diff options
Diffstat (limited to '31677-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 31677-h/31677-h.htm | 16390 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 31677-h/images/i002.png | bin | 0 -> 429 bytes |
2 files changed, 16390 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/31677-h/31677-h.htm b/31677-h/31677-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..08a557b --- /dev/null +++ b/31677-h/31677-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,16390 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" /> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Studies in Contemporary Biography, by James Bryce, Viscount Bryce</title> +<style type="text/css"> + @media screen { + hr.pb {margin:30px 0; width:100%; border:none;border-top:thin dashed silver;} + .pagenum {display: inline; font-size: x-small; text-align: right; text-indent: 0; position: absolute; right: 2%; padding: 1px 3px; font-style: normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:normal; text-decoration: none; background-color: inherit; border:1px solid #eee;} + .pncolor {color: silver;} + } + @media print { + hr.pb {border:none;page-break-after: always;} + .pagenum { display:none; } + } + body {margin-left: 11%; margin-right: 10%;} + p {margin-top: 0.5em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.5em;} + + .center, div.center p{text-align:center;} + .fnanchor2 {text-decoration: none; font-size:80%; line-height:45%; vertical-align:105%;} + .padtop {margin-top:2em;} + .super {vertical-align:super; font-size:0.8em;} + .trnote {background-color: #EEE; color: inherit; margin: 2em 5% 1em 5%; font-size: 80%; padding: 0.5em 1em 0.5em 1em; border: dotted 1px gray;} + blockquote {display: block; margin: .75em 10% .75em 5%; font-size:0.9em;} + div.trchange {padding-left:4em; text-indent:-4em;} + h1 {font-size:1.8em; line-height:1.8;} + h1,h2 {font-weight:normal; text-align:center;} + h1.pg {font-size:190%; line-height:1; font-weight:bold; text-align:center;} + h2 {font-size:1.5em;} + hr.tb {border:none; margin:1.2em auto;} + ins.trchange {text-decoration: none; border-bottom: thin dotted gray;} + span.greek {border-bottom: thin dotted #999;} + td.chalgn {text-align:right; margin-top:0; padding-right:1em;} + + .chsp {margin: auto; text-align: center; padding-top: 2em; padding-bottom: 1em;} + .figcenter {margin: 2em auto 2em auto; text-align: center; width: auto;} + .figtag {height: 1px;} + .fnanchor {font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .smcaplc {text-transform: lowercase; font-variant: small-caps;} + a {text-decoration: none;} + hr.fn {width:3em; text-align:left; margin-left: 0; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; height:1px; border: none; border-bottom: 1px solid black;} + hr.major {width: 80%; border:none; border-bottom:1px solid silver; clear:both; margin: 1em auto;} + hr.mini {width: 20%; border:none; border-bottom:1px solid silver; clear:both; margin: 1em auto;} + hr.toprule {width: 65%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; border:none; border-bottom:1px solid silver; clear:both;} + p.cg {margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0; text-align: left; width: 101%;} + p.lalign {text-align: left !important;} + span.indent10 {margin: 0; padding:0; text-indent:0; width: 4.0em; display: block; float: left;} + span.indent2 {margin: 0; padding:0; text-indent:0; width: 0.8em; display: block; float: left;} + span.indent4 {margin: 0; padding:0; text-indent:0; width: 1.6em; display: block; float: left;} + span.indent6 {margin: 0; padding:0; text-indent:0; width: 2.4em; display: block; float: left;} + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; clear: both;} + + hr.full { width: 100%; + margin-top: 3em; + margin-bottom: 0em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + height: 4px; + border-width: 4px 0 0 0; /* remove all borders except the top one */ + border-style: solid; + border-color: #000000; + clear: both; } + pre {font-size: 85%;} +</style> +</head> +<body> +<h1 class="pg">The Project Gutenberg eBook, Studies in Contemporary Biography, by James +Bryce, Viscount Bryce</h1> +<pre> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at <a href = "http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></pre> +<p>Title: Studies in Contemporary Biography</p> +<p>Author: James Bryce, Viscount Bryce</p> +<p>Release Date: March 17, 2010 [eBook #31677]</p> +<p>Language: English</p> +<p>Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1</p> +<p>***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY BIOGRAPHY***</p> +<p> </p> +<h4 class="center">E-text prepared by David Clarke, Dan Horwood,<br /> + and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team<br /> + (<a href="http://www.pgdp.net/c/">http://www.pgdp.net</a>)<br /> + from page images generously made available by<br /> + Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries<br /> + (<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/toronto">http://www.archive.org/details/toronto</a>)</h4> +<p> </p> +<table border="0" style="background-color: #ccccff;" cellpadding="10"> + <tr> + <td valign="top"> + Note: + </td> + <td> + Images of the original pages are available through + Internet Archive/Canadian Libaries. See + <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/r8548972200brycuoft"> + http://www.archive.org/details/r8548972200brycuoft</a> + </td> + </tr> +</table> +<p> </p> +<hr class="full" /> +<p> </p> +<p> </p> +<p> </p> + +<h1>STUDIES<br /> +<span style='font-size:0.5em;'>IN</span><br /> +CONTEMPORARY BIOGRAPHY</h1> +<hr class='major' /> +<div class='figtag'> +<a name='linki_1' id='linki_1'></a> +</div> +<div class='figcenter'> +<img src='images/i002.png' alt='' title='' width='100' height='30' /><br /> +</div> +<hr class='major' /> +<div class='center'> +<h1 style='margin-bottom:2em;'><span style='font-size:0.8em;'>STUDIES</span><br /> +<span style='font-size:0.5em;'>IN</span><br /> +CONTEMPORARY<br /> +BIOGRAPHY</h1> + +<p style='font-size:0.8em;'>BY</p> +<p style='margin-top:0.8em; font-size:1.2em;'>JAMES BRYCE</p> +<p style='font-size:0.7em;'>AUTHOR OF<br /> +‘THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE,’ ‘THE AMERICAN COMMONWEALTH’, ETC.</p> +<p> </p> +<p> </p> +<p> </p> + +<p style='font-weight:bold; margin-top:4em;'>London</p> +<p>MACMILLAN AND CO., <span class='smcap'>Limited</span></p> +<p style='font-size:0.8em;'>NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</p> +<p style='margin-bottom:2em;'>1903</p> +<p style='font-size:0.8em;'><i>All rights reserved</i></p> +</div> +<hr class='mini' /> +<p class='center'><i>Copyright in the United States of America 1903</i></p> +<hr class='mini' /> +<div class='center' style='margin:4em auto;'> +<p><span style='font-size:0.8em;'>TO</span><br /> +CHARLES WILLIAM ELIOT<br /> +<span style='font-size:0.7em;'>PRESIDENT OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY</span></p> +<p style='font-size:0.8em;'>IN COMMEMORATION OF A LONG AND<br /> +VALUED FRIENDSHIP</p> +</div> +<hr class='pb' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_vii' name='page_vii'></a>vii</span> +<a name='PREFACE' id='PREFACE'></a> +<h2>PREFACE</h2> +</div> +<p>The first and the last of these Studies relate to +persons whose fame has gone out into all lands, and +about whom so much remains to be said that one +who has reflected on their careers need not offer +an apology for saying something. Of the other +eighteen sketches, some deal with eminent men +whose names are still familiar, but whose personalities +have begun to fade from the minds of the +present generation. The rest treat of persons +who came less before the public, but whose +brilliant gifts and solid services to the world +make them equally deserve to be remembered +with honour. Having been privileged to enjoy +their friendship, I have felt it a duty to do what +a friend can to present a faithful record of their +excellence which may help to keep their memory +fresh and green.</p> +<p>These Studies are, however, not to be regarded +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_viii' name='page_viii'></a>viii</span> +as biographies, even in miniature. My aim +has rather been to analyse the character and +powers of each of the persons described, and, +as far as possible, to convey the impression +which each made in the daily converse of life. +All of them, except Lord Beaconsfield, were +personally, and most of them intimately, known +to me.</p> +<p>In the six Studies which treat of politicians +I have sought to set aside political predilections, +and have refrained from expressing political +opinions, though it has now and then been +necessary to point out instances in which the +subsequent course of events has shown the +action of Lord Beaconsfield, Mr. Lowe, and +Mr. Gladstone to have been right or wrong (as +the case may be) in the action they respectively +took.</p> +<p>The sketches of T. H. Green, E. A. Freeman, +and J. R. Green were originally written +for English magazines, and most of the other +Studies have been published in the United +States. All of those that had already appeared +in print have been enlarged and revised, some +indeed virtually rewritten. I have to thank the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_ix' name='page_ix'></a>ix</span> +proprietors of the <i>English Historical Review</i>, +the <i>Contemporary Review</i>, and the <i>New York +Nation</i>, as also the Century Company of New +York, for their permission to use so much of +the matter of the volume as had appeared (in +its original form) in the organs belonging to +them respectively.</p> +<p><i>March 6, 1903.</i></p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_xi' name='page_xi'></a>xi</span> +<a name='CONTENTS' id='CONTENTS'></a> +<h2>CONTENTS</h2> +</div> +<table id='toc' border='0' cellpadding='2' cellspacing='0' summary='Contents' style='margin:1em auto;'> +<tr> + <td /> + <td /> + <td /> + + <td valign='top' align='right' style='font-size:0.8em;'>PAGE</td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>I.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1804-1881</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#BENJAMIN_DISRAELI_EARL_OF_BEACONSFIELD1'>1</a></td> + +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>II.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, Dean of Westminster</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1815-1881</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#DEAN_STANLEY16'>69</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>III.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Thomas Hill Green</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1836-1882</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#THOMAS_HILL_GREEN'>85</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>IV.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Archibald Campbell Tait, Archbishop of Canterbury</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1811-1882</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#ARCHBISHOP_TAIT19'>100</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>V.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Anthony Trollope</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1815-1882</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#ANTHONY_TROLLOPE21'>116</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>VI.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>John Richard Green</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1837-1883</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#JOHN_RICHARD_GREEN22'>131</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>VII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Sir George Jessel</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1824-1883</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#SIR_GEORGE_JESSEL_MASTER_OF_THE_ROLLS'>170</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>VIII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Hugh M’Calmont Cairns, Earl Cairns</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1819-1885</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#LORD_CHANCELLOR_CAIRNS'>184</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>IX.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>James Fraser, Bishop of Manchester</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1818-1885</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#BISHOP_FRASER'>196</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>X.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Stafford Henry Northcote, Earl of Iddesleigh</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1818-1887</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#SIR_STAFFORD_HENRY_NORTHCOTE_EARL_OF_IDDESLEIGH34'>211</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XI.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Charles Stewart Parnell</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1846-1891</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#CHARLES_STEWART_PARNELL'>227</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Henry Edward Manning, Archbishop and Cardinal</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1808-1892</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#CARDINAL_MANNING'>250</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XIII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Edward Augustus Freeman</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1823-1892</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#EDWARD_AUGUSTUS_FREEMAN37'>262</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XIV.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Robert Lowe, Viscount Sherbrooke</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1811-1892</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#ROBERT_LOWE_VISCOUNT_SHERBROOKE41'>293</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XV.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>William Robertson Smith</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1846-1894</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#WILLIAM_ROBERTSON_SMITH'>311</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XVI.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Henry Sidgwick</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1838-1900</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#HENRY_SIDGWICK'>327</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XVII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Edward Ernest Bowen</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1836-1901</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#EDWARD_ERNEST_BOWEN53'>343</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XVIII.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>Edwin Lawrence Godkin</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1831-1902</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#EDWIN_LAWRENCE_GODKIN'>363</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XIX.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>John Emerich Dalberg-Acton, Lord Acton</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1834-1902</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#LORD_ACTON'>382</a></td> +</tr> +<tr> + <td valign='top' class='chalgn'>XX.</td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'><span class='smcap'>William Ewart Gladstone</span></td> + <td valign='top' align='left' style='padding-right:4em;'>1809-1898</td> + <td valign='bottom' align='right'><a href='#WILLIAM_EWART_GLADSTONE'>400</a></td> +</tr> +</table> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_1' name='page_1'></a>1</span> +<a name='BENJAMIN_DISRAELI_EARL_OF_BEACONSFIELD1' id='BENJAMIN_DISRAELI_EARL_OF_BEACONSFIELD1'></a> +<h2>BENJAMIN DISRAELI, EARL OF BEACONSFIELD<a name="FNanchor_1" id="FNanchor_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor2">[1]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>When Lord Beaconsfield died in 1881 we all +wondered what people would think of him fifty +years thereafter. Divided as our own judgments +were, we asked whether he would still seem a +problem. Would opposite views regarding his +aims, his ideas, the sources of his power, still +divide the learned, and perplex the ordinary +reader? Would men complain that history cannot +be good for much when, with the abundant +materials at her disposal, she had not framed a +consistent theory of one who played so great a +part in so ample a theatre? People called him +a riddle; and he certainly affected a sphinx-like +attitude. Would the riddle be easier then than +it was for us, from among whom the man had +even now departed?</p> +<p>When he died, there were many in England +who revered him as a profound thinker and a +lofty character, animated by sincere patriotism. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_2' name='page_2'></a>2</span> +Others, probably as numerous, held him for no +better than a cynical charlatan, bent through +life on his own advancement, who permitted no +sense of public duty, and very little human +compassion, to stand in the way of his insatiate +ambition. The rest did not know what to think. +They felt in him the presence of power; they +felt also something repellent. They could not +understand how a man who seemed hard and +unscrupulous could win so much attachment and +command so much obedience.</p> +<p>Since Disraeli departed nearly one-half of +those fifty years has passed away. Few are +living who can claim to have been his personal +friends, none who were personal enemies. No +living statesman professes to be his political +disciple. The time has come when one may discuss +his character and estimate his career without +being suspected of doing so with a party bias +or from a party motive. Doubtless those who +condemn and those who defend or excuse some +momentous parts of his conduct, such as, for +instance, his policy in the East and in Afghanistan +from 1876 to 1879, will differ in their +judgment of his wisdom and foresight. If this +be a difficulty, it is an unavoidable one, and +may never quite disappear. There were in the +days of Augustus some who blamed that sagacious +ruler for seeking to check the expansion of the +Roman Empire. There were in the days of King +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_3' name='page_3'></a>3</span> +Henry the Second some who censured and others +who praised him for issuing the Constitutions of +Clarendon. Both questions still remain open to +argument; and the conclusion any one forms +must affect in some measure his judgment of +each monarch’s statesmanship. So differences of +opinion about particular parts of Disraeli’s long +career need not prevent us from dispassionately +inquiring what were the causes that enabled him +to attain so striking a success, and what is the +place which posterity is likely to assign to him +among the rulers of England.</p> +<p>First, a few words about the salient events of +his life, not by way of writing a biography, but +to explain what follows.</p> +<p>He was born in London, in 1804. His father, +Isaac Disraeli, was a literary man of cultivated +taste and independent means, who wrote a good +many books, the best known of which is his +<i>Curiosities of Literature</i>, a rambling work, full +of entertaining matter. He belonged to that +division of the Jewish race which is called +the Sephardim, and traces itself to Spain and +Portugal;<a name='FNanchor_0001' id='FNanchor_0001'></a><a href='#Footnote_0001' class='fnanchor'>[2]</a> but he had ceased to frequent the +synagogue—had, in fact, broken with his co-religionists. +Isaac had access to good society, so +that the boy saw eminent and polished men from +his early years, and, before he had reached manhood, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_4' name='page_4'></a>4</span> +began to make his way in drawing-rooms +where he met the wittiest and best-known people +of the day. He was articled to a firm of attorneys +in London in 1821, but after two or three +years quitted a sphere for which his peculiar gifts +were ill suited.<a name='FNanchor_0002' id='FNanchor_0002'></a><a href='#Footnote_0002' class='fnanchor'>[3]</a> Samuel Rogers, the poet, took +a fancy to him, and had him baptized at the age +of thirteen. As he grew up, he was often to be +seen with Count d’Orsay and Lady Blessington, +well-known figures who fluttered on the confines +of fashion and Bohemia. It is worth remarking +that he never went either to a public school or to +a university. In England it has become the +fashion to assume that nearly all the persons who +have shone in public life have been educated in one +of the great public schools, and that they owe to +its training their power of dealing with men and +assemblies. Such a superstition is sufficiently +refuted by the examples of men like Pitt, +Macaulay, Bishop Wilberforce, Disraeli, Cobden, +Bright, and Cecil Rhodes, not to add instances +drawn from Ireland and Scotland, where till very +recently there have been no public schools in the +current English sense.</p> +<p>Disraeli first appeared before the public in +1826, when he published <i>Vivian Grey</i>, an amazing +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_5' name='page_5'></a>5</span> +book to be the production of a youth of twenty-two. +Other novels—<i>The Young Duke</i>, <i>Venetia</i>, +<i>Contarini Fleming</i>, <i>Henrietta Temple</i>—maintained +without greatly increasing his reputation +between 1831 and 1837. Then came two +political stories, <i>Coningsby</i> and <i>Sybil</i>, in 1844 +and 1845, followed by <i>Tancred</i> in 1847, and the +<i>Life of Lord George Bentinck</i> in 1852; with a +long interval of silence, till, in 1870, he produced +<i>Lothair</i>, in 1880 <i>Endymion</i>. Besides these he +published in 1839 the tragedy of <i>Alarcos</i>, and in +1835 the more ambitious <i>Revolutionary Epick</i>, +neither of which had much success. In 1828-31 +he took a journey through the East, visiting +Constantinople, Syria, and Egypt, and it was +then, no doubt, in lands peculiarly interesting to +a man of his race, that he conceived those ideas +about the East and its mysterious influences +which figure largely in some of his stories, +notably in <i>Tancred</i>, and which in 1878 had no +small share in shaping his policy and that of +England. Meanwhile, he had not forgotten the +political aspirations which we see in <i>Vivian Grey</i>. +In 1832, just before the passing of the Reform +Bill, he appeared as candidate for the petty +borough of High Wycombe in Buckinghamshire, +and was defeated by a majority of twenty-three +to twelve, so few were the voters in many +boroughs of those days. After the Bill had +enlarged the constituency, he tried his luck twice +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_6' name='page_6'></a>6</span> +again, in 1833 and 1835, both times unsuccessfully, +and came before two other boroughs also, +Taunton and Marylebone, though in the latter +case no contest took place. Such activity in a +youth with little backing from friends and comparatively +slender means marked him already as +a man of spirit and ambition. His next attempt +was more lucky. At the general election of 1837 +he was returned for Maidstone.</p> +<p>His political professions during this period +have been keenly canvassed; nor is it easy to +form a fair judgment on them. In 1832 he +had sought and obtained recommendations from +Joseph Hume and Daniel O’Connell, and people +had therefore set him down as a Radical. Although, +however, his professions of political +faith included dogmas which, like triennial parliaments, +the ballot, and the imposition of a new +land-tax, were part of the so-called “Radical” +platform, still there was a vague and fanciful +note in his utterances, and an aversion to the +conventional Whig way of putting things, which +showed that he was not a thorough-going +adherent of any of the then existing political +parties, but was trying to strike out a new line +and attract men by the promise of something +fresher and bolder than the recognised schools +offered. In 1834 his hostility to Whiggism +was becoming more pronounced, and a tenderness +for some Tory doctrines more discernible. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_7' name='page_7'></a>7</span> +Finally, in 1835, he appeared as an avowed +Tory, accepting the regular creed of the party, +and declaring himself a follower of Sir Robert +Peel, but still putting forward a number of +views peculiar to himself, which he thereafter +developed not only in his speeches but in his +novels. <i>Coningsby</i> and <i>Sybil</i> were meant to be +a kind of manifesto of the “Young England” +party—a party which can hardly be said to have +existed outside his own mind, though a small knot +of aristocratic youths who caught up and repeated +his phrases seemed to form a nucleus for it.</p> +<p>The fair conclusion from his deliverances +during these early years is that he was at first +much more of a Liberal than a Tory, yet with +ideas distinctively his own which made him appear +in a manner independent of both parties. The +old party lines might seem to have been almost +effaced by the struggle over the Reform Bill; +and it was natural for a bold and inventive mind +to imagine a new departure, and put forward a +programme in which a sort of Radicalism was +mingled with doctrines of a different type. But +when it became clear after a time that the old +political divisions still subsisted, and that such a +distinctive position as he had conceived could not +be maintained, he then, having to choose between +one or other of the two recognised parties, chose +the Tories, dropping some tenets he had previously +advocated which were inconsistent with their +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_8' name='page_8'></a>8</span> +creed, but retaining much of his peculiar way +of looking at political questions. How far the +change which passed over him was a natural +development, how far due to mere calculations of +interest, there is little use discussing: perhaps he +did not quite know himself. Looking back, we +of to-day might be inclined to think that he received +more blame for it than he deserved, but +contemporary observers generally set it down to a +want of principle. In one thing, however, he was +consistent then, and remained consistent ever after—his +hearty hatred of the Whigs. There was +something in the dryness and coldness of the great +Whig families, their stiff constitutionalism, their +belief in political economy, perhaps also their +occasional toyings with the Nonconformists +(always an object of dislike to Disraeli), which +roused all the antagonisms of his nature, personal +and Oriental.</p> +<p>When he entered the House of Commons he +was already well known to fashionable London, +partly by his striking face and his powers of conversation, +partly by the eccentricities of his dress—he +loved bright-coloured waistcoats, and decked +himself with rings,—partly by his novels, whose +satirical pungency had made a noise in society. +He had also become, owing to his apparent change +of front, the object of angry criticism. A quarrel +with Daniel O’Connell, in the course of which he +challenged the great Irishman to fight a duel, each +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_9' name='page_9'></a>9</span> +party having described the other with a freedom +of language bordering on scurrility, made him, for +a time, the talk of the political world. Thus +there was more curiosity evoked by his first +speech than usually awaits a new member. It +was unsuccessful, not from want of ability, but +because its tone did not suit the temper of +the House of Commons, and because a hostile +section of the audience sought to disconcert him +by their laughter. Undeterred by this ridicule, +he continued to speak, though in a less +ambitious and less artificial vein, till after a few +years he had become one of the most conspicuous +unofficial members. At first no one had eulogised +Peel more warmly, but after a time he +edged away from the minister, whether repelled +by his coldness, which showed that in that +quarter no promotion was to be expected, or +shrewdly perceiving that Peel was taking a line +which would ultimately separate him from the +bulk of the Conservative party. This happened +in 1846, when Peel, convinced that the import +duties on corn were economically unsound, proposed +their abolition. Disraeli, who, since 1843, +had taken repeated opportunities of firing stray +shots at the powerful Prime Minister, now bore a +foremost part not only in attacking him, but in +organising the Protectionist party, and prompting +its leader, Lord George Bentinck. In embracing +free trade, Peel carried with him his own personal +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_10' name='page_10'></a>10</span> +friends and disciples, men like Gladstone, Sidney +Herbert, Lord Lincoln, Sir James Graham, Cardwell, +and a good many others, the intellectual <i>élite</i> +of the Tory party. The more numerous section +who clung to Protection had numbers, wealth, +respectability, cohesion, but brains and tongues +were scarce. An adroit tactician and incisive +speaker was of priceless value to them. Such +a man they found in Disraeli, while he gained, +sooner than he had expected, an opportunity of +playing a leading part in the eyes of Parliament +and the country. In the end of 1848, Lord +George Bentinck, who, though a man of natural +force and capable of industry when he pleased, +had been to some extent Disraeli’s mouthpiece, +died, leaving his prompter indisputably the keenest +intellect in the Tory-Protectionist party. In 1850, +Peel, who might possibly have in time brought +the bulk of that party back to its allegiance +to him, was killed by a fall from his horse. +The Peelites drifted more and more towards +Liberalism, so that when Lord Derby, who, in +1851, had been commissioned as head of the +Tory party to form a ministry, invited them to +join him, they refused to do so, imagining him +to be still in favour of the corn duties, and +resenting the behaviour of the Protectionist +section to their own master. Being thus unable +to find one of them to lead his followers in +the House of Commons, Lord Derby turned in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_11' name='page_11'></a>11</span> +1852 to Disraeli, giving him, with the leadership, +the office of Chancellor of the Exchequer. The +appointment was thought a strange one, because +Disraeli brought to it absolutely no knowledge +of finance and no official experience. He had +never been so much as an Under-Secretary. +The Tories themselves murmured that one whom +they regarded as an adventurer should be raised +to so high a place. After a few months Lord +Derby’s ministry fell, defeated on the Chancellor +of the Exchequer’s Budget, which had been +vehemently attacked by Mr. Gladstone. This +was the beginning of that protracted duel between +him and Mr. Disraeli which lasted down till the +end of the latter’s life.</p> +<p>For the following fourteen years Disraeli’s +occupation was that of a leader of Opposition, +varied by one brief interval of office in 1858-59. +His party was in a permanent minority, so that +nothing was left for its chief but to fight with +skill, courage, and resolution a series of losing +battles. This he did with admirable tenacity of +purpose. Once or twice in every session he used +to rally his forces for a general engagement, and +though always defeated, he never suffered himself +to be dispirited by defeat. During the rest of the +time he was keenly watchful, exposing all the mistakes +in domestic affairs of the successive Liberal +Governments, and when complications arose in +foreign politics, always professing, and generally +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_12' name='page_12'></a>12</span> +manifesting, a patriotic desire not to embarrass +the Executive, lest national interests should suffer. +Through all these years he had to struggle, not +only with a hostile majority in office, but also +with disaffection among his own followers. Many +of the landed aristocracy could not bring themselves +to acquiesce in the leadership of a new +man, of foreign origin, whose career had been +erratic, and whose ideas they found it hard to +assimilate. Ascribing their long exclusion from +power to his presence, they more than once +conspired to dethrone him. In 1861 these plots +were thickest, and Disraeli was for a time left +almost alone. But as it happened, there never +arose in the House of Commons any one on the +Conservative side possessing gifts of speech and +of strategy comparable to those which in him +had been matured and polished by long experience, +while he had the address to acquire +an ascendency over the mind of Lord Derby, +still the titular head of the party, who, being +a man of straightforward character, high social +position, and brilliant oratorical talent, was therewithal +somewhat lazy and superficial, and therefore +disposed to lean on his lieutenant in the +Lower House, and to borrow from him those +astute schemes of policy which Disraeli was fertile +in devising. Thus, through Lord Derby’s support, +and by his own imperturbable confidence, he frustrated +all the plots of the malcontent Tories. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_13' name='page_13'></a>13</span> +New men came up who had not witnessed his +earlier escapades, but knew him only as the bold +and skilful leader of their party in the House of +Commons. He made himself personally agreeable +to them, encouraged them in their first +efforts, diffused his ideas among them, stimulated +the local organisation of the party, and held out +hopes of great things to be done when fortune +should at last revisit the Tory banner.</p> +<p>While Lord Palmerston lived, these exertions +seemed to bear little fruit. That minister had, in +his later years, settled down into a sort of practical +Toryism, and both parties acquiesced in his +rule. But, on his death, the scene changed. +Lord Russell and Mr. Gladstone brought forward +a Reform Bill strong enough to evoke the latent +Conservative feeling of a House of Commons +which, though showing a nominally Liberal +majority, had been chosen under Palmerstonian +auspices. The defeat of the Bill, due to the defection +of the more timorous Whigs, was followed +by the resignation of Lord Russell’s Ministry. +Lord Derby and Mr. Disraeli came into power, +and, next year, carried a Reform Bill which, as it +was finally shaped in its passage through the House, +really went further than Lord Russell’s had done, +enfranchising a much larger number of the working +classes in boroughs. To have carried this Bill +remains the greatest of Disraeli’s triumphs. He +had to push it gently through a hostile House of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_14' name='page_14'></a>14</span> +Commons by wheedling a section of the Liberal +majority, against the appeals of their legitimate +leader. He had also to persuade his own followers +to support a measure which they had all their lives +been condemning, and which was, or in their view +ought to have been, more dangerous to the Constitution +than the one which they and the recalcitrant +Whigs had thrown out in the preceding +year. He had, as he happily and audaciously +expressed it, to educate his party into doing the +very thing which they (though certainly not he +himself) had cordially and consistently denounced.</p> +<p>The process was scarcely complete when the +retirement of Lord Derby, whose health had given +way, opened Disraeli’s path to the post of first +Minister of the Crown. He dissolved Parliament, +expecting to receive a majority from the gratitude +of the working class whom his Act had admitted +to the suffrage. To his own surprise, and to the +boundless disgust of the Tories, a Liberal House +of Commons was again returned, which drove him +and his friends once more into the cold shade of +Opposition. He was now sixty-four years of age, +had suffered an unexpected and mortifying discomfiture, +and had no longer the great name of +Lord Derby to cover him. Disaffected voices +were again heard among his own party, while the +Liberals, reinstalled in power, were led by the +rival whose unequalled popularity in the country +made him for the time omnipotent. Still Mr. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_15' name='page_15'></a>15</span> +Disraeli was not disheartened. He fought the +battle of apparently hopeless resistance with his +old tact, wariness, and tenacity, losing no occasion +for any criticism that could damage the measures—strong +and large measures—which Mr. Gladstone’s +Government brought forward.</p> +<p>Before long the tide turned. The Dissenters +resented the Education Act of 1870. A reaction +in favour of Conservatism set in, which grew +so fast that, in 1874, the general election gave, for +the first time since 1846, a decided Conservative +majority. Mr. Disraeli became again Prime +Minister, and now a Prime Minister no longer +on sufferance, but with the absolute command of +a dominant party, rising so much above the rest +of the Cabinet as to appear the sole author of its +policy. In 1876, feeling the weight of age, he +transferred himself to the House of Lords as +Earl of Beaconsfield. The policy he followed +(from 1876 till 1880) in the troubles which arose +in the Turkish East out of the insurrection in +Herzegovina and the massacres in Bulgaria, as +well as that subsequently pursued in Afghanistan +and in South Africa, while it received the enthusiastic +approval of the soldiers, the stockbrokers, +and the richer classes generally, raised no less +vehement opposition in other sections of the +nation, and especially in those two which, when +heartily united and excited, have usually been +masters of England—the Protestant Nonconformists +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_16' name='page_16'></a>16</span> +and the upper part of the working class. +An election fought with unusual heat left him in +so decided a minority that he resigned office in +April 1880, without waiting for an adverse vote +in Parliament. When the result had become +clear he observed, “They,” meaning his friends, +“will come in again, but I shall not.” A year +later he died.</p> +<p>Here is a wonderful career, not less wonderful +to those who live in the midst of English +politics and society than it appears to observers +in other countries. A man with few external +advantages, not even that of education at a +university, where useful friendships are formed, +with grave positive disadvantages in his Jewish +extraction and the vagaries of his first years of +public life, presses forward, step by step, through +slights and disappointments which retard but never +dishearten him, assumes as of right the leadership +of a party—the aristocratic party, the party in those +days peculiarly suspicious of new men and poor +men,—wins a reputation for sagacity which makes +his early errors forgotten, becomes in old age the +favourite of a court, the master of a great country, +one of the three or four arbiters of Europe. +There is here more than one problem to solve, +or, at least, a problem with more than one aspect. +What was the true character of the man who had +sustained such a part? Did he hold any principles, +or was he merely playing with them as counters? +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_17' name='page_17'></a>17</span> +By what gifts or arts did he win such a success? +Was there really a mystery beneath the wizard’s +robe which he delighted to wrap around him? +And how, being so unlike the Englishmen among +whom his lot was cast, did he so fascinate and +rule them?</p> +<p>Imagine a man of strong will and brilliant +intellectual powers, belonging to an ancient and +persecuted race, who finds himself born in a +foreign country, amid a people for whose ideas +and habits he has no sympathy and scant +respect. Suppose him proud, ambitious, self-confident—too +ambitious to rest content in a +private station, so self-confident as to believe that +he can win whatever he aspires to. To achieve +success, he must bend his pride, must use the +language and humour the prejudices of those he +has to deal with; while his pride avenges itself +by silent scorn or thinly disguised irony. Accustomed +to observe things from without, he discerns +the weak points of all political parties, the hollowness +of institutions and watchwords, the instability +of popular passion. If his imagination be more +susceptible than his emotions, his intellect more +active than his conscience, the isolation in which +he stands and the superior insight it affords him +may render him cold, calculating, self-centred. +The sentiment of personal honour may remain, +because his pride will support it; and he will be +tenacious of the ideas which he has struck out, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_18' name='page_18'></a>18</span> +because they are his own. But for ordinary +principles of conduct he may have small regard, +because he has not grown up under the conventional +morality of the time and nation, but has +looked on it merely as a phenomenon to be +recognised and reckoned with, because he has +noted how much there is in it of unreality or +pharisaism—how far it sometimes is from representing +or expressing either the higher judgments +of philosophy or the higher precepts of religion. +Realising and perhaps exaggerating the power +of his own intelligence, he will secretly revolve +schemes of ambition wherein genius, uncontrolled +by fears or by conscience, makes all +things bend to its purposes, till the scruples and +hesitations of common humanity seem to him +only parts of men’s cowardice or stupidity. What +success he will win when he comes to carry out +such schemes in practice will largely depend on +the circumstances in which he finds himself, as +well as on his gift for judging of them. He may +become a Napoleon. He may fall in a premature +collision with forces which want of sympathy has +prevented him from estimating.</p> +<p>In some of his novels, and most fully in the +first of them, Mr. Disraeli sketched a character +and foreshadowed a career not altogether unlike +that which has just been indicated. It would be +unfair to treat as autobiographical, though some +of his critics have done so, the picture of Vivian +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_19' name='page_19'></a>19</span> +Grey. What that singular book shows is that, +at an age when his contemporaries were lads at +college, absorbed in cricket matches or Latin +verse-making, Disraeli had already meditated +profoundly on the conditions and methods of +worldly success, had rejected the allurements of +pleasure and the attractions of literature, as well +as the ideal life of philosophy, had conceived of +a character isolated, ambitious, intense, resolute, +untrammelled by scruples, who moulds men to +his purposes by the sheer force of his intellect, +humouring their foibles, using their weaknesses, +and luring them into his chosen path by the bait +of self-interest.</p> +<p>To lay stress on the fact that Mr. Disraeli +was of Hebrew birth is not, though some of his +political antagonists stooped so to use it, to cast +any reproach upon him: it is only to note a fact +of the utmost importance for a proper comprehension +of his position. The Jews were at the +beginning of the nineteenth century still foreigners +in England, not only on account of their religion, +with its mass of ancient rites and usages, but also +because they were filled with the memory of +centuries of persecution, and perceived that in +some parts of Europe the old spirit of hatred had +not died out. The antiquity of their race, their +sense of its long-suffering and isolation, their +pride in the intellectual achievements of those +ancestors whose blood, not largely mixed with +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_20' name='page_20'></a>20</span> +that of any other race, flows in their veins, lead +the stronger or more reflective spirits to revenge +themselves by a kind of scorn upon the upstart +Western peoples among whom their lot is cast. +The mockery one finds in Heinrich Heine could +not have come from a Teuton. Even while imitating, +as the wealthier of them have latterly begun +to imitate, the manners and luxury of those +nominal Christians among whom they live, they +retain their feeling of detachment, and are apt +to regard with a coldly observant curiosity the +beliefs, prejudices, enthusiasms of the nations of +Europe. The same passionate intensity which +makes the grandeur of the ancient Hebrew +literature still lives among them, though often +narrowed by ages of oppression, and gives them +the peculiar effectiveness that comes from turning +all the powers of the mind, imaginative as well as +reasoning, into a single channel, be that channel +what it may. They produce, in proportion to +their numbers, an unusually large number of able +and successful men, as any one may prove by +recounting the eminent Jews of the last seventy +years. This success has most often been won in +practical life, in commerce, or at the bar, or in +the press (which over the European continent +they so largely control); yet often also in the +higher walks of literature or science, less frequently +in art, most frequently in music.</p> +<p>Mr. Disraeli had three of these characteristics +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_21' name='page_21'></a>21</span> +of his race in full measure—detachment, intensity, +the passion for material success. Nature gave +him a resolute will, a keen and precociously active +intellect, a vehement individuality; that is to +say, a consciousness of his own powers, and a +determination to make them recognised by his +fellows. In some men, the passion to succeed is +clogged by the fear of failure; in others, the +sense of their greatness is self-sufficing and +indisposes them to effort. But with him ambition +spurred self-confidence, and self-confidence +justified ambition. He grew up in a cultivated +home, familiar not only with books but with the +brightest and most polished men and women of +the day, whose conversation sharpened his wits +almost from childhood. No religious influences +worked upon him, for his father had ceased to +be a Jew in faith without becoming even +nominally a Christian, and there is little in his +writings to show that he had ever felt anything +more than an imaginative, or what may be called an +historical, interest in religion.<a name='FNanchor_0003' id='FNanchor_0003'></a><a href='#Footnote_0003' class='fnanchor'>[4]</a> Thus his development +was purely intellectual. The society he moved +in was a society of men and women of the world—witty, +superficial in its interests, without seriousness +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_22' name='page_22'></a>22</span> +or reverence. He felt himself no Englishman, +and watched English life and politics as a +student of natural history might watch the habits +of bees or ants. English society was then, and +perhaps is still, more complex, more full of inconsistencies, +of contrasts between theory and +practice, between appearances and realities, than +that of any other country. Nowhere so much +limitation of view among the fashionable, so much +pharisaism among the respectable, so much vulgarity +among the rich, mixed with so much real +earnestness, benevolence, and good sense; nowhere, +therefore, so much to seem merely ridiculous to +one who looked at it from without, wanting the +sympathy which comes from the love of mankind, +or even from the love of one’s country. It was +natural for a young man with Disraeli’s gifts to +mock at what he saw. But he would not sit +still in mere contempt. The thirst for power +and fame gave him no rest. He must gain what +he saw every one around him struggling for. +He must triumph over these people whose follies +amused him; and the sense that he perceived +and could use their follies would add zest to +his triumph. He might have been a great +satirist; he resolved to become a great statesman. +For such a career, his Hebrew detachment gave +him some eminent advantages. It enabled him +to take a cooler and more scientific view of the +social and political phenomena he had to deal +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_23' name='page_23'></a>23</span> +with. He was not led astray by party cries. +He did not share vulgar prejudices. He calculated +the forces at work as an engineer calculates +the strength of his materials, the strain they have +to bear from the wind, and the weights they +must support. And what he had to plan was +not the success of a cause, which might depend +on a thousand things out of his ken, but his own +success, a simpler matter.</p> +<p>A still greater source of strength lay in his +Hebrew intensity. It would have pleased him, +so full of pride in the pure blood of his race,<a name='FNanchor_0004' id='FNanchor_0004'></a><a href='#Footnote_0004' class='fnanchor'>[5]</a> +to attribute to that purity the singular power +of concentration which the Jews undoubtedly +possess. They have the faculty of throwing the +whole stress of their natures into the pursuit of +one object, fixing their eyes on it alone, sacrificing +to it other desires, clinging to it even when +it seems unattainable. Disraeli was only twenty-eight +when he made his first attempt to enter +the House of Commons. Four repulses did +not discourage him, though his means were but +scanty to support such contests; and the fifth +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_24' name='page_24'></a>24</span> +time he succeeded. When his first speech in +Parliament had been received with laughter, and +politicians were congratulating themselves that +this adventurer had found his level, he calmly +told them that he had always ended by succeeding +in whatever he attempted, and that +he would succeed in this too. He received no +help from his own side, who regarded him with +suspicion, but forced himself into prominence, +and at last to leadership, by his complete superiority +to rebuffs. Through the long years in +which he had to make head against a majority +in the House of Commons, he never seemed +disheartened by his repeated defeats, never relaxed +the vigilance with which he watched his +adversaries, never indulged himself (though he +was physically indolent and often in poor health) +by staying away from Parliament, even when +business was slack; never missed an opportunity +for exposing a blunder of his adversaries, or +commending the good service of one of his +own followers. The same curious tenacity was +apparent in his ideas. Before he was twenty-two +years of age he had, under the inspiration +of Bolingbroke, excogitated a theory of the +Constitution of England, of the way England +should be governed at home and her policy +directed abroad, from which he hardly swerved +through all his later life. Often as he was +accused of inconsistency, he probably believed +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_25' name='page_25'></a>25</span> +himself to be, and in a sense he was, substantially +faithful, I will not say to the same +doctrines, but to the same notions or tendencies; +and one could discover from the phrases he employed +how he fancied himself to be really following +out these old notions, even when his conduct +seemed opposed to the traditions of his party.<a name='FNanchor_0005' id='FNanchor_0005'></a><a href='#Footnote_0005' class='fnanchor'>[6]</a> +The weakness of intense minds is their tendency +to narrowness, and this weakness was in so far +his that, while always ready for new expedients, +he was not accessible to new ideas. Indeed, +the old ideas were too much a part of himself, +stamped with his own individuality, to be forsaken +or even varied. He did not love knowledge, nor +enjoy speculation for its own sake; he valued +views as they pleased his imagination or as they +carried practical results with them; and having +framed his theory once for all and worked steadily +upon its lines, he was not the man to admit that +it had been defective, and to set himself in later +life to repair it. His pride was involved in +proving it correct by applying it.</p> +<p>With this resolute concentration of purpose +there went an undaunted courage—a quality less +rare among English statesmen, but eminently +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_26' name='page_26'></a>26</span> +laudable in him, because for great part of his +career he had no family or party connections to +back him up, but was obliged to face the world +with nothing but his own self-confidence. So far +from seeking to conceal his Jewish origin, he displayed +his pride in it, and refused all support to +the efforts which the Tory party made to maintain +the exclusion of Jews from Parliament. Nobody +showed more self-possession and (except on two +or three occasions) more perfect self-command in +the hot strife of Parliament than this suspected +stranger. His opponents learnt to fear one who +never feared for himself; his followers knew that +their chief would not fail them in the hour of +danger. His very face and bearing had in them +an impassive calmness which magnetised those +who watched him. He liked to surround himself +with mystery, to pose as remote, majestic, self-centred, +to appear above the need of a confidant. +He would sit for hours on his bench in the House +of Commons, listening with eyes half-shut to furious +assaults on himself and his policy, not showing by +the movement of a muscle that he had felt a +wound; and when he rose to reply would discharge +his sarcasms with an air of easy coolness. That +this indifference was sometimes simulated appeared +by the resentment he showed afterwards.</p> +<p>Ambition such as his could not afford to be +scrupulous, nor have his admirers ever claimed +conscientiousness as one of his merits. One who +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_27' name='page_27'></a>27</span> +sets power and fame before him as the main +ends to be pursued may no doubt be restrained +by pride from the use of such means as are +obviously low and dishonourable. Other questionable +means he may reject because he knows +that the opinion of those whose good-will and +good word he must secure would condemn them. +But he will not be likely to allow kindliness or +compassion to stand in his way; nor will he be +very regardful of truth. To a statesman, who +must necessarily have many facts in his knowledge, +or many plans in his mind, which the +interests of his colleagues, or of his party, or of +the nation, forbid him to reveal, the temptation to +put questioners on a false scent, and to seem to +agree where he really dissents, is at all times a +strong one. An honest man may sometimes be +betrayed into yielding to it; and those who know +how difficult are the cases of conscience that arise +will not deal harshly with a possibly misleading +silence, or even with the evasion of an embarrassing +inquiry, where a real public interest can +be pleaded, for the existence of such a public +interest, if it does not justify, may palliate omissions +to make a full disclosure of the facts. All +things considered, the standard of truthfulness +among English public men has (of course with +some conspicuous exceptions) been a high one. +Of that standard Disraeli fell short. People did +not take his word for a thing as they would have +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_28' name='page_28'></a>28</span> +taken the word of the Duke of Wellington, or +Lord Althorp, or Lord Derby, or Lord Russell, +or even of that not very rigid moralist, Lord +Palmerston. Instances of his lapses were not +wanting as late as 1877. His behaviour toward +Sir Robert Peel, whom he plied with every dart +of sarcasm, after having shortly before lavished +praises on him, and sought office under him, has +often been commented on.<a name='FNanchor_0006' id='FNanchor_0006'></a><a href='#Footnote_0006' class='fnanchor'>[7]</a> Disraeli was himself +(as those who knew him have often stated) accustomed +to justify it by observing that he was +then an insignificant personage, to whom it was +supremely important to attract public notice and +make a political position; that the opportunity +of attacking the powerful Prime Minister, at a +moment when their altered attitude towards the +Corn Laws had exposed the Ministry to the suspicions +of their own party, was too good to be +lost; and that he was therefore obliged to assail +Peel, though he had himself no particular attachment +to the Corn Laws, and believed Peel to have +been a <i>bona-fide</i> convert. It was therefore no +personal resentment against one who had slighted +him, but merely the exigencies of his own career, +that drove him to this course, whose fortunate +result proved the soundness of his calculations.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_29' name='page_29'></a>29</span></div> +<p>This defence will not surprise any one who +is familiar with Disraeli’s earlier novels. These +stories are as far as possible from being immoral; +that is to say, there is nothing in them unbecoming +or corrupting. Friendship, patriotism, love, are +all recognised as powerful and worthy motives of +conduct. That which is wanting is the sense of +right and wrong. His personages have for certain +purposes the conventional sense of honour, though +seldom a fine sense, but they do not ask whether +such and such a course is conformable to principle. +They move in a world which is polished, agreeable, +dignified, averse to baseness and vulgarity, +but in which conscience and religion scarcely +seem to exist. The men live for pleasure or +fame, the women for pleasure or love.</p> +<p>Some allowance must, of course, be made for +the circumstances of Disraeli’s position and early +training. He was brought up neither a Jew nor +a Christian. The elder people who took him +by the hand when he entered life, people like +Samuel Rogers and Lady Blessington, were not +the people to give lessons in morality. Lord +Lyndhurst, the first of his powerful political +friends, and the man whose example most affected +him, was, with all his splendid gifts, conspicuously +wanting in political principle. Add to this the +isolation in which the young man found himself, +standing outside the common stream of English +life, not sharing its sentiments, perceiving the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_30' name='page_30'></a>30</span> +hollowness of much that passed for virtue and +patriotism, and it is easy to understand how he +should have been as perfect a cynic at twenty-five +as their experience of the world makes many +at sixty. If he had loved truth or mankind, he +might have quickly worked through his youthful +cynicism. But pride and ambition, the pride of +race and the pride of genius, left no room for +these sentiments. Nor was his cynicism the fruit +merely of a keen and sceptical intelligence. It +came from a cold heart.</p> +<p>The pursuit of fame and power, to which he +gave all his efforts, is presented in his writings as +the only alternative ideal to a life of pleasure; and +he probably regarded those who pursued some +other as either fools or weaklings. Early in his +political life he said one night to Mr. Bright +(from whom I heard the anecdote), as they took +their umbrellas in the cloak-room of the House +of Commons: “After all, what is it that brings +you and me here? Fame! This is the true +arena. I might have occupied a literary throne; +but I have renounced it for this career.” The +external pomps and trappings of life, titles, stately +houses and far-spreading parks, all those gauds and +vanities with which sumptuous wealth surrounds +itself, had throughout his life a singular fascination +for him. He liked to mock at them in his novels, +but they fascinated him none the less. One can +understand how they might fire the imagination +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_31' name='page_31'></a>31</span> +of an ambitious youth who saw them from a +distance—might even retain their charm for one +who was just struggling into the society which +possessed them, and who desired to feel himself +the equal of the possessors. It is stranger that, +when he had harnessed the English aristocracy +to his chariot, and was driving them where he +pleased, he should have continued to admire such +things. So, however, it was. There was even +in him a vein of inordinate deference to rank +and wealth which would in a less eminent person +have been called snobbishness. In his will he +directs that his estate of Hughenden Manor, in +Buckinghamshire, shall pass under an entail as +strict as he could devise, that the person who +succeeds to it shall always bear the name of +Disraeli. His ambition is the common, not to +say vulgar, ambition of the English <i>parvenu</i>, +to found a “county family.” In his story of +<i>Endymion</i>, published a few months before his +death, the hero, starting from small beginnings, +ends by becoming prime minister: this is the +crown of his career, the noblest triumph an +Englishman can achieve. It might have been +thought that one who had been through it all, +who had realised the dreams of his boyhood, who +had every opportunity of learning what power +and fame come to, would have liked to set forth +some other conception of the end of human life, +or would not have told the world so naively of his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_32' name='page_32'></a>32</span> +self-content at having attained the aim he had +worked for. With most men the flower they have +plucked withers. It might have been expected +that one who was in other things an ironical cynic +would at least have sought to seem disillusionised.</p> +<p>To say that Disraeli’s heart was somewhat +cold is by no means to say that he was heartless. +He was one of those strong natures who permit +neither persons nor principles to stand in their +way. His doctrine was that politics had nothing +to do with sentiment; so those who appealed to +him on grounds of humanity appealed in vain. +No act of his life ever so much offended English +opinion as the airy fashion in which he tossed aside +the news of the Bulgarian massacre of 1876. It +incensed sections who were strong enough, when +thoroughly roused, to bring about his fall. But +he was far from being unkindly. He knew how +to attach men to him by friendly deeds as well as +friendly words. He seldom missed an opportunity +of saying something pleasant and cheering +to a <i>débutant</i> in Parliament, whether of his own +party or the opposite. He was not selfish in +little things; was always ready to consider the +comfort and convenience of those who surrounded +him. Age and success, so far from making him +morose or supercilious, softened the asperities of +his character and developed the affectionate side +of it. His last novel, published a few months +before his death, contains more human kindliness, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_33' name='page_33'></a>33</span> +a fuller recognition of the worth of friendship and +the beauty of sisterly and conjugal love, than do +the writings of his earlier manhood. What it +wants in intellectual power it makes up for in a +mellower and more tender tone. Of loyalty to +his political friends he was a model, and nothing +did more to secure his command of the party +than its sense that his professional honour, so to +speak, could be implicitly relied upon. To his +wife, a warm-hearted woman older than himself, +and inferior to him in education, he was uniformly +affectionate and indeed devoted. The +first use he made of his power as Prime +Minister was to procure for her the title of +viscountess. Being once asked point blank by a +lady what he thought of his life-long opponent, +Mr. Gladstone answered that two things had +always struck him as very admirable in Lord +Beaconsfield’s character—his perfect loyalty to +his wife, and his perfect loyalty to his own race. +A story used to be told how, in Disraeli’s earlier +days, when his political position was still far from +assured, he and his wife happened to be the +guests of the chief of the party, and that chief so +far forgot good manners as to quiz Mrs. Disraeli +at the dinner-table. Next morning Disraeli, +whose visit was to have lasted for some days +longer, announced that he must leave immediately. +The host besought him to stay, and made all +possible apologies. But Disraeli was inexorable, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_34' name='page_34'></a>34</span> +and carried off his wife forthwith. To literary +men, whatever their opinions, he was ready to +give a helping hand, representing himself as one +of their profession. In paying compliments he +was singularly expert, and few used the art so well +to win friends and disarm enemies. He knew how +to please Englishmen, and especially the young, +by showing interest in their tastes and pleasures, +and, without being what would be called genial, +was never wanting in <i>bonhomie</i>. In society he +was a perfect man of the world—told his anecdote +apropos, wound up a discussion by some +epigrammatic phrase, talked to the guest next +him, if he thought that guest’s position made him +worth talking to, as he would to an old acquaintance. +But he had few intimates; nor did his +apparent frankness unveil his real thoughts.</p> +<p>He was not of those who complicate political +opposition with private hatreds. Looking on +politics as a game, he liked, when he took off +his armour, to feel himself on friendly terms with +his antagonists, and often seemed surprised to +find that they remembered as personal affronts +the blows which he had dealt in the tournament. +Two or three years before his death, a friend +asked him whether there was in London any one +with whom he would not shake hands. Reflecting +for a moment, he answered, “Only one,” and +named Robert Lowe, who had said hard things of +him, and to whom, when Lowe was on one occasion +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_35' name='page_35'></a>35</span> +in his power, he had behaved with cruelty. Yet +his resentments could smoulder long. In <i>Lothair</i> +he attacked, under a thin disguise, a distinguished +man of letters who had criticised his conduct years +before. In <i>Endymion</i> he gratified what was evidently +an ancient grudge by a spiteful presentation +of Thackeray, as he had indulged his more bitter +dislike of John Wilson Croker by portraying +that politician in <i>Coningsby</i> under the name of +Nicholas Rigby. For the greatest of his adversaries +he felt, there is reason to believe, +genuine admiration, mingled with inability to +comprehend a nature so unlike his own. No +passage in the striking speech which that adversary +pronounced, one might almost say, over +Lord Beaconsfield’s grave—a speech which may +possibly go down to posterity with its subject—was +more impressive than the sentence in which +he declared that he had the best reason to believe +that, in their constant warfare, Lord Beaconsfield +had not been actuated by any personal hostility. +Brave men, if they can respect, seldom dislike, a +formidable antagonist.</p> +<p>His mental powers were singularly well suited +to the rest of his character—were, so to speak, +all of a piece with it. One sometimes sees intellects +which are out of keeping with the active +or emotional parts of the man. One sees persons +whose thought is vigorous, clear, comprehensive, +while their conduct is timid; or a comparatively +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_36' name='page_36'></a>36</span> +narrow intelligence joined to an enterprising +spirit; or a sober, reflective, sceptical turn of mind +yoked to an ardent and impulsive temperament. +What we call the follies of the wise often spring +from some such source. Not so with him. His +intelligence had the same boldness, intensity, concentration, +directness, which we discover in the +rest of the man. It was just the right instrument, +not perhaps for the normal career of a +normal Englishman seeking political success, but +for the particular kind of work Disraeli had +planned to do; and this inner harmony was one +of the chief causes of his success, as the want of it +has caused the failure of so many gifted natures.</p> +<p>The range of his mind was not wide. All its +products were like one another. No one of them +gives the impression that Disraeli could, had he so +wished, have succeeded in a wholly diverse line. +It was a peculiar mind: there is even more variety +in minds than in faces. It was not logical or discursive, +liking to mass and arrange stores of knowledge, +and draw inferences from them, nor was it +judicial, with a turn for weighing reasons and +reaching a decision which recognises all the facts +and is not confused by their seeming contradictions. +Neither was it analytically subtle. It +reached its conclusions by a process of intuition +or divination in which there was an imaginative +as well as a reflective element. It might almost +have been called an artist’s mind, capable of deep +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_37' name='page_37'></a>37</span> +meditation, but meditating in an imaginative way, +not so much on facts as on its own views of +facts, on the pictures which its own creative +faculty had called up. The meditation became +dreamy, but the dreaminess was corrected by an +exceedingly keen and quick power of observation, +not the scientific observation of the philosopher, +but rather the enjoying observation of the artist +who sees how he can use the characteristic +details which he notes, or the observation of +the forensic advocate (an artist, too, in his way) +who perceives how they can be fitted into the presentation +of his case. There are, of course, other +qualities in Disraeli’s work. As a statesman he +was obliged to learn how to state facts, to argue, +to dissect an opponent’s arguments. But the +characteristic note, both of his speeches and of +his writings, is the combination of a few large +ideas, clear, perhaps, to himself, but generally +expressed with grandiose vagueness, and often +quite out of relation to the facts as other people +saw them, with a turn for acutely fastening +upon small incidents or personal traits. In his +speeches he used his command of sonorous +phrases and lively illustrations, sometimes to +support the views he was advancing, but more +frequently to conceal the weakness of those +views; that is, to make up for the absence of +such solid arguments as were likely to move his +hearers. Everybody is now and then conscious +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_38' name='page_38'></a>38</span> +of holding with assured conviction theories which +he would find it hard to prove to a given +audience, partly because it is too much trouble +to trace out the process by which they were +reached, partly because uninstructed listeners +could not be made to feel the full cogency of +the considerations on which his own mind +relies. Disraeli was usually in this condition +with regard to his political and social doctrines. +He believed them, but as he had not reached +them by logic, he was not prepared to use +logic to establish them; so he picked up some +plausible illustration, or attacked the opposite +doctrine and its supporters with a fire of raillery +or invective. This non-ratiocinative quality of +his thinking was a source both of strength and +of weakness—of weakness, because he could +not prove his propositions; of strength, because, +stated as he stated them, it was not less hard +to disprove them. That mark of a superior +mind, that it must have a theory, was never +wanting. Some one said of him that he was +“the ruins of a thinker.” He could not rest +content, like many among his followers, with a +prejudice, a dogma delivered by tradition, a stolid +suspicion unamenable to argument. He would +not acquiesce in negation. He must have a +theory, a positive theory, to show not only that +his antagonist’s view was erroneous, but that he +had himself a more excellent way. These theories +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_39' name='page_39'></a>39</span> +generally had in them a measure of truth and +value for any one who could analyse them; but +as this was exactly what the rank and file of the +party could not do, they got into sad confusion +when they tried to talk his language.</p> +<p>He could hardly be called a well-read man, +nor were his intellectual interests numerous. His +education had consisted mainly in promiscuous +reading during boyhood and early youth. There +are worse kinds of education for an active intelligence +than to let it have the run of a large +library. The wild browsings of youth, when +curiosity is strong as hunger, stir the mind and +give the memory some of the best food it ever +gets. The weak point of such a method is that it +does not teach accuracy nor the art of systematic +study. In middle life natural indolence and his +political occupations had kept Disraeli from filling +up the gaps in his knowledge, while, in conversation, +what he liked best was persiflage. He +was, however, tolerably familiar with the ancient +classics, and with modern English and French +literature; enjoyed Quintilian and Lucian, preferred +Sophocles to Æschylus and (apparently) Horace +to Virgil, despised Browning, considered Tennyson +the best of contemporary poets, but “not a +poet of a high order.”<a name='FNanchor_0007' id='FNanchor_0007'></a><a href='#Footnote_0007' class='fnanchor'>[8]</a> Physical science seems +never to have attracted him. Political economy +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_40' name='page_40'></a>40</span> +he hated and mocked at almost as heartily as +did Carlyle. People have measured his knowledge +of history and geography by observing +that he placed the Crucifixion in the lifetime +of Augustus, and thought, down till 1878, when +he had to make a speech about Afghanistan, that +the Andes were the highest mountains in the +world. But geography is a subject which a man +of affairs does not think of reading up in later +life: he is content if he can get information +when he needs it. There are some bits of metaphysics +and some historical allusions scattered +over his novels, but these are mostly slight or +superficial. He amused himself and the public +by now and then propounding doctrines on agricultural +matters, but would not appear to have +mastered either husbandry or any other economical +or commercial subject. Such things were not +in his way. He had been so little in office as +not to have been forced to apply himself to them, +while the tide of pure intellectual curiosity had +long since ebbed.</p> +<p>For so-called “sports” he had little taste. He +liked to go mooning in a meditative way round his +fields and copses, and he certainly enjoyed Nature; +but there seems to be no solid evidence that the +primrose was his favourite flower. In his fondness +for particular words and phrases there +was a touch of his artistic quality, and a touch +also of the cynical view that words are the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_41' name='page_41'></a>41</span> +counters with which the wise play their game. +There is a passage in <i>Contarini Fleming</i> (a story +into which he has put a good deal of himself) +where this is set out. Contarini tells his father +that he left college “because they taught me only +words, and I wished to learn ideas.” His father +answers, “Few ideas are correct ones, and what +are correct, no one can ascertain; but with words +we govern men.”</p> +<p>He went on acting on this belief in the power +of words till he became the victim of his own +phrases, just as people who talk cynically for +effect grow sometimes into real cynics. When +he had invented a phrase which happily expressed +the aspect he wished his view, or some part of his +policy, to bear, he came to believe in the phrase, +and to think that the facts were altered by the +colour the phrase put upon them. During the +contest for the extension of the parliamentary +franchise, he declared himself “in favour of +popular privileges, but opposed to democratic +rights.” When he was accused of having assented, +at the Congress of Berlin, to the dismemberment +of the Turkish Empire, he said +that what had been done was “not dismemberment, +but consolidation.” No statesman of recent +times has given currency to so many quasi-epigrammatic +expressions: “organised hypocrisy,” +“England dislikes coalitions,” “plundering and +blundering,” “peace with honour,” “<i>imperium +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_42' name='page_42'></a>42</span> +et libertas</i>,” “a scientific frontier,” “I am on +the side of the angels,” are a few, not perhaps +the best, though the best remembered, of the +many which issued from his fertile mint. This +turn for epigram, not common in England, +sometimes led him into scrapes which would +have damaged a man of less imperturbable +coolness. No one else could have ventured to +say, when he had induced the Tories to pass +a Reform Bill stronger than the one they had +rejected from the Liberals in the preceding +year, that it had been his mission “to educate +his party.” Some of his opponents professed +to be shocked by such audacity, and many +old Tories privily gnashed their teeth. But the +country received the dictum in the spirit in which +it was spoken. “It was Disraeli all over.”</p> +<p>If his intellect was not of wide range, it was +within its range a weapon of the finest flexibility +and temper. It was ingenious, ready, incisive. +It detected in a moment the weak point, if not of +an argument, yet of an attitude or of a character. +Its imaginative quality made it often picturesque, +sometimes even impressive. Disraeli had the +artist’s delight in a situation for its own sake, and +what people censured as insincerity or frivolity was +frequently only the zest which he felt in posing, +not so much because there was anything to be +gained, as because he realised his aptitude for +improvising a new part in the drama which he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_43' name='page_43'></a>43</span> +always felt himself to be playing. The humour of +the situation was too good to be wasted. Perhaps +this love of merry mischief may have had something +to do with his tendency to confer honours +on those whom the world thought least deserving.</p> +<p>His books are not only a valuable revelation +of his mind, but have more literary merit than +critics have commonly allowed to them, perhaps +because we are apt, when a man excels in one +walk, to deem him to have failed in any other +wherein he does not reach the same level. The +novels foam over with cleverness; indeed, <i>Vivian +Grey</i>, with all its youthful faults, gives as great +an impression of intellectual brilliance as does +anything Disraeli ever wrote or spoke. Their +easy fertility makes them seem to be only, +so to speak, a few sketches out of a large +portfolio. There is some variety in the subjects—<i>Contarini +Fleming</i> and <i>Tancred</i> are +more romantic than the others, <i>Sybil</i> and <i>Coningsby</i> +more political—as well as in the merits +of the stories. The two latest, <i>Lothair</i> and +<i>Endymion</i>, works of his old age, are markedly +inferior in spirit and invention; but the general +features are the same in all—a lively fancy, a +knack of hitting characters off in a few lines and +of catching the superficial aspects of society, a +brisk narrative, a sprightly dialogue, a keen insight +into the selfishness of men and the vanities of +women, with flashes of wit lighting up the whole +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_44' name='page_44'></a>44</span> +stage. It is always a stage. The brilliance +is never open-air sunshine. There is scarcely one +of the characters whom we feel we might have +met and known. Heroes and heroines are +theatrical figures; their pathos rings false, their +love, though described as passionate, does not +spring from the inner recesses of the soul. The +studies of men of the world, and particularly of +heartless ones, are the most life-like; yet, even +here, any one who wants to feel the difference +between the great painter and the clever sketcher +need only compare Thackeray’s Marquis of +Steyne with Disraeli’s Marquis of Monmouth, +both of them suggested by the same original. +There is little intensity, little dramatic power +in these stories, as also in his play of <i>Alarcos</i>; +and if we read them with pleasure it is not +for the sake either of plot or of character, +but because they contain so many sparkling +witticisms and reflections, setting in a strong +light, yet not always an unkindly light, the seamy +side of politics and human nature. The slovenliness +of their style, which is often pompous, but +seldom pure, makes them appear to have been +written hastily. But Disraeli seems to have +taken the composition of them (except, perhaps, +the two latest) quite seriously. When he wrote +the earlier tales, he meant to achieve literary +greatness; while the middle ones, especially +<i>Coningsby</i> and <i>Sybil</i>, were designed as political +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_45' name='page_45'></a>45</span> +manifestoes. The less they have a purpose or +profess to be serious, the better they are; and +the most vivacious of all are two classical burlesques, +written at a time when that kind of +composition had not yet become common—<i>Ixion +in Heaven</i> and <i>The Infernal Marriage</i>—little +pieces of funning worthy of Thackeray, +I had almost said of Voltaire. They recall, +perhaps they were suggested by, similar pieces +of Lucian’s. Is Semitic genius specially rich in +this mocking vein? Lucian was a Syrian from +Samosata, probably a Semite; Heinrich Heine +was a Semite; James Russell Lowell used to +insist, though he produced little evidence for his +belief, that Voltaire was a Semite.</p> +<p>Whether Disraeli could ever have taken high +rank as a novelist if he had thrown himself completely +into the profession may be doubted, for his +defects were such as pains and practice would hardly +have lessened. That he had still less the imagination +needed by a poet, his <i>Revolutionary Epick</i>, conceived +on the plains of Troy, and meant to make +a fourth to the <i>Iliad</i>, the <i>Æneid</i>, and the <i>Divina +Commedia</i>, is enough to show. The literary +vocation he was best fitted for was that of a +journalist or pamphleteer; and in this he might +have won unrivalled success. His dash, his +verve, his brilliancy of illustration, his scorching +satire, would have made the fortune of any newspaper, +and carried dismay into the enemy’s ranks.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_46' name='page_46'></a>46</span></div> +<p>In inquiring how far the gifts I have sought to +describe qualified Disraeli for practical statesmanship, +it is well to distinguish the different kinds +of capacity which an English politician needs to +attain the highest place. They may be said to +be four. He must be a debater. He must be a +parliamentary tactician. He must understand the +country. He must understand Europe. This last +is, indeed, not always necessary; there have been +moments when England, leaving Europe to itself, +may look to her own affairs only; but when the +sky grows stormy over Europe, the want of knowledge +which English statesmen sometimes evince +may bode disaster.</p> +<p>An orator, in the highest sense of the word, +Disraeli never was. He lacked ease and fluency. +He had not Pitt’s turn for the lucid exposition of +complicated facts, nor for the conduct of a close +argument. The sustained and fiery declamation of +Fox was equally beyond his range. And least of +all had he that truest index of eloquence, the power +of touching the emotions. He could not make his +hearers weep. But he could make them laugh; +he could put them in good-humour with themselves; +he could dazzle them with rhetoric; +he could pour upon an opponent streams of +ridicule more effective than the hottest indignation. +When he sought to be profound or solemn, +he was usually heavy and laboured—the sublimity +often false, the diction often stilted. For wealth +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_47' name='page_47'></a>47</span> +of thought or splendour of language his speeches +will not bear to be compared—I will not say with +those of Burke (on whom he sometimes tried to +model himself), but with those of three or four of +his own contemporaries. Even within his own +party, Lord Derby, Lord Ellenborough, and Lord +Cairns in their several ways surpassed him. There +is not one of his longer and more finished harangues +which can be read with interest from beginning to +end. But there is hardly any among them which +does not contain some striking passage, some +image or epigram, or burst of sarcasm, which +must have been exceedingly effective when delivered. +It is partly upon these isolated passages, +especially the sarcastic ones (though the witticisms +were sometimes borrowed), and still more upon +the aptness of the speech to the circumstances +under which it was made, that his parliamentary +fame rests. If he was not a great orator he was +a superb debater, who watched with the utmost +care the temper of the audience, and said just +what was needed at the moment to disconcert an +opponent or to put heart into his friends. His +repartees were often happy, and must sometimes +have been unpremeditated. As he had not the +ardent temperament of the born orator, so neither +had he the external advantages which count for +much before large assemblies. His voice was +not remarkable either for range or for quality. +His manner was somewhat stiff, his gestures few, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_48' name='page_48'></a>48</span> +his countenance inexpressive. Yet his delivery +was not wanting in skill, and often added point, +by its cool unconcern, to a stinging epigram.</p> +<p>What he lacked in eloquence he made up +for by tactical adroitness. No more consummate +parliamentary strategist has been seen in +England. He had studied the House of Commons +till he knew it as a player knows his instrument—studied +it collectively, for it has a collective +character, and studied the men who compose +it: their worse rather than their better side, +their prejudices, their foibles, their vanities, +their ambitions, their jealousies, above all, that +curious corporate pride which they have, and +which makes them resent any approach to dictation. +He could play on every one of these +strings, and yet so as to conceal his skill; and he +so economised himself as to make them always +wish to hear him. He knew how in a body of +men obliged to listen to talk, and most of it +tedious talk, about matters in themselves mostly +uninteresting, the desire for a little amusement +becomes almost a passion; and he humoured +this desire so far as occasionally to err by +excess of banter and flippancy. Almost always +respectful to the House, he had a happy +knack of appearing to follow rather than to +lead, and when he made an official statement +it was with the air of one who was taking +them into his confidence. Much of this he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_49' name='page_49'></a>49</span> +may have learned from observing Lord Palmerston; +but the art came more naturally to that +statesman, who was an Englishman all through, +than to a man of Mr. Disraeli’s origin, who +looked on Englishmen from outside, and never +felt himself, so to speak, responsible for their +habits or ideas.</p> +<p>As leader of his party in Opposition, he was +at once daring and cautious. He never feared +to give battle, even when he expected defeat, +if he deemed it necessary, with a view to the +future, that the judgment of his party should +have been pronounced in a formal way. On +the other hand, he was wary of committing himself +to a policy of blind or obstinate resistance. +When he perceived that the time had come to +yield, he knew how to yield with a good grace, +so as both to support a character for reasonableness +and to obtain valuable concessions as +the price of peace. If difficulties arose with +foreign countries he claimed full liberty of +criticising the conduct of the Ministry, but +ostentatiously abstained from obstructing or +thwarting their acts, declaring that England must +always present a united front to the foreigner, +whatever penalties she might afterwards visit +on those who had mismanaged her concerns. +As regards the inner discipline of his party, +he had enormous difficulties to surmount in the +jealousy which many Tories felt for him as a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_50' name='page_50'></a>50</span> +new man, a man whom they could not understand +and only partially trusted.<a name='FNanchor_0008' id='FNanchor_0008'></a><a href='#Footnote_0008' class='fnanchor'>[9]</a> Conspiracies +were repeatedly formed against him; malcontents +attacked him in the press, and sometimes even in +Parliament. These he seldom noticed, maintaining +a cool and self-confident demeanour which +disheartened the plotters, and discharging the +duties of his post with steady assiduity. He +was always on the look-out for young men of +promise, drew them towards him, encouraged +them to help him in parliamentary sharp-shooting, +and fostered in every way the spirit of party. +The bad side of that spirit was seen when he +came into office, for then every post in the +public service was bestowed either by mere +favouritism or on party grounds; and men who +had been loyal to him were rewarded by places +or titles to which they had no other claim. +But the unity and martial fervour of the Tory +party was raised to the highest point. Nor was +Disraeli himself personally unpopular with his +parliamentary opponents, even when he was most +hotly attacked on the platform and in the press.</p> +<p>To know England and watch the shifting +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_51' name='page_51'></a>51</span> +currents of its opinion is a very different matter +from knowing the House of Commons. Indeed, +the two kinds of knowledge are in a measure +incompatible. Men who enter Parliament soon +begin to forget that it is not, in the last resort, +Parliament that governs, but the people. Absorbed +in the daily contests of their Chamber, +they over-estimate the importance of those contests. +They come to think that Parliament is +in fact what it is in theory, a microcosm of +the nation, and that opinion inside is sure to +reflect the opinion outside. When they are in a +minority they are depressed; when they are in +a majority they fancy that all is well, forgetting +their masters out-of-doors. This tendency is +aggravated by the fact that the English Parliament +meets in the capital, where the rich and +luxurious congregate and give their tone to +society. The House of Commons, though many +of its members belong to the middle class by +origin, belongs practically to the upper class by +sympathy, and is prone to believe that what it +hears every evening at dinners or receptions is +what the country is thinking. A member of the +House of Commons is, therefore, ill-placed for +feeling the pulse of the nation, and in order to +do so must know what is being said over the +country, and must frequently visit or communicate +with his constituents. If this difficulty is +experienced by an ordinary private member, it +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_52' name='page_52'></a>52</span> +is greater for a minister whose time is filled +by official duties, or for a leader of Opposition, +who has to be constantly thinking of his tactics +in the House. In Disraeli’s case there was a +keenness of observation and discernment far +beyond the common. But he was under the disadvantages +of not being really an Englishman, +and of having never lived among the people.<a name='FNanchor_0009' id='FNanchor_0009'></a><a href='#Footnote_0009' class='fnanchor'>[10]</a> +The detachment I have already referred to tended +to weaken his power of judging popular sentiment, +and appraising at their true value the various +tendencies that sway and divide a nation so +complex as the English. Early in life he had +formed theories about the relations of the different +classes of English society—nobility, gentry, +capitalists, workmen, peasantry, and the middle +classes—theories which were far from containing +the whole truth; and he adhered to them even +when the changes of half a century had made them +less true. He had a great aversion, not to say contempt, +for Puritanism, and for the Dissenters among +whom it chiefly holds its ground, and pleased himself +with the notion that the extension of the suffrage +which he carried in 1867 had destroyed their +political power. The Conservative victory at the +election of 1874 confirmed him in this belief, and +made him also think that the working classes +were ready to follow the lead of the rich. He +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_53' name='page_53'></a>53</span> +perceived that the Liberal ministry of 1868-74 +had offended certain influential sections by appearing +too demiss or too unenterprising in foreign +affairs, and fancied that the bulk of the nation +would be dazzled by a warlike mien, and an +active, even aggressive, foreign policy. Such a +policy was congenial to his own ideas, and to +the society that surrounded him. It was applauded +by some largely circulated newspapers +which had previously been unfriendly to the +Tory party. Thus he was more surprised than +any other man of similar experience to find the +nation sending up a larger majority against him +in 1880 than it had sent up for him in 1874. +This was the most striking instance of his miscalculation. +But he had all through his career +an imperfect comprehension of the English +people. Individuals, or even an assembly, may +be understood by dint of close and long-continued +observation; but to understand a whole nation, +one must also have sympathy, and this his circumstances, +not less than his character, had denied him.</p> +<p>It was partly the same defect that prevented +him from mastering the general politics of Europe. +There is a sense in which no single man can +pretend to understand Europe. Bismarck himself +did not. The problem is too vast, the facts +to be known too numerous, the undercurrents +too varying. One can speak only of more or +less. If Europe had been in his time what it +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_54' name='page_54'></a>54</span> +was a century before, Disraeli would have had +a far better chance of being fit to become what +it was probably his dearest wish to become—its +guide and arbiter. He would have taken the +measure of the princes and ministers with whom +he had to deal, would have seen and adroitly +played on their weaknesses. His novels show +how often he had revolved diplomatic situations +in his mind, and reflected on the way of handling +them. Foreign diplomatists are agreed that at +the Congress of Berlin he played his part to +admiration, spoke seldom, but spoke always to +the point and with dignity, had a perfect conception +of what he meant to secure, and of the +means he must employ to secure it, never haggled +over details or betrayed any eagerness to win +support, never wavered in his demands, even when +they seemed to lead straight to war. Dealing +with individuals, who represented material forces +which he had gauged, he was perfectly at home, +and deserved the praise he obtained from Bismarck, +who, comparing him with other eminent +figures at the Congress, is reported to have said, +bluntly but heartily, “Der alte Jude, das ist der +Mann.”<a name='FNanchor_0010' id='FNanchor_0010'></a><a href='#Footnote_0010' class='fnanchor'>[11]</a> But to know what the condition of +South-Eastern Europe really was, and understand +how best to settle its troubles, was a far more difficult +task, and Disraeli possessed neither the knowledge +nor the insight required. In the Europe +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_55' name='page_55'></a>55</span> +of to-day, peoples count for more than the wills +of individual rulers: one must comprehend the +passions and sympathies of peoples if one is to +forecast the future. This he seldom cared to +do. He did not realise the part and the power +of moral forces. Down to the outbreak of the +American Civil War he maintained that the +question between the North and the South was +mainly a fiscal question between the Protectionist +interests of the one and the Free Trade interests +of the other. He always treated with contempt +the national movement in Italy. He made no +secret in the days before 1859 of his good-will +to Austria and of his liking for Louis Napoleon—a +man inferior to him in ability and in courage, +but to whose character his own had some affinities. +In that elaborate study of Sir Robert Peel’s character,<a name='FNanchor_0011' id='FNanchor_0011'></a><a href='#Footnote_0011' class='fnanchor'>[12]</a> +which is one of Disraeli’s best literary performances, +he observes that Peel “was destitute +of imagination, and wanting imagination he wanted +prescience.” True it is that imagination is necessary +for prescience, but imagination is not enough +to give prescience. It may even be a snare.</p> +<p>Disraeli’s imagination, his fondness for theories, +and disposition rather to cling to them than to +study and interpret facts, made him the victim +of his own preconceived ideas, as his indolence +deterred him from following the march of change +and noting how different things were in the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_56' name='page_56'></a>56</span> +’seventies from what they had been in the +’thirties. Mr. Gladstone said to me in 1876, +“Disraeli’s two leading ideas in foreign policy +have always been the maintenance of the temporal +power of the Pope, and the maintenance of the +power of the Sultan.” Unable to save the one, he +clung to the hope of saving the other. He was +possessed by the notion, seductive to a dreamy +mind, that all the disturbances of Europe arose +from the action of secret societies; and when the +Eastern Question was in 1875 re-opened by the +insurrection in Herzegovina, followed by the +war of Servia against the Turks, he explained +the event in a famous speech by saying, “The +secret societies of Europe have declared war +against Turkey”—the fact being that the societies +which in Russia were promoting the Servian war +were public societies, openly collecting subscriptions, +while those secret “social democratic” +societies of which we have since heard so much +were strongly opposed to the interference of +Russia, and those other secret societies in the +rest of Europe, wherein Poles and Italians have +played a leading part, were, if not hostile, at any +rate quite indifferent to the movement among the +Eastern Christians.</p> +<p>Against these errors there must be set several +cases in which he showed profound discernment. +In 1843 and 1844 he delivered, in debates on the +condition of Ireland, speeches which then constituted +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_57' name='page_57'></a>57</span> +and long remained the most penetrating +and concise diagnosis of the troubles of that country +ever addressed to Parliament. Ireland has, he +said, a starving peasantry, an alien church, and an +absentee aristocracy, and he went on to add that +the function of statesmanship was to cure by peaceful +and constitutional methods ills which in other +countries had usually induced, and been removed +by, revolution. During the American Civil War of +1861-65, Disraeli was the only leading statesman +on his own side of politics who did not embrace and +applaud the cause of the South. Whether this +arose from a caution that would not commit itself +where it recognised ignorance, or from a perception +of the superior strength of the Northern +States (a perception which whoever visits the +South even to-day is astonished that so few +people in Europe should have had), it is not easy +to decide; but whatever the cause, the fact is an +evidence of his prudence or sagacity all the more +weighty because Lord Palmerston, Lord Russell, +and Mr. Gladstone, as well as Lord Derby and +Sir Hugh Cairns, had each of them expressed +more or less sympathy with, or belief in, the +success of the Southern cause.</p> +<p>The most striking instance, however, of Disraeli’s +insight was his perception that an extension +of the suffrage would not necessarily injure, +and might end by strengthening, the Tory party. +The Act of 1867 was described at the time as +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_58' name='page_58'></a>58</span> +“a leap in the dark.” But Disraeli’s eyes had +pierced the darkness. For half a century politicians +had assumed that the masses of the people +were and would remain under the Liberal banner. +Even as late as 1872 it was thought on Liberal +platforms a good joke to say of some opinion that +it might do for Conservative working men, if there +were any. Disraeli had, long before 1867, seen +deeper, and though his youthful fancies that the +monarchy might be revived as an effective force, +and that “the peasantry” would follow with +mediæval reverence the lead of the landed gentry, +proved illusory, he was right in discerning that +wealth and social influence would in parliamentary +elections count for more among the masses than +the traditions of constitutional Whiggism or the +dogmas of abstract Radicalism.</p> +<p>In estimating his statesmanship as a whole, +one must give due weight to the fact that it +impressed many publicists abroad. No English +minister had for a long time past so fascinated +observers in Germany and Austria. Supposing +that under the long reign of Liberalism Englishmen +had ceased to care for foreign politics, they +looked on him as the man who had given back to +Britain her old European position, and attributed +to him a breadth of design, a grasp and a foresight +such as men had revered in Lord Chatham, +greatest in the short list of ministers who have +raised the fame of England abroad. I remember +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_59' name='page_59'></a>59</span> +seeing in a Conservative club, about 1880, a +large photograph of Lord Beaconsfield, wearing +the well-known look of mysterious fixity, under +which is inscribed the line of Homer: “He alone +is wise: the rest are fleeting shadows.”