diff options
Diffstat (limited to '27083.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 27083.txt | 4375 |
1 files changed, 4375 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/27083.txt b/27083.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..817bed8 --- /dev/null +++ b/27083.txt @@ -0,0 +1,4375 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Subjection of Women, by John Stuart Mill + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Subjection of Women + +Author: John Stuart Mill + +Release Date: October 28, 2008 [EBook #27083] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN *** + + + + +Produced by Michael Roe and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images generously made available by The +Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + + + + + + + + + THE + SUBJECTION + OF + WOMEN + + + BY + JOHN STUART MILL + + LONDON + LONGMANS, GREEN, READER, AND DYER + 1869 + + LONDON: + SAVILL, EDWARDS AND CO., PRINTERS, CHANDOS STREET, + COVENT GARDEN. + + + + +CHAPTER I. + + +The object of this Essay is to explain as clearly as I am able, the +grounds of an opinion which I have held from the very earliest period +when I had formed any opinions at all on social or political matters, +and which, instead of being weakened or modified, has been constantly +growing stronger by the progress of reflection and the experience of +life: That the principle which regulates the existing social +relations between the two sexes--the legal subordination of one sex +to the other--is wrong in itself, and now one of the chief hindrances +to human improvement; and that it ought to be replaced by a principle +of perfect equality, admitting no power or privilege on the one side, +nor disability on the other. + +The very words necessary to express the task I have undertaken, show +how arduous it is. But it would be a mistake to suppose that the +difficulty of the case must lie in the insufficiency or obscurity of +the grounds of reason on which my conviction rests. The difficulty is +that which exists in all cases in which there is a mass of feeling to +be contended against. So long as an opinion is strongly rooted in the +feelings, it gains rather than loses in stability by having a +preponderating weight of argument against it. For if it were accepted +as a result of argument, the refutation of the argument might shake +the solidity of the conviction; but when it rests solely on feeling, +the worse it fares in argumentative contest, the more persuaded its +adherents are that their feeling must have some deeper ground, which +the arguments do not reach; and while the feeling remains, it is +always throwing up fresh intrenchments of argument to repair any +breach made in the old. And there are so many causes tending to make +the feelings connected with this subject the most intense and most +deeply-rooted of all those which gather round and protect old +institutions and customs, that we need not wonder to find them as yet +less undermined and loosened than any of the rest by the progress of +the great modern spiritual and social transition; nor suppose that +the barbarisms to which men cling longest must be less barbarisms +than those which they earlier shake off. + +In every respect the burthen is hard on those who attack an almost +universal opinion. They must be very fortunate as well as unusually +capable if they obtain a hearing at all. They have more difficulty in +obtaining a trial, than any other litigants have in getting a +verdict. If they do extort a hearing, they are subjected to a set of +logical requirements totally different from those exacted from other +people. In all other cases, the burthen of proof is supposed to lie +with the affirmative. If a person is charged with a murder, it rests +with those who accuse him to give proof of his guilt, not with +himself to prove his innocence. If there is a difference of opinion +about the reality of any alleged historical event, in which the +feelings of men in general are not much interested, as the Siege of +Troy for example, those who maintain that the event took place are +expected to produce their proofs, before those who take the other +side can be required to say anything; and at no time are these +required to do more than show that the evidence produced by the +others is of no value. Again, in practical matters, the burthen of +proof is supposed to be with those who are against liberty; who +contend for any restriction or prohibition; either any limitation of +the general freedom of human action, or any disqualification or +disparity of privilege affecting one person or kind of persons, as +compared with others. The _a priori_ presumption is in favour of +freedom and impartiality. It is held that there should be no +restraint not required by the general good, and that the law should +be no respecter of persons, but should treat all alike, save where +dissimilarity of treatment is required by positive reasons, either of +justice or of policy. But of none of these rules of evidence will the +benefit be allowed to those who maintain the opinion I profess. It is +useless for me to say that those who maintain the doctrine that men +have a right to command and women are under an obligation to obey, or +that men are fit for government and women unfit, are on the +affirmative side of the question, and that they are bound to show +positive evidence for the assertions, or submit to their rejection. +It is equally unavailing for me to say that those who deny to women +any freedom or privilege rightly allowed to men, having the double +presumption against them that they are opposing freedom and +recommending partiality, must be held to the strictest proof of their +case, and unless their success be such as to exclude all doubt, the +judgment ought to go against them. These would be thought good pleas +in any common case; but they will not be thought so in this instance. +Before I could hope to make any impression, I should be expected not +only to answer all that has ever been said by those who take the +other side of the question, but to imagine all that could be said by +them--to find them in reasons, as well as answer all I find: and +besides refuting all arguments for the affirmative, I shall be called +upon for invincible positive arguments to prove a negative. And even +if I could do all this, and leave the opposite party with a host of +unanswered arguments against them, and not a single unrefuted one on +their side, I should be thought to have done little; for a cause +supported on the one hand by universal usage, and on the other by so +great a preponderance of popular sentiment, is supposed to have a +presumption in its favour, superior to any conviction which an appeal +to reason has power to produce in any intellects but those of a high +class. + +I do not mention these difficulties to complain of them; first, +because it would be useless; they are inseparable from having to +contend through people's understandings against the hostility of +their feelings and practical tendencies: and truly the understandings +of the majority of mankind would need to be much better cultivated +than has ever yet been the case, before they can be asked to place +such reliance in their own power of estimating arguments, as to give +up practical principles in which they have been born and bred and +which are the basis of much of the existing order of the world, at +the first argumentative attack which they are not capable of +logically resisting. I do not therefore quarrel with them for having +too little faith in argument, but for having too much faith in custom +and the general feeling. It is one of the characteristic prejudices +of the reaction of the nineteenth century against the eighteenth, to +accord to the unreasoning elements in human nature the infallibility +which the eighteenth century is supposed to have ascribed to the +reasoning elements. For the apotheosis of Reason we have substituted +that of Instinct; and we call everything instinct which we find in +ourselves and for which we cannot trace any rational foundation. This +idolatry, infinitely more degrading than the other, and the most +pernicious of the false worships of the present day, of all of which +it is now the main support, will probably hold its ground until it +gives way before a sound psychology, laying bare the real root of +much that is bowed down to as the intention of Nature and the +ordinance of God. As regards the present question, I am willing to +accept the unfavourable conditions which the prejudice assigns to me. +I consent that established custom, and the general feeling, should be +deemed conclusive against me, unless that custom and feeling from age +to age can be shown to have owed their existence to other causes than +their soundness, and to have derived their power from the worse +rather than the better parts of human nature. I am willing that +judgment should go against me, unless I can show that my judge has +been tampered with. The concession is not so great as it might +appear; for to prove this, is by far the easiest portion of my task. + +The generality of a practice is in some cases a strong presumption +that it is, or at all events once was, conducive to laudable ends. +This is the case, when the practice was first adopted, or afterwards +kept up, as a means to such ends, and was grounded on experience of +the mode in which they could be most effectually attained. If the +authority of men over women, when first established, had been the +result of a conscientious comparison between different modes of +constituting the government of society; if, after trying various +other modes of social organization--the government of women over men, +equality between the two, and such mixed and divided modes of +government as might be invented--it had been decided, on the +testimony of experience, that the mode in which women are wholly +under the rule of men, having no share at all in public concerns, and +each in private being under the legal obligation of obedience to the +man with whom she has associated her destiny, was the arrangement +most conducive to the happiness and well being of both; its general +adoption might then be fairly thought to be some evidence that, at +the time when it was adopted, if was the best: though even then the +considerations which recommended it may, like so many other primeval +social facts of the greatest importance, have subsequently, in the +course of ages, ceased to exist. But the state of the case is in +every respect the reverse of this. In the first place, the opinion in +favour of the present system, which entirely subordinates the weaker +sex to the stronger, rests upon theory only; for there never has been +trial made of any other: so that experience, in the sense in which it +is vulgarly opposed to theory, cannot be pretended to have pronounced +any verdict. And in the second place, the adoption of this system of +inequality never was the result of deliberation, or forethought, or +any social ideas, or any notion whatever of what conduced to the +benefit of humanity or the good order of society. It arose simply +from the fact that from the very earliest twilight of human society, +every woman (owing to the value attached to her by men, combined with +her inferiority in muscular strength) was found in a state of bondage +to some man. Laws and systems of polity always begin by recognising +the relations they find already existing between individuals. They +convert what was a mere physical fact into a legal right, give it the +sanction of society, and principally aim at the substitution of +public and organized means of asserting and protecting these rights, +instead of the irregular and lawless conflict of physical strength. +Those who had already been compelled to obedience became in this +manner legally bound to it. Slavery, from being a mere affair of +force between the master and the slave, became regularized and a +matter of compact among the masters, who, binding themselves to one +another for common protection, guaranteed by their collective +strength the private possessions of each, including his slaves. In +early times, the great majority of the male sex were slaves, as well +as the whole of the female. And many ages elapsed, some of them ages +of high cultivation, before any thinker was bold enough to question +the rightfulness, and the absolute social necessity, either of the +one slavery or of the other. By degrees such thinkers did arise: and +(the general progress of society assisting) the slavery of the male +sex has, in all the countries of Christian Europe at least (though, +in one of them, only within the last few years) been at length +abolished, and that of the female sex has been gradually changed into +a milder form of dependence. But this dependence, as it exists at +present, is not an original institution, taking a fresh start from +considerations of justice and social expediency--it is the primitive +state of slavery lasting on, through successive mitigations and +modifications occasioned by the same causes which have softened the +general manners, and brought all human relations more under the +control of justice and the influence of humanity. It has not lost the +taint of its brutal origin. No presumption in its favour, therefore, +can be drawn from the fact of its existence. The only such +presumption which it could be supposed to have, must be grounded on +its having lasted till now, when so many other things which came down +from the same odious source have been done away with. And this, +indeed, is what makes it strange to ordinary ears, to hear it +asserted that the inequality of rights between men and women has no +other source than the law of the strongest. + +That this statement should have the effect of a paradox, is in some +respects creditable to the progress of civilization, and the +improvement of the moral sentiments of mankind. We now live--that is +to say, one or two of the most advanced nations of the world now +live--in a state in which the law of the strongest seems to be +entirely abandoned as the regulating principle of the world's +affairs: nobody professes it, and, as regards most of the relations +between human beings, nobody is permitted to practise it. When any +one succeeds in doing so, it is under cover of some pretext which +gives him the semblance of having some general social interest on his +side. This being the ostensible state of things, people flatter +themselves that the rule of mere force is ended; that the law of the +strongest cannot be the reason of existence of anything which has +remained in full operation down to the present time. However any of +our present institutions may have begun, it can only, they think, +have been preserved to this period of advanced civilization by a +well-grounded feeling of its adaptation to human nature, and +conduciveness to the general good. They do not understand the great +vitality and durability of institutions which place right on the side +of might; how intensely they are clung to; how the good as well as +the bad propensities and sentiments of those who have power in their +hands, become identified with retaining it; how slowly these bad +institutions give way, one at a time, the weakest first, beginning +with those which are least interwoven with the daily habits of life; +and how very rarely those who have obtained legal power because they +first had physical, have ever lost their hold of it until the +physical power had passed over to the other side. Such shifting of +the physical force not having taken place in the case of women; this +fact, combined with all the peculiar and characteristic features of +the particular case, made it certain from the first that this branch +of the system of right founded on might, though softened in its most +atrocious features at an earlier period than several of the others, +would be the very last to disappear. It was inevitable that this one +case of a social relation grounded on force, would survive through +generations of institutions grounded on equal justice, an almost +solitary exception to the general character of their laws and +customs; but which, so long as it does not proclaim its own origin, +and as discussion has not brought out its true character, is not felt +to jar with modern civilization, any more than domestic slavery among +the Greeks jarred with their notion of themselves as a free people. + +The truth is, that people of the present and the last two or three +generations have lost all practical sense of the primitive condition +of humanity; and only the few who have studied history accurately, or +have much frequented the parts of the world occupied by the living +representatives of ages long past, are able to form any mental +picture of what society then was. People are not aware how entirely, +in former ages, the law of superior strength was the rule of life; +how publicly and openly it was avowed, I do not say cynically or +shamelessly--for these words imply a feeling that there was something +in it to be ashamed of, and no such notion could find a place in the +faculties of any person in those ages, except a philosopher or a +saint. History gives a cruel experience of human nature, in shewing +how exactly the regard due to the life, possessions, and entire +earthly happiness of any class of persons, was measured by what they +had the power of enforcing; how all who made any resistance to +authorities that had arms in their hands, however dreadful might be +the provocation, had not only the law of force but all other laws, +and all the notions of social obligation against them; and in the +eyes of those whom they resisted, were not only guilty of crime, but +of the worst of all crimes, deserving the most cruel chastisement +which human beings could inflict. The first small vestige of a +feeling of obligation in a superior to acknowledge any right in +inferiors, began when he had been induced, for convenience, to make +some promise to them. Though these promises, even when sanctioned by +the most solemn oaths, were for many ages revoked or violated on the +most trifling provocation or temptation, it is probable that this, +except by persons of still worse than the average morality, was +seldom done without some twinges of conscience. The ancient +republics, being mostly grounded from the first upon some kind of +mutual compact, or at any rate formed by an union of persons not very +unequal in strength, afforded, in consequence, the first instance of +a portion of human relations fenced round, and placed under the +dominion of another law than that of force. And though the original +law of force remained in full operation between them and their +slaves, and also (except so far as limited by express compact) +between a commonwealth and its subjects, or other independent +commonwealths; the banishment of that primitive law even from so +narrow a field, commenced the regeneration of human nature, by giving +birth to sentiments of which experience soon demonstrated the immense +value even for material interests, and which thenceforward only +required to be enlarged, not created. Though slaves were no part of +the commonwealth, it was in the free states that slaves were first +felt to have rights as human beings. The Stoics were, I believe, the +first (except so far as the Jewish law constitutes an exception) who +taught as a part of morality that men were bound by moral obligations +to their slaves. No one, after Christianity became ascendant, could +ever again have been a stranger to this belief, in theory; nor, after +the rise of the Catholic Church, was it ever without persons to stand +up for it. Yet to enforce it was the most arduous task which +Christianity ever had to perform. For more than a thousand years the +Church kept up the contest, with hardly any perceptible success. It +was not for want of power over men's minds. Its power was prodigious. +It could make kings and nobles resign their most valued possessions +to enrich the Church. It could make thousands, in the prime of life +and the height of worldly advantages, shut themselves up in convents +to work out their salvation by poverty, fasting, and prayer. It could +send hundreds of thousands across land and sea, Europe and Asia, to +give their lives for the deliverance of the Holy Sepulchre. It could +make kings relinquish wives who were the object of their passionate +attachment, because the Church declared that they were within the +seventh (by our calculation the fourteenth) degree of relationship. +All this it did; but it could not make men fight less with one +another, nor tyrannize less cruelly over the serfs, and when they +were able, over burgesses. It could not make them renounce either of +the applications of force; force militant, or force triumphant. This +they could never be induced to do until they were themselves in their +turn compelled by superior force. Only by the growing power of kings +was an end put to fighting except between kings, or competitors for +kingship; only by the growth of a wealthy and warlike bourgeoisie in +the fortified towns, and of a plebeian infantry which proved more +powerful in the field than the undisciplined chivalry, was the +insolent tyranny of the nobles over the bourgeoisie and peasantry +brought within some bounds. It was persisted in not only until, but +long after, the oppressed had obtained a power enabling them often to +take conspicuous vengeance; and on the Continent much of it continued +to the time of the French Revolution, though in England the earlier +and better organization of the democratic classes put an end to it +sooner, by establishing equal laws and free national institutions. + +If people are mostly so little aware how completely, during the +greater part of the duration of our species, the law of force was the +avowed rule of general conduct, any other being only a special and +exceptional consequence of peculiar ties--and from how very recent a +date it is that the affairs of society in general have been even +pretended to be regulated according to any moral law; as little do +people remember or consider, how institutions and customs which never +had any ground but the law of force, last on into ages and states of +general opinion which never would have permitted their first +establishment. Less than forty years ago, Englishmen might still by +law hold human beings in bondage as saleable property: within the +present century they might kidnap them and carry them off, and work +them literally to death. This absolutely extreme case of the law of +force, condemned by those who can tolerate almost every other form of +arbitrary power, and which, of all others, presents features the most +revolting to the feelings of all who look at it from an impartial +position, was the law of civilized and Christian England within the +memory of persons now living: and in one half of Anglo-Saxon America +three or four years ago, not only did slavery exist, but the slave +trade, and the breeding of slaves expressly for it, was a general +practice between slave states. Yet not only was there a greater +strength of sentiment against it, but, in England at least, a less +amount either of feeling or of interest in favour of it, than of any +other of the customary abuses of force: for its motive was the love +of gain, unmixed and undisguised; and those who profited by it were a +very small numerical fraction of the country, while the natural +feeling of all who were not personally interested in it, was +unmitigated abhorrence. So extreme an instance makes it almost +superfluous to refer to any other: but consider the long duration of +absolute monarchy. In England at present it is the almost universal +conviction that military despotism is a case of the law of force, +having no other origin or justification. Yet in all the great nations +of Europe except England it either still exists, or has only just +ceased to exist, and has even now a strong party favourable to it in +all ranks of the people, especially among persons of station and +consequence. Such is the power of an established system, even when +far from universal; when not only in almost every period of history +there have been great and well-known examples of the contrary system, +but these have almost invariably been afforded by the most +illustrious and most prosperous communities. In this case, too, the +possessor of the undue power, the person directly interested in it, +is only one person, while those who are subject to it and suffer from +it are literally all the rest. The yoke is naturally and necessarily +humiliating to all persons, except the one who is on the throne, +together with, at most, the one who expects to succeed to it. How +different are these cases from that of the power of men over women! I +am not now prejudging the question of its justifiableness. I am +showing how vastly more permanent it could not but be, even if not +justifiable, than these other dominations which have nevertheless +lasted down to our own time. Whatever gratification of pride there is +in the possession of power, and whatever personal interest in its +exercise, is in this case not confined to a limited class, but common +to the whole male sex. Instead of being, to most of its supporters, a +thing desirable chiefly in the abstract, or, like the political ends +usually contended for by factious, of little private importance to +any but the leaders; it comes home to the person and hearth of every +male head of a family, and of every one who looks forward to being +so. The clodhopper exercises, or is to exercise, his share of the +power equally with the highest nobleman. And the case is that in +which the desire of power is the strongest: for every one who desires +power, desires it most over those who are nearest to him, with whom +his life is passed, with whom he has most concerns in common, and in +whom any independence of his authority is oftenest likely to +interfere with his individual preferences. If, in the other cases +specified, powers manifestly grounded only on force, and having so +much less to support them, are so slowly and with so much difficulty +got rid of, much more must it be so with this, even if it rests on no +better foundation than those. We must consider, too, that the +possessors of the power have facilities in this case, greater than in +any other, to prevent any uprising against it. Every one of the +subjects lives under the very eye, and almost, it may be said, in the +hands, of one of the masters--in closer intimacy with him than with +any of her fellow-subjects; with no means of combining against him, +no power of even locally over-mastering him, and, on the other hand, +with the strongest motives for seeking his favour and avoiding to +give him offence. In struggles for political emancipation, everybody +knows how often its champions are bought off by bribes, or daunted by +terrors. In the case of women, each individual of the subject-class +is in a chronic state of bribery and intimidation combined. In +setting up the standard of resistance, a large number of the leaders, +and still more of the followers, must make an almost complete +sacrifice of the pleasures or the alleviations of their own +individual lot. If ever any system of privilege and enforced +subjection had its yoke tightly riveted on the necks of those who are +kept down by it, this has. I have not yet shown that it is a wrong +system: but every one who is capable of thinking on the subject must +see that even if it is, it was certain to outlast all other forms of +unjust authority. And when some of the grossest of the other forms +still exist in many civilized countries, and have only recently been +got rid of in others, it would be strange if that which is so much +the deepest-rooted had yet been perceptibly shaken anywhere. There is +more reason to wonder that the protests and testimonies against it +should have been so numerous and so weighty as they are. + +Some will object, that a comparison cannot fairly be made between the +government of the male sex and the forms of unjust power which I have +adduced in illustration of it, since these are arbitrary, and the +effect of mere usurpation, while it on the contrary is natural. But +was there ever any domination which did not appear natural to those +who possessed it? There was a time when the division of mankind into +two classes, a small one of masters and a numerous one of slaves, +appeared, even to the most cultivated minds, to be a natural, and the +only natural, condition of the human race. No less an intellect, and +one which contributed no less to the progress of human thought, than +Aristotle, held this opinion without doubt or misgiving; and rested +it on the same premises on which the same assertion in regard to the +dominion of men over women is usually based, namely that there are +different natures among mankind, free natures, and slave natures; +that the Greeks were of a free nature, the barbarian races of +Thracians and Asiatics of a slave nature. But why need I go back to +Aristotle? Did not the slaveowners of the Southern United States +maintain the same doctrine, with all the fanaticism with which men +cling to the theories that justify their passions and legitimate +their personal interests? Did they not call heaven and earth to +witness that the dominion of the white man over the black is natural, +that the black race is by nature incapable of freedom, and marked out +for slavery? some even going so far as to say that the freedom of +manual labourers is an unnatural order of things anywhere. Again, the +theorists of absolute monarchy have always affirmed it to be the only +natural form of government; issuing from the patriarchal, which was +the primitive and spontaneous form of society, framed on the model of +the paternal, which is anterior to society itself, and, as they +contend, the most natural authority of all. Nay, for that matter, the +law of force itself, to those who could not plead any other, has +always seemed the most natural of all grounds for the exercise of +authority. Conquering races hold it to be Nature's own dictate that +the conquered should obey the conquerors, or, as they euphoniously +paraphrase it, that the feebler and more unwarlike races should +submit to the braver and manlier. The smallest acquaintance with +human life in the middle ages, shows how supremely natural the +dominion of the feudal nobility over men of low condition appeared to +the nobility themselves, and how unnatural the conception seemed, of +a person of the inferior class claiming equality with them, or +exercising authority over them. It hardly seemed less so to the class +held in subjection. The emancipated serfs and burgesses, even in +their most vigorous struggles, never made any pretension to a share +of authority; they only demanded more or less of limitation to the +power of tyrannizing over them. So true is it that unnatural +generally means only uncustomary, and that everything which is usual +appears natural. The subjection of women to men being a universal +custom, any departure from it quite naturally appears unnatural. But +how entirely, even in this case, the feeling is dependent on custom, +appears by ample experience. Nothing so much astonishes the people of +distant parts of the world, when they first learn anything about +England, as to be told that it is under a queen: the thing seems to +them so unnatural as to be almost incredible. To Englishmen this does +not seem in the least degree unnatural, because they are used to it; +but they do feel it unnatural that women should be soldiers or +members of parliament. In the feudal ages, on the contrary, war and +politics were not thought unnatural to women, because not unusual; it +seemed natural that women of the privileged classes should be of +manly character, inferior in nothing but bodily strength to their +husbands and fathers. The independence of women seemed rather less +unnatural to the Greeks than to other ancients, on account of the +fabulous Amazons (whom they believed to be historical), and the +partial example afforded by the Spartan women; who, though no