to where were purchased the iron bars laid on + top of the barrels, which appear to have been considered especially dangerous; we hear + of sword-hilts engraved for some of the company, of three beaver hats bought by + another, and of the sixpence given to the boy who brought them home. But concerning the + gunpowder no question appears ever to have been asked, whence it came, or who furnished + it. Yet this would appear to be a point at least as important as the rest, and if it + was left in absolute obscurity, the inference is undoubtedly suggested that it was not + wished to have questions raised. It may be added that no mention is discoverable of the + augmentation of the royal stores by so notable a contribution as this would have + furnished.</p> + + <p>Neither can it escape observation that whereas the powder was discovered only on the + morning<sup><a name="FN274A" id="FN274A"></a><a href="#FN274">[274]</a></sup> of + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span>November 5th, + the peers met as usual in their chamber that very day.<sup><a name="FN275A" id= + "FN275A"></a><a href="#FN275">[275]</a></sup> It cannot be supposed either that four + tons of powder could have been so soon removed, or that the most valuable persons in + the State would have been suffered to expose themselves to the risk of assembling in so + perilous a situation.<sup><a name="FN276A" id="FN276A"></a><a href= + "#FN276">[276]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span></p> + + <p>However this may be, from the moment of the "discovery" the discovered gunpowder + disappears from history.<sup><a name="FN277A" id="FN277A"></a><a href= + "#FN277">[277]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image16" id="image16"></a><img src="images/image16.png" width="600" height= + "549" alt="DISCOVERY OF GUNPOWDER PLOT, AND COINS OF JAMES I." title="" /> + <span class="caption"><span class="smcap">discovery of gunpowder plot, and coins of + James i.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>There is another point which must be noticed. It might naturally be supposed that + after so narrow an escape, and in accordance with their loud protestations of alarm at + the proximity of a shocking calamity from which they had been so providentially + delivered, the official authorities would have carefully guarded against the + possibility of the like happening again. Their acts, however, were quite inconsistent + with their words, for they did nothing of the kind. For more than seventy years + afterwards the famous "cellar" continued to be leased in the same easy-going fashion to + any who chose to hire it, and continued to be the receptacle of <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span>all manner of rubbish and + lumber, eminently suited to mask another battery. Not till the days of the mendacious + Titus Oates, and under the influence of the panic he had engendered, did the Peers + bethink themselves that a project such as that of Guy Faukes might really be a danger, + and command that the "cellar" should be searched.<sup><a name="FN278A" id= + "FN278A"></a><a href="#FN278">[278]</a></sup> This was done, in November, 1678, by no + less personages than Sir Christopher Wren and Sir Jonas Moore, who reported that the + vaults and cellars under and near the House of Lords were in such a condition that + there could be no assurance of safety. It was accordingly ordered that they should be + cleared of all timber, firewood, coals, and other materials, and that passages should + be made through them all, to the end that they might easily be examined. At this time, + and not before, was instituted the traditional searching of the cellars on the eve of + Parliament.<sup><a name="FN279A" id="FN279A"></a><a href="#FN279">[279]</a></sup></p> + + <p>What then, it will be asked, really did occur? What was done by the conspirators? + and what by those who discovered them?</p> + + <p>Truth to tell, it is difficult, or rather impossible, to answer such questions. That + there was a plot of some kind cannot, of course, be doubted; that it was of such a + nature as we have been accustomed to believe, can be affirmed only if we are willing to + ignore difficulties which are by no means slight. There is, doubtless, a mass of + evidence in support of the traditional story upon these points, but while its value has + yet to be discussed, there are other considerations, hitherto overlooked, which are in + conflict with it.</p> + + <p>Something has been said of the amazing contradictions <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span>which a very slight examination of the + official story reveals at every turn, and much more might be added under the same + head.<sup><a name="FN280A" id="FN280A"></a><a href="#FN280">[280]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c12"> + <a name="image17" id="image17"></a><img src="images/image17.png" width="580" height= + "212" alt=""GUY FAUKES' LANTERN."" title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">"guy faukes' lantern."</span></span> + </div> + + <p>On the other hand it is clear that even as to the material facts there was not at + the time that unanimity which might have been expected. We have seen how anxious was + the Secretary of State that the French court should at once be rightly informed as to + all particulars. We learn, however, from Mr. Dudley <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span>Carleton, then attached to the embassy at + Paris,<sup><a name="FN281A" id="FN281A"></a><a href="#FN281">[281]</a></sup> that in + spite of Cecil's promptitude he was anticipated by a version of the affair sent over + from the French embassy in London, giving an utterly different complexion to it. + According to this, the design had been, "That the council being set, and some lords + besides in the chamber, a barrel of gunpowder should be fired underneath them, and the + greater part, if not all, blown up." According to this informant, therefore, it was not + the Parliament House but the Council Chamber which was to have been assailed, there is + no mention of the king, and we have one barrel of powder instead of thirty-six. It is + not easy to understand how in such a matter a mistake like this could have been made, + for it is the inevitable tendency of men to begin by exaggerating, and not by + minimizing, a sudden and startling peril.<sup><a name="FN282A" id="FN282A"></a><a href= + "#FN282">[282]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span></p> + + <p>Moreover, even this modest version of the affair was not suffered to pass + unchallenged. Three days later Carleton again wrote:<sup><a name="FN283A" id= + "FN283A"></a><a href="#FN283">[283]</a></sup> "The fire which was said to have burnt + our king and council, and hath been so hot these two days past in every man's mouth, + proves but <i>ignis fatuus</i>, or a flash of some foolish fellow's brain to abuse the + world; for it is now as confidently reported there was no such matter, nor anything + near it more than a barrel of powder found near the court."</p> + + <p>It must here be observed that the scepticism thus early manifested appears never to + have been exorcised from the minds of French writers, many of whom, of all shades of + thought, continue, down to our day, to assume that the real plotters were the king's + government.<sup><a name="FN284A" id="FN284A"></a><a href="#FN284">[284]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Neither can we overlook sundry difficulties, again suggested by the facts of the + case, which make it hard to understand how the plans of the plotters can in reality + have been as they are represented.</p> + + <p>We have already observed on the nature of the house occupied in Percy's name. If + this were, as Speed tells us, and as there is no reason to doubt, at <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span>the service of the Peers + during a session, for a withdrawing-room, and if the session was to begin on November + 5th, how could Faukes hope not only to remain in possession, but to carry on his + strange proceedings unobserved, amid the crowd of lacqueys and officials with whom the + opening of Parliament by the Sovereign must needs have flooded the premises? How was + he, unobserved, to get into the fatal "cellar"?</p> + + <p>This difficulty is emphasized by another. We learn, on the unimpeachable testimony + of Mrs. Whynniard, the landlady, that Faukes not only paid the last instalment of rent + on Sunday, November 3rd, but on the following day, the day immediately preceding the + intended explosion, had carpenters and other workfolk in the house "for mending and + repairing thereof."<sup><a name="FN285A" id="FN285A"></a><a href= + "#FN285">[285]</a></sup> To say nothing of the wonderful honesty of paying rent under + the circumstances, what was the sense of putting a house in repair upon Monday, which + on Tuesday was to be blown to atoms? And how could the practised eyes of such workmen + fail to detect some trace of the extraordinary and unskilled operations of which the + house is said to have been the theatre? If, indeed, the truth is that on the Tuesday + the premises were to be handed over for official use, it is easy to understand why it + was thought necessary to set them in order, but on no other supposition does this + appear comprehensible.</p> + + <p>Problems, not easy to solve, connect themselves, likewise, with the actual execution + of the conspirators' plan. If it would have been hard for Guy Faukes to get into the + "cellar," how was he ever to get out of it <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_143" id= + "Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span>again? We are so accustomed to the idea of darkness and + obscurity in connection with him and his business, as perhaps to forget that his + project was to have been executed in the very middle of the day, about noon or shortly + afterwards. The king was to come in state with retinue and guards, and attended by a + large concourse of spectators, who, as is usual on such occasions, would throng every + nook and corner whence could be obtained a glimpse of the building in which the royal + speech was being delivered.<sup><a name="FN286A" id="FN286A"></a><a href= + "#FN286">[286]</a></sup> It cannot be doubted, in particular, that the open spaces + adjacent to the House itself would be strictly guarded, and the populace not suffered + to approach too near the sacred precincts, more especially when, as we have seen, so + many suspicions were abroad of danger to his sacred Majesty, and to the Parliament.</p> + + <p>On a sudden a door immediately beneath the spot where the flower of the nation were + assembled, would be unlocked and opened, and there would issue there-from a man, + "looking like a very tall and desperate fellow," booted and spurred and equipped for + travel. He was to have but a quarter of an hour to save himself from the ruin he had + prepared.<sup><a name="FN287A" id="FN287A"></a><a href="#FN287">[287]</a></sup> What + possible chance was there that he would have been allowed to pass?</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</a></span></p> + + <p>As to his further plans, we have the most extravagant and contradictory accounts, + some obviously fabulous.<sup><a name="FN288A" id="FN288A"></a><a href= + "#FN288">[288]</a></sup> According to the least incredible, a vessel was lying below + London Bridge ready at once to proceed to sea and carry him to Flanders; while a boat, + awaiting him at the Parliament stairs, was to convey him to the ship.<sup><a name= + "FN289A" id="FN289A"></a><a href="#FN289">[289]</a></sup> If this were so, it is not + clear why he equipped himself with his spurs, which, however, are authenticated by as + good evidence as any other feature of the story. It would also appear that, here again, + the plan proposed was altogether impracticable, for at the time of his projected flight + the tide would have been flowing,<sup><a name="FN290A" id="FN290A"></a><a href= + "#FN290">[290]</a></sup> and it is well known that to attempt to pass Old London Bridge + against it would have been like trying to row up a waterfall. Neither does it seem + probable that the vessel would have been able to get out of the Thames for several + hours, before which time all egress would doubtless have been stopped.</p> + + <p>Such considerations must at least avail to make us pause before we can + unhesitatingly accept the traditional <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_145" id= + "Page_145">[Pg 145]</a></span>history, even in those broad outlines which appear to be + best established. The main point is, however, independent of their truth. Though all be + as has been affirmed concerning the "cellar" and its contents, and the plan of + operations agreed upon by the traitors, the question remains as to the real nature of + the "discovery." We have seen, on the one hand, that the official narrative bristles + with contradictions, and, whatever be the truth, with falsehoods. On the other hand, + the said narrative was avowedly prepared with the object of obtaining credence for the + picturesque but unveracious assertion that the plotters' design was detected "very + miraculously, even some twelve hours before the matter should have been put in + execution." On the Earl of Salisbury's own admission, it had been divined almost as + many days previously, and it was laid open at the last moment only because he + deliberately chose to wait till the last moment before doing anything. No doubt a + dramatic feature was thus added to the business, and one eminently calculated to + impress the public mind: but they who insist so loudly on the miraculousness of an + event which they alone have invested with the character of a miracle, must be content + to have it believed that they knew still more than in an unguarded moment they + acknowledged, and arranged other things concerning the Plot than its ultimate + disclosure.<sup><a name="FN291A" id="FN291A"></a><a href="#FN291">[291]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</a></span></p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN241" id="FN241"></a><a href="#FN241A">[241]</a></sup> + Copies were sent by Cecil to Cornwallis at Madrid, Parry at Paris, Edmondes at + Brussels, and Chichester at Dublin. Also by Chamberlain to Dudley Carleton.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN242" id="FN242"></a><a href="#FN242A">[242]</a></sup> + "Lastly, and this you must not omit, you must deliver, in commendation of my Lord + Mounteagle, words to show how sincerely he dealt, and how fortunately it proved that + he was the instrument of so great a blessing, ... because it is so lewdly given out + that he was once of this plot of powder, and afterwards betrayed it all to + me."—Cecil to Coke. (Draft in the R.O., printed by Jardine, <i>Criminal + Trials</i>, ii. 120.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN243" id="FN243"></a><a href="#FN243A">[243]</a></sup> + £500 as an annuity for life, and £200 per annum to him and his heirs for + ever in fee farm rents.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN244" id="FN244"></a><a href="#FN244A">[244]</a></sup> + See Thorold Rogers, <i>Agriculture and Prices</i>, v. 631, and Jessopp, <i>One + Generation of a Norfolk House</i>, p. 285.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN245" id="FN245"></a><a href="#FN245A">[245]</a></sup> + R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> xx. 56.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN246" id="FN246"></a><a href="#FN246A">[246]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 65.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN247" id="FN247"></a><a href="#FN247A">[247]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> 68.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN248" id="FN248"></a><a href="#FN248A">[248]</a></sup> + Note on Fuller's <i>Church History</i>, x. § 39, and <i>on The Student's + Hume</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN249" id="FN249"></a><a href="#FN249A">[249]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 251.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN250" id="FN250"></a><a href="#FN250A">[250]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 69.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN251" id="FN251"></a><a href="#FN251A">[251]</a></sup> + On March 13th, 1600-1, Monteagle wrote to Cecil from the Tower, "My conscience tells + me that I am no way gilty of these Imputations, and that mearely the blindness of + Ignorance lead me into these infamous errors." (Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. 6177).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN252" id="FN252"></a><a href="#FN252A">[252]</a></sup> + The letter is printed in <i>Archæologia</i>, xxviii. 422, by Mr. Bruce, who + argues from it Monteagle's complicity with the Plot. Mr. Jardine's reply is found + <i>ibid.</i> xxix. 80.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN253" id="FN253"></a><a href="#FN253A">[253]</a></sup> + According to T. Winter's famous declaration, Monteagle, within ten days before the + meeting of Parliament, told Catesby and the others that the Prince of Wales was not + going to attend the opening ceremony, wherefore they resolved to "leave the Duke + alone," and make arrangements to secure the elder brother.</p> + + <p>The original of Winter's declaration, dated November 25th, which is at Hatfield, + contains these and other particulars, which are altogether omitted in a "copy" of the + same in the Record Office, dated, remarkably enough, on November the 23rd. It is from + the latter that the version in the "King's Book" was printed.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN254" id="FN254"></a><a href="#FN254A">[254]</a></sup> + De Beaumont to Villeroy, September 17th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN255" id="FN255"></a><a href="#FN255A">[255]</a></sup> + Mr. Gardiner alludes to it, <i>History</i>, i. 254 (note), but apparently attaches no + importance to it.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN256" id="FN256"></a><a href="#FN256A">[256]</a></sup> + Brit. Museum, Add. MSS. 19402 fol. 143. See the letter in full, Appendix H.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN257" id="FN257"></a><a href="#FN257A">[257]</a></sup> + <i>Discourse of the Manner of the Discovery</i> (the "King's Book").</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN258" id="FN258"></a><a href="#FN258A">[258]</a></sup> + Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 170, etc. (November 9th). In the entry book of the + Earl of Salisbury's letters (Phillipps' MSS. 6297, f. 39) this is described as "being + the same that was sent to all his Majestie's Embassadors and Ministers abroade." To + Parry, however, quite a different account was furnished.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN259" id="FN259"></a><a href="#FN259A">[259]</a></sup> + Cecil to Sir T. Parry, P.R.O. <i>France</i>, bundle 132 (November 6th).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN260" id="FN260"></a><a href="#FN260A">[260]</a></sup> + Gerard, <i>Narrative</i>, p. 101.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN261" id="FN261"></a><a href="#FN261A">[261]</a></sup> + Vol. ii. 15. The partisans of the government at the time appear to have solved the + difficulty by invoking the direct guidance of Heaven:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"For thus the Lord in's all-protecting grace,<br /> + Ten days before the Parliament began,<br /> + Ordained that one of that most trayterous race<br /> + Did meet the Lord Mounteagles Serving-man,<br /> + <span class="c10">Who about Seven a clocke at night was sent</span><br /> + <span class="c10">Upon some errand, and as thus he went,</span><br /> + Crossing the street a fellow to him came,<br /> + A man to him unknowen, of personage tall,<br /> + In's hand a Letter, and he gave the same<br /> + Unto this Serving-man, and therewithall<br /> + <span class="c10">Did strictly charge him to take speciall heede</span><br /> + <span class="c10">To give it into's Masters hand with speede."</span></p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="right"><i>Mischeefes Mystery</i> (1617).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN262" id="FN262"></a><a href="#FN262A">[262]</a></sup> + Here again evidence was found of the direct guidance of Heaven:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"And thus with loyall heart away he goes,<br /> + Thereto resolved whatever should betide,<br /> + To th' Court he went this matter to disclose,<br /> + To th' Earle of Salsb'ryes chamber soone he hide,<br /> + <span class="c10">Whither heavens finger doubtless him directed,</span><br /> + <span class="c10">As the best meanes to have this fact detected."</span></p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="right c6">Mischeefes Mystery.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN263" id="FN263"></a><a href="#FN263A">[263]</a></sup> + In the account forwarded to the ambassadors, there is a curious contradiction. In the + general sketch of the discovery with which it opens, it is said that Faukes was + captured "in the place itself," with his lantern, "making his preparations." + Afterwards, in the detailed narrative of the proceedings, that he was taken outside. + The fact is, that the first portion of this letter is taken bodily from that of + November 6th to Parry, wherein the arrest of Faukes in the vault was a principal + point. Between the 6th and the 9th this part of the story had been altered, but it + does not seem to have been noticed that a remnant of the earlier version still + existed in the introductory portion.</p> + + <p>It will be remarked that the account of November 6th makes no mention of the visit + of the chamberlain to the vault, nor that of November 9th to the presence of Faukes + at the time of this visit. The minute of November 7th says that Faukes admitted the + chamberlain to the vault.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN264" id="FN264"></a><a href="#FN264A">[264]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 3-5.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN265" id="FN265"></a><a href="#FN265A">[265]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i>, p. 100.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN266" id="FN266"></a><a href="#FN266A">[266]</a></sup> + This word is cancelled in the original draft.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN267" id="FN267"></a><a href="#FN267A">[267]</a></sup> + To Sir T. Edmondes, January 22nd, 1605-6.—Stowe MSS., 168, 73, f. 301.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN268" id="FN268"></a><a href="#FN268A">[268]</a></sup> + <i>Viz.</i>, the complicity of the Jesuits, "not only as being casually acquainted + with the Plot," but as having been "principall comforters, to instruct the + consciences of some of these wicked Traytors, in the lawfulnesse of the Act and + meritoriousnesse of the same."</p> + + <p>On this it is enough to remark that when Father Garnet, the chief of the said + Jesuits, came afterwards to be tried, no attempt whatever was made to prove any such + thing. Cecil therefore wrote thus, and made so grave an assertion, without having any + evidence in his hands to justify it.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN269" id="FN269"></a><a href="#FN269A">[269]</a></sup> + That King James alone solved the enigma was put forth as an article of faith. In the + preamble to the Act for the solemnization of the 5th of November, Parliament declared + that the treason "would have turned to utter ruin of this whole kingdom, had it not + pleased Almighty God, by inspiring the king's most excellent Majesty with a divine + Spirit, to discover some dark phrases of a letter...." In like manner, the monarch + himself, in his speech to the Houses, of November 9th, informed them: "I did upon the + instant interpret and apprehend some dark phrases therein, contrary to the ordinary + grammar construction of them, and in another sort, than I am sure any divine or + lawyer in any university would have taken them."</p> + + <p>This "dark phrase" was the sentence—"For the danger is past as soon as you + have burnt the letter," which the royal sage interpreted to mean "as quickly," and + that by these words "should be closely understood the suddenty and quickness of the + danger, which should be as quickly performed and at an end as that paper should be of + blazing up in the fire."</p> + + <p>Of this famous interpretation Mr. Gardiner says that it is "certainly absurd;" + while Mr. Jardine is of opinion that the words in question "must appear to every + common understanding mere nonsense."</p> + + <p>When it was proposed in the House of Commons (January 31st, 1605-6,) to pass a + vote of thanks to Lord Monteagle for his share in the "discovery," one Mr. Fuller + objected that this would be to detract from the honour of his Majesty, for "the true + discoverer was the king."</p> + + <p>The reader will perhaps be reminded of Sir Walter Scott's inimitable picture of + the king's satisfaction in this notable achievement.</p> + + <p>"Do I not ken the smell of pouther, think ye? Who else nosed out the Fifth of + November, save our royal selves? Cecil, and Suffolk, and all of them, were at fault, + like sae mony mongrel tikes, when I puzzled it out; and trow ye that I cannot smell + pouther? Why, 'sblood, man, Joannes Barclaius thought my ingine was in some manner + inspiration, and terms his history of the plot, <i>Series patefacti divinitus + parricidii</i>; and Spondanus, in like manner, saith of us, <i>Divinitus + evasit</i>."—<i>Fortunes of Nigel</i>, c. xxvii.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN270" id="FN270"></a><a href="#FN270A">[270]</a></sup> + <i>Relation</i> ..., November 7th, 1605 (P.R.O.).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN271" id="FN271"></a><a href="#FN271A">[271]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i>, f. 68 b.—Stonyhurst MSS.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN272" id="FN272"></a><a href="#FN272A">[272]</a></sup> + F. 66. It will be remembered that this episode is not mentioned by Cecil in his + version of November 6th. Bishop Goodman's opinion is that this and other points of + the story were contrived for stage effect: "The King must have the honour to + interpret that it was by gunpowder; and the very night before the parliament began it + was to be discovered, to make the matter the more odious, and the deliverance the + more miraculous. No less than the lord chamberlain must search for it and discover + it, and Faux with his dark lantern must be apprehended." (<i>Court of King James</i>, + p. 105.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN273" id="FN273"></a><a href="#FN273A">[273]</a></sup> + T. Winter, November 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN274" id="FN274"></a><a href="#FN274A">[274]</a></sup> + There is, of course, abundant contradiction upon this point, as all others, but the + balance of evidence appears to point to 2 a.m. or thereabouts.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN275" id="FN275"></a><a href="#FN275A">[275]</a></sup> + The customary hour for the meeting of the Houses was 9 a.m., or even earlier. + (<i>Journals of Parliament.</i>)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN276" id="FN276"></a><a href="#FN276A">[276]</a></sup> + The list of those present is given in the <i>Lords' Journals</i>; it is headed by the + Lord Chancellor (Ellesmere), and includes the Archbishop of Canterbury, fourteen + bishops, and thirty-one peers, of whom Lord Monteagle was one. In 1598, as Mr. + Atkinson tells us in his preface to the lately published volume of the <i>Calendar of + Irish State Papers</i>, the cellars of the Dublin Law Courts were used as a powder + magazine. The English Privy Council, startled to hear of this remarkable arrangement, + pointed out that it might probably further diminish the number of loyal subjects in + that kingdom, but were quaintly reassured by the Irish Lords Justices, who explained + that, in view of the troublous state of the times, the sittings of the courts had + been discontinued, and were not likely to be resumed for the present.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN277" id="FN277"></a><a href="#FN277A">[277]</a></sup> + The only allusion to it I have been able to find occurs in the <i>Politician's + Catechism</i> (1658), p. 95: "Yet the barells, wherein the powder was, are kept as + reliques, and were often shown to the king and his posterity, that they might not + entertain the least thought of clemency towards the Catholique Religion. There is not + an ignorant Minister or Tub-preacher, who doth not (when all other matter fails) + remit his auditors to the Gunpowder Treason, and describe those tubs very + pathetically, the only reliques thought fit by them to be kept in memory."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN278" id="FN278"></a><a href="#FN278A">[278]</a></sup> + <i>Journals of the House of Lords</i>, November 1st and 2nd, 1678.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN279" id="FN279"></a><a href="#FN279A">[279]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i>, November 2nd, 1678.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN280" id="FN280"></a><a href="#FN280A">[280]</a></sup> I + have already remarked upon Faukes' statement that he was arrested in quite a + different place from any mentioned in the government accounts. It should be added, + that as to the person who arrested him, there is a somewhat similar discrepancy of + evidence. The honour is universally assigned by the official accounts to Sir T. + Knyvet, who in the following year was created a peer, which shows that he undoubtedly + rendered some valuable service on the occasion. An epitaph, however, in St. Anne's + Church, Aldersgate (printed in Maitland's <i>History of London</i>, p. 1065, 3rd + ed.), declares that it was Peter Heiwood, of Heywood, Lancashire, "who apprehended + Guy Faux, with his dark Lanthorn; and for his zealous Prosecution of Papists, as + Justice of Peace, was stabbed, in Westminster Hall, by John James, a Dominican Friar, + <span class="smcap">A.D.</span> 1640." No trace of this assassination can be found, + nor does the name of John James occur in the Dominican records. It is, however, a + curious coincidence that the "Guy Faukes' Lantern," exhibited in the Ashmolean Museum + at Oxford, bears the inscription: "<i>Laterna ilia ipsa quâ usus est, et cum + qua deprehensus Guido Faux in cryptâ subterraneâ, ubi domo</i> [sic] + <i>Parliamenti difflandae operam dabat. Ex dono Robti. Heywood nuper Academiae + Procuratoris, Ap. 4<sup>o</sup>, 1641.</i>" See the epitaph in full, Appendix I.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN281" id="FN281"></a><a href="#FN281A">[281]</a></sup> + To J. Chamberlain, 10th-20th November, 1605. P.R.O. <i>France</i>, b. 132, f. 335 + b.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN282" id="FN282"></a><a href="#FN282A">[282]</a></sup> + The Council appears at this time to have met in the Painted Chamber, and, without at + all wishing to lay too much stress upon this point, I cannot but remark that the + supposition that this was the original scene assigned to the operations of Faukes + would solve various difficulties:</p> + + <ol> + <li>Beneath the Painted Chamber was a vaulted cellar, answering to the description + we have so frequently heard, whereas under the House of Lords was neither a cellar + nor a vault.</li> + + <li>This crypt beneath the Painted Chamber has been constantly shown as "Guy + Faukes' Cellar."</li> + + <li>In prints of the period, Faukes is usually represented as going to blow up this + chamber, never the House of Lords.</li> + </ol> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN283" id="FN283"></a><a href="#FN283A">[283]</a></sup> + To Chamberlain, November 13th (O.S.), 1605. P.R.O.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN284" id="FN284"></a><a href="#FN284A">[284]</a></sup> + Thus M. Bouillet, in the latest edition of his <i>Dictionnaire d'histoire et + géographie</i>, speaks as follows: "Le ministre cupide et orgueilleux, + Cécil, semble avoir été l'âme du complot, et l'avoir + découvert lui même au moment propice, après avoir + présenté à l'esprit faible de Jacques I. les dangers auxquels il + était en but de la part des Catholiques."</p> + + <p>Gazeau and Prampain (<i>Hist. Mod.</i>, tome i.) speak of the conspiracy as "cette + plaisanterie;" and say of the conspirators, "Dans une cave, ils avaient + déposé 36 barils contenant (ou soi-disant tels) de la poudre."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN285" id="FN285"></a><a href="#FN285A">[285]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 39 (November 7).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN286" id="FN286"></a><a href="#FN286A">[286]</a></sup> + In Herring's <i>Pietas Pontificia</i> (1606) the king is described as coming to the + House:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">"Magna cum Pompa, stipatorumque Caterva,<br /> + Palmatisque, Togis, Gemmis, auroque refulgent:<br /> + Ingens fit Populi concursus, compita complens,<br /> + Turbis se adglomerant densis, spectantque Triumphum."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN287" id="FN287"></a><a href="#FN287A">[287]</a></sup> + Faukes himself says—examination of November 16th—that the touchwood would + have burnt a quarter of an hour.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN288" id="FN288"></a><a href="#FN288A">[288]</a></sup> + See Appendix K, <i>Myths of the Powder Plot</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN289" id="FN289"></a><a href="#FN289A">[289]</a></sup> + In connection with this appears an interesting example of the natural philosophy of + the time, it being said that Faukes selected this mode of escape, hoping that water, + being a non-conductor, would save him from the effects of the explosion.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN290" id="FN290"></a><a href="#FN290A">[290]</a></sup> I + am informed on high authority that on the day in question it was high water at London + Bridge between five and six p.m. In his <i>Memorials of the Tower of London</i> (p. + 136) Lord de Ros says that the vessel destined to convey him to Flanders was to be in + waiting for Faukes at the river side close by, and that in it he was to drop down the + river with the ebb tide. It would, of course, have been impossible for any sea-going + craft to make its way up to Westminster; nor would the ebb tide run to order.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN291" id="FN291"></a><a href="#FN291A">[291]</a></sup> + It is frequently said that the testimony of Bishop Goodman, who has been so often + cited, is discredited by the fact that he probably died a Catholic, for he was + attended on his death-bed by the Dominican Father, Francis à S. Clara + (Christopher Davenport), chaplain to Queen Henrietta Maria, a learned man who + indulged in the dream of corporate reunion between England and Rome, maintaining that + the Anglican articles were in accordance with Catholic doctrine.</p> + + <p>In his will Goodman professed that as he lived, so he died, most constant in all + the articles of the Christian Faith, and in all the doctrine of God's holy Catholic + and Apostolic Church, "whereof," he says, "I do acknowledge the Church of Rome to be + the Mother Church. And I do verily believe that no other church hath any salvation in + it, but only so far as it concurs with the faith of the Church of Rome." On this, Mr. + Brewer, his editor, observes that a sound Protestant might profess as much, the + question being what meaning is to be given to the terms employed. Moreover, the same + writer continues, Goodman cannot have imagined that his life had been a constant + profession of Roman doctrine, inasmuch as he advanced steadily from one preferment to + another in the Church of England, and strongly maintaining her doctrines formally + denounced those of Rome. What is certain, however, is this, that in the very work + from which his evidence is quoted he speaks in such a manner as to show that whatever + were his religious opinions, he was a firm believer in the Royal Supremacy and a + lover of King James, whom he thus describes: "Truly I did never know any man of so + great an apprehension, of so great love and affection,—a man so truly just, so + free from all cruelty and pride, such a lover of the church, and one that had done so + much good for the church." (<i>Court of King James</i>, i. 91.)</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII"></a>CHAPTER VII.</h2> + + <h3>PERCY, CATESBY, AND TRESHAM.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">On</span> occasion of a notorious trial in the Star + Chamber, in the year 1604,<sup><a name="FN292A" id="FN292A"></a><a href= + "#FN292">[292]</a></sup> Bancroft, the Archbishop of Canterbury, made the significant + observation<sup><a name="FN293A" id="FN293A"></a><a href="#FN293">[293]</a></sup> that + nothing was to be discovered concerning the Catholics "but by putting some Judas + amongst them." That amongst the Powder Plot conspirators there was some one who played + such a part, who perhaps even acted as a decoy-duck to lure the others to destruction, + has always been suspected, but with sundry differences of opinion as to which of the + band it was. Francis Tresham has most commonly been supposed at least to have sent the + warning letter to Monteagle, which proved fatal to himself and his comrades: some + writers have conjectured that he did a good deal more.<sup><a name="FN294A" id= + "FN294A"></a><a href="#FN294">[294]</a></sup> Monteagle himself, as we have seen, has + been supposed by others to have been in the Plot and to have betrayed it. It would + appear, however, that neither of these has so strong a claim to this equivocal + distinction as one whose name has been scarcely mentioned hitherto in such a + connection.</p> + + <p>The part played in the conspiracy by Thomas <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_148" + id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</a></span>Percy is undoubtedly very singular, and the more so + when we learn something of the history and character of the man. Till within some three + years previously<sup><a name="FN295A" id="FN295A"></a><a href="#FN295">[295]</a></sup> + he had been a Protestant, and, moreover, unusually wild and dissolute. After his + conversion, he acquired the character of a zealous, if turbulent, Catholic, and is so + described, not only by Father Gerard and Father Greenway, but by himself. In a letter + written so late as November 2nd, 1605,<sup><a name="FN296A" id="FN296A"></a><a href= + "#FN296">[296]</a></sup> he represents that he has to leave Yorkshire, being threatened + by the Archbishop with arrest, "as the chief pillar of papistry in that county."</p> + + <p>It unfortunately appears that all the time this zealous convert was a bigamist, + having one wife living in the capital and another in the provinces. When his name was + published in connection with the Plot, the magistrates of London arrested the one, and + those of Warwickshire the other, alike reporting to the secretary what they had done, + as may be seen in the State Paper Office.<sup><a name="FN297A" id="FN297A"></a><a href= + "#FN297">[297]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Gravely suspicious as such a fact must appear in connection with one professing + exceptional religious fervour, it by no means stands alone. Father Greenway, in + describing the character of Percy,<sup><a name="FN298A" id="FN298A"></a><a href= + "#FN298">[298]</a></sup> dwells much on his sensitiveness to the suspicion of having + played false to his fellow Catholics in his dealings with King <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</a></span><span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</a></span>James in Scotland, + coupled with protestations of his determination to do something to show that he as well + as they had been deceived by that monarch. We find evidence that as a fact some + Catholics distrusted him, as in the examination of one Cary, who, being interrogated + concerning the Powder Plot, protested that "Percy was no Papist but a + Puritan."<sup><a name="FN299A" id="FN299A"></a><a href="#FN299">[299]</a></sup> There + is likewise in the king's own book a strange and obscure reference to Percy as the + possible author of the letter to Monteagle, one of the chief grounds for suspecting him + being "his backwardness in religion." It would moreover appear that he was not a man + who always impressed those favourably who had to do with him, for Chamberlain reminds + his friend Carleton that the latter had ever considered him "a subtle, flattering, + dangerous knave."<sup><a name="FN300A" id="FN300A"></a><a href= + "#FN300">[300]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c13"> + <a name="image18" id="image18"></a><img src="images/image18.png" width="556" height= + "800" alt="THOMAS PERCY." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">thomas percy.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>We have seen something of the extraordinary manner in which Percy transacted the + business of hiring the house and "cellar," wholly unlike what we should expect from one + whose main object was to escape observation, and that he brought to bear the influence + of sundry Protestant gentlemen, amongst them Dudley Carleton himself,<sup><a name= + "FN301A" id="FN301A"></a><a href="#FN301">[301]</a></sup> in order to obtain the + desired lease. <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[Pg + 151]</a></span>We know, moreover, that various unfortunate accidents prevented the + history of these negotiations from ever being fully told.</p> + + <p>Yet more remarkable is a piece of information supplied by Bishop Goodman, his + authority being the eminent lawyer Sir Francis Moore, who, says he, "is beyond all + exception."<sup><a name="FN302A" id="FN302A"></a><a href="#FN302">[302]</a></sup> + Moore, having occasion during the period when the Plot was in progress to be out on + business late at night, and going homeward to the Middle Temple at two in the morning, + "several times he met Mr. Percy coming out of the great statesman's house, and wondered + what his business should be there." Such wonder was certainly not unnatural, and must + be shared by us. That a man who was ostensibly the life and soul of a conspiracy + directed against the king's chief minister, even more than against the sovereign + himself, should resort for conference with his intended victim at an hour when he was + most likely to escape observation, is assuredly not the least extraordinary feature in + this strange and tangled tale.