diff options
Diffstat (limited to '27196-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 27196-h/27196-h.html | 5042 |
1 files changed, 5042 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/27196-h/27196-h.html b/27196-h/27196-h.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f9c7360 --- /dev/null +++ b/27196-h/27196-h.html @@ -0,0 +1,5042 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /><link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" /><meta name="DC.Creator" content="Joshua Leavitt" /><meta name="DC.Title" content="Cheap Postage" /><meta name="DC.Date" content="November 7, 2008" /><meta name="DC.Language" content="English" /><meta name="DC.Publisher" content="Project Gutenberg" /><meta name="DC.Identifier" content="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/27196" /><meta name="DC.Rights" content="This text is in the public domain." /><title>The Project Gutenberg EBook of Cheap Postage by Joshua Leavitt</title><style type="text/css">/* +The Gnutenberg Press - default CSS2 stylesheet + +Any generated element will have a class "tei" and a class "tei-elem" +where elem is the element name in TEI. +The order of statements is important !!! +*/ + +.tei { margin: 0; padding: 0; + font-size: 100%; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal } + +.block { display: block; } +.inline { display: inline; } +.floatleft { float: left; margin: 1em 2em 1em 0; } +.floatright { float: right; margin: 1em 0 1em 2em; } +.shaded { margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + padding: 1em; background-color: #eee; } +.boxed { margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + padding: 1em; border: 1px solid black; } + +body.tei { margin: 4ex 10%; text-align: justify } +div.tei { margin: 2em 0em } +p.tei { margin: 0em 0em 1em 0em; text-indent: 0em; } +blockquote.tei { margin: 2em 4em } + +div.tei-lg { margin: 1em 0em; } +div.tei-l { margin: 0em; text-align: left; } +div.tei-tb { text-align: center; } +div.tei-epigraph { margin: 0em 0em 1em 10em; } +div.tei-dateline { margin: 1ex 0em; text-align: right } +div.tei-salute { margin: 1ex 0em; } +div.tei-signed { margin: 1ex 0em; text-align: right } +div.tei-byline { margin: 1ex 0em; } + + /* calculate from size of body = 80% */ +div.tei-marginnote { margin: 0em 0em 0em -12%; width: 11%; float: left; } + +div.tei-sp { margin: 1em 0em 1em 2em } +div.tei-speaker { margin: 0em 0em 1em -2em; + font-weight: bold; text-indent: 0em } +div.tei-stage { margin: 1em 0em; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic } +span.tei-stage { font-weight: normal; font-style: italic } + +div.tei-eg { padding: 1em; + color: black; background-color: #eee } + +hr.doublepage { margin: 4em 0em; height: 5px; } +hr.page { margin: 4em 0em; height: 2px; } + +ul.tei-index { list-style-type: none } + +dl.tei { margin: 1em 0em } + +dt.tei-notelabel { font-weight: normal; text-align: right; + float: left; width: 3em } +dd.tei-notetext { margin: 0em 0em 1ex 4em } + +span.tei-pb { position: absolute; left: 1%; width: 8%; + font-style: normal; } + +span.code { font-family: monospace; font-size: 110%; } + +ul.tei-castlist { margin: 0em; list-style-type: none } +li.tei-castitem { margin: 0em; } +table.tei-castgroup { margin: 0em; } +ul.tei-castgroup { margin: 0em; list-style-type: none; + padding-right: 2em; border-right: solid black 2px; } +caption.tei-castgroup-head { caption-side: right; width: 50%; text-align: left; + vertical-align: middle; padding-left: 2em; } +*.tei-roledesc { font-style: italic } +*.tei-set { font-style: italic } + +table.rules { border-collapse: collapse; } +table.rules caption, +table.rules th, +table.rules td { border: 1px solid black; } + +table.tei { border-collapse: collapse; } +table.tei-list { width: 100% } + +th.tei-head-table { padding: 0.5ex 1em } + +th.tei-cell { padding: 0em 1em } +td.tei-cell { padding: 0em 1em } + +td.tei-item { padding: 0; font-weight: normal; + vertical-align: top; text-align: left; } +th.tei-label, +td.tei-label { width: 3em; padding: 0; font-weight: normal; + vertical-align: top; text-align: right; } + +th.tei-label-gloss, +td.tei-label-gloss { text-align: left } + +td.tei-item-gloss, +th.tei-headItem-gloss { padding-left: 4em; } + +img.tei-formula { vertical-align: middle; } + +</style></head><body class="tei"> + + + + + + + + +<div lang="en" class="tei tei-text" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em" xml:lang="en"> + <div class="tei tei-front" style="margin-bottom: 6.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"> + <div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + <div id="pgheader" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em"><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em">The Project Gutenberg EBook of Cheap Postage by Joshua Leavitt</p></div><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost + and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, + give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project + Gutenberg License <a href="#pglicense" class="tei tei-ref">included with this + eBook</a> or online at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/license</a></p></div><pre class="pre tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em">Title: Cheap Postage + +Author: Joshua Leavitt + +Release Date: November 7, 2008 [Ebook #27196] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHEAP POSTAGE*** +</pre></div> + </div> + <div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + + </div> + + <hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.73em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHEAP POSTAGE</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.44em"><span style="font-size: 144%">REMARKS AND STATISTICS</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.20em"><span style="font-size: 120%">ON THE SUBJECT OF</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.73em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHEAP POSTAGE AND POSTAL REFORM</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.20em"><span style="font-size: 120%">IN</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.44em"><span style="font-size: 144%">GREAT BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES.</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.73em"><span style="font-size: 173%">BY JOSHUA LEAVITT,</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.20em"><span style="font-size: 120%">COR. SEC. OF THE CHEAP POSTAGE ASSOCIATION.</span></p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-q" style="text-align: center">“The well-ordering of the Postes is a Matter + of General Concernment, and of Great Advantage, as + well for the preservation of Trade and + Commerce as otherwise.”</span>—Statute of + Charles II.</p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em">Boston</p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em">Published for the Cheap Postage Association;</p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em">By Otis Claps, Treasurer,</p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em">No. 12, School Street.</p> + <p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em">1848</p> + </div> + <hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + <h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Contents</span></h1> + <ul class="tei tei-index tei-index-toc"><li><a href="#toc1">PUBLISHING DIRECTION.</a></li><li><a href="#toc3">CHEAP POSTAGE.</a></li><li><a href="#toc5">APPENDIX.</a></li><li><a href="#toc7">Footnotes</a></li></ul> + </div> + + </div> +<div class="tei tei-body" style="margin-bottom: 6.00em; margin-top: 6.00em"> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page002">[pg 002]</span><a name="Pg002" id="Pg002" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> +<a name="toc1" id="toc1"></a> +<a name="pdf2" id="pdf2"></a> +<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">PUBLISHING DIRECTION.</span></h1> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Subjoined are the proceedings under which the following sheets were prepared +and are now published: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“At a meeting of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Board of Directors</span></span> of the +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Cheap Postage Association</span></span>, on +the 31st of March, 1848, Dr. Howe, Dr. Webb, and Mr. Leavitt were appointed a +Committee of Publication. And on motion of Dr. Samuel G. Howe, it was</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Voted</span></span>, That the Publishing +Committee be authorized to procure the compilation +of a pamphlet on the subject of Cheap Postage and Postal Reform.</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“At a meeting of the Board, on the 25th of +April, 1848, Mr. Leavitt, the Corresponding +Secretary, on behalf of the Publishing Committee, reported the copy of a +pamphlet on the subject prescribed. And on motion of Mr. Moses Kimball, it was</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Voted</span></span>, That the pamphlet be +printed for general circulation, under the direction +of the Publishing Committee.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">J. W. James</span></span>,<br /> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Chairman of the Board</span></span>. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Charles B. Fairbanks</span></span>, +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Recording Secretary</span></span>. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Boston</span></span>, April 26, 1848. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +BOSTON:<br /> +PRINTED BY FREEMAN AND BOLLES,<br /> +DEVONSHIRE STREET. +</p> + +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page003">[pg 003]</span><a name="Pg003" id="Pg003" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> +<a name="toc3" id="toc3"></a> +<a name="pdf4" id="pdf4"></a> +<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHEAP POSTAGE.</span></h1> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +For more than eight years, the people of Great Britain have enjoyed +the blessing of Cheap Postage. A literary gentleman of England, +in a letter to his friend in Boston, dated London, March 23, +1848, says—<span class="tei tei-q">“Our Post Office Reform is our greatest measure for +fifty years, not only political, but educational for the English mind +and affections. If you had any experience of the exquisite convenience +of the thing, your speech would wax eloquent to advocate +it. With your increasing population, a similar measure must soon +pay; and it will undoubtedly increase the welfare and +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">solidarité</span></span> of +the United States.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Mr. Laing, a writer of eminence, said four years ago, <span class="tei tei-q">“This measure +will be the great historical distinction of the reign of Victoria I. +Every mother in the kingdom, who has children earning their bread +at a distance, lays her head upon her pillow at night with a feeling of +gratitude for this blessing.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +An American gentleman, writing from London, in 1844, says, <span class="tei tei-q">“It is +hardly possible to overrate the value of this [cheap postage] in regard +to the exertion of moral power. At a trifling expense one can carry +on a correspondence with all parts of the kingdom. It saves time, +facilitates business, and brings kindred minds in contact. How long +will our enlightened government adhere to its absurd system?”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The London Committee, who got up a national testimonial for Mr. +Rowland Hill, speak of cheap postage as <span class="tei tei-q">“a measure which has +opened the blessings of free correspondence to the teacher of religion, +the man of science and literature, the merchant and trader, and the +whole British nation, especially to the poorest and most defenceless +portion of it—a measure which is <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">the greatest boon conferred in +modern times on all the social interests of the civilized world</span></em>.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The unspeakable benefits conferred by cheap postage upon the +people, are equalled by its complete success as a governmental measure. +The gross receipts of the British Post-office had remained about +stationary for thirty years, ranging always in the neighborhood of two +millions and a quarter sterling. In the year 1839, the last year of the +old system, the gross income was £2,390,763. In the year 1847, +under the new system, it was £1,978,293, that is, only £413,470 +short of the receipts under the old system. A letter from Mr. Joseph +Hume, M. P., to Dr. Thomas H. Webb, of Boston, dated London, +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page004">[pg 004]</span><a name="Pg004" id="Pg004" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +March 3, 1848, says, <span class="tei tei-q">“I am informed by the General Post-office, +that the gross revenue this year will equal, it is expected, the gross +amount of the postage in the year before the postage was reduced.”</span> +Mr. Hume also encloses a tabular statement of the increase of letters, +together with a copy of the Parliamentary return, made the present +year, showing the fiscal condition and continued success of the Post-office. +He sends also, a copy of a note which he had just written +to Mr. Bancroft, our Minister at the Court of St. James, as follows: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +(COPY.) +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Bry. Square, 2d March, 1848. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">My Dear Sir</span></span>, +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I have the pleasure to send you the copy of a paper I have prepared, at the +request of Mr. Webb, of Boston, to show the progress of increase of the number of +letters by the post-office here, since the reduction of the postage, and I hope it may +induce your government to adopt the same course. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I am not aware of any reform, amongst the many reforms that I have promoted +during the last forty years, that has had, and will have better results towards the +improvement of this country, morally, socially and commercially. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I wish as much as possible that the communication by letters, newspapers and +pamphlets, should pass between the United States and Great Britain as between +Great Britain and Ireland, as the intercommunication of knowledge and kindly +feelings must be the result, tending to the promotion of friendly intercourse, and to +maintain peace, so desirable to all countries. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Any further information on this subject shall be freely and with pleasure supplied +by, yours, sincerely, +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +(Signed) JOSEPH HUME. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +His Excellency George Bancroft. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +MR. HUME'S TABLE. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Estimate of the number of chargeable Letters delivered in the +United Kingdom in each year, from</span></span> 1839 <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">to</span></span> +1847.<a id="noteref_1" name="noteref_1" href="#note_1"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1</span></span></a> +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="4"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Year.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Number of Letters.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Annual Increase.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Increase per cent.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">Millions.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Millions.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">on the No. for 1839.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1839.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">76<a id="noteref_2" name="noteref_2" href="#note_2"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">2</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">169</td><td class="tei tei-cell">93</td><td class="tei tei-cell">123</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">196-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">27-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">36</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">208-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">12</td><td class="tei tei-cell">16</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">220-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">12</td><td class="tei tei-cell">16</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">242</td><td class="tei tei-cell">21-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">28</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1845.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">271-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">29-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">39</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1846.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">299-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">28</td><td class="tei tei-cell">37</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1847.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">322</td><td class="tei tei-cell">22-½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">30</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The most important of the tables contained in the parliamentary +return will be given in the appendix, either entire, or so as to present +the material results in their official form. The contents of that document +have not, to my knowledge, been in any manner brought before +the people of the United States. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is humiliating to think, that while a system fraught with so many +blessings has been so long in operation, and with such signal success +as a financial measure, in a country with which our relations are +so intimate, I should now begin to prepare the first pamphlet for publication, +designed to give the American people full information on the +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page005">[pg 005]</span><a name="Pg005" id="Pg005" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +subject; this publication being the first effort of the first regularly +organized society, now just formed, for the purpose of securing the +same blessings to the citizens of this republic, which the British Parliament +enacted, after full investigation, nine years ago. If we look at +the various political questions which have already in those eight years +grown <span class="tei tei-q">“obsolete,”</span> after occupying the public mind and engrossed the +cares of our statesmen, to the exclusion of the great subject of cheap +postage, and consider their comparative importance, we shall be satisfied +that it is now high time for a determined effort to satisfy the +people of the United States with regard to the utility and practicability +of cheap postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Prior to the year 1840 the postal systems of Great Britain and the +United States were constructed on similar principles, and the rates of +postage were nearly alike. Both were administered with a special +view to the amount of money that could be realized from postage. In +Great Britain, the surplus of receipts above the cost of administration +was carried to the general treasury. In the United States, the surplus +received in the North was employed in extending mail facilities to the +scattered inhabitants of the South and West. In Great Britain, private +mails and other facilities had kept the receipts stationary for +twenty years, while the population of the country had increased thirty +per cent., and the business and intelligence and wealth of the country +in a much greater ratio. In the United States, there was a constant +increase of postage, although by a less ratio than the increase of population, +until the year 1843, when, through the establishment of private +mails, the gross receipts actually fell off, and it became apparent that +the old system had failed, and could never be reinvigorated so as to +make the post-office support itself, without a change of system. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Great Britain, the government, after full investigation, became +satisfied that it was impossible to suppress the private mails except by +under-bidding them, which they also ascertained that the government, +by its facilities, could afford to do. They also became satisfied that +no plan of partial reduction of postage could restore the energy of the +system, but the only hope of ultimate success was in the immediate +adoption of the lowest rate. And although the public debt presses so +heavily as to put every administration to its utmost resources for revenue, +they resolved to risk the whole net revenue then realized, equal +to above a million and a half sterling, as the best thing that could be +done. In the United States, the government, without extensive examination, +resolved to do what the British government dared not attempt, +that is, to put down the private mails by penal enactments. It also +resolved to adopt a partial reduction of the rates of postage; and +without regarding the mathematical demonstration of its futility, persevered +in regarding distance as the basis of the rates of charge. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A few extracts from the Debates in Parliament, will show several of +these points in a striking light: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Francis Baring, on first introducing the bill, +July 5, 1839, declared his conviction that the loss of revenue at the outset would be +</span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">very considerable indeed.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> He said the committee had considered that </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">two +pence postage could be introduced without any loss to the revenue,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> but he differed +from them, and found </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the whole of the authorities conclusively bearing in favor of +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page006">[pg 006]</span><a name="Pg006" id="Pg006" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +a penny postage.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> And he </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">conscientiously believed that the public ran less risk +of loss in adopting it.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> Referring to the petitions of the people, he said, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The +mass of them present the most extraordinary combination I ever saw, of representations +to one purpose, from all classes, unswayed by any political motive whatever, +from persons of all shades of opinion, political and religious, and from the commercial +and trading communities in all parts of the kingdom.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Goulburn</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, then one of the leaders of the opposition, +opposed so great a sacrifice of revenue, in the existing state of the country, but +admitted that it would </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">ultimately increase the wealth and prosperity of the +country.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> And if the experiment was to be tried at all, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">it would be best to make +it to the extent proposed,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> for </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the whole evidence went to show that a postage +of two pence would fail, but a penny might succeed.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Wallace</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> declared it </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">one of the greatest boons that +could be conferred on the human race,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> and he begged that, as </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">England had the +honor of the invention,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> they might not </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">lose the honor of being the first to +execute</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> a plan, which he pronounced </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">essentially necessary to the comforts of +the human race.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Sir </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Robert Peel</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, then at the head of the opposition, found +much fault with the financial plans of Mr. Baring, but he </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">would not say one word in +disparagement of the plans of Mr. Hill;</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> and if he wanted popularity, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">he would at +once give way to the public feeling in favor of the great moral and social advantages</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> +of the plan, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the great stimulus it would afford to industry and commercial +enterprise,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> and </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the boon it presented to the lower classes.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">O'Connell</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> thought it would be </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">one of the most valuable +legislative reliefs that had ever been given to the people.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> It was </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">impossible +to exaggerate its benefits.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> And even if it would not pay the expense of the +post-office, he held that </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">government ought to make a sacrifice for the purpose +of facilitating communication</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">July</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> 12, the debate was resumed. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Poulette Thompson</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> showed the impossibility of making a +correct estimate of the loss of revenue that would accrue. One witness before the +committee stated that there would be no deficiency; another said it would be small; while +Lord Ashburton declared that it would amount to a sacrifice of the whole revenue of the +post-office. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Warburton</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> denied that the post-office had ever been +regarded as a mere matter of revenue; the primary object of its institution was to +contribute to the convenience of the people; its advantages ought to be accessible to +the whole community, and not be made a matter of taxation at all. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Viscount Sandon</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, of the opposition, said he had long been of +the opinion that the post-office was not a proper source of revenue, but it </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">ought +to be employed in stimulating other sources of revenue.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">July</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> 22, another discussion came on. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Sir </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Robert Peel</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> admitted that </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">great social and commercial +advantages will arise from the change, independent of financial considerations.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">August</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> 5, the bill was taken up by the peers. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Viscount Melbourn</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, in opening the debate, dwelt upon the +extraordinary extent of the contraband conveyance of letters, as the effect of high +postage, and said this made it necessary to protect both the revenue and the morals of +the people by so great a reduction. The means of evasion were so organized, and resort +to them was so easy, and had even become a habit, that persons would, for a very small +profit, follow the contraband trade of conveying letters. It was therefore clearly +necessary to make the reduction to such an extent as would ensure the stopping of +the contraband trade. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Duke of Wellington</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> admitted </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the expediency, and indeed +the necessity</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> of the proposed change. He thought Mr. Hill's plan </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the one most +likely to succeed.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> He found fault with the financial plans of the administration, but +for the sake of the reform of the post-office, he said, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">I shall, although with great +reluctance, vote for the bill, and I earnestly recommend your lordships to do the +same.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> His customary mode of expressing his opinions. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Lord Ashburton</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> expected the cost of the department, under the +new system, would amount to a million sterling, which must be made up out of several +pence before you could touch one farthing of the present income of a million and six +hundred pounds. There could be no doubt that the country at large would derive an +immense benefit, the consumption of paper would be increased considerably, and it +was most probable the number of letters would be at least doubled. It appeared +to him a tax upon communication between distant parties was, </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">of all taxes, the +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page007">[pg 007]</span><a name="Pg007" id="Pg007" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic"> +most objectionable</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. At one time he had been of the opinion that the uniform charge +of postage should be two pence, but </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">he found the mass of evidence so strongly in +favor of one penny</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, that he concluded the ministers were right in coming down to +that rate. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">Earl of Lichfield</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, Postmaster-General, said the leading +idea of Mr. Rowland Hill's book seemed to be </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the fancy that he had hit upon a scheme +for recovering the two millions of revenue which he thought had been lost by the high +rates of postage.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> His own opinion was, that the recovery of the revenue was totally +impossible. He therefore supported the measure on entirely different grounds from +those on which Mr. Hill placed it. In neither house had it been brought forward +on the ground that the revenue would be the gainer. He assented to it on the simple +ground that </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">THE DEMAND FOR IT WAS UNIVERSAL</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. So obnoxious was +the tax upon letters, that he was entitled to say that </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the people had declared their +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">readiness to submit to any impost</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> that might be substituted in its +stead.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The proof is thus complete, that the British system was actually +adopted with sole reference to its general benefits, and the will of the +people, and not at all in the expectation of realizing, in any moderate +time, as much revenue as was derived from the old postage. The +revenue question was discarded, from a paramount regard to the public +good, which demanded the cheap postage, even if it should be +necessary to impose a new tax for its support. The extravagant +expectations of some of the over-sanguine friends of the new system, +were expressly disclaimed, and the government justified themselves on +these other considerations entirely—considerations which have been +most abundantly realized. It will be easy to show that the benefits +and blessings anticipated from the actual enjoyment of cheap postage, +have fully equalled the most sanguine expectations of the friends of the +measure, and have far exceeded in public utility, the pittance of income +to the treasury, which used to be wrung out by the tax upon letters. +The same examination will also show, that there is no substantial reason, +either in the system itself, or in any peculiarity of our circumstances, +why the same system is not equally practicable and equally +applicable here, nor why we should not realize at least as great benefits +as the people of Great Britain, from cheap postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Mr. Rowland Hill published his scheme in a pamphlet, in 1837. +In 1838, it had attracted so much notice, that between three and four +hundred petitions in its favor were presented to Parliament, and the +government consented to a select committee to collect and report information +on the subject. This committee sat sixty-three days, examined +the Postmaster-General and his secretaries and solicitors, elicited many +important tabular returns, and took the testimony of about ninety +other individuals, of a great variety of stations and occupations. +They also entered into many minute and elaborate calculations, which +give to their results the value of mathematical demonstration. Their +report, with the accompanying documents, fills three folio volumes of the +Parliamentary Papers for 1838. Its investigations were so thorough, +its deductions so cautious and candid, and its accumulations of evidence +so overwhelming that they left nothing to be done, but to adopt +the new system entire. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In this country, no such pains were taken to collect facts, no means +were used to spread before the people the facts and mathematical calculations +and irrefragable arguments of the parliamentary committee; +little study was bestowed on the subject even by our legislators but +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page008">[pg 008]</span><a name="Pg008" id="Pg008" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +with a prejudged conclusion that the reasonings and facts applicable to +Great Britain could not apply here, on account of the length of our +routes and the sparseness of our population, a partial reduction was +resolved upon, which retained the complication and the cumbersome +machinery of the old system, while affording only a small portion of the +benefits of the new. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The effect has been, that while the British system has gone on gathering +favor and strength, the American system, after less than three +years' trial, has already grown old, the private mails are reviving, the +ingenuity of men of business is taxed to evade postage, and a growing +conviction already shows itself, that the half-way reduction is a failure, +and it is time to make another change. That is to say, the partial +reduction has failed to meet the wishes of the people, or the wants of +the public interest, or the duty of the government in discharging the +trust imposed by the constitution. Indeed, there ought not to be a +great deal of labor required to prove that there is only one right way, +and that the right way is the best way, and that it is better to adopt a +scientifically constructed machine, which has been proved to be perfect +in all its parts, than a clumsy contrivance, the working principle +of which is contradicted by mathematical demonstration. I propose to +present several of the main principles involved in the reduction of +postage, illustrated by facts drawn from the parliamentary papers, and +from other authentic sources. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Reduction of Price tends to increase of Consumption.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Our own partial reform in postage proves this. In a report of the +committee on post-offices and post-roads, made to the House of Representatives, +May 15, 1844, it is said, +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“Events are in progress of fatal tendency to the Post-office Department, +and its decay has commenced. Unless arrested by vigorous +legislation, it must soon cease to be a self-sustaining institution, and +either be cast on the treasury for support, or suffered to decline from +year to year, till the system has become incompetent and useless. +The last annual report of the Postmaster-General shows that, notwithstanding +the heavy retrenchments he had made, the expenditures of +the department, for the year ending June 30th, 1843, exceeded its +income by the sum of $78,788. The decline of its revenue during +that year was $250,321; and the investigations made into the operations +of the current year, indicate a further and an increasing decline, +at the rate of about $300,000 a year. Why this loss of revenue, when +the general business and prosperity of the country is reviving, and its +correspondence is on the increase?”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of the Senate Committee at the same session, made Feb. +22, 1844, says that <span class="tei tei-q">“the cause of this great falling off, in a season of +reviving prosperity in the trade, business and general prosperity of the +country, cannot be regarded as transient, but, on the contrary, is +shown to be deep and corroding. The cause is the dissatisfaction felt +generally through the country, but most strongly in the densely peopled +regions to with the rates of postage now established by law, and the +frequent resort to various means of evading its payment.”</span> +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page009">[pg 009]</span><a name="Pg009" id="Pg009" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The result was the passage of the act, now in force, by which the +postage was reduced one half, to begin on the first day of July, 1845. +The last annual report of the Postmaster-General gives the result. +He says: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-q">“It is gratifying to find that, within so short a period after the great +reduction of the rates of postage, the revenues of the department have +increased much beyond the expectation of the friends of the cheap +postage system, while the expenditures, for the same time, have diminished +more than half a million of dollars annually, and that the department +is in a condition to support itself, without further aid from the +treasury.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The number of chargeable letters passed through the mails in +1843, was stated in the Report at 24,267,552, yielding the sum of +$3,525,268. The number for the year ending June 30, 1847, was +52,173,480, yielding $3,188,957. Thus the reduction of price one +half, has in two years more than doubled the consumption, and already +yields nearly an equal product. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The experiment in Great Britain shows that a still greater reduction +may be perfectly relied upon to give a rate of increase fully proportionable. +The <span class="tei tei-q">“Companion to the British Almanac,”</span> for 1842, says, +<span class="tei tei-q">“The rate of postage in the London district, (which includes the +limits of the old two penny post,) averaged 2-⅓<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> +per letter, before the late changes; at present it averages about +1-¼<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and the gross revenue +already equals that of 1835. The gross receipts in 1838, the last +complete year under the old system, were £118,000; the gross +revenue for 1840, the first complete year under the new system, was +$104,000.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The parliamentary committee, in their report in 1838, state, as the +result of all their inquiries, that the total number of chargeable letters +passing through the post-office annually, was about 77,500,000; +franks, 7,000,000; total of letters, 84,500,000. The average postage +per letter was 7<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> The gross receipts annually, for six years, +ending with 1820, were £2,190,597. For six years, ending with 1837, they +averaged £2,251,424. For the year 1847, the number of letters was +320,000,000, and the gross receipts nearly equal to the old system. +Here a reduction of the price three-fourths, has increased the consumption +fourfold. Some other cases of similar bearing, may be worth +stating, taken chiefly from the parliamentary documents. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Before the reduction of the duty on newspapers in England, the +price was 7<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and the number sold in a year was 35,576,056, +costing the public £1,037,634. On the reduction of the duty, the price was +reduced to 4-¾<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and the public immediately paid £1,058,779, for +53,496,207 papers. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Under the high duty on advertisements, when the price was 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> +each, the number was 1,010,000, costing £303,000. By the reduction +of the duty, the price fell to 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span>, and the number rose to +1,670,000, costing £334,000. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Formerly the fee of admission to the Armory of the Tower of London +was 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span>, at which rate there were in 1838, 9,508 visitors, who +paid £1,426. In 1839, the fee was reduced to 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span>, and there were +37,431 visitors, who paid £1,891. In 1840, the fee was reduced to +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page010">[pg 010]</span><a name="Pg010" id="Pg010" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and the number of visitors in nine months was 66,025, +who paid £1,650. During the entire year ending January 31, 1841, there +were 91,897 visitors, who paid £2,297. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The falling of the price of soap one-eighth, increased the consumption +one-third; the falling of tea one-sixth, increased consumption +one-half; the falling of silks one-fifth, doubled the consumption; of +coffee one-fourth, trebled it, and of cotton goods one-half quadrupled +it. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A multitude of similar facts could be collected in our own country, +showing the uniform and powerful tendency of diminished cost to +increased consumption. A gentleman who is interested in a certain +panorama said that, in a certain case, the exhibiter wrote to him that +the avails, at a quarter of a dollar per ticket, were not sufficient to +pay expenses. <span class="tei tei-q">“Put it down to twelve and a half cents,”</span> was the +reply. It was done, and immediately the receipts rose so as to give a +net profit of one hundred dollars a week. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These facts prove that there is a settled law in economics, that in +the case of any article of general use and necessity, a reduction in the +price may be expected to produce at least a corresponding increase of +consumption, and in many cases a very largely increased expenditure. +So that the amount expended by the people at low prices will be fully +equal to the amount expended for the same at high prices. The people +of England expend now as much money for postage, as they did +under the old system, but the advantage is, that they get a great deal +more service for their money, and it gives a spring to business, trade, +science, literature, philanthropy, social affection, and all plans of +public utility. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +II. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Nothing but Cheap Postage will suppress Private Mails.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is true that, in this country, private mails are not of so long +standing, nor so thoroughly systematized as they were in Great Britain +before the adoption of cheap postage. But on the other hand, the +state of things in this country affords much greater facilities for that +business, and renders their suppression by force of law much more +difficult and more odious than in Great Britain. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +On this head, the report of the Parliamentary Committee contains a +vast mass of information, which made a deep and conclusive impression, +upon the statesmen of that country. They found and declared that, +<span class="tei tei-q">“with regard to large classes of the community, those classes principally +to whom it is a matter of necessity to correspond on matters of +business, and to whom also it is a matter of importance to save, or +at least to reduce the expense of postage, the post-office, instead of +being viewed as it ought to be, and as it would be under a wise administration +of it, as an institution of ready and universal access, distributing +equally to all, and with an open hand, the blessings of commerce +upon civilization, is regarded by them as an establishment too expensive +not to be made use of, and as one with the employment of which +any endeavor to dispense by every means in their power.”</span> And +among <span class="tei tei-q">“the commercial and trading classes, by dint of the superior +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page011">[pg 011]</span><a name="Pg011" id="Pg011" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +activity, had in a considerable degree relieved themselves from the +pressure of this tax, without the interference of the legislature, by devising +other means for the cheap, safe and expeditious conveyance of +letters.”</span> Some specimens of these expedients, as developed by the +evidence before the Parliamentary Committee, will be at once curious +and instructive. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +M. B. Peacock, Esq., solicitor to the post-office, detailed the methods which the +department had used to suppress the illicit sending of letters. By law, one half of +the penalty, in cases of prosecution, went to the informer, but of late, informations +were given much less frequently, and he thought the diminution of informations was +owing to the fact that, about five years before, there had been a call in parliament +for a return of the names of informers. He said the post-office had done all in its +power to put a stop to the illegal sending, </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">but without success</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. And he was +decidedly of opinion, that the prevention is beyond the power of the post-office, and +could only be done by reducing the rates of postage. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. G. R. Huddlestone, superintendent of the ship-letter office, gave an account of +the illicit sending of letters from London to the outports to go by sea. He said they +were customarily sent in bags from the coffee houses, and by the owners of vessels, +in the same way as from the ship letter office, and no means had been devised which +could put a stop to it. Of 122,000 letters sent from the port of Liverpool in a year, +by the American packets, only 69,000 passed through the post-office. The number +of letters received inwards, from all parts of the world, by private ships, was +960,000 yearly; the number sent outwards through the post-office, was but 265,000. +In the year ending October 5, 1837, there were forty-nine arrivals of these packets, +bringing 282,000 letters. The number of letters forwarded from London by post to +Liverpool for these lines, was 11,000; the number received in London from these +lines, was 51,000 a year. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. Banning, postmaster at Liverpool, stated that, in return for 370,000 ship letters +received at his office in a year, addressed to persons elsewhere than at Liverpool, +only 78,000 letters passed through that office to be sent outwards. And yet +the masters of vessels assured him that the number of letters they conveyed outwards +was quite equal to the number brought inwards. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. Maury, of Liverpool, said that on the first voyage of the Sirius steamship to +America, only five letters were received at the post-office to go by her, while at least +10,000 were sent in a bag from the consignee of the ship. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. Bates stated that the house of Baring & Co. commonly sent two hundred +letters a week, in boxes, from London to Liverpool, to go to America—equal to +10,000 a year. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These things were done under the very eye of the authorities, and +yet no means had been found to prevent it. What police can our +government establish, strict enough to do what the British government +publicly declared itself unable to do? +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The correspondence, of the manufacturing towns, it appeared, was +carried on almost entirely in private and illicit channels. In Walsall, +it was testified that, of the letters to the neighboring towns, not one-fiftieth +were sent by mail. Mr. Cobden said that not one-sixth of +the letters between Manchester and London went through the post-office. +Mr. Thomas Davidson, of Glasgow, stated the case of five +commercial houses in that city, whose correspondence sent illegally +was to that sent by post in the ratio of more than twenty to one; one +house said sixty-seven to one. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Birmingham, a system of illicit distribution of letters had been +established through the common-carriers to all the neighboring towns, +in a circuit of fifteen miles, and embracing a population of half a +million. The price of delivering a letter in any of these places was +1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and for this the letters were both collected and delivered. +Women +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page012">[pg 012]</span><a name="Pg012" id="Pg012" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +were employed to go round at certain hours and collect letters. They +would collect them for 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. per hundred, and make a living by it. +The regular postage to those towns was 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., besides the trouble +of taking letters to the post-office. Hence there was both economy and convenience +in the illicit arrangement. The practice had existed for +thirty years, and when it was brought in all its details to the notice of +parliament, no man seems to have dreamed that it was in the power of +the government to suppress it by penal enactments. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +An individual, whose name and residence are, for obvious reasons, suppressed, +gave the committee a full description of these private posts. He said that, in the +year 1836, he kept an account of his letters; that the number sent by the post-office +was 2068, and those sent by other means were 5861. Of these, about 5000 were to +places within twenty miles, all of which were sent for 1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. each. +Some carriers made it their sole business to carry letters. Some of them travelled on +foot; others went by the stage coach to the place, and then distributed their letters. +He found the practice prevailing when he began his apprenticeship in 1807. The population +of the district thus accommodated was from 300,000 to 500,000. The practice was +notorious, and used by all persons engaged in business. The object of a great deal +of the correspondence was to convey orders, notes of inquiry, and other information +to and from the small manufacturers, to whom it would be a tax of twenty-five per +cent. on their earnings, if the letters were sent through the post-office at +4</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. The letters were commonly wrapped up in brown paper, or tied +with a string, some directed and some not. Very few persons thought about the practice +being illegal. He had never heard of an attempt by the post-office to institute legal +proceedings. It would absorb the whole revenue of the post-office to carry on the +prosecutions that would be required to stop it, and without any effect, as most of the +carriers were worth nothing. To suppress it by law, would be very injurious to the trade +of the place. The only way to supersede it is to reduce the postage to +1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. Were this done, the post-office would be preferred, for its +greater certainty, even though the carriers would go for a halfpenny. The post-office +would unquestionably receive more money by the change. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">E. F.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">, a manufacturer, described what he called the +</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">free-packet</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> system. Those manufacturers who did much business +with London, in forwarding parcels through the stage coaches, were allowed by the coach +proprietors to send a </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">free-packet,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> without any charge, except +4</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. for booking; and this package contained +not only the letters and patterns of the house itself, but of others, who thus evade +the postage. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">G. H.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> had been a carrier, from a town in Scotland to other towns. There +were six carriers, and they all carried letters, generally averaging fifty a day, and +realizing from 6</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">s</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. to 7</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">s</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. per day, although +there were four mails a-day running from the town. The business was kept in a manner +secret. Reducing the postage to 2</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. would not stop the practice, +because the carriers would still take the letters for 1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">.; but a +penny postage would bring all the letters into the post-office, and then +the post-office would beat the smuggler. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. John Reid, of London, formerly an extensive bookseller in Glasgow said his +house used to send out twenty to twenty-five letters a day, and scarcely ever through +the post. Of 20,000 times of infringing the post-office laws, he was never caught +but once, and then the government failed in proof, and he had the matter exposed as +a grievance in the house of commons. He had seen a carrier in Glasgow have more +than 300 letters at a time, which he delivered for 1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. Nearly all +the correspondence between Glasgow and Paisley, was by carriers. There were 200 carriers +came to Glasgow daily. There was as regular a system of exchanging bags, as in the +post-office. There was not much attempt at concealment; sometimes we got frightened, +and sometimes we laughed at the postmasters. Of his own letters, about one in +twenty of those sent, and one in twelve of those received, passed through the +post-office. The only way to put an end to the smuggling of letters was to remove the +inducement. He said he could send letters to every town in Scotland. He could +do it in more ways than one. He declined to state in what ways he would +do it, because the disclosure would knock up some convenient modes he had +of ending his own letters, and those of others. He said he would never use +the post-office in an illegal manner, as by writing on newspapers and the like, +because that would be dishonestly availing himself of the post-office, without +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page013">[pg 013]</span><a name="Pg013" id="Pg013" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +paying for it. But he considered </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">he had a right to send his letters as he +pleased</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. +He did not feel it his duty to acquiesce in a bad law, but thought every good man +should set himself against a bad law, in order to get it repealed. Some of the +methods of evading postage, practised in Scotland, are amusing. One was through +what he called </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">family boxes.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> When a student from the country comes to Glasgow +to attend the college, he usually receives a box, once or twice a week, from his +family, who send him cheese, meal, butter, cakes, &c., which come cheaper from +the farm-house than he can purchase them in town. Probably, also, his clean linen +comes in this way. The moment it was known that any family had a son at the +university, the neighbors made a post-office of that farm-house. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The committee, in their report, concur in the opinion expressed by +almost all the officers of the department, that it was not by stronger +powers to be conferred by the legislature, nor by rigor in the exercise +of those powers, that illicit conveyance could be suppressed. The +post-office must be enabled <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">to recommend itself to the public mind</span></em>. +It must secure to itself a virtual monopoly, by the greater security, +expedition, punctuality, <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">and cheapness</span></em>, with which it does its work, +than can be reached by any private enterprise. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +With this nearly all the witnesses also agree, although some of +them thought it possible that a less extreme reduction of the rate +of postage might have kept out the private mails, if it had taken +place earlier, before these illicit enterprises had obtained so firm a +footing. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Lord Ashburton, who was examined before the committee, said that had a uniform +rate of 2</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">., or even 3</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. been adopted +heretofore, most persons would sooner pay it than look out for the means of evading it. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. Cobden, of Manchester, said a 6</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. rate between Manchester and +London would increase but slightly the number of letters, since the sending of letters +clandestinely has become a trade, which would not be easily broken down. The railroads +which are now opening to all parts of the country will so increase the facilities +for smuggling, as </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">to counteract any reduction</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> of from twenty to fifty per +cent. on the postage. No small reduction will induce the people to write more. A +reduction to one half of the present rates would certainly be a relief to his trade, as +far as it went, that is, to all such as now pay the full rate; but he thinks it would not +induce the poorer classes to use the post-office. It would occasion a loss to the revenue +of fifty per cent. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Mr. W. Brown, merchant of Liverpool, was sure a reduction to half the present +rates would give satisfaction to the public, but would not meet the question, and +would not prevent smuggling. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +I. J. Brewin, of Cirencester, one of the Society of Friends, considered the effect of +a two penny rate would be, that the post-office would get the long jobs, but not the +short ones. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Lieutenant F. W. Ellis, auditor of district unions in Suffolk, under the poor law +commissioners, said that 2</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. would not have the effect of +1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. in bringing correspondence +to the post-office, because by carriers, and in other ways, letters are now conveyed +for 1</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The evidence seems to have produced a universal and settled conviction, +that as far as the contraband conveyance of letters was an +evil, either financial or social, there was no remedy for it but an absolute +reduction of the postage to 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. There were large portions of the +country in which the government could control the postage at a higher +rate, 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. or even 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.; but in the densely +populated districts, where the greatest amount of correspondence arises, and where are +also the greatest facilities for evading postage, no rate higher than +1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. would secure the whole correspondence to the mails. They +therefore +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page014">[pg 014]</span><a name="Pg014" id="Pg014" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +left the penal enactments just as they were, because they might be of +some convenience in some cases. Mr. Hill declared his opinion that it +would be perfectly safe to throw the business open to competition, for +that the command of capital, and other advantages enjoyed by the +post-office, would enable it to carry letters more cheaply and punctually +<em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">than can be done</span></em> by private individuals. And the result shows +that he was right; for the contraband carriage of letters is put down. +The Companion to the British Almanac, for 1842, says, <span class="tei tei-q">“The illicit +transmission of letters, and the evasions practised under the old system +to avoid postage, <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">have entirely ceased</span></em>.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +All this experience, and all these sound conclusions, are doubtless +applicable in the United States, with the additional considerations, of +the great extent of country, the limited powers of the government, the +entire absence of an organized police, and the fact that the federal +government is to so great a degree regarded as a stranger in the States. +Shall a surveillance, which the British government has abandoned as +impracticable, be seriously undertaken at this day by the congress of +the United States? +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +III. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">The Postage Law of 1845.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Postage Act, passed March 3, 1845, which went into operation +on the 1st of July of that year, was called forth by a determination to +destroy the private mails; and this object gave character to the act as +a whole. The reports of the postmaster-general, and of the post-office +committees in both houses of congress, show that the end which +was specially aimed at was to overthrow these mails. The Report of +the House Committee, presented May 15, 1844, says: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Events are in progress of fatal tendency to the post-office department, and its +decay has commenced. Unless arrested by vigorous legislation, it must soon +cease to exist as a self-sustaining institution, and either be cast on the treasury for +support, or suffered to decline from year to year, till the system has become impotent +and useless. The last annual report of the postmaster-general shows that, notwithstanding +the heavy retrenchments he had made, the expenditures of the department +for the year ending June 30, 1843, exceeded its income by the sum of $78,788. +The decline of its revenue during that year was $250,321; and the investigations +made into the operations of the current year, indicate a further and an increasing +decline, at the rate of about $300,000 a year.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">This illicit business has been some time struggling through its incipient stages; +for it was not until the year commencing the 1st July, 1840, that it appears to have +made a serious impression upon the revenues of the department. It has now assumed +a bold and determined front, and dropped its disguises; opened offices for the reception +of letters, and advertised the terms on which they will be despatched out of +the mail.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The revenue for the year ending June 30, 1840, was $4,539,265; for the last +year it was $4,295,925; and indications show that for the present year it will not +be more than $3,995,925.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The number of chargeable letters in circulation, exclusive of dead letters, during +the year ending June 30, 1840, may be assumed at 27,535,554. The annual number +now reported to be in circulation, is 24,267,552. Thus, 3,268,000 letters a +year and $543,340 of annual revenue, are the spoils taken from the mails by +cupidity.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page015">[pg 015]</span><a name="Pg015" id="Pg015" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Report of the Senate Committee has this remark: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">We have seen in the outset that something </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">must</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> be done; that the revenues +of the department are rapidly falling off, and a remedy must in some way be found for +this alarming evil, or the very consequences so much dreaded by some from the +reduction proposed, will inevitably ensue; namely, a great curtailment of the service, +or a heavy charge upon the national treasury for its necessary expenses. It is +believed that in consequence of the disfavor with which the present rates and other +regulations of this department are viewed, and the open violations of the laws before +adverted to, that not more than, if as much as one half the correspondence of the +country passes through the mails; the greater part being carried by private hands, +or forwarded by means of the recently established private expresses, who perform +the same service, at much less cost to the writers and recipients of letters than the +national post-office. It seems to the committee to be impossible to believe that there +are but twenty-four or twenty-seven millions of letters per year, forwarded to distant +friends and correspondents in the United States, by a population of twenty millions of +souls; whilst, at the same time, there are </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">two hundred and four millions</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> and +upwards of letters passing annually through the mails of Great Britain and Ireland, +with a population of only about twenty-seven millions.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Senate Report recommended the reduction of the rates of postage +to five and ten cents, an average of seven and a half cents, +with a very great restriction of the franking privilege, on which it was +confidently estimated that the revenues of the department, for the first +year of the new system, would be $4,890,500; and that the number +of chargeable letters would be sixty millions. The House Report +recommended stringent measures to suppress the private mails, with +the abolition of franking, without any reduction of postage, except to +substitute federal coin for Spanish. It estimated the increase of letters to +be produced by reducing the rates to five and ten cents, at only thirty +per cent. in number, thus reducing the postage receipts at once to +two and a half millions of dollars. It will be seen that each of these +calculations has been proved to be erroneous. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The great postage meeting in New York, held in December, 1843, +had asked for a uniform rate of five cents. After stating the advantages +of the English system, their committee still hung upon the length +of the routes in this country as a reason against the adoption of the +low rate of postage. They said, +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">It is plain that a similar system may be introduced with equally +satisfactory results in the United States. On account, however, of the vast distances to +be traversed by the mail-carriers, and the great difficulties of travel in the unsettled +portions of our country, our petition asks that the rate be reduced to five cents for +each letter not more than half an ounce in weight—which is more than double the +uniform postage in Great Britain. It is a rate which would not only secure to the +post-office the transport of nearly all the letters which are now forwarded through +private channels, but it would largely increase correspondence, both of business and +affection.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Above all, the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">franking privilege</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> should be abolished. Unless this is +done, nothing can be done. It will be impossible, without drawing largely upon the +legitimate sources of the national revenue, to sustain the post-office by any rates +whatsoever, if this franking privilege shall continue to load the mails with private +letters which everybody writes, and public documents which nobody reads.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The bill was passed, but the franking privilege was continued, and +yet the Postmaster-General has told us that the current income of the +department is equal to its expenses. The predictions to the contrary +were very confident. Some of the gloomy forebodings then uttered, +are worthy of being recalled at this time. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page016">[pg 016]</span><a name="Pg016" id="Pg016" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The post-office department estimates that the deficiency in the revenue of the +department, under the new law, will be about $1,500,000, this +year.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Boston Post.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">An additional tax of $1,500,000, to be raised to meet the deficiencies of the +department, in a single year, must principally come from the pockets of farmers, +(who write few letters, and are consequently less benefited by the reduction of postage,) +in the shape of additional tariff duties upon articles which they +consume.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">New Hampshire Patriot.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">A Caution.</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—Some people may be deceived on the subject +of cheap postage, unless they take a </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">sober second thought.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> A part of those who are +so strenuous for cheap postage are not quite so disinterested as would at first appear. +They are seeking to pay their postage bills out of other people's pockets. Look at this +matter. I am an industrious mechanic, for example, and I have little time to write +letters. My neighbor publishes school-books, and he wishes to be sending off letters, +recommendations, puffs, &c., by the hundred and by the thousand. This is his way of +making money. Now, he wishes the expenses of the post-office department to be +paid out of the treasury, and then I shall have to help him pay his postage, while he +will only pay his national tax, according to his means, as I do mine. If he is +making his money by sending letters, he should pay the whole cost of carrying those +letters. I ought not to pay any part of it, in the way of duties on sugar, &c. Let +every man pay his own postage. Is not this fair? But this will not be the case if +the post-office department does not support itself. The cheap postage system may +injure the poor man, instead of helping him.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Philad. North +American.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">As for the matter of post-office reform, and reduction of the rates of +postage, there are not </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">one thousand</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> considerate and reflecting people, in +the Union, who desire or demand anything of the kind.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The commercial and mercantile classes have not desired </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">reform;</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> and the rural +and agricultural classes, the planters of the South, and the corn and wheat growers +of the West, the mechanics and laboring classes, are not disposed to be +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">taxed</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> enormously to support a post-office department to gratify the avarice +and cupidity of a body of sharpers and +speculators.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Madisonian.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">The New Postage Law.</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—The following +statement has been furnished us of the amount of postage chargeable on letters forwarded +by the New York and Albany steamboats:</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The last thirteen days of June, $99.66</span><br /><span style="font-size: 90%"> +First thirteen days of July, (same route,) 53.90</span><br /><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Decrease, $45.76. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Albany Argus.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">I inquired at the post-office to-day for information. One of the gentlemanly +clerks of that establishment said to me, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Well, Mr. Smith, I can't give you all the +information you desire, but I can say thus much. I this morning made up a mail for +Hudson; it amounted to </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">seventy cents</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">; the same letters under the old law, +and in the same mail, would have paid </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">seven dollars</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. Now you can make your +own deductions.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> I then inquired of the same gentleman, if the increase of letters +had been kept up since the 1st of July. He replied </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">no</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> but added, +</span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">the increase of numbers is somewhat encouraging, but not sufficiently so to justify +the belief that the new law will realize the hopes of its +advocates.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> ”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">N. Y. Correspondent of Boston Post.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">From the city post-office we learn that the number of letters, papers, and packages, +passing through their hands, unconnected with the business of the government, +has increased about 33 per cent., when compared with the business of the month of +June. The gross amount of proceeds from postage on these has fallen off nearly 66 +per cent., while the postage charged to the government for its letters, &c., received +and sent, is enormous. For the post-office department alone, it is said to reach near +$40,000 for the month just past.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Washington Union, Aug. +2.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">We observe in the Eastern papers some paragraphs about the working of the +new law, in which they suppose it will work well. Unquestionably it will work +well for those who have to pay the postage; but as to the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">revenue</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, it will +not yield even as much as the opponents of the system supposed. We do not believe the +receipts will equal one half received under the old system. We are told that the +experience of the first week in Cincinnati does not show more than </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">one +quarter</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> the receipts.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Private correspondence is increased a little; but the falling off in the +mercantile increase is immense. It cannot be otherwise; for many letters now pay 10 cents +which formerly paid a dollar. Double and treble letters pay no more than single +letters. In large cities three-fourths of the postage is paid by </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">business +letters</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. These +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page017">[pg 017]</span><a name="Pg017" id="Pg017" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +letters are nearly all double and treble. A double letter from Cincinnati to New +York, Philadelphia, Boston, Baltimore, or New Orleans, before, paid 50 cents; +now it pays 10 cents. The largest portion of postage is reduced to </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">one-fifth</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> +part of the former postage.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">We are well pleased, however, that it will turn out as it will. The law +will be too popular with the people to be repealed; and it will oblige Mr. James K. +Polk's administration to provide ways and means out of the tariff to meet a deficiency of +two millions in the postage. This will work favorably to the tariff.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">All things will come right in the end. The lower the postage the more economical +the post-office department must be, and the more money the government must +raise from the tariff.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Cleveland Herald.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Mr. McDuffie is reported to have made the following correct and just remarks, +showing he understands well the operations of that Department. If the bill shall +become a law, our word for it, that in less than six months one-fourth the offices in +the Union will be discontinued, because nobody will be found who will keep them. +But let the bill go into operation, and in less than twelve months the very clamorers +for low rates of postage will become so sick of it, that they will be the first to unite +in demanding its repeal. If we supposed our advice would have any influence, we +would recommend to the Department and all Postmasters to hold on to the old books, +arrangements and fixtures, even if the bill does pass, because in two weeks after +Congress shall meet next year, it will be repealed and the old order +restored.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Kentucky Yeoman.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“ </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Mr. McDuffie rose, evidently much excited, and after +expressing his regret that bodily infirmity disabled him to give the strength of his +convictions in regard to the evils which would flow from the bill, he protested against +its passage, as a measure more radical and revolutionary than anything that had ever been +done by Congress. He denounced it as most unjust. It removes the burden from those who +ought to have it, the manufacturers and merchants of the North, and throws it upon the +farmers of the South and West, who are already oppressed by the tariff, and who will +have to pay the expense by a tax on their necessaries.</span></span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“ </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">You will sacrifice the intelligence of the people to the rapacity of the +manufacturers. He could not imagine that the agriculturist anywhere could feel postage as +a burden; it is but a moderate compensation for services rendered by the government. +A poor man pays $10 duty on his sugar, salt and iron, and now you make +him pay the postage. You will break up one half of the smaller offices, you will in +ten years make the post-office the greatest organ of corruption the country has ever +seen, and the man who wields its patronage can command the sceptre. By throwing +it on the treasury, you destroy the responsibility of the head of the department, and +in ten years you will have it cost you ten millions of dollars.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> ”</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Instead of a revenue of nearly four millions, it is therefore probable that the revenue +of the first year of the experiment will not much exceed a million and a half. +It will be remembered that Congress appropriated $750,000 to make up the +expected deficiency; but this will fall far below the necessities of the service; and +it is very probable that this sum will be consumed in the payments of the contracts +for the two first quarters. They are very busy at the Department sending off letter +balances, the postage of which will of course constitute a charge on the Treasury; +and as the postage on each of these packets will amount to about three times as +much as the first cost of the balances, the Department will make money out of this +transaction.—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Charleston Mercury.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">I voted against this act. It is probable that a reduction might have been made in +the rates of postage which would not have diminished the amount of revenue; but the +reduction made by this act is too great, and will have the effect of throwing the +Post-Office Department as a heavy charge on the general treasury, which has not been +the case heretofore. The post-office tax was the only one in which the North and +the East bore their share equally with the South and the West. We would all +like to have cheap postage; and if that were the only consideration involved, I +would have voted for the act; but there were others which influenced me to oppose +it. The reduction of postage will cause a diminution in the post-office revenue, +which must be supplied by the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">general treasury</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. The treasury collects the +revenue which must supply this deficiency, by a duty levied on imports; so that the tax +taken off of the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">mail correspondence</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> will have to be collected on +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">salt</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">iron</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">sugar</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">blankets</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, and other articles which we buy from the stores. The manufacturing +States profit by this, because it aids the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">protective</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> policy. I might add +other objections, but deem it unnecessary at present.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">—</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Letter +of Hon. D. S. Reid, of ——, to his constituents.