summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/29639-8.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '29639-8.txt')
-rw-r--r--29639-8.txt2099
1 files changed, 2099 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/29639-8.txt b/29639-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..07801a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29639-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2099 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Is civilization a disease?, by Stanton Coit
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Is civilization a disease?
+
+Author: Stanton Coit
+
+Release Date: August 8, 2009 [EBook #29639]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IS CIVILIZATION A DISEASE? ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
+generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian
+Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Barbara Weinstock Lectures on The Morals of Trade
+
+IS CIVILIZATION A DISEASE? By STANTON COIT.
+
+SOCIAL JUSTICE WITHOUT SOCIALISM. By JOHN BATES CLARK.
+
+THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PRIVATE MONOPOLY AND GOOD CITIZENSHIP. By
+JOHN GRAHAM BROOKS.
+
+COMMERCIALISM AND JOURNALISM. By HAMILTON HOLT.
+
+THE BUSINESS CAREER IN ITS PUBLIC RELATIONS. By ALBERT SHAW.
+
+
+
+
+IS CIVILIZATION A DISEASE?
+
+
+
+By
+
+STANTON COIT
+
+
+
+BOSTON AND NEW YORK
+HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
+The Riverside Press Cambridge
+1917
+
+COPYRIGHT, 1917, BY THE REGENTS OF THE
+UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
+
+ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
+
+_Published May 1917_
+
+
+
+
+BARBARA WEINSTOCK
+LECTURES ON THE MORALS OF TRADE
+
+
+This series will contain essays by representative scholars and men of
+affairs dealing with the various phases of the moral law in its bearing
+on business life under the new economic order, first delivered at the
+University of California on the Weinstock foundation.
+
+
+
+
+IS CIVILIZATION A DISEASE?
+
+
+
+
+I. TRADE TYPICAL OF CIVILIZATION
+
+
+In choosing "The Morals of Trade" as the general title of the Weinstock
+Lectureship, I am informed that its founder meant the word "Trade" to
+be understood in its comprehensive sense, as commensurate with our
+whole system of socialized wealth--at least, upon the present occasion
+I shall interpret it in this broad way.
+
+
+I shall furthermore ask you to consider our system of socialized
+wealth--its practice and principles--in relation to the whole of that
+vast artificial structure of human life which is labelled
+"Civilization," and which began to prevail some ten thousand years ago.
+Such a comprehensive sweep of vision is, in my judgment, necessary if
+we are to view trade in true human perspective; nor can we estimate the
+degree of praise or blame we ought to confer upon it until we have
+determined the worth of civilization itself. For trade is not only
+bound up inextricably with the whole of our social order, but, as it
+seems to me, manifests in a most acute form the universal character of
+civilization in general. We must therefore discover the structural
+principle which began to co-ordinate the lives of any group of human
+beings when their tribe finally passed out of barbarism. Having
+discovered this, we shall be able to judge whether by its
+ever-advancing application to the life of men, and its ever-increasing
+domination over their wills, it has furthered the cause of ideal
+humanity or not. If we find that it has been essentially humane, we
+shall have arrived at the conclusion that its offspring, trade, is
+moral. If, however, we unearth in the very principle of historic
+civilization something radically wrong, anti-human and inhuman, and if
+we can discover another co-ordinating principle which is humane and
+feasible, civilization will then be seen to be a thing to be
+"superseded"--as Nietzsche thought man himself was--and trade, its
+latest and lustiest issue, will be felt to be a usurper deserving to be
+disinherited in favor of some true economic child of the "Holy Spirit
+of Man."
+
+
+
+
+II. IS CIVILIZATION JUST?
+
+
+In order to open such lines of anthropological investigation and
+ethical reflection, I have raised the question: "Is Civilization a
+Disease?"
+
+Had I asked, "Is Civilization Christian?" I should have defeated my own
+end. You would have answered "No" as soon as you saw the subject of my
+discourse announced, and would have stayed at home. But you might still
+have given your ethical sanction to trade. You might have said, "It
+does not pretend to be Christian; but that is nothing against it, for
+the vital principle of Christianity is sentimental and impracticable:
+and what won't work can't be right."
+
+Had I raised the question in the form, "Could trade ever have emanated
+from an intelligent motive of universal love--of deference for the
+humanity in every man?" you would have replied, "Never!" But you might
+have consoled yourself with the thought that it is only a small part of
+our boasted civilization. We have art and education and family life and
+monogamy and religion; and these come in as correctives, so that trade,
+although not conceived of benevolence and not bearing the stamp of
+humanity in its character, is comparatively harmless under the
+restraints laid upon it. Then, too, the idea of universal love savors
+of theology, and would have put my lecture under that general ban which
+in philosophical circles has been set up against theological ethics.
+
+Indeed, I even shrank from asking, "Is civilization unethical, or
+wrong, or bad?" For nowadays we find moral judgments more attractive
+when they are disguised or at least slightly veiled. When we are really
+curious to know what is good, we become shy; we are not sure that our
+neighbors may not put a cynical interpretation upon any appearance of
+enthusiasm in our effort to find out what is right. Anticipating such
+delicacy in my prospective audience of to-night, I threw a
+physiological drapery, not to say pathological, over the ethical
+bareness of my theme, by introducing into it the idea of disease. For
+while it may no longer be a stigma to be un-Christian, and while some
+have been trying to break all the traditional tables of moral values
+and prevent any new ones from being inscribed, nobody, so far as I have
+been able to learn, has denied that disease, whether physical or only
+mental, is an evil and a thing which it would be wicked to spread for
+the mere delight in spreading it. Happily, there is still astir
+throughout the community an active, virile, and unashamed desire--and
+not only among women--for health. And in alertness and resourcefulness
+it is second only to the desire for wealth itself. The result is, that
+if anything which we have admired and been proud of has been discovered
+by experts to be of the nature of disease, we want to be notified, so
+that we may reverse our sentiments towards it, and if possible destroy
+it. The word "disease" is still plainly one of reproach.
+
+On the other hand, the very term "civilization" sets emotions vibrating
+of deference and awe towards the institution it signifies. Indeed,
+pride in being civilized is still so nearly universal--especially among
+Americans--that many persons upon hearing the point mooted whether
+civilization be a disease or not, are disposed to resent the bare
+suggestion as smacking of whimsicality.
+
+
+
+
+III. A METAPHORICAL USE OF THE WORD "DISEASE"
+
+
+I, therefore, hasten to hide myself thus early in my discourse behind
+the man, bigger than I, who many years ago first aroused this question
+in my mind, a question which, having once fastened itself upon the
+soul, may allow one no rest and may prevent one from ever again going
+on gayly through life singing with Browning's _Pippa_:--
+
+ God's in His Heaven--
+ All's right with the world.
+
+It is now twenty-six years since I first read Mr. Edward Carpenter's
+penetrating essay, then but recently published, entitled _Civilization:
+Its Cause and Cure_. The very name of the book made one ask: "Is
+civilization then a disease?" And if one deigned, as I did, to read
+the essay carefully, one found the author defending the affirmative
+in all seriousness and with much thoroughness, and displaying acute
+analytical power throughout his argument. The charge of whimsicality
+could not hold against him. The author showed an adequate insight into
+the social structure which is called civilization. What was equally
+essential, his knowledge of the latest speculations as to the nature
+of disease,--theories which have not yet been superseded and which
+when applied by Sir Almroth Wright proved to be most fruitful working
+hypotheses,--Carpenter's knowledge of these was comprehensive and
+discriminating. He accordingly never pressed the analogy between
+civilization and disease unduly--he knew that it could not be made to
+fit all particulars. And he never fell into any confusion of thought;
+he easily avoided being caught in his own metaphor. He employed it only
+within limits and only when it rendered the moral issue more concrete
+and vivid. Because he had a scientific knowledge both of civilization
+and of disease, he could safely use language which appealed to the
+moral emotions as an aid to our moral judgment.
+
+Indeed, Mr. Carpenter showed himself not only scientific in his ethics,
+but what is much rarer in these days, ethical in his science. For it is
+questionable whether one can ever arrive at any moral judgment except
+there be a deep and strong emotional accompaniment to one's rational
+investigation. If we do not take sides with humanity at the outset, if
+we eliminate all preference for certain kinds of conduct and goals of
+pursuit which grew up in the human mind before we began our scientific
+criticism of morals, how shall we ever get back again into the sphere
+of distinctively ethical judgment? For instance, how could we strike
+out from the field of observation the something which we count the
+moral factor in life, and then proceed to investigate the morals of
+trade? Evidently we must in every ethical enquiry start by taking sides
+with that trend of the Race-Will in us, which moves plainly towards an
+ever-increasing self-knowledge, self-reverence and self-control on the
+part of man. For it is this race-will in us whereby we have the
+capacity and interest to call any line of conduct or any disposition of
+the mind good or bad, right or wrong.
+
+
+
+
+IV. OUTLINE OF MY ARGUMENT
+
+
+Nor do I simply mean that we must show loyalty to life as opposed to
+death, or to health as against disease. It is more than that. The
+lifeward effort of some beings clashes with the corresponding attempt
+to live on the part of others, and the actualization of one impersonal
+ideal of beauty, truth, or society exacts the sacrifice of one set of
+human lives and favors the survival of another, so that an opposition
+in ideals may mean an antagonism in the struggle of classes and masses
+of men for existence. There is a combat, and we are called upon to
+choose which side to encourage and support. One and the same state of
+things often spells disease and death to the one party and life and
+health to the other. I shall be able on this account to show that
+whether civilization appears to us as a disease or not depends upon
+what sort of a person we are, and to which side we are constitutionally
+disposed to attach ourselves. To show this, I will first draw an
+analogy on the biological plane and then I will cite the judgment of
+great humanists who have sided against civilization. After that, I will
+submit instances in civilization itself for your own judgment. Only
+then shall I return to Edward Carpenter, to give a _résumé_ of his
+position, and to point out how far and why I agree with him, and at
+what stage I part company with him and for what reasons. Then I shall
+attempt to present a bird's-eye view of the steps in human advancement
+towards civilization as the best anthropologists have traced them.