</p> + + <p>Not less suspicious is another circumstance. Immediately before the fatal Fifth of + November, Percy had been away in the north, and he returned to London only on the + evening of Saturday, the 2nd. Of this return, Cecil, writing a week later,<sup><a name= + "FN303A" id="FN303A"></a><a href="#FN303">[303]</a></sup> made a great mystery, as + though the traitor's movements had been of a most stealthy and secret character, and + declared <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</a></span>that + the fact had been discovered from Faukes only with infinite difficulty, and after many + denials. It happens, however, that amongst the State Papers is preserved a pass dated + October 25th, issued by the Commissioners of the North, for Thomas Percy, posting to + Court upon the king's especial service, and charging all mayors, sheriffs, and + postmasters to provide him with three good horses all along the road.<sup><a name= + "FN304A" id="FN304A"></a><a href="#FN304">[304]</a></sup> It is manifestly absurd to + speak of secrecy or stealth in connection with such a journey, or to pretend that the + Chief Secretary of State could have any difficulty in tracing the movements of a man + who travelled in this fashion; and protestations of ignorance serve only to show that + to seem ignorant was thought desirable.</p> + + <p>Considerations like these, it will hardly be denied, countenance the notion that + Percy was, in King James's own phrase, a tame duck employed to catch wild ones. Against + such a supposition, however, a grave objection at once presents itself. Percy was + amongst the very first victims of the enterprise, being one of the four who were killed + at Holbeche when the conspirators were brought to bay.</p> + + <p>This, unquestionably, must at first sight appear to be fatal to the theory of his + complicity, and the importance of such a fact should not be extenuated. At the same + time, on further scrutiny, the argument which it supplies loses much of its force.</p> + + <p>It must, in the first place, be remembered, that according to the belief then + current, it was no uncommon thing, as Lord Castlemaine expresses it<sup><a name= + "FN305A" id="FN305A"></a><a href="#FN305">[305]</a></sup> the game being secured, to + hang the spaniel which caught <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_153" id= + "Page_153">[Pg 153]</a></span>it, that its master's art might not appear, and, to cite + no other instance, we have the example of Dr. Parry, who, as Mr. Brewer + acknowledges,<sup><a name="FN306A" id="FN306A"></a><a href="#FN306">[306]</a></sup> was + involved in the ruin of those whom he had been engaged to lure to destruction.</p> + + <p>There are, moreover, various remarkable circumstances in regard to the case of Percy + in particular. It was observed at the time as strange and suspicious that any of the + rebels should have been slain at all, for they were almost defenceless, having no + fire-arms; they did not succeed in killing a single one of their assailants, and might + all have been captured without difficulty. Nevertheless, the attacking party were not + only allowed to shoot, but selected just the wrong men as their mark, precisely those + who, being chiefly implicated in the beginnings of the Plot, could have afforded the + most valuable information,<sup><a name="FN307A" id="FN307A"></a><a href= + "#FN307">[307]</a></sup> for besides Percy, were shot down Catesby and the two + Wrights,<sup><a name="FN308A" id="FN308A"></a><a href="#FN308">[308]</a></sup> all + deeply <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[Pg + 154]</a></span>implicated from the first. So unaccountable did such a course appear as + at once to suggest sinister interpretations—especially as regarded the case of + Percy and Catesby, who were always held to be the ringleaders of the band. As Goodman + tells us,<sup><a name="FN309A" id="FN309A"></a><a href="#FN309">[309]</a></sup> "Some + will not stick to report that the great statesman sending to apprehend these traitors + gave special charge and direction for Percy and Catesby, 'Let me never see them alive;' + who it may be would have revealed some evil counsel given." A similar suspicion seems + to be insinuated by Sir Edward Hoby, writing to Edmondes, the Ambassador at + Brussels<sup><a name="FN310A" id="FN310A"></a><a href="#FN310">[310]</a></sup>: "Percy + is dead: who it is thought by some particular men could have said more than any + other."</p> + + <p>More suspicious still appears the fact that the king's government thought it + necessary to explain how it had come to pass that Percy was not secured alive, and to + protest that they had been anxious above all for his capture, but had been frustrated + by the inconsiderate zeal of their subordinates. In the "King's Book" we read as + follows: "Although divers of the King's Proclamations were posted down after those + Traitors with all speed possible, declaring the odiousness of that bloody attempt, and + the necessity to have Percy preserved alive, if it had been possible, ... yet the far + distance of the way (which was above an hundred miles), together with the extreme + deepness thereof, joined also with the shortness of the day, was <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</a></span>the cause that the hearty + and loving affection of the King's good subjects in those parts prevented the speed of + his Proclamations."</p> + + <p>Such an explanation cannot be deemed satisfactory. The distance to be covered was + about 112 miles, and there were three days to do it, for not till November 8th were the + fugitives surrounded. They in their flight had the same difficulties to contend with, + as are here enumerated, yet they accomplished their journey in a single day, and they + had not, like the king's couriers, fresh horses ready for them at every post.</p> + + <p>But we have positive evidence upon this point. Father Greenway, who was at the time + in the Midlands, close to the scene of action, incidentally mentions, without any + reference to our present question,<sup><a name="FN311A" id="FN311A"></a><a href= + "#FN311">[311]</a></sup> that while the rebels were in the field, messengers came post + haste continually, one after the other, from the capital, all bearing proclamations + mentioning Percy by name.</p> + + <p>It must also be observed that though the couriers, we are told, could not in three + days get from London to Holbeche to hinder Percy's death, they contrived to ride in one + from Holbeche to London with news that he was dead.<sup><a name="FN312A" id= + "FN312A"></a><a href="#FN312">[312]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Another circumstance not easy to explain is, that the man who killed Percy and + Catesby,<sup><a name="FN313A" id="FN313A"></a><a href="#FN313">[313]</a></sup> John + Streete by name, received for his service the handsome pension of two shillings a day + for life, equal at least to a pound of our present money.<sup><a name="FN314A" id= + "FN314A"></a><a href="#FN314">[314]</a></sup> This is certainly a large <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</a></span>reward for having done + the very thing that the government most desired to avoid, and for an action, moreover, + involving no sort of personal risk, killing two practically unarmed men from behind a + tree.<sup><a name="FN315A" id="FN315A"></a><a href="#FN315">[315]</a></sup> If, + however, he had silenced a dangerous witness, it is easy to understand the munificence + of his recompense.</p> + + <p>Against Catesby, likewise, there are serious indictments, and it seems impossible to + believe him to have been, as commonly represented, a man, however blinded by + fanaticism, yet honest in his bad enterprise, who would not stoop to fraud or untruth. + It is abundantly evident that on many occasions he deliberately deceived his + associates, and those whom he called his spiritual guides, making promises which he did + not mean to keep, and giving assurances which he knew to be false.<sup><a name="FN316A" + id="FN316A"></a><a href="#FN316">[316]</a></sup> It will be sufficient to quote one or + two examples quite sufficient to stamp him as a man utterly unscrupulous about the + means employed to gain his ends.</p> + + <p>On the 5th of November, when, after the failure of the enterprise, he arrived at + Dunchurch, in Warwickshire, Catesby, in order to induce Sir Everard Digby to commit + himself to the hopeless campaign now to be undertaken, assured him,<sup><a name= + "FN317A" id="FN317A"></a><a href="#FN317">[317]</a></sup> that though the powder was + discovered, yet the king and Salisbury were killed; all were in "a pother;" the + Catholics were sure to rise in a body, one family alone, the Littletons, would bring in + one thousand men the next day; and so on,—all <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</a></span>this being absolutely untrue. That he had + previously employed similar means on a large scale to inveigle his friends into his + atrocious and senseless scheme, there is much evidence, strongest of all that of Father + Garnet;<sup><a name="FN318A" id="FN318A"></a><a href="#FN318">[318]</a></sup> "I doubt + not that Mr. Catesby hath feigned many such things for to induce others."</p> + + <p>Worst of all, we learn from another intercepted letter of Garnet's, Catesby had for + his own purposes circulated an atrocious slander against Garnet himself, although + passing as his devoted disciple and friend: "Master Catesby," he wrote,<sup><a name= + "FN319A" id="FN319A"></a><a href="#FN319">[319]</a></sup> "did me much wrong, and hath + confessed that he told them he asked me a question in Q. Elizabeth's time of the powder + action,<sup><a name="FN320A" id="FN320A"></a><a href="#FN320">[320]</a></sup> and that + I said it was lawful. All which is most untrue. He did it to draw in others."</p> + + <p>In view of this, and much else of a similar kind, it is difficult to read Father + Gerard's <i>Narrative</i>, and more particularly Father Greenway's additions thereto, + without a growing feeling that if Catesby sought counsel it was with no intention of + being guided by it, and that his sole desire was to get hold of something which might + serve his own purposes.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</a></span></p> + + <p>We have already seen that a great deal of mystery attaches to Francis Tresham, who + is generally supposed to have written the letter to Monteagle, and was clearly + suspected by some of having done a great deal more; for the author of the + <i>Politician's Catechism</i> speaks of him as having access to Cecil's house even at + midnight, along with another whose name is not given, these two being therefore + supposed to have been the secretary's instruments in all this business. What is certain + is, that Tresham did not fly like the rest when the "discovery" had taken place, not + only remaining in London, and showing himself openly in the streets, but actually + presenting himself to the council, and offering them his services. Moreover, though his + name was known to the government, at least on November 7th, as one of the accomplices, + it was for several days omitted from their published proclamations, and not till the + 12th was he taken into custody. Being confined in the Tower, he was shortly attacked by + a painful malady, and on December 23rd he died, as was officially announced, of a + "strangury," as Salisbury assures Cornwallis "by a natural sickness, such as he hath + been a long time subject to."<sup><a name="FN321A" id="FN321A"></a><a href= + "#FN321">[321]</a></sup> Throughout his sickness he himself and his friends loudly + declared that should he survive it "they feared not the course of + justice."<sup><a name="FN322A" id="FN322A"></a><a href="#FN322">[322]</a></sup> Such + confidence, as Mr. Jardine remarks, could be grounded only on his possession of + knowledge which the authorities would not venture to reveal, and it is not surprising + that his death should have been attributed, by the enemies of the government, to + poison. It is no doubt an argument against <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_159" id= + "Page_159">[Pg 159]</a></span>such a supposition that during his illness Tresham was + allowed to be attended by his wife and a confidential servant. On the other hand, not + only does Bishop Goodman inform us<sup><a name="FN323A" id="FN323A"></a><a href= + "#FN323">[323]</a></sup> that "Butler, the great physician of Cambridge," declared him + to have been poisoned; but the author of <i>Mischeefes Mystery</i>, a violent + government partisan, contradicts the notion of a natural death, by asserting that + "Tresham murthered himself in the Tower."</p> + + <p>It thus appears, once again, that the more its details are scrutinized, the less + does the traditional history of the Plot commend itself to our acceptance. It is hard + to believe that within the ranks of the conspirators themselves, there was no + treachery, no one who, lending himself to work the ruin of his associates, unwittingly + wrought his own.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p>The evidence hitherto considered may fitly conclude with the testimony of a witness + living near the time in question, who had evidently been at pains to make inquiries + amongst those most likely to give information. This is an anonymous correspondent of + Anthony à Wood, whose notes are preserved in Fulman's collection in the library + of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. These remarkable notes have been seen by Fulman, who + inserted in the margin various questions and objections, to which the writer always + supplied precise and definite replies. In the following version this supplementary + information is incorporated in the body of his statement, being distinguished by + italics. The writer, who explains that his full materials are in the country, speaks + thus:<sup><a name="FN324A" id="FN324A"></a><a href="#FN324">[324]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</a></span></p> + + <p>"I should be glad to understand what your friend driveth at about the Fifth of + November. It was, without all peradventure, a State Plot. I have collected many + pregnant circumstances concerning it.</p> + + <p>"'Tis certain that the last Earl of Salisbury<sup><a name="FN325A" id= + "FN325A"></a><a href="#FN325">[325]</a></sup> confessed to William Lenthal<sup><a name= + "FN326A" id="FN326A"></a><a href="#FN326">[326]</a></sup> it was his father's + contrivance, which Lenthal soon after told one Mr. Webb (<i>John Webb, Esq.</i>), a + person of quality, and his kinsman, yet alive.</p> + + <p>"Sir Henry Wotton says 'twas usual with Cecil to create plots, that he might have + the honour of the discovery, or to such effect.</p> + + <p>"The Lord Mounteagle knew there was a letter to be sent to him before it came. + (<i>Known by Edmund Church, Esq., his confidant.</i>)</p> + + <p>"Sir Everard Digby's sons were both knighted soon after, and Sir Kenelm would often + say it was a State design, to disengage the king of his promise to the Pope and the + King of Spain, to indulge the Catholics if ever he came to be king here; and somewhat + to his purpose was found in the Lord Wimbledon's papers after his death.<sup><a name= + "FN327A" id="FN327A"></a><a href="#FN327">[327]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"Mr. Vowell, who was executed in the Rump time, did also affirm it so.<sup><a name= + "FN328A" id="FN328A"></a><a href="#FN328">[328]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"Catesby's man (<i>George Bartlet</i>),<sup><a name="FN329A" id= + "FN329A"></a><a href="#FN329">[329]</a></sup> on his death-bed, <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</a></span>confessed his master went + to Salisbury House several nights before the discovery, and was always brought + privately in at a back door."</p> + + <p>Then, in answer to an objection of Fulman's, is added: "Catesby, 'tis like, did not + mean to betray his friends or his own life—he was drawn in and made believe + strange things. All good men condemn him and the rest as most desperate wretches; yet + most believed the original contrivance of the Plot was not theirs."</p> + + <p>Whatever else may be thought of the above statements, they at least serve to + contradict Mr. Jardine's assertion,<sup><a name="FN330A" id="FN330A"></a><a href= + "#FN330">[330]</a></sup> that the notion of Cecil's complicity,—which he terms a + strange suggestion, scarce worthy of notice,—was first heard of long after the + transaction, and was adopted exclusively by Catholics. Clearly it was not unknown to + Protestants who were contemporaries, or personally acquainted with contemporaries, of + the event. Yet the document here cited was known to Mr. Jardine, who mentions one of + its statements, that relating to Lord Monteagle, but says nothing of its more serious + allegations.</p> + + <p>It must also be remarked that we find some traces in the evidence which remains of + certain mysterious conspirators of great importance, concerning whom no investigation + whatever appears to have been made, they being at once permitted to drop into the + profoundest obscurity, in a manner quite contrary to the habitual practice of the + authorities.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</a></span></p> + + <p>One such instance is afforded by the testimony of a mariner, Henry Paris, of + Barking,<sup><a name="FN331A" id="FN331A"></a><a href="#FN331">[331]</a></sup> that Guy + Faukes, <i>alias</i> Johnson, hired a boat of him, "wherein was carried over to + Gravelines a man supposed of great import: he went disguised, and would not suffer any + one man to go with him but this Vaux, nor to return with him. This Paris did attend for + him back at Gravelines six weeks. If cause require there are several proofs of this + matter." None of these, however, seem to have been sought.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN292" id="FN292"></a><a href="#FN292A">[292]</a></sup> + That of Mr. Pound.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN293" id="FN293"></a><a href="#FN293A">[293]</a></sup> + Jardine, <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 38, n.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN294" id="FN294"></a><a href="#FN294A">[294]</a></sup> + <i>E.g.</i>, the author of the <i>Politician's Catechism</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN295" id="FN295"></a><a href="#FN295A">[295]</a></sup> + "About the time of my Lord Essex his enterprise he became Catholic" (<i>i.e.</i> + 1601). Father Gerard, <i>Narrative</i>, p. 58.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN296" id="FN296"></a><a href="#FN296A">[296]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, n. 4.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN297" id="FN297"></a><a href="#FN297A">[297]</a></sup> + Justice Grange, of St. Giles-in-the-Fields, to Salisbury, November 5th, 1605. + Justices of Warwickshire, to the same, November 12th.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN298" id="FN298"></a><a href="#FN298A">[298]</a></sup> + MS., f. 31-32.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN299" id="FN299"></a><a href="#FN299A">[299]</a></sup> + Tanner MSS., <i>ut sup.</i>, f. 167.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN300" id="FN300"></a><a href="#FN300A">[300]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i>, November 7th, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN301" id="FN301"></a><a href="#FN301A">[301]</a></sup> + The case of Carleton is not without mystery. At the time of the discovery he was at + Paris, as secretary to the English ambassador, but about the middle of the month was + ordered home in hot haste and placed "in restraint." On February 28th, 1605-6, he + wrote to his friend Chamberlain that he was airing himself on the Chilterns to get + rid of the scent of powder, asking his correspondent to consult a patron as to his + best means of promotion (<i>Dom. James I.</i> xviii. 125). Far from being injured by + any suspicion that he might seem to have incurred, he subsequently rose rapidly in + favour, was intrusted with most important diplomatic missions, and was finally + created Viscount Dorchester.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN302" id="FN302"></a><a href="#FN302A">[302]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 105.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN303" id="FN303"></a><a href="#FN303A">[303]</a></sup> + To the ambassadors, November 9th.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN304" id="FN304"></a><a href="#FN304A">[304]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xv. 106.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN305" id="FN305"></a><a href="#FN305A">[305]</a></sup> + <i>Catholique Apology</i>, p. 415.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN306" id="FN306"></a><a href="#FN306A">[306]</a></sup> + Goodman's <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 121, note.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN307" id="FN307"></a><a href="#FN307A">[307]</a></sup> + See Goodman's remarks on this subject (<i>Court of King James</i>, i. 106). The + author of the <i>Politician's Catechism</i> writes: "It is very certaine that Percy + and Catesby might have been taken alive, when they were killed, but Cecil knew full + well that these two unfortunate Gentlemen would have related the story lesse to his + owne advantage, than himself caused it to be published: therefore they were + dispatched when they might have been made prisoners, having no other weapons, + offensive or defensive, but their swords."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN308" id="FN308"></a><a href="#FN308A">[308]</a></sup> + About the death of the Wrights there are extraordinary contradictions. In the + "original" of his famous confession T. Winter says: "The next shot was the elder + Wright, stone dead; after him the younger Mr. Wright." In <i>Mischeefes Mystery</i> + we read that Percy and Catesby were killed "with a gunne," the two Wrights "with + Halberts." The day after the attack, November 9th, Sir Edward Leigh wrote to the + Council, that the Wrights were not slain, as reputed, but wounded. Not till the 13th + was their death certified by Sir Richard Walsh.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN309" id="FN309"></a><a href="#FN309A">[309]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 106.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN310" id="FN310"></a><a href="#FN310A">[310]</a></sup> + Nichols, <i>Progresses of King James I.</i>, i. 588.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN311" id="FN311"></a><a href="#FN311A">[311]</a></sup> + MS., f. 70, b.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN312" id="FN312"></a><a href="#FN312A">[312]</a></sup> + Cecil writing to the ambassadors, November 9th, mentions in a postscript the fate of + the rebels.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN313" id="FN313"></a><a href="#FN313A">[313]</a></sup> + They were slain by two balls from the same musket.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN314" id="FN314"></a><a href="#FN314A">[314]</a></sup> + Warrant, P.R.O.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN315" id="FN315"></a><a href="#FN315A">[315]</a></sup> + Father Gerard mentions this circumstance (<i>Narrative</i>, p. 110).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN316" id="FN316"></a><a href="#FN316A">[316]</a></sup> + This point is well developed in the recent <i>Life of a Conspirator</i>, pp. + 120-126.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN317" id="FN317"></a><a href="#FN317A">[317]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 97.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN318" id="FN318"></a><a href="#FN318A">[318]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i>, March 4th, 1605-6.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN319" id="FN319"></a><a href="#FN319A">[319]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 242.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN320" id="FN320"></a><a href="#FN320A">[320]</a></sup> + The strange story of a powder-plot under Elizabeth is variously told. According to + one of the mysterious confessions attributed to Faukes, which have disappeared from + the State Papers, Owen told him in Flanders that one Thomas Morgan had proposed to + blow up her majesty (Abbot, <i>Antilogia</i>, 137). The <i>Memorial to + Protestants</i> by Bishop Kennet (1713) says that the man's name was Moody, who + wanted the French ambassador to subsidise him. The idea was to place a 20 lb. bag of + powder under the queen's bed, and explode it in the middle of the night, but how this + was to be managed is not explained.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN321" id="FN321"></a><a href="#FN321A">[321]</a></sup> + Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 189.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN322" id="FN322"></a><a href="#FN322A">[322]</a></sup> + Wood to Salisbury, December 23rd, 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN323" id="FN323"></a><a href="#FN323A">[323]</a></sup> + <i>Court of King James</i>, i. 107.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN324" id="FN324"></a><a href="#FN324A">[324]</a></sup> + <i>Collection</i>, vol. ii. 15.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN325" id="FN325"></a><a href="#FN325A">[325]</a></sup> + William, second earl (born 1591, died 1668), son of the minister of James I.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN326" id="FN326"></a><a href="#FN326A">[326]</a></sup> + Speaker of the Long Parliament.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN327" id="FN327"></a><a href="#FN327A">[327]</a></sup> + Edward Cecil, Viscount Wimbledon, third son of Thomas, first Earl of Exeter (the + elder brother of Robert Cecil, first Earl of Salisbury), died 1638.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN328" id="FN328"></a><a href="#FN328A">[328]</a></sup> + Peter Vowell, a Protestant, executed with Colonel John Gerard for an alleged plot + against Cromwell, July 10th, 1654.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN329" id="FN329"></a><a href="#FN329A">[329]</a></sup> + "George Bartlett, Mr. Catesby's servant," appears amongst the suspected persons whose + names were sent up to Cecil by the justices of Warwickshire, November 12th, 1605. + (<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 134.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN330" id="FN330"></a><a href="#FN330A">[330]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 188.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN331" id="FN331"></a><a href="#FN331A">[331]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 130.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII"></a>CHAPTER VIII.</h2> + + <h3>THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">We</span> have hitherto confined our attention to + sources of information other than those with which the authors of the official + narrative have supplied us, and upon which they based the same. It remains to inquire + how far the evidence presented by them can avail to substantiate the traditional + history, and to rebut the various arguments against its authenticity which have been + adduced.</p> + + <p>For brevity and clearness' sake it will be advisable to divide this investigation + under several heads.</p> + + <h4>i. <i>The Trial of the Conspirators.</i></h4> + + <p>On the threshold of our inquiry we are met by a most singular and startling fact. As + to what passed on the trial of the conspirators, what evidence was produced against + them, how it was supported,—nay, even how the tale of their enterprise was + told—we have no information upon which any reliance can be placed. One version + alone has come down to us of the proceedings upon this occasion—that published + "by authority"—and of this we can be sure only that it is utterly untrustworthy. + It was issued under the title of the <i>True and Perfect Relation</i>, but, as Mr. + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</a></span>Jardine has + already told us, is certainly not deserving of the character which its title imports. + "It is not true, because many occurrences on the trial are wilfully misrepresented; and + it is not <i>perfect</i>, because the whole evidence, and many facts and circumstances + which must have happened, are omitted, and incidents are inserted which could not by + possibility have taken place on the occasion. It is obviously a false and imperfect + relation of the proceedings; a tale artfully garbled and misrepresented ... to serve a + State purpose, and intended and calculated to mislead the judgment of the world upon + the facts of the case."<sup><a name="FN332A" id="FN332A"></a><a href= + "#FN332">[332]</a></sup> Again the same author remarks,<sup><a name="FN333A" id= + "FN333A"></a><a href="#FN333">[333]</a></sup> "that every line of the published trial + was rigidly weighed and considered, not with reference to its accuracy, but its effect + on the minds of those who might read it, is manifest."</p> + + <p>Moreover, the narrative thus obviously dishonest, was admittedly issued in + contradiction of divers others already passing "from hand to hand," which were at + variance with itself in points of importance, and which it stigmatized as "uncertain, + untrue, and incoherent;" it justified its appearance on the ground that it was + supremely important for the public to be rightly informed in such a case:<sup><a name= + "FN334A" id="FN334A"></a><a href="#FN334">[334]</a></sup> and so successful were the + efforts made to secure for it a monopoly, that no single document has come down to us + by which its statements <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[Pg + 165]</a></span>might be checked. In consequence, to quote Mr. Jardine once + more,<sup><a name="FN335A" id="FN335A"></a><a href="#FN335">[335]</a></sup> there is no + trial since the time of Henry VIII. in regard of which we are so ignorant as to what + actually occurred.<sup><a name="FN336A" id="FN336A"></a><a href= + "#FN336">[336]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The employment of methods such as these would in any circumstances forfeit all + credit on behalf of the story thus presented. In the present instance the presumption + raised against it is even stronger than it would commonly be. If the Gunpowder Plot + were in reality what was represented, why was it deemed necessary, in Cecil's own + phrase, to pervert and disguise its history in order to produce the desired effect? A + project so singular and diabolical in its atrocity, prepared for on so large a scale, + and so nearly successful, should, it would appear, have needed no fictitious adjuncts + to enhance its enormity; and for the conviction of miscreants caught red-handed in such + an enterprise no evidence should have been so effectual as that furnished by the facts + of the case, which of their nature should have been patent and unquestionable. When we + find, on the contrary, a web <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[Pg + 166]</a></span>of falsehood and mystery woven with elaborate care over the whole + history of the transaction, it is not unnatural to infer that to have told the simple + truth would not have suited the purpose of those who had the telling of the tale; and + it is obviously necessary that the evidence whereby their story was supported should be + rigorously sifted.</p> + + <p>What has been said, though in great measure true of the trial of Father Garnet, at + the end of March, is especially applicable to that of the conspirators, two months + earlier, for in regard of this we have absolutely no information beyond that officially + supplied. The execution of Faukes and his companions following close upon their + arraignment,<sup><a name="FN337A" id="FN337A"></a><a href="#FN337">[337]</a></sup> all + that had been elicited, or was said to have been elicited, at their trial, became + henceforth evidence which could not be contradicted, the prosecution thus having a free + hand in dealing with their subsequent victim.<sup><a name="FN338A" id= + "FN338A"></a><a href="#FN338">[338]</a></sup> In view of this circumstance it has been + noted as remarkable that whereas the conspirators had been kept alive and untried for + nearly three months, they were thus summarily dealt with at the moment when it was + known that the capture of Father Garnet was imminent, and, as a matter of fact, he was + taken on the very day on which the first company were executed.<sup><a name="FN339A" + id="FN339A"></a><a href="#FN339">[339]</a></sup> It would <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</a></span>appear that nothing + should have seemed more desirable than to confront the Jesuit superior with those whom + he was declared to have instigated to their crime, instead of putting them out of the + way at the very moment when there was a prospect of doing so.</p> + + <h4>ii. <i>The Fundamental Evidence.</i></h4> + + <p>Amongst all the confessions and "voluntary declarations" extracted from the + conspirators, there are two of exceptional importance, as having furnished the basis of + the story told by the government, and ever since generally accepted. These are a long + declaration made by Thomas Winter, and another by Guy Faukes, which alone were made + public, being printed in the "King's Book," and from which are gathered the essential + particulars of the story as we are accustomed to hear it.</p> + + <p>Of Winter's declaration, which is in the form of a letter to the Lords + Commissioners, there is found in the State Paper Office only a copy, bearing date + November 23rd, 1605, in the handwriting of Levinus Munck, Cecil's private secretary. + This copy has been shown to the King, who in a marginal note objects to a certain + "uncleare phrase," which has accordingly been altered in accordance with the royal + criticism: <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[Pg + 168]</a></span>and from it has evidently been taken the printed version, which agrees + with it in every respect, including the above-mentioned emendation of the + phraseology.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image19" id="image19"></a><img src="images/image19.png" width="600" height= + "104" alt="FROM WINTER'S CONFESSION, NOVEMBER 23." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">from winter's confession, november 23.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>It must strike the reader as remarkable that, whereas, as has been said, the body of + the letter is in the handwriting of the secretary, Munck, the names of the witnesses + who attest it<sup><a name="FN340A" id="FN340A"></a><a href="#FN340">[340]</a></sup> are + added in that of his master, Cecil himself.</p> + + <p>The "original" document, in Winter's own hand, is at Hatfield, and agrees in general + so exactly with the copy, as to demonstrate the identity of their origin.<sup><a name= + "FN341A" id="FN341A"></a><a href="#FN341">[341]</a></sup> But while, as we have seen, + the "copy" is dated November 23rd, the "original" is dated on the 25th.<sup><a name= + "FN342A" id="FN342A"></a><a href="#FN342">[342]</a></sup> On a circumstance so + singular, light is possibly thrown by a letter from Waad, the Lieutenant of the Tower, + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</a></span>to Cecil, on + the 21st of the same month.<sup><a name="FN343A" id="FN343A"></a><a href= + "#FN343">[343]</a></sup> "Thomas Winter," he wrote, "doth find his hand so strong, as + after dinner he will settle himself to write that he hath verbally declared to your + Lordship, adding what he shall remember." The inference is certainly suggested that + torture had been used until the prisoner's spirit was sufficiently broken to be ready + to tell the story required of him, and that the details were furnished by those who + demanded it. It must, moreover, be remarked that although Winter's "original" + declaration is witnessed only by Sir E. Coke, the Attorney General, it appears in print + attested by all those whom Cecil had selected for the purpose two days before the + declaration was made.<sup><a name="FN344A" id="FN344A"></a><a href= + "#FN344">[344]</a></sup> It may be said that the inference drawn above is violent and + unfair, and, perhaps, were there no other case to go upon but that of Winter, so grave + a charge as it implies should not be made. There remains, however, the companion case + of Faukes, which is yet more extraordinary.</p> + + <p>His declaration first makes its appearance as "The examination of Guy Fawkes, taken + the 8th of November."<sup><a name="FN345A" id="FN345A"></a><a href= + "#FN345">[345]</a></sup> The document thus described is manifestly a draft, and not a + copy of a deposition actually taken. It is unsigned: the list of witnesses is in the + same handwriting as the rest, and in no instance is a witness indicated by such a title + as he would employ for his signature.<sup><a name="FN346A" id="FN346A"></a><a href= + "#FN346">[346]</a></sup> Throughout this paper Faukes is made to <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</a></span>speak in the third + person, and the names of accomplices to whom he refers are not given.</p> + + <p>What, however, is most remarkable is the frank manner in which this document is + treated as a draft. Several passages are cancelled and others substituted, sometimes in + quite a contrary sense, so that the same deponent cannot possibly have made the + statements contained in both versions. Other paragraphs are "ticked off," as the event + proves, for omission.</p> + + <p>Nine days later, November 17th,<sup><a name="FN347A" id="FN347A"></a><a href= + "#FN347">[347]</a></sup> Faukes was induced to put his name to the substance of the + matter contained in the draft.<sup><a name="FN348A" id="FN348A"></a><a href= + "#FN348">[348]</a></sup> The document is headed "The declaration<sup><a name="FN349A" + id="FN349A"></a><a href="#FN349">[349]</a></sup> of Guy Fawkes, prisoner in the Tower + of London." Faukes speaks throughout in the first person, and supplies the names + previously omitted.<sup><a name="FN350A" id="FN350A"></a><a href= + "#FN350">[350]</a></sup> Most noteworthy is the manner in which this <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</a></span>version is adapted to the + emendations of the draft. The passages ticked off have disappeared entirely, amongst + them the remarkable statements that "they [the confederates] meant also to have sent + for the prisoners in the Tower, of whom particularly they had some + consultation,"—that "they had consultation for the taking of the Lady Mary [the + infant daughter of King James] into their possession"—and that "provision was + made by some of the conspiracy of armour of proof this last summer, for this action." + Where an alteration has been made in the draft, great skill is shown in combining what + is important in both versions.<sup><a name="FN351A" id="FN351A"></a><a href= + "#FN351">[351]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</a></span></p> + + <p>As to the means which were employed to compel Faukes to sign the declaration there + can be no doubt; his signature bearing evidence that he had been tortured with extreme + severity. The witnesses are but two, Coke, the Attorney General, and Waad, the + Lieutenant of the Tower. When, however, the document came to be printed, as in the + other case, a fuller list was appended, but not exactly that previously indicated, for + to Faukes were assigned the same witnesses as to Winter, including the Earls of + Worcester and Dunbar over and above his own list.<sup><a name="FN352A" id= + "FN352A"></a><a href="#FN352">[352]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c15"> + <a name="image20" id="image20"></a><img src="images/image20.png" width="300" height= + "397" alt="SIGNATURES OF FAUKES AND OLDCORNE." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">signatures of faukes and oldcorne.</span><sup><a name= + "FN353A" id="FN353A"></a><a href="#FN353">[353]</a></sup></span> + </div> + + <p>The printed version exhibits other points of interest. There was in the Archduke's + service, in Flanders, an <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[Pg + 173]</a></span>English soldier, Hugh Owen,<sup><a name="FN354A" id= + "FN354A"></a><a href="#FN354">[354]</a></sup> whom the government were for some reason, + excessively desirous to incriminate, and get into their hands. For this purpose, a + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</a></span>passage was + artfully interpolated in the statement of Faukes, whereof no trace is found in the + original. In the "King's Book," the passage in question stands thus, the words + italicised being those fraudulently introduced:</p> + + <p>"About Easter, the parliament being prorogued till October next, we dispersed + ourselves, and I retired into the Low-countries, <i>by advice and direction of the + rest; as well to acquaint Owen with the particulars of the plot, as also</i>, lest, by + my longer stay, I might have grown suspicious." But of Owen we shall see more in + particular. It must not be forgotten that on several other days besides those named + above, Faukes made declarations, still extant, viz., November 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, and + 16th, and January 9th and 20th. The most important items of information furnished by + that selected for publication were not even hinted at in any of these.</p> + + <p>Farther light appears to be thrown on the manner in which this important declaration + was prepared by another document found amongst the State Papers. This is an + "interrogatory" drawn up by Sir E. Coke on November 8th, the very day of the "draft," + expressly for the benefit of Faukes.<sup><a name="FN355A" id="FN355A"></a><a href= + "#FN355">[355]</a></sup> That the "draft" was composed from this appears to be shown by + a curious piece of evidence. We have already noticed the strange phraseology of one of + the passages attributed to Faukes: "He confesseth that the same day that this + detestable act should have been performed the same day should other of their + confederacy have surprised the person of the Lady Elizabeth," etc. <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</a></span>Precisely the same + repetition occurs in the sixth of Mr. Attorney's suggested questions. "<i>Item</i>, was + it not agreed that the same day that the act should have been done, the same day or + soon after the person of the Lady Elizabeth should have been surprised," etc.?</p> + + <p>Moreover, it is apparent that this interrogatory is not founded on information + already obtained, but is, in fact, what is known as a "fishing" document, intended to + elicit evidence of some kind. In the first place, some of its suggestions are mutually + incompatible. Thus in another place it implies that not Elizabeth but her infant sister + Mary was the choice of the queen-makers:—"Who should have been protector of the + Lady Mary, who, being born in England, they meant to prefer to the crown. With whom + should she have married?" (She was then seven months old.) Again it asks: "What should + have become of the Prince?" as though he might after all be the sovereign intended.</p> + + <p>Besides this, many points are raised which are evidently purely imaginary, inasmuch + as no more was ever heard of them though if substantiated, they would have been + supremely important.