diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:35 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:35 -0700 |
| commit | 3af1987425ec530973b37feb467ff043c59dafe6 (patch) | |
| tree | a61d0996da787879c064d02e367c5957671db932 /3144-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '3144-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 3144-h/3144-h.htm | 2171 |
1 files changed, 2171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3144-h/3144-h.htm b/3144-h/3144-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b97261 --- /dev/null +++ b/3144-h/3144-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2171 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" /> +<title>Froude's History of England, by Charles Kingsley</title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + P { margin-top: .75em; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + P.gutsumm { margin-left: 5%;} + P.poetry {margin-left: 3%; } + .GutSmall { font-size: 0.7em; } + H1, H2 { + text-align: center; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + } + H3, H4, H5 { + text-align: center; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + BODY{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + table { border-collapse: collapse; } +table {margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;} + td { vertical-align: top; border: 1px solid black;} + td p { margin: 0.2em; } + .blkquot {margin-left: 4em; margin-right: 4em;} /* block indent */ + + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .pagenum {position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: small; + text-align: right; + font-weight: normal; + color: gray; + } + img { border: none; } + img.dc { float: left; width: 50px; height: 50px; } + p.gutindent { margin-left: 2em; } + div.gapspace { height: 0.8em; } + div.gapline { height: 0.8em; width: 100%; border-top: 1px solid;} + div.gapmediumline { height: 0.3em; width: 40%; margin-left:30%; + border-top: 1px solid; } + div.gapmediumdoubleline { height: 0.3em; width: 40%; margin-left:30%; + border-top: 1px solid; border-bottom: 1px solid;} + div.gapshortdoubleline { height: 0.3em; width: 20%; + margin-left: 40%; border-top: 1px solid; + border-bottom: 1px solid; } + div.gapdoubleline { height: 0.3em; width: 50%; + margin-left: 25%; border-top: 1px solid; + border-bottom: 1px solid;} + div.gapshortline { height: 0.3em; width: 20%; margin-left:40%; + border-top: 1px solid; } + .citation {vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none;} + img.floatleft { float: left; + margin-right: 1em; + margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; } + img.floatright { float: right; + margin-left: 1em; margin-top: 0.5em; + margin-bottom: 0.5em; } + img.clearcenter {display: block; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; margin-top: 0.5em; + margin-bottom: 0.5em} + --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> +</head> +<body> +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg eBook, Froude's History of England, by Charles +Kingsley + + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most +other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of +the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at +www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have +to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. + + + + +Title: Froude's History of England + + +Author: Charles Kingsley + + + +Release Date: December 26, 2014 [eBook #3144] +[This file was first posted on January 2, 2001] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII) + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FROUDE'S HISTORY OF ENGLAND*** +</pre> +<p>Transcribed from “Plays and Puritans and Other +Historical Essays” 1890 Macmillan and Co. edition by David +Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org</p> +<h1>FROUDE’S HISTORY OF ENGLAND <a +name="citation219"></a><a href="#footnote219" +class="citation">[219]</a></h1> +<p><span class="smcap">There</span> appeared a few years since a +‘Comic History of England,’ duly caricaturing and +falsifying all our great national events, and representing the +English people, for many centuries back, as a mob of fools and +knaves, led by the nose in each generation by a few arch-fools +and arch-knaves. Some thoughtful persons regarded the book +with utter contempt and indignation; it seemed to them a crime to +have written it; a proof of ‘banausia,’ as Aristotle +would have called it, only to be outdone by the writing a +‘Comic Bible.’ After a while, however, their +indignation began to subside; their second thoughts, as usual, +were more charitable than their first; they were not surprised to +hear that the author was an honest, just, and able magistrate; +they saw that the publication of such a book involved no moral +turpitude; that it was merely meant as a jest on a subject on +which jesting was permissible, and as a money speculation in a +field of which men had a right to make money; while all which +seemed offensive in it was merely the outcome, and as it were +apotheosis, of that method of writing English history which has +been popular for nearly a hundred years. ‘Which of +our modern historians,’ they asked themselves, ‘has +had any real feeling of the importance, the sacredness, of his +subject?—any real trust in, or respect for, the characters +with whom he dealt? Has not the belief of each and all of +them been the same—that on the whole, the many always have +been fools and knaves; foolish and knavish enough, at least, to +become the puppets of a few fools and knaves who held the reins +of power? Have they not held that, on the whole, the +problems of human nature and human history have been sufficiently +solved by Gibbon and Voltaire, Gil Blas and Figaro; that our +forefathers were silly barbarians; that this glorious nineteenth +century is the one region of light, and that all before was outer +darkness, peopled by ‘foreign devils,’ Englishmen, no +doubt, according to the flesh, but in spirit, in knowledge, in +creed, in customs, so utterly different from ourselves that we +shall merely show our sentimentalism by doing aught but laughing +at them?</p> +<p>On what other principle have our English histories as yet been +constructed, even down to the children’s books, which +taught us in childhood that the history of this country was +nothing but a string of foolish wars, carried on by wicked kings, +for reasons hitherto unexplained, save on that great historic law +of Goldsmith’s by which Sir Archibald Alison would still +explain the French Revolution—</p> +<blockquote><p>‘The dog, to serve his private ends,<br /> +Went mad, and bit the man?’</p> +</blockquote> +<p>It will be answered by some, and perhaps rather angrily, that +these strictures are too sweeping; that there is arising, in a +certain quarter, a school of history books for young people of a +far more reverent tone, which tries to do full honour to the +Church and her work in the world. Those books of this +school which we have seen, we must reply, seem just as much +wanting in real reverence for the past as the school of Gibbon +and Voltaire. It is not the past which they reverence, but +a few characters or facts eclectically picked out of the past, +and, for the most part, made to look beautiful by ignoring all +the features which will not suit their preconceived +pseudo-ideal. There is in these books a scarcely concealed +dissatisfaction with the whole course of the British mind since +the Reformation, and (though they are not inclined to confess the +fact) with its whole course before the Reformation, because that +course was one of steady struggle against the Papacy and its +anti-national pretensions. They are the outcome of an +utterly un-English tone of thought; and the so-called ‘ages +of faith’ are pleasant and useful to them, principally +because they are distant and unknown enough to enable them to +conceal from their readers that in the ages on which they look +back as ideally perfect a Bernard and a Francis of Assisi were +crying all day long—‘O that my head were a fountain +of tears, that I might weep for the sins of my +people!’ Dante was cursing popes and prelates in the +name of the God of Righteousness; Boccaccio and Chaucer were +lifting the veil from priestly abominations of which we now are +ashamed even to read; and Wolsey, seeing the rottenness of the +whole system, spent his mighty talents, and at last poured out +his soul unto death, in one long useless effort to make the +crooked straight, and number that which had been weighed in the +balances of God, and found for ever wanting. To ignore +wilfully facts like these, which were patent all along to the +British nation, facts on which the British laity acted, till they +finally conquered at the Reformation, and on which they are +acting still, and will, probably, act for ever, is not to have +any real reverence for the opinions or virtues of our +forefathers; and we are not astonished to find repeated, in such +books, the old stock calumnies against our lay and Protestant +worthies, taken at second-hand from the pages of Lingard. +In copying from Lingard, however, this party has done no more +than those writers have who would repudiate any +party—almost any Christian—purpose. Lingard is +known to have been a learned man, and to have examined many +manuscripts which few else had taken the trouble to look at; so +his word is to be taken, no one thinking it worth while to ask +whether he has either honestly read or honestly quoted the +documents. It suited the sentimental and lazy liberality of +the last generation to make a show of fairness by letting the +Popish historian tell his side of the story, and to sneer at the +illiberal old notion that gentlemen of his class were given to be +rather careless about historic truth when they had a purpose to +serve thereby; and Lingard is now actually recommended as a +standard authority for the young by educated Protestants, who +seem utterly unable to see that, whether the man be honest or +not, his whole view of the course of British events since Becket +first quarrelled with his king must be antipodal to their own; +and that his account of all which has passed for three hundred +years since the fall of Wolsey is most likely to be (and, indeed, +may be proved to be) one huge libel on the whole nation, and the +destiny which God has marked out for it.</p> +<p>There is, indeed, no intrinsic cause why the ecclesiastical, +or pseudo-Catholic, view of history should, in any wise, conduce +to a just appreciation of our forefathers. For not only did +our forefathers rebel against that conception again and again, +till they finally trampled it under their feet, and so appear, +<i>primâ facie</i>, as offenders to be judged at its bar; +but the conception itself is one which takes the very same view +of nature as that cynic conception of which we spoke above. +Man, with the Romish divines, is, <i>ipso facto</i>, the same +being as the man of Voltaire, Le Sage, or Beaumarchais; he is an +insane and degraded being, who is to be kept in order, and, as +far as may be, cured and set to work by an ecclesiastical system; +and the only threads of light in the dark web of his history are +clerical and theurgic, not lay and human. Voltaire is the +very <i>experimentum crucis</i> of this ugly fact. European +history looks to him what it would have looked to his Jesuit +preceptors, had the sacerdotal element in it been wanting; what +heathen history actually did look to them. He eliminates +the sacerdotal element, and nothing remains but the chaos of apes +and wolves which the Jesuits had taught him to believe was the +original substratum of society. The humanity of his +history—even of his ‘Pucelle +d’Orléans’,—is simply the humanity of +Sanchez and the rest of those <i>vingtquatre Pères</i> who +hang gibbeted for ever in the pages of Pascal. He is +superior to his teachers, certainly, in this, that he has hope +for humanity on earth; dreams of a new and nobler life for +society, by means of a true and scientific knowledge of the laws +of the moral and material universe; in a word, he has, in the +midst of all his filth and his atheism, a faith in a righteous +and truth-revealing God, which the priests who brought him up had +not. Let the truth be spoken, even though in favour of such +a destroying Azrael as Voltaire. And what if his primary +conception of humanity be utterly base? Is that of our +modern historians so much higher? Do Christian men seem to +them, on the whole, in all ages, to have had the spirit of God +with them, leading them into truth, however imperfectly and +confusedly they may have learnt his lessons? Have they ever +heard with their ears, or listened when their fathers have +declared unto them, the noble works which God did in their days, +and in the old time before them? Do they believe that the +path of Christendom has been, on the whole, the path of life and +the right way, and that the living God is leading her +therein? Are they proud of the old British worthies? +Are they jealous and tender of the reputation of their +ancestors? Do they believe that there were any worthies at +all in England before the steam-engine and political economy were +discovered? Do their conceptions of past society and the +past generations retain anything of that great thought which is +common to all the Aryan races—that is, to all races who +have left aught behind them better than mere mounds of +earth—to Hindoo and Persian, Greek and Roman, Teuton and +Scandinavian, that men are the sons of the heroes, who were the +sons of God? Or do they believe that for civilised people +of the nineteenth century it is as well to say as little as +possible about ancestors who possessed our vices without our +amenities, our ignorance without our science; who were bred, no +matter how, like flies by summer heat, out of that everlasting +midden which men call the world, to buzz and sting their foolish +day, and leave behind them a fresh race which knows them not, and +could win no honour by owning them, and which owes them no more +than if it had been produced, as midden-flies were said to be of +old, by some spontaneous generation?