<a name='FNanchor_0012' id='FNanchor_0012'></a><a href='#Footnote_0012' class='fnanchor'>[13]</a> It +was a happy idea to go for a motto to the +favourite poet of his rival, as it was an unhappy +chance to associate the wisdom ascribed +to Disraeli with his policy in the Turkish East +and in Afghanistan, a policy now universally admitted +to have been unwise and unfortunate.<a name='FNanchor_0013' id='FNanchor_0013'></a><a href='#Footnote_0013' class='fnanchor'>[14]</a> +But whatever may be thought of the appropriateness +of the motto, the fact remains that this was +the belief he succeeded in inspiring. He did it +by virtue of those very gifts which sometimes +brought him into trouble—his taste for large and +imposing theories, his power of clothing them in +vague and solemn language, his persistent faith in +them. He came, by long posing, to impose upon +himself and to believe in his own profundity. +Few people could judge whether his ideas of +imperial policy were sound and feasible; but +every one saw that he had theories, and many +fell under the spell which a grandiose imagination +can exercise. It is chiefly this gift, coupled with +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_60' name='page_60'></a>60</span> +his indomitable tenacity, which lifts him out of +the line of mere party leaders. If he failed to see +how much the English are sometimes moved by +compassion, he did see that it may be worth while +to play to their imagination.</p> +<p>We may now ask again the question asked at +first: How did a man, whatever his natural gifts, +who was weighted in his course by such disadvantages +as Disraeli’s, by his Jewish origin, by the +escapades of his early career, by the want of confidence +which his habitual cynicism inspired, by the +visionary nature of so many of his views,—how did +he, in a conservative and aristocratic country like +England, triumph over so many prejudices and +enmities, and raise himself to be the head of the +Conservative and aristocratic party, the trusted +counsellor of the Crown, the ruler, almost the +dictator, of a free people?</p> +<p>However high be the estimate formed of +Disraeli’s gifts, secondary causes must have been +at work to enable him to overcome the obstacles +that blocked his path. The ancients were not +wrong in ascribing to Fortune a great share in +human affairs. Now, among the secondary causes +of success, that “general minister and leader set +over worldly splendours,” as Dante calls her,<a name='FNanchor_0014' id='FNanchor_0014'></a><a href='#Footnote_0014' class='fnanchor'>[15]</a> +played no insignificant part. One of these causes +lay in the nature of the party to which he belonged. +The Tory party of the years between 1848 and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_61' name='page_61'></a>61</span> +1865 contained a comparatively small number of +able men. When J. S. Mill once called it the +stupid party, it did not repudiate the name, but +pointed to its cohesion and its resolution as +showing how many things besides mere talent +go to make political greatness. A man of +shining gifts had within its ranks few competitors; +and this was signally the case immediately +after Peel’s defection. That statesman +had carried off with him the intellectual flower +of the Conservatives. Those who were left +behind to form the Protectionist Opposition in +the House of Commons were broad-acred squires, +of solid character but slender capacity. Through +this heavy atmosphere Mr. Disraeli rose like a +balloon. Being practically the only member of +his party in the Commons with either strategical +or debating power, he became indispensable, and +soon established a supremacy which years of +patient labour might not have given him in a +rivalry with the distinguished band who surrounded +Peel. During the twenty years that +followed the great Tory schism of 1846 no +man arose in the Tory ranks capable of disputing +his throne. The conspiracies hatched +against him might well have prospered could a +candidate for the leadership have been found +capable of crossing swords with the chieftain in +possession. Fortune, true to her nursling, suffered +none such to appear.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_62' name='page_62'></a>62</span></div> +<p>Another favouring influence not understood +outside England was to be found in the character +of the party he led. In his day the Tories, being +the party of the property-holders, and having not +to advance but to stand still, not to propose +changes but to resist them, having bonds of +interest as well as of sentiment to draw them +close together, possessed a cohesion, a loyalty +to their chiefs, a tenacious corporate spirit, far +exceeding what was to be found among their +adversaries, who were usually divided into a +moderate or Whig and an advanced or Radical +section. He who established himself as the Tory +leader was presently followed by the rank and file +with a devotion, an unquestioning submission and +confidence, which placed his character and doctrines +under the ægis of the party, and enforced loyalty +upon parliamentary malcontents. This corporate +spirit was of infinite value to Disraeli. The +historical past of the great Tory party, its associations, +the social consideration which it enjoys, all +went to ennoble his position and efface the remembrance +of the less creditable parts of his career. +And in the later days of his reign, when no one +disputed his supremacy, every Tory was, as a +matter of course, his advocate and admirer, and +resented assaults on him as insults to the party. +When a man excites hatred by his words or deeds, +attacks on his character are an inevitable relief to +overcharged feelings. Technically regarded, they +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_63' name='page_63'></a>63</span> +are not good politics. Misrepresentation sometimes +succeeds; vituperation seldom. Let a man +be personally untrustworthy or dangerous, still, it +is only his own words that damage him, at least in +England and America. Even his own words, however +discrediting, even his acts, however culpable, +may, if they belong to a past unfamiliar to the voter +of to-day, tell little, perhaps too little, on the voter’s +mind when they are brought up against him. The +average citizen has a short memory, and thinks +that the dead may be allowed to bury their dead.</p> +<p>Let it be further noted that Disraeli’s career +coincided with a significant change in English +politics, a change partly in the temper of the nation, +partly in the balance of voting power. For thirty +years after the Reform Act of 1832, not only had +the middle classes constituted the majority of +the electors, but the social influence of the great +Whig families and the intellectual influence of +the economic school of Cobden had been potent +factors. These forces were, in the later part of +Disraeli’s life, tending to decline. The working-class +vote was vastly increased in 1867. The +old Whig light gradually paled, and many of the +Whig magnates, obeying class sympathies rather +than party traditions, drifted slowly into Toryism. +A generation arose which had not seen the Free +Trade struggle, or had forgotten the Free Trade +arguments, and which was attracted by ideals other +than those which Cobden had preached. The +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_64' name='page_64'></a>64</span> +grievances which had made men reformers had +been largely removed. The battle of liberty and +nationality in Continental Europe had been in +the main won, and Englishmen had lost the +enthusiasm for freedom which had fired them in +the days when the memory of their own struggle +against the Crown and the oligarchy was still +fresh. With none of these changes had Disraeli’s +personal action much to do, but they all enured +to the benefit of his party, they all swelled the +tide which bore him into office in 1874.</p> +<p>Finally, he had the great advantage of living +long. Many a statesman has died at fifty, +and passed from the world’s memory, who might +have become a figure in history with twenty years +more of life. Had Disraeli’s career closed in +1854, he would have been remembered as a +parliamentary gladiator, who had produced a few +incisive speeches, a crude Budget, and some +brilliant social and political sketches. The +stronger parts of his character might have remained +unknown. True it is that a man must +have greatness in order to stand the test of long +life. Some are found out, like Louis Napoleon. +Some lose their balance and therewith their +influence, like Lord Brougham. Some cease to +grow or learn, and if a statesman is not better +at sixty than he was at thirty, he is worse. +Some jog heavily on, like Metternich, or stiffen +into arbitrary doctrinaires, like Guizot. Disraeli +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_65' name='page_65'></a>65</span> +did not merely stand the test, he gained immensely +by it. He gained by rising into a +position where his strength could show itself. +He gained also by so impressing his individuality +upon people as to make them accept it as an +ultimate fact, till at length they came, not so much +to blame him for what he did in accord with his +established reputation, as rather to relish and +enter into the humour of his character. As they +unconsciously took to judging him by a standard +different from that which they applied to ordinary +Englishmen, they hardly complained of deflections +from veracity which would have seemed grave +in other persons. He had given notice that +he was not like other men, that his words must +not be taken in their natural sense, that he was +to be regarded as the skilful player of a great +game, the consummate actor in a great part. +And, once more, he gained by the many years +during which he had opportunities of displaying +his fortitude, patience, constancy under defeat, +unwavering self-confidence—gifts rarer than mere +intellectual power, gifts that deserve the influence +they bestow. Nothing so fascinates mankind as +to see a man equal to every fortune, unshaken +by reverses, indifferent to personal abuse, maintaining +a long combat against apparently hopeless +odds with the sharpest weapons and a smiling +face. His followers fancy he must have hidden +resources of wisdom as well as of courage. When +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_66' name='page_66'></a>66</span> +some of his predictions come true, and the +turning tide of popular feeling begins to bear +them toward power, they believe that he has +been all along right and the rest of the world +wrong. When victory at last settles on his crest, +even his enemies can hardly help applauding a +reward which seems so amply earned. It was +by this quality, more perhaps than by anything +else, by this serene surface with fathomless depths +below, that he laid his spell upon the imagination +of observers in Continental Europe, and received +at his death a sort of canonisation from a large +section of the English people.</p> +<p>What will posterity think of him, and by +what will he be remembered? The glamour has +already passed away, and to few of those who on +the 19th of April deck his statue with flowers +is he more than a name.</p> +<p>Parliamentary fame is fleeting: the memory of +parliamentary conflicts soon grows dim and dull. +Posterity fixes a man’s place in history by asking +not how many tongues buzzed about him in his +lifetime, but how great a factor he was in the +changes of the world, that is, how far different +things would have been twenty or fifty years +after his death if he had never lived. Tried by +this standard, the results upon the course of events +of Disraeli’s personal action are not numerous, +though some of them may be deemed momentous. +He was an adroit parliamentary tactician who +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_67' name='page_67'></a>67</span> +held his followers together through a difficult +time. By helping to keep the Peelites from +rejoining their old party, he gave that party a +colour different from the sober hues which it +had worn during the leadership of Peel. He +became the founder of what has in later days +been called Tory democracy, winning over a +large section of the humbler classes to the +banner under which the majority of the wealthy +and the holders of vested interests already stood +arrayed. He saved for the Turkish Empire +a part of its territories, yet in doing so merely +prolonged for a little the death agony of +Turkish power. Though it cannot be said +that he conferred any benefit on India or the +Colonies, he certainly stimulated the imperial +instincts of Englishmen. He had occasional +flashes of insight, as when in 1843 he perceived +exactly what Ireland needed, and at least one +brilliant flash of foresight when he predicted that +a wide extension of the suffrage would bring no +evil to the Tory party. Yet in the case of +Ireland he did nothing, when the chance came +to him, to give effect to the judgment which he +had formed, while in the case of the suffrage he +did but follow up and carry into effect an impulse +given by others. The Franchise Act of 1867 is +perhaps the only part of his policy which has, +by hastening a change that induced other changes, +permanently affected the course of events; and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_68' name='page_68'></a>68</span> +it remains the chief monument of his parliamentary +skill. There was nothing in his career to +set the example of a lofty soul or a noble purpose. +He did not raise, he may even have lowered, +the tone of English public life.</p> +<p>Yet history will not leave him without a meed +of admiration. When all possible explanations of +his success have been given, what a wonderful +career! An adventurer foreign in race, in +ideas, in temper, without money or family +connections, climbs, by patient and unaided +efforts, to lead a great party, master a powerful +aristocracy, sway a vast empire, and make himself +one of the four or five greatest personal +forces in the world. His head is not turned by +his elevation. He never becomes a demagogue; +he never stoops to beguile the multitude by +appealing to sordid instincts. He retains through +life a certain amplitude of view, a due sense of +the dignity of his position, a due regard for the +traditions of the ancient assembly which he leads, +and when at last the destinies of England fall +into his hands, he feels the grandeur of the +charge, and seeks to secure what he believes to +be her imperial place in the world. Whatever +judgment history may ultimately pass upon +him, she will find in the long annals of the +English Parliament no more striking figure.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_69' name='page_69'></a>69</span> +<a name='DEAN_STANLEY16' id='DEAN_STANLEY16'></a> +<h2>DEAN STANLEY<a name="FNanchor_16" id="FNanchor_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor2">[16]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>In the England of his time there was no personality +more attractive, nor any more characteristic of +the country, than Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, Dean +of Westminster. England is the only European +country in which such a figure could have appeared, +for it is the only country in which a man may hold +a high ecclesiastical post and yet be regarded +by the nation, not specially as an ecclesiastic, but +rather as a distinguished writer, an active and +influential man of affairs, an ornament of social +life. But if in this respect he was typical of his +country, he was in other respects unique. He +was a clergyman untouched by clericalism, a +courtier unspoiled by courts. No one could +point to any one else in England who occupied +a similar position, nor has any one since arisen +who recalls him, or who fills the place which his +departure left empty.</p> +<p>Stanley was born in 1815. His father, then +Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire, afterwards Bishop +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_70' name='page_70'></a>70</span> +of Norwich, belonged to the family of the Stanleys +of Alderley, a branch of that ancient and famous +line the head of which is Earl of Derby. His +mother, Catherine Leycester, was a woman of +much force of character and intellectual power. +He was educated at Rugby School under Dr. +Arnold, the influence of whose ideas remained +great over him all through his life, and at +Oxford, where he became a fellow and tutor +of University College. Passing thence to be +Canon of Canterbury, he returned to the University +as Professor of Ecclesiastical History, +and remained there for seven years. In 1863 +he was appointed Dean of Westminster, and at +the same time married Lady Augusta Bruce +(sister of the then Lord Elgin, Governor-General +first of Canada and afterwards of India). He +died in 1881.</p> +<p>He had an extraordinarily active and busy life, +so intertwined with the history of the University of +Oxford and the history of the Church of England +from 1850 to 1880, that one can hardly think of any +salient point in either without thinking also of +him. Yet it was perhaps rather in the intensity +of his nature and the nobility of his sentiments +than in either the compass or the strength of his +intellectual faculties that the charm and the force +he exercised lay. In some directions he was +curiously deficient. He had no turn for abstract +reasoning, no liking for metaphysics or any other +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_71' name='page_71'></a>71</span> +form of speculation. He was equally unfitted +for scientific inquiry, and could scarcely work +a sum in arithmetic. Indeed, in no field was +he a logical or systematic thinker. Neither, +although he had a retentive memory, and +possessed a great deal of various knowledge on +many subjects, could he be called learned, for +he had not really mastered any branch of history, +and was often inaccurate in details. He had never +been trained to observe facts in natural history. +He had absolutely no ear for music, and very +little perception either of colour or of scent. He +learned foreign languages with difficulty and never +spoke them well. He was so short-sighted as to +be unable to recognise a face passing close in the +street. Yet with these shortcomings he was a +born traveller, went everywhere, saw everything +and everybody worth seeing, always seized on +the most characteristic features of a landscape, or +building, or a person, and described them with a +freshness which made one feel as if they had +never been described before. Of the hundreds +who have published books on the Desert of +Sinai and the Holy Land, many of them skilful +writers or men of profound knowledge, he is +the only one who is still read and likely to continue +to be read, so vivid in colour, so exquisite +in feeling, are the pictures he has given. Nature +alone, however, nature taken by herself, did not +satisfy him, did not, indeed, in his later days (for +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_72' name='page_72'></a>72</span> +in his boyhood he had been a passionate lover of +the mountains) greatly interest him. A building +or a landscape had power to rouse his imagination +and call forth his unrivalled powers of description +only when it was associated with the +thoughts and deeds of men.</p> +<p>The largest part of his literary work was done +in the field of ecclesiastical history, a subject +naturally congenial to him, and to which he was +further drawn by the professorship which he held +at Oxford during a time when a great revival of +historical studies was in progress. It was work +which critics could easily disparage, for there were +many small errors scattered through it; and the +picturesque method of treatment he employed +was apt to pass into scrappiness. He fixed on +the points which had a special interest for his +own mind as illustrating some trait of personal +or national character, or some moral lesson, and +passed hastily over other matters of equal or +greater importance. Nevertheless his work +had some distinctive merits which have not received +from professional critics the whole credit +they deserved. In all that Stanley wrote one +finds a certain largeness and dignity of view. +He had a sense of the unity of history, of the +constant relation of past and present, of the similarity +of human nature in one age and country to +human nature in another; and he never failed to +dwell upon the permanently valuable truths which +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_73' name='page_73'></a>73</span> +history has to teach. Nothing was too small to +attract him, because he discovered a meaning in +everything, and he was therefore never dull, +for even when he moralised he would light up +his reflections by some happy anecdote. With +this he possessed a keen eye, the eye of a +poet, for human character, and a power of +sympathy that enabled him to appreciate even +those whose principles and policy he disliked. +Herein he was not singular, for the sympathetic +style of writing history has become fashionable +among us. What was remarkable in him was +that his sympathy did not betray him into the +error, now also fashionable, of extenuating moral +distinctions. His charity never blunted the edge +of his justice, nor prevented him from reprobating +the faults of the personages who had touched his +heart. For one sin only he had little historical +tolerance—the sin of intolerance. So there was +one sin only which ever led him to speak severely +of any of his contemporaries—the sin of untruthfulness. +Being himself so simple and straightforward +as to feel his inability to cope with +deceitful men, deceit incensed him. But he did not +resent the violence of his adversaries, for though +he suffered much at their hands he knew many +of them to be earnest, unselfish, and conscientious +men.</p> +<p>His pictures of historical scenes are admirable, +for with his interest in the study of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_74' name='page_74'></a>74</span> +character there went a large measure of dramatic +power. Nothing can be better in its way +than the description of the murder of St. +Thomas of Canterbury given in the <i>Memorials +of Canterbury</i>, which, after <i>Sinai and Palestine</i> +and the <i>Life of Arnold</i>, may be deemed +the best of Stanley’s books. Whether he +could, with more leisure for careful thought +and study, have become a great historian, was +a question which those of us who were dazzled +by his Public Lectures at Oxford used often +to discuss. The leisure never came, for he +was throughout life warmly interested in every +current ecclesiastical question, and ready to +bear a part in discussing it, either in the +press—for he wrote in the <i>Edinburgh Review</i>, +and often sent letters to the <i>Times</i> under +the signature of “Anglicanus”—or in Convocation, +where he had a seat during the latter +part of his career. These interruptions not +only checked the progress of his studies, but +gave to his compositions an air of haste, which +made them seem to want system and finish. The +habit of rapid writing for magazines or other +ephemeral purposes is alleged to tell injuriously +upon literary men: it told the more upon Stanley +because he was also compelled to produce sermons +rapidly. Now sermon-writing, while it breeds a +tendency to the making of rhetorical points, subordinates +the habit of dispassionate inquiry to the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_75' name='page_75'></a>75</span> +enforcement of a moral lesson. Stanley, who +had a touch of the rhetorical temperament, and +was always eager to improve an occasion, certainly +suffered in this way. When he brings out a general +truth he is not content with it as a truth, but +seeks to turn it also to edification, or to make +it illustrate and support some view for which he +is contending at the time. When he is simply +describing, he describes rather as a dramatic artist +working for effect than as a historian solely +anxious to represent men and events as they +were. Yet if we consider how much a historian +gains, not only from an intimate knowledge of +his own time, but also, and even more +largely, from playing an active part in the +events of his own time, from swaying opinion by +his writings and his speeches, from sitting in +assemblies and organising schemes of attack and +defence, we may hesitate to wish that Stanley’s +time had been more exclusively given to quiet +investigation. The freshness of his historical +portraits is notably due to the sense he carried +about with him of moving in history and being +a part of it. He never mounted his pulpit +in the Abbey or walked into the Jerusalem +Chamber when Convocation was sitting without +feeling that he was about to do something which +might possibly be recorded in the annals of his +country. I remember his mentioning, to illustrate +undergraduate ignorance, that once when he was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_76' name='page_76'></a>76</span> +going to give a lecture to his class, he suddenly +recollected that Mr. Goldwin Smith, then Regius +Professor of Modern History, was announced to +deliver a public lecture at the same hour. Telling +the class that they would be better employed in +hearing Mr. Goldwin Smith than himself, he led +them all there. The next time the class met, +one of them, after making some acute comments +on the lecture, asked who the lecturer was. “I +was amazed,” said Stanley, “that an intelligent +man should ask such a question, and then it +occurred to me that probably he did not know +who I was either.” There was nothing of personal +vanity or self-importance in this. All the +men of mark among whom he moved were to him +historical personages, and he would describe to +his friends some doing or saying of a contemporary +statesman or ecclesiastic with the same +eagerness, the same sense of its being a fact to +be noted and remembered, as the rest of us feel +about a personal anecdote relating to Oliver +Cromwell or Cardinal Richelieu.</p> +<p>His sermons, like nearly all good sermons, will +be inadequately appreciated by those who now +peruse them, not only because they were composed +for a given audience with special reference to the +circumstances of the time, but also because the +best of them gained so much by his impassioned +delivery. They were all read from manuscript, and +his handwriting was so illegible that it was a marvel +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_77' name='page_77'></a>77</span> +how he contrived to read them. I once asked +him, not long after he had been promoted to the +Deanery of Westminster, whether he found it +easy to make himself heard in the enormous nave +of the Abbey church. His frame, it ought to +be stated, was spare as well as small, and his +voice not powerful. He answered: “That depends +on whether I am interested in what I +am saying. If the sermon is on something +which interests me deeply I can fill the nave; +otherwise I cannot.” When he had got a worthy +theme, or one which stimulated his own emotions, +the power of his voice and manner was wonderful. +His tiny body seemed to swell, his chest +vibrated as he launched forth glowing words. +The farewell sermon he delivered when quitting +Oxford for Westminster lives in the memory of +those who heard it as a performance of extraordinary +power, the power springing from the +intensity of his own feeling. No sermon has +ever since so moved the University.</p> +<p>He was by nature shy and almost timid, and he +was not supposed to possess any gift for extempore +speaking. But when in his later days he found +himself an almost solitary champion in Convocation +of the principles of universal toleration and +comprehension which he held, he developed a debating +power which surprised himself as well as +his friends. It was to him a matter of honour and +conscience to defend his principles, and to defend +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_78' name='page_78'></a>78</span> +them all the more zealously because he stood +alone on their behalf in a hostile assembly. His +courage was equal to the occasion, and his faculties +responded to the call his courage made.</p> +<p>In civil politics he was all his life a Liberal, belonging +by birth to the Whig aristocracy, and disposed +on most matters to take rather the Whiggish +than the Radical view, yet drawn by the warmth +of his sympathy towards the working classes, +and popular with them. One of his chief +pleasures was to lead parties of humble visitors +round the Abbey on public holidays. Like most +members of the Whig families, he had no great +liking for Mr. Gladstone, not so much, perhaps, +on political grounds as because he distrusted the +High Churchism and anti-Erastianism of the +Liberal leader. However, he never took any +active part in general politics, reserving his +strength for those ecclesiastical questions which +seemed to lie within his peculiar province.<a name='FNanchor_0015' id='FNanchor_0015'></a><a href='#Footnote_0015' class='fnanchor'>[17]</a> +Here he had two leading ideas: one, that the +Church of England must at all hazards continue +to be an Established Church, in alliance with, or +subjection to, the State (for his Erastianism was +unqualified), and recognising the Crown as her +head; the other, that she must be a comprehensive +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_79' name='page_79'></a>79</span> +Church, finding room in her bosom for +every sort or description of Christian, however +much or little he believed of the dogmas contained +in the Thirty-nine Articles and the Prayer-Book, +to which she is bound by statute. The +former view cut him off from the Nonconformists +and the Radicals; the latter exposed him to the fire +not only of those who, like the High Churchmen +and the Evangelicals, attach the utmost importance +to these dogmas, but of those also among +the laity who hold that a man ought under no +circumstances to sign any test or use any form of +prayer which does not express his own convictions. +Stanley would, of course, have greatly preferred +that the laws which regulate the Church of England +should be so relaxed as to require little or +no assent to any doctrinal propositions from her +ministers. He strove for this; and he continued +to hope that this might be ultimately won. But +he conceived that in the meantime it was a less +evil that men should be technically bound by +subscriptions they objected to than that the +National Church should be narrowed by the +exclusion of those whose belief fell short of her +dogmatic standards. It was remarkable that +not only did he maintain this unpopular view of +his with unshaken courage on every occasion, +pleading the cause of every supposed heretic +against hostile majorities with a complete forgetfulness +of his own peace and ease, but that no +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_80' name='page_80'></a>80</span> +one ever thought of attributing the course he +took to any selfish or sinister motive. It was +generally believed that his own opinions were +what nine-tenths of the Church of England would +call unorthodox. But the honesty and uprightness +of his character were so patent that nobody +supposed that this fact made any difference, or +that it was for the sake of keeping his own place +that he fought the cause of others.</p> +<p>What his theological opinions were it might +have puzzled Stanley himself to explain. His +mind was not fitted to grasp abstract propositions. +His historical imagination and his early +associations attached him to the doctrines of the +Nicene Creed; but when he came to talk of +Christianity, he laid so much more stress on +its ethics than on its dogmatic side that his +clerical antagonists thought he held no creed at +all. Dr. Pusey once said that he and Stanley did +not worship the same God. The point of difference +between him and them was not so much that he +consciously disbelieved the dogmas they held—probably +he did not—as that he did not, like them, +think that true religion and final salvation depended +on believing them. And the weak point in his +imagination was that he seemed never to understand +their position, nor to realise how sacred and +how momentous to them were statements which +he saw in a purely imaginative light. He never +could be got to see that a Church without any +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_81' name='page_81'></a>81</span> +dogmas would not be a Church at all in the sense +either of mankind in the past or of mankind in +the present. An anecdote was current that once +when he had in Disraeli’s presence been descanting +on the harm done by the enforcement of dogmatic +standards, Disraeli had observed, “But pray +remember, Mr. Dean, no dogma, no Dean.”</p> +<p>Those who thought him a heathen would have +assailed him less bitterly if he had been content +to admit his own differences from them. What +most incensed them was his habit of assuming +that, except in mere forms of expression, there +were really no differences at all, and that they +also held Christianity to consist not in any body +of doctrines, but in reverence for God and purity +of life. They would have preferred heathenism +itself to this kind of Universalism.</p> +<p>As ecclesiastical preferment had not discoloured +the native hue of his simplicity, so neither did the +influences of royal favour. It says little for +human nature that few people should be proof +against what the philosopher deems the trivial +and fleeting fascinations of a court. Stanley’s +elevation of mind was proof. Intensely interested +in the knowledge of events passing behind the +scenes which his relations with the reigning family +opened to him, he scarcely ever referred to those +relations, and seemed neither to be affected +thereby, nor to care a whit more for the pomps +and vanities of power or wealth, a whit less for +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_82' name='page_82'></a>82</span> +the friends and the causes he had learned to value +in his youth.</p> +<p>In private, that which most struck one in his +intellect was the quick eagerness with which his +imagination fastened upon any new fact, caught +its bearings, and clothed it with colour. His +curiosity remained inexhaustible. His delight in +visiting a new country was like that of an +American scholar landing for the first time in +Europe. A friend met him a year before his +death at a hotel in the North of England, +and found he was going to the Isle of Man. +He had mastered its geography and history, +and talked about it and what he was to +explore there as one might talk of Rome or +Athens when visiting them for the first time. +When anybody told him an anecdote his susceptible +imagination seized upon points which the +narrator had scarcely noticed, and discovered a +whole group of curious analogies from other times +or countries. Whatever you planted in this fertile +soil struck root and sprouted at once. Morally, +he impressed those who knew him not only by +his kindness of heart, but by a remarkable +purity and nobleness of aim. Nothing mean or +small or selfish seemed to harbour in his mind. +You might think him right or wrong, but you +never doubted that he was striving after the +truth. He was not merely a just man; he +loved justice with passion. It was partly, perhaps, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_83' name='page_83'></a>83</span> +because justice, goodness, honour, charity, +seemed to him of such paramount importance in +life that he made little of doctrinal differences, +having perceived that these virtues may exist, and +may also be found wanting, in every form of +religious creed or philosophical profession. When +the Convocation of the Anglican Church met at +Westminster, it was during many years his habit +to invite a great number of its leading members to +the deanery, the very men who had been attacking +him most hotly in debate, and who would +go on denouncing his latitudinarianism till Convocation +met again. They yielded—sometimes +reluctantly, but still they yielded—to the kindliness +of his nature and the charm of his +manner. He used to dart about among them, +introducing opponents to one another, as indeed +on all occasions he delighted to bring the most +diverse people together, so that some one said +the company you met at the deanery were either +statesmen and duchesses or starving curates and +briefless barristers.</p> +<p>He had on the whole a happy life. It is +true that the intensity of his attachments exposed +him to correspondingly intense grief when he +lost those who were dearest to him; true also +that, being by temperament a man of peace, he +was during the latter half of his life almost constantly +at war. But his home, first in the lifetime +of his mother and then in that of his wife, had +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_84' name='page_84'></a>84</span> +a serene and unclouded brightness; and the care +of the Abbey, rich with the associations of nearly +a thousand years of history, provided a function +which exactly suited him and which constituted +a never-failing source of enjoyment. To dwell in +the centre of the life of the Church of England, +and to dwell close to the Houses of Parliament, +in the midst of the making of history, knowing +and seeing those who were principally concerned +in making it, was in itself a pleasure to his +quenchless historical curiosity. His cheerfulness +and animation, although to some extent revived +by his visit to America and the reception he met +with there, were never the same after his wife’s +death in 1876. But the sweetness of his disposition +and his affection for his friends knew +no diminution. He remembered everything that +concerned them; was always ready with sympathy +in sorrow or joy; and gave to all alike, +high or low, famous or unknown, the same impression, +that his friendship was for themselves, +and not for any gifts or rank or other worldly +advantage they might enjoy. The art of friendship +is the greatest art in life. To enjoy his was +to be educated in that art.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_85' name='page_85'></a>85</span> +<a name='THOMAS_HILL_GREEN' id='THOMAS_HILL_GREEN'></a> +<h2>THOMAS HILL GREEN</h2> +</div> +<p>The name of Thomas Green, Professor of Moral +Philosophy in the University of Oxford, was not, +during his lifetime, widely known outside the +University itself. But he is still remembered by +students of metaphysics and ethics as one of the +most vigorous thinkers of his time; and his personality +was a striking one, which made a deep +and lasting impression on those with whom he +came in contact.</p> +<p>He was born in Yorkshire in 1836, the son +of a country clergyman; was educated at Rugby +School and at Balliol College, Oxford, of which +he became a fellow in 1860, and a tutor in 1869. +In 1867 he was an unsuccessful candidate for a +chair of philosophy at St. Andrews, and in 1878 +was elected Professor of Moral Philosophy in his +own University, which he never thereafter quitted. +He was married in 1869 and died in 1882. It +was a life externally uneventful, but full of +thought and work, and latterly crowned by great +influence over the younger and great respect from +the senior members of the University.</p> +<p>I can best describe Green as he was in his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_86' name='page_86'></a>86</span> +undergraduate days, for it was then that I saw +most of him. His appearance was striking, +and made him a familiar figure even to those +who did not know him personally. Thick +black hair, a sallow complexion, dark eyebrows, +deep-set eyes of rich brown with a peculiarly +steadfast look, were the features which first +struck one; and with these there was a remarkable +seriousness of expression, an air of +solidity and quiet strength. He knew comparatively +few people, and of these only a very few +intimately, having no taste or turn for those +sports in which university acquaintances are most +frequently made, and seldom appearing at breakfast +or wine parties. This caused him to pass +for harsh or unsocial; and I remember having +felt a slight sense of alarm the first time I found +myself seated beside him. Though we belonged +to different colleges I had heard a great deal +about him, for Oxford undergraduates are warmly +interested in one another, and at the time I am +recalling they had an inordinate fondness for +measuring the intellectual gifts and conjecturing +the future of those among their contemporaries +who seemed likely to attain eminence.</p> +<p>Those who came to know Green intimately, +soon perceived that under his reserve there +lay not only a capacity for affection—no +man was more tenacious in his friendships—but +qualities that made him an attractive companion. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_87' name='page_87'></a>87</span> +His tendency to solitude sprang less +from pride or coldness, than from the occupation +of his mind by subjects which seldom weigh on +men of his age. He had, even when a boy +at school (where he lived much by himself, but +exercised considerable moral influence), been +grappling with the problems of metaphysics and +theology, and they had given a tinge of gravity +to his manner. The relief to that gravity lay in +his humour, which was not only abundant but +genial and sympathetic. It used to remind us +of Carlyle—he had both the sense of humour +and an underlying Puritanism in common with +Carlyle, one of the authors who (with Milton +and Wordsworth) had most influenced him—but +in Green the Puritan tinge was more kindly, +and, above all, more lenient to ordinary people. +While averse, perhaps too severely averse, to +whatever was luxurious or frivolous in undergraduate +life, he had the warmest interest in, and +the strongest sympathy for, the humbler classes. +Loving social equality, and filled with a sense of +the dignity of simple human nature, he liked to +meet farmers and tradespeople on their own level, +and knew how to do so without seeming to condescend; +indeed nothing pleased him better, than +when they addressed him as one of themselves, +the manner of his talk to them, as well as the +extreme plainness of his dress, conducing to such +mistakes. The belief in the duty of approaching +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_88' name='page_88'></a>88</span> +the people directly and getting them to think and +to form and express their own views in their own +way was at the root of all his political doctrines.</p> +<p>Though apt to be silent in general company, +no one could be more agreeable when +you were alone with him. We used to say +of him—and his seniors said the same—that +one never talked to him without carrying +away something to ponder over. On everything +he said or wrote there was stamped the +impress of a strong individuality, a mind that +thought for itself, a character ruggedly original, +wherein grimness was mingled with humour, and +practical shrewdness with a love for abstract +speculation. His independence appeared even in +the way he pursued his studies. With abilities of +the highest order, he cared comparatively little +for the distinctions which the University offers; +choosing rather to follow out his own line of +reading in the way he judged permanently useful +than to devote himself to the pursuit of honours +and prizes.</p> +<p>He was constitutionally lethargic, found it hard +to rouse himself to exertion, and was apt to let +himself be driven to the last moment in finishing +a piece of work. There was a rule in his College +that an essay should be given in every Friday +evening. His was, to the great annoyance of +the dons, never ready till Saturday. But when +it did go in, it was the weightiest and most +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_89' name='page_89'></a>89</span> +thoughtful, as well as the most eloquent, that the +College produced. This indolence had one good +result. It disposed him to brood over subjects, +while others were running quickly through many +books and getting up subjects for examination. +It contributed to that depth and systematic +quality which struck us in his thinking, and +made him seem mature beside even the ablest +of his contemporaries. When others were +being, so to speak, blown hither and thither, +picking up and fascinated by new ideas, which +they did not know how to fit in with their old +ones, he seemed to have already formed for himself, +at least in outline, a scheme of philosophy and +life coherent and complete. There was nothing +random or scattered in his ideas; his mind, like +his style of writing, which ran into long and complicated +sentences, had a singular connectedness. +You felt that all its principles were in relation with +one another. This maturity in his mental attitude +gave him an air of superiority, just as the +strength of his convictions gave a dogmatic quality +to his deliverances. Yet in spite of positiveness +and tenacity he had the saving grace of a humility +which distrusted human nature in himself at least +as much as he distrusted it in others. Leading +an introspective life, he had many “wrestlings,” +and often seemed conscious of the struggle between +the natural man and the spiritual man, as +described in the Epistle to the Romans.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_90' name='page_90'></a>90</span></div> +<p>In these early days, before, and to a less +extent after, taking his degree, he used to +speak a good deal, mostly on political topics, +at the University Debating Society, where so +many generations of young men have sharpened +their wits upon one another. His speaking +was vigorous, shrewd, and full of matter, yet +it could not be called popular. It was, in a +certain sense, too good for a debating society, +too serious, and without the dash and sparkle +which tell upon audiences of that kind. Sometimes, +however, and notably in a debate on the +American War of Secession in 1863, he produced, +by the concentrated energy of his language and +the fierce conviction with which he spoke, a +powerful effect.<a name='FNanchor_0016' id='FNanchor_0016'></a><a href='#Footnote_0016' class='fnanchor'>[18]</a> In a business assembly, discussing +practical questions, he would soon have +become prominent, and would have been capable +on occasions of an oratorical success.</p> +<p>Retired as was Green’s life, he became by +degrees more and more widely known beyond the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_91' name='page_91'></a>91</span> +circle of his own intimates; and became also, I +think, more willing to make new friends. His +truthfulness appeared in this that, though powerful +in argument, he did not argue for victory. +When he felt the force of what was urged against +him, his admissions were candid. Thus people +came to respect his character, with its high sense +of duty, its simplicity, its uprightness, its earnest +devotion to an ideal, even more than they admired +his intellectual powers. I remember one friend of +my own, himself eminent in undergraduate Oxford, +and belonging to another college, between which +and Green’s there existed much rivalry, who, +having been defeated by Green in competition +for a University prize, said, “If it had been +any one else, I should have been vexed, but I +don’t mind being beaten by a man I respect so +much.” My friend knew Green very slightly, +and had been at one time strongly prejudiced +against him by rumours of his heterodox opinions.</p> +<p>So much for those undergraduate days on +which recollection loves to dwell, but which were +not days of unmixed happiness to Green, for his +means were narrow and the future rose cloudy +before him. When anxiety was removed by the +income which a fellowship secured, he still hesitated +as to his course in life. At one time he +thought of journalism, or of seeking a post in the +Education Office. More frequently his thoughts +turned to the clerical profession. His theological +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_92' name='page_92'></a>92</span> +opinions would not have permitted him to enter +the service of the Church of England, but he +did seriously consider whether he should become +a Unitarian minister. It was not till he found +that his college needed him as a teacher that +these difficulties came to an end. Similarly he +had doubted whether to devote himself to history, +to theology, or to metaphysics. For history +he had unquestionable gifts. With no exceptional +capacity for mastering or retaining facts, +he had a remarkable power of penetrating at once +to the dominant facts, of grasping their connection, +and working out their consequences. He had also +a keen sense of the dramatic aspect of events, and +a turn, not unlike Carlyle’s, partly perhaps formed +on Carlyle, of fastening on the details in which +character shows itself, and illumining narrative by +personal touches. On the problems of theology +he had meditated even at school, and after taking +his degree he set himself to a systematic study of +the German critics, and I remember that when +we were living together at Heidelberg he had +begun to prepare a translation of C. F. Baur’s +principal treatise. As he worked slowly, the translation +was never finished. Though not professing +to be an adherent of the Tübingen school, +he had been fascinated by Baur’s ingenuity and +constructive power.</p> +<p>Ultimately he settled down to metaphysical +and ethical inquiries, and devoted to these the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_93' name='page_93'></a>93</span> +last thirteen years of his life. During his undergraduate +years the two intellectual forces most +powerful at Oxford had been the writings of +J. H. Newman in the religious sphere, though +their influence was already past its meridian, and +the writings of John Stuart Mill in the sphere +of logic and philosophy. By neither of these, +save in the way of antagonism, had Green been +influenced. He heartily hated all the Utilitarian +school, and had an especial scorn for Buckle, who, +now almost forgotten, enjoyed in those days, as +being supposed to be a philosophic historian, a brief +term of popularity. Green had been led by Carlyle +to the Germans, and his philosophic thinking was +determined chiefly by Kant and Hegel, more +perhaps by the former than by the latter, for it +was always upon ethical rather than upon purely +metaphysical problems that his mind was bent. +His religious vein and his hold upon practical +life made him more interested in morals than +in abstract speculation. Thus he became the +leader in Oxford of a new philosophic school +which looked to Kant as its master, and which +for a time, partly perhaps because it effectively +attacked the school of Mill, received the adhesion +of some among the most thoughtful of the younger +High Churchmen. Like Kant, he set himself to +answer David Hume, and the essay prefixed to +his edition of Hume’s <i>Treatise on Human Nature</i>. +along with his <i>Prolegomena to Ethics</i>, are the only +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_94' name='page_94'></a>94</span> +books in which his doctrines have been given to +the world, for he did not live to write the more +systematic exposition he had planned. These +two essays are hard reading, for his philosophical +style was usually technical, and sometimes verged +on obscurity. But when he wrote on less abstruse +matters he was intelligible as well as weighty, full +of thought, and with an occasional underglow +of restrained eloquence. The force of character +and convictions makes itself felt through the +language.</p> +<p>His mind, though constructive, was not, having +regard to its general power, either fertile or +versatile. Like most of those who prefer solitary +musings to the commerce of men, he had little +facility, and found it hard to express his thoughts +in any other words than those into which his +musings had first flowed. Thus even his oral +teaching was not easy to follow. An anecdote was +current how when one day he had been explaining +to a small class his theory of the origin of our +ideas, the class listened in rapt attention to +his forcible rhetoric, admiring each sentence as +it fell, and thinking that all their difficulties +were being removed. When he ended they +expressed their gratitude for the pleasure he +had given them, and were quitting the room, +when one, halting at the door, said timidly, +“But, Mr. Green, what did you say was really +the origin of our ideas?” However, whether +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_95' name='page_95'></a>95</span> +they were or were not capable of assimilating +his doctrines, his pupils all joined in their respect +for him. They felt the loftiness of his character, +they recognised the fervour of his belief. He +was the most powerful ethical influence, and +perhaps also the most stimulative intellectual +influence, that in those years played upon the +minds of the ablest youth of the University. +But it was a singular fact, which those who +have never lived in Oxford or Cambridge may +find it hard to understand, that when he rose +from the post of a college tutor to that of a +University professor, his influence declined, not +that his powers or his earnestness waned, but +because as a professor he had fewer auditors +and less personal relation with them than he +had commanded as a college teacher. Such is +the working of the collegiate system in Oxford, +curiously unfortunate when it deprives the ablest +men, as they rise naturally to the highest positions, +of the opportunities for usefulness they had previously +enjoyed.</p> +<p>As his powers developed and came to be +recognised, so did those slight asperities which +had been observed in undergraduate days soften +down and disappear. Though he lived a retired +life, his work brought him into contact with +a good many people, and he became more +genial in general company. I remember his +saying with a smile when I had lured him into +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_96' name='page_96'></a>96</span> +Wales for a short excursion, “I don’t know +whether it is a sign of declining virtue, but I find +as I grow older that I am less and less fond of +my own company.” From the first he had won +the confidence and affection of his pupils. Many of +them used long afterwards to say that his conduct +and his teaching had been the one great example +or one great influence they had found and felt in +Oxford. The unclouded happiness of his married +life made it easier for him to see the bright side of +things, and he could not but enjoy the sense that +the seed he sowed was falling on ground fit to +receive it. Even when ill-health had fastened +on him, and was checking both his studies and +his public work, it did not affect the evenness of +his temper nor sharpen the edge of his judgments +of others. In earlier days these had been sometimes +austere, though expressed in temperate and +measured terms.</p> +<p>I must not forget to add that although +Green’s opinions were by no means orthodox, the +influence he exerted while he remained a college +tutor was in large measure a religious influence. +As the clergyman used to be in the English Universities +less of a clergyman than he was anywhere +else, so conversely it caused no surprise there that +a lay teacher should concern himself with the +religious life of his pupils. Green, however, did +more, for he on two occasions at least delivered +to his pupils, before the celebration of the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_97' name='page_97'></a>97</span> +communion in the college chapel, addresses which +were afterwards privately printed, and which present +his view of the relations of ethics and religion +in a way impressive even to those who may find +it hard to follow the philosophical argument.</p> +<p>Metaphysicians are generally as little interested +in practical politics as poets are, and not better +suited for political life. Green was a remarkable +exception. Politics were in a certain sense the +strongest of his interests. To him metaphysics +were not only the basis of theology, but also the +basis of politics. Everything was to converge +on the free life of the individual in a free State; +rational faith and reason inspired by emotion +were to have their perfect work in making the +good citizen.</p> +<p>His interest in politics was perhaps less +active in later years than it had been in his +youth, but his principles stood unchanged. He +was a thoroughgoing Liberal, or what used to be +called a Radical, full of faith in the people, an +advocate of pretty nearly every measure that +tended to democratise English institutions, a +friend of peace and of non-intervention. In +our days he would have been called a Little +Englander, for though his ideal of national life +was lofty, the wellbeing of the masses was to +him a more essential part of that ideal than any +extension of territory or power. He once said +that he would rather see the flag of England +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_98' name='page_98'></a>98</span> +trailed in the dirt than add sixpence to the taxes +that weigh upon the poor. In foreign politics +Louis Napoleon, as the corrupter of France and +the disturber of Europe, was his favourite aversion; +in home politics, Lord Palmerston, as the +chief obstacle to parliamentary reform. The +statesman whom he most admired and trusted +was Mr. Bright. A strong sense of civic duty +led him to enter the City Council of Oxford, +although he could ill spare from his study and +his lecture-room the time which the discharge of +municipal duties required. He was the first tutor +who had ever offered himself to a ward for election. +The townsfolk, between whom and the University +there had generally been little love, the former +thinking themselves looked down upon by the +latter, warmly appreciated his action in coming +out of his seclusion to help them, and his influence +in the Council contributed to secure some useful +reforms, among others, the establishment of a +“grammar” or secondary school for the city.</p> +<p>One of the last things he wrote was a short +pamphlet on freedom of contract, intended to +justify the interference with bargains between +landlord and tenant which was proposed by Mr. +Gladstone’s Irish Land Bill of 1881. It is a +vigorous piece of reasoning, which may still be +read with interest in respect of its application +of philosophical principles to a political controversy. +Had he desired it he might have gone +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_99' name='page_99'></a>99</span> +to the House of Commons as member for the city +of Oxford. But he had found in the Council a +field for local public work, and apart from his +constitutional indolence and his declining health, +he had concluded that his first duty lay in expounding +his philosophical system.</p> +<p>Green will be long remembered in the English +Universities as the strongest force in the sphere +of ethical philosophy that they have seen in the +second half of the nineteenth century, and remembered +also as a singular instance of a metaphysician +with a bent towards politics and practical +life, no less than as a thinker far removed from +orthodoxy who exerted over orthodox Christians +a potent and inspiring religious influence.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_100' name='page_100'></a>100</span> +<a name='ARCHBISHOP_TAIT19' id='ARCHBISHOP_TAIT19'></a> +<h2>ARCHBISHOP TAIT<a name="FNanchor_19" id="FNanchor_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor2">[19]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>England is now the only Protestant country in +which bishops retain some relics of the dignity +and influence which belonged to the episcopal +office during the Middle Ages. Even in Roman +Catholic countries they have been sadly shorn +of their ancient importance, though the prelates +of Hungary still hold vast possessions, while in +France, or Spain, or the Catholic parts of +Germany a man of eminent talents and energy +may occasionally use his official position to become, +through his influence over Catholic electors +or Catholic deputies, a considerable political +factor. This happens even in the United States +and Canada, though in the United States the +general feeling that religion must be kept out of +politics obliges ecclesiastics to use their spiritual +powers cautiously and sparingly. England stands +alone in the fact that although the Protestant +Episcopal Church is, in so far as she is established +by law, the creature and subject of the State, +she is nevertheless so far independent as a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_101' name='page_101'></a>101</span> +religious organisation that she retains a greater +power than in other Protestant nations. State +establishment, though it may have depressed, has +not stifled her ecclesiastical life, and an interest +in ecclesiastical questions is shown by a larger +proportion of her laity than one finds in Germany +or the Scandinavian kingdoms. A man of shining +parts has, as an English bishop, a wide field of +action and influence open to him outside the +sphere of theology or of purely official duty. And +the opportunities of the position attain their maximum +when he reaches the primatial chair of +Canterbury, which is now the oldest and the most +dignified of all the metropolitan sees in countries +that have accepted the Reformation of the sixteenth +century.</p> +<p>Ever since there was a bishop at Canterbury +at all, that is to say, ever since the conversion of +the English began in the seventh century of our +era, the holder of that see has been the greatest +ecclesiastical personage in these islands, with a +recognised authority over all England, as well +as an influence and dignity to which, in the +Middle Ages, the Archbishops of Armagh and +St. Andrews (primates of the Irish and Scottish +Churches) practically bowed, even while refusing +to admit his legal supremacy. To be the most +highly placed and officially the most powerful +man in the churches of Britain, in days when +the Church was better organised, and in some +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_102' name='page_102'></a>102</span> +ways stronger, than the State, meant a vast deal. +The successor of Augustine was often called a +Pope of his own world—that world of Britain +which lay apart from the larger world of the +European continent. Down to the Reformation, +the English primates possessed a power which +made some of them almost a match for the +English kings. Dunstan, Lanfranc, Anselm, +Thomas (Becket), Hubert, Stephen Langton, +Arundel, Warham, were among the foremost +statesmen of their time. After Henry VIII.’s +breach with Rome, the Primate of England received +some access of dignity in becoming independent +of the Pope; but, in reality, the loss +of church power and church wealth which the +Reformation caused lowered his political importance. +In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, +however, there were still some conspicuous and +influential prelates at Canterbury—Cranmer, Pole, +Whitgift, and Laud the best remembered among +them. After the Revolution of 1688, a time of +smaller men begins. The office retained its +dignity as the highest place open to a subject, +ranking above the Lord Chancellor or the Lord +President of the Council, but the Church of +England, having no fightings within, nor anything +to fear from without, was lapped in placid +ease, so it mattered comparatively little who her +chief pastor was.</p> +<p>Bishoprics were in those days regarded chiefly +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_103' name='page_103'></a>103</span> +as pieces of rich preferment with which prime +ministers bought the support of powerful adherents. +But since the middle of the nineteenth +century, as the Anglican Church has become at +once more threatened and more energetic, as +more of the life of the nation has flowed into +her and round her, the office of a bishop +has risen in importance. People show more +interest in the appointments to be made, and +ministers have become proportionately careful +in making them. Bishops work harder and are +more in the public eye now than they were +eighty, or even fifty, years ago. They have +lost something of the antique dignity and social +consideration which they enjoyed. They no +longer wear wigs or ride in State coaches. They +may be seen in third-class railway carriages, +or sitting on the tops of omnibuses. But they +have gained by having countless opportunities +opened up to them for exerting influence in +philanthropic as well as in religious movements; +and the more zealous among them turn these +opportunities to excellent account.</p> +<p>Whatever is true of an ordinary bishop is true +<i>a fortiori</i> of the Archbishop of Canterbury. He +is still a great personage, but he is great in a new +way, with less of wealth and power but larger +opportunities of influence. He is also a kind +of Pope in a new way, because he is the central +figure of the Anglican communion over the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_104' name='page_104'></a>104</span> +whole world, with no legal jurisdiction outside +England (except in India), but far over-topping +all the prelates of that communion in the United +States or the British Colonies. Less deference is +paid to the office, considered simply as an office, +than it received in the Middle Ages, because +society and thought have been tinged by the +spirit of democratic equality, and people realise +that offices are only artificial creations, whose +occupants are human beings like themselves. But +if he is himself a man of ability and force, he may +make his headship of an ancient and venerated +church a vantage-ground whence to address the +nation as well as the members of his own communion. +He is sure of being listened to, which is +of itself no small matter in a country where many +voices are striving to make themselves heard at +the same time. The world takes his words into +consideration; the newspapers repeat them. His +position gives him easy access to the ministers of +the Crown, and implies a confidential intercourse +with the Crown itself. He is, or can be, “in +touch” with all the political figures who can in +any way influence the march of events, and is +able to enforce his views upon them. All his +conduct is watched by the nation; so that if it +is discreet, provident, animated by high and +consistent principle, he gets full credit for +whatever he does well, and acquires that influence +to which masses of men are eager to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_105' name='page_105'></a>105</span> +bow whenever they can persuade themselves +that it is deserved. During the first half of +the nineteenth century the English people was +becoming more interested in ecclesiastical and in +theological matters than it had been during the +century preceding. It grew by slow degrees +more inclined to observe ecclesiastical persons, +to read and think about theological subjects, to +reflect upon the relations which the Church +ought to bear to civil life and moral progress. +Thus a leader of the Church of England +became relatively a more important factor than +he had been a century ago, and an archbishop, +strong by his character, rectitude, and +powers of utterance, rose to occupy a more +influential, if not more conspicuous, position than +his predecessors in the days of the Georges had +done.</p> +<p>These changes naturally made the selection +of an archbishop a more delicate and troublesome +business than it was in those good old +days. Nobody then blamed a Prime Minister +for preferring an aspirant who had the support +of powerful political connections. Blameless in +life he must be: even the eighteenth century +demanded that from candidates for English, if +not, according to Dean Swift, for Irish sees. +If he was also a man of courtly grace and +dignity, and a finished scholar, so much the +better. If he was a man of piety, that also was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_106' name='page_106'></a>106</span> +well. By the time of Queen Victoria the possession +of piety and of gifts of speech had become +more important qualifications, but the main thing +was tactful moderation. Even in apostolic days +it was required that a bishop should rule his own +house well, and the Popes esteemed most saintly +have not always been the best, as the famous case +of Celestine the Fifth attests. An archbishop +must first and foremost be a discreet and guarded +man, expressing few opinions, and those not extreme +ones. His chief virtue came to be, if not +the purely negative one of offending no section by +expressing the distinctive views of any other, yet +that of swerving so little from the <i>via media</i> between +Rome and Geneva that neither the Tractarian +party, who began to be feared after 1837, +nor the pronounced Low Churchmen could claim +the Primate as disposed to favour their opinions. +In the case of ordinary bishops the plan could +be adopted, and has since the days of Lord +Palmerston been mostly followed, of giving every +party its turn, while choosing from every party +men of the safer sort. This method, however, +was less applicable to the See of Canterbury, for +a man on whose action much might turn could +not well be taken from any particular section. +The acts and words of a Primate, who is expected +to “give a line” to the clergy generally and to +speak on behalf of the bench of bishops as a +whole, are so closely scrutinised that he must +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_107' name='page_107'></a>107</span> +be prudent and wary, yet not so wary as to seem +timid. He ought to be both firm and suave, +conciliatory and decided. That he may do +justice to all sections of the Church of England, +he ought not to be an avowed partisan +of any. Yet he must be able and eminent, and +of course able and eminent men are apt to throw +themselves into some one line of action or set +of views, and so come to be considered partisans. +The position which the Archbishop of Canterbury +holds as the representative in Parliament +of the whole Established Church, makes statesmanship +the most important of all qualifications. +Learning, energy, eloquence, piety would +none of them, nor all of them together, make +up for the want of calmness and wisdom. Yet +all those qualities are obviously desirable, because +they strengthen as well as adorn the primate’s +position.</p> +<p>Archibald Campbell Tait (born in Scotland in +1811, died 1882) was educated at Glasgow University +and at Balliol College, Oxford; worked at +his college for some years as a tutor, succeeded +Dr. Arnold as headmaster of Rugby School in +1843, became Dean of Carlisle and then Bishop +of London, and was translated to Canterbury +in 1868. It has been generally understood that +Mr. Disraeli, then Prime Minister, suggested +another prelate for the post, but the Queen, +who did not share her minister’s estimate of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_108' name='page_108'></a>108</span> +that prelate, expressed a preference for Tait. +Her choice was amply justified, for Tait united, +and indeed possessed in a high degree, the +qualifications which have just been enumerated. +He was, if it be not a paradox to say so, more +remarkable as an archbishop than as a man. He +had no original power as a thinker. He was +not a striking preacher, and the more pains he +took with his sermons the less interesting did they +become. He was so far from being learned that +you could say no more of him than that he was +a sound scholar and a well-informed man. He +was deeply and earnestly pious, but in a quiet, +almost dry way, which lacked what is called +unction, though it impressed those who were +in close contact with him. He showed slight +interest either in the historical or in the speculative +side of theology. Though a good headmaster, +he was not a stimulating teacher. Had +he remained all his life in a subordinate position, +as a college tutor at Oxford, or as canon of +some cathedral, he would have discharged the +duties of the position in a thoroughly satisfactory +way, and would have acquired influence +among his colleagues, but no one would have +felt that Fate had dealt unfairly with him in +depriving him of some larger career and loftier +post. No one, indeed, who knew him when he +was a college tutor seems to have predicted +the dignities he was destined to attain, although +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_109' name='page_109'></a>109</span> +he had shown in the theological strife that then +raged at Oxford the courage and independence +of his character.</p> +<p>In what, then, did the secret of his success +lie—the secret, that is, of his acquitting himself +so excellently in those dignities as to have +become almost a model to his own and the +next generation of what an Archbishop of Canterbury +ought to be? In the statesmanlike quality +of his mind. He had not merely moderation, +but what, though often confounded with moderation, +is something rarer and better, a steady +balance of mind. He was carried about by +no winds of doctrine. He seldom yielded to +impulses, and was never so seduced by any one +theory as to lose sight of other views and conditions +which had to be regarded. He was, I think, +the first man of Scottish birth who ever rose to +be Primate of England, and he had the cautious +self-restraint which is deemed characteristic of his +nation. He knew how to be dignified without +assumption, firm without vehemence, prudent +without timidity, judicious without coldness. +He was, above all things, a singularly just +man, who recognised every one’s rights, and +did not seek to overbear them by an exercise +of authority. He was as ready to listen to his +opponents as to his friends. Indeed, he so held +himself as to appear to have no opponents, but +to be rather a judge before whom different +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_110' name='page_110'></a>110</span> +advocates were stating their respective cases, +than a leader seeking to make his own views +or his own party prevail. Genial he could +hardly be called, for there was little warmth, +little display of emotion, in his manner; and the +clergy noted, at least in his earlier episcopal +days, a touch of the headmaster in his way of +receiving them. But he was simple and kindly, +capable of seeing the humorous side of things, +desiring to believe the good rather than the +evil, and to lead people instead of driving them. +With all his caution he was direct and straightforward, +saying no more than was necessary, +but saying nothing he had occasion to be ashamed +of. He sometimes made mistakes, but they were +not mistakes of the heart, and, being free from +vanity or self-conceit, he was willing in his quiet +way to admit them and to alter his course accordingly. +So his character by degrees gained upon +the nation, and so even ecclesiastical partisanship, +proverbially more bitter than political, +because it springs from deeper wells of feeling, +grew to respect and spare him. The influence +he obtained went far to strengthen the position +of the Established Church, and to keep its +several parties from breaking out into more open +hostility with one another. He himself inclined +to what might be called a moderate Broad +Church attitude, leaning more to Evangelical +than to Tractarian or Romanising views in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_111' name='page_111'></a>111</span> +matters of doctrine. At one time the extreme +High Churchmen regarded him as an enemy. +But this unfriendliness had almost died away +when the death of his wife and his only son +(a young man of singularly winning character), +followed by his own long illness, stilled the voices +of criticism.</p> +<p>He exerted great influence in the House +of Lords by his tact, by his firmness of +character, and by the consistency of his public +course, as well as by powers of speech, which, +matured by long practice, had risen to a +high level. Without eloquence, without either +imagination or passion, which are the chief +elements in eloquence, he had a grave, weighty, +thoughtful style which impressed that fastidious +audience. His voice was strong and sonorous, +his diction plain yet pure and dignified, his +matter well considered. His thought moved +on a high plane; he spoke as one who fully +believed every word he said. The late Bishop +of Winchester, the famous Dr. Samuel Wilberforce, +was incomparably his superior not only +as a talker but as an orator, but no less inferior +in his power over the House of Lords, for +so little does rhetorical brilliance count in a +critical and practical assembly. Next to courage, +the quality which gains trust and regard in a +deliberative body is that which is familiarly +described when it is said of a man, “You always +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_112' name='page_112'></a>112</span> +know where to find him.” Tait belonged to no +party. But his principles, though not rigid, were +fixed and settled; his words and votes were the +expression of his principles.</p> +<p>The presence of bishops in the House of +Lords is disapproved by some sections of English +opinion, and there are those among the temporal +peers who, quite apart from any political feeling, +are said to regard them with little favour. But +every one must admit that they have raised +and adorned the debates in that chamber. +Besides Tait and Wilberforce, two other prelates +of the same generation stood in the front +rank of speakers, Dr. Magee, whose wit and +fire would have found a more fitting theatre +in the House of Commons, and Dr. Thirlwall, +a scholar and historian whose massive intellect +and stately diction were too rarely used to raise +great political issues above the dust-storms of +party controversy.</p> +<p>Perhaps no Archbishop since the Revolution +of 1688 has exercised so much influence as Dr. +Tait, and certainly none within living memory +is so well entitled to be credited with a definite +ecclesiastical policy. His aim was to widen the +bounds of the Church of England, so far as the law +could, without evasion, be stretched for that purpose. +He bore a leading part in obtaining an Act of +Parliament which introduced a new and less strict +form of clerical subscription. He realised that the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_113' name='page_113'></a>113</span> +Church of England can maintain her position +as a State Church only by adapting herself to +the movements of opinion, and accordingly he +voted for the Divorce Bill of 1859, and for the +Burials Bill, which relieved Dissenters from a +grievance that exposed the Established Church +to odium. The Irish Church Disestablishment +Bill of 1869 threw upon him, at the critical +moment when it went from the House of +Commons, where it had passed by a large +majority, to the House of Lords, where a still +larger majority was hostile, a duty delicate in +itself, and such as seldom falls to the lot of a +prelate. The Queen wrote to him suggesting +that he should endeavour to effect a compromise +between Mr. Gladstone, then head of the +Liberal Ministry, and the leading Tory peers +who were opposing the Bill. He conducted the +negotiation with tact and judgment, and succeeded +in securing good pecuniary terms for the Protestant +Episcopal Establishment. Though he +had joined in the Letter of the Bishops which +conveyed their strong disapproval of the book +called <i>Essays and Reviews</i> (whose supposed +heretical tendencies roused such a storm in +1861), and had thereby displeased his friends, +Temple (afterwards archbishop), Jowett, and +Stanley,<a name='FNanchor_0017' id='FNanchor_0017'></a><a href='#Footnote_0017' class='fnanchor'>[20]</a> he joined in the judgment of the Privy +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_114' name='page_114'></a>114</span> +Council which in 1863 dismissed the charges +against the impugned Essayists. Despite his +advocacy of the Bill which in 1874 provided a +new procedure to be used against clergymen +transgressing the ritual prescribed by law, he +discouraged prosecutions, and did his utmost +to keep Ritualists as well as moderate Rationalists +within the pale of the Church of England. +He did not succeed—no one could have succeeded, +even though he had spoken with the +tongues of men and of angels—in stilling ecclesiastical +strife. The controversies of his days still +rage, though in a slightly different form. But +in refusing to yield to the pressure of any section, +in regarding the opinion of the laity rather than +that of the clergy, in keeping close to the law +yet giving it the widest possible interpretation, +he laid down the lines on which the Anglican +Established Church can best be defended and +upheld. That she will last, as an Establishment, +for any very long time, will hardly be +expected by those who mark the direction in +which thought tends to move all over the civilised +world. But Tait’s policy and personality +have counted for something in prolonging the +time-honoured connection of the Anglican Church +with the English State.</p> +<p>Perhaps a doubtful service either to the Church +or to the State. Yet even those who regret +the connection, and who, surveying the long +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_115' name='page_115'></a>115</span> +course of Christian history from the days of the +Emperor Constantine down to our own, believe +that the Christian Church would have been +spiritually purer and morally more effective had +she never become either the mistress or the +servant or the ally of the State, but relied on +her divine commission only, may wish that, when +the day arrives for the ancient bond to be unloosed, +it should be unloosed not through an embittered +political struggle, but because the general sentiment +of the nation, and primarily of religious +men throughout the nation, has come to approve +the change.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_116' name='page_116'></a>116</span> +<a name='ANTHONY_TROLLOPE21' id='ANTHONY_TROLLOPE21'></a> +<h2>ANTHONY TROLLOPE<a name="FNanchor_21" id="FNanchor_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor2">[21]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>When Mr. Anthony Trollope died (December +11, 1882) at the age of sixty-seven, he was the +best known of our English writers of fiction, +and stood foremost among them if the double +test of real merit and wide popularity be applied. +Some writers, such as Wilkie Collins, may have +commanded a larger sale. One writer at least, Mr. +George Meredith, had produced work of far deeper +insight and higher imaginative power. But the +gifts of Mr. Meredith had then scarcely begun +to win recognition, and not one reader knew his +name for five who knew Trollope’s. So Mr. +Thomas Hardy had published what many continue +to think his two best stories, but they had not +yet caught the eye of the general public. Mrs. +Oliphant, high as was the general level of her +work, and inexhaustible as her fertility appeared, +had not cut her name so deep upon the time +as Trollope did. Everything she did was good, +nothing superlatively good. No one placed +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_117' name='page_117'></a>117</span> +Trollope in the first rank of creative novelists +beside Dickens or Thackeray, or beside George +Eliot, who had died two years before. But in +the second rank he stood high; and though +other novelists may have had as many readers +as he, none was in so many ways representative +of the general character and spirit +of English fiction. He had established his +reputation nearly thirty years before, when +Thackeray and Dickens were still in the fulness +of their fame; and had maintained it during +the zenith of George Eliot’s. For more than +a generation his readers had come from the +best-educated classes as well as from those who +lack patience or taste for anything heavier +than a story of adventure. In this respect +he stood above Miss Braddon, Mrs. Henry +Wood, Ouida, and other heroines of the circulating +libraries, and also above such more +artistic or less sensational writers as William +Black, Walter Besant, James Payn, and Whyte +Melville. (The school of so-called realistic +fiction had scarcely begun to appear.) None +of these had, like Trollope, succeeded in making +their creations a part of the common thought of +cultivated Englishmen; none had, like him, given +us characters which we treat as typical men and +women, and discuss at a dinner-table as though +they were real people. Mrs. Proudie, for instance, +the Bishop of Barchester’s wife, to take the most +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_118' name='page_118'></a>118</span> +obvious instance (though not that most favourable +to Trollope, for he produced better portraits than +hers), or Archdeacon Grantly, was when Trollope +died as familiar a name to English men and +women between sixty and thirty years of age +as Wilkins Micawber, or Blanche Amory, or +Rosamond Lydgate. There was no other living +novelist of whose personages the same could be +said, and perhaps none since has attained this +particular kind of success.</p> +<p>Personally, Anthony Trollope was a bluff, +genial, hearty, vigorous man, typically English +in his face, his talk, his ideas, his tastes. His +large eyes, which looked larger behind his large +spectacles, were full of good-humoured life and +force; and though he was neither witty nor +brilliant in conversation, he was what is called +very good company, having travelled widely, +known all sorts of people, and formed views, +usually positive views, on all the subjects of +the day, views which he was prompt to declare +and maintain. There was not much novelty in +them—you were disappointed not to find so +clever a writer more original—but they were +worth listening to for their solid common-sense, +tending rather to commonplace sense, and you +enjoyed the ardour with which he threw himself +into a discussion. Though boisterous and +insistent in his talk, he was free from assumption +or conceit, and gave the impression of liking the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_119' name='page_119'></a>119</span> +world he lived in, and being satisfied with his +own place in it. Neither did one observe in him +that erratic turn which is commonly attributed to +literary men. He was a steady and regular worker, +who rose every morning between five and six to +turn out a certain quantity of copy for the printer +before breakfast, enjoying his work, and fond of +his own characters—indeed he declared that he +filled his mind with them and saw them moving +before him—yet composing a novel just as other +people might compose tables of statistics. These +methodical habits were to some extent due to his +training as a clerk in the Post Office, where he +spent the earlier half of his working life, having +retired in 1864. He did not neglect his duties +there, even when occupied in writing, and claimed +to have been the inventor of the pillar letter-box. +It was probably in his tours as an inspector of +postal deliveries that he obtained that knowledge +of rural life which gives reality to his pictures +of country society. He turned his Civil Service +experiences to account in some of his stories, +giving faithful and characteristic sketches, in +<i>The Three Clerks</i> and <i>The Small House at +Allington</i>, of different types of Government +officials, a class which is much more of a class in +England than it is in America, though less of +a class than it is in Germany or France. His +favourite amusement was hunting, as readers of +his novels know, and until his latest years he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_120' name='page_120'></a>120</span> +might have been seen, though a heavy weight, +following the hounds in Essex once or twice a +week.</p> +<p>When E. A. Freeman wrote a magazine +article denouncing the cruelty of field sports, +Trollope replied, defending the amusement he +loved. Some one said it was a collision of two +rough diamonds. But the end was that Freeman +invited Trollope to come and stay with him at +Wells, and they became great friends.</p> +<p>Like most of his literary contemporaries, he +was a politician, and indeed a pretty keen one. +He once contested in the Liberal interest—in +those days literary men were mostly Liberals—the +borough of Beverley in Yorkshire, a corrupt little +place, where bribery proved too strong for him. +It was thereafter disfranchised as a punishment +for its misdeeds; and his costly experiences doubtless +suggested the clever electioneering sketches +in the story of <i>Ralph the Heir</i>. Thackeray also +was once a Liberal candidate. He stood for the +city of Oxford, and the story was current there for +years afterwards how the freemen of the borough +(not an exemplary class of voters) rose to an unwonted +height of virtue by declaring that though +they did not understand his speeches or know +who he was, they would vote for him, expecting +nothing, because he was a friend of Mr. Neate’s. +Trollope showed his continued interest in public +affairs by appearing on the platform at the great +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_121' name='page_121'></a>121</span> +meeting in St. James’s Hall in December 1876, +which was the beginning of a vehement party +struggle over the Eastern Question that only +ended at the general election of 1880. He was +a direct and forcible speaker, who would have +made his way had he entered Parliament. But +as he had no practical experience of politics +either in the House of Commons or as a working +member of a party organisation in a city where +contests are keen, the pictures of political life +which are so frequent in his later tales have +not much flavour of reality. They are sketches +obviously taken from the outside. Very rarely +do even the best writers of fiction succeed in reproducing +any special and peculiar kind of life and +atmosphere. Of the various stories that purport +to describe what goes on in the English Parliament, +none gives to those who know the social +conditions and habits of the place an impression +of truth to nature, and the same has often been +remarked with regard to tales of English University +life. Trollope, however, with his quick +eye for the superficial aspects of any society, +might have described the House of Commons +admirably had he sat in it himself. He was +fond of travel, and between 1862 and 1880 +visited the United States, the West Indies, +Australia and New Zealand, and South Africa, +about all of which he wrote books which, if +hardly of permanent value, were fresh, vigorous, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_122' name='page_122'></a>122</span> +and eminently readable, conveying a definite and +generally correct impression of the more obvious +social and economic phenomena he found then +existing. His account of the United States, +for instance, is excellent, and did something to +make the Americans forgive the asperity with +which his mother had described her experiences +there many years before. Trollope’s travel +sketches are as much superior in truthfulness to +Froude’s descriptions of the same regions as +they are inferior in the allurements of style.</p> +<p>The old classification of novels, based on the +two most necessary elements of a drama, divided +them into novels of plot and novels of character. +To these we have of late years added novels of +incident or adventure, novels of conversation, +novels of manners, not to speak of “novels +with a purpose,” which are sermons or pamphlets +in disguise. No one doubted to which of these +categories Trollope’s work should be referred. +There was in his stories as little plot as a story +can well have. The conversations never beamed +with humour like that of Scott, nor glittered +with aphorisms like those of George Meredith. +The incidents carried the reader pleasantly along, +but seldom surprised him by any ingenuity of +contrivance. Character there was, and, indeed, +great fertility in the creation of character, for +there is hardly one of the tales in which three +or four at least of the personages do not stand +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_123' name='page_123'></a>123</span> +out as people whom you would know again if +you met them years after. But the conspicuous +merit of Trollope’s novels, in the eyes of his +own countrymen, is their value as pictures of +contemporary manners. Here he may claim +to have been surpassed by no writer of his +own generation. Dickens, with all his great +and splendid gifts, did not describe the society +he lived in. His personages were too unusual +and peculiar to speak and act and think +like the ordinary men and women of the nineteenth +century; nor would a foreigner, however +much he might enjoy the exuberant humour and +dramatic power with which they are presented, +learn from them much about the ways and habits +of the average Englishman. The everyday life +to which the stories are most true is the life +of the lower middle class in London; and some +one has observed that although this class changes +less quickly than the classes above it, it is already +unlike that which Dickens saw when in the +’thirties he was a police-court reporter. Critics +have, indeed, said that Dickens was too great +a painter to be a good photographer, but the +two arts are not incompatible, as appears from +the skill with which Walter Scott, for instance, +portrayed the peasantry of his own country in +<i>The Antiquary</i>. Thackeray, again, though he +has described certain sections of the upper or +upper middle class with far more power and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_124' name='page_124'></a>124</span> +delicacy than Trollope ever reached, does not +go beyond those sections, and has little to tell +us about the middle class generally, still less +about the classes beneath them. Trollope +was thoroughly at home in the English middle +class and also (though less perfectly) in the +upper class; and his pictures are all the more +true to life because there is not that vein of +stern or cynical reflection which runs through +Thackeray, and makes us think less of the +story than of the moral. Trollope usually has +a moral, but it is so obvious, so plainly and +quietly put, that it does not distract attention +from the minor incidents and little touches of +every day which render the sketches lifelike. If +even his best-drawn characters are not far removed +from the commonplace this helps to make them +fairly represent the current habits and notions of +their time. They are the same people we meet +in the street or at a dinner-party; and they are +mostly seen under no more exciting conditions than +those of a hunting meet, or a lawn-tennis match, +or an afternoon tea. They are flirting or talking +for effect, or scheming for some petty temporary +end; they are not under the influence of strong +passions, or forced into striking situations, like +the leading characters in Charlotte Brontë’s or +George Eliot’s novels; and for this reason again +they represent faithfully the ordinary surface of +English upper and upper middle class society: +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_125' name='page_125'></a>125</span> +its prejudices, its little pharisaisms and hypocrisies, +its snobbishness, its worship of conventionalities, +its aloofness from or condescension to those +whom it deems below its own level; and therewith +also its public spirit, its self-helpfulness, +its neighbourliness, its respect for honesty and +straightforwardness, its easy friendliness of manner +towards all who stand within the sacred pale +of social recognition. Nor, again, has any one +more skilfully noted and set down those transient +tastes and fashions which are, so to speak, the +trimmings of the dress, and which, transient +though they are, and quickly forgotten by contemporaries, +will have an interest for one who, +a century or two hence, feels the same curiosity +about our manners as we feel about those of +the subjects of King George the Third. That +Trollope will be read at all fifty years after +his death one may hesitate to predict, considering +how comparatively few in the present +generation read Richardson, or Fielding, or Miss +Edgeworth, or Charlotte Brontë, and how much +reduced is the number of those who read even +Walter Scott and Thackeray. But whoever +does read Trollope in 1930 will gather from his +pages better than from any others an impression +of what everyday life was like in England in the +“middle Victorian” period. The aspects of that +life were already, when his latest books were +written, beginning to change, and the features he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_126' name='page_126'></a>126</span> +drew are fast receding into history. Even the +clergy of 1852-1862 are no longer, except in +quiet country districts, the same as the clergy +we now see.</p> +<p>People have often compared the personal impressions +which eminent writers make on those +who talk to them with the impressions previously +derived from their works. Thomas Carlyle and +Robert Browning used to be taken as two +instances representing opposite extremes. Carlyle +always talked in character: had there been phonographs +in his days, the phonographed “record” +might have been printed as part of one of his +books. Browning, on the other hand, seemed +unlike what his poems had made a reader +expect: it was only after a long <i>tête-à-tête</i> with +him that the poet whose mind had been learned +through his works stood revealed. Trollope at +first caused a similar though less marked surprise. +This bluff burly man did not seem the kind of +person who would trace with a delicate touch +the sunlight sparkling on, or a gust of temper +ruffling, the surface of a youthful soul in love. +Upon further knowledge one perceived that +the features of Trollope’s talent, facile invention, +quick observation, and a strong common-sense +view of things, with little originality or +intensity, were really the dominant features of his +character as expressed in talk. Still, though the +man was more of a piece with his books than he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_127' name='page_127'></a>127</span> +had seemed, one could never quite recognise in +him the delineator of Lily Dale.</p> +<p>As a painter of manners he recalls two of his +predecessors—one greater, one less great than +himself. In his limitations and in his fidelity +to the aspects of daily life as he saw them, he +resembles Miss Austen. He is inferior to her +in delicacy of portraiture, in finish, in atmosphere. +No two of his books can be placed on a level +with <i>Emma</i> and <i>Persuasion</i>. On the other hand, +while he has done for the years 1850-1870 what +Miss Burney did for 1770-1790, most critics will +place him above her both in fertility and in +naturalness. Her characters are apt either to +want colour, like the heroines of <i>Evelina</i> and +<i>Cecilia</i>, or to be so exaggerated, like Mr. Briggs +and Miss Larolles, as to approach the grotesque. +Trollope is a realist in the sense of being, in all +but a few of his books, on the lines of normal +humanity, though he is seldom strong enough to +succeed, when he pierces down to the bed-rock of +human nature, in rendering the primal passions +either solemn or terrible. Like Miss Austen, he +attains actuality by observation rather than by +imagination, hardly ever entering the sphere of +poetry.</p> +<p>His range was not wide, for he could not +present either grand characters or tragical situations, +any more than he could break out into +the splendid humour of Dickens. His wings +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_128' name='page_128'></a>128</span> +never raised him far above the level floor of +earth. But within that limited range he had +surprising fertility. His clerical portrait-gallery +is the most complete that any English novelist +has given us. No two faces are exactly alike, +and yet all are such people as one might see +any day in the pulpit. So, again, there is +scarcely one of his stories in which a young +lady is not engaged, formally or practically, to +two men at the same time, or one man more +or less committed to two women; yet no story +repeats exactly the situation, or raises the +problem of honour and duty in quite the same +form as it appears in the stories that went +before. Few people who have written so much +have so little appeared to be exhausting their +invention.</p> +<p>It must, however, be admitted that Trollope’s +fame might have stood higher if he had written +less. The public which had been delighted with +his earlier groups of novels, and especially +with that group in which <i>The Warden</i> comes +first and <i>Barchester Towers</i> second, began +latterly to tire of what they had come to deem +the mannerisms of their favourite, and felt that +they now knew the compass of his gifts. +Partly, perhaps, because he feared to be always +too like himself, he once or twice attempted +to represent more improbable situations and exceptional +personages. But the attempt was not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_129' name='page_129'></a>129</span> +successful. He lost his touch of ordinary life +without getting into any higher region of poetical +truth; and in his latest stories he had begun to +return to his earlier and better manner.