<sup><a name="FN356A" id="FN356A"></a><a href= + "#FN356">[356]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</a></span></p> + + <p>The above details will not appear superfluous if the importance of these documents + be fully understood. It is upon these narratives, stamped with features so incompatible + with their trustworthiness, that we entirely depend for much of prime importance in the + history of the conspiracy, in particular for the notable episode of the mine, which + they alone relate, and which is not even mentioned, either in the other numerous + confessions of Faukes and Winter themselves, or by any of the other confederates. Save + for an incidental remark of Keyes, that he helped to work in the mine, we hear nothing + else of it; while not only is this confession quite as strange a document as the two + others, but, to complicate the matter still more, Keyes is expressly described by + Cecil<sup><a name="FN357A" id="FN357A"></a><a href="#FN357">[357]</a></sup> himself as + one of those that "wrought not in the mine."</p> + + <p>It is hard to understand how so remarkable an operation should have been totally + ignored in all the other confessions and declarations, numerous and various as they + are; while, on the other hand, should <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_177" id= + "Page_177">[Pg 177]</a></span>this striking feature of the Plot prove to be a + fabrication, what is there of which to be certain?</p> + + <h4>iii. <i>The Confession of Thomas Bates (December 4th, 1605).</i></h4> + + <p>There is another piece of evidence to which exceptional prominence has been given, + the confession of Thomas Bates, Catesby's servant, dated December 4th, 1605. This is + the only one of the conspirators' confessions specifically mentioned in the government + account of their trial, and it is mentioned twice over—a circumstance not + unsuspicious in view of the nature of that account as already described.<sup><a name= + "FN358A" id="FN358A"></a><a href="#FN358">[358]</a></sup></p> + + <p>It is not necessary at present to enter upon the large question of the attitude of + the Jesuits towards the Plot, nor to discuss their guilt or innocence. This is, + however, beyond dispute, that the government were above all things anxious to prove + them guilty,<sup><a name="FN359A" id="FN359A"></a><a href="#FN359">[359]</a></sup> and + no document ever produced was so effective for this purpose as the said confession, + for, if it were true, there could be no question as to the guilt of one Jesuit, at + least, Father Greenway <i>alias</i> Tesimond. The substance of Bates' declaration was + as follows:</p> + + <p>That being introduced and sworn into the conspiracy by his master, Catesby, he was + then told that, as a pledge of fidelity, he must receive the sacrament upon his oath, + and accordingly he went to confession to Greenway, the Jesuit.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</a></span></p> + + <p class="c6">That in his confession he fully informed Greenway of the design, and that + Greenway bade him obey his master, because it was for a good cause, and be secret, and + mention the matter to no other priest.</p> + + <p>That he was absolved by Greenway, and afterwards received Holy Communion.</p> + + <p>It will be observed that the second paragraph, here italicized, is of supreme + importance. We have evidence that although the conspirators, during the course of their + operations, frequented the sacraments, they expressly avoided all mention of their + design to their confessors, Catesby having required this of them, assuring them that he + had fully satisfied himself that the project, far from being sinful, was meritorious, + but that the priests were likely to give trouble.<sup><a name="FN360A" id= + "FN360A"></a><a href="#FN360">[360]</a></sup> We are even told by some authors that + Catesby exacted of his confederates an oath of secrecy in this regard. It is clear that + his authority must have had special weight with his own servant, who was, moreover, + devotedly attached to his master, as he proved in the crisis of his fate. We might, + therefore, naturally be prepared to learn that Bates, though confessing to Greenway, + never acquainted him with the Plot; and, that in fact he never did so, there is some + interesting evidence.</p> + + <p>It cannot escape observation as a suspicious circumstance <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</a></span>that this most important + confession, upon which so much stress was laid, exists amongst the State Papers only in + a copy.<sup><a name="FN361A" id="FN361A"></a><a href="#FN361">[361]</a></sup> Moreover, + this copy has been treated as though it were an original, being officially endorsed, + and it has on some occasion been used in Court.<sup><a name="FN362A" id= + "FN362A"></a><a href="#FN362">[362]</a></sup> If, however, this version were not + genuine, but prepared for a purpose, it is clear that it could not have been produced + while Bates was alive to contradict it, and there appears to be no doubt that it was + not heard of till after his death.</p> + + <p>This appears, in the first place, from a manuscript account of the + Plot,<sup><a name="FN363A" id="FN363A"></a><a href="#FN363">[363]</a></sup> written + between the trial of the conspirators and that of Father Garnet, that is, within two + months of the former. The author sets himself expressly to prove that the priests must + have been cognizant of the design, for, he argues, Catholics, when they have anything + of the kind in hand, always consult their confessors about it, and it cannot be + supposed that on this occasion only did they omit to do so. In support of his + assertion, he quotes the instances of Parry, Babington, and Squires, but says nothing + of Bates. He mentions Greenway as undoubtedly one of the guilty priests, but only + because "his Majesty's proclamation so speaks it." Had the confession of Bates, as we + have it, been so prominently adduced at the trial, as the official narrative + represents, it is quite impossible that such a writer should have been content with + these feeble inferences.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</a></span></p> + + <p>Still more explicit is the evidence furnished by another MS. containing a report of + Father Garnet's trial.<sup><a name="FN364A" id="FN364A"></a><a href= + "#FN364">[364]</a></sup> In this the confession of Bates is cited, but precisely + without the significant passage of which we have spoken, as follows: "Catesby + afterwards discovered the project unto him; shortly after which discovery, Bates went + to Mass to Tesimond [Greenway], and there was confessed and had absolution."</p> + + <p>Here, again, it is impossible to suppose that the all-important point was the one + omitted. It is clear, however, that the mention of a confession made to Greenway would + <i>primâ facie</i> afford a presumption that this particular matter had been + confessed, thus furnishing a foundation whereon to build; and, knowing as we do how + evidence was manipulated, it is quite conceivable that the copy now extant incorporates + the improved version thus suggested.</p> + + <p>Such an explanation was unmistakably insinuated by Father Garnet, when, on his + trial, this evidence was urged against him; for he significantly replied that "Bates + was a dead man."<sup><a name="FN365A" id="FN365A"></a><a href="#FN365">[365]</a></sup> + Greenway himself afterwards, when beyond danger, denied on his salvation that Bates had + ever on any occasion mentioned to him any word concerning the Plot. It is still more + singular that Bates himself appears to have known nothing of his own declaration. He + had apparently said, in some examination of which no record remains, that he thought + Greenway "knew of the business." This statement he afterwards retracted as having been + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</a></span>elicited by a + vain hope of pardon, in a letter which is given in full by Father Gerard,<sup><a name= + "FN366A" id="FN366A"></a><a href="#FN366">[366]</a></sup> and of which Cecil himself + made mention at Garnet's trial.<sup><a name="FN367A" id="FN367A"></a><a href= + "#FN367">[367]</a></sup> But of the far more serious accusation we are considering he + said never a word.</p> + + <p>There is, however, evidence still more notable. On the same day, December 4th, on + which Bates made his declaration, Cecil wrote a most important letter to one + Favat,<sup><a name="FN368A" id="FN368A"></a><a href="#FN368">[368]</a></sup> who had + been commissioned by King James to urge the necessity of obtaining evidence without + delay against the priests. This document is valuable as furnishing explicit testimony + that torture was employed with this object. "Most of the prisoners," says the + secretary, "have wilfully forsworn that the priests knew anything in particular, and + obstinately refuse to be accusers of them, yea, what torture soever they be put + to."</p> + + <p>He goes on, however, to assure his Majesty that the desired object is now in sight, + particularly referring to a confession which can be none other than that of Bates, but + likewise cannot be that afterwards given to the world; for it is spoken of as affording + promise, but not yet satisfactory in its performance.</p> + + <p>"You may tell his Majesty that if he please to read privately what this day we have + drawn from a voluntary and penitent examination, the point I am persuaded (but I am no + undertaker) shall be so well cleared, if he forbear to speak much of this but few days, + as we shall see all fall out to the end whereat his Majesty shooteth."</p> + + <p>It seems clear, therefore, that the famous declaration <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</a></span>of Bates, like those of + Faukes and Winter, tends to discredit the story which in particulars so important rests + upon such evidence.</p> + + <p>It may be farther observed that if the confession of Bates, as officially preserved, + were of any worth, it would have helped to raise other issues of supreme importance. + Thus its concluding paragraph runs as follows:</p> + + <p>"He confesseth that he heard his master, Thomas Winter, and Guy Fawkes say + (presently upon the coming over of Fawkes) that they should have the sum of + five-and-twenty thousand pounds out of Spain."</p> + + <p>This clearly means that the King of Spain was privy to the design, for a sum + equivalent to a quarter of a million of our money could not have been furnished by + private persons. The government, however, constantly assured the English ambassadors + abroad of the great satisfaction with which they found that no suspicion whatever + rested upon any foreign prince.</p> + + <h4>iv. <i>Robert Winter.</i></h4> + + <p>There are various traces of foul play in regard of this conspirator in particular, + which serve to shake our confidence as to the treatment of all. Robert Winter was the + eldest brother of Thomas, and held the family property, which was considerable. Whether + this motive, as Mr. Jardine suggests, or some other, prompted the step, certain it is + that the government in their published history falsified the documents in order to + incriminate him more deeply. Faukes, in the confession of Nov. 17th, mentioned Robert + Keyes <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</a></span>as + amongst the first seven of the conspirators who worked in the mine, and Robert Winter + as one of the five introduced at a later period. The names of these two were + deliberately interchanged in the published version, Robert Winter appearing as a worker + in the mine, and Keyes, who was an obscure man of no substance, among the gentlemen of + property whose resources were to have supported the subsequent rebellion. Moreover, in + the account of the same confession sent to Edmondes by Cecil three days before Faukes + signed it (<i>i.e.</i>, Nov. 14th), the same transposition occurs, Keyes being + explicitly described as one of those "who wrought not in the mine," although, as we + have seen, he is one of the three who alone make any mention of it.</p> + + <p>Still more singular is another circumstance. About November 28th, Sir Edward Coke, + the attorney-general, drew up certain farther notes of questions to be put to various + prisoners.<sup><a name="FN369A" id="FN369A"></a><a href="#FN369">[369]</a></sup> + Amongst these we read: "Winter to be examined of his brother. For no man else can + accuse him." But a fortnight or so before this time the Secretary of State had + officially informed the ambassador in the Low Countries that Robert Winter was one of + those deepest in the treason, and, to say nothing of other evidence, a proclamation for + his apprehension had been issued on November 18th. Yet Coke's interrogatory seems to + imply that nothing had yet been established against him, and that he was not known to + the general body of the traitors as a fellow-conspirator.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</a></span></p> + + <h4>v. <i>Captain Hugh Owen, Father William Baldwin, and others.</i></h4> + + <p>We have seen something of the extreme anxiety evinced by the English government to + incriminate a certain Hugh Owen, a Welsh soldier of fortune serving in Flanders under + the archduke.<sup><a name="FN370A" id="FN370A"></a><a href="#FN370">[370]</a></sup> + With him were joined Father Baldwin, the Jesuit, and Sir William Stanley, who, like + Owen, was in the archduke's service. The measures taken in regard of them are + exceedingly instructive if we would understand upon what sort of evidence the guilt of + obnoxious individuals was proclaimed as incontrovertible.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</a></span></p> + + <p>No time was lost in commencing operations. On November 14th, three days before + Faukes signed the celebrated declaration which we have examined, and in which Owen was + not mentioned, the Earl of Salisbury wrote to Edmondes, ambassador at + Brussels,<sup><a name="FN371A" id="FN371A"></a><a href="#FN371">[371]</a></sup> that + Faukes had now directly accused Owen, whose extradition must therefore be demanded. In + proof of this assertion he inclosed a copy of the declaration, in which, however, + curiously enough, no mention of Owen's name occurs.<sup><a name="FN372A" id= + "FN372A"></a><a href="#FN372">[372]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Edmondes on his side was equally prompt. He at once laid the matter before the + archduke and his ministers, and on November 19th was able to write to Salisbury that + Owen and his secretary were apprehended and their papers and ciphers seized, and that, + "If there shall fall out matter to charge Owen with partaking in the treason, the + archduke will not refuse the king to yield him to be answerable to + justice,"<sup><a name="FN373A" id="FN373A"></a><a href="#FN373">[373]</a></sup> though + venturing to hope that he would be able to clear himself of so terrible an + accusation.</p> + + <p>On "the last of November" the subject was pursued in an epistle from the King + himself to the "Archdukes,"<sup><a name="FN374A" id="FN374A"></a><a href= + "#FN374">[374]</a></sup> <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[Pg + 186]</a></span>in which the undoubted guilt of both Owen and Baldwin was roundly + affirmed.<sup><a name="FN375A" id="FN375A"></a><a href="#FN375">[375]</a></sup></p> + + <p>On December 2nd, 1605, Salisbury wrote to Edmondes:<sup><a name="FN376A" id= + "FN376A"></a><a href="#FN376">[376]</a></sup> "I do warrant you to deliver upon the + forfeiture of my judgment in your opinion that it shall appear as evident as the sun in + the clearest day, that Baldwin by means of Owen, and Owen directly by himself, have + been particular conspirators."</p> + + <p>In spite of this, the authorities in Flanders asked for proofs of the guilt of those + whom they were asked to give up. Wherefore Edmondes wrote (December 27th) to secure the + co-operation of Cornwallis, his fellow-ambassador, at Madrid. After declaring that Owen + and Baldwin were now found to have been "principal dealers in the late execrable + treason," with remarkable <i>naïveté</i> he thus continues:<sup><a name= + "FN377A" id="FN377A"></a><a href="#FN377">[377]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"I will not conceal from your lordship that they have been here so unrespective as + to desire for their better satisfaction to have a copy of the information against the + said persons to be sent over hither; which I fear will be very displeasing to his + Majesty to understand."</p> + + <p>In January (1605-6), Salisbury sending, in the King's name, instructions to Sir E. + Coke as to the trial of the conspirators, concluded with this admonition:<sup><a name= + "FN378A" id="FN378A"></a><a href="#FN378">[378]</a></sup> "You must remember to lay + Owen as foul in this as you <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[Pg + 187]</a></span>can," which certainly does not suggest that the case against him was + overwhelmingly strong.</p> + + <p>After the execution of the traitors, an Act of Attainder passed by Parliament + included Owen amongst them.<sup><a name="FN379A" id="FN379A"></a><a href= + "#FN379">[379]</a></sup></p> + + <p>The archdukes remaining unconvinced, another and very notable argument was brought + into play. On February 12th, 1605-6, Salisbury wrote to Edmondes:<sup><a name="FN380A" + id="FN380A"></a><a href="#FN380">[380]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"As for the particular depositions against Owen and Baldwin, which the archdukes + desire to have a sight of, you may let them know that it is a matter which can make but + little to the purpose, considering that his Majesty already upon his royal word hath + certified the archdukes of their guilt."</p> + + <p>As to Owen's own papers which had been seized, the archduke assured the English + ambassador,<sup><a name="FN381A" id="FN381A"></a><a href="#FN381">[381]</a></sup> "that + if there had been anything to have been discovered out of the said papers touching the + late treason (as he was well assured of the contrary), he would not have failed to have + imparted the same to his Majesty."</p> + + <p>At a later date the Spanish minister De Grenada wrote from Valladolid<sup><a name= + "FN382A" id="FN382A"></a><a href="#FN382">[382]</a></sup> that men could not be + delivered <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</a></span>up + on mere suspicion, which might prove groundless, but that the archduke had received + orders to sift the matter to the bottom, in order that justice might be done "very + fully."</p> + + <p>About the same time President Richardot informed Edmondes<sup><a name="FN383A" id= + "FN383A"></a><a href="#FN383">[383]</a></sup> that Owen strenuously denied the charges + against him, "and that there is the more probability of his innocency for that his + papers having been carefully visited, there doth not appear anything in them to charge + him concerning the said matter."</p> + + <p>On April 21st Salisbury informed Edmondes of a conference on the subject between the + king and the archduke's ambassador.<sup><a name="FN384A" id="FN384A"></a><a href= + "#FN384">[384]</a></sup> The latter declared that his master was ready to prosecute the + accused in his own courts if evidence was furnished him, but in reply King James + explained that this was impossible, and that he "was loth to send any papers or + accusations over, not knowing how they might be framed or construed there by the + formalities of their laws." He added that it was useless now to talk of evidence, + "seeing the wretch is already condemned by the public sentence of the whole Parliament, + which sentence the archdukes might see if they would." The ambassador thereupon asked + to have a copy, but was curtly told that it would presently be printed, when he could + buy one for twelve pence and send it to his masters, but that the king was not disposed + to make a present of it.</p> + + <p>In these circumstances the archdukes determined to detain Owen no longer, and he was + presently discharged. The news of this proceeding produced a <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</a></span>remarkable change in the + tone of his accusers. On June 18th, the secretary wrote to Edmondes<sup><a name= + "FN385A" id="FN385A"></a><a href="#FN385">[385]</a></sup> that Owen's enlargement + "seemed to give too much credit to his innocency;" moreover, that "though his Majesty + showed no great disposition (for many considerations specified unto you) to send over + the papers and accusations against him, ... yet this proceeded not out of any + conscience of the invalidity of the proofs, but rather in respect that his process + being made here, and the caitiff condemned by the public sentence of the Parliament, it + would have come all to one issue, seeing they have proceeded when his Majesty left it + to themselves to do as they thought fit."</p> + + <p>To reinforce this lucid explanation Salisbury sent six days later what had before + been refused, an abstract of "confessions against Owen," and a corrected copy of the + Act of Attainder. These documents deserve some consideration.</p> + + <p>We have seen how much stress was laid upon the action of Parliament in regard of + Owen, although the Act of Attainder which it passed affords no information whatever to + assist our judgment of his case. In moving for this attainder, Sir E. Coke appeared at + the bar of the House of Commons (April 29th, 1606) to exhibit the evidence on which the + charge rested. His notes of this evidence, which are extant,<sup><a name="FN386A" id= + "FN386A"></a><a href="#FN386">[386]</a></sup> clearly show that the government + possessed no proofs at all beyond surmise and inference.<sup><a name="FN387A" id= + "FN387A"></a><a href="#FN387">[387]</a></sup> Three testimonies were cited <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</a></span>which were quite + inconsistent and mutually destructive: (1) An extract from a confession of Guy Faukes, + January 20th, 1605-6, declaring that he had himself initiated Owen in the Plot in May, + 1605. (2) An information of one Ralph Ratcliffe, to the effect that Owen and Baldwin + were busy with the Plot in April, 1604. (3) T. Winter's testimony—from his famous + confession of November 23rd, or 25th, 1605—that in the spring of 1604 Owen had + assisted him to secure the services of Faukes.</p> + + <p>In Salisbury's letter to Edmondes, the first and the last of these alone were + cited,<sup><a name="FN388A" id="FN388A"></a><a href="#FN388">[388]</a></sup> probably + because it had by this time been perceived that Ratcliffe's evidence flatly + contradicted that of Faukes.</p> + + <p>Winter's confession has already been discussed, and moreover affords no proof that + Owen was acquainted with the purpose for which the services of Faukes were required. + There remains the very circumstantial story of Faukes himself, which belongs to a + curious and interesting class of documents, containing matter of the highest + importance, whereof no trace, not even a copy, is to be found amongst the State Papers. + These comprise various confessions of Faukes, dated November 19th, 25th, and 30th, + 1605, and January 20th, 1605-6, all dealing with information of a sensational nature, + concerning which we learn nothing from the eleven depositions of the same conspirator + preserved in the Record Office.<sup><a name="FN389A" id="FN389A"></a><a href= + "#FN389">[389]</a></sup> For our knowledge of these <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_191" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</a></span>mysterious documents we have to depend on + transcripts of portions of them among the Tanner MSS. in the Bodleian Library, on + fragmentary Latin versions in the <i>Antilogia</i> of Bishop Abbot, and on the extract + cited from the last amongst them by Sir Edward Coke, which exactly agrees with that + sent by Salisbury to Edmondes, as above mentioned.</p> + + <p>It cannot escape notice that although these versions all profess to be taken from + the originals under Faukes' hand, they are so utterly different as to preclude the + belief that they have been copied from the same documents.<sup><a name="FN390A" id= + "FN390A"></a><a href="#FN390">[390]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</a></span></p> + + <p>It must farther be observed that we hear nothing of important matters contained in + these confessions till the supposed author and his confederates were all dead, whereas + these are such as would certainly have been <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_193" + id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</a></span>produced on their trial had this been + possible.<sup><a name="FN391A" id="FN391A"></a><a href="#FN391">[391]</a></sup> Some of + the evidence thus afforded is, in fact, too good, for the Government's purpose, to be + true, for if authentic, it would have secured results which, though much desired, were + never obtained. In particular it would have established beyond question the guilt of + the Jesuits abroad, and especially of Father Baldwin.<sup><a name="FN392A" id= + "FN392A"></a><a href="#FN392">[392]</a></sup> It is this Father, however, whose case + conclusively proves the utter worthlessness of the evidence. Having been proclaimed and + branded by the English government <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_194" id= + "Page_194">[Pg 194]</a></span>as a convicted traitor, he, five years later, fell into + their hands, being delivered up, in 1610, by their ally the Elector Palatine. He was at + once thrown into the Tower, where he was frequently and rigorously examined, it is said + even on the rack.<sup><a name="FN393A" id="FN393A"></a><a href="#FN393">[393]</a></sup> + After a confinement of eight years he was discharged "with honour," his innocence being + attested by the respect with which he was treated by men of all parties.<sup><a name= + "FN394A" id="FN394A"></a><a href="#FN394">[394]</a></sup> In view of this + unquestionable acquittal the famous proofs of his criminality, though certified on the + royal word of King James himself, forfeit all claim to consideration.</p> + + <p>A word may be added concerning Father Cresswell, an English Jesuit residing in + Spain. He, too, was assumed to have been deeply implicated in this and other treasons. + In November, 1605, Cecil included his name in a list of traitors against whom proofs + were to be procured.<sup><a name="FN395A" id="FN395A"></a><a href= + "#FN395">[395]</a></sup> It was even asserted that at the time of the intended + explosion he came over to England "to bear his part with the rest of his Society in a + victorial song of thanksgiving."<sup><a name="FN396A" id="FN396A"></a><a href= + "#FN396">[396]</a></sup> He was, moreover, loudly denounced as the principal agent in + the notorious Spanish Treason.</p> + + <p>After all this it is somewhat surprising to find Sir Charles Cornwallis, the English + Ambassador, while the excitement of the Powder Plot was at its height, testifying in + the most cordial terms to his esteem for the said Cresswell. The latter having been + called to Rome by his superiors, Cornwallis (December <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_195" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</a></span>23rd, N.S. 1605,) addressed to him the + following letter.<sup><a name="FN397A" id="FN397A"></a><a href= + "#FN397">[397]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"Sir, although in matter of religion well you know that there are many discords + between us, yet sure in your duty and loyalty to my King and Country I find in you so + good a concordance I cannot but much reverence and love you, and wish you all the + happiness that a man of your sort upon the earth can desire.</p> + + <p>"Much am I (I assure you) grieved at your departure, and the more that I was put in + so good hope that your journey should have been stayed. The time of the year unpleasant + to travel in, your body, as I think, not much accustomed to journeys of so great + length, and the great good you did here to your poor countrymen (which now they want) + are great motives to make your friends to wish your will in that voyage had been + broken.</p> + + <p>"If it be not, I shall not believe in words, for many here do greatly desire you for + causes spiritual, and some for temporal. In the latter number am I, who, not affecting + your spiritualities (for that these in you abound to superfluity), do much reverence + and respect your temporal abilities, as wherein I acknowledge much wisdom, temper, and + sincerity. So no friends you have shall ever more desire good unto you than myself. And + therefore I wish I were able to make so good demonstration as willingly I would that I + ever will here and in all places in this world rest</p> + + <p class="right">"Your very assured loving friend,</p> + + <p class="right">"<span class="smcap">Ch. Co.</span>"</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</a></span></p> + + <p>About the same time, in an undated letter to Lord Salisbury,<sup><a name="FN398A" + id="FN398A"></a><a href="#FN398">[398]</a></sup> Cornwallis again expresses his regret + on account of the removal of Cresswell from Spain.</p> + + <h4>vi. <i>Other Documents.</i></h4> + + <p>It is impossible to analyze in detail the evidence supplied by the several + conspirators after their capture, or to examine the endless inconsistencies and + contradictions with which it abounds. One or two points must, however, be + indicated.</p> + + <p>1. As we have seen, it is clear that at the beginning an effort was made to invest + the Plot with a far wider political significance than was afterwards attempted, and to + introduce elements which were soon quietly laid aside. In the interrogatories prepared + by Sir E. Coke and Chief Justice Popham, we find it suggested that the death of the + Earl of Salisbury was a main feature of the scheme, "absolutely agreed upon" among the + conspirators. Also that the titular Earl of Westmoreland, the titular Lord Dacre, the + Earl of Northumberland, Sir Walter Raleigh, and others were mixed up in the + business.</p> + + <p>Nor were such endeavours altogether fruitless, for, supposing the testimony extorted + from the prisoners to be worthy of credit, information was obtained altogether changing + the character and complexion of the design. This was, however, presently buried in + oblivion and treated as of no moment whatever.</p> + + <p>Thus in Sir Everard Digby's declaration of Nov. 23rd,<sup><a name="FN399A" id= + "FN399A"></a><a href="#FN399">[399]</a></sup> we find him testifying that the Earls of + Westmoreland <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[Pg + 197]</a></span>and Derby,<sup><a name="FN400A" id="FN400A"></a><a href= + "#FN400">[400]</a></sup> were to have been sent to raise forces in the north. Faukes, + in the famous confession which we have so fully discussed, was made to say "They meant + also to have sent for the prisoners in the Tower to have come to them, of whom + particularly they had some consultation," and although this important clause was + omitted from the finished version finally adopted, it appears in that of Nov. 14th, + sent by Cecil to the ambassador at Brussels. Again, in his examination of November 9th, + famous for the ghastly evidence of torture afforded by his signature, we find Faukes + declaring, "He confesseth also that there was speech amongst them to draw Sir Walter + Rawley to take part with them, being one that might stand them in good stead, <i>as + others in like sort were named</i>."<sup><a name="FN401A" id="FN401A"></a><a href= + "#FN401">[401]</a></sup></p> + + <p>With regard to Raleigh it must be remembered that he was in a very special manner + obnoxious to Salisbury, who, however, was at great pains to disguise his hostility. On + occasion of Sir Walter's trial, in 1603, he vehemently protested that it was a great + grief to him to have to pronounce against one whom he had hitherto loved.<sup><a name= + "FN402A" id="FN402A"></a><a href="#FN402">[402]</a></sup> But two years earlier, in his + secret correspondence with James, he had not only described <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</a></span>Raleigh to the future + king as one of the diabolical triplicity hatching cockatrice eggs, but had solemnly + protested that if he feigned friendship for such a wretch, it was only with the purpose + of drawing him on to discover his real nature.<sup><a name="FN403A" id= + "FN403A"></a><a href="#FN403">[403]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Even more worthy of notice is the shameless manner in which evidence was falsified. + That produced in court consisted entirely of the written depositions of the prisoners + themselves, and of those who had been similarly examined. It was, however, carefully + manipulated before it was read; all that told in favour of those whose conviction was + desired being omitted, and only so much retained as would tell against them. On this + subject Mr. Jardine well remarks:<sup><a name="FN404A" id="FN404A"></a><a href= + "#FN404">[404]</a></sup> "This mode of dealing with the admissions of an accused person + is pure and unmixed injustice; it is in truth a forgery of evidence; for when a + qualified statement is made, the suppression of the qualification is no less a forgery + than if the whole statement had been fabricated."</p> + + <p>It will be sufficient to cite one notorious and compendious <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</a></span>example. In regard of the + oath of secrecy taken by the conspirators, Faukes (Nov. 9th, 1605) and Thomas Winter + (Jan. 9th, 1605-6) related how they administered it to one another, "in a chamber," to + quote Winter, "where no other body was," and afterwards proceeded to another chamber + where they heard Mass and received Communion at the hands of Father + Gerard.<sup><a name="FN405A" id="FN405A"></a><a href="#FN405">[405]</a></sup> Both + witnesses, however, emphatically declared that the Father knew nothing of the oath that + had been taken, or of the purpose of the associates.<span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_199" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image21" id="image21"></a><img src="images/image21.png" width="600" height= + "309" alt="FROM FAUKES' CONFESSION OF NOVEMBER 9, 1605." title="" /> <span class= + "caption"><span class="smcap">from faukes' confession of november 9, + 1605.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>Such testimony in favour of one whom they were anxious above all things to + incriminate, the government would not allow to appear. Accordingly, Sir E. Coke, + preparing the documents to be used in court as evidence, marked off the exculpatory + passages, with directions that they were not to be read.<sup><a name="FN406A" id= + "FN406A"></a><a href="#FN406">[406]</a></sup> Having thus suppressed the passage which + declared that the Jesuit was unaware of the conspirators' purpose, and of their oath, + Coke went on to inform the jury, in his speech, "This oath was by Gerard the Jesuit + given to Catesby, Percy, Christopher Wright, and Thomas Winter, and by Greenwell + [Greenway] the Jesuit to Bates at another time, and so to the rest."<sup><a name= + "FN407A" id="FN407A"></a><a href="#FN407">[407]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</a></span></p> + + <p>3. Neither must it be forgotten that even apart from these manifest instances of + tampering, the confessions themselves, obtained in such circumstances, are open to much + suspicion. In an intercepted letter to Father Baldwin, of whom we have heard, Father + Schondonck, another Jesuit, then rector of St. Omers, speaks thus:<sup><a name="FN408A" + id="FN408A"></a><a href="#FN408">[408]</a></sup> "I much rejoice that, as I hear, there + is no confession produced, by which, either in court or at the place of execution, any + of our society is accused of so abominable a crime. This I consider a point of prime + importance. <i>Of secret confessions, or those extorted by violence or torture, less + account must be made; for we have many examples whereby the dishonesty of our enemies + in such matters has been fully displayed.</i>"</p> + + <p>Father John Gerard in his Autobiography<sup><a name="FN409A" id= + "FN409A"></a><a href="#FN409">[409]</a></sup> relates an experience of his own which + illustrates the methods employed to procure evidence such as was required. <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</a></span>When, in Queen + Elizabeth's time, he had himself been taken and thrown into prison, the notorious + Topcliffe, the priest-hunter, endeavoured to force him into an acknowledgment of + various matters of a treasonable character. Father Gerard undertook to write what he + had to say on the subject, and proceeded to set down an explicit denial of what his + questioner suggested. What followed he thus relates.<sup><a name="FN410A" id= + "FN410A"></a><a href="#FN410">[410]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"While I was writing this, the old man waxed wroth. He shook with passion, and would + fain have snatched the paper from me."</p> + + <p>"'If you don't want me to write the truth,' said I, 'I'll not write at all.'"</p> + + <p>"'Nay,' quoth he, 'write so and so, and I'll copy out what you have written.'"</p> + + <p>"'I shall write what I please,' I answered, 'and not what <i>you</i> please. Show + what I have written to the Council, for I shall add nothing but my name.'"</p> + + <p>"<i>Then I signed so near the writing, that nothing could be put in between.</i> The + hot-tempered man, seeing himself disappointed, broke out into threats and blasphemies: + 'I'll get you into my power, and hang you in the air, and show you no mercy: and then I + shall see what God will rescue you out of my hands.'"</p> + + <p>It was not by Catholics alone that allegations of this sort were advanced. Sir + Anthony Weldon tells us<sup><a name="FN411A" id="FN411A"></a><a href= + "#FN411">[411]</a></sup> that on the trial of Raleigh and Cobham, the latter protested + that he had never made the declaration attributed to him incriminating Raleigh. "That + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</a></span>villain + Wade,"<sup><a name="FN412A" id="FN412A"></a><a href="#FN412">[412]</a></sup> said he, + "did often solicit me, and, not prevailing, got me, by a trick, to write my name on a + piece of white paper, which I, thinking nothing, did; so that if any charge came under + my hand, it was forged by that villain Wade, by writing something above my hand, + without my consent or knowledge."</p> + + <p>Moreover, there exists undoubted evidence that the king's chief minister availed + himself upon occasion of the services of such as could counterfeit handwriting and + forge evidence against suspected persons. One Arthur Gregory<sup><a name="FN413A" id= + "FN413A"></a><a href="#FN413">[413]</a></sup> appears to have been thus employed, and + he subsequently wrote to Salisbury reminding him of what he had done.<sup><a name= + "FN414A" id="FN414A"></a><a href="#FN414">[414]</a></sup> After acknowledging that he + owes his life to the secretary who knows how to appreciate "an honest desire in respect + of his Majesty's public service," Gregory thus continues:</p> + + <p>"Your Lordship hath had a present trial of that which none but myself hath done + before, <i>to write in another man's hand</i>, and, discovering the secret writing + being in blank, to abuse a most cunning villain in his own subtlety, leaving the same + at last in blank again, wherein although there be difficulty their answers show they + have no suspicion."</p> + + <p>This the calendarer of State Papers believes to refer to the case of Father Garnet, + and it is certain from <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[Pg + 204]</a></span>Gregory's own letter that at one time he held a post in the Tower. Is it + not possible that an explanation may here be found of the strange circumstance, that + perhaps the most important of Father Garnet's examinations<sup><a name="FN415A" id= + "FN415A"></a><a href="#FN415">[415]</a></sup> bears an endorsement, "This was forbydden + by the King to be given in evidence"?</p> + + <p>Gregory's letter, of which we have been speaking, has appended to it an instructive + postscript:</p> + + <p>"Mr. Lieutenant expecteth something to be written in the blank leaf of a Latin + Bible, which is pasted in already for the purpose. I will attend it, and whatsoever + else cometh."<sup><a name="FN416A" id="FN416A"></a><a href="#FN416">[416]</a></sup></p> + + <h4>vii. <i>Catholic Testimony.</i></h4> + + <p>It will not improbably be urged that the government history is confirmed in all + essential particulars by authorities to whom no exception can be taken, namely, + contemporary Catholic writers, and especially the Jesuits Gerard and Greenway, whose + narratives of the conspiracy corroborate every detail concerning which doubts have been + insinuated.</p> + + <p>This argument is undoubtedly deserving of all consideration, but upon examination + appears to lose much of its force. If the narratives in question agree with that + furnished by the government, it is because they are based almost entirely upon it, and + upon those published confessions of Winter and Faukes with which we are familiar.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</a></span></p> + + <p>On this point Father Gerard is very explicit:<sup><a name="FN417A" id= + "FN417A"></a><a href="#FN417">[417]</a></sup> "Out of [Mr. Thomas Winter's] + examination, with the others that were made in the time of their imprisonment, I must + gather and set down all that is to be said or collected of their purposes and + proceedings in this heady enterprize. For that, as I have said, they kept it so wholly + secret from all men, that until their flight and apprehension it was not known to any + that such a matter was in hand, and then there could none have access to them to learn + the particulars. But we must be contented with that which some of those that lived to + be examined, did therein deliver. Only for that some of their servants that were up in + arms with them in the country did afterwards escape, somewhat might be learned by them + of their carriage in their last extremities, and some such words as they then uttered, + whereby their mind in the whole matter is something the more opened."</p> + + <p>Elsewhere he writes, exhibiting more confidence in government documents than we can + feel:<sup><a name="FN418A" id="FN418A"></a><a href="#FN418">[418]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"[The prisoners'] examinations did all agree in all material points, and therefore + two only were published in print, containing the substance of the rest. And indeed + [this is] the sum of that which I have been able to say in this narration touching + either their first intentions or the names or number of the conspirators, or concerning + the course they took to keep the matter so absolutely secret, or, finally, touching the + manner of their beginning and proceeding in the whole matter; for that—as I noted + before—it being kept a vowed secret in the heads and hearts of so few, and those + also <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[Pg + 206]</a></span>afterwards apprehended before they could have means to declare the + particulars in any private manner, therefore no more can be known of the matter or + manner of this tragedy than is found or gathered out of their examinations."