</p> +<p>It is not probable that this writer will be likely to +undervalue political economy, or the steam-engine, or any other +solid and practical good which God has unveiled to this +generation. All that he does demand (for he has a right to +demand it) is that rational men should believe that our +forefathers were at least as good as we are; that whatsoever +their measure of light was, they acted up to what they knew as +faithfully as we do; and that, on the whole, it was not their +fault if they did not know more. Even now the real +discoveries of the age are made, as of old, by a very few men; +and, when made, have to struggle, as of old, against all manner +of superstitions, lazinesses, scepticisms. Is the history +of the Minié rifle one so very complimentary to our +age’s quickness of perception that we can afford to throw +many stones at the prejudices of our ancestors? The truth +is that, as of old, ‘many men talk of Robin Hood who never +shot in his bow’; and many talk of Bacon who never +discovered a law by induction since they were born. As far +as our experience goes, those who are loudest in their +jubilations over the wonderful progress of the age are those who +have never helped that progress forward one inch, but find it a +great deal easier and more profitable to use the results which +humbler men have painfully worked out as second-hand capital for +hustings-speeches and railway books, and flatter a +mechanics’ institute of self-satisfied youths by telling +them that the least instructed of them is wiser than Erigena or +Roger Bacon. Let them be. They have their +reward. And so also has the patient and humble man of +science, who, the more he knows, confesses the more how little he +knows, and looks back with affectionate reverence on the great +men of old time—on Archimedes and Ptolemy, Aristotle and +Pliny, and many another honourable man who, walking in great +darkness, sought a ray of light, and did not seek in +vain,—as integral parts of that golden chain of which he is +but one link more; as scientific forefathers, without whose aid +his science could not have had a being.</p> +<p>Meanwhile, this general tone of irreverence for our +forefathers is no hopeful sign. It is unwise to +‘inquire why the former times were better than +these’; to hang lazily and weakly over some eclectic dream +of a past golden age; for to do so is to deny that God is working +in this age, as well as in past ages; that His light is as near +us now as it was to the worthies of old time.</p> +<p>But it is more than unwise to boast and rejoice that the +former times were worse than these; and to teach young people to +say in their hearts, ‘What clever fellows we are, compared +with our stupid old fogies of fathers!’ More than +unwise; for possibly it may be false in fact. To look at +the political and moral state of Europe at this moment, +Christendom can hardly afford to look down on any preceding +century, and seems to be in want of something which neither +science nor constitutional government seems able to supply. +Whether our forefathers also lacked that something we will not +inquire just now; but if they did, their want of scientific and +political knowledge was evidently not the cause of the defect; or +why is not Spain now infinitely better, instead of being +infinitely worse off, than she was three hundred years ago?</p> +<p>At home, too—But on the question whether we are so very +much better off than our forefathers Mr. Froude, not we, must +speak: for he has deliberately, in his new history, set himself +to the solution of this question, and we will not anticipate what +he has to say; what we would rather insist on now are the moral +effects produced on our young people by books which teach them to +look with contempt on all generations but their own, and with +suspicion on all public characters save a few contemporaries of +their own especial party.</p> +<p>There is an ancient Hebrew book, which contains a singular +story concerning a grandson who was cursed because his father +laughed at the frailty of the grandfather. Whether the +reader shall regard that story (as we do) as a literal fact +recorded by inspired wisdom, as an instance of one of the great +root-laws of family life, and therefore of that national life +which (as the Hebrew book so cunningly shows) is the organic +development of the family life; or whether he shall treat it (as +we do not) as a mere apologue or myth, he must confess that it is +equally grand in its simplicity and singular in its unexpected +result. The words of the story, taken literally and simply, +no more justify the notion that Canaan’s slavery was any +magical consequence of the old patriarch’s anger than they +do the well-known theory that it was the cause of the +Negro’s blackness. Ham shows a low, foul, irreverent, +unnatural temper towards his father. The old man’s +shame is not a cause of shame to his son, but only of +laughter. Noah prophesies (in the fullest and deepest +meaning of that word) that a curse will come upon that +son’s son; that he will be a slave of slaves; and reason +and experience show that he spoke truth. Let the young but +see that their fathers have no reverence for the generation +before them, then will they in turn have no reverence for their +fathers. Let them be taught that the sins of their +ancestors involve their own honour so little that they need not +take any trouble to clear the blot off the scutcheon, but may +safely sit down and laugh over it, saying, ‘Very likely it +is true. If so, it is very amusing; and if not—what +matter?’—Then those young people are being bred up in +a habit of mind which contains in itself all the capabilities of +degradation and slavery, in self-conceit, hasty assertion, +disbelief in nobleness, and all the other ‘credulities of +scepticism’: parted from that past from which they take +their common origin, they are parted also from each other, and +become selfish, self-seeking, divided, and therefore weak: +disbelieving in the nobleness of those who have gone before them, +they learn more and more to disbelieve in the nobleness of those +around them; and, by denying God’s works of old, come, by a +just and dreadful Nemesis, to be unable to see his works in the +men of their own day; to suspect and impugn valour, +righteousness, disinterestedness in their contemporaries; to +attribute low motives; to pride themselves on looking at men and +things as ‘men who know the world,’ so the young +puppies style it; to be less and less chivalrous to women, less +and less respectful to old men, less and less ashamed of boasting +about their sensual appetites; in a word, to show all those +symptoms which, when fully developed, leave a generation without +fixed principles, without strong faith, without self-restraint, +without moral cohesion, the sensual and divided prey of any race, +however inferior in scientific knowledge, which has a clear and +fixed notion of its work and destiny. That many of these +signs are themselves more and more ominously showing in our young +men, from the fine gentleman who rides in Rotten Row to the +boy-mechanic who listens enraptured to Mr. Holyoake’s +exposures of the absurdity of all human things save Mr. +Holyoake’s self, is a fact which presses itself most on +those who have watched this age most carefully, and who (rightly +or wrongly) attribute much of this miserable temper to the way in +which history has been written among us for the last hundred +years.</p> +<p>Whether or not Mr. Froude would agree with these notions, he +is more or less responsible for them; for they have been +suggested by his ‘History of England from the Fall of +Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth.’ It was impossible +to read the book without feeling the contrast between its tone +and that of every other account of the times which one had ever +seen. Mr. Froude seems to have set to work upon the +principle, too much ignored in judging of the past, that the +historian’s success must depend on his dramatic faculty; +and not merely on that constructive element of the faculty in +which Mr. Macaulay shows such astonishing power, but on that +higher and deeper critical element which ought to precede the +constructive process, and without which the constructive element +will merely enable a writer, as was once bitterly but truly said, +‘to produce the greatest possible misrepresentation with +the least possible distortion of fact.’ That deeper +dramatic faculty, the critical, is not logical merely, but moral, +and depends on the moral health, the wideness and heartiness of +his moral sympathies, by which he can put himself—as Mr. +Froude has attempted to do, and as we think +successfully—into the place of each and every character, +and not merely feel for them, but feel with them. He does +not merely describe their actions from the outside, attributing +them arbitrarily to motives which are pretty sure to be the +lowest possible, because it is easier to conceive a low motive +than a lofty one, and to call a man a villain than to unravel +patiently the tangled web of good and evil of which his thoughts +are composed. He has attempted to conceive of his +characters as he would if they had been his own contemporaries +and equals, acting, speaking in his company; and he has therefore +thought himself bound to act toward them by those rules of +charity and courtesy, common alike to Christian morals, English +law, and decent society; namely, to hold every man innocent till +he is proved guilty; where a doubt exists, to give the prisoner +at the bar the benefit of it; not to excite the minds of the +public against him by those insinuative or vituperative epithets, +which are but adders and scorpions; and, on the whole, to believe +that a man’s death and burial is not the least reason for +ceasing to behave to him like a gentleman and a Christian. +We are not inclined to play with solemn things, or to copy Lucian +and Quevedo in writing dialogues of the dead; but what dialogues +might some bold pen dash off between the old sons of Anak, at +whose coming Hades has long ago been moved, and to receive whom +all the kings of the nation have risen up, and the little +scribblers who have fancied themselves able to fathom and +describe characters to whom they were but pigmies! Conceive +a half-hour’s interview between Queen Elizabeth and some +popular lady-scribbler, who has been deluding herself into the +fancy that gossiping inventories of millinery are history . . . +‘You pretend to judge me, whose labours, whose cares, whose +fiery trials were, beside yours, as the heaving volcano beside a +boy’s firework? You condemn my weaknesses? Know +that they were stronger than your strength! You impute +motives for my sins? Know that till you are as great as I +have been, for evil and for good, you will be as little able to +comprehend my sins as my righteousness! Poor marsh-croaker, +who wishest not merely to swell up to the bulk of the ox, but to +embrace it in thy little paws, know thine own size, and leave me +to be judged by Him who made me!’ . . . How the poor soul +would shrink back into nothing before that lion eye which saw and +guided the destinies of the world, and all the flunkey-nature (if +such a vice exist beyond the grave) come out in utter abjectness, +as if the ass in the fable, on making his kick at the dead lion, +had discovered to his horror that the lion was alive and +well—Spirit of Quevedo! finish for us the picture which we +cannot finish for ourselves.</p> +<p>In a very different spirit from such has Mr. Froude approached +these times. Great and good deeds were done in them; and it +has therefore seemed probable to him that there were great and +good men there to do them. Thoroughly awake to the fact +that the Reformation was the new birth of the British nation, it +has seemed to him a puzzling theory which attributes its success +to the lust of a tyrant and the cupidity of his courtiers. +It has evidently seemed to him paradoxical that a king who was +reputed to have been a satyr, instead of keeping as many +concubines as seemed good to him, should have chosen to gratify +his passions by entering six times into the strict bonds of +matrimony, religiously observing those bonds. It has seemed +to him even more paradoxical that one reputed to have been the +most sanguinary tyrant who ever disgraced the English throne +should have been not only endured, but loved and regretted by a +fierce and free-spoken people; and he, we suppose, could +comprehend as little as we can the reasoning of such a passage as +the following, especially when it proceeds from the pen of so +wise and venerable a writer as Mr. Hallam.</p> +<p>‘A government administered with so frequent violations, +not only of the chartered privileges of Englishmen, but of those +still more sacred rights which natural law has established, must +have been regarded, one would imagine, with just abhorrence and +earnest longings for a change. Yet contemporary authorities +by no means answer this expectation. Some mention Henry +after his death in language of eulogy;’ (not only +Elizabeth, be it remembered, but Cromwell also, always spoke of +him with deepest respect; and their language always found an echo +in the English heart;) ‘and if we except those whom +attachment to the ancient religion had inspired with hatred to +his memory, few seem to have been aware that his name would +descend to posterity among those of the many tyrants and +oppressors of innocence whom the wrath of Heaven has raised up, +and the servility of man endured.’</p> +<p>The names of even those few we should be glad to have; for it +seems to us that, with the exception of a few ultra-Protestants, +who could not forgive that persecution of the Reformers which he +certainly permitted, if not encouraged, during one period of his +reign, no one adopted the modern view of his character till more +than a hundred years after his death, when belief in all +nobleness and faith had died out among an ignoble and faithless +generation, and the scandalous gossip of such a light rogue as +Osborne was taken into the place of honest and respectful +history.