</p> +<p>New tendencies, moreover, embodying themselves +in new schools, were already beginning to +appear. R. L. Stevenson as leader of the school +of adventure, Mr. Henry James as the apostle of +the school of psychological analysis, soon to be +followed by Mr. Kipling with a type of imaginative +directness distinctively his own, were beginning to +lead minds and tastes into other directions. The +influence of France was more felt than it had +been when Trollope began to write. And what a +contrast between Trollope’s manner and that of +his chief French contemporaries, such as Octave +Feuillet or Alphonse Daudet or Guy de Maupassant! +The French novelists, be their faculty of +invention greater or less, at any rate studied their +characters with more care than English writers +had usually shown. The characters were fewer, +almost as few as in a classical drama; and +the whole action of the story is carefully subordinated +to the development of these characters, +and the placing of them in a critical +position which sets their strength and weakness +in the fullest light. There was more of a +judicious adaptation of the parts to the whole +in French fiction than in ours, and therefore more +unity of impression was attained. Trollope, no +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_130' name='page_130'></a>130</span> +doubt, set a bad example in this respect. He +crowded his canvas with figures; he pursued the +fortunes of three or four sets of people at the same +time, caring little how the fate of the one set +affected that of the others; he made his novel a +sort of chronicle which you might open anywhere +and close anywhere, instead of a drama animated +by one idea and converging towards one centre. +He neglected the art which uses incidents small +in themselves to lead up to the <i>dénoûment</i> and make +it more striking. He took little pains with his +diction, seeming not to care how he said what he +had to say. These defects strike those who turn +over his pages to-day. But to those who read +him in the ’fifties or ’sixties, the carelessness was +redeemed by, or forgotten in, the vivacity with +which the story moved, the freshness and faithfulness +of its pictures of character and manners.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_131' name='page_131'></a>131</span> +<a name='JOHN_RICHARD_GREEN22' id='JOHN_RICHARD_GREEN22'></a> +<h2>JOHN RICHARD GREEN<a name="FNanchor_22" id="FNanchor_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor2">[22]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>John Richard Green was born in Oxford +on 12th December 1837, and educated first +at Magdalen College School, and afterwards, +for a short time, at a private tutor’s. He +was a singularly quick and bright boy, and at +sixteen obtained by competition a scholarship +at Jesus College, Oxford, where he began to +reside in 1856. The members of that college +were in those days almost entirely Welshmen, and +thereby somewhat cut off from the rest of the +University. They saw little of men in other +colleges, so that a man might have a reputation +for ability in his own society without +gaining any in the larger world of Oxford. It +so happened with Green. Though his few +intimate friends perceived his powers, they had +so little intercourse with the rest of the University, +either by way of breakfasts and wine-parties, +or at the University debating society, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_132' name='page_132'></a>132</span> +or in athletic sports, that he remained unknown +even to those among his contemporaries who +were interested in the same things, and would +have most enjoyed his acquaintance. The only +eminent person who seems to have appreciated +and influenced him was Dean Stanley, then +Professor of Ecclesiastical History and Canon of +Christ Church. Green had attended Stanley’s +lectures, and Stanley, whose kindly interest in +young men never failed, was struck by him, and +had some share in turning his studies towards +history. He graduated in 1860, having refused +to compete for honours, because he had not +received from those who were then tutors of the +college the recognition to which he was entitled.</p> +<p>In 1860 he was ordained, and became curate +in London at St. Barnabas, King’s Square, +whence, after two years’ experience, and one or +two temporary engagements, including the sole +charge of a parish in Hoxton, he was appointed +in 1865 to the incumbency of St. Philip’s, Stepney, +a district church in one of the poorest parts of +London, where the vicar’s income was ill-proportioned +to the claims which needy parishioners +made upon him. Here he worked with zeal +and assiduity for about three years, gaining an +insight into the condition and needs of the poor +which scholars and historians seldom obtain. +He learnt, in fact, to know men, and the real +forces that sway them; and he used to say in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_133' name='page_133'></a>133</span> +later life that he was conscious how much this +had helped him in historical writing. Gibbon, +as every one knows, makes a similar remark +about his experience as a captain in the Hampshire +militia.</p> +<p>Green threw the whole force of his nature +into the parish schools, spending some part of +every day in them; he visited incessantly, and +took an active part in the movement for regulating +and controlling private charity which led +to the formation of the Charity Organisation +Society. An outbreak of cholera and period +of distress among the poor which occurred +during his incumbency drew warm-hearted men +from other parts of London to give their +help to the clergy of the East End. Edward +Denison, who was long affectionately remembered +by many who knew him in Oxford and +London, chose Green’s parish to work in, and +the two friends confirmed one another in their +crusade against indiscriminate and demoralising +charity. It was at this time that Green, who +spent upon the parish nearly all that he received +as vicar, found himself obliged to earn some +money by other means, and began to write +for the <i>Saturday Review</i>. The addition of +this labour to the daily fatigues of his parish +duties told on his health, which had always +been delicate, and made him willingly accept +from Archbishop Tait, who had early marked +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_134' name='page_134'></a>134</span> +and learned to value his abilities, the post of +librarian at Lambeth. He quitted Stepney, and +never took any other clerical work.</p> +<p>Although physical weakness was one of the +causes which compelled this step, there was also +another. He had been brought up in Tractarian +views, and is said to have been at one time on +the point of entering the Church of Rome. This +tendency passed off, and before he went to St. +Philip’s he had become a Broad Churchman, and +was much influenced by the writings of Mr. F. +D. Maurice, whom he knew and used frequently +to meet, and whose pure and noble character, +even more perhaps than his preaching, had +profoundly impressed him. However, his restless +mind did not stop long at that point. The same +tendency which had carried him away from +Tractarianism made him feel less and less at +home in the ministry of the Church of England, +and would doubtless have led him, even had his +health been stronger, to withdraw from clerical +duties. After a few years his friends ceased to +address letters to him under the usual clerical +epithet; but he continued to interest himself in +ecclesiastical affairs, and always retained a marked +dislike to Nonconformity. Aversions sometimes +outlive attachments.</p> +<p>On leaving Stepney he went to live in lodgings +in Beaumont Street, Marylebone, and divided +his time between Lambeth and literary work. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_135' name='page_135'></a>135</span> +He now during several years wrote a good deal +for the <i>Saturday Review</i>, and his articles were +among the best which then appeared in that +organ. The most valuable of them were reviews +of historical books, and descriptions from +the historical point of view of cities or other remarkable +places, especially English and French +towns. Some of these are masterpieces. Other +articles were on social, or what may be called +occasional, topics, and attracted much notice at +the time from their gaiety and lightness of touch, +which sometimes seemed to pass into flippancy. +He never wrote upon politics, nor was he in the +ordinary sense of the word a journalist, for with +the exception of these social articles, his work +was all done in his own historical field, and done +with as much care and pains as others would +bestow on the composition of a book. Upon +this subject I may quote the words of one of his +oldest and most intimate friends (Mr. Stopford +Brooke), who knew all he did in those days.</p> +<blockquote> +<p>The real history of this writing for the <i>Saturday Review</i> +has much personal, pathetic, and literary interest.</p> +<p>It was when he was vicar of St. Philip’s, Stepney, that he +wrote the most. The income of the place was, I think, +£300 a year, and the poverty of the parish was very great. +Mr. Green spent every penny of this income on the parish. +And he wrote—in order to live, and often when he was +wearied out with the work of the day and late into the night—two, +and often three, articles a week for the <i>Saturday +Review</i>. It was less of a strain to him than it would have +been to many others, because he wrote with such speed, and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_136' name='page_136'></a>136</span> +because his capacity for rapidly throwing his subject into +form and his memory were so remarkable. But it was a +severe strain, nevertheless, for one who, at the time, had in +him the beginnings of the disease of which he died.</p> +<p>I was staying with him once for two days, and the first +night he said to me, “I have three articles to write for the +<i>Saturday Review</i>, and they must all be done in thirty-six +hours.” “What are they?” I said; “and how have you found +time to think of them?” “Well,” he answered, “one is on +a volume of Freeman’s <i>Norman Conquest</i>, another is a ‘light +middle,’ and the last on the history of a small town in +England; and I have worked them all into form as I was +walking to-day about the parish and in London.” One of +these studies was finished before two o’clock in the morning, +and while I talked to him; the other two were done the next +day. It is not uncommon to reach such speed, but it is very +uncommon to combine this speed with literary excellence of +composition, and with permanent and careful knowledge. +The historical reviews were of use to, and gratefully acknowledged +by, his brother historians, and frequently extended, in +two or three numbers of the <i>Saturday Review</i>, to the length +of an article in a magazine. I used to think them masterpieces +of reviewing, and their one fault was the fault which +was then frequent in that <i>Review</i>—over-vehemence in +slaughtering its foes. Such reviewing cannot be fairly +described as journalism. It was an historical scholar speaking +to scholars.</p> +<p>Another class of articles written by Mr. Green were articles +on towns in England, France, or Italy. I do not know +whether it was he or Mr. Freeman who introduced this +custom of bringing into a short space the historical aspect of +a single town or of a famous building, and showing how the +town or the building recorded its own history, and how it +was linked to general history, but Mr. Green, at least, began +it very early in his articles on Oxford. At any rate, it was +his habit, at this time, whenever he travelled in England, +France, or Italy, to make a study of any town he visited.</p> +<p>Articles of this kind—and he had them by fifties in his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_137' name='page_137'></a>137</span> +head—formed the second line of what has been called his +journalism. I should prefer to call them contributions to +history. They are totally different in quality from ordinary +journalism. They are short historical essays.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>As his duties at Lambeth made no great +demands on his time, he was now able to devote +himself more steadily to historical work. His +first impulse in that direction seems, as I have +said, to have been received from Dean Stanley +at Oxford. His next came from E. A. Freeman, +who had been impressed by an ingenious +paper of his at a meeting of the Somerset +Archæological Society, and who became from that +time his steadfast friend. Green was a born +historian, who would have been eminent without +any help except that of books. But he was wise +enough to know the value of personal counsel +and direction, and generous enough to be heartily +grateful for what he received. He did not belong +in any special sense to what has been called +Freeman’s school, differing widely from that distinguished +writer in many of his views, and still +more in style and manner. But he learnt much +from Freeman, and he delighted to acknowledge +his debt. He learnt among other things the value +of accuracy, the way to handle original authorities, +the interpretation of architecture, and he received, +during many years of intimate intercourse, the +constant sympathy and encouragement of a friend +whose affection was never blind to faults, while +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_138' name='page_138'></a>138</span> +his admiration was never clouded by jealousy. +It was his good fortune to win the regard and +receive the advice of another illustrious historian, +Dr. Stubbs, who has expressed in language +perhaps more measured, but not less emphatic +than Freeman’s, his sense of Green’s services +to English history. These two he used to call +his masters; but no one who has read him and +them needs to be told that his was one of those +strong and rich intelligences which, in becoming +more perfect by the study of others, loses nothing +of its originality.</p> +<p>His first continuous studies had lain among the +Angevin kings of England, and the note-books still +exist in which he had accumulated materials for +their history. However, the book he planned +was never written, for when the state of his lungs +(which forced him to spend the winter of 1870-71 +at San Remo) had begun to alarm his friends, +they urged him to throw himself at once into +some treatise likely to touch the world more than +a minute account of so remote a period could +do. Accordingly he began, and in two or three +years, his winters abroad sadly interrupting work, +he completed the <i>Short History of the English +People</i>. When a good deal of it had gone +through the press, he felt, and his friends agreed +with him, that the style of the earlier chapters +was too much in the eager, quick, sketchy, +“point-making” manner of his <i>Saturday Review</i> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_139' name='page_139'></a>139</span> +articles, “and did not possess” (says the friend +whom I have already quoted) “enough historical +dignity for a work which was to take in the whole +history of England. It was then, being convinced +of this, that he cancelled a great deal of what +had been stereotyped, and re-wrote it, re-creating, +with his passionate facility, his whole style.” In +order to finish it he gave up the <i>Saturday +Review</i> altogether, though he could ill spare what +his writing there brought him in. It is seldom +that one finds such swiftness and ease in composition +as his, united to so much fastidiousness. +He went on remoulding and revising till his +friends insisted that the book should be published +anyhow, and published it accordingly was, in +1874. Feeling that his time on earth might be +short, for he was often disabled even by a catarrh, +he was the readier to yield.</p> +<p>The success of the <i>Short History</i> was rapid +and overwhelming. Everybody bought it. It was +philosophical enough for scholars, and popular +enough for schoolboys. No historical book since +Macaulay’s <i>History</i> has made its way so fast, or +been read with so much avidity. And Green was +under disadvantages from which his great predecessor +did not suffer. Macaulay’s name was +famous before his <i>History of England</i> appeared, +and Macaulay’s scale was so large that he could +enliven his pages with a multitude of anecdotes +and personal details. Green was known only to a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_140' name='page_140'></a>140</span> +small circle of friends, having written nothing under +his own signature except one or two papers in +magazines or in the Transactions of archæological +societies; and the plan of his book, which dealt, in +eight hundred and twenty pages, with the whole +fourteen centuries of English national life, obliged +him to handle facts in the mass, and touch +lightly and briefly on personal traits. A summary +is of all kinds of writing that which it is hardest +to make interesting, because one must speak +in general terms, one must pack facts tightly +together, one must be content to give those facts +without the delicacies of light and shade, or the +subtler tints of colour. Yet such was his skill, +both literary and historical, that his outlines gave +more pleasure and instruction than other people’s +finished pictures.</p> +<p>In 1876 he took, for the only time in his life, +except when he had supported a working-man’s +candidate for the Tower Hamlets at the general +election of 1868, an active part in practical +politics. Towards the end of that year, when +war seemed impending between Russia and +the Turks, fears were entertained that England +might undertake the defence of the Sultan, and +a body called the Eastern Question Association +was formed to organise opposition to the pro-Turkish +policy of Lord Beaconsfield’s Ministry. +Green threw himself warmly into the movement, +was chosen to serve on the Executive Committee +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_141' name='page_141'></a>141</span> +of the Association, and was one of a sub-committee +of five (which included also Mr. Stopford Brooke +and Mr. William Morris the poet<a name='FNanchor_0018' id='FNanchor_0018'></a><a href='#Footnote_0018' class='fnanchor'>[23]</a>) appointed to +draw up the manifesto convoking the meeting of +delegates from all parts of the country, which was +held in December 1876, under the title of the +Eastern Question Conference. The sub-committee +met at my house and spent the whole +day on its work. It was a new and curious +experience to see these three great men of +letters drafting a political appeal. Morris and +Green were both of them passionately anti-Turkish, +and Morris indeed acted for the next +two years as treasurer of the Association, doing +his work with a business-like efficiency such as +poets seldom possess. Green continued to attend +the general committee until, after the Treaty of +Berlin, it ceased to meet, and took the keenest +interest in its proceedings. But his weak health +and frequent winter absences made public appearances +impossible to him. He was all his +life an ardent Liberal. His sympathy with +national movements did not confine itself to +Continental Europe, but embraced Ireland and +made him a Home Ruler long before Mr. +Gladstone and the Liberal party adopted that +policy. It ought to be added that though he +had ceased to belong to the Church of England, +he remained strongly opposed to disestablishment.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_142' name='page_142'></a>142</span></div> +<p>When he had completed the re-casting of his +<i>Short History</i> in the form of a larger book, which +appeared under the title of <i>A History of the +English People</i>, he addressed himself with characteristic +activity to a new project. He had for a +long time meditated upon the <i>origines</i> of English +history, the settlement of the Teutonic invaders +in Britain, followed by the consolidation of their +tribes into a nation with definite institutions and a +settled order; and his desire to treat this topic +was stimulated by the way in which some critics +had sought to disparage his <i>Short History</i> +as a mere popularising of other people’s ideas. +The criticism was unjust, for, if there had been +no rummaging in MS. sources for the <i>Short +History</i>, there was abundant originality in the +views the book contained. However, these +carpings disposed his friends to recommend an enterprise +which would lead him to deal chiefly with +original authorities, and to put forth those powers +of criticism and construction which they knew him +to possess. Thus he set to work afresh at the +very beginning, at Roman Britain and the Saxon +Conquest. He had not advanced far when, having +gone to spend the winter in Egypt, he caught an +illness which so told on his weak frame that he was +only just able to return to London in April, and +would not have reached it at all but for the care +with which he was tended by his wife. (He had +married Miss Alice Stopford in 1877.) In a few +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_143' name='page_143'></a>143</span> +weeks he so far recovered as to be able to resume +his studies, though now forbidden to give to them +more than two or three hours a day. However, +what he could not do alone he did with and through +his wife, who consulted the original sources for +him, investigated obscure points, and wrote at +his dictation. In this way, during the summer +and autumn months of 1881, when often some +slight change of weather would throw him back +and make work impossible for days or weeks, +the book was prepared, which he published in +February 1882, under the title of <i>The Making of +England</i>. Even in those few months it was incessantly +rewritten; no less than ten copies were +made of the first chapter. It was warmly received +by the few persons who were capable of judging +its merits. But he was himself far from satisfied +with it as a literary performance, thinking that a +reader would find it at once too speculative and +too dry, deficient in the details needed to make +the life of primitive England real and instructive. +If this had been so it would have been due to no +failing in his skill, but to the scantiness of the +materials available for the first few centuries of +our national history. But he felt it so strongly +that he was often disposed to recur to his idea of +writing a history of the last seventy or eighty +years, and was only induced by the encouragement +of a few friends to pursue the narrative +which, in <i>The Making of England</i>, he had carried +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_144' name='page_144'></a>144</span> +down to the reign of Egbert. The winter of 1881 +was spent at Mentone, and the following summer +in London. He continued very weak, and was +sometimes unable for weeks together to go out +driving or to work at home. But the moment +that an access of strength returned, the note-books +were brought out, and he was again busy +going through what his wife’s industry had +tabulated, and dictating for an hour or two till +fatigue forced him to desist. Those who saw +him during that summer were amazed, not only +at the brave spirit which refused to yield to +physical feebleness, but at the brightness and +clearness of his intellect, which was not only +as active as it had ever been before, but as +much interested in whatever passed in the world. +When one saw him sitting propped up with +cushions on the sofa, his tiny frame worn to +skin and bone, his voice interrupted by frequent +fits of coughing, it seemed wrong to stay, but, +after a little, all was forgotten in the fascination +of his talk, and one found it hard to +realise that where thought was strong speech +might be weak.</p> +<p>In October, when he returned to Mentone, +the tale of early English history had been completed, +and was in type down to the death of +Earl Godwine in <span class='smcaplc'>A.D.</span> 1052. He had hesitated +as to the point at which the book should end, +but finally decided to carry it down to <span class='smcaplc'>A.D.</span> 1085, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_145' name='page_145'></a>145</span> +the date of the dispersion of the last great Scandinavian +armament which threatened England. As +the book dealt with both the Danish and Norman +invasions, he called it <i>The Conquest of England</i>. +It appeared after his death, wanting, indeed, +those expansions in several places which he had +meant to give it, but still a book such as few but he +could have produced, full of new light, and equal +in the parts which have been fully handled to the +best work of his earlier years.</p> +<p>Soon after he returned to Mentone he became +rapidly worse, and unfit for any continuous exertion. +He could barely sit in the garden during +an hour or two of morning sunshine. There +I saw him in the end of December, fresh and +keen as ever, aware that the most he could +hope for was to live long enough to complete +his <i>Conquest</i>, but eagerly reading every new +book that came to him from England, starting +schemes for various historical treatises sufficient +to fill three life-times, and ranging in talk over +the whole field of politics, literature, and history. +It seemed as if the intellect and will, which strove +to remain till their work was done, were the only +things which held the weak and wasted body +together. The ardour of his spirit prolonged +life amid the signs of death. In January there +came a new attack, and in February another +unexpected rally. On the 2nd of March he +remarked that it was no use fighting longer, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_146' name='page_146'></a>146</span> +and expired five days afterwards at the age of +forty-six.</p> +<p>Short as his life was, maimed and saddened +by an ill-health which gave his powers no fair +chance, it was not an unhappy life, for he had +that immense power of enjoyment which so often +belongs to a vivacious intelligence. He delighted +in books, in travel, in his friends’ company, in the +constant changes and movements of the world. +No satiety dulled his taste for these things, nor was +his spirit, except for passing moments, darkened +by the shadows which to others seemed to lie +so thick around his path. He enjoyed, though +without boasting, the fame his books had won, +and the sense of creative power. And the last +six years of his life were brightened by the +society and affection of one who entered into +all his tastes and pursuits with the fullest +sympathy, and enabled him, by her unwearied +diligence, to prosecute labours which physical +weakness must otherwise have arrested.</p> +<p>He might have won fame as a preacher or as +a political journalist. It was, however, towards +historical study that the whole current of his +intellect set, and as it is by what he did in that +sphere that he will be remembered, his special +gifts for it deserve to be examined.</p> +<p>A historian needs four kinds of capacity. +First of all, accuracy, and a desire for the exact +truth, which will grudge no time and pains in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_147' name='page_147'></a>147</span> +tracing out even what might seem a trivial +matter. Secondly, keen observation, which can +fasten upon small points, and discover in isolated +data the basis for some generalisation, or the +illustration of some principle. Thirdly, a sound +and calm judgment, which will subject all +inferences and generalisations, both one’s own +and other people’s, to a searching review, +and weigh in delicate scales their validity. +These two last-mentioned qualifications taken +together make up what we call the critical +faculty, <i>i.e.</i> the power of dealing with evidence +as tending to establish or discredit statements +of fact, and those general conclusions which +are built on the grouping of facts. Neither +acuteness alone nor the judicial balance alone is +enough to make the critic. There are men quick +in observation and fertile in suggestion whose +conclusions are worthless, because they cannot +weigh one argument against another, just as +there are solid and well-balanced minds that +never enlighten a subject because, while detecting +the errors of others, they cannot combine the +data and propound a luminous explanation. To +the making of a true critic, in history, in philosophy, +in literature, in psychology, even largely +in the sciences of nature, there should go not only +judgment, but also a certain measure of creative +power. Fourthly, the historian must have imagination, +not indeed with that intensity which +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_148' name='page_148'></a>148</span> +makes the poet, but in sufficient volume to let him +feel the men of other ages and countries to be +living and real like those among whom he moves, +to present to him a large and full picture of a +world remote from himself in time—as a world +moving, struggling, hoping, fearing, enjoying, believing, +like the near world of to-day—a world in +which there went on a private life of thousands or +millions of men and women, vaster, more complex, +more interesting than that public life which is +sometimes all that the records of the past have +transmitted to us. Our imaginative historian +may or may not be able to reconstruct for us the +private and personal as well as the public or +political life of the past. If he can, he will. If +the data are too scanty, he may cautiously forbear. +Yet he will still feel that those whose +movements on the public stage he chronicles +were steeped in an environment of natural +and human influences which must have affected +them at every turn; and he will so describe +them as to make us feel them human, and give +life to the pallid figures of far-off warriors and +lawgivers.</p> +<p>To these four aptitudes one need hardly add +the faculty of literary exposition, for whoever +possesses in large measure the last three, or +even the last alone, cannot fail to interest his +readers; and what more does literary talent +mean?</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_149' name='page_149'></a>149</span></div> +<p>Distinguishing these several aptitudes, historians +will be found to fall into two classes, +according as there predominates in them the +critical or the imaginative faculty. Though no +one can attain greatness without both gifts, still +they may be present in very unequal degrees. +Some will investigate tangible facts and their +relations with special care, occupying themselves +chiefly with that constitutional and diplomatic +side of history in which positive conclusions are +(from the comparative abundance of records) most +easily reached. Others will be drawn towards +the dramatic and personal elements in history, +primarily as they appear in the lives of famous +individual men, secondarily as they are seen, +more dimly but not less impressively, in groups +and masses of men, and in a nation at large, +and will also observe and dwell upon incidents +of private life or features of social and +religious custom, which the student of stately +politics passes by.</p> +<p>As Coleridge, when he divided thinkers into +two classes, took Plato as the type of one, Aristotle +of the other, so we may take as representatives of +these two tendencies among historians Thucydides +for the critical and philosophical, Herodotus for the +imaginative and picturesque. The former does not +indeed want a sense of the dramatic grandeur of a +situation; his narrative of the later part of the +Athenian expedition against Syracuse is like a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_150' name='page_150'></a>150</span> +piece of Æschylus in prose. So too Herodotus +is by no means without a philosophical view of +things, nor without a critical instinct, although +his generalisations are sometimes vague or +fanciful, and his critical apparatus rudimentary. +Each is so splendid because each is wide, with +the great gifts largely, although not equally, +developed.</p> +<p>Green was an historian of the Herodotean +type. He possessed capacities which belong to +the other type also; he was critical, sceptical, +perhaps too sceptical, and philosophical. Yet +the imaginative quality was the leading and distinctive +quality in his mind and writing. An +ordinary reader, if asked what was the main +impression given by the <i>Short History of the +English People</i>, would answer that it was the +impression of picturesqueness and vividity—picturesqueness +in attention to the externals of +the life described, vividity in the presentation +of that life itself.</p> +<p>I remember to have once, in talking with +Green about Greek history, told him how I +had heard Mr. Jowett, in discussing the ancient +historians, disparage Herodotus and declare him +unworthy to be placed near Thucydides. Green +answered, almost with indignation, that to say +such a thing showed that eminent scholars might +have little feeling for history. “Great as Thucydides +is,” he said, “Herodotus is far greater, or +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_151' name='page_151'></a>151</span> +at any rate far more precious. His view was so +much wider.” I forget the rest of the conversation, +but what he meant was that Herodotus, to +whom everything in the world was interesting, +and who has told us something about every +country he visited or heard of, had a more fruitful +conception of history than his Athenian successor, +who practically confined himself to politics in the +narrower sense of the term, and that even the +wisdom of the latter is not so valuable to us as the +flood of miscellaneous information which Herodotus +pours out about everything in the early world—a +world about which we should know comparatively +little if his book had not been preserved.</p> +<p>This deliverance was thoroughly characteristic +of Green’s own view of history. Everything was +interesting to him because his imagination laid +hold of everything. When he travelled, nothing +escaped his quick eye, perpetually ranging over +the aspects of places and society. When he went +out to dinner, he noted every person present whom +he had not known before, and could tell you afterwards +something about them. He had a theory, +so to speak, about each of them, and indeed about +every one with whom he exchanged a dozen +words. When he read the newspaper, he seemed +to squeeze all the juice out of it in a few minutes. +Nor was it merely the large events that fixed his +mind; he drew from stray notices of minor current +matters evidence of principles or tendencies +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_152' name='page_152'></a>152</span> +which escaped other people’s eyes. You never +left him without having new light thrown upon +the questions of the hour. His memory was retentive, +but more remarkable was the sustained +keenness of apprehension with which he read, +and which made him fasten upon everything in +a book or in talk which was significant, and +could be made the basis for an illustration of +some view. He had the Herodotean quality of +reckoning nothing, however small or apparently +remote from the main studies of his life, to +be trivial or unfruitful. His imagination vitalised +the small things, and found a place for them +in the pictures he was always sketching out.</p> +<p>As this faculty of discerning hidden meanings +and relations was one index and consequence +of his imaginative power, so another was found +in that artistic gift to which I have referred. To +give literary form to everything was a necessity +of his intellect. He could not tell an anecdote +or repeat a conversation without unconsciously +dramatising it, putting into people’s mouths better +phrases than they would have themselves employed, +and giving a finer point to the moral +which the incident expressed. Verbal accuracy +suffered, but what he thought the inner truth +came out the more fully.</p> +<p>Though he wrote very fast, and in the most +familiar way, the style of his more serious letters +was as good, I might say as finished, as that of his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_153' name='page_153'></a>153</span> +books. Every one of them had a beginning, +middle, and end. The ideas were developed in an +apt and graceful order, the sentences could all be +construed, the diction was choice. It was the +same with the short articles which he at one time +used to write for the <i>Saturday Review</i>. They +are little essays, some of them worthy to live not +only for the excellent matter they contain, but +for the delicate refinement of their form. Yet +they were all written swiftly, and sometimes in +the midst of physical exhaustion. The friend I +have previously quoted describes the genesis of +one. Green had reached the town of Troyes +early one morning with two companions, and +immediately started off to explore it, darting +hither and thither through the streets like a dog +trying to find a scent. In two or three hours the +examination was complete. The friends lunched +together, took the train on to Basel, got there +late, and went off to bed. Green, however, wrote +before he slept, and laid on the breakfast-table +next morning, an article on Troyes, in which its +characteristic features were brought out and connected +with its fortunes and those of the Counts +of Champagne during some centuries, an article +which was really a history in miniature. Then they +went out together to look at Basel, and being asked +some question about that city he gave on the spur +of the moment a sketch of its growth and character +equally vivid and equally systematic, grouping all +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_154' name='page_154'></a>154</span> +he had to say round two or three leading theories. +Yet he had never been in either place before, and +had not made a special study of either. He could +apparently have done the same for many another +town in France or the Rhineland.</p> +<p>Nothing struck one so much in daily intercourse +with him as his passionate interest in +human life. The same quickness of sympathy +which had served him well in his work among +the East End poor, enabled him to pour feeling +into the figures of a bygone age, and become +the most human, and in so far the most real and +touching, of all who have dealt with English +history. Whether or not his portraits are true, +they always seem to breathe.</p> +<p>Men and women—that is to say, such of them +as have characteristics pronounced enough to +make them classifiable—may be divided into +those whose primary interests are in nature and +what relates to nature, and those whose primary +interests are in and for man. Green was the most +striking type I have known of the latter class, +not merely because his human interests were +strong, but also because they excluded, to a +degree singular in a mind so versatile, interests +in purely natural things. He did not seem to +care for or seek to know any of the sciences of +nature<a name='FNanchor_0019' id='FNanchor_0019'></a><a href='#Footnote_0019' class='fnanchor'>[24]</a> except in so far as they bore directly +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_155' name='page_155'></a>155</span> +upon man’s life, and were capable of explaining +it or of serving it. He had a keen eye for +country, for the direction and character of hills, +the position and influence of rivers, forests, and +marshes, of changes in the line of land and sea. +Readers of <i>The Making of England</i> will recall +the picture of the physical aspects of Britain when +the Teutonic invaders entered it as an unsurpassed +piece of reconstructive description. So +on a battle-field or in an historical town, his +vision of the features of the ground or the site +was unerring. But he perceived and enjoyed +natural beauty chiefly in reference to human life. +The study of the battle-field and the town site +were aids to the comprehension of historical +events. The exquisite landscape was exquisite +because it was associated with the people dwelling +there, with the processes of their political growth, +with their ideas or their social usages. I remember +to have had from him the most vivid +descriptions of the towns of the Riviera and +of Capri, where he used to pass the winter, but +he never touched on anything which did not +illustrate or intertwine itself with the life of the +people, leaving one uninformed on matters purely +physical. Facts about the character of the +mountains, the relation of their ranges to one +another, or their rocks, or the trees and flowers +of their upper regions, the prospects their +summits command, the scenes of beauty in their +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_156' name='page_156'></a>156</span> +glens, or beside their wood-embosomed lakes, +all, in fact, which the mountain lover delights +in, and which are to him a part of the mountain +ardour, of the passion for pure nature unsullied +by the presence of man—all this was cold to +him. But as soon as a touch of human life fell +like a sunbeam across the landscape, all became +warm and lovable.</p> +<p>It was the same with art. With an historian’s +delight in the creative ages and their work, he +had a fondness for painting and sculpture, and +could so describe what he saw in the galleries and +churches of Italy as to bring out meanings one +had not perceived before. But here, too, it was +the human element that fascinated him. Technical +merits, though he observed them, as he observed +most things, were forgotten; he dwelt only on +what the picture expressed or revealed. Pure +landscape painting gave him little pleasure.</p> +<p>It seems a truism to say that one who writes +history ought to care for all that bears upon +man in the present in order that he may comprehend +what bore upon him in the past. This +roaring loom of Time, these complex physical +and moral forces playing round us, and driving +us hither and thither by such a strange and +intricate interlacement of movements that we +seem to perceive no more than what is next us, +and are unable to say whither we are tending, +ought to be always before the historian’s mind. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_157' name='page_157'></a>157</span> +But there are few who have tried, as Green +tried, to follow every flash of the shuttle, and to +discover a direction and a relation amidst apparent +confusion, for there are few who have taken +so wide a view of the historian’s functions, and +have so distinctly set before them as their object +the comprehension and realisation and description +of the whole field of bygone human life. +The Past was all present to him in this sense, +that he saw and felt in it not only those large +events which annalists or state papers have recorded, +but the everyday life of the people, their +ideas, their habits, their external surroundings. +And the Present was always as if past to him +in this sense, that in spite of his strong political +feelings, he looked at it with the eye of a +philosophical observer, trying to disengage principles +from details, permanent tendencies from +passing outbursts. His imagination visualised, +so to speak, the phenomena as in a picture; his +speculative faculty tried to harmonise them, +measure them, and forecast their effects. Hence +it was a necessity to him to know what was +passing in the world. The first thing he did +every day, whatever other pressure there might +be on him, was to read the daily newspaper. +The last thing that he ceased to read, when what +remained of life began to be counted by hours, +was the daily newspaper. This warm interest in +mankind is the keynote of his <i>History of the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_158' name='page_158'></a>158</span> +English People</i>. It is the whole people that is +ever present to him, as it had been present before +to few other historians.</p> +<p>Such power of imagination and sympathy as I +have endeavoured to describe is enough to make +a brilliant writer, yet not necessarily a great +historian. One must see how far the other +qualifications, accuracy, acuteness of observation, +and judgment, are also brought into action.</p> +<p>His accuracy has been much impeached. When +the first burst of applause that welcomed the +<i>Short History</i> had subsided, several critics began +to attack it on the score of minor errors. They +pointed out a number of statements of fact which +were doubtful, and others which were incorrect, +and spread in some quarters the impression that +Green was a careless and untrustworthy writer. +I do not deny that there are in the first editions +of the <i>Short History</i> some assertions made +more positively than the evidence warrants, +some pictures drawn from exceedingly slender +materials. Mr. Skene remarks of the account +given of the battle between the Jutes and the +Britons which took place in the middle of the fifth +century, somewhere near Aylesford in Kent, and +about which we really know scarcely anything, +“Mr. Green describes it as if he had been present.” +The temptation to such liberties is strong where +the treatment of a period is summary. A writer +who compresses the whole history of England +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_159' name='page_159'></a>159</span> +into eight hundred pages of small octavo, making +his narrative not a bare narrative but a picture +full of colour and incident—incident which, for +brevity’s sake, must often be given by allusion—cannot +be always interrupting the current of the +story to indicate doubts or quote authorities for +every statement in which there may be an +element of conjecture; and it is probable that +when the authorities are scrutinised their result +will sometimes appear different from that which +the author has presented. On this head the +<i>Short History</i> may be admitted to have occasionally +purchased vividity at the price of exactitude. +Of mistakes, strictly so called—<i>i.e.</i> statements +demonstrably incorrect and therefore ascribable +to haste or carelessness—there are enough to +make a show under the hands of a hostile critic, +yet not more than one is prepared to expect +from any but the most careful scholars. The +book falls far short of the accuracy of Thirlwall +or Ranke or Stubbs, short even of the accuracy +of Gibbon or Carlyle; but it is not greatly +below the standard of Grote or Macaulay or +Robertson, it is equal to the standard of Milman, +above that of David Hume. I take famous +names, and could put a better face on the matter +by choosing for comparison divers contemporary +writers whose literary eminence is higher than +their historical. And Green’s mistakes, although +pretty numerous, were (for they have been corrected +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_160' name='page_160'></a>160</span> +in later editions) nearly all in small matters. +He puts an event, let us say, in 1340 which +happened in the November of 1339; he calls a +man John whose name was William. These are +mistakes to the eye of a civil service examiner, +but they seldom make any difference to the +general reader, for they do not affect the doctrines +and pictures which the book contains, and in +which lies its permanent value as well as its literary +charm. As Bishop Stubbs says, “Like other +people, Green makes mistakes sometimes; but +scarcely ever does the correction of his mistakes +affect either the essence of the picture or the +force of the argument.... All his work was +real and original work; few people besides those +who knew him well would see under the charming +ease and vivacity of his style the deep research +and sustained industry of the laborious student.” +It may be added that Green’s later and more +detailed works, <i>The Making of England</i> and +<i>The Conquest of England</i>, though they contain +plenty of debatable matter, as in the paucity +of authentic data any such book must do, have +been charged with few errors in matters of +fact.</p> +<p>In considering his critical gift, it is well to distinguish +those two elements of acute perception +and sober judgment which I have already specified, +for he possessed the former in larger measure than +the latter. The same activity of mind which made +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_161' name='page_161'></a>161</span> +him notice everything while travelling or entering +a company of strangers, played incessantly +upon the historical data of his work, and supplied +him with endless theories as to the meaning of +a statement, the source it came from, the way it +had been transmitted, the conditions under which +it was made. No one could be more acute and +penetrating in what the Germans call <i>Quellenforschung</i>, +the collection and investigation and +testing of the sources of history, nor could any +one be more painstaking. Errors of view, apart +from those trivial inaccuracies already referred to, +did not arise from an indolence that left any +stone unturned, but rather from an occupation +with the leading idea which had drawn his +attention away from the details of time and place. +The ingenuity with which he built up theories +was as admirable as the art with which he +stated them. People whom that art fascinated +sometimes fancied that the charm lay entirely in +the style. But the style was only a part of the +craftsmanship. The facility in theorising, the +power of grouping facts under new aspects, the +skill in gathering and sifting evidence, were +as remarkable as those artistic qualities which +expressed themselves in the paragraphs and +sentences and phrases. What danger there was +arose from this fecundity. His mind was so +fertile, could see so much in a theory and apply +it so dexterously, that his judgment was sometimes +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_162' name='page_162'></a>162</span> +dazzled by the brilliance of his ingenuity. +I do not think he loved his theories specially +because they were his own, for he often modified +them, and was ready to consider any one else’s +suggestions; but he had a passion for light, and +when a new view seemed to him to explain things +previously dark, he wanted the patience to suspend +his judgment and abide in uncertainty. +Some of his hypotheses he himself dropped. +Some others he probably would have dropped, +as the authorities he respected have not embraced +them. Others have made their way into general +acceptance, and may become still more useful as +future research works them out. But, whether +right or wrong, they were instructive. Every +one of them is based upon facts whose importance +had not been so fully seen before, and +suggests a point of view worth considering. +Green’s view may sometimes appear fanciful: it +is never foolish, or superficial, or perverse. And +so far from being credulous, his natural tendency +was towards doubt.</p> +<p>Inventive as his mind was, it was also solvent +and sceptical. Seldom is a strong imagination +coupled with so unsparing a criticism as that +which he applied to the materials on which the +constructive faculty had to work. His later +tendencies were rather towards scepticism, and +towards what one may call a severe and ascetic +view of history. While writing <i>The Making of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_163' name='page_163'></a>163</span> +England</i> and <i>The Conquest of England</i>, he used +to lament the scantiness of the data and the +barren dryness which he feared the books would +consequently show. “How am I to make anything +of these meagre entries of marches and +battles which are the only materials for the history +of whole centuries? Here are the Norsemen +and Danes ravaging and occupying the country; +we learn hardly anything about them from English +sources, and nothing at all from Danish. How +can one conceive and describe them? how have +any comprehension of what England was like in +the districts the Northmen took and ruled?” I +tried to get him to work at the Norse Sagas, and +remember in particular to have entreated him +when he came to the battle of Brunanburh to +eke out the pitifully scanty records of that fight +from the account given of it in the story of +the Icelandic hero, Egil, son of Skallagrim. +But he answered that the Saga was unhistorical, +a bit of legend written down more than a +century after the events, and that he could not, +by using it in the text, appear to trust it, or to +mix up authentic history with what was possibly +fable. It was urged that he could guard himself +in a note from being supposed to take it +for more than what it was, a most picturesque +embellishment of his tale. But he stood firm. +Throughout these two last books, he steadily +refrained from introducing any matter, however +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_164' name='page_164'></a>164</span> +lively or romantic, which could not stand the +test of his stringent criticism, and used laughingly +to tell how Dean Stanley had long ago said to +him, after reading one of his earliest pieces, “I +see you are in danger of growing picturesque. +Beware of it. I have suffered for it.”</p> +<p>If in these later years he reined in his +imagination more tightly, the change was due +to no failing in his ingenuity. Nothing in +his work shows higher constructive ability than +<i>The Making of England</i>. He had to deal +with a time which has left us scarcely any +authentic records, and to piece together his narrative +and his picture of the country out of these +records, and the indications, faint and scattered, +and often capable of several interpretations, which +are supplied by the remains of Roman roads and +villas, the names of places, the boundaries of local +divisions, the casual statements of writers many +centuries later. What he has given us remains +an enduring witness to his historical power. +For here it is not a question of mere brilliance +of style. The result is due to patience, penetration, +and the careful weighing of evidence, +joined to that faculty of realising things in +the concrete by which a picture is conjured up +out of a mass of phenomena, everything falling +into its place under laws which seem to prove +themselves as soon as they are stated.</p> +<p>Of his style nothing need be said, for his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_165' name='page_165'></a>165</span> +readers have felt its charm. But it deserves +to be remarked that this accomplished master +of words had little verbal memory. He used +to say that he could never recollect a phrase in +its exact form, and in his books he often unconsciously +varied, writing from memory, some expression +whose precise form is on record. Nor +had he any turn for languages. German he knew +scarcely at all, a fact which makes the range of his +historical knowledge appear more striking; and +though he had spent several winters in Italy, he +could not speak Italian except so far as he +needed it for the inn or the railway. The want +of mere verbal memory partly accounts for this +deficiency, but it was not unconnected with the +vehemence of his interest in the substance of +things. He was so anxious to get at the kernel +that he could not stop to examine the nut. In +this absence of linguistic gifts, as well as in the +keenness of his observation (and in his shortsightedness), +he resembled Dean Stanley, who, +though he had travelled in and brought back all +that was best worth knowing from every country +in Europe, had no facility in any language but his +own.</p> +<p>Green was not one of those whose personality +is unlike their books, for there was in both the +same fertility, the same vivacity, the same quickness +of sympathy. Nevertheless, his conversation +seemed to give an even higher impression +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_166' name='page_166'></a>166</span> +of intellectual power than did his writings, +because it was so swift and so spontaneous. +Such talk has rarely been heard in our time, so +gay was it, so vivid, so various, so full of anecdote +and illustration, so acute in criticism, so +candid in consideration, so graphic in description, +so abundant in sympathy, so flashing in +insight, so full of colour and emotion as well as +of knowledge and thought. One had to forbid +one’s self to visit him in the evening, because +it was impossible to get away before two o’clock +in the morning. And, unlike many famous +talkers, he was just as willing to listen as to +speak. One of the charms of his company +was that it made a man feel better than his +ordinary self. His appreciation of whatever had +any worth in it, his comments and replies, +so stimulated the interlocutor’s mind that it +moved faster and could hit upon apter expressions +than at any other time. The same +gifts which shone in his conversation, lucid +arrangement of ideas, ready command of words, +and a power in perceiving the tendencies of +those whom he addressed, would have made +him an admirable public speaker. I do not +remember that he ever did speak, in his later +years, to any audience larger than a committee +of twenty. But he was an eloquent preacher. +The first time I ever saw him was in St. Philip’s +Church at Stepney about 1866, and I shall never +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_167' name='page_167'></a>167</span> +forget the impression made on me by the impassioned +sentences that rang through the church +from the fiery little figure in the pulpit with its +thin face and bright black eyes.</p> +<p>What Green accomplished seems to those who +used to listen to him little in comparison with +what he might have done had longer life and a +more robust body been granted him. Some of +his finest gifts would not have found their full +scope till he came to treat of a period where the +materials for history are ample, and where he +could have allowed himself space to deal with +them—such a period, for instance, as that of his +early choice, the Angevin kings of England. +Yet, even basing themselves on what he has +done, they may claim for him a place among the +foremost writers of his time. He left behind him +no one who combined so many of the best gifts. +There were among his contemporaries historians +more learned and equally industrious. There were +two or three whose accuracy was more scrupulous, +their judgment more uniformly sober and cautious. +But there was no one in whom so much knowledge +and so wide a range of interests were united +to such ingenuity, acuteness, and originality, as +well as to such a power of presenting results in +rich, clear, pictorial language. A master of style +may be a worthless historian. We have instances. +A skilful investigator and sound reasoner may be +unreadable. The conjunction of fine gifts for +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_168' name='page_168'></a>168</span> +investigation with fine gifts for exposition is a +rare conjunction, which cannot be prized too +highly, for while it advances historical science, it +brings historical methods, as well as historical +facts, within the horizon of the ordinary reader.</p> +<p>Of the services Green rendered to English +history, the first, and that which was most +promptly appreciated, was the intensity with +which he realised, and the skill with which he +portrayed, the life of the people of England as +a whole, and taught his readers that the exploits +of kings and the intrigues of ministers, and the +struggles of parties in Parliament, are, after all, +secondary matters, and important chiefly as they +affect the welfare or stimulate the thoughts and +feelings of the great mass of undistinguished +humanity in whose hands the future of a nation +lies. He changed the old-fashioned distribution +of our annals according to reigns and dynasties +into certain periods, showing that such divisions +often obscure the true connection of events, and +suggesting new and better conceptions of the +periods into which the record of English progress +naturally falls. And, lastly, he laid, in his latest +books, a firm and enduring foundation for our +mediæval history by that account of the Teutonic +occupation of England, of the state of the country +as they found it, and the way they conquered and +began to organise it, which I have already dwelt +on as a signal proof of his constructive faculty.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_169' name='page_169'></a>169</span></div> +<p>Many readers will be disposed to place him +near Macaulay, for though he was less weighty +he was more subtle, and not less fascinating. To +fewer perhaps will it occur to compare him with +Gibbon, yet I am emboldened by the opinion of +one of our greatest contemporary historians to +venture on the comparison. There are indeed +wide differences between the two. Green is +as completely a man of the nineteenth century +as Gibbon was a man of the eighteenth. Green’s +style has not the majestic march of Gibbon: it +is quick and eager almost to restlessness. Nor +is his judgment so uniformly grave and sound. +But one may find in his genius what was +characteristic of Gibbon’s also, the combination +of a mastery of multitudinous details, with a large +and luminous view of those far-reaching forces +and relations which govern the fortunes of peoples +and guide the course of empire. This width and +comprehensiveness, this power of massing for the +purposes of argument the facts which his literary +art has just been clothing in its most brilliant +hues, is the highest of a historian’s gifts, and is +the one which seems most surely to establish +Green’s position among the leading historical +minds of his time.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_170' name='page_170'></a>170</span> +<a name='SIR_GEORGE_JESSEL_MASTER_OF_THE_ROLLS' id='SIR_GEORGE_JESSEL_MASTER_OF_THE_ROLLS'></a> +<h2>SIR GEORGE JESSEL, MASTER OF THE ROLLS</h2> +</div> +<p>There is hardly any walk of English life in +which brilliant abilities win so little fame for +their possessor among the public at large as +that of practice at the Chancery bar. A +leading ecclesiastic, or physician, or surgeon, +or financier, or manufacturer, or even a great +man of science, unless his work is done in some +sphere which, like pure mathematics, is far +removed from the comprehension of ordinary +educated men, is sure, in a time like ours, to +become well known to the world and acquire +influence in it. A great advocate practising in +the Common-law Courts is, of course, still more +certain to become a familiar figure. But the cases +which are dealt with by the Courts of Equity, +though they often involve vast sums of money +and raise intricate and important points of +law, mostly turn on questions of a technical +kind, and are seldom what the newspapers call +sensational. Thus it may happen that a practitioner +or a judge in these Courts enjoys an +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_171' name='page_171'></a>171</span> +extraordinary reputation within his profession, +and is by them regarded as one of the ornaments +of his time, while the rest of his fellow-countrymen +know nothing at all about his merits.</p> +<p>This was the case with Sir George Jessel, +though towards the end of his career the admiration +which the Bar felt for his powers began so +far to filter through to the general public that +his premature death was felt to be a national +misfortune.</p> +<p>Jessel (born in 1824, died in 1883) was only +one among many instances England has lately +seen of men of Jewish origin climbing to the +highest distinction. But he was the first instance +of a Jew who, continuing to adhere to the creed of +his forefathers, received a very high office; for Mr. +Disraeli, as every one knows, had been baptized +as a boy, and always professed to be a Christian. +Jessel’s career was not marked by any remarkable +incidents. He rose quickly to eminence at the bar, +being in this aided by his birth; for the Jews in +London, as elsewhere, hold together. There are +among them many solicitors in large practice, and +these take a natural pleasure in pushing forward +any specially able member of their community. +His powers were more fully seen and appreciated +when he became (in 1865) a Queen’s Counsel, +and brought him with unusual speed to the front +rank. He came into Parliament at the general +election of 1868 on the Liberal side, and three +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_172' name='page_172'></a>172</span> +years later was made Solicitor-General in Mr. +Gladstone’s first Government, retaining, as was +then usual, his private practice, which had become +so large that there was scarcely any case of +first-rate importance brought into the Chancery +Courts in which he did not appear. Although +a decided Liberal, as the Jews mostly were +until Lord Beaconsfield’s foreign policy had +begun to lead them into other paths, he had +borne little part in politics till he took his +seat in the House of Commons; and when +he spoke there, he obtained no great success. +Lawyers in the English Parliament are under +the double disadvantage of having had less leisure +than most other members to study and follow +political questions, and of having contracted a +manner and style of speaking not suited to an +assembly which, though deliberative, is not deliberate, +and which listens with impatience to a +technical or forensic method of treating the topics +which come before it.</p> +<p>Jessel’s ability would have soon overcome +the former difficulty, but less easily the latter. +Though he was lucid and powerful in his treatment +of legal topics, and made a quite admirable +law officer in the way of advising ministers and +the public departments, he was never popular +with the House of Commons, for he presented +his views in a hard, dry, dogmatic form, with no +graces of style or delivery. However, he did +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_173' name='page_173'></a>173</span> +not long remain in that arena, but on the retirement +of Lord Romilly from the office of Master +of the Rolls, was in 1873 appointed to succeed him. +In this post his extraordinary gifts found their +amplest sphere. The equity judges in England +used always to sit, and in nearly all cases do still +sit, without a jury to hear causes, with or without +witnesses, and they despatch a great deal of the +heaviest business that is brought into the courts. +Commercial causes of the first importance come +before them, no less than those which relate to +trusts or to real property; and the granting of +injunctions, a specially serious matter, rests chiefly +in their hands. Each equity judge sits alone, and +the suitor may choose before which of them he will +bring his case. Among the four—a number subsequently +increased to five—equity judges of first +instance, Jessel immediately rose to the highest +reputation, so that most of the heavy and difficult +cases were brought into his court. He possessed +a wonderfully quick, as well as powerful, mind, +which got to the kernel of a matter while other +people were still hammering at the shell, and +which applied legal principles just as swiftly and +surely as it mastered a group of complicated facts.</p> +<p>The Rolls Court used to present, while he +presided over it, a curious and interesting sight, +which led young counsel, who had no business +to do there, to frequent it for the mere sake of +watching the Judge. When the leading counsel +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_174' name='page_174'></a>174</span> +for the plaintiff was opening his case, Jessel +listened quietly for the first few minutes only, +and then began to address questions to the +counsel, at first so as to guide his remarks in a +particular direction, then so as to stop his course +altogether and turn his speech into a series of +answers to the Judge’s interrogatories. When, +by a short dialogue of this kind, Jessel had +possessed himself of the vital facts, he would +turn to the leading counsel for the defendant +and ask him whether he admitted such and such +facts alleged by the plaintiff to be true. If these +facts were admitted, the Judge proceeded to +indicate the view he was disposed to take of the +law applicable to the facts, and, by a few more +questions to the counsel on the one side or the +other, as the case might be, elicited their respective +legal grounds of contention. If the facts +were not admitted, it of course became necessary +to call the witnesses or read the affidavits, +processes which the vigorous impatience of +the Judge considerably shortened, for it was a +dangerous thing to read to him any irrelevant +or loosely-drawn paragraph. But more generally +his searching questions and the sort of pressure +he applied so cut down the issues of fact that +there was little or nothing left in controversy +regarding which it was necessary to examine the +evidence in detail, since the counsel felt that +there was no use in putting before him a contention +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_175' name='page_175'></a>175</span> +which they could not sustain under the fire +of his criticism. Then Jessel proceeded to deliver +his opinion and dispose of the case. The affair +was from beginning to end far less an argument +and counter-argument by counsel than an investigation +directly conducted by the Judge himself, +in which the principal function of the counsel +was to answer the Judge’s questions concisely +and exactly, so that the latter might as soon as +possible get to the bottom of the matter. The +Bar in a little while came to learn and adapt +themselves to his ways, and few complained of +being stopped or interrupted by him, because +his interruptions, unlike those of some judges, +were neither inopportune nor superfluous. The +counsel (with scarcely an exception) felt themselves +his inferiors, and recognised not only that +he was better able to handle the case than they +were, but that the manner and style in which they +presented their facts or arguments would make +little difference to the result, because his penetration +was sure to discover the merits of each contention, +and neither eloquence nor pertinacity +would have the slightest effect on his resolute +and self-confident mind. Thus business was +despatched before him with unexampled speed, +and it became a maxim among barristers that, +however low down in the cause-list at the +Rolls your cause might stand, it was never +safe to be away from the court, so rapidly +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_176' name='page_176'></a>176</span> +were cases “crumpled up” or “broken down” +under the blows of this vigorous intellect. +It was more surprising that the suitors, as well +as the Bar and the public generally, acquiesced, +after the first few months, in this way of +doing business. Nothing breeds more discontent +than haste and heedlessness in a judge. +But Jessel’s speed was not haste. He did as +much justice in a day as others could do in a +week; and those few who, dissatisfied with these +rapid methods, tried to reverse his decisions before +the Court of Appeal, were very seldom successful, +although that court then contained in Lord Justice +James and Lord Justice Mellish two unusually +strong men, who would not have hesitated to +differ even from the redoubtable Master of the +Rolls.</p> +<p>As I have mentioned Lord Justice Mellish, I +may turn aside for a moment to say a word regarding +that extraordinary man, who stood along +with Cairns and Roundell Palmer in the foremost +rank of Jessel’s professional contemporaries. +Mellish held for some years before his elevation +to the Bench in 1869 a position unique at the +English Common-law Bar as a giver of opinions +on points of law. As the Israelites in King +David’s day said of Ahithophel that his counsel +was as if a man had inquired at the oracle of +God,<a name='FNanchor_0020' id='FNanchor_0020'></a><a href='#Footnote_0020' class='fnanchor'>[25]</a> so the legal profession deemed Mellish +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_177' name='page_177'></a>177</span> +practically infallible, and held an opinion signed +by him to be equal in weight to a judgment of +the Court of Exchequer Chamber (the then court +of appeal in common-law cases). He was not +effective as an advocate addressing a jury, being +indeed far too good for any jury; but in arguing +a point of law his unerring logic, the lucidity +with which he stated his position, the cogency +and precision with which he drew his inferences, +made it a delight to listen to him. The chain of +ratiocination seemed irrefragable:</p> +<table summary=''><tr><td> +<p class='cg'><span class='greek' title="en d' ethet' akmothetô megan akmona, kopte de desmous">ἐν δ᾽ ἔθετ᾽ ἀκμοθέτῳ μέγαν ἄκμονα, κόπτε δὲ δεσμοὺς</span><br /> +<span class='greek' title="arrhêktous alutous, ophr' empedon authi menoien">ἀρρήκτους ἀλύτους, ὄφρ᾽ ἔμπεδον αὖθι μένοιεν.</span><a name='FNanchor_0021' id='FNanchor_0021'></a><a href='#Footnote_0021' class='fnanchor'>[26]</a></p> +</td></tr></table> +<p>He had, indeed, but one fault as an arguer. +He could not argue a point whose soundness he +doubted as effectively as one in which he had +faith; and when it befell that several points arose +in a case, and the Court seemed disposed to lay +more stress on the one for which he cared little +than on the one he deemed conclusive, he refused +to fall in with their view and continued to insist +upon that which his own mind approved.</p> +<p>I remember to have once heard him and +Cairns argue before the House of Lords (sitting +as the final Court of Appeal) a case relating +to a vessel called the <i>Alexandra</i>—it was a case +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_178' name='page_178'></a>178</span> +arising out of an attempt of the Confederates, +during the American War of Secession, to get +out of a British port a cruiser they had ordered. +Cairns spoke first with all his usual power, and +seemed to have left nothing to be added. But +when Mellish followed on the same side, he set +his points in so strong a light, and placed his +contention on so solid a basis, that even Cairns’s +speech was forgotten, and it seemed impossible +that any answer could be found to Mellish’s +arguments. One felt as if the voice of pure +reason were speaking through his lips.</p> +<p>Such an intellect might seem admirably qualified +for judicial work. But as a judge, Mellish, +admirable though he was in temper, in fairness, +in learning, and in logic, did not win so exceptional +a reputation as he had won at the Bar. People used +to ascribe this partly to his weak health, partly +to the fact that he, who had been a common-law +practitioner, was sitting in a court which heard +equity appeals, and alongside of a quick and +strong colleague reared in the equity courts.<a name='FNanchor_0022' id='FNanchor_0022'></a><a href='#Footnote_0022' class='fnanchor'>[27]</a> +But something may have been due to the fact +that he needed the stimulus of conflict to bring +out the full force of his splendid intelligence. +A circumstance attending the appointment of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_179' name='page_179'></a>179</span> +Mellish illustrates the remark already made +that a great counsel whose work lies apart +from so-called “sensation cases” may remain +unknown to his contemporaries. When Mr. +Gladstone, being then Prime Minister, and +having to select a Lord Justice of Appeal, +was told that Mellish was the fittest man for +the post, he asked, “Can that be the boy +who was my fag at Eton?” He had not +heard of Mellish during the intervening forty +years!</p> +<p>However, I return to the Master of the Rolls. +In dealing with facts, Jessel has never had a +superior, and in our days, perhaps, no rival. He +knew all the ways of the financial and commercial +world. In his treatment of points of law, every +one admitted and admired both an extraordinary +knowledge and mastery of reported cases, and +an extremely acute and exact appreciation of +principles, a complete power of extracting them +from past cases and fitting them to the case in +hand. He had a memory which forgot nothing, and +which, indeed, wearied him by refusing to forget +trivial things. When he delivered an elaborate +judgment it was his delight to run through a long +series of cases, classifying and distinguishing +them. His strength made him bold; he went +further than most judges in readiness to carry +a principle somewhat beyond any decided case, +and to overrule an authority which he did not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_180' name='page_180'></a>180</span> +respect. The fault charged on him was his +tendency, perhaps characteristic of the Hebrew +mind, to take a somewhat hard and dry view +of a legal principle, overlooking its more delicate +shades, and, in the interpretation of +statutes or documents, to adhere too strictly to +the letter, overlooking the spirit. An eminent +lawyer said, “If all judges had been like +Jessel, there might have been no equity.” In +that respect many deemed him inferior to +Lord Cairns, the greatest judge among his contemporaries, +who united to an almost equally +wide and accurate knowledge of the law a grasp +of principles even more broad and philosophical +than Jessel’s was. Be this as it may, the +judgments of the Master of the Rolls, which +fill so many pages of the recent English Law +Reports, are among the best that have ever gone +to build up the fabric of the English law. Except +on two occasions, when he reserved judgment +at the request of his colleagues in the Court +of Appeal, they were delivered on the spur of +the moment, after the conclusion of the arguments, +or of so much of the arguments as he +allowed counsel to deliver; but they have all the +merits of carefully-considered utterances, so clear +and direct is their style, so concisely as well as +cogently are the authorities discussed and the +grounds of decision stated. The bold and sweeping +character which often belongs to them makes +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_181' name='page_181'></a>181</span> +them more instructive as well as more agreeable +reading than the judgments of most modern +judges, whose commonest fault is a timidity +which tries to escape, by dwelling on the details +of the particular case, from the enunciation +of a definite general principle. Positive and +definite Jessel always was. As he put it himself: +“I may be wrong, but I never have any +doubts.”</p> +<p>At the Bar, Jessel had been far from popular; +for his manners were unpolished, and his conduct +towards other counsel overbearing. On the +Bench he improved, and became liked as well as +respected. There was a sort of rough <i>bonhomie</i> +about him, and though he could be disagreeable +on occasions to a leading counsel, especially if +brought from the common-law bar into his court, +he showed a good-humoured wish to deal gently +with young or inexperienced barristers. There +was also an obvious anxiety to do justice, an +impatience of mere technicalities, and a readiness, +remarkable in so strong-willed a man, to hear +what could be said against his own opinion, and to +reconsider it. Besides, a profession is naturally +proud of any one whose talents adorn it, and +whose eminence seems to be communicated to +the whole body.</p> +<p>Ever since, under the Plantagenet kings, the +Chancery became a law court, the office of Master +of the Rolls had been that of a judge of first +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_182' name='page_182'></a>182</span> +instance. In 1881 its character was changed, +and its occupant placed at the head of the +Court of Appeal. Thus it was as an appellate +judge that Jessel latterly sat, giving no less +satisfaction in that capacity than in his former +one, and being indeed confessedly the strongest +judicial intellect (except Lord Cairns) on the +Bench. Outside his professional duties, his chief +interest was in the University of London, at +which he had himself graduated. He was a +member of its senate, and busied himself with its +examinations, being up till the last excessively +fond of work, and finding that of a judge who +sits for five or six hours daily insufficient to +satisfy his appetite. He was not what would +be called a highly cultivated man, although he +knew a great deal beyond the field of law, +mathematics, for instance, and Hebrew literature +and botany, for he had been brought up in +a not very refined circle, and had been absorbed +in legal work during the best years of his life. +But his was an intelligence of extraordinary power +and flexibility, eminently practical, as the Semitic +intellect generally is, and yet thoroughly scientific. +And he was also one of those strong natures who +make themselves disliked while they are fighting +their way to the top, but grow more genial and +more tolerant when they have won what they +sought, and perceive that others admit their pre-eminence. +The services which he rendered as a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_183' name='page_183'></a>183</span> +judge illustrate not only the advantage of throwing +open all places to all comers—the bigotry of +an elder day excluded the Jews from judicial office +altogether—but also the benefit of having a judge +at least equal in ability to the best of those who +practise before him. It was because Jessel was +so easily master in his court that so large and +important a part of the judicial business of the +country was, during many years, despatched with +a swiftness and a success seldom equalled in the +annals of the English Courts.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_184' name='page_184'></a>184</span> +<a name='LORD_CHANCELLOR_CAIRNS' id='LORD_CHANCELLOR_CAIRNS'></a> +<h2>LORD CHANCELLOR CAIRNS</h2> +</div> +<p>Hugh M’Calmont Cairns, afterwards Earl +Cairns (born 1819, died 1885), was one of three +remarkable Scoto-Irishmen whom the north-east +corner of Ulster gave to the United Kingdom +in one generation, and each of whom was foremost +in the career he entered. Lord Lawrence +was the strongest of Indian or Colonial administrators, +and did more than any other man to +save India for England in the crisis of the great +Mutiny of 1857. Lord Kelvin has been, since the +death of Charles Darwin, the first among British +men of science. Lord Cairns was unquestionably +the greatest judge of the Victorian epoch, perhaps +of the nineteenth century.<a name='FNanchor_0023' id='FNanchor_0023'></a><a href='#Footnote_0023' class='fnanchor'>[28]</a> His name and family +were of Scottish origin, but he combined with the +shrewd sense and grim persistency of Scotland +some measure of the keen partisanship which +marks the Irish Orangeman. Born an Episcopalian, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_185' name='page_185'></a>185</span> +he grew up a Tory in politics, an earnest +Low-Church Evangelical in religion; nor did his +opinions in either respect ever seem to alter +during his long life. His great abilities were +perceived both at school (he was educated at +the Academy in Belfast) and at college (Trinity +College, Dublin), and so much impressed the +counsel in whose chambers he studied for a +year in London, that he strongly dissuaded the +young man from returning to Dublin to practise +at the Irish bar, promising him a brilliant career +on the wider theatre of England. The prediction +was verified by the rapidity with which Cairns, +who had, no doubt, the advantage of influential +connections in the City of London, rose into +note. He obtained (as a Conservative) a seat +in Parliament for his native town of Belfast +when only thirty-three years of age, and was +appointed Solicitor-General to Lord Derby’s +second Ministry six years later—a post which +few eminent lawyers have reached before fifty. +In the House of Commons, though at first +somewhat diffident and nervous, he soon proved +himself a powerful as well as ready speaker, and +would doubtless have remained in an assembly +where he was rendering such valuable services +to his party but for the weakness of his lungs +and throat, which had threatened his life since +boyhood. He therefore accepted, in 1867, the +office of Lord Justice of Appeal, with a seat in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_186' name='page_186'></a>186</span> +the House of Lords, and next year was made +Lord Chancellor by Mr. Disraeli, then Prime +Minister, who dismissed Lord Chelmsford, then +Chancellor, in order to have the benefit of Cairns’s +help as a colleague. Disraeli subsequently caused +him to be raised to an earldom.</p> +<p>After Lord Derby’s death, Cairns led the +Tory party in the House of Lords for a time +(replacing the Duke of Richmond when the latter +quitted the leadership), but his very pronounced +Low-Church proclivities, coupled perhaps with a +certain jealousy felt toward him as a newcomer, +prevented him from becoming popular there, so +that ultimately the leadership of that House settled +itself in the hands of Lord Salisbury, a statesman +not superior to Cairns in political judgment or +argumentative power, but without the disadvantage +of being a lawyer, possessing a wider range +of political experience, and in closer sympathy +with the feelings and habits of the titled order. +There were, however, some peers who, when +Lord Beaconsfield died in 1881, desired to see +Cairns chosen to succeed him in the leadership +of the Tory party, then in opposition, in the +Upper Chamber. Whether in opposition or in +power, Cairns took a prominent part in all “full-dress” +political debates in the House of Lords +and in the discussion of legal measures, and was +indeed so absolutely master of the Chamber when +such measures came under discussion, that the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_187' name='page_187'></a>187</span> +Liberal Government, during the years from 1868 +to 1874, and again from 1880 till 1885, could +carry no legal reforms through the House of +Lords except by his permission, which, of +course, was never given when such reforms +could seem to affect any political issue. Yet +the vehemence of his party feeling did not overcast +his judgment. It was mainly through his +interposition (aided by that of Archbishop Tait) +that the House of Lords consented to pass the +Irish Church Bill of 1869, a measure which +Cairns, of course heartily disliking it, accepted +for the sake of saving to the disestablished +Church a part of her funds, since these might +have been lost had the Bill been rejected then +and passed next year by an angrier House of +Commons. Of all the members of Disraeli’s +two Cabinets, he was the one whom Disraeli +himself had been wont most to trust and +most to rely on. In January 1874, when Mr. +Gladstone’s suddenly announced dissolution of +Parliament startled all England one Saturday +morning, Disraeli, who heard of it while still in +bed, was at first frightened, thinking that the +Liberal leader had played his cards boldly and +well, and would carry the elections. When his +chief party manager came to see him he was +found restless and dejected, and cried out, “Send +for Cairns at once.” Lord Cairns was sent for, +came full of vigour, hope, and counsel, and after +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_188' name='page_188'></a>188</span> +an hour’s talk so restored the confidence of his +ally that Disraeli sat down in the best spirits to +compose his electoral manifesto. As everybody +knows, Cairns’s forecast was right, and the Tories +won the general election by a large majority.</p> +<p>For political success Cairns had several qualities +of the utmost value—a stately presence, a clear +head, a resolute will, and splendid oratorical gifts. +He was not an imaginative speaker, nor fitted +to touch the emotions; but he had a matchless +power of statement, and a no less matchless +closeness and cogency in argument. In the +famous controversies of 1866, he showed himself +the clearest and most vigorous thinker among +the opponents of reform, more solid, if less +brilliant, than was Robert Lowe. His diction, +without being exceptionally choice, was pure and +precise, and his manner had a dignity and weight +which seemed to compel your attention even +when the matter was uninteresting. A voice +naturally neither strong nor musical, and sometimes +apt to sound hollow (for the chest was weak), +was managed with great skill; action and gesture +were used sparingly but effectively, and the tall +well-built figure and strongly-marked, somewhat +Roman features, with their haughty and distant +air, deepened the impression of power, courage, +and resolution which was characteristic of the +whole man.</p> +<p>The qualities of oratory I have described +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_189' name='page_189'></a>189</span> +may seem better fitted to a comparatively sober +and sedate assembly like the House of Lords +than to a changeful and excitable assembly +like the House of Commons. Yet, in point of +fact, Cairns spoke better in the Commons than he +did afterwards in the Lords, and would have left +an even higher oratorical reputation had his +career in the popular House been longer and his +displays more numerous. The reason seems to be +that the heat of that House warmed his somewhat +chilly temperament, and roused him to a more +energetic and ardent style of speaking than was +needed in the Upper Chamber, where he and +his friends, commanding a large majority, had +things all their own way. In the House of +Commons he confronted a crowd of zealous +adversaries, and put forth all the forces of his +logic and rhetoric to overcome them. In the more +languid House of Lords he was apt to be didactic, +sometimes even prolix. He overproved his own +case without feeling the need, which he would have +felt in the Commons, of overthrowing the case of +the other side; his manner wanted animation and +his matter variety. Still, he was a great speaker, +greater as a speaker upon legal topics, where a +power of exact statement and lucid exposition is +required, than any one he left behind him.</p> +<p>Why, it may be asked, with these gifts, and +with so much firmness and energy of character, +did he not play an even more conspicuous part +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_190' name='page_190'></a>190</span> +in politics, and succeed, after Lord Beaconsfield’s +death, to the chieftaincy of the Tory party? +The answer is to be found partly in the prejudice +which still survives in England against legal +politicians, partly in certain defects of his own +personality. Although sincerely pious, and exemplary +in all the relations of domestic life, he +was ungenial and unbending in social intercourse. +Few equally eminent men of our time have had so +narrow a circle of personal friends. There was a +dryness, a coldness, and an appearance of reserve +and hauteur about his manner which repelled +strangers, and kept acquaintanceship from ripening +into friendship. To succeed as a political leader, a +man must usually (I do not say invariably, because +there are a few remarkable instances—Mr. Parnell’s +would appear to be one of them—to the contrary) +at least seem sympathetic; must be able to enter +into the feelings of his followers, and show himself +interested in them not merely as party +followers, but as human beings. There must be +a certain glow, a certain effluence of feeling about +him, which makes them care for him and rally +to him as a personality. Whether Lord Cairns +wanted warmth of heart, or whether it was that an +inner warmth failed to pierce the cloak of reserve +and pride which he habitually wore, I do not +attempt to determine. But the defect told heavily +against him. He never became a familiar figure +to the mass of his party, a person whose features +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_191' name='page_191'></a>191</span> +they knew, at whose name they would cheer; +and nowadays all leaders, to whatever party they +belong, find a source of strength in winning this +kind of popularity. The quality which Americans +call magnetism is perhaps less essential +in England than in the country which distinguished +and named it; but it is helpful even +in England. Cairns, though an Irishman, was +wholly without it.</p> +<p>In the field of law, where passion has no +place, and even imagination must be content +to move with clipped wings along the ground, +the merits of Lord Cairns’s intellect showed +to the best advantage. At the Chancery bar he +was one of a trio who had not been surpassed, if +ever equalled, during the nineteenth century, and +whom none of our now practising advocates rivals. +The other two were Mr., afterwards Lord Justice, +Rolt, and Mr. Roundell Palmer, afterwards Lord +Chancellor Selborne. All were admirable lawyers, +but, of the three, Rolt excelled in his spirited presentation +of a case and in the lively vigour of his +arguments. Palmer was conspicuous for exhaustless +ingenuity, and for a subtlety which sometimes +led him away into reasonings too fine for the +court to follow. Cairns was broad, massive, +convincing, with a robust urgency of logic which +seemed to grasp and fix you, so that while he +spoke you could fancy no conclusion possible save +that toward which he moved. His habit was to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_192' name='page_192'></a>192</span> +seize upon what he deemed the central and vital +point of the case, throwing the whole force of +his argument upon that one point, and holding +the judge’s mind fast to it.</p> +<p>All these famous men were raised to the judicial +bench. Rolt remained there for a few months +only, so his time was too short to permit him to +enrich our jurisprudence and leave a memory of +himself in the Reports. Palmer sat in the House +of Lords from his accession to the Chancellorship +in 1872 till his death in 1896, and, while fully +sustaining his reputation as a man of eminent +legal capacity, was, on the whole, less brilliant as a +judge than he had been as an advocate, because a +tendency to over-refinement is more dangerous +in the judicial than in the forensic mind. He +made an admirable Chancellor, and showed himself +more industrious and more zealous for law +reform than did Cairns. But Cairns was the +greater judge, and became to the generation +which argued before him a model of judicial excellence. +In hearing a cause he was singularly +patient, rarely interrupting counsel, and then only +to put some pertinent question. His figure was +so still, his countenance so impassive, that people +sometimes doubted whether he was really attending +to all that was urged at the bar. But when +the time came for him to deliver judgment, +which in the House of Lords is done in the form +of a speech addressed to the House in moving +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_193' name='page_193'></a>193</span> +or supporting a motion that is to become the judgment +of the tribunal, it was seen how fully he had +apprehended the case in all its bearings. His +deliverances were never lengthy, but they were +exhaustive. They went straight to the vital principles +on which the question turned, stated these +in the most luminous way, and applied them with +unerring exactitude to the particular facts. It is +as a storehouse of fundamental doctrines that his +judgments are so valuable. They disclose less +knowledge of case-law than do those of some other +judges; but Cairns was not one of the men who +love cases for their own sake, and he never cared +to draw upon, still less to display, more learning +than was needed for the matter in hand. It +was in the grasp of the principles involved, in +the breadth of view which enabled him to see +these principles in their relation to one another, in +the precision of the logic which drew conclusions +from the principles, in the perfectly lucid language +in which the principles were expounded and +applied, that his strength lay. Herein he surpassed +the most eminent of contemporary judges, +the then Master of the Rolls, for while Jessel had +perhaps a quicker mind than Cairns, he had not so +wide a mind, nor one so thoroughly philosophical +in the methods by which it moved.</p> +<p>Outside the spheres of law and politics, Cairns’s +only interest was in religion. He did not seem, +although a good classical scholar and a competent +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_194' name='page_194'></a>194</span> +mathematician, to care either for letters or for +science. But he was a Sunday-school teacher +nearly all his life. Prayer-meetings were held +at his house, at which barristers, not otherwise +known for their piety, but believed to desire +county court judgeships, were sometimes seen. +He used to take the chair at missionary and +other philanthropic meetings. He was surrounded +by evangelisers and clergymen. But +nothing softened the austerity or melted the ice +of his manners. Neither did the great position +he had won seem to give a higher and broader +quality to his statesmanship. It is true that in +law he was wholly free from the partisanship +which tinged his politics. No one was more +perfectly fair upon the bench; no one more +honestly anxious to arrive at a right decision. +And as a law reformer, although he effected less +than might have been hoped from his abilities or +expected from the absolute sway which he exercised +while Chancellor in Lord Beaconsfield’s +Government from 1874 to 1880, he was free from +prejudice, and willing to sweep away antiquated +rules or usages if they seemed to block the +channel of speedy justice. But in politics this +impartiality and elevation vanished even after he +had risen so high that he did not need to humour +the passions or confirm the loyalty of his own +associates. He seemed to be not merely a party +man, which an English politician is forced to be, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_195' name='page_195'></a>195</span> +because if he stands outside party he cannot effect +anything, but a partisan—that is, a man wholly +devoted to his party, who sees everything through +its eyes, and argues every question in its interests. +He gave the impression of being either unwilling +or unable to rise to a higher and more truly +national view, and sometimes condescended to +arguments whose unsoundness his penetrating +intellect could hardly have failed to detect. His +professional tone had been blameless, but at the +bar the path of rectitude is plain and smooth, and +a scrupulous mind finds fewer cases of conscience +present themselves in a year than in Parliament +within a month. Yet if in this respect Cairns +failed to reach a level worthy of his splendid +intellect, the defect was due not to any selfish +view of his own interest, but rather to the narrowness +of the groove into which his mind had fallen, +and to the atmosphere of Orange sentiment in +which he had grown up. As a politician he is +already beginning to be forgotten; but as a judge +he will be held in honourable remembrance as +one of the five or six most brilliant luminaries +that have adorned the English bench since those +remote days<a name='FNanchor_0024' id='FNanchor_0024'></a><a href='#Footnote_0024' class='fnanchor'>[29]</a> in which the beginning of legal +memory is placed.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_196' name='page_196'></a>196</span> +<a name='BISHOP_FRASER' id='BISHOP_FRASER'></a> +<h2>BISHOP FRASER</h2> +</div> +<p>James Fraser, Bishop of Manchester from 1870 +till 1885, was born in Gloucestershire, of a Scottish +family, in 1818, and died at Manchester in 1885.<a name='FNanchor_0025' id='FNanchor_0025'></a><a href='#Footnote_0025' class='fnanchor'>[30]</a> +He took no prominent part in ecclesiastical politics, +and no part at all in general politics. Though +a sound classical scholar in the old-fashioned +sense of the term—he won the Ireland University +Scholarship at Oxford, then and still the most +conspicuous prize in the field of classics—he was +not an exceptionally cultivated man, and he never +wrote anything except official reports and episcopal +charges. Neither was he, although a ready +and effective speaker, gifted with the highest +kind of eloquence. Neither was he a profound +theologian. Yet his character and career are of +permanent interest, for he created not merely a +new episcopal type, but (one may almost say) +a new ecclesiastical type within the Church of +England.</p> +<p>Till some sixty or seventy years ago the +normal English bishop was a rich, dignified, and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_197' name='page_197'></a>197</span> +rather easy-going magnate, aristocratic in his +tastes and habits, moderate in his theology, sometimes +to the verge of indifferentism, quite as much +a man of the world as a pastor of souls. He had +usually obtained his preferment by his family connections, +or by some service rendered to the court +or a political chief—perhaps even by solicitation +or intrigue. Now and then eminence in learning +or literature raised a man to the bench: there +were, for instance, the “Greek play” bishops, +such as Dr. Monk of Gloucester, whose fame +rested on their editions of the Attic dramatists; +and the <i>Quarterly Review</i> bishops, such as +Dr. Copleston, of Llandaff, whose powerful pen, +as well as his wise administration of the great +Oxford College over which he long presided, +amply justified his promotion. So even in the +eighteenth century the illustrious Butler had +been Bishop of Durham, as in Ireland the +illustrious Berkeley had been Bishop of Cloyne. +But, on the whole, the bishops of our grandfathers’ +days were more remarkable for their +prudence and tact, their adroitness or suppleness, +than for intellectual or moral superiority to +the rest of the clergy. Their own upper-class +world, and the middle class which, in the main, +took its view of English institutions from the +upper class, respected them as a part of the solid +fabric of English society, but they were a mark +for Radical invective and for literary sneers. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_198' name='page_198'></a>198</span> +Their luxurious pomp and ease were incessantly +contrasted with the simplicity of the apostles and +the poverty of curates, and the abundance among +them of the gifts that befit the senate or the +drawing-room was compared with the rarity of the +graces that adorn a saint. The comparison was +hardly fair, for saints are scarce, and a good bishop +needs some qualities which a saint may lack.