summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3140-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:20:34 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:20:34 -0700
commitf5c000f62ef6dd9cbe2e3660dae4ef94f1f1080f (patch)
treede0dabc99f518fbc21e757894d308d0b1c693693 /3140-0.txt
initial commit of ebook 3140HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to '3140-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--3140-0.txt5841
1 files changed, 5841 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3140-0.txt b/3140-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ade8714
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3140-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,5841 @@
+The Project Gutenberg eBook, Idle Ideas in 1905, by Jerome K. Jerome
+
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+
+
+
+Title: Idle Ideas in 1905
+
+
+Author: Jerome K. Jerome
+
+
+
+Release Date: April 21, 2013 [eBook #3140]
+[This file was first posted on December 30, 2000]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+
+***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IDLE IDEAS IN 1905***
+
+
+Transcribed from the 1905 Hurst and Blackett edition by David Price,
+email ccx074@pglaf.org
+
+
+
+
+
+ IDLE IDEAS
+ in 1905
+
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ BY
+
+ JEROME K. JEROME
+
+ AUTHOR OF
+
+ “Three Men in a Boat,”
+ “Idle Thoughts of an Idle Fellow,”
+ etc.
+
+ [Picture: Decorative graphic]
+
+ LONDON
+ HURST AND BLACKETT, LIMITED
+ 182, HIGH HOLBORN, W.C.
+
+ _All rights reserved_
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS.
+
+ CHAP. PAGE
+ I. ARE WE AS INTERESTING AS WE THINK WE ARE? 1
+ II. SHOULD WOMEN BE BEAUTIFUL? 16
+ III. WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO BE MERRY? 29
+ IV. DO WE LIE A-BED TOO LATE? 46
+ V. SHOULD MARRIED MEN PLAY GOLF? 60
+ VI. ARE EARLY MARRIAGES A MISTAKE? 74
+ VII. DO WRITERS WRITE TOO MUCH? 89
+ VIII. SHOULD SOLDIERS BE POLITE? 105
+ IX. OUGHT STORIES TO BE TRUE? 122
+ X. CREATURES THAT ONE DAY SHALL BE MEN 141
+ XI. HOW TO BE HAPPY THOUGH LITTLE 158
+ XII. SHOULD WE SAY WHAT WE THINK, OR THINK WHAT WE 173
+ SAY?
+ XIII. IS THE AMERICAN HUSBAND MADE ENTIRELY OF STAINED 186
+ GLASS
+ XIV. DOES THE YOUNG MAN KNOW EVERYTHING WORTH KNOWING? 199
+ XV. HOW MANY CHARMS HATH MUSIC, WOULD YOU SAY? 213
+ XVI. THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN! NEED IT BE SO HEAVY? 225
+ XVII. WHY DIDN’T HE MARRY THE GIRL? 238
+ XVIII. WHAT MRS. WILKINS THOUGHT ABOUT IT 251
+ XIX. SHALL WE BE RUINED BY CHINESE CHEAP LABOUR? 264
+ XX. HOW TO SOLVE THE SERVANT PROBLEM 278
+ XXI. WHY WE HATE THE FOREIGNER 292
+
+
+
+
+ARE WE AS INTERESTING AS WE THINK WE ARE?
+
+
+“CHARMED. Very hot weather we’ve been having of late—I mean cold. Let
+me see, I did not quite catch your name just now. Thank you so much.
+Yes, it is a bit close.” And a silence falls, neither of us being able
+to think what next to say.
+
+What has happened is this: My host has met me in the doorway, and shaken
+me heartily by the hand.
+
+“So glad you were able to come,” he has said. “Some friends of mine
+here, very anxious to meet you.” He has bustled me across the room.
+“Delightful people. You’ll like them—have read all your books.”
+
+He has brought me up to a stately lady, and has presented me. We have
+exchanged the customary commonplaces, and she, I feel, is waiting for me
+to say something clever, original and tactful. And I don’t know whether
+she is Presbyterian or Mormon; a Protectionist or a Free Trader; whether
+she is engaged to be married or has lately been divorced!
+
+A friend of mine adopts the sensible plan of always providing you with a
+short history of the person to whom he is about to lead you.
+
+“I want to introduce you to a Mrs. Jones,” he whispers. “Clever woman.
+Wrote a book two years ago. Forget the name of it. Something about
+twins. Keep away from sausages. Father ran a pork shop in the Borough.
+Husband on the Stock Exchange. Keep off coke. Unpleasantness about a
+company. You’ll get on best by sticking to the book. Lot in it about
+platonic friendship. Don’t seem to be looking too closely at her. Has a
+slight squint she tries to hide.”
+
+By this time we have reached the lady, and he introduces me as a friend
+of his who is simply dying to know her.
+
+“Wants to talk about your book,” he explains. “Disagrees with you
+entirely on the subject of platonic friendship. Sure you’ll be able to
+convince him.”
+
+It saves us both a deal of trouble. I start at once on platonic
+friendship, and ask her questions about twins, avoiding sausages and
+coke. She thinks me an unusually interesting man, and I am less bored
+than otherwise I might be.
+
+I have sometimes thought it would be a serviceable device if, in Society,
+we all of us wore a neat card—pinned, say, upon our back—setting forth
+such information as was necessary; our name legibly written, and how to
+be pronounced; our age (not necessarily in good faith, but for purposes
+of conversation. Once I seriously hurt a German lady by demanding of her
+information about the Franco-German war. She looked to me as if she
+could not object to being taken for forty. It turned out she was
+thirty-seven. Had I not been an Englishman I might have had to fight a
+duel); our religious and political beliefs; together with a list of the
+subjects we were most at home upon; and a few facts concerning our
+career—sufficient to save the stranger from, what is vulgarly termed
+“putting his foot in it.” Before making jokes about “Dumping,” or
+discussing the question of Chinese Cheap Labour, one would glance behind
+and note whether one’s companion was ticketed “Whole-hogger,” or
+“Pro-Boer.” Guests desirous of agreeable partners—an “agreeable person,”
+according to the late Lord Beaconsfield’s definition, being “a person who
+agrees with you”—could make their own selection.
+
+“Excuse me. Would you mind turning round a minute? Ah, ‘Wagnerian
+Crank!’ I am afraid we should not get on together. I prefer the Italian
+school.”
+
+Or, “How delightful. I see you don’t believe in vaccination. May I take
+you into supper?”
+
+Those, on the other hand, fond of argument would choose a suitable
+opponent. A master of ceremonies might be provided who would stand in
+the centre of the room and call for partners: “Lady with strong views in
+favour of female franchise wishes to meet gentleman holding the opinions
+of St. Paul. With view to argument.”
+
+An American lady, a year or two ago, wrote me a letter that did me real
+good: she appreciated my work with so much understanding, criticised it
+with such sympathetic interest. She added that, when in England the
+summer before, she had been on the point of accepting an invitation to
+meet me; but at the last moment she had changed her mind; she felt so
+sure—she put it pleasantly, but this is what it came to—that in my own
+proper person I should fall short of her expectations. For my own sake I
+felt sorry she had cried off; it would have been worth something to have
+met so sensible a woman. An author introduced to people who have read—or
+who say that they have read—his books, feels always like a man taken for
+the first time to be shown to his future wife’s relations. They are very
+pleasant. They try to put him at his ease. But he knows instinctively
+they are disappointed with him. I remember, when a very young man,
+attending a party at which a famous American humorist was the chief
+guest. I was standing close behind a lady who was talking to her
+husband.
+
+“He doesn’t look a bit funny,” said the lady.
+
+“Great Scott!” answered her husband. “How did you expect him to look?
+Did you think he would have a red nose and a patch over one eye?”
+
+“Oh, well, he might look funnier than that, anyhow,” retorted the lady,
+highly dissatisfied. “It isn’t worth coming for.”
+
+We all know the story of the hostess who, leaning across the table during
+the dessert, requested of the funny man that he would kindly say
+something amusing soon, because the dear children were waiting to go to
+bed. Children, I suppose, have no use for funny people who don’t choose
+to be funny. I once invited a friend down to my house for a Saturday to
+Monday. He is an entertaining man, and before he came I dilated on his
+powers of humour—somewhat foolishly perhaps—in the presence of a certain
+youthful person who resides with me, and who listens when she oughtn’t
+to, and never when she ought. He happened not to be in a humorous mood
+that evening. My young relation, after dinner, climbed upon my knee.
+For quite five minutes she sat silent. Then she whispered:
+
+“Has he said anything funny?”
+
+“Hush. No, not yet; don’t be silly.”
+
+Five minutes later: “Was that funny?”
+
+“No, of course not.”
+
+“Why not?”
+
+“Because—can’t you hear? We are talking about Old Age Pensions.”
+
+“What’s that?”
+
+“Oh, it’s—oh, never mind now. It isn’t a subject on which one can be
+funny.”
+
+“Then what’s he want to talk about it for?”
+
+She waited for another quarter of an hour. Then, evidently bored, and
+much to my relief, suggested herself that she might as well go to bed.
+She ran to me the next morning in the garden with an air of triumph.
+
+“He said something so funny last night,” she told me.
+
+“Oh, what was it?” I inquired. It seemed to me I must have missed it.
+
+“Well, I can’t exactly ’member it,” she explained, “not just at the
+moment. But it was so funny. I dreamed it, you know.”
+
+For folks not Lions, but closely related to Lions, introductions must be
+trying ordeals. You tell them that for years you have been yearning to
+meet them. You assure them, in a voice trembling with emotion, that this
+is indeed a privilege. You go on to add that when a boy—
+
+At this point they have to interrupt you to explain that they are not the
+Mr. So-and-So, but only his cousin or his grandfather; and all you can
+think of to say is: “Oh, I’m so sorry.”
+
+I had a nephew who was once the amateur long-distance bicycle champion.
+I have him still, but he is stouter and has come down to a motor car. In
+sporting circles I was always introduced as “Shorland’s Uncle.”
+Close-cropped young men would gaze at me with rapture; and then inquire:
+“And do you do anything yourself, Mr. Jerome?”
+
+But my case was not so bad as that of a friend of mine, a doctor. He
+married a leading actress, and was known ever afterwards as “Miss B—’s
+husband.”
+
+At public dinners, where one takes one’s seat for the evening next to
+someone that one possibly has never met before, and is never likely to
+meet again, conversation is difficult and dangerous. I remember talking
+to a lady at a Vagabond Club dinner. She asked me during the
+_entree_—with a light laugh, as I afterwards recalled—what I thought,
+candidly, of the last book of a certain celebrated authoress. I told
+her, and a coldness sprang up between us. She happened to be the certain
+celebrated authoress; she had changed her place at the last moment so as
+to avoid sitting next to another lady novelist, whom she hated.
+
+One has to shift oneself, sometimes, on these occasions. A newspaper man
+came up to me last Ninth of November at the Mansion House.
+
+“Would you mind changing seats with me?” he asked. “It’s a bit awkward.
+They’ve put me next to my first wife.”
+
+I had a troubled evening myself once long ago. I accompanied a young
+widow lady to a musical At Home, given by a lady who had more
+acquaintances than she knew. We met the butler at the top of the stairs.
+My friend spoke first:
+
+“Say Mrs. Dash and—”
+
+The butler did not wait for more—he was a youngish man—but shouted out:
+
+“Mr. and Mrs. Dash.”
+
+“My dear! how very quiet you have kept!” cried our hostess delighted.
+“Do let me congratulate you.”
+
+The crush was too great and our hostess too distracted at the moment for
+any explanations. We were swept away, and both of us spent the remainder
+of the evening feebly protesting our singleness.
+
+If it had happened on the stage it would have taken us the whole play to
+get out of it. Stage people are not allowed to put things right when
+mistakes are made with their identity. If the light comedian is
+expecting a plumber, the first man that comes into the drawing-room has
+got to be a plumber. He is not allowed to point out that he never was a
+plumber; that he doesn’t look like a plumber; that no one not an idiot
+would mistake him for a plumber. He has got to be shut up in the
+bath-room and have water poured over him, just as if he were a plumber—a
+stage plumber, that is. Not till right away at the end of the last act
+is he permitted to remark that he happens to be the new curate.
+
+I sat out a play once at which most people laughed. It made me sad. A
+dear old lady entered towards the end of the first act. We knew she was
+the aunt. Nobody can possibly mistake the stage aunt—except the people
+on the stage. They, of course, mistook her for a circus rider, and shut
+her up in a cupboard. It is what cupboards seem to be reserved for on
+the stage. Nothing is ever put in them excepting the hero’s relations.
+When she wasn’t in the cupboard she was in a clothes basket, or tied up
+in a curtain. All she need have done was to hold on to something while
+remarking to the hero:
+
+“If you’ll stop shouting and jumping about for just ten seconds, and give
+me a chance to observe that I am your maiden aunt from Devonshire, all
+this tomfoolery can be avoided.”
+
+That would have ended it. As a matter of fact that did end it five
+minutes past eleven. It hadn’t occurred to her to say it before.
+
+In real life I never knew but of one case where a man suffered in silence
+unpleasantness he could have ended with a word; and that was the case of
+the late Corney Grain. He had been engaged to give his entertainment at
+a country house. The lady was a _nouvelle riche_ of snobbish instincts.
+She left instructions that Corney Grain when he arrived was to dine with
+the servants. The butler, who knew better, apologised; but Corney was a
+man not easily disconcerted. He dined well, and after dinner rose and
+addressed the assembled company.
+
+“Well, now, my good friends,” said Corney, “if we have all finished, and
+if you are all agreeable, I shall be pleased to present to you my little
+show.”
+
+The servants cheered. The piano was dispensed with. Corney contrived to
+amuse his audience very well for half-an-hour without it. At ten o’clock
+came down a message: Would Mr. Corney Grain come up into the
+drawing-room. Corney went. The company in the drawing-room were
+waiting, seated.
+
+“We are ready, Mr. Grain,” remarked the hostess.
+
+“Ready for what?” demanded Corney.
+
+“For your entertainment,” answered the hostess.
+
+“But I have given it already,” explained Corney; “and my engagement was
+for one performance only.”
+
+“Given it! Where? When?”
+
+“An hour ago, downstairs.”
+
+“But this is nonsense,” exclaimed the hostess.
+
+“It seemed to me somewhat unusual,” Corney replied; “but it has always
+been my privilege to dine with the company I am asked to entertain. I
+took it you had arranged a little treat for the servants.”
+
+And Corney left to catch his train.
+
+Another entertainer told me the following story, although a joke against
+himself. He and Corney Grain were sharing a cottage on the river. A man
+called early one morning to discuss affairs, and was talking to Corney in
+the parlour, which was on the ground floor. The window was open. The
+other entertainer—the man who told me the story—was dressing in the room
+above. Thinking he recognised the voice of the visitor below, he leant
+out of his bedroom window to hear better. He leant too far, and dived
+head foremost into a bed of flowers, his bare legs—and only his bare
+legs—showing through the open window of the parlour.
+
+“Good gracious!” exclaimed the visitor, turning at the moment and seeing
+a pair of wriggling legs above the window sill; “who’s that?”
+
+Corney fixed his eyeglass and strolled to the window.
+
+“Oh, it’s only What’s-his-name,” he explained. “Wonderful spirits. Can
+be funny in the morning.”
+
+
+
+
+SHOULD WOMEN BE BEAUTIFUL?
+
+
+PRETTY women are going to have a hard time of it later on. Hitherto,
+they have had things far too much their own way. In the future there are
+going to be no pretty girls, for the simple reason there will be no plain
+girls against which to contrast them. Of late I have done some
+systematic reading of ladies’ papers. The plain girl submits to a course
+of “treatment.” In eighteen months she bursts upon Society an
+acknowledged beauty. And it is all done by kindness. One girl writes:
+
+“Only a little while ago I used to look at myself in the glass and cry.
+Now I look at myself and laugh.”
+
+The letter is accompanied by two photographs of the young lady. I should
+have cried myself had I seen her as she was at first. She was a stumpy,
+flat-headed, squat-nosed, cross-eyed thing. She did not even look good.
+One virtue she appears to have had, however. It was faith. She believed
+what the label said, she did what the label told her. She is now a tall,
+ravishing young person, her only trouble being, I should say, to know
+what to do with her hair—it reaches to her knees and must be a nuisance
+to her. She would do better to give some of it away. Taking this young
+lady as a text, it means that the girl who declines to be a dream of
+loveliness does so out of obstinacy. What the raw material may be does
+not appear to matter. Provided no feature is absolutely missing, the
+result is one and the same.
+
+Arrived at years of discretion, the maiden proceeds to choose the style
+of beauty she prefers. Will she be a Juno, a Venus, or a Helen? Will
+she have a Grecian nose, or one tip-tilted like the petal of a rose? Let
+her try the tip-tilted style first. The professor has an idea it is
+going to be fashionable. If afterwards she does not like it, there will
+be time to try the Grecian. It is difficult to decide these points
+without experiment.
+
+Would the lady like a high or a low forehead? Some ladies like to look
+intelligent. It is purely a matter of taste. With the Grecian nose, the
+low broad forehead perhaps goes better. It is more according to
+precedent. On the other hand, the high brainy forehead would be more
+original. It is for the lady herself to select.
+
+We come to the question of eyes. The lady fancies a delicate blue, not
+too pronounced a colour—one of those useful shades that go with almost
+everything. At the same time there should be depth and passion. The
+professor understands exactly the sort of eye the lady means. But it
+will be expensive. There is a cheap quality; the professor does not
+recommend it. True that it passes muster by gaslight, but the sunlight
+shows it up. It lacks tenderness, and at the price you can hardly expect
+it to contain much hidden meaning. The professor advises the melting,
+Oh-George-take-me-in-your-arms-and-still-my-foolish-fears brand. It
+costs a little more, but it pays for itself in the end.
+
+Perhaps it will be best, now the eye has been fixed upon, to discuss the
+question of the hair. The professor opens his book of patterns. Maybe
+the lady is of a wilful disposition. She loves to run laughing through
+the woods during exceptionally rainy weather; or to gallop across the
+downs without a hat, her fair ringlets streaming in the wind, the old
+family coachman panting and expostulating in the rear. If one may trust
+the popular novel, extremely satisfactory husbands have often been
+secured in this way. You naturally look at a girl who is walking through
+a wood, laughing heartily apparently for no other reason than because it
+is raining—who rides at stretch gallop without a hat. If you have
+nothing else to do, you follow her. It is always on the cards that such
+a girl may do something really amusing before she gets home. Thus things
+begin.
+
+To a girl of this kind, naturally curly hair is essential. It must be
+the sort of hair that looks better when it is soaking wet. The bottle of
+stuff that makes this particular hair to grow may be considered dear, if
+you think merely of the price. But that is not the way to look at it.
+“What is it going to do for me?” That is what the girl has got to ask
+herself. It does not do to spoil the ship for a ha’porth of tar, as the
+saying is. If you are going to be a dashing, wilful beauty, you must
+have the hair for it, or the whole scheme falls to the ground.
+
+Eyebrows and eyelashes, the professor assumes, the lady would like to
+match the hair. Too much eccentricity the professor does not agree with.
+Nature, after all, is the best guide; neatness combined with taste, that
+is the ideal to be aimed at. The eyebrows should be almost straight, the
+professor thinks; the eyelashes long and silky, with just the suspicion
+of a curl. The professor would also suggest a little less cheekbone.
+Cheekbones are being worn low this season.
+
+Will the lady have a dimpled chin, or does she fancy the square-cut jaw?
+Maybe the square-cut jaw and the firm, sweet mouth are more suitable for
+the married woman. They go well enough with the baby and the tea-urn,
+and the strong, proud man in the background. For the unmarried girl the
+dimpled chin and the rosebud mouth are, perhaps, on the whole safer.
+Some gentlemen are so nervous of that firm, square jaw. For the present,
+at all events, let us keep to the rosebud and the dimple.
+
+Complexion! Well, there is only one complexion worth considering—a
+creamy white, relieved by delicate peach pink. It goes with everything,
+and is always effective. Rich olives, striking pallors—yes, you hear of
+these things doing well. The professor’s experience, however, is that
+for all-round work you will never improve upon the plain white and pink.
+It is less liable to get out of order, and is the easiest at all times to
+renew.
+
+For the figure, the professor recommends something lithe and supple.
+Five foot four is a good height, but that is a point that should be
+discussed first with the dressmaker. For trains, five foot six is,
+perhaps, preferable. But for the sporting girl, who has to wear short
+frocks, that height would, of course, be impossible.
+
+The bust and the waist are also points on which the dressmaker should be
+consulted. Nothing should be done in a hurry. What is the fashion going
+to be for the next two or three seasons? There are styles demanding that
+beginning at the neck you should curve out, like a pouter pigeon. There
+is apparently no difficulty whatever in obtaining this result. But if
+crinolines, for instance, are likely to come in again! The lady has only
+to imagine it for herself: the effect might be grotesque, suggestive of a
+walking hour-glass. So, too, with the waist. For some fashions it is
+better to have it just a foot from the neck. At other times it is more
+useful lower down. The lady will kindly think over these details and let
+the professor know. While one is about it, one may as well make a sound
+job.
+
+It is all so simple, and, when you come to think of it, really not
+expensive. Age, apparently, makes no difference. A woman is as old as
+she looks. In future, I take it, there will be no ladies over
+five-and-twenty. Wrinkles! Why any lady should still persist in wearing
+them is a mystery to me. With a moderate amount of care any middle-class
+woman could save enough out of the housekeeping money in a month to get
+rid of every one of them. Grey hair! Well, of course, if you cling to
+grey hair, there is no more to be said. But to ladies who would just as
+soon have rich wavy-brown or a delicate shade of gold, I would point out
+that there are one hundred and forty-seven inexpensive lotions on the
+market, any one of which, rubbed gently into the head with a tooth-brush
+(not too hard) just before going to bed will, to use a colloquialism, do
+the trick.
+
+Are you too stout, or are you too thin? All you have to do is to say
+which, and enclose stamps. But do not make a mistake and send for the
+wrong recipe. If you are already too thin, you might in consequence
+suddenly disappear before you found out your mistake. One very stout
+lady I knew worked at herself for eighteen months and got stouter every
+day. This discouraged her so much that she gave up trying. No doubt she
+had made a muddle and had sent for the wrong bottle, but she would not
+listen to further advice. She said she was tired of the whole thing.
+
+In future years there will be no need for a young man to look about him
+for a wife; he will take the nearest girl, tell her his ideal, and, if
+she really care for him, she will go to the shop and have herself fixed
+up to his pattern. In certain Eastern countries, I believe, something of
+this kind is done. A gentleman desirous of adding to his family sends
+round the neighbourhood the weight and size of his favourite wife,
+hinting that if another can be found of the same proportions, there is
+room for her. Fathers walk round among their daughters, choose the most
+likely specimen, and have her fattened up. That is their brutal Eastern
+way. Out West we shall be more delicate. Match-making mothers will
+probably revive the old confession book. Eligible bachelors will be
+invited to fill in a page: “Your favourite height in women,” “Your
+favourite measurement round the waist,” “Do you like brunettes or
+blondes?”
+
+The choice will be left to the girls.
+
+“I do think Henry William just too sweet for words,” the maiden of the
+future will murmur to herself. Gently, coyly, she will draw from him his
+ideal of what a woman should be. In from six months to a year she will
+burst upon him, the perfect She; height, size, weight, right to a T. He
+will clasp her in his arms.
+
+“At last,” he will cry, “I have found her, the woman of my dreams.”
+
+And if he does not change his mind, and the bottles do not begin to lose
+their effect, there will be every chance that they will be happy ever
+afterwards.
+
+Might not Science go even further? Why rest satisfied with making a
+world of merely beautiful women? Cannot Science, while she is about it,
+make them all good at the same time. I do not apologise for the
+suggestion. I used to think all women beautiful and good. It is their
+own papers that have disillusioned me. I used to look at this lady or at
+that—shyly, when nobody seemed to be noticing me—and think how fair she
+was, how stately. Now I only wonder who is her chemist.
+
+They used to tell me, when I was a little boy, that girls were made of
+sugar and spice. I know better now. I have read the recipes in the
+Answers to Correspondents.
+
+When I was quite a young man I used to sit in dark corners and listen,
+with swelling heart, while people at the piano told me where little girl
+babies got their wonderful eyes from, of the things they did to them in
+heaven that gave them dimples. Ah me! I wish now I had never come
+across those ladies’ papers. I know the stuff that causes those
+bewitching eyes. I know the shop where they make those dimples; I have
+passed it and looked in. I thought they were produced by angels’ kisses,
+but there was not an angel about the place, that I could see. Perhaps I
+have also been deceived as regards their goodness. Maybe all women are
+not so perfect as in the popular short story they appear to be. That is
+why I suggest that Science should proceed still further, and make them
+all as beautiful in mind as she is now able to make them in body. May we
+not live to see in the advertisement columns of the ladies’ paper of the
+future the portrait of a young girl sulking in a corner—“Before taking
+the lotion!” The same girl dancing among her little brothers and
+sisters, shedding sunlight through the home—“After the three first
+bottles!” May we not have the Caudle Mixture: One tablespoonful at
+bed-time guaranteed to make the lady murmur, “Good-night, dear; hope
+you’ll sleep well,” and at once to fall asleep, her lips parted in a
+smile? Maybe some specialist of the future will advertise Mind Massage:
+“Warranted to remove from the most obstinate subject all traces of
+hatred, envy, and malice.”
+
+And, when Science has done everything possible for women, there might be
+no harm in her turning her attention to us men. Her idea at present
+seems to be that we men are too beautiful, physically and morally, to
+need improvement. Personally, there are one or two points about which I
+should like to consult her.
+
+
+
+
+WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO BE MERRY?
+
+
+THERE is so much I could do to improve things generally in and about
+Europe, if only I had a free hand. I should not propose any great
+fundamental changes. These poor people have got used to their own ways;
+it would be unwise to reform them all at once. But there are many little
+odds and ends that I could do for them, so many of their mistakes I could
+correct for them. They do not know this. If they only knew there was a
+man living in their midst willing to take them in hand and arrange things
+for them, how glad they would be. But the story is always the same. One
+reads it in the advertisements of the matrimonial column:
+
+“A lady, young, said to be good-looking”—she herself is not sure on the
+point; she feels that possibly she may be prejudiced; she puts before you
+merely the current gossip of the neighbourhood; people say she is
+beautiful; they may be right, they may be wrong: it is not for her to
+decide—“well-educated, of affectionate disposition, possessed of means,
+desires to meet gentleman with a view to matrimony.”
+
+Immediately underneath one reads of a gentleman of twenty-eight, “tall,
+fair, considered agreeable.” Really the modesty of the matrimonial
+advertiser teaches to us ordinary mortals quite a beautiful lesson. I
+know instinctively that were anybody to ask me suddenly:
+
+“Do you call yourself an agreeable man?” I should answer promptly:
+
+“An agreeable man! Of course I’m an agreeable man. What silly questions
+you do ask!” If he persisted in arguing the matter, saying:
+
+“But there are people who do not consider you an agreeable man.” I
+should get angry with him.
+
+“Oh, they think that, do they?” I should say. “Well, you tell them from
+me, with my compliments, that they are a set of blithering idiots. Not
+agreeable! You show me the man who says I’m not agreeable. I’ll soon
+let him know whether I’m agreeable or not.”
+
+These young men seeking a wife are silent on the subject of their own
+virtues. Such are for others to discover. The matrimonial advertiser
+confines himself to a simple statement of fact: “he is considered
+agreeable.” He is domestically inclined, and in receipt of a good
+income. He is desirous of meeting a lady of serious disposition, with
+view to matrimony. If possessed of means—well, it is a trifle hardly
+worth considering one way or the other. He does not insist upon it; on
+the other hand he does not exclude ladies of means; the main idea is
+matrimony.
+
+It is sad to reflect upon a young lady, said to be good-looking (let us
+say good-looking and be done with it: a neighbourhood does not rise up
+and declare a girl good-looking if she is not good-looking, that is only
+her modest way of putting it), let us say a young lady, good-looking,
+well-educated, of affectionate disposition—it is undeniably sad to
+reflect that such an one, matrimonially inclined, should be compelled to
+have recourse to the columns of a matrimonial journal. What are the
+young men in the neighbourhood thinking of? What more do they want? Is
+it Venus come to life again with ten thousand a year that they are
+waiting for! It makes me angry with my own sex reading these
+advertisements. And when one thinks of the girls that do get married!
+
+But life is a mystery. The fact remains: here is the ideal wife seeking
+in vain for a husband. And here, immediately underneath—I will not say
+the ideal husband, he may have faults; none of us are perfect, but as men
+go a decided acquisition to any domestic hearth, an agreeable gentleman,
+fond of home life, none of your gad-abouts—calls aloud to the four winds
+for a wife—any sort of a wife, provided she be of a serious disposition.
+In his despair, he has grown indifferent to all other considerations.
+“Is there in this world,” he has said to himself, “one unmarried woman,
+willing to marry me, an agreeable man, in receipt of a good income.”
+Possibly enough this twain have passed one another in the street, have
+sat side by side in the same tram-car, never guessing, each one, that the
+other was the very article of which they were in want to make life
+beautiful.
+
+Mistresses in search of a servant, not so much with the idea of getting
+work out of her, rather with the object of making her happy, advertise on
+one page. On the opposite page, domestic treasures—disciples of Carlyle,
+apparently, with a passionate love of work for its own sake—are seeking
+situations, not so much with the desire of gain as with the hope of
+finding openings where they may enjoy the luxury of feeling they are
+leading useful lives. These philanthropic mistresses, these toil-loving
+hand-maidens, have lived side by side in the same town for years, never
+knowing one another.
+
+So it is with these poor European peoples. They pass me in the street.
+They do not guess that I am ready and willing to take them under my care,
+to teach them common sense with a smattering of intelligence—to be, as
+one might say, a father to them. They look at me. There is nothing
+about me to tell them that I know what is good for them better than they
+do themselves. In the fairy tales the wise man wore a conical hat and a
+long robe with twiddly things all round the edge. You knew he was a
+clever man. It avoided the necessity of explanation. Unfortunately, the
+fashion has gone out. We wise men have to wear just ordinary clothes.
+Nobody knows we are wise men. Even when we tell them so, they don’t
+believe it. This it is that makes our task the more difficult.
+
+One of the first things I should take in hand, were European affairs
+handed over to my control, would be the rearrangement of the Carnival.
+As matters are, the Carnival takes place all over Europe in February. At
+Nice, in Spain, or in Italy, it may be occasionally possible to feel you
+want to dance about the streets in thin costume during February. But in
+more northern countries during Carnival time I have seen only one
+sensible masker; he was a man who had got himself up as a diver. It was
+in Antwerp. The rain was pouring down in torrents; a cheery, boisterous
+John Bull sort of an east wind was blustering through the streets at the
+rate of fifteen miles an hour. Pierrots, with frozen hands, were blowing
+blue noses. An elderly Cupid had borrowed an umbrella from a café and
+was waiting for a tram. A very little devil was crying with the cold,
+and wiping his eyes with the end of his own tail. Every doorway was
+crowded with shivering maskers. The diver alone walked erect, the water
+streaming from him.
+
+February is not the month for open air masquerading. The “confetti,”
+which has come to be nothing but coloured paper cut into small discs, is
+a sodden mass. When a lump of it strikes you in the eye, your instinct
+is not to laugh gaily, but to find out the man who threw it and to hit
+him back. This is not the true spirit of Carnival. The marvel is that,
+in spite of the almost invariably adverse weather, these Carnivals still
+continue. In Belgium, where Romanism still remains the dominant
+religion, Carnival maintains itself stronger than elsewhere in Northern
+Europe.
+
+At one small town, Binche, near the French border, it holds uninterrupted
+sway for three days and two nights, during which time the whole of the
+population, swelled by visitors from twenty miles round, shouts, romps,
+eats and drinks and dances. After which the visitors are packed like
+sardines into railway trains. They pin their tickets to their coats and
+promptly go to sleep. At every station the railway officials stumble up
+and down the trains with lanterns. The last feeble effort of the more
+wakeful reveller, before he adds himself to the heap of snoring humanity
+on the floor of the railway carriage, is to change the tickets of a
+couple of his unconscious companions. In this way gentlemen for the east
+are dragged out by the legs at junctions, and packed into trains going
+west; while southern fathers are shot out in the chill dawn at lonely
+northern stations, to find themselves greeted with enthusiasm by other
+people’s families.
