summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/29554-h/29554-h.htm
blob: a1cd6be644fc180e50d97e58b837b51564b6d813 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
    <title>
      The Project Gutenberg eBook of /X, by AUTHOR.
    </title>
    <style type="text/css">

    p {  margin-top: .75em;
         text-align: justify;
         margin-bottom: .75em;
         text-indent: 1em;
         }
    p.noindent  {text-indent: 0em;}
    p.titlepage {text-indent: 0em; text-align: center; }

    h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
         text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
         clear: both;
         }
    .chapterhead {margin-top: 4em; font-weight: normal;}

    hr { width: 33%;
	 margin-top: 2em;
	 margin-bottom: 2em;
         margin-left: auto;
         margin-right: auto;
         clear: both;
       }
    .chapbreak {width: 65%; }
    .decshort {width: 3em; border: solid black 1px; }

    table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
    td    {padding-left: 0.5em; padding-right: 0.5em; vertical-align: top;}
    .tdr  {text-align: right;}

    body{margin-left: 10%;
         margin-right: 10%;
        }

    .pagenum  { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
            /*  visibility: hidden;  */
                position: absolute;
                left: 92%;
                font-size: smaller;
                font-style: normal;
                font-weight: normal;
                font-variant: normal;
                text-align: right;
                text-indent: 0em;
              } /* page numbers */

    .smcap    {font-variant: small-caps;}

    .footnotes    {border-top: solid 1px; text-indent: 0.5em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align: justify; }
    .label        {font-size: 80%; vertical-align: 0.2em; }
    .fnanchor     {vertical-align: 0.3em; font-size: .8em; padding-left: 0.1em;}

    ins.correction {text-decoration:none; border-bottom: thin dotted gray;}

    .tn           {background-color: #EEE; padding: 0.5em 1em 0.5em 1em;}

    .poem         {padding-left: 20%; padding-right: 10%; text-align: left; text-indent: 0em;}

    </style>
  </head>
<body>


<pre>

Project Gutenberg's An Ethnologist's View of History, by Daniel G. Brinton

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org


Title: An Ethnologist's View of History
       An Address Before the Annual Meeting of the New Jersey
              Historical Society, at Trenton, New Jersey, January 28, 1896

Author: Daniel G. Brinton

Release Date: July 31, 2009 [EBook #29554]

Language: English

Character set encoding: UTF-8

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ETHNOLOGIST'S VIEW OF HISTORY ***




Produced by Julia Miller and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)






</pre>


<div class="tn">
<p class="titlepage"><b>Transcriber&#8217;s Note</b></p>

<p class="noindent">A number of typographical errors have been maintained in this version of
this book. They are <ins class="correction" title="correction">marked</ins> and the corrected text is shown in the popup.
A description of the errors is found in the <a href="#trans_note">list</a> at the end of the text.</p>
</div>

<hr class="chapbreak" />
<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p>





<h1 class="chapterhead" style="line-height: 1.5em;"><span style="font-size: smaller;">AN</span><br />

<span class="smcap">Ethnologist’s View of History.</span></h1>

<hr class="decshort" />

<p class="titlepage"><span style="font-size: 120%;">AN ADDRESS</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 60%;">BEFORE THE</span><br />
<span class="smcap">Annual Meeting of the New Jersey Historical Society</span>,<br />
<span style="font-size: 60%;">AT</span><br />
<span class="smcap">Trenton, New Jersey, January 28, 1896</span>.</p>

<hr class="decshort" />

<p class="titlepage"><span style="font-size: 60%;">BY</span><br />

DANIEL G. BRINTON, A. M., M. D., LL. D., D. Sc.</p>

<p class="titlepage" style="font-size: 90%;"><span class="smcap">Professor of American Arch&aelig;ology in the University of<br />
Pennsylvania and of General Ethnology at the<br />
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</span></p>

<hr class="decshort" />

<p class="titlepage">PHILADELPHIA, PA.<br />
1896.</p>

<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span></p>

<hr class="chapbreak" />
<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span></p>



<h2 class="chapterhead">An Ethnologist’s View of History.</h2>

<hr class="decshort" />

<p><span class="smcap">Mr. President</span>:</p>

<p class="titlepage" style="letter-spacing: 1em;">* * * * * * *</p>

<p>The intelligent thought of the world is ever advancing to a fuller
appreciation of the worth of the past to the present and the future.
Never before have associations, societies and journals devoted to
historical studies been so numerous. All times and tribes are searched
for memorials; the remote corners of modern, medieval and ancient
periods are brought under scrutiny; and going beyond these again, the
semi-historic eras of tradition and the nebulous gleams from
pre-historic <a name="corr01" id="corr01"></a><ins class="correction" title="millenniums">milleniums</ins> are diligently scanned, that their
uncertain story may be prefaced to that registered in “the syllables of
recorded time.”</p>

<p>In this manner a vast mass of material is accumulating with which the
historian has to deal. What now is the real nature of the task he sets
before himself? What is the mission with which he is entrusted?</p>

<p>To understand this task, to appreciate that mission, he must ask himself
the broad questions: What is the aim of history? What are the purposes
for which it should be studied and written?</p>

<p>He will find no lack of answers to these inquiries, all offered with
equal confidence, but singularly discrepant among themselves. His
<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span>embarrassment will be that of selection between widely divergent views,
each ably supported by distinguished advocates.</p>

<p>As I am going to add still another, not exactly like any already on the
list, it may well be asked of me to show why one or other of those
already current is not as good or better than my own. This requires me
to pass in brief review the theories of historic methods, or, as it is
properly termed, of the Philosophy of History, which are most popular
to-day.</p>

<p>They may be classified under three leading opinions, as follows:</p>

<p>1. History should be an accurate record of events, and nothing more; an
exact and disinterested statement of what has taken place, concealing
nothing and coloring nothing, reciting incidents in their natural
connections, without bias, prejudice, or didactic application of any
kind.</p>