+Thus, we shall be able to see our historic social order in right
+relation to that ideal humanity which our own spiritual constitution
+projects prophetically above the threshold of our consciousness. Then,
+if ever, we shall be in a state of mind to judge whether the thing
+which civilization has begotten after its own kind and named "trade" is
+good or bad.
+
+
+
+
+V. MAN _VERSUS_ CIVILIZATION
+
+
+Now to my biological analogy: It was recently my privilege to be
+conducted over the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New
+York City. You will remember that to it some millions of dollars have
+been assigned, for the purpose of discovering the cause and cure of
+bacterial diseases. In one department of the Institute a Japanese
+professor showed under the rays of the ultra-microscope specimens of a
+remarkable bacillus, the existence of which he had been the first to
+detect. It was that kind of bacillus which, if it is present in the
+marrow of a man's spinal cord, induces a state of the body that is
+called locomotor-ataxy. This state is one in which the man who
+manifests it is unable to control properly the movements of his feet
+and legs. He has lost command from the supreme cerebral centre; the
+lower nerve ganglia seem to have become insubordinate and to act on
+their own initiative. But is locomotor-ataxy a disease? Clearly your
+answer will depend upon whether you are on the side of the man or the
+microbe. If you sympathize with the man and are thinking of him, it is
+a disease; but if your heart is with the microbe there in the spinal
+cord, the locomotor-ataxy will be to you life and health abundant, and
+that not only for the individual specimen whom you pick out for
+observation, but for his whole family which, as the ataxy advances,
+reproduces itself proportionately, and with an inconceivable rapidity.
+
+What is to determine whether you are on the side of the man or the
+microbe? Surely the constitutional bent of your emotional and
+volitional preference. It is not a matter for the science of fact to
+consider. Mere intellect, mere reason, knows nothing of health and
+disease, unless it assumes this distinction as its starting-point. It
+knows only the order of sequences. Suppose, then, we were to find that
+civilization had pitted itself against Man, so that it was a case of
+Man _versus_ Civilization, as Herbert Spencer conceived an antagonism
+between Man and the State. Should we not be compelled, in order to
+decide what condition of things was one of health, to open up conscious
+relations with our deepest trend of heart and will, and find out
+whether we flowed with humanity or with civilization? Nor would there
+be any escape from the necessity of remaining true to our own trend and
+favoring whatever flowed the same way. In case of a clash between the
+social order and humanity, the health of each is to the other as a
+disease and, therefore, the question inevitably arises, "Which is in
+our judgment to be preserved?" and each one's answer must depend on
+whether he finds himself after full deliberation irresistibly drawn to
+the one side or the other. Civilization may be to man as the microbe to
+the locomotor-ataxy subject; but innate civilizationists would delight
+in the surrender of humanity to the social order. To them what would
+humanity be but civilization's opportunity, its habitat, its
+food-supply? I am saying that, to prove trade immoral it is not enough
+to show that man is a sacrifice to the economic order; you would be
+required also to demonstrate that man ought not to be sacrificed to any
+social order, that he must always be the final end, and never a mere
+means. But that is exactly what you can never demonstrate to any one
+who is not innately, spiritually, naturally, on the side of man against
+all other objects of interest. I mean that there is no arguing with any
+one who constitutionally hesitates to side with man. You might pray for
+such a one; but it would be folly to reason with him, for the
+foundation is not in him upon which your reasonings could mount. All
+this seems to me necessary to say, because I get the impression from
+books on political economy that most writers and readers first
+dehumanize themselves as a prerequisite to a discussion of the morals
+of trade.
+
+
+
+
+VI. THE LIVING FOUNDATIONS
+
+
+In one of his allegorical poems, James Russell Lowell depicted the
+antagonism of sentiment to which I am referring as existing between
+Christ and his conventional worshippers. The poem is a slight thing:
+although strict in metre and perfect in rhyme, it is too flowing and
+fantastic to be classed high in literature. But if we view it as a
+scientific essay in dynamic sociology, it is admirable beyond
+criticism. As its meaning is quite separable from its form and sensuous
+contents, I therefore ask you not to think of it as poetry or Christian
+mythology, but to regard it only as a compact treatise in ethical
+economics. Because this poem is familiar to you all, it will serve my
+object the better. It represents Christ as coming back to earth after
+eighteen hundred years, and all the grandees as rendering Him elaborate
+homage. Nor do they omit to direct His attention to His own image set
+up in the places of highest honor. But still, according to our dynamic
+sociologist:--
+
+ ... wherever his steps they led,
+ The Lord in sorrow bent down His head,
+ And from under the heavy foundation stones
+ The Son of Mary heard bitter groans.
+
+ And in church and palace and judgment-hall,
+ He marked great fissures that rent the wall,
+ And opened wider and still more wide
+ As the living foundations heaved and sighed.
+
+ "Have ye founded your thrones and altars, then,
+ On the bodies and souls of living men?
+ And think ye that building shall endure
+ Which shelters the noble and crushes the poor?"
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ Then Christ sought out an artisan--
+ A low-browed, stunted, haggard man,
+ And a motherless girl, whose fingers thin
+ Pushed from her faintly Want and Sin.
+
+ These set He in the midst of them,
+ And as they drew back their garment-hem
+ For fear of defilement, "Lo, here," said He,
+ "The images ye have made of Me!"
+
+To-day no one denies that the foundations are alive and that they heave
+and sigh. In our age one need not be of the order of Christ to have
+ears to hear the bitter groans. Everybody hears them, if one may judge
+from the universal reports of the daily papers. Indeed, how to suppress
+the groans or to prevent them from becoming more articulate and
+coherent is the most vexing problem of the government of the most
+civilized state in the world. At least Prince von Bülow so represents
+the case in his book entitled _Imperial Germany_. And the party leaders
+of the United States have all been alert for two decades to discover
+how to render impossible an upheaval of the living foundations of
+America. There is, as I say, no denying the fact that the foundations
+are alive, and that they not only groan bitterly, but--what is more
+serious--heave threateningly. Whether any one person, however, is on
+the side of the living foundations, as according to Lowell Jesus Christ
+was, or on the side of the thrones and altars, as his conventional
+worshippers are depicted to be by Lowell and many another American
+writer since, depends upon what the special person's innate taste is.
+The thrones and altars have become more and more magnificent in beauty,
+costliness, and splendor, with the progress of civilization; but not so
+the mob, the rabble, the "underworld," whose stirrings have rent the
+walls. Christ's taste, it would seem, was not primarily aesthetic. But
+then not every one is a son of Mary, and not every carpenter's son
+sides with the class to which his father belonged.
+
+
+
+
+VII. CIVILIZATION CONDEMNED BY CHRIST AND ALL SONS OF MAN
+
+
+I said that after my biological analogy I should cite the judgments of
+some great sages who saw in civilization an enemy of man. Of these I
+have just been mentioning the greatest. The Founder of Christianity set
+His Will dead against the established order of society, rebuking the
+upholders of thrones and altars, and becoming the champion of the
+outcasts. The kingdom, He announced, was not to be of this our world of
+moneylenders. No wonder the rulers of His day gave Him short quarter,
+so that after three years of agitation this speaker of rousing parables
+to the multitude, who had no bank account, was silenced forever.
+Likewise, it was a foregone conclusion that every disciple of Christ
+whose spirit was to be set aflame by His--like St. Francis, and
+Savonarola, Wycliffe, Luther (at the first), and John Wesley--should
+turn in pity to the living foundations and in horror of spirit from the
+entombing thrones.
+
+But the protest against the sacrifice of man to mammonized society has
+been no monopoly of Christ and those spiritually descended from Him.
+The ancient Hebrew prophets taught equally a kingdom that was to be
+diametrically the opposite in principle from that which prevailed in
+the Jewish State or in Babylon, and later in Macedon or Rome. It should
+be noted that the prophets and Christ accompanied their censure of the
+formative principle, upon which nations and traders had built up their
+dealings with one another, with a proposed substitute. But if we go
+back to Gautama and the India of his time, we find that the Buddha's
+protest against civilization was still more extreme; for he did not
+wait to submit a new principle before condemning the old. Indeed, he
+felt that self-conscious existence for the individual, as he beheld it
+everywhere, was a tragic calamity, and altogether unendurable.
+Preferable would be the extinction utterly of all individualized
+selfhood. He would isolate the individual and submit him to a
+discipline, the object of which was escape forever from the wheel of
+existence. He advocated not mere individualistic anarchy, but the
+annihilation of individuality as preferable to civilized life. A third
+of the human race still believe in his discipline, and in the
+alternative he proposed to the highly developed type of social order
+which prevailed in his time in India.
+
+Nor do Gautama, the prophets, and Christ stand alone. All the great
+humanists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although
+professing no discipleship of earlier teachers, were at one with them
+in condemning the root-principle of the existing co-ordination of human
+lives in politics, economics, and education. The cry of Rousseau, "Back
+to Nature!" and all the watchwords of Voltaire and the encyclopædists,
+were so many summonses to revolt against the entire order of organized
+society. The same meaning underlay all the writings of Fourier and
+Prudhomme, of Owen and the other English communists. It was as if they
+all said, "Civilization is a disease; let us rid ourselves of it." With
+the socialists, Marx and Lassalle, and the anarchists, like Stepniak
+and Kropotkin, the condemnation of society, as it is and always had
+been, was equally radical and sweeping. Even humanists less violent in
+their protest, not so negative in their criticism, nor so positive in
+their offered substitutes, like Carlyle and Emerson, like Shelley and
+Whitman and Swinburne, like Henry George and Henry Demorest Lloyd, all
+aim to create in us the judgment that civilization, as it has been from
+the first, is no friend to the best in any man. No lover of humanity
+seems ever to have worshipped the god who rules over the things that
+are established. They all agree with the mediæval theologians that this
+world has been given over to the Prince of Darkness.