</p> + + <p>As for Greenway, it should not be forgotten that for the most part he confined + himself to translating Gerard's narrative from English into Italian, though he + supplemented it occasionally with items furnished by his own experience as to the + character and general conduct of the conspirators on previous occasions, or during + their last desperate rally. Of this he was able to speak with more authority, as he not + only chanced to be in the immediate neighbourhood, but actually visited them at + Huddington House (the seat of Robert Winter) on November 6th, being summoned thither by + Catesby through his servant Bates.<sup><a name="FN419A" id="FN419A"></a><a href= + "#FN419">[419]</a></sup> Greenway, like Gerard, constantly refers to the published + confessions of Winter and Faukes as the sources of his information.</p> + + <p>It may here be observed that the practical identity <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_207" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</a></span>of the narratives of these two fathers was + unknown to Mr. Jardine, who having seen only that of Father Greenway, and believing it + to be an original work, founded upon this erroneous assumption an argument which loses + its force when we learn the real author to have been Gerard. Mr. Jardine maintains that + the narrator must, from internal evidence, have been an active and zealous member of + the conspiracy, "approving, promoting and encouraging it with the utmost + enthusiasm."<sup><a name="FN420A" id="FN420A"></a><a href="#FN420">[420]</a></sup> It + so happens, however, that the real author, Father Gerard, is just the one of the + incriminated Jesuits whose innocence is held by historians certainly not partial to his + Order, to be beyond question. Mr. Gardiner considers<sup><a name="FN421A" id= + "FN421A"></a><a href="#FN421">[421]</a></sup> that there is "strong reason" to believe + him not to have been acquainted with the Plot. Dr. Jessopp is still more emphatic, and + declares<sup><a name="FN422A" id="FN422A"></a><a href="#FN422">[422]</a></sup> + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</a></span>that it is + impossible for any candid reader of all the evidence to doubt that Gerard must be + exonerated.</p> + + <p>What has been said of Gerard and Greenway may serve also for Father Garnet, who in + his various examinations and other utterances assumes the truth of the government + story, for neither had he materials to go upon except those officially supplied.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p>It is obvious that the conclusion to be drawn from the above considerations is + chiefly negative. That the conspirators embarked on a plot against the state, is, of + course unquestionable. What was the precise nature of that plot is by no means clear, + and still less what were the exact circumstances of its initiation and its collapse. + This only appears to be certain, that things did not happen as they were officially + related, while the elaborate care expended on the falsification of the story seems to + indicate that the true version would not have served the purposes to which that story + was actually put.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN332" id="FN332"></a><a href="#FN332A">[332]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 235. Mr. Jardine is here speaking expressly of the trial + of Father Garnet, as reported in the book, but evidently intends his observations to + extend to that of the conspirators as well.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN333" id="FN333"></a><a href="#FN333A">[333]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> 105.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN334" id="FN334"></a><a href="#FN334A">[334]</a></sup> + <i>True and Perfect Relation</i>, Introduction.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN335" id="FN335"></a><a href="#FN335A">[335]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 113.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN336" id="FN336"></a><a href="#FN336A">[336]</a></sup> + The contemporary, Hawarde (<i>Les Reportes del Cases in Camera Stellata</i>) gives a + report of the trial of the conspirators, under the curious title "<i>Al le + arraignemente del Traitors por le grande treason of blowinge up the Parliamente + Howse</i>," which, although evidently based upon the official account, differs in two + remarkable particulars. In the first place it gives a different list of the + commissioners by whom the trial was conducted, omitting Justice Warburton, and + including instead, Lord Chief Baron Flemming, Justices Yelverton and Williams, and + Baron Saville. Moreover, Hawarde says that the king and queen "were both there in + pryvate," an important circumstance, of which the <i>True and Perfect Relation</i> + says nothing.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN337" id="FN337"></a><a href="#FN337A">[337]</a></sup> + Viz., on January 30th and 31st: not January 31st and February 1st, as Mr. Gardiner + has it.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN338" id="FN338"></a><a href="#FN338A">[338]</a></sup> + Father Garnet clearly believed that this advantage was used unscrupulously against + him, for when certain evidence attributed to Bates was cited, he replied that "Bates + was a dead man," and would testify otherwise if he were alive. (Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. + 21203. <i>Foley's Records</i>, iv. p. 188.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN339" id="FN339"></a><a href="#FN339A">[339]</a></sup> + It is frequently said that the search at Hendlip was undertaken not for Garnet but + for Oldcorne, whose presence there was known by the confession of Humphrey Littleton. + But this confession was made several days after the search had been begun, and the + directions for it given by Cecil to the sheriff, Sir H. Bromley, clearly indicate + that he had in view some capture of prime importance. (See Gardiner's <i>History</i>, + i. 271, and Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. 6178, f. 693.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN340" id="FN340"></a><a href="#FN340A">[340]</a></sup> + Viz.: Nottingham, Suffolk, Worcester, Devonshire, Northampton, Salisbury, Marr, + Dunbar, Popham, Coke, and Waad.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN341" id="FN341"></a><a href="#FN341A">[341]</a></sup> + In the "original," however, there are some passages which do not appear in the copy, + notably one in which Lord Monteagle is mentioned. It appears, therefore, that the + "copy" is not the first version produced, but has been edited from another still + earlier.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN342" id="FN342"></a><a href="#FN342A">[342]</a></sup> + That this is not a slip of the pen is evidenced by the fact that Winter first wrote + 23, and then corrected it to 25.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN343" id="FN343"></a><a href="#FN343A">[343]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. 6178, 84.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN344" id="FN344"></a><a href="#FN344A">[344]</a></sup> + The document is headed in the printed version: "Thomas Winter's Confession, taken the + Twenty-third of November, 1605, in the Presence of the Counsellors, whose Names are + underwritten."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN345" id="FN345"></a><a href="#FN345A">[345]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 49.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN346" id="FN346"></a><a href="#FN346A">[346]</a></sup> + The list stands thus: "L. Admyrall—L. Chamberlayn—Erle of + Devonshire—Erle of Northampton—Erle of Salisbury—Erle of + Marr—L. Cheif Justice—attended by Mr. Attorney Generall."</p> + + <p>The Lord Admiral was the Earl of Nottingham, better known as Lord Howard of + Effingham, the commander-in-chief against the Spanish Armada. There appears to be no + foundation for the supposition that he was a Catholic. Northampton (Henry Howard) was + a professing Catholic. The chamberlain was the Earl of Suffolk, the Chief Justice, + Popham.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN347" id="FN347"></a><a href="#FN347A">[347]</a></sup> + The <i>Calendar of State Papers</i> assigns this document, like the other, to the + 8th, a mistake not easy to understand, for not only is the date clearly written, but + the printed version in the "King's Book" gives it correctly.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN348" id="FN348"></a><a href="#FN348A">[348]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 101.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN349" id="FN349"></a><a href="#FN349A">[349]</a></sup> + This was originally written "deposition;" the title is altered in Coke's hand, who + also added the words, "taken the 17 of Nov. 1605: acknowledged before the Lords + Commissioners."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN350" id="FN350"></a><a href="#FN350A">[350]</a></sup> + Thus the <i>examination</i> of November 8th begins as follows: "He confesseth that a + Practise in generall was first broken unto him, agaynst his Majesty, for the + Catholique cause, and not invented, or propounded by himself: and this was first + propounded unto him, about Easter last was twelvemonth, beyond the seas, in the Low + Countreyes, by an English Lay-man, and that English man came over with him in his + company, into England, and they tow and three more were the first five, mencioned in + the former examination," etc.</p> + + <p>The <i>declaration</i> of November 17th opens: "I confesse that a practise in + general was first broken unto me against his Majesty, for releife of the Catholique + cause, and not invented or propounded by myself. And this was first propounded unto + me about Easter last was twelvemonth, beyond the Seas, in the Low Countries of the + Archdukes obeysance, by Thomas Winter, who came thereupon with me into England, and + there wee imparted our purpose to three other Englishmen more, namely Rob<sup>t</sup> + Catesby, Tho<sup>s</sup> Percy, and John Wright, who all five consulting together," + etc. See both documents in full, Appendix N.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN351" id="FN351"></a><a href="#FN351A">[351]</a></sup> + Thus, in the confession of November 8th, we read as follows: "He confesseth, that it + was resolved amonge them, that the same day that this detestable act should have been + performed, the same day [<i>sic</i>] should other of their confederacye have + surprised the person of the Lady Elizabeth and presently have proclaimed her queen + [to which purpose a Proclamation was drawne, as well to avow and justifye the Action, + as to have protested against the Union, and in noe sort to have meddled with Religion + therein. And would have protested all soe against all strangers,] and this + Proclamation should have been made in the name of the Lady Elizabeth."</p> + + <p>The portion within brackets is cancelled, and the following substituted: "He + confesseth that if their purpose had taken effect, untill they had power enough, they + would not have avowed the deed to be theirs; but if their power ... had been + sufficient, they thereafter would have taken it upon them."</p> + + <p>The corresponding portion of the declaration of November 17th runs thus: "It was + further resolved amongst us, that the same day that this action should have been + performed, some other of our confederates should have surprised the person of the L. + Elizabeth, the King's eldest daughter, ... and presently proclaimed her for Queene, + having a <i>project</i> of a Proclamation ready for the purpose, wherein we made no + mention of altering of Religion, nor would have avowed the deed to be ours, untill we + should have had power enough to make our partie good, and then we would have avowed + both."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN352" id="FN352"></a><a href="#FN352A">[352]</a></sup> + The printed version of Fauke's declaration is headed: "The true Copy of the + Deposition of Guido Fawkes, taken in the Presence of the Counsellors, whose Names are + under written."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN353" id="FN353"></a><a href="#FN353A">[353]</a></sup> + See Appendix K., <i>The Use of Torture</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN354" id="FN354"></a><a href="#FN354A">[354]</a></sup> + In the <i>Calendar of State Papers</i> he is continually styled "Father Owen," or + "Owen the Jesuit," without warrant in the original documents. That he was a soldier + and not a priest there is no doubt.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN355" id="FN355"></a><a href="#FN355A">[355]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 38.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN356" id="FN356"></a><a href="#FN356A">[356]</a></sup> + E.g. <i>Item.</i> Where you have confessed that it was discoursed between you that + the prisoners in the Tower should have had intelligence after the act done, declare + the particularity of that discourse, and whether some prisoners in the Tower should + not have been called to office or place, or have been employed, etc.</p> + + <p><i>Item.</i> Where you have confessed that the L. Elizabeth should have succeeded, + and that she should have been brought up as a Catholic, and married to an English + Catholic. (1) Who should have had the government of her? (2) Who was nominated to be + the fittest to have married her?</p> + + <p><i>Item.</i> Was it not resolved amongst you that after the act done you would + have taken the Tower, or any other place of strength, and meant you not to have taken + the spoil of London, and whom should you have instantly proclaimed?</p> + + <p><i>Item.</i> By what priests or Jesuits were you resolved that it was godly and + lawful to execute the act?</p> + + <p><i>Item.</i> Whether was it not resolved that if it were discovered Catesby and + others should have killed the king coming from Royston?</p> + + <p><i>Item.</i> Were not Edw. Neville, calling himself Earl of Westmorland, Mr. + Dacre, calling himself Lord Dacre, or any of the Nobility, privy to it? How many of + the Nobility have you known at Mass? What persons in the Tower were named to be + partakers with you?</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN357" id="FN357"></a><a href="#FN357A">[357]</a></sup> + To Edmondes, November 14th, 1605. (Stowe MSS.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN358" id="FN358"></a><a href="#FN358A">[358]</a></sup> + <i>Viz., The True and Perfect Relation.</i> The confession of Bates is mentioned but + not textually quoted. It is in the "King's Book" that the confessions of Winter and + Faukes are given.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN359" id="FN359"></a><a href="#FN359A">[359]</a></sup> + "The great object of the government now was to obtain evidence against the + priests."—Gardiner, <i>History of England</i>, i. 267.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN360" id="FN360"></a><a href="#FN360A">[360]</a></sup> + See Rokewood's examination, December 2nd, 1605. (<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 136.) In + the confession of Keyes, November 30th, 1605 (<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 126) we + read: "He sayth that the reason that he revealed not the project to his ghostly + father was for that Catesby told him that he had good warrant and authoritie that it + might safely and with good conscience be done," etc.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN361" id="FN361"></a><a href="#FN361A">[361]</a></sup> + <i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 145.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN362" id="FN362"></a><a href="#FN362A">[362]</a></sup> + This is shown by a mark (§) in the margin opposite the important passage, + attention being called to this by the same mark, and the name "Greenway" in the + endorsement.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN363" id="FN363"></a><a href="#FN363A">[363]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus., Harleian 360, f. 96.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN364" id="FN364"></a><a href="#FN364A">[364]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus., Harleian 360, f. 109, etc. The reporter had clearly been present.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN365" id="FN365"></a><a href="#FN365A">[365]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus., MSS. Add. 21, 203; Plut. ciii. F. Printed by Foley, <i>Records</i>, iv. + 164 <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN366" id="FN366"></a><a href="#FN366A">[366]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i>, p. 210.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN367" id="FN367"></a><a href="#FN367A">[367]</a></sup> + Plut. ciii. F. § 39.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN368" id="FN368"></a><a href="#FN368A">[368]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus. MSS. Add. 6178, § 625.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN369" id="FN369"></a><a href="#FN369A">[369]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 116.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN370" id="FN370"></a><a href="#FN370A">[370]</a></sup> + In the <i>Calendar of State Papers</i>, Mrs. Everett Green, as has been said, quite + gratuitously and without warrant from the original documents, uniformly describes him + as "Father Owen," or "Owen the Jesuit." Mr. Gardiner (<i>Hist.</i> i. 242) has been + led into the same error.</p> + + <p>It is not impossible that Owen had some knowledge of the conspiracy, though the + course adopted by his enemies seems to afford strong presumption to the contrary. It + must, moreover, be remembered that, as Father Gerard tells us, he and others + similarly accused, vehemently protested against the imputation, while in his case in + particular we have some evidence to the same effect. Thomas Phelippes, the + "Decipherer," of whom we have already heard, was on terms of close intimacy with + Owen, and in December, 1605, wrote to him about the Plot in terms which certainly + appear to imply a strong conviction that his friend had nothing to do with it.</p> + + <p>"There hath been and yet is still great paynes taken to search to the bottom of + the late damnable conspiracy. The Parliamente hit seemes shall not be troubled with + any extraordinarie course for their exemplarye punishment, as was supposed upon the + Kinges speeche, but onlye with their attaynder, the more is the pitye I + saye."—<i>Dom. James I.</i> xvii. 62.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN371" id="FN371"></a><a href="#FN371A">[371]</a></sup> + Stowe MSS. 168, 54.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN372" id="FN372"></a><a href="#FN372A">[372]</a></sup> + This version of the deposition is interesting as being a form intermediate between + the draft of November 8th and the finished document of November 17th. The passages + cancelled in the former are simply omitted without any attempt to complete the sense + of the passages in which they occurred. Those "ticked off" are retained.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN373" id="FN373"></a><a href="#FN373A">[373]</a></sup> + Stowe MSS. 168, 58.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN374" id="FN374"></a><a href="#FN374A">[374]</a></sup> + <i>I.e.</i>, the Archduke Albert, and his consort the Infanta, daughter of Philip + II., who, as governors of the Low Countries, were usually so designated.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN375" id="FN375"></a><a href="#FN375A">[375]</a></sup> + "Nous avons bien voulu aussy par ces presentes, nous mesmes vous asseurer que ce + qu'il [Edmondes] vous en a desja declaré, est fondé sur tout + verité; et vous dire en oultre, que ces meschantes Creatures d'Owen et + Baldouin, gens de mesme farine, ont eu aussi leur part en particulier a ceste + malheureuse conspiration de Pouldre."—<i>Phillipps' MS.</i> 6297, f. 129.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN376" id="FN376"></a><a href="#FN376A">[376]</a></sup> + Stowe, 168, 65.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN377" id="FN377"></a><a href="#FN377A">[377]</a></sup> + Winwood, ii. 183.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN378" id="FN378"></a><a href="#FN378A">[378]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xix. 94.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN379" id="FN379"></a><a href="#FN379A">[379]</a></sup> + 3<sup>o</sup> <i>Jac. I.</i> c. 3. On the 21st of June following, Salisbury forwarded + to Edmondes a fresh copy of this Act, "because in the former there was a great error + committed in the printing." (Phillipps, f. 157.) It would be highly interesting to + know what the first version was. In that now extant it is only said regarding Owen, + that inasmuch as he obstinately keeps beyond the seas, he cannot be arraigned, nor + can evidence and proofs be produced against him. (<i>Statutes at large.</i>)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN380" id="FN380"></a><a href="#FN380A">[380]</a></sup> + Stowe, 168, 76; Phillipps, f. 141.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN381" id="FN381"></a><a href="#FN381A">[381]</a></sup> + Edmondes to Salisbury, January 23rd, 1605(6). P.R.O., Flanders, 38.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN382" id="FN382"></a><a href="#FN382A">[382]</a></sup> + April 19th, 1606, <i>ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN383" id="FN383"></a><a href="#FN383A">[383]</a></sup> + Edmondes to Salisbury, April 5th, 1606, <i>ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN384" id="FN384"></a><a href="#FN384A">[384]</a></sup> + Phillipps, f. 150.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN385" id="FN385"></a><a href="#FN385A">[385]</a></sup> + Phillipps, f. 152.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN386" id="FN386"></a><a href="#FN386A">[386]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xx. 52.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN387" id="FN387"></a><a href="#FN387A">[387]</a></sup> + This is obvious from a marginal note in Coke's own hand, arguing that Owen must be + guilty in this instance, as he has been guilty on former occasions, and "Qui semel + malus est semper præsumitur esse malus in eodem genere mali."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN388" id="FN388"></a><a href="#FN388A">[388]</a></sup> + It will be noticed that the confession of Faukes cited against Owen is dated two + months after he had first been declared to be proved guilty by Faukes' testimony.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN389" id="FN389"></a><a href="#FN389A">[389]</a></sup> + These are dated November 5th, 6th [bis], 7th, 8th [the "draft"], 9th, 16th, 17th, + January 9th, 20th, 26th.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN390" id="FN390"></a><a href="#FN390A">[390]</a></sup> + Thus, to confine ourselves to the confession of January 20th, with which we are + particularly concerned, we have the following variations:</p> + + <p><i>Tanner transcript.</i> "At my going over M<sup>r</sup> Catesby charged me two + things more: the one to desire of Baldwin & M<sup>r</sup> Owen to deal with the + Marquis [Spinola] to send over the regiment of which he [Catesby] expected to have + been Lieutenant Colonel under Sir Charles [Percy].... He wished me secondly to be + earnest with Baldwin to deal with the Marquis to give the said M<sup>r</sup> Catesby + order for a Company of Horse, thinking by that means to have opportunity to buy + Horses and Arms without suspition."</p> + + <p>According to <i>Abbot</i>, Faukes was to give instructions that when the time of + Parliament approached, Sir Wm. Stanley was on some pretext to lead the English forces + in the archduke's service towards the sea, and with them any others he could manage + to influence. He also mentions the conspiracy of Morgan, as spoken of by Coke.</p> + + <p>In addition to all this, Abbot cites from the same confession the following + extraordinary particulars (p. 160): Faukes, when he came to London, with T. Winter, + went to Percy's house and found there Catesby and Father Gerard. They talked over + matters, and agreed that nothing was to be hoped from foreign aid, nor from a general + rising of Catholics, and that the only plan was to strike at the king's person: + whereupon Catesby, Percy, John Wright, Winter, and himself, were sworn in by + Gerard.</p> + + <p>[This is in absolute contradiction to Winter's evidence (November 23rd) that Percy + was initiated in the middle of the Easter term, the other four having agreed on the + scheme at the beginning of the same term; and to that of Faukes himself (November + 17th) that he and Winter first resolved on a plot for the benefit of the Catholic + cause, and afterwards imparted their idea to Catesby, Wright, and Percy.]</p> + + <p><i>Sir E. Coke's Version.</i> "After the powder treason was resolved upon by + Catesbye, Thomas Winter, the Wrightes, my self, and others, and preparation made by + us for the execution of it, by their advise and direction I went into fflanders and + had leave given unto me to discover our project in every particular to Hughe Owen and + others, but with condicion that they should sweare first to secrecie as we our selves + had done. When I arryved in fflanders I found M<sup>r</sup> Owen at Bruxelles to whom + after I had given the oathe of secrecye I discovered the whole busines, howe we had + layed 20 whole barrells of powder in the celler under the parliament howse, and howe + we ment to give it fire the first day of the parliament when the King, the prince, + the duke, the Lords spirituall and temporall, and all the knights, citizens, and + burgesses of parliament should be there assembled. And that we meant to take the + Ladye Elizabeth and proclaime hir for we thought most like that the prince and duke + would be there with the king. M<sup>r</sup> Owen liked the plott very well, and said + that Thomas Morgan had once propounded the very same in quene Elizabeth's time, and + willed me that by ani meanes we should not make any mencion of religion at the first, + and assured me that so soone as he should have certaine newes that this exploit had + taken effect that he would give us what assistance he could and that he would procure + that Sir W<sup>m</sup> Stanley should have leave to come with those English men which + be there and what other forces he could procure."</p> + + <p>The confession of Faukes in the Record Office, dated the same, January 20th, is + thus summarized in the <i>Calendar of State Papers</i> (<i>Dom. James I.</i> xviii. + 28): "Talked with Catesby about noblemen being absent from the meeting of Parliament; + he said Lord Mordaunt would not be there, because he did not like to absent himself + from the sermons, as the king did not know he was a Catholic; and that Lord Stourton + would not come to town till the Friday after the opening."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN391" id="FN391"></a><a href="#FN391A">[391]</a></sup> + The powder design of Morgan is an instance in point. The Thomas Morgan in question + was doubtless the same as the partisan of Mary Queen of Scots.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN392" id="FN392"></a><a href="#FN392A">[392]</a></sup> + <i>E.g.</i>: "Winter came over to Owen, by him and the Fathers to be informed of a + fit and resolute man for the execution of the enterprise. This examinate (being by + the Fathers and Owen recommended to be used and trusted in any action for the + Catholicks) came into England with Winter."—Faukes, November 19th, 1605 (Tanner + MSS.).</p> + + <p>Abbot, whose whole object is to incriminate the Jesuits, does not mention this + remarkable statement.</p> + + <p>Again we read, November 30th (<i>ibid.</i>): "Father Baldwin told this examinate + that about 2,000 horses would be provided by the Catholicks of England to join with + the Spanish forces ... and willed this examinate to intimate so much to Father + Creswell, which this examinate did."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN393" id="FN393"></a><a href="#FN393A">[393]</a></sup> + Oliver, <i>Collectanea</i>, sub nom.; Foley, <i>Records</i>, iv. 120, note.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN394" id="FN394"></a><a href="#FN394A">[394]</a></sup> + Foley, <i>Records</i>, iii. 509; <i>English Protestants' Plea</i>, p. 59.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN395" id="FN395"></a><a href="#FN395A">[395]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 115.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN396" id="FN396"></a><a href="#FN396A">[396]</a></sup> + <i>England's Warning Peece</i>, by T. S. [Thomas Spencer], P.73.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN397" id="FN397"></a><a href="#FN397A">[397]</a></sup> + Cotton MSS. <i>Vespasian C.</i>, ix. f. 259.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN398" id="FN398"></a><a href="#FN398A">[398]</a></sup> + Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, ii. 178.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN399" id="FN399"></a><a href="#FN399A">[399]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvi. 104.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN400" id="FN400"></a><a href="#FN400A">[400]</a></sup> + William Stanley.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN401" id="FN401"></a><a href="#FN401A">[401]</a></sup> + The last words are added in another hand.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN402" id="FN402"></a><a href="#FN402A">[402]</a></sup> + "I am in great dispute with myself to speak in the case of this gentleman. A former + dearness between me and him tied so firm a knot of my conceit of his virtues, now + broken by discovery of his imperfections, that I protest, did I serve a king that I + knew would be displeased with me for speaking, in this case I would speak, whatever + came of it; but seeing he is compacted of piety and justice, and one that will not + mislike of any man for speaking a truth, I will answer," etc.—<i>State + Trials.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN403" id="FN403"></a><a href="#FN403A">[403]</a></sup> + "For this do I profess in the presence of Him that knoweth and searcheth all men's + harts, that if I did not some tyme cast a stone into the mouth of these gaping + crabbs, when they are in their prodigall humour of discourses, they wold not stick to + confess dayly how contrary it is to their nature to be under your soverainty; though + they confess (Ralegh especially) that (<i>rebus sic stantibus</i>) naturall pollicy + forceth them to keep on foot such a trade against the great day of mart. In all which + light and soddain humours of his, though I do no way check him, because he shall not + think I reject his freedome or his affection ... yet under pretext of extraordinary + care of his well doing, I have seemed to dissuade him from ingaging himself so farr," + etc.—<i>Hatfield MSS.</i>, cxxxv. f. 65.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN404" id="FN404"></a><a href="#FN404A">[404]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. 358.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN405" id="FN405"></a><a href="#FN405A">[405]</a></sup> + Father Gerard (<i>Narrative</i>, p. 201) denies in the most emphatic terms that he + was the priest who said mass on this occasion. The point is fully discussed by the + late Father Morris, S. J., in his Life of Father Gerard, pp. 437-438.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN406" id="FN406"></a><a href="#FN406A">[406]</a></sup> + The accompanying facsimile of this portion of Faukes' confession exhibits the marks + made by Coke, and his added direction in the margin, <i>hucusque</i> ("thus far"). In + the original his additions are in red ink.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN407" id="FN407"></a><a href="#FN407A">[407]</a></sup> + It is singular that he should not mention Faukes himself as one of those who received + the oath from Gerard. There is no mention in any document of Greenway as giving the + oath to Bates, or anyone else.</p> + + <p>The facsimile of Faukes' signature, appended to his confession of November 9th, + though affording unmistakable evidence of torture, gives no idea of the original, + wherein the letters are so faintly traced as to be scarcely visible. It is evident + that the writer had been so severely racked as to have no strength left in his hands + to press the pen upon the paper. He must have fainted when he had written his + Christian name, two dashes alone representing the other.</p> + + <p>This signature, with other of the more sensational documents connected with the + Plot, is exhibited in the newly established museum at the Record Office.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN408" id="FN408"></a><a href="#FN408A">[408]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xviii. 97, February 27th, 1606, N. S. (Latin).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN409" id="FN409"></a><a href="#FN409A">[409]</a></sup> + <i>Narratio de rebus a se in Anglia gestis</i> (Stonyhurst MSS.). Published in Father + G. R. Kingdon's translation under the title of <i>During the Persecution</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN410" id="FN410"></a><a href="#FN410A">[410]</a></sup> + <i>During the Persecution</i>, p. 83.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN411" id="FN411"></a><a href="#FN411A">[411]</a></sup> + <i>Court and Character of King James</i>, p. 350 (ed. 1811).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN412" id="FN412"></a><a href="#FN412A">[412]</a></sup> + Sir William Waad, Lieutenant of the Tower, to whose charge the Powder Plot + conspirators were committed, was afterwards dismissed from his office on a charge of + embezzling the jewels of the Lady Arabella Stuart.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN413" id="FN413"></a><a href="#FN413A">[413]</a></sup> + Presumably the same Arthur Gregory who at an earlier period had counterfeited the + seals of Mary Queen of Scots' correspondence.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN414" id="FN414"></a><a href="#FN414A">[414]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> xxiv. 38.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN415" id="FN415"></a><a href="#FN415A">[415]</a></sup> + March 3rd, 1605-6 (Hatfield MSS.).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN416" id="FN416"></a><a href="#FN416A">[416]</a></sup> + Eudaemon Joannes cites the renegade Alabaster as testifying to having seen a letter + seemingly of his own to Garnet, which he had never written. (<i>Answer to + Casaubon</i>, p. 159.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN417" id="FN417"></a><a href="#FN417A">[417]</a></sup> + <i>Narrative</i>, p. 54.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN418" id="FN418"></a><a href="#FN418A">[418]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i> p. 113.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN419" id="FN419"></a><a href="#FN419A">[419]</a></sup> + Though we have not now to consider the question of Father Greenway's connection with + the conspirators, it may not be out of place to cite his own account of this visit + (<i>Narrative</i>, Stonyhurst MSS., f. 86 b):</p> + + <p>"Father Oswald [Greenway] went to assist these gentlemen with the Sacraments of + the Church, understanding their danger and their need, and this with evident danger + to his own person and life: and all those gentlemen could have borne witness that he + publicly told them how he grieved not so much because of their wretched and shameful + plight, and the extremity of their peril, as that by their headlong course they had + given the heretics occasion to slander the whole body of Catholics in the kingdom, + and that he flatly refused to stay in their company, lest the heretics should be able + to calumniate himself and the other Fathers of the Society."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN420" id="FN420"></a><a href="#FN420A">[420]</a></sup> + In this, as in some other respects, Mr. Jardine shows himself rather an advocate than + an impartial historian. He holds that the complicity of the writer of the + <i>Narrative</i> with the plotters is proved by the intimate knowledge he displays + concerning them, "their general conduct—their superstitious fears—their + dreams—'their thick coming fancies'—in the progress of the work of + destruction." (<i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. xi.)</p> + + <p>There is here an evident allusion to the silly story of the "bell in the wall" + (related by Greenway and not by Gerard), to which Mr. Jardine gives extraordinary + prominence. He does not, however, inform us that Greenway relates this + (<i>Narrative</i>, f. 58 b) and some similar matters, on the authority of "an + acquaintance to whom Catesby told it shortly before his death," and that he leaves it + to the judgment of his readers.</p> + + <p>Greenway's frequent and earnest protestations of innocence Mr. Jardine summarily + dismisses with the observation that they are "entitled to no credit whatever" (p. + xii).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN421" id="FN421"></a><a href="#FN421A">[421]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, i. 243.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN422" id="FN422"></a><a href="#FN422A">[422]</a></sup> + <i>Dictionary of National Biography</i> (Digby, Sir E.).</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX"></a>CHAPTER IX.</h2> + + <h3>THE SEQUEL.</h3> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">As</span> we have already seen, the Gunpowder Plot + formed no exception to the general law observable in conspiracies of its period, + proving extremely advantageous to those against whom it was principally directed. No + single individual was injured by it except those concerned in it, or accused of being + so concerned. On the other hand, it marked an epoch in public policy, and irrevocably + committed the king and the nation to a line of action towards Catholics, which up to + that time they had hoped, and their enemies had feared, would not be permanently + pursued.</p> + + <p>"The political consequences of this transaction," says Mr. Jardine,<sup><a name= + "FN423A" id="FN423A"></a><a href="#FN423">[423]</a></sup> "are extremely important and + interesting. It fixed the timid and wavering mind of the king in his adherence to the + Protestant party, in opposition to the Roman Catholics; and the universal horror, which + was naturally excited not only in England but throughout Europe by so barbarous an + attempt, was artfully converted into an engine for the suppression of the Roman + Catholic Church: so that the ministers of James I., having procured the reluctant + acquiescence of the king, and the cordial assent of public opinion, were enabled to + continue in full force <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[Pg + 210]</a></span>the severe laws previously passed against Papists, and to enact others + of no less rigour and injustice."</p> + + <p>Such was the effect in fact produced, and the calm deliberation displayed in dealing + with the crisis appears to indicate that no misgivings were entertained as to the + chance of anything but advantage resulting from it. We have already seen with what + strange equanimity the presence of the powder beneath the Parliament House was treated. + Not less serene was the attitude of the minister chiefly responsible for the safety of + the State in face of the grave dangers still declared to be threatening, even after the + "discovery." Preparations, it was officially announced, had been made for an extensive + rising of the Catholics, and this had still to be reckoned with. As the king himself + informed Sir John Harington, the design was not formed by a few, the "whole legion of + Catholics" were implicated: the priests had been active in preaching the holy war, and + the Pope himself had employed his authority on behalf of the cause.<sup><a name= + "FN424A" id="FN424A"></a><a href="#FN424">[424]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Moreover, the conspirators, except Faukes, escaped from London, and hurried to the + intended scene of action, where, though no man voluntarily joined them, they were able + at first to collect a certain force of their own retainers and domestics, and began to + traverse the shires in which their influence was greatest, committing acts of plunder + and violence, and calling on all men to join them for God and the country. For a couple + of days the local magistrates did not feel strong enough to cope with them, and + forwarded to the capital reports capable, it might be <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_211" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</a></span>supposed, of alarming those who were + bewildered by so totally unexpected an assault, for which the evidence in hand showed + preparations of no ordinary magnitude to have been made. The numbers of the insurgents, + it was said, were constantly increasing; only a feeble force could be brought against + them; they were seizing horses and ammunition, and all this in "a very Catholic + country."</p> + + <p>In his famous speech to Parliament, delivered on November 9th, the king dwelt + feelingly on the danger of the land, left exposed to the traitors, in the absence of + the members of the legislature, its natural guardians. "These rebels," he + declared,<sup><a name="FN425A" id="FN425A"></a><a href="#FN425">[425]</a></sup> "that + now wander through the country could never have gotten so fit a time of safety in their + passage, or whatsoever unlawful actions, as now; when the country, by the aforesaid + occasions, is, in a manner, left desolate and waste unto them."<sup><a name="FN426A" + id="FN426A"></a><a href="#FN426">[426]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Meanwhile, however, the secretary remained imperturbably tranquil as before, and so + well aware of the true state of the case that he could afford to make merry over the + madcap adventurers. On the same 9th of November he wrote to the ambassadors: "It is + also thought fit that some martial men should presently repair down to those countries + where the Robin Hoods are assembled, to encourage the good and to terrify the bad. In + which service the Earl of Devonshire <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_212" id= + "Page_212">[Pg 212]</a></span>is used, a commission going forth for him as general: + although I am easily persuaded that this Faggot will be burnt to ashes before he shall + be twenty miles on his way."