diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:56:58 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:56:58 -0700 |
| commit | de3ee9e7209d19f6a55d2f55d78fb379d6d0af3b (patch) | |
| tree | 44cf4bb781cc589750f0d13b8485bfe295216a5d /32063-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '32063-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/32063-h.htm | 6917 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img861a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 8178 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img861b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 5417 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img862.jpg | bin | 0 -> 4475 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img865.jpg | bin | 0 -> 9217 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img866a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 3541 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img866b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 20927 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img868a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 14997 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img868b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 3567 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img868c.jpg | bin | 0 -> 3253 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img871.jpg | bin | 0 -> 14791 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img872.jpg | bin | 0 -> 14354 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img875.jpg | bin | 0 -> 4336 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img877.jpg | bin | 0 -> 24829 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img881a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 19690 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img881b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 25958 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img883.jpg | bin | 0 -> 63801 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img884a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 21222 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img884b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 32936 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img885.jpg | bin | 0 -> 14910 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img887a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 5701 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img887b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15317 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img888.jpg | bin | 0 -> 9680 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img889a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 3458 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img889b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 7856 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 32063-h/images/img890.jpg | bin | 0 -> 5375 bytes |
26 files changed, 6917 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/32063-h/32063-h.htm b/32063-h/32063-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..818cb7d --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/32063-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,6917 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content= + "text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> + + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume VI slice VIII - Conduction, Electric. + </title> + + <style type="text/css"> + + body { margin-left: 12%; margin-right: 12%; text-align: justify; } + p { margin-top: .75em; margin-bottom: .75em; text-indent: 1em; line-height: 1.4em;} + p.tab { margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em; } + p.c { margin-top: .25em; margin-bottom: .25em; text-indent: 1em; padding-left: 1em; line-height: 1.4em;} + p.noind { margin-top: .75em; margin-bottom: .75em; text-indent: 0; } + + h2,h3 { text-align: center; } + hr { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center; width: 70%; height: 5px; background-color: #dcdcdc; border:none; } + hr.art { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 40%; height: 5px; background-color: #778899; + margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 6em } + hr.foot {margin-left: 2em; width: 16%; background-color: black; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 0; height: 1px; } + hr.full {width: 100%} + + table.ws {white-space: nowrap; border-collapse: collapse; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; + margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;} + table.reg { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; clear: both; } + table.nobctr { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border-collapse: collapse; } + table.pic { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } + table.math0 { vertical-align: middle; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border-collapse: collapse;} + table.math0 td {text-align: center;} + table.math0 td.np {text-align: center; padding-left: 0; padding-right: 0;} + + table.reg td { padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -2em; white-space: normal;} + table.reg td.tc5p { padding-left: 2em; text-indent: 0em; white-space: normal;} + table.nobctr td { white-space: normal; } + table.pic td { white-space: normal; text-indent: 1em; padding-left: 2em; padding-right: 1em;} + table.nobctr p {text-indent: -1em; margin-left: 1em;} + + td { white-space: nowrap; padding-right: 0.3em; padding-left: 0.3em;} + td.norm { white-space: normal; } + td.denom { border-top: 1px solid black; text-align: center; padding-right: 0.3em; padding-left: 0.3em;} + + td.tcc { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: center; vertical-align: top;} + td.tccm { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;} + td.tccb { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: center; vertical-align: bottom;} + td.tcr { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;} + td.tcrm { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: right; vertical-align: middle;} + td.tcl { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: left; vertical-align: top;} + td.tclm { padding-right: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; text-align: left; vertical-align: middle;} + td.vb { vertical-align: bottom; } + + .caption { font-size: 0.9em; text-align: center; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em;} + .caption1 { font-size: 0.9em; text-align: left; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 3em; padding-right: 2em;} + + td.lb {border-left: black 1px solid;} + td.ltb {border-left: black 1px solid; border-top: black 1px solid;} + td.rb {border-right: black 1px solid;} + td.rb2 {border-right: black 2px solid;} + td.tb, span.tb {border-top: black 1px solid;} + td.bb {border-bottom: black 1px solid;} + td.rlb {border-right: black 1px solid; border-left : black 1px solid;} + td.allb {border: black 1px solid;} + + table p { margin: 0;} + + a:link, a:visited, link {text-decoration:none} + + .author {text-align: right; margin-top: -1em; margin-right: 1em; font-variant: small-caps;} + .center {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;} + .center1 {text-align: center; text-indent: 0; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;} + .grk {font-style: normal; font-family:"Palatino Linotype","New Athena Unicode",Gentium,"Lucida Grande", Galilee, "Arial Unicode MS", sans-serif;} + + .f80 {font-size: 80%} + .f90 {font-size: 90%} + .f150 {font-size: 150%; font-family: 'Courier New'} + .f200 {font-size: 200%; font-family: 'Courier New'} + .f250 {font-size: 250%; font-family: 'Courier New'; letter-spacing: -0.1em;} + + .sp {position: relative; bottom: 0.5em; font-size: 0.75em;} + .sp1 {position: relative; bottom: 0.6em; font-size: 0.75em;} + .su {position: relative; top: 0.3em; font-size: 0.75em;} + .su1 {position: relative; top: 0.5em; font-size: 0.75em; margin-left: -1.2ex;} + .su2 {position: relative; top: 0.8em; font-size: 0.75em; margin-left: -1.9ex;} + .spp {position: relative; bottom: 0.5em; font-size: 0.6em;} + .suu {position: relative; top: 0.2em; font-size: 0.6em;} + .sc {font-variant: small-caps;} + .scs {font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 70%;} + .ov {text-decoration: overline} + .cl {background-color: #f5f5f5;} + + .pagenum {position: absolute; right: 5%; text-align: right; font-size: 10pt; + background-color: #f5f5f5; color: #778899; text-indent: 0; + padding-left: 0.5em; padding-right: 0.5em; font-style: normal; } + span.sidenote {width: 8em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1.7em; margin-right: 2em; + font-size: 85%; float: left; clear: left; font-weight: bold; + font-style: italic; text-align: left; text-indent: 0; + background-color: #f5f5f5; color: black; } + .note {margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 0.9em; } + .fn { position: absolute; left: 12%; text-align: left; background-color: #f5f5f5; + text-indent: 0; padding-left: 0.2em; padding-right: 0.2em; } + span.correction {border-bottom: 1px dashed red;} + + div.poemr { margin-top: .75em; margin-bottom: .75em;} + div.poemr p { margin-left: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em; margin-top: 0em; margin-bottom: 0em; } + div.poemr p.s { margin-top: 1.5em; } + div.poemr p.i05 { margin-left: 0.4em; } + div.poemr p.i2 { margin-left: 2em; } + div.poemr p.i4 { margin-left: 4em; } + + .figright1 { padding-right: 1em; padding-left: 2em; padding-top: 1.5em; text-align: center; } + .figleft1 { padding-right: 2em; padding-left: 1em; padding-top: 1.5em; text-align: center; } + .figcenter {text-align: center; margin: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding-top: 1.5em;} + .figcenter1 {text-align: center; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding-top: 2em; padding-bottom: 2em;} + .figure {text-align: center; padding-left: 1.5em; padding-right: 1.5em; padding-top: 1.5em; padding-bottom: 0;} + .bold {font-weight: bold; } + + div.minind {text-align: justify;} + div.condensed, div.condensed1 { line-height: 1.3em; margin-left: 3%; margin-right: 3%; font-size: 95%; } + div.condensed1 p {margin-left: 0; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;} + div.condensed span.sidenote {font-size: 90%} + + div.list {margin-left: 0;} + div.list p {padding-left: 6em; text-indent: -3em;} + + .pt05 {padding-top: 0.5em;} + .pt2 {padding-top: 2em;} + .ptb1 {padding-top: 1em; padding-bottom: 1em;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, +Volume 6, Slice 8, by Various + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 6, Slice 8 + "Conduction, Electric" + +Author: Various + +Release Date: April 19, 2010 [EBook #32063] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENCYC. BRITANNICA, VOL 6, SL 8 *** + + + + +Produced by Marius Masi, Don Kretz, Juliet Sutherland, and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + + +<table border="0" cellpadding="10" style="background-color: #dcdcdc; color: #696969; " summary="Transcriber's note"> +<tr> +<td style="width:25%; vertical-align:top"> +Transcriber's note: +</td> +<td class="norm"> +A few typographical errors have been corrected. They +appear in the text <span class="correction" title="explanation will pop up">like this</span>, and the +explanation will appear when the mouse pointer is moved over the marked +passage. Sections in Greek will yield a transliteration +when the pointer is moved over them, and words using diacritic characters in the +Latin Extended Additional block, which may not display in some fonts or browsers, will +display an unaccented version. <br /><br /> +<a name="artlinks">Links to other EB articles:</a> Links to articles residing in other EB volumes will +be made available when the respective volumes are introduced online. +</td> +</tr> +</table> +<div style="padding-top: 3em; "> </div> + + +<h2>THE ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA</h2> + +<h2>A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, LITERATURE AND GENERAL INFORMATION</h2> + +<h3>ELEVENTH EDITION</h3> +<div style="padding-top: 3em; "> </div> + + +<hr class="full" /> +<h3>VOLUME VI SLICE VIII<br /><br /> +Conduction, Electric</h3> +<hr class="full" /> +<div style="padding-top: 3em; "> </div> + +<p class="center1" style="font-size: 180%;">Articles in This Slice</p> +<p class="pt2"><a href="#ar1">CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC</a></p> +<div style="padding-top: 3em; "> </div> + +<hr class="art" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page855" id="page855"></a>855</span></p> + +<p><span class="bold"> <a name="ar1" id="ar1">CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC.</a></span> The electric conductivity of a +substance is that property in virtue of which all its parts come +spontaneously to the same electric potential if the substance is +kept free from the operation of electric force. Accordingly, the +reciprocal quality, electric resistivity, may be defined as a +quality of a substance in virtue of which a difference of potential +can exist between different portions of the body when these are +in contact with some constant source of electromotive force, in +such a manner as to form part of an electric circuit.</p> + +<p>All material substances possess in some degree, large or small, +electric conductivity, and may for the sake of convenience be +broadly divided into five classes in this respect. Between these, +however, there is no sharply-marked dividing line, and the +classification must therefore be accepted as a more or less +arbitrary one. These divisions are: (1) metallic conductors, +(2) non-metallic conductors, (3) dielectric conductors, (4) electrolytic +conductors, (5) gaseous conductors. The first class comprises +all metallic substances, and those mixtures or combinations +of metallic substances known as alloys. The second includes +such non-metallic bodies as carbon, silicon, many of the oxides +and peroxides of the metals, and probably also some oxides of +the non-metals, sulphides and selenides. Many of these substances, +for instance carbon and silicon, are well-known to have +the property of existing in several allotropic forms, and in some +of these conditions, so far from being fairly good conductors, +they may be almost perfect non-conductors. An example of +this is seen in the case of carbon in its three allotropic conditions—charcoal, +graphite and diamond. As charcoal it possesses a +fairly well-marked but not very high conductivity in comparison +with metals; as graphite, a conductivity about one-four-hundredth +of that of iron; but as diamond so little conductivity +that the substance is included amongst insulators or non-conductors. +The third class includes those substances which are +generally called insulators or non-conductors, but which are +better denominated dielectric conductors; it comprises such +solid substances as mica, ebonite, shellac, india-rubber, gutta-percha, +paraffin, and a large number of liquids, chiefly hydrocarbons. +These substances differ greatly in insulating power, +and according as the conductivity is more or less marked, they +are spoken of as bad or good insulators. Amongst the latter +many of the liquid gases hold a high position. Thus, liquid +oxygen and liquid air have been shown by Sir James Dewar +to be almost perfect non-conductors of electricity.</p> + +<p>The behaviour of substances which fall into these three classes +is discussed below in section I., dealing with metallic conduction.</p> + +<p>The fourth class, namely the electrolytic conductors comprises +all those substances which undergo chemical decomposition +when they form part of an electric circuit traversed by an +electric current. They are discussed in section II., dealing with +electrolytic conduction.</p> + +<p>The fifth and last class of conductors includes the gases. The +conditions under which this class of substance becomes possessed +of electric conductivity are considered in section III., on conduction +in gases.</p> + +<p>In connexion with metallic conductors, it is a fact of great +interest and considerable practical importance, that, although +the majority of metals when in a finely divided or powdered +condition are practically non-conductors, a mass of metallic +powder or filings may be made to pass suddenly into a conductive +condition by being exposed to the influence of an electric wave. +The same is true of the loose contact of two metallic conductors. +Thus if a steel point, such as a needle, presses very lightly +against a metallic plate, say of aluminium, it is found that this +metallic contact, if carefully adjusted, is non-conductive, but +that if an electric wave is created anywhere in the neighbourhood, +this non-conducting contact passes into a conductive state. +This fact, investigated and discovered independently by D. E. +Hughes, C. Onesti, E. Branly, O. J. Lodge and others, is applied +in the construction of the “coherer,” or sensitive tube employed +as a detector or receiver in that form of “wireless telegraphy” +chiefly developed by Marconi. Further references to it are +made in the articles <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electric Waves</a></span> and <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Telegraphy</a></span>: +<i>Wireless</i>.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p><i>International Ohm.</i>—The practical unit of electrical resistance +was legally defined in Great Britain by the authority of the queen +in council in 1894, as the “resistance offered to an invariable electric +current by a column of mercury at the temperature of melting ice, +14.4521 grammes in mass, of a constant cross-sectional area, and a +length 106.3 centimetres.” The same unit has been also legalized +as a standard in France, Germany and the United States, and is +denominated the “International or Standard Ohm.” It is intended +to represent as nearly as possible a resistance equal to 10° absolute +C.G.S. units of electric resistance. Convenient multiples and subdivisions +of the ohm are the microhm and the megohm, the former +being a millionth part of an ohm, and the latter a million ohms. +The resistivity of substances is then numerically expressed by stating +the resistance of one cubic centimetre of the substance taken between +opposed faces, and expressed in ohms, microhms or megohms, as +may be most convenient. The reciprocal of the ohm is called the +mho, which is the unit of conductivity, and is defined as the conductivity +of a substance whose resistance is one ohm. The absolute +unit of conductivity is the conductivity of a substance whose resistivity +is one absolute C.G.S. unit, or one-thousandth-millionth part +of an ohm. Resistivity is a quality in which material substances +differ very widely. The metals and alloys, broadly speaking, are +good conductors, and their resistivity is conveniently expressed in +microhms per cubic centimetre, or in absolute C.G.S. units. Very +small differences in density and in chemical purity make, however, +immense differences in electric resistivity; hence the values given +by different experimentalists for the resistivity of known metals +differ to a considerable extent.</p> +</div> + +<p class="center1">I. <span class="sc">Conduction in Solids</span></p> + +<p>It is found convenient to express the resistivity of metals in two +different ways: (1) We may state the resistivity of one cubic +centimetre of the material in microhms or absolute units taken +between opposed faces. This is called the <i>volume-resistivity</i>; (2) +we may express the resistivity by stating the resistance in ohms +offered by a wire of the material in question of uniform cross-section +one metre in length, and one gramme in weight. This +numerical measure of the resistivity is called the <i>mass-resistivity</i>. +The mass-resistivity of a body is connected with its volume-resistivity +and the density of the material in the following +manner:—The mass-resistivity, expressed in microhms per metre-gramme, +divided by 10 times the density is numerically equal to +the volume-resistivity per centimetre-cube in absolute C.G.S. +units. The mass-resistivity per metre-gramme can always be +obtained by measuring the resistance and the mass of any wire of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page856" id="page856"></a>856</span> +uniform cross-section of which the length is known, and if the +density of the substance is then measured, the volume-resistivity +can be immediately calculated.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>If R is the resistance in ohms of a wire of length l, uniform cross-section +s, and density d, then taking ρ for the volume-resistivity we +have 10<span class="sp">9</span>R = ρl/s; but lsd = M, where M is the mass of the wire. +Hence 10<span class="sp">9</span>R = ρdl<span class="sp">2</span>/M. If l = 100 and M = 1, then R = ρ′= resistivity in +ohms per metre-gramme, and 10<span class="sp">9</span>ρ′ = 10,000dρ, or ρ = 10<span class="sp">5</span>ρ′/d, and +ρ′ = 10,000MR/l<span class="sp">2</span>.</p> + +<p>The following rules, therefore, are useful in connexion with +these measurements. To obtain the mass-resistivity per metre-gramme +of a substance in the form of a uniform metallic wire:—Multiply +together 10,000 times the mass in grammes and the total +resistance in ohms, and then divide by the square of the length in +centimetres. Again, to obtain the volume-resistivity in C.G.S. units +per centimetre-cube, the rule is to multiply the mass-resistivity in +ohms by 100,000 and divide by the density. These rules, of course, +apply only to wires of uniform cross-section. In the following +Tables I., II. and III. are given the mass and volume resistivity of +ordinary metals and certain alloys expressed in terms of the international +ohm or the absolute C.G.S. unit of resistance, the values +being calculated from the experiments of A. Matthiessen (1831-1870) +between 1860 and 1865, and from later results obtained by +J. A. Fleming and Sir James Dewar in 1893.</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table I.</span>—<i>Electric Mass-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0° C., or +Resistance per Metre-gramme in International Ohms at 0° C.</i> +(Matthiessen.)</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Metal.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Resistance at 0° C.<br />in International Ohms<br />of a Wire 1 Metre long<br />and Weighing 1 Gramme.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Approximate Temperature<br />Coefficient near 20° C.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Silver (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.1523   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00377</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Silver (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.1657   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.1421   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00388</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcl rb">.1449 (Matthiessen’s Standard)</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.4025   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00365</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.4094   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aluminium (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.0757   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Zinc (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.4013   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1.9337   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Iron (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.765   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nickel (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1.058<a name="FnAnchor_1" id="FnAnchor_1" href="#Footnote_1"><span class="sp">1</span></a>   </td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Tin (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">.9618   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00365</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Lead (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2.2268   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00387</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Antimony (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2.3787   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00389</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Bismuth (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">12.8554<a href="#Footnote_1"><span class="sp">1</span></a>   </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.00354</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Mercury (liquid)</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">12.885<a name="FnAnchor_2" id="FnAnchor_2" href="#Footnote_2"><span class="sp">2</span></a>   </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">0.00072</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>The data commonly used for calculating metallic resistivities +were obtained by A. Matthiessen, and his results are set out in the +Table II. which is taken from Cantor lectures given by Fleeming +Jenkin in 1866 at or about the date when the researches were made. +The figures given by Jenkin have, however, been reduced to international +ohms and C.G.S. units by multiplying by (π/4)×0.9866 × +10<span class="sp">5</span> = 77,485.</p> + +<p>Subsequently numerous determinations of the resistivity of various +pure metals were made by Fleming and Dewar, whose results are +set out in Table III.</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table II.</span>—<i>Electric Volume-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0° C., +or Resistance per Centimetre-cube in C.G.S. Units at 0° C.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Metal.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Volume-Resistivity.<br />at 0° C. in C.G.S.<br />Units</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Silver (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,502  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Silver (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,629  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,594  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,630<a name="FnAnchor_3" id="FnAnchor_3" href="#Footnote_3"><span class="sp">3</span></a>  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,052  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold (hard-drawn)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,090  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aluminium (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">3,006  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Zinc (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">5,621  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">9,035  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Iron (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">10,568  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nickel (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">12,429<a name="FnAnchor_4" id="FnAnchor_4" href="#Footnote_4"><span class="sp">4</span></a>  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Tin (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">13,178  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Lead (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">19,580  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Antimony (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">35,418  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Bismuth (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">130,872  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Mercury (liquid)</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">94,896<a name="FnAnchor_5" id="FnAnchor_5" href="#Footnote_5"><span class="sp">5</span></a>  </td></tr> +</table> + +<p><i>Resistivity of Mercury.</i>—The volume-resistivity of pure mercury +is a very important electric constant, and since 1880 many of the +most competent experimentalists have directed their attention to +the determination of its value. The experimental process has +usually been to fill a glass tube of known dimensions, having large +cup-like extensions at the ends, with pure mercury, and determine +the absolute resistance of this column of metal. For the practical +details of this method the following references may be consulted:—“The +Specific Resistance of Mercury,” Lord Rayleigh and Mrs Sidgwick, +<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1883, part i. p. 173, and R. T. Glazebrook, <i>Phil. +Mag.</i>, 1885, p. 20; “On the Specific Resistance of Mercury,” R. T. +Glazebrook and T. C. Fitzpatrick, <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1888, p. 179, or <i>Proc. +Roy. Soc.</i>, 1888, p. 44, or <i>Electrician</i>, 1888, 21, p. 538; “Recent +Determinations of the Absolute Resistance of Mercury,” R. T. Glazebrook, +<i>Electrician</i>, 1890, 25, pp. 543 and 588. Also see J. V. Jones, +“On the Determination of the Specific Resistance of Mercury in +Absolute Measure,” <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1891, A, p. 2. Table IV. gives +the values of the volume-resistivity of mercury as determined by +various observers, the constant being expressed (a) in terms of the +resistance in ohms of a column of mercury one millimetre in cross-section +and 100 centimetres in length, taken at 0° C.; and (b) in terms +of the length in centimetres of a column of mercury one square millimetre +in cross-section taken at 0° C. The result of all the most careful +determinations has been to show that the resistivity of pure +mercury at 0° C. is about 94,070 C.G.S. electromagnetic units of +resistance, and that a column of mercury 106.3 centimetres in length +having a cross-sectional area of one square millimetre would have a +resistance at 0° C. of one international ohm. These values have +accordingly been accepted as the official and recognized values for +the specific resistance of mercury, and the definition of the ohm. +The table also states the methods which have been adopted by the +different observers for obtaining the absolute value of the resistance +of a known column of mercury, or of a resistance coil afterwards +compared with a known column of mercury. A column of figures +is added showing the value in fractions of an international ohm of +the British Association Unit (B.A.U.), formerly supposed to represent +the true ohm. The real value of the B.A.U. is now taken as .9866 +of an international ohm.</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table III.</span>—<i>Electric Volume-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0° C., +or Resistance per Centimetre-cube at 0° C. in C.G.S. Units.</i> +(Fleming and Dewar, <i>Phil. Mag.</i>, September 1893.)</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Metal.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Resistance at 0° C.<br />per Centimetre-cube<br />in C.G.S. Units.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Mean Temperature<br />Coefficient between<br />0° C. and 100° C.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Silver (electrolytic and well annealed)<a name="FnAnchor_6" id="FnAnchor_6" href="#Footnote_6"><span class="sp">6</span></a></td> <td class="tcr rb">1,468  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00400</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper (electrolytic and well annealed)<a href="#Footnote_6"><span class="sp">6</span></a></td> <td class="tcr rb">1,561  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00428</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,197  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00377</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aluminium (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,665  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00435</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Magnesium (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">4,355  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00381</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Zinc</td> <td class="tcr rb">5,751  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00406</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nickel (electrolytic)<a href="#Footnote_6"><span class="sp">6</span></a></td> <td class="tcr rb">6,935  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00618</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Iron (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">9,065  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00625</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Cadmium</td> <td class="tcr rb">10,023  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00419</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Palladium</td> <td class="tcr rb">10,219  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00354</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum (annealed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">10,917  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.003669</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Tin (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">13,048  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00440</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Thallium (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">17,633  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00398</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Lead (pressed)</td> <td class="tcr rb">20,380  </td> <td class="tcl rb">  0.00411</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Bismuth (electrolytic)<a name="FnAnchor_7" id="FnAnchor_7" href="#Footnote_7"><span class="sp">7</span></a></td> <td class="tcr rb bb">110,000  </td> <td class="tcl rb bb">  0.00433</td></tr> +</table> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page857" id="page857"></a>857</span></p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table IV.</span>—<i>Determinations of the Absolute Value of the Volume-Resistivity of +Mercury and the Mercury Equivalent of the Ohm.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Observer.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Date.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Method.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Value of B.A.U.<br />in Ohms.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Value of 100<br />Centimetres of<br />Mercury in<br />Ohms.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Value of Ohm<br />in Centimetres<br />of Mercury.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Lord Rayleigh</td> <td class="tcc rb">1882</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rotating coil</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98651</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94133</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.31</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Lord Rayleigh</td> <td class="tcc rb">1883</td> <td class="tcl rb">Lorenz method</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98677</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.27</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">G. Wiedemann</td> <td class="tcc rb">1884</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rotation through 180°</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.19</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">E. E. N. Mascart</td> <td class="tcc rb">1884</td> <td class="tcl rb">Induced current</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98611</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94096</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.33</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H. A. Rowland</td> <td class="tcc rb">1887</td> <td class="tcl rb">Mean of several methods</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98644</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94071</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.32</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">F. Kohlrausch</td> <td class="tcc rb">1887</td> <td class="tcl rb">Damping of magnets</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98660</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94061</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.32</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">R. T. Glazebrook</td> <td class="tcc rb">1882/8</td> <td class="tcl rb">Induced currents</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98665</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94074</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.29</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Wuilleumeier</td> <td class="tcc rb">1890</td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">.98686</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94077</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.31</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Duncan and Wilkes</td> <td class="tcc rb">1890</td> <td class="tcl rb">Lorenz</td> <td class="tcc rb">.98634</td> <td class="tcc rb">.94067</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.34</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">J. V. Jones</td> <td class="tcc rb">1891</td> <td class="tcl rb">Lorenz</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.94067</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">106.31</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb ptb1"> </td> <td class="tcc rb ptb1"> </td> <td class="tcc ptb1">Mean value</td> <td class="tcc ptb1">.98653</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb ptb1"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Streker</td> <td class="tcc rb">1885</td> <td class="tcl rb">An absolute determination</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">.94056</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.32</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Hutchinson</td> <td class="tcc rb">1888</td> <td class="tcl rb">of resistance was not</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">.94074</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.30</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">E. Salvioni</td> <td class="tcc rb">1890</td> <td class="tcl rb">made. The value .98656</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">.94054</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.33</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">E. Salvioni</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">value .98656 has been used</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.94076</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">106.30</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb ptb1"> </td> <td class="tcc rb ptb1"> </td> <td class="tcc ptb1" colspan="2">Mean value</td> <td class="tcc rb ptb1">.94076</td> <td class="tcc rb ptb1">106.31</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H. F. Weber</td> <td class="tcc rb">1884</td> <td class="tcl rb">Induced current</td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2">Absolute measurements</td> <td class="tcc rb">105.37</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H. F. Weber</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rotating coil</td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2"> compared with German</td> <td class="tcc rb">106.16</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">A. Roiti</td> <td class="tcc rb">1884</td> <td class="tcl rb">Mean effect of induced current</td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2"> silver wire coils issued by</td> <td class="tcc rb">105.89</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">F. Himstedt</td> <td class="tcc rb">1885</td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2"> Siemens and Streker</td> <td class="tcc rb">105.98</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">F. E. Dorn</td> <td class="tcc rb">1889</td> <td class="tcl rb">Damping of a magnet</td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">106.24</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Wild</td> <td class="tcc rb">1883</td> <td class="tcl rb">Damping of a magnet</td> <td class="tcl rb" colspan="2"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">106.03</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">L. V. Lorenz</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">1885</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">Lorenz method</td> <td class="tcl rb bb" colspan="2"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">105.93</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>For a critical discussion of the methods which have +been adopted in the absolute determination of the +resistivity of mercury, and the value of the British +Association unit of resistance, the reader may be referred +to the <i>British Association Reports</i> for 1890 and +1892 (<i>Report of Electrical Standards Committee</i>), and to +the <i>Electrician</i>, 25, p. 456, and 29, p. 462. A discussion +of the relative value of the results obtained between +1882 and 1890 was given by R. T. Glazebrook +in a paper presented to the British Association at +Leeds, 1890.</p> + +<p><i>Resistivity of Copper.</i>—In connexion with electro-technical +work the determination of the conductivity +or resistivity values of annealed and hard-drawn copper +wire at standard temperatures is a very important +matter. Matthiessen devoted considerable attention +to this subject between the years 1860 and 1864 (see +<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1860, p. 150), and since that time much +additional work has been carried out. Matthiessen’s +value, known as <i>Matthiessen’s Standard</i>, for the mass-resistivity +of pure hard-drawn copper wire, is the +resistance of a wire of pure hard-drawn copper one +metre long and weighing one gramme, and this is +equal to 0.14493 international ohms at 0° C. For +many purposes it is more convenient to express temperature +in Fahrenheit degrees, and the recommendation +of the 1899 committee on copper conductors<a name="FnAnchor_8" id="FnAnchor_8" href="#Footnote_8"><span class="sp">8</span></a> is as +follows:—“Matthiessen’s standard for hard-drawn conductivity +commercial copper shall be considered to be +the resistance of a wire of pure hard-drawn copper one +metre long, weighing one gramme which at +60° F. is 0.153858 international ohms.” +Matthiessen also measured the mass-resistivity +of annealed copper, and found that its +conductivity is greater than that of hard-drawn +copper by about 2.25% to 2.5% +As annealed copper may vary considerably +in its state of annealing, and is always +somewhat hardened by bending and winding, +it is found in practice that the resistivity of +commercial annealed copper is about 1¼% +less than that of hard-drawn copper. The +standard now accepted for such copper, on +the recommendation of the 1899 Committee, +is a wire of pure annealed copper one metre +long, weighing one gramme, whose resistance +at 0° C. is 0.1421 international ohms, or at +60° F., 0.150822 international ohms. The +specific gravity of copper varies from about +8.89 to 8.95, and the standard value accepted +for high conductivity commercial copper is +8.912, corresponding to a weight of 555 lb +per cubic foot at 60° F. Hence the volume-resistivity +of pure annealed copper at 0° C. is +1.594 microhms per c.c., or 1594 C.G.S. units, +and that of pure hard-drawn copper at 0° C. is +1.626 microhms per c.c., or 1626 C.G.S. units. +Since Matthiessen’s researches, the most careful +scientific investigation on the conductivity +of copper is that of T. C. Fitzpatrick, +carried out in 1890. (<i>Brit. Assoc. Report</i>, 1890, +Appendix 3, p. 120.) Fitzpatrick confirmed +Matthiessen’s chief result, and obtained values +for the resistivity of hard-drawn copper which, +when corrected for temperature variation, are +in entire agreement with those of Matthiessen +at the same temperature.</p> +</div> + +<p>The volume resistivity of alloys is, generally +speaking, much higher than that of pure +metals. Table V. shows the volume resistivity +at 0° C. of a number of well-known +alloys, with their chemical composition.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table V.</span>—<i>Volume-Resistivity of Alloys of known Composition at 0° C. in C.G.S. +Units per Centimetre-cube. Mean Temperature Coefficients taken at 15° C.</i> +(Fleming and Dewar.)</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Alloys.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Resistivity<br />at 0° C.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Temperature<br />Coefficient<br />at 15° C.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Composition in per cents.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum-silver</td> <td class="tcr rb">31,582</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .000243</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pt 33%, Ag 66%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum-iridium</td> <td class="tcr rb">30,896</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .000822</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pt 80%, Ir 20%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinum-rhodium</td> <td class="tcr rb">21,142</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00143</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pt 90%, Rd 10%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gold-silver</td> <td class="tcr rb">6,280</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00124</td> <td class="tcl rb">Au 90%, Ag 10%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Manganese-steel</td> <td class="tcr rb">67,148</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00127</td> <td class="tcl rb">Mn 12%, Fe 78%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nickel-steel</td> <td class="tcr rb">29,452</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00201</td> <td class="tcl rb">Ni 4.35%, remaining percentage</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> </td> <td class="tcr rb"> </td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td> <td class="tcl rb"> chiefly iron, but uncertain</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">German silver</td> <td class="tcr rb">29,982</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .000273</td> <td class="tcl rb">Cu<span class="su">5</span>Zn<span class="su">3</span>Ni<span class="su">2</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Platinoid<a name="FnAnchor_9" id="FnAnchor_9" href="#Footnote_9"><span class="sp">9</span></a></td> <td class="tcr rb">41,731</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00031</td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Manganin</td> <td class="tcr rb">46,678</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .0000</td> <td class="tcl rb">Cu 84%, Mn 12%, Ni 4%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aluminium-silver</td> <td class="tcr rb">4,641</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00238</td> <td class="tcl rb">Al 94%, Ag 6%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aluminium-copper</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,904</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .00381</td> <td class="tcl rb">Al 94%, Cu 6%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper-aluminium</td> <td class="tcr rb">8,847</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .000897</td> <td class="tcl rb">Cu 97%, Al 3%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Copper-nickel-aluminium</td> <td class="tcr rb">14,912</td> <td class="tcl rb"> .000643</td> <td class="tcl rb">Cu 87%, Ni 6.5%, Al 6.5%</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Titanium-aluminium</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">3,887</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> .00290</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> </td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Generally speaking, an alloy having high resistivity has poor +mechanical qualities, that is to say, its tensile strength and ductility +are small. It is possible to form alloys having a resistivity as high +as 100 microhms per cubic centimetre; but, on the other hand, the +value of an alloy for electro-technical purposes is judged not merely +by its resistivity, but also by the degree to which its resistivity varies +with temperature, and by its capability of being easily drawn into +fine wire of not very small tensile strength. Some pure metals when +alloyed with a small proportion of another metal do not suffer much +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page858" id="page858"></a>858</span> +change in resistivity, but in other cases the resultant alloy has a +much higher resistivity. Thus an alloy of pure copper with 3% of +aluminium has a resistivity about 5½ times that of copper; but if +pure aluminium is alloyed with 6% of copper, the resistivity of the +product is not more than 20% greater than that of pure aluminium. +The presence of a very small proportion of a non-metallic element in +a metallic mass, such as oxygen, sulphur or phosphorus, has a very +great effect in increasing the resistivity. Certain metallic elements +also have the same power; thus platinoid has a resistivity 30% +greater than German silver, though it differs from it merely in +containing a trace of tungsten.</p> +</div> + +<p>The resistivity of non-metallic conductors is in all cases higher +than that of any pure metal. The resistivity of carbon, for +instance, in the forms of charcoal or carbonized organic material +and graphite, varies from 600 to 6000 microhms per cubic +centimetre, as shown in Table VI.:—</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table VI.</span>—<i>Electric Volume-Resistivity in Microhms per +Centimetre-cube of Various Forms of Carbon at 15° C.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Substance.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Resistivity.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Arc lamp carbon rod</td> <td class="tcl rb">8000</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Jablochkoff candle carbon</td> <td class="tcl rb">4000</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carré carbon</td> <td class="tcl rb">3400</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonized bamboo</td> <td class="tcl rb">6000</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonized parchmentized thread</td> <td class="tcl rb">4000 to 5000</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ordinary carbon filament from glow-lamp</td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> “treated” or flashed</td> <td class="tcl rb">2400 to 2500</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Deposited or secondary carbon</td> <td class="tcl rb"> 600 to  900</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Graphite</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> 400 to  500</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>The resistivity of liquids is, generally speaking, much higher +than that of any metals, metallic alloys or non-metallic conductors. +Thus fused lead chloride, one of the best conducting +liquids, has a resistivity in its fused condition of 0.376 ohm per +centimetre-cube, or 376,000 microhms per centimetre-cube, +whereas that of metallic alloys only in few cases exceeds 100 +microhms per centimetre-cube. The resistivity of solutions of +metallic salts also varies very largely with the proportion of the +diluent or solvent, and in some instances, as in the aqueous +solutions of mineral acids; there is a maximum conductivity +corresponding to a certain dilution. The resistivity of many +liquids, such as alcohol, ether, benzene and pure water, is so high, +in other words, their conductivity is so small, that they are +practically insulators, and the resistivity can only be appropriately +expressed in megohms per centimetre-cube.</p> + +<p>In Table VII. are given the names of a few of these badly-conducting +liquids, with the values of their volume-resistivity in +megohms per centimetre-cube:—</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table VII.</span>—<i>Electric Volume-Resistivity of Various Badly-Conducting +Liquids in Megohms per Centimetre-cube.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Substance.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Resistivity<br />in Megohms<br />per c.c.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Observer.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl alcohol</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.5</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pfeiffer.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl ether</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.175 to 3.760</td> <td class="tcl rb">W. Kohlrausch.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Benzene</td> <td class="tcc rb">4.700</td> <td class="tcl rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Absolutely pure water approximates probably to</td> <td class="tcc rb">25.0 at 18° C.</td> <td class="tcl rb">Value estimated by F. Kohlrausch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> </td> <td class="rb"> </td> <td class="tcl rb"> and A. Heydweiler.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">All very dilute aqueous salt solutions having a</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.00 at 18° C.</td> <td class="rb tcl">From results by F. Kohlrausch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> concentration of about 0.00001 of an equivalent</td> <td class="rb"> </td> <td class="rb tcl"> and others.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb"> gramme molecule<a name="FnAnchor_10" id="FnAnchor_10" href="#Footnote_10"><span class="sp">10</span></a> per litre approximate to</td> + <td class="rb bb"> </td> <td class="rb bb"> </td></tr> +</table> + +<p>The resistivity of all those substances which are generally +called dielectrics or insulators is also so high that it can only be +appropriately expressed in millions of megohms per centimetre-cube, +or in megohms per quadrant-cube, the quadrant being a +cube the side of which is 10<span class="sp">9</span> cms. (see Table VIII.).