</span></span> +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page018">[pg 018]</span><a name="Pg018" id="Pg018" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Postmaster-General, in his report made Dec. 1, 1845, says: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">So far as calculations can be relied on, from the returns to the department, of the +operation of the new postage law, for the quarter ending 30th September last, the +deficiency for the current year will exceed a million and a quarter of dollars; and +there is no reasonable ground to believe that, without some amendment of that law, +it will fall short of a million of dollars for the next year.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The actual deficiency for the year ending June 30, 1846, was only +$589,837; and for the second year above alluded to, ending June 30, +1847, it was but $33,677. And the Postmaster-General's report for +December, 1847, estimates the resources of the department for the +year ending June 30, 1848, at $4,313,157, and the expenditures at +$4,099,206, giving an actual surplus of $213,951. If this expectation +should be realized, (and there is hardly a possibility but that it should +be exceeded), the income will exceed the annual average receipts for +the nine years before the reduction of postage, $51,467. The Postmaster-General +ascribes the increase solely to <span class="tei tei-q">“the reduction in the +rates of postage,”</span> while nearly a million of dollars are saved in the +expenditures by the provision of the law of 1845, directing the contracts +to be let to the lowest bidder, without reference to the transportation +in coaches. So far, therefore, the triumph of the law of +1845 has been complete. It has proved that the same economic law +exists here as in England, by which reduction of price leads to increase +of consumption. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +On the other point, however, of meeting the wants of the people, so +as to bring all the correspondence of the country into the mails, its +success is very far from being equally satisfactory. The five and ten +cents' postage does not have the effect of suppressing the private mails +and illicit transportation of letters. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of the House Committee in 1844, showed beforehand +that such a reduction could not have the effect here, just as the parliamentary +report had shown in 1838, that nothing but an absolute +reduction to 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> could suppress the private mails in England. +<span class="tei tei-q">“Individuals can prosecute on all the large railroad and steamboat routes +between the great towns, as now, a profitable business in conveying +letters at three and five cents, where the government would ask the five +and ten cents postages.”</span> Hill's New Hampshire Patriot said, shortly +after the act went into operation: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Private expresses </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">have not</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> been discontinued in this quarter. Far from +it. They are now doing as large a business as ever, carrying letters at half the +government rates. And, strange as it may appear, they appear to be sustained by public +opinion. The new postage act did not abate what is called </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">private enterprise,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> +and the act itself, it is thought, will soon be found to be insufficient.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of the Postmaster-General in 1845, speaks of a practice +of enveloping many letters, written on very thin paper, in one enclosure, +paying postage by the half-ounce, and thus reducing the postage +on each to a trifle. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">An incident recently occurred which will forcibly illustrate the injurious effects +of such a practice upon the revenues of the department. A large bundle of letters +was enveloped and sealed, marked </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">postage paid, $1.60.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> By some accident in the +transportation, the envelope was so much injured as to enable the postmaster to see +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page019">[pg 019]</span><a name="Pg019" id="Pg019" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +that it contained one hundred letters to different individuals, evidently designed for +distribution by the person to whom directed, and should have been charged ten dollars. +The continuance of this practice would, in a short time, deprive the department +of a large proportion of its legitimate income. The department has no power +to suppress it, further than to direct the postages to be properly charged, whenever +such practices are detected. This has also introduced a species of thin, light paper, +by which five or six letters may be placed under one cover, and still be under the +half-ounce.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +He adds: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The practice of sending packages of letters through the mails to agents, for +distribution, has not entirely superseded the transmission of letters, over post roads, +out of the mails, by the expresses. The character of this offence is such as to render +detection very uncertain, full proof almost impossible, conviction rare. The penalties +are seldom recovered after conviction, and the department rarely secures enough to +meet the expenses of prosecution. If the officers of the department were authorized +in proper cases to have the persons engaged in these violations of the law arrested, +their packages, trunks, or boxes, seized and examined before a proper judicial officer, +and, when detected in violating the law, retained for the examination of the +court and jury, it is believed that the practice could be at once suppressed.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In his last report, December, 1847, he also says that, <span class="tei tei-q">“Private +expresses still continue to be run between the principal cities, and +seriously affect the revenues of the department, from the want of adequate +powers for their suppression.”</span> The complaint is continually, of +a want of adequate powers to suppress the practice. The law of 1845 +has gone as far as could be desired in the severity of penalties and the +extent of their application, involving in heavy fines every person who +shall send or receive letters; and every stage-coach, railroad car, +steamboat, or other vehicle or vessel—its owners, conductors and +agents, which may knowingly be employed in the conveyance of letters, +or in the conveyance of any person employed in such conveyance, +under penalty of $50 for each letter transported. What the post-office +department would deem <span class="tei tei-q">“adequate powers”</span> for the suppression +of illicit letter-carrying, may be seen in the following extract of a bill, +which was actually reported by the post-office committee of the House +of Representatives, and <span class="tei tei-q">“printed by order of the House:”</span> +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">And it shall be lawful for the agents of the post-office, or other officers of the +United States government, upon reasonable cause shown, to arrest such person or +persons, and seize his or their boxes, bags, or trunks, supposed to contain such +mailable matter, and cause the same to be opened and examined before any officer of +the United States; and if found to contain such mailable matter, transported in violation +of the laws of the United States, shall be held to bail in the sum of five thousand +dollars, to appear and answer said charge before the next United States Court +to be held in said State, or district of said State; and upon conviction thereof, shall +be fined as aforesaid, one hundred dollars for each letter, newspaper, or printed sheet +so transported as aforesaid, and shall be held in the custody of the marshal until the +fine and costs are paid, or until otherwise discharged by due course of law.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of 1845 thinks there is <span class="tei tei-q">“no just reason why individuals +engaged in smuggling letters and robbing the department of its legitimate +revenues should not be punished, in the same way and to the +same extent, as persons guilty of smuggling goods; nor why the same +means of detection should not be given to the Post-office Department +which are now given to the Treasury.”</span> That is, the power of detention +and search in all cases of suspicion by the agent, that a person is +carrying letters. What would be the effect of carrying out this system, +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page020">[pg 020]</span><a name="Pg020" id="Pg020" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +in breaking up the practice complained of, or what would be the +amount of inconvenience to travellers and to business, of a thorough +determination in the department to execute such a law in the spirit of +it, all can judge for themselves. The British government, as we have +seen, dared not entertain such a proposition. I have no hesitation in +saying, that such a system of coercion can never be successfully executed +here. It is better to meet the difficulty, as the British government +did, in a way to make the post-office at once the most popular +vehicle of transmission, and the greatest blessing which the government +can bestow upon the people. The New York Evening Post said, +years ago: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Congress yields, and passes such a law. What then? Is Hydra dead? By no +means, its ninety-nine other heads still rear their crests, and bid defiance to the +secretary and his law. In Pearl street, there will yet hang a bag for the deposit of +the whole neighborhood's letters,—at Astor House, and at Howard's, at the American, +and at the City Hotels, still every day will see the usual accumulation of +letters,—all to be taken by some </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">private,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> trustworthy, obliging wayfarer, +and by him be deposited in some office at Boston, Philadelphia, Albany, Baltimore.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I have no doubt that the cheap transmission of letters, out of the +mails, is now becoming systematized and extended between our large +cities, and an immense amount of correspondence is also carried on +between the large cities and the towns around. The Boston Path-Finder +contains a list of 240 <span class="tei tei-q">“Expresses,”</span> as they are called, that is, +of common carriers, who go regularly from Boston to other towns, +distant from three miles to three hundred. Most of these men carry +<span class="tei tei-q">“mailable matter”</span> to a great extent, in their pockets or hats, in the +shape of orders, memorandums, receipts, or notes, sometimes on slips +of paper, sometimes in letters folded in brown paper and tied with a +string, and not unfrequently in the form of regularly sealed letters. If +we suppose each one to carry, on an average, ten in a day, a very low +estimate, there are 750,000 letters brought to Boston in a year by this +channel alone. Everything which calls public attention to the subject +of postage, every increase of business causing an increase of correspondence +between any two places, every newspaper paragraph +describing the wonderful increase of letters in England, will awaken +new desires for cheap postage; and these desires will gratify themselves +irregularly, unless the only sure remedy is seasonably applied. +In the division of labor and the multiplication of competitions, there +are many lines of business of which the whole profits are made up of +extremely minute savings. In these the cost of postage becomes material; +and such concerns will not pay five cents on their letters, when +they can get them taken, carried and delivered for two cents. The +causes which created illicit penny posts in England are largely at work +here, with the growth and systematization of manufactures and trade; +and they are producing, and will produce the same results, until, on +the best routes, not one-sixth of the letters will be carried in the mail, +unless the true system shall be seasonably established. The evils of +such a state of things need not be here set forth. One of the greatest, +which would not strike every mind, is the demoralization of the +public mind, in abating the reverence for law, and the sense of gratitude +and honor to the government. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page021">[pg 021]</span><a name="Pg021" id="Pg021" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In this respect, of bringing all the correspondence into the mails, in +furnishing all the facilities and encouragements to correspondence which +the duty of the government requires, in superseding the use of unlawful +conveyances, and in winning the patriotic regards of the people to +the post-office, as to every man's friend, the act of 1845 has entirely +failed. It has not only falsified the predictions of us all in regard to +its productiveness, on the one hand, but it has even convinced the +highest official authority that it has failed to prove itself to be <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">the</span></em> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">CHEAP POSTAGE</span></span>, which the country needs and will support. In his +last annual report, the Postmaster-General says: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The favorable operation of the act of 1845, upon the finances of this +department, leads to the conclusion that, by the adoption of such modifications as have +been suggested by this department for the improvement of its revenues, and the +suppression of abuses practised under it, the present low rates of postage will not only +produce revenue enough to meet the expenditures, but will leave a considerable surplus +annually to be applied to the extension of the mail service to the new and rapidly +increasing sections of our country, or would justify a still further reduction of the +rates of postage. In the opinion of the undersigned, with such modifications of the act +of 1845 as have been suggested, an uniform less rate might, in a few years, be made to +cover the expenses of the department; but by its adoption the department would be +compelled to rely upon the treasury for a few years. At this time, during the existence +of a foreign war, imposing such heavy burdens upon the treasury, it might not +be wise or prudent to increase them, or to do anything which would tend to impair +the public credit; and, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">ON THIS ACCOUNT</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> alone, recommendation +for such a reduction is not made.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Postage is a tax, not only on the business of the country, but upon the +intelligence, knowledge, and the exercise of the friendly and social feelings; and in the +opinion of the undersigned, should be reduced to the lowest point which would +enable the department to sustain itself. That principle has been uniformly acted on +in the United States, as the true standard for the regulation of postage, and the +cheaper it can be made, consistently with that rule, the better.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">As our country expands, and its circle of business and correspondence enlarges, +as civilization progresses, it becomes more important to maintain between the different +sections of our country a speedy, safe, and cheap intercourse. By so doing, +energy is infused into the trade of the country, the business of the people enlarged, +and made more active, and an irresistible impulse given to industry of every kind; +by it wealth is created and diffused in numberless ways throughout the community, +and the most noble and generous feelings of our nature between distant friends are +cherished and preserved, and the Union itself more closely bound together.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Nothing can be more true than the position, that <span class="tei tei-q">“postage is a +tax,”</span> and that it is the duty of the government to make this <span class="tei tei-q">“tax”</span> as +light as possible, consistent with its other and equally binding duties. +Nothing more sound than the doctrine that it is utterly wrong to charge +postage with <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">anything more</span></em> than its own proper expenses. Nothing +more just than the estimate here given of the benefits of cheap postage. +The blessings he describes are so great, so real, so accordant +with the tone and beneficent design of civil government itself, and +especially to the functions and duties of a republican government, that +I do not think even the existence and embarrassments of a state of war, +such as now exists, are any reason at all for postponing the commencement +of so glorious a measure. If it could be brought about under +the administration of an officer who has expressed himself so cordially +and intelligently in favor of cheap postage, and whose ability and +fidelity in the economical administration of affairs are so well known, +it would be but a fitting response to the statesmanlike sentiments +quoted above. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page022">[pg 022]</span><a name="Pg022" id="Pg022" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I am now to show that, on the strictest principles of justice, on the +closest mathematical calculation, on the most enlarged and yet rigid +construction of the duty imposed on the federal government by our +constitution, two cents per half ounce is the most just and equal rate +of postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +IV. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">What is the just Rule to be observed in settling the Rates of +Postage?</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The posting of letters may be looked at, either as a contract between +the government and the individuals who send and receive letters, or as +a simple exercise of governmental functions in discharging a governmental +duty. The proper measure of the charge to be imposed should +be considered in each of these aspects, for the government is bound to +do that which is right in both these relations. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Viewed simply as a contract, or a service rendered for an equivalent, +what would be the rate to be charged? Not, surely, the amount it +would cost the individual to send his own particular letter. The saving +effected by the division and combination of labor is a public benefit, +and not to be appropriated as an exclusive right by one. In this view, +the government stands only in the relation of a party to the contract, +just as a state or a town would do, or an individual. No right or +power of monopoly can enter into the calculation. We can illustrate +the question by supposing a case, of a town some thirty miles from +Boston, to which there has hitherto been no common-carrier. The +inhabitants resolve to establish an express, and for this purpose enter +into negotiations with one of their neighbors, in which they agree to +give him their business on his agreeing to establish a reasonable tariff +of prices for his service. If the number of patrons is very small, they +cannot make it an object for the man to run his wagon, unless they +will agree to pay a good price for parcels. And the more numerous +the parcels are, the lower will be the rate, within certain limits, that is, +until the man's wagon is fairly loaded, or he has as much business as +he can reasonably attend to. This is on the supposition that all the +business is to come from one place. But if there are intermediate or +contiguous places whose patronage can be obtained to swell the amount +of business, there should be an equitable apportionment of this advantage, +a part to go to the carrier for his additional trouble and fair +profits, and a part to go towards reducing the general rate of charge. +If, however, the carrier has an interest in a place five miles beyond, +which he thinks may be built up by having an express running into it +from Boston, although the present amount of business is too small to +pay the cost, and if, for considerations of his own advantage, he +resolves to run his wagon to that place at a constant loss for the present, +looking to the rise of his property for ultimate remuneration, it would +not be just for him to insist, that the people who intend to establish an +express and support it for themselves, shall yet pay an increased or +exorbitant price for their own parcels, in order to pay him for an +appendage to the enterprise, for which they have no occasion, and +as such he himself undertakes for personal considerations of is own. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page023">[pg 023]</span><a name="Pg023" id="Pg023" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +And if he should be obstinate on this point, they would just let him take +his own way, and charge prices to suit himself, while they proceeded +to make a new bargain with another carrier, who would agree to accommodate +them at reasonable prices adjusted on the basis of their patronage. +And if an appeal should be made to their sympathy or charity, +to help the growing hamlet, they would say, that it was better to give +charity out of their pockets than by paying a high price on their parcels; +for then those would give who were able and willing, and would +know how much they gave. This covers the whole case of arranging +postage as a matter of equal contract. The just measure of charge is, +the lowest rate at which the work can be afforded by individual enterprise +on the best self-supporting routes. Plainly, no other rate can be +kept up by open competition on these routes. And if these routes are +lost by competition, you must charge proportionably higher on the rest, +which will throw the next class of routes into other hands, and so on, +until nothing is left for you but the most costly and impracticable portions +of the work. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The only material exception to this rule would be, where there is +an extensive and complicated combination of interests, among which +the general convenience and even economy will be promoted by establishing +a uniformity of prices, without reference to an exact apportionment +of minute differences. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It can be easily shown, that all these considerations would be harmonized +by no rate of postage on letters, higher than the English 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, +or with us two cents for each half ounce. Considered as a business +question, unaffected by the assumed power of monopoly by the government, +the reasonings of the parliamentary reports and the results of +the British experiment abundantly establish this rate to be the fair +average price for the service rendered. A moderate business can live +by it, if economically conducted, and a large business will make it +vastly profitable, as is seen in the payment of four or five millions of +dollars a year into the public treasury of Great Britain, as the net +profits of penny postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +If we look at the post-office in the more philosophical and elevated +aspect of a grand governmental measure, enjoined by the people for +the good of the people, we shall be brought to a similar conclusion. +The constitutional rule for the establishment of the post-office, is as +follows: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Congress shall have power to—</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Establish post-offices and post-roads.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +This clause declares plainly the will of the people of the United +States, that the federal government should be charged with the responsibility +of furnishing the whole Union with convenient and proper +mail privileges—according to their reasonable wants, and the reasonable +ability of the government. This is one point of the <span class="tei tei-q">“general +welfare,”</span> for which we are to look to congress, just as we look to +congress to provide for the general defence by means of the army +and navy. It imposes no other restrictions in the one case than the +other, as to the extent to which provision shall be made—the reasonable +wants of the people, and the reasonable ability of the government. +It limits the resources for this object to no particular branch of the +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page024">[pg 024]</span><a name="Pg024" id="Pg024" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +revenue. It gives no sort of sanction to the so oft-repeated rule, +which many suppose to be a part of the constitution, that the post-office +must support itself. Still less, does it authorize congress to +throw all manner of burdens upon the mail, and then refuse to increase +its usefulness as a public convenience, because it cannot carry all +those loads. The people must have mails, and congress must furnish +them. To reason for or against any proposed change, on the ground +that the alternative may be the discontinuance of public mails, the +privation of this privilege to the people, and the winding up of the +post-office system, is clearly inadmissible. When the government +ceases to give the people the privileges of the mail, the government +itself will soon wind up, or rather, will be taken in hand and wound +up by the people, and set a-going again on better principles. The sole +inquiry for congress is, what is the best way to meet the reasonable +wants of the people, by means within the reasonable ability of the +government? +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The objects of the post-office system, which regulate its administration, +are well set forth in the Report of the House Committee in +1844: <span class="tei tei-q">“To content the man, dwelling more remote from town, +with his homely lot, by giving him regular and frequent means of +intercommunication; to assure the emigrant, who plants his new home +on the skirts of the distant wilderness or prairie, that he is not forever +severed from the kindred and society that still share his interest and +love; to prevent those whom the swelling tide of population is constantly, +pressing to the outer verge of civilization from being surrendered +to surrounding influences, and sinking into the hunter or savage state; +to render the citizen, how far soever from the seat of his government, +worthy, by proper knowledge and intelligence, of his important privileges +as a sovereign constituent of the government; to diffuse, throughout +all parts of the land, enlightenment, social improvement, and +national affinities, elevating our people in the scale of civilization, and +binding them together in patriotic affection.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These are the objects for which congress is bound to maintain the +post-office, and it is impossible that congress should ever seriously consider +whether they will not abandon them. The maintenance of convenient +mails for these objects is therefore to be regarded as a necessary +function of the government of the United States. In the infancy +of that government, while the government itself was an experiment, +when the country was deeply in debt for the cost of our independence, +and when its resources for public expenditure were untried and +unknown, there was doubtless a propriety in the adoption of the principle, +that the post-office department should support itself. But that +state of things has long gone by, and our government now has ample +ability to execute any plans of improvement whatever, for the advancement +of knowledge, and for binding the Union together, provided +such plans come within the acknowledged powers conferred by the +constitution. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The post-office being, then, like the army and navy, a necessary +branch of the government, it follows that the charge of postage for the +conveyance of letters and papers is of the nature of a tax, as has been +well expressed by the present Postmaster-General, in his last annual +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page025">[pg 025]</span><a name="Pg025" id="Pg025" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +report, quoted above. <span class="tei tei-q">“<em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Postage is a tax</span></em>, not only on the business +of the country, but upon intelligence and knowledge, and the exercise +of the friendly and social affections.”</span> The question before us is, +How heavy a <span class="tei tei-q">“tax”</span> ought the government of a federal republic to +impose on these interests? Every friend of freedom and of human +improvement answers spontaneously, that nothing but a clear necessity +can justify any tax at all upon such subjects, and that the tax +should be reduced, in all cases, to the very lowest practicable rate. +The experience of the British government, the prodigious increase of +correspondence produced by cheap postage, and the immense revenue +accruing therefrom, demonstrate that <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">TWO CENTS</span></span> is not below the +rate which the government can afford to receive. Let the people +understand that all beyond this is a mere <span class="tei tei-q">“tax,”</span> not required by any +necessity, and they will soon demand that the government look for its +resources to some more suitable subjects of taxation than these. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Another rule of right in regard to this <span class="tei tei-q">“tax”</span> is well laid down in +the Report of the House Committee, for 1844: <span class="tei tei-q">“As the post-office is +made to sustain itself solely by a tax on correspondence, it should +derive aid and support from everything which it conveys. No man's +private correspondence should go free, since the expense of so conveying +it becomes a charge upon the correspondence of others; and the +special favor thus given, and which is much abused by being extended +to others not contemplated by law, is unjust and odious. Neither +should the public correspondence be carried free of charge where such +immunity operates as a burden upon the correspondence of the citizen. +There is no reason why the public should not pay its postages as well +as citizens—no sufficient reason why this item of public expenses +should not be borne, like all others, by the general tax paid into the +treasury.”</span> These remarks are made, indeed, with reference to the +franking privilege, which the committee properly proposed to abolish +on the grounds here set forth. But it is plain that the principle is +equally pertinent to the question of taxing the correspondence of the +thickly settled parts of the country for the purpose of raising means +to defray the expense of sending mails to the new and distant parts of +the country. There is no justice in it. The extension of these mails +is a duty of the government; and let the government, by the same +rule, pay the cost out of its own treasury. <span class="tei tei-q">“Postage,”</span> says the same +report, <span class="tei tei-q">“in the large towns and contiguous places, is, in part, a +<em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">contribution</span></em>.”</span> It is a forced contribution, levied not upon the +property of the people, but upon their intelligence and affections. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Our letters are taxed to pay the following expenses: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +1. For the franking of seven millions of free letters. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +2. For the distribution of an immense mass of congressional documents, +which few people read at all, and most of which might as well +be sent in some other way—would be seen the moment they should +be actually subjected to the payment of postage by those who send or +receive them. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +3. For the extension of mails over numerous and long routes, in the +new or thinly settled parts of the country, which do not pay their own +expenses. I do not believe these routes are more extensive or numerous +than the government ought to establish; but then the government +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page026">[pg 026]</span><a name="Pg026" id="Pg026" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +ought to support them out of the general treasury. Many of them are +necessary for the convenience of the government itself. For many of +them the treasury is amply remunerated, and more, by the increased +sale of the public lands, the increase of population, and the consequent +increase of the revenue from the custom-house. And the rest are +required by the great duty of self-preservation and self-advancement, +which is inherent in our institutions. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +4. For the cost of about two millions of dead letters, and an equal +number of dead newspapers and pamphlets, the postage on which, at +existing rates, would amount to at least $175,000 a year, and the +greater part of which would be saved under the new postal system. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Why should these burdens be thrown as a <span class="tei tei-q">“tax upon correspondence,”</span> +or made an apology for the continuance of such a tax? It is +unreasonable. All these expenses should be borne, <span class="tei tei-q">“like all others, +by the general tax paid into the treasury.”</span> This would leave letters +chargeable only with such a rate of postage as is needed for the prevention +of abuses, and to secure the orderly performance of the public +duty. And a postage of two cents would amply suffice for this. +Some have suggested that <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">one cent</span></em> is all that ought to be required. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +There is another view of the matter, which shows still more strongly +the injustice of the present tax upon letters. <span class="tei tei-q">“It is not matter of +inference,”</span> says Mr. Rowland Hill, <span class="tei tei-q">“but matter of fact, that the +expense of the post-office is practically the same, whether a letter is +going from London to Burnet (11 miles), or from London to Edinburgh +(397 miles); the difference is not expressible in the smallest +coin we have.”</span> The cost of transit from London to Edinburgh he +explained to be only one thirty-sixth of a penny. And the average +cost, per letter, of transportation in all the mails of the kingdom, did +not differ materially from this. Of course, it was impossible to vary +the rates of postage according to distance, when the longest distance +was but a little over one-tenth of a farthing. The same reasoning is +obviously applicable to all the <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">productive</span></em> routes in the United States. +And we have seen the injustice of taxing the letters on routes that are +productive or self-supporting, to defray the expense of the unproductive +routes which the government is bound to create and pay for. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Another view of the case shows the futility of the attempt to make +distance the basis of charge. The actual cost of transit, to each letter, +does not vary with the distance, but is inversely as the number of letters, +irrespective of distance. The weight of letters hardly enters into +the account as a practical consideration. Ten thousand letters, each +composed of an ordinary sheet of letter paper, would weigh but one +hundred and fifty-six pounds, about the weight of a common sized +man, who would be carried from Boston to Albany or New York for +five dollars. The average cost of transportation of the mails in this +country, is a little over six cents per mile. For convenience of calculation, +take a route of ten miles long, which costs ten cents per mile, +and another of one hundred miles long at the same rate. There are +many routes which do not carry more than one letter on the average. +The letter would cost the department one dollar for carrying it ten +miles. On the route of one hundred miles we will suppose there are +one thousand letters to be carried, which will cost the government for +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page027">[pg 027]</span><a name="Pg027" id="Pg027" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +transportation just one mill per letter. How then can we make distance +the basis of postage? +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The matter may be presented in still another view. The government +establishes a mail between two cities, say Boston and New York, +which is supported by the avails of postage on letters. Then it proceeds +to establish a mail between New York and Philadelphia, which +is supported by the postage between those places. Now, how much +will it cost the government to carry in addition, all the letters that go +from Boston to Philadelphia, and from Philadelphia to Boston? +Nothing. The contracts will not vary a dollar. In this manner, you +may extend your mails from any point, wherever you find a route +which will support itself, until you reach New Orleans or Little Rock, +and it is as plain as the multiplication table, that it will cost the government +no more to take an individual letter from Boston to Little +Rock than it would to take the same letter from Boston to New York. +The government is quite indifferent to what place you mail your letter, +provided it be to a place which has a mail regularly running to it. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +This brings us to the unproductive routes. An act was passed by +the last Congress to establish mail routes in Oregon territory. An +agent is appointed to superintend the business, at a salary of $1000 a +year and his travelling expenses; contracts are made or to be made, +mails carried, postmasters appointed and paid. This is doubtless a +very proper and necessary thing, one which the government could not +have omitted without a plain dereliction of duty. The honor and +interest of the nation required that as soon as the title to the country +was settled, our citizens who were resident there, and those who shall +go to settle there, should enjoy the benefits of the mail. And as it +was the nation's business to establish the mail, it was equally the +nation's business to pay the expense. No man can show how it is +just or reasonable, that the letters passing between Boston and New +York should be taxed 150 per cent. to pay the expense of a mail to +Oregon, on the pretext that the post-office must support itself. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A mail is run at regular periods to Eagle River, Wisconsin, for the +accommodation of the persons employed about the copper mines on +Lake Superior. Without questioning the certainty of the great things +that are to be done there hereafter, it is no presumption to express the +belief that the expenses of that mail are hardly paid by the postage on +the letters now carried to and from Lake Superior. Nor, after making +all due allowances for the liberal distribution of copper stock at the +East, is it rational to believe that all the people who write letters here, +are so directly interested as to make a tax upon letters the most equitable +mode of assessing the expense. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +During the debates in Congress on the act of 1844, an incident was +related by Senator Crittenden, of Kentucky, to this effect. He said +he was travelling in the mail stage somewhere in the State of Tennessee. +At a time of day when he was tired and hungry, the stage +turned off from the road a number of miles, to carry the mail to a certain +post-office; it was night when they reached the office, the postmaster +was roused with difficulty, who went through the formality of +taking the mail pouch into his hand, and returned it to the driver, saying +there was not a letter in it, and had not been for a month. I will +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page028">[pg 028]</span><a name="Pg028" id="Pg028" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +not inquire whose letters ought to be taxed to sustain that mail route, +but only remark, that whatever consideration caused its establishment, +ought to carry the cost to the public treasury, and not throw it as a +burden upon our letters. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Postmaster-General, in his late report, says that <span class="tei tei-q">“the weight +and bulk of the mails, which add so greatly to the cost of transportation, +and impede the progress of the mail, are attributable to the mass +of printed matter daily forwarded from the principal cities in the Union +to every part of the country;”</span> and <span class="tei tei-q">“justice requires that the expense +of their transportation should be paid by the postage.”</span> I would add +to this the qualifying phrase, <span class="tei tei-q">“or by the government, out of the public +treasury,”</span> and then ask why the same principle of justice is not as +applicable to long mail routes as to heavy mail bags. There is and +can be no ground of apprehension, that mails will ever be overloaded +or retarded by the weight of paid letters they contain. It was found +by the parliamentary committee, that the number of letters, which was +then nearly fifty per cent. greater than in all our mails, might be +increased twenty-four fold, without overloading the mails, and without +any material addition to the contracts for carrying the mails. They +also found that the whole cost of receiving, transporting and delivering +a letter was 76-100ths of a penny, of which the transit cost but +19-100ths, and the receipt and delivery 57-100ths. The cost of +transit, per letter, is of course reduced by the increase of correspondence. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I have dwelt so long on this part of the subject, because I find that +here is the great difficulty in the application of the principles and +results of the British system to our own country—ours is such a +<span class="tei tei-q">“great country,”</span> and we have so many <span class="tei tei-q">“magnificent distances.”