<p>This is certainly a high ideal and an excellent model. For many, yes,
for the majority of historical works, none better can be suggested. I
place it first and name it as worthiest of all current theories of
historical composition. But, I would submit to you, is a literary
production answering to this precept, really <i>History</i>? Is it anything
more than a well-prepared annal or chronicle? Is it, in fact anything
else than a compilation containing the materials of which real history
should be composed?</p>

<p>I consider that the mission of the historian, taken in its completest
sense, is something much more, much higher, than the collection and
narration of events, no matter how well this is done. The historian
should be like the man of science, and group his facts under inductive
systems so as to reach the general laws which connect and explain them.
He should, still further, be like the artist, and endeavor so to exhibit
these connections under literary forms that they present to the reader
the impression of a symmetrical and organic unity, in which each part or
<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span>event bears definite relations to all others. Collection and collation
are not enough. The historian must “work up his field notes,” as the
geologists say, so as to extract from his data all the useful results
which they are capable of yielding.</p>

<p>I am quite certain that in these objections I can count on the suffrages
of most. For the majority of authors write history in a style widely
different from that which I have been describing. They are distinctly
teachers, though not at all in accord as to what they teach. They are
generally advocates, and with more or less openness maintain what I call
the second theory of the aim of history, to wit:</p>

<p>2. History should be a collection of evidence in favor of certain
opinions.</p>

<p>In this category are to be included all religious and political
histories. Their pages are intended to show the dealings of God with
man; or the evidences of Christianity, or of one of its sects,
Catholicism or Protestantism; or the sure growth of republican or of
monarchial institutions; or the proof of a divine government of the
world; or the counter-proof that there is no such government; and the
like.</p>

<p>You will find that most general histories may be placed in this class.
Probably a man cannot himself have very strong convictions about
politics or religion, and not let them be seen in his narrative of
events where such questions are prominently present. A few familiar
instances will illustrate this. No one can take either Lingard’s or
Macauley’s History of England as anything more than a plea for either
writer’s personal views. Gibbon’s anti-Christian feeling is as
perceptibly disabling to him in many passages as in the church
historians is their search for “acts of Providence,” and the hand of God
in human affairs.</p>

<p>All such histories suffer from fatal flaws. They are de<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span>ductive instead
of inductive; they are a <i>defensio sententiarum</i> instead of an
<i>investigatio veri</i>; they assume the final truth as known, and go not
forth to seek it. They are therefore “teleologic,” that is, they study
the record of man as the demonstration of a problem the solution of
which is already known. In this they are essentially “divinatory,”
claiming foreknowledge of the future; and, as every ethnologist knows,
divination belongs to a stadium of incomplete intellectual culture, one
considerably short of the highest. As has been well said by Wilhelm von
Humboldt, any teleologic theory “disturbs and falsifies the facts of
history;”<a name="FNanchor_6-1_1" id="FNanchor_6-1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_6-1_1" class="fnanchor">6-1</a> and it has been acutely pointed out by the philosopher
Hegel, that it contradicts the notion of progress and is no advance over
the ancient tenet of a recurrent cycle.<a name="FNanchor_6-2_2" id="FNanchor_6-2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_6-2_2" class="fnanchor">6-2</a></p>

<p>I need not dilate upon these errors. They must be patent to you. No
matter how noble the conviction, how pure the purpose, there is
something nobler and purer than it, and that is, unswerving devotion to
rendering in history the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth.</p>

<p>I now turn to another opinion, that which teaches that&mdash;</p>

<p>3. History should be a portraiture, more or less extended, of the
evolution of the human species.</p>

<p>This is claimed to be the “scientific” view of history. It was tersely
expressed by Alexander von Humboldt in the phrase: “The history of the
world is the mere expression of a predetermined, that is, fixed,
evolution.”<a name="FNanchor_6-3_3" id="FNanchor_6-3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_6-3_3" class="fnanchor">6-3</a></p>

<p>It is that advocated by Auguste Comte, Draper and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span> Spencer, and a few
years ago Prof. Gerland, of Strasburg, formulated its basic maxim in
these words: “Man has developed from the brute through the action of
purely mechanical, therefore fixed, laws.”<a name="FNanchor_7-1_4" id="FNanchor_7-1_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_7-1_4" class="fnanchor">7-1</a></p>

<p>The scientist of to-day who hesitates to subscribe to these maxims is
liable to be regarded as of doubtful learning or of debilitated
intellect. I acknowledge that I am one such, and believe that I can show
sound reasons for denying the assumption on which this view is based.</p>

<p>It appears to me just as teleologic and divinatory as those I have
previously named. It assumes Evolution as a law of the universe, whereas
in natural science it is only a limited generalization, inapplicable to
most series of natural events, and therefore of uncertain continuance in
any series. The optimism which it inculcates is insecure and belongs to
deductive, not inductive, reasoning. The mechanical theory on which it
is based lacks proof, and is, I maintain, insufficient to explain
motive, and, therefore, historic occurrences. The assumption that
history is the record of a necessary and uninterrupted evolution,
progressing under ironclad mechanical laws, is a preconceived theory as
detrimental to clear vision as are the preoccupations of the theologian
or the political partisan.</p>

<p>Any definition of evolution which carries with it the justification of
optimism is as erroneous in history, as it would be in biology to assert
that all variations are beneficial. There is no more certainty that the
human species will improve under the operation of physical laws than
that any individual will; there is far more evidence that it will not,
as every species of the older geologic ages has succumbed to those laws,
usually without leaving a representative.</p>

<p>I am aware that I am here in opposition to the popular<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span> as well as the
scientific view. No commonplace is better received than that, “Eternal
progress is the law of nature;” though by what process eternal laws are
discovered is imperfectly explained.</p>