</p> + +<p class="tab pt05"><span class="sc">Table VIII.</span>—<i>Electric Volume-Resistivity of Dielectrics reckoned in + Millions of Megohms (Mega-megohms) per Centimetre-cube, and in + Megohms per Quadrant-cube, i.e. a Cube whose Side is</i> 10<span class="sp">9</span> <i>cms.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Substance.</td> + <td class="tccm allb" colspan="2">Resistivity.</td> + <td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Temperature<br />Cent.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Mega-megohms<br />per c.c.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Megohms per<br />Quadrant-cube.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Bohemian glass</td> <td class="tcr rb">61 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  .061</td> <td class="tcc rb">60°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Mica</td> <td class="tcr rb">84 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  .084</td> <td class="tcc rb">20°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Gutta-percha</td> <td class="tcr rb">450 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  .45</td> <td class="tcc rb">24°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Flint glass</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,020 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  1.02</td> <td class="tcc rb">60°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Glover’s vulcanized indiarubber</td> <td class="tcr rb">1,630 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  1.63</td> <td class="tcc rb">15°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Siemens’ ordinary pure vulcanized indiarubber</td> <td class="tcr rb">2,280 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  2.28</td> <td class="tcc rb">15°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Shellac</td> <td class="tcr rb">9,000 </td> <td class="tcl rb">  9.0</td> <td class="tcc rb">28°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Indiarubber</td> <td class="tcr rb">10,900 </td> <td class="tcl rb"> 10.9</td> <td class="tcc rb">24°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Siemens’ high-insulating fibrous material</td> <td class="tcr rb">11,900 </td> <td class="tcl rb"> 11.9</td> <td class="tcc rb">15°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Siemens’ special high-insulating indiarubber</td> <td class="tcr rb">16,170 </td> <td class="tcl rb"> 16.17</td> <td class="tcc rb">15°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Flint glass</td> <td class="tcr rb">20,000 </td> <td class="tcl rb"> 20.0</td> <td class="tcc rb">20°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ebonite</td> <td class="tcr rb">28,000 </td> <td class="tcl rb"> 28.</td> <td class="tcc rb">46°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Paraffin</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">34,000 </td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> 34.</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">46°</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Effects of Heat.—Temperature affects the resistivity of these +different classes of conductors in different ways. In all cases, so +far as is yet known, the resistivity of a pure metal is increased if +its temperature is raised, and decreased if the temperature is +lowered, so that if it could be brought to the absolute zero of +temperature (-273° C.) its resistivity would be reduced to a very +small fraction of its resistance at ordinary temperatures. With +metallic alloys, however, rise of temperature does not always +increase resistivity: it sometimes diminishes it, so that many +alloys are known which have a maximum resistivity corresponding +to a certain temperature, and at or near this point they vary very +little in resistance with temperature. Such alloys have, therefore, +a negative temperature-variation of resistance at and above +fixed temperatures. Prominent amongst these metallic compounds +are alloys of iron, manganese, nickel and copper, some +of which were discovered by Edward Weston, in the United +States. One well-known alloy of copper, manganese and nickel, +now called manganin, which was brought to the notice of +electricians by the careful investigations made at the Berlin +Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, is characterized by +having a zero temperature coefficient at or about a certain +temperature in the neighbourhood of 15° C. Hence within a +certain range of temperature on either side of this critical value +the resistivity of manganin is hardly affected at all by temperature. +Similar alloys can be produced from copper and ferro-manganese. +An alloy formed of 80% copper and 20% +manganese in an annealed condition has a nearly zero temperature-variation +of resistance between 20° C. and 100° C. In +the case of non-metals the action of temperature is generally +to diminish the resistivity as temperature rises, though this is not +universally so. The interesting observation has been recorded by +J. W. Howell, that “treated” carbon filaments and graphite are +substances which have a minimum resistance corresponding to a +certain temperature approaching red heat (<i>Electrician</i>, vol. +xxxviii. p. 835). At and beyond this temperature increased +heating appears to increase their resistivity; this phenomenon +may, however, be accompanied by a molecular change and not be +a true temperature variation. In the case of dielectric conductors +and of electrolytes, the action of rising temperature is to reduce +resistivity. Many of the so-called insulators, such as mica, +ebonite, indiarubber, and the insulating oils, paraffin, &c., +decrease in resistivity with great rapidity as the temperature +rises. With guttapercha a rise in temperature from 0° C. to +24° C. is sufficient to reduce the resistivity of one-twentieth part +of its value at 0° C., and the resistivity of flint glass at 140° C. +is only one-hundredth of what it is at 60° C.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>A definition may here be given of the meaning of the term <i>Temperature +Coefficient</i>. If, in the first place, we suppose that the resistivity +(ρ<span class="su">t</span>) at any temperature (t) is a simple linear function of the resistivity +(ρ<span class="su">0</span>) at 0° C., then we can write ρ<span class="su">t</span> = ρ<span class="su">0</span>(1 + αt), or α = (ρ<span class="su">t</span> − ρ<span class="su">0</span>)/ρ<span class="su">0</span>t.</p> + +<p>The quantity α is then called the temperature-coefficient, and its +reciprocal is the temperature at which the resistivity would become +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page859" id="page859"></a>859</span> +zero. By an extension of this notion we can call the quantity +dρ/ρdt the temperature coefficient corresponding to any temperature +t at which the resistivity is ρ. In all cases the relation between the +resistivity of a substance and the temperature is best set out in the +form of a curve called a temperature-resistance curve. If a series of +such curves are drawn for various pure metals, temperature being +taken as abscissa and resistance as ordinate, and if the temperature +range extends from the absolute zero of temperature upwards, then +it is found that these temperature-resistance lines are curved lines +having their convexity either upwards or downwards. In other +words, the second differential coefficient of resistance with respect +to temperature is either a positive or negative quantity. An extensive +series of observations concerning the form of the resistivity +curves for various pure metals over a range of temperature extending +from -200° C. to +200° C. was carried out in 1892 and 1893 by +Fleming and Dewar (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> Oct. 1892 and Sept. 1893). +The resistance observations were taken with resistance coils constructed +with wires of various metals obtained in a state of great +chemical purity. The lengths and mean diameters of the wires were +carefully measured, and their resistance was then taken at certain +known temperatures obtained by immersing the coils in boiling +aniline, boiling water, melting ice, melting carbonic acid in ether, +and boiling liquid oxygen, the temperatures thus given being ++184°.5 C., +100° C., 0° C., -78°.2 C. and -182°.5 C. The +resistivities of the various metals were then calculated and set out +in terms of the temperature. From these data a chart was prepared +showing the temperature-resistance curves of these metals +throughout a range of 400 degrees. The exact form of these curves +through the region of temperature lying between -200° C. and +-273° C. is not yet known. As shown on the chart, the curves +evidently do not converge to precisely the same point. It is, however, +much less probable that the resistance of any metal should +vanish at a temperature above the absolute zero than at the absolute +zero itself, and the precise path of these curves at their lower ends +cannot be delineated until means are found for fixing independently +the temperature of some regions in which the resistance of metallic +wires can be measured. Sir J. Dewar subsequently showed that for +certain pure metals it is clear that the resistance would not vanish +at the absolute zero but would be reduced to a finite but small value +(see “Electric Resistance Thermometry at the Temperature of +Boiling Hydrogen,” <i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 1904, 73, p. 244).</p> + +<p>The resistivity curves of the magnetic metals are also remarkable +for the change of curvature they exhibit at the magnetic critical +temperature. Thus J. Hopkinson and D. K. Morris (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> +September 1897, p. 213) observed the remarkable alteration that +takes place in the iron resistance temperature curve in the neighbourhood +of 780° C. At that temperature the direction of the +curvature of the curve changes so that it becomes convex upwards +instead of convex downwards, and in addition the value of the +temperature coefficient undergoes a great reduction. The mean +temperature coefficient of iron in the neighbourhood of 0° C. is +0.0057; at 765° C. it rises to a maximum value 0.0204; but at +1000° C. it falls again to a lower value, 0.00244. A similar rise to +a maximum value and subsequent fall are also noted in the case of +the specific heat of iron. The changes in the curvature of the resistivity +curves are undoubtedly connected with the molecular changes +that occur in the magnetic metals at their critical temperatures.</p> + +<p>A fact of considerable interest in connexion with resistivity is the +influence exerted by a strong magnetic field in the case of some +metals, notably bismuth. It was discovered by A. Righi and confirmed +by S. A. Leduc (<i>Journ. de Phys.</i> 1886, 5, p. 116, and 1887, +6, p. 189) that if a pure bismuth wire is placed in a magnetic field +transversely to the direction of the magnetic field, its resistance is +considerably increased. This increase is greatly affected by the +temperature of the metal (Dewar and Fleming, <i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 1897, +60, p. 427). The temperature coefficient of pure copper is an important +constant, and its value as determined by Messrs Clark, +Forde and Taylor in terms of Fahrenheit temperature is</p> + +<p class="center1">ρ<span class="su">t</span> = ρ<span class="su">32</span> {1 + 0.0023708(t − 32) + 0.0000034548(t − 32)²}.</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Time Effects.</i>—In the case of dielectric conductors, commonly +called insulators, such as indiarubber, guttapercha, glass and +mica, the electric resistivity is not only a function of the temperature +but also of the time during which the electromotive +force employed to measure it is imposed. Thus if an indiarubber-covered +cable is immersed in water and the resistance of the +dielectric between the copper conductor and the water measured +by ascertaining the current which can be caused to flow through +it by an electromotive force, this current is found to vary very +rapidly with the time during which the electromotive force is +applied. Apart from the small initial effect due to the electrostatic +capacity of the cable, the application of an electromotive +force to the dielectric produces a current through it which +rapidly falls in value, as if the electric resistance of the dielectric +were increasing. The current, however, does not fall continuously +but tends to a limiting value, and it appears that if the +electromotive force is kept applied to the cable for a prolonged +time, a small and nearly constant current will ultimately be +found flowing through it. It is customary in electro-technical +work to consider the resistivity of the dielectric as the value it has +after the electromotive force has been applied for one minute, the +standard temperature being 75° F. This, however, is a purely +conventional proceeding, and the number so obtained does not +necessarily represent the true or ohmic resistance of the dielectric. +If the electromotive force is increased, in the case of a large +number of ordinary dielectrics the apparent resistance at the end +of one minute’s electrification decreases as the electromotive +force increases.</p> + +<p><i>Practical Standards.</i>—The practical measurement of resistivity +involves many processes and instruments (see <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Wheatstone’s +Bridge</a></span> and <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Ohmmeter</a></span>). Broadly speaking, the +processes are divided into <i>Comparison Methods</i> and <i>Absolute +Methods</i>. In the former a comparison is effected between the +resistance of a material in a known form and some standard +resistance. In the <i>Absolute Methods</i> the resistivity is determined +without reference to any other substance, but with reference +only to the fundamental standards of length, mass and time. +Immense labour has been expended in investigations concerned +with the production of a standard of resistance and its evaluation +in absolute measure. In some cases the absolute standard is +constructed by filling a carefully-calibrated tube of glass with +mercury, in order to realize in a material form the official definition +of the ohm; in this manner most of the principal national +physical laboratories have been provided with standard mercury +ohms. (For a full description of the standard mercury ohm of +the Berlin Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, see the +<i>Electrician</i>, xxxvii. 569.) For practical purposes it is more convenient +to employ a standard of resistance made of wire.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>Opinion is not yet perfectly settled on the question whether a +wire made of any alloy can be considered to be a perfectly unalterable +standard of resistance, but experience has shown that a platinum +silver alloy (66% silver, 33% platinum), and also the alloy called +manganin, seem to possess the qualities of permanence essential for +a wire-resistance standard. A comparison made in 1892 and 1894 +of all the manganin wire copies of the ohm made at the Reichsanstalt +in Berlin, showed that these standards had remained constant for +two years to within one or two parts in 100,000. It appears, however, +that in order that manganin may remain constant in resistivity when +used in the manufacture of a resistance coil, it is necessary that the +alloy should be <i>aged</i> by heating it to a temperature of 140° C. for ten +hours; and to prevent subsequent changes in resistivity, solders +containing zinc must be avoided, and a silver solder containing 75% +of silver employed in soldering the manganin wire to its connexions.</p> +</div> + +<p>The authorities of the Berlin Reichsanstalt have devoted +considerable attention to the question of the best form for a wire +standard of electric resistance. In that now adopted the resistance +wire is carefully insulated and wound on a brass cylinder, +being doubled on itself to annul inductance as much as possible. +In the coil two wires are wound on in parallel, one being much +finer than the other, and the final adjustment of the coil to an +exact value is made by shortening the finer of the two. A +standard of resistance for use in a laboratory now generally +consists of a wire of manganin or platinum-silver carefully +insulated and enclosed in a brass case. Thick copper rods are +connected to the terminals of the wire in the interior of the case, +and brought to the outside, being carefully insulated at the same +time from one another and from the case. The coil so constructed +can be placed under water or paraffin oil, the temperature of +which can be exactly observed during the process of taking a +resistance measurement. Equalization of the temperature of +the surrounding medium is effected by the employment of a +stirrer, worked by hand or by a small electric motor. The +construction of a standard of electrical resistance consisting of +mercury in a glass tube is an operation requiring considerable +precautions, and only to be undertaken by those experienced +in the matter. Opinions are divided on the question whether +greater permanence in resistance can be secured by mercury-in-glass +standards of resistance or by wire standards, but the latter +are at least more portable and less fragile.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>A full description of the construction of a standard wire-resistance +coil on the plan adopted by the Berlin Physikalisch-Technische +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page860" id="page860"></a>860</span> +Reichsanstalt is given in the Report of the British Association Committee +on Electrical Standards, presented at the Edinburgh Meeting +in 1892. For the design and construction of standards of electric +resistances adapted for employment in the comparison and measurement +of very low or very high resistances, the reader may be referred +to standard treatises on electric measurements.</p> + +<p><span class="sc">Bibliography.</span>—See also J. A. Fleming, <i>A Handbook for the +Electrical Laboratory and Testing Room</i>, vol. i. (London, 1901); +<i>Reports of the British Association Committee on Electrical Standards</i>, +edited by Fleeming Jenkin (London, 1873); A. Matthiessen and C. +Vogt, “On the Influence of Temperature on the Conducting Power +of Alloys,” <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1864, 154, p. 167, and <i>Phil. Mag.</i>, 1865, +29, p. 363; A. Matthiessen and M. Holtzmann, “On the Effect of +the Presence of Metals and Metalloids upon the Electric Conducting +Power of Pure Copper,” <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1860, 150, p. 85; T. C. Fitzpatrick, +“On the Specific Resistance of Copper,” <i>Brit. Assoc. Report</i>, +1890, p. 120, or <i>Electrician</i>, 1890, 25, p. 608; R. Appleyard, <i>The +Conductometer and Electrical Conductivity</i>; Clark, Forde and Taylor, +<i>Temperature Coefficients of Copper</i> (London, 1901).</p> +</div> +<div class="author">(J. A. F.)</div> + +<p class="center1">II. <span class="sc">Conduction in Liquids</span></p> + +<p>Through liquid metals, such as mercury at ordinary temperatures +and other metals at temperatures above their melting +points, the electric current flows as in solid metals without +changing the state of the conductor, except in so far as heat is +developed by the electric resistance. But another class of liquid +conductors exists, and in them the phenomena are quite +different. The conductivity of fused salts, and of solutions of +salts and acids, although less than that of metals, is very great +compared with the traces of conductivity found in so-called non-conductors. +In fused salts and conducting solutions the passage +of the current is always accompanied by definite chemical +changes; the substance of the conductor or electrolyte is +decomposed, and the products of the decomposition appear at the +electrodes, <i>i.e.</i> the metallic plates by means of which the current +is led into and out of the solution. The chemical phenomena are +considered in the article <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electrolysis</a></span>; we are here concerned +solely with the mechanism of this <i>electrolytic</i> conduction of the +current.</p> + +<p>To explain the appearance of the products of decomposition at +the electrodes only, while the intervening solution is unaltered, +we suppose that, under the action of the electric forces, the +opposite parts of the electrolyte move in opposite directions +through the liquid. These opposite parts, named ions by +Faraday, must therefore be associated with electric charges, and +it is the convective movement of the opposite streams of ions +carrying their charges with them that, on this view, constitutes +the electric current.</p> + +<p>In metallic conduction it is found that the current is proportional +to the applied electromotive force—a relation known by +the name of Ohm’s law. If we place in a circuit with a small +electromotive force an electrolytic cell consisting of two platinum +electrodes and a solution, the initial current soon dies away, and +we shall find that a certain minimum electromotive force must be +applied to the circuit before any considerable permanent current +passes. The chemical changes which are initiated on the surfaces +of the electrodes set up a reverse electromotive force of polarization, +and, until this is overcome, only a minute current, probably +due to the slow but steady removal of the products of decomposition +from the electrodes by a process of diffusion, will pass +through the cell. Thus it is evident that, considering the +electrolytic cell as a whole, the passage of the current through it +cannot conform to Ohm’s law. But the polarization is due to +chemical changes, which are confined to the surfaces of the +electrodes; and it is necessary to inquire whether, if the polarization +at the electrodes be eliminated, the passage of the current +through the bulk of the solution itself is proportional to the +electromotive force actually applied to that solution. Rough +experiment shows that the current is proportional to the excess of +the electromotive force over a constant value, and thus verifies +the law approximately, the constant electromotive force to be +overcome being a measure of the polarization. A more satisfactory +examination of the question was made by F. Kohlrausch +in the years 1873 to 1876. Ohm’s law states that the current C +is proportional to the electromotive force E, or C = kR, where k is +a constant called the conductivity of the circuit. The equation +may also be written as C = E/R, where R is a constant, the +reciprocal of k, known as the resistance of the circuit. The +essence of the law is the proportionality between C and E, which +means that the ratio E/C is a constant. But E/C = R, and thus +the law may be tested by examining the constancy of the +measured resistance of a conductor when different currents are +passing through it. In this way Ohm’s law has been confirmed in +the case of metallic conduction to a very high degree of accuracy. +A similar principle was applied by Kohlrausch to the case of +electrolytes, and he was the first to show that an electrolyte +possesses a definite resistance which has a constant value when +measured with different currents and by different experimental +methods.</p> + +<p><i>Measurement of the Resistance of Electrolytes.</i>—There are two +effects of the passage of an electric current which prevent the +possibility of measuring electrolytic resistance by the ordinary +methods with the direct currents which are used in the case of +metals. The products of the chemical decomposition of the +electrolyte appear at the electrodes and set up the opposing +electromotive force of polarization, and unequal dilution of the +solution may occur in the neighbourhood of the two electrodes. +The chemical and electrolytic aspects of these phenomena are +treated in the article <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electrolysis</a></span>, but from our present point +of view also it is evident that they are again of fundamental +importance. The polarization at the surface of the electrodes +will set up an opposing electromotive force, and the unequal +dilution of the solution will turn the electrolyte into a concentration +cell and produce a subsidiary electromotive force either in +the same direction as that applied or in the reverse according +as the anode or the cathode solution becomes the more dilute. +Both effects thus involve internal electromotive forces, and +prevent the application of Ohm’s law to the electrolytic cell as a +whole. But the existence of a definite measurable resistance as a +characteristic property of the system depends on the conformity +of the system to Ohm’s law, and it is therefore necessary to +eliminate both these effects before attempting to measure the +resistance.</p> + +<p>The usual and most satisfactory method of measuring the +resistance of electrolytes consists in eliminating the effects of +polarization by the use of alternating currents, that is, currents +that are reversed in direction many times a second.<a name="FnAnchor_11" id="FnAnchor_11" href="#Footnote_11"><span class="sp">11</span></a> The +chemical action produced by the first current is thus reversed by +the second current in the opposite direction, and the polarization +caused by the first current on the surface of the electrodes is +destroyed before it rises to an appreciable value. The polarization +is also diminished in another way. The electromotive force +of polarization is due to the deposition of films of the products of +chemical decomposition on the surface of the electrodes, and +only reaches its full value when a continuous film is formed. If +the current be stopped before such a film is completed, the +reverse electromotive force is less than its full value. A given +current flowing for a given time deposits a definite amount of +substance on the electrodes, and therefore the amount per unit +area is inversely proportional to the area of the electrodes—to +the area of contact, that is, between the electrode and the liquid. +Thus, by increasing the area of the electrodes, the polarization due +to a given current is decreased. Now the area of free surface of a +platinum plate can be increased enormously by coating the plate +with platinum black, which is metallic platinum in a spongy +state, and with such a plate as electrode the effects of polarization +are diminished to a very marked extent. The coating is effected +by passing an electric current first one way and then the other +between two platinum plates immersed in a 3% solution of +platinum chloride to which a trace of lead acetate is sometimes +added. The platinized plates thus obtained are quite satisfactory +for the investigation of strong solutions. They have the power, +however, of absorbing a certain amount of salt from the solutions +and of giving it up again when water or more dilute solution is +placed in contact with them. The measurement of very dilute +solutions is thus made difficult, but, if the plates be heated to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page861" id="page861"></a>861</span> +redness after being platinized, a grey surface is obtained which +possesses sufficient area for use with dilute solutions and yet does +not absorb an appreciable quantity of salt.</p> + +<p>Any convenient source of alternating current may be used. +The currents from the secondary circuit of a small induction coil +are satisfactory, or the currents of an alternating electric light +supply may be transformed down to an electromotive force of one +or two volts. With such currents it is necessary to consider the +effects of self-induction in the circuit and of electrostatic capacity. +In balancing the resistance of the electrolyte, resistance coils may +be used in which self-induction and the capacity are reduced +to a minimum by winding the wire of the coil backwards and +forwards in alternate layers.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 290px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:237px; height:185px" src="images/img861a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 1.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>With these arrangements the usual method of measuring +resistance by means of Wheatstone’s bridge may be adapted to +the case of electrolytes. With alternating currents, however, +it is impossible to use a galvanometer in the usual way. The +galvanometer was therefore replaced by Kohlrausch by a +telephone, which gives a sound +when an alternating current +passes through it. The most common +plan of the apparatus is +shown diagrammatically in fig. 1. +The electrolytic cell and a resistance +box form two arms of the +bridge, and the sliding contact is +moved along the metre wire which +forms the other two arms till no +sound is heard in the telephone. +The resistance of the electrolyte is to that of the box as that +of the right-hand end of the wire is to that of the left-hand +end. A more accurate method of using alternating currents, +and one more pleasant to use, gets rid of the telephone +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1900, 194, p. 321). The current from one or two +voltaic cells is led to an ebonite drum turned by a motor or +a hand-wheel and cord. On the drum are fixed brass strips +with wire brushes touching them in such a manner that the +current from the brushes is reversed several times in each +revolution of the drum. The wires from the brushes are connected +with the Wheatstone’s bridge. A moving coil galvanometer +is used as indicator, its connexions being reversed in time +with those of the battery by a slightly narrower set of brass +strips fixed on the other end of the ebonite commutator. Thus +any residual current through the galvanometer is direct and not +alternating. The high moment of inertia of the coil makes the +period of swing slow compared with the period of alternation of +the current, and the slight periodic disturbances are thus prevented +from affecting the galvanometer. When the measured +resistance is not altered by increasing the speed of the commutator +or changing the ratio of the arms of the bridge, the +disturbing effects may be considered to be eliminated.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 310px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1" colspan="2"><img style="width:264px; height:117px" src="images/img861b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 2. </span></td> + <td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 3. </span></td></tr></table> + +<p>The form of vessel chosen to contain the electrolyte depends +on the order of resistance to be measured. For dilute solutions +the shape of cell shown in +fig. 2 will be found convenient, +while for more concentrated +solutions, that indicated in fig. +3 is suitable. The absolute +resistances of certain solutions +have been determined by +Kohlrausch by comparison +with mercury, and, by using one of these solutions in any +cell, the constant of that cell may be found once for all. +From the observed resistance of any given solution in the +cell the resistance of a centimetre cube—the so-called specific +resistance—may be calculated. The reciprocal of this, or +the conductivity, is a more generally useful constant; +it is conveniently expressed in terms of a unit equal to the +reciprocal of an ohm. Thus Kohlrausch found that a solution of +potassium chloride, containing one-tenth of a gram equivalent +(7.46 grams) per litre, has at 18° C. a specific resistance of 89.37 +ohms per centimetre cube, or a conductivity of 1.119×10<span class="sp">-2</span> +mhos or 1.119×10<span class="sp">-11</span> C.G.S. units. As the temperature variation +of conductivity is large, usually about 2% per degree, it is +necessary to place the resistance cell in a paraffin or water bath, +and to observe its temperature with some accuracy.</p> + +<p>Another way of eliminating the effects of polarization and of +dilution has been used by W. Stroud and J. B. Henderson +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, 1897 [5], 43, p. 19). Two of the arms of a Wheatstone’s +bridge are composed of narrow tubes filled with the +solution, the tubes being of equal diameter but of different +length. The other two arms are made of coils of wire of equal +resistance, and metallic resistance is added to the shorter tube +till the bridge is balanced. Direct currents of somewhat high +electromotive force are used to work the bridge. Equal currents +then flow through the two tubes; the effects of polarization and +dilution must be the same in each, and the resistance added to the +shorter tube must be equal to the resistance of a column of liquid +the length of which is equal to the difference in length of the two +tubes.</p> + +<p>A somewhat different principle was adopted by E. Bouty in +1884. If a current be passed through two resistances in series by +means of an applied electromotive force, the electric potential +falls from one end of the resistances to the other, and, if we apply +Ohm’s law to each resistance in succession, we see that, since for +each of them E = CR, and C the current is the same through both, +E the electromotive force or fall of potential between the ends of +each resistance must be proportional to the resistance between +them. Thus by measuring the potential difference between the +ends of the two resistances successively, we may compare their +resistances. If, on the other hand, we can measure the potential +difference in some known units, and similarly measure the current +flowing, we can determine the resistance of a single electrolyte. +The details of the apparatus may vary, but its principle is +illustrated in the following description. A narrow glass tube is +fixed horizontally into side openings in two glass vessels, and an +electric current passed through it by means of platinum electrodes +and a battery of considerable electromotive force. In this way a +steady fall of electric potential is set up along the length of the +tube. To measure the potential difference between the ends of +the tube, tapping electrodes are constructed, <i>e.g.</i> by placing zinc +rods in vessels with zinc sulphate solution and connecting these +vessels (by means of thin siphon tubes also filled with solution) +with the vessels at the ends of the long tube which contains the +electrolyte to be examined. Whatever be the contact potential +difference between zinc and its solution, it is the same at both +ends, and thus the potential difference between the zinc rods is +equal to that between the liquid at the two ends of the tube. +This potential difference may be measured without passing any +appreciable current through the tapping electrodes, and thus the +resistance of the liquid deduced.</p> + +<p><i>Equivalent Conductivity of Solutions.</i>—As is the case in the +other properties of solutions, the phenomena are much more +simple when the concentration is small than when it is great, and +a study of dilute solutions is therefore the best way of getting an +insight into the essential principles of the subject. The foundation +of our knowledge was laid by Kohlrausch when he had developed +the method of measuring electrolyte resistance described above. +He expressed his results in terms of “equivalent conductivity,” +that is, the conductivity (k) of the solution divided by the number +(m) of gram-equivalents of electrolyte per litre. He finds that, as +the concentration diminishes, the value of k/m approaches a +limit, and eventually becomes constant, that is to say, at great +dilution the conductivity is proportional to the concentration. +Kohlrausch first prepared very pure water by repeated distillation +and found that its resistance continually increased as the process +of purification proceeded. The conductivity of the water, and of +the slight impurities which must always remain, was subtracted +from that of the solution made with it, and the result, divided +by m, gave the equivalent conductivity of the substance dissolved. +This procedure appears justifiable, for as long as conductivity is +proportional to concentration it is evident that each part of the +dissolved matter produces its own independent effect, so that the +total conductivity is the sum of the conductivities of the parts; +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page862" id="page862"></a>862</span> +when this ceases to hold, the concentration of the solution has in +general become so great that the conductivity of the solvent may +be neglected. The general result of these experiments can be +represented graphically by plotting <i>k/m</i> as ordinates and <span class="sp">3</span>√<span class="ov">m</span> +as abscissae, <span class="sp">3</span>√<span class="ov">m</span> being a number proportional to the reciprocal +of the average distance between the molecules, to which it seems +likely that the molecular conductivity may be related. The +general types of curve for a simple neutral salt like potassium or +sodium chloride and for a caustic alkali or acid are shown in fig. 4. +The curve for the neutral salt comes to a limiting value; that for +the acid attains a maximum at a certain very small concentration, +and falls again when the dilution +is carried farther. It has usually +been considered that this destruction +of conductivity is due to +chemical action between the acid +and the residual impurities in the +water. At such great dilution these +impurities are present in quantities +comparable with the amount of acid +which they convert into a less +highly conducting neutral salt. In +the case of acids, then, the maximum +must be taken as the limiting +value. The decrease in equivalent conductivity at great dilution +is, however, so constant that this explanation seems insufficient. +The true cause of the phenomenon may perhaps be connected +with the fact that the bodies in which it occurs, acids and +alkalis, contain the ions, hydrogen in the one case, hydroxyl in +the other, which are present in the solvent, water, and have, +perhaps because of this relation, velocities higher than those of any +other ions. The values of the molecular conductivities of all +neutral salts are, at great dilution, of the same order of magnitude, +while those of acids at their maxima are about three times as +large. The influence of increasing concentration is greater in the +case of salts containing divalent ions, and greatest of all in such +cases as solutions of ammonia and acetic acid, which are substances +of very low conductivity.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 275px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:225px; height:217px" src="images/img862.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 4.</span></td></tr></table> + + +<p><i>Theory of Moving Ions.</i>—Kohlrausch found that, when the +polarization at the electrodes was eliminated, the resistance of a +solution was constant however determined, and thus established +Ohm’s Law for electrolytes. The law was confirmed in the case +of strong currents by G. F. Fitzgerald and F. T. Trouton (<i>B.A. +Report</i>, 1886, p. 312). Now, Ohm’s Law implies that no work is +done by the current in overcoming reversible electromotive +forces such as those of polarization. Thus the molecular interchange +of ions, which must occur in order that the products may +be able to work their way through the liquid and appear at the +electrodes, continues throughout the solution whether a current is +flowing or not. The influence of the current on the ions is +merely directive, and, when it flows, streams of electrified ions +travel in opposite directions, and, if the applied electromotive +force is enough to overcome the local polarization, give up their +charges to the electrodes. We may therefore represent the facts +by considering the process of electrolysis to be a kind of convection. +Faraday’s classical experiments proved that when a current +flows through an electrolyte the quantity of substance liberated +at each electrode is proportional to its chemical equivalent +weight, and to the total amount of electricity passed. Accurate +determinations have since shown that the mass of an ion deposited +by one electromagnetic unit of electricity, <i>i.e.</i> its electro-chemical +equivalent, is 1.036×10<span class="sp">-4</span>×its chemical equivalent +weight. Thus the amount of electricity associated with one +gram-equivalent of any ion is 10<span class="sp">4</span>/1.036 = 9653 units. Each +monovalent ion must therefore be associated with a certain +definite charge, which we may take to be a natural unit of +electricity; a divalent ion carries two such units, and so on. +A cation, <i>i.e.</i> an ion giving up its charge at the cathode, as the +electrode at which the current leaves the solution is called, carries +a positive charge of electricity; an anion, travelling in the +opposite direction, carries a negative charge. It will now be seen +that the quantity of electricity flowing per second, <i>i.e.</i> the current +through the solution, depends on (1) the number of the ions +concerned, (2) the charge on each ion, and (3) the velocity with +which the ions travel past each other. Now, the number of ions +is given by the concentration of the solution, for even if all the +ions are not actively engaged in carrying the current at the same +instant, they must, on any dynamical idea of chemical equilibrium, +be all active in turn. The charge on each, as we have +seen, can be expressed in absolute units, and therefore the +velocity with which they move past each other can be calculated. +This was first done by Kohlrausch (<i>Göttingen Nachrichten</i>, 1876, +p. 213, and <i>Das Leitvermögen der Elektrolyte</i>, Leipzig, 1898) +about 1879.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>In order to develop Kohlrausch’s theory, let us take, as an example, +the case of an aqueous solution of potassium chloride, of concentration +n gram-equivalents per cubic centimetre. There will then +be n gram-equivalents of potassium ions and the same number of +chlorine ions in this volume. Let us suppose that on each gram-equivalent +of potassium there reside +e units of electricity, and on +each gram-equivalent of chlorine ions -e units. If u denotes the +average velocity of the potassium ion, the positive charge carried +per second across unit area normal to the flow is n e u. Similarly, if +v be the average velocity of the chlorine ions, the negative charge +carried in the opposite direction is n e v. But positive electricity +moving in one direction is equivalent to negative electricity moving +in the other, so that, before changes in concentration sensibly supervene, +the total current, C, is ne(u + v). Now let us consider the +amounts of potassium and chlorine liberated at the electrodes by +this current. At the cathode, if the chlorine ions were at rest, the +excess of potassium ions would be simply those arriving in one second, +namely, nu. But since the chlorine ions move also, a further separation +occurs, and nv potassium ions are left without partners. The +total number of gram-equivalents liberated is therefore n(u + v). +By Faraday’s law, the number of grams liberated is equal to the +product of the current and the electro-chemical equivalent of the +ion; the number of gram-equivalents therefore must be equal to +ηC, where η denotes the electro-chemical equivalent of hydrogen in +C.G.S. units. Thus we get</p> + +<p class="center1">n(u + v) = ηC = ηne(u + v),</p> + +<p class="noind">and it follows that the charge, e, on 1 gram-equivalent of each kind +of ion is equal to 1/η. We know that Ohm’s Law holds good for +electrolytes, so that the current C is also given by k·dP/dx, where +k denotes the conductivity of the solution, and dP/dx the potential +gradient, <i>i.e.</i> the change in potential per unit length along the lines of +current flow. Thus</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td>n</td> <td rowspan="2">(u + v) = kdP/dx;</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">η</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">therefore</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">u + v = η</td> + <td>k</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dP</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">n</td> <td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Now η is 1.036×10<span class="sp">-4</span>, and the concentration of a solution is usually +expressed in terms of the number, m, of gram-equivalents per litre +instead of per cubic centimetre. Therefore</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">u + v = 1.036×10<span class="sp">-1</span></td> + <td>k</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dP</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">m</td> <td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p>When the potential gradient is one volt (10<span class="sp">8</span> C.G.S. units) per +centimetre this becomes</p> + +<p class="center1">u + v = 1.036×10<span class="sp">-7</span>×k/m.</p> + +<p>Thus by measuring the value of k/m, which is known as the +equivalent conductivity of the solution, we can find u + v, the +velocity of the ions relative to each other. For instance, the equivalent +conductivity of a solution of potassium chloride containing one-tenth +of a gram-equivalent per litre is 1119×10<span class="sp">-13</span> C.G.S. units at +18° C. Therefore</p> + +<p class="center1">u + v = 1.036×10<span class="sp">7</span>×1119×10<span class="sp">-13</span> += 1.159×10<span class="sp">-3</span> = 0.001159 cm. per sec.</p> + +<p>In order to obtain the absolute velocities u and v, we must find +some other relation between them. Let us resolve u into ½(u + v) +in one direction, say to the right, and ½(u − v) to the left. Similarly +v can be resolved into ½(v + u) to the left and ½(v − u) to the right. +On pairing these velocities we have a combined movement of the +ions to the right, with a speed of ½(u − v) and a drift right and left, +past each other, each ion travelling with a speed of ½(u + v), constituting +the electrolytic separation. If u is greater than v, the combined +movement involves a concentration of salt at the cathode, and a +corresponding dilution at the anode, and <i>vice versa</i>. The rate at +which salt is electrolysed, and thus removed from the solution at +each electrode, is ½(u + v). Thus the total loss of salt at the cathode +is ½(u + v) − ½(u − v) or v, and at the anode, ½(v + u) − ½(v − u), or u. +Therefore, as is explained in the article <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electrolysis</a></span>, by measuring +the dilution of the liquid round the electrodes when a current passed, +W. Hittorf (<i>Pogg. Ann.</i>, 1853-1859, 89, p. 177; 98, p. 1; 103, p. 1; 106, +pp. 337 and 513) was able to deduce the ratio of the two velocities, +for simple salts when no complex ions are present, and many further +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page863" id="page863"></a>863</span> +experiments have been made on the subject (see <i>Das Leitvermögen +der Elektrolyte</i>).</p> + +<p>By combining the results thus obtained with the sum of the +velocities, as determined from the conductivities, Kohlrausch calculated +the absolute velocities of different ions under stated conditions. +Thus, in the case of the solution of potassium chloride +considered above, Hittorf’s experiments show us that the ratio of +the velocity of the anion to that of the cation in this solution is +.51 : .49. The absolute velocity of the potassium ion under unit +potential gradient is therefore 0.000567 cm. per sec., and that of +the chlorine ion 0.000592 cm. per sec. Similar calculations can +be made for solutions of other concentrations, and of different +substances.</p> +</div> + +<p>Table IX. shows Kohlrausch’s values for the ionic velocities of +three chlorides of alkali metals at 18° C, calculated for a potential +gradient of 1 volt per cm.; the numbers are in terms of a unit +equal to 10<span class="sp">-6</span> cm. per sec.:—</p> + +<p class="center1"><span class="sc">Table IX.</span></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb"> </td> + <td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">KCl</td> <td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">NaCl</td> <td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">LiCl</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">m</td> + <td class="tcc bb">u + v</td> <td class="tcc bb">u</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">v</td> + <td class="tcc bb">u + v</td> <td class="tcc bb">u</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">v</td> + <td class="tcc bb">u + v</td> <td class="tcc bb">u</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">v</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> 0</td> <td class="tcr">1350</td> <td class="tcr">660</td> <td class="tcr rb">690</td> <td class="tcr">1140</td> <td class="tcr">450</td> <td class="tcr rb">690</td> <td class="tcr">1050</td> <td class="tcr">360</td> <td class="tcr rb">690</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> 0.0001</td> <td class="tcr">1335</td> <td class="tcr">654</td> <td class="tcr rb">681</td> <td class="tcr">1129</td> <td class="tcr">448</td> <td class="tcr rb">681</td> <td class="tcr">1037</td> <td class="tcr">356</td> <td class="tcr rb">681</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> .001</td> <td class="tcr">1313</td> <td class="tcr">643</td> <td class="tcr rb">670</td> <td class="tcr">1110</td> <td class="tcr">440</td> <td class="tcr rb">670</td> <td class="tcr">1013</td> <td class="tcr">343</td> <td class="tcr rb">670</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> .01</td> <td class="tcr">1263</td> <td class="tcr">619</td> <td class="tcr rb">644</td> <td class="tcr">1059</td> <td class="tcr">415</td> <td class="tcr rb">644</td> <td class="tcr">962</td> <td class="tcr">318</td> <td class="tcr rb">644</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> .03</td> <td class="tcr">1218</td> <td class="tcr">597</td> <td class="tcr rb">621</td> <td class="tcr">1013</td> <td class="tcr">390</td> <td class="tcr rb">623</td> <td class="tcr">917</td> <td class="tcr">298</td> <td class="tcr rb">619</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> .1</td> <td class="tcr">1153</td> <td class="tcr">564</td> <td class="tcr rb">589</td> <td class="tcr">952</td> <td class="tcr">360</td> <td class="tcr rb">592</td> <td class="tcr">853</td> <td class="tcr">259</td> <td class="tcr rb">594</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> .3</td> <td class="tcr">1088</td> <td class="tcr">531</td> <td class="tcr rb">557</td> <td class="tcr">876</td> <td class="tcr">324</td> <td class="tcr rb">552</td> <td class="tcr">774</td> <td class="tcr">217</td> <td class="tcr rb">557</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> 1.0</td> <td class="tcr">1011</td> <td class="tcr">491</td> <td class="tcr rb">520</td> <td class="tcr">765</td> <td class="tcr">278</td> <td class="tcr rb">487</td> <td class="tcr">651</td> <td class="tcr">169</td> <td class="tcr rb">482</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> 3.0</td> <td class="tcr">911</td> <td class="tcr">442</td> <td class="tcr rb">469</td> <td class="tcr">582</td> <td class="tcr">206</td> <td class="tcr rb">376</td> <td class="tcr">463</td> <td class="tcr">115</td> <td class="tcr rb">348</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> 5.0</td> <td class="tcr"> </td> <td class="tcr"> </td> <td class="tcr rb"> </td> <td class="tcr">438</td> <td class="tcr">153</td> <td class="tcr rb">285</td> <td class="tcr">334</td> <td class="tcr">80</td> <td class="tcr rb">254</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">10.0</td> <td class="tcr bb"> </td> <td class="tcr bb"> </td> <td class="tcr rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcr bb"> </td> <td class="tcr bb"> </td> <td class="tcr rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcr bb">117</td> <td class="tcr bb">25</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">92</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>These numbers show clearly that there is an increase in ionic +velocity as the dilution proceeds. Moreover, if we compare the +values for the chlorine ion obtained from observations on these +three different salts, we see that as the concentrations diminish +the velocity of the chlorine ion becomes the same in all of them. +A similar relation appears in other cases, and, in general, we may +say that at great dilution the velocity of an ion is independent of +the nature of the other ion present. This introduces the conception +of specific ionic velocities, for which some values at 18° C. +are given by Kohlrausch in Table X.:—</p> + +<p class="center1">Table X.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb tb">K</td> <td class="tcr tb">66</td> <td class="tcc tb">× 10<span class="sp">-5</span> cms.</td> <td class="tcc rb tb">per sec.</td> + <td class="tcl lb tb">Cl</td> <td class="tcr tb">69</td> <td class="tcc tb">× 10<span class="sp">-5</span> cms.</td> <td class="tcc rb tb">per sec.