diff options
Diffstat (limited to '26397.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 26397.txt | 2475 |
1 files changed, 2475 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/26397.txt b/26397.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd67ed5 --- /dev/null +++ b/26397.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2475 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Miracles and Supernatural Religion, by +James Morris Whiton + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Miracles and Supernatural Religion + +Author: James Morris Whiton + +Release Date: August 23, 2008 [EBook #26397] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MIRACLES AND SUPERNATURAL RELIGION *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Stephen Blundell and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + + + + + + + + + MIRACLES + + AND + + SUPERNATURAL RELIGION + + + BY + JAMES MORRIS WHITON, PH.D. (YALE) + + + _Portentum non fit contra naturam, sed + contra quam est nota natura_ + --AUGUSTINE + + + New York + THE MACMILLAN COMPANY + LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., LTD. + 1903 + + _All rights reserved_ + + + + + COPYRIGHT, 1903, + BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. + + Set up, electrotyped, and published May, 1903. + + + Norwood Press + J. S. Cushing & Co.--Berwick & Smith Co. + Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. + + + + +Transcriber's Note: + + Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note. Variant + spellings have been retained. {=e} represents e with upper macron. + + + + +To + +M. B. W. + + + + +PREFATORY NOTE + + +While the present subject of discussion tempts to many an excursion into +particulars, its treatment is restricted to general outlines, with an +aim simply to clarify current ideas of miracle and the supernatural, so +as to find firm holding ground for tenable positions in the present +"drift period" of theology. The chief exception made to this general +treatment is the discussion given to a class of miracles regarded with +as much incredulity as any, yet as capable as any of being accredited as +probably historical events--the raisings of the "dead." The insistence +of some writers on the virgin birth and corporeal resurrection of Jesus +as essential to Christianity has required brief discussion of these +also, mainly with reference to the reasonableness of that demand. As to +the latter miracle, it must be observed that in the Biblical narratives +taken as a whole, whichever of their discordant features one be disposed +to emphasize, the psychical element clearly preponderates over the +physical and material. + + J. M. W. + NEW YORK, + April 11, 1903. + + + + +CONTENTS + + + PAGE + INTRODUCTORY 13 + + THE ARGUMENT + + I + + The gradual narrowing of the miraculous element in the Bible + by recent discovery and discussion.--The alarm thereby + excited in the Church.--The fallacy which generates the + fear.--The atheistic conception of nature which generates + the fallacy.--The present outgrowing of this conception. 25 + + II + + The present net results of the discussion of the miraculous + element in the Bible.--Evaporation of the former evidential + value of miracles.--Further insistence on this value a + logical blunder.--The transfer of miracles from the + artillery to the baggage of the Church.--Probability of a + further reduction of the list of miracles.--Also of a + further transfer of events reputed miraculous to the domain + of history. 37 + + III + + Arbitrary criticism of the Biblical narratives of the raising + of the "dead."--Facts which it ignores.--The subject + related to the phenomena of trance, and records of + premature burial.--The resuscitation in Elisha's tomb + probably historical.--Jesus' raising of the ruler's + daughter plainly such a case.--His raising of the widow's + son probably such.--The hypothesis that his raising of + Lazarus may also have been such critically examined.--The + record allows this supposition.--Further considerations + favoring it: 1. The supposition threatens no real interest + of Christianity.--2. Enhances the character of the act as a + work of mercy.--3. Is independent of the belief of the + witnesses of the act.--4. Is coherent with the general + conception of the healing works of Jesus as wrought by a + peculiar psychical power.--Other cases.--The resurrection + of Jesus an event in a wholly different order of + things.--The practical result of regarding these + resuscitations as in the order of nature. 47 + + IV + + A clearer conception of miracle approached.--Works of Jesus + once reputed miraculous not so reputed now, since not now + transcending as once the existing range of knowledge and + power.--This transfer of the miraculous to the natural + likely to continue.--No hard and fast line between the + miraculous and the non-miraculous.--Miracle a provisional + word, its application narrowing in the enlarging mastery of + the secrets of Nature and of life. 75 + + V + + Biblical miracles the effluence of extraordinary lives.--Life + the world's magician and miracle-worker; its miracles now + termed _prodigies_.--Miracle the natural product of an + extraordinary endowment of life.--Life the ultimate + reality.--What any man can achieve is conditioned by the + psychical quality of his life.--Nothing more natural, more + supernatural, than life.--The derived life of the world + filial to the self-existent life of God; "begotten, not + made."--Miracle as the product of life, the work of God. 85 + + VI + + The question, old and new, now confronting + theologians.--Their recent retreat upon the minimum of + miracle.--The present conflict of opinion in the + Church.--Its turning-point reached in the antipodal + turn-about in the treatment of miracles from the old to the + new apologetics.--Revision of the traditional idea of the + supernatural required for theological readjustment. 95 + + VII + + Account to be made of the law of atrophy through disuse.--The + virgin birth and the corporeal resurrection of Jesus, the + two miracles still insisted on as the irreducible minimum, + affected by this law.--The vital truths of the incarnation + and immortality independent of these miracles.--These + truths now placed on higher ground in a truer conception of + the supernatural.--The true supernatural is the spiritual, + not the miraculous.--Scepticism bred from the contrary + view.--The miracle-narratives, while less evidential for + religion, not unimportant for history.--Psychical research + a needed auxiliary for the scientific critic of these. 107 + + VIII + + The cardinal point in the present discussion the reality not + of miracles, but of the supernatural.--Fallacy of pointing + to physical events as essential characteristics of + supernatural Revelation.--The character of a revelation + determined not by its circumstances, but by its + contents.--Moral nature supernatural to physical.--Nature a + hierarchy of natures.--Supernatural Religion historically + attested by the moral development it generates.--Transfer + of its distinctive note from moral ideals to physical + marvels a costly error.--Jesus' miracles _a_ revelation, of + a type common with others before and after.--The unique + Revelation of Jesus was in the higher realm of divine ideas + and ideals.--These, while unrealized in human life, still + exhibit the fact of a supernatural Revelation.--The + distinction of natural and supernatural belongs to the + period of moral progress up to the spiritual maturity of + man in the image of God.--The divine possibilities of + humanity, imaged in Jesus, revealed as our inheritance and + our prize. 131 + + + + +INTRODUCTORY + + +In a historical retrospect greater and more revolutionary changes are +seen to have occurred during the nineteenth century than in any century +preceding. In these changes no department of thought and activity has +failed to share, and theological thought has been quite as much affected +as scientific or ethical. Especially remarkable is the changed front of +Christian theologians toward miracles, their distinctly lowered estimate +of the significance of miracle, their antipodal reverse of the long +established treatment of miracles. Referring to this a British +evangelical writer[1] observes that "the intelligent believer of our +own day, ... instead of accepting Christianity on the ground of the +miracles, accepts it in spite of the miracles. Whether he admits these +miracles, or rejects them, his attitude toward them is toward +difficulties, not helps." + +By this diametrical change of Christian thought a great amount of +scepticism has already been antiquated. A once famous anti-Christian +book, _Supernatural Religion_, regarded as formidable thirty years ago, +is now as much out of date for relevancy to present theological +conditions as is the old smooth-bore cannon for naval warfare. That +many, indeed, are still unaware of the change that has been experienced +by the leaders of Christian thought, no one acquainted with current +discussions will deny; the fact is indubitable. It is reviewed in the +following pages with the constructive purpose of redeeming the idea of +supernatural Religion from pernicious perversion, and of exhibiting it +in its true spiritual significance. The once highly reputed calculations +made to show how the earth's diurnal revolution could be imperceptibly +stopped for Joshua's convenience, and the contention that the +Mediterranean produced fish with gullets capable of giving passage to +Jonah, are now as dead as the chemical controversy about phlogiston. Yet +some sceptical controversialists are still so far from cultivating the +acquaintance with recent thought which they recommend to Christian +theologians, as to persist in affirmations of amazing ignorance, _e.g._ +"It is admitted that miracles alone can attest the reality of divine +revelation."[2] Sponsors for this statement must now be sought among +unlearned Christians, or among a few scholars who survive as +cultivators of the old-fashioned argument from the "evidences." Even +among these latter the tendency to minimize miracle is undeniably +apparent in a reduction of the list classified as such, and still more +in the brevity of the list insisted on for the attestation of +Christianity. + +A transitional state of mind is clearly evidenced by the present +division and perplexity of Christian thought concerning the Christian +miracles. Many seem to regard further discussion as profitless, and are +ready to shelve the subject. But this attitude of weariness is also +transitional. There must be some thoroughfare to firm ground and clear +vision. It must be found in agreement, first of all, on the real meaning +of a term so variously and vaguely used as _miracle_. In the present +imperfect state of knowledge it may be impossible to enucleate miracle, +however defined, of all mystery. But even so will much be gained for +clear thinking, if miracle can be reasonably related to the greater +mystery which all accept, though none understand,--the mystery of +_life_. This view of the dynamic relation of life to miracle[3] is here +suggested for what it may prove to be worth. + +The great and general change that transfigured theology during the +nineteenth century was characteristically ethical. This, indeed, is the +distinctive feature of the so-called new theology, in contrast with that +which the Protestant Reformers inherited from St. Augustine. God and +Man, Faith, Salvation and Inspiration, Redemption and Atonement, +Judgment and Retribution,--all these themes are now presented in +orthodox pulpits far more conformably to ethical principles, though in +degrees varying with educated intelligence, than was customary in the +sermons of half a century ago. "One great source and spring of +theological progress," says Professor Bowne, in his recent work on +_Theism_, "has been the need of finding a conception of God which the +moral nature could accept. The necessity of moralizing theology has +produced vast changes in that field; and the end is not yet." + +The ethical character of the theological change will perhaps be most +obvious in the field of Biblical study, to which the present subject +belongs. The traditional solution of such moral difficulties in the Old +Testament as commands, ostensibly divine, to massacre idolaters has +been quite discarded. It is no longer the mode to say that deeds +seemingly atrocious were not atrocious, because God commanded them. +Writers of orthodox repute now say that the _Thus saith the Lord_, with +which Samuel prefaced his order to exterminate the Amalekites, must be +understood subjectively, as an expression of the prophet's belief, not +objectively, as a divine command communicated to him. This great change +is a quite recent change. If a personal reference may be indulged, it is +not twenty years since the present writer's published protest against +"The Anti-Christian Use of the Bible in the Sunday School,"[4] the +exhibition to children of some vestiges of heathen superstition embedded +in the Old Testament narratives as true illustrations of God's ways +toward men, drew forth from a religious journal a bitter editorial on +"The Old Testament and its New Enemies." But a great light has since +dawned in that quarter. It is no longer deemed subversive of faith in a +divine Revelation to hold that the prophet Gad was not infallible in +regarding the plague which scourged Jerusalem as sent to punish David's +pride in his census of the nation. + +A significant fact is presented in the comparison of these two aspects +of the theological change that has come to pass,--the growing importance +of the ethical, and the dwindling importance of the miraculous in the +religious thought of to-day. This may reassure those who fear whereto +such change may grow. The inner significance of such a change is most +auspicious. It portends the displacement of a false by the true +conception of supernatural Religion, and the removal thereby of a +serious antagonism between Science and Christian Theology, as well as of +a serious hindrance of many thoughtful minds from an intelligent embrace +of Christianity. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] Professor W. T. Adeney in the _Hibbert Journal_, January, 1903, p. +302. + +[2] See the recent new edition of _Supernatural Religion_, "carefully +revised." + +[3] For an earlier statement of this by the present writer, see a +discourse on "Miracle and Life," in _New Points to Old Texts_. London: +James Clarke & Co., 1889. New York: Thomas Whittaker. + +[4] _The New Englander_, September, 1884. + + + + +MIRACLES AND SUPERNATURAL RELIGION + +I + + + + +I + + SYNOPSIS.--The gradual narrowing of the miraculous element in the + Bible by recent discovery and discussion.--The alarm thereby excited + in the Church.--The fallacy which generates the fear.--The atheistic + conception of nature which generates the fallacy.--The present + outgrowing of this conception. + + +It is barely forty years since that beloved and fearless Christian +scholar, Dean Stanley, spoke thus of the miracles recorded of the +prophet Elisha: "His works stand alone in the Bible in their likeness to +the acts of mediaeval saints. There alone in the Sacred History the gulf +between Biblical and Ecclesiastical miracles almost disappears."[5] It +required some courage to say as much as this then, while the storm of +persecution was raging against Bishop Colenso for his critical work on +the Pentateuch. The evangelical clergymen in England and the United +States then prepared to confess as much as this, with all that it +obviously implies, could have been seated in a small room. But time has +moved on, and the Church, at least the scholars of the Church, have +moved with it. No scholar of more than narrowly local repute now +hesitates to acknowledge the presence of a legendary element both in the +Old Testament and in the New. While the extent of it is still +undetermined, many specimens of it are recognized. It is agreed that the +early narratives in Genesis are of this character, and that it is marked +in such stories as those of Samson, Elijah, and Elisha. Even the +conservative revisers of the Authorized Version have eliminated from the +Fourth Gospel the story of the angel at the pool of Bethesda, and in +their marginal notes on the Third Gospel have admitted a doubt +concerning the historicity of the angel and the bloody sweat in +Gethsemane. + +Furthermore, some events, recognized as historical, have been divested +of the miraculous character once attributed to them,--the crossing of +the Red Sea, for instance, by the Hebrew host. A landslip in the +thirteenth century A.D. has been noted as giving historical character to +the story of the Hebrew host under Joshua's command crossing the Jordan +"on dry ground," but in a perfectly natural way. Other classes of +phenomena once regarded as miraculous have been transferred to the +domain of natural processes by the investigations and discoveries that +have been made in the field of psychical research. The forewarning which +God is said to have given the prophet Ahijah of the visit that the +queen was about to pay him in disguise[6] is now recognized as one of +many cases of the mysterious natural function that we label as +"telepathy." The transformations of unruly, vicious, and mentally +disordered characters by hypnotic influence that have been effected at +the Salpetriere in Paris, and elsewhere, by physicians expert in +psychical therapeutics are closely analogous to the cures wrought by +Jesus on some victims of "demoniac possession."[7] The cases of +apparition,[8] also, which have been investigated and verified by the +Society for Psychical Research have laid a solid basis of fact for the +Biblical stories of angels, as at least, a class of phenomena to be +regarded as by no means altogether legendary, but having their place +among natural though mysterious occurrences. + +But this progressive paring down of the miraculous element in the Bible +has caused outcries of unfeigned alarm. Christian scholars who have +taken part in it are reproached as deserters to the camp of unbelief. +They are accused of banishing God from his world, and of reducing the +course of events to an order of agencies quite undivine. "Miracle," +writes one of these brethren,[9] "is the personal intervention of God +into the chain of cause and effect." But what does this mean, except +that, when no miracles occur, God is not personally, _i.e._ actively, in +the chain of natural causes and effects? As Professor Drummond says, "If +God appears periodically, he disappears periodically." It is precisely +this view of the subject that really banishes God from his world. Those +who thus define miracle regard miracles as having ceased at the end of +the Apostolic age in the first century. Except, therefore, for the +narrow range of human history that the Bible covers in time and place, +God has not been personally in the chain of natural causes and effects. +Thus close to an atheistic conception of nature does zeal for +traditional orthodoxy unwittingly but really come. + +The first pages of the Bible correct this error. "While the earth +remaineth," so God is represented as assuring Noah, "seedtime and +harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night, +shall not cease." The presence of God in his world was thus to be +evinced by his regular sustentation of its natural order, rather than by +irregular occurrences, such as the deluge, in seeming contravention of +it. To seek the evidence of divine activity in human affairs and to +ground one's faith in a controlling Providence in sporadic and cometary +phenomena, rather than in the constant and cumulative signs of it to be +seen in the majestic order of the starry skies, in the reign of +intelligence throughout the cosmos, in the moral evolution of ancient +savagery into modern philanthropy, in the historic manifestation +throughout the centuries of a Power not our own that works for the +increase of righteousness, is a mode of thought which in our time is +being steadily and surely outgrown. It is one of those "idols of the +tribe" whose power alike over civilized and uncivilized men is broken +less by argument than by the ascent of man to wider horizons of +knowledge. + +It is for the gain of religion that it should be broken,--of the +spiritual religion whose God is not a tradition, a reminiscence, but a +living presence, inhabiting alike the clod and the star, the flower in +the crannied wall and the life of man. So thinking of God the religious +man may rightly say,[10] "If it is more difficult to believe in +miracles, it is less important. If the extraordinary manifestations of +God recounted in ancient history appear less credible, the ordinary +manifestations of God in current life appear more real. He is seen in +American history not less than in Hebrew history; in the life of to-day +not less than in the life of long ago." + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[5] _Lectures on the History of the Jewish Church_, Vol. II, p. 362, +American edition. + +[6] 1 Kings xiv. 1-7. + +[7] It is not intended to intimate that there is no such darker reality +as a "possession" that is "demoniac" indeed. It cannot be reasonably +pronounced superstitious to judge that there is some probability for +that view. At any rate, it is certain that the problem is not to be +settled by dogmatic pronouncement. It is certain, also, that the burden +of proof rests on those who contend that there can be no such thing. On +the other hand, it may be conceded that the cases recorded in the New +Testament do not seem to be of an essentially devilish kind. On the +general subject of "possession" see F. W. H. Myers's work on _Human +Personality and Survival after Death_, Vol. I. (Longmans, Green & Co., +New York and London.) Professor William James half humorously remarks: +"The time-honored phenomenon of diabolical possession is on the point of +being admitted by the scientist as a fact, now that he has the name of +hysterodemonopathy by which to apperceive it." _Varieties of Religious +Experience_, p. 501, note. + +[8] See _Dictionary of Psychology_, art. "Psychical Research." + +[9] Dr. Peloubet, _Teachers' Commentary on the Acts_, 1902. + +[10] Dr. Lyman Abbott in _The Outlook_, February 14, 1903. + + + + +II + + + + +II + + SYNOPSIS.--The present net results of the discussion of the + miraculous element in the Bible.--Evaporation of the former + evidential value of miracles.--Further insistence on this value a + logical blunder.--The transfer of miracles from the artillery to the + baggage of the Church.--Probability of a further reduction of the + list of miracles.--Also of a further transfer of events reputed + miraculous to the domain of history. + + +The cultivation of scientific and historical studies during the last +century, especially in its latter half, has deepened the conviction that + + "Through the ages one increasing purpose runs;" + +has disposed a growing number of thoughtful minds to regard occasional +signs and wonders, reported from ancient times, as far less evidential +for the reasonableness of religious faith than the steady sustentation +of the Providential order and the moral progress of the world. Fully +convinced of this, we should now estimate, before proceeding further, +the present net results of the discussion, so far as it has gone, of +what is called the miraculous element in the Bible. + +First, its former evidential value in proof of divine Revelation is gone +for the men of to-day. The believer in a divine Revelation does not now, +if he is wise, rest his case at all on the miracles connected with its +original promulgation, as was the fashion not very long since. This for +two reasons; chiefly this: that _the decisive criterion of any truth, +ethical or physical, must be truth of the same kind_. Ethical truth must +be ethically attested. The moral and religious character of the +Revelation presents its credentials of worth in its history of the +moral and religious renovations it has wrought both in individuals and +in society. This is its proper and incontrovertible attestation, in need +of no corroboration from whatever wonderful physical occurrences may +have accompanied its first utterance. Words of God are attested as such +by the work of God which they effect. It may well be believed that those +wonderful occurrences--the Biblical name for which is "signs," or +"powers," terms not carrying, like "miracles," the idea of something +contra-natural[11]--had an evidential value for those to whom the +Revelation originally came. In fact, they were appealed to by the +bearers of the Revelation as evidencing its divine origin by the mighty +works of divine mercy which they wrought for sufferers from the evils of +the world. But whatever their evidential value to the eye-witnesses at +that remote day, it was of the inevitably volatile kind that exhales +away like a perfume with lapse of time. Historic doubts attack remote +events, especially when of the extraordinary character which tempts the +narrator to that magnifying of the marvellous which experience has found +to be a constantly recurring human trait. It is simply impossible that +the original evidential value of the "signs" accompanying the Revelation +should continue permanently unimpaired. To employ them now as +"evidences of Christianity," when the Revelation has won on ethical +grounds recognition of its divine character and can summon history to +bear witness of its divine effects in the moral uplift of the world, is +to imperil the Christian argument by the preposterous logical blunder of +attempting to prove the more certain by the less certain. + +A second net result consequent on the preceding may be described as the +transference of miracles from the ordnance department to the +quartermaster's department of the Church. Until recently they were +actively used as part of its armament, none of which could be dispensed +with. Now they are carried as part of its baggage, _impedimenta_, from +which everything superfluous must be removed. It is clearly seen that to +retain all is to imperil the whole. That there are miracles and +miracles is patent to minds that have learned to scan history more +critically than when a scholar like John Milton began his _History of +England_ with the legend of the voyage of "Brute the Trojan." One may +reasonably believe that Jesus healed a case of violent insanity at +Gadara, and reasonably disbelieve that the fire of heaven was twice +obedient to Elijah's call to consume the military companies sent to +arrest him. Cultivated discernment does not now put all Biblical +miracles on a common level of credibility, any more than the historical +work of Herodotus and that of the late Dr. Gardiner. To defend them all +is not to vindicate, but to discredit all alike. The elimination of the +indefensible, the setting aside of the legendary, the transference of +the supposedly miraculous to the order of natural powers and processes +so far as vindicable ground for such critical treatment is discovered, +is the only way to answer the first of all questions concerning the +Bible: How much of this is credible history? Thus it is not only +thoroughly reasonable, but is in the interest of a reasonable belief +that divine agency is revealed rather by the upholding of the +established order of Nature than by any alleged interference therewith. +With what God has established God never interferes. To allege his +interference with his established order is virtually to deny his +constant immanence therein, a failure to recognize the fundamental fact +that "Nature is Spirit," as Principal Fairbairn has said, and all its +processes and powers the various modes of the energizing of the divine +Will. + +A third net result now highly probable is a still further reduction of +the list of reputed miracles. The critical process of discriminating +the historical from the legendary, and the natural from the non-natural, +is still so comparatively recent that it can hardly be supposed to have +reached its limit. Nor can it be stayed by any impeachment of it as +hostile to Christianity, whose grand argument appeals to its present +ethical effects, not to ancient thaumaturgical accompaniments. There is, +however, a considerable class of cases in which the advancing critical +process is likely even to gain credibility for the Biblical narrative in +a point where it is now widely doubted--the resuscitations of the +apparently dead. Among all the Biblical miracles none have more probably +a secure historical basis. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[11] The Anglicized Latin word, "miracle," indiscriminately used in the +Authorized Version, denotes the superficial character of the act or +event it is applied to, as producing wonder or amazement in the +beholders. The terms commonly employed in the New Testament +(_s{=e}meion_, a sign; _dunamis_, power; less frequently _teras_, a +portent) are of deeper significance, and connote the inner nature of the +occurrence, either as requiring to be pondered for its meaning, or as +the product of a new and peculiar energy. + + + + +III + + + + +III + + SYNOPSIS.--Arbitrary criticism of the Biblical narratives of the + raising of the "dead."--Facts which it ignores.--The subject related + to the phenomena of trance, and records of premature burial.--The + resuscitation in Elisha's tomb probably historical.--Jesus' raising + of the ruler's daughter plainly a case of this kind.--His raising of + the widow's son probably such.--The hypothesis that his raising of + Lazarus may also have been such critically examined.--The record + allows this supposition.--Further considerations favoring it: 1. The + real interests of Christianity secure.--2. The miracle as a work of + mercy.--3. Incompetency of the bystanders' opinion.--4. Congruity + with the general conception of the healing works of Jesus, as + wrought by a peculiar psychical power.--Other cases.--The + resurrection of Jesus an event in a wholly different order of + things.--The practical result of regarding these resuscitations as + in the order of nature. + + +Of resuscitation from apparent death seven cases in all are +recorded,--three in the Old Testament and four in the New. Some critics +arbitrarily reject all but one of these as legendary. Thus Oscar +Holzmann, in his recent _Leben Jesu_, treats the raising of the widow's +son, and of Lazarus. But he accepts the case of the ruler's daughter on +the ground that Jesus is reported as saying that it was not a case of +real but only of apparent death,--"the child is not dead, but sleepeth." +But for the preservation of this saving declaration in the record, this +case also would have been classed with the others as unhistorical. And +yet the admission of one clear case of simulated death, so like real +death as to deceive all the onlookers but Jesus, might reasonably check +the critic with the suggestion that it may not have been a solitary +case.[12] The headlong assumption involved in the discrimination made +between these two classes, viz. that in a case of apparent but unreal +death the primitive tradition can be depended on to put the fact upon +record, is in the highest degree arbitrary and unwarrantable. + +The scepticism which lightly contradicts the Biblical narratives of the +raising of the "dead" to life is seemingly ignorant of facts that go far +to place these upon firm ground as historical occurrences. Catalepsy, +or the simulation of death by a trance, in which the body is sometimes +cold and rigid, sensation gone, the heart still, is well known to +medical men.[13] In early times such a condition would inevitably have +been regarded and treated as actual death, without the least suspicion +that it was not so. Even now, the dreadful mistake of so regarding it +sometimes occurs. So cautious a journal as the London _Spectator_ a few +years ago expressed the belief that "a distinct percentage" of premature +burials "occurs every year" in England. + +The proper line of critical approach to the study of the Biblical +narratives of the raising of the "dead" is through the well-known facts +of the deathlike trance and premature burial. + +Where burial occurred, as in the East, immediately after the apparent +death,[14] resuscitation must have been rare. Yet cases of it were not +unknown. Pliny has a chapter "on those who have revived on being carried +forth for burial." Lord Bacon states that of this there have been "very +many cases." A French writer of the eighteenth century, Bruhier, in his +"_Dissertations sur l'Incertitude de la Mort et l'Abus des +Enterrements_," records seventy-two cases of mistaken pronouncement of +death, fifty-three of revival in the coffin before burial, and +fifty-four of burial alive. A locally famous and thoroughly attested +case in this country is that of the Rev. William Tennent, pastor in +Freehold, New Jersey, in the eighteenth century, who lay apparently dead +for three days, reviving from trance just as his delayed funeral was +about to proceed. One who keeps a scrap-book could easily collect quite +an assortment of such cases, and of such others as have a tragic ending, +both from domestic and foreign journals. A work published some years ago +by Dr. F. Hartmann[15] exhibits one hundred and eight cases as typical +among over seven hundred that have been authenticated.[16] + +Facts like these have been strangely overlooked in the hasty judgment +prompted by prejudice against whatever has obtained credence as +miraculous. Some significant considerations must be seriously +entertained. + +It cannot be that no such facts occurred in the long periods covered by +the Biblical writers. Occurring, it is extremely improbable that they +should have altogether escaped embodiment in popular tradition and its +record. Furthermore, while on one hand the custom of speedy burial +rendered them much rarer than they are now under other conditions, and +so much the more extraordinary, the universal ignorance of the causes +involved would have accepted resuscitation as veritable restoration from +actual death. As such it would have passed into tradition. In cases +where it had come to pass in connection with the efforts of a recognized +prophet, or through any contact with him, it would certainly have been +regarded as a genuine miracle. + +Among the raisings of the "dead" recorded in the Scriptures probably +none has been so widely doubted by critical readers as the story in the +thirteenth chapter of the second book of Kings, in which a corpse is +restored to life by contact with the bones of Elisha. Dean Stanley's +remark upon the suspicious similarity between the miracles related of +Elisha and those found in Roman Catholic legends of great saints here +seems quite pertinent. Let the record speak for itself. + + "And Elisha died and they buried him. Now the bands of the Moabites + invaded the land at the coming in of the year. And it came to pass, + as they were burying a man, that, behold, they spied a band; and + they cast the man into the sepulchre of Elisha; and as soon as the + man touched the bones of Elisha, he revived, and stood up on his + feet." + +The bizarre character of such a story excusably predisposes many a +critic to stamp it as fabricated to enhance the glory of the great +prophet who had been a pillar of the throne. Yet nothing is more likely +than that tradition has here preserved a bit of history, extraordinary, +but real. There is not the least improbability in regarding the case as +one of the many revivals from the deathlike trance that have been noted +by writers ancient and modern. It is entirely reasonable to suppose that +the trance in which the seemingly dead man lay was broken either by the +shock of his fall into the prophet's tomb, or coincidently therewith; +and stranger coincidences have happened. Such a happening would be +precisely the sort of thing to live in popular tradition, and to be +incorporated into the annals of the time. + +Here it may be rejoined that this is only a hypothesis. Only that, to be +sure. But so is the allegation that the story is a mere fantastic +fabrication only a hypothesis. Demonstration of the actual fact past all +controversy being out of the question, all that can be offered for the +attempt to rate the narrative at its proper value, either as history or +as fiction, is hypothesis. The choice lies for us between two +hypotheses. Surely, that hypothesis is the more credible which is based +on a solid body of objective facts, and meets all the conditions of the +case. + +Will it be replied to this that the critics can show for their +hypothesis the admitted fact of the human proclivity to invent legends +of miracle? The decisive answer is that the burden of proof rests on him +who contests any statement ostensibly historical. If such a statement be +found to square with admitted objective facts, it must be accepted +notwithstanding considerations drawn from the subjective tendency to +invent extraordinary tales. + +Were raisings of the "dead" recorded in the Old Testament alone, +objection would less often be offered to this transference of them, +along with other occurrences once deemed miraculous, to a place in the +natural order of things. The statistics of premature burial and of the +resuscitation of the apparently dead before burial are sufficiently +strong to throw grave doubt on any contention that the resuscitations +narrated of Elijah[17] and Elisha[18] do not belong in that historical +series. It has been frequently observed, however, that there is much +reluctance to apply to the New Testament the methods and canons of +criticism that are applied to the Old. It will be so in the present +case, through apprehension of somehow detracting from the distinctive +glory of Christ. That fear will not disturb one who sees that glory not +in his "mighty works," the like of which were wrought by the prophets, +but in the spiritual majesty of his personality, the divineness of his +message to the world, and of the life and death that illustrated it. + +One case, at least, among Jesus' raisings of the "dead," that of the +young daughter of the ruler of the synagogue,[19] is admitted even by +sceptical critics to have been a resuscitation from the trance that +merely simulates death. But the fact that there is a record of his +saying in this case, "the child is not dead, but sleepeth," and no +record of his saying the same at the bier of the widow's son,[20] is +slight ground, yet all the ground there is, against the great +probabilities to the contrary, for regarding the latter case as so +transcendently different from the former as the actual reembodiment of a +departed spirit recalled from another world. Were these the only two +cases of restoration to life in the ministry of Jesus, it is most +probable that they would be regarded as of the same kind. + +The raising of Lazarus[21] presents peculiar features, in view of which +it is generally regarded as of another kind, and the greatest of +miracles, so stupendous that the Rev. W. J. Dawson, in his recent _Life +of Christ_, written from an evangelical standpoint, says of it: "Even +the most devout mind may be forgiven occasional pangs of incredulity." +But the considerations already presented are certainly sufficient to +justify a reexamination of the case. And it is to be borne in mind that +the question at issue is, not what the eye-witnesses at that time +believed, not what the Church from that time to this has believed, not +what we are willing to believe, or would like to believe, but what all +the facts with any bearing on the case, taken together, fully justify us +in believing as to the real nature of it. + +What Jesus is recorded as saying of it is, of course, of prime +importance. "Our friend Lazarus is fallen asleep, but I go that I may +awake him out of sleep." Were this all, the case might easily have been +classed as one of trance. The disciples, however, understood Jesus to +speak of natural sleep. "Then Jesus therefore said unto them plainly, +_Lazarus is dead_." Tradition puts the maximum meaning into this word +"dead." But if this word here qualifies the preceding word, "fallen +asleep," so also is it qualified by that; the two are mutually +explanatory, not contradictory. These alternatives are before us: Is the +maximum or the minimum meaning to be assigned to the crucial word +"dead"? For the minimum, one can say that a deathly trance, already made +virtual death by immediate interment, would amply justify Jesus in using +the word "dead" in order to impress the disciples with the gravity of +the case, as not a natural but a deathly, and, in the existing +situation, a fatal sleep. For the maximum, no more can be advanced than +the hazardous assertion that Jesus _must_ have used the word with +technical precision in its customary sense; an assertion of course +protected from disproof by our ignorance of the actual fact.