diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:34 -0700 |
| commit | f5c000f62ef6dd9cbe2e3660dae4ef94f1f1080f (patch) | |
| tree | de0dabc99f518fbc21e757894d308d0b1c693693 /3140-0.txt | |
Diffstat (limited to '3140-0.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 3140-0.txt | 5841 |
1 files changed, 5841 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3140-0.txt b/3140-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ade8714 --- /dev/null +++ b/3140-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,5841 @@ +The Project Gutenberg eBook, Idle Ideas in 1905, by Jerome K. Jerome + + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + + + + +Title: Idle Ideas in 1905 + + +Author: Jerome K. Jerome + + + +Release Date: April 21, 2013 [eBook #3140] +[This file was first posted on December 30, 2000] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IDLE IDEAS IN 1905*** + + +Transcribed from the 1905 Hurst and Blackett edition by David Price, +email ccx074@pglaf.org + + + + + + IDLE IDEAS + in 1905 + + + * * * * * + + BY + + JEROME K. JEROME + + AUTHOR OF + + “Three Men in a Boat,” + “Idle Thoughts of an Idle Fellow,” + etc. + + [Picture: Decorative graphic] + + LONDON + HURST AND BLACKETT, LIMITED + 182, HIGH HOLBORN, W.C. + + _All rights reserved_ + + + + +CONTENTS. + + CHAP. PAGE + I. ARE WE AS INTERESTING AS WE THINK WE ARE? 1 + II. SHOULD WOMEN BE BEAUTIFUL? 16 + III. WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO BE MERRY? 29 + IV. DO WE LIE A-BED TOO LATE? 46 + V. SHOULD MARRIED MEN PLAY GOLF? 60 + VI. ARE EARLY MARRIAGES A MISTAKE? 74 + VII. DO WRITERS WRITE TOO MUCH? 89 + VIII. SHOULD SOLDIERS BE POLITE? 105 + IX. OUGHT STORIES TO BE TRUE? 122 + X. CREATURES THAT ONE DAY SHALL BE MEN 141 + XI. HOW TO BE HAPPY THOUGH LITTLE 158 + XII. SHOULD WE SAY WHAT WE THINK, OR THINK WHAT WE 173 + SAY? + XIII. IS THE AMERICAN HUSBAND MADE ENTIRELY OF STAINED 186 + GLASS + XIV. DOES THE YOUNG MAN KNOW EVERYTHING WORTH KNOWING? 199 + XV. HOW MANY CHARMS HATH MUSIC, WOULD YOU SAY? 213 + XVI. THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN! NEED IT BE SO HEAVY? 225 + XVII. WHY DIDN’T HE MARRY THE GIRL? 238 + XVIII. WHAT MRS. WILKINS THOUGHT ABOUT IT 251 + XIX. SHALL WE BE RUINED BY CHINESE CHEAP LABOUR? 264 + XX. HOW TO SOLVE THE SERVANT PROBLEM 278 + XXI. WHY WE HATE THE FOREIGNER 292 + + + + +ARE WE AS INTERESTING AS WE THINK WE ARE? + + +“CHARMED. Very hot weather we’ve been having of late—I mean cold. Let +me see, I did not quite catch your name just now. Thank you so much. +Yes, it is a bit close.” And a silence falls, neither of us being able +to think what next to say. + +What has happened is this: My host has met me in the doorway, and shaken +me heartily by the hand. + +“So glad you were able to come,” he has said. “Some friends of mine +here, very anxious to meet you.” He has bustled me across the room. +“Delightful people. You’ll like them—have read all your books.” + +He has brought me up to a stately lady, and has presented me. We have +exchanged the customary commonplaces, and she, I feel, is waiting for me +to say something clever, original and tactful. And I don’t know whether +she is Presbyterian or Mormon; a Protectionist or a Free Trader; whether +she is engaged to be married or has lately been divorced! + +A friend of mine adopts the sensible plan of always providing you with a +short history of the person to whom he is about to lead you. + +“I want to introduce you to a Mrs. Jones,” he whispers. “Clever woman. +Wrote a book two years ago. Forget the name of it. Something about +twins. Keep away from sausages. Father ran a pork shop in the Borough. +Husband on the Stock Exchange. Keep off coke. Unpleasantness about a +company. You’ll get on best by sticking to the book. Lot in it about +platonic friendship. Don’t seem to be looking too closely at her. Has a +slight squint she tries to hide.” + +By this time we have reached the lady, and he introduces me as a friend +of his who is simply dying to know her. + +“Wants to talk about your book,” he explains. “Disagrees with you +entirely on the subject of platonic friendship. Sure you’ll be able to +convince him.” + +It saves us both a deal of trouble. I start at once on platonic +friendship, and ask her questions about twins, avoiding sausages and +coke. She thinks me an unusually interesting man, and I am less bored +than otherwise I might be. + +I have sometimes thought it would be a serviceable device if, in Society, +we all of us wore a neat card—pinned, say, upon our back—setting forth +such information as was necessary; our name legibly written, and how to +be pronounced; our age (not necessarily in good faith, but for purposes +of conversation. Once I seriously hurt a German lady by demanding of her +information about the Franco-German war. She looked to me as if she +could not object to being taken for forty. It turned out she was +thirty-seven. Had I not been an Englishman I might have had to fight a +duel); our religious and political beliefs; together with a list of the +subjects we were most at home upon; and a few facts concerning our +career—sufficient to save the stranger from, what is vulgarly termed +“putting his foot in it.” Before making jokes about “Dumping,” or +discussing the question of Chinese Cheap Labour, one would glance behind +and note whether one’s companion was ticketed “Whole-hogger,” or +“Pro-Boer.” Guests desirous of agreeable partners—an “agreeable person,” +according to the late Lord Beaconsfield’s definition, being “a person who +agrees with you”—could make their own selection. + +“Excuse me. Would you mind turning round a minute? Ah, ‘Wagnerian +Crank!’ I am afraid we should not get on together. I prefer the Italian +school.” + +Or, “How delightful. I see you don’t believe in vaccination. May I take +you into supper?” + +Those, on the other hand, fond of argument would choose a suitable +opponent. A master of ceremonies might be provided who would stand in +the centre of the room and call for partners: “Lady with strong views in +favour of female franchise wishes to meet gentleman holding the opinions +of St. Paul. With view to argument.” + +An American lady, a year or two ago, wrote me a letter that did me real +good: she appreciated my work with so much understanding, criticised it +with such sympathetic interest. She added that, when in England the +summer before, she had been on the point of accepting an invitation to +meet me; but at the last moment she had changed her mind; she felt so +sure—she put it pleasantly, but this is what it came to—that in my own +proper person I should fall short of her expectations. For my own sake I +felt sorry she had cried off; it would have been worth something to have +met so sensible a woman. An author introduced to people who have read—or +who say that they have read—his books, feels always like a man taken for +the first time to be shown to his future wife’s relations. They are very +pleasant. They try to put him at his ease. But he knows instinctively +they are disappointed with him. I remember, when a very young man, +attending a party at which a famous American humorist was the chief +guest. I was standing close behind a lady who was talking to her +husband. + +“He doesn’t look a bit funny,” said the lady. + +“Great Scott!” answered her husband. “How did you expect him to look? +Did you think he would have a red nose and a patch over one eye?” + +“Oh, well, he might look funnier than that, anyhow,” retorted the lady, +highly dissatisfied. “It isn’t worth coming for.” + +We all know the story of the hostess who, leaning across the table during +the dessert, requested of the funny man that he would kindly say +something amusing soon, because the dear children were waiting to go to +bed. Children, I suppose, have no use for funny people who don’t choose +to be funny. I once invited a friend down to my house for a Saturday to +Monday. He is an entertaining man, and before he came I dilated on his +powers of humour—somewhat foolishly perhaps—in the presence of a certain +youthful person who resides with me, and who listens when she oughtn’t +to, and never when she ought. He happened not to be in a humorous mood +that evening. My young relation, after dinner, climbed upon my knee. +For quite five minutes she sat silent. Then she whispered: + +“Has he said anything funny?” + +“Hush. No, not yet; don’t be silly.” + +Five minutes later: “Was that funny?” + +“No, of course not.” + +“Why not?” + +“Because—can’t you hear? We are talking about Old Age Pensions.” + +“What’s that?” + +“Oh, it’s—oh, never mind now. It isn’t a subject on which one can be +funny.” + +“Then what’s he want to talk about it for?” + +She waited for another quarter of an hour. Then, evidently bored, and +much to my relief, suggested herself that she might as well go to bed. +She ran to me the next morning in the garden with an air of triumph. + +“He said something so funny last night,” she told me. + +“Oh, what was it?” I inquired. It seemed to me I must have missed it. + +“Well, I can’t exactly ’member it,” she explained, “not just at the +moment. But it was so funny. I dreamed it, you know.” + +For folks not Lions, but closely related to Lions, introductions must be +trying ordeals. You tell them that for years you have been yearning to +meet them. You assure them, in a voice trembling with emotion, that this +is indeed a privilege. You go on to add that when a boy— + +At this point they have to interrupt you to explain that they are not the +Mr. So-and-So, but only his cousin or his grandfather; and all you can +think of to say is: “Oh, I’m so sorry.” + +I had a nephew who was once the amateur long-distance bicycle champion. +I have him still, but he is stouter and has come down to a motor car. In +sporting circles I was always introduced as “Shorland’s Uncle.” +Close-cropped young men would gaze at me with rapture; and then inquire: +“And do you do anything yourself, Mr. Jerome?” + +But my case was not so bad as that of a friend of mine, a doctor. He +married a leading actress, and was known ever afterwards as “Miss B—’s +husband.” + +At public dinners, where one takes one’s seat for the evening next to +someone that one possibly has never met before, and is never likely to +meet again, conversation is difficult and dangerous. I remember talking +to a lady at a Vagabond Club dinner. She asked me during the +_entree_—with a light laugh, as I afterwards recalled—what I thought, +candidly, of the last book of a certain celebrated authoress. I told +her, and a coldness sprang up between us. She happened to be the certain +celebrated authoress; she had changed her place at the last moment so as +to avoid sitting next to another lady novelist, whom she hated. + +One has to shift oneself, sometimes, on these occasions. A newspaper man +came up to me last Ninth of November at the Mansion House. + +“Would you mind changing seats with me?” he asked. “It’s a bit awkward. +They’ve put me next to my first wife.” + +I had a troubled evening myself once long ago. I accompanied a young +widow lady to a musical At Home, given by a lady who had more +acquaintances than she knew. We met the butler at the top of the stairs. +My friend spoke first: + +“Say Mrs. Dash and—” + +The butler did not wait for more—he was a youngish man—but shouted out: + +“Mr. and Mrs. Dash.” + +“My dear! how very quiet you have kept!” cried our hostess delighted. +“Do let me congratulate you.” + +The crush was too great and our hostess too distracted at the moment for +any explanations. We were swept away, and both of us spent the remainder +of the evening feebly protesting our singleness. + +If it had happened on the stage it would have taken us the whole play to +get out of it. Stage people are not allowed to put things right when +mistakes are made with their identity. If the light comedian is +expecting a plumber, the first man that comes into the drawing-room has +got to be a plumber. He is not allowed to point out that he never was a +plumber; that he doesn’t look like a plumber; that no one not an idiot +would mistake him for a plumber. He has got to be shut up in the +bath-room and have water poured over him, just as if he were a plumber—a +stage plumber, that is. Not till right away at the end of the last act +is he permitted to remark that he happens to be the new curate. + +I sat out a play once at which most people laughed. It made me sad. A +dear old lady entered towards the end of the first act. We knew she was +the aunt. Nobody can possibly mistake the stage aunt—except the people +on the stage. They, of course, mistook her for a circus rider, and shut +her up in a cupboard. It is what cupboards seem to be reserved for on +the stage. Nothing is ever put in them excepting the hero’s relations. +When she wasn’t in the cupboard she was in a clothes basket, or tied up +in a curtain. All she need have done was to hold on to something while +remarking to the hero: + +“If you’ll stop shouting and jumping about for just ten seconds, and give +me a chance to observe that I am your maiden aunt from Devonshire, all +this tomfoolery can be avoided.” + +That would have ended it. As a matter of fact that did end it five +minutes past eleven. It hadn’t occurred to her to say it before. + +In real life I never knew but of one case where a man suffered in silence +unpleasantness he could have ended with a word; and that was the case of +the late Corney Grain. He had been engaged to give his entertainment at +a country house. The lady was a _nouvelle riche_ of snobbish instincts. +She left instructions that Corney Grain when he arrived was to dine with +the servants. The butler, who knew better, apologised; but Corney was a +man not easily disconcerted. He dined well, and after dinner rose and +addressed the assembled company. + +“Well, now, my good friends,” said Corney, “if we have all finished, and +if you are all agreeable, I shall be pleased to present to you my little +show.” + +The servants cheered. The piano was dispensed with. Corney contrived to +amuse his audience very well for half-an-hour without it. At ten o’clock +came down a message: Would Mr. Corney Grain come up into the +drawing-room. Corney went. The company in the drawing-room were +waiting, seated. + +“We are ready, Mr. Grain,” remarked the hostess. + +“Ready for what?” demanded Corney. + +“For your entertainment,” answered the hostess. + +“But I have given it already,” explained Corney; “and my engagement was +for one performance only.” + +“Given it! Where? When?” + +“An hour ago, downstairs.” + +“But this is nonsense,” exclaimed the hostess. + +“It seemed to me somewhat unusual,” Corney replied; “but it has always +been my privilege to dine with the company I am asked to entertain. I +took it you had arranged a little treat for the servants.” + +And Corney left to catch his train. + +Another entertainer told me the following story, although a joke against +himself. He and Corney Grain were sharing a cottage on the river. A man +called early one morning to discuss affairs, and was talking to Corney in +the parlour, which was on the ground floor. The window was open. The +other entertainer—the man who told me the story—was dressing in the room +above. Thinking he recognised the voice of the visitor below, he leant +out of his bedroom window to hear better. He leant too far, and dived +head foremost into a bed of flowers, his bare legs—and only his bare +legs—showing through the open window of the parlour. + +“Good gracious!” exclaimed the visitor, turning at the moment and seeing +a pair of wriggling legs above the window sill; “who’s that?” + +Corney fixed his eyeglass and strolled to the window. + +“Oh, it’s only What’s-his-name,” he explained. “Wonderful spirits. Can +be funny in the morning.” + + + + +SHOULD WOMEN BE BEAUTIFUL? + + +PRETTY women are going to have a hard time of it later on. Hitherto, +they have had things far too much their own way. In the future there are +going to be no pretty girls, for the simple reason there will be no plain +girls against which to contrast them. Of late I have done some +systematic reading of ladies’ papers. The plain girl submits to a course +of “treatment.” In eighteen months she bursts upon Society an +acknowledged beauty. And it is all done by kindness. One girl writes: + +“Only a little while ago I used to look at myself in the glass and cry. +Now I look at myself and laugh.” + +The letter is accompanied by two photographs of the young lady. I should +have cried myself had I seen her as she was at first. She was a stumpy, +flat-headed, squat-nosed, cross-eyed thing. She did not even look good. +One virtue she appears to have had, however. It was faith. She believed +what the label said, she did what the label told her. She is now a tall, +ravishing young person, her only trouble being, I should say, to know +what to do with her hair—it reaches to her knees and must be a nuisance +to her. She would do better to give some of it away. Taking this young +lady as a text, it means that the girl who declines to be a dream of +loveliness does so out of obstinacy. What the raw material may be does +not appear to matter. Provided no feature is absolutely missing, the +result is one and the same. + +Arrived at years of discretion, the maiden proceeds to choose the style +of beauty she prefers. Will she be a Juno, a Venus, or a Helen? Will +she have a Grecian nose, or one tip-tilted like the petal of a rose? Let +her try the tip-tilted style first. The professor has an idea it is +going to be fashionable. If afterwards she does not like it, there will +be time to try the Grecian. It is difficult to decide these points +without experiment. + +Would the lady like a high or a low forehead? Some ladies like to look +intelligent. It is purely a matter of taste. With the Grecian nose, the +low broad forehead perhaps goes better. It is more according to +precedent. On the other hand, the high brainy forehead would be more +original. It is for the lady herself to select. + +We come to the question of eyes. The lady fancies a delicate blue, not +too pronounced a colour—one of those useful shades that go with almost +everything. At the same time there should be depth and passion. The +professor understands exactly the sort of eye the lady means. But it +will be expensive. There is a cheap quality; the professor does not +recommend it. True that it passes muster by gaslight, but the sunlight +shows it up. It lacks tenderness, and at the price you can hardly expect +it to contain much hidden meaning. The professor advises the melting, +Oh-George-take-me-in-your-arms-and-still-my-foolish-fears brand. It +costs a little more, but it pays for itself in the end. + +Perhaps it will be best, now the eye has been fixed upon, to discuss the +question of the hair. The professor opens his book of patterns. Maybe +the lady is of a wilful disposition. She loves to run laughing through +the woods during exceptionally rainy weather; or to gallop across the +downs without a hat, her fair ringlets streaming in the wind, the old +family coachman panting and expostulating in the rear. If one may trust +the popular novel, extremely satisfactory husbands have often been +secured in this way. You naturally look at a girl who is walking through +a wood, laughing heartily apparently for no other reason than because it +is raining—who rides at stretch gallop without a hat. If you have +nothing else to do, you follow her. It is always on the cards that such +a girl may do something really amusing before she gets home. Thus things +begin. + +To a girl of this kind, naturally curly hair is essential. It must be +the sort of hair that looks better when it is soaking wet. The bottle of +stuff that makes this particular hair to grow may be considered dear, if +you think merely of the price. But that is not the way to look at it. +“What is it going to do for me?” That is what the girl has got to ask +herself. It does not do to spoil the ship for a ha’porth of tar, as the +saying is. If you are going to be a dashing, wilful beauty, you must +have the hair for it, or the whole scheme falls to the ground. + +Eyebrows and eyelashes, the professor assumes, the lady would like to +match the hair. Too much eccentricity the professor does not agree with. +Nature, after all, is the best guide; neatness combined with taste, that +is the ideal to be aimed at. The eyebrows should be almost straight, the +professor thinks; the eyelashes long and silky, with just the suspicion +of a curl. The professor would also suggest a little less cheekbone. +Cheekbones are being worn low this season. + +Will the lady have a dimpled chin, or does she fancy the square-cut jaw? +Maybe the square-cut jaw and the firm, sweet mouth are more suitable for +the married woman. They go well enough with the baby and the tea-urn, +and the strong, proud man in the background. For the unmarried girl the +dimpled chin and the rosebud mouth are, perhaps, on the whole safer. +Some gentlemen are so nervous of that firm, square jaw. For the present, +at all events, let us keep to the rosebud and the dimple. + +Complexion! Well, there is only one complexion worth considering—a +creamy white, relieved by delicate peach pink. It goes with everything, +and is always effective. Rich olives, striking pallors—yes, you hear of +these things doing well. The professor’s experience, however, is that +for all-round work you will never improve upon the plain white and pink. +It is less liable to get out of order, and is the easiest at all times to +renew. + +For the figure, the professor recommends something lithe and supple. +Five foot four is a good height, but that is a point that should be +discussed first with the dressmaker. For trains, five foot six is, +perhaps, preferable. But for the sporting girl, who has to wear short +frocks, that height would, of course, be impossible. + +The bust and the waist are also points on which the dressmaker should be +consulted. Nothing should be done in a hurry. What is the fashion going +to be for the next two or three seasons? There are styles demanding that +beginning at the neck you should curve out, like a pouter pigeon. There +is apparently no difficulty whatever in obtaining this result. But if +crinolines, for instance, are likely to come in again! The lady has only +to imagine it for herself: the effect might be grotesque, suggestive of a +walking hour-glass. So, too, with the waist. For some fashions it is +better to have it just a foot from the neck. At other times it is more +useful lower down. The lady will kindly think over these details and let +the professor know. While one is about it, one may as well make a sound +job. + +It is all so simple, and, when you come to think of it, really not +expensive. Age, apparently, makes no difference. A woman is as old as +she looks. In future, I take it, there will be no ladies over +five-and-twenty. Wrinkles! Why any lady should still persist in wearing +them is a mystery to me. With a moderate amount of care any middle-class +woman could save enough out of the housekeeping money in a month to get +rid of every one of them. Grey hair! Well, of course, if you cling to +grey hair, there is no more to be said. But to ladies who would just as +soon have rich wavy-brown or a delicate shade of gold, I would point out +that there are one hundred and forty-seven inexpensive lotions on the +market, any one of which, rubbed gently into the head with a tooth-brush +(not too hard) just before going to bed will, to use a colloquialism, do +the trick. + +Are you too stout, or are you too thin? All you have to do is to say +which, and enclose stamps. But do not make a mistake and send for the +wrong recipe. If you are already too thin, you might in consequence +suddenly disappear before you found out your mistake. One very stout +lady I knew worked at herself for eighteen months and got stouter every +day. This discouraged her so much that she gave up trying. No doubt she +had made a muddle and had sent for the wrong bottle, but she would not +listen to further advice. She said she was tired of the whole thing. + +In future years there will be no need for a young man to look about him +for a wife; he will take the nearest girl, tell her his ideal, and, if +she really care for him, she will go to the shop and have herself fixed +up to his pattern. In certain Eastern countries, I believe, something of +this kind is done. A gentleman desirous of adding to his family sends +round the neighbourhood the weight and size of his favourite wife, +hinting that if another can be found of the same proportions, there is +room for her. Fathers walk round among their daughters, choose the most +likely specimen, and have her fattened up. That is their brutal Eastern +way. Out West we shall be more delicate. Match-making mothers will +probably revive the old confession book. Eligible bachelors will be +invited to fill in a page: “Your favourite height in women,” “Your +favourite measurement round the waist,” “Do you like brunettes or +blondes?” + +The choice will be left to the girls. + +“I do think Henry William just too sweet for words,” the maiden of the +future will murmur to herself. Gently, coyly, she will draw from him his +ideal of what a woman should be. In from six months to a year she will +burst upon him, the perfect She; height, size, weight, right to a T. He +will clasp her in his arms. + +“At last,” he will cry, “I have found her, the woman of my dreams.” + +And if he does not change his mind, and the bottles do not begin to lose +their effect, there will be every chance that they will be happy ever +afterwards. + +Might not Science go even further? Why rest satisfied with making a +world of merely beautiful women? Cannot Science, while she is about it, +make them all good at the same time. I do not apologise for the +suggestion. I used to think all women beautiful and good. It is their +own papers that have disillusioned me. I used to look at this lady or at +that—shyly, when nobody seemed to be noticing me—and think how fair she +was, how stately. Now I only wonder who is her chemist. + +They used to tell me, when I was a little boy, that girls were made of +sugar and spice. I know better now. I have read the recipes in the +Answers to Correspondents. + +When I was quite a young man I used to sit in dark corners and listen, +with swelling heart, while people at the piano told me where little girl +babies got their wonderful eyes from, of the things they did to them in +heaven that gave them dimples. Ah me! I wish now I had never come +across those ladies’ papers. I know the stuff that causes those +bewitching eyes. I know the shop where they make those dimples; I have +passed it and looked in. I thought they were produced by angels’ kisses, +but there was not an angel about the place, that I could see. Perhaps I +have also been deceived as regards their goodness. Maybe all women are +not so perfect as in the popular short story they appear to be. That is +why I suggest that Science should proceed still further, and make them +all as beautiful in mind as she is now able to make them in body. May we +not live to see in the advertisement columns of the ladies’ paper of the +future the portrait of a young girl sulking in a corner—“Before taking +the lotion!” The same girl dancing among her little brothers and +sisters, shedding sunlight through the home—“After the three first +bottles!” May we not have the Caudle Mixture: One tablespoonful at +bed-time guaranteed to make the lady murmur, “Good-night, dear; hope +you’ll sleep well,” and at once to fall asleep, her lips parted in a +smile? Maybe some specialist of the future will advertise Mind Massage: +“Warranted to remove from the most obstinate subject all traces of +hatred, envy, and malice.” + +And, when Science has done everything possible for women, there might be +no harm in her turning her attention to us men. Her idea at present +seems to be that we men are too beautiful, physically and morally, to +need improvement. Personally, there are one or two points about which I +should like to consult her. + + + + +WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO BE MERRY? + + +THERE is so much I could do to improve things generally in and about +Europe, if only I had a free hand. I should not propose any great +fundamental changes. These poor people have got used to their own ways; +it would be unwise to reform them all at once. But there are many little +odds and ends that I could do for them, so many of their mistakes I could +correct for them. They do not know this. If they only knew there was a +man living in their midst willing to take them in hand and arrange things +for them, how glad they would be. But the story is always the same. One +reads it in the advertisements of the matrimonial column: + +“A lady, young, said to be good-looking”—she herself is not sure on the +point; she feels that possibly she may be prejudiced; she puts before you +merely the current gossip of the neighbourhood; people say she is +beautiful; they may be right, they may be wrong: it is not for her to +decide—“well-educated, of affectionate disposition, possessed of means, +desires to meet gentleman with a view to matrimony.” + +Immediately underneath one reads of a gentleman of twenty-eight, “tall, +fair, considered agreeable.” Really the modesty of the matrimonial +advertiser teaches to us ordinary mortals quite a beautiful lesson. I +know instinctively that were anybody to ask me suddenly: + +“Do you call yourself an agreeable man?” I should answer promptly: + +“An agreeable man! Of course I’m an agreeable man. What silly questions +you do ask!” If he persisted in arguing the matter, saying: + +“But there are people who do not consider you an agreeable man.” I +should get angry with him. + +“Oh, they think that, do they?” I should say. “Well, you tell them from +me, with my compliments, that they are a set of blithering idiots. Not +agreeable! You show me the man who says I’m not agreeable. I’ll soon +let him know whether I’m agreeable or not.” + +These young men seeking a wife are silent on the subject of their own +virtues. Such are for others to discover. The matrimonial advertiser +confines himself to a simple statement of fact: “he is considered +agreeable.” He is domestically inclined, and in receipt of a good +income. He is desirous of meeting a lady of serious disposition, with +view to matrimony. If possessed of means—well, it is a trifle hardly +worth considering one way or the other. He does not insist upon it; on +the other hand he does not exclude ladies of means; the main idea is +matrimony. + +It is sad to reflect upon a young lady, said to be good-looking (let us +say good-looking and be done with it: a neighbourhood does not rise up +and declare a girl good-looking if she is not good-looking, that is only +her modest way of putting it), let us say a young lady, good-looking, +well-educated, of affectionate disposition—it is undeniably sad to +reflect that such an one, matrimonially inclined, should be compelled to +have recourse to the columns of a matrimonial journal. What are the +young men in the neighbourhood thinking of? What more do they want? Is +it Venus come to life again with ten thousand a year that they are +waiting for! It makes me angry with my own sex reading these +advertisements. And when one thinks of the girls that do get married! + +But life is a mystery. The fact remains: here is the ideal wife seeking +in vain for a husband. And here, immediately underneath—I will not say +the ideal husband, he may have faults; none of us are perfect, but as men +go a decided acquisition to any domestic hearth, an agreeable gentleman, +fond of home life, none of your gad-abouts—calls aloud to the four winds +for a wife—any sort of a wife, provided she be of a serious disposition. +In his despair, he has grown indifferent to all other considerations. +“Is there in this world,” he has said to himself, “one unmarried woman, +willing to marry me, an agreeable man, in receipt of a good income.” +Possibly enough this twain have passed one another in the street, have +sat side by side in the same tram-car, never guessing, each one, that the +other was the very article of which they were in want to make life +beautiful. + +Mistresses in search of a servant, not so much with the idea of getting +work out of her, rather with the object of making her happy, advertise on +one page. On the opposite page, domestic treasures—disciples of Carlyle, +apparently, with a passionate love of work for its own sake—are seeking +situations, not so much with the desire of gain as with the hope of +finding openings where they may enjoy the luxury of feeling they are +leading useful lives. These philanthropic mistresses, these toil-loving +hand-maidens, have lived side by side in the same town for years, never +knowing one another. + +So it is with these poor European peoples. They pass me in the street. +They do not guess that I am ready and willing to take them under my care, +to teach them common sense with a smattering of intelligence—to be, as +one might say, a father to them. They look at me. There is nothing +about me to tell them that I know what is good for them better than they +do themselves. In the fairy tales the wise man wore a conical hat and a +long robe with twiddly things all round the edge. You knew he was a +clever man. It avoided the necessity of explanation. Unfortunately, the +fashion has gone out. We wise men have to wear just ordinary clothes. +Nobody knows we are wise men. Even when we tell them so, they don’t +believe it. This it is that makes our task the more difficult. + +One of the first things I should take in hand, were European affairs +handed over to my control, would be the rearrangement of the Carnival. +As matters are, the Carnival takes place all over Europe in February. At +Nice, in Spain, or in Italy, it may be occasionally possible to feel you +want to dance about the streets in thin costume during February. But in +more northern countries during Carnival time I have seen only one +sensible masker; he was a man who had got himself up as a diver. It was +in Antwerp. The rain was pouring down in torrents; a cheery, boisterous +John Bull sort of an east wind was blustering through the streets at the +rate of fifteen miles an hour. Pierrots, with frozen hands, were blowing +blue noses. An elderly Cupid had borrowed an umbrella from a café and +was waiting for a tram. A very little devil was crying with the cold, +and wiping his eyes with the end of his own tail. Every doorway was +crowded with shivering maskers. The diver alone walked erect, the water +streaming from him. + +February is not the month for open air masquerading. The “confetti,” +which has come to be nothing but coloured paper cut into small discs, is +a sodden mass. When a lump of it strikes you in the eye, your instinct +is not to laugh gaily, but to find out the man who threw it and to hit +him back. This is not the true spirit of Carnival. The marvel is that, +in spite of the almost invariably adverse weather, these Carnivals still +continue. In Belgium, where Romanism still remains the dominant +religion, Carnival maintains itself stronger than elsewhere in Northern +Europe. + +At one small town, Binche, near the French border, it holds uninterrupted +sway for three days and two nights, during which time the whole of the +population, swelled by visitors from twenty miles round, shouts, romps, +eats and drinks and dances. After which the visitors are packed like +sardines into railway trains. They pin their tickets to their coats and +promptly go to sleep. At every station the railway officials stumble up +and down the trains with lanterns. The last feeble effort of the more +wakeful reveller, before he adds himself to the heap of snoring humanity +on the floor of the railway carriage, is to change the tickets of a +couple of his unconscious companions. In this way gentlemen for the east +are dragged out by the legs at junctions, and packed into trains going +west; while southern fathers are shot out in the chill dawn at lonely +northern stations, to find themselves greeted with enthusiasm by other +people’s families. + +At Binche, they say—I have not counted them myself—that thirty thousand +maskers can be seen dancing at the same time. When they are not dancing +they are throwing oranges at one another. The houses board up their +windows. The restaurants take down their mirrors and hide away the +glasses. If I went masquerading at Binche I should go as a man in +armour, period Henry the Seventh. + +“Doesn’t it hurt,” I asked a lady who had been there, “having oranges +thrown at you? Which sort do they use, speaking generally, those fine +juicy ones—Javas I think you call them—or the little hard brand with +skins like a nutmeg-grater? And if both sorts are used indiscriminately, +which do you personally prefer?” + +“The smart people,” she answered, “they are the same everywhere—they must +be extravagant—they use the Java orange. If it hits you in the back I +prefer the Java orange. It is more messy than the other, but it does not +leave you with that curious sensation of having been