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Na</td> <td class="tcr">45</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td> + <td class="tcl lb">I</td> <td class="tcr">69</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Li</td> <td class="tcr">36</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td> + <td class="tcl lb">NO<span class="su">3</span></td> <td class="tcr">64</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">NH<span class="su">4</span></td> <td class="tcr">66</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td> + <td class="tcl lb">OH</td> <td class="tcr">162</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">H</td> <td class="tcr">320</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td> + <td class="tcl lb">C<span class="su">2</span>H<span class="su">3</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcr">36</td> <td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc rb">”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb bb">Ag</td> <td class="tcr bb">57</td> <td class="tcc bb">”</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">”</td> + <td class="tcl lb bb">C<span class="su">3</span>H<span class="su">5</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcr bb">33</td> <td class="tcc bb">”</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">”</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Having obtained these numbers we can deduce the conductivity +of the dilute solution of any salt, and the comparison of the +calculated with the observed values furnished the first confirmation +of Kohlrausch’s theory. Some exceptions, however, are +known. Thus acetic acid and ammonia give solutions of much +lower conductivity than is indicated by the sum of the specific +ionic velocities of their ions as determined from other compounds. +An attempt to find in Kohlrausch’s theory some explanation of +this discrepancy shows that it could be due to one of two causes. +Either the velocities of the ions must be much less in these +solutions than in others, or else only a fractional part of the +number of molecules present can be actively concerned in conveying +the current. We shall return to this point later.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p><i>Friction on the Ions.</i>—It is interesting to calculate the magnitude +of the forces required to drive the ions with a certain velocity. If +we have a potential gradient of 1 volt per centimetre the electric +force is 10<span class="sp">8</span> in C.G.S. units. The charge of electricity on 1 gram-equivalent +of any ion is 1/.0001036 = 9653 units, hence the mechanical +force acting on this mass is 9653×10<span class="sp">8</span> dynes. This, let us say, +produces a velocity u; then the force required to produce unit +velocity is P<span class="su">A</span> = 9.653×10<span class="sp">11</span>/u dynes = 9.84×10<span class="sp">5</span>/u kilograms-weight. +If the ion have an equivalent weight A, the force producing unit velocity +when acting on 1 gram is P<span class="su">1</span> = 9.84×10<span class="sp">5</span>/Au kilograms-weight. +Thus the aggregate force required to drive 1 gram of potassium ions with +a velocity of 1 centimetre per second through a very dilute solution +must be equal to the weight of 38 million kilograms.</p> + +<p class="center1">Table XI.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">Kilograms-weight.</td> <td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">Kilograms-weight.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="lb"> </td> <td class="tcc">P<span class="su">A</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">P<span class="su">1</span></td> + <td> </td> <td class="tcc">P<span class="su">A</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">P<span class="su">1</span></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">K</td> <td class="tcl">15×10<span class="sp">8</span></td> <td class="tcl rb"> 38×10<span class="sp">6</span></td> + <td class="tcl">Cl</td> <td class="tcl">14 10<span class="sp">8</span></td> <td class="tcl rb">40×10<span class="sp">6</span></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Na</td> <td class="tcl">22 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb"> 95 ”</td> + <td class="tcl">I</td> <td class="tcl">14 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">11 ”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Li</td> <td class="tcl">27 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">390 ”</td> + <td class="tcl">NO<span class="su">3</span></td> <td class="tcl">15 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">25 ”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">NH<span class="su">4</span></td> <td class="tcl">15 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb"> 83 ”</td> + <td class="tcl">OH</td> <td class="tcl"> 5.4 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">32 ”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">H</td> <td class="tcl"> 3.1 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">310 ”</td> + <td class="tcl">C<span class="su">2</span>H<span class="su">8</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcl">27 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb">46 ”</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb bb">Ag</td> <td class="tcl bb">17 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> 16 ”</td> + <td class="tcl bb">C<span class="su">3</span>H<span class="su">5</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcl bb">30 ”</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">41 ”</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Since the ions move with uniform velocity, the frictional resistances +brought into play must be equal and opposite to the driving +forces, and therefore these numbers also represent the ionic friction +coefficients in very dilute solutions at 18° C.</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Direct Measurement of Ionic Velocities.</i>—Sir Oliver Lodge was +the first to directly measure the velocity of an ion (<i>B.A. Report</i>, +1886, p. 389). In a horizontal glass tube connecting two vessels +filled with dilute sulphuric acid he placed a solution of sodium +chloride in solid agar-agar jelly. This solid solution was made +alkaline with a trace of caustic soda in order to bring out the red +colour of a little phenol-phthalein added as indicator. An +electric current was then passed from one vessel to the other. The +hydrogen ions from the anode vessel of acid were thus carried +along the tube, and, as they travelled, decolourized the phenol-phthalein. +By this method the velocity of the hydrogen ion +through a jelly solution under a known potential gradient was +observed to about 0.0026 cm. per sec, a number of the same +order as that required by Kohlrausch’s theory. Direct determinations +of the velocities of a few other ions have been made by +W. C. D. Whetham (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. 184, A, p. 337; vol. 186, A, +p. 507; <i>Phil. Mag.</i>, October 1894). Two solutions having one +ion in common, of equivalent concentrations, different densities, +different colours, and nearly equal specific resistances, were +placed one over the other in a vertical glass tube. In one case, +for example, decinormal solutions of potassium carbonate and +potassium bichromate were used. The colour of the latter is due +to the presence of the bichromate group, Cr<span class="su">2</span>O<span class="su">7</span>. When a current +was passed across the junction, the anions CO<span class="su">3</span> and Cr<span class="su">2</span>O<span class="su">7</span> +travelled in the direction opposite to that of the current, and +their velocity could be determined by measuring the rate at which +the colour boundary moved. Similar experiments were made +with alcoholic solutions of cobalt salts, in which the velocities of +the ions were found to be much less than in water. The behaviour +of agar jelly was then investigated, and the velocity of an ion +through a solid jelly was shown to be very little less than in +an ordinary liquid solution. The velocities could therefore be +measured by tracing the change in colour of an indicator or the +formation of a precipitate. Thus decinormal jelly solutions of +barium chloride and sodium chloride, the latter containing a trace +of sodium sulphate, were placed in contact. Under the influence +of an electromotive force the barium ions moved up the +tube, disclosing their presence by the trace of insoluble barium +sulphate formed. Again, a measurement of the velocity of +the hydrogen ion, when travelling through the solution of an +acetate, showed that its velocity was then only about the +one-fortieth part of that found during its passage through +chlorides. From this, as from the measurements on alcohol +solutions, it is clear that where the equivalent conductivities are +very low the effective velocities of the ions are reduced in the +same proportion.</p> + +<p>Another series of direct measurements has been made by Orme +Masson (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. 192, A, p. 331). He placed the gelatine +solution of a salt, potassium chloride, for example, in a horizontal +glass tube, and found the rate of migration of the potassium and +chlorine ions by observing the speed at which they were replaced +when a coloured anion, say, the Cr<span class="su">2</span>O<span class="su">7</span> from a solution of potassium +bichromate, entered the tube at one end, and a coloured cation, +say, the Cu from copper sulphate, at the other. The coloured +ions are specifically slower than the colourless ions which they +follow, and in this case it follows that the coloured solution has a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page864" id="page864"></a>864</span> +higher resistance than the colourless. For the same current, +therefore, the potential gradient is higher in the coloured solution +and lower in the colourless one. Thus a coloured ion which gets +in front of the advancing boundary finds itself acted on by a +smaller force and falls back into line, while a straggling colourless +ion is pushed forward again. Hence a sharp boundary is preserved. +B. D. Steele has shown that with these sharp boundaries +the use of coloured ions is unnecessary, the junction line being +visible owing to the difference in the optical refractive indices of +two colourless solutions. Once the boundary is formed, too, no +gelatine is necessary, and the motion can be watched through +liquid aqueous solutions (see R. B. Denison and B. D. Steele, +<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1906).</p> + +<p>All the direct measurements which have been made on simple +binary electrolytes agree with Kohlrausch’s results within the +limits of experimental error. His theory, therefore, probably +holds good in such cases, whatever be the solvent, if the proper +values are given to the ionic velocities, <i>i.e.</i> the values expressing +the velocities with which the ions actually move in the solution +of the strength taken, and under the conditions of the experiment. +If we know the specific velocity of any one ion, we can deduce, +from the conductivity of very dilute solutions, the velocity of any +other ion with which it may be associated, a proceeding which +does not involve the difficult task of determining the migration +constant of the compound. Thus, taking the specific ionic +velocity of hydrogen as 0.00032 cm. per second, we can find, by +determining the conductivity of dilute solutions of any acid, the +specific velocity of the acid radicle involved. Or again, since we +know the specific velocity of silver, we can find the velocities of a +series of acid radicles at great dilution by measuring the conductivity +of their silver salts.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>By such methods W. Ostwald, G. Bredig and other observers have +found the specific velocities of many ions both of inorganic and +organic compounds, and examined the relation between constitution +and ionic velocity. The velocity of elementary ions is found to +be a periodic function of the atomic weight, similar elements lying +on corresponding portions of a curve drawn to express the relation +between these two properties. Such a curve much resembles that +giving the relation between atomic weight and viscosity in solution. +For complex ions the velocity is largely an additive property; to +a continuous additive change in the composition of the ion corresponds +a continuous but decreasing change in the velocity. The +following table gives Ostwald’s results for the formic acid series:—</p> + +<p class="center1">Table XII.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb" colspan="2"> </td> + <td class="tcc allb">Velocity.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Difference for CH<span class="su">2</span>.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Formic acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">HCO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">51.2</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Acetic acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">H<span class="su">3</span>C<span class="su">2</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">38.3</td> <td class="tcc rb">-12.9</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Propionic acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">H<span class="su">5</span>C<span class="su">3</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">34.3</td> <td class="tcc rb">- 4.0</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Butyric acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">H<span class="su">7</span>C<span class="su">4</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">30.8</td> <td class="tcc rb">- 3.5</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb">Valeric acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">H<span class="su">9</span>C<span class="su">5</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">28.8</td> <td class="tcc rb">- 2.0</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb bb">Caprionic acid</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">H<span class="su">11</span>C<span class="su">6</span>O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">27.4</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">- 1.4</td></tr> +</table> +</div> + +<p><i>Nature of Electrolytes.</i>—We have as yet said nothing about the +fundamental cause of electrolytic activity, nor considered why, +for example, a solution of potassium chloride is a good conductor, +while a solution of sugar allows practically no current to pass.</p> + +<p>All the preceding account of the subject is, then, independent +of any view we may take of the nature of electrolytes, and stands +on the basis of direct experiment. Nevertheless, the facts +considered point to a very definite conclusion. The specific +velocity of an ion is independent of the nature of the opposite ion +present, and this suggests that the ions themselves, while +travelling through the liquid, are dissociated from each other. +Further evidence, pointing in the same direction, is furnished by +the fact that since the conductivity is proportional to the +concentration at great dilution, the equivalent-conductivity, and +therefore the ionic velocity, is independent of it. The importance +of this relation will be seen by considering the alternative to the +dissociation hypothesis. If the ions are not permanently free +from each other their mobility as parts of the dissolved molecules +must be secured by continual interchanges. The velocity with +which they work their way through the liquid must then increase +as such molecular rearrangements become more frequent, and will +therefore depend on the number of solute molecules, <i>i.e.</i> on the +concentration. On this supposition the observed constancy of +velocity would be impossible. We shall therefore adopt as a +wording hypothesis the theory, confirmed by other phenomena +(see <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electrolysis</a></span>), that an electrolyte consists of dissociated ions.</p> + +<p>It will be noticed that neither the evidence in favour of the +dissociation theory which is here considered, nor that described +in the article <span class="sc">Electrolysis</span>, requires more than the effective +dissociation of the ions from each other. They may well be +connected in some way with solvent molecules, and there are +several indications that an ion consists of an electrified part of the +molecule of the dissolved salt with an attendant atmosphere of +solvent round it. The conductivity of a salt solution depends on +two factors—(1) the fraction of the salt ionized; (2) the velocity +with which the ions, when free from each other, move under the +electric forces.<a name="FnAnchor_12" id="FnAnchor_12" href="#Footnote_12"><span class="sp">12</span></a> When a solution is heated, both these factors may +change. The coefficient of ionization usually, though not always, +decreases; the specific ionic velocities increase. Now the rate of +increase with temperature of these ionic velocities is very nearly +identical with the rate of decrease of the viscosity of the liquid. +If the curves obtained by observations at ordinary temperatures +be carried on they indicate a zero of fluidity and a zero of ionic +velocity about the same point, 38.5° C. below the freezing point of +water (Kohlrausch, <i>Sitz. preuss. Akad. Wiss.</i>, 1901, 42, p. 1026). +Such relations suggest that the frictional resistance to the motion +of an ion is due to the ordinary viscosity of the liquid, and that the +ion is analogous to a body of some size urged through a viscous +medium rather than to a particle of molecular dimensions finding +its way through a crowd of molecules of similar magnitude. +From this point of view W. K. Bousfield has calculated the sizes +of ions on the assumption that Stokes’s theory of the motion of a +small sphere through a viscous medium might be applied (<i>Zeits. +phys. Chem.</i>, 1905, 53, p. 257; <i>Phil. Trans.</i> A, 1906, 206, p. 101). +The radius of the potassium or chlorine ion with its envelope of +water appears to be about 1.2×10<span class="sp">-8</span> centimetres.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>For the bibliography of electrolytic conduction see <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Electrolysis</a></span>. +The books which deal more especially with the particular subject +of the present article are <i>Das Leitvermögen der Elektrolyte</i>, by +F. Kohlrausch and L. Holborn (Leipzig, 1898), and <i>The Theory +of Solution and Electrolysis</i>, by W. C. D. Whetham (Cambridge, +1902).</p> +</div> +<div class="author">(W. C. D. W.)</div> + +<p class="center1">III. <span class="sc">Electric Conduction through Gases</span></p> + +<p>A gas such as air when it is under normal conditions conducts +electricity to a small but only to a very small extent, however +small the electric force acting on the gas may be. The electrical +conductivity of gases not exposed to special conditions is so +small that it was only definitely established in the early years +of the 20th century, although it had engaged the attention of +physicists for more than a hundred years. It had been known +for a long time that a body charged with electricity slowly lost +its charge even when insulated with the greatest care, and though +long ago some physicists believed that part of the leak of +electricity took place through the air, the general view seems to +have been that it was due to almost unavoidable defects in the +insulation or to dust in the air, which after striking the charged +body was repelled from it and went off with some of the charge. +C. A. Coulomb, who made some very careful experiments which +were published in 1785 (<i>Mém. de l’Acad. des Sciences</i>, 1785, p. +612), came to the conclusion that after allowing for the leakage +along the threads which supported the charged body there was +a balance over, which he attributed to leakage through the air. +His view was that when the molecules of air come into contact +with a charged body some of the electricity goes on to the molecules, +which are then repelled from the body carrying their +charge with them. We shall see later that this explanation is +not tenable. C. Matteucci (<i>Ann. chim. phys.</i>, 1850, 28, p. 390) +in 1850 also came to the conclusion that the electricity from a +charged body passes through the air; he was the first to prove +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page865" id="page865"></a>865</span> +that the rate at which electricity escapes is less when the pressure +of the gas is low than when it is high. He found that the rate +was the same whether the charged body was surrounded by air, +carbonic acid or hydrogen. Subsequent investigations have +shown that the rate in hydrogen is in general much less than in +air. Thus in 1872 E. G. Warburg (<i>Pogg. Ann.</i>, 1872, 145, p. 578) +found that the leak through hydrogen was only about one-half +of that through air: he confirmed Matteucci’s observations on +the effect of pressure on the rate of leak, and also found that it +was the same whether the gas was dry or damp. He was inclined +to attribute the leak to dust in the air, a view which was +strengthened by an experiment of J. W. Hittorf’s (<i>Wied. Ann.</i>, +1879, 7, p. 595), in which a small carefully insulated electroscope, +placed in a small vessel filled with carefully filtered gas, retained +its charge for several days; we know now that this was due to +the smallness of the vessel and not to the absence of dust, as it +has been proved that the rate of leak in small vessels is less than +in large ones.</p> + +<p>Great light was thrown on this subject by some experiments +on the rates of leak from charged bodies in closed vessels made +almost simultaneously by H. Geitel (<i>Phys. Zeit.</i>, 1900, 2, p. 116) +and C. T. R. Wilson (<i>Proc. Camb. Phil.</i> Soc., 1900, 11, p. 32). +These observers established that (1) the rate of escape of electricity +in a closed vessel is much smaller than in the open, and +the larger the vessel the greater is the rate of leak; and (2) the rate +of leak does not increase in proportion to the differences of +potential between the charged body and the walls of the vessel: +the rate soon reaches a limit beyond which it does not increase, +however much the potential difference may be increased, provided, +of course, that this is not great enough to cause sparks to pass +from the charged body. On the assumption that the maximum +leak is proportional to the volume, Wilson’s experiments, which +were made in vessels less than 1 litre in volume, showed that in +dust-free air at atmospheric pressure the maximum quantity +of electricity which can escape in one second from a charged +body in a closed volume of V cubic centimetres is about 10<span class="sp">-8</span>V +electrostatic units. E. Rutherford and S. T. Allan (<i>Phys. Zeit.</i>, +1902, 3, p. 225), working in Montreal, obtained results in close +agreement with this. Working between pressures of from +43 to 743 millimetres of mercury, Wilson showed that the +maximum rate of leak is very approximately proportional to +the pressure; it is thus exceedingly small when the pressure +is low—a result illustrated in a striking way by an experiment +of Sir W. Crookes (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i>, 1879, 28, p. 347) in which a +pair of gold leaves retained an electric charge for several months +in a very high vacuum. Subsequent experiments have shown +that it is only in very small vessels that the rate of leak is proportional +to the volume and to the pressure; in large vessels +the rate of leak per unit volume is considerably smaller than in +small ones. In small vessels the maximum rate of leak in different +gases, is, with the exception of hydrogen, approximately proportional +to the density of the gas. Wilson’s results on this point are +shown in the following table (Proc. Roy. Soc., 1901, 60, p. 277):—</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Gas.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Relative Rate of Leak.</td> + <td class="tccm allb"><i>Rate of Leak.</i><br />Sp. Gr.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.00 </td> <td class="tcc rb">1 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb"> .184</td> <td class="tcc rb">2.7 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">1.69 </td> <td class="tcc rb">1.10 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">SO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">2.64 </td> <td class="tcc rb">1.21 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CH<span class="su">3</span>Cl</td> <td class="tcc rb">4.7 </td> <td class="tcc rb">1.09 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Ni(CO)<span class="su">4</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">5.1 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> .867</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>The rate of leak of electricity through gas contained in a closed +vessel depends to some extent on the material of which the walls +of the vessel are made; thus it is greater, other circumstances +being the same, when the vessel is made of lead than when it is +made of aluminium. It also varies, as Campbell and Wood +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 13, p. 265) have shown, with the time of the day, +having a well-marked minimum at about 3 o’clock in the morning: +it also varies from month to month. Rutherford (<i>Phys. Rev.</i>, +1903, 16, p. 183), Cooke (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, 1903 [6], 6, p. 403) and +M’Clennan and Burton (<i>Phys. Rev.</i>, 1903, 16, p. 184) have shown +that the leak in a closed vessel can be reduced by about 30% +by surrounding the vessel with sheets of thick lead, but that the +reduction is not increased beyond this amount, however thick +the lead sheets may be. This result indicates that part of the +leak is due to a very penetrating kind of radiation, which can get +through the thin walls of the vessel but is stopped by the thick +lead. A large part of the leak we are describing is due to the +presence of radioactive substances such as radium and thorium +in the earth’s crust and in the walls of the vessel, and to the +gaseous radioactive emanations which diffuse from them into +the atmosphere. This explains the very interesting effect +discovered by J. Elster and H. Geitel (<i>Phys. Zeit.</i>, 1901, 2, p. 560), +that the rate of leak in caves and cellars when the air is stagnant +and only renewed slowly is much greater than in the open air. +In some cases the difference is very marked; thus they found +that in the cave called the Baumannshöhle in the Harz mountains +the electricity escaped at seven times the rate it did in the air +outside. In caves and cellars the radioactive emanations from +the walls can accumulate and are not blown away as in the +open air.</p> + +<p>The electrical conductivity of gases in the normal state is, +as we have seen, exceedingly small, so small that the investigation +of its properties is a matter of considerable difficulty; there +are, however, many ways by which the electrical conductivity +of a gas can be increased so greatly that the investigation +becomes comparatively easy. Among such methods are raising +the temperature of the gas above a certain point. Gases drawn +from the neighbourhood of flames, electric arcs and sparks, or +glowing pieces of metal or carbon are conductors, as are also +gases through which Röntgen or cathode rays or rays of positive +electricity are passing; the rays from the radioactive metals, +radium, thorium, polonium and actinium, produce the same +effect, as does also ultra-violet light of exceedingly short wave-length. +The gas, after being made a conductor of electricity +by any of these means, is found to possess certain properties; +thus it retains its conductivity for some little time after the agent +which made it a conductor has ceased to act, though the conductivity +diminishes very rapidly and finally gets too small +to be appreciable.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:474px; height:186px" src="images/img865.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 5.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>This and several other properties of conducting gas may +readily be proved by the aid of the apparatus represented in fig. 5. +V is a testing vessel in which an electroscope is placed. Two tubes +A and C are fitted into the vessel, A being connected with a water +pump, while the far end of C is in the region where the gas is +exposed to the agent which makes it a conductor of electricity. +Let us suppose that the gas is made conducting by Röntgen rays +produced by a vacuum tube which is placed in a box, covered +except for a window at B with lead so as to protect the electroscope +from the direct action of the rays. If a slow current of air +is drawn by the water pump through the testing vessel, the charge +on the electroscope will gradually leak away. The leak, however, +ceases when the current of air is stopped. This result shows that +the gas retains its conductivity during the time taken by it to pass +from one end to the other of the tube C.</p> + +<p>The gas loses its conductivity when filtered through a plug of +glass-wool, or when it is made to bubble through water. This +can readily be proved by inserting in the tube C a plug of glass-wool +or a water trap; then if by working the pump a little +harder the same current of air is produced as before, it will be +found that the electroscope will now retain its charge, showing +that the conductivity can, as it were, be filtered out of the gas. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page866" id="page866"></a>866</span> +The conductivity can also be removed from the gas by making +the gas traverse a strong electric field. We can show this by +replacing the tube C by a metal tube with an insulated wire +passing down the axis of the tube. If there is no potential +difference between the wire and the tube then the electroscope +will leak when a current of air is drawn through the vessel, but +the leak will stop if a considerable difference of potential is +maintained between the wire and the tube: this shows that a +strong electric field removes the conductivity from the gas.</p> + +<p>The fact that the conductivity of the gas is removed by +filtering shows that it is due to something mixed with the gas +which is removed from it by filtration, and since the conductivity +is also removed by an electric field, the cause of the conductivity +must be charged with electricity so as to be driven to the sides +of the tube by the electric force. Since the gas as a whole is not +electrified either positively or negatively, there must be both +negative and positive charges in the gas, the amount of electricity +of one sign being equal to that of the other. We are thus led to +the conclusion that the conductivity of the gas is due to electrified +particles being mixed up with the gas, some of these particles +having charges of positive electricity, others of negative. These +electrified particles are called <i>ions</i>, and the process by which the +gas is made a conductor is called the ionization of the gas. We +shall show later that the charges and masses of the ions can be +determined, and that the gaseous ions are not identical with +those met with in the electrolysis of solutions.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 280px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:228px; height:225px" src="images/img866a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 6.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>One very characteristic property of conduction of electricity +through a gas is the relation between the current through the +gas and the electric force which gave rise to it. This relation +is not in general that expressed by Ohm’s law, which always, +as far as our present knowledge extends, expresses the relation +for conduction through metals and electrolytes. With gases, on +the other hand, it is only when the current is very small that +Ohm’s law is true. If we represent graphically by means of a +curve the relation between the current passing between two +parallel metal plates separated by ionized gas and the difference +of potential between the plates, the curve is of the character +shown in fig. 6 when the ordinates represent the current and +the abscissae the difference of potential between the plates. +We see that when the potential difference is very small, <i>i.e.</i> +close to the origin, the curve is approximately straight, but that +soon the current increases much +less rapidly than the potential +difference, and that a stage is +reached when no appreciable +increase of current is produced +when the potential difference is +increased; when this stage is +reached the current is constant, +and this value of the current is +called the “saturation” value. +When the potential difference +approaches the value at which +sparks would pass through the +gas, the current again increases with the potential difference; +thus the curve representing the relation between the current +and potential difference over very wide ranges of potential +difference has the shape shown in fig. 7; curves of this kind +have been obtained by von Schweidler (<i>Wien. Ber.</i>, 1899, +108, p. 273), and J. E. S. Townsend (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, 1901 [6], 1, +p. 198). We shall discuss later the causes of the rise in the +current with large potential differences, when we consider +ionization by collision.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The general features of the earlier part of the curve are readily +explained on the ionization hypothesis. On this view the Röntgen +rays or other ionizing agent acting on the gas between the plates, +produces positive and negative ions at a definite rate. Let us suppose +that q positive and q negative ions are by this means produced +per second between the plates; these under the electric force will +tend to move, the positive ones to the negative plate, the negative +ones to the positive. Some of these ions will reach the plate, others +before reaching the plate will get so near one of the opposite sign that +the attraction between them will cause them to unite and form an +electrically neutral system; when they do this they end their +existence as ions. The current between the plates is proportional +to the number of ions which reach the plates per second. Now it is +evident that we cannot go on taking more ions out of the gas than +are produced; thus we cannot, when the current is steady, have +more than q positive ions driven to the negative plate per second, +and the same number of negative ions to the positive. If each of the +positive ions carries a charge of e units of positive electricity, and +if there is an equal and opposite charge on each negative ion, then +the maximum amount of electricity which can be given to the plates +per second is qe, and this is equal to the saturation current. Thus +if we measure the saturation current, we get a direct measure of the +ionization, and this does not require us to know the value of any +quantity except the constant charge on the ion. If we attempted +to deduce the amount of ionization by measurements of the current +before it was saturated, we should require to know in addition the +velocity with which the ions move under a given electric force, the +time that elapses between the liberation of an ion and its combination +with one of the opposite sign, and the potential difference +between the plates. Thus if we wish to measure the amount of +ionization in a gas we should be careful to see that the current is +saturated.</p> +</div> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:484px; height:228px" src="images/img866b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 7.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>The difference between conduction through gases and through +metals is shown in a striking way when we use potential differences +large enough to produce the saturation current. Suppose we +have got a potential difference between the plates more than +sufficient to produce the saturation current, and let us increase +the distance between the plates. If the gas were to act like a +metallic conductor this would diminish the current, because the +greater length would involve a greater resistance in the circuit. +In the case we are considering the separation of the plates will +<i>increase</i> the current, because now there is a larger volume of gas +exposed to the rays; there are therefore more ions produced, +and as the saturation current is proportional to the number of +ions the saturation current is increased. If the potential difference +between the plates were much less than that required to +saturate the current, then increasing the distance would diminish +the current; the gas for such potential differences obeys Ohm’s +law and the behaviour of the gaseous resistance is therefore +similar to that of a metallic one.</p> + +<p>In order to produce the saturation current the electric field +must be strong enough to drive each ion to the electrode before +it has time to enter into combination with one of the opposite +sign. Thus when the plates in the preceding example are far +apart, it will take a larger potential difference to produce this +current than when the plates are close together. The potential +difference required to saturate the current will increase as the +square of the distance between the plates, for if the ions are to +be delivered in a given time to the plates their speed must be +proportional to the distance between the plates. But the speed +is proportional to the electric force acting on the ion; hence the +electric force must be proportional to the distance between the +plates, and as in a uniform field the potential difference is equal +to the electric force multiplied by the distance between the plates, +the potential difference will vary as the square of this distance.</p> + +<p>The potential difference required to produce saturation will, +other circumstances being the same, increase with the amount +of ionization, for when the number of ions is large and they are +crowded together, the time which will elapse before a positive +one combines with a negative will be smaller than when the +number of ions is small. The ions have therefore to be removed +more quickly from the gas when the ionization is great than +when it is small; thus they must move at a higher speed and +must therefore be acted upon by a larger force.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page867" id="page867"></a>867</span></p> + +<p>When the ions are not removed from the gas, they will increase +until the number of ions of one sign which combine with ions +of the opposite sign in any time is equal to the number produced +by the ionizing agent in that time. We can easily calculate the +number of free ions at any time after the ionizing agent has +commenced to act.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>Let q be the number of ions (positive or negative) produced in +one cubic centimetre of the gas per second by the ionizing agent, +n<span class="su">1</span>, n<span class="su">2</span>, the number of free positive and negative ions respectively per +cubic centimetre of the gas. The number of collisions between +positive and negative ions per second in one cubic centimetre of the +gas is proportional to n<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>. If a certain fraction of the collisions +between the positive and negative ions result in the formation of an +electrically neutral system, the number of ions which disappear per +second on a cubic centimetre will be equal to αn<span class="su">1</span> n<span class="su">2</span>, where α is a +quantity which is independent of n<span class="su">1</span>, n<span class="su">2</span>; hence if t is the time since +the ionizing agent was applied to the gas, we have</p> + +<p class="center1">dn<span class="su">1</span>/dt = q − αn<span class="su">1</span> n<span class="su">2</span>, dn<span class="su">2</span>/dt = q − αn<span class="su">1</span> n<span class="su">2</span>.</p> + +<p class="noind">Thus n<span class="su">1</span> − n<span class="su">2</span> is constant, so if the gas is uncharged to begin with, n<span class="su">1</span> +will always equal n<span class="su">2</span>. Putting n<span class="su">1</span> = n<span class="su">2</span> = n we have</p> + +<p class="center1">dn/dt = q − αn<span class="sp">2</span>  (1),</p> + +<p class="noind">the solution of which is, since n = 0 when t = 0,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">n =</td> <td>k(ε<span class="sp">2kαt</span> − 1)</td> + <td rowspan="2">  (2),</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">ε<span class="sp">2kαt</span> + 1</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">if k<span class="sp">2</span> = q/α. Now the number of ions when the gas has reached a +steady state is got by putting t equal to infinity in the preceding +equation, and is therefore given by the equation</p> + +<p class="center1">n<span class="su">0</span> = k = √ (q/α).</p> + +<p class="noind">We see from equation (1) that the gas will not approximate to its +steady state until 2kαt is large, that is until t is large compared with +½kα or with ½√ (qα). We may thus take ½√ (qα) as a measure of +the time taken by the gas to reach a steady state when exposed to +an ionizing agent; as this time varies inversely as √q we see that +when the ionization is feeble it may take a very considerable time for +the gas to reach a steady state. Thus in the case of our atmosphere +where the production of ions is only at the rate of about 30 per cubic +centimetre per second, and where, as we shall see, α is about 10<span class="sp">-6</span>, +it would take some minutes for the ionization in the air to get into +a steady state if the ionizing agent were suddenly applied.</p> + +<p>We may use equation (1) to determine the rate at which the ions +disappear when the ionizing agent is removed. Putting q=0 in +that equation we get dn/αt = -αn<span class="sp">2</span>.</p> + +<p class="noind">Hence</p> + +<p class="center1">n = n<span class="su">0</span>/(1 + n<span class="su">0</span> αt)  (3),</p> + +<p class="noind">where n<span class="su">0</span> is the number of ions when t = 0. Thus the number of ions +falls to one-half its initial value in the time 1/n<span class="su">0</span>α. The quantity α is +called the <i>coefficient of recombination</i>, and its value for different gases +has been determined by Rutherford (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 1897 [5], 44, p. 422), +Townsend (<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1900, 193, p. 129), McClung (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, +1902 [6], 3, p. 283), Langevin (<i>Ann. chim. phys.</i> [7], 28, p. 289), +Retschinsky (<i>Ann. d. Phys.</i>, 1905, 17, p. 518), Hendred (<i>Phys. Rev.</i>, +1905, 21, p. 314). The values of α/e, e being the charge on an ion in +electrostatic measure as determined by these observers for different +gases, is given in the following table:—</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb"> </td> <td class="tcc allb">Townsend.</td> <td class="tcc allb">McClung.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Langevin.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Retschinsky.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Hendred.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">3420</td> <td class="tcc rb">3380</td> <td class="tcc rb">3200</td> <td class="tcc rb">4140</td> <td class="tcc rb">3500</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">3380</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">3500</td> <td class="tcc rb">3490</td> <td class="tcc rb">3400</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">3020</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">2940</td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> </td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">The gases in these experiments were carefully dried and free from +dust; the apparent value of α is much increased when dust or small +drops of water are present in the gas, for then the ions get caught +by the dust particles, the mass of a particle is so great compared +with that of an ion that they are practically immovable under the +action of the electric field, and so the ions clinging to them escape +detection when electrical methods are used. Taking e as 3.5×10<span class="sp">-10</span>, +we see that α is about 1.2×10<span class="sp">-6</span>, so that the number of recombinations +in unit time between n positive and n negative ions in unit +volume is 1.2×10<span class="sp">-6</span>n<span class="sp">2</span>. The kinetic theory of gases shows that +if we have n molecules of air per cubic centimetre, the number of +collisions per second is 1.2×10<span class="sp">-10</span>n<span class="sp">2</span> at a temperature of 0° C. Thus +we see that the number of recombinations between oppositely +charged ions is enormously greater than the number of collisions +between the same number of neutral molecules. We shall see that +the difference in size between the ion and the molecule is not nearly +sufficient to account for the difference between the collisions in the +two cases; the difference is due to the force between the oppositely +charged ions, which drags ions into collisions which but for this force +would have missed each other.</p> + +<p>Several methods have been used to measure α. In one method +air, exposed to some ionizing agent at one end of a long tube, is +slowly sucked through the tube and the saturation current measured +at different points along the tube. These currents are proportional +to the values of n at the place of observation: if we know the +distance of this place from the end of the tube when the gas was +ionized and the velocity of the stream of gas, we can find t in equation +(3), and knowing the value of n we can deduce the value of α from +the equation</p> + +<p class="center1">1/n<span class="su">1</span> − 1/n<span class="su">2</span> = α(t<span class="su">1</span> − t<span class="su">2</span>),</p> + +<p class="noind">where n<span class="su">1</span>, n<span class="su">2</span> are the values of n at the times t<span class="su">1</span>, t<span class="su">2</span> respectively. In this +method the tubes ought to be so wide that the loss of ions by diffusion +to the sides of the tube is negligible. There are other methods which +involve the knowledge of the speed with which the ions move under +the action of known electric forces; we shall defer the consideration +of these methods until we have discussed the question of these +speeds.</p> + +<p>In measuring the value of α it should be remembered that the +theory of the methods supposes that the ionization is uniform +throughout the gas. If the total ionization throughout a gas remains +constant, but instead of being uniformly distributed is concentrated +in patches, it is evident that the ions will recombine more quickly +in the second case than in the first, and that the value of α will be +different in the two cases. This probably explains the large values +of α obtained by Retschinsky, who ionized the gas by the α rays +from radium, a method which produces very patchy ionization.</p> + +<p><i>Variation of α with the Pressure of the Gas.</i>—All observers agree +that there is little variation in α with the pressures for pressures of +between 5 and 1 atmospheres; at lower pressures, however, the +value of α seems to diminish with the pressure: thus Langevin +(<i>Ann. chim. phys.</i>, 1903, 28, p. 287) found that at a pressure of <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">5</span> +of an atmosphere the value of α was about <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">5</span> of its value at +atmospheric pressure.</p> + +<p><i>Variation of α with the Temperature.</i>—Erikson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, Aug. +1909) has shown that the value of α for air increases as the temperature +diminishes, and that at the temperature of liquid air -180° C., +it is more than twice as great as at +12° C.</p> + +<p>Since, as we have seen, the recombination is due to the coming +together of the positive and negative ions under the influence of the +electrical attraction between them, it follows that a large electric +force sufficient to overcome this attraction would keep the ions apart +and hence diminish the coefficient of recombination. Simple considerations, +however, will show that it would require exceedingly +strong electric fields to produce an appreciable effect. The value of +α indicates that for two oppositely charged ions to unite they must +come within a distance of about 1.5×10<span class="sp">-6</span> centimetres; at this +distance the attraction between them is e<span class="sp">2</span>×10<span class="sp">12</span>/2.25, and if X is the +external electric force, the force tending to pull them apart cannot +be greater than Xe; if this is to be comparable with the attraction, +X must be comparable with e×10<span class="sp">12</span>/2.25, or putting e = 4×10<span class="sp">-10</span>, +with 1.8×10<span class="sp">2</span>; this is 54,000 volts per centimetre, a force which +could not be applied to gas at atmospheric pressure without producing +a spark.</p> + +<p><i>Diffusion of the Ions.</i>—The ionized gas acts like a mixture of gases, +the ions corresponding to two different gases, the non-ionized gas +to a third. If the concentration of the ions is not uniform, they will +diffuse through the non-ionized gas in such a way as to produce a +more uniform distribution. A very valuable series of determinations +of the coefficient of diffusion of ions through various gases has been +made by Townsend (<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1900, A, 193, p. 129). The method +used was to suck the ionized gas through narrow tubes; by measuring +the loss of both the positive and negative ions after the gases +had passed through a known length of tube, and allowing for the loss +by recombination, the loss by diffusion and hence the coefficient of +diffusion could be determined. The following tables give the values +of the coefficients of diffusion D on the C.G.S. system of units as +determined by Townsend:—</p> + +<p class="center1">Table I.—<i>Coefficients of Diffusion (D) in Dry Gases.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">Gas.</td> <td class="tcc allb">D for +ions.</td> <td class="tcc allb">D for -ions.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Mean Value<br />of D.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Ratio of D for<br />- to D for +ions.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">.028</td> <td class="tcc rb">.043 </td> <td class="tcc rb">.0347</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.54</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">.025</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0396</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0323</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.58</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">.023</td> <td class="tcc rb">.026</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0245</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.13</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.123</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.190</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.156 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">1.54</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="center1">Table II.—<i>Coefficients of Diffusion in Moist Gases.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">Gas.</td> <td class="tcc allb">D for +ions.</td> <td class="tcc allb">D for -ions.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Mean Value<br />of D.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Ratio of D for<br />- to D for +ions.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">.032 </td> <td class="tcc rb">.037 </td> <td class="tcc rb">.0335</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.09</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">.0288</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0358</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0323</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.24</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">.0245</td> <td class="tcc rb">.0255</td> <td class="tcc rb">.025 </td> <td class="tcc rb">1.04</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.128 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.142 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">.135 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">1.11</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">It is interesting to compare with these coefficients the values of D +when various gases diffuse through each other. D for hydrogen +through air is .634, for oxygen through air .177, for the vapour of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page868" id="page868"></a>868</span> +isobutyl amide through air .042. We thus see that the velocity +of diffusion of ions through air is much less than that of the simple +gas, but that it is quite comparable with that of the vapours of some +complex organic compounds.</p> + +<p>The preceding tables show that the negative ions diffuse more +rapidly than the positive, especially in dry gases. The superior +mobility of the negative ions was observed first by Zeleny (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, +1898 [5], 46, p. 120), who showed that the velocity of the negative +ions under an electric force is greater than that of the positive. It +will be noticed that the difference between the mobility of the +negative and the positive ions is much more pronounced in dry +gases than in moist. The difference in the rates of diffusion of the +positive and negative ions is the reason why ionized gas, in which, +to begin with, the positive and negative charges were of equal +amounts, sometimes becomes electrified even although the gas is not +acted upon by electric forces. Thus, for example, if such gas be +blown through narrow tubes, it will be positively electrified when +it comes out, for since the negative ions diffuse more rapidly than +the positive, the gas in its passage through the tubes will lose by +diffusion more negative than positive ions and hence will emerge +positively electrified. Zeleny snowed that this effect does not occur +when, as in carbonic acid gas, the positive and negative ions diffuse +at the same rates. Townsend (loc. cit.) showed that the coefficient +of diffusion of the ions is the same whether the ionization is produced +by Röntgen rays, radioactive substances, ultra-violet light, or +electric sparks. The ions produced by chemical reactions and in +flames are much less mobile; thus, for example, Bloch (<i>Ann. chim. +phys.</i>, 1905 [8], 4, p. 25) found that for the ions produced by drawing +air over phosphorus the value of α/e was between 1 and 6 instead +of over 3000, the value when the air was ionized by Röntgen rays.</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Velocity of Ions in an Electric Field.