</p> +<p>To clear up such seeming paradoxes as these by carefully +examining the facts of the sixteenth century has been Mr. +Froude’s work; and we have the results of his labour in two +volumes, embracing only a period of eleven years; but giving +promise that the mysteries of the succeeding time will be well +cleared up for us in future volumes, and that we shall find our +forefathers to have been, if no better, at least no worse men +than ourselves. He has brought to the task known talents +and learning, a mastery over English prose almost unequalled in +this generation, a spirit of most patient and good-tempered +research, and that intimate knowledge of human motives and +passions which his former books have shown, and which we have a +right to expect from any scholar who has really profited by +Aristotle’s unrivalled Ethics. He has fairly examined +every contemporary document within his reach, and, as he informs +us in the preface, he has been enabled, through the kindness of +Sir Francis Palgrave, to consult a great number of MSS. relating +to the Reformation, hitherto all but unknown to the public, and +referred to in his work as MSS. in the Rolls’ House, where +the originals are easily accessible. These, he states, he +intends to publish, with additions from his own reading, as soon +as he has brought his history down to the end of Henry the +Eighth’s reign.</p> +<p>But Mr. Froude’s chief text-book seems to have been +State Papers and Acts of Parliament. He has begun his work +in the only temper in which a man can write accurately and well; +in a temper of trust toward the generation whom he +describes. The only temper; for if a man has no affection +for the characters of whom he reads, he will never understand +them; if he has no respect for his subject, he will never take +the trouble to exhaust it. To such an author the Statutes +at large, as the deliberate expression of the nation’s will +and conscience, will appear the most important of all sources of +information; the first to be consulted, the last to be +contradicted; the Canon which is not to be checked and corrected +by private letters and flying pamphlets, but which is to check +and correct them. This seems Mr. Froude’s theory; and +we are at no pains to confess that if he be wrong we see no hope +of arriving at truth. If these public documents are not to +be admitted in evidence before all others, we see no hope for the +faithful and earnest historian; he must give himself up to swim +as he may on the frothy stream of private letters, anecdotes, and +pamphlets, the puppet of the ignorance, credulity, peevishness, +spite, of any and every gossip and scribbler.</p> +<p>Beginning his history with the fall of Wolsey, Mr. Froude +enters, of course, at his first step into the vexed question of +Henry’s divorce: an introductory chapter, on the general +state of England, we shall notice hereafter.</p> +<p>A very short inspection of the method in which he handles the +divorce question gives us at once confidence in his temper and +judgment, and hope that we may at last come to some clearer +understanding of it than the old law gives us, which we have +already quoted, concerning the dog who went mad to serve his +private ends. In a few masterly pages he sketches for us +the rotting and dying Church, which had recovered her power after +the Wars of the Roses over an exhausted nation; but in form only, +not in life. Wolsey, with whom he has fair and +understanding sympathy, he sketches as the transition minister, +‘loving England well, but loving Rome better,’ who +intends a reform of the Church, but who, as the Pope’s +commissioner for that very purpose, is liable to a +<i>præmunire</i>, and therefore dare not appeal to +Parliament to carry out his designs, even if he could have +counted on the Parliament’s assistance in any measures +designed to invigorate the Church. At last arises in the +divorce question the accident which brings to an issue on its +most vital point the question of Papal power in England, and +which finally draws down ruin upon Wolsey himself.</p> +<p>This appears to have begun in the winter of +1526–27. It was proposed to marry the Princess Mary +to a son of the French king. The Bishop of Tarbés, +who conducted the negotiations, advised himself, apparently by +special instigation of the evil spirit, to raise a question as to +her legitimacy.</p> +<p>No more ingenious plan for convulsing England could have been +devised. The marriage from which Mary sprang only stood on +a reluctant and doubtful dispensation of the Pope’s. +Henry had entered into it at the entreaty of his ministers, +contrary to a solemn promise given to his father, and in spite of +the remonstrances of the Archbishop of Canterbury. No +blessing seemed to have rested on it. All his children had +died young, save this one sickly girl: a sure note of divine +displeasure in the eyes of that coarse-minded Church which has +always declared the chief, if not the only, purpose of marriage +to be the procreation of children.</p> +<p>But more: to question Mary’s legitimacy was to throw +open the question of succession to half a dozen ambitious +competitors. It was, too probably, to involve England at +Henry’s death in another civil war of the Roses, and in all +the internecine horrors which were still rankling in the memories +of men; and probably, also, to bring down a French or Scotch +invasion. There was then too good reason, as Mr. Froude +shows at length, for Wolsey’s assertion to John +Cassalis—‘If his Holiness, which God forbid, shall +show himself unwilling to listen to the King’s demands, to +me assuredly it will be but grief to live longer, for the +innumerable evils which I foresee will follow . . . Nothing +before us but universal and inevitable ruin.’ Too +good reason there was for the confession of the Pope himself to +Gardner, ‘What danger it was to the realm to have this +thing hang in suspense . . . That without an heir-male, etc., the +realm was like to come to dissolution.’ Too good +reason for the bold assertion of the Cardinal-Governor of +Bologna, that ‘he knew the guise of England as few men did, +and that if the King should die without heirs-male, he was sure +that it would cost two hundred thousand men’s lives; and +that to avoid this mischief by a second marriage, he thought, +would deserve heaven.’ Too good reason for the +assertion of Hall, that ‘all indifferent and discreet +persons judged it necessary for the Pope to grant Henry a +divorce, and, by enabling him to marry again, give him the hope +of an undisputed heir-male.’ The Pope had full power +to do this; in fact, such cases had been for centuries integral +parts of his jurisdiction as head of Christendom. But he +was at once too timid and too time-serving to exercise his +acknowledged authority; and thus, just at the very moment when +his spiritual power was being tried in the balance, he chose +himself to expose his political power to the same test. +Both were equally found wanting. He had, it appeared, as +little heart to do justice among kings and princes as he had to +seek and to save the souls of men; and the Reformation followed +as a matter of course.</p> +<p>Through the tangled brakes of this divorce question Mr. Froude +leads us with ease and grace, throwing light, and even beauty, +into dark nooks where before all was mist, not merely by his +intimate acquaintance with the facts, but still more by his deep +knowledge of human character, and of woman’s even more than +of man’s. For the first time the actors in this long +tragedy appear to us as no mere bodiless and soulless names, but +as beings of like passions with ourselves, comprehensible, +coherent, organic, even in their inconsistencies. Catherine +of Arragon is still the Catherine of Shakspeare; but Mr. Froude +has given us the key to many parts of her story which Shakspeare +left unexplained, and delicately enough has made us understand +how Henry’s affections, if he ever had any for +her—faithfully as he had kept (with one exception) to that +loveless <i>mariage de convenance</i>—may have been +gradually replaced by indifference and even dislike, long before +the divorce was forced on him as a question not only of duty to +the nation, but of duty to Heaven. And that he did see it +in this latter light, Mr. Froude brings proof from his own words, +from which we can escape only by believing that the confessedly +honest ‘Bluff King Hal’ had suddenly become a +consummate liar and a canting hypocrite.</p> +<p>Delicately, too, as if speaking of a lady whom he had met in +modern society (as a gentleman is bound to do), does Mr. Froude +touch on the sins of that hapless woman, who played for +Henry’s crown, and paid for it with her life. With +all mercy and courtesy he gives us proof (for he thinks it his +duty to do so) of the French mis-education, the petty cunning, +the tendency to sensuality, the wilful indelicacy of her position +in Henry’s household as the rival of his queen, which made +her last catastrophe at least possible. Of the justice of +her sentence he has no doubt, any more than of her pre-engagement +to some one, as proved by a letter existing among +Cromwell’s papers. Poor thing! If she did that +which was laid to her charge, and more, she did nothing, after +all, but what she had been in the habit of seeing the queens and +princesses of the French court do notoriously, and laugh over +shamelessly; while, as Mr. Froude well says, ‘If we are to +hold her entirely free from guilt, we place not only the King, +but the Privy Council, the Judges, the Lords and Commons, and the +two Houses of Convocation, in a position fatal to their honour +and degrading to ordinary humanity’ (Mr. Froude should have +added Anne Boleyn’s own uncle, the Duke of Norfolk, and her +father, who were on the commission appointed to try her lovers, +and her cousin, Anthony St. Leger, a man of the very highest +character and ability, who was on the jury which found a true +bill against her). ‘We can not,’ continues Mr. +Froude, ‘acquiesce without inquiry in so painful a +conclusion. The English nation also, as well as she, +deserves justice at our hands; and it cannot be thought +uncharitable if we look with some scrutiny at the career of a +person who, but for the catastrophe with which it closed, would +not have so readily obtained forgiveness for having admitted the +addresses of the King, or for having received the homage of the +court as its future sovereign, while the King’s wife, her +mistress, as yet resided under the same roof.’ Mr. +Froude’s conclusion is, after examining the facts, the same +with the whole nation of England in Henry’s reign: but no +one can accuse him of want of sympathy with the unhappy woman, +who reads the eloquent and affecting account of her trial and +death, which ends his second volume. Our only fear is, that +by having thus told the truth he has, instead of justifying our +ancestors, only added one more to the list of people who are to +be ‘given up’ with a cynical shrug and smile. +We have heard already, and among young ladies too, who can be as +cynical as other people in these times, such speeches as, +‘Well, I suppose he has proved Anne Boleyn to be a bad +creature; but that does not make that horrid Henry any more right +in cutting off her head.’ Thus two people will be +despised where only one was before, and the fact still ignored, +that it is just as senseless to say that Henry cut off Anne +Boleyn’s head as that Queen Victoria hanged Palmer. +Death, and death of a far more horrible kind than that which Anne +Boleyn suffered, was the established penalty of the offences of +which she was convicted: and which had in her case this fearful +aggravation, that they were offences not against Henry merely, +but against the whole English nation. She had been married +in order that there might be an undisputed heir to the throne, +and a fearful war avoided. To throw into dispute, by any +conduct of hers, the legitimacy of her own offspring, argued a +levity or a hard-heartedness which of itself deserved the +severest punishment.</p> +<p>We will pass from this disagreeable topic to Mr. +Froude’s lifelike sketch of Pope Clement, and the endless +tracasseries into which his mingled weakness and cunning led him, +and which, like most crooked dealings, ended by defeating their +own object. Pages 125 <i>et sqq.</i> of Vol. I. contain +sketches of him, his thoughts and ways, as amusing as they are +historically important; but we have no space to quote from +them. It will be well for those to whom the Reformation is +still a matter of astonishment to read those pages, and consider +what manner of man he was, in spite of all pretended divine +authority, under whose rule the Romish system received its +irrecoverable wound.</p> +<p>But of all these figures, not excepting Henry’s own, +Wolsey stands out as the most grand and tragical; and Mr. Froude +has done good service to history, if only in making us understand +at last the wondrous ‘butcher’s son.’ +Shakspeare seems to have felt (though he could explain the reason +neither to his auditors nor, perhaps, to himself) that Wolsey +was, on the whole, an heroical man. Mr. Froude shows at +once his strength and his weakness; his deep sense of the +rottenness of the Church; his purpose to purge her from those +abominations which were as well known, it seems, to him as they +were afterwards to the whole people of England; his vast schemes +for education; his still vaster schemes for breaking the alliance +with Spain, and uniting France and England as fellow-servants of +the Pope, and twin-pillars of the sacred fabric of the Church, +which helped so much toward his interest in Catherine’s +divorce, as a ‘means’ (these are his own words) +‘to bind my most excellent sovereign and this glorious +realm to the holy Roman See in faith and obedience for +ever’; his hopes of deposing the Emperor, putting down the +German heresies, and driving back the Turks beyond the pale of +Christendom; his pathetic confession to the Bishop of Bayonne +that ‘if he could only see the divorce arranged, the King +re-married, the succession settled, and the laws and the Church +reformed, he would retire from the world, and would serve God the +remainder of his days.’