temporarily stunned. +Most people, of course, make use of the small hard orange. If you duck +in time, and so catch it on the top of your head, it does not hurt so +much as you would think. If, however, it hits you on a tender +place—well, myself, I always find that a little sal volatile, with old +cognac—half and half, you understand—is about the best thing. But it +only happens once a year,” she added. + +Nearly every town gives prizes for the best group of maskers. In some +cases the first prize amounts to as much as two hundred pounds. The +butchers, the bakers, the candlestick makers, join together and compete. +They arrive in wagons, each group with its band. Free trade is +encouraged. Each neighbouring town and village “dumps” its load of +picturesque merry-makers. + +It is in these smaller towns that the spirit of King Carnival finds +happiest expression. Almost every third inhabitant takes part in the +fun. In Brussels and the larger towns the thing appears ridiculous. A +few hundred maskers force their way with difficulty through thousands of +dull-clad spectators, looking like a Spanish river in the summer time, a +feeble stream, dribbling through acres of muddy bank. At Charleroi, the +centre of the Belgian Black Country, the chief feature of the Carnival is +the dancing of the children. A space is specially roped off for them. + +If by chance the sun is kind enough to shine, the sight is a pretty one. +How they love the dressing up and the acting, these small mites! One +young hussy—she could hardly have been more than ten—was gotten up as a +haughty young lady. Maybe some elder sister had served as a model. She +wore a tremendous wig of flaxen hair, a hat that I guarantee would have +made its mark even at Ascot on the Cup Day, a skirt that trailed two +yards behind her, a pair of what had once been white kid gloves, and a +blue silk parasol. Dignity! I have seen the offended barmaid, I have +met the chorus girl—not by appointment, please don’t misunderstand me, +merely as a spectator—up the river on Sunday. But never have I witnessed +in any human being so much hauteur to the pound _avoir-dupois_ as was +carried through the streets of Charleroi by that small brat. Companions +of other days, mere vulgar boys and girls, claimed acquaintance with her. +She passed them with a stare of such utter disdain that it sent them +tumbling over one another backwards. By the time they had recovered +themselves sufficiently to think of an old tin kettle lying handy in the +gutter she had turned the corner. + +Two miserably clad urchins, unable to scrape together the few _sous_ +necessary for the hire of a rag or two, had nevertheless determined not +to be altogether out of it. They had managed to borrow a couple of white +blouses—not what you would understand by a white blouse, dear Madame, a +dainty thing of frills and laces, but the coarse white sack the street +sweeper wears over his clothes. They had also borrowed a couple of +brooms. Ridiculous little objects they looked, the tiny head of each +showing above the great white shroud as gravely they walked, the one +behind the other, sweeping the mud into the gutter. They also were of +the Carnival, playing at being scavengers. + +Another quaint sight I witnessed. The “serpentin” is a feature of the +Belgian Carnival. It is a strip of coloured paper, some dozen yards +long, perhaps. You fling it as you would a lassoo, entangling the head +of some passer-by. Naturally, the object most aimed at by the Belgian +youth is the Belgian maiden. And, naturally also, the maiden who finds +herself most entangled is the maiden who—to use again the language of the +matrimonial advertiser—“is considered good-looking.” The serpentin about +her head is the “feather in her cap” of the Belgian maiden on Carnival +Day. Coming suddenly round the corner I almost ran into a girl. Her +back was towards me. It was a quiet street. She had half a dozen of +these serpentins. Hurriedly, with trembling hands, she was twisting them +round and round her own head. I looked at her as I passed. She flushed +scarlet. Poor little snub-nosed pasty-faced woman! I wish she had not +seen me. I could have bought sixpenny-worth, followed her, and tormented +her with them; while she would have pretended indignation—sought, +discreetly, to escape from me. + +Down South, where the blood flows quicker, King Carnival is, indeed, a +jolly old soul. In Munich he reigns for six weeks, the end coming with a +mad two days revel in the streets. During the whole of the period, folks +in ordinary, every-day costume are regarded as curiosities; people wonder +what they are up to. From the Grafin to the Dienstmädchen, from the Herr +Professor to the “Piccolo,” as they term the small artist that answers to +our page boy, the business of Munich is dancing, somewhere, somehow, in a +fancy costume. Every theatre clears away the stage, every café crowds +its chairs and tables into corners, the very streets are cleared for +dancing. Munich goes mad. + +Munich is always a little mad. The maddest ball I ever danced at was in +Munich. I went there with a Harvard University professor. He had been +told what these balls were like. Ever seeking knowledge of all things, +he determined to take the matter up for himself and examine it. The +writer also must ever be learning. I agreed to accompany him. We had +not intended to dance. Our idea was that we could be indulgent +spectators, regarding from some coign of vantage the antics of the +foolish crowd. The professor was clad as became a professor. Myself, I +wore a simply-cut frock-coat, with trousering in French grey. The +doorkeeper explained to us that this was a costume ball; he was sorry, +but gentlemen could only be admitted in evening dress or in masquerade. + +It was half past one in the morning. We had sat up late on purpose; we +had gone without our dinner; we had walked two miles. The professor +suggested pinning up the tails of his clerically-cut coat and turning in +his waistcoat. The doorkeeper feared it would not be quite the same +thing. Besides, my French grey trousers refused to adapt themselves. +The doorkeeper proposed our hiring a costume—a little speculation of his +own; gentlemen found it simpler sometimes, especially married gentlemen, +to hire a costume in this manner, changing back into sober garments +before returning home. It reduced the volume of necessary explanation. + +“Have you anything, my good man,” said the professor, “anything that +would effect a complete disguise?” + +The doorkeeper had the very thing—a Chinese arrangement, with combined +mask and wig. It fitted neatly over the head, and was provided with a +simple but ingenious piece of mechanism by means of which much could be +done with the pigtail. Myself the doorkeeper hid from view under the +cowl of a Carmelite monk. + +“I do hope nobody recognises us,” whispered my friend the professor as we +entered. + +I can only hope sincerely that they did not. I do not wish to talk about +myself. That would be egotism. But the mystery of the professor +troubles me to this day. A grave, earnest gentleman, the father of a +family, I saw him with my own eyes put that ridiculous pasteboard mask +over his head. Later on—a good deal later on—I found myself walking +again with him through silent star-lit streets. Where he had been in the +interval, and who then was the strange creature under the Chinaman’s +mask, will always remain to me an unsolved problem. + + + + +DO WE LIE A-BED TOO LATE? + + +IT was in Paris, many years ago, that I fell by chance into this habit of +early rising. My night—by reasons that I need not enter into—had been a +troubled one. Tired of the hot bed that gave no sleep, I rose and +dressed myself, crept down the creaking stairs, experiencing the +sensations of a burglar new to his profession, unbolted the great door of +the hotel, and passed out into an unknown, silent city, bathed in a +mysterious soft light. Since then, this strange sweet city of the dawn +has never ceased to call to me. It may be in London, in Paris again, in +Brussels, Berlin, Vienna, that I have gone to sleep, but if perchance I +wake before the returning tide of human life has dimmed its glories with +the mists and vapours of the noisy day, I know that beyond my window +blind the fairy city, as I saw it first so many years ago—this city that +knows no tears, no sorrow, through which there creeps no evil thing; this +city of quiet vistas, fading into hope; this city of far-off voices +whispering peace; this city of the dawn that still is young—invites me to +talk with it awhile before the waking hours drive it before them, and +with a sigh it passes whence it came. + +It is the great city’s one hour of purity, of dignity. The very +rag-picker, groping with her filthy hands among the ashes, instead of an +object of contempt, moves from door to door an accusing Figure, her thin +soiled garments, her bent body, her scarred face, hideous with the wounds +of poverty, an eloquent indictment of smug Injustice, sleeping behind its +deaf shutters. Yet even into her dim brain has sunk the peace that fills +for this brief hour the city. This, too, shall have its end, my sister! +Men and women were not born to live on the husks that fill the pails +outside the rich man’s door. Courage a little while longer, you and +yours. Your rheumy eyes once were bright, your thin locks once soft and +wavy, your poor bent back once straight; and maybe, as they tell you in +their gilded churches, this bulging sack shall be lifted from your weary +shoulders, your misshapen limbs be straight again. You pass not +altogether unheeded through these empty streets. Not all the eyes of the +universe are sleeping. + +The little seamstress, hurrying to her early work! A little later she +will be one of the foolish crowd, joining in the foolish laughter, in the +coarse jests of the work-room: but as yet the hot day has not claimed +her. The work-room is far beyond, the home of mean cares and sordid +struggles far behind. To her, also, in this moment are the sweet +thoughts of womanhood. She puts down her bag, rests herself upon a seat. +If all the day were dawn, this city of the morning always with us! A +neighbouring clock chimes forth the hour. She starts up from her dream +and hurries on—to the noisy work-room. + +A pair of lovers cross the park, holding each other’s hands. They will +return later in the day, but there will be another expression in their +eyes, another meaning in the pressure of their hands. Now the purity of +the morning is with them. + +Some fat, middle-aged clerk comes puffing into view: his ridiculous +little figure very podgy. He stops to take off his hat and mop his bald +head with his handkerchief: even to him the morning lends romance. His +fleshy face changes almost as one looks at him. One sees again the lad +with his vague hopes, his absurd ambitions. + +There is a statue of Aphrodite in one of the smaller Paris parks. Twice +in the same week, without particularly meaning it, I found myself early +in the morning standing in front of this statue gazing listlessly at it, +as one does when in dreamy mood; and on both occasions, turning to go, I +encountered the same man, also gazing at it with, apparently, listless +eyes. He was an uninteresting looking man—possibly he thought the same +of me. From his dress he might have been a well-to-do tradesman, a minor +Government official, doctor, or lawyer. Quite ten years later I paid my +third visit to the same statue at about the same hour. This time he was +there before me. I was hidden from him by some bushes. He glanced round +but did not see me; and then he did a curious thing. Placing his hands +on the top of the pedestal, which may have been some seven feet in +height, he drew himself up, and kissed very gently, almost reverentially, +the foot of the statue, begrimed though it was with the city’s dirt. Had +he been some long-haired student of the Latin Quarter one would not have +been so astonished. But he was such a very commonplace, quite +respectable looking man. Afterwards he drew a pipe from his pocket, +carefully filled and lighted it, took his umbrella from the seat where it +had been lying, and walked away. + +Had it been their meeting-place long ago? Had he been wont to tell her, +gazing at her with lover’s eyes, how like she was to the statue? The +French sculptor has not to consider Mrs. Grundy. Maybe, the lady, +raising her eyes, had been confused; perhaps for a moment angry—some +little milliner or governess, one supposes. In France the _jeune fille_ +of good family does not meet her lover unattended. What had happened? +Or was it but the vagrant fancy of a middle-aged bourgeois seeking in +imagination the romance that reality so rarely gives us, weaving his love +dream round his changeless statue? + +In one of Ibsen’s bitter comedies the lovers agree to part while they are +still young, never to see each other in the flesh again. Into the future +each will bear away the image of the other, godlike, radiant with the +glory of youth and love; each will cherish the memory of a loved one who +shall be beautiful always. That their parting may not appear such wild +nonsense as at first it strikes us, Ibsen shows us other lovers who have +married in the orthodox fashion. She was all that a mistress should be. +They speak of her as they first knew her fifteen years ago, when every +man was at her feet. He then was a young student, burning with fine +ideals, with enthusiasm for all the humanities. + +They enter. + +What did you expect? Fifteen years have passed—fifteen years of struggle +with the grim realities. He is fat and bald. Eleven children have to be +provided for. High ideals will not even pay the bootmaker. To exist you +have to fight for mean ends with mean weapons. And the sweet girl +heroine! Now the worried mother of eleven brats! One rings down the +curtain amid Satanic laughter. + +That is why, for one reason among so many, I love this mystic morning +light. It has a strange power of revealing the beauty that is hidden +from us by the coarser beams of the full day. These worn men and women, +grown so foolish looking, so unromantic; these artisans and petty clerks +plodding to their monotonous day’s work; these dull-eyed women of the +people on their way to market to haggle over _sous_, to argue and contend +over paltry handfuls of food. In this magic morning light the disguising +body becomes transparent. They have grown beautiful, not ugly, with the +years of toil and hardship; these lives, lived so patiently, are +consecrated to the service of the world. Joy, hope, pleasure—they have +done with all such, life for them is over. Yet they labour, ceaselessly, +uncomplainingly. It is for the children. + +One morning, near Brussels, I encountered a cart of faggots, drawn by a +hound so lean that stroking him might have hurt a dainty hand. I was +shocked—angry, till I noticed his fellow beast of burden pushing the cart +from behind. Such a scarecrow of an old woman! There was little to +choose between them. I walked with them a little way. She lived near +Waterloo. All day she gathered wood in the great forest, and starting at +three o’clock each morning, the two lean creatures between them dragged +the cart nine miles to Brussels, returning when they had sold their load. +With luck she might reckon on a couple of francs. I asked her if she +could not find something else to do. + +Yes, it was possible, but for the little one, her grandchild. Folks will +not employ old women burdened with grandchildren. + +You fair, dainty ladies, who would never know it was morning if somebody +did not enter to pull up the blind and tell you so! You do well not to +venture out in this magic morning light. You would look so plain—almost +ugly, by the side of these beautiful women. + +It is curious the attraction the Church has always possessed for the +marketing classes. Christ drove them from the Temple, but still, in +every continental city, they cluster round its outer walls. It makes a +charming picture on a sunny morning, the great cathedral with its massive +shadow forming the background; splashed about its feet, like a parterre +of gay flowers around the trunk of some old tree, the women, young girls +in their many coloured costumes, sitting before their piled-up baskets of +green vegetables, of shining fruits. + +In Brussels the chief market is held on the Grande Place. The great +gilded houses have looked down upon much the same scene every morning +these four hundred years. In summer time it commences about half-past +four; by five o’clock it is a roaring hive, the great city round about +still sleeping. + +Here comes the thrifty housewife of the poor, to whom the difference of a +tenth of a penny in the price of a cabbage is all-important, and the much +harassed keeper of the petty _pension_. There are houses in Brussels +where they will feed you, light you, sleep you, wait on you, for two +francs a day. Withered old ladies, ancient governesses, who will teach +you for forty centimes an hour, gather round these ricketty tables, wolf +up the thin soup, grumble at the watery coffee, help themselves with +unladylike greediness to the potato pie. It must need careful +housewifery to keep these poor creatures on two francs a day and make a +profit for yourself. So “Madame,” the much-grumbled-at, who has gone to +bed about twelve, rises a little before five, makes her way down with her +basket. Thus a few _sous_ may be saved upon the day’s economies. + +Sometimes it is a mere child who is the little housekeeper. One thinks +that perhaps this early training in the art of haggling may not be good +for her. Already there is a hard expression in the childish eyes, mean +lines about the little mouth. The finer qualities of humanity are +expensive luxuries, not to be afforded by the poor. + +They overwork their patient dogs, and underfeed them. During the two +hours’ market the poor beasts, still fastened to their little “chariots,” +rest in the open space about the neighbouring Bourse. They snatch at +what you throw them; they do not even thank you with a wag of the tail. +Gratitude! Politeness! What mean you? We have not heard of such. We +only work. Some of them amid all the din lie sleeping between their +shafts. Some are licking one another’s sores. One would they were +better treated; alas! their owners, likewise, are overworked and +underfed, housed in kennels no better. But if the majority in every +society were not overworked and underfed and meanly housed, why, then the +minority could not be underworked and overfed and housed luxuriously. +But this is talk to which no respectable reader can be expected to +listen. + +They are one babel of bargaining, these markets. The purchaser selects a +cauliflower. Fortunately, cauliflowers have no feelings, or probably it +would burst into tears at the expression with which it is regarded. It +is impossible that any lady should desire such a cauliflower. Still, out +of mere curiosity, she would know the price—that is, if the owner of the +cauliflower is not too much ashamed of it to name a price. + +The owner of the cauliflower suggests six _sous_. The thing is too +ridiculous for argument. The purchaser breaks into a laugh. + +The owner of the cauliflower is stung. She points out the beauties of +that cauliflower. Apparently it is the cauliflower out of all her stock +she loves the best; a better cauliflower never lived; if there were more +cauliflowers in the world like this particular cauliflower things might +be different. She gives a sketch of the cauliflower’s career, from its +youth upwards. Hard enough it will be for her when the hour for parting +from it comes. If the other lady has not sufficient knowledge of +cauliflowers to appreciate it, will she kindly not paw it about, but put +it down and go away, and never let the owner of the cauliflower see her +again. + +The other lady, more as a friend than as a purchaser, points out the +cauliflower’s defects. She wishes well to the owner of the cauliflower, +and would like to teach her something about her business. A lady who +thinks such a cauliflower worth six _sous_ can never hope to succeed as a +cauliflower vendor. Has she really taken the trouble to examine the +cauliflower for herself, or has love made her blind to its shortcomings? + +The owner of the cauliflower is too indignant to reply. She snatches it +away, appears to be comforting it, replaces it in the basket. The other +lady is grieved at human obstinacy and stupidity in general. If the +owner of the cauliflower had had any sense she would have asked four +_sous_. Eventually business is done at five. + +It is the custom everywhere abroad—asking the price of a thing is simply +opening conversation. A lady told me that, the first day she began +housekeeping in Florence, she handed over to a poulterer for a chicken +the price he had demanded—with protestations that he was losing on the +transaction, but wanted, for family reasons, apparently, to get rid of +the chicken. He stood for half a minute staring at her, and then, being +an honest sort of man, threw in a pigeon. + +Foreign housekeepers starting business in London appear hurt when our +tradesmen decline to accept half-a-crown for articles marked +three-and-six. + +“Then why mark it only three-and-sixpence?” is the foreign housekeeper’s +argument. + + + + +SHOULD MARRIED MEN PLAY GOLF? + + +THAT we Englishmen attach too much importance to sport goes without +saying—or, rather, it has been said so often as to have become a +commonplace. One of these days some reforming English novelist will +write a book, showing the evil effects of over-indulgence in sport: the +neglected business, the ruined home, the slow but sure sapping of the +brain—what there may have been of it in the beginning—leading to +semi-imbecility and yearly increasing obesity. + +A young couple, I once heard of, went for their honeymoon to Scotland. +The poor girl did not know he was a golfer (he had wooed and won her +during a period of idleness enforced by a sprained shoulder), or maybe +she would have avoided Scotland. The idea they started with was that of +a tour. The second day the man went out for a stroll by himself. At +dinner-time he observed, with a far-away look in his eyes, that it seemed +a pretty spot they had struck, and suggested their staying there another +day. The next morning after breakfast he borrowed a club from the hotel +porter, and remarked that he would take a walk while she finished doing +her hair. He said it amused him, swinging a club while he walked. He +returned in time for lunch and seemed moody all the afternoon. He said +the air suited him, and urged that they should linger yet another day. + +She was young and inexperienced, and thought, maybe, it was liver. She +had heard much about liver from her father. The next morning he borrowed +more clubs, and went out, this time before breakfast, returning to a late +and not over sociable dinner. That was the end of their honeymoon so far +as she was concerned. He meant well, but the thing had gone too far. +The vice had entered into his blood, and the smell of the links drove out +all other considerations. + +We are most of us familiar, I take it, with the story of the golfing +parson, who could not keep from swearing when the balls went wrong. + +“Golf and the ministry don’t seem to go together,” his friend told him. +“Take my advice before it’s too late, and give it up, Tammas.” + +A few months later Tammas met his friend again. + +“You were right, Jamie,” cried the parson cheerily, “they didna run well +in harness; golf and the meenistry, I hae followed your advice: I hae +gi’en it oop.” + +“Then what are ye doing with that sack of clubs?” inquired Jamie. + +“What am I doing with them?” repeated the puzzled Tammas. “Why I am +going to play golf with them.” A light broke upon him. “Great Heavens, +man!” he continued, “ye didna’ think ’twas the golf I’d gi’en oop?” + +The Englishman does not understand play. He makes a life-long labour of +his sport, and to it sacrifices mind and body. The health resorts of +Europe—to paraphrase a famous saying that nobody appears to have +said—draw half their profits from the playing fields of Eton and +elsewhere. In Swiss and German kurhausen enormously fat men bear down +upon you and explain to you that once they were the champion sprinters or +the high-jump representatives of their university—men who now hold on to +the bannisters and groan as they haul themselves upstairs. Consumptive +men, between paroxysms of coughing, tell you of the goals they scored +when they were half-backs or forwards of extraordinary ability. +Ex-light-weight amateur pugilists, with the figure now of an American +roll-top desk, butt you into a corner of the billiard-room, and, +surprised they cannot get as near you as they would desire, whisper to +you the secret of avoiding the undercut by the swiftness of the backward +leap. Broken-down tennis players, one-legged skaters, dropsical +gentlemen-riders, are to be met with hobbling on crutches along every +highway of the Engadine. + +They are pitiable objects. Never having learnt to read anything but the +sporting papers, books are of no use to them. They never wasted much of +their youth on thought, and, apparently, have lost the knack of it. They +don’t care for art, and Nature only suggests to them the things they can +no longer do. The snow-clad mountain reminds them that once they were +daring tobogannists; the undulating common makes them sad because they +can no longer handle a golf-club; by the riverside they sit down and tell +you of the salmon they caught before they caught rheumatic fever; birds +only make them long for guns; music raises visions of the local +cricket-match of long ago, enlivened by the local band; a picturesque +estaminet, with little tables spread out under the vines, recalls bitter +memories of ping-pong. One is sorry for them, but their conversation is +not exhilarating. The man who has other interests in life beyond sport +is apt to find their reminiscences monotonous; while to one another they +do not care to talk. One gathers that they do not altogether believe one +another. + +The foreigner is taking kindly to our sports; one hopes he will be +forewarned by our example and not overdo the thing. At present, one is +bound to admit, he shows no sign of taking sport too seriously. Football +is gaining favour more and more throughout Europe. But yet the Frenchman +has not got it out of his head that the _coup_ to practise is kicking the +ball high into the air and catching it upon his head. He would rather +catch the ball upon his head than score a goal. If he can manœuvre the +ball away into a corner, kick it up into the air twice running, and each +time catch it on his head, he does not seem to care what happens after +that. Anybody can have the ball; he has had his game and is happy. + +They talk of introducing cricket into Belgium; I shall certainly try to +be present at the opening game. I am afraid that, until he learns from +experience, the Belgian fielder will stop cricket balls with his head. +That the head is the proper thing with which to play ball appears to be +in his blood. My head is round, he argues, and hard, just like the ball +itself; what part of the human frame more fit and proper with which to +meet and stop a ball. + +Golf has not yet caught on, but tennis is firmly established from St. +Petersburg to Bordeaux. The German, with the thoroughness characteristic +of him, is working hard. University professors, stout majors, rising +early in the morning, hire boys and practise back-handers and +half-volleys. But to the Frenchman, as yet, it is a game. He plays it +in a happy, merry fashion, that is shocking to English eyes. + +Your partner’s service rather astonishes you. An occasional yard or so +beyond the line happens to anyone, but this man’s object appears to be to +break windows. You feel you really must remonstrate, when the joyous +laughter and tumultuous applause of the spectators explain the puzzle to +you. He has not been trying to serve; he has been trying to hit a man in +the next court who is stooping down to tie up his shoe-lace. With his +last ball he has succeeded. He has hit the man in the small of the back, +and has bowled him over. The unanimous opinion of the surrounding +critics is that the ball could not possibly have been better placed. A +Doherty has never won greater applause from the crowd. Even the man who +has been hit appears pleased; it shows what a Frenchman can do when he +does take up a game. + +But French honour demands revenge. He forgets his shoe, he forgets his +game. He gathers together all the balls that he can find; his balls, +your balls, anybody’s balls that happen to be handy. And then commences +the return match. At this point it is best to crouch down under shelter +of the net. Most of the players round about adopt this plan; the more +timid make for the club-house, and, finding themselves there, order +coffee and light up cigarettes. After a while both players appear to be +satisfied. The other players then gather round to claim their balls. +This makes a good game by itself. The object is to get as many balls as +you can, your own and other people’s—for preference other people’s—and +run off with them round the courts, followed by whooping claimants. + +In the course of half-an-hour or so, when everybody is dead beat, the +game—the original game—is resumed. You demand the score; your partner +promptly says it is “forty-fifteen.” Both your opponents rush up to the +net, and apparently there is going to be a duel. It is only a friendly +altercation; they very much doubt its being “forty-fifteen.” +“Fifteen-forty” they could believe; they suggest it as a compromise. The +discussion is concluded by calling it deuce. As it is rare for a game to +proceed without some such incident occurring in the middle of it, the +score generally is deuce. This avoids heart-burning; nobody wins a set +and nobody loses. The one game generally suffices for the afternoon. + +To the earnest player, it is also confusing to miss your partner +occasionally—to turn round and find that he is talking to a man. Nobody +but yourself takes the slightest objection to his absence. The other +side appear to regard it as a good opportunity to score. Five minutes +later he resumes the game. His friend comes with him, also the dog of +his friend. The dog is welcomed with enthusiasm; all balls are returned +to the dog. Until the dog is tired you do not get a look in. But all +this will no doubt soon be changed. There are some excellent French and +Belgian players; from them their compatriots will gradually learn higher +ideals. The Frenchman is young in the game. As the right conception of +the game grows upon him, he will also learn to keep the balls lower. + +I suppose it is the continental sky. It is so blue, so beautiful; it +naturally attracts one. Anyhow, the fact remains that most tennis +players on the Continent, whether English or foreign, have a tendency to +aim the ball direct at Heaven. At an English club in Switzerland there +existed in my days a young Englishman who was really a wonderful player. +To get the ball past him was almost an impossibility. It was his return +that was weak. He only had one stroke; the ball went a hundred feet or +so into the air and descended in his opponent’s court. The other man +would stand watching it, a little speck in the Heavens, growing gradually +bigger and bigger as it neared the earth. Newcomers would chatter to +him, thinking he had detected a balloon or an eagle. He would wave them +aside, explain to them that he would talk to them later, after the +arrival of the ball. It would fall with a thud at his feet, rise another +twenty yards or so and again descend. When it was at the proper height +he would hit it back over the net, and the next moment it would be +mounting the sky again. At tournaments I have seen that young man, with +tears in his eyes, pleading to be given an umpire. Every umpire had +fled. They hid behind trees, borrowed silk hats and umbrellas and +pretended they were visitors—any device, however mean, to avoid the task +of umpiring for that young man. Provided his opponent did not go to +sleep or get cramp, one game might last all day. Anyone could return his +balls; but, as I have said, to get a ball past him was almost an +impossibility. He invariably won; the other man, after an hour or so, +would get mad and try to lose. It was his only chance of dinner. + +It is a pretty sight, generally speaking, a tennis ground abroad. The +women pay more attention to their costumes than do our lady players. The +men are usually in spotless white. The ground is often charmingly +situated, the club-house picturesque; there is always laughter and +merriment. The play may not be so good to watch, but the picture is +delightful. I accompanied a man a little while ago to his club on the +outskirts of Brussels. The ground was bordered by a wood on one side, +and surrounded on the other three by _petites fermes_—allotments, as we +should call them in England, worked by the peasants themselves. + +It was a glorious spring afternoon. The courts were crowded. The red +earth and the green grass formed a background against which the women, in +their new Parisian toilets, under their bright parasols, stood out like +wondrous bouquets of moving flowers. The whole atmosphere was a +delightful mingling of idle gaiety, flirtation, and graceful +sensuousness. A modern Watteau would have seized upon the scene with +avidity. + +Just beyond—separated by the almost invisible wire fencing—a group of +peasants were working in the field. An old woman and a young girl, with +ropes about their shoulders, were drawing a harrow, guided by a withered +old scarecrow of a man. They paused for a moment at the wire fencing, +and looked through. It was an odd contrast; the two worlds divided by +that wire fencing—so slight, almost invisible. The girl swept the sweat +from her face with her hand; the woman pushed back her grey locks +underneath the handkerchief knotted about her head; the old man +straightened himself with some difficulty. So they stood, for perhaps a +minute, gazing with quiet, passionless faces through that slight fencing, +that a push from their work-hardened hands might have levelled. + +Was there any thought, I wonder, passing through their brains? The young +girl—she was a handsome creature in spite of her disfiguring garments. +The woman—it was a wonderfully fine face: clear, calm eyes, deep-set +under a square broad brow. The withered old scarecrow—ever sowing the +seed in the spring of the fruit that others shall eat. + +The old man bent again over the guiding ropes: gave the word. The team +moved forward up the hill. It is Anatole France, I think, who says: +Society is based upon the patience of the poor. + + + + +ARE EARLY MARRIAGES A MISTAKE? + + +I AM chary nowadays of offering counsel in connection with subjects +concerning which I am not and cannot be an authority. Long ago I once +took upon myself to write a paper about babies. It did not aim to be a +textbook on the subject. It did not even claim to exhaust the topic. I +was willing that others, coming after me, should continue the +argument—that is if, upon reflection, they were still of opinion there +was anything more to be said. I was pleased with the article. I went +out of my way to obtain an early copy of the magazine in which it +appeared, on purpose to show it to a lady friend of mine. She was the +possessor of one or two babies of her own, specimens in no way +remarkable, though she herself, as was natural enough, did her best to +boom them. I thought it might be helpful to her: the views and +observations, not of a rival fancier, who would be prejudiced, but of an +intelligent amateur. I put the magazine into her hands, opened at the +proper place. + +“Read it through carefully and quietly,” I said; “don’t let anything +distract you. Have a pencil and a bit of paper ready at your side, and +note down any points upon which you would like further information. If +there is anything you think I have missed out let me know. It may be +that here and there you will be disagreeing with me. If so, do not +hesitate to mention it, I shall not be angry. If a demand arises I shall +very likely issue an enlarged and improved edition of this paper in the +form of a pamphlet, in which case hints and suggestions that to you may +appear almost impertinent will be of distinct help to me.” + +“I haven’t got a pencil,” she said; “what’s it all about?” + +“It’s about babies,” I explained, and I lent her a pencil. + +That is another thing I have learnt. Never lend a pencil to a woman if +you ever want to see it again. She has three answers to your request for +its return. The first, that she gave it back to you and that you put it +in your pocket, and that it’s there now, and that if it isn’t it ought to +be. The second, that you never lent it to her. The third, that she +wishes people would not lend her pencils and then clamour for them back, +just when she has something else far more