</p> +<p>That revival within the Church of England +which went on in various forms from 1800 till +1870, at first Low Church or Evangelical in its +tendencies, latterly more conspicuously High +Church and Ritualist, began from below and +worked upwards till at length it reached the +bishops. Lord Palmerston, influenced by Lord +Shaftesbury, filled the vacant sees that fell to him +with earnest men, sometimes narrow, sometimes +deficient in learning, but often good preachers, and +zealous for the doctrines they held. When the +High Churchmen found their way to the Bench, +as they did very largely under Lord Derby’s and +Mr. Gladstone’s rule, they showed as much theological +zeal as the Evangelicals, and perhaps more +talent for administration. The popular idea of +what may be expected from a bishop rose, and the +bishops rose with the idea. As Bishop of Oxford, +Dr. Samuel Wilberforce was among the first to +make himself powerfully felt through his diocese. +His example told upon other prelates, and prime +ministers grew more anxious to select energetic +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_199' name='page_199'></a>199</span> +and popular men. So it came to pass that the +bishops began to be among the foremost men in +the Church of England. Some, like Dr. Magee +of Peterborough, and afterwards of York, were +brilliant orators; some, like Dr. Lightfoot of +Durham, profound scholars; some, like Dr. +Temple of Exeter, able and earnest administrators. +There remained but few who had not +some good claim to the dignity they enjoyed. +So it may be said, when one compares the later +Victorian bishops with their Georgian predecessors, +that no class in the country has improved +more. Few now sneer at them, for no set of men +take a more active and more creditable part in the +public business of the country. Their incomes, +curtailed of late years in the case of the richer +sees, are no more than sufficient for the expenses +which fall upon them, and they work as hard as +any other men for their salaries. Though the +larger sees have been divided, the reduction of +the toil of bishops thus effected has been less than +the addition to it due to the growth of population +and the increased activity of the clergy. The +only defect which the censorious still impute to +them is a certain episcopal conventionality, a disposition +to try to please everybody by the use of +vague professional language, a tendency to think +too much about the Church as a church establishment, +and to defer to clerical opinion when they +ought to speak and act with an independence +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_200' name='page_200'></a>200</span> +born of their individual opinions. Some of them, +as, for instance, the three I have just mentioned, +were not open to this reproach. It was one +of the merits and charms of Fraser that he was +absolutely free from any such tendency. Other +men, such as Bishop Lightfoot, have been not +less eminent models of the virtues which ought +to characterise a great Christian pastor; but +Fraser (appointed some time before Lightfoot) +was the first to be an absolutely unconventional +and, so to speak, unepiscopal bishop. His career +marked a new departure and set a new example.</p> +<p>Fraser spent the earlier years of his manhood +in Oxford, as a tutor in Oriel College, teaching +Thucydides and Aristotle. Like many of his +Oxford contemporaries, he continued through life +to think on Aristotelian lines, and one could trace +them in his sermons. He then took in succession +two college livings, both in quiet nooks in the +South of England, and discharged for nearly +twenty years the simple duties of a parish priest, +unknown to the great world, but making himself +beloved by the people, and doing his best to +improve their condition. The zeal he had shown +in promoting elementary education caused him to +be appointed (in 1865) by the Schools Inquiry +Commissioners to be their Assistant Commissioner +to examine the common-school system of +the United States, and the excellence of his report +thereon attracted the notice of the late Lord +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_201' name='page_201'></a>201</span> +Lyttelton, one of those Commissioners who were +then sitting to investigate the state of secondary +education in England. His report long remained +by far the best general picture of American +schools, conspicuous for its breadth of view, its +clearness of statement, its sympathetic insight +into conditions unlike those he had known in +England. On the recommendation (as has been +generally believed) of Lord Lyttelton and of the +then Bishop of Salisbury, who was a friend of +Dr. Fraser’s, Mr. Gladstone, at that time Prime +Minister, appointed him Bishop of Manchester +in 1870. The diocese of Manchester, which +included all Lancashire except Liverpool and a +small district in the extreme north of the county, +had been under a bishop who, although an able +and learned man, capable of making himself +agreeable when he pleased, was personally unpopular, +and had done little beyond his formal +duties. He lived in a large and handsome +country-house some miles from the city, and was +known by sight to very few of its inhabitants. +(I was familiar with Lancashire in those days, for +I had visited all its grammar-schools as Assistant +Commissioner to the Commission just referred +to, and there was hardly a trace to be found in +it of the bishop’s action.) Fraser had not been +six months in the county before everything was +changed. The country mansion was sold, and he +procured a modest house in one of the less fashionable +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_202' name='page_202'></a>202</span> +suburbs of the city. He preached twice +every Sunday, usually in some parish church, and +spent the week in travelling up and down his +diocese, so that the days were few in which he +was not on the railway. He stretched out the +hand of friendship to the Dissenters (numerous +and powerful in the manufacturing districts), who +had hitherto regarded a bishop as a sort of natural +enemy, gained their confidence, and soon became +as popular with them as with the laity of his +own Church. He associated himself with all +the works of benevolence or public utility which +were in progress, subscribed to all so far as his +means allowed, and was always ready to speak +at a meeting on behalf of any good enterprise. +He dealt in his sermons with the topics of the +day, avoiding party politics, but speaking his +mind on all social and moral questions with a +freedom which sometimes involved him in passing +difficulties, but stimulated the minds of his hearers, +and gave the impression of his own perfect +candour and perfect courage. He used to say +that as he felt it his duty to speak wherever he +was asked to do so, he must needs speak without +preparation, and must therefore expect sometimes +to get into hot water; that this was a pity, but +it was not his fault that he was reported, and +that it was better to run the risk of making +mistakes and suffering for them than to refuse +out of self-regarding caution to give the best of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_203' name='page_203'></a>203</span> +himself to the diocese. He had that true modesty +which makes a man willing to do a thing imperfectly, +at the risk of lowering his intellectual +reputation. He knew that he was neither a deep +thinker nor a finished preacher, and was content +to be what he was, so long as he could perform +the work which it was in him to do. He lost +no opportunity of meeting the working men, +would go and talk to them in the yards of the +mills or at the evening gatherings of mechanics’ +institutes; and when any misfortune befell, such +as a colliery accident, he was often among the +first who reached the spot to help the survivors +and comfort the widows. He made no difference +between rich and poor, showed no wish to be a +guest in the houses of the great, and treated the +poorest curate with as much courtesy as the most +pompous county magnate. His work in Lancashire +seldom allowed him to appear in the House +of Lords; and this he regretted, not that he +desired to speak there, but because, as he said, +“Whether or not bishops do Parliament good, +Parliament does bishops good.”</p> +<p>Such a simple, earnest, active course of conduct +told upon the feelings of the people who read of +his words and doings. But even greater was the +impression made by his personality upon those +who saw him. He was a tall, well-built man,<a name='FNanchor_0026' id='FNanchor_0026'></a><a href='#Footnote_0026' class='fnanchor'>[31]</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_204' name='page_204'></a>204</span> +erect in figure, with a quick eye, a firm step, a +ruddy face, an expression of singular heartiness +and geniality. He seemed always cheerful, and, +in spite of his endless labours, always fresh and +strong. His smile and the grasp of his hand +put you into good-humour with yourself and the +world; if you were dispirited, they led you out +of shadow into sunlight. He was not a great +reader, and had no time for sustained and searching +thought; yet he seemed always abreast of +what was passing in the world, and to know what +the books and articles and speeches of the day +contained, although he could not have found time +to peruse them. With strong opinions of his own, +he was anxious to hear yours; a ready and eager +talker, yet a willing listener. His oratory was +plain, with few flights of rhetoric, but it was direct +and vigorous, free from conventional phrases, +charged with clear good sense and genuine feeling, +and capable, when his feeling was exceptionally +strong, of rising to eloquence. He had a +ready sense of humour, the best proof of which +was that he relished a joke against himself.<a name='FNanchor_0027' id='FNanchor_0027'></a><a href='#Footnote_0027' class='fnanchor'>[32]</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_205' name='page_205'></a>205</span> +However, the greatest charm, both of his public +and private talk, was the transparent sincerity +and honesty that shone through it. His mind +was like a crystal pool of water in a mountain +stream. You saw everything that was in it, and +saw nothing that was mean or unworthy. This +sincerity and freshness made his character not +only manly, but lovable and beautiful, beautiful +in its tenderness, its loyalty to his friends, its +devotion to truth.</p> +<p>His conscientious anxiety to say nothing more +than he thought was apt to make him an embarrassing +ally. It happened more than once +that when he came to speak at a public meeting +on behalf of some enterprise, he was not content, +like most men, to set forth its merits and claims, +but went on to dwell upon possible drawbacks +or dangers, so that the more ardent friends of +the scheme thought he was pouring cold water +on them, and called him a Balaam reversed. In +a political assembly he would have been an <i>enfant +terrible</i> whom his party would have feared to put +up to speak; but as people in the diocese got to +know that this was his way, they only smiled at +his too ingenuous honesty. As he spoke with no +preparation, and was naturally impulsive, he now +and then spoke unadvisedly, and received a good +deal of newspaper censure. But he was never +involved in real trouble by these speeches. As +Dean Stanley wrote to him, “You have a singular +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_206' name='page_206'></a>206</span> +gift of going to the very verge of imprudence and +yet never crossing it.”</p> +<p>No one will wonder that such a character, set +in a conspicuous place, and joined to extraordinary +activity and zeal, should have produced an immense +effect on the people of his city and diocese. +Since Nonconformity arose in England in the +seventeenth century, no bishop, perhaps, indeed +no man, whether cleric or layman, had done so +much to draw together people of different religious +persuasions and help them to realise their common +Christianity. Densely populated South Lancashire +is practically one huge town, and he was its +foremost citizen; the most instant in all good +works; the one whose words were most sure to +find attentive listeners. This was because he +spoke, I will not say as a layman, but simply +as a Christian, never claiming for himself any +special authority in respect either of his sacerdotal +character or his official position. No English +prelate before him had been so welcome to all +classes and sections; none was so much lamented +by the masses of the people. But it is a significant +fact that he was from first to last more +popular with the laity than with the clergy. Not +that there was ever any slur on his orthodoxy. +He began life as a moderate High Churchman, +and gradually verged, half unconsciously, toward +what would be called a Broad-Church position; +maintaining the claim of the Anglican Church to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_207' name='page_207'></a>207</span> +undertake, and her duty to hold herself responsible +for, the education of the people, and upholding +her status as an establishment, but dwelling little +on minor points of doctrinal difference, and seeming +to care still less for external observances or +points of ritual. This displeased the Anglo-Catholic +party, and even among other sections of +the clergy there was a kind of feeling that the +Bishop was not sufficiently clerical, did not set full +store by the sacerdotal side of his office, and did +not think enough about ecclesiastical questions.</p> +<p>He was, I think, the first bishop who greeted +men of science as fellow-workers for truth, and +declared that Christianity had not, and could not +have, anything to fear from scientific inquiry. +This has often been said since, but in 1870 it was +so novel that it drew from Huxley a singularly +warm and impressive recognition. He was one +of the first bishops to condemn the system of +theological tests in the English universities. He +even declared that “it was an evil hour when +the Church thought herself obliged to add to or +develop the simple articles of the Apostles’ Creed.” +These deliverances, which any one can praise +now, alarmed a large section of the Church of +England then; nor was the bishop’s friendliness +to Dissenters favourably regarded by those who +deny to Dissenting pastors the title of Christian +ministers.<a name='FNanchor_0028' id='FNanchor_0028'></a><a href='#Footnote_0028' class='fnanchor'>[33]</a></p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_208' name='page_208'></a>208</span></div> +<p>The gravest trouble of his life arose in connection +with legal proceedings which he felt bound +to take in the case of a Ritualist clergyman +who had persisted in practices apparently illegal. +Fraser, though personally the most tolerant of +men to those who differed from his own theological +views, felt bound to enforce the law, because +it was the law, and was at once assailed unjustly, +as well as bitterly, by those who sympathised with +the offending clergyman, and who could not, or +would not, understand that a bishop, like other +persons in an official position, may hold it his +absolute duty to carry out the directions of the +law whether or no he approves the law, and at +whatever cost to himself. These attacks were +borne with patience and dignity. He was never +betrayed into recriminations, and could the more +easily preserve his calmness, because he felt no +animosity.</p> +<p>A bishop may be a power outside his own +religious community even in a country where +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_209' name='page_209'></a>209</span> +the clergy are separated as a caste from the lay +people. Such men as Dupanloup in France show +that. So too he may be a mighty moral and +religious force outside his own religious community +in a country where there is no church +established or endowed by the State. The +example of Dr. Phillips Brooks in the United +States shows that. But Dupanloup would have +been eminent and influential had he not been a +clergyman at all; and Dr. Brooks was the most +inspiring preacher and the most potent leader of +religious thought in America long before, in +the last years of his life, he reluctantly consented +to accept the episcopal office. Fraser, not so +gifted by nature as either of those men, would +have had little chance of doing the work he did +save in a country where the existence of an +ancient establishment secures for one of its dignitaries +a position of far-reaching influence. When +the gains and losses to a nation of the retention +of a church establishment are reckoned up, this +may be set down among the gains.</p> +<p>If the Church of England possessed more +leaders like Tait, Fraser, and Lightfoot—the +statesman, the citizen, and the scholar—in the +characters and careers of all of whom one finds +the common mark of a catholic and pacific spirit, +she would have no need to fear any assaults of +political foes, no temptation to ally herself with +any party, but might stand as an establishment +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_210' name='page_210'></a>210</span> +until, after long years, by the general wish of her +own people, as well as of those who are without, +she passed peaceably into the position of being +the first in honour, numbers, and influence among +a group of Christian communities, all equally free +from State control.</p> +<p>Fraser’s example showed how much an attitude +of unpretending simplicity and friendliness to all +sects and classes may do to mitigate the jealousy +and suspicion which still embitter the relations of +the different religious bodies in England, and +which work for evil even in its politics. He +created, as Dean Stanley said, a new type of +episcopal excellence: and why should not originality +be shown in the conception and discharge of +an office as well as in the sphere of pure thought +or of literary creation?</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_211' name='page_211'></a>211</span> +<a name='SIR_STAFFORD_HENRY_NORTHCOTE_EARL_OF_IDDESLEIGH34' id='SIR_STAFFORD_HENRY_NORTHCOTE_EARL_OF_IDDESLEIGH34'></a> +<h2>SIR STAFFORD HENRY NORTHCOTE, EARL OF IDDESLEIGH<a name="FNanchor_34" id="FNanchor_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor2">[34]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>Sir Stafford Northcote (born 1818, died 1887) +belonged to a type of politician less common +among us than it used to be, and likely to +become still more rare as England grows more +democratic—the county gentleman of old family +and good estate, who receives and profits by a +classical education at one of the ancient universities, +who is at an early age returned to +Parliament in respect of his social position in +his county, who has leisure to cultivate himself +for statesmanship, who has tastes and +resources outside the sphere of politics. Devonshire, +whence he came, has preserved more +of the old features of English country life +than the central and northern parts of England, +where manufactures and the growth of population +have swept away the venerable remains of +feudalism. In Devonshire the old families are +still deeply respected by the people. They are +so intermarried that most of them have ties of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_212' name='page_212'></a>212</span> +kinship with all their neighbours. Few rich +parvenus have intruded among them; society is +therefore exceptionally easy, simple, and unostentatious. +There is still a strong local patriotism, +which makes every Devonshire man, whatever +his political prepossessions, proud of other Devonshire +men who rise to eminence, and which +exerts a wholesome influence on the tone of +manners and social intercourse. Northcote was a +thorough Devonshire man, who loved his county +and knew its dialect: his Devonshire stories, +told with the strong accent he could assume, +were the delight of any company that could +tempt him to repeat them. He was immensely +popular in the county, and had well earned his +popularity by his pleasant neighbourly ways, as +well as by his attention to county business and +to the duties of a landowner.</p> +<p>He had the time-honoured training of the +good old English type, was a schoolboy at +Eton, went thence to Oxford, won the highest +distinctions as a scholar, and laid the foundations +of a remarkably wide knowledge of modern +as well as ancient literature. He served his +apprenticeship to statesmanship as private secretary +to Mr. Gladstone, who was then (1843) +a member of Sir Robert Peel’s Government. +When the great schism in the Tory party took +place over the question of free trade in corn, he +was not yet in Parliament, and therefore was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_213' name='page_213'></a>213</span> +not driven to choose between Peel and the +Protectionists. In 1855, when he first entered +the House of Commons, that question was settled +and gone, so there was no inconsistency in his +entering the Tory ranks although himself a +decided Free Trader. He was not a man who +would have elbowed his way upward. But elbows +were not needed. His abilities, as well as his +industry and the confidence he inspired, speedily +brought him to the top. He was appointed +Secretary to the Treasury in 1859, entered the +Cabinet in 1866, when a new Tory Ministry +was formed under Lord Derby; and when in +1876 Mr. Disraeli retired to the House of Lords, +he became, being then Chancellor of the Exchequer, +leader of the majority in the House +of Commons, while Mr. Gathorne Hardy, the +only other person who had been thought of +as suitable for that post, received a peerage. +Mr. Hardy was a more forcible and rousing +speaker, but Northcote had more varied accomplishments +and a fuller mastery of official work. +Disraeli said that he had “the largest parliamentary +knowledge of any man he had met.”</p> +<p>As an administrator, Sir Stafford Northcote +was diligent, judicious, and free from any taint +of jobbery. He sought nothing for himself; +did not abuse his patronage; kept the public +interests steadily before his mind. He was considerate +to his subordinates, and gracious to all +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_214' name='page_214'></a>214</span> +men. He never grudged labour, although there +might be no prospect of winning credit by it. +Scrupulous in discharging his duties to his +party, he overtaxed his strength by speaking +constantly at public meetings in the country, a +kind of work he must have disliked, and for +which he was ill fitted by the moderation of his +views and of his language. Parliament is not a +good place for the pursuit of pure truth, but the +platform is still less favourable to that quest. It +was remarked of him that even in party gatherings, +where invective against political opponents +is apt to be expected and relished, he argued +fairly, and never condescended to abuse.</p> +<p>As a Parliamentarian he had two eminent +merits—immense knowledge and admirable +readiness. He had been all his life a keen +observer and a diligent student; and as his +memory was retentive, all that he had observed +or read stood at his command. In +questions of trade and finance, questions which, +owing, perhaps, to their increasing intricacy, +seem to be less and less frequently mastered +by practical politicians in England, he was +especially strong. No other man on his own +side in politics spoke on such matters with equal +authority, and the brunt of the battle fell on +him whenever they came up for discussion. +As he had now his old master for his chief +antagonist, the conflict was no easy one; but he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_215' name='page_215'></a>215</span> +never shrank from it. Not less remarkable was +his alertness in debate. His manner was indeed +somewhat ineffective, for it wanted both force +and variety. Sentence followed sentence in a +smooth and easy stream, always clear, always +grammatically correct, but with a flow too equably +unbroken. There were few impressive phrases, +few brilliant figures, few of those appeals to +passion with which it is necessary to warm and +rouse a large assembly. When the House grew +excited at the close of a long full-dress debate, +and Sir Stafford rose in the small hours of the +morning to wind it up on behalf of his party, men +felt that the ripple of his sweet voice, the softness +of his gentle manner, were not what the occasion +called for. But what he said was always to the +point and well worth hearing. No facts or +arguments suddenly thrown at him by opponents +disconcerted him; for there was sure to +be an answer ready. However weak his own +case might seem, his ingenuity could be relied +upon to strengthen it; however powerfully the +hostile case had been presented, he found weak +places in it and shook it down by a succession +of well-planted criticisms, each apparently small, +but damaging when taken all together, because +no one of them could be dismissed as irrelevant.</p> +<p>It was interesting to watch him as he sat on +the front bench, with his hat set so low on his brow +that it hid all the upper part of his face, while the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_216' name='page_216'></a>216</span> +lower part was covered by a thick yellowish-brown +beard, perfectly motionless, rarely taking a note +of what was said, and, to all appearance, the most +indifferent figure in the House. The only sign +of feeling which he gave was to be found in +his habit of thrusting each of his hands up the +opposite sleeve of his coat when Mr. Gladstone, +the only assailant whom he needed to fear, burst +upon him in a hailstorm of declamation. But +when he rose, one perceived that nothing had +escaped him. Every point which an antagonist +had made was taken up and dealt with; no point +that could aid his own contention was neglected; +and the fluent grace with which his discourse +swept along, seldom aided by a reference to +notes, was not more surprising than the unfailing +skill with which he shunned dangerous ground, +and put his propositions in a form which made +it difficult to contradict them. I remember to +have heard a member of the opposite party +remark, that nothing was more difficult than to +defend your argument from Northcote, because +he had the art of nibbling it away, admitting +a little in order to evade or overthrow the rest.</p> +<p>So much for his parliamentary aptitudes, which +were fully recognised before he rose to leadership. +But as it was his leadership that has given him a +place in history, I may dwell for a little upon the +way in which he filled that most trying as well +as most honourable post. He led the House—that +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_217' name='page_217'></a>217</span> +is to say, the Ministerial majority—for four +sessions (1877-1880), and the Tory Opposition for +five and a half sessions (1880 to middle of 1885). +To lead the House of Commons a man must have, +over and above the qualities which make a good +debater, an unusual combination of talents. He +must be both bold and cautious, combative and +cool. He must take, on his own responsibility, +and on the spur of the moment, decisions which +commit the whole Ministry, and yet, especially if +he be not Prime Minister, he must consider how +far his colleagues will approve and implement his +action. He must put enough force and fire +into his speeches to rouse his own ranks and +intimidate (if he can) his opponents, yet must +have regard to the more timorous spirits among +his own supporters, going no further than he +feels they will follow, and must sometimes throw +a crafty fly over those in the Opposition whom +he thinks wavering or disaffected. Under the +fire of debate, perhaps while composing the +speech he has to make in reply, he must +consider not merely the audience before him +but also the effect his words will have when +they are read next morning in cold blood, +and, it may be, the effect not only in England +but abroad. Being responsible for the whole +conduct of parliamentary business, he must keep +a close watch upon every pending bill, and determine +how much of Government time shall be +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_218' name='page_218'></a>218</span> +allotted to each, and in what order they shall be +taken, and how far the general feeling of the +House will let him go in seizing the hours usually +reserved for private members, and in granting or +refusing <a name='TC_1' id='TC_1'></a><ins class="trchange" title="Was 'opportunies'">opportunities</ins> for discussing topics he would +prefer to have not discussed at all.</p> +<p>So far as prudence, tact, and knowledge of +business could enable him to discharge these +duties, Northcote discharged them admirably. +It was his good fortune to have behind him in +Lord Beaconsfield, who had recently gone to the +House of Lords, a chief of the whole party who +trusted him, and with whom he was on the best +terms. The immense authority of that chief +secured his own authority. His party was—as +the Tory party usually is—compact and loyal; +and his majority ample, so he had no reason +to fear defeat. In the conflicts that arose +over Eastern affairs in 1877-79, affairs at some +moments highly critical, he was cautious and +adroit, more cautious than Lord Beaconsfield, +sometimes repairing by moderate language the +harm which the latter’s theatrical utterances +had done. When a group of Irish Nationalist +members, among whom Mr. Parnell soon came +to the front, began to evade the rules and +paralyse the action of the House by obstructive +tactics, he was less successful. Their +ingenuity baffled the Ministry, and brought the +House into sore straits. But it may be doubted +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_219' name='page_219'></a>219</span> +whether any leader could have overcome the +difficulties of the position. It was a new +position. The old rules framed under quite +different conditions were not fit to check members +who, far from regarding the sentiments of +the House, avowed their purpose to reduce it to +impotence, and thereby obtain that Parliament +of their own, which could alone, as they held, +cure the ills of Ireland.</p> +<p>After ten years of struggle and experiment, +drastic remedies for obstruction were at last +devised; but in the then state of opinion within +the House, those remedies could not have been +carried. Members accustomed to the old state of +things could not for a good while make up their +minds to sacrifice part of their own privileges in +order to deal with a difficulty the source of which +they would not attempt to cure. On the whole, +therefore, though he was blamed at the time, +Northcote may be deemed to have passed creditably +through his first period of leadership.</p> +<p>It was when he had to lead his party in +Opposition, after April 1880, that his severest +trial came. To lead the minority is usually easier +than to lead the majority. A leader of the +Opposition also must, no doubt, take swift decisions +in the midst of a debate, must consider +how far he is pledging his party to a policy +which they may be required to maintain when +next they come into power, must endeavour to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_220' name='page_220'></a>220</span> +judge, often on scanty data, how many of his usual +or nominal supporters will follow him into the +lobby when a division is called, and how best he +can draw off some votes from among his opponents. +Still, delicate as this work is, it is not so hard as +that of the leader of the Government, for it is +rather critical than constructive, and a mistake +can seldom do irreparable mischief. Northcote, +however, had special difficulties to face. Mr. +Gladstone, still full of energy and fire, was +leading the majority. After a few months +Lord Beaconsfield’s mantle no longer covered +Northcote (that redoubtable strategist died +in April 1881), and a small but active group +of Tory members set up an irregular skirmishing +Opposition on their own account, paying +little heed to his moderate counsels. The Tory +party was then furious at its unexpected defeat +at the election of 1880. It was full of fight, burning +for revenge, eager to denounce every trifling +error of the Ministry, and to give battle on small +as well as great occasions. Hence it resented +the calm and cautiously critical attitude which +Northcote took up. He had plenty of courage; +but he thought, as indeed most impartial observers +thought, that little was to be gained +by incessantly worrying an enemy so superior +in force and flushed with victory; that premature +assaults might consolidate a majority within +which there existed elements of discord; and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_221' name='page_221'></a>221</span> +that it was wiser to wait till the Ministry should +begin to make mistakes and incur misfortunes in +the natural course of events, before resuming the +offensive against them. There is a natural tendency +to reaction in English popular opinion, and +a tendency to murmur against whichever party +may be in power. This tendency must soon +have told in favour of the Tories, with little +effort on their own part; and when it was already +manifest, a Parliamentary attack could have been +delivered with effect. Northcote’s view and plan +were probably right, but, being too prone to yield +to pressure, and finding his hand forced, he +allowed himself to be drawn by the clamour of +his followers into aggressive operations, which, +nevertheless, himself not quite approving them, +he conducted in a half-hearted way. He had +not Mr. Gladstone’s power of doing excellently +what he hated to have to do. And it must be +admitted that from 1882 onwards, when troubles +in Ireland and oscillations in Egyptian policy +had begun to shake the credit of the Liberal +Ministry, he showed less fire and pugnacity than +the needs of the time required from a party +leader. In one thing the young men, who, +like Zulu warriors, wished to wash their spears, +were right and he was wrong. He conceived +that frequent attacks and a resort to obstructive +tactics would damage the Opposition in the eyes +of the country. Experience has shown that +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_222' name='page_222'></a>222</span> +parties do not greatly suffer from the way they +fight their Parliamentary battles. Few people +follow the proceedings closely enough to know +when an Opposition deserves blame for prolonging +debate, or a Ministry for abuse of the closure. +So, too, in the United States it would seem that +neither the tyrannical action of a majority nor +filibustering by a minority shocks the nation.</p> +<p>Not only was Northcote’s own temper pacific, +but he was too sweetly reasonable and too dispassionate +to be a successful leader in Opposition. +He felt that he was never quite a +party man. His mind was almost too judicial, +his courtesy too unfailing, his temper too unruffled, +his manner too unassuming. He did not +inspire awe or fear. Not only did he never +seek to give pain, even where pain might have +been a wholesome discipline for pushing selfishness—he +seemed incapable of irritation, and +bore with vexatious obstruction from some +members of the House, and mutinous attacks +from others who belonged to his own party, +when a spirit less kindly and forgiving might have +better secured his own authority and the dignity +of the assembly. He proceeded on the assumption, +an unsafe one, as he had too much reason +to know, that every one else was a gentleman +like himself, penetrated by the old traditions of +the House of Commons.</p> +<p>While superior to the prejudices of the old-fashioned +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_223' name='page_223'></a>223</span> +wing of his party, he was too cautious +and conscientious to join those who sought to +lead it into demagogic courses. So far as +political opinions went, he might, had fortune +sent him into the world as the son of a Whig +family, have made an excellent Whig, removed +as far from high Toryism on the one hand as +from Radicalism on the other. There was, therefore, +a certain incompatibility between the man +and the position. Average partisans felt that a +leader so very reasonable was not in full sympathy +with them. Even his invincible optimism +displeased them. “Hang that fellow Northcote!” +said one of them; “he’s always seeing blue sky.” +The militant partisans, whatever their opinions, +desired a pugnacious chief. That a leader +should draw the enemy’s fire does him good with +his followers, and makes them rally to him. But +the fire of his opponents was hardly ever directed +against Northcote, even when controversy was +hottest. Had he possessed a more imperious +will, he might have overcome these difficulties, +because his abilities and experience were of +the highest value to his party, and his character +stood so high that the mass of sensible +Tories all over the country might perhaps have +rallied to him, if he had appealed to them +against the intrigues by which it was sought to +supplant him. He did not lack courage. But +he lacked what men call “backbone.” For +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_224' name='page_224'></a>224</span> +practical success, it is less fatal to fail in wisdom +than to fail in resolution. He had not that unquenchable +self-confidence which I have sought +to describe in Disraeli, and shall have to describe +in Parnell and in Gladstone. He yielded to pressure, +and people came to know that he would +yield to pressure.</p> +<p>The end of it was that the weakened prestige +and final fall of the Liberal Ministry were not +credited to his generalship, but rather to those +who had skirmished in advance of the main army. +That fall was in reality due neither to him nor to +them, but partly to the errors or internal divisions +of the Ministry itself, partly to causes such as the +condition of Ireland and the revolt of Arabi in +Egypt, for which Mr. Gladstone’s Cabinet was +no more, perhaps less, to blame than many of +its predecessors. No Ministry of recent years +seemed, when it was formed, to have such a +source of strength in the abilities of the men who +composed it as did the Ministry of 1880. None +proved so persistently unlucky.</p> +<p>The circumstances under which Northcote’s +leadership came to an end by his elevation to the +Upper House (June 1885) as Earl of Iddesleigh, +as well as those under which he was subsequently +(1887) removed from the post of Foreign Secretary +in the then Tory Ministry, evoked much +comment at the time, but some of the incidents +attending them have not yet been disclosed, and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_225' name='page_225'></a>225</span> +they could not be discussed without bringing in +other persons with whom I am not here concerned. +Conscious of his own loyalty to his party, and +remembering his long and laborious services, he +felt those circumstances deeply; and they may have +hastened his death, which came very suddenly in +February 1887, and called forth a burst of sympathy +such as had not been seen since Peel perished by +an accident nearly forty years before.</p> +<p>In private life Northcote had the charm of +unpretending manners, coupled with abundant +humour, a store of anecdote, and a geniality +which came straight from the heart. No man +was a more agreeable companion. In 1884, +when the University of Edinburgh celebrated +its tercentenary, he happened to be Lord Rector, +and in that capacity had to preside over the +festivities. Although a stranger to Scotland, +and as far removed (for he was a decided +High Churchman) from sympathy with Scottish +Presbyterianism as he was removed in politics +from the Liberalism then dominant in Edinburgh, +he won golden opinions from the Scotch, +as well as from the crowd of foreign visitors, by +the tact and grace he showed in the discharge of +his duties, and the skill with which, putting off +the politician, he entered into the spirit of the +occasion as a lover of letters and learning. +Though political eminence had secured his election +to the office, every one felt that it would have been +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_226' name='page_226'></a>226</span> +hard to find in the ranks of literature and science +any one fitter to preside over such a gathering.</p> +<p>He left behind few in whom the capacities +of the administrator were so happily blended with +a philosophic judgment and a wide culture. It is +a combination which was inadequately appreciated +in his own person. Vehemence in controversy, +domineering audacity of purpose, the power of +moving crowds by incisive harangues, were the +qualities which the younger generation seemed +disposed to cultivate. They are qualities apt to be +valued in times of strife and change, times when +men are less concerned to study and apply principles +than to rouse the passions and consolidate +the organisation of their party, while dazzling the +nation by large promises or bold strokes of policy. +For such courses Northcote was not the man. +Were it to be observed of him that he was too +good for the work he had to do, it might be +answered that political leadership is work for +which no man can be too good, and that it was +rather because his force of will and his combativeness +were not commensurate with his other gifts, +that those other gifts did not have their full effect +and win their due success. Yet this at least may +be said, that if he had been less amiable, less fair-minded, +and less open-minded, he would have +retained his leadership to the end.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_227' name='page_227'></a>227</span> +<a name='CHARLES_STEWART_PARNELL' id='CHARLES_STEWART_PARNELL'></a> +<h2>CHARLES STEWART PARNELL</h2> +</div> +<p>Though I do not propose to write even the briefest +narrative of Parnell’s life, but only to note certain +salient features of his intellect and character, it +may be well to state a few facts and dates; for in +these days of rapid change and hasty reading, +facts soon pass out of most men’s memories, +leaving only vague impressions behind.<a name='FNanchor_0029' id='FNanchor_0029'></a><a href='#Footnote_0029' class='fnanchor'>[35]</a></p> +<p>He belonged to a family which, established at +Congleton in Cheshire, had at the time of the +Restoration migrated to Ireland, had settled on +an estate in Wicklow, and had produced in every +subsequent generation a person of distinction. +Thomas Parnell, the friend of Pope and Swift, +is still remembered by his poem of <i>The Hermit</i>. +Another Parnell (Sir John) was Chancellor of +the Irish Exchequer in the days of Henry +Grattan, whose opinions he shared. Another +(Sir Henry) was a leading Irish Liberal member +of the House of Commons, and died by his +own hand in 1842. Charles’s father and grandfather +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_228' name='page_228'></a>228</span> +figured less in the public eye. But +his mother was a remarkable woman, and +the daughter of a remarkable man, Commodore +Charles Stewart, one of the most brilliant naval +commanders on the American side in the war of +1812. Stewart was the son of a Scoto-Irishman +from Ulster, who had emigrated to America in +the middle of the eighteenth century; so there +was a strain of Scottish as well as a fuller strain +of English blood in the most powerful Irish +leader of recent times.</p> +<p>Parnell was born at Avondale, the family estate +in Wicklow, in 1846, and was educated mostly at +private schools in England. He spent some +months at Magdalene College, Cambridge, but, +having been rusticated for an affray in the street, +refused to return to the College, and finished his +education for himself at home. It was a very imperfect +education. He cared nothing for study, +and indeed showed interest only in mathematics +and cricket. In 1874 he stood as a candidate for +Parliament, but without success. When he had to +make a speech he broke down utterly. In 1875 he +was returned as member for the county of Meath, +and within two years had made his mark in the +House of Commons. In 1880 he was elected leader +of the Irish Parliamentary party, and ruled it and +his followers in Ireland with a rod of iron until +he was deposed, in 1890, at the instance of +the leaders of the English Liberal party, who +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_229' name='page_229'></a>229</span> +thought that the verdict against him in a divorce +suit in which he was co-respondent had fatally +discredited him in the eyes of the bulk of the +English Liberal party, and made co-operation +with him impossible. Refusing to resign his +leadership, he conducted a campaign in Ireland +against the majority of his former followers with +extraordinary energy till November 1891, when +he died of rheumatic fever after a short illness. +A constitution which had never been strong was +worn out by the ceaseless exertions and mental +tension of the last twelve months.</p> +<p>The whole of his political activity was comprised +within a period of sixteen years, during +ten of which he led the Irish Nationalist party, +exercising an authority more absolute than any +Irish leader had exercised before.</p> +<p>It has often been observed that he was not +Irish, and that he led the Irish people with success +just because he did not share their characteristic +weaknesses. But it is equally true that he was +not English. One always felt the difference +between his temperament and that of the normal +Englishman. The same remark applies to some +other famous Irish leaders. Wolfe Tone, for +instance, and Fitzgibbon (afterwards Lord Clare) +were unlike the usual type of Irishman—that is, +the Irishman in whom the Celtic element predominates; +but they were also unlike Englishmen. +The Anglo-Irish Protestants, a strong race +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_230' name='page_230'></a>230</span> +who have produced a number of remarkable men +in excess of the proportion they bear to the +whole population of the United Kingdom, fall +into two classes—the men of North-Eastern +Ulster, in whom there is so large an infusion +of Scottish blood that they may almost be called +“Scotchmen with a difference,” and the men +of Leinster and Munster, who are true Anglo-Celts. +It was to this latter class that Parnell +belonged. They are a group by themselves, in +whom some of the fire and impulsiveness of the +Celt has been blended with some of the firmness, +the tenacity, and the close hold upon facts which +belong to the Englishman. Mr. Parnell, however, +though he might be reckoned to the Anglo-Irish +type, was not a normal specimen of it. He +was a man whom you could not refer to any +category, peculiar both in his intellect and in his +character generally.</p> +<p>His intellect was eminently practical. He +did not love speculation or the pursuit of +abstract truth, nor had he a taste for literature, +still less a delight in learning for its own sake. +Even of the annals of Ireland his knowledge +was most slender. He had no grasp of constitutional +questions, and was not able to give any +help in the construction of a Home Rule scheme +in 1886. His general reading had been scanty, +and his speeches show no acquaintance either +with history, beyond the commonest facts, or with +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_231' name='page_231'></a>231</span> +any other subject connected with politics. Very +rarely did they contain a maxim or reflection of +general applicability, apart from the particular +topic he was discussing. Nor did he ever +attempt to give to them the charm of literary +ornament. All was dry, direct, and practical, +without so much as a graceful phrase or a +choice epithet. Sometimes, when addressing a +great public meeting, he would seek to rouse the +audience by vehement language; but though there +might be a glow of suppressed passion, there were +no flashes of imaginative light. Yet he never +gave the impression of an uneducated man. +His language, though it lacked distinction, was +clear and grammatical. His taste was correct. +It was merely that he did not care for any of +those things which men of ability comparable to +his usually do care for. His only interests, outside +politics, lay in mechanics and engineering +and in the development of the material resources +of his country. He took pains to manage his +estate well, and was specially anxious to make +something out of his stone quarries, and to learn +what could be done in the way of finding and +working minerals.</p> +<p>Those who observed that he was almost +always occupied in examining and attacking the +measures or the conduct of those who governed +Ireland were apt to think his talent a purely +critical one. They were mistaken. Critical, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_232' name='page_232'></a>232</span> +indeed, it was, in a remarkable degree; keen, +penetrating, stringently dissective of the arguments +of an opponent, ingenious in taking advantage of +a false step in administration or of an admission +imprudently made in debate. But it had also a +positive and constructive quality. From time to +time he would drop his negative attitude and +sketch out plans of legislation which were always +consistent and weighty, though not made attractive +by any touch of imagination. They were the +schemes not so much of a statesman as of an able +man of business, who saw the facts, especially +the financial facts, in a sharp, cold light, and +they seldom went beyond what the facts could be +made to prove. And his ideas struck one as +being not only forcible but independent, the fruit +of his own musings. Although he freely used +the help of others in collecting facts or opinions, +he did not seem to be borrowing the ideas, +but rather to have looked at things for himself, +and seen them as they actually were, in +their true perspective, not (like many Irishmen) +through the mists of sentiment or party feeling. +The impression made by one of his more elaborate +speeches might be compared to that which +one receives from a grey sunless day with an east +wind, a day in which everything shows clear, but +also hard and cold.</p> +<p>To call his mind a narrow one, as people sometimes +did, was to wrong it. If the range of his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_233' name='page_233'></a>233</span> +interests was limited, his intelligence was not. +Equal to any task it undertook, it judged soundly, +appreciating the whole phenomena of the case, +men and things that had no sort of attraction +for it. There was less pleasure in watching its +activities than the observation of a superior +mind generally affords, for it was always directed +to immediate aims, and it wanted the originality +which is fertile in ideas and analogies. It +was not discursive, not versatile, not apt to +generalise. It did not rejoice in the exercise of +thought for thought’s sake, but felt itself to be +merely a useful instrument for performing the +definite practical work which the will required +of it.</p> +<p>If, however, the intellect of the man could +not be called interesting, his character had at +least this interest, that it gave one many +problems to solve, and could not easily be +covered by any formulæ. An observer who +followed the old method of explaining every +man by ascribing to him a single ruling passion, +would have said that his ruling passion was +pride. The pride was so strong that it +almost extinguished vanity. Parnell did not +appear to seek occasions for display, frequently +neglecting those which other men would have +chosen, seldom seeming to be elated by the +applause of crowds, and treating the House of +Commons with equal coolness whether it cheered +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_234' name='page_234'></a>234</span> +him or howled at him. He cared nothing for +any social compliments or attentions, rarely +accepted an invitation to dinner, dressed with +little care and often in clothes whose style and +colour seemed unworthy of his position. He +was believed to be haughty and distant to his +followers; and although he could occasionally +be kindly and even genial, scarcely any were +admitted to intimacy, and few of the ordinary +signs of familiarity could be observed between +him and them. Towards other persons he was +sufficiently polite but warily reserved, showing +no desire for the cultivation of friendship, +or, indeed, for any relations but those +of business. Of some ordinary social duties, +such as opening and answering letters, he was, +especially in later years, more neglectful than +good breeding permits; and men doubted +whether to ascribe this fault to indolence or to +a superb disregard of everybody but himself. +Such disregard he often showed in greater +matters, taking no notice of attacks made +upon him which he might have refuted, and +intimating to the English his indifference to +their praise or blame. On one remarkable +occasion, at the beginning of the session of +1883, he was denounced by Mr. W. E. Forster +in a long and bitter speech, which told powerfully +upon the House. Many instances were +given in which Irish members had palliated +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_235' name='page_235'></a>235</span> +or failed to condemn criminal acts, and Parnell +was arraigned as the head and front of this line +of conduct, and thus virtually responsible for the +outrages that had occurred. The Irish leader, +who had listened in impassive silence, broken +only by one interjected contradiction, to this +fierce invective, did not rise to reply, and was +with difficulty induced by his followers to deliver +his defence on the following day. To the +astonishment of every one, that defence consisted +in a declaration, delivered in a cold, +careless, almost scornful way, that for all he +said or did in Ireland he held himself responsible +to his countrymen only, and did not in +the least regard what Englishmen thought of +him. It was an answer not of defence but of +defiance.</p> +<p>Even to his countrymen he could on occasion +be disdainful, expecting them to defer to his own +judgment of his own course. He would sometimes +remain away from Parliament for weeks +together, although important business might be +under consideration, perhaps would vanish altogether +from public ken. Yet this lordly attitude +and the air of mystery which surrounded him +did not seem to be studied with a view to effect. +They were due to his habit of thinking first +and chiefly of himself. If he desired to indulge +his inclinations, he indulged them. Some extremely +strong motive of passion or interest might +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_236' name='page_236'></a>236</span> +interpose to restrain this desire and stimulate +him to an unwelcome exertion; but no respect +for the opinion of others, nor fear of censure +from his allies or friends, would be allowed to +do so.</p> +<p>This boundless self-confidence and independence +greatly contributed to his success as a leader. +His faith in his star inspired a conviction that +obstacles whose reality his judgment recognised +would ultimately yield to his will, and gave him in +moments of crisis an undismayed fortitude which +only once forsook him—in the panic which was +suddenly created by the Phœnix Park murders of +May 1882. The confidence which he felt, or appeared +to feel, reacted upon his party, and became +a chief ground of their obedience to him and their +belief in his superior wisdom. His calmness, his +tenacity, his patience, his habit of listening quietly +to every one, but deciding for himself, were all +evidences of that resolute will which imposed +itself upon the Irish masses no less than upon +his Parliamentary following, and secured for him +a loyalty in which there was little or nothing of +personal affection.</p> +<p>In these several respects his overweening pride +was a source of strength. In another direction, +however, it proved a source of weakness. There +are men in whom the want of moral principle, +of noble emotions, or of a scrupulous conscience +and nice sense of honour, is partly replaced by +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_237' name='page_237'></a>237</span> +deference to the opinion of their class or of the +world. Such men may hold through life a +tolerably upright course, neither from the love +of virtue nor because they are ambitious and +anxious to stand well with those whom they +aspire to influence or rule, but because, having +a sense of personal dignity, combined with a +perception of what pleases or offends mankind, +they are resolved to do nothing whereby +their good name can be tarnished or an opening +given to malicious tongues. But when pride +towers to such a height as to become a law to +itself, disregarding the judgment of others, it +may not only lead its possessor into an attitude +of defiance which the world resents, but may +make him stoop to acts of turpitude which discredit +his character. Mr. Parnell was certainly +not a scrupulous man. Without dwelling upon +the circumstances attending the divorce case +already referred to, or upon his betrayal of Mr. +Gladstone’s confidences, and his reckless appeals +during the last year of his life to the most inflammable +elements in Ireland, there are facts +enough in his earlier career to show that he had +little regard for truth and little horror for crime. +A revolution may extenuate some sins, but even +in a revolution there are men (and sometimes +the strongest men) whose moral excellence shines +through the smoke of conflict and the mists of +detraction. In Mr. Parnell’s nature the moral +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_238' name='page_238'></a>238</span> +element was imperfectly developed. He seemed +cynical and callous; and it was probably his +haughty self-reliance which prevented him from +sufficiently deferring to the ordinary moralities +of mankind. His pride, which ought to have +kept him free from the suspicion of dishonour, +made him feel himself dispensed from the usual +restraints. Whatever he did was right in his +own eyes, and no other eyes need be regarded. +Phenomena somewhat similar were observable in +Napoleon. But Napoleon, though he came of a +good family, was obviously not a gentleman in +the common sense of the term. Mr. Parnell +was a gentleman in that sense. He had the +bearing, the manners, the natural easy dignity +of a man of birth who has always moved in +good society. He rarely permitted any one to +take liberties with him, even the innocent liberties +of familiar intercourse. This made his +departures from what may be called the inner +and higher standard of gentlemanly conduct all +the more remarkable.</p> +<p>He has been accused of a want of physical +courage. He did no doubt after the Phœnix +Park murders ask the authorities in England for +police protection, being, not unnaturally, in fear +for his life; and he habitually carried firearms. +He was at times in danger, and there was every +reason why he should be prepared to defend himself. +An anecdote was told of another member +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_239' name='page_239'></a>239</span> +of the House of Commons whose initials were the +same as his own, and who, taking what he supposed +to be his own overcoat from the peg on +which it hung in the cloakroom of the House, +was startled when he put his hand into the pocket +to feel in it the cold iron of a pistol. Moral +courage he showed in a high degree during +his whole public career, facing his antagonists +with an unshaken front, even when they were +most numerous and bitter. Though he intensely +disliked imprisonment, the terms on which he +came out of Kilmainham Gaol left no discredit +upon him. He behaved with perfect dignity +under the attacks of the press in 1887, and in +the face of the use made of letters attributed to +him which turned out to have been forged by +Richard Pigott—letters which the bulk of the +English upper classes had greedily swallowed. +With this courage and dignity there was, however, +little trace of magnanimity. He seldom said a +generous word, or showed himself responsive to +such a word spoken by another. Accustomed to +conceal his feelings, except in his most excited +moments, he rarely revealed, but he certainly +cherished, vindictive sentiments. He never forgave +either Mr. W. E. Forster or Mr. Gladstone +for having imprisoned him in 1881;<a name='FNanchor_0030' id='FNanchor_0030'></a><a href='#Footnote_0030' class='fnanchor'>[36]</a> and though +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_240' name='page_240'></a>240</span> +he stood in some awe of the latter, whom he +considered the only really formidable antagonist +he had ever had to confront, he bore a grudge +which smouldered under the reconciliation of 1886 +and leapt into flame in the manifesto of November +1890.</p> +<p>The union in Mr. Parnell of intense passion +with strenuous self-control struck all who watched +him closely, though it was seldom that passion +so far escaped as to make the contrast visibly +dramatic. Usually he was cold, grave, deliberate, +repelling advances with a sort of icy courtesy. +He hardly ever lost his temper in the House of +Commons, even in his last session under the +sarcasms of his former friends, though the low, +almost hissing tones of his voice sometimes +betrayed an internal struggle. But during the +electoral campaign in Kilkenny, in December +1890, when he was fighting for his life, he was +more than once so swept away by anger that +those beside him had to hold him back from +jumping off the platform into the crowd to strike +down some one who had interrupted him. Suspended +for a moment, his mastery of himself +quickly returned. Men were astonished to +observe how, after some of the stormy passages +at the meetings of Irish members held in one +of the House of Commons committee-rooms in +December 1890, he would address quietly, perhaps +lay his hand upon the shoulder of, some one +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_241' name='page_241'></a>241</span> +of the colleagues who had just been denouncing +him, and on whom he had poured all the vitriol +of his fierce tongue. As this could not have +been good-nature, it must have been either +calculated policy or a pride that would not +accept an injury from those whom he had been +wont to deem his subjects. Spontaneous kindliness +was never ascribed to him; nor had he, +so far as could be known, a single intimate +friend.</p> +<p>Oratory is the usual avenue to leadership in a +democratic movement, and Mr. Parnell is one of +the very few who have arrived at power neither +by that road nor by military success. So far +from having by nature any of the gifts or graces +of a popular speaker, he was at first conspicuously +deficient in them, and became at last effective +only by constant practice, and by an intellectual +force which asserted itself through commonplaceness +of language and a monotonous delivery. +Fluency was wanting, and even moderate ease +was acquired only after four or five years’ practice. +His voice was neither powerful nor delicate in its +modulations, but it was clear, and the enunciation +deliberate and distinct, quiet when the matter +was ordinary, slow and emphatic when an important +point arrived. With very little action of the +body, there was often an interesting and obviously +unstudied display of facial expression. So far from +glittering with the florid rhetoric supposed to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_242' name='page_242'></a>242</span> +characterise Irish eloquence, his speeches were +singularly plain, bare, and dry. Neither had +they any humour. If they ever raised a smile, +which seldom happened, it was by some touch of +sarcasm or adroit thrust at a point left unguarded +by an adversary. Their merit lay in their +lucidity, in their aptness to the matter in hand, +in the strong practical sense which ran through +them, coupled with the feeling that they came +from one who led a nation, and whose forecasts +had often fulfilled themselves. They were carefully +prepared, and usually made from pretty +full notes; but the preparation had been given +rather to the matter and the arrangement than to +the diction, which had rarely any ornament or +literary finish. Of late years he spoke infrequently, +whether from indolence or from weak +health, or because he thought little was to be +done in the face of a hostile majority, now that +the tactics of obstruction had been abandoned. +When he interposed without preparation in a +debate which had arisen unexpectedly, he was +short, pithy, and direct; indeed, nothing was +more characteristic of Parnell than his talent +for hitting the nail on the head, a talent which +always commands attention in deliberative assemblies. +No one saw more clearly or conveyed in +terser language the course which the circumstances +of the moment required; and as his mastery of +parliamentary procedure and practice came next +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_243' name='page_243'></a>243</span> +to that of Mr. Gladstone, any advice that he +gave to the House on a point of order carried +weight. It would indeed be no exaggeration to +say that during the sessions of 1889 and 1890 +he was distinctly the second man in the House +of Commons, surpassed in debating power by +five or six others, but inferior to Mr. Gladstone +alone in the interest which his speeches excited +and in the impression they produced. Along +with this access of influence his attitude and the +spirit of his policy appeared to rise and widen. +There was less of that hard attorneyism which +had marked his criticisms of the Tory Government +and their measures up to March 1880, and of the +Liberal Government and their measures during +the five following years. He seemed to grow +more and more to the full stature of a statesman, +with constructive views and a willingness to make +the best of the facts as he found them. Yet even +in this later and better time one note of greatness +was absent from his speeches. There was +nothing genial or generous or elevated about +them. They never soared into an atmosphere +of lofty feeling, worthy of the man who was by +this time deemed to be leading his nation to +victory, and who had begun to be admired and +honoured by one of the two great historic English +parties.</p> +<p>Parnell was not only versed in the rules of +parliamentary procedure, but also a consummate +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_244' name='page_244'></a>244</span> +master of parliamentary tactics. Soon after he +entered the House of Commons he detected its +weak point, and perfected a system of obstruction +which so destroyed the efficiency of its time-honoured +modes of doing business that new sets +of rules, each more stringent than the preceding, +had to be devised between 1878 and 1888. The +skill with which he handled his small but well-disciplined +battalion was admirable. He was +strict with individuals, requiring absolute obedience +to the party rules, but ready to gratify any +prevailing current of feeling when he saw that +this could be done without harm to the cause. +More than once, when English members who +happened to be acting with him on some particular +question pressed him to keep his men quiet and +let a division be taken at once, he answered that +they were doubtless right in thinking that the +moment for securing a good division had arrived, +but that he must not muzzle his followers when +they wanted to have their fling. The best +proof of the tact with which he ruled a section +comprising many men of brilliant talents lies +in the fact that there was no serious revolt, +or movement towards revolt, against him until +the breach of 1890 between himself and the +Liberal party had led to the belief that his continued +leadership would mean defeat at the polls +in Great Britain, and the postponement, perhaps +for many years, of Home Rule for Ireland.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_245' name='page_245'></a>245</span></div> +<p>Parnell’s political views and tendencies were +eagerly canvassed by those who had studied +him closely. Many, among both Englishmen +and Irishmen, held that he was at heart a Conservative, +valuing strong government and attached +to the rights of property. They predicted that +if an Irish Parliament had been established, as +proposed by Mr. Gladstone in 1886, and an +Irish cabinet formed to administer the affairs of +the island, Parnell would have been the inevitable +and somewhat despotic leader of the +party of authority and order. His co-operation +with the agrarian agitators from 1879 onwards +was in this view merely a politic expedient to +gain support for the Home Rule campaign. For +this theory there is much to be said. Though +he came to lead a revolution, and was willing, +as appeared in the last few months of his life, to +appeal to the genuine revolutionary party, Parnell +was not by temper or conviction a revolutionist. +Those who were left in Ireland of the old Fenian +group, and especially that section of the extreme +Fenians out of which the secret insurrectionary +and dynamitard societies were formed, never +liked or trusted him. The passion which originally +carried him into public life was hatred of +England, and a wish to restore to Ireland, if +possible her national independence (though he +rarely if ever avowed this), or at least her +own Parliament. But he was no democratic +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_246' name='page_246'></a>246</span> +leveller, and still less inclined to those socialistic +doctrines which the section influenced by Mr. +Davitt had espoused. He did not desire the +“extinction of landlordism,” and would probably +have been a restraining and moderating +force in an Irish legislature. That he was +genuinely attached to his native country need not +be doubted. But his patriotism had little of a +sentimental quality, and seemed to spring as +much from dislike of England as from love of +Ireland.</p> +<p>It may excite surprise that a man such as has +been sketched, with so cool a judgment and so +complete a self-control, a man (as his previous +career had shown) able to endure temporary +reverses in the confidence of ultimate success, +should have committed the fatal error, which +blasted his fame and shortened his life, of clinging +to the headship of his party when prudence +prescribed retirement. When he sought +the advice of Mr. Cecil Rhodes, retirement for +a time was the counsel he received. His +absence need not have been of long duration. +Had he, after the sentence of the Divorce +Court in November 1890, gone abroad for +eight or ten months, allowing some one to +be chosen in his place chairman of the Irish +party for the session, he might thereafter have +returned to the House of Commons, and would +doubtless, after a short lapse of time, have +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_247' name='page_247'></a>247</span> +naturally recovered the leadership. No one else +could have resisted his claims. Unfortunately, +the self-reliant pride which had many a time +stood him in good stead, made him refuse to +bow to the storm. Probably he could not +understand the indignation which the proceedings +in the divorce case had awakened in +England, being morally somewhat callous, and +knowing that his offence had been no secret to +many persons in the House of Commons. He +had been accustomed to despise English opinion, +and had on former occasions suffered little +for doing so. He bitterly resented both Mr. +Gladstone’s letter and the movement to depose +him which it roused in his own party. Having +often before found defiant resolution lead to +success, he determined again to rely on the +maxim which has beguiled so many to ruin, just +because it has so much truth in it—“<i>De l’audace, +encore de l’audace, toujours de l’audace.</i>” The +affront to his pride disturbed the balance of his +mind, and made him feel as if even a temporary +humiliation would destroy the prestige that had +been won by his haughty self-confidence. It +was soon evident that he had overestimated his +power in Ireland, but when the schism began +there were many besides Lord Salisbury—many +in Ireland as well as in England—who predicted +triumph for him. Nor must it be thought that +it was pure selfishness which made him resolve +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_248' name='page_248'></a>248</span> +rather to break with the English Liberals than +allow the Nationalist bark to be steered by any +hands but his own. He was a fatalist, and had +that confidence in his star and his mission which +is often characteristic of minds in which superstition—for +he was superstitious—and a certain +morbid taint may be discerned. There were +others who believed that no one but himself could +hold the Irish party together and carry the Irish +cause to triumph. No wonder that this belief +should have filled and perhaps disordered his +own brain.</p> +<p>The swiftness of his rise is a striking instance +of the power which intellectual concentration and a +strenuous will can exert, for he had no adventitious +help from wealth or family connection or from +the reputation of having suffered for his country. +<i>Ergo vivida vis animi pervicit.</i> When he entered +Parliament he was only thirty, with no experience +of affairs and no gift of speech; but the quality +that was in him of leading and ruling men, of +taking the initiative, of seeing and striking at the +weak point of the enemy, and fearlessly facing the +brunt of an enemy’s attack, made itself felt in a +few months, and he rose without effort to the first +place. With some intellectual limitations and +some great faults, he will stand high in the long +and melancholy series of Irish leaders: less +lofty than Grattan, less romantic than Wolfe +Tone, less attractive than O’Connell, less brilliant +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_249' name='page_249'></a>249</span> +than any of these three, yet entitled to be +remembered as one of the most remarkable +characters that his country has produced in her +struggle of many centuries against the larger +isle.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_250' name='page_250'></a>250</span> +<a name='CARDINAL_MANNING' id='CARDINAL_MANNING'></a> +<h2>CARDINAL MANNING</h2> +</div> +<p>Henry Edward Manning, Archbishop of Westminster +and Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church, +was born in 1808, eight years after Cardinal +Newman, and died in 1892. He was one of the +most notable figures of his generation; and, indeed, +in a sense, an unique figure, for he contributed +a new type to the already rich and +various ecclesiastical life of England. If he +could scarcely be described as intellectually a man +of the first order, he held a considerable place +in the history of his time, having effected what +greater men might perhaps have failed to effect, +for the race is not always to the swift, and time +and chance favoured Manning.</p> +<p>He was the son of wealthy parents, his father +a City of London merchant; was educated at +Harrow and at Oxford, where he obtained high +classical honours and a Fellowship at Merton +College; was ordained a clergyman, and soon rose +to be Archdeacon of Chichester; and, having by +degrees been led further and further from his +original Low Church position into the Tractarian +movement, ultimately, at the age of forty-three, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_251' name='page_251'></a>251</span> +went over to the Church of Rome. Having +some time before lost his wife, he was at once +re-ordained a priest, was appointed Archbishop +of Westminster on Cardinal Wiseman’s death in +1865, and raised to the Cardinalate by Pope +Pius IX. in 1875.</p> +<p>He was not a great thinker nor a man of +wide learning. His writings show no trace of +originality, nor indeed any conspicuous philosophical +acuteness or logical power. So far as +purely intellectual gifts are concerned, he was +not to be named with Cardinal Newman or with +several other of the ablest members of the +English Tractarian party, such as were the two +metaphysicians W. G. Ward and Dalgairns, both +of whom passed over to Rome, or such as was +Dean Church, an accomplished historian, and a +man of singularly beautiful character, who remained +an Anglican till his death in 1890. Nor, +though he had won a high reputation at his +University, was Manning a leading spirit in the +famous “Oxford Movement.” It was by his winning +manners, his graceful rhetoric, and his zealous +discharge of clerical duties, rather than by any +commanding talents that he rose to eminence in +the Church of England. Neither had his character +the same power either to attract or to awe as that +of Newman. Nobody in those days called him +great, as men called Newman. Nobody felt +compelled to follow where he led. There was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_252' name='page_252'></a>252</span> +not, either in his sermons or in his writings, or +in his bodily presence and conversation, anything +which could be pronounced majestic, or +lofty, or profound. In short, he was not in the +grand style, either as a man or as a preacher, and +wanted that note of ethereal purity or passionate +fervour which marks the two highest forms of +religious character.</p> +<p>Intelligent, however, skilful, versatile he was +in the highest degree; cultivated, too, with a +knowledge of all that a highly educated man +ought to know; dexterous rather than forcible +in theological controversy; an admirable rhetorician, +handling language with something of that +kind of art which Roman ecclesiastics most +cultivate, and in their possession of which the +leading Tractarians showed their affinity to +Rome, an exact precision of phrase and a subtle +delicacy of suggestion. Newman had it in the +fullest measure. Dean Church had it, with less +brilliance than Newman, but with no less grace and +dignity. Manning equalled neither of these, but +we catch in him the echo. He wrote abundantly +and on many subjects, always with cleverness +and with the air of one who claimed to belong +to the <i>âmes d’élite</i>, yet his style never attained +the higher kind of literary merit. There was no +imaginative richness about it, neither were there +the weight and penetration that come from sustained +and vigorous thinking. Similarly, with a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_253' name='page_253'></a>253</span> +certain parade of references to history and to +out-of-the-way writers, he gave scant evidence of +solid learning. He was an accomplished disputant +in the sense of knowing thoroughly the more +obvious weaknesses of the Protestant (and especially +of the Anglican) position, and of being able +to contrast them effectively with the external +completeness and formal symmetry of the Roman +system. But he never struck out a new or +illuminative thought; and he seldom ventured +to face—one could indeed sometimes mark him +seeking to elude—a real difficulty.</p> +<p>What, then, was the secret of his great and +long-sustained reputation and influence? It lay +in his power of dealing with men. For the work +of an ecclesiastical ruler he had three inestimable +gifts—a resolute will, captivating manners, and a +tact equally acute and vigilant, by which he +seemed not only to read men’s characters, but to +discern the most effective means of playing on +their motives. To call him an intriguer would be +unjust, because the word, if it does not imply the +pursuit of some mean or selfish object, does +generally connote a resort to unworthy arts; and +the Cardinal was neither dishonourable nor selfish. +But he had the talents which an intriguer needs, +though he used them in a spirit of absolute +devotion to the interests of his Church, and though +he was too much of a gentleman to think that +the interests of the Church, which might justify +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_254' name='page_254'></a>254</span> +a good deal, could be made to justify any and +every means. In conversation he had the art +of seeming to lay his mind alongside of yours, +wishful to know what you had to say, and +prepared to listen respectfully to it, even though +you might be much younger and of no personal +consequence. Yet you sometimes felt, if your +own power of observation had not been lulled to +sleep by the winning manner, that he was watching +you, and watching, in conformity to a settled +habit, the effect upon you of whatever he said. It +was hard not to be flattered by this air of kindly +deference, and natural to admire the great man +who condescended without condescension, even +though one might be secretly disappointed at the +want of freshness and insight in his conversation. +Like his famous contemporary, Bishop +Samuel Wilberforce, Manning was all things to +all men. He was possessed, no doubt, of far +less wit and far less natural eloquence than that +brilliant but variable creature. But he gave +a more distinct impression of earnest and unquestioning +loyalty to the cause he had made his +own.</p> +<p>In the government of his diocese, Manning +showed himself a finished ruler and manager of +men, flexible in his power of adapting himself to +any character or society, yet inflexible when firmness +was needed, usually tactful if not always +gentle in his methods, but tenacious in his purposes, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_255' name='page_255'></a>255</span> +demanding rightfully from others the +simplicity of life and the untiring industry +of which he set an example himself. Over +women his influence was still greater than over +men, because women are more susceptible to +the charm of presence and address; nor could +any other ecclesiastic count so many conversions +among ladies of high station, his dignified carriage +and ascetic face according admirably with +his sacerdotal rank and his life of strict observance. +For some years it was his habit to go to +Rome early in Lent and remain till after Easter. +Promising subjects, who had doubts as to their +probabilities of salvation in the Anglican communion, +used to be invited to dinner to meet +him, and they fell in swift succession before his +skilful presentation of the peace and bliss to be +found within the Roman fold.</p> +<p>In his public appearances, it was neither +the solid substance of his discourses nor the +literary quality of their style that struck one, but +their judicious adaptation to the audience, and +the grace with which they were delivered. For +this reason—originality being rarer and therefore +more precious in the pulpit, where well-worn +themes have to be handled, than on a platform, +where the topic is one of the moment—his +addresses at public meetings were better than his +sermons, and won for him the reputation of a +speaker whom it was well worth while to secure +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_256' name='page_256'></a>256</span> +at any social or philanthropic gathering. At the +Vatican Œcumenical Council of 1870 it was less +by his speeches than by his work in private among +the assembled prelates that he served the Infallibilist +cause. Himself devoted, and, no doubt, +honestly devoted, to Ultramontane principles, he +did not hesitate to do violence to history and join +in destroying what freedom the Church at large +had retained, in order to exalt the Chair of Peter +to a position unheard of even at Trent, not to say +in the Middle Ages. His activity, his assiduity, +and his tireless powers of persuasion contributed +largely to the satisfaction at that Council +of the wishes of Pius IX., who presently rewarded +him with the Cardinalate. But the opponents of +the new dogma, who were as superior in learning +to the Infallibilists as they proved inferior in +numbers, carried back with them to Germany and +North America an undying distrust of the astute +Englishman who had shown more than a convert’s +proverbial eagerness for rushing to extremes +and forcing others to follow. I remember to +have met some of the anti-Infallibilist prelates +returning to America in the autumn of 1870; +and in our many talks on shipboard they spoke of +the Archbishop in terms no more measured than +Nestorius may have used of St. Cyril after the +Council of Ephesus.</p> +<p>But Manning’s powers shone forth most fully +in the course he gave to his policy as Archbishop +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_257' name='page_257'></a>257</span> +of Westminster and head of the Roman +hierarchy in Britain. He had two difficulties +to confront. One was the suspicion of the +old English Roman Catholic families, who distrusted +him as a recent recruit from Protestantism, +a man brought up in ideas unfamiliar to their +conservative minds. The other was the aversion +of the ruling classes in England, and indeed of +Englishmen generally, to the pretensions of Rome +an aversion which, among the Tories, sprang +from deep-seated historical associations, and among +the Whigs drew further strength from dislike to +the reactionary tendencies of the Popedom on the +European continent, and especially its resistance +to the freedom and unity of Italy. In 1850 +the creation by the Pope of a Roman Catholic +hierarchy in England, followed by Cardinal +Wiseman’s letter dated from the Flaminian Gate, +had evoked a burst of anti-papal feeling which +never quite subsided during Wiseman’s lifetime. +Both these enmities Manning overcame. The +old Catholic families rallied to a prelate who +supported with dignity and vigour the pretensions +of their church; while the suspicions of Protestants +were largely, if not universally, allayed +when they noted the attitude of a patriotic +Englishman, zealous for the greatness of his +country, which the Archbishop assumed, as well +as the heartiness with which he threw himself +into moral and philanthropic causes. Loyalty to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_258' name='page_258'></a>258</span> +Rome never betrayed him into any apparent +disloyalty to England. Too prudent to avow +sympathy with either political party, he seemed +less opposed to Liberalism than his predecessor +had been or than most of the English Catholics +were. While, of course, at issue with the Liberal +party upon educational questions, he was believed +to lean to Home Rule, and maintained good relations +with the Irish leaders. He joined those +who worked for the better protection of children +and the repression of vice, advocated total abstinence +by precept and example, and did much to +promote it among the poorer Roman Catholic +population. Discerning the growing magnitude +of what are called labour questions, he did not +recoil from proposals to limit by legislation the +hours of toil, and gladly exerted himself to settle +differences between employers and workmen, +showing his own sympathy with the needs and +hardships of the latter. Thus he won a popularity +with the London masses greater than any +prelate of the Established Church had enjoyed, +while the middle and upper classes noted with +pleasure that, however Ultramontane in his +theology, he always spoke and wrote as an +Englishman upon non-theological subjects.</p> +<p>In this there was no playing of a part, for he +sincerely cared about temperance, the welfare of +children, the advancement of the labouring class, +and the greatness of England. But there was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_259' name='page_259'></a>259</span> +also a sage perception of the incidental service +which his attitude in these matters could render +to his church; and he relished opportunities of +proving that a Catholic prelate could be not only +a philanthropist but also a patriot. He saw the +value of the attitude, though he used it honestly, +and if he was not artful, he was full of art. +Truth, for its own sake, he neither loved nor +sought, but, having once adopted certain conclusions, +doctrinal and practical, subordinated everything +else to them. Power he loved, yet not wholly +for the pleasure which he found in exerting it, but +also because he knew that he was fit to use it, +and could use it, to promote the aims he cherished. +To his church he was devoted heart and soul; nor +could any one have better served it so far as +England was concerned. No one in our time, +hardly even Cardinal Newman, has done so much +to sap and remove the old Protestant fears and +jealousies of Rome, fears and jealousies which +had descended from days when they were less +unreasonable than the liberality or indifference +of our times will allow. Truly the Roman +Church is a wonderful institution, fertile beyond +any other, since in each succeeding age she has +given birth to new types of force suited to the +conditions she has to deal with. In Manning she +developed a figure full of a kind of charm and +strength which could hardly have found due +scope within a Protestant body: a man who never +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_260' name='page_260'></a>260</span> +obtruded a claim, yet never yielded one; who +was the loyal servant of a spiritual despotism, +yet apparently in sympathy with democratic ideas +and movements; equally welcome among the +poorest Irish of his diocese and at the gatherings +of the great; ready to join in every good work +with those most opposed to his own doctrines, +yet standing detached as the austere and unbending +representative of a world-embracing power.</p> +<hr class='tb' /> +<p>Since these pages were written there has +appeared a Life of Cardinal Manning which, for +the variety and interest of its contents, and for the +flood of light which it throws upon its subject, +deserves to rank among the best biographies in +the English language. It reveals the inner life +of Manning, his high motives and his tortuous +methods, his piety and his aspirations, his occasional +lapses from sincerity and rectitude, with a +fulness to which one can scarcely find a parallel. +As was remarked by Mr. Gladstone, who was so +keenly interested in the book that for months he +could talk of little else, it leaves nothing for the +Day of Judgment.</p> +<p>It would be idle to deny that Manning’s +reputation did in some measure suffer. Yet it +must in fairness be remembered that an ordeal +such as that to which he has been thus subjected +is seldom applied, and might, if similarly applied, +have lowered many another reputation. Cicero +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_261' name='page_261'></a>261</span> +has suffered in like manner. We should have +thought more highly of him, though I do not +know that we should have liked him better, if his +letters had not survived to reveal weaknesses +which other men, or their biographers, were discreet +enough to conceal.</p> +<p>I have not attempted to rewrite the preceding +pages in the light of Mr. Purcell’s biography, for +to do so would have extended them beyond the +limits of a sketch. I have, moreover, found that +the disclosures contained in the biography do not +oblige me to darken the colours of the sketch +itself. Taken all in all, these intimate records of +Manning’s life tend to confirm the view that, along +with his love of power and pre-eminence, along +with his carelessness about historic truth, along +with the questionable methods he sometimes +allowed himself to use, there lay deep in his heart +a genuine and unfailing sympathy with many +good causes, such as the cause of temperance, +and a real tenderness for the poor and for +children. If he was far removed from a saint, +still less was he the mere worldly ecclesiastic, +crafty and ambitious, who has in all ages been +a familiar and unlovely type of character.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_262' name='page_262'></a>262</span> +<a name='EDWARD_AUGUSTUS_FREEMAN37' id='EDWARD_AUGUSTUS_FREEMAN37'></a> +<h2>EDWARD AUGUSTUS FREEMAN<a name="FNanchor_37" id="FNanchor_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37" class="fnanchor2">[37]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>Edward Freeman was born at Harborne in +South Staffordshire on 2nd August 1823, and +died at Alicante on 16th March 1892, in the +course of an archæological and historical journey +to the east and south of Spain, whither he had +gone to see the sites of the early Carthaginian +settlements. His life was comparatively uneventful, +as that of learned men in our time +usually is. He was educated at home and at a +private school till he went to Oxford at the age +of eighteen. There he was elected a scholar of +Trinity College in 1841, took his degree (second +class in <i>literae humaniores</i>) in 1845, and was +elected a fellow of Trinity shortly afterwards. +Marrying in 1847, he lost his fellowship, and +settled in 1848 in Gloucestershire, and at a later +time went to live in Monmouthshire, whence +he migrated in 1860 to Somerleaze, a pretty +spot about a mile and a half to the north-west +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_263' name='page_263'></a>263</span> +of Wells in Somerset. Here he lived +till 1884, when he was appointed (on the recommendation +of Mr. Gladstone) to the Regius +Professorship of Modern History at Oxford. +Thenceforth he spent the winter and spring in +the University, returning for the long vacation +to Somerleaze, a place he dearly loved, not only +in respect of the charm of the surrounding +scenery, but from its proximity to the beautiful +churches of Wells and to many places of historical +interest. For the greater part of his manhood +his surroundings were those of a country gentleman, +nor did he ever reconcile himself to town +life, for he loved the open sky, the fields and hills, +and all wild creatures, though he detested what +are called field sports, knew nothing of natural +history, and had neither taste nor talent for +farming. As he began life with an income sufficient +to make a gainful profession unnecessary, +he did not prepare himself for any, but gave free +scope from the first to his taste for study and +research. Thus the record of his life is, with the +exception of one or two incursions into the field +of practical politics, a record of his historical work +and of the journeys he undertook in connection +with it.</p> +<p>History was the joy as well as the labour of +his life. But the conception he took of it was +peculiar enough to deserve some remark. The +keynote of his character was the extraordinary +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_264' name='page_264'></a>264</span> +warmth of his interest in the persons, things, and +places which he cared for, and the scarcely less +conspicuous indifference to matters which lay +outside the well-defined boundary line of his sympathies. +If any branch of inquiry seemed to him +directly connected with history, he threw himself +heartily into it, and drew from it all it could be +made to yield for his purpose. About other subjects +he would neither read nor talk, no matter +how completely they might for the time be filling +the minds of others. While an undergraduate, +and influenced, like most of the abler men among +his Oxford contemporaries, by the Tractarian +opinions and sentiments then in their full force +and freshness,<a name='FNanchor_0031' id='FNanchor_0031'></a><a href='#Footnote_0031' class='fnanchor'>[38]</a> he became interested in church +architecture, discerned the value which architecture +has as a handmaid to historical research, set +to work to study mediæval buildings, and soon +acquired a wonderfully full and exact knowledge +of the most remarkable churches and castles all +over England. He taught himself to sketch, not +artistically, but sufficiently well to record characteristic +points, and by the end of his life he had +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_265' name='page_265'></a>265</span> +accumulated a collection of hundreds of drawings +made by himself of notable buildings in France, +Germany, Italy, and Dalmatia, as well as in the +British Isles. Architecture was always thenceforward +to him the prime external record and +interpreter of history. But it was the only art in +which he took the slightest interest. He cared +nothing for pictures or statuary; was believed +to have once only, when his friend J. R. Green +dragged him thither, visited a picture-gallery in +the course of his numerous journeys; and did not +seem to perceive the significance which paintings +have as revealing the thoughts and social condition +of the time which produced them. Another +branch of inquiry cognate to history which he +prized was comparative philology. With no +great turn for the refinements of classical +scholarship, and indeed with some contempt for +the practice of Latin and Greek verse-making +which used to absorb much of the time and +labour of undergraduates and their tutors at +Oxford and Cambridge, he was extremely fond +of tracing words through different languages so +as to establish the relations of the peoples who +spoke them, and, indeed, used to argue that all +teaching of languages ought to begin with +Grimm’s law, and to base his advocacy of the +retention of Greek as a <i>sine qua non</i> for an Arts +degree in the University on the importance of +that law. But with this love for philology as an +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_266' name='page_266'></a>266</span> +instrument in the historian’s hands, he took little +pleasure in languages simply as languages—that +is to say, he did not care to master, and was not +apt at mastering, the grammar and idioms of a +tongue. French was the only foreign language +he spoke with any approach to ease, though he +could read freely German, Italian, and modern +Greek, and on his tour in Greece made some +vigorous speeches to the people in their own +tongue. He had learnt to pronounce Greek in the +modern fashion, which few Englishmen can do; +but how much of his classically phrased discourses +did the crowds that acclaimed the distinguished +Philhellene understand? So too he was a keen +and well-trained archæologist, but only because +archæology was to him a priceless adjunct—one +might almost say the most trustworthy source—of +the study of early history. As evidence of +his accomplishments as an antiquary I cannot do +better than quote the words of a master of that +subject, who was also one of his oldest friends. +Mr. George T. Clark says:—</p> +<blockquote> +<p>He was an accurate observer, not only of the broad +features of a country but of its ancient roads and earthworks, +its prehistoric monuments, and its earlier and especially its +ecclesiastical buildings. No man was better versed in the +distinctive styles of Christian architecture, or had a better +general knowledge of the earthworks from the study of which +he might hope to correct or corroborate any written records, +and by the aid of which he often infused life and reality into +otherwise obscure narrations.... He visited every spot upon +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_267' name='page_267'></a>267</span> +which the Conqueror is recorded to have set his foot, compared +many of the strongholds of his followers with those +they left behind them in Normandy, and studied the evidence +of Domesday for their character and possessions. When +writing upon Rufus he spent some time in examining the +afforested district of the New Forest, and sought for traces of +the villages and churches said to have been depopulated or +destroyed. And for us archæologists he did more than this. +When he attended a provincial congress and had listened to +the description of some local antiquity, some mound, or +divisional earthbank, or semi-Saxon church, he at once strove +to show the general evidence to be deduced from them, and +how it bore upon the boundaries or formation of some Celtic +or Saxon province or diocese, if not upon the general history +of the kingdom itself.... He thus did much to elevate the +pursuits of the archæologist, and to show the relation they +bore to the far superior labours of the historian.</p> +<p>Freeman was always at his best when in the field. It was +then that the full force of his personality came into play: his +sturdy upright figure, sharp-cut features, flowing beard, well-modulated +voice, clear enunciation, and fluent and incisive +speech. None who have heard him hold forth from the steps +of some churchyard cross, or from the top stone of some half-demolished +cromlech, can ever cease to have a vivid recollection +of both the orator and his theme.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Freeman took endless pains to master the topography +of any place he had to deal with. When +at work in his later years on Sicilian history he +visited, and he has minutely described, the site of +nearly every spot in that island where a battle +or a siege took place in ancient times, so that +his volumes have become an elaborate historical +guide-book for the student or tourist.</p> +<p>But while he thus delighted in whatever bore +upon history as he conceived it, his conception +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_268' name='page_268'></a>268</span> +was one which belonged to the eighteenth century +rather than to our own time. It was to him not +only primarily but almost exclusively a record +of political events—that is to say, of events in +the sphere of war, diplomacy, and government. +He expressed this view with concise vigour in +the well-known dictum, “History is past politics, +and politics is present history”; and though his +friends remonstrated with him against this view +as far too narrow, excluding from the sphere +of history many of its deepest sources of interest, +he would never give way. That historians +should care as much (or more) for the +religious or philosophical opinions of an age, or +for its ethical and social phenomena, or for the +study of its economic conditions, as for forms +of government or battles and sieges, seemed to +him strange. He did not argue against the +friends who differed from him, for he was ready +to believe that there must be something true and +valuable in the views of a man whom he respected; +but he could not be induced to devote +his own labours to the elucidation of these +matters. He would say to Green, “You may +bring in all that social and religious kind of +thing, Johnny, but I can’t.” So when he went +to deliver lectures in the United States, he delighted +in making new acquaintances there, and +was interested in the Federal system and in all +institutions which he could trace to their English +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_269' name='page_269'></a>269</span> +originals, but did not care to see anything or +hear anything about the economic development +or social life of the country.