diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 3171-0.txt | 2046 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 3171-0.zip | bin | 0 -> 43163 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 3171-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 45372 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 3171-h/3171-h.htm | 2344 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/mtdhs10.txt | 2025 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/mtdhs10.zip | bin | 0 -> 41845 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/mtdhs11.txt | 2012 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/mtdhs11.zip | bin | 0 -> 42869 bytes |
11 files changed, 8443 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/3171-0.txt b/3171-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e648aca --- /dev/null +++ b/3171-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2046 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of In Defense of Harriet Shelley by Mark +Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost +no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use +it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this +eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: In Defense of Harriet Shelley + +Author: Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +Release Date: August 20, 2006 [EBook #3171] +Last Updated: February 24, 2018 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY*** + + + +Produced by David Widger + + + + + +IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY + +by Mark Twain + + + + +I + +I have committed sins, of course; but I have not committed enough of +them to entitle me to the punishment of reduction to the bread and water +of ordinary literature during six years when I might have been living +on the fat diet spread for the righteous in Professor Dowden's Life of +Shelley, if I had been justly dealt with. + +During these six years I have been living a life of peaceful ignorance. +I was not aware that Shelley's first wife was unfaithful to him, and +that that was why he deserted her and wiped the stain from his sensitive +honor by entering into soiled relations with Godwin's young daughter. +This was all new to me when I heard it lately, and was told that the +proofs of it were in this book, and that this book's verdict is accepted +in the girls' colleges of America and its view taught in their literary +classes. + +In each of these six years multitudes of young people in our country +have arrived at the Shelley-reading age. Are these six multitudes +unacquainted with this life of Shelley? Perhaps they are; indeed, one +may feel pretty sure that the great bulk of them are. To these, then, +I address myself, in the hope that some account of this romantic +historical fable and the fabulist's manner of constructing and adorning +it may interest them. + +First, as to its literary style. Our negroes in America have several +ways of entertaining themselves which are not found among the whites +anywhere. Among these inventions of theirs is one which is particularly +popular with them. It is a competition in elegant deportment. They hire +a hall and bank the spectators' seats in rising tiers along the two +sides, leaving all the middle stretch of the floor free. A cake is +provided as a prize for the winner in the competition, and a bench of +experts in deportment is appointed to award it. Sometimes there are as +many as fifty contestants, male and female, and five hundred spectators. +One at a time the contestants enter, clothed regardless of expense in +what each considers the perfection of style and taste, and walk down the +vacant central space and back again with that multitude of critical eyes +on them. All that the competitor knows of fine airs and graces he throws +into his carriage, all that he knows of seductive expression he +throws into his countenance. He may use all the helps he can devise: +watch-chain to twirl with his fingers, cane to do graceful things with, +snowy handkerchief to flourish and get artful effects out of, shiny new +stovepipe hat to assist in his courtly bows; and the colored lady may +have a fan to work up her effects with, and smile over and blush behind, +and she may add other helps, according to her judgment. When the review +by individual detail is over, a grand review of all the contestants in +procession follows, with all the airs and graces and all the bowings and +smirkings on exhibition at once, and this enables the bench of +experts to make the necessary comparisons and arrive at a verdict. The +successful competitor gets the prize which I have before mentioned, and +an abundance of applause and envy along with it. The negroes have a +name for this grave deportment-tournament; a name taken from the prize +contended for. They call it a Cake-walk. + +This Shelley biography is a literary cake-walk. The ordinary forms of +speech are absent from it. All the pages, all the paragraphs, walk by +sedately, elegantly, not to say mincingly, in their Sunday-best, shiny +and sleek, perfumed, and with boutonnieres in their button-holes; it is +rare to find even a chance sentence that has forgotten to dress. If the +book wishes to tell us that Mary Godwin, child of sixteen, had known +afflictions, the fact saunters forth in this nobby outfit: “Mary was +herself not unlearned in the lore of pain”--meaning by that that she had +not always traveled on asphalt; or, as some authorities would frame it, +that she had “been there herself,” a form which, while preferable to the +book's form, is still not to be recommended. If the book wishes to tell +us that Harriet Shelley hired a wet-nurse, that commonplace fact gets +turned into a dancing-master, who does his professional bow before us in +pumps and knee-breeches, with his fiddle under one arm and his crush-hat +under the other, thus: “The beauty of Harriet's motherly relation to her +babe was marred in Shelley's eyes by the introduction into his house of +a hireling nurse to whom was delegated the mother's tenderest office.” + +This is perhaps the strangest book that has seen the light since +Frankenstein. Indeed, it is a Frankenstein itself; a Frankenstein with +the original infirmity supplemented by a new one; a Frankenstein with +the reasoning faculty wanting. Yet it believes it can reason, and is +always trying. It is not content to leave a mountain of fact standing in +the clear sunshine, where the simplest reader can perceive its form, its +details, and its relation to the rest of the landscape, but thinks it +must help him examine it and understand it; so its drifting mind settles +upon it with that intent, but always with one and the same result: there +is a change of temperature and the mountain is hid in a fog. Every time +it sets up a premise and starts to reason from it, there is a surprise +in store for the reader. It is strangely nearsighted, cross-eyed, and +purblind. Sometimes when a mastodon walks across the field of its vision +it takes it for a rat; at other times it does not see it at all. + +The materials of this biographical fable are facts, rumors, and poetry. +They are connected together and harmonized by the help of suggestion, +conjecture, innuendo, perversion, and semi-suppression. + +The fable has a distinct object in view, but this object is not +acknowledged in set words. Percy Bysshe Shelley has done something which +in the case of other men is called a grave crime; it must be shown that +in his case it is not that, because he does not think as other men do +about these things. + +Ought not that to be enough, if the fabulist is serious? Having proved +that a crime is not a crime, was it worth while to go on and fasten the +responsibility of a crime which was not a crime upon somebody else? What +is the use of hunting down and holding to bitter account people who are +responsible for other people's innocent acts? + +Still, the fabulist thinks it a good idea to do that. In his view +Shelley's first wife, Harriet, free of all offense as far as we have +historical facts for guidance, must be held unforgivably responsible for +her husband's innocent act in deserting her and taking up with another +woman. + +Any one will suspect that this task has its difficulties. Any one will +divine that nice work is necessary here, cautious work, wily work, and +that there is entertainment to be had in watching the magician do it. +There is indeed entertainment in watching him. He arranges his facts, +his rumors, and his poems on his table in full view of the house, and +shows you that everything is there--no deception, everything fair and +above board. And this is apparently true, yet there is a defect, for +some of his best stock is hid in an appendix-basket behind the door, and +you do not come upon it until the exhibition is over and the enchantment +of your mind accomplished--as the magician thinks. + +There is an insistent atmosphere of candor and fairness about this book +which is engaging at first, then a little burdensome, then a trifle +fatiguing, then progressively suspicious, annoying, irritating, and +oppressive. It takes one some little time to find out that phrases which +seem intended to guide the reader aright are there to mislead him; that +phrases which seem intended to throw light are there to throw darkness; +that phrases which seem intended to interpret a fact are there to +misinterpret it; that phrases which seem intended to forestall prejudice +are there to create it; that phrases which seem antidotes are poisons in +disguise. The naked facts arrayed in the book establish Shelley's guilt +in that one episode which disfigures his otherwise superlatively +lofty and beautiful life; but the historian's careful and methodical +misinterpretation of them transfers the responsibility to the wife's +shoulders as he persuades himself. The few meager facts of Harriet +Shelley's life, as furnished by the book, acquit her of offense; but +by calling in the forbidden helps of rumor, gossip, conjecture, +insinuation, and innuendo he destroys her character and rehabilitates +Shelley's--as he believes. And in truth his unheroic work has not been +barren of the results he aimed at; as witness the assertion made to me +that girls in the colleges of America are taught that Harriet Shelley +put a stain upon her husband's honor, and that that was what stung him +into repurifying himself by deserting her and his child and entering +into scandalous relations with a school-girl acquaintance of his. + +If that assertion is true, they probably use a reduction of this work +in those colleges, maybe only a sketch outlined from it. Such a thing as +that could be harmful and misleading. They ought to cast it out and put +the whole book in its place. It would not deceive. It would not deceive +the janitor. + +All of this book is interesting on account of the sorcerer's methods and +the attractiveness of some of his characters and the repulsiveness of +the rest, but no part of it is so much so as are the chapters wherein he +tries to think he thinks he sets forth the causes which led to Shelley's +desertion of his wife in 1814. + +Harriet Westbrook was a school-girl sixteen years old. Shelley was +teeming with advanced thought. He believed that Christianity was a +degrading and selfish superstition, and he had a deep and sincere desire +to rescue one of his sisters from it. Harriet was impressed by +his various philosophies and looked upon him as an intellectual +wonder--which indeed he was. He had an idea that she could give him +valuable help in his scheme regarding his sister; therefore he asked her +to correspond with him. She was quite willing. Shelley was not thinking +of love, for he was just getting over a passion for his cousin, Harriet +Grove, and just getting well steeped in one for Miss Hitchener, a +school-teacher. What might happen to Harriet Westbrook before the +letter-writing was ended did not enter his mind. Yet an older person +could have made a good guess at it, for in person Shelley was as +beautiful as an angel, he was frank, sweet, winning, unassuming, and so +rich in unselfishness, generosities, and magnanimities that he made +his whole generation seem poor in these great qualities by comparison. +Besides, he was in distress. His college had expelled him for writing an +atheistical pamphlet and afflicting the reverend heads of the university +with it, his rich father and grandfather had closed their purses against +him, his friends were cold. Necessarily, Harriet fell in love with him; +and so deeply, indeed, that there was no way for Shelley to save her +from suicide but to marry her. He believed himself to blame for this +state of things, so the marriage took place. He was pretty fairly in +love with Harriet, although he loved Miss Hitchener better. He wrote and +explained the case to Miss Hitchener after the wedding, and he could +not have been franker or more naive and less stirred up about the +circumstance if the matter in issue had been a commercial transaction +involving thirty-five dollars. + +Shelley was nineteen. He was not a youth, but a man. He had never had +any youth. He was an erratic and fantastic child during eighteen years, +then he stepped into manhood, as one steps over a door-sill. He was +curiously mature at nineteen in his ability to do independent thinking +on the deep questions of life and to arrive at sharply definite +decisions regarding them, and stick to them--stick to them and stand by +them at cost of bread, friendships, esteem, respect, and approbation. + +For the sake of his opinions he was willing to sacrifice all these +valuable things, and did sacrifice them; and went on doing it, too, when +he could at any moment have made himself rich and supplied himself with +friends and esteem by compromising with his father, at the moderate +expense of throwing overboard one or two indifferent details of his +cargo of principles. + +He and Harriet eloped to Scotland and got married. They took lodgings +in Edinburgh of a sort answerable to their purse, which was about empty, +and there their life was a happy, one and grew daily more so. They had +only themselves for company, but they needed no additions to it. They +were as cozy and contented as birds in a nest. Harriet sang evenings or +read aloud; also she studied and tried to improve her mind, her husband +instructing her in Latin. She was very beautiful, she was modest, quiet, +genuine, and, according to her husband's testimony, she had no fine lady +airs or aspirations about her. In Matthew Arnold's judgment, she was “a +pleasing figure.” + +The pair remained five weeks in Edinburgh, and then took lodgings in +York, where Shelley's college mate, Hogg, lived. Shelley presently ran +down to London, and Hogg took this opportunity to make love to the young +wife. She repulsed him, and reported the fact to her husband when he got +back. It seems a pity that Shelley did not copy this creditable conduct +of hers some time or other when under temptation, so that we might +have seen the author of his biography hang the miracle in the skies and +squirt rainbows at it. + +At the end of the first year of marriage--the most trying year for any +young couple, for then the mutual failings are coming one by one +to light, and the necessary adjustments are being made in pain and +tribulation--Shelley was able to recognize that his marriage venture had +been a safe one. As we have seen, his love for his wife had begun in a +rather shallow way and with not much force, but now it was become deep +and strong, which entitles his wife to a broad credit mark, one may +admit. He addresses a long and loving poem to her, in which both passion +and worship appear: + +Exhibit A + + “O thou + Whose dear love gleamed upon the gloomy path + Which this lone spirit travelled, + ............. + ... wilt thou not turn + Those spirit-beaming eyes and look on me. + Until I be assured that Earth is Heaven + And Heaven is Earth? + ........ + Harriet! let death all mortal ties dissolve, + But ours shall not be mortal.” + + +Shelley also wrote a sonnet to her in August of this same year in +celebration of her birthday: + +Exhibit B + + “Ever as now with Love and Virtue's glow + May thy unwithering soul not cease to burn, + Still may thine heart with those pure thoughts o'erflow + Which force from mine such quick and warm return.” + + +Was the girl of seventeen glad and proud and happy? We may conjecture +that she was. + +That was the year 1812. Another year passed still happily, still +successfully--a child was born in June, 1813, and in September, three +months later, Shelley addresses a poem to this child, Ianthe, in which +he points out just when the little creature is most particularly dear to +him: + +Exhibit C + + “Dearest when most thy tender traits express + The image of thy mother's loveliness.” + + +Up to this point the fabulist counsel for Shelley and prosecutor of his +young wife has had easy sailing, but now his trouble begins, for Shelley +is getting ready to make some unpleasant history for himself, and it +will be necessary to put the blame of it on the wife. + +Shelley had made the acquaintance of a charming gray-haired, +young-hearted Mrs. Boinville, whose face “retained a certain youthful +beauty”; she lived at Bracknell, and had a young daughter named Cornelia +Turner, who was equipped with many fascinations. Apparently these people +were sufficiently sentimental. Hogg says of Mrs. Boinville: + + “The greater part of her associates were odious. I generally + found there two or three sentimental young butchers, an + eminently philosophical tinker, and several very + unsophisticated medical practitioners or medical students, all + of low origin and vulgar and offensive manners. They sighed, + turned up their eyes, retailed philosophy, such as it was,” + etc. + +Shelley moved to Bracknell, July 27th (this is still 1813) purposely to +be near this unwholesome prairie-dogs' nest. The fabulist says: “It was +the entrance into a world more amiable and exquisite than he had yet +known.” + +“In this acquaintance the attraction was mutual”--and presently it grew +to be very mutual indeed, between Shelley and Cornelia Turner, when they +got to studying the Italian poets together. Shelley, “responding like +a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of sentiment,” had +his chance here. It took only four days for Cornelia's attractions to +begin to dim Harriet's. Shelley arrived on the 27th of July; on the 31st +he wrote a sonnet to Harriet in which “one detects already the little +rift in the lover's lute which had seemed to be healed or never to +have gaped at all when the later and happier sonnet to Ianthe was +written”--in September, we remember: + +Exhibit D + + “EVENING. TO HARRIET + + “O thou bright Sun! Beneath the dark blue line + Of western distance that sublime descendest, + And, gleaming lovelier as thy beams decline, + Thy million hues to every vapor lendest, + And over cobweb, lawn, and grove, and stream + Sheddest the liquid magic of thy light, + Till calm Earth, with the parting splendor bright, + Shows like the vision of a beauteous dream; + What gazer now with astronomic eye + Could coldly count the spots within thy sphere? + Such were thy lover, Harriet, could he fly + The thoughts of all that makes his passion dear, + And turning senseless from thy warm caress + Pick flaws in our close-woven happiness.” + + +I cannot find the “rift”; still it may be there. What the poem seems to +say is, that a person would be coldly ungrateful who could consent +to count and consider little spots and flaws in such a warm, great, +satisfying sun as Harriet is. It is a “little rift which had seemed +to be healed, or never to have gaped at all.” That is, “one detects” a +little rift which perhaps had never existed. How does one do that? How +does one see the invisible? It is the fabulist's secret; he knows how to +detect what does not exist, he knows how to see what is not seeable; it +is his gift, and he works it many a time to poor dead Harriet Shelley's +deep damage. + +“As yet, however, if there was a speck upon Shelley's happiness it was +no more than a speck”--meaning the one which one detects where “it may +never have gaped at all”--“nor had Harriet cause for discontent.” + +Shelley's Latin instructions to his wife had ceased. “From a teacher he +had now become a pupil.” Mrs. Boinville and her young married daughter +Cornelia were teaching him Italian poetry; a fact which warns one to +receive with some caution that other statement that Harriet had no +“cause for discontent.” + +Shelley had stopped instructing Harriet in Latin, as before mentioned. +The biographer thinks that the busy life in London some time back, and +the intrusion of the baby, account for this. These were hindrances, but +were there no others? He is always overlooking a detail here and +there that might be valuable in helping us understand a situation. For +instance, when a man has been hard at work at the Italian poets with +a pretty woman, hour after hour, and responding like a tremulous +instrument to every breath of passion or of sentiment in the meantime, +that man is dog-tired when he gets home, and he can't teach his wife +Latin; it would be unreasonable to expect it. + +Up to this time we have submitted to having Mrs. Boinville pushed upon +us as ostensibly concerned in these Italian lessons, but the biographer +drops her now, of his own accord. Cornelia “perhaps” is sole teacher. +Hogg says she was a prey to a kind of sweet melancholy, arising from +causes purely imaginary; she required consolation, and found it in +Petrarch. He also says, “Bysshe entered at once fully into her views +and caught the soft infection, breathing the tenderest and sweetest +melancholy, as every true poet ought.” + +Then the author of the book interlards a most stately and fine +compliment to Cornelia, furnished by a man of approved judgment who knew +her well “in later years.” It is a very good compliment indeed, and she +no doubt deserved it in her “later years,” when she had for generations +ceased to be sentimental and lackadaisical, and was no longer engaged in +enchanting young husbands and sowing sorrow for young wives. But why is +that compliment to that old gentlewoman intruded there? Is it to make +the reader believe she was well-chosen and safe society for a young, +sentimental husband? The biographer's device was not well planned. That +old person was not present--it was her other self that was there, her +young, sentimental, melancholy, warm-blooded self, in those early sweet +times before antiquity had cooled her off and mossed her back. + +“In choosing for friends such women as Mrs. Newton, Mrs. Boinville, +and Cornelia Turner, Shelley gave good proof of his insight and +discrimination.” That is the fabulist's opinion--Harriet Shelley's is +not reported. + +Early in August, Shelley was in London trying to raise money. In +September he wrote the poem to the baby, already quoted from. In the +first week of October Shelley and family went to Warwick, then to +Edinburgh, arriving there about the middle of the month. + +“Harriet was happy.” Why? The author furnishes a reason, but hides from +us whether it is history or conjecture; it is because “the babe had +borne the journey well.” It has all the aspect of one of his artful +devices--flung in in his favorite casual way--the way he has when he +wants to draw one's attention away from an obvious thing and amuse it +with some trifle that is less obvious but more useful--in a history like +this. The obvious thing is, that Harriet was happy because there was +much territory between her husband and Cornelia Turner now; and because +the perilous Italian lessons were taking a rest; and because, if there +chanced to be any respondings like a tremulous instrument to every +breath of passion or of sentiment in stock in these days, she might hope +to get a share of them herself; and because, with her husband liberated, +now, from the fetid fascinations of that sentimental retreat so +pitilessly described by Hogg, who also dubbed it “Shelley's paradise” + later, she might hope to persuade him to stay away from it permanently; +and because she might also hope that his brain would cool, now, and his +heart become healthy, and both brain and heart consider the situation +and resolve that it would be a right and manly thing to stand by this +girl-wife and her child and see that they were honorably dealt with, +and cherished and protected and loved by the man that had promised these +things, and so be made happy and kept so. And because, also--may we +conjecture this?--we may hope for the privilege of taking up our cozy +Latin lessons again, that used to be so pleasant, and brought us so near +together--so near, indeed, that often our heads touched, just as heads +do over Italian lessons; and our hands met in casual and unintentional, +but still most delicious and thrilling little contacts and momentary +clasps, just as they inevitably do over Italian lessons. Suppose one +should say to any young wife: “I find that your husband is poring over +the Italian poets and being instructed in the beautiful Italian language +by the lovely Cornelia Robinson”--would that cozy picture fail to rise +before her mind? would its possibilities fail to suggest themselves to +her? would there be a pang in her heart and a blush on her face? or, on +the contrary, would the remark give her pleasure, make her joyous and +gay? Why, one needs only to make the experiment--the result will not be +uncertain. + +However, we learn--by authority of deeply reasoned and searching +conjecture--that the baby bore the journey well, and that that was +why the young wife was happy. That accounts for two per cent. of the +happiness, but it was not right to imply that it accounted for the other +ninety-eight also. + +Peacock, a scholar, poet, and friend of the Shelleys, was of their party +when they went away. He used to laugh at the Boinville menagerie, and +“was not a favorite.” One of the Boinville group, writing to Hogg, said, +“The Shelleys have made an addition to their party in the person of a +cold scholar, who, I think, has neither taste nor feeling. This, Shelley +will perceive sooner or later, for his warm nature craves sympathy.” + True, and Shelley will fight his way back there to get it--there will be +no way to head him off. + +Toward the end of November it was necessary for Shelley to pay a +business visit to London, and he conceived the project of leaving +Harriet and the baby in Edinburgh with Harriet's sister, Eliza +Westbrook, a sensible, practical maiden lady about thirty years old, who +had spent a great part of her time with the family since the marriage. +She was an estimable woman, and Shelley had had reason to like her, and +did like her; but along about this time his feeling towards her changed. +Part of Shelley's plan, as he wrote Hogg, was to spend his London +evenings with the Newtons--members of the Boinville Hysterical Society. +But, alas, when he arrived early in December, that pleasant game was +partially blocked, for Eliza and the family arrived with him. We are +left destitute of conjectures at this point by the biographer, and it +is my duty to supply one. I chance the conjecture that it was Eliza +who interfered with that game. I think she tried to do what she could +towards modifying the Boinville connection, in the interest of her young +sister's peace and honor. + +If it was she who blocked that game, she was not strong enough to block +the next one. Before the month and year were out--no date given, let us +call it Christmas--Shelley and family were nested in a furnished house +in Windsor, “at no great distance from the Boinvilles”--these decoys +still residing at Bracknell. + +What we need, now, is a misleading conjecture. We get it with +characteristic promptness and depravity: + + “But Prince Athanase found not the aged Zonoras, the friend of + his boyhood, in any wanderings to Windsor. Dr. Lind had died + a year since, and with his death Windsor must have lost, for + Shelley, its chief attraction.” + +Still, not to mention Shelley's wife, there was Bracknell, at any rate. +While Bracknell remains, all solace is not lost. Shelley is represented +by this biographer as doing a great many careless things, but to my mind +this hiring a furnished house for three months in order to be with a man +who has been dead a year, is the carelessest of them all. One feels for +him--that is but natural, and does us honor besides--yet one is vexed, +for all that. He could have written and asked about the aged Zonoras +before taking the house. He may not have had the address, but that is +nothing--any postman would know the aged Zonoras; a dead postman would +remember a name like that. + +And yet, why throw a rag like this to us ravening wolves? Is it +seriously supposable that we will stop to chew it and let our prey +escape? No, we are getting to expect this kind of device, and to give it +merely a sniff for certainty's sake and then walk around it and leave +it lying. Shelley was not after the aged Zonoras; he was pointed for +Cornelia and the Italian lessons, for his warm nature was craving +sympathy. + + + + +II + +The year 1813 is just ended now, and we step into 1814. + +To recapitulate, how much of Cornelia's society has Shelley had, thus +far? Portions of August and September, and four days of July. That is to +say, he has had opportunity to enjoy it, more or less, during that brief +period. Did he want some more of it? We must fall back upon history, and +then go to conjecturing. + + “In the early part of the year 1814, Shelley was a frequent + visitor at Bracknell.” + +“Frequent” is a cautious word, in this author's mouth; the very +cautiousness of it, the vagueness of it, provokes suspicion; it makes +one suspect that this frequency was more frequent than the mere common +everyday kinds of frequency which one is in the habit of averaging up +with the unassuming term “frequent.” I think so because they fixed up +a bedroom for him in the Boinville house. One doesn't need a bedroom +if one is only going to run over now and then in a disconnected way to +respond like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of +sentiment and rub up one's Italian poetry a little. + +The young wife was not invited, perhaps. If she was, she most certainly +did not come, or she would have straightened the room up; the most +ignorant of us knows that a wife would not endure a room in the +condition in which Hogg found this one when he occupied it one night. +Shelley was away--why, nobody can divine. Clothes were scattered about, +there were books on every side: “Wherever a book could be laid was an +open book turned down on its face to keep its place.” It seems plain +that the wife was not invited. No, not that; I think she was invited, +but said to herself that she could not bear to go there and see another +young woman touching heads with her husband over an Italian book and +making thrilling hand-contacts with him accidentally. + +As remarked, he was a frequent visitor there, “where he found an +easeful resting-place in the house of Mrs. Boinville--the white-haired +Maimuna--and of her daughter, Mrs. Turner.” The aged Zonoras was +deceased, but the white-haired Maimuna was still on deck, as we see. +“Three charming ladies entertained the mocker (Hogg) with cups of tea, +late hours, Wieland's Agathon, sighs and smiles, and the celestial manna +of refined sentiment.” + +“Such,” says Hogg, “were the delights of Shelley's paradise in +Bracknell.” + +The white-haired Maimuna presently writes to Hogg: + + “I will not have you despise home-spun pleasures. Shelley is + making a trial of them with us--” + +A trial of them. It may be called that. It was March 11, and he had been +in the house a month. She continues: + + Shelley “likes them so well that he is resolved to leave off + rambling--” + +But he has already left it off. He has been there a month. + + “And begin a course of them himself.” + +But he has already begun it. He has been at it a month. He likes it +so well that he has forgotten all about his wife, as a letter of his +reveals. + + “Seriously, I think his mind and body want rest.” + +Yet he has been resting both for a month, with Italian, and tea, and +manna of sentiment, and late hours, and every restful thing a young +husband could need for the refreshment of weary limbs and a sore +conscience, and a nagging sense of shabbiness and treachery. + + “His journeys after what he has never found have racked his + purse and his tranquillity. He is resolved to take a little + care of the former, in pity to the latter, which I applaud, and + shall second with all my might.” + +But she does not say whether the young wife, a stranger and lonely +yonder, wants another woman and her daughter Cornelia to be lavishing so +much inflamed interest on her husband or not. That young wife is always +silent--we are never allowed to hear from her. She must have opinions +about such things, she cannot be indifferent, she must be approving or +disapproving, surely she would speak if she were allowed--even to-day +and from her grave she would, if she could, I think--but we get only the +other side, they keep her silent always. + + “He has deeply interested us. In the course of your intimacy + he must have made you feel what we now feel for him. He is + seeking a house close to us--” + +Ah! he is not close enough yet, it seems-- + + “and if he succeeds we shall have an additional motive to + induce you to come among us in the summer.” + +The reader would puzzle a long time and not guess the biographer's +comment upon the above letter. It is this: + + “These sound like words of A considerate and judicious friend.” + +That is what he thinks. That is, it is what he thinks he thinks. No, +that is not quite it: it is what he thinks he can stupefy a particularly +and unspeakably dull reader into thinking it is what he thinks. He +makes that comment with the knowledge that Shelley is in love with this +woman's daughter, and that it is because of the fascinations of these +two that Shelley has deserted his wife--for this month, considering all +the circumstances, and his new passion, and his employment of the time, +amounted to desertion; that is its rightful name. We cannot know how +the wife regarded it and felt about it; but if she could have read the +letter which Shelley was writing to Hogg four or five days later, we +could guess her thought and how she felt. Hear him:....... + + “I have been staying with Mrs. Boinville for the last month; + I have escaped, in the society of all that philosophy and + friendship combine, from the dismaying solitude of myself.” + +It is fair to conjecture that he was feeling ashamed. + + “They have revived in my heart the expiring flame of life. + I have felt myself translated to a paradise which has nothing + of mortality but its transitoriness; my heart sickens at the + view of that necessity which will quickly divide me from the + delightful tranquillity of this happy home--for it has become + my home. + ....... + “Eliza is still with us--not here!--but will be with me when + the infinite malice of destiny forces me to depart.” + +Eliza is she who blocked that game--the game in London--the one where +we were purposing to dine every night with one of the “three charming +ladies” who fed tea and manna and late hours to Hogg at Bracknell. + +Shelley could send Eliza away, of course; could have cleared her out +long ago if so minded, just as he had previously done with a predecessor +of hers whom he had first worshiped and then turned against; but +perhaps she was useful there as a thin excuse for staying away himself. + + “I am now but little inclined to contest this point. + I certainly hate her with all my heart and soul.... + + “It is a sight which awakens an inexpressible sensation of + disgust and horror, to see her caress my poor little Ianthe, + in whom I may hereafter find the consolation of sympathy. + I sometimes feel faint with the fatigue of checking the + overflowings of my unbounded abhorrence for this miserable + wretch. But she is no more than a blind and loathsome worm, + that cannot see to sting. + + “I have begun to learn Italian again.... Cornelia + assists me in this language. Did I not once tell you that I + thought her cold and reserved? She is the reverse of this, as + she is the reverse of everything bad. She inherits all the + divinity of her mother.... I have sometimes forgotten + that I am not an inmate of this delightful home--that a time + will come which will cast me again into the boundless ocean of + abhorred society. + + “I have written nothing but one stanza, which has no meaning, + and that I have only written in thought: + + “Thy dewy looks sink in my breast; + Thy gentle words stir poison there; + Thou hast disturbed the only rest + That was the portion of despair. + Subdued to duty's hard control, + I could have borne my wayward lot: + The chains that bind this rained soul + Had cankered then, but crushed it not. + + “This is the vision of a delirious and distempered dream, which + passes away at the cold clear light of morning. Its surpassing + excellence and exquisite perfections have no more reality than + the color of an autumnal sunset.” + +Then it did not refer to his wife. That is plain; otherwise he would +have said so. It is well that he explained that it has no meaning, for +if he had not done that, the previous soft references to Cornelia and +the way he has come to feel about her now would make us think she was +the person who had inspired it while teaching him how to read the warm +and ruddy Italian poets during a month. + +The biography observes that portions of this letter “read like the tired +moaning of a wounded creature.” Guesses at the nature of the wound are +permissible; we will hazard one. + +Read by the light of Shelley's previous history, his letter seems to be +the cry of a tortured conscience. Until this time it was a conscience +that had never felt a pang or known a smirch. It was the conscience of +one who, until this time, had never done a dishonorable thing, or an +ungenerous, or cruel, or treacherous thing, but was now doing all of +these, and was keenly aware of it. Up to this time Shelley had been +master of his nature, and it was a nature which was as beautiful and as +nearly perfect as any merely human nature may be. But he was drunk now, +with a debasing passion, and was not himself. There is nothing in his +previous history that is in character with the Shelley of this letter. +He had done boyish things, foolish things, even crazy things, but never +a thing to be ashamed of. He had done things which one might laugh at, +but the privilege of laughing was limited always to the thing itself; +you could not laugh at the motive back of it--that was high, that was +noble. His most fantastic and quixotic acts had a purpose back of +them which made them fine, often great, and made the rising laugh seem +profanation and quenched it; quenched it, and changed the impulse to +homage. + +Up to this time he had been loyalty itself, where his obligations +lay--treachery was new to him; he had never done an ignoble +thing--baseness was new to him; he had never done an unkind thing--that +also was new to him. + +This was the author of that letter, this was the man who had deserted +his young wife and was lamenting, because he must leave another woman's +house which had become a “home” to him, and go away. Is he lamenting +mainly because he must go back to his wife and child? No, the lament is +mainly for what he is to leave behind him. The physical comforts of the +house? No, in his life he had never attached importance to such +things. Then the thing which he grieves to leave is narrowed down to a +person--to the person whose “dewy looks” had sunk into his breast, and +whose seducing words had “stirred poison there.” + +He was ashamed of himself, his conscience was upbraiding him. He was +the slave of a degrading love; he was drunk with his passion, the real +Shelley was in temporary eclipse. This is the verdict which his previous +history must certainly deliver upon this episode, I think. + +One must be allowed to assist himself with conjectures like these +when trying to find his way through a literary swamp which has so many +misleading finger-boards up as this book is furnished with. + +We have now arrived at a part of the swamp where the difficulties +and perplexities are going to be greater than any we have yet met +with--where, indeed, the finger-boards are multitudinous, and the most +of them pointing diligently in the wrong direction. We are to be told by +the biography why Shelley deserted his wife and child and took up with +Cornelia Turner and Italian. It was not on account of Cornelia's sighs +and sentimentalities and tea and manna and late hours and soft and sweet +and industrious enticements; no, it was because “his happiness in his +home had been wounded and bruised almost to death.” + +It had been wounded and bruised almost to death in this way: + +1st. Harriet persuaded him to set up a carriage. + +2d. After the intrusion of the baby, Harriet stopped reading aloud and +studying. + +3d. Harriet's walks with Hogg “commonly conducted us to some fashionable +bonnet-shop.” + +4th. Harriet hired a wet-nurse. + +5th. When an operation was being performed upon the baby, “Harriet stood +by, narrowly observing all that was done, but, to the astonishment of +the operator, betraying not the smallest sign of emotion.” + +6th. Eliza Westbrook, sister-in-law, was still of the household. + +The evidence against Harriet Shelley is all in; there is no more. Upon +these six counts she stands indicted of the crime of driving her +husband into that sty at Bracknell; and this crime, by these helps, the +biographical prosecuting attorney has set himself the task of proving +upon her. + +Does the biographer call himself the attorney for the prosecution? +No, only to himself, privately; publicly he is the passionless, +disinterested, impartial judge on the bench. He holds up his judicial +scales before the world, that all may see; and it all tries to look so +fair that a blind person would sometimes fail to see him slip the false +weights in. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, first, because Harriet had persuaded him to set up a carriage. I +cannot discover that any evidence is offered that she asked him to set +up a carriage. Still, if she did, was it a heavy offense? Was it unique? +Other young wives had committed it before, others have committed it +since. Shelley had dearly loved her in those London days; possibly he +set up the carriage gladly to please her; affectionate young husbands +do such things. When Shelley ran away with another girl, by-and-by, this +girl persuaded him to pour the price of many carriages and many horses +down the bottomless well of her father's debts, but this impartial +judge finds no fault with that. Once she appeals to Shelley to raise +money--necessarily by borrowing, there was no other way--to pay her +father's debts with at a time when Shelley was in danger of being +arrested and imprisoned for his own debts; yet the good judge finds no +fault with her even for this. + +First and last, Shelley emptied into that rapacious mendicant's lap a +sum which cost him--for he borrowed it at ruinous rates--from eighty +to one hundred thousand dollars. But it was Mary Godwin's papa, the +supplications were often sent through Mary, the good judge is Mary's +strenuous friend, so Mary gets no censures. On the Continent Mary rode +in her private carriage, built, as Shelley boasts, “by one of the best +makers in Bond Street,” yet the good judge makes not even a passing +comment on this iniquity. Let us throw out Count No. 1 against Harriet +Shelley as being far-fetched, and frivolous. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost +to death, secondly, because Harriet's studies “had dwindled away to +nothing, Bysshe had ceased to express any interest in them.” At what +time was this? It was when Harriet “had fully recovered from the fatigue +of her first effort of maternity... and was now in full force, vigor, +and effect.” Very well, the baby was born two days before the close of +June. It took the mother a month to get back her full force, vigor, and +effect; this brings us to July 27th and the deadly Cornelia. If a +wife of eighteen is studying with her husband and he gets smitten with +another woman, isn't he likely to lose interest in his wife's studies +for that reason, and is not his wife's interest in her studies likely to +languish for the same reason? Would not the mere sight of those books of +hers sharpen the pain that is in her heart? This sudden breaking down of +a mutual intellectual interest of two years' standing is coincident with +Shelley's re-encounter with Cornelia; and we are allowed to gather from +that time forth for nearly two months he did all his studying in that +person's society. We feel at liberty to rule out Count No. 2 from the +indictment against Harriet. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, thirdly, because Harriet's walks with Hogg commonly led to some +fashionable bonnet-shop. I offer no palliation; I only ask why the +dispassionate, impartial judge did not offer one himself--merely, I +mean, to offset his leniency in a similar case or two where the girl +who ran away with Harriet's husband was the shopper. There are several +occasions where she interested herself with shopping--among them being +walks which ended at the bonnet-shop--yet in none of these cases does +she get a word of blame from the good judge, while in one of them he +covers the deed with a justifying remark, she doing the shopping that +time to find easement for her mind, her child having died. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fourthly, by the introduction there of a wet-nurse. The wet-nurse +was introduced at the time of the Edinburgh sojourn, immediately after +Shelley had been enjoying the two months of study with Cornelia which +broke up his wife's studies and destroyed his personal interest in them. +Why, by this time, nothing that Shelley's wife could do would have been +satisfactory to him, for he was in love with another woman, and was +never going to be contented again until he got back to her. If he had +been still in love with his wife it is not easily conceivable that he +would care much who nursed the baby, provided the baby was well +nursed. Harriet's jealousy was assuredly voicing itself now, Shelley's +conscience was assuredly nagging him, pestering him, persecuting him. +Shelley needed excuses for his altered attitude toward his wife; +Providence pitied him and sent the wet-nurse. If Providence had sent him +a cotton doughnut it would have answered just as well; all he wanted was +something to find fault with. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fifthly, because Harriet narrowly watched a surgical operation +which was being performed upon her child, and, “to the astonishment +of the operator,” who was watching Harriet instead of attending to his +operation, she betrayed “not the smallest sign of emotion.” The author +of this biography was not ashamed to set down that exultant slander. He +was apparently not aware that it was a small business to bring into his +court a witness whose name he does not know, and whose character and +veracity there is none to vouch for, and allow him to strike this blow +at the mother-heart of this friendless girl. The biographer says, “We +may not infer from this that Harriet did not feel”--why put it in, +then?--“but we learn that those about her could believe her to be hard +and insensible.” Who were those who were about her? Her husband? He +hated her now, because he was in love elsewhere. Her sister? Of course +that is not charged. Peacock? Peacock does not testify. The wet-nurse? +She does not testify. If any others were there we have no mention of +them. “Those about her” are reduced to one person--her husband. Who +reports the circumstance? It is Hogg. Perhaps he was there--we do not +know. But if he was, he still got his information at second-hand, as +it was the operator who noticed Harriet's lack of emotion, not himself. +Hogg is not given to saying kind things when Harriet is his subject. +He may have said them the time that he tried to tempt her to soil her +honor, but after that he mentions her usually with a sneer. “Among +those who were about her” was one witness well equipped to silence all +tongues, abolish all doubts, set our minds at rest; one witness, not +called, and not callable, whose evidence, if we could but get it, would +outweigh the oaths of whole battalions of hostile Hoggs and nameless +surgeons--the baby. I wish we had the baby's testimony; and yet if +we had it it would not do us any good--a furtive conjecture, a sly +insinuation, a pious “if” or two, would be smuggled in, here and there, +with a solemn air of judicial investigation, and its positiveness would +wilt into dubiety. + +The biographer says of Harriet, “If words of tender affection and +motherly pride proved the reality of love, then undoubtedly she loved +her firstborn child.” That is, if mere empty words can prove it, it +stands proved--and in this way, without committing himself, he gives the +reader a chance to infer that there isn't any extant evidence but words, +and that he doesn't take much stock in them. How seldom he shows his +hand! He is always lurking behind a non-committal “if” or something of +that kind; always gliding and dodging around, distributing colorless +poison here and there and everywhere, but always leaving himself in a +position to say that his language will be found innocuous if taken to +pieces and examined. He clearly exhibits a steady and never-relaxing +purpose to make Harriet the scapegoat for her husband's first great +sin--but it is in the general view that this is revealed, not in the +details. His insidious literature is like blue water; you know what it +is that makes it blue, but you cannot produce and verify any detail of +the cloud of microscopic dust in it that does it. Your adversary can dip +up a glassful and show you that it is pure white and you cannot deny +it; and he can dip the lake dry, glass by glass, and show that every +glassful is white, and prove it to any one's eye--and yet that lake was +blue and you can swear it. This book is blue--with slander in solution. + +Let the reader examine, for example, the paragraph of comment which +immediately follows the letter containing Shelley's self-exposure which +we have been considering. This is it. One should inspect the individual +sentences as they go by, then pass them in procession and review the +cake-walk as a whole: + + “Shelley's happiness in his home, as is evident from this + pathetic letter, had been fatally stricken; it is evident, + also, that he knew where duty lay; he felt that his part was to + take up his burden, silently and sorrowfully, and to bear it + henceforth with the quietness of despair. But we can perceive + that he scarcely possessed the strength and fortitude needful + for success in such an attempt. And clearly Shelley himself + was aware how perilous it was to accept that respite of + blissful ease which he enjoyed in the Boinville household; for + gentle voices and dewy looks and words of sympathy could not + fail to remind him of an ideal of tranquillity or of joy which + could never be his, and which he must henceforth sternly + exclude from his imagination.” + +That paragraph commits the author in no way. Taken sentence by sentence +it asserts nothing against anybody or in favor of anybody, pleads for +nobody, accuses nobody. Taken detail by detail, it is as innocent as +moonshine. And yet, taken as a whole, it is a design against the reader; +its intent is to remove the feeling which the letter must leave with him +if let alone, and put a different one in its place--to remove a feeling +justified by the letter and substitute one not justified by it. The +letter itself gives you no uncertain picture--no lecturer is needed to +stand by with a stick and point out its details and let on to explain +what they mean. The picture is the very clear and remorsefully faithful +picture of a fallen and fettered angel who is ashamed of himself; an +angel who beats his soiled wings and cries, who complains to the woman +who enticed him that he could have borne his wayward lot, he could have +stood by his duty if it had not been for her beguilements; an angel who +rails at the “boundless ocean of abhorred society,” and rages at +his poor judicious sister-in-law. If there is any dignity about this +spectacle it will escape most people. + +Yet when the paragraph of comment is taken as a whole, the picture is +full of dignity and pathos; we have before us a blameless and noble +spirit stricken to the earth by malign powers, but not conquered; +tempted, but grandly putting the temptation away; enmeshed by subtle +coils, but sternly resolved to rend them and march forth victorious, at +any peril of life or limb. Curtain--slow music. + +Was it the purpose of the paragraph to take the bad taste of Shelley's +letter out of the reader's mouth? If that was not it, good ink was +wasted; without that, it has no relevancy--the multiplication table +would have padded the space as rationally. + +We have inspected the six reasons which we are asked to believe drove a +man of conspicuous patience, honor, justice, fairness, kindliness, and +iron firmness, resolution, and steadfastness, from the wife whom +he loved and who loved him, to a refuge in the mephitic paradise of +Bracknell. These are six infinitely little reasons; but there were six +colossal ones, and these the counsel for the destruction of Harriet +Shelley persists in not considering very important. + +Moreover, the colossal six preceded the little six and had done the +mischief before they were born. Let us double-column the twelve; then we +shall see at a glance that each little reason is in turn answered by a +retorting reason of a size to overshadow it and make it insignificant: + + 1. Harriet sets up carriage. 