important to think about. + +“What do you know about babies?” she demanded. + +“If you will read the paper,” I replied, “you will see for yourself. +It’s all there.” + +She flicked over the pages contemptuously. + +“There doesn’t seem much of it?” she retorted. + +“It is condensed,” I pointed out to her. + +“I am glad it is short. All right, I’ll read it,” she agreed. + +I thought my presence might disturb her, so went out into the garden. I +wanted her to get the full benefit of it. I crept back now and again to +peep through the open window. She did not seem to be making many notes. +But I heard her making little noises to herself. When I saw she had +reached the last page, I re-entered the room. + +“Well?” I said. + +“Is it meant to be funny,” she demanded, “or is it intended to be taken +seriously?” + +“There may be flashes of humour here and there—” + +She did not wait for me to finish. + +“Because if it’s meant to be funny,” she said, “I don’t think it is at +all funny. And if it is intended to be serious, there’s one thing very +clear, and that is that you are not a mother.” + +With the unerring instinct of the born critic she had divined my one weak +point. Other objections raised against me I could have met. But that +one stinging reproach was unanswerable. It has made me, as I have +explained, chary of tendering advice on matters outside my own department +of life. Otherwise, every year, about Valentine’s day, there is much +that I should like to say to my good friends the birds. I want to put it +to them seriously. Is not the month of February just a little too early? +Of course, their answer would be the same as in the case of my motherly +friend. + +“Oh, what do you know about it? you are not a bird.” + +I know I am not a bird, but that is the very reason why they should +listen to me. I bring a fresh mind to bear upon the subject. I am not +tied down by bird convention. February, my dear friends—in these +northern climes of ours at all events—is much too early. You have to +build in a high wind, and nothing, believe me, tries a lady’s temper more +than being blown about. Nature is nature, and womenfolk, my dear sirs, +are the same all the world over, whether they be birds or whether they be +human. I am an older person than most of you, and I speak with the +weight of experience. + +If I were going to build a house with my wife, I should not choose a +season of the year when the bricks and planks and things were liable to +be torn out of her hand, her skirts blown over her head, and she left +clinging for dear life to a scaffolding pole. I know the feminine biped +and, you take it from me, that is not her notion of a honeymoon. In +April or May, the sun shining, the air balmy—when, after carrying up to +her a load or two of bricks, and a hod or two of mortar, we could knock +off work for a few minutes without fear of the whole house being swept +away into the next street—could sit side by side on the top of a wall, +our legs dangling down, and peck and morsel together; after which I could +whistle a bit to her—then housebuilding might be a pleasure. + +The swallows are wisest; June is their idea, and a very good idea, too. +In a mountain village in the Tyrol, early one summer, I had the +opportunity of watching very closely the building of a swallow’s nest. +After coffee, the first morning, I stepped out from the great, cool, dark +passage of the wirtschaft into the blazing sunlight, and, for no +particular reason, pulled-to the massive door behind me. While filling +my pipe, a swallow almost brushed by me, then wheeled round again, and +took up a position on the fence only a few yards from me. He was +carrying what to him was an exceptionally large and heavy brick. He put +it down beside him on the fence, and called out something which I could +not understand. I did not move. He got quite excited and said some +more. It was undoubtable he was addressing me—nobody else was by. I +judged from his tone that he was getting cross with me. At this point my +travelling companion, his toilet unfinished, put his head out of the +window just above me. + +“Such an odd thing,” he called down to me. “I never noticed it last +night. A pair of swallows are building a nest here in the hall. You’ve +got to be careful you don’t mistake it for a hat-peg. The old lady says +they have built there regularly for the last three years.” + +Then it came to me what it was the gentleman had been saying to me: “I +say, sir, you with the bit of wood in your mouth, you have been and shut +the door and I can’t get in.” + +Now, with the key in my possession, it was so clear and understandable, I +really forgot for the moment he was only a bird. + +“I beg your pardon,” I replied, “I had no idea. Such an extraordinary +place to build a nest.” + +I opened the door for him, and, taking up his brick again, he entered, +and I followed him in. There was a deal of talk. + +“He shut the door,” I heard him say, “Chap there, sucking the bit of +wood. Thought I was never going to get in.” + +“I know,” was the answer; “it has been so dark in here, if you’ll believe +me, I’ve hardly been able to see what I’ve been doing.” + +“Fine brick, isn’t it? Where will you have it?” + +Observing me sitting there, they lowered their voices. Evidently she +wanted him to put the brick down and leave her to think. She was not +quite sure where she would have it. He, on the other hand, was sure he +had found the right place for it. He pointed it out to her and explained +his views. Other birds quarrel a good deal during nest building, but +swallows are the gentlest of little people. She let him put it where he +wanted to, and he kissed her and ran out. She cocked her eye after him, +watched till he was out of sight, then deftly and quickly slipped it out +and fixed it the other side of the door. + +“Poor dears” (I could see it in the toss of her head); “they will think +they know best; it is just as well not to argue with them.” + +Every summer I suffer much from indignation. I love to watch the +swallows building. They build beneath the eaves outside my study window. +Such cheerful little chatter-boxes they are. Long after sunset, when all +the other birds are sleeping, the swallows still are chattering softly. +It sounds as if they were telling one another some pretty story, and +often I am sure there must be humour in it, for every now and then one +hears a little twittering laugh. I delight in having them there, so +close to me. The fancy comes to me that one day, when my brain has grown +more cunning, I, too, listening in the twilight, shall hear the stories +that they tell. + +One or two phrases already I have come to understand: “Once upon a +time”—“Long, long ago”—“In a strange, far-off land.” I hear these words +so constantly, I am sure I have them right. I call it “Swallow Street,” +this row of six or seven nests. Two or three, like villas in their own +grounds, stand alone, and others are semi-detached. It makes me angry +that the sparrows will come and steal them. The sparrows will hang about +deliberately waiting for a pair of swallows to finish their nest, and +then, with a brutal laugh that makes my blood boil, drive the swallows +away and take possession of it. And the swallows are so wonderfully +patient. + +“Never mind, old girl,” says Tommy Swallow, after the first big cry is +over, to Jenny Swallow, “let’s try again.” + +And half an hour later, full of fresh plans, they are choosing another +likely site, chattering cheerfully once more. I watched the building of +a particular nest for nearly a fortnight one year; and when, after two or +three days’ absence, I returned and found a pair of sparrows comfortably +encsonced therein, I just felt mad. I saw Mrs. Sparrow looking out. +Maybe my anger was working upon my imagination, but it seemed to me that +she nodded to me: + +“Nice little house, ain’t it? What I call well built.” + +Mr. Sparrow then flew up with a gaudy feather, dyed blue, which belonged +to me. I recognised it. It had come out of the brush with which the +girl breaks the china ornaments in our drawing-room. At any other time I +should have been glad to see him flying off with the whole thing, handle +included. But now I felt the theft of that one feather as an added +injury. Mrs. Sparrow chirped with delight at sight of the gaudy +monstrosity. Having got the house cheap, they were going to spend their +small amount of energy upon internal decoration. That was their idea +clearly, a “Liberty interior.” She looked more like a Cockney sparrow +than a country one—had been born and bred in Regent Street, no doubt. + +“There is not much justice in this world,” said I to myself; “but there’s +going to be some introduced into this business—that is, if I can find a +ladder.” + +I did find a ladder, and fortunately it was long enough. Mr. and Mrs. +Sparrow were out when I arrived, possibly on the hunt for cheap photo +frames and Japanese fans. I did not want to make a mess. I removed the +house neatly into a dust-pan, and wiped the street clear of every trace +of it. I had just put back the ladder when Mrs. Sparrow returned with a +piece of pink cotton-wool in her mouth. That was her idea of a colour +scheme: apple-blossom pink and Reckitt’s blue side by side. She dropped +her wool and sat on the waterspout, and tried to understand things. + +“Number one, number two, number four; where the blazes”—sparrows are +essentially common, and the women are as bad as the men—“is number +three?” + +Mr. Sparrow came up from behind, over the roof. He was carrying a piece +of yellow-fluff, part of a lamp-shade, as far as I could judge. + +“Move yourself,” he said, “what’s the sense of sitting there in the +rain?” + +“I went out just for a moment,” replied Mrs. Sparrow; “I could not have +been gone, no, not a couple of minutes. When I came back—” + +“Oh, get indoors,” said Mr. Sparrow, “talk about it there.” + +“It’s what I’m telling you,” continued Mrs. Sparrow, “if you would only +listen. There isn’t any door, there isn’t any house—” + +“Isn’t any—” Mr. Sparrow, holding on to the rim of the spout, turned +himself topsy-turvy and surveyed the street. From where I was standing +behind the laurel bushes I could see nothing but his back. + +He stood up again, looking angry and flushed. + +“What have you done with the house? Can’t I turn my back a minute—” + +“I ain’t done nothing with it. As I keep on telling you, I had only just +gone—” + +“Oh, bother where you had gone. Where’s the darned house gone? that’s +what I want to know.” + +They looked at one another. If ever astonishment was expressed in the +attitude of a bird it was told by the tails of those two sparrows. They +whispered wickedly together. The idea occurred to them that by force or +cunning they might perhaps obtain possession of one of the other nests. +But all the other nests were occupied, and even gentle Jenny Swallow, +once in her own home with the children round about her, is not to be +trifled with. Mr. Sparrow called at number two, put his head in at the +door, and then returned to the waterspout. + +“Lady says we don’t live there,” he explained to Mrs. Sparrow. There was +silence for a while. + +“Not what I call a classy street,” commented Mrs. Sparrow. + +“If it were not for that terrible tired feeling of mine,” said Mr. +Sparrow, “blame if I wouldn’t build a house of my own.” + +“Perhaps,” said Mrs. Sparrow, “—I have heard it said that a little bit of +work, now and then, does you good.” + +“All sorts of wild ideas about in the air nowadays,” said Mr. Sparrow, +“it don’t do to listen to everybody.” + +“And it don’t do to sit still and do nothing neither,” snapped Mrs. +Sparrow. “I don’t want to have to forget I’m a lady, but—well, any man +who was a man would see things for himself.” + +“Why did I every marry?” retorted Mr. Sparrow. + +They flew away together, quarrelling. + + + + +DO WRITERS WRITE TOO MUCH? + + +ON a newspaper placard, the other day, I saw announced a new novel by a +celebrated author. I bought a copy of the paper, and turned eagerly to +the last page. I was disappointed to find that I had missed the first +six chapters. The story had commenced the previous Saturday; this was +Friday. I say I was disappointed and so I was, at first. But my +disappointment did not last long. The bright and intelligent sub-editor, +according to the custom now in vogue, had provided me with a short +synopsis of those first six chapters, so that without the trouble of +reading them I knew what they were all about. + +“The first instalment,” I learned, “introduces the reader to a brilliant +and distinguished company, assembled in the drawing-room of Lady Mary’s +maisonette in Park Street. Much smart talk is indulged in.” + +I know that “smart talk” so well. Had I not been lucky enough to miss +that first chapter I should have had to listen to it once again. +Possibly, here and there, it might have been new to me, but it would have +read, I know, so very like the old. A dear, sweet white-haired lady of +my acquaintance is never surprised at anything that happens. + +“Something very much of the same kind occurred,” she will remember, “one +winter when we were staying in Brighton. Only on that occasion the man’s +name, I think, was Robinson.” + +We do not live new stories—nor write them either. The man’s name in the +old story was Robinson, we alter it to Jones. It happened, in the old +forgotten tale, at Brighton, in the winter time; we change it to +Eastbourne, in the spring. It is new and original—to those who have not +heard “something very like it” once before. + +“Much smart talk is indulged in,” so the sub-editor has explained. There +is absolutely no need to ask for more than that. There is a Duchess who +says improper things. Once she used to shock me. But I know her now. +She is really a nice woman; she doesn’t mean them. And when the heroine +is in trouble, towards the middle of the book, she is just as amusing on +the side of virtue. Then there is a younger lady whose speciality is +proverbs. Apparently whenever she hears a proverb she writes it down and +studies it with the idea of seeing into how many different forms it can +be twisted. It looks clever; as a matter of fact, it is extremely easy. + +_Be virtuous and you will be happy_. + +She jots down all the possible variations: _Be virtuous and you will be +unhappy_. + +“Too simple that one,” she tells herself. _Be virtuous and your friends +will be happy if you are not_. + +“Better, but not wicked enough. Let us think again. _Be happy and +people will jump to the conclusion that you are virtuous_. + +“That’s good, I’ll try that one at to-morrow’s party.” + +She is a painstaking lady. One feels that, better advised, she might +have been of use in the world. + +There is likewise a disgraceful old Peer who tells naughty stories, but +who is good at heart; and one person so very rude that the wonder is who +invited him. + +Occasionally a slangy girl is included, and a clergyman, who takes the +heroine aside and talks sense to her, flavoured with epigram. All these +people chatter a mixture of Lord Chesterfield and Oliver Wendell Holmes, +of Heine, Voltaire, Madame de Stael, and the late lamented H. J. Byron. +“How they do it beats me,” as I once overheard at a music hall a stout +lady confess to her friend while witnessing the performance of a clever +troup, styling themselves “The Boneless Wonders of the Universe.” + +The synopsis added that: “Ursula Bart, a charming and unsophisticated +young American girl possessed of an elusive expression makes her first +acquaintance with London society.” + +Here you have a week’s unnecessary work on the part of the author boiled +down to its essentials. She was young. One hardly expects an elderly +heroine. The “young” might have been dispensed with, especially seeing +it is told us that she was a girl. But maybe this is carping. There are +young girls and old girls. Perhaps it is as well to have it in black and +white; she was young. She was an American young girl. There is but one +American young girl in English fiction. We know by heart the +unconventional things that she will do, the startlingly original things +that she will say, the fresh illuminating thoughts that will come to her +as, clad in a loose robe of some soft clinging stuff, she sits before the +fire, in the solitude of her own room. + +To complete her she had an “elusive expression.” The days when we used +to catalogue the heroine’s “points” are past. Formerly it was possible. +A man wrote perhaps some half-a-dozen novels during the whole course of +his career. He could have a dark girl for the first, a light girl for +the second, sketch a merry little wench for the third, and draw you +something stately for the fourth. For the remaining two he could go +abroad. Nowadays, when a man turns out a novel and six short stories +once a year, description has to be dispensed with. It is not the +writer’s fault. There is not sufficient variety in the sex. We used to +introduce her thus: + +“Imagine to yourself, dear reader, an exquisite and gracious creature of +five feet three. Her golden hair of that peculiar shade”—here would +follow directions enabling the reader to work it out for himself. He was +to pour some particular wine into some particular sort of glass, and wave +it about before some particular sort of a light. Or he was to get up at +five o’clock on a March morning and go into a wood. In this way he could +satisfy himself as to the particular shade of gold the heroine’s hair +might happen to be. If he were a careless or lazy reader he could save +himself time and trouble by taking the author’s word for it. Many of +them did. + +“Her eyes!” They were invariably deep and liquid. They had to be pretty +deep to hold all the odds and ends that were hidden in them; sunlight and +shadow, mischief, unsuspected possibilities, assorted emotions, strange +wild yearnings. Anything we didn’t know where else to put we said was +hidden in her eyes. + +“Her nose!” You could have made it for yourself out of a pen’orth of +putty after reading our description of it. + +“Her forehead!” It was always “low and broad.” I don’t know why it was +always low. Maybe because the intellectual heroine was not then popular. +For the matter of that I doubt if she be really popular now. The +brainless doll, one fears, will continue for many years to come to be +man’s ideal woman—and woman’s ideal of herself for precisely the same +period, one may be sure. + +“Her chin!” A less degree of variety was permissible in her chin. It +had to be at an angle suggestive of piquancy, and it had to contain at +least the suspicion of a dimple. + +To properly understand her complexion you were expected to provide +yourself with a collection of assorted fruits and flowers. There are +seasons in the year when it must have been difficult for the +conscientious reader to have made sure of her complexion. Possibly it +was for this purpose that wax flowers and fruit, carefully kept from the +dust under glass cases, were common objects in former times upon the +tables of the cultured. + +Nowadays we content ourselves—and our readers also, I am inclined to +think—with dashing her off in a few bold strokes. We say that whenever +she entered a room there came to one dreams of an old world garden, the +sound of far-off bells. Or that her presence brought with it the scent +of hollyhocks and thyme. As a matter of fact I don’t think hollyhocks do +smell. It is a small point; about such we do not trouble ourselves. In +the case of the homely type of girl I don’t see why we should not borrow +Mr. Pickwick’s expression, and define her by saying that in some subtle +way she always contrived to suggest an odour of chops and tomato sauce. + +If we desire to be exact we mention, as this particular author seems to +have done, that she had an “elusive expression,” or a penetrating +fragrance. Or we say that she moved, the centre of an indefinable +nuance. + +But it is not policy to bind oneself too closely to detail. A wise +friend of mine, who knows his business, describes his hero invariably in +the vaguest terms. He will not even tell you whether the man is tall or +short, clean shaven or bearded. + +“Make the fellow nice,” is his advice. “Let every woman reader picture +him to herself as her particular man. Then everything he says and does +becomes of importance to her. She is careful not to miss a word.” + +For the same reason he sees to it that his heroine has a bit of every +girl in her. Generally speaking, she is a cross between Romola and Dora +Copperfield. His novels command enormous sales. The women say he draws +a man to the life, but does not seem to know much about women. The men +like his women, but think his men stupid. + +Of another famous author no woman of my acquaintance is able to speak too +highly. They tell me his knowledge of their sex is simply marvellous, +his insight, his understanding of them almost uncanny. Thinking it might +prove useful, I made an exhaustive study of his books. I noticed that +his women were without exception brilliant charming creatures possessed +of the wit of a Lady Wortlay Montagu, combined with the wisdom of a +George Eliot. They were not all of them good women, but all of them were +clever and all of them were fascinating. I came to the conclusion that +his lady critics were correct: he did understand women. But to return to +our synopsis. + +The second chapter, it appeared, transported us to Yorkshire where: +“Basil Longleat, a typical young Englishman, lately home from college, +resides with his widowed mother and two sisters. They are a delightful +family.” + +What a world of trouble to both writer and to reader is here saved. “A +typical young Englishman!” The author probably wrote five pages, +elaborating. The five words of the sub-editor present him to me more +vividly. I see him positively glistening from the effects of soap and +water. I see his clear blue eye; his fair crisp locks, the natural +curliness of which annoys him personally, though alluring to everybody +else; his frank winning smile. He is “lately home from college.” That +tells me that he is a first-class cricketer; a first-class oar; that as a +half-back he is incomparable; that he swims like Captain Webb; is in the +first rank of tennis players; that his half-volley at ping-pong has never +been stopped. It doesn’t tell me much about his brain power. The +description of him as a “typical young Englishman” suggests more +information on this particular point. One assumes that the American girl +with the elusive expression is going to have sufficient for both. + +“They are a delightful family.” The sub-editor does not say so, but I +imagine the two sisters are likewise typical young Englishwomen. They +ride and shoot and cook and make their own dresses, have common sense and +love a joke. + +The third chapter is “taken up with the humours of a local cricket +match.” + +Thank you, Mr. Sub-editor. I feel I owe you gratitude. + +In the fourth, Ursula Bart (I was beginning to get anxious about her) +turns up again. She is staying at the useful Lady Mary’s place in +Yorkshire. She meets Basil by accident one morning while riding alone. +That is the advantage of having an American girl for your heroine. Like +the British army: it goes anywhere and does anything. + +In chapter five Basil and Ursula meet again; this time at a picnic. The +sub-editor does not wish to repeat himself, otherwise he possibly would +have summed up chapter five by saying it was “taken up with the humours +of the usual picnic.” + +In chapter six something happens: + +“Basil, returning home in the twilight, comes across Ursula Bart, in a +lonely point of the moor, talking earnestly to a rough-looking stranger. +His approach over the soft turf being unnoticed, he cannot help +overhearing Ursula’s parting words to the forbidding-looking stranger: ‘I +must see you again! To-morrow night at half-past nine! In the gateway +of the ruined abbey!’ Who is he? And why must Ursula see him again at +such an hour, in such a spot?” + +So here, at cost of reading twenty lines, I am landed, so to speak, at +the beginning of the seventh chapter. Why don’t I set to work to read +it? The sub-editor has spoiled me. + +“You read it,” I want to say to him. “Tell me to-morrow morning what it +is all about. Who was this bounder? Why should Ursula want to see him +again? Why choose a draughty place? Why half-past nine o’clock at +night, which must have been an awkward time for both of them—likely to +lead to talk? Why should I wade though this seventh chapter of three +columns and a half? It’s your work. What are you paid for?” + +My fear is lest this sort of thing shall lead to a demand on the part of +the public for condensed novels. What busy man is going to spend a week +of evenings reading a book when a nice kind sub-editor is prepared in +five minutes to tell him what it is all about! + +Then there will come a day—I feel it—when the business-like Editor will +say to himself: “What in thunder is the sense of my paying one man to +write a story of sixty thousand words and another man to read it and tell +it again in sixteen hundred!” + +We shall be expected to write our novels in chapters not exceeding twenty +words. Our short stories will be reduced to the formula: “Little boy. +Pair of skates. Broken ice, Heaven’s gates.” Formerly an author, +commissioned to supply a child’s tragedy of this genre for a Christmas +number, would have spun it out into five thousand words. Personally, I +should have commenced the previous spring—given the reader the summer and +autumn to get accustomed to the boy. He would have been a good boy; the +sort of boy that makes a bee-line for the thinnest ice. He would have +lived in a cottage. I could have spread that cottage over two pages; the +things that grew in the garden, the view from the front door. You would +have known that boy before I had done with him—felt you had known him all +your life. His quaint sayings, his childish thoughts, his great longings +would have been impressed upon you. The father might have had a dash of +humour in him, the mother’s early girlhood would have lent itself to +pretty writing. For the ice we would have had a mysterious lake in the +wood, said to be haunted. The boy would have loved o’ twilights to stand +upon its margin. He would have heard strange voices calling to him. You +would have felt the thing was coming. + +So much might have been done. When I think of that plot wasted in nine +words it makes me positively angry. + +And what is to become of us writers if this is to be the new fashion in +literature? We are paid by the length of our manuscript at rates from +half-a-crown a thousand words, and upwards. In the case of fellows like +Doyle and Kipling I am told it runs into pounds. How are we to live on +novels the serial rights of which to most of us will work out at four and +nine-pence. + +It can’t be done. It is no good telling me you can see no reason why we +should live. That is no answer. I’m talking plain business. + +And what about book-rights? Who is going to buy novels of three pages? +They will have to be printed as leaflets and sold at a penny a dozen. +Marie Corelli and Hall Caine—if all I hear about them is true—will +possibly make their ten or twelve shillings a week. But what about the +rest of us? This thing is worrying me. + + + + +SHOULD SOLDIERS BE POLITE? + + +MY desire was once to pass a peaceful and pleasant winter in Brussels, +attending to my work, improving my mind. Brussels is a bright and +cheerful town, and I think I could have succeeded had it not been for the +Belgian Army. The Belgian Army would follow me about and worry me. +Judging of it from my own experience, I should say it was a good army. +Napoleon laid it down as an axiom that your enemy never ought to be +permitted to get away from you—never ought to be allowed to feel, even +for a moment, that he had shaken you off. What tactics the Belgian Army +might adopt under other conditions I am unable to say, but against me +personally that was the plan of campaign it determined upon and carried +out with a success that was astonishing, even to myself. + +I found it utterly impossible to escape from the Belgian Army. I made a +point of choosing the quietest and most unlikely streets, I chose all +hours—early in the morning, in the afternoon, late in the evening. There +were moments of wild exaltation when I imagined I had given it the slip. +I could not see it anywhere, I could not hear it. + +“Now,” said I to myself, “now for five minutes’ peace and quiet.” + +I had been doing it injustice: it had been working round me. Approaching +the next corner, I would hear the tattoo of its drum. Before I had gone +another quarter of a mile it would be in full pursuit of me. I would +jump upon a tram, and travel for miles. Then, thinking I had shaken it +off, I would alight and proceed upon my walk. Five minutes later another +detachment would be upon my heels. I would slink home, the Belgian Army +pursuing me with its exultant tattoo. Vanquished, shamed, my insular +pride for ever vanished, I would creep up into my room and close the +door. The victorious Belgian Army would then march back to barracks. + +If only it had followed me with a band: I like a band. I can loaf +against a post, listening to a band with anyone. I should not have +minded so much had it come after me with a band. But the Belgian Army, +apparently, doesn’t run to a band. It has nothing but this drum. It has +not even a real drum—not what I call a drum. It is a little boy’s drum, +the sort of thing I used to play myself at one time, until people took it +away from me, and threatened that if they heard it once again that day +they would break it over my own head. It is cowardly going up and down, +playing a drum of this sort, when there is nobody to stop you. The man +would not dare to do it if his mother was about. He does not even play +it. He walks along tapping it with a little stick. There’s no tune, +there’s no sense in it. He does not even keep time. I used to think at +first, hearing it in the distance, that it was the work of some young +gamin who ought to be at school, or making himself useful taking the baby +out in the perambulator: and I would draw back into dark doorways, +determined, as he came by, to dart out and pull his ear for him. To my +astonishment—for the first week—I learnt it was the Belgian Army, getting +itself accustomed, one supposes, to the horrors of war. It had the +effect of making me a peace-at-any-price man. + +They tell me these armies are necessary to preserve the tranquility of +Europe. For myself, I should be willing to run the risk of an occasional +row. Cannot someone tell them they are out of date, with their bits of +feathers and their odds and ends of ironmongery—grown men that cannot be +sent out for a walk unless accompanied by a couple of nursemen, blowing a +tin whistle and tapping a drum out of a toy shop to keep them in order +and prevent their running about: one might think they were chickens. A +herd of soldiers with their pots and pans and parcels, and all their +deadly things tied on to them, prancing about in time to a tune, makes me +think always of the White Knight that Alice met in Wonderland. I take it +that for practical purposes—to fight for your country, or to fight for +somebody else’s country, which is, generally speaking, more popular—the +thing essential is that a certain proportion of the populace should be +able to shoot straight with a gun. How standing in a line and turning +out your toes is going to assist you, under modern conditions of warfare, +is one of the many things my intellect is incapable of grasping. + +In mediæval days, when men fought hand to hand, there must have been +advantage in combined and precise movement. When armies were mere iron +machines, the simple endeavour of each being to push the other off the +earth, then the striking simultaneously with a thousand arms was part of +the game. Now, when we shoot from behind cover with smokeless powder, +brain not brute force—individual sense not combined solidity is surely +the result to be aimed at. Cannot somebody, as I have suggested, explain +to the military man that the proper place for the drill sergeant nowadays +is under a glass case in some museum of antiquities? + +I lived once near the Hyde Park barracks, and saw much of the drill +sergeant’s method. Generally speaking, he is a stout man with the walk +of an egotistical pigeon. His voice is one of the most extraordinary +things in nature: if you can distinguish it from the bark of a dog, you +are clever. They tell me that the privates, after a little practice, +can—which gives one a higher opinion of their intelligence than otherwise +one might form. But myself I doubt even this statement. I was the owner +of a fine retriever dog about the time of which I am speaking, and +sometimes he and I would amuse ourselves by watching Mr. Sergeant +exercising his squad. One morning he had been shouting out the usual +“Whough, whough, whough!” for about ten minutes, and all had hitherto +gone well. Suddenly, and evidently to his intense astonishment, the +squad turned their backs upon him and commenced to walk towards the +Serpentine. + +“Halt!” yelled the sergeant, the instant his amazed indignation permitted +him to speak, which fortunately happened in time to save the detachment +from a watery grave. + +The squad halted. + +“Who the thunder, and the blazes, and other things told you to do that?” + +The squad looked bewildered, but said nothing, and were brought back to +the place where they were before. A minute later precisely the same +thing occurred again. I really thought the sergeant would burst. I was +preparing to hasten to the barracks for medical aid. But the paroxysm +passed. Calling upon the combined forces of heaven and hell to sustain +him in his trouble, he requested his squad, as man to man, to inform him +of the reason why to all appearance they were dispensing with his +services and drilling themselves. + +At this moment “Columbus” barked again, and the explanation came to him. + +“Please go away, sir,” he requested me. “How can I exercise my men with +that dog of yours interfering every five minutes?” + +It was not only on that occasion. It happened at other times. The dog +seemed to understand and take a pleasure in it. Sometimes meeting a +soldier, walking with his sweetheart, Columbus, from behind my legs, +would bark suddenly. Immediately the man would let go the girl and +proceed, involuntarily, to perform military tricks. + +The War Office authorities accused me of having trained the dog. I had +not trained him: that was his natural voice. I suggested to the War +Office authorities that instead of quarrelling with my dog for talking +his own language, they should train their sergeants to use English. + +They would not see it. Unpleasantness was in the air, and, living where +I did at the time, I thought it best to part with Columbus. I could see +what the War Office was driving at, and I did not desire that +responsibility for the inefficiency of the British Army should be laid at +my door. + +Some twenty years ago we, in London, were passing through a riotous +period, and a call was made to law-abiding citizens to enrol themselves +as special constables. I was young, and the hope of trouble appealed to +me more than it does now. In company with some five or six hundred other +more or less respectable citizens, I found myself one Sunday morning in +the drill yard of the Albany Barracks. It was the opinion of the +authorities that we could guard our homes and protect our wives and +children better if first of all we learned to roll our “eyes right” or +left at the given word of command, and to walk with our thumbs stuck out. +Accordingly a drill sergeant was appointed to instruct us on these +points. He came out of the canteen, wiping his mouth and flicking his +leg, according to rule, with the regulation cane. But, as he approached +us, his expression changed. We were stout, pompous-looking gentlemen, +the majority of us, in frock coats and silk hats. The sergeant was a man +with a sense of the fitness of things. The idea of shouting and swearing +at us fell from him: and that gone there seemed to be no happy medium +left to him. The stiffness departed from his back. He met us with a +defferential attitude, and spoke to us in the language of social +intercourse. + +“Good morning, gentlemen,” said the sergeant. + +“Good morning,” we replied: and there was a pause. + +The sergeant fidgetted upon his feet. We waited. + +“Well, now, gentlemen,” said the sergeant, with a pleasant smile, “what +do you say to falling in?” + +We agreed to fall in. He showed us how to do it. He cast a critical eye +along the back of our rear line. + +“A little further forward, number three, if you don’t mind, sir,” he +suggested. + +Number three, who was an important-looking gentleman, stepped forward. + +The sergeant cast his critical eye along the front of the first line. + +“A little further back, if you don’t mind, sir,” he suggested, addressing +the third gentleman from the end. + +“Can’t,” explained the