</p> +<p>The same predominant liking for the political +element in history made him indifferent to many +kinds of literature. It may indeed be said that +literature, simply as literature, did not attract +him. In his later years, at any rate, he seldom +read a book except for the sake of the political or +historical information it contained. Among the +writers whom he most disliked were Plato, Carlyle, +and Ruskin, in no one of whom could he see +any merit. Plato, he said, was the only author +he had ever thrown to the other end of the room. +Neither, although very fond of the Greek and +Roman classics generally, did he seem to enjoy +any of the Greek poets except Homer and Pindar +and, to some extent, Aristophanes. His liking +for Pindar used to surprise us, because Pindar is +peculiarly the favourite poet of poetical minds; +and I suspect it was not so much the splendour of +Pindar’s style and the wealth of his imagination +that Freeman enjoyed, as rather the profusion of +historical and mythological references. He was +impatient with the Greek tragedians, and still +more impatient with Virgil, because (as he said) +“Virgil cannot or will not say a thing simply.” +Among English poets his preference was for +the old heroic ballads, such as the songs of +Brunanburh and Maldon, and, among recent +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_270' name='page_270'></a>270</span> +writers, for Macaulay’s <i>Lays</i>. The first thing +he ever published (1850) was a volume of verse, +consisting mainly of ballads, some of them very +spirited, on events in Greek and Moorish history. +It may be doubted if he remembered a line of +Shelley, Keats, Wordsworth, or Tennyson. He +blamed Walter Scott for misrepresenting history +in <i>Ivanhoe</i>, but constantly read the rest of his +stories, taking special pleasure in <i>Peveril of the +Peak</i>. He bestowed warm praise upon <i>Romola</i>, +on one occasion reading it through twice in a +single journey. Mrs. Gaskell’s <i>Mary Barton</i>, +Marryatt’s <i>Peter Simple</i>, Trollope’s <i>The Warden</i> +and <i>Barchester Towers</i>, were amongst his +favourites. Among the moderns, Macaulay was +his favourite prose author, and he was wont to +say that from Macaulay he had learned never +to be afraid of using the same word to describe +the same thing, and that no one was a better +model to follow in the choice of pure English. +Limitations of taste are not uncommon among +eminent men. What was uncommon in Freeman +was the perfect frankness with which he +avowed his aversions, and the absence of any +pretence of caring for things which he did not +really care for. He was in this, as in all other +matters, a singularly simple and truthful man, +never seeking to appear different from what he +was, and finding it hard to understand why other +people should not be equally simple and direct. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_271' name='page_271'></a>271</span> +This directness made him express himself with +an absence of reserve which often gave offence. +Positive and definite, with a strong broad logic +which every one could follow, he was a formidable +controversialist even on subjects outside +history. A good specimen of his powers was +given in the argument against the cruelty of +field sports which he carried on with Anthony +Trollope. His cause was not a popular one in +England, but he stated it so well as to carry off +the honours of the fray.<a name='FNanchor_0032' id='FNanchor_0032'></a><a href='#Footnote_0032' class='fnanchor'>[39]</a></p> +<p>The restriction of his interest to a few topics—wide +ones, to be sure—seemed to increase the +intensity of his devotion to those few; and thus +even the two chief practical interests he had in +life connected themselves with his conception of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_272' name='page_272'></a>272</span> +history. One was the discharge of his duties as +a magistrate in the local government of his county. +While he lived at Somerleaze he rarely missed +Quarter Sessions, speaking seldom, but valuing +the opportunity of taking part in the rule of the +shire. The other was the politics of the time, +foreign politics even more than domestic. He +was from an early age a strong Liberal, throwing +himself into every question which bore on +the Constitution, either in state or in church, for +(as has been said) topics of the social or economic +kind lay rather out of his sphere. When Mr. +Gladstone launched his Irish Home Rule scheme +in 1886, Freeman espoused it warmly, and praised +it for the very point which drew most censure +even from Liberals, the removal of the Irish +members from Parliament. He was intensely +English and Teutonic, and wished the Gael to +be left to settle, or fight over, their own affairs in +their own island, as they had done eight centuries +ago. Even the idea of separating Ireland altogether +from the English Crown would not have +alarmed him, for he did not thank Strongbow +and Henry II. for having invaded it; while, on +the other hand, the plan of turning the United +Kingdom into a federation, giving to England, +Scotland, Ireland, and Wales each a local parliament +of its own, with an imperial parliament +for common concerns, shocked all his historical +instincts.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_273' name='page_273'></a>273</span></div> +<p>In 1859 he was on the point of coming +forward as a parliamentary candidate for the +borough of Newport in Monmouthshire, and +again at the election of 1868 he actually did +stand for one of the divisions of Somerset, and +showed in his platform speeches a remarkable gift +of eloquence, and occasionally, also, of humour, +coupled with a want of those minor arts which +usually contribute more than eloquence does to +success in electioneering. I went round with +him, along with his and my friend Mr. Albert +Dicey, and few are the candidates who get so +much pleasure out of a contest as Freeman did. +He was a strenuous advocate of disestablishment +in Ireland, the question chiefly at issue in the +election of 1868, because he thought the Roman +Catholic Church was of right, and ought by law +to be, the national Church there; but no less +decidedly opposed to disestablishment in England, +where it would have pained him to see the uprooting +of a system entwined with the ideas and +events of the Middle Ages. In his later years +he told me that if the Liberal party took up the +policy of disestablishment in Wales, he did not +know whether he could adhere to them, much as +he desired to do so.</p> +<p>Similarly he disliked all schemes for drawing +the colonies into closer relations with the United +Kingdom, and even seemed to wish that they +should sever themselves from it, as the United +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_274' name='page_274'></a>274</span> +States had done. This view sprang partly from +his feeling that they were very recent acquisitions, +with which the old historic England had nothing +to do, partly also from the impression made +on him by the analogy of the Greek colonies. +He held that the precedent of the Greek +settlements showed the true and proper relation +between a “metropolis,” or mother-city, and her +colonies to be one not of political dependence or +interdependence, but of cordial friendliness and a +disposition to render help, nothing more. These +instances are worth citing because they illustrate +a remarkable difference between his way of looking +historically at institutions and Macaulay’s way. +A friend of his (the late Mr. S. R. Gardiner), +like Freeman a distinguished historian, and like +him a strong Home Ruler, wrote to me upon this +point as follows:—</p> +<blockquote> +<p>Freeman and Macaulay are alike in the high value they +set upon parliamentary institutions. On the other hand, when +Macaulay wants to make you understand a thing, he compares +it with that which existed in his own day. The standard +of the present is always with him. Freeman traces it to +its origin, and testifies to its growth. The strength of this +mode of proceeding in an historian is obvious. Its weakness +is that it does not help him to appreciate statesmanship +looking forward and trying to find a solution of difficult +problems. Freeman’s attitude is that of the people who +cried out for the good laws of King Edward, trying to revive +the past.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Freeman was apt to go beyond his own +dictum about history and politics, for he sometimes +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_275' name='page_275'></a>275</span> +made history present politics as well as +past.</p> +<p>By far the strongest political interest—indeed +it rose to a passion—of his later years was his +hatred of the Turk. In it his historical and +religious sentiment, for there was a good deal +of the Crusader about him, was blended with +his abhorrence of despotism and cruelty. Ever +since the beginning of the Crimean war he had +been opposed to the traditional English policy of +supporting the Sultan. Ever since he had thought +about foreign politics at all he had sympathised +with the Christians of the East. So when Lord +Beaconsfield seemed on the point of carrying the +country into a war with Russia in defence of the +Turks, no voice rose louder or bolder than his in +denouncing the policy then popular with the +upper classes in England. On this occasion he +gave substantial proof of his earnestness by +breaking off his connection with the <i>Saturday +Review</i> because it had espoused the Turkish +cause. This cost him £600 a year, a sum +he could ill spare, and took from him what had +been the joy of his heart, opportunities of delivering +himself upon all sorts of current questions. +But his sense of duty forbade him to write for a +journal which was supporting a misguided policy +and a minister whom he thought unscrupulous.</p> +<p>His habit of speaking out his whole mind +with little regard to the effect his words might +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_276' name='page_276'></a>276</span> +produce, or to the way in which they might +be twisted, sometimes landed him in difficulties. +One utterance raised an outcry at the time, because +it was made at a conference held in London +in December 1876 to oppose Lord Beaconsfield’s +Eastern policy. The Duke of Westminster and +Lord Shaftesbury presided at the forenoon and +afternoon sessions, and the meeting, which told +powerfully on the country, was wound up by Mr. +Gladstone. Freeman’s speech, only ten minutes +long, but an oratorical success at the moment, contained +the words, “Perish the interests of England, +perish our dominion in India, rather than that we +should strike one blow or speak one word on behalf +of the wrong against the right.” This flight +of rhetoric was perverted by his opponents into +“Perish India”; and though he indignantly +repudiated the misrepresentation, it continued to +be repeated against him for years thereafter, and +to be cited as an instance of the irresponsible +violence of the friends of the Eastern Christians.</p> +<p>The most conspicuous and characteristic merits +of Freeman as an historian may be summed up +in six points: love of truth, love of justice, industry, +common sense, breadth of view, and +power of vividly realising the political life of the +past.</p> +<p>Every one knows the maxim, <i>pectus facit +theologum</i>,<a name='FNanchor_0033' id='FNanchor_0033'></a><a href='#Footnote_0033' class='fnanchor'>[40]</a> a maxim accountable, by the way, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_277' name='page_277'></a>277</span> +for a good deal of weak theology. More truly +may it be said that the merits of a great historian +are far from lying wholly in his intellectual +powers. Among the highest of such merits, +merits which the professional student has even +more reason to appreciate than the general reader, +because he more frequently discerns the disturbing +causes, are two moral qualities. One is the zeal +for truth, with the willingness to undertake, in a +search for it, a toil by which no credit will ever +be gained. The other is a clear view of, and +loyal adherence to, the permanent moral standards. +In both these points Freeman stood in the front +rank. He was kindly and fair in his judgments, +and ready to make all the allowances for any +man’s conduct which the conditions of his time +suggested, but he hated cruelty, falsehood, oppression, +whether in Syracuse twenty-four centuries +ago or in the Ottoman empire to-day. That +conscientious industry which spares no pains to +get as near as possible to the facts never failed +him. Though he talked less about facts and +verities than Carlyle did, Carlyle was not so +assiduous and so minutely careful in sifting every +statement before he admitted it into his pages. +That he was never betrayed by sentiment into +partisanship it would be too much to say. +Scottish critics have accused him, perhaps not +without justice, of being led by his English +patriotism to over-state the claims of the English +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_278' name='page_278'></a>278</span> +Crown to suzerainty over Scotland. J. R. Green, +as well as the late Mr. C. H. Pearson, thought +that the same cause disposed him to overlook +the weak points in the character of Harold son +of Godwin, one of his favourite heroes. But +there have been few writers who have so seldom +erred in this way; few who have striven so +earnestly to do full justice to every cause and +every person. Even the race prejudices which +he allowed himself to indulge, in letters and talk, +against Irishmen, Frenchmen, and Jews, scarcely +ever appear in his books. The characters he +has drawn of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, William +the Conqueror and William the Red, St. Thomas +of Canterbury (none of whom he liked), and, in +his <i>History of Sicily</i>, of Nicias, are models of the +fairness which historical portraiture requires. It +is especially interesting to compare his picture +of the unfortunate Athenian with the equally +vigorous but harsher view of Grote. Freeman, +whom many people thought fierce, was one of +the most soft-hearted of men, and tolerant of +everything but perfidy and cruelty. Though +disposed to be positive in his opinions, he was +always willing to reconsider a point when any +new evidence was discovered or any new argument +brought to his notice, and not unfrequently +modified his view in the light of such evidence +or arguments. It was this passion for accuracy +and for that lucidity of statement which is the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_279' name='page_279'></a>279</span> +necessary adjunct of real accuracy, that made him +deal so sternly with confused thinkers and careless +writers. Carelessness seemed to him a moral +fault, because a fault which true conscientiousness +excludes. So also clearness of conception and +exact precision in the use of words were so +natural to him, and appeared so essential to good +work, that he would set down the want of them +rather to indolence than to incapacity, and apply +to them a proportionately severe censure. Mere +ignorance he could pardon, but when it was, as +often happens, even in persons of considerable +pretensions, joined to presumption, his wrath was +the hotter because he deemed it a wholly righteous +wrath. Never touching any subject which he had +not mastered, he thought it his duty as a critic to +expose impostors, and rendered in this way, during +the years when he wrote for the <i>Saturday Review</i>, +services to English scholarship second only to +those which were embodied in his own treatises. +It must be confessed that he enjoyed the work, +and, like Samuel Johnson, was not displeased +to be told that he had “tossed and gored several +persons.”</p> +<p>His determination to get to the bottom of a +question was the cause of the censure he so freely +bestowed both on lawyers, who were wont to +rest content with their technicalities, and not go +back to the historical basis on which those technicalities +rested, and on politicians who fell into +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_280' name='page_280'></a>280</span> +the habit of using stock phrases which muddled +or misrepresented the principles involved. The +expression “national property,” as applied to +tithes, incensed him, and gave occasion for some +of his most vigorous writing. So the commonplace +grumblings against the presence of bishops +in the House of Lords, which may be heard from +people who acquiesce in the presence of hereditary +peers, led him to give the most clear and forcible +statement of the origin and character of that House +which our time has produced. Here he was on +ground he knew thoroughly. But his habits of +accuracy were not less fully illustrated by his attitude +towards branches of history he had not explored. +With a profound and minute knowledge +of English history down to the fourteenth century, +so far as his aversion to the employment of +manuscript authorities would allow, and a scarcely +inferior knowledge of foreign European history +during the same period, with a less full but very +sound knowledge down to the middle of the +sixteenth century, and with a thorough mastery +of pretty nearly all ancient history, his familiarity +with later European history, and with the history +of such outlying regions as India or America, +was not much beyond that of the average educated +man. He used to say when questioned on these +matters that “he had not come down to that +yet.” But when he had occasion to refer to those +periods or countries, he hardly ever made a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_281' name='page_281'></a>281</span> +mistake. If he did not know, he did not refer; +if he referred, he had seized, as if by instinct, +something which was really important and serviceable +for his purpose. The same remark applies +(speaking generally) to Gibbon and to Macaulay, +and I have heard Freeman make it of the writings +of Mr. Goldwin Smith, for whom he had a warm +admiration.</p> +<p>Freeman’s abstention from the use of manuscript +sources was virtually prescribed by his +persistence in refusing to work out of his own +library, or, as he used to say, out of a room +which he could consider to be his library for the +time being. As, however, the original authorities +for the times with which he chiefly dealt +are, with few or unimportant exceptions, all in +print, this habit can hardly be considered a +defect in his historical qualifications. In handling +the sources he was a judicious critic and a +sound scholar, thoroughly at home in Greek and +Latin, and sufficiently equipped in Anglo-Saxon, +or, as he called it, Old English. Of his breadth +of view, of the command he had of the whole +sweep of his knowledge, of his delight in bringing +together things the most remote in place or time, +it is superfluous to speak. These merits are +perhaps most conspicuously seen in the plan of +his treatise on Federal Government, as well as +in the execution of that one volume which unfortunately +was all he produced of what might +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_282' name='page_282'></a>282</span> +have been, if completed, a book of the utmost +value. But one or two trifling illustrations +of this habit of living in an atmosphere in +which the past was no less real to him than +the present may be forgiven. When careless +friends directed letters to him at “Somerleaze, +Wookey, Somerset,” Wookey being a village a +quarter of a mile from his house, but on the other +side of the river Axe, he would write back complaining +that they were “confusing the England +and Wales of the seventh century.” When his +attention had been called to a discussion in the +weekly journals about Shelley’s first wife he wrote +to me, “Why will they worry us with this +<i>Harrietfrage</i>? You and I have quite enough +to do with Helen, and Theodora, and Mary +Stuart.” So in addressing Somersetshire rustics +during his election campaign in 1868, he could +not help on one occasion referring to Ptolemy +Euergetes, and on another launching out into an +eloquent description of the Landesgemeinde of +Uri.</p> +<p>Industry came naturally to Freeman, because +he was fond of his own studies and did not +think of his work as task work. The joy in +reading and writing about bygone times sprang +from the intensity with which he realised them. +He had no geographical imagination, finding +no more pleasure in books of travel than in +dramatic poetry. But he loved to dwell in the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_283' name='page_283'></a>283</span> +past, and seemed to see and feel and make himself +a part of the events he described. Next +to their worth as statements of carefully investigated +facts, the chief merit of his books lies in +the sense of reality which fills them. The politics +of Corinth or Sicyon, the contest of William the +Red with St. Anselm, interested him as keenly +as a general election in which he was himself +a candidate. Looking upon current events with +an historian’s eye, he was fond, on the other +hand, of illustrating features of Roman history +from incidents he had witnessed when taking part +in local government as a magistrate; and in +describing the relations of Hermocrates and +Athenagoras at Syracuse he drew upon observations +which he had made in watching the discussions +of the Hebdomadal Council at Oxford. +This power of realising the politics of ancient +or mediæval times was especially useful to him +as a writer, because without it his minuteness +might have verged on prolixity, seeing that he +cared exclusively for the political part of history. +It was one of the points in which he rose superior +to most of those German students with whom it +is natural to compare him. Many of them have +equalled him in industry and diligence; some have +surpassed him in the ingenuity which they bring +to bear upon obscure problems; but few of them +have shown the same gift for understanding +what the political life of remote times really was. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_284' name='page_284'></a>284</span> +Like Gibbon, Freeman was not a mere student, +but also a man with opportunities of mixing in +affairs, accustomed to bear his share in the world’s +work, and so better able than the mere student +can be to comprehend how that work goes forward. +Though he was too peculiar in his views and his +way of stating them to have been adapted either +to the House of Commons or to a local assembly, +and would indeed have been wasted upon nineteen-twentieths +of the business there transacted, +he loved politics and watched them with a +shrewdly observant eye. Though he indulged +his foibles in some directions, he could turn upon +history a stream of clear common sense which +sometimes made short work of German conjectures. +And he was free from the craving to +have at all hazards something new to advance, +be it a trivial fact or an unsupported guess. He +was accustomed of late years to complain that +German scholarship seemed to be suffering from +the passion for <i>etwas Neues</i>, and the consequent +disposition to disparage work which did not +abound with novelties, however empty or transient +such novelties might be.</p> +<p>To think of the Germans is to think of +industry. Freeman was a true Teuton in the +mass of his production. Besides the seven thick +volumes devoted to the Norman Conquest and +William Rufus, the four thick volumes to Sicily, +four large volumes of collected essays, and nine or +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_285' name='page_285'></a>285</span> +ten smaller volumes on architectural subjects, on +the English constitution, on the United States, +on the Slavs and the Turks, he wrote an even +greater quantity of matter which appeared in the +<i>Saturday Review</i> during the twenty years from +1856 to 1876, and it was by these articles, not +less than by his books, that he succeeded in +dispelling many current errors and confusions, +and in establishing some of his own doctrines +so firmly that we now scarcely remember what +iteration and reiteration, in season and out of +season, and much to the impatience of those +who remembered that they had heard these +doctrines often before, were needed to make them +accepted by the public. Freeman’s swift facility +was due to his power of concentration. He +always knew what he meant an article to contain +before he sat down to his desk; and in his +historical researches he made each step so certain +that he seldom required to reinvestigate a point +or to change, in revising for the press, the substance +of what he had written.</p> +<p>In his literary habits he was so methodical +and precise that he could carry on three undertakings +at the same time, keeping on different +tables in his working rooms the books he needed +for each, and passing at stated hours from one +to the other. It is often remarked that the +growth of journalism, forcing men to write +hastily and profusely, tends to injure literature +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_286' name='page_286'></a>286</span> +both in matter and in manner. In point of +matter, Freeman, though for the best part of +his life a very prolific journalist, did not seem +to suffer. He was as exact, clear, and thorough +at the end as he had been at the beginning. +On his style, however, the results were unfortunate. +It retained its force and its point, +but it became diffuse, not that each particular +sentence was weak, or vague, or wordy, but that +what was substantially the same idea was +apt to be reiterated, with slight differences of +phrase, in several successive sentences or paragraphs. +He was fond of the Psalter, great part +of which he knew by heart, and we told him +that he had caught too much of the manner of +Psalm cxix. This tendency to repetition caused +some of his books, and particularly the <i>Norman +Conquest</i> and <i>William Rufus</i>, to swell to a portentous +bulk. Those treatises, which constitute +a history of England from <span class='smcaplc'>A.D.</span> 1042 to 1100, +would be more widely read if they had been, +as they ought to have been, reduced to three or +four volumes; and as he came to perceive this, +he resolved in the last year of his life to +republish the <i>Norman Conquest</i> in a condensed +form. To be obliged to compress was a wholesome, +though unwelcome, discipline, and the +result is seen in some of his smaller books, such +as the historical essays, and the sketches of +English towns, often wonderfully fresh and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_287' name='page_287'></a>287</span> +vigorous bits of work. Anxiety to be scrupulously +accurate runs into prolixity, and Freeman +so loved his subjects that it pained him +to omit any characteristic detail a chronicler +had preserved; as he once observed to a distinguished +writer who was dealing with a much +later period, “You know so much about your +people that you have to leave out a great deal, +I know so little that I must tell all I know.” +The tendency to repeat the same word too frequently +sprang from his preference for words of +Teutonic origin and his pride in what he +deemed the purity of his English. His pages +would have been livelier had he felt free to +indulge in the humour with which his private +letters sparkled; for he was full of fun, though it +often turned on points too recondite for the public. +But it was only in the notes to his histories, and +seldom even there, that he gave play to one of +the merits that most commended him to his +friends.</p> +<p>So far of his books. He was, however, also +Regius Professor of History at Oxford during +the last eight years of his life, and thus the head +of the historical faculty in his own university +which he dearly loved. That he was less +effective as a teacher than as a writer may be +partly ascribed to his having come too late to +a new kind of work, and one which demands +the freshness of youth; partly also to the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_288' name='page_288'></a>288</span> +cramping conditions under which professors +have to teach at Oxford, where everything is +governed by a system of examinations which +Freeman was never tired of denouncing as +ruinous to study. His friends, however, doubted +whether the natural bent of his mind was +towards oral teaching. It was a peculiar +mind, which ran in a deep channel of its +own, and could not easily, if the metaphor +be permissible, be drawn off to irrigate the +adjoining fields. He was always better at +putting his own views in a clear and telling +way than at laying his intellect alongside of +yours, apprehending your point of view, and +setting himself to meet it. Or, to put the same +thing differently, you learned more by listening +to him than by conversing with him. He +had not the quick intellectual sympathy and +effusion which feels its way to the heart of an +audience, and indeed derives inspiration from the +sight of an audience. In his election meetings +I noticed that the temper and sentiment of the +listeners did not in the least affect him; what +he said was what he himself cared to say, not +what he felt they would wish to hear. So +also in his lecturing he pleased himself, and +chose the topics he liked best rather than those +which the examination scheme prescribed to the +students. Perhaps he was right, for he was of those +whose excellence in performance depends upon +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_289' name='page_289'></a>289</span> +the enjoyment they find in the exercise of their +powers. But even on the topics he selected, he +did not take hold of and guide the mind of the +students, realising their particular difficulties and +needs, but simply delivered his own message in +his own way. Admitting this deficiency, the fact +remains that he was not only an ornament to the +University by the example he set of unflagging +zeal, conscientious industry, loyalty to truth, and +love of freedom, but also a stimulating influence +upon those who were occupied with history. +He delighted to surround himself with the most +studious of the younger workers, gave them +abundant encouragement and recognition, and +never grudged the time to help them by his +knowledge or his counsel.</p> +<p>Much the same might be said of his lifelong +friend and illustrious predecessor in the chair of +history (Dr. Stubbs), whom Freeman had been +generously extolling for many years before the +merits of that admirable scholar became known to +the public. Stubbs disliked lecturing; and though +once a year he delivered a “public lecture” full of +wisdom, and sometimes full of wit also, he was not +effective as a teacher, not so effective, for instance, +as Bishop Creighton, who won his reputation +at Merton College long before he became Professor +of Ecclesiastical History at Cambridge. +But Stubbs, by his mere presence in the University, +and by the inexhaustible kindness with +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_290' name='page_290'></a>290</span> +which he answered questions and gave advice, +rendered great services to the studies of the place. +It may be doubted whether, when he was raised +to the episcopal bench, history did not lose more +than the Church of England gained. Other men +of far less ability could have discharged five-sixths +of a bishop’s duties equally well, but there was no +one else in England, if indeed in Europe, capable +of carrying on his historical researches. So +Dr. Lightfoot was, as Professor at Cambridge, +doing work for Christian learning even more +precious than the work which is still affectionately +remembered in his diocese of Durham.</p> +<p>Few men have had a genius for friendship +equal to Freeman’s. The names of those he +cared for were continually on his lips, and their +lives in his thoughts; their misfortunes touched +him like his own; he was always ready to +defend them, always ready to give any aid they +needed. No differences of opinion affected his +regard. Sensitive as he was to criticism, he +received their censure on any part of his work +without offence. The need he felt for knowing +how they fared and for sharing his thoughts with +them expressed itself in the enormous correspondence, +not of business, but of pure affection, which +he kept up with his many friends, and which +forms, for his letters were so racy that many of +them were preserved, the fullest record of his +life.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_291' name='page_291'></a>291</span></div> +<p>This warmth of feeling deserves to be dwelt +on, because it explains the tendency to vehemence +in controversy which brought some enmities +upon him. There was an odd contrast between +his fondness for describing wars and battles and +that extreme aversion to militarism which made +him appear to dislike the very existence of a +British army and navy. So his combativeness, +and the zest with which he bestowed shrewd +blows on those who encountered him, though +due to his wholesome scorn for pretenders, and +his hatred of falsehood and injustice, seemed +inconsistent with the real kindliness of his nature. +The kindliness, however, no one who knew him +could doubt; it showed itself not only in his +care for dumb creatures and for children, but in +the depth and tenderness of his affections. Of +religion he spoke little, and only to his most +intimate friends. In opinion he had drifted a +long way from the Anglo-Catholic position of +his early manhood; but he remained a sincerely +pious Christian.</p> +<p>Though his health had been infirm for some +years before his death, his literary activity did +not slacken, nor did his powers show signs of +decline. There is nothing in his writings, nor +in any writings of our time, more broad, clear, +and forcible than many chapters of the <i>History +of Sicily</i>. Much of his work has effected its +purpose, and will, by degrees, lose its place in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_292' name='page_292'></a>292</span> +the public eye. But much will live on into a +yet distant future, because it has been done so +thoroughly, and contains so much sound and +vigorous thinking, that coming generations of +historical students will need it and value it almost +as our own has done.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_293' name='page_293'></a>293</span> +<a name='ROBERT_LOWE_VISCOUNT_SHERBROOKE41' id='ROBERT_LOWE_VISCOUNT_SHERBROOKE41'></a> +<h2>ROBERT LOWE VISCOUNT SHERBROOKE<a name="FNanchor_41" id="FNanchor_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41" class="fnanchor2">[41]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>Had Robert Lowe died in 1868, when he became +a Cabinet Minister, his death would have been a +political event of the first magnitude; but when +he died in 1892 (in his eighty-second year) hardly +anybody under forty years of age knew who Lord +Sherbrooke was, and the new generation wondered +why their seniors should feel any interest in the +disappearance of a superannuated peer whose +name had long since ceased to be heard in either +the literary or the political world. It requires +an effort to believe that he was at one time held +the equal in oratory and the superior in intellect +of Mr. Bright and Mr. Gladstone. There are few +instances in our annals of men who have been +equally famous and whose fame has been bounded +by so short a span out of a long life.</p> +<p>No one who knew Lowe ever doubted his +abilities. He made a brilliant reputation, first at +Winchester (where, as his autobiography tells us, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_294' name='page_294'></a>294</span> +he was miserable) and then at Oxford, where he was +the contemporary and fully the peer of Roundell +Palmer (afterwards Lord Chancellor Selborne) +and of Archibald Tait (afterwards Archbishop of +Canterbury). He was much sought after and +wonderfully effective as a private tutor or “coach” +in classical subjects, being not only an excellent +scholar but extremely clear and stimulating as a +teacher. He retained his love of literature all +through life, and made himself, <i>inter alia permulta</i>, +a good Icelandic scholar and a fair Sanskrit +scholar. For mathematics he had no turn at all. +Active sports, he tells us, he enjoyed, characteristically +adding, “they open to dulness also its road +to fame.” When he left the University, where +anecdotes of his caustic wit were long current, he +tried his fortune at the Bar, but with such scant +success that he presently emigrated to New +South Wales, soon rose to prominence and unpopularity +there, returned in ten years with a +tolerable fortune and a detestation of democracy, +became a leading-article writer on the <i>Times</i>, +entered Parliament, but was little heard of till +Lord Palmerston gave him (in 1859) the place of +Vice-President of the Committee of Council on +Education. His function in that office was to +administer the grants made from the national +treasury to elementary schools, and as he found +the methods of inspection rather lax, and noted a +tendency to superficiality and a neglect of backward +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_295' name='page_295'></a>295</span> +children, he introduced new rules for the +distribution of the grant (the so-called “Revised +Code”) which provoked violent opposition. The +motive was good, but the rules were too mechanical +and rigid and often worked harshly; so he +was presently driven from office by an attack led +by Lord Robert Cecil (now Lord Salisbury).</p> +<p>Though Lowe became known by this struggle, +his conspicuous fame dates from 1865, when he +appeared as the trenchant critic of a measure for +extending the parliamentary franchise in boroughs, +introduced by a private member. Next year +his powers shone forth in their full lustre. The +Liberal Ministry of Lord Russell, led in the +House of Commons by Mr. Gladstone, had +brought in a Franchise Extension Bill (applying +to boroughs only) which excited the dislike +of the more conservative or more timid among +their supporters. This dislike might not have gone +beyond many mutterings and a few desertions +but for the vehemence with which Lowe opposed +the measure. He fought against it in a series of +speeches which produced a greater impression in +the House of Commons, and roused stronger +feelings of admiration and hostility in the +country, than any political addresses had done +since 1832. The new luminary rose so suddenly +to the zenith, and cast so unexpected a +light that everybody was dazzled; and though +many dissented, and some attacked him bitterly, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_296' name='page_296'></a>296</span> +few ventured to meet him in argument on the +ground he had selected. The effect of these +speeches of 1866 can hardly be understood by +any one who reads them to-day unless he knows +how commonplace and “practical,” that is to +say, averse to general reasonings and historical +illustrations, the character of parliamentary debating +was becoming even in Lowe’s time. It +is still more practical and still less ornate in our +own day.</p> +<p>The House of Commons then contained, +and has indeed usually contained (though some +Houses are much better than others), many capable +lawyers, capable men of business, capable +country gentlemen; many men able to express +themselves with clearness, fluency, and that sort +of temperate good sense which Englishmen +especially value. Few, however, were able to +produce finished rhetoric; still fewer had a range +of thought and knowledge extending much beyond +the ordinary education of a gentleman and +the ordinary ideas of a politician; and the assembly +was one so intolerant of rhetoric, and so much inclined +to treat, as unpractical, facts and arguments +drawn from recondite sources, that even those who +possessed out-of-the-way learning were disposed, +and rightly so, to use it sparingly. In Robert +Lowe, however, a remarkable rhetorical and dialectical +power was combined with a command +of branches of historical, literary, and economic +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_297' name='page_297'></a>297</span> +knowledge so unfamiliar to the average member +as to have for him all the charm of novelty. +The rhetoric was sometimes too elaborate. The +political philosophy was not always sound. But +the rhetoric was so polished that none could fail +to enjoy it; and the political philosophy was put +in so terse, bright, and pointed a form that it +made the ordinary country gentleman fancy himself +a philosopher while he listened to it in the +House or repeated it to his friends at the club. +The speeches, which, though directed against +a particular measure, constituted an indictment +of democratic government in general, had the +advantages of expressing what many felt but +few had ventured to say, and of being delivered +from one side of the House and cheered by +the other side. No position gives a debater in +the House of Commons such a vantage ground +for securing attention. Its rarity makes it remarkable. +If the speaker who attacks his own +party is supposed to do so from personal motives, +the personal element gives piquancy. If he may +be credited with conscientious conviction, his +shafts strike with added weight, for how strong +must conviction be when it turns a man against +his former friends. Accordingly, nothing so +much annoys a party and gratifies its antagonists +as when one of its own recalcitrant +members attacks it in flank. When one looks +back now at the contents of these speeches—there +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_298' name='page_298'></a>298</span> +were only five or six of them—and finds +one’s self surprised at their success, this favouring +circumstance and the whole temper of the +so-called “upper classes” need to be remembered. +The bulk of the wealthier commercial +class and a large section of the landed class had +theretofore belonged to the Liberal party. Most +of them, however, were then already beginning +to pass through what was called Whiggism into +habits of thought that were practically Tory. +They did not know how far they had gone till +Lowe’s speeches told them, and they welcomed +his ideas as justifying their own tendencies.</p> +<p>In themselves, as pieces either of rhetoric or +of “civil wisdom,” the speeches are not first-rate. +No one would dream of comparing them to +Burke’s, in originality, or in richness of diction, +or in weight of thought. But for the moment +they were far more appreciated than Burke’s +were by the House of his time, which thought of +dining while he thought of convincing. Robert +Lowe was for some months the idol of a large +part of the educated class, and indeed of that +part chiefly which plumed itself upon its culture. +I recollect to have been in those days at a +breakfast party given by an eminent politician +and nominal supporter of the Liberal Ministry, +and to have heard Mr. G. S. Venables, the leader +of the <i>Saturday Review</i> set, an able and copious +writer who was a sort of literary and political +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_299' name='page_299'></a>299</span> +oracle among his friends, deliver, amid general +applause, including that of the host, the opinion +that Lowe was an intellectual giant compared to +Mr. Gladstone, and that the reputation of the +latter had been extinguished for ever.</p> +<p>This period of glory, which was enhanced by +the fall of Lord Russell and Mr. Gladstone from +power in June 1866—the defeat came on a minor +point, but was largely due to Lowe’s speeches—lasted +till Lowe, who had now become a force to +be counted with, obtained office as Chancellor of +the Exchequer in the Liberal Ministry which +Mr. Gladstone formed in the end of 1868. From +that moment his position declined. He lost popularity +and influence both with the country and in +the House of Commons. His speeches were +always able, but they did not seem to tell when +delivered from the ministerial bench. His financial +proposals, though ingenious, were thought +too ingenious, and showed a deficient perception +of the tendencies of the English mind. No +section likes being taxed, but Lowe’s budgets +met with a more than usually angry opposition. +His economies and retrenchments, so far from +bringing him the credit he deserved, exposed +him to the charge of cheese-paring parsimony, +and did much to render the Ministry unpopular. +Before that ministry fell in 1874, Lowe, who +had in 1873 exchanged the Exchequer for the +Home Office, had almost ceased to be a personage +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_300' name='page_300'></a>300</span> +in politics. He did nothing to retrieve his fame +during the six years of Opposition that followed, +seldom spoke, took little part in the denunciation +of Lord Beaconsfield’s Eastern and Afghan policy, +which went on from 1876 till 1880, and once at +least gave slight signs of declining mental power. +So in 1880 he was relegated to the House of +Lords, because the new Liberal Government of +that year could not make room for him. Very +soon thereafter his memory began to fail, and for +the last ten years of his life he had been practically +forgotten, though sometimes seen, a pathetic +figure, at evening parties. There is hardly a +parallel in our parliamentary annals to so complete +an eclipse of so brilliant a luminary.</p> +<p>This rapid obscuration of a reputation which +was genuine, for Lowe’s powers had been amply +proved, was due to no accident, and was apparent +long before mental decay set in. The causes lay +in himself. One cause was purely physical. He +was excessively short-sighted, so much so that +when he was writing a letter, his nose was apt to +rub out the words his pen had traced; and this +defect shut him out from all that knowledge of +individual men and of audiences which is to be +obtained by watching their faces. Mr. Gladstone, +who never seemed to resent Lowe’s attacks, and +greatly admired his gifts—it was not so clear +that Lowe reciprocated the admiration—used to +relate that on one occasion when a foreign potentate +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_301' name='page_301'></a>301</span> +met the Minister in St. James’s Park and put +out his hand in friendly greeting, Lowe repelled +his advances, and when the King said, “But, Mr. +Lowe, you know me quite well,” he answered, +“Yes, indeed, I know you far too well, and I don’t +want to have anything more to do with you.” +He had mistaken the monarch for a prominent +politician with whom he had had a sharp encounter +on a deputation a few days before! For +social purposes Lowe might almost as well have +been blind; yet he did not receive that kind of +indulgence which is extended to the blind. In +the interesting fragment of autobiography which +he left, he attributes his unpopularity entirely to +this cause, declaring that he was really of a kindly +nature, liking his fellow-men just as well as most +of them like one another.<a name='FNanchor_0034' id='FNanchor_0034'></a><a href='#Footnote_0034' class='fnanchor'>[42]</a> But in truth his own +character had something to answer for. Without +being ill-natured, he was deemed a hard-natured +man, who did not appear to consider the feelings +of others. He had indeed a love of mischief, +and gleefully tells in his autobiography how, +when travelling in his youth through the Scottish +Highlands, he drove the too self-conscious Wordsworth +wild by his incessant praise of Walter Scott.<a name='FNanchor_0035' id='FNanchor_0035'></a><a href='#Footnote_0035' class='fnanchor'>[43]</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_302' name='page_302'></a>302</span> +He had not in political life more than his fair +share of personal enmities. One of them was +Disraeli’s. They were not unequally matched. +Lowe was intellectually in some respects stronger, +but he wanted Disraeli’s skill in managing men +and assemblies. Disraeli resented Lowe’s sarcasms, +and on one occasion, when the latter had +made an indiscreet speech, went out of his way +to inflict on him a personal humiliation.</p> +<p>Nor was this Lowe’s only defect. Powerful +in attack, he was feeble in defence. Terrible as +a critic, he had, as his official career showed, little +constructive talent, little tact in shaping or recommending +his measures. Unsteady or inconstant +in purpose, he was at one moment headstrong, +at another timid or vacillating. These faults, +scarcely noticed when he was in Opposition, +sensibly reduced his value as a minister and as a +Cabinet colleague.</p> +<p>In private Lowe was good company, bright, +alert, and not unkindly. He certainly did not, +as was alleged of another famous contemporary, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_303' name='page_303'></a>303</span> +Lord Westbury, positively enjoy the giving of +pain. But he had a most unchristian scorn for the +slow and the dull and the unenlightened, and never +restrained his scorching wit merely for the sake of +sparing those who came in his way. If the distinction +be permissible, he was not cruel but he +was merciless, that is to say, unrestrained by compassion. +Instances are not wanting of men who +have maintained great influence in spite of their +rough tongues and the enmities which rough +tongues provoke. But such men have usually +also possessed some of the arts of popularity, and +have been able to retain the adherence of their +party at large, even when they had alienated +many who came into personal contact with them. +This was not Lowe’s case. He did not conceal +his contempt for the multitude, and had not the +tact needed for humouring it, any more than for +managing the House of Commons. The very +force and keenness of his intellect kept him aloof +from other people and prevented him from understanding +their sentiments. He saw things so +clearly that he could not tolerate mental confusion, +and was apt to reach conclusions so fast +that he missed perceiving some of the things +which are gradually borne in upon slower minds. +There are also instances of strong men who, +though they do not revile their opponents, incur +hatred because their strength and activity make +them feared. Hostility concentrates itself on the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_304' name='page_304'></a>304</span> +opponents deemed most formidable, and a political +leader who is spared while his fellows are attacked +cannot safely assume that this immunity is a +tribute to his virtues. Incessant abuse fell to +the lot of Mr. Bright, who was not often, and of +Mr. Gladstone, who was hardly ever, personally +bitter in invective. But in compensation Mr. +Bright and Mr. Gladstone received enthusiastic +loyalty from their followers. For Lowe there was +no such compensation. Even his own side did +not love him. There was also a certain harshness, +perhaps a certain narrowness, about his views. +Even in those days of rigid economics, he took +an exceptionally rigid view of all economic problems, +refusing to make allowance for any motives +except those of bare self-interest. Though he +did not belong by education or by social +ties to the Utilitarian group, and gave an ungracious +reception to J. S. Mill’s first speeches +in the House of Commons, he was a far more +stringent and consistent exponent of the harder +kind of Benthamism than was Mill himself. He +professed, and doubtless to some extent felt, a +contempt for appeals to historical or literary +sentiment, and relished nothing more than deriding +his own classical training as belonging to an +effete and absurd scheme of education. He left +his mark on our elementary school system by +establishing the system of payment by results, +but nearly every change made in that system +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_305' name='page_305'></a>305</span> +since his day has tended to destroy the alterations +he made and to bring back the older condition +of things, though no doubt in an amended form. +His ideas of University reform were crude and +barren, limited, indeed, to the substitution of what +the Germans call “bread studies” for mental cultivation, +and to the extension of the plan of competitive +examinations for honours and money +prizes, a plan which more and more displeases +the most enlightened University teachers, and +is felt to have done more harm than good to +Oxford and Cambridge, where it has had the +fullest play. He had also, and could give good +reasons for his opinion, a hearty dislike to endowments +of all kinds; and once, when asked +by a Royal Commission to suggest a mode of +improving their application, answered in his +trenchant way, “Get rid of them. Throw them +into the sea.”</p> +<p>It would not be fair to blame Lowe for the +results which followed his vigorous action against +the extension of the suffrage in 1866, for no one +could then have predicted that in the following +year the Tories, beguiled by Mr. Disraeli, would +reverse their former attitude and carry a suffrage +bill far wider than that which they had rejected a +year before. But the sequel of the successful +resistance of 1866 may stand as a warning to +those who think that the course of thoroughgoing +opposition to a measure they dislike is, because +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_306' name='page_306'></a>306</span> +it seems courageous, likely to be the right and +wise course for patriotic men. Had the moderate +bill of 1866 been suffered to pass, the question of +further extending the suffrage might possibly have +slept for another thirty years, for there was no +very general or urgent cry for it among the working +people, and England would have continued +to be ruled in the main by voters belonging to +the middle class and the upper section of the +working class. The consequence of the heated +contest of 1866 was not only to bring about +a larger immediate change in 1867, but to +create an interest in the question which soon +prompted the demand for the extension of household +suffrage to the counties, and completed in +1884-85 the process by which England has become +virtually a democracy, though a plutocratic +democracy, still affected by the habits and notions +of oligarchic days. Thus Robert Lowe, as much +as Disraeli and Gladstone, may in a sense be +called an author of the tremendous change which +has passed upon the British Constitution since +1866, and the extent of which was not for a +long while realised. Lowe himself never recanted +his views, but never repeated his declaration +of them, feeling that he had incurred +unpopularity enough, and probably feeling also +that the case was hopeless.</p> +<p>People who disliked his lugubrious forecasts +used to call him a Cassandra, perhaps forgetting +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_307' name='page_307'></a>307</span> +that, besides the distinctive feature of Cassandra’s +prophecies that nobody believed them, there was +another distinctive feature, viz. that they came +true. Did Lowe’s? It is often profitable and +sometimes amusing to turn back to the predictions +through which eminent men relieved their +perturbed souls, and see how far these superior +minds were able to discern the tendencies, already +at work in their time, which were beginning to +gain strength, and were destined to determine +the future. Whoever reads Lowe’s speeches of +1865-67 may do worse than glance at the same +time at a book,<a name='FNanchor_0036' id='FNanchor_0036'></a><a href='#Footnote_0036' class='fnanchor'>[44]</a> long since forgotten, which contains +the efforts of a group of young University +Liberals to refute the arguments used by him +and by Lord Cairns, the strongest of his allies, +in their opposition to schemes of parliamentary +reform.</p> +<p>To compare the optimism of these young +writers and Lowe’s pessimism with what has +actually come to pass is a not uninstructive +task. True it is that England has had only +thirty-five years’ experience of the Reform Act +of 1867, and only seventeen years’ experience +of that even greater step towards pure democracy +which was effected by the Franchise and +Redistribution Acts of 1884-85. We are still +far from knowing what sorts of Parliaments and +policies the enlarged suffrage will end by giving. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_308' name='page_308'></a>308</span> +But some at least of the mischiefs Lowe foretold +have not arrived. He expected first of all a +rapid increase in corruption and intimidation at +parliamentary elections. The quality of the +House of Commons would decline, because money +would rule, and small boroughs would no longer +open the path by which talent could enter. +Members would be either millionaires or demagogues, +and they would also become far more +subservient to their constituents. Universal +suffrage would soon arrive, because no halting-place +between the £10 franchise<a name='FNanchor_0037' id='FNanchor_0037'></a><a href='#Footnote_0037' class='fnanchor'>[45]</a> and universal +suffrage could be found. Placed on a democratic +basis, the House of Commons would not be able +to retain its authority over the Executive. The +House of Lords, the Established Church, the +judicial bench (in that dignity and that independence +which are essential to its usefulness), would +be overthrown as England passed into “the bare +and level plain of democracy where every ant-hill +is a mountain and every thistle a forest tree.” +These and the other features characteristic of +popular government on which Lowe savagely +descanted were pieced together out of Plato and +Tocqueville, coupled with his own disagreeable +experiences of Australian politics. None of the +predicted evils can be said to have as yet become +features of the polity and government of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_309' name='page_309'></a>309</span> +England,<a name='FNanchor_0038' id='FNanchor_0038'></a><a href='#Footnote_0038' class='fnanchor'>[46]</a> though the power of the House relatively +to the Cabinet does seem to be declining. +Yet some of Lowe’s incidental remarks are true, +and not least true is his prediction that democracies +will be found just as prone to war, just as apt to +be swept away by passion, as other kinds of +government have been. Few signs herald the +approach of that millennium of peace and enlightenment +which Cobden foretold and for which +Gladstone did not cease to hope.</p> +<p>No one since Lowe has taken up the part of +<i>advocatus diaboli</i> against democracy which he +played in 1866.<a name='FNanchor_0039' id='FNanchor_0039'></a><a href='#Footnote_0039' class='fnanchor'>[47]</a> Since Disraeli passed the Household +Suffrage in Boroughs Bill in 1867, a nullification +of Lowe’s triumph which incensed him +more than ever against Disraeli, no one has ever +come forward in England as the avowed enemy +of changes designed to popularise our government. +Parties have quarrelled over the time and +the manner of extensions of the franchise, but the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_310' name='page_310'></a>310</span> +issue of principle raised in 1866 has not been +raised again. Even in 1884, when Mr. Gladstone +carried his bill for assimilating the county franchise +to that existing in boroughs, the Tory party did +not oppose the measure in principle, but confined +themselves to insisting that it should be accompanied +by a scheme for the redistribution of seats. +The secret, first unveiled by Disraeli, that the +masses will as readily vote for the Tory party as +for the Liberal, is now common property, and +universal suffrage, when it comes to be offered, is +as likely to be offered by the former party as by +the latter. This gives a touch of historical interest +to Lowe’s speeches of 1866. They are the +swan-song of the old constitutionalism. The +changes which came in 1867 and 1884 must have +come sooner or later, for they were in the natural +line of development as we see it all over the +world; but they might have come much later +had not Lowe’s opposition wrecked the moderate +scheme of 1866. Apart from that episode Lowe’s +career would now be scarcely remembered, or +would be remembered by those who knew his +splendid gifts as an illustration of the maxim that +mere intellectual power does not stand first among +the elements of character that go to the winning +of a foremost place.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_311' name='page_311'></a>311</span> +<a name='WILLIAM_ROBERTSON_SMITH' id='WILLIAM_ROBERTSON_SMITH'></a> +<h2>WILLIAM ROBERTSON SMITH</h2> +</div> +<p>Robertson Smith,<a name='FNanchor_0040' id='FNanchor_0040'></a><a href='#Footnote_0040' class='fnanchor'>[48]</a> the most widely learned and +one of the most powerful teachers that either +Cambridge or Oxford could show during the +years of his residence in England, died at the +age of forty-seven on the 31st of March 1894. +To the English public generally his name was +little known, or was remembered only in connection +with the theological controversy and ecclesiastical +trial of which he had been the central figure +in Scotland fifteen years before. But on the +Continent of Europe and by Orientalists generally +he was regarded as the foremost Semitic scholar +of Britain, and by those who knew him as one of +the most remarkable men of his time.</p> +<p>He was born in 1846 in the quiet pastoral +valley of the Don, in Aberdeenshire. His father, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_312' name='page_312'></a>312</span> +who was a minister of the Scottish Free Church +in the parish of Keig, possessed high mathematical +talent, and his mother, who survived him six years, +was a woman of great force of character, who +retained till her death, at seventy-six years of +age, the full exercise of her keen intelligence. +Smith went straight from his father’s teaching to +the University of Aberdeen, and after graduating +there, continued his studies first at Bonn in 1865, +and afterwards at Göttingen (1869). When only +twenty-four he became Professor of Oriental +Languages in the College or Divinity School of +the Free Church at Aberdeen, and two years +later was chosen one of the revisers of the Old +Testament, a striking honour for so young a +man. In 1881 he became first assistant-editor +and then editor-in-chief of the ninth edition of the +<i>Encyclopædia Britannica</i>. He was exceptionally +qualified for the post by the variety of his attainments +and by the extreme quickness of his mind, +which rapidly acquired knowledge on almost any +kind of subject. Those who knew him are agreed +that among all the eminent men who have been +connected with this great <i>Encyclopædia</i> from its +first beginning nearly a century and a half ago until +now, he was surpassed by none, if equalled by any, +in the range of his learning and in the capacity to +bring learning to bear upon editorial work. He +took infinite pains to find the most competent +writers, and was able to exercise effective personal +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_313' name='page_313'></a>313</span> +supervision over a very large proportion of +the articles. The ninth edition was much fuller +and more thorough than any of its predecessors; +and good as the first twelve volumes were, a still +higher level of excellence was attained in the latter +half, a result due to his industry and discernment. +Not a few of the articles on subjects connected +with the Old Testament were from his own pen; +and they were among the best in the work.</p> +<p>The appearance of one of them, that entitled +“Bible,” which contained a general view of the +history of the canonical books of Scripture, their +dates, authorship, and reception by the Christian +Church, became a turning-point in his life. The +propositions he stated regarding the origin of +parts of the Old Testament, particularly the +Pentateuch, excited alarm and displeasure in +Scotland, where few persons had become aware +of the conclusions reached by recent Biblical +scholars in Continental Europe. The article +was able, clear, and fearless, plainly the work +of a master hand. The views it advanced were +not for the most part due to Smith’s own investigations, +but were to be found in the writings +of other learned men. Neither would they now +be thought extreme; they are in fact accepted to-day +by many writers of unquestioned orthodoxy +in Britain and a (perhaps smaller) number in the +United States. In 1876, however, these views +were new and startling to those who had not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_314' name='page_314'></a>314</span> +studied in Germany or followed the researches of +such men as Ewald, Kuenen, and Wellhausen. +The Scottish Free Church had theretofore prided +itself upon the rigidity of its orthodoxy; and while +among the younger ministers there were a good +many able and learned scholars holding what used +to be called “advanced views,” the mass of the +elder and middle-aged clergy had gone on in the +old-fashioned traditions of verbal inspiration, and +took every word in the Five Books (except the +last chapter of Deuteronomy) to have been written +down by Moses. It was only natural that their +anger should be kindled against the young professor, +whose theories seemed to cut away the +ground from under their feet. Proceedings were +(1876) taken against him before the Presbytery +of Aberdeen, and the case found its way thence +to the Synod of Aberdeen, and ultimately to the +General Assembly of the Free Church. In one +form or another (for the flame was lit anew by +other articles published by him in the <i>Encyclopædia</i>) +it lingered on for five years. So far from +yielding to the storm, Robertson Smith defied it, +maintaining not only the truth of his views, but +their compatibility with the Presbyterian standards +as contained in the Confession of Faith and the +Longer and Shorter Catechisms. In this latter +contention he was successful, proving that the +divines of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries +had not committed themselves to any specific +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_315' name='page_315'></a>315</span> +doctrine of inspiration, still less to any dogmatic +deliverance as to the authorship of particular +books of Scripture. The standards simply declared +that the Word of God was contained in the +canonical books, and as there had been little or +no controversy between Protestants and Roman +Catholics regarding the date or the authorship or +the divine authority of those books (apart of +course from disputes regarding the Apocrypha), +had not dealt specifically with those last mentioned +matters. As it was by reference to the +Confession of Faith that the offence alleged had +to be established, Smith made good his defence; +so in the end, finding it impossible to convict him +of deviation from the standards, and thereby to +deal with him as an ordained minister of the +Church, his adversaries fell back on the plan +of depriving him, by an executive rather than +judicial vote, not indeed of his clerical status, +but of his professorship, on the ground of the +alleged “unsettling character” of his teaching.</p> +<p>Meanwhile, however, there had been an immense +rally to him of the younger clergy and +of the less conservative among the laity. The +main current of Scottish popular thought and +life had ever since the Reformation flowed in +an ecclesiastical channel; and even nowadays, +when Scotland is rapidly becoming Anglicised, +a theological or ecclesiastical question excites a +wider and keener interest there than a similar +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_316' name='page_316'></a>316</span> +question would do in England. So in Scotland +for four years “the Robertson Smith case” was +the chief topic of discussion outside as well as +inside the Free Church. The sympathy felt for +the accused was heightened by the ingenuity, +energy, and courage with which he defended his +position, showing a power of argument and +repartee which made it plain that he would +have held a distinguished place in any assembly +whatever. If his debating had a fault, it was +that of being almost too dialectically cogent, so +that his antagonists felt that they were being +foiled on the form of the argument before they +could get to the issues they sought to raise. +But while he was an accomplished lawyer in +matters of form, he was no less an accomplished +theologian in matters of substance. Although the +party of repression triumphed so far as to deprive +him of his chair, the victory virtually remained +with him, not only because he had shown that the +Scottish Presbyterian standards did not condemn +the views he held, but also because his defence +and the discussions which it occasioned had, in +bringing those views to the knowledge of a great +number of thoughtful laymen, led such persons +to reconsider their own position. Some of them +found themselves forced to agree with Smith. +Others, who distrusted their capacity for arriving +at a conclusion, came at least to think that the +questions involved did not affect the essentials of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_317' name='page_317'></a>317</span> +faith, and must be settled by the ordinary canons +of historical and philological criticism. Thus the +trial proved to be a turning-point for the Scottish +Churches, much as the <i>Essays and Reviews</i> case +had been for the Church of England eighteen +years earlier. Opinions formerly proscribed were +thereafter freely expressed. Nearly all the doctrinal +prosecutions subsequently attempted in +the Scottish Presbyterian Churches have failed. +Much feeling has been excited, but the result +has been to secure a greater latitude than was +dreamt of forty years ago. At first the rigidly +orthodox section of the Free Church, now +almost confined to the Highlands, thought of +seceding from the main body on the ground +that tolerance was passing into indifference or +unbelief. But the new ideas continued to grow, +and the sentiment in favour of letting clergymen +as well as lay church members put a lax construction +on the doctrinal standards drawn up in the +sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, has spread +as widely in Scotland as in England. The Presbyterian +Churches in America and the Roman +Catholic Church now stand almost alone among +the larger Christian bodies in retaining something +of the ancient rigidity. Even the Roman +Church begins to feel the solvent power of these +researches. It may be conjectured that as the +process of adjusting the letter of Scripture to the +conclusions of science which Galileo was not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_318' name='page_318'></a>318</span> +permitted to apply in the field of astronomy has +now been generally applied in the fields of geology +and biology, so all the churches will presently reconcile +themselves to the conclusions of historical +and linguistic criticism, now that such criticism +has become truly scientific in its methods.</p> +<p>Having no longer any tie to Scotland, as he +had never desired a pastoral charge there, since +he felt his vocation to lie in study and teaching, +Smith was hesitating which way to turn, when the +offer of the Lord Almoner’s Readership in Arabic, +which had become vacant in 1883, determined +him to settle in Cambridge. He had travelled +in Arabia a few years earlier, thereby adding a +colloquial familiarity to his grammatical mastery +of the language. He was an ardent student of +Arabic literature, and indeed devoted more time +to it than to Hebrew. Though he had felt +deeply the attacks made upon him, and was +indignant at the mode of his dismissal, he was +not in the least dispirited; and his self-control +was shown by the way in which he resisted the +temptation, to which controversialists are prone, +of going further than they originally meant and +thereby damaging the position of their supporters. +Still, he was weary of controversy, and pleased to +see before him a prospect of learned quiet and +labour, although the salary of the Readership +was less than £100 a year. Fortunately he +had come to a place where gifts like his were +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_319' name='page_319'></a>319</span> +appreciated. The Master and Fellows of Christ’s +College elected him to a fellowship with no +duties of tuition attached to it—a wise and graceful +recognition of his merits which did them the +more credit because they had very little personal +knowledge of him, while he had possessed no +prior tie with the University. Christ’s is one of +the smaller colleges, but has almost always had +men of distinction among its fellows, and has maintained +a high standard of teaching. In the list of +its alumni stand the names of John Milton, Isaac +Barrow, Ralph Cudworth, and Charles Darwin. +Robertson Smith dwelt in it for the rest of his +days, entering into the life of hall and common-room +with great zest, for he was of an extremely +sociable turn, and the College became proud of +him. When a vacancy occurred in the office of +University Librarian, he was chosen to fill it. +His knowledge of and fondness for books fitted +him excellently for the place, but the details of +administration worried him, and it was a change +for the better when (in 1889), on the death +of his friend, William Wright, he became Professor +of Arabic.<a name='FNanchor_0041' id='FNanchor_0041'></a><a href='#Footnote_0041' class='fnanchor'>[49]</a> His efforts to build up a +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_320' name='page_320'></a>320</span> +school of Oriental studies on the foundations laid +by Wright, and with the help of an eminent +Syriac scholar, Bensley, were proving successful, +and a considerable number of able young men +were gathering round him, when (in 1890) the +hand of disease fell upon him, obliging him first +to curtail and afterwards to intermit his lectures. +The last year of his life was a year of suffering, +borne with uncomplaining fortitude.</p> +<p>What with work on the <i>Encyclopædia Britannica</i>, +with the distractions of his prolonged trial, +with the time spent in oral teaching, and with +the physical weakness of his latest years, Smith’s +leisure available for literary production was not +large, and the books he has left do not adequately +represent either his accumulated knowledge or +his faculty of investigation. The earlier books—<i>The +Old Testament in the Jewish Church</i> and +<i>The Prophets of Israel</i> (the latter a series of +lectures delivered at Glasgow)—are comparatively +popular in handling. The two later—<i>Kinship +and Marriage in Early Arabia</i> and <i>The Religion +of the Semites</i>—are more abstruse and technical, +and also more original, dealing with topics in +which their author was a pioneer, though he +had been influenced by, and acknowledged in +the amplest way his obligations to, his friend +John F. Maclennan, the author of <i>Primitive +Marriage</i>. <i>The Religion of the Semites</i>, though +masterly in plan and execution, and though it +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_321' name='page_321'></a>321</span> +has excited the admiration of the few Oriental +scholars competent to appraise its substantial +merit, suffers from its incompleteness. Only +the first volume was published, for death overtook +the author before he could put into +final shape the materials he had collected for the +full development of his theories. As the second +volume would have traced the connection between +the primitive religion of the Arab branches of the +Semitic stock (including Israel) and the Hebrew +religion as we have it in the earlier books of the Old +Testament, the absence of this finished statement +is a loss to science. Changes had passed upon +his views since he wrote the incriminated articles, +and he said to me (I think about 1888) that he +would no longer undertake any clerical duties. +He had a sensitive conscience, and held that no +clergyman ought to use language in the pulpit +which did not express his personal convictions.</p> +<p>What struck one most in Robertson Smith’s +writings was the easy command wherewith he +handled his materials. His generalisations were +based on an endlessly patient and careful study of +details, a study in which he never lost sight of +guiding principles. With perfect lucidity and an +unstrained natural vigour, there was a sense of +abounding and overflowing knowledge which inspired +confidence in the reader, making him feel +he was in the hands of a master. On all that +pertained to the languages and literature of the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_322' name='page_322'></a>322</span> +Arabic branch of the Semitic races, ancient and +modern (for he did not claim to be an Assyriologist), +his knowledge was accurate no less than +comprehensive. Full of deference to the great +scholars—no one spoke with a warmer admiration +of Nöldeke, Wellhausen, and Lagarde than he did—he +was a stringent critic of unscientific work in +the sphere of history and physics as well as in +that of philology, quick to expose the uncritical +assumptions or loose hypotheses of less careful +though more pretentious students. He used to +say that when he had disposed of the <i>Encyclopædia +Britannica</i>, he might undertake a “Dictionary of +European Impostors.” Oriental lore was only +one of many subjects in which he might have +achieved distinction. His mathematical talents +were remarkable, and during two sessions he +taught with conspicuous success the class of +Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh +as assistant professor. He had a competent +acquaintance with not a few other practical +arts, including navigation, and once, when the +compasses of the vessel on which he was sailing +in the Red Sea got out of order, he proved to be +the person on board most competent to set them +right. In metaphysics and theology, in ancient +history and many departments of modern history, +he was thoroughly at home. Few, indeed, were +the subjects that came up in the course of conversation +on which he was not able to throw light, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_323' name='page_323'></a>323</span> +for the range of his acquirements was not more +striking than the swiftness and precision with +which he brought knowledge to bear wherever +it was wanted.</p> +<p>There was hardly a line of practical life in +which he might not have attained a brilliant +success. But the passion for knowledge made +him prefer the life of a scholar, and seemed to +have quenched any desire even for literary fame.</p> +<p>Learning is commonly thought of as a weight +to be carried, which makes men dull, heavy, or +pedantic. With Robertson Smith the effect seemed +to be exactly the opposite. Because he knew so +much, he was interested in everything, and threw +himself with a joyous freshness and keenness into +talk alike upon the most serious and the lightest +topics. He was combative, apt to traverse a proposition +when first advanced, even though he might +come round to it afterwards; and a discussion +with him taxed the defensive acumen of his +companions. Having once spent five weeks +alone with him in a villa at Alassio on the +Riviera, I observed to him when we parted +that we had had (as the Americans say) “a +lovely time” together, and that there was not +an observation I had made during those weeks +which he had not contested. He laughed +and did not contest that observation. Yet this +tendency, while it made his society more stimulating, +did not make it less agreeable, because +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_324' name='page_324'></a>324</span> +he never seemed to seek to overthrow an +adversary, but only to get at the truth of the +case, and his manner, though positive, had about +it nothing either acrid or conceited. One could +imagine no keener intellectual pleasure than his +company afforded, for there was, along with an +exuberant wealth of thought and knowledge, an +intensity and ardour which lit up every subject +which it touched. I once invited him and John +Richard Green (the historian) to meet at dinner. +They took to one another at once, nor was it easy +to say which lamp burned the brighter. Smith +had wider and more accurate learning, and stronger +logical power, but Green was just as swift, just as +fertile, just as ingenious. In stature Smith, like +Green, was small, almost diminutive; his dark +brown eyes bright and keen; his speech rapid; +his laugh ready and merry, for he had a quick +sense of humour and a power of enjoying things +as they came. The type of intellect suggested +a Teutonic Scot of the Lowlands, but in appearance +and temperament he was rather a Scottish +Celt of the Highlands, with a fire and a gaiety, +an abounding vivacity and vitality, which made +him a conspicuous figure wherever he lived, in +Aberdeen, in Edinburgh, in Cambridge. Even +by his walk, with its quick, irregular roll, one could +single him out at a distance in the street.</p> +<p>When a man is attractive personally, he is +all the more attractive for being unlike other +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_325' name='page_325'></a>325</span> +men, and he often becomes the centre of a +group. This was the case with Smith. His +numerous friends were so much interested by +him that when they met their talk was largely +of him, and many friendships were based on +a common knowledge of this one person. Indeed, +the geniality, elevation, and simplicity of +his character gave him a quite unusual hold on +those who had come to know him well. Few +men, leading an equally quiet and studious life, +have inspired so much regard and affection in so +large a number of persons; few teachers have had +an equal power of stimulating and attracting their +pupils. He loved teaching hardly less than he +loved the investigation of truth, and he was the +most faithful and sympathetic of friends, one +who was felt to be unique while he lived and +irreplaceable when he had departed.</p> +<p>I have spoken of the courage he had shown +in confronting his antagonists in the ecclesiastical +courts. That courage did not fail him in the +severer trials of his last illness. The nature of +the disease of which he died was disclosed to +him by his physician in September 1892, while +an international Congress of Orientalists, in which +he presided over the Semitic section, was holding +its meetings. A festival dinner was being given +in honour of the Congress the same afternoon. +When the physician had spoken, Smith simply +remarked, “This means the death my brother +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_326' name='page_326'></a>326</span> +died” (one of his brothers had been struck by +the same malady a few years before). He went +straight to the dinner, and was throughout the +evening the gayest and brightest of the guests.</p> +<p>Fancy sometimes indulges herself in imagining +what part the eminent men one has known would +have played had their lot been cast in some other +age. So I have fancied that Archbishop Tait +(described in an earlier chapter) ought to have +been Primate of England under Edward the +Sixth or Elizabeth. He would have guided the +course of reform more prudently and more firmly +than Cranmer did; he would have shown a broader +spirit than did Parker or Whitgift. So Cardinal +Manning, had he lived in the seventeenth century, +might haply have become General of the Jesuit +Order, and enjoyed the secret control of the politics +of the Catholic world. So Robertson Smith, had +he been born in the great age of the mediæval +universities, might, like the bold dialectician of +whom Dante speaks, have “syllogised invidious +truths”<a name='FNanchor_0042' id='FNanchor_0042'></a><a href='#Footnote_0042' class='fnanchor'>[50]</a> in the University of Paris; or had Fortune +placed him two centuries later among the scholars +of the Italian Renaissance in its glorious prime, +the fame of his learning might have filled half +Europe.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_327' name='page_327'></a>327</span> +<a name='HENRY_SIDGWICK' id='HENRY_SIDGWICK'></a> +<h2>HENRY SIDGWICK</h2> +</div> +<p>Henry Sidgwick was born at Skipton, in Yorkshire, +where his father was headmaster of the +ancient grammar school of the town, on 31st +May 1838.<a name='FNanchor_0043' id='FNanchor_0043'></a><a href='#Footnote_0043' class='fnanchor'>[51]</a> The family belonged to Yorkshire. +He was a precocious boy, and used to delight his +brothers and sister by the fertility of his imagination +in inventing games and stories. Educated +at Rugby School under Goulburn (afterwards +Dean of Norwich), he was sent at an unusually +early age to Trinity College, Cambridge. His +brilliant University career was crowned by the +first place in the classical tripos and by a first +class in the mathematical tripos, and he was +speedily elected a Fellow of Trinity. Intellectual +curiosity and an interest in the problems +of theology presently drew him to Germany, +where he worked at Hebrew and Arabic under +Ewald at Göttingen, as well as with other +eminent teachers. After hesitating for a time +whether to devote himself to Oriental studies +or to classical scholarship, he was drawn back to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_328' name='page_328'></a>328</span> +philosophy by his desire to investigate questions +bearing on natural theology, and finally settled +down to the pursuit of what are called in Cambridge +the moral sciences—metaphysics, ethics, and +psychology; becoming first a College Lecturer +and then (in 1875) a University Prælector in +these subjects. In 1869 he resigned his fellowship, +feeling that he could no longer consider +himself a “<i>bona fide</i> member of the Church of +England,” that being the condition then attached +by law to the holding of fellowships in the +Colleges at Cambridge. This step caused surprise, +for the test was deemed a very vague and light +one, having been recently substituted for a more +stringent requirement, and there had been many +holders of fellowships who were at least as little +entitled to call themselves <i>bona fide</i> members +of the Established Church as he was. But, +as was afterwards said of him by Mrs. Cross +(George Eliot), Sidgwick was expected by his +intimate friends to conform to standards higher +than average men prescribe for their own conduct. +Taken in conjunction with the fact that +several English Dissenters and Scottish Presbyterians +had won the distinction of a Senior +Wranglership and been debarred from fellowships, +though they were in theological opinion more +orthodox than some nominal members of the +Established Church who were holding fellowships, +Sidgwick’s conscientious act made a great impression +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_329' name='page_329'></a>329</span> +in Cambridge and did much to hasten +that total abolition of tests in the Universities +which was effected by statute in 1871; for in +England concrete instances of hardship and injustice +are more powerful incitements to reform +than the strongest abstract arguments, and Sidgwick +was already so eminent and so respected +a figure that all Cambridge felt the absurdity of +excluding such a man from its honours and emoluments. +In 1883 he was appointed Professor of +Moral Philosophy, and continued to hold that post +till three months before his death in 1900, when +failing health determined him to resign it.</p> +<p>His life was the still and tranquil life of the +thinker, teacher, and writer, varied by no events +more exciting than those controversies over +reforms in the studies and organisation of the +University in which his sense of public duty +frequently led him to bear a part.</p> +<p>These I pass over, but there is one branch of +his active work to which special reference ought +to be made, viz. the part he took in promoting the +University education of women. In or about the +year 1868 he joined with the late Miss Anne +Jane Clough (sister of the poet Arthur Clough) +and a few other friends in establishing a course +of lectures and a hall of residence for women +at Cambridge, which grew into the institution +called Newnham College. It and Girton College, +founded by other friends of the same cause +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_330' name='page_330'></a>330</span> +about the same time, were the first two institutions +in England which provided for women, +together with residential accommodation, a complete +University training equivalent and similar +to that provided by the two ancient English +universities for men. The teaching was mainly +given by the University professors and lecturers, +the curriculum was the same as the University +prescribed, and the women students, though not +legally admitted to the University, were examined +by the University examiners at the same +time as the other students. Henry Sidgwick +was, from the foundation of Newnham onwards, +the moving spirit and the guiding hand among +its University friends, the spirit which inspired +the policy and the hand which piloted the +fortunes of the College. Its growth to its present +dimensions, and its usefulness, not only directly, +but through the example it has set, have been +largely due to his assiduous care and temperate +wisdom. He had married (in 1876) Miss Eleanor +Mildred Balfour, and when she accepted the principalship +of Newnham after Miss Clough’s death, in +1889, he and she transferred their residence to +the College, and lived thenceforward at it. The +England of our time has seen no movement of +opinion more remarkable or more beneficial than +that which has recognised the claims of women +to the highest kind of education, and secured a +substantial, if still incomplete, provision therefor. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_331' name='page_331'></a>331</span> +The change has come so quietly and unobtrusively +that few people realise how great it +is. Few, indeed, remember what things were +forty years ago, as few realise when waste lands +have been stubbed and drained and tilled what +they were like in their former state. No one did +more than Sidgwick to bring about this change. +Besides his work for Newnham, he took a lead +in all the movements that have been made to +obtain for women a fuller admission to University +privileges, and well deserved the gratitude of +Englishwomen for his unceasing efforts on their +behalf.</p> +<p>The obscure problems of psychology had a +great attraction for him, and he spent much time +in investigating them, being one of the founders, +and remaining all through his later life a leading +and guiding member, of the Society for Psychical +Research, which has for the last twenty years +cultivated this field with an industry and ability +which have deserved larger harvests than have +yet been reaped. Two remarkable men, both +devoted friends of his, worked with him, Edmund +Gurney and Frederic Myers the poet, the latter +of whom survived him a few months only. It +was characteristic of Sidgwick that he never committed +himself to any of the bold and possibly +over-sanguine anticipations formed by some of +the other members of the Society, while yet he +never was deterred by failure, or by the discovery +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_332' name='page_332'></a>332</span> +of deceptions, sometimes elaborate and long sustained, +from pursuing inquiries which seemed to +him to have an ultimate promise of valuable +results. The phenomena, he would say, may be +true or false; anyhow they deserve investigation. +The mere fact that so many persons believe them +to be genuine is a problem fit to be investigated. +If they are false, it will be a service to have +proved them so. If they contain some truth, +it is truth of a kind so absolutely new as to be +worth much effort and long effort to reach it. In +any case, science ought to take the subject out of +the hands of charlatans.</p> +<p>The main business of his life, however, was +teaching and writing. Three books stand out as +those by which he will be best remembered—his +<i>Methods of Ethics</i>, his <i>Principles of Political +Economy</i>, and his <i>Elements of Politics</i>. All three +have won the admiration of those who are experts +in the subjects to which they respectively relate, +and they continue to be widely read in universities +both in Britain and in America. All +three bear alike the peculiar impress of his mind.</p> +<p>It was a mind of singular subtlety, fertility, +and ingenuity, which applied to every topic an +extremely minute and patient analysis. Never +satisfied with the obvious view of a question, +it seemed unable to acquiesce in any broad and +sweeping statement. It discovered objections to +every accepted doctrine, exceptions to every rule. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_333' name='page_333'></a>333</span> +It perceived minute distinctions and qualifications +which had escaped the notice of previous writers. +These qualities made Sidgwick’s books somewhat +difficult reading for a beginner, who was apt to +ask what, after all, was the conclusion to which he +had been led by an author who showed him the +subject in various lights, and added not a few minor +propositions to that which had seemed to be the +governing one. But the student who had already +some knowledge of the topic, who, though he +apprehended its main principles, had not followed +them out in detail or perceived the difficulties in +applying them, gained immensely by having so +many fresh points presented to him, so many +fallacies lurking in currently accepted notions +detected, so many conditions indicated which +might qualify the amplitude of a general proposition. +The method of discussion was stimulating. +Sometimes it reminded one of the Socratic +method as it appears in Plato, but more frequently +it was the method of Aristotle, who +discusses a subject first from one side, then from +another, throws out a number of remarks, not +always reconcilable, but always suggestive, regarding +it, and finally arrives at a view which he +delivers as being probably the best, but one +which must be taken subject to the remarks +previously made. The reader often feels in +Sidgwick’s treatment of a subject as he often +feels in Aristotle’s, that he would like to be left +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_334' name='page_334'></a>334</span> +with something more definite and positive, something +that can be easily delivered to learners as +an established truth. He desires a bolder and +broader sweep of the brush. But he also feels +how much he is benefited by the process of +sifting and analysing to which every conception +or dogma is subjected, and he perceives that +he is more able to handle it afterwards in his +own way when his attention has been called to +all these distinctions and qualifications or antinomies +which would have escaped any vision less +keen than his author’s. For those who, in an age +prone to hasty reading and careless thinking, are +disposed to underrate the difficulties of economic +and political questions, and to walk in a vain +conceit of knowledge because they have picked +up some large generalisations, no better discipline +can be prescribed than to follow patiently such +a treatment as Sidgwick gives; nor can any +reader fail to profit from the candour and the +love of truth which illumine his discussion of a +subject.</p> +<p>The love of truth and the sense of duty guided +his life as well as his pen. Though always +warmly interested in politics, he was of all the +persons I have known the least disposed to be +warped by partisanship, for he examined each +political issue as it arose on its own merits, apart +from predilections for either party or for the +views of his nearest friends. We used to wonder +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_335' name='page_335'></a>335</span> +how such splendid impartiality would have stood a +practical test such as that of the House of Commons. +His loyalty to civic duty was so strong as +on one occasion to bring him, in the middle of +his vacation, all the way from Davos, in the +easternmost corner of Switzerland, to Cambridge, +solely that he might record his vote at a parliamentary +election, although the result of the election +was already virtually certain.</p> +<p>Sidgwick’s attitude toward the Benthamite +system of Utilitarianism illustrates the cautiously +discriminative habit of mind I have sought to +describe. If he had been required to call himself +by any name, he would not have refused that +of Utilitarian, just as in mental philosophy he +leaned to the type of thought represented by the +two Mills rather than to the Kantian idealism of +his friend and school contemporary, the Oxford +professor T. H. Green. But the system of +Utility takes in his hands a form so much more +refined and delicate than was given to it by +Bentham and James Mill, and is expounded with +so many qualifications unknown to them, that it +has become a very different thing, and is scarcely, +if at all, assailable by the arguments which moralists +of the idealistic type have brought against +the older doctrine. Something similar may be +said of his treatment of bimetallism in his book +on political economy. While assenting to some of +the general propositions on which the bimetallic +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_336' name='page_336'></a>336</span> +theory rests, he points out so many difficulties in +the application of that theory to the actual conditions +of currency that his assent cannot be cited +as a deliverance in favour of trying to turn theory +into practice. He told me in 1896 that he held +the political and other practical objections to an +attempt to establish a bimetallic system to be virtually +insuperable. When he treats of free trade, he +is no less guarded and discriminating. He points +out various circumstances or conditions under +which a protective tariff may become, at least +for a time, justifiable, but never abandons the +free trade principle as being generally true and +sound, a principle not to be departed from +save for strong reasons of a local or temporary +kind. His general economic position is equally +removed from the “high and dry” school of +Ricardo on the one hand, and from the “Katheder-Sozialisten” +and the modern “sentimental” school +on the other. In all his books one notes a tendency +to discover what can be said for the view +which is in popular disfavour, even often for +that which he does not himself adopt, and to +set forth all the objections to the view which +is to receive his ultimate adhesion. There is a +danger with such a method of losing breadth and +force of effect. One is ready to cry, “Do lapse +for a moment into dogmatism.” Yet it ought to be +added that Sidgwick’s subtlety is always restrained +by practical good sense, as well as by the desire to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_337' name='page_337'></a>337</span> +reconcile opposite views. His arguments, though +they often turn on minute distinctions, are not +bits of fine-drawn ingenuity, but have weight and +substance in them.<a name='FNanchor_0044' id='FNanchor_0044'></a><a href='#Footnote_0044' class='fnanchor'>[52]</a></p> +<p>One book of his which has not yet (December +1902) been published, but which I have had the +privilege of reading in proof, displays his constructive +power in another light. It is a course +of lectures on the development of political institutions +in Europe from early times down to our +own. Here, as he is dealing with concrete matter, +the treatment is more broad, and the line of +exposition and argument more easy to follow, than +in the treatises already referred to. It is a masterly +piece of work, and reveals a wider range of +historical knowledge and a more complete mastery +of historical method than had been shown in his +earlier books, or indeed than some of his friends +had known him to possess.</p> +<p>The tendency to analysis rather than to construction, +the abstention from the deliverance of +doctrines easy to comprehend and repeat, which +belong to his writings on ethics and economics, +do not impair the worth of his literary criticisms. +In this field his fine perception and discriminative +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_338' name='page_338'></a>338</span> +taste had full scope. He was an incessant reader, +especially of poetry and novels, with a retentive +memory for poetry, as well as a finely modulated +and expressive voice in reciting it. His literary +judgments had less of a creative quality, if the +expression be permissible, than Matthew Arnold’s, +but are not otherwise inferior to those of that +brilliant though sometimes slightly prejudiced +critic. No one of his contemporaries has surpassed +Sidgwick in catholicity and reasonableness, +in the power of delicate appreciation, or in an +exquisite precision of expression. His essay on +Arthur Hugh Clough, prefixed to the latest edition +of Clough’s collected poems, is a good specimen +of this side of his talent. Clough was one of +his favourites, and has indeed been called the +pet poet of University men. Sidgwick’s literary +essays, which appeared occasionally in magazines, +were few, but they well deserve to be collected and +republished, for this age of ours, though largely +occupied in talking about literature, has produced +comparatively little criticism of the first order.</p> +<p>Sidgwick did not write swiftly or easily, because +he weighed carefully everything he wrote. +But his mind was alert and nimble in the highest +degree. Thus he was an admirable talker, seeing +in a moment the point of an argument, seizing on +distinctions which others had failed to perceive, +suggesting new aspects from which a question +might be regarded, and enlivening every topic +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_339' name='page_339'></a>339</span> +by a keen yet sweet and kindly wit. Wit, +seldom allowed to have play in his books, +was one of the characteristics which made his +company charming. Its effect was heightened +by a hesitation in his speech which often +forced him to pause before the critical word +or phrase of the sentence had been reached. +When that word or phrase came, it was sure +to be the right one. Though fond of arguing, +he was so candid and fair, admitting all that +there was in his opponent’s case, and obviously +trying to see the point from his opponent’s side, +that nobody felt annoyed at having come off +second best, while everybody who cared for good +talk went away feeling not only that he knew +more about the matter than he did before, but +that he had enjoyed an intellectual pleasure of a +rare and high kind. The keenness of his penetration +was not formidable, because it was joined +to an indulgent judgment: the ceaseless activity +of his intellect was softened rather than reduced +by the gaiety of his manner. His talk was conversation, +not discourse, for though he naturally +became the centre of nearly every company in +which he found himself, he took no more than +his share. It was like the sparkling of a brook +whose ripples seem to give out sunshine.