+
+At Binche, they say—I have not counted them myself—that thirty thousand
+maskers can be seen dancing at the same time. When they are not dancing
+they are throwing oranges at one another. The houses board up their
+windows. The restaurants take down their mirrors and hide away the
+glasses. If I went masquerading at Binche I should go as a man in
+armour, period Henry the Seventh.
+
+“Doesn’t it hurt,” I asked a lady who had been there, “having oranges
+thrown at you? Which sort do they use, speaking generally, those fine
+juicy ones—Javas I think you call them—or the little hard brand with
+skins like a nutmeg-grater? And if both sorts are used indiscriminately,
+which do you personally prefer?”
+
+“The smart people,” she answered, “they are the same everywhere—they must
+be extravagant—they use the Java orange. If it hits you in the back I
+prefer the Java orange. It is more messy than the other, but it does not
+leave you with that curious sensation of having been temporarily stunned.
+Most people, of course, make use of the small hard orange. If you duck
+in time, and so catch it on the top of your head, it does not hurt so
+much as you would think. If, however, it hits you on a tender
+place—well, myself, I always find that a little sal volatile, with old
+cognac—half and half, you understand—is about the best thing. But it
+only happens once a year,” she added.
+
+Nearly every town gives prizes for the best group of maskers. In some
+cases the first prize amounts to as much as two hundred pounds. The
+butchers, the bakers, the candlestick makers, join together and compete.
+They arrive in wagons, each group with its band. Free trade is
+encouraged. Each neighbouring town and village “dumps” its load of
+picturesque merry-makers.
+
+It is in these smaller towns that the spirit of King Carnival finds
+happiest expression. Almost every third inhabitant takes part in the
+fun. In Brussels and the larger towns the thing appears ridiculous. A
+few hundred maskers force their way with difficulty through thousands of
+dull-clad spectators, looking like a Spanish river in the summer time, a
+feeble stream, dribbling through acres of muddy bank. At Charleroi, the
+centre of the Belgian Black Country, the chief feature of the Carnival is
+the dancing of the children. A space is specially roped off for them.
+
+If by chance the sun is kind enough to shine, the sight is a pretty one.
+How they love the dressing up and the acting, these small mites! One
+young hussy—she could hardly have been more than ten—was gotten up as a
+haughty young lady. Maybe some elder sister had served as a model. She
+wore a tremendous wig of flaxen hair, a hat that I guarantee would have
+made its mark even at Ascot on the Cup Day, a skirt that trailed two
+yards behind her, a pair of what had once been white kid gloves, and a
+blue silk parasol. Dignity! I have seen the offended barmaid, I have
+met the chorus girl—not by appointment, please don’t misunderstand me,
+merely as a spectator—up the river on Sunday. But never have I witnessed
+in any human being so much hauteur to the pound _avoir-dupois_ as was
+carried through the streets of Charleroi by that small brat. Companions
+of other days, mere vulgar boys and girls, claimed acquaintance with her.
+She passed them with a stare of such utter disdain that it sent them
+tumbling over one another backwards. By the time they had recovered
+themselves sufficiently to think of an old tin kettle lying handy in the
+gutter she had turned the corner.
+
+Two miserably clad urchins, unable to scrape together the few _sous_
+necessary for the hire of a rag or two, had nevertheless determined not
+to be altogether out of it. They had managed to borrow a couple of white
+blouses—not what you would understand by a white blouse, dear Madame, a
+dainty thing of frills and laces, but the coarse white sack the street
+sweeper wears over his clothes. They had also borrowed a couple of
+brooms. Ridiculous little objects they looked, the tiny head of each
+showing above the great white shroud as gravely they walked, the one
+behind the other, sweeping the mud into the gutter. They also were of
+the Carnival, playing at being scavengers.
+
+Another quaint sight I witnessed. The “serpentin” is a feature of the
+Belgian Carnival. It is a strip of coloured paper, some dozen yards
+long, perhaps. You fling it as you would a lassoo, entangling the head
+of some passer-by. Naturally, the object most aimed at by the Belgian
+youth is the Belgian maiden. And, naturally also, the maiden who finds
+herself most entangled is the maiden who—to use again the language of the
+matrimonial advertiser—“is considered good-looking.” The serpentin about
+her head is the “feather in her cap” of the Belgian maiden on Carnival
+Day. Coming suddenly round the corner I almost ran into a girl. Her
+back was towards me. It was a quiet street. She had half a dozen of
+these serpentins. Hurriedly, with trembling hands, she was twisting them
+round and round her own head. I looked at her as I passed. She flushed
+scarlet. Poor little snub-nosed pasty-faced woman! I wish she had not
+seen me. I could have bought sixpenny-worth, followed her, and tormented
+her with them; while she would have pretended indignation—sought,
+discreetly, to escape from me.
+
+Down South, where the blood flows quicker, King Carnival is, indeed, a
+jolly old soul. In Munich he reigns for six weeks, the end coming with a
+mad two days revel in the streets. During the whole of the period, folks
+in ordinary, every-day costume are regarded as curiosities; people wonder
+what they are up to. From the Grafin to the Dienstmädchen, from the Herr
+Professor to the “Piccolo,” as they term the small artist that answers to
+our page boy, the business of Munich is dancing, somewhere, somehow, in a
+fancy costume. Every theatre clears away the stage, every café crowds
+its chairs and tables into corners, the very streets are cleared for
+dancing. Munich goes mad.
+
+Munich is always a little mad. The maddest ball I ever danced at was in
+Munich. I went there with a Harvard University professor. He had been
+told what these balls were like. Ever seeking knowledge of all things,
+he determined to take the matter up for himself and examine it. The
+writer also must ever be learning. I agreed to accompany him. We had
+not intended to dance. Our idea was that we could be indulgent
+spectators, regarding from some coign of vantage the antics of the
+foolish crowd. The professor was clad as became a professor. Myself, I
+wore a simply-cut frock-coat, with trousering in French grey. The
+doorkeeper explained to us that this was a costume ball; he was sorry,
+but gentlemen could only be admitted in evening dress or in masquerade.
+
+It was half past one in the morning. We had sat up late on purpose; we
+had gone without our dinner; we had walked two miles. The professor
+suggested pinning up the tails of his clerically-cut coat and turning in
+his waistcoat. The doorkeeper feared it would not be quite the same
+thing. Besides, my French grey trousers refused to adapt themselves.
+The doorkeeper proposed our hiring a costume—a little speculation of his
+own; gentlemen found it simpler sometimes, especially married gentlemen,
+to hire a costume in this manner, changing back into sober garments
+before returning home. It reduced the volume of necessary explanation.
+
+“Have you anything, my good man,” said the professor, “anything that
+would effect a complete disguise?”
+
+The doorkeeper had the very thing—a Chinese arrangement, with combined
+mask and wig. It fitted neatly over the head, and was provided with a
+simple but ingenious piece of mechanism by means of which much could be
+done with the pigtail. Myself the doorkeeper hid from view under the
+cowl of a Carmelite monk.
+
+“I do hope nobody recognises us,” whispered my friend the professor as we
+entered.
+
+I can only hope sincerely that they did not. I do not wish to talk about
+myself. That would be egotism. But the mystery of the professor
+troubles me to this day. A grave, earnest gentleman, the father of a
+family, I saw him with my own eyes put that ridiculous pasteboard mask
+over his head. Later on—a good deal later on—I found myself walking
+again with him through silent star-lit streets. Where he had been in the
+interval, and who then was the strange creature under the Chinaman’s
+mask, will always remain to me an unsolved problem.
+
+
+
+
+DO WE LIE A-BED TOO LATE?
+
+
+IT was in Paris, many years ago, that I fell by chance into this habit of
+early rising. My night—by reasons that I need not enter into—had been a
+troubled one. Tired of the hot bed that gave no sleep, I rose and
+dressed myself, crept down the creaking stairs, experiencing the
+sensations of a burglar new to his profession, unbolted the great door of
+the hotel, and passed out into an unknown, silent city, bathed in a
+mysterious soft light. Since then, this strange sweet city of the dawn
+has never ceased to call to me. It may be in London, in Paris again, in
+Brussels, Berlin, Vienna, that I have gone to sleep, but if perchance I
+wake before the returning tide of human life has dimmed its glories with
+the mists and vapours of the noisy day, I know that beyond my window
+blind the fairy city, as I saw it first so many years ago—this city that
+knows no tears, no sorrow, through which there creeps no evil thing; this
+city of quiet vistas, fading into hope; this city of far-off voices
+whispering peace; this city of the dawn that still is young—invites me to
+talk with it awhile before the waking hours drive it before them, and
+with a sigh it passes whence it came.
+
+It is the great city’s one hour of purity, of dignity. The very
+rag-picker, groping with her filthy hands among the ashes, instead of an
+object of contempt, moves from door to door an accusing Figure, her thin
+soiled garments, her bent body, her scarred face, hideous with the wounds
+of poverty, an eloquent indictment of smug Injustice, sleeping behind its
+deaf shutters. Yet even into her dim brain has sunk the peace that fills
+for this brief hour the city. This, too, shall have its end, my sister!
+Men and women were not born to live on the husks that fill the pails
+outside the rich man’s door. Courage a little while longer, you and
+yours. Your rheumy eyes once were bright, your thin locks once soft and
+wavy, your poor bent back once straight; and maybe, as they tell you in
+their gilded churches, this bulging sack shall be lifted from your weary
+shoulders, your misshapen limbs be straight again. You pass not
+altogether unheeded through these empty streets. Not all the eyes of the
+universe are sleeping.
+
+The little seamstress, hurrying to her early work! A little later she
+will be one of the foolish crowd, joining in the foolish laughter, in the
+coarse jests of the work-room: but as yet the hot day has not claimed
+her. The work-room is far beyond, the home of mean cares and sordid
+struggles far behind. To her, also, in this moment are the sweet
+thoughts of womanhood. She puts down her bag, rests herself upon a seat.
+If all the day were dawn, this city of the morning always with us! A
+neighbouring clock chimes forth the hour. She starts up from her dream
+and hurries on—to the noisy work-room.
+
+A pair of lovers cross the park, holding each other’s hands. They will
+return later in the day, but there will be another expression in their
+eyes, another meaning in the pressure of their hands. Now the purity of
+the morning is with them.
+
+Some fat, middle-aged clerk comes puffing into view: his ridiculous
+little figure very podgy. He stops to take off his hat and mop his bald
+head with his handkerchief: even to him the morning lends romance. His
+fleshy face changes almost as one looks at him. One sees again the lad
+with his vague hopes, his absurd ambitions.
+
+There is a statue of Aphrodite in one of the smaller Paris parks. Twice
+in the same week, without particularly meaning it, I found myself early
+in the morning standing in front of this statue gazing listlessly at it,
+as one does when in dreamy mood; and on both occasions, turning to go, I
+encountered the same man, also gazing at it with, apparently, listless
+eyes. He was an uninteresting looking man—possibly he thought the same
+of me. From his dress he might have been a well-to-do tradesman, a minor
+Government official, doctor, or lawyer. Quite ten years later I paid my
+third visit to the same statue at about the same hour. This time he was
+there before me. I was hidden from him by some bushes. He glanced round
+but did not see me; and then he did a curious thing. Placing his hands
+on the top of the pedestal, which may have been some seven feet in
+height, he drew himself up, and kissed very gently, almost reverentially,
+the foot of the statue, begrimed though it was with the city’s dirt. Had
+he been some long-haired student of the Latin Quarter one would not have
+been so astonished. But he was such a very commonplace, quite
+respectable looking man. Afterwards he drew a pipe from his pocket,
+carefully filled and lighted it, took his umbrella from the seat where it
+had been lying, and walked away.
+
+Had it been their meeting-place long ago? Had he been wont to tell her,
+gazing at her with lover’s eyes, how like she was to the statue? The
+French sculptor has not to consider Mrs. Grundy. Maybe, the lady,
+raising her eyes, had been confused; perhaps for a moment angry—some
+little milliner or governess, one supposes. In France the _jeune fille_
+of good family does not meet her lover unattended. What had happened?
+Or was it but the vagrant fancy of a middle-aged bourgeois seeking in
+imagination the romance that reality so rarely gives us, weaving his love
+dream round his changeless statue?
+
+In one of Ibsen’s bitter comedies the lovers agree to part while they are
+still young, never to see each other in the flesh again. Into the future
+each will bear away the image of the other, godlike, radiant with the
+glory of youth and love; each will cherish the memory of a loved one who
+shall be beautiful always. That their parting may not appear such wild
+nonsense as at first it strikes us, Ibsen shows us other lovers who have
+married in the orthodox fashion. She was all that a mistress should be.
+They speak of her as they first knew her fifteen years ago, when every
+man was at her feet. He then was a young student, burning with fine
+ideals, with enthusiasm for all the humanities.
+
+They enter.
+
+What did you expect? Fifteen years have passed—fifteen years of struggle
+with the grim realities. He is fat and bald. Eleven children have to be
+provided for. High ideals will not even pay the bootmaker. To exist you
+have to fight for mean ends with mean weapons. And the sweet girl
+heroine! Now the worried mother of eleven brats! One rings down the
+curtain amid Satanic laughter.
+
+That is why, for one reason among so many, I love this mystic morning
+light. It has a strange power of revealing the beauty that is hidden
+from us by the coarser beams of the full day. These worn men and women,
+grown so foolish looking, so unromantic; these artisans and petty clerks
+plodding to their monotonous day’s work; these dull-eyed women of the
+people on their way to market to haggle over _sous_, to argue and contend
+over paltry handfuls of food. In this magic morning light the disguising
+body becomes transparent. They have grown beautiful, not ugly, with the
+years of toil and hardship; these lives, lived so patiently, are
+consecrated to the service of the world. Joy, hope, pleasure—they have
+done with all such, life for them is over. Yet they labour, ceaselessly,
+uncomplainingly. It is for the children.
+
+One morning, near Brussels, I encountered a cart of faggots, drawn by a
+hound so lean that stroking him might have hurt a dainty hand. I was
+shocked—angry, till I noticed his fellow beast of burden pushing the cart
+from behind. Such a scarecrow of an old woman! There was little to
+choose between them. I walked with them a little way. She lived near
+Waterloo. All day she gathered wood in the great forest, and starting at
+three o’clock each morning, the two lean creatures between them dragged
+the cart nine miles to Brussels, returning when they had sold their load.
+With luck she might reckon on a couple of francs. I asked her if she
+could not find something else to do.
+
+Yes, it was possible, but for the little one, her grandchild. Folks will
+not employ old women burdened with grandchildren.
+
+You fair, dainty ladies, who would never know it was morning if somebody
+did not enter to pull up the blind and tell you so! You do well not to
+venture out in this magic morning light. You would look so plain—almost
+ugly, by the side of these beautiful women.
+
+It is curious the attraction the Church has always possessed for the
+marketing classes. Christ drove them from the Temple, but still, in
+every continental city, they cluster round its outer walls. It makes a
+charming picture on a sunny morning, the great cathedral with its massive
+shadow forming the background; splashed about its feet, like a parterre
+of gay flowers around the trunk of some old tree, the women, young girls
+in their many coloured costumes, sitting before their piled-up baskets of
+green vegetables, of shining fruits.
+
+In Brussels the chief market is held on the Grande Place. The great
+gilded houses have looked down upon much the same scene every morning
+these four hundred years. In summer time it commences about half-past
+four; by five o’clock it is a roaring hive, the great city round about
+still sleeping.
+
+Here comes the thrifty housewife of the poor, to whom the difference of a
+tenth of a penny in the price of a cabbage is all-important, and the much
+harassed keeper of the petty _pension_. There are houses in Brussels
+where they will feed you, light you, sleep you, wait on you, for two
+francs a day. Withered old ladies, ancient governesses, who will teach
+you for forty centimes an hour, gather round these ricketty tables, wolf
+up the thin soup, grumble at the watery coffee, help themselves with
+unladylike greediness to the potato pie. It must need careful
+housewifery to keep these poor creatures on two francs a day and make a
+profit for yourself. So “Madame,” the much-grumbled-at, who has gone to
+bed about twelve, rises a little before five, makes her way down with her
+basket. Thus a few _sous_ may be saved upon the day’s economies.
+
+Sometimes it is a mere child who is the little housekeeper. One thinks
+that perhaps this early training in the art of haggling may not be good
+for her. Already there is a hard expression in the childish eyes, mean
+lines about the little mouth. The finer qualities of humanity are
+expensive luxuries, not to be afforded by the poor.
+
+They overwork their patient dogs, and underfeed them. During the two
+hours’ market the poor beasts, still fastened to their little “chariots,”
+rest in the open space about the neighbouring Bourse. They snatch at
+what you throw them; they do not even thank you with a wag of the tail.
+Gratitude! Politeness! What mean you? We have not heard of such. We
+only work. Some of them amid all the din lie sleeping between their
+shafts. Some are licking one another’s sores. One would they were
+better treated; alas! their owners, likewise, are overworked and
+underfed, housed in kennels no better. But if the majority in every
+society were not overworked and underfed and meanly housed, why, then the
+minority could not be underworked and overfed and housed luxuriously.
+But this is talk to which no respectable reader can be expected to
+listen.
+
+They are one babel of bargaining, these markets. The purchaser selects a
+cauliflower. Fortunately, cauliflowers have no feelings, or probably it
+would burst into tears at the expression with which it is regarded. It
+is impossible that any lady should desire such a cauliflower. Still, out
+of mere curiosity, she would know the price—that is, if the owner of the
+cauliflower is not too much ashamed of it to name a price.
+
+The owner of the cauliflower suggests six _sous_. The thing is too
+ridiculous for argument. The purchaser breaks into a laugh.
+
+The owner of the cauliflower is stung. She points out the beauties of
+that cauliflower. Apparently it is the cauliflower out of all her stock
+she loves the best; a better cauliflower never lived; if there were more
+cauliflowers in the world like this particular cauliflower things might
+be different. She gives a sketch of the cauliflower’s career, from its
+youth upwards. Hard enough it will be for her when the hour for parting
+from it comes. If the other lady has not sufficient knowledge of
+cauliflowers to appreciate it, will she kindly not paw it about, but put
+it down and go away, and never let the owner of the cauliflower see her
+again.
+
+The other lady, more as a friend than as a purchaser, points out the
+cauliflower’s defects. She wishes well to the owner of the cauliflower,
+and would like to teach her something about her business. A lady who
+thinks such a cauliflower worth six _sous_ can never hope to succeed as a
+cauliflower vendor. Has she really taken the trouble to examine the
+cauliflower for herself, or has love made her blind to its shortcomings?
+
+The owner of the cauliflower is too indignant to reply. She snatches it
+away, appears to be comforting it, replaces it in the basket. The other
+lady is grieved at human obstinacy and stupidity in general. If the
+owner of the cauliflower had had any sense she would have asked four
+_sous_. Eventually business is done at five.
+
+It is the custom everywhere abroad—asking the price of a thing is simply
+opening conversation. A lady told me that, the first day she began
+housekeeping in Florence, she handed over to a poulterer for a chicken
+the price he had demanded—with protestations that he was losing on the
+transaction, but wanted, for family reasons, apparently, to get rid of
+the chicken. He stood for half a minute staring at her, and then, being
+an honest sort of man, threw in a pigeon.
+
+Foreign housekeepers starting business in London appear hurt when our
+tradesmen decline to accept half-a-crown for articles marked
+three-and-six.
+
+“Then why mark it only three-and-sixpence?” is the foreign housekeeper’s
+argument.
+
+
+
+
+SHOULD MARRIED MEN PLAY GOLF?
+
+
+THAT we Englishmen attach too much importance to sport goes without
+saying—or, rather, it has been said so often as to have become a
+commonplace. One of these days some reforming English novelist will
+write a book, showing the evil effects of over-indulgence in sport: the
+neglected business, the ruined home, the slow but sure sapping of the
+brain—what there may have been of it in the beginning—leading to
+semi-imbecility and yearly increasing obesity.
+
+A young couple, I once heard of, went for their honeymoon to Scotland.
+The poor girl did not know he was a golfer (he had wooed and won her
+during a period of idleness enforced by a sprained shoulder), or maybe
+she would have avoided Scotland. The idea they started with was that of
+a tour. The second day the man went out for a stroll by himself. At
+dinner-time he observed, with a far-away look in his eyes, that it seemed
+a pretty spot they had struck, and suggested their staying there another
+day. The next morning after breakfast he borrowed a club from the hotel
+porter, and remarked that he would take a walk while she finished doing
+her hair. He said it amused him, swinging a club while he walked. He
+returned in time for lunch and seemed moody all the afternoon. He said
+the air suited him, and urged that they should linger yet another day.
+
+She was young and inexperienced, and thought, maybe, it was liver. She
+had heard much about liver from her father. The next morning he borrowed
+more clubs, and went out, this time before breakfast, returning to a late
+and not over sociable dinner. That was the end of their honeymoon so far
+as she was concerned. He meant well, but the thing had gone too far.
+The vice had entered into his blood, and the smell of the links drove out
+all other considerations.
+
+We are most of us familiar, I take it, with the story of the golfing
+parson, who could not keep from swearing when the balls went wrong.
+
+“Golf and the ministry don’t seem to go together,” his friend told him.
+“Take my advice before it’s too late, and give it up, Tammas.”
+
+A few months later Tammas met his friend again.
+
+“You were right, Jamie,” cried the parson cheerily, “they didna run well
+in harness; golf and the meenistry, I hae followed your advice: I hae
+gi’en it oop.”
+
+“Then what are ye doing with that sack of clubs?” inquired Jamie.
+
+“What am I doing with them?” repeated the puzzled Tammas. “Why I am
+going to play golf with them.” A light broke upon him. “Great Heavens,
+man!” he continued, “ye didna’ think ’twas the golf I’d gi’en oop?”
+
+The Englishman does not understand play. He makes a life-long labour of
+his sport, and to it sacrifices mind and body. The health resorts of
+Europe—to paraphrase a famous saying that nobody appears to have
+said—draw half their profits from the playing fields of Eton and
+elsewhere. In Swiss and German kurhausen enormously fat men bear down
+upon you and explain to you that once they were the champion sprinters or
+the high-jump representatives of their university—men who now hold on to
+the bannisters and groan as they haul themselves upstairs. Consumptive
+men, between paroxysms of coughing, tell you of the goals they scored
+when they were half-backs or forwards of extraordinary ability.
+Ex-light-weight amateur pugilists, with the figure now of an American
+roll-top desk, butt you into a corner of the billiard-room, and,
+surprised they cannot get as near you as they would desire, whisper to
+you the secret of avoiding the undercut by the swiftness of the backward
+leap. Broken-down tennis players, one-legged skaters, dropsical
+gentlemen-riders, are to be met with hobbling on crutches along every
+highway of the Engadine.
+
+They are pitiable objects. Never having learnt to read anything but the
+sporting papers, books are of no use to them. They never wasted much of
+their youth on thought, and, apparently, have lost the knack of it. They
+don’t care for art, and Nature only suggests to them the things they can
+no longer do. The snow-clad mountain reminds them that once they were
+daring tobogannists; the undulating common makes them sad because they
+can no longer handle a golf-club; by the riverside they sit down and tell
+you of the salmon they caught before they caught rheumatic fever; birds
+only make them long for guns; music raises visions of the local
+cricket-match of long ago, enlivened by the local band; a picturesque
+estaminet, with little tables spread out under the vines, recalls bitter
+memories of ping-pong. One is sorry for them, but their conversation is
+not exhilarating. The man who has other interests in life beyond sport
+is apt to find their reminiscences monotonous; while to one another they
+do not care to talk. One gathers that they do not altogether believe one
+another.
+
+The foreigner is taking kindly to our sports; one hopes he will be
+forewarned by our example and not overdo the thing. At present, one is
+bound to admit, he shows no sign of taking sport too seriously. Football
+is gaining favour more and more throughout Europe. But yet the Frenchman
+has not got it out of his head that the _coup_ to practise is kicking the
+ball high into the air and catching it upon his head. He would rather
+catch the ball upon his head than score a goal. If he can manœuvre the
+ball away into a corner, kick it up into the air twice running, and each
+time catch it on his head, he does not seem to care what happens after
+that. Anybody can have the ball; he has had his game and is happy.
+
+They talk of introducing cricket into Belgium; I shall certainly try to
+be present at the opening game. I am afraid that, until he learns from
+experience, the Belgian fielder will stop cricket balls with his head.
+That the head is the proper thing with which to play ball appears to be
+in his blood. My head is round, he argues, and hard, just like the ball
+itself; what part of the human frame more fit and proper with which to
+meet and stop a ball.
+
+Golf has not yet caught on, but tennis is firmly established from St.
+Petersburg to Bordeaux. The German, with the thoroughness characteristic
+of him, is working hard. University professors, stout majors, rising
+early in the morning, hire boys and practise back-handers and
+half-volleys. But to the Frenchman, as yet, it is a game. He plays it
+in a happy, merry fashion, that is shocking to English eyes.
+
+Your partner’s service rather astonishes you. An occasional yard or so
+beyond the line happens to anyone, but this man’s object appears to be to
+break windows. You feel you really must remonstrate, when the joyous
+laughter and tumultuous applause of the spectators explain the puzzle to
+you. He has not been trying to serve; he has been trying to hit a man in
+the next court who is stooping down to tie up his shoe-lace. With his
+last ball he has succeeded. He has hit the man in the small of the back,
+and has bowled him over. The unanimous opinion of the surrounding
+critics is that the ball could not possibly have been better placed. A
+Doherty has never won greater applause from the crowd. Even the man who
+has been hit appears pleased; it shows what a Frenchman can do when he
+does take up a game.
+
+But French honour demands revenge. He forgets his shoe, he forgets his
+game. He gathers together all the balls that he can find; his balls,
+your balls, anybody’s balls that happen to be handy. And then commences
+the return match. At this point it is best to crouch down under shelter
+of the net. Most of the players round about adopt this plan; the more
+timid make for the club-house, and, finding themselves there, order
+coffee and light up cigarettes. After a while both players appear to be
+satisfied. The other players then gather round to claim their balls.
+This makes a good game by itself. The object is to get as many balls as
+you can, your own and other people’s—for preference other people’s—and
+run off with them round the courts, followed by whooping claimants.
+
+In the course of half-an-hour or so, when everybody is dead beat, the
+game—the original game—is resumed. You demand the score; your partner
+promptly says it is “forty-fifteen.” Both your opponents rush up to the
+net, and apparently there is going to be a duel. It is only a friendly
+altercation; they very much doubt its being “forty-fifteen.”
+“Fifteen-forty” they could believe; they suggest it as a compromise. The
+discussion is concluded by calling it deuce. As it is rare for a game to
+proceed without some such incident occurring in the middle of it, the
+score generally is deuce. This avoids heart-burning; nobody wins a set
+and nobody loses. The one game generally suffices for the afternoon.
+
+To the earnest player, it is also confusing to miss your partner
+occasionally—to turn round and find that he is talking to a man. Nobody
+but yourself takes the slightest objection to his absence. The other
+side appear to regard it as a good opportunity to score. Five minutes
+later he resumes the game. His friend comes with him, also the dog of
+his friend. The dog is welcomed with enthusiasm; all balls are returned
+to the dog. Until the dog is tired you do not get a look in. But all
+this will no doubt soon be changed. There are some excellent French and
+Belgian players; from them their compatriots will gradually learn higher
+ideals. The Frenchman is young in the game. As the right conception of
+the game grows upon him, he will also learn to keep the balls lower.
+
+I suppose it is the continental sky. It is so blue, so beautiful; it
+naturally attracts one. Anyhow, the fact remains that most tennis
+players on the Continent, whether English or foreign, have a tendency to
+aim the ball direct at Heaven. At an English club in Switzerland there
+existed in my days a young Englishman who was really a wonderful player.
+To get the ball past him was almost an impossibility. It was his return
+that was weak. He only had one stroke; the ball went a hundred feet or
+so into the air and descended in his opponent’s court. The other man
+would stand watching it, a little speck in the Heavens, growing gradually
+bigger and bigger as it neared the earth. Newcomers would chatter to
+him, thinking he had detected a balloon or an eagle. He would wave them
+aside, explain to them that he would talk to them later, after the
+arrival of the ball. It would fall with a thud at his feet, rise another
+twenty yards or so and again descend. When it was at the proper height
+he would hit it back over the net, and the next moment it would be
+mounting the sky again. At tournaments I have seen that young man, with
+tears in his eyes, pleading to be given an umpire. Every umpire had
+fled. They hid behind trees, borrowed silk hats and umbrellas and
+pretended they were visitors—any device, however mean, to avoid the task
+of umpiring for that young man. Provided his opponent did not go to
+sleep or get cramp, one game might last all day. Anyone could return his
+balls; but, as I have said, to get a ball past him was almost an
+impossibility. He invariably won; the other man, after an hour or so,
+would get mad and try to lose. It was his only chance of dinner.
+
+It is a pretty sight, generally speaking, a tennis ground abroad. The
+women pay more attention to their costumes than do our lady players. The
+men are usually in spotless white. The ground is often charmingly
+situated, the club-house picturesque; there is always laughter and
+merriment. The play may not be so good to watch, but the picture is
+delightful. I accompanied a man a little while ago to his club on the
+outskirts of Brussels. The ground was bordered by a wood on one side,
+and surrounded on the other three by _petites fermes_—allotments, as we
+should call them in England, worked by the peasants themselves.
+
+It was a glorious spring afternoon. The courts were crowded. The red
+earth and the green grass formed a background against which the women, in
+their new Parisian toilets, under their bright parasols, stood out like
+wondrous bouquets of moving flowers. The whole atmosphere was a
+delightful mingling of idle gaiety, flirtation, and graceful
+sensuousness. A modern Watteau would have seized upon the scene with
+avidity.
+
+Just beyond—separated by the almost invisible wire fencing—a group of
+peasants were working in the field. An old woman and a young girl, with
+ropes about their shoulders, were drawing a harrow, guided by a withered
+old scarecrow of a man. They paused for a moment at the wire fencing,
+and looked through. It was an odd contrast; the two worlds divided by
+that wire fencing—so slight, almost invisible. The girl swept the sweat
+from her face with her hand; the woman pushed back her grey locks
+underneath the handkerchief knotted about her head; the old man
+straightened himself with some difficulty. So they stood, for perhaps a
+minute, gazing with quiet, passionless faces through that slight fencing,
+that a push from their work-hardened hands might have levelled.
+
+Was there any thought, I wonder, passing through their brains? The young
+girl—she was a handsome creature in spite of her disfiguring garments.
+The woman—it was a wonderfully fine face: clear, calm eyes, deep-set
+under a square broad brow. The withered old scarecrow—ever sowing the
+seed in the spring of the fruit that others shall eat.
+
+The old man bent again over the guiding ropes: gave the word. The team
+moved forward up the hill. It is Anatole France, I think, who says:
+Society is based upon the patience of the poor.
+
+
+
+
+ARE EARLY MARRIAGES A MISTAKE?
+
+
+I AM chary nowadays of offering counsel in connection with subjects
+concerning which I am not and cannot be an authority. Long ago I once
+took upon myself to write a paper about babies. It did not aim to be a
+textbook on the subject. It did not even claim to exhaust the topic. I
+was willing that others, coming after me, should continue the
+argument—that is if, upon reflection, they were still of opinion there
+was anything more to be said. I was pleased with the article. I went
+out of my way to obtain an early copy of the magazine in which it
+appeared, on purpose to show it to a lady friend of mine. She was the
+possessor of one or two babies of her own, specimens in no way
+remarkable, though she herself, as was natural enough, did her best to
+boom them. I thought it might be helpful to her: the views and
+observations, not of a rival fancier, who would be prejudiced, but of an
+intelligent amateur. I put the magazine into her hands, opened at the
+proper place.
+
+“Read it through carefully and quietly,” I said; “don’t let anything
+distract you. Have a pencil and a bit of paper ready at your side, and
+note down any points upon which you would like further information. If
+there is anything you think I have missed out let me know. It may be
+that here and there you will be disagreeing with me. If so, do not
+hesitate to mention it, I shall not be angry. If a demand arises I shall
+very likely issue an enlarged and improved edition of this paper in the
+form of a pamphlet, in which case hints and suggestions that to you may
+appear almost impertinent will be of distinct help to me.”
+
+“I haven’t got a pencil,” she said; “what’s it all about?”
+
+“It’s about babies,” I explained, and I lent her a pencil.