1. CORNELIA TURNER. + 2. Harriet stops studying. 2. CORNELIA TURNER. + 3. Harriet goes to bonnet-shop. 3. CORNELIA TURNER. + 4. Harriet takes a wet-nurse. 4. CORNELIA TURNER. + 5. Harriet has too much nerve. 5. CORNELIA TURNER. + 6. Detested sister-in-law 6. CORNELIA TURNER. + +As soon as we comprehend that Cornelia Turner and the Italian lessons +happened before the little six had been discovered to be grievances, +we understand why Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and +bruised almost to death, and no one can persuade us into laying it on +Harriet. Shelley and Cornelia are the responsible persons, and we cannot +in honor and decency allow the cruelties which they practised upon the +unoffending wife to be pushed aside in order to give us a chance to +waste time and tears over six sentimental justifications of an offense +which the six can't justify, nor even respectably assist in justifying. + +Six? There were seven; but in charity to the biographer the seventh +ought not to be exposed. Still, he hung it out himself, and not only +hung it out, but thought it was a good point in Shelley's favor. For two +years Shelley found sympathy and intellectual food and all that at home; +there was enough for spiritual and mental support, but not enough for +luxury; and so, at the end of the contented two years, this latter +detail justifies him in going bag and baggage over to Cornelia Turner +and supplying the rest of his need in the way of surplus sympathy and +intellectual pie unlawfully. By the same reasoning a man in merely +comfortable circumstances may rob a bank without sin. + + + + +III + +It is 1814, it is the 16th of March, Shelley has written his letter, he +has been in the Boinville paradise a month, his deserted wife is in her +husbandless home. Mischief had been wrought. It is the biographer who +concedes this. We greatly need some light on Harriet's side of the case +now; we need to know how she enjoyed the month, but there is no way to +inform ourselves; there seems to be a strange absence of documents and +letters and diaries on that side. Shelley kept a diary, the approaching +Mary Godwin kept a diary, her father kept one, her half-sister by +marriage, adoption, and the dispensation of God kept one, and the entire +tribe and all its friends wrote and received letters, and the letters +were kept and are producible when this biography needs them; but there +are only three or four scraps of Harriet's writing, and no diary. +Harriet wrote plenty of letters to her husband--nobody knows where they +are, I suppose; she wrote plenty of letters to other people--apparently +they have disappeared, too. Peacock says she wrote good letters, but +apparently interested people had sagacity enough to mislay them in time. +After all her industry she went down into her grave and lies silent +there--silent, when she has so much need to speak. We can only wonder at +this mystery, not account for it. + +No, there is no way of finding out what Harriet's state of feeling was +during the month that Shelley was disporting himself in the Bracknell +paradise. We have to fall back upon conjecture, as our fabulist does +when he has nothing more substantial to work with. Then we easily +conjecture that as the days dragged by Harriet's heart grew heavier and +heavier under its two burdens--shame and resentment: the shame of being +pointed at and gossiped about as a deserted wife, and resentment against +the woman who had beguiled her husband from her and now kept him in a +disreputable captivity. Deserted wives--deserted whether for cause or +without cause--find small charity among the virtuous and the discreet. +We conjecture that one after another the neighbors ceased to call; that +one after another they got to being “engaged” when Harriet called; that +finally they one after the other cut her dead on the street; that after +that she stayed in the house daytimes, and brooded over her sorrows, and +nighttimes did the same, there being nothing else to do with the heavy +hours and the silence and solitude and the dreary intervals which sleep +should have charitably bridged, but didn't. + +Yes, mischief had been wrought. The biographer arrives at this +conclusion, and it is a most just one. Then, just as you begin to half +hope he is going to discover the cause of it and launch hot bolts +of wrath at the guilty manufacturers of it, you have to turn away +disappointed. You are disappointed, and you sigh. This is what he says +--the italics [''] are mine: + + “However the mischief may have been wrought--'and at this day + no one can wish to heap blame on any buried head'--” + +So it is poor Harriet, after all. Stern justice must take its +course--justice tempered with delicacy, justice tempered with +compassion, justice that pities a forlorn dead girl and refuses to +strike her. Except in the back. Will not be ignoble and say the harsh +thing, but only insinuate it. Stern justice knows about the carriage and +the wet-nurse and the bonnet-shop and the other dark things that caused +this sad mischief, and may not, must not blink them; so it delivers +judgment where judgment belongs, but softens the blow by not seeming to +deliver judgment at all. To resume--the italics are mine: + + “However the mischief may have been wrought--and at this day no + one can wish to heap blame on any buried head--'it is certain + that some cause or causes of deep division between Shelley and + his wife were in operation during the early part of the year + 1814'.” + +This shows penetration. No deduction could be more accurate than this. +There were indeed some causes of deep division. But next comes another +disappointing sentence: + + “To guess at the precise nature of these causes, in the absence + of definite statement, were useless.” + +Why, he has already been guessing at them for several pages, and we have +been trying to outguess him, and now all of a sudden he is tired of it +and won't play any more. It is not quite fair to us. However, he will +get over this by-and-by, when Shelley commits his next indiscretion and +has to be guessed out of it at Harriet's expense. + +“We may rest content with Shelley's own words”--in a Chancery paper +drawn up by him three years later. They were these: “Delicacy forbids me +to say more than that we were disunited by incurable dissensions.” + +As for me, I do not quite see why we should rest content with +anything of the sort. It is not a very definite statement. It does not +necessarily mean anything more than that he did not wish to go into the +tedious details of those family quarrels. Delicacy could quite properly +excuse him from saying, “I was in love with Cornelia all that time; my +wife kept crying and worrying about it and upbraiding me and begging +me to cut myself free from a connection which was wronging her and +disgracing us both; and I being stung by these reproaches retorted with +fierce and bitter speeches--for it is my nature to do that when I am +stirred, especially if the target of them is a person whom I had greatly +loved and respected before, as witness my various attitudes towards Miss +Hitchener, the Gisbornes, Harriet's sister, and others--and finally I +did not improve this state of things when I deserted my wife and spent a +whole month with the woman who had infatuated me.” + +No, he could not go into those details, and we excuse him; but, +nevertheless, we do not rest content with this bland proposition to +puff away that whole long disreputable episode with a single mean, +meaningless remark of Shelley's. + +We do admit that “it is certain that some cause or causes of deep +division were in operation.” We would admit it just the same if the +grammar of the statement were as straight as a string, for we drift into +pretty indifferent grammar ourselves when we are absorbed in historical +work; but we have to decline to admit that we cannot guess those cause +or causes. + +But guessing is not really necessary. There is evidence +attainable--evidence from the batch discredited by the biographer and +set out at the back door in his appendix-basket; and yet a court of law +would think twice before throwing it out, whereas it would be a hardy +person who would venture to offer in such a place a good part of the +material which is placed before the readers of this book as “evidence,” + and so treated by this daring biographer. Among some letters (in the +appendix-basket) from Mrs. Godwin, detailing the Godwinian share in the +Shelleyan events of 1814, she tells how Harriet Shelley came to her and +her husband, agitated and weeping, to implore them to forbid Shelley the +house, and prevent his seeing Mary Godwin. + + “She related that last November he had fallen in love with Mrs. + Turner and paid her such marked attentions Mr. Turner, the + husband, had carried off his wife to Devonshire.” + +The biographer finds a technical fault in this; “the Shelleys were +in Edinburgh in November.” What of that? The woman is recalling a +conversation which is more than two months old; besides, she was +probably more intent upon the central and important fact of it than upon +its unimportant date. Harriet's quoted statement has some sense in it; +for that reason, if for no other, it ought to have been put in the body +of the book. Still, that would not have answered; even the biographer's +enemy could not be cruel enough to ask him to let this real +grievance, this compact and substantial and picturesque figure, this +rawhead-and-bloody-bones, come striding in there among those pale shams, +those rickety specters labeled WET-NURSE, BONNET-SHOP, and so on--no, +the father of all malice could not ask the biographer to expose his +pathetic goblins to a competition like that. + +The fabulist finds fault with the statement because it has a technical +error in it; and he does this at the moment that he is furnishing us an +error himself, and of a graver sort. He says: + + “If Turner carried off his wife to Devonshire he brought her + back and Shelley was staying with her and her mother on terms + of cordial intimacy in March, 1814.” + +We accept the “cordial intimacy”--it was the very thing Harriet was +complaining of--but there is nothing to show that it was Turner who +brought his wife back. The statement is thrown in as if it were not only +true, but was proof that Turner was not uneasy. Turner's movements are +proof of nothing. Nothing but a statement from Turner's mouth would have +any value here, and he made none. + +Six days after writing his letter Shelley and his wife were together +again for a moment--to get remarried according to the rites of the +English Church. + +Within three weeks the new husband and wife were apart again, and the +former was back in his odorous paradise. This time it is the wife who +does the deserting. She finds Cornelia too strong for her, probably. At +any rate, she goes away with her baby and sister, and we have a playful +fling at her from good Mrs. Boinville, the “mysterious spinner Maimuna”; +she whose “face was as a damsel's face, and yet her hair was gray”; she +of whom the biographer has said, “Shelley was indeed caught in an almost +invisible thread spun around him, but unconsciously, by this subtle and +benignant enchantress.” The subtle and benignant enchantress writes to +Hogg, April 18: “Shelley is again a widower; his beauteous half went to +town on Thursday.” + +Then Shelley writes a poem--a chant of grief over the hard fate which +obliges him now to leave his paradise and take up with his wife again. +It seems to intimate that the paradise is cooling toward him; that he +is warned off by acclamation; that he must not even venture to tempt +with one last tear his friend Cornelia's ungentle mood, for her eye is +glazed and cold and dares not entreat her lover to stay: + +Exhibit E + + “Pause not! the time is past! Every voice cries 'Away!' + Tempt not with one last tear thy friend's ungentle mood; + Thy lover's eye, so glazed and cold, dares not entreat thy + stay: + Duty and dereliction guide thee back to solitude.” + +Back to the solitude of his now empty home, that is! + + “Away! away! to thy sad and silent home; + Pour bitter tears on its desolated hearth.” + ........ + +But he will have rest in the grave by-and-by. Until that time comes, +the charms of Bracknell will remain in his memory, along with Mrs. +Boinville's voice and Cornelia Turner's smile: + + “Thou in the grave shalt rest--yet, till the phantoms flee + Which that house and hearth and garden made dear to thee ere while, + Thy remembrance and repentance and deep musings are not free + From the music of two voices and the light of one sweet smile.” + +We cannot wonder that Harriet could not stand it. Any of us would have +left. We would not even stay with a cat that was in this condition. Even +the Boinvilles could not endure it; and so, as we have seen, they gave +this one notice. + + “Early in May, Shelley was in London. He did not yet despair + of reconciliation with Harriet, nor had he ceased to love her.” + +Shelley's poems are a good deal of trouble to his biographer. They are +constantly inserted as “evidence,” and they make much confusion. As +soon as one of them has proved one thing, another one follows and proves +quite a different thing. The poem just quoted shows that he was in love +with Cornelia, but a month later he is in love with Harriet again, and +there is a poem to prove it. + + “In this piteous appeal Shelley declares that he has now no + grief but one--the grief of having known and lost his wife's + love.” + +Exhibit F + + “Thy look of love has power to calm + The stormiest passion of my soul.” + + +But without doubt she had been reserving her looks of love a good part +of the time for ten months, now--ever since he began to lavish his own +on Cornelia Turner at the end of the previous July. He does really seem +to have already forgotten Cornelia's merits in one brief month, for he +eulogizes Harriet in a way which rules all competition out: + + “Thou only virtuous, gentle, kind, + Amid a world of hate.” + +He complains of her hardness, and begs her to make the concession of +a “slight endurance”--of his waywardness, perhaps--for the sake of “a +fellow-being's lasting weal.” But the main force of his appeal is in his +closing stanza, and is strongly worded: + + “O trust for once no erring guide! + Bid the remorseless feeling flee; + 'Tis malice, 'tis revenge, 'tis pride, + 'Tis anything but thee; + O deign a nobler pride to prove, + And pity if thou canst not love.” + +This is in May--apparently towards the end of it. Harriet and Shelley +were corresponding all the time. Harriet got the poem--a copy exists in +her own handwriting; she being the only gentle and kind person amid a +world of hate, according to Shelley's own testimony in the poem, we are +permitted to think that the daily letters would presently have melted +that kind and gentle heart and brought about the reconciliation, if +there had been time but there wasn't; for in a very few days--in fact, +before the 8th of June--Shelley was in love with another woman. + +And so--perhaps while Harriet was walking the floor nights, trying to +get her poem by heart--her husband was doing a fresh one--for the other +girl--Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin--with sentiments like these in it: + +Exhibit G + + To spend years thus and be rewarded, + As thou, sweet love, requited me + When none were near. + ... thy lips did meet + Mine tremblingly;... + + “Gentle and good and mild thou art, + Nor can I live if thou appear + Aught but thyself.”... + + +And so on. “Before the close of June it was known and felt by Mary and +Shelley that each was inexpressibly dear to the other.” Yes, Shelley had +found this child of sixteen to his liking, and had wooed and won her in +the graveyard. But that is nothing; it was better than wooing her in her +nursery, at any rate, where it might have disturbed the other children. + +However, she was a child in years only. From the day that she set her +masculine grip on Shelley he was to frisk no more. If she had occupied +the only kind and gentle Harriet's place in March it would have been a +thrilling spectacle to see her invade the Boinville rookery and read the +riot act. That holiday of Shelley's would have been of short duration, +and Cornelia's hair would have been as gray as her mother's when the +services were over. + +Hogg went to the Godwin residence in Skinner Street with Shelley on +that 8th of June. They passed through Godwin's little debt-factory of a +book-shop and went up-stairs hunting for the proprietor. Nobody there. +Shelley strode about the room impatiently, making its crazy floor quake +under him. Then a door “was partially and softly opened. A thrilling +voice called 'Shelley!' A thrilling voice answered, 'Mary!' And he +darted out of the room like an arrow from the bow of the far-shooting +King. A very young female, fair and fair-haired, pale, indeed, and with +a piercing look, wearing a frock of tartan, an unusual dress in London +at that time, had called him out of the room.” + +This is Mary Godwin, as described by Hogg. The thrill of the voices +shows that the love of Shelley and Mary was already upward of a +fortnight old; therefore it had been born within the month of May--born +while Harriet was still trying to get her poem by heart, we think. I +must not be asked how I know so much about that thrill; it is my secret. +The biographer and I have private ways of finding out things when it is +necessary to find them out and the customary methods fail. + +Shelley left London that day, and was gone ten days. The biographer +conjectures that he spent this interval with Harriet in Bath. It would +be just like him. To the end of his days he liked to be in love with two +women at once. He was more in love with Miss Hitchener when he married +Harriet than he was with Harriet, and told the lady so with simple and +unostentatious candor. He was more in love with Cornelia than he was +with Harriet in the end of 1813 and the beginning of 1814, yet he +supplied both of them with love poems of an equal temperature meantime; +he loved Mary and Harriet in June, and while getting ready to run off +with the one, it is conjectured that he put in his odd time trying to +get reconciled to the other; by-and-by, while still in love with Mary, +he will make love to her half-sister by marriage, adoption, and the +visitation of God, through the medium of clandestine letters, and she +will answer with letters that are for no eye but his own. + +When Shelley encountered Mary Godwin he was looking around for another +paradise. He had tastes of his own, and there were features about +the Godwin establishment that strongly recommended it. Godwin was an +advanced thinker and an able writer. One of his romances is still read, +but his philosophical works, once so esteemed, are out of vogue now; +their authority was already declining when Shelley made his acquaintance +--that is, it was declining with the public, but not with Shelley. They +had been his moral and political Bible, and they were that yet. Shelley +the infidel would himself have claimed to be less a work of God than a +work of Godwin. Godwin's philosophies had formed his mind and interwoven +themselves into it and become a part of its texture; he regarded himself +as Godwin's spiritual son. Godwin was not without self-appreciation; +indeed, it may be conjectured that from his point of view the last +syllable of his name was surplusage. He lived serene in his lofty world +of philosophy, far above the mean interests that absorbed smaller men, +and only came down to the ground at intervals to pass the hat for alms +to pay his debts with, and insult the man that relieved him. Several of +his principles were out of the ordinary. For example, he was opposed to +marriage. He was not aware that his preachings from this text were but +theory and wind; he supposed he was in earnest in imploring people to +live together without marrying, until Shelley furnished him a working +model of his scheme and a practical example to analyze, by applying the +principle in his own family; the matter took a different and surprising +aspect then. The late Matthew Arnold said that the main defect in +Shelley's make-up was that he was destitute of the sense of humor. This +episode must have escaped Mr. Arnold's attention. + +But we have said enough about the head of the new paradise. Mrs. Godwin +is described as being in several ways a terror; and even when her soul +was in repose she wore green spectacles. But I suspect that her main +unattractiveness was born of the fact that she wrote the letters that +are out in the appendix-basket in the back yard--letters which are an +outrage and wholly untrustworthy, for they say some kind things about +poor Harriet and tell some disagreeable truths about her husband; and +these things make the fabulist grit his teeth a good deal. + +Next we have Fanny Godwin--a Godwin by courtesy only; she was Mrs. +Godwin's natural daughter by a former friend. She was a sweet and +winning girl, but she presently wearied of the Godwin paradise, and +poisoned herself. + +Last in the list is Jane (or Claire, as she preferred to call herself) +Clairmont, daughter of Mrs. Godwin by a former marriage. She was very +young and pretty and accommodating, and always ready to do what +she could to make things pleasant. After Shelley ran off with her +part-sister Mary, she became the guest of the pair, and contributed a +natural child to their nursery--Allegra. Lord Byron was the father. + +We have named the several members and advantages of the new paradise +in Skinner Street, with its crazy book-shop underneath. Shelley was all +right now, this was a better place than the other; more variety anyway, +and more different kinds of fragrance. One could turn out poetry here +without any trouble at all. + +The way the new love-match came about was this: + +Shelley told Mary all his aggravations and sorrows and griefs, and about +the wet-nurse and the bonnetshop and the surgeon and the carriage, and +the sister-in-law that blocked the London game, and about Cornelia and +her mamma, and how they had turned him out of the house after making +so much of him; and how he had deserted Harriet and then Harriet had +deserted him, and how the reconciliation was working along and Harriet +getting her poem by heart; and still he was not happy, and Mary pitied +him, for she had had trouble herself. But I am not satisfied with this. +It reads too much like statistics. It lacks smoothness and grace, and is +too earthy and business-like. It has the sordid look of a trades-union +procession out on strike. That is not the right form for it. The book +does it better; we will fall back on the book and have a cake-walk: + + “It was easy to divine that some restless grief possessed him; + Mary herself was not unlearned in the lore of pain. His + generous zeal in her father's behalf, his spiritual sonship to + Godwin, his reverence for her mother's memory, were guarantees + with Mary of his excellence.--[What she was after was + guarantees of his excellence. That he stood ready to desert + his wife and child was one of them, apparently.]--The new + friends could not lack subjects of discourse, and underneath + their words about Mary's mother, and 'Political Justice,' and + 'Rights of Woman,' were two young hearts, each feeling towards + the other, each perhaps unaware, trembling in the direction of + the other. The desire to assuage the suffering of one whose + happiness has grown precious to us may become a hunger of the + spirit as keen as any other, and this hunger now possessed + Mary's heart; when her eyes rested unseen on Shelley, it was + with a look full of the ardor of a 'soothing pity.'” + +Yes, that is better and has more composure. That is just the way it +happened. He told her about the wet-nurse, she told him about political +justice; he told her about the deadly sister-in-law, she told him about +her mother; he told her about the bonnet-shop, she murmured back about +the rights of woman; then he assuaged her, then she assuaged him; then +he assuaged her some more, next she assuaged him some more; then they +both assuaged one another simultaneously; and so they went on by the +hour assuaging and assuaging and assuaging, until at last what was the +result? They were in love. It will happen so every time. + + “He had married a woman who, as he now persuaded himself, had + never truly loved him, who loved only his fortune and his rank, + and who proved her selfishness by deserting him in his misery.” + +I think that that is not quite fair to Harriet. We have no certainty +that she knew Cornelia had turned him out of the house. He went back to +Cornelia, and Harriet may have supposed that he was as happy with her +as ever. Still, it was judicious to begin to lay on the whitewash, +for Shelley is going to need many a coat of it now, and the sooner the +reader becomes used to the intrusion of the brush the sooner he will get +reconciled to it and stop fretting about it. + +After Shelley's (conjectured) visit to Harriet at Bath--8th of June to +18th--“it seems to have been arranged that Shelley should henceforth +join the Skinner Street household each day at dinner.” + +Nothing could be handier than this; things will swim along now. + + “Although now Shelley was coming to believe that his wedded + union with Harriet was a thing of the past, he had not ceased + to regard her with affectionate consideration; he wrote to her + frequently, and kept her informed of his whereabouts.” + +We must not get impatient over these curious inharmoniousnesses +and irreconcilabilities in Shelley's character. You can see by the +biographer's attitude towards them that there is nothing objectionable +about them. Shelley was doing his best to make two adoring young +creatures happy: he was regarding the one with affectionate +consideration by mail, and he was assuaging the other one at home. + + “Unhappy Harriet, residing at Bath, had perhaps never desired + that the breach between herself and her husband should be + irreparable and complete.” + +I find no fault with that sentence except that the “perhaps” is not +strictly warranted. It should have been left out. In support--or +shall we say extenuation?--of this opinion I submit that there is not +sufficient evidence to warrant the uncertainty which it implies. The +only “evidence” offered that Harriet was hard and proud and standing out +against a reconciliation is a poem--the poem in which Shelley beseeches +her to “bid the remorseless feeling flee” and “pity” if she “cannot +love.” We have just that as “evidence,” and out of its meagre materials +the biographer builds a cobhouse of conjectures as big as the Coliseum; +conjectures which convince him, the prosecuting attorney, but ought to +fall far short of convincing any fair-minded jury. + +Shelley's love-poems may be very good evidence, but we know well that +they are “good for this day and train only.” We are able to believe that +they spoke the truth for that one day, but we know by experience +that they could not be depended on to speak it the next. The very +supplication for a rewarming of Harriet's chilled love was followed so +suddenly by the poet's plunge into an adoring passion for Mary Godwin +that if it had been a check it would have lost its value before a lazy +person could have gotten to the bank with it. + +Hardness, stubbornness, pride, vindictiveness--these may sometimes +reside in a young wife and mother of nineteen, but they are not charged +against Harriet Shelley outside of that poem, and one has no right +to insert them into her character on such shadowy “evidence” as that. +Peacock knew Harriet well, and she has a flexible and persuadable look, +as painted by him: + + “Her manners were good, and her whole aspect and demeanor such + manifest emanations of pure and truthful nature that to be once + in her company was to know her thoroughly. She was fond of her + husband, and accommodated herself in every way to his tastes. + If they mixed in society, she adorned it; if they lived in + retirement, she was satisfied; if they travelled, she enjoyed + the change of scene.” + +“Perhaps” she had never desired that the breach should be irreparable +and complete. The truth is, we do not even know that there was any +breach at all at this time. We know that the husband and wife went +before the altar and took a new oath on the 24th of March to love and +cherish each other until death--and this may be regarded as a sort of +reconciliation itself, and a wiping out of the old grudges. Then Harriet +went away, and the sister-in-law removed herself from her society. That +was in April. Shelley wrote his “appeal” in May, but the corresponding +went right along afterwards. We have a right to doubt that the subject +of it was a “reconciliation,” or that Harriet had any suspicion that she +needed to be reconciled and that her husband was trying to persuade +her to it--as the biographer has sought to make us believe, with his +Coliseum of conjectures built out of a waste-basket of poetry. For we +have “evidence” now--not poetry and conjecture. When Shelley had been +dining daily in the Skinner Street paradise fifteen days and continuing +the love-match which was already a fortnight old twenty-five days +earlier, he forgot to write Harriet; forgot it the next day and the +next. During four days Harriet got no letter from him. Then her fright +and anxiety rose to expression-heat, and she wrote a letter to Shelley's +publisher which seems to reveal to us that Shelley's letters to her +had been the customary affectionate letters of husband to wife, and had +carried no appeals for reconciliation and had not needed to: + “BATH (postmark July 7, 1814). + + “MY DEAR SIR,--You will greatly oblige me by giving the + enclosed to Mr. Shelley. I would not trouble you, but it is + now four days since I have heard from him, which to me is an + age. Will you write by return of post and tell me what has + become of him? as I always fancy something dreadful has + happened if I do not hear from him. If you tell me that he is + well I shall not come to London, but if I do not hear from you + or him I shall certainly come, as I cannot endure this dreadful + state of suspense. You are his friend and you can feel for me. + + “I remain yours truly, + + “H. S.” + + +Even without Peacock's testimony that “her whole aspect and demeanor +were manifest emanations of a pure and truthful nature,” we should hold +this to be a truthful letter, a sincere letter, a loving letter; it +bears those marks; I think it is also the letter of a person accustomed +to receiving letters from her husband frequently, and that they have +been of a welcome and satisfactory sort, too, this long time back--ever +since the solemn remarriage and reconciliation at the altar most likely. + +The biographer follows Harriet's letter with a conjecture. He +conjectures that she “would now gladly have retraced her steps.” Which +means that it is proven that she had steps to retrace--proven by the +poem. Well, if the poem is better evidence than the letter, we must let +it stand at that. + +Then the biographer attacks Harriet Shelley's honor--by authority of +random and unverified gossip scavengered from a group of people whose +very names make a person shudder: Mary Godwin, mistress to Shelley; her +part-sister, discarded mistress of Lord Byron; Godwin, the philosophical +tramp, who gathers his share of it from a shadow--that is to say, from +a person whom he shirks out of naming. Yet the biographer dignifies this +sorry rubbish with the name of “evidence.” + +Nothing remotely resembling a distinct charge from a named person +professing to know is offered among this precious “evidence.” + +1. “Shelley believed” so and so. + +2. Byron's discarded mistress says that Shelley told Mary Godwin so and +so, and Mary told her. + +3. “Shelley said” so and so--and later “admitted over and over again +that he had been in error.” + +4. The unspeakable Godwin “wrote to Mr. Baxter” that he knew so and so +“from unquestionable authority”--name not furnished. + +How any man in his right mind could bring himself to defile the grave +of a shamefully abused and defenseless girl with these baseless +fabrications, this manufactured filth, is inconceivable. How any man, in +his right mind or out of it, could sit down and coldly try to persuade +anybody to believe it, or listen patiently to it, or, indeed, do +anything but scoff at it and deride it, is astonishing. + +The charge insinuated by these odious slanders is one of the most +difficult of all offenses to prove; it is also one which no man has +a right to mention even in a whisper about any woman, living or dead, +unless he knows it to be true, and not even then unless he can also +prove it to be true. There is no justification for the abomination of +putting this stuff in the book. + +Against Harriet Shelley's good name there is not one scrap of tarnishing +evidence, and not even a scrap of evil gossip, that comes from a source +that entitles it to a hearing. + +On the credit side of the account we have strong opinions from the +people who knew her best. Peacock says: + + “I feel it due to the memory of Harriet to state my most + decided conviction that her conduct as a wife was as pure, as + true, as absolutely faultless, as that of any who for such + conduct are held most in honor.” + +Thornton Hunt, who had picked and published slight flaws in Harriet's +character, says, as regards this alleged large one: + + “There is not a trace of evidence or a whisper of scandal + against her before her voluntary departure from Shelley.” + +Trelawney says: + + “I was assured by the evidence of the few friends who knew both + Shelley and his wife--Hookham, Hogg, Peacock, and one of the + Godwins--that Harriet was perfectly innocent of all offense.” + +What excuse was there for raking up a parcel of foul rumors from +malicious and discredited sources and flinging them at this dead girl's +head? Her very defenselessness should have been her protection. The fact +that all letters to her or about her, with almost every scrap of her own +writing, had been diligently mislaid, leaving her case destitute of a +voice, while every pen-stroke which could help her husband's side had +been as diligently preserved, should have excused her from being brought +to trial. Her witnesses have all disappeared, yet we see her summoned +in her grave-clothes to plead for the life of her character, without the +help of an advocate, before a disqualified judge and a packed jury. + +Harriet Shelley wrote her distressed letter on the 7th of July. On the +28th her husband ran away with Mary Godwin and her part-sister Claire +to the Continent. He deserted his wife when her confinement was +approaching. She bore him a child at the end of November, his mistress +bore him another one something over two months later. The truants were +back in London before either of these events occurred. + +On one occasion, presently, Shelley was so pressed for money to support +his mistress with that he went to his wife and got some money of his +that was in her hands--twenty pounds. Yet the mistress was not moved +to gratitude; for later, when the wife was troubled to meet her +engagements, the mistress makes this entry in her diary: + + “Harriet sends her creditors here; nasty woman. Now we shall + have to change our lodgings.” + +The deserted wife bore the bitterness and obloquy of her situation two +years and a quarter; then she gave up, and drowned herself. A month +afterwards the body was found in the water. Three weeks later Shelley +married his mistress. + +I must here be allowed to italicize a remark of the biographer's +concerning Harriet Shelley: + + “That no act of Shelley's during the two years which + immediately preceded her death tended to cause the rash act + which brought her life to its close seems certain.” + +Yet her husband had deserted her and her children, and was living with a +concubine all that time! Why should a person attempt to write biography +when the simplest facts have no meaning to him? This book is littered +with as crass stupidities as that one--deductions by the page which bear +no discoverable kinship to their premises. + +The biographer throws off that extraordinary remark without any +perceptible disturbance to his serenity; for he follows it with a +sentimental justification of Shelley's conduct which has not a pang of +conscience in it, but is silky and smooth and undulating and pious--a +cake-walk with all the colored brethren at their best. There may be +people who can read that page and keep their temper, but it is doubtful. +Shelley's life has the one indelible blot upon it, but is otherwise +worshipfully noble and beautiful. It even stands out indestructibly +gracious and lovely from the ruck of these disastrous pages, in spite +of the fact that they expose and establish his responsibility for his +forsaken wife's pitiful fate--a responsibility which he himself tacitly +admits in a letter to Eliza Westbrook, wherein he refers to his taking +up with Mary Godwin as an act which Eliza “might excusably regard as the +cause of her sister's ruin.” + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of In Defense of Harriet Shelley by +Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY*** + +***** This file should be named 3171-0.txt or 3171-0.zip ***** This and all +associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/7/3171/ + +Produced by David Widger + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will be +renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no one +owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and +you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission +and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in +the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and +distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the +PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a +registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, +unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge anything +for copies of this eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You +may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative +works, reports, performances and research. They may be modified and +printed and given away--you may do practically ANYTHING with public +domain eBooks. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, +especially commercial redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU +DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree +to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the +terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all +copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used +on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree +to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that +you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works even without +complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C +below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help +preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. +See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” + or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in +the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you +are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent +you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating +derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project +Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the +Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic +works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with +the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name +associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this +agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached +full Project Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with +others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing +or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project +Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost +no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use +it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this +eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with +the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, +you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through +1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute +this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other +than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain +Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full +Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access +to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.” + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free +distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth +in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from both the +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael Hart, the +owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as +set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm collection. +Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, and the +medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but +not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription +errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a +defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right +of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. +YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, +BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN +PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND +ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR +ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES +EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect +in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written +explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received +the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your +written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the +defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, +the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will remain +freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and +permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. To +learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and +how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the +Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state +of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue +Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification number +is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, +email business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official page +at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide spread +public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing +the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely +distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest array +of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to +$5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with +the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state +visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any +statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside +the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways +including including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. unless +a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks +in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, including +how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to +our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/3171-0.zip b/3171-0.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d89e14 --- /dev/null +++ b/3171-0.zip diff --git a/3171-h.zip b/3171-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..173ac75 --- /dev/null +++ b/3171-h.zip diff --git a/3171-h/3171-h.htm b/3171-h/3171-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9b52dc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/3171-h/3171-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2344 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> + +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" > + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta content="pg2html (binary v0.17)" name="linkgenerator" /> + <title> + In Defense of Harriet Shelley, by Mark Twain + </title> + <style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve"> + + body { margin:5%; background:#faebd7; text-align:justify} + P { text-indent: 1em; margin-top: .25em; margin-bottom: .25em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; } + hr { width: 50%; text-align: center;} + .foot { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 90%; } + blockquote {font-size: 97%; font-style: italic; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + .mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;} + .toc { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;} + .toc2 { margin-left: 20%;} + div.fig { display:block; margin:0 auto; text-align:center; } + .figleft {float: left; margin-left: 0%; margin-right: 1%;} + .figright {float: right; margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 1%;} + pre { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 5%;} + +</style> + </head> + <body> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +The Project Gutenberg EBook of In Defense of Harriet Shelley by Mark +Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost +no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use +it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this +eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: In Defense of Harriet Shelley + +Author: Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +Release Date: August 20, 2006 [EBook #3171] +Last Updated: February 24, 2018 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY*** + + + + +Produced by David Widger + + + + + +</pre> + <h1> + IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY + </h1> + <h2> + by Mark Twain + </h2> + <p> + <br /> <br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <br /> <br /> + </p> + <h3> + Contents + </h3> + <table summary="” style=" cellpadding="4” border="> + <tr> + <td> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0001"> I </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0002"> II </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0003"> III </a> + </p> + </td> + </tr> + </table> + <p> + <br /> <br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <br /> <br /> <a name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"> + <!