third gentleman, “much as I can do to keep where I +am.” + +The sergeant cast his critical eye between the lines. + +“Ah,” said the sergeant, “a little full-chested, some of us. We will +make the distance another foot, if you please, gentlemen.” + +In pleasant manner, like to this, the drill proceeded. + +“Now then, gentlemen, shall we try a little walk? Quick march! Thank +you, gentlemen. Sorry to trouble you, but it may be necessary to +run—forward I mean, of course.. So if you really do not mind, we will +now do the double quick. Halt! And if next time you can keep a little +more in line—it has a more imposing appearance, if you understand me. +The breathing comes with practice.” + +If the thing must be done at all, why should it not be done in this way? +Why should not the sergeant address the new recruits politely: + +“Now then, you young chaps, are you all ready? Don’t hurry yourselves: +no need to make hard work of what should be a pleasure to all of us. +That’s right, that’s very good indeed—considering you are only novices. +But there is still something to be desired in your attitude, Private +Bully-boy. You will excuse my being personal, but are you knock-kneed +naturally? Or could you, with an effort, do you think, contrive to give +yourself less the appearance of a marionette whose strings have become +loose? Thank you, that is better. These little things appear trivial, I +know, but, after all, we may as well try and look our best— + +“Don’t you like your boots, Private Montmorency? Oh, I beg your pardon. +I thought from the way you were bending down and looking at them that +perhaps their appearance was dissatisfying to you. My mistake. + +“Are you suffering from indigestion, my poor fellow? Shall I get you a +little brandy? It isn’t indigestion. Then what’s the matter with it? +Why are you trying to hide it? It’s nothing to be ashamed of. We’ve all +got one. Let it come forward man. Let’s see it.” + +Having succeeded, with a few such kindly words, in getting his line into +order, he would proceed to recommend healthy exercise. + +“Shoulder arms! Good, gentlemen, very good for a beginning. Yet still, +if I may be critical, not perfect. There is more in this thing than you +might imagine, gentlemen. May I point out to Private Henry Thompson that +a musket carried across the shoulder at right angles is apt to +inconvenience the gentleman behind. Even from the point of view of his +own comfort, I feel sure that Private Thompson would do better to follow +the usual custom in this matter. + +“I would also suggest to Private St. Leonard that we are not here to +practice the art of balancing a heavy musket on the outstretched palm of +the hand. Private St. Leonard’s performance with the musket is decidedly +clever. But it is not war. + +“Believe me, gentlemen, this thing has been carefully worked out, and no +improvement is likely to result from individual effort. Let our idea be +uniformity. It is monotonous, but it is safe. Now, then, gentlemen, +once again.” + +The drill yard would be converted into a source of innocent delight to +thousands. “Officer and gentleman” would become a phrase of meaning. I +present the idea, for what it may be worth, with my compliments, to Pall +Mall. + +The fault of the military man is that he studies too much, reads too much +history, is over reflective. If, instead, he would look about him more +he would notice that things are changing. Someone has told the British +military man that Waterloo was won upon the playing fields of Eton. So +he goes to Eton and plays. One of these days he will be called upon to +fight another Waterloo: and afterwards—when it is too late—they will +explain to him that it was won not upon the play field but in the class +room. + +From the mound on the old Waterloo plain one can form a notion of what +battles, under former conditions, must have been. The other battlefields +of Europe are rapidly disappearing: useful Dutch cabbages, as Carlyle +would have pointed out with justifiable satisfaction, hiding the theatre +of man’s childish folly. You find, generally speaking, cobblers happily +employed in cobbling shoes, women gossipping cheerfully over the washtub +on the spot where a hundred years ago, according to the guide-book, a +thousand men dressed in blue and a thousand men dressed in red rushed +together like quarrelsome fox-terriers, and worried each other to death. + +But the field of Waterloo is little changed. The guide, whose +grandfather was present at the battle—quite an extraordinary number of +grandfathers must have fought at Waterloo: there must have been whole +regiments composed of grandfathers—can point out to you the ground across +which every charge was delivered, can show you every ridge, still +existing, behind which the infantry crouched. The whole business was +began and finished within a space little larger than a square mile. One +can understand the advantage then to be derived from the perfect moving +of the military machine; the uses of the echelon, the purposes of the +linked battalion, the manipulation of centre, left wing and right wing. +Then it may have been worth while—if war be ever worth the while—which +grown men of sense are beginning to doubt—to waste two years of a +soldier’s training, teaching him the goose-step. In the twentieth +century, teaching soldiers the evolutions of the Thirty Years’ War is +about as sensible as it would be loading our iron-clads with canvas. + +I followed once a company of Volunteers across Blackfriars Bridge on +their way from Southwark to the Temple. At the bottom of Ludgate Hill +the commanding officer, a young but conscientious gentleman, ordered +“Left wheel!” At once the vanguard turned down a narrow alley—I forget +its name—which would have led the troop into the purlieus of Whitefriars, +where, in all probability, they would have been lost for ever. The whole +company had to be halted, right-about-faced, and retired a hundred yards. +Then the order “Quick march!” was given. The vanguard shot across +Ludgate Circus, and were making for the Meat Market. + +At this point that young commanding officer gave up being a military man +and talked sense. + +“Not that way,” he shouted: “up Fleet Street and through Middle Temple +Lane.” + +Then without further trouble the army of the future went upon its way. + + + + +OUGHT STORIES TO BE TRUE? + + +THERE was once upon a time a charming young lady, possessed of much +taste, who was asked by her anxious parent, the years passing and family +expenditure not decreasing, which of the numerous and eligible young men +then paying court to her she liked the best. She replied, that was her +difficulty; she could not make up her mind which she liked the best. +They were all so nice. She could not possibly select one to the +exclusion of all the others. What she would have liked would have been +to marry the lot; but that, she presumed, was impracticable. + +I feel I resemble that young lady, not so much in charm and beauty as in +indecision of mind, when the question is that of my favourite author or +my favourite book. It is as if one were asked one’s favourite food. +There are times when one fancies an egg with one’s tea. On other +occasions one dreams of a kipper. To-day one clamours for lobsters. +To-morrow one feels one never wishes to see a lobster again. One +determines to settle down, for a time, to a diet of bread and milk and +rice pudding. Asked suddenly to say whether I preferred ices to soup, or +beef-steak to caviare, I should be completely nonplussed. + +There may be readers who care for only one literary diet. I am a person +of gross appetites, requiring many authors to satisfy me. There are +moods when the savage strength of the Bronte sisters is companionable to +me. One rejoices in the unrelieved gloom of “Wuthering Heights,” as in +the lowering skies of a stormy autumn. Perhaps part of the marvel of the +book comes from the knowledge that the authoress was a slight, delicate +young girl. One wonders what her future work would have been, had she +lived to gain a wider experience of life; or was it well for her fame +that nature took the pen so soon from her hand? Her suppressed vehemence +may have been better suited to those tangled Yorkshire byways than to the +more open, cultivated fields of life. + +There is not much similarity between the two books, yet when recalling +Emily Bronte my thoughts always run on to Olive Schreiner. Here, again, +was a young girl with the voice of a strong man. Olive Schreiner, more +fortunate, has lived; but I doubt if she will ever write a book that will +remind us of her first. “The Story of an African Farm” is not a work to +be repeated. We have advanced in literature of late. I can well +remember the storm of indignation with which the “African Farm” was +received by Mrs. Grundy and her then numerous, but now happily +diminishing, school. It was a book that was to be kept from the hands of +every young man and woman. But the hands of the young men and women +stretched out and grasped it, to their help. It is a curious idea, this +of Mrs. Grundy’s, that the young man and woman must never think—that all +literature that does anything more than echo the conventions must be +hidden away. + +Then there are times when I love to gallop through history on Sir +Walter’s broomstick. At other hours it is pleasant to sit in converse +with wise George Eliot. From her garden terrace I look down on Loamshire +and its commonplace people; while in her quiet, deep voice she tells me +of the hidden hearts that beat and throb beneath these velveteen jackets +and lace falls. + +Who can help loving Thackeray, wittiest, gentlest of men, in spite of the +faint suspicion of snobbishness that clings to him? There is something +pathetic in the good man’s horror of this snobbishness, to which he +himself was a victim. May it not have been an affectation, born +unconsciously of self-consciousness? His heroes and heroines must needs +be all fine folk, fit company for lady and gentlemen readers. To him the +livery was too often the man. Under his stuffed calves even _Jeames de +la Pluche_ himself stood upon the legs of a man, but Thackeray could +never see deeper than the silk stockings. Thackeray lived and died in +Clubland. One feels that the world was bounded for him by Temple Bar on +the east and Park Lane on the west; but what there was good in Clubland +he showed us, and for the sake of the great gentlemen and sweet ladies +that his kindly eyes found in that narrow region, not too overpeopled +with great gentlemen and sweet women, let us honour him. + +“Tom Jones,” “Peregrine Pickle,” and “Tristram Shandy” are books a man is +the better for reading, if he read them wisely. They teach him that +literature, to be a living force, must deal with all sides of life, and +that little help comes to us from that silly pretence of ours that we are +perfect in all things, leading perfect lives, that only the villain of +the story ever deviates from the path of rectitude. + +This is a point that needs to be considered by both the makers and the +buyers of stories. If literature is to be regarded solely as the +amusement of an idle hour, then the less relationship it has to life the +better. Looking into a truthful mirror of nature we are compelled to +think; and when thought comes in at the window self-satisfaction goes out +by the door. Should a novel or play call us to ponder upon the problems +of existence, or lure us from the dusty high road of the world, for a +while, into the pleasant meadows of dreamland? If only the latter, then +let our heroes and our heroines be not what men and women are, but what +they should be. Let Angelina be always spotless and Edwin always true. +Let virtue ever triumph over villainy in the last chapter; and let us +assume that the marriage service answers all the questions of the Sphinx. + +Very pleasant are these fairy tales where the prince is always brave and +handsome; where the princess is always the best and most beautiful +princess that ever lived; where one knows the wicked people at a glance +by their ugliness and ill-temper, mistakes being thus rendered +impossible; where the good fairies are, by nature, more powerful than the +bad; where gloomy paths lead ever to fair palaces; where the dragon is +ever vanquished; and where well-behaved husbands and wives can rely upon +living happily ever afterwards. “The world is too much with us, late and +soon.” It is wise to slip away from it at times to fairyland. But, +alas, we cannot live in fairyland, and knowledge of its geography is of +little help to us on our return to the rugged country of reality. + +Are not both branches of literature needful? By all means let us dream, +on midsummer nights, of fond lovers led through devious paths to +happiness by Puck; of virtuous dukes—one finds such in fairyland; of fate +subdued by faith and gentleness. But may we not also, in our more +serious humours, find satisfaction in thinking with Hamlet or Coriolanus? +May not both Dickens and Zola have their booths in Vanity Fair? If +literature is to be a help to us, as well as a pastime, it must deal with +the ugly as well as with the beautiful; it must show us ourselves, not as +we wish to appear, but as we know ourselves to be. Man has been +described as a animal with aspirations reaching up to Heaven and +instincts rooted—elsewhere. Is literature to flatter him, or reveal him +to himself? + +Of living writers it is not safe, I suppose, to speak except, perhaps, of +those who have been with us so long that we have come to forget they are +not of the past. Has justice ever been done to Ouida’s undoubted genius +by our shallow school of criticism, always very clever in discovering +faults as obvious as pimples on a fine face? Her guardsmen “toy” with +their food. Her horses win the Derby three years running. Her wicked +women throw guinea peaches from the windows of the Star and Garter into +the Thames at Richmond. The distance being about three hundred and fifty +yards, it is a good throw. Well, well, books are not made worth reading +by the absence of absurdities. Ouida possesses strength, tenderness, +truth, passion; and these be qualities in a writer capable of carrying +many more faults than Ouida is burdened with. But that is the method of +our little criticism. It views an artist as Gulliver saw the Brobdingnag +ladies. It is too small to see them in their entirety: a mole or a wart +absorbs all its vision. + +Why was not George Gissing more widely read? If faithfulness to life +were the key to literary success, Gissing’s sales would have been counted +by the million instead of by the hundred. + +Have Mark Twain’s literary qualities, apart altogether from his humour, +been recognised in literary circles as they ought to have been? “Huck +Finn” would be a great work were there not a laugh in it from cover to +cover. Among the Indians and some other savage tribes the fact that a +member of the community has lost one of his senses makes greatly to his +advantage; he is then regarded as a superior person. So among a school +of Anglo-Saxon readers, it is necessary to a man, if he would gain +literary credit, that he should lack the sense of humour. One or two +curious modern examples occur to me of literary success secured chiefly +by this failing. + +All these authors are my favourites; but such catholic taste is held +nowadays to be no taste. One is told that if one loves Shakespeare, one +must of necessity hate Ibsen; that one cannot appreciate Wagner and +tolerate Beethoven; that if we admit any merit in Dore, we are incapable +of understanding Whistler. How can I say which is my favourite novel? I +can only ask myself which lives clearest in my memory, which is the book +I run to more often than to another in that pleasant half hour before the +dinner-bell, when, with all apologies to good Mr. Smiles, it is useless +to think of work. + +I find, on examination, that my “David Copperfield” is more dilapidated +than any other novel upon my shelves. As I turn its dog-eared pages, +reading the familiar headlines “Mr. Micawber in difficulties,” “Mr. +Micawber in prison,” “I fall in love with Dora,” “Mr. Barkis goes out +with the tide,” “My child wife,” “Traddles in a nest of roses”—pages of +my own life recur to me; so many of my sorrows, so many of my joys are +woven in my mind with this chapter or the other. That day—how well I +remember it when I read of “David’s” wooing, but Dora’s death I was +careful to skip. Poor, pretty little Mrs. Copperfield at the gate, +holding up her baby in her arms, is always associated in my memory with a +child’s cry, long listened for. I found the book, face downwards on a +chair, weeks afterwards, not moved from where I had hastily laid it. + +Old friends, all of you, how many times have I not slipped away from my +worries into your pleasant company! Peggotty, you dear soul, the sight +of your kind eyes is so good to me. Our mutual friend, Mr. Charles +Dickens, is prone, we know, just ever so slightly to gush. Good fellow +that he is, he can see no flaw in those he loves, but you, dear lady, if +you will permit me to call you by a name much abused, he has drawn in +true colours. I know you well, with your big heart, your quick temper, +your homely, human ways of thought. You yourself will never guess your +worth—how much the world is better for such as you! You think of +yourself as of a commonplace person, useful only for the making of +pastry, the darning of stockings, and if a man—not a young man, with only +dim half-opened eyes, but a man whom life had made keen to see the beauty +that lies hidden beneath plain faces—were to kneel and kiss your red, +coarse hand, you would be much astonished. But he would be a wise man, +Peggotty, knowing what things a man should take carelessly, and for what +things he should thank God, who has fashioned fairness in many forms. + +Mr. Wilkins Micawber, and you, most excellent of faithful wives, Mrs. +Emma Micawber, to you I also raise my hat. How often has the example of +your philosophy saved me, when I, likewise, have suffered under the +temporary pressure of pecuniary liabilities; when the sun of my +prosperity, too, has sunk beneath the dark horizon of the world—in short, +when I, also, have found myself in a tight corner. I have asked myself +what would the Micawbers have done in my place. And I have answered +myself. They would have sat down to a dish of lamb’s fry, cooked and +breaded by the deft hands of Emma, followed by a brew of punch, concocted +by the beaming Wilkins, and have forgotten all their troubles, for the +time being. Whereupon, seeing first that sufficient small change was in +my pocket, I have entered the nearest restaurant, and have treated myself +to a repast of such sumptuousness as the aforesaid small change would +command, emerging from that restaurant stronger and more fit for battle. +And lo! the sun of my prosperity has peeped at me from over the clouds +with a sly wink, as if to say “Cheer up; I am only round the corner.” + +Cheery, elastic Mr. and Mrs. Micawber, how would half the world face +their fate but by the help of a kindly, shallow nature such as yours? I +love to think that your sorrows can be drowned in nothing more harmful +than a bowl of punch. Here’s to you, Emma, and to you, Wilkins, and to +the twins! + +May you and such childlike folk trip lightly over the stones upon your +path! May something ever turn up for you, my dears! May the rain of +life ever fall as April showers upon your simple bald head, Micawber! + +And you, sweet Dora, let me confess I love you, though sensible friends +deem you foolish. Ah, silly Dora, fashioned by wise Mother Nature who +knows that weakness and helplessness are as a talisman calling forth +strength and tenderness in man, trouble yourself not unduly about the +oysters and the underdone mutton, little woman. Good plain cooks at +twenty pounds a year will see to these things for us. Your work is to +teach us gentleness and kindness. Lay your foolish curls just here, +child. It is from such as you we learn wisdom. Foolish wise folk sneer +at you. Foolish wise folk would pull up the laughing lilies, the +needless roses from the garden, would plant in their places only useful, +wholesome cabbage. But the gardener, knowing better, plants the silly, +short-lived flowers, foolish wise folk asking for what purpose. + +Gallant Traddles, of the strong heart and the unruly hair; Sophy, dearest +of girls; Betsy Trotwood, with your gentlemanly manners and your woman’s +heart, you have come to me in shabby rooms, making the dismal place seem +bright. In dark hours your kindly faces have looked out at me from the +shadows, your kindly voices have cheered me. + +Little Em’ly and Agnes, it may be my bad taste, but I cannot share my +friend Dickens’ enthusiasm for them. Dickens’ good women are all too +good for human nature’s daily food. Esther Summerson, Florence Dombey, +Little Nell—you have no faults to love you by. + +Scott’s women were likewise mere illuminated texts. Scott only drew one +live heroine—Catherine Seton. His other women were merely the prizes the +hero had to win in the end, like the sucking pig or the leg of mutton for +which the yokel climbs the greasy pole. That Dickens could draw a woman +to some likeness he proved by Bella Wilfer, and Estella in “Great +Expectations.” But real women have never been popular in fiction. Men +readers prefer the false, and women readers object to the truth. + +From an artistic point of view, “David Copperfield” is undoubtedly +Dickens’ best work. Its humour is less boisterous; its pathos less +highly coloured. + +One of Leech’s pictures represents a cab-man calmly sleeping in the +gutter. + +“Oh, poor dear, he’s ill,” says a tender-hearted lady in the crowd. +“Ill!” retorts a male bystander indignantly, “Ill! ’E’s ’ad too much of +what I ain’t ’ad enough of.” + +Dickens suffered from too little of what some of us have too much +of—criticism. His work met with too little resistance to call forth his +powers. Too often his pathos sinks to bathos, and this not from want of +skill, but from want of care. It is difficult to believe that the +popular writer who allowed his sentimentality—or rather the public’s +sentimentality—to run away with him in such scenes as the death of Paul +Dombey and Little Nell was the artist who painted the death of Sidney +Carton and of Barkis, the willing. The death of Barkis, next to the +passing of Colonel Newcome, is, to my thinking, one of the most perfect +pieces of pathos in English literature. No very deep emotion is +concerned. He is a commonplace old man, clinging foolishly to a +commonplace box. His simple wife and the old boatmen stand by, waiting +calmly for the end. There is no straining after effect. One feels death +enter, dignifying all things; and touched by that hand, foolish old +Barkis grows great. + +In Uriah Heap and Mrs. Gummidge, Dickens draws types rather than +characters. Pecksniff, Podsnap, Dolly Varden, Mr. Bumble, Mrs. Gamp, +Mark Tapley, Turveydrop, Mrs. Jellyby—these are not characters; they are +human characteristics personified. + +We have to go back to Shakespeare to find a writer who, through fiction, +has so enriched the thought of the people. Admit all Dickens’ faults +twice over, we still have one of the greatest writers of modern times. +Such people as these creations of Dickens never lived, says your little +critic. Nor was Prometheus, type of the spirit of man, nor was Niobe, +mother of all mothers, a truthful picture of the citizen one was likely +to meet often during a morning’s stroll through Athens. Nor grew there +ever a wood like to the Forest of Arden, though every Rosalind and +Orlando knows the path to glades having much resemblance thereto. + +Steerforth, upon whom Dickens evidently prided himself, I must confess, +never laid hold of me. He is a melodramatic young man. The worst I +could have wished him would have been that he should marry Rose Dartle +and live with his mother. It would have served him right for being so +attractive. Old Peggotty and Ham are, of course, impossible. One must +accept them also as types. These Brothers Cheeryble, these Kits, Joe +Gargeries, Boffins, Garlands, John Peerybingles, we will accept as types +of the goodness that is in men—though in real life the amount of virtue +that Dickens often wastes upon a single individual would by more +economically minded nature, be made to serve for fifty. + +To sum up, “David Copperfield” is a plain tale, simply told; and such are +all books that live. Eccentricities of style, artistic trickery, may +please the critic of a day, but literature is a story that interests us, +boys and girls, men and women. It is a sad book; and that, again, gives +it an added charm in these sad later days. Humanity is nearing its old +age, and we have come to love sadness, as the friend who has been longest +with us. In the young days of our vigour we were merry. With Ulysses’ +boatmen, we took alike the sunshine and the thunder with frolic welcome. +The red blood flowed in our veins, and we laughed, and our tales were of +strength and hope. Now we sit like old men, watching faces in the fire; +and the stories that we love are sad stories—like the stories we +ourselves have lived. + + + + +CREATURES THAT ONE DAY SHALL BE MEN. + + +I OUGHT to like Russia better than I do, if only for the sake of the many +good friends I am proud to possess amongst the Russians. A large square +photograph I keep always on my mantel-piece; it helps me to maintain my +head at that degree of distention necessary for the performance of all +literary work. It presents in the centre a neatly-written address in +excellent English that I frankly confess I am never tired of reading, +around which are ranged some hundreds of names I am quite unable to read, +but which, in spite of their strange lettering, I know to be the names of +good Russian men and women to whom, a year or two ago, occurred the +kindly idea of sending me as a Christmas card this message of +encouragement. The individual Russian is one of the most charming +creatures living. If he like you he does not hesitate to let you know +it; not only by every action possible, but, by what perhaps is just as +useful in this grey old world, by generous, impulsive speech. + +We Anglo-Saxons are apt to pride ourselves upon being undemonstrative. +Max Adeler tells the tale of a boy who was sent out by his father to +fetch wood. The boy took the opportunity of disappearing and did not +show his face again beneath the paternal roof for over twenty years. +Then one evening, a smiling, well-dressed stranger entered to the old +couple, and announced himself as their long-lost child, returned at last. + +“Well, you haven’t hurried yourself,” grumbled the old man, “and blarm me +if now you haven’t forgotten the wood.” + +I was lunching with an Englishman in a London restaurant one day. A man +entered and took his seat at a table near by. Glancing round, and +meeting my friend’s eyes, he smiled and nodded. + +“Excuse me a minute,” said my friend, “I must just speak to my +brother—haven’t seen him for over five years.” + +He finished his soup and leisurely wiped his moustache before strolling +across and shaking hands. They talked for a while. Then my friend +returned to me. + +“Never thought to see him again,” observed my friend, “he was one of the +garrison of that place in Africa—what’s the name of it?—that the Mahdi +attacked. Only three of them escaped. Always was a lucky beggar, Jim.” + +“But wouldn’t you like to talk to him some more?” I suggested; “I can see +you any time about this little business of ours.” + +“Oh, that’s all right,” he answered, “we have just fixed it up—shall be +seeing him again to-morrow.” + +I thought of this scene one evening while dining with some Russian +friends in a St. Petersburg Hotel. One of the party had not seen his +second cousin, a mining engineer, for nearly eighteen months. They sat +opposite to one another, and a dozen times at least during the course of +the dinner one of them would jump up from his chair, and run round to +embrace the other. They would throw their arms about one another, +kissing one another on both cheeks, and then sit down again, with moist +eyes. Their behaviour among their fellow countrymen excited no +astonishment whatever. + +But the Russians’s anger is as quick and vehement as his love. On +another occasion I was supping with friends in one of the chief +restaurants on the Nevsky. Two gentlemen at an adjoining table, who up +till the previous moment had been engaged in amicable conversation, +suddenly sprang to their feet, and “went for” one another. One man +secured the water-bottle, which he promptly broke over the other’s head. +His opponent chose for his weapon a heavy mahogany chair, and leaping +back for the purpose of securing a good swing, lurched against my +hostess. + +“Do please be careful,” said the lady. + +“A thousand pardons, madame,” returned the stranger, from whom blood and +water were streaming in equal copiousness; and taking the utmost care to +avoid interfering with our comfort, he succeeded adroitly in flooring his +antagonist by a well-directed blow. + +A policeman appeared upon the scene. He did not attempt to interfere, +but running out into the street communicated the glad tidings to another +policeman. + +“This is going to cost them a pretty penny,” observed my host, who was +calmly continuing his supper; “why couldn’t they wait?” + +It did cost them a pretty penny. Some half a dozen policemen were round +about before as many minutes had elapsed, and each one claimed his bribe. +Then they wished both combatants good-night, and trooped out evidently in +great good humour and the two gentlemen, with wet napkins round their +heads, sat down again, and laughter and amicable conversation flowed +freely as before. + +They strike the stranger as a childlike people, but you are possessed +with a haunting sense of ugly traits beneath. The workers—slaves it +would be almost more correct to call them—allow themselves to be +exploited with the uncomplaining patience of intelligent animals. Yet +every educated Russian you talk to on the subject knows that revolution +is coming. + +But he talks to you about it with the door shut, for no man in Russia can +be sure that his own servants are not police spies. I was discussing +politics with a Russian official one evening in his study when his old +housekeeper entered the room—a soft-eyed grey-haired woman who had been +in his service over eight years, and whose position in the household was +almost that of a friend. He stopped abruptly and changed the +conversation. So soon as the door was closed behind her again, he +explained himself. + +“It is better to chat upon such matters when one is quite alone,” he +laughed. + +“But surely you can trust her,” I said, “She appears to be devoted to you +all.” + +“It is safer to trust no one,” he answered. And then he continued from +the point where we had been interrupted. + +“It is gathering,” he said; “there are times when I almost smell blood in +the air. I am an old man and may escape it, but my children will have to +suffer—suffer as children must for the sins of their fathers. We have +made brute beasts of the people, and as brute beasts they will come upon +us, cruel, and undiscriminating; right and wrong indifferently going down +before them. But it has to be. It is needed.” + +It is a mistake to speak of the Russian classes opposing to all progress +a dead wall of selfishness. The history of Russia will be the history of +the French Revolution over again, but with this difference: that the +educated classes, the thinkers, who are pushing forward the dumb masses +are doing so with their eyes open. There will be no Maribeau, no Danton +to be appalled at a people’s ingratitude. The men who are to-day working +for revolution in Russia number among their ranks statesmen, soldiers, +delicately-nurtured women, rich landowners, prosperous tradesmen, +students familiar with the lessons of history. They have no +misconceptions concerning the blind Monster into which they are breathing +life. He will crush them, they know it; but with them he will crush the +injustice and stupidity they have grown to hate more than they love +themselves. + +The Russian peasant, when he rises, will prove more terrible, more +pitiless than were the men of 1790. He is less intelligent, more brutal. +They sing a wild, sad song, these Russian cattle, the while they work. +They sing it in chorus on the quays while hauling the cargo, they sing it +in the factory, they chant on the weary, endless steppes, reaping the +corn they may not eat. It is of the good time their masters are having, +of the feastings and the merrymakings, of the laughter of the children, +of the kisses of the lovers. + +But the last line of every verse is the same. When you ask a Russian to +translate it for you he shrugs his shoulders. + +“Oh, it means,” he says, “that their time will also come—some day.” + +It is a pathetic, haunting refrain. They sing it in the drawing-rooms of +Moscow and St. Petersburg, and somehow the light talk and laughter die +away, and a hush, like a chill breath, enters by the closed door and +passes through. It is a curious song, like the wailing of a tired wind, +and one day it will sweep over the land heralding terror. + +A Scotsman I met in Russia told me that when he first came out to act as +manager of a large factory in St. Petersburg, belonging to his Scottish +employers, he unwittingly made a mistake the first week when paying his +workpeople. By a miscalculation of the Russian money he paid the men, +each one, nearly a rouble short. He discovered his error before the +following Saturday, and then put the matter right. The men accepted his +explanation with perfect composure and without any comment whatever. The +thing astonished him. + +“But you must have known I was paying you short,” he said to one of them. +“Why didn’t you tell me of it?” + +“Oh,” answered the man, “we thought you were putting it in your own +pocket and then if we had complained it would have meant dismissal for +us. No one would have taken our word against yours.” + +Corruption appears to be so general throughout the whole of Russia that +all classes have come to accept it as part of the established order of +things. A friend gave me a little dog to bring away with me. It was a +valuable animal, and I wished to keep it with me. It is strictly +forbidden to take dogs into railway carriages. The list of the pains and +penalties for doing so frightened me considerably. + +“Oh, that will be all right,” my friend assured me; “have a few roubles +loose in your pocket.” + +I tipped the station master and I tipped the guard, and started pleased +with myself. But I had not anticipated what was in store for me. The +news that an Englishman with a dog in a basket and roubles in his pocket +was coming must have been telegraphed all down the line. At almost every +stopping-place some enormous official, wearing generally a sword and a +helmet, boarded the train. At first these fellows terrified me. I took +them for field-marshals at least. + +Visions of Siberia crossed my mind. Anxious and trembling, I gave the +first one a gold piece. He shook me warmly by the hand—I thought he was +going to kiss me. If I had offered him my cheek I am sure he would have +done so. With the next one I felt less apprehensive. For a couple of +roubles he blessed me, so I gathered; and, commending me to the care of +the Almighty, departed. Before I had reached the German frontier, I was +giving away the equivalent of English sixpences to men with the dress and +carriage of major-generals; and to see their faces brighten up and to +receive their heartfelt benediction was well worth the money. + +But to the man without roubles in his pocket, Russian officialdom is not +so gracious. By the expenditure of a few more coins I got my dog through +the Customs without trouble, and had leisure to look about me. A +miserable object was being badgered by half a dozen men in uniform, and +he—his lean face puckered up into a snarl—was returning them snappish +answers; the whole scene suggested some half-starved mongrel being +worried by school-boys. A slight informality had been discovered in his +passport, so a fellow traveller with whom I had made friends informed me. +He had no roubles in his pocket, and in consequence they were sending him +back to St. Petersburg—some eighteen hours’ journey—in a wagon that in +England would not be employed for the transport of oxen. + +It seemed a good joke to Russian officialdom; they would drop in every +now and then, look at him as he sat crouched in a corner of the +waiting-room, and pass out again, laughing. The snarl had died from his +face; a dull, listless indifference had taken its place—the look one sees +on the face of a beaten dog, after the beating is over, when it is lying +very still, its great eyes staring into nothingness, and one wonders +whether it is thinking. + +The Russian worker reads no newspaper, has no club, yet all things seem +to be known to him. There is a prison on the banks