+
+That is another thing I have learnt. Never lend a pencil to a woman if
+you ever want to see it again. She has three answers to your request for
+its return. The first, that she gave it back to you and that you put it
+in your pocket, and that it’s there now, and that if it isn’t it ought to
+be. The second, that you never lent it to her. The third, that she
+wishes people would not lend her pencils and then clamour for them back,
+just when she has something else far more important to think about.
+
+“What do you know about babies?” she demanded.
+
+“If you will read the paper,” I replied, “you will see for yourself.
+It’s all there.”
+
+She flicked over the pages contemptuously.
+
+“There doesn’t seem much of it?” she retorted.
+
+“It is condensed,” I pointed out to her.
+
+“I am glad it is short. All right, I’ll read it,” she agreed.
+
+I thought my presence might disturb her, so went out into the garden. I
+wanted her to get the full benefit of it. I crept back now and again to
+peep through the open window. She did not seem to be making many notes.
+But I heard her making little noises to herself. When I saw she had
+reached the last page, I re-entered the room.
+
+“Well?” I said.
+
+“Is it meant to be funny,” she demanded, “or is it intended to be taken
+seriously?”
+
+“There may be flashes of humour here and there—”
+
+She did not wait for me to finish.
+
+“Because if it’s meant to be funny,” she said, “I don’t think it is at
+all funny. And if it is intended to be serious, there’s one thing very
+clear, and that is that you are not a mother.”
+
+With the unerring instinct of the born critic she had divined my one weak
+point. Other objections raised against me I could have met. But that
+one stinging reproach was unanswerable. It has made me, as I have
+explained, chary of tendering advice on matters outside my own department
+of life. Otherwise, every year, about Valentine’s day, there is much
+that I should like to say to my good friends the birds. I want to put it
+to them seriously. Is not the month of February just a little too early?
+Of course, their answer would be the same as in the case of my motherly
+friend.
+
+“Oh, what do you know about it? you are not a bird.”
+
+I know I am not a bird, but that is the very reason why they should
+listen to me. I bring a fresh mind to bear upon the subject. I am not
+tied down by bird convention. February, my dear friends—in these
+northern climes of ours at all events—is much too early. You have to
+build in a high wind, and nothing, believe me, tries a lady’s temper more
+than being blown about. Nature is nature, and womenfolk, my dear sirs,
+are the same all the world over, whether they be birds or whether they be
+human. I am an older person than most of you, and I speak with the
+weight of experience.
+
+If I were going to build a house with my wife, I should not choose a
+season of the year when the bricks and planks and things were liable to
+be torn out of her hand, her skirts blown over her head, and she left
+clinging for dear life to a scaffolding pole. I know the feminine biped
+and, you take it from me, that is not her notion of a honeymoon. In
+April or May, the sun shining, the air balmy—when, after carrying up to
+her a load or two of bricks, and a hod or two of mortar, we could knock
+off work for a few minutes without fear of the whole house being swept
+away into the next street—could sit side by side on the top of a wall,
+our legs dangling down, and peck and morsel together; after which I could
+whistle a bit to her—then housebuilding might be a pleasure.
+
+The swallows are wisest; June is their idea, and a very good idea, too.
+In a mountain village in the Tyrol, early one summer, I had the
+opportunity of watching very closely the building of a swallow’s nest.
+After coffee, the first morning, I stepped out from the great, cool, dark
+passage of the wirtschaft into the blazing sunlight, and, for no
+particular reason, pulled-to the massive door behind me. While filling
+my pipe, a swallow almost brushed by me, then wheeled round again, and
+took up a position on the fence only a few yards from me. He was
+carrying what to him was an exceptionally large and heavy brick. He put
+it down beside him on the fence, and called out something which I could
+not understand. I did not move. He got quite excited and said some
+more. It was undoubtable he was addressing me—nobody else was by. I
+judged from his tone that he was getting cross with me. At this point my
+travelling companion, his toilet unfinished, put his head out of the
+window just above me.
+
+“Such an odd thing,” he called down to me. “I never noticed it last
+night. A pair of swallows are building a nest here in the hall. You’ve
+got to be careful you don’t mistake it for a hat-peg. The old lady says
+they have built there regularly for the last three years.”
+
+Then it came to me what it was the gentleman had been saying to me: “I
+say, sir, you with the bit of wood in your mouth, you have been and shut
+the door and I can’t get in.”
+
+Now, with the key in my possession, it was so clear and understandable, I
+really forgot for the moment he was only a bird.
+
+“I beg your pardon,” I replied, “I had no idea. Such an extraordinary
+place to build a nest.”
+
+I opened the door for him, and, taking up his brick again, he entered,
+and I followed him in. There was a deal of talk.
+
+“He shut the door,” I heard him say, “Chap there, sucking the bit of
+wood. Thought I was never going to get in.”
+
+“I know,” was the answer; “it has been so dark in here, if you’ll believe
+me, I’ve hardly been able to see what I’ve been doing.”
+
+“Fine brick, isn’t it? Where will you have it?”
+
+Observing me sitting there, they lowered their voices. Evidently she
+wanted him to put the brick down and leave her to think. She was not
+quite sure where she would have it. He, on the other hand, was sure he
+had found the right place for it. He pointed it out to her and explained
+his views. Other birds quarrel a good deal during nest building, but
+swallows are the gentlest of little people. She let him put it where he
+wanted to, and he kissed her and ran out. She cocked her eye after him,
+watched till he was out of sight, then deftly and quickly slipped it out
+and fixed it the other side of the door.
+
+“Poor dears” (I could see it in the toss of her head); “they will think
+they know best; it is just as well not to argue with them.”
+
+Every summer I suffer much from indignation. I love to watch the
+swallows building. They build beneath the eaves outside my study window.
+Such cheerful little chatter-boxes they are. Long after sunset, when all
+the other birds are sleeping, the swallows still are chattering softly.
+It sounds as if they were telling one another some pretty story, and
+often I am sure there must be humour in it, for every now and then one
+hears a little twittering laugh. I delight in having them there, so
+close to me. The fancy comes to me that one day, when my brain has grown
+more cunning, I, too, listening in the twilight, shall hear the stories
+that they tell.
+
+One or two phrases already I have come to understand: “Once upon a
+time”—“Long, long ago”—“In a strange, far-off land.” I hear these words
+so constantly, I am sure I have them right. I call it “Swallow Street,”
+this row of six or seven nests. Two or three, like villas in their own
+grounds, stand alone, and others are semi-detached. It makes me angry
+that the sparrows will come and steal them. The sparrows will hang about
+deliberately waiting for a pair of swallows to finish their nest, and
+then, with a brutal laugh that makes my blood boil, drive the swallows
+away and take possession of it. And the swallows are so wonderfully
+patient.
+
+“Never mind, old girl,” says Tommy Swallow, after the first big cry is
+over, to Jenny Swallow, “let’s try again.”
+
+And half an hour later, full of fresh plans, they are choosing another
+likely site, chattering cheerfully once more. I watched the building of
+a particular nest for nearly a fortnight one year; and when, after two or
+three days’ absence, I returned and found a pair of sparrows comfortably
+encsonced therein, I just felt mad. I saw Mrs. Sparrow looking out.
+Maybe my anger was working upon my imagination, but it seemed to me that
+she nodded to me:
+
+“Nice little house, ain’t it? What I call well built.”
+
+Mr. Sparrow then flew up with a gaudy feather, dyed blue, which belonged
+to me. I recognised it. It had come out of the brush with which the
+girl breaks the china ornaments in our drawing-room. At any other time I
+should have been glad to see him flying off with the whole thing, handle
+included. But now I felt the theft of that one feather as an added
+injury. Mrs. Sparrow chirped with delight at sight of the gaudy
+monstrosity. Having got the house cheap, they were going to spend their
+small amount of energy upon internal decoration. That was their idea
+clearly, a “Liberty interior.” She looked more like a Cockney sparrow
+than a country one—had been born and bred in Regent Street, no doubt.
+
+“There is not much justice in this world,” said I to myself; “but there’s
+going to be some introduced into this business—that is, if I can find a
+ladder.”
+
+I did find a ladder, and fortunately it was long enough. Mr. and Mrs.
+Sparrow were out when I arrived, possibly on the hunt for cheap photo
+frames and Japanese fans. I did not want to make a mess. I removed the
+house neatly into a dust-pan, and wiped the street clear of every trace
+of it. I had just put back the ladder when Mrs. Sparrow returned with a
+piece of pink cotton-wool in her mouth. That was her idea of a colour
+scheme: apple-blossom pink and Reckitt’s blue side by side. She dropped
+her wool and sat on the waterspout, and tried to understand things.
+
+“Number one, number two, number four; where the blazes”—sparrows are
+essentially common, and the women are as bad as the men—“is number
+three?”
+
+Mr. Sparrow came up from behind, over the roof. He was carrying a piece
+of yellow-fluff, part of a lamp-shade, as far as I could judge.
+
+“Move yourself,” he said, “what’s the sense of sitting there in the
+rain?”
+
+“I went out just for a moment,” replied Mrs. Sparrow; “I could not have
+been gone, no, not a couple of minutes. When I came back—”
+
+“Oh, get indoors,” said Mr. Sparrow, “talk about it there.”
+
+“It’s what I’m telling you,” continued Mrs. Sparrow, “if you would only
+listen. There isn’t any door, there isn’t any house—”
+
+“Isn’t any—” Mr. Sparrow, holding on to the rim of the spout, turned
+himself topsy-turvy and surveyed the street. From where I was standing
+behind the laurel bushes I could see nothing but his back.
+
+He stood up again, looking angry and flushed.
+
+“What have you done with the house? Can’t I turn my back a minute—”
+
+“I ain’t done nothing with it. As I keep on telling you, I had only just
+gone—”
+
+“Oh, bother where you had gone. Where’s the darned house gone? that’s
+what I want to know.”
+
+They looked at one another. If ever astonishment was expressed in the
+attitude of a bird it was told by the tails of those two sparrows. They
+whispered wickedly together. The idea occurred to them that by force or
+cunning they might perhaps obtain possession of one of the other nests.
+But all the other nests were occupied, and even gentle Jenny Swallow,
+once in her own home with the children round about her, is not to be
+trifled with. Mr. Sparrow called at number two, put his head in at the
+door, and then returned to the waterspout.
+
+“Lady says we don’t live there,” he explained to Mrs. Sparrow. There was
+silence for a while.
+
+“Not what I call a classy street,” commented Mrs. Sparrow.
+
+“If it were not for that terrible tired feeling of mine,” said Mr.
+Sparrow, “blame if I wouldn’t build a house of my own.”
+
+“Perhaps,” said Mrs. Sparrow, “—I have heard it said that a little bit of
+work, now and then, does you good.”
+
+“All sorts of wild ideas about in the air nowadays,” said Mr. Sparrow,
+“it don’t do to listen to everybody.”
+
+“And it don’t do to sit still and do nothing neither,” snapped Mrs.
+Sparrow. “I don’t want to have to forget I’m a lady, but—well, any man
+who was a man would see things for himself.”
+
+“Why did I every marry?” retorted Mr. Sparrow.
+
+They flew away together, quarrelling.
+
+
+
+
+DO WRITERS WRITE TOO MUCH?
+
+
+ON a newspaper placard, the other day, I saw announced a new novel by a
+celebrated author. I bought a copy of the paper, and turned eagerly to
+the last page. I was disappointed to find that I had missed the first
+six chapters. The story had commenced the previous Saturday; this was
+Friday. I say I was disappointed and so I was, at first. But my
+disappointment did not last long. The bright and intelligent sub-editor,
+according to the custom now in vogue, had provided me with a short
+synopsis of those first six chapters, so that without the trouble of
+reading them I knew what they were all about.
+
+“The first instalment,” I learned, “introduces the reader to a brilliant
+and distinguished company, assembled in the drawing-room of Lady Mary’s
+maisonette in Park Street. Much smart talk is indulged in.”
+
+I know that “smart talk” so well. Had I not been lucky enough to miss
+that first chapter I should have had to listen to it once again.
+Possibly, here and there, it might have been new to me, but it would have
+read, I know, so very like the old. A dear, sweet white-haired lady of
+my acquaintance is never surprised at anything that happens.
+
+“Something very much of the same kind occurred,” she will remember, “one
+winter when we were staying in Brighton. Only on that occasion the man’s
+name, I think, was Robinson.”
+
+We do not live new stories—nor write them either. The man’s name in the
+old story was Robinson, we alter it to Jones. It happened, in the old
+forgotten tale, at Brighton, in the winter time; we change it to
+Eastbourne, in the spring. It is new and original—to those who have not
+heard “something very like it” once before.
+
+“Much smart talk is indulged in,” so the sub-editor has explained. There
+is absolutely no need to ask for more than that. There is a Duchess who
+says improper things. Once she used to shock me. But I know her now.
+She is really a nice woman; she doesn’t mean them. And when the heroine
+is in trouble, towards the middle of the book, she is just as amusing on
+the side of virtue. Then there is a younger lady whose speciality is
+proverbs. Apparently whenever she hears a proverb she writes it down and
+studies it with the idea of seeing into how many different forms it can
+be twisted. It looks clever; as a matter of fact, it is extremely easy.
+
+_Be virtuous and you will be happy_.
+
+She jots down all the possible variations: _Be virtuous and you will be
+unhappy_.
+
+“Too simple that one,” she tells herself. _Be virtuous and your friends
+will be happy if you are not_.
+
+“Better, but not wicked enough. Let us think again. _Be happy and
+people will jump to the conclusion that you are virtuous_.
+
+“That’s good, I’ll try that one at to-morrow’s party.”
+
+She is a painstaking lady. One feels that, better advised, she might
+have been of use in the world.
+
+There is likewise a disgraceful old Peer who tells naughty stories, but
+who is good at heart; and one person so very rude that the wonder is who
+invited him.
+
+Occasionally a slangy girl is included, and a clergyman, who takes the
+heroine aside and talks sense to her, flavoured with epigram. All these
+people chatter a mixture of Lord Chesterfield and Oliver Wendell Holmes,
+of Heine, Voltaire, Madame de Stael, and the late lamented H. J. Byron.
+“How they do it beats me,” as I once overheard at a music hall a stout
+lady confess to her friend while witnessing the performance of a clever
+troup, styling themselves “The Boneless Wonders of the Universe.”
+
+The synopsis added that: “Ursula Bart, a charming and unsophisticated
+young American girl possessed of an elusive expression makes her first
+acquaintance with London society.”
+
+Here you have a week’s unnecessary work on the part of the author boiled
+down to its essentials. She was young. One hardly expects an elderly
+heroine. The “young” might have been dispensed with, especially seeing
+it is told us that she was a girl. But maybe this is carping. There are
+young girls and old girls. Perhaps it is as well to have it in black and
+white; she was young. She was an American young girl. There is but one
+American young girl in English fiction. We know by heart the
+unconventional things that she will do, the startlingly original things
+that she will say, the fresh illuminating thoughts that will come to her
+as, clad in a loose robe of some soft clinging stuff, she sits before the
+fire, in the solitude of her own room.
+
+To complete her she had an “elusive expression.” The days when we used
+to catalogue the heroine’s “points” are past. Formerly it was possible.
+A man wrote perhaps some half-a-dozen novels during the whole course of
+his career. He could have a dark girl for the first, a light girl for
+the second, sketch a merry little wench for the third, and draw you
+something stately for the fourth. For the remaining two he could go
+abroad. Nowadays, when a man turns out a novel and six short stories
+once a year, description has to be dispensed with. It is not the
+writer’s fault. There is not sufficient variety in the sex. We used to
+introduce her thus:
+
+“Imagine to yourself, dear reader, an exquisite and gracious creature of
+five feet three. Her golden hair of that peculiar shade”—here would
+follow directions enabling the reader to work it out for himself. He was
+to pour some particular wine into some particular sort of glass, and wave
+it about before some particular sort of a light. Or he was to get up at
+five o’clock on a March morning and go into a wood. In this way he could
+satisfy himself as to the particular shade of gold the heroine’s hair
+might happen to be. If he were a careless or lazy reader he could save
+himself time and trouble by taking the author’s word for it. Many of
+them did.
+
+“Her eyes!” They were invariably deep and liquid. They had to be pretty
+deep to hold all the odds and ends that were hidden in them; sunlight and
+shadow, mischief, unsuspected possibilities, assorted emotions, strange
+wild yearnings. Anything we didn’t know where else to put we said was
+hidden in her eyes.
+
+“Her nose!” You could have made it for yourself out of a pen’orth of
+putty after reading our description of it.
+
+“Her forehead!” It was always “low and broad.” I don’t know why it was
+always low. Maybe because the intellectual heroine was not then popular.
+For the matter of that I doubt if she be really popular now. The
+brainless doll, one fears, will continue for many years to come to be
+man’s ideal woman—and woman’s ideal of herself for precisely the same
+period, one may be sure.
+
+“Her chin!” A less degree of variety was permissible in her chin. It
+had to be at an angle suggestive of piquancy, and it had to contain at
+least the suspicion of a dimple.
+
+To properly understand her complexion you were expected to provide
+yourself with a collection of assorted fruits and flowers. There are
+seasons in the year when it must have been difficult for the
+conscientious reader to have made sure of her complexion. Possibly it
+was for this purpose that wax flowers and fruit, carefully kept from the
+dust under glass cases, were common objects in former times upon the
+tables of the cultured.
+
+Nowadays we content ourselves—and our readers also, I am inclined to
+think—with dashing her off in a few bold strokes. We say that whenever
+she entered a room there came to one dreams of an old world garden, the
+sound of far-off bells. Or that her presence brought with it the scent
+of hollyhocks and thyme. As a matter of fact I don’t think hollyhocks do
+smell. It is a small point; about such we do not trouble ourselves. In
+the case of the homely type of girl I don’t see why we should not borrow
+Mr. Pickwick’s expression, and define her by saying that in some subtle
+way she always contrived to suggest an odour of chops and tomato sauce.
+
+If we desire to be exact we mention, as this particular author seems to
+have done, that she had an “elusive expression,” or a penetrating
+fragrance. Or we say that she moved, the centre of an indefinable
+nuance.
+
+But it is not policy to bind oneself too closely to detail. A wise
+friend of mine, who knows his business, describes his hero invariably in
+the vaguest terms. He will not even tell you whether the man is tall or
+short, clean shaven or bearded.
+
+“Make the fellow nice,” is his advice. “Let every woman reader picture
+him to herself as her particular man. Then everything he says and does
+becomes of importance to her. She is careful not to miss a word.”
+
+For the same reason he sees to it that his heroine has a bit of every
+girl in her. Generally speaking, she is a cross between Romola and Dora
+Copperfield. His novels command enormous sales. The women say he draws
+a man to the life, but does not seem to know much about women. The men
+like his women, but think his men stupid.
+
+Of another famous author no woman of my acquaintance is able to speak too
+highly. They tell me his knowledge of their sex is simply marvellous,
+his insight, his understanding of them almost uncanny. Thinking it might
+prove useful, I made an exhaustive study of his books. I noticed that
+his women were without exception brilliant charming creatures possessed
+of the wit of a Lady Wortlay Montagu, combined with the wisdom of a
+George Eliot. They were not all of them good women, but all of them were
+clever and all of them were fascinating. I came to the conclusion that
+his lady critics were correct: he did understand women. But to return to
+our synopsis.
+
+The second chapter, it appeared, transported us to Yorkshire where:
+“Basil Longleat, a typical young Englishman, lately home from college,
+resides with his widowed mother and two sisters. They are a delightful
+family.”
+
+What a world of trouble to both writer and to reader is here saved. “A
+typical young Englishman!” The author probably wrote five pages,
+elaborating. The five words of the sub-editor present him to me more
+vividly. I see him positively glistening from the effects of soap and
+water. I see his clear blue eye; his fair crisp locks, the natural
+curliness of which annoys him personally, though alluring to everybody
+else; his frank winning smile. He is “lately home from college.” That
+tells me that he is a first-class cricketer; a first-class oar; that as a
+half-back he is incomparable; that he swims like Captain Webb; is in the
+first rank of tennis players; that his half-volley at ping-pong has never
+been stopped. It doesn’t tell me much about his brain power. The
+description of him as a “typical young Englishman” suggests more
+information on this particular point. One assumes that the American girl
+with the elusive expression is going to have sufficient for both.
+
+“They are a delightful family.” The sub-editor does not say so, but I
+imagine the two sisters are likewise typical young Englishwomen. They
+ride and shoot and cook and make their own dresses, have common sense and
+love a joke.
+
+The third chapter is “taken up with the humours of a local cricket
+match.”
+
+Thank you, Mr. Sub-editor. I feel I owe you gratitude.
+
+In the fourth, Ursula Bart (I was beginning to get anxious about her)
+turns up again. She is staying at the useful Lady Mary’s place in
+Yorkshire. She meets Basil by accident one morning while riding alone.
+That is the advantage of having an American girl for your heroine. Like
+the British army: it goes anywhere and does anything.
+
+In chapter five Basil and Ursula meet again; this time at a picnic. The
+sub-editor does not wish to repeat himself, otherwise he possibly would
+have summed up chapter five by saying it was “taken up with the humours
+of the usual picnic.”
+
+In chapter six something happens:
+
+“Basil, returning home in the twilight, comes across Ursula Bart, in a
+lonely point of the moor, talking earnestly to a rough-looking stranger.
+His approach over the soft turf being unnoticed, he cannot help
+overhearing Ursula’s parting words to the forbidding-looking stranger: ‘I
+must see you again! To-morrow night at half-past nine! In the gateway
+of the ruined abbey!’ Who is he? And why must Ursula see him again at
+such an hour, in such a spot?”
+
+So here, at cost of reading twenty lines, I am landed, so to speak, at
+the beginning of the seventh chapter. Why don’t I set to work to read
+it? The sub-editor has spoiled me.
+
+“You read it,” I want to say to him. “Tell me to-morrow morning what it
+is all about. Who was this bounder? Why should Ursula want to see him
+again? Why choose a draughty place? Why half-past nine o’clock at
+night, which must have been an awkward time for both of them—likely to
+lead to talk? Why should I wade though this seventh chapter of three
+columns and a half? It’s your work. What are you paid for?”
+
+My fear is lest this sort of thing shall lead to a demand on the part of
+the public for condensed novels. What busy man is going to spend a week
+of evenings reading a book when a nice kind sub-editor is prepared in
+five minutes to tell him what it is all about!
+
+Then there will come a day—I feel it—when the business-like Editor will
+say to himself: “What in thunder is the sense of my paying one man to
+write a story of sixty thousand words and another man to read it and tell
+it again in sixteen hundred!”
+
+We shall be expected to write our novels in chapters not exceeding twenty
+words. Our short stories will be reduced to the formula: “Little boy.
+Pair of skates. Broken ice, Heaven’s gates.” Formerly an author,
+commissioned to supply a child’s tragedy of this genre for a Christmas
+number, would have spun it out into five thousand words. Personally, I
+should have commenced the previous spring—given the reader the summer and
+autumn to get accustomed to the boy. He would have been a good boy; the
+sort of boy that makes a bee-line for the thinnest ice. He would have
+lived in a cottage. I could have spread that cottage over two pages; the
+things that grew in the garden, the view from the front door. You would
+have known that boy before I had done with him—felt you had known him all
+your life. His quaint sayings, his childish thoughts, his great longings
+would have been impressed upon you. The father might have had a dash of
+humour in him, the mother’s early girlhood would have lent itself to
+pretty writing. For the ice we would have had a mysterious lake in the
+wood, said to be haunted. The boy would have loved o’ twilights to stand
+upon its margin. He would have heard strange voices calling to him. You
+would have felt the thing was coming.
+
+So much might have been done. When I think of that plot wasted in nine
+words it makes me positively angry.
+
+And what is to become of us writers if this is to be the new fashion in
+literature? We are paid by the length of our manuscript at rates from
+half-a-crown a thousand words, and upwards. In the case of fellows like
+Doyle and Kipling I am told it runs into pounds. How are we to live on
+novels the serial rights of which to most of us will work out at four and
+nine-pence.
+
+It can’t be done. It is no good telling me you can see no reason why we
+should live. That is no answer. I’m talking plain business.
+
+And what about book-rights? Who is going to buy novels of three pages?
+They will have to be printed as leaflets and sold at a penny a dozen.
+Marie Corelli and Hall Caine—if all I hear about them is true—will
+possibly make their ten or twelve shillings a week. But what about the
+rest of us? This thing is worrying me.
+
+
+
+
+SHOULD SOLDIERS BE POLITE?
+
+
+MY desire was once to pass a peaceful and pleasant winter in Brussels,
+attending to my work, improving my mind. Brussels is a bright and
+cheerful town, and I think I could have succeeded had it not been for the
+Belgian Army. The Belgian Army would follow me about and worry me.
+Judging of it from my own experience, I should say it was a good army.
+Napoleon laid it down as an axiom that your enemy never ought to be
+permitted to get away from you—never ought to be allowed to feel, even
+for a moment, that he had shaken you off. What tactics the Belgian Army
+might adopt under other conditions I am unable to say, but against me
+personally that was the plan of campaign it determined upon and carried
+out with a success that was astonishing, even to myself.
+
+I found it utterly impossible to escape from the Belgian Army. I made a
+point of choosing the quietest and most unlikely streets, I chose all
+hours—early in the morning, in the afternoon, late in the evening. There
+were moments of wild exaltation when I imagined I had given it the slip.
+I could not see it anywhere, I could not hear it.
+
+“Now,” said I to myself, “now for five minutes’ peace and quiet.”
+
+I had been doing it injustice: it had been working round me. Approaching
+the next corner, I would hear the tattoo of its drum. Before I had gone
+another quarter of a mile it would be in full pursuit of me. I would
+jump upon a tram, and travel for miles. Then, thinking I had shaken it
+off, I would alight and proceed upon my walk. Five minutes later another
+detachment would be upon my heels. I would slink home, the Belgian Army
+pursuing me with its exultant tattoo. Vanquished, shamed, my insular
+pride for ever vanished, I would creep up into my room and close the
+door. The victorious Belgian Army would then march back to barracks.
+
+If only it had followed me with a band: I like a band. I can loaf
+against a post, listening to a band with anyone. I should not have
+minded so much had it come after me with a band. But the Belgian Army,
+apparently, doesn’t run to a band. It has nothing but this drum. It has
+not even a real drum—not what I call a drum. It is a little boy’s drum,
+the sort of thing I used to play myself at one time, until people took it
+away from me, and threatened that if they heard it once again that day
+they would break it over my own head. It is cowardly going up and down,
+playing a drum of this sort, when there is nobody to stop you. The man
+would not dare to do it if his mother was about. He does not even play
+it. He walks along tapping it with a little stick. There’s no tune,
+there’s no sense in it. He does not even keep time. I used to think at
+first, hearing it in the distance, that it was the work of some young
+gamin who ought to be at school, or making himself useful taking the baby
+out in the perambulator: and I would draw back into dark doorways,
+determined, as he came by, to dart out and pull his ear for him. To my
+astonishment—for the first week—I learnt it was the Belgian Army, getting
+itself accustomed, one supposes, to the horrors of war. It had the
+effect of making me a peace-at-any-price man.
+
+They tell me these armies are necessary to preserve the tranquility of
+Europe. For myself, I should be willing to run the risk of an occasional
+row. Cannot someone tell them they are out of date, with their bits of
+feathers and their odds and ends of ironmongery—grown men that cannot be
+sent out for a walk unless accompanied by a couple of nursemen, blowing a
+tin whistle and tapping a drum out of a toy shop to keep them in order
+and prevent their running about: one might think they were chickens. A
+herd of soldiers with their pots and pans and parcels, and all their
+deadly things tied on to them, prancing about in time to a tune, makes me
+think always of the White Knight that Alice met in Wonderland. I take it
+that for practical purposes—to fight for your country, or to fight for
+somebody else’s country, which is, generally speaking, more popular—the
+thing essential is that a certain proportion of the populace should be
+able to shoot straight with a gun. How standing in a line and turning
+out your toes is going to assist you, under modern conditions of warfare,
+is one of the many things my intellect is incapable of grasping.
+
+In mediæval days, when men fought hand to hand, there must have been
+advantage in combined and precise movement. When armies were mere iron
+machines, the simple endeavour of each being to push the other off the
+earth, then the striking simultaneously with a thousand arms was part of
+the game. Now, when we shoot from behind cover with smokeless powder,
+brain not brute force—individual sense not combined solidity is surely
+the result to be aimed at. Cannot somebody, as I have suggested, explain
+to the military man that the proper place for the drill sergeant nowadays
+is under a glass case in some museum of antiquities?
+
+I lived once near the Hyde Park barracks, and saw much of the drill
+sergeant’s method. Generally speaking, he is a stout man with the walk
+of an egotistical pigeon. His voice is one of the most extraordinary
+things in nature: if you can distinguish it from the bark of a dog, you
+are clever. They tell me that the privates, after a little practice,
+can—which gives one a higher opinion of their intelligence than otherwise
+one might form. But myself I doubt even this statement. I was the owner
+of a fine retriever dog about the time of which I am speaking, and
+sometimes he and I would amuse ourselves by watching Mr. Sergeant
+exercising his squad. One morning he had been shouting out the usual
+“Whough, whough, whough!” for about ten minutes, and all had hitherto
+gone well. Suddenly, and evidently to his intense astonishment, the
+squad turned their backs upon him and commenced to walk towards the
+Serpentine.
+
+“Halt!” yelled the sergeant, the instant his amazed indignation permitted
+him to speak, which fortunately happened in time to save the detachment
+from a watery grave.
+
+The squad halted.
+
+“Who the thunder, and the blazes, and other things told you to do that?”
+
+The squad looked bewildered, but said nothing, and were brought back to
+the place where they were before. A minute later precisely the same
+thing occurred again. I really thought the sergeant would burst. I was
+preparing to hasten to the barracks for medical aid. But the paroxysm
+passed. Calling upon the combined forces of heaven and hell to sustain
+him in his trouble, he requested his squad, as man to man, to inform him
+of the reason why to all appearance they were dispensing with his
+services and drilling themselves.
+
+At this moment “Columbus” barked again, and the explanation came to him.
+
+“Please go away, sir,” he requested me. “How can I exercise my men with
+that dog of yours interfering every five minutes?”
+
+It was not only on that occasion. It happened at other times. The dog
+seemed to understand and take a pleasure in it. Sometimes meeting a
+soldier, walking with his sweetheart, Columbus, from behind my legs,
+would bark suddenly. Immediately the man would let go the girl and
+proceed, involuntarily, to perform military tricks.
+
+The War Office authorities accused me of having trained the dog. I had
+not trained him: that was his natural voice. I suggested to the War
+Office authorities that instead of quarrelling with my dog for talking
+his own language, they should train their sergeants to use English.
+
+They would not see it. Unpleasantness was in the air, and, living where
+I did at the time, I thought it best to part with Columbus. I could see
+what the War Office was driving at, and I did not desire that
+responsibility for the inefficiency of the British Army should be laid at
+my door.
+
+Some twenty years ago we, in London, were passing through a riotous
+period, and a call was made to law-abiding citizens to enrol themselves
+as special constables. I was young, and the hope of trouble appealed to
+me more than it does now. In company with some five or six hundred other
+more or less respectable citizens, I found myself one Sunday morning in
+the drill yard of the Albany Barracks. It was the opinion of the
+authorities that we could guard our homes and protect our wives and
+children better if first of all we learned to roll our “eyes right” or
+left at the given word of command, and to walk with our thumbs stuck out.
+Accordingly a drill sergeant was appointed to instruct us on these
+points. He came out of the canteen, wiping his mouth and flicking his
+leg, according to rule, with the regulation cane. But, as he approached
+us, his expression changed. We were stout, pompous-looking gentlemen,
+the majority of us, in frock coats and silk hats. The sergeant was a man
+with a sense of the fitness of things. The idea of shouting and swearing
+at us fell from him: and that gone there seemed to be no happy medium
+left to him. The stiffness departed from his back. He met us with a
+defferential attitude, and spoke to us in the language of social
+intercourse.
+
+“Good morning, gentlemen,” said the sergeant.
+
+“Good morning,” we replied: and there was a pause.
+
+The sergeant fidgetted upon his feet. We waited.
+
+“Well, now, gentlemen,” said the sergeant, with a pleasant smile, “what
+do you say to falling in?”
+
+We agreed to fall in. He showed us how to do it. He cast a critical eye
+along the back of our rear line.
+
+“A little further forward, number three, if you don’t mind, sir,” he
+suggested.
