summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/25585-tei
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '25585-tei')
-rw-r--r--25585-tei/25585-tei.tei14818
1 files changed, 14818 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/25585-tei/25585-tei.tei b/25585-tei/25585-tei.tei
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d2e386b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/25585-tei/25585-tei.tei
@@ -0,0 +1,14818 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
+
+<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://www.gutenberg.org/tei/marcello/0.4/dtd/pgtei.dtd" [
+
+<!ENTITY u5 "http://www.tei-c.org/Lite/">
+
+]>
+
+<TEI.2 lang="en">
+<teiHeader>
+ <fileDesc>
+ <titleStmt>
+ <title>Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher</title>
+ <author><name reg="Coleridge, S. T.">S. T. Coleridge</name></author>
+ </titleStmt>
+ <editionStmt>
+ <edition n="1">Edition 1</edition>
+ </editionStmt>
+ <publicationStmt>
+ <publisher>Project Gutenberg</publisher>
+ <date>May 24, 2008</date>
+ <idno type="etext-no">25585</idno>
+ <availability>
+ <p>This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and
+ with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
+ away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
+ License online at www.gutenberg.org/license</p>
+ </availability>
+ </publicationStmt>
+ <sourceDesc>
+ <bibl>
+ Created electronically.
+ </bibl>
+ </sourceDesc>
+ </fileDesc>
+ <encodingDesc>
+ </encodingDesc>
+ <profileDesc>
+ <langUsage>
+ <language id="en"></language>
+ <language id="it" />
+ <language id="fr" />
+ <language id="la" />
+ </langUsage>
+ </profileDesc>
+ <revisionDesc>
+ <change>
+ <date value="2008-05-24">May 24, 2008</date>
+ <respStmt>
+ <name>
+ Produced by Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, David King, and the Online
+ Distributed Proofreading Team at &lt;http://www.pgdp.net/&gt;.
+ (This file was made using scans of public domain works from the
+ University of Mochigan Digital Libraries.)
+ Page-images available at
+ &lt;http://www.pgdp.net/projects/projectID44006ca6acbb7/&gt;
+ </name>
+ </respStmt>
+ <item>Project Gutenberg TEI edition 1</item>
+ </change>
+ </revisionDesc>
+</teiHeader>
+
+<pgExtensions>
+ <pgStyleSheet>
+ .boxed { x-class: boxed }
+ .rules { x-class: rules; rules: all }
+ .indent { margin-left: 2 }
+ .bold { font-weight: bold }
+ .italic { font-style: italic }
+ .smallcaps { font-variant: small-caps }
+ </pgStyleSheet>
+
+ <pgCharMap formats="txt.iso-8859-1">
+ <char id="U0x2014">
+ <charName>mdash</charName>
+ <desc>EM DASH</desc>
+ <mapping>--</mapping>
+ </char>
+ <char id="U0x2003">
+ <charName>emsp</charName>
+ <desc>EM SPACE</desc>
+ <mapping> </mapping>
+ </char>
+ <char id="U0x2026">
+ <charName>hellip</charName>
+ <desc>HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS</desc>
+ <mapping>...</mapping>
+ </char>
+ </pgCharMap>
+</pgExtensions>
+
+<text lang="en">
+ <front>
+ <div>
+ <divGen type="pgheader" />
+ </div>
+ <div>
+ <divGen type="encodingDesc" />
+ </div>
+
+ <div rend="page-break-before: always">
+ <p rend="font-size: xx-large; text-align: center; bold">Shakespeare</p>
+ <p rend="font-size: xx-large; text-align: center">Ben Jonson</p>
+ <p rend="font-size: xx-large; text-align: center">Beaumont And Fletcher</p>
+ <p rend="font-size: large; text-align: center">Notes and Lectures</p>
+ <p rend="font-size: xx-large; text-align: center">by S. T. Coleridge</p>
+ <p rend="font-size: large; text-align: center">New Edition</p>
+ <p rend="text-align: center">Liverpool</p>
+ <p rend="text-align: center">Edward Howell</p>
+ <p rend="text-align: center">MDCCCLXXIV</p>
+ </div>
+ <div rend="page-break-before: always">
+ <head>Contents</head>
+ <divGen type="toc" />
+ </div>
+ </front>
+<body>
+
+<pb n='001'/><anchor id='Pg001'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc" level1="Shakespeare"/>
+<index index="pdf" level1="Shakespeare"/>
+<head>Shakespeare, With introductory matter on Poetry, the
+Drama, and the Stage.
+</head>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Definition Of Poetry.</head>
+
+<p>
+Poetry is not the proper antithesis to prose,
+but to science. Poetry is opposed to science,
+and prose to metre. The proper and immediate
+object of science is the acquirement, or communication,
+of truth; the proper and immediate object
+of poetry is the communication of immediate pleasure.
+This definition is useful; but as it would
+include novels and other works of fiction, which
+yet we do not call poems, there must be some
+additional character by which poetry is not only
+divided from opposites, but likewise distinguished
+from disparate, though similar, modes of composition.
+Now how is this to be effected? In animated
+prose, the beauties of nature, and the passions and
+accidents of human nature, are often expressed in
+that natural language which the contemplation of
+them would suggest to a pure and benevolent
+mind; yet still neither we nor the writers call such
+a work a poem, though no work could deserve that
+name which did not include all this, together with
+something else. What is this? It is that pleasurable
+emotion, that peculiar state and degree of
+excitement, which arises in the poet himself in the
+act of composition;&mdash;and in order to understand
+this, we must combine a more than ordinary sympathy
+<pb n='002'/><anchor id='Pg002'/>
+with the objects, emotions, or incidents contemplated
+by the poet, consequent on a more than
+common sensibility, with a more than ordinary
+activity of the mind in respect of the fancy and
+the imagination. Hence is produced a more vivid
+reflection of the truths of nature and of the human
+heart, united with a constant activity modifying
+and correcting these truths by that sort of pleasurable
+emotion, which the exertion of all our faculties
+gives in a certain degree; but which can only
+be felt in perfection under the full play of those
+powers of mind, which are spontaneous rather than
+voluntary, and in which the effort required bears
+no proportion to the activity enjoyed. This is the
+state which permits the production of a highly
+pleasurable whole, of which each part shall also
+communicate for itself a distinct and conscious
+pleasure; and hence arises the definition, which I
+trust is now intelligible, that poetry, or rather a
+poem, is a species of composition, opposed to
+science, as having intellectual pleasure for its
+object, and as attaining its end by the use of
+language natural to us in a state of excitement,&mdash;but
+distinguished from other species of composition,
+not excluded by the former criterion, by
+permitting a pleasure from the whole consistent
+with a consciousness of pleasure from the component
+parts;&mdash;and the perfection of which is, to
+communicate from each part the greatest immediate
+pleasure compatible with the largest sum
+of pleasure on the whole. This, of course, will
+vary with the different modes of poetry;&mdash;and
+that splendour of particular lines, which would
+be worthy of admiration in an impassioned elegy,
+or a short indignant satire, would be a blemish
+<pb n='003'/><anchor id='Pg003'/>
+and proof of vile taste in a tragedy or an epic
+poem.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is remarkable, by the way, that Milton in
+three incidental words has implied all which for
+the purposes of more distinct apprehension, which
+at first must be slow-paced in order to be distinct,
+I have endeavoured to develope in a precise and
+strictly adequate definition. Speaking of poetry,
+he says, as in a parenthesis, <q>which is simple,
+sensuous, passionate.</q> How awful is the power of
+words!&mdash;fearful often in their consequences when
+merely felt, not understood; but most awful when
+both felt and understood!&mdash;Had these three words
+only been properly understood by, and present in
+the minds of, general readers, not only almost
+a library of false poetry would have been either
+precluded or still-born, but, what is of more consequence,
+works truly excellent and capable of
+enlarging the understanding, warming and purifying
+the heart, and placing in the centre of the
+whole being the germs of noble and manlike
+actions, would have been the common diet of the
+intellect instead. For the first condition, simplicity,&mdash;while,
+on the one hand, it distinguishes
+poetry from the arduous processes of science,
+labouring towards an end not yet arrived at, and
+supposes a smooth and finished road, on which the
+reader is to walk onward easily, with streams murmuring
+by his side, and trees and flowers and
+human dwellings to make his journey as delightful
+as the object of it is desirable, instead of
+having to toil with the pioneers and painfully
+make the road on which others are to travel,&mdash;precludes,
+on the other hand, every affectation and
+morbid peculiarity;&mdash;the second condition, sensuousness,
+<pb n='004'/><anchor id='Pg004'/>
+insures that framework of objectivity,
+that definiteness and articulation of imagery, and
+that modification of the images themselves, without
+which poetry becomes flattened into mere
+didactics of practice, or evaporated into a hazy,
+unthoughtful, day-dreaming; and the third condition,
+passion, provides that neither thought nor
+imagery shall be simply objective, but that the
+<foreign lang="it" rend="font-style: italic">passio vera</foreign>
+of humanity shall warm and animate both.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To return, however, to the previous definition,
+this most general and distinctive character of a
+poem originates in the poetic genius itself; and
+though it comprises whatever can with any propriety
+be called a poem (unless that word be a
+mere lazy synonym for a composition in metre),
+it yet becomes a just, and not merely discriminative,
+but full and adequate, definition of poetry in
+its highest and most peculiar sense, only so far
+as the distinction still results from the poetic
+genius, which sustains and modifies the emotions,
+thoughts, and vivid representations of the poem
+by the energy without effort of the poet's own
+mind,&mdash;by the spontaneous activity of his imagination
+and fancy, and by whatever else with
+these reveals itself in the balancing and reconciling
+of opposite or discordant qualities, sameness
+with difference, a sense of novelty and freshness
+with old or customary objects, a more than usual
+state of emotion with more than usual order, self-possession
+and judgment with enthusiasm and
+vehement feeling,&mdash;and which, while it blends
+and harmonizes the natural and the artificial, still
+subordinates art to nature, the manner to the
+matter, and our admiration of the poet to our
+<pb n='005'/><anchor id='Pg005'/>
+sympathy with the images, passions, characters,
+and incidents of the poem:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Doubtless, this could not be, but that she turns</q></l>
+<l>Bodies to <emph>spirit</emph> by sublimation strange,</l>
+<l>As fire converts to fire the things it burns&mdash;</l>
+<l>As we our food into our nature change!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">From their gross matter she abstracts <emph>their</emph> forms,</q></l>
+<l>And draws a kind of quintessence from things,</l>
+<l>Which to her proper nature she transforms</l>
+<l>To bear them light on her celestial wings!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><emph>Thus</emph> doth she, when from <emph>individual states</emph></q></l>
+<l>She doth abstract the universal kinds,</l>
+<l><emph>Which then reclothed in divers names and fates</emph></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Steal access thro' our senses to our minds</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='007'/><anchor id='Pg007'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Greek Drama.</head>
+
+<p>
+It is truly singular that Plato,&mdash;whose philosophy
+and religion were but exotic at home,
+and a mere opposition to the finite in all things,
+genuine prophet and anticipator as he was of the
+Protestant Christian æra,&mdash;should have given in
+his Dialogue of the Banquet, a justification of
+our Shakespeare. For he relates that, when all
+the other guests had either dispersed or fallen
+asleep, Socrates only, together with Aristophanes
+and Agathon, remained awake, and that, while he
+continued to drink with them out of a large goblet,
+he compelled them, though most reluctantly, to
+admit that it was the business of one and the same
+genius to excel in tragic and comic poetry, or that
+the tragic poet ought, at the same time, to contain
+within himself the powers of comedy. Now, as
+this was directly repugnant to the entire theory of
+the ancient critics, and contrary to all their experience,
+it is evident that Plato must have fixed the
+eye of his contemplation on the innermost essentials
+of the drama, abstracted from the forms of
+age or country. In another passage he even adds
+the reason, namely, that opposites illustrate each
+other's nature, and in their struggle draw forth
+the strength of the combatants, and display the
+conqueror as sovereign even on the territories of
+the rival power.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Nothing can more forcibly exemplify the separative
+spirit of the Greek arts than their comedy as
+opposed to their tragedy. But as the immediate
+<pb n='008'/><anchor id='Pg008'/>
+struggle of contraries supposes an arena common
+to both, so both were alike ideal; that is, the
+comedy of Aristophanes rose to as great a distance
+above the ludicrous of real life, as the tragedy of
+Sophocles above its tragic events and passions,&mdash;and
+it is in this one point, of absolute ideality,
+that the comedy of Shakespeare and the old comedy
+of Athens coincide. In this also alone did the
+Greek tragedy and comedy unite; in every thing
+else they were exactly opposed to each other.
+Tragedy is poetry in its deepest earnest; comedy
+is poetry in unlimited jest. Earnestness consists
+in the direction and convergence of all the powers
+of the soul to one aim, and in the voluntary restraint
+of its activity in consequence; the opposite,
+therefore, lies in the apparent abandonment of all
+definite aim or end, and in the removal of all
+bounds in the exercise of the mind,&mdash;attaining its
+real end, as an entire contrast, most perfectly, the
+greater the display is of intellectual wealth squandered
+in the wantonness of sport without an object,
+and the more abundant the life and vivacity in the
+creations of the arbitrary will.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The later comedy, even where it was really
+comic, was doubtless likewise more comic, the more
+free it appeared from any fixed aim. Misunderstandings
+of intention, fruitless struggles of absurd
+passion, contradictions of temper, and laughable
+situations there were; but still the form of the representation
+itself was serious; it proceeded as
+much according to settled laws, and used as much
+the same means of art, though to a different purpose,
+as the regular tragedy itself. But in the old
+comedy the very form itself is whimsical; the
+whole work is one great jest, comprehending a
+<pb n='009'/><anchor id='Pg009'/>
+world of jests within it, among which each maintains
+its own place without seeming to concern
+itself as to the relation in which it may stand to its
+fellows. In short, in Sophocles, the constitution of
+tragedy is monarchical, but such as it existed in
+elder Greece, limited by laws, and therefore the
+more venerable,&mdash;all the parts adapting and submitting
+themselves to the majesty of the heroic
+sceptre:&mdash;in Aristophanes, comedy, on the contrary,
+is poetry in its most democratic form, and it
+is a fundamental principle with it, rather to risk all
+the confusion of anarchy, than to destroy the
+independence and privileges of its individual constituents,&mdash;place,
+verse, characters, even single
+thoughts, conceits, and allusions, each turning on
+the pivot of its own free will.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The tragic poet idealizes his characters by giving
+to the spiritual part of our nature a more decided
+preponderance over the animal cravings and impulses,
+than is met with in real life: the comic
+poet idealizes his characters by making the animal
+the governing power, and the intellectual the mere
+instrument. But as tragedy is not a collection of
+virtues and perfections, but takes care only that
+the vices and imperfections shall spring from the
+passions, errors, and prejudices which arise out of
+the soul;&mdash;so neither is comedy a mere crowd of
+vices and follies, but whatever qualities it represents,
+even though they are in a certain sense
+amiable, it still displays them as having their origin
+in some dependence on our lower nature, accompanied
+with a defect in true freedom of spirit and
+self-subsistence, and subject to that unconnection
+by contradictions of the inward being, to which
+all folly is owing.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='010'/><anchor id='Pg010'/>
+
+<p>
+The ideal of earnest poetry consists in the union
+and harmonious melting down, and fusion of the
+sensual into the spiritual,&mdash;of man as an animal
+into man as a power of reason and self-government.
+And this we have represented to us most
+clearly in the plastic art, or statuary; where the
+perfection of outward form is a symbol of the perfection
+of an inward idea; where the body is
+wholly penetrated by the soul, and spiritualized
+even to a state of glory, and like a transparent
+substance, the matter, in its own nature darkness,
+becomes altogether a vehicle and fixture of light, a
+means of developing its beauties, and unfolding its
+wealth of various colours without disturbing its
+unity, or causing a division of the parts. The
+sportive ideal, on the contrary, consists in the perfect
+harmony and concord of the higher nature
+with the animal, as with its ruling principle and its
+acknowledged regent. The understanding and
+practical reason are represented as the willing
+slaves of the senses and appetites, and of the passions
+arising out of them. Hence we may admit
+the appropriateness to the old comedy, as a work
+of defined art, of allusions and descriptions, which
+morality can never justify, and, only with reference
+to the author himself, and only as being the effect
+or rather the cause of the circumstances in which
+he wrote, can consent even to palliate.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The old comedy rose to its perfection in Aristophanes,
+and in him also it died with the freedom of
+Greece. Then arose a species of drama, more fitly
+called dramatic entertainment than comedy, but of
+which, nevertheless, our modern comedy (Shakespeare's
+altogether excepted) is the genuine descendant.
+Euripides had already brought tragedy lower
+<pb n='011'/><anchor id='Pg011'/>
+down and by many steps nearer to the real world
+than his predecessors had ever done, and the passionate
+admiration which Menander and Philemon
+expressed for him, and their open avowals that he
+was their great master, entitle us to consider their
+dramas as of a middle species, between tragedy and
+comedy,&mdash;not the tragi-comedy, or thing of heterogeneous
+parts, but a complete whole, founded on
+principles of its own. Throughout we find the
+drama of Menander distinguishing itself from tragedy,
+but not as the genuine old comedy, contrasting
+with, and opposing it. Tragedy, indeed, carried
+the thoughts into the mythologic world, in order
+to raise the emotions, the fears, and the hopes,
+which convince the inmost heart that their final
+cause is not to be discovered in the limits of mere
+mortal life, and force us into a presentiment, however
+dim, of a state in which those struggles of inward
+free will with outward necessity, which form
+the true subject of the tragedian, shall be reconciled
+and solved;&mdash;the entertainment or new comedy,
+on the other hand, remained within the circle of
+experience. Instead of the tragic destiny, it introduced
+the power of chance; even in the few fragments
+of Menander and Philemon now remaining
+to us, we find many exclamations and reflections
+concerning chance and fortune, as in the tragic
+poets concerning destiny. In tragedy, the moral
+law, either as obeyed or violated, above all consequences&mdash;its
+own maintenance or violation
+constituting the most important of all consequences&mdash;forms
+the ground; the new comedy,
+and our modern comedy in general (Shakespeare
+excepted as before) lies in prudence or imprudence,
+enlightened or misled self-love. The whole moral
+<pb n='012'/><anchor id='Pg012'/>
+system of the entertainment exactly like that of
+fable, consists in rules of prudence, with an exquisite
+conciseness, and at the same time an
+exhaustive fulness of sense. An old critic said
+that tragedy was the flight or elevation of life,
+comedy (that of Menander) its arrangement or
+ordonnance.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Add to these features a portrait-like truth of
+character,&mdash;not so far indeed as that a <hi rend='italic'>bona fide</hi>
+individual should be described or imagined, but yet
+so that the features which give interest and permanence
+to the class should be individualized. The old
+tragedy moved in an ideal world,&mdash;the old comedy
+in a fantastic world. As the entertainment, or new
+comedy, restrained the creative activity both of
+the fancy and the imagination, it indemnified the
+understanding in appealing to the judgment for the
+probability of the scenes represented. The ancients
+themselves acknowledged the new comedy as an
+exact copy of real life. The grammarian, Aristophanes,
+somewhat affectedly exclaimed:&mdash;<q>O Life
+and Menander! which of you two imitated the
+other?</q> In short the form of this species of drama
+was poetry, the stuff or matter was prose. It was
+prose rendered delightful by the blandishments
+and measured motions of the muse. Yet even this
+was not universal. The mimes of Sophron, so
+passionately admired by Plato, were written in
+prose, and were scenes out of real life conducted
+in dialogue. The exquisite feast of Adonis
+(Συρακούσιαι ῆ Ἀδωνιάζουσαι) in Theocritus, we are
+told, with some others of his eclogues, were close
+imitations of certain mimes of Sophron&mdash;free translations
+of the prose into hexameters.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It will not be improper, in this place, to make a
+<pb n='013'/><anchor id='Pg013'/>
+few remarks on the remarkable character and functions
+of the chorus in the Greek tragic drama.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The chorus entered from below, close by the
+orchestra, and there, pacing to and fro during the
+choral odes, performed their solemn measured
+dance. In the centre of the <hi rend='italic'>orchestra</hi>, directly
+over against the middle of the <hi rend='italic'>scene</hi>, there stood an
+elevation with steps in the shape of a large altar,
+as high as the boards of the <hi rend='italic'>logeion</hi> or moveable
+stage. This elevation was named the <hi rend='italic'>thymele</hi>
+(θυμέλη), and served to recall the origin and original
+purpose of the chorus, as an altar-song in honour
+of the presiding deity. Here, and on these steps
+the persons of the chorus sate collectively, when
+they were not singing; attending to the dialogue
+as spectators, and acting as (what in truth they
+were) the ideal representatives of the real audience,
+and of the poet himself in his own character,
+assuming the supposed impressions made by the
+drama, in order to direct and rule them. But when
+the chorus itself formed part of the dialogue, then
+the leader of the band, the foreman, or <hi rend='italic'>coryphæus</hi>,
+ascended, as some think, the level summit of the
+<hi rend='italic'>thymele</hi> in order to command the stage, or, perhaps,
+the whole chorus advanced to the front of the orchestra,
+and thus put themselves in ideal connection,
+as it were, with the <hi rend='italic'>dramatis personæ</hi> there acting.
+This <hi rend='italic'>thymele</hi> was in the centre of the whole edifice,
+all the measurements were calculated, and the semi-circle
+of the amphitheatre was drawn from this
+point. It had a double use, a twofold purpose; it
+constantly reminded the spectators of the origin of
+tragedy as a religious service, and declared itself
+as the ideal representative of the audience by
+having its place exactly in the point, to which all
+<pb n='014'/><anchor id='Pg014'/>
+the radii from the different seats or benches converged.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this double character, as constituent parts,
+and yet at the same time as spectators, of the drama,
+the chorus could not but tend to enforce the unity
+of place;&mdash;not on the score of any supposed improbability,
+which the understanding or common sense
+might detect in a change of place;&mdash;but because the
+senses themselves put it out of the power of any
+imagination to conceive a place coming to, and
+going away from the persons, instead of the persons
+changing their place. Yet there are instances,
+in which, during the silence of the chorus, the poets
+have hazarded this by a change in that part of the
+scenery which represented the more distant objects
+to the eye of the spectator&mdash;a demonstrative proof,
+that this alternately extolled and ridiculed unity
+(as ignorantly ridiculed as extolled) was grounded
+on no essential principle of reason, but arose out of
+circumstances which the poet could not remove,
+and therefore took up into the form of the drama,
+and co-organised it with all the other parts into a
+living whole.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The Greek tragedy may rather be compared to
+our serious opera than to the tragedies of Shakespeare;
+nevertheless, the difference is far greater
+than the likeness. In the opera all is subordinated
+to the music, the dresses, and the scenery;&mdash;the
+poetry is a mere vehicle for articulation, and as
+little pleasure is lost by ignorance of the Italian
+language, so is little gained by the knowledge of it.
+But in the Greek drama all was but as instruments
+and accessaries to the poetry; and hence we should
+form a better notion of the choral music from the
+solemn hymns and psalms of austere church music
+<pb n='015'/><anchor id='Pg015'/>
+than from any species of theatrical singing. A
+single flute or pipe was the ordinary accompaniment;
+and it is not to be supposed, that any display
+of musical power was allowed to obscure the distinct
+hearing of the words. On the contrary, the
+evident purpose was to render the words more
+audible, and to secure by the elevations and pauses
+greater facility of understanding the poetry. For
+the choral songs are, and ever must have been, the
+most difficult part of the tragedy; there occur in
+them the most involved verbal compounds, the
+newest expressions, the boldest images, the most
+recondite allusions. Is it credible that the poets
+would, one and all, have been thus prodigal of the
+stores of art and genius, if they had known that in
+the representation the whole must have been lost
+to the audience,&mdash;at a time too, when the means of
+after publication were so difficult and expensive,
+and the copies of their works so slowly and narrowly
+circulated?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The masks also must be considered&mdash;their vast
+variety and admirable workmanship. Of this we
+retain proof by the marble masks which represented
+them; but to this in the real mask we must add the
+thinness of the substance and the exquisite fitting
+on to the head of the actor; so that not only were
+the very eyes painted with a single opening left for
+the pupil of the actor's eye, but in some instances,
+even the iris itself was painted, when the colour
+was a known characteristic of the divine or heroic
+personage represented.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Finally, I will note down those fundamental
+characteristics which contradistinguish the ancient
+literature from the modern generally, but which
+more especially appear in prominence in the tragic
+<pb n='016'/><anchor id='Pg016'/>
+drama. The ancient was allied to statuary, the
+modern refers to painting. In the first there is a
+predominance of rhythm and melody, in the second
+of harmony and counterpoint. The Greeks idolized
+the finite, and therefore were the masters of all grace,
+elegance, proportion, fancy, dignity, majesty&mdash;of
+whatever, in short, is capable of being definitely
+conveyed by defined forms or thoughts: the moderns
+revere the infinite, and affect the indefinite as a
+vehicle of the infinite;&mdash;hence their passions, their
+obscure hopes and fears, their wandering through
+the unknown, their grander moral feelings, their
+more august conception of man as man, their
+future rather than their past&mdash;in a word, their
+sublimity.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='017'/><anchor id='Pg017'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Progress Of The Drama.</head>
+
+<p>
+Let two persons join in the same scheme to
+ridicule a third, and either take advantage of,
+or invent, some story for that purpose, and mimicry
+will have already produced a sort of rude comedy.