<p>Applied to history, a favorite dream of some of the most recent teachers
is that the life of the species runs the same course as that of one of
its members. Lord Acton, of Oxford, in a late lecture states that: “The
development of society is like that of individual;”<a name="FNanchor_8-1_5" id="FNanchor_8-1_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_8-1_5" class="fnanchor">8-1</a> and Prof.
Fellows, of the University of Chicago, advances the same opinion in the
words, “Humanity as a whole <a name="corr02" id="corr02"></a><ins class="correction" title="develops">developes</ins> like a child.”<a name="FNanchor_8-2_6" id="FNanchor_8-2_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_8-2_6" class="fnanchor">8-2</a></p>

<p>The error of this view was clearly pointed out some years ago by Dr.
Tobler.<a name="FNanchor_8-3_7" id="FNanchor_8-3_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_8-3_7" class="fnanchor">8-3</a> There has been no growth of humanity at large at all
comparable to that of the individual. There are tribes to-day in the
full stone age, and others in all stages of culture above it. The
horizons of progress have been as local as those of geography. No
solidarity of advancement exists in the species as a whole. Epochs and
stadia of culture vary with race and climate. The much talked of “law of
continuity” does not hold good either in national or intellectual
growth.</p>

<p>Such are the criticisms which may be urged against the historical
methods now in vogue. What, you will ask, is offered in their stead?
That which I offer is the view of the ethnologist. It is not so
ambitious as some I have named. It does not deal in eternal laws, nor
divine the distant future. The ethnologist does not profess to have been
admitted into the counsels of the Almighty, nor to have caught in his
grasp the secret purposes of the Universe. He seeks the sufficient
reason for known facts, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span> is content with applying the knowledge he
gains to present action.</p>

<p>Before stating the view of the ethnologist, I must briefly describe what
the science of Ethnology is. You will see at once how closely it is
allied to history, and that the explanation of the one almost carries
with it the prescription for the other.</p>

<p>It begins with the acknowledged maxim that man is by nature a gregarious
animal, a <i>zoon politikon</i>, as Aristotle called him, living in society,
and owing to society all those traits which it is the business of
history, as distinguished from biology, to study.</p>

<p>From this standpoint, all that the man is he owes to others; and what
the others are, they owe, in part, to him. Together, they make up the
social unit, at first the family or clan, itself becoming part of a
larger unit, a tribe, nation or people. The typical folk, or <i>ethnos</i>,
is a social unit, the members of which are bound together by certain
traits common to all or most, which impart to them a prevailing
character, an organic unity, specific peculiarities and general
tendencies.</p>

<p>You may inquire what these traits are to which I refer as making up
ethnic character. The answer cannot be so precise as you would like. We
are dealing with a natural phenomenon, and Nature, as Goethe once
remarked, never makes groups, but only individuals. The group is a
subjective category of our own minds. It is, nevertheless,
psychologically real, and capable of definition.</p>

<p>The <i>Ethnos</i> must be defined, like a species of natural history, by a
rehearsal of a series of its characteristics, not by one alone. The
members of this series are numerous, and by no means of equal
importance; I shall mention the most prominent of them, and in the order
in which I believe they should be ranked for influence on national
character.</p>

<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span>First, I should rank Language. Not only is it the medium of intelligible
intercourse, of thought-<a name="corr03" id="corr03"></a><ins class="correction" title="transference,">tranference,</ins> but thought itself is
powerfully aided or impeded by the modes of its expression in sound. As
“spoken language,” in poetry and oratory, its might is recognized on all
hands; while in “written language,” as literature, it works silently but
with incalculable effect on the character of a people.<a name="FNanchor_10-1_8" id="FNanchor_10-1_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_10-1_8" class="fnanchor">10-1</a></p>

<p>Next to this I should place Government, understanding this word in its
widest sense, as embracing the terms on which man agrees to live with
his fellow man and with woman, family, therefore, as well as society
ties. This includes the legal standards of duty, the rules of
relationship and descent, the rights of property and the customs of
commerce, the institutions of castes, classes and rulers, and those
international relations on which depend war and peace. I need not
enlarge on the profound impress which these exert on the traits of the
people.<a name="FNanchor_10-2_9" id="FNanchor_10-2_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_10-2_9" class="fnanchor">10-2</a></p>

<p>After these I should name Religion, though some brilliant scholars, such
as Schelling and Max M&uuml;ller,<a name="FNanchor_10-3_10" id="FNanchor_10-3_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10-3_10" class="fnanchor">10-3</a> have claimed for it the first place
as a formative influence on ethnic character. No one will deny the
prominent rank it holds in the earlier stages of human culture. It is
scarcely too much to say that most of the waking hours of the males of
some tribes are taken up with religious ceremo<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span>nies. Religion is,
however, essentially “divinatory,” that is, its chief end and aim is
toward the future, not the present, and therefore the impress it leaves
on national character is far less permanent, much more ephemeral, than
either government or language. This is constantly seen in daily life.
Persons change their religion with facility, but adhere resolutely to
the laws which protect their property. The mighty empire of Rome secured
ethnic unity to a degree never since equalled in parallel circumstances,
and its plan was to tolerate all religions&mdash;as, indeed, do all
enlightened states to-day&mdash;but to insist on the adoption of the Roman
law, and, in official intercourse, the Latin language. I have not
forgotten the converse example of the Jews, which some attribute to
their religion; but the Romany, who have no religion worth mentioning,
have been just as tenacious of their traits under similar adverse
circumstances.</p>

<p>The Arts, those of Utility, such as pottery, building, agriculture and
the domestication of animals, and those of Pleasure, such as music,
painting and sculpture, must come in for a full share of the
ethnologist’s attention. They represent, however, stadia of culture
rather than national character. They influence the latter materially and
are influenced by it, and different peoples have toward them widely
different endowments; but their action is generally indirect and
unequally distributed throughout the social unit.</p>

<p>These four fields, Language, Government, Religion and the Arts, are
those which the ethnologist explores when he would render himself
acquainted with a nation’s character; and now a few words about the
methods of study he adopts, and the aims, near or remote, which he keeps
in view.</p>