less +subordinate by law than in other Greek states, were more free in +fact, and being trained to bodily exercises in the same manner with +men, gave ample proof that they were not naturally disqualified for +them. There can be little doubt that Spartan experience suggested to +Plato, among many other of his doctrines, that of the social and +political equality of the two sexes. + +But, it will be said, the rule of men over women differs from all +these others in not being a rule of force: it is accepted +voluntarily; women make no complaint, and are consenting parties to +it. In the first place, a great number of women do not accept it. +Ever since there have been women able to make their sentiments known +by their writings (the only mode of publicity which society permits +to them), an increasing number of them have recorded protests against +their present social condition: and recently many thousands of them, +headed by the most eminent women known to the public, have petitioned +Parliament for their admission to the Parliamentary Suffrage. The +claim of women to be educated as solidly, and in the same branches of +knowledge, as men, is urged with growing intensity, and with a great +prospect of success; while the demand for their admission into +professions and occupations hitherto closed against them, becomes +every year more urgent. Though there are not in this country, as +there are in the United States, periodical Conventions and an +organized party to agitate for the Rights of Women, there is a +numerous and active Society organized and managed by women, for the +more limited object of obtaining the political franchise. Nor is it +only in our own country and in America that women are beginning to +protest, more or less collectively, against the disabilities under +which they labour. France, and Italy, and Switzerland, and Russia now +afford examples of the same thing. How many more women there are who +silently cherish similar aspirations, no one can possibly know; but +there are abundant tokens how many _would_ cherish them, were they +not so strenuously taught to repress them as contrary to the +proprieties of their sex. It must be remembered, also, that no +enslaved class ever asked for complete liberty at once. When Simon de +Montfort called the deputies of the commons to sit for the first time +in Parliament, did any of them dream of demanding that an assembly, +elected by their constituents, should make and destroy ministries, +and dictate to the king in affairs of state? No such thought entered +into the imagination of the most ambitious of them. The nobility had +already these pretensions; the commons pretended to nothing but to be +exempt from arbitrary taxation, and from the gross individual +oppression of the king's officers. It is a political law of nature +that those who are under any power of ancient origin, never begin by +complaining of the power itself, but only of its oppressive exercise. +There is never any want of women who complain of ill usage by their +husbands. There would be infinitely more, if complaint were not the +greatest of all provocatives to a repetition and increase of the ill +usage. It is this which frustrates all attempts to maintain the power +but protect the woman against its abuses. In no other case (except +that of a child) is the person who has been proved judicially to have +suffered an injury, replaced under the physical power of the culprit +who inflicted it. Accordingly wives, even in the most extreme and +protracted cases of bodily ill usage, hardly ever dare avail +themselves of the laws made for their protection: and if, in a moment +of irrepressible indignation, or by the interference of neighbours, +they are induced to do so, their whole effort afterwards is to +disclose as little as they can, and to beg off their tyrant from his +merited chastisement. + +All causes, social and natural, combine to make it unlikely that +women should be collectively rebellious to the power of men. They are +so far in a position different from all other subject classes, that +their masters require something more from them than actual service. +Men do not want solely the obedience of women, they want their +sentiments. All men, except the most brutish, desire to have, in the +woman most nearly connected with them, not a forced slave but a +willing one, not a slave merely, but a favourite. They have therefore +put everything in practice to enslave their minds. The masters of all +other slaves rely, for maintaining obedience, on fear; either fear of +themselves, or religious fears. The masters of women wanted more than +simple obedience, and they turned the whole force of education to +effect their purpose. All women are brought up from the very earliest +years in the belief that their ideal of character is the very +opposite to that of men; not self-will, and government by +self-control, but submission, and yielding to the control of others. +All the moralities tell them that it is the duty of women, and all +the current sentimentalities that it is their nature, to live for +others; to make complete abnegation of themselves, and to have no +life but in their affections. And by their affections are meant the +only ones they are allowed to have--those to the men with whom they +are connected, or to the children who constitute an additional and +indefeasible tie between them and a man. When we put together three +things--first, the natural attraction between opposite sexes; +secondly, the wife's entire dependence on the husband, every +privilege or pleasure she has being either his gift, or depending +entirely on his will; and lastly, that the principal object of human +pursuit, consideration, and all objects of social ambition, can in +general be sought or obtained by her only through him, it would be a +miracle if the object of being attractive to men had not become the +polar star of feminine education and formation of character. And, +this great means of influence over the minds of women having been +acquired, an instinct of selfishness made men avail themselves of it +to the utmost as a means of holding women in subjection, by +representing to them meekness, submissiveness, and resignation of all +individual will into the hands of a man, as an essential part of +sexual attractiveness. Can it be doubted that any of the other yokes +which mankind have succeeded in breaking, would have subsisted till +now if the same means had existed, and had been as sedulously used, +to bow down their minds to it? If it had been made the object of the +life of every young plebeian to find personal favour in the eyes of +some patrician, of every young serf with some seigneur; if +domestication with him, and a share of his personal affections, had +been held out as the prize which they all should look out for, the +most gifted and aspiring being able to reckon on the most desirable +prizes; and if, when this prize had been obtained, they had been shut +out by a wall of brass from all interests not centering in him, all +feelings and desires but those which he shared or inculcated; would +not serfs and seigneurs, plebeians and patricians, have been as +broadly distinguished at this day as men and women are? and would not +all but a thinker here and there, have believed the distinction to be +a fundamental and unalterable fact in human nature? + +The preceding considerations are amply sufficient to show that +custom, however universal it may be, affords in this case no +presumption, and ought not to create any prejudice, in favour of the +arrangements which place women in social and political subjection to +men. But I may go farther, and maintain that the course of history, +and the tendencies of progressive human society, afford not only no +presumption in favour of this system of inequality of rights, but a +strong one against it; and that, so far as the whole course of human +improvement up to this time, the whole stream of modern tendencies, +warrants any inference on the subject, it is, that this relic of the +past is discordant with the future, and must necessarily disappear. + +For, what is the peculiar character of the modern world--the +difference which chiefly distinguishes modern institutions, modern +social ideas, modern life itself, from those of times long past? It +is, that human beings are no longer born to their place in life, and +chained down by an inexorable bond to the place they are born to, but +are free to employ their faculties, and such favourable chances as +offer, to achieve the lot which may appear to them most desirable. +Human society of old was constituted on a very different principle. +All were born to a fixed social position, and were mostly kept in it +by law, or interdicted from any means by which they could emerge from +it. As some men are born white and others black, so some were born +slaves and others freemen and citizens; some were born patricians, +others plebeians; some were born feudal nobles, others commoners and +_roturiers_. A slave or serf could never make himself free, nor, +except by the will of his master, become so. In most European +countries it was not till towards the close of the middle ages, and +as a consequence of the growth of regal power, that commoners could +be ennobled. Even among nobles, the eldest son was born the exclusive +heir to the paternal possessions, and a long time elapsed before it +was fully established that the father could disinherit him. Among the +industrious classes, only those who were born members of a guild, or +were admitted into it by its members, could lawfully practise their +calling within its local limits; and nobody could practise any +calling deemed important, in any but the legal manner--by processes +authoritatively prescribed. Manufacturers have stood in the pillory +for presuming to carry on their business by new and improved methods. +In modern Europe, and most in those parts of it which have +participated most largely in all other modern improvements, +diametrically opposite doctrines now prevail. Law and government do +not undertake to prescribe by whom any social or industrial operation +shall or shall not be conducted, or what modes of conducting them +shall be lawful. These things are left to the unfettered choice of +individuals. Even the laws which required that workmen should serve +an apprenticeship, have in this country been repealed: there being +ample assurance that in all cases in which an apprenticeship is +necessary, its necessity will suffice to enforce it. The old theory +was, that the least possible should be left to the choice of the +individual agent; that all he had to do should, as far as +practicable, be laid down for him by superior wisdom. Left to himself +he was sure to go wrong. The modern conviction, the fruit of a +thousand years of experience, is, that things in which the individual +is the person directly interested, never go right but as they are +left to his own discretion; and that any regulation of them by +authority, except to protect the rights of others, is sure to be +mischievous. This conclusion, slowly arrived at, and not adopted +until almost every possible application of the contrary theory had +been made with disastrous result, now (in the industrial department) +prevails universally in the most advanced countries, almost +universally in all that have pretensions to any sort of advancement. +It is not that all processes are supposed to be equally good, or all +persons to be equally qualified for everything; but that freedom of +individual choice is now known to be the only thing which procures +the adoption of the best processes, and throws each operation into +the hands of those who are best qualified for it. Nobody thinks it +necessary to make a law that only a strong-armed man shall be a +blacksmith. Freedom and competition suffice to make blacksmiths +strong-armed men, because the weak-armed can earn more by engaging in +occupations for which they are more fit. In consonance with this +doctrine, it is felt to be an overstepping of the proper bounds of +authority to fix beforehand, on some general presumption, that +certain persons are not fit to do certain things. It is now +thoroughly known and admitted that if some such presumptions exist, +no such presumption is infallible. Even if it be well grounded in a +majority of cases, which it is very likely not to be, there will be a +minority of exceptional cases in which it does not hold: and in those +it is both an injustice to the individuals, and a detriment to +society, to place barriers in the way of their using their faculties +for their own benefit and for that of others. In the cases, on the +other hand, in which the unfitness is real, the ordinary motives of +human conduct will on the whole suffice to prevent the incompetent +person from making, or from persisting in, the attempt. + +If this general principle of social and economical science is not +true; if individuals, with such help as they can derive from the +opinion of those who know them, are not better judges than the law +and the government, of their own capacities and vocation; the world +cannot too soon abandon this principle, and return to the old system +of regulations and disabilities. But if the principle is true, we +ought to act as if we believed it, and not to ordain that to be born +a girl instead of a boy, any more than to be born black instead of +white, or a commoner instead of a nobleman, shall decide the person's +position through all life--shall interdict people from all the more +elevated social positions, and from all, except a few, respectable +occupations. Even were we to admit the utmost that is ever pretended +as to the superior fitness of men for all the functions now reserved +to them, the same argument applies which forbids a legal +qualification for members of Parliament. If only once in a dozen +years the conditions of eligibility exclude a fit person, there is a +real loss, while the exclusion of thousands of unfit persons is no +gain; for if the constitution of the electoral body disposes them to +choose unfit persons, there are always plenty of such persons to +choose from. In all things of any difficulty and importance, those +who can do them well are fewer than the need, even with the most +unrestricted latitude of choice: and any limitation of the field of +selection deprives society of some chances of being served by the +competent, without ever saving it from the incompetent. + +At present, in the more improved countries, the disabilities of women +are the only case, save one, in which laws and institutions take +persons at their birth, and ordain that they shall never in all their +lives be allowed to compete for certain things. The one exception is +that of royalty. Persons still are born to the throne; no one, not of +the reigning family, can ever occupy it, and no one even of that +family can, by any means but the course of hereditary succession, +attain it. All other dignities and social advantages are open to the +whole male sex: many indeed are only attainable by wealth, but wealth +may be striven for by any one, and is actually obtained by many men +of the very humblest origin. The difficulties, to the majority, are +indeed insuperable without the aid of fortunate accidents; but no +male human being is under any legal ban: neither law nor opinion +superadd artificial obstacles to the natural ones. Royalty, as I have +said, is excepted: but in this case every one feels it to be an +exception--an anomaly in the modern world, in marked opposition to +its customs and principles, and to be justified only by extraordinary +special expediencies, which, though individuals and nations differ in +estimating their weight, unquestionably do in fact exist. But in this +exceptional case, in which a high social function is, for important +reasons, bestowed on birth instead of being put up to competition, +all free nations contrive to adhere in substance to the principle +from which they nominally derogate; for they circumscribe this high +function by conditions avowedly intended to prevent the person to +whom it ostensibly belongs from really performing it; while the +person by whom it is performed, the responsible minister, does obtain +the post by a competition from which no full-grown citizen of the +male sex is legally excluded. The disabilities, therefore, to which +women are subject from the mere fact of their birth, are the solitary +examples of the kind in modern legislation. In no instance except +this, which comprehends half the human race, are the higher social +functions closed against any one by a fatality of birth which no +exertions, and no change of circumstances, can overcome; for even +religious disabilities (besides that in England and in Europe they +have practically almost ceased to exist) do not close any career to +the disqualified person in case of conversion. + +The social subordination of women thus stands out an isolated fact in +modern social institutions; a solitary breach of what has become +their fundamental law; a single relic of an old world of thought and +practice exploded in everything else, but retained in the one thing +of most universal interest; as if a gigantic dolmen, or a vast temple +of Jupiter Olympius, occupied the site of St. Paul's and received +daily worship, while the surrounding Christian churches were only +resorted to on fasts and festivals. This entire discrepancy between +one social fact and all those which accompany it, and the radical +opposition between its nature and the progressive movement which is +the boast of the modern world, and which has successively swept away +everything else of an analogous character, surely affords, to a +conscientious observer of human tendencies, serious matter for +reflection. It raises a prima facie presumption on the unfavourable +side, far outweighing any which custom and usage could in such +circumstances create on the favourable; and should at least suffice +to make this, like the choice between republicanism and royalty, a +balanced question. + +The least that can be demanded is, that the question should not be +considered as prejudged by existing fact and existing opinion, but +open to discussion on its merits, as a question of justice and +expediency: the decision on this, as on any of the other social +arrangements of mankind, depending on what an enlightened estimate of +tendencies and consequences may show to be most advantageous to +humanity in general, without distinction of sex. And the discussion +must be a real discussion, descending to foundations, and not resting +satisfied with vague and general assertions. It will not do, for +instance, to assert in general terms, that the experience of mankind +has pronounced in favour of the existing system. Experience cannot +possibly have decided between two courses, so long as there has only +been experience of one. If it be said that the doctrine of the +equality of the sexes rests only on theory, it must be remembered +that the contrary doctrine also has only theory to rest upon. All +that is proved in its favour by direct experience, is that mankind +have been able to exist under it, and to attain the degree of +improvement and prosperity which we now see; but whether that +prosperity has been attained sooner, or is now greater, than it would +have been under the other system, experience does not say. On the +other hand, experience does say, that every step in improvement has +been so invariably accompanied by a step made in raising the social +position of women, that historians and philosophers have been led to +adopt their elevation or debasement as on the whole the surest test +and most correct measure of the civilization of a people or an age. +Through all the progressive period of human history, the condition of +women has been approaching nearer to equality with men. This does not +of itself prove that the assimilation must go on to complete +equality; but it assuredly affords some presumption that such is the +case. + +Neither does it avail anything to say that the _nature_ of the two +sexes adapts them to their present functions and position, and +renders these appropriate to them. Standing on the ground of common +sense and the constitution of the human mind, I deny that any one +knows, or can know, the nature of the two sexes, as long as they have +only been seen in their present relation to one another. If men had +ever been found in society without women, or women without men, or if +there had been a society of men and women in which the women were not +under the control of the men, something might have been positively +known about the mental and moral differences which may be inherent in +the nature of each. What is now called the nature of women is an +eminently artificial thing--the result of forced repression in some +directions, unnatural stimulation in others. It may be asserted +without scruple, that no other class of dependents have had their +character so entirely distorted from its natural proportions by their +relation with their masters; for, if conquered and slave races have +been, in some respects, more forcibly repressed, whatever in them has +not been crushed down by an iron heel has generally been let alone, +and if left with any liberty of development, it has developed itself +according to its own laws; but in the case of women, a hot-house and +stove cultivation has always been carried on of some of the +capabilities of their nature, for the benefit and pleasure of their +masters. Then, because certain products of the general vital force +sprout luxuriantly and reach a great development in this heated +atmosphere and under this active nurture and watering, while other +shoots from the same root, which are left outside in the wintry air, +with ice purposely heaped all round them, have a stunted growth, and +some are burnt off with fire and disappear; men, with that inability +to recognise their own work which distinguishes the unanalytic mind, +indolently believe that the tree grows of itself in the way they have +made it grow, and that it would die if one half of it were not kept +in a vapour bath and the other half in the snow. + +Of all difficulties which impede the progress of thought, and the +formation of well-grounded opinions on life and social arrangements, +the greatest is now the unspeakable ignorance and inattention of +mankind in respect to the influences which form human character. +Whatever any portion of the human species now are, or seem to be, +such, it is supposed, they have a natural tendency to be: even when +the most elementary knowledge of the circumstances in which they have +been placed, clearly points out the causes that made them what they +are. Because a cottier deeply in arrears to his landlord is not +industrious, there are people who think that the Irish are naturally +idle. Because constitutions can be overthrown when the authorities +appointed to execute them turn their arms against them, there are +people who think the French incapable of free government. Because the +Greeks cheated the Turks, and the Turks only plundered the Greeks, +there are persons who think that the Turks are naturally more +sincere: and because women, as is often said, care nothing about +politics except their personalities, it is supposed that the general +good is naturally less interesting to women than to men. History, +which is now so much better understood than formerly, teaches another +lesson: if only by showing the extraordinary susceptibility of human +nature to external influences, and the extreme variableness of those +of its manifestations which are supposed to be most universal and +uniform. But in history, as in travelling, men usually see only what +they already had in their own minds; and few learn much from history, +who do not bring much with them to its study. + +Hence, in regard to that most difficult question, what are the +natural differences between the two sexes--a subject on which it is +impossible in the present state of society to obtain complete and +correct knowledge--while almost everybody dogmatizes upon it, almost +all neglect and make light of the only means by which any partial +insight can be obtained into it. This is, an analytic study of the +most important department of psychology, the laws of the influence of +circumstances on character. For, however great and apparently +ineradicable the moral and intellectual differences between men and +women might be, the evidence of their being natural differences could +only be negative. Those only could be inferred to be natural which +could not possibly be artificial--the residuum, after deducting every +characteristic of either sex which can admit of being explained from +education or external circumstances. The profoundest knowledge of the +laws of the formation of character is indispensable to entitle any +one to affirm even that there is any difference, much more what the +difference is, between the two sexes considered as moral and rational +beings; and since no one, as yet, has that knowledge, (for there is +hardly any subject which, in proportion to its importance, has been +so little studied), no one is thus far entitled to any positive +opinion on the subject. Conjectures are all that can at present be +made; conjectures more or less probable, according as more or less +authorized by such knowledge as we yet have of the laws of +psychology, as applied to the formation of character. + +Even the preliminary knowledge, what the differences between the +sexes now are, apart from all question as to how they are made what +they are, is still in the crudest and most incomplete state. Medical +practitioners and physiologists have ascertained, to some extent, the +differences in bodily constitution; and this is an important element +to the psychologist: but hardly any medical practitioner is a +psychologist. Respecting the mental characteristics of women; their +observations are of no more worth than those of common men. It is a +subject on which nothing final can be known, so long as those who +alone can really know it, women themselves, have given but little +testimony, and that little, mostly suborned. It is easy to know +stupid women. Stupidity is much the same all the world over. A stupid +person's notions and feelings may confidently be inferred from those +which prevail in the circle by which the person is surrounded. Not so +with those whose opinions and feelings are an emanation from their +own nature and faculties. It is only a man here and there who has any +tolerable knowledge of the character even of the women of his own +family. I do not mean, of their capabilities; these nobody knows, not +even themselves, because most of them have never been called out. I +mean their actually existing thoughts and feelings. Many a man thinks +he perfectly understands women, because he has had amatory relations +with several, perhaps with many of them. If he is a good observer, +and his experience extends to quality as well as quantity, he may +have learnt something of one narrow department of their nature--an +important department, no doubt. But of all the rest of it, few +persons are generally more ignorant, because there are few from whom +it is so carefully hidden. The most favourable case which a man can +generally have for studying the character of a woman, is that of his +own wife: for the opportunities are greater, and the cases of +complete sympathy not so unspeakably rare. And in fact, this is the +source from which any knowledge worth having on the subject has, I +believe, generally come. But most men have not had the opportunity of +studying in this way more than a single case: accordingly one can, to +an almost laughable degree, infer what a man's wife is like, from his +opinions about women in general. To make even this one case yield any +result, the woman must be worth knowing, and the man not only a +competent judge, but of a character so sympathetic in itself, and so +well adapted to hers, that he can either read her mind by sympathetic +intuition, or has nothing in himself which makes her shy of +disclosing it. Hardly anything, I believe, can be more rare than this +conjunction. It often happens that there is the most complete unity +of feeling and community of interests as to all external things, yet +the one has as little admission into the internal life of the other +as if they were common acquaintance. Even with true affection, +authority on the one side and subordination on the other prevent +perfect confidence. Though nothing may be intentionally withheld, +much is not shown. In the analogous relation of parent and child, the +corresponding phenomenon must have been in the observation of every +one. As between father and son, how many are the cases in which the +father, in spite of real affection on both sides, obviously to all +the world does not know, nor suspect, parts of the son's character +familiar to his companions and equals. The truth is, that the +position of looking up to another is extremely unpropitious to +complete sincerity and openness with him. The fear of losing ground +in his opinion or in his feelings is so strong, that even in an +upright character, there is an unconscious tendency to show only the +best side, or the side which, though not the best, is that which he +most likes to see: and it may be confidently said that thorough +knowledge of one another hardly ever exists, but between persons who, +besides being intimates, are equals. How much more true, then, must +all this be, when the one is not only under the authority of the +other, but has it inculcated on her as a duty to reckon everything +else subordinate to his comfort and pleasure, and to let him neither +see nor feel anything coming from her, except what is agreeable to +him. All these difficulties stand in the way of a man's obtaining any +thorough knowledge even of the one woman whom alone, in general, he +has sufficient opportunity of studying. When we further consider that +to understand one woman is not necessarily to understand any other +woman; that even if he could study many women of one rank, or of one +country, he would not thereby understand women of other ranks or +countries; and even if he did, they are still only the women of a +single period of history; we may safely assert that the knowledge +which men can acquire of women, even as they have been and are, +without reference to what they might be, is wretchedly imperfect and +superficial, and always will be so, until women themselves have told +all that they have to tell. + +And this time has not come; nor will it come otherwise than +gradually. It is but of yesterday that women have either been +qualified by literary accomplishments, or permitted by society, to +tell anything to the general public. As yet very few of them dare +tell anything, which men, on whom their literary success depends, are +unwilling to hear. Let us remember in what manner, up to a very +recent time, the expression, even by a male author, of uncustomary +opinions, or what are deemed eccentric feelings, usually was, and in +some degree still is, received; and we may form some faint conception +under what impediments a woman, who is brought up to think custom and +opinion her sovereign rule, attempts to express in books anything +drawn from the depths of her own nature. The greatest woman who has +left writings behind her sufficient to give her an eminent rank in +the literature of her country, thought it necessary to prefix as a +motto to her boldest work, "Un homme peut braver l'opinion; une femme +doit s'y soumettre."