</span> +But disposing as I have of the unproductive mail routes, and showing +as I have, the injustice of taxing letters with the expense of any public +burthens, this whole difficulty is removed, and it is made to appear that +two cents is the highest proper rate of postage which the government +can justly exact for letters, on the score either of a just equivalent +for the service rendered, or of a tax imposed for the purposes of the +government itself. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +This is the conclusion to which the parliamentary committee were +most intelligently and satisfactorily drawn—that <span class="tei tei-q">“the principle of a +uniform postage is founded on the facts, that the cost of distributing +letters in the United Kingdom consists chiefly in the expenses incurred +with reference to their receipt at and delivery from the office, and that +the cost of transit along the mail roads is comparatively unimportant, +and determined rather by the number of letters carried than the distance;”</span> +that <span class="tei tei-q">“as the cost of conveyance per letter depends more on +the number of letters carried than on the distance which they are conveyed, +(the cost being frequently greater for distances of a few miles, +than for distances of hundreds of miles,) the charge, if varied in proportion +to the cost, ought to increase in the inverse ratio of the number +of letters conveyed,”</span> but it would be impossible to carry such a rule +into practice, and therefore the committee were of opinion, that <span class="tei tei-q">“the +easiest practicable approach to a fair system, would be to charge a +medium rate of postage between one post-office and another, whatever +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page029">[pg 029]</span><a name="Pg029" id="Pg029" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +may be their distance.”</span> And the committee were further of opinion, +<span class="tei tei-q">“that such an arrangement is highly desirable, not only on account of +its abstract fairness, but because it would tend in a great degree to +simplify and economize the business of the post-office.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Waterston's Cyclopedia of Commerce says, <span class="tei tei-q">“the fixing of <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">a low rate</span></em> +flowed almost necessarily from the adoption of a <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">uniform</span></em> rate. It was +besides essential to the stoppage of the private conveyance of letters. +The post-office was thus to be restored to its ancient footing of an +institution, whose primary object was public accommodation, not +revenue.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The adoption of this simple principle, of Uniform Cheap Postage, +was a revolution in postal affairs. It may almost be called a revolution +in the government, for it identified the policy of the government +with the happiness of the people, more perfectly than any one measure +that was ever adopted. It prepared the way for all other postal +reforms, which are chiefly impracticable until this one is carried. We +also can have franking abolished, as soon as cheap postage shall +have given the franking privilege alike to all. We can have label +stamps, and free delivery, and registry of letters, and reduced postage +on newspapers, and whatever other improvement our national +ingenuity may contrive, to the fullest extent of the people's wants, +and the government's ability, just as soon as we can prevail upon +the people to ask, and congress to grant, this one boon of Uniform +Cheap Postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +V. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Franking.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The unanimity and readiness with which the franking privilege was +surrendered by the members of parliament—men of privilege in a +land of privilege—is proof of the strong pressure of necessity under +which the measure was carried. It is true, a few members seemed +disposed to struggle for the preservation of this much-cherished prerogative. +One member complained that the bill would be taxing him +as much as £15 per annum. Another defended the franking privilege +on account of its benefits to the poor. But the opposition melted +away, like an unseasonable frost, as soon as its arguments were placed +in the light of cheap postage. And the whole system of franking was +swept away, and each department of the government was required to +pay its own postage, and report the same among its expenditures. +The debates in parliament show something of the reasons which +prevailed. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">July 22, 1848.</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> The postage bill came up on the second reading: +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Sir Robert H. Inglis, among other things, objected to the abolition of the franking +privilege. He could not see why, because a tax was to be taken off others, a tax +was to be imposed on members. It would be, to those who had much correspondence, +at least £15 a year, at the reduced rate of a penny a letter. To the revenue +the saving would be small, and he hoped the house would not consent to rescind +that privilege. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The Chancellor of the Exchequer said the sacrifice of the franking privilege +would be small in amount. But at the same time, be it small or great, he thought +there would be not one feature of the new system which would be more palatable to +the public, than this practical evidence of the willingness of members of this house, +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page030">[pg 030]</span><a name="Pg030" id="Pg030" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +to sacrifice everything personal to themselves, for the advantage of the public +revenue. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Sir Robert Peel did not think it desirable that members of this house should retain +the franking privilege. He thought if this were continued after this bill came into +operation, there </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">would be a degree of odium</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> attached to it which would +greatly diminish its value. He agreed that it would be well to restrict in some way the +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">right of sending by mail the heavy volumes of reports</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">. He said there were +many members who would shrink from the exercise of such a privilege, to load the mail +with books. He would also require that each department should specially pay the postage +incurred for the public service in that department. If every office be called upon to pay +its own postage, we shall introduce a useful principle into the public service. There is +no habit connected with a public service so inveterate, as the privilege of official +franking. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +On a former day, July 5, the Chancellor of the Exchequer had said +concerning the abolition of the franking privilege: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +Undoubtedly, we may lose the opportunity now and then, of obliging a friend; +but on other grounds, I believe there is no member of the house who will not be +ready to abandon the privilege. As to any notion that honorable gentlemen should +retain their privilege under a penny postage, they must have a more intense appreciation +of the value of money, and a greater disregard for the value of time, than I +can conceive, if they insist on it. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +All the peculiarities which distinguish British institutions from our +own, might naturally be expected to make public men in that country +more tenacious of privilege than our own statesmen. In a land of +privilege, we should expect mere privilege to be coveted, because +it is privilege. This practical and harmonious decision of British +statesmen, of all parties, in favor of abolishing the franking privilege, +in order to give strength and consistency to the system of cheap postage, +shows in a striking light the sense which they entertained of the +greatness of the object of cheap postage. The arguments which convinced +them, we should naturally suppose would have tenfold greater +force here than there; while the arguments in favor of the privilege +would have tenfold greater influence there than here. Can there +be a doubt that, when the subject is fairly understood, there will +be found as much magnanimity among American as among British +legislators? +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The moral evils of the franking system are far more serious than the +pecuniary expense, although that is by no means undeserving of regard. +It is not only an ensnaring prerogative to those who enjoy it, and an +anomaly and incongruity in our republican institutions, but it is an +oppressive burden upon the post-office, which ought to be removed. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The parliamentary committee ascertained, by three distinct calculations, +(of which all the results so nearly agreed as to strengthen each +other,) that, reckoning by numbers, one-ninth of the letters passing +through the post-office in a year, were franked. And, reckoning by +weight, the proportion was 30 per cent. of the whole. Of seven millions +of franked letters and documents, nearly five millions were by +members of parliament. If all the franks had been subject to postage, +they would have yielded upwards of a million sterling yearly. This +was after the parliamentary franks had been restricted to a certain +number (ten) daily for each member, and limited in weight to two +ounces. The amount of postage on parliamentary franks would be +yearly £350,000, averaging about £310 to each member. But there +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page031">[pg 031]</span><a name="Pg031" id="Pg031" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +were a number of official persons, whose franks were not limited, +either in number or weight. These franks were obtained and used, by +those who could get them, without stint or scruple. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +The celebrated Dr. Dionysius Lardner, who then occupied a prominent place +among men of letters in Great Britain, testified before the parliamentary committee +in 1838, that he was in the practice of sending and receiving about five thousand +letters a year, of which he got four-fifths without postage—chiefly by franks. +While he lived in Ireland, his correspondence was so heavy, not only as to the number +of letters, but their bulk and weight, that he was obliged to apply to the +Postmaster-General of Ireland, Lord Rosse, who allowed them to go under his franks. From +the year 1823, or soon after he quitted the university, until the year 1828, his letters +went and came under the frank of Lord Rosse, who had the power of franking to +any weight. Since he came to England, his facilities of getting franks were very +great. Without such means, he would have found it very difficult indeed to send +his letters by post. His heavy correspondence was chiefly sent through official persons, +who had the power of franking to any weight; and his correspondents knew +that they could send their letters under care to these friends; so that he received +communications from them in the same way. He endeavored to save as much +trouble as he could, by dividing the annoyance among them, and by enclosing a +bundle of letters for the same neighborhood under one cover. He said that, to +obtain these privileges a man must be connected or known to the aristocratic classes, +and that it was certainly unfair, as it gave unfair advantages to those who happened +to have friends or connections having that power. His foreign correspondence was +carried on through the embassies; and in this way the letters came free. He got +his letters from the United States free in that way. Any man who was a Fellow +of the Royal Society, or who lived among that class, could avail himself of these +means of obtaining scientific communications. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The number of franked letters posted, throughout the kingdom, in +two weeks in January, 1838, is stated in the following table. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Week ending</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Country to London.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">London to country.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Country to country.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Total</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">15 January,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">41,196</td><td class="tei tei-cell">43,345</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">36,361</td><td class="tei tei-cell">122,902</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">29 January,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">46,371</td><td class="tei tei-cell">51,046</td><td class="tei tei-cell">37,894</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">135,311</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">———</td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">87,567</td><td class="tei tei-cell">96,391</td><td class="tei tei-cell">74,255</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">258,213</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Proportion,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">.339</td><td class="tei tei-cell">.373</td><td class="tei tei-cell">.287</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1.</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It was stated in the debates, that before the franking privilege was +limited, it had been worth, to some great commercial houses, who had +a seat in parliament, from £300 to £800 a year; and that after the +limitation it was worth to some houses as much as £300 a year. +The committee spoke of the use of franks for scientific and business +correspondence, as <span class="tei tei-q">“an exemplification of the irregular means by +which a scale of postage, too high for the interests and proper management +of the affairs of the country, is forced to give way in particular +instances. And like all irregular means, it is of most unfair and +partial application; the relief depends, not on any general regulation, +known to the public, and according to which relief can be obtained, +but upon favor and opportunity; and the consequence is, that while +the more pressing suitor obtains the benefit he asks, those of a more +forbearing disposition pay the penalty of high postage.”</span> It also keeps +out of view of the public, <span class="tei tei-q">“how much the cost of distribution is +exceeded by the charge, and to what extent therefore the postage of +letters is taxed”</span> to sustain this official privilege. The committee +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page032">[pg 032]</span><a name="Pg032" id="Pg032" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +therefore concluded in their report, that <span class="tei tei-q">“taking into the account the +serious loss to the public revenue, which is caused by the privilege of +franking, and the inevitable abuse of that privilege in numerous cases +where no public business is concerned, it would be politic in a financial +point of view, and agreeable to the public sense of justice, if, on +effecting the proposed reduction of the postage rates, the privilege +of franking were to be abolished.”</span> Only the post-office department +now franks its own official correspondence; petitions to parliament +are sent free; and parliamentary documents are charged at one-eighth +the rate of letters. Letters <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">to</span></em> the Queen also go free. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In our own country, the congressional franking privilege has long +been a subject of complaint, both by the post-office authorities and the +public press. There are many discrepancies in the several returns +from which the extent of franking is to be gathered. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +From a return made by the Postmaster General to the Senate, Jan. +16, 1844, the whole number of letters passing through the mails in a +year is set at 27,073,144, of which the number franked is 2,815,692, +which is a small fraction over 10 per cent. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The annual report of the Postmaster-General in 1837, estimates the +whole number of letters at 32,360,992, of which 2,100,000, or a little +over 6 per cent, were franked. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In February, 1844, the Postmaster-General communicated to Congress +a statement of an account kept of the free letters and documents +mailed at Washington, during three weeks of the sitting of Congress +in 1840, of which the results appear in the following table. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="4"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Week ending</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Letters.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Public Doc.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Weight of Doc.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">May 2,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">13,674</td><td class="tei tei-cell">96,588</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">8,042 lbs.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">June 2,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">13,955</td><td class="tei tei-cell">108,912</td><td class="tei tei-cell">9,076</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">July 7,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">14,766</td><td class="tei tei-cell">186,768</td><td class="tei tei-cell">15,564</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">———</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">42,395</td><td class="tei tei-cell">392,268</td><td class="tei tei-cell">32,689</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Average,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">14,132</td><td class="tei tei-cell">140,756</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">10,896</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Session 33 weeks,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">466,345</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,314,948</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">359,579</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Whole number of Letters and Documents in a session of thirty-three +weeks, 4,781,293. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Average weight of Public Documents, 1-⅓ oz. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Of the 42,375 free letters, 20,362 were congressional, and 22,032, +or 52 per cent. were from the Departments. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In the month of October, 1843, an account was kept at all the +offices in the United States, of the number of letters franked and received +in that month by members of Congress. The number was +18,558, which would give 81,370 for 19 weeks of vacation. To these +add 223,992 mailed in 33 weeks of session, and four-fifths as many, +179,193, for letters received, and it gives a total of 484,555 letters +received and sent free of postage by members of Congress in a year, +besides the Public Documents. The postage on the letters, at the old +rates, would have been $100,000. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +From the same return of October, 1843, it appears that the number +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page033">[pg 033]</span><a name="Pg033" id="Pg033" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +of letters franked and received by national and state officers, was +1,024,068; and by postmasters, 1,568,928; total, 2,592,998, the +postage on which, at 14-½ cents, would amount to $376,073. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These calculations would give the loss on free letters, at that time, +$476,073. This is besides the postage on the public documents, +359,578 pounds, the postage on which, at 2-½ cents per ounce, would +come to $147,581. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Total postage lost by franking, $623,654. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Document No. 118, printed by the House of Representatives of +Massachusetts, 1848, gives $312,500 as the amount of postage on +franked letters, and $200,000 for franked documents, making a total +of $512,500. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of the Post-office Committee of the House of Representatives, +May 15, 1844, contains a return of the number of free letters +mailed and received at the Washington post-office, during the week +ending February 20, 1844, with the corresponding annual number, +and the amount of postage, at the old rates—allowing the average +length of a session of Congress to be six months. From this I have +constructed the following table. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Departments</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Letters</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Letters</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Total No.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Postage.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">received</td><td class="tei tei-cell">sent</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Annually.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">House of Representatives</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,882</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,505</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Senate</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7,510</td><td class="tei tei-cell">10,271</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">——</td><td class="tei tei-cell">——</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total of Congress</td><td class="tei tei-cell">9,392</td><td class="tei tei-cell">11,776</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">550,368</td><td class="tei tei-cell">$114,697</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">President U. S.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">304</td><td class="tei tei-cell">174</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">24,856</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,895</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Post Office</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,041</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,615</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">502,112</td><td class="tei tei-cell">102,474</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">State Department</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,989</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,253</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">220,584</td><td class="tei tei-cell">41,600</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Treasury Department</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,800</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,405</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">478,660</td><td class="tei tei-cell">100,949</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">War Department</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,592</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,626</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">271,336</td><td class="tei tei-cell">61,475</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Navy Department</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,709</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,082</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">197,132</td><td class="tei tei-cell">39,809</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Attorney-General</td><td class="tei tei-cell">52</td><td class="tei tei-cell">816</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">45,136</td><td class="tei tei-cell">10,678</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">——</td><td class="tei tei-cell">——</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">——</td><td class="tei tei-cell">——</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,290,184</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">$476,577</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Whole number of letters franked at Washington: 2,290,184<br /> +Add, franked by members at home: 111,348<br /> +Franked by postmasters: 1,568,928<br /> +Total of free letters: 3,970,450<br /> +Add, franked documents: 4,314,948<br /> +General total number: 8,285,398<br /> +The postage on all which, at the old rates, would be at +least: $1,000,000 +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The annual report of the Postmaster-General, December, 1847, estimates +the number of free letters at five millions, the postage on which, +at present rates, would be at least $375,000, to which the postage on +the documents should be added. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The conclusion of the whole matter is, that the postage due on the +free letters and documents, if reckoned according to the old rates, +would be at least one million, and under the present rates above half a +million of dollars annually; equal to 12 per cent of the whole gross +income of the department. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page034">[pg 034]</span><a name="Pg034" id="Pg034" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +When our present postage law was under consideration, the committees +of both Houses recommended the abolition of the franking +privilege, for reasons of justice, as well as to satisfy the public mind. +The report of the House Committee has this passage: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">As the post-office is made to sustain itself solely by a tax on correspondence, it +should derive aid and support from everything it conveys. No man's private correspondence +should go free, since the expense of so conveying it becomes a charge +upon others; and the special favor thus given, and which is much abused by being +extended to others not contemplated by law, is unjust and odious. Neither should +the </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">public</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> correspondence be carried free of charge, where such immunity +operates as a burden upon the correspondence of the citizen. There is no just reason why +the public should not pay its postages as well as citizens—no sufficient reason why +this item of public expenses should not be borne, like all others, by the general tax +paid into the public treasury.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report of the Senate Committee goes still more fully into the +argument, leading to the same conclusion. In explaining the reasons +for the dissatisfaction with the post-office, then so widely felt by the +people, and the consequent diminution of its revenues, it argues thus: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">immediate</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> benefits of the post-office establishment accruing to that +portion of the people only who carry on correspondence through it, and these enjoying +those benefits in very unequal degrees, according to their various pursuits, habits, or +inclinations, it has seemed to be required by the principles of equal justice that the +expenses of the establishment should be defrayed by contributions collected equally +from each person served by it, in proportion to the amount of service rendered. +The obvious justice of this rule, admitting as it does of so near an approximation to +exact justice in its practical application to the business of this department, has +commended it to all: and, accordingly, the department has always been +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">professedly</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> governed by it: but, unfortunately, so wide has been the +departure from this just and equitable rule in the actual practice, that it has become a +word of promise, kept only to the ear, and broken to the sense. Far from exacting of all +equal contributions towards meeting the necessary expenses of this department in +proportion to the amount of service rendered to each, about one-eighth part numerically, +and probably not less than one sixth part in weight and bulk of the whole correspondence, +has been privileged to pass free of all charge—to say nothing of the immense amount +of public documents conveyed under similar privilege, while the expense of the whole +has been borne by high charges upon the non-privileged part of the correspondence. +It may be said this privilege was granted, and has been extended, from time to time, +for the public service, and in furtherance of the public interest. Admitted; but is +it not perceived that it still involves a palpable violation of the principle of equal +justice, before shown to be at the foundation of all our institutions, and an adherence +to which is indispensable in the conduct of all our affairs? How can it be made +to comport with any just conceptions of right, for the Government to levy so +large a tax, for the common purposes of all, upon a portion only of its citizens? As +well might the post-office be used as a source of general revenue, as to be taxed +specially with the expenses of this branch of the public service—a mode of raising +revenue for general purposes universally admitted to be so unequal and unjust that it has +never been resorted to in this country but in a single instance of extreme necessity, and +then only for a very short time. It is true, the post-office may be, and is in other +countries, successfully resorted to as a means of extorting money from the people; but +this must be where the principles of government are widely different from ours, and +the leading policy being not the promotion of the happiness and welfare of the many, +but the advancement of the few, justifies the use of any means which may subserve +that end. There force and fear, not justice and mutual good will, are the controlling +influences. According to the nature of our government, it might with much more +propriety be asked, by those who use the post-office establishment, that its whole +expense be borne by the general treasury, than that they should be required to +defray the expense of the public service performed in this or any other department; +because it may with truth be urged, that although the advantages of this department +accrue </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">immediately</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> to them, yet mediately at least they inure to the great +benefit of the whole country.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page035">[pg 035]</span><a name="Pg035" id="Pg035" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These objections are of great weight, even under the old or the +present postage. With cheap postage, they ought to be conclusive. +In the language of the English Chancellor of the Exchequer, men who +would then wish to retain the franking privilege <span class="tei tei-q">“must have a more +intense appreciation of the value of money, and a greater disregard for +the value of time, than I can conceive, if they insist on it.”</span> The only +other reason for retaining the privilege would be, that honorable gentlemen, +in the receipt of eight dollars per day for attending to the business +of the nation, would be willing to spend their time in writing +franks at two cents a-piece, for the sake of having their names circulate +through the post-office with the letters M. C. attached to them. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A serious objection to the franking system is, that it unavoidably +tends to constant strife and altercation between members of congress +and the department. The head of the department, naturally and +properly careful of the income of the post-office, sees with pain the +vast encroachment upon the revenue made by the franking system. +He becomes rigid in the construction of the law; he deems every +frank that does not come within its letter an abuse; he adopts the +assumption that franks were only designed for the personal accommodation +of the individual, and not for his family or friends. He watches +to detect some unwarranted stretch, he finds a plenty; he examines a +franked letter, he stops it; complaint is made to the member whose +signature has been treated with disrespect, an explosion follows, the +public service is hindered, and the honor of law is lowered. At this +moment there is a bill pending in congress, to protect the franks of +members, in consequence of a franked letter having been stopped, on +the ground that the direction was not in the handwriting of him who +gave the frank. Any espionage upon men's letters, is plainly an +intolerable grievance in a republican government. The British government +were compelled to allow franks of members to cover all that +was under them, and they therefore restricted them in weight and +number. The only available method for us is to abolish the privilege +itself. The experience under the present postage law proves that it is +impossible to abolish the privilege, except by establishing cheap postage. +The act of 1844 attempted greatly to restrict the franking privilege, +but in three years every material restriction has been practically +done away. There is no middle ground between boundless franking +and no franking. The bill above referred to has passed the senate, in +spite of the most earnest remonstrances of the Postmaster-General, so +that now the frank of a member of congress covers all that is under it, +within the prescribed limit of two ounces weight. Those members +who are so disposed can frank envelopes for their friends, in any number, +and send them in parcels of two ounces, to be used anywhere, +without any more meddling of the post-office clerks. The remedy will +be, to reduce the rate of postage so low, that it will be worth no person's +while to use the franking privilege, or to seek its benefits from +those who hold it; or so that, if it is retained, those who use it will at +least show that they <span class="tei tei-q">“have a more intense appreciation of money, +and a greater disregard for the value of time,”</span> than ordinary persons +can conceive! +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It has been said that it will be impossible to secure the services of +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page036">[pg 036]</span><a name="Pg036" id="Pg036" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +postmasters, without giving them the franking privilege. But it will +be found that the cheap and uniform postage, always prepaid, will so +greatly diminish the labor of keeping the post-office, as to remove the +objection in most cases to taking the trouble. And for the rest, it is +only for the department to demand that, if the people of any neighborhood +wish a post-office they must furnish a postmaster, and this difficulty +is annihilated. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +With regard to the transmission of public documents, printed by +order of the two houses of congress, it is undeniable that very much +of the printing itself, and the circulation of them through the mail, is +a sheer abuse and wanton waste. And it is probable that a great +check would be given to these abuses, if there were an account required +and a charge made on the public treasury of all this circulation, at the +same rate with other pamphlet postage. The circulation, even if kept +up at its present rate, would in fact cost no more than it does now; +but the burden would be taken from the letter correspondence of the +country, and placed where it ought to be, on the general treasury. +The statement of 1844, that four millions of public documents are +circulated in a single session, attracted much attention of the public +press at the time. One influential paper, the New York Journal of +Commerce, has the following remarks under the head of <span class="tei tei-q">“National +Bribery:”</span> +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">It has just been stated in congress, that the two houses had ordered +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">fifty-five thousand copies</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> to be printed, of the Report of the Commissioner +of Patents: and that the cost to the country would be $114,000. This Report is a huge +document, printed in large type, with a large margin, containing very little matter of +the least importance, and that little so buried in the rubbish, as to be worth about as +much as so many </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">needles in a hay-mow.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> Then, this huge quantity of trash, created +at this large expense, is to be </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">franked</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> for all parts of the country, by +way of </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">currying favor and getting votes next time</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, lumbering the mails, and +creating another large expense. We have taken the trouble to weigh the copy of this +document, which was forwarded to us, and find its ponderosity to be 2 lbs., 14 ozs., or, +with the wrapper, about </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">three pounds</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">! The aggregate weight of the 55,000 +copies, is therefore </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-variant: small-caps">eighty-two and a half tons</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">! Eighty-two and +a half tons of paper spoiled; and the nation taxed $114,000 for spoiling it; and then +compelled to lug it to all parts of the Union through the monopoly post-office and the +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">franking</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> privilege! Poor patient people!</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Such taxes, to be defrayed by high postage on letters and newspapers, grow +out of this </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">franking</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> privilege; and the power which congress reserve to +themselves, of distributing free, as many documents as they choose to print at the public +expense! These documents, it seems, are the grand means resorted to by many +members, of </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">currying favor</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> with the influential, and thus +</span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">getting votes next time!</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> ”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A late number of the Boston Courier contains the following humorous +but not untruthful description of this franking business, written by +a correspondent at Washington: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The object of assembling the representatives of the people is +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">discussion</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, not business; or at least, no other business to speak of. And +this is labor enough for any man. Why, one gentleman of the house informed me that he had +2700 names on his list of persons to whom he must send documents, and he is +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">not</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> a candidate for re-election.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Now, let us suppose that the average number of each member's +</span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">document</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> constituency is but 2500, and that each gets </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">four</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> +favors only from his servant in congress. This would throw upon the shoulders of each +member the labor of procuring, and franking, and directing </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">ten thousand</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> +speeches in the course of a session. What more +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page037">[pg 037]</span><a name="Pg037" id="Pg037" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +business than this should be expected of a man? especially, when we consider that the +representative must receive and answer, at length, all sorts of letters, from all sorts +of people, upon all sorts of topics, from Aunt Peg's pension to Amy Dardin's horse. +If each member requires 10,000 speeches to his constituents, somebody has got to +make them. And as there are something over 280 members of both branches there +must be a supply of about </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">three millions</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> of this kind of </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">fodder.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> How +can it be otherwise than that the congressional talking-mill must be kept constantly +going? And what a famine would there be should it stop grinding? Going into a Western +member's room the other day, and seeing him with his coat off in the middle of the +apartment, up to his middle in documents, and speeches, and letters, laboring lustily +with his pen, I alluded to his press of private business.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“ </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Stranger,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> said he, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">I never came to congress before, and I never want to +come again. I tell </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">you</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> that this office of member of congress is not what it +is cracked up to be. I calculated to have a good time here this winter, after racing all +over my district, and making more than five hundred stump speeches in order to get +elected. But the fact is you can see the way I enjoy myself. It is what I call the +enjoyments horribly. Why, sir, I never began to work in this way before in all my +life.