[22] But +whatever support this view of the case derives from such ignorance is +overbalanced by the support supplied to the other view by the long +history of revivals from the deathly trance, and by the probabilities +which that history creates. + +Many, to whom the view here proposed seems not only new, but unwelcome, +and even revolutionary, may reasonably prefer to suspend judgment for +reflection; but meanwhile some further considerations may be +entertained. + +1. Aside from the unwillingness to abandon a long-cherished belief on +any subject whatever, which is both a natural, and, when not pushed to +an unreasonable length, a desirable brake on all inconsiderate change, +no practical interest is threatened by the adoption of the view here +suggested. Religious interest, so far as it is also intelligent, is +certainly not threatened. The evidences of Jesus' divine character and +mission resting, as for modern men it rests, not on remote wonders, but +on now acknowledged facts of an ethical and spiritual kind, is +altogether independent of our conclusion whether it was from actual or +only apparent death that Lazarus was raised. Since all the mighty works +wrought by Jesus, and this among them, were identical in type with those +wrought by the ancient prophets, with whom his countrymen classed him in +his lifetime, their evidential significance could be, even for the +eye-witnesses at that tomb, no greater for him than for an +Elisha,--signs of a divine mission attesting itself by works of mercy. + +2. As works of mercy these raisings from the "dead," including that of +Lazarus, rank far higher in the view of them here proposed than in the +traditional view. This regards them as the recall of departed spirits +from what is hoped to be "a better world." Yet this, while it turns +sorrow for a time into joy, involves not only the recurrence of that +sorrow in all its keenness, but also a second tasting of the pains +preliminary to the death-gate, when the time comes to pass that gate +again. But in the other view, a raising from the death that is only +simulated is a merciful deliverance from a calamity greater than simple +death, if that be any calamity at all,--the fate of burial alive. In the +former view, therefore, the quality of mercy, distinctive of the mighty +works of Jesus, is imperfectly demonstrable. In the present view, as the +rescue of the living from death in one of its most horrible forms, it is +abundantly conspicuous. + +3. The onlookers by the tomb of Lazarus doubtless regarded his awakening +as revival from actual death. Their opinion, however, does not bind our +judgment any more than it is bound by the opinion of other onlookers, +that Jesus' healing of the insane and epileptic was through the +expulsion of demons that possessed them. In each instance it was +understood as a sign of control over beings belonging to another world. +But such an attestation of Jesus' divine mission, having been superseded +for us by proofs of higher character, is now no more needful for us in +the case of the "dead" than in the case of the "demons." + +4. The power of breaking the deathly trance, of quickening the dormant +life, reenergizing the collapsed nervous organism, and ending its +paralysis of sensation and motion, may be reasonably regarded as power +of the same psychical kind that Jesus regularly exerted in healing the +sufferers from nervous disorders who were reputed victims of demoniac +possession.[23] In this view these resuscitations from apparent death +appear in natural coherence with the many other works of mercy that +Jesus wrought as the Great Physician of his people, and may be regarded +as the crown and consummation of all his restorative ministries. Jesus' +thanksgiving after the tomb had been opened--"Father, I thank thee that +thou hast heard me"--shows that he had girded himself for a supreme +effort by concentrating the utmost energy of his spirit in prayer. +Physically parallel with this was the intensity of voice put into his +call to the occupant of the tomb. This is better represented in the +original than in our translation: "He shouted with a great voice, +'Lazarus, come forth.'" The whole record indicates the utmost tension of +all his energies, and closely comports with the view that this stood to +the sequel in the relation of cause to effect.[24] Another circumstance +not without bearing on the case is the energizing power of the intense +sympathy with the bereaved family that stirred the soul of Jesus to weep +and groan with them. And it is not without significance that this strong +factor appears active in the larger number of the Biblical cases,--three +of them only children, two of these the children of the pitiable class +of widows. + +Peculiar, then, as was the case of Lazarus, our examination of it +reveals no substantial ground for insisting that it was essentially +unlike the previous case of the ruler's daughter, that it was the +bringing back into a decaying body of a spirit that had entered into the +world of departed souls. The actual fact, of course, is indemonstrable. +Our conclusion has to be formed wholly upon the probabilities of the +case, and must be formed in a reasonable choice between the greater +probability and the less. + +The restoration of Dorcas to life by Peter, recorded in the book of +Acts,[25] needs no special discussion beyond the various considerations +already adduced in this chapter. The case of Eutychus, recorded in the +same book,[26] requires mention only lest it should seem to have been +forgotten, as it is not in point at all. The record makes it highly +probable that the supposed death was nothing more than the loss of +consciousness for a few hours in consequence of a fall from the window. + + * * * * * + +If one should here suggest that no mention has yet been made of the +resurrection of Jesus himself, it must be pointed out that this is a +fact of a totally different kind from any of the foregoing cases. To +speak, as many do, of the "resurrection of Lazarus" is a misuse of +words. Resuscitation to life in this world, and resurrection, the rising +up of the released spirit into the life of the world to come, are as +distinct as are the worlds to which they severally belong. We here +consider only the _raisings_ which restored to the virtually dead their +interrupted mortal life. The _rising_ from the mortal into the immortal +state belongs to an entirely different field of study. + + * * * * * + +Apart, then, from traditional prepossessions, examination of the +Biblical narratives discloses nothing to invalidate the hypothesis which +one who is acquainted with the copious record of apparent but unreal +death must seriously and impartially consider. The reputedly miraculous +raisings of the "dead" related in both the Old and the New Testament +may, with entire reason, and without detriment to religion, be classed +with such as are related outside of the Scriptures, in ancient times as +well as modern, and as phenomena wholly within the natural order, +however extraordinary. The practical result of such a conclusion is +likely to be a gain for the historicity of the Scripture narratives in +the estimate of a large class of thoughtful minds. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[12] An objection to the historicity of the raising of Lazarus which is +made on the ground that so great a work, if historical, would have been +related by more than one of the Evangelists, yields on reflection the +possibility that Jesus may have effected more than the three raisings +recorded of him. John is the sole narrator of the raising of Lazarus. +But he omits notice of the two raisings recorded by the other +Evangelists, while Matthew and Mark do not record the raising of the +widow's son recorded by Luke. All this suggests that the record may have +preserved for us specimens rather than a complete list of this class of +miracles. (Compare John xxi. 25.) + +[13] "We have frequent cases of trance, ... where the parties seem to +die, but after a time the spirit returns, and life goes on as before. In +all this there is no miracle. Why may not the resuscitations in Christ's +time possibly have been similar cases? Is not this less improbable than +that the natural order of the universe should have been set +aside?"--_The Problem of Final Destiny_, by William B. Brown, D.D., +1899. + +[14] On account of the ceremonial "uncleanness" caused by the dead body. +See Numbers v. 2, and many similar passages. + +[15] _Buried Alive_ (Universal Truth Publishing Co., Chicago). See also +_Premature Burial_, by D. Walsh (William Wood & Co., New York), and +_Premature Burial_, by W. Tebb and E. P. Vollum (New Amsterdam Book Co., +New York). + +[16] Other writers might be mentioned, as Mme. Necker (1790), Dr. Vigne +(1841). Yet on the other hand it is alleged, that "none of the numerous +stories of this dreadful accident which have obtained credence from time +to time seem to be authentic" (_American Cyclopedia_, art. "Burial"). +Allowing a wide margin for exaggeration and credulity, there is +certainly a residuum of fact. A correspondent of the (London) +_Spectator_ a few years since testified to a distressing case in his own +family. + +[17] Kings xvii. 17-23. + +[18] Kings iv. 32-36. + +[19] Mark v. 35-43. + +[20] Luke vii. 12-16. + +[21] John xi. 11-44. + +[22] Was Jesus aware that Lazarus was really not dead? It is impossible +to reach a positive conclusion. In some directions his knowledge was +certainly limited. That he was not aware of the reality might be +inferred from his seeming to have allowed his act to pass for what, in +the view of it here suggested, it was not,--the recall to life of one +actually dead. This, however, assumes the completeness of a record whose +silence on this point cannot be pressed as conclusive. It is, indeed, +unlikely that Jesus knew all that medical men now know. But awareness of +any fact may be in varying degrees from serious suspicion up to positive +certitude. While far from positiveness, awareness may exist in a degree +that gives courage for resolute effort resulting in clear and full +verification. Jesus may have been ignorant of the objective reality of +Lazarus's condition, and yet have been very hopeful of being empowered +by the divine aid he prayed for (John xi. 41) to cope with it +successfully. + +[23] See pages 28, 29, Note. + +[24] Jesus' works of healing are explicitly attributed by the +Evangelists to a peculiar power that issued from him. In Mark v. 30, +Luke vi. 19, and viii. 46, the original word _dunamis_, which the +Authorized Version translates "virtue," is more correctly rendered +"power" in the Revised Version. Especially noticeable is the peculiar +phraseology of Mark v. 30: "Jesus perceiving in himself that the power +proceeding from him had gone forth (R. V.)." The peculiar circumstances +of the case suggest that the going forth of this power might be motived +sub-consciously, as well as by conscious volition. + +[25] Acts ix. 36-42. + +[26] Acts xx. 9-13. + + + + +IV + + + + +IV + + SYNOPSIS.--A clearer conception of miracle approached.--Works of + Jesus once reputed miraculous not so reputed now, since not now + transcending, as once, the existing range of knowledge and + power.--This transfer of the miraculous to the natural likely to + continue.--No hard and fast line between the miraculous and the + non-miraculous.--Miracle a provisional word, its application + narrowing in the enlarging mastery of the secrets of nature and + life. + + +At this point it seems possible to approach a clearer understanding of +the proper meaning to attach to the generally ill-defined and hazy term +_miracle_.[27] Matthew Arnold's fantastic illustration of the idea of +miracle by supposing a pen changed to a pen-wiper may fit some miracles, +especially those of the Catholic hagiology, but, if applied to those of +Jesus, would be a caricature. In the New Testament a reputed miracle is +not any sort of wonderful work upon any sort of occasion, but an act of +benevolent will exerted for an immediate benefit,[28] and transcending +the then existing range of human intelligence to explain and power to +achieve. The historic reality of at least some such acts performed by +Jesus is acknowledged by critics as free from the faintest trace of +orthodox bias as Keim: "The picture of Jesus, the worker of miracles, +belongs to the first believers in Christ, and is no invention." + +It has already been noted that a considerable number of the then reputed +miracles of Jesus, particularly his works of healing, do not now, as +then, transcend the existing range of knowledge and power, and +accordingly are no longer reputed miraculous. And one cannot reasonably +believe that a limit to the understanding and control of forces in +Nature and mind that now are more or less occult has been already +reached. It is, therefore, not incredible that some of the mighty works +of Jesus, which still transcend the existing limits of knowledge and +power, and so are still reputed miraculous, and are suspected by many as +unhistorical, may in some yet remote and riper stage of humanity be +transferred, as some have already been, to the class of the +non-miraculous and natural. + +Dr. Robbins, Dean of the General Theological Seminary, New York, after +remarking that "the word _miracle_ has done more to introduce confusion +into Christian Evidences than any other," goes on to say: "To animals +certain events to them inexplicable are signs of the presence of human +intelligence and power. To men these miracles of Christ are signs of +divine intelligence and power. But how is miracle to be differentiated +from other providential dealings of God? Not by removing him further +from common events. Abstruse speculations concerning the relation of +miracles to other physical phenomena may be safely left to the +adjustment of an age which shall have advanced to a more perfect +synthesis of knowledge than the present can boast."[29] + +The truth to which such considerations conduct is, that no hard and fast +line can be drawn between the miraculous and the non-miraculous. To the +untutored mind, like that of the savage who thought it miraculous that a +chip with a message written on it had talked to the recipient, the +simplest thing that he cannot explain is miraculous: "_omne ignotum pro +mirifico_," said Tacitus. As the range of knowledge and power widens, +the range of the miraculous narrows correspondingly. Some twenty years +since, the International Sunday-school Lessons employed as a proof of +the divinity of Christ the reputedly miraculous knowledge which he +evinced in his first interview with Nathanael of a solitary hour in +Nathanael's experience.