[1] The greater part of what women write about +women is mere sycophancy to men. In the case of unmarried women, much +of it seems only intended to increase their chance of a husband. +Many, both married and unmarried, overstep the mark, and inculcate a +servility beyond what is desired or relished by any man, except the +very vulgarest. But this is not so often the case as, even at a quite +late period, it still was. Literary women are becoming more +freespoken, and more willing to express their real sentiments. +Unfortunately, in this country especially, they are themselves such +artificial products, that their sentiments are compounded of a small +element of individual observation and consciousness, and a very large +one of acquired associations. This will be less and less the case, +but it will remain true to a great extent, as long as social +institutions do not admit the same free development of originality in +women which is possible to men. When that time comes, and not before, +we shall see, and not merely hear, as much as it is necessary to know +of the nature of women, and the adaptation of other things to it. + +I have dwelt so much on the difficulties which at present obstruct +any real knowledge by men of the true nature of women, because in +this as in so many other things "opinio copiae inter maximas causas +inopiae est;" and there is little chance of reasonable thinking on the +matter, while people flatter themselves that they perfectly +understand a subject of which most men know absolutely nothing, and +of which it is at present impossible that any man, or all men taken +together, should have knowledge which can qualify them to lay down +the law to women as to what is, or is not, their vocation. Happily, +no such knowledge is necessary for any practical purpose connected +with the position of women in relation to society and life. For, +according to all the principles involved in modern society, the +question rests with women themselves--to be decided by their own +experience, and by the use of their own faculties. There are no means +of finding what either one person or many can do, but by trying--and +no means by which any one else can discover for them what it is for +their happiness to do or leave undone. + +One thing we may be certain of--that what is contrary to women's +nature to do, they never will be made to do by simply giving their +nature free play. The anxiety of mankind to interfere in behalf of +nature, for fear lest nature should not succeed in effecting its +purpose, is an altogether unnecessary solicitude. What women by +nature cannot do, it is quite superfluous to forbid them from doing. +What they can do, but not so well as the men who are their +competitors, competition suffices to exclude them from; since nobody +asks for protective duties and bounties in favour of women; it is +only asked that the present bounties and protective duties in favour +of men should be recalled. If women have a greater natural +inclination for some things than for others, there is no need of laws +or social inculcation to make the majority of them do the former in +preference to the latter. Whatever women's services are most wanted +for, the free play of competition will hold out the strongest +inducements to them to undertake. And, as the words imply, they are +most wanted for the things for which they are most fit; by the +apportionment of which to them, the collective faculties of the two +sexes can be applied on the whole with the greatest sum of valuable +result. + +The general opinion of men is supposed to be, that the natural +vocation of a woman is that of a wife and mother. I say, is supposed +to be, because, judging from acts--from the whole of the present +constitution of society--one might infer that their opinion was the +direct contrary. They might be supposed to think that the alleged +natural vocation of women was of all things the most repugnant to +their nature; insomuch that if they are free to do anything else--if +any other means of living, or occupation of their time and faculties, +is open, which has any chance of appearing desirable to them--there +will not be enough of them who will be willing to accept the +condition said to be natural to them. If this is the real opinion of +men in general, it would be well that it should be spoken out. I +should like to hear somebody openly enunciating the doctrine (it is +already implied in much that is written on the subject)--"It is +necessary to society that women should marry and produce children. +They will not do so unless they are compelled. Therefore it is +necessary to compel them." The merits of the case would then be +clearly defined. It would be exactly that of the slaveholders of +South Carolina and Louisiana. "It is necessary that cotton and sugar +should be grown. White men cannot produce them. Negroes will not, for +any wages which we choose to give. _Ergo_ they must be compelled." An +illustration still closer to the point is that of impressment. +Sailors must absolutely be had to defend the country. It often +happens that they will not voluntarily enlist. Therefore there must +be the power of forcing them. How often has this logic been used! +and, but for one flaw in it, without doubt it would have been +successful up to this day. But it is open to the retort--First pay +the sailors the honest value of their labour. When you have made it +as well worth their while to serve you, as to work for other +employers, you will have no more difficulty than others have in +obtaining their services. To this there is no logical answer except +"I will not:" and as people are now not only ashamed, but are not +desirous, to rob the labourer of his hire, impressment is no longer +advocated. Those who attempt to force women into marriage by closing +all other doors against them, lay themselves open to a similar +retort. If they mean what they say, their opinion must evidently be, +that men do not render the married condition so desirable to women, +as to induce them to accept it for its own recommendations. It is not +a sign of one's thinking the boon one offers very attractive, when +one allows only Hobson's choice, "that or none." And here, I believe, +is the clue to the feelings of those men, who have a real antipathy +to the equal freedom of women. I believe they are afraid, not lest +women should be unwilling to marry, for I do not think that any one +in reality has that apprehension; but lest they should insist that +marriage should be on equal conditions; lest all women of spirit and +capacity should prefer doing almost anything else, not in their own +eyes degrading, rather than marry, when marrying is giving themselves +a master, and a master too of all their earthly possessions. And +truly, if this consequence were necessarily incident to marriage, I +think that the apprehension would be very well founded. I agree in +thinking it probable that few women, capable of anything else, would, +unless under an irresistible _entrainement_, rendering them for the +time insensible to anything but itself, choose such a lot, when any +other means were open to them of filling a conventionally honourable +place in life: and if men are determined that the law of marriage +shall be a law of despotism, they are quite right, in point of mere +policy, in leaving to women only Hobson's choice. But, in that case, +all that has been done in the modern world to relax the chain on the +minds of women, has been a mistake. They never should have been +allowed to receive a literary education. Women who read, much more +women who write, are, in the existing constitution of things, a +contradiction and a disturbing element: and it was wrong to bring +women up with any acquirements but those of an odalisque, or of a +domestic servant. + +[Footnote 1: Title-page of Mme. de Stael's "Delphine."] + + + + +CHAPTER II. + + +It will be well to commence the detailed discussion of the subject by +the particular branch of it to which the course of our observations +has led us: the conditions which the laws of this and all other +countries annex to the marriage contract. Marriage being the +destination appointed by society for women, the prospect they are +brought up to, and the object which it is intended should be sought +by all of them, except those who are too little attractive to be +chosen by any man as his companion; one might have supposed that +everything would have been done to make this condition as eligible to +them as possible, that they might have no cause to regret being +denied the option of any other. Society, however, both in this, and, +at first, in all other cases, has preferred to attain its object by +foul rather than fair means: but this is the only case in which it +has substantially persisted in them even to the present day. +Originally women were taken by force, or regularly sold by their +father to the husband. Until a late period in European history, the +father had the power to dispose of his daughter in marriage at his +own will and pleasure, without any regard to hers. The Church, +indeed, was so far faithful to a better morality as to require a +formal "yes" from the woman at the marriage ceremony; but there was +nothing to shew that the consent was other than compulsory; and it +was practically impossible for the girl to refuse compliance if the +father persevered, except perhaps when she might obtain the +protection of religion by a determined resolution to take monastic +vows. After marriage, the man had anciently (but this was anterior to +Christianity) the power of life and death over his wife. She could +invoke no law against him; he was her sole tribunal and law. For a +long time he could repudiate her, but she had no corresponding power +in regard to him. By the old laws of England, the husband was called +the _lord_ of the wife; he was literally regarded as her sovereign, +inasmuch that the murder of a man by his wife was called treason +(_petty_ as distinguished from _high_ treason), and was more cruelly +avenged than was usually the case with high treason, for the penalty +was burning to death. Because these various enormities have fallen +into disuse (for most of them were never formally abolished, or not +until they had long ceased to be practised) men suppose that all is +now as it should be in regard to the marriage contract; and we are +continually told that civilization and Christianity have restored to +the woman her just rights. Meanwhile the wife is the actual +bond-servant of her husband: no less so, as far as legal obligation +goes, than slaves commonly so called. She vows a lifelong obedience +to him at the altar, and is held to it all through her life by law. +Casuists may say that the obligation of obedience stops short of +participation in crime, but it certainly extends to everything else. +She can do no act whatever but by his permission, at least tacit. She +can acquire no property but for him; the instant it becomes hers, +even if by inheritance, it becomes _ipso facto_ his. In this respect +the wife's position under the common law of England is worse than +that of slaves in the laws of many countries: by the Roman law, for +example, a slave might have his peculium, which to a certain extent +the law guaranteed to him for his exclusive use. The higher classes +in this country have given an analogous advantage to their women, +through special contracts setting aside the law, by conditions of +pin-money, &c.: since parental feeling being stronger with fathers +than the class feeling of their own sex, a father generally prefers +his own daughter to a son-in-law who is a stranger to him. By means +of settlements, the rich usually contrive to withdraw the whole or +part of the inherited property of the wife from the absolute control +of the husband: but they do not succeed in keeping it under her own +control; the utmost they can do only prevents the husband from +squandering it, at the same time debarring the rightful owner from +its use. The property itself is out of the reach of both; and as to +the income derived from it, the form of settlement most favourable to +the wife (that called "to her separate use") only precludes the +husband from receiving it instead of her: it must pass through her +hands, but if he takes it from her by personal violence as soon as +she receives it, he can neither be punished, nor compelled to +restitution. This is the amount of the protection which, under the +laws of this country, the most powerful nobleman can give to his own +daughter as respects her husband. In the immense majority of cases +there is no settlement: and the absorption of all rights, all +property, as well as all freedom of action, is complete. The two are +called "one person in law," for the purpose of inferring that +whatever is hers is his, but the parallel inference is never drawn +that whatever is his is hers; the maxim is not applied against the +man, except to make him responsible to third parties for her acts, as +a master is for the acts of his slaves or of his cattle. I am far +from pretending that wives are in general no better treated than +slaves; but no slave is a slave to the same lengths, and in so full a +sense of the word, as a wife is. Hardly any slave, except one +immediately attached to the master's person, is a slave at all hours +and all minutes; in general he has, like a soldier, his fixed task, +and when it is done, or when he is off duty, he disposes, within +certain limits, of his own time, and has a family life into which the +master rarely intrudes. "Uncle Tom" under his first master had his +own life in his "cabin," almost as much as any man whose work takes +him away from home, is able to have in his own family. But it cannot +be so with the wife. Above all, a female slave has (in Christian +countries) an admitted right, and is considered under a moral +obligation, to refuse to her master the last familiarity. Not so the +wife: however brutal a tyrant she may unfortunately be chained +to--though she may know that he hates her, though it may be his daily +pleasure to torture her, and though she may feel it impossible not to +loathe him--he can claim from her and enforce the lowest degradation +of a human being, that of being made the instrument of an animal +function contrary to her inclinations. While she is held in this +worst description of slavery as to her own person, what is her +position in regard to the children in whom she and her master have a +joint interest? They are by law _his_ children. He alone has any +legal rights over them. Not one act can she do towards or in relation +to them, except by delegation from him. Even after he is dead she is +not their legal guardian, unless he by will has made her so. He could +even send them away from her, and deprive her of the means of seeing +or corresponding with them, until this power was in some degree +restricted by Serjeant Talfourd's Act. This is her legal state. And +from this state she has no means of withdrawing herself. If she +leaves her husband, she can take nothing with her, neither her +children nor anything which is rightfully her own. If he chooses, he +can compel her to return, by law, or by physical force; or he may +content himself with seizing for his own use anything which she may +earn, or which may be given to her by her relations. It is only legal +separation by a decree of a court of justice, which entitles her to +live apart, without being forced back into the custody of an +exasperated jailer--or which empowers her to apply any earnings to +her own use, without fear that a man whom perhaps she has not seen +for twenty years will pounce upon her some day and carry all off. +This legal separation, until lately, the courts of justice would only +give at an expense which made it inaccessible to any one out of the +higher ranks. Even now it is only given in cases of desertion, or of +the extreme of cruelty; and yet complaints are made every day that it +is granted too easily. Surely, if a woman is denied any lot in life +but that of being the personal body-servant of a despot, and is +dependent for everything upon the chance of finding one who may be +disposed to make a favourite of her instead of merely a drudge, it is +a very cruel aggravation of her fate that she should be allowed to +try this chance only once. The natural sequel and corollary from this +state of things would be, that since her all in life depends upon +obtaining a good master, she should be allowed to change again and +again until she finds one. I am not saying that she ought to be +allowed this privilege. That is a totally different consideration. +The question of divorce, in the sense involving liberty of +remarriage, is one into which it is foreign to my purpose to enter. +All I now say is, that to those to whom nothing but servitude is +allowed, the free choice of servitude is the only, though a most +insufficient, alleviation. Its refusal completes the assimilation of +the wife to the slave--and the slave under not the mildest form of +slavery: for in some slave codes the slave could, under certain +circumstances of ill usage, legally compel the master to sell him. +But no amount of ill usage, without adultery superadded, will in +England free a wife from her tormentor. + +I have no desire to exaggerate, nor does the case stand in any need +of exaggeration. I have described the wife's legal position, not her +actual treatment. The laws of most countries are far worse than the +people who execute them, and many of them are only able to remain +laws by being seldom or never carried into effect. If married life +were all that it might be expected to be, looking to the laws alone, +society would be a hell upon earth. Happily there are both feelings +and interests which in many men exclude, and in most, greatly temper, +the impulses and propensities which lead to tyranny: and of those +feelings, the tie which connects a man with his wife affords, in a +normal state of things, incomparably the strongest example. The only +tie which at all approaches to it, that between him and his children, +tends, in all save exceptional cases, to strengthen, instead of +conflicting with, the first. Because this is true; because men in +general do not inflict, nor women suffer, all the misery which could +be inflicted and suffered if the full power of tyranny with which the +man is legally invested were acted on; the defenders of the existing +form of the institution think that all its iniquity is justified, and +that any complaint is merely quarrelling with the evil which is the +price paid for every great good. But the mitigations in practice, +which are compatible with maintaining in full legal force this or any +other kind of tyranny, instead of being any apology for despotism, +only serve to prove what power human nature possesses of reacting +against the vilest institutions, and with what vitality the seeds of +good as well as those of evil in human character diffuse and +propagate themselves. Not a word can be said for despotism in the +family which cannot be said for political despotism. Every absolute +king does not sit at his window to enjoy the groans of his tortured +subjects, nor strips them of their last rag and turns them out to +shiver in the road. The despotism of Louis XVI. was not the despotism +of Philippe le Bel, or of Nadir Shah, or of Caligula; but it was bad +enough to justify the French Revolution, and to palliate even its +horrors. If an appeal be made to the intense attachments which exist +between wives and their husbands, exactly as much may be said of +domestic slavery. It was quite an ordinary fact in Greece and Rome +for slaves to submit to death by torture rather than betray their +masters. In the proscriptions of the Roman civil wars it was remarked +that wives and slaves were heroically faithful, sons very commonly +treacherous. Yet we know how cruelly many Romans treated their +slaves. But in truth these intense individual feelings nowhere rise +to such a luxuriant height as under the most atrocious institutions. +It is part of the irony of life, that the strongest feelings of +devoted gratitude of which human nature seems to be susceptible, are +called forth in human beings towards those who, having the power +entirely to crush their earthly existence, voluntarily refrain from +using that power. How great a place in most men this sentiment fills, +even in religious devotion, it would be cruel to inquire. We daily +see how much their gratitude to Heaven appears to be stimulated by +the contemplation of fellow-creatures to whom God has not been so +merciful as he has to themselves. + +Whether the institution to be defended is slavery, political +absolutism, or the absolutism of the head of a family, we are always +expected to judge of it from its best instances; and we are presented +with pictures of loving exercise of authority on one side, loving +submission to it on the other--superior wisdom ordering all things +for the greatest good of the dependents, and surrounded by their +smiles and benedictions. All this would be very much to the purpose +if any one pretended that there are no such things as good men. Who +doubts that there may be great goodness, and great happiness, and +great affection, under the absolute government of a good man? +Meanwhile, laws and institutions require to be adapted, not to good +men, but to bad. Marriage is not an institution designed for a select +few. Men are not required, as a preliminary to the marriage ceremony, +to prove by testimonials that they are fit to be trusted with the +exercise of absolute power. The tie of affection and obligation to a +wife and children is very strong with those whose general social +feelings are strong, and with many who are little sensible to any +other social ties; but there are all degrees of sensibility and +insensibility to it, as there are all grades of goodness and +wickedness in men, down to those whom no ties will bind, and on whom +society has no action but through its _ultima ratio_, the penalties +of the law. In every grade of this descending scale are men to whom +are committed all the legal powers of a husband. The vilest +malefactor has some wretched woman tied to him, against whom he can +commit any atrocity except killing her, and, if tolerably cautious, +can do that without much danger of the legal penalty. And how many +thousands are there among the lowest classes in every country, who, +without being in a legal sense malefactors in any other respect, +because in every other quarter their aggressions meet with +resistance, indulge the utmost habitual excesses of bodily violence +towards the unhappy wife, who alone, at least of grown persons, can +neither repel nor escape from their brutality; and towards whom the +excess of dependence inspires their mean and savage natures, not with +a generous forbearance, and a point of honour to behave well to one +whose lot in life is trusted entirely to their kindness, but on the +contrary with a notion that the law has delivered her to them as +their thing, to be used at their pleasure, and that they are not +expected to practise the consideration towards her which is required +from them towards everybody else. The law, which till lately left +even these atrocious extremes of domestic oppression practically +unpunished, has within these few years made some feeble attempts to +repress them. But its attempts have done little, and cannot be +expected to do much, because it is contrary to reason and experience +to suppose that there can be any real check to brutality, consistent +with leaving the victim still in the power of the executioner. Until +a conviction for personal violence, or at all events a repetition of +it after a first conviction, entitles the woman _ipso facto_ to a +divorce, or at least to a judicial separation, the attempt to repress +these "aggravated assaults" by legal penalties will break down for +want of a prosecutor, or for want of a witness. + +When we consider how vast is the number of men, in any great country, +who are little higher than brutes, and that this never prevents them +from being able, through the law of marriage, to obtain a victim, the +breadth and depth of human misery caused in this shape alone by the +abuse of the institution swells to something appalling. Yet these are +only the extreme cases. They are the lowest abysses, but there is a +sad succession of depth after depth before reaching them. In domestic +as in political tyranny, the case of absolute monsters chiefly +illustrates the institution by showing that there is scarcely any +horror which may not occur under it if the despot pleases, and thus +setting in a strong light what must be the terrible frequency of +things only a little less atrocious. Absolute fiends are as rare as +angels, perhaps rarer: ferocious savages, with occasional touches of +humanity, are however very frequent: and in the wide interval which +separates these from any worthy representatives of the human species, +how many are the forms and gradations of animalism and selfishness, +often under an outward varnish of civilization and even cultivation, +living at peace with the law, maintaining a creditable appearance to +all who are not under their power, yet sufficient often to make the +lives of all who are so, a torment and a burthen to them! It would be +tiresome to repeat the commonplaces about the unfitness of men in +general for power, which, after the political discussions of +centuries, every one knows by heart, were it not that hardly any one +thinks of applying these maxims to the case in which above all others +they are applicable, that of power, not placed in the hands of a man +here and there, but offered to every adult male, down to the basest +and most ferocious. It is not because a man is not known to have +broken any of the Ten Commandments, or because he maintains a +respectable character in his dealings with those whom he cannot +compel to have intercourse with him, or because he does not fly out +into violent bursts of ill-temper against those who are not obliged +to bear with him, that it is possible to surmise of what sort his +conduct will be in the unrestraint of home. Even the commonest men +reserve the violent, the sulky, the undisguisedly selfish side of +their character for those who have no power to withstand it. The +relation of superiors to dependents is the nursery of these vices of +character, which, wherever else they exist, are an overflowing from +that source. A man who is morose or violent to his equals, is sure to +be one who has lived among inferiors, whom he could frighten or worry +into submission. If the family in its best forms is, as it is often +said to be, a school of sympathy, tenderness, and loving +forgetfulness of self, it is still oftener, as respects its chief, a +school of wilfulness, overbearingness, unbounded self-indulgence, and +a double-dyed and idealized selfishness, of which sacrifice itself is +only a particular form: the care for the wife and children being only +care for them as parts of the man's own interests and belongings, and +their individual happiness being immolated in every shape to his +smallest preferences. What better is to be looked for under the +existing form of the institution? We know that the bad propensities +of human nature are only kept within bounds when they are allowed no +scope for their indulgence. We know that from impulse and habit, when +not from deliberate purpose, almost every one to whom others yield, +goes on encroaching upon them, until a point is reached at which they +are compelled to resist. Such being the common tendency of human +nature; the almost unlimited power which present social institutions +give to the man over at least one human being--the one with whom he +resides, and whom he has always present--this power seeks out and +evokes the latent germs of selfishness in the remotest corners of his +nature--fans its faintest sparks and smouldering embers--offers to +him a license for the indulgence of those points of his original +character which in all other relations he would have found it +necessary to repress and conceal, and the repression of which would +in time have become a second nature. I know that there is another +side to the question. I grant that the wife, if she cannot +effectually resist, can at least retaliate; she, too, can make the +man's life extremely uncomfortable, and by that power is able to +carry many points which she ought, and many which she ought not, to +prevail in. But this instrument of self-protection--which may be +called the power of the scold, or the shrewish sanction--has the +fatal defect, that it avails most against the least tyrannical +superiors, and in favour of the least deserving dependents. It is the +weapon of irritable and self-willed women; of those who would make +the worst use of power if they themselves had it, and who generally +turn this power to a bad use. The amiable cannot use such an +instrument, the highminded disdain it. And on the other hand, the +husbands against whom it is used most effectively are the gentler and +more inoffensive; those who cannot be induced, even by provocation, +to resort to any very harsh exercise of authority. The wife's power +of being disagreeable generally only establishes a counter-tyranny, +and makes victims in their turn chiefly of those husbands who are +least inclined to be tyrants. + +What is it, then, which really tempers the corrupting effects of the +power, and makes it compatible with such amount of good as we +actually see? Mere feminine blandishments, though of great effect in +individual instances, have very little effect in modifying the +general tendencies of the situation; for their power only lasts while +the woman is young and attractive, often only while her charm is new, +and not dimmed by familiarity; and on many men they have not much +influence at any time. The real mitigating causes are, the personal +affection which is the growth of time, in so far as the man's nature +is susceptible of it, and the woman's character sufficiently +congenial with his to excite it; their common interests as regards +the children, and their general community of interest as concerns +third persons (to which however there are very great limitations); +the real importance of the wife to his daily comforts and enjoyments, +and the value he consequently attaches to her on his personal +account, which, in a man capable of feeling for others, lays the +foundation of caring for her on her own; and lastly, the influence +naturally acquired over almost all human beings by those near to +their persons (if not actually disagreeable to them): who, both by +their direct entreaties, and by the insensible contagion of their +feelings and dispositions, are often able, unless counteracted by +some equally strong personal influence, to obtain a degree of command +over the conduct of the superior, altogether excessive and +unreasonable. Through these various means, the wife frequently +exercises even too much power over the man; she is able to affect his +conduct in things in which she may not be qualified to influence it +for good--in which her influence may be not only unenlightened, but +employed on the morally wrong side; and in which he would act better +if left to his own prompting. But neither in the affairs of families +nor in those of states is power a compensation for the loss of +freedom. Her power often gives her what she has no right to, but does +not enable her to assert her own rights. A Sultan's favourite slave +has slaves under her, over whom she tyrannizes; but the desirable +thing would be that she should neither have slaves nor be a slave. By +entirely sinking her own existence in her husband; by having no will +(or persuading him that she has no will) but his, in anything which +regards their joint relation, and by making it the business of her +life to work upon his sentiments, a wife may gratify herself by +influencing, and very probably perverting, his conduct, in those of +his external relations which she has never qualified herself to judge +of, or in which she is herself wholly influenced by some personal or +other partiality or prejudice. Accordingly, as things now are, those +who act most kindly to their wives, are quite as often made worse, as +better, by the wife's influence, in respect to all interests +extending beyond the family. She is taught that she has no business +with things out of that sphere; and accordingly she seldom has any +honest and conscientious opinion on them; and therefore hardly ever +meddles with them for any legitimate purpose, but generally for an +interested one. She neither knows nor cares which is the right side +in politics, but she knows what will bring in money or