+
+
+
+
+VIII. TWO INSTANCES OF CIVILIZATION
+
+
+We may come to wonder the less at this adverse judgment when we have
+considered two instances of the effects which the highest types of
+civilization have had upon the masses of mankind who were brought under
+its sway. Take ancient Egypt and ancient Athens. Go back to the
+building of the pyramids. Although they are among the earliest
+monuments of civilization, they are yet among the most marvellous
+illustrations of the mastery of the human mind over matter. Scarcely
+three had passed of the ten thousand years which have constituted the
+epoch that superseded barbarism, before these vast tombs, or whatever
+they are, began to be erected. Lost in admiration as he stands before
+the Great Pyramid, how can any one but resent the suggestion that the
+social order, which made it at last possible, was a disease, preying
+upon the body and spirit of men?
+
+And yet, if one turns from it to examine that organization of human
+labor and that control of the wills of the masses of Egypt which made
+it possible, and then again looks up at it, one marks great fissures
+that rend the whole mass and one hears the foundations groan. To speak
+thus is only an imaginative way of saying, what all the anthropologists
+and archaeologists tell us, that to the building of any one of the
+great pyramids went the enforced labor of upwards of a million men for
+many years, who were literally driven by the lash of the whip. There is
+no ground for supposing that the feel of the whip, when the back of an
+Egyptian slave began to bleed, was different from what we should suffer
+if the stroke fell now on us: nor that cries of pain were any the less
+natural then. And we must remember that, according to the unanimous
+opinion of anthropologists, the organization of enforced labor is one
+of the essentials of civilization. Picturesque and vivid, but not
+exaggerated, is the saying of the author of that able book, _The
+Nemesis of Nations_: "Civilization begins with the crack of the whip."
+Lord Cromer quotes this dictum in his work on Egypt as giving an
+epitome of the kind of power behind the civilizing process as it has
+always manifested itself in the land of the Nile; and then, lest those
+of his readers who live in the glass house of English history should
+commit the ridiculous sin of unconscious hypocrisy, he gently but
+firmly reminds us that many inhumanities of a similar spirit,
+especially towards offenders against the laws of property, were not
+suppressed in England till the beginning of the nineteenth century.
+
+In these comments of mine upon Egypt, I may seem to have appealed to
+your sentiment of humanity; but I have never for a moment forgotten
+that no instance from history can prove civilization a disease except
+to those who are intuitively on the side of the man instead of the
+microbe, of the people instead of the pyramid. Such instances, however,
+are of value in bringing those who listen to them to a clear
+self-consciousness of their own primal preference--and that is a
+distinct gain, even when the preference is for the pyramid.
+
+It cannot be denied that the masses of Egypt were a sacrifice--and not
+willingly--to civilization. In the preceding periods of savagery and
+barbarism, there had been no such enslavement; the organization of
+enforced labor had not proceeded so far. The crack of the whip was
+still as yet intermittent. According to Lewis Morgan, civilization is
+the progress of man from beast to citizen. Well, until ten thousand
+years ago, man was more beast than citizen; but, happily for him, among
+the beasts of the field there is nothing parallel to this organization
+of labor through the will of one by means of the stroke of the courbash
+upon the backs of the many.
+
+
+Some students who shrink in horror from the Egyptian type of
+civilization plead nevertheless for the type which was manifested in
+ancient Greece. Let us go, then, to Athens in the age of Pericles, that
+period of her glory concerning which Professor Freeman somewhere says
+that to have lived but ten years in the midst of it would have been
+worth a hundred of modern mediocrity. Who can think otherwise as he
+recalls the Athenian drama, eloquence and philosophy, architecture and
+sculpture? But when one turns to the organization of society, as it was
+in Athens, to find out at what human price the splendor was bought of
+that dazzling decade when the Parthenon was being built, one finds that
+of the inhabitants of that City of the Light scarcely more than thirty
+thousand were free men, while two hundred thousand were slaves. Again,
+the living foundations groan! And if our heart, by its nature, insists
+on going out to the sacrificed, our delight in Athenian _Kultur_ will
+be henceforth shot through with anguish. Our only way of escape will be
+by absorbing Nietzsche into our system until the poison paralyzes our
+impulse to pity. But you may think that if we shift our investigation,
+we shall find relief. Let us enquire, then, into the position of woman
+instead of the man-slave in Athens. Alas! we are now confronted with
+facts which reveal, on the part of one whole half of Greek mankind, the
+surrender of their distinctive humanity to civilization, to that
+process whereby sentient beings are transformed from beasts into
+citizens. Professor Westermarck sums up the attitude of civilization to
+women in these terms:--
+
+ Nowhere else has the difference in culture between men and women
+ been so immense as in the fully-developed Greek civilization. The
+ lot of a wife in Greece was retirement and ignorance. She lived in
+ almost absolute seclusion, in a separate part of the house,
+ together with her female slaves, deprived of all the educating
+ influence of male society, and having no place at those public
+ spectacles which were the chief means of culture.
+
+He then calls attention to the startling absence from the whole of
+Greek literature of any evidence that any man who had received the
+training which Greek culture gave ever fell in love with any woman. In
+his chapter on the "Subjection of Wives," Professor Westermarck further
+says:--
+
+ The status of wives is in various respects connected with the ideas
+ held about the female sex in general. Woman is commonly looked upon
+ as a slight, dainty, and relatively weak creature, destitute of all
+ nobler qualities. Especially among nations more advanced in culture
+ she is regarded as intellectually and morally inferior to man. In
+ Greece, in the historic age, the latter recognized in her no other
+ end than to minister to his pleasure and to become the mother of
+ his children.
+
+This author finds the Greek subjection of wives, as you will have
+noted, no exception to the universal rule as to the relation of culture
+to womanhood. After speaking of the status of woman among the ancient
+Hebrews, and the position assigned her by that greatest instrument of
+European civilization called the Roman Catholic Church, he repeats his
+generalization in these terms:--
+
+ Progress in civilization has exercised an unfavorable influence on
+ the position of woman by widening the gulf between the sexes, as
+ the higher culture was almost exclusively the prerogative of the
+ men. Moreover, religion, and especially the great religions of the
+ world, has contributed to the degradation of the female sex by
+ regarding woman as unclean.
+
+
+
+
+IX. THE AGE OF THE FOUNDATIONS AT HAND
+
+
+Is this degradation an inevitable outcome of the animating principle at
+the heart of the process whereby sentient beings have thus far been
+transformed from beasts into citizens? We are forced to answer "Yes."
+Otherwise, why has the relative degradation of woman deepened
+universally with the progress of civilization? If Westermarck is right,
+it would seem that the lowest foundations of highly developed society
+have always consisted of the bodies and souls of women. If such be the
+historic fact, it may seem strange that only in our day, but now the
+world over, is heard the wail of women crying to be freed. Perhaps the
+reason, however, that we for the first time hear the wail is because
+never before had the fissures grown wide enough to allow the fainter,
+but more piteous, sighs to escape.
+
+The fact, too, of which there is no doubt, that at last in our age even
+women are beginning to be revered as responsible moral and spiritual
+agents may be a sign that the Day of the Foundations is come, that the
+age of civilization is nearing its close, and that a new era, animated
+by a fresh principle of human co-ordination, is at hand. There is at
+least evidence that many women are asking: "Are the products of
+civilization worth the price which we women have been compelled to pay,
+in order that they may exist? Is our subjection justifiable?" In reply,
+the men who entertain an innate contempt for woman answer, "Yes"; those
+who are moved by the extreme opposite of sentiment have arrived at the
+bitter, though chivalrous, thought, "Better the non-existence of the
+human race than the continued sacrifice of its womankind"; while even
+the sons of the golden mean in judgment go so far as to say that not
+only the already acquired benefits of civilization, but finer ones and
+more abundant, can from now on be attained by some other process, which
+will involve no degradation either to workingman or to woman, and which
+in structural principle and human effects will differ as much from
+civilization as civilization itself differed from the barbarism and
+savagery which preceded it.
+
+My own judgment is, that civilization is nearing its close. Four or
+five deadly blows were dealt out to it by four or five events which
+happened in the middle of the fifteenth century after Christ, and it
+has been staggering ever since. In that century, certain things
+occurred which produced the very opposite effect upon the masses of
+mankind to that produced by the wonderful thing which had happened ten
+thousand years ago and by its occurrence had changed radically the
+relation of men and women to the community and to the physical universe
+in which they lived. What was begun in the fifteenth century by the
+events that took place then, and what was continued as a destructive
+process until recently, is, in my judgment, being finished now through
+a constructive process which has been set up by certain other
+things--some ten or twenty--which have happened since the beginning of
+the present century.
+
+
+
+
+X. A NEW STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLE
+
+
+It has seemed to me necessary at this point in my argument to call
+attention to the introduction into social life in the fifteenth century
+of a new working principle which has been in direct antagonism to the
+basic idea of civilization, because it must be borne in mind that
+during the last four centuries the history of Europe and the New World
+furnishes illustrations of two conflicting processes of social
+integration. Not everything that has happened since the New World was
+discovered can be set down to the credit of that process which is still
+ascendant in Prussia. Instances, therefore, from modern history which
+go against my account of civilization have no weight against my
+contention and cannot be raised against me; modern instances must not
+only be shown to be facts, but to be vital outputs of the same
+principle that animates the old order. To account every co-ordination
+of modern social life as an instance of civilization is as if any one
+should cite the turbine engine and its achievements and set these down
+to the credit of the piston engine. But the idea of the one is wholly
+new and not a further evolution of the old. Or it is as if one should
+assign the glory of the motor-car to the inventor of the bicycle, or of
+the bicycle to the originator of the horse-cart; or as if one should
+point to an aeroplane as an illustration of a further stage in the
+evolution of the motor-car. It is a fact that the aeroplane came after,
+but not a fact that it came _from_, the motor-car. If, as I believe,
+the new order which began to manifest itself in the fifteenth century
+stands to civilization as the aeroplane to the motorcar, and as the
+motor-car to the bicycle and the horse-cart, or as the turbine to the
+piston engine, then I am right in claiming that we ought not to call it
+civilization. If we do, we should be acting like any one who insisted
+upon calling an airship a horse-cart. There might be reasons for so
+doing: and there may be reasons for calling things civilization which
+are something quite different. For instance, I can conceive that the
+new order might be more easily insinuated into general acceptance if
+those whose interests are all vested in the old are not informed that
+it is new. But tonight I am treating not of words, but of things; and
+if it will hasten the triumph of the new order to pretend that it is
+civilization, let us by all means do so--just as we call six o'clock
+seven in order to gain an extra hour of sunlight during the waking day.