of the Neva, in St. +Petersburg. They say such things are done with now, but up till very +recently there existed a small cell therein, below the level of the ice, +and prisoners placed there would be found missing a day or two +afterwards, nothing ever again known of them, except, perhaps, to the +fishes of the Baltic. They talk of such like things among themselves: +the sleigh-drivers round their charcoal fire, the field-workers going and +coming in the grey dawn, the factory workers, their whispers deadened by +the rattle of the looms. + +I was searching for a house in Brussels some winters ago, and there was +one I was sent to in a small street leading out of the Avenue Louise. It +was poorly furnished, but rich in pictures, large and small. They +covered the walls of every room. + +“These pictures,” explained to me the landlady, an old, haggard-looking +woman, “will not be left, I am taking them with me to London. They are +all the work of my husband. He is arranging an exhibition.” + +The friend who had sent me had told me the woman was a widow, who had +been living in Brussels eking out a precarious existence as a +lodging-house keeper for the last ten years. + +“You have married again?” I questioned her. + +The woman smiled. + +“Not again. I was married eighteen years ago in Russia. My husband was +transported to Siberia a few days after we were married, and I have never +seen him since.” + +“I should have followed him,” she added, “only every year we thought he +was going to be set free.” + +“He is really free now?” I asked. + +“Yes,” she answered. “They set him free last week. He will join me in +London. We shall be able to finish our honeymoon.” + +She smiled, revealing to me that once she had been a girl. + +I read in the English papers of the exhibition in London. It was said +the artist showed much promise. So possibly a career may at last be +opening out for him. + +Nature has made life hard to Russian rich and poor alike. To the banks +of the Neva, with its ague and influenza-bestowing fogs and mists, one +imagines that the Devil himself must have guided Peter the Great. + +“Show me in all my dominions the most hopelessly unattractive site on +which to build a city,” Peter must have prayed; and the Devil having +discovered the site on which St. Petersburg now stands, must have +returned to his master in high good feather. + +“I think, my dear Peter, I have found you something really unique. It is +a pestilent swamp to which a mighty river brings bitter blasts and +marrow-chilling fogs, while during the brief summer time the wind will +bring you sand. In this way you will combine the disadvantages of the +North Pole with those of the desert of Sahara.” + +In the winter time the Russians light their great stoves, and doubly +barricade their doors and windows; and in this atmosphere, like to that +of a greenhouse, many of their women will pass six months, never +venturing out of doors. Even the men only go out at intervals. Every +office, every shop is an oven. Men of forty have white hair and +parchment faces; and the women are old at thirty. The farm labourers, +during the few summer months, work almost entirely without sleep. They +leave that for the winter, when they shut themselves up like dormice in +their hovels, their store of food and vodka buried underneath the floor. +For days together they sleep, then wake and dig, then sleep again. + +The Russian party lasts all night. In an adjoining room are beds and +couches; half a dozen guests are always sleeping. An hour contents them, +then they rejoin the company, and other guests take their places. The +Russian eats when he feels so disposed; the table is always spread, the +guests come and go. Once a year there is a great feast in Moscow. The +Russian merchant and his friends sit down early in the day, and a sort of +thick, sweet pancake is served up hot. The feast continues for many +hours, and the ambition of the Russian merchant is to eat more than his +neighbour. Fifty or sixty of these hot cakes a man will consume at a +sitting, and a dozen funerals in Moscow is often the result. + +An uncivilised people, we call them in our lordly way, but they are +young. Russian history is not yet three hundred years old. They will +see us out, I am inclined to think. Their energy, their +intelligence—when these show above the groundwork—are monstrous. I have +known a Russian learn Chinese within six months. English! they learn it +while you are talking to them. The children play at chess and study the +violin for their own amusement. + +The world will be glad of Russia—when she has put her house in order. + + + + +HOW TO BE HAPPY THOUGH LITTLE. + + +FOLKS suffering from Jingoism, Spreadeagleism, Chauvinism—all such like +isms, to whatever country they belong—would be well advised to take a +tour in Holland. It is the idea of the moment that size spells +happiness. The bigger the country the better one is for living there. +The happiest Frenchman cannot possibly be as happy as the most wretched +Britisher, for the reason that Britain owns many more thousands of square +miles than France possesses. The Swiss peasant, compared with the +Russian serf, must, when he looks at the map of Europe and Asia, feel +himself to be a miserable creature. The reason that everybody in America +is happy and good is to be explained by the fact that America has an area +equal to that of the entire moon. The American citizen who has backed +the wrong horse, missed his train and lost his bag, remembers this and +feels bucked up again. + +According to this argument, fishes should be the happiest of mortals, the +sea consisting—at least, so says my atlas: I have not measured it +myself—of a hundred and forty-four millions of square miles. But, maybe, +the sea is also divided in ways we wot not of. Possibly the sardine who +lives near the Brittainy coast is sad and discontented because the +Norwegian sardine is the proud inhabitant of a larger sea. Perhaps that +is why he has left the Brittainy coast. Ashamed of being a Brittainy +sardine, he has emigrated to Norway, has become a naturalized Norwegian +sardine, and is himself again. + +The happy Londoner on foggy days can warm himself with the reflection +that the sun never sets on the British Empire. He does not often see the +sun, but that is a mere detail. He regards himself as the owner of the +sun; the sun begins his little day in the British Empire, ends his little +day in the British Empire: for all practical purposes the sun is part of +the British Empire. Foolish people in other countries sit underneath it +and feel warm, but that is only their ignorance. They do not know it is +a British possession; if they did they would feel cold. + +My views on this subject are, I know, heretical. I cannot get it into my +unpatriotic head that size is the only thing worth worrying about. In +England, when I venture to express my out-of-date opinions, I am called a +Little Englander. It fretted me at first; I was becoming a mere shadow. +But by now I have got used to it. It would be the same, I feel, wherever +I went. In New York I should be a Little American; in Constantinople a +Little Turk. But I wanted to talk about Holland. A holiday in Holland +serves as a corrective to exaggerated Imperialistic notions. + +There are no poor in Holland. They may be an unhappy people, knowing +what a little country it is they live in; but, if so, they hide the fact. +To all seeming, the Dutch peasant, smoking his great pipe, is as much a +man as the Whitechapel hawker or the moocher of the Paris boulevard. I +saw a beggar once in Holland—in the townlet of Enkhuisen. Crowds were +hurrying up from the side streets to have a look at him; the idea at +first seemed to be that he was doing it for a bet. He turned out to be a +Portuguese. They offered him work in the docks—until he could get +something better to do—at wages equal in English money to about ten +shillings a day. I inquired about him on my way back, and was told he +had borrowed a couple of forms from the foreman and had left by the +evening train. It is not the country for the loafer. + +In Holland work is easily found; this takes away the charm of looking for +it. A farm labourer in Holland lives in a brick-built house of six +rooms, which generally belongs to him, with an acre or so of ground, and +only eats meat once a day. The rest of his time he fills up on eggs and +chicken and cheese and beer. But you rarely hear him grumble. His wife +and daughter may be seen on Sundays wearing gold and silver jewellery +worth from fifty to one hundred pounds, and there is generally enough old +delft and pewter in the house to start a local museum anywhere outside +Holland. On high days and holidays, of which in Holland there are +plenty, the average Dutch _vrouw_ would be well worth running away with. +The Dutch peasant girl has no need of an illustrated journal once a week +to tell her what the fashion is; she has it in the portrait of her +mother, or of her grandmother, hanging over the glittering chimney-piece. + +When the Dutchwoman builds a dress she builds it to last; it descends +from mother to daughter, but it is made of sound material in the +beginning. A lady friend of mine thought the Dutch costume would serve +well for a fancy-dress ball, so set about buying one, but abandoned the +notion on learning what it would cost her. A Dutch girl in her Sunday +clothes must be worth fifty pounds before you come to ornaments. In +certain provinces she wears a close-fitting helmet, made either of solid +silver or of solid gold. The Dutch gallant, before making himself known, +walks on tiptoe a little while behind the Loved One, and looks at himself +in her head-dress just to make sure that his hat is on straight and his +front curl just where it ought to be. + +In most other European countries national costume is dying out. The +slop-shop is year by year extending its hideous trade. But the country +of Rubens and Rembrandt, of Teniers and Gerard Dow, remains still true to +art. The picture post-card does not exaggerate. The men in those +wondrous baggy knickerbockers, from the pockets of which you sometimes +see a couple of chicken’s heads protruding; in gaudy coloured shirts, in +worsted hose and mighty sabots, smoking their great pipes—the women in +their petticoats of many hues, in gorgeously embroidered vest, in +chemisette of dazzling white, crowned with a halo of many frills, +glittering in gold and silver—are not the creatures of an artist’s fancy. +You meet them in their thousands on holiday afternoons, walking gravely +arm in arm, flirting with sober Dutch stolidity. + +On colder days the women wear bright-coloured capes made of fine spun +silk, from underneath the ample folds of which you sometimes hear a +little cry; and sometimes a little hooded head peeps out, regards with +preternatural thoughtfulness the toy-like world without, then dives back +into shelter. As for the children—women in miniature, the single +difference in dress being the gay pinafore—you can only say of them that +they look like Dutch dolls. But such plump, contented, cheerful little +dolls! You remember the hollow-eyed, pale-faced dolls you see swarming +in the great, big and therefore should be happy countries, and wish that +mere land surface were of less importance to our statesmen and our able +editors, and the happiness and well-being of the mere human items worth a +little more of their thought. + +The Dutch peasant lives surrounded by canals, and reaches his cottage +across a drawbridge. I suppose it is in the blood of the Dutch child not +to tumble into a canal, and the Dutch mother never appears to anticipate +such possibility. One can imagine the average English mother trying to +bring up a family in a house surrounded by canals. She would never have +a minute’s peace until the children were in bed. But then the mere sight +of a canal to the English child suggests the delights of a sudden and +unexpected bath. I put it to a Dutchman once. Did the Dutch child by +any chance ever fall into a canal? + +“Yes,” he replied, “cases have been known.” + +“Don’t you do anything for it?” I enquired. + +“Oh, yes,” he answered, “we haul them out again.” + +“But what I mean is,” I explained, “don’t you do anything to prevent +their falling in—to save them from falling in again?” + +“Yes,” he answered, “we spank ’em.” + +There is always a wind in Holland; it comes from over the sea. There is +nothing to stay its progress. It leaps the low dykes and sweeps with a +shriek across the sad, soft dunes, and thinks it is going to have a good +time and play havoc in the land. But the Dutchman laughs behind his +great pipe as it comes to him shouting and roaring. “Welcome, my hearty, +welcome,” he chuckles, “come blustering and bragging; the bigger you are +the better I like you.” And when it is once in the land, behind the +long, straight dykes, behind the waving line of sandy dunes, he seizes +hold of it, and will not let it go till it has done its tale of work. + +The wind is the Dutchman’s; servant before he lets it loose again it has +turned ten thousand mills, has pumped the water and sawn the wood, has +lighted the town and worked the loom, and forged the iron, and driven the +great, slow, silent wherry, and played with the children in the garden. +It is a sober wind when it gets back to sea, worn and weary, leaving the +Dutchman laughing behind his everlasting pipe. There are canals in +Holland down which you pass as though a field of wind-blown corn; a soft, +low, rustling murmur ever in your ears. It is the ceaseless whirl of the +great mill sails. Far out at sea the winds are as foolish savages, +fighting, shrieking, tearing—purposeless. Here, in the street of mills, +it is a civilized wind, crooning softly while it labours. + +What charms one in Holland is the neatness and cleanliness of all about +one. Maybe to the Dutchman there are drawbacks. In a Dutch household +life must be one long spring-cleaning. No milk-pail is considered fit +that cannot just as well be used for a looking-glass. The great brass +pans, hanging under the pent house roof outside the cottage door, flash +like burnished gold. You could eat your dinner off the red-tiled floor, +but that the deal table, scrubbed to the colour of cream cheese, is more +convenient. By each threshold stands a row of empty sabots, and +woe-betide the Dutchman who would dream of crossing it in anything but +his stockinged feet. + +There is a fashion in sabots. Every spring they are freshly painted. +One district fancies an orange yellow, another a red, a third white, +suggesting purity and innocence. Members of the Smart Set indulge in +ornamentation; a frieze in pink, a star upon the toe. Walking in sabots +is not as easy as it looks. Attempting to run in sabots I do not +recommend to the beginner. + +“How do you run in sabots?” I asked a Dutchman once. I had been +experimenting, and had hurt myself. + +“We don’t run,” answered the Dutchman. + +And observation has proved to me he was right. The Dutch boy, when he +runs, puts them for preference on his hands, and hits other Dutch boys +over the head with them as he passes. + +The roads in Holland, straight and level, and shaded all the way with +trees, look, from the railway-carriage window, as if they would be good +for cycling; but this is a delusion. I crossed in the boat from Harwich +once, with a well-known black and white artist, and an equally well-known +and highly respected humorist. They had their bicycles with them, +intending to tour Holland. I met them a fortnight later in Delft, or, +rather, I met their remains. I was horrified at first. I thought it was +drink. They could not stand still, they could not sit still, they +trembled and shook in every limb, their teeth chattered when they tried +to talk. The humorist hadn’t a joke left in him. The artist could not +have drawn his own salary; he would have dropped it on the way to his +pocket. The Dutch roads are paved their entire length with cobbles—big, +round cobbles, over which your bicycle leaps and springs and plunges. + +If you would see Holland outside the big towns a smattering of Dutch is +necessary. If you know German there is not much difficulty. Dutch—I +speak as an amateur—appears to be very bad German mis-pronounced. +Myself, I find my German goes well in Holland, even better than in +Germany. The Anglo-Saxon should not attempt the Dutch G. It is hopeless +to think of succeeding, and the attempt has been known to produce +internal rupture. The Dutchman appears to keep his G in his stomach, and +to haul it up when wanted. Myself, I find the ordinary G, preceded by a +hiccough and followed by a sob, the nearest I can get to it. But they +tell me it is not quite right, yet. + +One needs to save up beforehand if one desires to spend any length of +time in Holland. One talks of dear old England, but the dearest land in +all the world is little Holland. The florin there is equal to the franc +in France and to the shilling in England. They tell you that cigars are +cheap in Holland. A cheap Dutch cigar will last you a day. It is not +until you have forgotten the taste of it that you feel you ever want to +smoke again. I knew a man who reckoned that he had saved hundreds of +pounds by smoking Dutch cigars for a month steadily. It was years before +he again ventured on tobacco. + +Watching building operations in Holland brings home to you forcibly, what +previously you have regarded as a meaningless formula—namely, that the +country is built upon piles. A dozen feet below the level of the street +one sees the labourers working in fishermen’s boots up to their knees in +water, driving the great wooden blocks into the mud. Many of the older +houses slope forward at such an angle that you almost fear to pass +beneath them. I should be as nervous as a kitten, living in one of the +upper storeys. But the Dutchman leans out of a window that is hanging +above the street six feet beyond the perpendicular, and smokes +contentedly. + +They have a merry custom in Holland of keeping the railway time twenty +minutes ahead of the town time—or is it twenty minutes behind? I never +can remember when I’m there, and I am not sure now. The Dutchman himself +never knows. + +“You’ve plenty of time,” he says + +“But the train goes at ten,” you say; “the station is a mile away, and it +is now half-past nine.” + +“Yes, but that means ten-twenty,” he answers, “you have nearly an hour.” + +Five minutes later he taps you on the shoulder. + +“My mistake, it’s twenty to ten. I was thinking it was the other way +about.” + +Another argues with him that his first idea was right. They work it out +by scientific methods. Meanwhile you have dived into a cab. The result +is always the same: you are either forty minutes too soon, or you have +missed the train by twenty minutes. A Dutch platform is always crowded +with women explaining volubly to their husbands either that there was not +any need to have hurried, or else that the thing would have been to have +started half an hour before they did, the man in both cases being, of +course, to blame. The men walk up and down and swear. + +The idea has been suggested that the railway time and the town time +should be made to conform. The argument against the idea is that if it +were carried out there would be nothing left to put the Dutchman out and +worry him. + + + + +SHOULD WE SAY WHAT WE THINK, OR THINK WHAT WE SAY? + + +A MAD friend of mine will have it that the characteristic of the age is +Make-Believe. He argues that all social intercourse is founded on +make-believe. A servant enters to say that Mr. and Mrs. Bore are in the +drawing-room. + +“Oh, damn!” says the man. + +“Hush!” says the woman. “Shut the door, Susan. How often am I to tell +you never to leave the door open?” + +The man creeps upstairs on tiptoe and shuts himself in his study. The +woman does things before a looking-glass, waits till she feels she is +sufficiently mistress of herself not to show her feelings, and then +enters the drawing-room with outstretched hands and the look of one +welcoming an angel’s visit. She says how delighted she is to see the +Bores—how good it was of them to come. Why did they not bring more Bores +with them? Where is naughty Bore junior? Why does he never come to see +her now? She will have to be really angry with him. And sweet little +Flossie Bore? Too young to pay calls! Nonsense. An “At Home” day is +not worth having where all the Bores are not. + +The Bores, who had hoped that she was out—who have only called because +the etiquette book told them that they must call at least four times in +the season, explain how they have been trying and trying to come. + +“This afternoon,” recounts Mrs. Bore, “we were determined to come. +‘John, dear,’ I said this morning, ‘I shall go and see dear Mrs. Bounder +this afternoon, no matter what happens.’” + +The idea conveyed is that the Prince of Wales, on calling at the Bores, +was told that he could not come in. He might call again in the evening +or come some other day. + +That afternoon the Bores were going to enjoy themselves in their own way; +they were going to see Mrs. Bounder. + +“And how is Mr. Bounder?” demands Mrs. Bore. + +Mrs. Bounder remains mute for a moment, straining her ears. She can hear +him creeping past the door on his way downstairs. She hears the front +door softly opened and closed-to. She wakes, as from a dream. She has +been thinking of the sorrow that will fall on Bounder when he returns +home later and learns what he has missed. + +And thus it is, not only with the Bores and Bounders, but even with us +who are not Bores or Bounders. Society in all ranks is founded on the +make-believe that everybody is charming; that we are delighted to see +everybody; that everybody is delighted to see us; that it is so good of +everybody to come; that we are desolate at the thought that they really +must go now. + +Which would we rather do—stop and finish our cigar or hasten into the +drawing-room to hear Miss Screecher sing? Can you ask us? We tumble +over each other in our hurry. Miss Screecher would really rather not +sing; but if we insist—We do insist. Miss Screecher, with pretty +reluctance, consents. We are careful not to look at one another. We sit +with our eyes fixed on the ceiling. Miss Screecher finishes, and rises. + +“But it was so short,” we say, so soon as we can be heard above the +applause. Is Miss Screecher quite sure that was the whole of it? Or has +she been playing tricks upon us, the naughty lady, defrauding us of a +verse? Miss Screecher assures us that the fault is the composer’s. But +she knows another. At this hint, our faces lighten again with gladness. +We clamour for more. + +Our host’s wine is always the most extraordinary we have ever tasted. +No, not another glass; we dare not—doctor’s orders, very strict. Our +host’s cigar! We did not know they made such cigars in this workaday +world. No, we really could not smoke another. Well, if he will be so +pressing, may we put it in our pocket? The truth is, we are not used to +high smoking. Our hostess’s coffee! Would she confide to us her secret? +The baby! We hardly trust ourselves to speak. The usual baby—we have +seen it. As a rule, to be candid, we never could detect much beauty in +babies—have always held the usual gush about them to be insincere. But +this baby! We are almost on the point of asking them where they got it. +It is just the kind we wanted for ourselves. Little Janet’s recitation: +“A Visit to the Dentist!” Hitherto the amateur reciter has not appealed +to us. But this is genius, surely. She ought to be trained for the +stage. Her mother does not altogether approve of the stage. We plead +for the stage—that it may not be deprived of such talent. + +Every bride is beautiful. Every bride looks charming in a simple costume +of—for further particulars see local papers. Every marriage is a cause +for universal rejoicing. With our wine-glass in our hand we picture the +ideal life we know to be in store for them. How can it be otherwise? +She, the daughter of her mother. (Cheers.) He—well, we all know him. +(More cheers.) Also involuntary guffaw from ill-regulated young man at +end of table, promptly suppressed. + +We carry our make-believe even into our religion. We sit in church, and +in voices swelling with pride, mention to the Almighty, at stated +intervals, that we are miserable worms—that there is no good in us. This +sort of thing, we gather, is expected of us; it does us no harm, and is +supposed to please. + +We make-believe that every woman is good, that every man is honest—until +they insist on forcing us, against our will, to observe that they are +not. Then we become very angry with them, and explain to them that they, +being sinners, are not folk fit to mix with us perfect people. Our +grief, when our rich aunt dies, is hardly to be borne. Drapers make +fortunes, helping us to express feebly our desolation. Our only +consolation is that she has gone to a better world. + +Everybody goes to a better world when they have got all they can out of +this one. + +We stand around the open grave and tell each other so. The clergyman is +so assured of it that, to save time, they have written out the formula +for him and had it printed in a little book. As a child it used to +surprise me—this fact that everybody went to heaven. Thinking of all the +people that had died, I pictured the place overcrowded. Almost I felt +sorry for the Devil, nobody ever coming his way, so to speak. I saw him +in imagination, a lonely old gentleman, sitting at his gate day after +day, hoping against hope, muttering to himself maybe that it hardly +seemed worth while, from his point of view, keeping the show open. An +old nurse whom I once took into my confidence was sure, if I continued +talking in this sort of way, that he would get me anyhow. I must have +been an evil-hearted youngster. The thought of how he would welcome me, +the only human being that he had seen for years, had a certain +fascination for me; for once in my existence I should be made a fuss +about. + +At every public meeting the chief speaker is always “a jolly good +fellow.” The man from Mars, reading our newspapers, would be convinced +that every Member of Parliament was a jovial, kindly, high-hearted, +generous-souled saint, with just sufficient humanity in him to prevent +the angels from carrying him off bodily. Do not the entire audience, +moved by one common impulse, declare him three times running, and in +stentorian voice, to be this “jolly good fellow”? So say all of them. +We have always listened with the most intense pleasure to the brilliant +speech of our friend who has just sat down. When you thought we were +yawning, we were drinking in his eloquence, open-mouthed. + +The higher one ascends in the social scale, the wider becomes this +necessary base of make-believe. When anything sad happens to a very big +person, the lesser people round about him hardly care to go on living. +Seeing that the world is somewhat overstocked with persons of importance, +and that something or another generally is happening to them, one wonders +sometimes how it is the world continues to exist. + +Once upon a time there occurred an illness to a certain good and great +man. I read in my daily paper that the whole nation was plunged in +grief. People dining in public restaurants, on being told the news by +the waiter, dropped their heads upon the table and sobbed. Strangers, +meeting in the street, flung their arms about one another and cried like +little children. I was abroad at the time, but on the point of returning +home. I almost felt ashamed to go. I looked at myself in the glass, and +was shocked at my own appearance: it was that of a man who had not been +in trouble for weeks. I felt that to burst upon this grief-stricken +nation with a countenance such as mine would be to add to their sorrow. +It was borne in upon me that I must have a shallow, egotistical nature. +I had had luck with a play in America, and for the life of me I could not +look grief-stricken. There were moments when, if I was not keeping a +watch over myself, I found myself whistling. + +Had it been possible I would have remained abroad till some stroke of +ill-fortune had rendered me more in tune with my fellow-countrymen. But +business was pressing. The first man I talked to on Dover pier was a +Customs House official. You might have thought sorrow would have made +him indifferent to a mere matter of forty-eight cigars. Instead of +which, he appeared quite pleased when he found them. He demanded +three-and-fourpence, and chuckled when he got it. On Dover platform a +little girl laughed because a lady dropped a handbox on a dog; but then +children are always callous—or, perhaps, she had not heard the news. + +What astonished me most, however, was to find in the railway carriage a +respectable looking man reading a comic journal. True, he did not laugh +much: he had got decency enough for that; but what was a grief-stricken +citizen doing with a comic journal, anyhow? Before I had been in London +an hour I had come to the conclusion that we English must be a people of +wonderful self-control. The day before, according to the newspapers, the +whole country was in serious danger of pining away and dying of a broken +heart. In one day the nation had pulled itself together. “We have cried +all day,” they had said to themselves, “we have cried all night. It does +not seem to have done much good. Now let us once again take up the +burden of life.” Some of them—I noticed it in the hotel dining-room that +evening—were taking quite kindly to their food again. + +We make believe about quite serious things. In war, each country’s +soldiers are always the most courageous in the world. The other +country’s soldiers are always treacherous and tricky; that is why they +sometimes win. Literature is the art of make-believe. + +“Now all of you sit round and throw your pennies in the cap,” says the +author, “and I will pretend that there lives in Bayswater a young lady +named Angelina, who is the most beautiful young lady that ever existed. +And in Notting Hill, we will pretend, there resides a young man named +Edwin, who is in love with Angelina.” + +And then, there being sufficient pennies in the cap, the author starts +away, and pretends that Angelina thought this and said that, and that +Edwin did all sorts of wonderful things. We know he is making it all up +as he goes along. We know he is making up just what he thinks will +please us. He, on the other hand, has to make-believe that he is doing +it because he cannot help it, he being an artist. But we know well +enough that, were we to stop throwing the pennies into the cap, he would +find out precious soon that he could. + +The theatrical manager bangs his drum. + +“Walk up! walk up!” he cries, “we are going to pretend that Mrs. Johnson +is a princess, and old man Johnson is going to pretend to be a pirate. +Walk up, walk up, and be in time!” + +So Mrs. Johnson, pretending to be a princess, comes out of a wobbly thing +that we agree to pretend is a castle; and old man Johnson, pretending to +be a pirate, is pushed up and down on another wobbly thing that we agree +to pretend is the ocean. Mrs. Johnson pretends to be in love with him, +which we know she is not. And Johnson pretends to be a very terrible +person; and Mrs. Johnson pretends, till eleven o’clock, to believe it. +And we pay prices, varying from a shilling to half-a-sovereign, to sit +for two hours and listen to them. + +But as I explained at the beginning, my friend is a mad sort of person. + + + + +IS THE AMERICAN HUSBAND MADE ENTIRELY OF STAINED GLASS. + + +I AM glad I am not an American husband. At first sight this may appear a +remark uncomplimentary to the American wife. It is nothing of the sort. +It is the other way about. We, in Europe, have plenty of opportunity of +judging the American wife. In America you hear of the American wife, you +are told stories about the American wife, you see her portrait in the +illustrated journals. By searching under the heading “Foreign +Intelligence,” you can find out what she is doing. But here in Europe we +know her, meet her face to face, talk to her, flirt with her. She is +charming, delightful. That is why I say I am glad I am not an American +husband. If the American husband only knew how nice was the American +wife, he would sell his business and come over here, where now and then +he could see her. + +Years ago, when I first began to travel about Europe, I argued to myself +that America must be a deadly place to live in. How sad it is, I thought +to myself, to meet thus, wherever one goes, American widows by the +thousand. In one narrow by-street of Dresden I calculated fourteen +American mothers, possessing nine-and-twenty American children, and not a +father among them—not a single husband among the whole fourteen. I +pictured fourteen lonely graves, scattered over the United States. I saw +as in a vision those fourteen head-stones of best material, hand-carved, +recording the virtues of those fourteen dead and buried husbands. + +Odd, thought I to myself, decidedly odd. These American husbands, they +must be a delicate type of humanity. The wonder is their mothers ever +reared them. They marry fine girls, the majority of them; two or three +sweet children are born to them, and after that there appears to be no +further use for them, as far as this world is concerned. Can nothing be +done to strengthen their constitutions? Would a tonic be of any help to +them? Not the customary tonic, I don’t mean, the sort of tonic merely +intended to make gouty old gentlemen feel they want to buy a hoop, but +the sort of tonic for which it was claimed that three drops poured upon a +ham sandwich and the thing would begin to squeak. + +It struck me as pathetic, the picture of these American widows leaving +their native land, coming over in shiploads to spend the rest of their +blighted lives in exile. The mere thought of America, I took it, had for +ever become to them distasteful. The ground that once his feet had +pressed! The old familiar places once lighted by his smile! Everything +in America would remind them of him. Snatching their babes to their +heaving bosoms they would leave the country where lay buried all the joy +of their lives, seek in the retirement of Paris, Florence or Vienna, +oblivion of the past. + +Also, it struck me as beautiful, the noble resignation with which they +bore their grief, hiding their sorrow from the indifferent stranger. +Some widows make a fuss, go about for weeks looking gloomy and depressed, +making not the slightest effort to be merry. These fourteen widows—I +knew them personally, all of them, I lived in the same street—what a +brave show of cheerfulness they put on! What a lesson to the common or +European widow, the humpy type of widow! One could spend whole days in +their company—I had done it—commencing quite early in the morning with a +sleighing excursion, finishing up quite late in the evening with a little +supper party, followed by an impromptu dance; and never detect from their +outward manner that they were not thoroughly enjoying themselves. + +From the mothers I turned my admiring eyes towards the children. This is +the secret of American success, said I to myself; this high-spirited +courage, this Spartan contempt for suffering. Look at them! the gallant +little men and women. Who would think that they had lost a father? Why, +I have seen a British child more upset at losing sixpence. + +Talking to a little girl one day, I enquired of her concerning the health +of her father. The next moment I could have bitten my tongue out, +remembering that there wasn’t such a thing as a father—not an American +father—in the whole street. She did not burst into tears as they do in +the story-books. She said: + +“He is quite well, thank you,” simply, pathetically, just like that. + +“I am sure of it,” I replied with fervour, “well and happy as he deserves +to be, and one day you will find him again; you will go to him.” + +“Ah, yes,” she answered, a shining light, it seemed to me, upon her fair +young face. “Momma says she is getting just a bit tired of this +one-horse sort of place. She is quite looking forward to seeing him +again.” + +It touched me very deeply: this weary woman, tired of her long +bereavement, actually looking forward to the fearsome passage leading to +where her loved one waited for her in a better land. + +For one bright breezy creature I grew to feel a real regard. All the +months that I had known her, seen her almost daily, never once had I +heard a single cry of pain escape her lips, never once had I heard her +cursing fate. Of the many who called upon her in her charming flat, not +one had ever, to my knowledge, offered her consolation or condolence. It +seemed to me cruel, callous. The over-burdened heart, finding no outlet +for its imprisoned grief, finding no sympathetic ear into which to pour +its tale of woe, breaks, we are told; anyhow, it isn’t good for it. I +decided—no one else seeming keen—that I would supply that sympathetic +ear. The very next time I found myself