+
+Number three, who was an important-looking gentleman, stepped forward.
+
+The sergeant cast his critical eye along the front of the first line.
+
+“A little further back, if you don’t mind, sir,” he suggested, addressing
+the third gentleman from the end.
+
+“Can’t,” explained the third gentleman, “much as I can do to keep where I
+am.”
+
+The sergeant cast his critical eye between the lines.
+
+“Ah,” said the sergeant, “a little full-chested, some of us. We will
+make the distance another foot, if you please, gentlemen.”
+
+In pleasant manner, like to this, the drill proceeded.
+
+“Now then, gentlemen, shall we try a little walk? Quick march! Thank
+you, gentlemen. Sorry to trouble you, but it may be necessary to
+run—forward I mean, of course.. So if you really do not mind, we will
+now do the double quick. Halt! And if next time you can keep a little
+more in line—it has a more imposing appearance, if you understand me.
+The breathing comes with practice.”
+
+If the thing must be done at all, why should it not be done in this way?
+Why should not the sergeant address the new recruits politely:
+
+“Now then, you young chaps, are you all ready? Don’t hurry yourselves:
+no need to make hard work of what should be a pleasure to all of us.
+That’s right, that’s very good indeed—considering you are only novices.
+But there is still something to be desired in your attitude, Private
+Bully-boy. You will excuse my being personal, but are you knock-kneed
+naturally? Or could you, with an effort, do you think, contrive to give
+yourself less the appearance of a marionette whose strings have become
+loose? Thank you, that is better. These little things appear trivial, I
+know, but, after all, we may as well try and look our best—
+
+“Don’t you like your boots, Private Montmorency? Oh, I beg your pardon.
+I thought from the way you were bending down and looking at them that
+perhaps their appearance was dissatisfying to you. My mistake.
+
+“Are you suffering from indigestion, my poor fellow? Shall I get you a
+little brandy? It isn’t indigestion. Then what’s the matter with it?
+Why are you trying to hide it? It’s nothing to be ashamed of. We’ve all
+got one. Let it come forward man. Let’s see it.”
+
+Having succeeded, with a few such kindly words, in getting his line into
+order, he would proceed to recommend healthy exercise.
+
+“Shoulder arms! Good, gentlemen, very good for a beginning. Yet still,
+if I may be critical, not perfect. There is more in this thing than you
+might imagine, gentlemen. May I point out to Private Henry Thompson that
+a musket carried across the shoulder at right angles is apt to
+inconvenience the gentleman behind. Even from the point of view of his
+own comfort, I feel sure that Private Thompson would do better to follow
+the usual custom in this matter.
+
+“I would also suggest to Private St. Leonard that we are not here to
+practice the art of balancing a heavy musket on the outstretched palm of
+the hand. Private St. Leonard’s performance with the musket is decidedly
+clever. But it is not war.
+
+“Believe me, gentlemen, this thing has been carefully worked out, and no
+improvement is likely to result from individual effort. Let our idea be
+uniformity. It is monotonous, but it is safe. Now, then, gentlemen,
+once again.”
+
+The drill yard would be converted into a source of innocent delight to
+thousands. “Officer and gentleman” would become a phrase of meaning. I
+present the idea, for what it may be worth, with my compliments, to Pall
+Mall.
+
+The fault of the military man is that he studies too much, reads too much
+history, is over reflective. If, instead, he would look about him more
+he would notice that things are changing. Someone has told the British
+military man that Waterloo was won upon the playing fields of Eton. So
+he goes to Eton and plays. One of these days he will be called upon to
+fight another Waterloo: and afterwards—when it is too late—they will
+explain to him that it was won not upon the play field but in the class
+room.
+
+From the mound on the old Waterloo plain one can form a notion of what
+battles, under former conditions, must have been. The other battlefields
+of Europe are rapidly disappearing: useful Dutch cabbages, as Carlyle
+would have pointed out with justifiable satisfaction, hiding the theatre
+of man’s childish folly. You find, generally speaking, cobblers happily
+employed in cobbling shoes, women gossipping cheerfully over the washtub
+on the spot where a hundred years ago, according to the guide-book, a
+thousand men dressed in blue and a thousand men dressed in red rushed
+together like quarrelsome fox-terriers, and worried each other to death.
+
+But the field of Waterloo is little changed. The guide, whose
+grandfather was present at the battle—quite an extraordinary number of
+grandfathers must have fought at Waterloo: there must have been whole
+regiments composed of grandfathers—can point out to you the ground across
+which every charge was delivered, can show you every ridge, still
+existing, behind which the infantry crouched. The whole business was
+began and finished within a space little larger than a square mile. One
+can understand the advantage then to be derived from the perfect moving
+of the military machine; the uses of the echelon, the purposes of the
+linked battalion, the manipulation of centre, left wing and right wing.
+Then it may have been worth while—if war be ever worth the while—which
+grown men of sense are beginning to doubt—to waste two years of a
+soldier’s training, teaching him the goose-step. In the twentieth
+century, teaching soldiers the evolutions of the Thirty Years’ War is
+about as sensible as it would be loading our iron-clads with canvas.
+
+I followed once a company of Volunteers across Blackfriars Bridge on
+their way from Southwark to the Temple. At the bottom of Ludgate Hill
+the commanding officer, a young but conscientious gentleman, ordered
+“Left wheel!” At once the vanguard turned down a narrow alley—I forget
+its name—which would have led the troop into the purlieus of Whitefriars,
+where, in all probability, they would have been lost for ever. The whole
+company had to be halted, right-about-faced, and retired a hundred yards.
+Then the order “Quick march!” was given. The vanguard shot across
+Ludgate Circus, and were making for the Meat Market.
+
+At this point that young commanding officer gave up being a military man
+and talked sense.
+
+“Not that way,” he shouted: “up Fleet Street and through Middle Temple
+Lane.”
+
+Then without further trouble the army of the future went upon its way.
+
+
+
+
+OUGHT STORIES TO BE TRUE?
+
+
+THERE was once upon a time a charming young lady, possessed of much
+taste, who was asked by her anxious parent, the years passing and family
+expenditure not decreasing, which of the numerous and eligible young men
+then paying court to her she liked the best. She replied, that was her
+difficulty; she could not make up her mind which she liked the best.
+They were all so nice. She could not possibly select one to the
+exclusion of all the others. What she would have liked would have been
+to marry the lot; but that, she presumed, was impracticable.
+
+I feel I resemble that young lady, not so much in charm and beauty as in
+indecision of mind, when the question is that of my favourite author or
+my favourite book. It is as if one were asked one’s favourite food.
+There are times when one fancies an egg with one’s tea. On other
+occasions one dreams of a kipper. To-day one clamours for lobsters.
+To-morrow one feels one never wishes to see a lobster again. One
+determines to settle down, for a time, to a diet of bread and milk and
+rice pudding. Asked suddenly to say whether I preferred ices to soup, or
+beef-steak to caviare, I should be completely nonplussed.
+
+There may be readers who care for only one literary diet. I am a person
+of gross appetites, requiring many authors to satisfy me. There are
+moods when the savage strength of the Bronte sisters is companionable to
+me. One rejoices in the unrelieved gloom of “Wuthering Heights,” as in
+the lowering skies of a stormy autumn. Perhaps part of the marvel of the
+book comes from the knowledge that the authoress was a slight, delicate
+young girl. One wonders what her future work would have been, had she
+lived to gain a wider experience of life; or was it well for her fame
+that nature took the pen so soon from her hand? Her suppressed vehemence
+may have been better suited to those tangled Yorkshire byways than to the
+more open, cultivated fields of life.
+
+There is not much similarity between the two books, yet when recalling
+Emily Bronte my thoughts always run on to Olive Schreiner. Here, again,
+was a young girl with the voice of a strong man. Olive Schreiner, more
+fortunate, has lived; but I doubt if she will ever write a book that will
+remind us of her first. “The Story of an African Farm” is not a work to
+be repeated. We have advanced in literature of late. I can well
+remember the storm of indignation with which the “African Farm” was
+received by Mrs. Grundy and her then numerous, but now happily
+diminishing, school. It was a book that was to be kept from the hands of
+every young man and woman. But the hands of the young men and women
+stretched out and grasped it, to their help. It is a curious idea, this
+of Mrs. Grundy’s, that the young man and woman must never think—that all
+literature that does anything more than echo the conventions must be
+hidden away.
+
+Then there are times when I love to gallop through history on Sir
+Walter’s broomstick. At other hours it is pleasant to sit in converse
+with wise George Eliot. From her garden terrace I look down on Loamshire
+and its commonplace people; while in her quiet, deep voice she tells me
+of the hidden hearts that beat and throb beneath these velveteen jackets
+and lace falls.
+
+Who can help loving Thackeray, wittiest, gentlest of men, in spite of the
+faint suspicion of snobbishness that clings to him? There is something
+pathetic in the good man’s horror of this snobbishness, to which he
+himself was a victim. May it not have been an affectation, born
+unconsciously of self-consciousness? His heroes and heroines must needs
+be all fine folk, fit company for lady and gentlemen readers. To him the
+livery was too often the man. Under his stuffed calves even _Jeames de
+la Pluche_ himself stood upon the legs of a man, but Thackeray could
+never see deeper than the silk stockings. Thackeray lived and died in
+Clubland. One feels that the world was bounded for him by Temple Bar on
+the east and Park Lane on the west; but what there was good in Clubland
+he showed us, and for the sake of the great gentlemen and sweet ladies
+that his kindly eyes found in that narrow region, not too overpeopled
+with great gentlemen and sweet women, let us honour him.
+
+“Tom Jones,” “Peregrine Pickle,” and “Tristram Shandy” are books a man is
+the better for reading, if he read them wisely. They teach him that
+literature, to be a living force, must deal with all sides of life, and
+that little help comes to us from that silly pretence of ours that we are
+perfect in all things, leading perfect lives, that only the villain of
+the story ever deviates from the path of rectitude.
+
+This is a point that needs to be considered by both the makers and the
+buyers of stories. If literature is to be regarded solely as the
+amusement of an idle hour, then the less relationship it has to life the
+better. Looking into a truthful mirror of nature we are compelled to
+think; and when thought comes in at the window self-satisfaction goes out
+by the door. Should a novel or play call us to ponder upon the problems
+of existence, or lure us from the dusty high road of the world, for a
+while, into the pleasant meadows of dreamland? If only the latter, then
+let our heroes and our heroines be not what men and women are, but what
+they should be. Let Angelina be always spotless and Edwin always true.
+Let virtue ever triumph over villainy in the last chapter; and let us
+assume that the marriage service answers all the questions of the Sphinx.
+
+Very pleasant are these fairy tales where the prince is always brave and
+handsome; where the princess is always the best and most beautiful
+princess that ever lived; where one knows the wicked people at a glance
+by their ugliness and ill-temper, mistakes being thus rendered
+impossible; where the good fairies are, by nature, more powerful than the
+bad; where gloomy paths lead ever to fair palaces; where the dragon is
+ever vanquished; and where well-behaved husbands and wives can rely upon
+living happily ever afterwards. “The world is too much with us, late and
+soon.” It is wise to slip away from it at times to fairyland. But,
+alas, we cannot live in fairyland, and knowledge of its geography is of
+little help to us on our return to the rugged country of reality.
+
+Are not both branches of literature needful? By all means let us dream,
+on midsummer nights, of fond lovers led through devious paths to
+happiness by Puck; of virtuous dukes—one finds such in fairyland; of fate
+subdued by faith and gentleness. But may we not also, in our more
+serious humours, find satisfaction in thinking with Hamlet or Coriolanus?
+May not both Dickens and Zola have their booths in Vanity Fair? If
+literature is to be a help to us, as well as a pastime, it must deal with
+the ugly as well as with the beautiful; it must show us ourselves, not as
+we wish to appear, but as we know ourselves to be. Man has been
+described as a animal with aspirations reaching up to Heaven and
+instincts rooted—elsewhere. Is literature to flatter him, or reveal him
+to himself?
+
+Of living writers it is not safe, I suppose, to speak except, perhaps, of
+those who have been with us so long that we have come to forget they are
+not of the past. Has justice ever been done to Ouida’s undoubted genius
+by our shallow school of criticism, always very clever in discovering
+faults as obvious as pimples on a fine face? Her guardsmen “toy” with
+their food. Her horses win the Derby three years running. Her wicked
+women throw guinea peaches from the windows of the Star and Garter into
+the Thames at Richmond. The distance being about three hundred and fifty
+yards, it is a good throw. Well, well, books are not made worth reading
+by the absence of absurdities. Ouida possesses strength, tenderness,
+truth, passion; and these be qualities in a writer capable of carrying
+many more faults than Ouida is burdened with. But that is the method of
+our little criticism. It views an artist as Gulliver saw the Brobdingnag
+ladies. It is too small to see them in their entirety: a mole or a wart
+absorbs all its vision.
+
+Why was not George Gissing more widely read? If faithfulness to life
+were the key to literary success, Gissing’s sales would have been counted
+by the million instead of by the hundred.
+
+Have Mark Twain’s literary qualities, apart altogether from his humour,
+been recognised in literary circles as they ought to have been? “Huck
+Finn” would be a great work were there not a laugh in it from cover to
+cover. Among the Indians and some other savage tribes the fact that a
+member of the community has lost one of his senses makes greatly to his
+advantage; he is then regarded as a superior person. So among a school
+of Anglo-Saxon readers, it is necessary to a man, if he would gain
+literary credit, that he should lack the sense of humour. One or two
+curious modern examples occur to me of literary success secured chiefly
+by this failing.
+
+All these authors are my favourites; but such catholic taste is held
+nowadays to be no taste. One is told that if one loves Shakespeare, one
+must of necessity hate Ibsen; that one cannot appreciate Wagner and
+tolerate Beethoven; that if we admit any merit in Dore, we are incapable
+of understanding Whistler. How can I say which is my favourite novel? I
+can only ask myself which lives clearest in my memory, which is the book
+I run to more often than to another in that pleasant half hour before the
+dinner-bell, when, with all apologies to good Mr. Smiles, it is useless
+to think of work.
+
+I find, on examination, that my “David Copperfield” is more dilapidated
+than any other novel upon my shelves. As I turn its dog-eared pages,
+reading the familiar headlines “Mr. Micawber in difficulties,” “Mr.
+Micawber in prison,” “I fall in love with Dora,” “Mr. Barkis goes out
+with the tide,” “My child wife,” “Traddles in a nest of roses”—pages of
+my own life recur to me; so many of my sorrows, so many of my joys are
+woven in my mind with this chapter or the other. That day—how well I
+remember it when I read of “David’s” wooing, but Dora’s death I was
+careful to skip. Poor, pretty little Mrs. Copperfield at the gate,
+holding up her baby in her arms, is always associated in my memory with a
+child’s cry, long listened for. I found the book, face downwards on a
+chair, weeks afterwards, not moved from where I had hastily laid it.
+
+Old friends, all of you, how many times have I not slipped away from my
+worries into your pleasant company! Peggotty, you dear soul, the sight
+of your kind eyes is so good to me. Our mutual friend, Mr. Charles
+Dickens, is prone, we know, just ever so slightly to gush. Good fellow
+that he is, he can see no flaw in those he loves, but you, dear lady, if
+you will permit me to call you by a name much abused, he has drawn in
+true colours. I know you well, with your big heart, your quick temper,
+your homely, human ways of thought. You yourself will never guess your
+worth—how much the world is better for such as you! You think of
+yourself as of a commonplace person, useful only for the making of
+pastry, the darning of stockings, and if a man—not a young man, with only
+dim half-opened eyes, but a man whom life had made keen to see the beauty
+that lies hidden beneath plain faces—were to kneel and kiss your red,
+coarse hand, you would be much astonished. But he would be a wise man,
+Peggotty, knowing what things a man should take carelessly, and for what
+things he should thank God, who has fashioned fairness in many forms.
+
+Mr. Wilkins Micawber, and you, most excellent of faithful wives, Mrs.
+Emma Micawber, to you I also raise my hat. How often has the example of
+your philosophy saved me, when I, likewise, have suffered under the
+temporary pressure of pecuniary liabilities; when the sun of my
+prosperity, too, has sunk beneath the dark horizon of the world—in short,
+when I, also, have found myself in a tight corner. I have asked myself
+what would the Micawbers have done in my place. And I have answered
+myself. They would have sat down to a dish of lamb’s fry, cooked and
+breaded by the deft hands of Emma, followed by a brew of punch, concocted
+by the beaming Wilkins, and have forgotten all their troubles, for the
+time being. Whereupon, seeing first that sufficient small change was in
+my pocket, I have entered the nearest restaurant, and have treated myself
+to a repast of such sumptuousness as the aforesaid small change would
+command, emerging from that restaurant stronger and more fit for battle.
+And lo! the sun of my prosperity has peeped at me from over the clouds
+with a sly wink, as if to say “Cheer up; I am only round the corner.”
+
+Cheery, elastic Mr. and Mrs. Micawber, how would half the world face
+their fate but by the help of a kindly, shallow nature such as yours? I
+love to think that your sorrows can be drowned in nothing more harmful
+than a bowl of punch. Here’s to you, Emma, and to you, Wilkins, and to
+the twins!
+
+May you and such childlike folk trip lightly over the stones upon your
+path! May something ever turn up for you, my dears! May the rain of
+life ever fall as April showers upon your simple bald head, Micawber!
+
+And you, sweet Dora, let me confess I love you, though sensible friends
+deem you foolish. Ah, silly Dora, fashioned by wise Mother Nature who
+knows that weakness and helplessness are as a talisman calling forth
+strength and tenderness in man, trouble yourself not unduly about the
+oysters and the underdone mutton, little woman. Good plain cooks at
+twenty pounds a year will see to these things for us. Your work is to
+teach us gentleness and kindness. Lay your foolish curls just here,
+child. It is from such as you we learn wisdom. Foolish wise folk sneer
+at you. Foolish wise folk would pull up the laughing lilies, the
+needless roses from the garden, would plant in their places only useful,
+wholesome cabbage. But the gardener, knowing better, plants the silly,
+short-lived flowers, foolish wise folk asking for what purpose.
+
+Gallant Traddles, of the strong heart and the unruly hair; Sophy, dearest
+of girls; Betsy Trotwood, with your gentlemanly manners and your woman’s
+heart, you have come to me in shabby rooms, making the dismal place seem
+bright. In dark hours your kindly faces have looked out at me from the
+shadows, your kindly voices have cheered me.
+
+Little Em’ly and Agnes, it may be my bad taste, but I cannot share my
+friend Dickens’ enthusiasm for them. Dickens’ good women are all too
+good for human nature’s daily food. Esther Summerson, Florence Dombey,
+Little Nell—you have no faults to love you by.
+
+Scott’s women were likewise mere illuminated texts. Scott only drew one
+live heroine—Catherine Seton. His other women were merely the prizes the
+hero had to win in the end, like the sucking pig or the leg of mutton for
+which the yokel climbs the greasy pole. That Dickens could draw a woman
+to some likeness he proved by Bella Wilfer, and Estella in “Great
+Expectations.” But real women have never been popular in fiction. Men
+readers prefer the false, and women readers object to the truth.
+
+From an artistic point of view, “David Copperfield” is undoubtedly
+Dickens’ best work. Its humour is less boisterous; its pathos less
+highly coloured.
+
+One of Leech’s pictures represents a cab-man calmly sleeping in the
+gutter.
+
+“Oh, poor dear, he’s ill,” says a tender-hearted lady in the crowd.
+“Ill!” retorts a male bystander indignantly, “Ill! ’E’s ’ad too much of
+what I ain’t ’ad enough of.”
+
+Dickens suffered from too little of what some of us have too much
+of—criticism. His work met with too little resistance to call forth his
+powers. Too often his pathos sinks to bathos, and this not from want of
+skill, but from want of care. It is difficult to believe that the
+popular writer who allowed his sentimentality—or rather the public’s
+sentimentality—to run away with him in such scenes as the death of Paul
+Dombey and Little Nell was the artist who painted the death of Sidney
+Carton and of Barkis, the willing. The death of Barkis, next to the
+passing of Colonel Newcome, is, to my thinking, one of the most perfect
+pieces of pathos in English literature. No very deep emotion is
+concerned. He is a commonplace old man, clinging foolishly to a
+commonplace box. His simple wife and the old boatmen stand by, waiting
+calmly for the end. There is no straining after effect. One feels death
+enter, dignifying all things; and touched by that hand, foolish old
+Barkis grows great.
+
+In Uriah Heap and Mrs. Gummidge, Dickens draws types rather than
+characters. Pecksniff, Podsnap, Dolly Varden, Mr. Bumble, Mrs. Gamp,
+Mark Tapley, Turveydrop, Mrs. Jellyby—these are not characters; they are
+human characteristics personified.
+
+We have to go back to Shakespeare to find a writer who, through fiction,
+has so enriched the thought of the people. Admit all Dickens’ faults
+twice over, we still have one of the greatest writers of modern times.
+Such people as these creations of Dickens never lived, says your little
+critic. Nor was Prometheus, type of the spirit of man, nor was Niobe,
+mother of all mothers, a truthful picture of the citizen one was likely
+to meet often during a morning’s stroll through Athens. Nor grew there
+ever a wood like to the Forest of Arden, though every Rosalind and
+Orlando knows the path to glades having much resemblance thereto.
+
+Steerforth, upon whom Dickens evidently prided himself, I must confess,
+never laid hold of me. He is a melodramatic young man. The worst I
+could have wished him would have been that he should marry Rose Dartle
+and live with his mother. It would have served him right for being so
+attractive. Old Peggotty and Ham are, of course, impossible. One must
+accept them also as types. These Brothers Cheeryble, these Kits, Joe
+Gargeries, Boffins, Garlands, John Peerybingles, we will accept as types
+of the goodness that is in men—though in real life the amount of virtue
+that Dickens often wastes upon a single individual would by more
+economically minded nature, be made to serve for fifty.
+
+To sum up, “David Copperfield” is a plain tale, simply told; and such are
+all books that live. Eccentricities of style, artistic trickery, may
+please the critic of a day, but literature is a story that interests us,
+boys and girls, men and women. It is a sad book; and that, again, gives
+it an added charm in these sad later days. Humanity is nearing its old
+age, and we have come to love sadness, as the friend who has been longest
+with us. In the young days of our vigour we were merry. With Ulysses’
+boatmen, we took alike the sunshine and the thunder with frolic welcome.
+The red blood flowed in our veins, and we laughed, and our tales were of
+strength and hope. Now we sit like old men, watching faces in the fire;
+and the stories that we love are sad stories—like the stories we
+ourselves have lived.
+
+
+
+
+CREATURES THAT ONE DAY SHALL BE MEN.
+
+
+I OUGHT to like Russia better than I do, if only for the sake of the many
+good friends I am proud to possess amongst the Russians. A large square
+photograph I keep always on my mantel-piece; it helps me to maintain my
+head at that degree of distention necessary for the performance of all
+literary work. It presents in the centre a neatly-written address in
+excellent English that I frankly confess I am never tired of reading,
+around which are ranged some hundreds of names I am quite unable to read,
+but which, in spite of their strange lettering, I know to be the names of
+good Russian men and women to whom, a year or two ago, occurred the
+kindly idea of sending me as a Christmas card this message of
+encouragement. The individual Russian is one of the most charming
+creatures living. If he like you he does not hesitate to let you know
+it; not only by every action possible, but, by what perhaps is just as
+useful in this grey old world, by generous, impulsive speech.
+
+We Anglo-Saxons are apt to pride ourselves upon being undemonstrative.
+Max Adeler tells the tale of a boy who was sent out by his father to
+fetch wood. The boy took the opportunity of disappearing and did not
+show his face again beneath the paternal roof for over twenty years.
+Then one evening, a smiling, well-dressed stranger entered to the old
+couple, and announced himself as their long-lost child, returned at last.
+
+“Well, you haven’t hurried yourself,” grumbled the old man, “and blarm me
+if now you haven’t forgotten the wood.”
+
+I was lunching with an Englishman in a London restaurant one day. A man
+entered and took his seat at a table near by. Glancing round, and
+meeting my friend’s eyes, he smiled and nodded.
+
+“Excuse me a minute,” said my friend, “I must just speak to my
+brother—haven’t seen him for over five years.”
+
+He finished his soup and leisurely wiped his moustache before strolling
+across and shaking hands. They talked for a while. Then my friend
+returned to me.
+
+“Never thought to see him again,” observed my friend, “he was one of the
+garrison of that place in Africa—what’s the name of it?—that the Mahdi
+attacked. Only three of them escaped. Always was a lucky beggar, Jim.”
+
+“But wouldn’t you like to talk to him some more?” I suggested; “I can see
+you any time about this little business of ours.”
+
+“Oh, that’s all right,” he answered, “we have just fixed it up—shall be
+seeing him again to-morrow.”
+
+I thought of this scene one evening while dining with some Russian
+friends in a St. Petersburg Hotel. One of the party had not seen his
+second cousin, a mining engineer, for nearly eighteen months. They sat
+opposite to one another, and a dozen times at least during the course of
+the dinner one of them would jump up from his chair, and run round to
+embrace the other. They would throw their arms about one another,
+kissing one another on both cheeks, and then sit down again, with moist
+eyes. Their behaviour among their fellow countrymen excited no
+astonishment whatever.
+
+But the Russians’s anger is as quick and vehement as his love. On
+another occasion I was supping with friends in one of the chief
+restaurants on the Nevsky. Two gentlemen at an adjoining table, who up
+till the previous moment had been engaged in amicable conversation,
+suddenly sprang to their feet, and “went for” one another. One man
+secured the water-bottle, which he promptly broke over the other’s head.
+His opponent chose for his weapon a heavy mahogany chair, and leaping
+back for the purpose of securing a good swing, lurched against my
+hostess.
+
+“Do please be careful,” said the lady.
+
+“A thousand pardons, madame,” returned the stranger, from whom blood and
+water were streaming in equal copiousness; and taking the utmost care to
+avoid interfering with our comfort, he succeeded adroitly in flooring his
+antagonist by a well-directed blow.
+
+A policeman appeared upon the scene. He did not attempt to interfere,
+but running out into the street communicated the glad tidings to another
+policeman.
+
+“This is going to cost them a pretty penny,” observed my host, who was
+calmly continuing his supper; “why couldn’t they wait?”
+
+It did cost them a pretty penny. Some half a dozen policemen were round
+about before as many minutes had elapsed, and each one claimed his bribe.
+Then they wished both combatants good-night, and trooped out evidently in
+great good humour and the two gentlemen, with wet napkins round their
+heads, sat down again, and laughter and amicable conversation flowed
+freely as before.
+
+They strike the stranger as a childlike people, but you are possessed
+with a haunting sense of ugly traits beneath. The workers—slaves it
+would be almost more correct to call them—allow themselves to be
+exploited with the uncomplaining patience of intelligent animals. Yet
+every educated Russian you talk to on the subject knows that revolution
+is coming.
+
+But he talks to you about it with the door shut, for no man in Russia can
+be sure that his own servants are not police spies. I was discussing
+politics with a Russian official one evening in his study when his old
+housekeeper entered the room—a soft-eyed grey-haired woman who had been
+in his service over eight years, and whose position in the household was
+almost that of a friend. He stopped abruptly and changed the
+conversation. So soon as the door was closed behind her again, he
+explained himself.
+
+“It is better to chat upon such matters when one is quite alone,” he
+laughed.
+
+“But surely you can trust her,” I said, “She appears to be devoted to you
+all.”
+
+“It is safer to trust no one,” he answered. And then he continued from
+the point where we had been interrupted.
+
+“It is gathering,” he said; “there are times when I almost smell blood in
+the air. I am an old man and may escape it, but my children will have to
+suffer—suffer as children must for the sins of their fathers. We have
+made brute beasts of the people, and as brute beasts they will come upon
+us, cruel, and undiscriminating; right and wrong indifferently going down
+before them. But it has to be. It is needed.”
+
+It is a mistake to speak of the Russian classes opposing to all progress
+a dead wall of selfishness. The history of Russia will be the history of
+the French Revolution over again, but with this difference: that the
+educated classes, the thinkers, who are pushing forward the dumb masses
+are doing so with their eyes open. There will be no Maribeau, no Danton
+to be appalled at a people’s ingratitude. The men who are to-day working
+for revolution in Russia number among their ranks statesmen, soldiers,
+delicately-nurtured women, rich landowners, prosperous tradesmen,
+students familiar with the lessons of history. They have no
+misconceptions concerning the blind Monster into which they are breathing
+life. He will crush them, they know it; but with them he will crush the
+injustice and stupidity they have grown to hate more than they love
+themselves.
+
+The Russian peasant, when he rises, will prove more terrible, more
+pitiless than were the men of 1790. He is less intelligent, more brutal.
+They sing a wild, sad song, these Russian cattle, the while they work.
+They sing it in chorus on the quays while hauling the cargo, they sing it
+in the factory, they chant on the weary, endless steppes, reaping the
+corn they may not eat. It is of the good time their masters are having,
+of the feastings and the merrymakings, of the laughter of the children,
+of the kisses of the lovers.
+
+But the last line of every verse is the same. When you ask a Russian to
+translate it for you he shrugs his shoulders.
+
+“Oh, it means,” he says, “that their time will also come—some day.”
+
+It is a pathetic, haunting refrain. They sing it in the drawing-rooms of
+Moscow and St. Petersburg, and somehow the light talk and laughter die
+away, and a hush, like a chill breath, enters by the closed door and
+passes through. It is a curious song, like the wailing of a tired wind,
+and one day it will sweep over the land heralding terror.
+
+A Scotsman I met in Russia told me that when he first came out to act as
+manager of a large factory in St. Petersburg, belonging to his Scottish
+employers, he unwittingly made a mistake the first week when paying his
+workpeople. By a miscalculation of the Russian money he paid the men,
+each one, nearly a rouble short. He discovered his error before the
+following Saturday, and then put the matter right. The men accepted his
+explanation with perfect composure and without any comment whatever. The
+thing astonished him.
+
+“But you must have known I was paying you short,” he said to one of them.
+“Why didn’t you tell me of it?”
+
+“Oh,” answered the man, “we thought you were putting it in your own
+pocket and then if we had complained it would have meant dismissal for
+us. No one would have taken our word against yours.”
+
+Corruption appears to be so general throughout the whole of Russia that
+all classes have come to accept it as part of the established order of
+things. A friend gave me a little dog to bring away with me. It was a
+valuable animal, and I wished to keep it with me. It is strictly
+forbidden to take dogs into railway carriages. The list of the pains and
+penalties for doing so frightened me considerably.
+
+“Oh, that will be all right,” my friend assured me; “have a few roubles
+loose in your pocket.”
+
+I tipped the station master and I tipped the guard, and started pleased
+with myself. But I had not anticipated what was in store for me. The
+news that an Englishman with a dog in a basket and roubles in his pocket
+was coming must have been telegraphed all down the line. At almost every
+stopping-place some enormous official, wearing generally a sword and a
+helmet, boarded the train. At first these fellows terrified me. I took
+them for field-marshals at least.
+
+Visions of Siberia crossed my mind. Anxious and trembling, I gave the
+first one a gold piece. He shook me warmly by the hand—I thought he was
+going to kiss me. If I had offered him my cheek I am sure he would have
+done so. With the next one I felt less apprehensive. For a couple of
+roubles he blessed me, so I gathered; and, commending me to the care of
+the Almighty, departed. Before I had reached the German frontier, I was
+giving away the equivalent of English sixpences to men with the dress and
+carriage of major-generals; and to see their faces brighten up and to
+receive their heartfelt benediction was well worth the money.
+
+But to the man without roubles in his pocket, Russian officialdom is not
+so gracious. By the expenditure of a few more coins I got my dog through
+the Customs without trouble, and had leisure to look about me. A
+miserable object was being badgered by half a dozen men in uniform, and
+he—his lean face puckered up into a snarl—was returning them snappish
+answers; the whole scene suggested some half-starved mongrel being
+worried by school-boys. A slight informality had been discovered in his
+passport, so a fellow traveller with whom I had made friends informed me.
+He had no roubles in his pocket, and in consequence they were sending him
+back to St. Petersburg—some eighteen hours’ journey—in a wagon that in
+England would not be employed for the transport of oxen.
+
+It seemed a good joke to Russian officialdom; they would drop in every
+now and then, look at him as he sat crouched in a corner of the
+waiting-room, and pass out again, laughing. The snarl had died from his
+face; a dull, listless indifference had taken its place—the look one sees
+on the face of a beaten dog, after the beating is over, when it is lying
+very still, its great eyes staring into nothingness, and one wonders
+whether it is thinking.