<p>He first gathers his facts, from the best sources at his command, with
the closest sifting he can give them, so as to exclude errors of
observation or intentional bias. From<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span> the facts he aims to discover on
the above lines what are or were the regular characteristics of the
people or peoples he is studying. The ethnic differences so revealed are
to him what organic variations are to the biologist and morphologist;
they indicate evolution or retrogression, and show an advance toward
higher forms and wider powers, or toward increasing feebleness and
decay.</p>

<p>To understand them they must be studied in connection and causation.
Hence, the method of the ethnologist becomes that which in the natural
sciences is called the “developmental” method. It may be defined as the
historic method where history is lacking. The biologist explains the
present structure of an organ by tracing it back to simpler forms in
lower animals until he reaches the germ from which it began. The
ethnologist pursues the same course. He selects, let us say, a peculiar
institution, such as caste, and when he loses the traces of its origin
through failure of written records, he seeks for them in the survivals
of unwritten folk-lore, or in similar forms in primitive conditions of
culture.</p>

<p>Here is where Arch&aelig;ology renders him most efficient aid. By means of it
he has been able to follow the trail of most of the arts and
institutions of life back to a period when they were so simple and
uncomplicated that they are quite transparent and intelligible. Later
changes are to be analyzed and explained by the same procedure.<a name="FNanchor_12-1_11" id="FNanchor_12-1_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_12-1_11" class="fnanchor">12-1</a></p>

<p>This is the whole of the ethnologic method. It is open and easy when the
facts are in our possession. There are no secret springs, no occult
forces, in the historic development of culture. Whatever seems hidden or
mysterious, is so only because our knowledge of the facts is imperfect.
No magic and no miracle has aided man in his long con<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span>flict with the
material forces around him. No ghost has come from the grave, no God
from on high, to help him in the bitter struggle. What he has won is his
own by the right of conquest, and he can apply to himself the words of
the poet:</p>

<p class="poem">“Hast du nicht alles selbst vollendet,<br />
Heilig gl&uuml;hend Herz?” (<i>Goethe</i>).</p>

<p>Freed from fear we can now breathe easily, for we know that no <i>Deus ex
machina</i> meddles with those serene and mighty forces whose adamantine
grasp encloses all the phenomena of nature and of life.</p>

<p>The ethnologist, however, has not completed his task when he has defined
an <i>ethnos</i>, and explained its traits by following them to their
sources. He has merely prepared himself for a more delicate and
difficult part of his undertaking.</p>

<p>It has been well said by one of the ablest ethnologists of this
generation, the late Dr. Post, of Bremen, that “The facts of ethnology
must ever be regarded as the expressions of the general consciousness of
Humanity.”<a name="FNanchor_13-1_12" id="FNanchor_13-1_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_13-1_12" class="fnanchor">13-1</a> The time has passed when real thinkers can be satisfied
with the doctrines of the positive philosophers, who insisted that
events and institutions must be explained solely from the phenomenal or
objective world, that is, by other events.</p>

<p>Sounder views prevail, both in ethnology and its history. “The history
of man,” says a German writer, “is neither a divine revelation, nor a
process of nature; it is first and above all, the work of man;”<a name="FNanchor_13-2_13" id="FNanchor_13-2_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13-2_13" class="fnanchor">13-2</a> an
opinion reiterated by Prof. Flint in his work on the philosophy of
history in these<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span> words: “History is essentially the record of the work
and manifestation of <i>human nature</i>.”<a name="FNanchor_14-1_14" id="FNanchor_14-1_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14-1_14" class="fnanchor">14-1</a> In both sciences it is the
essentially human which alone occupies us; it is the <i>life of man</i>.</p>

<p>Now men do not live in material things, but in mental states; and solely
as they affect these are the material things valuable or valueless.
Religions, arts, laws, historic events, all have but one standard of
appraisement, to wit, the degree to which they produce permanently
beneficial mental states in the individuals influenced by them. All must
agree to this, though they may differ widely as to what such a mental
state may be; whether one of pleasurable activity, or that of the
Buddhist hermit who sinks into a trance by staring at his navel, or that
of the Trappist monk whose occupations are the meditation of death and
digging his own grave.</p>

<p>The ethnologist must make up his own mind about this, and with utmost
care, for if his standard of merit and demerit is erroneous, his
results, however much he labors on them, will have no permanent value.
There are means, if he chooses to use them, which will aid him here.</p>

<p>He must endeavor to picture vividly to himself the mental condition
which gave rise to special arts and institutions, or which these evolved
in the people. He must ascertain whether they increased or diminished
the joy of living, or stimulated the thirst for knowledge and the love
of the true and the beautiful. He must cultivate the liveliness of
imagination which will enable him to transport himself into the epoch
and surroundings he is studying, and feel on himself, as it were, their
peculiar influences. More than all, chief of all, he must have a broad,
many-sided, tender sympathy with all things human, enabling him to
appreciate the emotions and arguments of all parties and all peoples.</p>

<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span>Such complete comprehension and spiritual accord will not weaken, but
will strengthen his clear perception of those standards by which all
actions and institutions must ultimately be weighed and measured. There
are such standards, and the really learned ethnologist will be the last
to deny or overlook them.</p>

<p>The saying of Goethe that “The most unnatural action is yet natural,” is
a noble suggestion of tolerance; but human judgment can scarcely go to
the length of Madame de Stael’s opinion, when she claims that “To
understand all actions is to pardon all.” We must brush away the
sophisms which insist that all standards are merely relative, and that
time and place alone decide on right and wrong. Were that so, not only
all morality, but all science and all knowledge were fluctuating as
sand. But it is not so. The principles of Reason, Truth, Justice and
Love have been, are, and ever will be the same. Time and place, race and
culture, make no difference. Whenever a country is engaged in the
diffusion of these immortal verities, whenever institutions are
calculated to foster and extend them, that country, those institutions,
take noble precedence over all others whose efforts are directed to
lower aims.<a name="FNanchor_15-1_15" id="FNanchor_15-1_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15-1_15" class="fnanchor">15-1</a></p>