[30] Since then it has been demonstrated[31] by +psychical research that the natural order of the world includes +telepathy, and the range of the miraculous has been correspondingly +reduced without detriment to the argument for the divinity of Christ, +now rested on less precarious ground. + +Under such conditions as we have reviewed a miracle cannot always be one +and the same thing. Miracle must therefore be defined as being what our +whole course of thought has suggested that it is: in general, an elastic +word; in particular, a provisional word,--a word whose application +narrows with the enlarging range of human knowledge[32] and power which +for the time it transcends; a word whose history, in its record of +ranges already transcended, prompts expectation that ranges still beyond +may be transcended in the illimitable progress of mankind. Professor Le +Conte says that miracle is "an occurrence or a phenomenon according to a +law higher than any yet known." Thus it is a case of human ignorance, +not of divine interference. + +On the other hand, we must believe that the goal of progress is a flying +goal; that human attainment can never reach finality unless men cease to +be. And so all widening of human knowledge and power must ever disclose +further limitations to be transcended. There will always be a _Beyond_, +in which dwells the secret of laws still undiscovered, that underlie +mysteries unrevealed and marvels unexplained. This will have to be +admitted, especially, by those to whom the marvellous is synonymous +with the incredible. We have not been able to eviscerate even these +prosaic and matter-of-fact modern times of marvels whose secret lies in +the yet uncatalogued or indefinable powers of the mysterious agent that +we name _life_: witness many well verified facts recorded by the Society +for Psychical Research.[33] How, then, is it consistent to affirm that +no such marvels in ancient records are historical realities? Nay, may it +not be true that the ancient days of seers and prophets, the days of +Jesus, days of the sublime strivings of great and lonely souls for +closer converse with the Infinite Spirit behind his mask of Nature, +offered better conditions for marvellous experiences and deeds than +these days of scientific laboratories and factories, and world-markets +and world-politics? + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[27] "Early and mediaeval theologians agree in conceiving the miraculous +as being above, not contrary to, nature. The question entered on a new +phase when Hume defined a miracle as a violation of nature, and asserted +the impossibility of substantiating its actual occurrence. The modern +discussion has proceeded largely in view of Hume's destructive +criticism. Assuming the possibility of a miracle, the questions of fact +and of definition remain."--_Dictionary of Psychology._ + +"When we find the definition for which we are searching, the miraculous +will no longer be a problem."--PROFESSOR W. SANDAY, at the Anglican +Church Congress, 1902. + +[28] For exceptions see Matthew xxi. 19; Acts xiii. 10, 11. + +[29] _A Christian Apologetic_, p. 97. + +[30] John i. 47-50. + +[31] In the opinion of such psychologists as Professor William James, of +Harvard, the late Professor Henry Sidgwick, of Cambridge, England, and +others of like eminence. + +[32] A hint of this was given by Augustine: "Portentum non fit contra +naturam, sed contra quam est nota natura."--_De Civitate Dei._ + +[33] Consult the late F. W. H. Myers's remarkable volumes on _Human +Personality and Survival after Death_ (Longmans, Green & Co.). + + + + +V + + + + +V + + SYNOPSIS.--Biblical miracles the effluence of extraordinary + lives.--Life the world's magician and miracle worker; its miracles + now termed _prodigies_.--Miracle the natural product of an + extraordinary endowment of life.--Life the ultimate reality.--What + any man can achieve is conditioned by the psychical quality of his + life.--Nothing more natural, more supernatural, than life.--The + derived life of the world filial to the self-existent life of God, + "begotten, not made."--Miracle, as the product of life, the work of + God. + + +Be it noted, now, that the marvellous phenomena of the Biblical record, +whatever else be thought of them, are, even to a superficial view, the +extraordinary effluence of extraordinary lives. Here at length we gain a +clearer conception of miracle. _Life_ is the world's great +magician,--life, so familiar, yet so mysterious; so commonplace, yet so +transcendent. No miracle is more marvellous than its doings witnessed in +the biological laboratory, or more inexplicable than its transformation +of dead matter into living flesh, its development of a Shakespeare from +a microscopic bit of protoplasm. But its mysterious processes are too +common for general marvel; we marvel only at the uncommon. The boy Zerah +Colburn in half a minute solved the problem, "How many seconds since the +beginning of the Christian era?" We prefer to call this a prodigy rather +than a miracle,--a distinction more verbal than real; and we fancy we +have explained it when we say that such arithmetical power was a +peculiar endowment of his mental life. Now all of the inexplicable, +inimitable reality that at any time has to be left by the baffled +intellect as an unsolved wonder under the name of miracle is just +that,--_the natural product of an extraordinary endowment of life_. More +of its marvellous capability is latent in common men, in the +subconscious depths of being, than has ever yet flashed forth in the +career of uncommon men. Some scientists say that it depends on chemical +and physical forces. It indeed uses these to build the various bodies it +inhabits, but again it leaves these to destroy those bodies when it +quits them. The most constant and ubiquitous phenomenon in the world, +the ultimate reality in the universe, is _life_, revealing its presence +in innumerable modes of activity, from the dance of atoms in the rock to +the philosophizing of the sage and the aspirations of the saint,--the +creator of Nature, the administrator of the regular processes we call +the laws of Nature, the author of the wonders men call miraculous +because they are uncommon and ill understood. + +The works of which any man is naturally capable are conditioned by the +psychical quality of his life, and its power to use the forces of +Nature. Through differences of vital endowment some can use color, as +wonderful painters, and others employ sound, as wonderful musicians, in +ways impossible to those otherwise endowed. So "a poet is born, not +made." So persons of feeble frame, stimulated by disease or frenzied by +passion, have put forth preternatural and prodigious muscular strength. +By what we call "clairvoyant" power life calls up in intelligent +perception things going on far beyond ocular vision. By what we call +"telepathic" power life communicates intelligence with life separated by +miles of space. Such are some of the powers that have been discovered, +and fully attested, but not explained, as belonging to the world's +master magician, _Life_. And when the poet asks,-- + + "Ah, what will our children be, + The men of a hundred thousand, a million summers away?" + +we can only answer with the Apostle: "It doth not yet appear what we +shall be." But we cannot deem it likely that the powers of life, + + "Deep seated in our mystic frame," + +and giving forth such flashes of their inherent virtue, have already +reached their ultimate development. + +We look with wonder and awe into the secret shrine of life, where two +scarcely visible cells unite to form the human being whose thought shall +arrange the starry heavens in majestic order, and harness the titanic +energies of Nature for the world's work. There we behold the real +supernatural. Nothing is more natural than life, and nothing also more +supernatural. Biology studies all the various forms that the world shows +of it, and affirms that life, though multiform, is one. This embryology +attests, showing that the whole ascent of life through diverse forms +from the lowest to the highest, during the millions of years since life +first manifested its presence on this globe, is recapitulated in the +stages of growth through which the human being passes in the few months +before its birth. And philosophy, which does not seek the living among +the dead, affirms, _omne vivum ex vivo_. The varied but unitary life of +the world is the stream of an exhaustless spring. It is filial to the +life of God, the Father Almighty. What the ancient creed affirmed of the +Christ as the Son of God--whom his beloved disciple recognized as "the +eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested unto +us[34]"--may be truly affirmed of the mysterious reality that is known +as life: "Begotten not made; being of one substance with the Father; +through whom [or which] all things were made." Looking from the derived +and finite life of the world, visible only in the signs of its presence, +but in its reality no more visible than him "whom no man hath seen, nor +can see," up to the life underived, aboriginal, infinite, we recognize +_God_ and _Life_ as terms of identical significance. How superficial the +notion of miracles as "the personal intervention of God into the chain +of cause and effect," in which he is the constant vital element. If an +event deemed miraculous is ever ascribed, as of old, to "the finger of +God," the reality behind the phenomenon is simply a higher or a stronger +power of life than is recognized in an event of a common type--life that +is one with the infinite and universal Life, + + "Life that in me has rest, + As I, undying Life, have power in Thee." + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[34] 1 John i. 2. + + + + +VI + + + + +VI + + SYNOPSIS.--The question, both old and new, now confronting + theologians.--Their recent retreat upon the minimum of miracle.--The + present conflict of opinion in the Church.--Its turning-point + reached in the antipodal turn-about in the treatment of miracles + from the old to the new apologetics.--Revision of the traditional + idea of the supernatural required for theological readjustment. + + +The present line of thought has now reached the point where an important +question confronts us,--a question not wholly new. Within the memory of +living men theologians have been compelled to ask themselves: What if +the geologists should establish facts that contradict our Biblically +derived doctrine that the universe was made in a week? Again have they +been constrained to put to themselves the question: What if the +evolutionists should supersede our doctrine that the creation is the +immediate product of successive fiats of the Creator by showing that it +came gradually into existence through the progressive operation of +forces immanent in the cosmos? Still again have they had to face the +question: What if modern criticism by the discovery of demonstrable +errors in the Sacred Writings should fault our doctrine that, as the +Word of God, the Bible is free from all and every error? In every +instance the dreaded concession, when found at length to be enforced by +modern learning, has been found to bring, not the loss that had been +apprehended, but clear gain to the intellectual interests of religion. +Now it is this same sort of question which returns with the +uncertainties and difficulties widely felt in the Church to be gathering +over its hitherto unvexed belief in miracles as signs of a divine +activity more immediate than it has recognized in the regular processes +of Nature. + +The majority of uneducated Christians still hold, as formerly in each of +the points just mentioned, to the traditional view. Miracle as a divine +intervention in the natural order, a more close and direct divine +contact with the course of things than is the case in ordinary +experience, they regard as the inseparable and necessary concomitant and +proof of a divine Revelation. To deny miracles, thus understood, is +censured as equivalent to denial of the reality of the Revelation. But +it is rather surprising, because it is rare, to find a man of such note +in literature as Dr. W. Robertson Nicoll affirming[35] that one cannot +be a Christian without believing at least two miracles, the virgin +birth and the physical resurrection of the Christ. Without comment on +the significance of this retreat upon the minimum of miracle, it must +here be noted that a minority of the Church, not inferior to their +brethren in learning and piety, believe that there are no tides in God's +presence in Nature, that his contact with it is always of the closest:-- + + "Closer is he than breathing, and nearer than hands or feet." + +All natural operations are to them divine operations. "Nature," said Dr. +Martineau, "is God's mask, not his competitor." While his agency in +Nature may be _recognized_ at one time more than at another, it _exists_ +at any time fully as much as at any other. In the interest of this +fundamental truth of religion they affirm that miracles in the +traditional sense of the word, and in their traditional limitation to +the small measure of time and space covered by Biblical narratives, +never occurred. Events reputed miraculous have indeed occurred, but +simply as unusual, inexplicable phenomena in the natural order of +things, the natural products of exceptionally endowed life, and, whether +in ancient time or modern, the same sort of thing the world over. To the +argument that this involves denial of a supernatural Revelation they +reply that it is mere reasoning in a circle. For if one begs the +question at the outset by defining supernatural Revelation as revelation +necessarily evidenced by miraculous divine intervention, then, of +course, denial of this is denial of that, and how is the argument +advanced? But, besides this, the question-begging definition is a +fallacious confusing of the contents of the Revelation with its +concomitants, and of its essentially spiritual character with phenomena +in the sphere of the senses. + +The turning-point in this argument between the two parties in the Church +has been reached in the antipodal change, already referred to, from the +old to the new apologetics,--a change whose inevitable consequences do +not yet seem to be clearly discerned by either party in the discussion. +The contention that denial of miracles as traditionally understood +carries denial of supernatural Revelation has been virtually set aside, +with its question-begging definition and circular reasoning, by the +apologetics now current among believers in at least a minimum of miracle +in the traditional sense of the word,--especially in the two chief +miracles of the virgin birth and the physical resurrection of Jesus. As +an eminent representative of these the late Dr. A. B. Bruce may be +cited. These adduce "the moral miracle," the sinlessness of Jesus, as +evidential for the reality of the physical miracles as its "congruous +accompaniments." "If," says Dr. Bruce, "we receive Him as the great +moral miracle, we shall receive much more for His sake."