+
+I know that to many the idea will appear grotesquely naive, that an
+institution as old as civilization and so wide-spreading should come to
+an end and be superseded by something else, and that this change should
+be taking place under our very eyes. But, happily for me, the
+world-conflict which is now devastating Europe has begun to undermine
+in the soul of many the fetish-worship of civilization. And to assist
+further in breaking the spell which civilization may have cast over the
+imagination of most of my audience, I would remind you that
+civilization is, after all, a mere mushroom growth, and that what has
+sprung up only overnight cannot have taken deep root (as if it were a
+thing practically eternal), and could not be very difficult to replace
+by something more deliberately thought out--by something learned
+through ten thousand years of the tragic effects experienced by
+thousands of millions of human beings. Civilization, I say, is a mere
+mushroom growth, as compared with the whole life-period of man's
+existence on earth. It is only ten thousand years old; while, by the
+most modest and cautious calculation, man has existed one hundred
+thousand years; and during the ninety thousand which preceded the last
+ten, he made gigantic progress towards self-knowledge and
+self-reverence. Let us, therefore, not be browbeaten by civilization on
+account of its antiquity.
+
+
+
+
+XI. EDWARD CARPENTER'S INDICTMENT OF CIVILIZATION
+
+
+Equally must we guard against the fallacy of attributing only the
+beneficent effects of civilization to its inherent principle, while we
+trace all the evils which have arisen in its train to extrinsic
+causes--to human nature, or to superficial and local obstructions. This
+word of warning brings me back to Mr. Edward Carpenter's essay on
+_Civilization: Its Cause and Cure_; for when I first read it he
+appeared to me to exaggerate out of all proportion the evils in modern
+life as compared with the good in it: especially did I feel that he
+erred in that he accounted the evils as permanent and organic
+characteristics of the civilizing process itself, and believed that
+they must increase with its development and could not be eradicated
+except with its extinction. During the last twenty-six years, however,
+I have learned a thing or two. I have not lost one jot or tittle of my
+early faith in man, and I have even gained fresh hope for a speedy
+issue of the human race out of most of its sufferings and sins; but I
+have gained this fresh hope only because I have been drawn by wider and
+closer observation of economic events--and especially of the new
+developments of trade and politics the world over--to the conclusion
+that the evils, however great, are to be traced to the false principle
+that animates the civilizing process, and that they will fall away of
+themselves when once that principle has been exchanged for another that
+is already well known, and which, as I have remarked, began four
+centuries ago to disintegrate the established order.
+
+Carpenter's indictment of civilization seems to me incontrovertible.
+The best way for me to present it briefly will be by means of a number
+of typical quotations, in which he indicates the nature of disease and
+shows that such is the state--mental, physical, social, and
+moral--induced in man by the organization of enforced labor and the
+whole of the adopted method of making citizens out of wild beasts:--
+
+ When we come to analyze the conception of disease, physical or
+ mental, in society or the individual, it evidently means ... loss
+ of unity. Health, therefore, should mean unity. ... The idea should
+ be a positive one--a condition of the body in which it is an
+ entirety, a unity, a central force maintaining that condition; and
+ disease being the break-up--or break-down--of that entirety into
+ multiplicity.... Thus in a body, the establishment of an
+ insubordinate centre--a boil, a tumor, the introduction and spread
+ of a germ with innumerable progeny throughout the system, the
+ enlargement out of all reason of an existing organ--means disease.
+ In the mind, disease begins when any passion asserts itself as an
+ independent centre of thought and action.... What is a taint in the
+ mind is also a taint in the body. The stomach has started the
+ original idea of becoming itself the centre of the human system.
+ The sexual organs may start a similar idea. Here are distinct
+ threats, menaces made against the central authority--against the
+ Man himself. For the man must rule, or disappear; it is impossible
+ to imagine a man presided over by a Stomach--a walking Stomach,
+ using hands, feet, and all the other members merely to carry it
+ from place to place, and serve its assimilative mania. So of the
+ Brain, or any other organ; for the Man is no organ, resides in no
+ organ, but is the central life ruling and radiating among all
+ organs, and assigning them their parts to play. Disease, then, in
+ mind or body, is ... the abeyance of a central power and the growth
+ of insubordinate centres--life in each creature being conceived of
+ as a continual exercise of energy or conquest, by which external or
+ antagonistic forces (or organisms) are brought into subjection and
+ compelled into the service of the creature, or are thrown off as
+ harmful to it. Thus, by way of illustration, we find that plants or
+ animals, when in good health, have a remarkable power of throwing
+ off the attacks of any parasites which incline to infest them;
+ while those that are weakly are very soon eaten up by the same. A
+ rose-tree, for instance, brought indoors, will soon fall a prey to
+ the aphis, though when hardened out of doors the pest makes next to
+ no impression on it. In dry seasons when the young turnip plants in
+ the field are weakly from want of water, the entire crop is
+ sometimes destroyed by the turnip-fly, which then multiplies
+ enormously; but if a shower or two of rain comes before much damage
+ is done, the plant will then grow vigorously, its tissues become
+ more robust and resist the attacks of the fly, which in its turn
+ dies. Late investigations seem to show that one of the functions of
+ the white corpuscles of the blood is to devour disease-germs and
+ bacteria present in the circulation,--thus absorbing these
+ organisms into subjection to the central life of the body,--and
+ that for this object they congregate in numbers toward any part of
+ the body which is wounded or diseased.
+
+
+
+
+XII. CARPENTER'S FALSE REMEDY
+
+
+To cast Carpenter's metaphor, according to which civilization is a
+thing to be cured, into the form of an analogy, we might say that the
+civilizing process has been to man what the bringing indoors is to a
+rose-tree, or the coming of a drought to the turnips in a field. And I
+ask you to assume with me that this is so; as it will help me to get on
+with my argument, which, as it advances, will reveal more and more
+whether it be inherently weak or strong. Nor do I anticipate much
+opposition to Carpenter's mere indictment of civilization. At least it
+is only when he outlines his remedy that my own protest is aroused. And
+I suspect that many a reader will feel with me, that while to cure a
+rose-tree or a turnip plant may require only the taking of the one out
+of doors again and the falling of the kindly showers upon the other,
+the restoration of civilized man to health would necessitate something
+more than a mere return on his part to Nature and savagery. Indeed,
+such a return may be altogether impossible, and even undesirable. In my
+judgment, man having (as Carpenter himself points out) become
+"self-conscious," can never go back to Nature, since he is no longer
+the same being he was when he emerged from his more primitive state.
+Yet what Carpenter recommends so far as he recommends any cure, is
+exactly this: Human beings are to wear less clothes--if any at all; man
+will again live out of doors, for the most part, instead of in houses;
+he will return to the eating of uncooked food--mainly fruit and grains;
+he will begin to feel himself one again with Nature; he is to lose his
+sense of sin; every man will do the work he likes--and presumably not
+do the work he does not like. "As to External Government and Law, they
+will disappear," says Carpenter, "for they are only the travesties and
+transitory substitutes of Inward Government and Order." In religion,
+there is to be a like return to Nature. The author says:--
+
+ And when the civilization-period has passed away, the old
+ Nature-religion--perhaps greatly grown--will come back.... Our
+ Christian ceremonial is saturated with sexual and astronomical
+ symbols; and long before Christianity existed, the sexual and
+ astronomical were the main forms of religion.... On the high tops
+ once more gathering he will celebrate with naked dances the glory
+ of the human form and the great processions of the stars....
+
+Carpenter sees signs already here and there of the beginning of this
+return:--
+
+ The present competitive society is more and more rapidly becoming a
+ mere dead formula and husk within which the outlines of the new and
+ _human_ society are already discernible. Simultaneously, and as if
+ to match this growth, a move toward Nature and Savagery is for the
+ first time taking place from within, instead of being forced upon
+ Society from without. The Nature-movement, begun years ago in
+ Literature and Art, is now among the more advanced sections of the
+ civilized world rapidly realizing itself in actual life, going so
+ far even as a denial, among some, of machinery and the complex
+ products of Civilization, and developing among others into a gospel
+ of salvation by sandals and sunbaths!
+
+In order to help us to judge aright whether a return to Nature and a
+primitive communism would restore to man that centrality and health of
+which we assume that civilization has deprived him, we should do well
+to consider what it was that happened ten thousand years ago and proved
+so sinister in changing the relation of men and women to the community
+in which they lived, and to the physical universe. But of that event we
+cannot gain an adequate appreciation unless we view it in perspective
+along the line of analogous events, some six, which had occurred from
+time to time during the ninety thousand years preceding.
+
+
+
+
+XIII. SPEECH AND FIRE
+
+
+A hundred thousand years ago, among our ancestors, who then were only
+inarticulate mammals, living in trees and caves, one of them by
+himself, or a little group of them together, hit upon the use of
+articulate vocal signs as a means of conveying to his mates his needs,
+his fears, his desires and threats. It was probably by a happy fluke
+that he hit upon this use, or by some transcendent flash of insight due
+to a spontaneous variation of ability above that of the average ape; or
+else some unusual stress of hunger or danger of attack drove even a
+mediocre individual to an unwonted exercise of ingenuity. In any case,
+by inventing articulate speech, he brought into existence a new species
+of mammal--man. I must leave to your imagination the thousand
+transforming effects of this new device for communicating perceptions,
+feelings, and intentions. The speaking ape stood to his own species,
+and through them to other kinds of animals and to the material
+universe, in a different relation from that in which the speechless
+stood. The power of combined action among the members of any group
+became immeasurably greater than it had previously been. A social unity
+of will was possible that could never have existed on earth hitherto.