<p>Something else remains. When the ethnologist has acquired a competent
knowledge of his facts, and deduced from them a clear conception of the
mental states of the peoples he is studying, he has not finished his
labors. Institutions and arts in some degree reflect the mental
conditions of a people, in some degree bring them about; but<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span> the
underlying source of both is something still more immaterial and
intangible, yet more potent, to wit, Ideas and Ideals. These are the
primary impulses of conscious human endeavor, and it is vain to attempt
to understand ethnology or to write history without assigning their
consideration the first place in the narration.</p>

<p>I am anxious to avoid here any metaphysical obscurity. My assertion is,
that the chief impulses of nations and peoples are abstract ideas and
ideals, unreal and unrealizable; and that it is in pursuit of these that
the great as well as the small movements on the arena of national life
and on the stage of history have taken place.</p>

<p>You are doubtless aware that this is no new discovery of mine. Early in
this century Wilhelm von Humboldt wrote: “The last and highest duty of
the historian is to portray the effort of the Idea to attain realization
in fact;” and the most recent lecture on the philosophy of history which
I have read, that by Lord Acton, contains this maxim: “Ideas which in
religion and politics are truths, in history are living forces.”</p>

<p>I do claim that it is timely for me to repeat these doctrines and to
urge them with vehemence, for they are generally repudiated by the
prevailing schools of ethnology and history in favor of the opinion that
objective, mechanical influences alone suffice to explain all the
phenomena of human life. This I pronounce an inadequate and an
unscientific opinion.</p>

<p>There is in living matter everywhere something which escapes the most
exhaustive investigation, some subtle center of impulse, which lies
beyond the domain of correlated energy, and which acts directively,
without increasing or diminishing the total of that energy. Also in the
transformations of organic forms, there are preparations and propulsions
which no known doctrine of the mechanical, natural causes can interpret.
We must accept the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span> presence of the same powers, and in a greater
degree, in the life and the history of man.<a name="FNanchor_17-1_16" id="FNanchor_17-1_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_17-1_16" class="fnanchor">17-1</a></p>

<p>It may be objected that abstract ideas are far beyond the grasp of the
uncultivated intellect. The reply is, consciously to regard them as
abstract, may be; but they exist and act for all that. All sane people
think and talk according to certain abstract laws of grammar and logic;
and they act in similar unconsciousness of the abstractions which impel
them. Moreover, the Idea is usually clothed in a concrete Ideal, a
personification, which brings it home to the simplest mind. This was
long ago pointed out by the observant Machiavelli in his statement that
every reform of a government or religion is in the popular mind
personified as the effort of one individual.</p>

<p>In every nation or <i>ethnos</i> there is a prevailing opinion as to what the
highest typical human being should be. This “Ideal of Humanity,” as it
has been called, is more or less constantly and consciously pursued, and
becomes a spur to national action and to a considerable degree an
arbiter of national destiny. If the ideal is low and bestial, the course
of that nation is downward, self-destroying; if it is lofty and pure,
the energies of the people are directed toward the maintenance of those
principles which are elevating and preservative. These are not
mechanical forces, in any rational sense of the term; but they are
forces the potent directive and formative influence of which cannot be
denied and must not be underestimated.</p>

<p>Just in proportion as such ideas are numerous, clear and true in the
national mind, do their power augment and their domain extend; just so
much more quickly and firmly do they express themselves, in acts, forms
and institutions, and thus enable the nation to enrich, beautify and
strengthen its own existence. We have but to glance<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span> along the nations
of the world and to reflect on the outlines of their histories, to
perceive the correctness of the conclusion which Prof. Lazarus, perhaps
the most eminent analyst of ethnic character of this generation, reaches
in one of his essays: “A people which is not rich in ideas, is never
rich; one that is not strong in its thinking powers, is never
strong.”<a name="FNanchor_18-1_17" id="FNanchor_18-1_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_18-1_17" class="fnanchor">18-1</a></p>

<p>I claim, therefore, that the facts of ethnology and the study of racial
psychology justify me in formulating this maxim for the guidance of the
historian: <i>The conscious and deliberate pursuit of ideal aims is the
highest causality in human history.</i></p>

<p>The historian who would fulfil his mission in its amplest sense must
trace his facts back to the ideas which gave them birth; he must
recognize and define these as the properties of specific peoples; and he
must estimate their worth by their tendency to national preservation or
national destruction.</p>

<p>This is the maxim, the axiom, if you please, which both the ethnologist
and the historian must bear ever present in mind if they would
comprehend the meaning of institutions or the significance of events.
They must be referred to, and explained by, the ideas which gave them
birth. As an American historian has tersely put it, “The facts relating
to successive phases of <i>human thought</i> constitute History.”<a name="FNanchor_18-2_18" id="FNanchor_18-2_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18-2_18" class="fnanchor">18-2</a></p>

<p>I am aware that a strong school of modern philosophers will present the
objection that thought itself is but a necessary result of chemical and
mechanical laws, and therefore that it cannot be an independent cause.
Dr. Post has pointedly expressed this position in the words: “We do<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span> not
think; thinking goes on within us,”<a name="FNanchor_19-1_19" id="FNanchor_19-1_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19-1_19" class="fnanchor">19-1</a> just as other functions, such
as circulation and secretion, go on.</p>

<p>It is not possible for me at this time to enter into this branch of the
discussion. But I may ask your attention to the fact that one of the
highest authorities on the laws of natural science, the late George J.
Romanes, reached by the severest induction an exactly opposite opinion,
which he announced in these words: “The human mind is itself a causal
agent. Its motives are in large part matters of its own creation. *&nbsp;*&nbsp;*
Intelligent volition is a true cause of adjustive movement.”<a name="FNanchor_19-2_20" id="FNanchor_19-2_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_19-2_20" class="fnanchor">19-2</a></p>