[36] But what a +turn-about of the traditional argument on the evidences! The older +apologetes argued: This crown of miraculous power bespeaks the royal +dignity of the wearer. The modern apologete reasons: This royal +character must have a crown of miraculous power corresponding with his +moral worth. In this antipodal reverse of Christian thought it is quite +plain that for evidential purposes the miracle is stripped of its +ancient value. And it has already been observed that modern knowledge +has now transferred many of the Biblical miracles to the new rooms +discovered for them in the natural order of things. It is not premature, +therefore, for leaders of Christian thought to put once more to +themselves the question, constantly recurring as learning advances: +What theological readjustment should we have to make, if obliged to +concede that the ancient belief in miracle is not inseparable from +belief in a supernatural Revelation, not indispensable to belief +therein? What modified conception must we form, if constrained to admit +that the living God, ever immanent in Nature, intervenes in Nature no +more at one time than another? What, indeed, but a revised and true in +place of a mistaken conception of the term _Supernatural_? + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[35] "The Church asks, and it is entitled to ask the critic: Do you +believe in the Incarnation and Resurrection of Jesus Christ?... If he +replies in the negative, he has missed the way, and has put himself +outside of the Church of Christ."--_The Church's One Foundation_, p. 4. +[Note that "Incarnation" and "Resurrection" are terms which Dr. Nicoll +construes as denoting physical miracles.] + +What Dr. Nicoll here means by "outside of the Church" he indicates by +saying elsewhere, that philosophers who reckon goodness as everything, +and miracles as impossible, "are not Christians" (_op. cit._, p. 10). + +This conditioning of Christian character upon an intellectual judgment +concerning the reality of remote occurrences is both unbiblical and +unethical, as well as absurd when practically applied. Some years since, +Dr. E. A. Abbott, who admits no miracle in the life of Christ, published +a book, _The Spirit on the Waters_, in which he inculcated the worship +of Christ. Yet, according to Dr. Nicoll, such a man is no Christian! + +[36] _The Miraculous Element in the Gospels_, p. 353. + + + + +VII + + + + +VII + + SYNOPSIS.--Account to be made of the law of atrophy through + disuse.--The virgin birth and the corporeal resurrection of Jesus, + the two miracles now insisted on as the irreducible minimum, + affected by this law.--The vital truths of the incarnation and + immortality independent of these miracles.--These truths now placed + on higher ground in a truer conception of the supernatural.--The + true supernatural is the spiritual, not the miraculous.--Scepticism + bred from the contrary view.--The miracle narratives, while less + evidential for religion, not unimportant for history.--Psychical + research a needful auxiliary for the scientific critic of these. + + +To the true conception of the supernatural we shall presently come. But +we cannot proceed without briefly reminding ourselves of the certain +consequences of this now far advanced dropping of miracles by modern +apologetics from their ancient use as evidences of a supernatural +Revelation. We are not ignorant of the law, which holds throughout the +material, the mental, and the moral realms, that disuse tends to atrophy +and extinction. Disused organs cease to exist, as in the eyeless +cave-fish. For centuries the story of the miraculous birth of Jesus was +serviceable for confirmation of his claim to be the Son of God. In the +address of the angel of the annunciation to Mary that claim is expressly +rested on the miraculous conception of "the holy thing."[37] But as +ethical enlightenment grows, the conviction grows that, whether the +physiological ground of that claim be tenable or not, the ethical ground +of it is essentially higher. _Father_ and _son_ even in human +relationships are terms of more than physiological import. It is matter +of frequent experience that, where the ethical character of such +relationship is lacking, the physiological counts for nothing. +Moreover, the divine sonship of Jesus in a purely ethical view rests on +ground not only higher but incontestable. And so in our time theologians +prefer to rest it on foundations that cannot be shaken, on his moral +oneness with God, the divineness of his spirit, the ideal perfectness of +his life. The strength of this position being realized, the world begins +to hear from Christian thinkers the innovating affirmation that belief +of the miraculous birth can no longer be deemed essential to +Christianity; else it would not have been left unmentioned in two of the +four Gospels, and in every extant Apostolic letter. And now we hear +theologians saying: "I accept it, but I place it no more among the +evidences of Christianity. I defend it, but cannot employ it in the +defence of supernatural Revelation." Such a stage of thought is only +transitional. An antiquated argument does not long survive in the world +of thought.[38] Military weapons that have become unserviceable soon +find their way either to the museum or the foundry. It is shortsighted +not to foresee the inevitable effect on our theological material of the +law of atrophy through disuse. The case of the miracle is the case of a +pillar originally put in for the support of an ancient roof. When the +roof has a modern truss put beneath it springing from wall to wall, the +pillar becomes an obstacle, and is removed. + +But as in such a case the roof, otherwise supported, does not fall in +when the pillar is removed, so neither is the central Christian truth of +the incarnation imperilled by any weakening or vanishing of belief in +the doctrine of the virgin birth. In a discussion of the subject in +Convocation at York, England, while these pages were being written, the +Dean of Ripon (Dr. Boyd Carpenter) urged that it must be borne in mind +that the incarnation and the virgin birth were two different things, and +that some who found difficulty in the latter fully accepted the former. +In a recent sermon Dr. Briggs insists likewise upon this: "The virgin +birth is only one of many statements of the mode of incarnation.... The +doctrine of the incarnation does not depend upon the virgin birth.... It +is only a minor matter connected with the incarnation, and should have a +subordinate place in the doctrine.... At the same time the virgin birth +is a New Testament doctrine, and we must give it its proper place and +importance.... The favorite idea of the incarnation among the people has +ever been the simpler one of the virgin birth, as in the Ave Maria. The +theologians have ever preferred the more profound doctrine of the Hymn +of the Logos [John i. 1-18]."[39] Nay, it may even be found that the +weakening of belief in the incarnation as an isolated and miraculous +event may tend to promote a profounder conception of it, that brings the +divine and the human into touch and union at all points instead of in +one point.[40] + +A similar change of thought, less remarked than its significance +deserves, is concerned with that other great miracle, the corporeal +resurrection of Jesus, which such writers as Dr. Nicoll couple with that +of his virgin birth as the irreducible minimum of miracle, belief in +which is essential to Christian discipleship.[41] For many centuries the +resurrection story in the Gospels has served as the conclusive proof +both of the divine sonship of Jesus,[42] and of our own resurrection to +immortality.[43] In the churches it is still popularly regarded as the +supreme, sufficient, and indispensable fact required for the basis of +faith. But in many a Christian mind the thought has dawned, that a +single fact cannot give adequate ground for the general inference of a +universal principle; that a remote historical fact, however strongly +attested, can evince only what _has_ taken place in a given case, not +what _will_ or _must_ occur in other cases; while it is also inevitably +more or less pursued by critical doubt of the attestations supporting +it. + +This rising tide of reflection has compelled resort to higher ground, to +the inward evidences in the nature of mind that are more secure from the +doubt to which all that is merely external and historical is exposed. A +clear distinction has been discerned between the _real_ resurrection of +Jesus--his rising from the mortal state into the immortal, and his +_phenomenal_ resurrection--the manifestations of his change that are +related as having been objectively witnessed. What took place in the +invisible world--his real resurrection--is now more emphasized by +Christian thinkers than the phenomenal resurrection in the visible +world. So conservatively orthodox a writer as Dr. G. D. Boardman goes so +far as to say: "After all, the real question in the matter of his +resurrection is not, 'Did Christ's body rise?' That is but a +subordinate, incidental issue." The real question, as Dr. Boardman +admits, is, "Whether Jesus Christ himself is risen, and is alive +to-day."[44] The main stress of Christian thought to-day is not laid, as +formerly, on the phenomena recorded in the story of the resurrection, +but on the psychological, moral, and rational evidences of a +resurrection to immortality that until recent times were comparatively +disregarded.[45] Meanwhile the vindication of the reality of the +phenomena related of the risen Jesus, including his bodily ascension, +though not a matter of indifference to many of those who have found the +higher grounds of faith, has become to them of subordinate importance. + +It is well for Christian faith that its supersensuous and impregnable +grounds have been occupied. It is certain that ancient records of +external phenomena cannot in future constitute, as heretofore, the +stronghold of faith. But it is by no means yet certain that they have +lost serviceableness as, at least, outworks of the stronghold. While the +doctrine of the virgin birth seems to be threatened by atrophy, the +doctrine of the bodily resurrection, though retired from primary to +secondary rank, seems to be waiting rather for clarification by further +knowledge. + +Something of an objective nature certainly lies at its basis; +_something_ of an external sort, not the product of mere imagination, +took place. To the fact thus indefinitely stated, that hallowing of +Sunday as a day of sacred and joyful observance which is coeval with the +earliest traditions, and antedates all records, is an attestation as +significant as any monumental marble. No hallucination theory, no +gradual rise and growth of hope in the minds of a reflective few, can +account for that solid primeval monument. But _what_ occurred, the +reality in distinctness from any legendary accretions, we shall be +better able to conclude, when the truth shall have been threshed out +concerning the reality, at present strongly attested, and as strongly +controverted, of certain extraordinary but occult psychical powers.[46] + +A point of high significance for those who would cultivate a religious +faith not liable to be affected by changes of intellectual outlook or +insight is, that this lower valuation of miracle observable among +Christian thinkers has not been reached through breaches made by +sceptical doubts of the reality of a supernatural Revelation. They +have, of course, felt the reasonableness of the difficulties with which +traditional opinions have been encumbered by the advance of knowledge. +But so far from giving way thereupon to doubts of the reality of divine +Revelation, they have sought and found less assailable defences for +their faith in it than those that sufficed their fathers. And their +satisfaction therewith stands in no sympathy with those who hold it a +mark of enlightenment to assume with Matthew Arnold, that "miracles do +not happen." It has resulted rather from reaching the higher grounds of +religious thought, on which supernatural Revelation is recognized in its +essential character as distinctively moral and spiritual. + +The true supernatural is the _spiritual_, not the miraculous, a higher +order of Nature, not a contradiction of Nature. The Revelation of Jesus +was altogether spiritual. It consisted in the ideas of God which he +communicated by his ministry and teaching, by his character and life. +But this, the real supernatural, was not obvious as such to his +contemporaries. They looked for it in the lower region of physical +effects. And here the Church also in its embryonic spiritual life, in +its proneness to externalize religion in forms of rite, and creed, and +organization, has thought to find it. Jesus' reproof, "Except ye see +signs and wonders ye will not believe," is still pertinent to those who +will not have it that the supernatural Revelation--spiritual though it +be--can be recognized or believed in apart from an acknowledgment of +attendant miracles, wrought in physical nature by an intervention of +God. Such a contention, however, is as futile and desperate as was John +Wesley's declaration, "The giving up of witchcraft is in effect the +giving up of the Bible." Such mischievous fallacies succeed only in +blinding many a mind to the real issue which the moral and spiritual +Revelation of Jesus makes with men of the twentieth century. It is these +fallacies, and not their critics, that create the most of +scepticism.