invitations, +give her husband a title, her son a place, or her daughter a good +marriage. + +But how, it will be asked, can any society exist without government? +In a family, as in a state, some one person must be the ultimate +ruler. Who shall decide when married people differ in opinion? Both +cannot have their way, yet a decision one way or the other must be +come to. + +It is not true that in all voluntary association between two people, +one of them must be absolute master: still less that the law must +determine which of them it shall be. The most frequent case of +voluntary association, next to marriage, is partnership in business: +and it is not found or thought necessary to enact that in every +partnership, one partner shall have entire control over the concern, +and the others shall be bound to obey his orders. No one would enter +into partnership on terms which would subject him to the +responsibilities of a principal, with only the powers and privileges +of a clerk or agent. If the law dealt with other contracts as it does +with marriage, it would ordain that one partner should administer the +common business as if it was his private concern; that the others +should have only delegated powers; and that this one should be +designated by some general presumption of law, for example as being +the eldest. The law never does this: nor does experience show it to +be necessary that any theoretical inequality of power should exist +between the partners, or that the partnership should have any other +conditions than what they may themselves appoint by their articles of +agreement. Yet it might seem that the exclusive power might be +conceded with less danger to the rights and interests of the +inferior, in the case of partnership than in that of marriage, since +he is free to cancel the power by withdrawing from the connexion. The +wife has no such power, and even if she had, it is almost always +desirable that she should try all measures before resorting to it. + +It is quite true that things which have to be decided every day, and +cannot adjust themselves gradually, or wait for a compromise, ought +to depend on one will: one person must have their sole control. But +it does not follow that this should always be the same person. The +natural arrangement is a division of powers between the two; each +being absolute in the executive branch of their own department, and +any change of system and principle requiring the consent of both. The +division neither can nor should be pre-established by the law, since +it must depend on individual capacities and suitabilities. If the two +persons chose, they might pre-appoint it by the marriage contract, as +pecuniary arrangements are now often pre-appointed. There would +seldom be any difficulty in deciding such things by mutual consent, +unless the marriage was one of those unhappy ones in which all other +things, as well as this, become subjects of bickering and dispute. +The division of rights would naturally follow the division of duties +and functions; and that is already made by consent, or at all events +not by law, but by general custom, modified and modifiable at the +pleasure of the persons concerned. + +The real practical decision of affairs, to whichever may be given the +legal authority, will greatly depend, as it even now does, upon +comparative qualifications. The mere fact that he is usually the +eldest, will in most cases give the preponderance to the man; at +least until they both attain a time of life at which the difference +in their years is of no importance. There will naturally also be a +more potential voice on the side, whichever it is, that brings the +means of support. Inequality from this source does not depend on the +law of marriage, but on the general conditions of human society, as +now constituted. The influence of mental superiority, either general +or special, and of superior decision of character, will necessarily +tell for much. It always does so at present. And this fact shows how +little foundation there is for the apprehension that the powers and +responsibilities of partners in life (as of partners in business), +cannot be satisfactorily apportioned by agreement between themselves. +They always are so apportioned, except in cases in which the marriage +institution is a failure. Things never come to an issue of downright +power on one side, and obedience on the other, except where the +connexion altogether has been a mistake, and it would be a blessing +to both parties to be relieved from it. Some may say that the very +thing by which an amicable settlement of differences becomes +possible, is the power of legal compulsion known to be in reserve; as +people submit to an arbitration because there is a court of law in +the background, which they know that they can be forced to obey. But +to make the cases parallel, we must suppose that the rule of the +court of law was, not to try the cause, but to give judgment always +for the same side, suppose the defendant. If so, the amenability to +it would be a motive with the plaintiff to agree to almost any +arbitration, but it would be just the reverse with the defendant. The +despotic power which the law gives to the husband may be a reason to +make the wife assent to any compromise by which power is practically +shared between the two, but it cannot be the reason why the husband +does. That there is always among decently conducted people a +practical compromise, though one of them at least is under no +physical or moral necessity of making it, shows that the natural +motives which lead to a voluntary adjustment of the united life of +two persons in a manner acceptable to both, do on the whole, except +in unfavourable cases, prevail. The matter is certainly not improved +by laying down as an ordinance of law, that the superstructure of +free government shall be raised upon a legal basis of despotism on +one side and subjection on the other, and that every concession which +the despot makes may, at his mere pleasure, and without any warning, +be recalled. Besides that no freedom is worth much when held on so +precarious a tenure, its conditions are not likely to be the most +equitable when the law throws so prodigious a weight into one scale; +when the adjustment rests between two persons one of whom is declared +to be entitled to everything, the other not only entitled to nothing +except during the good pleasure of the first, but under the strongest +moral and religious obligation not to rebel under any excess of +oppression. + +A pertinacious adversary, pushed to extremities, may say, that +husbands indeed are willing to be reasonable, and to make fair +concessions to their partners without being compelled to it, but that +wives are not: that if allowed any rights of their own, they will +acknowledge no rights at all in any one else, and never will yield in +anything, unless they can be compelled, by the man's mere authority, +to yield in everything. This would have been said by many persons +some generations ago, when satires on women were in vogue, and men +thought it a clever thing to insult women for being what men made +them. But it will be said by no one now who is worth replying to. It +is not the doctrine of the present day that women are less +susceptible of good feeling, and consideration for those with whom +they are united by the strongest ties, than men are. On the contrary, +we are perpetually told that women are better than men, by those who +are totally opposed to treating them as if they were as good; so that +the saying has passed into a piece of tiresome cant, intended to put +a complimentary face upon an injury, and resembling those +celebrations of royal clemency which, according to Gulliver, the king +of Lilliput always prefixed to his most sanguinary decrees. If women +are better than men in anything, it surely is in individual +self-sacrifice for those of their own family. But I lay little stress +on this, so long as they are universally taught that they are born +and created for self-sacrifice. I believe that equality of rights +would abate the exaggerated self-abnegation which is the present +artificial ideal of feminine character, and that a good woman would +not be more self-sacrificing than the best man: but on the other +hand, men would be much more unselfish and self-sacrificing than at +present, because they would no longer be taught to worship their own +will as such a grand thing that it is actually the law for another +rational being. There is nothing which men so easily learn as this +self-worship: all privileged persons, and all privileged classes, +have had it. The more we descend in the scale of humanity, the +intenser it is; and most of all in those who are not, and can never +expect to be, raised above any one except an unfortunate wife and +children. The honourable exceptions are proportionally fewer than in +the case of almost any other human infirmity. Philosophy and +religion, instead of keeping it in check, are generally suborned to +defend it; and nothing controls it but that practical feeling of the +equality of human beings, which is the theory of Christianity, but +which Christianity will never practically teach, while it sanctions +institutions grounded on an arbitrary preference of one human being +over another. + +There are, no doubt, women, as there are men, whom equality of +consideration will not satisfy; with whom there is no peace while any +will or wish is regarded but their own. Such persons are a proper +subject for the law of divorce. They are only fit to live alone, and +no human beings ought to be compelled to associate their lives with +them. But the legal subordination tends to make such characters among +women more, rather than less, frequent. If the man exerts his whole +power, the woman is of course crushed: but if she is treated with +indulgence, and permitted to assume power, there is no rule to set +limits to her encroachments. The law, not determining her rights, but +theoretically allowing her none at all, practically declares that the +measure of what she has a right to, is what she can contrive to get. + +The equality of married persons before the law, is not only the sole +mode in which that particular relation can be made consistent with +justice to both sides, and conducive to the happiness of both, but it +is the only means of rendering the daily life of mankind, in any high +sense, a school of moral cultivation. Though the truth may not be +felt or generally acknowledged for generations to come, the only +school of genuine moral sentiment is society between equals. The +moral education of mankind has hitherto emanated chiefly from the law +of force, and is adapted almost solely to the relations which force +creates. In the less advanced states of society, people hardly +recognise any relation with their equals. To be an equal is to be an +enemy. Society, from its highest place to its lowest, is one long +chain, or rather ladder, where every individual is either above or +below his nearest neighbour, and wherever he does not command he must +obey. Existing moralities, accordingly, are mainly fitted to a +relation of command and obedience. Yet command and obedience are but +unfortunate necessities of human life: society in equality is its +normal state. Already in modern life, and more and more as it +progressively improves, command and obedience become exceptional +facts in life, equal association its general rule. The morality of +the first ages rested on the obligation to submit to power; that of +the ages next following, on the right of the weak to the forbearance +and protection of the strong. How much longer is one form of society +and life to content itself with the morality made for another? We +have had the morality of submission, and the morality of chivalry and +generosity; the time is now come for the morality of justice. +Whenever, in former ages, any approach has been made to society in +equality, Justice has asserted its claims as the foundation of +virtue. It was thus in the free republics of antiquity. But even in +the best of these, the equals were limited to the free male citizens; +slaves, women, and the unenfranchised residents were under the law of +force. The joint influence of Roman civilization and of Christianity +obliterated these distinctions, and in theory (if only partially in +practice) declared the claims of the human being, as such, to be +paramount to those of sex, class, or social position. The barriers +which had begun to be levelled were raised again by the northern +conquests; and the whole of modern history consists of the slow +process by which they have since been wearing away. We are entering +into an order of things in which justice will again be the primary +virtue; grounded as before on equal, but now also on sympathetic +association; having its root no longer in the instinct of equals for +self-protection, but in a cultivated sympathy between them; and no +one being now left out, but an equal measure being extended to all. +It is no novelty that mankind do not distinctly foresee their own +changes, and that their sentiments are adapted to past, not to coming +ages. To see the futurity of the species has always been the +privilege of the intellectual elite, or of those who have learnt from +them; to have the feelings of that futurity has been the distinction, +and usually the martyrdom, of a still rarer elite. Institutions, +books, education, society, all go on training human beings for the +old, long after the new has come; much more when it is only coming. +But the true virtue of human beings is fitness to live together as +equals; claiming nothing for themselves but what they as freely +concede to every one else; regarding command of any kind as an +exceptional necessity, and in all cases a temporary one; and +preferring, whenever possible, the society of those with whom leading +and following can be alternate and reciprocal. To these virtues, +nothing in life as at present constituted gives cultivation by +exercise. The family is a school of despotism, in which the virtues +of despotism, but also its vices, are largely nourished. Citizenship, +in free countries, is partly a school of society in equality; but +citizenship fills only a small place in modern life, and does not +come near the daily habits or inmost sentiments. The family, justly +constituted, would be the real school of the virtues of freedom. It +is sure to be a sufficient one of everything else. It will always be +a school of obedience for the children, of command for the parents. +What is needed is, that it should be a school of sympathy in +equality, of living together in love, without power on one side or +obedience on the other. This it ought to be between the parents. It +would then be an exercise of those virtues which each requires to fit +them for all other association, and a model to the children of the +feelings and conduct which their temporary training by means of +obedience is designed to render habitual, and therefore natural, to +them. The moral training of mankind will never be adapted to the +conditions of the life for which all other human progress is a +preparation, until they practise in the family the same moral rule +which is adapted to the normal constitution of human society. Any +sentiment of freedom which can exist in a man whose nearest and +dearest intimacies are with those of whom he is absolute master, is +not the genuine or Christian love of freedom, but, what the love of +freedom generally was in the ancients and in the middle ages--an +intense feeling of the dignity and importance of his own personality; +making him disdain a yoke for himself, of which he has no abhorrence +whatever in the abstract, but which he is abundantly ready to impose +on others for his own interest or glorification. + +I readily admit (and it is the very foundation of my hopes) that +numbers of married people even under the present law, (in the higher +classes of England probably a great majority,) live in the spirit of +a just law of equality. Laws never would be improved, if there were +not numerous persons whose moral sentiments are better than the +existing laws. Such persons ought to support the principles here +advocated; of which the only object is to make all other married +couples similar to what these are now. But persons even of +considerable moral worth, unless they are also thinkers, are very +ready to believe that laws or practices, the evils of which they have +not personally experienced, do not produce any evils, but (if seeming +to be generally approved of) probably do good, and that it is wrong +to object to them. It would, however, be a great mistake in such +married people to suppose, because the legal conditions of the tie +which unites them do not occur to their thoughts once in a +twelvemonth, and because they live and feel in all respects as if +they were legally equals, that the same is the case with all other +married couples, wherever the husband is not a notorious ruffian. To +suppose this, would be to show equal ignorance of human nature and of +fact. The less fit a man is for the possession of power--the less +likely to be allowed to exercise it over any person with that +person's voluntary consent--the more does he hug himself in the +consciousness of the power the law gives him, exact its legal rights +to the utmost point which custom (the custom of men like himself) +will tolerate, and take pleasure in using the power, merely to +enliven the agreeable sense of possessing it. What is more; in the +most naturally brutal and morally uneducated part of the lower +classes, the legal slavery of the woman, and something in the merely +physical subjection to their will as an instrument, causes them to +feel a sort of disrespect and contempt towards their own wife which +they do not feel towards any other woman, or any other human being, +with whom they come in contact; and which makes her seem to them an +appropriate subject for any kind of indignity. Let an acute observer +of the signs of feeling, who has the requisite opportunities, judge +for himself whether this is not the case: and if he finds that it is, +let him not wonder at any amount of disgust and indignation that can +be felt against institutions which lead naturally to this depraved +state of the human mind. + +We shall be told, perhaps, that religion imposes the duty of +obedience; as every established fact which is too bad to admit of any +other defence, is always presented to us as an injunction of +religion. The Church, it is very true, enjoins it in her formularies, +but it would be difficult to derive any such injunction from +Christianity. We are told that St. Paul said, "Wives, obey your +husbands:" but he also said, "Slaves, obey your masters." It was not +St. Paul's business, nor was it consistent with his object, the +propagation of Christianity, to incite any one to rebellion against +existing laws. The apostle's acceptance of all social institutions as +he found them, is no more to be construed as a disapproval of +attempts to improve them at the proper time, than his declaration, +"The powers that be are ordained of God," gives his sanction to +military despotism, and to that alone, as the Christian form of +political government, or commands passive obedience to it. To pretend +that Christianity was intended to stereotype existing forms of +government and society, and protect them against change, is to reduce +it to the level of Islamism or of Brahminism. It is precisely because +Christianity has not done this, that it has been the religion of the +progressive portion of mankind, and Islamism, Brahminism, &c., have +been those of the stationary portions; or rather (for there is no +such thing as a really stationary society) of the declining portions. +There have been abundance of people, in all ages of Christianity, who +tried to make it something of the same kind; to convert us into a +sort of Christian Mussulmans, with the Bible for a Koran, prohibiting +all improvement: and great has been their power, and many have had to +sacrifice their lives in resisting them. But they have been resisted, +and the resistance has made us what we are, and will yet make us what +we are to be. + +After what has been said respecting the obligation of obedience, it +is almost superfluous to say anything concerning the more special +point included in the general one--a woman's right to her own +property; for I need not hope that this treatise can make any +impression upon those who need anything to convince them that a +woman's inheritance or gains ought to be as much her own after +marriage as before. The rule is simple: whatever would be the +husband's or wife's if they were not married, should be under their +exclusive control during marriage; which need not interfere with the +power to tie up property by settlement, in order to preserve it for +children. Some people are sentimentally shocked at the idea of a +separate interest in money matters, as inconsistent with the ideal +fusion of two lives into one. For my own part, I am one of the +strongest supporters of community of goods, when resulting from an +entire unity of feeling in the owners, which makes all things common +between them. But I have no relish for a community of goods resting +on the doctrine, that what is mine is yours but what is yours is not +mine; and I should prefer to decline entering into such a compact +with any one, though I were myself the person to profit by it. + +This particular injustice and oppression to women, which is, to +common apprehensions, more obvious than all the rest, admits of +remedy without interfering with any other mischiefs: and there can be +little doubt that it will be one of the earliest remedied. Already, +in many of the new and several of the old States of the American +Confederation, provisions have been inserted even in the written +Constitutions, securing to women equality of rights in this respect: +and thereby improving materially the position, in the marriage +relation, of those women at least who have property, by leaving them +one instrument of power which they have not signed away; and +preventing also the scandalous abuse of the marriage institution, +which is perpetrated when a man entraps a girl into marrying him +without a settlement, for the sole purpose of getting possession of +her money. When the support of the family depends, not on property, +but on earnings, the common arrangement, by which the man earns the +income and the wife superintends the domestic expenditure, seems to +me in general the most suitable division of labour between the two +persons. If, in addition to the physical suffering of bearing +children, and the whole responsibility of their care and education in +early years, the wife undertakes the careful and economical +application of the husband's earnings to the general comfort of the +family; she takes not only her fair share, but usually the larger +share, of the bodily and mental exertion required by their joint +existence. If she undertakes any additional portion, it seldom +relieves her from this, but only prevents her from performing it +properly. The care which she is herself disabled from taking of the +children and the household, nobody else takes; those of the children +who do not die, grow up as they best can, and the management of the +household is likely to be so bad, as even in point of economy to be a +great drawback from the value of the wife's earnings. In an otherwise +just state of things, it is not, therefore, I think, a desirable +custom, that the wife should contribute by her labour to the income +of the family. In an unjust state of things, her doing so may be +useful to her, by making her of more value in the eyes of the man who +is legally her master; but, on the other hand, it enables him still +farther to abuse his power, by forcing her to work, and leaving the +support of the family to her exertions, while he spends most of his +time in drinking and idleness. The _power_ of earning is essential to +the dignity of a woman, if she has not independent property. But if +marriage were an equal contract, not implying the obligation of +obedience; if the connexion were no longer enforced to the oppression +of those to whom it is purely a mischief, but a separation, on just +terms (I do not now speak of a divorce), could be obtained by any +woman who was morally entitled to it; and if she would then find all +honourable employments as freely open to her as to men; it would not +be necessary for her protection, that during marriage she should make +this particular use of her faculties. Like a man when he chooses a +profession, so, when a woman marries, it may in general be understood +that she makes choice of the management of a household, and the +bringing up of a family, as the first call upon her exertions, during +as many years of her life as may be required for the purpose; and +that she renounces, not all other objects and occupations, but all +which are not consistent with the requirements of this. The actual +exercise, in a habitual or systematic manner, of outdoor occupations, +or such as cannot be carried on at home, would by this principle be +practically interdicted to the greater number of married women. But +the utmost latitude ought to exist for the adaptation of general +rules to individual suitabilities; and there ought to be nothing to +prevent faculties exceptionally adapted to any other pursuit, from +obeying their vocation notwithstanding marriage: due provision being +made for supplying otherwise any falling-short which might become +inevitable, in her full performance of the ordinary functions of +mistress of a family. These things, if once opinion were rightly +directed on the subject, might with perfect safety be left to be +regulated by opinion, without any interference of law. + + + + +CHAPTER III. + + +On the other point which is involved in the just equality of women, +their admissibility to all the functions and occupations hitherto +retained as the monopoly of the stronger sex, I should anticipate no +difficulty in convincing any one who has gone with me on the subject +of the equality of women in the family. I believe that their +disabilities elsewhere are only clung to in order to maintain their +subordination in domestic life; because the generality of the male +sex cannot yet tolerate the idea of living with an equal. Were it not +for that, I think that almost every one, in the existing state of +opinion in politics and political economy, would admit the injustice +of excluding half the human race from the greater number of lucrative +occupations, and from almost all high social functions; ordaining +from their birth either that they are not, and cannot by any +possibility become, fit for employments which are legally open to the +stupidest and basest of the other sex, or else that however fit they +may be, those employments shall be interdicted to them, in order to +be preserved for the exclusive benefit of males. In the last two +centuries, when (which was seldom the case) any reason beyond the +mere existence of the fact was thought to be required to justify the +disabilities of women, people seldom assigned as a reason their +inferior mental capacity; which, in times when there was a real trial +of personal faculties (from which all women were not excluded) in the +struggles of public life, no one really believed in. The reason given +in those days was not women's unfitness, but the interest of society, +by which was meant the interest of men: just as the _raison d'etat_, +meaning the convenience of the government, and the support of +existing authority, was deemed a sufficient explanation and excuse +for the most flagitious crimes. In the present day, power holds a +smoother language, and whomsoever it oppresses, always pretends to do +so for their own good: accordingly, when anything is forbidden to +women, it is thought necessary to say, and desirable to believe, that +they are incapable of doing it, and that they depart from their real +path of success and happiness when they aspire to it. But to make +this reason plausible (I do not say valid), those by whom it is urged +must be prepared to carry it to a much greater length than any one +ventures to do in the face of present experience. It is not +sufficient to maintain that women on the average are less gifted than +men on the average, with certain of the higher mental faculties, or +that a smaller number of women than of men are fit for occupations +and functions of the highest intellectual character. It is necessary +to maintain that no women at all are fit for them, and that the most +eminent women are inferior in mental faculties to the most mediocre +of the men on whom those functions at present devolve. For if the +performance of the function is decided either by competition, or by +any mode of choice which secures regard to the public interest, there +needs be no apprehension that any important employments will fall +into the hands of women inferior to average men, or to the average of +their male competitors. The only result would be that there would be +fewer women than men in such employments; a result certain to happen +in any ease, if only from the preference always likely to be felt by +the majority of women for the one vocation in which there is nobody +to compete with them. Now, the most determined depreciator of women +will not venture to deny, that when we add the experience of recent +times to that of ages past, women, and not a few merely, but many +women, have proved themselves capable of everything, perhaps without +a single exception, which is done by men, and of doing it +successfully and creditably. The utmost that can be said is, that +there are many things which none of them have succeeded in doing as +well as they have been done by some men--many in which they have not +reached the very highest rank. But there are extremely few, dependent +only on mental faculties, in which they have not attained the rank +next to the highest. Is not this enough, and much more than enough, +to make it a tyranny to them, and a detriment to society, that they +should not be allowed to compete with men for the exercise of these +functions? Is it not a mere truism to say, that such functions are +often filled by men far less fit for them than numbers of women, and +who would be beaten by women in any fair field of competition? What +difference does it make that there may be men somewhere, fully +employed about other things, who may be still better qualified for +the things in question than these women? Does not this take place in +all competitions? Is there so great a superfluity of men fit for high +duties, that society can afford to reject the service of any +competent person? Are we so certain of always finding a man made to +our hands for any duty or function of social importance which falls +vacant, that we lose nothing by putting a ban upon one-half of +mankind, and refusing beforehand to make their faculties available, +however distinguished they may be? And even if we could do without +them, would it be consistent with justice to refuse to them their +fair share of honour and distinction, or to deny to them the equal +moral right of all human beings to choose their occupation (short of +injury to others) according to their own preferences, at their own +risk? Nor is the injustice confined to them: it is shared by those +who are in a position to benefit by their services. To ordain that +any kind of persons shall not be physicians, or shall not be +advocates, or shall not be members of parliament, is to injure not +them only, but all who employ physicians or advocates, or elect +members of parliament, and who are deprived of the stimulating effect +of greater competition on the exertions of the competitors, as well +as restricted to a narrower range of individual choice. + +It will perhaps be sufficient if I confine myself, in the details of +my argument, to functions of a public nature: since, if I am +successful as to those, it probably will be readily granted that +women should be admissible to all other occupations to which it is at +all material