</p> +<p>Peace be with him! He was surely a noble soul; misled, +it may be—as who is not when his turn comes?—by the +pride of conscious power; and ‘though he loved England +well, yet loving Rome better’: but still it is a comfort to +see, either in past or in present, one more brother whom we need +not despise, even though he may have wasted his energies on a +dream.</p> +<p>And on a dream he did waste them, in spite of all his +cunning. As Mr. Froude, in a noble passage, +says:—</p> +<blockquote><p>‘Extravagant as his hopes seem, the prospect +of realising them was, humanly speaking, neither chimerical nor +even improbable. He had but made the common mistake of men +of the world, who are the representatives of an old order of +things, when that order is doomed and dying. He could not +read the signs of the times; and confounding the barrenness of +death with the barrenness of winter, which might be followed by a +new spring and summer, he believed that the old life-tree of +Catholicism, which in fact was but cumbering the ground, might +bloom again in its old beauty. The thing which he called +heresy was the fire of Almighty God, which no politic +congregation of princes, no state machinery, though it were never +so active, could trample out; and as, in the early years of +Christianity, the meanest slave who was thrown to the wild beasts +for his presence at the forbidden mysteries of the Gospel saw +deeper, in the divine power of his faith, into the future even of +this earthly world, than the sagest of his imperial +persecutors,—so a truer political prophet than Wolsey would +have been found in the most ignorant of those poor men for whom +his police were searching in the purlieus of London, who were +risking death and torture in disseminating the pernicious volumes +of the English Testament.’</p> +</blockquote> +<p>It will be seen from this magnificent passage that Mr. Froude +is distinctly a Protestant. He is one, to judge from his +book; and all the better one, because he can sympathise with +whatsoever nobleness, even with whatsoever mere conservatism, +existed in the Catholic party. And therefore, because he +has sympathies which are not merely party ones, but human ones, +he has given the world, in these two volumes, a history of the +early Reformation altogether unequalled. This human +sympathy, while it has enabled him to embalm in most affecting +prose the sad story of the noble though mistaken Carthusians, and +to make even the Nun of Kent interesting, because truly womanly, +in her very folly and deceit, has enabled him likewise to show us +the hearts of the early martyrs as they never have been shown +before. His sketch of the Christian Brothers, and his +little true romance of Anthony Dalaber, the Oxford student, are +gems of writing; while his conception of Latimer, on whom he +looks as the hero of the movement, and all but an English Luther, +is as worthy of Latimer as it is of himself. It is written +as history should be, discriminatingly, patiently, and yet +lovingly and genially; rejoicing not in evil, but in the truth; +and rejoicing still more in goodness, where goodness can honestly +be found.</p> +<p>To the ecclesiastical and political elements in the English +Reformation Mr. Froude devotes a large portion of his book. +We shall not enter into the questions which he discusses +therein. That aspect of the movement is a foreign and a +delicate subject, from discussing which a Scotch periodical may +be excused. <a name="citation246"></a><a href="#footnote246" +class="citation">[246]</a> North Britain had a somewhat +different problem to solve from her southern sister, and solved +it in an altogether different way: but this we must say, that the +facts and, still more, the State Papers (especially the petition +of the Commons, as contrasted with the utterly benighted answer +of the Bishops) which Mr. Froude gives are such as to raise our +opinion of the method on which the English part of the +Reformation was conducted, and make us believe that in this, as +in other matters, both Henry and his Parliament, though still +doctrinal Romanists, were sound-headed practical Englishmen.</p> +<p>This result is of the same kind as most of those at which Mr. +Froude arrives. They form altogether a general +justification of our ancestors in Henry the Eighth’s time, +if not of Henry the Eighth himself, which frees Mr. Froude from +that charge of irreverence to the past generations against which +we protested in the beginning of the article. We hope +honestly that he may be as successful in his next volumes as he +has been in these, in vindicating the worthies of the sixteenth +century. Whether he shall fail or not, and whether or not +he has altogether succeeded, in the volumes before us, his book +marks a new epoch, and, we trust, a healthier and loftier one, in +English history. We trust that they inaugurate a time in +which the deeds of our forefathers shall be looked on as sacred +heirlooms; their sins as our shame, their victories as bequests +to us; when men shall have sufficient confidence in those to whom +they owe their existence to scrutinise faithfully and patiently +every fact concerning them, with a proud trust that, search as +they may, they will not find much of which to be ashamed.</p> +<p>Lastly, Mr. Froude takes a view of Henry’s character, +not, indeed, new (for it is the original one), but obsolete for +now two hundred years. Let it be well understood that he +makes no attempt (he has been accused thereof) to whitewash +Henry: all that he does is to remove as far as he can the modern +layers of ‘black-wash,’ and to let the man himself, +fair or foul, be seen. For the result he is not +responsible: it depends on facts; and unless Mr. Froude has +knowingly concealed facts to an amount of which even a Lingard +might be ashamed, the result is that Henry the Eighth was +actually very much the man which he appeared to be to the English +nation in his own generation, and for two or three generations +after his death—a result which need not astonish us, if we +will only give our ancestors credit for having at least as much +common sense as ourselves, and believe (why should we not?) that, +on the whole, they understood their own business better than we +are likely to do.</p> +<p>‘The bloated tyrant,’ it is confessed, contrived +somehow or other to be popular enough. Mr. Froude tells us +the reasons. He was not born a bloated tyrant, any more +than Queen Elizabeth (though the fact is not generally known) was +born a wizened old woman. He was from youth, till he was +long past his grand climacteric, a very handsome, powerful, and +active man, temperate in his habits, good-humoured, frank and +honest in his speech (as even his enemies are forced to +confess). He seems to have been (as his portraits prove +sufficiently), for good and for evil, a thorough John Bull; a +thorough Englishman: but one of the very highest type.</p> +<blockquote><p>‘Had he died (says Mr. Froude) previous to +the first agitation of the divorce, his loss would have been +deplored as one of the heaviest misfortunes which had ever +befallen this country, and he would have left a name which would +have taken its place in history by the side of the Black Prince +or the Conqueror of Agincourt. Left at the most trying age, +with his character unformed, with the means of gratifying every +inclination, and married by his ministers, when a boy, to an +unattractive woman far his senior, he had lived for thirty-six +years almost without blame, and bore through England the +reputation of an upright and virtuous king. Nature had been +prodigal to him of her rarest gifts . . . Of his intellectual +ability we are not left to judge from the suspicious panegyrics +of his contemporaries. His State Papers and letters may be +placed by the side of those of Wolsey or of Cromwell, and they +lose nothing by the comparison. Though they are broadly +different, the perception is equally clear, the expression +equally powerful; and they breathe throughout an irresistible +vigour of purpose. In addition to this, he had a fine +musical taste, carefully cultivated; he spoke and wrote in four +languages; and his knowledge of a multitude of subjects, with +which his versatile ability made him conversant, would have +formed the reputation of any ordinary man. He was among the +best physicians of his age. He was his own engineer, +inventing improvements in artillery and new constructions in +shipbuilding; and this not with the condescending incapacity of a +royal amateur, but with thorough workmanlike understanding. +His reading was vast, especially in theology. He was +‘attentive,’ as it is called, ‘to his religious +duties,’ being present at the services in chapel two or +three times a day with unfailing regularity, and showing, to +outward appearance, a real sense of religious obligation in the +energy and purity of his life. In private he was +good-humoured and good-natured. His letters to his +secretaries, though never undignified, are simple, easy, and +unrestrained, and the letters written by them to him are +similarly plain and business-like, as if the writers knew that +the person whom they were addressing disliked compliments, and +chose to be treated as a man. He seems to have been always +kind, always considerate; inquiring into their private concerns +with genuine interest, and winning, as a consequence, their +sincere and unaffected attachment. As a ruler he had been +eminently popular. All his wars had been successful. +He had the splendid tastes in which the English people most +delighted; . . . he had more than once been tried with +insurrection, which he had soothed down without bloodshed, and +extinguished in forgiveness . . . And it is certain that if he +had died before the divorce was mooted, Henry VIII., like the +Roman emperor said by Tacitus to have been <i>censensu omnium +dignus imperii nisi imperasset</i>, would have been considered by +posterity as formed by Providence for the conduct of the +Reformation, and his loss would have been deplored as a perpetual +calamity.’</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Mr. Froude has, of course, not written these words without +having facts whereby to prove them. One he gives in an +important note containing an extract from a letter of the +Venetian Ambassador in 1515. At least, if his conclusions +be correct, we must think twice ere we deny his assertion that +‘the man best able of all living Englishmen to govern +England had been set to do it by the conditions of his +birth.’</p> +<p>‘We are bound,’ as Mr. Froude says, ‘to +allow him the benefit of his past career, and be careful to +remember it in interpreting his later actions.’ +‘The true defect in his moral constitution, that +“intense and imperious will” common to all princes of +the Plantagenet blood, had not yet been tested.’ That +he did, in his later years, act in many ways neither wisely nor +well, no one denies; that his conduct did not alienate the hearts +of his subjects is what needs explanation; and Mr. Froude’s +opinions on this matter, novel as they are, and utterly opposed +to that of the standard modern historians, require careful +examination. Now I am not inclined to debate Henry the +Eighth’s character, or any other subject, as between Mr. +Froude and an author of the obscurantist or pseudo-conservative +school. Mr. Froude is Liberal; and so am I. I wish to +look at the question as between Mr. Froude and other Liberals; +and therefore, of course, first, as between Mr. Froude and Mr. +Hallam.</p> +<p>Mr. Hallam’s name is so venerable and his work so +Important, that to set ourselves up as judges in this or in any +matter between him and Mr. Froude would be mere impertinence: but +speaking merely as learners, we have surely a right to inquire +why Mr. Hallam has entered on the whole question of Henry’s +relations to his Parliament with a <i>præjudicium</i> +against them; for which Mr. Froude finds no ground whatsoever in +fact. Why are all acts both of Henry and his Parliament to +be taken <i>in malam partem</i>? They were not Whigs, +certainly: neither were Socrates and Plato, nor even St. Paul and +St. John. They may have been honest men as men go, or they +may not: but why is there to be a feeling against them rather +than for them? Why is Henry always called a tyrant, and his +Parliament servile? The epithets have become so common and +unquestioned that our interrogation may seem startling. +Still we make it. Why was Henry a tyrant? That may be +true, but must be proved by facts. Where are they? Is +the mere fact of a monarch’s asking for money a crime in +him and his ministers? The question would rather seem to +be, Were the moneys for which Henry asked needed or no; and, when +granted, were they rightly or wrongly applied? And on these +subjects we want much more information than we obtain from any +epithets. The author of a constitutional history should +rise above epithets: or, if he uses them, should corroborate them +by facts. Why should not historians be as fair and as +cautious in accusing Henry and Wolsey as they would be in +accusing Queen Victoria and Lord Palmerston? What right, +allow us to ask, has a grave constitutional historian to say that +‘We cannot, indeed, doubt that the unshackled and despotic +condition of his friend, Francis I., afforded a mortifying +contrast to Henry? What document exists in which Henry is +represented as regretting that he is the king of a free +people?