</p> +<p>Though Sidgwick’s writings are a mine of +careful and suggestive thinking, he was even +more remarkable than his books. Though his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_340' name='page_340'></a>340</span> +conversation was delightful, the impression of its +fertility and its wit was the least part of the +impression which his personality produced. An +eminent man is known to the world at large by +what he gives them in the way of instruction or +of pleasure. A man is prized and remembered +by his friends for what he was in the intercourse +of life. Few men of our time have influenced +so wide or so devoted a circle of friends as did +Henry Sidgwick; few could respond to the calls +of friendship with a like sympathy or wisdom. +His advice was frequently asked in delicate +questions of conduct, and he was humorously +reminded that, by his own capacity as well as +by the title of his chair, he was a professor of +casuistry. His stores of knowledge and helpful +criticism were always at the service of his pupils +or his fellow-workers.</p> +<p>From his earliest college days he had been +just, well-balanced, conscientious alike in the pursuit +of truth and in the regulation of his own life, +appearing to have neither prejudices nor enmities, +and when he had to convey censure, choosing the +least cutting words in which to convey it. Yet +in earlier years there had been in him a touch +of austerity, a certain remoteness or air of detachment, +which confined to a very few persons +the knowledge of his highest qualities. As he +grew older his purity lost its coldness, his keenness +of discernment mellowed into a sweet and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_341' name='page_341'></a>341</span> +persuasive wisdom. A life excellently conducted, +a life which is the expression of fine qualities, and +in which the acts done are in harmony with the +thoughts and words of the man, is itself a beautiful +product, whether of untutored nature or of +thought and experience turning every faculty to +the best account. In the modern world the two +types of excellence which we are chiefly bidden +to admire are that of the active philanthropist +and that of the saint. The ancient world produced +and admired another type, to which some +of its noblest characters conformed, and which, in +its softer and more benignant aspect, Sidgwick +presented. In his indifference to wealth and +fame and the other familiar objects of human +desire, in the almost ascetic simplicity of his daily +life, in his pursuit of none but the purest pleasures, +in his habit of subjecting all impulses to the law +of reason, the will braced to patience, the soul +brought into harmony with the divinely appointed +order, he seemed to reproduce one of those philosophers +of antiquity who formed a lofty conception +of Nature and sought to live in conformity +with her precepts. But the gravity of a Stoic +was relieved by the humour and vivacity which +belonged to his nature, and the severity of a Stoic +was softened by the tenderness and sympathy +which seemed to grow and expand with every +year. In Cambridge, where, though the society +is a large one, all the teachers become personally +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_342' name='page_342'></a>342</span> +known to one another, and the students have +opportunities of familiar intercourse with the +teachers, affection as well as admiration gathered +round him. His thoughts quickened and his +example inspired generation after generation of +young men passing through the University out +into the life of England, as a light set high upon +the bank beams on the waves of a river gliding +swiftly to the sea.</p> +<p>It was a life of single-minded devotion to truth +and friendship, a life serene and gentle, free alike +from vanity and from ambition, bearing without +complaint the ill-health which sometimes checked +his labours, viewing with calm fortitude those +problems of man’s life on which his mind was +always fixed, untroubled in the presence of death.</p> +<table summary=''><tr><td> +<p class='cg'>Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas<br /> +Quique metus omnes et inexorabile fatum<br /> +Subiecit pedibus strepitumque Acherontis avari.</p> +</td></tr></table> +<p>When his friends heard of his departure there +rose to mind the words in which the closing scene of +the life of Socrates is described by the greatest of +his disciples, and we thought that among all those +we had known there was none of whom we could +more truly say that in him the spirit of philosophy +had its perfect work in justice, in goodness, and +in wisdom.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_343' name='page_343'></a>343</span> +<a name='EDWARD_ERNEST_BOWEN53' id='EDWARD_ERNEST_BOWEN53'></a> +<h2>EDWARD ERNEST BOWEN<a name="FNanchor_53" id="FNanchor_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor2">[53]</a></h2> +</div> +<p>Ever since the publication of Stanley’s Life of +Dr. Arnold that eminent headmaster has been +taken as the model of a great teacher and ruler +of boys, the man who, while stimulating the intelligence +of his pupils, was even more concerned +to discipline and mould their moral natures. +Arnold has become the type of what Carlyle +might have called “The Hero as Schoolmaster.” +Though there have been many able men at the +head of large schools since his time, including +three who afterwards rose to be Archbishops of +Canterbury, as well as a good many who have +become bishops, his fame remains unrivalled, and +the type created by his career, or rather perhaps by +his biographer’s account of it, still holds the field. +Moreover, during the sixty years that have passed +since Arnold’s death scarcely a word has been +said regarding any other masters than the head. +During those years the English universities have +sent into the great schools a large proportion of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_344' name='page_344'></a>344</span> +their most capable graduates as assistant teachers; +and some of the strongest men among these +graduates have never, from various causes, and +often because they preferred to remain laymen, +been raised to the headships of the schools. +Every one knows that a school depends for its +wellbeing and success more largely on the assistants +taken together than it does on the headmaster. +Most people also know that individual +assistant masters are not unfrequently better +scholars, better teachers, and more influential +with the boys than is their official superior. Yet +the assistant masters have remained unhonoured +and unsung in the general chorus of praise of the +great schools which has been resounding over +England for nearly two generations.</p> +<p>Edward Bowen was all his life an assistant +master, and never cared to be anything else. As +he had determined not to take orders in the Church +of England, he was virtually debarred from many +of the chief headmasterships, which are, some few +of them by law, many more by custom, confined +to Anglican clergymen. But even when other +headships to which this condition was not attached +were known to be practically open to his acceptance, +were, indeed, in one or two instances almost +tendered to him, he refused to become a candidate, +preferring his own simple and easy way of life +to the pomp and circumstance which convention +requires a headmaster to maintain. This +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_345' name='page_345'></a>345</span> +abstention, however, did not prevent his eminence +from becoming known to those who had opportunities +of judging. In his later years he would, +I think, have been generally recognised by the +teaching profession as the most brilliant, and in +his own peculiar line the most successful, man +among the schoolmasters of Britain.</p> +<p>He was born on 30th March 1836, of an Irish +family (originally from Wales) holding property +in the county of Mayo. His father was a clergyman +of the Church of England; his mother, +who survived him a few months (dying at the +age of ninety-four) and whom he tended with +watchful care during her years of widowhood, +was partly of Irish, partly of French extraction. +Like his more famous but perhaps not more +remarkable elder brother, Charles Bowen, who +became Lord Bowen, and is remembered as +one of the most acute and subtle judges as +well as one of the most winning personalities +of our time, he had a gaiety, wit, and versatility +which suggested the presence of Celtic blood. +He was educated at Blackheath School, and +afterwards at King’s College in London, whence +he proceeded to Trinity College, Cambridge. +In 1860, after a career at the University, distinguished +both in the way of honours and in +respect of the reputation he won among his +contemporaries, he became a master at Harrow, +and thenceforth remained there, leading an +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_346' name='page_346'></a>346</span> +uneventful and externally a monotonous life, +but one full of unceasing and untiring activity +in play and work. He died on Easter Monday +1901.</p> +<p>Nothing could be less like the traditional +Arnoldine methods of teaching and ruling boys +than Bowen’s method was. The note of those +methods was what used to be called moral +earnestness. Arnold was grave and serious, +distant and awe-inspiring, except perhaps to a +few specially favoured pupils. Bowen was light, +cheerful, vivacious, humorous, familiar, and, above +all things, ingenious and full of variety. His +leading principles were two—that the boy must +at all hazards be interested in the lessons and +that he should be at ease with the teacher.</p> +<p>A Harrow boy once said to his master, +“I don’t know how it is, sir, but if Mr. Bowen +takes a lesson he makes you work twice as hard +as other masters, but you like it twice as much +and you learn far more.” He was the most +unexpected man in conversation that could be +imagined, always giving a new turn to talk by +saying something that seemed remote from the +matter in hand until he presently showed the +connection. So his teaching kept the boys +alert, because its variety was inexhaustible. He +seemed to think that it did not greatly matter +what the lesson was so long as the pupil could be +got to enjoy it. The rules of the school and the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_347' name='page_347'></a>347</span> +requirements of the examinations for which boys +had to be prepared would not have permitted +him to try to any great extent the experiment +of varying subjects to suit individual tastes; but +he was fond of giving lessons in topics outside +the regular course, on astronomy for instance, of +which he had acquired a fair knowledge, and on +recent military history, which he knew wonderfully +well, better probably than any man in England outside +the military profession. When the so-called +“modern side” was established at Harrow, in 1869, +he became head of it, having taken this post, not +from any want of classical taste and learning, +for he was an admirable scholar, and to the +end of his life wrote charming Latin verses, but +because he felt that this line of teaching needed +to be developed in a school which had been formerly +almost wholly classical. For grammatical +minutiæ, for learning rules by heart, and indeed +for the old style of grammar-teaching generally, +he had an unconcealed contempt. He thought it +unkind and wasteful to let a boy go on puzzling +over difficulties of language in an author, and +permitted, under restrictions, the use of English +translations, or (as boys call them) “cribs.” +Teaching was in his view a special gift of +the individual, which depended on the aptitude +for getting hold of the pupil’s mind, and +enlisting his interest in the subject. He +had accordingly no faith in the doctrine that +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_348' name='page_348'></a>348</span> +teaching is a science which can be systematically +studied, or an art in which the apprentice ought to +be systematically trained. When he was summoned +as a witness before the Secondary Education +Commission in 1894 he adhered, under cross-examination, +to this view (so far as it affected +schools like Harrow or Eton), refusing to be +moved by the arguments of those among the +Commissioners who cited the practice of Germany, +where Pädagogik, as they call it, is elaborately +taught in the universities. “I am unable,” he said, +“to conceive any machinery by which the art of +teaching can be given practically to masters. That +art is so much a matter of personal power and experience, +and of various social and moral gifts, +that I cannot conceive a good person made a good +master by merely seeing a class of boys taught, +unless he was allowed to take a real and serious +part in it himself, unless he became a teacher himself. +I can understand that at a primary school you +can learn by going in and hearing a good teacher at +work; but the teaching of a class of older boys is +so different, and has so much of the social element +in it, and it may vary so much, that I should +despair of teaching a young man how to take a +class unless he was a long time with me.... A +master at a large public school is chiefly a moral +and social force; a master is this to a much less +extent at a primary school or in the ordinary day-schools, +the grammar-schools of the country. To +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_349' name='page_349'></a>349</span> +deal with boys when you have them completely +under your control for the whole of every day is +an altogether different thing, and requires different +virtues in the teacher from those that are required +in the case of day-schools.”</p> +<p>Bowen may possibly have been mistaken, even +as regards the teachers in the great public boarding +schools. His view seems to overlook or +disregard that large class of persons who have no +marked natural aptitude for teaching, but are capable +of being, by special instruction and supervised +practice, kneaded and moulded into better teachers +than they would otherwise have grown to be. He +felt so strongly that no one ought to teach without +having a real gift and fondness for teaching that +he thought such difference as training could make +insignificant in comparison with the inborn talent. +Perhaps he generalised too boldly from himself, +for he had an enjoyment of his work, and a conscientiousness +in always putting the very best of +himself into it—how much was conscientiousness +and how much was enjoyment, no one could tell—as +well as a quickness and vivacity which no +study of methods could have improved. As one +of his most eminent colleagues,<a name='FNanchor_0045' id='FNanchor_0045'></a><a href='#Footnote_0045' class='fnanchor'>[54]</a> who was also his +life-long friend, observes: “The humdrum and +routine which must form so large a part of a +teacher’s life were never humdrum or routine to +him, for he put the whole of his abounding +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_350' name='page_350'></a>350</span> +energies into his work, and round its driest details +there played and flickered, as with a lambent +flame, his joyous spirit, finding expression now +perhaps in a striking parallel, now in a startling +paradox, now in a touch of humour, and once +again in a note of pathos.”</p> +<p>The personal influence he exerted on the boys +who lived in his House was quite as remarkable +as his “form-teaching.” Stoicism and honour +were the qualities it was mainly directed to form. +Every boy was expected to show manliness and +endurance, and to utter no complaint. Where +physical health was concerned he was indulgent; +his House was the first which gave the boys meat +at breakfast in addition to tea with bread and +butter. But otherwise the discipline was Spartan, +though not more Spartan than that he prescribed +to himself, and the House was trained to scorn the +slightest approach to luxury. Arm-chairs were +forbidden except to sixth-form boys. A pupil +relates that when Bowen found he was in the habit +of taking two hot baths a week the transgression +was reproved with the words: “Oh boy, that’s +like the later Romans, boy.” His maxims were: +“Take sweet and bitter as sweet and bitter come” +and “Always play the game.” He never preached +to the boys or lectured them; and if he had to +convey a reproof, conveyed it in a single sentence. +But he dwelt upon honour as the foundation of +character, and made every boy feel that he was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_351' name='page_351'></a>351</span> +expected to reach the highest standard of truthfulness, +courage, and duty to the little community +of the House, or the cricket eleven, or the football +team.</p> +<p>Some have begun to think that in English +schools and universities too much time is given to +athletic sports, and that they absorb too largely +the thoughts and interests of the English youth. +Bowen, however, attached the utmost value to +games as a training in character. He used to +descant upon the qualities of discipline, good-fellowship, +good-humour, mutual help, and postponement +of self which they are calculated to +foster. Though some of his friends thought that +his own intense and unabated fondness for these +games—for he played cricket and football up to +the end of his life—might have biassed his judgment, +they could not deny that the games ought +to develop the qualities aforesaid.</p> +<p>“Consider the habit of being in public, the forbearance, +the subordination of the one to the many, +the exercise of judgment, the sense of personal +dignity. Think again of the organising faculty that +our games develop. Where can you get command +and obedience, choice with responsibility, criticism +with discipline, in any degree remotely approaching +that in which our social games supply them? +Think of the partly moral, partly physical side of it, +temper, of course, dignity, courtesy.... When the +match has really begun, there is education, there +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_352' name='page_352'></a>352</span> +is enlargement of horizon, self sinks, the common +good is the only good, the bodily faculties exhilarate +in functional development, and the make-believe +ambition is glorified into a sort of ideality. +Here is boyhood at its best, or very nearly at its +best. <i>Sursum crura!...</i> When you have a lot +of human beings, in highest social union and +perfect organic action, developing the law of their +race and falling in unconsciously with its best +inherited traditions of brotherhood and common +action, you are not far from getting a glimpse of +one side of the highest good. There lives more +soul in honest play, believe me, than in half the +hymn-books.”</p> +<p>These words, taken from a half-serious essay on +Games written for a private society, give some part +of Bowen’s views. The whole essay is well worth +reading.<a name='FNanchor_0046' id='FNanchor_0046'></a><a href='#Footnote_0046' class='fnanchor'>[55]</a> Its arguments do not, however, quite +settle the matter. The playing of games may have, +and indeed ought to have, the excellent results +Bowen claimed for it, and yet it may be doubted +whether the experience of life shows that boys so +brought up do in fact turn out substantially more +good-humoured, unselfish, and fit for the commerce +of the world than others who have lacked this training. +And the further question remains whether the +games are worth their costly candle. That they +occupy a good deal of time at school and at college +is not necessarily an evil, seeing that the time left +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_353' name='page_353'></a>353</span> +for lessons or study is sufficient if well spent. +The real drawback incident to the excessive +devotion games inspire in our days is that they +leave little room in the boy’s or collegian’s mind +either for interest in his studies or for the love +of nature. They fill his thoughts, they divert +his ambition into channels of no permanent value +to his mind or life; they continue to absorb his +interest and form a large part of his reading long +after he has left school or college. Nevertheless, +be these things as they may, the opinion +of a man so able and so experienced as Bowen +was, deserves to be recorded; and his success in +endearing himself to and guiding his boys was +doubtless partly due to the use he made of their +liking for games.</p> +<p>He was never married, so the school became +the sole devotion of his life, and he bequeathed to +it the bulk of his property, directing an area of +land which he had purchased on the top of the +Hill to be always kept as an open space for the +benefit of boys and masters.</p> +<p>It need hardly be said that he loved boys as +he loved teaching. He took them with him in +the holidays on walking tours. He kept up correspondence +with many of his pupils after they +left Harrow, and advised them as occasion rose. +To many of them he remained through life the +model whom they desired to imitate. But he +was very chary of the exercise of influence. “A +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_354' name='page_354'></a>354</span> +boy’s character,” he once wrote, “grows like the +Temple of old, without sound of mallet and +trowel. What we can do is to arrange matters +so as to give Virtue her best chance. We can +make the right choice sometimes a little easier, +we can prevent tendencies from blossoming into +acts, and render pitfalls visible. How much indirectly +and unconsciously we can do, none but +the recording angel knows. ‘You can and you +should,’ said Chiffers,<a name='FNanchor_0047' id='FNanchor_0047'></a><a href='#Footnote_0047' class='fnanchor'>[56]</a> ‘go straight to the heart of +every individual boy.’ Well, a fellow-creature’s +mind is a sacred thing. You may enter into that +arcanum once a year, shoeless. And in the effort +to control the spirit of a pupil, to make one’s own +approval his test and mould him by the stress of +our own presence, in the ambition to do this, the +craving for moral power and visible guiding, the +subtle pride of effective agency, lie some of the +chief temptations of a schoolmaster’s work.”</p> +<p>Such ways and methods as I have endeavoured +to describe are less easy to imitate than those +which belong to the Arnoldine type of schoolmaster. +In Bowen’s gaiety, in his vivacity, in the +humour which interpenetrated everything he said +or did, there was something individual. Teachers +who do not possess a like vivacity, versatility, and +humour cannot hope to apply with like success +the method of familiarity and sympathy. Not +indeed that Bowen stood altogether alone in his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_355' name='page_355'></a>355</span> +use of that method. There were others among +his contemporaries who shared his view, and whose +practice was not dissimilar. He was, however, the +earliest and most brilliant exponent of the view, +so his career may be said to open a new line, and +to mark a new departure in the teacher’s art.</p> +<p>I have mentioned his walking tours. He +was a pedestrian of extraordinary force, rather +tall, but spare and light, swift of foot, and tireless +in his activity. As an undergraduate he +had walked from Cambridge to Oxford, nearly +ninety miles, in twenty-four hours, scarcely halting. +At one time or another he had traversed +on foot all the coast-line and great part of the +inland regions of England. He was an accomplished +Alpine climber. His passion for exercise +of body as well as of mind was so salient a +feature in his character that his friends wondered +how he would be able to support old age. He +was spared the trial, for he was gay and joyous as +ever on the last morning of his life, and he died +in a moment, while mounting his bicycle after a +long ascent, among the lonely forests of Burgundy, +then bursting into leaf under an April sun.</p> +<p>His interest in politics provided him with +a short and strenuous interlude of public action, +which varied the even tenor of his life at Harrow. +At the general election of 1880 he stood as a +candidate for the little borough of Hertford (which +has since been merged in the county) against +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_356' name='page_356'></a>356</span> +Mr. Arthur Balfour, now (1902) First Lord of the +Treasury in England. The pro-Turkish policy +of Lord Beaconsfield, followed by the Afghan +War of 1878, had roused many Liberals who +usually took little part in political action. Bowen +felt the impulse to denounce the conduct of the +Ministry, and went into the contest with his usual +airy suddenness. He had little prospect of success +at such a place, for, like many of the so-called +Academic Liberals of those days, he made the +mistake of standing for a small semi-rural constituency, +overshadowed by a neighbouring magnate, +instead of for a large town, where both his +opinions and his oratory would have been better +appreciated. However, he enjoyed the contest +thoroughly, amusing himself as well as the electors +by his lively and sometimes impassioned speeches, +and he looked back to it as a pleasant episode in +his usually smooth and placid life. He was all his +life a strong Liberal <i>vieille roche</i>, a lover of freedom +and equality as well as of economy in public +finance, a Free Trader, an individualist, an enemy +of all wars and all aggressions, and in later years +growingly indignant at the rapid increase of +military and naval expenditure. He was also, +like the Liberals of 1850-60 in general, a sympathiser +with oppressed nationalities, though this +feeling did not carry him the length of accepting +the policy of Home Rule for Ireland, as +to which he had grave doubts, yet doubts not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_357' name='page_357'></a>357</span> +quite so serious as to involve his separation from +the Liberal party. Twice after 1880 he was on +the point of becoming a candidate for a seat in +the House of Commons, but whether his love for +Harrow would have suffered him to remain in +Parliament had he entered it may be doubted. One +could not even tell whether he was really disappointed +that his political aspirations remained unfulfilled. +Had he given himself to parliamentary life, +his readiness, ingenuity, and wit would have soon +made him valued by his own side, while his sincerity +and engaging manners would have commended +him to both sides alike. His delivery was always +too rapid, and his voice not powerful, yet these +defects would have been forgotten in the interest +which so peculiar a figure must have aroused.</p> +<p>His peace principles contrasted oddly with +his passion for military history, a passion which +prompted many vacation journeys to battlefields +all over Europe, from Salamanca to Austerlitz. +He had followed the campaigns of Napoleon +through Piedmont and Lombardy, through Germany +and Austria, as well as those of Wellington +in Spain and Southern France.<a name='FNanchor_0048' id='FNanchor_0048'></a><a href='#Footnote_0048' class='fnanchor'>[57]</a> This taste is +not uncommon in men of peace. Freeman had +it; J. R. Green and S. R. Gardiner had it; and +the historical works of Sir George Trevelyan +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_358' name='page_358'></a>358</span> +and Dr. Thomas Hodgkin prove that it lives in +those genial breasts also. It was a pleasure to +be led over a battlefield by Bowen, for he had +a good eye for ground, he knew the movements +of the armies down to the smallest detail, and he +could explain with perfect lucidity the positions of +the combatants and the tactical moves in the game.</p> +<p>Twice only did he come across actual fighting, +once at Düppel in 1864, during the Schleswig-Holstein +war, and again in Paris during the siege +of the Communards by the forces that obeyed +Thiers and the Assembly sitting at Versailles. +He maintained that the Commune had been unfairly +judged by Englishmen, and wrote a singularly +interesting description of what he saw while +risking his life in the beleaguered city. There +was in him a great spirit of adventure, though the +circumstances of his life gave it little scope.</p> +<p>Travel was one of his chief pleasures, but it +was, if possible, a still greater pleasure to his +fellow-travellers, for he was the most agreeable +of companions, fertile in suggestion, candid in +discussion, swift in decision. He cared nothing +for luxury and very little for comfort; he was +absolutely unselfish and imperturbably good-humoured; +he could get enjoyment out of the +smallest incidents of travel, and his curiosity to +see the surface of the earth as well as the cities +of men was inexhaustible. He loved the unexpected, +and if one had written proposing an +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_359' name='page_359'></a>359</span> +expedition to explore Tibet, he would have +telegraphed back, “Start to-night: do we meet +Charing Cross or Victoria?”</p> +<p>I have dwelt on Bowen’s gifts and methods +as a teacher, because teaching was the joy and +the business of his life, and because he showed +a new way in which boys might be stimulated +and guided. But he was a great deal besides +a teacher, just as his brother Charles was a +great deal besides a lawyer. Both had talents +for literature of a very high order. Charles +published a verse translation of Virgil’s <i>Eclogues</i> +and the first six books of the <i>Æneid</i>, full of +ingenuity and refinement, as well as of fine poetic +taste. Edward’s vein expressed itself in the +writing of songs. His school songs, composed +for the Harrow boys, became immensely popular +with them, and their use at school celebrations +of various kinds has passed from Harrow to +the other great schools of England, even +to some of the larger girls’ schools. The +songs are unique in their fanciful ingenuity and +humorous extravagance, full of a boyish joy in +life, in the exertion of physical strength, in the +mimic strife of games, yet with an occasional +touch of sadness, like the shadow of a passing +cloud as it falls on the cricket field over which +the shouts of the players are ringing. The metres +are various: all show rhythmical skill, and in all +the verse has a swing which makes it singularly +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_360' name='page_360'></a>360</span> +effective when sung by a mass of voices. Most +of the songs are dedicated to cricket or football, +but a few are serious, and two or three of these +have a beauty of thought and perfection of form +which make the reader ask why a poetic gift so +true and so delicate should have been rarely used. +These songs were the work of his middle or later +years, and he never wrote except when the impulse +came upon him. The stream ran pure but +it ran seldom. In early days he had been for a +while, like many other brilliant young University +men of his time, a contributor to the <i>Saturday +Review</i>. (There surely never was a journal which +enlisted so much and such varied literary talent +as the <i>Saturday</i> did between 1855 and 1863.) +Bowen’s articles were, like his elder brother’s, +extremely witty. In later life he could seldom +be induced to write, having fallen out of the habit, +and being, indeed, too busy to carry on any large +piece of work; but the occasional papers on educational +subjects he produced showed no decline in +his vivacity or in the abundance of his humour. +Those who knew the range and the resources +of his mind sometimes regretted that he would do +nothing to let the world know them. But he +was, to a degree most unusual among men of real +power, absolutely indifferent, not only to fame, but +to opportunities for exercising power or influence.</p> +<p>The stoicism which he sought to form in his +pupils was inculcated by his own example. It +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_361' name='page_361'></a>361</span> +was a genial and cheerful stoicism, which checked +neither his affection for them nor his brightness +in society, and which permitted him to draw as +much enjoyment from small things as most +people can from great ones. But if he had +the gaiety of an Irishman, he had a double portion +of English reserve. He never gave expression +in words to his emotions. He never seemed +either elated or depressed. He never lost his +temper and never seemed to be curbing it. His +tastes and way of life were simple to the verge of +austerity; nor did he appear to desire anything +more than what he had obtained.</p> +<p>It is natural—possibly foolish, yet almost +inevitable—that those who perceive in a friend +the presence of rare and brilliant gifts should +desire that his gifts should not only be turned +to full account for the world’s benefit, but +should become so known and appreciated as +to make others admire and value what they +admire and value. When such a man prefers to +live his life in his own way, and do the plain +duties that lie near him, with no thought of +anything further, they feel, though they may try +to repress, a kind of disappointment, as though +greatness or virtue had missed its mark because +known to few besides themselves. Yet there is +a sense in which that friend is most our own who +has least belonged to the world, who has least +cared for what the world has to offer, who has +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_362' name='page_362'></a>362</span> +chosen the simplest and purest pleasures, who +has rendered the service that his way of life +required with no longing for any wider theatre +or any applause to be there won. Is there indeed +anything more beautiful than a life of quiet self-sufficing +yet beneficent serenity, such as the +ancient philosophers inculcated, a life which is +now more rarely than ever led by men of shining +gifts, because the inducements to bring such gifts +into the dusty thoroughfares of the world have +grown more numerous? Bowen had the best +equipment for a philosopher. He knew the things +that gave him pleasure, and sought no others. He +knew what he could do well. He followed his +own bent. His desires were few, and he could +gratify them all. He had made life exactly what +he wished it to be. Intensely as he enjoyed +travel, he never uttered a note of regret when the +beginning of a Harrow school term stopped a +journey at its most interesting point, so dearly +did he love his boys. What more can we desire +for our friends than this—that in remembering +them there should be nothing to regret, that all +who came under their influence should feel themselves +for ever thereafter the better for that influence, +that a happy and peaceful life should be +crowned by a sudden and painless death?</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_363' name='page_363'></a>363</span> +<a name='EDWIN_LAWRENCE_GODKIN' id='EDWIN_LAWRENCE_GODKIN'></a> +<h2>EDWIN LAWRENCE GODKIN</h2> +</div> +<p>As with the progress of science new arts emerge +and new occupations and trades are created, so +with the progress of society professions previously +unknown arise, evolve new types of +intellectual excellence, and supply a new theatre +for the display of peculiar and exceptional gifts. +Such a profession, such a type, and the type +which is perhaps most specially characteristic of +our times, is that of the Editor. It scarcely +existed before the French Revolution, and is, as +now fully developed, a product of the last eighty +years. Various are its forms. There is the +Business Editor, who runs his newspaper as a +great commercial undertaking, and may neither +care for politics nor attach himself to any political +party. America still recollects the familiar +example set by James Gordon Bennett, the +founder of the <i>New York Herald</i>. There is +the Selective Editor, who may never pen a line, +but shows his skill in gathering an able staff +round him, and in allotting to each of them the +work he can do best. Such an one was John +Douglas Cook, a man of slender cultivation +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_364' name='page_364'></a>364</span> +and few intellectual interests, but still remembered +in England by those who forty years +ago knew the staff of the <i>Saturday Review</i>, +then in its brilliant prime, as possessed of an +extraordinary instinct for the topics which caught +the public taste, and for the persons capable of +handling those topics. John T. Delane, of the +<i>Times</i>, had the same gift, with talents and +knowledge far surpassing Cook’s. A third and +usually more interesting form is found in the +Editor who is himself an able writer, and who +imparts his own individuality to the journal he +directs. Such an one was Horace Greeley, +who, in the days before the War of Secession, +made the <i>New York Tribune</i> a power in +America. Such another, of finer natural quality, +was Michael Katkoff, who in his short career +did much to create and to develop the spirit +of nationality and imperialism in Russia thirty +years ago.</p> +<p>It was to this third form of the editorial profession +that Mr. Godkin belonged. He is the +most remarkable example of it that has appeared +in our time—perhaps, indeed, in any time since +the profession rose to importance; and all the +more remarkable because he was never, like +Greeley or Katkoff, the exponent of any widespread +sentiment or potent movement, but was +frequently in opposition to the feeling for the +moment dominant.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_365' name='page_365'></a>365</span></div> +<p>Edwin Lawrence Godkin, the son of a Protestant +clergyman and author, was born in the +county of Wicklow, in Ireland, in 1831. He +was educated at Queen’s College, Belfast, read +for a short time for the English bar, but drifted +into journalism by accepting the post of correspondent +to the London <i>Daily News</i> during the +Crimean War in 1853-54. The horror of war which +he retained through his life was due to the glimpse +of it he had in the Crimea. Soon afterwards he +went to America, was admitted to the bar in New +York, but never practised, spent some months in +travelling through the Southern States on horseback, +learning thereby what slavery was, and +what its economic and social consequences, was +for two or three years a writer on the <i>New York +Times</i>, and ultimately, in 1865, established in +New York a weekly journal called the <i>Nation</i>. +This he continued to edit, writing most of it +himself, till 1881, when he accepted the editorship +of the <i>New York Evening Post</i>, an old and +respectable paper, but with no very large circulation. +The <i>Nation</i> continued to appear, but became +practically a weekly edition of the <i>Evening +Post</i>, or rather, as some one said, the <i>Evening +Post</i> became a daily edition of the <i>Nation</i>, for +the tone and spirit that had characterised the +<i>Nation</i> now pervaded the <i>Post</i>. In 1900 failing +health compelled him to retire from active work, +and in May 1902 he died in England. Journalism +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_366' name='page_366'></a>366</span> +left him little leisure for any other kind of literary +production; but he wrote in early life a short +history of Hungary; and a number of articles +which he had in later years contributed to the +<i>Nation</i> or to magazines were collected and published +in three volumes between 1895 and 1900. +They are clear and wise articles, specially instructive +where they deal with the most recent +aspects of democracy. But as they convey a less +than adequate impression of the peculiar qualities +which established his fame, I pass on to the work +by which he will be remembered, his work as a +weekly and daily public writer.</p> +<p>He was well equipped for this career by +considerable experience of the world, by large +reading, for though not a learned man, he had +assimilated a great deal of knowledge on economical +and historical subjects, and by a stock +of positive principles which he saw clearly and +held coherently. In philosophy and economics +he was a Utilitarian of the school of J. S. +Mill, and in politics what used to be called a +philosophical Radical, a Radical of the less +extreme type, free from sentiment and from +prejudices, but equally free from any desire to +destroy for the sake of destroying. Like the +other Utilitarians of those days, he was a +moderate optimist, expecting the world to grow +better steadily, though not swiftly; and he went +to America in the belief that he should there find +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_367' name='page_367'></a>367</span> +more progress secured, and more of further progress +in prospect, than any European country +could show. It was the land of promise, in +which all the forces making for good on which +the school of Mill relied were to be found at +work, hampered only by the presence of slavery. +I note this fact, because it shows that the pessimism +of Mr. Godkin’s later years was not due to a +naturally querulous or despondent temperament.</p> +<p>So too was his mind admirably fitted for the +career he had chosen. It was logical, penetrating, +systematic, yet it was also quick and +nimble. His views were definite, not to say +dogmatic, and as they were confidently held, +so too they were confidently expressed. He +never struck a doubtful note. He never slurred +over a difficulty, nor sought, when he knew +himself ignorant, to cover up his ignorance. +Imagination was kept well in hand, for his constant +aim was to get at and deal with the vital +facts of every case. If he was not original in the +way of thinking out doctrines distinctively his +own, nor in respect of any exuberance of ideas +bubbling up in the course of discussion, there was +fertility as well as freshness in his application of +principles to current questions, and in the illustrations +by which he enforced his arguments.</p> +<p>As his thinking was exact, so his style was +clear-cut and trenchant. Even when he was +writing most swiftly, it never sank below a high +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_368' name='page_368'></a>368</span> +level of form and finish. Every word had its +use and every sentence told. There was no +doubt about his meaning, and just as little about +the strength of his convictions. He had a gift +for terse vivacious paragraphs commenting on +some event of the day or summing up the effect of +a speech or a debate. The touch was equally +light and firm. But if the manner was brisk, the +matter was solid: you admired the keenness of +the insight and the weight of the judgment just +as much as the brightness of the style. Much +of the brightness lay in the humour. That is a +plant which blossoms so much more profusely on +Transatlantic soil that English readers of the +<i>Nation</i> had usually a start of surprise when told +that this most humorous of American journalists +was not an American at all but a European, +and indeed a European who never became +thoroughly Americanised. It was humour of +a pungent and sarcastic quality, usually directed +to the detection of tricks or the exposure of +shams, but it was eminently mirth-provoking and +never malicious. Frequently it was ironical, and +the irony sometimes so fine as to be mistaken +for seriousness.</p> +<p>The <i>Nation</i> was from its very first numbers +so full of force, keenness, and knowledge, and so +unusually well written, that it made its way rapidly +among the educated classes of the Eastern States. +It soon became a power, but a power of a new +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_369' name='page_369'></a>369</span> +kind. Mr. Godkin wanted most of the talents +or interests of the ordinary journalist. He +gave no thought to the organisation of the +paper as a business undertaking. He scarcely +heeded circulation, either when his livelihood +depended upon the <i>Nation</i> of which he was the +chief owner, or when he was associated with +others in the ownership of the <i>Evening Post</i>. +He refused to allow any news he disapproved, +including all scandal and all society gossip, to +appear. He was prepared at any moment to +incur unpopularity from his subscribers, or even +to offend one half of his advertisers. He took +no pains to get news before other journals, and +cared nothing for those “beats” and “scoops” in +which the soul of the normal newspaper man +finds a legitimate source of pride. He was not +there, he would have said, to please either advertisers +or subscribers, but to tell the American +people the truths they needed to hear, and if +those truths were distasteful, so much the more +needful was it to proclaim them. He was absolutely +independent not only of all personal but +of all party ties. A public man was never +either praised or suffered to escape censure because +he was a private acquaintance. He once +told me that the being obliged to censure those +with whom he stood in personal relations was +the least agreeable feature of his profession. +Whether an act was done by the Republicans +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_370' name='page_370'></a>370</span> +or by the Democrats made no difference to his +judgment, or to the severity with which his +judgment was expressed. His distrust of Mr. +James G. Blaine had led him to support Mr. +Cleveland at the election of 1884, and he continued +to give a general approval to the latter +statesman during both his presidential terms. But +when Mr. Cleveland’s Venezuelan message with +its menaces to England appeared in December +1895, Mr. Godkin vehemently denounced it, as +indeed he had frequently before blamed particular +acts of the Cleveland administrations. He sometimes +voted for the Republicans, sometimes for +the Democrats, according to the merits of the +transitory issue or the particular candidate, but +after 1884 no one could have called him either a +Republican or a Democrat.</p> +<p>Independence of party is less rare among +American than among European newspapers; +but courage such as Godkin’s is rare everywhere. +The editor of a century ago had in most +countries to fear press censorship, or the law of +political libel, or the frowns of the great. The +modern editor, delivered from these risks, is +exposed to the more insidious temptations of +financial influence, of social pressure, of the +fear of injuring the business interests of the +paper, which are now sometimes enormous. +Godkin’s conscientiousness and pride made him +equally indifferent to influence and to threats. As +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_371' name='page_371'></a>371</span> +some one said, you might as well have tried to +frighten the east wind. Clear, prompt, and self-confident, +judging everything by a high standard +of honour and public spirit, he distributed censure +with no regard either to the official position +or to the party affiliations of politicians. The +“Weekly Day of Judgment” was the title +bestowed upon the <i>Nation</i> by Charles Dudley +Warner, who himself admired it. As Godkin +expected—or at least demanded—righteousness +from every one, he was more a terror to evildoers +than a praise to them that do well, and +the fact that, having no private ends to serve, +he thought only of truth and the public interest, +made him all the more stringent. Because +he was, and found it easy to be, fearless and independent, +he scarcely allowed enough for the +timidity of others, and sometimes chastised the +weak as sternly as the wicked. An editor who +smites all the self-seekers and all the time-servers +whom he thinks worth smiting, is sure to become +a target for many arrows. But as Godkin +was an equally caustic critic of the sentimental +vagaries or economic heresies of well-meaning +men or sections of opinion, he incurred hostility +from quarters where the desire for honest administration +and the purity of public life was hardly +less strong than in the pages of the <i>Nation</i> itself. +Though he took no personal part in politics, never +appeared on platforms nor in any way put himself +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_372' name='page_372'></a>372</span> +forward, his paper was so markedly himself that +people talked of it as him. It was not “the +<i>Nation</i> says” or “the <i>Post</i> says,” but “Godkin +says.” Even his foreign birth was charged +against him—a rare charge in a country so +tolerant and catholic as the United States, where +every office except that of President is open to +newcomers as freely as to the native born.</p> +<p>He was called “un-American,” and I have +heard men who admired and read the <i>Nation</i> +nevertheless complain that they did not want +“to be taught by a European how to run this +Republic.” True it is that he did not see things +or write about them quite as an American would +have done. But was this altogether a misfortune? +The Italian cities of the Middle Ages used to call +in a man of character and mark from some other +place and make him Podestá just because he stood +outside the family ties and the factions of the +city. Godkin’s foreign education gave him detachment +and perspective. It never reduced his +ardour to see administration and public life in +America made worthy of the greatness of the +American people.</p> +<p>No journal could have maintained its circulation +and extended its influence in the face of so +much hostility except by commanding merits. +The merits of the <i>Nation</i> were incontestable. +It was the best weekly not only in America +but in the world. The editorials were models +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_373' name='page_373'></a>373</span> +of style. The book reviews, many of them +in earlier days also written by Godkin himself, +were finished in point of form, and, when not +his own, came from the ablest specialist hands +in the country. The “current notes” of progress +in such subjects as geography, natural history, +and archæology were instructive and accurate. +So it was that people had to read the <i>Nation</i> +whether they liked it or not. It could not be +ignored. It was a necessity even where it was a +terror.</p> +<p>Yet neither the force of his reasoning nor +the brilliance of his style would have secured +Godkin’s influence but for two other elements of +strength he possessed. One was the universal +belief in his disinterestedness and sincerity. +He was often charged with prejudice or bitterness, +but never with any sinister motive; enemies +no less than friends respected him. The +other was his humour. An austere moralist +who is brimful of fun is rare in any country. +Relishing humour more than does any other +people, the Americans could not be seriously +angry with a man who gave them so abundant a +feast.</p> +<p>To trace the course he took in the politics of +the United States since 1860 would almost be +to outline the history of forty years, for there +was no great issue in the discussion of which +he did not bear a part. He was a strong +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_374' name='page_374'></a>374</span> +supporter of the Northern cause during the War +of Secession, and by his letters to the London +<i>Daily News</i> did something to enlighten English +readers. When the problems of reconstruction +emerged after the war, he suggested lines of +action more moderate than those followed by +the Republican leaders, and during many subsequent +years denounced the “carpet-baggers,” and +advocated the policy of restoring self-government +to the Southern States and withdrawing +Federal troops. Incensed at the corruption of +some of the men who surrounded President +Grant during his first term, he opposed Grant’s +re-election, as did nearly all the reformers of +those days. By this time he had begun to attack +the “spoils system,” and to demand a reform of +the civil service, and he had also become engaged +in that campaign against the Tammany organisation +in New York City which he maintained +with unabated energy till the end of his editorial +career.<a name='FNanchor_0049' id='FNanchor_0049'></a><a href='#Footnote_0049' class='fnanchor'>[58]</a> In 1884 he led the opposition to the +candidacy of Mr. Blaine for President, and it was +mainly the persistency with which the <i>Evening +Post</i> set forth the accusations brought against +that statesman that secured his defeat in New +York State, and therewith his defeat in the +election. It was on this occasion that the nickname +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_375' name='page_375'></a>375</span> +of Mugwump<a name='FNanchor_0050' id='FNanchor_0050'></a><a href='#Footnote_0050' class='fnanchor'>[59]</a> was first applied to Mr. +Godkin by the ablest of his antagonists in the +press, Mr. Dana of the <i>New York Sun</i>, a title +before long extended to the Independents whom +the <i>Post</i> led, and who constituted, during the +next ten or twelve years, a section of opinion +important, if not by its numbers, yet by the +intellectual and moral weight of the men who +composed it. When currency questions became +prominent, Mr. Godkin was a strong opponent +of bimetallism and of “silverism” in all its +forms, and a not less strenuous opponent of all +socialistic theories and movements. It need +hardly be added that he had always been an +upholder of the principles of Free Trade. Like +a sound Cobdenite, he was an advocate of +peace, and disliked territorial extension. He +opposed President Grant’s scheme for the acquisition +of San Domingo, as he afterwards opposed +the annexation of Hawaii. His close study of +Irish history, and his old faith in the principle of +nationality, had made him a strenuous advocate of +Home Rule for Ireland. But no one was farther +than he from sharing the feelings of the American +Irish towards England. He condemned the +threats addressed in 1895 to Great Britain over +the Venezuela question; and glad as he was to +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_376' name='page_376'></a>376</span> +see that question settled by England’s acceptance +of an arbitration which she had previously +denied the right of the United States to +demand, he held that England must beware of +yielding too readily to pressure from the United +States, because such compliance would encourage +that aggressive spirit in the latter whose consequences +for both countries he feared. Never, +perhaps, did he incur so much obloquy as in +defending, almost single-handed, the British position +in the Venezuelan affair. The attacks made +all over the country on the <i>Evening Post</i> were, +he used to say, like storms of hail lashing against +his windows. At the very end of his career, he +resisted the war with Spain and the annexation +of the Philippine Islands, deeming the acquisition +of trans-Oceanic territories, inhabited by +inferior races, a dangerous new departure, opposed +to the traditions of the Fathers of the Republic, +and inconsistent with the principles on which the +Republic was founded. No public writer has left +a more consistent record.</p> +<p>In private life Mr. Godkin was a faithful +friend and a charming companion, genial as well +as witty, considerate of others, and liked no less +than admired by his staff on the <i>Evening Post</i>, +free from cynicism, and more indulgent in his +views of human nature than might have been +gathered from his public utterances. He never +despaired of democratic government, yet his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_377' name='page_377'></a>377</span> +spirits had been damped by the faint fulfilment +of those hopes for the progress of free nations, +and especially of the United States, which +had illumined his youth. The slow advance +of economic truths, the evils produced by +the increase of wealth, the growth of what he +called “chromo-civilisation,” the indifference of +the rich and educated to politics, the want of +nerve among politicians, the excitability of the +masses, the tenacity with which corruption and +misgovernment held their ground, in spite of +repeated exposures, in cities like New York, +Philadelphia, and Chicago—all these things had +so sunk into his soul that it became hard to induce +him to look at the other side, and to appreciate +the splendid recuperative forces which are +at work in America. Thus his friends were +driven to that melancholy form of comfort which +consists in pointing out that other countries are +no better. They argued that England in particular, +to which he had continued to look as the +home of political morality and enlightened State +wisdom, was suffering from evils, not indeed the +same as those which in his judgment afflicted +America, but equally serious. They bade him +remember that moral progress is not continuous, +but subject to ebbs of reaction, and that America +is a country of which one should never despair, +because in it evils have often before worked out +their cure. He did regretfully own, after his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_378' name='page_378'></a>378</span> +latest visits to Europe, that England had sadly +declined from the England of his earlier days, +and he admitted that the clouds under which his +own path had latterly lain might after a time be +scattered by a burst of sunshine; but his hopes for +the near future of America were not brightened by +these reflections. Sometimes he seemed to feel—though +of his own work he never spoke—as +though he had laboured in vain for forty years.</p> +<p>If he so thought, he did his work far less than +justice. It had told powerfully upon the United +States, and that in more than one way. Though +the circulation of the <i>Nation</i> was never large, it +was read by the two classes which in America have +most to do with forming political and economic +opinion—I mean editors and University teachers. +(The Universities and Colleges, be it remembered, +are far more numerous, relatively to the population, +in America than in England, and a more +important factor in the thought of the country.) +From the editors and the professors Mr. Godkin’s +views filtered down into the educated class generally, +and affected its opinion. He instructed and +stimulated the men who instructed and stimulated +the rest of the people. To those young men +in particular who thought about public affairs and +were preparing themselves to serve their country, +his articles were an inspiration. The great hope +for American democracy to-day lies in the growing +zeal and the ripened intelligence with which the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_379' name='page_379'></a>379</span> +generation now come to manhood has begun to +throw itself into public work. Many influences +have contributed to this result, and Mr. Godkin’s +has been among the most potent.</p> +<p>Nor was his example less beneficial to the +profession of journalism. There has always +been a profusion of talent in the American press, +talent more alert and versatile than is to be found +in the press of any European country. But in +1865 there were three things which the United +States lacked. Literary criticism did not maintain +a high standard, nor duly distinguish thorough from +flashy or superficial performances. Party spirit was +so strong and so pervasive that journalists were +content to denounce or to extol, and seldom subjected +the character of men or measures to a +searching and impartial examination. There was +too much sentimentalism in politics, with too little +reference of current questions to underlying principles, +too little effort to get down to what Americans +call the “hard pan” of facts. In all these +respects the last forty years have witnessed prodigious +advances; and, so far as the press is +concerned—for much has been due to the Universities +and to the growth of a literary class—Mr. +Godkin’s writings largely contributed to the +progress made. His finished criticism, his exact +method, his incisive handling of economic problems, +his complete detachment from party, helped +to form a new school of journalists, as the example +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_380' name='page_380'></a>380</span> +he set of a serious and lofty conception of an editor’s +duties helped to add dignity to the position. He +had not that disposition to enthrone the press +which made a great English newspaper once claim +for itself that it discharged in the modern world the +functions of the mediæval Church. But he brought +to his work as an anonymous writer a sense of responsibility +and a zeal for the welfare of his country +which no minister of State could have surpassed.</p> +<p>His friends may sometimes have wished that +he had more fully recognised the worth of sentiment +as a motive power in politics, that he had +more frequently tried to persuade as well as to convince, +that he had given more credit for partial +instalments of honest service and for a virtue less +than perfect, that he had dealt more leniently +with the faults of the good and the follies of the +wise. Defects in these respects were the almost +inevitable defects of his admirable qualities, of +his passion for truth, his hatred of wrong and +injustice, his clear vision, his indomitable spirit.</p> +<p>The lesson of his editorial career is a lesson +not for America only. Among the dangers that +beset democratic communities, none are greater +than the efforts of wealth to control, not only +electors and legislators, but also the organs of +public opinion, and the disposition of statesmen +and journalists to defer to and flatter the majority, +adopting the sentiment dominant at the moment, +and telling the people that its voice is the voice +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_381' name='page_381'></a>381</span> +of God. Mr. Godkin was not only inaccessible +to the lures of wealth—the same may happily be +still said of many of his craft-brethren—he was +just as little accessible to the fear of popular +displeasure. Nothing more incensed him than +to see a statesman or an editor with his “ear to +the ground” (to use an American phrase), seeking +to catch the sound of the coming crowd. To +him, the less popular a view was, so much the +more did it need to be well weighed and, if +approved, to be strenuously and incessantly +preached. Democracies will always have demagogues +ready to feed their vanity and stir their +passions and exaggerate the feeling of the +moment. What they need is men who will swim +against the stream, will tell them their faults, will +urge an argument all the more forcibly because it +is unwelcome. Such an one was Edwin Godkin. +Since the death of Abraham Lincoln, America +has been generally more influenced by her writers, +preachers, and thinkers than by her statesmen. +In the list of those who have during the last forty +years influenced her for good and helped by their +pens to make her history, a list illustrated by such +names as those of R. W. Emerson and Phillips +Brooks and James Russell Lowell, his name +will find its place and receive its well-earned +meed of honour.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_382' name='page_382'></a>382</span> +<a name='LORD_ACTON' id='LORD_ACTON'></a> +<h2>LORD ACTON</h2> +</div> +<p>When Lord Acton died on 19th June 1902, at +Tegern See in Bavaria, England lost the most truly +cosmopolitan of her children, and Europe lost one +who was, by universal consent, in the foremost rank +of her men of learning. He belonged to an old +Roman Catholic family of Shropshire, a branch +of which had gone to Southern Italy, where his +grandfather, General Acton, had been chief +minister of the King of Naples in the great +war, at the time when the Bourbon dynasty +maintained itself in Sicily by the help of +the British fleet, while all Italy lay under the +heel of Napoleon. His father, Sir Ferdinand +Acton, married a German lady, heiress of the +ancient and famous house of Dalberg, one of the +great families of the middle Rhineland; so John +Edward Emerich Dalberg-Acton was born half a +German, and connected by blood with the highest +aristocracy of Germany. He was educated at +Oscott, one of the two chief Roman Catholic +colleges of England, under Dr. Wiseman, afterwards +Archbishop of Westminster and Cardinal; +but the most powerful influence on the development +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_383' name='page_383'></a>383</span> +of his mind and principles came from +that glory of Catholic learning, a beautiful +soul as well as a capacious intellect, Dr. von +Döllinger, with whom Acton studied during some +years at Munich. He sat for a short time in +the House of Commons as member for Carlow +(1859); and was afterwards elected for Bridgnorth +(1865), but lost his seat (which he had +gained by one vote only) on a scrutiny. In +those days it was not easy for a Roman Catholic +to find an English constituency, so in 1869 Mr. +Gladstone procured his elevation to the peerage. +He made a successful speech in the House +of Lords in 1893, but took no prominent part in +parliamentary life in either House, feeling himself +too much of a student, and looking at current +questions from a point of view unlike that of +English politicians. Neither as a philosopher, +nor as a historian, nor as a product of German +training, could he find either Lords or Commons +a congenial audience. When he was asked soon +after he entered Parliament why he did not speak, +he answered that he agreed with nobody and nobody +agreed with him. But since he regarded politics as +history in the course of making under his eyes, he +continued to be all his life keenly interested in +public affairs, watching and judging every move +in the game. Mr. Gladstone, whose trusted +friend he had been for many years, was believed +to have on one occasion wished to place him in an +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_384' name='page_384'></a>384</span> +important office; but political exigencies made +this impossible, and the only public post he ever +held was that of Lord-in-Waiting in the Ministry +of 1892. In this capacity he was brought into +frequent contact with Queen Victoria, who felt +the warmest respect and admiration for him. He +was one of the very few persons surrounding her +who was familiar with most of the courts of Continental +Europe, and could discuss with her from +direct knowledge the men who figured in those +courts. At Windsor he spent in the library of +the Castle all the time during which he was not +required to be in actual attendance on the Queen, +a singular phenomenon among Lords-in-Waiting.</p> +<p>Unlike most English Roman Catholics, he was +a strong Liberal, a Liberal of that orthodox type, +individualist, free-trade, and peace-loving, which +prevailed from 1846 till 1885. He was also a +convinced Home Ruler, and had, indeed, adopted +the principle of Home Rule for Ireland long +before Mr. Gladstone himself was converted to it. +His faith in that principle rested on the value he +attached to self-government as a means of training +and developing the political aptitudes of a +people, and to the recognition of national sentiment, +which he held to be, like other natural forces, +useful when guided but formidable when repressed. +So too his Liberalism was based on the love of +freedom for its own sake, joined to the conviction +that freedom is the best foundation for the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_385' name='page_385'></a>385</span> +stability of a constitution and the happiness of +a people. Reliance on the power of freedom +was, he used to say, one of the broadest of all the +lessons he had learned from history. He applied +it in ecclesiastical as well as in political affairs. +At the time of the Vatican Council of 1870 he +was, though a layman, prominent among those +who constituted the opposition maintained by the +Liberal section of the Roman Catholic Church +to the affirmation of the dogma of papal infallibility. +His full and accurate knowledge of ecclesiastical +history was placed at the disposal of the +prelates, such as Archbishop Dupanloup, Bishop +Strossmayer, and Archbishop Conolly (of Halifax, +Nova Scotia), who combated the Ultramontane +party in the animated and protracted debates +which illumined that Œcumenical Council. One, +at least, of the treatises, and many of the letters +in the press which the Council called forth were +written either by him or from materials which he +supplied, and he was recognised by the Ultramontanes, +and in particular by Archbishop Manning, +as being, along with Döllinger, the most +formidable of their opponents behind the scenes. +As every one knows, the Infallibilists triumphed, +and the schism which led to the formation of the +Old Catholic Church in Germany and Switzerland +was the result. Döllinger was excommunicated; +but against Lord Acton no action was +taken, and he remained all his life a faithful +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_386' name='page_386'></a>386</span> +member of the Roman communion, while adhering +to the views he had advocated in 1870.</p> +<p>With this close hold upon practical life and +this constant interest in the politics of the world, +especially of England and the United States, no +one could be less like that cloistered student who +is commonly taken as the typical man of learning. +But Lord Acton was a miracle of learning. Of +the sciences of nature and their practical applications +in the arts he had indeed no more knowledge +than any cultivated man of the world is +expected to possess. But of all the so-called +“human subjects” his mastery was unequalled. +Learning was the business of his life. He was +gifted with a singularly tenacious memory. His +industry was untiring. Wherever he was—in +London, at Cannes in winter, at Tegern See in +summer, at Windsor or Osborne with the Queen, +latterly (till his health failed) at Cambridge during +the University terms—he never worked less +than eight hours a day. Yet, even after making +every allowance for his memory and his industry, +his friends stood amazed at the range and exactness +of his knowledge. It was as various as it was +profound, and much of it bore on recondite matters +which few men study to-day. Though less minute +where it touched the ancient and the early mediæval +world than as respected more recent times, +it might be said to cover the whole field of history, +both civil and ecclesiastical, and became wonderfully +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_387' name='page_387'></a>387</span> +full and exact when it reached the Renaissance and +Reformation periods. It included not only the +older theology, but modern Biblical criticism. It +included metaphysics; and not only metaphysics in +the more special sense, but the abstract side of +economics and that philosophy of law on which +the Germans set so much store. Most of the +prominent figures who have during the last +half-century led the march of inquiry in these +subjects, men like Ranke and Fustel de +Coulanges in history, Wilhelm Roscher in +economic science, Adolf Harnack in theology, +were his personal friends, and he could meet +them as an equal on their own ground. On +one occasion I had invited to meet him at dinner +the late Dr. (afterwards Bishop) Creighton, who +was then writing his <i>History of the Popes</i>, and the +late Professor Robertson Smith, the most eminent +Hebrew and Arabic scholar in Britain. The conversation +turned first upon the times of Pope Leo +the Tenth, and then upon recent controversies +regarding the dates of the books of the Old +Testament, and it soon appeared that Lord +Acton knew as much about the former as Dr. +Creighton, and as much about the latter as +Robertson Smith. The constitutional history of +the United States is a topic far removed from +those philosophical and ecclesiastical or theological +lines of inquiry to which most of his time had +been given; yet he knew it more thoroughly than +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_388' name='page_388'></a>388</span> +any other living European, at least in England +and France, for of the Germans I will not venture +to speak, and he continued to read most of the +books of importance dealing with it which from +time to time were published. So, indeed, he +kept abreast of nearly all the literature of possible +utility bearing on history (especially ecclesiastical +history) and political theory that appeared in +Europe or America, reading much which his less +diligent or less eager friends thought scarcely +worthy of his perusal. And it need hardly be +said that his friends found him an invaluable guide +to the literature of any subject. In the sphere +of history more especially, one might safely +assume that a book which he did not know was +not worth knowing, while he was often able to +indicate, as being the right book to consult, some +work of which the person who consulted him, +albeit not unversed in the subject, had never +heard. He had at one time four libraries, the +largest at his family seat, Aldenham in Shropshire, +others at Tegern See, at Cannes, and in +London; and he could usually tell in which of +these the particular book he named was to be +found. Unlike most men who value their +libraries, he was fond of lending books, and +would sometimes put a friend to shame by asking +some weeks afterwards what the latter thought +of the volumes he had almost forced on the +borrower, and which the borrower had not found +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_389' name='page_389'></a>389</span> +time to read. After saying this, I need scarcely +add that he was not a book collector in the usual +sense of the word. He did not care for rare +editions, and still less did he care about bindings.</p> +<p>His Aldenham library was itself a monument +of learning and industry.<a name='FNanchor_0051' id='FNanchor_0051'></a><a href='#Footnote_0051' class='fnanchor'>[60]</a> In forming it he sought +to bring together the books needed for tracing +and elucidating the growth of formative ideas +and of institutions in the sphere of ecclesiastical +and civil polity, and to attain this he made it +include not only all the best treatises handling +these large and complex subjects, but a mass of +original records bearing as well on the local +histories of the cities and provinces of such +countries as Italy and France as on the general +history of the great European States and of the +Church. This magnificent design he accomplished +by his own efforts before he was forty. What was +still more surprising, he had found time to use the +books. Nearly all of them show by notes pencilled +or marks placed in them that he had read some +part of them, and knew (so far as was needed for +his purpose) their contents.</p> +<p>Vast as his stores of knowledge were, they +were opened only to his few intimate friends. +It was not merely that he, as Tennyson said of +Edmund Lushington, “bore all that weight of +learning lightly, like a flower.” No one could +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_390' name='page_390'></a>390</span> +have known in general society that he had any +weight of learning to bear. He seemed to be +merely a cultivated and agreeable man of the +world, interested in letters and politics, but disposed +rather to listen than to talk. He was +sometimes enigmatic and “not incapable of casting +a pearl of irony in the way of those who would +mistake it for pebbly fact.”<a name='FNanchor_0052' id='FNanchor_0052'></a><a href='#Footnote_0052' class='fnanchor'>[61]</a> A great capacity +for cynicism remained a capacity only, because +joined to a greater reverence for virtue. In a +large company he seldom put forth the fulness +of his powers; it was in familiar converse +with persons whose tastes resembled his own +that the extraordinary finesse and polish of his +mind revealed themselves. His critical taste was +not only delicate, but exacting; his judgments +leaned to the side of severity. No one applied +a more stringent moral standard to the conduct +of men in public affairs, whether to-day or in +past ages. He insisted upon this, in his inaugural +lecture at Cambridge, as the historian’s first duty. +“It is,” said he, “the office of historical science to +maintain morality as the sole impartial criterion +of men and things.” When he came to estimate +the value of literary work he seemed no less +hard to satisfy. His ideal, both as respected +thoroughness in substance and finish in form, +was impossibly high, and he noted every failure +to reach it. No one appreciated merit more +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_391' name='page_391'></a>391</span> +cordially. No one spoke with warmer admiration +of such distinguished historians and theologians +as the men whom I have just named. But the +precision of his thinking and the fastidiousness +of his taste gave more than a tinge of austerity +to his judgment. His opinions were peculiarly +instructive and illuminative to Englishmen, because +he was only half an Englishman in blood, +less than half an Englishman in his training and +mental habits. He was as much at home in Paris +or Berlin or Rome as he was in London, speaking +the four great languages with almost equal +facility, and knowing the men who in each of these +capitals were best worth knowing. He viewed +our insular literature and politics with the detachment +not only of a Roman Catholic among +Protestants, of a pupil of Döllinger and Roscher +among Oxford and Cambridge men, but also of +a citizen of the world, whose mastery of history +and philosophy had given him an unusually wide +outlook over mankind at large.</p> +<p>His interest in the great things, so far from +turning him away from the small things, seemed +to quicken his sense of their significance. It was +a noteworthy feature of his view of history that +he should have held that the explanation of most +of what has passed in the light is to be found in +what has passed in the dark. He was always +hunting for the key to secret chambers, preferring +to believe that the grand staircase is only for show, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_392' name='page_392'></a>392</span> +and meant to impose upon the multitude, while the +real action goes on in hidden passages behind. No +one knew so much of the gossip of the past; no +one was more intensely curious about the gossip +of the present, though in his hands it ceased +to be gossip and became unwritten history. One +was sometimes disposed to wonder whether he did +not think too much about the backstairs. But he +had seen a great deal of history in the making.</p> +<p>The passion for acquiring knowledge which +his German education had fostered ended by +becoming a snare to him, because it checked his +productive powers. Not that learning burdened +him, or clogged the soaring pinions of his mind. +He was master of all he knew. But acquisition +absorbed so much of his time that little was left +for literary composition. (Döllinger saw the +danger, for he observed that if Acton did not +write a great book before he reached the age +of forty, he would never do so.) It made him +think that he could not write on a subject till +he had read everything, or nearly everything, +that others had written about it. It developed +the habit of making extracts from the books he +read, a habit which took the form of accumulating +small slips of paper on which these +extracts were written in his exquisitely neat and +regular hand, the slips being arranged in cardboard +boxes according to their subjects. He +had hundreds of these boxes; and though much +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_393' name='page_393'></a>393</span> +of their contents must no doubt be valuable, the +time spent in distilling and bottling the essence +of the books whence they came, might have been +better spent in giving to the world the ideas +which they had helped to evoke in his own mind. +If one may take the quotations appended to +his inaugural lecture as a sample of those he +had collected, many of them were not exceptionally +valuable, and did little more than show +how the same idea, perhaps no recondite one, +might be expressed in different words by different +persons. When one read some article he had +written, garnished and even overloaded with +citations, one often felt that his own part was +better, both in substance and in form, than the +passages which he had culled from his predecessors. +It becomes daily more than ever true +that the secret of historical composition is to +know what to neglect, since in our time it has +become impossible to exhaust the literature of +most subjects, and, as respects the last two +centuries, to exhaust even the original authorities. +Yet how shall one know what to neglect without +at least a glance of inspection? Acton was unwilling +to neglect anything; and his ardour for completeness +drew him into a policy fit only for one +who could expect to live three lives of mortal men.</p> +<p>The love of knowledge grew upon him till +it became a passion of the intellect, a thirst like +the thirst for water in a parching desert. What +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_394' name='page_394'></a>394</span> +he sought to know was not facts only, but facts +in their relations to principles, facts so disposed +and fitly joined together as to become the causeway +over which the road to truth shall pass. +For this purpose events were in his view not +more important than the thoughts of men, because +discursive and creative thought was to him the +ruling factor in history. Hence books must be +known—books of philosophic creation, books of +philosophic reflection, no less than those which +record what has happened. The danger of this +conception is that everything men have said or +written, as well as everything they have done, +becomes a possibly significant fact; and thus the +search for truth becomes endless because the +materials are inexhaustible.</p> +<p>He expressed in striking words, prefixed to +a list of books suggested for a young man’s +perusal, his view of the aim of a course of +historical reading. It is “to give force and +fulness and clearness and sincerity and independence +and elevation and generosity and serenity +to his mind, that he may know the method and +law of the process by which error is conquered +and truth is won, discerning knowledge from +probability and prejudice from belief, that he +may learn to master what he rejects as fully as +what he adopts, that he may understand the +origin as well as the strength and vitality of +systems and the better motive of men who are +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_395' name='page_395'></a>395</span> +wrong ... and to steel him against the charm +of literary beauty and talent.”<a name='FNanchor_0053' id='FNanchor_0053'></a><a href='#Footnote_0053' class='fnanchor'>[62]</a></p> +<p>Neither his passion for facts nor his appreciation +of style and form made him decline to the +right hand or to the left from the true position +of a historian. He set little store upon what is +called literary excellence, and would often reply, +when questioned as to the merits of some book +bearing an eminent name, “You need not read +it: it adds nothing to what we knew.” He valued +facts only so far as they went to establish a principle +or explained the course of events. It was really +not so much in the range of his knowledge as in +the profundity and precision of his thought that +his greatness lay.</p> +<p>His somewhat overstrained conscientiousness, +coupled with the practically unattainable ideal of +finish and form which he set before himself, made +him less and less disposed to literary production. +No man of first-rate powers has in our time left +so little by which posterity may judge those +powers. In his early life, when for a time he +edited the <i>Home and Foreign Review</i>, and when +he was connected with the <i>Rambler</i> and the +<i>North British Review</i>, he wrote frequently; and +even between 1868 and 1890 he contributed +to the press some few historical essays and a +number of anonymous letters. But the aversion +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_396' name='page_396'></a>396</span> +to creative work seemed to grow on him. About +1890 he so far yielded to the urgency of a few +friends as to promise to reissue a number of his +essays in a volume, but, after rewriting and polishing +these essays during several years, he abandoned +the scheme altogether. In 1882 he had +already drawn out a plan for a comprehensive +history of Liberty. But this plan also he +dropped, because the more he read with a view +to undertaking it the more he wished to read, +and the vaster did the enterprise seem to loom up +before him. With him, as with many men who +cherish high literary ideals, the Better proved +to be the enemy of the Good.</p> +<p>Twenty years ago, late at night, in his library +at Cannes, he expounded to me his view of how +such a history of Liberty might be written, and +in what wise it might be made the central thread +of all history. He spoke for six or seven minutes +only; but he spoke like a man inspired, seeming +as if, from some mountain summit high in air, he +saw beneath him the far-winding path of human +progress from dim Cimmerian shores of prehistoric +shadow into the fuller yet broken and +fitful light of the modern time. The eloquence +was splendid, but greater than the eloquence was +the penetrating vision which discerned through +all events and in all ages the play of those moral +forces, now creating, now destroying, always +transmuting, which had moulded and remoulded +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_397' name='page_397'></a>397</span> +institutions, and had given to the human spirit +its ceaselessly-changing forms of energy. It was +as if the whole landscape of history had been +suddenly lit up by a burst of sunlight. I have +never heard from any other lips any discourse like +this, nor from his did I ever hear the like again.</p> +<p>His style suffered in his later days from +the abundance of the interspersed citations, and +from the overfulness and subtlety of the thought, +which occasionally led to obscurity. But when +he handled a topic in which learning was not +required, his style was clear, pointed and incisive, +sometimes epigrammatic. Several years ago he +wrote in a monthly magazine a short article upon +a biography of one of his contemporaries which +showed how admirable a master he was of polished +diction and penetrating analysis, and made one +wish that he had more frequently consented to +dash off light work in a quick unstudied way.</p> +<p>To the work of a University professor he came +too late to acquire the art of fluent and forcible +oral discourse, nor was the character of his mind, +with its striving after a flawless exactitude of +statement, altogether fitted for the function of +presenting broad summaries of facts to a youthful +audience. His predecessor in the Cambridge +chair of history, Sir John Seeley, with less knowledge, +less subtlety, and less originality, had in +larger measure the gift of oral exposition and +the power of putting points, whether by speech +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_398' name='page_398'></a>398</span> +or by writing, in a clear and telling way. No one, +indeed, since Macaulay has been a better point-putter +than Seeley was. But Acton’s lectures +(read from MS.) were models of lucid and stately +narrative informed by fulness of thought; and +they were so delivered as to express the feeling +which each event had evoked in his own mind. +That sternness of character which revealed itself +in his judgments of men and books never affected +his relations to his pupils. Precious as his time +was, he gave it generously, encouraging them +to come to him for help and counsel. They +were awed by the majesty of his learning. Said +one of them to me, “When Lord Acton answers +a question put to him, I feel as if I were looking +at a pyramid. I see the point of it clear +and sharp, but I see also the vast subjacent +mass of solid knowledge.” They perceived, +moreover, that to him History and Philosophy +were not two things but one, and perceived that +of History as well as of divine Philosophy it may +be said that she too is “charming, and musical as +is Apollo’s lute.” Thus the impression produced in +the University by the amplitude of Lord Acton’s +views, by the range of his learning, by the liberality +of his spirit and his unfailing devotion to +truth and to truth alone, was deep and fruitful.</p> +<p>When they wished that he had given to the world +more of his wisdom, his friends did not undervalue +a life which was in itself a rare and exquisite +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_399' name='page_399'></a>399</span> +product of favouring nature and unwearied diligence. +They only regretted that the influence of +his ideas, of his methods, and of his spirit, had +not been more widely diffused in an enduring +form. It was as when a plant unknown elsewhere +grows on some remote isle where ships seldom +touch. Few see the beauty of the flower, and +here death came before the seed could be gathered +to be scattered in receptive soil.</p> +<p>To most men Lord Acton seemed reserved as +well as remote, presenting a smooth and shining +surface beneath which it was hard to penetrate. +He avoided publicity and popularity with the +tranquil dignity of one for whom the world of +knowledge and speculation was more than sufficient. +But he was a loyal friend, affectionate to +his intimates, gracious in his manners, blameless +in all the relations of life. Comparatively few +of his countrymen knew his name, and those who +did thought of him chiefly as the confidant of Mr. +Gladstone, and as the most remarkable instance +of a sincere and steadfast Roman Catholic who +was a Liberal alike in politics and in theology. +But those who had been admitted to his friendship +recognised him as one of the finest intelligences +of his generation, an unsurpassed, +and indeed a scarcely rivalled, master of every +subject which he touched.</p> +<hr class='toprule' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_400' name='page_400'></a>400</span> +<a name='WILLIAM_EWART_GLADSTONE' id='WILLIAM_EWART_GLADSTONE'></a> +<h2>WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE</h2> +</div> +<p>Of no man who has lived in our times is it so +hard to speak in a concise and summary fashion +as of Mr. Gladstone. For fifty years he was so +closely associated with the public affairs of his +country that the record of his parliamentary life +is virtually an outline of English political history +during those years. His activity spread itself out +over many fields. He was the author of several +learned and thoughtful books, and of a multitude +of articles upon all sorts of subjects. He showed +himself as eagerly interested in matters of classical +scholarship and Christian doctrine and ecclesiastical +history as in questions of national finance +and foreign policy. No account of him could be +complete without reviewing his actions and +estimating the results of his work in all these +directions.</p> +<p>But the difficulty of describing and judging +him goes deeper. His was a singularly complex +nature, whose threads it was hard to unravel. +His individuality was extremely strong. All that +he said or did bore its impress. Yet it was an +individuality so far from being self-consistent +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_401' name='page_401'></a>401</span> +as sometimes to seem a bundle of opposite +qualities capriciously united in a single person. +He might with equal truth have been called, and +he was in fact called, a conservative and a revolutionary. +He was dangerously impulsive, and had +frequently to suffer for his impulsiveness; yet +he was also not merely prudent and cautious, +but so astute as to have been accused of craft +and dissimulation. So great was his respect +for tradition that he clung to views regarding +the authorship of the Homeric poems and +the date of the books of the Old Testament +which nearly all competent specialists +have now rejected. So bold was he in practical +matters that he carried through sweeping +changes in the British constitution, changed the +course of English policy in the nearer East, +overthrew an established church in one part of +the United Kingdom, and committed himself +in principle to the overthrow of two other +established churches in other parts. He came +near to being a Roman Catholic in his religious +opinions, yet was for the last twenty years +of his life the trusted leader of the English +Protestant Nonconformists and the Scottish +Presbyterians. No one who knew him intimately +doubted his conscientious sincerity and earnestness, +yet four-fifths of the English upper classes +were in his later years wont to regard him as a +self-interested schemer who would sacrifice his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_402' name='page_402'></a>402</span> +country to his ambition. Though he loved +general principles, and often soared out of the +sight of his audience when discussing them, he +generally ended by deciding upon points of detail +the question at issue. He was at different times +of his life the defender and the assailant of the +same institutions, yet scarcely seemed inconsistent +in doing opposite things, because his +methods and his arguments preserved the same +type and colour throughout. Those who had +at the beginning of his career discerned in him +the capacity for such diversities and contradictions +would probably have predicted that they +must wreck it by making his purposes fluctuating +and his course erratic. Such a prediction might +have proved true of any one with less firmness of +will and less intensity of temper. It was the +persistent heat and vehemence of his character, +the sustained passion which he threw into the +pursuit of the object on which he was for the +moment bent, that fused these dissimilar qualities +and made them appear to contribute to and +increase the total force which he exerted.</p> +<p>The circumstances of Mr. Gladstone’s political +career help to explain, or, at any rate, will furnish +occasion for the attempt to explain, this complexity +and variety of character. But before I +come to his manhood it is convenient to advert +to three conditions whose influence on him was +profound—the first his Scottish blood, the second +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_403' name='page_403'></a>403</span> +his Oxford education, the third his apprenticeship +to public life under Sir Robert Peel.</p> +<p>Theories of character based on race differences +are dangerous, because they are as hard to +test as they are easy to form. Still, we all +know that there are specific qualities and tendencies +usually found in the minds of men of +certain stocks, just as there are peculiarities in +their faces or in their speech. Mr. Gladstone +was born and brought up in Liverpool, and +always retained a touch of Lancashire accent. +But, as he was fond of saying, every drop of +blood in his veins was Scotch. His father’s +family belonged to the Scottish Lowlands, and +came from the neighbourhood of Biggar, in the +Upper Ward of Lanarkshire, where the ruined +walls of Gledstanes<a name='FNanchor_0054' id='FNanchor_0054'></a><a href='#Footnote_0054' class='fnanchor'>[63]</a>—“the kite’s rock”—may +still be seen. His mother was of Highland extraction, +by name Robertson, from Dingwall, in +Ross-shire. Thus he was not only a Scot, but a +Scot with a strong infusion of the Celtic element, +the element whence the Scotch derive most of +what distinguishes them from the northern English. +The Scot is more excitable, more easily +brought to a glow of passion, more apt to be +eagerly absorbed in one thing at a time. He +is also more fond of exerting his intellect on +abstractions. It is not merely that the taste for +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_404' name='page_404'></a>404</span> +metaphysical theology is commoner in Scotland +than in England, but that the Scotch have a +stronger relish for general principles. They +like to set out by ascertaining and defining such +principles, and then to pursue a series of logical +deductions from them. They are, therefore, +bolder reasoners than the English, less content +to remain in the region of concrete facts, more +prone to throw themselves into the construction +of a body of speculative doctrine. The +Englishman is apt to plume himself on being +right in spite of logic; the Scotchman likes +to think that it is through logic he has reached +his results, and that he can by logic defend +them. These are qualities which Mr. Gladstone +drew from his Scottish blood. He had a keen +enjoyment of the processes of dialectic. He +loved to get hold of an abstract principle and to +derive all sorts of conclusions from it. He was +wont to begin the discussion of a question by +laying down two or three sweeping propositions +covering the subject as a whole, and would then +proceed to draw from these others which he +could apply to the particular matter in hand. +His well-stored memory and boundless ingenuity +made the discovery of such general propositions +so easy a task that a method in itself agreeable +sometimes appeared to be carried to excess. He +frequently arrived at conclusions which the judgment +of the common-sense auditor did not +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_405' name='page_405'></a>405</span> +approve, because, although they seemed to have +been legitimately deduced from the general +principles just enunciated, they were somehow +at variance with the plain teaching of the facts. +At such moments one felt that the man who +was fascinating but perplexing Englishmen by +his subtlety was not himself an Englishman +in mental quality, but had the love for abstractions +and refinements and dialectical analysis +which characterises the Scotch intellect. He +had also a large measure of that warmth and +vehemence, called in the sixteenth century the +<i>perfervidum ingenium Scotorum</i>, which belong to +the Scottish temperament, and particularly to the +Celtic Scot. He kindled quickly, and when +kindled, he shot forth a strong and brilliant flame. +To any one with less power of self-control such +intensity of emotion as he frequently showed +would have been dangerous; nor did this excitability +fail, even with him, to prompt words +and acts which a cooler judgment would have +disapproved. But it gave that spontaneity which +was one of the charms of his nature; it produced +that impression of profound earnestness and of +resistless force which raised him out of the rank +of ordinary statesmen. The rush of emotion +swelling fast and full seemed to turn the whole +stream of intellectual effort into whatever channel +lay at the moment nearest.</p> +<p>With these Scottish qualities, Mr. Gladstone +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_406' name='page_406'></a>406</span> +was brought up at school and college (Eton and +Christ Church) among Englishmen, and received +at Oxford, then lately awakened from a long +torpor, a bias and tendency which never thereafter +ceased to affect him. The so-called +“Oxford Movement,” which afterwards obtained +the name of Tractarianism and carried Newman +and Manning, together with other less famous +leaders, on to Rome, had not yet, in 1831, when +Mr. Gladstone obtained his degree with double +first-class honours, taken visible shape, or +become, so to speak, conscious of its own purposes. +But its doctrinal views, its peculiar vein +of religious sentiment, its respect for antiquity +and tradition, its proneness to casuistry, its taste +for symbolism, were already in the air as influences +working on the more susceptible of the +younger minds. On Mr. Gladstone they told +with full force. He became, and never ceased +to be, not merely a High-churchman, but what +may be called an Anglo-Catholic, in his theology, +deferential not only to ecclesiastical tradition, +but to the living voice of the Visible Church, +revering the priesthood as the recipients (if +duly ordained) of a special grace and peculiar +powers, attaching great importance to the sacraments, +feeling himself nearer to the Church of +Rome, despite what he deemed her corruptions, +than to any of the non-Episcopal Protestant +churches. Henceforth his interests in life were +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_407' name='page_407'></a>407</span> +as much ecclesiastical as political. For a time +he desired to be ordained a clergyman. Had +this wish, abandoned in deference to his father’s +advice, been carried out, he must eventually have +become a leading figure in the Church of England +and have sensibly affected her recent history. +The later stages in his career drew him away +from the main current of political opinion within +that church. He who had been the strongest +advocate of the principle of the State establishment +of religion came to be the chief actor in +the disestablishment of the Protestant Episcopal +Church in Ireland, and a supporter of the policy +of disestablishment in Scotland and in Wales. +But the colour which these Oxford years gave +to his mind and thoughts was never effaced. +While they widened the range of his interests +and deepened his moral earnestness, they at the +same time confirmed his natural bent toward +over-subtle distinctions and fine-drawn reasonings, +and put him out of sympathy not only with the +attitude of the average Englishman, who is essentially +a Protestant—that is to say, averse to sacerdotalism, +and suspicious of any other religious +authority than that of the Bible and the individual +conscience—but also with two of the +strongest influences of our time, the influence +of the sciences of nature, and the influence of +historical criticism. Mr. Gladstone, though too +wise to rail at science, as many religious men +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_408' name='page_408'></a>408</span> +did till within the last few years, could never +quite reconcile himself either to the conclusions +of geology and zoology regarding the history of +the physical world and the creatures which inhabit +it, or to modern methods of critical inquiry +as applied to Scripture and to ancient literature +generally. The training which Oxford then +gave, stimulating as it was, and free from the +modern error of over-specialisation, was defective +in omitting the experimental sciences, and in +laying undue stress upon the study of language. +A proneness to dwell on verbal distinctions and +to trust overmuch to the analysis of terms as a +means of reaching the truth of things is noticeable +in many eminent Oxford writers of that and +the next succeeding generation—some of them, +like the illustrious F. D. Maurice, far removed +from Cardinal Newman and Mr. Gladstone in +theological opinion.