-- H2 anchor --> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + I + </h2> + <p> + I have committed sins, of course; but I have not committed enough of them + to entitle me to the punishment of reduction to the bread and water of + ordinary literature during six years when I might have been living on the + fat diet spread for the righteous in Professor Dowden's Life of + Shelley, if I had been justly dealt with. + </p> + <p> + During these six years I have been living a life of peaceful ignorance. I + was not aware that Shelley's first wife was unfaithful to him, and + that that was why he deserted her and wiped the stain from his sensitive + honor by entering into soiled relations with Godwin's young + daughter. This was all new to me when I heard it lately, and was told that + the proofs of it were in this book, and that this book's verdict is + accepted in the girls' colleges of America and its view taught in + their literary classes. + </p> + <p> + In each of these six years multitudes of young people in our country have + arrived at the Shelley-reading age. Are these six multitudes unacquainted + with this life of Shelley? Perhaps they are; indeed, one may feel pretty + sure that the great bulk of them are. To these, then, I address myself, in + the hope that some account of this romantic historical fable and the + fabulist's manner of constructing and adorning it may interest them. + </p> + <p> + First, as to its literary style. Our negroes in America have several ways + of entertaining themselves which are not found among the whites anywhere. + Among these inventions of theirs is one which is particularly popular with + them. It is a competition in elegant deportment. They hire a hall and bank + the spectators' seats in rising tiers along the two sides, leaving + all the middle stretch of the floor free. A cake is provided as a prize + for the winner in the competition, and a bench of experts in deportment is + appointed to award it. Sometimes there are as many as fifty contestants, + male and female, and five hundred spectators. One at a time the + contestants enter, clothed regardless of expense in what each considers + the perfection of style and taste, and walk down the vacant central space + and back again with that multitude of critical eyes on them. All that the + competitor knows of fine airs and graces he throws into his carriage, all + that he knows of seductive expression he throws into his countenance. He + may use all the helps he can devise: watch-chain to twirl with his + fingers, cane to do graceful things with, snowy handkerchief to flourish + and get artful effects out of, shiny new stovepipe hat to assist in his + courtly bows; and the colored lady may have a fan to work up her effects + with, and smile over and blush behind, and she may add other helps, + according to her judgment. When the review by individual detail is over, a + grand review of all the contestants in procession follows, with all the + airs and graces and all the bowings and smirkings on exhibition at once, + and this enables the bench of experts to make the necessary comparisons + and arrive at a verdict. The successful competitor gets the prize which I + have before mentioned, and an abundance of applause and envy along with + it. The negroes have a name for this grave deportment-tournament; a name + taken from the prize contended for. They call it a Cake-walk. + </p> + <p> + This Shelley biography is a literary cake-walk. The ordinary forms of + speech are absent from it. All the pages, all the paragraphs, walk by + sedately, elegantly, not to say mincingly, in their Sunday-best, shiny and + sleek, perfumed, and with boutonnieres in their button-holes; it is rare + to find even a chance sentence that has forgotten to dress. If the book + wishes to tell us that Mary Godwin, child of sixteen, had known + afflictions, the fact saunters forth in this nobby outfit: “Mary was + herself not unlearned in the lore of pain”—meaning by that + that she had not always traveled on asphalt; or, as some authorities would + frame it, that she had “been there herself,” a form which, + while preferable to the book's form, is still not to be recommended. + If the book wishes to tell us that Harriet Shelley hired a wet-nurse, that + commonplace fact gets turned into a dancing-master, who does his + professional bow before us in pumps and knee-breeches, with his fiddle + under one arm and his crush-hat under the other, thus: “The beauty + of Harriet's motherly relation to her babe was marred in Shelley's + eyes by the introduction into his house of a hireling nurse to whom was + delegated the mother's tenderest office.” + </p> + <p> + This is perhaps the strangest book that has seen the light since + Frankenstein. Indeed, it is a Frankenstein itself; a Frankenstein with the + original infirmity supplemented by a new one; a Frankenstein with the + reasoning faculty wanting. Yet it believes it can reason, and is always + trying. It is not content to leave a mountain of fact standing in the + clear sunshine, where the simplest reader can perceive its form, its + details, and its relation to the rest of the landscape, but thinks it must + help him examine it and understand it; so its drifting mind settles upon + it with that intent, but always with one and the same result: there is a + change of temperature and the mountain is hid in a fog. Every time it sets + up a premise and starts to reason from it, there is a surprise in store + for the reader. It is strangely nearsighted, cross-eyed, and purblind. + Sometimes when a mastodon walks across the field of its vision it takes it + for a rat; at other times it does not see it at all. + </p> + <p> + The materials of this biographical fable are facts, rumors, and poetry. + They are connected together and harmonized by the help of suggestion, + conjecture, innuendo, perversion, and semi-suppression. + </p> + <p> + The fable has a distinct object in view, but this object is not + acknowledged in set words. Percy Bysshe Shelley has done something which + in the case of other men is called a grave crime; it must be shown that in + his case it is not that, because he does not think as other men do about + these things. + </p> + <p> + Ought not that to be enough, if the fabulist is serious? Having proved + that a crime is not a crime, was it worth while to go on and fasten the + responsibility of a crime which was not a crime upon somebody else? What + is the use of hunting down and holding to bitter account people who are + responsible for other people's innocent acts? + </p> + <p> + Still, the fabulist thinks it a good idea to do that. In his view Shelley's + first wife, Harriet, free of all offense as far as we have historical + facts for guidance, must be held unforgivably responsible for her husband's + innocent act in deserting her and taking up with another woman. + </p> + <p> + Any one will suspect that this task has its difficulties. Any one will + divine that nice work is necessary here, cautious work, wily work, and + that there is entertainment to be had in watching the magician do it. + There is indeed entertainment in watching him. He arranges his facts, his + rumors, and his poems on his table in full view of the house, and shows + you that everything is there—no deception, everything fair and above + board. And this is apparently true, yet there is a defect, for some of his + best stock is hid in an appendix-basket behind the door, and you do not + come upon it until the exhibition is over and the enchantment of your mind + accomplished—as the magician thinks. + </p> + <p> + There is an insistent atmosphere of candor and fairness about this book + which is engaging at first, then a little burdensome, then a trifle + fatiguing, then progressively suspicious, annoying, irritating, and + oppressive. It takes one some little time to find out that phrases which + seem intended to guide the reader aright are there to mislead him; that + phrases which seem intended to throw light are there to throw darkness; + that phrases which seem intended to interpret a fact are there to + misinterpret it; that phrases which seem intended to forestall prejudice + are there to create it; that phrases which seem antidotes are poisons in + disguise. The naked facts arrayed in the book establish Shelley's + guilt in that one episode which disfigures his otherwise superlatively + lofty and beautiful life; but the historian's careful and methodical + misinterpretation of them transfers the responsibility to the wife's + shoulders as he persuades himself. The few meager facts of Harriet Shelley's + life, as furnished by the book, acquit her of offense; but by calling in + the forbidden helps of rumor, gossip, conjecture, insinuation, and + innuendo he destroys her character and rehabilitates Shelley's—as + he believes. And in truth his unheroic work has not been barren of the + results he aimed at; as witness the assertion made to me that girls in the + colleges of America are taught that Harriet Shelley put a stain upon her + husband's honor, and that that was what stung him into repurifying + himself by deserting her and his child and entering into scandalous + relations with a school-girl acquaintance of his. + </p> + <p> + If that assertion is true, they probably use a reduction of this work in + those colleges, maybe only a sketch outlined from it. Such a thing as that + could be harmful and misleading. They ought to cast it out and put the + whole book in its place. It would not deceive. It would not deceive the + janitor. + </p> + <p> + All of this book is interesting on account of the sorcerer's methods + and the attractiveness of some of his characters and the repulsiveness of + the rest, but no part of it is so much so as are the chapters wherein he + tries to think he thinks he sets forth the causes which led to Shelley's + desertion of his wife in 1814. + </p> + <p> + Harriet Westbrook was a school-girl sixteen years old. Shelley was teeming + with advanced thought. He believed that Christianity was a degrading and + selfish superstition, and he had a deep and sincere desire to rescue one + of his sisters from it. Harriet was impressed by his various philosophies + and looked upon him as an intellectual wonder—which indeed he was. + He had an idea that she could give him valuable help in his scheme + regarding his sister; therefore he asked her to correspond with him. She + was quite willing. Shelley was not thinking of love, for he was just + getting over a passion for his cousin, Harriet Grove, and just getting + well steeped in one for Miss Hitchener, a school-teacher. What might + happen to Harriet Westbrook before the letter-writing was ended did not + enter his mind. Yet an older person could have made a good guess at it, + for in person Shelley was as beautiful as an angel, he was frank, sweet, + winning, unassuming, and so rich in unselfishness, generosities, and + magnanimities that he made his whole generation seem poor in these great + qualities by comparison. Besides, he was in distress. His college had + expelled him for writing an atheistical pamphlet and afflicting the + reverend heads of the university with it, his rich father and grandfather + had closed their purses against him, his friends were cold. Necessarily, + Harriet fell in love with him; and so deeply, indeed, that there was no + way for Shelley to save her from suicide but to marry her. He believed + himself to blame for this state of things, so the marriage took place. He + was pretty fairly in love with Harriet, although he loved Miss Hitchener + better. He wrote and explained the case to Miss Hitchener after the + wedding, and he could not have been franker or more naive and less stirred + up about the circumstance if the matter in issue had been a commercial + transaction involving thirty-five dollars. + </p> + <p> + Shelley was nineteen. He was not a youth, but a man. He had never had any + youth. He was an erratic and fantastic child during eighteen years, then + he stepped into manhood, as one steps over a door-sill. He was curiously + mature at nineteen in his ability to do independent thinking on the deep + questions of life and to arrive at sharply definite decisions regarding + them, and stick to them—stick to them and stand by them at cost of + bread, friendships, esteem, respect, and approbation. + </p> + <p> + For the sake of his opinions he was willing to sacrifice all these + valuable things, and did sacrifice them; and went on doing it, too, when + he could at any moment have made himself rich and supplied himself with + friends and esteem by compromising with his father, at the moderate + expense of throwing overboard one or two indifferent details of his cargo + of principles. + </p> + <p> + He and Harriet eloped to Scotland and got married. They took lodgings in + Edinburgh of a sort answerable to their purse, which was about empty, and + there their life was a happy, one and grew daily more so. They had only + themselves for company, but they needed no additions to it. They were as + cozy and contented as birds in a nest. Harriet sang evenings or read + aloud; also she studied and tried to improve her mind, her husband + instructing her in Latin. She was very beautiful, she was modest, quiet, + genuine, and, according to her husband's testimony, she had no fine + lady airs or aspirations about her. In Matthew Arnold's judgment, + she was “a pleasing figure.” + </p> + <p> + The pair remained five weeks in Edinburgh, and then took lodgings in York, + where Shelley's college mate, Hogg, lived. Shelley presently ran + down to London, and Hogg took this opportunity to make love to the young + wife. She repulsed him, and reported the fact to her husband when he got + back. It seems a pity that Shelley did not copy this creditable conduct of + hers some time or other when under temptation, so that we might have seen + the author of his biography hang the miracle in the skies and squirt + rainbows at it. + </p> + <p> + At the end of the first year of marriage—the most trying year for + any young couple, for then the mutual failings are coming one by one to + light, and the necessary adjustments are being made in pain and + tribulation—Shelley was able to recognize that his marriage venture + had been a safe one. As we have seen, his love for his wife had begun in a + rather shallow way and with not much force, but now it was become deep and + strong, which entitles his wife to a broad credit mark, one may admit. He + addresses a long and loving poem to her, in which both passion and worship + appear: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit A + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “O thou + Whose dear love gleamed upon the gloomy path + Which this lone spirit travelled, + ............. + ... wilt thou not turn + Those spirit-beaming eyes and look on me. + Until I be assured that Earth is Heaven + And Heaven is Earth? + ........ + Harriet! let death all mortal ties dissolve, + But ours shall not be mortal.” + </pre> + <p> + Shelley also wrote a sonnet to her in August of this same year in + celebration of her birthday: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit B + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Ever as now with Love and Virtue's glow + May thy unwithering soul not cease to burn, + Still may thine heart with those pure thoughts o'erflow + Which force from mine such quick and warm return.” + </pre> + <p> + Was the girl of seventeen glad and proud and happy? We may conjecture that + she was. + </p> + <p> + That was the year 1812. Another year passed still happily, still + successfully—a child was born in June, 1813, and in September, three + months later, Shelley addresses a poem to this child, Ianthe, in which he + points out just when the little creature is most particularly dear to him: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit C + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Dearest when most thy tender traits express + The image of thy mother's loveliness.” + </pre> + <p> + Up to this point the fabulist counsel for Shelley and prosecutor of his + young wife has had easy sailing, but now his trouble begins, for Shelley + is getting ready to make some unpleasant history for himself, and it will + be necessary to put the blame of it on the wife. + </p> + <p> + Shelley had made the acquaintance of a charming gray-haired, young-hearted + Mrs. Boinville, whose face “retained a certain youthful beauty”; + she lived at Bracknell, and had a young daughter named Cornelia Turner, + who was equipped with many fascinations. Apparently these people were + sufficiently sentimental. Hogg says of Mrs. Boinville: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “The greater part of her associates were odious. I generally + found there two or three sentimental young butchers, an + eminently philosophical tinker, and several very + unsophisticated medical practitioners or medical students, all + of low origin and vulgar and offensive manners. They sighed, + turned up their eyes, retailed philosophy, such as it was,” + etc. +</pre> + <p> + Shelley moved to Bracknell, July 27th (this is still 1813) purposely to be + near this unwholesome prairie-dogs' nest. The fabulist says: “It + was the entrance into a world more amiable and exquisite than he had yet + known.” + </p> + <p> + “In this acquaintance the attraction was mutual”—and + presently it grew to be very mutual indeed, between Shelley and Cornelia + Turner, when they got to studying the Italian poets together. Shelley, + “responding like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion + or of sentiment,” had his chance here. It took only four days for + Cornelia's attractions to begin to dim Harriet's. Shelley + arrived on the 27th of July; on the 31st he wrote a sonnet to Harriet in + which “one detects already the little rift in the lover's lute + which had seemed to be healed or never to have gaped at all when the later + and happier sonnet to Ianthe was written”—in September, we + remember: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit D + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “EVENING. TO HARRIET + + “O thou bright Sun! Beneath the dark blue line + Of western distance that sublime descendest, + And, gleaming lovelier as thy beams decline, + Thy million hues to every vapor lendest, + And over cobweb, lawn, and grove, and stream + Sheddest the liquid magic of thy light, + Till calm Earth, with the parting splendor bright, + Shows like the vision of a beauteous dream; + What gazer now with astronomic eye + Could coldly count the spots within thy sphere? + Such were thy lover, Harriet, could he fly + The thoughts of all that makes his passion dear, + And turning senseless from thy warm caress + Pick flaws in our close-woven happiness.” + </pre> + <p> + I cannot find the “rift”; still it may be there. What the poem + seems to say is, that a person would be coldly ungrateful who could + consent to count and consider little spots and flaws in such a warm, + great, satisfying sun as Harriet is. It is a “little rift which had + seemed to be healed, or never to have gaped at all.” That is, + “one detects” a little rift which perhaps had never existed. + How does one do that? How does one see the invisible? It is the fabulist's + secret; he knows how to detect what does not exist, he knows how to see + what is not seeable; it is his gift, and he works it many a time to poor + dead Harriet Shelley's deep damage. + </p> + <p> + “As yet, however, if there was a speck upon Shelley's + happiness it was no more than a speck”—meaning the one which + one detects where “it may never have gaped at all”—“nor + had Harriet cause for discontent.” + </p> + <p> + Shelley's Latin instructions to his wife had ceased. “From a + teacher he had now become a pupil.” Mrs. Boinville and her young + married daughter Cornelia were teaching him Italian poetry; a fact which + warns one to receive with some caution that other statement that Harriet + had no “cause for discontent.” + </p> + <p> + Shelley had stopped instructing Harriet in Latin, as before mentioned. The + biographer thinks that the busy life in London some time back, and the + intrusion of the baby, account for this. These were hindrances, but were + there no others? He is always overlooking a detail here and there that + might be valuable in helping us understand a situation. For instance, when + a man has been hard at work at the Italian poets with a pretty woman, hour + after hour, and responding like a tremulous instrument to every breath of + passion or of sentiment in the meantime, that man is dog-tired when he + gets home, and he can't teach his wife Latin; it would be + unreasonable to expect it. + </p> + <p> + Up to this time we have submitted to having Mrs. Boinville pushed upon us + as ostensibly concerned in these Italian lessons, but the biographer drops + her now, of his own accord. Cornelia “perhaps” is sole + teacher. Hogg says she was a prey to a kind of sweet melancholy, arising + from causes purely imaginary; she required consolation, and found it in + Petrarch. He also says, “Bysshe entered at once fully into her views + and caught the soft infection, breathing the tenderest and sweetest + melancholy, as every true poet ought.” + </p> + <p> + Then the author of the book interlards a most stately and fine compliment + to Cornelia, furnished by a man of approved judgment who knew her well + “in later years.” It is a very good compliment indeed, and she + no doubt deserved it in her “later years,” when she had for + generations ceased to be sentimental and lackadaisical, and was no longer + engaged in enchanting young husbands and sowing sorrow for young wives. + But why is that compliment to that old gentlewoman intruded there? Is it + to make the reader believe she was well-chosen and safe society for a + young, sentimental husband? The biographer's device was not well + planned. That old person was not present—it was her other self that + was there, her young, sentimental, melancholy, warm-blooded self, in those + early sweet times before antiquity had cooled her off and mossed her back. + </p> + <p> + “In choosing for friends such women as Mrs. Newton, Mrs. Boinville, + and Cornelia Turner, Shelley gave good proof of his insight and + discrimination.” That is the fabulist's opinion—Harriet + Shelley's is not reported. + </p> + <p> + Early in August, Shelley was in London trying to raise money. In September + he wrote the poem to the baby, already quoted from. In the first week of + October Shelley and family went to Warwick, then to Edinburgh, arriving + there about the middle of the month. + </p> + <p> + “Harriet was happy.” Why? The author furnishes a reason, but + hides from us whether it is history or conjecture; it is because “the + babe had borne the journey well.” It has all the aspect of one of + his artful devices—flung in in his favorite casual way—the way + he has when he wants to draw one's attention away from an obvious + thing and amuse it with some trifle that is less obvious but more useful—in + a history like this. The obvious thing is, that Harriet was happy because + there was much territory between her husband and Cornelia Turner now; and + because the perilous Italian lessons were taking a rest; and because, if + there chanced to be any respondings like a tremulous instrument to every + breath of passion or of sentiment in stock in these days, she might hope + to get a share of them herself; and because, with her husband liberated, + now, from the fetid fascinations of that sentimental retreat so pitilessly + described by Hogg, who also dubbed it “Shelley's paradise” + later, she might hope to persuade him to stay away from it permanently; + and because she might also hope that his brain would cool, now, and his + heart become healthy, and both brain and heart consider the situation and + resolve that it would be a right and manly thing to stand by this + girl-wife and her child and see that they were honorably dealt with, and + cherished and protected and loved by the man that had promised these + things, and so be made happy and kept so. And because, also—may we + conjecture this?—we may hope for the privilege of taking up our cozy + Latin lessons again, that used to be so pleasant, and brought us so near + together—so near, indeed, that often our heads touched, just as + heads do over Italian lessons; and our hands met in casual and + unintentional, but still most delicious and thrilling little contacts and + momentary clasps, just as they inevitably do over Italian lessons. Suppose + one should say to any young wife: “I find that your husband is + poring over the Italian poets and being instructed in the beautiful + Italian language by the lovely Cornelia Robinson”—would that + cozy picture fail to rise before her mind? would its possibilities fail to + suggest themselves to her? would there be a pang in her heart and a blush + on her face? or, on the contrary, would the remark give her pleasure, make + her joyous and gay? Why, one needs only to make the experiment—the + result will not be uncertain. + </p> + <p> + However, we learn—by authority of deeply reasoned and searching + conjecture—that the baby bore the journey well, and that that was + why the young wife was happy. That accounts for two per cent. of the + happiness, but it was not right to imply that it accounted for the other + ninety-eight also. + </p> + <p> + Peacock, a scholar, poet, and friend of the Shelleys, was of their party + when they went away. He used to laugh at the Boinville menagerie, and + “was not a favorite.” One of the Boinville group, writing to + Hogg, said, “The Shelleys have made an addition to their party in + the person of a cold scholar, who, I think, has neither taste nor feeling. + This, Shelley will perceive sooner or later, for his warm nature craves + sympathy.” True, and Shelley will fight his way back there to get it—there + will be no way to head him off. + </p> + <p> + Toward the end of November it was necessary for Shelley to pay a business + visit to London, and he conceived the project of leaving Harriet and the + baby in Edinburgh with Harriet's sister, Eliza Westbrook, a + sensible, practical maiden lady about thirty years old, who had spent a + great part of her time with the family since the marriage. She was an + estimable woman, and Shelley had had reason to like her, and did like her; + but along about this time his feeling towards her changed. Part of Shelley's + plan, as he wrote Hogg, was to spend his London evenings with the Newtons—members + of the Boinville Hysterical Society. But, alas, when he arrived early in + December, that pleasant game was partially blocked, for Eliza and the + family arrived with him. We are left destitute of conjectures at this + point by the biographer, and it is my duty to supply one. I chance the + conjecture that it was Eliza who interfered with that game. I think she + tried to do what she could towards modifying the Boinville connection, in + the interest of her young sister's peace and honor. + </p> + <p> + If it was she who blocked that game, she was not strong enough to block + the next one. Before the month and year were out—no date given, let + us call it Christmas—Shelley and family were nested in a furnished + house in Windsor, “at no great distance from the Boinvilles”—these + decoys still residing at Bracknell. + </p> + <p> + What we need, now, is a misleading conjecture. We get it with + characteristic promptness and depravity: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “But Prince Athanase found not the aged Zonoras, the friend of + his boyhood, in any wanderings to Windsor. Dr. Lind had died + a year since, and with his death Windsor must have lost, for + Shelley, its chief attraction.” + </pre> + <p> + Still, not to mention Shelley's wife, there was Bracknell, at any + rate. While Bracknell remains, all solace is not lost. Shelley is + represented by this biographer as doing a great many careless things, but + to my mind this hiring a furnished house for three months in order to be + with a man who has been dead a year, is the carelessest of them all. One + feels for him—that is but natural, and does us honor besides—yet + one is vexed, for all that. He could have written and asked about the aged + Zonoras before taking the house. He may not have had the address, but that + is nothing—any postman would know the aged Zonoras; a dead postman + would remember a name like that. + </p> + <p> + And yet, why throw a rag like this to us ravening wolves? Is it seriously + supposable that we will stop to chew it and let our prey escape? No, we + are getting to expect this kind of device, and to give it merely a sniff + for certainty's sake and then walk around it and leave it lying. + Shelley was not after the aged Zonoras; he was pointed for Cornelia and + the Italian lessons, for his warm nature was craving sympathy. + </p> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002"> + <!-- H2 anchor --> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + II + </h2> + <h3> + The year 1813 is just ended now, and we step into 1814. + </h3> + <p> + To recapitulate, how much of Cornelia's society has Shelley had, + thus far? Portions of August and September, and four days of July. That is + to say, he has had opportunity to enjoy it, more or less, during that + brief period. Did he want some more of it? We must fall back upon history, + and then go to conjecturing. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “In the early part of the year 1814, Shelley was a frequent + visitor at Bracknell.” + </pre> + <p> + “Frequent” is a cautious word, in this author's mouth; + the very cautiousness of it, the vagueness of it, provokes suspicion; it + makes one suspect that this frequency was more frequent than the mere + common everyday kinds of frequency which one is in the habit of averaging + up with the unassuming term “frequent.” I think so because + they fixed up a bedroom for him in the Boinville house. One doesn't + need a bedroom if one is only going to run over now and then in a + disconnected way to respond like a tremulous instrument to every breath of + passion or of sentiment and rub up one's Italian poetry a little. + </p> + <p> + The young wife was not invited, perhaps. If she was, she most certainly + did not come, or she would have straightened the room up; the most + ignorant of us knows that a wife would not endure a room in the condition + in which Hogg found this one when he occupied it one night. Shelley was + away—why, nobody can divine. Clothes were scattered about, there + were books on every side: “Wherever a book could be laid was an open + book turned down on its face to keep its place.” It seems plain that + the wife was not invited. No, not that; I think she was invited, but said + to herself that she could not bear to go there and see another young woman + touching heads with her husband over an Italian book and making thrilling + hand-contacts with him accidentally. + </p> + <p> + As remarked, he was a frequent visitor there, “where he found an + easeful resting-place in the house of Mrs. Boinville—the + white-haired Maimuna—and of her daughter, Mrs. Turner.” The + aged Zonoras was deceased, but the white-haired Maimuna was still on deck, + as we see. “Three charming ladies entertained the mocker (Hogg) with + cups of tea, late hours, Wieland's Agathon, sighs and smiles, and + the celestial manna of refined sentiment.” + </p> + <p> + “Such,” says Hogg, “were the delights of Shelley's + paradise in Bracknell.” + </p> + <p> + The white-haired Maimuna presently writes to Hogg: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “I will not have you despise home-spun pleasures. Shelley is + making a trial of them with us—” + </pre> + <p> + A trial of them. It may be called that. It was March 11, and he had been + in the house a month. She continues: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Shelley “likes them so well that he is resolved to leave off + rambling—” + </pre> + <p> + But he has already left it off. He has been there a month. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “And begin a course of them himself.” + </pre> + <p> + But he has already begun it. He has been at it a month. He likes it so + well that he has forgotten all about his wife, as a letter of his reveals. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Seriously, I think his mind and body want rest.” + </pre> + <p> + Yet he has been resting both for a month, with Italian, and tea, and manna + of sentiment, and late hours, and every restful thing a young husband + could need for the refreshment of weary limbs and a sore conscience, and a + nagging sense of shabbiness and treachery. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “His journeys after what he has never found have racked his + purse and his tranquillity. He is resolved to take a little + care of the former, in pity to the latter, which I applaud, and + shall second with all my might.” + </pre> + <p> + But she does not say whether the young wife, a stranger and lonely yonder, + wants another woman and her daughter Cornelia to be lavishing so much + inflamed interest on her husband or not. That young wife is always silent—we + are never allowed to hear from her. She must have opinions about such + things, she cannot be indifferent, she must be approving or disapproving, + surely she would speak if she were allowed—even to-day and from her + grave she would, if she could, I think—but we get only the other + side, they keep her silent always. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “He has deeply interested us. In the course of your intimacy + he must have made you feel what we now feel for him. He is + seeking a house close to us—” + </pre> + <p> + Ah! he is not close enough yet, it seems— + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “and if he succeeds we shall have an additional motive to + induce you to come among us in the summer.” + </pre> + <p> + The reader would puzzle a long time and not guess the biographer's + comment upon the above letter. It is this: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “These sound like words of A considerate and judicious friend.” + </pre> + <p> + That is what he thinks. That is, it is what he thinks he thinks. No, that + is not quite it: it is what he thinks he can stupefy a particularly and + unspeakably dull reader into thinking it is what he thinks. He makes that + comment with the knowledge that Shelley is in love with this woman's + daughter, and that it is because of the fascinations of these two that + Shelley has deserted his wife—for this month, considering all the + circumstances, and his new passion, and his employment of the time, + amounted to desertion; that is its rightful name. We cannot know how the + wife regarded it and felt about it; but if she could have read the letter + which Shelley was writing to Hogg four or five days later, we could guess + her thought and how she felt. Hear him:....... + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “I have been staying with Mrs. Boinville for the last month; + I have escaped, in the society of all that philosophy and + friendship combine, from the dismaying solitude of myself.” + </pre> + <p> + It is fair to conjecture that he was feeling ashamed. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “They have revived in my heart the expiring flame of life. + I have felt myself translated to a paradise which has nothing + of mortality but its transitoriness; my heart sickens at the + view of that necessity which will quickly divide me from the + delightful tranquillity of this happy home—for it has become + my home. + ....... + “Eliza is still with us—not here!—but will be with me when + the infinite malice of destiny forces me to depart.” + </pre> + <p> + Eliza is she who blocked that game—the game in London—the one + where we were purposing to dine every night with one of the “three + charming ladies” who fed tea and manna and late hours to Hogg at + Bracknell. + </p> + <p> + Shelley could send Eliza away, of course; could have cleared her out long + ago if so minded, just as he had previously done with a predecessor of + hers whom he had first worshiped and then turned against; but perhaps she + was useful there as a thin excuse for staying away himself. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “I am now but little inclined to contest this point. + I certainly hate her with all my heart and soul.... + + “It is a sight which awakens an inexpressible sensation of + disgust and horror, to see her caress my poor little Ianthe, + in whom I may hereafter find the consolation of sympathy. + I sometimes feel faint with the fatigue of checking the + overflowings of my unbounded abhorrence for this miserable + wretch. But she is no more than a blind and loathsome worm, + that cannot see to sting. + + “I have begun to learn Italian again.... Cornelia + assists me in this language. Did I not once tell you that I + thought her cold and reserved? She is the reverse of this, as + she is the reverse of everything bad. She inherits all the + divinity of her mother.... I have sometimes forgotten + that I am not an inmate of this delightful home—that a time + will come which will cast me again into the boundless ocean of + abhorred society. + + “I have written nothing but one stanza, which has no meaning, + and that I have only written in thought: + + “Thy dewy looks sink in my breast; + Thy gentle words stir poison there; + Thou hast disturbed the only rest + That was the portion of despair. + Subdued to duty's hard control, + I could have borne my wayward lot: + The chains that bind this rained soul + Had cankered then, but crushed it not. + + “This is the vision of a delirious and distempered dream, which + passes away at the cold clear light of morning. Its surpassing + excellence and exquisite perfections have no more reality than + the color of an autumnal sunset.” + </pre> + <p> + Then it did not refer to his wife. That is plain; otherwise he would have + said so. It is well that he explained that it has no meaning, for if he + had not done that, the previous soft references to Cornelia and the way he + has come to feel about her now would make us think she was the person who + had inspired it while teaching him how to read the warm and ruddy Italian + poets during a month. + </p> + <p> + The biography observes that portions of this letter “read like the + tired moaning of a wounded creature.” Guesses at the nature of the + wound are permissible; we will hazard one. + </p> + <p> + Read by the light of Shelley's previous history, his letter seems to + be the cry of a tortured conscience. Until this time it was a conscience + that had never felt a pang or known a smirch. It was the conscience of one + who, until this time, had never done a dishonorable thing, or an + ungenerous, or cruel, or treacherous thing, but was now doing all of + these, and was keenly aware of it. Up to this time Shelley had been master + of his nature, and it was a nature which was as beautiful and as nearly + perfect as any merely human nature may be. But he was drunk now, with a + debasing passion, and was not himself. There is nothing in his previous + history that is in character with the Shelley of this letter. He had done + boyish things, foolish things, even crazy things, but never a thing to be + ashamed of. He had done things which one might laugh at, but the privilege + of laughing was limited always to the thing itself; you could not laugh at + the motive back of it—that was high, that was noble. His most + fantastic and quixotic acts had a purpose back of them which made them + fine, often great, and made the rising laugh seem profanation and quenched + it; quenched it, and changed the impulse to homage. + </p> + <p> + Up to this time he had been loyalty itself, where his obligations lay—treachery + was new to him; he had never done an ignoble thing—baseness was new + to him; he had never done an unkind thing—that also was new to him. + </p> + <p> + This was the author of that letter, this was the man who had deserted his + young wife and was lamenting, because he must leave another woman's + house which had become a “home” to him, and go away. Is he + lamenting mainly because he must go back to his wife and child? No, the + lament is mainly for what he is to leave behind him. The physical comforts + of the house? No, in his life he had never attached importance to such + things. Then the thing which he grieves to leave is narrowed down to a + person—to the person whose “dewy looks” had sunk into + his breast, and whose seducing words had “stirred poison there.” + </p> + <p> + He was ashamed of himself, his conscience was upbraiding him. He was the + slave of a degrading love; he was drunk with his passion, the real Shelley + was in temporary eclipse. This is the verdict which his previous history + must certainly deliver upon this episode, I think. + </p> + <p> + One must be allowed to assist himself with conjectures like these when + trying to find his way through a literary swamp which has so many + misleading finger-boards up as this book is furnished with. + </p> + <p> + We have now arrived at a part of the swamp where the difficulties and + perplexities are going to be greater than any we have yet met with—where, + indeed, the finger-boards are multitudinous, and the most of them pointing + diligently in the wrong direction. We are to be told by the biography why + Shelley deserted his wife and child and took up with Cornelia Turner and + Italian. It was not on account of Cornelia's sighs and + sentimentalities and tea and manna and late hours and soft and sweet and + industrious enticements; no, it was because “his happiness in his + home had been wounded and bruised almost to death.” + </p> + <p> + It had been wounded and bruised almost to death in this way: + </p> + <p> + 1st. Harriet persuaded him to set up a carriage. + </p> + <p> + 2d. After the intrusion of the baby, Harriet stopped reading aloud and + studying. + </p> + <p> + 3d. Harriet's walks with Hogg “commonly conducted us to some + fashionable bonnet-shop.” + </p> + <p> + 4th. Harriet hired a wet-nurse. + </p> + <p> + 5th. When an operation was being performed upon the baby, “Harriet + stood by, narrowly observing all that was done, but, to the astonishment + of the operator, betraying not the smallest sign of emotion.” + </p> + <p> + 6th. Eliza Westbrook, sister-in-law, was still of the household. + </p> + <p> + The evidence against Harriet Shelley is all in; there is no more. Upon + these six counts she stands indicted of the crime of driving her husband + into that sty at Bracknell; and this crime, by these helps, the + biographical prosecuting attorney has set himself the task of proving upon + her. + </p> + <p> + Does the biographer call himself the attorney for the prosecution? No, + only to himself, privately; publicly he is the passionless, disinterested, + impartial judge on the bench. He holds up his judicial scales before the + world, that all may see; and it all tries to look so fair that a blind + person would sometimes fail to see him slip the false weights in. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost + to death, first, because Harriet had persuaded him to set up a carriage. I + cannot discover that any evidence is offered that she asked him to set up + a carriage. Still, if she did, was it a heavy offense? Was it unique? + Other young wives had committed it before, others have committed it since. + Shelley had dearly loved her in those London days; possibly he set up the + carriage gladly to please her; affectionate young husbands do such things. + When Shelley ran away with another girl, by-and-by, this girl persuaded + him to pour the price of many carriages and many horses down the + bottomless well of her father's debts, but this impartial judge + finds no fault with that. Once she appeals to Shelley to raise money—necessarily + by borrowing, there was no other way—to pay her father's debts + with at a time when Shelley was in danger of being arrested and imprisoned + for his own debts; yet the good judge finds no fault with her even for + this. + </p> + <p> + First and last, Shelley emptied into that rapacious mendicant's lap + a sum which cost him—for he borrowed it at ruinous rates—from + eighty to one hundred thousand dollars. But it was Mary Godwin's + papa, the supplications were often sent through Mary, the good judge is + Mary's strenuous friend, so Mary gets no censures. On the Continent + Mary rode in her private carriage, built, as Shelley boasts, “by one + of the best makers in Bond Street,” yet the good judge makes not + even a passing comment on this iniquity. Let us throw out Count No. 1 + against Harriet Shelley as being far-fetched, and frivolous. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost + to death, secondly, because Harriet's studies “had dwindled + away to nothing, Bysshe had ceased to express any interest in them.” + At what time was this? It was when Harriet “had fully recovered from + the fatigue of her first effort of maternity... and was now in full force, + vigor, and effect.” Very well, the baby was born two days before the + close of June. It took the mother a month to get back her full force, + vigor, and effect; this brings us to July 27th and the deadly Cornelia. If + a wife of eighteen is studying with her husband and he gets smitten with + another woman, isn't he likely to lose interest in his wife's + studies for that reason, and is not his wife's interest in her + studies likely to languish for the same reason? Would not the mere sight + of those books of hers sharpen the pain that is in her heart? This sudden + breaking down of a mutual intellectual interest of two years' + standing is coincident with Shelley's re-encounter with Cornelia; + and we are allowed to gather from that time forth for nearly two months he + did all his studying in that person's society. We feel at liberty to + rule out Count No. 2 from the indictment against Harriet. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost + to death, thirdly, because Harriet's walks with Hogg commonly led to + some fashionable bonnet-shop. I offer no palliation; I only ask why the + dispassionate, impartial judge did not offer one himself—merely, I + mean, to offset his leniency in a similar case or two where the girl who + ran away with Harriet's husband was the shopper. There are several + occasions where she interested herself with shopping—among them + being walks which ended at the bonnet-shop—yet in none of these + cases does she get a word of blame from the good judge, while in one of + them he covers the deed with a justifying remark, she doing the shopping + that time to find easement for her mind, her child having died. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost + to death, fourthly, by the introduction there of a wet-nurse. The + wet-nurse was introduced at the time of the Edinburgh sojourn, immediately + after Shelley had been enjoying the two months of study with Cornelia + which broke up his wife's studies and destroyed his personal + interest in them. Why, by this time, nothing that Shelley's wife + could do would have been satisfactory to him, for he was in love with + another woman, and was never going to be contented again until he got back + to her. If he had been still in love with his wife it is not easily + conceivable that he would care much who nursed the baby, provided the baby + was well nursed. Harriet's jealousy was assuredly voicing itself + now, Shelley's conscience was assuredly nagging him, pestering him, + persecuting him. Shelley needed excuses for his altered attitude toward + his wife; Providence pitied him and sent the wet-nurse. If Providence had + sent him a cotton doughnut it would have answered just as well; all he + wanted was something to find fault with. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost + to death, fifthly, because Harriet narrowly watched a surgical operation + which was being performed upon her child, and, “to the astonishment + of the operator,” who was watching Harriet instead of attending to + his operation, she betrayed “not the smallest sign of emotion.” + The author of this biography was not ashamed to set down that exultant + slander. He was apparently not aware that it was a small business to bring + into his court a witness whose name he does not know, and whose character + and veracity there is none to vouch for, and allow him to strike this blow + at the mother-heart of this friendless girl. The biographer says, “We + may not infer from this that Harriet did not feel”—why put it + in, then?—“but we learn that those about her could believe her + to be hard and insensible.” Who were those who were about her? Her + husband? He hated her now, because he was in love elsewhere. Her sister? + Of course that is not charged. Peacock? Peacock does not testify. The + wet-nurse? She does not testify. If any others were there we have no + mention of them. “Those about her” are reduced to one person—her + husband. Who reports the circumstance? It is Hogg. Perhaps he was there—we + do not know. But if he was, he still got his information at second-hand, + as it was the operator who noticed Harriet's lack of emotion, not + himself. Hogg is not given to saying kind things when Harriet is his + subject. He may have said them the time that he tried to tempt her to soil + her honor, but after that he mentions her usually with a sneer. “Among + those who were about her” was one witness well equipped to silence + all tongues, abolish all doubts, set our minds at rest; one witness, not + called, and not callable, whose evidence, if we could but get it, would + outweigh the oaths of whole battalions of hostile Hoggs and nameless + surgeons—the baby. I wish we had the baby's testimony; and yet + if we had it it would not do us any good—a furtive conjecture, a sly + insinuation, a pious “if” or two, would be smuggled in, here + and there, with a solemn air of judicial investigation, and its + positiveness would wilt into dubiety. + </p> + <p> + The biographer says of Harriet, “If words of tender affection and + motherly pride proved the reality of love, then undoubtedly she loved her + firstborn child.” That is, if mere empty words can prove it, it + stands proved—and in this way, without committing himself, he gives + the reader a chance to infer that there isn't any extant evidence + but words, and that he doesn't take much stock in them. How seldom + he shows his hand! He is always lurking behind a non-committal “if” + or something of that kind; always gliding and dodging around, distributing + colorless poison here and there and everywhere, but always leaving himself + in a position to say that his language will be found innocuous if taken to + pieces and examined. He clearly exhibits a steady and never-relaxing + purpose to make Harriet the scapegoat for her husband's first great + sin—but it is in the general view that this is revealed, not in the + details. His insidious literature is like blue water; you know what it is + that makes it blue, but you cannot produce and verify any detail of the + cloud of microscopic dust in it that does it. Your adversary can dip up a + glassful and show you that it is pure white and you cannot deny it; and he + can dip the lake dry, glass by glass, and show that every glassful is + white, and prove it to any one's eye—and yet that lake was + blue and you can swear it. This book is blue—with slander in + solution. + </p> + <p> + Let the reader examine, for example, the paragraph of comment which + immediately follows the letter containing Shelley's self-exposure + which we have been considering. This is it. One should inspect the + individual sentences as they go by, then pass them in procession and + review the cake-walk as a whole: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Shelley's happiness in his home, as is evident from this + pathetic letter, had been fatally stricken; it is evident, + also, that he knew where duty lay; he felt that his part was to + take up his burden, silently and sorrowfully, and to bear it + henceforth with the quietness of despair. But we can perceive + that he scarcely possessed the strength and fortitude needful + for success in such an attempt. And clearly Shelley himself + was aware how perilous it was to accept that respite of + blissful ease which he enjoyed in the Boinville household; for + gentle voices and dewy looks and words of sympathy could not + fail to remind him of an ideal of tranquillity or of joy which + could never be his, and which he must henceforth sternly + exclude from his imagination.” + </pre> + <p> + That paragraph commits the author in no way. Taken sentence by sentence it + asserts nothing against anybody or in favor of anybody, pleads for nobody, + accuses nobody. Taken detail by detail, it is as innocent as moonshine. + And yet, taken as a whole, it is a design against the reader; its intent + is to remove the feeling which the letter must leave with him if let + alone, and put a different one in its place—to remove a feeling + justified by the letter and substitute one not justified by it. The letter + itself gives you no uncertain picture—no lecturer is needed to stand + by with a stick and point out its details and let on to explain what they + mean. The picture is the very clear and remorsefully faithful picture of a + fallen and fettered angel who is ashamed of himself; an angel who beats + his soiled wings and cries, who complains to the woman who enticed him + that he could have borne his wayward lot, he could have stood by his duty + if it had not been for her beguilements; an angel who rails at the “boundless + ocean of abhorred society,” and rages at his poor judicious + sister-in-law. If there is any dignity about this spectacle it will escape + most people. + </p> + <p> + Yet when the paragraph of comment is taken as a whole, the picture is full + of dignity and pathos; we have before us a blameless and noble spirit + stricken to the earth by malign powers, but not conquered; tempted, but + grandly putting the temptation away; enmeshed by subtle coils, but sternly + resolved to rend them and march forth victorious, at any peril of life or + limb. Curtain—slow music. + </p> + <p> + Was it the purpose of the paragraph to take the bad taste of Shelley's + letter out of the reader's mouth? If that was not it, good ink was + wasted; without that, it has no relevancy—the multiplication table + would have padded the space as rationally. + </p> + <p> + We have inspected the six reasons which we are asked to believe drove a + man of conspicuous patience, honor, justice, fairness, kindliness, and + iron firmness, resolution, and steadfastness, from the wife whom he loved + and who loved him, to a refuge in the mephitic paradise of Bracknell. + These are six infinitely little reasons; but there were six colossal ones, + and these the counsel for the destruction of Harriet Shelley persists in + not considering very important. + </p> + <p> + Moreover, the colossal six preceded the little six and had done the + mischief before they were born. Let us double-column the twelve; then we + shall see at a glance that each little reason is in turn answered by a + retorting reason of a size to overshadow it and make it insignificant: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 1. Harriet sets up carriage. 