+It becomes an inviting treat to the populace, and
+gains an additional zest and burlesque by following
+the already established plan of tragedy; and the
+first man of genius who seizes the idea, and reduces
+it into form,&mdash;into a work of art,&mdash;by metre and
+music, is the Aristophanes of the country.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+How just this account is will appear from the
+fact that in the first or old comedy of the Athenians,
+most of the <hi rend='italic'>dramatis personæ</hi> were living characters
+introduced under their own names; and no doubt,
+their ordinary dress, manner, person and voice
+were closely mimicked. In less favourable states
+of society, as that of England in the middle ages,
+the beginnings of comedy would be constantly
+taking place from the mimics and satirical minstrels;
+but from want of fixed abode, popular government,
+and the successive attendance of the same auditors,
+it would still remain in embryo. I shall, perhaps,
+have occasion to observe that this remark is not
+without importance in explaining the essential
+differences of the modern and ancient theatres.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Phenomena, similar to those which accompanied
+the origin of tragedy and comedy among the
+Greeks, would take place among the Romans much
+more slowly, and the drama would, in any case,
+<pb n='018'/><anchor id='Pg018'/>
+have much longer remained in its first irregular
+form from the character of the people, their continual
+engagements in wars of conquest, the nature
+of their government, and their rapidly increasing
+empire. But, however this might have been, the
+conquest of Greece precluded both the process and
+the necessity of it; and the Roman stage at once
+presented imitations or translations of the Greek
+drama. This continued till the perfect establishment
+of Christianity. Some attempts, indeed, were
+made to adapt the persons of Scriptural or ecclesiastical
+history to the drama; and sacred plays, it
+is probable, were not unknown in Constantinople
+under the emperors of the East. The first of the
+kind is, I believe, the only one preserved,&mdash;namely,
+the Χριστὸς Πάσχων, or, <q>Christ in his sufferings,</q>
+by Gregory Nazianzen,&mdash;possibly written in
+consequence of the prohibition of profane literature
+to the Christians by the apostate Julian. In the
+West, however, the enslaved and debauched Roman
+world became too barbarous for any theatrical
+exhibitions more refined than those of pageants
+and chariot-races; while the spirit of Christianity,
+which in its most corrupt form still breathed general
+humanity, whenever controversies of faith were
+not concerned, had done away the cruel combats
+of the gladiators, and the loss of the distant provinces
+prevented the possibility of exhibiting the
+engagements of wild beasts.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I pass, therefore, at once to the feudal ages
+which soon succeeded, confining my observation to
+this country; though, indeed, the same remark
+with very few alterations will apply to all the
+other states, into which the great empire was
+broken. Ages of darkness succeeded;&mdash;not, indeed,
+<pb n='019'/><anchor id='Pg019'/>
+the darkness of Russia or of the barbarous
+lands unconquered by Rome; for from the time
+of Honorius to the destruction of Constantinople
+and the consequent introduction of ancient literature
+into Europe, there was a continued succession
+of individual intellects;&mdash;the golden chain was
+never wholly broken, though the connecting links
+were often of baser metal. A dark cloud, like
+another sky, covered the entire cope of heaven,&mdash;but
+in this place it thinned away, and white stains
+of light showed a half eclipsed star behind it,&mdash;in
+that place it was rent asunder, and a star
+passed across the opening in all its brightness,
+and then vanished. Such stars exhibited themselves
+only; surrounding objects did not partake
+of their light. There were deep wells of knowledge,
+but no fertilizing rills and rivulets. For
+the drama, society was altogether a state of chaos,
+out of which it was, for a while at least, to proceed
+anew, as if there had been none before it. And
+yet it is not undelightful to contemplate the
+education of good from evil. The ignorance of
+the great mass of our countrymen was the efficient
+cause of the reproduction of the drama;
+and the preceding darkness and the returning
+light were alike necessary in order to the creation
+of a Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The drama re-commenced in England, as it first
+began in Greece, in religion. The people were not
+able to read,&mdash;the priesthood were unwilling that
+they should read; and yet their own interest
+compelled them not to leave the people wholly
+ignorant of the great events of sacred history.
+They did that, therefore, by scenic representations,
+which in after ages it has been attempted to do in
+<pb n='020'/><anchor id='Pg020'/>
+Roman Catholic countries by pictures. They presented
+Mysteries, and often at great expense; and
+reliques of this system still remain in the south of
+Europe, and indeed throughout Italy, where at
+Christmas the convents and the great nobles rival
+each other in the scenic representation of the
+birth of Christ and its circumstances. I heard
+two instances mentioned to me at different times,
+one in Sicily and the other in Rome, of noble
+devotees, the ruin of whose fortunes was said to
+have commenced in the extravagant expense
+which had been incurred in presenting the
+<hi rend='italic'>præsepe</hi> or manger. But these Mysteries, in
+order to answer their design, must not only be
+instructive, but entertaining; and as, when they
+became so, the people began to take pleasure in
+acting them themselves&mdash;in interloping&mdash;(against
+which the priests seem to have fought hard and
+yet in vain) the most ludicrous images were
+mixed with the most awful personations; and
+whatever the subject might be, however sublime,
+however pathetic, yet the Vice and the Devil,
+who are the genuine antecessors of Harlequin
+and the Clown, were necessary component parts.
+I have myself a piece of this kind, which I transcribed
+a few years ago at Helmstadt, in Germany,
+on the education of Eve's children, in
+which after the fall and repentance of Adam, the
+offended Maker, as in proof of his reconciliation,
+condescends to visit them, and to catechise the
+children,&mdash;who with a noble contempt of chronology
+are all brought together from Abel to Noah.
+The good children say the ten Commandments,
+the Belief, and the Lord's Prayer; but Cain and
+his rout, after he had received a box on the ear
+<pb n='021'/><anchor id='Pg021'/>
+for not taking off his hat, and afterwards offering
+his left hand, is prompted by the devil so to
+blunder in the Lord's Prayer as to reverse the
+petitions and say it backward!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Unaffectedly I declare I feel pain at repetitions
+like these, however innocent. As historical documents
+they are valuable; but I am sensible that
+what I can read with my eye with perfect innocence,
+I cannot without inward fear and
+misgivings pronounce with my tongue.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Let me, however, be acquitted of presumption
+if I say that I cannot agree with Mr. Malone,
+that our ancestors did not perceive the ludicrous
+in these things, or that they paid no separate
+attention to the serious and comic parts. Indeed
+his own statement contradicts it. For what purpose
+should the Vice leap upon the Devil's back
+and belabour him, but to produce this separate
+attention? The people laughed heartily, no
+doubt. Nor can I conceive any meaning attached
+to the words <q>separate attention,</q> that
+is not fully answered by one part of an exhibition
+exciting seriousness or pity, and the other
+raising mirth and loud laughter. That they felt
+no impiety in the affair is most true. For it is
+the very essence of that system of Christian polytheism,
+which in all its essentials is now fully as
+gross in Spain, in Sicily, and the South of Italy, as
+it ever was in England in the days of Henry VI.
+(nay, more so, for a Wicliffe had not then appeared
+only, but scattered the good seed widely),&mdash;it
+is an essential part, I say, of that system to draw
+the mind wholly from its own inward whispers and
+quiet discriminations, and to habituate the conscience
+to pronounce sentence in every case according
+<pb n='022'/><anchor id='Pg022'/>
+to the established verdicts of the church and
+the casuists. I have looked through volume after
+volume of the most approved casuists,&mdash;and still I
+find disquisitions whether this or that act is right,
+and under what circumstances, to a minuteness
+that makes reasoning ridiculous, and of a callous
+and unnatural immodesty, to which none but a
+monk could harden himself, who has been stripped
+of all the tender charities of life, yet is goaded on
+to make war against them by the unsubdued
+hauntings of our meaner nature, even as dogs are
+said to get the <hi rend='italic'>hydrophobia</hi> from excessive thirst.
+I fully believe that our ancestors laughed as
+heartily, as their posterity do at Grimaldi;&mdash;and
+not having been told that they would be punished
+for laughing, they thought it very innocent;&mdash;and
+if their priests had left out murder in the catalogue
+of their prohibitions (as indeed they did under
+certain circumstances of heresy), the greater part
+of them,&mdash;the moral instincts common to all men
+having been smothered and kept from development,&mdash;would
+have thought as little of murder.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+However this may be, the necessity of at once
+instructing and gratifying the people produced the
+great distinction between the Greek and the English
+theatres;&mdash;for to this we must attribute the
+origin of tragi-comedy, or a representation of
+human events more lively, nearer the truth, and
+permitting a larger field of moral instruction, a
+more ample exhibition of the recesses of the human
+heart, under all the trials and circumstances that
+most concern us, than was known or guessed at by
+Æschylus, Sophocles, or Euripides;&mdash;and at the
+same time we learn to account for, and&mdash;relatively
+to the author&mdash;perceive the necessity of, the Fool
+<pb n='023'/><anchor id='Pg023'/>
+or Clown or both, as the substitutes of the Vice
+and the Devil, which our ancestors had been so
+accustomed to see in every exhibition of the stage,
+that they could not feel any performance perfect
+without them. Even to this day in Italy, every
+opera&mdash;(even Metastasio obeyed the claim throughout)&mdash;must
+have six characters, generally two pairs
+of cross lovers, a tyrant and a confidant, or a
+father and two confidants, themselves lovers;&mdash;and
+when a new opera appears, it is the universal
+fashion to ask&mdash;which is the tyrant, which the
+lover? &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is the especial honour of Christianity, that in
+its worst and most corrupted form it cannot wholly
+separate itself from morality;&mdash;whereas the other
+religions in their best form (I do not include
+Mohammedanism, which is only an anomalous corruption
+of Christianity, like Swedenborgianism)
+have no connection with it. The very impersonation
+of moral evil under the name of Vice,
+facilitated all other impersonations; and hence we
+see that the Mysteries were succeeded by Moralities,
+or dialogues and plots of allegorical personages.
+Again, some character in real history had become
+so famous, so proverbial, as Nero for instance, that
+they were introduced instead of the moral quality,
+for which they were so noted;&mdash;and in this manner
+the stage was moving on to the absolute production
+of heroic and comic real characters, when the restoration
+of literature, followed by the ever-blessed
+Reformation, let in upon the kingdom not only new
+knowledge, but new motive. A useful rivalry commenced
+between the metropolis on the one hand,&mdash;the
+residence, independently of the court and
+nobles, of the most active and stirring spirits who
+<pb n='024'/><anchor id='Pg024'/>
+had not been regularly educated, or who, from mischance
+or otherwise, had forsaken the beaten track
+of preferment,&mdash;and the universities on the other.
+The latter prided themselves on their closer approximation
+to the ancient rules and ancient regularity&mdash;taking
+the theatre of Greece, or rather its
+dim reflection, the rhetorical tragedies of the poet
+Seneca, as a perfect ideal, without any critical
+collation of the times, origin, or circumstances;&mdash;whilst,
+in the mean time, the popular writers, who
+could not and would not abandon what they had
+found to delight their countrymen sincerely, and
+not merely from inquiries first put to the recollection
+of rules, and answered in the affirmative, as if
+it had been an arithmetical sum, did yet borrow
+from the scholars whatever they advantageously
+could, consistently with their own peculiar means
+of pleasing.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+And here let me pause for a moment's contemplation
+of this interesting subject.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+We call, for we see and feel, the swan and the
+dove both transcendantly beautiful. As absurd as
+it would be to institute a comparison between their
+separate claims to beauty from any abstract rule
+common to both, without reference to the life and
+being of the animals themselves,&mdash;or as if, having
+first seen the dove, we abstracted its outlines, gave
+them a false generalization, called them the principles
+or ideal of bird-beauty, and then proceeded
+to criticise the swan or the eagle;&mdash;not less absurd
+is it to pass judgment on the works of a poet on
+the mere ground that they have been called by the
+same class-name with the works of other poets in
+other times and circumstances, or on any ground,
+indeed, save that of their inappropriateness to their
+<pb n='025'/><anchor id='Pg025'/>
+own end and being, their want of significance, as
+symbols or physiognomy.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+O! few have there been among critics, who have
+followed with the eye of the imagination the imperishable
+yet ever wandering spirit of poetry
+through its various metempsychoses, and consequent
+metamorphoses;&mdash;or who have rejoiced in
+the light of clear perception at beholding with
+each new birth, with each rare <hi rend='italic'>avatar</hi>, the human
+race frame to itself a new body, by assimilating
+materials of nourishment out of its new circumstances,
+and work for itself new organs of power
+appropriate to the new sphere of its motion and
+activity!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I have before spoken of the Romance, or the
+language formed out of the decayed Roman and
+the Northern tongues; and comparing it with the
+Latin, we find it less perfect in simplicity and relation&mdash;the
+privileges of a language formed by the
+mere attraction of homogeneous parts;&mdash;but yet
+more rich, more expressive and various, as one
+formed by more obscure affinities out of a chaos of
+apparently heterogeneous atoms. As more than a
+metaphor,&mdash;as an analogy of this, I have named
+the true genuine modern poetry the romantic; and
+the works of Shakespeare are romantic poetry, revealing
+itself in the drama. If the tragedies of
+Sophocles are in the strict sense of the word
+tragedies, and the comedies of Aristophanes comedies,
+we must emancipate ourselves from a false
+association arising from misapplied names, and find
+a new word for the plays of Shakespeare. For they
+are, in the ancient sense, neither tragedies nor
+comedies, nor both in one,&mdash;but a different <hi rend='italic'>genus</hi>,
+diverse in kind, and not merely different in degree.
+<pb n='026'/><anchor id='Pg026'/>
+They may be called romantic dramas, or dramatic
+romances.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+A deviation from the simple forms and unities
+of the ancient stage is an essential principle, and,
+of course, an appropriate excellence, of the romantic
+drama. For these unities were to a great
+extent the natural form of that which in its
+elements was homogeneous, and the representation
+of which was addressed pre-eminently to the
+outward senses;&mdash;and though the fable, the
+language, and the characters appealed to the
+reason rather than to the mere understanding,
+inasmuch as they supposed an ideal state rather
+than referred to an existing reality,&mdash;yet it was a
+reason which was obliged to accommodate itself
+to the senses, and so far became a sort of more
+elevated understanding. On the other hand, the
+romantic poetry&mdash;the Shakespearian drama&mdash;appealed
+to the imagination rather than to the
+senses, and to the reason as contemplating our
+inward nature, and the workings of the passions
+in their most retired recesses. But the reason,
+as reason, is independent of time and space; it
+has nothing to do with them: and hence the
+certainties of reason have been called eternal
+truths. As for example&mdash;the endless properties
+of the circle:&mdash;what connection have they with
+this or that age, with this or that country?&mdash;The
+reason is aloof from time and space; the imagination
+is an arbitrary controller over both;&mdash;and
+if only the poet have such power of exciting our
+internal emotions as to make us present to the
+scene in imagination chiefly, he acquires the right
+and privilege of using time and space as they
+exist in imagination, and obedient only to the
+<pb n='027'/><anchor id='Pg027'/>
+laws by which the imagination itself acts. These
+laws it will be my object and aim to point out as
+the examples occur, which illustrate them. But
+here let me remark what can never be too often
+reflected on by all who would intelligently study
+the works either of the Athenian dramatists, or of
+Shakespeare, that the very essence of the former
+consists in the sternest separation of the diverse in
+kind and the disparate in the degree, whilst the
+latter delights in interlacing, by a rainbow-like
+transfusion of hues, the one with the other.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+And here it will be necessary to say a few words
+on the stage and on stage-illusion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+A theatre, in the widest sense of the word, is
+the general term for all places of amusement
+through the ear or eye, in which men assemble in
+order to be amused by some entertainment presented
+to all at the same time and in common.
+Thus an old Puritan divine says:&mdash;<q>Those who
+attend public worship and sermons only to amuse
+themselves, make a theatre of the church, and turn
+God's house into the devil's.
+<foreign lang="la" rend="font-style: italic">Theatra ædes diabololatricæ.</foreign></q>
+The most important and dignified
+species of this <hi rend='italic'>genus</hi> is, doubtless, the stage
+(<foreign lang="la" rend="font-style: italic">res
+theatralis histrionica</foreign>), which, in addition to the generic
+definition above given, may be characterized in
+its idea, or according to what it does, or ought to,
+aim at, as a combination of several or of all the
+fine arts in an harmonious whole, having a distinct
+end of its own, to which the peculiar end of each
+of the component arts, taken separately, is made
+subordinate and subservient,&mdash;that, namely, of
+imitating reality&mdash;whether external things, actions,
+or passions&mdash;-under a semblance of reality.
+Thus, Claude imitates a landscape at sunset, but
+<pb n='028'/><anchor id='Pg028'/>
+only as a picture; while a forest-scene is not presented
+to the spectators as a picture, but as a
+forest; and though, in the full sense of the word,
+we are no more deceived by the one than by the
+other, yet are our feelings very differently affected;
+and the pleasure derived from the one is not composed
+of the same elements as that afforded by the
+other, even on the supposition that the <hi rend='italic'>quantum</hi> of
+both were equal. In the former, a picture, it is a
+condition of all genuine delight that we should
+not be deceived; in the latter, stage-scenery (inasmuch
+as its principle end is not in or for itself, as
+is the case in a picture, but to be an assistance and
+means to an end out of itself), its very purpose is
+to produce as much illusion as its nature permits.
+These, and all other stage presentations, are to
+produce a sort of temporary half-faith, which the
+spectator encourages in himself and supports by a
+voluntary contribution on his own part, because
+he knows that it is at all times in his power to see
+the thing as it really is. I have often observed
+that little children are actually deceived by stage-scenery,
+never by pictures; though even these
+produce an effect on their impressible minds,
+which they do not on the minds of adults. The
+child, if strongly impressed, does not indeed positively
+think the picture to be the reality; but yet
+he does not think the contrary. As Sir George
+Beaumont was shewing me a very fine engraving
+from Rubens, representing a storm at sea without
+any vessel or boat introduced, my little boy, then
+about five years old, came dancing and singing
+into the room, and all at once (if I may so say)
+<emph>tumbled in</emph> upon the print. He instantly started,
+stood silent and motionless, with the strongest expression,
+<pb n='029'/><anchor id='Pg029'/>
+first of wonder and then of grief in his
+eyes and countenance, and at length said <q>And
+where is the ship? But that is sunk, and the men
+are all drowned!</q> still keeping his eyes fixed on
+the print. Now what pictures are to little children,
+stage illusion is to men, provided they retain
+any part of the child's sensibility; except, that in
+the latter instance, the suspension of the act of
+comparison, which permits this sort of negative
+belief, is somewhat more assisted by the will, than
+in that of a child respecting a picture.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The true stage-illusion in this and in all other
+things consists&mdash;not in the mind's judging it to be
+a forest, but, in its remission of the judgment that
+it is not a forest. And this subject of stage-illusion
+is so important, and so many practical errors and
+false criticisms may arise, and indeed have arisen,
+either from reasoning on it as actual delusion (the
+strange notion, on which the French critics built
+up their theory, and on which the French poets
+justify the construction of their tragedies), or
+from denying it altogether (which seems the end
+of Dr. Johnson's reasoning, and which, as extremes
+meet, would lead to the very same consequences,
+by excluding whatever would not be judged probable
+by us in our coolest state of feeling, with all
+our faculties in even balance), that these few remarks
+will, I hope, be pardoned, if they should
+serve either to explain or to illustrate the point.
+For not only are we never absolutely deluded&mdash;or
+any thing like it, but the attempt to cause the
+highest delusion possible to beings in their senses
+sitting in a theatre, is a gross fault, incident only
+to low minds, which, feeling that they cannot
+affect the heart or head permanently, endeavour to
+<pb n='030'/><anchor id='Pg030'/>
+call forth the momentary affections. There ought
+never to be more pain than is compatible with coexisting
+pleasure, and to be amply repaid by
+thought.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare found the infant stage demanding
+an intermixture of ludicrous character as imperiously
+as that of Greece did the chorus, and high
+language accordant. And there are many advantages
+in this;&mdash;a greater assimilation to nature, a
+greater scope of power, more truths, and more
+feelings;&mdash;the effects of contrast, as in Lear and
+the Fool; and especially this, that the true
+language of passion becomes sufficiently elevated
+by your having previously heard, in the same
+piece, the lighter conversation of men under no
+strong emotion. The very nakedness of the stage,
+too, was advantageous,&mdash;for the drama thence
+became something between recitation and a representation;
+and the absence or paucity of scenes
+allowed a freedom from the laws of unity of place
+and unity of time, the observance of which must
+either confine the drama to as few subjects as may
+be counted on the fingers, or involve gross improbabilities,
+far more striking than the violation
+would have caused. Thence, also, was precluded
+the danger of a false ideal,&mdash;of aiming at more
+than what is possible on the whole. What play
+of the ancients, with reference to their ideal, does
+not hold out more glaring absurdities than any in
+Shakespeare? On the Greek plan a man could
+more easily be a poet than a dramatist; upon our
+plan more easily a dramatist than a poet.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='031'/><anchor id='Pg031'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>The Drama Generally, And Public Taste.</head>
+
+<p>
+Unaccustomed to address such an audience,
+and having lost by a long interval of confinement
+the advantages of my former short schooling,
+I had miscalculated in my last Lecture the proportion
+of my matter to my time, and by bad
+economy and unskilful management, the several
+heads of my discourse failed in making the entire
+performance correspond with the promise publicly
+circulated in the weekly annunciation of the subjects
+to be treated. It would indeed have been
+wiser in me, and perhaps better on the whole, if I
+had caused my Lectures to be announced only as
+continuations of the main subject. But if I be,
+as perforce I must be, gratified by the recollection
+of whatever has appeared to give you pleasure, I
+am conscious of something better, though less
+flattering, a sense of unfeigned gratitude for your
+forbearance with my defects. Like affectionate
+guardians, you see without disgust the awkwardness,
+and witness with sympathy the growing
+pains, of a youthful endeavour, and look forward
+with a hope, which is its own reward, to the
+contingent results of practice&mdash;to its intellectual
+maturity.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In my last address I defined poetry to be the
+art, or whatever better term our language may
+afford, of representing external nature and human
+thoughts, both relatively to human affections, so as
+<pb n='032'/><anchor id='Pg032'/>
+to cause the production of as great immediate
+pleasure in each part, as is compatible with the
+largest possible sum of pleasure on the whole.
+Now this definition applies equally to painting
+and music as to poetry; and in truth the term
+poetry is alike applicable to all three. The vehicle
+alone constitutes the difference; and the term
+<q>poetry</q> is rightly applied by eminence to
+measured words, only because the sphere of their
+action is far wider, the power of giving permanence
+to them much more certain, and incomparably
+greater the facility, by which men, not
+defective by nature or disease, may be enabled to
+derive habitual pleasure and instruction from
+them. On my mentioning these considerations
+to a painter of great genius, who had been, from
+a most honourable enthusiasm, extolling his own
+art, he was so struck with their truth, that he
+exclaimed, <q>I want no other arguments;&mdash;poetry,
+that is, verbal poetry, must be the greatest; all
+that proves final causes in the world, proves this;
+it would be shocking to think otherwise!</q>&mdash;And
+in truth, deeply, O! far more than words can
+express, as I venerate the Last Judgment and the
+Prophets of Michel Angelo Buonarotti,&mdash;yet the
+very pain which I repeatedly felt as I lost myself
+in gazing upon them, the painful consideration
+that their having been painted in
+<foreign lang="it" rend="font-style: italic">fresco</foreign> was the
+sole cause that they had not been abandoned to all
+the accidents of a dangerous transportation to a
+distant capital, and that the same caprice, which
+made the Neapolitan soldiery destroy all the exquisite
+masterpieces on the walls of the church of
+<hi rend='italic'>Trinitado Monte</hi>, after the retreat of their antagonist
+barbarians, might as easily have made vanish
+<pb n='033'/><anchor id='Pg033'/>
+the rooms and open gallery of Raffael, and the yet
+more unapproachable wonders of the sublime
+Florentine in the Sixtine Chapel, forced upon my
+mind the reflection: How grateful the human
+race ought to be that the works of Euclid, Newton,
+Plato, Milton, Shakespeare, are not subjected
+to similar contingencies,&mdash;that they and their
+fellows, and the great, though inferior, peerage of
+undying intellect, are secured;&mdash;secured even
+from a second irruption of Goths and Vandals, in
+addition to many other safeguards, by the vast
+empire of English language, laws, and religion
+founded in America, through the overflow of the
+power and the virtue of my country;&mdash;and that
+now the great and certain works of genuine fame
+can only cease to act for mankind, when men
+themselves cease to be men, or when the planet on
+which they exist, shall have altered its relations,
+or have ceased to be. Lord Bacon, in the language
+of the gods, if I may use an Homeric phrase, has
+expressed a similar thought:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Lastly, leaving the vulgar arguments, that by learning man excelleth
+man in that wherein man excelleth beasts; that by learning
+man ascendeth to the heavens and their motions, where in body he
+cannot come, and the like; let us conclude with the dignity and
+excellency of knowledge and learning in that whereunto man's
+nature doth most aspire, which is immortality or continuance: for
+to this tendeth generation, and raising of houses and families; to
+this tend buildings, foundations, and monuments; to this tendeth
+the desire of memory, fame, and celebration, and in effect the
+strength of all other human desires. We see then how far the
+monuments of wit and learning are more durable than the monuments
+of power, or of the hands. For have not the verses of Homer
+continued twenty-five hundred years, or more, without the loss of a
+syllable or letter; during which time, infinite palaces, temples,
+castles, cities, have been decayed and demolished? It is not possible
+to have the true pictures or statues of Cyrus, Alexander,
+Cæsar; no, nor of the kings or great personages of much later
+years; for the originals cannot last, and the copies cannot but lose
+of the life and truth. But the images of men's wits and knowledges
+<pb n='034'/><anchor id='Pg034'/>
+remain in books, exempted from the wrong of time, and capable of
+perpetual renovation. Neither are they fitly to be called images,
+because they generate still, and cast their seeds in the minds of
+others, provoking and causing infinite actions and opinions in succeeding
+ages: so that, if the invention of the ship was thought so
+noble, which carrieth riches and commodities from place to place,
+and consociateth the most remote regions in participation of their
+fruits; how much more are letters to be magnified, which, as ships,
+pass through the vast seas of time, and make ages so distant to participate
+of the wisdom, illuminations, and inventions, the one of the
+other?</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+But let us now consider what the drama should
+be. And first, it is not a copy, but an imitation, of
+nature. This is the universal principle of the fine
+arts. In all well laid out grounds what delight do
+we feel from that balance and antithesis of feelings
+and thoughts! How natural! we say;&mdash;but the
+very wonder that caused the exclamation, implies
+that we perceived art at the same moment. We
+catch the hint from nature itself. Whenever in
+mountains or cataracts we discover a likeness to
+any thing artificial which yet we know is not artificial&mdash;what
+pleasure! And so it is in appearances
+known to be artificial, which appear to be natural.