whether they are admitted or not. And here let me begin +by marking out one function, broadly distinguished from all others, +their right to which is entirely independent of any question which +can be raised concerning their faculties. I mean the suffrage, both +parliamentary and municipal. The right to share in the choice of +those who are to exercise a public trust, is altogether a distinct +thing from that of competing for the trust itself. If no one could +vote for a member of parliament who was not fit to be a candidate, +the government would be a narrow oligarchy indeed. To have a voice in +choosing those by whom one is to be governed, is a means of +self-protection due to every one, though he were to remain for ever +excluded from the function of governing: and that women are +considered fit to have such a choice, may be presumed from the fact, +that the law already gives it to women in the most important of all +cases to themselves: for the choice of the man who is to govern a +woman to the end of life, is always supposed to be voluntarily made +by herself. In the case of election to public trusts, it is the +business of constitutional law to surround the right of suffrage with +all needful securities and limitations; but whatever securities are +sufficient in the case of the male sex, no others need be required in +the case of women. Under whatever conditions, and within whatever +limits, men are admitted to the suffrage, there is not a shadow of +justification for not admitting women under the same. The majority of +the women of any class are not likely to differ in political opinion +from the majority of the men of the same class, unless the question +be one in which the interests of women, as such, are in some way +involved; and if they are so, women require the suffrage, as their +guarantee of just and equal consideration. This ought to be obvious +even to those who coincide in no other of the doctrines for which I +contend. Even if every woman were a wife, and if every wife ought to +be a slave, all the more would these slaves stand in need of legal +protection: and we know what legal protection the slaves have, where +the laws are made by their masters. + +With regard to the fitness of women, not only to participate in +elections, but themselves to hold offices or practise professions +involving important public responsibilities; I have already observed +that this consideration is not essential to the practical question in +dispute: since any woman, who succeeds in an open profession, proves +by that very fact that she is qualified for it. And in the case of +public offices, if the political system of the country is such as to +exclude unfit men, it will equally exclude unfit women: while if it +is not, there is no additional evil in the fact that the unfit +persons whom it admits may be either women or men. As long therefore +as it is acknowledged that even a few women may be fit for these +duties, the laws which shut the door on those exceptions cannot be +justified by any opinion which can be held respecting the capacities +of women in general. But, though this last consideration is not +essential, it is far from being irrelevant. An unprejudiced view of +it gives additional strength to the arguments against the +disabilities of women, and reinforces them by high considerations of +practical utility. + +Let us at first make entire abstraction of all psychological +considerations tending to show, that any of the mental differences +supposed to exist between women and men are but the natural effect of +the differences in their education and circumstances, and indicate no +radical difference, far less radical inferiority, of nature. Let us +consider women only as they already are, or as they are known to have +been; and the capacities which they have already practically shown. +What they have done, that at least, if nothing else, it is proved +that they can do. When we consider how sedulously they are all +trained away from, instead of being trained towards, any of the +occupations or objects reserved for men, it is evident that I am +taking a very humble ground for them, when I rest their case on what +they have actually achieved. For, in this case, negative evidence is +worth little, while any positive evidence is conclusive. It cannot be +inferred to be impossible that a woman should be a Homer, or an +Aristotle, or a Michael Angelo, or a Beethoven, because no woman has +yet actually produced works comparable to theirs in any of those +lines of excellence. This negative fact at most leaves the question +uncertain, and open to psychological discussion. But it is quite +certain that a woman can be a Queen Elizabeth, or a Deborah, or a +Joan of Arc, since this is not inference, but fact. Now it is a +curious consideration, that the only things which the existing law +excludes women from doing, are the things which they have proved that +they are able to do. There is no law to prevent a woman from having +written all the plays of Shakspeare, or composed all the operas of +Mozart. But Queen Elizabeth or Queen Victoria, had they not inherited +the throne, could not have been intrusted with the smallest of the +political duties, of which the former showed herself equal to the +greatest. + +If anything conclusive could be inferred from experience, without +psychological analysis, it would be that the things which women are +not allowed to do are the very ones for which they are peculiarly +qualified; since their vocation for government has made its way, and +become conspicuous, through the very few opportunities which have +been given; while in the lines of distinction which apparently were +freely open to them, they have by no means so eminently distinguished +themselves. We know how small a number of reigning queens history +presents, in comparison with that of kings. Of this smaller number a +far larger proportion have shown talents for rule; though many of +them have occupied the throne in difficult periods. It is remarkable, +too, that they have, in a great number of instances, been +distinguished by merits the most opposite to the imaginary and +conventional character of women: they have been as much remarked for +the firmness and vigour of their rule, as for its intelligence. When, +to queens and empresses, we add regents, and viceroys of provinces, +the list of women who have been eminent rulers of mankind swells to a +great length.[1] This fact is so undeniable, that some one, long ago, +tried to retort the argument, and turned the admitted truth into an +additional insult, by saying that queens are better than kings, +because under kings women govern, but under queens, men. + +It may seem a waste of reasoning to argue against a bad joke; but +such things do affect people's minds; and I have heard men quote this +saying, with an air as if they thought that there was something in +it. At any rate, it will serve as well as anything else for a +starting point in discussion. I say, then, that it is not true that +under kings, women govern. Such cases are entirely exceptional: and +weak kings have quite as often governed ill through the influence of +male favourites, as of female. When a king is governed by a woman +merely through his amatory propensities, good government is not +probable, though even then there are exceptions. But French history +counts two kings who have voluntarily given the direction of affairs +during many years, the one to his mother, the other to his sister: +one of them, Charles VIII., was a mere boy, but in doing so he +followed the intentions of his father Louis XI., the ablest monarch +of his age. The other, Saint Louis, was the best, and one of the most +vigorous rulers, since the time of Charlemagne. Both these princesses +ruled in a manner hardly equalled by any prince among their +contemporaries. The emperor Charles the Fifth, the most politic +prince of his time, who had as great a number of able men in his +service as a ruler ever had, and was one of the least likely of all +sovereigns to sacrifice his interest to personal feelings, made two +princesses of his family successively Governors of the Netherlands, +and kept one or other of them in that post during his whole life, +(they were afterwards succeeded by a third). Both ruled very +successfully, and one of them, Margaret of Austria, was one of the +ablest politicians of the age. So much for one side of the question. +Now as to the other. When it is said that under queens men govern, is +the same meaning to be understood as when kings are said to be +governed by women? Is it meant that queens choose as their +instruments of government, the associates of their personal +pleasures? The case is rare even with those who are as unscrupulous +on the latter point as Catherine II.: and it is not in these cases +that the good government, alleged to arise from male influence, is to +be found. If it be true, then, that the administration is in the +hands of better men under a queen than under an average king, it must +be that queens have a superior capacity for choosing them; and women +must be better qualified than men both for the position of sovereign, +and for that of chief minister; for the principal business of a prime +minister is not to govern in person, but to find the fittest persons +to conduct every department of public affairs. The more rapid insight +into character, which is one of the admitted points of superiority in +women over men, must certainly make them, with anything like parity +of qualifications in other respects, more apt than men in that choice +of instruments, which is nearly the most important business of every +one who has to do with governing mankind. Even the unprincipled +Catherine de' Medici could feel the value of a Chancellor de +l'Hopital. But it is also true that most great queens have been great +by their own talents for government, and have been well served +precisely for that reason. They retained the supreme direction of +affairs in their own hands: and if they listened to good advisers, +they gave by that fact the strongest proof that their judgment fitted +them for dealing with the great questions of government. + +Is it reasonable to think that those who are fit for the greater +functions of politics, are incapable of qualifying themselves for the +less? Is there any reason in the nature of things, that the wives and +sisters of princes should, whenever called on, be found as competent +as the princes themselves to _their_ business, but that the wives and +sisters of statesmen, and administrators, and directors of companies, +and managers of public institutions, should be unable to do what is +done by their brothers and husbands? The real reason is plain enough; +it is that princesses, being more raised above the generality of men +by their rank than placed below them by their sex, have never been +taught that it was improper for them to concern themselves with +politics; but have been allowed to feel the liberal interest natural +to any cultivated human being, in the great transactions which took +place around them, and in which they might be called on to take a +part. The ladies of reigning families are the only women who are +allowed the same range of interests and freedom of development as +men; and it is precisely in their case that there is not found to be +any inferiority. Exactly where and in proportion as women's +capacities for government have been tried, in that proportion have +they been found adequate. + +This fact is in accordance with the best general conclusions which +the world's imperfect experience seems as yet to suggest, concerning +the peculiar tendencies and aptitudes characteristic of women, as +women have hitherto been. I do not say, as they will continue to be; +for, as I have already said more than once, I consider it presumption +in any one to pretend to decide what women are or are not, can or +cannot be, by natural constitution. They have always hitherto been +kept, as far as regards spontaneous development, in so unnatural a +state, that their nature cannot but have been greatly distorted and +disguised; and no one can safely pronounce that if women's nature +were left to choose its direction as freely as men's, and if no +artificial bent were attempted to be given to it except that required +by the conditions of human society, and given to both sexes alike, +there would be any material difference, or perhaps any difference at +all, in the character and capacities which would unfold themselves. I +shall presently show, that even the least contestable of the +differences which now exist, are such as may very well have been +produced merely by circumstances, without any difference of natural +capacity. But, looking at women as they are known in experience, it +may be said of them, with more truth than belongs to most other +generalizations on the subject, that the general bent of their +talents is towards the practical. This statement is conformable to +all the public history of women, in the present and the past. It is +no less borne out by common and daily experience. Let us consider the +special nature of the mental capacities most characteristic of a +woman of talent. They are all of a kind which fits them for practice, +and makes them tend towards it. What is meant by a woman's capacity +of intuitive perception? It means, a rapid and correct insight into +present fact. It has nothing to do with general principles. Nobody +ever perceived a scientific law of nature by intuition, nor arrived +at a general rule of duty or prudence by it. These are results of +slow and careful collection and comparison of experience; and neither +the men nor the women of intuition usually shine in this department, +unless, indeed, the experience necessary is such as they can acquire +by themselves. For what is called their intuitive sagacity makes them +peculiarly apt in gathering such general truths as can be collected +from their individual means of observation. When, consequently, they +chance to be as well provided as men are with the results of other +people's experience, by reading and education, (I use the word chance +advisedly, for, in respect to the knowledge that tends to fit them +for the greater concerns of life, the only educated women are the +self-educated) they are better furnished than men in general with the +essential requisites of skilful and successful practice. Men who have +been much taught, are apt to be deficient in the sense of present +fact; they do not see, in the facts which they are called upon to +deal with, what is really there, but what they have been taught to +expect. This is seldom the case with women of any ability. Their +capacity of "intuition" preserves them from it. With equality of +experience and of general faculties, a woman usually sees much more +than a man of what is immediately before her. Now this sensibility to +the present, is the main quality on which the capacity for practice, +as distinguished from theory, depends. To discover general +principles, belongs to the speculative faculty: to discern and +discriminate the particular cases in which they are and are not +applicable, constitutes practical talent: and for this, women as they +now are have a peculiar aptitude. I admit that there can be no good +practice without principles, and that the predominant place which +quickness of observation holds among a woman's faculties, makes her +particularly apt to build over-hasty generalizations upon her own +observation; though at the same time no less ready in rectifying +those generalizations, as her observation takes a wider range. But +the corrective to this defect, is access to the experience of the +human race; general knowledge--exactly the thing which education can +best supply. A woman's mistakes are specifically those of a clever +self-educated man, who often sees what men trained in routine do not +see, but falls into errors for want of knowing things which have long +been known. Of course he has acquired much of the pre-existing +knowledge, or he could not have got on at all; but what he knows of +it he has picked up in fragments and at random, as women do. + +But this gravitation of women's minds to the present, to the real, to +actual fact, while in its exclusiveness it is a source of errors, is +also a most useful counteractive of the contrary error. The principal +and most characteristic aberration of speculative minds as such, +consists precisely in the deficiency of this lively perception and +ever-present sense of objective fact. For want of this, they often +not only overlook the contradiction which outward facts oppose to +their theories, but lose sight of the legitimate purpose of +speculation altogether, and let their speculative faculties go astray +into regions not peopled with real beings, animate or inanimate, even +idealized, but with personified shadows created by the illusions of +metaphysics or by the mere entanglement of words, and think these +shadows the proper objects of the highest, the most transcendant, +philosophy. Hardly anything can be of greater value to a man of +theory and speculation who employs himself not in collecting +materials of knowledge by observation, but in working them up by +processes of thought into comprehensive truths of science and laws of +conduct, than to carry on his speculations in the companionship, and +under the criticism, of a really superior woman. There is nothing +comparable to it for keeping his thoughts within the limits of real +things, and the actual facts of nature. A woman seldom runs wild +after an abstraction. The habitual direction of her mind to dealing +with things as individuals rather than in groups, and (what is +closely connected with it) her more lively interest in the present +feelings of persons, which makes her consider first of all, in +anything which claims to be applied to practice, in what manner +persons will be affected by it--these two things make her extremely +unlikely to put faith in any speculation which loses sight of +individuals, and deals with things as if they existed for the benefit +of some imaginary entity, some mere creation of the mind, not +resolvable into the feelings of living beings. Women's thoughts are +thus as useful in giving reality to those of thinking men, as men's +thoughts in giving width and largeness to those of women. In depth, +as distinguished from breadth, I greatly doubt if even now, women, +compared with men, are at any disadvantage. + +If the existing mental characteristics of women are thus valuable +even in aid of speculation, they are still more important, when +speculation has done its work, for carrying out the results of +speculation into practice. For the reasons already given, women are +comparatively unlikely to fall into the common error of men, that of +sticking to their rules in a case whose specialities either take it +out of the class to which the rules are applicable, or require a +special adaptation of them. Let us now consider another of the +admitted superiorities of clever women, greater quickness of +apprehension. Is not this pre-eminently a quality which fits a person +for practice? In action, everything continually depends upon deciding +promptly. In speculation, nothing does. A mere thinker can wait, can +take time to consider, can collect additional evidence; he is not +obliged to complete his philosophy at once, lest the opportunity +should go by. The power of drawing the best conclusion possible from +insufficient data is not indeed useless in philosophy; the +construction of a provisional hypothesis consistent with all known +facts is often the needful basis for further inquiry. But this +faculty is rather serviceable in philosophy, than the main +qualification for it: and, for the auxiliary as well as for the main +operation, the philosopher can allow himself any time he pleases. He +is in no need of the capacity of doing rapidly what he does; what he +rather needs is patience, to work on slowly until imperfect lights +have become perfect, and a conjecture has ripened into a theorem. For +those, on the contrary, whose business is with the fugitive and +perishable--with individual facts, not kinds of facts--rapidity of +thought is a qualification next only in importance to the power of +thought itself. He who has not his faculties under immediate command, +in the contingencies of action, might as well not have them at all. +He may be fit to criticize, but he is not fit to act. Now it is in +this that women, and the men who are most like women, confessedly +excel. The other sort of man, however pre-eminent may be his +faculties, arrives slowly at complete command of them: rapidity of +judgment and promptitude of judicious action, even in the things he +knows best, are the gradual and late result of strenuous effort grown +into habit. + +It will be said, perhaps, that the greater nervous susceptibility of +women is a disqualification for practice, in anything but domestic +life, by rendering them mobile, changeable, too vehemently under the +influence of the moment, incapable of dogged perseverance, unequal +and uncertain in the power of using their faculties. I think that +these phrases sum up the greater part of the objections commonly made +to the fitness of women for the higher class of serious business. +Much of all this is the mere overflow of nervous energy run to waste, +and would cease when the energy was directed to a definite end. Much +is also the result of conscious or unconscious cultivation; as we see +by the almost total disappearance of "hysterics" and fainting fits, +since they have gone out of fashion. Moreover, when people are +brought up, like many women of the higher classes (though less so in +our own country than in any other) a kind of hot-house plants, +shielded from the wholesome vicissitudes of air and temperature, and +untrained in any of the occupations and exercises which give stimulus +and development to the circulatory and muscular system, while their +nervous system, especially in its emotional department, is kept in +unnaturally active play; it is no wonder if those of them who do not +die of consumption, grow up with constitutions liable to derangement +from slight causes, both internal and external, and without stamina +to support any task, physical or mental, requiring continuity of +effort. But women brought up to work for their livelihood show none +of these morbid characteristics, unless indeed they are chained to an +excess of sedentary work in confined and unhealthy rooms. Women who +in their early years have shared in the healthful physical education +and bodily freedom of their brothers, and who obtain a sufficiency of +pure air and exercise in after-life, very rarely have any excessive +susceptibility of nerves which can disqualify them for active +pursuits. There is indeed a certain proportion of persons, in both +sexes, in whom an unusual degree of nervous sensibility is +constitutional, and of so marked a character as to be the feature of +their organization which exercises the greatest influence over the +whole character of the vital phenomena. This constitution, like other +physical conformations, is hereditary, and is transmitted to sons as +well as daughters; but it is possible, and probable, that the nervous +temperament (as it is called) is inherited by a greater number of +women than of men. We will assume this as a fact: and let me then +ask, are men of nervous temperament found to be unfit for the duties +and pursuits usually followed by men? If not, why should women of the +same temperament be unfit for them? The peculiarities of the +temperament are, no doubt, within certain limits, an obstacle to +success in some employments, though an aid to it in others. But when +the occupation is suitable to the temperament, and sometimes even +when it is unsuitable, the most brilliant examples of success are +continually given by the men of high nervous sensibility. They are +distinguished in their practical manifestations chiefly by this, that +being susceptible of a higher degree of excitement than those of +another physical constitution, their powers when excited differ more +than in the case of other people, from those shown in their ordinary +state: they are raised, as it were, above themselves, and do things +with ease which they are wholly incapable of at other times. But this +lofty excitement is not, except in weak bodily constitutions, a mere +flash, which passes away immediately, leaving no permanent traces, +and incompatible with persistent and steady pursuit of an object. It +is the character of the nervous temperament to be capable of +_sustained_ excitement, holding out through long continued efforts. +It is what is meant by _spirit_. It is what makes the high-bred +racehorse run without slackening speed till he drops down dead. It is +what has enabled so many delicate women to maintain the most sublime +constancy not only at the stake, but through a long preliminary +succession of mental and bodily tortures. It is evident that people +of this temperament are particularly apt for what may be called the +executive department of the leadership of mankind. They are the +material of great orators, great preachers, impressive diffusers of +moral influences. Their constitution might be deemed less favourable +to the qualities required from a statesman in the cabinet, or from a +judge. It would be so, if the consequence necessarily followed that +because people are excitable they must always be in a state of +excitement. But this is wholly a question of training. Strong feeling +is the instrument and element of strong self-control: but it requires +to be cultivated in that direction. When it is, it forms not the +heroes of impulse only, but those also of self-conquest. History and +experience prove that the most passionate characters are the most +fanatically rigid in their feelings of duty, when their passion has +been trained to act in that direction. The judge who gives a just +decision in a case where his feelings are intensely interested on the +other side, derives from that same strength of feeling the determined +sense of the obligation of justice, which enables him to achieve this +victory over himself. The capability of that lofty enthusiasm which +takes the human being out of his every-day character, reacts upon the +daily character itself. His aspirations and powers when he is in this +exceptional state, become the type with which he compares, and by +which he estimates, his sentiments and proceedings at other times: +and his habitual purposes assume a character moulded by and +assimilated to the moments of lofty excitement, although those, from +the physical nature of a human being, can only be transient. +Experience of races, as well as of individuals, does not show those +of excitable temperament to be less fit, on the average, either for +speculation or practice, than the more unexcitable. The French, and +the Italians, are undoubtedly by nature more nervously excitable than +the Teutonic races, and, compared at least with the English, they +have a much greater habitual and daily emotional life: but have they +been less great in science, in public business, in legal and judicial +eminence, or in war? There is abundant evidence that the Greeks were +of old, as their descendants and successors still are, one of the +most excitable of the races of mankind. It is superfluous to ask, +what among the achievements of men they did not excel in. The Romans, +probably, as an equally southern people, had the same original +temperament: but the stern character of their national discipline, +like that of the Spartans, made them an example of the opposite type +of national character; the greater strength of their natural feelings +being chiefly apparent in the intensity which the same original +temperament made it possible to give to the artificial. If these +cases exemplify what a naturally excitable people may be made, the +Irish Celts afford one of the aptest examples of what they are when +left to themselves; (if those can be said to be left to themselves +who have been for centuries under the indirect influence of bad +government, and the direct training of a Catholic hierarchy and of a +sincere belief in the Catholic religion.) The Irish character must be +considered, therefore, as an unfavourable case: yet, whenever the +circumstances of the individual have been at all favourable, what +people have shown greater capacity for the most varied and +multifarious individual eminence? Like the French compared with the +English, the Irish with the Swiss, the Greeks or Italians compared +with the German races, so women compared with men may be found, on +the average, to do the same things with some variety in the +particular kind of excellence. But, that they would do them fully as +well on the whole, if their education and cultivation were adapted to +correcting instead of aggravating the infirmities incident to their +temperament, I see not the smallest reason to doubt. + +Supposing it, however, to be true that women's minds are by nature +more mobile than those of men, less capable of persisting long in the +same continuous effort, more fitted for dividing their faculties +among many things than for travelling in any one path to the highest +point which can be reached by it: this may be true of women as they +now are (though not without great and numerous exceptions), and may +account for their having remained behind the highest order of men in +precisely the things in which this absorption of the whole mind in +one set of ideas and occupations may seem to be most requisite. +Still, this difference is one which can only affect the kind of +excellence, not the excellence itself, or its practical worth: and it +remains to be shown whether this exclusive working of a part of the +mind, this absorption of the whole thinking faculty in a single +subject, and concentration of it on a single work, is the normal and +healthful condition of the human faculties, even for speculative +uses. I believe that what is gained in special development by this +concentration, is lost in the capacity of the mind for the other +purposes of life; and even in abstract thought, it is my decided +opinion that the mind does more by frequently returning to a +difficult problem, than by sticking to it without interruption. For +the purposes, at all events, of practice, from its highest to its +humblest departments, the capacity of passing promptly from one +subject of consideration to another, without letting the active +spring of the intellect run down between the two, is a power far more +valuable; and this power women pre-eminently possess, by virtue of +the very mobility of which they are accused. They perhaps have it +from nature, but they certainly have it by training and education; +for nearly the whole of the occupations of women consist in the +management of small but multitudinous details, on each of which the +mind cannot dwell even for a minute, but must pass on to other +things, and if anything requires longer thought, must steal time at +odd moments for thinking of it. The capacity indeed which women show +for doing their thinking in circumstances and at times which almost +any man would make an excuse to himself for not attempting it, has +often been noticed: and a woman's mind, though it may be occupied +only with small things, can hardly ever permit itself to be vacant, +as a man's so often is when not engaged in what he chooses to +consider the business of his life. The business of a woman's ordinary +life is things in general, and can as little cease to go on as the +world to go round. + +But (it is said) there is anatomical evidence of the superior mental +capacity of men compared with women: they have a larger brain. I +reply, that in the first place the fact itself is doubtful. It is by +no means established that the brain of a woman is smaller than that +of a man. If it is inferred merely because a woman's bodily frame +generally is of less dimensions than a man's, this criterion would +lead to strange consequences. A tall and large-boned man must on this +showing be wonderfully superior in intelligence to a small man, and +an elephant or a whale must prodigiously excel mankind. The size of +the brain in human beings, anatomists say, varies much less than the +size of the body, or even of the head, and the one cannot be at all +inferred from the other. It is certain that some women have as large +a brain as any man. It is within my knowledge that a man who had +weighed many human brains, said that the heaviest he knew of, heavier +even than Cuvier's (the heaviest previously recorded,) was that of a +woman. Next, I must observe that the precise relation which exists +between the brain and the intellectual powers is not yet well +understood, but is a subject of great dispute. That there is a very +close relation we cannot doubt. The brain is certainly the material +organ of thought and feeling: and (making abstraction of the great +unsettled controversy respecting the appropriation of different parts +of the brain to different mental faculties) I admit that it would be +an anomaly, and an exception to all we know of the general laws of +life and organization, if the size of the organ were wholly +indifferent to the function; if no accession of power were derived +from the greater magnitude of the instrument. But the exception and +the anomaly would be fully as great if the organ exercised influence +by its magnitude _only_. In all the more delicate operations of +nature--of which those of the animated creation are the most +delicate, and those of the nervous system by far the most delicate of +these--differences in the effect depend as much on differences of +quality in the physical agents, as on their quantity: and if the +quality of an instrument is to be tested by the nicety and delicacy +of the work it can do, the indications point to a greater average +fineness of quality in the brain and nervous system of women than of +men. Dismissing abstract difference of quality, a thing difficult to +verify, the efficiency of an organ is known to depend not solely on +its size but on its activity: and of this we have an approximate +measure in the energy with which the blood circulates through it, +both the stimulus and the reparative force being mainly dependent on +the circulation. It would not be surprising--it is indeed an +hypothesis which accords well with the differences actually observed +between the mental operations of the two sexes--if men on the average +should have the advantage in the size of the brain, and women in +activity of cerebral circulation. The results which conjecture, +founded on analogy, would lead us to expect from this difference of +organization, would correspond to some of those which we most +commonly see. In the first place, the mental operations of men might +be expected to be slower. They would neither be so prompt as women in +thinking, nor so quick to feel. Large bodies take more time to get +into full action. On the other hand, when once got thoroughly into +play, men's brain would bear more work. It would be more persistent +in the line first taken; it would have more difficulty in changing +from one mode of action to another, but, in the one thing it was +doing, it could go on longer without loss of power or sense of +fatigue. And do we not find that the things in which men most excel +women are those which require most plodding and long hammering at a +single thought, while women do best what must be done rapidly? A +woman's brain is sooner fatigued, sooner exhausted; but given the +degree of exhaustion, we should expect to find that it would recover +itself sooner. I repeat that this speculation is entirely +hypothetical; it pretends to no more than to suggest a line of +enquiry. I have before repudiated the notion of its being yet +certainly known that there is any natural difference at all in the +average strength or direction of the mental capacities of the two +sexes, much less what that difference is. Nor is it possible that +this should be known, so long as the psychological laws of the +formation of character have been so little studied, even in a general +way, and in the particular case never scientifically applied at all; +so long as the most obvious external causes of difference of +character are habitually disregarded--left unnoticed by the observer, +and looked down upon with a kind of supercilious contempt by the +prevalent schools both of natural history and of mental philosophy: +who, whether they look for the source of what mainly distinguishes +human beings from one another, in the world of matter or in that of +spirit, agree in running down those who prefer to explain these +differences by the different relations of human beings to society and +life. + +To so ridiculous an extent are the notions formed of the nature of +women, mere empirical generalizations, framed, without philosophy or +analysis, upon the first instances which present themselves, that the +popular idea of it is different in different countries, according as +the opinions and social circumstances of the country have given to +the women living in it any speciality of development or +non-development. An Oriental thinks that women are by nature +peculiarly voluptuous; see the violent abuse of them on this ground +in Hindoo writings. An Englishman usually thinks that they are by +nature cold. The sayings about women's fickleness are mostly of +French origin; from the famous distich of Francis the First, upward +and downward. In England it is a common remark, how much more +constant women are than men. Inconstancy has been longer reckoned +discreditable to a woman, in England than in France; and Englishwomen +are besides, in their inmost nature, much more subdued to opinion. It +may be remarked by the way, that Englishmen are in peculiarly +unfavourable circumstances for attempting to judge what is or is not +natural, not merely to women, but to men, or to human beings +altogether, at least if they have only English experience to go upon: +because there is no place where human nature shows so little of its +original lineaments. Both in a good and a bad sense, the English are +farther from a state of nature than any other modern people. They +are, more than any other people, a product of civilization and +discipline. England is the country in which social discipline has +most succeeded, not so much in conquering, as in suppressing, +whatever is liable to conflict with it. The English, more than any +other people, not only act but feel according to rule. In other +countries, the taught opinion, or the requirement of society, may be +the stronger power, but the promptings of the individual nature are +always visible under it, and often resisting it: rule may be stronger +than nature, but nature is still there. In England, rule has to a +great degree substituted itself for nature. The greater part of life +is carried on, not by following inclination under the control of +rule, but by having no inclination but that of following a rule. Now +this has its good side doubtless, though it has also a wretchedly bad +one; but it must render an Englishman peculiarly ill-qualified to +pass a judgment on the original tendencies of human nature from his +own experience. The errors to which observers elsewhere are liable on +the subject, are of a different character. An Englishman is ignorant +respecting human nature, a Frenchman is prejudiced. An Englishman's +errors are negative, a Frenchman's positive. An Englishman fancies +that things do not exist, because he never sees them; a Frenchman +thinks they must always and necessarily exist, because he does see +them. An Englishman does not know nature, because he has had no +opportunity of observing it; a Frenchman generally knows a great deal +of it, but often mistakes it, because he has only seen it +sophisticated and distorted. For the artificial state superinduced by +society disguises the natural tendencies of the thing which is the +subject of observation, in two different ways: by extinguishing the +nature, or by transforming it. In the one case there is but a starved +residuum of nature remaining to be studied; in the other case there +is much, but it may have expanded in any direction rather than that +in which it would spontaneously grow. + +I have said that it cannot now be known how much of the existing +mental differences between men and women is natural, and how much +artificial; whether there are any natural differences at all; or, +supposing all artificial causes of difference to be withdrawn, what +natural character would be revealed. I am not about to attempt what I +have pronounced impossible: but doubt does not forbid conjecture, and +where certainty is unattainable, there may yet be the means of +arriving at some degree of probability. The first point, the origin +of the differences actually observed, is the one most accessible to +speculation; and I shall attempt to approach it, by the only path by +which it can be reached; by tracing the mental consequences of +external influences. We cannot isolate a human being from the +circumstances of his condition, so as to ascertain experimentally +what he would have been by nature; but we can consider what he is, +and what his circumstances have been, and whether the one would have +been capable of producing the other. + +Let us take, then, the only marked case which observation affords, of +apparent inferiority of women to men, if we except the merely +physical one of bodily strength. No production in philosophy, +science, or art, entitled to the first rank, has been the work of a +woman. Is there any mode of accounting for this, without supposing +that women are naturally incapable of producing them? + +In the first place, we may fairly question whether experience has +afforded sufficient grounds for an induction. It is scarcely three +generations since women, saving very rare exceptions, have begun to +try their capacity in philosophy, science, or art. It is only in the +present generation that their attempts have been at all numerous; and +they are even now extremely few, everywhere but in England and +France. It is a relevant question, whether a mind possessing the +requisites of first-rate eminence in speculation or creative art +could have been expected, on the mere calculation of chances, to turn +up during that lapse of time, among the women whose tastes and +personal position admitted of their devoting themselves to these +pursuits. In all things which there has yet been time for--in all but +the very highest grades in the scale of excellence, especially in the +department in which they have been longest engaged, literature (both +prose and poetry)--women have done quite as much, have obtained fully +as high prizes and as many of them, as could be expected from the +length of time and the number of competitors. If we go back to the +earlier period when very few women made the attempt, yet some of +those few made it with distinguished success. The Greeks always +accounted Sappho among their great poets; and we may well suppose +that Myrtis, said to have been the teacher of Pindar, and Corinna, +who five times bore away from him the prize of poetry, must at least +have had sufficient merit to admit of being compared with that great +name. Aspasia did not leave any philosophical writings; but it is an +admitted fact that Socrates resorted to her for instruction, and +avowed himself to have obtained it. + +If we consider the works of women in modern times, and contrast them +with those of men, either in the literary or the artistic department, +such inferiority as may be observed resolves itself essentially into +one thing: but that is a most material one; deficiency of +originality. Not total deficiency; for every production of mind which +is of any substantive value, has an originality of its own--is a +conception of the mind itself, not a copy of something else. Thoughts +original, in the sense of being unborrowed--of being derived from the +thinker's own observations or intellectual processes--are abundant in +the writings of women. But they have not yet produced any of those +great and luminous new ideas which form an era in thought, nor those +fundamentally new conceptions in art, which open a vista of possible +effects not before thought of, and found a new school. Their +compositions are mostly grounded on the existing fund of thought, and +their creations do not deviate widely from existing types. This is +the sort of inferiority which their works manifest: for in point of +execution, in the detailed application of thought, and the perfection +of style, there is no inferiority. Our best novelists in point of +composition, and of the management of detail, have mostly been women; +and there is not in all modern literature a more eloquent vehicle of +thought than the style of Madame de Stael, nor, as a specimen of +purely artistic excellence, anything superior to the prose of Madame +Sand, whose style acts upon the nervous system like a symphony of +Haydn or Mozart. High originality of conception is, as I have said, +what is chiefly wanting. And now to examine if there is any manner in +which this deficiency can be accounted for. + +Let us remember, then, so far as regards mere thought, that during +all that period in the world's existence, and in the progress of +cultivation, in which great and fruitful new truths could be arrived +at by mere force of genius, with little previous study and +accumulation of knowledge--during all that time women did not concern +themselves with speculation at all. From the days of Hypatia to those +of the Reformation, the illustrious Heloisa is almost the only woman +to whom any such achievement might have been possible; and we know +not how great a capacity of speculation in her may have been lost to +mankind by the misfortunes of her life. Never since any considerable +number of women have begun to cultivate serious thought, has +originality been possible on easy terms. Nearly all the thoughts +which can be reached by mere strength of original faculties, have +long since been arrived at; and originality, in any high sense of the +word, is now scarcely ever attained but by minds which have undergone +elaborate discipline, and are deeply versed in the results of +previous thinking. It is Mr. Maurice, I think, who has remarked on +the present age, that its most original thinkers are those who have +known most thoroughly what had been thought by their predecessors: +and this will always henceforth be the case. Every fresh stone in the +edifice has now to be placed on the top of so many others, that a +long process of climbing, and of carrying up materials, has to be +gone through by whoever aspires to take a share in the present stage +of the work. How many women are there who have gone through any such +process? Mrs. Somerville, alone perhaps of women, knows as much of +mathematics as is now needful for making any considerable +mathematical discovery: is it any proof of inferiority in women, that +she has not happened to be one of the two or three persons who in her +lifetime have associated their names with some striking advancement +of the science? Two women, since political economy has been made a +science, have known enough of it to write usefully on the subject: of +how many of the innumerable men who have written on it during the +same time, is it possible with truth to say more? If no woman has +hitherto been a great historian, what woman has had the necessary +erudition? If no woman is a great philologist, what woman has studied +Sanscrit and Slavonic, the Gothic of Ulphila and the Persic of the +Zendavesta? Even in practical matters we all know what is the value +of the originality of untaught geniuses. It means, inventing over +again in its rudimentary form something already invented and improved +upon by many successive inventors. When women have had the +preparation which all men now require to be eminently original, it +will be time enough to begin judging by experience of their capacity +for originality. + +It no doubt often happens that a person, who has not widely and +accurately studied the thoughts of others on a subject, has by +natural sagacity a happy intuition, which he can suggest, but cannot +prove, which yet when matured may be an important addition to +knowledge: but even then, no justice can be done to it until some +other person, who does possess the previous acquirements, takes it in +hand, tests it, gives it a scientific or practical form, and fits it +into its place among the existing truths of philosophy or science. Is +it supposed that such felicitous thoughts do not occur to women? They +occur by hundreds to every woman of intellect. But they are mostly +lost, for want of a husband or friend who has the other knowledge +which can enable him to estimate them properly and bring them before +the world: and even when they are brought before it, they generally +appear as his ideas, not their real author's. Who can tell how many +of the most original thoughts put forth by male writers, belong to a +woman by suggestion, to themselves only by verifying and working out? +If I may judge by my own case, a very large proportion indeed. + +If we turn from pure speculation to literature in the narrow sense of +the term, and the fine arts, there is a very obvious reason why +women's literature is, in its general conception and in its main +features, an imitation of men's. Why is the Roman literature, as +critics proclaim to satiety, not original, but an imitation of the +Greek? Simply because the Greeks came first. If women lived in a +different country from men, and had never read any of their writings, +they would have had a literature of their own. As it is, they have +not created one, because they found a highly advanced literature +already created. If there had been no suspension of the knowledge of +antiquity, or if the Renaissance had occurred before the Gothic +cathedrals were built, they never would have been built. We see that, +in France and Italy, imitation of the ancient literature stopped the +original development even after it had commenced. All women who write +are pupils of the great male writers. A painter's early pictures, +even if he be a Raffaelle, are undistinguishable in style from those +of his master. Even a Mozart does not display his powerful +originality in his earliest pieces. What years are to a gifted +individual, generations are to a mass. If women's literature is +destined to have a different collective character from that of men, +depending on any difference of natural tendencies, much longer time +is necessary than has yet elapsed, before it can emancipate itself +from the influence of accepted models, and guide itself by its own +impulses. But if, as I believe, there will not prove to be any +natural tendencies common to women, and distinguishing their genius +from that of men, yet every individual writer among them has her +individual tendencies, which at present are still subdued by the +influence of precedent and example: and it will require generations +more, before their individuality is sufficiently developed to make +head against that influence. + +It is in the fine arts, properly so called, that the _prima facie_ +evidence of inferior original powers in women at first sight appears +the strongest: since opinion (it may be said) does not exclude them +from these, but rather encourages them, and their education, instead +of passing over this department, is in the affluent classes mainly +composed of it. Yet in this line of exertion they have fallen still +more short than in many others, of the highest eminence attained by +men. This shortcoming, however, needs no other explanation than the +familiar fact, more universally true in the fine arts than in +anything else; the vast superiority of professional persons over +amateurs. Women in the educated classes are almost universally taught +more or less of some branch or other of the fine arts, but not that +they may gain their living or their social consequence by it. Women +artists are all amateurs. The exceptions are only of the kind which +confirm the general truth. Women are taught music, but not for the +purpose of composing, only of executing it: and accordingly it is +only as composers, that men, in music, are superior to women. The +only one of the fine arts which women do follow, to any extent, as a +profession, and an occupation for life, is the histrionic; and in +that they are confessedly equal, if not superior, to men. To make the +comparison fair, it should be made between the productions of women +in any branch of art, and those of men not following it as a +profession. In musical composition, for example, women surely have +produced fully as good things as have ever been produced by male +amateurs. There are now a few women, a very few, who practise +painting as a profession, and these are already beginning to show +quite as much talent as could be expected. Even male painters (_pace_ +Mr. Ruskin) have not made any very remarkable figure these last +centuries, and it will be long before they do so. The reason why the +old painters were so greatly superior to the modern, is that a +greatly superior class of men applied themselves to the art. In the +fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the Italian painters were the most +accomplished men of their age. The greatest of them were men of +encyclopaedical acquirements and powers, like the great men of Greece. +But in their times fine art was, to men's feelings and conceptions, +among the grandest things in which a human being could excel; and by +it men were made, what only political or military distinction now +makes them, the companions of sovereigns, and the equals of the +highest nobility. In the present age, men of anything like similar +calibre find something more important to do, for their own fame and +the uses of the modern world, than painting: and it is only now and +then that a Reynolds or a Turner (of whose relative rank among +eminent men I do not pretend to an opinion) applies himself to that +art. Music belongs to a different order of things; it does not +require the same general powers of mind, but seems more dependant on +a natural gift: and it may be thought surprising that no one of the +great musical composers has been a woman. But even this natural gift, +to be made available for great creations, requires study, and +professional devotion to the pursuit. The only countries which have +produced first-rate composers, even of the male sex, are Germany and +Italy--countries in which, both in point of special and of general +cultivation, women have remained far behind France and England, being +generally (it may be said without exaggeration) very little educated, +and having scarcely cultivated at all any of the higher faculties of +mind. And in those countries the men who are acquainted with the +principles of musical composition must be counted by hundreds, or +more probably by thousands, the women barely by scores: so that here +again, on the doctrine of averages, we cannot reasonably expect to +see more than one eminent woman to fifty eminent men; and the last +three centuries have not produced fifty eminent male composers either +in Germany or in Italy. + +There are other reasons, besides those which we have now given, that +help to explain why women remain behind men, even in the pursuits +which are open to both. For one thing, very few women have time for +them. This may seem a paradox; it is an undoubted social fact. The +time and thoughts of every woman have to satisfy great previous +demands on them for things practical. There is, first, the +superintendence of the family and the domestic expenditure, which +occupies at least one woman in every family, generally the one of +mature years and acquired experience; unless the family is so rich as +to admit of delegating that task to hired agency, and submitting to +all the waste and malversation inseparable from that mode of +conducting it. The superintendence of a household, even when not in +other respects laborious, is extremely onerous to the thoughts; it +requires incessant vigilance, an eye which no detail escapes, and +presents questions for consideration and solution, foreseen and +unforeseen, at every hour of the day, from which the person +responsible for them can hardly ever shake herself free. If a woman +is of a rank and circumstances which relieve her in a measure from +these cares, she has still devolving on her the management for the +whole family of its intercourse with others--of what is called +society, and the less the call made on her by the former duty, the +greater is always the development of the latter: the dinner parties, +concerts, evening parties, morning visits, letter writing, and all +that goes with them. All this is over and above the engrossing duty +which society imposes exclusively on women, of making themselves +charming. A clever woman of the higher ranks finds nearly a +sufficient employment of her talents in cultivating the graces of +manner and the arts of conversation. To look only at the outward side +of the subject: the great and continual exercise of thought which all +women who attach any value to dressing well (I do not mean +expensively, but with taste, and perception of natural and of +artificial _convenance_) must bestow upon their own dress, perhaps +also upon that of their daughters, would alone go a great way towards +achieving respectable results in art, or science, or literature, and +does actually exhaust much of the time and mental power they might +have to spare for either.[2] If it were possible that all this number +of little practical interests (which are made great to them) should +leave them either much leisure, or much energy and freedom of mind, +to be devoted to art or speculation, they must have a much greater +original supply of active faculty than the vast majority of men. But +this is not all. Independently of the regular offices of life which +devolve upon a woman, she is expected to have her time and faculties +always at the disposal of everybody. If a man has not a profession to +exempt him from such demands, still, if he has a pursuit, he offends +nobody by devoting his time to it; occupation is received as a valid +excuse for his not answering to every casual demand which may be made +on him. Are a woman's occupations, especially her chosen and +voluntary ones, ever regarded as excusing her from any of what are +termed the calls of society? Scarcely are her most necessary and +recognised duties allowed as an exemption. It requires an illness in +the family, or something else out of the common way, to entitle her +to give her own business the precedence over other people's +amusement. She must always be at the beck and call of somebody, +generally of everybody. If she has a study or a pursuit, she must +snatch any short interval which accidentally occurs to be employed in +it. A celebrated woman, in a work which I hope will some day be +published, remarks truly that everything a woman does is done at odd +times. Is it wonderful, then, if she does not attain the highest +eminence in things which require consecutive attention, and the +concentration on them of the chief interest of life? Such is +philosophy, and such, above all, is art, in which, besides the +devotion of the thoughts and feelings, the hand also must be kept in +constant exercise to attain high skill. + +There is another consideration to be added to all these. In the +various arts and intellectual occupations, there is a degree of +proficiency sufficient for living by it, and there is a higher degree +on which depend the great productions which immortalize a name. To +the attainment of the former, there are adequate motives in the case +of all who follow the pursuit professionally: the other is hardly +ever attained where there is not, or where there has not been at some +period of life, an ardent desire of celebrity. Nothing less is +commonly a sufficient stimulus to undergo the long and patient +drudgery, which, in the case even of the greatest natural gifts, is +absolutely required for great eminence in pursuits in which we +already possess so many splendid memorials of the highest genius. +Now, whether the cause be natural or artificial, women seldom have +this eagerness for fame. Their ambition is generally confined within +narrower bounds. The influence they seek is over those who +immediately surround them. Their desire is to be liked, loved, or +admired, by those whom they see with their eyes: and the proficiency +in knowledge, arts, and accomplishments, which is sufficient for +that, almost always contents them. This is a trait of character which +cannot be left out of the account in judging of women as they are. I +do not at all believe that it is inherent in women. It is only the +natural result of their circumstances. The love of fame in men is +encouraged by education and opinion: to "scorn delights and live +laborious days" for its sake, is accounted the part of "noble minds," +even if spoken of as their "last infirmity," and is stimulated by the +access which fame gives to all objects of ambition, including even +the favour of women; while to women themselves all these objects are +closed, and the desire of fame itself considered daring and +unfeminine. Besides, how could it be that a woman's interests should +not be all concentrated upon the impressions made on those who come +into her daily life, when society has ordained that all her duties +should be to them, and has contrived that all her comforts should +depend on them? The natural desire of consideration from our fellow +creatures is as strong in a woman as in a man; but society has so +ordered things that public consideration is, in all ordinary cases, +only attainable by her through the consideration of her husband or of +her male relations, while her private consideration is forfeited by +making herself individually prominent, or appearing in any other +character than that of an appendage to men. Whoever is in the least +capable of estimating the influence on the mind of the entire +domestic and social position and the whole habit of a life, must +easily recognise in that influence a complete explanation of nearly +all the apparent differences between women and men, including the +whole of those which imply any inferiority. + +As for moral differences, considered as distinguished from +intellectual, the distinction commonly drawn is to the advantage of +women. They are declared to be better than men; an empty compliment, +which must provoke a bitter smile from every woman of spirit, since +there is no other situation in life in which it is the established +order, and considered quite natural and suitable, that the better +should obey the worse. If this piece of idle talk is good for +anything, it is only as an admission by men, of the corrupting +influence of power; for that is certainly the only truth which the +fact, if it be a fact, either proves or illustrates. And it _is_ true +that servitude, except when it actually brutalizes, though corrupting +to both, is less so to the slaves than to the slave-masters. It is +wholesomer for the moral nature to be restrained, even by arbitrary +power, than to be allowed to exercise arbitrary power without +restraint. Women, it is said, seldomer fall under the penal +law--contribute a much smaller number of offenders to the criminal +calendar, than men. I doubt not that the same thing may be said, with +the same truth, of negro slaves. Those who are under the control of +others cannot often commit crimes, unless at the command and for the +purposes of their masters. I do not know a more signal instance of +the blindness with which the world, including the herd of studious +men, ignore and pass over all the influences of social circumstances, +than their silly depreciation of the intellectual, and silly +panegyrics on the moral, nature of women. + +The complimentary dictum about women's superior moral goodness may be +allowed to pair off with the disparaging one respecting their greater +liability to moral bias. Women, we are told, are not capable of +resisting their personal partialities: their judgment in grave +affairs is warped by their sympathies and antipathies. Assuming