</i>—The velocity of ions in an +electric field, which is of fundamental importance in conduction, +is very closely related to the coefficient of diffusion. Measurements +of this velocity for ions produced by Röntgen rays have +been made by Rutherford (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 44, p. 422), Zeleny +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 46, p. 120), Langevin (<i>Ann. Chim. Phys.</i>, 1903, +28, p. 289), Phillips (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 78, A, p. 167), and Wellisch +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1909, 209, p. 249). The ions produced by radioactive +substance have been investigated by Rutherford (<i>Phil. +Mag.</i> [5], 47, p. 109) and by Franck and Pohl (<i>Verh. deutsch. phys. +Gesell.</i>, 1907, 9, p. 69), and the negative ions produced when ultra-violet +light falls on a metal plate by Rutherford (<i>Proc. Camb. Phil. +Soc.</i> 9, p. 401). H. A. Wilson (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 192, p. 4O9), Marx (<i>Ann. +de Phys.</i> 11, p. 765), Moreau (<i>Journ. de Phys.</i> 4, 11, p. 558; <i>Ann. +Chim. Phys.</i> 7, 30, p. 5) and Gold (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 79, p. 43) have +investigated the velocities of ions produced by putting various +salts into flames; McClelland (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 46, p. 29) the velocity +of the ions in gases sucked from the neighbourhood of flames and +arcs; Townsend (<i>Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.</i> 9, p. 345) and Bloch +(<i>loc. cit.</i>) the velocity of ions produced by chemical reaction; and +Chattock (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 48, p. 401) the velocity of the ions produced +when electricity escapes from a sharp needle point into a gas.</p> + +<p>Several methods have been employed to determine these +velocities. The one most frequently employed is to find the +electromotive intensity required to force an ion against the +stream of gas moving with a known velocity parallel to the lines +of electric force. Thus, of two perforated plane electrodes +vertically over each other, suppose the lower to be positively, +the upper negatively electrified, and suppose that the gas is +streaming vertically downwards with the velocity V; then unless +the upward velocity of the positive ion is greater than V, no +positive electricity will reach the upper plate. If we increase +the strength of the field between the plates, and hence the upward +velocity of the positive ion, until the positive ions just begin to +reach the upper plate, we know that with this strength of field the +velocity of the positive ion is equal to V. By this method, which +has been used by Rutherford, Zeleny and H. A. Wilson, the +velocity of ions in fields of various strengths has been determined.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The arrangement used by Zeleny is represented in fig. 8. P and +Q are square brass plates. They are bored through their centres, +and to the openings the tubes R and S are attached, the space +between the plates being covered in so as to form a closed box. +K is a piece of wire gauze completely covering the opening in Q; +T is an insulated piece of wire gauze nearly but not quite filling the +opening in the plate P, and connected with one pair of quadrants of an +electrometer E. A plug of glass wool G filters out the dust from a +stream of gas which enters the vessel by the tube D and leaves it by +F; this plug also makes the velocity of the flow of the gas uniform +across the section of the tube. The Röntgen rays to ionize the gas +were produced by a bulb at O, the bulb and coil being in a lead-covered +box, with an aluminium window through which the rays +passed. Q is connected with one pole of a battery of cells, P and the +other pole of the battery are put to earth. The changes in the +potential of T are due to ions giving up their charges to it. With a +given velocity of air-blast the potential of T was found not to change +unless the difference of potential between P and Q exceeded a critical +value. The field corresponding to this critical value thus made the +ions move with the known velocity of the blast.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:447px; height:250px" src="images/img868a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 8.</span></td></tr></table> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: right; width: 356px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figright1"><img style="width:306px; height:68px" src="images/img868b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 9.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>Another method which has been employed by Rutherford and +McClelland is based on the action of an electric field in destroying +the conductivity of gas streaming through it. Suppose that BAB, +DCD (fig. 9) are a system of parallel plates boxed in so that a stream +of gas, after flowing between BB, passes between DD without any +loss of gas in the interval. Suppose the plates DD are insulated, and +connected with one pair of quadrants of an electrometer, by charging +up C to a sufficiently high potential we can drive all the positive +ions which enter the system DCD against the plates D; this will +cause a deflexion of the electrometer, which in one second will be +proportional to the number of positive ions which have entered the +system in that time. If we charge A up to a high potential, B being +put to earth, we shall find +that the deflexion of the electrometer +connected with +DD is less than it was when +A and B were at the same +potential, because some of +the positive ions in their +passage through BAB are driven against the plates B. If u is the +velocity along the lines of force in the uniform electric field between +A and B, and t the time it takes for the gas to pass through BAB, then +all the positive ions within a distance ut of the plates B will be driven +up against these plates, and thus if the positive ions are equally distributed +through the gas, the number of positive ions which emerge +from the system when the electric field is on will bear to the number +which emerge when the field is off the ratio of 1 − ut/l to unity, where +l is the distance between A and B. This ratio is equal to the ratio of +the deflexions in one second of the electrometer attached to D, hence +the observations of this instrument give 1 − ut/l. If we know the +velocity of the gas and the length of the plates A and B, we can +determine t, and since l can be easily measured, we can find u, the +velocity of the positive ion in a field of given strength. By charging +A and C negatively instead of positively we can arrive at the +velocity of the negative ion. In practice it is more convenient to use +cylindrical tubes with coaxial wires instead of the systems of parallel +plates, though in this case the calculation of the velocity of the ions +from the observations is a little more complicated, inasmuch as the +electric field is not uniform between the tubes.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: right; width: 260px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figright1"><img style="width:212px; height:152px" src="images/img868c.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption"><span class="sc">Fig. 10.</span></td></tr></table> + +<p>A method which gives very accurate results, though it is only +applicable in certain cases, is the one used by Rutherford to measure +the velocity of the negative ions produced close to a metal plate by +the incidence on the plate of ultra-violet light. The principle of the +method is as follows:—AB (fig. 10) is an insulated horizontal plate +of well-polished zinc, which can be +moved vertically up and down by +means of a screw; it is connected with +one pair of quadrants of an electrometer, +the other pair of quadrants being +put to earth. CD is a base-plate with a +hole EF in it; this hole is covered with +fine wire gauze, through which ultra-violet +light passes and falls on the plate +AB. The plate CD is connected with +an alternating current dynamo, which +produces a simply-periodic potential +difference between AB and CD, the other pole being put to earth. +Suppose that at any instant the plate CD is at a higher potential than +AB, then the negative ions from AB will move towards CD, and will +continue to do so as long as the potential of CD is higher than that of +AB. If, however, the potential difference changes sign before the negative +ions reach CD, these ions will go back to AB. Thus AB will not +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page869" id="page869"></a>869</span> +lose any negative charge unless the distance between the plates AB and +CD is less than the distance traversed by the negative ion during the +time the potential of CD is higher than that of AB. By altering the +distance between the plates until CD just begins to lose a negative +charge, we find the velocity of the negative ion under unit electromotive +intensity. For suppose the difference of potential between +AB and CD is equal to a sin pt, then if d is the distance between the +plates, the electric intensity is equal to a sin pt/d; if we suppose the +velocity of the ion is proportional to the electric intensity, and if u +is the velocity for unit electric intensity, the velocity of the negative +ion will be ua sin pt/d. Hence if x represent the distance of the ion +from AB</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>dx</td> <td rowspan="2">=</td> <td>ua</td> <td rowspan="2">sin pt</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">dT</td> <td class="denom">d</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">x =</td> <td>ua</td> <td rowspan="2">(1 − cos pt), if x = 0 when t = 0.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">pd</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Thus the greatest distance the ion can get from the plate is equal +to 2au/pd, and if the distance between the plates is gradually reduced +to this value, the plate AB will begin to lose a negative charge; hence +when this happens</p> + +<p class="center1">d = 2au/pd,  or u = pd<span class="sp">2</span>/2a,</p> + +<p class="noind">an equation by means of which we can find u.</p> + +<p>In this form the method is not applicable when ions of both signs +are present. Franck and Pohl (<i>Verh. deutsch. physik. Gesell.</i> 1907, +9, p. 69) have by a slight modification removed this restriction. +The modification consists in confining the ionization to a layer of gas +below the gauze EF. If the velocity of the positive ions is to be +determined, these ions are forced through the gauze by applying +to the ionized gas a small constant electric force acting upwards; +if negative ions are required, the constant force is reversed. After +passing through the gauze the ions are acted upon by alternating +forces as in Rutherford’s method.</p> + +<p>Langevin (<i>Ann. chim. phys.</i>, 1903, 28, p. 289) devised a method +of measuring the velocity of the ions which has been extensively +used; it has the advantage of not requiring the rate of ionization +to remain uniform. The general idea is as follows. Suppose that +we expose the gas between two parallel plates A, B to Röntgen rays +or some other ionizing agent, then stop the rays and apply a uniform +electric field to the region between the plates. If the force on the +positive ion is from A to B, the plate B will receive a positive charge +of electricity. After the electric force has acted for a time T reverse +it. B will now begin to receive negative electricity and will go on +doing so until the supply of negative ions is exhausted. Let us +consider how the quantity of positive electricity received by B will +vary with T. To fix our ideas, suppose the positive ions move more +slowly than the negative; let T<span class="su">2</span> and T<span class="su">1</span> be respectively the times +taken by the positive and negative ions to move under the electric +field through a distance equal to AB, the distance between the +planes. Then if T is greater than T<span class="su">2</span> all the ions will have been +driven from between the plates before the field is reversed, and therefore +the positive charge received by B will not depend upon T. +Next let T be less than T<span class="su">2</span> but greater than T<span class="su">1</span>; then at the time +when the field is reversed all the negative ions will have been driven +from between the plates, so that the positive charge received by B +will not be neutralized by the arrival of fresh ions coming to it after +the reversal of the field. The number of positive ions driven against +the plate B will be proportional to T. Thus if we measure the value +of the positive charge on B for a series of values of T, each value being +less than the preceding, we shall find that until T reaches a certain +value the charge remains constant, but as soon as we reduce the +time below this value the charge diminishes. The value of T when +the diminution in the field begins is T<span class="su">2</span>, the time taken for a positive +ion to cross from A to B under the electric field; thus from T<span class="su">2</span> we +can calculate the velocity of the positive ion in this field. If we still +further diminish T, we shall find that we reach a value when the +diminution of the positive charge on B with the time suddenly +becomes much more rapid; this change occurs when T falls below T<span class="su">1</span> +the time taken for the negative ions to go from one plate to the other, +for now when the field is reversed there are still some negative ions +left between the plates, and these will be driven against B and rob it +of some of the positive charge it had acquired before the field was +reversed. By observing the time when the increase in the rate of +diminution of the positive charge with the time suddenly sets in +we can determine T<span class="su">1</span>, and hence the velocity of the negative ions.</p> + +<p>The velocity of the ions produced by the discharge of electricity +from a fine point was determined by Chattock by an entirely different +method. In this case the electric field is so strong and the velocity +of the ion so great that the preceding methods are not applicable. +Suppose P represents a vertical needle discharging electricity into +air, consider the force acting on the ions included between two +horizontal planes A, B. If P is the density of the electrification, +and Z the vertical component of the electric intensity, F the resultant +force on the ions between A and B is vertical and equal to</p> + +<p class="center1"><span class="f150">∫∫∫</span> Zρ dxdydz.</p> + +<p class="noind">Let us suppose that the velocity of the ion is proportional to the +electric intensity, so that if w is the vertical velocity of the ions, +which are supposed all to be of one sign, w = RZ.</p> + +<p>Substituting this value of Z, the vertical force on the ions between +A and B is equal to</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f150">∫∫∫</span> wρ dxdydz.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">R</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">But ∫∫ wρdxdy = ι, where ι is the current streaming from the point. +This current, which can be easily measured by putting a galvanometer +in series with the discharging point, is independent of z, +the vertical distance of a plane between A and B below the charging +point. Hence we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">F =</td> <td>ι</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f150">∫</span>dz  =</td> + <td>ι</td> <td rowspan="2"> · z.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">R</td> <td class="denom">R</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">This force must be counterbalanced by the difference of gaseous +pressures over the planes A and B; hence if p<span class="su">B</span> and p<span class="su">A</span> denote +respectively the pressures over B and A, we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">p<span class="su">B</span> − p<span class="su">A</span> =</td> <td>ι</td> + <td rowspan="2">z.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">R</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Hence by the measurement of these pressures we can determine +R, and hence the velocity with which an ion moves under a given +electric intensity.</p> + +<p>There are other methods of determining the velocities of the +ions, but as these depend on the theory of the conduction of electricity +through a gas containing charged ions, we shall consider them in our +discussion of that theory.</p> + +<p>By the use of these methods it has been shown that the velocities +of the ions in a given gas are the same whether the ionization is +produced by Röntgen rays, radioactive substances, ultra-violet +light, or by the discharge of electricity from points. When the +ionization is produced by chemical action the ions are very much +less mobile, moving in the same electric field with a velocity less +than one-thousandth part of the velocity of the first kind of ions. +On the other hand, as we shall see later, the velocity of the negative +ions in flames is enormously greater than that of even the first kind +of ion under similar electric fields and at the same pressure. But +when these negative ions get into the cold part of the flame, they +move sluggishly with velocities of the order of those possessed by +the second kind. The results of the various determinations of the +velocities of the ions are given in the following table. The velocities +are in centimetres per second under an electric force of one volt per +centimetre, the pressure of the gas being 1 atmosphere. V+ +denotes the velocity of the positive ion, V- that of the negative. +V is the mean velocity of the positive and negative ions.</p> + +<p class="center1"><i>Velocities of Ions.—Ions produced by Röntgen Rays.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">Gas.</td> <td class="tcc allb">V+.</td> <td class="tcc allb">V-.</td> <td class="tcc allb">V.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Observer.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.6</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rutherford</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air (dry)</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.36</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.87</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Zeleny</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">  ”</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.60</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.70</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Langevin</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">  ”</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.39</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.78</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Phillips</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">  ”</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.54</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.78</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Wellisch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air (moist)</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.37</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.81</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Zeleny</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Oxygen (dry)</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.36</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.80</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Oxygen (moist)</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.29</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.52</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonic acid (dry)</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.76</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.81</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">  ”  ”</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.86</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.90</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Langevin</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">  ”  ”</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.81</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.85</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Wellisch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonic acid (moist)</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.82</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.75</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Zeleny</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Hydrogen (dry)</td> <td class="tcc rb">6.70</td> <td class="tcc rb">7.95</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nitrogen</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.6</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rutherford</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Sulphur dioxide</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.44</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.41</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Wellisch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Hydrochloric acid</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.27</td> <td class="tcl rb">Rutherford</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Chlorine</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.0</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Helium (dry)</td> <td class="tcc rb">5.09</td> <td class="tcc rb">6.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Franck and Pohl</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbon monoxide</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.10</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.14</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb">Wellisch</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Nitrous oxide</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.82</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.90</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ammonia</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.74</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.80</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Aldehyde</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.30</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl alcohol</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.34</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.27</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Acetone</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.29</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl chloride</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.33</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Pentane</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.36</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.35</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Methyl acetate</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.33</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.36</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl formate</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.30</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl ether</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.29</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ethyl acetate</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.28</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Methyl bromide</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.29</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.28</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Methyl iodide</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.21</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.22</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbon tetrachloride</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.30</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.31</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb"> ”</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Ethyl iodide</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">0.17</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">0.16</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> ”</td></tr> +</table> + +<table class="nobctr" style="width: 70%;" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="pt2 tcc" colspan="3"><i>Ions produced by Ultra-Violet Light.</i></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl">Air</td> <td class="tcc">1.4 </td> <td class="tcl">Rutherford</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">Hydrogen</td> <td class="tcc">3.9 </td> <td class="tcl">Rutherford</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">Carbonic acid</td> <td class="tcc">0.78 </td> <td class="tcl">Rutherford<span class="pagenum"><a name="page870" id="page870"></a>870</span></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="pt2 tcc" colspan="3"><i>Ions in Gases sucked from Flames.</i></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl" colspan="2">Velocities varying from .04 to .23</td> <td class="tcl">McClelland</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="pt2 tcc" colspan="3"><i>Ions in Flames containing Salts.</i></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl">Negative ions</td> <td class="tcc">12.9 cm./sec.</td> <td class="tcl">Gold</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">+ions for salts of Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs</td> <td class="tcc"> 62</td> <td class="tcl">H. A. Wilson</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc">200</td> <td class="tcl">Marx</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc">”</td> <td class="tcc"> 80</td> <td class="tcl">Moreau</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="pt2 tcc" colspan="3"><i>Ions liberated by Chemical Action.</i></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl" colspan="2">Velocities of the order of 0.0005 cm./sec.</td> <td class="tcl">Bloch</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="center pt2"><i>Ions from Point Discharge.</i></p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb tb">Hydrogen</td> <td class="tcl rb tb">5.4</td> <td class="tcl rb tb">7.43</td> <td class="tcc rb tb">6.41</td> <td class="tcc rb tb">Chattock</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonic acid</td> <td class="tcl rb">0.83</td> <td class="tcl rb">0.925</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.88</td> <td class="tcc rb">Chattock</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcl rb">1.32</td> <td class="tcl rb">1.80</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.55</td> <td class="tcc rb">Chattock</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Oxygen</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">1.30</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">1.85</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">1.57</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">Chattock</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>It will be seen from this table that the greater mobility of the +negative ions is very much more marked in the case of the lighter +and simpler gases than in that of the heavier and more complicated +ones; with the vapours of organic substances there seems but little +difference between the mobilities of the positive and negative ions, +indeed in one or two cases the positive one seems slightly but very +slightly the more mobile of the two. In the case of the simple gases +the difference is much greater when the gases are dry than when they +are moist. It has been shown by direct experiment that the velocities +are directly proportional to the electric force.</p> + +<p><i>Variation of Velocities with Pressure.</i>—Until the pressure gets low +the velocities of the ions, negative as well as positive, vary inversely +as the pressure. Langevin (loc. cit.) was the first to show that at very +low pressures the velocity of the negative ions increases more +rapidly as the pressure is diminished than this law indicates. If the +nature of the ion did not change with the pressure, the kinetic theory +of gases indicates that the velocity would vary inversely as the +pressure, so that Langevin’s results indicate a change in the nature +of the negative ion when the pressure is diminished below a certain +value. Langevin’s results are given in the following table, where p +represents the pressure measured in centimetres of mercury, V+ and +V- the velocities of the positive and negative ions in air under +unit electrostatic force, <i>i.e.</i> 300 volts per centimetre:—</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">Negative Ions.</td> <td class="tcc allb" colspan="3">Positive Ions.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">p.</td> <td class="tcc allb">V-.</td> <td class="tcc allb">pV-/76.</td> + <td class="tcc allb">p.</td> <td class="tcc allb">V+.</td> <td class="tcc allb">pV+/76.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcr lb rb">7.5</td> <td class="tcr rb">6560</td> <td class="tcc rb">647</td> <td class="tcr rb">7.5</td> <td class="tcr rb">4430</td> <td class="tcc rb">437</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcr lb rb">20.0</td> <td class="tcr rb">2204</td> <td class="tcc rb">580</td> <td class="tcr rb">20.0</td> <td class="tcr rb">1634</td> <td class="tcc rb">430</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcr lb rb">41.5</td> <td class="tcr rb">994</td> <td class="tcc rb">530</td> <td class="tcr rb">41.5</td> <td class="tcr rb">782</td> <td class="tcc rb">427</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcr lb rb">76.0</td> <td class="tcr rb">510</td> <td class="tcc rb">510</td> <td class="tcr rb">76.0</td> <td class="tcr rb">480</td> <td class="tcc rb">420</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcr lb rb bb">142.0</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">270</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">505</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">142.0</td> <td class="tcr rb bb">225</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">425</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">The increase in the case of pV- indicates that the structure of the +negative ion gets simpler as the pressure is reduced. Wallisch in +some experiments made at the Cavendish Laboratory found that the +diminution in the value of pV- at low pressures is much more marked +in some gases than in others, and in some gases he failed to detect +it; but it must be remembered that it is difficult to get measurements +at pressures of only a few millimetres, as the amount of ionization +is so exceedingly small at such pressures that the quantities to be +observed are hardly large enough to admit of accurate measurements +by the methods available at higher pressures.</p> + +<p><i>Effect of Temperature on the Velocity of the Ions.</i>—Phillips (<i>Proc. +Roy. Soc.</i>, 1906, 78, p. 167) investigated, using Langevin’s method, +the velocities of the + and − ions through air at atmospheric +pressure at temperatures ranging from that of boiling liquid air to +411° C.; R<span class="su">1</span> and R<span class="su">2</span> are the velocities of the + and − ions respectively +when the force is a volt per centimetre.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> + +<tr><td class="tcc allb">R<span class="su">1</span>.</td> <td class="tcc allb">R<span class="su">2</span>.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Temperature Absolute.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">2.00</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.495</td> <td class="tcc rb">411°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.95</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.40</td> <td class="tcc rb">399°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.85</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.30</td> <td class="tcc rb">383°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.81</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.21</td> <td class="tcc rb">373°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.67</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.125</td> <td class="tcc rb">348°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.60</td> <td class="tcl rb">2.00</td> <td class="tcc rb">333°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">1.39</td> <td class="tcl rb">1.785</td> <td class="tcc rb">285°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">0.945</td> <td class="tcl rb">1.23</td> <td class="tcc rb">209°</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">0.235</td> <td class="tcl rb bb">0.235</td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> 94°</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>We see that except in the case of the lowest temperature, that of +liquid air, where there is a great drop in the velocity, the velocities +of the ions are proportional to the absolute temperature. On the +hypothesis of an ion of constant size we should, from the kinetic +theory of gases, expect the velocity to be proportional to the square +root of the absolute temperature, if the charge on the ion did not +affect the number of collisions between the ion and the molecules of +the gas through which it is moving. If the collisions were brought +about by the electrical attraction between the ions and the molecules, +the velocity would be proportional to the absolute temperature. +H. A. Wilson (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 192, p. 499), in his experiments on the +conduction of flames and hot gases into which salts had been put, +found that the velocity of the positive ions in flames at a temperature +of 2000° C. containing the salts of the alkali metals was 62 cm./sec. +under an electric force of one volt per centimetre, while the velocity +of the positive ions in a stream of hot air at 1000° C. containing the +same salts was only 7 cm./sec. under the same force. The great effect +of temperature is also shown in some experiments of McClelland +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 46, p. 29) on the velocities of the ions in gases drawn +from Bunsen flames and arcs; he found that these depended upon +the distance the gas had travelled from the flame. Thus, the velocity +of the ions at a distance of 5.5 cm. from the Bunsen flame when the +temperature was 230° C. was .23 cm./sec. for a volt per centimetre; +at a distance of 10 cm. from the flame when the temperature was +160° C. the velocity was .21 cm./sec; while at a distance of 14.5 +cm. from the flame when the temperature was 105° C. the velocity +was only .04 cm./sec. If the temperature of the gas at this distance +from the flame was raised by external means, the velocity of the ions +increased.</p> + +<p>We can derive some information as to the constitution of the +ions by calculating the velocity with which a molecule of the gas +would move in the electric field if it carried the same charge as the +ion. From the theory of the diffusion of gases, as developed by +Maxwell, we know that if the particles of a gas A are surrounded +by a gas B, then, if the partial pressure of A is small, the velocity u +with which its particles will move when acted upon by a force Xe +is given by the equation</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">u =</td> <td>Xe</td> <td rowspan="2">D,</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">(p<span class="su">1</span>/N<span class="su">1</span>)</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where D represents the coefficient of inter-diffusion of A into B, +and N<span class="su">1</span> the number of particles of A per cubic centimetre when the +pressure due to A is p<span class="su">1</span>. Let us calculate by this equation the +velocity with which a molecule of hydrogen would move through +hydrogen if it carried the charge carried by an ion, which we shall +prove shortly to be equal to the charge carried by an atom of hydrogen +in the electrolysis of solutions. Since p<span class="su">1</span>/N<span class="su">1</span> is independent of the +pressure, it is equal to Π/N, where Π is the atmospheric pressure and +N the number of molecules in a cubic centimetre of gas at atmospheric +pressure. Now N<span class="su">e</span> = 1.22×10<span class="sp">10</span>, if e is measured in electrostatic +units; Π = 10<span class="sp">6</span> and D in this case is the coefficient of diffusion +of hydrogen into itself, and is equal to 1.7. Substituting these values +we find</p> + +<p class="center1">u = 1.97×10<span class="sp">4</span>X.</p> + +<p class="noind">If the potential gradient is 1 volt per centimetre, X = <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">300</span>. Substituting +this value for X, we find u = 66 cm./sec, for the velocity of +a hydrogen molecule. We have seen that the velocity of the ion in +hydrogen is only about 5 cm./sec, so that the ion moves more slowly +than it would if it were a single molecule. One way of explaining +this is to suppose that the ion is bigger than the molecule, and is +in fact an aggregation of molecules, the charged ion acting as a +nucleus around which molecules collect like dust round a charged +body. This view is supported by the effect produced by moisture in +diminishing the velocity of the negative ion, for, as C. T. R. Wilson +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 193, p. 289) has shown, moisture tends to collect +round the ions, and condenses more easily on the negative than on +the positive ion. In connexion with the velocities of ions in the +gases drawn from flames, we find other instances which suggest +that condensation takes place round the ions. An increase in the +size of the system is not, however, the only way by which the velocity +might fall below that calculated for the hydrogen molecule, for we +must remember that the hydrogen molecule, whose coefficient of +diffusion is 1.7, is not charged, while the ion is. The forces exerted +by the ion on the other molecules of hydrogen are not the same as +those which would be exerted by a molecule of hydrogen, and as the +coefficient of diffusion depends on the forces between the molecules, +the coefficient of diffusion of a charged molecule into hydrogen might +be very different from that of an uncharged one.</p> + +<p>Wellisch (<i>loc. cit.</i>) has shown that the effect of the charge on the +ion is sufficient in many cases to explain the small velocity of the ions, +even if there were no aggregation.</p> + +<p><i>Mixture of Gases.</i>—The ionization of a mixture of gases raises +some very interesting questions. If we ionize a mixture of two +very different gases, say hydrogen and carbonic acid, and investigate +the nature of the ions by measuring their velocities, the question +arises, shall we find two kinds of positive and two kinds of negative +ions moving with different velocities, as we should do if some of the +positive ions were positively charged hydrogen molecules, while +others were positively charged molecules of carbonic acid; or shall +we find only one velocity for the positive ions and one for the negative? +Many experiments have been made on the velocity of ions +in mixtures of two gases, but as yet no evidence has been found of +the existence of two different kinds of either positive or negative +ions in such mixtures, although some of the methods for determining +the velocities of the ions, especially Langevin’s, ought to give +evidence of this effect, if it existed. The experiments seem to show +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page871" id="page871"></a>871</span> +that the positive (and the same is true for the negative) ions in a +mixture of gases are all of the same kind. This conclusion is one of +considerable importance, as it would not be true if the ions consisted +of single molecules of the gas from which they are produced.</p> + +<p><i>Recombination.</i>—Several methods enable us to deduce the coefficient +of recombination of the ions when we know their velocities. +Perhaps the simplest of these consists in determining the relation +between the current passing between two parallel plates immersed +in ionized gas and the potential difference between the plates. For +let q be the amount of ionization, <i>i.e.</i> the number of ions produced +per second per unit volume of the gas, A the area of one of the plates, +and d the distance between them; then if the ionization is constant +through the volume, the number of ions of one sign produced per +second in the gas is qAd. Now if i is the current per unit area of +the plate, e the charge on an ion, iA/e ions of each sign are driven +out of the gas by the current per second. In addition to this source +of loss of ions there is the loss due to the recombination; if n is the +number of positive or negative ions per unit volume, then the +number which recombine per second is αn<span class="sp">2</span> per cubic centimetre, +and if n is constant through the volume of the gas, as will approximately +be the case if the current through the gas is only a small +fraction of the saturation current, the number of ions which disappear +per second through recombination is αn<span class="sp">2</span>·Ad. Hence, since when +the gas is in a steady state the number of ions produced must be +equal to the number which disappear, we have</p> + +<p class="center1">qAd = iA/e + αn<span class="sp">2</span>·Ad,<br /> +q = i/ed + αn<span class="sp">2</span>.</p> + +<p class="noind">If u<span class="su">1</span> and u<span class="su">2</span> are the velocities with which the positive and negative +ions move, nu<span class="su">1</span>e and nu<span class="su">2</span>e are respectively the quantities of positive +electricity passing in one direction through unit area of the gas per +second, and of negative in the opposite direction, hence</p> + +<p class="center1">i = nu<span class="su">1</span>e + nu<span class="su">2</span>e.</p> + +<p class="noind">If X is the electric force acting on the gas, k<span class="su">1</span> and k<span class="su">2</span> the velocities +of the positive and negative ions under unit force, u<span class="su">1</span> = k<span class="su">1</span>X, +u<span class="su">2</span> = k<span class="su">2</span>X; hence</p> + +<p class="center1">n = i/(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)Xe,</p> + +<p class="noind">and we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">q =</td> <td>i</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>αi<span class="sp">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">ed</td> <td class="denom">(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">2</span> e<span class="sp">2</span>X<span class="sp">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">But qed is the saturation current per unit area of the plate; calling +this I, we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">I − i =</td> <td>dαi<span class="sp">2</span></td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">e(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">2</span>X<span class="sp">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">X<span class="sp">2</span> =</td> <td>i<span class="sp">2</span>·dα</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">e(I − i) (k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Hence if we determine corresponding values of X and i we can +deduce the value of α/e if we also know (k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>). The value of I +is easily determined, as it is the current when X is very large. The +preceding result only applies when i is small compared with I, +as it is only in this case that the values of n and X are uniform +throughout the volume of the gas. Another method which answers +the same purpose is due to Langevin (<i>Ann. Chim. Phys.</i>, 1903, 28, +p. 289); it is as follows. Let A and B be two parallel planes immersed +in a gas, and let a slab of the gas bounded by the planes a, b parallel +to A and B be ionized by an instantaneous flash of Röntgen rays. +If A and B are at different electric potentials, then all the positive +ions produced by the rays will be attracted by the negative plate +and all the negative ions by the positive, if the electric field were +exceedingly large they would reach these plates before they had time +to recombine, so that each plate would receive N<span class="su">0</span> ions if the flash of +Röntgen rays produced N<span class="su">0</span> positive and N<span class="su">0</span> negative ions. With +weaker fields the number of ions received by the plates will be less +as some of them will recombine before they can reach the plates. +We can find the number of ions which reach the plates in this case +in the following way:—In consequence of the movement of the ions +the slab of ionized gas will broaden out and will consist of three +portions, one in which there are nothing but positive ions,—this is +on the side of the negative plate,—another on the side of the positive +plate in which there are nothing but negative ions, and a portion +between these in which there are both positive and negative ions; +it is in this layer that recombination takes place, and here if n is the +number of positive or negative ions at the time t after the flash of +Röntgen rays,</p> + +<p class="center1">n = n<span class="su">0</span>/(1 + αn<span class="su">0</span>t).</p> + +<p class="noind">With the same notation as before, the breadth of either of the outer +layers will in time dt increase by X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)dt, and the number of +ions in it by X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)ndt; these ions will reach the plate, the outer +layers will receive fresh ions until the middle one disappears, which +it will do after a time l/X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>), where l is the thickness of the +slab ab of ionized gas; hence N, the number of ions reaching either +plate, is given by the equation</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">N = <span class="f200">∫</span><span class="su1">0</span><span class="sp1">l/X(k1+k2)</span></td> + <td>n<span class="su">0</span>X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)</td> + <td rowspan="2">dt =</td> <td>X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)</td> + <td rowspan="2">log <span class="f250">(</span>1 +</td> <td>n<span class="su">0</span>αl</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">1 + n<span class="su">0</span>αt</td> + <td class="denom">α</td> + <td class="denom">X(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If Q is the charge received by the plate,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">Q = Ne =</td> <td>X</td> <td rowspan="2">log<span class="f250">(</span>1 +</td> + <td>Q<span class="su">0</span>ε</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>,</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">4πε</td> <td class="denom">4πX</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where Q<span class="su">0</span> = n<span class="su">0</span>le is the charge received by the plate when the electric +force is large enough to prevent recombination, and ε = α4πe(R<span class="su">1</span> + R<span class="su">2</span>). +We can from this result deduce the value of ε and hence the value +of α when R<span class="su">1</span> + R<span class="su">2</span> is known.</p> + +<p><i>Distribution of Electric Force when a Current is passing through an +Ionized Gas.</i>—Let the two plates be at right angles to the axis of x; +then we may suppose that between the plates the electric intensity +X is everywhere parallel to the axis of x. The velocities of both the +positive and negative ions are assumed to be proportional to X. Let +k<span class="su">1</span>X, k<span class="su">2</span>X represent these velocities respectively; let n<span class="su">1</span>, n<span class="su">2</span> be respectively +the number of positive and negative ions per unit volume at +a point fixed by the co-ordinate x; let q be the number of positive +or negative ions produced in unit time per unit volume at this +point; and let the number of ions which recombine in unit volume +in unit time be αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>; then if e is the charge on the ion, the volume +density of the electrification is (n<span class="su">1</span> − n<span class="su">2</span>)e, hence</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td>dX</td> <td rowspan="2">= 4π(n<span class="su">1</span> − n<span class="su">2</span>)e   (1).</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If I is the current through unit area of the gas and if we neglect +any diffusion except that caused by the electric field,</p> + +<p class="center1">n<span class="su">1</span>ek<span class="su">1</span>X + n<span class="su">2</span>ek<span class="su">2</span>X = I   (2).</p> + +<p class="noind">From equations (1) and (2) we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">n<span class="su">1</span>e =</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>I</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dX</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>   (3),</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">X</td> + <td class="denom">4π</td> <td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">n<span class="su">1</span>e =</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>I</td> <td rowspan="2">-</td> <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dX</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>   (4),</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">X</td> + <td class="denom">4π</td> <td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">and from these equations we can, if we know the distribution of +electric intensity between the plates, calculate the number of positive +and negative ions.</p> + +<p>In a steady state the number of positive and negative ions in +unit volume at a given place remains constant, hence neglecting +the loss by diffusion, we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(k<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">1</span>X) = q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>   (5).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">-</td> <td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(k<span class="su">2</span>n<span class="su">2</span>X) = q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>   (6).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If k<span class="su">1</span> and k<span class="su">2</span> are constant, we have from (1), (5) and (6)</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d²X²</td> <td rowspan="2">= 8πe(q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>   (7).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx²</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">an equation which is very useful, <span class="correction" title="amended from becaus">because</span> it enables us, if we know +the distribution of X², to find whether at any point in the gas +the ionization is greater or less than the recombination of the ions. +We see that q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>, which is the excess of ionization over recombination, +is proportional to d²X²/dx². Thus when the ionization +exceeds the recombination, <i>i.e.</i> when q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span> is positive, the curve +for X² is convex to the axis of x, while when the recombination +exceeds the ionization the curve for X² will be concave to the axis of x. +Thus, for example, fig. 11 represents the curve for X² observed by +Graham (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 64, p. 49) in a tube through which a steady +current is passing. Interpreting it by equation (7), we infer that +ionization was much in excess of recombination at A and B, slightly +so along C, while along D the recombination exceeded the ionization. +Substituting in equation (7) the values of n<span class="su">1</span>, n<span class="su">2</span> given in (3), (4), +we get</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d²X²</td> <td rowspan="2">8πe<span class="f250">[</span>q -</td> + <td>α</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span>I +</td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dX²</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)(</span>I -</td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dX²</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)](</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>  (8).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx²</td> <td class="denom">e²X²(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)²</td> + <td class="denom">8π</td> <td class="denom">dx</td> <td class="denom">8π</td> <td class="denom">dx</td> + <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:422px; height:262px" src="images/img871.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 11.</td></tr></table> + +<p>This equation can be solved (see Thomson, <i>Phil. Mag.</i> xlvii. +P. 253), when q is constant and k<span class="su">1</span> = k<span class="su">2</span>. From the solution it appears +that if X<span class="su">1</span> be the value of x close to one of the plates, and X<span class="su">0</span> the +value midway between them,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X<span class="su">1</span>/X<span class="su">0</span> =</td> <td>1</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">β<span class="sp">2</span> − 2/β</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where β = 8πek<span class="su">1</span>/α.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page872" id="page872"></a>872</span></p> + +<p>Since e = 4×10<span class="sp">-10</span>, α = 2×10<span class="sp">-6</span>, and k<span class="su">1</span> for air at atmospheric +pressure = 450, β is about 2.3 for air at atmospheric pressure and it +becomes much greater at lower pressures.