—for such Mr. Hallam confesses, just above, England +was held to be, and was actually in comparison with France. +If the document does not exist, Mr. Hallam has surely stepped out +of the field of the historian into that of the novelist, +<i>à la</i> Scott or Dumas. The Parliament sometimes +grants Henry’s demands: sometimes it refuses them, and he +has to help himself by other means. Why are both cases to +be interpreted <i>in malam partem</i>? Why is the +Parliament’s granting to be always a proof of its +servility?—its refusing always a proof of Henry’s +tyranny and rapacity? Both views are mere +<i>præjudicia</i>, reasonable perhaps, and possible: but +why is not a <i>præjudicium</i> of the opposite kind as +rational and as possible? Why has not a historian a right +to start, as Mr. Froude does, by taking for granted that both +parties may have been on the whole right; that the Parliament +granted certain sums because Henry was right in asking for them; +refused others because Henry was wrong; even that, in some cases, +Henry may have been right in asking, the Parliament wrong in +refusing; and that in such a case, under the pressure of critical +times, Henry was forced to get as he could the money which he saw +that the national cause required? Let it be as folks +will. Let Henry be sometimes right, and the Parliament +sometimes likewise; or the Parliament always right, or Henry +always right; or anything else, save this strange diseased theory +that both must have been always wrong, and that, evidence to that +effect failing, motives must be insinuated, or openly asserted, +from the writer’s mere imagination. This may be a +dream: but it is as easy to imagine as the other, and more +pleasant also. It will probably be answered (though not by +Mr. Hallam himself) by a sneer: ‘You do not seem to know +much of the world, sir.’ But so would Figaro and Gil +Blas have said, and on exactly the same grounds.</p> +<p>Let us examine a stock instance of Henry’s +‘rapacity’ and his Parliament’s servility, +namely, the exactions in 1524 and 1525, and the subsequent +‘release of the King’s debts.’ What are +the facts of the case? France and Scotland had attacked +England in 1514. The Scotch were beaten at Flodden. +The French lost Tournay and Thérouenne, and, when peace +was made, agreed to pay the expenses of the war. Times +changed, and the expenses were not paid.</p> +<p>A similar war arose in 1524, and cost England immense +sums. A large army was maintained on the Scotch Border, +another army invaded France; and Wolsey, not venturing to call a +Parliament,—because he was, as Pope’s legate, liable +to a <i>præmunire</i>,—raised money by contributions +and benevolences, which were levied, it seems on the whole, +uniformly and equally (save that they weighed more heavily on the +rich than on the poor, if that be a fault), and differed from +taxes only in not having received the consent of +Parliament. Doubtless, this was not the best way of raising +money: but what if, under the circumstances, it were the only +one? What if, too, on the whole, the money so raised was +really given willingly by the nation? The sequel alone +could decide that.</p> +<p>The first contribution for which Wolsey asked was paid. +The second was resisted, and was not paid; proving thereby that +the nation need not pay unless it chose. The court gave +way; and the war became defensive only till 1525.</p> +<p>Then the tide turned. The danger, then, was not from +Francis, but from the Emperor. Francis was taken prisoner +at Pavia; and shortly after Rome was sacked by Bourbon.</p> +<p>The effect of all this in England is told at large in Mr. +Froude’s second chapter. Henry became bond for +Francis’s ransom, to be paid to the Emperor. He spent +500,000 crowns more in paying the French army; and in the terms +of peace made with France, a sum-total was agreed on for the +whole debt, old and new, to be paid as soon as possible; and an +annual pension of 500,000 crowns besides. The French +exchequer, however, still remained bankrupt, and again the money +was not paid.</p> +<p>Parliament, when it met in 1529, reviewed the circumstances of +the expenditure, and finding it all such as the nation on the +whole approved, legalised the taxation by benevolences +retrospectively: and this is the whole mare’s nest of the +first payment of Henry’s debts; if, at least, any faith is +to be put in the preamble of the Act for the release of the +King’s Debts, 21 Hen. VIII. c. 24. ‘The +King’s loving subjects, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, +and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, calling to +remembrance the inestimable costs, charges, and expenses which +the King’s Highness hath necessarily been compelled to +support and sustain since his assumption to his crown, estate, +and dignity royal, as well for the extinction of a right +dangerous and damnable schism, sprung in the Church, as for the +modifying the insatiable and inordinate ambition of them who, +while aspiring to the monarchy of Christendom, did put universal +troubles and divisions in the same, intending, if they might, not +only to have subdued this realm, but also all the rest, unto +their power and subjection—for resistance whereof the +King’s Highness was compelled to marvellous +charges—both for the supportation of sundry armies by sea +and land, and also for divers and manifold contribution on hand, +to save and keep his own subjects at home in rest and +repose—which hath been so politically handled that, when +the most part of all Christian lands have been infested with +cruel wars, the great Head and Prince of the world (the Pope) +brought into captivity, cities and towns taken, spoiled, burnt, +and sacked—the King’s said subjects in all this time, +by the high providence and politic means of his Grace, have been +nevertheless preserved, defended, and maintained from all these +inconvenients, etc.</p> +<p>‘Considering, furthermore, that his Highness, in and +about the premises, hath been fain to employ not only all such +sums of money as hath risen or grown by contributions made unto +his Grace by his loving subjects—but also, over and above +the same, sundry other notable and excellent sums of his own +treasure and yearly revenues, among which manifold great sums so +employed, his Highness also, as is notoriously known, and as doth +evidently appear by the <span class="GutSmall">ACCOUNTS OF THE +SAME</span>, hath to that use, and none other, converted all such +money as by any of his subjects hath been advanced to his Grace +by way of prest or loan, either particularly, or by any taxation +made of the same—being things so well collocate and +bestowed, seeing the said high and great fruits and effects +thereof insured to the surety and commodity and tranquillity of +this realm—of our mind and consent, do freely, absolutely, +give and grant to the King’s Highness all and every sum or +sums of money,’ etc.</p> +<p>The second release of the King’s debts, in 1544, is very +similar. The King’s debts and necessities were +really, when we come to examine them, those of the nation: in +1538–40 England was put into a thorough state of defence +from end to end. Fortresses were built along the Scottish +Border, and all along the coast opposite France and +Flanders. The people were drilled and armed, the fleet +equipped; and the nation, for the time, became one great +army. And nothing but this, as may be proved by an +overwhelming mass of evidence, saved the country from +invasion. Here were enormous necessary expenses which must +be met.</p> +<p>In 1543 a million crowns were to have been paid by Francis the +First as part of his old debt. It was not paid: but, on the +contrary, Henry had to go to war for it. The nation again +relinquished their claim, and allowed Henry to raise another +benevolence in 1545, concerning which Mr. Hallam tells us a great +deal, but not one word of the political circumstances which led +to it or to the release, keeping his sympathies and his paper for +the sorrows of refractory Alderman Reed, who, refusing (alone of +all the citizens) to contribute to the support of troops on the +Scotch Border or elsewhere, was sent down, by a sort of rough +justice, to serve on the Scotch Border himself, and judge of the +‘perils of the nation’ with his own eyes; and +being—one is pleased to hear—taken prisoner by the +Scots, had to pay a great deal more as ransom than he would have +paid as benevolence.</p> +<p>But to return. What proof is there, in all this, of that +servility which most historians, and Mr. Hallam among the rest, +are wont to attribute to Henry’s Parliaments? What +feeling appears on the face of this document, which we have given +and quoted, but one honourable to the nation? Through the +falsehood of a foreign nation the King is unable to perform his +engagements to the people. Is not the just and generous +course in such a case to release him from those +engagements? Does this preamble, does a single fact of the +case, justify historians in talking of these ‘king’s +debts’ in just the same tone as that in which they would +have spoken if the King had squandered the money on private +pleasures? Perhaps most people who write small histories +believe that this really was the case. They certainly would +gather no other impression from the pages of Mr. Hallam. No +doubt the act must have been burdensome on some people. +Many, we are told, had bequeathed their promissory notes to their +children, used their reversionary interest in the loan in many +ways; and these, of course, felt the change very heavily. +No doubt: but why have we not a right to suppose that the +Parliament were aware of that fact; but chose it as the less of +the two evils? The King had spent the money; he was unable +to recover it from Francis; could only refund it by raising some +fresh tax or benevolence: and why may not the Parliament have +considered the release of old taxes likely to offend fewer people +than the imposition of new ones? It is certainly an ugly +thing to break public faith; but to prove that public faith was +broken, we must prove that Henry compelled the Parliament to +release him; if the act was of their own free will, no public +faith was broken, for they were the representatives of the +nation, and through them the nation forgave its own debt. +And what evidence have we that they did not represent the nation, +and that, on the whole, we must suppose, as we should in the case +of any other men, that they best knew their own business? +May we not apply to this case, and to others, <i>mutatis +mutandis</i>, the argument which Mr. Froude uses so boldly and +well in the case of Anne Boleyn’s trial—‘The +English nation also, as well as . . . deserves justice at our +hands?’</p> +<p>Certainly it does: but it is a disagreeable token of the +method on which we have been accustomed to write the history of +our own forefathers, that Mr. Froude should find it necessary to +state formally so very simple a truth.</p> +<p>What proof, we ask again, is there that this old Parliament +was ‘servile’? Had that been so, Wolsey would +not have been afraid to summon it. The specific reason for +not summoning a Parliament for six years after that of 1524 was +that they were not servile; that when (here we are quoting Mr. +Hallam, and not Mr. Froude) Wolsey entered the House of Commons +with a great train, seemingly for the purpose of intimidation, +they ‘made no other answer to his harangues than that it +was their usage to debate only among themselves.’ The +debates on this occasion lasted fifteen or sixteen days, during +which, says an eye-witness, ‘there has been the greatest +and sorest hold in the Lower House,’ ‘the matter +debated and beaten’; ‘such hold that the House was +like to have been dissevered’; in a word, hard +fighting—and why not honest fighting?—between the +court party and the Opposition, ‘which ended,’ says +Mr. Hallam, ‘in the court party obtaining, with the utmost +difficulty, a grant much inferior to the Cardinal’s +original requisition.’ What token of servility is +here?</p> +<p>And is it reasonable to suppose that after Wolsey was +conquered, and a comparatively popular ministry had succeeded, +and that memorable Parliament of 1529 (which Mr. Froude, not +unjustly, thinks more memorable than the Long Parliament itself) +began its great work with a high hand, backed not merely by the +King, but by the public opinion of the majority of England, their +decisions are likely to have been more servile than before? +If they resisted the King when they disagreed with him, are they +to be accused of servility because they worked with him when they +agreed with him? Is an Opposition always in the right; a +ministerial party always in the wrong? Is it an offence +against the people to agree with the monarch, even when he agrees +with the people himself? Simple as these questions are, one +must really stop to ask them.</p> +<p>No doubt pains were often taken to secure elections favourable +to the Government. Are none taken now? Are not more +taken now? Will any historian show us the documents which +prove the existence, in the sixteenth century, of Reform Club, +Carlton Club, whippers-in and nominees, governmental and +opposition, and all the rest of the beautiful machinery which +protects our Reformed Parliament from the evil influences of +bribery and corruption? Pah!—We have somewhat too +much glass in our modern House to afford to throw stones at our +forefathers’ old St. Stephen’s. At the worst, +what was done then but that without which it is said to be +impossible to carry on a Government now? Take an instance +from the Parliament of 1539, one in which there is no doubt +Government influence was used in order to prevent as much as +possible the return of members favourable to the clergy—for +the good reason that the clergy were no doubt, on their own side, +intimidating voters by all those terrors of the unseen world +which had so long been to them a source of boundless profit and +power.</p> +<p>Cromwell writes to the King to say that he has secured a seat +for a certain Sir Richard Morrison; but for what purpose? +As one who no doubt ‘should be ready to answer and take up +such as should crack or face with literature of learning, if any +such should be.’ There was, then, free discussion; +they expected clever and learned speakers in the Opposition, and +on subjects of the deepest import, not merely political, but +spiritual; and the Government needed men to answer such. +What more natural than that so close on the ‘Pilgrimage of +Grace,’ and in the midst of so great dangers at home and +abroad, the Government should have done their best to secure a +well-disposed House (one would like to know when they would +not)? But surely the very effort (confessedly exceptional) +and the acknowledged difficulty prove that Parliament were no +mere ‘registrars of edicts.’</p> +<p>But the strongest argument against the tyranny of the Tudors, +and especially of Henry VIII. in his ‘benevolences,’ +is derived from the state of the people themselves. If +these benevolences had been really unpopular, they would not have +been paid. In one case we have seen, a benevolence was not +paid for that very reason. For the method of the Tudor +sovereigns, like that of their predecessors, was the very +opposite to that of tyrants in every age and country. The +first act of a tyrant has always been to disarm the people, and +to surround himself with a standing army. The Tudor method +was, as Mr. Froude shows us by many interesting facts, to keep +the people armed and drilled, even to compel them to learn the +use of weapons. Throughout England spread one vast military +organisation, which made every adult a soldier, and enabled him +to find, at a day’s notice, his commanding officer, whether +landlord, sheriff, or lieutenant of the county; so that, as a +foreign ambassador of the time remarks with astonishment (we +quote from memory), ‘England is the strongest nation on +earth, for though the King has not a single mercenary soldier, he +can raise in three days an army of two hundred thousand +men.’</p> +<p>And of what temper those men were it is well known +enough. Mr. Froude calls them—and we beg leave to +endorse, without exception, Mr. Froude’s +opinion—‘A sturdy high-hearted race, sound in body +and fierce in spirit, and furnished with thews and sinews which, +under the stimulus of those “great shins of beef,” +their common diet, were the wonder of the age.’ +‘What comyn folke in all this world,’ says a State +Paper in 1515, ‘may compare with the comyns of England in +riches, freedom, liberty, welfare, and all prosperity? What +comyn folk is so mighty, so strong in the felde, as the comyns of +England?’ In authentic stories of actions under Henry +VIII.—and, we will add, under Elizabeth +likewise—where the accuracy of the account is undeniable, +no disparity of force made Englishmen shrink from enemies +whenever they could meet them. Again and again a few +thousands of them carried dismay into the heart of France. +Four hundred adventurers, vagabond apprentices of London, who +formed a volunteer corps in the Calais garrison, were for years, +Hall says, the terror of Normandy. In the very frolic of +conscious power they fought and plundered without pay, without +reward, save what they could win for themselves; and when they +fell at last, they fell only when surrounded by six times their +number, and were cut to pieces in careless desperation. +Invariably, by friend and foe alike, the English are described as +the fiercest people in all Europe—English wild beasts +Benvenuto Cellini calls them; and this great physical power they +owed to the profuse abundance in which they lived, to the +soldier’s training in which every one of them was bred from +childhood.</p> +<p>Mr. Froude’s novel assertion about profuse abundance +must be weighed by those who have read his invaluable +introductory chapter. But we must ask at once how it was +possible to levy on such an armed populace a tax which they were +determined not to pay, and felt that they were not bound to pay, +either in law or justice? Conceive Lord Palmerston’s +sending down to demand a ‘benevolence’ from the army +at Aldershot, beginning with the general in command and +descending to the privates . . . What would be the +consequences? Ugly enough: but gentle in comparison with +those of any attempt to exact a really unpopular tax from a +nation of well-armed Englishmen, unless they, on the whole, +thought the tax fit to be paid. They would grumble, of +course, whether they intended to pay or not,—for were they +not Englishmen, our own flesh and blood?—and grumble all +the more in person, because they had no Press to grumble for +them: but what is there then in the M.P.’s letter to Lord +Surrey, quoted by Mr. Hallam, p. 25, or in the more pointed +letter of Warham’s, two pages on, which we do not see lying +on our breakfast tables in half the newspapers every week? +Poor, pedantic, obstructive old Warham, himself very angry at so +much being asked of his brother clergymen, and at their being +sworn as to the value of their goods (so like are old times to +new ones); and being, on the whole, of opinion that the world +(the Church included) is going to the devil, says that as he has +been ‘showed in a secret manner of his friends, the people +sore grudgeth and murmureth, and speaketh cursedly among +themselves, as far as they dare, saying they shall never have +rest of payments as long as some liveth, and that they had better +die than thus be continually handed, reckoning themselves, their +wives and children, as despoulit, and not greatly caring what +they do, or what becomes of them.’</p> +<p>Very dreadful—if true: which last point depends very +much upon who Warham was. Now, on reading Mr. +Froude’s or any other good history, we shall find that +Warham was one of the leaders of that despondent party which will +always have its antitype in England. Have we, too, not +heard within the last seven years similar prophecies of +desolation, mourning, and woe—of the Church tottering on +the verge of ruin, the peasantry starving under the horrors of +free trade, noble families reduced to the verge of beggary by +double income-tax? Even such a prophet seems Warham to have +been—of all people in that day, one of the last whom one +would have asked for an opinion.</p> +<p>Poor old Warham, however, was not so far wrong in this +particular case; for the ‘despoulit’ slaves of +Suffolk, not content with grumbling, rose up with sword and bow, +and vowed that they would not pay. Whereon the bloated +tyrant sent his prætorians, and enforced payment by scourge +and thumbscrew? Not in the least. They would not pay; +and therefore, being free men, nobody could make them pay; and +although in the neighbouring county of Norfolk, from twenty +pounds (<i>i.e.</i> £200 of our money) upward—for the +tax was not levied on men of less substance—there were not +twenty but what had consented; and though there was ‘great +likelihood that this grant should be much more than the loan +was’ (the ‘salt tears’ shed by the gentlemen of +Norfolk proceeding, says expressly the Duke of Norfolk, +‘only from doubt how to find money to content the +King’s Highness’); yet the King and Wolsey gave way +frankly and at once, and the contribution was remitted, although +the Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, writing to Wolsey, treat the +insurrection lightly, and seem to object to the remission as +needless.</p> +<p>From all which facts—they are Mr. Hallam’s, not +Mr. Froude’s—we can deduce not tyranny, but lenity, +good sense, and the frank withdrawal from a wrong position as +soon as the unwillingness of the people proved it to be a wrong +one.</p> +<p>This instance is well brought forward (though only in a line +or two, by Mr. Froude) as one among many proofs that the working +classes in Henry the Eighth’s time ‘enjoyed an +abundance far beyond that which in general falls to the lot of +that order in long-settled countries, incomparably beyond what +the same class were enjoying at that very time in Germany or +France. The laws secured them; and that the laws were put +in force, we have the direct evidence of successive acts of the +Legislature, justifying the general policy by its success: and we +have also the indirect evidence of the contented loyalty of the +great body of the people, at a time when, if they had been +discontented, they held in their own hands the means of asserting +what the law acknowledged to be their right. ‘The +Government,’ as we have just shown at length, ‘had no +power to compel injustice . . . If the peasantry had been +suffering under any real grievances we should have heard of them +when the religious rebellions furnished so fair an opportunity to +press them forward. Complaint was loud enough, when +complaint was just, under the Somerset Protectorate.’</p> +<p>Such broad facts as these—for facts they are—ought +to make us pause ere we boast of the greater liberty enjoyed by +Englishmen of the present day, as compared with the tyranny of +Tudor times. Thank God, there is no lack of that blessing +now: but was there any real lack of it then? Certainly the +outward notes of a tyranny exist now in far greater completeness +than then. A standing army, a Government police, ministries +who bear no love to a militia, and would consider the compulsory +arming and drilling of the people as a dangerous insanity, do not +look at first sight as much like ‘free institutions’ +as a Government which, though again and again in danger not +merely of rebellion, but of internecine wars of succession, so +trusted the people as to force weapons into their hands from +boyhood. Let us not be mistaken: we are no hankerers after +retrogression: the present system works very well; let it be; all +that we say is that the imputation of despotic institutions lies, +<i>primâ facie</i>, rather against the reign of Queen +Victoria than against that of King Henry the Eighth. Of +course it is not so in fact. Many modern methods, which are +despotic in appearance, are not so in practice. Let us +believe that the same was the case in the sixteenth +century. Our governors now understand their own business +best, and make a very fair compromise between discipline and +freedom. Let us believe that the men of the sixteenth +century did so likewise. All we ask is that our forefathers +should be judged as we wish to be judged ourselves, ‘not +according to outward appearance, but with righteous +judgment.’</p> +<p>Mr. Froude finds the cause of this general contentment and +loyalty of the masses in the extreme care which the Government +took of their well-being. The introductory chapter, in +which he proves to his own satisfaction the correctness of his +opinion, is well worth the study of our political +economists. The facts which he brings seem certainly +overwhelming; of course, they can only be met by counter-facts; +and our knowledge does not enable us either to corroborate or +refute his statements. The chief argument used against them +seems to us, at least, to show that for some cause or other the +working classes were prosperous enough. It is said the Acts +of Parliament regulating wages do not fix the minimum of wages, +but the maximum. They are not intended to defend the +employed against the employer, but the employer against the +employed, in a defective state of the labour market, when the +workmen, by the fewness of their numbers, were enabled to make +extravagant demands. Let this be the case—we do not +say that it is so—what is it but a token of prosperity +among the working classes? A labour market so thin that +workmen can demand their own price for their labour, till +Parliament is compelled to bring them to reason, is surely a time +of prosperity to the employed—a time of full work and high +wages; of full stomachs, inclined from very prosperity to +‘wax fat and kick.’ If, however, any learned +statistician should be able to advance, on the opposite side of +the question, enough to weaken some of Mr. Froude’s +conclusions, he must still, if he be a just man, do honour to the +noble morality of this most striking chapter, couched as it is in +as perfect English as we have ever had the delight of +reading. We shall leave, then, the battle of facts to be +fought out by statisticians, always asking Mr. Froude’s +readers to bear in mind that, though other facts may be true, yet +his facts are no less true likewise; and we shall quote at +length, both as a specimen of his manner and of his matter, the +last three pages of this introductory chapter, in which, after +speaking of the severity of the laws against vagrancy, and +showing how they were excused by the organisation which found +employment for every able-bodied man, he goes on to +say:—</p> +<blockquote><p>‘It was therefore the expressed conviction +of the English nation that it was better for a man not to live at +all than to live a profitless and worthless life. The +vagabond was a sore spot upon the commonwealth, to be healed by +wholesale discipline if the gangrene was not incurable; to be cut +away with the knife if the milder treatment of the cart-whip +failed to be of profit.</p> +<p>‘A measure so extreme in its severity was partly +dictated by policy. The state of the country was critical; +and the danger from questionable persons traversing it, +unexamined and uncontrolled, was greater than at ordinary +times. But in point of justice as well as of prudence it +harmonised with the iron temper of the age, and it answered well +for the government of a fierce and powerful people, in whose +hearts lay an intense hatred of rascality, and among whom no one +could have lapsed into evil courses except by deliberate +preference for them. The moral sinew of the English must +have been strong indeed when it admitted of such stringent +bracing; but, on the whole, they were ruled as they preferred to +be ruled; and if wisdom can be tested by success, the manner in +which they passed the great crisis of the Reformation is the best +justification of their princes. The era was great +throughout Europe. The Italians of the age of Michael +Angelo, the Spaniards who were the contemporaries of Cortez, the +Germans who shook off the Pope at the call of Luther, and the +splendid chivalry of Francis I. of France, were no common +men. But they were all brought face to face with the same +trials, and none met them as the English met them. The +English alone never lost their self-possession, and if they owed +something to fortune in their escape from anarchy, they owed more +to the strong hand and steady purpose of their rulers.