+This applies in due degrees, regulated by steady
+good sense, from a clump of trees to the <hi rend='italic'>Paradise
+Lost</hi> or <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>. It would be easy to apply it to
+painting and even, though with greater abstraction
+of thought, and by more subtle yet equally just
+analogies&mdash;to music. But this belongs to others;
+suffice it that one great principle is common to all
+the fine arts, a principle which probably is the
+condition of all consciousness, without which we
+should feel and imagine only by discontinuous
+moments, and be plants or brute animals instead
+of men;&mdash;I mean that ever-varying balance, or
+balancing, of images, notions, or feelings, conceived
+as in opposition to each other;&mdash;in short, the
+<pb n='035'/><anchor id='Pg035'/>
+perception of identity and contrariety; the least
+degree of which constitutes likeness, the greatest
+absolute difference; but the infinite gradations between
+these two form all the play and all the
+interest of our intellectual and moral being, till it
+leads us to a feeling and an object more awful than
+it seems to me compatible with even the present subject
+to utter aloud, though I am most desirous to
+suggest it. For there alone are all things at once
+different and the same; there alone, as the principle
+of all things, does distinction exist unaided
+by division; there are will and reason, succession
+of time and unmoving eternity, infinite change and
+ineffable rest!&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Return Alpheus! the dread voice is past</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Which shrunk thy streams!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 4">&mdash;&mdash;<q rend="pre">Thou honour'd flood,</q></l>
+<l>Smooth-<emph>flowing</emph> Avon, crown'd with vocal reeds,</l>
+<l>That strain I heard, was of a higher mood!&mdash;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But now my <emph>voice</emph> proceeds.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+We may divide a dramatic poet's characteristics
+before we enter into the component merits of any
+one work, and with reference only to those things
+which are to be the materials of all, into language,
+passion, and character; always bearing in mind
+that these must act and react on each other,&mdash;the
+language inspired by the passion, and the language
+and the passion modified and differenced by the
+character. To the production of the highest excellencies
+in these three, there are requisite in the
+mind of the author;&mdash;good sense, talent, sensibility,
+imagination;&mdash;and to the perfection of a
+work we should add two faculties of lesser importance,
+yet necessary for the ornaments and foliage
+of the column and the roof&mdash;fancy and a quick
+sense of beauty.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='036'/><anchor id='Pg036'/>
+
+<p>
+As to language;&mdash;it cannot be supposed that
+the poet should make his characters say all that
+they would, or that, his whole drama considered,
+each scene, or paragraph should be such as, on cool
+examination, we can conceive it likely that men in
+such situations would say, in that order, or with
+that perfection. And yet, according to my feelings,
+it is a very inferior kind of poetry, in which,
+as in the French tragedies, men are made to talk
+in a style which few indeed even of the wittiest
+can be supposed to converse in, and which both is,
+and on a moment's reflection appears to be, the
+natural produce of the hot-bed of vanity, namely,
+the closet of an author, who is actuated originally
+by a desire to excite surprise and wonderment at
+his own superiority to other men,&mdash;instead of
+having felt so deeply on certain subjects, or in
+consequence of certain imaginations, as to make it
+almost a necessity of his nature to seek for sympathy,&mdash;no
+doubt, with that honourable desire of
+permanent action, which distinguishes genius.&mdash;Where
+then is the difference?&mdash;In this that each
+part should be proportionate, though the whole
+may be perhaps, impossible. At all events, it
+should be compatible with sound sense and logic in
+the mind of the poet himself.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is to be lamented that we judge of books by
+books, instead of referring what we read to our
+own experience. One great use of books is to
+make their contents a motive for observation. The
+German tragedies have in some respects been justly
+ridiculed. In them the dramatist often becomes a
+novelist in his directions to the actors, and thus
+degrades tragedy into pantomime. Yet still the
+consciousness of the poet's mind must be diffused
+<pb n='037'/><anchor id='Pg037'/>
+over that of the reader or spectator; but he himself,
+according to his genius, elevates us, and by
+being always in keeping, prevents us from perceiving
+any strangeness, though we feel great
+exultation. Many different kinds of style may be
+admirable, both in different men, and in different
+parts of the same poem.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+See the different language which strong feelings
+may justify in Shylock, and learn from Shakespeare's
+conduct of that character the terrible force
+of every plain and calm diction, when known to
+proceed from a resolved and impassioned man.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is especially with reference to the drama, and
+its characteristics in any given nation, or at any
+particular period, that the dependence of genius on
+the public taste becomes a matter of the deepest
+importance. I do not mean that taste which
+springs merely from caprice or fashionable imitation,
+and which, in fact, genius can, and by degrees
+will, create for itself; but that which arises out of
+wide-grasping and heart-enrooted causes, which
+is epidemic, and in the very air that all breathe.
+This it is which kills, or withers, or corrupts.
+Socrates, indeed, might walk arm in arm with
+Hygeia, whilst pestilence, with a thousand furies
+running to and fro, and clashing against each
+other in a complexity and agglomeration of horrors,
+was shooting her darts of fire and venom all around
+him. Even such was Milton; yea, and such, in
+spite of all that has been babbled by his critics in
+pretended excuse for his damning, because for them
+too profound excellencies,&mdash;such was Shakespeare.
+But alas! the exceptions prove the rule. For who
+will dare to force his way out of the crowd,&mdash;not
+of the mere vulgar,&mdash;but of the vain and banded
+<pb n='038'/><anchor id='Pg038'/>
+aristocracy of intellect, and presume to join the
+almost supernatural beings that stand by themselves
+aloof?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Of this diseased epidemic influence there are two
+forms especially preclusive of tragic worth. The
+first is the necessary growth of a sense and love of
+the ludicrous, and a morbid sensibility of the assimilative
+power,&mdash;an inflammation produced by
+cold and weakness,&mdash;which in the boldest bursts of
+passion will lie in wait for a jeer at any phrase,
+that may have an accidental coincidence in the
+mere words with something base or trivial. For
+instance,&mdash;to express woods, not on a plain, but
+clothing a hill, which overlooks a valley, or dell,
+or river, or the sea,&mdash;the trees rising one above
+another, as the spectators in an ancient theatre,&mdash;I
+know no other word in our language (bookish
+and pedantic terms out of the question), but <emph>hanging</emph>
+woods, the
+<foreign lang="la" rend="font-style: italic">sylvæ superimpendentes</foreign>
+of Catullus;
+yet let some wit call out in a slang tone,&mdash;<q>the
+gallows!</q> and a peal of laughter would damn the
+play. Hence it is that so many dull pieces have
+had a decent run, only because nothing unusual
+above, or absurd below, mediocrity furnished an
+occasion,&mdash;a spark for the explosive materials collected
+behind the orchestra. But it would take a
+volume of no ordinary size, however laconically the
+sense were expressed, if it were meant to instance
+the effects, and unfold all the causes, of this disposition
+upon the moral, intellectual, and even
+physical character of a people, with its influences
+on domestic life and individual deportment. A
+good document upon this subject would be the
+history of Paris society and of French, that is,
+Parisian, literature from the commencement of the
+<pb n='039'/><anchor id='Pg039'/>
+latter half of the reign of Louis XIV. to that of
+Buonaparte, compared with the preceding philosophy
+and poetry even of Frenchmen themselves.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The second form, or more properly, perhaps,
+another distinct cause, of this diseased disposition
+is matter of exultation to the philanthropist and
+philosopher, and of regret to the poet, the painter,
+and the statuary alone, and to them only as poets,
+painters, and statuaries;&mdash;namely, the security, the
+comparative equability, and ever increasing sameness
+of human life. Men are now so seldom thrown
+into wild circumstances, and violences of excitement,
+that the language of such states, the laws of
+association of feeling with thought, the starts and
+strange far-flights of the assimilative power on the
+slightest and least obvious likeness presented by
+thoughts, words, or objects,&mdash;these are all judged
+of by authority, not by actual experience,&mdash;by what
+men have been accustomed to regard as symbols of
+these states, and not the natural symbols, or self-manifestations
+of them.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Even so it is in the language of man, and in
+that of nature. The sound <hi rend='italic'>sun</hi>, or the figures
+<hi rend='italic'>s</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>u</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>n</hi>, are purely arbitrary modes of recalling the
+object, and for visual mere objects they are not
+only sufficient, but have infinite advantages from
+their very nothingness <hi rend='italic'>per se</hi>. But the language
+of nature is a subordinate <hi rend='italic'>Logos</hi>, that was in the
+beginning, and was with the thing it represented,
+and was the thing it represented.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Now the language of Shakespeare, in his <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>
+for instance, is a something intermediate between
+these two; or rather it is the former blended with
+the latter,&mdash;the arbitrary, not merely recalling the
+cold notion of the thing, but expressing the reality
+<pb n='040'/><anchor id='Pg040'/>
+of it, and, as arbitrary language is an heir-loom of
+the human race, being itself a part of that which
+it manifests. What shall I deduce from the preceding
+positions? Even this,&mdash;the appropriate,
+the never to be too much valued advantage of the
+theatre, if only the actors were what we know they
+have been,&mdash;a delightful, yet most effectual remedy
+for this dead palsy of the public mind. What
+would appear mad or ludicrous in a book, when presented
+to the senses under the form of reality, and
+with the truth of nature, supplies a species of actual
+experience. This is indeed the special privilege of
+a great actor over a great poet. No part was ever
+played in perfection, but nature justified herself in
+the hearts of all her children, in what state soever
+they were, short of absolute moral exhaustion, or
+downright stupidity. There is no time given to
+ask questions, or to pass judgments; we are taken
+by storm, and, though in the histrionic art many a
+clumsy counterfeit, by caricature of one or two
+features, may gain applause as a fine likeness, yet
+never was the very thing rejected as a counterfeit.
+O! when I think of the inexhaustible mine of virgin
+treasure in our Shakespeare, that I have been
+almost daily reading him since I was ten years old,&mdash;that
+the thirty intervening years have been unintermittingly
+and not fruitlessly employed in
+the study of the Greek, Latin, English, Italian,
+Spanish, and German <hi rend='italic'>belle lettrists</hi>, and the last
+fifteen years in addition, far more intensely in the
+analysis of the laws of life and reason as they exist
+in man,&mdash;and that upon every step I have made
+forward in taste, in acquisition of facts from history
+or my own observation, and in knowledge of the
+different laws of being and their apparent exceptions,
+<pb n='041'/><anchor id='Pg041'/>
+from accidental collision of disturbing forces,&mdash;that
+at every new accession of information, after
+every successful exercise of meditation, and every
+fresh presentation of experience, I have unfailingly
+discovered a proportionate increase of wisdom and
+intuition in Shakespeare;&mdash;when I know this, and
+know too, that by a conceivable and possible, though
+hardly to be expected, arrangement of the British
+theatres, not all, indeed, but a large, a very large,
+proportion of this indefinite all&mdash;(round which no
+comprehension has yet drawn the line of circumscription,
+so as to say to itself, <q>I have seen the
+whole</q>)&mdash;might be sent into the heads and hearts&mdash;into
+the very souls of the mass of mankind, to
+whom, except by this living comment and interpretation,
+it must remain for ever a sealed volume,
+a deep well without a wheel or a windlass;&mdash;it
+seems to me a pardonable enthusiasm to steal away
+from sober likelihood, and share in so rich a feast
+in the faery world of possibility! Yet even in the
+grave cheerfulness of a circumspect hope, much,
+very much, might be done; enough, assuredly,
+to furnish a kind and strenuous nature with ample
+motives for the attempt to effect what may be
+effected.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='043'/><anchor id='Pg043'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Shakespeare, A Poet Generally.</head>
+
+<p>
+Clothed in radiant armour, and authorized by
+titles sure and manifold, as a poet, Shakespeare
+came forward to demand the throne of fame, as the
+dramatic poet of England. His excellences compelled
+even his contemporaries to seat him on that
+throne, although there were giants in those days
+contending for the same honour. Hereafter I
+would fain endeavour to make out the title of the
+English drama as created by, and existing in,
+Shakespeare, and its right to the supremacy of
+dramatic excellence in general. But he had shown
+himself a poet, previously to his appearance as a
+dramatic poet; and had no <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>,
+no <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>, no <hi rend='italic'>Henry IV.</hi>,
+no <hi rend='italic'>Twelfth Night</hi> ever appeared, we
+must have admitted that Shakespeare possessed the
+chief, if not every, requisite of a poet,&mdash;deep feeling
+and exquisite sense of beauty, both as exhibited
+to the eye in the combinations of form, and to the
+ear in sweet and appropriate melody; that these
+feelings were under the command of his own will;
+that in his very first productions he projected his
+mind out of his own particular being, and felt, and
+made others feel, on subjects no way connected
+with himself, except by force of contemplation and
+that sublime faculty by which a great mind becomes
+that on which it meditates. To this must be
+added that affectionate love of nature and natural
+<pb n='044'/><anchor id='Pg044'/>
+objects, without which no man could have observed
+so steadily, or painted so truly and passionately,
+the very minutest beauties of the external world:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And when thou hast on foot the purblind hare,</q></l>
+<l>Mark the poor wretch; to overshoot his troubles,</l>
+<l>How he outruns the wind, and with what care,</l>
+<l>He cranks and crosses with a thousand doubles;</l>
+<l>The many musits through the which he goes</l>
+<l>Are like a labyrinth to amaze his foes.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Sometimes he runs among the flock of sheep,</q></l>
+<l>To make the cunning hounds mistake their smell;</l>
+<l>And sometime where earth-delving conies keep,</l>
+<l>To stop the loud pursuers in their yell;</l>
+<l>And sometime sorteth with the herd of deer:</l>
+<l>Danger deviseth shifts, wit waits on fear.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">For there his smell with others' being mingled,</q></l>
+<l>The hot scent-snuffing hounds are driven to doubt,</l>
+<l>Ceasing their clamorous cry, till they have singled</l>
+<l>With much ado, the cold fault cleanly out,</l>
+<l>Then do they spend their mouths; echo replies,</l>
+<l>As if another chase were in the skies.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">By this poor Wat far off, upon a hill,</q></l>
+<l>Stands on his hinder legs with listening ear,</l>
+<l>To harken if his foes pursue him still:</l>
+<l>Anon their loud alarums he doth hear,</l>
+<l>And now his grief may be compared well</l>
+<l>To one sore-sick, that hears the passing bell.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Then shalt thou see the dew-bedabbled wretch</q></l>
+<l>Turn, and return, indenting with the way:</l>
+<l>Each envious briar his weary legs doth scratch,</l>
+<l>Each shadow makes him stop, each murmur stay.</l>
+<l>For misery is trodden on by many,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And being low, never relieved by any.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Venus and Adonis.</hi></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+And the preceding description:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">But lo! from forth a copse that neighbours by,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">A breeding jennet, lusty, young and proud,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+is much more admirable, but in parts less fitted for
+quotation.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='045'/><anchor id='Pg045'/>
+
+<p>
+Moreover Shakespeare had shown that he possessed
+fancy, considered as the faculty of bringing
+together images dissimilar in the main by some one
+point or more of likeness, as in such a passage as
+this:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Full gently now she takes him by the hand,</q></l>
+<l>A lily prisoned in a jail of snow,</l>
+<l>Or ivory in an alabaster band:</l>
+<l><q rend="post">So white a friend ingirts so white a foe!</q>&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+And still mounting the intellectual ladder, he
+had as unequivocally proved the indwelling in his
+mind of imagination, or the power by which one
+image or feeling is made to modify many others,
+and by a sort of fusion to force many into one;&mdash;that
+which afterwards showed itself in such might
+and energy in Lear, where the deep anguish of a
+father spreads the feeling of ingratitude and cruelty
+over the very elements of heaven;&mdash;and which,
+combining many circumstances into one moment of
+consciousness, tends to produce that ultimate end
+of all human thought and human feeling, unity,
+and thereby the reduction of the spirit to its principle
+and fountain, who is alone truly one. Various
+are the workings of this the greatest faculty of the
+human mind, both passionate and tranquil. In
+its tranquil and purely pleasurable operation, it
+acts chiefly by creating out of many things, as they
+would have appeared in the description of an ordinary
+mind, detailed in unimpassioned succession, a
+oneness, even as nature, the greatest of poets, acts
+upon us, when we open our eyes upon an extended
+prospect. Thus the flight of Adonis in the dusk of
+the evening:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Look! how a bright star shooteth from the sky;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">So glides he in the night from Venus' eye!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='046'/><anchor id='Pg046'/>
+
+<p>
+How many images and feelings are here brought
+together without effort and without discord, in the
+beauty of Adonis, the rapidity of his flight, the
+yearning, yet hopelessness, of the enamoured gazer,
+while a shadowy ideal character is thrown over the
+whole! Or this power acts by impressing the stamp
+of humanity, and of human feelings, on inanimate
+or mere natural objects:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Lo! here the gentle lark, weary of rest,</q></l>
+<l>From his moist cabinet mounts up on high,</l>
+<l>And wakes the morning, from whose silver breast</l>
+<l>The sun ariseth in his majesty,</l>
+<l>Who doth the world so gloriously behold,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The cedar-tops and hills seem burnish'd gold.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Or again, it acts by so carrying on the eye of
+the reader as to make him almost lose the consciousness
+of words,&mdash;to make him see every thing
+flashed, as Wordsworth has grandly and appropriately
+said:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Flashed</hi> upon the inward eye</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Which is the bliss of solitude;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and this without exciting any painful or laborious
+attention, without any anatomy of description (a
+fault not uncommon in descriptive poetry),&mdash;but
+with the sweetness and easy movement of nature.
+This energy is an absolute essential of poetry, and
+of itself would constitute a poet, though not one of
+the highest class;&mdash;it is, however, a most hopeful
+symptom, and the <hi rend='italic'>Venus and Adonis</hi> is one continued
+specimen of it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this beautiful poem there is an endless activity
+of thought in all the possible associations of thought
+with thought, thought with feeling, or with words,
+of feelings with feelings, and of words with words.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Even as the sun, with purple-colour'd face,</q></l>
+<l>Had ta'en his last leave of the weeping morn,</l>
+<pb n='047'/><anchor id='Pg047'/>
+<l>Rose-cheek'd Adonis hied him to the chase:</l>
+<l>Hunting he loved, but love he laughed to scorn.</l>
+<l>Sick-thoughted Venus makes amain unto him,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And like a bold-faced suitor 'gins to woo him.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Remark the humanizing imagery and circumstances
+of the first two lines, and the activity of
+thought in the play of words in the fourth line.
+The whole stanza presents at once the time, the
+appearance of the morning, and the two persons
+distinctly characterised, and in six simple lines
+puts the reader in possession of the whole argument
+of the poem.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Over one arm the lusty courser's rein,</q></l>
+<l>Under the other was the tender boy,</l>
+<l>Who blush'd and pouted in a dull disdain,</l>
+<l>With leaden appetite, unapt to toy,</l>
+<l>She red and hot, as coals of glowing fire,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">He red for shame, but frosty to desire:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This stanza and the two following afford good instances
+of that poetic power, which I mentioned
+above, of making every thing present to the imagination&mdash;both
+the forms, and the passions which
+modify those forms, either actually, as in the representations
+of love or anger, or other human affections;
+or imaginatively, by the different manner in
+which inanimate objects, or objects unimpassioned
+themselves, are caused to be seen by the mind in
+moments of strong excitement, and according to
+the kind of the excitement,&mdash;whether of jealousy,
+or rage, or love, in the only appropriate sense of
+the word, or of the lower impulses of our nature, or
+finally of the poetic feeling itself. It is, perhaps,
+chiefly in the power of producing and reproducing
+the latter that the poet stands distinct.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The subject of the <hi rend='italic'>Venus and Adonis</hi> is unpleasing;
+but the poem itself is for that very reason
+<pb n='048'/><anchor id='Pg048'/>
+the more illustrative of Shakespeare. There are
+men who can write passages of deepest pathos and
+even sublimity on circumstances personal to themselves
+and stimulative of their own passions; but
+they are not, therefore, on this account poets.
+Read that magnificent burst of woman's patriotism
+and exultation, <hi rend='italic'>Deborah's Song of Victory</hi>; it is
+glorious, but nature is the poet there. It is quite
+another matter to become all things and yet remain
+the same,&mdash;to make the changeful god be felt in the
+river, the lion, and the flame;&mdash;this it is, that is
+the true imagination. Shakespeare writes in this
+poem, as if he were of another planet, charming
+you to gaze on the movements of Venus and Adonis,
+as you would on the twinkling dances of two vernal
+butterflies.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Finally, in this poem and the <hi rend='italic'>Rape of Lucrece</hi>,
+Shakespeare gave ample proof of his possession of
+a most profound, energetic, and philosophical mind,
+without which he might have pleased, but could
+not have been a great dramatic poet. Chance and
+the necessity of his genius combined to lead him to
+the drama his proper province: in his conquest of
+which we should consider both the difficulties which
+opposed him, and the advantages by which he was
+assisted.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Shakespeare's Judgment equal to his Genius.</head>
+
+<p>
+Thus then Shakespeare appears, from his <hi rend='italic'>Venus
+and Adonis</hi> and <hi rend='italic'>Rape of Lucrece</hi> alone, apart from
+all his great works, to have possessed all the conditions
+of the true poet. Let me now proceed to
+destroy, as far as may be in my power, the popular
+notion that he was a great dramatist by mere instinct,
+<pb n='049'/><anchor id='Pg049'/>
+that he grew immortal in his own despite,
+and sank below men of second or third rate power,
+when he attempted aught beside the drama&mdash;even
+as bees construct their cells and manufacture their
+honey to admirable perfection; but would in vain
+attempt to build a nest. Now this mode of reconciling
+a compelled sense of inferiority with a feeling
+of pride, began in a few pedants, who having read
+that Sophocles was the great model of tragedy, and
+Aristotle the infallible dictator of its rules, and
+finding that the <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi> and other
+master-pieces were neither in imitation of Sophocles,
+nor in obedience to Aristotle,&mdash;and not having
+(with one or two exceptions) the courage to affirm,
+that the delight which their country received from
+generation to generation, in defiance of the alterations
+of circumstances and habits, was wholly
+groundless,&mdash;took upon them, as a happy medium
+and refuge, to talk of Shakespeare as a sort of
+beautiful <hi rend='italic'>lusus naturæ</hi>, a delightful monster,&mdash;wild,
+indeed, and without taste or judgment, but like the
+inspired idiots so much venerated in the East,
+uttering, amid the strangest follies, the sublimest
+truths. In nine places out of ten in which I find
+his awful name mentioned, it is with some epithet
+of <q>wild,</q> <q>irregular,</q> <q>pure child of nature,</q>
+&amp;c. If all this be true, we must submit to it;
+though to a thinking mind it cannot but be painful
+to find any excellence, merely human, thrown
+out of all human analogy, and thereby leaving us
+neither rules for imitation, nor motives to imitate;&mdash;but
+if false, it is a dangerous falsehood;&mdash;for it
+affords a refuge to secret self-conceit,&mdash;enables a
+vain man at once to escape his reader's indignation
+by general swoln panegyrics, and merely by his
+<pb n='050'/><anchor id='Pg050'/>
+<hi rend='italic'>ipse dixit</hi> to treat, as contemptible, what he has not
+intellect enough to comprehend, or soul to feel,
+without assigning any reason, or referring his
+opinion to any demonstrative principle;&mdash;thus leaving
+Shakespeare as a sort of grand Lama, adored
+indeed, and his very excrements prized as relics,
+but with no authority or real influence. I grieve
+that every late voluminous edition of his works
+would enable me to substantiate the present charge
+with a variety of facts, one-tenth of which would
+of themselves exhaust the time allotted to me.
+Every critic, who has or has not made a collection
+of black letter books&mdash;in itself a useful
+and respectable amusement,&mdash;puts on the seven-league
+boots of self-opinion, and strides at once
+from an illustrator into a supreme judge, and
+blind and deaf, fills his three-ounce phial at the
+waters of Niagara; and determines positively the
+greatness of the cataract to be neither more nor
+less than his three-ounce phial has been able to
+receive.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I think this a very serious subject. It is my
+earnest desire&mdash;my passionate endeavour&mdash;to enforce
+at various times and by various arguments
+and instances the close and reciprocal connection
+of just taste with pure morality. Without that
+acquaintance with the heart of man, or that docility
+and childlike gladness to be made acquainted
+with it, which those only can have, who dare look
+at their own hearts&mdash;and that with a steadiness
+which religion only has the power of reconciling
+with sincere humility;&mdash;without this, and the
+modesty produced by it, I am deeply convinced
+that no man, however wide his erudition, however
+patient his antiquarian researches, can possibly
+<pb n='051'/><anchor id='Pg051'/>
+understand, or be worthy of understanding, the
+writings of Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Assuredly that criticism of Shakespeare will alone
+be genial which is reverential. The Englishman
+who, without reverence&mdash;a proud and affectionate
+reverence&mdash;can utter the name of William Shakespeare,
+stands disqualified for the office of critic.
+He wants one at least of the very senses, the
+language of which he is to employ, and will discourse
+at best but as a blind man, while the whole
+harmonious creation of light and shade with all
+its subtle interchange of deepening and dissolving
+colours rises in silence to the silent <hi rend='italic'>fiat</hi> of the uprising
+Apollo. However inferior in ability I may
+be to some who have followed me, I own I am
+proud that I was the first in time who publicly
+demonstrated to the full extent of the position,
+that the supposed irregularity and extravagances
+of Shakespeare were the mere dreams of a pedantry
+that arraigned the eagle because it had not the
+dimensions of the swan. In all the successive
+courses of lectures delivered by me, since my first
+attempt at the Royal Institution, it has been, and
+it still remains, my object, to prove that in all
+points from the most important to the most
+minute, the judgment of Shakespeare is commensurate
+with his genius,&mdash;nay, that his genius
+reveals itself in his judgment, as in its most
+exalted form. And the more gladly do I recur
+to this subject from the clear conviction, that to
+judge aright, and with distinct consciousness of
+the grounds of our judgment, concerning the
+works of Shakespeare, implies the power and the
+means of judging rightly of all other works of
+intellect, those of abstract science alone excepted.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='052'/><anchor id='Pg052'/>
+
+<p>
+It is a painful truth, that not only individuals,
+but even whole nations, are ofttimes so enslaved
+to the habits of their education and immediate
+circumstances, as not to judge disinterestedly even
+on those subjects, the very pleasure arising from
+which consists in its disinterestedness, namely, on
+subjects of taste and polite literature. Instead of
+deciding concerning their own modes and customs
+by any rule of reason, nothing appears rational,
+becoming, or beautiful to them, but what coincides
+with the peculiarities of their education. In this
+narrow circle, individuals may attain to exquisite
+discrimination, as the French critics have done in
+their own literature; but a true critic can no more
+be such without placing himself on some central
+point, from which he may command the whole,&mdash;that
+is, some general rule, which, founded in
+reason, or the faculties common to all men, must
+therefore apply to each,&mdash;than an astronomer can
+explain the movements of the solar system without
+taking his stand in the sun. And let me remark,
+that this will not tend to produce despotism, but,
+on the contrary, true tolerance, in the critic. He
+will, indeed, require, as the spirit and substance of
+a work, something true in human nature itself,
+and independent of all circumstances; but in the
+mode of applying it, he will estimate genius and
+judgment according to the felicity with which the
+imperishable soul of intellect shall have adapted
+itself to the age, the place, and the existing manners.