<p>For myself, after what I have endeavored to make an unbiased study of
both opinions, I subscribe unhesitatingly to the latter, and look upon
Mind not only as a potent but as an independent cause of motion in the
natural world, of action in the individual life, and, therefore, of
events in the history of the species.</p>

<p>Confining ourselves to ethnology and history, the causative idea, as I
have said, makes itself felt through ethnic ideals. These are
influential in proportion as they are vividly realized by the national
genius; and elevating in proportion as they partake of those final
truths already referred to, which are all merely forms of expression of
right reasoning. These ideals are the <i>idola fori</i>, which have sometimes
deluded, sometimes glorified, those who believed in them.</p>

<p>I shall mention a few of them to make my meaning more apparent.</p>

<p>That with which we are most familiar in history is the warrior ideal,
the personification of military glory and martial success. It is present
among the rudest tribes, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span> that it is active to-day, events in recent
European history prove only too clearly; and among ourselves, little
would be needed to awaken it to vivid life.</p>

<p>We are less acquainted with religious ideals, as they have weakened
under the conditions of higher culture. They belong in European history
more to the medieval than to the modern period. Among Mohammedans and
Brahmins we can still see them in their full vigor. In these lower
faiths we can still find that intense fanaticism which can best be
described by the expression of Novalis, “intoxicated with God,” drunk
with the divine;<a name="FNanchor_20-1_21" id="FNanchor_20-1_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_20-1_21" class="fnanchor">20-1</a> and this it is which preserves to these nations
what power they still retain.</p>

<p>Would that I could claim for our own people a grander conception of the
purpose of life than either of these. But alas! their ideal is too
evident to be mistaken. I call it the “divitial” ideal, that of the rich
man, that which makes the acquisition of material wealth the one
standard of success in life, the only justifiable aim of effort. To most
American citizens the assertion that there is any more important, more
sensible purpose than this, is simply incomprehensible or incredible.</p>

<p>In place of any of these, the man who loves his kind would substitute
others; and as these touch closely on the business of the ethnologist
and the historian when either would apply the knowledge he has gained to
the present condition of society, I will briefly refer to some advanced
by various writers.</p>

<p>The first and most favorite is that of <i>moral perfection</i>. It has been
formulated in the expression: “In the progress of ethical conceptions
lies the progress of history itself.” (Sch&auml;fer.) To such writers the
ideal of duty performed transcends all others, and is complete in
itself. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span> chief end of man, they say, is to lead the moral life,
diligently to cultivate the ethical perception, the notion of “the
ought,” and to seek in this the finality of his existence.<a name="FNanchor_21-1_22" id="FNanchor_21-1_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_21-1_22" class="fnanchor">21-1</a></p>

<p>Keener thinkers have, however, recognized that virtue, morality, the
ethical evolution, cannot be an end in itself, but must be a means to
some other end. Effort directed toward other, altruism in any form, must
have its final measurement of value in terms of self; otherwise the
immutable principles of justice are attacked. I cannot enlarge upon this
point, and will content myself with a reference to Prof. Steinthal’s
admirable essay on “The Idea of ethical Perfection,” published some
years ago.<a name="FNanchor_21-2_23" id="FNanchor_21-2_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_21-2_23" class="fnanchor">21-2</a> He shows that in its last analysis the Good has its
value solely in the freedom which it confers. Were all men truly
ethical, all would be perfectly free. Therefore Freedom, in its highest
sense, according to him and several other accomplished reasoners, is the
aim of morality, and is that which gives it worth.</p>

<p>This argument seems to me a step ahead, but yet to remain incomplete.
For after all, what is freedom? It means only opportunity, not action;
and opportunity alone is a negative quantity, a zero. Opportunity for
what, I ask?</p>

<p>For an answer, I turn with satisfaction to an older writer on the
philosophy of history, one whose genial sympathy with the human heart
glows on every page of his volumes, to Johann Gottfried von
Herder.<a name="FNanchor_21-3_24" id="FNanchor_21-3_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_21-3_24" class="fnanchor">21-3</a> The one final aim, he tells us, of all institutions, laws,
governments and religions,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span> of all efforts and events, is that each
person, undisturbed by others, may employ his own powers to their
fullest extent, and thus gain for himself a completer existence, a more
beautiful enjoyment of his faculties.</p>

<p>Thus, to the enriching of the individual life, its worth, its happiness
and its fullness, does all endeavor of humanity tend; in it, lies the
end of all exertion, the reward of all toil; to define it, should be the
object of ethnology; and to teach it, the purpose of history.</p>

<p>Let me recapitulate.</p>

<p>The ethnologist regards each social group as an entity or individual,
and endeavors to place clearly before his mind its similarities and
differences with other groups. Taking objective facts as his guides,
such as laws, arts, institutions and language, he seeks from these to
understand the mental life, the psychical welfare of the people, and
beyond this to reach the ideals which they cherished and the ideas which
were the impulses of their activities. Events and incidents, such as are
recorded in national annals, have for him their main, if not only value,
as indications of the inner or soul life of the people.</p>

<p>By the comparison of several social groups he reaches wider
generalizations; and finally to those which characterize the common
consciousness of Humanity, the psychical universals of the species. By
such comparison he also ascertains under what conditions and in what
directions men have progressed most rapidly toward the cultivation and
the enjoyment of the noblest elements of their nature; and this strictly
inductive knowledge is that alone which he would apply to furthering the
present needs and aspirations of social life.</p>

<p>This is the method which he would suggest for history in the broad
meaning of the term. It should be neither a mere record of events, nor
the demonstration of a thesis, but a study, through occurrences and
institutions, of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span> mental states of peoples at different epochs,
explanatory of their success or failure, and practically applicable to
the present needs of human society.</p>

<p>Such explanation should be strictly limited in two directions. First, by
the principle that man can be explained only by man, and can be so
explained completely. That is, no super-human agencies need be invoked
to interpret any of the incidents of history: and, on the other hand, no
merely material or mechanical conditions, such as climate, food and
environment, are sufficient for a full interpretation. Beyond these lie
the inexhaustible sources of impulse in the essence of Mind itself.</p>