</p> + + <p>His prescience was not at fault, for before despatching the letter the minister was + able to announce the utter collapse of the foolish and unsupported enterprise.</p> + + <p>No time was lost in turning the defeated conspiracy to practical account. On the + very 5th of November<sup><a name="FN427A" id="FN427A"></a><a href= + "#FN427">[427]</a></sup> itself the Commons proceeded, before all other business, to + the first reading of a bill for the better execution of penal statutes against + Recusants. On the following day this was read a second time. The house next met on the + 9th, to hear the king's speech, and was then prorogued to January 21st following. On + that day, the foremost article on the programme was the first reading of a bill + (whether the same or another) for the better execution of penal statutes; another was + likewise proposed for prevention of the danger of papistical practices; and a committee + was appointed "to consider of some course for the timely and severe proceeding against + Jesuits, Seminaries, and other popish agents and practisers, and for the prevention and + suppression of their plots and practices."<sup><a name="FN428A" id= + "FN428A"></a><a href="#FN428">[428]</a></sup> On the 22nd there was a motion directed + against the seminaries beyond the seas, and the bill for better execution of penal + statutes was read a second time. On the 23rd the bill for a public thanksgiving was + read twice, being finally <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[Pg + 213]</a></span>passed on the 25th. Its preamble runs thus: "Forasmuch as ... no nation + of the earth hath been blessed with greater benefits than this kingdom now enjoyeth, + having the true and free profession of the gospel under our most gracious sovereign + lord King James, the most great, learned, and religious king that ever reigned therein + ... the which many malignant and devilish papists, Jesuits, and seminary priests, much + envying and fearing, conspired most horribly ..." and so forth.</p> + + <p>Thus did the Commons set to work, and the other House, though they declined to + sanction all that was proposed in the way of exceptional severity towards the actual + conspirators, were no wise lacking in zeal against the Catholic body.</p> + + <p>The course of legislation that ensued is thus described by Birch:<sup><a name= + "FN429A" id="FN429A"></a><a href="#FN429">[429]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"The discovery of the Plot occasioned the Parliament to enjoin the oath of + allegiance to the king, and to enact several laws against Popery, and especially + against the Jesuits and Priests who, as the Earl of Salisbury observed,<sup><a name= + "FN430A" id="FN430A"></a><a href="#FN430">[430]</a></sup> sought to bring all things + into <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[Pg + 214]</a></span>confusion.... In passing these laws for the security of the Protestant + religion, the Earl of Salisbury exerted himself with distinguished zeal and vigour, + which gained him great love and honour from the kingdom, as appeared, in some measure, + in the unusual attendance upon him at his installation into the Order of the Garter, on + the 20th of May, 1606,<sup><a name="FN431A" id="FN431A"></a><a href= + "#FN431">[431]</a></sup> at Windsor."</p> + + <p>It is, indeed, abundantly clear that beyond all others this statesman benefited by + the Plot, in consequence of which he obtained, at least for a time, a high degree of + both power and popularity. His installation at Windsor, above mentioned, was an almost + regal triumph. Baker notes<sup><a name="FN432A" id="FN432A"></a><a href= + "#FN432">[432]</a></sup> that he was attended on the occasion "beyond ordinary + promotion." Howes writes<sup><a name="FN433A" id="FN433A"></a><a href= + "#FN433">[433]</a></sup> that he "set forward from his house in the Strand, being + almost as honourably accompanied, and with as great a train of lords, knights, + gentlemen, and officers of the Court, with others besides his peculiar servants, very + richly attired and bravely mounted, as was the King when he rid in state through + London."</p> + + <p>Neither were there wanting to the secretary other advantages which, if less showy, + were not less substantial. <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[Pg + 215]</a></span>It will be remembered how, in his secret correspondence with the King of + Scots before the death of Elizabeth, Cecil had constantly endeavoured to turn the mind + of his future sovereign against the Earl of Northumberland, whom he declared to be + associated with Raleigh and Cobham in a "diabolical triplicity," and to be "a sworn + enemy of King James."<sup><a name="FN434A" id="FN434A"></a><a href= + "#FN434">[434]</a></sup> These <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_216" id= + "Page_216">[Pg 216]</a></span>efforts had not been altogether successful, and though + Cobham and Raleigh had been effectually disposed of in connection with the conspiracy + known as the "Main," Northumberland was still powerful, and was thought by many to be + Cecil's most formidable rival. As one result of the Gunpowder Plot, he now disappeared + for ever from public life.</p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image22" id="image22"></a><img src="images/image22.png" width="600" height= + "566" alt="THE POWDER PLOT. III." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">the powder plot. iii.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>When we remember the terms in which the secretary had previously described him, as + well as the result about to ensue, it is not a little startling to remark with what + emphasis it was protested, in season and out, that a ruling principle of the + government's action was to do nothing which might even seem to cast a slur upon the + earl's character, while at the same time the very point is artfully insinuated which + was to be turned against him.<sup><a name="FN435A" id="FN435A"></a><a href= + "#FN435">[435]</a></sup> Thus in the "King's Book," in explanation of the curious + roundabout courses adopted in connection with the "discovery," we are told that a + far-fetched excuse was devised for the search determined upon, lest it might "lay an + ill-favoured imputation upon the Earl of Northumberland, one of his Majesty's greatest + subjects and counsellors; this Thomas Percy being his kinsman and most confident + familiar." So again Cecil wrote to the ambassadors: "It hath been thought meet in + policy of State (all circumstances considered) to commit the Earl of Northumberland + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</a></span>to the + Archbishop of Canterbury, there to be honourably used, until things be more quiet. + Whereof if you shall hear any judgment made, as if his Majesty or his council could + harbour a thought of such a savage practice to be lodged in such a nobleman's breast, + you shall do well to suppress it as a malicious discourse and invention, this being + only done to satisfy the world that nothing be undone which belongs to policy of State, + when the whole monarchy was proscribed to dissolution; and being no more than himself + discreetly approved when he received the sentence of the council for his + restraint."</p> + + <p>Yet what was the issue? A series of charges were brought against Northumberland, all + of which broke down except that of having, as Captain of the Royal Pensioners, admitted + Percy amongst them without exacting the usual oath. He in vain demanded an open trial, + and was brought before the Star Chamber, by which, after he had been assailed by Coke + in the same violent strain previously employed against Raleigh, he was sentenced to + forfeit all offices which he held under the Crown, to be imprisoned during the king's + pleasure, and to pay a fine of £30,000, equal to at least ten times that sum at + the present day.</p> + + <p>As if this were not enough, fresh proceedings were taken against him six years + later, when he was again subjected to examination, and again, says + Lingard,<sup><a name="FN436A" id="FN436A"></a><a href="#FN436">[436]</a></sup> foiled + the ingenuity or malice of his persecutor.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</a></span></p> + + <p>It seems, therefore, by no means extraordinary that men, as we have heard from the + French ambassador, should have commonly attributed the earl's ruin to the resolution of + his great rival to remove from his own path every obstacle likely to be dangerous, or + that Cecil should himself bear witness,<sup><a name="FN437A" id="FN437A"></a><a href= + "#FN437">[437]</a></sup> in 1611, to the "bruites" touching Northumberland which were + afloat, and should be anxious, as "knowing how various a discourse a subject of this + nature doth beget," to "prevent any erroneous impression by a brief narrative of the + true motive and progress of the business."</p> + + <p>As to Northumberland's own sentiments, he, we are told by Osborne,<sup><a name= + "FN438A" id="FN438A"></a><a href="#FN438">[438]</a></sup> declared that the blood of + Percy would refuse to mix with that of Cecil if they were poured together in the same + basin.</p> + + <p>It is, moreover, evident not only that the great statesman, to use Bishop Goodman's + term, actually profited largely by the powder business, but that from the first he saw + in it a means for materially strengthening his position; an opportunity which he lost + no time in turning to account by making it appear that in such a crisis he was + absolutely necessary to the State. This is shown by the remarkable manifesto which he + promptly issued, a document which appears to have been almost forgotten, though well + deserving attention.</p> + + <p>A characteristic feature of the traitorous proceedings of the period was the + inveterate habit of conspirators to drop compromising documents in the street, or to + throw <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</a></span>them + into yards and windows. In the court of Salisbury House was found, in November, 1605, a + threatening letter, more than usually extraordinary. It purported to come from five + Catholics, who began by unreservedly condemning the Gunpowder Plot as a work abhorred + by their co-religionists as much as by any Protestants. Since, however, his lordship, + beyond all others, seemed disposed to take advantage of so foul a scandal, in order to + root out all memory of the Catholic religion, they proceeded to warn him that they had + themselves vowed his death, and in such fashion that their success was certain. None of + the accomplices knew who the others were, but it was settled who should first make the + attempt, and who, in order, afterwards. Moreover, death had no terrors for any of them, + two being stricken with mortal sickness, which must soon be fatal; while the other + three were in such mental affliction as not to care what became of them.</p> + + <p>As a reply to this strange effusion Cecil published a tract,<sup><a name="FN439A" + id="FN439A"></a><a href="#FN439">[439]</a></sup> obviously intended as a companion to + the famous "King's Book," in which with elaborate modesty he owned to the impeachment + of being more zealous than others in the good cause, and protested his resolution, at + whatever peril to himself, to continue his services to <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_220" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</a></span>his king and country. The sum and substance + of this curious apology is as follows.</p> + + <p>Having resolved to recall his thoughts from the earthly theatre to higher things, + which statesmen are supposed overmuch to neglect, he had felt he could choose no better + theme for his meditations than the "King's Book," wherein so many lively images of + God's great favour and providence are represented, every line discovering where + Apelles' hand hath been; so that all may see there needs now no Elisha to tell the King + of Israel what the Aramites do in their privatest councils.</p> + + <p>While in this most serious and silent meditation, divided between rapture at God's + infinite mercy and justice, and thought of his own happiness to live under a king + pleasing to God for his zealous endeavours to cleanse the vessels of his kingdom from + the dregs and lees of the Romish grape,—and while his heart was not a little + cheered to observe any note of his own name in the royal register, for one that had + been of any little use in this so fortunate discovery,—as the poor day labourer + who taketh contentment when he passeth that glorious architecture, to the building + whereof he can remember to have carried some few sticks and stones,—while thus + blissfully engaged, he is grieved to find himself singled out from the honourable body + of the council,—why, he knows not, for with it he would be content to be + identified—as the author of the policy which is being adopted; and, conscious + that in his humble person the Body of Authority is assailed, he thinks it well, for + once, to make a reply.</p> + + <p>Having recited the threatening letter in full, he presently continues:</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</a></span></p> + + <p>"Though I participate not in the follies of that fly who thought herself to raise + the dust because she sat on the chariot-wheel, yet I am so far from disavowing my + honest ambition of my master's favour, as I am desirous that the world should hold me, + not so much his creature, by the undeserved honours I hold from his grace and power, as + my desire to be the shadow of his mind, and to frame my judgment, knowledge, and + affections according to his. Towards whose Royal Person I shall glory more to be always + found an honest and humble subject, than I should to command absolutely in any other + calling."</p> + + <p>Of those who threaten him he says very little, assuming, however, as self-evident, + that they are set on by some priest, who, after the manner of his tribe, doth "carry + the unlearned Catholics, like hawks hooded, into those dangerous positions."</p> + + <p>But, as for himself, let the world understand that he is not the man to neglect his + duty on account of the personal danger it entails. "Far I hope it shall be from me, who + know so well in whose <span class="smcap">Holy Book</span> my days are numbered, once + to entertain a thought to purchase a span of time, at so dear a rate, as for the fear + of any mortal power, in my poor talent, <i>Aut Deo, aut Patriæ, aut Patri + patriæ deesse</i>."<sup><a name="FN440A" id="FN440A"></a><a href= + "#FN440">[440]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</a></span></p> + + <p>In spite of the singular ability of this manifesto, the art of the writer is + undoubtedly somewhat too conspicuous to permit us to accept it as the kind of document + which would be produced by one who felt himself confronted by a serious peril. An + interesting and most pertinent commentary is supplied by a contemporary Jesuit, Giles + Schondonck, Rector of St. Omers College, in a letter to Father Baldwin, the same of + whom we have already heard in connection with the Plot.<sup><a name="FN441A" id= + "FN441A"></a><a href="#FN441">[441]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Schondonck has, he says, read and re-read Cecil's book, which Baldwin had lent him. + If his opinion be required, he finds in it many flowers of wit and eloquence, and it is + a composition well adapted for its object; but the original letter which has evoked + this brilliant rejoinder is a manifest fraud, not emanating from any Catholic, but + devised by the enemies of the Church for her injury. The writers plainly contradict + themselves. They begin by denouncing the Powder Plot as impious and abominable, and + they do so most righteously, and they declare its authors to have been turbulent + spirits and not religious, in which also they are right. But they go on to approve the + design of murdering Cecil. What sense is there in this? If the one design be impious + and detestable, with what <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[Pg + 223]</a></span>colour or conscience can the other be approved? There is no difference + of principle, though in the one case many were to be murdered, in the other but a + single man. No one having in him any spark of religion could defend either project, + much less approve it. Moreover, much that is set down is simply ridiculous. Men in the + last extremity of sickness, or broken down by sorrow, are not of the stuff whereof + those are made by whom desperate deeds are done.</p> + + <p>From another Jesuit we obtain instructive information which at least serves to show + what was the opinion of Catholics as to the way in which things were being managed. + This is conveyed in a letter addressed December 1st, 1606, to the famous Father Parsons + by Father Richard Blount, Father Garnet's successor as superior of the English + mission.<sup><a name="FN442A" id="FN442A"></a><a href="#FN442">[442]</a></sup> It must + be remembered that this was not meant for the public eye, and in fact was never + published. It cannot have been intended to obtain credence for a particular version of + history, and it was written to him who, of all men, was behind the scenes so far as the + English Jesuits were concerned. Much of it is in cipher which, fortunately, has been + interpreted for us by the recipient.</p> + + <p>Blount begins with a piece of intelligence which is startling enough. Amongst the + lords of the council none was a more zealous enemy of Popery than the chamberlain, the + Earl of Suffolk,<sup><a name="FN443A" id="FN443A"></a><a href="#FN443">[443]</a></sup> + who was more than once on the commission for expelling priests and Jesuits, and had in + particular been so energetic in the matter of the Powder Plot that Salisbury modestly + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</a></span>confessed + that in regard of the "discovery" he had himself been "much less forward."<sup><a name= + "FN444A" id="FN444A"></a><a href="#FN444">[444]</a></sup> Now, however, we are told, + only a twelvemonth later, that this nobleman and his wife are ready for a sufficient + fee to procure "some kind of peace" for the Catholics. The needful sum may probably be + raised through the Spanish Ambassador, but the issue is doubtful "because Salisbury + will resist."—"Yet such is the want of money with the chamberlain at this + time—whose expenses are infinite—that either Salisbury must supply, or else + he must needs break with him."<sup><a name="FN445A" id="FN445A"></a><a href= + "#FN445">[445]</a></sup></p> + + <p>After some particulars concerning the jealousy against the Scots, and the matter of + the union (which "sticketh much in the Parliament's teeth") Blount goes on to relate + how Cecil has been attempting to float a second Powder Plot—the scene being this + time the king's court itself. He has had another letter brought in, to set it going, + and had seemingly calculated on capturing the writer himself and some of his brethren + in connection with it. In this, however, he has been foiled, and the matter appears to + have been dropped. In Blount's own words:<sup><a name="FN446A" id="FN446A"></a><a href= + "#FN446">[446]</a></sup></p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</a></span></p> + + <p>"Now these last days we expected some new stratagem, because Salisbury pretended a + letter to be brought to his lordship found by chance in St. Clement's Churchyard, + written in ciphers, wherein were many persons named, and a question asked, whether + there were any concavity under the stage in the court. But belike the device failed, + and so we hear no words of it. About this time this house was ransacked, where by + chance Blount came late the night before, finding four more, Talbot, N. Smith, Wright, + Arnold; being all besieged from morning to night. If things had fallen out as was + expected, then that letter would have haply been spoken of, whereas now it is very + secret, and only served to pick a thanks of King James, with whom Salisbury keepeth his + credit by such tricks, as upon whose vigilancy his majesty's life dependeth."</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p>One other feature of the after history demands consideration. As Fuller tells + us,<sup><a name="FN447A" id="FN447A"></a><a href="#FN447">[447]</a></sup> "a learned + author, making mention of this treason, breaketh forth into the following rapture:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">'Excidat illa dies aevo, ne postera credant<br /> + Saecula; nos certe taceamus, et obruta multâ<br /> + Nocte tegi propriae patiamur crimina gentis.'<br /> + </p> + + <p class="ni">'Oh, let that day be quite dashed out of time,<br /> + <span class="c10">And not believ'd by the next generation;</span><br /> + In night of silence we'll conceal the crime,<br /> + <span class="c10">Thereby to save the credit of the nation.'"</span></p> + </blockquote> + + <p>"A wish," he adds, "which in my opinion, hath more of poetry than of piety therein, + and from which I must be <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[Pg + 226]</a></span>forced to dissent." Assuredly if it were judged that silence and + oblivion should be the lot of the conspiracy, no stranger means were ever adopted to + secure the desired object. A public thanksgiving was appointed to be held every year, + on the anniversary of the "discovery;" a special service for that day was inserted in + the Anglican liturgy, and Gunpowder Plot Sermons kept the memory of the Treason green + in the mind not of one but of many generations.</p> + + <p>Moreover, the country was flooded with literature on the subject, in prose and + rhyme, and the example of Milton is sufficient to show how favourite a topic it was + with youthful poets essaying to try their wings.<sup><a name="FN448A" id= + "FN448A"></a><a href="#FN448">[448]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In regard of the history, one line was consistently adopted. The Church of England + in its calendar marked November 5th, as the <i>Papists' Conspiracy</i>, and in the + collect appointed for the day the king and estates of the realm were described as being + "by Popish treachery appointed as sheep to the slaughter, in a most barbarous and + savage manner, beyond the examples of former ages." Similarly, preachers and writers + alike concurred in saying little or nothing about the actual conspirators, but much + about the iniquity of Rome; the official character of the Plot, and its sanction, even + its first suggestion, by the highest authorities of the Church, being the chief feature + of <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</a></span>the tale + hammered year after year into the ears of the English people. The details of history + supplied are frequently pure and unmixed fables.<sup><a name="FN449A" id= + "FN449A"></a><a href="#FN449">[449]</a></sup></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image23" id="image23"></a><img src="images/image23.png" width="600" height= + "646" alt="THE POWDER PLOT. IV." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">the powder plot. iv.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>Nor was the pencil less active than the pen in popularizing the same belief. Great + was the ingenuity spent in devising and producing pictures which should impress + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</a></span>on the minds + of the most illiterate a holy horror of the Church which had doomed the nation to + destruction. One of the most elaborate of these was headed by an inscription which + admirably summarizes the moral of the tale.</p> + + <p><span class="smcap">The Powder Treason.</span>—Propounded by <i>Satan</i>: + Approved by <i>Antichrist</i> [<i>i.e.</i> the Pope]: Enterprised by <i>Papists</i>: + Practized by <i>Traitors</i>: Revealed by an <i>Eagle</i> [Monteagle]: Expounded by an + <i>Oracle</i> [King James]: Founded in <i>Hell</i>: Confounded in <i>Heaven</i>.</p> + + <p>Accordingly we find representations of Lucifer, the Pope, the King of Spain, the + General of the Jesuits, and other such worthies, conspiring in the background while the + redoubtable Guy walks arm in arm with a demon to fire the mine, the latter grasping a + papal Bull (unknown to the Bullarium), expedited to promote the project: or again, + Faukes and Catesby stand secretly conspiring in the middle of the street, while Father + Garnet, in full Jesuit habit (or what is meant for such) exhorts them to go on: or a + priest gives the conspirators "the sacrament of secrecy;" or representative Romish + dignitaries blow threats and curses against England and her Parliament House,—or + the Jesuits are buried in Hell in recompense of their perfidy.</p> + + <p>It cannot, however, escape remark that while the limners have been conscientiously + careful in respect of these details, they have one and all discarded accuracy in regard + of another matter in which we might naturally have expected it. In no single instance + is Guy Faukes represented as about to blow up the right house. Sometimes it is the + House of Commons that he is going to destroy, more frequently the Painted <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[Pg 229]</a></span>Chamber, often a + nondescript building corresponding to nothing in particular,—but in no single + instance is it the House of Lords.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_230" id= + "Page_230">[Pg 230]</a></span></p> + + <div class="figcenter c7"> + <a name="image24" id="image24"></a><img src="images/image24.png" width="600" height= + "770" alt="THE POWDER PLOT. V." title="" /> <span class="caption"><span class= + "smcap">the powder plot. v.</span></span> + </div> + + <p>The most extraordinary instance of so strange a vagary is afforded by a plate + produced immediately after the occurrence it commemorates, in the year 1605 + itself.<sup><a name="FN450A" id="FN450A"></a><a href="#FN450">[450]</a></sup> In this, + Faukes with his inseparable lantern, but without the usual spurs, is seen advancing to + the door of the "cellar," which stands conspicuous above ground. Aloft is seen the + crescent moon, represented in exactly the right phase for the date of the + discovery.<sup><a name="FN451A" id="FN451A"></a><a href="#FN451">[451]</a></sup> The + accuracy exhibited as to this singular detail makes it more than ever extraordinary + that the building to which he directs his steps is unquestionably St. Stephen's + Chapel—The House of Commons.</p> + + <p>One point of the history, in itself apparently insignificant, was at the time + invested with such extravagant importance, as to suggest a question in its regard, + namely the day itself whereon the marvellous deliverance took place. A curious + combination of circumstances alone assigned it to the notorious Fifth of November. + Parliament, as we have seen, was originally appointed to meet on the 3rd of October, + but was suddenly adjourned for about a month, and so little reason did there seem to be + for the prorogation<sup><a name="FN452A" id="FN452A"></a><a href= + "#FN452">[452]</a></sup> as to <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_231" id= + "Page_231">[Pg 231]</a></span>fill the conspirators with alarm lest some suspicion of + their design had prompted it; wherefore they sent Thomas Winter to attend the + prorogation ceremony, and observe the demeanour of those who took part in it. + Afterwards, though the discovery might have easily been made any time during the + preceding week, nothing practical was done till the fateful day itself had actually + begun, when, as the acute Lingard has not failed to observe, a remarkable change at + once came over the conduct of the authorities, who discarding the aimless and dilatory + manner of proceeding which had hitherto characterized them, went straight to the point + with a promptitude and directness leaving nothing to be desired.</p> + + <p>Whatever were their motive in all this, the action of the government undoubtedly + brought it about that the great blow should be struck on a day which not a little + enhanced the evidence for the providential character of the whole affair. Tuesday was + King James' lucky day, more especially when it happened to be the 5th of the month, for + on Tuesday, August the 5th, 1600, he had escaped the mysterious treason of the + Gowries.</p> + + <p>This coincidence evidently created a profound impression. "Curious folks observe," + wrote Chamberlain to Carleton,<sup><a name="FN453A" id="FN453A"></a><a href= + "#FN453">[453]</a></sup> "that this deliverance happened on the fifth of November, + answerable to the fifth of August, both Tuesdays; and this plot to be executed by + Johnson [the assumed name of Faukes], and that at Johnstown [<i>i.e.</i>, Perth]." On + the 27th of November, Lake <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[Pg + 232]</a></span>suggested to the Archbishop of Canterbury,<sup><a name="FN454A" id= + "FN454A"></a><a href="#FN454">[454]</a></sup> that as a perpetual memorial of this so + providential circumstance, the anniversary sermon should always be delivered upon a + Tuesday. Two days later, the Archbishop wrote to his suffragans,<sup><a name="FN455A" + id="FN455A"></a><a href="#FN455">[455]</a></sup> reminding them how on a Tuesday his + majesty had escaped the Gowries, and now, on another Tuesday, a peril still more + terrible, which must have ruined the whole nation, had not the Holy Ghost illumined the + king's heart with a divine spirit. In remembrance of which singular instance of God's + governance, there was to be an annual celebration.<sup><a name="FN456A" id= + "FN456A"></a><a href="#FN456">[456]</a></sup></p> + + <p>Most important of all, King James himself much appreciated the significance of this + token of divine protection, and not only impressed this upon his Parliament, but + proroguing it forthwith till after Christmas, selected the same propitious day of the + week for its next meeting, as a safeguard against possible danger. "Since it has + pleased God," said his majesty,<sup><a name="FN457A" id="FN457A"></a><a href= + "#FN457">[457]</a></sup> "to grant me two such notable deliveries upon one day of the + week, which was Tuesday, and likewise one day of the month, which was the fifth, + thereby to teach me that as it was the same devil that still persecuted me, so it was + one and the same God that still mightily delivered me, I thought it therefore not + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[Pg 233]</a></span>amiss, that + the twenty-first day which fell to be upon Tuesday, should be the day of meeting of + this next session of parliament, hoping and assuring myself, that the same God, who + hath now granted me and you all so notable and gracious a delivery, shall prosper all + our affairs at that next session, and bring them to an happy conclusion."</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p>Whatever may be thought of this particular element of its history, it is perfectly + clear that the fashion in which the Plot was habitually set before the English people, + and which contributed more than anything else to work the effect actually produced, was + characterized from the first by an utter disregard of truth on the part of those whose + purposes it so opportunely served, and with such lasting results.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[Pg 234]</a></span></p> + + <h4><span class="smcap">A Summary.</span></h4> + + <p>The evidence available to us appears to establish principally two points,—that + the true history of the Gunpowder Plot is now known to no man, and that the history + commonly received is certainly untrue.</p> + + <p>It is quite impossible to believe that the government were not aware of the Plot + long before they announced its discovery.</p> + + <p>It is difficult to believe that the proceedings of the conspirators were actually + such as they are related to have been.</p> + + <p>It is unquestionable that the government consistently falsified the story and the + evidence as presented to the world, and that the points upon which they most insisted + prove upon examination to be the most doubtful.</p> + + <p>There are grave reasons for the conclusion that the whole transaction was + dexterously contrived for the purpose which in fact it opportunely served, by those who + alone reaped benefit from it, and who showed themselves so unscrupulous in the manner + of reaping.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN423" id="FN423"></a><a href="#FN423A">[423]</a></sup> + <i>Criminal Trials</i>, ii. I.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN424" id="FN424"></a><a href="#FN424A">[424]</a></sup> + <i>Nugæ Antiquæ</i>, i. 374.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN425" id="FN425"></a><a href="#FN425A">[425]</a></sup> + <i>Harleian Miscellany</i>, iv. 249.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN426" id="FN426"></a><a href="#FN426A">[426]</a></sup> + This terrible state of things was alleged as a principal reason for the prorogation + of the Parliament for two months and a half. As a matter of fact, the rebels had been + overthrown and captured the day before that on which the king's speech was delivered, + and news of that event was received that same evening.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN427" id="FN427"></a><a href="#FN427A">[427]</a></sup> + <i>Commons' Journals.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN428" id="FN428"></a><a href="#FN428A">[428]</a></sup> + In the preamble of the Act so passed we read: "Forasmuch as it is found by daily + experience, that many his Majesty's subjects that adhere in their hearts to the + popish religion, by the infection drawn from thence, and by the wicked and devilish + counsel of jesuits, seminaries, and other like persons dangerous to the church and + state, are so perverted in the point of their loyalties and due allegiance unto the + King's majesty, and the Crown of England, as they are ready to entertain and execute + any treasonable conspiracies and practices, as evidently appears by that more than + barbarous and horrible attempt to have blown up with gunpowder the King, Queen ..." + etc., etc.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN429" id="FN429"></a><a href="#FN429A">[429]</a></sup> + <i>Negotiations</i>, p. 256.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN430" id="FN430"></a><a href="#FN430A">[430]</a></sup> + "Our parliament is prorogued till the 18th of next November. Many things have been + considerable in it, but especially the zeal of both Houses for the preservation of + God's true religion, by establishing many good laws against Popery and those + firebrands, Jesuits, and Priests, that seek to bring all things into confusion. His + Majesty resolveth once more by proclamation to banish them all; and afterwards, if + they shall not obey, then the laws shall go upon them without any more + forbearance."—Cecil to Winwood, June 7th, 1606 (Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, ii. + 219).</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN431" id="FN431"></a><a href="#FN431A">[431]</a></sup> + In the <i>Dictionary of National Biography</i>, and Doyle's <i>Official Baronage</i>, + this installation is erroneously assigned to 1605.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN432" id="FN432"></a><a href="#FN432A">[432]</a></sup> + <i>Chronicle</i>, p. 408.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN433" id="FN433"></a><a href="#FN433A">[433]</a></sup> + Continuation of Stowe's <i>Annals</i>, p. 883.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN434" id="FN434"></a><a href="#FN434A">[434]</a></sup> + Letter iii.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN435" id="FN435"></a><a href="#FN435A">[435]</a></sup> + At Northumberland's trial Lord Salisbury thus expressed himself: "I have taken paines + in my nowne heart to clear my lord's offences, which now have leade me from the + contemplation of his virtues; for I knowe him vertuous, wyse, valiaunte, and of use + and ornamente to the state.... The cause of this combustion was the papistes seekinge + to restore their religion. Non libens dico, sed res ipsa loquitur."—Hawarde, + <i>Les Reportes</i>, etc.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN436" id="FN436"></a><a href="#FN436A">[436]</a></sup> + <i>History</i>, vii. 84, note. On this subject Mr. Sawyer, the editor of Winwood + (1715), has the following remark: "We meet with some account of his + [Northumberland's] offence, though couched in such tender terms, that 'tis a little + difficult to conceive it deserved so heavy a punishment as a fine of £30,000 + and perpetual imprisonment." (<i>Memorials</i>, iii. 287, note.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN437" id="FN437"></a><a href="#FN437A">[437]</a></sup> + To Winwood, <i>Memorials</i>, iii. 287.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN438" id="FN438"></a><a href="#FN438A">[438]</a></sup> + <i>Traditional Memoirs</i>, p. 214.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN439" id="FN439"></a><a href="#FN439A">[439]</a></sup> + <i>An Answere to certaine Scandalous Papers, scattered abroad under colour of a + Catholicke Admonition.</i> "Qui facit vivere, docet orare." Imprinted at London by + Robert Barker, Printer to the King's most Eccellent Majestie. Anno 1606.</p> + + <p>This was published in January, 1605-6, on the 28th of which month Sir W. Browne, + writing from Flushing, mentions that "my lord of Salisbury hath lately published a + little booke as a kynd of answer to som secrett threatning libelling letters cast + into his chamber." (Stowe MSS., 168, 74, f. 308.)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN440" id="FN440"></a><a href="#FN440A">[440]</a></sup> + On this subject Cornwallis wrote to Salisbury (Winwood, ii. 193): "Many reports are + here spread of the Combination against your Lordship, and that five English Romanists + would resolve your death. It seems that since they cannot be allowed <i>Sacrificium + incruentum</i>, they will now altogether put in use their sacrifices of blood. But I + hope and suppose that their hearts and their hands want much of the vigour that rests + in their wills and their pens. Your Lordship doth take especial courage in this, that + they single you out as the chief and principal watch Tower of your Country and + Commonwealth, and turn the strength of their malice to you whom they hold the + discoverer of all their unnatural and destructive inventions against their prince and + country," etc.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN441" id="FN441"></a><a href="#FN441A">[441]</a></sup> + P.R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> xviii. 97, February 27th, N.S., 1606. The original, which + is in Latin, has been utterly misunderstood by the Calendarer of State Papers.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN442" id="FN442"></a><a href="#FN442A">[442]</a></sup> + Stonyhurst MSS., <i>Anglia</i>, iii. 72.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN443" id="FN443"></a><a href="#FN443A">[443]</a></sup> + Thomas Howard, cr. 1603.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN444" id="FN444"></a><a href="#FN444A">[444]</a></sup> + To the ambassadors.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN445" id="FN445"></a><a href="#FN445A">[445]</a></sup> + Father Blount's account is undoubtedly in keeping with what we know of the Earl, and + especially of his Countess, who was a sister of Sir Thomas Knyvet, the captor of Guy + Faukes. Suffolk, in 1614, became Lord High Treasurer, but four years afterwards grave + irregularities were discovered in his office; he was accused of embezzlement and + extortion, in which work his wife was proved to have been even more active than + himself. They were sentenced to restore all money wrongfully extorted, to a fine of + £30,000, and to imprisonment during pleasure.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN446" id="FN446"></a><a href="#FN446A">[446]</a></sup> + In this letter all proper names are in cipher, as well as various other words.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN447" id="FN447"></a><a href="#FN447A">[447]</a></sup> + <i>Church History</i>, x. 40.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN448" id="FN448"></a><a href="#FN448A">[448]</a></sup> + We have four Latin epigrams of Milton's, <i>In proditionem Bombardicam</i>, which, + though pointless, are bitterly anti-Catholic. A longer poem, of 226 lines, <i>In + quintum Novembris</i>, is still more virulent.</p> + + <p>It is somewhat remarkable that the universal Shakespeare should make no allusion + to the Plot, beyond the doubtful reference to equivocation in <i>Macbeth</i> (ii. 3). + He was at the time of its occurrence in the full flow of his dramatic activity.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN449" id="FN449"></a><a href="#FN449A">[449]</a></sup> + See Appendix L, <i>Myths and Legends of the Powder Plot</i>.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN450" id="FN450"></a><a href="#FN450A">[450]</a></sup> + Brit. Mus. Print Room, Crace Collection, portf. xv. 28. This is reproduced, as our + frontispiece.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN451" id="FN451"></a><a href="#FN451A">[451]</a></sup> + There was a new moon at 11.30 p.m. on October 31st.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN452" id="FN452"></a><a href="#FN452A">[452]</a></sup> + The reasons assigned in the proclamation for this prorogation are plainly + insufficient: viz., "That the holding of it [the Parliament] so soone is not + convenient, as well for that the ordinary course of our subjects resorting to the + citie for their usuall affaires at the Terme is not for the most part till + Allhallowtide or thereabouts." Why, then, had the meeting been fixed for so + unsuitable a date?</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN453" id="FN453"></a><a href="#FN453A">[453]</a></sup> + November 7th, 1605. (<i>Dom. James I.</i>)</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN454" id="FN454"></a><a href="#FN454A">[454]</a></sup> + Tanner MSS. lxxv. 44.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN455" id="FN455"></a><a href="#FN455A">[455]</a></sup> + <i>Ibid.</i></p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN456" id="FN456"></a><a href="#FN456A">[456]</a></sup> + On his arrival in England, as Osborne tells us (<i>Memoirs</i>, p. 276), King James + "brought a new holiday into the Church of England, wherein God had publick thanks + given him for his majestie's deliverance out of the hands of Earle Goury;" but the + introduction was not a success, Englishmen and Scots alike ridiculing it. Gunpowder + Plot Day was more fortunate.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN457" id="FN457"></a><a href="#FN457A">[457]</a></sup> + <i>Harleian Miscellany</i>, iv. 251.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[Pg 235]</a></span></p> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_A" id="APPENDIX_A"></a>APPENDIX A.</h2> + + <h3>NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS.</h3> + + <h4 class="c16"><a href="#image1">Frontispiece.</a> The Powder Plot. I.