+The error he will expose, lies in reversing
+this, and holding up the mere circumstances as
+perpetual to the utter neglect of the power which
+can alone animate them. For art cannot exist
+without, or apart from nature; and what has man
+<pb n='053'/><anchor id='Pg053'/>
+of his own to give to his fellow man, but his own
+thoughts and feelings, and his observations, so far
+as they are modified by his own thoughts or
+feelings?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Let me, then, once more submit this question to
+minds emancipated alike from national, or party,
+or sectarian prejudice:&mdash;Are the plays of Shakespeare
+works of rude uncultivated genius, in
+which the splendour of the parts compensates, if
+aught can compensate, for the barbarous shapelessness
+and irregularity of the whole?&mdash;Or is the
+form equally admirable with the matter, and the
+judgment of the great poet not less deserving our
+wonder than his genius?&mdash;Or, again, to repeat the
+question in other words:&mdash;is Shakespeare a great
+dramatic poet on account only of those beauties
+and excellences which he possesses in common
+with the ancients, but with diminished claims to
+our love and honour to the full extent of his differences
+from them?&mdash;Or are these very differences
+additional proofs of poetic wisdom, at once results
+and symbols of living power as contrasted with
+lifeless mechanism&mdash;of free and rival originality
+as contradistinguished from servile imitation, or,
+more accurately, a blind copying of effects, instead
+of a true imitation of the essential principles?&mdash;Imagine
+not that I am about to oppose genius to
+rules. No! the comparative value of these rules
+is the very cause to be tried. The spirit of poetry,
+like all other living powers, must of necessity
+circumscribe itself by rules, were it only to unite
+power with beauty. It must embody in order to
+reveal itself; but a living body is of necessity an
+organized one; and what is organization but the
+connection of parts in and for a whole, so that
+<pb n='054'/><anchor id='Pg054'/>
+each part is at once end and means?&mdash;This is no
+discovery of criticism;&mdash;it is a necessity of the
+human mind; and all nations have felt and obeyed
+it, in the invention of metre, and measured
+sounds, as the vehicle and <hi rend='italic'>involucrum</hi> of poetry&mdash;itself
+a fellow-growth from the same life,&mdash;even
+as the bark is to the tree!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+No work of true genius dares want its appropriate
+form, neither indeed is there any danger of
+this. As it must not, so genius cannot, be lawless;
+for it is even this that constitutes it genius&mdash;the
+power of acting creatively under laws of its own
+origination. How then comes it that not only
+single <hi rend='italic'>Zoili</hi>, but whole nations have combined in
+unhesitating condemnation of our great dramatist,
+as a sort of African nature, rich in beautiful
+monsters&mdash;as a wild heath where islands of fertility
+look the greener from the surrounding
+waste, where the loveliest plants now shine out
+among unsightly weeds, and now are choked by
+their parasitic growth, so intertwined that we cannot
+disentangle the weed without snapping the
+flower?&mdash;In this statement I have had no reference
+to the vulgar abuse of Voltaire, save as far
+as his charges are coincident with the decisions of
+Shakespeare's own commentators and (so they
+would tell you) almost idolatrous admirers. The
+true ground of the mistake lies in the confounding
+mechanical regularity with organic form. The
+form is mechanic, when on any given material we
+impress a pre-determined form, not necessarily
+arising out of the properties of the material;&mdash;as
+when to a mass of wet clay we give whatever
+shape we wish it to retain when hardened. The
+organic form, on the other hand is innate; it
+<pb n='055'/><anchor id='Pg055'/>
+shapes, as it developes, itself from within, and the
+fulness of its development is one and the same
+with the perfection of its outward form. Such as
+the life is, such is the form. Nature, the prime
+genial artist, inexhaustible in diverse powers, is
+equally inexhaustible in forms;&mdash;each exterior is
+the physiognomy of the being within,&mdash;its true
+image reflected and thrown out from the concave
+mirror;&mdash;and even such is the appropriate excellence
+of her chosen poet, of our own Shakespeare,&mdash;himself
+a nature humanized, a genial
+understanding directing self-consciously a power
+and an implicit wisdom deeper even than our consciousness.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I greatly dislike beauties and selections in
+general; but as proof positive of his unrivalled
+excellence, I should like to try Shakespeare by
+this criterion. Make out your amplest catalogue
+of all the human faculties, as reason or the moral
+law, the will, the feeling of the coincidence of the
+two (a feeling <hi rend='italic'>sui generis et demonstratio demonstrationum</hi>)
+called the conscience, the understanding
+or prudence, wit, fancy, imagination, judgment,&mdash;and
+then of the objects on which these are to be
+employed, as the beauties, the terrors, and the
+seeming caprices of nature, the realities and the
+capabilities, that is, the actual and the ideal, of
+the human mind, conceived as an individual or as
+a social being, as in innocence or in guilt, in a
+play-paradise, or in a war-field of temptation;&mdash;and
+then compare with Shakespeare under each
+of these heads all or any of the writers in prose
+and verse that have ever lived! Who, that is
+competent to judge, doubts the result?&mdash;And ask
+your own hearts&mdash;ask your own common-sense&mdash;to
+<pb n='056'/><anchor id='Pg056'/>
+conceive the possibility of this man being&mdash;I
+say not, the drunken savage of that wretched
+sciolist, whom Frenchmen, to their shame, have
+honoured before their elder and better worthies,&mdash;but
+the anomalous, the wild, the irregular, genius
+of our daily criticism! What! are we to have
+miracles in sport?&mdash;Or, I speak reverently, does
+God choose idiots by whom to convey divine
+truths to man?
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='057'/><anchor id='Pg057'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Recapitulation, And Summary
+Of the Characteristics of Shakespeare's Dramas.</head>
+
+<p>
+In lectures, of which amusement forms a large
+part of the object, there are some peculiar difficulties.
+The architect places his foundation out
+of sight, and the musician tunes his instrument
+before he makes his appearance; but the lecturer
+has to try his chords in the presence of the assembly;
+an operation not likely, indeed, to produce
+much pleasure, but yet indispensably necessary to
+a right understanding of the subject to be developed.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Poetry in essence is as familiar to barbarous as
+to civilized nations. The Laplander and the savage
+Indian are cheered by it as well as the inhabitants
+of London and Paris;&mdash;its spirit takes up and
+incorporates surrounding materials, as a plant
+clothes itself with soil and climate, whilst it exhibits
+the working of a vital principle within
+independent of all accidental circumstances. And
+to judge with fairness of an author's works, we
+ought to distinguish what is inward and essential
+from what is outward and circumstantial. It is
+essential to poetry that it be simple, and appeal to
+the elements and primary laws of our nature;
+that it be sensuous, and by its imagery elicit truth
+at a flash; that it be impassioned, and be able to
+<pb n='058'/><anchor id='Pg058'/>
+move our feelings and awaken our affections. In
+comparing different poets with each other, we
+should inquire which have brought into the fullest
+play our imagination and our reason, or have
+created the greatest excitement and produced the
+completest harmony. If we consider great exquisiteness
+of language and sweetness of metre alone,
+it is impossible to deny to Pope the character of a
+delightful writer; but whether he be a poet, must
+depend upon our definition of the word; and, doubtless,
+if everything that pleases be poetry, Pope's
+satires and epistles must be poetry. This, I must
+say, that poetry, as distinguished from other modes
+of composition, does not rest in metre, and that it is
+not poetry, if it make no appeal to our passions or
+our imagination. One character belongs to all
+true poets, that they write from a principle within,
+not originating in any thing without; and that
+the true poet's work in its form, its shapings, and
+its modifications, is distinguished from all other
+works that assume to belong to the class of poetry,
+as a natural from an artificial flower, or as the
+mimic garden of a child from an enamelled
+meadow. In the former the flowers are broken
+from their stems and stuck into the ground; they
+are beautiful to the eye and fragrant to the sense,
+but their colours soon fade, and their odour is
+transient as the smile of the planter;&mdash;while the
+meadow may be visited again and again with renewed
+delight; its beauty is innate in the soil,
+and its bloom is of the freshness of nature.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The next ground of critical judgment, and point
+of comparison, will be as to how far a given poet
+has been influenced by accidental circumstances.
+As a living poet must surely write, not for the
+<pb n='059'/><anchor id='Pg059'/>
+ages past, but for that in which he lives, and those
+which are to follow, it is on the one hand natural
+that he should not violate, and on the other necessary
+that he should not depend on, the mere
+manners and modes of his day. See how little
+does Shakespeare leave us to regret that he was
+born in his particular age! The great æra in
+modern times was what is called the Restoration
+of Letters;&mdash;the ages preceding it are called the
+dark ages; but it would be more wise, perhaps, to
+call them the ages in which we were in the dark.
+It is usually overlooked that the supposed dark
+period was not universal, but partial and successive,
+or alternate; that the dark age of England
+was not the dark age of Italy, but that one country
+was in its light and vigour, whilst another was
+in its gloom and bondage. But no sooner had the
+Reformation sounded through Europe like the
+blast of an archangel's trumpet, than from king
+to peasant there arose an enthusiasm for knowledge;
+the discovery of a manuscript became the
+subject of an embassy; Erasmus read by moonlight,
+because he could not afford a torch, and
+begged a penny, not for the love of charity, but
+for the love of learning. The three great points
+of attention were religion, morals, and taste; men
+of genius, as well as men of learning, who in this
+age need to be so widely distinguished, then alike
+became copyists of the ancients; and this, indeed,
+was the only way by which the taste of mankind
+could be improved, or their understandings informed.
+Whilst Dante imagined himself a humble
+follower of Virgil, and Ariosto of Homer, they
+were both unconscious of that greater power working
+within them, which in many points carried
+<pb n='060'/><anchor id='Pg060'/>
+them beyond their supposed originals. All great
+discoveries bear the stamp of the age in which
+they are made;&mdash;hence we perceive the effects of
+the purer religion of the moderns visible for the
+most part in their lives; and in reading their
+works we should not content ourselves with the
+mere narratives of events long since passed, but
+should learn to apply their maxims and conduct
+to ourselves.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Having intimated that times and manners lend
+their form and pressure to genius, let me once
+more draw a slight parallel between the ancient
+and modern stage,&mdash;the stages of Greece and of
+England. The Greeks were polytheists; their
+religion was local; almost the only object of all
+their knowledge, art, and taste, was their gods;
+and, accordingly, their productions were, if the
+expression may be allowed, statuesque, whilst
+those of the moderns are picturesque. The Greeks
+reared a structure, which, in its parts, and as a
+whole, filled the mind with the calm and elevated
+impression of perfect beauty, and symmetrical proportion.
+The moderns also produced a whole&mdash;a
+more striking whole; but it was by blending
+materials, and fusing the parts together. And as
+the Pantheon is to York Minster or Westminster
+Abbey, so is Sophocles compared with Shakespeare;
+in the one a completeness, a satisfaction, an excellence,
+on which the mind rests with complacency;
+in the other a multitude of interlaced
+materials, great and little, magnificent and mean,
+accompanied, indeed, with the sense of a falling
+short of perfection, and yet, at the same time, so
+promising of our social and individual progression,
+that we would not, if we could, exchange it for
+<pb n='061'/><anchor id='Pg061'/>
+that repose of the mind which dwells on the forms
+of symmetry in the acquiescent admiration of
+grace. This general characteristic of the ancient
+and modern drama might be illustrated by a
+parallel of the ancient and modern music;&mdash;the
+one consisting of melody arising from a succession
+only of pleasing sounds,&mdash;the modern embracing
+harmony also, the result of combination, and the
+effect of a whole.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I have said, and I say it again, that great as
+was the genius of Shakespeare, his judgment was
+at least equal to it. Of this any one will be convinced,
+who attentively considers those points in
+which the dramas of Greece and England differ,
+from the dissimilitude of circumstances by which
+each was modified and influenced. The Greek
+stage had its origin in the ceremonies of a sacrifice,
+such as of the goat to Bacchus, whom we
+most erroneously regard as merely the jolly god of
+wine;&mdash;for among the ancients he was venerable,
+as the symbol of that power which acts without
+our consciousness in the vital energies of nature&mdash;the
+<hi rend='italic'>vinum mundi</hi>&mdash;as Apollo was that of the conscious
+agency of our intellectual being. The
+heroes of old, under the influences of this Bacchic
+enthusiasm, performed more than human actions;
+hence tales of the favourite champions soon passed
+into dialogue. On the Greek stage the chorus
+was always before the audience; the curtain was
+never dropped, as we should say; and change of
+place being therefore, in general, impossible, the
+absurd notion of condemning it merely as improbable
+in itself was never entertained by any one.
+If we can believe ourselves at Thebes in one act,
+we may believe ourselves at Athens in the next.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='062'/><anchor id='Pg062'/>
+
+<p>
+If a story lasts twenty-four hours or twenty-four
+years, it is equally improbable. There seems to
+be no just boundary but what the feelings prescribe.
+But on the Greek stage, where the same
+persons were perpetually before the audience,
+great judgment was necessary in venturing on
+any such change. The poets never, therefore,
+attempted to impose on the senses by bringing
+places to men, but they did bring men to places,
+as in the well-known instance in the <hi rend='italic'>Eumenides</hi>,
+where, during an evident retirement of the chorus
+from the orchestra, the scene is changed to
+Athens, and Orestes is first introduced in the
+temple of Minerva, and the chorus of Furies come
+in afterwards in pursuit of him.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the Greek drama there were no formal divisions
+into scenes and acts; there were no means,
+therefore, of allowing for the necessary lapse of
+time between one part of the dialogue and another,
+and unity of time in a strict sense was, of course,
+impossible. To overcome that difficulty of accounting
+for time, which is effected on the modern
+stage by dropping a curtain, the judgment and
+great genius of the ancients supplied music and
+measured motion, and with the lyric ode filled up
+the vacuity. In the story of the <hi rend='italic'>Agamemnon</hi> of
+Æschylus, the capture of Troy is supposed to be
+announced by a fire lighted on the Asiatic shore,
+and the transmission of the signal by successive
+beacons to Mycenæ. The signal is first seen at
+the 21st line, and the herald from Troy itself
+enters at the 486th, and Agamemnon himself at
+the 783rd line. But the practical absurdity of
+this was not felt by the audience, who, in imagination
+stretched minutes into hours, while they
+<pb n='063'/><anchor id='Pg063'/>
+listened to the lofty narrative odes of the chorus
+which almost entirely filled up the interspace.
+Another fact deserves attention here, namely, that
+regularly on the Greek stage a drama, or acted
+story, consisted in reality of three dramas, called
+together a trilogy, and performed consecutively in
+the course of one day. Now you may conceive a
+tragedy of Shakespeare's as a trilogy connected in
+one single representation. Divide <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> into three
+parts, and each would be a play with the ancients;
+or take the three Æschylean dramas of <hi rend='italic'>Agamemnon</hi>,
+and divide them into, or call them, as many
+acts, and they together would be one play. The
+first act would comprise the usurpation of Ægisthus,
+and the murder of Agamemnon; the second,
+the revenge of Orestes, and the murder of his
+mother; and the third, the penance and absolution
+of Orestes;&mdash;occupying a period of twenty-two
+years.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The stage in Shakespeare's time was a naked
+room with a blanket for a curtain; but he made
+it a field for monarchs. That law of unity, which
+has its foundations, not in the factitious necessity
+of custom, but in nature itself, the unity of feeling,
+is everywhere and at all times observed by Shakespeare
+in his plays. Read <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>;&mdash;all
+is youth and spring;&mdash;youth with its follies, its
+virtues, its precipitancies;&mdash;spring with its odours,
+its flowers, and its transiency; it is one and the
+same feeling that commences, goes through, and
+ends the play. The old men, the Capulets and
+Montagues, are not common old men; they have
+an eagerness, a heartiness, a vehemence, the effect
+of spring; with Romeo, his change of passion, his
+sudden marriage, and his rash death, are all the
+<pb n='064'/><anchor id='Pg064'/>
+effects of youth;&mdash;whilst in Juliet love has all that
+is tender and melancholy in the nightingale, all
+that is voluptuous in the rose, with whatever is
+sweet in the freshness of spring; but it ends with
+a long deep sigh like the last breeze of the Italian
+evening. This unity of feeling and character pervades
+every drama of Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It seems to me that his plays are distinguished
+from those of all other dramatic poets by the
+following characteristics:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+1. Expectation in preference to surprise. It is
+like the true reading of the passage&mdash;<q>God said,
+Let there be light, and there was <emph>light</emph>;</q>&mdash;not,
+there <emph>was</emph> light. As the feeling with which we
+startle at a shooting star compared with that of
+watching the sunrise at the pre-established moment,
+such and so low is surprise compared with
+expectation.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+2. Signal adherence to the great law of nature,
+that all opposites tend to attract and temper each
+other. Passion in Shakespeare generally displays
+libertinism, but involves morality; and if there
+are exceptions to this, they are, independently of
+their intrinsic value, all of them indicative of individual
+character, and, like the farewell admonitions
+of a parent, have an end beyond the parental
+relation. Thus the Countess's beautiful precepts
+to Bertram, by elevating her character, raise that
+of Helena her favourite, and soften down the point
+in her which Shakespeare does not mean us not to
+see, but to see and to forgive, and at length to
+justify. And so it is in Polonius, who is the personified
+memory of wisdom no longer actually
+possessed. This admirable character is always
+misrepresented on the stage. Shakespeare never
+<pb n='065'/><anchor id='Pg065'/>
+intended to exhibit him as a buffoon; for although
+it was natural that Hamlet&mdash;a young man of fire
+and genius, detesting formality, and disliking
+Polonius on political grounds, as imagining that
+he had assisted his uncle in his usurpation&mdash;should
+express himself satirically, yet this must not be
+taken as exactly the poet's conception of him. In
+Polonius a certain induration of character had
+arisen from long habits of business; but take his
+advice to Laertes, and Ophelia's reverence for his
+memory, and we shall see that he was meant to be
+represented as a statesman somewhat past his
+faculties,&mdash;his recollections of life all full of wisdom,
+and showing a knowledge of human nature,
+whilst what immediately takes place before him,
+and escapes from him, is indicative of weakness.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But as in Homer all the deities are in armour,
+even Venus; so in Shakespeare all the characters
+are strong. Hence real folly and dulness are
+made by him the vehicles of wisdom. There is no
+difficulty for one being a fool to imitate a fool;
+but to be, remain, and speak like a wise man and
+a great wit, and yet so as to give a vivid representation
+of a veritable fool,&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>hic labor, hoc opus est</hi>.
+A drunken constable is not uncommon, nor hard
+to draw; but see and examine what goes to make
+up a Dogberry.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+3. Keeping at all times in the high road of life.
+Shakespeare has no innocent adulteries, no interesting
+incests, no virtuous vice;&mdash;he never renders
+that amiable which religion and reason alike
+teach us to detest, or clothes impurity in the garb
+of virtue, like Beaumont and Fletcher, the Kotzebues
+of the day. Shakespeare's fathers are
+roused by ingratitude, his husbands stung by unfaithfulness;
+<pb n='066'/><anchor id='Pg066'/>
+in him, in short, the affections are
+wounded in those points in which all may, nay,
+must, feel. Let the morality of Shakespeare be
+contrasted with that of the writers of his own, or
+the succeeding age, or of those of the present day,
+who boast their superiority in this respect. No
+one can dispute that the result of such a comparison
+is altogether in favour of Shakespeare;&mdash;even
+the letters of women of high rank in his age were
+often coarser than his writings. If he occasionally
+disgusts a keen sense of delicacy, he never
+injures the mind; he neither excites, nor flatters,
+passion, in order to degrade the subject of it; he
+does not use the faulty thing for a faulty purpose,
+nor carries on warfare against virtue, by causing
+wickedness to appear as no wickedness, through
+the medium of a morbid sympathy with the unfortunate.
+In Shakespeare vice never walks as in
+twilight; nothing is purposely out of its place;&mdash;he
+inverts not the order of nature and propriety,&mdash;does
+not make every magistrate a drunkard or
+glutton, nor every poor man meek, humane, and
+temperate; he has no benevolent butchers, nor any
+sentimental rat-catchers.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+4. Independence of the dramatic interest on the
+plot. The interest in the plot is always in fact on
+account of the characters, not <hi rend='italic'>vice versa</hi>, as in
+almost all other writers; the plot is a mere canvass
+and no more. Hence arises the true justification
+of the same stratagem being used in regard to
+Benedict and Beatrice,&mdash;the vanity in each being
+alike. Take away from the <hi rend='italic'>Much Ado about
+Nothing</hi> all that which is not indispensable to the
+plot, either as having little to do with it, or, at
+best, like Dogberry and his comrades, forced into
+<pb n='067'/><anchor id='Pg067'/>
+the service, when any other less ingeniously
+absurd watchmen and night-constables would have
+answered the mere necessities of the action;&mdash;take
+away Benedict, Beatrice, Dogberry, and the
+reaction of the former on the character of Hero,&mdash;and
+what will remain? In other writers the main
+agent of the plot is always the prominent character;
+in Shakespeare it is so, or is not so, as the
+character is in itself calculated, or not calculated,
+to form the plot. Don John is the main-spring of
+the plot of this play; but he is merely shown and
+then withdrawn.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+5. Independence of the interest on the story as
+the ground-work of the plot. Hence Shakespeare
+never took the trouble of inventing stories. It
+was enough for him to select from those that had
+been already invented or recorded such as had one
+or other, or both, of two recommendations, namely,
+suitableness to his particular purpose, and their
+being parts of popular tradition,&mdash;names of which
+we had often heard, and of their fortunes, and as
+to which all we wanted was, to see the man himself.
+So it is just the man himself&mdash;the Lear,
+the Shylock, the Richard&mdash;that Shakespeare
+makes us for the first time acquainted with.
+Omit the first scene in <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, and yet everything
+will remain; so the first and second scenes in
+the <hi rend='italic'>Merchant of Venice</hi>. Indeed it is universally
+true.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+6. Interfusion of the lyrical&mdash;that which in its
+very essence is poetical&mdash;not only with the dramatic,
+as in the plays of Metastasio, where at the end
+of the scene comes the <hi rend='italic'>aria</hi>
+as the <emph>exit</emph> speech of
+the character,&mdash;but also in and through the dramatic.
+Songs in Shakespeare are introduced as songs
+<pb n='068'/><anchor id='Pg068'/>
+only, just as songs are in real life, beautifully as
+some of them are characteristic of the person who
+has sung or called for them, as Desdemona's
+<q>Willow,</q> and Ophelia's wild snatches, and the
+sweet carollings in <hi rend='italic'>As You Like It</hi>. But the
+whole of the <hi rend='italic'>Midsummer Night's Dream</hi> is one
+continued specimen of the dramatised lyrical.
+And observe how exquisitely the dramatic of Hotspur;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Marry, and I'm glad on't with all my heart;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">I'd rather be a kitten and cry&mdash;mew.</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+melts away into the lyric of Mortimer;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I understand thy looks: that pretty Welsh</q></l>
+<l>Which thou pourest down from these swelling heavens,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">I am too perfect in,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Henry IV.</hi> part i. act iii, sc. 1.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+7. The characters of the <hi rend='italic'>dramatis personæ</hi>, like
+those in real life, are to be inferred by the reader;&mdash;they
+are not told to him. And it is well worth
+remarking that Shakespeare's characters, like those
+in real life, are very commonly misunderstood, and
+almost always understood by different persons in
+different ways. The causes are the same in either
+case. If you take only what the friends of the
+character say, you may be deceived, and still more
+so, if that which his enemies say; nay, even the
+character himself sees himself through the medium
+of his character, and not exactly as he is. Take
+all together, not omitting a shrewd hint from the
+clown or the fool, and perhaps your impression will
+be right; and you may know whether you have in
+fact discovered the poet's own idea, by all the
+speeches receiving light from it, and attesting its
+reality by reflecting it.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='069'/><anchor id='Pg069'/>
+
+<p>
+Lastly, in Shakespeare the heterogeneous is
+united, as it is in nature. You must not suppose
+a pressure or passion always acting on or in the
+character!&mdash;passion in Shakespeare is that by
+which the individual is distinguished from others,
+not that which makes a different kind of him.
+Shakespeare followed the main march of the
+human affections. He entered into no analysis of
+the passions or faiths of men, but assured himself
+that such and such passions and faiths were
+grounded in our common nature, and not in the
+mere accidents of ignorance or disease. This is an
+important consideration, and constitutes our Shakespeare
+the morning star, the guide and the pioneer,
+of true philosophy.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='071'/><anchor id='Pg071'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Outline Of An Introductory Lecture Upon Shakespeare.</head>
+
+<p>
+Of that species of writing termed tragi-comedy,
+much has been produced and doomed to the
+shelf. Shakespeare's comic are continually reacting
+upon his tragic characters. Lear, wandering
+amidst the tempest, has all his feelings of distress
+increased by the overflowings of the wild wit
+of the Fool, as vinegar poured upon wounds exacerbates
+their pain. Thus, even his comic humour
+tends to the development of tragic passion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The next characteristic of Shakespeare is his
+keeping at all times in the high road of life, &amp;c.
+Another evidence of his exquisite judgment is,
+that he seizes hold of popular tales; <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> and the
+<hi rend='italic'>Merchant of Venice</hi> were popular tales, but are so
+excellently managed, that both are the representations
+of men in all countries and of all times.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+His dramas do not arise absolutely out of some
+one extraordinary circumstance, the scenes may
+stand independently of any such one connecting
+incident, as faithful representations of men and
+manners. In his mode of drawing characters
+there are no pompous descriptions of a man by
+himself; his character is to be drawn, as in real
+life, from the whole course of the play, or out of
+the mouths of his enemies or friends. This may
+<pb n='072'/><anchor id='Pg072'/>
+be exemplified in Polonius, whose character has
+been often misrepresented. Shakespeare never
+intended him for a buffoon, &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Another excellence of Shakespeare, in which no
+writer equals him, is in the language of nature.
+So correct is it, that we can see ourselves in every
+page. The style and manner have also that
+felicity, that not a sentence can be read, without
+its being discovered if it is Shakespearian. In
+observation of living characters&mdash;of landlords and
+postilions&mdash;Fielding has great excellence; but in
+drawing from his own heart, and depicting that
+species of character, which no observation could
+teach, he failed in comparison with Richardson,
+who perpetually places himself, as it were, in a
+day-dream. Shakespeare excels in both. Witness
+the accuracy of character in Juliet's name; while
+for the great characters of Iago, Othello, Hamlet,
+Richard III., to which he could never have seen
+anything similar, he seems invariably to have
+asked himself&mdash;How should I act or speak in such
+circumstances? His comic characters are also
+peculiar. A drunken constable was not uncommon;
+but he makes folly a vehicle for wit, as
+in Dogberry: everything is a <hi rend='italic'>sub-stratum</hi> on which
+his genius can erect the mightiest superstructure.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To distinguish that which is legitimate in
+Shakespeare from what does not belong to him,
+we must observe his varied images symbolical of
+novel truth, thrusting by, and seeming to trip up
+each other, from an impetuosity of thought, producing
+a flowing metre, and seldom closing with
+the line. In <hi rend='italic'>Pericles</hi>, a play written fifty years
+before, but altered by Shakespeare, his additions
+may be recognised to half a line, from the metre,
+<pb n='073'/><anchor id='Pg073'/>
+which has the same perfection in the flowing continuity
+of interchangeable metrical pauses in his
+earliest plays, as in <hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's Lost</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Lastly, contrast his <emph>morality</emph> with the writers of
+his own or of the succeeding age, &amp;c. If a man
+speak injuriously of our friend, our vindication of
+him is naturally warm. Shakespeare has been
+accused of profaneness. I for my part have
+acquired from perusal of him, a habit of looking
+into my own heart, and am confident that Shakespeare
+is an author of all others the most calculated
+to make his readers better as well as wiser.
+</p>
+
+<milestone unit="tb" rend="stars: 5"/>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare, possessed of wit, humour, fancy,
+and imagination, built up an outward world from
+the stores within his mind, as the bee finds a hive
+from a thousand sweets gathered from a thousand
+flowers. He was not only a great poet but a great
+philosopher. Richard III., Iago, and Falstaff are
+men who reverse the order of things, who place
+intellect at the head, whereas it ought to follow,
+like Geometry, to prove and to confirm. No man,
+either hero or saint, ever acted from an unmixed
+motive; for let him do what he will rightly, still
+Conscience whispers <q>it is your duty.</q> Richard,
+laughing at conscience and sneering at religion,
+felt a confidence in his intellect, which urged him
+to commit the most horrid crimes, because he felt
+himself, although inferior in form and shape,
+superior to those around him; he felt he possessed
+a power which they had not. Iago, on the same
+principle, conscious of superior intellect, gave
+scope to his envy, and hesitated not to ruin a
+gallant, open, and generous friend in the moment
+<pb n='074'/><anchor id='Pg074'/>
+of felicity, because he was not promoted as he expected.