</p> +<p>When, bringing with him a brilliant University +reputation, he entered the House of Commons at +the age of twenty-three, Sir Robert Peel was +leading the Tory party with an authority and +ability rarely surpassed in the annals of parliament. +Within two years the young man was +admitted into the short-lived Tory ministry of +1834, and soon proved himself a promising +lieutenant of the experienced chief. Peel was an +eminently wary man, alive to the necessity of +watching the signs of the times, of studying and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_409' name='page_409'></a>409</span> +interpreting the changeful phases of public +opinion. Yet he always kept his own counsel. +Even when he perceived that the policy he +had hitherto followed would need to be modified, +Peel continued to use guarded language and did +not publicly commit himself to change till it +was plain that the fitting moment had arrived. +He was, moreover, a master of detail, slow to +propound a plan until he had seen how its outlines +were to be filled up by appropriate devices +for carrying it out in practice. These qualities +and habits of the minister profoundly affected +his disciple. They became part of the texture of +Mr. Gladstone’s political character, and in his +case, as in that of Peel, they sometimes brought +censure upon him, as having locked up too long +within his breast views or purposes which he +thought it unwise to disclose till effect could be +forthwith given to them. Such reserve, such a +guarded attitude and tenderness for existing +institutions, may have been not altogether natural +to Mr. Gladstone’s mind, but due partly to the +influence of Peel, partly to the tendency to +hold by tradition and the established order +which reverence for Christian antiquity and faith +in the dogmatic teachings of the Church had +planted deep in his soul. The contrast between +Mr. Gladstone’s caution and respect for facts on +the one hand, and his reforming fervour on the +other, like the contrast which ultimately appeared +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_410' name='page_410'></a>410</span> +between his sacerdotal tendencies and his political +liberalism, contributed to make his character +perplexing and to expose his conduct to the +charge of inconsistency. Inconsistent, in the +proper sense of the word, he was not, much +less changeable. He was really, in his fundamental +convictions and the main habits of his +mind, one of the most tenacious and persistent +of men. But there were always at work in him +two tendencies. One was the speculative desire +to probe everything to the bottom, to try it +by the light of general principles and logic, and +when it failed to stand this test, to reject it. +The other was the sense of the complexity of +existing social and political arrangements, and of +the risk of disturbing any one part of them until +the time had arrived for resettling other parts +also. Every statesman feels both these sides to +every concrete question of reform. No one has +set them forth more cogently, and in particular +no one has more earnestly dwelt on the necessity +for the latter side, than the most profound +thinker among British statesmen, Edmund Burke. +When Mr. Gladstone stated either side with his +incomparable force, people forgot that there was +another side which would be no less vividly present +to him at some other moment. He was not only, +like all successful parliamentarians, necessarily +something of an opportunist, though perhaps less +so than his master, but was moved by emotion +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_411' name='page_411'></a>411</span> +more than most statesmen, and certainly more +than Peel. The relative strength with which +the need for drastic reform or the need for watchful +conservatism, as the case might be, presented +itself to his mind depended largely upon the +weight which his emotions cast into one or +other scale, and this emotional element made it +difficult to forecast his course. Thus his action +in public life was the result of influences differing +widely in their origin, influences, moreover, which +could be duly appreciated only by those who knew +him intimately.</p> +<p>Whoever has followed his political career has +been struck by the sharp divergence of the views +entertained by his fellow-countrymen about one +who had been for so long a period under their +observation. That he was possessed of boundless +energy and brilliant eloquence all agreed. +But agreement went no further. One section of +the nation accused him of sophistry, of unwisdom, +of a want of patriotism, of a lust for power. The +other section not only repelled these charges, +but admired in him a conscientiousness and a +moral enthusiasm such as no political leader had +shown for centuries. When the qualities of his +mind and the aptitudes for politics which he +showed have been briefly examined, it will be +fitting to return to these divergent views of his +character, and endeavour to discover which of +them contains the larger measure of truth. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_412' name='page_412'></a>412</span> +Meantime let it suffice to say that among the +reasons that led men to misjudge him, this union +in one person of opposite qualities was the chief. +He was rather two men than one. Passionate +and impulsive on the emotional side of his nature, +he was cautious and conservative on the intellectual. +Few understood the conjunction; still +fewer saw how much of what was perplexing in +his conduct it explained.</p> +<p>Mr. Gladstone sat for sixty-three years (1833-1895) +in Parliament, was for twenty-eight years +(1866-1894) the leader of his party, and was four +times Prime Minister. He began as a high +Tory, remained about fifteen years in that camp, +was then led by the split between Peel and the +Protectionists to take up an intermediate position, +and finally was forced to cast in his lot with the +Liberals, for in England, as in America, third +parties seldom endure. No parliamentary career +in English annals is comparable to his for its +length and variety; and of those who saw its +close in the House of Commons, there was only +one man, Mr. Villiers (who died in January 1898), +who could remember its beginning. Mr. Gladstone +had been opposed in 1833 to men who might +have been his grandfathers; he was opposed in +1894 to men who might have been his grandchildren. +It is no part of my design to describe +or comment on the events of such a life. All that +can be done here is to indicate the more salient +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_413' name='page_413'></a>413</span> +characteristics which a study of his career as a +statesman and a parliamentarian sets before us.</p> +<p>The most remarkable of these characteristics +was the openness, freshness, and eagerness of +mind which he preserved down to the end of +his life. Most men form few new opinions +after thirty-five, just as they form few new +intimacies. Intellectual curiosity may remain +even after fifty, but its range narrows as a man +abandons the hope of attaining any thorough +knowledge of subjects other than those which +make the main business of his life. It is impossible +to follow the progress of all the new ideas +that are set afloat in the world, impossible to +be always examining the foundations of one’s +political or religious beliefs. Repeated disappointments +and disillusionments make a man +expect less from changes the older he grows; +while indolence deters him from entering upon +new enterprises. None of these causes seemed +to affect Mr. Gladstone. He was as much +excited over a new book (such as Cardinal +Manning’s Life) at eighty-four as when at +fourteen he insisted on compelling little Arthur +Stanley (afterwards Dean of Westminster, and +then aged nine) forthwith to procure and study +Gray’s poems, which he had just perused himself. +His reading covered almost the whole field +of literature, except physical and mathematical +science. While frequently declaring that he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_414' name='page_414'></a>414</span> +must confine his political thinking and leadership +to a few subjects, he was so observant +of current events that the course of talk +brought up scarcely any topic in which he did +not seem to know what was the latest thing that +had been said or done. Neither the lassitude +nor the prejudices that usually accompany old age +prevented him from giving a fair consideration to +any new doctrines. But though his intellect was +restlessly at work, and though his curiosity disposed +him to relish novelties, except in theology, +that bottom rock in his mind of caution and reserve, +which has already been referred to, made +him refuse to part with old views even when he +was beginning to accept new ones. He allowed +both to “lie on the table” together, and while +declaring himself open to conviction, felt it +safer to speak and act on the old lines till the +process of conviction had been completed. It +took fourteen years, from 1846 to 1860, to carry +him from the Conservative into the Liberal camp. +It took five stormy years to bring him round to +Irish Home Rule, though his mind was constantly +occupied with the subject from 1880 to 1885, +and those who watched him closely saw that +the process had advanced a long way even in +1882. And as regards ecclesiastical establishments, +having written a book in 1838 as a warm +advocate of State churches, it was not till 1867 +that he adopted the policy of disestablishment +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_415' name='page_415'></a>415</span> +for Ireland, not till 1890 that he declared himself +ready to apply that policy in Wales and Scotland +also.</p> +<p>Both these qualities—his disposition to revise +his opinions in the light of new arguments and +changing conditions, and the silence he maintained +till the process of revision had been +completed—exposed him to misconstruction. +Commonplace men, unwont to give serious +scrutiny to their opinions, ascribed his changes +to self-interest, or at best regarded them as the +index of an unstable purpose. Dull men could +not understand why he should have forborne to +set forth all that was passing in his mind, and saw +little difference between reticence and dishonesty. +In so far as they shook public confidence, these +characteristics injured him in his statesman’s +work. Yet the loss was outweighed by the gain. +In a country where opinion is active and changeful, +where the economic conditions that legislation +has to deal with are in a state of perpetual flux, +where the balance of power between the upper, +the middle, and the poorer classes has been swiftly +altering during the last seventy years, no statesman +can continue to serve the public if he adheres +obstinately to the doctrines with which he started +in life. He must—unless, of course, he stands +aloof in permanent isolation—either subordinate +his own views to the general sentiment of his +party, and be driven to advocate courses he +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_416' name='page_416'></a>416</span> +secretly mislikes, or else, holding himself ready +to quit his party, if need be, must be willing +to learn from events, and to reconsider his +opinions in the light of emergent tendencies +and insistent facts. Mr. Gladstone’s pride as +well as his conscience forbade the former alternative; +it was fortunate that the tireless activity +of his intellect made the latter natural to him. +He was accustomed to say that the capital fault +of his earlier days had been his failure adequately +to recognise the worth and power of liberty, and +the tendency which things have to work out for +good when left to themselves. The application +of this principle gave room for many developments, +and many developments there were. He +may have shown less than was needed of that +prescience which is, after integrity and courage, +the highest gift of a statesman, but which can +seldom be expected from an English minister, +too engrossed to find time for the patient reflection +from which alone sound forecasts can +issue. But he had the next best quality, that +of remaining accessible to new ideas and learning +from the events which passed under his eyes.</p> +<p>With this openness and flexibility of mind +there went a not less remarkable ingenuity +and resourcefulness. Fertile in expedients, he +was still more fertile in reasonings by which +to recommend the expedients. The gift had +its dangers, for he was apt to be carried away +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_417' name='page_417'></a>417</span> +by the dexterity of his own dialectic, and to +think that a scheme must be sound in whose +support he could muster a formidable array +of arguments. He never seemed at a loss, in +public or in private, for a criticism, or for an +answer to the criticisms of others. If his power +of adapting his own mind to the minds of those +whom he had to convince had been equal to the +skill and swiftness with which he accumulated a +mass of matter persuasive to those who looked +at things in his own way, no one would have +exercised so complete a control over the political +opinion of his time. But his intellect +lacked this power of adaptation. It moved on +lines of its own, which were often misconceived, +even by those who sought to follow him loyally. +Thus, as already observed, he was blamed for +two opposite faults. Some, pointing to the fact +that he had frequently altered his views, denounced +him as a demagogue profuse of promises, +ready to propose whatever he thought +likely to catch the people’s ear. Others complained +that there was no knowing where to +have him; that he had an erratic mind, whose +currents ran underground and came to the +surface in unexpected places; that he did not +consult his party, but followed his own impulses; +that his guidance was unsafe because +his decisions were unpredictable. Much of +the suspicion with which he was regarded, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_418' name='page_418'></a>418</span> +especially after 1885, arose from this view of +his character.</p> +<p>It was an unfair view, yet nearer to the truth +than that which charged him with seeking to flatter +and follow the people. No great popular leader +had in him less of the demagogue. He saw, +of course, that a statesman cannot oppose the +general will beyond a certain point, and may +have to humour it in small things that he may +direct it in great ones. He was obliged, as +others have been, to take up and settle questions +he deemed unimportant because they were +troubling the body politic. Now and then, in +his later days, he so far yielded to his party +advisers as to express his approval of proposals +in which his own interest was slight. But he +was ever a leader, not a follower, and erred +rather in not keeping his finger closely and +constantly upon the pulse of public opinion. In +this point, at least, one may discover in him a +likeness to Disraeli. Slow as he was in maturing +his opinions, Mr. Gladstone was liable to forget +that the minds of his followers might not be +moving along with his own, and hence his +decisions sometimes took his party as well as +the nation by surprise. But he was too self-absorbed, +too eagerly interested in the ideas that +suited his own cast of thought, to be able to +watch and gauge the tendencies of the multitude. +The three most remarkable instances in which +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_419' name='page_419'></a>419</span> +his new departures startled the world were his +declarations against the Irish Church establishment +in 1867, against the Turks and the traditional +English policy of supporting them in 1876, +and in favour of Irish Home Rule in 1886, and +in none of these did any popular demand suggest +his pronouncement. It was the masses who took +their view from him, not he who took a mandate +from the masses. In each of these cases he may, +perhaps, be blamed for not having sooner perceived, +or at any rate for not having sooner announced, +the need for a change of policy. But it was very +characteristic of him not to give the full strength +of his mind to a question till he felt that it pressed +for a solution. Those who listened to his private +talk were scarcely more struck by the range of +his vision than by his unwillingness to commit +himself on matters whose decision he could +postpone. Reticence and caution were sometimes +carried too far, not merely because they +exposed him to misconstruction, but because +they withheld from his party the guidance it +needed. This was true in the three instances +just mentioned; and in the last of them it is +possible that earlier and fuller communications +might have averted the separation of some of +his former colleagues. Nor did he always +rightly divine the popular mind. His proposal +(in 1874) to extinguish the income-tax +fell completely flat, because the nation was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_420' name='page_420'></a>420</span> +becoming indifferent to that economy in public +expenditure which both parties had in the days +of Peel and Lord John Russell vied in demanding. +Cherishing his old financial ideals, Mr. Gladstone +had not marked the change. So he failed to +perceive how much the credit of his party was +suffering (after 1871) from the belief of large +sections of the people, that he was indifferent +to the interests of England outside England. +Perhaps, knowing the charge of indifference to +be groundless, he underrated the effect which the +iteration of it produced: perhaps his pride would +not let him stoop to dissipate it.</p> +<p>Though the power of reading the signs of +the times and swaying the mind of the nation +may be now more essential to an English +statesman than the skill which manages a legislature +or holds together a cabinet, that skill +counts for much, and must continue to do so +while the House of Commons remains the +governing authority of the country. A man +can hardly reach high place, and certainly cannot +retain high place, without possessing this +kind of art. Mr. Gladstone was at one time +thought to want it. In 1864, when Lord Palmerston’s +end was approaching, and Mr. Gladstone +had shown himself the strongest man among +the Liberal ministers in the House of Commons, +people speculated about the succession +to the headship of the party; and the wiseacres +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_421' name='page_421'></a>421</span> +of the day were never tired of repeating +that Mr. Gladstone could not possibly lead the +House of Commons. He wanted tact, they said, +he was too excitable, too impulsive, too much +absorbed in his own ideas, too unversed in the +arts by which individuals are conciliated. But +when, after twenty-five years of his unquestioned +reign, the time for his own departure drew nigh, +men asked how the Liberal party in the House +of Commons would ever hold together after it +had lost a leader of such consummate capacity. +The Whig critics of 1864 had grown so accustomed +to Palmerston’s way of handling the House +as to forget that a man might succeed by quite +different methods, and that defects, serious in +themselves, may be outweighed by transcendent +merits.</p> +<p>Mr. Gladstone had the defects ascribed to +him. His impulsiveness sometimes betrayed +him into declarations which a cooler reflection +would have dissuaded. The second reading +of the Irish Home Rule Bill of 1886 might +possibly have been carried had he not been +goaded by his opponents into words which +were construed as recalling or modifying the +concessions he had announced at a meeting +of the Liberal party held just before. More +than once precious time was wasted because antagonists, +knowing his excitable temper, brought +on discussions with the sole object of annoying +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_422' name='page_422'></a>422</span> +him and drawing from him some hasty deliverance. +Nor was he an adept, like Disraeli and Disraeli’s +famous Canadian imitator, Sir John A. +Macdonald, in the management of individuals. +His aversion for the meaner side of human +nature made him refuse to play upon it. Many +of the pursuits, and most of the pleasures, +which attract ordinary men had no interest for +him, so that much of the common ground on +which men meet was closed to him. He was, +moreover, too constantly engrossed by the subjects +he loved, and by enterprises which specially +appealed to him, to have leisure for the lighter +but often vitally important devices of political +strategy. I remember hearing, soon after 1870, +how Mr. Delane, then editor of the <i>Times</i>, had +been invited to meet the Prime Minister at a +moment when the support of that newspaper +would have been specially valuable to the Liberal +Government. Instead of using the opportunity +in the way that had been intended, Mr. Gladstone +dilated during the whole time of dinner upon +the approaching exhaustion of the English coal-beds, +to the surprise of the company and the unconcealed +annoyance of the powerful guest. It +was the subject then uppermost in his mind, and +he either forgot, or disdained, to conciliate Mr. +Delane. Good nature as well as good sense +made him avoid giving offence by personal reflections +in debate, and he usually suffered fools +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_423' name='page_423'></a>423</span> +if not, like St. Paul’s converts, gladly, yet +patiently.<a name='FNanchor_0055' id='FNanchor_0055'></a><a href='#Footnote_0055' class='fnanchor'>[64]</a> In the House of Commons he was +entirely free from airs, and, indeed, from any +assumption of superiority. The youngest member +might accost him in the lobby and be listened +to with perfect courtesy. But he had a bad +memory for faces, seldom addressed any one +outside the circle of his personal friends, and +more than once made enemies by omitting +to notice and show attention to recruits who, +having been eminent in their own towns, expected +to be made much of when they entered Parliament. +Having himself plenty of pride and comparatively +little vanity, he never realised the extent to which, +and the cheapness with which, men can be captured +and used through their vanity. Adherents were +sometimes turned into dangerous foes because +his preoccupation with graver matters dimmed his +sense of what may be done to win support by the +minor arts, such as an invitation to dinner or even a +seasonable compliment. And his mind, flexible as +it was in seizing new points of view and devising +expedients to meet new circumstances, did not +easily enter into the characters of other men. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_424' name='page_424'></a>424</span> +Ideas and causes interested him more than did +personal traits; his sympathy was keener and +stronger for the sufferings of nations or masses +of men than with the fortunes of an individual +man. With all his accessibility and kindliness, +he was at bottom chary of real friendship, +while the circle of his intimates became constantly +smaller with advancing years. So it befell that +though his popularity among the general body +of his adherents went on increasing, and the +admiration of his parliamentary followers remained +undiminished, he had in the House of Commons +few personal friends who linked him to the party +at large, and rendered to him those confidential +services which count for much in keeping all +sections in hearty accord and enabling the commander +to gauge the sentiment of his troops.</p> +<p>Of parliamentary strategy in that larger sense, +which covers familiarity with parliamentary forms +and usages, care and judgment in arranging the +business of the House, the power of seizing a +parliamentary situation and knowing how to +deal with it, the art of guiding a debate and +choosing the right moment for reserve and for +openness, for a dignified retreat, for a watchful +defence, for a sudden rattling charge upon the +enemy—of all this no one had a fuller mastery. +His recollection of precedents was unrivalled, for +it began in 1833 with the first reformed Parliament, +and it seemed as fresh for those remote +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_425' name='page_425'></a>425</span> +days as for last month. He enjoyed combat for +its own sake, not so much from inborn pugnacity, +for he was not disputatious in ordinary +conversation, as because it called out his fighting +force and stimulated his whole nature. “I am +never nervous in reply,” he once said, “though I +am sometimes nervous in opening a debate.” No +one could be more tactful or adroit when a crisis +arrived whose gravity he had foreseen. In the +summer of 1881 the House of Lords made some +amendments to the Irish Land Bill which were +deemed ruinous to the working of the measure, +and therewith to the prospects of the pacification +of Ireland. A conflict was expected which might +have strained the fabric of the constitution. The +excitement which quickly arose in Parliament +spread to the nation. Mr. Gladstone alone +remained calm and confident. He devised a +series of compromises, which he advocated in conciliatory +speeches. He so played his game that +by a few minor concessions he secured nearly all +the points he cared for, and, while sparing the +dignity of the Lords, steered his bill triumphantly +out of the breakers which had threatened to +engulf it. Very different was his ordinary demeanour +in debate when he was off his guard. +His face and gestures while he sat in the House +of Commons listening to an opponent would +express all the emotions that crossed his mind. +He would follow every sentence as a hawk follows +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_426' name='page_426'></a>426</span> +the movements of a small bird, would sometimes +contradict half aloud, sometimes turn to +his next neighbour to vent his displeasure at the +groundless allegations or fallacious arguments he +was listening to, till at last, like a hunting leopard +loosed from the leash, he would spring to his +feet and deliver a passionate reply. His warmth +would often be in excess of what the occasion +required, and quite disproportioned to the importance +of his antagonist. It was in fact the +unimportance of the occasion that made him thus +yield to his feeling. As soon as he saw that +bad weather was coming, and careful seamanship +wanted, his coolness returned, his language +became measured, while passion, though it might +increase the force of his oratory, never made him +deviate a hand’s breadth from the course he +had chosen. The Celtic heat subsided, and the +shrewd self-control of the Lowland Scot regained +command.</p> +<p>It was by oratory that Mr. Gladstone rose to +fame and power, as, indeed, by it most English +statesmen have risen, save those to whom wealth +and rank and family connections used to give a +sort of presumptive claim to high office, like the +Cavendishes and the Russells, the Bentincks and +the Cecils. And for many years, during which Mr. +Gladstone was suspected as a statesman because, +while he had ceased to be a Tory, he had not fully +become a Liberal, his eloquence was the main, one +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_427' name='page_427'></a>427</span> +might almost say the sole, source of his influence. +Oratory was a power in English politics even a +century and a half ago, as the career of the +elder Pitt shows. During the last seventy years, +years which have seen the power of rank and +family connections decline, it has, although +less cultivated as a fine art, continued to be +almost essential to the highest success, and it +still brings a man quickly to the front, though it +will not keep him there should he prove to want +the other branches of statesmanlike capacity.</p> +<p>The permanent reputation of an orator depends +upon two things, the witness of contemporaries +to the impression produced upon them, and the +written or printed record of his speeches. Few +are the famous speakers who would be famous +if they were tried by this latter test alone, and +Mr. Gladstone was not one of them. It is only +by a rare combination of gifts that one who +speaks with so much force and brilliance as +to charm his listeners is also able to deliver +thoughts so valuable in words so choice that +posterity will read them as literature. Some +of the ancient orators did this; but we seldom +know how far those of their speeches which +have been preserved are the speeches which +they actually delivered. Among moderns, a few +French preachers, Edmund Burke, Macaulay, and +Daniel Webster are perhaps the only speakers +whose discourses have passed into classics and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_428' name='page_428'></a>428</span> +find new generations of readers.<a name='FNanchor_0056' id='FNanchor_0056'></a><a href='#Footnote_0056' class='fnanchor'>[65]</a> Twenty years +hence Mr. Gladstone’s will not be read, except, of +course, by historians. Indeed, they ceased to be +read even in his lifetime. They are too long, +too diffuse, too minute in their handling of details, +too elaborately qualified in their enunciation of +general principles. They contain few epigrams +and few of those weighty thoughts put into telling +phrases which the Greeks called <span class='greek' title='gnômai'>γνῶμαι</span>. The +style, in short, is not sufficiently rich or polished +to give an enduring interest to matter whose +practical importance has vanished. The same +oblivion has overtaken all but a few of the +best speeches (or parts of speeches) of Grattan, +Sheridan, Pitt, Fox, Erskine, Canning, Plunket, +Brougham, Peel, Bright. It may, indeed, be +said—and the examples of Burke and Macaulay +show that this is no paradox—that the speakers +whom posterity most enjoys are rarely those who +most affected the audiences that listened to them.<a name='FNanchor_0057' id='FNanchor_0057'></a><a href='#Footnote_0057' class='fnanchor'>[66]</a></p> +<p>If, on the other hand, Mr. Gladstone be judged +by the impression he made on his own time, his +place will be high in the front rank. His speeches +were neither so concisely telling as Mr. Bright’s +nor so finished in diction; but no other man +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_429' name='page_429'></a>429</span> +among his contemporaries—neither Lord Derby +nor Mr. Lowe, nor Lord Beaconsfield nor Lord +Cairns, nor Bishop Wilberforce nor Bishop Magee—taken +all round, could be ranked beside him. +And he rose superior to Mr. Bright himself in +readiness, in variety of knowledge, in persuasive +ingenuity. Mr. Bright spoke seldom and required +time for preparation. Admirable in the breadth +and force with which he set forth his own position, +or denounced that of his adversaries, he was +not equally qualified for instructing nor equally +apt at persuading. Mr. Gladstone could both +instruct and persuade, could stimulate his friends +and demolish his opponents, and could do all +these things at an hour’s notice, so vast and well +ordered was the arsenal of his mind. Pitt was +superb in an expository or argumentative speech, +but his stately periods lacked variety. Fox, incomparable +in reply, was hesitating and confused +when he had to state his case in cold blood. +Mr. Gladstone showed as much fire in winding +up a debate as skill in opening it.</p> +<p>His oratory had, indeed, two faults. It wanted +concentration, and it wanted definition. There +were too many words, and the conclusion was +sometimes left vague because the arguments had +been too nicely balanced. I once heard Mr. +Cobden say: “I always listen to Mr. Gladstone +with pleasure and admiration, but I sometimes +have to ask myself, when he has sat down, ‘What +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_430' name='page_430'></a>430</span> +after all was it that he meant, and what practical +course does he recommend?’” These faults +were balanced by conspicuous merits. There +was a lively imagination, which enabled him +to relieve even dull matter by pleasing figures, +together with a large command of quotations +and illustrations. There were powers of sarcasm, +powers, however, which he rarely used, preferring +the summer lightning of banter to the +thunderbolts of invective. There was admirable +lucidity and accuracy in exposition. There was +art in the disposition and marshalling of his +arguments, and finally—a gift now almost lost +in England—there was a delightful variety and +grace of appropriate gesture. But above and +beyond everything else which enthralled the +listener, there stood out four qualities. Two of +them were merits of substance—inventiveness and +elevation; two were merits of delivery—force in +the manner, expressive modulation in the voice.</p> +<p>No one showed such swift resourcefulness in +debate. His readiness, not only at catching a +point, but at making the most of it on a moment’s +notice, was amazing. Some one would lean over +the back of the bench he sat on and show a +paper or whisper a sentence to him. Apprehending +the bearings at a glance, he would take +the bare fact and so shape and develop it, like +a potter moulding a bowl on the wheel out of +a lump of clay, that it grew into a cogent +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_431' name='page_431'></a>431</span> +argument or a happy illustration under the eye of +the audience, and seemed all the more telling +because it had not been originally a part of his +case. Even in the last three years of his parliamentary +life, when his sight had so failed that he +read nothing, printed or written, except what it +was absolutely necessary to read, and when his +deafness had so increased that he did not hear +half of what was said in debate, it was sufficient for +a colleague to say into the better ear a few +words explaining how the matter at issue stood, +and he would rise to his feet and extemporise +a long and ingenious argument, or retreat with +dexterous grace from a position which the course +of the discussion or the private warning of the +Whips had shown to be untenable. Never was +he seen at a loss either to meet a new point +raised by an adversary or to make the best of +an unexpected incident. Sometimes he would +amuse himself by drawing a cheer or a contradiction +from his opponents, and would then suddenly +turn round and use this hasty expression of their +opinion as the basis for a fresh argument of his +own. Loving conflict, he loved debate, and, +so far from being confused or worried by the +strain conflict put upon him, his physical health +was strengthened and his faculties were roused +to higher efficiency by having to prepare and +deliver a great speech. He had the rare faculty +of thinking ahead while he was speaking, and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_432' name='page_432'></a>432</span> +could, while pouring forth a stream of glittering +sentences, be at the same time (as one saw by +watching his eye) composing an argument to be +delivered five or ten minutes later. Once, at a +very critical moment, when he was defending a +great measure against the amendment—moved +by a nominal supporter of his own—which proved +fatal to it, a friend suddenly reminded him of +an incident in the career of the mover which might +be effectively used against him. When Mr. Gladstone +sat down after delivering an impassioned +speech, in the course of which he had several +times approached and then sheered off from the +incident, he turned round to the friend and said, +“I was thinking all the time I was speaking +whether I could properly use against —— what +you told me, but concluded, on the whole, that +it would be too hard on him.”</p> +<p>The weakness of his eloquence sprang from its +supersubtlety and superabundance. He was prone +to fine distinctions. He multiplied arguments when +it would have been better to rely upon two or +three of the strongest. And he was sometimes +so intent on refuting the particular adversaries +opposed to him, and persuading the particular +audience before him, that he forgot to address +his reasonings to the public beyond the House, +and make them equally applicable and equally +convincing to the readers of next morning.</p> +<p>As dignity is one of the rarest qualities in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_433' name='page_433'></a>433</span> +literature, so elevation is one of the rarest in +oratory. It is a quality easier to feel than to +analyse. One may call it a power of ennobling +ordinary things by showing their relation to great +things, by pouring high emotions round them, +by bringing the worthier motives of human +conduct to bear upon them, by touching them +with the light of poetry. Ambitious writers and +speakers strain after effects of this kind; but +they are effects which study and straining +cannot ensure. Vainly do most men flap their +wings in the effort to soar; if they succeed +in rising from the ground it is because some +unusually strong burst of feeling makes them +for the moment better than themselves. In +Mr. Gladstone the capacity for feeling was at +all times so strong, and the susceptibility of the +imagination so keen, that he soared without +effort. His vision seemed to take in the whole +landscape. The points actually in question +might be small, but the principles involved were +to him far-reaching. The contests of to-day +were ennobled by the effect they might have in +a still distant future. There are rhetoricians +skilful in playing by words and manner on every +chord of human nature, rhetoricians who move +you, and may even carry you away for the +moment, but whose sincerity is doubted, because +the sense of spontaneity is lacking. Mr. Gladstone +was not of these. He never seemed to be +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_434' name='page_434'></a>434</span> +forcing an effect or assuming a sentiment. To +listen to him was to feel convinced of his own +conviction and to be warmed by the warmth with +which he expressed it. Nor was this due to the +perfection of his rhetorical art. He really did +feel what he expressed. Sometimes, of course, +like all statesmen, he had to maintain a cause +whose weakness he perceived, as, for instance, +when it became necessary to defend the blunder +of a colleague, or a decision reached by some +Cabinet compromise which his own judgment +disapproved. But even in such cases he did +not simulate feeling, but reserved his earnestness +for those parts of the case on which it could be +honestly expended. As this was generally true +of the imaginative and emotional side of his eloquence, +so was it especially true of his unequalled +power of lifting a subject from the level on which +other speakers had treated it into the purer air +of permanent principle, perhaps even of moral +sublimity.</p> +<p>The dignity and spontaneity which marked the +substance of his speeches was no less conspicuous +in their delivery. Nothing could be more easy and +graceful than his manner on ordinary occasions, +nothing more grave and stately than it became +when he was making a ceremonial reference +to some public event or bestowing a meed of +praise on the departed. His expository discourses, +such as those with which he introduced +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_435' name='page_435'></a>435</span> +a complicated bill or unfolded a financial statement, +were models of their kind, not only for +lucidity, but for the pleasant smoothness, never +lapsing into monotony, with which the stream +of speech flowed from his lips. The task was +performed so well that people thought it an +easy task till they saw how inferior were the +performances of two subsequent chancellors of +the exchequer so able in their respective +ways as Sir Stafford Northcote and Mr. Lowe. +But when an occasion arrived which quickened +men’s pulses in the House of Commons, a place +where feeling rises as suddenly as do the waves +of a Highland loch when a squall comes rushing +down the glen, the vehemence of his feeling +found expression in the fire of his eye and the +resistless strength of his words. His utterance +did not grow swifter, nor did the key of his +voice rise, as passion raises and sharpens the +voice in most men. But the measured force with +which every sentence was launched, like a shell +hurtling through the air, the concentrated intensity +of his look, as he defied antagonists in +front and swept his glance over the ranks of his +supporters around and behind him, had a startling +and thrilling power which no other Englishman +could exert, and which no Englishman had +exerted since the days of Pitt and Fox. The +whole proud, bold, ardent nature of the man +seemed to flash out, and one almost forgot what +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_436' name='page_436'></a>436</span> +the lips said in admiration of the towering +personality.</p> +<p>People who read next day the report in the +newspapers of a speech delivered on such an +occasion could not comprehend the impression +it had made on the listeners. “What was there +in it so to stir you?” they asked. They had not +seen the glance and the gestures; they had not +heard the vibrating voice rise to an organ peal +of triumph or sink to a whisper of entreaty. Mr. +Gladstone’s voice was naturally rich and resonant. +It was a fine singing voice, and a pleasant voice +to listen to in conversation, not the less pleasant +for having a slight trace of Liverpool accent +clinging to it. But what struck one in listening +to his speeches was not so much the quality of +the vocal chords as the skill with which they were +managed. He had a gift of sympathetic expression, +of throwing his feeling into his voice, +and using its modulations to accompany and convey +every shade of meaning, like that which a +great composer exerts when he puts music to a +poem, or a great executant when he renders at +once the composer’s and the poet’s thought. And +just as accomplished singers or violinists enjoy +the practice of their art, so he rejoiced, perhaps +unconsciously, yet intensely, in putting forth this +faculty of expression; as appeared, indeed, from +the fact that whenever his voice failed him +(which sometimes befell in later years) his +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_437' name='page_437'></a>437</span> +words came less easily, and even the chariot of +his argument seemed to drive heavily. That +the voice should so seldom have failed was +wonderful. When he had passed his seventy-fifth +year, it became sensibly inferior in volume +and depth of tone. But its variety and delicacy +remained. In April 1886, he being then seventy-seven, +it held out during a speech of nearly +four hours in length. In February 1890 it +enabled him to deliver with extraordinary effect +an eminently solemn and pathetic appeal. In +March 1894 those who listened to it the last time +it was heard in Parliament—they were comparatively +few, for the secret of his impending +resignation had been well kept—recognised in it +all the old charm. The most striking instance I +recall of the power it could exert is to be found +in a speech made in 1883, during one of the +tiresome debates occasioned by the refusal of +the Opposition and of some timorous Liberals +to allow Mr. Bradlaugh to be sworn as a member +of the House of Commons. This speech produced +on those who heard it an impression +which its perusal to-day fails to explain. That +impression was chiefly due to the grave and +reverent tone in which he delivered some +sentences stating the view that it is not our +belief in the bare existence of a Deity, but the +realising of him as being a Providence ruling +the world, that has moral value and significance +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_438' name='page_438'></a>438</span> +for us. And it was due in particular to the solemn +dignity with which he declaimed six lines of +Lucretius, setting forth the Epicurean view that +the gods do not concern themselves with human +affairs. There were perhaps not twenty men +in the House of Commons who could follow the +sense of the lines so as to appreciate their bearing +on his argument. But these sonorous hexameters—hexameters +that seemed to have lived on +through nineteen centuries to find their application +from the lips of an orator to-day—the +sense of remoteness in the strange language and +the far-off heathen origin, the deep and moving +note in the speaker’s voice, thrilled the imagination +of the audience and held it spellbound, lifting +for a moment the whole subject of debate +into a region far above party conflicts. Spoken +by any one else, the passage culminating in +these Lucretian lines might have produced +little effect. It was the voice and manner, +above all the voice, with its marvellous modulations, +that made the speech majestic.</p> +<p>Yet one must not forget to add that with him, +as with some other famous statesmen, the impression +made by a speech was in a measure due +to the admiring curiosity and wonder which his +personality inspired. He was so much the most +interesting human being in the House of Commons +that, when he withdrew, many members +said that the place had lost half its attraction for +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_439' name='page_439'></a>439</span> +them, and that the chamber looked empty because +he was not in it. Plenty of able men remained. +But even the ablest seemed ordinary when compared +with the figure that had vanished, a figure +in whom were combined, as in no other man of +his time, an unrivalled experience, an extraordinary +activity and versatility of intellect, a fervid imagination, +and an indomitable will.</p> +<p>Though Mr. Gladstone’s oratory was a main +source of his power, both in Parliament and over +the people, the effort of detractors to represent +him as a mere rhetorician will seem absurd +to the historian who reviews his whole career. +The rhetorician adorns and popularises the ideas +which have originated with others; he advocates +policies which others have devised; he follows +and expresses the sentiments which already prevail +in his party. Mr. Gladstone was himself a +source of new ideas and new policies; he evoked +new sentiments or turned old sentiments into +new channels. Neither was he, as some alleged, +primarily a destroyer. His conservative instincts +were strong; he cherished ancient custom. +When it became necessary to clear away an +institution he sought to put something else in +its place. He was a constructive statesman not +less conspicuously than were Pitt, Canning, and +Peel. Whether he was a philosophic statesman, +basing his action on large views obtained by +thought and study, philosophic in the sense in +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_440' name='page_440'></a>440</span> +which we apply the epithet to Pericles, Machiavelli, +Turgot, Burke, Jefferson, Hamilton, Stein—if +one class can be made to include persons +otherwise so dissimilar—may perhaps be doubted. +There are few instances in history of men who +have been great thinkers and also great legislators +or administrators, because the two kinds of +capacity almost exclude one another. As experts +declare that a man who should try to operate on +the Stock Exchange in reliance upon a profound +knowledge of the inner springs of European +politics and the financial resources of the great +States, would ruin himself before his perfectly +correct calculations had time to come true, so a +practical statesman, though he cannot know too +much, or look too far ahead, must beware of trusting +his own forecasts, must remember that he +has to deal with the next few months or years, +and to persuade persons who cannot be expected +to share or even to understand his views of the +future. The habit of meditating on underlying +truths, the tendency to play the long game, are +almost certain to spoil a man for dealing effectively +with the present. He will not be a sufficiently +vigilant observer; he will be out of sympathy +with the notions of the average man; his arguments +will go over the head of his audience. +No English prime minister has looked at politics +with the eye of a philosopher. But Mr. Gladstone, +if hardly to be called a thinker, showed +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_441' name='page_441'></a>441</span> +higher constructive power than any one else +has done since Peel. Were the memory of his +oratorical triumphs to pass completely away, he +would deserve to be remembered in respect of +the mark he left upon the British statute-book and +of the changes he wrought both in the constitution +of his country and in her European policy.</p> +<p>Three groups of measures stand out as monuments +of his skill and energy. The first of these +three includes the financial reforms embodied in +a series of fourteen budgets between the years +1853 and 1882, the most famous of which were +the budgets of 1853 and 1860. In the former he +continued the work begun by Peel by reducing +and simplifying the customs duties. Deficiencies +in revenue were supplied by the enactment of +less oppressive imposts, and particularly by resettling +the income-tax, and by the introduction +of a succession duty on real estate. The preparation +and passing of this very technical and +intricate Succession Duty Act was a most +laborious enterprise, of which Mr. Gladstone +used to speak as the severest mental strain he +had ever undergone:</p> +<table summary=''><tr><td> +<p class='cg'><span class='greek' title='Kartistên dê tên ge machên phato dymenai andrôn'>καρτίστην δὴ τήν γε μάχην φάτο δύμεναι ἀνδρῶν.</span><a name='FNanchor_0058' id='FNanchor_0058'></a><a href='#Footnote_0058' class='fnanchor'>[67]</a></p> +</td></tr></table> +<p>The budget of 1860, among other changes, +abolished the paper duty, a boon to the press +which was resisted by the House of Lords. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_442' name='page_442'></a>442</span> +They threw out the measure, but in the following +year Mr. Gladstone forced them to submit. +His achievements in the field of finance equal, if +they do not surpass, those of Peel, and are not +tarnished, as in the case of Pitt, by the recollection +of a burden of debts incurred. To no +minister can be ascribed so large a share in +promoting the commercial and industrial prosperity +of modern England, and in the reduction +of her national debt to the figure at which it +stood when it began to rise again in 1900.</p> +<p>The second group includes the parliamentary +reform bills of 1866 and 1884 and the Redistribution +Bill of 1885. The first of these was defeated +in the House of Commons, but it led to the +passing next year, by Mr. Disraeli, of a more +sweeping measure. Taken together, these statutes +have turned Britain into a democratic country, +changing the character of her government almost +as profoundly as did the Reform Act of 1832.</p> +<p>The third group consists of a series of Irish +measures, beginning with the Church Disestablishment +Act of 1869, and including the Land +Act of 1870, the University Education Bill of +1873 (defeated in the House of Commons), the +Land Act of 1881, and the Home Rule bills of +1886 and 1893. All these were in a special +manner Mr. Gladstone’s handiwork, prepared as +well as brought in and advocated by him. All +were highly complicated, and of one, the Land +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_443' name='page_443'></a>443</span> +Act of 1881, which it took three months to carry +through the House of Commons, it was said +that so great was its intricacy that only three +men understood it—Mr. Gladstone himself, his +Attorney-General for Ireland, and Mr. T. M. +Healy. In preparing a bill no man could be +more painstaking. He settled and laid down the +principles himself; and when he came to work them +out with the draughtsman and the officials who had +special knowledge of the subject, he insisted on +knowing what their effect would be in every +particular. Indeed, he loved work for its own +sake, in this respect unlike Mr. Bright, who once +said to me with a smile, when asked as to his +methods of working, that he had never done any +work all his life. The value of this mastery of +details was seen when a bill came to be debated +in Committee. It was impossible to catch Mr. +Gladstone tripping on a point of fact, or unprepared +with a reply to the arguments of an +opponent. He seemed to revel in the toil of +mastering a tangle of technical details.</p> +<p>It is long since England, in this respect not +favoured by her parliamentary system, has produced +a great foreign minister, nor has that title +been claimed for Mr. Gladstone. But he showed +on several occasions both his independence of +tradition and his faith in broad principles as fit to +be applied in international relations; and his +action in that field, though felt only at intervals, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_444' name='page_444'></a>444</span> +has left abiding results in European history. In +1851, he being then still a Tory, his pamphlet +denouncing the cruelties of the Bourbon government +of Naples, and the sympathy he subsequently +avowed with the national movement in +Italy, gave that movement a new standing in +Europe by powerfully recommending it to English +opinion. In 1870 the prompt action of his ministry +in arranging a treaty for the neutrality of Belgium +on the outbreak of the war between France and +Germany, averted the risk that Belgium might +be drawn into the strife. In 1871, by concluding +the treaty of Washington, which provided for the +settlement by arbitration of the <i>Alabama</i> claims, +he not only set a precedent full of promise for +the future, but delivered England from what +would have been, in case of her being at war with +any European power, a danger fatal to her ocean +commerce. And, in 1876, his onslaught upon the +Turks, after the Bulgarian massacres, roused an +intense feeling in England, turning the current of +opinion so decisively that Disraeli’s ministry were +forced to leave the Sultan to his fate, and thus +became a cause of the ultimate deliverance of +Bulgaria, Eastern Rumelia, Bosnia, and Thessaly +from Mussulman tyranny. Few English statesmen +have equally earned the gratitude of the +oppressed.</p> +<p>Nothing lay nearer to his heart than the protection +of the Christians of the East. His sense +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_445' name='page_445'></a>445</span> +of personal duty to them was partly due to the +feeling that the Crimean War had prolonged the +rule of the Turk, and had thus imposed a special +responsibility on Britain, and on the members +of Lord Aberdeen’s cabinet which drifted into +that war. Twenty years after the agitation of +1876, and when he had finally retired from +Parliament and political life, the massacres perpetrated +by the Sultan on his Armenian subjects +brought him once more into the field, and +his last speech in public (delivered at Liverpool +in the autumn of 1896) was a powerful argument +in favour of British intervention to rescue the +Eastern Christians. In the following spring he +followed this up by a pamphlet on behalf of the +freedom of Crete. In neither of these two cases +did success crown his efforts, for the Government, +commanding a large majority in Parliament, +pursued the course upon which it had already +entered. Poignant regrets were expressed +that Mr. Gladstone was no longer able to take +effective action in the cause of humanity; yet +it was a consolation to be assured that age and +infirmity had not dulled his sympathies with +that cause.</p> +<p>That he was right in 1876-78 in the view he +took of the line of conduct England should adopt +towards the Turks has been now virtually +admitted even by his opponents. That he was +also right in 1896, when urging action to protect +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_446' name='page_446'></a>446</span> +the Eastern Christians, will probably be admitted +ten years hence, when the facts of the case and +the nature of the opportunity that existed for +taking prompt action without the risk of a +European war have become better known. In +both cases it was not merely religious sympathy, +but also a far-sighted view of policy that governed +his judgment. He held that the faults of Turkish +rule are incurable, and that the Powers of Western +and Central Europe ought to aim at protecting +the subject nationalities and by degrees extending +self-government to them, so that they may +grow into states, and in time be able to restore +prosperity to regions ruined by long misgovernment, +while constituting an effective barrier to +the advance of Russia. The jealousies of the +Powers throw obstacles in the way of this policy, +but it is a safe policy for England, and offers the +best hope for the peoples of the East.</p> +<p>The facts just noted prove that he possessed +and exerted a capacity for initiative in foreign as +well as in domestic affairs. In the Neapolitan case, +in the <i>Alabama</i> case, in the Bulgarian case, he +acted from his own convictions, with no previous +suggestion of encouragement from his party; and +in the last-mentioned instance he took a course +which did not at the moment promise any political +gain, and which seemed to the English political +world so novel and even startling that no ordinary +statesman would have ventured on it.</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_447' name='page_447'></a>447</span></div> +<p>His courage was indeed one of the most +striking parts of the man.<a name='FNanchor_0059' id='FNanchor_0059'></a><a href='#Footnote_0059' class='fnanchor'>[68]</a> It was not the rashness +of an impetuous nature, for, impetuous as +he was when stirred by some sudden excitement, +he showed an Ulyssean caution whenever he took a +deliberate survey of the conditions that surrounded +him. It was the proud self-confidence of a strong +character, which was willing to risk fame and +fortune in pursuing a course it had once resolved +upon; a character which had faith in its own +conclusions, and in the success of a cause consecrated +by principle; a character which obstacles +did not affright, but rather roused to a higher +combative energy. Few English statesmen have +done anything so bold as was Mr. Gladstone’s +declaration for Irish Home Rule in 1886. He +took not only his political power but the fame +and credit of his whole past life in his hand when +he set out on this new journey at seventy-seven +years of age; for it was quite possible that the +great bulk of his party might refuse to follow +him, and he be left exposed to derision as the +chief of an insignificant group. As it happened, +the bulk of the party did follow him, though +many of the most influential refused to do so. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_448' name='page_448'></a>448</span> +But neither he nor any one else could have foretold +this when his intentions were first announced.</p> +<p>We may now, before passing away from the +public side of Mr. Gladstone’s career, return +for a moment to the opposite views of his +character which were indicated some pages back. +He was accused of sophistry, of unwisdom, of +want of patriotism, of lust for power. Though it +is difficult to sift these charges without discussing +the conduct which gave rise to them, a task impossible +here, each of them must be briefly examined.</p> +<p>The first charge is the most plausible. His ingenuity +in discovering arguments and stating fine +verbal distinctions, his subtlety in discriminating +between views or courses apparently similar, were +excessive, and invited misconstruction. He had a +tendency to persuade himself, quite unconsciously, +that the course he desired to take was a course +which the public interest required. His acuteness +soon found reasons for that course; the warmth +of his emotions enforced the reasons. It was a +dangerous tendency, but it does not impeach his +honesty of purpose, for the influence which his +predilections unconsciously exerted upon his +judgment appeared also in his theological and +literary inquiries. I can recall no instance in +which he wilfully misstated a fact, or simulated a +feeling, or used an argument which he knew to be +unsound. He did not, as does the sophist, attempt +“to make the worse appear the better reason.”</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_449' name='page_449'></a>449</span></div> +<p>His wisdom will be differently judged by +those who condemn or approve the chief acts of +his policy. But it deserves to be noted that all +the legislation he passed, even the measures +which, like the Irish Church Disestablishment +Bill, exposed him to angry attacks at the time, +have now been approved by the all but unanimous +judgment of Englishmen.<a name='FNanchor_0060' id='FNanchor_0060'></a><a href='#Footnote_0060' class='fnanchor'>[69]</a> The same +may be said of two acts which brought much +invective upon him—his settlement of the +<i>Alabama</i> claims, one of the wisest strokes of +foreign policy ever accomplished by a British +minister, and his protest against a support of the +Turks in and after 1876. I pass by Irish Home +Rule, because the wisdom of the course he took +must be tested by results that are yet unborn, +as I pass by his Egyptian policy in 1882-85, +because it cannot be fairly judged till the facts +have been fully made public. He may be open +to blame for his participation in the Crimean War, +for his mistaken view of the American Civil War, +for his neglect of the Transvaal question when +he took office in 1880, and for his omission during +his earlier career to recognise the gravity of Irish +disaffection and to study its causes. I have heard +him lament that he had not twenty years earlier +given the same attention to that abiding source of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_450' name='page_450'></a>450</span> +the difficulties of England which he gave from 1866 +onwards. If in these instances he erred, it must be +remembered that he erred in company with nine-tenths +of British statesmen in both political parties.</p> +<p>Their admiration did not prevent his friends +from noting tendencies which sometimes led him +to miscalculate the forces he had to deal with. +Being, like the younger Pitt, extremely sanguine, +he was prone to underrate difficulties. Hopefulness +is a splendid quality. It is both the child +and the parent of faith. Without it neither Mr. +Pitt nor Mr. Gladstone could have done what they +did. But it disposes its possessor not sufficiently +to allow for the dulness or the prejudice of others. +So too the intensity of Mr. Gladstone’s own feeling +made him fail to realise how many of his fellow-countrymen +did not know of, or were not shocked +by, acts of cruelty and injustice which had roused +his indignation. If his hatred of ostentation +suffered him to perceive that a nation, however +well assured of the reality of its power +and influence in the world, may also desire that +this power and influence should be asserted and +proclaimed to other nations, he refused to humour +that desire. He had a contempt for what is +called “playing to the gallery,” with a deep sense +of the danger of stimulating the passions which +lead to aggression and war. To national honour, +as he conceived it, national righteousness was vital. +His spirit was that of Lowell’s lines—</p> +<div><span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_451' name='page_451'></a>451</span></div> +<table summary=''><tr><td> +<p class='cg'>I love my country so as only they<br /> +Who love a mother fit to die for may.<br /> +I love her old renown, her ancient fame:<br /> +What better proof than that I loathe her shame?</p> +</td></tr></table> +<p>It was this attitude that brought on him the +charge of wanting patriotism, a charge first, I think, +insinuated at the time of the <i>Alabama</i> arbitration, +renewed when in 1876 he was accused of befriending +Russia and neglecting “British interests,” and +sedulously repeated thereafter, although in those +two instances the result had proved him right. +There was this much to give a kind of colour to +the charge, that he had scrupulously, perhaps too +scrupulously, refrained from extolling the material +power of England, preferring to insist upon her +responsibilities; that he was known to regret the +constant increase of naval and military expenditure, +and that he had several times taken a course +which honour and prudence seemed to him to +recommend, but which had offended the patriots +of the music-halls. But it was an unjust charge, +for no man had a warmer pride in England, a +higher sense of her greatness and her mission.</p> +<p>Was he too fond of power? Like other +strong men, he enjoyed it.<a name='FNanchor_0061' id='FNanchor_0061'></a><a href='#Footnote_0061' class='fnanchor'>[70]</a> That to secure it +he ever either adopted or renounced an opinion, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_452' name='page_452'></a>452</span> +those who understood and watched the workings +of his mind could not believe. He was not only +too conscientious, but too proud to forego any of +his convictions, and there were not a few occasions +when he took a course which considerations of +personal interest would have forbidden. He did +not love office, feeling himself happier without its +cares, and when he accepted it did so, I think, in +the belief that there was work to be done which +it was laid upon him individually to do. His +changes sprang naturally from the development of +his own ideas or (as in the case of his Irish policy) +from the teaching of facts. He sometimes so far +yielded to his colleagues as to sanction steps which +he thought not the best, and may in this have +sometimes erred; yet compromises are unavoidable, +for no Cabinet could be kept together if its +members did not now and then, in matters not +essential, yield to one another. When all the facts +of his life come to be known, instances may be disclosed +in which he was the victim of his own casuistry +or of his deference to Peel’s maxim that a +minister should not avow a change of view until +the time has come to give effect to it. But it will +also be made clear that he strove to obey his conscience, +that he acted with an ever-present sense +of his responsibility to the Almighty, and that he +was animated by an unselfish enthusiasm for +humanity, enlightenment, and freedom.</p> +<p>Whether he was a good judge of men was +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_453' name='page_453'></a>453</span> +a question much discussed among his friends. +With all his astuteness, he was in some ways +curiously simple; with all his caution, he was by +nature unsuspicious, disposed to treat all men as +honest till they gave him strong reasons for thinking +otherwise. Those who professed sympathy +with his views and aims sometimes succeeded in +inspiring more confidence than they deserved. +But where this perturbing influence was absent +he showed plenty of insight, and would pass +shrewd judgments on the politicians around him, +permitting neither their behaviour towards himself +nor his opinion of their moral character to +affect his estimate of their talents. In making +appointments in the Civil Service, or in the +Established Church, he rose to a far higher +standard of public duty than Palmerston or +Disraeli had reached or cared to reach, taking +great pains to find the fittest men, and giving +little weight to political considerations.<a name='FNanchor_0062' id='FNanchor_0062'></a><a href='#Footnote_0062' class='fnanchor'>[71]</a></p> +<p>His public demeanour, and especially his +excitability and vehemence of speech, made +people attribute to him an overbearing disposition +and an irritable temper. In private one did +not find these faults. Masterful he certainly +was, both in speech and in action. His ardent +manner, the intensity of his look, the dialectical +vigour with which he pressed an argument, were +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_454' name='page_454'></a>454</span> +apt to awe people who knew him but slightly, +and make them abandon resistance. A gifted +though somewhat erratic politician of long bygone +days told me how he once fared when he had risen +in the House of Commons to censure some act of +his leader. “I had not gone on three minutes +when Gladstone turned round and gazed at me +so that I had to sit down in the middle of a +sentence. I could not help it. There was no +standing his eye.” But he neither meant nor +wished to beat down his opponents by mere +authority. One who knew him as few people +did observed to me, “When you are arguing +with Mr. Gladstone, you must never let him +think he has convinced you unless you are really +convinced. Persist in repeating your view, and +if you are unable to cope with him in skill of +fence, say bluntly that for all his ingenuity and +authority you think he is wrong, and you retain +your own opinion. If he respects you as a man +who knows something of the subject, he will be +impressed by your opinion, and it will afterwards +have due weight with him.” In his own Cabinet +he was willing to listen patiently to everybody’s +views, and, indeed, in the judgment of some of +his colleagues, was not, at least in his later +years, sufficiently strenuous in asserting and +holding to his own. It is no secret that some +of the most important decisions of the ministry +of 1880-85 were taken against his judgment, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_455' name='page_455'></a>455</span> +though, when they had been adopted, he was, of +course, bound to defend them in Parliament as if +they had received his individual approval. Nor, +though tenacious, did he bear malice against those +who had baffled him. He would exert his full +force to get his own way, but if he could not +get it, accepted the position with good temper.<a name='FNanchor_0063' id='FNanchor_0063'></a><a href='#Footnote_0063' class='fnanchor'>[72]</a> +He was too proud to be vindictive, too completely +master of himself to be betrayed into +angry words. Impatient he might sometimes +be under a nervous strain, but never rude or +rough. It was less easy to determine whether +he was overmindful of injuries, but those who +had watched him most closely held that mere +opposition or even insult did not leave a permanent +sting, and that the only thing he could +not forget or forgive was faithlessness. Himself +a model of loyalty to his colleagues, he followed +his favourite poet in consigning the <i>traditori</i> +to the lowest pit, although, like all statesmen, +he often found himself obliged to work with +those whom he distrusted.</p> +<p>He was less sensitive than Peel, as appeared +from his attitude toward his two chief opponents. +Disraeli’s attacks did not seem to gall him, +perhaps because, although he recognised the +ability and admired the courage of his adversary, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_456' name='page_456'></a>456</span> +he did not respect Disraeli’s character, remembering +his behaviour to Peel, and thinking him +habitually untruthful. Yet he never attacked +Disraeli personally. There was another of his +opponents of whom he entertained a specially +unfavourable opinion, but no one could have +told from his speeches what that opinion was. +Against Lord Salisbury, his chief antagonist +from 1881 onwards, he showed no resentment, +though Lord Salisbury had more than once +spoken discourteously of him. In 1890 he remarked +to me <i>apropos</i> of some attack, “I have +never felt angry at what Salisbury has said about +me. His mother was very kind to me when I +was quite a young man, and I remember Salisbury +as a little fellow in a red frock rolling about +on the ottoman.”</p> +<p>That his temper was naturally hot, no one +who looked at him could doubt. But he had it +in such tight control, and it was so free from +anything acrid or malignant, that it had become +a good temper, worthy of a fine nature. However +vehement his expressions, they did not wound +or humiliate, and those younger men who had to +deal with him were not afraid of a sharp answer or +an impatient repulse. He was cast in too large +a mould to have the pettiness of ruffled vanity +or to abuse his predominance by treating any +one as an inferior. His manners were the +manners of the old time, easy but stately. Like +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_457' name='page_457'></a>457</span> +his oratory, they were in what Matthew Arnold +used to call the grand style; and the contrast in +this respect between him and some of those +who crossed swords with him in literary or +theological controversy was apparent. His intellectual +generosity was a part of the same +largeness of nature. He cordially acknowledged +his indebtedness to those who helped him in +any piece of work, received their suggestions +candidly, even when opposed to his own preconceived +notions, did not hesitate to confess a +mistake. Those who know the abundance of +their resources, and have conquered fame, can +doubtless afford to be generous. Julius Cæsar +was, and George Washington, and so, in a +different sphere, were Isaac Newton and Charles +Darwin. But the instances to the contrary are +so numerous that one may say of magnanimity +that it is among the rarest as well as the finest +ornaments of character.</p> +<p>The essential dignity of Mr. Gladstone’s nature +was never better seen than during the last few +years of his life, after he had finally retired +(in 1894) from public life. He indulged in no +vain regrets, nor was there any foundation for +the rumours, so often circulated, that he thought +of re-entering the arena of strife. He spoke +with no bitterness of those who had opposed, +and sometimes foiled, him in the past. He +gave vent to no criticisms of those who from +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_458' name='page_458'></a>458</span> +time to time filled the place that had been +his in the government of the country or the +leadership of his party. Although his opinion +on current questions was frequently solicited, he +scarcely ever allowed it to be known, lest it +should embarrass his successors in the leadership +of the party, and never himself addressed the +nation, except (as already mentioned) on behalf +of what he deemed a sacred cause, altogether +above party—the discharge by Britain of her +duty to the victims of the Turk. As soon as an +operation for cataract had enabled him to resume +his habit of working for seven hours a day, he +devoted himself with his old ardour to the preparation +of an edition of Bishop Butler’s works, +resumed his multifarious reading, planned (as he +told me in 1896) a treatise on the Olympian religion, +and filled up the interstices of his working-time +with studies on Homer which he had been +previously unable to complete. No trace of the +moroseness of old age appeared in his manners or +his conversation, nor did he, though profoundly +grieved at some of the events which he witnessed, +and owning himself disappointed at the slow advance +made by a cause dear to him, appear less +hopeful than in earlier days of the general progress +of the world, or less confident in the beneficent +power of freedom to promote the happiness +of his country. The stately simplicity which had +always charmed those who saw him in private, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_459' name='page_459'></a>459</span> +seemed more beautiful than ever in this quiet +evening of a long and sultry day. His intellectual +powers were unimpaired, his thirst for knowledge +undiminished. But a placid stillness had +fallen upon him and his household; and in seeing +the tide of his life begin slowly to ebb, one +thought of the lines of his illustrious contemporary +and friend:—</p> +<table summary=''><tr><td> +<p class='cg'><span class='indent6'> </span>Such a tide as moving seems asleep,<br /> +<span class='indent10'> </span>Too full for sound and foam,<br /> +When that which drew from out the boundless deep<br /> +<span class='indent10'> </span>Turns again home.</p> +</td></tr></table> +<p>Adding to his grace of manner a memory +of extraordinary strength and quickness and an +amazing vivacity and variety of mental force, any +one can understand how fascinating Mr. Gladstone +was in society. He enjoyed it to the last, +talking as earnestly and joyously at eighty-seven as +he had done at twenty on every topic that came +up, and exerting himself with equal zest whether +his interlocutor was an archbishop or a youthful +curate. Though his party used to think that he +overvalued the political influence of the great +families, allotting them rather more than their share +of honours and appointments, no one was personally +more free from that taint of snobbishness +which is frequently charged upon Englishmen. +He gave the best he had to everybody alike, +paying to men of learning and letters a respect +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_460' name='page_460'></a>460</span> +which in England they seldom receive from the +magnates who lead society. And although he +was scrupulously observant of the rules of precedence +and conventions of social life, it was +easy to see that neither rank nor wealth had +that importance in his eyes which the latter +nowadays commands. Dispensing titles and +decorations with a liberal hand, his pride always +refused such so-called honours for himself.</p> +<p>It was often said of him that he lacked +humour; but this was only so far true that he +was apt to throw into small matters more force +and moral earnestness than were needed, and to +honour with a refutation opponents whom a +little light sarcasm would have better reduced +to their insignificance.<a name='FNanchor_0064' id='FNanchor_0064'></a><a href='#Footnote_0064' class='fnanchor'>[73]</a> In private he was wont +both to tell and to enjoy good stories; while +in Parliament, though his tone was generally +earnest, he could display such effective powers +of banter and ridicule as to make people +wonder why they were so rarely put forth. +Much of what passes in London for humour +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_461' name='page_461'></a>461</span> +is mere cynicism, and he hated cynicism so +heartily as to dislike even humour when it +had a cynical flavour. Wit he enjoyed, but +did not produce. The turn of his mind was +not to brevity, point, and condensation. He +sometimes struck off a telling phrase, but seldom +polished an epigram. His conversation was +luminous rather than sparkling; you were +interested and instructed while you listened, +but it was not so much the phrases as the +general effect that dwelt in your memory. +An acute observer once said to me that Mr. +Gladstone showed in argument a knack of hitting +the nail not quite on the head. The criticism +was so far just that he was less certain to go +straight to the vital issue in a controversy than +one expected from his force and keenness.</p> +<p>After the death of Thomas Carlyle he was +probably the best talker in London, and a talker +in one respect more agreeable than either Carlyle +or Macaulay, inasmuch as he was no less ready +to listen than to speak, and never wearied the +dinner-table by a monologue. His simplicity, +his spontaneity, his geniality and courtesy, as well +as the fund of knowledge and of personal recollections +at his command, made him so popular +in society that his opponents used to say it was +dangerous to meet him, because one might be +forced to leave off hating him. He was, perhaps, +too prone to go on talking upon the +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_462' name='page_462'></a>462</span> +subject which filled his mind at the moment; +nor was it easy to divert his attention to something +else which others might deem more important.<a name='FNanchor_0065' id='FNanchor_0065'></a><a href='#Footnote_0065' class='fnanchor'>[74]</a> +Those who stayed with him in the +same country house sometimes complained that +the perpetual display of force and eagerness +tired them, as one tires of watching the rush +of Niagara. His guests, however, did not feel +this, for his own home life was quiet and smooth. +He read and wrote a good many hours daily, but +never sat up late, almost always slept soundly, +never seemed oppressed or driven to strain +his strength. With all his impetuosity, he +was regular, systematic, and deliberate in his +habits and ways of doing business. A swift +reader and a surprisingly swift writer, he was +always occupied, and was skilful in using even +the scraps and fragments of his time. No pressure +of work made him fussy, nor could any one +remember to have seen him in a hurry.</p> +<p>The best proof of his swiftness, industry, and +skill in economising time is supplied by the +quantity of his literary work, which, considering +the abstruse nature of the subjects to which +much of it is related, would have been creditable +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_463' name='page_463'></a>463</span> +to the diligence of a German professor +sitting alone in his study. The merits of the +work have been disputed. Mankind are slow to +credit the same person with eminence in various +fields. When they read the prose of a great +poet, they try it by severer tests than would be +applied to other writers. When a painter has +won credit by his landscapes or his cattle pieces, +he is seldom encouraged to venture into other +lines. So Mr. Gladstone’s reputation as an +orator stood in his own light when he appeared +as an author. He was read by thousands +who would not have looked at the article +or book had it borne some other name; but he +was judged by the standard, not of his finest +printed speeches, for his speeches were seldom +models of composition, but rather by the impression +which his finest speeches made on those +who heard them. Since his warmest admirers +could not claim for him as a writer of prose any +such pre-eminence as belonged to him as a +speaker, it followed that his written work was +not duly appreciated. Had he been a writer and +nothing else, he would have been eminent and +powerful by his pen.</p> +<p>He might, however, have failed to secure a place +in the front rank. His style was forcible, copious, +rich with various knowledge, warm with the +ardour of his temperament. But it suffered from +an inborn tendency to exuberance which the long +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_464' name='page_464'></a>464</span> +practice of oratory had confirmed. It was diffuse, +apt to pursue a topic into details, when these might +have been left to the reader’s own reflection. It +was redundant, employing more words than were +needed to convey the substance. It was unchastened, +indulging too freely in tropes and +metaphors, in quotations and adapted phrases +even when the quotation added nothing to the +sense, but was suggested merely by some association +in his own mind. Thus it seldom reached +a high level of purity and grace, and though one +might excuse the faults as natural to the work +of a swift and busy man, they were sufficient +to reduce the pleasure to be derived from the +form and dress of his thoughts. Nevertheless +there are not a few passages of rare merit, +both in the books and in the articles, among +which may be cited (not as exceptionally good, +but as typical of his strong points) the striking +picture of his own youthful feeling toward +the Church of England contained in the <i>Chapter +of Autobiography</i>, and the refined criticism of +<i>Robert Elsmere</i>, published in 1888. Almost +the last thing he wrote, a pamphlet on the +Greek and Cretan question, published in the +spring of 1897, has the force and cogency of his +best days. Two things were never wanting to +him: vigour of expression and an admirable +command of appropriate words.</p> +<p>His writings fall into three classes: political, +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_465' name='page_465'></a>465</span> +theological, and literary—the last chiefly consisting +of his books and articles upon Homer +and the Homeric question. All the political +writings, except the books on <i>The State in its +Relations to the Church</i> and <i>Church Principles +considered in their Results</i>, belong to the class +of occasional literature, being pamphlets or +articles produced with a view to some current +crisis or controversy. They are valuable +chiefly as proceeding from one who bore a +leading part in the affairs they relate to, and +as embodying vividly the opinions and aspirations +of the moment, less frequently in respect +of permanent lessons of political wisdom, such +as one finds in Machiavelli or Tocqueville or +Edmund Burke. Like Pitt and Peel, Mr. Gladstone +had a mind which, whatever its original +tendencies, had come to be rather practical than +meditative. He was fond of generalisations and +principles, but they were always directly related +to the questions that came before him in actual +politics; and the number of weighty maxims or +illuminative suggestions to be found in his writings +and speeches is small in proportion to the +sustained vigour they display. Even Disraeli, +though his views were often fanciful and his +epigrams often forced, gives us more frequently +a brilliant (if only half true) historical <i>aperçu</i>, or +throws a flash of light into some corner of human +character. Of the theological essays, which are +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_466' name='page_466'></a>466</span> +mainly apologetic and concerned with the authenticity +and authority of Scripture, it is enough to +say that they were the work of an accomplished +amateur, who had been too busy to follow the progress +of critical inquiry. His Homeric treatises, +the most elaborate piece of work that proceeded +from Mr. Gladstone’s pen, are in one sense worthless, +in another sense admirable. Those parts of +them which deal with early Greek mythology, +genealogy, and religion, and, in a less degree, the +theories about Homeric geography and the use +of Homeric epithets, have been condemned by +the unanimous voice of scholars as fantastic. +The premises are assumed without sufficient investigation, +while the reasonings are fine-drawn +and flimsy. Extraordinary ingenuity is shown +in piling up a lofty fabric, but the foundation is +of sand, and the edifice has hardly a solid wall +or beam in it. A conjecture is treated as a fact; +then an inference, possible but not certain, is +drawn from this conjecture; a second possible +inference is based upon the first; and we are +made to forget that the probability of this second +is at most only half the probability of the first. +So the process goes on; and when the superstructure +is complete, the reader is provoked +to perceive how much dialectical skill has been +wasted upon a series of hypotheses which a breath +of common-sense criticism dissipates. If one is +asked to explain the weakness in this particular +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_467' name='page_467'></a>467</span> +department of a mind otherwise so strong, the +answer would seem to be that the element of +fancifulness in Mr. Gladstone’s intellect, and his +tendency to mistake mere argumentation for +verification, were checked in practical politics by +constant intercourse with friends and colleagues +as well as by the need of convincing visible +audiences, while in theological or historical inquiries +his ingenuity roamed with fatal freedom +over wide plains where no obstacles checked +its course. Something may also be due to the +fact that his philosophical and historical education +was received at a time when the modern +critical spirit and the canons it recognises had +scarcely begun to assert themselves at Oxford. +Similar defects may be discerned in other eminent +writers of his own and the preceding generation +of Oxford men, defects from which persons of +inferior power in later days might be free. In +some of these writers, and particularly in Cardinal +Newman, the contrast between dialectical acumen, +coupled with surpassing rhetorical skill, and the +vitiation of the argument by a want of the critical +faculty, is scarcely less striking; and the example +of that illustrious man suggests that the dominance +of the theological view of literary and +historical problems, a dominance evident in Mr. +Gladstone, counts for something in producing the +phenomenon.</p> +<p>With these defects, Mr. Gladstone’s Homeric +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_468' name='page_468'></a>468</span> +work had the merit of being based on a full +and thorough knowledge of the Homeric text. +He had seen, at a time when few people in +England had seen it, that the Homeric poems +are an historical source of the highest value, a +treasure-house of data for the study of early +Greek life and thought, an authority all the more +trustworthy because an unconscious authority, +addressing not posterity but contemporaries. +This mastery of the matter contained in the +poems enabled him to present valuable pictures +of the political and social life of Homeric Greece, +while the interspersed literary criticisms are often +subtle and suggestive, erring, when they do err, +chiefly through the over-earnestness of his mind. +He often takes the poet too seriously; reading +an ethical purpose into descriptive or dramatic +touches which are merely descriptive or dramatic. +Passages whose moral tendency offends him are +reprobated as later insertions with a naïveté which +forgets the character of a primitive age. But he +has for his author not only that sympathy which is +the best basis for criticism, but a justness of poetic +taste which the learned and painstaking German +commentator frequently wants. That Mr. Gladstone +was a sound scholar in that narrower sense of +the word which denotes a grammatical and literary +command of Greek and Latin, goes without saying. +Men of his generation kept a closer hold +upon the ancient classics than we do to-day; and +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_469' name='page_469'></a>469</span> +his habit of reading Greek for the sake of his +Homeric studies, and Latin for the sake of his +theological, made this familiarity more than +usually thorough. Like most Etonians, he loved +and knew the poets by preference. Dante was +his favourite poet, perhaps because Dante is the +most theological and ethical of the great poets, +and because the tongue and the memories of Italy +had a peculiar attraction for him. He used to say +that he found Dante’s thought incomparably inspiring, +but hard to follow, it was so high and so +abstract. Theology claimed a place beside poetry; +history came next, though he did not study it +systematically. It seemed odd that he was sometimes +at fault in the constitutional antiquities of +England; but this subject was, until the day of +Dr. Stubbs, pre-eminently a Whig subject, and +Mr. Gladstone never was a Whig, never learned +to think upon the lines of the great Whigs of +former days. His historical knowledge was not +exceptionally wide, but it was generally accurate +in matters of fact, however fanciful he might be +in reasoning from the facts, however wild his +conjectures in the prehistoric region. In metaphysics +strictly so called his reading did not go +far beyond those companions of his youth, Aristotle +and Bishop Butler; and philosophical speculation +interested him only so far as it bore on +Christian doctrine. Keen as was his interest +in theology and in history, it is not certain that +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_470' name='page_470'></a>470</span> +he would have produced work of permanent +value in either sphere even had his life been +wholly devoted to study. His mind seemed to +need to be steadied, his ingenuity restrained, +by having to deal with concrete matter for a +practical end. Neither, in spite of his eminence +as a financier and an advocate of free +trade, did he show much taste for economic +studies. On practical topics, such as the working +of protective tariffs, the abuse of charitable +endowments, the development of fruit-culture in +England, the duty of liberal giving by the rich, +the utility of thrift among the poor, his remarks +were full of point, clearness, and good sense, but +he seldom launched out into the wider sea of +economic theory. He took a first-class in mathematics +at Oxford, at the same time as his first +in classics, but did not pursue the subject in +later life. Regarding the sciences of experiment +and observation, he seemed to feel as little +curiosity as any educated man who notes the +enormous part they play in the modern world +can feel. Sayings of his have been quoted which +show that he imperfectly comprehended the character +of the evidence they rely upon and of the +methods they employ. On one occasion he +horrified a dinner-table of younger friends by +refusing to accept some of the most certain conclusions +of modern geology. No doubt he belonged, +as Lord Derby (the Prime Minister) once said of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_471' name='page_471'></a>471</span> +himself, to a pre-scientific age. Perhaps he was +unconsciously biassed by the notion that such +sciences as geology and biology, for instance, were +being used by some students to sap the foundations +of revealed religion. But I can recall +no sign of disposition to dissuade free inquiry +either into those among the sciences of nature +which have been supposed to touch theology, or +into the date, authorship, and authority of the +books of the Bible. He had faith not only in his +creed, but in God as a God of truth, and in the +power of research to elicit truth.</p> +<p>General propositions are dangerous, yet it +seems safe to observe that great men have +seldom been obscurantists or persecutors. Either +the sympathy with intellectual effort which is +natural to a powerful intellect, or the sense that +free inquiry, though it may be checked by repression +for a certain time or within a certain +area, will ultimately have its course, dissuades +them from that attempt to dam up the stream of +thought which smaller minds regard as the obvious +expedient for saving souls or institutions.</p> +<p>It ought to be added, for this was a remarkable +feature of his character, that he had the deepest +reverence for the great poets and philosophers, +placing the career of the statesman on a far lower +plane than that of those who rule the world by +their thoughts enshrined in literature. He expressed +in a striking letter to Tennyson’s eldest son +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_472' name='page_472'></a>472</span> +his sense of the immense superiority of the poet’s +life and work. Once, in the lobby of the House +of Commons, seeing his countenance saddened by +the troubles of Ireland, I told him, in order to +divert his thoughts, how some one had recently +discovered that Dante had in his last years been +appointed at Ravenna to a lectureship which +raised him above the pinch of want. Mr. Gladstone’s +face lit up at once, and he said, “How +strange it is to think that these great souls whose +words are a beacon-light to all the generations +that have come after them, should have had +cares and anxieties to vex them in their daily +life, just like the rest of us common mortals.” +The phrase reminded me that a few days before +I had heard Mr. Darwin, in dwelling upon the +pleasure a visit paid by Mr. Gladstone had +given him, say, “And he talked just as if he had +been an ordinary person like one of ourselves.” +The two great men were alike unconscious of +their greatness.</p> +<p>It was an unspeakable benefit to Mr. Gladstone +that his love of letters and learning enabled him +to find in the pursuit of knowledge a relief from +anxieties and a solace under disappointments. +Without some such relief his fiery and restless +spirit would have worn itself out. He lived two +lives—the life of the statesman and the life of the +student, and passed swiftly from the one to the +other, dismissing when he sat down to his books +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_473' name='page_473'></a>473</span> +all the cares of politics. But he led a third +life also, the secret life of the soul. Religion +was of all things that which had the strongest +hold upon his thoughts and feelings. Nothing +but his father’s opposition prevented him from +becoming a clergyman when he quitted the University. +Never thereafter did he cease to take +the warmest interest in everything that affected +the Christian Church. He lost his seat for Oxford +University by the votes of the country clergy, +who formed the bulk of the constituency. He incurred +the displeasure of four-fifths of the Anglican +communion by disestablishing the Protestant +Episcopal Church in Ireland, and from 1868 to the +end of his life found nearly all the clerical force +of the English establishment arrayed against him, +while his warmest support came from the Nonconformists +of England and the Presbyterians of +Scotland. Yet nothing affected his devotion to +the Church in which he had been brought up, nor +to the body of Anglo-Catholic doctrine he had +imbibed as an undergraduate. After an attack +of influenza which had left him very weak in the +spring of 1891, he endangered his life by attending +a meeting on behalf of the Colonial Bishoprics +Fund, for which he had spoken fifty years before. +His theological opinions tinged his views upon +political subjects. They filled him with dislike of +the legalisation of marriage with a deceased wife’s +sister; they made him a vehement opponent of +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_474' name='page_474'></a>474</span> +the bill which established the English Divorce +Court in 1857, and a watchfully hostile critic of +all divorce legislation in America afterwards. +Some of his friends traced to the same cause his +less than adequate appreciation of German literature +(though he admired Goethe and Schiller) and +even his political coldness towards Prussia and +afterwards towards the German Empire. He +could not forget that Germany had been the +fountain of rationalism, while German Evangelical +Protestantism was more schismatic and farther +removed from the mediæval Catholic Church than +it pleased him to deem the Church of England to +be. He had an exceedingly high sense of the +duty of purity of life and of the sanctity of +domestic relations, and his rigid ideas of decorum +inspired so much awe that it used to be said to a +person who had told an anecdote with ever so +slight a tinge of impropriety, “How many thousands +of pounds would you take to tell that to +Gladstone?” When living in the country, it was +his practice to attend daily morning service in +the parish church, and on Sunday to read in +church the lessons for the day; and he rarely, if +ever, transgressed his rule against Sunday labour. +Religious feeling, coupled with a system of firm +dogmatic beliefs, was the mainspring of his life, a +guiding light in perplexities, a source of strength +in adverse fortune, a consolation in sorrow, a +beacon of hope beyond the failures and disappointments +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_475' name='page_475'></a>475</span> +of this present world. He did not +make what is commonly called a profession of +religion, and talked little about it in general +society, although always ready to plunge into a +magazine controversy when Christianity was +assailed. But those who knew him best knew +that he was always referring current questions to, +and trying his own conduct by, a religious +standard. He believed in the efficacy of prayer, +and sought through prayer for strength and for +direction in the affairs of state. He was a remarkable +example of the coexistence together +with a Christian virtue of a quality which +Catholic theologians treat as a mortal sin. He +was an exceedingly proud man, yet an exceedingly +humble Christian. With a high regard for +his own dignity and a sensitiveness to any imputation +on his honour, he was deeply conscious of +his imperfections in the eye of God, realising the +weakness and sinfulness of human nature with +a mediæval intensity. The language of self-depreciation +he was wont to use, sometimes +deemed unreal, expressed his genuine sense of +the contrast between the religious ideal he set +up and his own attainment. And the tolerance +which he extended to those who attacked him +or who had (as he thought) behaved ill in public +life was largely due to this pervading sense of the +frailty of human character, and of the inextricable +mixture in conduct of good and bad motives. +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_476' name='page_476'></a>476</span> +“It is always best to take the charitable view,” +he once observed when I had quoted to him the +saying of Dean Church that Mark Pattison had +painted himself too black in his autobiography—“always +best,” adding, with grim emphasis, +“especially in politics.”