</p> + +<p>Thus X<span class="su">1</span>/X<span class="su">0</span> is always greater than unity, and the value of the +ratio increases from unity to infinity as β increases from zero to +infinity. As β does not involve either q or I, the ratio of X<span class="su">1</span> to X<span class="su">0</span> +is independent of the strength of the current and of the intensity +of the ionization.</p> + +<p>No general solution of equation (8) has been found when k<span class="su">1</span> is +not equal to k<span class="su">2</span>, but we can get an approximation to the solution +when q is constant. The equations (1), (2), (3), (4) are satisfied +by the values—</p> + +<p class="center1">n<span class="su">1</span> = n<span class="su">2</span> = (q/α)<span class="sp">1/2</span></p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">k<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">1</span>Xe =</td> + <td>k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td rowspan="2">I,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">k<span class="su">2</span>n<span class="su">2</span>Xe =</td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2">I,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X =<span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>α</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span></td> + <td>I</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">q</td> <td class="denom">e(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">These solutions cannot, however, hold right up to the surface of +the plates, for across each unit of area, at a point P, k<span class="su">1</span>I/(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)e +positive ions pass in unit time, and these must all come from the +region between P and the positive plate. If λ is the distance of P +from this plate, this region cannot furnish more than qλ positive +ions, and only this number if there are no recombinations. Hence +the solution cannot hold when qλ is less than k<span class="su">1</span>I/(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)e, or where +λ is less than k<span class="su">1</span>I/(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)qe.</p> + +<p>Similarly the solution cannot hold nearer to the negative plate +than the distance k<span class="su">2</span>I/(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)qe.</p> + +<p>The force in these layers will be greater than that in the middle +of the gas, and so the loss of ions by recombination will be smaller +in comparison with the loss due to the removal of the ions by the +current. If we assume that in these layers the loss of ions by +recombination can be neglected, we can by the method of the +next article find an expression for the value of the electric force at +any point in the layer. This, in conjunction with the value +X<span class="su">0</span> = (α/q)<span class="sp">1/2</span> · I/e(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>) +for the gas outside the layer, will give the value +of X at any point between the plates. It follows from this investigation +that if X<span class="su">1</span> and X<span class="su">2</span> are the values of X at the positive and negative +plates respectively, and X<span class="su">0</span> the value of X outside the layer,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X<span class="su">1</span> = X<span class="su">0</span><span class="f250">(</span>1 +</td> + <td>k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span>, </td> + <td rowspan="2">X<span class="su">2</span> = X<span class="su">0</span><span class="f250">(</span>1 +</td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span>,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">ε</td> + <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td class="denom">ε</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where ε = α/4πe(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>). Langevin found that for air at a pressure +of 152 mm. ε = 0.01, at 375 mm. ε = 0.06, and at 760 mm. ε = 0.27. +Thus at fairly low pressures 1/ε is large, and we have approximately</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X<span class="su">1</span> = X<span class="su">0</span><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">, </td> + <td rowspan="2">X<span class="su">2</span> = X<span class="su">0</span><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">√ε</td> + <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td class="denom">√ε</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Therefore</p> + +<p class="center1">X<span class="su">1</span>/X<span class="su">2</span> = k<span class="su">1</span>/k<span class="su">2</span>,</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 330px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:282px; height:457px" src="images/img872.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 12.</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or the force at the positive plate is to that at the negative plate as +the velocity of the positive ion is to that of the negative ion. Thus +the force at the negative plate +is greater than that at the positive. +The falls of potential +V<span class="su">1</span>, V<span class="su">2</span> at the two layers when +1/ε is large can be shown to be +given by the equations</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V<span class="su">1</span> = 8π²<span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>ε</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">3/2</span>k<span class="su">1</span><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span>i²,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">qα</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V<span class="su">2</span> = 8π²<span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>ε</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">3/2</span>k<span class="su">2</span><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span>i²,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">qα</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">hence</p> + +<p class="center1">V<span class="su">1</span>/V<span class="su">2</span> = k<span class="su">1</span>²/k<span class="su">2</span>²,</p> + +<p class="noind">so that the potential falls at the +electrodes are proportional to +the squares of the velocities +of the ions. The change in +potential across the layers is +proportional to the square of +the current, while the potential +change between the layers is +proportional to the current, +the total potential difference +between the plates is the sum +of these changes, hence the +relation between V and i will +be of the form</p> + +<p class="center1">V = Ai + Bi².</p> + +<p>Mie (<i>Ann. der. Phys.</i>, 1904, +13, P. 857) has by the method +of successive approximations obtained solutions of equation (8) (i.) +when the current is only a small fraction of the saturation current, +(ii.) when the current is nearly saturated. The results of his investigations +are represented in fig. 12, which represents the distribution of +electric force along the path of the current for various values of the +current expressed as fractions of the saturation current. It will +be seen that until the current amounts to about one-fifth of the +maximum current, the type of solution is the one just indicated, <i>i.e.</i> +the electric force is constant except in the neighbourhood of the electrodes +when it increases rapidly.</p> + +<p>Though we are unable to obtain a general solution of the equation +(8), there are some very important special cases in which that +equation can be solved without difficulty. We shall consider two +of these, the first being that when the current is saturated. In this +case there is no loss of ions by recombination, so that using the same +notation as before we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(n<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">1</span>X) = q,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(n<span class="su">2</span>k<span class="su">2</span>X) = -q.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">The solutions of which if q is constant are</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcl">n<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">1</span>X = qx,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">n<span class="su">2</span>k<span class="su">2</span>X = I/e − qx = q(l − x),</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">if l is the distance between the plates, and x = 0 at the positive +electrode. Since</p> + +<p class="center1">dX/dx = 4π(n<span class="su">1</span> − n<span class="su">2</span>)e,</p> + +<p class="noind">we get</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>dX²</td> + <td rowspan="2">= qx<span class="f250">{</span></td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">}</span>- q</td> <td>l</td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">8π</td> <td class="denom">d²x</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> + <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>X²</td> <td rowspan="2">= q</td> <td>x²</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>- q</td> + <td>lx</td> <td rowspan="2">+ C,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">8π</td> <td class="denom">2</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> + <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where C is a quantity to be determined by the condition that +<span class="f150">∫</span><span class="sp1">l</span><span class="su1">0</span> Xdx = V, +where V is the given potential difference between the +plates. When the force is a minimum dX/dx = 0, hence at this point</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">x =</td> <td>l k<span class="su">1</span></td> + <td rowspan="2">,  l − x =</td> <td>l k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Hence the ratio of the distances of this point from the positive and +negative plates respectively is equal to the ratio of the velocities of +the positive and negative ions.</p> + +<p>The other case we shall consider is the very important one in +which the velocity of the negative ion is exceedingly large compared +with the positive; this is the case in flames where, as Gold (<i>Proc. +Roy. Soc.</i> 97, p. 43) has shown, the velocity of the negative ion is +many thousand times the velocity of the positive; it is also very +probably the case in all gases when the pressure is low. We may get +the solution of this case either by putting k<span class="su">1</span>/k<span class="su">2</span> = 0 in equation (8), +or independently as follows:—Using the same notation as before, +we have</p> + +<p class="center1">i = n<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">1</span>Xe + n<span class="su">2</span>k<span class="su">2</span>Xe,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(n<span class="su">2</span>k<span class="su">2</span>X) = q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>dX</td> <td rowspan="2">= 4π (n<span class="su">1</span> − n<span class="su">2</span>)e.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">In this case practically all the current is carried by the negative +ions so that i = n<span class="su">2</span>k<span class="su">2</span>Xe, and therefore q = αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>.</p> + +<p class="noind">Thus</p> + +<p class="center1">n<span class="su">2</span> = i/k<span class="su">2</span>Xe,  n<span class="su">1</span> = qk<span class="su">2</span>Xe/αi.</p> + +<p class="noind">Thus</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>dX</td> <td rowspan="2">=</td> + <td>4πe²k<span class="su">2</span>qX</td> <td rowspan="2">-</td> + <td>4πi</td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td> <td class="denom">αi</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span>X</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>dX²</td> <td rowspan="2">-</td> + <td>8πe²k<span class="su">2</span>qX²</td> <td rowspan="2">= -</td> + <td>8πi</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td> <td class="denom">αi</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">The solution of this equation is</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X² =</td> <td>α</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>i²</td> + <td rowspan="2">+ Cε <span class="sp">8πe² k2qx/αi</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">q</td> <td class="denom">k²<span class="su">2</span>e²</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Here x is measured from the positive electrode; it is more convenient +in this case, however, to measure it from the negative electrode. +If x be the distance from the negative electrode at which the electric +force is X, we have from equation (7)</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X² =</td> <td>α</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>i²</td> + <td rowspan="2">+ C¹ε <span class="sp">8πe² k2qx/αi</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">q</td> <td class="denom">k²<span class="su">2</span>e²</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">To find the value of C¹ we see by equation (7) that</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d²X²</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>k<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span></td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">= q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>;</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dX²</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="denom">8πe</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">hence</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">[</span></td> <td>dX²</td> <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>k<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span></td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">]</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">x1</span> = + <span class="f200">∫</span><span class="sp1">x1</span><span class="su1">0</span> + (q − αn<span class="su">1</span>n<span class="su">2</span>)dx.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dX</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> + <td class="denom">8πe</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">The right hand side of this equation is the excess of ionization +over recombination in the region extending from the cathode to x<span class="su">1</span>; +it must therefore, when things are in a steady state, equal the excess +of the number of negative ions which leave this region over those +which enter it. The number which leave is i/e and the number which +enter is i<span class="su">0</span>/e, if it is the current of negative ions coming from unit area +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page873" id="page873"></a>873</span> +of the cathode, as hot metal cathodes emit large quantities of +negative electricity i<span class="su">0</span> may in some cases be considerable, thus the +right hand side of equation is (i − i<span class="su">0</span>)/e. When x<span class="su">1</span> is large dX²/dx = 0; +hence we have from equation</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">C¹ =</td> <td>αi(i − i<span class="su">0</span>)</td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span></td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">qk<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span>e²</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">2</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">and since k<span class="su">1</span> is small compared with k<span class="su">2</span>, we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X² =</td> <td>α i²</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span>1 +</td> <td>k<span class="su">2</span></td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>i − i<span class="su">0</span></td> + <td rowspan="2">ε <span class="sp">-8πe² k2 · qx/α · i</span> + <span class="f250">)</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">qk²<span class="su1">2</span> e²</td> <td class="denom">k<span class="su">1</span></td> <td class="denom">i</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">From the values which have been found for k<span class="su">2</span> and α, we know that +8πek<span class="su">2</span>/α is a large quantity, hence the second term inside the bracket +will be very small when eqx is equal to or greater than i; thus this +term will be very small outside a layer of gas next the cathode of +such thickness that the number of ions produced on it would be +sufficient, if they were all utilized for the purpose, to carry the +current; in the case of flames this layer is exceedingly thin unless +the current is very large. The value of the electric force in the +uniform part of the field is equal to i/k<span class="su">2</span>e · √<span class="ov">a/q</span>, while when i<span class="su">0</span> = 0, +the force at the cathode itself bears to the uniform force the ratio of +(k<span class="su">1</span> + k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">1/2</span> to k<span class="su">1</span><span class="sp">1/2</span>. As k<span class="su">1</span> is many thousand times k<span class="su">2</span> the force increases +with great rapidity as we approach the cathode; this is a very +characteristic feature of the passage of electricity through flames +and hot gases. Thus in an experiment made by H. A. Wilson with a +flame 18 cm. long, the drop of potential within 1 centimetre of the +cathode was about five times the drop in the other 17 cm. of the tube. +The relation between the current and the potential difference when +the velocity of the negative ion is much greater than the positive is +very easily obtained. Since the force is uniform and equal to i/k<span class="su">2</span>e · √<span class="ov">a/q</span>, +until we get close to the cathode the fall of potential in this part +of the discharge will be very approximately equal to i/k<span class="su">2</span>e · √<span class="ov">(a/q) l</span>, +where l is the distance between the electrodes. Close to the cathode, +the electric force when i<span class="su">0</span> is not nearly equal to i is approximately +given by the equation</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">X =</td> <td>i</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>α</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span> + ε <span class="sp">−4π e²k2 qx / αi</span>,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">e(k<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">1/2</span></td> <td class="denom">q</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">and the fall of potential at the cathode is equal approximately to +<span class="f150">∫</span><span class="sp1">∞</span><span class="su1">0</span> Xdx, +that is to</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>i</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span></td> + <td>α</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span></td> + <td>α i</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">e(k<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span>)<span class="sp">1/2</span></td> <td class="denom">q</td> + <td class="denom">4πe²k<span class="su">2</span>q</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">The potential difference between the plates is the sum of the fall of +potential in the uniform part of the discharge plus the fall at the +cathode, hence</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V =<span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>α</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">1/2</span></td> <td>i</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">(</span>il +</td> <td>i α²</td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">)</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">q</td> <td class="denom">ek<span class="su">2</span></td> + <td class="denom">4πe²q</td> <td class="denom">√(k<span class="su">1</span>k<span class="su">2</span>)</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">The fall of potential at the cathode is proportional to the square of +the current, while the fall in the rest of the circuit is directly proportional +to the current. In the case of flames or hot gases, the fall +of potential at the cathode is much greater than that in the rest of the +circuit, so that in such cases the current through the gas varies nearly +as the square root of the potential difference. The equation we have +just obtained is of the form</p> + +<p class="center1">V = Ai + Bi²,</p> + +<p class="noind">and H. A. Wilson has shown that a relation of this form represents +the results of his experiments on the conduction of electricity through +flames.</p> + +<p>The expression for the fall of potential at the cathode is inversely +proportional to q<span class="sp">3/2</span>, q being the number of ions produced per cubic +centimetre per second close to the cathode; thus any increase in +the ionization at the cathode will diminish the potential fall at the +cathode, and as practically the whole potential difference between +the electrodes occurs at the cathode, a diminution in the potential +fall there will be much more important than a diminution in the +electric force in the uniform part of the discharge, when the force is +comparatively insignificant. This consideration explains a very +striking phenomenon discovered many years ago by Hittorf, who +found that if he put a wire carrying a bead of a volatile salt into the +flame, it produced little effect upon the current, unless it were placed +close to the cathode where it gave rise to an enormous increase in +the current, sometimes increasing the current more than a hundredfold. +The introduction of the salt increases very largely the number +of ions produced, so that q is much greater for a salted flame than +for a plain one. Thus Hittorf’s result coincides with the conclusions +we have drawn from the theory of this class of conduction.</p> + +<p>The fall of potential at the cathode is proportional to i − i<span class="su">0</span>, +where i<span class="su">0</span> is the stream of negative electricity which comes from the +cathode itself, thus as i<span class="su">0</span> increases the fall of potential at the cathode +diminishes and the current sent by a given potential difference +through the gas increases. Now all metals give out negative particles +when heated, at a rate which increases very rapidly with the temperature, +but at the same temperature some metals give out more than +others. If the cathode is made of a metal which emits large quantities +of negative particles, (i − i<span class="su">0</span>) will for a given value of i be smaller +than if the metal only emitted a small number of particles; thus the +cathode fall will be smaller for the metal with the greater emissitivity, +and the relation between the potential difference and the current +will be different in the two cases. These considerations are confirmed +by experience, for it has been found that the current between +electrodes immersed in a flame depends to a great extent upon the +metal of which the electrodes are made. Thus Pettinelli (<i>Acc. dei +Lincei</i> [5], v. p. 118) found that, <i>ceteris paribus</i>, the current between +two carbon electrodes was about 500 times that between two iron +ones. If one electrode was carbon and the other iron, the current +when the carbon was cathode and the iron anode was more than +100 times the current when the electrodes were reversed. The +emission of negative particles by some metallic oxides, notably +those of calcium and barium, has been shown by Wehnelt (<i>Ann. der +Phys.</i> 11, p. 425) to be far greater than that of any known metal, +and the increase of current produced by coating the cathodes with +these oxides is exceedingly large; in some cases investigated by +Tufts and Stark (<i>Physik. Zeits.</i>, 1908, 5, p. 248) the current was +increased many thousand times by coating the cathode with lime. +No appreciable effect is produced by putting lime on the anode.</p> + +<p><i>Conduction when all the Ions are of one Sign.</i>—There are many +important cases in which the ions producing the current come from +one electrode or from a thin layer of gas close to the electrode, no +ionization occurring in the body of the gas or at the other electrode. +Among such cases may be mentioned those where one of the electrodes +is raised to incandescence while the other is cold, or when the +negative electrode is exposed to ultra-violet light. In such cases if +the electrode at which the ionization occurs is the positive electrode, +all the ions will be positively charged, while if it is the negative +electrode the ions will all be charged negatively. The theory of +this case is exceedingly simple. Suppose the electrodes are parallel +planes at right angles to the axis of x; let X be the electric force +at a distance x from the electrode where the ionization occurs, n +the number of ions (all of which are of one sign) at this place per +cubic centimetre, k the velocity of the ion under unit electric force, +e the charge on an ion, and i the current per unit area of the electrode. +Then we have dX/dx = 4πne, and if u is the velocity of the ion +neu = i. But u = kX, hence we have kX/4π · dX/dx = i, and since the right +hand side of this equation does not depend upon x, we get kX²/8π += ix + C, where C is a constant to be determined. If l is the distance +between the plates, and V the potential difference between them,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V =<span class="f250">∫</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">l</span> + <span class="su1" style="margin-left: -1em;">0</span> Xdx =</td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">√</span></td> <td>8π</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">[</span>(il + C)<span class="sp">3/2</span> − C<span class="sp">3/2</span> + <span class="f250">]</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">i</td> <td class="denom">k</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">We shall show that when the current is far below the saturation +value, C is very small compared with il, so that the preceding +equation becomes</p> + +<p class="center1">V² = 8πl³ i/k   (1).</p> + +<p class="noind">To show that for small currents C is small compared with il, consider +the case when the ionization is confined to a thin layer, thickness d +close to the electrode, in that layer let n<span class="su">0</span> be the value of n, then +we have q = αn<span class="su">0</span>² + i/ed. If X<span class="su">0</span> be the value of X when x = 0, +kX<span class="su">0</span>n<span class="su">0</span>e = i, and,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">C =</td> <td>kX<span class="su">0</span>²</td> + <td rowspan="2">=</td> <td>i²</td> + <td rowspan="2">=</td> <td>α</td> + <td rowspan="2">·</td> <td>i²</td> <td rowspan="2">  (2).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">8π</td> <td class="denom">n<span class="su">0</span>²ke·8π</td> + <td class="denom">8πke²</td> <td class="denom">q + i/ed</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Since α/8πke is, as we have seen, less than unity, C will be small +compared with il, if i/(eq + i/d) is small compared with l. If I<span class="su">0</span> is +the saturation current, q = I<span class="su">0</span>/ed, so that the former expression += id/(I<span class="su">0</span> + i), if i is small compared with I<span class="su">0</span>, this expression is small +compared with d, and therefore <i>a fortiori</i> compared with l, so that we +are justified in this case in using equation (1).</p> + +<p>From equation (2) we see that the current increases as the square +of the potential difference. Here an increase in the potential +difference produces a much greater percentage increase than in +conduction through metals, where the current is proportional to the +potential difference. When the ionization is distributed through +the gas, we have seen that the current is approximately proportional +to the square root of the potential, and so increases more slowly +with the potential difference than currents through metals. From +equation (1) the current is inversely proportional to the cube of the +distance between the electrodes, so that it falls off with great rapidity +as this distance is increased. We may note that for a given +potential difference the expression for the current does not involve q, +the rate of production of the ions at the electrode, in other words, +if we vary the ionization the current will not begin to be affected +by the strength of the ionization until this falls so low that the current +is a considerable fraction of the saturation current. For the same +potential difference the current is proportional to k, the velocity +under unit electric force of the ion which carries the current. As the +velocity of the negative ion is greater than that of the positive, +the current when the ionization is confined to the neighbourhood of +one of the electrodes will be greater when that electrode is made +cathode than when it is anode. Thus the current will appear to +pass more easily in one direction than in the opposite.</p> + +<p>Since the ions which carry the current have to travel all the way +from one electrode to the other, any obstacle which is impervious +to these ions will, if placed between the electrodes, stop the current +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page874" id="page874"></a>874</span> +to the electrode where there is no ionization. A plate of metal will +be as effectual as one made of a non-conductor, and thus we get the +remarkable result that by interposing a plate of an excellent conductor +like copper or silver between the electrode, we can entirely +stop the current. This experiment can easily be tried by using a +hot plate as the electrode at which the ionization takes place: then +if the other electrode is cold the current which passes when the hot +plate is cathode can be entirely stopped by interposing a cold metal +plate between the electrodes.</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Methods of counting the Number of Ions.</i>—The detection of the +ions and the estimation of their number in a given volume is +much facilitated by the property they possess of promoting the +condensation of water-drops in dust-free air supersaturated with +water vapour. If such air contains no ions, then it requires about +an eightfold supersaturation before any water-drops are formed; +if, however, ions are present C. T. R. Wilson (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> +189, p. 265) has shown that a sixfold supersaturation is sufficient +to cause the water vapour to condense round the ions and to fall +down as raindrops. The absence of the drops when no ions +are present is due to the curvature of the drop combined with the +surface tension causing, as Lord Kelvin showed, the evaporation +from a small drop to be exceeding rapid, so that even if a drop of +water were formed the evaporation would be so great in its early +stages that it would rapidly evaporate and disappear. It has +been shown, however (J. J. Thomson, <i>Application of Dynamics +to Physics and Chemistry</i>, p. 164; <i>Conduction of Electricity +through Gases</i>, 2nd ed. p. 179), that if a drop of water is charged +with electricity the effect of the charge is to diminish the evaporation; +if the drop is below a certain size the effect the charge has +in promoting condensation more than counterbalances the effect +of the surface tension in promoting evaporation. Thus the electric +charge protects the drop in the most critical period of its growth. +The effect is easily shown experimentally by taking a bulb connected +with a piston arranged so as to move with great rapidity. +When the piston moves so as to increase the volume of the air +contained in the bulb the air is cooled by expansion, and if it was +saturated with water vapour before it is supersaturated after the +expansion. By altering the throw of the piston the amount of +supersaturation can be adjusted within very wide limits. Let +it be adjusted so that the expansion produces about a sixfold +supersaturation; then if the gas is not exposed to any ionizing +agents very few drops (and these probably due to the small +amount of ionization which we have seen is always present in +gases) are formed. If, however, the bulb is exposed to strong +Röntgen rays expansion produces a dense cloud which gradually +falls down and disappears. If the gas in the bulb at the time of +its exposure to the Röntgen rays is subject to a strong electric +field hardly any cloud is formed when the gas is suddenly +expanded. The electric field removes the charged ions from the +gas as soon as they are formed so that the number of ions present +is greatly reduced. This experiment furnishes a very direct +proof that the drops of water which form the cloud are only +formed round the ions.</p> + +<p>This method gives us an exceedingly delicate test for the +presence of ions, for there is no difficulty in detecting ten or so +raindrops per cubic centimetre; we are thus able to detect the +presence of this number of ions. This result illustrates the enormous +difference between the delicacy of the methods of detecting +ions and those for detecting uncharged molecules; we have seen +that we can easily detect ten ions per cubic centimetre, but there +is no known method, spectroscopic or chemical, which would +enable us to detect a billion (10<span class="sp">12</span>) times this number of uncharged +molecules. The formation of the water-drops round the charged +ions gives us a means of counting the number of ions present +in a cubic centimetre of gas; we cool the gas by sudden expansion +until the supersaturation produced by the cooling is sufficient +to cause a cloud to be formed round the ions, and the problem +of finding the number of ions per cubic centimetre of gas is thus +reduced to that of finding the number of drops per cubic centimetre +in the cloud. Unless the drops are very few and far between +we cannot do this by direct counting; we can, however, arrive +at the result in the following way. From the amount of expansion +of the gas we can calculate the lowering produced in its +temperature and hence the total quantity of water precipitated. +The water is precipitated as drops, and if all the drops are the +same size the number per cubic centimetre will be equal to the +volume of water deposited per cubic centimetre, divided by the +volume of one of the drops. Hence we can calculate the number +of drops if we know their size, and this can be determined by +measuring the velocity with which they fall under gravity through +the air.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The theory of the fall of a heavy drop of water through a viscous +fluid shows that v = <span class="spp">2</span>⁄<span class="suu">9</span>ga²/μ, where a is the radius of the drop, g the +acceleration due to gravity, and μ the coefficient of viscosity of the +gas through which the drop falls. Hence if we know v we can deduce +the value of a and hence the volume of each drop and the number +of drops.</p> + +<p><i>Charge on Ion.</i>—By this method we can determine the number of +ions per unit volume of an ionized gas. Knowing this number we +can proceed to determine the charge on an ion. To do this let us +apply an electric force so as to send a current of electricity through +the gas, taking care that the current is only a small fraction of the +saturating current. Then if u is the sum of the velocities of the +positive and negative ions produced in the electric field applied to +the gas, the current through unit area of the gas is neu, where n is +the number of positive or negative ions per cubic centimetre, and e +the charge on an ion. We can easily measure the current through +the gas and thus determine neu; we can determine n by the method +just described, and u, the velocity of the ions under the given +electric field, is known from the experiments of Zeleny and others. +Thus since the product neu, and two of the factors n, u are known, +we can determine the other factor e, the charge on the ion. This +method was used by J. J. Thomson, and details of the method +will be found in <i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 46, p. 528; [5], 48, p. 547; [6], 5, +p. 346. The result of these measurements shows that the charge +on the ion is the same whether the ionization is by Röntgen rays or +by the influence of ultra-violet light on a metal plate. It is the +same whether the gas ionized is hydrogen, air or carbonic acid, +and thus is presumably independent of the nature of the gas. The +value of e formed by this method was 3.4×10<span class="sp">-10</span> electrostatic units.</p> + +<p>H. A. Wilson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 5, p. 429) used another method. +Drops of water, as we have seen, condense more easily on negative +than on positive ions. It is possible, therefore, to adjust the expansion +so that a cloud is formed on the negative but not on the +positive ions. Wilson arranged the experiments so that such a cloud +was formed between two horizontal plates which could be maintained +at different potentials. The charged drops between the plates were +acted upon by a uniform vertical force which affected their rate of +fall. Let X be the vertical electric force, e the charge on the drop, +v<span class="su">1</span> the rate of fall of the drop when this force acts, and v the rate of +fall due to gravity alone. Then since the rate of fall is proportionate +to the force on the drop, if a is the radius of the drop, and ρ its +density, then</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>Xe + <span class="spp">4</span>⁄<span class="suu">3</span>πρ ga³</td> <td rowspan="2">=</td> + <td>v<span class="su">1</span></td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom"><span class="spp">4</span>⁄<span class="suu">3</span>π ρga³</td> <td class="denom">v</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<p class="center1">Xe = <span class="spp">4</span>⁄<span class="suu">3</span>π ρga³ (v<span class="su">1</span> − v)/v.</p> + +<p class="noind">But</p> + +<p class="center1">v = <span class="spp">2</span>⁄<span class="suu">9</span>ga²ρ/μ,</p> + +<p class="noind">so that</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">Xe = √ 2 · 9π<span class="f250">√</span></td> <td>μ<span class="sp1">3</span></td> + <td rowspan="2">·</td> <td>v<span class="sp1">3</span><span class="su1">2</span>(v<span class="su">1</span> − v)</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">g ρ</td> <td class="denom">v</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Thus if X, v, v<span class="su">1</span> are known e can be determined. Wilson by this +method found that e was 3.1×10<span class="sp">-10</span> electrostatic units. A few of +the ions carried charges 2e or 3e.</p> + +<p>Townsend has used the following method to compare the charge +carried by a gaseous ion with that carried by an atom of hydrogen +in the electrolysis of solution. We have</p> + +<p class="center1">u/D = Ne/Π,</p> + +<p class="noind">where D is the coefficient of diffusion of the ions through the gas, +u the velocity of the ion in the same gas when acted on by unit +electric force, N the number of molecules in a cubic centimetre of +the gas when the pressure is Π dynes per square centimetre, and e the +charge in electrostatic units. This relation is obtained on the +hypothesis that N ions in a cubic centimetre produce the same +pressure as N uncharged molecules.</p> + +<p>We know the value of D from Townsend’s experiments and the +values of u from those of Zeleny. We get the following values for +Ne×10<span class="sp">-10</span>:—</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Gas.</td> + <td class="tccm allb" colspan="2">Moist Gas.</td> <td class="tccm allb" colspan="2">Moist Gas.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Positive<br />Ions.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Positive<br />Ions.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Positive<br />Ions.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Positive<br />Ions.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.28</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.29</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.46</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.31</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Oxygen</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.34</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.27</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.63</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.36</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Carbonic acid</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.01</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .87</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .99</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .93</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Hydrogen</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.24</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.18</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.63</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.25</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb bb">Mean</td> <td class="tcc allb">1.22</td> <td class="tcc allb">1.15</td> <td class="tcc allb">1.43</td> <td class="tcc allb">1.21</td></tr> +</table> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page875" id="page875"></a>875</span></p> + +<p>Since 1.22 cubic centimetres of hydrogen at the temperature 15° C. +and pressure 760 mm. of mercury are liberated by the passage +through acidulated water of one electromagnetic unit of electricity +or 3×10<span class="sp">10</span> electrostatic units, and since in one cubic centimetre of +the gas there are 2.46 N atoms of hydrogen, we have, if E is the +charge in electrostatic units, on the atom of hydrogen in the electrolysis +of solutions</p> + +<p class="center1">2.46NE = 3×10<span class="sp">10</span>,</p> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<p class="center1">NE = 1.22×10<span class="sp">10</span>.</p> + +<p class="noind">The mean of the values of Ne in the preceding table is 1.24×10<span class="sp">10</span>. +Hence we may conclude that the charge of electricity carried by a +gaseous ion is equal to the charge carried by the hydrogen atom in +the electrolysis of solutions. The values of Ne for the different gases +differ more than we should have expected from the probable accuracy +of the determination of D and the velocity of the ions: Townsend +(<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 80, p. 207) has shown that when the ionization is +produced by Röntgen rays some of the positive ions carry a double +charge and that this accounts for the values of Ne being greater for +the positive than for the negative ions. Since we know the value +of e, viz. 3.5×10<span class="sp">-10</span>, and, also Ne, = 1.24×10<span class="sp">10</span>, we find N the number +of molecules in a cubic centimetre of gas at standard temperature and +pressure to be equal to 3.5×10<span class="sp">19</span>. This method of obtaining N is +the only one which does not involve any assumption as to the shape +of the molecules and the forces acting between them.</p> + +<p>Another method of determining the charge carried by an ion has +been employed by Rutherford (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 81, pp. 141, 162), +in which the positively electrified particles emitted by radium are +made use of. The method consists of: (1) Counting the number of +α particles emitted by a given quantity of radium in a known time. +(2) Measuring the electric charge emitted by this quantity in the +same time. To count the number of the α particles the radium +was so arranged that it shot into an ionization chamber a small +number of α particles per minute; the interval between the emission +of individual particles was several seconds. When an α particle +passed into the vessel it ionized the gas inside and so greatly increased +its conductivity; thus, if the gas were kept exposed to an electric +field, the current through the gas would suddenly increase when an +α particle passed into the vessel. Although each α particle produces +about thirty thousand ions, this is hardly large enough to produce +the conductivity appreciable without the use of very delicate +apparatus; to increase the conductivity Rutherford took advantage +of the fact that ions, especially negative ones, when exposed to a +strong electric field, produce other ions by collision against the +molecules of the gas through which they are moving. By suitably +choosing the electric field and the pressure in the ionization chamber, +the 30,000 ions produced by each α particle can be multiplied to +such an extent that an appreciable current passes through the +ionization chamber on the arrival of each α particle. An electrometer +placed in series with this vessel will show by its deflection when an α +particle enters the chamber, and by counting the number of deflections +per minute we can determine the number of α particles given +out by the radium in that time. Another method of counting this +number is to let the particles fall on a phosphorescent screen, and +count the number of scintillations on the screen in a certain time. +Rutherford has shown that these two methods give concordant +results.</p> + +<p>The charge of positive electricity given out by the radium was +measured by catching the α particles in a Faraday cylinder placed +in a very highly exhausted vessel, and measuring the charge per +minute received by this cylinder. In this way Rutherford showed +that the charge on the α particle was 9.4×10<span class="sp">-10</span> electrostatic units. +Now e/m for the α particle = 5 ×10<span class="sp">3</span>, and there is evidence that the +α particle is a charged atom of helium; since the atomic weight of +helium is 4 and e/m for hydrogen is 10<span class="sp">4</span>, it follows that the charge +on the helium atom is twice that on the hydrogen, so that the charge +on the hydrogen atom is 4.7×10<span class="sp">-10</span> electrostatic units.</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Calculation of the Mass of the Ions at Low Pressures.</i>—Although +at ordinary pressures the ion seems to have a very complex +structure and to be the aggregate of many molecules, yet we have +evidence that at very low pressures the structure of the ion, and +especially of the negative one, becomes very much simpler. +This evidence is afforded by determination of the mass of the +atom. We can measure the ratio of the mass of an ion to the +charge on the ion by observing the deflections produced by magnetic +and electric forces on a moving ion. If an ion carrying a +charge e is moving with a velocity v, at a point where the magnetic +force is H, a mechanical force acts on the ion, whose direction +is at right angles both to the direction of motion of the ion and +to the magnetic force, and whose magnitude is evH sin θ, where +θ is the angle between v and H. Suppose then that we have an +ion moving through a gas whose pressure is so low that the free +path of the ion is long compared with the distance through which +it moves whilst we are experimenting upon it; in this case the +motion of the ion will be free, and will not be affected by the +presence of the gas.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>Since the force is always at right angles to the direction of motion +of the ion, the speed of the ion will not be altered by the action +of this force; and if the ion is projected with a velocity v in a direction +at right angles to the magnetic force, and if the magnetic force is +constant in magnitude and direction, the ion will describe a curve in +a plane at right angles to the magnetic force. If ρ is the radius of +curvature of this curve, m the mass of the ion, mv²/ρ must equal +the normal force acting on the ion, <i>i.e.</i> it must be equal to Hev, or +ρ = mv/He. Thus the radius of curvature is constant; the path is +therefore a circle, and if we can measure the radius of this circle we +know the value of mv/He. In the case of the rapidly moving negative +ions projected from the cathode in a highly exhausted tube, which +are known as <i>cathode rays</i>, the path of the ions can be readily determined +since they make many substances luminous when they +impinge against them. Thus by putting a screen of such a substance +in the path of the rays the shape of the path will be determined. +Let us now suppose that the ion is acted upon by a vertical electric +force X and is free from magnetic force, if it be projected with a +horizontal velocity v, the vertical deflection y after a time t is ½×et²/m, +or if l is the horizontal distance travelled over by the ion in this time +we have since l = vt,</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">y = ½</td> <td>Xe</td> + <td rowspan="2"> </td> <td>l²</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">m</td> <td class="denom">v²</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Thus if we measure y and l we can deduce e/mv². From the effect +of the magnetic force we know e/mv. Combining these results we +can find both e/m and v.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: right; width: 370px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figright1"><img style="width:323px; height:88px" src="images/img875.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 13.</td></tr></table> + +<p>The method by which this determination is carried out in practice +is illustrated in fig. 13. The cathode rays start from the electrode +C in a highly exhausted tube, pass through two small holes in the +plugs A and B, the holes being in the same horizontal line. Thus a +pencil of rays emerging from B is horizontal and produces a bright +spot at the far end of the +tube. In the course of +their journey to the end +of the tube they pass +between the horizontal +plates E and D, by connecting +these plates with +an electric battery a vertical +electric field is produced between E and D and the phosphorescent +spot is deflected. By measuring this deflection we determine +e/mv². The tube is now placed in a uniform magnetic field, the lines +of magnetic force being horizontal and at right angles to the plane +of the paper. The magnetic force makes the rays describe a circle in +the plane of the paper, and by measuring the vertical deflection of +the phosphorescent patch at the end of the tube we can determine +the radius of this circle, and hence the value of e/mv. From the two +observations the value of e/m and v can be calculated.</p> + +<p>Another method of finding e/m for the negative ion which is +applicable in many cases to which the preceding one is not suitable, +is as follows: Let us suppose that the ion starts from rest and moves +in a field where the electric and magnetic forces are both uniform, +the electric force X being parallel to the axis of x, and the magnetic +force Z parallel to the axis of z; then if x, y, are the co-ordinates of +the ion at the time t, the equations of motion of the ion are—</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">m</td> <td>d²x</td> + <td rowspan="2">= Xe − He</td> <td>dy</td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">dt²</td> <td class="denom">dt</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr> <td rowspan="2">m</td> <td>d²y</td> + <td rowspan="2">= He</td> <td>dx</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr> <td class="denom">dt²</td> <td class="denom">dt</td></tr></table> + +<p>The solution of these equations, if x, y, dx/dt, dy/dt all vanish +when t = 0, is</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">x =</td> <td>Xm</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span>1 − cos<span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>e</td> + <td rowspan="2">Ht<span class="f250">)}</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">eH²</td> <td class="denom">m</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">y =</td> <td>Xm</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span></td> <td>e</td> + <td rowspan="2">Ht − sin<span class="f250">(</span></td> <td>e</td> + <td rowspan="2">Ht<span class="f250">)}</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">eH²</td> <td class="denom">m</td> <td class="denom">m</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">These equations show that the path of the ion is a cycloid, the +generating circle of which has a diameter equal to 2Xm/eH², and +rolls on the line x = 0.</p> + +<p>Suppose now that we have a number of ions starting from the +plane x = 0, and moving towards the plane x = a. The particles +starting from x = 0 describe cycloids, and the greatest distance they +can get from the plane is equal to the diameter of the generating +circle of the cycloid, <i>i.e.</i> to 2Xm/eH². (After reaching this distance +they begin to approach the plane.) Hence if a is less than the +diameter of the generating circle, all the particles starting from +x = 0 will reach the plane x = a, if this is unlimited in extent; while +if a is greater than the diameter of the generating circle none of +the particles which start from x = 0 will reach the plane x = a. Thus, +if x = 0 is a plane illuminated by ultra-violet light, and consequently +the seat of a supply of negative ions, and x = a a plane connected +with an electrometer, then if a definite electric intensity is established +between the planes, <i>i.e.