+Othello was superior in place, but Iago
+felt him to be inferior in intellect, and, unrestrained
+by conscience, trampled upon him. Falstaff,
+not a degraded man of genius, like Burns,
+but a man of degraded genius, with the same
+consciousness of superiority to his companions,
+fastened himself on a young Prince, to prove how
+much his influence on an heir-apparent would
+exceed that of a statesman. With this view he
+hesitated not to adopt the most contemptible of all
+characters, that of an open and professed liar:
+even his sensuality was subservient to his intellect:
+for he appeared to drink sack, that he might have
+occasion to show off his wit. One thing, however,
+worthy of observation, is the perpetual contrast of
+labour in Falstaff to produce wit, with the ease
+with which Prince Henry parries his shafts; and
+the final contempt which such a character deserves
+and receives from the young king, when Falstaff
+exhibits the struggle of inward determination with
+an outward show of humility.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='075'/><anchor id='Pg075'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Order Of Shakespeare's Plays.</head>
+
+<p>
+Various attempts have been made to arrange
+the plays of Shakespeare, each according to
+its priority in time, by proofs derived from external
+documents. How unsuccessful these attempts have
+been might easily be shewn, not only from the
+widely different results arrived at by men, all
+deeply versed in the black-letter books, old plays,
+pamphlets, manuscript records, and catalogues of
+that age, but also from the fallacious and unsatisfactory
+nature of the facts and assumptions on
+which the evidence rests. In that age, when the
+press was chiefly occupied with controversial or
+practical divinity,&mdash;when the law, the Church, and
+the State engrossed all honour and respectability,&mdash;when
+a degree of disgrace, <hi rend='italic'>levior quædam infamiæ
+macula</hi>, was attached to the publication of poetry,
+and even to have sported with the Muse, as a
+private relaxation, was supposed to be&mdash;a venial
+fault, indeed, yet&mdash;something beneath the gravity
+of a wise man,&mdash;when the professed poets were so
+poor, that the very expenses of the press demanded
+the liberality of some wealthy individual, so that
+two-thirds of Spenser's poetic works, and those
+most highly praised by his learned admirers and
+friends, remained for many years in manuscript,
+and in manuscript perished,&mdash;when the amateurs
+of the stage were comparatively few, and therefore
+for the greater part more or less known to each
+<pb n='076'/><anchor id='Pg076'/>
+other,&mdash;when we know that the plays of Shakespeare,
+both during and after his life, were the
+property of the stage, and published by the
+players, doubtless according to their notions of
+acceptability with the visitants of the theatre,&mdash;in
+such an age, and under such circumstances, can an
+allusion or reference to any drama or poem in the
+publication of a contemporary be received as conclusive
+evidence, that such drama or poem had at
+that time been published? Or, further, can the
+priority of publication itself prove anything in
+favour of actually prior composition?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+We are tolerably certain, indeed, that the <hi rend='italic'>Venus
+and Adonis</hi>, and the <hi rend='italic'>Rape of Lucrece</hi>, were his two
+earliest poems, and though not printed until 1593,
+in the twenty-ninth year of his age, yet there can
+be little doubt that they had remained by him in
+manuscript many years. For Mr. Malone has
+made it highly probable that he had commenced
+as a writer for the stage in 1591, when he was
+twenty-seven years old, and Shakespeare himself
+assures us that the <hi rend='italic'>Venus and Adonis</hi> was the first
+heir of his invention.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Baffled, then, in the attempt to derive any satisfaction
+from outward documents, we may easily
+stand excused if we turn our researches towards
+the internal evidences furnished by the writings
+themselves, with no other positive <hi rend='italic'>data</hi> than the
+known facts that the <hi rend='italic'>Venus and Adonis</hi> was printed
+in 1593, the <hi rend='italic'>Rape of Lucrece</hi> in 1594, and that the
+<hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi> had appeared in 1595,&mdash;and
+with no other presumptions than that the poems,
+his very first productions, were written many
+years earlier&mdash;(for who can believe that Shakespeare
+could have remained to his twenty-ninth or
+<pb n='077'/><anchor id='Pg077'/>
+thirtieth year without attempting poetic composition
+of any kind?),&mdash;and that between these and
+<hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi> there had intervened one or two
+other dramas, or the chief materials, at least of
+them, although they may very possibly have
+appeared after the success of the <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>,
+and some other circumstances, had given the poet
+an authority with the proprietors, and created a
+prepossession in his favour with the theatrical
+audiences.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+CLASSIFICATION ATTEMPTED, 1802.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+FIRST EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>The London Prodigal.</item>
+<item>Cromwell.</item>
+<item>Henry VI., three parts, first edition.</item>
+<item>The old King John.</item>
+<item>Edward III.</item>
+<item>The old Taming of the Shrew.</item>
+<item>Pericles.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+All these are transition works, <hi rend='italic'>Uebergangswerke</hi>;
+not his, yet of him.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+SECOND EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>All's Well that Ends Well;&mdash;but afterwards
+worked up afresh (<hi rend='italic'>umgearbeitet</hi>),
+especially Parolles.</item>
+<item>The Two Gentlemen of Verona; a sketch.</item>
+<item>Romeo and Juliet; first draft of it.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+THIRD EPOCH
+</p>
+
+<p>
+rises into the full, although youthful, Shakespeare;
+it was the negative period of his perfection.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='078'/><anchor id='Pg078'/>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Love's Labour's Lost.</item>
+<item>Twelfth Night.</item>
+<item>As You Like It.</item>
+<item>Midsummer Night's Dream.</item>
+<item>Richard II.</item>
+<item>Henry IV. and V.</item>
+<item>Henry VIII.; <hi rend='italic'>Gelegenheitsgedicht</hi>.</item>
+<item>Romeo and Juliet, as at present.</item>
+<item>Merchant of Venice.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+FOURTH EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Much Ado about Nothing.</item>
+<item>Merry Wives of Windsor; first edition.</item>
+<item>Henry VI.; <hi rend='italic'>rifacimento</hi>.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+FIFTH EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The period of beauty was now past; and that of
+δεινότης and grandeur succeeds.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Lear.</item>
+<item>Macbeth.</item>
+<item>Hamlet.</item>
+<item>Timon of Athens; an after vibration of
+Hamlet.</item>
+<item>Troilus and Cressida; <hi rend='italic'>Uebergang in die
+Ironie</hi>.</item>
+<item>The Roman Plays.</item>
+<item>King John, as at present.</item>
+<item>Merry Wives of Windsor</item>
+<item>Taming of the Shrew <hi rend='italic'>umgearbeitet.</hi></item>
+<item>Measure for Measure.</item>
+<item>Othello.</item>
+<item>Tempest.</item>
+<item>Winter's Tale.</item>
+<item>Cymbeline.</item>
+</list>
+
+<pb n='079'/><anchor id='Pg079'/>
+
+<p>
+CLASSIFICATION ATTEMPTED, 1810.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare's earliest dramas I take to be&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Love's Labour's Lost.</item>
+<item>All's Well that Ends Well.</item>
+<item>Comedy of Errors.</item>
+<item>Romeo and Juliet.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+In the second class I reckon&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Midsummer Night's Dream.</item>
+<item>As You Like It.</item>
+<item>Tempest.</item>
+<item>Twelfth Night.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+In the third, as indicating a greater energy&mdash;not
+merely of poetry, but of all the world of
+thought, yet still with some of the growing pains,
+and the awkwardness of growth&mdash;I place&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Troilus and Cressida.</item>
+<item>Cymbeline.</item>
+<item>Merchant of Venice.</item>
+<item>Much Ado about Nothing.</item>
+<item>Taming of the Shrew.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+In the fourth, I place the plays containing the
+greatest characters&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Macbeth.</item>
+<item>Lear.</item>
+<item>Hamlet.</item>
+<item>Othello.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+And lastly, the historic dramas, in order to be
+able to show my reasons for rejecting some whole
+plays, and very many scenes in others.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='080'/><anchor id='Pg080'/>
+
+<p>
+CLASSIFICATION ATTEMPTED, 1819.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I think Shakespeare's earliest dramatic attempt&mdash;perhaps
+even prior in conception to the <hi rend='italic'>Venus
+and Adonis</hi>, and planned before he left Stratford&mdash;was
+<hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's Lost</hi>. Shortly afterwards I
+suppose <hi rend='italic'>Pericles</hi> and certain
+scenes in <hi rend='italic'>Jeronymo</hi> to
+have been produced; and in the same epoch, I
+place the <hi rend='italic'>Winter's Tale</hi>
+and <hi rend='italic'>Cymbeline</hi>, differing
+from the <hi rend='italic'>Pericles</hi> by the
+entire <hi rend='italic'>rifacimento</hi> of it,
+when Shakespeare's celebrity as poet, and his interest,
+no less than his influence, as manager,
+enabled him to bring forward the laid-by labours
+of his youth. The example of <hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi>,
+which, as well as <hi rend='italic'>Jeronymo</hi>, was most popular in
+Shakespeare's first epoch, had led the young
+dramatist to the lawless mixture of dates and
+manners. In this same epoch I should place the
+<hi rend='italic'>Comedy of Errors</hi>, remarkable as being the only
+specimen of poetical farce in our language, that is,
+intentionally such; so that all the distinct kinds
+of drama, which might be educed <hi rend='italic'>a priori</hi>, have
+their representatives in Shakespeare's works. I
+say intentionally such; for many of Beaumont
+and Fletcher's plays, and the greater part of Ben
+Jonson's comedies, are farce plots. I add <hi rend='italic'>All's
+Well that Ends Well</hi>, originally intended as the
+counterpart of <hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's Lost</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Taming of the Shrew</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Midsummer Night's Dream</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Much Ado
+about Nothing</hi>, and <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+SECOND EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Richard II.</item>
+<item>King John.</item>
+<item>Henry VI.,&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>rifacimento</hi> only.</item>
+<item>Richard III.</item>
+</list>
+
+<pb n='081'/><anchor id='Pg081'/>
+
+<p>
+THIRD EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Henry IV.</item>
+<item>Henry V.</item>
+<item>Merry Wives of Windsor.</item>
+<item>Henry VIII.,&mdash;a sort of historical masque,
+or show play.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+FOURTH EPOCH
+</p>
+
+<p>
+gives all the graces and facilities of a genius in
+full possession and habitual exercise of power, and
+peculiarly of the feminine, the <emph>lady's</emph> character.
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Tempest.</item>
+<item>As You Like It</item>
+<item>Merchant of Venice.</item>
+<item>Twelfth Night.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+And, finally, at its very point of culmination&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Lear.</item>
+<item>Hamlet.</item>
+<item>Macbeth.</item>
+<item>Othello.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+LAST EPOCH.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+when the energies of intellect in the cycle of
+genius were, though in a rich and more potentiated
+form, becoming predominant over passion
+and creative self-manifestation&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<list type="simple">
+<item>Measure for Measure,</item>
+<item>Timon of Athens.</item>
+<item>Coriolanus.</item>
+<item>Julius Cæsar.</item>
+<item>Antony and Cleopatra.</item>
+<item>Troilus and Cressida.</item>
+</list>
+
+<p>
+Merciful, wonder-making Heaven! what a man
+was this Shakespeare! Myriad-minded, indeed,
+he was.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='083'/><anchor id='Pg083'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Notes On The <q>Tempest.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+There is a sort of improbability with which
+we are shocked in dramatic representation,
+not less than in a narrative of real life. Consequently,
+there must be rules respecting it; and as
+rules are nothing but means to an end previously
+ascertained&mdash;(inattention to which simple truth
+has been the occasion of all the pedantry of the
+French school),&mdash;we must first determine what the
+immediate end or object of the drama is. And
+here, as I have previously remarked, I find two
+extremes of critical decision;&mdash;the French, which
+evidently presupposes that a perfect delusion is to be
+aimed at,&mdash;an opinion which needs no fresh confutation;
+and the exact opposite to it, brought forward
+by Dr. Johnson, who supposes the auditors
+throughout in the full reflective knowledge of the
+contrary. In evincing the impossibility of delusion,
+he makes no sufficient allowance for an intermediate
+state, which I have before distinguished
+by the term illusion, and have attempted to illustrate
+its quality and character by reference to our
+mental state when dreaming. In both cases we
+simply do not judge the imagery to be unreal;
+there is a negative reality, and no more. Whatever,
+therefore, tends to prevent the mind from
+placing itself, or being placed, gradually in that
+state in which the images have such negative
+reality for the auditor, destroys this illusion, and
+is dramatically improbable.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='084'/><anchor id='Pg084'/>
+
+<p>
+Now, the production of this effect&mdash;a sense of
+improbability&mdash;will depend on the degree of excitement
+in which the mind is supposed to be.
+Many things would be intolerable in the first
+scene of a play, that would not at all interrupt our
+enjoyment in the height of the interest, when the
+narrow cockpit may be made to hold
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The vasty field of France, or we may cram</q></l>
+<l>Within its wooden O, the very casques,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">That did affright the air at Agincourt.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Again, on the other hand, many obvious improbabilities
+will be endured, as belonging to the
+groundwork of the story rather than to the drama
+itself, in the first scenes, which would disturb or
+disentrance us from all illusion in the acme of our
+excitement; as for instance, Lear's division of his
+kingdom, and the banishment of Cordelia.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But, although the other excellences of the drama
+besides this dramatic probability, as unity of interest,
+with distinctness and subordination of the
+characters, and appropriateness of style, are all, so
+far as they tend to increase the inward excitement,
+means towards accomplishing the chief end, that
+of producing and supporting this willing illusion,&mdash;yet
+they do not on that account cease to be ends
+themselves; and we must remember that, as such,
+they carry their own justification with them, as
+long as they do not contravene or interrupt the
+total illusion. It is not even always, or of necessity,
+an objection to them, that they prevent the
+illusion from rising to as great a height as it
+might otherwise have attained;&mdash;it is enough that
+they are simply compatible with as high a degree
+of it as is requisite for the purpose. Nay, upon
+<pb n='085'/><anchor id='Pg085'/>
+particular occasions, a palpable improbability may
+be hazarded by a great genius for the express purpose
+of keeping down the interest of a merely instrumental
+scene, which would otherwise make too
+great an impression for the harmony of the entire
+illusion. Had the panorama been invented in the
+time of Pope Leo X., Raffael would still, I doubt
+not, have smiled in contempt at the regret, that
+the broom twigs and scrubby bushes at the back of
+some of his grand pictures were not as probable
+trees as those in the exhibition.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The <hi rend='italic'>Tempest</hi> is a specimen of the purely romantic
+drama, in which the interest is not historical,
+or dependent upon fidelity of portraiture,
+or the natural connection of events, but is a birth
+of the imagination, and rests only upon the coaptation
+and union of the elements granted to, or
+assumed by, the poet. It is a species of drama
+which owes no allegiance to time or space, and in
+which, therefore, errors of chronology and geography&mdash;no
+mortal sins in any species&mdash;are venial
+faults, and count for nothing. It addresses itself
+entirely to the imaginative faculty; and although
+the illusion may be assisted by the effect on the
+senses of the complicated scenery and decorations
+of modern times, yet this sort of assistance is
+dangerous. For the principal and only genuine
+excitement ought to come from within&mdash;from the
+moved and sympathetic imagination; whereas,
+where so much is addressed to the mere external
+senses of seeing and bearing, the spiritual vision
+is apt to languish, and the attraction from without
+will withdraw the mind from the proper and only
+legitimate interest which is intended to spring
+from within.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='086'/><anchor id='Pg086'/>
+
+<p>
+The romance opens with a busy scene admirably
+appropriate to the kind of drama, and giving, as
+it were, the key-note to the whole harmony. It
+prepares and initiates the excitement required for
+the entire piece, and yet does not demand anything
+from the spectators, which their previous
+habits had not fitted them to understand. It is
+the bustle of a tempest, from which the real
+horrors are abstracted;&mdash;therefore it is poetical,
+though not in strictness natural&mdash;(the distinction
+to which I have so often alluded)&mdash;and is purposely
+restrained from concentering the interest
+on itself, but used merely as an induction or tuning
+for what is to follow.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the second scene, Prospero's speeches, till the
+entrance of Ariel, contain the finest example I remember
+of retrospective narration for the purpose
+of exciting immediate interest, and putting the
+audience in possession of all the information necessary
+for the understanding of the plot. Observe,
+too, the perfect probability of the moment chosen
+by Prospero (the very Shakespeare himself, as it
+were, of the tempest) to open out the truth to his
+daughter, his own romantic bearing, and how
+completely anything that might have been disagreeable
+to us in the magician, is reconciled and
+shaded in the humanity and natural feelings of the
+father. In the very first speech of Miranda, the
+simplicity and tenderness of her character are at
+once laid open;&mdash;it would have been lost in direct
+contact with the agitation of the first scene. The
+opinion once prevailed, but happily is now abandoned,
+that Fletcher alone wrote for women;&mdash;the
+truth is, that with very few, and those partial exceptions,
+the female characters in the plays of
+<pb n='087'/><anchor id='Pg087'/>
+Beaumont and Fletcher are, when of the light
+kind, not decent; when heroic, complete viragos.
+But in Shakespeare all the elements of womanhood
+are holy, and there is the sweet yet dignified
+feeling of all that <emph>continuates</emph> society, as sense of
+ancestry and of sex, with a purity unassailable by
+sophistry, because it rests not in the analytic processes,
+but in that sane equipoise of the faculties,
+during which the feelings are representative of all
+past experience,&mdash;not of the individual only, but of
+all those by whom she has been educated, and
+their predecessors, even up to the first mother that
+lived. Shakespeare saw that the want of prominence,
+which Pope notices for sarcasm, was the
+blessed beauty of the woman's character, and knew
+that it arose not from any deficiency, but from the
+more exquisite harmony of all the parts of the
+moral being constituing one living total of head
+and heart. He has drawn it, indeed, in all its distinctive
+energies of faith, patience, constancy, fortitude,&mdash;shown
+in all of them as following the
+heart, which gives its results by a nice tact and
+happy intuition, without the intervention of the
+discursive faculty, sees all things in and by the
+light of the affections, and errs, if it ever err, in
+the exaggerations of love alone. In all the Shakespearian
+women there is essentially the same
+foundation and principle; the distinct individuality
+and variety are merely the result of modification
+of circumstances, whether in Miranda the
+maiden, in Imogen the wife, or in Katherine the
+queen.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But to return. The appearance and characters
+of the super or ultra natural servants are finely
+contrasted. Ariel has in everything the airy tint
+<pb n='088'/><anchor id='Pg088'/>
+which gives the name; and it is worthy of remark
+that Miranda is never directly brought into comparison
+with Ariel, lest the natural and human of
+the one and the supernatural of the other should
+tend to neutralise each other; Caliban, on the
+other hand, is all earth, all condensed and gross in
+feelings and images; he has the dawnings of
+understanding without reason or the moral sense,
+and in him, as in some brute animals, this advance
+to the intellectual faculties, without the moral sense,
+is marked by the appearance of vice. For it is in
+the primacy of the moral being only that man is
+truly human; in his intellectual powers he is certainly
+approached by the brutes, and, man's whole
+system duly considered, those powers cannot be
+considered other than means to an end&mdash;that is,
+to morality.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this scene, as it proceeds, is displayed the
+impression made by Ferdinand and Miranda on
+each other; it is love at first sight;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 7">... <q rend="pre">At the first sight</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">They have chang'd eyes;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and it appears to me, that in all cases of real love,
+it is at one moment that it takes place. That moment
+may have been prepared by previous esteem,
+admiration, or even affection,&mdash;yet love seems to
+require a momentary act of volition, by which a
+tacit bond of devotion is imposed,&mdash;a bond not to
+be thereafter broken without violating what should
+be sacred in our nature. How finely is the true
+Shakespearian scene contrasted with Dryden's
+vulgar alteration of it, in which a mere ludicrous
+psychological experiment, as it were, is tried&mdash;displaying
+nothing but indelicacy without passion.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='089'/><anchor id='Pg089'/>
+
+<p>
+Prospero's interruption of the courtship has often
+seemed to me to have had no sufficient motive;
+still, his alleged reason&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 6">... <q rend="pre">Lest too light winning</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Make the prize light</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+is enough for the ethereal connections of the romantic
+imagination, although it would not be so
+for the historical. The whole courting scene, indeed,
+in the beginning of the third act, between
+the lovers, is a masterpiece; and the first dawn of
+disobedience in the mind of Miranda to the command
+of her father is very finely drawn, so as to
+seem the working of the Scriptural command&mdash;<q>Thou
+shalt leave father and mother,</q> &amp;c. Oh!
+with what exquisite purity this scene is conceived
+and executed! Shakespeare may sometimes be
+gross, but I boldly say that he is always moral and
+modest. Alas! in this our day, decency of
+manners is preserved at the expense of morality
+of heart, and delicacies for vice are allowed, whilst
+grossness against it is hypocritically, or at least
+morbidly, condemned.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this play are admirably sketched the vices
+generally accompanying a low degree of civilisation;
+and in the first scene of the second act
+Shakespeare has, as in many other places, shown
+the tendency in bad men to indulge in scorn and
+contemptuous expressions as a mode of getting rid
+of their own uneasy feelings of inferiority to the
+good, and also, by making the good ridiculous, of
+rendering the transition of others to wickedness
+easy. Shakespeare never puts habitual scorn into
+the mouths of other than bad men, as here in the
+instances of Antonio and Sebastian. The scene of
+<pb n='090'/><anchor id='Pg090'/>
+the intended assassination of Alonzo and Gonzalo
+is an exact counterpart of the scene between Macbeth
+and his lady, only pitched in a lower key
+throughout, as designed to be frustrated and concealed,
+and exhibiting the same profound management
+in the manner of familiarising a mind, not
+immediately recipient, to the suggestion of guilt,
+by associating the proposed crime with something
+ludicrous or out of place,&mdash;something not habitually
+matter of reverence. By this kind of sophistry
+the imagination and fancy are first bribed to
+contemplate the suggested act, and at length to
+become acquainted with it. Observe how the
+effect of this scene is heightened by contrast with
+another counterpart of it in low life,&mdash;that between
+the conspirators Stephano, Caliban, and
+Trinculo in the second scene of the third act, in
+which there are the same essential characteristics.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this play, and in this scene of it, are also
+shown the springs of the vulgar in politics,&mdash;of
+that kind of politics which is inwoven with human
+nature. In his treatment of this subject, wherever
+it occurs, Shakespeare is quite peculiar. In other
+writers we find the particular opinions of the individual;
+in Massinger it is rank republicanism; in
+Beaumont and Fletcher even <hi rend='italic'>jure divino</hi> principles
+are carried to excess;&mdash;but Shakespeare never
+promulgates any party tenets. He is always the
+philosopher and the moralist, but at the same time
+with a profound veneration for all the established
+institutions of society, and for those classes which
+form the permanent elements of the State,&mdash;especially
+never introducing a professional character,
+as such, otherwise than as respectable. If he must
+have any name, he should be styled a philosophical
+<pb n='091'/><anchor id='Pg091'/>
+aristocrat, delighting in those hereditary institutions
+which have a tendency to bind one age to
+another, and in that distinction of ranks, of which,
+although few may be in possession, all enjoy the
+advantages. Hence, again, you will observe the
+good nature with which he seems always to make
+sport with the passions and follies of a mob, as
+with an irrational animal. He is never angry
+with it, but hugely content with holding up its
+absurdities to its face; and sometimes you may
+trace a tone of almost affectionate superiority,
+something like that in which a father speaks of
+the rogueries of a child. See the good-humoured
+way in which he describes Stephano passing from
+the most licentious freedom to absolute despotism
+over Trinculo and Caliban. The truth is, Shakespeare's
+characters are all <hi rend='italic'>genera</hi> intensely individualised;
+the results of meditation, of which
+observation supplied the drapery and the colours
+necessary to combine them with each other. He
+had virtually surveyed all the great component
+powers and impulses of human nature,&mdash;had seen
+that their different combinations and subordinations
+were in fact the individualisers of men, and
+showed how their harmony was produced by reciprocal
+disproportions of excess or deficiency.
+The language in which these truths are expressed
+was not drawn from any set fashion, but from the
+profoundest depths of his moral being, and is
+therefore for all ages.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='093'/><anchor id='Pg093'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Love's Labour's Lost.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+The characters in this play are either impersonated
+out of Shakespeare's own multiformity
+by imaginative self-position, or out of such
+as a country town and schoolboy's observation
+might supply,&mdash;the curate, the schoolmaster, the
+Armado (who even in my time was not extinct in
+the cheaper inns of North Wales), and so on. The
+satire is chiefly on follies of words. Biron and
+Rosaline are evidently the pre-existent state of
+Benedict and Beatrice, and so, perhaps, is Boyet
+of Lafeu, and Costard of the tapster in <hi rend='italic'>Measure
+for Measure</hi>; and the frequency of the rhymes,
+the sweetness as well as the smoothness of the
+metre, and the number of acute and fancifully
+illustrated aphorisms, are all as they ought to be
+in a poet's youth. True genius begins by generalising
+and condensing; it ends in realising and expanding.