+For all we know, thirty thousand years may have passed away before any
+other event occurred among human beings comparable in practical
+importance to the invention of spoken language. This, however, was all
+the time being gradually perfected under the stress of new experiences
+in general and of trying predicaments in particular.
+
+Then, in the fulness of time, and once more by a happy fluke, or by a
+stroke of spontaneous genius, or under the pressure of some
+unprecedented danger, or through the educative influence of some new
+order of experience, one of the speaking apes hit upon the use of fire,
+and thereby introduced a new era in the advancement of man. Practically
+infinite was the increase of man's new mastery over Nature. Into
+temperate and even icy regions he could now penetrate and, as it were,
+create around him a little temporary zone of tropical warmth. With
+speech had come social unity; with fire at man's disposal came mastery
+over matter. But the unity thereby suffered a change. With the
+invention of means of creating artificial warmth the social homogeneity
+of the tribe began to be broken. Whoever controlled fire controlled the
+rest of his group, since no other way for the tribal appropriation of
+the blessings of regulated fire was possible among talking apes, except
+that one individual, or a very few, should assume the office of owner
+of the sticks or flints for igniting the fire, and should become
+dispenser of the flame. The group thus was divided into the controller
+and the controlled, the owner and the owned, the master and the man,
+the governor and the governed, the chief and his followers.
+
+
+
+
+XIV. THE TWO MARKS OF ALL CIVILIZATION
+
+
+Such a differentiation of society was, among apes, the condition for
+any sort of social unity; but control by the few could at the first
+have been only rudimentary and intermittent. Fire is not everything,
+and was indispensable only on certain occasions, as when the group
+were caught unexpectedly in some wintry region. Then the choice for
+any man might lie between freezing or obeying. Be it observed that
+fire under such circumstances would be shared by all, but the power of
+social control would be monopolized by one. Had you been there, but
+not the mightiest of your group, the condition of your surviving the
+cold would have been that you surrendered whatever individual
+initiative you had had. You gained fire, but lost freedom. At this
+point, by some innate sense of logical identity, my mind is carried
+forward a hundred thousand years to that centre of to-day's highest
+civilization--Detroit, and to its very palladium, the Ford Motor
+Works. For in that far-famed institution is to be found a very
+striking similarity to the primeval monopoly of initiative which arose
+with the first control of fire. Mr. Henry Ford has been magnanimously
+ready to share profits with his men, but, so far as I can learn, no
+iota of the industrial control.
+
+Before I go to the next step towards citizenship, I would call
+attention to the fact that thus, near to the beginning of things human,
+when the use of fire was introduced, we are able to detect the two
+distinguishing characteristics of all civilization, and of trade in
+particular, which are the sharing by the tribe of the blessings of
+man's mastery over Nature, but, as the condition of the sharing, a
+monopoly of power and initiative by the few who dispense the blessings.
+So much of good and of goods--but no more--could the mass of men enjoy
+as was compatible with the continuance of the master's ascendancy over
+the men and over the public. We shall find no other than these marks in
+all future civilization, to distinguish it from savagery and barbarism.
+The only difference will be that in the period of civilization
+proper--that is, from ten thousand years ago to the end of the
+fifteenth century after Christ, when the established social order began
+to break up--the monopoly of initiative and control is practically
+absolute. As we trace the future steps in human evolution, we shall see
+how this concentration of power in the hands of rulers occurred. But it
+must be further observed that it is not only rudimentary civilization
+which we detect as ensuing upon the introduction of the use of fire: it
+is trade, socialized wealth, the division of the community into the
+"haves" and the "have-nots," the introduction of the working of the
+law, that to him that hath shall be given and that from him that hath
+nothing but his labor to offer shall be taken with it his liberty also.
+It should likewise be borne in mind that with the stealing of fire from
+heaven came also that coalition of government with trade, of politics
+with commerce, of the monopolists of economic power with the dictators
+of life and death, of peace and war, which is manifested to the highest
+conceivable degree to-day in the states most assertive of their
+leadership in the vanguard of civilization. I said that with the use of
+fire came the enslavement of men; but government and enslavement were
+one and the same thing. Neither, however, was as yet dominant over
+social life.
+
+
+
+
+XV. ARROWS AND EARTHENWARE
+
+
+The talking, fire-using anthropoid in the course of time invented the
+bow and arrow. So great and so enduring were the benefits of this new
+device that it is almost impossible for us, who have profited by them,
+to imagine the state of human society when men could kill animals or
+destroy enemies only by throwing stones or clubs, or by striking with
+the fist. But it is easy to see that the chief of a tribe of men
+received an incalculable increase of power when, besides the
+instruments of ignition, bows and arrows were in his possession to deal
+out at his will. Whatever equality of initiative and diffused
+sovereignty had existed before the use of fire was known, it now began
+to vanish, and the men of any tribe saw power concentrated in the will
+and word of the chief and those nearest him, while submission to his
+command was the condition of survival. And no doubt, with the loss of
+that individual liberty and that self-reliance which characterize the
+lower animals, there also died away a certain joyousness and zest of
+spontaneous self-fulfilment, such as we observe in wild creatures so
+long as they are free from hunger and thirst and secure from the
+pursuit of enemies.
+
+It was perhaps another ten thousand years before one more new link in
+the chain of man's mastery over Nature and the chief's mastery over his
+men was forged. This time it was probably a woman who--again by a happy
+chance or by necessity of maternal solicitude--noticed the effect of
+heat upon clay and introduced the art of pottery. Until then men had no
+utensils that could withstand the action of fire; they could not boil
+water except by dropping hot stones into some receptacle of wood or
+skin. Now, by the new device of boiling, the food-supply was enormously
+increased. The blessing of another mastery over matter was henceforth
+shared by all the members of the tribe. But, at the same time, there
+was a corresponding force added to the chief's grip upon his men. We
+see the law illustrated, that every new invention, owned by the few,
+becomes one more trap for the many. The differentiation between the
+owner of the tribe's wealth and the propertyless became with the
+introduction of pottery fixed and hopeless. The master dealt out not
+only fire and arrows, but cooking-utensils; or he withheld all these if
+he saw fit; and if you had been there, but not in command, you, too,
+would have tamely submitted or have died.
+
+
+
+
+XVI. ANIMALS TAMED AND IRON SMELTED
+
+
+The word "tamely" which I have just used, brings me to the next great
+event which moved mankind perceptibly nearer to civilization proper.
+It is an event which was not only a literal fact of prime importance,
+but which is eternally a symbol of man's own fate. It was probably
+first the dog that lent himself to the imagination of the speaking,
+fire-making, arrow-shooting, clay-baking, anthropoid ape, as a
+stimulus to the idea that captive animals might be of service to human
+beings. Man began to tame not only the dog, but the sheep, the ox, the
+camel, the goat, the horse, and the elephant. The gain to all the
+tribe was enormous. The men all shared in the profit, but once more
+their master appropriated the new increment in power. He became the
+owner of the domesticated animals as well as of the inanimate pot and
+arrow and flame. But at this stage it must have seemed to all the
+other members of the tribe that they also were owned, soul and body,
+by their chief. They could not help seeing, nor could he, that they
+were _his_ men. And how natural it was for them to rejoice in the fact
+that they belonged to some one who was mightier than themselves, and
+who identified his own prosperity with that of the tribe, and of every
+individual in it who served it according to his will. Loyalty to the
+beloved community became loyalty to the chief. But it is evident that
+what mankind had caused to happen to the dog and the horse, the chief
+had accomplished in regard to the human beings who had come under his
+power. He had tamed them; they were no longer wild animals. They had
+rendered up individual liberty and self-reliant independence such as
+we see among many species of wild beasts. But instead, as the price of
+obedience to a will outside their own, they had received a thousand
+creature-comforts.
+
+Only one more invention was needed to lift them to the highest and
+latest stage of barbarism. Some one now hit upon the art of smelting
+iron--the first invention that had not directly to do with the
+supplying of food. By leaps and bounds the art of smelting iron
+advanced man in the equipment of war, in the building of houses, roads,
+and vehicles of transportation. Now what magnificent returns
+individuals received for having surrendered their original liberty to
+do as they pleased! After all, what would independent initiative have
+been worth without fire or arrow or earthern kettle, or cow or horse or
+wheel, or sword and shield? Who would not have forfeited the bare
+birthright of empty (although healthy) independence for participation
+in the ever richer conquest over the physical resources of Nature?
+
+
+
+
+XVII. CIVILIZATION PROPER
+
+
+But now at last, only ten thousand years ago, the event occurred which
+put forever out of the question any possibility of prudence in any
+waywardness of individual whim, or any deviation from the rule dictated
+by the owner of things. This time the something that happened did not
+cause an increase of man's mastery over physical Nature. It was,
+instead, like that initial invention which turned apes into men. And
+again, like spoken language, it was a device to facilitate
+communication of mind with mind. In some one of the many groups of
+beings who had learned the use of fire, arrows, pots, sheep, and
+swords, some genius hit upon the idea of written signs as a medium of
+communication with those distant in space, and as a means of
+perpetuating a knowledge of the will of the dead among his survivors.