</p> +<p>‘To conclude this chapter, then.</p> +<p>‘In the brief review of the system under which England +was governed, we have seen a state of things in which the +principles of political economy were, consciously or +unconsciously, contradicted; where an attempt, more or less +successful, was made to bring the production and distribution of +wealth under the moral rule of right or wrong; and where those +laws of supply and demand, which we are now taught to regard as +immutable ordinances of nature, were absorbed or superseded by a +higher code. It is necessary for me to repeat that I am not +holding up the sixteenth century as a model which the nineteenth +might safely follow. The population has become too large, +and employment too complicated and fluctuating, to admit of such +control; while, in default of control, the relapse upon +self-interest as the one motive principle is certain to ensue, +and, when it ensues, is absolute in its operations. But as, +even with us, these so-called ordinances of nature in time of war +consent to be suspended, and duty to his country becomes with +every good citizen a higher motive of action than the advantages +which he may gain in an enemy’s market; so it is not +uncheering to look back upon a time when the nation was in a +normal condition of militancy against social injustice—when +the Government was enabled, by happy circumstances, to pursue +into detail a single and serious aim at the +well-being—well-being in its widest sense—of all +members of the commonwealth. There were difficulties and +drawbacks at that time as well as this. Of Liberty, in the +modern sense of the word—of the supposed right of every man +“to do what he will with his own,” or with +himself—there was no idea. To the question, if ever +it was asked, “May I not do what I will with my own?” +there was the brief answer, “No man may do what is wrong, +either with what is his own or with what is +another’s.” Producers, too, who were not +permitted to drive down their workmen’s wages by +competition, could not sell their goods as cheaply as they might +have done, and the consumer paid for the law in an advance of +price; but the burden, though it fell heavily on the rich, +lightly touched the poor and the rich consented cheerfully to a +tax which ensured the loyalty of the people. The working +man of modern times has bought the extension of his liberty at +the price of his material comfort. The higher classes have +gained in wealth what they have lost in power. It is not +for the historian to balance advantages. His duty is with +the facts.’</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Our forefathers, then, were not free, if we attach to that +word the meaning which our Transatlantic brothers seem inclined +to give to it. They had not learnt to deify self-will, and +to claim for each member of the human race a right to the +indulgence of every eccentricity. They called themselves +free, and boasted of their freedom; but their conception of +liberty was that of all old nations, a freedom which not only +allowed of discipline, but which grew out of it. No people +had less wish to exalt the kingly power into that specious +tyranny, a paternal Government; the king was with them, and +always had been, both formally and really, subject to their +choice; bound by many oaths to many duties; the minister, not the +master of the people. But their whole conception of +political life was, nevertheless, shaped by their conception of +family life. Strict obedience, stern discipline, compulsory +education in practical duties, was the law of the latter; without +such training they thought their sons could never become in any +true sense men. And when they grew up, their civic life was +to be conducted on the same principles, for the very purpose of +enabling them to live as members of a free nation. If the +self-will of the individual was curbed, now and then, +needlessly—as it is the nature of all human methods to +caricature themselves at times—the purpose was, not to +weaken the man, but to strengthen him by strengthening the body +to which he belonged. The nation was to be free, +self-helping, self-containing, unconquerable; to that great +purpose the will, the fancy—even, if need be, the mortal +life of the individual, must give way. Men must be trained +at all costs in self-restraint, because only so could they become +heroes in the day of danger; in self-sacrifice for the common +good, because only so would they remain united, while foreign +nations and evil home influences were trying to tear them +asunder. In a word, their conception of life was as a +warfare; their organisation that of a regiment. It is a +question whether the conception of corporate life embodied in a +regiment or army be not, after all, the best working one for this +world. At least the problem of a perfect society, howsoever +beautiful on paper, will always issue in a compromise, more or +less perfect—let us hope more and more perfect as the +centuries roll on—between the strictness of military +discipline and the Irishman’s <i>laissez-faire</i> ideal, +wherein ‘every man should do that which was right in the +sight of his own eyes, and wrong too, if he liked.’ +At least, such had England been for centuries; under such a +system had she thriven; a fact which, duly considered, should +silence somewhat those gentlemen who, not being of a military +turn themselves, inform Europe so patriotically and so prudently +that ‘England is not a military nation.’</p> +<p>From this dogma we beg leave to differ utterly. Britain +is at this moment, in our eyes, the only military nation in +Europe. All other nations seem to us to have military +governments, but not to be military themselves. As proof of +the assertion, we appeal merely to the existence of our +militia. While other nations are employing conscription, we +have raised in twelve months a noble army, every soul of which +has volunteered as a free man; and yet, forsooth, we are not a +military nation! We are not ashamed to tell how, but the +other day, standing in the rear of those militia regiments, no +matter where, a flush of pride came over us at the sight of those +lads, but a few months since helpless and awkward country boors, +now full of sturdy intelligence, cheerful obedience, and the +manhood which can afford to be respectful to others, because it +respects itself, and knows that it is respected in turn. +True, they had not the lightness, the order, the practical ease, +the cunning self-helpfulness of the splendid German legionaries +who stood beside them, the breast of every other private +decorated with clasps and medals for service in the wars of seven +years since. As an invading body, perhaps, one would have +preferred the Germans; but only because experience had taught +them already what it would teach in twelve months to the +Berkshire or Cambridge ‘clod.’ There, to us, +was the true test of England’s military qualities; her +young men had come by tens of thousands, of their own free will, +to be made soldiers of by her country gentlemen, and treated by +them the while as men to be educated, not as things to be +compelled; not driven like sheep to the slaughter, to be +disciplined by men with whom they had no bond but the mere +official one of military obedience; and ‘What,’ we +ask ourselves, ‘does England lack to make her a second +Rome?’ Her people have physical strength, animal +courage, that self-dependence of freemen which enabled at +Inkerman the privates to fight on literally without officers, +every man for his own hand. She has inventive genius, +enormous wealth; and if, as is said, her soldiers lack at present +the self-helpfulness of the Zouave, it is ridiculous to suppose +that that quality could long be wanting in the men of a nation +which is at this moment the foremost in the work of emigration +and colonisation. If organising power and military system +be, as is said, lacking in high quarters, surely there must be +organising power enough somewhere in the greatest industrial +nation upon earth, ready to come forward when there is a real +demand for it; and whatever be the defects of our system, we are +surely not as far behind Prussia or France as Rome was behind the +Carthaginians and the Greeks whom she crushed. A few years +sufficed for them to learn all they needed from their enemies; +fewer still would suffice us to learn from our friends. Our +working classes are not, like those of America, in a state of +physical comfort too great to make it worth while for them to +leave their home occupations; and whether that be a good or an +evil, it at least ensures us, as our militia proves, an almost +inexhaustible supply of volunteers. What a new and awful +scene for the world’s drama, did such a nation as this once +set before itself, steadily and ruthlessly, as Rome did of old, +the idea of conquest. Even now, waging war as she has done, +as it were, ἐν +παρεργᾷ, thinking war too +unimportant a part of her work to employ on it her highest +intellects, her flag has advanced in the last fifty years over +more vast and richer tracts than that of any European nation upon +earth. What keeps her from the dream which lured to their +destruction Babylon, Macedonia, Rome?</p> +<p>This: that, thank God, she has a conscience still; that, +feeling intensely the sacredness of her own national life, she +has learned to look on that of other people’s as sacred +also; and since, in the fifteenth century, she finally repented +of that wild and unrighteous dream of conquering France, she has +discovered more and more that true military greatness lies in the +power of defence, and not of attack; not in waging war, but being +able to wage it; and has gone on her true mission of replenishing +the earth more peacefully, on the whole, and more humanely, than +did ever nation before her; conquering only when it was necessary +to put down the lawlessness of the savage few for the well-being +of the civilised many. This has been her idea; she may have +confused it and herself in Caffre or in Chinese wars; for who can +always be true to the light within him? But this has been +her idea; and therefore she stands and grows and thrives, a +virgin land for now eight hundred years.</p> +<p>But a fancy has come over us during the last blessed forty +years of unexampled peace, from which our ancestors of the +sixteenth century were kept by stern and yet most wholesome +lessons; the fancy that peace, and not war, is the normal +condition of the world. The fancy is so fair that we blame +none who cherish it; after all they do good by cherishing it; +they point us to an ideal which we should otherwise forget, as +Babylon, Rome, France in the seventeenth century, forgot +utterly. Only they are in haste (and pardonable haste too) +to realise that ideal, forgetting that to do so would be really +to stop short of it, and to rest contented in some form of human +society far lower than that which God has actually prepared for +those who love Him. Better to believe that all our +conceptions of the height to which the human race might attain +are poor and paltry compared with that toward which God is +guiding it, and for which he is disciplining it by awful lessons: +and to fight on, if need be, ruthless, and yet full of +pity—and many a noble soul has learnt within the last two +years how easy it is to reconcile in practice that seeming +paradox of words—smiting down stoutly evil wheresoever we +shall find it, and saying, ‘What ought to be, we know not; +God alone can know: but that this ought not to be, we do know, +and here, in God’s name, it shall not stay.’</p> +<p>We repeat it: war, in some shape or other, is the normal +condition of the world. It is a fearful fact: but we shall +not abolish it by ignoring it, and ignoring by the same method +the teaching of our Bibles. Not in mere metaphor does the +gospel of Love describe the life of the individual good man as a +perpetual warfare. Not in mere metaphor does the apostle of +Love see in his visions of the world’s future no Arcadian +shepherd paradises, not even a perfect civilisation, but an +eternal war in heaven, wrath and woe, plague and earthquake; and +amid the everlasting storm, the voices of the saints beneath the +altar crying, ‘Lord, how long?’ Shall we +pretend to have more tender hearts than the old man of Ephesus, +whose dying sermon, so old legends say, was nought +but—‘Little children, love one another’; and +who yet could denounce the liar and the hater and the covetous +man, and proclaim the vengeance of God against all evildoers, +with all the fierceness of an Isaiah? It was enough for +him—let it be enough for us—that he should see, above +the thunder-cloud, and the rain of blood, and the scorpion swarm, +and the great angel calling all the fowl of heaven to the supper +of the great God, that they might eat the flesh of kings and +valiant men, a city of God eternal in the heavens, and yet +eternally descending among men; a perfect order, justice, love, +and peace, becoming actual more and more in every age, through +all the fearful training needful for a fallen race.