+It first collects the seeds.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Yet, if this juvenile drama had been the only
+one extant of our Shakespeare, and we possessed
+the tradition only of his riper works, or accounts
+of them in writers who had not even mentioned
+this play,&mdash;how many of Shakespeare's characteristic
+features might we not still have discovered in
+<hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's Lost</hi>, though as in a portrait taken
+of him in his boyhood.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I can never sufficiently admire the wonderful
+activity of thought throughout the whole of the
+first scene of the play, rendered natural, as it is,
+<pb n='094'/><anchor id='Pg094'/>
+by the choice of the characters, and the whimsical
+determination on which the drama is founded. A
+whimsical determination certainly;&mdash;yet not altogether
+so very improbable to those who are conversant
+in the history of the middle ages, with
+their Courts of Love, and all that lighter drapery
+of chivalry, which engaged even mighty kings
+with a sort of serio-comic interest, and may well
+be supposed to have occupied more completely the
+smaller princes, at a time when the noble's or
+prince's court contained the only theatre of the
+domain or principality. This sort of story, too,
+was admirably suited to Shakespeare's times, when
+the English court was still the foster-mother of the
+state and the muses; and when, in consequence,
+the courtiers, and men of rank and fashion, affected
+a display of wit, point, and sententious observation,
+that would be deemed intolerable at present,&mdash;but
+in which a hundred years of controversy, involving
+every great political, and every dear domestic,
+interest, had trained all but the lowest classes to
+participate. Add to this the very style of the sermons
+of the time, and the eagerness of the Protestants
+to distinguish themselves by long and
+frequent preaching, and it will be found that, from
+the reign of Henry VIII. to the abdication of
+James II. no country ever received such a national
+education as England.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Hence the comic matter chosen in the first instance
+is a ridiculous imitation or apery of this
+constant striving after logical precision and subtle
+opposition of thoughts, together with a making
+the most of every conception or image, by expressing
+it under the least expected property belonging
+to it, and this, again, rendered specially absurd by
+<pb n='095'/><anchor id='Pg095'/>
+being applied to the most current subjects and
+occurrences. The phrases and modes of combination
+in argument were caught by the most ignorant
+from the custom of the age, and their ridiculous
+misapplication of them is most amusingly exhibited
+in Costard; whilst examples suited only to the
+gravest propositions and impersonations, or apostrophes
+to abstract thoughts impersonated, which
+are in fact the natural language only of the most
+vehement agitations of the mind, are adopted by
+the coxcombry of Armado as mere artifices of
+ornament.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The same kind of intellectual action is exhibited
+in a more serious and elevated strain in many
+other parts of this play. Biron's speech at the
+end of the Fourth Act is an excellent specimen of
+it. It is logic clothed in rhetoric;&mdash;but observe
+how Shakespeare, in his two-fold being of poet
+and philosopher, avails himself of it to convey
+profound truths in the most lively images,&mdash;the
+whole remaining faithful to the character supposed
+to utter the lines, and the expressions themselves
+constituting a further development of that
+character:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Other slow arts entirely keep the brain:</q></l>
+<l>And therefore finding barren practisers,</l>
+<l>Scarce show a harvest of their heavy toil:</l>
+<l>But love, first learned in a lady's eyes,</l>
+<l>Lives not alone immured in the brain;</l>
+<l>But, with the motion of all elements,</l>
+<l>Courses as swift as thought in every power;</l>
+<l>And gives to every power a double power,</l>
+<l>Above their functions and their offices.</l>
+<l>It adds a precious seeing to the eye,</l>
+<l>A lover's eyes will gaze an eagle blind;</l>
+<l>A lover's ear will hear the lowest sound,</l>
+<l>When the suspicious head of theft is stopp'd:</l>
+<l>Love's feeling is more soft and sensible,</l>
+<l>Than are the tender horns of cockled snails;</l>
+<pb n='096'/><anchor id='Pg096'/>
+<l>Love's tongue proves dainty Bacchus gross in taste;</l>
+<l>For valour, is not love a Hercules,</l>
+<l>Still climbing trees in the Hesperides?</l>
+<l>Subtle as Sphinx; as sweet and musical,</l>
+<l>As bright Apollo's lute, strung with his hair;</l>
+<l>And when love speaks, the voice of all the gods</l>
+<l>Makes heaven drowsy with the harmony.</l>
+<l>Never durst poet touch a pen to write,</l>
+<l>Until his ink were tempered with love's sighs;</l>
+<l>Oh, then his lines would ravish savage ears,</l>
+<l>And plant in tyrants mild humility.</l>
+<l>From women's eyes this doctrine I derive:</l>
+<l>They sparkle still the right Promethean fire;</l>
+<l>They are the books, the arts, the academes,</l>
+<l>That show, contain, and nourish all the world;</l>
+<l>Else, none at all in aught proves excellent;</l>
+<l>Then fools you were these women to forswear;</l>
+<l>Or, keeping what is sworn, you will prove fools.</l>
+<l>For wisdom's sake, a word that all men love;</l>
+<l>Or for love's sake, a word that loves all men;</l>
+<l>Or for men's sake, the authors of these women;</l>
+<l>Or women's sake, by whom we men are men;</l>
+<l>Let us once lose our oaths, to find ourselves,</l>
+<l>Or else we lose ourselves to keep our oaths:</l>
+<l>It is religion to be thus forsworn:</l>
+<l>For charity itself fulfils the law:</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And who can sever love from charity?</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is quite a study;&mdash;sometimes you see this
+youthful god of poetry connecting disparate
+thoughts purely by means of resemblances in the
+words expressing them,&mdash;a thing in character in
+lighter comedy, especially of that kind in which
+Shakespeare delights, namely, the purposed display
+of wit, though sometimes too, disfiguring his
+graver scenes;&mdash;but more often you may see him
+doubling the natural connection or order of logical
+consequence in the thoughts by the introduction
+of an artificial and sought for resemblance in the
+words, as, for instance, in the third line of the
+play,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>And then grace us in the disgrace of death;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+this being a figure often having its force and propriety,
+as justified by the law of passion, which,
+<pb n='097'/><anchor id='Pg097'/>
+inducing in the mind an unusual activity, seeks
+for means to waste its superfluity,&mdash;when in the
+highest degree&mdash;in lyric repetitions and sublime
+tautology&mdash;<q>At her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay
+down; at her feet he bowed, he fell; where he
+bowed, there he fell down dead,</q>&mdash;and, in lower
+degrees, in making the words themselves the subjects
+and materials of that surplus action, and for
+the same cause that agitates our limbs, and forces
+our very gestures into a tempest in states of high
+excitement.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The mere style of narration in <hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's
+Lost</hi>, like that of Ægeon in the first scene of the
+<hi rend='italic'>Comedy of Errors</hi>, and of the Captain in the
+second scene of <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>, seems imitated with its
+defects and its beauties from Sir Philip Sidney;
+whose <hi rend='italic'>Arcadia</hi>, though not then published, was
+already well known in manuscript copies, and
+could hardly have escaped the notice and admiration
+of Shakespeare as the friend and client of the
+Earl of Southampton. The chief defect consists
+in the parentheses and parenthetic thoughts and
+descriptions, suited neither to the passion of the
+speaker, nor the purpose of the person to whom
+the information is to be given, but manifestly betraying
+the author himself,&mdash;not by way of continuous
+undersong, but&mdash;palpably, and so as to
+show themselves addressed to the general reader.
+However, it is not unimportant to notice how
+strong a presumption the diction and allusions of
+this play afford, that, though Shakespeare's acquirements
+in the dead languages might not be
+such as we suppose in a learned education, his
+habits had, nevertheless, been scholastic, and those
+of a student. For a young author's first work
+<pb n='098'/><anchor id='Pg098'/>
+almost always bespeaks his recent pursuits, and
+his first observations of life are either drawn from
+the immediate employments of his youth, and from
+the characters and images most deeply impressed
+on his mind in the situations in which those employments
+had placed him;&mdash;or else they are fixed
+on such objects and occurrences in the world, as
+are easily connected with, and seem to bear upon,
+his studies and the hitherto exclusive subjects of
+his meditation. Just as Ben Jonson, who applied
+himself to the drama after having served in
+Flanders, fills his earliest plays with true or pretended
+soldiers, the wrongs and neglects of the
+former, and the absurd boasts and knavery of
+their counterfeits. So Lessing's first comedies are
+placed in the universities, and consist of events
+and characters conceivable in an academic life.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I will only further remark the sweet and tempered
+gravity, with which Shakespeare in the end
+draws the only fitting moral which such a drama
+afforded. Here Rosaline rises up to the full
+height of Beatrice:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> Oft have I heard of you, my lord Biron,</q></l>
+<l>Before I saw you: and the world's large tongue</l>
+<l>Proclaims you for a man replete with mocks;</l>
+<l>Full of comparisons, and wounding flouts,</l>
+<l>Which you on all estates will execute</l>
+<l>That lie within the mercy of your wit:</l>
+<l>To weed this wormwood from your fruitful brain,</l>
+<l>And therewithal, to win me, if you please</l>
+<l>(Without the which I am not to be won),</l>
+<l>You shall this twelvemonth term from day to day</l>
+<l>Visit the speechless sick, and still converse</l>
+<l>With groaning wretches; and your talk shall be,</l>
+<l>With all the fierce endeavour of your wit,</l>
+<l>To enforce the pained impotent to smile.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Biron.</hi> To move wild laughter in the throat of death?</l>
+<l>It cannot be; it is impossible;</l>
+<l>Mirth cannot move a soul in agony.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> Why, that's the way to choke a gibing spirit,</l>
+<pb n='099'/><anchor id='Pg099'/>
+<l>Whose influence is begot of that loose grace,</l>
+<l>Which shallow laughing hearers give to fools;</l>
+<l>A jest's prosperity lies in the ear</l>
+<l>Of him that hears it, never in the tongue</l>
+<l>Of him that makes it: then, if sickly ears,</l>
+<l>Deaf'd with the clamours of their own dear groans,</l>
+<l>Will hear your idle scorns, continue then,</l>
+<l>And I will have you, and that fault withal:</l>
+<l>But, if they will not, throw away that spirit,</l>
+<l>And I shall find you empty of that fault,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Right joyful of your reformation.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 2. In Biron's speech to the Princess:
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10"><q rend="pre">And, therefore, like the eye,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Full of <emph>straying</emph> shapes, of habits, and of forms</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+either read <emph>stray</emph>, which I prefer; or throw <emph>full</emph>
+back to the preceding lines,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 8"><q rend="pre">Like the eye, full</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of straying shapes,</q> &amp;c,</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In the same scene:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Biron.</hi> And what to me, my love? and what to me?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> You must be purged too, your sins are rank;</l>
+<l>You are attaint with fault and perjury:</l>
+<l>Therefore, if you my favour mean to get,</l>
+<l>A twelvemonth shall you spend, and never rest,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But seek the weary beds of people sick.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There can be no doubt, indeed, about the propriety
+of expunging this speech of Rosaline's; it soils
+the very page that retains it. But I do not agree
+with Warburton and others in striking out the
+preceding line also. It is quite in Biron's character;
+and Rosaline, not answering it immediately,
+Dumain takes up the question for him,
+and, after he and Longaville are answered, Biron,
+with evident propriety, says:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><emph>Studies</emph> my mistress?</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='101'/><anchor id='Pg101'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Midsummer Night's Dream.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Her.</hi> O cross! too high to be enthrall'd to low&mdash;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Lys.</hi> Or else misgrafted in respect of years;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Her.</hi> O spite! too old to be engaged to young&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Lys.</hi> Or else it stood upon the choice of friends;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Her.</hi> O hell! to chuse love by another's eye!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There is no authority for any alteration;&mdash;but
+I never can help feeling how great an improvement
+it would be, if the two former of
+Hermia's exclamations were omitted;&mdash;the third
+and only appropriate one would then become a
+beauty, and most natural.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Helena's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I will go tell him of fair Hermia's flight,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I am convinced that Shakespeare availed himself
+of the title of this play in his own mind, and
+worked upon it as a dream throughout, but especially,
+and perhaps unpleasingly, in this broad
+determination of ungrateful treachery in Helena,
+so undisguisedly avowed to herself, and this, too,
+after the witty cool philosophising that precedes.
+The act itself is natural, and the resolve so to act
+is, I fear, likewise too true a picture of the lax
+hold which principles have on a woman's heart,
+when opposed to, or even separated from, passion
+and inclination. For women are less hypocrites
+to their own minds than men are, because in
+general they feel less proportionate abhorrence of
+moral evil in and for itself, and more of its outward
+<pb n='102'/><anchor id='Pg102'/>
+consequences, as detection and loss of character,
+than men,&mdash;their natures being almost
+wholly extroitive. Still, however just in itself,
+the representation of this is not poetical; we
+shrink from it, and cannot harmonise it with the
+ideal.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Theobald's edition&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><emph>Through</emph> bush, <emph>through</emph> briar&mdash;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Through</emph> flood, <emph>through fire</emph>&mdash;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What a noble pair of ears this worthy Theobald
+must have had! The eight amphimacers or
+cretics,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Ovĕr hīll, ōvĕr dāle,</q></l>
+<l>Thōrŏ' būsh, thōrŏ' brīar,</l>
+<l>Ovĕr pārk, ōvĕr pāle,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Thrōrŏ' flōōd, thōrŏ' fīre</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+have a delightful effect on the ear in their sweet
+transition to the trochaic,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I dŏ wāndĕr ēv'ry whērĕ</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Swīftĕr thān thĕ mōōnĕs sphērĕ,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The last words, as sustaining the rhyme, must be
+considered, as in fact they are, trochees in time.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It may be worth while to give some correct
+examples in English of the principle metrical
+feet:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>Pyrrhic or Dibrach, u u = <hi rend='italic'>bŏdy</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>spĭrĭt</hi>.</l>
+<l>Tribrach, u u u = <hi rend='italic'>nŏbŏdy</hi>, hastily pronounced.</l>
+<l>Iambus, u - = <hi rend='italic'>dĕlīght</hi>.</l>
+<l>Trochee, - u = <hi rend='italic'>līghtlȳ</hi>.</l>
+<l>Spondee, - - = <hi rend='italic'>Gōd spāke</hi>.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The paucity of spondees in single words in English,
+and indeed in the modern languages in general,
+<pb n='103'/><anchor id='Pg103'/>
+makes perhaps the greatest distinction, metrically
+considered, between them and the Greek and
+Latin.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>Dactyl, - u u = <hi rend='italic'>mērrĭlȳ</hi>.</l>
+<l>Anapæst, u u - = <hi rend='italic'>ă prŏpōs</hi>, or the first three
+syllables of <hi rend='italic'>cĕrĕmōny</hi>.</l>
+<l>Amphibrachys, u - u = <hi rend='italic'>dĕlīghtfŭl</hi>.</l>
+<l>Amphimacer, - u - = <hi rend='italic'>ōvĕr hīll</hi>.</l>
+<l>Antibacchius, u - = <hi rend='italic'>thĕ Lōrd Gōd</hi>.</l>
+<l>Bacchius, - - u = <hi rend='italic'>Hēlvēllȳn</hi>.</l>
+<l>Molossus, - - - = <hi rend='italic'>Jōhn Jāmes Jōnes</hi>.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+These simple feet may suffice for understanding
+the metres of Shakespeare, for the greater part at
+least;&mdash;but Milton cannot be made harmoniously
+intelligible without the composite feet, the Ionics,
+Pæons, and Epitrites.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Titania's speech (Theobald, adopting
+Warburton's reading):&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Which she, with pretty and with swimming gate</q></l>
+<l><emph>Follying</emph> (her womb then rich with my young squire)</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Would imitate,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Oh! oh! Heaven have mercy on poor Shakespeare,
+and also on Mr. Warburton's mind's eye!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 1. Theseus' speech (Theobald):&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And what poor [<emph>willing</emph>] duty cannot do,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Noble respect takes it in might, not merit.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+To my ears it would read far more Shakespearian
+thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And what poor duty cannot do, <emph>yet would</emph>,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Noble respect,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Puck.</hi> Now the hungry lion roars,</q></l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 2">And the wolf behowls the moon;</l>
+<l>Whilst the heavy ploughman snores</l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 2"><q rend="post">All with weary task foredone,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='104'/><anchor id='Pg104'/>
+
+<p>
+Very Anacreon in perfectness, proportion, grace,
+and spontaneity! So far it is Greek;&mdash;but then
+add, O! what wealth, what wild ranging, and yet
+what compression and condensation of, English
+fancy! In truth, there is nothing in Anacreon
+more perfect than these thirty lines, or half so
+rich and imaginative. They form a speckless
+diamond.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='105'/><anchor id='Pg105'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Comedy Of Errors.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+The myriad-minded man, our, and all men's
+Shakespeare, has in this piece presented us
+with a legitimate farce in exactest consonance with
+the philosophical principles and character of farce,
+as distinguished from comedy and from entertainments.
+A proper farce is mainly distinguished
+from comedy by the licence allowed, and even required,
+in the fable, in order to produce strange
+and laughable situations. The story need not be
+probable, it is enough that it is possible. A
+comedy would scarcely allow even the two Antipholuses;
+because, although there have been instances
+of almost indistinguishable likeness in two
+persons, yet these are mere individual accidents,
+<hi rend='italic'>casus ludentis naturæ</hi>,
+and the <hi rend='italic'>verum</hi> will not excuse
+the <hi rend='italic'>inverisimile</hi>. But farce dares add the two
+Dromios, and is justified in so doing by the laws
+of its end and constitution. In a word, farces
+commence in a postulate, which must be granted.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='107'/><anchor id='Pg107'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>As You Like It.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Oli.</hi> What, boy!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Orla.</hi> Come, come, elder brother, you are too young in this.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Oli.</hi> Wilt thou lay hands on me, villain?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There is a beauty here. The word <q>boy</q>
+naturally provokes and awakens in Orlando
+the sense of his manly powers; and with the
+retort of <q>elder brother,</q> he grasps him with
+firm hands, and makes him feel he is no boy.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<q><hi rend='italic'>Oli.</hi> Farewell, good Charles. Now will I stir this gamester:
+I hope, I shall see an end of him; for my soul, yet I know not why,
+hates nothing more than him. Yet he's gentle; never school'd, and
+yet learn'd; full of noble device; of all sorts enchantingly beloved!
+and, indeed, so much in the heart of the world, and especially of my
+own people, who best know him, that I am altogether misprised:
+but it shall not be so long; this wrestler shall clear all.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This has always appeared to me one of the most
+un-Shakespearian speeches in all the genuine
+works of our poet; yet I should be nothing surprised,
+and greatly pleased, to find it hereafter a
+fresh beauty, as has so often happened to me with
+other supposed defects of great men.&mdash;1810.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is too venturous to charge a passage in
+Shakespeare with want of truth to nature; and
+yet at first sight this speech of Oliver's expresses
+truths, which it seems almost impossible that any
+mind should so distinctly, so livelily, and so
+voluntarily, have presented to itself, in connection
+with feelings and intentions so malignant, and so
+contrary to those which the qualities expressed
+would naturally have called forth. But I dare
+<pb n='108'/><anchor id='Pg108'/>
+not say that this seeming unnaturalness is not in
+the nature of an abused wilfulness, when united
+with a strong intellect. In such characters there
+is sometimes a gloomy self-gratification in making
+the absoluteness of the will (<hi rend='italic'>sit pro ratione
+voluntas!</hi>) evident to themselves by setting the
+reason and the conscience in full array against it.&mdash;1818.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<q><hi rend='italic'>Celia.</hi> If your saw yourself with <emph>your</emph>
+eyes, or knew yourself
+with <emph>your</emph> judgment, the fear of your adventure would counsel you
+to a more equal enterprise.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Surely it should be <q><emph>our</emph> eyes</q> and <q><emph>our</emph>
+judgment.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Cel.</hi> But is all this for your father?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> No; some of it is for
+<emph>my child's father</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald restores this as the reading of the
+older editions. It may be so: but who can doubt
+that it is a mistake for <q>my father's child,</q> meaning
+herself? According to Theobald's note, a
+most indelicate anticipation is put into the mouth
+of Rosalind without reason;&mdash;and besides, what a
+strange thought, and how out of place and unintelligible!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Take thou no scorn</q></l>
+<l>To wear the horn, the lusty horn;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">It was a crest ere thou wast born.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I question whether there exists a parallel instance
+of a phrase, that like this of <q>horns</q> is
+universal in all languages, and yet for which no
+one has discovered even a plausible origin.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='109'/><anchor id='Pg109'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Twelfth Night.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Duke's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 6">... <q rend="pre">So full of shapes is fancy,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That it alone is high fantastical.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's alteration of <emph>is</emph> into <emph>in</emph> is
+needless. <q>Fancy</q> may very well be interpreted
+<q>exclusive affection,</q> or <q>passionate
+preference.</q> Thus, bird-fanciers; gentlemen of
+the fancy, that is, amateurs of boxing, &amp;c. The
+play of assimilation,&mdash;the meaning one sense
+chiefly, and yet keeping both senses in view, is
+perfectly Shakespearian.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 3. Sir Andrew's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+An explanatory note on <hi rend='italic'>Pigrogromitus</hi> would
+have been more acceptable than Theobald's grand
+discovery that <q>lemon</q> ought to be <q>leman.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Sir Toby's speech (Warburton's note on
+the Peripatetic philosophy):&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Shall we rouse the night-owl in a catch, that will draw three</q></l>
+<l><q>souls out of one weaver?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+O genuine, and inimitable (at least I hope so)
+Warburton! This note of thine, if but one in
+five millions, would be half a one too much.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Duke.</hi> My life upon't, young though thou art, thine eye</q></l>
+<l>Hath stay'd upon some favour that it loves;</l>
+<l>Hath it not, boy?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Vio.</hi> A little, by your favour.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Duke.</hi> What kind of woman is't?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+And yet Viola was to have been presented to
+Orsino as a eunuch!&mdash;Act i. sc. 2. Viola's speech.
+Either she forgot this, or else she had altered her
+plan.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='110'/><anchor id='Pg110'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Vio.</hi> A blank, my lord: she never told her love!&mdash;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">But let concealment,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+After the first line (of which the last five words
+should be spoken with, and drop down in, a deep
+sigh), the actress ought to make a pause; and then
+start afresh, from the activity of thought, born of
+suppressed feelings, and which thought had accumulated
+during the brief interval, as vital heat
+under the skin during a dip in cold water.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Fabian.</hi> Though our silence be drawn from us by <emph>cars</emph>, yet</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">peace.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Perhaps, <q>cables.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Clown.</hi> A sentence is but a <hi rend='italic'>cheveril</hi> glove to a good wit.</q></l>
+<l>(Theobald's note.)</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald's etymology of <q>cheveril</q> is, of course,
+quite right;&mdash;but he is mistaken in supposing that
+there were no such things as gloves of chicken-skin.
+They were at one time a main article in
+chirocosmetics.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 1. Clown's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">So that, <emph>conclusions to be as kisses</emph>, if your four negatives make</q></l>
+<l>your two affirmatives, why, then, the worse for my friends, and the</l>
+<l><q rend="post">better for my foes.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+(Warburton reads <q>conclusion to be asked, is.</q>)
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Surely Warburton could never have wooed by
+kisses and won, or he would not have flounder-flatted
+so just and humorous, nor less pleasing than
+humorous, an image into so profound a nihility.
+In the name of love and wonder, do not four kisses
+make a double affirmative? The humour lies in
+the whispered <q>No!</q> and the inviting <q>Don't!</q>
+with which the maiden's kisses are accompanied,
+and thence compared to negatives, which by repetition
+constitute an affirmative.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='111'/><anchor id='Pg111'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>All's Well That Ends Well.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Count.</hi> If the living be enemy to the grief, the excess makes</q></l>
+<l>it soon mortal.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Bert.</hi> <hi rend='italic'>Madam, I desire your holy wishes.</hi></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Laf.</hi> <hi rend='italic'>How understand we that?</hi></q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Bertram and Lafeu, I imagine, both speak
+together,&mdash;Lafeu referring to the Countess's
+rather obscure remark.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. (Warburton's note.)
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>King.</hi> ... let <emph>higher</emph> Italy</q></l>
+<l>(Those <emph>'bated</emph>, that inherit but the fall</l>
+<l>Of the last monarchy) see, that you come</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Not to woo honour, but to wed it.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It would be, I own, an audacious and unjustifiable
+change of the text; but yet, as a mere conjecture,
+I venture to suggest <q>bastards,</q> for <q>'bated.</q>
+As it stands, in spite of Warburton's note, I can
+make little or nothing of it. Why should the king
+except the then most illustrious states, which, as
+being republics, were the more truly inheritors of
+the Roman grandeur?&mdash;With my conjecture, the
+sense would be;&mdash;<q>let higher, or the more northern
+part of Italy&mdash;(unless <q>higher</q> be a corruption for
+<q>hir'd,</q>&mdash;the metre seeming to demand a monosyllable)
+(those bastards that inherit the infamy only
+of their fathers) see,</q> &amp;c. The following <q>woo</q>
+and <q>wed</q> are so far confirmative as they indicate
+Shakespeare's manner of connection by unmarked
+influences of association from some preceding metaphor.
+<pb n='112'/><anchor id='Pg112'/>
+This it is which makes his style so peculiarly
+vital and organic. Likewise <q>those girls of
+Italy</q> strengthen the guess. The absurdity of
+Warburton's gloss, which represents the king calling
+Italy superior, and then excepting the only
+part the lords were going to visit, must strike
+every one.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Laf.</hi> They say, miracles are past; and we have our philosophical</q></l>
+<l>persons to make modern and familiar, things supernatural</l>
+<l><q rend="post">and <emph>causeless</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare, inspired, as it might seem, with all
+knowledge, here uses the word <q>causeless</q> in its
+strict philosophical sense;&mdash;cause being truly predicable
+only of <hi rend='italic'>phenomena</hi>, that is, things natural,
+and not of <hi rend='italic'>noumena</hi>, or things supernatural.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Dia.</hi> The Count Rousillon:&mdash;know you such a one?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Hel.</hi> But by the ear that hears most nobly of him;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">His face I know not.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Shall we say here, that Shakespeare has unnecessarily
+made his loveliest character utter a lie?&mdash;Or
+shall we dare think that, where to deceive was
+necessary, he thought a pretended verbal verity a
+double crime, equally with the other a lie to the
+hearer, and at the same time an attempt to lie to
+one's own conscience?
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='113'/><anchor id='Pg113'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Merry Wives Of Windsor.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Shal.</hi> The luce is the fresh fish, the salt fish is
+an old coat.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I cannot understand this. Perhaps there is
+a corruption both of words and speakers.
+Shallow no sooner corrects one mistake of Sir
+Hugh's, namely, <q>louse</q> for <q>luce,</q> a pike, but
+the honest Welchman falls into another, namely,
+<q>cod</q> (<hi rend='italic'>baccalà</hi>).
+<hi rend='italic'>Cambrice</hi>&mdash;<q>cot</q> for coat.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Shal.</hi> The luce is the fresh fish&mdash;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Evans.</hi> The salt fish is an old cot.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>Luce is a fresh fish, and not a louse;</q> says Shallow.
+<q>Aye, aye,</q> quoth Sir Hugh; <q>the <emph>fresh</emph>
+fish is the luce; it is an old cod that is the salt
+fish.</q> At all events, as the text stands, there is
+no sense at all in the words.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Fal.</hi> Now, the report goes,
+she has all the rule of her husband's</q></l>
+<l>purse; He hath a legion of angels.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Pist.</hi> As many devils
+entertain; and <emph>To her, boy</emph>, say I.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Perhaps it is&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">As many devils enter (or enter'd) swine;
+and <emph>to her, boy</emph>,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">say I:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+a somewhat profane, but not un-Shakespearian, allusion
+to the <q>legion</q> in St. Luke's <q>gospel.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='115'/><anchor id='Pg115'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Measure For Measure.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This play, which is Shakespeare's throughout,
+is to me the most painful&mdash;say rather, the only
+painful&mdash;part of his genuine works. The comic
+and tragic parts equally border on the μισητὸν,&mdash;the
+one being disgusting, the other horrible; and
+the pardon and marriage of Angelo not merely
+baffles the strong indignant claim of justice&mdash;(for
+cruelty, with lust and damnable baseness, cannot
+be forgiven, because we cannot conceive them as
+being morally repented of); but it is likewise degrading
+to the character of woman. Beaumont
+and Fletcher, who can follow Shakespeare in his
+errors only, have presented a still worse, because
+more loathsome and contradictory, instance of the
+same kind in the <hi rend='italic'>Night-Walker</hi>, in the marriage
+of Alathe to Algripe. Of the counter-balancing
+beauties of <hi rend='italic'>Measure for Measure</hi>, I need say nothing;
+for I have already remarked that the play
+is Shakespeare's throughout.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Ay, but to die, and go we know not where,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<p>
+<q rend="pre">This natural fear of Claudio, from the antipathy we have to
+death, seems very little varied from that infamous wish of Mæcenas,
+recorded in the 101st epistle of Seneca:&mdash;</q>
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Debilem facito manu,</hi></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Debilem pede, coxa</hi></q>
+&amp;c.&mdash;Warburton's note.</l>
+</lg>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+I cannot but think this rather a heroic resolve,
+than an infamous wish. It appears to me to be
+the grandest symptom of an immortal spirit, when
+<pb n='116'/><anchor id='Pg116'/>
+even that bedimmed and overwhelmed spirit recked
+not of its own immortality, still to seek to be,&mdash;to
+be a mind, a will.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+As fame is to reputation, so heaven is to an
+estate, or immediate advantage. The difference
+is, that the self-love of the former cannot exist
+but by a complete suppression and habitual supplantation
+of immediate selfishness. In one point
+of view, the miser is more estimable than the
+spendthrift;&mdash;only that the miser's present feelings
+are as much of the present as the spendthrift's.