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> I asked, </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">How comes on the loan bill in your branch?</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span> <span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">O, they are +spouting away, sir, and here I am franking the speeches. The Lord only knows what is +in them.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span> <span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">And the Ten Regiment Bill?</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span> <span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">I know nothing about it, and don't +want to. Look at them thar letters,</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> pointing to a two bushel basket of private +correspondence—</span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">‘</span><span style="font-size: 90%">not one half of them answered; look at these speeches, not a +quarter of them franked. What attention can I give to loan bills and regiment +bills? Sir, I must attend to my </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">constituents</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">’</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> And we left him to his +labors. Our impression is, that it takes all day Saturday, and Sunday too, to bring up +the franking and letter writing business of the week, for the members seldom get out to +church.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VI. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Letter Postage Stamps, for Prepayment.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In England, as a part of the system devised by Mr. Rowland +Hill, the prepayment of letter-postage is greatly facilitated, and, of +course, the tendency to prepayment is increased, while the management +of the post-office itself, in all its departments, is simplified to +the highest degree, by the use of adhesive postage-stamps. The +stamp is a small oblong piece of paper, with a device upon it, (Queen's +head) so skilfully engraved and printed as almost to defy counterfeiting, +against which indeed the small value of each one, the danger of +speedy detection, and the high penalty for counterfeiting a royal +signet, are equally effective safeguards. The stamp is coated on the +back with an adhesive gum, which securely fastens the stamp to the +letter, by being slightly wet and pressed down with the finger. +These are printed in sheets, and are sold at all post-offices, at precisely +their postal value; 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., +or 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>., as the case may be. The +postmasters purchase them for cash, of the general post-office, and are +allowed a deduction of one per cent for their trouble. The small +shop-keepers of all descriptions, who buy from the post-offices without +discount, generally keep postage-stamps to sell for the accommodation +of their customers and neighbors, just as they would give small change +for a larger piece of money with the same view. Such a shop would +lose favor by refusing to keep stamps to sell. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Each individual buys stamps for his own use, in as great or small +numbers as he pleases, always at the same rate. You keep them on +your writing-desk, along with wafers and wax. You carry a few in +your wallet, ready for use at any place. You seal your letter, and +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page038">[pg 038]</span><a name="Pg038" id="Pg038" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +direct it, and then attach one of these stamps, drop it into the letter-box, +or send it to the post-office, and that wonderful machinery takes +it up, passes it about, finds the owner, and delivers it into his hand, +without any additional charge. Nothing can exceed the simplicity of +the process but the perfection of its working. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +As the current value of these stamps is the same in every part of +the country, and is precisely identical with that of the coin they represent, +they serve as a currency to be used in payment of small sums at +a distance. This is more useful in England than in the United States, +because there they have no bank notes of small denominations. But +even in this country, as soon as they are in general use, they will be +found vastly convenient in making small payments at a distance. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Besides the label stamps, the English post-office manufactures and +sells stamped envelopes, which will at once enclose the letter and pay +the postage. The price of the envelope is half a farthing, in addition +to the 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> for postage; that is, eight stamped envelopes are sold +for 9<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, or 24 for 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> +3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Stamped half sheets of paper are also furnished by the post-office, a +farthing being charged for the paper, besides the 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> for postage. +These are much used for printing circulars, for which they are +very convenient. They are also bought by the poor to write brief +letters on. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is a common practice, in writing to another person on your own +business, to enclose a postage stamp to prepay the letter in reply. +Some persons, who have much correspondence, procure their own +address printed in script on the back of stamped envelopes, and then +send these enclosed to bring back the expected return. Persons doing +a great deal of business with each other, through the post-office, keep +each other's envelopes on hand. The child at school or the son +in college, is furnished with his father's envelopes, stamped and +directed. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The postage stamps are cancelled, by an obliterating stamp in the +office where they are received, so that no postage stamp can ever be +used a second time. Each post-office is furnished with a cancel +stamp, and an ineffaceable ink for this purpose. There are five different +forms of cancel stamps, one used for London letters, deliverable +within the London District, one for letters mailed in London for places +elsewhere, one for all other places in England and Wales, one for +Scotland, and one for Ireland. Thus it is seen at a glance, from what +section a letter comes. Sometimes the stamp denoting the place at +which a letter is mailed, is not sufficiently plain. To meet this, and +to serve some other conveniences, the cancel stamps have a blank in +the centre, in which is inserted the number belonging to that office. +Thus the shape tells the district, and the number the office from which +each letter comes. +The London stamp has a circular blank for letters that are mailed +within the London circle, and deliverable also within it, and a +diamond-shaped blank for letters going out of London. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page039">[pg 039]</span><a name="Pg039" id="Pg039" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The post-offices in each section are all numbered consecutively, +and each office is permanently known in all other offices by its number +as well as its name. Each office has its number engraved in the +blank space of its cancel stamp, as in the first and last above, so that +the place from which the letter comes is known at a glance. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The total number of Label Stamps issued in the year ending +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="3"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. Stamps.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. Stamps.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1841,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">74,856,960</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7,587,960</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1842,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">110,878,344</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,391,800</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1843,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">121,648,080</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,866,080</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">———</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">First three years,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">307,383,384</td><td class="tei tei-cell">13,845,840</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="2"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">321,229,224 stamps, nominal value,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£1,396,146</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Expense of manufacture and distribution,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">42,763</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td><td class="tei tei-cell">———</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Net proceeds,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£1,353,382</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Average yearly,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">451,127</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The present cost of Label Stamps is reported, July 16, 1846, thus: +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="2"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Paper for a million labels,</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£5 11<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Printing and gumming,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">25 --</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Salaries, proportion of,</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">46 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Contingencies, poundage, &c.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">46 + 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">—————</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">———</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Cost per million,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£79 --</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The entire cost of the Stamped Envelopes is thus stated: +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="4"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Year Ending.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Cost.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Sold for.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Profit.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1841,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£4,268</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£4,292</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1842,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,530</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,470</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1843,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,290</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,415</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1844,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,190</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,540</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1845,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,948</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7,261</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total, five years,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£28,229</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£28,978</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£749</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The original cost of the machinery, £435, is divided and apportioned on six years.<br /> +The whole number of envelopes issued is 83,694,240.<br /> +The present cost per million is £359; proceeds, £371; profits, £12.<br /> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Whether it would be advisable for our own post-office to go into the +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page040">[pg 040]</span><a name="Pg040" id="Pg040" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +manufacture of envelopes, may be doubtful. Probably it will be +judged that the Label Stamps would afford all needed convenience, so +far as the government is concerned, and the rest would be left to private +enterprise. From the returns of the actual expense of manufacturing +envelopes, £359 per million—about a mill and three quarters +apiece, it will be seen that there is yet room for individual competition +among us, to bring down the current price to the rate of only a +reasonable profit. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The third assistant Postmaster-General remarks, in his late report, that +the demand for Label Stamps has not been as great as was anticipated, +the amount sold being but $28,330, which would only pay for about +500,000 stamps. This is indeed a very great falling off from the +number purchased in England, which must be not less than two hundred +millions of stamps in the year. He says that <span class="tei tei-q">“many important +commercial towns have not applied for them, and in others they are +only used in trifling amounts. But it should be borne in mind, that +people are more likely to invest a dollar in stamps, when they get fifty +for their money, than when they only get ten or twenty. And when +purchased, they are likely to use them up a great deal more freely, +when they look at each one as only two cents. With so great a convenience +afforded at so cheap a rate, it is not possible but that the +demand must be immense, and the use abundantly satisfactory to the +people and to the department.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +These stamps would obviate the practical difficulty apprehended in +the administration of the cheap postage system, in those parts of the +country where the use of copper coin is not common; as it will always +be easy to purchase stamps with dimes. I do not believe any persons +in this country would be so fastidious on this point, as to be unwilling +to send five letters for the same money that it now costs to +send one. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VII. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">New Arrangement of Newspaper Postage.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The principles of cheap postage have been recognized from the +beginning of our government, in reference to the postage on newspapers—the +charge being regulated, neither by weight nor distance, +but, with a single exception, by the rule of simple uniformity. The +postage on newspapers is one cent for each paper, within 100 miles, or +within the state where printed, and a cent and a half for greater distances. +The act of 1844 allowed all newspapers within 30 miles +of the place where issued, to go free, but this militated so directly +against every principle of equity, that it has been repealed. But cheap +postage on newspapers, for the sake of the general diffusion of +knowledge of public affairs, has always been the policy of our government. +Even during the war of 1812, when it was attempted to raise +a revenue by letter postage, the postage on newspapers was not +raised. No proposition whatever, to increase the cost, or lessen the +facility of the circulation of newspapers by mail, would be sanctioned +by the people, under any conceivable exigency of the government. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Yet it has never been stated, to my knowledge, by any administration, +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page041">[pg 041]</span><a name="Pg041" id="Pg041" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +that the postage of newspapers was any help to the department, +or even that it paid for itself. Many of the unproductive routes, +which add so much to the expense, and so little to the income of the +department, are demanded chiefly for the facility of getting the newspapers, +rather than for letters. We are a nation, of newspaper readers. +It is possible, indeed, that the prodigious increase in the number of +newspapers circulated by mail, which has taken place within twenty +years, and especially within ten years, may have reduced the average +cost of each, so that now the newspapers may be productive, or at +least remunerative. The Postmaster-General states the postage on +newspapers and pamphlets, for the year ending June 30, 1847, at +$643,160, which is an increase of $81,018, or 14-½ per cent. over the +preceding year, and an increase over the annual average of the nine +preceding years, of $114,181, or 21 per cent. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The newspapers passing through the mails annually, are estimated +at 55,000,000. In 1843, they were estimated at 43,500,000, of which +7,000,000 were free. If the calculation is made on the whole number, +the increase is 20 per cent. in four years. But if, as is probable, +the 55,000,000 in 1847 are chargeable papers, the increase is 33-½ per +cent. If anything can make the newspaper postage pay for itself, it +will be the multiplication of newspapers, as it is well known that a +great reduction of cost of individual articles is produced by the great +number required. What fortunes are made by manufacturing cotton +cloth, to be sold at six or eight cents per yard; and by making pins +and needles, which pass through so many processes, and yet are sold +at such a low rate. Each yard of cloth, each needle, each pin, is subjected +to all those several steps, and yet the greatness of the demand +creates a vast revenue from profits which are so small upon each individual +article as to be incapable of being stated in money; the cheapness +of production extending the sale, and the extent of sale favoring +the cheapness of production. An establishment like the post-office +requires a certain amount of expenditure and labor, to keep the machinery +in operation, though the work be but little, not half equal to +its capacity, and it can often enlarge its labors and its productiveness, +without requiring, by any means, a corresponding increase of expense; +and enlarged to a considerable extent, perhaps, without any increase +at all. Thus the cost of the British post-office, which was £686,768 in +1839, when the number of letters was only 86,000,000, was increased +only to £702,310, but little more than 10 per cent. in the following +year, when the number of letters was increased to 170,000,000. +That is, the quantity of business was doubled, while the expense was +only increased one-tenth. And in 1846, when the letters were +322,000,000, or nearly fourfold the former number, the expense was +only £1,138,745, an increase of but 65 per cent., and the greater +part of this—almost the whole—was for increased facilities given, +and not owing to the increased number of letters. Had the cost kept +pace with the increase of business, it would have been, in 1847, nearly +£3,000,000 sterling. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +There is one difficulty, however, in the case of newspapers, arising +from their weight. The Postmaster-General says, in his last report: +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page042">[pg 042]</span><a name="Pg042" id="Pg042" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +<span class="tei tei-q">“The weight and bulk of the mails, which add so greatly to the cost +of transportation, and impede the progress of the mail, are attributable +to the mass of printed matter daily forwarded from the principal cities +of the Union to every part of the country.”</span> Some of these newspapers, +he says, weigh over two and a half ounces each. For more than +twenty years, the weight of newspapers has been a cause of complaint +in the department, for which no remedy has yet been devised, neither +has any man been bold enough to propose to exclude them from the +mails. At one time, rules were made, allowing mail carriers to leave +the newspaper bags, to be carried along at another time. But this +produced too serious a dissatisfaction to be continued. The newspapers +must go, and they must go with the letters, for people are quite +as sensitive at the delay of their newspapers as at the delay of their +letters. Seven or eight years ago, there was a clamor at the weight +of certain mammoth sheets, as the New World and the Brother Jonathan, +weighing each from a quarter to half a pound. But this extravagant +folly of publishers has in a great measure cured itself, and the +grievance has ceased. The law of 1845 undertook to make a discrimination +against papers of exorbitant size, by charging extra postage +on all that were larger than 1900 square inches. I cannot learn +that any papers are taxed at this extra rate, and I venture to predict +that, whenever the public convenience shall be found to require newspapers +of a larger size than 1900 inches, the postage rule will have to +be altered to meet the public demand. The people have so learned +the benefits of uniformity and cheapness of postage on newspapers, +that they will never relinquish it. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Great Britain no difference is made among papers on account of +their weight, although their paper is almost twice as heavy as ours. +And even when a supplementary sheet is issued, the whole goes as one +newspaper, covered by one stamp. I have a copy of the London +Herald, with three supplements, the whole weighing half a pound, +which passed free in the mail, with only the principal sheet stamped. +And the whole comes by the steamer's mail, the postage prepaid by a +single 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. stamp. In that country, however, it is not compulsory +to send newspapers or supplements by mail, and a very large proportion are not +sent in that way, but for convenience by carriers. Their method of circulating +newspapers, by sale instead of yearly subscription, has led to a +difference in this respect. I believe there is no restriction upon the +carriage of newspaper packages out of the mail, by the same contractors, +and the same carriages that convey the mails. It is probable +that the interests of the department would be promoted, rather than +injured, by such a rule, liberally interpreted, in this country. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Twenty years ago, when our mails were all carried in coaches drawn +by horses, there were some routes on which the weight of the newspaper +mails was a serious incumbrance. But at present, so great has +been the extension of steam power, that I question if there is a single +route to which the number of newspapers sent would be a burden, +unless, perhaps, it may be the route by the National Road, from Cumberland +to Columbus. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +So great are the advantages of uniformity of rate, in facilitating the +administration of the post-office, that there would be a greater loss +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page043">[pg 043]</span><a name="Pg043" id="Pg043" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +than gain in attempting to introduce any rule of graduation in the +postage of newspapers. It is easily seen that the difference of distance +is no ground for such graduation, for the same reasons which +are conclusive in regard to letters. And as to the difference of +weight, if you deduct from the one cent postage what it costs to +receive and mail and deliver each paper, and to keep the accounts and +make the returns, the difference in the actual expense is too small to +be made of any practical account, between a newspaper weighing two +ounces and one weighing half an ounce. The Journal of Commerce +and papers of that size weigh less than two ounces. And the number +of newspapers printed on a sheet weighing over two ounces, is too +small to be of any account. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The only point respecting the postage on newspapers, on which the +Cheap Postage Association are inflexibly fixed, is that the postage shall +be uniform, irrespective of distance, and not exceed one cent per +paper, prepaid. If not prepaid, the postage is to be doubled. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is supposed that a practical rule will obtain, like that which now +prevails, of allowing regular subscribers to pay their postage quarterly +in advance, at the office where they receive their papers. Only, the +rule of prepayment will be enforced, because double postage is to be +exacted in all cases where there is not actual prepayment. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It will follow that all occasional papers will pay two cents postage, +that is the same as a letter, unless the postage is prepaid by the sender, +at the office where the paper is mailed. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Great Britain, newspapers are required to be stamped at the +Stamp Office, for which they pay 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. each sheet. And all such +stamped papers are carried in the mails postage free. Whatever be +their date, or how many times soever they may have been mailed, they +always go free by virtue of the stamp. Some attempts have been +made by the post-office to limit the time after date, in which stamped +papers are transmissible free of postage. But the restrictions have all +been borne away by the public convenience and the public will. The +amount received for newspaper stamps, in the year ending January 5, +1844, was £271,180. This goes to the treasury, and not to the +post-office, although the 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. stamp duty was retained solely with +a view to the postage. This sum ought, therefore, in strictness, to be +added to the gross annual receipts of the post-office; and indeed, to +the net income of the post-office, for the whole expense of mailing, +transporting and delivering is included in the yearly expenditures of +the post-office, so that the amount of stamp duty is all gain to the +treasury, saving the trifling cost of stamping. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The cost of stamping paper for the newspapers was stated before +the Parliamentary Committee, by John Wood, Esq., Chairman of the +Board of Stamps and Taxes. He says, <span class="tei tei-q">“A great deal of time is employed +in attaching the stamp to each sheet of paper, because each has +to be separated from the quire or bundle, and the stamp separately +applied to it. I calculate that sheets of paper might be stamped and +delivered in London, at an expense not exceeding 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. per +thousand. In that I include what is called the telling out and telling in, the counting +the paper before it is stamped, the stamping it, the counting it after it +is stamped, and the packing and delivery of it in London.”</span> As to the +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page044">[pg 044]</span><a name="Pg044" id="Pg044" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +question of the liability to forgery, he said that <span class="tei tei-q">“the newspaper proprietors +are all registered at Somerset House, they are all under bond, +and the use of the stamps is confined to comparatively a small number +of persons, so that they are very much under our eye.”</span> This stamp +duty is paid by the publisher, who of course charges a price accordingly +to his subscribers. There is no law against sending newspapers +through any other channel, and no rule requiring them to be sent only +by mail. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is thought that a practice something like this might be introduced +in this country. The plan proposed, is to allow any publisher of a +newspaper to have the paper stamped before printing, for his whole +issue, by paying therefor at the rate of half a cent per sheet. This +would be but half the rate paid by subscribers, at the office of delivery. +But as an offset to this, many sheets would be stamped which would +never be carried by mail. In Boston there are above thirty millions of +newspapers printed yearly. The stamps on all these, if paid in +advance by the publisher, would come to $150,000. I do not suppose +the Post-office Department realizes from all the Boston papers one +hundred thousand dollars. The cost of stamping, even in the British +mode, would be less than a quarter of a mill per sheet. And Yankee +ingenuity would soon devise some labor-saving plan, to reduce the +cost of stamping to ten cents per thousand, or one-tenth of a mill per +sheet. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +This plan would secure the department against losses. It would +greatly increase the business of the post-office, and its income from +newspapers. It would lessen the number of dead newspapers with +which our offices are now lumbered. It would aid in inducing and +helping the publishers of newspapers to get into the cash system of +publication; and thus assist in training the whole community to the +habit of prompt payment. All newspapers, weekly or daily, that have +or expect any thing like a wide circulation by mail, would soon find it +for their interest to fall in with this plan. A weekly paper would pay +26 cents for each yearly subscriber. In what way could he do so +much with the same money to extend and consolidate his subscription +list? A daily paper would cost $1.55 a year for postage. Most daily +papers would find their advantage in paying this, to have their papers +go free, even though they might economize or retrench in something +else. It would greatly facilitate the circulation of intelligence, the +diffusion of knowledge, the settlement and harmonizing of public +opinion, and all in a manner to produce no burden in any quarter +which would be felt. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is demonstrable that the post-office, under its present regulations, +receives but a small part of the papers which are printed. The +Postmaster-general, in his last report, estimates the whole number of +newspapers mailed yearly at 55,000,000, and of pamphlets 2,000,000, +total 57,000,000, yielding to the department only the sum of $653,160. +I have never seen any calculation of the cost of circulating newspapers, +to determine whether the business is profitable to the department +or not. If it pays to circulate newspapers at a cent apiece, surely two +cents apiece is enough to pay on letters, which do not weigh on the +average a quarter as much as newspapers. If it does not pay the cost +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page045">[pg 045]</span><a name="Pg045" id="Pg045" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +to carry newspapers in the mail, then the loss on newspapers ought to +be a tax upon the treasury, and not a tax upon correspondence. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The following table of newspapers and periodicals issued annually +from the Boston press, is given in Shattuck's <span class="tei tei-q">“Census of Boston,”</span> +published by the city in the year 1846. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="4"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Class of Publications.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Number.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Square inches.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Value.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Daily subscription</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,075,320</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,786,029,240</td><td class="tei tei-cell">$106,076</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Daily penny</td><td class="tei tei-cell">11,408,000</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">7,018,617,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">110,400</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Semi-weekly</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,460,448</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,442,010,336</td><td class="tei tei-cell">58,748</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Weekly</td><td class="tei tei-cell">11,610,040</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">8,738,546,856</td><td class="tei tei-cell">334,895</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Semi-monthly</td><td class="tei tei-cell">458,400</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">216,314,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">31,700</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Monthly</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,583,600</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,522,477,200</td><td class="tei tei-cell">127,100</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Two months and quarterly</td><td class="tei tei-cell">37,200</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">143,076,800</td><td class="tei tei-cell">24,500</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Annual</td><td class="tei tei-cell">255,500</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">265,045,300</td><td class="tei tei-cell">31,565</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">————</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">————</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">————</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total</td><td class="tei tei-cell">32,890,508</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">24,132,117,132</td><td class="tei tei-cell">$825,074</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Here are 32,890,508 publications issued annually, averaging 109,098 +daily, and containing 3847 acres of printed sheets, or about twelve +acres per day. The newspapers alone, daily, semi-weekly and weekly, +are 29,555,808, producing $610,119 per annum. Add the semi-monthly +issues, which are mostly newspapers, and you have thirty +millions of newspapers issued in Boston alone, being nearly fifty-five +per cent. of the whole number mailed throughout the union. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A newspaper of the common size, say 38 by 24 inches, or 912 +square inches, will weigh from 1-¼ to 1-⅓ oz. with the wrapper, in the +damp state in which it is usually mailed. The New York Journal of +Commerce, 28 by 46 inches, that is, 1288 square inches, weighs a little +short of 2 oz. as mailed. A lot of 100 papers received in exchange +by a publisher, weighed 1.2 oz., that is less than an ounce and a quarter. +The average weight of all the newspapers published in the +country is believed to be one ounce and a half; which would give +1066 newspapers to every 100 lbs. weight. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The number of newspapers sent by mail was estimated in 1837, by +Postmaster Kendall, as follows: +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="2"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Newspapers paying postage</td><td class="tei tei-cell">25,000,000</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Free and dead papers</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,000,000</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">————</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">————</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Total</td><td class="tei tei-cell">29,000,000</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page046">[pg 046]</span><a name="Pg046" id="Pg046" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The report in 1847, by Postmaster Johnson, estimates the paying +newspapers at fifty-five millions, dead papers two millions, and the +pamphlets two millions, being fifty-nine millions in all; paying postage +to the amount of $643,160, being an increase over the preceding +year, of $81,018. The increase of newspapers in seven years, from +1837 to 1844, by these estimates, was eighty-nine per cent., or at the +rate of about eight and one half per cent. a year. The increase from +1844 to 1847 was about twenty-four per cent. in three years, or eight +per cent. a year. This may be considered the natural rate of increase +of newspapers, without any increase of facilities. It may be reasonably +calculated that the increased facilities offered by this plan will +make the increase of numbers much more rapid. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +And this increase of numbers will by no means be attended with a +corresponding increase of expense to the department. In 1837, when +the number of papers was twenty-nine millions, there were 11,767 +post-offices, and mails were carried 36,228,962 miles. In 1844, the +post-offices were 15,146, an increase of twenty-nine per cent., and the +mail transportation was 38,887,899 miles, an increase of seven per +cent., while the increase of newspapers was eighty-nine per cent.; and +yet the expenditure was $3,380,847 in 1837, and $3,979,570 in 1847; +an increase of less than eighteen per cent. Deducting the necessary +additional expense of adding twenty-nine per cent. to the number of +post-offices, and seven per cent. to the distance of transportation, and +it will be fair to conclude that doubling the number of newspapers +would not add above ten per cent. to the cost of transportation. Make +any reasonable allowance, even fifty per cent. for the labor in the post-offices, +and you have still a net profit of forty per cent. on all the +newspaper postage that shall be added. And this in addition to the +benefits of the diffusion of knowledge, increasing the mutual acquaintance +of the people of this wide republic, and thus increasing the stability +of our government, the permanence of our union, the happiness +of the people, and the perfection of our free institutions. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VIII. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Pamphlet and Magazine Postage</span></span>. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The postage on pamphlets was regulated on the principles of cheap +postage, with a special discrimination in favor of those pamphlets +which were published periodically. This latter distinction was construed +so liberally, that it was allowed to include among periodicals +all pamphlets published annually, such as almanacs, college catalogues, +reports of societies, and the like. The law of 1845 abolishes the distinction +between periodical and occasional pamphlets, but makes a +difference in favor of large pamphlets, by charging two and a half +cents on all pamphlets weighing less than one ounce, and one cent for +each additional ounce. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I have a letter from the proprietor of a quarterly review, stating the +effect which this change in the mode of rating pamphlet postage had +upon its own circulation. Before the act of 1845, the post-office +charged 14 cents per number, or 56 cents a year. Now +it is 10 cents per number, or 36 cents a year. The consequence is, +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page047">[pg 047]</span><a name="Pg047" id="Pg047" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +that where he formerly sent 100 copies by mail, yielding $56 postage, +he now sends 500 copies, paying $180, increasing the income of the +department $124. As there has been a material reduction in the +expenditure of the department, notwithstanding a great extension of +the mail routes, it is plain that the expense to the department is not at +all enhanced by this additional service. As the labor of management +is much diminished in the case of such large pamphlets, it is possible +that future experience may show the practicability of a still greater +reduction in the case of such periodicals—perhaps allowing publishers' +to <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">prepay</span></span> at four cents for each half-pound. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Great Britain, there has hitherto been no separate rate of postage +for pamphlets, but they have been charged at the rate of letter postage, +1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> per half-ounce. This is about double the present rate of +pamphlet postage in the United States. The delivery of parcels by stage-coaches, +railroads, and common carriers, is much more thoroughly +systematized in that old country, with its dense population and limited +extent, than it can be with us, on our vast territory, so new and so +unfinished. Consequently, there is less necessity there for sending +pamphlets by mail, and the thing is rarely done except in the case of +small pamphlets, of an ounce or two weight, or in cases where despatch +in transmission is important. Within the present year, however, a +new rule has been introduced into the British post-office, by which +<span class="tei tei-q">“any book or pamphlet, exceeding one sheet, and not exceeding two +feet in its longest dimensions, may be transmitted by post between any +two places in the United Kingdom, at the uniform rate of sixpence, +prepaid in stamps affixed, for each pound weight and fraction of a +pound. Except in the extreme length of two feet, and that, of course, +no envelope shall contain more than one copy, there is no restriction +whatsoever. Families residing in the remote parts of Scotland, Wales, +and Ireland, where perhaps there is no good bookseller within forty or +fifty miles, may henceforward procure for themselves, direct from London, +Edinburgh, or Dublin, within four or five days at furthest, any +work they may happen to require, from the largest sized Bible or +Atlas, to the most trifling pamphlet or school-book. A delay of twenty-four +hours in the despatch, after posting, is rendered indispensable +by the possibility there is of an overplus of such bulky packages on +particular occasions.”</span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A rate of 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> per pound, is at the rate of .75, or ¾ of a cent +per ounce, being prepaid in all cases. The rate I have proposed for large +periodicals, prepaid, is one-fourth of a cent below this, or less by one-third +of the English rate. It is doubtful whether a lower rate would +be consistent with a due regard to the necessary speed of the mails, +until railroad conveyance shall be more generally extended than it +now is. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +There is one class of pamphlets of extensive circulation, which come +within a liberal construction of a newspaper. But the Postmaster-General, +always vigilant to take care of the pecuniary interests of the +department, has ruled out most of them, to the inconvenience of the +publishers, and the lessening of the income of the post-office. At the +time when there was an attempt to compel the sending of all publications +through the mail, a statement was made in regard to one of +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page048">[pg 048]</span><a name="Pg048" id="Pg048" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +these periodicals, the Missionary Herald, that the postage on 2500 +copies which are regularly sent to New York, would be $1050 a +year; while they are carried by Express for one dollar a month. At this +rate the difference on all the routes would be more than $3000 a year. +The rule was soon altered, and these periodicals were allowed to be +carried through private channels. I think, considering the great numbers +of these publications, and the many important interests connected +with them, there ought to be a rule allowing all periodical pamphlets, +published as often as once a month, and weighing not over three +ounces, to be mailed, if prepaid by the publisher, for one cent each. +This will include, I believe, that highly valuable publication, Littell's +Living Age, and I hope give it a circulation as wide as it deserves. +Almost all the religious denominations in the country have one or more +magazines, cherished by them with much interest, which will obtain +greatly increased circulation and influence in this way. I need not +speak of the desire which every patriot must feel, to secure for our +federal government, by whomsoever administered, the respect and affection +of the religious portion of the people. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I do not know that any complaint is made against this rate of postage, +as regards pamphlets in general. But the fraction of a cent is an +absurdity, on account of the great additional labor it occasions in +keeping accounts and making returns, and settling balances. Few +persons can realize the labor and perplexity occasioned to clerks in the +General Post-Office, by having a column of fractions in every man's +quarterly return which they examine. The simplification of business +would probably save to the department all they would lose by striking +out this paltry fraction, so that the general pamphlet postage will stand +at two cents for the first ounce, and one cent for each additional +ounce. At this rate, the president's annual message, with the accompanying +documents, weighing as sent out about four pounds, would be +65 cents, and the 10,000 copies circulated by congress would bring +the department, if the postage was paid as it ought to be, the pretty +sum of $6500, for only one of the hundreds of documents now sent from +Washington by mail, as a tax upon the letter correspondence of the +country. The postage on the report of the patent-office, in 1845, +mentioned on page 36, would have yielded $27,500 if the postage had +been paid. This is to be added to the $114,000 which it cost to +print the document. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +IX. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ocean Penny Postage.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +For the word and the idea here set down, the world is indebted to +Elihu Burritt, the <span class="tei tei-q">“<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Learned Blacksmith</span></span>,”</span> and +will be indebted to him +for the inexpressible benefits of the thing itself, whenever so great a +boon shall be obtained. Having visited our mother country, on an +errand of peace, he soon saw the value of the blessing of cheap postage, +as it is enjoyed there; and by contrast, through the object of his mission +he say how great is the influence of dear postage, in keeping cousins +estranged from each other, and in perpetuating their blind +hatred, and thus hindering the advent of the days of +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page049">[pg 049]</span><a name="Pg049" id="Pg049" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +<span class="tei tei-q">“Universal Brotherhood.”</span> By putting all these things together, he +wrought out the plan of <span class="tei tei-q">“Ocean Penny Postage,”</span> by which all ship +letters are to pay 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> sterling, instead of paying, as they now +do in England, 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> when sent by a sailing vessel, +and 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> when sent by a +steam packet. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +He proposes that each letter shall pay its postage penny in advance +for the service it may receive inland, and a like sum, also in advance, +for its transmission by sea, until it shall arrive at its port of destination. +To this should be added, as fast as penny postage shall be propagated +in other countries, an international arrangement for prepaying the +inland postage of the country to which the letter is sent. Nothing can +be more simple in theory than such an arrangement, nothing easier +or more unerringly just in execution. It would make the postage +stamps of the cheap postage nations an international currency, better +than gold and silver, because convertible into that which gold and +silver cannot buy, the interchange of thought and affection among +friends. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In pressing his project first on the British nation, both because he +happened to be then commorant in England, and because that government +and not ours had already adopted cheap postage as the rule +for its home correspondence, he is not chargeable with any lack of a +becoming respect for his own country. I confess, however, that I feel +strongly, what he has not expressed, the desire that my own country +should have both the honor and the advantage of being the first to +carry out this glorious idea. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Mr. Burritt states the number of letters to and from places beyond +sea in 1846, through six of the principal seaports of England, at +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="2"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">8,640,458</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Number of newspapers</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,698,376</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Gross revenue from letters and papers,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£301,640</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Letters sent to and from the United States,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">744,108</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Newspapers</td><td class="tei tei-cell">317,468</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Postage on letters and papers,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£46,548</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Whole expense of packet service,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£761,900</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In addition, he has been so fortunate as to enlist the cöoperation of +a distinguished member of parliament, of whom he says: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">At my solicitation he readily moved for a return of all the letters, newspapers, +magazines, pamphlets, &c., transmitted from the United States in 1846, and which +have been refused on account of the rates of postage, and are consequently lying +dead in the English post-office; also for a return of the amount of postage charged +upon this dead mail matter. I am pretty confident that this return will startle the +people and government with some remarkable disclosures with regard to the amount +of mail matter conveyed across the ocean, for which John Bull does not get a +farthing, because he asks too much for the job.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +By the arrangement of the British Post-office, the postage on letters +by the mail steamers to the United States is now 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> per half +ounce; and on newspapers 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> each paper. On all letters and +papers sent from Great Britain the postage must be prepaid. If not prepaid, they are +not sent; but in the case of letters, it is the practice of the post-office +to notify persons in this country to whom letters are addressed, that +cannot be forwarded for the want of prepayment, that they can have +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page050">[pg 050]</span><a name="Pg050" id="Pg050" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +their letters on procuring the prepayment of the required shilling. I +have more than once received a printed notice of this kind, designating +the number by which my letter could be called for. No additional +charge is made for this piece of attention. This fact is significant of +the spirit of the cheap postage system. No provision is made by +which postage can be prepaid in this country, and consequently, the +whole expense of correspondence falls upon the parties in England. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Mr. Burritt enumerates some of the inconveniences of the present +system, in addition to the positive evil of a burdensome tax upon the +letter correspondence between the two countries—a tax which +amounts to a suppression of intercourse by letter, to a sad extent. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +1. The present shilling rate of postage, being exacted on the English side, too, +in all cases, and thus throwing the whole cost of correspondence upon the English +or European correspondents, greatly diminishes the number of letters which would +otherwise be transmitted to and from America, through the English mail. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +2. In consequence of the present high rate of postage on letters, newspapers, +pamphlets, magazines, &c., a large amount of mail matter conveyed across the +ocean, lies </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">dead</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> in the English post-office—a +dead loss to the department—the persons +to whom it is addressed, refusing to take it out on account of the postal charges +upon it. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +3. Under the present shilling rate, it is both legal and common for passengers to +carry a large number of </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">unsealed</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> letters, +which are allowed as letters of introduction, +and which, at the end of the voyage, are sealed and mailed in England or America, +to persons who thus evade the ocean postage entirely. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +4. In consequence of the present shilling rate, it is common, as it is legal, for +persons to enclose several communications, addressed to different parties, under one +envelope, which, on reaching America or England, are remailed to the persons +addressed, thus saving to them the whole charge of Ocean Postage. Paper is manufactured +purposely to </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">save postage</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, and, for this quality, is called </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Foreign +Post.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +He also tells the people of England very plainly what will be the +effect if <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">they</span></em> first adopt the Ocean Penny Postage. <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Some</span></em> of +the same considerations ought to have weight with American citizens and American +philanthropists, and especially with American statesmen, in producing +the conviction, that it is better for the United States to lose no +time in adopting this system. +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +1. It would put it into the power of every person in America or England to write +to his or her relatives, friends, or other correspondents, across the Atlantic, as often +as business or friendship would dictate, or leisure permit. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +2. It would probably secure to England the whole carrying-trade of the Mail +matter, not only between America and Great Britain, but also between the New +World and the Old, forever. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +3. It would break up entirely all clandestine or private conveyance of Mail matter +across the ocean, and virtually empty into the English mail bags all the mailable +communications, even to invoices, bills of lading, &c.; which, under the old system, +have been carried in the pockets of passengers, the packs of emigrants, and in +the bales of merchants. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +4. It would prevent any letters, newspapers, magazines, or pamphlets, from lying +dead in the English post-office, on account of the rates of postage charged upon them, +and thus relieve the department of the heavy loss which it must sustain, from that +cause, under the present system. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +5. It would enable American correspondents to prepay the postage on their own +letters, not only across the ocean, but also from Liverpool or Southampton to any +post town or village in the United Kingdom; to prepay it also, to </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">England</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%">, +by putting two English penny stamps upon every letter weighing under half an ounce. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +6. It would bring into the English mail all letters from America directed to +France, Germany, and the rest of the continent, and </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">vice versa</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">. +</span></div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page051">[pg 051]</span><a name="Pg051" id="Pg051" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +7. It would not only open the cheapest possible medium of correspondence +between the Old World and the New, but also one for the transmission of specimens +of cotton, woollen, and other manufactures; of seeds, plants, flowers, grasses, +woods; of specimens illustrating even geology, entomology, and other departments +of useful science; thus creating a new branch of commerce as well as correspondence, +which might bring into the English mail bags tons of matter, paying at the +rate of 2</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">s.</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> 8</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">d.</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> per lb. for carriage. +</span></div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%"> +8. It would make English penny postage stamps a kind of international currency, +at par on both sides of the Atlantic, and which might be procured without the loss +of a farthing by way of exchange, and be transmitted from one country to the other, +at less cost for conveyance than the charge upon money orders in England from one +post-office to another, for equal sums. +</span></div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +One of the strongest recommendations of this measure, and a +weighty reason also in favor of the immediate adoption of the whole +system of cheap postage, is found in the present derangement of postal +intercourse between Great Britain and the United States. These two +great nations, the Anglo-Saxon Brotherhood, are at this moment <span class="tei tei-q">“trying +to see which can do the other most harm,”</span> by a course of mutual retaliation, +which may be known in future history as the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">war of posts</span></span>. +It is the opinion of some philosophers, that in wars in general, the party +most to blame is the one which gives the heaviest blows; but in this +case there arises a new problem, whether each particular blow does the +most damage to the party which receives or to the one that gives it. +The principal points in the contest I suppose to be these. The American +government charges Great Britain five cents postage on all letters +in the British packet mails, borne across our country at the expense of +Great Britain, to and from the province of Canada. Great Britain in +return, charges the United States the full rate of ship postage on all +letters in the American packet mails, which touch at a British port on +their way to and from the continent of Europe. Then the Postmaster-General +of the United States suspends the agreement by which a mutual +postage account is kept between his department and the post-office +in Canada. And now a bill is before Congress, having actually +passed the House of Representatives in one day, by which our own citizens +are to pay 24 cents postage on every letter, and 4 cents on +every newspaper, brought by the British mail steamers, as a tax to our +own post-office, although the same postage has already been prepaid +by the sender in England. The tax thus imposed on our own people, +in the prosecution of this postal war, will amount to $178,586 a year, +no small burden upon a subject of taxation so sensitive as postage, and +no trifling obstruction to the intercourse between the two countries, +and between the emigrants who find a refuge on our shores and the +friends they have left behind. Such a stoppage is peculiarly to be +regretted at this juncture, when the number of emigrants is so rapidly +increasing, and all the interests of humanity seem to require the utmost +freedom and facility of intercourse between the United States and the +European world. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The proposed bill is intended as a retaliatory measure, and perhaps +nothing can be devised more severe in the way of retaliation. It is +worthy of inquiry, however, whether there may not be found <span class="tei tei-q">“a more +excellent way,”</span> by means of cheap postage on the ocean as well as on +the land. It does not appear but that Great Britain can stand the +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page052">[pg 052]</span><a name="Pg052" id="Pg052" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +impost of double postage as easily and as long as we can. But let our +government open its mails to carry letters by steam packet between +Europe and America for TWO CENTS, and I do not see how Great +Britain can stand that. She must succumb. A man who thought he +had been injured and was meditating plans of revenge, happened to +open his Bible and read the counsel of the wisest of human rulers,—<span class="tei tei-q">“If +thine enemy hunger, feed him, and if he thirst, give him drink, for +in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.”</span> The man +mused a few minutes, and then rose and clapped his hands, and said, +<span class="tei tei-q">“I'll burn him.”</span> Without touching the merits of the controversy as +to which did the first wrong, I must say that the course of the British government, +in exacting 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> per letter on the mails of the American +steamers bound to Germany, for barely touching at the port of Southampton, +is the most <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">gouging</span></em> affair of any governmental proceeding +within my knowledge. It seems to me that our own government +would do itself honor by adopting almost any expedient, rather than +imitate so bad an example, in this age of the world, as to lay a tax +amounting to a prohibition, upon the interchange of knowledge and the +flow of the social affections among mankind. It is submitted that the +establishment of Ocean Penny Postage by our mail steamers, with an +offer of perfect reciprocity to all other countries adopting the same +policy, will be quite consistent with our national honor. With the +interest which this subject has already acquired in the British nation, +and the apparent disposition of that government to yield to the well-expressed +wishes of the people, there can be no doubt that this would +lead to an immediate adjustment of the pending controversy. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The only remaining question respecting Ocean Penny Postage is the +statesmanlike and proper one, <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">How is the expense to be paid?</span></em> In the +first place, the government would not be required to pay any more +money for the transportation of its mails than they pay now. This +great boon can be given to the people without a dollar's additional +cost. Our own experience under the postage act of 1845, proves this. +While the number of letters is doubled, the whole expense of the post-office +is diminished—especially that part which might most naturally +be expected to increase, that is, the transportation of the mails. The +freight of a barrel of flour, weighing 200 pounds, is about fifty cents. +Of course, the equitable price of ten thousand letters added to any +given mail, which would not weigh so much as a barrel of flour, would +make no assignable difference in the cost upon a single letter. As +both sailing ships and steam packets are becoming multiplied, individual +competition may now be relied on to keep the price of transportation +of mails from ever rising above its present standard. The +increase of the number of letters makes but very little addition to the +aggregate expense of the post-office. In the first year of the penny +postage in England, there were ninety-three millions of letters added +to the mails, and only £70,231 to the whole expenditure of the department, +including the cost of introducing the new system, with all its apparatus. +This amounts to 0.181<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>; less than two-tenths of a penny +each for the added letters. In 1844, there were 21,000,000 letters +added to the circulation, and not a farthing added to the cost. These +letters yielded about £90,000 in postage, every penny of which went +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page053">[pg 053]</span><a name="Pg053" id="Pg053" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +as net gain into the treasury. I have no means of stating how much +of the £450,000 added to the yearly expenditure of the British Post-office, +is chargeable to the great increase of facilities and accommodations, +both of the public and of the department; but have understood +that by far the greater part of it arises from this, and not properly +from the mere increase of letters. It may be safely assumed that, for +any number of letters now added to the mails in Great Britain, the +additional expense will not exceed half a farthing each letter, and the +rest will be clear profit to the post-office. As the plan of Ocean +Penny Postage includes also the inland postage prepaid in each +country, it follows that each country would realize from three-quarters +to seven-eighths of a penny advantage on every letter added to the +present ocean mails. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In addition to all this, there is just as much reason to expect Ocean +Postage to increase, as to expect land postage to increase. And as it +is proved that, on land, the reduction of price will increase the consumption, +so as to produce an equal income, there can be no doubt +that, in a little while, if the sea postage is reduced to the cheap standard, +the letters and papers sent will increase sufficiently to yield an equal +income. And if so, the consequent increase of inland postage and the +profits on the same will be clear gain. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Add to the immense number of Europe-born people now living in +the United States, the children of such, who will retain for two or +three generations, their relationship to kindred remaining in the Old +World: Add to the half million of European emigrants, who by ordinary +calculation would be expected every year, the numbers whom +passing events will drive to seek an asylum from European revolutions +under the peaceful and permanent government of the American Union: +Add to the increase of transatlantic intercourse arising from the +increase of commerce, the growth also of advancing civilization and +intelligence: Add to the interest which emigration of neighbors and +the growth of the country gives to European residents in a correspondence +with America, the eager desire which the new times now +begun must create to become more familiarly conversant with the new +world, whose path of freedom and equality the old countries are all +striving to follow: How long will any man say it would take, with a +rate of postage across the Atlantic not exceeding two cents per half +ounce, before there would be ten millions of letters yearly, instead of +three-quarters of a million, the number now carried by the British +packet mails? And these would yield more postage than can now be +collected at a shilling a letter, besides the profit they would yield on +the inland postage. With our own experience under the act, of 1844, +and the experience of Great Britain under the act of 1839, it would +be unphilosophical to set a longer time than five years as the period +that would be required to bring up the product of Ocean Postage to +its present amount. And the healthy spring which such a reform +would give to commerce, and to every source of national prosperity, +and its consequent indirect aid to the public revenues, would justify +any government, on mere pecuniary considerations alone, in assuming +a heavy expenditure, not only for five years, but permanently, to secure +so great an object. I address to my own country, as the nation +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page054">[pg 054]</span><a name="Pg054" id="Pg054" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +whom it more appropriately belongs to take so great a step towards +universal brotherhood, the fervid appeal which my friend Burritt has +made to England: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The irresistible genius and propagation of the English race are fast +</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Anglicizing</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%"> +the world, and thus centering it around the heart of civilization and commerce. +Under the sceptre of England alone, there live, it is said, one hundred and forty +million of human beings, embracing all races of men, dwelling between every two +degrees of latitude and longitude around the globe. And there is the Anglo-American +hemisphere of the English race, doubling its population every twenty-five years, +and propelling its propagation through the Western World. And there is the +English language, colonized, not only by Christian missions, but by commerce, in +every port, on every shore, accessible to an English keel. The heathen of China +or Eastern Inde, whilst buying sandal wood for incense to their deities from English +or American merchantmen, or trafficing for poisonous drugs; the sable savages that +come out of the depth of Africa, to barter on the seaboard their glittering sand, +their ivory, ostrich feathers or apes, for articles of English manufacture; the Red +Indians of North and South America, as they come from their hunting grounds in +the deep wilderness, to sell their spoils to English or American fur companies; the +swarthy inhabitants of the ocean islands, as they run to the beach to greet the American +whale ship or the English East Indiaman, bringing yams and curious ware to +sell to the pale-faced foreigners; all these carry back to their kind and kindred rude +lessons in the English language—the meaning of home and household words of the +strong, old Saxon tongue, each of which links its possessor to the magnetic chain of +English civilization.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">What then, should England do, to bring all nations of men within the +range of the vital functions of that heart-relation which she sustains to the world?</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">Answer—let her establish an </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">Ocean Penny Postage</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%">.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +X. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">The Free Delivery of Letters and Papers in Large +Towns</span></span>. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The simple adoption of Uniform Cheap Postage would hardly fail +of securing, in the end, all other desirable postal reforms. An act of +congress, in five lines, enacting that <span class="tei tei-q">“hereafter the postage on all letters +prepaid, not exceeding half an ounce in weight, shall be two +cents; and for each additional half ounce, two cents; and if not prepaid +the postage shall be doubled,”</span> would at no distant period, bring +in all the other desired improvements. The adoption of cheap postage +in Great Britain, greatly improved the system of local delivery of letters +and newspapers in the large towns. Formerly, an additional charge of +1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> was made for the delivery of letters by carriers, in the case +of letters that had been mailed; and for <span class="tei tei-q">“drop letters,”</span> or letters delivered +in the same town where they are posted, the price was 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> Now +all drop letters are charged at the uniform rate of 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> the same +as mail letters; and the mail letters are delivered by carriers without +additional charge—the penny postage paying all. The Postmaster-General +prescribes what places shall have the free delivery, and how +far it shall extend around each post-office. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Beyond those limits, and in places where the free delivery is not +judged practicable, the local postmasters are at liberty, on their own +discretion, to employ penny-post carriers to deliver letters at the houses +of the people, charging 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> each for delivery, which is a private +perquisite—the department taking neither profit nor responsibility +in the case. Persons who do not choose to pay the penny-post can +refuse to receive letters in that way, and obtain them by calling at the +post-office. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page055">[pg 055]</span><a name="Pg055" id="Pg055" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +To facilitate this local free-delivery, there are <span class="tei tei-q">“receiving houses”</span> +established at convenient distances in the town, where letters are +deposited for the mails, without a fee, and thence are taken to the +post-office in season for the daily mails, or for distribution through the +local delivery. These receiving houses are generally established in a +drug or stationery store, grocery, or some retail shop, where the nature +of the business requires some one to be always in attendance, and +where the increase of custom likely to arise from the resort of people +with letters is a sufficient consideration for the slight trouble of keeping +the office. The letters are taken to the post-office at stated hours, +by persons employed for that purpose; those which are to be mailed +are separated, and those which are for local delivery sorted and delivered +to the carriers to go out by the next delivery. I have not a +list of the number or size of the cities and towns within which the free +delivery is enjoyed. Its necessary effect in increasing the number of +letters sent by mail, and benefiting the country and the government +by the aid it furnishes to trade and general prosperity, would seem to +be a guaranty that the department would be likely to extend the free +delivery as far as it could possibly answer, within the reasonable +ability of the government, to meet the reasonable wants of the people. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The London District Post was originally a penny post, and was +created by private enterprise. One William Dockwra, in the reign of +Charles II., set up a private post for the delivery of letters in the city of London, +for which the charge was 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., payable invariably in advance. +It was soon taken possession of by the government, and the +same rate of postage retained until 1801, when, for the sake of +revenue, the postage was doubled, and so remained until the establishment +of the general penny postage. Its limits were gradually extended +to include the city of Westminster and the borough of Southwark, +then all places within a circle of three miles, and finally to twelve +miles from the General Post-Office. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Within the three miles circle there are 220 receiving houses, of +which 180 are within the town portions of the district. At these +offices, letters are despatched to the post-office, ten times daily, viz. +at 8, 10, and 12, in the morning, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, in the afternoon. +Letters are required to be left at the receiving house a quarter +of an hour previous to the hour. The letters so left may be expected +to be delivered within the three miles circle in about two hours from +the hour at which they are sent to the post-office; that is, the 8 o'clock +letters are delivered by 10, and so on. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +There are now ten deliveries daily, within a circle of three miles +from the post-office; five deliveries in a circle of six miles, and three +deliveries to the circle of twelve miles distance. In the three miles +circle, the delivery is completed in one hour and a quarter from the +time the carrier leaves the office; in the six miles circle, in two hours, +and in the twelve miles circle, in three hours. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page056">[pg 056]</span><a name="Pg056" id="Pg056" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In 1839, the estimated average of letters passing through the London +district post was about one million every four weeks, of which +800,000 or four-fifths were unpaid. In 1842, the average was two +millions in four weeks, of which only 100,000, or one-twentieth, were +unpaid—ninety-five per cent. being prepaid. In 1847, the number +was nearly three millions. These do not include the <span class="tei tei-q">“General Post;”</span> +that is the country and foreign letters to London, but only those that +originate as well as end within the twelve miles circle. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The General Post letters, however, are distributed on the same +principle of free delivery, without extra charge, and the utmost +diligence is used by the letter-carriers to find out the persons to whom +letters are directed. I was witness to this, in the case of a gentleman +from Ohio, who went to England in a merchant ship, without having +taken the precaution to give his family any instructions as to the +direction of letters. His voyage was somewhat long, and before he +had been three days in London, the carrier brought to his lodgings a +letter from his wife, which had come in the mail steamer, and the +people at the post-office had sought him out, an entire stranger among +two millions of people! The General Post letters passing through the +London office, were estimated in 1839 at 1,622,147, each four weeks, +of which only one-sixth were prepaid. In 1847, they were 8,500,000, +of which above ninety-four per cent. were prepaid. This makes the +whole number of letters mailed and delivered in London, equal to +above 146,000,000 a year; of which it is reasonable to calculate that +about 75,000,000 are distributed by the letter-carriers by Free +Delivery. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +As nineteen-twentieths of the letters are prepaid, the delivery is +accomplished with great despatch. The greater proportion of them, +of course, go to those who are in the habit of receiving numbers of +letters daily, and with whom the carriers are well acquainted. A +large proportion are delivered at counting-rooms and shops, which are +open. Most houses where letters are received daily, have letter-boxes +by the door, fitted with an ingenious contrivance to guard against robbery, +into which prepaid letters can be dropped from the street, to be +taken out by a door that is locked on the inside. Thus the great +bulk of the letters are delivered with little more trouble or loss of time +to the carrier, than it takes to serve the daily newspaper. The cases +are also much more numerous than with newspapers, where many +letters are deliverable at one place, which of course lessens the amount +of labor chargeable to each one. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page057">[pg 057]</span><a name="Pg057" id="Pg057" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +There are ninety-five bell-men, who call at every door in their several +districts once a day, and take letters to the post-office in time for +the evening mails. Each one carries a locked bag, with an aperture +large enough to drop in a letter, which can only be opened at the +post-office. Any person having letters to go by mail, may drop them +into this bag, pay the bell-man his fee of 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., and be quite sure +they will be despatched the same evening. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +All these carriers are required to assist, at stated times, in the +sorting of letters, both for the free delivery and for the mails. They +are paid by a stipulated salary, and have a permanent business, with +chances for advancement in business and wages, according to length +of service and merit. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A letter was addressed through the newspapers to the Postmaster-General +of the United States, by Barnabas Bates, Esq., of New York, +one of the most able and efficient advocates of postal reform, bearing +date February 7, 1847, urging the adoption of a similar system for the +city of New York, and other cities—the postage to be in all cases +prepaid. The advantages to be anticipated are thus set forth by Mr. +Bates: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The adoption of this plan will ultimately be a source of revenue +to the post-office department.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">1. It will be the means of diminishing the number of dead letters and +newspapers, which is increasing every day to an incredible amount. The carriers will not +carry out letters or papers where there is any doubt of getting their pay, consequently +the number of advertised letters is daily increasing, and as for dead newspapers, +they are sold by cart loads. Half a cent is not a sufficient inducement to carry +out newspapers, especially if there be any doubt of getting the postage; hence the +many complaints of editors that their subscribers do not get their papers.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">2. It will reduce the list of advertised letters which has increased +within a few years more than three hundred per cent. The Sun and Tribune of last +Saturday, advertised 1700 letters, which cost sixty-eight dollars; if this be the +average weekly number, the post-office department or the people must pay for advertising, +the sum of three thousand five hundred and thirty-six dollars per annum! The list of +advertised letters of the Boston post-office, which is semi-monthly, averages from +fourteen to sixteen columns of the Boston Times. If efficient carriers were appointed to +deliver these letters to their address free of expense, this list would be reduced more +than one half; thus a saving would be made in advertising, besides the collection of +a large amount of postage. I would further remark, that requiring </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">four +cents</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> to be paid for advertising, in addition to the postage, frequently deters +poor people from taking out their letters, and thus the cost of advertising, as well as +the postage, are lost to the General Post-office. An efficient free delivery would save +the department thousands of dollars every year.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">3. A free delivery of letters would increase the revenue by causing the +greater portion of the drop letters to be sent through the post-office, instead of the +private offices now established in different parts of the city. The only reason why the +City Despatch Post failed was, that they charged more than the private penny post +offices. But if these letters were delivered free, charging only two cents as drop +letters, nearly all the city correspondence would be conveyed through this medium. The +increased income from this source alone would in a short time be amply sufficient to +pay the salaries of all the carriers.</span></span> +</div> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">4. The post-office would not only command all the drop letters, but afford such +easy, safe, and cheap facilities for the conveyance of letters, that it would be the +means of increasing the city and country correspondence to an extent which can +hardly be estimated. Thousands and tens of thousands of letters which are now +sent by private hands, or through the private penny post, would then be deposited +in the United States sub post-offices, both for city delivery and to be forwarded by +the mails.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page058">[pg 058]</span><a name="Pg058" id="Pg058" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The extent to which such a system of Free Delivery could properly +be introduced in this country, can only be determined by experiment. +That is, to decide in how many and what towns there shall be a Free +Delivery, and how far from the post-office the Free Delivery shall be +carried, experience must be the guide. A city and its suburbs might +all be included in one arrangement, as New York with Brooklyn, +Williamsburg, and Jersey City; Boston with Charlestown, Cambridge, +Chelsea and Roxbury; and as population increases and intercourse +extends, other places might be included. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Such a system would make a vast amount of business for itself, as +people learned the advantages of so easy a correspondence—especially +in those places which may admit of two or more deliveries a day. +It would also tend to facilitate and stimulate and increase the general +business of the place, and this would in turn increase the business of +the post-office. The establishment of Free Delivery in any city or +large town, would tend to increase the correspondence of the country +with such town. Every addition to the number of letters delivered, +would lessen the average cost of delivery of each letter, and thus +increase the net profits of the institution. In these ways the department +would feel its way along, in the extension of Free Delivery from +one class of towns to another, until, at no distant day, it would be +found that its benefits were far more widely diffusible than the most +sanguine could now anticipate. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +On the subject of the cost of delivery, the parliamentary committee +obtained many valuable items of information. Mr. Reid, of London, +said he got a thousand circulars delivered lately, for a foreigner. The +gentleman had intended to send them through the post-office, paying +the postage. Mr. Reid told him he would get them delivered a great +deal cheaper. He gave them to a very trusty person, who delivered +them all in the course of a week, at the expense of £1 +2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. They +were certain he delivered them; for nearly every time they sent him +out, they took care to misdirect two or three, taking an account of the +false direction, and he invariably brought back these letters, because +he could not find the persons to whom they were directed. The postage +of these circulars, at 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. would have been +£4 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. Here was +a saving of £3 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. +in one job. The expense of delivery was 1-1/14 farthing +per letter. Of course, regular carriers, in their accustomed +routes, could deliver prepaid letters at a much cheaper rate than +this. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +During the parliamentary investigations on the subject of cheap +postage, a plan was suggested, of establishing what were called +secondary mails, to reach every village and hamlet in the country. +These secondary mails were to run from each post-town to the surrounding +places, and deliver letters for an additional charge of 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. +But on consideration it was found impracticable to clog the general +system with this addition. Uniformity was everything, to the system. +And they could not establish any uniform rate which would answer +both for the post-towns and for the hamlets. The rate which would +pay for the towns, would not pay for mails to the hamlets. And the +rate which was necessary for the hamlets, was too high for the towns, +and <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">the contraband conveyance would still continue</span></em>. Consequently, +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page059">[pg 059]</span><a name="Pg059" id="Pg059" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +the post-office would have to distribute the letters to the smaller +places, where the distribution is attended with the greatest cost and +the smallest profits. In the end, the rule of uniformity was left unbroken, +and it was left to future experience or local arrangement to +meet the wants of the smaller places, not now reached by the mails. +The local postmasters are to make such arrangements as they deem +proper in their respective neighborhoods, as to the employment of +penny-post carriers to distribute the letters at the houses of the +people. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +To show the working of multiplication and division in the increase +of profits, and the very low rate at which a service similar to that of +free delivery can be performed, let us look at the newspapers. The +principal daily papers in Boston are served to subscribers by carriers, +at the expense of the publishers. Deducting Sundays and holidays, +there are 310 papers in a year. These are served at the cost +of 25 to 50 cents for each subscriber. Taking the highest cost, and +you pay 1.6 <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">mills</span></span> for each paper delivered—less than +one-sixth of a cent. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The penny papers are served to subscribers by carriers, who have +regular beats or districts; and who furnish their patrons for six cents +per week. These carriers purchase the papers of the publisher, at +62 to 75 cents per 100; so that their profits on each paper are from +one-quarter to three-eighths of a cent. For this they deliver the paper +promptly every morning, and collect the money on Saturday, running, +of course, some risk of losses by bad debts, &c. And yet this business +is found to be so profitable that some routes in New York have +been sold, that is, the good will transferred, for at least $500, just for +the privilege of serving that district. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The two-cent papers from New York are regularly served to customers +in Boston. A person engaged in this business used to buy the +New York Express, Tribune, and Herald, for 1¼ to 1½ cents each. +He paid the cost of bringing them by express from New York. +To guard against failures, he divided his bundles, and had a part sent +by way of Norwich, and a part by Stonington. He then served them +to subscribers all over Boston for 12 cents per week, making his collections +on Saturday. This man made money, so that in a few years +he sold out his route and business in the New York papers, and purchased +an interest in a flourishing penny paper in Boston, of which he +is now one of the publishers. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page060">[pg 060]</span><a name="Pg060" id="Pg060" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +XI. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">The Expense of Cheap Postage, +and how it is to be paid.</span></span> +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It is quite important to have it understood, in all parts of the country, +that the friends of postal reform have no desire to curtail the public +accommodations now enjoyed, in the slightest degree—unless in +cases of manifest abuse. Neither do they consider that too much +money is paid by our government to furnish the people with the privileges +of the mail. We desire rather to see the benefits and conveniences +of the post-office greatly increased, as well as brought more +within the reach of all the population. The bill for establishing cheap +postage should therefore contain a distinct declaration that the mail +facilities of the country shall not be curtailed, but shall be liberally +extended, with the spread and increase of population, so as to give, as +far as the ability of the government will admit, the best practicable +accommodations to every citizen of the republic. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +It ought also to be provided that the Postmaster-General shall have +it in his power, according to his discretion, whenever justice may +require, to continue the compensation of all postmasters equal to their +present rates, in proportion to the amount of services rendered, or +labor performed. It is not easy, at present, to decide how much +the labor of keeping the post-office will be lessened, by the adoption +of uniform rates, and prepayment. Certainly, the reduction +will be very considerable. And experience will hereafter suggest a +new scale of compensations adapted to the new methods of doing the +business. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The falling off in the gross receipts of the British post-office, on +the first adoption of the new system, was upwards of a million sterling, +being nearly 43 per cent. on the whole amount. A corresponding +reduction from the income of our own post-office would amount to +$1,696,734. But the falling off would not be so great. The reduction +of postage in that case was from 7-½<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. +on an average, to 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., while in +ours it would barely prove an average of 6-½ cents to 2 cents. On the +other hand, it is reasonable to expect a very rapid increase of letters, +because the partial reduction in 1845 has already given the people a +taste of the advantages of reduced rates of postage. The whole number +of letters now sent by mail is 52,000,000. The number would, +without doubt, be doubled in one year, which would give a revenue of +above $2,000,000; $2,080,000 from letters. There would also be +a very considerable increase of income from papers and pamphlets, +and a great saving in the article of dead letters and newspapers. It +is safe to estimate the revenue of the post-office, under the new +system, at $3,000,000 for the first year, $3,500,000 for the second, +$4,000,000 for the third, and $4,500,000 for the fourth, which will +bring it up to what will then be the wants of the service, making the +most liberal allowance for improved facilities. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +As an illustration of the capability of retrenchment in expense, let it +be remembered that the present Postmaster-General has effected a +reduction of nearly <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">a million dollars per annum in the cost of transportation +alone</span></em>. He says in his Report: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The direction to the Postmaster-General to contract with the lowest bidder, +without the allowance of any advantage to the former contractor, as had been the +</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page061">[pg 061]</span><a name="Pg061" id="Pg061" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%"> +case before its passage, had the effect of enlarging the field of competition, and +reducing the price of transportation, except on railroads and in steamboats, to the +lowest amount for which the service can be performed; and will reduce the cost of +transportation, when the other section is let to contract under it, but little less than +a million of dollars per annum from the former prices.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In other words, our letter postage is no longer taxed as it used to be, +to give the people of other sections of the country, stage coaches which +they do not support, as well as mails which they do not pay for. There +will doubtless be still further reductions in this branch, in proportion +as the knowledge becomes diffused among the people, of the profits of +this business and the freeness of the competition for it. As Mr. Dana +suggested in his valuable Report in 1844: +</p> + +<div class="block tei tei-quote" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"> +<span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">The difference must arise from want of competition, and a reluctance to engage +in the business of transporting the mail. When the attention of the North shall be +called to the subject, and the difference in price pointed out, we cannot doubt that +contracts will be made nearly as cheap for transportation at the South as at the +North. If southern men will not engage in the business, let it be generally known +that such increased pay can be had, and an abundance of yankee enterprise will be +ready to engage in the business.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span> +</div> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Railroad Transportation</span></span>. One of the most difficult points in +the administration of the post-office, has been the dealing with railroad +corporations. As these are bodies without souls, they can only be +dealt with on the footing of pecuniary interest. And as they are state +institutions, and local favorites, public opinion has been generally predisposed +to take sides with the railroad, and against the department. +And thus the railroads have been able to exact exorbitant allowances +for services which cost them next to nothing. Were the whole mails +of the country to be sent at once by a single railroad, what would be +the amount? The average number of letters mailed in a day is +142,857; which, at the average weight of ⅓ ounce, would weigh 2976 +pounds. The average number of newspapers in a day is 150,685, +which, at the average weight of 2 ounces, would give 18,834 pounds. +The whole together make 21,815 pounds, equal to 109 passengers, +averaging, with their baggage, 200 pounds each. These passengers +would be carried by railroad 200 miles, from Boston to Albany for +$545. The daily cost of railroad service is $1637, which shows that +it is distance, not weight, that is chiefly regarded. Or, in other +words, that the weight of the mails is of very little account to railroads. +It is well known that the corporations regard the carriage of the mail +as almost clear profit. The whole daily mails of the United States +could be carried by the inland route from Boston to New Orleans, by +the established expresses, at their regular rates on parcels, for a little +over $3000; while the whole daily expense of mail transportation is +$6,594. The expresses will carry from Boston to New York, for +$1.50, an amount of parcels, which the post-office would charge $150 +for carrying as letters, or $18.40 as newspapers—and all go by the +same train, of course involving equal cost of transportation to the company. +The inference is unavoidable, that the government is charged +exorbitantly by these companies, from the entire absence of competition +on almost every railroad route. While human nature remains the +same, it is to be expected that corporations will take this advantage +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page062">[pg 062]</span><a name="Pg062" id="Pg062" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> +unless some counteracting interest can be brought to bear upon them +as a restraint against extortion. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Now, let the post-office present itself to the people as a system of +pure and unmingled beneficence, studying not how it can get a little +more money for a little less service, but how it can render the greatest +amount of accommodation with the least expense to the public treasury, +and it will at once become the object of the public gratitude and +warm affection; men will study how to facilitate all its transactions, +will be conscientiously careful not to impose any needless trouble upon +its servants, and will generally watch for its interests as their own. +Such is the benign effect upon all the considerate portions of society in +England. Then the government will be fully sustained in insisting +that all railroads shall carry the mail for a compensation which will be +just a fair equivalent for the service performed, in reasonable proportion +to other services. And if the corporations are perverse in throwing +obstacles in the way, the people will expect that such coercive +measures should be employed, as wisdom may prescribe, to make these +creatures of their power subservient to the public good, and not to +mere private aggrandisement. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In January, 1845, a document was communicated to congress by +the Postmaster-General, containing replies by the British post-office to +certain queries which he had proposed to them. This document gives +the distance travelled daily by mail trains on railways at 1601 miles, +at a cost per mile of 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. +1-18/32<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. per mile. But this <span class="tei tei-q">“distance”</span> is the +number of miles between place and place. The total number of +miles that the mail travels by railroad daily is 5808, which would +make the real cost per mile of travel about 5-¼<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. The number of +miles travelled by railroad in this country is 4,170,403, at the cost of +$597,475, which is about 12 cents per mile. But the English trains +are driven at much greater speed than ours, the expense of running is +much greater in all respects, the cost of the roads is vastly higher, the +weight of mails is much greater, and therefore the price of transportation +might be higher than with us. But it is lower. The average +weight of mails sent daily from London alone is 27,384 pounds, which +is 5569 pounds more than the whole daily mails of the United States. +By act of parliament, the Postmaster-General is authorized and empowered +<span class="tei tei-q">“to require of every railway company that they shall convey +the mail at such times as he may deem proper; and the amount paid +for such services is settled by a subsequent arbitration.”</span> Railroad +service is performed in New Hampshire for a fraction over 4 cents per +mile. The average in New England is 10-½ cents per mile. The average +price of passenger fares, for short distances or long, is but 3 cents per +mile. There can be no doubt that it is within the constitutional and +proper prerogative of congress to take the use of a railroad for the +public service, leaving the just compensation to be awarded by arbitration. +Neither can it be doubted that enlightened arbitration would +greatly reduce the price from what is now paid. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Comparative Cost of other Transportation with Letter +Postage.</span></span> The following table shows the cost of passage from Boston +to the places named, and the cost of transportation of parcels of usual +weight by Express, with the price per half ounce at the same rates. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page063">[pg 063]</span><a name="Pg063" id="Pg063" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The average weight of passengers with their baggage is set at 230 +pounds. This would be equal to the weight of 7360 letters, at half +an ounce each, the postage on which, at two cents, would be $147.20, +irrespective of distance. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">From Boston</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Passenger</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Per half oz.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Express</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Per half oz.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">Fare.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Mills.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Freight.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Mills.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">230 pounds.</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To New York,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">$4.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">$1.50</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To Philadelphia,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">9-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3.50</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To Baltimore,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">10.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1 3-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">5.50</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To Cincinnati,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">25.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3 2-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">10.50</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1 4-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To St. Louis,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">35.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4 7-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">12.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1 6-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To New Orleans,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">45.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6 1-10th</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">14.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1 9-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">To Liverpool,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">120.00</td><td class="tei tei-cell">16 3-10ths</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">7.20</td><td class="tei tei-cell">9-10ths</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">per Cunard Steamers</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Rowland Hill discovered that the cost of transporting a letter from +London to Edinburgh was 1-36th of a penny; and the Parliamentary +Committee ascertained by a different calculation, that this was the +average cost per letter of all the mails in England. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Penny Papers</span></span>. The establishment of penny papers in this country +is a very striking illustration of the principles here involved. It is +now just fifteen years since the New York Sun was commenced by a +couple of journeymen printers, one of whom had just been in my +employ. They were intelligent and enterprising, and began by writing +their editorials and police reports, which they then set up in type, and +worked from an old Ramage press, with their own hands. They +printed seven hundred papers, of a very small size, which they sold to +boys at 62-½ cents per hundred, and the boys sold them in the streets +at one cent each. Soon their editions increased, and they enlarged +their sheet, and hired it printed on a Napier press which I owned. +Again their business increased, so much that it became necessary for +them to have a press of their own, driven by steam power. One of +the partners then sold out his interest for $10,000, went to the West, +studied law, and has been twice a candidate for Congress, with strong +prospects of success. The concern has since passed into other hands, +and has continued to prosper. For many years it has been printed on +a sheet larger than could be bought for a cent, making a constant loss +on the paper alone; besides which, it has cost $25 a week to the +editor for the leading articles alone; and I know not how much for +other editorial labor, market and commercial reports, ship news, foreign +news, lightning expresses, correspondence, &c. And yet the amount +received for advertising has covered all these expenditures, and enabled +the present proprietor to realize, as is supposed, a splendid fortune. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A man in Boston buys 200 copies of the New York Tribune and +other papers daily, for which he pays 1-¼ cents each. The Express +brings him the parcel for 50 cents, which is one quarter of a cent for +each paper. The post-office would charge $3.00 for postage alone. +For the half cent remaining to him after expenses paid, the carrier delivers +his papers to subscribers all over the city, collects his pay once +a month, and runs all the risk of loss of bundles and bad debts. Each +paper weighs about an ounce and a half—equal to three single letters +of full weight, the postage on which would be fifteen cents, making +$30 in all. It is impossible to doubt the practicability of cheap postage. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page064">[pg 064]</span><a name="Pg064" id="Pg064" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +In Scotland, with but 2,628,957 inhabitants, and no great commercial +centre, no political metropolis, and but little foreign commerce, +such is the effect of cheap postage that 28,669,169 letters are sent in +a year. Even in <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">poor</span></em> Ireland, where the people die of hunger by +thousands, where there are millions of people who never taste of bread, +and where the majority of the people are said to be unable to read or +write, with a population of 8,175,124, less than half the population of +the United States—there are 28,587,996 letters mailed under the +influence of penny postage. The population of Scotland and Ireland +together is 10,804,081, not half the present population of the United +States; the number of letters in a year is 57,257,165, being more than +<em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">all</span></em> that are sent in the United States, franks included. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Concluding Remarks</span></span>. I am brought to the close of this essay, +with only a brief space left to be filled, and with many subjects of +remark untouched—the Exclusive Right of the Post-office—the +History of Postage in this country—the Sectional Bearings of Cheap +Postage—the Postage Bill now before Congress—the Moral and Social +Benefits of Cheap Postage. This pamphlet has been wholly +written since the vote of the Publishing Committee, which must be my +apology for some repetitions. The main arguments cannot be overthrown, +until men disprove arithmetic. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Who can doubt that cheap postage would bring three times as +many letters as are now sent by mail in this country. And that would +give a greater revenue to the post-office than it now receives. It is +impossible to doubt the success of cheap postage, when once it is +established. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Now is the favorable time for its adoption. The astonishing success +of cheap postage in Great Britain is opening people's eyes. The +rapid progress which public opinion has made in the last six months in +favor of cheap postage, creates a confident expectation that congress will +yield to the first resolute motion that shall be made, and adopt a well-considered +system, of which two cents letter-postage shall be the +basis, with a general provision for prepayment. The details will be +easily adjusted when the principle is adopted. Let us have no evasions, +no half-way measures, to delude with false hopes, and to stand +as obstacles in the way of the only true system. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Why should I enlarge upon the benefits of cheap postage? The +only question to be asked is—What shall every man do to obtain it? +The answer is, You must understand its merits; you must talk with +your neighbors, and get them interested in its favor; you must write, +if you can, for the papers; you must unite, without delay, in signing +and forwarding the following petition to congress: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, in +Congress assembled</span></span>: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The undersigned, Citizens of: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +respectfully petition Congress to pass a Law to establish <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a uniform +rate of Postage</span></span>, not to exceed <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">one cent on +Newspapers</span></span>, and <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">TWO +CENTS</span></span> on each <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">pre-paid Letter</span></span> +of half an ounce, for all distances; +and for other corresponding reforms. +</p> + +</div> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page065">[pg 065]</span><a name="Pg065" id="Pg065" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> +<a name="toc5" id="toc5"></a> +<a name="pdf6" id="pdf6"></a> +<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">APPENDIX.</span></h1> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +I. TABLES FROM THE PARLIAMENTARY RETURNS. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The parliamentary return, obligingly sent to Dr. Webb by Mr. Hume, +M. P., bears date the 11th of June, 1847, and was made in pursuance of an +order of the House, passed April 22, 1847. The tabular statements contained +in this important paper will be examined with great interest by those +who are accustomed to statistical inquiries, and are here presented for their +use. Taken in connection with Mr. Hume's table, on page 4, they will +present the most convincing evidence of the unparalleled success of cheap +postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +A comparative statement of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Number of Letters</span></span> delivered in +the United Kingdom, in one week of the month of November, 1839, and of each +subsequent year, taking a week in the month of April, 1847. (Condensed from +the parliamentary document.) +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">England and Wales.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Ireland.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Scotland.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">United Kingdom.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1839<a id="noteref_3" name="noteref_3" href="#note_3"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">3</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,252,977</td><td class="tei tei-cell">179,931</td><td class="tei tei-cell">153,065</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,585,973</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,685,181</td><td class="tei tei-cell">385,672</td><td class="tei tei-cell">385,262</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,456,115</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,029,453</td><td class="tei tei-cell">403,421</td><td class="tei tei-cell">413,248</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,846,122</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,282,021</td><td class="tei tei-cell">474,031</td><td class="tei tei-cell">446,494</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,202,546</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,401,595</td><td class="tei tei-cell">478,941</td><td class="tei tei-cell">468,677</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,349,213</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,744,011</td><td class="tei tei-cell">527,630</td><td class="tei tei-cell">511,663</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,783,304</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,467,619</td><td class="tei tei-cell">597,425</td><td class="tei tei-cell">601,715</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">5,666,759</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,629,324</td><td class="tei tei-cell">649,324</td><td class="tei tei-cell">621,850</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">5,890,704</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1847<a id="noteref_4" name="noteref_4" href="#note_4"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">4</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,823,854</td><td class="tei tei-cell">698,313</td><td class="tei tei-cell">626,709</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">6,148,876</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page066">[pg 066]</span><a name="Pg066" id="Pg066" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +II. An account, showing the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Gross</span></span> and +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Net Post Office Revenue</span></span>, and the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Cost +of Management</span></span>, for the United Kingdom, for the year ending the +5th day of January, 1839, and for each subsequent year. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="4"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Year ending</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Gross Revenue.<a id="noteref_5" name="noteref_5" href="#note_5"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">5</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Cost of Management.<a id="noteref_6" name="noteref_6" href="#note_6"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">6</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Net Revenue.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1839</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£2,346,278 —<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 9½<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£686,768 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 6¾<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£1,659,509 17<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 2¾<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1840<a id="noteref_7" name="noteref_7" href="#note_7"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">7</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,390,763 10 1½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">756,999 7 4</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,633,764 2 9½</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,359,466 9 2</td><td class="tei tei-cell">858,677 —5¼</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">500,789 11 4¼</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,499,418 10 11¾</td><td class="tei tei-cell">938,168 19 7½</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">561,249 11 4¼</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,578,145 16 7½</td><td class="tei tei-cell">977,504 10 3</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">600,641 64½</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,620,867 11 10</td><td class="tei tei-cell">980,650 7 5¾</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">640,217 4 4¼</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,705,067 16 4</td><td class="tei tei-cell">985,110 13 10¾</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">719,957 2 5¼</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,901,580 10 2¾</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,125,594 5 —</td><td class="tei tei-cell">775,986 5 2¾</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1847</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,978,293 11 10¼</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,138,745 2 4¼</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">839,548 9 6</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +III. Return of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Payments</span></span> made by the +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Post Office</span></span> during each of the +years ending the 5th of January, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846, +1847, for the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Conveyance</span></span> of the +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Mails</span></span> by <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Railway</span></span> in Great Britain. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="2"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1839,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£12,380 5<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. +7<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1840,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">52,230 1 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1841,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">51,301 6 8</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1842,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">94,818 7 10</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1843,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">77,570 5 7</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1844,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">96,360 10 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1845,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">89,809 4 6</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1846,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">179,257 4 1</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5th January, 1847,</td><td class="tei tei-cell">107,890 14 2</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +IV. An account of the Number and Amount of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Money Orders</span></span> +issued (and paid) in England and Wales (London included), from the 5th April, 1839, to +5th April, 1847, inclusive. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="3"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">For the Quarters ended</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Number.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Amount.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">28,838</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£49,496 5<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">34,612</td><td class="tei tei-cell">59,099 9 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">38,510</td><td class="tei tei-cell">64,056 7 8</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">40,763</td><td class="tei tei-cell">67,411 2 7</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">76,145</td><td class="tei tei-cell">119,932 12 1</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">94,215</td><td class="tei tei-cell">151,734 15 8</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">122,420</td><td class="tei tei-cell">196,507 14 3</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">189,984</td><td class="tei tei-cell">334,652 14 8</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">275,870</td><td class="tei tei-cell">567,518 12 3</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">289,884</td><td class="tei tei-cell">608,774 11 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">334,071</td><td class="tei tei-cell">661,099 9 —</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">390,290</td><td class="tei tei-cell">820,576 11 10</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">419,530</td><td class="tei tei-cell">890,575 17 1</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">422,452</td><td class="tei tei-cell">885,803 4 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">432,205</td><td class="tei tei-cell">901,549 5 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">493,439</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,031,850 5 3</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">512,798</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,080,249 2 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">495,723</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,032,643 5 11</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">515,458</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,060,023 8 7</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">562,030</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,196,428 8 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">582,056</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,212,094 4 9</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">555,561</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,166,161 12 3</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">574,250</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,184,178 — 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">621,826</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,296,451 17 4</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">656,452</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,372,405 18 8</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">613,539</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,279,050 2 4</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">637,369</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,316,164 12 1</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">719,813</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,495,832 17 6</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">716,618</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,490,626 12 5</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 July, 1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">679,236</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,399,789 17 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 October, 1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">706,055</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,447,507 17 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 January, 1847</td><td class="tei tei-cell">779,790</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,588,549 7 2</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">5 April, 1847</td><td class="tei tei-cell">810,603</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,654,278 7 —</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page067">[pg 067]</span><a name="Pg067" id="Pg067" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Commission on Money Orders was, on and from the 20th November, 1840, +reduced as follows: +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +For any sum not exceeding £2, from 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. to +3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>.<br /> +For any sum above £2, and not exceeding £5, from 1s. +6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. to <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">6</span></span>d. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +V. Return of the Number of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Chargeable Letters</span></span>, +which is passed through the London General Post, inwards and outwards, in the +first four weeks of each year, beginning with 1839, distinguishing the Unpaid, +Paid with Coin, Stamped, and Total.<a id="noteref_8" name="noteref_8" href="#note_8"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">8</span></span></a> +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Unpaid.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Paid.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Stamped.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Total.