</i> if X be fixed, so that the rate of emission of +negative ions from the illuminated plate is given, and if a is less than +2Xm/eH², all the ions which start from x = 0 will reach x = a. That +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page876" id="page876"></a>876</span> +is, the rate at which this plane receives an electric charge will be the +same whether there is a magnetic field between the plate or not, +but if a is greater than 2Xm/eH², then no particle which starts from +the plate x = 0 will reach the plate x = a, and this plate will receive +no charge. Thus the supply of electricity to the plate has been entirely +stopped by the magnetic field. Thus, on this theory, if the +distance between the plates is less than a certain value, the magnetic +force should produce no effect on the rate at which the electrometer +plate receives a charge, while if the distance is greater than this value +the magnetic force would completely stop the supply of electricity +to the plate. The actual phenomena are not so abrupt as this theory +indicates. We find that when the plates are very near together the +magnetic force produces a very slight effect, and this an increase in +the rate of charging of the plate. On increasing the distance we come +to a stage where the magnetic force produces a great diminution in +the rate of charging. It does not, however, stop it abruptly, there +being a considerable range of distance, in which the magnetic force +diminishes but does not destroy the current. At still greater distances +the current to the plate under the magnetic force is quite +inappreciable compared with that when there is no magnetic force. +We should get this gradual instead of abrupt decay of the current +if some of the particles, instead of all starting from rest, started +with a finite velocity; in that case the first particles stopped would +be those which started from rest. This would be when a = 2Xm/eH². +Thus if we measure the value of a when the magnetic force first +begins to affect the leak to the electrometer we determine 2Xm/eH², +and as we can easily measure X and H, we can deduce the value of m/e.</p> +</div> + +<p>By these methods Thomson determined the value of e/m for +the negative ions produced when ultra-violet light falls on a +metal plate, as well as for the negative ions produced by an +incandescent carbon filament in an atmosphere of hydrogen +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 48, p. 547) as well as for the cathode rays. It was +found that the value of e/m for the negative ions was the same +in all these cases, and that it was a constant quantity independent +of the nature of the gas from which the ions are produced and the +means used to produce them. It was found, too, that this value +was more than a thousand times the value of e/M, where e is the +charge carried by an atom of hydrogen in the electrolysis of +solutions, and M the mass of an atom of hydrogen. We have +seen that this charge is the same as that carried by the negative +ion in gases; thus since e/m is more than a thousand times e/M, +it follows that M must be more than a thousand times m. Thus +the mass of the negative ion is exceedingly small compared with +the mass of the atom of hydrogen, the smallest mass recognized in +chemistry. The production of negative ions thus involves the +splitting up of the atom, as from a collection of atoms something +is detached whose mass is less than that of a single atom. It is +important to notice in connexion with this subject that an entirely +different line of argument, based on the Zeeman effect (see <span class="sc"><a href="#artlinks">Magneto-Optics</a></span>), +leads to the recognition of negatively electrified +particles for which e/m is of the same order as that deduced from +the consideration of purely electrical phenomena. These small +negatively electrified particles are called corpuscles. The latest +determinations of e/m for corpuscles available are the following:—</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="width: 70%;" summary="Contents"> + +<tr><td class="tcc">Observer.</td> <td class="tcc">e/m.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl">Classen (<i>Ber. deut. phys. Ges.</i> 6, p. 700)</td> <td class="tcl">1.7728×10<span class="sp">7</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">Bucherer (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i>, 28, p. 513)</td> <td class="tcl">1.763×10<span class="sp">7</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>It follows from electrical theory that when the corpuscles +are moving with a velocity comparable with that of light their +masses increase rapidly with their velocity. This effect has been +detected by Kauffmann (<i>Gött. Nach.</i>, Nov. 8, 1901), who used the +corpuscles shot out from radium, some of which move with +velocities only a few per cent less than that of light. Other +experiments on this point have been made by Bucherer (<i>Ann. der +Phys.</i> 28, p. 513).</p> + +<p><i>Conductivity Produced by Ultra-Violet Light.</i>—So much use has +been made in recent times of ultra-violet light for producing +ions that it is desirable to give some account of the electrical +effects produced by light. The discovery by Hertz (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> +31, p. 983) in 1887, that the incidence of ultra-violet light on a +spark gap facilitates the passage of a spark, led to a series of +investigations by Hallwachs, Hoor, Righi and Stoletow, on the +effect of ultra-violet light on electrified bodies. These researches +have shown that a freshly cleaned metal surface, charged with +negative electricity, rapidly loses its charge, however small, when +exposed to ultra-violet light, and that if the surface is insulated +and without charge initially, it acquires a positive charge under +the influence of the light. The magnitude of this positive charge +may be very much increased by directing a blast of air on the plate. +This, as Zeleny (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 45, p. 272) showed, has the effect +of blowing from the neighbourhood of the plate negatively +electrified gas, which has similar properties to the charged gas +obtained by the separation of ions from a gas exposed to Röntgen +rays or uranium radiation. If the metal plate is positively +electrified, there is no loss of electrification caused by ultra-violet +light. This has been questioned, but a very careful examination +of the question by Elster and Geitel (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 57, p. 24) has +shown that the apparent exceptions are due to the accidental +exposure to reflected ultra-violet light of metal surfaces in the +neighbourhood of the plate negatively electrified by induction, +so that the apparent loss of charge is due to negative electricity +coming up to the plate, and not to positive electricity going away +from it. The ultra-violet light may be obtained from an arc-lamp, +the effectiveness of which is increased if one of the terminals +is made of zinc or aluminium, the light from these substances +being very rich in ultra-violet rays; it may also be got very +conveniently by sparking with an induction coil between zinc +or cadmium terminals. Sunlight is not rich in ultra-violet light, +and does not produce anything like so great an effect as the arc +light. Elster and Geitel, who have investigated with great success +the effects of light on electrified bodies, have shown that the more +electro-positive metals lose negative charges when exposed to +ordinary light, and do not need the presence of the ultra-violet +rays. Thus they found that amalgams of sodium or potassium +enclosed in a glass vessel lose a negative charge when exposed to +daylight, though the glass stops the small amount of ultra-violet +light left in sunlight after its passage through the atmosphere. +If sodium or potassium be employed, or, what is more convenient, +the mercury-like liquid obtained by mixing sodium and potassium +in the proportion of their combining weights, they found that +negative electricity was discharged by an ordinary petroleum +lamp. If the still more electro-positive metal rubidium is used, +the discharge can be produced by the light from a glass rod just +heated to redness; but there is no discharge till the glass is luminous. +Elster and Geitel arrange the metals in the following order +for the facility with which negative electrification is discharged +by light: rubidium, potassium, alloy of sodium and potassium, +sodium, lithium, magnesium, thallium, zinc. With copper, +platinum, lead, iron, cadmium, carbon and mercury the effects +with ordinary light are too small to be appreciable. The order +is the same as that in Volta’s electro-chemical series. With +ultra-violet light the different metals show much smaller differences +in their power of discharging negative electricity than they +do with ordinary light. Elster and Geitel found that the ratio of +the photo-electric effects of two metals exposed to approximately +monochromatic light depended upon the wave-length of the light, +different metals showing a maximum sensitiveness in different +parts of the spectrum. This is shown by the following table for +the alkaline metals. The numbers in the table are the rates of +emission of negative electricity under similar circumstances. The +rate of emission under the light from a petroleum lamp was +taken as unity:—</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="width: 60%;" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcl"> </td> <td class="tcc">Blue.</td> <td class="tcc">Yellow.</td> <td class="tcc">Orange.</td> <td class="tcc">Red.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">Rb</td> <td class="tcc">.16</td> <td class="tcc">.64</td> <td class="tcc">.33</td> <td class="tcc">.039</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">Na</td> <td class="tcc">.37</td> <td class="tcc">.36</td> <td class="tcc">.14</td> <td class="tcc">.009</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl">K</td> <td class="tcc">.57</td> <td class="tcc">.07</td> <td class="tcc">.04</td> <td class="tcc">.002</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">The table shows that the absorption of light by the metal has +great influence on the photo-electric effect, for while potassium +is more sensitive in blue light than sodium, the strong absorption +of yellow light by sodium makes it more than five times more +sensitive to this light than potassium. Stoletow, at an early +period, called attention to the connexion between strong absorption +and photo-electric effects. He showed that water, which +does not absorb to any great extent either the ultra-violet or +visible rays, does not show any photo-electric effect, while +strongly coloured solutions, and especially solutions of fluorescent +substances such as methyl green or methyl violet, do so to a very +considerable extent; indeed, a solution of methyl green is more +sensitive than zinc. Hallwachs (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 37, p. 666) proved +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page877" id="page877"></a>877</span> +that in liquids showing photo-electric effects there is always strong +absorption; we may, however, have absorption without these +effects. Phosphorescent substances, such as calcium sulphide +show this effect, as also do various specimens of fluor-spar. As +phosphorescence and fluorescence are probably accompanied by +a very intense absorption by the surface layers, the evidence is +strong that to get the photo-electric effects we must have strong +absorption of some kind of light, either visible or ultra-violet.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 356px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:306px; height:466px" src="images/img877.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 14.</td></tr></table> + +<p>If a conductor A is placed near a conductor B exposed to ultra-violet +light, and if B is made the negative electrode and a difference +of potential established between A and B, a current of +electricity will flow between the conductors. The relation between +the magnitude of the current and the difference of potential +when A and B are parallel +plates has been investigated +by Stoletow (<i>Journal +de physique</i>, 1890, 11, +p. 469), von Schweidler +(<i>Wien. Ber.</i>, 1899, 108, p. +273) and Varley (<i>Phil. +Trans. A.</i>, 1904, 202, p. +439). The results of some +of Varley’s experiments are +represented in the curves +shown in fig. 14, in which +the ordinates are the currents +and the abscissae the +potentials. It will be seen +that when the pressure is +exceedingly low the current +is independent of the +potential difference and +is equal to the negative +charge carried off in unit +time by the corpuscles +emitted from the surface +exposed to the light. At +higher pressures the current +rises far above these values and increases rapidly with the +potential difference. This is due to the corpuscles emitted by the +illuminated surface acquiring under the electric field such high +velocities that when they strike against the molecules of the gas +through which they are passing they ionize them, producing fresh +ions which can carry on additional current. The relation between +the current and the potential difference in this case is in accordance +with the results of the theory of ionization by collision. +The corpuscles emitted from a body under the action of ultra-violet +light start from the surface with a finite velocity. The +velocity is not the same for all the corpuscles, nor indeed could +we expect that it should be: for as Ladenburg has shown +(<i>Ann. der Phys.</i>, 1903, 12, p. 558) the seat of their emission is not +confined to the surface layer of the illuminated metal but extends +to a layer of finite, though small, thickness. Thus the particles +which start deep down will have to force their way through a +layer of metal before they reach the surface, and in doing so will +have their velocities retarded by an amount depending on the +thickness of this layer. The variation in the velocity of the +corpuscles is shown in the following table, due to Lenard (<i>Ann. +der Phys.</i>, 1902, 8, p. 149).</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="allb"> </td> <td class="tcc allb">Carbon.</td> + <td class="tcc allb">Platinum.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Aluminium.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Corpuscles emitted with velocities</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> between 12 and 8×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm sec.</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.000</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.000</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.004</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> between 8 and 4×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm sec.</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.049</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.155</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.151</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> between 4 and 0×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm sec.</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.67 </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.65 </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.49 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Corpuscles only emitted with the help</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> of an external electric field.</td> <td class="tcc rb">0.28 </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.21 </td> <td class="tcc rb">0.35 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcc allb">1.00 </td> <td class="tcc allb">1.00 </td> <td class="tcc allb">1.00 </td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">If the illuminated surface is completely surrounded by an envelope +of the same metal insulated from and completely shielded from +the light, the emission of the negative corpuscles from the illuminated +surface would go on until the potential difference V +between this surface and the envelope became so great that the +corpuscles with the greatest velocity lost their energy before +reaching the envelope, <i>i.e.</i> if m is the mass, e the charge on a +corpuscle, v the greatest velocity of projection, until Ve = ½mv². +The values found for V by different observers are not very +consistent. Lenard found that V for aluminium was about 3 +volts and for platinum 2. Millikan and Winchester (<i>Phil. +Mag.</i>, July 1907) found for aluminium V = .738. The apparatus +used by them was so complex that the interpretation of their +results is difficult.</p> + +<p>An extremely interesting fact discovered by Lenard is that the +velocity with which the corpuscles are emitted from the metal is +independent of the intensity of the incident light. The quantity +of corpuscles increases with the intensity, but the velocity of the +individual corpuscles does not. It is worthy of notice that in +other cases when negative corpuscles are emitted from metals, +as for example when the metals are exposed to cathode rays, +Canal-strahlen, or Röntgen rays, the velocity of the emitted +corpuscles is independent of the intensity of the primary radiation +which excites them. The velocity is not, however, independent +of the nature of the primary rays. Thus when light is used +to produce the emission of corpuscles the velocity, as Ladenburg +has shown, depends on the wave length of the light, increasing +as the wave length diminishes. The velocity of corpuscles +emitted under the action of cathode rays is greater than that +of those ejected by light, while the incidence of Röntgen rays +produces the emission of corpuscles moving much more rapidly +than those in the cases already mentioned, and the harder the +primary rays the greater is the velocity of the corpuscles.</p> + +<p>The importance of the fact that the velocity and therefore the +energy of the corpuscles emitted from the metal is independent +of the intensity of the incident light can hardly be overestimated. +It raises the most fundamental questions as to the nature of light +and the constitution of the molecules. What is the source of +the energy possessed by these corpuscles? Is it the light, or in the +stores of internal energy possessed by the molecule? Let us +follow the consequences of supposing that the energy comes from +the light. Then, since the energy is independent of the intensity +of the light, the electric forces which liberate the corpuscles must +also be independent of that intensity. But this cannot be the +case if, as is usually assumed in the electromagnetic theory, the +wave front consists of a uniform distribution of electric force +without structure, for in this case the magnitude of the electric +force is proportional to the square root of the intensity. On the +emission theory of light a difficulty of this kind would not arise, +for on that theory the energy in a luminiferous particle remains +constant as the particle pursues its flight through space. Thus any +process which a single particle is able to effect by virtue of its +energy will be done just as well a thousand miles away from the +source of light as at the source itself, though of course in a given +space there will not be nearly so many particles to do this process +far from the source as there are close in. Thus, if one of the +particles when it struck against a piece of metal caused the +ejection of a corpuscle with a given velocity, the velocity of +emission would not depend on the intensity of the light. There +does not seem any reason for believing that the electromagnetic +theory is inconsistent with the idea that on this theory, as on the +emission theory, the energy in the light wave may instead of being +uniformly distributed through space be concentrated in bundles +which occupy only a small fraction of the volume traversed by +the light, and that as the wave travels out the bundles get farther +apart, the energy in each remaining undiminished. Some such +view of the structure of light seems to be required to account for +the fact that when a plate of metal is struck by a wave of ultra-violet +light, it would take years before the corpuscles emitted +from the metal would equal in number the molecules on the +surface of the metal plate, and yet on the ordinary theory of light +each one of these is without interruption exposed to the action of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page878" id="page878"></a>878</span> +the light. The fact discovered by E. Ladenburg (<i>Verh. d. +deutsch. physik. Ges.</i> 9, p. 504) that the velocity with which +the corpuscles are emitted depends on the wave length of the +light suggests that the energy in each bundle depends upon the +wave length and increases as the wave length diminishes.</p> + +<p>These considerations illustrate the evidence afforded by photo-electric +effects on the nature of light; these effects may also +have a deep significance with regard to the structure of matter. +The fact that the energy of the individual corpuscles is independent +of the intensity of the light might be explained by the +hypothesis that the energy of the corpuscles does not come from +the light but from the energy stored up in the molecules of the +metal exposed to the light. We may suppose that under the +action of the light some of the molecules are thrown into an +unstable state and explode, ejecting corpuscles; the light in this +case acts only as a trigger to liberate the energy in the atom, and +it is this energy and not that of the light which goes into the +corpuscles. In this way the velocity of the corpuscles would be +independent of the intensity of the light. But it may be asked, +is this view consistent with the result obtained by Ladenburg +that the velocity of the corpuscles depends upon the nature of +the light? If light of a definite wave length expelled corpuscles +with a definite and uniform velocity, it would be very improbable +that the emission of the corpuscles is due to an explosion of the +atoms. The experimental facts as far as they are known at +present do not allow us to say that the connexion between the +velocity of the corpuscles and the wave length of the light is of +this definite character, and a connexion such as a gradual increase +of average velocity as the wave length of the light diminishes, +would be quite consistent with the view that the corpuscles are +ejected by the explosion of the atom. For in a complex thing like +an atom there may be more than one system which becomes unstable +when exposed to light. Let us suppose that there are +two such systems, A and B, of which B ejects the corpuscles with +the greater velocity. If B is more sensitive to the short waves, +and A to the long ones, then as the wave length of the light +diminishes the proportion of the corpuscles which come from B +will increase, and as these are the faster, the average velocity of +the corpuscles emitted will also increase. And although the +potential acquired by a perfectly insulated piece of metal when +exposed to ultra-violet light would depend only on the velocity +of the fastest corpuscles and not upon their number, in practice +perfect insulation is unattainable, and the potential actually +acquired is determined by the condition that the gain of negative +electricity by the metal through lack of insulation, is equal to the +loss by the emission of negatively electrified corpuscles. The +potential acquired will fall below that corresponding to perfect +insulation by an amount depending on the number of the faster +corpuscles emitted, and the potential will rise if the proportion of +the rapidly moving corpuscles is increased, even though there is +no increase in their velocity. It is interesting to compare other +cases in which corpuscles are emitted with the case of ultra-violet +light. When a metal or gas is bombarded by cathode rays it +emits corpuscles and the velocity of these is found to be independent +of the velocity of the cathode rays which excite them; the +velocity is greater than for corpuscles emitted under ultra-violet +light. Again, when bodies are exposed to Röntgen rays they emit +corpuscles moving with a much greater velocity than those +excited by cathode rays, but again the velocity does not depend +upon the intensity of the rays although it does to some extent +on their hardness. In the case of cathode and Röntgen rays, the +velocity with which the corpuscles are emitted seems, as far as we +know at present, to vary slightly, but only slightly, with the +nature of the substance on which the rays fall. May not this +indicate that the first effect of the primary rays is to detach a +neutral doublet, consisting of a positive and negative charge, +this doublet being the same from whatever system it is detached? +And that the doublet is unstable and explodes, expelling the +negative charge with a high velocity, and the positive one, +having a much larger charge, with a much smaller velocity, +the momentum of the negative charge being equal to that of the +positive.</p> + +<p>Up to now we have been considering the effects produced when +light is incident on metals. Lenard found (and the result has +been confirmed by the experiments of J. J. Thomson and +Lyman) that certain kinds of ultra-violet light ionize a gas +when they pass through. The type of ultra-violet light +which produces this effect is so easily absorbed that it is +stopped by a layer a few millimetres thick of air at atmospheric +pressure.</p> + +<p><i>Ionization by Collision.</i>—When the ionization of the gas is +produced by external agents such as Röntgen rays or ultra-violet +light, the electric field produces a current by setting the +positive ions moving in one direction, and the negative ones in the +opposite; it makes use of ions already made and does not itself +give rise to ionization. In many cases, however, such as in +electric sparks, there are no external agents to produce ionization +and the electric field has to produce the ions as well as set them in +motion. When the ionization is produced by external means the +smallest electric field is able to produce a current through the +gas; when, however, these external means are absent no current +is produced unless the strength of the electric field exceeds a +certain critical value, which depends not merely upon the nature +of the gas but also upon the pressure and the dimensions of +the vessel in which it is contained. The variation of the electric +field required to produce discharge can be completely explained +if we suppose that the ionization of the gas is produced by the +impact with its molecules of corpuscles, and in certain cases of +positive ions, which under the influence of the electric field +have acquired considerable kinetic energy. We have direct +evidence that rapidly moving corpuscles are able to ionize +molecules against which they strike, for the cathode rays consist +of such corpuscles, and these when they pass through a gas +produce large amounts of ionization. Suppose then that we +have in a gas exposed to an electric field a few corpuscles. These +will be set in motion by the field and will acquire an amount +of energy in proportion to the product of the electric force, +their charge, and the distance travelled in the direction of the +electric field between two collisions with the molecules of the +gas. If this energy is sufficient to give them the ionizing property +possessed by cathode rays, then when a corpuscle strikes against +a molecule it will detach another corpuscle; this under the action +of the electric field will acquire enough energy to produce +corpuscles on its own account, and so as the corpuscles move +through the gas their number will increase in geometrical progression. +Thus, though there were but few corpuscles to begin +with, there may be great ionization after these have been +driven some distance through the gas by the electric field.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The number of ions produced by collisions can be calculated by +the following method. Let the electric force be parallel to the axis +of x, and let n be the number of corpuscles per unit volume at a place +fixed by the co-ordinate x; then in unit time these corpuscles will +make nu/λ collisions with the molecules, if u is the velocity of a +corpuscle and λ the mean free path of a corpuscle. When the +corpuscles are moving fast enough to produce ions by collision their +velocities are very much greater than those they would possess at +the same temperature if they were not acted on by electrical force, +and so we may regard the velocities as being parallel to the axis of x +and determined by the electric force and the mean free path of the +corpuscles. We have to consider how many of the nu/λ collisions +which take place per second will produce ions. We should expect +that the ionization of a molecule would require a certain amount of +energy, so that if the energy of the corpuscle fell below this amount +no ionization would take place, while if the energy of the corpuscle +were exceedingly large, every collision would result in ionization. +We shall suppose that a certain fraction of the number of collisions +result in ionization and that this fraction is a function of the energy +possessed by the corpuscle when it collides against the molecules. +This energy is proportional to Xeλ when X is the electric force, +e the charge on the corpuscle, and λ the mean free path. If the +fraction of collisions which produce ionization is ∫ (Xeλ), then +the number of ions produced per cubic centimetre per second is +∫ (Xeλ)nu/λ. If the collisions follow each other with great rapidity +so that a molecule has not had time to recover from one collision +before it is struck again, the effect of collisions might be cumulative, +so that a succession of collisions might give rise to ionization, though +none of the collisions would produce an ion by itself. In this case ∫ +would involve the frequency of the collisions as well as the energy +of the corpuscle; in other words, it might depend on the current +through the gas as well as upon the intensity of the electric field. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page879" id="page879"></a>879</span> +We shall, however, to begin with, assume that the current is so small +that this cumulative effect may be neglected.</p> + +<p>Let us now consider the rate of increase, dn/dt, in the number of +corpuscles per unit volume. In consequence of the collisions, +∫ (Xeλ)nu/λ corpuscles are produced per second; in consequence +of the motion of the corpuscles, the number which leave unit volume +per second is greater than those which enter it by d/dx · (nu); while in a +certain number of collisions a corpuscle will stick to the molecule and +will thus cease to be a free corpuscle. Let the fraction of the number +of collisions in which this occurs be β. Thus the gain in the number +of corpuscles is ∫ (Xeλ)nu/λ, while the loss is d/dx·(nu) + β·nu/λ hence</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>dn</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f150">∫</span>(Xeλ)</td> <td>nu</td> + <td rowspan="2">−</td> <td>d</td> + <td rowspan="2">(nu) −</td> <td>βnu</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dt</td> <td class="denom">λ</td> + <td class="denom">dx</td> <td class="denom">λ</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">When things are in a steady state dn/dt = 0, and we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(nu) =</td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2">(<span class="f150">∫</span>(Xeλ) − β) nu.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td> <td class="denom">λ</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If the current is so small that the electrical charges in the gas are +not able to produce any appreciable variations in the field, X will be +constant and we get nu = Cε<span class="sp">αx</span>, where α = {∫ (Xeλ) − β}/λ. If we take +the origin from which we measure x at the cathode, C is the value +of nu at the cathode, <i>i.e.</i> it is the number of corpuscles emitted per +unit area of the cathode per unit time; this is equal to i<span class="su">0</span>/e if i<span class="su">0</span> is +the quantity of negative electricity coming from unit area of the +cathode per second, and e the electric charge carried by a corpuscle. +Hence we have nue = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αx</span>. If l is the distance between the anode +and the cathode, the value of nue, when x = l, is the current passing +through unit area of the gas, if we neglect the electricity carried by +negatively electrified carriers other than corpuscles. Hence i = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">α l</span>. +Thus the current between the plates increases in geometrical +progression with the distance between the plates.</p> + +<p>By measuring the variation of the current as the distance between +the plates is increased, Townsend, to whom we owe much of our +knowledge on this subject, determined the values of α for different +values of X and for different pressures for air, hydrogen and carbonic +acid gas (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 1, p. 198). Since λ varies inversely as the +pressure, we see that α may be written in the form pφ(X/p) or +α/X = F(X/p). The following are some of the values of α found by +Townsend for air.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tcc allb">X Volts<br />per cm.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Pressure<br />.17 mm.</td> + <td class="tcc allb">Pressure<br />.38 mm.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Pressure<br />1.10 mm.</td> + <td class="tcc allb">Pressure<br />2.1 mm.</td> <td class="tcc allb">Pressure<br />4.1 mm.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb"> 20</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .24</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb"> 40</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .65</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .34</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb"> 80</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.35</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.3 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> .45</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .13</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">120</td> <td class="tcc rb">1.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb">2.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 1.1 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> .42</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .13</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">160</td> <td class="tcc rb">2.1 </td> <td class="tcc rb">2.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 2.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> .9 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> .28</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">200</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">3.4 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 2.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 1.6 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> .5 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">240</td> <td class="tcc rb">2.45</td> <td class="tcc rb">3.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 4.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 2.35</td> <td class="tcc rb"> .99</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">320</td> <td class="tcc rb">2.7 </td> <td class="tcc rb">4.5 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 5.5 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 4.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb">2.1  </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">400</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">5.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 6.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 6.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb">3.6 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">480</td> <td class="tcc rb">3.15</td> <td class="tcc rb">5.4 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 8.0 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 7.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb">5.3 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb">560</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">5.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 9.3 </td> <td class="tcc rb"> 9.4 </td> <td class="tcc rb">7.1 </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcc lb rb bb">640</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">3.25</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">6.2 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">10.6 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">10.8 </td> <td class="tcc rb bb">8.9 </td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">We see from this table that for a given value of X, α for small pressures +increases as the pressure increases; it attains a maximum at a +particular pressure, and then diminishes as the pressure increases. +The increase in the pressure increases the number of collisions, but +diminishes the energy acquired by the corpuscle in the electric +field, and thus diminishes the change of any one collision resulting +in ionization. If we suppose the field is so strong that at some +particular pressure the energy acquired by the corpuscle is well +above the value required to ionize at each collision, then it is evident +that increasing the number of collisions will increase the amount +of ionization, and therefore α, and α cannot begin to diminish until +the pressure has increased to such an extent that the mean free +path of a corpuscle is so small that the energy acquired by the +corpuscle from the electric field falls below the value when each +collision results in ionization.</p> + +<p>The value of p, when X is given, for which α is a maximum, is +proportional to X; this follows at once from the fact that α is of the +form X·F(X/p). The value of X/p for which F(X/p) is a maximum +is seen from the preceding table to be about 420, when X is expressed +in volts per centimetre and p in millimetres of mercury. The +maximum value of F(X/p) is about <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">60</span>. Since the current passing +between two planes at a distance l apart is i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αl</span> or i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">XlF(X/p)</span>, +and since the force between the plates is supposed to be uniform, +Xl is equal to V, the potential between the plates; hence the +current between the plates is i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">V·F(X/p)</span>, and the greatest value +it can have is i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">V/60</span>. Thus the ratio between the current between +the plates when there is ionization and when there is none cannot +be greater than ε<span class="sp">V/60</span>, when V is measured in volts. This result is +based on Townsend’s experiments with very weak currents; we +must remember, however, that when the collisions are so frequent +that the effects of collisions can accumulate, α may have much larger +values than when the current is small. In some experiments made +by J. J. Thomson with intense currents from cathodes covered +with hot lime, the increase in the current when the potential difference +was 60 volts, instead of being e times the current when there was no +ionization, as the preceding theory indicates, was several hundred +times that value, thus indicating a great increase in α with the +strength of the current.</p> + +<p>Townsend has shown that we can deduce from the values of α the +mean free path of a corpuscle. For if the ionization is due to the +collisions with the corpuscles, then unless one collision detaches +more than one corpuscle the maximum number of corpuscles produced +will be equal to the number of collisions. When each collision +results in the production of a corpuscle, α = 1/λ and is independent +of the strength of the electric field. Hence we see that the value of +α, when it is independent of the electric field, is equal to the reciprocal +of the free path. Thus from the table we infer that at a pressure +of 17 mm. the mean free path is <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">325</span> cm.; hence at 1 mm. the mean +free path of a corpuscle is <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">19</span> cm. Townsend has shown that this +value of the mean free path agrees well with the value <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">21</span> cm. +deduced from the kinetic theory of gases for a corpuscle moving +through air. By measuring the values of α for hydrogen and carbonic +acid gas Townsend and Kirby (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 1, p. 630) showed +that the mean free paths for corpuscles in these gases are respectively +<span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">11.5</span> and <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">29</span> cm. at a pressure of 1 mm. These results again agree +well with the values given by the kinetic theory of gases.</p> + +<p>If the number of positive ions per unit volume is m and v is the +velocity, we have nue + mve = i, where i is the current through unit +area of the gas. Since nue = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">nx</span> and i = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">nl</span>, when l is the distance +between the plates, we see that</p> + +<p class="center1">nu / mv = ε<span class="sp">nx</span> / (ε<span class="sp">nl</span> − ε<span class="sp">nx</span>),</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>n</td> <td rowspan="2">=</td> <td>v</td> <td rowspan="2">·</td> + <td>ε<span class="sp">nx</span></td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">m</td> <td class="denom">u</td> <td class="denom">ε<span class="sp">ne</span> − ε<span class="sp">nx</span></td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Since v/u is a very small quantity we see that n will be less than m +except when ε<span class="sp">nl</span> - ε<span class="sp">nx</span> is small, <i>i.e.</i> except close to the anode. Thus +there will be an excess of positive electricity from the cathode almost +up to the anode, while close to the anode there will be an excess of +negative. This distribution of electricity will make the electric +force diminish from the cathode to the place where there is as much +positive as negative electricity, where it will have its minimum +value, and then increase up to the anode.</p> + +<p>The expression i = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αl</span> applies to the case when there is no source +of ionization in the gas other than the collisions; if in addition to +this there is a source of uniform ionization producing q ions per cubic +centimetre, we can easily show that</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">i = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αl</span> +</td> <td>qe</td> + <td rowspan="2">(e<span class="sp">αl</span> − 1).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">α</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">With regard to the minimum energy which must be possessed by a +corpuscle to enable it to produce ions by collision, Townsend (loc. +cit.) came to the conclusion that to ionize air the corpuscle must +possess an amount of energy equal to that acquired by the fall of its +charge through a potential difference of about 2 volts. This is also +the value arrived at by H. A. Wilson by entirely different considerations. +Stark, however, gives 17 volts as the minimum for ionization. +The energy depends upon the nature of the gas; recent experiments by +Dawes and Gill and Pedduck (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, Aug. 1908) have shown that +it is smaller for helium than for air, hydrogen, or carbonic acid gas.</p> +</div> + +<p>If there is no external source of ionization and no emission of +corpuscles from the cathode, then it is evident that even if some +corpuscles happened to be present in the gas when the electric +field were applied, we could not get a permanent current by +the aid of collisions made by these corpuscles. For under the +electric field, the corpuscles would be driven from the cathode +to the anode, and in a short time all the corpuscles originally +present in the gas and those produced by them would be driven +from the gas against the anode, and if there was no source from +which fresh corpuscles could be introduced into the gas the +current would cease. The current, however, could be maintained +indefinitely if the positive ions in their journey back to the cathode +also produced ions by collisions, for then we should have a kind +of regenerative process by which the supply of corpuscles could +be continually renewed. To maintain the current it is not necessary +that the ionization resulting from the positive ions should be +anything like as great as that from the negative, as the investigation +given below shows a very small amount of ionization by the +positive ions will suffice to maintain the current. The existence +of ionization by collision with positive ions has been proved by +Townsend. Another method by which the current could be +and is maintained is by the anode emitting corpuscles under the +impact of the positive ions driven against it by the electric field. +J. J. Thomson has shown by direct experiment that positively +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page880" id="page880"></a>880</span> +electrified particles when they strike against a metal plate cause +the metal to emit corpuscles (J. J. Thomson, <i>Proc. Camb. Phil. +Soc.</i> 13, p. 212; Austin, <i>Phys. Rev.</i> 22, p. 312). If we assume +that the number of corpuscles emitted by the plate in one second +is proportional to the energy in the positive ions which strike +the plate in that second, we can readily find an expression for +the difference of potential which will maintain without any +external ionization a current of electricity through the gas. +As this investigation brings into prominence many of the most +important features of the electric discharge, we shall consider it +in some detail.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>Let us suppose that the electrodes are parallel plates of metal at +right angles to the axis of x, and that at the cathode x = 0 and at the +anode x = d, d being thus the distance between the plates. Let us +also suppose that the current of electricity flowing between the plates +is so small that the electrification between the plates due to the +accumulation of ions is not sufficient to disturb appreciably the +electric field, which we regard as uniform between the plates, the +electric force being equal to V/d, where V is the potential difference +between the plates. The number of positive ions produced per +second in a layer of gas between the planes x and x + dx is αnu·dx. +Here n is the number of corpuscles per unit volume, α the coefficient +of ionization (for strong electric field α = 1/λ′, where λ′ is the mean +free path of a corpuscle), and u the velocity of a corpuscle parallel +to x. We have seen that nu = i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αx</span>, where i<span class="su">0</span> is the number of +corpuscles emitted per second by unit area of the cathode. Thus +the number of positive ions produced in the layer is αi<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αx</span> dx. If +these went straight to the cathode without a collision, each of them +would have received an amount of kinetic energy Vex/d when +they struck the cathode, and the energy of the group of ions would +be Vex/d·αi<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">dx</span> dx. The positive ions will, however, collide with +the molecules of the gas through which they are passing, and this +will diminish the energy they possess when they reach the cathode.</p> + +<p>The diminution in the energy will increase in geometrical proportion +with the length of path travelled by the ion and will thus +be proportional to ε<span class="sp">−βx</span>, β will be proportional to the number of +collisions and will thus be proportional to the pressure of the gas. +Thus the kinetic energy possessed by the ions when they reach the +cathode will be</p> + +<p class="center1">ε<span class="sp">−βx</span>·V(ex/d) · α i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αx</span> dx,</p> + +<p class="noind">and E, the total amount of energy in the positive ions which reach +the cathode in unit time, will be given by the equation</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">E = <span class="f200">∫</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">d</span><span class="su2">0</span> + ε<span class="sp">−βx</span> · V(ex/d) · α i<span class="su">0</span>ε<span class="sp">αx</span> dx =</td> + <td>Veα i<span class="su">0</span></td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f200">∫</span><span class="sp" style="bottom: 1.5em;">d</span><span class="su2">0</span> + ε<span class="sp">−(β−α)x</span> x dx</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">d</td></tr></table> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">=</td> <td>Veα i<span class="su">0</span></td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span></td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2"> − ε<span class="sp">−(β−α)d</span><span class="f200">{</span></td> <td>1</td> + <td rowspan="2">+</td> <td>d</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f200">}</span><span class="f250">}</span>  (1).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">d</td> <td class="denom">(β − α)²</td> + <td class="denom">(β − α)²</td> <td class="denom">(β − α)</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If the number of corpuscles emitted by the cathode in unit time is +proportional to this energy we have i<span class="su">0</span> = kE, where k is a constant; +hence by equation (1) we have</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V =</td> <td>(β − α)²</td> + <td rowspan="2">·</td> <td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">ke α</td> <td class="denom">I</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where</p> + +<p class="center1">I = 1 − ε<span class="sp">−(β−α)d</span> (1 + d (β − α)).</p> + +<p class="noind">Since both β and α are proportional to the pressure, I and (β − α)²d/α +are both functions of pd, the product of the pressure and the spark +length, hence we see that V is expressed by an equation of the form</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">V =</td> <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f150">∫</span> (pd)   (2),</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">ke</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where ∫ (pd) denotes a function of pd, and neither p nor d enter into +the expression for V except in this product. Thus the potential +difference required to produce discharge is constant as long as the +product of the pressure and spark length remains constant; in +other words, the spark potential is constant as long as the mass +of the gas between the electrodes is constant. Thus, for example, +if we halve the pressure the same potential difference will produce +a spark of twice the length. This law, which was discovered by +Paschen for fairly long sparks (<i>Annalen</i>, 37, p. 79), and has been +shown by Carr (<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1903) to hold for short ones, is one of +the most important properties of the electric discharge.</p> + +<p>We see from the expression for V that when (β − α)d is very large</p> + +<p class="center1">V = (β − α)²d/keα.</p> + +<p class="noind">Thus V becomes infinite when d is infinite. Again when (β − α)d +is very small we find</p> + +<p class="center1">V = 1/keαd;</p> + +<p class="noind">thus V is again infinite when d is nothing. There must therefore +be some value of d intermediate between zero and infinity for which +V is a minimum. This value is got by finding in the usual way the +value of d, which makes the expression for V given in equation (1) +a minimum. We find that d must satisfy the equation</p> + +<p class="center1">1 = ε<span class="sp">−(β−α)d</span> {1 + (β − α)d + (β − α·d)²}.</p> + +<p class="noind">We find by a process of trial and error that (β − α)d = 1.8 is approximately +a solution of this equation; hence the distance for minimum +potential is 1.8/(β − α). Since β and α are both proportional to the +pressure, we see that the critical spark length varies inversely as +the pressure. If we substitute this value in the expression for V +we find that <span class="ov">V</span>, the minimum spark potential, is given by</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2"><span class="ov">V</span> =</td> <td>β − α</td> + <td rowspan="2">·</td> <td>2.2</td> <td rowspan="2">.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">α</td> <td class="denom">ke</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">Since β and α are each proportional to the pressure, the minimum +potential is independent of the pressure of the gas. On this view +the minimum potential depends upon the metal of which the cathode +is made, since k measures the number of corpuscles emitted per unit +time by the cathode when struck by positive ions carrying unit +energy, and unless β bears the same ratio to α for all gases the +minimum potential will also vary with the gas. The measurements +which have been made of the “cathode fall of potential,” which as +we shall see is equal to the minimum potential required to produce a +spark, show that this quantity varies with the material of which the +cathode is made and also with the nature of the gas. Since a metal +plate, when bombarded by positive ions, emits corpuscles, the effect +we have been considering must play a part in the discharge; it is +not, however, the only effect which has to be considered, for as +Townsend has shown, positive ions when moving above a certain +speed ionize the gas, and cause it to emit corpuscles. It is thus +necessary to take into account the ionization of the positive ions.