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">From</span> the Crace Collection, British Museum, + <i>Portf.</i> xv. 20. Thus described in the catalogue of the collection:</p> + + <p>"A small etching of the House of Lords. Guy Fawkes in the foreground. W.E. exc. + 1605."</p> + + <p>This plate is of exceptional interest as having been executed within five months of + the discovery of the Plot, <i>i.e.</i>, previously to March 25th, 1606, the first day + of the year, Old Style.</p> + + <p>Guy Faukes is represented as approaching the House of Commons (St. Stephen's + Chapel), not the House of Lords, as the catalogue says.</p> + + <h4 class="c16"><a href="#image2">Title-Page.</a></h4> + + <p>Obverse, or reverse, of a medal struck, by order of the Dutch senate, to commemorate + the double event of the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot and the expulsion of the + Jesuits from Holland. Drawn from a copy of the medal in pewter, by Paul Woodroffe. The + design here exhibited is thus described in Hawkins and Frank's <i>Medallic + Illustrations</i>:</p> + + <p>"The name of Jehovah, in Hebrew, radiate, within a crown of thorns.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[Pg 236]</a></span></p> + + <p>"Legend, chronogrammatic,</p> + + <blockquote> + <p><span class="smcap">Non DorMItastI AntIstes IaCobI</span>"</p> + </blockquote> + + <p class="ni">[which gives the date 1605]</p> + + <p>On its other face the medal bears a snake gliding amid roses and lilies [symbolizing + Jesuit intrigues in England and France], with the legend <i>Detectus qui latuit. + S.C.</i> [Senatus Consulto]."</p> + + <p>This is reproduced on the cover.</p> + + <h4><i>Group of Conspirators</i> <a href="#image3">(p. 3).</a></h4> + + <p>From a print published at Amsterdam.</p> + + <p>Eight conspirators are represented, five being omitted, viz., Grant, Keyes, Digby, + Rokewood, and Tresham.</p> + + <p>Bates, as a servant, wears no hat.</p> + + <h4><i>The Houses of Parliament in the time of James I.</i> <a href="#image4">(pp. + 56-7).</a></h4> + + <p>Restored from the best authorities, and drawn for the author by H.W. Brewer.</p> + + <h4><i>Ground Plan of House of Lords and adjacent Buildings</i> <a href="#image6">(p. + 59).</a></h4> + + <p>Extracted from the "Foundation plan of the Ancient Palace of Westminster; measured, + drawn and engraved by J.T. Smith" (<i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>, p. 125)</p> + + <h4><i>The House of Lords in 1807</i> <a href="#image7">(p. 61).</a></h4> + + <p>From J.T. Smith's <i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>.</p> + + <p>This sketch, made from the east, or river, side, was taken during the demolition of + the buildings erected <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[Pg + 237]</a></span>against the sides of the Parliament House. These were put up previously + to the time when Hollar made his drawing of the interior (temp. Charles II.), which + shows the walls hung with tapestry, the windows having been blocked up.</p> + + <p>According to a writer in the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> (No. 70, July, 1800), who + signs himself "Architect," in a print of the time of James I. the tapestry is not seen, + and the House "appears to have preserved much of its original work." The only print + answering to this description which I have been able to find exhibits the windows, but + is of no value for historical purposes, as it is a reproduction of one of the time of + Queen Elizabeth, the figure of the sovereign alone being changed. This engraving is + said to be "taken from a painted print in the Cottonian Library," of which I can find + no trace. [B. Mus., K. 24. 19. b.]</p> + + <p>To the left of our illustration is seen the gable of the Prince's Chamber. The door + to the right of this opened into the cellar, and by it, according to tradition, Faukes + was to have made his exit.</p> + + <p>In front of this is seen part of the garden attached to Percy's lodging.</p> + + <h4><i>Interior of "Guy Faukes' Cellar"</i> <a href="#image8">(p. 71).</a></h4> + + <p>Two views of the interior of the "cellar," drawn by H.W. Brewer, from elevations in + J.T. Smith's <i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>, p. 39.</p> + + <p>The remains of a buttery-hatch, at the southern end, testify to the ancient use of + the chamber as the palace kitchen; of which the Earl of Northampton made mention at + Father Garnet's trial.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[Pg 238]</a></span></p> + + <p>The very ancient doorway in the eastern wall, seen on the left of the picture, was + of Saxon workmanship, and, like the foundations beneath, probably dated from the time + of Edward the Confessor, who first erected this portion of the palace, most of which + had been rebuilt about the time of Henry III. By this doorway, according to some + accounts, Faukes intended to escape after firing the train, though others assign this + distinction to one near the other end.</p> + + <p>These two illustrations were originally prepared for the <i>Daily Graphic</i> of + November 5th, 1894, and it is by the courtesy of the proprietors of that journal that + they are here reproduced.</p> + + <h4><i>Vault under the East End of the Painted Chamber</i> <a href="#image9">(p. + 73).</a></h4> + + <p>From Brayley and Britton's <i>Palace of Westminster</i>, p. 247.</p> + + <p>This has been constantly depicted and described as "Guy Faukes' Cellar."</p> + + <h4><i>Arches from Guy Faukes' Cellar</i> <a href="#image10">(p. 75).</a></h4> + + <p>Drawn for the author by H.W. Brewer.</p> + + <p>Sir John Soane, who in 1823 took down the old House of Lords, removed the arches + from the "cellar" beneath it, to his own house in Lincoln's Inn Fields, now the Soane + Museum, where they are still to be seen in a small court adjoining the building. They + do not, however, appear to have been set up precisely in their original form, being + dwarfed by the omission of some stones, presumably that they might occupy less space. + In our illustration they are represented exactly as they <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_239" id="Page_239">[Pg 239]</a></span>now stand, with the modern building behind + them. Some incongruous relics of other stonework which have been introduced amongst + them have, however, been omitted.</p> + + <p>The architecture of these arches, and of the adjacent Prince's Chamber, assigns them + to the best period of thirteenth century Gothic.</p> + + <h4><i>Cell at S.E. corner of Painted Chamber</i> <a href="#image11">(p. 83).</a></h4> + + <p>Often styled "Guy Faukes' Cell."</p> + + <p>From Brayley and Britton, <i>op. cit.</i>, p. 360.</p> + + <p>There appears to be no reason for associating this with Faukes.</p> + + <h4><i>The Powder Plot. II.</i> <a href="#image12">(p. 90).</a></h4> + + <p>"Invented by Samuel Ward, Preacher, of Ipswich. Imprinted at Amsterdam, 1621." + [British Museum, <i>Political and Personal Satires</i>, i. 41.]</p> + + <p>This is the portion to the right of a composition representing on the left the + Spanish Armada, and in the centre a council table at which are gathered the Devil, the + Pope, the King of Spain, the General of the Jesuits, and others. An eye above is fixed + on the cellar. Faukes in this case is going to blow up the Painted Chamber.</p> + + <h4><i>Interior of the old House of Lords (Scene on occasion of the King's Speech, + 1755)</i> <a href="#image13">(p. 97).</a></h4> + + <p>This plate represents the House in the reign of George II. In the century and a half + since the time of the Powder Plot it is probable that the windows <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[Pg 240]</a></span>in the side walls had + been blocked up, and the tapestry hung. The latter represented the defeat of the + Armada.</p> + + <p>[From Maitland's <i>London</i> (1756), ii. 1340.]</p> + + <h4><i>Lord Monteagle and the Letter</i> <a href="#image14">(p. 115).</a></h4> + + <p>From <i>Mischeefes Mystery</i>.</p> + + <p>King James enthroned, with crown and sceptre, upon a daïs, at the foot of which + stands the Earl of Salisbury. An eagle bears a letter in its beak, to receive which the + king and his minister extend their left hands.</p> + + <p>The English poem, by John Vicars, embellished with this woodcut, was published in + 1617, being a much expanded version of one in Latin hexameters, entitled <i>Pietas + Pontificia</i>, by Francis Herring, which appeared in 1606.</p> + + <h4><i>Arrest of Guy Faukes</i> <a href="#image15">(p. 125).</a></h4> + + <p>From <i>Mischeefes Mystery</i>.</p> + + <p>Guy Faukes booted and spurred, and with his lantern, prepares to open a door at the + extremity of the Painted Chamber. Sir Thomas Knyvet with his retinue approaches unseen. + The stars and the beams from the lantern show that it is the middle of the night.</p> + + <h4><i>Discovery of the Gunpowder Plot</i> <a href="#image16">(p. 136).</a></h4> + + <p>From a print in the Guildhall Library.</p> + + <p>Catesby, Faukes, and Garnet (the latter in what is apparently meant for the Jesuit + habit) stand in the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[Pg + 241]</a></span>middle of the street conspiring secretly. Through the open door of the + "cellar" the powder barrels are seen.</p> + + <p>This illustration (without the coins) stands at the head of Book XVIII. of M. Rapin + de Thoyras' <i>History of England</i>, translated by N. Tindal.</p> + + <h4>"<i>Guy Faukes' Lantern</i>" <a href="#image17">(p. 139).</a></h4> + + <p>Drawn by H.W. Brewer.</p> + + <p>This object, the authenticity of which is not unquestionable, is exhibited in the + Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. It bears the inscription, "Laterna illa ipsa qua usus est, et + cum qua deprehensus Guido Faux in crypta subterranea ubi domo Parliamenti + difflandæ operam dabat. Ex dono Robti Heywood nuper Academiae Procuratoris, Ap. + 4<sup>o</sup>, 1641."</p> + + <p>It will be remembered that the honour of having arrested Faukes has been claimed for + one of the name of Heywood.</p> + + <p>The history of the famous lantern has not escaped the variations which we are + accustomed to meet with on other points. Faukes is generally said to have been found + with it in his hands, and it has consequently become an inseparable adjunct in pictures + of him. On the other hand, we are told, "In a corner, behind the door, was a dark + lantern containing a light" (Brayley and Britton, <i>Palace of Westminster</i>, p. + 377).</p> + + <h4><i>Thomas Percy</i> <a href="#image18">(p. 149).</a></h4> + + <p>From Grainger.</p> + + <p>Around the portrait are four small engravings representing:</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[Pg 242]</a></span></p> + + <ol> + <li>The arrest of Guy Faukes, who is here called "Thomas Ichrup."</li> + + <li>The presentation of Thomas Ichrup to the King of Jerusalem (<i>i.e.</i>, the + British Solomon).</li> + + <li>The assault and bombardment of the "citadel" to which Percy has fled.</li> + + <li>Percy killed by an arrow.</li> + </ol> + + <h4><i>Thomas Winter's Confession</i> <a href="#image19">(p. 168).</a></h4> + + <p>A portion of the copy of Winter's confession, in the handwriting of Levinus Munck, + Lord Salisbury's private secretary, and dated November 23rd. In the margin is a note in + the handwriting of King James, objecting to a certain "uncleare phrase," which has been + altered in accordance with the royal wish. In the printed version it appears in the + amended form.</p> + + <h4><i>Signatures exemplifying the Effects of Torture</i> <a href="#image20">(p. + 173).</a></h4> + + <p>Three signatures of Faukes (November 9th, 1605), and three of Father Edward Oldcorne + (March 6th, 1605-6), at different stages of the same examination.</p> + + <h4><i>Guy Faukes' Confession of November 9th, 1605</i> <a href="#image21">(p. + 199).</a></h4> + + <p>A portion of this confession, in which Faukes speaks of the oath taken by the + conspirators and of their reception of the sacrament at the hands of Father John + Gerard, adding, however, that "Gerard was not acquainted with their purpose." The last + clause has been marked for omission by Sir Edward Coke who has written in the margin + <i>hucusq</i>. ("thus far").</p> + + <p>The letter B in the margin is also inserted by Coke, <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_243" id="Page_243">[Pg 243]</a></span>who habitually indicated by such letters + which portions of the depositions were to be read in court and which omitted, all being + always suppressed which told in any way in favour of the accused.</p> + + <p>The document is written by a clerk, and signed by Faukes at the foot of each + page.</p> + + <h4><i>The Powder Plot. III.</i> <a href="#image22">(p. 215).</a></h4> + + <p>This is taken from a large plate [British Museum, <i>Political and Personal + Satires</i>, i. 67], of which only the lower portion is here reproduced. At the top is + the inscription:</p> + + <p><span class="smcap">The Powder Treason</span>, Propounded by Sathan, Approved by + Anti-Christ, Enterprised by Papists, Practized by Traitors, Reveled by an Eagle, + Expounded by an Oracle.—Founded in Hell, Confounded in Heaven.</p> + + <p>Beneath are many emblematical devices.</p> + + <p>In the portion here exhibited, King James is seen on his throne with Lords and + Commons before him. Under the floor is a diminutive figure of Faukes with an ample + store of barrels. At the bottom, in the left hand corner, some of the conspirators + receive the sacrament from Father Gerard: on the right they are executed. On a lunette + are the thirteen conspirators, with the arch-traitor Garnet in the centre, the band + being described as "The Pope's Saltpeeter Saints." Within the lunette are the Jesuits + in Hell.</p> + + <h4><i>The Powder Plot. IV.</i> <a href="#image23">(p. 227).</a></h4> + + <p>This is the portion on the left of a composite picture [British Museum, <i>Political + and Personal <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[Pg + 244]</a></span>Satires</i>, 63], on the right being represented the catastrophe known + as the "Blackfriars Downfall." On Sunday, October 26th, 1623, many Catholics having + assembled in an upper room of the French ambassador's house, in Blackfriars, to hear a + sermon from the Jesuit, Father Drury, the floor collapsed, and many, including the + preacher, were killed. As October 26th, O.S., corresponded to November 5th, N.S., it + was ingeniously discovered that the accident was meant to signalize Gunpowder Plot day, + though this fell on November 5th, O.S., or November 15th, N.S.</p> + + <p>In our illustration the Parliament House is represented by a nondescript edifice, + the wall of which is partially removed, showing King James and some of the Peers. An + oven-like vault beneath represents the "cellar," well stored with barrels, which Faukes + is preparing to light with a torch fanned by a crowned fiend with a pair of bellows. A + company of halberdiers approaches under the guidance of an angel. In the background is + a royal funeral procession.</p> + + <p>A Latin inscription is attached which runs thus:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p><small>"Anno 1623, Quinto Novembris, eo scripto die quo Angliæ Parliamentum, + a<sup>o</sup> 1605, proditione et insidiis Jesuitarum, pulvere nitreo inflammari et + in æthera spargi debuit, Jesuitarum conventus Londini, ... ad missam et + conciones audiendas congregatus, fatali providentia, ædium ruina + præcipitatus et dissipatus est, oppressis centum et plus totidem + vulneratis.</small></p> + </blockquote> + + <blockquote> + <p><small>Loiolides sanctos efflare volebat ad astra;<br /> + Astra repercutiunt fulmine Loiolidem.<br /> + Loiolides, sine te penetrabit astra fidelis:<br /> + Tu fato ad Stygias præcipitaris aquas."</small></p> + </blockquote> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[Pg 245]</a></span></p> + + <h4><i>The Powder Plot. V.</i> <a href="#image24">(p. 229).</a></h4> + + <p>This is an edition of Samuel Ward's print described above, improved and embellished + by a "Transmariner" in 1689. [British Museum, <i>Political and Personal Satires</i>, i. + 43.]</p> + + <p>The tent in which the council table stands is ornamented at the four corners with + figures of a wolf, a parrot, an owl, and a dragon: a cockatrice is on the table; on the + top lie a gun, a sword, and a brace of pistols. A demon, bearing behind him a Papal + Bull, accompanies Faukes, beneath whose lantern, as a play on his name, is written + <i>Fax</i>. At the door of the cellar are scorpions and a serpent. On the top of the + barrels within are seen the "yron barres," placed there to make the breach the + greater.</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_B_p_33" id="APPENDIX_B_p_33"></a>APPENDIX B. <a href= + "#Page_33">(p. 33).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">Sir Everard Digby's letter to Salisbury.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">It</span> seems to have been always assumed that this + celebrated letter, which is undated, was written after the failure of the Gunpowder + Plot, and the consequent arrest of Sir Everard, and doubtless to some extent internal + evidence supports this view, as the writer speaks of himself as deserving punishment, + and of "our offence." It is, moreover, clear that the letter, which is undated, cannot + have been written before May 4th, 1605, the date of Cecil's earldom. On the other hand, + the whole tone of the document appears utterly inconsistent with the supposition that + it was <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[Pg + 246]</a></span>written by one branded with the stigma of such a crime as the Powder + Plot. Some of the expressions used, especially in the opening sentence, appear, + likewise, incompatible with such a supposition, and the letter bears the usual form of + address for those sent in ordinary course of post, "To the Right Hon. the Earl of + Salisburie give these"; it has moreover been sealed with a crest or coat-of-arms; all + of which is quite unlike a document prepared by a prisoner for those who had him under + lock and key. It is noteworthy, too, that at the trial, according to the testimony of + the official account itself, on the very subject of the treatment of Catholics, + Salisbury acknowledged "that Sir E. Digby was his ally."</p> + + <p>It seems probable, therefore, that the letter was written before Digby had been + entangled by Catesby in the conspiracy (<i>i.e.</i>, between May and September, 1605). + If so, what was the "offence" of which he speaks? The answer to this question would + throw an interesting light on this perplexed history. The following is Sir Everard's + letter:</p> + + <p>"Right Honourable, I have better reflected on your late speeches than at the present + I could do, both for the small stay which I made, and for my indisposition that day, + not being very well, and though perhaps your Lordship may judge me peremptory in + meddling, and idle in propounding, yet the desire I have to establish the King in + safety will not suffer me to be silent."</p> + + <p>"One part of your Lordship's speech (as I remember) was that the King could not get + so much from the Pope (even then when his Majesty had done nothing against Catholics) + as a promise that he would<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[Pg + 247]</a></span> not excommunicate him, so long as that mild course was continued, + wherefore it gave occasion to suspect, that if Catholics were suffered to increase, the + Pope might afterwards proceed to excommunication, if the King would not change his + religion. But to take away that doubt, I do assure myself that his Holiness may be + drawn to manifest so contrary a disposition of excommunicating the King, that he will + proceed with the same course against all such as shall go about to disturb the King's + quiet and happy reign; and the willingness of Catholics, especially of priests and + Jesuits, is such as I dare undertake to procure any priest in England (though it were + the Superior of the Jesuits) to go himself to Rome to negotiate this business, and that + both he and all other religious men (till the Pope's pleasure be known) shall take any + spiritual course to stop the effect that may proceed from any discontented or + despairing Catholic."</p> + + <p>"And I doubt not but his return would bring both assurance that such course should + not be taken with the King, and that it should be performed against any that should + seek to disturb him for religion. If this were done, there could then be no cause to + fear any Catholic, and this may be done only with those proceedings (which as I + understood your lordship) should be used. If your Lordship apprehend it to be worth the + doing, I shall be glad to be the instrument, for no hope to put off from myself any + punishment, but only that I wish safety to the King and ease to Catholics. If your + Lordship and the State think it fit to deal severely with Catholics, within brief there + will be massacres, rebellions, and desperate attempts against the King and State. For + it is a general received reason<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_248" id= + "Page_248">[Pg 248]</a></span> amongst Catholics, that there is not that expecting and + suffering course now to be run that was in the Queen's time, who was the last of her + line, and last in expectance to run violent courses against Catholics; for then it was + hoped that the King that now is would have been at least free from persecuting, as his + promise was before his coming into this realm, and as divers his promises have been + since his coming, saying that he would take no soul money nor blood. Also, as it + appeared, was the whole body of the Council's pleasure, when they sent for divers of + the better sort of Catholics (as Sir Thos. Tressam and others) and told them it was the + King's pleasure to forgive the payment of Catholics, so long as they should carry + themselves dutifully and well. All these promises every man sees broken, and to thrust + them further in despair, most Catholics take note of a vehement book written by Mr. + Attorney, whose drift (as I have heard) is to prove that the only being a Catholic is + to be a traitor, which book coming forth, after the breach of so many promises, and + before the ending of such a violent parliament, can work no less effect in men's minds + than a belief that every Catholic will be brought within that compass before the King + and State have done with them. And I know, as the priest himself told me, that if he + had not hindered there had somewhat been attempted, before our offence, to give ease to + Catholics. But being so safely prevented, and so necessary to avoid, I doubt not but + your Lordship and the rest of the Lords will think of a more mild and undoubted safe + course, in which I will undertake the performance of what I have promised and as much + as can be expected, and when I have done, I shall be as<span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_249" id="Page_249">[Pg 249]</a></span> willing to die as I am ready to offer my + service, and expect not nor desire favour for it, either before the doing it, nor in + the doing it, nor after it is done, but refer myself to the resolved course for me. So, + leaving to trouble your Lordship any further, I humbly take my leave. Your Lordship's + poor bedesman, <span class="smcap">Ev. Digby</span>."</p> + + <p><i>Addressed</i> "To the Right Honourable the Earl of Salisburie give these."</p> + + <p><i>Sealed.</i><br /> + [P.R.O. <i>Dom. James I.</i> xvii. 10.]</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_C_p_34" id="APPENDIX_C_p_34"></a>APPENDIX C. <a href= + "#Page_34">(p. 34).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">The Question of Succession.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">Father Parsons'</span> well-known book on this + subject, written under the pseudonym of Doleman, was denounced by Sir Edward Coke as + containing innumerable treasons and falsehoods. In fact, as may be seen in the work + itself, it is an exhaustive and careful statement of the descent of each of the + possible claimants, and of other considerations which must enter into the settlement. + Sir Francis Inglefield wrote that it was necessary to take some step of this kind, to + set men thinking on so important a question which would soon have to be decided, for + that the anti-Catholic party had made it treason to discuss it during the queen's life, + with intent to foist a successor of their <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_250" id= + "Page_250">[Pg 250]</a></span>own selection on the nation, when the moment should + arrive, trusting to the ignorance universally prevalent as to the rights of the matter; + but that such lack of information could not help the people to a sound decision. + [Stonyhurst MSS., <i>Anglia</i>, iii. 32.]</p> + + <p>The Spanish sympathies of Parsons and his party were afterwards made much of as + evidence of their traitorous disposition. On this subject it must be noted (1) the + Infanta of Spain was amongst those whose claim was urged on genealogical grounds; (2) + the project was to marry her to an English nobleman. As Parsons tells us, when she + married and was endowed with another estate, English Catholics ceased to think of her. + [<i>Ibid.</i> ii. 444.] (3) Father Garnet notes that, "since the old king of Spain died + [1598], there hath been no pretence ... for the Infanta, or the King [of Spain], or any + of that family, but for any that should maintain Catholic religion, and principally for + His Majesty" [James I.]. [<i>Ibid.</i> iii. n. 41.]</p> + + <p>A remark of Parsons' on this point, which at the time was considered almost + blasphemous, will seem now almost a truism, viz., that the title of particular + succession in kingdoms is founded only upon the positive laws of several countries, + since neither kingdoms nor monarchies are of the essence of human society, and + therefore every nation has a right to establish its own kings in what manner it likes, + and upon what conditions. Wherefore, as each of the other great parties in England + (whom he designates as Protestants and Puritans) will look chiefly to its own political + interests, and exact from the monarch of its choice pledges to secure them, it behoves + Catholics, being so large a part of the nation, to take their proper <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[Pg 251]</a></span>share in the settlement, + and therefore to study betimes the arguments on which the claims of the competitors are + severally based.</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_D_p_36" id="APPENDIX_D_p_36"></a>APPENDIX D. <a href= + "#Page_36">(p. 36).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">The Spanish Treason.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">The</span> history of the alleged treasonable + negotiations with Spain, conducted by various persons whose names were afterwards + connected with the Gunpowder Plot, appears open to the gravest doubt and suspicion. It + would be out of place to discuss the question here, but two articles on the subject, by + the present writer, will be found in the <i>Month</i> for May and June, 1896.</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_E_p_60" id="APPENDIX_E_p_60"></a>APPENDIX E. <a href= + "#Page_60">(p. 60).</a></h2> + + <h4><i>Site of Percy's lodging</i> [<i>see</i> View, <a href="#Page_56">p. 56</a>, and + Plan, <a href="#Page_59">p. 59.</a>]</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">That</span> the lodging hired by Percy stood near the + south-east corner of the old House of Lords (<i>i.e</i>. nearer to the river than that + building, and adjacent to, if not adjoining, the Prince's Chamber) is shown by the + following arguments.</p> + + <ol> + <li>John Shepherd, servant to Whynniard, gave evidence as to having on a certain + occasion seen from the river "a boat lye cloase to the pale of Sir Thomas Parreys + garden, and men going to and from the water <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_252" + id="Page_252">[Pg 252]</a></span>through the back door that leadeth into Mr. Percy + his lodging." [<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, 40, part 2.]</li> + + <li>Faukes, in his examination of November 5th, 1605, speaks of "the windowe in his + chamber neere the parliament house towards the water side."</li> + + <li>It is said that when digging their mine the conspirators were troubled by the + influx of water from the river, which would be impossible if they were working at the + opposite side of the Parliament House.</li> + </ol> + + <p>[It has always been understood that Percy's house stood at the south end of the + House of Lords, but Smith (<i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>, p. 39) places it to the + south-west instead of the south-east, saying that it stood on the site of what was + afterwards the Ordnance Office.]</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_F_p_64" id="APPENDIX_F_p_64"></a>APPENDIX F. <a href= + "#Page_64">(p. 64).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">Enrolment of Conspirators.</h4> + + <p>The evidence on this point is most contradictory.</p> + + <p>1. The Indictment, on the trial of the conspirators, mentions the following + dates.</p> + + <p><i>May 20th, 1604.</i> [Besides Garnet, Greenway, Gerard, "and other Jesuits,"] + there met together T. Winter, Faukes, Keyes, Bates, Catesby, Percy, the two Wrights, + and Tresham, by whom the Plot was approved and undertaken.</p> + + <p><i>March 31st, 1605</i>, R. Winter, Grant, and Rokewood were enlisted.</p> + + <p>[No mention is made of Digby, who was separately arraigned, nor in his arraignment + is any date specified.]</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[Pg 253]</a></span></p> + + <p>2. According to Faukes' confession of November 17th, 1605, Percy, Catesby, T. + Winter, J. Wright, and himself were the first associates. Soon afterwards C. Wright was + added. After Christmas, Keyes was initiated and received the oath. At a later period, + Digby, Rokewood, Tresham, Grant, and R. Winter were brought in. Bates is not + mentioned.</p> + + <p>[In this document the names of Keyes and R. Winter have been interchanged, in + Cecil's writing, and thus it was printed: the latter being made to appear as an earlier + confederate.]</p> + + <p>3. According to T. Winter's declaration of November 23rd, 1605, Catesby, J. Wright, + and himself were the first associates, Percy and Faukes being presently added. Keyes + was enlisted before Michaelmas, C. Wright after Christmas, Digby at a later period, and + Tresham "last of all." No others are mentioned.</p> + + <p>4. Keyes—November 30th, 1605—says that he was inducted a little before + Midsummer, 1604.</p> + + <p>5. R. Winter and Grant (January 17th, 1605-6) fix January, 1604-5, for their + introduction to the conspiracy, and Bates (December 4th, 1605) gives the preceding + December for his. Neither date agrees with that of the indictment in support of which + these confessions were cited.</p> + + <p>6. There is, of course, no evidence of any kind to show that Father Garnet and the + "other Jesuits" ever had any conference with the conspirators, nor was such a charge + urged on his trial.</p> + + <p>7. Sir Everard Digby's case is exceptionally puzzling. All the evidence represents + him as having been initiated late in September, or early in October, 1605. Among the + Hatfield MSS., however, there is a letter addressed <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_254" id="Page_254">[Pg 254]</a></span>to Sir Everard, by one G.D., and dated June + 11th, 1605, which treats ostensibly of a hunt for "the otter that infesteth your + brooks," to be undertaken when the hay has been cut, but has been endorsed by Cecil + himself, "Letter written to Sir Everard Digby—<i>Powder Treason</i>;" the + minister thus attributing to him a knowledge of the Plot, more than three months before + it was ever alleged that he heard of it.</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_G_p_94" id="APPENDIX_G_p_94"></a>APPENDIX G. <a href= + "#Page_94">(p. 94).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">Henry Wright the Informer.</h4> + + <p>1. <i>Letter to Sir T. Challoner, April, 1604.</i> [<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, n. + 236.]</p> + + <p>Good Sir Thomas, I am as eager for setting of the lodgings as you can be, and in + truth whereas we desired but twenty, the discoverer had set and (if we accept it) can + set above three score, but I told him that the State would take it for good service if + he set twenty of the most principal Jesuits and seminary priests, and therewithal I + gave him thirteen or fourteen names picked out of his own notes, among the which five + of them were sworn to the secresy. He saith absolutely that by God's grace he will do + it ere long, but he stayeth some few days purposely for the coming to town of Tesmond + [Greenway] and Kempe, two principals; their lodgings are prepared, and they will be + here, as he saith for certain, within these two days. For the treason, Davies neither + hath nor will unfold <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[Pg + 255]</a></span>himself for the discovery of it till he hath his pardon for it under + seal, as I told you, which is now in great forwardness, and ready to be sealed so that + you shall know all.... Your worship's most devoted,</p> + + <p class="right"><span class="smcap">Hen. Wright</span>.<br /></p> + + <p>[A pardon to Joseph Davies for all treasons and other offences appears on the Pardon + Roll, April 25th, 1605, thus supplying the approximate date of the above letter.]</p> + + <p>2. <i>Application to the King.</i> [<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, n. 237.]</p> + + <p>"If it may please your Majesty, can you remember that the Lord Chief Justice Popham + and Sir Thomas Challoner, Kt., had a hand in the discovery of the practices of the + Jesuits in the powder, and did from time reveal the same to your Majesty, for two + years' space almost before the said treason burst forth by an obscure letter to the + Lord Mounteagle, which your Majesty, like an angel of God, interpreted, touching the + blow, then intended to have been given by powder. The man that informed Sir Thomas + Challoner and the Lord Popham of the said Jesuitical practices, their meetings and + traitorous designs in that matter, whereof from time to time they informed your + Majesty, was one Wright, who hath your Majesty's hand for his so doing, and never + received any reward for his pains and charges laid out concerning the same. This + Wright, if occasion serve, can do more service."</p> + + <p>[<i>Addressed</i>, "Mr. Secretary Conway."</p> + + <p><i>Headed</i>, "Touching Wright and his services performed in the damnable plot of + the Powder treason."]</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[Pg 256]</a></span></p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_H_p_119" id="APPENDIX_H_p_119"></a>APPENDIX H. <a href= + "#Page_119">(p. 119).</a></h2> + + <h4><i>Lord Monteagle to King James</i>, (British Museum MSS. Add. 19402, f. 146.)</h4> + + <p class="ni">"<span class="smcap">Most</span> gracious Soveraine.—Your maiestyes + tender and fatherly love over me, In admonishinge me heartofore, to seake resolution In + matter of religion, geves me both occasion, and Incouragement, as humbly to thanke your + maiestye for this care of my soules good, so to crave leave of gevinge into your + maiestyes hand this accompt, that your wisdome, seinge the course and end of my + proceadinges, might rest assured that by the healp of god, I will [live and] dye, In + that religion which I have nowe resolved to profes.</p> + + <p>"It may please your maiestye therfore to knowe, that as I was breed upp In the + Romish religion and walked in that, because I knew no better, so have I not sodainely + or lightly made the chaunge, which nowe I desire to be seane In, for I speake, Sir, as + before him that shall Judg my soule, I have by praier, for god his gidance, and with + voues to him, to walk in that light he should shew me, and by longe carefull and + diligent readinge, and conference with lerned men, on both sides, and impartiall + examination of ther profes and argumentes, come to discerne the Ignorance I was + formerly wrapped In, as I nowe wonder that ether my self, or any other of common + understandinge, showld bee so blynded, as to Imbrace that gods trewth, [<i>sic</i>] + which I nowe perseyue to be grounded uppon so weake foundations. And as I never could + digest all poyntes therin, wherof not few seamed to bee made for gaine <span class= + 'pagenum'><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[Pg 257]</a></span>and ambition, of the + papacye, so nowe I fynde that the hole frame and bodye of that religion (wherin they + oppose us) difereth from the platforme, which god him self hath recorded In the holy + scriptures, and hath In length of tyme, by the Ignorance and deceiptfulness of men, + bene peaced together, and is now maintayned by factious obstinacye, and certain + coulerable pretences, such as the wittes and learninge of men, are able to cast uppon + any humaine errors, which they list to uphowld. Nether have I left any thinge I doubted + of untried or unresolued, becawse I did Intend and desire to so take up the trewth of + god, once discouered to me, as neuer to suffer yt to bee questioned any more In my owne + consienc. And In all this, Sir, I protest to your maiestye, before almightye god, I + have simply and only propounded to my self the trew seruise of god, and saluation of my + owne soule, Not gaine, not honor, no not that which I doe most highly valew, your + maiestyes fauour, or better opinion of me. Nether on the other side am I affraide of + those censures of men whether of the partye I have abandoned, or of others which I + shall Incur by this alteration, howldinge yt contentment Innough to my self, That god + hath in mercye enlightened my mynde to see his sacred trewth, with desire to serue [the + paper here is mutilated].... And rest, your maie[styes] most loyall and obedient + servant W. Mownteagle."</p> + + <p><i>Addressed</i>, "To the Kinge his most excellent Maiestye."</p> + + <p>From the absence of any allusion to the Powder Plot and its "discovery," it appears + certain that this letter must have been written previously to it.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[Pg 258]</a></span></p> + + <p>On August 1st, 1609, Sir Wm. Waad wrote to Salisbury that the disorders of Lord + Monteagle's house were an offence to the country. At this period he appears to have + been suspected of concealing Catholic students from St. Omers. [<i>Calendar of State + Papers.</i>]</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_I_p_140" id="APPENDIX_I_p_140"></a>APPENDIX I. <a href= + "#Page_140">(p. 140).</a></h2> + + <h4><i>Epitaph in St. Anne's, Aldersgate.</i> [Maitland, London (1756), p. 1065.]</h4> + + <p>"<i>Peter Heiwood</i>, younger son of <i>Peter Heiwood</i>, one of the Counsellors + of <i>Jamaica</i>, ... Great Grandson to <i>Peter Heiwood</i> of <i>Heywood</i> in the + County Palestine of <i>Lancaster</i>; who apprehended <i>Guy Faux</i> with his dark + Lanthorn; and for his zealous prosecution of Papists, as Justice of Peace, was stabbed + in <i>Westminster-Hall</i> by <i>John James</i>, a <i>Dominican</i> Friar, An. Dom. + 1640. Obiit <i>Novem. 2. 1701</i>.</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni">Reader, if not a Papist bred<br /> + Upon such Ashes gently tread."</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>It is to be presumed that the person who died in 1701 is not the same who was + stabbed in 1640, or who discovered Guy Faukes in 1605.</p> + + <p>The Dominican records contain no trace of any member of the Order named John James, + nor does so remarkable an event as the stabbing of a Justice of Peace in Westminster + Hall appear to be chronicled elsewhere.</p> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[Pg 259]</a></span></p> + + <p>Peter Heywood, J.P. for Westminster, was active as a magistrate as late as December + 15th, 1641. [<i>Calendar of State Papers.</i>]</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_K_p_173" id="APPENDIX_K_p_173"></a>APPENDIX K. <a href= + "#Page_173">(p. 173).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">The Use of Torture.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">There</span> can be no doubt that torture was freely + employed to extract evidence from the conspirators and others who fell into the hands + of the government.</p> + + <p>The Earl of Salisbury, in his letter to Favat, of December 4th, 1605, clearly + intimates that this was the case, when he complains "most of the prisoners have + wilfully forsworn that the priests knew anything in particular, and obstinately refuse + to be accusers of them, <i>yea, what torture soever they be put to</i>."</p> + + <p>About the middle of November, Lord Dunfermline wrote to Salisbury [<i>Dom. James + I.</i> xvi. 81] recommending that the prisoners should be confined apart and in + darkness, that they should be examined by torchlight, and that the tortures should be + slow and at intervals, as being thus most effectual.</p> + + <p>There is every reason to believe that the Jesuit lay-brother, Nicholas Owen, + <i>alias</i> Littlejohn, actually died upon the rack. [<i>Vide</i> Father Gerard's + <i>Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot</i>, p. 189.]</p> + + <p>Finally we have the king's instructions as to Faukes [<i>Gunpowder Plot Book</i>, + No. 17]. "The gentler tortours are to be first usid unto him, <i>et sic per gradus + ad</i> <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[Pg 260]</a></span><i>ima + tenditur</i>,<sup><a name="FN458A" id="FN458A"></a><a href="#FN458">[458]</a></sup> and + so God speede your goode worke."<sup><a name="FN459A" id="FN459A"></a><a href= + "#FN459">[459]</a></sup> Guy's signature of November 9th is sufficient evidence that it + was none of the "gentler tortours" which he had endured.</p> + + <p>In the violently Protestant account of the execution of the traitors,<sup><a name= + "FN460A" id="FN460A"></a><a href="#FN460">[460]</a></sup> we read: "Last of all came + the great Devil of all Faukes, who should have put fire to the powder. His body being + weak with torture and sickness, he was scarce able to go up the ladder, but with much + ado, by the help of the hangman, went high enough to brake his neck with the fall."</p> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_L_p_227" id="APPENDIX_L_p_227"></a>APPENDIX L. <a href= + "#Page_227">(p. 227).</a></h2> + + <h4 class="c16">Myths and Legends of the Powder Plot.</h4> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[Pg 261]</a></span></p> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">Around</span> the Gunpowder Plot has gathered a mass + of fabulous embellishment too curious to be passed over in silence. This has chiefly + attached itself to Guy Faukes, who, on account of the desperate part allotted to him + has impressed the public mind far more than any of his associates, and has come to be + erroneously regarded as the moving spirit of the enterprise.