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1839<a id="noteref_9" name="noteref_9" href="#note_9"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">9</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,358,651</td><td class="tei tei-cell">263,496</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,622,147</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840<a id="noteref_10" name="noteref_10" href="#note_10"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">10</span></span></a></td><td class="tei tei-cell">787,139</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,217,127</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,004,266</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">370,080</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,204,419</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,108,074</td><td class="tei tei-cell">4,683,073</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">351,134</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,166,960</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,760,757</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,278,851</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">312,839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,431,231</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,972,828</td><td class="tei tei-cell">5,716,898</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">433,270</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,524,270</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,079,418</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,037,526</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">504,519</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,613,648</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,681,026</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,800,293</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">551,461</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,899,306</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,435,966</td><td class="tei tei-cell">7,886,733</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1847<a id="noteref_11" name="noteref_11" href="#note_11"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">11</span></span></a></td><td class="tei tei-cell">448,838</td><td class="tei tei-cell">3,057,257</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">4,905,674</td><td class="tei tei-cell">8,411,769</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page068">[pg 068]</span><a name="Pg068" id="Pg068" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VI. Return of the Number of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">Chargeable Letters</span></span> which passed +through the London District Post, excluding all General Post Letters, in the first four +weeks of each year, beginning with 1839. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Unpaid.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Paid.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Stamped.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Total.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">800,573</td><td class="tei tei-cell">220,813</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,021,286</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">331,589</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,207,985</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,539,574</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">157,242</td><td class="tei tei-cell">926,264</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">752,134</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,835,640</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">118,101</td><td class="tei tei-cell">820,835</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">980,694</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,919,630</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">113,293</td><td class="tei tei-cell">837,624</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,020,091</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,971,008</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">98,712</td><td class="tei tei-cell">859,776</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,181,314</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,139,802</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">99,005</td><td class="tei tei-cell">947,660</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,337,132</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,383,697</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">119,165</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,055,717</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,573,603</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,748,485</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1847</td><td class="tei tei-cell">108,158</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,079,378</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,685,105</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,872,641</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The Penny Rate took effect on this route Dec. 5, 1839. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The increase of the total, since 1839, is 181 per cent.; showing that the greatest +increase is out of the London District. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VII. Table by Mr. Hill, showing the loss of Revenue by the Post Office, compared +with the Increase of Population. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="6"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Population.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Postage.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Postage due by</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Loss.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Pr. ct.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">Population.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1815</td><td class="tei tei-cell">19,552,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£1,557,291</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£1,557,291</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1820</td><td class="tei tei-cell">20,928,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,479,547</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,677,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£194,553</td><td class="tei tei-cell">11.6</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1825</td><td class="tei tei-cell">22,362,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,670,209</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,789,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">118,781</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6.6</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1830</td><td class="tei tei-cell">23,961,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,517,952</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,917,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">399,048</td><td class="tei tei-cell">20.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1835</td><td class="tei tei-cell">25,605,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,540,300</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,048,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">507,700</td><td class="tei tei-cell">24.8</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +VII. Table by Mr. Hill, showing the loss of Revenue by the Post Office, compared +with the Increase of the Stage-Coach Duty. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="6"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Stage Coach</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Postage.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Post due by</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Loss.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Pr. ct.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">Duty</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell">Coach Duty.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1815</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£217,671</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£1,557,291</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">£1,557,291</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1820</td><td class="tei tei-cell">273,477</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,479,547</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1,946,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£466,453</td><td class="tei tei-cell">24.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1825</td><td class="tei tei-cell">362,631</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,670,209</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,585,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">914,781</td><td class="tei tei-cell">35.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1830</td><td class="tei tei-cell">418,598</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,517,952</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">2,990,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,472,048</td><td class="tei tei-cell">49.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1835</td><td class="tei tei-cell">498,497</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1,540,300</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">3,550,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,009,700</td><td class="tei tei-cell">57.</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +The revenue from the stage coach duty had increased 128 per cent. in twenty +years. There was no reason why the natural demand for the conveyance of letters +should not have increased at least as much as the demand for the conveyance of persons. +It was evident that the postage revenue fell short by at least two millions +which was lost by the high rate of postage. +</p> + +<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page069">[pg 069]</span><a name="Pg069" id="Pg069" class="tei tei-anchor"></a> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +NEWSPAPERS. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +[From Porter's Progress of the British Nation.] +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +Owing to the great craving of the people for information upon political subjects +during the agitation that accompanied the introduction and passing of the bill <span class="tei tei-q">“to +amend the representation of the people,”</span> commonly known as <span class="tei tei-q">“The Reform Bill,”</span> +a great temptation was offered for the illegal publication of newspapers upon unstamped +paper, many of which were sold in large numbers in defiance of all the preventive +efforts made by the officers of government. The stamp duty of fourpence +per sheet was therefore taken off in 1836, leaving a stamp of +1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., as an equivalent +for free postage. +</p> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +IX. Table showing the Number of Newspapers at different periods, and the +Revenue derived from the same. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="3"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Newspapers.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Revenue.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1801</td><td class="tei tei-cell">16,085,085</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£185,806</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1811</td><td class="tei tei-cell">24,421,713</td><td class="tei tei-cell">298,547</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1821</td><td class="tei tei-cell">24,862,186</td><td class="tei tei-cell">335,753</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1826</td><td class="tei tei-cell">27,004,802</td><td class="tei tei-cell">451,676</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1830</td><td class="tei tei-cell">30,158,741</td><td class="tei tei-cell">505,439</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1831</td><td class="tei tei-cell">35,198,160</td><td class="tei tei-cell">483,153</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1835</td><td class="tei tei-cell">33,191,820</td><td class="tei tei-cell">453,130</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1836</td><td class="tei tei-cell">35,576,056</td><td class="tei tei-cell">359,826</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1837</td><td class="tei tei-cell">53,496,207</td><td class="tei tei-cell">218,042</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1838</td><td class="tei tei-cell">53,347,231</td><td class="tei tei-cell">221,164</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1839</td><td class="tei tei-cell">55,891,003</td><td class="tei tei-cell">238,394</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">60,922,151</td><td class="tei tei-cell">244,416</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">59,936,897</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">61,495,503</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td><td class="tei tei-cell"></td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +X. Table showing the Increase of Expense in the British Post Office, consequent +upon the Increase of the Number of Letters under the new System; the Rate +per Letter of the Cost of additional Letters, and the Profits realized from such +Increase, expressed in decimals of a penny. +</p> + +<table summary="This is a table" cellspacing="0" class="tei tei-table" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><colgroup span="5"></colgroup><tbody><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">Years.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Increase of Letters.</td><td class="tei tei-cell">Increase of Cost.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Additional Cost.</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">Additional Profit.</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1840</td><td class="tei tei-cell">93,000,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">£70,231</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. 0.181</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. 0.819</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1841</td><td class="tei tei-cell">27,500,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">101,678</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">0.887</td><td class="tei tei-cell">0.113</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1842</td><td class="tei tei-cell">12,000,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">72,256</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1.445</td><td class="tei tei-cell"><a id="noteref_12" name="noteref_12" href="#note_12"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">12</span></span></a></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1843</td><td class="tei tei-cell">12,000,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">35,826</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">0.716</td><td class="tei tei-cell">0.284</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1844</td><td class="tei tei-cell">21,500,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell"><a id="noteref_13" name="noteref_13" href="#note_13"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">13</span></span></a></td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">—</td><td class="tei tei-cell">1.004</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1845</td><td class="tei tei-cell">29,500,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">6,870</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">0.055</td><td class="tei tei-cell">0.945</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1846</td><td class="tei tei-cell">28,000,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">140,576</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">1.205</td><td class="tei tei-cell"><a id="noteref_14" name="noteref_14" href="#note_14"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">14</span></span></a></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-row"><td class="tei tei-cell">1847</td><td class="tei tei-cell">2,2500,000</td><td class="tei tei-cell">23,879</td> + <td class="tei tei-cell">0.257</td><td class="tei tei-cell">0.746</td></tr></tbody></table> + +<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"> +N. B. The increase of letters since 1839 is 246 millions, and cost of the increase is +.347 of a penny; so that every letter now added to the circulation yields a net profit +to the government of .625<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>., or nearly two thirds of the penny +postage. +</p> + +</div> + +</div> + +<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-back" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 6.00em"> + <div id="footnotes" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + <a name="toc7" id="toc7"></a> + <a name="pdf8" id="pdf8"></a> + <h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Footnotes</span></h1> + <dl class="tei tei-list-footnotes"><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1" name="note_1" href="#noteref_1">1.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><span class="tei tei-q">“The estimate for 1839 is founded on the ascertained +number of letters for one week in the +month of November, and strictly speaking, it is for the +year ending Dec. 5th, at which time 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. +was made the maximum rate. The estimate for each subsequent year +is founded on the ascertained +number of letters for one week in each calendar month.”</span> +</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_2" name="note_2" href="#noteref_2">2.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><span class="tei tei-q">“This is exclusive + of about six and a half millions of franks.”</span></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_3" name="note_3" href="#noteref_3">3.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">The number of franks was ascertained for each of +the weeks ending January 11, January 21, and February 4, 1838; and the mean of these +three gives 126,212 as the estimated number for one week, which is 8 per cent. of +the whole, and leaves 1,459,761 as the number of chargeable letters.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_4" name="note_4" href="#noteref_4">4.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Week ending April 21, 1847. The whole number in the +week ending February was 6,569,696. The number 6,148,876, for one week, multiplied by 52, +gives 319,741,552, the total number for the year 1847.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_5" name="note_5" href="#noteref_5">5.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Namely, the +gross receipts, after deducting the returns for refused letters, &c.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_6" name="note_6" href="#noteref_6">6.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Including all payments out of the +revenue in its progress to the Exchequer, except advances to the Money Order Office; +of these sums £10,307 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s</span></span>. per annum is for pensions, and forms +no part of the disbursements on account of the service of the Post Office.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_7" name="note_7" href="#noteref_7">7.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">This year includes one month of the +Fourpenny Rate.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_8" name="note_8" href="#noteref_8">8.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">By multiplying any of +these numbers by 13, you get the number for 62 weeks, which is, for +all practical purposes, the number for a year; as 20,087,971 in 1839, +to 109,362,997 in 1847</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_9" name="note_9" href="#noteref_9">9.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Estimated from an enumeration for four +several weeks in that year.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_10" name="note_10" href="#noteref_10">10.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">The Penny Rate commenced Jan. 10, 1840; Stamps, +May 6, 1840.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_11" name="note_11" href="#noteref_11">11.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">The increase of the total, since 1839, +is 418 per cent.; of paid in coin, since 1840, 39 per +cent.; of unpaid, since 1841, 21 per cent.; of stamps, since 1841, +183 per cent.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_12" name="note_12" href="#noteref_12">12.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Cost diminished by £364, +equal to <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. 0.004 per letter.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_13" name="note_13" href="#noteref_13">13.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Cost increased +equal to <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. 0.445 per letter.</dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_14" name="note_14" href="#noteref_14">14.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext">Cost increased equal to +<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d</span></span>. 0.205 per letter.</dd></dl> + </div> + <hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em"> + <div id="pgfooter" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em"><pre class="pre tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em">***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHEAP POSTAGE*** +</pre><hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader9" id="rightpageheader9"></a><a name="pgtoc10" id="pgtoc10"></a><a name="pdf11" id="pdf11"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Credits</span></h1><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr><th class="tei tei-label tei-label-gloss">November 7, 2008 </th></tr><tr><td class="tei tei-item"><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item">Project Gutenberg TEI edition 1</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item"><span class="tei tei-respStmt"> + <span class="tei tei-name"> + Produced by Bryan Ness, David King, and the Online + Distributed Proofreading Team at <http://www.pgdp.net/>. + (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain + material from the Google Print project.) + </span> + </span></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></div><hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader12" id="rightpageheader12"></a><a name="pgtoc13" id="pgtoc13"></a><a name="pdf14" id="pdf14"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">A Word from Project Gutenberg</span></h1><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This file should be named + 27196-h.html or + 27196-h.zip.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This and all associated files of various formats will be found + in: + + <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/7/1/9/27196/" class="block tei tei-xref" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span><span style="font-size: 90%">/dirs/2/7/1/9/27196/</span></a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Updated editions will replace the previous one — the old + editions will be renamed.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Creating the works from public domain print editions means that + no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the + Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United + States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. + Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this + license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works + to protect the Project Gutenberg™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered + trademark, and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, + unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge + anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the rules is + very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as + creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. + They may be modified and printed and given away — you may do + practically <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">anything</span></em> with public domain eBooks. + Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially + commercial redistribution.</p></div><hr class="page" /><div id="pglicense" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader15" id="rightpageheader15"></a><a name="pgtoc16" id="pgtoc16"></a><a name="pdf17" id="pdf17"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">The Full Project Gutenberg License</span></h1><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Please read this before you distribute or use this + work.</span></em></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free + distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing + this work (or any other work associated in any way with the + phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span>), you agree to comply with all the terms + of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License (<a href="#pglicense" class="tei tei-ref">available with this file</a> or online + at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/license</a>).</p><div id="pglicense1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 1.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">General Terms of Use & Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ + electronic works</span></h2><div id="pglicense1A" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.A.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic + work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to + and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual + property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree + to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease + using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic + works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a + copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not + agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may + obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the + fee as set forth in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8.</a></p></div><div id="pglicense1B" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.B.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or + associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be + bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you + can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the + full terms of this agreement. See paragraph <a href="#pglicense1C" class="tei tei-ref">1.C</a> below. There are a lot of things you can + do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this + agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic + works. See paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E" class="tei tei-ref">1.E</a> below.</p></div><div id="pglicense1C" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.C.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (<span class="tei tei-q">“the Foundation”</span> or PGLAF), owns a compilation + copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the + individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the + United States. If an individual work is in the public domain in the + United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim + a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, + displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all + references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support + the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by + freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this + agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can + easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in + the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it + without charge with others.</p></div><div id="pglicense1D" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.D.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern + what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in + a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check + the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement + before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or + creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. + The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status + of any work in any country outside the United States.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.E.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:</p><div id="pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.1.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate + access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any + copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> + appears, or with which the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> is associated) is + accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed: + + </p><div class="block tei tei-q" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 0.90em"><span style="font-size: 90%">This eBook is for the use of + anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no + restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it + away or re-use it under the terms of the Project + Gutenberg License included with this eBook or + online at </span><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org" class="tei tei-xref"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span></a></p></div></div><div id="pglicense1E2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.2.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from the public + domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with + permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and + distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or + charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with + the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> associated with or appearing on the work, you + must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for + the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs + <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8</a> or 1.E.9.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.3.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission + of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both + paragraphs <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> through 1.E.7 and any + additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will + be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission + of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.4.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from + this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work + associated with Project Gutenberg™.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.5.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this + electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without + prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> with active links or immediate access + to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E6" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.6.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, + compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including + any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access + to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than + <span class="tei tei-q">“Plain Vanilla ASCII”</span> or other format used in the official + version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ web site (http://www.gutenberg.org), you must, at + no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a + means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon + request, of the work in its original <span class="tei tei-q">“Plain Vanilla ASCII”</span> or + other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License + as specified in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1.</a></p></div><div id="pglicense1E7" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.7.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, + copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with + paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8</a> or 1.E.9.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.8.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to + or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that</p><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label">• </th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to + calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the + Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this + paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days + following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to + prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly + marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in <a href="#pglicense4" class="tei tei-ref">Section 4, <span class="tei tei-q">“Information about donations to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”</span></a></p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does + not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such + a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a + physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other + copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.</p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You provide, in accordance with paragraph <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">1.F.3</a>, a full refund of any money paid for a + work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is + discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the + work.</p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><div id="pglicense1E9" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.9.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or + group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, + you must obtain permission in writing from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael + Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set + forth in <a href="#pglicense3" class="tei tei-ref">Section 3</a> below.</p></div></div><div id="pglicense1F" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.F.</span></h3><div id="pglicense1F1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.1.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, + do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread public domain works + in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ + electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may + contain <span class="tei tei-q">“Defects,”</span> such as, but not limited to, incomplete, + inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other + intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other + medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be + read by your equipment.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.2.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES — Except for the <span class="tei tei-q">“Right of + Replacement or Refund”</span> described in <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">paragraph + 1.F.3</a>, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any + other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, + disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including + legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT + LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE + PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK + OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO + YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL + DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.3.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND — If you discover a defect in + this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a + refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written + explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received + the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your + written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the + defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a + refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity + providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to + receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy + is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further + opportunities to fix the problem.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.4.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in + <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">paragraph 1.F.3</a>, this work is provided + to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR + IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR + FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.5.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or + the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any + disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of + the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be + interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by + the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any + provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F6" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.6.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">INDEMNITY — You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the + trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone + providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this + agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion + and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all + liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly + or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: + (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, + modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any + Defect you cause.</p></div></div></div><div id="pglicense2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 2.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works + in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including + obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the + efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks + of life.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the + assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™'s goals and + ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for + generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a + secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn + more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see + Sections <a href="#pglicense3" class="tei tei-ref">3</a> and <a href="#pglicense4" class="tei tei-ref">4</a> and the Foundation web page at <a href="http://www.pglaf.org" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.pglaf.org</a>.</p></div><div id="pglicense3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 3.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation + organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax + exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or + federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter + is posted at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf</a>. Contributions + to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. + federal laws and your state's laws.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. + S. Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are + scattered throughout numerous locations. Its business office is + located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) + 596-1887, email business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date + contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and + official page at <a href="http://www.pglaf.org" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.pglaf.org</a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For additional contact information: + + </p><div class="block tei tei-address" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">Dr. Gregory B. Newby</span></span><br /><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">Chief Executive and Director</span></span><br /><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">gbnewby@pglaf.org</span></span><br /></div></div><div id="pglicense4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 4.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without wide spread public + support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number + of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in + machine readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment + including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are + particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the + IRS.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating + charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United + States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a + considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up + with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where + we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND + DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state + visit <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we + have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition + against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who + approach us with offers to donate.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make + any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from + outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation methods and + addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including + checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please + visit: <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p></div><div id="pglicense5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 5.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic + works.</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-name">Professor Michael S. Hart</span> is the + originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that + could be freely shared with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and + distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer + support.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of + which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. unless a copyright + notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in + compliance with any particular paper edition.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's + eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, + compressed (zipped), HTML and others.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Corrected <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">editions</span></em> of our eBooks replace the old file + and take over the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file + is renamed. <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Versions</span></em> based on separate sources are treated + as new eBooks receiving new filenames and etext numbers.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search + facility: + + <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org" class="block tei tei-xref" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span></a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to + make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and + how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.</p></div></div></div> + </div> +</div> +</div> +</body></html> |