+
+The Russian worker reads no newspaper, has no club, yet all things seem
+to be known to him. There is a prison on the banks of the Neva, in St.
+Petersburg. They say such things are done with now, but up till very
+recently there existed a small cell therein, below the level of the ice,
+and prisoners placed there would be found missing a day or two
+afterwards, nothing ever again known of them, except, perhaps, to the
+fishes of the Baltic. They talk of such like things among themselves:
+the sleigh-drivers round their charcoal fire, the field-workers going and
+coming in the grey dawn, the factory workers, their whispers deadened by
+the rattle of the looms.
+
+I was searching for a house in Brussels some winters ago, and there was
+one I was sent to in a small street leading out of the Avenue Louise. It
+was poorly furnished, but rich in pictures, large and small. They
+covered the walls of every room.
+
+“These pictures,” explained to me the landlady, an old, haggard-looking
+woman, “will not be left, I am taking them with me to London. They are
+all the work of my husband. He is arranging an exhibition.”
+
+The friend who had sent me had told me the woman was a widow, who had
+been living in Brussels eking out a precarious existence as a
+lodging-house keeper for the last ten years.
+
+“You have married again?” I questioned her.
+
+The woman smiled.
+
+“Not again. I was married eighteen years ago in Russia. My husband was
+transported to Siberia a few days after we were married, and I have never
+seen him since.”
+
+“I should have followed him,” she added, “only every year we thought he
+was going to be set free.”
+
+“He is really free now?” I asked.
+
+“Yes,” she answered. “They set him free last week. He will join me in
+London. We shall be able to finish our honeymoon.”
+
+She smiled, revealing to me that once she had been a girl.
+
+I read in the English papers of the exhibition in London. It was said
+the artist showed much promise. So possibly a career may at last be
+opening out for him.
+
+Nature has made life hard to Russian rich and poor alike. To the banks
+of the Neva, with its ague and influenza-bestowing fogs and mists, one
+imagines that the Devil himself must have guided Peter the Great.
+
+“Show me in all my dominions the most hopelessly unattractive site on
+which to build a city,” Peter must have prayed; and the Devil having
+discovered the site on which St. Petersburg now stands, must have
+returned to his master in high good feather.
+
+“I think, my dear Peter, I have found you something really unique. It is
+a pestilent swamp to which a mighty river brings bitter blasts and
+marrow-chilling fogs, while during the brief summer time the wind will
+bring you sand. In this way you will combine the disadvantages of the
+North Pole with those of the desert of Sahara.”
+
+In the winter time the Russians light their great stoves, and doubly
+barricade their doors and windows; and in this atmosphere, like to that
+of a greenhouse, many of their women will pass six months, never
+venturing out of doors. Even the men only go out at intervals. Every
+office, every shop is an oven. Men of forty have white hair and
+parchment faces; and the women are old at thirty. The farm labourers,
+during the few summer months, work almost entirely without sleep. They
+leave that for the winter, when they shut themselves up like dormice in
+their hovels, their store of food and vodka buried underneath the floor.
+For days together they sleep, then wake and dig, then sleep again.
+
+The Russian party lasts all night. In an adjoining room are beds and
+couches; half a dozen guests are always sleeping. An hour contents them,
+then they rejoin the company, and other guests take their places. The
+Russian eats when he feels so disposed; the table is always spread, the
+guests come and go. Once a year there is a great feast in Moscow. The
+Russian merchant and his friends sit down early in the day, and a sort of
+thick, sweet pancake is served up hot. The feast continues for many
+hours, and the ambition of the Russian merchant is to eat more than his
+neighbour. Fifty or sixty of these hot cakes a man will consume at a
+sitting, and a dozen funerals in Moscow is often the result.
+
+An uncivilised people, we call them in our lordly way, but they are
+young. Russian history is not yet three hundred years old. They will
+see us out, I am inclined to think. Their energy, their
+intelligence—when these show above the groundwork—are monstrous. I have
+known a Russian learn Chinese within six months. English! they learn it
+while you are talking to them. The children play at chess and study the
+violin for their own amusement.
+
+The world will be glad of Russia—when she has put her house in order.
+
+
+
+
+HOW TO BE HAPPY THOUGH LITTLE.
+
+
+FOLKS suffering from Jingoism, Spreadeagleism, Chauvinism—all such like
+isms, to whatever country they belong—would be well advised to take a
+tour in Holland. It is the idea of the moment that size spells
+happiness. The bigger the country the better one is for living there.
+The happiest Frenchman cannot possibly be as happy as the most wretched
+Britisher, for the reason that Britain owns many more thousands of square
+miles than France possesses. The Swiss peasant, compared with the
+Russian serf, must, when he looks at the map of Europe and Asia, feel
+himself to be a miserable creature. The reason that everybody in America
+is happy and good is to be explained by the fact that America has an area
+equal to that of the entire moon. The American citizen who has backed
+the wrong horse, missed his train and lost his bag, remembers this and
+feels bucked up again.
+
+According to this argument, fishes should be the happiest of mortals, the
+sea consisting—at least, so says my atlas: I have not measured it
+myself—of a hundred and forty-four millions of square miles. But, maybe,
+the sea is also divided in ways we wot not of. Possibly the sardine who
+lives near the Brittainy coast is sad and discontented because the
+Norwegian sardine is the proud inhabitant of a larger sea. Perhaps that
+is why he has left the Brittainy coast. Ashamed of being a Brittainy
+sardine, he has emigrated to Norway, has become a naturalized Norwegian
+sardine, and is himself again.
+
+The happy Londoner on foggy days can warm himself with the reflection
+that the sun never sets on the British Empire. He does not often see the
+sun, but that is a mere detail. He regards himself as the owner of the
+sun; the sun begins his little day in the British Empire, ends his little
+day in the British Empire: for all practical purposes the sun is part of
+the British Empire. Foolish people in other countries sit underneath it
+and feel warm, but that is only their ignorance. They do not know it is
+a British possession; if they did they would feel cold.
+
+My views on this subject are, I know, heretical. I cannot get it into my
+unpatriotic head that size is the only thing worth worrying about. In
+England, when I venture to express my out-of-date opinions, I am called a
+Little Englander. It fretted me at first; I was becoming a mere shadow.
+But by now I have got used to it. It would be the same, I feel, wherever
+I went. In New York I should be a Little American; in Constantinople a
+Little Turk. But I wanted to talk about Holland. A holiday in Holland
+serves as a corrective to exaggerated Imperialistic notions.
+
+There are no poor in Holland. They may be an unhappy people, knowing
+what a little country it is they live in; but, if so, they hide the fact.
+To all seeming, the Dutch peasant, smoking his great pipe, is as much a
+man as the Whitechapel hawker or the moocher of the Paris boulevard. I
+saw a beggar once in Holland—in the townlet of Enkhuisen. Crowds were
+hurrying up from the side streets to have a look at him; the idea at
+first seemed to be that he was doing it for a bet. He turned out to be a
+Portuguese. They offered him work in the docks—until he could get
+something better to do—at wages equal in English money to about ten
+shillings a day. I inquired about him on my way back, and was told he
+had borrowed a couple of forms from the foreman and had left by the
+evening train. It is not the country for the loafer.
+
+In Holland work is easily found; this takes away the charm of looking for
+it. A farm labourer in Holland lives in a brick-built house of six
+rooms, which generally belongs to him, with an acre or so of ground, and
+only eats meat once a day. The rest of his time he fills up on eggs and
+chicken and cheese and beer. But you rarely hear him grumble. His wife
+and daughter may be seen on Sundays wearing gold and silver jewellery
+worth from fifty to one hundred pounds, and there is generally enough old
+delft and pewter in the house to start a local museum anywhere outside
+Holland. On high days and holidays, of which in Holland there are
+plenty, the average Dutch _vrouw_ would be well worth running away with.
+The Dutch peasant girl has no need of an illustrated journal once a week
+to tell her what the fashion is; she has it in the portrait of her
+mother, or of her grandmother, hanging over the glittering chimney-piece.
+
+When the Dutchwoman builds a dress she builds it to last; it descends
+from mother to daughter, but it is made of sound material in the
+beginning. A lady friend of mine thought the Dutch costume would serve
+well for a fancy-dress ball, so set about buying one, but abandoned the
+notion on learning what it would cost her. A Dutch girl in her Sunday
+clothes must be worth fifty pounds before you come to ornaments. In
+certain provinces she wears a close-fitting helmet, made either of solid
+silver or of solid gold. The Dutch gallant, before making himself known,
+walks on tiptoe a little while behind the Loved One, and looks at himself
+in her head-dress just to make sure that his hat is on straight and his
+front curl just where it ought to be.
+
+In most other European countries national costume is dying out. The
+slop-shop is year by year extending its hideous trade. But the country
+of Rubens and Rembrandt, of Teniers and Gerard Dow, remains still true to
+art. The picture post-card does not exaggerate. The men in those
+wondrous baggy knickerbockers, from the pockets of which you sometimes
+see a couple of chicken’s heads protruding; in gaudy coloured shirts, in
+worsted hose and mighty sabots, smoking their great pipes—the women in
+their petticoats of many hues, in gorgeously embroidered vest, in
+chemisette of dazzling white, crowned with a halo of many frills,
+glittering in gold and silver—are not the creatures of an artist’s fancy.
+You meet them in their thousands on holiday afternoons, walking gravely
+arm in arm, flirting with sober Dutch stolidity.
+
+On colder days the women wear bright-coloured capes made of fine spun
+silk, from underneath the ample folds of which you sometimes hear a
+little cry; and sometimes a little hooded head peeps out, regards with
+preternatural thoughtfulness the toy-like world without, then dives back
+into shelter. As for the children—women in miniature, the single
+difference in dress being the gay pinafore—you can only say of them that
+they look like Dutch dolls. But such plump, contented, cheerful little
+dolls! You remember the hollow-eyed, pale-faced dolls you see swarming
+in the great, big and therefore should be happy countries, and wish that
+mere land surface were of less importance to our statesmen and our able
+editors, and the happiness and well-being of the mere human items worth a
+little more of their thought.
+
+The Dutch peasant lives surrounded by canals, and reaches his cottage
+across a drawbridge. I suppose it is in the blood of the Dutch child not
+to tumble into a canal, and the Dutch mother never appears to anticipate
+such possibility. One can imagine the average English mother trying to
+bring up a family in a house surrounded by canals. She would never have
+a minute’s peace until the children were in bed. But then the mere sight
+of a canal to the English child suggests the delights of a sudden and
+unexpected bath. I put it to a Dutchman once. Did the Dutch child by
+any chance ever fall into a canal?
+
+“Yes,” he replied, “cases have been known.”
+
+“Don’t you do anything for it?” I enquired.
+
+“Oh, yes,” he answered, “we haul them out again.”
+
+“But what I mean is,” I explained, “don’t you do anything to prevent
+their falling in—to save them from falling in again?”
+
+“Yes,” he answered, “we spank ’em.”
+
+There is always a wind in Holland; it comes from over the sea. There is
+nothing to stay its progress. It leaps the low dykes and sweeps with a
+shriek across the sad, soft dunes, and thinks it is going to have a good
+time and play havoc in the land. But the Dutchman laughs behind his
+great pipe as it comes to him shouting and roaring. “Welcome, my hearty,
+welcome,” he chuckles, “come blustering and bragging; the bigger you are
+the better I like you.” And when it is once in the land, behind the
+long, straight dykes, behind the waving line of sandy dunes, he seizes
+hold of it, and will not let it go till it has done its tale of work.
+
+The wind is the Dutchman’s; servant before he lets it loose again it has
+turned ten thousand mills, has pumped the water and sawn the wood, has
+lighted the town and worked the loom, and forged the iron, and driven the
+great, slow, silent wherry, and played with the children in the garden.
+It is a sober wind when it gets back to sea, worn and weary, leaving the
+Dutchman laughing behind his everlasting pipe. There are canals in
+Holland down which you pass as though a field of wind-blown corn; a soft,
+low, rustling murmur ever in your ears. It is the ceaseless whirl of the
+great mill sails. Far out at sea the winds are as foolish savages,
+fighting, shrieking, tearing—purposeless. Here, in the street of mills,
+it is a civilized wind, crooning softly while it labours.
+
+What charms one in Holland is the neatness and cleanliness of all about
+one. Maybe to the Dutchman there are drawbacks. In a Dutch household
+life must be one long spring-cleaning. No milk-pail is considered fit
+that cannot just as well be used for a looking-glass. The great brass
+pans, hanging under the pent house roof outside the cottage door, flash
+like burnished gold. You could eat your dinner off the red-tiled floor,
+but that the deal table, scrubbed to the colour of cream cheese, is more
+convenient. By each threshold stands a row of empty sabots, and
+woe-betide the Dutchman who would dream of crossing it in anything but
+his stockinged feet.
+
+There is a fashion in sabots. Every spring they are freshly painted.
+One district fancies an orange yellow, another a red, a third white,
+suggesting purity and innocence. Members of the Smart Set indulge in
+ornamentation; a frieze in pink, a star upon the toe. Walking in sabots
+is not as easy as it looks. Attempting to run in sabots I do not
+recommend to the beginner.
+
+“How do you run in sabots?” I asked a Dutchman once. I had been
+experimenting, and had hurt myself.
+
+“We don’t run,” answered the Dutchman.
+
+And observation has proved to me he was right. The Dutch boy, when he
+runs, puts them for preference on his hands, and hits other Dutch boys
+over the head with them as he passes.
+
+The roads in Holland, straight and level, and shaded all the way with
+trees, look, from the railway-carriage window, as if they would be good
+for cycling; but this is a delusion. I crossed in the boat from Harwich
+once, with a well-known black and white artist, and an equally well-known
+and highly respected humorist. They had their bicycles with them,
+intending to tour Holland. I met them a fortnight later in Delft, or,
+rather, I met their remains. I was horrified at first. I thought it was
+drink. They could not stand still, they could not sit still, they
+trembled and shook in every limb, their teeth chattered when they tried
+to talk. The humorist hadn’t a joke left in him. The artist could not
+have drawn his own salary; he would have dropped it on the way to his
+pocket. The Dutch roads are paved their entire length with cobbles—big,
+round cobbles, over which your bicycle leaps and springs and plunges.
+
+If you would see Holland outside the big towns a smattering of Dutch is
+necessary. If you know German there is not much difficulty. Dutch—I
+speak as an amateur—appears to be very bad German mis-pronounced.
+Myself, I find my German goes well in Holland, even better than in
+Germany. The Anglo-Saxon should not attempt the Dutch G. It is hopeless
+to think of succeeding, and the attempt has been known to produce
+internal rupture. The Dutchman appears to keep his G in his stomach, and
+to haul it up when wanted. Myself, I find the ordinary G, preceded by a
+hiccough and followed by a sob, the nearest I can get to it. But they
+tell me it is not quite right, yet.
+
+One needs to save up beforehand if one desires to spend any length of
+time in Holland. One talks of dear old England, but the dearest land in
+all the world is little Holland. The florin there is equal to the franc
+in France and to the shilling in England. They tell you that cigars are
+cheap in Holland. A cheap Dutch cigar will last you a day. It is not
+until you have forgotten the taste of it that you feel you ever want to
+smoke again. I knew a man who reckoned that he had saved hundreds of
+pounds by smoking Dutch cigars for a month steadily. It was years before
+he again ventured on tobacco.
+
+Watching building operations in Holland brings home to you forcibly, what
+previously you have regarded as a meaningless formula—namely, that the
+country is built upon piles. A dozen feet below the level of the street
+one sees the labourers working in fishermen’s boots up to their knees in
+water, driving the great wooden blocks into the mud. Many of the older
+houses slope forward at such an angle that you almost fear to pass
+beneath them. I should be as nervous as a kitten, living in one of the
+upper storeys. But the Dutchman leans out of a window that is hanging
+above the street six feet beyond the perpendicular, and smokes
+contentedly.
+
+They have a merry custom in Holland of keeping the railway time twenty
+minutes ahead of the town time—or is it twenty minutes behind? I never
+can remember when I’m there, and I am not sure now. The Dutchman himself
+never knows.
+
+“You’ve plenty of time,” he says
+
+“But the train goes at ten,” you say; “the station is a mile away, and it
+is now half-past nine.”
+
+“Yes, but that means ten-twenty,” he answers, “you have nearly an hour.”
+
+Five minutes later he taps you on the shoulder.
+
+“My mistake, it’s twenty to ten. I was thinking it was the other way
+about.”
+
+Another argues with him that his first idea was right. They work it out
+by scientific methods. Meanwhile you have dived into a cab. The result
+is always the same: you are either forty minutes too soon, or you have
+missed the train by twenty minutes. A Dutch platform is always crowded
+with women explaining volubly to their husbands either that there was not
+any need to have hurried, or else that the thing would have been to have
+started half an hour before they did, the man in both cases being, of
+course, to blame. The men walk up and down and swear.
+
+The idea has been suggested that the railway time and the town time
+should be made to conform. The argument against the idea is that if it
+were carried out there would be nothing left to put the Dutchman out and
+worry him.
+
+
+
+
+SHOULD WE SAY WHAT WE THINK, OR THINK WHAT WE SAY?
+
+
+A MAD friend of mine will have it that the characteristic of the age is
+Make-Believe. He argues that all social intercourse is founded on
+make-believe. A servant enters to say that Mr. and Mrs. Bore are in the
+drawing-room.
+
+“Oh, damn!” says the man.
+
+“Hush!” says the woman. “Shut the door, Susan. How often am I to tell
+you never to leave the door open?”
+
+The man creeps upstairs on tiptoe and shuts himself in his study. The
+woman does things before a looking-glass, waits till she feels she is
+sufficiently mistress of herself not to show her feelings, and then
+enters the drawing-room with outstretched hands and the look of one
+welcoming an angel’s visit. She says how delighted she is to see the
+Bores—how good it was of them to come. Why did they not bring more Bores
+with them? Where is naughty Bore junior? Why does he never come to see
+her now? She will have to be really angry with him. And sweet little
+Flossie Bore? Too young to pay calls! Nonsense. An “At Home” day is
+not worth having where all the Bores are not.
+
+The Bores, who had hoped that she was out—who have only called because
+the etiquette book told them that they must call at least four times in
+the season, explain how they have been trying and trying to come.
+
+“This afternoon,” recounts Mrs. Bore, “we were determined to come.
+‘John, dear,’ I said this morning, ‘I shall go and see dear Mrs. Bounder
+this afternoon, no matter what happens.’”
+
+The idea conveyed is that the Prince of Wales, on calling at the Bores,
+was told that he could not come in. He might call again in the evening
+or come some other day.
+
+That afternoon the Bores were going to enjoy themselves in their own way;
+they were going to see Mrs. Bounder.
+
+“And how is Mr. Bounder?” demands Mrs. Bore.
+
+Mrs. Bounder remains mute for a moment, straining her ears. She can hear
+him creeping past the door on his way downstairs. She hears the front
+door softly opened and closed-to. She wakes, as from a dream. She has
+been thinking of the sorrow that will fall on Bounder when he returns
+home later and learns what he has missed.
+
+And thus it is, not only with the Bores and Bounders, but even with us
+who are not Bores or Bounders. Society in all ranks is founded on the
+make-believe that everybody is charming; that we are delighted to see
+everybody; that everybody is delighted to see us; that it is so good of
+everybody to come; that we are desolate at the thought that they really
+must go now.
+
+Which would we rather do—stop and finish our cigar or hasten into the
+drawing-room to hear Miss Screecher sing? Can you ask us? We tumble
+over each other in our hurry. Miss Screecher would really rather not
+sing; but if we insist—We do insist. Miss Screecher, with pretty
+reluctance, consents. We are careful not to look at one another. We sit
+with our eyes fixed on the ceiling. Miss Screecher finishes, and rises.
+
+“But it was so short,” we say, so soon as we can be heard above the
+applause. Is Miss Screecher quite sure that was the whole of it? Or has
+she been playing tricks upon us, the naughty lady, defrauding us of a
+verse? Miss Screecher assures us that the fault is the composer’s. But
+she knows another. At this hint, our faces lighten again with gladness.
+We clamour for more.
+
+Our host’s wine is always the most extraordinary we have ever tasted.
+No, not another glass; we dare not—doctor’s orders, very strict. Our
+host’s cigar! We did not know they made such cigars in this workaday
+world. No, we really could not smoke another. Well, if he will be so
+pressing, may we put it in our pocket? The truth is, we are not used to
+high smoking. Our hostess’s coffee! Would she confide to us her secret?
+The baby! We hardly trust ourselves to speak. The usual baby—we have
+seen it. As a rule, to be candid, we never could detect much beauty in
+babies—have always held the usual gush about them to be insincere. But
+this baby! We are almost on the point of asking them where they got it.
+It is just the kind we wanted for ourselves. Little Janet’s recitation:
+“A Visit to the Dentist!” Hitherto the amateur reciter has not appealed
+to us. But this is genius, surely. She ought to be trained for the
+stage. Her mother does not altogether approve of the stage. We plead
+for the stage—that it may not be deprived of such talent.
+
+Every bride is beautiful. Every bride looks charming in a simple costume
+of—for further particulars see local papers. Every marriage is a cause
+for universal rejoicing. With our wine-glass in our hand we picture the
+ideal life we know to be in store for them. How can it be otherwise?
+She, the daughter of her mother. (Cheers.) He—well, we all know him.
+(More cheers.) Also involuntary guffaw from ill-regulated young man at
+end of table, promptly suppressed.
+
+We carry our make-believe even into our religion. We sit in church, and
+in voices swelling with pride, mention to the Almighty, at stated
+intervals, that we are miserable worms—that there is no good in us. This
+sort of thing, we gather, is expected of us; it does us no harm, and is
+supposed to please.
+
+We make-believe that every woman is good, that every man is honest—until
+they insist on forcing us, against our will, to observe that they are
+not. Then we become very angry with them, and explain to them that they,
+being sinners, are not folk fit to mix with us perfect people. Our
+grief, when our rich aunt dies, is hardly to be borne. Drapers make
+fortunes, helping us to express feebly our desolation. Our only
+consolation is that she has gone to a better world.
+
+Everybody goes to a better world when they have got all they can out of
+this one.
+
+We stand around the open grave and tell each other so. The clergyman is
+so assured of it that, to save time, they have written out the formula
+for him and had it printed in a little book. As a child it used to
+surprise me—this fact that everybody went to heaven. Thinking of all the
+people that had died, I pictured the place overcrowded. Almost I felt
+sorry for the Devil, nobody ever coming his way, so to speak. I saw him
+in imagination, a lonely old gentleman, sitting at his gate day after
+day, hoping against hope, muttering to himself maybe that it hardly
+seemed worth while, from his point of view, keeping the show open. An
+old nurse whom I once took into my confidence was sure, if I continued
+talking in this sort of way, that he would get me anyhow. I must have
+been an evil-hearted youngster. The thought of how he would welcome me,
+the only human being that he had seen for years, had a certain
+fascination for me; for once in my existence I should be made a fuss
+about.
+
+At every public meeting the chief speaker is always “a jolly good
+fellow.” The man from Mars, reading our newspapers, would be convinced
+that every Member of Parliament was a jovial, kindly, high-hearted,
+generous-souled saint, with just sufficient humanity in him to prevent
+the angels from carrying him off bodily. Do not the entire audience,
+moved by one common impulse, declare him three times running, and in
+stentorian voice, to be this “jolly good fellow”? So say all of them.
+We have always listened with the most intense pleasure to the brilliant
+speech of our friend who has just sat down. When you thought we were
+yawning, we were drinking in his eloquence, open-mouthed.
+
+The higher one ascends in the social scale, the wider becomes this
+necessary base of make-believe. When anything sad happens to a very big
+person, the lesser people round about him hardly care to go on living.
+Seeing that the world is somewhat overstocked with persons of importance,
+and that something or another generally is happening to them, one wonders
+sometimes how it is the world continues to exist.
+
+Once upon a time there occurred an illness to a certain good and great
+man. I read in my daily paper that the whole nation was plunged in
+grief. People dining in public restaurants, on being told the news by
+the waiter, dropped their heads upon the table and sobbed. Strangers,
+meeting in the street, flung their arms about one another and cried like
+little children. I was abroad at the time, but on the point of returning
+home. I almost felt ashamed to go. I looked at myself in the glass, and
+was shocked at my own appearance: it was that of a man who had not been
+in trouble for weeks. I felt that to burst upon this grief-stricken
+nation with a countenance such as mine would be to add to their sorrow.
+It was borne in upon me that I must have a shallow, egotistical nature.
+I had had luck with a play in America, and for the life of me I could not
+look grief-stricken. There were moments when, if I was not keeping a
+watch over myself, I found myself whistling.
+
+Had it been possible I would have remained abroad till some stroke of
+ill-fortune had rendered me more in tune with my fellow-countrymen. But
+business was pressing. The first man I talked to on Dover pier was a
+Customs House official. You might have thought sorrow would have made
+him indifferent to a mere matter of forty-eight cigars. Instead of
+which, he appeared quite pleased when he found them. He demanded
+three-and-fourpence, and chuckled when he got it. On Dover platform a
+little girl laughed because a lady dropped a handbox on a dog; but then
+children are always callous—or, perhaps, she had not heard the news.
+
+What astonished me most, however, was to find in the railway carriage a
+respectable looking man reading a comic journal. True, he did not laugh
+much: he had got decency enough for that; but what was a grief-stricken
+citizen doing with a comic journal, anyhow? Before I had been in London
+an hour I had come to the conclusion that we English must be a people of
+wonderful self-control. The day before, according to the newspapers, the
+whole country was in serious danger of pining away and dying of a broken
+heart. In one day the nation had pulled itself together. “We have cried
+all day,” they had said to themselves, “we have cried all night. It does
+not seem to have done much good. Now let us once again take up the
+burden of life.” Some of them—I noticed it in the hotel dining-room that
+evening—were taking quite kindly to their food again.
+
+We make believe about quite serious things. In war, each country’s
+soldiers are always the most courageous in the world. The other
+country’s soldiers are always treacherous and tricky; that is why they
+sometimes win. Literature is the art of make-believe.
+
+“Now all of you sit round and throw your pennies in the cap,” says the
+author, “and I will pretend that there lives in Bayswater a young lady
+named Angelina, who is the most beautiful young lady that ever existed.
+And in Notting Hill, we will pretend, there resides a young man named
+Edwin, who is in love with Angelina.”
+
+And then, there being sufficient pennies in the cap, the author starts
+away, and pretends that Angelina thought this and said that, and that
+Edwin did all sorts of wonderful things. We know he is making it all up
+as he goes along. We know he is making up just what he thinks will
+please us. He, on the other hand, has to make-believe that he is doing
+it because he cannot help it, he being an artist. But we know well
+enough that, were we to stop throwing the pennies into the cap, he would
+find out precious soon that he could.
+
+The theatrical manager bangs his drum.
+
+“Walk up! walk up!” he cries, “we are going to pretend that Mrs. Johnson
+is a princess, and old man Johnson is going to pretend to be a pirate.
+Walk up, walk up, and be in time!”
+
+So Mrs. Johnson, pretending to be a princess, comes out of a wobbly thing
+that we agree to pretend is a castle; and old man Johnson, pretending to
+be a pirate, is pushed up and down on another wobbly thing that we agree
+to pretend is the ocean. Mrs. Johnson pretends to be in love with him,
+which we know she is not. And Johnson pretends to be a very terrible
+person; and Mrs. Johnson pretends, till eleven o’clock, to believe it.
+And we pay prices, varying from a shilling to half-a-sovereign, to sit
+for two hours and listen to them.
+
+But as I explained at the beginning, my friend is a mad sort of person.
+
+
+
+
+IS THE AMERICAN HUSBAND MADE ENTIRELY OF STAINED GLASS.
+
+
+I AM glad I am not an American husband. At first sight this may appear a
+remark uncomplimentary to the American wife. It is nothing of the sort.
+It is the other way about. We, in Europe, have plenty of opportunity of
+judging the American wife. In America you hear of the American wife, you
+are told stories about the American wife, you see her portrait in the
+illustrated journals. By searching under the heading “Foreign
+Intelligence,” you can find out what she is doing. But here in Europe we
+know her, meet her face to face, talk to her, flirt with her. She is
+charming, delightful. That is why I say I am glad I am not an American
+husband. If the American husband only knew how nice was the American
+wife, he would sell his business and come over here, where now and then
+he could see her.
+
+Years ago, when I first began to travel about Europe, I argued to myself
+that America must be a deadly place to live in. How sad it is, I thought
+to myself, to meet thus, wherever one goes, American widows by the
+thousand. In one narrow by-street of Dresden I calculated fourteen
+American mothers, possessing nine-and-twenty American children, and not a
+father among them—not a single husband among the whole fourteen. I
+pictured fourteen lonely graves, scattered over the United States. I saw
+as in a vision those fourteen head-stones of best material, hand-carved,
+recording the virtues of those fourteen dead and buried husbands.
+
+Odd, thought I to myself, decidedly odd. These American husbands, they
+must be a delicate type of humanity. The wonder is their mothers ever
+reared them. They marry fine girls, the majority of them; two or three
+sweet children are born to them, and after that there appears to be no
+further use for them, as far as this world is concerned. Can nothing be
+done to strengthen their constitutions? Would a tonic be of any help to
+them? Not the customary tonic, I don’t mean, the sort of tonic merely
+intended to make gouty old gentlemen feel they want to buy a hoop, but
+the sort of tonic for which it was claimed that three drops poured upon a
+ham sandwich and the thing would begin to squeak.
+
+It struck me as pathetic, the picture of these American widows leaving
+their native land, coming over in shiploads to spend the rest of their
+blighted lives in exile. The mere thought of America, I took it, had for
+ever become to them distasteful. The ground that once his feet had
+pressed! The old familiar places once lighted by his smile! Everything
+in America would remind them of him. Snatching their babes to their
+heaving bosoms they would leave the country where lay buried all the joy
+of their lives, seek in the retirement of Paris, Florence or Vienna,
+oblivion of the past.
+
+Also, it struck me as beautiful, the noble resignation with which they
+bore their grief, hiding their sorrow from the indifferent stranger.
+Some widows make a fuss, go about for weeks looking gloomy and depressed,
+making not the slightest effort to be merry. These fourteen widows—I
+knew them personally, all of them, I lived in the same street—what a
+brave show of cheerfulness they put on! What a lesson to the common or
+European widow, the humpy type of widow! One could spend whole days in
+their company—I had done it—commencing quite early in the morning with a
+sleighing excursion, finishing up quite late in the evening with a little
+supper party, followed by an impromptu dance; and never detect from their
+outward manner that they were not thoroughly enjoying themselves.
+
+From the mothers I turned my admiring eyes towards the children. This is
+the secret of American success, said I to myself; this high-spirited
+courage, this Spartan contempt for suffering. Look at them! the gallant
+little men and women. Who would think that they had lost a father? Why,
+I have seen a British child more upset at losing sixpence.
+
+Talking to a little girl one day, I enquired of her concerning the health
+of her father. The next moment I could have bitten my tongue out,
+remembering that there wasn’t such a thing as a father—not an American
+father—in the whole street. She did not burst into tears as they do in
+the story-books. She said:
+
+“He is quite well, thank you,” simply, pathetically, just like that.
+
+“I am sure of it,” I replied with fervour, “well and happy as he deserves
+to be, and one day you will find him again; you will go to him.”
+
+“Ah, yes,” she answered, a shining light, it seemed to me, upon her fair
+young face. “Momma says she is getting just a bit tired of this
+one-horse sort of place. She is quite looking forward to seeing him
+again.”
+
+It touched me very deeply: this weary woman, tired of her long
+bereavement, actually looking forward to the fearsome passage leading to
+where her loved one waited for her in a better land.
+
+For one bright breezy creature I grew to feel a real regard. All the
+months that I had known her, seen her almost daily, never once had I
+heard a single cry of pain escape her lips, never once had I heard her
+cursing fate. Of the many who called upon her in her charming flat, not
+one had ever, to my knowledge, offered her consolation or condolence. It
+seemed to me cruel, callous. The over-burdened heart, finding no outlet
+for its imprisoned grief, finding no sympathetic ear into which to pour
+its tale of woe, breaks, we are told; anyhow, it isn’t good for it. I
+decided—no one else seeming keen—that I would supply that sympathetic
+ear. The very next time I found myself alone with her I introduced the
+subject.