+But be it observed that only the master, never the man, only the owner
+of things, the controller of circumstances, was in a position to embody
+and preserve his judgment and desire in written signs. The new art of
+writing enhanced the power of rulers, of chiefs. The Pharaoh, not the
+fellah, dictated the inscription that was to be engraved. Thus all the
+rulers of the past were now able to perpetuate their power by adding
+their sanction to the word of the living chief, while no voice from the
+ranks of the governed would be allowed to immortalize itself in written
+speech. This is the reason that written language introduced
+civilization proper. There was no longer any chance for the wildness of
+the beast to crop out. Here began the empire of the dead over the
+living; but it was the empire of dead rulers over living slaves. The
+mastery over Nature and the monopoly of social power thereby became
+practically infinite. The tamers were now omnipotent in comparison with
+the tamed. It must be noticed that the process of transforming beasts
+into citizens was one to which only the tamed, but not the tamers, were
+subjected. The ruler stood outside of and above the rule he made. The
+law was for his subjects. This was the case with Henry VIII at the acme
+of civilization as it had been with the first of the Pharaohs.
+
+Not only the blond beast of prey, but the swarthy also dictated an
+ethic for his subjects in order to keep himself in ascendancy. It was
+because Nietzsche admired all beasts of prey and felt contempt for
+their victims that he hated Jesus Christ and proudly assumed the title
+of Anti-Christ. For Christ had set up an ethic which encouraged the
+victims to protest and attempt to win back their primeval initiative,
+to take over the sovereignty which had been concentrated in the hands
+of the mighty and to diffuse it among the nobodies of the tribe. St.
+Luke goes so far as to assert that even before Jesus was born his
+Mother entertained levelling ideas. Into her lips he puts a song in
+which she magnifies the Lord because she believed her Son would bring
+down the mighty and exalt them of low degree. But alas! civilization
+went on for fifteen hundred years and succeeded in tying Christianity
+to the chariot-wheel of monopolized initiative.
+
+
+
+
+XVIII. THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY AFTER CHRIST
+
+
+Christianity had to wait for something to happen that would lend force
+to its Gospel. That something did not occur until the middle of the
+fifteenth century. Then, as I have already said without specifying what
+they were, a number of unforeseen events took place which opened the
+door to the divine bridegroom of humanity.
+
+I have said that in the fifteenth century after Christ a new principle
+began to work in society; but I did not say that it was then for the
+first time promulgated. Civilization was the organization of man's
+mastery over Nature on a basis of self-interest; it was the giving
+only so much of wealth and power to the many as was compatible with
+the retention of one's own ascendancy. To be civilized, then, is
+evidently not to be Christian any more than it is to be Buddhistic or
+Judaic, socialistic or democratic. Everybody admits that one can be
+civilized and be none of these things: just as one may be "cultured"
+without being kind. In other words, it is consistent with being
+civilized to be highly selfish; one need only be rationalized in one's
+egoism. Indeed, civilization is the incarnation of self-interest. If
+self-interest, its basic principle, should give way to social
+interest; if the monopoly of social power should be broken and the
+power transferred to the general will of the community; if the
+community should relegate its administration to representatives, but
+should prevent these by some social device from ever usurping the
+power entrusted to them, then something new--something as different
+from civilization as the airship from the horse-cart--would have begun
+to establish itself. A new species of social order can be nothing
+other than an order whose basic principle is totally new; and what
+greater difference could exist in structuralizing tendencies than that
+between self-interest and the interest of the community? Whenever the
+latter gets the upper hand, it will be because Fate, the Cosmos, the
+Universe, the force within unconscious evolution, has caught up the
+song of the _Magnificat_. No such consummation of humanity has taken
+place, but it is undeniable that in the fifteenth century the Word
+entered like a seed into the soil of Fact. The Virgin's prophecy began
+to fulfil itself.
+
+
+Familiar to everybody, and quickly to be specified, are the wonderful
+events which turned the vision into reality. One of these events was
+the invention of gunpowder; another was the mariner's compass; a third
+was the invention of paper; a fourth, the printing-press; a fifth was
+the discovery that the earth goes round the sun once a year, and whirls
+on its own axis once a day; a sixth was that indiscretion of
+Christopher Columbus, whereby instead of over-populated India he opened
+up a way to the vast and sparsely denizened Americas.
+
+These events, each and severally and all together, produced in one
+particular the same sort of effect as the use of fire and of the bow
+and arrow, of pottery, the domestication of animals, and the smelting
+of iron: they enhanced incalculably the mastery of man over matter. But
+in the other particular characteristic of civilization they acted in
+the very opposite direction from all preceding inventions. Instead of
+entrenching the master in his monopoly of social power, instead of
+furthering the differentiation of society into master and man, they all
+played into the hands of the man. For the first time since the
+beginning of human evolution, inventions checked the monopolization of
+control over others. But the initiative that now flowed to the
+multitude of nobodies was not that puny freedom and narrow scope of
+self-realization which the talking ape had enjoyed. It was the
+accumulated foresight and control of the universe outside of man which
+had been storing itself up more and more for ninety thousand years in
+the intellects and wills of the favored few. The floodgates were opened
+for the first time in the fifteenth century, and this godlike energy
+flowed in among the people at large, so that man, the many, the
+multitude, were quickened by it into hope on earth, unto life here and
+now, into liberty, creative originality, and the joy of
+self-realization.
+
+But it was only the beginning: the effects of the introduction of
+gunpowder, the compass, the printing-press and paper, and the new ideas
+about the heavens, and the opening-up of relatively uninhabited lands,
+were scarcely discernible for two centuries, and then only as a
+destructive force. Indeed, for still another hundred years the process
+was one chiefly of disintegration. There was taking place a
+transference of power from the few to the many; a diffusion of
+sovereignty, as well as a redistribution of wealth; and the change was
+accompanied by an awakening of the masses to the meaning of the
+transformation which they were undergoing. The people began to realize
+that the invention of gun-powder had raised the peasant as a fighter to
+the level of the armed knight; that the compass and the opening-up of
+the Western hemisphere made it possible for the poor to escape from
+European masters whom they were unable to vanquish; and that the
+cheapness of books was linking the minds of the masses to the sources
+of learning and of religious tradition. It cannot but excite our mystic
+wonder that for nearly one hundred thousand years every new mastery of
+man over physical Nature was such that it inevitably played into the
+hands of rulers by strengthening their monopoly of initiative; and that
+then, at last, and ever since the fifteenth century after Christ, each
+new mechanical invention or discovery has had the unintended and
+undesired effect ultimately of scattering among the many the pent-up
+power of owners and rulers, and of creating in the many fresh psychic
+energy and a new capacity of invention.
+
+This great process of levelling-up took again an enormous leap forward
+in the middle of the nineteenth century. The steam-engine advanced it
+almost as much as all the fifteenth-century inventions and discoveries
+together. The new facilities of travel brought new experiences, and
+these, by the psychological law of contrast and novelty, stimulated
+intelligence many-fold. The new speed in transportation made it
+possible for thousands to escape from oppression where scarcely one had
+been able to do so in former generations. The Irish peasants began to
+pour into America; then followed the Germans; soon Russians and Latins
+were helped to leave the Old World; sometimes in all came a million-odd
+in one year. Wealth was multiplied and scattered to a degree that had
+never been dreamed to be possible. Not only in the United States, but
+in France, Italy, Scandinavia, the British Empire, and South America,
+the diffusion of social initiative was taking place. First, power
+spread from the few to the many severally; but now, for a quarter of a
+century, the many, without surrendering, have been pooling their new
+power in the general will of the nation. There, in the unified and
+unifying purpose of nations like America, and of each of her federate
+States, the power is being safeguarded for the community and for its
+members severally by political devices which render public servants
+incapable of prolonged usurpation.
+
+
+
+
+XIX. CIVILIZATION FACES ITS SUCCESSOR
+
+
+Still, the new order is far from being in the ascendant. As
+civilization began with the introduction of the use of fire, but was
+not triumphant until the invention of written language, so the new
+order--call it what you will: Christianity, the Meaning of America, the
+Dream of California, the Wisconsin Idea, Social Democracy,
+Humanity--this new order has only entered in as yeast which has not yet
+had a chance to leaven the whole lump. But the fermentation now goes on
+apace. The World-War is perhaps best understood when it is looked upon
+as a struggle of civilization against its successor. Alarmed and armed
+to the teeth, civilization (applied science organized on a basis of
+reasoned self-interest) is attempting to expand itself over territory
+which had been preempted and mapped out by social democracy, and was
+being devoted, in the spirit of the ideal commonwealth foreshadowed in
+Christian sentiment and Jewish prophecy, to the co-ordination of wealth
+and power on the principle of deference to the humanity in every man.
+
+But more significant than the World-War of the passing away of the old
+order and its supersession by a new are the ten or twenty inventions,
+ideas, discoveries, and new social contacts which marked the first
+decade of the present century. No doubt even the World-War has been
+precipitated by the sudden inrush of these unprecedented forces, and
+the realization of their trend by the self-centred leaders of
+civilization.
+
+It would seem that the civilized, anticipating a move on the part of
+the humanized, and fearing an appropriation of the benefits of new
+inventions, stole a march upon the unsuspecting. The result is, that we
+saw at the outset of the war the latest appliances seized upon by the
+upholders of arbitrary power, and only now, after the first shock of
+attack, are the builders of an earthly paradise demonstrating their
+ability and intention to turn all the forces of Nature and devices of
+reason to the service of each in the brotherhood of the common life. We
+are beginning to see, also, that every one of the latest inventions is
+such in its nature that soon victory must come to the cause of economic
+and political equality.
+
+Even the cheapness of motor-cars will overtake the champions of
+industrial monopoly, who at the first used them for the hoarding of
+social power. The submarine can at the first only be turned against the
+freedom of the seas during times of peace. The aeroplane and the
+airship, more than any other instruments of locomotion, will assist in
+the diffusion of initiative among all the outlying and small nations of
+the earth. More than anything else they will assist the weak and the
+meek of the earth to rush together to one another's rescue; and
+wireless telegraphy, as soon as it is established universally, will
+sound to them the alarum in the twinkling of an eye. All the new
+inventions are, as it were, God's detectives for the exposing of the
+subtle and disguised crimes of the great; or they are God's captains
+for the mobilization of the scattered forces of the meek when the plot
+of an oppressor has been unearthed. The people need only to realize
+that the new inventions are by their very nature breakers of
+power-monopolies, in order to find in them an irresistible incentive to
+rise and act in the cause of world-wide democratic initiative. High
+explosives, the gas-engine, the giant gun, sheets of flame, deadly
+gases, all these are within the reach of Christ's little ones to
+encircle their kingdom-that-is-coming against the attacks of inhuman
+humans. The new inventions are humanity's destructors to annihilate
+civilization's destroyers.