1. CORNELIA TURNER. + 2. Harriet stops studying. 2. CORNELIA TURNER. + 3. Harriet goes to bonnet-shop. 3. CORNELIA TURNER. + 4. Harriet takes a wet-nurse. 4. CORNELIA TURNER. + 5. Harriet has too much nerve. 5. CORNELIA TURNER. + 6. Detested sister-in-law 6. CORNELIA TURNER. +</pre> + <p> + As soon as we comprehend that Cornelia Turner and the Italian lessons + happened before the little six had been discovered to be grievances, we + understand why Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and + bruised almost to death, and no one can persuade us into laying it on + Harriet. Shelley and Cornelia are the responsible persons, and we cannot + in honor and decency allow the cruelties which they practised upon the + unoffending wife to be pushed aside in order to give us a chance to waste + time and tears over six sentimental justifications of an offense which the + six can't justify, nor even respectably assist in justifying. + </p> + <p> + Six? There were seven; but in charity to the biographer the seventh ought + not to be exposed. Still, he hung it out himself, and not only hung it + out, but thought it was a good point in Shelley's favor. For two + years Shelley found sympathy and intellectual food and all that at home; + there was enough for spiritual and mental support, but not enough for + luxury; and so, at the end of the contented two years, this latter detail + justifies him in going bag and baggage over to Cornelia Turner and + supplying the rest of his need in the way of surplus sympathy and + intellectual pie unlawfully. By the same reasoning a man in merely + comfortable circumstances may rob a bank without sin. + </p> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0003" id="link2H_4_0003"> + <!-- H2 anchor --> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + III + </h2> + <p> + It is 1814, it is the 16th of March, Shelley has written his letter, he + has been in the Boinville paradise a month, his deserted wife is in her + husbandless home. Mischief had been wrought. It is the biographer who + concedes this. We greatly need some light on Harriet's side of the + case now; we need to know how she enjoyed the month, but there is no way + to inform ourselves; there seems to be a strange absence of documents and + letters and diaries on that side. Shelley kept a diary, the approaching + Mary Godwin kept a diary, her father kept one, her half-sister by + marriage, adoption, and the dispensation of God kept one, and the entire + tribe and all its friends wrote and received letters, and the letters were + kept and are producible when this biography needs them; but there are only + three or four scraps of Harriet's writing, and no diary. Harriet + wrote plenty of letters to her husband—nobody knows where they are, + I suppose; she wrote plenty of letters to other people—apparently + they have disappeared, too. Peacock says she wrote good letters, but + apparently interested people had sagacity enough to mislay them in time. + After all her industry she went down into her grave and lies silent there—silent, + when she has so much need to speak. We can only wonder at this mystery, + not account for it. + </p> + <p> + No, there is no way of finding out what Harriet's state of feeling + was during the month that Shelley was disporting himself in the Bracknell + paradise. We have to fall back upon conjecture, as our fabulist does when + he has nothing more substantial to work with. Then we easily conjecture + that as the days dragged by Harriet's heart grew heavier and heavier + under its two burdens—shame and resentment: the shame of being + pointed at and gossiped about as a deserted wife, and resentment against + the woman who had beguiled her husband from her and now kept him in a + disreputable captivity. Deserted wives—deserted whether for cause or + without cause—find small charity among the virtuous and the + discreet. We conjecture that one after another the neighbors ceased to + call; that one after another they got to being “engaged” when + Harriet called; that finally they one after the other cut her dead on the + street; that after that she stayed in the house daytimes, and brooded over + her sorrows, and nighttimes did the same, there being nothing else to do + with the heavy hours and the silence and solitude and the dreary intervals + which sleep should have charitably bridged, but didn't. + </p> + <p> + Yes, mischief had been wrought. The biographer arrives at this conclusion, + and it is a most just one. Then, just as you begin to half hope he is + going to discover the cause of it and launch hot bolts of wrath at the + guilty manufacturers of it, you have to turn away disappointed. You are + disappointed, and you sigh. This is what he says —the italics [''] + are mine: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “However the mischief may have been wrought—'and at this day + no one can wish to heap blame on any buried head'—” + </pre> + <p> + So it is poor Harriet, after all. Stern justice must take its course—justice + tempered with delicacy, justice tempered with compassion, justice that + pities a forlorn dead girl and refuses to strike her. Except in the back. + Will not be ignoble and say the harsh thing, but only insinuate it. Stern + justice knows about the carriage and the wet-nurse and the bonnet-shop and + the other dark things that caused this sad mischief, and may not, must not + blink them; so it delivers judgment where judgment belongs, but softens + the blow by not seeming to deliver judgment at all. To resume—the + italics are mine: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “However the mischief may have been wrought—and at this day no + one can wish to heap blame on any buried head—'it is certain + that some cause or causes of deep division between Shelley and + his wife were in operation during the early part of the year + 1814'.” + </pre> + <p> + This shows penetration. No deduction could be more accurate than this. + There were indeed some causes of deep division. But next comes another + disappointing sentence: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “To guess at the precise nature of these causes, in the absence + of definite statement, were useless.” + </pre> + <p> + Why, he has already been guessing at them for several pages, and we have + been trying to outguess him, and now all of a sudden he is tired of it and + won't play any more. It is not quite fair to us. However, he will + get over this by-and-by, when Shelley commits his next indiscretion and + has to be guessed out of it at Harriet's expense. + </p> + <p> + “We may rest content with Shelley's own words”—in + a Chancery paper drawn up by him three years later. They were these: + “Delicacy forbids me to say more than that we were disunited by + incurable dissensions.” + </p> + <p> + As for me, I do not quite see why we should rest content with anything of + the sort. It is not a very definite statement. It does not necessarily + mean anything more than that he did not wish to go into the tedious + details of those family quarrels. Delicacy could quite properly excuse him + from saying, “I was in love with Cornelia all that time; my wife + kept crying and worrying about it and upbraiding me and begging me to cut + myself free from a connection which was wronging her and disgracing us + both; and I being stung by these reproaches retorted with fierce and + bitter speeches—for it is my nature to do that when I am stirred, + especially if the target of them is a person whom I had greatly loved and + respected before, as witness my various attitudes towards Miss Hitchener, + the Gisbornes, Harriet's sister, and others—and finally I did + not improve this state of things when I deserted my wife and spent a whole + month with the woman who had infatuated me.” + </p> + <p> + No, he could not go into those details, and we excuse him; but, + nevertheless, we do not rest content with this bland proposition to puff + away that whole long disreputable episode with a single mean, meaningless + remark of Shelley's. + </p> + <p> + We do admit that “it is certain that some cause or causes of deep + division were in operation.” We would admit it just the same if the + grammar of the statement were as straight as a string, for we drift into + pretty indifferent grammar ourselves when we are absorbed in historical + work; but we have to decline to admit that we cannot guess those cause or + causes. + </p> + <p> + But guessing is not really necessary. There is evidence attainable—evidence + from the batch discredited by the biographer and set out at the back door + in his appendix-basket; and yet a court of law would think twice before + throwing it out, whereas it would be a hardy person who would venture to + offer in such a place a good part of the material which is placed before + the readers of this book as “evidence,” and so treated by this + daring biographer. Among some letters (in the appendix-basket) from Mrs. + Godwin, detailing the Godwinian share in the Shelleyan events of 1814, she + tells how Harriet Shelley came to her and her husband, agitated and + weeping, to implore them to forbid Shelley the house, and prevent his + seeing Mary Godwin. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “She related that last November he had fallen in love with Mrs. + Turner and paid her such marked attentions Mr. Turner, the + husband, had carried off his wife to Devonshire.” + </pre> + <p> + The biographer finds a technical fault in this; “the Shelleys were + in Edinburgh in November.” What of that? The woman is recalling a + conversation which is more than two months old; besides, she was probably + more intent upon the central and important fact of it than upon its + unimportant date. Harriet's quoted statement has some sense in it; + for that reason, if for no other, it ought to have been put in the body of + the book. Still, that would not have answered; even the biographer's + enemy could not be cruel enough to ask him to let this real grievance, + this compact and substantial and picturesque figure, this + rawhead-and-bloody-bones, come striding in there among those pale shams, + those rickety specters labeled WET-NURSE, BONNET-SHOP, and so on—no, + the father of all malice could not ask the biographer to expose his + pathetic goblins to a competition like that. + </p> + <p> + The fabulist finds fault with the statement because it has a technical + error in it; and he does this at the moment that he is furnishing us an + error himself, and of a graver sort. He says: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “If Turner carried off his wife to Devonshire he brought her + back and Shelley was staying with her and her mother on terms + of cordial intimacy in March, 1814.” + </pre> + <p> + We accept the “cordial intimacy”—it was the very thing + Harriet was complaining of—but there is nothing to show that it was + Turner who brought his wife back. The statement is thrown in as if it were + not only true, but was proof that Turner was not uneasy. Turner's + movements are proof of nothing. Nothing but a statement from Turner's + mouth would have any value here, and he made none. + </p> + <p> + Six days after writing his letter Shelley and his wife were together again + for a moment—to get remarried according to the rites of the English + Church. + </p> + <p> + Within three weeks the new husband and wife were apart again, and the + former was back in his odorous paradise. This time it is the wife who does + the deserting. She finds Cornelia too strong for her, probably. At any + rate, she goes away with her baby and sister, and we have a playful fling + at her from good Mrs. Boinville, the “mysterious spinner Maimuna”; + she whose “face was as a damsel's face, and yet her hair was + gray”; she of whom the biographer has said, “Shelley was + indeed caught in an almost invisible thread spun around him, but + unconsciously, by this subtle and benignant enchantress.” The subtle + and benignant enchantress writes to Hogg, April 18: “Shelley is + again a widower; his beauteous half went to town on Thursday.” + </p> + <p> + Then Shelley writes a poem—a chant of grief over the hard fate which + obliges him now to leave his paradise and take up with his wife again. It + seems to intimate that the paradise is cooling toward him; that he is + warned off by acclamation; that he must not even venture to tempt with one + last tear his friend Cornelia's ungentle mood, for her eye is glazed + and cold and dares not entreat her lover to stay: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit E + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Pause not! the time is past! Every voice cries 'Away!' + Tempt not with one last tear thy friend's ungentle mood; + Thy lover's eye, so glazed and cold, dares not entreat thy + stay: + Duty and dereliction guide thee back to solitude.” + </pre> + <p> + Back to the solitude of his now empty home, that is! + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Away! away! to thy sad and silent home; + Pour bitter tears on its desolated hearth.” + ........ +</pre> + <p> + But he will have rest in the grave by-and-by. Until that time comes, the + charms of Bracknell will remain in his memory, along with Mrs. Boinville's + voice and Cornelia Turner's smile: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Thou in the grave shalt rest—yet, till the phantoms flee + Which that house and hearth and garden made dear to thee ere while, + Thy remembrance and repentance and deep musings are not free + From the music of two voices and the light of one sweet smile.” + </pre> + <p> + We cannot wonder that Harriet could not stand it. Any of us would have + left. We would not even stay with a cat that was in this condition. Even + the Boinvilles could not endure it; and so, as we have seen, they gave + this one notice. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Early in May, Shelley was in London. He did not yet despair + of reconciliation with Harriet, nor had he ceased to love her.” + </pre> + <p> + Shelley's poems are a good deal of trouble to his biographer. They + are constantly inserted as “evidence,” and they make much + confusion. As soon as one of them has proved one thing, another one + follows and proves quite a different thing. The poem just quoted shows + that he was in love with Cornelia, but a month later he is in love with + Harriet again, and there is a poem to prove it. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “In this piteous appeal Shelley declares that he has now no + grief but one—the grief of having known and lost his wife's + love.” + </pre> + <p> + Exhibit F + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Thy look of love has power to calm + The stormiest passion of my soul.” + </pre> + <p> + But without doubt she had been reserving her looks of love a good part of + the time for ten months, now—ever since he began to lavish his own + on Cornelia Turner at the end of the previous July. He does really seem to + have already forgotten Cornelia's merits in one brief month, for he + eulogizes Harriet in a way which rules all competition out: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Thou only virtuous, gentle, kind, + Amid a world of hate.” + </pre> + <p> + He complains of her hardness, and begs her to make the concession of a + “slight endurance”—of his waywardness, perhaps—for + the sake of “a fellow-being's lasting weal.” But the + main force of his appeal is in his closing stanza, and is strongly worded: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “O trust for once no erring guide! + Bid the remorseless feeling flee; + 'Tis malice, 'tis revenge, 'tis pride, + 'Tis anything but thee; + O deign a nobler pride to prove, + And pity if thou canst not love.” + </pre> + <p> + This is in May—apparently towards the end of it. Harriet and Shelley + were corresponding all the time. Harriet got the poem—a copy exists + in her own handwriting; she being the only gentle and kind person amid a + world of hate, according to Shelley's own testimony in the poem, we + are permitted to think that the daily letters would presently have melted + that kind and gentle heart and brought about the reconciliation, if there + had been time but there wasn't; for in a very few days—in + fact, before the 8th of June—Shelley was in love with another woman. + </p> + <p> + And so—perhaps while Harriet was walking the floor nights, trying to + get her poem by heart—her husband was doing a fresh one—for + the other girl—Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin—with sentiments like + these in it: + </p> + <p> + Exhibit G + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + To spend years thus and be rewarded, + As thou, sweet love, requited me + When none were near. + ... thy lips did meet + Mine tremblingly;... + + “Gentle and good and mild thou art, + Nor can I live if thou appear + Aught but thyself.”... +</pre> + <p> + And so on. “Before the close of June it was known and felt by Mary + and Shelley that each was inexpressibly dear to the other.” Yes, + Shelley had found this child of sixteen to his liking, and had wooed and + won her in the graveyard. But that is nothing; it was better than wooing + her in her nursery, at any rate, where it might have disturbed the other + children. + </p> + <p> + However, she was a child in years only. From the day that she set her + masculine grip on Shelley he was to frisk no more. If she had occupied the + only kind and gentle Harriet's place in March it would have been a + thrilling spectacle to see her invade the Boinville rookery and read the + riot act. That holiday of Shelley's would have been of short + duration, and Cornelia's hair would have been as gray as her mother's + when the services were over. + </p> + <p> + Hogg went to the Godwin residence in Skinner Street with Shelley on that + 8th of June. They passed through Godwin's little debt-factory of a + book-shop and went up-stairs hunting for the proprietor. Nobody there. + Shelley strode about the room impatiently, making its crazy floor quake + under him. Then a door “was partially and softly opened. A thrilling + voice called 'Shelley!' A thrilling voice answered, 'Mary!' + And he darted out of the room like an arrow from the bow of the + far-shooting King. A very young female, fair and fair-haired, pale, + indeed, and with a piercing look, wearing a frock of tartan, an unusual + dress in London at that time, had called him out of the room.” + </p> + <p> + This is Mary Godwin, as described by Hogg. The thrill of the voices shows + that the love of Shelley and Mary was already upward of a fortnight old; + therefore it had been born within the month of May—born while + Harriet was still trying to get her poem by heart, we think. I must not be + asked how I know so much about that thrill; it is my secret. The + biographer and I have private ways of finding out things when it is + necessary to find them out and the customary methods fail. + </p> + <p> + Shelley left London that day, and was gone ten days. The biographer + conjectures that he spent this interval with Harriet in Bath. It would be + just like him. To the end of his days he liked to be in love with two + women at once. He was more in love with Miss Hitchener when he married + Harriet than he was with Harriet, and told the lady so with simple and + unostentatious candor. He was more in love with Cornelia than he was with + Harriet in the end of 1813 and the beginning of 1814, yet he supplied both + of them with love poems of an equal temperature meantime; he loved Mary + and Harriet in June, and while getting ready to run off with the one, it + is conjectured that he put in his odd time trying to get reconciled to the + other; by-and-by, while still in love with Mary, he will make love to her + half-sister by marriage, adoption, and the visitation of God, through the + medium of clandestine letters, and she will answer with letters that are + for no eye but his own. + </p> + <p> + When Shelley encountered Mary Godwin he was looking around for another + paradise. He had tastes of his own, and there were features about the + Godwin establishment that strongly recommended it. Godwin was an advanced + thinker and an able writer. One of his romances is still read, but his + philosophical works, once so esteemed, are out of vogue now; their + authority was already declining when Shelley made his acquaintance —that + is, it was declining with the public, but not with Shelley. They had been + his moral and political Bible, and they were that yet. Shelley the infidel + would himself have claimed to be less a work of God than a work of Godwin. + Godwin's philosophies had formed his mind and interwoven themselves + into it and become a part of its texture; he regarded himself as Godwin's + spiritual son. Godwin was not without self-appreciation; indeed, it may be + conjectured that from his point of view the last syllable of his name was + surplusage. He lived serene in his lofty world of philosophy, far above + the mean interests that absorbed smaller men, and only came down to the + ground at intervals to pass the hat for alms to pay his debts with, and + insult the man that relieved him. Several of his principles were out of + the ordinary. For example, he was opposed to marriage. He was not aware + that his preachings from this text were but theory and wind; he supposed + he was in earnest in imploring people to live together without marrying, + until Shelley furnished him a working model of his scheme and a practical + example to analyze, by applying the principle in his own family; the + matter took a different and surprising aspect then. The late Matthew + Arnold said that the main defect in Shelley's make-up was that he + was destitute of the sense of humor. This episode must have escaped Mr. + Arnold's attention. + </p> + <p> + But we have said enough about the head of the new paradise. Mrs. Godwin is + described as being in several ways a terror; and even when her soul was in + repose she wore green spectacles. But I suspect that her main + unattractiveness was born of the fact that she wrote the letters that are + out in the appendix-basket in the back yard—letters which are an + outrage and wholly untrustworthy, for they say some kind things about poor + Harriet and tell some disagreeable truths about her husband; and these + things make the fabulist grit his teeth a good deal. + </p> + <p> + Next we have Fanny Godwin—a Godwin by courtesy only; she was Mrs. + Godwin's natural daughter by a former friend. She was a sweet and + winning girl, but she presently wearied of the Godwin paradise, and + poisoned herself. + </p> + <p> + Last in the list is Jane (or Claire, as she preferred to call herself) + Clairmont, daughter of Mrs. Godwin by a former marriage. She was very + young and pretty and accommodating, and always ready to do what she could + to make things pleasant. After Shelley ran off with her part-sister Mary, + she became the guest of the pair, and contributed a natural child to their + nursery—Allegra. Lord Byron was the father. + </p> + <p> + We have named the several members and advantages of the new paradise in + Skinner Street, with its crazy book-shop underneath. Shelley was all right + now, this was a better place than the other; more variety anyway, and more + different kinds of fragrance. One could turn out poetry here without any + trouble at all. + </p> + <p> + The way the new love-match came about was this: + </p> + <p> + Shelley told Mary all his aggravations and sorrows and griefs, and about + the wet-nurse and the bonnetshop and the surgeon and the carriage, and the + sister-in-law that blocked the London game, and about Cornelia and her + mamma, and how they had turned him out of the house after making so much + of him; and how he had deserted Harriet and then Harriet had deserted him, + and how the reconciliation was working along and Harriet getting her poem + by heart; and still he was not happy, and Mary pitied him, for she had had + trouble herself. But I am not satisfied with this. It reads too much like + statistics. It lacks smoothness and grace, and is too earthy and + business-like. It has the sordid look of a trades-union procession out on + strike. That is not the right form for it. The book does it better; we + will fall back on the book and have a cake-walk: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “It was easy to divine that some restless grief possessed him; + Mary herself was not unlearned in the lore of pain. His + generous zeal in her father's behalf, his spiritual sonship to + Godwin, his reverence for her mother's memory, were guarantees + with Mary of his excellence.—[What she was after was + guarantees of his excellence. That he stood ready to desert + his wife and child was one of them, apparently.]—The new + friends could not lack subjects of discourse, and underneath + their words about Mary's mother, and 'Political Justice,' and + 'Rights of Woman,' were two young hearts, each feeling towards + the other, each perhaps unaware, trembling in the direction of + the other. The desire to assuage the suffering of one whose + happiness has grown precious to us may become a hunger of the + spirit as keen as any other, and this hunger now possessed + Mary's heart; when her eyes rested unseen on Shelley, it was + with a look full of the ardor of a 'soothing pity.'” + </pre> + <p> + Yes, that is better and has more composure. That is just the way it + happened. He told her about the wet-nurse, she told him about political + justice; he told her about the deadly sister-in-law, she told him about + her mother; he told her about the bonnet-shop, she murmured back about the + rights of woman; then he assuaged her, then she assuaged him; then he + assuaged her some more, next she assuaged him some more; then they both + assuaged one another simultaneously; and so they went on by the hour + assuaging and assuaging and assuaging, until at last what was the result? + They were in love. It will happen so every time. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “He had married a woman who, as he now persuaded himself, had + never truly loved him, who loved only his fortune and his rank, + and who proved her selfishness by deserting him in his misery.” + </pre> + <p> + I think that that is not quite fair to Harriet. We have no certainty that + she knew Cornelia had turned him out of the house. He went back to + Cornelia, and Harriet may have supposed that he was as happy with her as + ever. Still, it was judicious to begin to lay on the whitewash, for + Shelley is going to need many a coat of it now, and the sooner the reader + becomes used to the intrusion of the brush the sooner he will get + reconciled to it and stop fretting about it. + </p> + <p> + After Shelley's (conjectured) visit to Harriet at Bath—8th of + June to 18th—“it seems to have been arranged that Shelley + should henceforth join the Skinner Street household each day at dinner.” + </p> + <p> + Nothing could be handier than this; things will swim along now. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Although now Shelley was coming to believe that his wedded + union with Harriet was a thing of the past, he had not ceased + to regard her with affectionate consideration; he wrote to her + frequently, and kept her informed of his whereabouts.” + </pre> + <p> + We must not get impatient over these curious inharmoniousnesses and + irreconcilabilities in Shelley's character. You can see by the + biographer's attitude towards them that there is nothing + objectionable about them. Shelley was doing his best to make two adoring + young creatures happy: he was regarding the one with affectionate + consideration by mail, and he was assuaging the other one at home. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Unhappy Harriet, residing at Bath, had perhaps never desired + that the breach between herself and her husband should be + irreparable and complete.” + </pre> + <p> + I find no fault with that sentence except that the “perhaps” + is not strictly warranted. It should have been left out. In support—or + shall we say extenuation?—of this opinion I submit that there is not + sufficient evidence to warrant the uncertainty which it implies. The only + “evidence” offered that Harriet was hard and proud and + standing out against a reconciliation is a poem—the poem in which + Shelley beseeches her to “bid the remorseless feeling flee” + and “pity” if she “cannot love.” We have just that + as “evidence,” and out of its meagre materials the biographer + builds a cobhouse of conjectures as big as the Coliseum; conjectures which + convince him, the prosecuting attorney, but ought to fall far short of + convincing any fair-minded jury. + </p> + <p> + Shelley's love-poems may be very good evidence, but we know well + that they are “good for this day and train only.” We are able + to believe that they spoke the truth for that one day, but we know by + experience that they could not be depended on to speak it the next. The + very supplication for a rewarming of Harriet's chilled love was + followed so suddenly by the poet's plunge into an adoring passion + for Mary Godwin that if it had been a check it would have lost its value + before a lazy person could have gotten to the bank with it. + </p> + <p> + Hardness, stubbornness, pride, vindictiveness—these may sometimes + reside in a young wife and mother of nineteen, but they are not charged + against Harriet Shelley outside of that poem, and one has no right to + insert them into her character on such shadowy “evidence” as + that. Peacock knew Harriet well, and she has a flexible and persuadable + look, as painted by him: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Her manners were good, and her whole aspect and demeanor such + manifest emanations of pure and truthful nature that to be once + in her company was to know her thoroughly. She was fond of her + husband, and accommodated herself in every way to his tastes. + If they mixed in society, she adorned it; if they lived in + retirement, she was satisfied; if they travelled, she enjoyed + the change of scene.” + </pre> + <p> + “Perhaps” she had never desired that the breach should be + irreparable and complete. The truth is, we do not even know that there was + any breach at all at this time. We know that the husband and wife went + before the altar and took a new oath on the 24th of March to love and + cherish each other until death—and this may be regarded as a sort of + reconciliation itself, and a wiping out of the old grudges. Then Harriet + went away, and the sister-in-law removed herself from her society. That + was in April. Shelley wrote his “appeal” in May, but the + corresponding went right along afterwards. We have a right to doubt that + the subject of it was a “reconciliation,” or that Harriet had + any suspicion that she needed to be reconciled and that her husband was + trying to persuade her to it—as the biographer has sought to make us + believe, with his Coliseum of conjectures built out of a waste-basket of + poetry. For we have “evidence” now—not poetry and + conjecture. When Shelley had been dining daily in the Skinner Street + paradise fifteen days and continuing the love-match which was already a + fortnight old twenty-five days earlier, he forgot to write Harriet; forgot + it the next day and the next. During four days Harriet got no letter from + him. Then her fright and anxiety rose to expression-heat, and she wrote a + letter to Shelley's publisher which seems to reveal to us that + Shelley's letters to her had been the customary affectionate letters + of husband to wife, and had carried no appeals for reconciliation and had + not needed to: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “BATH (postmark July 7, 1814). + + “MY DEAR SIR,—You will greatly oblige me by giving the + enclosed to Mr. Shelley. I would not trouble you, but it is + now four days since I have heard from him, which to me is an + age. Will you write by return of post and tell me what has + become of him? as I always fancy something dreadful has + happened if I do not hear from him. If you tell me that he is + well I shall not come to London, but if I do not hear from you + or him I shall certainly come, as I cannot endure this dreadful + state of suspense. You are his friend and you can feel for me. + + “I remain yours truly, + + “H. S.” + </pre> + <p> + Even without Peacock's testimony that “her whole aspect and + demeanor were manifest emanations of a pure and truthful nature,” we + should hold this to be a truthful letter, a sincere letter, a loving + letter; it bears those marks; I think it is also the letter of a person + accustomed to receiving letters from her husband frequently, and that they + have been of a welcome and satisfactory sort, too, this long time back—ever + since the solemn remarriage and reconciliation at the altar most likely. + </p> + <p> + The biographer follows Harriet's letter with a conjecture. He + conjectures that she “would now gladly have retraced her steps.” + Which means that it is proven that she had steps to retrace—proven + by the poem. Well, if the poem is better evidence than the letter, we must + let it stand at that. + </p> + <p> + Then the biographer attacks Harriet Shelley's honor—by + authority of random and unverified gossip scavengered from a group of + people whose very names make a person shudder: Mary Godwin, mistress to + Shelley; her part-sister, discarded mistress of Lord Byron; Godwin, the + philosophical tramp, who gathers his share of it from a shadow—that + is to say, from a person whom he shirks out of naming. Yet the biographer + dignifies this sorry rubbish with the name of “evidence.” + </p> + <p> + Nothing remotely resembling a distinct charge from a named person + professing to know is offered among this precious “evidence.” + </p> + <p> + 1. “Shelley believed” so and so. + </p> + <p> + 2. Byron's discarded mistress says that Shelley told Mary Godwin so + and so, and Mary told her. + </p> + <p> + 3. “Shelley said” so and so—and later “admitted + over and over again that he had been in error.” + </p> + <p> + 4. The unspeakable Godwin “wrote to Mr. Baxter” that he knew + so and so “from unquestionable authority”—name not + furnished. + </p> + <p> + How any man in his right mind could bring himself to defile the grave of a + shamefully abused and defenseless girl with these baseless fabrications, + this manufactured filth, is inconceivable. How any man, in his right mind + or out of it, could sit down and coldly try to persuade anybody to believe + it, or listen patiently to it, or, indeed, do anything but scoff at it and + deride it, is astonishing. + </p> + <p> + The charge insinuated by these odious slanders is one of the most + difficult of all offenses to prove; it is also one which no man has a + right to mention even in a whisper about any woman, living or dead, unless + he knows it to be true, and not even then unless he can also prove it to + be true. There is no justification for the abomination of putting this + stuff in the book. + </p> + <p> + Against Harriet Shelley's good name there is not one scrap of + tarnishing evidence, and not even a scrap of evil gossip, that comes from + a source that entitles it to a hearing. + </p> + <p> + On the credit side of the account we have strong opinions from the people + who knew her best. Peacock says: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “I feel it due to the memory of Harriet to state my most + decided conviction that her conduct as a wife was as pure, as + true, as absolutely faultless, as that of any who for such + conduct are held most in honor.” + </pre> + <p> + Thornton Hunt, who had picked and published slight flaws in Harriet's + character, says, as regards this alleged large one: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “There is not a trace of evidence or a whisper of scandal + against her before her voluntary departure from Shelley.” + </pre> + <p> + Trelawney says: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “I was assured by the evidence of the few friends who knew both + Shelley and his wife—Hookham, Hogg, Peacock, and one of the + Godwins—that Harriet was perfectly innocent of all offense.” + </pre> + <p> + What excuse was there for raking up a parcel of foul rumors from malicious + and discredited sources and flinging them at this dead girl's head? + Her very defenselessness should have been her protection. The fact that + all letters to her or about her, with almost every scrap of her own + writing, had been diligently mislaid, leaving her case destitute of a + voice, while every pen-stroke which could help her husband's side + had been as diligently preserved, should have excused her from being + brought to trial. Her witnesses have all disappeared, yet we see her + summoned in her grave-clothes to plead for the life of her character, + without the help of an advocate, before a disqualified judge and a packed + jury. + </p> + <p> + Harriet Shelley wrote her distressed letter on the 7th of July. On the + 28th her husband ran away with Mary Godwin and her part-sister Claire to + the Continent. He deserted his wife when her confinement was approaching. + She bore him a child at the end of November, his mistress bore him another + one something over two months later. The truants were back in London + before either of these events occurred. + </p> + <p> + On one occasion, presently, Shelley was so pressed for money to support + his mistress with that he went to his wife and got some money of his that + was in her hands—twenty pounds. Yet the mistress was not moved to + gratitude; for later, when the wife was troubled to meet her engagements, + the mistress makes this entry in her diary: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “Harriet sends her creditors here; nasty woman. Now we shall + have to change our lodgings.” + </pre> + <p> + The deserted wife bore the bitterness and obloquy of her situation two + years and a quarter; then she gave up, and drowned herself. A month + afterwards the body was found in the water. Three weeks later Shelley + married his mistress. + </p> + <p> + I must here be allowed to italicize a remark of the biographer's + concerning Harriet Shelley: + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + “That no act of Shelley's during the two years which + immediately preceded her death tended to cause the rash act + which brought her life to its close seems certain.” + </pre> + <p> + Yet her husband had deserted her and her children, and was living with a + concubine all that time! Why should a person attempt to write biography + when the simplest facts have no meaning to him? This book is littered with + as crass stupidities as that one—deductions by the page which bear + no discoverable kinship to their premises. + </p> + <p> + The biographer throws off that extraordinary remark without any + perceptible disturbance to his serenity; for he follows it with a + sentimental justification of Shelley's conduct which has not a pang + of conscience in it, but is silky and smooth and undulating and pious—a + cake-walk with all the colored brethren at their best. There may be people + who can read that page and keep their temper, but it is doubtful. Shelley's + life has the one indelible blot upon it, but is otherwise worshipfully + noble and beautiful. It even stands out indestructibly gracious and lovely + from the ruck of these disastrous pages, in spite of the fact that they + expose and establish his responsibility for his forsaken wife's + pitiful fate—a responsibility which he himself tacitly admits in a + letter to Eliza Westbrook, wherein he refers to his taking up with Mary + Godwin as an act which Eliza “might excusably regard as the cause of + her sister's ruin.” + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of In Defense of Harriet Shelley by +Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY*** + +***** This file should be named 3171-h.htm or 3171-h.zip ***** This and all +associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/7/3171/ + +Produced by David Widger + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will be +renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no one +owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and +you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission +and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in +the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and +distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the +PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a +registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, +unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge anything +for copies of this eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You +may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative +works, reports, performances and research. They may be modified and +printed and given away--you may do practically ANYTHING with public +domain eBooks. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, +especially commercial redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU +DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree +to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the +terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all +copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used +on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree +to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that +you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works even without +complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C +below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help +preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. +See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” + or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in +the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you +are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent +you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating +derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project +Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the +Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic +works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with +the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name +associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this +agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached +full Project Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with +others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing +or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project +Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost +no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use +it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this +eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with +the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, +you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through +1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute +this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other +than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain +Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full +Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access +to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.” + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free +distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth +in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from both the +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael Hart, the +owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as +set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm collection. +Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, and the +medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but +not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription +errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a +defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right +of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. +YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, +BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN +PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND +ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR +ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES +EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect +in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written +explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received +the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your +written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the +defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, +the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will remain +freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and +permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. To +learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and +how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the +Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state +of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue +Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification number +is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, +email business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official page +at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide spread +public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing +the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely +distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest array +of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to +$5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with +the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state +visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any +statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside +the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways +including including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. unless +a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks +in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, including +how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to +our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +</pre> + <p> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </p> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..594cb08 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #3171 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3171) diff --git a/old/mtdhs10.txt b/old/mtdhs10.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..164cc5f --- /dev/null +++ b/old/mtdhs10.