+But <hi rend='italic'>cæteris paribus</hi>, that is, upon the
+supposition that whatever is good or lovely in the
+one coexists equally in the other, then, doubtless,
+the master of the present is less a selfish being,
+an animal, than he who lives for the moment with
+no inheritance in the future. Whatever can degrade
+man, is supposed in the latter case; whatever
+can elevate him, in the former. And as to
+self;&mdash;strange and generous self! that can only
+be such a self by a complete divestment of all that
+men call self,&mdash;of all that can make it either
+practically to others, or consciously to the individual
+himself, different from the human race in
+its ideal. Such self is but a perpetual religion,
+an inalienable acknowledgment of God, the sole
+basis and ground of being. In this sense, how
+can I love God, and not love myself, as far as it
+is of God?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Pattern in himself to know,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Grace to stand, and virtue go.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Worse metre, indeed, but better English would
+be,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Grace to stand, virtue to go.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='117'/><anchor id='Pg117'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Cymbeline.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">You do not meet a man, but frowns: our bloods</q></l>
+<l>No more obey the heavens, than our courtiers'</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Still seem, as does the king's.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There can be little doubt of Mr. Tyrwhitt's
+emendations of <q>courtiers</q> and <q>king,</q> as
+to the sense;&mdash;only it is not impossible that
+Shakespeare's dramatic language may allow of the
+word <q>brows</q> or <q>faces</q> being understood after
+the word <q>courtiers',</q> which might then remain
+in the genitive case plural. But the nominative
+plural makes excellent sense, and is sufficiently
+elegant, and sounds to my ear Shakespearian.
+What, however, is meant by <q>our bloods no more
+obey the heavens?</q>&mdash;Dr. Johnson's assertion
+that <q>bloods</q> signify <q>countenances,</q> is, I think,
+mistaken both in the thought conveyed&mdash;(for it
+was never a popular belief that the stars governed
+men's countenances)&mdash;and in the usage, which
+requires an antithesis of the blood,&mdash;or the temperament
+of the four humours, choler, melancholy,
+phlegm, and the red globules, or the sanguine
+portion, which was supposed not to be in our own
+power, but to be dependent on the influences of
+the heavenly bodies,&mdash;and the countenances which
+are in our power really, though from flattery we
+bring them into a no less apparent dependence on
+<pb n='118'/><anchor id='Pg118'/>
+the sovereign, than the former are in actual
+dependence on the constellations.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I have sometimes thought that the word <q>courtiers</q>
+was a misprint for <q>countenances,</q> arising
+from an anticipation, by foreglance of the compositor's
+eye, of the word <q>courtier</q> a few lines
+below. The written <hi rend='italic'>r</hi> is easily and often confounded
+with, the written <hi rend='italic'>n</hi>. The compositor read
+the first syllable <hi rend='italic'>court</hi>, and&mdash;his eye at the same
+time catching the word <q>courtier</q> lower down&mdash;he
+completed the word without reconsulting the
+copy. It is not unlikely that Shakespeare intended
+first to express, generally, the same
+thought, which a little afterwards he repeats with
+a particular application to the persons meant;&mdash;a
+common usage of the pronominal <q>our,</q> where
+the speaker does not really mean to include himself;
+and the word <q>you</q> is an additional confirmation
+of the <q>our,</q> being used in this place for
+<q>men</q> generally and indefinitely,&mdash;just as <q>you
+do not meet</q> is the same as <q>one does not meet.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1 Imogen's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">My dearest husband,</q></l>
+<l>I something fear my father's wrath; but nothing</l>
+<l>(Always reserved my holy duty) what</l>
+<l><q rend="post">His rage can do on me;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Place the emphasis on <q>me</q>; for <q>rage</q> is a
+mere repetition of <q>wrath.</q>
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Cym.</hi> O disloyal thing;</q></l>
+<l>That should'st repair my youth; thou heapest</l>
+<l><q rend="post">A year's age on me!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+How is it that the commentators take no notice
+of the un-Shakespearian defect in the metre of the
+second line, and what in Shakespeare is the same,
+<pb n='119'/><anchor id='Pg119'/>
+in the harmony with the sense and feeling? Some
+word or words must have slipped out after
+<q>youth,</q>&mdash;possibly <q>and see</q>:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>That should'st repair my youth!&mdash;and see, thou heap'st,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Pisanio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">For so long</q></l>
+<l>As he could make me with <emph>this</emph> eye or ear</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Distinguish him from others,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+But <q><emph>this</emph> eye,</q> in spite of the supposition of its
+being used δεικτικῶς, is very awkward. I should
+think that either <q>or</q> or <q>the</q> was Shakespeare's
+word;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>As he could make me or with eye or ear.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6. Iachimo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 8">... <q rend="pre">Hath nature given them eyes</q></l>
+<l>To see this vaulted arch, and the rich crop</l>
+<l>Of sea and land, which can distinguish 'twixt</l>
+<l>The fiery orbs above, and the twinn'd stones</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Upon the number'd beach.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I would suggest <q>cope</q> for <q>crop.</q> As to
+<q>twinn'd stones</q>&mdash;may it not be a bold <hi rend='italic'>catachresis</hi>
+for muscles, cockles, and other empty shells with
+hinges, which are truly twinned? I would take
+Dr. Farmer's <q>umber'd,</q> which I had proposed
+before I ever heard of its having been already
+offered by him: but I do not adopt his interpretation
+of the word, which I think is not derived
+from <hi rend='italic'>umbra</hi>, a shade,
+but from <hi rend='italic'>umber</hi>, a dingy
+yellow-brown soil, which most commonly forms
+the mass of the sludge on the sea-shore, and on
+the banks of tide-rivers at low water. One other
+possible interpretation of this sentence has occurred
+to me, just barely worth mentioning;&mdash;that
+<pb n='120'/><anchor id='Pg120'/>
+the <q>twinn'd stones</q> are the <hi rend='italic'>augrim</hi> stones
+upon the number'd beech,&mdash;that is, the astronomical
+tables of beech-wood.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Sooth.</hi> When, as a lion's whelp,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It is not easy to conjecture why Shakespeare
+should have introduced this ludicrous scroll, which
+answers no one purpose, either propulsive, or explicatory,
+unless as a joke on etymology.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='121'/><anchor id='Pg121'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Titus Andronicus.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Theobald's note:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>I never heard it so much as intimated, that he (Shakespeare)
+had turned his genius to stage-writing, before he associated with
+the players, and became one of their body.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+That Shakespeare never <q>turned his genius to
+stage-writing,</q> as Theobald most <hi rend='italic'>Theobaldice</hi>
+phrases it, before he became an actor, is an assertion
+of about as much authority as the precious
+story that he left Stratford for deer-stealing, and
+that he lived by holding gentlemen's horses at the
+doors of the theatre, and other trash of that arch-gossip,
+old Aubrey. The metre is an argument
+against <hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi> being Shakespeare's,
+worth a score such chronological surmises. Yet
+I incline to think that both in this play and in
+<hi rend='italic'>Jeronymo</hi>, Shakespeare wrote some passages, and
+that they are the earliest of his compositions.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 2. I think it not improbable that
+the lines from&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I am not mad; I know thee well enough;</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+to
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post">So thou destroy Rapine, and Murder there</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+were written by Shakespeare in his earliest period.
+But instead of the text&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 4"><q rend="pre">Revenge, <emph>which makes
+the foul offenders quake.</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Tit. Art thou</emph> Revenge?
+and art thou sent to me?</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+the words in italics ought to be omitted.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='123'/><anchor id='Pg123'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Troilus And Cressida.</q></head>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Mr. Pope (after Dryden) informs us that the story of <hi rend='italic'>Troilus
+and Cressida</hi> was originally the work of one Lollius, a Lombard:
+but Dryden goes yet further; he declares it to have been written in
+Latin verse, and that Chaucer translated it. <emph>Lollius was a historiographer
+of Urbino in Italy.</emph></q>&mdash;Note in Stockdale's edition, 1807.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+<q>Lollius was a historiographer of Urbino in
+Italy.</q> So affirms the notary to whom the
+Sieur Stockdale committed the <hi rend='italic'>disfaciménto</hi> of
+Ayscough's excellent edition of Shakespeare.
+Pity that the researchful notary has not either
+told us in what century, and of what history, he
+was a writer, or been simply content to depose,
+that Lollius, if a writer of that name existed at
+all, was a somewhat somewhere. The notary
+speaks of the <hi rend='italic'>Troy Boke</hi> of Lydgate, printed in
+1513. I have never seen it; but I deeply regret
+that Chalmers did not substitute the whole of
+Lydgate's works from the MSS. extant, for the
+almost worthless Gower.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The <hi rend='italic'>Troilus and Cressida</hi> of Shakespeare can
+scarcely be classed with his dramas of Greek and
+Roman history; but it forms an intermediate link
+between the fictitious Greek and Roman histories,
+which we may call legendary dramas, and the
+proper ancient histories,&mdash;that is, between the
+<hi rend='italic'>Pericles</hi> or <hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi>,
+and the <hi rend='italic'>Coriolanus</hi>
+or <hi rend='italic'>Julius Cæsar</hi>.
+<hi rend='italic'>Cymbeline</hi> is a <hi rend='italic'>congener</hi> with
+<hi rend='italic'>Pericles</hi>, and distinguished from
+<hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> by not
+having any declared prominent object. But where
+<pb n='124'/><anchor id='Pg124'/>
+shall we class the <hi rend='italic'>Timon of Athens</hi>? Perhaps
+immediately below <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>. It is a <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> of the
+satirical drama; a <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> of domestic or ordinary
+life;&mdash;a local eddy of passion on the high road of
+society, while all around is the week-day goings
+on of wind and weather; a <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, therefore, without
+its soul-searching flashes, its ear-cleaving
+thunder-claps, its meteoric splendours,&mdash;without
+the contagion and the fearful sympathies of
+nature, the fates, the furies, the frenzied elements,
+dancing in and out, now breaking through and
+scattering,&mdash;now hand in hand with,&mdash;the fierce
+or fantastic group of human passions, crimes, and
+anguishes, reeling on the unsteady ground, in a
+wild harmony to the shock and the swell of an
+earthquake. But my present subject was <hi rend='italic'>Troilus
+and Cressida</hi>; and I suppose that, scarcely knowing
+what to say of it, I by a cunning of instinct
+ran off to subjects on which I should find it difficult not
+to say too much, though certain after all
+that I should still leave the better part unsaid,
+and the gleaning for others richer than my own
+harvest.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Indeed, there is no one of Shakespeare's plays
+harder to characterise. The name and the remembrances
+connected with it, prepare us for the representation
+of attachment no less faithful than
+fervent on the side of the youth, and of sudden
+and shameless inconstancy on the part of the lady.
+And this is, indeed, as the gold thread on which
+the scenes are strung, though often kept out of
+sight and out of mind by gems of greater value
+than itself. But as Shakespeare calls forth nothing
+from the mausoleum of history, or the catacombs
+of tradition, without giving, or eliciting, some
+<pb n='125'/><anchor id='Pg125'/>
+permanent and general interest, and brings forward
+no subject which he does not moralise or
+intellectualise,&mdash;so here he has drawn in Cressida
+the portrait of a vehement passion, that, having
+its true origin and proper cause in warmth of
+temperament, fastens on, rather than fixes to,
+some one object by liking and temporary preference.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">There's language in her eye, her cheek, her lip,</q></l>
+<l>Nay, her foot speaks; her wanton spirit looks out</l>
+<l><q rend="post">At every joint and motive of her body.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This Shakespeare has contrasted with the profound
+affection represented in Troilus, and alone
+worthy the name of love;&mdash;affection, passionate
+indeed,&mdash;swoln with the confluence of youthful
+instincts and youthful fancy, and growing in the
+radiance of hope newly risen, in short, enlarged
+by the collective sympathies of nature;&mdash;but still
+having a depth of calmer element in a will stronger
+than desire, more entire than choice, and which
+gives permanence to its own act by converting it
+into faith and duty. Hence, with excellent judgment,
+and with an excellence higher than mere
+judgment can give, at the close of the play, when
+Cressida has sunk into infamy below retrieval and
+beneath hope, the same will, which had been the
+substance and the basis of his love, while the restless
+pleasures and passionate longings, like sea-waves,
+had tossed but on its surface,&mdash;this same
+moral energy is represented as snatching him aloof
+from all neighbourhood with her dishonour, from
+all lingering fondness and languishing regrets,
+whilst it rushes with him into other and nobler
+duties, and deepens the channel, which his heroic
+brother's death had left empty for its collected
+<pb n='126'/><anchor id='Pg126'/>
+flood. Yet another secondary and subordinate
+purpose Shakespeare has inwoven with his delineation
+of these two characters,&mdash;that of opposing
+the inferior civilisation, but purer morals, of the
+Trojans to the refinements, deep policy, but duplicity
+and sensual corruptions of the Greeks.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To all this, however, so little comparative projection
+is given,&mdash;nay, the masterly group of
+Agamemnon, Nestor, and Ulysses, and, still more
+in advance, that of Achilles, Ajax, and Thersites,
+so manifestly occupying the fore-ground, that the
+subservience and vassalage of strength and animal
+courage to intellect and policy seems to be the
+lesson most often in our poet's view, and which he
+has taken little pains to connect with the former
+more interesting moral impersonated in the titular
+hero and heroine of the drama. But I am half
+inclined to believe, that Shakespeare's main object,
+or shall I rather say his ruling impulse, was to
+translate the poetic heroes of paganism into the
+not less rude, but more intellectually vigorous,
+and more <emph>featurely</emph>, warriors of Christian chivalry,&mdash;and
+to substantiate the distinct and graceful
+profiles or outlines of the Homeric epic into the
+flesh and blood of the romantic drama;&mdash;in short,
+to give a grand history-piece in the robust style
+of Albert Durer.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The character of Thersites, in particular, well
+deserves a more careful examination, as the Caliban
+of demagogic life;&mdash;the admirable portrait of intellectual
+power deserted by all grace, all moral
+principle, all not momentary impulse;&mdash;just wise
+enough to detect the weak head, and fool enough
+to provoke the armed fist of his betters;&mdash;one whom
+malcontent Achilles can inveigle from malcontent
+<pb n='127'/><anchor id='Pg127'/>
+Ajax, under the one condition, that he shall be
+called on to do nothing but abuse and slander, and
+that he shall be allowed to abuse as much and as
+purulently as he likes, that is, as he can;&mdash;in short,
+a mule,&mdash;quarrelsome by the original discord of his
+nature;&mdash;a slave by tenure of his own baseness,&mdash;made
+to bray and be brayed at, to despise and be
+despicable. <q>Aye, Sir, but say what you will, he
+is a very clever fellow, though the best friends will
+fall out. There was a time when Ajax thought he
+deserved to have a statue of gold erected to him
+and handsome Achilles, at the head of the Myrmidons,
+gave no little credit to his <hi rend='italic'>friend Thersites</hi>!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 5. Speech of Ulysses:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">O, these encounterers, so glib of tongue,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That give a <emph>coasting</emph> welcome ere it comes</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Should it be <q>accosting?</q> <q>Accost her, knight,
+accost!</q> in the <hi rend='italic'>Twelfth Night</hi>. Yet there sounds
+a something so Shakespearian in the phrase&mdash;<q>give
+a coasting welcome</q> (<q>coasting</q> being taken as
+the epithet and adjective of <q>welcome</q>), that had
+the following words been, <q>ere <emph>they land</emph>,</q> instead
+of <q>ere it comes,</q> I should have preferred the
+interpretation. The sense now is, <q>that give
+welcome to a salute ere it comes.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='129'/><anchor id='Pg129'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Coriolanus.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This play illustrates the wonderfully philosophic
+impartiality of Shakespeare's politics. His own
+country's history furnished him with no matter
+but what was too recent to be devoted to patriotism.
+Besides, he knew that the instruction of ancient
+history would seem more dispassionate. In <hi rend='italic'>Coriolanus</hi>
+and <hi rend='italic'>Julius Cæsar</hi>, you see Shakespeare's
+good-natured laugh at mobs. Compare this with
+Sir Thomas Brown's aristocracy of spirit.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Marcius' speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">He that depends</q></l>
+<l>Upon your favours, swims with fins of lead,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And hews down oaks with rushes. Hang ye! Trust ye?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I suspect that Shakespeare wrote it transposed!
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Trust ye? Hang ye!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 10. Speech of Aufidius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Mine emulation</q></l>
+<l>Hath not that honour in't, it had; for where</l>
+<l>I thought to crush him in an equal force,</l>
+<l>True sword to sword; I'll potch at him some way</l>
+<l>Or wrath, or craft may get him.&mdash;</l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... My valour (poison'd</l>
+<l>With only suffering stain by him) for him</l>
+<l>Shall fly out of itself: nor sleep, nor sanctuary,</l>
+<l>Being naked, sick, nor fane, nor capitol,</l>
+<l>The prayers of priests, nor times of sacrifices,</l>
+<l>Embankments all of fury, shall lift up</l>
+<l>Their rotten privilege and custom 'gainst</l>
+<l><q rend="post">My hate to Marcius.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I have such deep faith in Shakespeare's heart-lore,
+that I take for granted that this is in nature,
+<pb n='130'/><anchor id='Pg130'/>
+and not as a mere anomaly; although I cannot in
+myself discover any germ of possible feeling, which
+could wax and unfold itself into such sentiment as
+this. However, I perceive that in this speech is
+meant to be contained a prevention of shock at the
+after-change in Aufidius's character.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Speech of Menenius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>The most sovereign prescription in <hi rend='italic'>Galen</hi>,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Was it without, or in contempt of, historical information
+that Shakespeare made the contemporaries
+of Coriolanus quote Cato and Galen? I cannot
+decide to my own satisfaction.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Speech of Coriolanus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Why in this wolvish toge should I stand hero</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+That the gown of the candidate was of whitened
+wool, we know. Does <q>wolvish</q> or <q>woolvish</q>
+mean <q>made of wool?</q> If it means <q>wolfish,</q>
+what is the sense?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 7. Speech of Aufidius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>All places yield to him ere he sits down,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I have always thought this, in itself so beautiful
+speech, the least explicable from the mood and full
+intention of the speaker of any in the whole works
+of Shakespeare. I cherish the hope that I am
+mistaken, and that, becoming wiser, I shall discover
+some profound excellence in that, in which I
+now appear to detect an imperfection.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='131'/><anchor id='Pg131'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Julius Cæsar.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Mar.</hi> What meanest <emph>thou</emph>
+by that? Mend me, thou saucy</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">fellow!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The speeches of Flavius and Marullus are in
+blank verse. Wherever regular metre can be
+rendered truly imitative of character, passion, or
+personal rank, Shakespeare seldom, if ever, neglects
+it. Hence this line should be read:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>What mean'st by that? mend me, thou saucy fellow!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I say regular metre: for even the prose has in the
+highest and lowest dramatic personage, a Cobbler
+or a Hamlet, a rhythm so felicitous and so severally
+appropriate, as to be a virtual metre.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Bru.</hi> A soothsayer bids you beware the Ides of March.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+If my ear does not deceive me, the metre of this
+line was meant to express that sort of mild philosophic
+contempt, characterising Brutus even in his
+first casual speech. The line is a trimeter,&mdash;each
+<hi rend='italic'>dipodia</hi> containing two accented and two unaccented
+syllables, but variously arranged, as thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>u - - u | - u u - | u - u -</l>
+<l>A soothsayer | bids you beware | the Ides of March.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Brutus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Set honour in one eye, and death i' the other,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And I will look on <emph>both</emph> indifferently.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton would read <q>death</q> for <q>both;</q> but
+I prefer the old text. There are here three things,
+<pb n='132'/><anchor id='Pg132'/>
+the public good, the individual Brutus' honour, and
+his death. The latter two so balanced each other,
+that he could decide for the first by equipoise; nay&mdash;the
+thought growing&mdash;that honour had more
+weight than death. That Cassius understood it as
+Warburton, is the beauty of Cassius as contrasted
+with Brutus.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Cæsar's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">He loves no plays</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">As thou dost, Antony; he hears no music,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>This is not a trivial observation, nor does our poet mean barely
+by it, that Cassius was not a merry, sprightly man; but that he had
+not a due temperament of harmony in his disposition.</q>&mdash;Theobald's
+note.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+O Theobald! what a commentator wast thou,
+when thou would'st affect to understand Shakespeare,
+instead of contenting thyself with collating
+the text! The meaning here is too deep for a line
+ten-fold the length of thine to fathom.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Cæsar's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Be <emph>factious</emph> for redress of all these griefs;</q></l>
+<l>And I will set this foot of mine as far,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">As who goes farthest.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I understand it thus: <q>You have spoken as a
+conspirator; be so in <emph>fact</emph>, and I will join you.
+Act on your principles, and realize them in a fact.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Speech of Brutus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">It must be by his death; and, for my part,</q></l>
+<l>I know no personal cause to spurn at him,</l>
+<l>But for the general. He would be crown'd:</l>
+<l>How that might change his nature, there's the question.</l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... And, to speak truth of Cæsar,</l>
+<l>I have not known when his affections sway'd</l>
+<l>More than his reason.</l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... So Cæsar may;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Then, lest he may, prevent.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This speech is singular;&mdash;at least, I do not at
+<pb n='133'/><anchor id='Pg133'/>
+present see into Shakespeare's motive, his <emph>rationale</emph>,
+or in what point of view he meant Brutus' character
+to appear. For surely&mdash;(this, I mean, is what I say
+to myself, with my present <hi rend='italic'>quantum</hi> of insight,
+only modified by my experience in how many instances
+I have ripened into a perception of beauties,
+where I had before descried faults;) surely, nothing
+can seem more discordant with our historical preconceptions
+of Brutus, or more lowering to the
+intellect of the Stoico-Platonic tyrannicide, than
+the tenets here attributed to him&mdash;to him, the
+stern Roman republican; namely,&mdash;that he would
+have no objection to a king, or to Cæsar, a monarch
+in Rome, would Cæsar but be as good a monarch
+as he now seems disposed to be! How, too, could
+Brutus say that he found no personal cause&mdash;none
+in Cæsar's past conduct as a man? Had he not
+passed the Rubicon? Had he not entered Rome as
+a conqueror? Had he not placed his Gauls in the
+Senate?&mdash;Shakespeare, it may be said, has not
+brought these things forward&mdash;True;&mdash;and this is
+just the ground of my perplexity. What character
+did Shakespeare mean his Brutus to be?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Brutus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>For if thou <emph>path</emph>, thy native semblance on.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Surely, there need be no scruple in treating this
+<q>path</q> as a mere misprint or mis-script for <q>put.</q>
+In what place does Shakespeare&mdash;where does any
+other writer of the same age&mdash;use <q>path</q> as a
+verb for <q>walk?</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Cæsar's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>She dreamt to-night, she saw my <emph>statue</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+No doubt, it should be <hi rend='italic'>statua</hi>, as in the same age,
+they more often pronounced <q>heroes</q> as a trisyllable
+<pb n='134'/><anchor id='Pg134'/>
+than dissyllable. A modern tragic poet would
+have written,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Last night she dreamt that she my statue saw.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+But Shakespeare never avails himself of the supposed
+license of transposition, merely for the metre.
+There is always some logic either of thought or
+passion to justify it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1. Antony's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Pardon me, Julius&mdash;here wast thou bay'd, brave hart:</q></l>
+<l>Here didst thou fall; and here thy hunters stand</l>
+<l>Sign'd in thy spoil, and crimson'd in thy lethe.</l>
+<l><emph>O world! thou wast the forest to this hart,</emph></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>And this, indeed, O world! the heart of thee.</emph></q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I doubt the genuineness of the last two lines;&mdash;not
+because they are vile; but first, on account of
+the rhythm, which is not Shakespearian, but just
+the very tune of some old play, from which the
+actor might have interpolated them;&mdash;and secondly,
+because they interrupt, not only the sense and
+connection, but likewise the flow both of the passion,
+and (what is with me still more decisive) of
+the Shakespearian link of association. As with
+many another parenthesis or gloss slipt into the
+text, we have only to read the passage without it,
+to see that it never was in it. I venture to say
+there is no instance in Shakespeare fairly like this.
+Conceits he has; but they not only rise out of some
+word in the lines before, but also lead to the thought
+in the lines following. Here the conceit is a mere
+alien: Antony forgets an image, when he is even
+touching it, and then recollects it, when the thought
+last in his mind must have led him away from it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Speech of Brutus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">What, shall one of us,</q></l>
+<l>That struck the foremost man of all this world,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But for <emph>supporting robbers</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='135'/><anchor id='Pg135'/>
+
+<p>
+This seemingly strange assertion of Brutus is
+unhappily verified in the present day. What is
+an immense army, in which the lust of plunder has
+quenched all the duties of the citizen, other than a
+horde of robbers, or differenced only as fiends are
+from ordinarily reprobate men? Cæsar supported,
+and was supported by, such as these;&mdash;and even so
+Buonaparte in our days.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I know no part of Shakespeare that more impresses
+on me the belief of his genius being superhuman,
+than this scene between Brutus and Cassius.
+In the Gnostic heresy it might have been credited
+with less absurdity than most of their dogmas, that
+the Supreme had employed him to create, previously
+to his function of representing, characters.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='137'/><anchor id='Pg137'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Antony And Cleopatra.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare can be complimented only by
+comparison with himself: all other eulogies are
+either heterogeneous, as when they are in reference
+to Spenser or Milton; or they are flat truisms, as
+when he is gravely preferred to Corneille, Racine,
+or even his own immediate successors, Beaumont
+and Fletcher, Massinger and the rest. The highest
+praise, or rather form of praise, of this play, which
+I can offer in my own mind, is the doubt which the
+perusal always occasions in me, whether the <hi rend='italic'>Antony
+and Cleopatra</hi> is not, in all exhibitions of a giant
+power in its strength and vigour of maturity, a
+formidable rival of <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>, and
+<hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>. <hi rend='italic'>Feliciter audax</hi>
+is the motto for its style
+comparatively with that of Shakespeare's other
+works, even as it is the general motto of all his
+works compared with those of other poets. Be it
+remembered, too, that this happy valiancy of style
+is but the representative and result of all the
+material excellencies so expressed.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This play should be perused in mental contrast
+with <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>;&mdash;as the love of passion
+and appetite opposed to the love of affection and
+instinct. But the art displayed in the character of
+Cleopatra is profound; in this, especially, that the
+sense of criminality in her passion is lessened by
+our insight into its depth and energy, at the very
+moment that we cannot but perceive that the passion
+<pb n='138'/><anchor id='Pg138'/>
+itself springs out of the habitual craving of a
+licentious nature, and that it is supported and
+reinforced by voluntary stimulus and sought-for
+associations, instead of blossoming out of spontaneous
+emotion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Of all Shakespeare's historical plays, <hi rend='italic'>Antony and
+Cleopatra</hi> is by far the most wonderful. There is
+not one in which he has followed history so
+minutely, and yet there are few in which he impresses
+the notion of angelic strength so much;&mdash;perhaps
+none in which he impresses it more
+strongly. This is greatly owing to the manner in
+which the fiery force is sustained throughout, and
+to the numerous momentary flashes of nature counteracting
+the historic abstraction. As a wonderful
+specimen of the way in which Shakespeare lives up
+to the very end of this play, read the last part of
+the concluding scene. And if you would feel the
+judgment as well as the genius of Shakespeare in
+your heart's core, compare this astonishing drama
+with Dryden's <hi rend='italic'>All For Love</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Philo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">His captain's heart</q></l>
+<l>Which in the scuffles of great fights hath burst</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The buckles on his breast, <emph>reneges</emph> all temper.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It should be <q>reneagues,</q> or <q>reniegues,</q> as
+<q>fatigues,</q> &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Take but good note, and you shall see in him</q></l>
+<l>The triple pillar of the world transform'd</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Into a strumpet's <emph>fool</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's conjecture of <q>stool</q> is ingenious,
+and would be a probable reading, if the scene opening
+had discovered Antony with Cleopatra on his
+lap. But, represented as he is walking and jesting
+with her, <q>fool</q> must be the word. Warburton's
+<pb n='139'/><anchor id='Pg139'/>
+objection is shallow, and implies that he confounded
+the dramatic with the epic style. The <q>pillar</q>
+of a state is so common a metaphor as to have lost
+the image in the thing meant to be imaged.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Much is breeding;</q></l>
+<l>Which, like the courser's hair, hath yet but life,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And not a serpent's poison.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is so far true to appearance, that a horse-hair,
+<q>laid,</q> as Hollinshed says, <q>in a pail of
+water,</q> will become the supporter of seemingly one
+worm, though probably of an immense number of
+small slimy water-lice. The hair will twirl round
+a finger, and sensibly compress it. It is a common
+experiment with school boys in Cumberland and
+Westmoreland.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2. Speech of Enobarbus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Her gentlewomen, like the Nereides,</q></l>
+<l>So many <emph>mermaids</emph>, tended her i' th' eyes,</l>
+<l>And made their bends adornings. At the helm</l>
+<l><q rend="post">A seeming mermaid steers.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I have the greatest difficulty in believing that
+Shakespeare wrote the first <q>mermaids.</q> He
+never, I think, would have so weakened by useless
+anticipation the fine image immediately following.