</p> +<p>In this indulgent view, more evident in his +later years, and the more remarkable because +his expressions were often too vehement, there +was nothing of the cynical “man of the world” +acceptance of a low standard as the only possible +standard, for his moral earnestness was as fervent +at eighty-eight as it had been at thirty, and he +retained a simplicity and an unwillingness to suspect +sinister motives, singular in one who had +seen so much. Although accessible and frank in +the ordinary converse of society, he was in reality +a reserved man; not shy, stiff, and externally +cold, like Peel, nor always standing on a pedestal +of dignity, like the younger Pitt, but revealing +his deepest thoughts only to a few intimate +friends, and treating others with a courteous +kindliness which, though it put them at their +ease, did not encourage them to approach nearer. +Thus, while he was admired by the mass of his +followers, and beloved by the small inner group +of family friends, the majority of his colleagues, +official subordinates, and political or ecclesiastical +associates, would have hesitated to give him any of +friendship’s confidences. Though quick to mark +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_477' name='page_477'></a>477</span> +and acknowledge good service, or to offer to a junior +an opportunity of distinction, many deemed him +too much occupied with his own thoughts to +show interest in his disciples, or to bestow those +counsels which a young man prizes from his +chief. But for the warmth of his devotion to a +few early friends and the reverence he paid to +their memory, a reverence touchingly shown in +the article on Arthur Hallam which he published +near the end of his own life, sixty-five years after +Hallam’s death, there might have seemed to be +a measure of truth in the judgment that he cared +less for men than for ideas and causes. Those, +however, who marked the pang which the departure +to the Roman Church of his friend Hope +Scott caused him, those who in later days noted +the enthusiasm with which he would speak of +Lord Althorp, his opponent, and of Lord Aberdeen, +his chief, dwelling upon the truthfulness and +uprightness of the former and the amiability of +the latter, knew that the impression of detachment +he gave wronged the sensibility of his own +heart. Of how few who have lived for more than +sixty years in the full sight of their countrymen, +and have been as party leaders exposed to angry +and sometimes spiteful criticism, can it be said +that there stands on record against them no +malignant word and no vindictive act! This +was due not perhaps entirely to natural sweetness +of disposition, but rather to self-control +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_478' name='page_478'></a>478</span> +and to a certain largeness of soul which would +not condescend to anything mean or petty. +Pride, though it may be a sin, is to most of us a +useful, to some an indispensable, buttress of virtue. +Nor should it be forgotten that the perfectly happy +life which he led at home, cared for in everything +by a devoted wife, kept far from him those domestic +troubles which have soured the temper and embittered +the judgments of not a few famous men. +Reviewing his whole career, and summing up the +concurrent impressions and recollections of those +who knew him best, this dignity is the feature +which dwells most in the mind, as the outline of +some majestic Alp thrills one from afar when all +the lesser beauties of glen and wood, of crag and +glacier, have faded in the distance. As elevation +was the note of his oratory, so was magnanimity +the note of his character.</p> +<p>The Greek maxim that no one can be called +happy till his life is closed must, in the case of +statesmen, be extended to warn us from the +attempt to fix a man’s place in history till a +generation has arisen to whom he is a mere +name, not a familiar figure to be loved or +hated. Few reputations made in politics so far +retain their lustre that curiosity continues to +play round the person when those who can remember +him living have departed. Dante has +in immortal stanzas contrasted the fame of Provenzano +Salvani that sounded through all Tuscany +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_479' name='page_479'></a>479</span> +while he lived with the faint whispers of his name +heard in his own Siena forty years after his death.<a name='FNanchor_0066' id='FNanchor_0066'></a><a href='#Footnote_0066' class='fnanchor'>[75]</a> +So out of all the men who have held a foremost +place in English public life in the nineteenth +century there are but six or seven—Pitt, Fox, +Wellington, Peel, Disraeli, possibly Canning, or +O’Connell, or Melbourne—whose names are to-day +upon our lips. The great poet or the great +artist lives as long as his books or his pictures; +the statesman, like the singer or the actor, +begins to be forgotten so soon as his voice is +still, unless he has so dominated the men of +his own time, and made himself a part of his +country’s history, that his personal character +is indissolubly linked to the events the course +of which he helped to determine. Tried by +this test, Mr. Gladstone’s fame seems destined +to endure. His eloquence will soon become +merely a tradition, for his printed speeches do not +preserve its charm. If some of his books continue +to be read, it will be rather because they are his +than in respect of any permanent contribution they +have made to knowledge. The wisdom of his +policy, foreign and domestic, will have to be judged, +not only by the consequences we see, but also by +other consequences still hidden in the future. +Yet among his acts there are some with which +history cannot fail to concern herself, and which +will keep fresh the memory of their author’s +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_480' name='page_480'></a>480</span> +energy and courage. Whoever follows the annals +of England during the memorable years from 1843 +to 1894 will meet his name on almost every page, +will feel how great must have been the force of an +intellect that could so interpenetrate the story of +its time, and will seek to know something of +the dauntless figure that rose always conspicuous +above the struggling throng.</p> +<p>There is a passage in the <i>Odyssey</i> where the +seer Theoclymenus says, in describing a vision +of death: “The sun has perished out of heaven.” +To Englishmen, Mr. Gladstone had been like a +sun which, sinking slowly, had grown larger as he +sank, and filled the sky with radiance even while +he trembled on the verge of the horizon. There +were men of ability and men of renown, but there +was no one comparable to him in fame and power +and honour. When he departed the light seemed +to have died out of the sky.</p> +<hr class='pb' /> +<p style='font-family:sans-serif; margin-top:1.4em;'>Footnotes</p> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_1' id='Footnote_1'></a><a href='#FNanchor_1'><span class='label'>[1]</span></a> +<p>No “authorised” life of Lord Beaconsfield, nor indeed any life commensurate +with the part he played in English politics, has yet appeared.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0001' id='Footnote_0001'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0001'><span class='label'>[2]</span></a> +<p>Disraeli’s family claimed to be of Spanish origin, but had come from +Italy to England shortly before 1748.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0002' id='Footnote_0002'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0002'><span class='label'>[3]</span></a> +<p>There are few legal allusions in his novels, fewer in proportion than +in Shakespeare’s plays, but an ingenious travesty of the English use of +legal fictions may be found in the <i>Voyage of Captain Popanilla</i>, a satire +on the English constitution and government. Popanilla, who is to be +tried for treason, is, to his astonishment, indicted for killing a camelopard.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0003' id='Footnote_0003'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0003'><span class='label'>[4]</span></a> +<p>That historical interest he did feel deeply. One might almost say +of him that he was a Christian because he was a Jew, for Christianity was +to him the proper development of the ancient religion of Israel. “The +Jews,” he observes in the <i>Life of Lord George Bentinck</i>, “represent the +Semitic principle, all that is most spiritual in our nature.... It is deplorable +that several millions of Jews still persist in believing only a part of +their religion.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0004' id='Footnote_0004'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0004'><span class='label'>[5]</span></a> +<p>Though it has been maintained that in the Dark and Middle Ages a +considerable number of Gentiles found their way into Jewish communities +and became Judaised.</p> +<p>The high average of intellectual power among the Jews need not be +attributed to purity of race; it is sufficiently explained by their history. +Nor is it clear that where two of the more advanced races are mixed by +intermarriage, the product is inferior to either of the parent stocks. On +the contrary, such a mixture, <i>e.g.</i> of Teutonic and Slavonic blood, or of +Celtic and Teutonic, gives a result at least equal in capacity to either of +the pure-blooded races which have been so commingled.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0005' id='Footnote_0005'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0005'><span class='label'>[6]</span></a> +<p>He had an intellectual arrogance, which made him dislike what +may be called the Radical conception of human equality. In the <i>Life +of Lord George Bentinck</i> he remarks, “The Jews are a living and the +most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern +times, the natural equality of man.... All the tendencies of the Jewish +race are conservative. Their bias is to religion, property, and natural +aristocracy.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0006' id='Footnote_0006'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0006'><span class='label'>[7]</span></a> +<p>On one occasion he went so far as to deny that he had asked Peel for +office, relying on the fact that the letter which contained the request was +marked “private,” so that Peel could not use it to disprove his statement +(<i>Letters of Sir Robert Peel</i>, by C. S. Parker, vol. ii. p. 486; vol. +iii. pp. 347, 348).</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0007' id='Footnote_0007'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0007'><span class='label'>[8]</span></a> +<p>See Sir S. Northcote’s report of a conversation with Disraeli in his +last years (<i>Life of Sir Stafford Northcote</i>, vol. ii.).</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0008' id='Footnote_0008'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0008'><span class='label'>[9]</span></a> +<p>In the <i>Life of Lord George Bentinck</i> (written shortly after Peel’s +death), Disraeli, after dilating upon the loyalty which the Tory aristocracy +had displayed towards Peel, observes, “An aristocracy hesitates before it +yields its confidence, but it never does so grudgingly.... In political +connections the social feeling mingles with the principle of honour which +governs gentlemen.... Such a following is usually cordial and faithful. +An aristocracy is rather apt to exaggerate the qualities and magnify the +importance of a plebeian leader.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0009' id='Footnote_0009'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0009'><span class='label'>[10]</span></a> +<p>When he did set himself to examine the condition of the people, the +diagnosis, if not always correct, was always suggestive, <i>e.g.</i> the account of +the manufacturing districts given in <i>Sybil, or the Two Nations</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0010' id='Footnote_0010'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0010'><span class='label'>[11]</span></a> +<p>“The old Jew, that is the man.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0011' id='Footnote_0011'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0011'><span class='label'>[12]</span></a> +<p>In the <i>Life of Lord George Bentinck</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0012' id='Footnote_0012'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0012'><span class='label'>[13]</span></a> +<p><span class='greek' title='Oiô pepnusthai, toi de skiai aïssousin'>Οἴῳ πεπνῦσθαι, τοὶ δὲ σκιαὶ ἀίσσουσιν</span> (<i>Od.</i> x. 495). Used of Tiresias, +in the world of disembodied spirits.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0013' id='Footnote_0013'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0013'><span class='label'>[14]</span></a> +<p>To defend Disraeli by arguing that his policy had not a fair chance +because his colleagues did not allow him to carry it through is to admit +another error not less grave, for the path he took was one on which no +minister ought to have entered unless satisfied that the Cabinet and the +country would let him follow it to the end.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0014' id='Footnote_0014'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0014'><span class='label'>[15]</span></a> +<p><i>Inf.</i> vii. 77.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_16' id='Footnote_16'></a><a href='#FNanchor_16'><span class='label'>[16]</span></a> +<p>A <i>Life of Dean Stanley</i>, in two volumes, begun by Theodore +Walrond, continued by Dean Bradley, and completed by Mr. R. E. +Prothero, appeared in 1893.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0015' id='Footnote_0015'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0015'><span class='label'>[17]</span></a> +<p>When J. S. Mill was a candidate for Westminster in 1868, Stanley +published a letter announcing his support, partly out of personal respect +for Mill, partly because it gave him an opportunity of expressing an +opinion on the Irish Church question, and of reprobating the charge of +atheism which had been brought against Mill.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0016' id='Footnote_0016'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0016'><span class='label'>[18]</span></a> +<p>As I have referred to the American Civil War, it is worth adding +that there were no places in England where the varying fortunes of that +tremendous struggle were followed with a more intense interest than in +Oxford and Cambridge, and none in which so large a proportion of the +educated class sympathised with the cause of the North. Mr. Goldwin +Smith led the section which took that view, and which included three-fourths +of the best talent in Oxford. Among the younger men Green was +the most conspicuous for his ardour on behalf of the principles of human +equality and freedom. He followed and watched every move in the +military game. No Massachusetts Abolitionist welcomed the fall of +Vicksburg with a keener joy. He used to say that the whole future of +humanity was involved in the triumph of the Federal arms.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_19' id='Footnote_19'></a><a href='#FNanchor_19'><span class='label'>[19]</span></a> +<p>An admirable life of Archbishop Tait by his son-in-law, Dr. R. T. +Davidson (now Archbishop of Canterbury), and Canon Benham appeared +in 1891.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0017' id='Footnote_0017'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0017'><span class='label'>[20]</span></a> +<p>They thought his public action scarcely consistent with the language +he had used to Temple in private.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_21' id='Footnote_21'></a><a href='#FNanchor_21'><span class='label'>[21]</span></a> +<p>Trollope’s autobiography, published in 1883, is a good specimen of +self-portraiture, candid, straightforward, and healthy, and leaves an +agreeable impression of the writer. Dr. Richard Garnett has written well +of him in the <i>Dictionary of National Biography</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_22' id='Footnote_22'></a><a href='#FNanchor_22'><span class='label'>[22]</span></a> +<p>This sketch was written in 1883. A volume of Green’s Letters, with +a short connecting biography by Sir Leslie Stephen, was published in +1901. The letters are extremely good reading, the biography faithful and +graceful.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0018' id='Footnote_0018'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0018'><span class='label'>[23]</span></a> +<p>Sir George Young and I were the other members.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0019' id='Footnote_0019'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0019'><span class='label'>[24]</span></a> +<p>At one time, however, he learnt a little geology from his friend +Professor Dawkins, perceiving its bearings on history.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0020' id='Footnote_0020'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0020'><span class='label'>[25]</span></a> +<p>2 Sam. xvi. 23.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0021' id='Footnote_0021'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0021'><span class='label'>[26]</span></a> +<p><i>Odyss.</i> viii. 274: “And upon the anvil-stand he set the mighty +anvil; and he forged the links that could be neither broken nor loosed, so +that they should stay firm in their place.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0022' id='Footnote_0022'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0022'><span class='label'>[27]</span></a> +<p>Lord Justice James said of his colleague that he had only one +defect as a judge: “He was too anxious to convince counsel that they +were wrong, when he thought their contention unsound, seeming to +forget that counsel are paid not to be convinced.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0023' id='Footnote_0023'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0023'><span class='label'>[28]</span></a> +<p>No biography of Lord Cairns has (so far as I know) appeared—a +singular fact, considering the brilliancy of his career, and considering the +tendency which now prevails to bestow this kind of honour on many +persons of the second or even the third rank. One reason may be that +Cairns, great though he was, never won personal popularity even with his +own political party or among his contemporaries at the bar, and was to the +general public no more than a famous name.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0024' id='Footnote_0024'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0024'><span class='label'>[29]</span></a> +<p>The reign of King Richard the First.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0025' id='Footnote_0025'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0025'><span class='label'>[30]</span></a> +<p>Two Lives of Dr. Fraser have been published, one (in 1887) by +the late Judge Hughes, the other, which gives a fuller impression of his +personal character, by the Rev. J. W. Diggle (1891).</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0026' id='Footnote_0026'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0026'><span class='label'>[31]</span></a> +<p>He was a good judge of horses, and had in his youth been fond of +hunting.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0027' id='Footnote_0027'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0027'><span class='label'>[32]</span></a> +<p>A clergyman of his diocese had once, under the greatest provocation, +knocked down a person who had insulted him, and the bishop wrote +him a letter of reproof pointing out (among other things) that, exposed as +the Church of England was to much criticism on all hands, her ministers +ought to be very careful in their demeanour. The offender replied by +saying, “I must regretfully admit that being grossly insulted, and forgetting +in the heat of the moment the critical position of the Church of +England, I did knock the man down, etc.” Fraser, delighted with this +turning of the tables on himself, told me the anecdote with great glee, and +invited the clergyman to stay with him not long afterwards.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0028' id='Footnote_0028'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0028'><span class='label'>[33]</span></a> +<p>He was himself aware that this caused displeasure. In his latest +Charge, delivered some months before his death, he said: “I am +charged, amongst other grievous sins, with that of thinking not unkindly, +and speaking not unfavourably, of Dissenters. I don’t profess to love +dissent, but I have received innumerable kindnesses from Dissenters. +Why should I abuse them? Why should I call them hard names? +Remembering how Nonconformity was made—no doubt sometimes by +self-will and pride and prejudice and ignorance, but far more often by the +Church’s supineness, neglect, and intolerance in days long since gone by, +of which we have not yet paid the full penalty—though, as I have said, +I love not the thing, I cannot speak harshly of it.”</p> +<p>That a defence was needed may seem strange to those who do not +know England.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_34' id='Footnote_34'></a><a href='#FNanchor_34'><span class='label'>[34]</span></a> +<p>A <i>Life of Lord Iddesleigh</i>, written by Mr. Andrew Lang, presents +Northcote’s character and career with fairness and discrimination.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0029' id='Footnote_0029'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0029'><span class='label'>[35]</span></a> +<p>The <i>Life of Parnell</i>, by Mr. R. Barry O’Brien, has taken rank among +the best biographies of the last half-century.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0030' id='Footnote_0030'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0030'><span class='label'>[36]</span></a> +<p>An anecdote was told at the time that when he found himself in the +prison yard at Kilmainham, he said, in a sort of soliloquy, “I shall live +yet to dance upon those two old men’s graves.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_37' id='Footnote_37'></a><a href='#FNanchor_37'><span class='label'>[37]</span></a> +<p>An excellent Life of Freeman has been written by his friend Mr. +W. R. W. Stephens, afterwards Dean of Winchester, whose death while +these pages were passing through the press has caused the deepest regret +to all who had the opportunity of knowing his literary gifts and his +lovable character.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0031' id='Footnote_0031'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0031'><span class='label'>[38]</span></a> +<p>The scholars of Trinity were then (1843) all High Churchmen, +and never dined in hall on Fridays. Fourteen years later there was not a +single High Churchman among them. Ten or fifteen years afterwards +Anglo-Catholic sentiment was again strong. Freeman said that his revulsion +against Tractarianism began from a conversation with one of his +fellow-scholars, who had remarked that it was a pity there had been a +flaw in the consecration of some Swedish bishops in the sixteenth century, +for this had imperilled the salvation of all Swedes since that time. He +was startled, and began to reconsider his position.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0032' id='Footnote_0032'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0032'><span class='label'>[39]</span></a> +<p>Having had about the same time a brush with George Anthony +Denison (Archdeacon of Taunton), and a less friendly passage of arms with +James Anthony Froude, he wrote to me in 1870: “I am greater than +Cicero, who was smiter of one Antonius. I venture to think that I have +whopped the whole <i>Gens Antonia</i>—first Anthony pure and simple, which +is Trollope; secondly, James Anthony, whom I believe myself to have +smitten, as Cnut did Eadric swiðe rihtlice, in the matter of St. Hugh; +thirdly, George Anthony, with whom I fought again last Tuesday, carrying +at our Education Board a resolution in favour of Forster’s bill.” Trollope +and he became warm friends. Froude he heartily disliked, not, I think, +on any personal grounds, but because he thought Froude indifferent to +truth, and was incensed by the defence of Henry VIII.’s crimes.</p> +<p>It may be added that Freeman, much as he detested Henry VIII., used +to observe that Henry had a sort of legal conscience, because he always +wished his murders to be done by Act of Parliament, and that the earlier +and better part of Henry’s reign ought not to be forgotten. He was fond of +quoting the euphemism with which an old Oxford professor of ecclesiastical +history concluded his account of the sovereign whom, in respect of his relation +to the Church of England, it seemed proper to handle gently: “The +later years of this great monarch were clouded by domestic troubles.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0033' id='Footnote_0033'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0033'><span class='label'>[40]</span></a> +<p>“The heart makes the theologian.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_41' id='Footnote_41'></a><a href='#FNanchor_41'><span class='label'>[41]</span></a> +<p>A carefully written life of Lord Sherbrooke (in two volumes) by Mr. +Patchett Martin was published in 1896. The most interesting part of +it is the short fragment of autobiography with which it begins, and which +carries the story down to Lowe’s arrival in Australia.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0034' id='Footnote_0034'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0034'><span class='label'>[42]</span></a> +<p>In his autobiography he writes, “With a quiet temper and a real +wish to please, I have been obliged all my life to submit to an amount of +unpopularity which I really did not deserve, and to feel myself condemned +for what were really physical rather than moral deficiencies.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0035' id='Footnote_0035'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0035'><span class='label'>[43]</span></a> +<p>There was an anecdote current in the University of Oxford down to +my time that when Lowe was examining in the examination which the +statutes call “Responsions,” the dons “Little-go,” and the undergraduates +“Smalls,” a friend coming in while the <i>viva voce</i> was in progress, asked +him how he was getting on. “Excellently,” said Lowe; “five men +plucked already, and the sixth very shaky.” Another tale, not likely to +have been invented, relates that when he and several members of the +then Liberal Ministry were staying in Dublin with the Lord Lieutenant, +and had taken an excursion into the Wicklow hills, they found themselves +one afternoon obliged to wait for half an hour at a railway station. To +pass the time, Lowe forthwith engaged in a dispute about the charge with +the car-drivers who had brought them, a dispute which soon became hot +and noisy, to the delight of Lowe, but to the horror of the old Lord +Chancellor, who was one of the party.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0036' id='Footnote_0036'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0036'><span class='label'>[44]</span></a> +<p><i>Essays on Reform</i>, published in 1867.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0037' id='Footnote_0037'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0037'><span class='label'>[45]</span></a> +<p>The then borough qualification, which Mr. Gladstone’s Bill proposed +to reduce to £7.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0038' id='Footnote_0038'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0038'><span class='label'>[46]</span></a> +<p>Mr. Gladstone said to me in 1897 that the extension of the suffrage +had, in his judgment, improved the quality of legislation, making it more +regardful of the interests of the body of the people, but had not improved +the quality of the House of Commons.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0039' id='Footnote_0039'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0039'><span class='label'>[47]</span></a> +<p>Sir H. S. Maine’s <i>Quarterly Review</i> articles, published in a volume +under the title of <i>Popular Government</i>, come nearest to being a literary +presentation of the case against democracy, but they are, with all their +ingenuity and grace of style, so provokingly vague and loosely expressed +that there can seldom be found in them a proposition with which one can +agree, or from which one can differ. E. de Laveleye’s well-known book +is not much more substantial, but instruction may (as respects France) +be found in the late Edmond Schérer’s <i>De la Démocratie</i>, and (as respects +England and the United States) in M. Ostrogorski’s recent book, <i>Democracy +and the Organisation of Political Parties</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0040' id='Footnote_0040'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0040'><span class='label'>[48]</span></a> +<p>No life of Robertson Smith has yet been written, but it is hoped that +one may be prepared by his intimate friend, Mr. J. Sutherland Black. A +portrait of him (by his friend Sir George Reid, late President of the Royal +Scottish Academy) hangs in the library of Christ’s College, Cambridge, to +which Smith’s collection of Oriental books was presented by his friends, +and another has been placed in the Divinity College of the United Free +Presbyterian Church at Aberdeen. A memorial window has been set up +in the chapel of the University of Aberdeen, where he won his first distinctions. +I have to thank my friend Mr. Black for some suggestions he +has kindly made after perusing this sketch.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0041' id='Footnote_0041'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0041'><span class='label'>[49]</span></a> +<p>There was an aged Jewish scholar who came now and then to +Cambridge in those days, and who, as sometimes happens, disliked +other scholars labouring in the same field. He was (so it used to be said) +one of the few who knew exactly how the word which we write Jehovah +or Iahve ought to be pronounced, and it was believed that he had +solemnly cursed Wright, Smith, and a third Semitic scholar in the Sacred +Name. All three died soon afterwards.</p> +<p>What would have been thought of this in the Middle Ages!</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0042' id='Footnote_0042'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0042'><span class='label'>[50]</span></a> +<p><i>Parad.</i> x. 136, of Sigier, “Sillogizzó invidiosi veri.”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0043' id='Footnote_0043'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0043'><span class='label'>[51]</span></a> +<p>It is hoped that a life of Sidgwick, together with a selection from +his letters, may before long be published.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0044' id='Footnote_0044'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0044'><span class='label'>[52]</span></a> +<p>It was his aim to avoid as much as possible technical terms or phrases +whose meaning was not plain to the average reader. An anecdote was +current that once when, in conducting a university examination, he was +perusing the papers of a candidate who had darkened the subject by the +use of extreme Hegelian phraseology, he turned to his co-examiner and +said, “I can see that this is nonsense, but is it the right kind of nonsense?”</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'> +<a name='Footnote_53' id='Footnote_53'></a><a href='#FNanchor_53'><span class='label'>[53]</span></a> +<p>Since this sketch was written a very interesting <i>Life of Edward +Bowen</i> by his nephew (the Hon. and Rev. W. E. Bowen) has appeared. +Some of his (too few) essays and a collection of his school-songs are +appended to it.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0045' id='Footnote_0045'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0045'><span class='label'>[54]</span></a> +<p>Mr. R. Bosworth Smith.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0046' id='Footnote_0046'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0046'><span class='label'>[55]</span></a> +<p>It is printed in the <i>Life</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0047' id='Footnote_0047'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0047'><span class='label'>[56]</span></a> +<p>“Chiffers” is the typical would-be imitator of Arnold.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0048' id='Footnote_0048'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0048'><span class='label'>[57]</span></a> +<p>He remarked once that he had so nearly exhausted the battlefields +of the past that he must begin to devote himself to the battlefields of the +future.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0049' id='Footnote_0049'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0049'><span class='label'>[58]</span></a> +<p>The Tammany leaders had him repeatedly arrested, usually on +Sunday mornings (that being the day on which it was least easy to find +bail) for alleged criminal libels upon them. These prosecutions, threatened +in the hope of intimidating him, never went further.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0050' id='Footnote_0050'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0050'><span class='label'>[59]</span></a> +<p>A Mugwump is in the Algonquin tongue an aged chief or wise man, +and the name was meant to ridicule the <i>ex cathedra</i> manner ascribed to +the <i>Evening Post</i>.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0051' id='Footnote_0051'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0051'><span class='label'>[60]</span></a> +<p>This library, bought by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, was presented by him +to Mr. John Morley, and by the latter to the University of Cambridge.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0052' id='Footnote_0052'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0052'><span class='label'>[61]</span></a> +<p>The phrase is Professor Maitland’s.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0053' id='Footnote_0053'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0053'><span class='label'>[62]</span></a> +<p>I owe this quotation to a letter of Sir M. E. Grant Duff’s published +soon after Lord Acton’s death.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0054' id='Footnote_0054'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0054'><span class='label'>[63]</span></a> +<p>“Gled” is a kite or hawk. The name was Gladstones till Mr. +Gladstone’s father dropped the final s.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0055' id='Footnote_0055'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0055'><span class='label'>[64]</span></a> +<p>One of his most intimate friends has, I think, said that “he never +knew what it was to be bored.” Fortunate, indeed, would he have been +had this been so; but that one who had watched him long and closely +should make the statement shows how gently bores fared at his hands.</p> +<p>I recollect his once remarking on the capacity for boring possessed by +a gentleman who had been introduced and had talked for some fifteen +minutes to him; but his own manner through the conversation had betrayed +no impatience.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0056' id='Footnote_0056'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0056'><span class='label'>[65]</span></a> +<p>Sermons belong to a somewhat different category, else I should have +to add the discourses of a few great preachers, such as Robert Hall, J. H. +Newman, Phillips Brooks.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0057' id='Footnote_0057'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0057'><span class='label'>[66]</span></a> +<p>Though one of Macaulay’s speeches (that against the exclusion of the +Master of the Rolls from the House of Commons) had the rare honour of +turning votes.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0058' id='Footnote_0058'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0058'><span class='label'>[67]</span></a> +<p>“He said that this was the hardest battle of men he had entered,” +<i>Iliad</i> vi. 185.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0059' id='Footnote_0059'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0059'><span class='label'>[68]</span></a> +<p>His physical courage was no less evident than his moral. For two +or three years his life was threatened, and policemen were told off to +guard him wherever he went. He disliked this protection so much +(though the Home Office thought it necessary) that he used to escape from +the House of Commons by a little-frequented exit, give the policemen the +slip, and stroll home to his residence along the Thames Embankment in +the small hours of the morning. Fear was not in his nature.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0060' id='Footnote_0060'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0060'><span class='label'>[69]</span></a> +<p>The late Protestant Episcopal Primate of Ireland said that Disestablishment +had proved a blessing to his Church; and this would seem +to be now the general view of Irish Protestants.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0061' id='Footnote_0061'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0061'><span class='label'>[70]</span></a> +<p>His abdication of leadership in 1875 was meant to be final, though +when the urgency of Eastern affairs had drawn him back into strife, the +old ardour revived, and he resumed the place of Prime Minister in 1880. +It has been often said that he would have done better to retire from public +life in 1880, or in 1885, yet the most striking proofs both of his courage +and of his physical energy were given in the latest part of his career.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0062' id='Footnote_0062'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0062'><span class='label'>[71]</span></a> +<p>For instance, he recommended Dr. Stubbs for a bishopric and Sir +John Holker for a lord justiceship, knowing both of them to be Tories.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0063' id='Footnote_0063'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0063'><span class='label'>[72]</span></a> +<p>His respect and regard for Mr. Bright were entirely unaffected by the +fact that Mr. Bright’s opposition to the Home Rule Bill of 1886 had been +the chief cause of its defeat.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0064' id='Footnote_0064'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0064'><span class='label'>[73]</span></a> +<p>Usually over-anxious to vindicate his own consistency, he showed on +one occasion a capacity for recognising the humorous side of a position +into which he had been brought. In a debate which arose in 1891 +frequent references had been made to a former speech in which he had +pronounced a highly-coloured panegyric upon the Church of England in +Wales, the disestablishment of which he had subsequently become willing +to support. He replied, “Many references have been made to a former +speech of mine on this subject, and I am not prepared to deny that in that +speech, when closely scrutinised, there may appear to be present some +element of exaggeration.” The House dissolved in laughter, and no +further reference was made to the old speech.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0065' id='Footnote_0065'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0065'><span class='label'>[74]</span></a> +<p>His Oxford contemporary and friend, the late Mr. Milnes Gaskell, told +me that when Mr. Gladstone was undergoing his <i>viva voce</i> examination for +his degree, the examiner, satisfied with the candidate’s answers on a particular +matter, said, “And now, Mr. Gladstone, we will leave that part +of the subject.” “No,” replied the examinee, “we will, if you please, not +leave it yet.” Whereupon he proceeded to pour forth a further flood of +knowledge and disquisition.</p> +</div> +<div class='footnote'><a name='Footnote_0066' id='Footnote_0066'></a><a href='#FNanchor_0066'><span class='label'>[75]</span></a> +<p><i>Purgat.</i> xi. 100-126.</p> +</div> +<hr class='pb' /> +<div class='chsp'> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_481' name='page_481'></a>481</span> +<a name='INDEX' id='INDEX'></a> +<h2>INDEX</h2> +</div> +<div style='font-size:0.9em;'> +<p class='lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Acton, John Edward Emerich Dalberg, Lord—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_382'>382–84</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_399'>399</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>critical taste of, <a href='#page_390'>390</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>family of, <a href='#page_382'>382</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>history, view of, <a href='#page_391'>391–92</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>view of study of, <a href='#page_394'>394–95</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>learning of, <a href='#page_386'>386–89</a>, <a href='#page_392'>392</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>liberty, history of, projected by, <a href='#page_395'>395–96</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>libraries of, <a href='#page_388'>388–89</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0051'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political opinions of, <a href='#page_384'>384</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>style of, <a href='#page_396'>396–97</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>thoroughness of, <a href='#page_390'>390</a>, <a href='#page_393'>393–95</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>University work of, <a href='#page_397'>397–98</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>writings of, <a href='#page_395'>395</a><br /> +<br /> +American Civil War, <a href='#page_55'>55</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57</a>, <a href='#page_90'>90</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0016'>note</a>. <i>See also</i> <a href='#Index_United_States'>United States</a><br /> +<br /> +Arnold, Dr., <a href='#page_343'>343</a>, <a href='#page_346'>346</a><br /> +<br /> +Austen, Jane, <a href='#page_127'>127</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em"><a name='Index_Beaconsfield' id='Index_Beaconsfield'></a>Beaconsfield, Benjamin Disraeli, Lord—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Cairns valued by, <a href='#page_186'>186–87</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_3'>3–16</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of—<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>ambition, <a href='#page_21'>21–22</a>, <a href='#page_26'>26</a>, <a href='#page_30'>30–31</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span><i>bonhomie</i>, <a href='#page_32'>32</a>, <a href='#page_34'>34</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>courage, <a href='#page_11'>11</a>, <a href='#page_25'>25–26</a>, <a href='#page_65'>65</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>cynicism, <a href='#page_30'>30</a>, <a href='#page_40'>40–41</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>debating power, <a href='#page_47'>47</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>intellectual congruity, <a href='#page_35'>35–38</a>, <a href='#page_42'>42</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>loyalty, <a href='#page_33'>33</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>self-confidence, <a href='#page_21'>21</a>, <a href='#page_26'>26</a>, <a href='#page_50'>50</a>, <a href='#page_65'>65</a>, <a href='#page_224'>224</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>tactical adroitness, <a href='#page_48'>48–50</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>tenacity, <a href='#page_11'>11</a>, <a href='#page_15'>15</a>, <a href='#page_23'>23–24</a>, <a href='#page_60'>60</a>, <a href='#page_65'>65</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Eastern policy of, <a href='#page_140'>140</a>, <a href='#page_275'>275–76</a>, <a href='#page_300'>300</a>, <a href='#page_356'>356</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>education of, <a href='#page_39'>39</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>epigrammatic phrases of, <a href='#page_41'>41–42</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>estimates regarding, <a href='#page_1'>1–2</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>foreign, <a href='#page_54'>54</a>, <a href='#page_58'>58</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>family of, <a href='#page_3'>3</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone compared with, <a href='#page_418'>418</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a>, <a href='#page_465'>465</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>contrasted with, <a href='#page_422'>422</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Gladstone’s attitude towards, <a href='#page_455'>455–56</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_66'>66–68</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary works of, <a href='#page_4'>4–5</a>, <a href='#page_18'>18–19</a>, <a href='#page_29'>29</a>, <a href='#page_31'>31–33</a>, <a href='#page_35'>35</a>, <a href='#page_41'>41</a>, <a href='#page_43'>43–45</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0009'>52 note</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>quoted, <a href='#Footnote_0003'>21 note</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0005'>25 note</a>, <a href='#page_41'>41</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0008'>50 note</a>, <a href='#page_55'>55</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Lowe and, <a href='#page_34'>34</a>, <a href='#page_302'>302</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Northcote appreciated by, <a href='#page_21'>21</a>, <a href='#page_218'>218</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political views of, <a href='#page_6'>6–8</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>foreign policy of (<i>see also above</i>, Eastern policy), <a href='#page_15'>15</a>, <a href='#page_56'>56</a>, <a href='#page_59'>59</a>, <a href='#page_67'>67</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Stanley and, <a href='#page_81'>81</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>suffrage extension, policy of, <a href='#page_305'>305–306</a>, <a href='#page_309'>309–10</a>, <a href='#page_442'>442</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>otherwise mentioned, <a href='#page_107'>107</a>, <a href='#page_171'>171</a>, <a href='#page_220'>220</a><br /> +<br /> +Bentinck, Lord George, <a href='#page_9'>9</a><br /> +<br /> +Bishops—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>change in type of, <a href='#page_196'>196–98</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>House of Lords, presence in, <a href='#page_112'>112</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>industry of, <a href='#page_199'>199</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_100'>100–101</a>, <a href='#page_103'>103</a><br /> +<br /> +Bismarck, Prince, <a href='#page_54'>54</a><br /> +<br /> +Black, J. Sutherland, <a href='#Footnote_0040'>311 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Bowen, Edward Ernest—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_53'>343 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_345'>345–46</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_360'>360–62</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>death of, <a href='#page_355'>355</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>games, attitude towards, <a href='#page_351'>351–52</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_350'>350</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>views regarding, <a href='#page_353'>353–54</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>military history, fondness for, <a href='#page_357'>357–58</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_482' name='page_482'></a>482</span><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political interests of, <a href='#page_355'>355–57</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>school songs of, <a href='#Footnote_53'>343 note</a>, <a href='#page_359'>359–360</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>teaching methods of, <a href='#page_346'>346–47</a>, <a href='#page_349'>349–350</a>, <a href='#page_354'>354–55</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>training of teachers, views on, <a href='#page_348'>348</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>travel, fondness for, <a href='#page_358'>358</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>walking tours of, <a href='#page_355'>355</a><br /> +<br /> +Bowen, Lord, <a href='#page_345'>345</a>, <a href='#page_359'>359</a><br /> +<br /> +Bright, John, <a href='#page_30'>30</a>, <a href='#page_98'>98</a>, <a href='#page_304'>304</a>, <a href='#page_428'>428–29</a>, <a href='#page_443'>443</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0063'>455 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Bradlaugh, Mr., <a href='#page_437'>437</a><br /> +<br /> +Brooke, Rev. Stopford, quoted, <a href='#page_135'>135–137</a><br /> +<br /> +Brooks, Dr. Phillips, <a href='#page_209'>209</a>, <a href='#page_381'>381</a><br /> +<br /> +Brougham, Lord, <a href='#page_64'>64</a>, <a href='#page_428'>428</a><br /> +<br /> +Browning, Robert, <a href='#page_39'>39</a>, <a href='#page_126'>126</a><br /> +<br /> +Burke, Edmund, <a href='#page_410'>410</a>, <a href='#page_427'>427–28</a>, <a href='#page_440'>440</a><br /> +<br /> +Burney, Miss, <a href='#page_127'>127</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Cairns, Hugh M’Calmont, Earl—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>American Civil War, attitude towards, <a href='#page_57'>57</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_184'>184–86</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_184'>184</a>, <a href='#page_188'>188–91</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli compared with, <a href='#page_47'>47</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone compared with, <a href='#page_429'>429</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Jessel compared with, <a href='#page_180'>180</a>, <a href='#page_193'>193</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>judicial gifts of, <a href='#page_192'>192–93</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>legal manner of, <a href='#page_191'>191–92</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Mellish and, <a href='#page_176'>176–78</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>parliamentary reform opposed by, <a href='#page_307'>307</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political partisanship of, <a href='#page_187'>187</a>, <a href='#page_194'>194–195</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>religious views and interests of, <a href='#page_185'>185–86</a>, <a href='#page_193'>193–94</a><br /> +<br /> +Cambridge—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Jewish scholar at, <a href='#Footnote_0041'>319 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Sidgwick at, <a href='#page_327'>327</a> <i>seq.</i><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Smith, W. R., at, <a href='#page_319'>319</a><br /> +<br /> +Canterbury,<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>importance of See of, <a href='#page_101'>101–105</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>qualifications of archbishops of, <a href='#page_105'>105–107</a><br /> +<br /> +Carlyle, Thomas, <a href='#page_40'>40</a>, <a href='#page_87'>87</a>, <a href='#page_92'>92</a>, <a href='#page_126'>126</a>, <a href='#page_277'>277</a>, <a href='#page_461'>461</a><br /> +<br /> +Celtic temperament, <a href='#page_403'>403</a>, <a href='#page_405'>405</a><br /> +<br /> +Chancery Bar, <a href='#page_170'>170</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>famous trio at, <a href='#page_191'>191</a><br /> +<br /> +Chancery Courts, <a href='#page_181'>181–82</a><br /> +<br /> +Charity Organisation Society, <a href='#page_133'>133</a><br /> +<br /> +Church, Dean, <a href='#page_251'>251–52</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_Church' id='Index_Church'></a>Church—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Anglican—<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>disestablishment of, <a href='#page_114'>114–15</a>, <a href='#page_141'>141</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>possibilities before, <a href='#page_209'>209–10</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Stanley’s view of, <a href='#page_78'>78–79</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Tractarian movement in, <a href='#page_252'>252</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0031'>264 note</a>, <a href='#page_406'>406</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Roman Catholic—<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>adaptability of, <a href='#page_259'>259</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Infallibilist claims of, <a href='#page_256'>256</a>, <a href='#page_385'>385</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>modern research, attitude towards, <a href='#page_317'>317</a><br /> +<br /> +Clark, George T., quoted, <a href='#page_266'>266–67</a><br /> +<br /> +Clough, Miss A. J., <a href='#page_329'>329</a><br /> +<br /> +Clough, Arthur Hugh, <a href='#page_338'>338</a><br /> +<br /> +Cobden, Mr., quoted, <a href='#page_429'>429–30</a><br /> +<br /> +Collins, Wilkie, <a href='#page_116'>116</a><br /> +<br /> +Copleston, Dr. (Bishop of Llandaff), <a href='#page_197'>197</a><br /> +<br /> +Creighton, Bishop, <a href='#page_289'>289</a>, <a href='#page_387'>387</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Dalgairns, <a href='#page_251'>251</a><br /> +<br /> +Dante, <a href='#page_468'>468–69</a>, <a href='#page_471'>471</a><br /> +<br /> +Darwin, Charles, <a href='#page_457'>457</a>, <a href='#page_471'>471–72</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>De la Démocratie</i>, Schérer’s, cited, <a href='#Footnote_0039'>309 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Delane, Mr., <a href='#page_422'>422</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Democracy and the Organisation of Political Parties</i>,<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Ostrogorski’s, cited, <a href='#Footnote_0039'>309 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Denison, Archdeacon, <a href='#page_133'>133</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0032'>271 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Derby, Lord, <a href='#page_10'>10</a>, <a href='#page_12'>12</a>, <a href='#page_28'>28</a>, <a href='#page_47'>47</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57</a>, <a href='#page_198'>198</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a>, <a href='#page_470'>470</a><br /> +<br /> +Dickens, Charles, <a href='#page_123'>123</a>, <a href='#page_127'>127</a><br /> +<br /> +Disraeli. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Beaconsfield'>Beaconsfield</a><br /> +<br /> +Dissenters. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Nonconformists'>Nonconformists</a><br /> +<br /> +Döllinger, Dr. von, <a href='#page_383'>383</a>, <a href='#page_385'>385</a>, <a href='#page_392'>392</a><br /> +<br /> +Dupanloup, Archbishop, <a href='#page_209'>209</a>, <a href='#page_385'>385</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Eastern Question (1876), <a href='#page_140'>140</a>, <a href='#page_275'>275–276</a>, <a href='#page_300'>300</a>, <a href='#page_356'>356</a>, <a href='#page_419'>419</a><br /> +<br /> +Editors,<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>types of, <a href='#page_363'>363–64</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>temptations of, <a href='#page_370'>370</a>, <a href='#page_380'>380–81</a><br /> +<br /> +Eliot, George, <a href='#page_124'>124</a>, <a href='#page_328'>328</a><br /> +<br /> +Equity Courts, <a href='#page_170'>170</a>, <a href='#page_173'>173</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Essays and Reviews</i>, <a href='#page_113'>113</a>, <a href='#page_317'>317</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Essays on Reform</i>, cited, <a href='#page_307'>307</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0036'>note</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Evening Post, The</i>, <a href='#page_365'>365</a>, <a href='#page_374'>374–76</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Forster, W. E., <a href='#page_234'>234</a>, <a href='#page_239'>239</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0030'>note</a><br /> +<br /> +Fox, Charles James, <a href='#page_428'>428–29</a>, <a href='#page_435'>435</a><br /> +<br /> +France, novelists of, <a href='#page_129'>129</a><br /> +<br /> +Franchise extension. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Suffrage'>Suffrage</a><br /> +<br /> +Fraser, James, Bishop of Manchester—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biographies of, <a href='#Footnote_0025'>196 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_196'>196</a>, <a href='#page_200'>200–201</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_204'>204–205</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>energy of, <a href='#page_202'>202</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_483' name='page_483'></a>483</span><br /> +Fraser, James, Bishop of Manchester—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_206'>206</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>new Episcopal type created by, <a href='#page_196'>196</a>, <a href='#page_210'>210</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>personality of, <a href='#page_203'>203–204</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>popularity of, <a href='#page_202'>202</a>, <a href='#page_206'>206</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>ritualist illegalities, attitude towards, <a href='#page_208'>208</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>science, attitude towards, <a href='#page_207'>207</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_206'>206–207</a><br /> +<br /> +Freeman, Edward Augustus—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_37'>262 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_262'>262–63</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>friendships of, <a href='#page_290'>290</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green influenced by, <a href='#page_137'>137</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>historical work,<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>merits of, <a href='#page_276'>276–84</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>style of, <a href='#page_286'>286–87</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>humour of, <a href='#page_287'>287</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>interests of, <a href='#page_264'>264–67</a>, <a href='#page_271'>271–72</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>kindliness of, <a href='#page_278'>278</a>, <a href='#page_291'>291</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary preferences of, <a href='#page_269'>269–70</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>methodical ways of, <a href='#page_285'>285</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>military history, fondness for, <a href='#page_357'>357</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Oxford work of, <a href='#page_287'>287–89</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political views of, <a href='#page_272'>272–75</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>simplicity and directness of, <a href='#page_270'>270–71</a>, <a href='#page_275'>275</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Trollope and, <a href='#page_120'>120</a>, <a href='#page_271'>271</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0032'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>works of, <a href='#page_267'>267</a>, <a href='#page_284'>284–86</a>, <a href='#page_291'>291–92</a><br /> +<br /> +Froude, J. A., <a href='#Footnote_0032'>271 note</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Gardiner, S. R., <a href='#page_357'>357</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>quoted, <a href='#page_274'>274</a><br /> +<br /> +Gibbon, <a href='#page_133'>133</a>, <a href='#page_169'>169</a>, <a href='#page_281'>281</a>, <a href='#page_284'>284</a><br /> +<br /> +Gladstone, William Ewart—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Acton, Lord, relations with, <a href='#page_383'>383</a>, <a href='#page_399'>399</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span><i>Alabama</i> claims, action regarding, <a href='#page_444'>444</a>, <a href='#page_446'>446</a>, <a href='#page_449'>449</a>, <a href='#page_451'>451</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>American Civil War, attitude towards, <a href='#page_57'>57</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_412'>412</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of—<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>breadth and keenness of interests, <a href='#page_400'>400</a>, <a href='#page_413'>413</a>, <a href='#page_459'>459</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>caution, <a href='#page_409'>409</a>, <a href='#page_414'>414</a>, <a href='#page_419'>419</a>, <a href='#page_447'>447</a>, <a href='#page_453'>453</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>complexity of nature, <a href='#page_400'>400</a>, <a href='#page_409'>409–410</a>, <a href='#page_412'>412</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>conservatism, <a href='#page_401'>401</a>, <a href='#page_439'>439</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>constructive power, <a href='#page_439'>439–41</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>conversational powers, <a href='#page_461'>461</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>courage, <a href='#page_447'>447</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0059'>note</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0061'>451 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>courtesy, <a href='#page_423'>423</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0055'>note</a>, <a href='#page_455'>455–456</a>, <a href='#page_461'>461</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>dignity, <a href='#page_457'>457</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>emotional excitability, <a href='#page_405'>405</a>, <a href='#page_410'>410–411</a>, <a href='#page_433'>433–34</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>humour, <a href='#page_460'>460</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>impulsiveness, <a href='#page_401'>401</a>, <a href='#page_405'>405</a>, <a href='#page_421'>421</a>, <a href='#page_447'>447</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>independence, <a href='#page_418'>418–19</a>, <a href='#page_450'>450</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>ingenuity, <a href='#page_404'>404</a>, <a href='#page_416'>416–17</a>, <a href='#page_430'>430–31</a>, <a href='#page_466'>466</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>insight into character, <a href='#page_453'>453</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>intensity, <a href='#page_402'>402</a>, <a href='#page_405'>405</a>, <a href='#page_426'>426</a>, <a href='#page_435'>435</a>, <a href='#page_450'>450</a>, <a href='#page_453'>453</a>, <a href='#page_460'>460</a>, <a href='#page_462'>462</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>loyalty, <a href='#page_455'>455</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>magnanimity, <a href='#page_457'>457</a>, <a href='#page_477'>477</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>memory, <a href='#page_404'>404</a>, <a href='#page_424'>424</a>, <a href='#page_459'>459</a><br /> +<span class='indent6'> </span>for faces, <a href='#page_423'>423</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>open-mindedness, <a href='#page_416'>416</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a>, <a href='#page_454'>454</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>oratory, <a href='#page_411'>411</a>, <a href='#page_426'>426–39</a>, <a href='#page_463'>463</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>over-subtlety, <a href='#page_407'>407</a>, <a href='#page_432'>432</a>, <a href='#page_448'>448</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>patriotism, <a href='#page_450'>450–51</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>pride, <a href='#page_416'>416</a>, <a href='#page_420'>420</a>, <a href='#page_423'>423</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a>, <a href='#page_455'>455</a>, <a href='#page_474'>474</a>, <a href='#page_477'>477</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>religious disposition, <a href='#page_472'>472–75</a><br /> +<span class='indent6'> </span>views, <a href='#page_401'>401</a>, <a href='#page_406'>406–407</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>reserve:<br /> +<span class='indent6'> </span>political, <a href='#page_409'>409</a>, <a href='#page_414'>414–15</a>, <a href='#page_419'>419</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a><br /> +<span class='indent6'> </span>personal, <a href='#page_424'>424</a>, <a href='#page_475'>475–476</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Scottish temperament, <a href='#page_403'>403–405</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>self-confidence, <a href='#page_224'>224</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>simplicity, <a href='#page_453'>453</a>, <a href='#page_458'>458</a>, <a href='#page_461'>461</a>, <a href='#page_475'>475</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>sincerity, <a href='#page_401'>401</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>temper, <a href='#page_455'>455–56</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>tranquillity, <a href='#page_462'>462</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>voice, <a href='#page_430'>430</a>, <a href='#page_436'>436–38</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli and, <a href='#page_11'>11</a>, <a href='#page_33'>33</a>, <a href='#page_35'>35</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>estimates of, <a href='#page_411'>411</a>, <a href='#page_417'>417</a>, <a href='#page_448'>448</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>continental, <a href='#page_444'>444</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>family of, <a href='#page_403'>403</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>foreign affairs, attitude towards, <a href='#page_443'>443–46</a>, <a href='#page_458'>458</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Freeman’s appointment by, <a href='#page_263'>263</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>High Church appointments of, <a href='#page_198'>198</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>home life of, <a href='#page_462'>462</a>, <a href='#page_474'>474</a>, <a href='#page_477'>477</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Home Rule Bill of (1886), <a href='#page_272'>272</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Homeric studies and views of, <a href='#page_401'>401</a>, <a href='#page_465'>465–68</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>hostility to, <a href='#page_304'>304</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary activities of, <a href='#page_401'>401</a>, <a href='#page_458'>458</a>, <a href='#page_462'>462–68</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Lowe compared with, <a href='#page_293'>293</a>, <a href='#page_299'>299</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a>, <a href='#page_435'>435</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Lowe’s antagonism to, <a href='#page_295'>295</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Lowe in Cabinet of, <a href='#page_299'>299</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>mistakes of, <a href='#page_449'>449</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Northcote and, <a href='#page_212'>212</a>, <a href='#page_216'>216</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Oxford training of, <a href='#page_406'>406–408</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_484' name='page_484'></a>484</span><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>parliamentary abilities of, <a href='#page_420'>420–21</a>, <a href='#page_424'>424–26</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Parnell’s resentment against, <a href='#page_239'>239–240</a>, <a href='#page_247'>247</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Peel’s influence on, <a href='#page_10'>10</a>, <a href='#page_409'>409</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>poetry, attitude towards, <a href='#page_471'>471</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>quoted, <a href='#page_56'>56</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Reform Bill of, <a href='#page_13'>13</a>, <a href='#page_442'>442</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>scholarship of, <a href='#page_468'>468</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>science, attitude towards, <a href='#page_407'>407–408</a>, <a href='#page_470'>470</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>suffrage qualifications, proposed reduction of, <a href='#Footnote_0037'>308 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>theological views of, tinging political, <a href='#page_473'>473</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>otherwise mentioned, <a href='#page_67'>67</a>, <a href='#page_113'>113</a>, <a href='#page_179'>179</a>, <a href='#page_187'>187</a>, <a href='#page_221'>221</a>, <a href='#page_260'>260</a><br /> +<br /> +Godkin, Edwin Lawrence—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_365'>365–66</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>courage of, <a href='#page_370'>370–71</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>geniality of, <a href='#page_376'>376</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>humour of, <a href='#page_368'>368–73</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>independence of, <a href='#page_364'>364</a>, <a href='#page_369'>369</a>, <a href='#page_381'>381</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_378'>378–80</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>sincerity of, <a href='#page_367'>367</a>, <a href='#page_373'>373</a>, <a href='#page_380'>380</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>style of, <a href='#page_367'>367–68</a>, <a href='#page_373'>373</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Tammany, attitude towards, <a href='#page_374'>374</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0049'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_366'>366–67</a>, <a href='#page_370'>370</a>, <a href='#page_374'>374–76</a><br /> +<br /> +Green, John Richard—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_22'>131 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_131'>131–34</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>conversation of, <a href='#page_165'>165–66</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>eloquence of, <a href='#page_166'>166</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>gifts and qualities of, <a href='#page_146'>146</a>, <a href='#page_151'>151–52</a>, <a href='#page_154'>154</a>, <a href='#page_160'>160–62</a>, <a href='#page_164'>164–67</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>ill-health of, <a href='#page_138'>138</a>, <a href='#page_141'>141–46</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>interests of, <a href='#page_151'>151</a>, <a href='#page_154'>154–57</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>letters of, <a href='#Footnote_22'>131 note</a>, <a href='#page_152'>152–53</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary work of—<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span><i>Saturday Review</i> articles, <a href='#page_133'>133</a>, <a href='#page_135'>135–37</a>, <a href='#page_153'>153</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>historical, <a href='#page_138'>138–39</a>, <a href='#page_142'>142–45</a>, <a href='#page_155'>155</a>, <a href='#page_158'>158–60</a>, <a href='#page_163'>163–64</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_139'>139–40</a>, <a href='#page_150'>150</a>, <a href='#page_152'>152–53</a>, <a href='#page_157'>157–65</a>, <a href='#page_167'>167–69</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>military history, fondness for, <a href='#page_357'>357</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political activity of, <a href='#page_140'>140–41</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_134'>134</a><br /> +<br /> +Green, Prof. Thomas Hill—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_85'>85</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_86'>86–91</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>civic activities of, <a href='#page_98'>98</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_95'>95–97</a>, <a href='#page_99'>99</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary works of, <a href='#page_92'>92–94</a>, <a href='#page_98'>98</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political keenness of, <a href='#page_95'>95</a>, <a href='#page_97'>97</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_93'>93</a>, <a href='#page_97'>97</a>, <a href='#page_335'>335</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>otherwise mentioned, <a href='#page_265'>265</a>, <a href='#page_268'>268</a>, <a href='#page_278'>278</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Hardy, Gathorne, <a href='#page_213'>213</a><br /> +<br /> +Hardy, Thomas, <a href='#page_116'>116</a><br /> +<br /> +Healy, T. M., <a href='#page_443'>443</a><br /> +<br /> +Henry VIII., <a href='#Footnote_0032'>271 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Herodotus, <a href='#page_149'>149–51</a><br /> +<br /> +Historians—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>qualifications of, <a href='#page_146'>146–48</a>, <a href='#page_156'>156</a>, <a href='#page_277'>277</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>two classes of, <a href='#page_149'>149</a><br /> +<br /> +History, Freeman’s view of, <a href='#page_268'>268</a>, <a href='#page_274'>274</a><br /> +<br /> +Hodgkin, Dr. Thomas, <a href='#page_357'>357</a><br /> +<br /> +Holker, Sir John, <a href='#Footnote_0062'>453 note</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_House_of_Commons' id='Index_House_of_Commons'></a>House of Commons—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>character of, <a href='#page_48'>48</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>erroneous sketches of, <a href='#page_121'>121</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>lawyers in, <a href='#page_172'>172</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>leadership of, <a href='#page_217'>217</a>, <a href='#page_424'>424</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>occasional detachment of, from popular sentiment, <a href='#page_51'>51</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>power of, declining, <a href='#page_308'>308–309</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>rhetoric unpopular with, <a href='#page_296'>296</a><br /> +<br /> +Huxley, <a href='#page_207'>207</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Iddesleigh. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Northcote'>Northcote</a><br /> +<br /> +Ireland—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Anglo-Irish Protestants, <a href='#page_229'>229–30</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Church disestablishment in, <a href='#page_113'>113</a>, <a href='#page_187'>187</a>, <a href='#page_273'>273</a>, <a href='#page_407'>407</a>, <a href='#page_419'>419</a>, <a href='#page_442'>442</a>, <a href='#page_449'>449</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0060'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli’s attitude towards, <a href='#page_56'>56–57</a>, <a href='#page_67'>67</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green, J. R., views of, regarding, <a href='#page_141'>141</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Home Rule, views regarding, of<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Acton, <a href='#page_384'>384</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Bowen, <a href='#page_356'>356</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Bright, <a href='#Footnote_0063'>455 note</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Freeman, <a href='#page_272'>272</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Gladstone, <a href='#page_272'>272</a>, <a href='#page_414'>414</a>, <a href='#page_447'>447</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>Godkin, <a href='#page_375'>375</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Land Bill of 1881, <a href='#page_425'>425</a>, <a href='#page_442'>442–43</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">James, Henry, <a href='#page_129'>129</a><br /> +<br /> +Jessel, Sir George—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Cairns compared with, <a href='#page_180'>180</a>, <a href='#page_193'>193</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_171'>171</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>judicial methods of, <a href='#page_174'>174–75</a>, <a href='#page_179'>179–181</a>, <a href='#page_194'>194</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>mental powers of, <a href='#page_173'>173</a>, <a href='#page_181'>181–82</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>parliamentary manner of, <a href='#page_172'>172</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>quickness of, <a href='#page_173'>173</a>, <a href='#page_176'>176</a>, <a href='#page_183'>183</a>, <a href='#page_193'>193</a><br /> +<br /> +Jews—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>bigotry towards, <a href='#page_183'>183</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Cambridge scholar, anecdote of, <a href='#Footnote_0041'>319 note</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_485' name='page_485'></a>485</span><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>concentration, power of, possessed by, <a href='#page_23'>23</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0004'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>conservatism of, <a href='#Footnote_0005'>25 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>detachment of, <a href='#page_19'>19–20</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>distinctions gained by, <a href='#page_171'>171</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>practicality of, <a href='#page_182'>182</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>satirical powers of, <a href='#page_45'>45</a><br /> +<br /> +Jowett, <a href='#page_113'>113</a>, <a href='#page_150'>150</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Kelvin, Lord, <a href='#page_184'>184</a><br /> +<br /> +Kipling, Rudyard, <a href='#page_129'>129</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Lawrence, Lord, <a href='#page_184'>184</a><br /> +<br /> +Lightfoot, Bishop, <a href='#page_199'>199–200</a>, <a href='#page_209'>209</a>, <a href='#page_290'>290</a><br /> +<br /> +Louis Napoleon, <a href='#page_55'>55</a>, <a href='#page_64'>64</a>, <a href='#page_98'>98</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_Lowe_Robert' id='Index_Lowe_Robert'></a>Lowe, Robert—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_41'>293 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Cairns compared with, <a href='#page_188'>188</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_293'>293–95</a>, <a href='#page_299'>299–300</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_301'>301–304</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli and, <a href='#page_34'>34</a>, <a href='#page_302'>302</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>eclipse of fame of, <a href='#page_293'>293</a>, <a href='#page_300'>300</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>educational work of, <a href='#page_294'>294–95</a>, <a href='#page_304'>304–305</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone compared with, <a href='#page_293'>293</a>, <a href='#page_299'>299</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a>, <a href='#page_435'>435</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>antagonism to Gladstone, <a href='#page_295'>295</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>in Gladstone’s Cabinet, <a href='#page_299'>299</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Oxford, at, <a href='#Footnote_0035'>301 note <span class='super'>2</span></a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>rhetorical power of, <a href='#page_296'>296–97</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>shortsightedness of, <a href='#page_300'>300–301</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Utilitarianism of, <a href='#page_304'>304</a><br /> +<br /> +Lyndhurst, Lord, <a href='#page_29'>29</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Macaulay, <a href='#page_139'>139</a>, <a href='#page_169'>169</a>, <a href='#page_270'>270</a>, <a href='#page_274'>274</a>, <a href='#page_281'>281</a>, <a href='#page_427'>427</a>, <a href='#page_428'>428</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0057'>note <span class='super'>2</span></a><br /> +<br /> +Macdonald, Sir John A., <a href='#page_422'>422</a><br /> +<br /> +Maclennan, John F., <a href='#page_320'>320</a><br /> +<br /> +Magee, Archbishop, <a href='#page_112'>112</a>, <a href='#page_199'>199</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a><br /> +<br /> +Manning, Cardinal Henry Edward—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#page_260'>260–61</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_250'>250–51</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_251'>251–54</a>, <a href='#page_261'>261</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>conversions effected by, <a href='#page_255'>255</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Infallibilist cause, work for, <a href='#page_256'>256</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>interests and sympathies of, <a href='#page_257'>257–61</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>speeches of, <a href='#page_255'>255</a><br /> +<br /> +Maurice, F. D., <a href='#page_134'>134</a>, <a href='#page_408'>408</a><br /> +<br /> +Mellish, Lord Justice, <a href='#page_176'>176–79</a><br /> +<br /> +Meredith, George, <a href='#page_116'>116</a>, <a href='#page_122'>122</a><br /> +<br /> +Mill, John Stuart, <a href='#page_61'>61</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0015'>78 note</a>, <a href='#page_93'>93</a>, <a href='#page_304'>304</a><br /> +<br /> +Monk, Bishop, <a href='#page_197'>197</a><br /> +<br /> +Mugwumps, <a href='#page_375'>375</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0050'>note</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Napoleon Bonaparte, <a href='#page_238'>238</a><br /> +<br /> +Napoleon, Louis, <a href='#page_55'>55</a>, <a href='#page_64'>64</a>, <a href='#page_98'>98</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Nation, The</i>, <a href='#page_365'>365</a>, <a href='#page_368'>368</a>, <a href='#page_371'>371–73</a>, <a href='#page_378'>378</a><br /> +<br /> +Newman, Cardinal, <a href='#page_251'>251–52</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0056'>428 note <span class='super'>1</span></a>, <a href='#page_467'>467</a><br /> +<br /> +Newnham College, Cambridge, <a href='#page_329'>329–330</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_Nonconformists' id='Index_Nonconformists'></a>Nonconformists—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli’s dislike of, <a href='#page_8'>8</a>, <a href='#page_52'>52</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Education Act (1870) resented by, <a href='#page_15'>15</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Fraser’s attitude towards, <a href='#page_202'>202</a>, <a href='#page_206'>206–208</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0028'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone trusted by, <a href='#page_401'>401</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green’s dislike of, <a href='#page_134'>134</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_Northcote' id='Index_Northcote'></a>Northcote, Sir Stafford (Lord Iddesleigh)—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_34'>211 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_212'>212–13</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_213'>213</a>, <a href='#page_222'>222–23</a>, <a href='#page_225'>225–26</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone compared with, <a href='#page_435'>435</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>parliamentary abilities of, <a href='#page_214'>214–16</a>, <a href='#page_218'>218</a><br /> +<br /> +Novels, types of, <a href='#page_122'>122</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">O’Connell, Daniel, <a href='#page_6'>6</a>, <a href='#page_8'>8</a>, <a href='#page_248'>248</a><br /> +<br /> +Oliphant, Mrs., <a href='#page_116'>116</a><br /> +<br /> +Oratory—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>elevation in, <a href='#page_433'>433</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>reputation for, nature of, <a href='#page_427'>427</a><br /> +<br /> +Oxford—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green, T. H., on municipal council of, <a href='#page_98'>98–99</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Thackeray’s candidature for, <a href='#page_120'>120</a><br /> +<br /> +Oxford University—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Tractarian movement in, <a href='#page_252'>252</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0031'>264 note</a>, <a href='#page_406'>406</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>training at, characteristics of, <a href='#page_408'>408</a>, <a href='#page_467'>467</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em"><a name='Index_Palmer_Roundell' id='Index_Palmer_Roundell'></a>Palmer, Roundell (Lord Selborne), <a href='#page_176'>176</a>, <a href='#page_191'>191–92</a>, <a href='#page_294'>294</a><br /> +<br /> +Palmerston, Lord, <a href='#page_13'>13</a>, <a href='#page_28'>28</a>, <a href='#page_49'>49</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57</a>, <a href='#page_98'>98</a>, <a href='#page_294'>294</a><br /> +<br /> +Parliament. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_House_of_Commons'>House of Commons</a><br /> +<br /> +Parnell, Charles Stewart—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, <a href='#Footnote_0029'>227 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_228'>228–29</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>family of, <a href='#page_227'>227</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>leadership, aptness for, <a href='#page_248'>248</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>moral courage of, <a href='#page_239'>239</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>parliamentary tactics of, <a href='#page_218'>218–19</a>, <a href='#page_244'>244</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>knowledge of procedure, <a href='#page_242'>242–43</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>passion and self-control of, <a href='#page_240'>240</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Phœnix Park murders, demeanour after, <a href='#page_236'>236</a>, <a href='#page_238'>238</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Pigott affair, attitude towards, <a href='#page_239'>239</a> +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_486' name='page_486'></a>486</span><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>practicality of, <a href='#page_230'>230–33</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>pride of, <a href='#page_233'>233</a>, <a href='#page_235'>235–38</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>self-confidence of, <a href='#page_224'>224</a>, <a href='#page_236'>236</a>, <a href='#page_238'>238</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>speeches of, <a href='#page_241'>241–42</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>unscrupulousness of, <a href='#page_237'>237–38</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>unsympathetic manner of, <a href='#page_190'>190</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_245'>245–46</a><br /> +<br /> +Peel, Sir Robert—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>caution of, <a href='#page_408'>408–409</a>, <a href='#page_452'>452</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>death of, <a href='#page_10'>10</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli’s conduct towards, <a href='#page_28'>28</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0006'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>his view of, <a href='#page_55'>55</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>financial policy of, <a href='#page_441'>441–42</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Gladstone compared with, <a href='#page_411'>411</a>, <a href='#page_439'>439</a>, <a href='#page_455'>455</a>, <a href='#page_475'>475</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>separation of, from Conservatives, <a href='#page_9'>9</a>, <a href='#page_61'>61</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>speeches of, <a href='#page_428'>428</a><br /> +<br /> +Pitt, William, <a href='#page_429'>429</a>, <a href='#page_435'>435</a>, <a href='#page_439'>439</a>, <a href='#page_442'>442</a>, <a href='#page_476'>476</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Popular Government</i>, Sir H. Maine’s, cited, <a href='#Footnote_0039'>309 note</a><br /> +<br /> +Psychical Research Society, <a href='#page_331'>331–32</a><br /> +<br /> +Pusey, Dr., cited, <a href='#page_80'>80</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Rhodes, Cecil, <a href='#page_246'>246</a><br /> +<br /> +Rolt, Lord Justice, <a href='#page_191'>191–92</a><br /> +<br /> +Roman Catholic Church. <i>See under</i> <a href='#Index_Church'>Church</a><br /> +<br /> +Russell, Lord, <a href='#page_13'>13</a>, <a href='#page_28'>28</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57</a>, <a href='#page_295'>295</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Salisbury, Lord, <a href='#page_186'>186</a>, <a href='#page_247'>247</a>, <a href='#page_295'>295</a>, <a href='#page_456'>456</a><br /> +<br /> +<i>Saturday Review</i>—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Bowen’s contributions to, <a href='#page_360'>360</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Freeman’s contributions to, <a href='#page_285'>285</a><br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>dissociation from, <a href='#page_275'>275</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green’s contributions to, <a href='#page_133'>133</a>, <a href='#page_135'>135–137</a>, <a href='#page_153'>153</a><br /> +<br /> +Schoolmasters, types of, <a href='#page_343'>343</a>, <a href='#page_346'>346</a><br /> +<br /> +Schools Inquiry Commission, <a href='#page_200'>200–201</a><br /> +<br /> +Scott, Sir Walter, <a href='#page_123'>123</a>, <a href='#page_125'>125</a><br /> +<br /> +Scottish temperament and characteristics, <a href='#page_315'>315</a>, <a href='#page_403'>403–405</a><br /> +<br /> +Selborne, Lord. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Palmer_Roundell'>Palmer, Roundell</a><br /> +<br /> +Sherbrooke, Viscount. <i>See</i> <a href='#Index_Lowe_Robert'>Lowe, Robert</a><br /> +<br /> +Sidgwick, Henry—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_327'>327–29</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_338'>338–42</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>impartiality of, <a href='#page_334'>334</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary preferences of, <a href='#page_338'>338</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>psychical research, interest in, <a href='#page_331'>331–332</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, philosophical and political, <a href='#page_335'>335–37</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>women’s education promoted by, <a href='#page_329'>329</a><br /> +<br /> +Sidgwick, Henry—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>works of, <a href='#page_332'>332–34</a>, <a href='#page_338'>338</a><br /> +<br /> +Skene, Mr., cited, <a href='#page_158'>158</a><br /> +<br /> +Smith, Professor Goldwin, <a href='#page_76'>76</a>, <a href='#page_281'>281</a><br /> +<br /> +Smith, R. Bosworth, quoted, <a href='#page_349'>349–50</a><br /> +<br /> +Smith, Prof. Robertson—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Acton, Lord, and, <a href='#page_387'>387</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_311'>311–12</a>, <a href='#page_315'>315</a>, <a href='#page_318'>318–320</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_323'>323–25</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>ecclesiastical trial of, <a href='#page_313'>313–16</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span><i>Encyclopædia Britannica</i>, work on, <a href='#page_312'>312–14</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>versatility of, <a href='#page_322'>322</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>works of, <a href='#page_320'>320–21</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_321'>321</a><br /> +<br /> +Stanley, Very Rev. Arthur Penrhyn—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_70'>70</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_71'>71</a>, <a href='#page_73'>73</a>, <a href='#page_77'>77</a>, <a href='#page_82'>82–84</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>debating power of, <a href='#page_77'>77</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli and, <a href='#page_81'>81</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>family of, <a href='#page_69'>69–70</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green influenced by, <a href='#page_132'>132</a>, <a href='#page_137'>137</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary work of, <a href='#page_71'>71–74</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>politics of, <a href='#page_78'>78</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>sermons of, <a href='#page_76'>76–77</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>theological position of, <a href='#page_80'>80–81</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Tait, attitude towards, <a href='#page_113'>113</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>otherwise mentioned, <a href='#page_164'>164–65</a>, <a href='#page_205'>205–206</a><br /> +<br /> +Statesmanship, necessary qualifications for, <a href='#page_46'>46</a><br /> +<br /> +Stevenson, R. L., <a href='#page_129'>129</a><br /> +<br /> +Stubbs, Bishop, <a href='#page_138'>138</a>, <a href='#page_160'>160</a>, <a href='#page_289'>289–90</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0062'>453 note</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name='Index_Suffrage' id='Index_Suffrage'></a>Suffrage extension—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Disraeli’s view of, <a href='#page_52'>52</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57–58</a>, <a href='#page_67'>67–68</a>, <a href='#page_310'>310</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Lowe’s opposition to, <a href='#page_295'>295–98</a>, <a href='#page_305'>305–306</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>results of, <a href='#page_306'>306–309</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Tait, Archibald Campbell, Archbishop of Canterbury—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biography of, cited, <a href='#Footnote_19'>100 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>career of, <a href='#page_107'>107</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_108'>108–12</a>, <a href='#page_209'>209</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Green appointed librarian by, <a href='#page_133'>133–134</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>influence of, <a href='#page_110'>110–12</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Irish Church Disestablishment Bill, attitude towards, <a href='#page_187'>187</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>policy of, <a href='#page_112'>112</a>, <a href='#page_114'>114</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>views of, <a href='#page_110'>110</a><br /> +<br /> +Temple, Archbishop, <a href='#page_113'>113</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0017'>note</a>, <a href='#page_199'>199</a><br /> +<br /> +Tennyson, <a href='#page_39'>39</a>, <a href='#page_459'>459</a><br /> +<br /> +Thackeray, W. M., <a href='#page_35'>35</a>, <a href='#page_120'>120</a>, <a href='#page_123'>123–25</a><br /> + +<span class='pagenum pncolor'><a id='page_487' name='page_487'></a>487</span><br /> +Thirlwall, Bishop, <a href='#page_112'>112</a><br /> +<br /> +Thucydides, <a href='#page_149'>149–50</a><br /> +<br /> +Tone, Wolfe, <a href='#page_229'>229</a>, <a href='#page_248'>248</a><br /> +<br /> +Tory party—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>nature of, <a href='#page_218'>218</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>(1848-1865), <a href='#page_60'>60–62</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>suffrage extension profitable to, <a href='#page_52'>52</a>, <a href='#page_57'>57–58</a>, <a href='#page_67'>67</a>, <a href='#page_310'>310</a><br /> +<br /> +Tractarian movement, <a href='#page_252'>252</a>, <a href='#Footnote_0031'>264 note</a>, <a href='#page_406'>406</a><br /> +<br /> +Trollope, Anthony—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>biographies of, cited, <a href='#Footnote_21'>116 note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Freeman and, <a href='#page_120'>120</a>, <a href='#page_271'>271</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0032'>note</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>literary position of, <a href='#page_116'>116–18</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>personality of, <a href='#page_118'>118</a>, <a href='#page_126'>126</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>political activity of, <a href='#page_120'>120</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>travels of, <a href='#page_121'>121–22</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>works of, <a href='#page_117'>117–20</a>, <a href='#page_128'>128</a>;<br /> +<span class='indent4'> </span>characteristics of, <a href='#page_122'>122–30</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em"><a name='Index_United_States' id='Index_United_States'></a>United States—<br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Acton’s knowledge of history of, <a href='#page_387'>387</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Freeman’s visit to, <a href='#page_268'>268</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>journalism in, <a href='#page_379'>379</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Presbyterianism in, <a href='#page_317'>317</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>religion and politics dissociated in, <a href='#page_100'>100</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>Trollope’s account of, <a href='#page_122'>122</a><br /> +<span class='indent2'> </span>University influence in, <a href='#page_378'>378</a></p> +<p class='padtop lalign' style="margin-left:0.5em">Westbury, Lord, <a href='#page_303'>303</a><br /> +<br /> +Whiggism, <a href='#page_6'>6</a>, <a href='#page_8'>8</a>, <a href='#page_63'>63</a>, <a href='#page_298'>298</a>, <a href='#page_469'>469</a><br /> +<br /> +Wilberforce, Bishop Samuel, <a href='#page_111'>111–12</a>, <a href='#page_198'>198</a>, <a href='#page_254'>254</a>, <a href='#page_429'>429</a><br /> +<br /> +Women, education of, <a href='#page_329'>329–31</a><br /> +<br /> +Wordsworth, <a href='#page_301'>301</a><br /> +<br /> +Wright, William, <a href='#page_319'>319</a> and <a href='#Footnote_0041'>note</a>, <a href='#page_320'>320</a></p> +</div> +<p class='center' style='margin:4em auto;'>THE END</p> +<p class='center' style='margin:auto 4em'><i>Printed by</i> <span class='smcap'>R. & R. Clark, Limited</span>, <i>Edinburgh</i>.</p> +<hr class='pb' /> +<div class="trnote"> +<p><b>Transcriber’s Note:</b></p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>The authors’ archaic and variable spelling and hyphenation are preserved.</p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>The authors’ punctuation styles are preserved.</p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>Footnotes have been collected and placed at the end of this HTML version.</p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>Any missing page numbers in this HTML version refer to blank or un-numbered pages in the original.</p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>Typographical errors were corrected, and these are +<ins class="trchange" title="Was 'hgihligthed'">highlighted</ins>.</p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'>Passages in Greek show transliterations with mouse-hover popups, e.g., <span class='greek' title='gnômai'>γνῶμαι</span></p> +<p><b>Transcriber’s Changes:</b></p> +<p style='margin-left:1.0em'><a href='#TC_1'>Page 218</a>: Was ’opportunies’ (in granting or refusing <b>opportunities</b> for discussing topics he would prefer to have not discussed at all.)</p> +</div> + +<p> </p> +<p> </p> +<hr class="full" /> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY BIOGRAPHY***</p> +<p>******* This file should be named 31677-h.txt or 31677-h.zip *******</p> +<p>This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br /> +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/1/6/7/31677">http://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/6/7/31677</a></p> +<p>Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed.</p> + +<p>Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution.</p> + + + +<pre> +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license">http://www.gutenberg.org/license)</a>. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org">http://www.gutenberg.org</a> + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/">http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/</a> + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL">http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL</a> + +*** END: FULL LICENSE *** +</pre> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/31677-h/images/i002.png b/31677-h/images/i002.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7c0892f --- /dev/null +++ b/31677-h/images/i002.png |