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2025 @@ +Project Gutenberg Etext of Defence of Harriet Shelley, by Twain +by Mark Twain, #32 in our series by Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check +the laws for your country before redistributing these files!!! + +Please take a look at the important information in this header. +We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an +electronic path open for the next readers. + +Please do not remove this. + +This should be the first thing seen when anyone opens the book. +Do not change or edit it without written permission. The words +are carefully chosen to provide users with the information they +need about what they can legally do with the texts. + + +**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** + +**Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** + +*These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations* + +Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and +further information is included below. We need your donations. +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a 501(c)(3) +organization with EIN [Employee Identification Number] 64-6221541 + +As of 12/12/00 contributions are only being solicited from people in: +Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, +Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Montana, +Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, +Texas, Vermont, and Wyoming. + +As the requirements for other states are met, +additions to this list will be made and fund raising +will begin in the additional states. Please feel +free to ask to check the status of your state. + +International donations are accepted, +but we don't know ANYTHING about how +to make them tax-deductible, or +even if they CAN be made deductible, +and don't have the staff to handle it +even if there are ways. + +These donations should be made to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 + + +Title: Defence of Harriet Shelley + +Author: Mark Twain + +Release Date: April, 2002 [Etext #3171] +[Yes, we are about one year ahead of schedule] +[The actual date this file first posted = 02/08/01] + +Edition: 10 + +Language: English + +Project Gutenberg Etext of Defence of Harriet Shelley, by Twain +*****This file should be named mtdhs10.txt or mtdhs10.zip****** + +Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, mtdhs11.txt +VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, mtdhs10a.txt + +This etext was produced by David Widger <widger@cecomet.net> + +Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions, +all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a +copyright notice is included. Therefore, we usually do NOT keep any +of these books in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +We are now trying to release all our books one year in advance +of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. +Please be encouraged to send us error messages even years after +the official publication date. + +Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till +midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. +The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at +Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A +preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment +and editing by those who wish to do so. + +Most people start at our sites at: +http://gutenberg.net +http://promo.net/pg + + +Those of you who want to download any Etext before announcement +can surf to them as follows, and just download by date; this is +also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the +indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an +announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter. + +http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext02 +or +ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext02 + +Or /etext01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90 + +Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want, +as it appears in our Newsletters. + + +Information about Project Gutenberg (one page) + +We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The +time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours +to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright +searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This +projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value +per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2 +million dollars per hour this year as we release fifty new Etext +files per month, or 500 more Etexts in 2000 for a total of 3000+ +If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total +should reach over 300 billion Etexts given away by year's end. + +The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext +Files by December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000 = 1 Trillion] +This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, +which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users. + +At our revised rates of production, we will reach only one-third +of that goal by the end of 2001, or about 3,333 Etexts unless we +manage to get some real funding. + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created +to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +Presently, contributions are only being solicited from people in: +Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, +Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Montana, +Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, +Texas, Vermont, and Wyoming. + +As the requirements for other states are met, +additions to this list will be made and fund raising +will begin in the additional states. + +These donations should be made to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 + + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, +EIN [Employee Identification Number] 64-6221541, +has been approved as a 501(c)(3) organization by the US Internal +Revenue Service (IRS). Donations are tax-deductible to the extent +permitted by law. As the requirements for other states are met, +additions to this list will be made and fund raising will begin in the +additional states. + +All donations should be made to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation. Mail to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Avenue +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 [USA] + + +We need your donations more than ever! + +You can get up to date donation information at: + +http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html + + +*** + +If you can't reach Project Gutenberg, +you can always email directly to: + +Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com> + +hart@pobox.com forwards to hart@prairienet.org and archive.org +if your mail bounces from archive.org, I will still see it, if +it bounces from prairienet.org, better resend later on. . . . + +Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message. + +We would prefer to send you information by email. + + +*** + + +Example command-line FTP session: + +ftp ftp.ibiblio.org +login: anonymous +password: your@login +cd pub/docs/books/gutenberg +cd etext90 through etext99 or etext00 through etext02, etc. +dir [to see files] +get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files] +GET GUTINDEX.?? [to get a year's listing of books, e.g., GUTINDEX.99] +GET GUTINDEX.ALL [to get a listing of ALL books] + + +**The Legal Small Print** + + +(Three Pages) + +***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START*** +Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers. +They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with +your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from +someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our +fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement +disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how +you may distribute copies of this etext if you want to. + +*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT +By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept +this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by +sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person +you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical +medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request. + +ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS +This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etexts, +is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart +through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project"). +Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright +on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and +distribute it in the United States without permission and +without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth +below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext +under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark. + +Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market +any commercial products without permission. + +To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable +efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain +works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any +medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other +things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged +disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES +But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below, +[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may +receive this etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims +all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including +legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR +UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, +INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE +OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE +POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. + +If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of +receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) +you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that +time to the person you received it from. If you received it +on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and +such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement +copy. If you received it electronically, such person may +choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to +receive it electronically. + +THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS +TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A +PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or +the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the +above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you +may have other legal rights. + +INDEMNITY +You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation, +and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated +with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including +legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the +following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this etext, +[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the etext, +or [3] any Defect. + +DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm" +You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by +disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this +"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg, +or: + +[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this + requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the + etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however, + if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable + binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, + including any form resulting from conversion by word + processing or hypertext software, but only so long as + *EITHER*: + + [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and + does *not* contain characters other than those + intended by the author of the work, although tilde + (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may + be used to convey punctuation intended by the + author, and additional characters may be used to + indicate hypertext links; OR + + [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at + no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent + form by the program that displays the etext (as is + the case, for instance, with most word processors); + OR + + [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at + no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the + etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC + or other equivalent proprietary form). + +[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this + "Small Print!" statement. + +[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the + gross profits you derive calculated using the method you + already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you + don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are + payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation" + the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were + legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent + periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to + let us know your plans and to work out the details. + +WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO? +Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of +public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed +in machine readable form. + +The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time, +public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses. +Money should be paid to the: +"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or +software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at: +hart@pobox.com + +*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.12.12.00*END* + + + + + +This etext was produced by David Widger <widger@cecomet.net> + + + + + +In Defence of Harriet Shelley + +by Mark Twain + + + + +I + +I have committed sins, of course; but I have not committed enough of them +to entitle me to the punishment of reduction to the bread and water of +ordinary literature during six years when I might have been living on the +fat diet spread for the righteous in Professor Dowden's Life of Shelley, +if I had been justly dealt with. + +During these six years I have been living a life of peaceful ignorance. +I was not aware that Shelley's first wife was unfaithful to him, and that +that was why he deserted her and wiped the stain from his sensitive honor +by entering into soiled relations with Godwin's young daughter. This was +all new to me when I heard it lately, and was told that the proofs of it +were in this book, and that this book's verdict is accepted in the girls' +colleges of America and its view taught in their literary classes. + +In each of these six years multitudes of young people in our country have +arrived at the Shelley-reading age. Are these six multitudes +unacquainted with this life of Shelley? Perhaps they are; indeed, one +may feel pretty sure that the great bulk of them are. To these, then, I +address myself, in the hope that some account of this romantic historical +fable and the fabulist's manner of constructing and adorning it may +interest them. + +First, as to its literary style. Our negroes in America have several +ways of entertaining themselves which are not found among the whites +anywhere. Among these inventions of theirs is one which is particularly +popular with them. It is a competition in elegant deportment. They hire +a hall and bank the spectators' seats in rising tiers along the two +sides, leaving all the middle stretch of the floor free. A cake is +provided as a prize for the winner in the competition, and a bench of +experts in deportment is appointed to award it. Sometimes there are as +many as fifty contestants, male and female, and five hundred spectators. +One at a time the contestants enter, clothed regardless of expense in +what each considers the perfection of style and taste, and walk down the +vacant central space and back again with that multitude of critical eyes +on them. All that the competitor knows of fine airs and graces he throws +into his carriage, all that he knows of seductive expression he throws +into his countenance. He may use all the helps he can devise: watch- +chain to twirl with his fingers, cane to do graceful things with, snowy +handkerchief to flourish and get artful effects out of, shiny new +stovepipe hat to assist in his courtly bows; and the colored lady may +have a fan to work up her effects with, and smile over and blush behind, +and she may add other helps, according to her judgment. When the review +by individual detail is over, a grand review of all the contestants in +procession follows, with all the airs and graces and all the bowings and +smirkings on exhibition at once, and this enables the bench of experts to +make the necessary comparisons and arrive at a verdict. The successful +competitor gets the prize which I have before mentioned, and an abundance +of applause and envy along with it. The negroes have a name for this +grave deportment-tournament; a name taken from the prize contended for. +They call it a Cakewalk. + +This Shelley biography is a literary cake-walk. The ordinary forms of +speech are absent from it. All the pages, all the paragraphs, walk by +sedately, elegantly, not to say mincingly, in their Sunday-best, shiny +and sleek, perfumed, and with boutonnieres in their button-holes; it is +rare to find even a chance sentence that has forgotten to dress. If the +book wishes to tell us that Mary Godwin, child of sixteen, had known +afflictions, the fact saunters forth in this nobby outfit: "Mary was +herself not unlearned in the lore of pain"--meaning by that that she had +not always traveled on asphalt; or, as some authorities would frame it, +that she had "been there herself," a form which, while preferable to the +book's form, is still not to be recommended. If the book wishes to tell +us that Harriet Shelley hired a wet-nurse, that commonplace fact gets +turned into a dancing-master, who does his professional bow before us in +pumps and knee-breeches, with his fiddle under one arm and his crush-hat +under the other, thus: "The beauty of Harriet's motherly relation to her +babe was marred in Shelley's eyes by the introduction into his house of a +hireling nurse to whom was delegated the mother's tenderest office." + +This is perhaps the strangest book that has seen the light since +Frankenstein. Indeed, it is a Frankenstein itself; a Frankenstein with +the original infirmity supplemented by a new one; a Frankenstein with the +reasoning faculty wanting. Yet it believes it can reason, and is always +trying. It is not content to leave a mountain of fact standing in the +clear sunshine, where the simplest reader can perceive its form, its +details, and its relation to the rest of the landscape, but thinks it +must help him examine it and understand it; so its drifting mind settles +upon it with that intent, but always with one and the same result: there +is a change of temperature and the mountain is hid in a fog. Every time +it sets up a premise and starts to reason from it, there is a surprise in +store for the reader. It is strangely nearsighted, cross-eyed, and +purblind. Sometimes when a mastodon walks across the field of its vision +it takes it for a rat; at other times it does not see it at all. + +The materials of this biographical fable are facts, rumors, and poetry. +They are connected together and harmonized by the help of suggestion, +conjecture, innuendo, perversion, and semi-suppression. + +The fable has a distinct object in view, but this object is not +acknowledged in set words. Percy Bysshe Shelley has done something which +in the case of other men is called a grave crime; it must be shown that +in his case it is not that, because he does not think as other men do +about these things. + +Ought not that to be enough, if the fabulist is serious? Having proved +that a crime is not a crime, was it worth while to go on and fasten the +responsibility of a crime which was not a crime upon somebody else? What +is the use of hunting down and holding to bitter account people who are +responsible for other people's innocent acts? + +Still, the fabulist thinks it a good idea to do that. In his view +Shelley's first wife, Harriet, free of all offense as far as we have +historical facts for guidance, must be held unforgivably responsible for +her husband's innocent act in deserting her and taking up with another +woman. + +Any one will suspect that this task has its difficulties. Any one will +divine that nice work is necessary here, cautious work, wily work, and +that there is entertainment to be had in watching the magician do it. +There is indeed entertainment in watching him. He arranges his facts, +his rumors, and his poems on his table in full view of the house, and +shows you that everything is there--no deception, everything fair and +above board. And this is apparently true, yet there is a defect, for +some of his best stock is hid in an appendix-basket behind the door, and +you do not come upon it until the exhibition is over and the enchantment +of your mind accomplished--as the magician thinks. + +There is an insistent atmosphere of candor and fairness about this book +which is engaging at first, then a little burdensome, then a trifle +fatiguing, then progressively suspicious, annoying, irritating, and +oppressive. It takes one some little time to find out that phrases which +seem intended to guide the reader aright are there to mislead him; that +phrases which seem intended to throw light are there to throw darkness; +that phrases which seem intended to interpret a fact are there to +misinterpret it; that phrases which seem intended to forestall prejudice +are there to create it; that phrases which seem antidotes are poisons in +disguise. The naked facts arrayed in the book establish Shelley's guilt +in that one episode which disfigures his otherwise superlatively lofty +and beautiful life; but the historian's careful and methodical +misinterpretation of them transfers the responsibility to the wife's +shoulders as he persuades himself. The few meagre facts of Harriet +Shelley's life, as furnished by the book, acquit her of offense; but by +calling in the forbidden helps of rumor, gossip, conjecture, insinuation, +and innuendo he destroys her character and rehabilitates Shelley's--as he +believes. And in truth his unheroic work has not been barren of the +results he aimed at; as witness the assertion made to me that girls in +the colleges of America are taught that Harriet Shelley put a stain upon +her husband's honor, and that that was what stung him into repurifying +himself by deserting her and his child and entering into scandalous +relations with a school-girl acquaintance of his. + +If that assertion is true, they probably use a reduction of this work in +those colleges, maybe only a sketch outlined from it. Such a thing as +that could be harmful and misleading. They ought to cast it out and put +the whole book in its place. It would not deceive. It would not deceive +the janitor. + +All of this book is interesting on account of the sorcerer's methods and +the attractiveness of some of his characters and the repulsiveness of the +rest, but no part of it is so much so as are the chapters wherein he +tries to think he thinks he sets forth the causes which led to Shelley's +desertion of his wife in 1814. + +Harriet Westbrook was a school-girl sixteen years old. Shelley was +teeming with advanced thought. He believed that Christianity was a +degrading and selfish superstition, and he had a deep and sincere desire +to rescue one of his sisters from it. Harriet was impressed by his +various philosophies and looked upon him as an intellectual wonder-- +which indeed he was. He had an idea that she could give him valuable +help in his scheme regarding his sister; therefore he asked her to +correspond with him. She was quite willing. Shelley was not thinking of +love, for he was just getting over a passion for his cousin, Harriet +Grove, and just getting well steeped in one for Miss Hitchener, a school- +teacher. What might happen to Harriet Westbrook before the letter- +writing was ended did not enter his mind. Yet an older person could have +made a good guess at it, for in person Shelley was as beautiful as an +angel, he was frank, sweet, winning, unassuming, and so rich in +unselfishness, generosities, and magnanimities that he made his whole +generation seem poor in these great qualities by comparison. Besides, +he was in distress. His college had expelled him for writing an +atheistical pamphlet and afflicting the reverend heads of the university +with it, his rich father and grandfather had closed their purses against +him, his friends were cold. Necessarily, Harriet fell in love with him; +and so deeply, indeed, that there was no way for Shelley to save her from +suicide but to marry her. He believed himself to blame for this state of +things, so the marriage took place. He was pretty fairly in love with +Harriet, although he loved Miss Hitchener better. He wrote and explained +the case to Miss Hitchener after the wedding, and he could not have been +franker or more naive and less stirred up about the circumstance if the +matter in issue had been a commercial transaction involving thirty-five +dollars. + +Shelley was nineteen. He was not a youth, but a man. He had never had +any youth. He was an erratic and fantastic child during eighteen years, +then he stepped into manhood, as one steps over a door-sill. He was +curiously mature at nineteen in his ability to do independent thinking +on the deep questions of life and to arrive at sharply definite decisions +regarding them, and stick to them--stick to them and stand by them at +cost of bread, friendships, esteem, respect, and approbation. + +For the sake of his opinions he was willing to sacrifice all these +valuable things, and did sacrifice them; and went on doing it, too, when +he could at any moment have made himself rich and supplied himself with +friends and esteem by compromising with his father, at the moderate +expense of throwing overboard one or two indifferent details of his cargo +of principles. + +He and Harriet eloped to Scotland and got married. They took lodgings in +Edinburgh of a sort answerable to their purse, which was about empty, and +there their life was a happy, one and grew daily more so. They had only +themselves for company, but they needed no additions to it. They were as +cozy and contented as birds in a nest. Harriet sang evenings or read +aloud; also she studied and tried to improve her mind, her husband +instructing her in Latin. She was very beautiful, she was modest, quiet, +genuine, and, according to her husband's testimony, she had no fine lady +airs or aspirations about her. In Matthew Arnold's judgment, she was +"a pleasing figure." + +The pair remained five weeks in Edinburgh, and then took lodgings in +York, where Shelley's college mate, Hogg, lived. Shelley presently ran +down to London, and Hogg took this opportunity to make love to the young +wife. She repulsed him, and reported the fact to her husband when he got +back. It seems a pity that Shelley did not copy this creditable conduct +of hers some time or other when under temptation, so that we might have +seen the author of his biography hang the miracle in the skies and squirt +rainbows at it. + +At the end of the first year of marriage--the most trying year for any +young couple, for then the mutual failings are coming one by one to +light, and the necessary adjustments are being made in pain and +tribulation--Shelley was able to recognize that his marriage venture had +been a safe one. As we have seen, his love for his wife had begun in a +rather shallow way and with not much force, but now it was become deep +and strong, which entitles his wife to a broad credit mark, one may +admit. He addresses a long and loving poem to her, in which both passion +and worship appear: + +Exhibit A + + "O thou + Whose dear love gleamed upon the gloomy path + Which this lone spirit travelled, + . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . wilt thou not turn + Those spirit-beaming eyes and look on me. + Until I be assured that Earth is Heaven + And Heaven is Earth? + . . . . . . . . + Harriet! let death all mortal ties dissolve, + But ours shall not be mortal." + + +Shelley also wrote a sonnet to her in August of this same year in +celebration of her birthday: + +Exhibit B + + Ever as now with hove and Virtue's glow + May thy unwithering soul not cease to burn, + Still may thine heart with those pure thoughts o'erflow + Which force from mine such quick and warm return." + + +Was the girl of seventeen glad and proud and happy? We may conjecture +that she was. + +That was the year 1812. Another year passed still happily, still +successfully--a child was born in June, 1813, and in September, three +months later, Shelley addresses a poem to this child, Ianthe, in which he +points out just when the little creature is most particularly dear to +him: + +Exhibit C + + "Dearest when most thy tender traits express + The image of thy mother's loveliness." + + +Up to this point the fabulist counsel for Shelley and prosecutor of his +young wife has had easy sailing, but now his trouble begins, for Shelley +is getting ready to make some unpleasant history for himself, and it will +be necessary to put the blame of it on the wife. + +Shelley had made the acquaintance of a charming gray-haired, young- +hearted Mrs. Boinville, whose face "retained a certain youthful beauty"; +she lived at Bracknell, and had a young daughter named Cornelia Turner, +who was equipped with many fascinations. Apparently these people were +sufficiently sentimental. Hogg says of Mrs. Boinville: + + "The greater part of her associates were odious. I generally + found there two or three sentimental young butchers, an + eminently philosophical tinker, and several very + unsophisticated medical practitioners or medical students, all + of low origin and vulgar and offensive manners. They sighed, + turned up their eyes, retailed philosophy, such as it was," + etc. + +Shelley moved to Bracknell, July 27th (this is still 1813) purposely to +be near this unwholesome prairie-dogs' nest. The fabulist says: "It was +the entrance into a world more amiable and exquisite than he had yet +known." + +"In this acquaintance the attraction was mutual"--and presently it grew +to be very mutual indeed, between Shelley and Cornelia Turner, when they +got to studying the Italian poets together. Shelley, "responding like a +tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of sentiment," had his +chance here. It took only four days for Cornelia's attractions to begin +to dim Harriet's. Shelley arrived on the 27th of July; on the 31st he +wrote a sonnet to Harriet in which "one detects already the little rift +in the lover's lute which had seemed to be healed or never to have gaped +at all when the later and happier sonnet to Ianthe was written"--in +September, we remember: + +Exhibit D + + "EVENING. TO HARRIET + + "O thou bright Sun! Beneath the dark blue line + Of western distance that sublime descendest, + And, gleaming lovelier as thy beams decline, + Thy million hues to every vapor lendest, + And over cobweb, lawn, and grove, and stream + Sheddest the liquid magic of thy light, + Till calm Earth, with the parting splendor bright, + Shows like the vision of a beauteous dream; + What gazer now with astronomic eye + Could coldly count the spots within thy sphere? + Such were thy lover, Harriet, could he fly + The thoughts of all that makes his passion dear, + And turning senseless from thy warm caress + Pick flaws in our close-woven happiness." + + +I cannot find the "rift"; still it may be there. What the poem seems to +say is, that a person would be coldly ungrateful who could consent to +count and consider little spots and flaws in such a warm, great, +satisfying sun as Harriet is. It is a "little rift which had seemed to +be healed, or never to have gaped at all." That is, "one detects" a +little rift which perhaps had never existed. How does one do that? +How does one see the invisible? It is the fabulist's secret; he knows +how to detect what does not exist, he knows how to see what is not +seeable; it is his gift, and he works it many a time to poor dead Harriet +Shelley's deep damage. + +"As yet, however, if there was a speck upon Shelley's happiness it was no +more than a speck"--meaning the one which one detects where "it may never +have gaped at all"--"nor had Harriet cause for discontent." + +Shelley's Latin instructions to his wife had ceased. "From a teacher he +had now become a pupil." Mrs. Boinville and her young married daughter +Cornelia were teaching him Italian poetry; a fact which warns one to +receive with some caution that other statement that Harriet had no +"cause for discontent." + +Shelley had stopped instructing Harriet in Latin, as before mentioned. +The biographer thinks that the busy life in London some time back, and +the intrusion of the baby, account for this. These were hindrances, but +were there no others? He is always overlooking a detail here and there +that might be valuable in helping us understand a situation. For +instance, when a man has been hard at work at the Italian poets with a +pretty woman, hour after hour, and responding like a tremulous instrument +to every breath of passion or of sentiment in the meantime, that man is +dog-tired when he gets home, and he can't teach his wife Latin; it would +be unreasonable to expect it. + +Up to this time we have submitted to having Mrs. Boinville pushed upon +us as ostensibly concerned in these Italian lessons, but the biographer +drops her now, of his own accord. Cornelia "perhaps" is sole teacher. +Hogg says she was a prey to a kind of sweet melancholy, arising from +causes purely imaginary; she required consolation, and found it in +Petrarch. He also says, "Bysshe entered at once fully into her views and +caught the soft infection, breathing the tenderest and sweetest +melancholy, as every true poet ought." + +Then the author of the book interlards a most stately and fine compliment +to Cornelia, furnished by a man of approved judgment who knew her well +"in later years." It is a very good compliment indeed, and she no doubt +deserved it in her "later years," when she had for generations ceased to +be sentimental and lackadaisical, and was no longer engaged in enchanting +young husbands and sowing sorrow for young wives. But why is that +compliment to that old gentlewoman intruded there? Is it to make the +reader believe she was well-chosen and safe society for a young, +sentimental husband? The biographer's device was not well planned. That +old person was not present--it was her other self that was there, her +young, sentimental, melancholy, warm-blooded self, in those early sweet +times before antiquity had cooled her off and mossed her back. + +"In choosing for friends such women as Mrs. Newton, Mrs. Boinville, and +Cornelia Turner, Shelley gave good proof of his insight and +discrimination." That is the fabulist's opinion--Harriet Shelley's is +not reported. + +Early in August, Shelley was in London trying to raise money. In +September he wrote the poem to the baby, already quoted from. In +the first week of October Shelley and family went to Warwick, then +to Edinburgh, arriving there about the middle of the month. + +"Harriet was happy." Why? The author furnishes a reason, but hides from +us whether it is history or conjecture; it is because "the babe had borne +the journey well." It has all the aspect of one of his artful devices-- +flung in in his favorite casual way--the way he has when he wants to draw +one's attention away from an obvious thing and amuse it with some trifle +that is less obvious but more useful--in a history like this. The +obvious thing is, that Harriet was happy because there was much territory +between her husband and Cornelia Turner now; and because the perilous +Italian lessons were taking a rest; and because, if there chanced to be +any respondings like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or +of sentiment in stock in these days, she might hope to get a share of +them herself; and because, with her husband liberated, now, from the +fetid fascinations of that sentimental retreat so pitilessly described by +Hogg, who also dubbed it "Shelley's paradise" later, she might hope to +persuade him to stay away from it permanently; and because she might also +hope that his brain would cool, now, and his heart become healthy, and +both brain and heart consider the situation and resolve that it would be +a right and manly thing to stand by this girl-wife and her child and see +that they were honorably dealt with, and cherished and protected and +loved by the man that had promised these things, and so be made happy and +kept so. And because, also--may we conjecture this? --we may hope for +the privilege of taking up our cozy Latin lessons again, that used to be +so pleasant, and brought us so near together--so near, indeed, that often +our heads touched, just as heads do over Italian lessons; and our hands +met in casual and unintentional, but still most delicious and thrilling +little contacts and momentary clasps, just as they inevitably do over +Italian lessons. Suppose one should say to any young wife: "I find that +your husband is poring over the Italian poets and being instructed in the +beautiful Italian language by the lovely Cornelia Robinson"--would that +cozy picture fail to rise before her mind? would its possibilities fail +to suggest themselves to her? would there be a pang in her heart and a +blush on her face? or, on the contrary, would the remark give her +pleasure, make her joyous and gay? Why, one needs only to make the +experiment--the result will not be uncertain. + +However, we learn--by authority of deeply reasoned and searching +conjecture--that the baby bore the journey well, and that that was why +the young wife was happy. That accounts for two per cent. of the +happiness, but it was not right to imply that it accounted for the other +ninety-eight also. + +Peacock, a scholar, poet, and friend of the Shelleys, was of their party +when they went away. He used to laugh at the Boinville menagerie, and +"was not a favorite." One of the Boinville group, writing to Hogg, said, +"The Shelleys have made an addition to their party in the person of a +cold scholar, who, I think, has neither taste nor feeling. This, Shelley +will perceive sooner or later, for his warm nature craves sympathy." +True, and Shelley will fight his way back there to get it--there will be +no way to head him off. + +Towards the end of November it was necessary for Shelley to pay a +business visit to London, and he conceived the project of leaving Harriet +and the baby in Edinburgh with Harriet's sister, Eliza Westbrook, +a sensible, practical maiden lady about thirty years old, who had spent +a great part of her time with the family since the marriage. She was +an estimable woman, and Shelley had had reason to like her, and did like +her; but along about this time his feeling towards her changed. Part of +Shelley's plan, as he wrote Hogg, was to spend his London evenings with +the Newtons--members of the Boinville Hysterical Society. But, alas, +when he arrived early in December, that pleasant game was partially +blocked, for Eliza and the family arrived with him. We are left +destitute of conjectures at this point by the biographer, and it is my +duty to supply one. I chance the conjecture that it was Eliza who +interfered with that game. I think she tried to do what she could +towards modifying the Boinville connection, in the interest of her young +sister's peace and honor. + +If it was she who blocked that game, she was not strong enough to block +the next one. Before the month and year were out--no date given, let us +call it Christmas--Shelley and family were nested in a furnished house in +Windsor, "at no great distance from the Boinvilles"--these decoys still +residing at Bracknell. + +What we need, now, is a misleading conjecture. We get it with +characteristic promptness and depravity: + + "But Prince Athanase found not the aged Zonoras, the friend of + his boyhood, in any wanderings to Windsor. Dr. Lind had died + a year since, and with his death Windsor must have lost, for + Shelley, its chief attraction." + +Still, not to mention Shelley's wife, there was Bracknell, at any rate. +While Bracknell remains, all solace is not lost. Shelley is represented +by this biographer as doing a great many careless things, but to my mind +this hiring a furnished house for three months in order to be with a man +who has been dead a year, is the carelessest of them all. One feels for +him--that is but natural, and does us honor besides--yet one is vexed, +for all that. He could have written and asked about the aged Zonoras +before taking the house. He may not have had the address, but that is +nothing--any postman would know the aged Zonoras; a dead postman would +remember a name like that. + +And yet, why throw a rag like this to us ravening wolves? Is it +seriously supposable that we will stop to chew it and let our prey +escape? No, we are getting to expect this kind of device, and to give it +merely a sniff for certainty's sake and then walk around it and leave it +lying. Shelley was not after the aged Zonoras; he was pointed for +Cornelia and the Italian lessons, for his warm nature was craving +sympathy. + + +II + +The year 1813 is just ended now, and we step into 1814. + +To recapitulate, how much of Cornelia's society has Shelley had, thus +far? Portions of August and September, and four days of July. That is +to say, he has had opportunity to enjoy it, more or less, during that +brief period. Did he want some more of it? We must fall back upon +history, and then go to conjecturing. + + "In the early part of the year 1814, Shelley was a frequent + visitor at Bracknell." + +"Frequent" is a cautious word, in this author's mouth; the very +cautiousness of it, the vagueness of it, provokes suspicion; it makes one +suspect that this frequency was more frequent than the mere common +everyday kinds of frequency which one is in the habit of averaging up +with the unassuming term "frequent." I think so because they fixed up a +bedroom for him in the Boinville house. One doesn't need a bedroom if +one is only going to run over now and then in a disconnected way to +respond like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of +sentiment and rub up one's Italian poetry a little. + +The young wife was not invited, perhaps. If she was, she most certainly +did not come, or she would have straightened the room up; the most +ignorant of us knows that a wife would not endure a room in the condition +in which Hogg found this one when he occupied it one night. Shelley was +away--why, nobody can divine. Clothes were scattered about, there were +books on every side: "Wherever a book could be laid was an open book +turned down on its face to keep its place." It seems plain that the wife +was not invited. No, not that; I think she was invited, but said to +herself that she could not bear to go there and see another young woman +touching heads with her husband over an Italian book and making thrilling +hand-contacts with him accidentally. + +As remarked, he was a frequent visitor there, "where he found an easeful +resting-place in the house of Mrs. Boinville--the white-haired Maimuna-- +and of her daughter, Mrs. Turner." The aged Zonoras was deceased, but +the white-haired Maimuna was still on deck, as we see. "Three charming +ladies entertained the mocker (Hogg) with cups of tea, late hours, +Wieland's Agathon, sighs and smiles, and the celestial manna of refined +sentiment." + +"Such," says Hogg, "were the delights of Shelley's paradise in +Bracknell." + +The white-haired Maimuna presently writes to Hogg: + + "I will not have you despise home-spun pleasures. Shelley is + making a trial of them with us--" + +A trial of them. It may be called that. It was March 11, and he had +been in the house a month. She continues: + + Shelley "likes then so well that he is resolved to leave off + rambling--" + +But he has already left it off. He has been there a month. + + "And begin a course of them himself." + +But he has already begun it. He has been at it a month. He likes it so +well that he has forgotten all about his wife, as a letter of his +reveals. + + "Seriously, I think his mind and body want rest." + +Yet he has been resting both for a month, with Italian, and tea, and +manna of sentiment, and late hours, and every restful thing a young +husband could need for the refreshment of weary limbs and a sore +conscience, and a nagging sense of shabbiness and treachery. + + "His journeys after what he has never found have racked his + purse and his tranquillity. He is resolved to take a little + care of the former, in pity to the latter, which I applaud, and + shall second with all, my might." + +But she does not say whether the young wife, a stranger and lonely +yonder, wants another woman and her daughter Cornelia to be lavishing so +much inflamed interest on her husband or not. That young wife is always +silent--we are never allowed to hear from her. She must have opinions +about such things, she cannot be indifferent, she must be approving or +disapproving, surely she would speak if she were allowed--even to-day and +from her grave she would, if she could, I think--but we get only the +other side, they keep her silent always. + + "He has deeply interested us. In the course of your intimacy + he must have made you feel what we now feel for him. He is + seeking a house close to us--" + +Ah! he is not close enough yet, it seems-- + + "and if he succeeds we shall have an additional motive to + induce you to come among us in the summer." + +The reader would puzzle a long time and not guess the biographer's +comment upon the above letter. It is this: + + "These sound like words of s considerate and judicious friend." + +That is what he thinks. That is, it is what he thinks he thinks. No, +that is not quite it: it is what he thinks he can stupefy a particularly +and unspeakably dull reader into thinking it is what he thinks. He makes +that comment with the knowledge that Shelley is in love with this woman's +daughter, and that it is because of the fascinations of these two that +Shelley has deserted his wife--for this month, considering all the +circumstances, and his new passion, and his employment of the time, +amounted to desertion; that is its rightful name. We cannot know how the +wife regarded it and felt about it; but if she could have read the letter +which Shelley was writing to Hogg four or five days later, we could guess +her thought and how she felt. Hear him: + . . . . . . . + "I have been staying with Mrs. Boinville for the last month; + I have escaped, in the society of all that philosophy and + friendship combine, from the dismaying solitude of myself." + +It is fair to conjecture that he was feeling ashamed. + + "They have revived in my heart the expiring flame of life. + I have felt myself translated to a paradise which has nothing + of mortality but its transitoriness; my heart sickens at the + view of that necessity which will quickly divide me from the + delightful tranquillity of this happy home--for it has become + my home. + . . . . . . . + "Eliza is still with us--not here!--but will be with me when + the infinite malice of destiny forces me to depart." + +Eliza is she who blocked that game--the game in London--the one where we +were purposing to dine every night with one of the "three charming +ladies" who fed tea and manna and late hours to Hogg at Bracknell. + +Shelley could send Eliza away, of course; could have cleared her out long +ago if so minded, just as he had previously done with a predecessor of +hers whom he had first worshipped and then turned against; but perhaps +she was useful there as a thin excuse for staying away himself. + + "I am now but little inclined to contest this point. + I certainly hate her with all my heart and soul . . . . + + "It is a sight which awakens an inexpressible sensation of + disgust and horror, to see her caress my poor little Ianthe, + in whom I may hereafter find the consolation of sympathy. + I sometimes feel faint with the fatigue of checking the + overflowings of my unbounded abhorrence for this miserable + wretch. But she is no more than a blind and loathsome worm, + that cannot see to sting. + + "I have begun to learn Italian again . . . . Cornelia + assists me in this language. Did I not once tell you that I + thought her cold and reserved? She is the reverse of this, as + she is the reverse of everything bad. She inherits all the + divinity of her mother . . . . I have sometimes forgotten + that I am not an inmate of this delightful home--that a time + will come which will cast me again into the boundless ocean of + abhorred society. + + "I have written nothing but one stanza, which has no meaning, + and that I have only written in thought: + + "Thy dewy looks sink in my breast; + Thy gentle words stir poison there; + Thou hast disturbed the only rest + That was the portion of despair. + Subdued to duty's hard control, + I could have borne my wayward lot: + The chains that bind this rained soul + Had cankered then, but crushed it not. + + "This is the vision of a delirious and distempered dream, which + passes away at the cold clear light of morning. Its surpassing + excellence and exquisite perfections have no more reality than + the color of an autumnal sunset." + +Then it did not refer to his wife. That is plain; otherwise he would +have said so. It is well that he explained that it has no meaning, for +if he had not done that, the previous soft references to Cornelia and the +way he has come to feel about her now would make us think she was the +person who had inspired it while teaching him how to read the warm and +ruddy Italian poets during a month. + +The biography observes that portions of this letter "read like the tired +moaning of a wounded creature." Guesses at the nature of the wound are +permissible; we will hazard one. + +Read by the light of Shelley's previous history, his letter seems to be +the cry of a tortured conscience. Until this time it was a conscience +that had never felt a pang or known a smirch. It was the conscience of +one who, until this time, had never done a dishonorable thing, or an +ungenerous, or cruel, or treacherous thing, but was now doing all of +these, and was keenly aware of it. Up to this time Shelley had been +master of his nature, and it was a nature which was as beautiful and as +nearly perfect as any merely human nature may be. But he was drunk now, +with a debasing passion, and was not himself. There is nothing in his +previous history that is in character with the Shelley of this letter. +He had done boyish things, foolish things, even crazy things, but never +a thing to be ashamed of. He had done things which one might laugh at, +but the privilege of laughing was limited always to the thing itself; +you could not laugh at the motive back of it--that was high, that was +noble. His most fantastic and quixotic acts had a purpose back of them +which made them fine, often great, and made the rising laugh seem +profanation and quenched it; quenched it, and changed the impulse to +homage. + +Up to this time he had been loyalty itself, where his obligations lay-- +treachery was new to him; he had never done an ignoble thing--baseness +was new to him; he had never done an unkind thing that also was new to +him. + +This was the author of that letter, this was the man who had deserted his +young wife and was lamenting, because he must leave another woman's house +which had become a "home" to him, and go away. Is he lamenting mainly +because he must go back to his wife and child? No, the lament is mainly +for what he is to leave behind him. The physical comforts of the house? +No, in his life he had never attached importance to such things. Then +the thing which he grieves to leave is narrowed down to a person--to the +person whose "dewy looks" had sunk into his breast, and whose seducing +words had "stirred poison there." + +He was ashamed of himself, his conscience was upbraiding him. He was the +slave of a degrading love; he was drunk with his passion, the real +Shelley was in temporary eclipse. This is the verdict which his previous +history must certainly deliver upon this episode, I think. + +One must be allowed to assist himself with conjectures like these when +trying to find his way through a literary swamp which has so many +misleading finger-boards up as this book is furnished with. + +We have now arrived at a part of the swamp where the difficulties and +perplexities are going to be greater than any we have yet met with-- +where, indeed, the finger-boards are multitudinous, and the most of them +pointing diligently in the wrong direction. We are to be told by the +biography why Shelley deserted his wife and child and took up with +Cornelia Turner and Italian. It was not on account of Cornelia's sighs +and sentimentalities and tea and manna and late hours and soft and sweet +and industrious enticements; no, it was because "his happiness in his +home had been wounded and bruised almost to death." + +It had been wounded and bruised almost to death in this way: + +1st. Harriet persuaded him to set up a carriage. + +2d. After the intrusion of the baby, Harriet stopped reading aloud and +studying. + +3d. Harriet's walks with Hogg "commonly conducted us to some fashionable +bonnet-shop." + +4th. Harriet hired a wet-nurse. + +5th. When an operation was being performed upon the baby, "Harriet stood +by, narrowly observing all that was done, but, to the astonishment of the +operator, betraying not the smallest sign of emotion." + +6th. Eliza Westbrook, sister-in-law, was still of the household. + +The evidence against Harriet Shelley is all in; there is no more. Upon +these six counts she stands indicted of the crime of driving her husband +into that sty at Bracknell; and this crime, by these helps, the +biographical prosecuting attorney has set himself the task of proving +upon her. + +Does the biographer call himself the attorney for the prosecution? +No, only to himself, privately; publicly he is the passionless, +disinterested, impartial judge on the bench. He holds up his judicial +scales before the world, that all may see; and it all tries to look so +fair that a blind person would sometimes fail to see him slip the false +weights in. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, first, because Harriet had persuaded him to set up a carriage. +I cannot discover that any evidence is offered that she asked him to set +up a carriage. Still, if she did, was it a heavy offence? Was it +unique? Other young wives had committed it before, others have committed +it since. Shelley had dearly loved her in those London days; possibly he +set up the carriage gladly to please her; affectionate young husbands do +such things. When Shelley ran away with another girl, by-and-by, this +girl persuaded him to pour the price of many carriages and many horses +down the bottomless well of her father's debts, but this impartial judge +finds no fault with that. Once she appeals to Shelley to raise money-- +necessarily by borrowing, there was no other way--to pay her father's +debts with at a time when Shelley was in danger of being arrested and +imprisoned for his own debts; yet the good judge finds no fault with her +even for this. + +First and last, Shelley emptied into that rapacious mendicant's lap a sum +which cost him--for he borrowed it at ruinous rates--from eighty to one +hundred thousand dollars. But it was Mary Godwin's papa, the +supplications were often sent through Mary, the good judge is Mary's +strenuous friend, so Mary gets no censures. On the Continent Mary rode +in her private carriage, built, as Shelley boasts, "by one of the best +makers in Bond Street, "yet the good judge makes not even a passing +comment on this iniquity. Let us throw out Count No. 1 against Harriet +Shelley as being far-fetched, and frivolous. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, secondly, because Harriet's studies "had dwindled away to nothing, +Bysshe had ceased to express any interest in them." At what time was +this? It was when Harriet "had fully recovered from the fatigue of her +first effort of maternity,. . . and was now in full force, vigor, and +effect." Very well, the baby was born two days before the close of June. +It took the mother a month to get back her full force, vigor, and effect; +this brings us to July 27th and the deadly Cornelia. If a wife of +eighteen is studying with her husband and he gets smitten with another +woman, isn't he likely to lose interest in his wife's studies for that +reason, and is not his wife's interest in her studies likely to languish +for the same reason? Would not the mere sight of those books of hers +sharpen the pain that is in her heart? This sudden breaking down of a +mutual intellectual interest of two years' standing is coincident with +Shelley's re-encounter with Cornelia; and we are allowed to gather from +that time forth for nearly two months he did all his studying in that +person's society. We feel at liberty to rule out Count No. 2 from the +indictment against Harriet. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, thirdly, because Harriet's walks with Hogg commonly led to some +fashionable bonnet-shop. I offer no palliation; I only ask why the +dispassionate, impartial judge did not offer one himself--merely, I mean, +to offset his leniency in a similar case or two where the girl who ran +away with Harriet's husband was the shopper. There are several occasions +where she interested herself with shopping--among them being walks which +ended at the bonnet-shop--yet in none of these cases does she get a word +of blame from the good judge, while in one of them he covers the deed +with a justifying remark, she doing the shopping that time to find +easement for her mind, her child having died. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fourthly, by the introduction there of a wet-nurse. The wet-nurse +was introduced at the time of the Edinburgh sojourn, immediately after +Shelley had been enjoying the two months of study with Cornelia which +broke up his wife's studies and destroyed his personal interest in them. +Why, by this time, nothing that Shelley's wife could do would have been +satisfactory to him, for he was in love with another woman, and was never +going to be contented again until he got back to her. If he had been +still in love with his wife it is not easily conceivable that he would +care much who nursed the baby, provided the baby was well nursed. +Harriet's jealousy was assuredly voicing itself now, Shelley's conscience +was assuredly nagging him, pestering him, persecuting him. Shelley +needed excuses for his altered attitude towards his wife; Providence +pitied him and sent the wet-nurse. If Providence had sent him a cotton +doughnut it would have answered just as well; all he wanted was something +to find fault with. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fifthly, because Harriet narrowly watched a surgical operation +which was being performed upon her child, and, "to the astonishment of +the operator," who was watching Harriet instead of attending to his +operation, she betrayed "not the smallest sign of emotion." The author +of this biography was not ashamed to set down that exultant slander. +He was apparently not aware that it was a small business to bring into +his court a witness whose name he does not know, and whose character and +veracity there is none to vouch for, and allow him to strike this blow at +the mother-heart of this friendless girl. The biographer says, "We may +not infer from this that Harriet did not feel"--why put it in, then?-- +"but we learn that those about her could believe her to be hard and +insensible." Who were those who were about her? Her husband? He hated +her now, because he was in love elsewhere. Her sister? Of course that +is not charged. Peacock? Peacock does not testify. The wet-nurse? She +does not testify. If any others were there we have no mention of them. +"Those about her" are reduced to one person--her husband. Who reports +the circumstance? It is Hogg. Perhaps he was there--we do not know. +But if he was, he still got his information at second-hand, as it was the +operator who noticed Harriet's lack of emotion, not himself. Hogg is not +given to saying kind things when Harriet is his subject. He may have +said them the time that he tried to tempt her to soil her honor, but +after that he mentions her usually with a sneer. "Among those who were +about her" was one witness well equipped to silence all tongues, abolish +all doubts, set our minds at rest; one witness, not called, and not +callable, whose evidence, if we could but get it, would outweigh the +oaths of whole battalions of hostile Hoggs and nameless surgeons--the +baby. I wish we had the baby's testimony; and yet if we had it it would +not do us any good--a furtive conjecture, a sly insinuation, a pious +"if" or two, would be smuggled in, here and there, with a solemn air of +judicial investigation, and its positiveness would wilt into dubiety. + +The biographer says of Harriet, "If words of tender affection and +motherly pride proved the reality of love, then undoubtedly she loved her +firstborn child." That is, if mere empty words can prove it, it stands +proved--and in this way, without committing himself, he gives the reader +a chance to infer that there isn't any extant evidence but words, and +that he doesn't take much stock in them. How seldom he shows his hand! +He is always lurking behind a non-committal "if" or something of that +kind; always gliding and dodging around, distributing colorless poison +here and there and everywhere, but always leaving himself in a position +to say that his language will be found innocuous if taken to pieces and +examined. He clearly exhibits a steady and never-relaxing purpose to +make Harriet the scapegoat for her husband's first great sin--but it is +in the general view that this is revealed, not in the details. His +insidious literature is like blue water; you know what it is that makes +it blue, but you cannot produce and verify any detail of the cloud of +microscopic dust in it that does it. Your adversary can dip up a +glassful and show you that it is pure white and you cannot deny it; and +he can dip the lake dry, glass by glass, and show that every glassful is +white, and prove it to any one's eye--and yet that lake was blue and you +can swear it. This book is blue--with slander in solution. + +Let the reader examine, for example, the paragraph of comment which +immediately follows the letter containing Shelley's self-exposure which +we have been considering. This is it. One should inspect the individual +sentences as they go by, then pass them in procession and review the +cake-walk as a whole: + + "Shelley's happiness in his home, as is evident from this + pathetic letter, had been fatally stricken; it is evident, + also, that he knew where duty lay; he felt that his part was to + take up his burden, silently and sorrowfully, and to bear it + henceforth with the quietness of despair. But we can perceive + that he scarcely possessed the strength and fortitude needful + for success in such an attempt. And clearly Shelley himself + was aware how perilous it was to accept that respite of + blissful ease which he enjoyed in the Boinville household; for + gentle voices and dewy looks and words of sympathy could not + fail to remind him of an ideal of tranquillity or of joy which + could never be his, and which he must henceforth sternly + exclude from his imagination." + +That paragraph commits the author in no way. Taken sentence by sentence +it asserts nothing against anybody or in favor of anybody, pleads for +nobody, accuses nobody. Taken detail by detail, it is as innocent as +moonshine. And yet, taken as a whole, it is a design against the reader; +its intent is to remove the feeling which the letter must leave with him +if let alone, and put a different one in its place--to remove a feeling +justified by the letter and substitute one not justified by it. The +letter itself gives you no uncertain picture--no lecturer is needed to +stand by with a stick and point out its details and let on to explain +what they mean. The picture is the very clear and remorsefully faithful +picture of a fallen and fettered angel who is ashamed of himself; an +angel who beats his soiled wings and cries, who complains to the woman +who enticed him that he could have borne his wayward lot, he could have +stood by his duty if it had not been for her beguilements; an angel who +rails at the "boundless ocean of abhorred society," and rages at his poor +judicious sister-in-law. If there is any dignity about this spectacle it +will escape most people. + +Yet when the paragraph of comment is taken as a whole, the picture is +full of dignity and pathos; we have before us a blameless and noble +spirit stricken to the earth by malign powers, but not conquered; +tempted, but grandly putting the temptation away; enmeshed by subtle +coils, but sternly resolved to rend them and march forth victorious, at +any peril of life or limb. Curtain--slow music. + +Was it the purpose of the paragraph to take the bad taste of Shelley's +letter out of the reader's mouth? If that was not it, good ink was +wasted; without that, it has no relevancy--the multiplication table would +have padded the space as rationally. + +We have inspected the six reasons which we are asked to believe drove a +man of conspicuous patience, honor, justice, fairness, kindliness, and +iron firmness, resolution, and steadfastness, from the wife whom he loved +and who loved him, to a refuge in the mephitic paradise of Bracknell. +These are six infinitely little reasons; but there were six colossal +ones, and these the counsel for the destruction of Harriet Shelley +persists in not considering very important. + +Moreover, the colossal six preceded the little six and had done the +mischief before they were born. Let us double-column the twelve; then we +shall see at a glance that each little reason is in turn answered by a +retorting reason of a size to overshadow it and make it insignificant: + +1. Harriet sets up carriage. 1. CORNELIA TURNER. +2. Harriet stops studying. 2. CORNELIA TURNER. +3. Harriet goes to bonnet-shop. 3. CORNELIA TURNER. +4. Harriet takes a wet-nurse. 4. CORNELIA TURNER. +5. Harriet has too much nerve. 5. CORNELIA TURNER. +6. Detested sister-in-law.fi. 6. CORNELIA TURNER. + +As soon as we comprehend that Cornelia Turner and the Italian lessons +happened before the little six had been discovered to be grievances, +we understand why Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and +bruised almost to death, and no one can persuade us into laying it on +Harriet. Shelley and Cornelia are the responsible persons, and we cannot +in honor and decency allow the cruelties which they practised upon the +unoffending wife to be pushed aside in order to give us a chance to waste +time and tears over six sentimental justifications of an offence which +the six can't justify, nor even respectably assist in justifying. + +Six? There were seven; but in charity to the biographer the seventh +ought not to be exposed. Still, he hung it out himself, and not only +hung it out, but thought it was a good point in Shelley's favor. For two +years Shelley found sympathy and intellectual food and all that at home; +there was enough for spiritual and mental support, but not enough for +luxury; and so, at the end of the contented two years, this latter detail +justifies him in going bag and baggage over to Cornelia Turner and +supplying the rest of his need in the way of surplus sympathy and +intellectual pie unlawfully. By the same reasoning a man in merely +comfortable circumstances may rob a bank without sin. + + +III + +It is 1814, it is the 16th of March, Shelley has, written his letter, he +has been in the Boinville paradise a month, his deserted wife is in her +husbandless home. Mischief had been wrought. It is the biographer who +concedes this. We greatly need some light on Harriet's side of the case +now; we need to know how she enjoyed the month, but there is no way to +inform ourselves; there seems to be a strange absence of documents and +letters and diaries on that side. Shelley kept a diary, the approaching +Mary Godwin kept a diary, her father kept one, her half-sister by +marriage, adoption, and the dispensation of God kept one, and the entire +tribe and all its friends wrote and received letters, and the letters +were kept and are producible when this biography needs them; but there +are only three or four scraps of Harriet's writing, and no diary. +Harriet wrote plenty of letters to her husband--nobody knows where they +are, I suppose; she wrote plenty of letters to other people--apparently +they have disappeared, too. Peacock says she wrote good letters, but +apparently interested people had sagacity enough to mislay them in time. +After all her industry she went down into her grave and lies silent +there--silent, when she has so much need to speak. We can only wonder at +this mystery, not account for it. + +No, there is no way of finding out what Harriet's state of feeling was +during the month that Shelley was disporting himself in the Bracknell +paradise. We have to fall back upon conjecture, as our fabulist does +when he has nothing more substantial to work with. Then we easily +conjecture that as the days dragged by Harriet's heart grew heavier and +heavier under its two burdens--shame and resentment: the shame of being +pointed at and gossiped about as a deserted wife, and resentment against +the woman who had beguiled her husband from her and now kept him in a +disreputable captivity. Deserted wives--deserted whether for cause or +without cause--find small charity among the virtuous and the discreet. +We conjecture that one after another the neighbors ceased to call; that +one after another they got to being "engaged" when Harriet called; that +finally they one after the other cut her dead on the street; that after +that she stayed in the house daytimes, and brooded over her sorrows, and +nighttimes did the same, there being nothing else to do with the heavy +hours and the silence and solitude and the dreary intervals which sleep +should have charitably bridged, but didn't. + +Yes, mischief had been wrought. The biographer arrives at this +conclusion, and it is a most just one. Then, just as you begin to half +hope he is going to discover the cause of it and launch hot bolts of +wrath at the guilty manufacturers of it, you have to turn away +disappointed. You are disappointed, and you sigh. This is what he says +--the italics [''] are mine: + + "However the mischief may have been wrought--'and at this day + no one can wish to heap blame an any buried head'--" + +So it is poor Harriet, after all. Stern justice must take its course-- +justice tempered with delicacy, justice tempered with compassion, justice +that pities a forlorn dead girl and refuses to strike her. Except in the +back. Will not be ignoble and say the harsh thing, but only insinuate +it. Stern justice knows about the carriage and the wet-nurse and the +bonnet-shop and the other dark things that caused this sad mischief, and +may not, must not blink them; so it delivers judgment where judgment +belongs, but softens the blow by not seeming to deliver judgment at all. +To resume--the italics are mine: + + "However the mischief may have been wrought--and at this day no + one can wish to heap blame on any buried head--'it is certain + that some cause or causes of deep division between Shelley and + his wife were in operation during the early part of the year + 1814'." + +This shows penetration. No deduction could be more accurate than this. +There were indeed some causes of deep division. But next comes another +disappointing sentence: + + "To guess at the precise nature of these cafes, in the absence + of definite statement, were useless." + +Why, he has already been guessing at them for several pages, and we have +been trying to outguess him, and now all of a sudden he is tired of it +and won't play any more. It is not quite fair to us. However, he will +get over this by-and-by, when Shelley commits his next indiscretion and +has to be guessed out of it at Harriet's expense. + +"We may rest content with Shelley's own words"--in a Chancery paper drawn +up by him three years later. They were these: "Delicacy forbids me to +say more than that we were disunited by incurable dissensions." + +As for me, I do not quite see why we should rest content with anything of +the sort. It is not a very definite statement. It does not necessarily +mean anything more than that he did not wish to go into the tedious +details of those family quarrels. Delicacy could quite properly excuse +him from saying, "I was in love with Cornelia all that time; my wife kept +crying and worrying about it and upbraiding me and begging me to cut +myself free from a connection which was wronging her and disgracing us +both; and I being stung by these reproaches retorted with fierce and +bitter speeches--for it is my nature to do that when I am stirred, +especially if the target of them is a person whom I had greatly loved and +respected before, as witness my various attitudes towards Miss Hitchener, +the Gisbornes, Harriet's sister, and others--and finally I did not +improve this state of things when I deserted my wife and spent a whole +month with the woman who had infatuated me." + +No, he could not go into those details, and we excuse him; but, +nevertheless, we do not rest content with this bland proposition to puff +away that whole long disreputable episode with a single mean, meaningless +remark of Shelley's. + +We do admit that "it is certain that some cause or causes of deep +division were in operation." We would admit it just the same if the +grammar of the statement were as straight as a string, for we drift into +pretty indifferent grammar ourselves when we are absorbed in historical +work; but we have to decline to admit that we cannot guess those cause or +causes. + +But guessing is not really necessary. There is evidence attainable-- +evidence from the batch discredited by the biographer and set out at the +back door in his appendix-basket; and yet a court of law would think +twice before throwing it out, whereas it would be a hardy person who +would venture to offer in such a place a good part of the material which +is placed before the readers of this book as "evidence," and so treated +by this daring biographer. Among some letters (in the appendix-basket) +from Mrs. Godwin, detailing the Godwinian share in the Shelleyan events +of 1814, she tells how Harriet Shelley came to her and her husband, +agitated and weeping, to implore them to forbid Shelley the house, and +prevent his seeing Mary Godwin. + + "She related that last November he had fallen in love with Mrs. + Turner and paid her such marked attentions Mr. Turner, the + husband, had carried off his wife to Devonshire." + +The biographer finds a technical fault in this; "the Shelleys were in +Edinburgh in November." What of that? The woman is recalling a +conversation which is more than two months old; besides, she was probably +more intent upon the central and important fact of it than upon its +unimportant date. Harriet's quoted statement has some sense in it; for +that reason, if for no other, it ought to have been put in the body of +the book. Still, that would not have answered; even the biographer's +enemy could not be cruel enough to ask him to let this real grievance, +this compact and substantial and picturesque figure, this rawhead-and- +bloody-bones, come striding in there among those pale shams, those +rickety spectres labeled WET-NURSE, BONNET-SHOP, and so on--no, the +father of all malice could not ask the biographer to expose his pathetic +goblins to a competition like that. + +The fabulist finds fault with the statement because it has a technical +error in it; and he does this at the moment that he is furnishing us an +error himself, and of a graver sort. He says: + + "If Turner carried off his wife to Devonshire he brought her + back and Shelley was staying with her and her mother on terms + of cordial intimacy in March, 1814." + +We accept the "cordial intimacy"--it was the very thing Harriet was +complaining of--but there is nothing to show that it was Turner who +brought his wife back. The statement is thrown in as if it were not only +true, but was proof that Turner was not uneasy. Turner's movements are +proof of nothing. Nothing but a statement from Turner's mouth would have +any value here, and he made none. + +Six days after writing his letter Shelley and his wife were together +again for a moment--to get remarried according to the rites of the +English Church. + +Within three weeks the new husband and wife were apart again, and the +former was back in his odorous paradise. This time it is the wife who +does the deserting. She finds Cornelia too strong for her, probably. +At any rate, she goes away with her baby and sister, and we have a +playful fling at her from good Mrs. Boinville, the "mysterious spinner +Maimuna"; she whose "face was as a damsel's face, and yet her hair was +gray"; she of whom the biographer has said, "Shelley was indeed caught in +an almost invisible thread spun around him, but unconsciously, by this +subtle and benignant enchantress." The subtle and benignant enchantress +writes to Hogg, April 18: "Shelley is again a widower; his beauteous half +went to town on Thursday." + +Then Shelley writes a poem--a chant of grief over the hard fate which +obliges him now to leave his paradise and take up with his wife again. +It seems to intimate that the paradise is cooling towards him; that he is +warned off by acclamation; that he must not even venture to tempt with +one last tear his friend Cornelia's ungentle mood, for her eye is glazed +and cold and dares not entreat her lover to stay: + +Exhibit E + + "Pause not! the time is past! Every voice cries 'Away!' + Tempt not with one last tear thy friend's ungentle mood; + Thy lover's eye, so glazed and cold, dares not entreat thy + stay: + Duty and dereliction guide thee back to solitude." + +Back to the solitude of his now empty home, that is! + + "Away! away! to thy sad and silent home; + Pour bitter tears on its desolated hearth." + . . . . . . . . + +But he will have rest in the grave by-and-by. Until that time comes, +the charms of Bracknell will remain in his memory, along with Mrs. +Boinville's voice and Cornelia Turner's smile: + + "Thou in the grave shalt rest--yet, till the phantoms flee + Which that house and hearth and garden made dear to thee ere while, + Thy remembrance and repentance and deep musings are not free + From the music of two voices and the light of one sweet smile." + +We cannot wonder that Harriet could not stand it. Any of us would have +left. We would not even stay with a cat that was in this condition. +Even the Boinvilles could not endure it; and so, as we have seen, they +gave this one notice. + + "Early in May, Shelley was in London. He did not yet despair + of reconciliation with Harriet, nor had he ceased to love her." + +Shelley's poems are a good deal of trouble to his biographer. They are +constantly inserted as "evidence," and they make much confusion. As soon +as one of them has proved one thing, another one follows and proves quite +a different thing. The poem just quoted shows that he was in love with +Cornelia, but a month later he is in love with Harriet again, and there +is a poem to prove it. + + "In this piteous appeal Shelley declares that he has now no + grief but one--the grief of having known and lost his wife's + love." + +Exhibit F + + "Thy look of love has power to calm + The stormiest passion of my soul." + + +But without doubt she had been reserving her looks of love a good part of +the time for ten months, now--ever since he began to lavish his own on +Cornelia Turner at the end of the previous July. He does really seem to +have already forgotten Cornelia's merits in one brief month, for he +eulogizes Harriet in a way which rules all competition out: + + "Thou only virtuous, gentle, kind, + Amid a world of hate." + +He complains of her hardness, and begs her to make the concession of +a "slight endurance"--of his waywardness, perhaps--for the sake of +"a fellow-being's lasting weal." But the main force of his appeal is +in his closing stanza, and is strongly worded: + + "O tract for once no erring guide! + Bid the remorseless feeling flee; + 'Tis malice, 'tis revenge, 'tis pride, + 'Tis anything but thee; + I deign a nobler pride to prove, + And pity if thou canst not love." + +This is in May--apparently towards the end of it. Harriet and Shelley +were corresponding all the time. Harriet got the poem--a copy exists in +her own handwriting; she being the only gentle and kind person amid a +world of hate, according to Shelley's own testimony in the poem, we are +permitted to think that the daily letters would presently have melted +that kind and gentle heart and brought about the reconciliation, if there +had been time but there wasn't; for in a very few days--in fact, before +the 8th of June--Shelley was in love with another woman. + +And so--perhaps while Harriet was walking the floor nights, trying to get +her poem by heart--her husband was doing a fresh one--for the other girl +--Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin--with sentiments like these in it: + +Exhibit G + + To spend years thus and be rewarded, + As thou, sweet love, requited me + When none were near. + . . . thy lips did meet + Mine tremblingly; . . , + + " Gentle and good and mild thou art, + Nor can I live if thou appear + Aught but thyself." . . . + + +And so on. "Before the close of June it was known and felt by Mary and +Shelley that each was inexpressibly dear to the other." Yes, Shelley had +found this child of sixteen to his liking, and had wooed and won her in +the graveyard. But that is nothing; it was better than wooing her in her +nursery, at any rate, where it might have disturbed the other children. + +However, she was a child in years only. From the day that she set her +masculine grip on Shelley he was to frisk no more. If she had occupied +the only kind and gentle Harriet's place in March it would have been a +thrilling spectacle to see her invade the Boinville rookery and read the +riot act. That holiday of Shelley's would have been of short duration, +and Cornelia's hair would have been as gray as her mother's when the +services were over. + +Hogg went to the Godwin residence in Skinner Street with Shelley on that +8th of June. They passed through Godwin's little debt-factory of a book- +shop and went up-stairs hunting for the proprietor. Nobody there. +Shelley strode about the room impatiently, making its crazy floor quake +under him. Then a door "was partially and softly opened. A thrilling +voice called 'Shelley!' A thrilling voice answered, 'Mary!' And he +darted out of the room like an arrow from the bow of the far-shooting +King. A very young female, fair and fair-haired, pale, indeed, and with +a piercing look, wearing a frock of tartan, an unusual dress in London at +that time, had called him out of the room." + +This is Mary Godwin, as described by Hogg. The thrill of the voices +shows that the love of Shelley and Mary was already upward of a fortnight +old; therefore it had been born within the month of May--born while +Harriet was still trying to get her poem by heart, we think. I must not +be asked how I know so much about that thrill; it is my secret. The +biographer and I have private ways of finding out things when it is +necessary to find them out and the customary methods fail. + +Shelley left London that day, and was gone ten days. The biographer +conjectures that he spent this interval with Harriet in Bath. It would +be just like him. To the end of his days he liked to be in love with two +women at once. He was more in love with Miss Hitchener when he married +Harriet than he was with Harriet, and told the lady so with simple and +unostentatious candor. He was more in love with Cornelia than he was +with Harriet in the end of 1813 and the beginning of 1814, yet he +supplied both of them with love poems of an equal temperature meantime; +he loved Mary and Harriet in June, and while getting ready to run off +with the one, it is conjectured that he put in his odd time trying to get +reconciled to the other; by-and-by, while still in love with Mary, he +will make love to her half-sister by marriage, adoption, and the +visitation of God, through the medium of clandestine letters, and she +will answer with letters that are for no eye but his own. + +When Shelley encountered Mary Godwin he was looking around for another +paradise. He had, tastes of his own, and there were features about the +Godwin establishment that strongly recommended it. Godwin was an +advanced thinker and an able writer. One of his romances is still read, +but his philosophical works, once so esteemed, are out of vogue now; +their authority was already declining when Shelley made his acquaintance +--that is, it was declining with the public, but not with Shelley. They +had been his moral and political Bible, and they were that yet. Shelley +the infidel would himself have claimed to be less a work of God than a +work of Godwin. Godwin's philosophies had formed his mind and interwoven +themselves into it and become a part of its texture; he regarded himself +as Godwin's spiritual son. Godwin was not without self-appreciation; +indeed, it may be conjectured that from his point of view the last +syllable of his name was surplusage. He lived serene in his lofty world +of philosophy, far above the mean interests that absorbed smaller men, +and only came down to the ground at intervals to pass the hat for alms to +pay his debts with, and insult the man that relieved him. Several of his +principles were out of the ordinary. For example, he was opposed to +marriage. He was not aware that his preachings from this text were but +theory and wind; he supposed he was in earnest in imploring people to +live together without marrying, until Shelley furnished him a working +model of his scheme and a practical example to analyze, by applying the +principle in his own family; the matter took a different and surprising +aspect then. The late Matthew Arnold said that the main defect in +Shelley's make-up was that he was destitute of the sense of humor. This +episode must have escaped Mr. Arnold's attention. + +But we have said enough about the head of the new paradise. Mrs. Godwin +is described as being in several ways a terror; and even when her soul +was in repose she wore green spectacles. But I suspect that her main +unattractiveness was born of the fact that she wrote the letters that are +out in the appendix-basket in the back yard--letters which are an outrage +and wholly untrustworthy, for they say some kind things about poor +Harriet and tell some disagreeable truths about her husband; and these +things make the fabulist grit his teeth a good deal. + +Next we have Fanny Godwin--a Godwin by courtesy only; she was Mrs. +Godwin's natural daughter by a former friend. She was a sweet and +winning girl, but she presently wearied of the Godwin paradise, and +poisoned herself. + +Last in the list is Jane (or Claire, as she preferred to call herself) +Clairmont, daughter of Mrs. Godwin by a former marriage. She was very +young and pretty and accommodating, and always ready to do what she could +to make things pleasant. After Shelley ran off with her part-sister +Mary, she became the guest of the pair, and contributed a natural child +to their nursery--Allegra. Lord Byron was the father. + +We have named the several members and advantages of the new paradise in +Skinner Street, with its crazy book-shop underneath. Shelley was all +right now, this was a better place than the other; more variety anyway, +and more different kinds of fragrance. One could turn out poetry here +without any trouble at all. + +The way the new love-match came about was this: + +Shelley told Mary all his aggravations and sorrows and griefs, and about +the wet-nurse and the bonnetshop and the surgeon and the carriage, and +the sister-in-law that blocked the London game, and about Cornelia and +her mamma, and how they had turned him out of the house after making so +much of him; and how he had deserted Harriet and then Harriet had +deserted him, and how the reconciliation was working along and Harriet +getting her poem by heart; and still he was not happy, and Mary pitied +him, for she had had trouble herself. But I am not satisfied with this. +It reads too much like statistics. It lacks smoothness and grace, and is +too earthy and business-like. It has the sordid look of a trades-union +procession out on strike. That is not the right form for it. The book +does it better; we will fall back on the book and have a cake-walk: + + "It was easy to divine that some restless grief possessed him; + Mary herself was not unlearned in the lore of pain. His + generous zeal in her father's behalf, his spiritual sonship to + Godwin, his reverence for her mother's memory, were guarantees + with Mary of his excellence.--[What she was after was + guarantees of his excellence. That he stood ready to desert + his wife and child was one of them, apparently.]-- The new + friends could not lack subjects of discourse, and underneath + their words about Mary's mother, and 'Political Justice,' and + 'Rights of Woman,' were two young hearts, each feeling towards + the other, each perhaps unaware, trembling in the direction of + the other. The desire to assuage the suffering of one whose + happiness has grown precious to us may become a hunger of the + spirit as keen as any other, and this hunger now possessed + Mary's heart; when her eyes rested unseen on Shelley, it was + with a look full of the ardor of a 'soothing pity.'" + +Yes, that is better and has more composure. That is just the way it +happened. He told her about the wet-nurse, she told him about political +justice; he told her about the deadly sister-in-law, she told him about +her mother; he told her about the bonnet-shop, she murmured back about +the rights of woman; then he assuaged her, then she assuaged him; then he +assuaged her some more, next she assuaged him some more; then they both +assuaged one another simultaneously; and so they went on by the hour +assuaging and assuaging and assuaging, until at last what was the result? +They were in love. It will happen so every time. + + "He had married a woman who, as he now persuaded himself, had + never truly loved him, who loved only his fortune and his rank, + and who proved her selfishness by deserting him in his misery." + +I think that that is not quite fair to Harriet. We have no certainty +that she knew Cornelia had turned him out of the house. He went back to +Cornelia, and Harriet may have supposed that he was as happy with her as +ever. Still, it was judicious to begin to lay on the whitewash, for +Shelley is going to need many a coat of it now, and the sooner the reader +becomes used to the intrusion of the brush the sooner he will get +reconciled to it and stop fretting about it. + +After Shelley's (conjectured) visit to Harriet at Bath--8th of June to +18th-- "it seems to have been arranged that Shelley should henceforth +join the Skinner Street household each day at dinner." + +Nothing could be handier than this; things will swim along now. + + "Although now Shelley was coming to believe that his wedded + union with Harriet was a thing of the past, he had not ceased + to regard her with affectionate consideration; he wrote to her + frequently, and kept her informed of his whereabouts." + +We must not get impatient over these curious inharmoniousnesses and +irreconcilabilities in Shelley's character. You can see by the +biographer's attitude towards them that there is nothing objectionable +about them. Shelley was doing his best to make two adoring young +creatures happy: he was regarding the one with affectionate consideration +by mail, and he was assuaging the other one at home. + + "Unhappy Harriet, residing at Bath, had perhaps never desired + that the breach between herself and her husband should be + irreparable and complete." + +I find no fault with that sentence except that the "perhaps" is not +strictly warranted. It should have been left out. In support--or shall +we say extenuation? --of this opinion I submit that there is not +sufficient evidence to warrant the uncertainty which it implies. The +only "evidence" offered that Harriet was hard and proud and standing out +against a reconciliation is a poem--the poem in which Shelley beseeches +her to "bid the remorseless feeling flee" and "pity" if she "cannot +love." We have just that as "evidence," and out of its meagre materials +the biographer builds a cobhouse of conjectures as big as the Coliseum; +conjectures which convince him, the prosecuting attorney, but ought to +fall far short of convincing any fair-minded jury. + +Shelley's love-poems may be very good evidence, but we know well that +they are "good for this day and train only." We are able to believe that +they spoke the truth for that one day, but we know by experience that +they could not be depended on to speak it the next. The very +supplication for a rewarming of Harriet's chilled love was followed so +suddenly by the poet's plunge into an adoring passion for Mary Godwin +that if it had been a check it would have lost its value before a lazy +person could have gotten to the bank with it. + +Hardness, stubbornness, pride, vindictiveness--these may sometimes reside +in a young wife and mother of nineteen, but they are not charged against +Harriet Shelley outside of that poem, and one has no right to insert them +into her character on such shadowy "evidence" as that. Peacock knew +Harriet well, and she has a flexible and persuadable look, as painted by +him: + + "Her manners were good, and her whole aspect and demeanor such + manifest emanations of pure and truthful nature that to be once + in her company was to know her thoroughly. She was fond of her + husband, and accommodated herself in every way to his tastes. + If they mixed in society, she adorned it; if they lived in + retirement, she was satisfied; if they travelled, she enjoyed + the change of scene." + +"Perhaps" she had never desired that the breach should be irreparable and +complete. The truth is, we do not even know that there was any breach at +all at this time. We know that the husband and wife went before the +altar and took a new oath on the 24th of March to love and cherish each +other until death--and this may be regarded as a sort of reconciliation +itself, and a wiping out of the old grudges. Then Harriet went away, and +the sister-in-law removed herself from her society. That was in April. +Shelley wrote his "appeal" in May, but the corresponding went right along +afterwards. We have a right to doubt that the subject of it was a +"reconciliation," or that Harriet had any suspicion that she needed to be +reconciled and that her husband was trying to persuade her to it--as the +biographer has sought to make us believe, with his Coliseum of +conjectures built out of a waste-basket of poetry. For we have +"evidence" now--not poetry and conjecture. When Shelley had been dining +daily in the Skinner Street paradise fifteen days and continuing the +love-match which was already a fortnight old twenty-five days earlier, +he forgot to write Harriet; forgot it the next day and the next. During +four days Harriet got no letter from him. Then her fright and anxiety +rose to expression-heat, and she wrote a letter to Shelley's publisher +which seems to reveal to us that Shelley's letters to her had been the +customary affectionate letters of husband to wife, and had carried no +appeals for reconciliation and had not needed to: + + "BATH (postmark July 7, 1814). + "MY DEAR SIR,-- You will greatly oblige me by giving the + enclosed to Mr. Shelley. I would not trouble you, but it is + now four days since I have heard from him, which to me is an + age. Will you write by return of post and tell me what has + become of him? as I always fancy something dreadful has + happened if I do not hear from him. If you tell me that he is + well I shall not come to London, but if I do not hear from you + or him I shall certainly come, as I cannot endure this dreadful + state of suspense. You are his friend and you can feel for me. + "I remain yours truly, + "H. S." + + +Even without Peacock's testimony that "her whole aspect and demeanor were +manifest emanations of a pure and truthful nature," we should hold this +to be a truthful letter, a sincere letter, a loving letter; it bears +those marks; I think it is also the letter of a person accustomed to +receiving letters from her husband frequently, and that they have been of +a welcome and satisfactory sort, too, this long time back--ever since the +solemn remarriage and reconciliation at the altar most likely. + +The biographer follows Harriet's letter with a conjecture. +He conjectures that she "would now gladly have retraced her steps." +Which means that it is proven that she had steps to retrace--proven by +the poem. Well, if the poem is better evidence than the letter, we must +let it stand at that. + +Then the biographer attacks Harriet Shelley's honor--by authority of +random and unverified gossip scavengered from a group of people whose +very names make a person shudder: Mary Godwin, mistress to Shelley; her +part-sister, discarded mistress of Lord Byron; Godwin, the philosophical +tramp, who gathers his share of it from a shadow--that is to say, from a +person whom he shirks out of naming. Yet the biographer dignifies this +sorry rubbish with the name of "evidence." + +Nothing remotely resembling a distinct charge from a named person +professing to know is offered among this precious "evidence." + +1. "Shelley believed" so and so. + +2. Byron's discarded mistress says that Shelley told Mary Godwin so and +so, and Mary told her. + +3. "Shelley said" so and so--and later "admitted over and over again +that he had been in error." + +4. The unspeakable Godwin "wrote to Mr. Baxter" that he knew so and so +"from unquestionable authority"--name not furnished. + +How-any man in his right mind could bring himself to defile the grave of +a shamefully abused and defenceless girl with these baseless +fabrications, this manufactured filth, is inconceivable. How any man, in +his right mind or out of it, could sit down and coldly try to persuade +anybody to believe it, or listen patiently to it, or, indeed, do anything +but scoff at it and deride it, is astonishing. + +The charge insinuated by these odious slanders is one of the most +difficult of all offences to prove; it is also one which no man has a +right to mention even in a whisper about any woman, living or dead, +unless he knows it to be true, and not even then unless he can also prove +it to be true. There is no justification for the abomination of putting +this stuff in the book. + +Against Harriet Shelley's good name there is not one scrap of tarnishing +evidence, and not even a scrap of evil gossip, that comes from a source +that entitles it to a hearing. + +On the credit side of the account we have strong opinions from the people +who knew her best. Peacock says: + + "I feel it due to the memory of Harriet to state my most + decided conviction that her conduct as a wife was as pure, as + true, as absolutely faultless, as that of any who for such + conduct are held most in honor." + +Thornton Hunt, who had picked and published slight flaws in Harriet's +character, says, as regards this alleged large one: + + "There is not a trace of evidence or a whisper of scandal + against her before her voluntary departure from Shelley." + +Trelawney says: + + "I was assured by the evidence of the few friends who knew both + Shelley and his wife--Hookham, Hogg, Peacock, and one of the + Godwins--that Harriet was perfectly innocent of all offence." + +What excuse was there for raking up a parcel of foul rumors from +malicious and discredited sources and flinging them at this dead girl's +head? Her very defencelessness should have been her protection. The +fact that all letters to her or about her, with almost every scrap of her +own writing, had been diligently mislaid, leaving her case destitute of a +voice, while every pen-stroke which could help her husband's side had +been as diligently preserved, should have excused her from being brought +to trial. Her witnesses have all disappeared, yet we see her summoned in +her grave-clothes to plead for the life of her character, without the +help of an advocate, before a disqualified judge and a packed jury. + +Harriet Shelley wrote her distressed letter on the 7th of July. On the +28th her husband ran away with Mary Godwin and her part-sister Claire to +the Continent. He deserted his wife when her confinement was +approaching. She bore him a child at the end of November, his mistress +bore him another one something over two months later. The truants were +back in London before either of these events occurred. + +On one occasion, presently, Shelley was so pressed for money to support +his mistress with that he went to his wife and got some money of his that +was in her hands--twenty pounds. Yet the mistress was not moved to +gratitude; for later, when the wife was troubled to meet her engagements, +the mistress makes this entry in her diary: + + "Harriet sends her creditors here; nasty woman. Now we shall + have to change our lodgings." + +The deserted wife bore the bitterness and obloquy of her situation two +years and a quarter; then she gave up, and drowned herself. A month +afterwards the body was found in the water. Three weeks later Shelley +married his mistress. + +I must here be allowed to italicize a remark of the biographer's +concerning Harriet Shelley: + + "That no act of Shelley's during the two years which + immediately preceded her death tended to cause the rash act + which brought her life to its close seems certain." + +Yet her husband had deserted her and her children, and was living with a +concubine all that time! Why should a person attempt to write biography +when the simplest facts have no meaning to him? This book is littered +with as crass stupidities as that one--deductions by the page which bear +no discoverable kinship to their premises. + +The biographer throws off that extraordinary remark without any +perceptible disturbance to his serenity; for he follows it with a +sentimental justification of Shelley's conduct which has not a pang of +conscience in it, but is silky and smooth and undulating and pious-- +a cake-walk with all the colored brethren at their best. There may be +people who can read that page and keep their temper, but it is doubtful. +Shelley's life has the one indelible blot upon it, but is otherwise +worshipfully noble and beautiful. It even stands out indestructibly +gracious and lovely from the ruck of these disastrous pages, in spite of +the fact that they expose and establish his responsibility for his +forsaken wife's pitiful fate--a responsibility which he himself tacitly +admits in a letter to Eliza Westbrook, wherein he refers to his taking up +with Mary Godwin as an act which Eliza "might excusably regard as the +cause of her sister's ruin." + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg Etext of Defence of Harriet Shelley, by Twain + diff --git a/old/mtdhs10.zip b/old/mtdhs10.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..334b0b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/mtdhs10.zip diff --git a/old/mtdhs11.txt b/old/mtdhs11.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ad0f060 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/mtdhs11.