</p> + + <p>One of the best authenticated facts regarding him is that when apprehended he was + booted and spurred for a journey, though it is usually said that he was to have + travelled by water.</p> + + <p>There is, however, a strange story, told with much circumstantiality, which gives an + elaborate but incomprehensible account of a tragic underplot in connection with him. + This is related at considerable length in a Latin hexameter poem, <i>Venatio + Catholica</i>, published in 1609, in the <i>History of the Popish Sham Plots</i>, and + elsewhere. According to this tangled tale the other conspirators wished both to get rid + of Faukes, when he had served their purpose, and to throw the suspicion of their deed + upon their enemies, the Puritans. To this end they devised a notable scheme. A certain + Puritan, named Pickering, a courtier, but a godly man, foremost amongst his party, had + a fine horse ("Bucephalum egregium"). This, Robert Keyes, his brother-in-law, purchased + or hired, and placed at the service of Faukes for his escape. The steed was to await + him at a certain spot, but in a wood hard by assassins were to lurk, who, when Guy + appeared, should murder him, and having secured the money with which he was furnished, + should leave his mangled corpse beside the Bucephalus, known as Mr. Pickering's. Thus + Faukes would be able to tell no tales, and—though it does not appear + why—suspicion would be sure to fall on the <span class='pagenum'><a name= + "Page_262" id="Page_262">[Pg 262]</a></span>Puritan, and he would be proclaimed as the + author of the recent catastrophe.</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="ni"><small>"Hoc astu se posse rati convertere in hostes<br /> + Flagitii infamiam, causamque capessere vulgo<br /> + Qua Puritanos invisos reddere possent,<br /> + Ut tantæ authores, tam immanis proditionis.<br /> + Cognito equo, et facta (pro more) indagine cædis,<br /> + Aulicus hic sceleris tanquam fabricator atrocis<br /> + Proclamandus erat, Falso (ne vera referre<br /> + Et socios sceleris funesti prodere possit)<br /> + Sublato."</small></p> + </blockquote> + + <p>Many curious circumstances have likewise been imported into the history, and many + places connected with it which appear to have no claim whatever to such a + distinction.</p> + + <p>Thus we hear (<i>England's Warning Peece</i>) that the Jesuit Cresswell came over + from Spain for the occasion "to bear his part with the rest of his society in a + victorial song of thanksgiving." Also that on November 5th, a large body of + confederates assembled at Hampstead to see the House of Parliament go up in the + air.</p> + + <p>In the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i>, February, 1783, is a remarkable description of a + summer house, in a garden at Newton Hall, near Kettering, Northamptonshire, in which + the plotters used to meet and conspire, the place then belonging to the Treshams; "and + for greater security, they placed a conspirator at each window, Guy Faukes, the arch + villain, standing in the doorway, to prevent anybody overhearing them."</p> + + <p>According to a wide-spread belief Guy Faukes was a Spaniard.<sup><a name="FN461A" + id="FN461A"></a><a href="#FN461">[461]</a></sup> He has also been called a Londoner, + and <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[Pg 263]</a></span>his name + being altered to Vaux, has been said to have a family connection with Vauxhall. He was + in fact a Yorkshireman of good family, though belonging to a younger branch of no great + estate. His father, Edward Faukes, was a notary at York, where he held the office of + registrar and advocate of the cathedral church. Guy himself was an educated man, more + than commonly well read. He is always described in the process as "Guido Faukes, + Gentleman."</p> + + <p>Another most extraordinary example of an obvious myth, which was nevertheless + treated as sober history, is furnished by the absurd statement that the astute and wily + Jesuits not only contrived the Plot, but published its details to the world long before + its attempted execution, in order to vindicate to themselves the credit of so glorious + a design. Thus Bishop Kennet, in a fifth of November sermon, preached at St. Paul's + before the Lord Mayor, in 1715, tells us:<sup><a name="FN462A" id="FN462A"></a><a href= + "#FN462">[462]</a></sup></p> + + <p>"It was a general surmise at least among the whole Order of Jesuits in foreign + parts: or else one of them could hardly have stated the case so exactly some four or + five years before it broke out. Father Del-Rio, in a treatise printed An. 1600, put the + case, as if he had already looked into the Mine and Cellars, and had surveyed the + barrels of powder in them, and had heard the whole confessions of Faux and + Catesby."</p> + + <p>This "general surmise" does not appear to have been confined to the Jesuits + themselves. Another ingenious writer, nearly a century earlier,<sup><a name="FN463A" + id="FN463A"></a><a href="#FN463">[463]</a></sup> tells a wonderful story concerning the + sermon of a Dominican, <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[Pg + 264]</a></span>preached in the same year, 1600, wherein it was related how there was a + special hell, beneath the other, for Jesuits, so thick and fast did they arrive as to + need extra accommodation. The preacher avowed that he had, in his vision of the place, + given warning to the demon in charge of it, "to search them with speed, for fear that + they had conveyed hither some gunpowder with them, for they are very skilfull in + Mine-workes, and in blowing up of whole States and Parliament-houses, and if they can + blow you all up, then the Spanyards will come and take your kingdom from you."</p> + + <p>Another notable specimen of the way in which reason and probability were cast to the + winds is afforded by two letters written from Naples in 1610, one to King James and the + other to Salisbury, by Sir Edwin Rich,<sup><a name="FN464A" id="FN464A"></a><a href= + "#FN464">[464]</a></sup> who announced that Father Greenway—who of all the + Jesuits was said to be most clearly convicted as a traitor—intended to send to + the king a present of an embroidered satin doublet and hose, which, being craftily + poisoned, would be death to him if he put them on.</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN458" id="FN458"></a><a href="#FN458A">[458]</a></sup> + "And so by degrees to the uttermost."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN459" id="FN459"></a><a href="#FN459A">[459]</a></sup> + These instructions furnish an interesting specimen of the king's broad Scotch, + <i>e.g.</i>, "Quhat Gentlewomans Letter it was y<sup>t</sup> was founde upon him, and + quhairfor doth she give him an other Name in it y<sup>n</sup> he giues to himself. If + he was ever a papiste; and if so, quho brocht him up in it. If otherwayes, hou was he + convertid, quhair, quhan, and by quhom."</p> + + <p>The following passage is very characteristic of the writer:</p> + + <p>"Nou last, ye remember of the crewellie villanouse pasquille y<sup>t</sup> rayled + upon me for y<sup>e</sup> name of Brittanie. If I remember richt it spake something + of harvest and prophecyed my destructi[<span class="c11">o</span> about y<sup>t</sup> + tyme. Ye may think of y<sup>s</sup>, for it is lyke to be by y<sup>e</sup> Laboure of + such a desperate fellow as y<sup>s</sup> is."</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN460" id="FN460"></a><a href="#FN460A">[460]</a></sup> + <i>The Arraignment and execution of the late traitors</i>, etc., 1606.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN461" id="FN461"></a><a href="#FN461A">[461]</a></sup> + See, for instance, <i>London and the Kingdom</i> (mainly from the Guildhall + Archives), by Reginald R. Sharpe, ii. 13.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN462" id="FN462"></a><a href="#FN462A">[462]</a></sup> + P. 9.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN463" id="FN463"></a><a href="#FN463A">[463]</a></sup> + Lewis Owen, <i>Unmasking of all popish Monks</i>, etc. (1628), p. 49.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN464" id="FN464"></a><a href="#FN464A">[464]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> lvii. 92-93, October 5th.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_M" id="APPENDIX_M"></a>APPENDIX M.</h2> + + <h4 class="c16">Sir William Waad's Memorial Inscriptions.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">In</span> a room of the Queen's House in the Tower, + in which the conspirators are supposed to have been examined by the Lords of the + Council, Sir William <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[Pg + 265]</a></span>Waad has left a series of inscriptions as memorials of the events in + which he played so large a part. Of these the most noteworthy are the following:</p> + + <p class="center">I.</p> + + <p class="center"><small>Jacobus Magnus, Magnæ Britanniæ<br /> + rex, pietate, justitia, prudentia, doctrina, fortitudine,<br /> + clementia, ceterisq. virtutibus regiis clariss'; Christianæ<br /> + fidei, salutis publicæ, pacis universalis propugnator, fautor<br /> + auctor acerrimus, augustiss', auspicatiss'.<br /> + Anna Regina Frederici 2. Danorum Regis invictiss' filia sereniss<sup>a</sup>,<br /> + Henricus princeps, naturæ ornamentis, doctrinæ præsidiis, + gratiæ<br /> + Muneribus, instructiss', nobis et natus et a deo datus,<br /> + Carolus dux Eboracensis divina ad omnem virtutem indole,<sup><a name="FN465A" id= + "FN465A"></a><a href="#FN465">[465]</a></sup><br /> + Elizabetha utriusq. soror Germana, utroque parente dignissima<br /> + Hos velut pupillam oculi tenellam<br /> + providus muni, procul impiorum<br /> + impetu alarum tuarum intrepidos<br /> + conde sub umbra.</small></p> + + <p>[This is evidently intended for a Sapphic stanza, but the last two words of v. 3 + have been transposed, destroying the metre.]</p> + + <p class="center">II.</p> + + <p class="center"><small>Robertus Cecil, Comes Sarisburiensis, summus et regis<br /> + Secretarius, et Angliæ thesaurarius, clariss' patris<br /> + et de repub. meritissimi filius, in paterna munera<br /> + successor longe dignissimus;<br /> + Henricus, comes Northamptoniæ, quinq. portuum præfectus et<br /> + privati sigilli custos, disertorum litteratissimus, litteratorum<br /> + disertissimus;<br /> + Carolus comes Nottingamiæ, magnus Angliæ admirallus<br /> + victoriosus;<br /> + Thomas Suffolciæ comes, regis camerarius splendidissimus,<br /> + tres viri nobilissimi ex antiqua Howardorum familia, ducumq.<br /> + <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[Pg + 266]</a></span>Norfolciæ prosapia;<br /> + Edwardus Somersetus, comes Wigorniæ, equis regiis præfectus<br /> + ornatissimus;<br /> + Carolus Blunt, comes Devoniæ, Hyberniæ prorex et pacificator,<br /> + Joannes Areskinus,<sup><a name="FN466A" id="FN466A"></a><a href= + "#FN466">[466]</a></sup> illustris Marriæ comes, præcipuarum in + Scotia<br /> + arcium præfectus;<br /> + Georgius Humius, Dunbari comes, Scotiæ thesaurarius<br /> + prudentiss'<br /> + omnes illustriss' ordinis garteri milites;<br /> + Joannes Popham, miles, justiciarius Angliæ capitalis,<br /> + et justitiæ consultissimus:<br /></small></p> + + <p class="ni"><small>Hi omnes illustrissimi viri, quorum nomina ad sempiternam eorum + memoriam posteritati consecrandam proxime supra ad lineam posita sunt, ut regi a + consiliis, ita ab eo delegati quæsitores, reis singulis incredibili diligentia ac + cura sæpius appellatis, nec minore solertia et dexteritate pertentatis eorum + animis, eos suis ipsorum inter se collatis responsionibus convictos, ad voluntariam + confessionem adegerunt: et latentem nefarie conjurationis seriem, remq. omnem ut + hactenus gesta et porro per eos gerenda esset, summa fide erutam, æterna cum + laude sua, in lucem produxerunt, adeo ut divina singulari providentia effectum sit, ut + tam præsens, tamq. fœda tempestas, a regia majestate, liberisq. regiis, et + omni regno depulsa, in ipsos autores eorumq. socios redundarit.</small></p> + + <p class="center">III.</p> + + <p><small>Conjuratorum Nomina, ad perpetuam ipsorum infamiam et tantæ diritatis + detestationem sempiternam.</small></p> + + <table> + <tr> + <td align="center"><small><i>Monachi<br /> + salutare<br /> + Jesu<br /> + nom<span class="c11">e</span><br /> + ementiti</i></small></td> + + <td>{<br /> + {<br /> + {<br /> + {<br /> + {</td> + + <td align="center"><small>Henry Garnet<br /> + John Gerrard<br /> + Oswald Tesond<br /> + Ham<span class="c11">o</span><br /> + Baldw<span class="c11">i</span></small></td> + + <td><small>Thomas Winter<br /> + Robert Winter<br /> + John Winter<br /> + Guy Fawkes<br /> + Thomas Bates<br /> + Everard Digby, K.<br /> + Am' Rookewood<br /> + John Gaunt<br /> + Robert Keyes<br /> + Henry Morg<span class="c11">a</span></small></td> + + <td><small>Thomas Percy<br /> + Robert Catesby<br /> + John Wright<br /> + Christopher Wright<br /> + Francis Tresham<br /> + Thomas Abbington<br /> + Edmond Baineham, K.<br /> + William Stanley, K.<br /> + Hughe Owen.</small></td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[Pg 267]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">IV.</p> + + <p>Besides the above there is a prolix description of the Plot, devised against the + best of sovereigns, "a Jesuitis Romanensibus, perfidiæ Catholicæ et + impietatis viperinæ autoribus et assertoribus, aliisq. ejusdem amentiæ + scelerisq. patratoribus et sociis susceptæ, et in ipso pestis derepente + inferendæ articulo (salutis anno 1605, mensis Novembris die quinto), tam + præter spem quam supra fidem mirifice et divinitus detectæ."</p> + + <p>There is, moreover, a sentence in Hebrew, with Waad's cipher beneath, and a number + of what seem to be meant for verses. The following lines are evidently the Lieutenant's + description of his own office:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p><small>"Custodis Custos sum, Carcer Carceris, arcis<br /> + <span class="c10">Arx, atque Argu' Argus; sum speculæ specula;</span><br /> + Sum vinclum in vinclis; compes cum compede, clav<span class="c11">u</span><br /> + <span class="c10">Firmo hærens, teneo tentus, habens habeor.</span><br /> + Dum regi regnoq. salus stet firma quieta,<br /> + <span class="c10">Splendida sim Compes Compedis usque licet."</span></small></p> + </blockquote> + + <p>This is considerably more metrical and intelligible than some of the rest.</p> + + <p>In 1613 Waad was dismissed from his post, one of the charges against him being that + he had embezzled the jewels of Arabella Stuart.<sup><a name="FN467A" id= + "FN467A"></a><a href="#FN467">[467]</a></sup></p> + + <p>In Theobald's <i>Memoirs of Sir Walter Raleigh</i> (p. 16), Waad is described as + "the Lieutenant of the Tower, and Cecil's great Creature."</p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN465" id="FN465"></a><a href="#FN465A">[465]</a></sup> + At the time of the Plot Charles was not quite five years old.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN466" id="FN466"></a><a href="#FN466A">[466]</a></sup> + Erskine.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN467" id="FN467"></a><a href="#FN467A">[467]</a></sup> + <i>Dom. James I.</i> lxxii. 129.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <h2><a name="APPENDIX_N" id="APPENDIX_N"></a>APPENDIX N.</h2> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="rpad"> + <p><span class='pagenuml'><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[Pg + 268]</a></span></p> + + <h4><span class="smcap">The Published Confession of Guy Faukes. A.</span></h4> + + <h4><i>The draft, November 8th, 1605</i> (G.P.B. 49).</h4> + + <p class="center"><sup>*</sup><sub>*</sub><sup>*</sup> Passages between square + brackets have been cancelled.<br /> + Those marked * have been ticked off for omission.</p> + + <h4 class="c16">The Confession of Guy Fawkes, taken the 8 of November, 1605.</h4> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">He</span> confesseth that a Practise in + generall was first broken unto him, agaynst his Majesty, for the Catholique + cause, and not invented or propounded by himself, and this was first propounded + unto him about Easter last was twelvemonth, beyond the seas in the Low + countreyes, by an English Lay-man, and that English man came over with him in his + company into England, and they tow and three more weare the first five mencioned + in the former examination. And they five resolving to do some thinge for the + Catholick cause,—a vowe being first taken by all of them for + secrecye,—one of the other three propounded to perform it with Powder, and + resolved that the place should be,—where this action should be performed + and justice done,—in or neere the place of the sitting of the Parliament, + wherein Religion had been uniustly suppressed. This beeinge resolved the manner + [of it] was as followeth.</p> + </td> + + <td class="lpad"> + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[Pg 269]</a></span></p> + + <h4><span class="smcap">The Published Confession of Guy Faukes. B.</span></h4> + + <h4><i>As signed by Faukes, November 17th, 1605</i> (G.P.B. 101).</h4> + + <p><sup>*</sup><sub>*</sub><sup>*</sup> Square brackets indicate an erasure. + Italics an addition or substitution.</p> + + <p class="ni"><span class="smcap">The</span> [deposition] <i>declaration</i> of + Guy Fawkes prisonner in the Tower of London <i>taken the 17 of Nov. 1605, + acknowledged before the Lords Commissioners.</i><sup><a name="FN468A" id= + "FN468A"></a><a href="#FN468">[468]</a></sup></p> + + <p><i>A.</i> I confesse that a practise in generall was first broken unto me + against his Majestie, for releife of the Catholique cause, and not invented or + propounded by my self.</p> + + <p>And this was first propounded unto me about Easter last was twelvemonth, + beyond the Seas, in the Low countries of the Archdukes obeysance by Thomas + Wynter, who came thereupon with me into England, and there wee imparted our + purpose to three other Englishmen more, namely Rob<sup>t</sup> Catesby, + Tho<sup>s</sup> Percy, and John Wright, who all five consulting together of the + meanes how to execute the same, and taking a vowe among our selves for secresie + Catesby propounded to have it performed by Gunpowder, and by making a myne under + the upper house of Parliament, which place wee made choice of the rather,</p> + </td> + </tr> + + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="rpad"> + <p><span class='pagenuml'><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[Pg + 270]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>A. The draft.</i>]</p> + + <p>First they hyred the Howse at Westminster of one Ferris,<sup><a name="FN469A" + id="FN469A"></a><a href="#FN469">[469]</a></sup> and havinge the howse they + sought to make a myne under the upper howse of Parliament, and they begann to + make the myne in or about the xi of December, and they five first entered into + the worke, and soone after toke an other unto them, havinge first sworne him and + taken the Sacrament, for secrecye. And when they came to the wall,—that was + about three yards thicke,—and found it a matter of great difficultie, they + tooke to them an other in like manner, with oath and Sacrament as afore sayd. All + which seaven, were gentlemen of name and bloode, and not any man was employed in + or about that action,—noe not so much as in digginge and myning that was + not a gentleman. And having wrought to the wall before Christmas, they reasted + untill after the holydayes, and the day before Christmas,—having a masse of + earth that came out of the myne,—they carryed it into the Garden of the + said Howse, and after Christmas they wrought on the wall till Candlemas, and + wrought the wall half through, and sayeth that all the tyme while the others + wrought he stood as Sentynell to descrie any man that came neere, and when any + man came neere to the place, uppon warninge given by him they rested untill they + had notyce to proceed from hym, and sayeth that they seaven all lay in the Howse, + and had shott and powder, and they all resolved to dye in that place before they + yeilded or weare taken.</p> + </td> + + <td class="lpad"> + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[Pg 271]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>B. The Confession as signed.</i>]</p> + + <p class="ni">because Religion having been unjustly suppressed there, it was + fittest that Justice and punishment should be executed there.</p> + + <p><i>B.</i> This being resolved amongst us, Thomas Percy hired a howse at + Westminster for that purpose, neare adjoyning the Parl<sup>t</sup> howse, and + there wee beganne to make a myne about the xi of December 1604. The fyve that + entered into the woorck were Thomas Percye, Robert Catesby, Thomas Wynter, John + Wright, and my self, and soon after we tooke another unto us, Christopher Wright, + having sworn him also, and taken the Sacrament for secrecie.</p> + + <p><i>C.</i> When wee came to the verie foundation of the Wall of the house, + which was about 3 yeards thick, and found it a matter of great difficultie, we + took to us another gentleman Robert [Wynter] <i>Keys</i><a name="FN470A" id= + "FN470A"></a><sup><a href="#FN470">[470]</a></sup> in like manner with our oathe + and Sacrament as aforesaid.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p><i>D.</i> It was about Christmas when wee brought our myne unto the Wall, and + about Candlemas we had wrought the Wall half through. And whilst they were a + working, I stood as sentinell, to descrie any man that came neare, whereof I gave + them warning, and so they ceased untill I gave them notice agayne to proceede. + All wee seaven lay in the house, and had shott and powder, being resolved to dye + in that place before we should yeild or be taken.</p> + </td> + </tr> + + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="rpad"> + <p><span class='pagenuml'><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[Pg + 272]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>A. The draft.</i>]</p> + + <p>And as they weare workinge, they heard a rushinge in the cellar which grew by + <i>one</i><a name="FN471A" id="FN471A"></a><sup><a href="#FN471">[471]</a></sup> + Brights selling of his coles whereuppon this Examinant, fearinge they had been + discovered, went into the cellar and viewed the cellar, and perceivinge the + commoditye thereof for their purposs, and understandinge how it would be letten + his maister, M<sup>r</sup> Percy, hyred the Cellar for a yeare, for 4 pounds + rent. And confesseth that after Christmas 20<sup>ty</sup> barrells of Powder + weare brought by themselves to a Howse which they had on the Banksyde in Hampers, + and from that Howse removed the powder to the sayd Howse, neere the upper Howse + of Parliament. And presently upon hyringe the cellar, they themselfs removed the + powder into the cellar, and couvered the same with faggots which they had before + layd into the sellar.</p> + + <p>After, about Easter, he went into the Low Countryes,—as he before hath + declared in his former examination,—and that the trew purpos of his goinge + over was least beinge a dangerous man he should be known and suspected, and in + the meane tyme he left the key [of the cellar] with M<sup>r</sup> Percye, whoe in + his absence caused more Billetts to be layd into the Cellar, as in his former + examination he confessed, and retourned about the end of August or the beginninge + of September, and went agayne to the sayd howse, nere to the sayd cellar, and + received the key of the cellar agayne of one of the five. And then they brought + in five or six barrells of powder more into the cellar, which all soe they + couvered with billetts, saving fower little barrells covered with ffaggots, and + then this examinant went into the Country about the end of September.</p> + </td> + + <td class="lpad"> + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[Pg 273]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>B. The Confession as signed.</i>]</p> + + <p><i>E.</i> As they were working upon the wall, they heard a rushing in a cellar + of removing of coles; whereupon wee feared wee had been discovered, and they sent + me to go to the cellar, who fynding that the coles were a selling, and that the + Cellar was to be lett, viewing the commoditye thereof for our purpose, Percy went + and hired the same for yearly Rent.</p> + + <p>Wee had before this provyded and brought into the house 20 barrells of Powder, + which wee removed into the Cellar, and covered the same with billets and fagots, + which we provided for that purpose.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p><i>F.</i> About Easter, the Parliament being proroged tyll October next, wee + dispersed our selfs and I retired into the Low countryes, <i>by advice and + direction of the rest, as well to acquaint Owen with the particulars of the plot, + as also</i><a name="FN472A" id="FN472A"></a><sup><a href="#FN472">[472]</a></sup> + lest by my longer staye I might have grown suspicious, and so have come in + question.</p> + + <p>In the meane tyme Percy, having the key of the Cellar, layd in more powder and + wood into it.</p> + + <p>I returned about the beginning of September next and then receyving the key + againe of Percy, we brought in more powder and billets to cover the same + againe.</p> + </td> + </tr> + + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="rpad"> + <p><span class='pagenuml'><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[Pg + 274]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>A. The draft.</i>]</p> + + <p>* It appeareth the powder was in the cellar, placed as it was found the 5 of + November, when the Lords came to proroge the Parliament, and sayeth that he + returned agayne to the sayd Howse neare the cellar on Wednesday the 30 of + October.</p> + + <p>[He confesseth he was at the Erle of Montgomeryes marriage, but as he sayeth + with noe intention of evill, havinge a sword about him, and was very neere to his + Majesty and the Lords there present.]</p> + + <p>Forasmuch as they knew not well how they should come by the person of the Duke + Charles, beeinge neere London, where they had no forces,—if he had not been + all soe blowne upp,—He confesseth that it was resolved amonge them, that + the same day that this detestable act should have been performed, the same day + should other of their confederacye have surprised the person of the Lady + Elizabeth, and presently have proclaimed her queen [to which purpose a + Proclamation was drawne, as well to avowe and justify the Action, as to have + protested against the Union, and in no sort to have meddeled with Religion + therein. And would have protested all soe agaynst all strangers] and this + proclamation should have been made in the name of the Lady Elizabeth.</p> + + <p>* Beinge demanded why they did not surprise the Kinges person and draw him to + the effectinge of their purpose, sayeth that soe many must have been acquaynted + with such an action as it could not have been kept secrett.</p> + + <p>He confesseth that if their purpose had taken effect untill they had power + enough they would not have avowed the deed to be theirs; but if their + power,—for their defence and safetye,—had been sufficient they + themselfes would have taken it upon them.</p> + </td> + + <td class="lpad"> + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[Pg 275]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>B. The Confession as signed.</i>]</p> + + <p>And so [I] went for a tyme into the country, till the 30 of October.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p><i>G.</i> It was farther resolved amongst us that the same day that this + action should have been performed some other of our confederates should have + surprised the person of the Lady Elizabeth the Kings eldest daughter, who was + kept in Warwickshire at the Lo. Harringtons house, and presently have proclaimed + her for Queene, having a project of a Proclamation ready for the purpose, wherein + we made no mention of altering of Religion,——</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p>—— nor would have avowed the deed to be ours untill we should have + had power enough to make our partie good, and then we would have avowed both.</p> + </td> + </tr> + + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="rpad"> + <p><span class='pagenuml'><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[Pg + 276]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>A. The draft.</i>]</p> + + <p>* They meant all soe to have sent for the Prisoners in the Tower to have come + to them, of whom particularly they had some consultation.</p> + + <p>* He confesseth that the place of Rendez-vous was in Warwickshire, and that + armour was sent thither, but the particuler thereof he knowes not.</p> + + <p>He confesseth that they had consultation for the takinge of the Lady Marye + into their possession, but knew not how to come by her.</p> + + <p>And confesseth that provision was made by some of the conspiracye of some + armour of proofe this last Summer for this Action.</p> + + <p>* He confesseth that the powder was bought of the common Purse of the + Confederates.</p> + + <table> + <tr> + <td class="rpad">L. Admyrall<br /> + L. Chamberlayne<br /> + Erle of Devonshire<br /> + Erle of Northampton<br /> + Erle of Salisbury<br /> + Erle of Marr<br /> + L. cheif Justice</td> + + <td class="td6">}<br /> + }<br /> + }<br /> + }<br /> + }<br /> + }<br /> + }</td> + + <td class="lpad">attended by M<sup>r</sup><br /> + Attorney generall.</td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p>[<i>Endorsed</i>] Examination of Guy Fauks, Nov<sup>r</sup> 8th, 1605.</p> + </td> + + <td class="lpad"> + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[Pg 277]</a></span></p> + + <p class="center">[<i>B. The Confession as signed.</i>]</p> + + <p><i>H.</i> Concerning Duke Charles, the Kings second son, we hadd sundrie + consultations how to sease on his person, but because wee found no meanes how to + compasse it,—the Duke being kept near London,—where we had not forces + enough, wee resolved to serve ourselves with the Lady Elizabeth.</p> + <hr class='c14' /> + + <p><i>J.</i> The names of other principall persons that were made privie + afterwards to this horrible conspiracie.</p> + + <p class="right">[<i>Signed</i>] <span class="smcap">Guido Faukes.</span></p> + + <blockquote> + <p>Everard Digby, Knight<br /> + Ambrose Ruckwood<br /> + Francis Tresham<br /> + John Grant<br /> + Robert [Keys] <i>Wynter</i><br /></p> + </blockquote> + + <p>[<i>Witnessed</i>] Edw. Coke W. Waad.</p> + + <p>[<i>Endorsed</i>] Fawkes his [deposition] <i>declaration 17 Nov. + 1605</i>.<a name="FN473A" id="FN473A"></a><sup><a href= + "#FN473">[473]</a></sup></p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[Pg 278]</a></span></p> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN468" id="FN468"></a><a href="#FN468A">[468]</a></sup> + Alterations and additions (in italics) made by Sir Edward Coke.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN469" id="FN469"></a><a href="#FN469A">[469]</a></sup> + This name has seemingly been tampered with.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN470" id="FN470"></a><a href="#FN470A">[470]</a></sup> + Changed by Cecil; but on November 14th, writing to Edmondes, he included Keyes + amongst those that "wrought not in the myne," and R. Winter amongst those who + did.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN471" id="FN471"></a><a href="#FN471A">[471]</a></sup> + Interlined.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN472" id="FN472"></a><a href="#FN472A">[472]</a></sup> + The words italicised are added in the published version.</p> + + <p class="ni"><sup><a name="FN473" id="FN473"></a><a href="#FN473A">[473]</a></sup> + Words in italics added by Coke.</p> + </div> + <hr class="c2" /> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[Pg 279]</a></span></p> + + <h2 class="g"><a name="INDEX" id="INDEX"></a>INDEX.</h2> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Abbot, Robert, Bishop of Salisbury, his version of the missing + confessions of Faukes, <a href="#Page_192">192</a> <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil">Acton, Robert, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Alabaster, Thomas, a priest in government employ, <a href= + "#Page_204">204</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Andrew, William, servant to Sir E. Digby, evidence of, <a href= + "#Page_78">78</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Annals of England</i>, cited, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Answere to Scandalous papers</i> (Cecil's manifesto), <a href= + "#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a> <i>seq.</i><br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Babington's Plot, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Baldwin, Father William, S.J.; allegations against him, <a href= + "#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a> <i>seq.</i>; which are not + substantiated, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>; correspondence with Father + Schondonck, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Bancroft, Richard, Archbishop of Canterbury, <a href= + "#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Barlow, Thomas, Bishop of Lincoln, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, + <a href="#Page_70">70</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Barnes, a government agent, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Bartlett, George, servant to Catesby, his evidence reported, + <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Bates, Thomas, servant to Catesby, his introduction to the + Conspiracy, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>; his alleged + evidence against Greenway, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>-<a href= + "#Page_183">183</a>; trial and execution, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>. <i>See + also</i> <a href="#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Batty, Matthew, evidence regarding Monteagle, <a href= + "#Page_78">78</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"Blackfriars Downfall," the, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Blount, Father Richard, S.J., on government intelligence, + <a href="#Page_77">77</a>; on Suffolk's proposal of toleration, <a href= + "#Page_224">224</a>; on Cecil's "new stratagem," <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, + <a href="#Page_225">225</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Brayley and Britton (<i>Palace of Westminster</i>), <a href= + "#Page_79">79</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Brewer, Rev. John Sherren, on the fate of Parry, the conspirator, + <a href="#Page_14">14</a>; on government devices, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>; on + Cecil's knowledge of the Plot, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>; on the Monteagle + letter, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Bromley, Sir Henry, Sheriff of Worcestershire, <a href= + "#Page_167">167</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Buck, Mr., alleged warning given to, <a href="#Page_51">51</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Burnet, Gilbert, Bishop of Salisbury, <a href= + "#Page_46">46</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"Bye," the, <a href="#Page_15">15</a> <i>note</i>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Camden, William, the historian, <a href="#Page_36">36</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Capon, William, on the old Palace of Westminster, <a href= + "#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>; on traces of the mine, <a href= + "#Page_87">87</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Carleton, Dudley, afterwards Viscount Dorchester, patronized by + Cecil, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>; assists Percy to hire the house at Westminster, + <a href="#Page_61">61</a>; reports the French version of the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_140">140</a>; and its contradiction, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>; his + mysterious connection with the Conspiracy, <a href="#Page_150">150</a> + <i>note</i>; his opinion of Percy, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[Pg 280]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Castlemaine, Earl of (Roger Palmer), on State plots, <a href= + "#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>; on Osborne's qualifications as an + historian, <a href="#Page_44">44</a> <i>note</i>; on the fate of decoy ducks, + <a href="#Page_152">152</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Carte, Thomas (<i>General History of England</i>), <a href= + "#Page_46">46</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Carey, ——, evidence regarding Percy, <a href= + "#Page_150">150</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Catesby, Robert, a ringleader in the Conspiracy, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; his character and antecedents, + <a href="#Page_35">35</a> <i>seq.</i>; persuades his associates not to reveal + their project to priests, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>; undertakes to proclaim the + new sovereign, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>; his death, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, + <a href="#Page_152">152</a> <i>seq.</i>; suspicions concerning him, <a href= + "#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Catholics, their numbers, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>; their + condition under Elizabeth, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>; their hopes from James, + <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href= + "#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>; his promises to them, <a href= + "#Page_29">29</a>; they welcome his accession, <i>ibid</i>, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>; temporary relief at his hands, <i>ibid</i>; their consequent + increase, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>; Cecil's + hostility, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href= + "#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href= + "#Page_105">105</a>; attempt to charge them with the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_4">4</a>-<a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href= + "#Page_108">108</a>; legislation against them on account of it, <a href= + "#Page_212">212</a> <i>seq.</i>; its lasting effects in their regard, <a href= + "#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil"><a name="Cecil_R" id="Cecil_R"></a>Cecil, Robert, first Earl of + Salisbury, his character, <a href="#Page_19">19</a> <i>seq.</i>; dignities + conferred by James I., <a href="#Page_19">19</a> <i>note</i>; and nicknames, + <a href="#Page_19">19</a> <i>note</i>; his unpopularity, <a href= + "#Page_21">21</a> <i>seq.</i>; difficulties and dangers of his position, <a href= + "#Page_26">26</a> <i>seq.</i>; in the pay of Spain, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>; + and probably of France, <a href="#Page_22">22</a> <i>note</i>; his secret + correspondence with King James, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>; his intrigues against + Northumberland and Raleigh, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href= + "#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>; hostility to the Catholics, + <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href= + "#Page_105">105</a>; anxiety on account of the king's attitude, <a href= + "#Page_28">28</a>; and dealings with Pope Clement VIII., <a href= + "#Page_104">104</a>; endeavours to commit James to a policy of intolerance, + <a href="#Page_105">105</a>; his political methods, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, + <a href="#Page_111">111</a>; employs the services of forgers, <a href= + "#Page_112">112</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>; his knowledge of + the Plot, <a href="#Page_94">94</a> <i>seq.</i>; alleged secret dealings with + Percy, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>; Tresham, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>; and + Catesby, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>; contradicts himself concerning the + "discovery," <a href="#Page_123">123</a> <i>seq.</i>; his inexplicable delay in + making it, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>; and conduct afterwards, <a href= + "#Page_137">137</a>; was not taken by surprise, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>; at + once turns the Plot to his advantage, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>; his + determination to incriminate priests, <a href="#Page_4">4</a> <i>seq.</i>, + <a href="#Page_130">130</a>; advantages reaped by him, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, + <a href="#Page_213">213</a> <i>seq.</i>; his Manifesto, <a href= + "#Page_218">218</a> <i>seq.</i>; suspected of having originated or manipulated + the Conspiracy, <a href="#Page_43">43</a> <i>seq.</i>; alleged attempt to float a + second Plot, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cecil, Thomas, first Earl of Exeter, <a href="#Page_19">19</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><a name="Cecil_W" id="Cecil_W"></a>Cecil, William, second Earl of + Salisbury, his testimony reported, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[Pg 281]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Cecil, William, a priest in government employ, <a href= + "#Page_45">45</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"Cellar," the, its situation and character, <a href= + "#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a> <i>note</i>; hired by the + conspirators, <a href="#Page_69">69</a> <i>seq.</i>; problems concerning it, + <a href="#Page_87">87</a> <i>seq.