+
+“You have been living here in Dresden a long time, have you not?” I
+asked.
+
+“About five years,” she answered, “on and off.”
+
+“And all alone,” I commented, with a sigh intended to invite to
+confidence.
+
+“Well, hardly alone,” she corrected me, while a look of patient
+resignation added dignity to her piquant features. “You see, there are
+the dear children always round about me, during the holidays.”
+
+“Besides,” she added, “the people here are real kind to me; they hardly
+ever let me feel myself alone. We make up little parties, you know,
+picnics and excursions. And then, of course, there is the Opera and the
+Symphony Concerts, and the subscription dances. The dear old king has
+been doing a good deal this winter, too; and I must say the Embassy folks
+have been most thoughtful, so far as I am concerned. No, it would not be
+right for me to complain of loneliness, not now that I have got to know a
+few people, as it were.”
+
+“But don’t you miss your husband?” I suggested.
+
+A cloud passed over her usually sunny face. “Oh, please don’t talk of
+him,” she said, “it makes me feel real sad, thinking about him.”
+
+But having commenced, I was determined that my sympathy should not be
+left to waste.
+
+“What did he die of?” I asked.
+
+She gave me a look the pathos of which I shall never forget.
+
+“Say, young man,” she cried, “are you trying to break it to me gently?
+Because if so, I’d rather you told me straight out. What did he die of?”
+
+“Then isn’t he dead?” I asked, “I mean so far as you know.”
+
+“Never heard a word about his being dead till you started the idea,” she
+retorted. “So far as I know he’s alive and well.”
+
+I said that I was sorry. I went on to explain that I did not mean I was
+sorry to hear that in all probability he was alive and well. What I
+meant was I was sorry I had introduced a painful subject.
+
+“What’s a painful subject?”
+
+“Why, your husband,” I replied.
+
+“But why should you call him a painful subject?”
+
+I had an idea she was getting angry with me. She did not say so. I
+gathered it. But I had to explain myself somehow.
+
+“Well,” I answered, “I take it, you didn’t get on well together, and I am
+sure it must have been his fault.”
+
+“Now look here,” she said, “don’t you breathe a word against my husband
+or we shall quarrel. A nicer, dearer fellow never lived.”
+
+“Then what did you divorce him for?” I asked. It was impertinent, it was
+unjustifiable. My excuse is that the mystery surrounding the American
+husband had been worrying me for months. Here had I stumbled upon the
+opportunity of solving it. Instinctively I clung to my advantage.
+
+“There hasn’t been any divorce,” she said. “There isn’t going to be any
+divorce. You’ll make me cross in another minute.”
+
+But I was becoming reckless. “He is not dead. You are not divorced from
+him. Where is he?” I demanded with some heat.
+
+“Where is he?” she replied, astonished. “Where should he be? At home,
+of course.”
+
+I looked around the luxuriously-furnished room with its air of cosy
+comfort, of substantial restfulness.
+
+“What home?” I asked.
+
+“What home! Why, our home, in Detroit.”
+
+“What is he doing there?” I had become so much in earnest that my voice
+had assumed unconsciously an authoritative tone. Presumably, it
+hypnotised her, for she answered my questions as though she had been in
+the witness-box.
+
+“How do I know? How can I possibly tell you what he is doing? What do
+people usually do at home?”
+
+“Answer the questions, madam, don’t ask them. What are you doing here?
+Quite truthfully, if you please.” My eyes were fixed upon her.
+
+“Enjoying myself. He likes me to enjoy myself. Besides, I am educating
+the children.”
+
+“You mean they are here at boarding-school while you are gadding about.
+What is wrong with American education? When did you see your husband
+last?”
+
+“Last? Let me see. No, last Christmas I was in Berlin. It must have
+been the Christmas before, I think.”
+
+“If he is the dear kind fellow you say he is, how is it you haven’t seen
+him for two years?”
+
+“Because, as I tell you, he is at home, in Detroit. How can I see him
+when I am here in Dresden and he is in Detroit? You do ask foolish
+questions. He means to try and come over in the summer, if he can spare
+the time, and then, of course—
+
+“Answer my questions, please. I’ve spoken to you once about it. Do you
+think you are performing your duty as a wife, enjoying yourself in
+Dresden and Berlin while your husband is working hard in Detroit?”
+
+“He was quite willing for me to come. The American husband is a good
+fellow who likes his wife to enjoy herself.”
+
+“I am not asking for your views on the American husband. I am asking
+your views on the American wife—on yourself. The American husband
+appears to be a sort of stained-glass saint, and you American wives are
+imposing upon him. It is doing you no good, and it won’t go on for ever.
+There will come a day when the American husband will wake up to the fact
+he is making a fool of himself, and by over-indulgence, over-devotion,
+turning the American woman into a heartless, selfish creature. What sort
+of a home do you think it is in Detroit, with you and the children over
+here? Tell me, is the American husband made entirely of driven snow,
+with blood distilled from moonbeams, or is he composed of the ordinary
+ingredients? Because, if the latter, you take my advice and get back
+home. I take it that in America, proper, there are millions of real
+homes where the woman does her duty and plays the game. But also it is
+quite clear there are thousands of homes in America, mere echoing rooms,
+where the man walks by himself, his wife and children scattered over
+Europe. It isn’t going to work, it isn’t right that it should work.”
+
+“You take the advice of a sincere friend. Pack up—you and the
+children—and get home.”
+
+I left. It was growing late. I felt it was time to leave. Whether she
+took my counsel I cannot say. I only know that there still remain in
+Europe a goodly number of American wives to whom it is applicable.
+
+
+
+
+DOES THE YOUNG MAN KNOW EVERYTHING WORTH KNOWING?
+
+
+I AM told that American professors are “mourning the lack of ideals” at
+Columbia University—possibly also at other universities scattered through
+the United States. If it be any consolation to these mourning American
+professors, I can assure them that they do not mourn alone. I live not
+far from Oxford, and enjoy the advantage of occasionally listening to the
+jeremiads of English University professors. More than once a German
+professor has done me the honour to employ me as an object on which to
+sharpen his English. He also has mourned similar lack of ideals at
+Heidelberg, at Bonn. Youth is youth all the world over; it has its own
+ideals; they are not those of the University professor. The explanation
+is tolerably simple. Youth is young, and the University professor,
+generally speaking, is middle-aged.
+
+I can sympathise with the mourning professor. I, in my time, have
+suffered like despair. I remember the day so well; it was my twelfth
+birthday. I recall the unholy joy with which I reflected that for the
+future my unfortunate parents would be called upon to pay for me full
+railway fare; it marked a decided step towards manhood. I was now in my
+teens. That very afternoon there came to visit us a relative of ours.
+She brought with her three small children: a girl, aged six; a precious,
+golden-haired thing in a lace collar that called itself a boy, aged five;
+and a third still smaller creature, it might have been male, it might
+have been female; I could not have told you at the time, I cannot tell
+you now. This collection of atoms was handed over to me.
+
+“Now, show yourself a man,” said my dear mother, “remember you are in
+your teens. Take them out for a walk and amuse them; and mind nothing
+happens to them.”
+
+To the children themselves their own mother gave instructions that they
+were to do everything that I told them, and not to tear their clothes or
+make themselves untidy. These directions, even to myself, at the time,
+appeared contradictory. But I said nothing. And out into the wilds the
+four of us departed.
+
+I was an only child. My own infancy had passed from my memory. To me,
+at twelve, the ideas of six were as incomprehensible as are those of
+twenty to the University professor of forty. I wanted to be a pirate.
+Round the corner and across the road building operations were in
+progress. Planks and poles lay ready to one’s hand. Nature, in the
+neighbourhood, had placed conveniently a shallow pond. It was Saturday
+afternoon. The nearest public-house was a mile away. Immunity from
+interference by the British workman was thus assured. It occurred to me
+that by placing my three depressed looking relatives on one raft,
+attacking them myself from another, taking the eldest girl’s sixpence
+away from her, disabling their raft, and leaving them to drift without a
+rudder, innocent amusement would be provided for half an hour at least.
+
+They did not want to play at pirates. At first sight of the pond the
+thing that called itself a boy began to cry. The six-year-old lady said
+she did not like the smell of it. Not even after I had explained the
+game to them were they any the more enthusiastic for it.
+
+I proposed Red Indians. They could go to sleep in the unfinished
+building upon a sack of lime, I would creep up through the grass, set
+fire to the house, and dance round it, whooping and waving my tomahawk,
+watching with fiendish delight the frantic but futile efforts of the
+palefaces to escape their doom.
+
+It did not “catch on”—not even that. The precious thing in the lace
+collar began to cry again. The creature concerning whom I could not have
+told you whether it was male or female made no attempt at argument, but
+started to run; it seemed to have taken a dislike to this particular
+field. It stumbled over a scaffolding pole, and then it also began to
+cry. What could one do to amuse such people? I left it to them to
+propose something. They thought they would like to play at “Mothers”—not
+in this field, but in some other field.
+
+The eldest girl would be mother. The other two would represent her
+children. They had been taken suddenly ill. “Waterworks,” as I had
+christened him, was to hold his hands to his middle and groan. His face
+brightened up at the suggestion. The nondescript had the toothache. It
+took up its part without a moment’s hesitation, and set to work to
+scream. I could be the doctor and look at their tongues.
+
+That was their “ideal” game. As I have said, remembering that afternoon,
+I can sympathise with the University professor mourning the absence of
+University ideals in youth. Possibly at six my own ideal game may have
+been “Mothers.” Looking back from the pile of birthdays upon which I now
+stand, it occurs to me that very probably it was. But from the
+perspective of twelve, the reflection that there were beings in the world
+who could find recreation in such fooling saddened me.
+
+Eight years later, his father not being able to afford the time, I
+conducted Master “Waterworks,” now a healthy, uninteresting, gawky lad,
+to a school in Switzerland. It was my first Continental trip. I should
+have enjoyed it better had he not been with me. He thought Paris a
+“beastly hole.” He did not share my admiration for the Frenchwoman; he
+even thought her badly dressed.
+
+“Why she’s so tied up, she can’t walk straight,” was the only impression
+she left upon him.
+
+We changed the subject; it irritated me to hear him talk. The beautiful
+Juno-like creatures we came across further on in Germany, he said were
+too fat. He wanted to see them run. I found him utterly soulless.
+
+To expect a boy to love learning and culture is like expecting him to
+prefer old vintage claret to gooseberry wine. Culture for the majority
+is an acquired taste. Speaking personally, I am entirely in agreement
+with the University professor. I find knowledge, prompting to
+observation and leading to reflection, the most satisfactory luggage with
+which a traveller through life can provide himself. I would that I had
+more of it. To be able to enjoy a picture is of more advantage than to
+be able to buy it.
+
+All that the University professor can urge in favour of idealism I am
+prepared to endorse. But then I am—let us say, thirty-nine. At fourteen
+my candid opinion was that he was talking “rot.” I looked at the old
+gentleman himself—a narrow-chested, spectacled old gentleman, who lived
+up a by street. He did not seem to have much fun of any sort. It was
+not my ideal. He told me things had been written in a language called
+Greek that I should enjoy reading, but I had not even read all Captain
+Marryat. There were tales by Sir Walter Scott and “Jack Harkaway’s
+Schooldays!” I felt I could wait a while. There was a chap called
+Aristophanes who had written comedies, satirising the political
+institutions of a country that had disappeared two thousand years ago. I
+say, without shame, Drury Lane pantomime and Barnum’s Circus called to me
+more strongly.
+
+Wishing to give the old gentleman a chance, I dipped into translations.
+Some of these old fellows were not as bad as I had imagined them. A
+party named Homer had written some really interesting stuff. Here and
+there, maybe, he was a bit long-winded, but, taking him as a whole, there
+was “go” in him. There was another of them—Ovid was his name. He could
+tell a story, Ovid could. He had imagination. He was almost as good as
+“Robinson Crusoe.” I thought it would please my professor, telling him
+that I was reading these, his favourite authors.
+
+“Reading them!” he cried, “but you don’t know Greek or Latin.”
+
+“But I know English,” I answered; “they have all been translated into
+English. You never told me that!”
+
+It appeared it was not the same thing. There were subtle delicacies of
+diction bound to escape even the best translator. These subtle
+delicacies of diction I could enjoy only by devoting the next seven or
+eight years of my life to the study of Greek and Latin. It will grieve
+the University professor to hear it, but the enjoyment of those subtle
+delicacies of diction did not appear to me—I was only fourteen at the
+time, please remember—to be worth the time and trouble.
+
+The boy is materially inclined—the mourning American professor has
+discovered it. I did not want to be an idealist living up a back street.
+I wanted to live in the biggest house in the best street of the town. I
+wanted to ride a horse, wear a fur coat, and have as much to eat and
+drink as ever I liked. I wanted to marry the most beautiful woman in the
+world, to have my name in the newspaper, and to know that everybody was
+envying me.
+
+Mourn over it, my dear professor, as you will—that is the ideal of youth;
+and, so long as human nature remains what it is, will continue to be so.
+It is a materialistic ideal—a sordid ideal. Maybe it is necessary.
+Maybe the world would not move much if the young men started thinking too
+early. They want to be rich, so they fling themselves frenziedly into
+the struggle. They build the towns, and make the railway tracks, hew
+down the forests, dig the ore out of the ground. There comes a day when
+it is borne in upon them that trying to get rich is a poor sort of
+game—that there is only one thing more tiresome than being a millionaire,
+and that is trying to be a millionaire. But, meanwhile, the world has
+got its work done.
+
+The American professor fears that the artistic development of America
+leaves much to be desired. I fear the artistic development of most
+countries leaves much to be desired. Why the Athenians themselves
+sandwiched their drama between wrestling competitions and boxing bouts.
+The plays of Sophocles, or Euripides, were given as “side shows.” The
+chief items of the fair were the games and races. Besides, America is
+still a young man. It has been busy “getting on in the world.” It has
+not yet quite finished. Yet there are signs that young America is
+approaching the thirty-nines. He is finding a little time, a little
+money to spare for art. One can almost hear young America—not quite so
+young as he was—saying to Mrs. Europe as he enters and closes the shop
+door:
+
+“Well, ma’am, here I am, and maybe you’ll be glad to hear I’ve a little
+money to spend. Yes, ma’am, I’ve fixed things all right across the
+water; we shan’t starve. So now, ma’am, you and I can have a chat
+concerning this art I’ve been hearing so much about. Let’s have a look
+at it, ma’am, trot it out, and don’t you be afraid of putting a fair
+price upon it.”
+
+I am inclined to think that Mrs. Europe has not hesitated to put a good
+price upon the art she has sold to Uncle Sam. I am afraid Mrs. Europe
+has occasionally “unloaded” on Uncle Sam. I talked to a certain dealer
+one afternoon, now many years ago, at the Uwantit Club.
+
+“What is the next picture likely to be missing?” I asked him in the
+course of general conversation.
+
+“Thome little thing of Hoppner’th, if it mutht be,” he replied with
+confidence.
+
+“Hoppner,” I murmured, “I seem to have heard the name.”
+
+“Yeth; you’ll hear it a bit oftener during the next eighteen month or
+tho. You take care you don’t get tired of hearing it, thath all,” he
+laughed. “Yeth,” he continued, thoughtfully, “Reynoldth ith played out.
+Nothing much to be made of Gainthborough, either. Dealing in that lot
+now, why, it’th like keeping a potht offith. Hoppner’th the coming man.”
+
+“You’ve been buying Hoppners up cheap,” I suggested.
+
+“Between uth,” he answered, “yeth, I think we’ve got them all. Maybe a
+few more. I don’t think we’ve mithed any.”
+
+“You will sell them for more than you gave for them,” I hinted.
+
+“You’re thmart,” he answered, regarding me admiringly, “you thee through
+everything you do.”
+
+“How do you work it?” I asked him. There is a time in the day when he is
+confidential. “Here is this man, Hoppner. I take it that you have
+bought him up at an average of a hundred pounds a picture, and that at
+that price most owners were fairly glad to sell. Few folks outside the
+art schools have ever heard of him. I bet that at the present moment
+there isn’t one art critic who could spell his name without reference to
+a dictionary. In eighteen months you will be selling him for anything
+from one thousand to ten thousand pounds. How is it done?”
+
+“How ith everything done that’th done well?” he answered. “By earnetht
+effort.” He hitched his chair nearer to me, “I get a chap—one of your
+thort of chapth—he writ’th an article about Hoppner. I get another to
+anthwer him. Before I’ve done there’ll be a hundred articleth about
+Hoppner—hith life, hith early thruggie, anecdo’th about hith wife. Then
+a Hoppner will be thold at public auchtion for a thouthand guineath.”
+
+“But how can you be certain it will fetch a thousand guineas?” I
+interrupted.
+
+“I happen to know the man whoth going to buy it.” He winked, and I
+understood.
+
+“A fortnight later there will be a thale of half-a-dothen, and the prithe
+will be gone up by that time.”
+
+“And after that?” I said.
+
+“After that,” he replied, rising, “the American millionaire! He’ll jutht
+be waiting on the door-thtep for the thale-room to open.”
+
+“If by any chance I come across a Hoppner?” I said, laughing, as I turned
+to go.
+
+“Don’t you hold on to it too long, that’th all,” was his advice.
+
+
+
+
+HOW MANY CHARMS HATH MUSIC, WOULD YOU SAY?
+
+
+THE argument of the late Herr Wagner was that grand opera—the music
+drama, as he called it—included, and therefore did away with the
+necessity for—all other arts. Music in all its branches, of course, it
+provides: so much I will concede to the late Herr Wagner. There are
+times, I confess, when my musical yearnings might shock the late Herr
+Wagner—times when I feel unequal to following three distinct themes at
+one and the same instant.
+
+“Listen,” whispers the Wagnerian enthusiast to me, “the cornet has now
+the Brunnhilda motive.” It seems to me, in my then state of depravity,
+as if the cornet had even more than this the matter with him.
+
+“The second violins,” continues the Wagnerian enthusiast, “are carrying
+on the Wotan theme.” That they are carrying on goes without saying: the
+players’ faces are streaming with perspiration.
+
+“The brass,” explains my friend—his object is to cultivate my ear—“is
+accompanying the singers.” I should have said drowning them. There are
+occasions when I can rave about Wagner with the best of them. High class
+moods come to all of us. The difference between the really high-class
+man and us commonplace, workaday men is the difference between, say, the
+eagle and the barnyard chicken. I am the barnyard chicken. I have my
+wings. There are ecstatic moments when I feel I want to spurn the sordid
+earth and soar into the realms of art. I do fly a little, but my body is
+heavy, and I only get as far as the fence. After a while I find it
+lonesome on the fence, and I hop down again among my fellows.
+
+Listening to Wagner, during such temporary Philistinic mood, my sense of
+fair play is outraged. A lone, lorn woman stands upon the stage trying
+to make herself heard. She has to do this sort of thing for her living;
+maybe an invalid mother, younger brothers and sisters are dependent upon
+her. One hundred and forty men, all armed with powerful instruments,
+well-organised, and most of them looking well-fed, combine to make it
+impossible for a single note of that poor woman’s voice to be heard above
+their din. I see her standing there, opening and shutting her mouth,
+getting redder and redder in the face. She is singing, one feels sure of
+it; one could hear her if only those one hundred and forty men would ease
+up for a minute. She makes one mighty, supreme effort; above the banging
+of the drums, the blare of the trumpets, the shrieking of the strings,
+that last despairing note is distinctly heard.
+
+She has won, but the victory has cost her dear. She sinks down fainting
+on the stage and is carried off by supers. Chivalrous indignation has
+made it difficult for me to keep my seat watching the unequal contest.
+My instinct was to leap the barrier, hurl the bald-headed chief of her
+enemies from his high chair, and lay about me with the trombone or the
+clarionet—whichever might have come the easier to my snatch.
+
+“You cowardly lot of bullies,” I have wanted to cry, “are you not ashamed
+of yourselves? A hundred and forty of you against one, and that one a
+still beautiful and, comparatively speaking, young lady. Be quiet for a
+minute—can’t you? Give the poor girl a chance.”
+
+A lady of my acquaintance says that sitting out a Wagnerian opera seems
+to her like listening to a singer accompanied by four orchestras playing
+different tunes at the same time. As I have said, there are times when
+Wagner carries me along with him, when I exult in the crash and whirl of
+his contending harmonies. But, alas! there are those other moods—those
+after dinner moods—when my desire is for something distinctly resembling
+a tune. Still, there are other composers of grand opera besides Wagner.
+I grant to the late Herr Wagner, that, in so far as music is concerned,
+opera can supply us with all we can need.
+
+But it was also Wagner’s argument that grand opera could supply us with
+acting, and there I am compelled to disagree with him. Wagner thought
+that the arts of acting and singing could be combined. I have seen
+artists the great man has trained himself. As singers they left nothing
+to be desired, but the acting in grand opera has never yet impressed me.
+Wagner never succeeded in avoiding the operatic convention and nobody
+else ever will. When the operatic lover meets his sweetheart he puts her
+in a corner and, turning his back upon her, comes down to the footlights
+and tells the audience how he adores her. When he has finished, he, in
+his turn, retires into the corner, and she comes down and tells the
+audience that she is simply mad about him.
+
+Overcome with joy at finding she really cares for him, he comes down
+right and says that this is the happiest moment of his life; and she
+stands left, twelve feet away from him, and has the presentiment that all
+this sort of thing is much too good to last. They go off together,
+backwards, side by side. If there is any love-making, such as I
+understand by the term, it is done “off.” This is not my idea of acting.
+But I do not see how you are going to substitute for it anything more
+natural. When you are singing at the top of your voice, you don’t want a
+heavy woman hanging round your neck. When you are killing a man and
+warbling about it at the same time, you don’t want him fooling around you
+defending himself. You want him to have a little reasonable patience,
+and to wait in his proper place till you have finished, telling him, or
+rather telling the crowd, how much you hate and despise him.
+
+When the proper time comes, and if he is where you expect to find him
+while thinking of your upper C, you will hit him lightly on the shoulder
+with your sword, and then he can die to his own particular tune. If you
+have been severely wounded in battle, or in any other sort of row, and
+have got to sing a long ballad before you finally expire, you don’t want
+to have to think how a man would really behave who knew he had only got a
+few minutes to live and was feeling bad about it. The chances are that
+he would not want to sing at all. The woman who really loved him would
+not encourage him to sing. She would want him to keep quiet while she
+moved herself about a bit, in case there was anything that could be done
+for him.
+
+If a mob is climbing the stairs thirsting for your blood, you do not want
+to stand upright with your arms stretched out, a good eighteen inches
+from the door, while you go over at some length the varied incidents
+leading up to the annoyance. If your desire were to act naturally you
+would push against that door for all you were worth, and yell for
+somebody to bring you a chest of drawers and a bedstead, and things like
+that, to pile up against it. If you were a king, and were giving a
+party, you would not want your guests to fix you up at the other end of
+the room and leave you there, with nobody to talk to but your own wife,
+while they turned their backs upon you, and had a long and complicated
+dance all to themselves. You would want to be in it; you would want to
+let them know that you were king.
+
+In acting, all these little points have to be considered. In opera,
+everything is rightly sacrificed to musical necessity. I have seen the
+young, enthusiastic opera-singer who thought that he or she could act and
+sing at the same time. The experienced artist takes the centre of the
+stage and husbands his resources. Whether he is supposed to be indignant
+because somebody has killed his mother, or cheerful because he is going
+out to fight his country’s foes, who are only waiting until he has
+finished singing to attack the town, he leaves it to the composer to make
+clear.
+
+Also it was Herr Wagner’s idea that the back cloth would leave the
+opera-goer indifferent to the picture gallery. The castle on the rock,
+accessible only by balloon, in which every window lights up
+simultaneously and instantaneously, one minute after sunset, while the
+full moon is rushing up the sky at the pace of a champion comet—that
+wonderful sea that suddenly opens and swallows up the ship—those
+snow-clad mountains, over which the shadow of the hero passes like a
+threatening cloud—the grand old chateau, trembling in the wind—what need,
+will ask the opera-goer of the future, of your Turners and your Corots,
+when, for prices ranging from a shilling upwards, we can have a dozen
+pictures such as these rolled up and down before us every evening?
+
+But perhaps the most daring hope of all was the dream that came to Herr
+Wagner that his opera singers, his grouped choruses, would eventually
+satisfy the craving of the public for high class statuary. I am not
+quite sure the general public does care for statuary. I do not know
+whether the idea has ever occurred to the Anarchist, but, were I myself
+organising secret committee meetings for unholy purposes, I should invite
+my comrades to meet in that section of the local museum devoted to
+statuary. I can conceive of no place where we should be freer from
+prying eyes and listening ears. A select few, however, do appreciate
+statuary; and such, I am inclined to think, will not be weaned from their
+passion by the contemplation of the opera singer in his or her various
+quaint costumes.
+
+And even if the tenor always satisfied our ideal of Apollo, and the
+soprano were always as sylph-like as she is described in the libretto,
+even then I should doubt the average operatic chorus being regarded by
+the _connoisseur_ as a cheap and pleasant substitute for a bas relief
+from the Elgin marbles. The great thing required of that operatic chorus
+is experience. The young and giddy-pated the chorus master has no use
+for. The sober, honest, industrious lady or gentleman, with a knowledge
+of music is very properly his ideal.
+
+What I admire about the chorus chiefly is its unity. The whole village
+dresses exactly alike. In wicked, worldly villages there is rivalry,
+leading to heartburn and jealously. One lady comes out suddenly, on,
+say, a Bank Holiday, in a fetching blue that conquers every male heart.
+Next holiday her rival cuts her out with a green hat. In the operatic
+village it must be that the girls gather together beforehand to arrange
+this thing. There is probably a meeting called.
+
+“The dear Count’s wedding,” announces the chairwoman, “you will all be
+pleased to hear, has been fixed for the fourteenth, at eleven o’clock in
+the morning. The entire village will be assembled at ten-thirty to await
+the return of the bridal _cortège_ from the church, and offer its
+felicitations. Married ladies, will, of course, come accompanied by
+their husbands. Unmarried ladies must each bring a male partner as near
+their own height as possible. Fortunately, in this village the number of
+males is exactly equal to that of females, so that the picture need not
+be spoiled. The children will organise themselves into an independent
+body and will group themselves picturesquely. It has been thought
+advisable,” continues the chairwoman, “that the village should meet the
+dear Count and his bride at some spot not too far removed from the local
+alehouse. The costume to be worn by the ladies will consist of a short
+pink skirt terminating at the knees and ornamented with festoons of
+flowers; above will be worn a bolero in mauve silk without sleeves and
+cut _décolleté_. The shoes should be of yellow satin over flesh-coloured
+stockings. Ladies who are ‘out’ will wear pearl necklaces, and a simple
+device in emeralds to decorate the hair. Thank God, we can all of us
+afford it, and provided the weather holds up and nothing unexpected
+happens—he is not what I call a lucky man, our Count, and it is always as
+well to be prepared for possibilities—well, I think we may look forward
+to a really pleasant day.”
+
+It cannot be done, Herr Wagner, believe me. You cannot substitute the
+music drama for all the arts combined. The object to be aimed at by the
+wise composer should be to make us, while listening to his music,
+forgetful of all remaining artistic considerations.
+
+
+
+
+THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN! NEED IT BE SO HEAVY?
+
+
+IT is a delightful stroll on a sunny summer morning from the Hague to the
+Huis ten Bosch, the little “house in the wood,” built for Princess
+Amalia, widow of Stadtholter Frederick Henry, under whom Holland escaped
+finally from the bondage of her foes and entered into the promised land
+of Liberty. Leaving the quiet streets, the tree-bordered canals, with
+their creeping barges, you pass through a pleasant park, where the
+soft-eyed deer press round you, hurt and indignant if you have brought
+nothing in your pocket—not even a piece of sugar—to offer them. It is
+not that they are grasping—it is the want of attention that wounds them.
+
+“I thought he was a gentleman,” they seem to be saying to one another, if
+you glance back, “he looked like a gentleman.”
+
+Their mild eyes haunt you; on the next occasion you do not forget. The
+Park merges into the forest; you go by winding ways till you reach the
+trim Dutch garden, moat-encircled, in the centre of which stands the prim
+old-fashioned villa, which, to the simple Dutchman, appears a palace.
+The _concierge_, an old soldier, bows low to you and introduces you to
+his wife—a stately, white-haired dame, who talks most languages a little,
+so far as relates to all things within and appertaining to this tiny
+palace of the wood. To things without, beyond the wood, her powers of
+conversation do not extend: apparently such matters do not interest her.
+
+She conducts you to the Chinese Room; the sun streams through the
+windows, illuminating the wondrous golden dragons standing out in bold
+relief from the burnished lacquer work, decorating still further with
+light and shade the delicate silk embroideries thin taper hands have
+woven with infinite pains. The walls are hung with rice paper, depicting
+the conventional scenes of the conventional Chinese life.
+
+You find your thoughts wandering. These grotesque figures, these
+caricatures of humanity! A comical creature, surely, this Chinaman, the
+pantaloon of civilization. How useful he has been to us for our farces,
+our comic operas! This yellow baby, in his ample pinafore, who lived
+thousands of years ago, who has now passed into this strange second
+childhood.
+
+But is he dying—or does the life of a nation wake again, as after sleep?
+Is he this droll, harmless thing he here depicts himself? And if not?
+Suppose fresh sap be stirring through his three hundred millions? We
+thought he was so very dead; we thought the time had come to cut him up
+and divide him, the only danger being lest we should quarrel over his
+carcase among ourselves.
+
+Suppose it turns out as the fable of the woodcutter and the bear? The
+woodcutter found the bear lying in the forest. At first he was much
+frightened, but the bear lay remarkably still. So the woodman crept
+nearer, ventured to kick the bear—very gently, ready to run if need be.
+Surely the bear was dead! And parts of a bear are good to eat, and
+bearskin to poor woodfolk on cold winter nights is grateful. So the
+woodman drew his knife and commenced the necessary preliminaries. But
+the bear was not dead.
+
+If the Chinaman be not dead? If the cutting-up process has only served
+to waken him? In a little time from now we shall know.
+
+From the Chinese Room the white-haired dame leads us to the Japanese
+Room. Had gentle-looking Princess Amalia some vague foreshadowing of the
+future in her mind when she planned these two rooms leading into one
+another? The Japanese decorations are more grotesque, the designs less
+cheerfully comical than those of cousin Chinaman. These monstrous,
+mis-shapen wrestlers, these patient-looking gods, with their inscrutable
+eyes! Was it always there, or is it only by the light of present events
+that one reads into the fantastic fancies of the artist working long ago
+in the doorway of his paper house, a meaning that has hitherto escaped
+us?
+
+But the chief attraction of the Huis ten Bosch is the gorgeous Orange
+Saloon, lighted by a cupola, fifty feet above the floor, the walls one
+blaze of pictures, chiefly of the gorgeous Jordaen school—“The Defeat of
+the Vices,” “Time Vanquishing Slander”—mostly allegorical, in praise of
+all the virtues, in praise of enlightenment and progress. Aptly enough
+in a room so decorated, here was held the famous Peace Congress that
+closed the last century. One can hardly avoid smiling as one thinks of
+the solemn conclave of grandees assembled to proclaim the popularity of
+Peace.
+
+It was in the autumn of the same year that Europe decided upon the
+dividing-up of China, that soldiers were instructed by Christian monarchs
+to massacre men, women and children, the idea being to impress upon the
+Heathen Chinee the superior civilization of the white man. The Boer war
+followed almost immediately. Since when the white man has been pretty
+busy all over the world with his “expeditions” and his “missions.” The
+world is undoubtedly growing more refined. We do not care for ugly
+words. Even the burglar refers airily to the “little job” he has on
+hand. You would think he had found work in the country. I should not be
+surprised to learn that he says a prayer before starting, telegraphs home
+to his anxious wife the next morning that his task has been crowned with
+blessing.
+
+Until the far-off date of Universal Brotherhood war will continue.
+Matters considered unimportant by both parties will—with a mighty
+flourish of trumpets—be referred to arbitration. I was talking of a
+famous financier a while ago with a man who had been his secretary.
+Amongst other anecdotes, he told me of a certain agreement about which
+dispute had arisen. The famous financier took the paper into his own
+hands and made a few swift calculations.
+
+“Let it go,” he concluded, “it is only a thousand pounds at the outside.