+
+
+I have specified some of the twentieth century's inventions to show
+that, like the compass and the printing-press, they will be scatterers
+of privileges to the masses. I might go on indefinitely adding to the
+list, but I will cite only one more. It was only in the last decade of
+the nineteenth century that a new way of making cheap paper was
+discovered--so cheap that it became possible to sell great dailies for
+one cent. But this practice was not established until the twentieth
+century. And it was only a few years ago that the greatest newspaper of
+the world--and a very stronghold of upper-class monopoly--was able, or
+driven, to reduce its price from threepence (six cents) to a penny. But
+I specify the case of the London _Times_ because, like a miracle of
+divine healing, but entirely due to the cheapness of paper, is the
+change of its policy from that of brutal imperialism to the democratic
+one of transforming the British Empire into a commonwealth of equal
+states. Now that the _Times_ has been converted, we may be sure that
+the universe itself has come round to the side of the right, and has
+taken up the cause of the poor. By the pricking of my thumbs I know
+that something better than civilization this way comes. Dull indeed
+must be that man whose blood does not tingle with anticipation. Yet the
+physical inventions of the twentieth century are not to be compared in
+pregnancy of good with its less palpable, its spiritual, novelties.
+
+
+
+
+XX. AGAINST THE MATERIALISTIC VIEW OF HISTORY
+
+
+Before passing, however, from the physical inventions to the new moral
+ideas and mental contacts, I must interpolate a comment to save myself
+from misunderstanding. Generally, those who trace to mechanical
+utilities new epochs in the development of mankind proceed upon the
+materialistic theory of history. But this theory I have in no wise
+committed myself to, for I count it to be false. It is true that I have
+traced all the great steps in human advancement to physical inventions,
+but I have in no word implied that the inventions themselves were
+caused by anything material whatsoever. And if they themselves were, as
+I believe, the result of man's mental and spiritual activities reacting
+against events, then my tracing of human advancement to them implies no
+belief in the materialistic theory of history. Every effect of the
+inventions must be set down ultimately not to them, but to their
+causes; and their causes were mental. Casually I have said as much, in
+remarking several times that they took place by a happy chance, or by a
+stroke of insight on the part of some rare genius, or by the reaction
+of some mediocre person's intelligent volition against some
+extraordinary experience which made the idea of the invention so
+obtrusively evident that even a mind not unusually gifted could
+scarcely have avoided lighting upon it.
+
+The only phrase I have used by which I cannot absolutely stand is the
+expression "by a happy chance"; for I believe that the mental
+productions of each person are due not to uncaused chance, or to
+accident, but to trends of the social mind that have been set in motion
+by mental exigencies arising out of current events. As primitive
+peoples, however, have left no record of their mental sequences, we
+cannot say with confidence what were the exact experiences that led to
+the idea of using fire, or to any other device that transformed the
+relation of human beings to one another or to their material habitat. I
+only repeat that whatever caused the inventions caused all the remote
+effects of these, and that if the causes of the inventions were mental
+and spiritual, then an interpretation of history is not materialistic
+merely because it traces advancement to mechanical utilities. That I am
+right in tracing these to mental and spiritual causes is proved at
+least in the case of recent inventions. For we know that their causes
+were psychic; we know the mental atmosphere, and how it arose, that
+brought forth the telephone and aeroplane and submarine. We know that
+these were not due to physical necessities or to any material causes.
+They arose from the brooding of creative imaginations disciplined in a
+method learned by reflection upon former successes in discovery. We
+also know in what main particulars this modern atmosphere differs from
+that of former centuries. But such questions are not germane to my
+central theme, and so I pass them over lightly. Let me then return
+without further delay from this digression which has been made in the
+interests, not of my argument, but of my self-respect as a student of
+social facts.
+
+
+
+
+XXI. CONTACT OF PEOPLES
+
+
+Consider, for instance, that at the beginning of our century, for the
+first time in more than fifteen hundred years, the Christian nations
+came into contact with a mighty pagan power, and were compelled to
+acknowledge it as not only a political, but a moral, equal. Whoever
+knows the magical effect in the quickening of intellectual and
+spiritual life due to new contact with a contrasting type of national
+culture will agree that the meeting thus of Christendom with the
+so-called "heathen" world is a fact of prime significance in the
+history of man.
+
+Nor is it simply the contact of heathen and Christian on terms of moral
+equality. There is another aspect to Japan's ascendancy and her
+recognition by the West. The East and the West meet at last. The
+psychic invasion of each by the other must be epoch-making and in the
+direction of the completeness and unification spiritually of all
+mankind in a brotherhood of nations and nation-states. The new contact
+of heathen and Christian, and of white and colored, of East and West,
+means that the exploitation of the dark races by nations more highly
+organized on a basis of self-interest is about to cease forever. With
+the humanization of the West will come the salvation of those tribes
+who never divided themselves so absolutely into the "haves" and the
+"have-nots," or who never attained a high mastery over the physical
+universe.
+
+Are there persons in America who say what, until the present war, many
+in Old England thought--that there is nothing new under the sun? Then I
+would call their attention to the unprecedented and revolutionary
+character of the contact in the United States, on a basis of relative
+political and social equality, of immigrants from some fifty-one
+different nations of the Old World. These people will mix their blood,
+their temperaments, and their traditions, and not only will a new
+variety of human being emerge, but the mixing of opposites in idea and
+temperament will quicken self-consciousness and heighten mental power
+and speed up its activity. The opportunity of the blond beasts of prey
+has lain in the torpor and inactivity and ignorance of the multitude.
+But I find no torpor in California. And where there is no one that will
+allow himself to be preyed upon, even blond beasts take up the new
+enterprise of co-operation among equals. This is an inevitable result
+of the contact of many varieties of unlikes, the unification, not of
+equals, but of supplementary equivalents. When such psychic conditions
+have prevailed for a century or more, it is inconceivable that trade
+can continue to consist of competition between individuals and the
+permission of the successful to amass and hoard fortunes. Either
+production and distribution will become communal, or the community will
+tax large fortunes into the state and national treasury.
+
+But there are three other distinguishing characteristics of the
+twentieth century which make for the replacing of civilization by
+humanization, and for the transition of trade from the harshness of the
+law into the abounding grace of the gospel.
+
+
+
+
+XXII. THE POWER TO TRANSMIT HUMAN LIFE, ITS SOCIAL CONTROL
+
+
+First, the limiting of population by the will of human individuals. In
+the beginning men stole fire from the gods; but life they allowed the
+Almighty to continue to dispense at his own inscrutable pleasure, while
+they remained his pleased but puzzled agents in its transmission. It
+was only in the eighties of the last century, after a hundred thousand
+years, that man hit upon the idea and the practice of controlling life
+as he had controlled fire. From the beginning, he had planted the
+fire-seed according to his own purpose and social need. And now at last
+he has come to look upon the life-seed as not simply in his keeping as
+a trust for another, but as his own property to control in the interest
+of his own future. Can human audacity reach higher? Can the assumption
+of divine and creative responsibility by man out-strip this latest act
+of self-government? From beast to citizen, did we say? But have we not
+found the process during the last four hundred years to be from
+citizenship to godship, from creature to creator? It was one of your
+American reformers who entitled a book _Man as Social Creator_. From
+beast to citizen seemed dull enough; but from citizen to God--what
+intoxication of zest does this thought engender! Can the creature dare
+it? Is this the great venture? Is this the meaning of the travail of
+the ages? Or is it only a process from citizen to man, from tamed beast
+to free spirit feeling the Soul of All at the inmost centre of himself,
+and finding the means at last of incarnating that soul in the
+community, in politics, trade, and domestic life? Howsoever the new
+facts and the newer outlook are to be interpreted, it becomes quite
+clear that if civilization was the taming of beasts, something that is
+not civilization has begun to assert itself. The liberating of
+citizens, as it moves to triumphant attainment, must scrap many an
+institution, many a habit, and set up the reverse of many a rule of
+conduct. We have indeed reached a new era, one which is not that of
+taming animals, when young women can--and know that they can--as
+war-brides strike against the labor of maternity and against the
+foreseen horror of a fate for one's offspring such as they would never
+choose for the fruit of their love.
+
+
+But, secondly, close upon the invention of means for controlling the
+transmission of life has followed the idea that this control shall not
+rest with the individuals most intimately concerned, but with the will
+of the community--of the nation--of federated humanity. If a man has no
+exclusive right to do as he pleases with his power of labor, to
+withhold it or direct it irrespective of the general welfare and the
+will of the commonweal, how much less, say the advocates of eugenic
+marriage, shall men and women be permitted to follow their own whim and
+their selfish pleasure as regards the use or waste of the power to
+communicate life? This new doctrine that men are only trustees for the
+nation and posterity in their central power to control the future
+quantity and quality of human beings whom they may bring into
+existence, recognizes no division of society into the tamed and the
+tamers. There is no class suggested of monopolists of social power who
+will regulate the rest of the community, as the owner of cattle
+controls the breeding of them. The general will of the community,
+administered under diffused public opinion and through the educated
+judgment of the individual himself, will decide. Only in cases of what
+are agreed to be downright crimes will the law step in to condemn and
+prevent, and then only through agents who are directly accountable to
+an enlightened and alert public opinion. The retaining of this new
+mastery of man over the quantity and quality of human life, by the
+communal conscience against all monopolists, is the transcendent
+feature of the new order. But if this be so, then trade, our system of
+producing and distributing wealth, ceases to be merely a question of
+the control of labor and becomes a question of the control of the
+transmission of human life. Such control might have been accounted a
+possible privilege among Virginian breeders of slaves. But so to regard
+it seems monstrous, now that chattel slavery has been universally
+condemned, thanks to the triumphant levellers of the last hundred
+years. What is more, all trade is beginning to be regarded as a
+question ultimately, not of the manufacture of machines and their
+products, nor of the propagation of plants and animals, but of the
+begetting of spiritual agents, who in their turn are to become the
+makers and masters of the universe in which they are to live.