[47] + +But while the question whether miracles are credible has ceased to be of +vital importance, it has by no means lost all importance. On the +contrary, so long as the path of progress is guided by the lamp of +experience, so long will it be of consequence that the historical record +of experience be found trustworthy. It may suit the overweening pride +which defies both the past and the present to say with Bonaparte, that +history is only a fable that men have agreed to believe. But it is a +human interest, and a satisfaction of normal minds to establish, so far +as reason permits, the credibility of every record ostensibly historic. +To discover that ancient experiences, once supposed to be miraculous +raisings from real death, may reasonably be classed with well attested +experiences of to-day, better understood as resuscitations from a +deathlike trance, should be welcomed by unprejudiced historical critics, +as redeeming portions of the ancient record from mistaken disparagement +as legendary. That further study may accredit as facts, or at least as +founded on facts, some other marvels in that record cannot, except by +arrant dogmatism, be pronounced improbable. Nevertheless, it cannot be +expected that the legendary element, which both the Old and the New +Testament in greater and less degree exhibit, can ever be eliminated. +Such stories as that of the origin of languages at Babel, and that of +the resurrection of ancient saints at Jesus' resurrection are +indubitable cases of it. But the legendary element, though permanent, is +at present undefined. To define it is the problem of the critical +student, a problem most difficult to him whose judgment is least +subjective; and he will welcome every contribution that advancing +knowledge can supply. + +Regarding miracle as the natural product of exceptionally endowed life, +there is no source from which more light can be shed on its Biblical +record than in those studies of the exceptional phenomena and occult +powers of life which are prosecuted by the Society for Psychical +Research, whose results are recorded in its published _Proceedings_. For +those familiar with this record the legendary element in the Bible tends +to shrink into smaller compass than many critics assign it. In the +interest both of the Bible and of science it is regrettable that the +results of these researches, though conducted by men of high eminence +in the scientific world, still encounter the same hostile scepticism +even from some Christian believers that Hume directed against the +Biblical miracles. Mr. Gladstone has put himself on record against this +philistinism, saying that "psychical research is by far the most +important work that is being done in the world." Were one disposed to +prophesy, very reasonable grounds could be produced for the prediction +that, great as was the advance of the nineteenth century in physical +knowledge, the twentieth century will witness an advance in psychical +knowledge equally great. In this advance one may not unreasonably +anticipate that some, at least, of the Biblical miracles may be relieved +from the scepticism that now widely discredits them. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[37] Luke i. 35. + +[38] To what extent the law of atrophy has begun to work upon the +doctrine of the virgin birth appears in the recent utterance of so +eminent an evangelical scholar as Dr. R. F. Horton, of London. The +following report of his remarks in a Christmas sermon in 1901 is taken +from the _Christian World_, London. "We could not imagine Paul, Peter, +and John all ignoring something essential to the Gospel they preached. +Strictly speaking, this narrative in Matthew and Luke was one of the +latest touches in the Gospel, belonging to a period forty or fifty years +after the Lord had passed away, when men had begun to realize what he +was--the Son of God--and tried to express their conviction in this form +or that." The implication here is unmistakable, that, in Dr. Horton's +view, subjective considerations in the minds of pious believers, rather +than objective fact, form the basis of the story. + +[39] See the Sermon on "Born of a Virgin," in the volume on _The +Incarnation of Our Lord_. + +[40] "Christian thought has not erred by asserting too much concerning +the incarnation of God, but, on the contrary, too little.... If ever +overblown by blasts of denial, it is for wanting breadth of base.... Men +have disbelieved the incarnation, because told that all there was of it +was in Christ; and they reject what is presented as exceptional to the +general way of God. They must be told to believe more; that the age-long +way of God is in a perpetually increasing incarnation of life, whose +climax and crown is the divine fulness of life in Christ."--From a +discourse by the present writer on "Life and its Incarnations," in the +volume, _New Points to Old Texts_. (James Clarke & Co., London. Thomas +Whittaker, New York, 1889.) + +[41] See page 97 and Note. + +[42] Romans i. 4. + +[43] 1 Corinthians xv. 16-23. + +[44] _Our Risen King's Forty Days_, 1902. + +[45] In strong contrast with this are the reactionary protests of Dr. W. +R. Nicoll: "To talk of the resurrection of the spirit is preposterous. +The spirit does not die, and therefore cannot rise.... The one +resurrection of which the New Testament knows, the one resurrection +which allows to language any meaning, is the resurrection of the body, +the resurrection which leaves the grave empty" (_op. cit._ p. 134). + +It should be noted here that Jesus' argument with the Sadducees on the +resurrection (Luke xx. 37, 38) logically proceeds on the assumption that +living after death and rising after death are convertible terms. Also, +that the contrast involved in the idea of the resurrection (the +_anastasis_, or rising up) is a contrast not between the grave and the +sky, but between the lower life of mortals and the higher life immortal. + +For an extended exhibition of this line of evidence see "The Assurance +of Immortality," and "The Present Pledge of Life to Come" (in two +volumes of discourses by the present writer), London, James Clarke & Co. +New York, Thomas Whittaker, 1888 and 1889. + +[46] Could it have been only an apparition? The "census of +hallucinations" conducted some ten years since by the Society for +Psychical Research evinced the reality of veridical apparitions of +deceased persons at or near the time of their death, showing the number +of verified cases to be so large as to exclude the supposition of chance +hallucination (see _Proceedings_, August, 1894). Or could it have been a +material body suddenly becoming visible in a closed room, as narrated by +Luke and John? First-class evidence, if there can be any such for such +occurrences, has been exhibited for such phenomena as the passage of +solid substances through intervening doors and walls--easy enough, say +mathematicians, for a being familiar with the "fourth dimension"--and of +the levitation of heavy bodies without physical support. (See +_Proceedings_, January, 1894, and March, 1895.) As to such things +scepticism is doubtless in order, but dogmatic contradiction is not. +_Sub judice lis est._ + +[47] Professor Borden P. Bowne has thus exhibited this great mistake and +its grievous consequence:-- + +"In popular thought, religious and irreligious alike, the natural is +supposed to be something that runs itself without any internal guidance +or external interference. The supernatural, on the other hand, if there +be any such thing, is not supposed to manifest itself through the +natural, but by means of portents, prodigies, interpositions, departures +from, or infractions of, natural law in general. The realm of law +belongs to the natural, and the natural runs itself. Hence, if we are to +find anything supernatural, we must look for it in the abnormal, the +chaotic, the lawless, or that which defies all reduction to order that +may be depended on. This notion underlies the traditional debate between +naturalism and supernaturalism.... This unhappy misconception of the +relation of the natural to the supernatural has practically led the +great body of uncritical thinkers into the grotesque inversion of all +reason--the more law and order, the less God."--_Zion's Herald_, August +22, 1900. + + + + +VIII + + + + +VIII + + SYNOPSIS.--The cardinal point in the present discussion, the reality + not of miracles but of the supernatural.--Fallacy of pointing to + physical events as essential characteristics of supernatural + Revelation.--The character of a revelation determined not by its + circumstances, but by its contents.--Moral nature supernatural to + physical.--Nature a hierarchy of natures.--Supernatural Religion + historically attested by the moral development it + generates.--Transfer of its distinctive note from moral ideals to + physical marvels a costly error.--Jesus' miracles _a_ revelation, of + a type common with others before and since.--The unique Revelation + of Jesus was in the higher realm of divine ideas and ideals.--These, + while unrealized in human life, still exhibit the fact of a + supernatural Revelation.--The distinction of natural and + supernatural belongs to the period of moral progress up to the + spiritual maturity of man in the image of God. The divine + possibilities of humanity, imaged in Jesus, revealed as our + inheritance and our prize. + + +It remains finally to emphasize the point of cardinal importance in the +considerations that have been presented. This is not the reality of +miracles, but the reality of the supernatural, what it really is, as +distinct from what it has been thought to be. The advance of science and +philosophy has brought to the front this question: "Have those who +reject the claims of supernatural Religion been misinformed as to what +it is?" Is it, as they have been told, dependent for its attestation on +signs and wonders occurring in the sphere of the senses? Does it require +acceptance of these, as well as of its teachings? Or is its +characteristic appeal wholly to the higher nature of man, relying for +its attestation on the witness borne to it by this, rather than by +extraordinary phenomena presented to the senses? There is at present no +intellectual interest of Christianity more urgent than this: to present +to minds imbued with modern learning the true conception of the +supernatural and of supernatural Religion. + +Miracles, legitimately viewed as the natural product of extraordinary +psychical power, or, to phrase it otherwise, of an exceptional vital +endowment, belong not to the Hebrew race alone, nor did they cease when +the last survivor of the Jewish apostles of Christianity passed away at +the end of the first century. This traditional opinion ought by this +time to have been entombed together with its long defunct relative, +which represented this globe as the fixed centre of the revolving +heavens. Miracles have the same universality as human life. Nor will +their record be closed till the evolution of life is complete. Animal +life, advancing through geologic aeons to the advent of man, in him +reached its climax. Spiritual life, appearing in him as a new bud on an +old stock, is evidently far from its climax still. To believe in +miracles, as rightly understood, is to believe in spirit and life, and +in further unfoldings of their still latent powers. + +This, however, is just now of subordinate importance. The present +interest of chief moment is a riddance of the hoary fallacy that +vitiates the current idea of a supernatural Revelation by looking for +its specific characteristics to the physical world. By this deplorable +fallacy Christian theology has blinded the minds of many scientific men +to the essential claims of Christianity, with immense damage in the +arrested development of their religious nature through the scepticism +inevitably but needlessly provoked by this great mistake. When Elijah +proclaims to idolaters that their deity is no God, and, as we read, +corroborates his words by calling down fire from heaven to consume his +sacrifice, it is reckoned as supernatural Revelation. But it is not so +reckoned when the sage in the book of Proverbs proclaims to a nation of +religious formalists the moral character of God: "To do righteousness +and justice is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice." This is +accounted as ethical teaching, somewhat in advance of the times. A pagan +rather than a Christian way of thinking is discoverable here. In each of +the cases cited the specific character of supernatural Revelation is +equally evident,--the disclosure of spiritual truth above the natural +thought of the natural men to whom it came. The character of any +revelation is determined