it to +be so, it is still to be proved that women are oftener misled by +their personal feelings than men by their personal interests. The +chief difference would seem in that case to be, that men are led from +the course of duty and the public interest by their regard for +themselves, women (not being allowed to have private interests of +their own) by their regard for somebody else. It is also to be +considered, that all the education which women receive from society +inculcates on them the feeling that the individuals connected with +them are the only ones to whom they owe any duty--the only ones whose +interest they are called upon to care for; while, as far as education +is concerned, they are left strangers even to the elementary ideas +which are presupposed in any intelligent regard for larger interests +or higher moral objects. The complaint against them resolves itself +merely into this, that they fulfil only too faithfully the sole duty +which they are taught, and almost the only one which they are +permitted to practise. + +The concessions of the privileged to the unprivileged are so seldom +brought about by any better motive than the power of the unprivileged +to extort them, that any arguments against the prerogative of sex are +likely to be little attended to by the generality, as long as they +are able to say to themselves that women do not complain of it. That +fact certainly enables men to retain the unjust privilege some time +longer; but does not render it less unjust. Exactly the same thing +may be said of the women in the harem of an Oriental: they do not +complain of not being allowed the freedom of European women. They +think our women insufferably bold and unfeminine. How rarely it is +that even men complain of the general order of society; and how much +rarer still would such complaint be, if they did not know of any +different order existing anywhere else. Women do not complain of the +general lot of women; or rather they do, for plaintive elegies on it +are very common in the writings of women, and were still more so as +long as the lamentations could not be suspected of having any +practical object. Their complaints are like the complaints which men +make of the general unsatisfactoriness of human life; they are not +meant to imply blame, or to plead for any change. But though women do +not complain of the power of husbands, each complains of her own +husband, or of the husbands of her friends. It is the same in all +other cases of servitude, at least in the commencement of the +emancipatory movement. The serfs did not at first complain of the +power of their lords, but only of their tyranny. The Commons began by +claiming a few municipal privileges; they next asked an exemption for +themselves from being taxed without their own consent; but they would +at that time have thought it a great presumption to claim any share +in the king's sovereign authority. The case of women is now the only +case in which to rebel against established rules is still looked upon +with the same eyes as was formerly a subject's claim to the right of +rebelling against his king. A woman who joins in any movement which +her husband disapproves, makes herself a martyr, without even being +able to be an apostle, for the husband can legally put a stop to her +apostleship. Women cannot be expected to devote themselves to the +emancipation of women, until men in considerable number are prepared +to join with them in the undertaking. + +[Footnote 1: Especially is this true if we take into consideration +Asia as well as Europe. If a Hindoo principality is strongly, +vigilantly, and economically governed; if order is preserved without +oppression; if cultivation is extending, and the people prosperous, +in three cases out of four that principality is under a woman's rule. +This fact, to me an entirely unexpected one, I have collected from a +long official knowledge of Hindoo governments. There are many such +instances: for though, by Hindoo institutions, a woman cannot reign, +she is the legal regent of a kingdom during the minority of the heir; +and minorities are frequent, the lives of the male rulers being so +often prematurely terminated through the effect of inactivity and +sensual excesses. When we consider that these princesses have never +been seen in public, have never conversed with any man not of their +own family except from behind a curtain, that they do not read, and +if they did, there is no book in their languages which can give them +the smallest instruction on political affairs; the example they +afford of the natural capacity of women for government is very +striking.] + +[Footnote 2: "It appears to be the same right turn of mind which +enables a man to acquire the _truth_, or the just idea of what is +right, in the ornaments, as in the more stable principles of art. It +has still the same centre of perfection, though it is the centre of a +smaller circle.--To illustrate this by the fashion of dress, in which +there is allowed to be a good or bad taste. The component parts of +dress are continually changing from great to little, from short to +long; but the general form still remains: it is still the same +general dress which is comparatively fixed, though on a very slender +foundation; but it is on this which fashion must rest. He who invents +with the most success, or dresses in the best taste, would probably, +from the same sagacity employed to greater purposes, have discovered +equal skill, or have formed the same correct taste, in the highest +labours of art."--_Sir Joshua Reynolds' Discourses_, Disc. vii.] + + + + +CHAPTER IV. + + +There remains a question, not of less importance than those already +discussed, and which will be asked the most importunately by those +opponents whose conviction is somewhat shaken on the main point. What +good are we to expect from the changes proposed in our customs and +institutions? Would mankind be at all better off if women were free? +If not, why disturb their minds, and attempt to make a social +revolution in the name of an abstract right? + +It is hardly to be expected that this question will be asked in +respect to the change proposed in the condition of women in marriage. +The sufferings, immoralities, evils of all sorts, produced in +innumerable cases by the subjection of individual women to individual +men, are far too terrible to be overlooked. Unthinking or uncandid +persons, counting those cases alone which are extreme, or which +attain publicity, may say that the evils are exceptional; but no one +can be blind to their existence, nor, in many cases, to their +intensity. And it is perfectly obvious that the abuse of the power +cannot be very much checked while the power remains. It is a power +given, or offered, not to good men, or to decently respectable men, +but to all men; the most brutal, and the most criminal. There is no +check but that of opinion, and such men are in general within the +reach of no opinion but that of men like themselves. If such men did +not brutally tyrannize over the one human being whom the law compels +to bear everything from them, society must already have reached a +paradisiacal state. There could be no need any longer of laws to curb +men's vicious propensities. Astraea must not only have returned to +earth, but the heart of the worst man must have become her temple. +The law of servitude in marriage is a monstrous contradiction to all +the principles of the modern world, and to all the experience through +which those principles have been slowly and painfully worked out. It +is the sole case, now that negro slavery has been abolished, in which +a human being in the plenitude of every faculty is delivered up to +the tender mercies of another human being, in the hope forsooth that +this other will use the power solely for the good of the person +subjected to it. Marriage is the only actual bondage known to our +law. There remain no legal slaves, except the mistress of every +house. + +It is not, therefore, on this part of the subject, that the question +is likely to be asked, _Cui bono_? We may be told that the evil would +outweigh the good, but the reality of the good admits of no dispute. +In regard, however, to the larger question, the removal of women's +disabilities--their recognition as the equals of men in all that +belongs to citizenship--the opening to them of all honourable +employments, and of the training and education which qualifies for +those employments--there are many persons for whom it is not enough +that the inequality has no just or legitimate defence; they require +to be told what express advantage would be obtained by abolishing it. + +To which let me first answer, the advantage of having the most +universal and pervading of all human relations regulated by justice +instead of injustice. The vast amount of this gain to human nature, +it is hardly possible, by any explanation or illustration, to place +in a stronger light than it is placed by the bare statement, to any +one who attaches a moral meaning to words. All the selfish +propensities, the self-worship, the unjust self-preference, which +exist among mankind, have their source and root in, and derive their +principal nourishment from, the present constitution of the relation +between men and women. Think what it is to a boy, to grow up to +manhood in the belief that without any merit or any exertion of his +own, though he may be the most frivolous and empty or the most +ignorant and stolid of mankind, by the mere fact of being born a male +he is by right the superior of all and every one of an entire half of +the human race: including probably some whose real superiority to +himself he has daily or hourly occasion to feel; but even if in his +whole conduct he habitually follows a woman's guidance, still, if he +is a fool, she thinks that of course she is not, and cannot be, equal +in ability and judgment to himself; and if he is not a fool, he does +worse--he sees that she is superior to him, and believes that, +notwithstanding her superiority, he is entitled to command and she is +bound to obey. What must be the effect on his character, of this +lesson? And men of the cultivated classes are often not aware how +deeply it sinks into the immense majority of male minds. For, among +right-feeling and well-bred people, the inequality is kept as much as +possible out of sight; above all, out of sight of the children. As +much obedience is required from boys to their mother as to their +father: they are not permitted to domineer over their sisters, nor +are they accustomed to see these postponed to them, but the contrary; +the compensations of the chivalrous feeling being made prominent, +while the servitude which requires them is kept in the background. +Well brought-up youths in the higher classes thus often escape the +bad influences of the situation in their early years, and only +experience them when, arrived at manhood, they fall under the +dominion of facts as they really exist. Such people are little aware, +when a boy is differently brought up, how early the notion of his +inherent superiority to a girl arises in his mind; how it grows with +his growth and strengthens with his strength; how it is inoculated by +one schoolboy upon another; how early the youth thinks himself +superior to his mother, owing her perhaps forbearance, but no real +respect; and how sublime and sultan-like a sense of superiority he +feels, above all, over the woman whom he honours by admitting her to +a partnership of his life. Is it imagined that all this does not +pervert the whole manner of existence of the man, both as an +individual and as a social being? It is an exact parallel to the +feeling of a hereditary king that he is excellent above others by +being born a king, or a noble by being born a noble. The relation +between husband and wife is very like that between lord and vassal, +except that the wife is held to more unlimited obedience than the +vassal was. However the vassal's character may have been affected, +for better and for worse, by his subordination, who can help seeing +that the lord's was affected greatly for the worse? whether he was +led to believe that his vassals were really superior to himself, or +to feel that he was placed in command over people as good as himself, +for no merits or labours of his own, but merely for having, as Figaro +says, taken the trouble to be born. The self-worship of the monarch, +or of the feudal superior, is matched by the self-worship of the +male. Human beings do not grow up from childhood in the possession of +unearned distinctions, without pluming themselves upon them. Those +whom privileges not acquired by their merit, and which they feel to +be disproportioned to it, inspire with additional humility, are +always the few, and the best few. The rest are only inspired with +pride, and the worst sort of pride, that which values itself upon +accidental advantages, not of its own achieving. Above all, when the +feeling of being raised above the whole of the other sex is combined +with personal authority over one individual among them; the +situation, if a school of conscientious and affectionate forbearance +to those whose strongest points of character are conscience and +affection, is to men of another quality a regularly constituted +Academy or Gymnasium for training them in arrogance and +overbearingness; which vices, if curbed by the certainty of +resistance in their intercourse with other men, their equals, break +out towards all who are in a position to be obliged to tolerate them, +and often revenge themselves upon the unfortunate wife for the +involuntary restraint which they are obliged to submit to elsewhere. + +The example afforded, and the education given to the sentiments, by +laying the foundation of domestic existence upon a relation +contradictory to the first principles of social justice, must, from +the very nature of man, have a perverting influence of such +magnitude, that it is hardly possible with our present experience to +raise our imaginations to the conception of so great a change for the +better as would be made by its removal. All that education and +civilization are doing to efface the influences on character of the +law of force, and replace them by those of justice, remains merely on +the surface, as long as the citadel of the enemy is not attacked. The +principle of the modern movement in morals and politics, is that +conduct, and conduct alone, entitles to respect: that not what men +are, but what they do, constitutes their claim to deference; that, +above all, merit, and not birth, is the only rightful claim to power +and authority. If no authority, not in its nature temporary, were +allowed to one human being over another, society would not be +employed in building up propensities with one hand which it has to +curb with the other. The child would really, for the first time in +man's existence on earth, be trained in the way he should go, and +when he was old there would be a chance that he would not depart from +it. But so long as the right of the strong to power over the weak +rules in the very heart of society, the attempt to make the equal +right of the weak the principle of its outward actions will always be +an uphill struggle; for the law of justice, which is also that of +Christianity, will never get possession of men's inmost sentiments; +they will be working against it, even when bending to it. + +The second benefit to be expected from giving to women the free use +of their faculties, by leaving them the free choice of their +employments, and opening to them the same field of occupation and the +same prizes and encouragements as to other human beings, would be +that of doubling the mass of mental faculties available for the +higher service of humanity. Where there is now one person qualified +to benefit mankind and promote the general improvement, as a public +teacher, or an administrator of some branch of public or social +affairs, there would then be a chance of two. Mental superiority of +any kind is at present everywhere so much below the demand; there is +such a deficiency of persons competent to do excellently anything +which it requires any considerable amount of ability to do; that the +loss to the world, by refusing to make use of one-half of the whole +quantity of talent it possesses, is extremely serious. It is true +that this amount of mental power is not totally lost. Much of it is +employed, and would in any case be employed, in domestic management, +and in the few other occupations open to women; and from the +remainder indirect benefit is in many individual cases obtained, +through the personal influence of individual women over individual +men. But these benefits are partial; their range is extremely +circumscribed; and if they must be admitted, on the one hand, as a +deduction from the amount of fresh social power that would be +acquired by giving freedom to one-half of the whole sum of human +intellect, there must be added, on the other, the benefit of the +stimulus that would be given to the intellect of men by the +competition; or (to use a more true expression) by the necessity that +would be imposed on them of deserving precedency before they could +expect to obtain it. + +This great accession to the intellectual power of the species, and to +the amount of intellect available for the good management of its +affairs, would be obtained, partly, through the better and more +complete intellectual education of women, which would then improve +_pari passu_ with that of men. Women in general would be brought up +equally capable of understanding business, public affairs, and the +higher matters of speculation, with men in the same class of society; +and the select few of the one as well as of the other sex, who were +qualified not only to comprehend what is done or thought by others, +but to think or do something considerable themselves, would meet with +the same facilities for improving and training their capacities in +the one sex as in the other. In this way, the widening of the sphere +of action for women would operate for good, by raising their +education to the level of that of men, and making the one participate +in all improvements made in the other. But independently of this, the +mere breaking down of the barrier would of itself have an educational +virtue of the highest worth. The mere getting rid of the idea that +all the wider subjects of thought and action, all the things which +are of general and not solely of private interest, are men's +business, from which women are to be warned off--positively +interdicted from most of it, coldly tolerated in the little which is +allowed them--the mere consciousness a woman would then have of being +a human being like any other, entitled to choose her pursuits, urged +or invited by the same inducements as any one else to interest +herself in whatever is interesting to human beings, entitled to exert +the share of influence on all human concerns which belongs to an +individual opinion, whether she attempted actual participation in +them or not--this alone would effect an immense expansion of the +faculties of women, as well as enlargement of the range of their +moral sentiments. + +Besides the addition to the amount of individual talent available for +the conduct of human affairs, which certainly are not at present so +abundantly provided in that respect that they can afford to dispense +with one-half of what nature proffers; the opinion of women would +then possess a more beneficial, rather than a greater, influence upon +the general mass of human belief and sentiment. I say a more +beneficial, rather than a greater influence; for the influence of +women over the general tone of opinion has always, or at least from +the earliest known period, been very considerable. The influence of +mothers on the early character of their sons, and the desire of young +men to recommend themselves to young women, have in all recorded +times been important agencies in the formation of character, and have +determined some of the chief steps in the progress of civilization. +Even in the Homeric age, [Greek: aidos] towards the [Greek: Troadas] +[Greek: helkesipeplous] is an acknowledged and powerful motive of +action in the great Hector. The moral influence of women has had two +modes of operation. First, it has been a softening influence. Those +who were most liable to be the victims of violence, have naturally +tended as much as they could towards limiting its sphere and +mitigating its excesses. Those who were not taught to fight, have +naturally inclined in favour of any other mode of settling +differences rather than that of fighting. In general, those who have +been the greatest sufferers by the indulgence of selfish passion, +have been the most earnest supporters of any moral law which offered +a means of bridling passion. Women were powerfully instrumental in +inducing the northern conquerors to adopt the creed of Christianity, +a creed so much more favourable to women than any that preceded it. +The conversion of the Anglo-Saxons and of the Franks may be said to +have been begun by the wives of Ethelbert and Clovis. The other mode +in which the effect of women's opinion has been conspicuous, is by +giving a powerful stimulus to those qualities in men, which, not +being themselves trained in, it was necessary for them that they +should find in their protectors. Courage, and the military virtues +generally, have at all times been greatly indebted to the desire +which men felt of being admired by women: and the stimulus reaches +far beyond this one class of eminent qualities, since, by a very +natural effect of their position, the best passport to the admiration +and favour of women has always been to be thought highly of by men. +From the combination of the two kinds of moral influence thus +exercised by women, arose the spirit of chivalry: the peculiarity of +which is, to aim at combining the highest standard of the warlike +qualities with the cultivation of a totally different class of +virtues--those of gentleness, generosity, and self-abnegation, +towards the non-military and defenceless classes generally, and a +special submission and worship directed towards women; who were +distinguished from the other defenceless classes by the high rewards +which they had it in their power voluntarily to bestow on those who +endeavoured to earn their favour, instead of extorting their +subjection. Though the practice of chivalry fell even more sadly +short of its theoretic standard than practice generally falls below +theory, it remains one of the most precious monuments of the moral +history of our race; as a remarkable instance of a concerted and +organized attempt by a most disorganized and distracted society, to +raise up and carry into practice a moral ideal greatly in advance of +its social condition and institutions; so much so as to have been +completely frustrated in the main object, yet never entirely +inefficacious, and which has left a most sensible, and for the most +part a highly valuable impress on the ideas and feelings of all +subsequent times. + +The chivalrous ideal is the acme of the influence of women's +sentiments on the moral cultivation of mankind: and if women are to +remain in their subordinate situation, it were greatly to be lamented +that the chivalrous standard should have passed away, for it is the +only one at all capable of mitigating the demoralizing influences of +that position. But the changes in the general state of the species +rendered inevitable the substitution of a totally different ideal of +morality for the chivalrous one. Chivalry was the attempt to infuse +moral elements into a state of society in which everything depended +for good or evil on individual prowess, under the softening +influences of individual delicacy and generosity. In modern +societies, all things, even in the military department of affairs, +are decided, not by individual effort, but by the combined operations +of numbers; while the main occupation of society has changed from +fighting to business, from military to industrial life. The +exigencies of the new life are no more exclusive of the virtues of +generosity than those of the old, but it no longer entirely depends +on them. The main foundations of the moral life of modern times must +be justice and prudence; the respect of each for the rights of every +other, and the ability of each to take care of himself. Chivalry left +without legal check all forms of wrong which reigned unpunished +throughout society; it only encouraged a few to do right in +preference to wrong, by the direction it gave to the instruments of +praise and admiration. But the real dependence of morality must +always be upon its penal sanctions--its power to deter from evil. The +security of society cannot rest on merely rendering honour to right, +a motive so comparatively weak in all but a few, and which on very +many does not operate at all. Modern society is able to repress wrong +through all departments of life, by a fit exertion of the superior +strength which civilization has given it, and thus to render the +existence of the weaker members of society (no longer defenceless but +protected by law) tolerable to them, without reliance on the +chivalrous feelings of those who are in a position to tyrannize. The +beauties and graces of the chivalrous character are still what they +were, but the rights of the weak, and the general comfort of human +life, now rest on a far surer and steadier support; or rather, they +do so in every relation of life except the conjugal. + +At present the moral influence of women is no less real, but it is no +longer of so marked and definite a character: it has more nearly +merged in the general influence of public opinion. Both through the +contagion of sympathy, and through the desire of men to shine in the +eyes of women, their feelings have great effect in keeping alive what +remains of the chivalrous ideal--in fostering the sentiments and +continuing the traditions of spirit and generosity. In these points +of character, their standard is higher than that of men; in the +quality of justice, somewhat lower. As regards the relations of +private life it may be said generally, that their influence is, on +the whole, encouraging to the softer virtues, discouraging to the +sterner: though the statement must be taken with all the +modifications dependent on individual character. In the chief of the +greater trials to which virtue is subject in the concerns of +life--the conflict between interest and principle--the tendency of +women's influence is of a very mixed character. When the principle +involved happens to be one of the very few which the course of their +religious or moral education has strongly impressed upon themselves, +they are potent auxiliaries to virtue: and their husbands and sons +are often prompted by them to acts of abnegation which they never +would have been capable of without that stimulus. But, with the +present education and position of women, the moral principles which +have been impressed on them cover but a comparatively small part of +the field of virtue, and are, moreover, principally negative; +forbidding particular acts, but having little to do with the general +direction of the thoughts and purposes. I am afraid it must be said, +that disinterestedness in the general conduct of life--the devotion +of the energies to purposes which hold out no promise of private +advantages to the family--is very seldom encouraged or supported by +women's influence. It is small blame to them that they discourage +objects of which they have not learnt to see the advantage, and which +withdraw their men from them, and from the interests of the family. +But the consequence is that women's influence is often anything but +favourable to public virtue. + +Women have, however, some share of influence in giving the tone to +public moralities since their sphere of action has been a little +widened, and since a considerable number of them have occupied +themselves practically in the promotion of objects reaching beyond +their own family and household. The influence of women counts for a +great deal in two of the most marked features of modern European +life--its aversion to war, and its addiction to philanthropy. +Excellent characteristics both; but unhappily, if the influence of +women is valuable in the encouragement it gives to these feelings in +general, in the particular applications the direction it gives to +them is at least as often mischievous as useful. In the philanthropic +department more particularly, the two provinces chiefly cultivated by +women are religious proselytism and charity. Religious proselytism at +home, is but another word for embittering of religious animosities: +abroad, it is usually a blind running at an object, without either +knowing or heeding the fatal mischiefs--fatal to the religious object +itself as well as to all other desirable objects--which may be +produced by the means employed. As for charity, it is a matter in +which the immediate effect on the persons directly concerned, and the +ultimate consequence to the general good, are apt to be at complete +war with one another: while the education given to women--an +education of the sentiments rather than of the understanding--and the +habit inculcated by their whole life, of looking to immediate effects +on persons, and not to remote effects on classes of persons--make +them both unable to see, and unwilling to admit, the ultimate evil +tendency of any form of charity or philanthropy which commends itself +to their sympathetic feelings. The great and continually increasing +mass of unenlightened and shortsighted benevolence, which, taking the +care of people's lives out of their own hands, and relieving them +from the disagreeable consequences of their own acts, saps the very +foundations of the self-respect, self-help, and self-control which +are the essential conditions both of individual prosperity and of +social virtue--this waste of resources and of benevolent feelings in +doing harm instead of good, is immensely swelled by women's +contributions, and stimulated by their influence. Not that this is a +mistake likely to be made by women, where they have actually the +practical management of schemes of beneficence. It sometimes happens +that women who administer public charities--with that insight into +present fact, and especially into the minds and feelings of those +with whom they are in immediate contact, in which women generally +excel men--recognise in the clearest manner the demoralizing +influence of the alms given or the help afforded, and could give +lessons on the subject to many a male political economist. But women +who only give their money, and are not brought face to face with the +effects it produces, how can they be expected to foresee them? A +woman born to the present lot of women, and content with it, how +should she appreciate the value of self-dependence? She is not +self-dependent; she is not taught self-dependence; her destiny is to +receive everything from others, and why should what is good enough +for her be bad for the poor? Her familiar notions of good are of +blessings descending from a superior. She forgets that she is not +free, and that the poor are; that if what they need is given to them +unearned, they cannot be compelled to earn it: that everybody cannot +be taken care of by everybody, but there must be some motive to +induce people to take care of themselves; and that to be helped to +help themselves, if they are physically capable of it, is the only +charity which proves to be charity in the end. + +These considerations show how usefully the part which women take in +the formation of general opinion, would be modified for the better by +that more enlarged instruction, and practical conversancy with the +things which their opinions influence, that would necessarily arise +from their social and political emancipation. But the improvement it +would work through the influence they exercise, each in her own +family, would be still more remarkable. + +It is often said that in the classes most exposed to temptation, a +man's