+May as well be honest.”
+
+Concerning a dead fisherman or two, concerning boundaries through
+unproductive mountain ranges we shall arbitrate and feel virtuous. For
+gold mines and good pasture lands, mixed up with a little honour to give
+respectability to the business, we shall fight it out, as previously.
+War being thus inevitable, the humane man will rejoice that by one of
+those brilliant discoveries, so simple when they are explained, war in
+the future is going to be rendered equally satisfactory to victor and to
+vanquished.
+
+In by-elections, as a witty writer has pointed out, there are no
+defeats—only victories and moral victories. The idea seems to have
+caught on. War in the future is evidently going to be conducted on the
+same understanding. Once upon a time, from a far-off land, a certain
+general telegraphed home congratulating his Government that the enemy had
+shown no inclination whatever to prevent his running away. The whole
+country rejoiced.
+
+“Why, they never even tried to stop him,” citizens, meeting other
+citizens in the street, told each other. “Ah, they’ve had enough of him.
+I bet they are only too glad to get rid of him. Why, they say he ran for
+miles without seeing a trace of the foe.”
+
+The enemy’s general, on the other hand, also wrote home congratulating
+his Government. In this way the same battle can be mafficked over by
+both parties. Contentment is the great secret of happiness. Everything
+happens for the best, if only you look at it the right way. That is
+going to be the argument. The general of the future will telegraph to
+headquarters that he is pleased to be able to inform His Majesty that the
+enemy, having broken down all opposition, has succeeded in crossing the
+frontier and is now well on his way to His Majesty’s capital.
+
+“I am luring him on,” he will add, “as fast as I can. At our present
+rate of progress, I am in hopes of bringing him home by the tenth.”
+
+Lest foolish civilian sort of people should wonder whereabouts lies the
+cause for rejoicing, the military man will condescend to explain. The
+enemy is being enticed farther and farther from his base. The defeated
+general—who is not really defeated, who is only artful, and who appears
+to be running away, is not really running away at all. On the contrary,
+he is running home—bringing, as he explains, the enemy with him.
+
+If I remember rightly—it is long since I played it—there is a parlour
+game entitled “Puss in the Corner.” You beckon another player to you
+with your finger. “Puss, puss!” you cry. Thereupon he has to leave his
+chair—his “base,” as the military man would term it—and try to get to you
+without anything happening to him.
+
+War in the future is going to be Puss in the Corner on a bigger scale.
+You lure your enemy away from his base. If all goes well—if he does not
+see the trap that is being laid for him—why, then, almost before he knows
+it, he finds himself in your capital. That finishes the game. You find
+out what it is he really wants. Provided it is something within reason,
+and you happen to have it handy, you give it to him. He goes home
+crowing, and you, on your side, laugh when you think how cleverly you
+succeeded in luring him away from his base.
+
+There is a bright side to all things. The gentleman charged with the
+defence of a fortress will meet the other gentleman who has captured it
+and shake hands with him mid the ruins.
+
+“So here you are at last!” he will explain. “Why didn’t you come before?
+We have been waiting for you.”
+
+And he will send off dispatches felicitating his chief on having got that
+fortress off their hands, together with all the worry and expense it has
+been to them. When prisoners are taken you will console yourself with
+the reflection that the cost of feeding them for the future will have to
+be borne by the enemy. Captured cannon you will watch being trailed away
+with a sigh of relief.
+
+“Confounded heavy things!” you will say to yourself. “Thank goodness
+I’ve got rid of them. Let him have the fun of dragging them about these
+ghastly roads. See how he likes the job!”
+
+War is a ridiculous method of settling disputes. Anything that can tend
+to make its ridiculous aspect more apparent is to be welcomed. The new
+school of military dispatch-writers may succeed in turning even the
+laughter of the mob against it.
+
+The present trouble in the East would never have occurred but for the
+white man’s enthusiasm for bearing other people’s burdens. What we call
+the yellow danger is the fear that the yellow man may before long request
+us, so far as he is concerned, to put his particular burden down. It may
+occur to him that, seeing it is his property, he would just as soon carry
+it himself. A London policeman told me a story the other day that struck
+him as an example of Cockney humour under trying circumstances. But it
+may also serve as a fable. From a lonely street in the neighbourhood of
+Covent Garden, early one morning, the constable heard cries of “Stop
+thief!” shouted in a childish treble. He arrived on the scene just in
+time to collar a young hooligan, who, having snatched a basket of fruit
+from a small lad—a greengrocer’s errand boy, as it turned out—was, with
+it, making tracks. The greengrocer’s boy, between panting and tears,
+delivered his accusation. The hooligan regarded him with an expression
+of amazed indignation.
+
+“What d’yer mean, stealing it?” exclaimed Mr. Hooligan. “Why, I was
+carrying it for yer!”
+
+The white man has got into the way of “carrying” other people’s burdens,
+and now it looks as if the yellow man were going to object to our
+carrying his any further. Maybe he is going to get nasty, and insist on
+carrying it himself. We call this “the yellow danger.”
+
+A friend of mine—he is a man who in the street walks into lamp-posts, and
+apologises—sees rising from the East the dawn of a new day in the world’s
+history. The yellow danger is to him a golden hope. He sees a race long
+stagnant, stretching its giant limbs with the first vague movements of
+returning life. He is a poor sort of patriot; he calls himself, I
+suppose, a white man, yet he shamelessly confesses he would rather see
+Asia’s millions rise from the ruins of their ancient civilization to take
+their part in the future of humanity, than that half the population of
+the globe should remain bound in savagery for the pleasure and the profit
+of his own particular species.
+
+He even goes so far as to think that the white man may have something to
+learn. The world has belonged to him now for some thousands of years.
+Has he done all with it that could have been done? Are his ideals the
+last word?
+
+Not what the yellow man has absorbed from Europe, but what he is going to
+give Europe it is that interests my friend. He is watching the birth of
+a new force—an influence as yet unknown. He clings to the fond belief
+that new ideas, new formulæ, to replace the old worn shibboleths, may,
+during these thousands of years, have been developing in those keen
+brains that behind the impressive yellow mask have been working so long
+in silence and in mystery.
+
+
+
+
+WHY DIDN’T HE MARRY THE GIRL?
+
+
+WHAT is wrong with marriage, anyhow? I find myself pondering this
+question so often, when reading high-class literature. I put it to
+myself again the other evening, during a performance of Faust. Why could
+not Faust have married the girl? I would not have married her myself for
+any consideration whatsoever; but that is not the argument. Faust,
+apparently, could not see anything amiss with her. Both of them were mad
+about each other. Yet the idea of a quiet, unostentatious marriage with
+a week’s honeymoon, say, in Vienna, followed by a neat little cottage
+_orné_, not too far from Nürnberg, so that their friends could have come
+out to them, never seems to have occurred to either of them.
+
+There could have been a garden. Marguerite might have kept chickens and
+a cow. That sort of girl, brought up to hard work and by no means too
+well educated, is all the better for having something to do. Later, with
+the gradual arrival of the family, a good, all-round woman might have
+been hired in to assist. Faust, of course, would have had his study and
+got to work again; that would have kept him out of further mischief. The
+idea that a brainy man, his age, was going to be happy with nothing to do
+all day but fool round a petticoat was ridiculous from the beginning.
+Valentine—a good fellow, Valentine, with nice ideas—would have spent his
+Saturdays to Monday with them. Over a pipe and a glass of wine, he and
+Faust would have discussed the local politics.
+
+He would have danced the children on his knee, have told them tales about
+the war—taught the eldest boy to shoot. Faust, with a practical man like
+Valentine to help him, would probably have invented a new gun. Valentine
+would have got it taken up.
+
+Things might have come of it. Sybil, in course of time, would have
+married and settled down—perhaps have taken a little house near to them.
+He and Marguerite would have joked—when Mrs. Sybil was not around—about
+his early infatuation. The old mother would have toddled over from
+Nürnberg—not too often, just for the day.
+
+The picture grows upon one the more one thinks of it. Why did it never
+occur to them? There would have been a bit of a bother with the Old Man.
+I can imagine Mephistopheles being upset about it, thinking himself
+swindled. Of course, if that was the reason—if Faust said to himself:
+
+“I should like to marry the girl, but I won’t do it; it would not be fair
+to the Old Man; he has been to a lot of trouble working this thing up; in
+common gratitude I cannot turn round now and behave like a decent,
+sensible man; it would not be playing the game”—if this was the way Faust
+looked at the matter there is nothing more to be said. Indeed, it shows
+him in rather a fine light—noble, if quixotic.
+
+If, on the other hand, he looked at the question from the point of view
+of himself and the girl, I think the thing might have been managed. All
+one had to do in those days when one wanted to get rid of the Devil was
+to show him a sword hilt. Faust and Marguerite could have slipped into a
+church one morning, and have kept him out of the way with a sword hilt
+till the ceremony was through. They might have hired a small boy:
+
+“You see the gentleman in red? Well, he wants us and we don’t want him.
+That is the only difference between us. Now, you take this sword, and
+when you see him coming show him the hilt. Don’t hurt him; just show him
+the sword and shake your head. He will understand.”
+
+The old gentleman’s expression, when subsequently Faust presented him to
+Marguerite, would have been interesting:
+
+“Allow me, my wife. My dear, a—a friend of mine. You may remember
+meeting him that night at your aunt’s.”
+
+As I have said, there would have been ructions; but I do not myself see
+what could have been done. There was nothing in the bond to the effect
+that Faust should not marry, so far as we are told. The Old Man had a
+sense of humour. My own opinion is that, after getting over the first
+annoyance, he himself would have seen the joke. I can even picture him
+looking in now and again on Mr. and Mrs. Faust. The children would be
+hurried off to bed. There would be, for a while, an atmosphere of
+constraint.
+
+But the Old Man had a way with him. He would have told one or two
+stories at which Marguerite would have blushed, at which Faust would have
+grinned. I can see the old fellow occasionally joining the homely social
+board. The children, awed at first, would have sat silent, with staring
+eyes. But, as I have said, the Old Man had a way with him. Why should
+he not have reformed? The good woman’s unconsciously exerted
+influence—the sweet childish prattle! One hears of such things. Might
+he not have come to be known as “Nunkie”?
+
+Myself—I believe I have already mentioned it—I would not have married
+Marguerite. She is not my ideal of a good girl. I never liked the way
+she deceived her mother. And that aunt of hers! Well, a nice girl would
+not have been friends with such a woman. She did not behave at all too
+well to Sybil, either. It is clear to me that she led the boy on. And
+what was she doing with that box of jewels, anyhow? She was not a fool.
+She could not have gone every day to that fountain, chatted with those
+girl friends of hers, and learnt nothing. She must have known that
+people don’t go leaving twenty thousand pounds’ worth of jewels about on
+doorsteps as part of a round game. Her own instinct, if she had been a
+good girl, would have told her to leave the thing alone.
+
+I don’t believe in these innocent people who do not know what they are
+doing half their time. Ask any London magistrate what he thinks of the
+lady who explains that she picked up the diamond brooch:—
+
+“Not meaning, of course, your Worship, to take it. I would not do such a
+thing. It just happened this way, your Worship. I was standing as you
+might say here, and not seeing anyone about in the shop I opened the case
+and took it out, thinking as perhaps it might belong to someone; and then
+this gentleman here, as I had not noticed before, comes up quite suddenly
+and says; ‘You come along with me,’ he says. ‘What for,’ I says, ‘when I
+don’t even know you?’ I says. ‘For stealing,’ he says. ‘Well, that’s a
+hard word to use to a lady,’ I says; ‘I don’t know what you mean, I’m
+sure.’”
+
+And if she had put them all on, not thinking, what would a really nice
+girl have done when the gentleman came up and assured her they were hers?
+She would have been thirty seconds taking them off and flinging them back
+into the box.
+
+“Thank you,” she would have said, “I’ll trouble you to leave this garden
+as quickly as you entered it and take them with you. I’m not that sort
+of girl.”
+
+Marguerite clings to the jewels, and accepts the young man’s arm for a
+moonlight promenade. And when it does enter into her innocent head that
+he and she have walked that shady garden long enough, what does she do
+when she has said good-bye and shut the door? She opens the ground-floor
+window and begins to sing!
+
+Maybe I am not poetical, but I do like justice. When other girls do
+these sort of things they get called names. I cannot see why this
+particular girl should be held up as an ideal. She kills her mother.
+According to her own account this was an accident. It is not an original
+line of defence, and we are not allowed to hear the evidence for the
+prosecution. She also kills her baby. You are not to blame her for
+that, because at the time she was feeling poorly. I don’t see why this
+girl should have a special line of angels to take her up to heaven.
+There must have been decent, hard-working women in Nürnburg more entitled
+to the ticket.
+
+Why is it that all these years we have been content to accept Marguerite
+as a type of innocence and virtue? The explanation is, I suppose, that
+Goethe wrote at a time when it was the convention to regard all women as
+good. Anything in petticoats was virtuous. If she did wrong it was
+always somebody else’s fault. _Cherchez la femme_ was a later notion.
+In the days of Goethe it was always _Cherchez l’homme_. It was the man’s
+fault. It was the devil’s fault. It was anybody’s fault you liked, but
+not her’s.
+
+The convention has not yet died out. I was reading the other day a most
+interesting book by a brilliant American authoress. Seeing I live far
+away from the lady’s haunts, I venture to mention names. I am speaking
+of “Patience Sparhawk,” by Gertrude Atherton. I take this book because
+it is typical of a large body of fiction. Miss Sparhawk lives a troubled
+life: it puzzles her. She asks herself what is wrong. Her own idea is
+that it is civilisation.
+
+If it is not civilisation, then it is the American man or Nature—or
+Democracy. Miss Sparhawk marries the wrong man. Later on she gets
+engaged to another wrong man. In the end we are left to believe she is
+about to be married to the right man. I should be better satisfied if I
+could hear Miss Sparhawk talking six months after that last marriage.
+But if a mistake has again been made I am confident that, in Miss
+Sparhawk’s opinion, the fault will not be Miss Sparhawk’s. The argument
+is always the same: Miss Sparhawk, being a lady, can do no wrong.
+
+If Miss Sparhawk cared to listen to me for five minutes, I feel I could
+put her right on this point.
+
+“It is quite true, my dear girl,” I should say to her, “something is
+wrong—very wrong. But it is not the American man. Never you mind the
+American man: you leave him to worry out his own salvation. You are not
+the girl to put him right, even where he is wrong. And it is not
+civilisation. Civilisation has a deal to answer for, I admit: don’t you
+load it up with this additional trouble. The thing that is wrong in this
+case of yours—if you will forgive my saying so—is you. You make a fool
+of yourself; you marry a man who is a mere animal because he appeals to
+your animal instincts. Then, like the lady who cried out ‘Alack, I’ve
+married a black,’ you appeal to heaven against the injustice of being
+mated with a clown. You are not a nice girl, either in your ideas or in
+your behaviour. I don’t blame you for it; you did not make yourself.
+But when you set to work to attract all that is lowest in man, why be so
+astonished at your own success? There are plenty of shocking American
+men, I agree. One meets the class even outside America. But nice
+American girls will tell you that there are also nice American men.
+There is an old proverb about birds of a feather. Next time you find
+yourself in the company of a shocking American man, you just ask yourself
+how he got there, and how it is he seems to be feeling at home. You
+learn self-control. Get it out of your head that you are the centre of
+the universe, and grasp the idea that a petticoat is not a halo, and you
+will find civilisation not half as wrong as you thought it.”
+
+I know what Miss Sparhawk’s reply would be.
+
+“You say all this to me—to me, a lady? Great Heavens! What has become
+of chivalry?”
+
+A Frenchman was once put on trial for murdering his father and mother.
+He confessed his guilt, but begged for mercy on the plea that he was an
+orphan. Chivalry was founded on the assumption that woman was worthy to
+be worshipped. The modern woman’s notion is that when she does wrong she
+ought to be excused by chivalrous man because she is a lady.
+
+I like the naughty heroine; we all of us do. The early Victorian
+heroine—the angel in a white frock, was a bore. We knew exactly what she
+was going to do—the right thing. We did not even have to ask ourselves,
+“What will she think is the right thing to do under the circumstances?”
+It was always the conventional right thing. You could have put it to a
+Sunday school and have got the answer every time. The heroine with
+passions, instincts, emotions, is to be welcomed. But I want her to
+grasp the fact that after all she is only one of us. I should like her
+better if, instead of demanding:
+
+“What is wrong in civilisation? What is the world coming to?” and so
+forth, she would occasionally say to herself:
+
+“Guess I’ve made a fool of myself this time. I do feel that ’shamed of
+myself.”
+
+She would not lose by it. We should respect her all the more.
+
+
+
+
+WHAT MRS. WILKINS THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
+
+
+LAST year, travelling on the Underground Railway, I met a man; he was one
+of the saddest-looking men I had seen for years. I used to know him well
+in the old days when we were journalists together. I asked him, in a
+sympathetic tone, how things were going with him. I expected his
+response would be a flood of tears, and that in the end I should have to
+fork out a fiver. To my astonishment, his answer was that things were
+going exceedingly well with him. I did not want to say to him bluntly:
+
+“Then what has happened to you to make you look like a mute at a
+temperance funeral?” I said:
+
+“And how are all at home?”
+
+I thought that if the trouble lay there he would take the opportunity.
+It brightened him somewhat, the necessity of replying to the question.
+It appeared that his wife was in the best of health.
+
+“You remember her,” he continued with a smile; “wonderful spirits, always
+cheerful, nothing seems to put her out, not even—”
+
+He ended the sentence abruptly with a sigh.
+
+His mother-in-law, I learned from further talk with him, had died since I
+had last met him, and had left them a comfortable addition to their
+income. His eldest daughter was engaged to be married.
+
+“It is entirely a love match,” he explained, “and he is such a dear, good
+fellow, that I should not have made any objection even had he been poor.
+But, of course, as it is, I am naturally all the more content.”
+
+His eldest boy, having won the Mottle Scholarship, was going up to
+Cambridge in the Autumn. His own health, he told me, had greatly
+improved; and a novel he had written in his leisure time promised to be
+one of the successes of the season. Then it was that I spoke plainly.
+
+“If I am opening a wound too painful to be touched,” I said, “tell me.
+If, on the contrary, it is an ordinary sort of trouble upon which the
+sympathy of a fellow worker may fall as balm, let me hear it.”
+
+“So far as I am concerned,” he replied, “I should be glad to tell you.
+Speaking about it does me good, and may lead—so I am always in hopes—to
+an idea. But, for your own sake, if you take my advice, you will not
+press me.”
+
+“How can it affect me?” I asked, “it is nothing to do with me, is it?”
+
+“It need have nothing to do with you,” he answered, “if you are sensible
+enough to keep out of it. If I tell you: from this time onward it will
+be your trouble also. Anyhow, that is what has happened in four other
+separate cases. If you like to be the fifth and complete the half dozen
+of us, you are welcome. But remember I have warned you.”
+
+“What has it done to the other five?” I demanded.
+
+“It has changed them from cheerful, companionable persons into gloomy
+one-idead bores,” he told me. “They think of but one thing, they talk of
+but one thing, they dream of but one thing. Instead of getting over it,
+as time goes on, it takes possession of them more and more. There are
+men, of course, who would be unaffected by it—who could shake it off. I
+warn you in particular against it, because, in spite of all that is said,
+I am convinced you have a sense of humour; and that being so, it will lay
+hold of you. It will plague you night and day. You see what it has made
+of me! Three months ago a lady interviewer described me as of a sunny
+temperament. If you know your own business you will get out at the next
+station.”
+
+I wish now I had followed his advice. As it was, I allowed my curiosity
+to take possession of me, and begged him to explain. And he did so.
+
+“It was just about Christmas time,” he said. “We were discussing the
+Drury Lane Pantomime—some three or four of us—in the smoking room of the
+Devonshire Club, and young Gold said he thought it would prove a mistake,
+the introduction of a subject like the Fiscal question into the story of
+Humpty Dumpty. The two things, so far as he could see, had nothing to do
+with one another. He added that he entertained a real regard for Mr. Dan
+Leno, whom he had once met on a steamboat, but that there were other
+topics upon which he would prefer to seek that gentleman’s guidance.
+Nettleship, on the other hand, declared that he had no sympathy with the
+argument that artists should never intrude upon public affairs. The
+actor was a fellow citizen with the rest of us. He said that, whether
+one agreed with their conclusions or not, one must admit that the nation
+owed a debt of gratitude to Mrs. Brown Potter and to Miss Olga Nethersole
+for giving to it the benefit of their convictions. He had talked to both
+ladies in private on the subject and was convinced they knew as much
+about it as did most people.
+
+“Burnside, who was one of the party, contended that if sides were to be
+taken, a pantomime should surely advocate the Free-Food Cause, seeing it
+was a form of entertainment supposed to appeal primarily to the tastes of
+the Little Englander. Then I came into the discussion.
+
+“‘The Fiscal question,’ I said, ‘is on everybody’s tongue. Such being
+the case, it is fit and proper it should be referred to in our annual
+pantomime, which has come to be regarded as a review of the year’s
+doings. But it should not have been dealt with from the political
+standpoint. The proper attitude to have assumed towards it was that of
+innocent raillery, free from all trace of partisanship.’
+
+“Old Johnson had strolled up and was standing behind us.
+
+“‘The very thing I have been trying to get hold of for weeks,’ he said—‘a
+bright, amusing _resumé_ of the whole problem that should give offence to
+neither side. You know our paper,’ he continued; ‘we steer clear of
+politics, but, at the same time, try to be up-to-date; it is not always
+easy. The treatment of the subject, on the lines you suggest, is just
+what we require. I do wish you would write me something.’
+
+“He is a good old sort, Johnson; it seemed an easy thing. I said I
+would. Since that time I have been thinking how to do it. As a matter
+of fact, I have not thought of much else. Maybe you can suggest
+something.”
+
+I was feeling in a good working mood the next morning.
+
+“Pilson,” said I to myself, “shall have the benefit of this. He does not
+need anything boisterously funny. A few playfully witty remarks on the
+subject will be the ideal.”
+
+I lit a pipe and sat down to think. At half-past twelve, having to write
+some letters before going out to lunch, I dismissed the Fiscal question
+from my mind.
+
+But not for long. It worried me all the afternoon. I thought, maybe,
+something would come to me in the evening. I wasted all that evening,
+and I wasted all the following morning. Everything has its amusing side,
+I told myself. One turns out comic stories about funerals, about
+weddings. Hardly a misfortune that can happen to mankind but has
+produced its comic literature. An American friend of mine once took a
+contract from the Editor of an Insurance Journal to write four humorous
+stories; one was to deal with an earthquake, the second with a cyclone,
+the third with a flood, and the fourth with a thunderstorm. And more
+amusing stories I have never read. What is the matter with the Fiscal
+question?
+
+I myself have written lightly on Bime-metallism. Home Rule we used to be
+merry over in the eighties. I remember one delightful evening at the
+Codgers’ Hall. It would have been more delightful still, but for a
+raw-boned Irishman, who rose towards eleven o’clock and requested to be
+informed if any other speaker was wishful to make any more jokes on the
+subject of Ould Ireland; because, if so, the raw-boned gentleman was
+prepared to save time by waiting and dealing with them altogether. But
+if not, then—so the raw-boned gentleman announced—his intention was to go
+for the last speaker and the last speaker but two at once and without
+further warning.
+
+No other humourist rising, the raw-boned gentleman proceeded to make good
+his threat, with the result that the fun degenerated somewhat. Even on
+the Boer War we used to whisper jokes to one another in quiet places. In
+this Fiscal question there must be fun. Where is it?
+
+For days I thought of little else. My laundress—as we call them in the
+Temple—noticed my trouble.
+
+“Mrs. Wilkins,” I confessed, “I am trying to think of something
+innocently amusing to say on the Fiscal question.”
+
+“I’ve ’eard about it,” she said, “but I don’t ’ave much time to read the
+papers. They want to make us pay more for our food, don’t they?”
+
+“For some of it,” I explained. “But, then, we shall pay less for other
+things, so that really we shan’t be paying more at all.”
+
+“There don’t seem much in it, either way,” was Mrs. Wilkins’ opinion.
+
+“Just so,” I agreed, “that is the advantage of the system. It will cost
+nobody anything, and will result in everybody being better off.”
+
+“The pity is,” said Mrs. Wilkins “that pity nobody ever thought of it
+before.”
+
+“The whole trouble hitherto,” I explained, “has been the foreigner.”
+
+“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I never ’eard much good of ’em, though they do
+say the Almighty ’as a use for almost everything.”
+
+“These foreigners,” I continued, “these Germans and Americans, they dump
+things on us, you know.”
+
+“What’s that?” demanded Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“What’s dump? Well, it’s dumping, you know. You take things, and you
+dump them down.”
+
+“But what things? ’Ow do they do it?” asked Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“Why, all sorts of things: pig iron, bacon, door-mats—everything. They
+bring them over here—in ships, you understand—and then, if you please,
+just dump them down upon our shores.”
+
+“You don’t mean surely to tell me that they just throw them out and leave
+them there?” queried Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“Of course not,” I replied; “when I say they dump these things upon our
+shores, that is a figure of speech. What I mean is they sell them to
+us.”
+
+“But why do we buy them if we don’t want them?” asked Mrs. Wilkins;
+“we’re not bound to buy them, are we?”
+
+“It is their artfulness,” I explained, “these Germans and Americans, and
+the others; they are all just as bad as one another—they insist on
+selling us these things at less price than they cost to make.”
+
+“It seems a bit silly of them, don’t it?” thought Mrs. Wilkins. “I
+suppose being foreigners, poor things, they ain’t naturally got much
+sense.”
+
+“It does seem silly of them, if you look at it that way,” I admitted,
+“but what we have got to consider is, the injury it is doing us.”
+
+“Don’t see ’ow it can do us much ’arm,” argued Mrs. Wilkins; “seems a bit
+of luck so far as we are concerned. There’s a few more things they’d be
+welcome to dump round my way.”
+
+“I don’t seem to be putting this thing quite in the right light to you,
+Mrs. Wilkins,” I confessed. “It is a long argument, and you might not be
+able to follow it; but you must take it as a fact now generally admitted
+that the cheaper you buy things the sooner your money goes. By allowing
+the foreigner to sell us all these things at about half the cost price,
+he is getting richer every day, and we are getting poorer. Unless we, as
+a country, insist on paying at least twenty per cent. more for everything
+we want, it is calculated that in a very few years England won’t have a
+penny left.”
+
+“Sounds a bit topsy turvy,” suggested Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“It may sound so,” I answered, “but I fear there can be no doubt of it.
+The Board of Trade Returns would seem to prove it conclusively.”
+
+“Well, God be praised, we’ve found it out in time,” ejaculated Mrs.
+Wilkins piously.
+
+“It is a matter of congratulation,” I agreed; “the difficulty is that a
+good many other people say that far from being ruined, we are doing very
+well indeed, and are growing richer every year.”
+
+“But ’ow can they say that,” argued Mrs. Wilkins, “when, as you tell me,
+those Trade Returns prove just the opposite?”
+
+“Well, they say the same, Mrs. Wilkins, that the Board of Trade Returns
+prove just the opposite.”
+
+“Well, they can’t both be right,” said Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“You would be surprised, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “how many things can be
+proved from Board of Trade Returns!”
+
+But I have not yet thought of that article for Pilson.
+
+
+
+
+SHALL WE BE RUINED BY CHINESE CHEAP LABOUR?
+
+
+“WHAT is all this talk I ’ear about the Chinese?” said Mrs. Wilkins to me
+the other morning. We generally indulge in a little chat while Mrs.
+Wilkins is laying the breakfast-table. Letters and newspapers do not
+arrive in my part of the Temple much before nine. From half-past eight
+to nine I am rather glad of Mrs. Wilkins. “They ’ave been up to some of
+their tricks again, ’aven’t they?”
+
+“The foreigner, Mrs. Wilkins,” I replied, “whether he be Chinee or any
+other he, is always up to tricks. Was not England specially prepared by
+an all-wise Providence to frustrate these knavish tricks? Which of such
+particular tricks may you be referring to at the moment, Mrs. Wilkins?”
+
+“Well, ’e’s comin’ over ’ere—isn’t he, sir? to take the work out of our
+mouths, as it were.”
+
+“Well, not exactly over here, to England, Mrs. Wilkins,” I explained.
+“He has been introduced into Africa to work in the mines there.”
+
+“It’s a funny thing,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “but to ’ear the way some of
+them talk in our block, you might run away with the notion—that is, if
+you didn’t know ’em—that work was their only joy. I said to one of ’em,
+the other evening—a man as calls ’isself a brass finisher, though, Lord
+knows, the only brass ’e ever finishes is what ’is poor wife earns and
+isn’t quick enough to ’ide away from ’im—well, whatever ’appens, I says,
+it will be clever of ’em if they take away much work from you. It made
+them all laugh, that did,” added Mrs. Wilkins, with a touch of pardonable
+pride.
+
+“Ah,” continued the good lady, “it’s surprising ’ow contented they can be
+with a little, some of ’em. Give ’em a ’ard-working woman to look after
+them, and a day out once a week with a procession of the unemployed, they
+don’t ask for nothing more. There’s that beauty my poor sister Jane was
+fool enough to marry. Serves ’er right, as I used to tell ’er at first,
+till there didn’t seem any more need to rub it into ’er. She’d ’ad one
+good ’usband. It wouldn’t ’ave been fair for ’er to ’ave ’ad another,
+even if there’d been a chance of it, seeing the few of ’em there is to go
+round among so many. But it’s always the same with us widows: if we
+’appen to ’ave been lucky the first time, we put it down to our own
+judgment—think we can’t ever make a mistake; and if we draw a wrong ’un,
+as the saying is, we argue as if it was the duty of Providence to make it
+up to us the second time. Why, I’d a been making a fool of myself three
+years ago if ’e ’adn’t been good-natured enough to call one afternoon
+when I was out, and ’ook it off with two pounds eight in the best teapot
+that I ’ad been soft enough to talk to ’im about: and never let me set
+eyes on ’im again. God bless ’im! ’E’s one of the born-tireds, ’e is,
+as poor Jane might ’ave seen for ’erself, if she ’ad only looked at ’im,
+instead of listening to ’im.
+
+“But that’s courtship all the world over—old and young alike, so far as
+I’ve been able to see it,” was the opinion of Mrs. Wilkins. “The man’s
+all eyes and the woman all ears. They don’t seem to ’ave any other
+senses left ’em. I ran against ’im the other night, on my way ’ome, at
+the corner of Gray’s Inn Road. There was the usual crowd watching a pack
+of them Italians laying down the asphalt in ’Olborn, and ’e was among
+’em. ’E ’ad secured the only lamp-post, and was leaning agen it.
+
+“’Ullo,’ I says, ‘glad to see you ’aven’t lost your job. Nothin’ like
+stickin’ to it, when you’ve dropped into somethin’ that really suits
+you.’
+
+“‘What do you mean, Martha?’ ’e says. ’E’s not one of what I call your
+smart sort. It takes a bit of sarcasm to get through ’is ’ead.
+
+“‘Well,’ I says, ‘you’re still on the old track, I see, looking for work.
+Take care you don’t ’ave an accident one of these days and run up agen it
+before you’ve got time to get out of its way.’
+
+“‘It’s these miserable foreigners,’ ’e says. ‘Look at ’em,’ ’e says.
+
+“‘There’s enough of you doing that,’ I says. ‘I’ve got my room to put
+straight and three hours needlework to do before I can get to bed. But
+don’t let me ’inder you. You might forget what work was like, if you
+didn’t take an opportunity of watching it now and then.’
+
+“‘They come over ’ere,’ ’e says, ‘and take the work away from us chaps.’
+
+“‘Ah,’ I says, ‘poor things, perhaps they ain’t married.’
+
+“‘Lazy devils! ’e says. ‘Look at ’em, smoking cigarettes. I could do
+that sort of work. There’s nothing in it. It don’t take ’eathen
+foreigners to dab a bit of tar about a road.’
+
+“‘Yes,’ I says, ‘you always could do anybody else’s work but your own.’
+
+“‘I can’t find it, Martha,’ ’e says.
+
+“‘No,’ I says, ‘and you never will in the sort of places you go looking
+for it. They don’t ’ang it out on lamp-posts, and they don’t leave it
+about at the street corners. Go ’ome,’ I says, ‘and turn the mangle for
+your poor wife. That’s big enough for you to find, even in the dark.’