</i>; its after history, <a href= + "#Page_137">137</a>; accompanies the migrations of the House of Lords, <a href= + "#Page_80">80</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Challoner, Sir Thomas, information addressed to, <a href= + "#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Chamberlain, John, M.P., on Cecil's death and character, <a href= + "#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>; account of the "discovery," + <a href="#Page_128">128</a>; on the King's lucky day, <a href= + "#Page_231">231</a>; on Percy's character, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Charles, Duke of York, afterwards Charles I.; plans of the + conspirators regarding him, <a href="#Page_81">81</a> <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil">Chichester, Sir Arthur, Deputy in Ireland, <a href= + "#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Coal, Father Greenway's description of, <a href="#Page_71">71</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cobham, eighth Lord (Henry Brooke), his charge of forgery against + Waad, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cobham, ninth Lord (William Brooke), his evidence reported, + <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Coke, Sir Edward, Attorney-General, his falsification of + evidence, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>; Cecil's instructions to him, <a href= + "#Page_116">116</a> <i>note</i>; his assertions, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, + <a href="#Page_88">88</a>; interrogatories prepared by him, <a href= + "#Page_176">176</a>; his humour, <a href="#Page_63">63</a> <i>note</i>; proofs + against Owen, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>; witnesses Thomas Winter's declaration, + <a href="#Page_169">169</a>; and that of Faukes, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>; his + treatment of Raleigh and Northumberland, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Coleridge, Lord Chief Justice, on the English penal laws, + <a href="#Page_29">29</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil"><a name="Conspirators" id="Conspirators"></a>Conspirators, the, + list of, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>; their character and + antecedents, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>-<a href="#Page_41">41</a>; their + enrolment, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href= + "#Page_252">252</a>; their plans and proceedings, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>-<a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a> <i>seq.</i>; + mining operations, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>; + incredibility of the story, <a href="#Page_65">65</a> <i>seq.</i>, <a href= + "#Page_76">76</a> <i>seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>; they hire the + "cellar," <a href="#Page_69">69</a> <i>seq.</i>; purchase and store gunpowder, + <a href="#Page_78">78</a>; difficulties concerning it, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, + <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>-<a href= + "#Page_137">137</a>; further designs, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href= + "#Page_80">80</a>-<a href="#Page_82">82</a>; alarmed by the prorogation, <a href= + "#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>; flight and attempted rebellion, + <a href="#Page_2">2</a>; their fate, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>-<a href= + "#Page_6">6</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cope, Sir Walter, on the character of Cecil, <a href= + "#Page_27">27</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cornwallis, Sir Charles, English Ambassador in Spain, on the + character of the conspirators, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>; letter to Father + Cresswell, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>; on the Catholic design to murder Cecil, + <a href="#Page_221">221</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Cresswell, Father Joseph, S.J., allegations concerning him, + <a href="#Page_195">195</a>; Cornwallis' letter to him, <i>ibid</i>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Dacre, Francis, titular Lord, efforts to connect him with the + Plot, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Darnley, Henry, Lord, father of James I., the victim of a + gunpowder plot, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Davenport, Father Christopher, O.P. (Francis à S. Clara), + <a href="#Page_145">145</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Davies, Joseph, a government "discoverer," <a href= + "#Page_94">94</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">De Beaumont, M., French Ambassador, <a href="#Page_119">119</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">De la Boderie, M., French Ambassador, on Cecil's insecurity, + <a href="#Page_26">26</a>; on the ruin of Northumberland, <a href= + "#Page_23">23</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[Pg 282]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Del-Rio, Father Martin, S.J., said to have described the Plot + <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 1600, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Derby, Earl of (William Stanley), attempt to incriminate him, + <a href="#Page_198">198</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">De Ros, Lord, on Faukes' plan of escape, <a href= + "#Page_144">144</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Devonshire, Earl of (Charles Blount), <a href="#Page_168">168</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Digby, Sir Everard, joins the Conspiracy, <a href= + "#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>; difficulties and contradictions + regarding him, <a href="#Page_79">79</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_253">253</a>; his letter to Salisbury, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href= + "#Page_245">245</a>; part assigned to him, <a href="#Page_78">78</a> <i>note</i>; + his fate, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Digby, Sir John, English Ambassador in Spain, <a href= + "#Page_22">22</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Digby, Sir Kenelm, his evidence reported, <a href= + "#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Digby, Sir Robert, <a href="#Page_38">38</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dixon, Hepworth (<i>Her Majesty's Tower</i>), on government + intelligence, <a href="#Page_111">111</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dodd, Rev. Charles, on the origin of the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dorset, Earl of (Thomas Sackville), his esteem for Cecil, + <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dunbar, Earl of (George Hume), <a href="#Page_168">168</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dunfermline, Earl of (Alexander Seaton), on the effective use of + torture, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Dunsmoor Heath, projected hunting match on, <a href= + "#Page_11">11</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Edmondes, Sir Thomas, English Ambassador at Brussels, account of + the "discovery" sent to him, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href= + "#Page_124">124</a>; version of Faukes' confession sent to him, <a href= + "#Page_186">186</a>; proofs against Owen sent to him, <a href= + "#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>; his negotiations with the + archdukes, 186 <i>seq.</i>; letters of, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href= + "#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>; + letters to, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href= + "#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, + <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href= + "#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Elizabeth, Princess, daughter of James I., designs of the + conspirators regarding her, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>England's Warning Peece</i>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, + <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>English Protestants' Plea</i>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, + <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_195">195</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Eudaemon-Joannes, Father Andrew, S.J., <a href= + "#Page_204">204</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Faukes, Guy or Guido, <i>alias</i> John Johnson, his position and + character, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>; his Spanish + mission, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>; introduced to the Conspiracy, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; passes as Percy's servant, <a href= + "#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>; keeps guard while the others work, + <a href="#Page_66">66</a>; discovers the "cellar," <a href="#Page_70">70</a>; has + charge of the premises, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, + <a href="#Page_142">142</a>; visits Flanders, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href= + "#Page_162">162</a>; appointed to fire the powder, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>; plans + for his escape, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>; arrest, <a href= + "#Page_123">123</a>-<a href="#Page_128">128</a>; published confession, <a href= + "#Page_169">169</a> <i>seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a> <i>seq.</i>; + evidence falsified, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>; missing depositions, <a href= + "#Page_191">191</a>; tortured, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href= + "#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>; trial and execution, <a href= + "#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>; fables respecting him, <a href= + "#Page_261">261</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Favat, Mr., Cecil's letter to, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href= + "#Page_182">182</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Ferrers, Henry, sub-lets the house at Westminster to Percy, + <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Fifth of November, a propitious day for the "discovery," <a href= + "#Page_231">231</a>; the day solemnized, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Floyde, Griffith, a government spy, <a href= + "#Page_49">49</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[Pg 283]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">French historians on the Plot, <a href="#Page_141">141</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">French official accounts of the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Fuller, Mr., M.P., <a href="#Page_132">132</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Fuller, Thomas (<i>Church History of Britain</i>), <a href= + "#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Fulman MSS., <a href="#Page_169">169</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Gardiner, Professor Samuel Rawson, his favourable estimate of + Cecil's character, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>; on the Spanish pension, <a href= + "#Page_22">22</a> <i>note</i>; repudiates imputations against the government, + <a href="#Page_18">18</a>; on the conspirators' plans, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>; + on the Monteagle letter, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>; on the king's + interpretation, <a href="#Page_132">132</a> <i>note</i>; on the desire to + incriminate priests, <a href="#Page_4">4</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Garnet, Father Henry, S.J., proclaimed as a principal + conspirator, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>; his capture, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, + <a href="#Page_166">166</a>; lack of evidence, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>; trial and + execution, <i>ibid</i>.; his account of the conspirators' proceedings, <a href= + "#Page_208">208</a>; his evidence against Catesby, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>; + on the accession of James, <a href="#Page_29">29</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Gentleman's Magazine</i>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Gerard, Col. John, <a href="#Page_160">160</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Gerard, Father John, S.J., proclaimed as a principal conspirator, + <a href="#Page_5">5</a>; exonerated by historians, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>; + his history of the Plot, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>; his experiences in the + Tower, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>; on the persecution of Catholics, <a href= + "#Page_32">32</a>; opinion of the "discovery," <a href="#Page_49">49</a>; and of + the official narrative, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>; on the death of Percy and + Catesby, <a href="#Page_156">156</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Goodman, Godfrey, Bishop of Gloucester, on the origin of the + Conspiracy, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>; on the king's promises to Catholics, + <a href="#Page_29">29</a> <i>note</i>; on the persecution of Catholics, <a href= + "#Page_32">32</a>; on the "discovery," <a href="#Page_134">134</a> <i>note</i>; + on the death of Whynniard, <a href="#Page_92">92</a> <i>note</i>; on Percy's + intercourse with Cecil, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>; on the death of Percy and + Catesby, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>; his religious views, <a href= + "#Page_145">145</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Gowrie Conspiracy, the, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href= + "#Page_232">232</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"Great Horses," <a href="#Page_2">2</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Grange, Justice E., <a href="#Page_148">148</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Grant, John, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>. <i>See also</i> + Conspirators.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Green, Mrs. Everett, wrongly describes Owen as a Jesuit, <a href= + "#Page_185">185</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Green, John Richard (<i>History of the English People</i>), + <a href="#Page_30">30</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Greenway, <i>alias</i> Tesimond, Father Oswald, S.J., proclaimed + as a principal conspirator, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>; Bates' alleged evidence + against him, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>-<a href="#Page_183">183</a>; his history + of the Plot, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>; opinion of the official narrative, + <a href="#Page_134">134</a>; on the effects of an explosion, <a href= + "#Page_133">133</a>; on government despatches concerning Percy, <a href= + "#Page_155">155</a>; his visit to the rebels at Huddington, <a href= + "#Page_206">206</a> <i>note</i>; fables respecting him, <a href= + "#Page_264">264</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Gregory, Arthur, a forger employed by government, <a href= + "#Page_203">203</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Grene, Father Martin, S.J., notes on the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_45">45</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Gunpowder, amount procured by the conspirators, <a href= + "#Page_78">78</a>; difficulties concerning it, <a href="#Page_132">132</a> + <i>seq.</i><br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Hagley Hall, R. Winter and S. Littleton captured there, <a href= + "#Page_4">4</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[Pg 284]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Hallam, Henry (<i>Constitutional History</i>), repudiates + imputations against the government, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>; on Father Garnet's + capture, <i>ibid</i>., <i>note</i>; on King James's title to the crown, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Harington, Sir John, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Hawarde, John (<i>Les Reportes del Cases in Camera Stellata</i>), + <a href="#Page_165">165</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Heiwood, or Heywood, Peter, 139 <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_258">258</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Hendlip House (Thomas Abbington's), the scene of Father Garnet's + capture, <a href="#Page_18">18</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Henry, Prince of Wales, anticipations concerning him, <a href= + "#Page_33">33</a>; the conspirators' plans in his regard, <a href= + "#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Herring, Francis (<i>Pietas Pontificia</i>), <a href= + "#Page_27">27</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Higgons, Bevil (<i>English History</i>), <a href= + "#Page_47">47</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Hoby, Sir Edward, on the death of Percy, <a href= + "#Page_154">154</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Holbeche House (Stephen Littleton's), the conspirators there + slain or captured, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">House of Lords, its situation and subsequent migrations, <a href= + "#Page_55">55</a> <i>seq.</i>; never represented in pictures of the Plot, + <a href="#Page_228">228</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">House, Percy's, at Westminster, its position, <a href= + "#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>; circumstances of the bargain for + it, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>; difficulties concerning it, <a href= + "#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href= + "#Page_88">88</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Howes, Edmund (continuation of Stowe's <i>Chronicle</i>), + <a href="#Page_127">127</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Huddington House (Robert Winter's), <a href="#Page_206">206</a> + <i>note</i>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Ichrup, Thomas, name given to Faukes, <a href= + "#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Inglefield, Sir Francis, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">James I., King of Great Britain, his claim to the succession, + <a href="#Page_34">34</a>; circumstances of his accession, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>; hopes of the Catholics, <a href= + "#Page_28">28</a>; who support his cause, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>; his policy + at first favourable to them, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>; soon reversed, <a href= + "#Page_31">31</a>; his dealings with Pope Clement VIII., <a href= + "#Page_104">104</a>; his supposed interpretation of the letter, <a href= + "#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>; Tuesday his lucky day, <a href= + "#Page_230">230</a>; his speech to Parliament, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>; + accuses Catholics in general and the Pope, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>; suspected of + previous knowledge of the Plot, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>; anxiety for evidence + against priests, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>; letter to the Archdukes, <a href= + "#Page_187">187</a> <i>note</i>; alleged subsequent opinion of the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_45">45</a>; instructions for the torture of Faukes, <a href= + "#Page_259">259</a>; his Scotch dialect, <a href="#Page_260">260</a> <i>note</i>; + gives his royal word against Owen and Baldwin, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>; his + policy permanently affected, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">James, John, a supposed Dominican, <a href="#Page_139">139</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Jardine, David, on the character of the official narrative, + <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>; on the falsification of + evidence, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>; on the Monteagle letter, <a href= + "#Page_117">117</a>; on the king's interpretation, <a href="#Page_132">132</a> + <i>note</i>; on the established facts of the case, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>; not + perfectly impartial, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>; on + the results of the Plot, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Jessopp, Augustus, D.D., on the value of money, <a href= + "#Page_36">36</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a> <i>note</i>; on Father + Gerard's innocence, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Jesuits, efforts to incriminate, <a href="#Page_177">177</a> + <i>note</i>; Cecil on their "insolencies," <a href="#Page_106">106</a>.<br /> + </p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[Pg 285]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Kennet, White, Bishop of Peterborough, <a href="#Page_45">45</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Keyes, Robert, contradictions respecting him, <a href= + "#Page_84">84</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>. <i>See also</i> + <a href="#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"King's Book," the, its character, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>; + Cecil's description of it, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= + "#Page_220">220</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Knyvet, or Knevet, Sir Thomas, leads the party which captures + Faukes, <a href="#Page_124">124</a> <i>seq.</i>; receives a peerage, <a href= + "#Page_139">139</a> <i>note</i>; the Countess of Suffolk his sister, <a href= + "#Page_224">224</a> <i>note</i>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Lake, Sir Thomas, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href= + "#Page_232">232</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Lenthal, William, Speaker of the Long Parliament, his evidence + reported, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Lindsay, Sir James, conveys messages between King James and Pope + Clement VIII., <a href="#Page_104">104</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Lingard, John, D.D., <a href="#Page_68">68</a> <i>note</i>, + <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Littleton, Humphrey, <a href="#Page_167">167</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Littleton, Stephen, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href= + "#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Lodge, Edmund, F.S.A. (<i>Illustrations of British History</i>), + <a href="#Page_98">98</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Lopez' Plot, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">"Main," the, <a href="#Page_15">15</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Mar, Earl of (John Erskine), <a href="#Page_168">168</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Mary, Princess, daughter of James I., <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, + <a href="#Page_176">176</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Milton, poems on the Plot, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Mine, the, story told respecting it, <a href="#Page_63">63</a> + <i>seq.</i>; difficulties respecting it, <a href="#Page_84">84</a> + <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Mischeefe's Mystery</i>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href= + "#Page_115">115</a>, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, + <a href="#Page_153">153</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Money, value of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_117">117</a> <i>note</i>; amount raised by conspirators, <a href= + "#Page_39">39</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Monteagle, Lord (William Parker), his character and antecedents, + <a href="#Page_118">118</a>; relations with the king and court, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>; letter to the king, <a href= + "#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>; connection with the + conspirators, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>; communicates the warning letter to + Cecil, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>-<a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href= + "#Page_160">160</a>; attends parliament on the day of the "discovery," <a href= + "#Page_137">137</a> <i>note</i>; devices of the government on his behalf, + <a href="#Page_116">116</a>; rewards conferred, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>; + subsequent conduct, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Moore, Sir Francis, his evidence reported, <a href= + "#Page_151">151</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Moore, Sir Jonas, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">More, Father Henry, S.J., <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Morgan, Harry, <a href="#Page_81">81</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Morgan, Thomas, <a href="#Page_157">157</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_193">193</a> <i>note</i>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Naunton, Sir Robert, on Cecil's character, <a href= + "#Page_19">19</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Northampton, Earl of (Henry Howard), a nominal Catholic promoted + by King James, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>; Cecil's agent in his secret + correspondence, <a href="#Page_26">26</a> <i>note</i>; on Cecil's death, <a href= + "#Page_23">23</a>; on the history of the "cellar," <a href="#Page_58">58</a> + <i>note</i>; not admitted to all Cecil's secrets, <a href= + "#Page_112">112</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Northumberland, Earl of (Henry Percy), a rival of Cecil's, + <a href="#Page_26">26</a>; who secretly traduces him, <a href="#Page_26">26</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>; the Plot + turned to his ruin, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, + <a href="#Page_216">216</a>-<a href="#Page_218">218</a>; which is attributed to + Cecil, <a href="#Page_26">26</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, his + sentiments in return, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Nottingham, Earl of, Lord Admiral (Charles Howard), <a href= + "#Page_170">170</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[Pg 286]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Oates, Titus, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href= + "#Page_138">138</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Oath taken by the conspirators, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Oldcorne, <i>alias</i> Hall, Father Edward, S.J., captured along + with Garnet, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>; never accused of complicity <i>ib.</i>; + Catholic demonstration at his execution, <a href="#Page_28">28</a> <i>note</i>; + tortured, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Oldmixon (<i>Royal House of Stuart</i>), <a href= + "#Page_25">25</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Osborne, Francis, on Cecil's unpopularity, <a href= + "#Page_25">25</a>; on the "discovery," <a href="#Page_44">44</a>; on the 5th of + August celebration, <a href="#Page_232">232</a> <i>note</i>; on Northumberland + and Cecil, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>; his qualifications as an historian, + <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Owen, Captain Hugh, falsely described as a Jesuit, <a href= + "#Page_173">173</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_185">185</a> <i>note</i>; + particularly obnoxious to the government, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href= + "#Page_185">185</a>; evidence fabricated against him, <a href= + "#Page_174">174</a>; Cecil's instruction respecting him, <a href= + "#Page_116">116</a> <i>note</i>; efforts made to secure him, <a href= + "#Page_185">185</a> <i>seq.</i>; his intercourse with Phelippes, <a href= + "#Page_112">112</a>, <a href="#Page_185">185</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Owen, Lewis, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Paris, Henry, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Parliament, its successive adjournments, <a href= + "#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>; + meets on the day of the "discovery," <a href="#Page_136">136</a>; activity + against Catholics, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a> + <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil">Parry, Sir Thomas, English Ambassador at Paris, instructions + given to, <a href="#Page_28">28</a> <i>note</i>; intelligence supplied by, + <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href= + "#Page_102">102</a>; account of the discovery furnished to, <a href= + "#Page_126">126</a> <i>seq.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil">Parry, Dr. William, his Plot, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href= + "#Page_153">153</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Parsons, Father Robert, S.J., letters to, <a href= + "#Page_29">29</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href= + "#Page_223">223</a>; his views as to the succession, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>; + on Walsingham's "spyery," <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Percy, Sir Charles, <a href="#Page_192">192</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Percy, Thomas, one of the first and principal conspirators, + <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; his antecedents, <a href= + "#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>; house + hired by him, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>; and "cellar," <a href="#Page_75">75</a>; + strange conduct in both transactions, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>; conduct + afterwards, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>; undertakes to + seize Duke Charles or Princess Elizabeth, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>; his death, + <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a> <i>seq.</i>; profession of + religious zeal, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>; bigamy, <i>ibid</i>; Catholics + suspicious of him, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>; alleged secret dealings with + Cecil, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>; the case against him, <a href= + "#Page_148">148</a>-<a href="#Page_156">156</a>. <i>See also</i> + Conspirators.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Phelippes, Thomas, the "decipherer," employed by the government, + <a href="#Page_111">111</a>; their devices against him, <a href= + "#Page_112">112</a>; correspondence with Hugh Owen, <a href="#Page_185">185</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Pickering, Mr., and his horse, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>. + <i>Plain and Rational Account of the Catholick Faith</i>, <a href= + "#Page_49">49</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Plots under Elizabeth and James I., <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, + <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href= + "#Page_157">157</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a> <i>note</i>; their + common feature, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><a name="Politicians_C" id="Politicians_C"></a><i>Polititian's + Catechism</i>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Pope Clement VIII., interchanges communications with James I., + <a href="#Page_104">104</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Pope Paul V., represented as an accomplice in the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Popham, Sir John, Lord Chief Justice, <a href="#Page_170">170</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Raleigh, Sir Walter, Cecil's enmity towards him, <a href= + "#Page_26">26</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_198">198</a>; his ruin, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href= + "#Page_216">216</a>; attempt to implicate him in the Powder Plot, <a href= + "#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[Pg 287]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Ratcliffe, Ralph, a government spy, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, + <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Rich, Sir Edwin, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Richardot, President, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Rogers, Professor Thorold, on the value of money, <a href= + "#Page_117">117</a> <i>note</i>; on James's title to the throne, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Rokewood, Ambrose, <a href="#Page_179">179</a> <i>note</i>. + <i>See also</i> <a href="#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Salisbury, first Earl of. <i>See</i> <a href="#Cecil_R">Cecil, + Robert</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Salisbury, second Earl of. <i>See</i> <a href="#Cecil_W">Cecil, + William</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Sanderson, Sir William, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Schondonck, Father Giles, S.J., Rector of St. Omers, on the + innocence of the Jesuits, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>; on Cecil's manifesto, + <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Scott, Sir Walter, <a href="#Page_132">132</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Shakespeare, never alludes to the Plot, <a href= + "#Page_226">226</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Sharpe, Dr. R.R., <a href="#Page_262">262</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Shepherd, John, evidence of, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Smith, John Thomas (<i>Antiquities of Westminster</i>), <a href= + "#Page_58">58</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a> <i>note</i>, <a href= + "#Page_89">89</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Soane, Sir John, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Southwaick, or Southwell, a government spy, <a href= + "#Page_99">99</a>-<a href="#Page_102">102</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Speed, John (<i>Historie</i>), <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, + <a href="#Page_63">63</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Squires, Edward, his plot, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Stanley, Sir William, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>, <a href= + "#Page_192">192</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Strange, Father Thomas, S.J., <a href="#Page_96">96</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Streete, John, pensioned for killing Percy and Catesby, <a href= + "#Page_155">155</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Strype, John (<i>Annals</i>), <a href="#Page_28">28</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Suffolk, Earl of, Lord Chamberlain (Thomas Howard), his venality, + <a href="#Page_224">224</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Talbot, John, of Grafton, <a href="#Page_38">38</a> + <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Talbot, Peter, Archbishop of Dublin. <i>See <a href= + "#Politicians_C">Polititian's Catechism</a>.</i></p> + + <p class="jhil">Theobald, Lewis, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Topcliffe, Richard, priest-hunter, <a href= + "#Page_202">202</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Torture, use of, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href= + "#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, + <a href="#Page_201">201</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href= + "#Page_260">260</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Tresham, Francis, enlisted in the enterprise, <a href= + "#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_252">252</a> <i>seq.</i>; his previous record, + <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>; his action on behalf of + King James, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>; suspected of writing the warning letter, + <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>; and of collusion with + Cecil, <i>ibid.</i>; his conduct after the "discovery," <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, + <a href="#Page_158">158</a>; his death in the Tower, <a href="#Page_6">6</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Tresham, Sir Thomas, proclaims King James, <a href= + "#Page_34">34</a>; summoned to Court, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>True and Perfect Relation</i>, character of the narrative, + <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Tytler, Patrick Fraser, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Usher, James, Archbishop of Armagh, his evidence reported, + <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Venatio Catholica</i>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil"><i>Vetusta Monumenta</i>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href= + "#Page_86">86</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Villeroy, M., on Cecil's duplicity, <a href= + "#Page_23">23</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">"Vinegar House," <a href="#Page_60">60</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Vowell, Peter, evidence reported, <a href= + "#Page_160">160</a>.<br /> + </p> + + <p class="jhil">Waad, Sir William, lieutenant of the Tower, charged by Cobham + with forgery of evidence, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>; dismissed from his post, + <a href="#Page_203">203</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>; his + inscriptions in the Tower, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>, <a href= + "#Page_267">267</a>; letters to Cecil, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href= + "#Page_258">258</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[Pg 288]</a></span></p> + + <table> + <tr valign="top"> + <td class="td80jhil"> + <p class="jhil">Walsh, Sir Richard, sheriff of Worcestershire, <a href= + "#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Ward, Samuel, preacher and artist, <a href= + "#Page_239">239</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Webb, John, evidence reported, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Weldon, Sir Anthony, on Cecil's unpopularity, <a href= + "#Page_25">25</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Welwood, James (<i>Memoirs</i>), <a href="#Page_46">46</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Westmoreland, titular Earl of (Henry Neville), attempt to + implicate him, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Whynniard, Mr., landlord of Percy's house, <a href= + "#Page_61">61</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>; his sudden death, + <a href="#Page_92">92</a> <i>note</i>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Whynniard, Mrs., evidence of, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href= + "#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href= + "#Page_142">142</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Willaston, William, intelligence supplied by, <a href= + "#Page_99">99</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wimbledon, Viscount (Edward Cecil), his evidence reported, + <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Windsor, Lord, his house plundered by the conspirators, <a href= + "#Page_2">2</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Winter, Robert, introduced to the conspiracy, <a href= + "#Page_10">10</a>; captured at Hagley, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>; evidences of foul + play in his regard, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>; + trial and execution, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + </td> + + <td class="td80jhir"> + <p class="jhil">Winter, Thomas, one of the first conspirators, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; character, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>; + Spanish mission, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>; brings + Faukes from Flanders, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>; attends the prorogation, Oct. 3rd, + <a href="#Page_74">74</a> <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>; captured at + Holbeche, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>; his published confession, <a href= + "#Page_167">167</a> <i>seq.</i>; probably tortured, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>; + trial and execution, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wood, Anthony à, notes addressed to, <a href= + "#Page_159">159</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Worcester, Earl of (Edward Somerset), <a href="#Page_168">168</a> + <i>note</i>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wotton, Sir Henry, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wren, Sir Christopher, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wright, Christopher, his introduction to the Conspiracy, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; character, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, + <a href="#Page_37">37</a>; previous employment in Spain, <a href= + "#Page_36">36</a>; killed at Holbeche, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href= + "#Page_152">152</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wright, Henry, his informations, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, + <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>.</p> + + <p class="jhil">Wright, John, one of the first conspirators, <a href= + "#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; character, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, + <a href="#Page_37">37</a>; killed at Holbeche, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href= + "#Page_152">152</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href= + "#Conspirators">Conspirators</a>.</p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + + <h5 class="smcap"><span class="c17">chiswick press:—charles whittingham and + co.</span><br /> + tooks court, chancery lane, london.</h5> + + <div class="footnotes"> + <p class="ni">TRANSCRIBERS' NOTES</p> + + <ul> + <li>p 14: there is no closing quotation mark following the line '"making and + fomenting plots was then in fashion; nor can it be denied that good grounds for + such an opinion were not lacking.' The closing mark is placed at the end of this + sentence, though this may be incorrect.</li> + + <li>p 20: continuation of footnote 37 from previous page begins with 'avor'; this + is a typo for 'favor'.</li> + + <li>p 24: 'the' repeated in footnote 49, epigram 2; one 'the' removed.</li> + + <li>p 32: added a closing quotation mark following 'and prepared for them'.</li> + + <li>p 36: added . to end of footnote 87, after 'The Spanish Treason'.</li> + + <li>p 49: inserted , into footnote 124; 'James I., lxxxi.'</li> + + <li>p 120: footnote 257: missing closing bracket; corrected.</li> + + <li>p 154: inserted , into footnote 310; 'James I., i. 588'.</li> + + <li>p 160: changed ' to " to match quote mark style, footnote 329.</li> + + <li>p 194: footnote 396: 'Englands' changed to 'England's'.</li> + + <li>p 248: added missing full-stop: 'give ease to Catholics'.</li> + + <li>p 255: added opening double-quote marks to the passage entitled 'Application to + the King.'</li> + + <li>p 281: 'incrediblty' changed to 'incredibility', 'o' changed to 'of'.</li> + </ul> + </div> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg's What was the Gunpowder Plot?, by John Gerard + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WHAT WAS THE GUNPOWDER PLOT? *** + +***** This file should be named 34807-h.htm or 34807-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/8/0/34807/ + +Produced by Robert Cicconetti, Adam Styles and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> |