<p>Secondly, the past can teach us nothing of the future beyond a vague
surmise. All theories which proceed on an assumption of knowledge
concerning finalities, whether in science or dogma, are cobwebs of the
brain, not the fruit of knowledge, and obscure the faculty of
intellectual perception. It is wasteful of one’s time to frame them, and
fatal to one’s work to adopt them.</p>

<p>These are also two personal traits which, it seems to me, are requisite
to the comprehension of ethnic psychology, and therefore are desirable
to both the ethnologist and the historian. The one of these is the
poetic instinct.</p>

<p>I fear this does not sound well from the scientific rostrum, for the
prevailing notion among scientists is that the poet is a fabulist, and
is therefore as far off as possible from the platform they occupy. No
one, however, can really understand a people who remains outside the
pale of the world of imagination in which it finds its deepest joys; and
nowhere is this depicted so clearly as in its songs and by its bards.
The ethnologist who has no taste for poetry may gather much that is
good, but will miss the best; the historian who neglects the poetic
literature of a nation turns away his eyes from the vista which would
give him the farthest insight into national character.</p>

<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span>The other trait is more difficult to define. To apprehend what is
noblest in a nation one must oneself be noble. Knowledge of facts and an
unbiased judgment need to be accompanied by a certain development of
personal character which enables one to be in sympathy with the finest
tissue of human nature, from the fibre of which are formed heroes and
martyrs, patriots and saints, enthusiasts and devotees. To appreciate
these something of the same stuff must be in the mental constitution of
the observer.</p>

<p>Such is the ethnologist’s view of history. He does not pretend to be
either a priest or a prophet. He claims neither to possess the final
truth nor to foresee it. He is, therefore equally unwelcome to the
dogmatist, the optimistic naturalist and the speculative philosopher. He
refuses any explanations which either contradict or transcend human
reason; but he insists that human reason is one of the causal facts
which he has to consider; and this brings him into conflict with both
the mystic and the materialist.</p>

<p>Though he exalts the power of ideas, he is no idealist, but practical to
the last degree; for he denies the worth of any art, science, event or
institution which does not directly or indirectly contribute to the
elevation of the individual man or woman, the common average person, the
human being.</p>

<p>To this one end, understanding it as we best can, he claims all effort
should tend; and any other view than this of the philosophy of history,
any other standard of value applied to the records of the past, he looks
upon as delusive and deceptive, no matter under what heraldry of title
or seal of sanctity it is offered.</p>