+
+“Looking for work!” snorted Mrs. Wilkins with contempt; “we women never
+’ave much difficulty in finding it, I’ve noticed. There are times when I
+feel I could do with losing it for a day.”
+
+“But what did he reply, Mrs. Wilkins,” I asked; “your brass-finishing
+friend, who was holding forth on the subject of Chinese cheap labour.”
+Mrs. Wilkins as a conversationalist is not easily kept to the point. I
+was curious to know what the working classes were thinking on the
+subject.
+
+“Oh, that,” replied Mrs. Wilkins, “’e did not say nothing. ’E ain’t the
+sort that’s got much to say in an argument. ’E belongs to the crowd that
+’angs about at the back, and does the shouting. But there was another of
+’em, a young fellow as I feels sorry for, with a wife and three small
+children, who ’asn’t ’ad much luck for the last six months; and that
+through no fault of ’is own, I should say, from the look of ’im. ‘I was
+a fool,’ says ’e, ‘when I chucked a good situation and went out to the
+war. They told me I was going to fight for equal rights for all white
+men. I thought they meant that all of us were going to ’ave a better
+chance, and it seemed worth making a bit of sacrifice for, that did. I
+should be glad if they would give me a job in their mines that would
+enable me to feed my wife and children. That’s all I ask them for!’”
+
+“It is a difficult problem, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said. “According to the
+mine owners—”
+
+“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins. “They don’t seem to be exactly what you’d call
+popular, them mine owners, do they? Daresay they’re not as bad as
+they’re painted.”
+
+“Some people, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “paint them very black. There are
+those who hold that the South African mine-owner is not a man at all, but
+a kind of pantomime demon. You take Goliath, the whale that swallowed
+Jonah, a selection from the least respectable citizens of Sodom and
+Gomorrah at their worst, Bluebeard, Bloody Queen Mary, Guy Fawkes, and
+the sea-serpent—or, rather, you take the most objectionable attributes of
+all these various personages, and mix them up together. The result is
+the South African mine-owner, a monster who would willingly promote a
+company for the putting on the market of a new meat extract, prepared
+exclusively from new-born infants, provided the scheme promised a fair
+and reasonable opportunity of fleecing the widow and orphan.”
+
+“I’ve ’eard they’re a bad lot,” said Mrs. Wilkins. “But we’re most of us
+that, if we listen to what other people say about us.”
+
+“Quite so, Mrs. Wilkins,” I agreed. “One never arrives at the truth by
+listening to one side only. On the other hand, for example, there are
+those who stoutly maintain that the South African mine-owner is a kind of
+spiritual creature, all heart and sentiment, who, against his own will,
+has been, so to speak, dumped down upon this earth as the result of
+over-production up above of the higher class of archangel. The stock of
+archangels of superior finish exceeds the heavenly demand; the surplus
+has been dropped down into South Africa and has taken to mine owning. It
+is not that these celestial visitors of German sounding nomenclature care
+themselves about the gold. Their only desire is, during this earthly
+pilgrimage of theirs, to benefit the human race. Nothing can be obtained
+in this world without money—”
+
+“That’s true,” said Mrs. Wilkins, with a sigh.
+
+“For gold, everything can be obtained. The aim of the mine-owning
+archangel is to provide the world with gold. Why should the world
+trouble to grow things and make things? ‘Let us,’ say these archangels,
+temporarily dwelling in South Africa, ‘dig up and distribute to the world
+plenty of gold, then the world can buy whatever it wants, and be happy.’
+
+“There may be a flaw in the argument, Mrs. Wilkins,” I allowed. “I am
+not presenting it to you as the last word upon the subject. I am merely
+quoting the view of the South African mine-owner, feeling himself a much
+misunderstood benefactor of mankind.”
+
+“I expect,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “they are just the ordinary sort of
+Christian, like the rest of us, anxious to do the best they can for
+themselves, and not too particular as to doing other people in the
+process.”
+
+“I am inclined to think, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “that you are not very
+far from the truth. A friend of mine, a year ago, was very bitter on
+this subject of Chinese cheap labour. A little later there died a
+distant relative of his who left him twenty thousand South African mining
+shares. He thinks now that to object to the Chinese is narrow-minded,
+illiberal, and against all religious teaching. He has bought an abridged
+edition of Confucius, and tells me that there is much that is ennobling
+in Chinese morality. Indeed, I gather from him that the introduction of
+the Chinese into South Africa will be the saving of that country. The
+noble Chinese will afford an object lesson to the poor white man,
+displaying to him the virtues of sobriety, thrift, and humility. I also
+gather that it will be of inestimable benefit to the noble Chinee
+himself. The Christian missionary will get hold of him in bulk, so to
+speak, and imbue him with the higher theology. It appears to be one of
+those rare cases where everybody is benefited at the expense of nobody.
+It is always a pity to let these rare opportunities slip by.”
+
+“Well,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I’ve nothin’ to say agen the Chinaman, as a
+Chinaman. As to ’is being a ’eathen, well, throwin’ stones at a church,
+as the sayin’ is, don’t make a Christian of you. There’s Christians I’ve
+met as couldn’t do themselves much ’arm by changing their religion; and
+as to cleanliness, well, I’ve never met but one, and ’e was a
+washerwoman, and I’d rather ’ave sat next to ’im in a third-class
+carriage on a Bank ’Oliday than next to some of ’em.
+
+“Seems to me,” continued Mrs. Wilkins, “we’ve got into the ’abit of
+talkin’ a bit too much about other people’s dirt. The London atmosphere
+ain’t nat’rally a dry-cleanin’ process in itself, but there’s a goodish
+few as seem to think it is. One comes across Freeborn Britons ’ere and
+there as I’d be sorry to scrub clean for a shillin’ and find my own
+soap.”
+
+“It is a universal failing, Mrs. Wilkins,” I explained. “If you talk to
+a travelled Frenchman, he contrasts to his own satisfaction the Paris
+_ouvrier_ in his blue blouse with the appearance of the London labourer.”
+
+“I daresay they’re all right according to their lights,” said Mrs.
+Wilkins, “but it does seem a bit wrong that if our own chaps are willin’
+and anxious to work, after all they’ve done, too, in the way of getting
+the mines for us, they shouldn’t be allowed the job.”
+
+“Again, Mrs. Wilkins, it is difficult to arrive at a just conclusion,” I
+said. “The mine-owner, according to his enemies, hates the British
+workman with the natural instinct that evil creatures feel towards the
+noble and virtuous. He will go to trouble and expense merely to spite
+the British workman, to keep him out of South Africa. According to his
+friends, the mine-owner sets his face against the idea of white labour
+for two reasons. First and foremost, it is not nice work; the mine-owner
+hates the thought of his beloved white brother toiling in the mines. It
+is not right that the noble white man should demean himself by such work.
+Secondly, white labour is too expensive. If for digging gold men had to
+be paid anything like the same prices they are paid for digging coal, the
+mines could not be worked. The world would lose the gold that the
+mine-owner is anxious to bestow upon it.
+
+“The mine-owner, following his own inclinations, would take a little
+farm, grow potatoes, and live a beautiful life—perhaps write a little
+poetry. A slave to sense of duty, he is chained to the philanthropic
+work of gold-mining. If we hamper him and worry him the danger is that
+he will get angry with us—possibly he will order his fiery chariot and
+return to where he came from.”
+
+“Well, ’e can’t take the gold with him, wherever ’e goes to?” argued Mrs.
+Wilkins.
+
+“You talk, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “as if the gold were of more value to
+the world than is the mine-owner.”
+
+“Well, isn’t it?” demanded Mrs. Wilkins.
+
+“It’s a new idea, Mrs. Wilkins,” I answered; “it wants thinking out.”
+
+
+
+
+HOW TO SOLVE THE SERVANT PROBLEM.
+
+
+“I AM glad to see, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “that the Women’s Domestic
+Guild of America has succeeded in solving the servant girl problem—none
+too soon, one might almost say.”
+
+“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, as she took the cover off the bacon and gave an
+extra polish to the mustard-pot with her apron, “they are clever people
+over there; leastways, so I’ve always ’eard.”
+
+“This, their latest, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “I am inclined to regard as
+their greatest triumph. My hope is that the Women’s Domestic Guild of
+America, when it has finished with the United States and Canada, will,
+perhaps, see its way to establishing a branch in England. There are
+ladies of my acquaintance who would welcome, I feel sure, any really
+satisfactory solution of the problem.”
+
+“Well, good luck to it, is all I say,” responded Mrs. Wilkins, “and if it
+makes all the gals contented with their places, and all the mistresses
+satisfied with what they’ve got and ’appy in their minds, why, God bless
+it, say I.”
+
+“The mistake hitherto,” I said, “from what I read, appears to have been
+that the right servant was not sent to the right place. What the Women’s
+Domestic Guild of America proposes to do is to find the right servant for
+the right place. You see the difference, don’t you, Mrs. Wilkins?”
+
+“That’s the secret,” agreed Mrs. Wilkins. “They don’t anticipate any
+difficulty in getting the right sort of gal, I take it?”
+
+“I gather not, Mrs. Wilkins,” I replied.
+
+Mrs. Wilkins is of a pessimistic turn of mind.
+
+“I am not so sure about it,” she said; “the Almighty don’t seem to ’ave
+made too many of that sort. Unless these American ladies that you speak
+of are going to start a factory of their own. I am afraid there is
+disappointment in store for them.”
+
+“Don’t throw cold water on the idea before it is fairly started, Mrs.
+Wilkins,” I pleaded.
+
+“Well, sir,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I ’ave been a gal myself in service; and
+in my time I‘ve ’ad a few mistresses of my own, and I’ve ’eard a good
+deal about others. There are ladies and ladies, as you may know, sir,
+and some of them, if they aren’t exactly angels, are about as near to it
+as can be looked for in this climate, and they are not the ones that do
+most of the complaining. But, as for the average mistress—well it ain’t
+a gal she wants, it’s a plaster image, without any natural innards—a sort
+of thing as ain’t ’uman, and ain’t to be found in ’uman nature. And then
+she’d grumble at it, if it didn’t ’appen to be able to be in two places
+at once.”
+
+“You fear that the standard for that ‘right girl’ is likely to be set a
+trifle too high Mrs. Wilkins,” I suggested.
+
+“That ‘right gal,’ according to the notions of some of ’em,” retorted
+Mrs. Wilkins, “’er place ain’t down ’ere among us mere mortals; ’er place
+is up in ’eaven with a ’arp and a golden crown. There’s my niece, Emma,
+I don’t say she is a saint, but a better ’earted, ’arder working gal, at
+twenty pounds a year, you don’t expect to find, unless maybe you’re a
+natural born fool that can’t ’elp yourself. She wanted a place. She ’ad
+been ’ome for nearly six months, nursing ’er old father, as ’ad been down
+all the winter with rheumatic fever; and ’ard-put to it she was for a few
+clothes. You ’ear ’em talk about gals as insists on an hour a day for
+practising the piano, and the right to invite their young man to spend
+the evening with them in the drawing-room. Perhaps it is meant to be
+funny; I ain’t come across that type of gal myself, outside the pictures
+in the comic papers; and I’ll never believe, till I see ’er myself, that
+anybody else ’as. They sent ’er from the registry office to a lady at
+Clapton.
+
+“‘I ’ope you are good at getting up early in the morning?’ says the lady,
+‘I like a gal as rises cheerfully to ’er work.’
+
+“‘Well, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘I can’t say as I’ve got a passion for it.
+But it’s one of those things that ’as to be done, and I guess I’ve learnt
+the trick.’
+
+“‘I’m a great believer in early rising,’ says my lady; ‘in the morning,
+one is always fresher for one’s work; my ’usband and the younger children
+breakfast at ’arf past seven; myself and my eldest daughter ’ave our
+breakfest in bed at eight.’
+
+“‘That’ll be all right, ma’am,’ says Emma.
+
+“‘And I ’ope,’ says the lady, ‘you are of an amiable disposition. Some
+gals when you ring the bell come up looking so disagreeable, one almost
+wishes one didn’t want them.’
+
+“‘Well, it ain’t a thing,’ explains Emma, ‘as makes you want to burst out
+laughing, ’earing the bell go off for the twentieth time, and ’aving
+suddenly to put down your work at, perhaps, a critical moment. Some
+ladies don’t seem able to reach down their ’at for themselves.’
+
+“‘I ’ope you are not impertinent,’ says the lady; ‘if there’s one thing
+that I object to in a servant it is impertinence.’
+
+“‘We none of us like being answered back,’ says Emma, ‘more particularly
+when we are in the wrong. But I know my place ma’am, and I shan’t give
+you no lip. It always leads to less trouble, I find, keeping your mouth
+shut, rather than opening it.’
+
+“‘Are you fond of children,’ asks my lady.
+
+“‘It depends upon the children,’ says Emma; ‘there are some I ’ave ’ad to
+do with as made the day seem pleasanter, and I’ve come across others as I
+could ’ave parted from at any moment without tears.’
+
+“‘I like a gal,’ says the lady, ‘who is naturally fond of children, it
+shows a good character.’
+
+“‘How many of them are there?’ says Emma.
+
+“‘Four of them,’ answers my lady, ‘but you won’t ’ave much to do except
+with the two youngest. The great thing with young children is to
+surround them with good examples. Are you a Christian?’ asks my lady.
+
+“‘That’s what I’m generally called,’ says Emma.
+
+“‘Every other Sunday evening out is my rule,’ says the lady, ‘but of
+course I shall expect you to go to church.’
+
+“‘Do you mean in my time, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘or in yours.’
+
+“‘I mean on your evening of course,’ says my lady. ‘’Ow else could you
+go?’
+
+“‘Well, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘I like to see my people now and then.’
+
+“‘There are better things,’ says my lady, ‘than seeing what you call your
+people, and I should not care to take a girl into my ’ouse as put ’er
+pleasure before ’er religion. You are not engaged, I ’ope?’
+
+“‘Walking out, ma’am, do you mean?’ says Emma. ‘No, ma’am, there is
+nobody I’ve got in my mind—not just at present.’
+
+“‘I never will take a gal,’ explains my lady, ‘who is engaged. I find it
+distracts ’er attention from ’er work. And I must insist if you come to
+me,’ continues my lady, ‘that you get yourself another ’at and jacket.
+If there is one thing I object to in a servant it is a disposition to
+cheap finery.’
+
+“’Er own daughter was sitting there beside ’er with ’alf a dozen silver
+bangles on ’er wrist, and a sort of thing ’anging around ’er neck, as,
+’ad it been real, would ’ave been worth perhaps a thousand pounds. But
+Emma wanted a job, so she kept ’er thoughts to ’erself.
+
+“‘I can put these things by and get myself something else,’ she says, ‘if
+you don’t mind, ma’am, advancing me something out of my first three
+months’ wages. I’m afraid my account at the bank is a bit overdrawn.’
+
+“The lady whispered something to ’er daughter. ‘I am afraid, on thinking
+it over,’ she says, ‘that you won’t suit, after all. You don’t look
+serious enough. I feel sure, from the way you do your ’air,’ says my
+lady, ‘there’s a frivolous side to your nature.’
+
+“So Emma came away, and was not, on the whole, too sorry.”
+
+“But do they get servants to come to them, this type of mistress, do you
+think, Mrs. Wilkins?” I asked.
+
+“They get them all right,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “and if it’s a decent gal,
+it makes a bad gal of ’er, that ever afterwards looks upon every mistress
+as ’er enemy, and acts accordingly. And if she ain’t a naturally good
+gal, it makes ’er worse, and then you ’ear what awful things gals are. I
+don’t say it’s an easy problem,” continued Mrs. Wilkins, “it’s just like
+marriages. The good mistress gets ’old of the bad servant, and the bad
+mistress, as often as not is lucky.”
+
+“But how is it,” I argued, “that in hotels, for instance, the service is
+excellent, and the girls, generally speaking, seem contented? The work
+is hard, and the wages not much better, if as good.”
+
+“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “you ’ave ’it the right nail on the ’ead, there,
+sir. They go into the ’otels and work like niggers, knowing that if a
+single thing goes wrong they will be bully-ragged and sworn at till they
+don’t know whether they are standing on their ’ead or their ’eels. But
+they ’ave their hours; the gal knows when ’er work is done, and when the
+clock strikes she is a ’uman being once again. She ’as got that moment
+to look forward to all day, and it keeps ’er going. In private service
+there’s no moment in the day to ’ope for. If the lady is reasonable she
+ain’t overworked; but no ’ow can she ever feel she is her own mistress,
+free to come and go, to wear ’er bit of finery, to ’ave ’er bit of fun.
+She works from six in the morning till eleven or twelve at night, and
+then she only goes to bed provided she ain’t wanted. She don’t belong to
+’erself at all; it’s that that irritates them.”
+
+“I see your point, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “and, of course, in a house
+where two or three servants were kept some such plan might easily be
+arranged. The girl who commenced work at six o’clock in the morning
+might consider herself free at six o’clock in the evening. What she did
+with herself, how she dressed herself in her own time, would be her
+affair. What church the clerk or the workman belongs to, what company he
+keeps, is no concern of the firm. In such matters, mistresses, I am
+inclined to think, saddle themselves with a responsibility for which
+there is no need. If the girl behaves herself while in the house, and
+does her work, there the contract ends. The mistress who thinks it her
+duty to combine the _rôles_ of employer and of maiden aunt is naturally
+resented. The next month the girl might change her hours from twelve to
+twelve, and her fellow-servant could enjoy the six a.m. to six p.m.
+shift. But how do you propose to deal, Mrs. Wilkins, with the smaller
+_menage_, that employs only one servant?”
+
+“Well, sir,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “it seems to me simple enough. Ladies
+talk pretty about the dignity of labour, and are never tired of pointing
+out why gals should prefer domestic service to all other kinds of work.
+Suppose they practise what they preach. In the ’ouse, where there’s only
+the master and the mistress, and, say a couple of small children, let the
+lady take her turn. After all, it’s only her duty, same as the office or
+the shop is the man’s. Where, on the other ’and, there are biggish boys
+and gals about the place, well it wouldn’t do them any ’arm to be taught
+to play a little less, and to look after themselves a little more. It’s
+just arranging things—that’s all that’s wanted.”
+
+“You remind me of a family I once knew, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said; “it
+consisted of the usual father and mother, and of five sad, healthy girls.
+They kept two servants—or, rather, they never kept any servants; they
+lived always looking for servants, breaking their hearts over servants,
+packing servants off at a moment’s notice, standing disconsolately
+looking after servants who had packed themselves off at a moment’s
+notice, wondering generally what the world was coming too. It occurred
+to me at the time, that without much trouble, they could have lived a
+peaceful life without servants. The eldest girl was learning
+painting—and seemed unable to learn anything else. It was poor sort of
+painting; she noticed it herself. But she seemed to think that, if she
+talked a lot about it, and thought of nothing else, that somehow it would
+all come right. The second girl played the violin. She played it from
+early morning till late evening, and friends fell away from them. There
+wasn’t a spark of talent in the family, but they all had a notion that a
+vague longing to be admired was just the same as genius.
+
+“Another daughter fancied she would like to be an actress, and screamed
+all day in the attic. The fourth wrote poetry on a typewriter, and
+wondered why nobody seemed to want it; while the fifth one suffered from
+a weird belief that smearing wood with a red-hot sort of poker was a
+thing worth doing for its own sake. All of them seemed willing enough to
+work, provided only that it was work of no use to any living soul. With
+a little sense, and the occasional assistance of a charwoman, they could
+have led a merrier life.”
+
+“If I was giving away secrets,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I’d say to the
+mistresses: ‘Show yourselves able to be independent.’ It’s because the
+gals know that the mistresses can’t do without them that they sometimes
+gives themselves airs.”
+
+
+
+
+WHY WE HATE THE FOREIGNER.
+
+
+The advantage that the foreigner possesses over the Englishman is that he
+is born good. He does not have to try to be good, as we do. He does not
+have to start the New Year with the resolution to be good, and succeed,
+bar accidents, in being so till the middle of January. He is just good
+all the year round. When a foreigner is told to mount or descend from a
+tram on the near side, it does not occur to him that it would be humanly
+possible to secure egress from or ingress to that tram from the off side.
+
+In Brussels once I witnessed a daring attempt by a lawless foreigner to
+enter a tram from the wrong side. The gate was open: he was standing
+close beside it. A line of traffic was in his way: to have got round to
+the right side of that tram would have meant missing it. He entered when
+the conductor was not looking, and took his seat. The astonishment of
+the conductor on finding him there was immense. How did he get there?
+The conductor had been watching the proper entrance, and the man had not
+passed him. Later, the true explanation suggested itself to the
+conductor, but for a while he hesitated to accuse a fellow human being of
+such crime.
+
+He appealed to the passenger himself. Was his presence to be accounted
+for by miracle or by sin? The passenger confessed. It was more in
+sorrow than in anger that the conductor requested him at once to leave.
+This tram was going to be kept respectable. The passenger proved
+refractory, a halt was called, and the gendarmerie appealed to. After
+the manner of policemen, they sprang, as it were, from the ground, and
+formed up behind an imposing officer, whom I took to be the sergeant. At
+first the sergeant could hardly believe the conductor’s statement. Even
+then, had the passenger asserted that he had entered by the proper
+entrance, his word would have been taken. Much easier to the foreign
+official mind would it have been to believe that the conductor had been
+stricken with temporary blindness, than that man born of woman would have
+deliberately done anything expressly forbidden by a printed notice.
+
+Myself, in his case, I should have lied and got the trouble over. But he
+was a proud man, or had not much sense—one of the two, and so held fast
+to the truth. It was pointed out to him that he must descend immediately
+and wait for the next tram. Other gendarmes were arriving from every
+quarter: resistance in the circumstances seemed hopeless. He said he
+would get down. He made to descend this time by the proper gate, but
+that was not justice. He had mounted the wrong side, he must alight on
+the wrong side. Accordingly, he was put out amongst the traffic, after
+which the conductor preached a sermon from the centre of the tram on the
+danger of ascents and descents conducted from the wrong quarter.
+
+There is a law throughout Germany—an excellent law it is: I would we had
+it in England—that nobody may scatter paper about the street. An English
+military friend told me that, one day in Dresden, unacquainted with this
+rule, he tore a long letter he had been reading into some fifty fragments
+and threw them behind him. A policeman stopped him and explained to him
+quite politely the law upon the subject. My military friend agreed that
+it was a very good law, thanked the man for his information, and said
+that for the future he would bear it in mind. That, as the policeman
+pointed out, would make things right enough for the future, but meanwhile
+it was necessary to deal with the past—with the fifty or so pieces of
+paper lying scattered about the road and pavement.
+
+My military friend, with a pleasant laugh, confessed he did not see what
+was to be done. The policeman, more imaginative, saw a way out. It was
+that my military friend should set to work and pick up those fifty scraps
+of paper. He is an English General on the Retired List, and of imposing
+appearance: his manner on occasion is haughty. He did not see himself on
+his hands and knees in the chief street of Dresden, in the middle of the
+afternoon, picking up paper.
+
+The German policeman himself admitted that the situation was awkward. If
+the English General could not accept it there happened to be an
+alternative. It was that the English General should accompany the
+policeman through the streets, followed by the usual crowd, to the
+nearest prison, some three miles off. It being now four o’clock in the
+afternoon, they would probably find the judge departed. But the most
+comfortable thing possible in prison cells should be allotted to him, and
+the policeman had little doubt that the General, having paid his fine of
+forty marks, would find himself a free man again in time for lunch the
+following day. The general suggested hiring a boy to pick up the paper.
+The policeman referred to the wording of the law, and found that this
+would not be permitted.
+
+“I thought the matter out,” my friend told me, “imagining all the
+possible alternatives, including that of knocking the fellow down and
+making a bolt, and came to the conclusion that his first suggestion
+would, on the whole, result in the least discomfort. But I had no idea
+that picking up small scraps of thin paper off greasy stones was the
+business that I found it! It took me nearly ten minutes, and afforded
+amusement, I calculate, to over a thousand people. But it is a good law,
+mind you: all I wish is that I had known it beforehand.”
+
+On one occasion I accompanied an American lady to a German Opera House.
+The taking-off of hats in the German Schausspielhaus is obligatory, and
+again I would it were so in England. But the American lady is accustomed
+to disregard rules made by mere man. She explained to the doorkeeper
+that she was going to wear her hat. He, on his side, explained to her
+that she was not: they were both a bit short with one another. I took
+the opportunity to turn aside and buy a programme: the fewer people there
+are mixed up in an argument, I always think, the better.
+
+My companion explained quite frankly to the doorkeeper that it did not
+matter what he said, she was not going to take any notice of him. He did
+not look a talkative man at any time, and, maybe, this announcement
+further discouraged him. In any case, he made no attempt to answer. All
+he did was to stand in the centre of the doorway with a far-away look in
+his eyes. The doorway was some four feet wide: he was about three feet
+six across, and weighed about twenty stone. As I explained, I was busy
+buying a programme, and when I returned my friend had her hat in her
+hand, and was digging pins into it: I think she was trying to make
+believe it was the heart of the doorkeeper. She did not want to listen
+to the opera, she wanted to talk all the time about that doorkeeper, but
+the people round us would not even let her do that.
+
+She has spent three winters in Germany since then. Now when she feels
+like passing through a door that is standing wide open just in front of
+her, and which leads to just the place she wants to get to, and an
+official shakes his head at her, and explains that she must not, but must
+go up two flights of stairs and along a corridor and down another flight
+of stairs, and so get to her place that way, she apologises for her error
+and trots off looking ashamed of herself.
+
+Continental Governments have trained their citizens to perfection.
+Obedience is the Continent’s first law. The story that is told of a
+Spanish king who was nearly drowned because the particular official whose
+duty it was to dive in after Spanish kings when they tumbled out of boats
+happened to be dead, and his successor had not yet been appointed, I can
+quite believe. On the Continental railways if you ride second class with
+a first-class ticket you render yourself liable to imprisonment. What
+the penalty is for riding first with a second-class ticket I cannot
+say—probably death, though a friend of mine came very near on one
+occasion to finding out.
+
+All would have gone well with him if he had not been so darned honest.
+He is one of those men who pride themselves on being honest. I believe
+he takes a positive pleasure in being honest. He had purchased a
+second-class ticket for a station up a mountain, but meeting, by chance
+on the platform, a lady acquaintance, had gone with her into a
+first-class apartment. On arriving at the journey’s end he explained to
+the collector what he had done, and, with his purse in his hand, demanded
+to know the difference. They took him into a room and locked the door.
+They wrote out his confession and read it over to him, and made him sign
+it, and then they sent for a policeman.
+
+The policeman cross-examined him for about a quarter of an hour. They
+did not believe the story about the lady. Where was the lady? He did
+not know. They searched the neighbourhood for her, but could not find
+her. He suggested—what turned out to be the truth—that, tired of
+loitering about the station, she had gone up the mountain. An Anarchist
+outrage had occurred in the neighbouring town some months before. The
+policeman suggested searching for bombs. Fortunately, a Cook’s agent,
+returning with a party of tourists, arrived upon the scene, and took it
+upon himself to explain in delicate language that my friend was a bit of
+an ass and could not tell first class from second. It was the red
+cushions that had deceived my friend: he thought it was first class, as a
+matter of fact it was second class.
+
+Everybody breathed again. The confession was torn up amid universal joy:
+and then the fool of a ticket collector wanted to know about the lady—who
+must have travelled in a second-class compartment with a first-class
+ticket. It looked as if a bad time were in store for her on her return
+to the station.
+
+But the admirable representative of Cook was again equal to the occasion.
+He explained that my friend was also a bit of a liar. When he said he
+had travelled with this lady he was merely boasting. He would like to
+have travelled with her, that was all he meant, only his German was
+shaky. Joy once more entered upon the scene. My friend’s character
+appeared to be re-established. He was not the abandoned wretch for whom
+they had taken him—only, apparently, a wandering idiot. Such an one the
+German official could respect. At the expense of such an one the German
+official even consented to drink beer.
+
+Not only the foreign man, woman and child, but the foreign dog is born
+good. In England, if you happen to be the possessor of a dog, much of
+your time is taken up dragging him out of fights, quarrelling with the
+possessor of the other dog as to which began it, explaining to irate
+elderly ladies that he did not kill the cat, that the cat must have died
+of heart disease while running across the road, assuring disbelieving
+game-keepers that he is not your dog, that you have not the faintest
+notion whose dog he is. With the foreign dog, life is a peaceful
+proceeding. When the foreign dog sees a row, tears spring to his eyes:
+he hastens on and tries to find a policeman. When the foreign dog sees a
+cat in a hurry, he stands aside to allow her to pass. They dress the
+foreign dog—some of them—in a little coat, with a pocket for his
+handkerchief, and put shoes on his feet. They have not given him a
+hat—not yet. When they do, he will contrive by some means or another to
+raise it politely when he meets a cat he thinks he knows.
+
+One morning, in a Continental city, I came across a disturbance—it might
+be more correct to say the disturbance came across me: it swept down upon
+me, enveloped me before I knew that I was in it. A fox-terrier it was,
+belonging to a very young lady—it was when the disturbance was to a
+certain extent over that we discovered he belonged to this young lady.
+She arrived towards the end of the disturbance, very much out of breath:
+she had been running for a mile, poor girl, and shouting most of the way.
+When she looked round and saw all the things that had happened, and had
+had other things that she had missed explained to her, she burst into
+tears. An English owner of that fox-terrier would have given one look
+round and then have jumped upon the nearest tram going anywhere. But, as
+I have said, the foreigner is born good. I left her giving her name and
+address to seven different people.
+
+But it was about the dog I wished to speak more particularly. He had
+commenced innocently enough, trying to catch a sparrow. Nothing delights
+a sparrow more than being chased by a dog. A dozen times he thought he
+had the sparrow. Then another dog had got in his way. I don’t know what
+they call this breed of dog, but abroad it is popular: it has no tail and
+looks like a pig—when things are going well with it. This particular
+specimen, when I saw him, looked more like part of a doormat. The
+fox-terrier had seized it by the scruff of the neck and had rolled it
+over into the gutter just in front of a motor cycle. Its owner, a large
+lady, had darted out to save it, and had collided with the motor cyclist.
+The large lady had been thrown some half a dozen yards against an Italian
+boy carrying a tray load of plaster images.
+
+I have seen a good deal of trouble in my life, but never one yet that did
+not have an Italian image-vendor somehow or other mixed up in it. Where
+these boys hide in times of peace is a mystery. The chance of being
+upset brings them out as sunshine brings out flies. The motor cycle had
+dashed into a little milk-cart and had spread it out neatly in the middle
+of the tram lines. The tram traffic looked like being stopped for a
+quarter of an hour; but the idea of every approaching tram driver
+appeared to be that if he rang his bell with sufficient vigor this
+seeming obstruction would fade away and disappear.
+
+In an English town all this would not have attracted much attention.
+Somebody would have explained that a dog was the original cause, and the
+whole series of events would have appeared ordinary and natural. Upon
+these foreigners the fear descended that the Almighty, for some reason,
+was angry with them. A policeman ran to catch the dog.
+
+The delighted dog rushed backwards, barking furiously, and tried to throw
+up paving stones with its hind legs. That frightened a nursemaid who was
+wheeling a perambulator, and then it was that I entered into the
+proceedings. Seated on the edge of the pavement, with a perambulator on
+one side of me and a howling baby on the other, I told that dog what I
+thought of him.
+
+Forgetful that I was in a foreign land—that he might not understand me—I
+told it him in English, I told it him at length, I told it very loud and
+clear. He stood a yard in front of me, listening to me with an
+expression of ecstatic joy I have never before or since seen equalled on
+any face, human or canine. He drank it in as though it had been music
+from Paradise.
+
+“Where have I heard that song before?” he seemed to be saying to himself,
+“the old familiar language they used to talk to me when I was young?”
+
+He approached nearer to me; there were almost tears in his eyes when I
+had finished.
+
+“Say it again!” he seemed to be asking of me. “Oh! say it all over
+again, the dear old English oaths and curses that in this God-forsaken
+land I never hoped to hear again.”
+
+I learnt from the young lady that he was an English-born fox-terrier.
+That explained everything. The foreign dog does not do this sort of
+thing. The foreigner is born good: that is why we hate him.
+
+
+
+
+***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IDLE IDEAS IN 1905***
+
+
+******* This file should be named 3140-0.txt or 3140-0.zip *******
+
+
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/1/4/3140
+
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.