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2012 @@ +The Project Gutenberg Etext of Defense of Harriet Shelley, by Twain +#32 in our series by Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) + +Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the +copyright laws for your country before distributing this or any other +Project Gutenberg file. + +We encourage you to keep this file, exactly as it is, on your +own disk, thereby keeping an electronic path open for future +readers. Please do not remove this. + +This header should be the first thing seen when anyone starts to +view the etext. Do not change or edit it without written permission. +The words are carefully chosen to provide users with the +information they need to understand what they may and may not +do with the etext. + + +**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** + +**Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** + +*****These Etexts Are Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** + +Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get etexts, and +further information, is included below. We need your donations. + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a 501(c)(3) +organization with EIN [Employee Identification Number] 64-6221541 + + + +Title: In Defense of Harriet Shelley + +Author: Mark Twain + +Release Date: April, 2002 [Etext #3171] +[Yes, we are about one year ahead of schedule] +[This file was first posted on February 8, 2001] +[Most recently updated: November 29, 2001] + +Edition: 11 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +The Project Gutenberg Etext of Defense of Harriet Shelley, by Twain +*******This file should be named mtdhs11.txt or mtdhs11.zip******** + +Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, mtdhs12.txt +VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, mtdhs11a.txt + +This etext was produced by David Widger <widger@cecomet.net> + +Project Gutenberg Etexts are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not +keep etexts in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +We are now trying to release all our etexts one year in advance +of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. +Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections, +even years after the official publication date. + +Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til +midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. +The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at +Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A +preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment +and editing by those who wish to do so. + +Most people start at our sites at: +http://gutenberg.net or +http://promo.net/pg + +These Web sites include award-winning information about Project +Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new +etexts, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!). + + +Those of you who want to download any Etext before announcement +can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is +also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the +indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an +announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter. + +http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext03 or +ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext03 + +Or /etext02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90 + +Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want, +as it appears in our Newsletters. + + +Information about Project Gutenberg (one page) + +We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The +time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours +to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright +searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our +projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value +per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2 +million dollars per hour in 2001 as we release over 50 new Etext +files per month, or 500 more Etexts in 2000 for a total of 4000+ +If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total +should reach over 300 billion Etexts given away by year's end. + +The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext +Files by December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000 = 1 Trillion] +This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, +which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users. + +At our revised rates of production, we will reach only one-third +of that goal by the end of 2001, or about 4,000 Etexts. We need +funding, as well as continued efforts by volunteers, to maintain +or increase our production and reach our goals. + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created +to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +As of November, 2001, contributions are being solicited from people +and organizations in: Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, +Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, +Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New +Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, +Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, +Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, +and Wyoming. + +*In Progress + +We have filed in about 45 states now, but these are the only ones +that have responded. + +As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list +will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states. +Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state. + +In answer to various questions we have received on this: + +We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally +request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and +you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have, +just ask. + +While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are +not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting +donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to +donate. + +International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about +how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made +deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are +ways. + +All donations should be made to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 + +Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment +method other than by check or money order. + + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by +the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN +[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are +tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fundraising +requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be +made and fundraising will begin in the additional states. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +You can get up to date donation information at: + +http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html + + +*** + +If you can't reach Project Gutenberg, +you can always email directly to: + +Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com> + +Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message. + +We would prefer to send you information by email. + + +**The Legal Small Print** + + +(Three Pages) + +***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START*** +Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers. +They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with +your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from +someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our +fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement +disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how +you may distribute copies of this etext if you want to. + +*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT +By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept +this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by +sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person +you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical +medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request. + +ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS +This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etexts, +is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart +through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project"). +Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright +on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and +distribute it in the United States without permission and +without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth +below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext +under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark. + +Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market +any commercial products without permission. + +To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable +efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain +works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any +medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other +things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged +disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES +But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below, +[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may +receive this etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims +all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including +legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR +UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, +INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE +OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE +POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. + +If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of +receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) +you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that +time to the person you received it from. If you received it +on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and +such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement +copy. If you received it electronically, such person may +choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to +receive it electronically. + +THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS +TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A +PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or +the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the +above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you +may have other legal rights. + +INDEMNITY +You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation, +and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated +with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including +legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the +following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this etext, +[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the etext, +or [3] any Defect. + +DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm" +You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by +disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this +"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg, +or: + +[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this + requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the + etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however, + if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable + binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, + including any form resulting from conversion by word + processing or hypertext software, but only so long as + *EITHER*: + + [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and + does *not* contain characters other than those + intended by the author of the work, although tilde + (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may + be used to convey punctuation intended by the + author, and additional characters may be used to + indicate hypertext links; OR + + [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at + no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent + form by the program that displays the etext (as is + the case, for instance, with most word processors); + OR + + [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at + no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the + etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC + or other equivalent proprietary form). + +[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this + "Small Print!" statement. + +[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the + gross profits you derive calculated using the method you + already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you + don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are + payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation" + the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were + legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent + periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to + let us know your plans and to work out the details. + +WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO? +Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of +public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed +in machine readable form. + +The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time, +public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses. +Money should be paid to the: +"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or +software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at: +hart@pobox.com + +[Portions of this header are copyright (C) 2001 by Michael S. Hart +and may be reprinted only when these Etexts are free of all fees.] +[Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be used in any sales +of Project Gutenberg Etexts or other materials be they hardware or +software or any other related product without express permission.] + +*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.10/04/01*END* + + + + + +This etext was produced by David Widger <widger@cecomet.net> + + + + + +IN DEFENSE OF HARRIET SHELLEY + +by Mark Twain + + + +I + +I have committed sins, of course; but I have not committed enough of them +to entitle me to the punishment of reduction to the bread and water of +ordinary literature during six years when I might have been living on the +fat diet spread for the righteous in Professor Dowden's Life of Shelley, +if I had been justly dealt with. + +During these six years I have been living a life of peaceful ignorance. +I was not aware that Shelley's first wife was unfaithful to him, and that +that was why he deserted her and wiped the stain from his sensitive honor +by entering into soiled relations with Godwin's young daughter. This was +all new to me when I heard it lately, and was told that the proofs of it +were in this book, and that this book's verdict is accepted in the girls' +colleges of America and its view taught in their literary classes. + +In each of these six years multitudes of young people in our country have +arrived at the Shelley-reading age. Are these six multitudes +unacquainted with this life of Shelley? Perhaps they are; indeed, one +may feel pretty sure that the great bulk of them are. To these, then, I +address myself, in the hope that some account of this romantic historical +fable and the fabulist's manner of constructing and adorning it may +interest them. + +First, as to its literary style. Our negroes in America have several +ways of entertaining themselves which are not found among the whites +anywhere. Among these inventions of theirs is one which is particularly +popular with them. It is a competition in elegant deportment. They hire +a hall and bank the spectators' seats in rising tiers along the two +sides, leaving all the middle stretch of the floor free. A cake is +provided as a prize for the winner in the competition, and a bench of +experts in deportment is appointed to award it. Sometimes there are as +many as fifty contestants, male and female, and five hundred spectators. +One at a time the contestants enter, clothed regardless of expense in +what each considers the perfection of style and taste, and walk down the +vacant central space and back again with that multitude of critical eyes +on them. All that the competitor knows of fine airs and graces he throws +into his carriage, all that he knows of seductive expression he throws +into his countenance. He may use all the helps he can devise: watch- +chain to twirl with his fingers, cane to do graceful things with, snowy +handkerchief to flourish and get artful effects out of, shiny new +stovepipe hat to assist in his courtly bows; and the colored lady may +have a fan to work up her effects with, and smile over and blush behind, +and she may add other helps, according to her judgment. When the review +by individual detail is over, a grand review of all the contestants in +procession follows, with all the airs and graces and all the bowings and +smirkings on exhibition at once, and this enables the bench of experts to +make the necessary comparisons and arrive at a verdict. The successful +competitor gets the prize which I have before mentioned, and an abundance +of applause and envy along with it. The negroes have a name for this +grave deportment-tournament; a name taken from the prize contended for. +They call it a Cakewalk. + +This Shelley biography is a literary cake-walk. The ordinary forms of +speech are absent from it. All the pages, all the paragraphs, walk by +sedately, elegantly, not to say mincingly, in their Sunday-best, shiny +and sleek, perfumed, and with boutonnieres in their button-holes; it is +rare to find even a chance sentence that has forgotten to dress. If the +book wishes to tell us that Mary Godwin, child of sixteen, had known +afflictions, the fact saunters forth in this nobby outfit: "Mary was +herself not unlearned in the lore of pain"--meaning by that that she had +not always traveled on asphalt; or, as some authorities would frame it, +that she had "been there herself," a form which, while preferable to the +book's form, is still not to be recommended. If the book wishes to tell +us that Harriet Shelley hired a wet-nurse, that commonplace fact gets +turned into a dancing-master, who does his professional bow before us in +pumps and knee-breeches, with his fiddle under one arm and his crush-hat +under the other, thus: "The beauty of Harriet's motherly relation to her +babe was marred in Shelley's eyes by the introduction into his house of a +hireling nurse to whom was delegated the mother's tenderest office." + +This is perhaps the strangest book that has seen the light since +Frankenstein. Indeed, it is a Frankenstein itself; a Frankenstein with +the original infirmity supplemented by a new one; a Frankenstein with the +reasoning faculty wanting. Yet it believes it can reason, and is always +trying. It is not content to leave a mountain of fact standing in the +clear sunshine, where the simplest reader can perceive its form, its +details, and its relation to the rest of the landscape, but thinks it +must help him examine it and understand it; so its drifting mind settles +upon it with that intent, but always with one and the same result: there +is a change of temperature and the mountain is hid in a fog. Every time +it sets up a premise and starts to reason from it, there is a surprise in +store for the reader. It is strangely nearsighted, cross-eyed, and +purblind. Sometimes when a mastodon walks across the field of its vision +it takes it for a rat; at other times it does not see it at all. + +The materials of this biographical fable are facts, rumors, and poetry. +They are connected together and harmonized by the help of suggestion, +conjecture, innuendo, perversion, and semi-suppression. + +The fable has a distinct object in view, but this object is not +acknowledged in set words. Percy Bysshe Shelley has done something which +in the case of other men is called a grave crime; it must be shown that +in his case it is not that, because he does not think as other men do +about these things. + +Ought not that to be enough, if the fabulist is serious? Having proved +that a crime is not a crime, was it worth while to go on and fasten the +responsibility of a crime which was not a crime upon somebody else? What +is the use of hunting down and holding to bitter account people who are +responsible for other people's innocent acts? + +Still, the fabulist thinks it a good idea to do that. In his view +Shelley's first wife, Harriet, free of all offense as far as we have +historical facts for guidance, must be held unforgivably responsible for +her husband's innocent act in deserting her and taking up with another +woman. + +Any one will suspect that this task has its difficulties. Any one will +divine that nice work is necessary here, cautious work, wily work, and +that there is entertainment to be had in watching the magician do it. +There is indeed entertainment in watching him. He arranges his facts, +his rumors, and his poems on his table in full view of the house, and +shows you that everything is there--no deception, everything fair and +above board. And this is apparently true, yet there is a defect, for +some of his best stock is hid in an appendix-basket behind the door, and +you do not come upon it until the exhibition is over and the enchantment +of your mind accomplished--as the magician thinks. + +There is an insistent atmosphere of candor and fairness about this book +which is engaging at first, then a little burdensome, then a trifle +fatiguing, then progressively suspicious, annoying, irritating, and +oppressive. It takes one some little time to find out that phrases which +seem intended to guide the reader aright are there to mislead him; that +phrases which seem intended to throw light are there to throw darkness; +that phrases which seem intended to interpret a fact are there to +misinterpret it; that phrases which seem intended to forestall prejudice +are there to create it; that phrases which seem antidotes are poisons in +disguise. The naked facts arrayed in the book establish Shelley's guilt +in that one episode which disfigures his otherwise superlatively lofty +and beautiful life; but the historian's careful and methodical +misinterpretation of them transfers the responsibility to the wife's +shoulders as he persuades himself. The few meagre facts of Harriet +Shelley's life, as furnished by the book, acquit her of offense; but by +calling in the forbidden helps of rumor, gossip, conjecture, insinuation, +and innuendo he destroys her character and rehabilitates Shelley's--as he +believes. And in truth his unheroic work has not been barren of the +results he aimed at; as witness the assertion made to me that girls in +the colleges of America are taught that Harriet Shelley put a stain upon +her husband's honor, and that that was what stung him into repurifying +himself by deserting her and his child and entering into scandalous +relations with a school-girl acquaintance of his. + +If that assertion is true, they probably use a reduction of this work in +those colleges, maybe only a sketch outlined from it. Such a thing as +that could be harmful and misleading. They ought to cast it out and put +the whole book in its place. It would not deceive. It would not deceive +the janitor. + +All of this book is interesting on account of the sorcerer's methods and +the attractiveness of some of his characters and the repulsiveness of the +rest, but no part of it is so much so as are the chapters wherein he +tries to think he thinks he sets forth the causes which led to Shelley's +desertion of his wife in 1814. + +Harriet Westbrook was a school-girl sixteen years old. Shelley was +teeming with advanced thought. He believed that Christianity was a +degrading and selfish superstition, and he had a deep and sincere desire +to rescue one of his sisters from it. Harriet was impressed by his +various philosophies and looked upon him as an intellectual wonder-- +which indeed he was. He had an idea that she could give him valuable +help in his scheme regarding his sister; therefore he asked her to +correspond with him. She was quite willing. Shelley was not thinking of +love, for he was just getting over a passion for his cousin, Harriet +Grove, and just getting well steeped in one for Miss Hitchener, a school- +teacher. What might happen to Harriet Westbrook before the letter- +writing was ended did not enter his mind. Yet an older person could have +made a good guess at it, for in person Shelley was as beautiful as an +angel, he was frank, sweet, winning, unassuming, and so rich in +unselfishness, generosities, and magnanimities that he made his whole +generation seem poor in these great qualities by comparison. Besides, +he was in distress. His college had expelled him for writing an +atheistical pamphlet and afflicting the reverend heads of the university +with it, his rich father and grandfather had closed their purses against +him, his friends were cold. Necessarily, Harriet fell in love with him; +and so deeply, indeed, that there was no way for Shelley to save her from +suicide but to marry her. He believed himself to blame for this state of +things, so the marriage took place. He was pretty fairly in love with +Harriet, although he loved Miss Hitchener better. He wrote and explained +the case to Miss Hitchener after the wedding, and he could not have been +franker or more naive and less stirred up about the circumstance if the +matter in issue had been a commercial transaction involving thirty-five +dollars. + +Shelley was nineteen. He was not a youth, but a man. He had never had +any youth. He was an erratic and fantastic child during eighteen years, +then he stepped into manhood, as one steps over a door-sill. He was +curiously mature at nineteen in his ability to do independent thinking +on the deep questions of life and to arrive at sharply definite decisions +regarding them, and stick to them--stick to them and stand by them at +cost of bread, friendships, esteem, respect, and approbation. + +For the sake of his opinions he was willing to sacrifice all these +valuable things, and did sacrifice them; and went on doing it, too, when +he could at any moment have made himself rich and supplied himself with +friends and esteem by compromising with his father, at the moderate +expense of throwing overboard one or two indifferent details of his cargo +of principles. + +He and Harriet eloped to Scotland and got married. They took lodgings in +Edinburgh of a sort answerable to their purse, which was about empty, and +there their life was a happy, one and grew daily more so. They had only +themselves for company, but they needed no additions to it. They were as +cozy and contented as birds in a nest. Harriet sang evenings or read +aloud; also she studied and tried to improve her mind, her husband +instructing her in Latin. She was very beautiful, she was modest, quiet, +genuine, and, according to her husband's testimony, she had no fine lady +airs or aspirations about her. In Matthew Arnold's judgment, she was +"a pleasing figure." + +The pair remained five weeks in Edinburgh, and then took lodgings in +York, where Shelley's college mate, Hogg, lived. Shelley presently ran +down to London, and Hogg took this opportunity to make love to the young +wife. She repulsed him, and reported the fact to her husband when he got +back. It seems a pity that Shelley did not copy this creditable conduct +of hers some time or other when under temptation, so that we might have +seen the author of his biography hang the miracle in the skies and squirt +rainbows at it. + +At the end of the first year of marriage--the most trying year for any +young couple, for then the mutual failings are coming one by one to +light, and the necessary adjustments are being made in pain and +tribulation--Shelley was able to recognize that his marriage venture had +been a safe one. As we have seen, his love for his wife had begun in a +rather shallow way and with not much force, but now it was become deep +and strong, which entitles his wife to a broad credit mark, one may +admit. He addresses a long and loving poem to her, in which both passion +and worship appear: + +Exhibit A + + "O thou + Whose dear love gleamed upon the gloomy path + Which this lone spirit travelled, + . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . wilt thou not turn + Those spirit-beaming eyes and look on me. + Until I be assured that Earth is Heaven + And Heaven is Earth? + . . . . . . . . + Harriet! let death all mortal ties dissolve, + But ours shall not be mortal." + + +Shelley also wrote a sonnet to her in August of this same year in +celebration of her birthday: + +Exhibit B + + "Ever as now with hove and Virtue's glow + May thy unwithering soul not cease to burn, + Still may thine heart with those pure thoughts o'erflow + Which force from mine such quick and warm return." + + +Was the girl of seventeen glad and proud and happy? We may conjecture +that she was. + +That was the year 1812. Another year passed still happily, still +successfully--a child was born in June, 1813, and in September, three +months later, Shelley addresses a poem to this child, Ianthe, in which he +points out just when the little creature is most particularly dear to +him: + +Exhibit C + + "Dearest when most thy tender traits express + The image of thy mother's loveliness." + + +Up to this point the fabulist counsel for Shelley and prosecutor of his +young wife has had easy sailing, but now his trouble begins, for Shelley +is getting ready to make some unpleasant history for himself, and it will +be necessary to put the blame of it on the wife. + +Shelley had made the acquaintance of a charming gray-haired, young- +hearted Mrs. Boinville, whose face "retained a certain youthful beauty"; +she lived at Bracknell, and had a young daughter named Cornelia Turner, +who was equipped with many fascinations. Apparently these people were +sufficiently sentimental. Hogg says of Mrs. Boinville: + + "The greater part of her associates were odious. I generally + found there two or three sentimental young butchers, an + eminently philosophical tinker, and several very + unsophisticated medical practitioners or medical students, all + of low origin and vulgar and offensive manners. They sighed, + turned up their eyes, retailed philosophy, such as it was," + etc. + +Shelley moved to Bracknell, July 27th (this is still 1813) purposely to +be near this unwholesome prairie-dogs' nest. The fabulist says: "It was +the entrance into a world more amiable and exquisite than he had yet +known." + +"In this acquaintance the attraction was mutual"--and presently it grew +to be very mutual indeed, between Shelley and Cornelia Turner, when they +got to studying the Italian poets together. Shelley, "responding like a +tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of sentiment," had his +chance here. It took only four days for Cornelia's attractions to begin +to dim Harriet's. Shelley arrived on the 27th of July; on the 31st he +wrote a sonnet to Harriet in which "one detects already the little rift +in the lover's lute which had seemed to be healed or never to have gaped +at all when the later and happier sonnet to Ianthe was written"--in +September, we remember: + +Exhibit D + + "EVENING. TO HARRIET + + "O thou bright Sun! Beneath the dark blue line + Of western distance that sublime descendest, + And, gleaming lovelier as thy beams decline, + Thy million hues to every vapor lendest, + And over cobweb, lawn, and grove, and stream + Sheddest the liquid magic of thy light, + Till calm Earth, with the parting splendor bright, + Shows like the vision of a beauteous dream; + What gazer now with astronomic eye + Could coldly count the spots within thy sphere? + Such were thy lover, Harriet, could he fly + The thoughts of all that makes his passion dear, + And turning senseless from thy warm caress + Pick flaws in our close-woven happiness." + + +I cannot find the "rift"; still it may be there. What the poem seems to +say is, that a person would be coldly ungrateful who could consent to +count and consider little spots and flaws in such a warm, great, +satisfying sun as Harriet is. It is a "little rift which had seemed to +be healed, or never to have gaped at all." That is, "one detects" a +little rift which perhaps had never existed. How does one do that? +How does one see the invisible? It is the fabulist's secret; he knows +how to detect what does not exist, he knows how to see what is not +seeable; it is his gift, and he works it many a time to poor dead Harriet +Shelley's deep damage. + +"As yet, however, if there was a speck upon Shelley's happiness it was no +more than a speck"--meaning the one which one detects where "it may never +have gaped at all"--"nor had Harriet cause for discontent." + +Shelley's Latin instructions to his wife had ceased. "From a teacher he +had now become a pupil." Mrs. Boinville and her young married daughter +Cornelia were teaching him Italian poetry; a fact which warns one to +receive with some caution that other statement that Harriet had no +"cause for discontent." + +Shelley had stopped instructing Harriet in Latin, as before mentioned. +The biographer thinks that the busy life in London some time back, and +the intrusion of the baby, account for this. These were hindrances, but +were there no others? He is always overlooking a detail here and there +that might be valuable in helping us understand a situation. For +instance, when a man has been hard at work at the Italian poets with a +pretty woman, hour after hour, and responding like a tremulous instrument +to every breath of passion or of sentiment in the meantime, that man is +dog-tired when he gets home, and he can't teach his wife Latin; it would +be unreasonable to expect it. + +Up to this time we have submitted to having Mrs. Boinville pushed upon +us as ostensibly concerned in these Italian lessons, but the biographer +drops her now, of his own accord. Cornelia "perhaps" is sole teacher. +Hogg says she was a prey to a kind of sweet melancholy, arising from +causes purely imaginary; she required consolation, and found it in +Petrarch. He also says, "Bysshe entered at once fully into her views and +caught the soft infection, breathing the tenderest and sweetest +melancholy, as every true poet ought." + +Then the author of the book interlards a most stately and fine compliment +to Cornelia, furnished by a man of approved judgment who knew her well +"in later years." It is a very good compliment indeed, and she no doubt +deserved it in her "later years," when she had for generations ceased to +be sentimental and lackadaisical, and was no longer engaged in enchanting +young husbands and sowing sorrow for young wives. But why is that +compliment to that old gentlewoman intruded there? Is it to make the +reader believe she was well-chosen and safe society for a young, +sentimental husband? The biographer's device was not well planned. That +old person was not present--it was her other self that was there, her +young, sentimental, melancholy, warm-blooded self, in those early sweet +times before antiquity had cooled her off and mossed her back. + +"In choosing for friends such women as Mrs. Newton, Mrs. Boinville, and +Cornelia Turner, Shelley gave good proof of his insight and +discrimination." That is the fabulist's opinion--Harriet Shelley's is +not reported. + +Early in August, Shelley was in London trying to raise money. In +September he wrote the poem to the baby, already quoted from. In +the first week of October Shelley and family went to Warwick, then +to Edinburgh, arriving there about the middle of the month. + +"Harriet was happy." Why? The author furnishes a reason, but hides from +us whether it is history or conjecture; it is because "the babe had borne +the journey well." It has all the aspect of one of his artful devices-- +flung in in his favorite casual way--the way he has when he wants to draw +one's attention away from an obvious thing and amuse it with some trifle +that is less obvious but more useful--in a history like this. The +obvious thing is, that Harriet was happy because there was much territory +between her husband and Cornelia Turner now; and because the perilous +Italian lessons were taking a rest; and because, if there chanced to be +any respondings like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or +of sentiment in stock in these days, she might hope to get a share of +them herself; and because, with her husband liberated, now, from the +fetid fascinations of that sentimental retreat so pitilessly described by +Hogg, who also dubbed it "Shelley's paradise" later, she might hope to +persuade him to stay away from it permanently; and because she might also +hope that his brain would cool, now, and his heart become healthy, and +both brain and heart consider the situation and resolve that it would be +a right and manly thing to stand by this girl-wife and her child and see +that they were honorably dealt with, and cherished and protected and +loved by the man that had promised these things, and so be made happy and +kept so. And because, also--may we conjecture this?--we may hope for +the privilege of taking up our cozy Latin lessons again, that used to be +so pleasant, and brought us so near together--so near, indeed, that often +our heads touched, just as heads do over Italian lessons; and our hands +met in casual and unintentional, but still most delicious and thrilling +little contacts and momentary clasps, just as they inevitably do over +Italian lessons. Suppose one should say to any young wife: "I find that +your husband is poring over the Italian poets and being instructed in the +beautiful Italian language by the lovely Cornelia Robinson"--would that +cozy picture fail to rise before her mind? would its possibilities fail +to suggest themselves to her? would there be a pang in her heart and a +blush on her face? or, on the contrary, would the remark give her +pleasure, make her joyous and gay? Why, one needs only to make the +experiment--the result will not be uncertain. + +However, we learn--by authority of deeply reasoned and searching +conjecture--that the baby bore the journey well, and that that was why +the young wife was happy. That accounts for two per cent. of the +happiness, but it was not right to imply that it accounted for the other +ninety-eight also. + +Peacock, a scholar, poet, and friend of the Shelleys, was of their party +when they went away. He used to laugh at the Boinville menagerie, and +"was not a favorite." One of the Boinville group, writing to Hogg, said, +"The Shelleys have made an addition to their party in the person of a +cold scholar, who, I think, has neither taste nor feeling. This, Shelley +will perceive sooner or later, for his warm nature craves sympathy." +True, and Shelley will fight his way back there to get it--there will be +no way to head him off. + +Towards the end of November it was necessary for Shelley to pay a +business visit to London, and he conceived the project of leaving Harriet +and the baby in Edinburgh with Harriet's sister, Eliza Westbrook, +a sensible, practical maiden lady about thirty years old, who had spent +a great part of her time with the family since the marriage. She was +an estimable woman, and Shelley had had reason to like her, and did like +her; but along about this time his feeling towards her changed. Part of +Shelley's plan, as he wrote Hogg, was to spend his London evenings with +the Newtons--members of the Boinville Hysterical Society. But, alas, +when he arrived early in December, that pleasant game was partially +blocked, for Eliza and the family arrived with him. We are left +destitute of conjectures at this point by the biographer, and it is my +duty to supply one. I chance the conjecture that it was Eliza who +interfered with that game. I think she tried to do what she could +towards modifying the Boinville connection, in the interest of her young +sister's peace and honor. + +If it was she who blocked that game, she was not strong enough to block +the next one. Before the month and year were out--no date given, let us +call it Christmas--Shelley and family were nested in a furnished house in +Windsor, "at no great distance from the Boinvilles"--these decoys still +residing at Bracknell. + +What we need, now, is a misleading conjecture. We get it with +characteristic promptness and depravity: + + "But Prince Athanase found not the aged Zonoras, the friend of + his boyhood, in any wanderings to Windsor. Dr. Lind had died + a year since, and with his death Windsor must have lost, for + Shelley, its chief attraction." + +Still, not to mention Shelley's wife, there was Bracknell, at any rate. +While Bracknell remains, all solace is not lost. Shelley is represented +by this biographer as doing a great many careless things, but to my mind +this hiring a furnished house for three months in order to be with a man +who has been dead a year, is the carelessest of them all. One feels for +him--that is but natural, and does us honor besides--yet one is vexed, +for all that. He could have written and asked about the aged Zonoras +before taking the house. He may not have had the address, but that is +nothing--any postman would know the aged Zonoras; a dead postman would +remember a name like that. + +And yet, why throw a rag like this to us ravening wolves? Is it +seriously supposable that we will stop to chew it and let our prey +escape? No, we are getting to expect this kind of device, and to give it +merely a sniff for certainty's sake and then walk around it and leave it +lying. Shelley was not after the aged Zonoras; he was pointed for +Cornelia and the Italian lessons, for his warm nature was craving +sympathy. + + +II + +The year 1813 is just ended now, and we step into 1814. + +To recapitulate, how much of Cornelia's society has Shelley had, thus +far? Portions of August and September, and four days of July. That is +to say, he has had opportunity to enjoy it, more or less, during that +brief period. Did he want some more of it? We must fall back upon +history, and then go to conjecturing. + + "In the early part of the year 1814, Shelley was a frequent + visitor at Bracknell." + +"Frequent" is a cautious word, in this author's mouth; the very +cautiousness of it, the vagueness of it, provokes suspicion; it makes one +suspect that this frequency was more frequent than the mere common +everyday kinds of frequency which one is in the habit of averaging up +with the unassuming term "frequent." I think so because they fixed up a +bedroom for him in the Boinville house. One doesn't need a bedroom if +one is only going to run over now and then in a disconnected way to +respond like a tremulous instrument to every breath of passion or of +sentiment and rub up one's Italian poetry a little. + +The young wife was not invited, perhaps. If she was, she most certainly +did not come, or she would have straightened the room up; the most +ignorant of us knows that a wife would not endure a room in the condition +in which Hogg found this one when he occupied it one night. Shelley was +away--why, nobody can divine. Clothes were scattered about, there were +books on every side: "Wherever a book could be laid was an open book +turned down on its face to keep its place." It seems plain that the wife +was not invited. No, not that; I think she was invited, but said to +herself that she could not bear to go there and see another young woman +touching heads with her husband over an Italian book and making thrilling +hand-contacts with him accidentally. + +As remarked, he was a frequent visitor there, "where he found an easeful +resting-place in the house of Mrs. Boinville--the white-haired Maimuna-- +and of her daughter, Mrs. Turner." The aged Zonoras was deceased, but +the white-haired Maimuna was still on deck, as we see. "Three charming +ladies entertained the mocker (Hogg) with cups of tea, late hours, +Wieland's Agathon, sighs and smiles, and the celestial manna of refined +sentiment." + +"Such," says Hogg, "were the delights of Shelley's paradise in +Bracknell." + +The white-haired Maimuna presently writes to Hogg: + + "I will not have you despise home-spun pleasures. Shelley is + making a trial of them with us--" + +A trial of them. It may be called that. It was March 11, and he had +been in the house a month. She continues: + + Shelley "likes then so well that he is resolved to leave off + rambling--" + +But he has already left it off. He has been there a month. + + "And begin a course of them himself." + +But he has already begun it. He has been at it a month. He likes it so +well that he has forgotten all about his wife, as a letter of his +reveals. + + "Seriously, I think his mind and body want rest." + +Yet he has been resting both for a month, with Italian, and tea, and +manna of sentiment, and late hours, and every restful thing a young +husband could need for the refreshment of weary limbs and a sore +conscience, and a nagging sense of shabbiness and treachery. + + "His journeys after what he has never found have racked his + purse and his tranquillity. He is resolved to take a little + care of the former, in pity to the latter, which I applaud, and + shall second with all, my might." + +But she does not say whether the young wife, a stranger and lonely +yonder, wants another woman and her daughter Cornelia to be lavishing so +much inflamed interest on her husband or not. That young wife is always +silent--we are never allowed to hear from her. She must have opinions +about such things, she cannot be indifferent, she must be approving or +disapproving, surely she would speak if she were allowed--even to-day and +from her grave she would, if she could, I think--but we get only the +other side, they keep her silent always. + + "He has deeply interested us. In the course of your intimacy + he must have made you feel what we now feel for him. He is + seeking a house close to us--" + +Ah! he is not close enough yet, it seems-- + + "and if he succeeds we shall have an additional motive to + induce you to come among us in the summer." + +The reader would puzzle a long time and not guess the biographer's +comment upon the above letter. It is this: + + "These sound like words of s considerate and judicious friend." + +That is what he thinks. That is, it is what he thinks he thinks. No, +that is not quite it: it is what he thinks he can stupefy a particularly +and unspeakably dull reader into thinking it is what he thinks. He makes +that comment with the knowledge that Shelley is in love with this woman's +daughter, and that it is because of the fascinations of these two that +Shelley has deserted his wife--for this month, considering all the +circumstances, and his new passion, and his employment of the time, +amounted to desertion; that is its rightful name. We cannot know how the +wife regarded it and felt about it; but if she could have read the letter +which Shelley was writing to Hogg four or five days later, we could guess +her thought and how she felt. Hear him: + . . . . . . . + "I have been staying with Mrs. Boinville for the last month; + I have escaped, in the society of all that philosophy and + friendship combine, from the dismaying solitude of myself." + +It is fair to conjecture that he was feeling ashamed. + + "They have revived in my heart the expiring flame of life. + I have felt myself translated to a paradise which has nothing + of mortality but its transitoriness; my heart sickens at the + view of that necessity which will quickly divide me from the + delightful tranquillity of this happy home--for it has become + my home. + . . . . . . . + "Eliza is still with us--not here!--but will be with me when + the infinite malice of destiny forces me to depart." + +Eliza is she who blocked that game--the game in London--the one where we +were purposing to dine every night with one of the "three charming +ladies" who fed tea and manna and late hours to Hogg at Bracknell. + +Shelley could send Eliza away, of course; could have cleared her out long +ago if so minded, just as he had previously done with a predecessor of +hers whom he had first worshipped and then turned against; but perhaps +she was useful there as a thin excuse for staying away himself. + + "I am now but little inclined to contest this point. + I certainly hate her with all my heart and soul . . . . + + "It is a sight which awakens an inexpressible sensation of + disgust and horror, to see her caress my poor little Ianthe, + in whom I may hereafter find the consolation of sympathy. + I sometimes feel faint with the fatigue of checking the + overflowings of my unbounded abhorrence for this miserable + wretch. But she is no more than a blind and loathsome worm, + that cannot see to sting. + + "I have begun to learn Italian again . . . . Cornelia + assists me in this language. Did I not once tell you that I + thought her cold and reserved? She is the reverse of this, as + she is the reverse of everything bad. She inherits all the + divinity of her mother . . . . I have sometimes forgotten + that I am not an inmate of this delightful home--that a time + will come which will cast me again into the boundless ocean of + abhorred society. + + "I have written nothing but one stanza, which has no meaning, + and that I have only written in thought: + + "Thy dewy looks sink in my breast; + Thy gentle words stir poison there; + Thou hast disturbed the only rest + That was the portion of despair. + Subdued to duty's hard control, + I could have borne my wayward lot: + The chains that bind this rained soul + Had cankered then, but crushed it not. + + "This is the vision of a delirious and distempered dream, which + passes away at the cold clear light of morning. Its surpassing + excellence and exquisite perfections have no more reality than + the color of an autumnal sunset." + +Then it did not refer to his wife. That is plain; otherwise he would +have said so. It is well that he explained that it has no meaning, for +if he had not done that, the previous soft references to Cornelia and the +way he has come to feel about her now would make us think she was the +person who had inspired it while teaching him how to read the warm and +ruddy Italian poets during a month. + +The biography observes that portions of this letter "read like the tired +moaning of a wounded creature." Guesses at the nature of the wound are +permissible; we will hazard one. + +Read by the light of Shelley's previous history, his letter seems to be +the cry of a tortured conscience. Until this time it was a conscience +that had never felt a pang or known a smirch. It was the conscience of +one who, until this time, had never done a dishonorable thing, or an +ungenerous, or cruel, or treacherous thing, but was now doing all of +these, and was keenly aware of it. Up to this time Shelley had been +master of his nature, and it was a nature which was as beautiful and as +nearly perfect as any merely human nature may be. But he was drunk now, +with a debasing passion, and was not himself. There is nothing in his +previous history that is in character with the Shelley of this letter. +He had done boyish things, foolish things, even crazy things, but never +a thing to be ashamed of. He had done things which one might laugh at, +but the privilege of laughing was limited always to the thing itself; +you could not laugh at the motive back of it--that was high, that was +noble. His most fantastic and quixotic acts had a purpose back of them +which made them fine, often great, and made the rising laugh seem +profanation and quenched it; quenched it, and changed the impulse to +homage. + +Up to this time he had been loyalty itself, where his obligations lay-- +treachery was new to him; he had never done an ignoble thing--baseness +was new to him; he had never done an unkind thing that also was new to +him. + +This was the author of that letter, this was the man who had deserted his +young wife and was lamenting, because he must leave another woman's house +which had become a "home" to him, and go away. Is he lamenting mainly +because he must go back to his wife and child? No, the lament is mainly +for what he is to leave behind him. The physical comforts of the house? +No, in his life he had never attached importance to such things. Then +the thing which he grieves to leave is narrowed down to a person--to the +person whose "dewy looks" had sunk into his breast, and whose seducing +words had "stirred poison there." + +He was ashamed of himself, his conscience was upbraiding him. He was the +slave of a degrading love; he was drunk with his passion, the real +Shelley was in temporary eclipse. This is the verdict which his previous +history must certainly deliver upon this episode, I think. + +One must be allowed to assist himself with conjectures like these when +trying to find his way through a literary swamp which has so many +misleading finger-boards up as this book is furnished with. + +We have now arrived at a part of the swamp where the difficulties and +perplexities are going to be greater than any we have yet met with-- +where, indeed, the finger-boards are multitudinous, and the most of them +pointing diligently in the wrong direction. We are to be told by the +biography why Shelley deserted his wife and child and took up with +Cornelia Turner and Italian. It was not on account of Cornelia's sighs +and sentimentalities and tea and manna and late hours and soft and sweet +and industrious enticements; no, it was because "his happiness in his +home had been wounded and bruised almost to death." + +It had been wounded and bruised almost to death in this way: + +1st. Harriet persuaded him to set up a carriage. + +2d. After the intrusion of the baby, Harriet stopped reading aloud and +studying. + +3d. Harriet's walks with Hogg "commonly conducted us to some fashionable +bonnet-shop." + +4th. Harriet hired a wet-nurse. + +5th. When an operation was being performed upon the baby, "Harriet stood +by, narrowly observing all that was done, but, to the astonishment of the +operator, betraying not the smallest sign of emotion." + +6th. Eliza Westbrook, sister-in-law, was still of the household. + +The evidence against Harriet Shelley is all in; there is no more. Upon +these six counts she stands indicted of the crime of driving her husband +into that sty at Bracknell; and this crime, by these helps, the +biographical prosecuting attorney has set himself the task of proving +upon her. + +Does the biographer call himself the attorney for the prosecution? +No, only to himself, privately; publicly he is the passionless, +disinterested, impartial judge on the bench. He holds up his judicial +scales before the world, that all may see; and it all tries to look so +fair that a blind person would sometimes fail to see him slip the false +weights in. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, first, because Harriet had persuaded him to set up a carriage. +I cannot discover that any evidence is offered that she asked him to set +up a carriage. Still, if she did, was it a heavy offence? Was it +unique? Other young wives had committed it before, others have committed +it since. Shelley had dearly loved her in those London days; possibly he +set up the carriage gladly to please her; affectionate young husbands do +such things. When Shelley ran away with another girl, by-and-by, this +girl persuaded him to pour the price of many carriages and many horses +down the bottomless well of her father's debts, but this impartial judge +finds no fault with that. Once she appeals to Shelley to raise money-- +necessarily by borrowing, there was no other way--to pay her father's +debts with at a time when Shelley was in danger of being arrested and +imprisoned for his own debts; yet the good judge finds no fault with her +even for this. + +First and last, Shelley emptied into that rapacious mendicant's lap a sum +which cost him--for he borrowed it at ruinous rates--from eighty to one +hundred thousand dollars. But it was Mary Godwin's papa, the +supplications were often sent through Mary, the good judge is Mary's +strenuous friend, so Mary gets no censures. On the Continent Mary rode +in her private carriage, built, as Shelley boasts, "by one of the best +makers in Bond Street, "yet the good judge makes not even a passing +comment on this iniquity. Let us throw out Count No. 1 against Harriet +Shelley as being far-fetched, and frivolous. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, secondly, because Harriet's studies "had dwindled away to nothing, +Bysshe had ceased to express any interest in them." At what time was +this? It was when Harriet "had fully recovered from the fatigue of her +first effort of maternity,. . . and was now in full force, vigor, and +effect." Very well, the baby was born two days before the close of June. +It took the mother a month to get back her full force, vigor, and effect; +this brings us to July 27th and the deadly Cornelia. If a wife of +eighteen is studying with her husband and he gets smitten with another +woman, isn't he likely to lose interest in his wife's studies for that +reason, and is not his wife's interest in her studies likely to languish +for the same reason? Would not the mere sight of those books of hers +sharpen the pain that is in her heart? This sudden breaking down of a +mutual intellectual interest of two years' standing is coincident with +Shelley's re-encounter with Cornelia; and we are allowed to gather from +that time forth for nearly two months he did all his studying in that +person's society. We feel at liberty to rule out Count No. 2 from the +indictment against Harriet. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, thirdly, because Harriet's walks with Hogg commonly led to some +fashionable bonnet-shop. I offer no palliation; I only ask why the +dispassionate, impartial judge did not offer one himself--merely, I mean, +to offset his leniency in a similar case or two where the girl who ran +away with Harriet's husband was the shopper. There are several occasions +where she interested herself with shopping--among them being walks which +ended at the bonnet-shop--yet in none of these cases does she get a word +of blame from the good judge, while in one of them he covers the deed +with a justifying remark, she doing the shopping that time to find +easement for her mind, her child having died. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fourthly, by the introduction there of a wet-nurse. The wet-nurse +was introduced at the time of the Edinburgh sojourn, immediately after +Shelley had been enjoying the two months of study with Cornelia which +broke up his wife's studies and destroyed his personal interest in them. +Why, by this time, nothing that Shelley's wife could do would have been +satisfactory to him, for he was in love with another woman, and was never +going to be contented again until he got back to her. If he had been +still in love with his wife it is not easily conceivable that he would +care much who nursed the baby, provided the baby was well nursed. +Harriet's jealousy was assuredly voicing itself now, Shelley's conscience +was assuredly nagging him, pestering him, persecuting him. Shelley +needed excuses for his altered attitude towards his wife; Providence +pitied him and sent the wet-nurse. If Providence had sent him a cotton +doughnut it would have answered just as well; all he wanted was something +to find fault with. + +Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and bruised almost to +death, fifthly, because Harriet narrowly watched a surgical operation +which was being performed upon her child, and, "to the astonishment of +the operator," who was watching Harriet instead of attending to his +operation, she betrayed "not the smallest sign of emotion." The author +of this biography was not ashamed to set down that exultant slander. +He was apparently not aware that it was a small business to bring into +his court a witness whose name he does not know, and whose character and +veracity there is none to vouch for, and allow him to strike this blow at +the mother-heart of this friendless girl. The biographer says, "We may +not infer from this that Harriet did not feel"--why put it in, then?-- +"but we learn that those about her could believe her to be hard and +insensible." Who were those who were about her? Her husband? He hated +her now, because he was in love elsewhere. Her sister? Of course that +is not charged. Peacock? Peacock does not testify. The wet-nurse? She +does not testify. If any others were there we have no mention of them. +"Those about her" are reduced to one person--her husband. Who reports +the circumstance? It is Hogg. Perhaps he was there--we do not know. +But if he was, he still got his information at second-hand, as it was the +operator who noticed Harriet's lack of emotion, not himself. Hogg is not +given to saying kind things when Harriet is his subject. He may have +said them the time that he tried to tempt her to soil her honor, but +after that he mentions her usually with a sneer. "Among those who were +about her" was one witness well equipped to silence all tongues, abolish +all doubts, set our minds at rest; one witness, not called, and not +callable, whose evidence, if we could but get it, would outweigh the +oaths of whole battalions of hostile Hoggs and nameless surgeons--the +baby. I wish we had the baby's testimony; and yet if we had it it would +not do us any good--a furtive conjecture, a sly insinuation, a pious +"if" or two, would be smuggled in, here and there, with a solemn air of +judicial investigation, and its positiveness would wilt into dubiety. + +The biographer says of Harriet, "If words of tender affection and +motherly pride proved the reality of love, then undoubtedly she loved her +firstborn child." That is, if mere empty words can prove it, it stands +proved--and in this way, without committing himself, he gives the reader +a chance to infer that there isn't any extant evidence but words, and +that he doesn't take much stock in them. How seldom he shows his hand! +He is always lurking behind a non-committal "if" or something of that +kind; always gliding and dodging around, distributing colorless poison +here and there and everywhere, but always leaving himself in a position +to say that his language will be found innocuous if taken to pieces and +examined. He clearly exhibits a steady and never-relaxing purpose to +make Harriet the scapegoat for her husband's first great sin--but it is +in the general view that this is revealed, not in the details. His +insidious literature is like blue water; you know what it is that makes +it blue, but you cannot produce and verify any detail of the cloud of +microscopic dust in it that does it. Your adversary can dip up a +glassful and show you that it is pure white and you cannot deny it; and +he can dip the lake dry, glass by glass, and show that every glassful is +white, and prove it to any one's eye--and yet that lake was blue and you +can swear it. This book is blue--with slander in solution. + +Let the reader examine, for example, the paragraph of comment which +immediately follows the letter containing Shelley's self-exposure which +we have been considering. This is it. One should inspect the individual +sentences as they go by, then pass them in procession and review the +cake-walk as a whole: + + "Shelley's happiness in his home, as is evident from this + pathetic letter, had been fatally stricken; it is evident, + also, that he knew where duty lay; he felt that his part was to + take up his burden, silently and sorrowfully, and to bear it + henceforth with the quietness of despair. But we can perceive + that he scarcely possessed the strength and fortitude needful + for success in such an attempt. And clearly Shelley himself + was aware how perilous it was to accept that respite of + blissful ease which he enjoyed in the Boinville household; for + gentle voices and dewy looks and words of sympathy could not + fail to remind him of an ideal of tranquillity or of joy which + could never be his, and which he must henceforth sternly + exclude from his imagination." + +That paragraph commits the author in no way. Taken sentence by sentence +it asserts nothing against anybody or in favor of anybody, pleads for +nobody, accuses nobody. Taken detail by detail, it is as innocent as +moonshine. And yet, taken as a whole, it is a design against the reader; +its intent is to remove the feeling which the letter must leave with him +if let alone, and put a different one in its place--to remove a feeling +justified by the letter and substitute one not justified by it. The +letter itself gives you no uncertain picture--no lecturer is needed to +stand by with a stick and point out its details and let on to explain +what they mean. The picture is the very clear and remorsefully faithful +picture of a fallen and fettered angel who is ashamed of himself; an +angel who beats his soiled wings and cries, who complains to the woman +who enticed him that he could have borne his wayward lot, he could have +stood by his duty if it had not been for her beguilements; an angel who +rails at the "boundless ocean of abhorred society," and rages at his poor +judicious sister-in-law. If there is any dignity about this spectacle it +will escape most people. + +Yet when the paragraph of comment is taken as a whole, the picture is +full of dignity and pathos; we have before us a blameless and noble +spirit stricken to the earth by malign powers, but not conquered; +tempted, but grandly putting the temptation away; enmeshed by subtle +coils, but sternly resolved to rend them and march forth victorious, at +any peril of life or limb. Curtain--slow music. + +Was it the purpose of the paragraph to take the bad taste of Shelley's +letter out of the reader's mouth? If that was not it, good ink was +wasted; without that, it has no relevancy--the multiplication table would +have padded the space as rationally. + +We have inspected the six reasons which we are asked to believe drove a +man of conspicuous patience, honor, justice, fairness, kindliness, and +iron firmness, resolution, and steadfastness, from the wife whom he loved +and who loved him, to a refuge in the mephitic paradise of Bracknell. +These are six infinitely little reasons; but there were six colossal +ones, and these the counsel for the destruction of Harriet Shelley +persists in not considering very important. + +Moreover, the colossal six preceded the little six and had done the +mischief before they were born. Let us double-column the twelve; then we +shall see at a glance that each little reason is in turn answered by a +retorting reason of a size to overshadow it and make it insignificant: + +1. Harriet sets up carriage. 1. CORNELIA TURNER. +2. Harriet stops studying. 2. CORNELIA TURNER. +3. Harriet goes to bonnet-shop. 3. CORNELIA TURNER. +4. Harriet takes a wet-nurse. 4. CORNELIA TURNER. +5. Harriet has too much nerve. 5. CORNELIA TURNER. +6. Detested sister-in-law 6. CORNELIA TURNER. + +As soon as we comprehend that Cornelia Turner and the Italian lessons +happened before the little six had been discovered to be grievances, +we understand why Shelley's happiness in his home had been wounded and +bruised almost to death, and no one can persuade us into laying it on +Harriet. Shelley and Cornelia are the responsible persons, and we cannot +in honor and decency allow the cruelties which they practised upon the +unoffending wife to be pushed aside in order to give us a chance to waste +time and tears over six sentimental justifications of an offence which +the six can't justify, nor even respectably assist in justifying. + +Six? There were seven; but in charity to the biographer the seventh +ought not to be exposed. Still, he hung it out himself, and not only +hung it out, but thought it was a good point in Shelley's favor. For two +years Shelley found sympathy and intellectual food and all that at home; +there was enough for spiritual and mental support, but not enough for +luxury; and so, at the end of the contented two years, this latter detail +justifies him in going bag and baggage over to Cornelia Turner and +supplying the rest of his need in the way of surplus sympathy and +intellectual pie unlawfully. By the same reasoning a man in merely +comfortable circumstances may rob a bank without sin. + + +III + +It is 1814, it is the 16th of March, Shelley has, written his letter, he +has been in the Boinville paradise a month, his deserted wife is in her +husbandless home. Mischief had been wrought. It is the biographer who +concedes this. We greatly need some light on Harriet's side of the case +now; we need to know how she enjoyed the month, but there is no way to +inform ourselves; there seems to be a strange absence of documents and +letters and diaries on that side. Shelley kept a diary, the approaching +Mary Godwin kept a diary, her father kept one, her half-sister by +marriage, adoption, and the dispensation of God kept one, and the entire +tribe and all its friends wrote and received letters, and the letters +were kept and are producible when this biography needs them; but there +are only three or four scraps of Harriet's writing, and no diary. +Harriet wrote plenty of letters to her husband--nobody knows where they +are, I suppose; she wrote plenty of letters to other people--apparently +they have disappeared, too. Peacock says she wrote good letters, but +apparently interested people had sagacity enough to mislay them in time. +After all her industry she went down into her grave and lies silent +there--silent, when she has so much need to speak. We can only wonder at +this mystery, not account for it. + +No, there is no way of finding out what Harriet's state of feeling was +during the month that Shelley was disporting himself in the Bracknell +paradise. We have to fall back upon conjecture, as our fabulist does +when he has nothing more substantial to work with. Then we easily +conjecture that as the days dragged by Harriet's heart grew heavier and +heavier under its two burdens--shame and resentment: the shame of being +pointed at and gossiped about as a deserted wife, and resentment against +the woman who had beguiled her husband from her and now kept him in a +disreputable captivity. Deserted wives--deserted whether for cause or +without cause--find small charity among the virtuous and the discreet. +We conjecture that one after another the neighbors ceased to call; that +one after another they got to being "engaged" when Harriet called; that +finally they one after the other cut her dead on the street; that after +that she stayed in the house daytimes, and brooded over her sorrows, and +nighttimes did the same, there being nothing else to do with the heavy +hours and the silence and solitude and the dreary intervals which sleep +should have charitably bridged, but didn't. + +Yes, mischief had been wrought. The biographer arrives at this +conclusion, and it is a most just one. Then, just as you begin to half +hope he is going to discover the cause of it and launch hot bolts of +wrath at the guilty manufacturers of it, you have to turn away +disappointed. You are disappointed, and you sigh. This is what he says +--the italics [''] are mine: + + "However the mischief may have been wrought--'and at this day + no one can wish to heap blame an any buried head'--" + +So it is poor Harriet, after all. Stern justice must take its course-- +justice tempered with delicacy, justice tempered with compassion, justice +that pities a forlorn dead girl and refuses to strike her. Except in the +back. Will not be ignoble and say the harsh thing, but only insinuate +it. Stern justice knows about the carriage and the wet-nurse and the +bonnet-shop and the other dark things that caused this sad mischief, and +may not, must not blink them; so it delivers judgment where judgment +belongs, but softens the blow by not seeming to deliver judgment at all. +To resume--the italics are mine: + + "However the mischief may have been wrought--and at this day no + one can wish to heap blame on any buried head--'it is certain + that some cause or causes of deep division between Shelley and + his wife were in operation during the early part of the year + 1814'." + +This shows penetration. No deduction could be more accurate than this. +There were indeed some causes of deep division. But next comes another +disappointing sentence: + + "To guess at the precise nature of these cafes, in the absence + of definite statement, were useless." + +Why, he has already been guessing at them for several pages, and we have +been trying to outguess him, and now all of a sudden he is tired of it +and won't play any more. It is not quite fair to us. However, he will +get over this by-and-by, when Shelley commits his next indiscretion and +has to be guessed out of it at Harriet's expense. + +"We may rest content with Shelley's own words"--in a Chancery paper drawn +up by him three years later. They were these: "Delicacy forbids me to +say more than that we were disunited by incurable dissensions." + +As for me, I do not quite see why we should rest content with anything of +the sort. It is not a very definite statement. It does not necessarily +mean anything more than that he did not wish to go into the tedious +details of those family quarrels. Delicacy could quite properly excuse +him from saying, "I was in love with Cornelia all that time; my wife kept +crying and worrying about it and upbraiding me and begging me to cut +myself free from a connection which was wronging her and disgracing us +both; and I being stung by these reproaches retorted with fierce and +bitter speeches--for it is my nature to do that when I am stirred, +especially if the target of them is a person whom I had greatly loved and +respected before, as witness my various attitudes towards Miss Hitchener, +the Gisbornes, Harriet's sister, and others--and finally I did not +improve this state of things when I deserted my wife and spent a whole +month with the woman who had infatuated me." + +No, he could not go into those details, and we excuse him; but, +nevertheless, we do not rest content with this bland proposition to puff +away that whole long disreputable episode with a single mean, meaningless +remark of Shelley's. + +We do admit that "it is certain that some cause or causes of deep +division were in operation." We would admit it just the same if the +grammar of the statement were as straight as a string, for we drift into +pretty indifferent grammar ourselves when we are absorbed in historical +work; but we have to decline to admit that we cannot guess those cause or +causes. + +But guessing is not really necessary. There is evidence attainable-- +evidence from the batch discredited by the biographer and set out at the +back door in his appendix-basket; and yet a court of law would think +twice before throwing it out, whereas it would be a hardy person who +would venture to offer in such a place a good part of the material which +is placed before the readers of this book as "evidence," and so treated +by this daring biographer. Among some letters (in the appendix-basket) +from Mrs. Godwin, detailing the Godwinian share in the Shelleyan events +of 1814, she tells how Harriet Shelley came to her and her husband, +agitated and weeping, to implore them to forbid Shelley the house, and +prevent his seeing Mary Godwin. + + "She related that last November he had fallen in love with Mrs. + Turner and paid her such marked attentions Mr. Turner, the + husband, had carried off his wife to Devonshire." + +The biographer finds a technical fault in this; "the Shelleys were in +Edinburgh in November." What of that? The woman is recalling a +conversation which is more than two months old; besides, she was probably +more intent upon the central and important fact of it than upon its +unimportant date. Harriet's quoted statement has some sense in it; for +that reason, if for no other, it ought to have been put in the body of +the book. Still, that would not have answered; even the biographer's +enemy could not be cruel enough to ask him to let this real grievance, +this compact and substantial and picturesque figure, this rawhead-and- +bloody-bones, come striding in there among those pale shams, those +rickety spectres labeled WET-NURSE, BONNET-SHOP, and so on--no, the +father of all malice could not ask the biographer to expose his pathetic +goblins to a competition like that. + +The fabulist finds fault with the statement because it has a technical +error in it; and he does this at the moment that he is furnishing us an +error himself, and of a graver sort. He says: + + "If Turner carried off his wife to Devonshire he brought her + back and Shelley was staying with her and her mother on terms + of cordial intimacy in March, 1814." + +We accept the "cordial intimacy"--it was the very thing Harriet was +complaining of--but there is nothing to show that it was Turner who +brought his wife back. The statement is thrown in as if it were not only +true, but was proof that Turner was not uneasy. Turner's movements are +proof of nothing. Nothing but a statement from Turner's mouth would have +any value here, and he made none. + +Six days after writing his letter Shelley and his wife were together +again for a moment--to get remarried according to the rites of the +English Church. + +Within three weeks the new husband and wife were apart again, and the +former was back in his odorous paradise. This time it is the wife who +does the deserting. She finds Cornelia too strong for her, probably. +At any rate, she goes away with her baby and sister, and we have a +playful fling at her from good Mrs. Boinville, the "mysterious spinner +Maimuna"; she whose "face was as a damsel's face, and yet her hair was +gray"; she of whom the biographer has said, "Shelley was indeed caught in +an almost invisible thread spun around him, but unconsciously, by this +subtle and benignant enchantress." The subtle and benignant enchantress +writes to Hogg, April 18: "Shelley is again a widower; his beauteous half +went to town on Thursday." + +Then Shelley writes a poem--a chant of grief over the hard fate which +obliges him now to leave his paradise and take up with his wife again. +It seems to intimate that the paradise is cooling towards him; that he is +warned off by acclamation; that he must not even venture to tempt with +one last tear his friend Cornelia's ungentle mood, for her eye is glazed +and cold and dares not entreat her lover to stay: + +Exhibit E + + "Pause not! the time is past! Every voice cries 'Away!' + Tempt not with one last tear thy friend's ungentle mood; + Thy lover's eye, so glazed and cold, dares not entreat thy + stay: + Duty and dereliction guide thee back to solitude." + +Back to the solitude of his now empty home, that is! + + "Away! away! to thy sad and silent home; + Pour bitter tears on its desolated hearth." + . . . . . . . . + +But he will have rest in the grave by-and-by. Until that time comes, +the charms of Bracknell will remain in his memory, along with Mrs. +Boinville's voice and Cornelia Turner's smile: + + "Thou in the grave shalt rest--yet, till the phantoms flee + Which that house and hearth and garden made dear to thee ere while, + Thy remembrance and repentance and deep musings are not free + From the music of two voices and the light of one sweet smile." + +We cannot wonder that Harriet could not stand it. Any of us would have +left. We would not even stay with a cat that was in this condition. +Even the Boinvilles could not endure it; and so, as we have seen, they +gave this one notice. + + "Early in May, Shelley was in London. He did not yet despair + of reconciliation with Harriet, nor had he ceased to love her." + +Shelley's poems are a good deal of trouble to his biographer. They are +constantly inserted as "evidence," and they make much confusion. As soon +as one of them has proved one thing, another one follows and proves quite +a different thing. The poem just quoted shows that he was in love with +Cornelia, but a month later he is in love with Harriet again, and there +is a poem to prove it. + + "In this piteous appeal Shelley declares that he has now no + grief but one--the grief of having known and lost his wife's + love." + +Exhibit F + + "Thy look of love has power to calm + The stormiest passion of my soul." + + +But without doubt she had been reserving her looks of love a good part of +the time for ten months, now--ever since he began to lavish his own on +Cornelia Turner at the end of the previous July. He does really seem to +have already forgotten Cornelia's merits in one brief month, for he +eulogizes Harriet in a way which rules all competition out: + + "Thou only virtuous, gentle, kind, + Amid a world of hate." + +He complains of her hardness, and begs her to make the concession of +a "slight endurance"--of his waywardness, perhaps--for the sake of +"a fellow-being's lasting weal." But the main force of his appeal is +in his closing stanza, and is strongly worded: + + "O tract for once no erring guide! + Bid the remorseless feeling flee; + 'Tis malice, 'tis revenge, 'tis pride, + 'Tis anything but thee; + I deign a nobler pride to prove, + And pity if thou canst not love." + +This is in May--apparently towards the end of it. Harriet and Shelley +were corresponding all the time. Harriet got the poem--a copy exists in +her own handwriting; she being the only gentle and kind person amid a +world of hate, according to Shelley's own testimony in the poem, we are +permitted to think that the daily letters would presently have melted +that kind and gentle heart and brought about the reconciliation, if there +had been time but there wasn't; for in a very few days--in fact, before +the 8th of June--Shelley was in love with another woman. + +And so--perhaps while Harriet was walking the floor nights, trying to get +her poem by heart--her husband was doing a fresh one--for the other girl +--Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin--with sentiments like these in it: + +Exhibit G + + To spend years thus and be rewarded, + As thou, sweet love, requited me + When none were near. + . . . thy lips did meet + Mine tremblingly; . . , + + " Gentle and good and mild thou art, + Nor can I live if thou appear + Aught but thyself." . . . + + +And so on. "Before the close of June it was known and felt by Mary and +Shelley that each was inexpressibly dear to the other." Yes, Shelley had +found this child of sixteen to his liking, and had wooed and won her in +the graveyard. But that is nothing; it was better than wooing her in her +nursery, at any rate, where it might have disturbed the other children. + +However, she was a child in years only. From the day that she set her +masculine grip on Shelley he was to frisk no more. If she had occupied +the only kind and gentle Harriet's place in March it would have been a +thrilling spectacle to see her invade the Boinville rookery and read the +riot act. That holiday of Shelley's would have been of short duration, +and Cornelia's hair would have been as gray as her mother's when the +services were over. + +Hogg went to the Godwin residence in Skinner Street with Shelley on that +8th of June. They passed through Godwin's little debt-factory of a book- +shop and went up-stairs hunting for the proprietor. Nobody there. +Shelley strode about the room impatiently, making its crazy floor quake +under him. Then a door "was partially and softly opened. A thrilling +voice called 'Shelley!' A thrilling voice answered, 'Mary!' And he +darted out of the room like an arrow from the bow of the far-shooting +King. A very young female, fair and fair-haired, pale, indeed, and with +a piercing look, wearing a frock of tartan, an unusual dress in London at +that time, had called him out of the room." + +This is Mary Godwin, as described by Hogg. The thrill of the voices +shows that the love of Shelley and Mary was already upward of a fortnight +old; therefore it had been born within the month of May--born while +Harriet was still trying to get her poem by heart, we think. I must not +be asked how I know so much about that thrill; it is my secret. The +biographer and I have private ways of finding out things when it is +necessary to find them out and the customary methods fail. + +Shelley left London that day, and was gone ten days. The biographer +conjectures that he spent this interval with Harriet in Bath. It would +be just like him. To the end of his days he liked to be in love with two +women at once. He was more in love with Miss Hitchener when he married +Harriet than he was with Harriet, and told the lady so with simple and +unostentatious candor. He was more in love with Cornelia than he was +with Harriet in the end of 1813 and the beginning of 1814, yet he +supplied both of them with love poems of an equal temperature meantime; +he loved Mary and Harriet in June, and while getting ready to run off +with the one, it is conjectured that he put in his odd time trying to get +reconciled to the other; by-and-by, while still in love with Mary, he +will make love to her half-sister by marriage, adoption, and the +visitation of God, through the medium of clandestine letters, and she +will answer with letters that are for no eye but his own. + +When Shelley encountered Mary Godwin he was looking around for another +paradise. He had, tastes of his own, and there were features about the +Godwin establishment that strongly recommended it. Godwin was an +advanced thinker and an able writer. One of his romances is still read, +but his philosophical works, once so esteemed, are out of vogue now; +their authority was already declining when Shelley made his acquaintance +--that is, it was declining with the public, but not with Shelley. They +had been his moral and political Bible, and they were that yet. Shelley +the infidel would himself have claimed to be less a work of God than a +work of Godwin. Godwin's philosophies had formed his mind and interwoven +themselves into it and become a part of its texture; he regarded himself +as Godwin's spiritual son. Godwin was not without self-appreciation; +indeed, it may be conjectured that from his point of view the last +syllable of his name was surplusage. He lived serene in his lofty world +of philosophy, far above the mean interests that absorbed smaller men, +and only came down to the ground at intervals to pass the hat for alms to +pay his debts with, and insult the man that relieved him. Several of his +principles were out of the ordinary. For example, he was opposed to +marriage. He was not aware that his preachings from this text were but +theory and wind; he supposed he was in earnest in imploring people to +live together without marrying, until Shelley furnished him a working +model of his scheme and a practical example to analyze, by applying the +principle in his own family; the matter took a different and surprising +aspect then. The late Matthew Arnold said that the main defect in +Shelley's make-up was that he was destitute of the sense of humor. This +episode must have escaped Mr. Arnold's attention. + +But we have said enough about the head of the new paradise. Mrs. Godwin +is described as being in several ways a terror; and even when her soul +was in repose she wore green spectacles. But I suspect that her main +unattractiveness was born of the fact that she wrote the letters that are +out in the appendix-basket in the back yard--letters which are an outrage +and wholly untrustworthy, for they say some kind things about poor +Harriet and tell some disagreeable truths about her husband; and these +things make the fabulist grit his teeth a good deal. + +Next we have Fanny Godwin--a Godwin by courtesy only; she was Mrs. +Godwin's natural daughter by a former friend. She was a sweet and +winning girl, but she presently wearied of the Godwin paradise, and +poisoned herself. + +Last in the list is Jane (or Claire, as she preferred to call herself) +Clairmont, daughter of Mrs. Godwin by a former marriage. She was very +young and pretty and accommodating, and always ready to do what she could +to make things pleasant. After Shelley ran off with her part-sister +Mary, she became the guest of the pair, and contributed a natural child +to their nursery--Allegra. Lord Byron was the father. + +We have named the several members and advantages of the new paradise in +Skinner Street, with its crazy book-shop underneath. Shelley was all +right now, this was a better place than the other; more variety anyway, +and more different kinds of fragrance. One could turn out poetry here +without any trouble at all. + +The way the new love-match came about was this: + +Shelley told Mary all his aggravations and sorrows and griefs, and about +the wet-nurse and the bonnetshop and the surgeon and the carriage, and +the sister-in-law that blocked the London game, and about Cornelia and +her mamma, and how they had turned him out of the house after making so +much of him; and how he had deserted Harriet and then Harriet had +deserted him, and how the reconciliation was working along and Harriet +getting her poem by heart; and still he was not happy, and Mary pitied +him, for she had had trouble herself. But I am not satisfied with this. +It reads too much like statistics. It lacks smoothness and grace, and is +too earthy and business-like. It has the sordid look of a trades-union +procession out on strike. That is not the right form for it. The book +does it better; we will fall back on the book and have a cake-walk: + + "It was easy to divine that some restless grief possessed him; + Mary herself was not unlearned in the lore of pain. His + generous zeal in her father's behalf, his spiritual sonship to + Godwin, his reverence for her mother's memory, were guarantees + with Mary of his excellence.--[What she was after was + guarantees of his excellence. That he stood ready to desert + his wife and child was one of them, apparently.]--The new + friends could not lack subjects of discourse, and underneath + their words about Mary's mother, and 'Political Justice,' and + 'Rights of Woman,' were two young hearts, each feeling towards + the other, each perhaps unaware, trembling in the direction of + the other. The desire to assuage the suffering of one whose + happiness has grown precious to us may become a hunger of the + spirit as keen as any other, and this hunger now possessed + Mary's heart; when her eyes rested unseen on Shelley, it was + with a look full of the ardor of a 'soothing pity.'" + +Yes, that is better and has more composure. That is just the way it +happened. He told her about the wet-nurse, she told him about political +justice; he told her about the deadly sister-in-law, she told him about +her mother; he told her about the bonnet-shop, she murmured back about +the rights of woman; then he assuaged her, then she assuaged him; then he +assuaged her some more, next she assuaged him some more; then they both +assuaged one another simultaneously; and so they went on by the hour +assuaging and assuaging and assuaging, until at last what was the result? +They were in love. It will happen so every time. + + "He had married a woman who, as he now persuaded himself, had + never truly loved him, who loved only his fortune and his rank, + and who proved her selfishness by deserting him in his misery." + +I think that that is not quite fair to Harriet. We have no certainty +that she knew Cornelia had turned him out of the house. He went back to +Cornelia, and Harriet may have supposed that he was as happy with her as +ever. Still, it was judicious to begin to lay on the whitewash, for +Shelley is going to need many a coat of it now, and the sooner the reader +becomes used to the intrusion of the brush the sooner he will get +reconciled to it and stop fretting about it. + +After Shelley's (conjectured) visit to Harriet at Bath--8th of June to +18th--"it seems to have been arranged that Shelley should henceforth +join the Skinner Street household each day at dinner." + +Nothing could be handier than this; things will swim along now. + + "Although now Shelley was coming to believe that his wedded + union with Harriet was a thing of the past, he had not ceased + to regard her with affectionate consideration; he wrote to her + frequently, and kept her informed of his whereabouts." + +We must not get impatient over these curious inharmoniousnesses and +irreconcilabilities in Shelley's character. You can see by the +biographer's attitude towards them that there is nothing objectionable +about them. Shelley was doing his best to make two adoring young +creatures happy: he was regarding the one with affectionate consideration +by mail, and he was assuaging the other one at home. + + "Unhappy Harriet, residing at Bath, had perhaps never desired + that the breach between herself and her husband should be + irreparable and complete." + +I find no fault with that sentence except that the "perhaps" is not +strictly warranted. It should have been left out. In support--or shall +we say extenuation?--of this opinion I submit that there is not +sufficient evidence to warrant the uncertainty which it implies. The +only "evidence" offered that Harriet was hard and proud and standing out +against a reconciliation is a poem--the poem in which Shelley beseeches +her to "bid the remorseless feeling flee" and "pity" if she "cannot +love." We have just that as "evidence," and out of its meagre materials +the biographer builds a cobhouse of conjectures as big as the Coliseum; +conjectures which convince him, the prosecuting attorney, but ought to +fall far short of convincing any fair-minded jury. + +Shelley's love-poems may be very good evidence, but we know well that +they are "good for this day and train only." We are able to believe that +they spoke the truth for that one day, but we know by experience that +they could not be depended on to speak it the next. The very +supplication for a rewarming of Harriet's chilled love was followed so +suddenly by the poet's plunge into an adoring passion for Mary Godwin +that if it had been a check it would have lost its value before a lazy +person could have gotten to the bank with it. + +Hardness, stubbornness, pride, vindictiveness--these may sometimes reside +in a young wife and mother of nineteen, but they are not charged against +Harriet Shelley outside of that poem, and one has no right to insert them +into her character on such shadowy "evidence" as that. Peacock knew +Harriet well, and she has a flexible and persuadable look, as painted by +him: + + "Her manners were good, and her whole aspect and demeanor such + manifest emanations of pure and truthful nature that to be once + in her company was to know her thoroughly. She was fond of her + husband, and accommodated herself in every way to his tastes. + If they mixed in society, she adorned it; if they lived in + retirement, she was satisfied; if they travelled, she enjoyed + the change of scene." + +"Perhaps" she had never desired that the breach should be irreparable and +complete. The truth is, we do not even know that there was any breach at +all at this time. We know that the husband and wife went before the +altar and took a new oath on the 24th of March to love and cherish each +other until death--and this may be regarded as a sort of reconciliation +itself, and a wiping out of the old grudges. Then Harriet went away, and +the sister-in-law removed herself from her society. That was in April. +Shelley wrote his "appeal" in May, but the corresponding went right along +afterwards. We have a right to doubt that the subject of it was a +"reconciliation," or that Harriet had any suspicion that she needed to be +reconciled and that her husband was trying to persuade her to it--as the +biographer has sought to make us believe, with his Coliseum of +conjectures built out of a waste-basket of poetry. For we have +"evidence" now--not poetry and conjecture. When Shelley had been dining +daily in the Skinner Street paradise fifteen days and continuing the +love-match which was already a fortnight old twenty-five days earlier, +he forgot to write Harriet; forgot it the next day and the next. During +four days Harriet got no letter from him. Then her fright and anxiety +rose to expression-heat, and she wrote a letter to Shelley's publisher +which seems to reveal to us that Shelley's letters to her had been the +customary affectionate letters of husband to wife, and had carried no +appeals for reconciliation and had not needed to: + + "BATH (postmark July 7, 1814). + "MY DEAR SIR,--You will greatly oblige me by giving the + enclosed to Mr. Shelley. I would not trouble you, but it is + now four days since I have heard from him, which to me is an + age. Will you write by return of post and tell me what has + become of him? as I always fancy something dreadful has + happened if I do not hear from him. If you tell me that he is + well I shall not come to London, but if I do not hear from you + or him I shall certainly come, as I cannot endure this dreadful + state of suspense. You are his friend and you can feel for me. + "I remain yours truly, + "H. S." + + +Even without Peacock's testimony that "her whole aspect and demeanor were +manifest emanations of a pure and truthful nature," we should hold this +to be a truthful letter, a sincere letter, a loving letter; it bears +those marks; I think it is also the letter of a person accustomed to +receiving letters from her husband frequently, and that they have been of +a welcome and satisfactory sort, too, this long time back--ever since the +solemn remarriage and reconciliation at the altar most likely. + +The biographer follows Harriet's letter with a conjecture. +He conjectures that she "would now gladly have retraced her steps." +Which means that it is proven that she had steps to retrace--proven by +the poem. Well, if the poem is better evidence than the letter, we must +let it stand at that. + +Then the biographer attacks Harriet Shelley's honor--by authority of +random and unverified gossip scavengered from a group of people whose +very names make a person shudder: Mary Godwin, mistress to Shelley; her +part-sister, discarded mistress of Lord Byron; Godwin, the philosophical +tramp, who gathers his share of it from a shadow--that is to say, from a +person whom he shirks out of naming. Yet the biographer dignifies this +sorry rubbish with the name of "evidence." + +Nothing remotely resembling a distinct charge from a named person +professing to know is offered among this precious "evidence." + +1. "Shelley believed" so and so. + +2. Byron's discarded mistress says that Shelley told Mary Godwin so and +so, and Mary told her. + +3. "Shelley said" so and so--and later "admitted over and over again +that he had been in error." + +4. The unspeakable Godwin "wrote to Mr. Baxter" that he knew so and so +"from unquestionable authority"--name not furnished. + +How-any man in his right mind could bring himself to defile the grave of +a shamefully abused and defenceless girl with these baseless +fabrications, this manufactured filth, is inconceivable. How any man, in +his right mind or out of it, could sit down and coldly try to persuade +anybody to believe it, or listen patiently to it, or, indeed, do anything +but scoff at it and deride it, is astonishing. + +The charge insinuated by these odious slanders is one of the most +difficult of all offences to prove; it is also one which no man has a +right to mention even in a whisper about any woman, living or dead, +unless he knows it to be true, and not even then unless he can also prove +it to be true. There is no justification for the abomination of putting +this stuff in the book. + +Against Harriet Shelley's good name there is not one scrap of tarnishing +evidence, and not even a scrap of evil gossip, that comes from a source +that entitles it to a hearing. + +On the credit side of the account we have strong opinions from the people +who knew her best. Peacock says: + + "I feel it due to the memory of Harriet to state my most + decided conviction that her conduct as a wife was as pure, as + true, as absolutely faultless, as that of any who for such + conduct are held most in honor." + +Thornton Hunt, who had picked and published slight flaws in Harriet's +character, says, as regards this alleged large one: + + "There is not a trace of evidence or a whisper of scandal + against her before her voluntary departure from Shelley." + +Trelawney says: + + "I was assured by the evidence of the few friends who knew both + Shelley and his wife--Hookham, Hogg, Peacock, and one of the + Godwins--that Harriet was perfectly innocent of all offence." + +What excuse was there for raking up a parcel of foul rumors from +malicious and discredited sources and flinging them at this dead girl's +head? Her very defencelessness should have been her protection. The +fact that all letters to her or about her, with almost every scrap of her +own writing, had been diligently mislaid, leaving her case destitute of a +voice, while every pen-stroke which could help her husband's side had +been as diligently preserved, should have excused her from being brought +to trial. Her witnesses have all disappeared, yet we see her summoned in +her grave-clothes to plead for the life of her character, without the +help of an advocate, before a disqualified judge and a packed jury. + +Harriet Shelley wrote her distressed letter on the 7th of July. On the +28th her husband ran away with Mary Godwin and her part-sister Claire to +the Continent. He deserted his wife when her confinement was +approaching. She bore him a child at the end of November, his mistress +bore him another one something over two months later. The truants were +back in London before either of these events occurred. + +On one occasion, presently, Shelley was so pressed for money to support +his mistress with that he went to his wife and got some money of his that +was in her hands--twenty pounds. Yet the mistress was not moved to +gratitude; for later, when the wife was troubled to meet her engagements, +the mistress makes this entry in her diary: + + "Harriet sends her creditors here; nasty woman. Now we shall + have to change our lodgings." + +The deserted wife bore the bitterness and obloquy of her situation two +years and a quarter; then she gave up, and drowned herself. A month +afterwards the body was found in the water. Three weeks later Shelley +married his mistress. + +I must here be allowed to italicize a remark of the biographer's +concerning Harriet Shelley: + + "That no act of Shelley's during the two years which + immediately preceded her death tended to cause the rash act + which brought her life to its close seems certain." + +Yet her husband had deserted her and her children, and was living with a +concubine all that time! Why should a person attempt to write biography +when the simplest facts have no meaning to him? This book is littered +with as crass stupidities as that one--deductions by the page which bear +no discoverable kinship to their premises. + +The biographer throws off that extraordinary remark without any +perceptible disturbance to his serenity; for he follows it with a +sentimental justification of Shelley's conduct which has not a pang of +conscience in it, but is silky and smooth and undulating and pious-- +a cake-walk with all the colored brethren at their best. There may be +people who can read that page and keep their temper, but it is doubtful. +Shelley's life has the one indelible blot upon it, but is otherwise +worshipfully noble and beautiful. It even stands out indestructibly +gracious and lovely from the ruck of these disastrous pages, in spite of +the fact that they expose and establish his responsibility for his +forsaken wife's pitiful fate--a responsibility which he himself tacitly +admits in a letter to Eliza Westbrook, wherein he refers to his taking up +with Mary Godwin as an act which Eliza "might excusably regard as the +cause of her sister's ruin." + + + + +End of this Project Gutenberg Etext of Defense of Harriet Shelley +by Mark Twain + diff --git a/old/mtdhs11.zip b/old/mtdhs11.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5961f82 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/mtdhs11.zip |