by the character of the truth made known, not +by the drapery of circumstances connected with the making known. Clothes +do not make the man, though coarse or careless people may think so. What +belongs to the moral and spiritual order is supernatural to what +belongs to the material and physical order. + +This way of thinking will be forced on common minds by thoughtful +observation of common things. Animate nature of the lowest rank, as in +the grass, is of a higher natural order than inanimate nature in the +soil the grass springs from. Sentient nature, as in the ox, is of a +higher order than the non-sentient in the grass. Self-conscious and +reflective nature in the man is of a higher order than the selfless and +non-reflective nature in his beast of burden. In the composite being of +man all these orders of nature coexist, and each higher is supernatural +to the nature below it. Nature, the comprehensive term for _all that +comes into being_, is a hierarchy of natures, rising rank above rank +from the lowest to the highest. The highest nature known to us, +supernatural to all below it, can only be the moral nature, whose full +satisfaction is necessary to the highest satisfaction of a man, and in +whose complete development only can be realized in permanency his +perfected welfare as a social being. + +Now it is precisely in the progress of moral development that +supernatural Religion manifests itself as a reality. Religion, indeed, +is as natural to man as Art. But there is religion and Religion, as +there is art and Art--the sexual religion of the primitive Semites, the +animistic religion of China, the spiritual Religion that flowered on the +Mount of the Beatitudes, embryonic religion and Religion adult; all, +indeed, natural, yet of lower and of higher grade. Doubtless, Religion +of whatever grade outranks all other human activities by its distinctive +aspiration to transcend the bounds of space and time and sense, and to +link the individual to the universal; and so all Religion sounds, feebly +or distinctly, the note of the supernatural. But this is the resonant +note of the spiritual Religion which unfolds in the moral progress of +the world. As moral nature is supernatural to the psychical and the +physical, so is its consummate bloom of spiritual Religion to be ranked +as such, relatively to the religions which more or less dimly and +blindly are yearning and groping toward the light that never was on sea +or land. Thus defining the word according to the nature of the thing, +supernatural Religion, with its corollary of supernatural Revelation not +as an apparition from without, but as an unfolding from within, is both +a fact and a factor in the development of spiritual man. + +The term _supernatural Religion_ has been rightly applied to that system +of religious conceptions, ideals, and motives, whose effective culture +of the moral nature is attested historically by a moral development +superior to the product of any other known religion. Whether the +greatest saints of Christianity are all of them whiter souls than any +that can be found among the disciples of any other religion, may be +matter for argument. There can be no gainsaying the fact that, of great +and lowly together, no other religion shows so many saints, or has so +advanced the general moral development in lands where it is widely +followed. But its essential character has been obscured, its appeal to +man's highest nature foiled, and its power lamed by the wretched fallacy +that has transferred its distinctive note of the supernatural from its +divine ideals to the physical marvels embedded in the record of its +original promulgation, even conditioning its validity and authority upon +their reality. Such is the false issue which, to the discredit of +Christianity, theology has presented to science. Such is the confusion +of ideas that in the light of modern knowledge inevitably blocks the way +to a reasonable religious faith in multitudes of minds thereby offended. +From this costly error Christian theology at length shows signs that it +is about to extricate itself.[48] + +As to the Christian miracles, there can be no reasonable doubt that +"mighty works," deemed by many of his contemporaries superhuman, were +wrought by Jesus. These, whatever they were, must be regarded as the +natural effluence of a transcendently endowed life. Taking place in the +sphere of the senses, they were _a_ revelation of the type seen before +and since in the lives of wonder-workers ancient and modern, in whom the +power of mind over matter, however astonishing and mysterious, is +recognized as belonging to the natural order of things no less than the +unexplored Antarctic belongs to the globe. But _the_ Revelation which he +gave to human thought as a new thing, a heavenly vision unprecedented, +was in the higher realm of the moral and spiritual life. This was the +true supernatural, whose reality and power are separable from all its +environment of circumstances, and wholly independent thereof. The +characteristic ideals of Jesus, his profound consciousness of God, his +filial thought of God, his saturation with the conviction of his moral +oneness with God,[49] his realization of brotherhood with the meanest +human being, still transcend the common level of natural humanity even +among his disciples. As thus transcendent they are supernatural still. +Till reached and realized, they manifest the fact of a supernatural +Revelation in that peerless life as plainly as the sun is manifest in +the splendor of a cloudless day. + +In the coming but distant age, when man's spiritual nature, now so +embryonic, shall have become adult, it will doubtless so pervade and +rule the physical and psychical natures which it inhabits that the +distinction between natural and supernatural, so important in the +period of its development, will become foreign alike to thought and +speech. But until the making of man in the image of God is complete, +when the spiritual element in our composite being, now struggling for +development, shall be manifest in its ultimate maturity and ascendency +as the distinctive and proper nature of humanity, it is of supreme +importance for the Christian teacher, who would point and urge to the +heights of being, to free men's minds of error as to what the real +supernatural is. Not the fancied disturber of the world's ordered +harmonies, but that highest Nature which is the moulder, the glory, and +the crown of all the lower. + +Imaged to us in the human perfectness of Jesus, the ideal Son of man, it +is revealed as the distinctive inheritance and prize of the humanity +that essays to think the thoughts and walk the ways of God. To each of +us is it given in germ by our human birth, to be fostered and nourished +in converse with the Infinite Presence that inhabits all things, till +its divine possibilities appear in the ultimate "revealing of the sons +of God,"[50] full grown "according to the measure of the stature of the +fulness of Christ."[51] + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[48] "Upon the conception of the supernatural as the personal," +says Professor Nash, "apologetics must found the claims of +Christianity."--_Ethics and Revelation._ + +[49] The words in which Jesus expresses this are much more extraordinary +and profoundly significant than any of those mighty works of his, the +like of which are recorded of the ancient prophets. Jesus was conscious +of God as living in him, and of himself as living in God, in the unity +of the one eternal life. Not merely as a man _of_ God, but as a man _in_ +God, as no other man has consciously been, does Jesus utter such sayings +as, "I am the light of the world," "I and my Father are one." (See +"Jesus the Ideal Man," by the present writer. _The New World_, June, +1897.) + +[50] Romans viii. 19. + +[51] Ephesians iv. 13. + + + + + New Testament Handbooks + + EDITED BY + + SHAILER MATHEWS + + _Professor of New Testament History and Interpretation, + University of Chicago_ + + + Arrangements are made for the following volumes, and the publishers + will, on request, send notice of the issue of each volume as it + appears and each descriptive circular sent out later; such requests + for information should state whether address is permanent or not:-- + + +THE HISTORY OF THE TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF THE NEW TESTAMENT + + Prof. MARVIN R. VINCENT, Professor of New Testament Exegesis, Union + Theological Seminary. [_Now ready._ + + Professor Vincent's contributions to the study of the New Testament + rank him among the first American exegetes. His most recent + publication is "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles + to the Philippians and to Philemon" (_International Critical + Commentary_), which was preceded by a "Students' New Testament + Handbook," "Word Studies in the New Testament," and others. + + +THE HISTORY OF THE HIGHER CRITICISM OF THE NEW TESTAMENT + + Prof. HENRY S. NASH, Professor of New Testament Interpretation, + Cambridge Divinity School. [_Now ready._ + + Of Professor Nash's "Genesis of the Social Conscience," _The + Outlook_ said: "The results of Professor Nash's ripe thought are + presented in a luminous, compact, and often epigrammatic style. The + treatment is at once masterful and helpful, and the book ought to be + a quickening influence of the highest kind; it surely will establish + the fame of its author as a profound thinker, one from whom we have + a right to expect future inspiration of a kindred sort." + + +INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT + + Prof. B. WISNER BACON, Professor of New Testament Interpretation, Yale + University. [_Now ready._ + + Professor Bacon's works in the field of Old Testament criticism + include "The Triple Tradition of Exodus," and "The Genesis of + Genesis," a study of the documentary sources of the books of Moses. + In the field of New Testament study he has published a number of + brilliant papers, the most recent of which is "The Autobiography of + Jesus," in the _American Journal of Theology_. + + +THE HISTORY OF NEW TESTAMENT TIMES IN PALESTINE + + Prof. SHAILER MATHEWS, Professor of New Testament History and + Interpretation, The University of Chicago. [_Now ready._ + + _The Congregationalist_ says of Prof. Shailer Mathews's recent work, + "The Social Teaching of Jesus": "Re-reading deepens the impression + that the author is scholarly, devout, awake to all modern thought, + and yet conservative and pre-eminently sane. If, after reading the + chapters dealing with Jesus' attitude toward man, society, the + family, the state, and wealth, the reader will not agree with us in + this opinion, we greatly err as prophets." + + +THE LIFE OF PAUL + + Prof. RUSH RHEES, President of the University of Rochester. + + Professor Rhees is well known from his series of "Inductive Lessons" + contributed to the _Sunday School Times_. His "Outline of the Life + of Paul," privately printed, has had a flattering reception from New + Testament scholars. + + +THE HISTORY OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE + + Dr. C. W. VOTAW, Instructor in New Testament Literature, The + University of Chicago. + + Of Dr. Votaw's "Inductive Study of the Founding of the Christian + Church," _Modern Church_, Edinburgh, says: "No fuller analysis of + the later books of the New Testament could be desired, and no better + programme could be offered for their study, than that afforded in + the scheme of fifty lessons on the _Founding of the Christian + Church_, by Clyde W. Votaw. It is well adapted alike for practical + and more scholarly students of the Bible." + + +THE TEACHING OF JESUS + + Prof. GEORGE B. STEVENS, Professor of Systematic Theology, Yale + University. [_Now ready._ + + Professor Stevens's volumes upon "The Johannine Theology," "The + Pauline Theology," as well as his recent volume on "The Theology of + the New Testament," have made him probably the most prominent writer + on biblical theology in America. His new volume will be among the + most important of his works. + + +THE BIBLICAL THEOLOGY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT + + Prof. E. P. GOULD, Professor of New Testament Interpretation, + Protestant Episcopal Divinity School, Philadelphia. [_Now ready._ + + Professor Gould's Commentaries on the Gospel of Mark (in the + _International Critical Commentary_) and the Epistles to the + Corinthians (in the _American Commentary_) are critical and + exegetical attempts to supply those elements which are lacking in + existing works of the same general aim and scope. + + +THE HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN LITERATURE UNTIL EUSEBIUS + + Prof. J. W. PLATNER, Professor of Early Church History, Harvard + University. + + Professor Platner's work will not only treat the writings of the + early Christian writers, but will also treat of the history of the + New Testament Canon. + + +OTHERS TO FOLLOW + + "An excellent series of scholarly, yet concise and inexpensive New + Testament handbooks."--_Christian Advocate_, New York. + + "These books are remarkably well suited in language, style, and + price, to all students of the New Testament."--_The + Congregationalist_, Boston. + + * * * * * + + THE MACMILLAN COMPANY + + 66 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK + + + + +Transcriber's Note (Significant Amendments): + + p. 28, 'Saltpetriere' amended to _Salpetriere_. + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Miracles and Supernatural Religion, by +James Morris Whiton + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MIRACLES AND SUPERNATURAL RELIGION *** + +***** This file should be named 26397.txt or 26397.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/2/6/3/9/26397/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Stephen Blundell and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