alone with her I introduced the +subject. + +“You have been living here in Dresden a long time, have you not?” I +asked. + +“About five years,” she answered, “on and off.” + +“And all alone,” I commented, with a sigh intended to invite to +confidence. + +“Well, hardly alone,” she corrected me, while a look of patient +resignation added dignity to her piquant features. “You see, there are +the dear children always round about me, during the holidays.” + +“Besides,” she added, “the people here are real kind to me; they hardly +ever let me feel myself alone. We make up little parties, you know, +picnics and excursions. And then, of course, there is the Opera and the +Symphony Concerts, and the subscription dances. The dear old king has +been doing a good deal this winter, too; and I must say the Embassy folks +have been most thoughtful, so far as I am concerned. No, it would not be +right for me to complain of loneliness, not now that I have got to know a +few people, as it were.” + +“But don’t you miss your husband?” I suggested. + +A cloud passed over her usually sunny face. “Oh, please don’t talk of +him,” she said, “it makes me feel real sad, thinking about him.” + +But having commenced, I was determined that my sympathy should not be +left to waste. + +“What did he die of?” I asked. + +She gave me a look the pathos of which I shall never forget. + +“Say, young man,” she cried, “are you trying to break it to me gently? +Because if so, I’d rather you told me straight out. What did he die of?” + +“Then isn’t he dead?” I asked, “I mean so far as you know.” + +“Never heard a word about his being dead till you started the idea,” she +retorted. “So far as I know he’s alive and well.” + +I said that I was sorry. I went on to explain that I did not mean I was +sorry to hear that in all probability he was alive and well. What I +meant was I was sorry I had introduced a painful subject. + +“What’s a painful subject?” + +“Why, your husband,” I replied. + +“But why should you call him a painful subject?” + +I had an idea she was getting angry with me. She did not say so. I +gathered it. But I had to explain myself somehow. + +“Well,” I answered, “I take it, you didn’t get on well together, and I am +sure it must have been his fault.” + +“Now look here,” she said, “don’t you breathe a word against my husband +or we shall quarrel. A nicer, dearer fellow never lived.” + +“Then what did you divorce him for?” I asked. It was impertinent, it was +unjustifiable. My excuse is that the mystery surrounding the American +husband had been worrying me for months. Here had I stumbled upon the +opportunity of solving it. Instinctively I clung to my advantage. + +“There hasn’t been any divorce,” she said. “There isn’t going to be any +divorce. You’ll make me cross in another minute.” + +But I was becoming reckless. “He is not dead. You are not divorced from +him. Where is he?” I demanded with some heat. + +“Where is he?” she replied, astonished. “Where should he be? At home, +of course.” + +I looked around the luxuriously-furnished room with its air of cosy +comfort, of substantial restfulness. + +“What home?” I asked. + +“What home! Why, our home, in Detroit.” + +“What is he doing there?” I had become so much in earnest that my voice +had assumed unconsciously an authoritative tone. Presumably, it +hypnotised her, for she answered my questions as though she had been in +the witness-box. + +“How do I know? How can I possibly tell you what he is doing? What do +people usually do at home?” + +“Answer the questions, madam, don’t ask them. What are you doing here? +Quite truthfully, if you please.” My eyes were fixed upon her. + +“Enjoying myself. He likes me to enjoy myself. Besides, I am educating +the children.” + +“You mean they are here at boarding-school while you are gadding about. +What is wrong with American education? When did you see your husband +last?” + +“Last? Let me see. No, last Christmas I was in Berlin. It must have +been the Christmas before, I think.” + +“If he is the dear kind fellow you say he is, how is it you haven’t seen +him for two years?” + +“Because, as I tell you, he is at home, in Detroit. How can I see him +when I am here in Dresden and he is in Detroit? You do ask foolish +questions. He means to try and come over in the summer, if he can spare +the time, and then, of course— + +“Answer my questions, please. I’ve spoken to you once about it. Do you +think you are performing your duty as a wife, enjoying yourself in +Dresden and Berlin while your husband is working hard in Detroit?” + +“He was quite willing for me to come. The American husband is a good +fellow who likes his wife to enjoy herself.” + +“I am not asking for your views on the American husband. I am asking +your views on the American wife—on yourself. The American husband +appears to be a sort of stained-glass saint, and you American wives are +imposing upon him. It is doing you no good, and it won’t go on for ever. +There will come a day when the American husband will wake up to the fact +he is making a fool of himself, and by over-indulgence, over-devotion, +turning the American woman into a heartless, selfish creature. What sort +of a home do you think it is in Detroit, with you and the children over +here? Tell me, is the American husband made entirely of driven snow, +with blood distilled from moonbeams, or is he composed of the ordinary +ingredients? Because, if the latter, you take my advice and get back +home. I take it that in America, proper, there are millions of real +homes where the woman does her duty and plays the game. But also it is +quite clear there are thousands of homes in America, mere echoing rooms, +where the man walks by himself, his wife and children scattered over +Europe. It isn’t going to work, it isn’t right that it should work.” + +“You take the advice of a sincere friend. Pack up—you and the +children—and get home.” + +I left. It was growing late. I felt it was time to leave. Whether she +took my counsel I cannot say. I only know that there still remain in +Europe a goodly number of American wives to whom it is applicable. + + + + +DOES THE YOUNG MAN KNOW EVERYTHING WORTH KNOWING? + + +I AM told that American professors are “mourning the lack of ideals” at +Columbia University—possibly also at other universities scattered through +the United States. If it be any consolation to these mourning American +professors, I can assure them that they do not mourn alone. I live not +far from Oxford, and enjoy the advantage of occasionally listening to the +jeremiads of English University professors. More than once a German +professor has done me the honour to employ me as an object on which to +sharpen his English. He also has mourned similar lack of ideals at +Heidelberg, at Bonn. Youth is youth all the world over; it has its own +ideals; they are not those of the University professor. The explanation +is tolerably simple. Youth is young, and the University professor, +generally speaking, is middle-aged. + +I can sympathise with the mourning professor. I, in my time, have +suffered like despair. I remember the day so well; it was my twelfth +birthday. I recall the unholy joy with which I reflected that for the +future my unfortunate parents would be called upon to pay for me full +railway fare; it marked a decided step towards manhood. I was now in my +teens. That very afternoon there came to visit us a relative of ours. +She brought with her three small children: a girl, aged six; a precious, +golden-haired thing in a lace collar that called itself a boy, aged five; +and a third still smaller creature, it might have been male, it might +have been female; I could not have told you at the time, I cannot tell +you now. This collection of atoms was handed over to me. + +“Now, show yourself a man,” said my dear mother, “remember you are in +your teens. Take them out for a walk and amuse them; and mind nothing +happens to them.” + +To the children themselves their own mother gave instructions that they +were to do everything that I told them, and not to tear their clothes or +make themselves untidy. These directions, even to myself, at the time, +appeared contradictory. But I said nothing. And out into the wilds the +four of us departed. + +I was an only child. My own infancy had passed from my memory. To me, +at twelve, the ideas of six were as incomprehensible as are those of +twenty to the University professor of forty. I wanted to be a pirate. +Round the corner and across the road building operations were in +progress. Planks and poles lay ready to one’s hand. Nature, in the +neighbourhood, had placed conveniently a shallow pond. It was Saturday +afternoon. The nearest public-house was a mile away. Immunity from +interference by the British workman was thus assured. It occurred to me +that by placing my three depressed looking relatives on one raft, +attacking them myself from another, taking the eldest girl’s sixpence +away from her, disabling their raft, and leaving them to drift without a +rudder, innocent amusement would be provided for half an hour at least. + +They did not want to play at pirates. At first sight of the pond the +thing that called itself a boy began to cry. The six-year-old lady said +she did not like the smell of it. Not even after I had explained the +game to them were they any the more enthusiastic for it. + +I proposed Red Indians. They could go to sleep in the unfinished +building upon a sack of lime, I would creep up through the grass, set +fire to the house, and dance round it, whooping and waving my tomahawk, +watching with fiendish delight the frantic but futile efforts of the +palefaces to escape their doom. + +It did not “catch on”—not even that. The precious thing in the lace +collar began to cry again. The creature concerning whom I could not have +told you whether it was male or female made no attempt at argument, but +started to run; it seemed to have taken a dislike to this particular +field. It stumbled over a scaffolding pole, and then it also began to +cry. What could one do to amuse such people? I left it to them to +propose something. They thought they would like to play at “Mothers”—not +in this field, but in some other field. + +The eldest girl would be mother. The other two would represent her +children. They had been taken suddenly ill. “Waterworks,” as I had +christened him, was to hold his hands to his middle and groan. His face +brightened up at the suggestion. The nondescript had the toothache. It +took up its part without a moment’s hesitation, and set to work to +scream. I could be the doctor and look at their tongues. + +That was their “ideal” game. As I have said, remembering that afternoon, +I can sympathise with the University professor mourning the absence of +University ideals in youth. Possibly at six my own ideal game may have +been “Mothers.” Looking back from the pile of birthdays upon which I now +stand, it occurs to me that very probably it was. But from the +perspective of twelve, the reflection that there were beings in the world +who could find recreation in such fooling saddened me. + +Eight years later, his father not being able to afford the time, I +conducted Master “Waterworks,” now a healthy, uninteresting, gawky lad, +to a school in Switzerland. It was my first Continental trip. I should +have enjoyed it better had he not been with me. He thought Paris a +“beastly hole.” He did not share my admiration for the Frenchwoman; he +even thought her badly dressed. + +“Why she’s so tied up, she can’t walk straight,” was the only impression +she left upon him. + +We changed the subject; it irritated me to hear him talk. The beautiful +Juno-like creatures we came across further on in Germany, he said were +too fat. He wanted to see them run. I found him utterly soulless. + +To expect a boy to love learning and culture is like expecting him to +prefer old vintage claret to gooseberry wine. Culture for the majority +is an acquired taste. Speaking personally, I am entirely in agreement +with the University professor. I find knowledge, prompting to +observation and leading to reflection, the most satisfactory luggage with +which a traveller through life can provide himself. I would that I had +more of it. To be able to enjoy a picture is of more advantage than to +be able to buy it. + +All that the University professor can urge in favour of idealism I am +prepared to endorse. But then I am—let us say, thirty-nine. At fourteen +my candid opinion was that he was talking “rot.” I looked at the old +gentleman himself—a narrow-chested, spectacled old gentleman, who lived +up a by street. He did not seem to have much fun of any sort. It was +not my ideal. He told me things had been written in a language called +Greek that I should enjoy reading, but I had not even read all Captain +Marryat. There were tales by Sir Walter Scott and “Jack Harkaway’s +Schooldays!” I felt I could wait a while. There was a chap called +Aristophanes who had written comedies, satirising the political +institutions of a country that had disappeared two thousand years ago. I +say, without shame, Drury Lane pantomime and Barnum’s Circus called to me +more strongly. + +Wishing to give the old gentleman a chance, I dipped into translations. +Some of these old fellows were not as bad as I had imagined them. A +party named Homer had written some really interesting stuff. Here and +there, maybe, he was a bit long-winded, but, taking him as a whole, there +was “go” in him. There was another of them—Ovid was his name. He could +tell a story, Ovid could. He had imagination. He was almost as good as +“Robinson Crusoe.” I thought it would please my professor, telling him +that I was reading these, his favourite authors. + +“Reading them!” he cried, “but you don’t know Greek or Latin.” + +“But I know English,” I answered; “they have all been translated into +English. You never told me that!” + +It appeared it was not the same thing. There were subtle delicacies of +diction bound to escape even the best translator. These subtle +delicacies of diction I could enjoy only by devoting the next seven or +eight years of my life to the study of Greek and Latin. It will grieve +the University professor to hear it, but the enjoyment of those subtle +delicacies of diction did not appear to me—I was only fourteen at the +time, please remember—to be worth the time and trouble. + +The boy is materially inclined—the mourning American professor has +discovered it. I did not want to be an idealist living up a back street. +I wanted to live in the biggest house in the best street of the town. I +wanted to ride a horse, wear a fur coat, and have as much to eat and +drink as ever I liked. I wanted to marry the most beautiful woman in the +world, to have my name in the newspaper, and to know that everybody was +envying me. + +Mourn over it, my dear professor, as you will—that is the ideal of youth; +and, so long as human nature remains what it is, will continue to be so. +It is a materialistic ideal—a sordid ideal. Maybe it is necessary. +Maybe the world would not move much if the young men started thinking too +early. They want to be rich, so they fling themselves frenziedly into +the struggle. They build the towns, and make the railway tracks, hew +down the forests, dig the ore out of the ground. There comes a day when +it is borne in upon them that trying to get rich is a poor sort of +game—that there is only one thing more tiresome than being a millionaire, +and that is trying to be a millionaire. But, meanwhile, the world has +got its work done. + +The American professor fears that the artistic development of America +leaves much to be desired. I fear the artistic development of most +countries leaves much to be desired. Why the Athenians themselves +sandwiched their drama between wrestling competitions and boxing bouts. +The plays of Sophocles, or Euripides, were given as “side shows.” The +chief items of the fair were the games and races. Besides, America is +still a young man. It has been busy “getting on in the world.” It has +not yet quite finished. Yet there are signs that young America is +approaching the thirty-nines. He is finding a little time, a little +money to spare for art. One can almost hear young America—not quite so +young as he was—saying to Mrs. Europe as he enters and closes the shop +door: + +“Well, ma’am, here I am, and maybe you’ll be glad to hear I’ve a little +money to spend. Yes, ma’am, I’ve fixed things all right across the +water; we shan’t starve. So now, ma’am, you and I can have a chat +concerning this art I’ve been hearing so much about. Let’s have a look +at it, ma’am, trot it out, and don’t you be afraid of putting a fair +price upon it.” + +I am inclined to think that Mrs. Europe has not hesitated to put a good +price upon the art she has sold to Uncle Sam. I am afraid Mrs. Europe +has occasionally “unloaded” on Uncle Sam. I talked to a certain dealer +one afternoon, now many years ago, at the Uwantit Club. + +“What is the next picture likely to be missing?” I asked him in the +course of general conversation. + +“Thome little thing of Hoppner’th, if it mutht be,” he replied with +confidence. + +“Hoppner,” I murmured, “I seem to have heard the name.” + +“Yeth; you’ll hear it a bit oftener during the next eighteen month or +tho. You take care you don’t get tired of hearing it, thath all,” he +laughed. “Yeth,” he continued, thoughtfully, “Reynoldth ith played out. +Nothing much to be made of Gainthborough, either. Dealing in that lot +now, why, it’th like keeping a potht offith. Hoppner’th the coming man.” + +“You’ve been buying Hoppners up cheap,” I suggested. + +“Between uth,” he answered, “yeth, I think we’ve got them all. Maybe a +few more. I don’t think we’ve mithed any.” + +“You will sell them for more than you gave for them,” I hinted. + +“You’re thmart,” he answered, regarding me admiringly, “you thee through +everything you do.” + +“How do you work it?” I asked him. There is a time in the day when he is +confidential. “Here is this man, Hoppner. I take it that you have +bought him up at an average of a hundred pounds a picture, and that at +that price most owners were fairly glad to sell. Few folks outside the +art schools have ever heard of him. I bet that at the present moment +there isn’t one art critic who could spell his name without reference to +a dictionary. In eighteen months you will be selling him for anything +from one thousand to ten thousand pounds. How is it done?” + +“How ith everything done that’th done well?” he answered. “By earnetht +effort.” He hitched his chair nearer to me, “I get a chap—one of your +thort of chapth—he writ’th an article about Hoppner. I get another to +anthwer him. Before I’ve done there’ll be a hundred articleth about +Hoppner—hith life, hith early thruggie, anecdo’th about hith wife. Then +a Hoppner will be thold at public auchtion for a thouthand guineath.” + +“But how can you be certain it will fetch a thousand guineas?” I +interrupted. + +“I happen to know the man whoth going to buy it.” He winked, and I +understood. + +“A fortnight later there will be a thale of half-a-dothen, and the prithe +will be gone up by that time.” + +“And after that?” I said. + +“After that,” he replied, rising, “the American millionaire! He’ll jutht +be waiting on the door-thtep for the thale-room to open.” + +“If by any chance I come across a Hoppner?” I said, laughing, as I turned +to go. + +“Don’t you hold on to it too long, that’th all,” was his advice. + + + + +HOW MANY CHARMS HATH MUSIC, WOULD YOU SAY? + + +THE argument of the late Herr Wagner was that grand opera—the music +drama, as he called it—included, and therefore did away with the +necessity for—all other arts. Music in all its branches, of course, it +provides: so much I will concede to the late Herr Wagner. There are +times, I confess, when my musical yearnings might shock the late Herr +Wagner—times when I feel unequal to following three distinct themes at +one and the same instant. + +“Listen,” whispers the Wagnerian enthusiast to me, “the cornet has now +the Brunnhilda motive.” It seems to me, in my then state of depravity, +as if the cornet had even more than this the matter with him. + +“The second violins,” continues the Wagnerian enthusiast, “are carrying +on the Wotan theme.” That they are carrying on goes without saying: the +players’ faces are streaming with perspiration. + +“The brass,” explains my friend—his object is to cultivate my ear—“is +accompanying the singers.” I should have said drowning them. There are +occasions when I can rave about Wagner with the best of them. High class +moods come to all of us. The difference between the really high-class +man and us commonplace, workaday men is the difference between, say, the +eagle and the barnyard chicken. I am the barnyard chicken. I have my +wings. There are ecstatic moments when I feel I want to spurn the sordid +earth and soar into the realms of art. I do fly a little, but my body is +heavy, and I only get as far as the fence. After a while I find it +lonesome on the fence, and I hop down again among my fellows. + +Listening to Wagner, during such temporary Philistinic mood, my sense of +fair play is outraged. A lone, lorn woman stands upon the stage trying +to make herself heard. She has to do this sort of thing for her living; +maybe an invalid mother, younger brothers and sisters are dependent upon +her. One hundred and forty men, all armed with powerful instruments, +well-organised, and most of them looking well-fed, combine to make it +impossible for a single note of that poor woman’s voice to be heard above +their din. I see her standing there, opening and shutting her mouth, +getting redder and redder in the face. She is singing, one feels sure of +it; one could hear her if only those one hundred and forty men would ease +up for a minute. She makes one mighty, supreme effort; above the banging +of the drums, the blare of the trumpets, the shrieking of the strings, +that last despairing note is distinctly heard. + +She has won, but the victory has cost her dear. She sinks down fainting +on the stage and is carried off by supers. Chivalrous indignation has +made it difficult for me to keep my seat watching the unequal contest. +My instinct was to leap the barrier, hurl the bald-headed chief of her +enemies from his high chair, and lay about me with the trombone or the +clarionet—whichever might have come the easier to my snatch. + +“You cowardly lot of bullies,” I have wanted to cry, “are you not ashamed +of yourselves? A hundred and forty of you against one, and that one a +still beautiful and, comparatively speaking, young lady. Be quiet for a +minute—can’t you? Give the poor girl a chance.” + +A lady of my acquaintance says that sitting out a Wagnerian opera seems +to her like listening to a singer accompanied by four orchestras playing +different tunes at the same time. As I have said, there are times when +Wagner carries me along with him, when I exult in the crash and whirl of +his contending harmonies. But, alas! there are those other moods—those +after dinner moods—when my desire is for something distinctly resembling +a tune. Still, there are other composers of grand opera besides Wagner. +I grant to the late Herr Wagner, that, in so far as music is concerned, +opera can supply us with all we can need. + +But it was also Wagner’s argument that grand opera could supply us with +acting, and there I am compelled to disagree with him. Wagner thought +that the arts of acting and singing could be combined. I have seen +artists the great man has trained himself. As singers they left nothing +to be desired, but the acting in grand opera has never yet impressed me. +Wagner never succeeded in avoiding the operatic convention and nobody +else ever will. When the operatic lover meets his sweetheart he puts her +in a corner and, turning his back upon her, comes down to the footlights +and tells the audience how he adores her. When he has finished, he, in +his turn, retires into the corner, and she comes down and tells the +audience that she is simply mad about him. + +Overcome with joy at finding she really cares for him, he comes down +right and says that this is the happiest moment of his life; and she +stands left, twelve feet away from him, and has the presentiment that all +this sort of thing is much too good to last. They go off together, +backwards, side by side. If there is any love-making, such as I +understand by the term, it is done “off.” This is not my idea of acting. +But I do not see how you are going to substitute for it anything more +natural. When you are singing at the top of your voice, you don’t want a +heavy woman hanging round your neck. When you are killing a man and +warbling about it at the same time, you don’t want him fooling around you +defending himself. You want him to have a little reasonable patience, +and to wait in his proper place till you have finished, telling him, or +rather telling the crowd, how much you hate and despise him. + +When the proper time comes, and if he is where you expect to find him +while thinking of your upper C, you will hit him lightly on the shoulder +with your sword, and then he can die to his own particular tune. If you +have been severely wounded in battle, or in any other sort of row, and +have got to sing a long ballad before you finally expire, you don’t want +to have to think how a man would really behave who knew he had only got a +few minutes to live and was feeling bad about it. The chances are that +he would not want to sing at all. The woman who really loved him would +not encourage him to sing. She would want him to keep quiet while she +moved herself about a bit, in case there was anything that could be done +for him. + +If a mob is climbing the stairs thirsting for your blood, you do not want +to stand upright with your arms stretched out, a good eighteen inches +from the door, while you go over at some length the varied incidents +leading up to the annoyance. If your desire were to act naturally you +would push against that door for all you were worth, and yell for +somebody to bring you a chest of drawers and a bedstead, and things like +that, to pile up against it. If you were a king, and were giving a +party, you would not want your guests to fix you up at the other end of +the room and leave you there, with nobody to talk to but your own wife, +while they turned their backs upon you, and had a long and complicated +dance all to themselves. You would want to be in it; you would want to +let them know that you were king. + +In acting, all these little points have to be considered. In opera, +everything is rightly sacrificed to musical necessity. I have seen the +young, enthusiastic opera-singer who thought that he or she could act and +sing at the same time. The experienced artist takes the centre of the +stage and husbands his resources. Whether he is supposed to be indignant +because somebody has killed his mother, or cheerful because he is going +out to fight his country’s foes, who are only waiting until he has +finished singing to attack the town, he leaves it to the composer to make +clear. + +Also it was Herr Wagner’s idea that the back cloth would leave the +opera-goer indifferent to the picture gallery. The castle on the rock, +accessible only by balloon, in which every window lights up +simultaneously and instantaneously, one minute after sunset, while the +full moon is rushing up the sky at the pace of a champion comet—that +wonderful sea that suddenly opens and swallows up the ship—those +snow-clad mountains, over which the shadow of the hero passes like a +threatening cloud—the grand old chateau, trembling in the wind—what need, +will ask the opera-goer of the future, of your Turners and your Corots, +when, for prices ranging from a shilling upwards, we can have a dozen +pictures such as these rolled up and down before us every evening? + +But perhaps the most daring hope of all was the dream that came to Herr +Wagner that his opera singers, his grouped choruses, would eventually +satisfy the craving of the public for high class statuary. I am not +quite sure the general public does care for statuary. I do not know +whether the idea has ever occurred to the Anarchist, but, were I myself +organising secret committee meetings for unholy purposes, I should invite +my comrades to meet in that section of the local museum devoted to +statuary. I can conceive of no place where we should be freer from +prying eyes and listening ears. A select few, however, do appreciate +statuary; and such, I am inclined to think, will not be weaned from their +passion by the contemplation of the opera singer in his or her various +quaint costumes. + +And even if the tenor always satisfied our ideal of Apollo, and the +soprano were always as sylph-like as she is described in the libretto, +even then I should doubt the average operatic chorus being regarded by +the _connoisseur_ as a cheap and pleasant substitute for a bas relief +from the Elgin marbles. The great thing required of that operatic chorus +is experience. The young and giddy-pated the chorus master has no use +for. The sober, honest, industrious lady or gentleman, with a knowledge +of music is very properly his ideal. + +What I admire about the chorus chiefly is its unity. The whole village +dresses exactly alike. In wicked, worldly villages there is rivalry, +leading to heartburn and jealously. One lady comes out suddenly, on, +say, a Bank Holiday, in a fetching blue that conquers every male heart. +Next holiday her rival cuts her out with a green hat. In the operatic +village it must be that the girls gather together beforehand to arrange +this thing. There is probably a meeting called. + +“The dear Count’s wedding,” announces the chairwoman, “you will all be +pleased to hear, has been fixed for the fourteenth, at eleven o’clock in +the morning. The entire village will be assembled at ten-thirty to await +the return of the bridal _cortège_ from the church, and offer its +felicitations. Married ladies, will, of course, come accompanied by +their husbands. Unmarried ladies must each bring a male partner as near +their own height as possible. Fortunately, in this village the number of +males is exactly equal to that of females, so that the picture need not +be spoiled. The children will organise themselves into an independent +body and will group themselves picturesquely. It has been thought +advisable,” continues the chairwoman, “that the village should meet the +dear Count and his bride at some spot not too far removed from the local +alehouse. The costume to be worn by the ladies will consist of a short +pink skirt terminating at the knees and ornamented with festoons of +flowers; above will be worn a bolero in mauve silk without sleeves and +cut _décolleté_. The shoes should be of yellow satin over flesh-coloured +stockings. Ladies who are ‘out’ will wear pearl necklaces, and a simple +device in emeralds to decorate the hair. Thank God, we can all of us +afford it, and provided the weather holds up and nothing unexpected +happens—he is not what I call a lucky man, our Count, and it is always as +well to be prepared for possibilities—well, I think we may look forward +to a really pleasant day.” + +It cannot be done, Herr Wagner, believe me. You cannot substitute the +music drama for all the arts combined. The object to be aimed at by the +wise composer should be to make us, while listening to his music, +forgetful of all remaining artistic considerations. + + + + +THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN! NEED IT BE SO HEAVY? + + +IT is a delightful stroll on a sunny summer morning from the Hague to the +Huis ten Bosch, the little “house in the wood,” built for Princess +Amalia, widow of Stadtholter Frederick Henry, under whom Holland escaped +finally from the bondage of her foes and entered into the promised land +of Liberty. Leaving the quiet streets, the tree-bordered canals, with +their creeping barges, you pass through a pleasant park, where the +soft-eyed deer press round you, hurt and indignant if you have brought +nothing in your pocket—not even a piece of sugar—to offer them. It is +not that they are grasping—it is the want of attention that wounds them. + +“I thought he was a gentleman,” they seem to be saying to one another, if +you glance back, “he looked like a gentleman.” + +Their mild eyes haunt you; on the next occasion you do not forget. The +Park merges into the forest; you go by winding ways till you reach the +trim Dutch garden, moat-encircled, in the centre of which stands the prim +old-fashioned villa, which, to the simple Dutchman, appears a palace. +The _concierge_, an old soldier, bows low to you and introduces you to +his wife—a stately, white-haired dame, who talks most languages a little, +so far as relates to all things within and appertaining to this tiny +palace of the wood. To things without, beyond the wood, her powers of +conversation do not extend: apparently such matters do not interest her. + +She conducts you to the Chinese Room; the sun streams through the +windows, illuminating the wondrous golden dragons standing out in bold +relief from the burnished lacquer work, decorating still further with +light and shade the delicate silk embroideries thin taper hands have +woven with infinite pains. The walls are hung with rice paper, depicting +the conventional scenes of the conventional Chinese life. + +You find your thoughts wandering. These grotesque figures, these +caricatures of humanity! A comical creature, surely, this Chinaman, the +pantaloon of civilization. How useful he has been to us for our farces, +our comic operas! This yellow baby, in his ample pinafore, who lived +thousands of years ago, who has now passed into this strange second +childhood. + +But is he dying—or does the life of a nation wake again, as after sleep? +Is he this droll, harmless thing he here depicts himself? And if not? +Suppose fresh sap be stirring through his three hundred millions? We +thought he was so very dead; we thought the time had come to cut him up +and divide him, the only danger being lest we should quarrel over his +carcase among ourselves. + +Suppose it turns out as the fable of the woodcutter and the bear? The +woodcutter found the bear lying in the forest. At first he was much +frightened, but the bear lay remarkably still. So the woodman crept +nearer, ventured to kick the bear—very gently, ready to run if need be. +Surely the bear was dead! And parts of a bear are good to eat, and +bearskin to poor woodfolk on cold winter nights is grateful. So the +woodman drew his knife and commenced the necessary preliminaries. But +the bear was not dead. + +If the Chinaman be not dead? If the cutting-up process has only served +to waken him? In a little time from now we shall know. + +From the Chinese Room the white-haired dame leads us to the Japanese +Room. Had gentle-looking Princess Amalia some vague foreshadowing of the +future in her mind when she planned these two rooms leading into one +another? The Japanese decorations are more grotesque, the designs less +cheerfully comical than those of cousin Chinaman. These monstrous, +mis-shapen wrestlers, these patient-looking gods, with their inscrutable +eyes! Was it always there, or is it only by the light of present events +that one reads into the fantastic fancies of the artist working long ago +in the doorway of his paper house, a meaning that has hitherto escaped +us? + +But the chief attraction of the Huis ten Bosch is the gorgeous Orange +Saloon, lighted by a cupola, fifty feet above the floor, the walls one +blaze of pictures, chiefly of the gorgeous Jordaen school—“The Defeat of +the Vices,” “Time Vanquishing Slander”—mostly allegorical, in praise of +all the virtues, in praise of enlightenment and progress. Aptly enough +in a room so decorated, here was held the famous Peace Congress that +closed the last century. One can hardly avoid smiling as one thinks of +the solemn conclave of grandees assembled to proclaim the popularity of +Peace. + +It was in the autumn of the same year that Europe decided upon the +dividing-up of China, that soldiers were instructed by Christian monarchs +to massacre men, women and children, the idea being to impress upon the +Heathen Chinee the superior civilization of the white man. The Boer war +followed almost immediately. Since when the white man has been pretty +busy all over the world with his “expeditions” and his “missions.” The +world is undoubtedly growing more refined. We do not care for ugly +words. Even the burglar refers airily to the “little job” he has on +hand. You would think he had found work in the country. I should not be +surprised to learn that he says a prayer before starting, telegraphs home +to his anxious wife the next morning that his task has been crowned with +blessing. + +Until the far-off date of Universal Brotherhood war will continue. +Matters considered unimportant by both parties will—with a mighty +flourish of trumpets—be referred to arbitration. I was talking of a +famous financier a while ago with a man who had been his secretary. +Amongst other anecdotes, he told me of a certain agreement about which +dispute had arisen. The famous