</p> + +<p>Let m be the number of positive ions per unit volume, and w +their velocity, the number of collisions which occur in one second +in one cubic centimetre of the gas will be proportional to mwp, +where p is the pressure of the gas. Let the number of ions which +result from these collisions be γmw; γ will be a function of p and +of the strength of the electric field. Let as before n be the number +of corpuscles per cubic centimetre, u their velocity, and αnu the +number of ions which result in one second from the collisions between +the corpuscles and the gas. The number of ions produced per +second per cubic centimetre is equal to αnu + γmw; hence when +things are in a steady state</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>d</td> <td rowspan="2">(nu) = αnu + γ mw,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">dx</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">and</p> + +<p class="center1">e(nu + mw) = i,</p> + +<p class="noind">where e is the charge on the ion and i the current through the gas. +The solution of these equations when the field is uniform between the +plates, is</p> + +<p class="center1">enu = Cε<span class="sp">(α−γ)x</span> − γi / (α − γ),   + emw = -Cε<span class="sp">(α−γ)x</span> + αi / (α − γ),</p> + +<p class="noind">where C is a constant of integration. If there is no emission of +positive ions from the anode enu = i, when x = d. Determining C +from this condition we find</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td rowspan="2">enu =</td> <td>i</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span>αε <span class="sp">(α−γ) (x−d)</span> − γ + <span class="f250">}</span>,  emw =</td> <td>αi</td> + <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span>1 − ε <span class="sp">(α−γ) (x−d)</span> + <span class="f250">}</span>.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">α − γ</td> <td class="denom">α − γ</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">If the cathode did not emit any corpuscles owing to the bombardment +by positive ions, the condition that the charge should be +maintained is that there should be enough positive ions at the cathode +to carry the current <i>i.e.</i> that emw = i; when x = 0, the condition +gives</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>i</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">{</span> + αε<span class="sp">−(α−γ)d</span> − γ<span class="f250">}</span> = 0</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">α − γ</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">or</p> + +<p class="center1">ε <span class="sp">αd</span>/α = ε <span class="sp">γd</span>/γ.</p> + +<p class="noind">Since α and γ are both of the form p∫ (X/p) and X = V/d, we see that +V will be a function of pd, in agreement with Paschen’s law. If we +take into account both the ionization of the gas and the emission +of corpuscles by the metal we can easily show that</p> + +<table class="math0" summary="math"> +<tr><td>α − γε<span class="sp">(α−γ)d</span></td> <td rowspan="2">=</td> + <td>kαVe</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">[</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">− ε<span class="sp">−(β+γ−α)d</span><span class="f250">{</span></td> + <td>1</td> <td rowspan="2">+</td> + <td>d</td> <td rowspan="2"><span class="f250">}]</span>,</td></tr> +<tr><td class="denom">α − γ</td> <td class="denom">d</td> + <td class="denom">(β + γ − α)²</td> <td class="denom">(β + γ − α)²</td> + <td class="denom">β + γ − α</td></tr></table> + +<p class="noind">where k and β have the same meaning as in the previous investigation. +When d is large, ε<span class="sp">(α−γ)d</span> is also large; hence in order that the left-hand +side of this equation should not be negative γ must be less +than α/ε<span class="sp">(α−γ)d</span>; as this diminishes as d increases we see that when +the sparks are very long discharge will take place, practically as +soon as γ has a finite value, <i>i.e.</i> as soon as the positive ions begin to +produce fresh ions by their collisions.</p> +</div> + +<p>In the preceding investigation we have supposed that the +electric field between the plates was uniform; if it were not +uniform we could get discharges produced by very much smaller +differences of potential than are necessary in a uniform field. +For to maintain the discharge it is not necessary that the positive +ions should act as ionizers all along their path; it is sufficient +that they should do so in the neighbourhood of cathode. Thus +if we have a strong field close to the cathode we might still get +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page881" id="page881"></a>881</span> +the discharge though the rest of the field were comparatively +weak. Such a distribution of electric force requires, however, +a great accumulation of charged ions near the cathode; until +these ions accumulate the field will be uniform. If the uniform +field existing in the gas before the discharge begins were strong +enough to make the corpuscles produce ions by collision, but not +strong enough to make the positive ions act as ionizers, there +would be some accumulation of ions, and the amount of this +accumulation would depend upon the number of free corpuscles +originally present in the gas, and upon the strength of the electric +field. If the accumulation were sufficient to make the field +near the cathode so strong that the positive ions could produce +fresh ions either by collision with the cathode or with the gas, +the discharge would pass though the gas; if not, there will be no +continuous discharge. As the amount +of the accumulation depends on the +number of corpuscles present in the gas, +we can understand how it is that after +a spark has passed, leaving for a time +a supply of corpuscles behind it, it is +easier to get a discharge to pass through +the gas than it was before.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 230px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:184px; height:471px" src="images/img881a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 15.</td></tr></table> + +<p>The inequality of the electric field in +the gas when a continuous discharge is +passing through it is very obvious when +the pressure of the gas is low. In this +case the discharge presents a highly +differentiated appearance of which a +type is represented in fig. 15. Starting +from the cathode we have a thin velvety +luminous glow in contact with the surface; +this glow is +often called the “first +cathode layer.” Next +this we have a comparatively +dark space +whose thickness increases +as the pressure +diminishes; this is +called the “Crookes’s dark space,” or the +“second cathode layer.” Next this we have +a luminous position called the “negative +glow” or the “third cathode layer.” The +boundary between the second and third layers +is often very sharply defined. Next to the +third layer we have another dark space called +the “Faraday dark space.” Next to this and reaching up to the +anode is another region of luminosity, called the “positive +column,” sometimes (as in fig. 15, a) continuous, sometimes (as +in fig. 15, b) broken up into light or dark patches called “striations.” +The dimensions of the Faraday dark space and the positive +column vary greatly with the current passing through the +gas and with its pressure; sometimes one or +other of them is absent. These differences +in appearances are accompanied by great +difference in the strength of the electric +field. The magnitude of the electric force +at different parts of the discharge is represented +in fig. 16, where the ordinates represent +the electric force at different parts of +the tube, the cathode being on the right. +We see that the electric force is very large indeed between the +negative glow and the cathode, much larger than in any other +part of the tube. It is not constant in this region, but increases +as we approach the cathode. The force reaches a minimum +either in the negative glow itself or in the part of the Faraday +dark space just outside, after which it increases towards the +positive column. In the case of a uniform positive column the +electric force along it is constant until we get quite close to the +anode, when a sudden change, called the “anode fall,” takes +place in the potential.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="clear: both;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:473px; height:306px" src="images/img881b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 16.</td></tr></table> + +<p>The difference of potential between the cathode and the +negative glow is called the “cathode potential fall” and is +found to be constant for wide variations in the pressure of the +gas and the current passing through. It increases, however, +considerably when the current through the gas exceeds a certain +critical value, depending among other things on the size of the +cathode. This cathode fall of potential is shown by experiment +to be very approximately equal to the minimum potential +difference. The following table contains a comparison of the +measurements of the cathode fall of potentials in various gases +made by Warburg (<i>Wied. Ann.</i>, 1887, 31, p. 545, and 1890, 40, +p. 1), Capstick (<i>Proc. Roy. Society</i>, 1898, 63, p. 356), and Strutt +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1900, 193, p. 377), and the measurements by Strutt +of the smallest difference of potential which will maintain a +spark through these gases.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" rowspan="3">Gas.</td> <td class="tccm allb" colspan="4">Cathode fall in Volts.</td> + <td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Least potential<br />difference required<br />to maintain a Spark.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" colspan="3">Platinum Electrodes.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Aluminium<br />Electrodes.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Warburg.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Capstick.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Strutt.</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Warburg.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Strutt.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb">340-350</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">341</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">about 300</td> <td class="tcc rb">298</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">168</td> <td class="tcc rb">302-308</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">369</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">N<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">230 if free</td> <td class="tcc rb">232</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">207</td> <td class="tcc rb">251</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">from oxygen</td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb"> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Hg vapour</td> <td class="tcc rb">340</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Helium</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">226</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">261-326</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H<span class="su">2</span>O</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">469</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">NH<span class="su">3</span></td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">582</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Thus in the cases in which the measurements could be made +with the greatest accuracy the agreement between the cathode +fall and the minimum potential difference is very close. The +cathode fall depends on the material of which the terminals +are made, as is shown by the following table due to Mey (<i>Verh. +deutsch. physik. Gesell.</i>, 1903, 5, p. 72).</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Gas.</td> <td class="tccm allb" colspan="11">Electrode.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Pt</td> <td class="tccm allb">Hg</td> <td class="tccm allb">Ag</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Cu</td> <td class="tccm allb">Fe</td> <td class="tccm allb">Zn</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Al</td> <td class="tccm allb">Mg</td> <td class="tccm allb">Na</td> + <td class="tccm allb">Na-K</td> <td class="tccm allb">K</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">369</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">300</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">295</td> <td class="tcc rb">280</td> <td class="tcc rb">230</td> <td class="tcc rb">213</td> <td class="tcc rb">190</td> <td class="tcc rb">168</td> <td class="tcc rb">185</td> <td class="tcc rb">169</td> <td class="tcc rb">172</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">N<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">232</td> <td class="tcc rb">226</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">207</td> <td class="tcc rb">178</td> <td class="tcc rb">125</td> <td class="tcc rb">170</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">He</td> <td class="tcc rb">226</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">80</td> <td class="tcc rb">78.5</td> <td class="tcc rb"> 69</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Argon</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">167</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">100</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td></tr> +</table> + +<p>The dependence of the minimum potential required to produce +a spark upon the metal of which the cathode is made has not +been clearly established, some observers being unable to detect +any difference between the potential required to spark between +electrodes of aluminium and those of brass, while others thought +they had detected such a difference. It is only with sparks +not much longer than the critical spark length that we could +hope to detect this difference. When the current through the +gas exceeds a certain critical value depending among other +things on the size of the cathode, the cathode fall of potential +increases rapidly and at the same time the thickness of the dark +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page882" id="page882"></a>882</span> +spaces diminishes. We may regard the part of the discharge +between the cathode and the negative glow as a discharge taking +place under minimum potential difference through a distance +equal to the critical spark length. An inspection of fig. 16 will +show that we cannot regard the electric field as constant even +for this small distance; it thus becomes a matter of interest to +know what would be the effect on the minimum potential +difference required to produce a spark if there were sufficient +ions present to produce variations in the electric field analogous +to those represented in fig. 16. If the electric force at a distance +x from the cathode were proportional to ε<span class="sp">-px</span> we should have a +state of things much resembling the distribution of electric +force near the cathode. If we apply to this distribution the +methods used above for the case when the force was uniform, +we shall find that the minimum potential is less and the +critical spark length greater than when the electric force is +uniform.</p> + +<p><i>Potential Difference required to produce a Spark of given Length.</i>—We +may regard the region between the cathode and the negative +glow as a place for the production of corpuscles, these corpuscles +finding their way from this region through the negative glow. +The parts of this glow towards the anode we may regard as a +cathode, from which, as from a hot lime cathode, corpuscles are +emitted. Let us now consider what will happen to these corpuscles +shot out from the negative glow with a velocity depending +on the cathode fall of potential and independent of the pressure. +These corpuscles will collide with the molecules of the gas, and +unless there is an external electric field to maintain their velocity +they will soon come to rest and accumulate in front of the +negative glow. The electric force exerted by this cloud of +corpuscles will diminish the strength of the electric field in the +region between the cathode and the negative glow, and thus +tend to stop the discharge. To keep up the discharge we must +have a sufficiently strong electric field between the negative +glow and the anode to remove the corpuscles from this region as +fast as they are sent into it from the cathode. If, however, +there is no production of ions in the region between the negative +glow and the anode, all the ions in this region will have come +from near the cathode and will be negatively charged; this +negative electrification will diminish the electric force on the +cathode side of it and thus tend to stop the discharge. This +back electric field could, however, be prevented by a little ionization +in the region between the anode and glow, for this would +afford a supply of positive ions, and thus afford an opportunity +for the gas in this region to have in it as many positive as negative +ions; in this case it would not give rise to any back electromotive +force. The ionization which produces these positive +ions may, if the field is intense, be due to the collisions of corpuscles, +or it may be due to radiation analogous to ultra-violet, +or soft Röntgen rays, which have been shown by experiment +to accompany the discharge. Thus in the most simple conditions +for discharge we should have sufficient ionization to keep up the +supply of positive ions, and an electric field strong enough to +keep the velocity of the negative corpuscle equal to the value +it has when it emerges from the negative glow. Thus the force +must be such as to give a constant velocity to the corpuscle, +and since the force required to move an ion with a given velocity +is proportional to the pressure, this force will be proportional +to the pressure of the gas. Let us call this force ap; then if l +is the distance of the anode from the negative glow the potential +difference between these points will be alp. The potential +difference between the negative glow and the cathode is constant +and equals c; hence if V is the potential difference between +the anode and cathode, then V = c + alp, a relation which expresses +the connexion between the potential difference and +spark length for spark lengths greater than the critical distance. +It is to be remembered that the result we have obtained applies +only to such a case as that indicated above, where the electric +force is constant along the positive column. Experiments +with the discharge through gases at low pressure show the +discharge may take other forms. Thus the positive column +may be striated when the force along it is no longer uniform, +or the positive column may be absent; the discharge may be +changed from one of these forms to another by altering the +current. The relation between the potential and the distance +between the electrodes varies greatly, as we might expect, with +the current passing through the gas.</p> + +<p>The connexion between the potential difference and the +spark length has been made the subject of a large number of +experiments. The first measurements were made by Lord +Kelvin in 1860 (<i>Collected Papers on Electrostatics and Magnetism</i>, +p. 247); subsequent experiments have been made by Baille +(<i>Ann. de chimie et de physique</i>, 5, 25, p. 486), Liebig (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> +[5], 24, p. 106), Paschen (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 37, p. 79), Peace (<i>Proc. Roy. +Soc.</i>, 1892, 52, p. 99), Orgler (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 1, p. 159), Strutt +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 193, p. 377), Bouty (<i>Comptes rendus</i>, 131, pp. 469, +503), Earhart (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 1, p. 147), Carr (<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1903), +Russell (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [5], 64, p. 237), Hobbs (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 10, +p. 617), Kinsley (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> [6], 9, 692), Ritter (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> +14, p. 118). The results of their experiments show that for sparks +considerably longer than the critical spark length, the relation +between the potential difference V and the spark length l may +be expressed when the electrodes are large with great accuracy +by the linear relation V = c + blp, where p is the pressure and +c and b are constants depending on the nature of the gas. When +the sparks are long the term blp is the most important and the +sparking potential is proportional to the spark length. Though +there are considerable discrepancies between the results obtained +by different observers, these indicate that the production of a +long spark between large electrodes in air at atmospheric pressure +requires a potential difference of 30,000 volts for each centimetre +of spark length. In hydrogen only about half this potential +difference is required, in carbonic acid gas the potential difference +is about the same as in air, while Ritter’s experiments show +that in helium only about one-tenth of this potential difference +is required.</p> + +<p>In the case when the electric field is not uniform, as for example +when the discharge takes place between spherical electrodes, +Russell’s experiments show that the discharge takes place as +soon as the maximum electric force in the field between the +electrodes reaches a definite value, which he found was for air at +atmospheric pressure about 38,000 volts per centimetre.</p> + +<p><i>Very Short Sparks.</i>—Some very interesting experiments on the +potential difference required to produce exceedingly short sparks +have been made by Earhart, Hobbs and Kinsley; the length of +these sparks was comparable with the wave length of sodium +light. With sparks of these lengths it was found that it was +possible to get a discharge with less than 330 volts, the minimum +potential difference in air. The results of these observers show +that there is no diminution in the minimum potential difference +required to produce discharge until the spark length gets so small +that the average electric force between the electrodes amounts to +about one million volts per centimetre. When the force rises to +this value a discharge takes place even though the potential +difference is much less than 330 volts; in some of Earhart’s +experiments it was only about 2 volts. This kind of discharge is +determined not by the condition that the potential difference +should have a given value, but that the electric force should have +a given value. Another point in which this discharge differs from +the ordinary one is that it is influenced entirely by the nature +of the electrodes and not by the nature or pressure of the gas +between them, whereas the ordinary discharge is in many cases +not affected appreciably by changes in the metal of the electrodes, +but is always affected by changes in the pressure and character +of the gas between them. Kinsley found that when one of these +small sparks passed between the electrodes a kind of metallic +bridge was formed between them, so that they were in metallic +connexion, and that the distance between them had to be +considerably increased before the bridge was broken. Almy +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, Sept. 1908), who used very small electrodes, was +unable to get a discharge with less than the minimum spark +potential even when the spark length was reduced to one-third of +the wave length of sodium light. He suggests that the discharges +obtained with larger electrodes for smaller voltages are +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page883" id="page883"></a>883</span> +due to the electrodes being dragged together by the electrostatic +attraction between them.</p> + +<p><i>Constitution of the Electric Spark.</i>—Schuster and Hemsalech +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 193, p. 189), Hemsalech (<i>Comptes Rendus</i>, 130, p. +898; 132, p. 917; <i>Jour. de Phys.</i> 3. 9, p. 43, and Schenck, <i>Astrophy. +Jour.</i> 14, p. 116) have by spectroscopic methods obtained very +interesting results about the constitution of the spark. The +method employed by Schuster and Hemsalech was as follows: +Suppose we photograph the spectrum of a horizontal spark on a +film which is on the rim of a wheel rotating about a horizontal +axis with great velocity. If the luminosity travelled with +infinite speed from one electrode to the other, the image on the +film would be a horizontal line. If, however, the speed with +which the luminosity travelled between the electrodes was +comparable with the speed of the film, the line would be inclined +to the horizontal, and by measuring the inclinations we could +find the speed at which the luminosity travelled. In this way +Schuster and Hemsalech showed that when an oscillating +discharge passed between metallic terminals in air, the first spark +passes through the air alone, no lines of the metal appearing in +its spectrum. This first spark vaporizes some of the metal and +the subsequent sparks passing mainly through the metallic +vapour; the appearance of the lines in the film shows that the +velocity of the luminous part of the vapour was finite. The +velocity of the vapour of metals of low atomic weight was in +general greater than that of the vapour of heavier metals. +Thus the velocity of aluminium vapour was 1890 metres per +second, that of zinc and cadmium only about 545. Perhaps the +most interesting point in the investigation was the discovery that +the velocities corresponding to different lines in the spectrum of +the same metal were in some cases different. Thus with bismuth +some of the lines indicated a velocity of 1420 metres per second, +others a velocity of only 550, while one (λ = 3793) showed +a still smaller velocity. These results are in accordance with a +view suggested by other phenomena that many of the lines in a +spectrum produced by an electrical discharge originate from +systems formed during the discharge and not from the normal +atom or molecule. Schuster and Hemsalech found that by +inserting a coil with large self induction in the primary circuit +they could obliterate the air lines in the discharge.</p> + +<p>Schenck, by observing the appearance presented when an +alternating current, produced by discharging Leyden jars, was +examined in a rapidly rotating mirror, found it showed the +following stages: (1) a thin bright line, followed in some cases at +intervals of half the period of the discharge by fainter lines; (2) +bright curved streamers starting from the negative terminal, and +diminishing rapidly in speed as they receded from the cathode; +(3) a diffused glow lasting for a much longer period than either +of the preceding. These constituents gave out quite different +spectra.</p> + +<p>The structure of the discharge is much more easily studied +when the pressure of the gas is low, as the various parts which +make up the discharge are more widely separated from each other. +We have already described the general appearance of the discharge +through gases at low pressures (see p. 657). There is, +however, one form of discharge which is so striking and beautiful +that it deserves more detailed consideration. In this type of +discharge, known as the striated discharge, the positive column +is made up of alternate bright and dark patches known as +<i>striations</i>. Some of these are represented in fig. 17, which is +taken from a paper by De la Rue and Müller (<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1878, +Pt. 1). This type of discharge only occurs when the current and +the pressure of the gas are between certain limits. It is most +beautifully shown when a Wehnelt cathode is used and the +current is produced by storage cells, as this allows us to use large +currents and to maintain a steady potential difference between the +electrodes. The striations are in consequence very bright and +steady. The facts which have been established about these +striations are as follows: The distance between the bright parts +of the striations is greater at low pressures than at high; it +depends also upon the diameter of the tube, increasing as the +diameter of the tube increases. If the discharge tube is wide at +one place and narrow in another the striations will be closer +together in the narrow parts than in the wide. The distance +between the striations depends on the current through the tube. +The relation is not a very simple one, as an increase of current +sometimes increases while under other circumstances it decreases +the distance between the striations (see Willows, <i>Proc. Camb. +Phil. Soc.</i> 10, p. 302). The electric force is not uniform along the +striated discharge, but is greater in the bright than in the dark +parts of the striation. An example is shown in fig. 16, due to H. +A. Wilson, which shows the distribution of electric force at every +place in a striated discharge. In experiments made by J. J. +Thomson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, Oct. 1909), using a Wehnelt cathode, the +variations in the electric force were more pronounced than those +shown in fig. 16. The electric force in this case changed so greatly +that it actually became negative just on the cathode side of the +bright part of the striation. Just inside the striation on the anode +side it rose to a very high value, then continually diminished +towards the bright side of the next striation when it again +increased. This distribution of electric force implies that there +is great excess of negative electricity at the bright head of the +striation, and a small excess of positive everywhere else. The +temperature of the gas is higher in the bright than in the dark +parts of the striations. Wood (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 49, p. 238), who has +made a very careful study of the distribution of temperature in +a discharge tube, finds that in those tubes the temperature varies +in the same way as the electric force, but that this temperature +(which it must be remembered is the average temperature of all +the molecules and not merely of those which are taking part in +the discharge) is by no means high; in no part of the discharge +did the temperature in his experiments exceed 100° C.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:517px; height:531px" src="images/img883.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 17.</td></tr></table> + +<p><i>Theory of the Striations.</i>—We may regard the heaping up of +the negative charges at intervals along the discharge as the +fundamental feature in the striations, and this heaping up may +be explained as follows. Imagine a corpuscle projected with +considerable velocity from a place where the electric field is +strong, such as the neighbourhood of the cathode; as it moves +towards the anode through the gas it will collide with the molecules, +ionize them and lose energy and velocity. Thus unless +the corpuscle is acted on by a field strong enough to supply it +with the energy it loses by collision, its speed will gradually +diminish. Further, when its energy falls below a certain value +it will unite with a molecule and become part of a negative ion, +instead of a corpuscle; at this stage there will be a sudden and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page884" id="page884"></a>884</span> +very large diminution in its velocity. Let us now follow the +course of a stream of corpuscles starting from the cathode and +approaching the anode. If the speed falls off as the stream +proceeds, the corpuscles in the rear will gain on those in front +and the density of the stream in the front will be increased. +If at a certain place the velocity receives a sudden check by the +corpuscles becoming loaded with a molecule, the density of the +negative electricity will increase at this place with great rapidity, +and here there will be a great accumulation of negative electricity, +as at the bright head on the cathode side of a striation. Now +this accumulation of negative electricity will produce a large +electric force on the anode side; this will drive corpuscles +forward with great velocity and ionize the gas. These corpuscles +will behave like those shot from the cathode and will accumulate +again at some distance from their origin, forming the bright +head of the next striation, when the process will be repeated. +On this view the bright heads of the striations act like electrodes, +and the discharge passes from one bright head to the next as by +a number of stepping stones, and not directly from cathode +to anode. The luminosity at the head of the striations is due +to the recombination of the ions. These ions have acquired +considerable energy from the electric field, and this energy will +be available for supplying the energy radiated away as light. +The recombination of ions which do not possess considerable +amounts of energy does not seem to give rise to luminosity. +Thus, in an ionized gas not exposed to an electric field, although +we have recombination between the ions, we need not have +luminosity. We have at present no exact data as to the amount +of energy which must be given to an ion to make it luminous +on recombination; it also certainly varies with the nature of +the ion; thus even with hot Wehnelt cathodes J. J. Thomson +has never been able to make the discharge through air luminous +with a potential less than from 16 to 17 volts. The mercury +lamps, however, in which the discharge passes through mercury +vapour are luminous with a potential difference of about 12 +volts. It follows that if the preceding theory be right the +potential difference between two bright striations must be +great enough to make the corpuscles ionize by collision and also +to give enough energy to the ions to make them luminous when +they recombine. The difference of potential between the bright +parts of successive striations has been measured by Hohn (<i>Phys. +Zeit.</i> 9, p. 558); it varies with the pressure and with the gas. +The smallest value given by Hohn is about 15 volts. In some +experiments made by J. J. Thomson, when the pressure of the +gas was very low, the difference of potential between two adjacent +dark spaces was as low as 3.75 volts.</p> + +<p><i>The Arc Discharge.</i>—The discharges we have hitherto considered +have been characterized by large potential differences +and small currents. In the arc discharge we get very large +currents with comparatively small potential differences. We +may get the arc discharge by taking a battery of cells large +enough to give a potential difference of 60 to 80 volts, and +connecting the cells with two carbon terminals, which are put +in contact, so that a current of electricity flows round the circuit. +If the terminals, while the current is on, are drawn apart, a +bright discharge, which may carry a current of many amperes, +passes from one to the other. This arc discharge, as it is called, is +characterized by intense heat and by the brilliant luminosity +of the terminals. This makes it a powerful source of light. +The temperature of the positive terminal is much higher than +that of the negative. According to Violle (<i>Comptes Rendus</i>, +115, p. 1273) the temperature of the tip of the former is about +3500° C, and that of the latter 2700° C. The temperature of the +arc itself he found to be higher than that of either of its terminals. +As the arc passes, the positive terminal gets hollowed out into +a crater-like shape, but the negative terminal remains pointed. +Both terminals lose weight.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The appearance of the terminals is shown in fig. 18, given by Mrs +Ayrton (<i>Proc. Inst. Elec. Eng.</i> 28, p. 400); a, b represent the terminals +when the arc is quiet, and c when it is accompanied by a hissing sound. +The intrinsic brightness of the positive crater does not increase with +an increase in the current; an increased current produces an increase +in the area of the luminous crater, but the amount of light given +out by each unit of area of luminous surface is unaltered. This +indicates that the temperature of the crater is constant; it is +probably that at which carbon volatilizes. W. E. Wilson (<i>Proc. +Roy. Soc.</i> 58, p. 174; 60, p. 377) has shown that at pressures of +several atmospheres the intrinsic brightness of the crater is considerably +diminished.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:443px; height:254px" src="images/img884a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 18.</td></tr></table> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:418px; height:309px" src="images/img884b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 19.</td></tr></table> + +<p>The connexion between V, the potential difference between the +terminals, and l, the length of the arc, is somewhat analogous to +that which holds for the spark discharge. Fröhlich (<i>Electrotech. Zeit.</i> +4, p. 150) gives for this connexion the relation V = m + nl, where +m and n are constants. Mrs Ayrton (<i>The Electric Arc</i>, chap. iv.) +finds that both m and n depend upon the current passing between +the terminals, and gives as the relation between V and l, +V = α + β/I + (γ + δ/I)l, +where α, β, γ, δ are constants and I the current. +The relation between current and potential difference was made the +subject of a series of experiments by Ayrton (<i>Electrician</i>, 1, p. 319; +xi. p. 418), some of whose results are represented in fig. 19. For a +quiet arc an increase in current is accompanied by a fall in potential +difference, while for the hissing arc the potential difference is independent +of the current. The quantities m and n which occur in +Fröhlich’s equation have been determined by several experimenters. +For carbon electrodes in air at atmospheric pressure m is about 39 +volts, varying somewhat with the size and purity of the carbons; +it is diminished by soaking the terminals in salt solution. The +value of n given by different observers varies considerably, ranging +from .76 to 2 volts when l is measured in millimetres; it depends +upon the current, diminishing as the current increases. When +metallic terminals are used instead of carbons, the value of m +depends upon the nature of the metal, m in general being larger +the higher the temperature at which the metal volatilizes. Thus +v. Lang (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 31, p. 384) found the following values for m in +air at atmospheric pressure:—C = 35; Pt = 27.4; Fe = 25; Ni = 26.18; +Cu = 23.86; Ag = 15.23; Zn = 19.86; Cd = 10.28. Lecher (<i>Wied. +Ann.</i> 33, p. 609) gives Pt = 28, Fe = 20, Ag = 8, while Arons (<i>Wied. +Ann.</i> 31, p. 384) found for Hg the value 12.8; in this case the fall of +potential along the arc itself was abnormally small. In comparing +these values it is important to remember that Lecher (loc. cit.) has +shown that with Fe or Pt terminals the arc discharge is intermittent. +Arons has shown that this is also the case with Hg terminals, but +no intermittence has been detected with terminals of C, Ag or Cu. +The preceding measurements refer to mean potentials, and no +conclusions as to the actual potential differences at any time can be +drawn when the discharge is discontinuous, unless we know the law +of discontinuity. The ease with which an arc is sustained depends +greatly on the nature of the electrodes; when they are brass, zinc, +cadmium, or magnesium it is exceedingly difficult to get the arc.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter" colspan="2"><img style="width:481px; height:223px" src="images/img885.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 20.</td> + <td class="caption sc">Fig. 21.</td></tr></table> + +<p>The potential difference between the terminals is affected by the +pressure of the gas. The most extensive series of experiments on +this point is that made by Duncan, Rowland, and Tod (<i>Electrician</i>, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page885" id="page885"></a>885</span> +31, p. 60), whose results are represented in fig. 20. We see from +these curves that for very short arcs the potential difference increases +continuously with the pressure, but for longer ones there is a critical +pressure at which the potential difference is a minimum, and that +this critical pressure seems to increase with the length of arc. +The nature of the gas also affects the potential difference. The +magnitude of this effect may be gathered from the following values +given by Arons (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 1, p. 700) for the potential difference +required to produce an arc 1.5 mm. long, carrying a current of 4.5 +amperes, between terminals of different metals in air and pure +nitrogen.</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Terminal.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Air.</td> <td class="tccm tb bb lb rb2">Nitrogen.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Terminal.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Air.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Nitrogen.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Ag</td> <td class="tcc rb">21</td> <td class="tcc rb2">?</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pt</td> <td class="tcc rb">36</td> <td class="tcc rb">30</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Zn</td> <td class="tcc rb">23</td> <td class="tcc rb2">21</td> <td class="tcl rb">Al</td> <td class="tcc rb">39</td> <td class="tcc rb">27</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Cd</td> <td class="tcc rb">25</td> <td class="tcc rb2">21</td> <td class="tcl rb">Pb</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">18</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">Cu</td> <td class="tcc rb">27</td> <td class="tcc rb2">30</td> <td class="tcl rb">Mg</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">22</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Fe</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">29</td> <td class="tcc rb2 bb">20</td> <td class="tcl rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb bb"> </td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">Thus, with the discharge for an arc of given length and current, +the nature of the terminals is the most important factor in determining +the potential difference. The effects produced by the pressure +and nature of the surrounding gas, although quite appreciable, are +not of so much importance, while in the spark discharge the nature +of the terminals is of no importance, everything depending upon +the nature and pressure of the gas.</p> + +<p>The potential gradient in the arc is very far from being uniform. +With carbon terminals Luggin (<i>Wien. Ber.</i> 98, p. 1192) found that, +with a current of 15 amperes, there was a fall of potential of 33.7 +close to the anode, and one 8.7 close to the cathode, so that the curve +representing the distribution of potential between the terminals +would be somewhat like that shown in fig. 21. We have seen that a +somewhat analogous distribution of potential holds in the case of +conduction through flames, though in that case the greatest drop of +potential is in general at the cathode and not at the anode. The +difference between the changes of potential at the anode and cathode +is not so large with Fe and Cu terminals as with carbon ones; +with mercury terminals, Arons (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 58, p. 73) found the anode +fall to be 7.4 volts, the cathode fall 5.4 volts.</p> +</div> + +<p>The case of the arc when the cathode is a pool of mercury and +the anode a metal wire placed in a vessel from which the air has +been exhausted is one which has attracted much attention, and +important investigations on this point have been made by +Hewitt (<i>Electrician</i>, 52, p. 447), Wills (<i>Electrician</i>, 54, p. 26), +Stark, Retschinsky and Schnaposnikoff (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 18, +p. 213) and Pollak (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 19, p. 217). In this arrangement +the mercury is vaporized by the heat, and the discharge +which passes through the mercury vapour gives an exceedingly +bright light, which has been largely used for lighting factories, &c. +The arrangement can also be used as a rectifier, for a current +will only pass through it when the mercury pool is the cathode. +Thus if such a lamp is connected with an alternating current +circuit, it lets through the current in one direction and stops +that in the other, thus furnishing a current which is always in +one direction.</p> + +<p><i>Theory of the Arc Discharge.</i>—An incandescent body such +as a piece of carbon even when at a temperature far below that +of the terminals in an arc, emits corpuscles at a rate corresponding +to a current of the order of 1 ampere per square centimetre of +incandescent surface, and as the rate of increase of emission +with the temperature is very rapid, it is probably at the rate +of many amperes per square centimetre at the temperature of +the negative carbon in the arc. If then a piece of carbon were +maintained at this temperature by some external means, and +used as a cathode, a current could be sent from it to another +electrode whether the second electrode were cold or hot. If, +however, these negatively electrified corpuscles did not produce +other ions either by collision with the gas through which they +move or with the anode, the spaces between cathode and anode +would have a negative charge, which would tend to stop the +corpuscles leaving the cathode and would require a large potential +difference between anode and cathode to produce any considerable +current. If, however, there is ionization either in the gas +or at the anode, the positive ions will diffuse into the region of +the discharge until they are sensibly equal in number to the +negative ions. When this is the case the back electromotive +force is destroyed and the same potential difference will carry +a much larger current. The arc discharge may be regarded as +analogous to the discharge between incandescent terminals, +the only difference being that in the arc the terminals are maintained +in the state of incandescence by the current and not by +external means. On this view the cathode is bombarded by +positive ions which heat it to such a temperature that negative +corpuscles sufficient to carry the current are emitted by it. +These corpuscles bombard the anode and keep it incandescent. +They ionize also, either directly by collision or indirectly by +heating the anode, the gas and vapour of the metal of which +the anode is made, and produce in this way the supply of positive +ions which keep the cathode hot.</p> + +<p><i>Discharge from a Point.</i>—A very interesting case of electric +discharge is that between a sharply pointed electrode, such as a +needle, and a metal surface of considerable area. At atmospheric +pressures the luminosity is confined to the immediate neighbourhood +of the point. If the sign of the potential of the point does +not change, the discharge is carried by ions of one sign—that of +the charge on the pointed electrode. The velocity of these ions +under a given potential gradient has been measured by Chattock +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 32, p. 285), and found to agree with that of the ions +produced by Röntgen or uranium radiation, while Townsend +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i> 195, p. 259) has shown that the charge on these +ions is the same as that on the ions streaming from the point. +If the pointed electrode be placed at right angles to a metal plane +serving as the other electrode, the discharge takes place when, for +a given distance of the point from the plane, the potential +difference between the electrodes exceeds a definite value +depending upon the pressure and nature of the gas through which +the discharge passes; its value also depends upon whether, +beginning with a small potential difference, we gradually increase +it until discharge commences, or, beginning with a large potential +difference, we decrease it until the discharge stops. The value +found by the latter method is less than that by the former. +According to Chattock’s measurements the potential difference V +for discharge between the point and the plate is given by the +linear relation V = a + bl, where l is the distance of the point from +the plate and a and b are constants. From v. Obermayer’s +(<i>Wien. Ber.</i> 100, 2, p. 127) experiments, in which the distance l +was greater than in Chattock’s, it would seem that the potential +for larger distances does not increase quite so rapidly with l as +is indicated by Chattock’s relation. The potential required to +produce this discharge is much less than that required to produce +a spark of length l between parallel plates; thus from Chattock’s +experiments to produce the point discharge when l = .5 cm. in air +at atmospheric pressure requires a potential difference of about +3800 volts when the pointed electrode is positive, while to +produce a spark at the same distance between plane electrodes +would require a potential difference of about 15,000 volts. +Chattock showed that with the same pointed electrode the value +of the electric intensity at the point was the same whatever the +distance of the point from the plane. The value of the electric +intensity depended upon the sharpness of the point. When the +end of the pointed electrode is a hemisphere of radius a, Chattock +showed that for the same gas at the same pressure the electric +intensity ∫ when discharge takes place is roughly proportioned to +a<span class="sp">−0.8</span>. The value of the electric intensity at the pointed electrode +is much greater than its value at a plane electrode for long +sparks; but we must remember that at a distance from a +pointed electrode equal to a small multiple of the radius of +curvature of its extremity the electric intensity falls very far +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page886" id="page886"></a>886</span> +below that required to produce discharge in a uniform field, so +that the discharge from a pointed electrode ought to be compared +with a spark whose length is comparable with the radius of +curvature of the point. For such short sparks the electric +intensity is very high. The electric intensity required to produce +the discharge from a gas diminishes as the pressure of the gas +diminishes, but not nearly so rapidly as the electric intensity for +long sparks. Here again the discharge from a point is comparable +with short sparks, which, as we have seen, are much less sensitive +to pressure changes than longer ones. The minimum potential at +which the electricity streams from the point does not depend +upon the material of which the point is made; it varies, however, +considerably with the nature of the gas. The following are the +results of some experiments on this point. Those in the first two +columns are due to Röntgen, those in the third and fourth to +Precht:—</p> + +<table class="ws" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td class="tccm allb" rowspan="2">Gas.</td> <td class="tccm allb" colspan="2">Discharge Potential. Point +.</td> + <td class="tccm allb" colspan="2">Pressure 760.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tccm allb">Pressure 205.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Pressure 110.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Point +.</td> <td class="tccm allb">Point −.</td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb"> </td> <td class="tcc rb">Volts.</td> <td class="tcc rb">Volts.</td> <td class="tcc rb">Volts.</td> <td class="tcc rb">Volts.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">H<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">1296</td> <td class="tcc rb">1174</td> <td class="tcc rb">2125</td> <td class="tcc rb">1550</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">O<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">2402</td> <td class="tcc rb">1975</td> <td class="tcc rb">2800</td> <td class="tcc rb">2350</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO</td> <td class="tcc rb">2634</td> <td class="tcc rb">2100</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CH<span class="su">4</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">2777</td> <td class="tcc rb">2317</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">NO</td> <td class="tcc rb">3188</td> <td class="tcc rb">2543</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">CO<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">3287</td> <td class="tcc rb">2655</td> <td class="tcc rb">3475</td> <td class="tcc rb">2100</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb">N<span class="su">2</span></td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb">2600</td> <td class="tcc rb">2000</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tcl lb rb bb">Air</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">..</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">2750</td> <td class="tcc rb bb">2050</td></tr> +</table> + +<p class="noind">We see from this table that in the case of the discharge from a +positively electrified point the greater the molecular weight of the +gas the greater the potential required for discharge. Röntgen +concluded from his experiments that the discharging potential +from a positive point in different gases at the same pressure +varies inversely as the mean free path of the molecules of the gas. +In the same gas, however, at different pressures the discharging +potential does not vary so quickly with the pressure as does the +mean free path. In Precht’s experiments, in which different +gases were used, the variations in the discharging potential +are not so great as the variations in the mean free path of the +gases.