</p> +<p>Let that be enough for us: but do not let us fancy that what +is true of the two extremes must not needs be true of the mean +also; that while the life of the individual and of the universe +is one of perpetual self-defence, the life of the nation can be +aught else: or that any appliances of scientific comforts, any +intellectual cultivation, even any of the most direct and +common-sense arguments of self-interest, can avail to quiet in +man those outbursts of wrath, ambition, cupidity, wounded pride, +which have periodically convulsed, and will convulse to the end, +the human race. The philosopher in his study may prove +their absurdity, their suicidal folly, till, deluded by the +strange lull of a forty years’ peace, he may look on wars +as in the same category with flagellantisms, witch-manias, and +other ‘popular delusions,’ as insanities of the past, +impossible henceforth; and may prophesy, as really wise political +economists were doing in 1847, that mankind had grown too +sensible to go to war any more. And behold, the peace +proves only to be the lull before the thunderstorm; and one +electric shock sets free forces unsuspected, transcendental, +supernatural in the deepest sense; forces which we can no more +stop, by shrieks at their absurdity, from incarnating themselves +in actual blood, and misery, and horror, than we can control the +madman in his paroxysm by telling him that he is a madman. +And so the fair vision of the student is buried once more in rack +and hail and driving storm; and, like Daniel of old when +rejoicing over the coming restoration of his people, he sees +beyond the victory some darker struggle still, and lets his notes +of triumph die away into a wail,—‘And the end thereof +shall be with a flood; and to the end of the war desolations are +determined.’</p> +<p>It is as impossible as it would be unwise to conceal from +ourselves the fact that all the Continental nations look upon our +present peace as but transitory, momentary; and on the Crimean +war as but the prologue to a fearful drama—all the more +fearful because none knows its purpose, its plot, which character +will be assumed by any given actor, and, least of all, the +<i>dénouement</i> of the whole. All that they feel +and know is that everything which has happened since 1848 has +exasperated, not calmed, the electric tension of the European +atmosphere; that a rottenness, rapidly growing intolerable alike +‘to God and the enemies of God,’ has eaten into the +vitals of Continental life; that their rulers know neither where +they are nor whither they are going, and only pray that things +may last out their time: all notes which one would interpret as +proving the Continent to be already ripe for subjection to some +one devouring race of conquerors, were there not a ray of hope in +an expectation, even more painful to our human pity, which is +held by some of the wisest among the Germans; namely, that the +coming war will fast resolve into no struggle between bankrupt +monarchs and their respective armies, but a war between nations +themselves, an internecine war of opinions and of creeds. +There are wise Germans now who prophesy, with sacred tears, a +second ‘Thirty Years’ War,’ with all its +frantic horrors, for their hapless country, which has found two +centuries too short a time wherein to recover from the exhaustion +of that first fearful scourge. Let us trust, if that war +shall beget its new Tillys and Wallensteins, it shall also beget +its new Gustavus Adolphus, and many another child of Light: but +let us not hope that we can stand by in idle comfort, and that +when the overflowing scourge passes by it shall not reach to +us. Shame to us, were that our destiny! Shame to us, +were we to refuse our share in the struggles of the human race, +and to stand by in idle comfort while the Lord’s battles +are being fought. Honour to us, if in that day we have +chosen for our leaders, as our forefathers of the sixteenth +century did, men who see the work which God would have them do, +and have hearts and heads to do it. Honour to us, if we +spend this transient lull, as our forefathers of the sixteenth +century did, in setting our house in order, in redressing every +grievance, reforming every abuse, knitting the hearts of the +British nation together by practical care and help between class +and class, man and man, governor and governed, that we may +bequeath to our children, as Henry the Eighth’s men did to +theirs, a British national life, so united and whole-hearted, so +clear in purpose and sturdy in execution, so trained to know the +right side at the first glance and take it, that they shall look +back with love and honour upon us, their fathers, determined to +carry out, even to the death, the method which we have bequeathed +to them. Then, if God will that the powers of evil, +physical and spiritual, should combine against this land, as they +did in the days of good Queen Bess, we shall not have lived in +vain; for those who, as in Queen Bess’s days, thought to +yoke for their own use a labouring ox, will find, as then, that +they have roused a lion from his den.</p> +<h2>FOOTNOTES</h2> +<p><a name="footnote219"></a><a href="#citation219" +class="footnote">[219]</a> North British Review, No. +LI., November 1856.—‘A History of England, from the +Fall of Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth.’ By J. A. +Froude, M.A., late Fellow of Exeter college, Oxford. +London: J. W. Parker and Son, West Strand. 2 vols. +1856.</p> +<p><a name="footnote246"></a><a href="#citation246" +class="footnote">[246]</a> This article appeared in the +<i>North British Review</i>.</p> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FROUDE'S HISTORY OF ENGLAND***</p> +<pre> + + +***** This file should be named 3144-h.htm or 3144-h.zip****** + + +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/1/4/3144 + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will +be renamed. + +Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright +law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, +so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United +States without permission and without paying copyright +royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part +of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, +and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive +specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this +eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook +for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, +performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given +away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks +not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the +trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. + +START: FULL LICENSE + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at +www.gutenberg.org/license. + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or +destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your +possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a +Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound +by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the +person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph +1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this +agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the +Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection +of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual +works in the collection are in the public domain in the United +States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the +United States and you are located in the United States, we do not +claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, +displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as +all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope +that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting +free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm +works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the +Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily +comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the +same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when +you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are +in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, +check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this +agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, +distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any +other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no +representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any +country outside the United States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other +immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear +prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work +on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, +performed, viewed, copied or distributed: + + This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and + most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no + restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it + under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this + eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the + United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you + are located before using this ebook. + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is +derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not +contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the +copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in +the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are +redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply +either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or +obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm +trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any +additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms +will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works +posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the +beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including +any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access +to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format +other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain +Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the +full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +provided that + +* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed + to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has + agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid + within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are + legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty + payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in + Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg + Literary Archive Foundation." + +* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all + copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue + all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm + works. + +* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of + any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of + receipt of the work. + +* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than +are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing +from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The +Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm +trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project +Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may +contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate +or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or +other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or +cannot be read by your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium +with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you +with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in +lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person +or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second +opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If +the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing +without further opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO +OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of +damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement +violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the +agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or +limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or +unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the +remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in +accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the +production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, +including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of +the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this +or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or +additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any +Defect you cause. + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of +computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It +exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations +from people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future +generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see +Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at +www.gutenberg.org + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by +U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the +mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its +volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous +locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt +Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to +date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and +official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +For additional contact information: + + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular +state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To +donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project +Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be +freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and +distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of +volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in +the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not +necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper +edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search +facility: www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +</pre></body> +</html> |