financier took the paper into his own +hands and made a few swift calculations. + +“Let it go,” he concluded, “it is only a thousand pounds at the outside. +May as well be honest.” + +Concerning a dead fisherman or two, concerning boundaries through +unproductive mountain ranges we shall arbitrate and feel virtuous. For +gold mines and good pasture lands, mixed up with a little honour to give +respectability to the business, we shall fight it out, as previously. +War being thus inevitable, the humane man will rejoice that by one of +those brilliant discoveries, so simple when they are explained, war in +the future is going to be rendered equally satisfactory to victor and to +vanquished. + +In by-elections, as a witty writer has pointed out, there are no +defeats—only victories and moral victories. The idea seems to have +caught on. War in the future is evidently going to be conducted on the +same understanding. Once upon a time, from a far-off land, a certain +general telegraphed home congratulating his Government that the enemy had +shown no inclination whatever to prevent his running away. The whole +country rejoiced. + +“Why, they never even tried to stop him,” citizens, meeting other +citizens in the street, told each other. “Ah, they’ve had enough of him. +I bet they are only too glad to get rid of him. Why, they say he ran for +miles without seeing a trace of the foe.” + +The enemy’s general, on the other hand, also wrote home congratulating +his Government. In this way the same battle can be mafficked over by +both parties. Contentment is the great secret of happiness. Everything +happens for the best, if only you look at it the right way. That is +going to be the argument. The general of the future will telegraph to +headquarters that he is pleased to be able to inform His Majesty that the +enemy, having broken down all opposition, has succeeded in crossing the +frontier and is now well on his way to His Majesty’s capital. + +“I am luring him on,” he will add, “as fast as I can. At our present +rate of progress, I am in hopes of bringing him home by the tenth.” + +Lest foolish civilian sort of people should wonder whereabouts lies the +cause for rejoicing, the military man will condescend to explain. The +enemy is being enticed farther and farther from his base. The defeated +general—who is not really defeated, who is only artful, and who appears +to be running away, is not really running away at all. On the contrary, +he is running home—bringing, as he explains, the enemy with him. + +If I remember rightly—it is long since I played it—there is a parlour +game entitled “Puss in the Corner.” You beckon another player to you +with your finger. “Puss, puss!” you cry. Thereupon he has to leave his +chair—his “base,” as the military man would term it—and try to get to you +without anything happening to him. + +War in the future is going to be Puss in the Corner on a bigger scale. +You lure your enemy away from his base. If all goes well—if he does not +see the trap that is being laid for him—why, then, almost before he knows +it, he finds himself in your capital. That finishes the game. You find +out what it is he really wants. Provided it is something within reason, +and you happen to have it handy, you give it to him. He goes home +crowing, and you, on your side, laugh when you think how cleverly you +succeeded in luring him away from his base. + +There is a bright side to all things. The gentleman charged with the +defence of a fortress will meet the other gentleman who has captured it +and shake hands with him mid the ruins. + +“So here you are at last!” he will explain. “Why didn’t you come before? +We have been waiting for you.” + +And he will send off dispatches felicitating his chief on having got that +fortress off their hands, together with all the worry and expense it has +been to them. When prisoners are taken you will console yourself with +the reflection that the cost of feeding them for the future will have to +be borne by the enemy. Captured cannon you will watch being trailed away +with a sigh of relief. + +“Confounded heavy things!” you will say to yourself. “Thank goodness +I’ve got rid of them. Let him have the fun of dragging them about these +ghastly roads. See how he likes the job!” + +War is a ridiculous method of settling disputes. Anything that can tend +to make its ridiculous aspect more apparent is to be welcomed. The new +school of military dispatch-writers may succeed in turning even the +laughter of the mob against it. + +The present trouble in the East would never have occurred but for the +white man’s enthusiasm for bearing other people’s burdens. What we call +the yellow danger is the fear that the yellow man may before long request +us, so far as he is concerned, to put his particular burden down. It may +occur to him that, seeing it is his property, he would just as soon carry +it himself. A London policeman told me a story the other day that struck +him as an example of Cockney humour under trying circumstances. But it +may also serve as a fable. From a lonely street in the neighbourhood of +Covent Garden, early one morning, the constable heard cries of “Stop +thief!” shouted in a childish treble. He arrived on the scene just in +time to collar a young hooligan, who, having snatched a basket of fruit +from a small lad—a greengrocer’s errand boy, as it turned out—was, with +it, making tracks. The greengrocer’s boy, between panting and tears, +delivered his accusation. The hooligan regarded him with an expression +of amazed indignation. + +“What d’yer mean, stealing it?” exclaimed Mr. Hooligan. “Why, I was +carrying it for yer!” + +The white man has got into the way of “carrying” other people’s burdens, +and now it looks as if the yellow man were going to object to our +carrying his any further. Maybe he is going to get nasty, and insist on +carrying it himself. We call this “the yellow danger.” + +A friend of mine—he is a man who in the street walks into lamp-posts, and +apologises—sees rising from the East the dawn of a new day in the world’s +history. The yellow danger is to him a golden hope. He sees a race long +stagnant, stretching its giant limbs with the first vague movements of +returning life. He is a poor sort of patriot; he calls himself, I +suppose, a white man, yet he shamelessly confesses he would rather see +Asia’s millions rise from the ruins of their ancient civilization to take +their part in the future of humanity, than that half the population of +the globe should remain bound in savagery for the pleasure and the profit +of his own particular species. + +He even goes so far as to think that the white man may have something to +learn. The world has belonged to him now for some thousands of years. +Has he done all with it that could have been done? Are his ideals the +last word? + +Not what the yellow man has absorbed from Europe, but what he is going to +give Europe it is that interests my friend. He is watching the birth of +a new force—an influence as yet unknown. He clings to the fond belief +that new ideas, new formulæ, to replace the old worn shibboleths, may, +during these thousands of years, have been developing in those keen +brains that behind the impressive yellow mask have been working so long +in silence and in mystery. + + + + +WHY DIDN’T HE MARRY THE GIRL? + + +WHAT is wrong with marriage, anyhow? I find myself pondering this +question so often, when reading high-class literature. I put it to +myself again the other evening, during a performance of Faust. Why could +not Faust have married the girl? I would not have married her myself for +any consideration whatsoever; but that is not the argument. Faust, +apparently, could not see anything amiss with her. Both of them were mad +about each other. Yet the idea of a quiet, unostentatious marriage with +a week’s honeymoon, say, in Vienna, followed by a neat little cottage +_orné_, not too far from Nürnberg, so that their friends could have come +out to them, never seems to have occurred to either of them. + +There could have been a garden. Marguerite might have kept chickens and +a cow. That sort of girl, brought up to hard work and by no means too +well educated, is all the better for having something to do. Later, with +the gradual arrival of the family, a good, all-round woman might have +been hired in to assist. Faust, of course, would have had his study and +got to work again; that would have kept him out of further mischief. The +idea that a brainy man, his age, was going to be happy with nothing to do +all day but fool round a petticoat was ridiculous from the beginning. +Valentine—a good fellow, Valentine, with nice ideas—would have spent his +Saturdays to Monday with them. Over a pipe and a glass of wine, he and +Faust would have discussed the local politics. + +He would have danced the children on his knee, have told them tales about +the war—taught the eldest boy to shoot. Faust, with a practical man like +Valentine to help him, would probably have invented a new gun. Valentine +would have got it taken up. + +Things might have come of it. Sybil, in course of time, would have +married and settled down—perhaps have taken a little house near to them. +He and Marguerite would have joked—when Mrs. Sybil was not around—about +his early infatuation. The old mother would have toddled over from +Nürnberg—not too often, just for the day. + +The picture grows upon one the more one thinks of it. Why did it never +occur to them? There would have been a bit of a bother with the Old Man. +I can imagine Mephistopheles being upset about it, thinking himself +swindled. Of course, if that was the reason—if Faust said to himself: + +“I should like to marry the girl, but I won’t do it; it would not be fair +to the Old Man; he has been to a lot of trouble working this thing up; in +common gratitude I cannot turn round now and behave like a decent, +sensible man; it would not be playing the game”—if this was the way Faust +looked at the matter there is nothing more to be said. Indeed, it shows +him in rather a fine light—noble, if quixotic. + +If, on the other hand, he looked at the question from the point of view +of himself and the girl, I think the thing might have been managed. All +one had to do in those days when one wanted to get rid of the Devil was +to show him a sword hilt. Faust and Marguerite could have slipped into a +church one morning, and have kept him out of the way with a sword hilt +till the ceremony was through. They might have hired a small boy: + +“You see the gentleman in red? Well, he wants us and we don’t want him. +That is the only difference between us. Now, you take this sword, and +when you see him coming show him the hilt. Don’t hurt him; just show him +the sword and shake your head. He will understand.” + +The old gentleman’s expression, when subsequently Faust presented him to +Marguerite, would have been interesting: + +“Allow me, my wife. My dear, a—a friend of mine. You may remember +meeting him that night at your aunt’s.” + +As I have said, there would have been ructions; but I do not myself see +what could have been done. There was nothing in the bond to the effect +that Faust should not marry, so far as we are told. The Old Man had a +sense of humour. My own opinion is that, after getting over the first +annoyance, he himself would have seen the joke. I can even picture him +looking in now and again on Mr. and Mrs. Faust. The children would be +hurried off to bed. There would be, for a while, an atmosphere of +constraint. + +But the Old Man had a way with him. He would have told one or two +stories at which Marguerite would have blushed, at which Faust would have +grinned. I can see the old fellow occasionally joining the homely social +board. The children, awed at first, would have sat silent, with staring +eyes. But, as I have said, the Old Man had a way with him. Why should +he not have reformed? The good woman’s unconsciously exerted +influence—the sweet childish prattle! One hears of such things. Might +he not have come to be known as “Nunkie”? + +Myself—I believe I have already mentioned it—I would not have married +Marguerite. She is not my ideal of a good girl. I never liked the way +she deceived her mother. And that aunt of hers! Well, a nice girl would +not have been friends with such a woman. She did not behave at all too +well to Sybil, either. It is clear to me that she led the boy on. And +what was she doing with that box of jewels, anyhow? She was not a fool. +She could not have gone every day to that fountain, chatted with those +girl friends of hers, and learnt nothing. She must have known that +people don’t go leaving twenty thousand pounds’ worth of jewels about on +doorsteps as part of a round game. Her own instinct, if she had been a +good girl, would have told her to leave the thing alone. + +I don’t believe in these innocent people who do not know what they are +doing half their time. Ask any London magistrate what he thinks of the +lady who explains that she picked up the diamond brooch:— + +“Not meaning, of course, your Worship, to take it. I would not do such a +thing. It just happened this way, your Worship. I was standing as you +might say here, and not seeing anyone about in the shop I opened the case +and took it out, thinking as perhaps it might belong to someone; and then +this gentleman here, as I had not noticed before, comes up quite suddenly +and says; ‘You come along with me,’ he says. ‘What for,’ I says, ‘when I +don’t even know you?’ I says. ‘For stealing,’ he says. ‘Well, that’s a +hard word to use to a lady,’ I says; ‘I don’t know what you mean, I’m +sure.’” + +And if she had put them all on, not thinking, what would a really nice +girl have done when the gentleman came up and assured her they were hers? +She would have been thirty seconds taking them off and flinging them back +into the box. + +“Thank you,” she would have said, “I’ll trouble you to leave this garden +as quickly as you entered it and take them with you. I’m not that sort +of girl.” + +Marguerite clings to the jewels, and accepts the young man’s arm for a +moonlight promenade. And when it does enter into her innocent head that +he and she have walked that shady garden long enough, what does she do +when she has said good-bye and shut the door? She opens the ground-floor +window and begins to sing! + +Maybe I am not poetical, but I do like justice. When other girls do +these sort of things they get called names. I cannot see why this +particular girl should be held up as an ideal. She kills her mother. +According to her own account this was an accident. It is not an original +line of defence, and we are not allowed to hear the evidence for the +prosecution. She also kills her baby. You are not to blame her for +that, because at the time she was feeling poorly. I don’t see why this +girl should have a special line of angels to take her up to heaven. +There must have been decent, hard-working women in Nürnburg more entitled +to the ticket. + +Why is it that all these years we have been content to accept Marguerite +as a type of innocence and virtue? The explanation is, I suppose, that +Goethe wrote at a time when it was the convention to regard all women as +good. Anything in petticoats was virtuous. If she did wrong it was +always somebody else’s fault. _Cherchez la femme_ was a later notion. +In the days of Goethe it was always _Cherchez l’homme_. It was the man’s +fault. It was the devil’s fault. It was anybody’s fault you liked, but +not her’s. + +The convention has not yet died out. I was reading the other day a most +interesting book by a brilliant American authoress. Seeing I live far +away from the lady’s haunts, I venture to mention names. I am speaking +of “Patience Sparhawk,” by Gertrude Atherton. I take this book because +it is typical of a large body of fiction. Miss Sparhawk lives a troubled +life: it puzzles her. She asks herself what is wrong. Her own idea is +that it is civilisation. + +If it is not civilisation, then it is the American man or Nature—or +Democracy. Miss Sparhawk marries the wrong man. Later on she gets +engaged to another wrong man. In the end we are left to believe she is +about to be married to the right man. I should be better satisfied if I +could hear Miss Sparhawk talking six months after that last marriage. +But if a mistake has again been made I am confident that, in Miss +Sparhawk’s opinion, the fault will not be Miss Sparhawk’s. The argument +is always the same: Miss Sparhawk, being a lady, can do no wrong. + +If Miss Sparhawk cared to listen to me for five minutes, I feel I could +put her right on this point. + +“It is quite true, my dear girl,” I should say to her, “something is +wrong—very wrong. But it is not the American man. Never you mind the +American man: you leave him to worry out his own salvation. You are not +the girl to put him right, even where he is wrong. And it is not +civilisation. Civilisation has a deal to answer for, I admit: don’t you +load it up with this additional trouble. The thing that is wrong in this +case of yours—if you will forgive my saying so—is you. You make a fool +of yourself; you marry a man who is a mere animal because he appeals to +your animal instincts. Then, like the lady who cried out ‘Alack, I’ve +married a black,’ you appeal to heaven against the injustice of being +mated with a clown. You are not a nice girl, either in your ideas or in +your behaviour. I don’t blame you for it; you did not make yourself. +But when you set to work to attract all that is lowest in man, why be so +astonished at your own success? There are plenty of shocking American +men, I agree. One meets the class even outside America. But nice +American girls will tell you that there are also nice American men. +There is an old proverb about birds of a feather. Next time you find +yourself in the company of a shocking American man, you just ask yourself +how he got there, and how it is he seems to be feeling at home. You +learn self-control. Get it out of your head that you are the centre of +the universe, and grasp the idea that a petticoat is not a halo, and you +will find civilisation not half as wrong as you thought it.” + +I know what Miss Sparhawk’s reply would be. + +“You say all this to me—to me, a lady? Great Heavens! What has become +of chivalry?” + +A Frenchman was once put on trial for murdering his father and mother. +He confessed his guilt, but begged for mercy on the plea that he was an +orphan. Chivalry was founded on the assumption that woman was worthy to +be worshipped. The modern woman’s notion is that when she does wrong she +ought to be excused by chivalrous man because she is a lady. + +I like the naughty heroine; we all of us do. The early Victorian +heroine—the angel in a white frock, was a bore. We knew exactly what she +was going to do—the right thing. We did not even have to ask ourselves, +“What will she think is the right thing to do under the circumstances?” +It was always the conventional right thing. You could have put it to a +Sunday school and have got the answer every time. The heroine with +passions, instincts, emotions, is to be welcomed. But I want her to +grasp the fact that after all she is only one of us. I should like her +better if, instead of demanding: + +“What is wrong in civilisation? What is the world coming to?” and so +forth, she would occasionally say to herself: + +“Guess I’ve made a fool of myself this time. I do feel that ’shamed of +myself.” + +She would not lose by it. We should respect her all the more. + + + + +WHAT MRS. WILKINS THOUGHT ABOUT IT. + + +LAST year, travelling on the Underground Railway, I met a man; he was one +of the saddest-looking men I had seen for years. I used to know him well +in the old days when we were journalists together. I asked him, in a +sympathetic tone, how things were going with him. I expected his +response would be a flood of tears, and that in the end I should have to +fork out a fiver. To my astonishment, his answer was that things were +going exceedingly well with him. I did not want to say to him bluntly: + +“Then what has happened to you to make you look like a mute at a +temperance funeral?” I said: + +“And how are all at home?” + +I thought that if the trouble lay there he would take the opportunity. +It brightened him somewhat, the necessity of replying to the question. +It appeared that his wife was in the best of health. + +“You remember her,” he continued with a smile; “wonderful spirits, always +cheerful, nothing seems to put her out, not even—” + +He ended the sentence abruptly with a sigh. + +His mother-in-law, I learned from further talk with him, had died since I +had last met him, and had left them a comfortable addition to their +income. His eldest daughter was engaged to be married. + +“It is entirely a love match,” he explained, “and he is such a dear, good +fellow, that I should not have made any objection even had he been poor. +But, of course, as it is, I am naturally all the more content.” + +His eldest boy, having won the Mottle Scholarship, was going up to +Cambridge in the Autumn. His own health, he told me, had greatly +improved; and a novel he had written in his leisure time promised to be +one of the successes of the season. Then it was that I spoke plainly. + +“If I am opening a wound too painful to be touched,” I said, “tell me. +If, on the contrary, it is an ordinary sort of trouble upon which the +sympathy of a fellow worker may fall as balm, let me hear it.” + +“So far as I am concerned,” he replied, “I should be glad to tell you. +Speaking about it does me good, and may lead—so I am always in hopes—to +an idea. But, for your own sake, if you take my advice, you will not +press me.” + +“How can it affect me?” I asked, “it is nothing to do with me, is it?” + +“It need have nothing to do with you,” he answered, “if you are sensible +enough to keep out of it. If I tell you: from this time onward it will +be your trouble also. Anyhow, that is what has happened in four other +separate cases. If you like to be the fifth and complete the half dozen +of us, you are welcome. But remember I have warned you.” + +“What has it done to the other five?” I demanded. + +“It has changed them from cheerful, companionable persons into gloomy +one-idead bores,” he told me. “They think of but one thing, they talk of +but one thing, they dream of but one thing. Instead of getting over it, +as time goes on, it takes possession of them more and more. There are +men, of course, who would be unaffected by it—who could shake it off. I +warn you in particular against it, because, in spite of all that is said, +I am convinced you have a sense of humour; and that being so, it will lay +hold of you. It will plague you night and day. You see what it has made +of me! Three months ago a lady interviewer described me as of a sunny +temperament. If you know your own business you will get out at the next +station.” + +I wish now I had followed his advice. As it was, I allowed my curiosity +to take possession of me, and begged him to explain. And he did so. + +“It was just about Christmas time,” he said. “We were discussing the +Drury Lane Pantomime—some three or four of us—in the smoking room of the +Devonshire Club, and young Gold said he thought it would prove a mistake, +the introduction of a subject like the Fiscal question into the story of +Humpty Dumpty. The two things, so far as he could see, had nothing to do +with one another. He added that he entertained a real regard for Mr. Dan +Leno, whom he had once met on a steamboat, but that there were other +topics upon which he would prefer to seek that gentleman’s guidance. +Nettleship, on the other hand, declared that he had no sympathy with the +argument that artists should never intrude upon public affairs. The +actor was a fellow citizen with the rest of us. He said that, whether +one agreed with their conclusions or not, one must admit that the nation +owed a debt of gratitude to Mrs. Brown Potter and to Miss Olga Nethersole +for giving to it the benefit of their convictions. He had talked to both +ladies in private on the subject and was convinced they knew as much +about it as did most people. + +“Burnside, who was one of the party, contended that if sides were to be +taken, a pantomime should surely advocate the Free-Food Cause, seeing it +was a form of entertainment supposed to appeal primarily to the tastes of +the Little Englander. Then I came into the discussion. + +“‘The Fiscal question,’ I said, ‘is on everybody’s tongue. Such being +the case, it is fit and proper it should be referred to in our annual +pantomime, which has come to be regarded as a review of the year’s +doings. But it should not have been dealt with from the political +standpoint. The proper attitude to have assumed towards it was that of +innocent raillery, free from all trace of partisanship.’ + +“Old Johnson had strolled up and was standing behind us. + +“‘The very thing I have been trying to get hold of for weeks,’ he said—‘a +bright, amusing _resumé_ of the whole problem that should give offence to +neither side. You know our paper,’ he continued; ‘we steer clear of +politics, but, at the same time, try to be up-to-date; it is not always +easy. The treatment of the subject, on the lines you suggest, is just +what we require. I do wish you would write me something.’ + +“He is a good old sort, Johnson; it seemed an easy thing. I said I +would. Since that time I have been thinking how to do it. As a matter +of fact, I have not thought of much else. Maybe you can suggest +something.” + +I was feeling in a good working mood the next morning. + +“Pilson,” said I to myself, “shall have the benefit of this. He does not +need anything boisterously funny. A few playfully witty remarks on the +subject will be the ideal.” + +I lit a pipe and sat down to think. At half-past twelve, having to write +some letters before going out to lunch, I dismissed the Fiscal question +from my mind. + +But not for long. It worried me all the afternoon. I thought, maybe, +something would come to me in the evening. I wasted all that evening, +and I wasted all the following morning. Everything has its amusing side, +I told myself. One turns out comic stories about funerals, about +weddings. Hardly a misfortune that can happen to mankind but has +produced its comic literature. An American friend of mine once took a +contract from the Editor of an Insurance Journal to write four humorous +stories; one was to deal with an earthquake, the second with a cyclone, +the third with a flood, and the fourth with a thunderstorm. And more +amusing stories I have never read. What is the matter with the Fiscal +question? + +I myself have written lightly on Bime-metallism. Home Rule we used to be +merry over in the eighties. I remember one delightful evening at the +Codgers’ Hall. It would have been more delightful still, but for a +raw-boned Irishman, who rose towards eleven o’clock and requested to be +informed if any other speaker was wishful to make any more jokes on the +subject of Ould Ireland; because, if so, the raw-boned gentleman was +prepared to save time by waiting and dealing with them altogether. But +if not, then—so the raw-boned gentleman announced—his intention was to go +for the last speaker and the last speaker but two at once and without +further warning. + +No other humourist rising, the raw-boned gentleman proceeded to make good +his threat, with the result that the fun degenerated somewhat. Even on +the Boer War we used to whisper jokes to one another in quiet places. In +this Fiscal question there must be fun. Where is it? + +For days I thought of little else. My laundress—as we call them in the +Temple—noticed my trouble. + +“Mrs. Wilkins,” I confessed, “I am trying to think of something +innocently amusing to say on the Fiscal question.” + +“I’ve ’eard about it,” she said, “but I don’t ’ave much time to read the +papers. They want to make us pay more for our food, don’t they?” + +“For some of it,” I explained. “But, then, we shall pay less for other +things, so that really we shan’t be paying more at all.” + +“There don’t seem much in it, either way,” was Mrs. Wilkins’ opinion. + +“Just so,” I agreed, “that is the advantage of the system. It will cost +nobody anything, and will result in everybody being better off.” + +“The pity is,” said Mrs. Wilkins “that pity nobody ever thought of it +before.” + +“The whole trouble hitherto,” I explained, “has been the foreigner.” + +“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I never ’eard much good of ’em, though they do +say the Almighty ’as a use for almost everything.” + +“These foreigners,” I continued, “these Germans and Americans, they dump +things on us, you know.” + +“What’s that?” demanded Mrs. Wilkins. + +“What’s dump? Well, it’s dumping, you know. You take things, and you +dump them down.” + +“But what things? ’Ow do they do it?” asked Mrs. Wilkins. + +“Why, all sorts of things: pig iron, bacon, door-mats—everything. They +bring them over here—in ships, you understand—and then, if you please, +just dump them down upon our shores.” + +“You don’t mean surely to tell me that they just throw them out and leave +them there?” queried Mrs. Wilkins. + +“Of course not,” I replied; “when I say they dump these things upon our +shores, that is a figure of speech. What I mean is they sell them to +us.” + +“But why do we buy them if we don’t want them?” asked Mrs. Wilkins; +“we’re not bound to buy them, are we?” + +“It is their artfulness,” I explained, “these Germans and Americans, and +the others; they are all just as bad as one another—they insist on +selling us these things at less price than they cost to make.” + +“It seems a bit silly of them, don’t it?” thought Mrs. Wilkins. “I +suppose being foreigners, poor things, they ain’t naturally got much +sense.” + +“It does seem silly of them, if you look at it that way,” I admitted, +“but what we have got to consider is, the injury it is doing us.” + +“Don’t see ’ow it can do us much ’arm,” argued Mrs. Wilkins; “seems a bit +of luck so far as we are concerned. There’s a few more things they’d be +welcome to dump round my way.” + +“I don’t seem to be putting this thing quite in the right light to you, +Mrs. Wilkins,” I confessed. “It is a long argument, and you might not be +able to follow it; but you must take it as a fact now generally admitted +that the cheaper you buy things the sooner your money goes. By allowing +the foreigner to sell us all these things at about half the cost price, +he is getting richer every day, and we are getting poorer. Unless we, as +a country, insist on paying at least twenty per cent. more for everything +we want, it is calculated that in a very few years England won’t have a +penny left.” + +“Sounds a bit topsy turvy,” suggested Mrs. Wilkins. + +“It may sound so,” I answered, “but I fear there can be no doubt of it. +The Board of Trade Returns would seem to prove it conclusively.” + +“Well, God be praised, we’ve found it out in time,” ejaculated Mrs. +Wilkins piously. + +“It is a matter of congratulation,” I agreed; “the difficulty is that a +good many other people say that far from being ruined, we are doing very +well indeed, and are growing richer every year.” + +“But ’ow can they say that,” argued Mrs. Wilkins, “when, as you tell me, +those Trade Returns prove just the opposite?” + +“Well, they say the same, Mrs. Wilkins, that the Board of Trade Returns +prove just the opposite.” + +“Well, they can’t both be right,” said Mrs. Wilkins. + +“You would be surprised, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “how many things can be +proved from Board of Trade Returns!” + +But I have not yet thought of that article for Pilson. + + + + +SHALL WE BE RUINED BY CHINESE CHEAP LABOUR? + + +“WHAT is all this talk I ’ear about the Chinese?” said Mrs. Wilkins to me +the other morning. We generally indulge in a little chat while Mrs. +Wilkins is laying the breakfast-table. Letters and newspapers do not +arrive in my part of the Temple much before nine. From half-past eight +to nine I am rather glad of Mrs. Wilkins. “They ’ave been up to some of +their tricks again, ’aven’t they?” + +“The foreigner, Mrs. Wilkins,” I replied, “whether he be Chinee or any +other he, is always up to tricks. Was not England specially prepared by +an all-wise Providence to frustrate these knavish tricks? Which of such +particular tricks may you be referring to at the moment, Mrs. Wilkins?” + +“Well, ’e’s comin’ over ’ere—isn’t he, sir? to take the work out of our +mouths, as it were.” + +“Well, not exactly over here, to England, Mrs. Wilkins,” I explained. +“He has been introduced into Africa to work in the mines there.” + +“It’s a funny thing,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “but to ’ear the way some of +them talk in our block, you might run away with the notion—that is, if +you didn’t know ’em—that work was their only joy. I said to one of ’em, +the other evening—a man as calls ’isself a brass finisher, though, Lord +knows, the only brass ’e ever finishes is what ’is poor wife earns and +isn’t quick enough to ’ide away from ’im—well, whatever ’appens, I says, +it will be clever of ’em if they take away much work from you. It made +them all laugh, that did,” added Mrs. Wilkins, with a touch of pardonable +pride. + +“Ah,” continued the good lady, “it’s surprising ’ow contented they can be +with a little, some of ’em. Give ’em a ’ard-working woman to look after +them, and a day out once a week with a procession of the unemployed, they +don’t ask for nothing more. There’s that beauty my poor sister Jane was +fool enough to marry. Serves ’er right, as I used to tell ’er at first, +till there didn’t seem any more need to rub it into ’er. She’d ’ad one +good ’usband. It wouldn’t ’ave been fair for ’er to ’ave ’ad another, +even if there’d been a chance of it, seeing the few of ’em there is to go +round among so many. But it’s always the same with us widows: if we +’appen to ’ave been lucky the first time, we put it down to our own +judgment—think we can’t ever make a mistake; and if we draw a wrong ’un, +as the saying is, we argue as if it was the duty of Providence to make it +up to us the second time. Why, I’d a been making a fool of myself three +years ago if ’e ’adn’t been good-natured enough to call one afternoon +when I was out, and ’ook it off with two pounds eight in the best teapot +that I ’ad been soft enough to talk to ’im about: and never let me set +eyes on ’im again. God bless ’im! ’E’s one of the born-tireds, ’e is, +as poor Jane might ’ave seen for ’erself, if she ’ad only looked at ’im, +instead of listening to ’im. + +“But that’s courtship all the world over—old and young alike, so far as +I’ve been able to see it,” was the opinion of Mrs. Wilkins. “The man’s +all eyes and the woman all ears. They don’t seem to ’ave any other +senses left ’em. I ran against ’im the other night, on my way ’ome, at +the corner of Gray’s Inn Road. There was the usual crowd watching a pack +of them Italians laying down the asphalt in ’Olborn, and ’e was among +’em. ’E ’ad secured the only lamp-post, and was leaning agen it. + +“’Ullo,’ I says, ‘glad to see you ’aven’t lost your job. Nothin’ like +stickin’ to it, when you’ve dropped into somethin’ that really suits +you.’ + +“‘What do you mean, Martha?’ ’e says. ’E’s not one of what I call your +smart sort. It takes a bit of sarcasm to get through ’is ’ead. + +“‘Well,’ I says, ‘you’re still on the old track, I see, looking for work. +Take care you don’t ’ave an accident one of these days and run up agen it +before you’ve got time to get out of its way.’ + +“‘It’s these miserable foreigners,’ ’e says. ‘Look at ’em,’ ’e says. + +“‘There’s enough of you doing that,’ I says. ‘I’ve got my room to put +straight and three hours needlework to do before I can get to bed. But +don’t let me ’inder you. You might forget what work was like, if you +didn’t take an opportunity of watching it now and then.’ + +“‘They come over ’ere,’ ’e says, ‘and take the work away from us chaps.’ + +“‘Ah,’ I says, ‘poor things, perhaps they ain’t married.’ + +“‘Lazy devils! ’e says. ‘Look at ’em, smoking cigarettes. I could do +that sort of work. There’s nothing in it. It don’t take ’eathen +foreigners to dab a bit of tar about a road.’ + +“‘Yes,’ I says, ‘you always could do anybody else’s work but your own.’ + +“‘I can’t find it, Martha,’ ’e says. + +“‘No,’ I says, ‘and you never will in the sort of places you go looking +for it. They don’t ’ang it out on lamp-posts, and they don’t leave it +about at the street corners. Go ’ome,’ I says, ‘and turn the mangle for +your poor wife. That’s big enough for you to find, even in the dark.’ + +“Looking for work!” snorted Mrs. Wilkins with contempt; “we women never +’ave much difficulty in finding it, I’ve noticed. There are times when I +feel I could do with losing it for a day.” + +“But what did he reply, Mrs. Wilkins,” I asked; “your brass-finishing +friend, who was holding forth on the subject of Chinese cheap labour.” +Mrs. Wilkins as a conversationalist is not easily kept to the point. I +was curious to know what the working classes were thinking on the +subject. + +“Oh, that,” replied Mrs. Wilkins, “’e did not say nothing. ’E ain’t the +sort that’s got much to say in an argument. ’E belongs to the crowd that +’angs about at the back, and does the shouting. But there was another of +’em, a young fellow as I feels sorry for, with a wife and three small +children, who ’asn’t ’ad much luck for the last six months; and that +through no fault of ’is own, I should say, from the look of ’im. ‘I was +a fool,’ says ’e, ‘when I chucked a good situation and went out to the +war. They told me I was going to fight for equal rights for all white +men. I thought they meant that all of us were going to ’ave a better +chance, and it seemed worth making a bit of sacrifice for, that did. I +should be glad if they would give me a job in their mines that would +enable me to feed my wife and children. That’s all I ask them for!’” + +“It is a difficult problem, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said. “According to the +mine owners—” + +“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins. “They don’t seem to be exactly what you’d call +popular, them mine owners, do they? Daresay they’re not as bad as +they’re painted.” + +“Some people, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “paint them very black. There are +those who hold that the South African mine-owner is not a man at all, but +a kind of pantomime demon. You take Goliath, the whale that swallowed +Jonah, a selection from the least respectable citizens of Sodom and +Gomorrah at their worst, Bluebeard, Bloody Queen Mary, Guy Fawkes, and +the sea-serpent—or, rather, you take the most objectionable attributes of +all these various personages, and mix them up together. The result is +the South African mine-owner, a monster who would willingly promote a +company for the putting on the market of a new meat extract, prepared +exclusively from new-born infants, provided the scheme promised a fair +and reasonable opportunity of fleecing the widow and orphan.” + +“I’ve ’eard they’re a bad lot,” said Mrs. Wilkins. “But we’re most of us +that, if we listen to what other people say about us.” + +“Quite so, Mrs. Wilkins,” I agreed. “One never arrives at the truth by +listening to one side only. On the other hand, for example, there are +those who stoutly maintain that the South African mine-owner is a kind of +spiritual creature, all heart and sentiment, who, against his own will, +has been, so to speak, dumped down upon this earth as the result of +over-production up above of the higher class of archangel. The stock of +archangels of superior finish exceeds the heavenly demand; the surplus +has been dropped down into South Africa and has taken to mine owning. It +is not that these celestial visitors of German sounding nomenclature care +themselves about the gold. Their only desire is, during this earthly +pilgrimage of theirs, to benefit the human race. Nothing can be obtained +in this world without money—” + +“That’s true,” said Mrs. Wilkins, with a sigh. + +“For gold, everything can be obtained. The aim of the mine-owning +archangel is to provide the world with gold. Why should the world +trouble to grow things and make things? ‘Let us,’ say these archangels, +temporarily dwelling in South Africa, ‘dig up and distribute to the world +plenty of gold, then the world can buy whatever it wants, and be happy.’ + +“There may be a flaw in the argument, Mrs. Wilkins,” I allowed. “I am +not presenting it to you as the last word upon the subject. I am merely +quoting the view of the South African mine-owner, feeling himself a much +misunderstood benefactor of mankind.” + +“I expect,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “they are just the ordinary sort of +Christian, like the rest of us, anxious to do the best they can for +themselves, and not too particular as to doing other people in the +process.” + +“I am inclined to think, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “that you are not very +far from the truth. A friend of mine, a year ago, was very bitter on +this subject of Chinese cheap labour. A little later there died a +distant relative of his who left him twenty thousand South African mining +shares. He thinks now that to object to the Chinese is narrow-minded, +illiberal, and against all religious teaching. He has bought an abridged +edition of Confucius, and tells me that there is much that is ennobling +in Chinese morality. Indeed, I gather from him that the introduction of +the Chinese into South Africa will be the saving of that country. The +noble Chinese will afford an object lesson to the poor white man, +displaying to him the virtues of sobriety, thrift, and humility. I also +gather that it will be of inestimable benefit to the noble Chinee +himself. The Christian missionary will get hold of him in bulk, so to +speak, and imbue him with the higher theology. It appears to be one of +those rare cases where everybody is benefited at the expense of nobody. +It is always a pity to let these rare opportunities slip by.” + +“Well,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I’ve nothin’ to say agen the Chinaman, as a +Chinaman. As to ’is being a ’eathen, well, throwin’ stones at a church, +as the sayin’ is, don’t make a Christian of you. There’s Christians I’ve +met as couldn’t do themselves much ’arm by changing their religion; and +as to cleanliness, well, I’ve never met but one, and ’e was a +washerwoman, and I’d rather ’ave sat next to ’im in a third-class +carriage on a Bank ’Oliday than next to some of ’em. + +“Seems to me,” continued Mrs. Wilkins, “we’ve got into the ’abit of +talkin’ a bit too much about other people’s dirt. The London atmosphere +ain’t nat’rally a dry-cleanin’ process in itself, but there’s a goodish +few as seem to think it is. One comes across Freeborn Britons ’ere and +there as I’d be sorry to scrub clean for a shillin’ and find my own +soap.” + +“It is a universal failing, Mrs. Wilkins,” I explained. “If you talk to +a travelled Frenchman, he contrasts to his own satisfaction the Paris +_ouvrier_ in his blue blouse with the appearance of the London labourer.” + +“I daresay they’re all right according to their lights,” said Mrs. +Wilkins, “but it does seem a bit wrong that if our own chaps are willin’ +and anxious to work, after all they’ve done, too, in the way of getting +the mines for us, they shouldn’t be allowed the job.” + +“Again, Mrs. Wilkins, it is difficult to arrive at a just conclusion,” I +said. “The mine-owner, according to his enemies, hates the British +workman with the natural instinct that evil creatures feel towards the +noble and virtuous. He will go to trouble and expense merely to spite +the British workman, to keep him out of South Africa. According to his +friends, the mine-owner sets his face against the idea of white labour +for two reasons. First and foremost, it is not nice work; the mine-owner +hates the thought of his beloved white brother toiling in the mines. It +is not right that the noble white man should demean himself by such work. +Secondly, white labour is too expensive. If for digging gold men had to +be paid anything like the same prices they are paid for digging coal, the +mines could not be worked. The world would lose the gold that the +mine-owner is anxious to bestow upon it. + +“The mine-owner, following his own inclinations, would take a little +farm, grow potatoes, and live a beautiful life—perhaps write a little +poetry. A slave to sense of duty, he is chained to the philanthropic +work of gold-mining. If we hamper him and worry him the danger is that +he will get angry with us—possibly he will order his fiery chariot and +return to where he came from.” + +“Well, ’e can’t take the gold with him, wherever ’e goes to?” argued Mrs. +Wilkins. + +“You talk, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “as if the gold were of more value to +the world than is the mine-owner.” + +“Well, isn’t it?” demanded Mrs. Wilkins. + +“It’s a new idea, Mrs. Wilkins,” I answered; “it wants thinking out.” + + + + +HOW TO SOLVE THE SERVANT PROBLEM. + + +“I AM glad to see, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “that the Women’s Domestic +Guild of America has succeeded in solving the servant girl problem—none +too soon, one might almost say.” + +“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, as she took the cover off the bacon and gave an +extra polish to the mustard-pot with her apron, “they are clever people +over there; leastways, so I’ve always ’eard.” + +“This, their latest, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “I am inclined to regard as +their greatest triumph. My hope is that the Women’s Domestic Guild of +America, when it has finished with the United States and Canada, will, +perhaps, see its way to establishing a branch in England. There are +ladies of my acquaintance who would welcome, I feel sure, any really +satisfactory solution of the problem.” + +“Well, good luck to it, is all I say,” responded Mrs. Wilkins, “and if it +makes all the gals contented with their places, and all the mistresses +satisfied with what they’ve got and ’appy in their minds, why, God bless +it, say I.” + +“The mistake hitherto,” I said, “from what I read, appears to have been +that the right servant was not sent to the right place. What the Women’s +Domestic Guild of America proposes to do is to find the right servant for +the right place. You see the difference, don’t you, Mrs. Wilkins?” + +“That’s the secret,” agreed Mrs. Wilkins. “They don’t anticipate any +difficulty in getting the right sort of gal, I take it?” + +“I gather not, Mrs. Wilkins,” I replied. + +Mrs. Wilkins is of a pessimistic turn of mind. + +“I am not so sure about it,” she said; “the Almighty don’t seem to ’ave +made too many of that sort. Unless these American ladies that you speak +of are going to start a factory of their own. I am afraid there is +disappointment in store for them.” + +“Don’t throw cold water on the idea before it is fairly started, Mrs. +Wilkins,” I pleaded. + +“Well, sir,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I ’ave been a gal myself in service; and +in my time I‘ve ’ad a few mistresses of my own, and I’ve ’eard a good +deal about others. There are ladies and ladies, as you may know, sir, +and some of them, if they aren’t exactly angels, are about as near to it +as can be looked for in this climate, and they are not the ones that do +most of the complaining. But, as for the average mistress—well it ain’t +a gal she wants, it’s a plaster image, without any natural innards—a sort +of thing as ain’t ’uman, and ain’t to be found in ’uman nature. And then +she’d grumble at it, if it didn’t ’appen to be able to be in two places +at once.” + +“You fear that the standard for that ‘right girl’ is likely to be set a +trifle too high Mrs. Wilkins,” I suggested. + +“That ‘right gal,’ according to the notions of some of ’em,” retorted +Mrs. Wilkins, “’er place ain’t down ’ere among us mere mortals; ’er place +is up in ’eaven with a ’arp and a golden crown. There’s my niece, Emma, +I don’t say she is a saint, but a better ’earted, ’arder working gal, at +twenty pounds a year, you don’t expect to find, unless maybe you’re a +natural born fool that can’t ’elp yourself. She wanted a place. She ’ad +been ’ome for nearly six months, nursing ’er old father, as ’ad been down +all the winter with rheumatic fever; and ’ard-put to it she was for a few +clothes. You ’ear ’em talk about gals as insists on an hour a day for +practising the piano, and the right to invite their young man to spend +the evening with them in the drawing-room. Perhaps it is meant to be +funny; I ain’t come across that type of gal myself, outside the pictures +in the comic papers; and I’ll never believe, till I see ’er myself, that +anybody else ’as. They sent ’er from the registry office to a lady at +Clapton. + +“‘I ’ope you are good at getting up early in the morning?’ says the lady, +‘I like a gal as rises cheerfully to ’er work.’ + +“‘Well, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘I can’t say as I’ve got a passion for it. +But it’s one of those things that ’as to be done, and I guess I’ve learnt +the trick.’ + +“‘I’m a great believer in early rising,’ says my lady; ‘in the morning, +one is always fresher for one’s work; my ’usband and the younger children +breakfast at ’arf past seven; myself and my eldest daughter ’ave our +breakfest in bed at eight.’ + +“‘That’ll be all right, ma’am,’ says Emma. + +“‘And I ’ope,’ says the lady, ‘you are of an amiable disposition. Some +gals when you ring the bell come up looking so disagreeable, one almost +wishes one didn’t want them.’ + +“‘Well, it ain’t a thing,’ explains Emma, ‘as makes you want to burst out +laughing, ’earing the bell go off for the twentieth time, and ’aving +suddenly to put down your work at, perhaps, a critical moment. Some +ladies don’t seem able to reach down their ’at for themselves.’ + +“‘I ’ope you are not impertinent,’ says the lady; ‘if there’s one thing +that I object to in a servant it is impertinence.’ + +“‘We none of us like being answered back,’ says Emma, ‘more particularly +when we are in the wrong. But I know my place ma’am, and I shan’t give +you no lip. It always leads to less trouble, I find, keeping your mouth +shut, rather than opening it.’ + +“‘Are you fond of children,’ asks my lady. + +“‘It depends upon the children,’ says Emma; ‘there are some I ’ave ’ad to +do with as made the day seem pleasanter, and I’ve come across others as I +could ’ave parted from at any moment without tears.’ + +“‘I like a gal,’ says the lady, ‘who is naturally fond of children, it +shows a good character.’ + +“‘How many of them are there?’ says Emma. + +“‘Four of them,’ answers my lady, ‘but you won’t ’ave much to do except +with the two youngest. The great thing with young children is to +surround them with good examples. Are you a Christian?’ asks my lady. + +“‘That’s what I’m generally called,’ says Emma. + +“‘Every other Sunday evening out is my rule,’ says the lady, ‘but of +course I shall expect you to go to church.’ + +“‘Do you mean in my time, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘or in yours.’ + +“‘I mean on your evening of course,’ says my lady. ‘’Ow else could you +go?’ + +“‘Well, ma’am,’ says Emma, ‘I like to see my people now and then.’ + +“‘There are better things,’ says my lady, ‘than seeing what you call your +people, and I should not care to take a girl into my ’ouse as put ’er +pleasure before ’er religion. You are not engaged, I ’ope?’ + +“‘Walking out, ma’am, do you mean?’ says Emma. ‘No, ma’am, there is +nobody I’ve got in my mind—not just at present.’ + +“‘I never will take a gal,’ explains my lady, ‘who is engaged. I find it +distracts ’er attention from ’er work. And I must insist if you come to +me,’ continues my lady, ‘that you get yourself another ’at and jacket. +If there is one thing I object to in a servant it is a disposition to +cheap finery.’ + +“’Er own daughter was sitting there beside ’er with ’alf a dozen silver +bangles on ’er wrist, and a sort of thing ’anging around ’er neck, as, +’ad it been real, would ’ave been worth perhaps a thousand pounds. But +Emma wanted a job, so she kept ’er thoughts to ’erself. + +“‘I can put these things by and get myself something else,’ she says, ‘if +you don’t mind, ma’am, advancing me something out of my first three +months’ wages. I’m afraid my account at the bank is a bit overdrawn.’ + +“The lady whispered something to ’er daughter. ‘I am afraid, on thinking +it over,’ she says, ‘that you won’t suit, after all. You don’t look +serious enough. I feel sure, from the way you do your ’air,’ says my +lady, ‘there’s a frivolous side to your nature.’ + +“So Emma came away, and was not, on the whole, too sorry.” + +“But do they get servants to come to them, this type of mistress, do you +think, Mrs. Wilkins?” I asked. + +“They get them all right,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “and if it’s a decent gal, +it makes a bad gal of ’er, that ever afterwards looks upon every mistress +as ’er enemy, and acts accordingly. And if she ain’t a naturally good +gal, it makes ’er worse, and then you ’ear what awful things gals are. I +don’t say it’s an easy problem,” continued Mrs. Wilkins, “it’s just like +marriages. The good mistress gets ’old of the bad servant, and the bad +mistress, as often as not is lucky.” + +“But how is it,” I argued, “that in hotels, for instance, the service is +excellent, and the girls, generally speaking, seem contented? The work +is hard, and the wages not much better, if as good.” + +“Ah,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “you ’ave ’it the right nail on the ’ead, there, +sir. They go into the ’otels and work like niggers, knowing that if a +single thing goes wrong they will be bully-ragged and sworn at till they +don’t know whether they are standing on their ’ead or their ’eels. But +they ’ave their hours; the gal knows when ’er work is done, and when the +clock strikes she is a ’uman being once again. She ’as got that moment +to look forward to all day, and it keeps ’er going. In private service +there’s no moment in the day to ’ope for. If the lady is reasonable she +ain’t overworked; but no ’ow can she ever feel she is her own mistress, +free to come and go, to wear ’er bit of finery, to ’ave ’er bit of fun. +She works from six in the morning till eleven or twelve at night, and +then she only goes to bed provided she ain’t wanted. She don’t belong to +’erself at all; it’s that that irritates them.” + +“I see your point, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said, “and, of course, in a house +where two or three servants were kept some such plan might easily be +arranged. The girl who commenced work at six o’clock in the morning +might consider herself free at six o’clock in the evening. What she did +with herself, how she dressed herself in her own time, would be her +affair. What church the clerk or the workman belongs to, what company he +keeps, is no concern of the firm. In such matters, mistresses, I am +inclined to think, saddle themselves with a responsibility for which +there is no need. If the girl behaves herself while in the house, and +does her work, there the contract ends. The mistress who thinks it her +duty to combine the _rôles_ of employer and of maiden aunt is naturally +resented. The next month the girl might change her hours from twelve to +twelve, and her fellow-servant could enjoy the six a.m. to six p.m. +shift. But how do you propose to deal, Mrs. Wilkins, with the smaller +_menage_, that employs only one servant?” + +“Well, sir,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “it seems to me simple enough. Ladies +talk pretty about the dignity of labour, and are never tired of pointing +out why gals should prefer domestic service to all other kinds of work. +Suppose they practise what they preach. In the ’ouse, where there’s only +the master and the mistress, and, say a couple of small children, let the +lady take her turn. After all, it’s only her duty, same as the office or +the shop is the man’s. Where, on the other ’and, there are biggish boys +and gals about the place, well it wouldn’t do them any ’arm to be taught +to play a little less, and to look after themselves a little more. It’s +just arranging things—that’s all that’s wanted.” + +“You remind me of a family I once knew, Mrs. Wilkins,” I said; “it +consisted of the usual father and mother, and of five sad, healthy girls. +They kept two servants—or, rather, they never kept any servants; they +lived always looking for servants, breaking their hearts over servants, +packing servants off at a moment’s notice, standing disconsolately +looking after servants who had packed themselves off at a moment’s +notice, wondering generally what the world was coming too. It occurred +to me at the time, that without much trouble, they could have lived a +peaceful life without servants. The eldest girl was learning +painting—and seemed unable to learn anything else. It was poor sort of +painting; she noticed it herself. But she seemed to think that, if she +talked a lot about it, and thought of nothing else, that somehow it would +all come right. The second girl played the violin. She played it from +early morning till late evening, and friends fell away from them. There +wasn’t a spark of talent in the family, but they all had a notion that a +vague longing to be admired was just the same as genius. + +“Another daughter fancied she would like to be an actress, and screamed +all day in the attic. The fourth wrote poetry on a typewriter, and +wondered why nobody seemed to want it; while the fifth one suffered from +a weird belief that smearing wood with a red-hot sort of poker was a +thing worth doing for its own sake. All of them seemed willing enough to +work, provided only that it was work of no use to any living soul. With +a little sense, and the occasional assistance of a charwoman, they could +have led a merrier life.” + +“If I was giving away secrets,” said Mrs. Wilkins, “I’d say to the +mistresses: ‘Show yourselves able to be independent.’ It’s because the +gals know that the mistresses can’t do without them that they sometimes +gives themselves airs.” + + + + +WHY WE HATE THE FOREIGNER. + + +The advantage that the foreigner possesses over the Englishman is that he +is born good. He does not have to try to be good, as we do. He does not +have to start the New Year with the resolution to be good, and succeed, +bar accidents, in being so till the middle of January. He is just good +all the year round. When a foreigner is told to mount or descend from a +tram on the near side, it does not occur to him that it would be humanly +possible to secure egress from or ingress to that tram from the off side. + +In Brussels once I witnessed a daring attempt by a lawless foreigner to +enter a tram from the wrong side. The gate was open: he was standing +close beside it. A line of traffic was in his way: to have got round to +the right side of that tram would have meant missing it. He entered when +the conductor was not looking, and took his seat. The astonishment of +the conductor on finding him there was immense. How did he get there? +The conductor had been watching the proper entrance, and the man had not +passed him. Later, the true explanation suggested itself to the +conductor, but for a while he hesitated to accuse a fellow human being of +such crime. + +He appealed to the passenger himself. Was his presence to be accounted +for by miracle or by sin? The passenger confessed. It was more in +sorrow than in anger that the conductor requested him at once to leave. +This tram was going to be kept respectable. The passenger proved +refractory, a halt was called, and the gendarmerie appealed to. After +the manner of policemen, they sprang, as it were, from the ground, and +formed up behind an imposing officer, whom I took to be the sergeant. At +first the sergeant could hardly believe the conductor’s statement. Even +then, had the passenger asserted that he had entered by the proper +entrance, his word would have been taken. Much easier to the foreign +official mind would it have been to believe that the conductor had been +stricken with temporary blindness, than that man born of woman would have +deliberately done anything expressly forbidden by a printed notice. + +Myself, in his case, I should have lied and got the trouble over. But he +was a proud man, or had not much sense—one of the two, and so held fast +to the truth. It was pointed out to him that he must descend immediately +and wait for the next tram. Other gendarmes were arriving from every +quarter: resistance in the circumstances seemed hopeless. He said he +would get down. He made to descend this time by the proper gate, but +that was not justice. He had mounted the wrong side, he must alight on +the wrong side. Accordingly, he was put out amongst the traffic, after +which the conductor preached a sermon from the centre of the tram on the +danger of ascents and descents conducted from the wrong quarter. + +There is a law throughout Germany—an excellent law it is: I would we had +it in England—that nobody may scatter paper about the street. An English +military friend told me that, one day in Dresden, unacquainted with this +rule, he tore a long letter he had been reading into some fifty fragments +and threw them behind him. A policeman stopped him and explained to him +quite politely the law upon the subject. My military friend agreed that +it was a very good law, thanked the man for his information, and said +that for the future he would bear it in mind. That, as the policeman +pointed out, would make things right enough for the future, but meanwhile +it was necessary to deal with the past—with the fifty or so pieces of +paper lying scattered about the road and pavement. + +My military friend, with a pleasant laugh, confessed he did not see what +was to be done. The policeman, more imaginative, saw a way out. It was +that my military friend should set to work and pick up those fifty scraps +of paper. He is an English General on the Retired List, and of imposing +appearance: his manner on occasion is haughty. He did not see himself on +his hands and knees in the chief street of Dresden, in the middle of the +afternoon, picking up paper. + +The German policeman himself admitted that the situation was awkward. If +the English General could not accept it there happened to be an +alternative. It was that the English General should accompany the +policeman through the streets, followed by the usual crowd, to the +nearest prison, some three miles off. It being now four o’clock in the +afternoon, they would probably find the judge departed. But the most +comfortable thing possible in prison cells should be allotted to him, and +the policeman had little doubt that the General, having paid his fine of +forty marks, would find himself a free man again in time for lunch the +following day. The general suggested hiring a boy to pick up the paper. +The policeman referred to the wording of the law, and found that this +would not be permitted. + +“I thought the matter out,” my friend told me, “imagining all the +possible alternatives, including that of knocking the fellow down and +making a bolt, and came to the conclusion that his first suggestion +would, on the whole, result in the least discomfort. But I had no idea +that picking up small scraps of thin paper off greasy stones was the +business that I found it! It took me nearly ten minutes, and afforded +amusement, I calculate, to over a thousand people. But it is a good law, +mind you: all I wish is that I had known it beforehand.” + +On one occasion I accompanied an American lady to a German Opera House. +The taking-off of hats in the German Schausspielhaus is obligatory, and +again I would it were so in England. But the American lady is accustomed +to disregard rules made by mere man. She explained to the doorkeeper +that she was going to wear her hat. He, on his side, explained to her +that she was not: they were both a bit short with one another. I took +the opportunity to turn aside and buy a programme: the fewer people there +are mixed up in an argument, I always think, the better. + +My companion explained quite frankly to the doorkeeper that it did not +matter what he said, she was not going to take any notice of him. He did +not look a talkative man at any time, and, maybe, this announcement +further discouraged him. In any case, he made no attempt to answer. All +he did was to stand in the centre of the doorway with a far-away look in +his eyes. The doorway was some four feet wide: he was about three feet +six across, and weighed about twenty stone. As I explained, I was busy +buying a programme, and when I returned my friend had her hat in her +hand, and was digging pins into it: I think she was trying to make +believe it was the heart of the doorkeeper. She did not want to listen +to the opera, she wanted to talk all the time about that doorkeeper, but +the people round us would not even let her do that. + +She has spent three winters in Germany since then. Now when she feels +like passing through a door that is standing wide open just in front of +her, and which leads to just the place she wants to get to, and an +official shakes his head at her, and explains that she must not, but must +go up two flights of stairs and along a corridor and down another flight +of stairs, and so get to her place that way, she apologises for her error +and trots off looking ashamed of herself. + +Continental Governments have trained their citizens to perfection. +Obedience is the Continent’s first law. The story that is told of a +Spanish king who was nearly drowned because the particular official whose +duty it was to dive in after Spanish kings when they tumbled out of boats +happened to be dead, and his successor had not yet been appointed, I can +quite believe. On the Continental railways if you ride second class with +a first-class ticket you render yourself liable to imprisonment. What +the penalty is for riding first with a second-class ticket I cannot +say—probably death, though a friend of mine came very near on one +occasion to finding out. + +All would have gone well with him if he had not been so darned honest. +He is one of those men who pride themselves on being honest. I believe +he takes a positive pleasure in being honest. He had purchased a +second-class ticket for a station up a mountain, but meeting, by chance +on the platform, a lady acquaintance, had gone with her into a +first-class apartment. On arriving at the journey’s end he explained to +the collector what he had done, and, with his purse in his hand, demanded +to know the difference. They took him into a room and locked the door. +They wrote out his confession and read it over to him, and made him sign +it, and then they sent for a policeman. + +The policeman cross-examined him for about a quarter of an hour. They +did not believe the story about the lady. Where was the lady? He did +not know. They searched the neighbourhood for her, but could not find +her. He suggested—what turned out to be the truth—that, tired of +loitering about the station, she had gone up the mountain. An Anarchist +outrage had occurred in the neighbouring town some months before. The +policeman suggested searching for bombs. Fortunately, a Cook’s agent, +returning with a party of tourists, arrived upon the scene, and took it +upon himself to explain in delicate language that my friend was a bit of +an ass and could not tell first class from second. It was the red +cushions that had deceived my friend: he thought it was first class, as a +matter of fact it was second class. + +Everybody breathed again. The confession was torn up amid universal joy: +and then the fool of a ticket collector wanted to know about the lady—who +must have travelled in a second-class compartment with a first-class +ticket. It looked as if a bad time were in store for her on her return +to the station. + +But the admirable representative of Cook was again equal to the occasion. +He explained that my friend was also a bit of a liar. When he said he +had travelled with this lady he was merely boasting. He would like to +have travelled with her, that was all he meant, only his German was +shaky. Joy once more entered upon the scene. My friend’s character +appeared to be re-established. He was not the abandoned wretch for whom +they had taken him—only, apparently, a wandering idiot. Such an one the +German official could respect. At the expense of such an one the German +official even consented to drink beer. + +Not only the foreign man, woman and child, but the foreign dog is born +good. In England, if you happen to be the possessor of a dog, much of +your time is taken up dragging him out of fights, quarrelling with the +possessor of the other dog as to which began it, explaining to irate +elderly ladies that he did not kill the cat, that the cat must have died +of heart disease while running across the road, assuring disbelieving +game-keepers that he is not your dog, that you have not the faintest +notion whose dog he is. With the foreign dog, life is a peaceful +proceeding. When the foreign dog sees a row, tears spring to his eyes: +he hastens on and tries to find a policeman. When the foreign dog sees a +cat in a hurry, he stands aside to allow her to pass. They dress the +foreign dog—some of them—in a little coat, with a pocket for his +handkerchief, and put shoes on his feet. They have not given him a +hat—not yet. When they do, he will contrive by some means or another to +raise it politely when he meets a cat he thinks he knows. + +One morning, in a Continental city, I came across a disturbance—it might +be more correct to say the disturbance came across me: it swept down upon +me, enveloped me before I knew that I was in it. A fox-terrier it was, +belonging to a very young lady—it was when the disturbance was to a +certain extent over that we discovered he belonged to this young lady. +She arrived towards the end of the disturbance, very much out of breath: +she had been running for a mile, poor girl, and shouting most of the way. +When she looked round and saw all the things that had happened, and had +had other things that she had missed explained to her, she burst into +tears. An English owner of that fox-terrier would have given one look +round and then have jumped upon the nearest tram going anywhere. But, as +I have said, the foreigner is born good. I left her giving her name and +address to seven different people. + +But it was about the dog I wished to speak more particularly. He had +commenced innocently enough, trying to catch a sparrow. Nothing delights +a sparrow more than being chased by a dog. A dozen times he thought he +had the sparrow. Then another dog had got in his way. I don’t know what +they call this breed of dog, but abroad it is popular: it has no tail and +looks like a pig—when things are going well with it. This particular +specimen, when I saw him, looked more like part of a doormat. The +fox-terrier had seized it by the scruff of the neck and had rolled it +over into the gutter just in front of a motor cycle. Its owner, a large +lady, had darted out to save it, and had collided with the motor cyclist. +The large lady had been thrown some half a dozen yards against an Italian +boy carrying a tray load of plaster images. + +I have seen a good deal of trouble in my life, but never one yet that did +not have an Italian image-vendor somehow or other mixed up in it. Where +these boys hide in times of peace is a mystery. The chance of being +upset brings them out as sunshine brings out flies. The motor cycle had +dashed into a little milk-cart and had spread it out neatly in the middle +of the tram lines. The tram traffic looked like being stopped for a +quarter of an hour; but the idea of every approaching tram driver +appeared to be that if he rang his bell with sufficient vigor this +seeming obstruction would fade away and disappear. + +In an English town all this would not have attracted much attention. +Somebody would have explained that a dog was the original cause, and the +whole series of events would have appeared ordinary and natural. Upon +these foreigners the fear descended that the Almighty, for some reason, +was angry with them. A policeman ran to catch the dog. + +The delighted dog rushed backwards, barking furiously, and tried to throw +up paving stones with its hind legs. That frightened a nursemaid who was +wheeling a perambulator, and then it was that I entered into the +proceedings. Seated on the edge of the pavement, with a perambulator on +one side of me and a howling baby on the other, I told that dog what I +thought of him. + +Forgetful that I was in a foreign land—that he might not understand me—I +told it him in English, I told it him at length, I told it very loud and +clear. He stood a yard in front of me, listening to me with an +expression of ecstatic joy I have never before or since seen equalled on +any face, human or canine. He drank it in as though it had been music +from Paradise. + +“Where have I heard that song before?” he seemed to be saying to himself, +“the old familiar language they used to talk to me when I was young?” + +He approached nearer to me; there were almost tears in his eyes when I +had finished. + +“Say it again!” he seemed to be asking of me. “Oh! say it all over +again, the dear old English oaths and curses that in this God-forsaken +land I never hoped to hear again.” + +I learnt from the young lady that he was an English-born fox-terrier. +That explained everything. The foreign dog does not do this sort of +thing. The foreigner is born good: that is why we hate him. + + + + +***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IDLE IDEAS IN 1905*** + + +******* This file should be named 3140-0.txt or 3140-0.zip ******* + + +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/1/4/3140 + + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at + www.gutenberg.org/license. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 +North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email +contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the +Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