wife and children tend to keep him honest and respectable, both +by the wife's direct influence, and by the concern he feels for their +future welfare. This may be so, and no doubt often is so, with those +who are more weak than wicked; and this beneficial influence would be +preserved and strengthened under equal laws; it does not depend on +the woman's servitude, but is, on the contrary, diminished by the +disrespect which the inferior class of men always at heart feel +towards those who are subject to their power. But when we ascend +higher in the scale, we come among a totally different set of moving +forces. The wife's influence tends, as far as it goes, to prevent the +husband from falling below the common standard of approbation of the +country. It tends quite as strongly to hinder him from rising above +it. The wife is the auxiliary of the common public opinion. A man who +is married to a woman his inferior in intelligence, finds her a +perpetual dead weight, or, worse than a dead weight, a drag, upon +every aspiration of his to be better than public opinion requires him +to be. It is hardly possible for one who is in these bonds, to attain +exalted virtue. If he differs in his opinion from the mass--if he +sees truths which have not yet dawned upon them, or if, feeling in +his heart truths which they nominally recognise, he would like to act +up to those truths more conscientiously than the generality of +mankind--to all such thoughts and desires, marriage is the heaviest +of drawbacks, unless he be so fortunate as to have a wife as much +above the common level as he himself is. + +For, in the first place, there is always some sacrifice of personal +interest required; either of social consequence, or of pecuniary +means; perhaps the risk of even the means of subsistence. These +sacrifices and risks he may be willing to encounter for himself; but +he will pause before he imposes them on his family. And his family in +this case means his wife and daughters; for he always hopes that his +sons will feel as he feels himself, and that what he can do without, +they will do without, willingly, in the same cause. But his +daughters--their marriage may depend upon it: and his wife, who is +unable to enter into or understand the objects for which these +sacrifices are made--who, if she thought them worth any sacrifice, +would think so on trust, and solely for his sake--who can participate +in none of the enthusiasm or the self-approbation he himself may +feel, while the things which he is disposed to sacrifice are all in +all to her; will not the best and most unselfish man hesitate the +longest before bringing on her this consequence? If it be not the +comforts of life, but only social consideration, that is at stake, +the burthen upon his conscience and feelings is still very severe. +Whoever has a wife and children has given hostages to Mrs. Grundy. +The approbation of that potentate may be a matter of indifference to +him, but it is of great importance to his wife. The man himself may +be above opinion, or may find sufficient compensation in the opinion +of those of his own way of thinking. But to the women connected with +him, he can offer no compensation. The almost invariable tendency of +the wife to place her influence in the same scale with social +consideration, is sometimes made a reproach to women, and represented +as a peculiar trait of feebleness and childishness of character in +them: surely with great injustice. Society makes the whole life of a +woman, in the easy classes, a continued self-sacrifice; it exacts +from her an unremitting restraint of the whole of her natural +inclinations, and the sole return it makes to her for what often +deserves the name of a martyrdom, is consideration. Her consideration +is inseparably connected with that of her husband, and after paying +the full price for it, she finds that she is to lose it, for no +reason of which she can feel the cogency. She has sacrificed her +whole life to it, and her husband will not sacrifice to it a whim, a +freak, an eccentricity; something not recognised or allowed for by +the world, and which the world will agree with her in thinking a +folly, if it thinks no worse! The dilemma is hardest upon that very +meritorious class of men, who, without possessing talents which +qualify them to make a figure among those with whom they agree in +opinion, hold their opinion from conviction, and feel bound in honour +and conscience to serve it, by making profession of their belief, and +giving their time, labour, and means, to anything undertaken in its +behalf. The worst case of all is when such men happen to be of a rank +and position which of itself neither gives them, nor excludes them +from, what is considered the best society; when their admission to it +depends mainly on what is thought of them personally--and however +unexceptionable their breeding and habits, their being identified +with opinions and public conduct unacceptable to those who give the +tone to society would operate as an effectual exclusion. Many a woman +flatters herself (nine times out of ten quite erroneously) that +nothing prevents her and her husband from moving in the highest +society of her neighbourhood--society in which others well known to +her, and in the same class of life, mix freely--except that her +husband is unfortunately a Dissenter, or has the reputation of +mingling in low radical politics. That it is, she thinks, which +hinders George from getting a commission or a place, Caroline from +making an advantageous match, and prevents her and her husband from +obtaining invitations, perhaps honours, which, for aught she sees, +they are as well entitled to as some folks. With such an influence in +every house, either exerted actively, or operating all the more +powerfully for not being asserted, is it any wonder that people in +general are kept down in that mediocrity of respectability which is +becoming a marked characteristic of modern times? + +There is another very injurious aspect in which the effect, not of +women's disabilities directly, but of the broad line of difference +which those disabilities create between the education and character +of a woman and that of a man, requires to be considered. Nothing can +be more unfavourable to that union of thoughts and inclinations which +is the ideal of married life. Intimate society between people +radically dissimilar to one another, is an idle dream. Unlikeness may +attract, but it is likeness which retains; and in proportion to the +likeness is the suitability of the individuals to give each other a +happy life. While women are so unlike men, it is not wonderful that +selfish men should feel the need of arbitrary power in their own +hands, to arrest _in limine_ the life-long conflict of inclinations, +by deciding every question on the side of their own preference. When +people are extremely unlike, there can be no real identity of +interest. Very often there is conscientious difference of opinion +between married people, on the highest points of duty. Is there any +reality in the marriage union where this takes place? Yet it is not +uncommon anywhere, when the woman has any earnestness of character; +and it is a very general case indeed in Catholic countries, when she +is supported in her dissent by the only other authority to which she +is taught to bow, the priest. With the usual barefacedness of power +not accustomed to find itself disputed, the influence of priests over +women is attacked by Protestant and Liberal writers, less for being +bad in itself, than because it is a rival authority to the husband, +and raises up a revolt against his infallibility. In England, similar +differences occasionally exist when an Evangelical wife has allied +herself with a husband of a different quality; but in general this +source at least of dissension is got rid of, by reducing the minds of +women to such a nullity, that they have no opinions but those of Mrs. +Grundy, or those which the husband tells them to have. When there is +no difference of opinion, differences merely of taste may be +sufficient to detract greatly from the happiness of married life. And +though it may stimulate the amatory propensities of men, it does not +conduce to married happiness, to exaggerate by differences of +education whatever may be the native differences of the sexes. If the +married pair are well-bred and well-behaved people, they tolerate +each other's tastes; but is mutual toleration what people look +forward to, when they enter into marriage? These differences of +inclination will naturally make their wishes different, if not +restrained by affection or duty, as to almost all domestic questions +which arise. What a difference there must be in the society which the +two persons will wish to frequent, or be frequented by! Each will +desire associates who share their own tastes: the persons agreeable +to one, will be indifferent or positively disagreeable to the other; +yet there can be none who are not common to both, for married people +do not now live in different parts of the house and have totally +different visiting lists, as in the reign of Louis XV. They cannot +help having different wishes as to the bringing up of the children: +each will wish to see reproduced in them their own tastes and +sentiments: and there is either a compromise, and only a +half-satisfaction to either, or the wife has to yield--often with +bitter suffering; and, with or without intention, her occult +influence continues to counterwork the husband's purposes. + +It would of course be extreme folly to suppose that these differences +of feeling and inclination only exist because women are brought up +differently from men, and that there would not be differences of +taste under any imaginable circumstances. But there is nothing beyond +the mark in saying that the distinction in bringing-up immensely +aggravates those differences, and renders them wholly inevitable. +While women are brought up as they are, a man and a woman will but +rarely find in one another real agreement of tastes and wishes as to +daily life. They will generally have to give it up as hopeless, and +renounce the attempt to have, in the intimate associate of their +daily life, that _idem velle, idem nolle_, which is the recognised +bond of any society that is really such: or if the man succeeds in +obtaining it, he does so by choosing a woman who is so complete a +nullity that she has no _velle_ or _nolle_ at all, and is as ready to +comply with one thing as another if anybody tells her to do so. Even +this calculation is apt to fail; dulness and want of spirit are not +always a guarantee of the submission which is so confidently expected +from them. But if they were, is this the ideal of marriage? What, in +this case, does the man obtain by it, except an upper servant, a +nurse, or a mistress? On the contrary, when each of two persons, +instead of being a nothing, is a something; when they are attached to +one another, and are not too much unlike to begin with; the constant +partaking in the same things, assisted by their sympathy, draws out +the latent capacities of each for being interested in the things +which were at first interesting only to the other; and works a +gradual assimilation of the tastes and characters to one another, +partly by the insensible modification of each, but more by a real +enriching of the two natures, each acquiring the tastes and +capacities of the other in addition to its own. This often happens +between two friends of the same sex, who are much associated in their +daily life: and it would be a common, if not the commonest, case in +marriage, did not the totally different bringing-up of the two sexes +make it next to an impossibility to form a really well-assorted +union. Were this remedied, whatever differences there might still be +in individual tastes, there would at least be, as a general rule, +complete unity and unanimity as to the great objects of life. When +the two persons both care for great objects, and are a help and +encouragement to each other in whatever regards these, the minor +matters on which their tastes may differ are not all-important to +them; and there is a foundation for solid friendship, of an enduring +character, more likely than anything else to make it, through the +whole of life, a greater pleasure to each to give pleasure to the +other, than to receive it. + +I have considered, thus far, the effects on the pleasures and +benefits of the marriage union which depend on the mere unlikeness +between the wife and the husband: but the evil tendency is +prodigiously aggravated when the unlikeness is inferiority. Mere +unlikeness, when it only means difference of good qualities, may be +more a benefit in the way of mutual improvement, than a drawback from +comfort. When each emulates, and desires and endeavours to acquire, +the other's peculiar qualities, the difference does not produce +diversity of interest, but increased identity of it, and makes each +still more valuable to the other. But when one is much the inferior +of the two in mental ability and cultivation, and is not actively +attempting by the other's aid to rise to the other's level, the whole +influence of the connexion upon the development of the superior of +the two is deteriorating: and still more so in a tolerably happy +marriage than in an unhappy one. It is not with impunity that the +superior in intellect shuts himself up with an inferior, and elects +that inferior for his chosen, and sole completely intimate, +associate. Any society which is not improving, is deteriorating: and +the more so, the closer and more familiar it is. Even a really +superior man almost always begins to deteriorate when he is +habitually (as the phrase is) king of his company: and in his most +habitual company the husband who has a wife inferior to him is always +so. While his self-satisfaction is incessantly ministered to on the +one hand, on the other he insensibly imbibes the modes of feeling, +and of looking at things, which belong to a more vulgar or a more +limited mind than his own. This evil differs from many of those which +have hitherto been dwelt on, by being an increasing one. The +association of men with women in daily life is much closer and more +complete than it ever was before. Men's life is more domestic. +Formerly, their pleasures and chosen occupations were among men, and +in men's company: their wives had but a fragment of their lives. At +the present time, the progress of civilization, and the turn of +opinion against the rough amusements and convivial excesses which +formerly occupied most men in their hours of relaxation--together +with (it must be said) the improved tone of modern feeling as to the +reciprocity of duty which binds the husband towards the wife--have +thrown the man very much more upon home and its inmates, for his +personal and social pleasures: while the kind and degree of +improvement which has been made in women's education, has made them +in some degree capable of being his companions in ideas and mental +tastes, while leaving them, in most cases, still hopelessly inferior +to him. His desire of mental communion is thus in general satisfied +by a communion from which he learns nothing. An unimproving and +unstimulating companionship is substituted for (what he might +otherwise have been obliged to seek) the society of his equals in +powers and his fellows in the higher pursuits. We see, accordingly, +that young men of the greatest promise generally cease to improve as +soon as they marry, and, not improving, inevitably degenerate. If the +wife does not push the husband forward, she always holds him back. He +ceases to care for what she does not care for; he no longer desires, +and ends by disliking and shunning, society congenial to his former +aspirations, and which would now shame his falling-off from them; his +higher faculties both of mind and heart cease to be called into +activity. And this change coinciding with the new and selfish +interests which are created by the family, after a few years he +differs in no material respect from those who have never had wishes +for anything but the common vanities and the common pecuniary +objects. + +What marriage may be in the case of two persons of cultivated +faculties, identical in opinions and purposes, between whom there +exists that best kind of equality, similarity of powers and +capacities with reciprocal superiority in them--so that each can +enjoy the luxury of looking up to the other, and can have alternately +the pleasure of leading and of being led in the path of +development--I will not attempt to describe. To those who can +conceive it, there is no need; to those who cannot, it would appear +the dream of an enthusiast. But I maintain, with the profoundest +conviction, that this, and this only, is the ideal of marriage; and +that all opinions, customs, and institutions which favour any other +notion of it, or turn the conceptions and aspirations connected with +it into any other direction, by whatever pretences they may be +coloured, are relics of primitive barbarism. The moral regeneration +of mankind will only really commence, when the most fundamental of +the social relations is placed under the rule of equal justice, and +when human beings learn to cultivate their strongest sympathy with an +equal in rights and in cultivation. + +Thus far, the benefits which it has appeared that the world would +gain by ceasing to make sex a disqualification for privileges and a +badge of subjection, are social rather than individual; consisting in +an increase of the general fund of thinking and acting power, and an +improvement in the general conditions of the association of men with +women. But it would be a grievous understatement of the case to omit +the most direct benefit of all, the unspeakable gain in private +happiness to the liberated half of the species; the difference to +them between a life of subjection to the will of others, and a life +of rational freedom. After the primary necessities of food and +raiment, freedom is the first and strongest want of human nature. +While mankind are lawless, their desire is for lawless freedom. When +they have learnt to understand the meaning of duty and the value of +reason, they incline more and more to be guided and restrained by +these in the exercise of their freedom; but they do not therefore +desire freedom less; they do not become disposed to accept the will +of other people as the representative and interpreter of those +guiding principles. On the contrary, the communities in which the +reason has been most cultivated, and in which the idea of social duty +has been most powerful, are those which have most strongly asserted +the freedom of action of the individual--the liberty of each to +govern his conduct by his own feelings of duty, and by such laws and +social restraints as his own conscience can subscribe to. + +He who would rightly appreciate the worth of personal independence as +an element of happiness, should consider the value he himself puts +upon it as an ingredient of his own. There is no subject on which +there is a greater habitual difference of judgment between a man +judging for himself, and the same man judging for other people. When +he hears others complaining that they are not allowed freedom of +action--that their own will has not sufficient influence in the +regulation of their affairs--his inclination is, to ask, what are +their grievances? what positive damage they sustain? and in what +respect they consider their affairs to be mismanaged? and if they +fail to make out, in answer to these questions, what appears to him a +sufficient case, he turns a deaf ear, and regards their complaint as +the fanciful querulousness of people whom nothing reasonable will +satisfy. But he has a quite different standard of judgment when he is +deciding for himself. Then, the most unexceptionable administration +of his interests by a tutor set over him, does not satisfy his +feelings: his personal exclusion from the deciding authority appears +itself the greatest grievance of all, rendering it superfluous even +to enter into the question of mismanagement. It is the same with +nations. What citizen of a free country would listen to any offers of +good and skilful administration, in return for the abdication of +freedom? Even if he could believe that good and skilful +administration can exist among a people ruled by a will not their +own, would not the consciousness of working out their own destiny +under their own moral responsibility be a compensation to his +feelings for great rudeness and imperfection in the details of public +affairs? Let him rest assured that whatever he feels on this point, +women feel in a fully equal degree. Whatever has been said or +written, from the time of Herodotus to the present, of the ennobling +influence of free government--the nerve and spring which it gives to +all the faculties, the larger and higher objects which it presents to +the intellect and feelings, the more unselfish public spirit, and +calmer and broader views of duty, that it engenders, and the +generally loftier platform on which it elevates the individual as a +moral, spiritual, and social being--is every particle as true of +women as of men. Are these things no important part of individual +happiness? Let any man call to mind what he himself felt on emerging +from boyhood--from the tutelage and control of even loved and +affectionate elders--and entering upon the responsibilities of +manhood. Was it not like the physical effect of taking off a heavy +weight, or releasing him from obstructive, even if not otherwise +painful, bonds? Did he not feel twice as much alive, twice as much a +human being, as before? And does he imagine that women have none of +these feelings? But it is a striking fact, that the satisfactions and +mortifications of personal pride, though all in all to most men when +the case is their own, have less allowance made for them in the case +of other people, and are less listened to as a ground or a +justification of conduct, than any other natural human feelings; +perhaps because men compliment them in their own case with the names +of so many other qualities, that they are seldom conscious how mighty +an influence these feelings exercise in their own lives. No less +large and powerful is their part, we may assure ourselves, in the +lives and feelings of women. Women are schooled into suppressing them +in their most natural and most healthy direction, but the internal +principle remains, in a different outward form. An active and +energetic mind, if denied liberty, will seek for power: refused the +command of itself, it will assert its personality by attempting to +control others. To allow to any human beings no existence of their +own but what depends on others, is giving far too high a premium on +bending others to their purposes. Where liberty cannot be hoped for, +and power can, power becomes the grand object of human desire; those +to whom others will not leave the undisturbed management of their own +affairs, will compensate themselves, if they can, by meddling for +their own purposes with the affairs of others. Hence also women's +passion for personal beauty, and dress and display; and all the evils +that flow from it, in the way of mischievous luxury and social +immorality. The love of power and the love of liberty are in eternal +antagonism. Where there is least liberty, the passion for power is +the most ardent and unscrupulous. The desire of power over others can +only cease to be a depraving agency among mankind, when each of them +individually is able to do without it: which can only be where +respect for liberty in the personal concerns of each is an +established principle. + +But it is not only through the sentiment of personal dignity, that +the free direction and disposal of their own faculties is a source of +individual happiness, and to be fettered and restricted in it, a +source of unhappiness, to human beings, and not least to women. There +is nothing, after disease, indigence, and guilt, so fatal to the +pleasurable enjoyment of life as the want of a worthy outlet for the +active faculties. Women who have the cares of a family, and while +they have the cares of a family, have this outlet, and it generally +suffices for them: but what of the greatly increasing number of +women, who have had no opportunity of exercising the vocation which +they are mocked by telling them is their proper one? What of the +women whose children have been lost to them by death or distance, or +have grown up, married, and formed homes of their own? There are +abundant examples of men who, after a life engrossed by business, +retire with a competency to the enjoyment, as they hope, of rest, but +to whom, as they are unable to acquire new interests and excitements +that can replace the old, the change to a life of inactivity brings +ennui, melancholy, and premature death. Yet no one thinks of the +parallel case of so many worthy and devoted women, who, having paid +what they are told is their debt to society--having brought up a +family blamelessly to manhood and womanhood--having kept a house as +long as they had a house needing to be kept--are deserted by the sole +occupation for which they have fitted themselves; and remain with +undiminished activity but with no employment for it, unless perhaps a +daughter or daughter-in-law is willing to abdicate in their favour +the discharge of the same functions in her younger household. Surely +a hard lot for the old age of those who have worthily discharged, as +long as it was given to them to discharge, what the world accounts +their only social duty. Of such women, and of those others to whom +this duty has not been committed at all--many of whom pine through +life with the consciousness of thwarted vocations, and activities +which are not suffered to expand--the only resources, speaking +generally, are religion and charity. But their religion, though it +may be one of feeling, and of ceremonial observance, cannot be a +religion of action, unless in the form of charity. For charity many +of them are by nature admirably fitted; but to practise it usefully, +or even without doing mischief, requires the education, the manifold +preparation, the knowledge and the thinking powers, of a skilful +administrator. There are few of the administrative functions of +government for which a person would not be fit, who is fit to bestow +charity usefully. In this as in other cases (pre-eminently in that of +the education of children), the duties permitted to women cannot be +performed properly, without their being trained for duties which, to +the great loss of society, are not permitted to them. And here let me +notice the singular way in which the question of women's disabilities +is frequently presented to view, by those who find it easier to draw +a ludicrous picture of what they do not like, than to answer the +arguments for it. When it is suggested that women's executive +capacities and prudent counsels might sometimes be found valuable in +affairs of state, these lovers of fun hold up to the ridicule of the +world, as sitting in parliament or in the cabinet, girls in their +teens, or young wives of two or three and twenty, transported bodily, +exactly as they are, from the drawing-room to the House of Commons. +They forget that males are not usually selected at this early age for +a seat in Parliament, or for responsible political functions. Common +sense would tell them that if such trusts were confided to women, it +would be to such as having no special vocation for married life, or +preferring another employment of their faculties (as many women even +now prefer to marriage some of the few honourable occupations within +their reach), have spent the best years of their youth in attempting +to qualify themselves for the pursuits in which they desire to +engage; or still more frequently perhaps, widows or wives of forty or +fifty, by whom the knowledge of life and faculty of government which +they have acquired in their families, could by the aid of appropriate +studies be made available on a less contracted scale. There is no +country of Europe in which the ablest men have not frequently +experienced, and keenly appreciated, the value of the advice and help +of clever and experienced women of the world, in the attainment both +of private and of public objects; and there are important matters of +public administration to which few men are equally competent with +such women; among others, the detailed control of expenditure. But +what we are now discussing is not the need which society has of the +services of women in public business, but the dull and hopeless life +to which it so often condemns them, by forbidding them to exercise +the practical abilities which many of them are conscious of, in any +wider field than one which to some of them never was, and to others +is no longer, open. If there is anything vitally important to the +happiness of human beings, it is that they should relish their +habitual pursuit. This requisite of an enjoyable life is very +imperfectly granted, or altogether denied, to a large part of +mankind; and by its absence many a life is a failure, which is +provided, in appearance, with every requisite of success. But if +circumstances which society is not yet skilful enough to overcome, +render such failures often for the present inevitable, society need +not itself inflict them. The injudiciousness of parents, a youth's +own inexperience, or the absence of external opportunities for the +congenial vocation, and their presence for an uncongenial, condemn +numbers of men to pass their lives in doing one thing reluctantly and +ill, when there are other things which they could have done well and +happily. But on women this sentence is imposed by actual law, and by +customs equivalent to law. What, in unenlightened societies, colour, +race, religion, or in the case of a conquered country, nationality, +are to some men, sex is to all women; a peremptory exclusion from +almost all honourable occupations, but either such as cannot be +fulfilled by others, or such as those others do not think worthy of +their acceptance. Sufferings arising from causes of this nature +usually meet with so little sympathy, that few persons are aware of +the great amount of unhappiness even now produced by the feeling of a +wasted life. The case will be even more frequent, as increased +cultivation creates a greater and greater disproportion between the +ideas and faculties of women, and the scope which society allows to +their activity. + +When we consider the positive evil caused to the disqualified half of +the human race by their disqualification--first in the loss of the +most inspiriting and elevating kind of personal enjoyment, and next +in the weariness, disappointment, and profound dissatisfaction with +life, which are so often the substitute for it; one feels that among +all the lessons which men require for carrying on the struggle +against the inevitable imperfections of their lot on earth, there is +no lesson which they more need, than not to add to the evils which +nature inflicts, by their jealous and prejudiced restrictions on one +another. Their vain fears only substitute other and worse evils for +those which they are idly apprehensive of: while every restraint on +the freedom of conduct of any of their human fellow creatures, +(otherwise than by making them responsible for any evil actually +caused by it), dries up _pro tanto_ the principal fountain of human +happiness, and leaves the species less rich, to an inappreciable +degree, in all that makes life valuable to the individual human +being. + + THE END. + + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg's The Subjection of Women, by John Stuart Mill + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN *** + +***** This file should be named 27083.txt or 27083.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/2/7/0/8/27083/ + +Produced by Michael Roe and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images generously made available by The +Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