+
+
+The third characteristic event of our century which is to help us to
+slough off civilization, as our ancestors ten thousand years ago rid
+themselves of the wild-beast features of barbarism and savagery, is the
+awakening of women. Their claim to social initiative and responsibility
+is the extremest possible reach of democratic self-assertion. The
+remarkable peculiarity of their entrance into trade is not, however,
+that they are women, but that they are the one half of mankind who have
+never worked for hire, but always from love, and who have desired the
+wage less than the approval of those they served. The morals of trade,
+as it has existed under the relation of master to wage-earner, even the
+ethics of trades-unionism, cannot survive the censure of women, who on
+other principles demand for themselves the right of maintenance by the
+state to protect them in the bearing and rearing of children and the
+making of homes, and the nursing of the wounded and the sick. Now that
+women no longer allow themselves as social agents to be ignored, they
+will insist that not only the morals of marriage and of democratic
+relations must become humane, but that all trade, as well as all
+legislation, must be guided by the eugenic motive.
+
+
+
+
+XXIII. FOREIGN TRADE THE BEGETTER OF WARS
+
+
+I have presumed to say that modern trade discloses civilization in its
+acutest form. The strict sobriety of this assertion we cannot, perhaps,
+appreciate to the full, unless we note the relation of trade during the
+last three hundred years to aggressive warfare. There prevails in the
+public mind the false notion that somehow peace and trade are akin in
+spirit and identical in their interests. This notion has been
+assiduously foisted upon the public by kings of industry and some
+professors of sociology, who possibly believe that it is true. But the
+facts of history prove that every great war during the last three
+centuries has been undertaken in the service of foreign traders, who
+call upon their government to back their claims. According to Sir John
+Seeley, the greatest political historian of the British Empire, foreign
+trade and modern war have always been one and the same thing. Some
+small nation-state resented the advent and methods of the foreign
+traders, and began to prepare for self-defence, asserting that it
+wished to be left alone, and that it meant to defend its own sacred
+traditions. This the government that backed the traders would not
+permit, and a clash of arms ensued. Or two rival sets of foreigners
+were jealous of each other in their effort to possess one and the same
+market and induced their respective governments to spring at each
+other's throats. Under such circumstances war does not always arise,
+because the mere show of vastly superior might is often sufficient to
+compel immediate submission. Such was the case when the United States
+in 1853 exhibited in the harbors of bewildered and terrified Japan a
+fleet of great steamships. The threatened nation, having admitted no
+foreigners since the Jesuits in the seventeenth century plotted against
+its political independence, and not knowing how to use steam to propel
+engines, saw that there was no alternative to violent conquest by their
+uninvited guests but peaceful submission on their own part.
+
+Such peace, however, is not the holy thing which some persons declare
+all peace to be. When a man holds up his hands in answer to the
+challenge of a highway robber, bloodshed is avoided; but the outrage is
+none the less detestable because perfect quiet prevails. Nor is it the
+kind of social calm which the angels meant when they proclaimed peace
+on earth to men of good will. On the contrary, it is that stillness of
+unchallenged iniquity of which our Lord expressed his menacing hate
+when He declared that He came not to bring peace but a sword. Trade
+illustrates civilization in its highest degree of intelligence and
+elaboration; and foreign trade is only trade in its widest
+transactions. But foreign trade being the cause of all war, the only
+way to end warfare is to displace civilization by a system of wealth
+produced and distributed under communal control. Then commerce will no
+longer be inspired by the financial interest of private investors, but
+by the total welfare of the whole people of the nation. But I have
+touched upon the identity of war and trade only to show their vital
+connection with civilization as a whole.
+
+
+
+
+XXIV. THE OPPOSITE OF A "RETURN TO NATURE"
+
+
+Civilization is still advancing by leaps and bounds. Nevertheless, at
+the same time, with a greater acceleration of development, the men are
+checkmating the master and transferring control and initiative to the
+will of the commonwealth. At least, not otherwise am I able to
+interpret the new deference for nationality which has been aroused in
+protest against aggressive militarism; nor the kind of industrial
+legislation that has been enacted during the last decade in California
+and other western states, in New Zealand and Australia, and even in
+Italy and England. It all means that the new inventions, although at
+first seized upon by monopolists, are seen to be such as to provide
+channels through which the pent-up instincts and hopes of the masses
+can act with concerted power. It means that also political machinery is
+being devised for securing the public welfare and protecting
+opportunities for individual genius and talent. No man asks for more.
+The world over we have reached the threshold of collective democracy,
+wherein the consuming of material wealth will be shared with
+approximate equality and wherein social control will be retained by the
+collective will, to safeguard individual initiative, and will be
+administered by public servants who have proved their superior ability,
+but who remain subject to almost instantaneous recall.
+
+Such a substitute for civilization, however, is the opposite of a
+return to the individualism of Nature or to a primeval communism. It
+presupposes the highest mastery of man over matter and social unity
+among all mankind co-operating as nation-states and federations of
+states.
+
+As regards external government and law, it is the antithesis of Mr.
+Carpenter's proposal that they should disappear, because they are the
+travesty of inward government and order. On the contrary, I hope that
+external government, animated by the general will of a social
+democratic commonwealth and vested in representatives sensitively
+accountable to an alert and intelligent public opinion, will appear to
+my listeners not as a travesty, but as the very incarnation of that
+inward government and order which every individual man must feel to be
+the law of his own being unless he has lost his manhood's centrality. A
+crushing indictment of Mr. Carpenter's modern movement back to Nature
+is to be found in the fact that it has declined instead of advancing
+during the twenty-six years since he wrote. Probably fewer persons in
+England preach salvation by sandals and sunbaths to-day than did a
+quarter of a century ago, while the sandals themselves and sunbaths
+have become but items among the general products of industry and
+governmental hygiene. The sunbath is only one of the many remedies
+prescribed to the poor by doctors impanelled by the British state, and
+the sandals are better made by machinery than by the hands of poetic
+hermits.
+
+But while the vision of philosophical anarchy has been fading away,
+whole nations on a gigantic scale have been subjecting the power of
+trusts and monopolies to the general will of the community. In America
+you have changed your federal law and many of your state constitutions,
+in order that the right of the common will to dictate may be
+unquestioned, and that no occasion for lawless violence need ever arise
+through any legal barrier to the full assertion of the mind of the
+common life.
+
+So in every particular of his cure for civilization Mr. Carpenter's
+worship of savagery and barbarism is being rejected as fantastic. We
+may return to uncooked fruits and grains. But what a task for the most
+highly developed industrial state, to raise and distribute an adequate
+supply of grapes, apples, and nuts the year round for the 1,000,000,000
+inhabitants of the globe! What a call for many wizards of California to
+produce new species of luscious edibles! It would seem to me that the
+curse of civilization has lain in the direction of too little of either
+cooked or uncooked food, instead of too much. If the common people are
+to come into their own, trade in every necessity and luxury must be
+more highly integrated. The difference of the new era as regards
+foreign commerce will chiefly be that nations as a whole by their
+governments will conduct it instead of private traders. In other words,
+foreign trade will be nationalized, in the way that social democrats
+have long demanded that land and capital should be. The community will
+own and control it through state agents for the common welfare. Nothing
+of good which civilization has brought forth will be lost, nor will the
+organization of wealth be relaxed.
+
+Machinery will be multiplied a thousandfold. Like the human body
+itself, social life must become as complex as it can without losing its
+centrality. Be it remembered that the truly simple life is not gained
+by meagreness of possessions and interests, but by singleness of aim
+controlling a seemingly infinite number of detailed means. But this
+unity dominating a multiplicity of interests is attainable only through
+the entire mechanism of external government. And again, as the man
+resides in all the organs of the body, but is himself no organ, and as
+by the central unity of his life-energy is able to rush the white
+corpuscles to any part that is wounded or poisoned, so the general
+will, the community-self of the social democratic state, is beginning
+to direct all the healing agencies in the body politic to the rescue of
+the unfortunate. Such beneficence and benevolence, systematized and
+alert, is more than civilization. It is Christianity, it is the doing
+unto the least of one's fellow-men what self-interest prompts one never
+to do; but its power is equal to the redemptive goodness that inspires
+it. In motive and method it is not business, it is different from
+trade; for it is a progeny of pity. But nevertheless, it is socialized
+wealth and applied science and politics. It is government by the
+governed.
+
+
+When civilization has been superseded by this democratic process, which
+in our century is advancing at such rapid gait, there will surely be in
+the sphere of religion no more return to Nature than in that of
+economics. There will be no more the worship of any one instinct or
+organ, or any external object or agent. How could Carpenter have so far
+forgotten his own definition of health as to applaud the primitive
+ritualistic worship of the glories of the human body and the procession
+of the stars? That ritual was itself the symptom of the break-up of
+man's character into multiplicity, and the insubordination of specific
+organs. Surely when man has gained centrality of health, he will
+worship the unifying will which is dominant whenever health prevails.
+He will adore the spirit which makes the many one. But men will never
+gain that centrality of health until they have established this worship
+of the one heart that beats in every human breast and, being inspired
+with religious passion for it, have brought the entire economic order
+into conformity with its behests.
+
+
+_The Riverside Press_
+CAMBRIDGE · MASSACHUSETTS
+U · S · A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's Is civilization a disease?, by Stanton Coit
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IS CIVILIZATION A DISEASE? ***
+
+***** This file should be named 29639-8.txt or 29639-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/2/9/6/3/29639/
+
+Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
+generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian
+Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.