</p> + +<p>The current of electrified air flowing from the point when the +electricity is escaping—the well-known “electrical wind”—is +accompanied by a reaction on the point which tends to drive it +backwards. This reaction has been measured by Arrhenius +(<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 63, p. 305), who finds that when positive electricity is +escaping from a point in air the reaction on the point for a given +current varies inversely as the pressure of the gas, and for +different gases (air, hydrogen and carbonic acid) inversely as the +square root of the molecular weight of the gas. The reaction +when negative electricity is escaping is much less. The proportion +between the reactions for positive and negative currents depends +on the pressure of the gas. Thus for equal positive and negative +currents in air at a pressure of 70 cm. the reaction for a positive +point was 1.9 times that of a negative one, at 40 cm. pressure +2.6 times, at 20 cm. pressure 3.2 times, at 10.3 cm. pressure 7 +times, and at 5.1 cm. pressure 15 times the reaction for the +negative point. Investigation shows that the reaction should +be proportional to the quotient of the current by the velocity +acquired by an ion under unit potential gradient. Now this +velocity is inversely proportional to the pressure, so that the +reaction should on this view be directly proportional to the +pressure. This agrees with Arrhenius’ results when the point is +positive. Again, the velocities of an ion in hydrogen, air and +carbonic acid at the same pressure are approximately inversely +proportional to the square roots of their molecular weights, so +that the reaction should be directly proportional to this quantity. +This also agrees with Arrhenius’ results for the discharge from a +positive point. The velocity of the negative ion is greater than +that of a positive one under the same potential gradient, so that +the reaction for the negative point should be less than that for a +positive one, but the excess of the positive reaction over the +negative is much greater than that of the velocity of the negative +ion over the velocity of the positive. There is, however, reason to +believe that a considerable condensation takes place around the +negative ion as a nucleus after it is formed, so that the velocity of +the negative ion under a given potential gradient will be greater +immediately after the ion is formed than when it has existed for +some time. The measurements which have been made of the +velocities of the ions relate to those which have been some time in +existence, but a large part of the reaction will be due to the +newly-formed ions moving with a greater velocity, and thus +giving a smaller reaction than that calculated from the observed +velocity.</p> + +<p>With a given potential difference between the point and the +neighbouring conductor the current issuing from the point is +greater when the point is negative than when it is positive, except +in oxygen, when it is less. Warburg (<i>Sitz. Akad. d. Wissensch. +zu Berlin</i>, 1899, 50, p. 770) has shown that the addition of a +small quantity of oxygen to nitrogen produces a great diminution +in the current from a negative point, but has very little effect on +the discharge from a positive point. Thus the removal of a trace +of oxygen made a leak from a negative point 50 times what it was +before. Experiments with hydrogen and helium showed that +impurities in these gases had a great effect on the current when +the point was negative, and but little when it was positive. This +suggests that the impurities, by condensing round the negative +ions as nuclei, seriously diminish their velocity. If a point is +charged up to a high and rapidly alternating potential, such as +can be produced by the electric oscillations started when a Leyden +jar is discharged, then in hydrogen, nitrogen, ammonia and +carbonic acid gas a conductor placed in the neighbourhood of the +point gets a negative charge, while in air and oxygen it gets a +positive one. There are two considerations which are of importance +in connexion with this effect. The first is the velocity of +the ions in the electric field, and the second the ease with which +the ions can give up their charges to the metal point. The greater +velocity of the negative ions would, if the potential were rapidly +alternating, cause an excess of negative ions to be left in the +surrounding gas. This is the case in hydrogen. If, however, the +metal had a much greater tendency to unite with negative than +with positive ions, such as we should expect to be the case in +oxygen, this would act in the opposite direction, and tend to +leave an excess of positive ions in the gas.</p> + +<p><i>The Characteristic Curve for Discharge through Gases.</i>—When +a current of electricity passes through a metallic conductor the +relation between the current and the potential difference is the +exceedingly simple one expressed by Ohm’s law; the current +is proportional to the potential difference. When the current +passes through a gas there is no such simple relation. Thus we +have already mentioned cases where the current increased as the +potential increased although not in the same proportion, while +as we have seen in certain stages of the arc discharge the potential +difference diminishes as the current increases. Thus the problem +of finding the current which a given battery will produce when +part of the circuit consists of a gas discharge is much more +complicated than when the circuit consists entirely of metallic +conductors. If, however, we measure the potential difference +between the electrodes in the gas when different currents are +sent through it, we can plot a curve, called the “characteristic +curve,” whose ordinates are the potential differences between +the electrodes in the gas and the abscissae the corresponding +currents. By the aid of this curve we can calculate the current +produced when a given battery is connected up to the gas by +leads of known resistance.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>For let E<span class="su">0</span> be the electromotive force of the battery, R the resistance +of the leads, i the current, the potential difference between +the terms in the gas will be E<span class="su">0</span> − Ri. Let ABC (fig. 22) be the +“characteristic curve,” the ordinates being the potential difference +between the terminals in the gas, and the abscissae the current. +Draw the line LM whose equation is E = E<span class="su">0</span> − Ri, then the points +where this line cuts the characteristic curves will give possible +values of i and E, the current through the discharge tube and the +potential difference between the terminals. Some of these points +may, however, correspond to an unstable position and be impossible +to realize. The following method gives us a criterion by which we +can distinguish the stable from the unstable positions. If the current +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page887" id="page887"></a>887</span> +is increased by δi, the electromotive force which has to be overcome +by the battery is Rδi + (dE/di)δi. If R + dE/di is positive there will +be an unbalanced electromotive force round the circuit tending to +stop the current. Thus the increase in the current will be stopped +and the condition will be a stable one. If, however, R + dE/di is +negative there will be an unbalanced +electromotive force +tending to increase the current +still further; thus the current +will go on increasing and the +condition will be unstable. +Thus for stability R + dE/di +must be positive, a condition +first given by Kaufmann (<i>Ann. +der Phys.</i> 11, p. 158). The +geometrical interpretation of +this condition is that the +straight line LM must, at the +point where it cuts the characteristic +curve, be steeper +than the tangent to characteristic +curve. Thus of the points +ABC where the line cuts the curve in fig. 22, A and C correspond +to stable states and B to an unstable one. The state of things +represented by a point P on the characteristic curve when the slope +is downward cannot be stable unless there is in the external circuit +a resistance greater than that represented by the tangent of the +inclination of the tangent to the curve at P to the horizontal axis.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 330px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:279px; height:227px" src="images/img887a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 22.</td></tr></table> + +<p>If we keep the external electromotive force the same and gradually +increase the resistance in the leads, the line LM will become steeper +and steeper. C will move to the left so that the current will diminish; +when the line gets so steep that it touches the curve at C’, any +further increase in the resistance will produce an abrupt change in +the current; for now the state of things represented by a point near +A’ is the only stable state. Thus if the BC part of the curve corresponded +to a luminous discharge and the A part to a dark discharge, +we see that if the electromotive force is kept constant there is a +minimum value of the current for the luminous discharge. If the +current is reduced below this value, the discharge ceases to be +luminous, and there is an abrupt diminution in the current.</p> +</div> + +<p style="clear: both;"><i>Cathode Rays.</i>—When the gas in the discharge tube is at a +very low pressure some remarkable phenomena occur in the +neighbourhood of the cathode. These seem to have been first +observed by Plücker (<i>Pogg. Ann.</i> 107, p. 77; 116, p. 45) who +noticed on the walls of the glass tube near the cathode a greenish +phosphorescence, which he regarded as due to rays proceeding +from the cathode, striking against the sides of the tube, and then +travelling back to the cathode. He found that the action of a +magnet on these rays was not the same as the action on the +part of the discharge near the positive electrode. Hittorf (<i>Pogg. +Ann.</i> 136, p. 8) showed that the agent producing the phosphorescence +was intercepted by a solid, whether conductor or insulator, +placed between the cathode and the sides of the tube. He +regarded the phosphorescence as caused by a motion starting +from the cathode and travelling in straight lines through the gas. +Goldstein (<i>Monat. der Berl. Akad.</i>, 1876, p. 24) confirmed this +discovery of Hittorf’s, and further showed that a distinct, +though not very sharp, shadow is cast by a small object placed +near a large plane cathode. This is a proof that the rays producing +the phosphorescence must be emitted almost normally +from the cathode, and not, like the rays of light from a luminous +surface, in all directions, for such rays would not produce a +perceptible shadow if a small body were placed near the plane. +Goldstein regarded the phosphorescence as due to waves in the +ether, for whose propagation the gas was not necessary. Crookes +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1879, pt. i. p. 135; pt. ii. pp. 587, 661), who made +many remarkable researches in this subject, took a different +view. He regarded the rays as streams of negatively electrified +particles projected normally from the cathode with great velocity, +and, when the pressure is sufficiently low, reaching the sides of +the tube, and by their impact producing phosphorescence and +heat. The rays on this view are deflected by a magnet, because +a magnet exerts a force on a charged moving body.</p> + +<p>These rays striking against glass make it phosphorescent. +The colour of the phosphorescence depends on the kind of glass; +thus the light from soda glass is a yellowish green, and that from +lead glass blue. Many other bodies phosphoresce when exposed +to these rays, and in particular the phosphorescence of some +gems, such as rubies and diamonds, is exceedingly vivid. The +spectrum of the phosphorescent light is generally continuous, +but Crookes showed that the phosphorescence of some of the +rare earths, such as yttrium, gives a spectrum of bright bands, +and he founded on this fact a spectroscopic method of great +importance. Goldstein (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 54, p. 371) discovered +that the haloid salts of the alkali metals change colour under +the rays, sodium chloride, for example, becoming violet. The +coloration is a surface one, and has been traced by E. Wiedemann +and Schmidt (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 54, p. 618) to the formation of a subchloride. +Chlorides of tin, mercury and lead also change colour in +the same way. E. Wiedemann (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 56, p. 201) discovered +another remarkable effect, which he called thermo-luminescence; +he found that many bodies after being exposed to the cathode +rays possess for some time the power of becoming luminous +when their temperature is raised to a point far below that at +which they become luminous in the normal state. Substances +belonging to the class called by van ’t Hoff solid solutions exhibit +this property of thermo-luminescence to a remarkable extent. +They are formed when two salts, one greatly in excess of the +other, are simultaneously precipitated from a solution. A trace +of MnSO<span class="su">4</span> in CaSO<span class="su">4</span> shows very brilliant thermo-luminescence. +The impact of cathode rays produces after a time perceptible +changes in the glass. Crookes (<i>Phil. Trans.</i> pt. ii. 1879, p. 645) +found that after glass has been phosphorescing for some time +under the cathode rays it seems to get tired, and the phosphorescence +is not so +bright as it was +initially. Thus, for +example, when the +shadow of a Maltese +cross is thrown +on the walls of the +tube as in fig. 23, +if after the discharge +has been +going on for some +time the cross is +shaken down or a +new cathode used +whose line of fire does not cut the cross, the pattern of the cross +will still be seen on the glass, but it will now be brighter instead +of darker than the surrounding portion. The portions shielded +by the cross, not being tired by being made to phosphoresce +for a long time, respond more vigorously to the stimulus than +those portions which have not been protected. Skinner (<i>Proc. +Camb. Phil. Soc.</i> ix. p. 371) and Thomson found on the glass +which had been exposed to the rays gelatinous filaments, apparently +silica, resulting from the reduction of the glass. A reducing +action was also noticed by Villard (<i>Journ. de phys.</i> 3, viii. +p. 140) and Wehnelt (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 67, p. 421). It can be well +shown by letting the rays fall on a plate of oxidized copper, +when the part struck by the rays will become bright. The +rays heat bodies on which they fall, and if they are concentrated +by using as a cathode a portion of a spherical surface, the heat +at the centre becomes so great that a piece of platinum wire can +be melted or a diamond charred. Measurements of the heating +effects of the rays have been made by Thomson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> +[5], 44, p. 293) and Cady (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 1, p. 678). Crookes +(<i>Phil. Trans.</i>, 1879, pt. i. p. 152) showed that a vane mounted +as in a radiometer is set in rotation by the rays, the direction of +the rotation being the same as would be produced by a stream +of particles proceeding from the cathode. The movement is +not due to the momentum imparted to the vanes by the rays, +but to the difference in temperature between the sides of the +vanes, the rays making the side against which they strike +hotter than the other.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: right; width: 410px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figright1"><img style="width:359px; height:227px" src="images/img887b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 22.</td></tr></table> + +<p><i>Effect of a Magnet.</i>—The rays are deflected by a magnet, +so that the distribution of phosphorescence over the glass and +the shape and position of the shadows cast by bodies in the tube +are altered by the proximity of a magnet. The laws of magnetic +deflection of these rays have been investigated by Plücker (<i>Pogg.</i> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page888" id="page888"></a>888</span> +<i>Ann.</i> 103, p. 88), Hittorf (<i>Pogg. Ann.</i> 136, p. 213), Crookes (<i>Phil. +Trans.</i>, 1879, pt. 1, p. 557), and Schuster (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 47, p. +526). The deflection is the same as that of negatively electrified +particles travelling along the path of the rays. Such particles +would in a magnetic field be acted on by a force at right angles +to the direction of motion of the particle and also to the magnetic +force, the magnitude of the force being proportional to the +product of the velocity of the particle, the magnetic force, and +the sine of the angle between these vectors. In this case we have +seen that if the particle is not acted on by an electrostatic field, +the path in a uniform magnetic field is a spiral, which, if the +magnetic force is at right angles to the direction of projection +of the particle, becomes a circle in the plane at right angles to +the magnetic force, the radius being mv/He, where m, v, e are +respectively the mass, velocity and charge on the particle, and +H is the magnetic force. The smaller the difference of potential +between the electrodes of the discharge tube the greater the +deflection produced by a magnetic field of given strength, and as +the difference of potential rapidly increases with diminution of +pressure, after a certain pressure has been passed, the higher +the exhaustion of the tube the less the magnetic deflection of +the rays. Birkeland (<i>Comptes rendus</i>, 1896, p. 492) has shown +that when the discharge is from an induction coil the cathode +rays produced in the tube at any one time are not equally +deflected by a magnet, but that a narrow patch of phosphorescence +when deflected by a magnet is split up into several distinct +patches, giving rise to what Birkeland calls the “magnetic +spectrum.” Strutt (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 48, p. 478) has shown that this +magnetic spectrum does not occur if the discharge of a large +number of cells is employed instead of the coil. Thomson (<i>Proc. +Camb. Phil. Soc.</i> 9, p. 243) has shown that if the potential +difference between the electrodes is kept the same the magnetic +deflection is independent of the nature of the gas filling the +discharge tube; this was tested with gases so different as air, +hydrogen, carbonic acid and methyl iodide.</p> + +<p><i>Charge of Negative Electricity carried by the Rays.</i>—We have +seen that the rays are deflected by a magnet, as if they were +particles charged with negative electricity. Perrin (<i>Comptes +rendus</i>, 121, p. 1130) showed by direct experiment that a stream +of negative electricity is associated with the rays. A modification +made by Thomson of Perrin’s experiment is sketched in +fig. 24 (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 48, p. 478).</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 340px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:291px; height:359px" src="images/img888.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 24.</td></tr></table> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>The rays start from the cathode A, and pass through a slit in a +solid brass rod B fitting tightly into the neck of the tube. This +rod is connected with earth and used as the anode. The rays after +passing through the slit travel through the vessel C. D and E are +two insulated metal cylinders +insulated from each other, +and each having a slit cut in +its face so as to enable the +rays to pass into the inside of +the inner cylinder, which is +connected with an electrometer, +the outer cylinder +being connected with the +earth. The two cylinders are +placed on the far side of the +vessel, but out of the direct +line of fire of the rays. When +the rays go straight through +the slit there is only a very +small negative charge communicated +to the inner +cylinder, but when they are +deflected by a magnet so that +the phosphorescent patch falls +on the slit in the outer +cylinder the inner cylinder +receives a very large negative +charge, the increase coinciding +very sharply with the appearance of the phosphorescent patch on the +slit. When the patch is so much deflected by the magnet that it +falls below the slit, the negative charge in the cylinder again disappears. +This experiment shows that the cathode rays are accompanied +by a stream of negative electrification. The same apparatus +can be used to show that the passage of cathode rays through a +gas makes it a conductor of electricity. For if the induction coil is +kept running and a stream of the rays kept steadily going into the +inner cylinder, the potential of the inner cylinder reaches a definite +negative value below which it does not fall, however long the rays +may be kept going. The cylinder reaches a steady state in which +the gain of negative electricity from the cathode rays is equal to the +loss by leakage through the conducting gas, the conductivity being +produced by the passage of the rays through it. If the inner cylinder +is charged up initially with a greater negative charge than corresponds +to the steady state, on turning the rays on to the cylinder the negative +charge will decrease and not increase until it reaches the steady +state. The conductivity produced by the passage of cathode rays +through a gas diminishes rapidly with the pressure. When rays +pass through a gas at a low pressure, they are deflected by an electric +field; when the pressure of the gas is higher the conductivity it +acquires when the cathode rays pass through it is so large that the +potential gradient cannot reach a sufficiently high value to produce +an appreciable deflection.</p> +</div> + +<p>Thus the cathode rays carry a charge of negative electricity; +the experiment described on page 875 (fig. 13) shows that they +are deflected by an electric field as if they were negatively +electrified, and are acted on by a magnetic force in just the way +this force would act on a negatively electrified body moving +along the path of the rays. There is therefore every reason for +believing that they are charges of negative electricity in rapid +motion. By measuring the deflection produced by magnetic +and electric fields we can determine the velocity with which +these particles moved and the ratio of the mass of the particle +to the charge carried by it.</p> + +<p>We may conclude from the experiments that the value of m/e +for the particles constituting the cathode rays is of the order +1/1.7×10<span class="sp">7</span>, and we have seen that m/e has the same value in +all the other cases of negative ions in a gas at low pressure for +which it has been measured—viz. for the ions produced when +ultra-violet light falls on a metal plate, or when an incandescent +carbon filament is surrounded by a gas at a low pressure, and +for the β particles given out by radio-active bodies. We have +also seen that the value of the charge on the gaseous ion, in all +cases in which it has been measured—viz. the ions produced by +Röntgen and uranium radiation, by ultra-violet light, and by the +discharge of electrification from a point—is the same in magnitude +as the charge carried by the hydrogen atom in the electrolysis +of solutions. The mass of the hydrogen alone is, however, +10<span class="sp">-4</span> times this charge, while the mass of the carriers of negative +electrification is only 1/1.7×10<span class="sp">7</span> times the charge; hence the +mass of the carriers of the negative electrification is only <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">1700</span> of +the mass of the hydrogen atom. We are thus, by the study of the +electric discharge, forced to recognize the existence of masses +very much smaller than the smallest mass hitherto recognized.</p> + +<div class="condensed"> +<p>Direct determinations of the velocity of the cathode rays have +been made by J. J. Thomson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 38, p. 358), who measured +the interval between the appearance of phosphorescence on two +pieces of glass placed at a known distance apart, and by Maiorana +(<i>Nuovo Cimento</i>, 4, 6, p. 336) and Battelli and Stefanini (<i>Phys. Zeit.</i> +1, p. 51), who measured the interval between the arrival of the +negative charge carried by the rays at two places separated by a +known distance. The values of the velocity got in this way are much +smaller than the values got by the indirect methods previously +described: thus J. J. Thomson at a fairly high pressure found the +velocity to be 2×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm./sec. Maiorana found values ranging +between 10<span class="sp">7</span> and 6×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm./sec, and Battelli and Stefanini values +ranging from 6×10<span class="sp">6</span> to 1.2×10<span class="sp">7</span>. In these methods it is very +difficult to eliminate the effect of the interval which elapses between +the arrival of the rays and the attainment by the means of detection, +such as the phosphorescence of the glass or the deflection of the +electrometer, of sufficient intensity to affect the senses.</p> +</div> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: left; width: 260px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figleft1"><img style="width:213px; height:89px" src="images/img889a.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 25.</td></tr></table> + +<p><i>Transmission of Cathode Rays through Solids—Lenard Rays.</i>—It +was for a long time believed that all solids were absolutely +opaque to these rays, as Crookes and Goldstein had proved that +very thin glass, and even a film of collodion, cast intensely black +shadows. Hertz (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 45, p. 28), however, showed that +behind a piece of gold-leaf or aluminium foil an appreciable +amount of phosphorescence occurred on the glass, and that the +phosphorescence moved when a magnet was brought near. A +most important advance was next made by Lenard (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> +51, p. 225), who got the cathode rays to pass from the +inside of a discharge tube to the air outside. For this purpose he +used a tube like that shown in fig. 25. The cathode K is an +aluminium disc 1.2 cm. in diameter fastened to a stiff wire, which +is surrounded by a glass tube. The anode A is a brass strip partly +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page889" id="page889"></a>889</span> +surrounding the cathode. The end of the tube in front of the +cathode is closed by a strong metal cap, fastened in with marine +glue, in the middle of which a hole 1.7 mm. in diameter is bored, +and covered with a piece of very thin aluminium foil about +.0026 mm. in thickness. The aluminium window is in metallic +contact with the cap, and this and the anode are connected with +the earth. The tube is then exhausted until the cathode rays +strike against the window. Diffuse light spreads from the +window into the air outside the tube, and can be traced in a dark +room for a distance of several centimetres. From the window, +too, proceed rays which, like the cathode rays, can produce +phosphorescence, for certain bodies phosphoresce when placed +in the neighbourhood of the window. This effect is conveniently +observed by the platino-cryanide screens used to detect Röntgen +radiation. The properties of the rays outside the tube resemble +in all respects those of cathode rays; +they are deflected by a magnet and +by an electric field, they ionize the +gas through which they pass and make +it a conductor of electricity, and they +affect a photographic plate and change +the colour of the haloid salts of +the alkali metals. As, however, it is convenient to distinguish +between cathode rays outside and inside the tube, we shall call +the former Lenard rays. In air at atmospheric pressure the +Lenard rays spread out very diffusely. If the aluminium +window, instead of opening into the air, opens into another tube +which can be exhausted, it is found that the lower the pressure of +the gas in this tube the farther the rays travel and the less diffuse +they are. By filling the tube with different gases Lenard showed +that the greater the density of the gas the greater is the absorption +of these rays. Thus they travel farther in hydrogen than in +any other gas at the same pressure. Lenard showed, too, that if +he adjusted the pressure so that the density of the gas in this tube +was the same—if, for example, the pressure when the tube was +filled with oxygen was <span class="spp">1</span>⁄<span class="suu">16</span> of the pressure when it was filled with +hydrogen—the absorption was constant whatever the nature of +the gas. Becker (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 17, p. 381) has shown that this +law is only approximately true, the absorption by hydrogen +being abnormally large, and by the inert monatomic gases, such +as helium and argon, abnormally small. The distance to which +the Lenard rays penetrate into this tube depends upon the +pressure in the discharge tube; if the exhaustion in the latter is +very high, so that there is a large potential difference between +the cathode and the anode, and therefore a high velocity for the +cathode rays, the Lenard rays will penetrate farther than when +the pressure in the discharge tube is higher and the velocity of the +cathode rays smaller. Lenard showed that the greater the +penetrating power of his rays the smaller was their magnetic +deflection, and therefore the greater their velocity; thus the +greater the velocity of the cathode rays the greater is the velocity +of the Lenard rays to which they give rise. For very slow +cathode rays the absorption by different gases departs altogether +from the density law, so much so that the absorption of these rays +by hydrogen is greater than that by air (Lenard, <i>Ann. der Phys.</i> +12, p. 732). Lenard (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 56, p. 255) studied the passage of +his rays through solids as well as through gases, and arrived at +the very interesting result that the absorption of a substance +depends only upon its density, and not upon its chemical composition +or physical state; in other words, the amount of +absorption of the rays when they traverse a given distance +depends only on the quantity of matter they cut through in the +distance. McClelland (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 61, p. 227) showed that +the rays carry a charge of negative electricity, and M’Lennan +measured the amount of ionization rays of given intensity +produced in different gases, finding that if the pressure is adjusted +so that the density of the different gases is the same the number +of ions per cubic centimetre is also the same. In this case, as +Lenard has shown, the absorption is the same, so that with the +Lenard rays, as with uranium and probably with Röntgen +rays, equal absorption corresponds to equal ionization. A +convenient method for producing Lenard rays of great +intensity has been described by Des Coudres (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> +62, p. 134).</p> + +<p><i>Diffuse Reflection of Cathode Rays.</i>—When cathode rays fall +upon a surface, whether of an insulator or a conductor, cathode +rays start from the surface in all directions. This phenomenon, +which was discovered by Goldstein (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 62, p. 134), has +been investigated by Starke (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 66, p. 49; <i>Ann. der +Phys.</i> 111, p. 75), Austin and Starke (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 9, p. 271), +Campbell-Swinton (<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 64, p. 377), Merritt (<i>Phys. +Rev.</i> 7, p. 217) and Gehrcke (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 8, p. 81); it is often +regarded as analogous to the diffuse reflection of light from such +a surface as gypsum, and is spoken of as the diffuse reflection of +the cathode rays. According to Merritt and Austin and Starke +the deviation in a magnetic field of these reflected rays is the same +as that of the incident rays. The experiments, however, were +confined to rays reflected so that the angle of reflection was +nearly equal to that of incidence. Gehrcke showed that among +the reflected rays there were a large number which had a much +smaller velocity than the incident ones. According to Campbell-Swinton +the “diffuse” reflection is accompanied by a certain +amount of “specular” reflection. Lenard, who used slower +cathode rays than Austin and Starke, could not detect in the +scattered rays any with velocities comparable with that of the +incident rays; he obtained copious supplies of slow rays whose +speed did not depend on the angle of incidence of the primary +rays (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 15, p. 485). When the angle of incidence +is very oblique the surface struck by the rays gets positively +charged, showing that the secondary rays are more numerous +than the primary.</p> + +<p><i>Repulsion of two Cathode Streams.</i>—Goldstein discovered that +if in a tube there are two cathodes connected together, the +cathodic rays from one cathode are deflected when they pass +near the other. Experiments bearing on this subject have been +made by Crookes and Wiedemann and Ebert. The phenomena +may be described by saying that the repulsion of the rays from +a cathode A by a cathode B is only appreciable when the rays +from A pass through the Crookes dark space round B. This is +what we should expect if we remember that the electric field in +the dark space is far stronger than in the rest of the discharge, +and that the gas in the other parts of the tube is rendered a +conductor by the passage through it of the cathode rays, and +therefore incapable of transmitting electrostatic repulsion.</p> + +<p>Scattering of the Negative Electrodes.—In addition to the +cathode rays, portions of metal start normally from the cathode +and form a metallic deposit on the walls of the tube. The +amount of this deposit varies very much with the metal. Crookes +(<i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i> 50, p. 88) found that the quantities of metal +torn from electrodes of the same size, in equal times, by the +same current, are in the order Pd, Au, Ag, Pb, Sn, Pt, Cu, Cd, +Ni, In, Fe.... In air there is very little deposit from an Al +cathode, but it is abundant in tubes filled with the monatomic +gases, mercury vapour, argon or helium. The scattering +increases as the density of the gas diminishes. The particles +of metal are at low pressures deflected by a magnet, though not +nearly to the same extent as the cathode rays. According to +Grandquist, the loss of weight of the cathode in a given time is +proportional to the square of the current; it is therefore not, +like the loss of the cathode in ordinary electrolysis, proportional +to the quantity of current which passes through it.</p> + +<table class="nobctr" style="float: right; width: 330px;" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figright1"><img style="width:277px; height:138px" src="images/img889b.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 26.</td></tr></table> + +<p><i>Positive Rays or “Canalstrahlen.”</i>—Goldstein (<i>Berl. Sitzungsb.</i> +39, p. 691) found that with a perforated cathode certain +rays occurred behind the +cathode which were not +appreciably deflected by a +magnet; these he called +Canalstrahlen, but we shall, +for reasons which will appear +later, call them “positive +rays.”</p> + +<p>Their appearance is well +shown in fig. 26, taken from a paper by Wehnelt (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> +67, p. 421) in which they are represented at B. Goldstein found +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page890" id="page890"></a>890</span> +that their colour depends on the gas in which they are +formed, being gold-colour in air and nitrogen, rose-colour in +hydrogen, yellowish rose in oxygen, and greenish gray in +carbonic acid.</p> + +<p>The colour of the luminosity due to <span class="correction" title="amended from postive">positive</span> rays is not in +general the same as that due to anode rays; the difference is +exceptionally well marked in helium, where the cathode ray +luminosity is blue while that due to the positive rays is red. +The luminosity produced when the rays strike against solids +is also quite distinct. The cathode rays make the body emit +a continuous spectrum, while the spectrum produced by the +positive rays often shows bright lines. Thus lithium chloride +under cathode rays gives out a steely blue light and the spectrum +is continuous, while under the positive rays the salt gives out a +brilliant red light and the spectrum shows the red helium line. +It is remarkable that the lines on the spectra of the alkali metals +are much more easily produced when the positive rays fall on +the oxide of the metal than when they fall on the metal itself. +Thus when the positive rays fall on a pool of the liquid alloy +of sodium and potassium the specks of oxide on the surface +shine with a bright yellow light while the untarnished part of +the surface is quite dark.</p> + +<p>W. Wien (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 65, p. 445) measured the values of +e/m for the particles forming the positive rays. Other measurements +have been made by Ewers (<i>Wied. Ann.</i> 69, p. 167) and +J. J. Thomson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 13, p. 561). The differences between +the values of e/m for the cathode and positive rays are very +remarkable. For cathode rays whose velocity does not approach +that of light, e/m is always equal to 1.7×10<span class="sp">8</span>, while for the positive +rays the greatest value of this quantity yet observed is 10<span class="sp">4</span>, +which is also the value of e/m for the hydrogen ions in the electrolysis +of dilute solutions. In some experiments made by J. J. +Thomson (<i>Phil. Mag.</i>, 14, p. 359) it was found that when the +pressure of the gas was not too low the bright spot produced by +the impact of a pencil of these rays on a phosphorescent screen +is deflected by electric and magnetic forces into a continuous +band extending on both sides of the undeflected position. The +portion on one side is in general much fainter than that on the +other. The direction of this deflection shows that it is produced +by particles charged with negative electricity, while the brighter +band is due to particles charged with positive electricity. The +negatively electrified particles which produce the band c.c are +not corpuscles, for from the electric and magnetic deflections +we can find the value of e/m. As this proves to be equal to 10<span class="sp">4</span>, +we see that the mass of the carrier of the negative charge is +comparable with that of an atom, and so very much greater +than that of a corpuscle. At very low pressures part of the +phosphorescence disappears, while the upper portion breaks up +into two patches (fig. 27). For one of these the maximum value +of e/m is 10<span class="sp">4</span> and for the other 5×10<span class="sp">3</span>. At low pressures the +appearance of the patches and the values of e/m are the same +whether the tube is filled originally with air, hydrogen or +helium. In some of the experiments the tube was exhausted +until the pressure was too low to allow the discharge to pass. +A very small quantity of the gas under investigation was then +admitted into the tube, just sufficient to allow the discharge to +pass, and the deflection of the phosphorescent patch measured. +The following gases were admitted into the tube, air, carbonic +oxide, oxygen, hydrogen, helium, argon and neon, but whatever +the gas the appearance of the phosphorescence was the same; +in every case there were two patches, for one of which e/m = 10<span class="sp">4</span> +and for the other e/m = 5×10<span class="sp">3</span>. In helium at higher pressures +another patch was observed, for which e/m = 2.5×10<span class="sp">8</span>. The +continuous band into which the phosphorescent spot is drawn +out when the pressure is not exceedingly low, which involves +the existence of particles for which the mean value of e/m varies +from zero to 10<span class="sp">4</span>, can be explained as follows. The rays on their +way to the phosphorescent screen have to pass through gas +which is ionized by the passage through it of the positive rays; +this gas will therefore contain free corpuscles. The particles +which constitute the rays start with a charge of positive electricity. +Some of these particles in their journey through the +gas attract a corpuscle whose negative charge neutralizes the +positive charge on the particle. The particles when in this +neutral state may be ionized by collision and reacquire a positive +charge, or by attracting another particle may become negatively +charged, and this process may be repeated several times on their +journey to the phosphorescent screen. Thus some of the particles, +instead of being positively charged for the whole of the time +they are exposed to the electric and magnetic forces, may be +for a part of that time without a charge or even have a negative +charge. The deflection of a particle is proportional to the +average value of its charge whilst under the influence of the +deflecting forces. Thus if a particle is without a charge for a +part of the time, its deflection will be less than that of a particle +which has retained its positive charge for the whole of its journey, +while the few particles which have a negative charge for a +longer time than they have a positive will be deflected in the +opposite direction to the main portion and will produce the tail +(fig. 27).</p> + +<table class="nobctr" summary="Illustration"> +<tr><td class="figcenter"><img style="width:488px; height:76px" src="images/img890.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr> +<tr><td class="caption sc">Fig. 27.</td></tr></table> + +<p>A similar explanation will apply to the positive rays discovered +by Villard (<i>Comptes rendus</i>, 143, p. 674) and J. J. Thomson +(<i>Phil. Mag.</i> 13, p. 359), which travel in the opposite direction to +the rays we have been considering, <i>i.e.</i> they travel away from the +cathode and in the direction of the cathode’s rays; these rays +are sometimes called “retrograde” rays. These as far as has +been observed have always the same maximum value of e/m, +<i>i.e.</i> 10<span class="sp">4</span>, and there are a considerable number of negative ones +always mixed with them. The maximum velocity of both the +positive and retrograde rays is about 2×10<span class="sp">8</span> cm./sec. and varies +very little with the potential difference between the electrodes +in the tube in which they are produced (J. J. Thomson, <i>Phil. +Mag.</i>, Dec. 1909).</p> + +<p>The positive rays show, when the pressure is not very low, the +line spectrum of the gas through which they pass. An exceedingly +valuable set of observations on this point have been made +by Stark and his pupils (<i>Physik. Zeit.</i> 6, p. 892; <i>Ann. der +Phys.</i> 21, pp. 40, 457). Stark has shown that in many gases, +notably hydrogen, the spectrum shows the Doppler effect, and he +has been able to calculate in this way the velocity of the positive +rays.</p> + +<p><i>Anode Rays.</i>—Gehrcke and Reichenhein (<i>Ann. der Phys.</i> 25, +p. 861) have found that when the anode consists of a <span class="correction" title="amended from mixure">mixture</span> of +sodium and lithium chloride raised to a high temperature either +by the discharge itself or by an independent heating circuit, very +conspicuous rays come from the anode when the pressure of the +gas in the discharge tube is very low, and a large coil is used to +produce the discharge. The determination of e/m for these rays +showed that they are positively charged atoms of sodium or +lithium, moving with very considerable velocity; in some of +Gehrcke’s experiments the maximum velocity was as great as +1.8×10<span class="sp">7</span> cm./sec. though the average was about 10<span class="sp">7</span> cm./sec. +These velocities are less than those of the positive rays whose +maximum velocity is about 2×10<span class="sp">8</span> cm./sec.</p> +<div class="author">(J. J. T.)</div> + +<hr class="foot" /> +<div class="note"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_1" id="Footnote_1" href="#FnAnchor_1"><span class="fn">1</span></a> The values for nickel and bismuth given in the table are much +higher than later values obtained with pure electrolytic nickel and +bismuth.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_2" id="Footnote_2" href="#FnAnchor_2"><span class="fn">2</span></a> The value here given, namely 12.885, for the electric mass-resistivity +of liquid mercury as determined by Matthiessen is now +known to be too high by nearly 1%. The value at present accepted +is 12.789 ohms per metre-gramme at 0° C.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_3" id="Footnote_3" href="#FnAnchor_3"><span class="fn">3</span></a> The value (1630) here given for hard-drawn copper is about +¼% higher than the value now adopted, namely, 1626. The difference +is due to the fact that either Jenkin or Matthiessen did not +employ precisely the value at present employed for the density of +hard-drawn and annealed copper in calculating the volume-resistivities +from the mass-resistivities.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_4" id="Footnote_4" href="#FnAnchor_4"><span class="fn">4</span></a> Matthiessen’s value for nickel is much greater than that obtained +in more recent researches. (See Matthiessen and Vogt, <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, +1863, and J. A. Fleming, <i>Proc. Roy. Soc.</i>, December 1899.)</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_5" id="Footnote_5" href="#FnAnchor_5"><span class="fn">5</span></a> Matthiessen’s value for mercury is nearly 1% greater than the +value adopted at present as the mean of the best results, namely +94,070.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_6" id="Footnote_6" href="#FnAnchor_6"><span class="fn">6</span></a> The samples of silver, copper and nickel employed for these tests +were prepared electrolytically by Sir J. W. Swan, and were exceedingly +pure and soft. The value for volume-resistivity of nickel as +given in the above table (from experiments by J. A. Fleming, <i>Proc. +Roy. Soc.</i>, December 1899) is much less (nearly 40%) than the value +given by Matthiessen’s researches.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_7" id="Footnote_7" href="#FnAnchor_7"><span class="fn">7</span></a> The electrolytic bismuth here used was prepared by Hartmann +and Braun, and the resistivity taken by J. A. Fleming. The value +is nearly 20% less than that given by Matthiessen.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_8" id="Footnote_8" href="#FnAnchor_8"><span class="fn">8</span></a> In 1899 a committee was formed of representatives from eight +of the leading manufacturers of insulated copper cables with delegates +from the Post Office and Institution of Electrical Engineers, to +consider the question of the values to be assigned to the resistivity +of hard-drawn and annealed copper. The sittings of the committee +were held in London, the secretary being A. H. Howard. The values +given in the above paragraphs are in accordance with the decision +of this committee, and its recommendations have been accepted by +the General Post Office and the leading manufacturers of insulated +copper wire and cables.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_9" id="Footnote_9" href="#FnAnchor_9"><span class="fn">9</span></a> Platinoid is an alloy introduced by Martino, said to be similar +in composition to German silver, but with a little tungsten added. +It varies a good deal in composition according to manufacture, and +the resistivity of different specimens is not identical. Its electric properties +were first made known by J. T. Bottomley, in a paper read +at the Royal Society, May 5, 1885.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_10" id="Footnote_10" href="#FnAnchor_10"><span class="fn">10</span></a> An equivalent gramme molecule is a weight in grammes equal +numerically to the chemical equivalent of the salt. For instance, one +equivalent gramme molecule of sodium chloride is a mass of 58.5 +grammes. NaCl = 58.5.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_11" id="Footnote_11" href="#FnAnchor_11"><span class="fn">11</span></a> F. Kohlrausch and L. Holborn, <i>Das Leitvermögen der Elektrolyte</i> +(Leipzig, 1898).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_12" id="Footnote_12" href="#FnAnchor_12"><span class="fn">12</span></a> It should be noticed that the velocities calculated in Kohlrausch’s +theory and observed experimentally are the average velocities, and +involve both the factors mentioned above; they include the time +wasted by the ions in combination with each other, and, except at +great dilution, are less than the velocity with which the ions move +when free from each other.</p> + +</div> + + +<hr class="art" /> + + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th +Edition, Volume 6, Slice 8, by Various + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENCYC. BRITANNICA, VOL 6, SL 8 *** + +***** This file should be named 32063-h.htm or 32063-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/2/0/6/32063/ + +Produced by Marius Masi, Don Kretz, Juliet Sutherland, and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/32063-h/images/img861a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img861a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..63445df --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img861a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img861b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img861b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6fd4332 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img861b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img862.jpg b/32063-h/images/img862.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..26e63da --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img862.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img865.jpg b/32063-h/images/img865.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..018e005 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img865.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img866a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img866a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ddff61e --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img866a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img866b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img866b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..259a142 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img866b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img868a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img868a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..720488c --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img868a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img868b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img868b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..41d85c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img868b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img868c.jpg b/32063-h/images/img868c.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7bb486 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img868c.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img871.jpg b/32063-h/images/img871.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb7926c --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img871.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img872.jpg b/32063-h/images/img872.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..629b8eb --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img872.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img875.jpg b/32063-h/images/img875.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ffefda1 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img875.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img877.jpg b/32063-h/images/img877.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5dcafeb --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img877.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img881a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img881a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ee913 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img881a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img881b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img881b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..aa14664 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img881b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img883.jpg b/32063-h/images/img883.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8599cec --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img883.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img884a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img884a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fdb392 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img884a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img884b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img884b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b8935f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img884b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img885.jpg b/32063-h/images/img885.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c6c2e12 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img885.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img887a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img887a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..db2762a --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img887a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img887b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img887b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..453b955 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img887b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img888.jpg b/32063-h/images/img888.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..db3da69 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img888.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img889a.jpg b/32063-h/images/img889a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..70bd31b --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img889a.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img889b.jpg b/32063-h/images/img889b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..71b6223 --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img889b.jpg diff --git a/32063-h/images/img890.jpg b/32063-h/images/img890.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3442d5a --- /dev/null +++ b/32063-h/images/img890.jpg |