<div class="footnotes">

<p><a name="Footnote_6-1_1" id="Footnote_6-1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6-1_1"><span class="label">6-1</span></a> In his epochal essay “Die Aufgabe des
Geschichtschreibers.” <i>Gesammelte Werke</i>, Bd. I., s. 13. It was
republished with a discriminating introduction by Professor Steinthal in
<i>Die Sprachphilosophischen Werke Wilhelm von Humboldt’s</i> (Berlin,
1883).</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_6-2_2" id="Footnote_6-2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6-2_2"><span class="label">6-2</span></a> “Der Zweck-Begriff bewirkt nur sich selbst, und ist am
Ende was er im Anfange, in der Unspr&uuml;nglichkeit, war.” <i>Encyclop&auml;die der
philosophischen Wissenschaften.</i> <a name="corr04" id="corr04"></a><ins class="correction" title="Theil">Theil,</ins> I., &sect; 204.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_6-3_3" id="Footnote_6-3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6-3_3"><span class="label">6-3</span></a> “Die Weltgeschichte ist der blosse Ausdruck einer
vorbestimmten Entwicklung.” (Quoted by Lord Acton.)</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_7-1_4" id="Footnote_7-1_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7-1_4"><span class="label">7-1</span></a> “Die Menschheit hat sich aus nat&uuml;rlicher, tierischer
Grundlage auf rein nat&uuml;rliche mechanische Weise entwickelt.”
<i>Anthropolgische Beitr&auml;ge</i>, s. 21.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_8-1_5" id="Footnote_8-1_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8-1_5"><span class="label">8-1</span></a> <i>A Lecture on the Study of History</i>, p. 1 (London,
1895).</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_8-2_6" id="Footnote_8-2_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8-2_6"><span class="label">8-2</span></a> See his article “The Relation of Anthropology to the
Study of History,” in <i>The American Journal of Sociology</i>, July, 1895.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_8-3_7" id="Footnote_8-3_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8-3_7"><span class="label">8-3</span></a> Ludwig Tobler, in his article “Zur Philosophie der
Geschichte,” in the <i>Zeitschrift f&uuml;r V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i>, Bd. XII., s.
195.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_10-1_8" id="Footnote_10-1_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10-1_8"><span class="label">10-1</span></a> One of the most lucid of modern German philosophical
writers says, “Without language, there could be no unity of mental life,
no national life at all.” Friedrich Paulsen, <i>Introduction to
Philosophy</i>, p. 193. (English translation, New York, 1895.) I need
scarcely recall to the student that this was the cardinal principle of
the ethnological writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt, and that his most
celebrated essay is entitled “Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen
Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des
Menschengeschlechts.” The thought is well and tersely put by Prof. Frank
Granger&mdash;“Language is the instinctive expression of national spirit.”
(<i>The Worship of the Romans</i>, p. 19, London, 1896.)</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_10-2_9" id="Footnote_10-2_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10-2_9"><span class="label">10-2</span></a> “Law, in its positive forms, may be viewed as an
instrument used to produce a certain kind of character.” Frank Granger,
ubi supra, p. 19.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_10-3_10" id="Footnote_10-3_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10-3_10"><span class="label">10-3</span></a> <i>Lectures on the Science of Religion</i>, p. 55.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_12-1_11" id="Footnote_12-1_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12-1_11"><span class="label">12-1</span></a> How different from the position of Voltaire, who,
<a name="corr05" id="corr05"></a><ins class="correction" title="expressing">expressing,</ins> the general sentiment of his times, wrote,&mdash;“The
history of barbarous nations has no more interest than that of bears and
wolves!”</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_13-1_12" id="Footnote_13-1_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13-1_12"><span class="label">13-1</span></a> <i>Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz</i>, Bd. I., s.
5. (Leipzig, 1894.)</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_13-2_13" id="Footnote_13-2_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13-2_13"><span class="label">13-2</span></a> “Das Geschichte ist weder eine Offenbarung Gottes, noch
ein Naturprocess, sondern eben Menschenwerk.” Tobler in the <i>Zeitschrift
f&uuml;r V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i>, Bd. XII., s. 201.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_14-1_14" id="Footnote_14-1_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14-1_14"><span class="label">14-1</span></a> <i>History of the Philosophy of History</i>, p. 579.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_15-1_15" id="Footnote_15-1_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15-1_15"><span class="label">15-1</span></a> There is nothing in this inconsistent with the principle
laid down by Lecky: “The men of each age must be judged by the ideal of
their own age and country, and not by the ideal of ourselves.”&mdash;<i>The
Political Value of History</i>, p. 50, New York, 1892. The distinction is
that between the relative standard, which we apply to motives and
persons, and the absolute standard, which we apply to actions. The
effects of the latter, for good or evil, are fixed, and independent of
the motives which prompt them.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_17-1_16" id="Footnote_17-1_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17-1_16"><span class="label">17-1</span></a> “The historian,” says Tolstoi, “is obliged to admit an
inexplicable force, which acts upon his elementary forces.” <i>Power and
Liberty</i>, p. 28 (Eng. Trans., New York, 1888).</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_18-1_17" id="Footnote_18-1_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18-1_17"><span class="label">18-1</span></a> See his article “Ueber die Ideen in der Geschichte,” in
the <i>Zeitschrift f&uuml;r V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i><a name="corr06" id="corr06"></a><ins class="correction" title=",">.</ins> Bd. III., S. 486.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_18-2_18" id="Footnote_18-2_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18-2_18"><span class="label">18-2</span></a> Brooks Adams, <i>The Law of Civilization and Decay</i>,
Preface (London, 1895). This author has reached an advanced position
with reference to thought and emotion as the impulses of humanity.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_19-1_19" id="Footnote_19-1_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19-1_19"><span class="label">19-1</span></a> <i>Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz</i>, Band I., s.
4.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_19-2_20" id="Footnote_19-2_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19-2_20"><span class="label">19-2</span></a> <i>Mind and Motion</i>, pp. 29, 140, etc. (London, 1895.)
Prof. Paulsen goes much further, as, “The inner disposition
spontaneously determines the development of the individual,” and “The
organism is, as it were, congealed voluntary action.”&mdash;<i>Introduction to
Philosophy</i>, <a name="corr07" id="corr07"></a><ins class="correction" title="pp.">pp,</ins> 187, 190.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_20-1_21" id="Footnote_20-1_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20-1_21"><span class="label">20-1</span></a> Before him, however, the expression “ebrius Deo” was
applied to the ancient rhapsodists.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_21-1_22" id="Footnote_21-1_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21-1_22"><span class="label">21-1</span></a> As expressed by Prof. Droysen, in his work, <i>Principles
of History</i>, (p. 16, New York, 1893), recently translated by President
Andrews, of Brown University&mdash;“Historical things are the perpetual
actualization of the moral forces.” Elsewhere he says&mdash;“History is
humanity becoming conscious concerning itself<a name="corr08" id="corr08"></a><ins class="correction" title=".">,</ins>” There is no
objection to such expressions; they are good as far as they go; but they
do not go to the end.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_21-2_23" id="Footnote_21-2_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21-2_23"><span class="label">21-2</span></a> In the <i>Zeitschrift f&uuml;r V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i>, Band XI.,
Heft II.</p>

<p><a name="Footnote_21-3_24" id="Footnote_21-3_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21-3_24"><span class="label">21-3</span></a> <i>Ideen zur Geschichte der Menschheit</i>, B. XV., Cap. I.</p>
</div>



<hr class="chapbreak" />

<div class="tn">
<p class="titlepage"><a name="trans_note" id="trans_note"></a><b>Transcriber&rsquo;s&nbsp;Note</b></p>

<p class="noindent">The following errors and inconsistencies have been maintained.</p>

<p class="noindent">Misspelled words and typographical errors:</p>

<table style="margin-left: 0;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="typos">
<tr>
  <td class="tdr">Page</td>
  <td>Error</td>
  <td>Correction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr01">3</a></td>
  <td>milleniums</td>
  <td>millenniums</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr02">8</a></td>
  <td>developes</td>
  <td>develops</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr03">10</a></td>
  <td>thought-tranference,</td>
  <td>thought-transference</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr04">fn. 6-2</a></td>
  <td>Theil,</td>
  <td>Theil</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr05">fn. 12-1</a></td>
  <td>expressing,</td>
  <td>expressing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr06">fn. 18-1</a></td>
  <td><i>V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i>.</td>
  <td><i>V&ouml;lkerpsychologie</i>,</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr07">fn. 19-2</a></td>
  <td>pp,</td>
  <td>pp.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td class="tdr"><a href="#corr08">fn. 21-1</a></td>
  <td>itself,”</td>
  <td>itself.”</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>








<pre>





End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Ethnologist's View of History, by 
Daniel G. Brinton

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ETHNOLOGIST'S VIEW OF HISTORY ***

***** This file should be named 29554-h.htm or 29554-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        https://www.gutenberg.org/2/9/5/5/29554/

Produced by Julia Miller and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)


Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.



*** START: FULL LICENSE ***

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
https://gutenberg.org/license).


Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.


Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.


Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
https://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at https://pglaf.org

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director
     gbnewby@pglaf.org


Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit https://pglaf.org

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
donations.  To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate


Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.


Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.


Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:

     https://www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.


</pre>

</body>
</html>