+The epithet <q>seeming</q> becomes so extremely improper
+after the whole number had been positively
+called <q>so many mermaids.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='141'/><anchor id='Pg141'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Timon Of Athens.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Tim.</hi> The man is honest.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Old Ath.</hi> <emph>Therefore he will be</emph>, Timon.</l>
+<l><q rend="post">His honesty rewards him in itself.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's comment&mdash;<q>If the man be
+honest, for that reason he will be so in this,
+and not endeavour at the injustice of gaining my
+daughter without my consent</q>&mdash;is, like almost all
+his comments, ingenious in blunder; he can never
+see any other writer's thoughts for the mist-working
+swarm of his own. The meaning of the first line
+the poet himself explains, or rather unfolds, in the
+second. <q>The man is honest!</q>&mdash;<q>True;&mdash;and for
+that very cause, and with no additional or extrinsic
+motive, he will be so. No man can be justly called
+honest, who is not so for honesty's sake, itself including
+its own reward.</q> Note, that <q>honesty</q> in
+Shakespeare's age retained much of its old dignity,
+and that contradistinction of the <hi rend='italic'>honestum</hi> from the
+<hi rend='italic'>utile</hi>, in which its very essence and definition consist.
+If it be <hi rend='italic'>honestum</hi>, it cannot depend on the
+<hi rend='italic'>utile</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Apemantus, printed as prose in
+Theobald's edition:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>So, so! aches contract, and starve your supple joints!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I may remark here the fineness of Shakespeare's
+sense of musical period, which would almost by itself
+have suggested (if the hundred positive proofs
+had not been extant) that the word <q>aches</q> was
+<pb n='142'/><anchor id='Pg142'/>
+then <hi rend='italic'>ad libitum</hi>, a
+dissyllable&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>aitches</hi>. For read
+it <q>aches,</q> in this sentence, and I would challenge
+you to find any period in Shakespeare's writings
+with the same musical or, rather dissonant, notation.
+Try the one, and then the other, by your
+ear, reading the sentence aloud, first with the word
+as a dissyllable and then as a monosyllable, and you
+will feel what I mean.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Cupid's speech: Warburton's correction
+of&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>There taste, touch, all pleas'd from thy table rise</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+into
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Th' ear, taste, touch, smell,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is indeed an excellent emendation.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Senator's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Nor then silenc'd with</q></l>
+<l><q>Commend me to your master</q>&mdash;<emph>and the cap</emph></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Plays in the right hand, thus</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Either, methinks, <q>plays</q> should be <q>play'd,</q>
+or <q>and</q> should be changed to <q>while.</q> I
+can certainly understand it as a parenthesis, an
+interadditive of scorn; but it does not sound to my
+ear as in Shakespeare's manner.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Timon's speech (Theobald):&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And that unaptness made <emph>you</emph> minister,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Thus to excuse yourself.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read <emph>your</emph>;&mdash;at least I cannot otherwise understand
+the line. You made my chance indisposition
+and occasional inaptness your minister&mdash;that is, the
+ground on which you now excuse yourself. Or,
+perhaps, no correction is necessary, if we construe
+<q>made you</q> as <q>did you make;</q> <q>and that unaptness
+did you make help you thus to excuse
+yourself.</q> But the former seems more in Shakespeare's
+<pb n='143'/><anchor id='Pg143'/>
+manner, and is less liable to be misunderstood.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 3. Servant's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>How fairly this lord strives to appear foul!&mdash;takes virtuous
+copies to be wicked; <emph>like those that under hot, ardent zeal would set
+whole realms on fire. Of such a nature is his politic love</emph>.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+This latter clause I grievously suspect to have
+been an addition of the players, which had hit, and,
+being constantly applauded, procured a settled
+occupation in the prompter's copy. Not that
+Shakespeare does not elsewhere sneer at the Puritans;
+but here it is introduced so <hi rend='italic'>nolenter volenter</hi>
+(excuse the phrase) by the head and shoulders!&mdash;and
+is besides so much more likely to have been
+conceived in the age of Charles I.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Timon's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Raise me this beggar, and <emph>deny't</emph> that lord.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton reads <q>denude.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I cannot see the necessity of this alteration. The
+editors and commentators are, all of them, ready
+enough to cry out against Shakespeare's laxities
+and licenses of style, forgetting that he is not
+merely a poet, but a dramatic poet; that, when the
+head and the heart are swelling with fulness, a
+man does not ask himself whether he has grammatically
+arranged, but only whether (the context
+taken in) he has conveyed his meaning. <q>Deny</q>
+is here clearly equal to <q>withhold;</q> and the <q>it,</q>
+quite in the genius of vehement conversation, which
+a syntaxist explains by ellipses and <hi rend='italic'>subauditurs</hi> in
+a Greek or Latin classic, yet triumphs over as
+ignorances in a contemporary, refers to accidental
+and artificial rank or elevation, implied in the verb
+<q>raise.</q> Besides, does the word <q>denude</q> occur
+in any writer before, or of, Shakespeare's age?
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='145'/><anchor id='Pg145'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Romeo And Juliet.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+I have previously had occasion to speak at large
+on the subject of the three unities of time, place,
+and action, as applied to the drama in the abstract,
+and to the particular stage for which Shakespeare
+wrote, as far as he can be said to have written for
+any stage but that of the universal mind. I hope
+I have in some measure succeeded in demonstrating
+that the former two, instead of being rules,
+were mere inconveniences attached to the local
+peculiarities of the Athenian drama; that the last
+alone deserved the name of a principle, and that in
+the preservation of this unity Shakespeare stood
+pre-eminent. Yet, instead of unity of action, I
+should greatly prefer the more appropriate, though
+scholastic and uncouth, words homogeneity, proportionateness,
+and totality of interest,&mdash;expressions,
+which involve the distinction, or rather the
+essential difference, betwixt the shaping skill of
+mechanical talent, and the creative, productive,
+life-power of inspired genius. In the former each
+part is separately conceived, and then by a succeeding
+act put together;&mdash;not as watches are
+made for wholesale&mdash;(for there each part supposes
+a pre-conception of the whole in some mind),&mdash;but
+more like pictures on a motley screen. Whence
+arises the harmony that strikes us in the wildest
+natural landscapes,&mdash;in the relative shapes of rocks,
+<pb n='146'/><anchor id='Pg146'/>
+the harmony of colours in the heaths, ferns, and
+lichens, the leaves of the beech and the oak, the
+stems and rich brown branches of the birch and
+other mountain trees, varying from verging autumn
+to returning spring,&mdash;compared with the visual
+effect from the greater number of artificial plantations?&mdash;From
+this, that the natural landscape is
+effected, as it were, by a single energy modified <hi rend='italic'>ab
+intra</hi> in each component part. And as this is the
+particular excellence of the Shakespearian drama
+generally, so is it especially characteristic of the
+<hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The groundwork of the tale is altogether in
+family life, and the events of the play have their
+first origin in family feuds. Filmy as are the eyes
+of party-spirit, at once dim and truculent, still
+there is commonly some real or supposed object in
+view, or principle to be maintained; and though
+but the twisted wires on the plate of rosin in the
+preparation for electrical pictures, it is still a guide
+in some degree, an assimilation to an outline. But
+in family quarrels, which have proved scarcely less
+injurious to states, wilfulness, and precipitancy, and
+passion from mere habit and custom can alone be
+expected. With his accustomed judgment, Shakespeare
+has begun by placing before us a lively
+picture of all the impulses of the play; and, as
+nature ever presents two sides, one for Heraclitus,
+and one for Democritus, he has, by way of prelude,
+shown the laughable absurdity of the evil by the
+contagion of it reaching the servants who have so
+little to do with it, but who are under the necessity
+of letting the superfluity of sensoreal power fly
+off through the escape-valve of wit-combats, and of
+quarrelling with weapons of sharper edge, all in
+<pb n='147'/><anchor id='Pg147'/>
+humble imitation of their masters. Yet there is
+a sort of unhired fidelity, an <hi rend='italic'>ourishness</hi> about all
+this that makes it rest pleasant on one's feelings.
+All the first scene, down to the conclusion of the
+Prince's speech, is a motley dance of all ranks and
+ages to one tune, as if the horn of Huon had been
+playing behind the scenes.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Benvolio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Madam, an hour before the worshipp'd sun</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Peer'd forth the golden window of the east</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and, far more strikingly, the following speech of
+old Montague:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Many a morning hath he there been seen</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">With tears augmenting the fresh morning dew</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+prove that Shakespeare meant the <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>
+to approach to a poem, which, and indeed its early
+date, may be also inferred from the multitude of
+rhyming couplets throughout. And if we are right,
+from the internal evidence, in pronouncing this one
+of Shakespeare's early dramas, it affords a strong
+instance of the fineness of his insight into the nature
+of the passions, that Romeo is introduced already
+love-bewildered. The necessity of loving creates
+an object for itself in man and woman; and yet
+there is a difference in this respect between the
+sexes, though only to be known by a perception of
+it. It would have displeased us if Juliet had been
+represented as already in love, or as fancying herself
+so;&mdash;but no one, I believe, ever experiences
+any shock at Romeo's forgetting his Rosaline, who
+had been a mere name for the yearning of his
+youthful imagination, and rushing into his passion
+for Juliet. Rosaline was a mere creation of his
+fancy; and we should remark the boastful positiveness
+<pb n='148'/><anchor id='Pg148'/>
+of Romeo in a love of his own making, which
+is never shown where love is really near the heart.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">When the devout religion of mine eye</q></l>
+<l>Maintains such falsehood, then turn tears to fires!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l>One fairer than my love! the all-seeing sun</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Ne'er saw her match, since first the world begun.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The character of the Nurse is the nearest of any
+thing in Shakespeare to a direct borrowing from
+mere observation; and the reason is, that as in
+infancy and childhood the individual in nature is
+a representative of a class,&mdash;just as in describing
+one larch tree, you generalise a grove of them,&mdash;so
+it is nearly as much so in old age. The generalisation
+is done to the poet's hand. Here you have
+the garrulity of age strengthened by the feelings of
+a long-trusted servant, whose sympathy with the
+mother's affections gives her privileges and rank
+in the household; and observe the mode of connection
+by accidents of time and place, and the
+childlike fondness of repetition in a second childhood,
+and also that happy humble, ducking under,
+yet constant resurgence against, the check of her
+superiors!&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Yes, madam!&mdash;Yet I cannot choose but laugh,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In the fourth scene we have Mercutio introduced
+to us. O! how shall I describe that exquisite
+ebullience and overflow of youthful life, wafted on
+over the laughing waves of pleasure and prosperity,
+as a wanton beauty that distorts the face on which
+she knows her lover is gazing enraptured, and
+wrinkles her forehead in the triumph of its smoothness!
+Wit ever wakeful, fancy busy and procreative
+as an insect, courage, an easy mind that,
+without cares of its own, is at once disposed to
+<pb n='149'/><anchor id='Pg149'/>
+laugh away those of others, and yet to be interested
+in them,&mdash;these and all congenial qualities,
+melting into the common <hi rend='italic'>copula</hi> of them all, the
+man of rank and the gentleman, with all its excellencies
+and all its weaknesses, constitute the character
+of Mercutio!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Tyb.</hi> It fits when such a
+villain is a guest;</q></l>
+<l>I'll not endure him.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cap.</hi> He shall be endur'd.</l>
+<l>What, goodman boy!&mdash;I say, he shall:&mdash;Go to;&mdash;</l>
+<l>Am I the master here, or you?&mdash;Go to.</l>
+<l>You'll not endure him!&mdash;God shall mend my soul&mdash;</l>
+<l>You'll make a mutiny among my guests!</l>
+<l>You will set cock-a-hoop! you'll be the man!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Tyb.</hi> Why, uncle, 'tis a shame.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cap.</hi> Go to, go to,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">You are a saucy boy!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+How admirable is the old man's impetuosity at
+once contrasting, yet harmonised, with young
+Tybalt's quarrelsome violence! But it would be
+endless to repeat observations of this sort. Every
+leaf is different on an oak tree; but still we can
+only say&mdash;our tongues defrauding our eyes&mdash; <q>This
+is another oak-leaf!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2. The garden scene.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Take notice in this enchanting scene of the contrast
+of Romeo's love with his former fancy; and
+weigh the skill shown in justifying him from his
+inconstancy by making us feel the difference of his
+passion. Yet this, too, is a love in, although not
+merely of, the imagination.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Jul.</hi>
+Well, do not swear; although I joy in thee,</q></l>
+<l>I have no joy in this contract to-night:</l>
+<l><q rend="post">It is too rash, too unadvised, too sudden,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+With love, pure love, there is always an anxiety
+for the safety of the object, a disinterestedness, by
+<pb n='150'/><anchor id='Pg150'/>
+which it is distinguished from the counterfeits of
+its name. Compare this scene with Act iii. sc. 1
+of the <hi rend='italic'>Tempest</hi>. I do not know a more wonderful
+instance of Shakespeare's mastery in playing a
+distinctly rememberable variety on the same remembered
+air, than in the transporting love confessions
+of Romeo and Juliet and Ferdinand and
+Miranda. There seems more passion in the one,
+and more dignity in the other; yet you feel that
+the sweet girlish lingering and busy movement of
+Juliet, and the calmer and more maidenly fondness
+of Miranda, might easily pass into each other.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. The Friar's speech.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The reverend character of the Friar, like all
+Shakespeare's representations of the great professions,
+is very delightful and tranquillising, yet it
+is no digression, but immediately necessary to the
+carrying on of the plot.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q><hi rend='italic'>Rom.</hi> Good morrow to you both. What counterfeit did I give
+you?</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Compare again Romeo's half-exerted, and half
+real, ease of mind with his first manner when in
+love with Rosaline! His will had come to the
+clenching point.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Rom.</hi> Do thou but
+close our hands with holy words,</q></l>
+<l>Then love-devouring death do what he dare,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">It is enough I may but call her mine.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The precipitancy, which is the character of the
+play, is well marked in this short scene of waiting
+for Juliet's arrival.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q><hi rend='italic'>Mer.</hi> No, 'tis not so deep as a well, nor so wide as a church
+door; but 'tis enough: 'twill serve: ask for me to-morrow, and you
+shall find me a grave man,</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<pb n='151'/><anchor id='Pg151'/>
+
+<p>
+How fine an effect the wit and raillery habitual
+to Mercutio, even struggling with his pain, give
+to Romeo's following speech, and at the same time
+so completely justifying his passionate revenge
+on Tybalt!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Benvolio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">But that he tilts</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">With piercing steel at bold Mercutio's breast.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This small portion of untruth in Benvolio's
+narrative is finely conceived.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Juliet's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">For thou wilt lie upon the wings of night</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Whiter than new snow on a raven's back.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Indeed the whole of this speech is imagination
+strained to the highest; and observe the blessed
+effect on the purity of the mind. What would
+Dryden have made of it?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Nurse.</hi> Shame come to Romeo.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Jul.</hi> Blister'd be thy tongue</l>
+<l><q rend="post">For such a wish!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Note the Nurse's mistake of the mind's audible
+struggles with itself for its decision <hi rend='italic'>in toto</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Romeo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">'Tis torture, and not mercy: heaven's here,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Where Juliet lives,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+All deep passions are a sort of atheists, that
+believe no future.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Cap.</hi> Soft!
+take me with you, take me with you, wife&mdash;How!</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">will she none?</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+A noble scene! Don't I see it with my own
+eyes?&mdash;Yes! but not with Juliet's. And observe
+in Capulet's last speech in this scene his mistake,
+<pb n='152'/><anchor id='Pg152'/>
+as if love's causes were capable of being
+generalised.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Juliet's speech.:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">O, look! methinks I see my cousin's ghost</q></l>
+<l>Seeking out Romeo, that did spit his body</l>
+<l>Upon a rapier's point:&mdash;Stay, Tybalt, stay!&mdash;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Romeo, I come! this do I drink to thee.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare provides for the finest decencies.
+It would have been too bold a thing for a girl of
+fifteen;&mdash;but she swallows the draught in a fit of
+fright.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+As the audience know that Juliet is not dead,
+this scene is, perhaps, excusable. But it is a
+strong warning to minor dramatists not to introduce
+at one time many separate characters agitated
+by one and the same circumstance. It is difficult
+to understand what effect, whether that of pity or
+of laughter, Shakespeare meant to produce;&mdash;the
+occasion and the characteristic speeches are so
+little in harmony! For example, what the Nurse
+says is excellently suited to the Nurse's character,
+but grotesquely unsuited to the occasion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 1. Romeo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">O mischief! thou art swift</q></l>
+<l>To enter in the thoughts of desperate men!</l>
+<l><q rend="post">I do remember an apothecary,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This famous passage is so beautiful as to be self-justified;
+yet, in addition, what a fine preparation
+it is for the tomb scene!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Romeo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Good gentle youth, tempt not a desperate man,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Fly hence and leave me.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The gentleness of Romeo was shown before, as
+softened by love; and now it is doubled by love
+and sorrow and awe of the place where he is.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='153'/><anchor id='Pg153'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Romeo's speech:&mdash;--
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">How oft when men are at the point of death</q></l>
+<l>Have they been merry! which their keepers call</l>
+<l>A lightning before death. O, how may I</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Call this a lightning?&mdash;--O, my love, my wife!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Here, here, is the master example how beauty
+can at once increase and modify passion!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Last scene.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+How beautiful is the close! The spring and
+the winter meet;&mdash;winter assumes the character
+of spring, and spring the sadness of winter.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='155'/><anchor id='Pg155'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Shakespeare's English Historical Plays.</head>
+
+<p>
+The first form of poetry is the epic, the essence
+of which may be stated as the successive in
+events and characters. This must be distinguished
+from narration, in which there must always be a
+narrator, from whom the objects represented receive
+a colouring and a manner;&mdash;whereas in the
+epic, as in the so-called poems of Homer, the whole
+is completely objective, and the representation is a
+pure reflection. The next form into which poetry
+passed was the dramatic;&mdash;both forms having a
+common basis with a certain difference, and that
+difference not consisting in the dialogue alone.
+Both are founded on the relation of providence to
+the human will; and this relation is the universal
+element, expressed under different points of view
+according to the difference of religion, and the
+moral and intellectual cultivation of different
+nations. In the epic poem fate is represented as
+overruling the will, and making it instrumental
+to the accomplishment of its designs:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... Διὸς τελείετο βονλή</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In the drama, the will is exhibited as struggling
+with fate, a great and beautiful instance and illustration
+of which is the <hi rend='italic'>Prometheus</hi> of Æschylus;
+and the deepest effect is produced when the fate
+<pb n='156'/><anchor id='Pg156'/>
+is represented as a higher and intelligent will, and
+the opposition of the individual as springing from
+a defect.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In order that a drama may be properly historical,
+it is necessary that it should be the history
+of the people to whom it is addressed. In the
+composition, care must be taken that there appear
+no dramatic improbability, as the reality is taken
+for granted. It must, likewise, be poetical;&mdash;that
+only, I mean, must be taken which is the permanent
+in our nature, which is common, and
+therefore deeply interesting to all ages. The
+events themselves are immaterial, otherwise than
+as the clothing and manifestation of the spirit
+that is working within. In this mode, the unity
+resulting from succession is destroyed, but is supplied
+by a unity of a higher order, which connects
+the events by reference to the workers, gives a
+reason for them in the motives, and presents men
+in their causative character. It takes, therefore,
+that part of real history which is the least known,
+and infuses a principle of life and organisation
+into the naked facts, and makes them all the
+framework of an animated whole.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In my happier days, while I had yet hope and
+onward-looking thoughts, I planned an historical
+drama of King Stephen, in the manner of Shakespeare.
+Indeed, it would be desirable that some
+man of dramatic genius should dramatise all those
+omitted by Shakespeare, as far down as Henry
+VII. Perkin Warbeck would make a most interesting
+drama. A few scenes of Marlow's
+<hi rend='italic'>Edward II.</hi> might be preserved. After Henry
+VIII., the events are too well and distinctly
+known, to be, without plump inverisimilitude,
+<pb n='157'/><anchor id='Pg157'/>
+crowded together in one night's exhibition.
+Whereas, the history of our ancient kings&mdash;the
+events of the reigns, I mean&mdash;are like stars in the
+sky;&mdash;whatever the real interspaces may be, and
+however great, they seem close to each other.
+The stars&mdash;the events&mdash;strike us and remain in
+our eye, little modified by the difference of dates.
+An historic drama is, therefore, a collection of
+events borrowed from history, but connected together
+in respect of cause and time, poetically and
+by dramatic fiction. It would be a fine national
+custom to act such a series of dramatic histories in
+orderly succession, in the yearly Christmas holidays,
+and could not but tend to counteract that
+mock cosmopolitism, which under a positive term
+really implies nothing but a negation of, or indifference
+to, the particular love of our country.
+By its nationality must every nation retain its
+independence;&mdash;I mean a nationality <hi rend='italic'>quoad</hi> the
+nation. Better thus;&mdash;nationality in each individual,
+<hi rend='italic'>quoad</hi> his country, is equal to the sense of
+individuality <hi rend='italic'>quoad</hi> himself; but himself as sub-sensuous
+and central. Patriotism is equal to the
+sense of individuality reflected from every other
+individual. There may come a higher virtue in
+both&mdash;just cosmopolitism. But this latter is not
+possible but by antecedence of the former.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare has included the most important
+part of nine reigns in his historical dramas;&mdash;namely&mdash;King
+John, Richard II.&mdash;Henry IV.
+(two)&mdash;Henry V.&mdash;Henry VI. (three) including
+Edward V. and Henry VIII., in all ten plays.
+There remain, therefore, to be done, with the exception
+of a single scene or two that should be
+adopted from Marlow&mdash;eleven reigns&mdash;of which
+<pb n='158'/><anchor id='Pg158'/>
+the first two appear the only unpromising subjects;&mdash;and
+those two dramas must be formed wholly or
+mainly of invented private stories, which, however,
+could not have happened except in consequence
+of the events and measures of these reigns,
+and which should furnish opportunity both of exhibiting
+the manners and oppressions of the times,
+and of narrating dramatically the great events;&mdash;if
+possible, the death of the two sovereigns, at
+least of the latter, should be made to have some
+influence on the finale of the story. All the rest
+are glorious subjects; especially Henry I. (being
+the struggle between the men of arms and of
+letters, in the persons of Henry and Becket),
+Stephen, Richard I., Edward II., and Henry VII.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='159'/><anchor id='Pg159'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>King John.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Bast.</hi> James Gurney,
+wilt thou give us leave awhile?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Gur.</hi> Good leave, good Philip.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Bast.</hi> Philip?
+<emph>sparrow!</emph> James,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald adopts Warburton's conjecture
+of <q><emph>spare me</emph>.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+O true Warburton! and the <hi rend='italic'>sancta simplicitas</hi>
+of honest dull Theobald's faith in him! Nothing
+can be more lively or characteristic than <q>Philip?
+Sparrow!</q> Had Warburton read old Skelton's
+<hi rend='italic'>Philip Sparrow</hi>, an exquisite and original poem,
+and, no doubt, popular in Shakespeare's time, even
+Warburton would scarcely have made so deep a
+plunge into the <hi rend='italic'>bathetic</hi> as to have deathified
+<q><emph>sparrow</emph></q> into <q><emph>spare me</emph>!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 2. Speech of Faulconbridge:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Now, by my life, this day grows wondrous hot;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Some <emph>airy</emph> devil hovers in the sky,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald adopts Warburton's conjecture of <q>fiery.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I prefer the old text: the word <q>devil</q> implies
+<q>fiery.</q> You need only read the line, laying a
+full and strong emphasis on <q>devil,</q> to perceive
+the uselessness and tastelessness of Warburton's
+alteration.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='161'/><anchor id='Pg161'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Richard II.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+I have stated that the transitional link between
+the epic poem and the drama is the
+historic drama; that in the epic poem a pre-announced
+fate gradually adjusts and employs the
+will and the events as its instruments, whilst the
+drama, on the other hand, places fate and will in
+opposition to each other, and is then most perfect,
+when the victory of fate is obtained in consequence
+of imperfections in the opposing will, so as
+to leave a final impression that the fate itself is
+but a higher and a more intelligent will.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+From the length of the speeches, and the circumstance
+that, with one exception, the events are
+all historical, and presented in their results, not
+produced by acts seen by, or taking place before,
+the audience, this tragedy is ill suited to our present
+large theatres. But in itself, and for the
+closet, I feel no hesitation in placing it as the first
+and most admirable of all Shakespeare's purely
+historical plays. For the two parts of <hi rend='italic'>Henry IV.</hi>
+form a species of themselves, which may be named
+the mixed drama. The distinction does not depend
+on the mere quantity of historical events in the
+play compared with the fictions; for there is as
+much history in <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi> as
+in <hi rend='italic'>Richard</hi>, but in the
+relation of the history to the plot. In the purely
+historical plays, the history forms the plot; in the
+mixed, it directs it; in the rest, as <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Cymbeline</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, it subserves it. But,
+<pb n='162'/><anchor id='Pg162'/>
+however unsuited to the stage this drama may be,
+God forbid that even there it should fall dead on
+the hearts of jacobinised Englishmen! Then,
+indeed, we might say&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>præteriit gloria mundi!</hi>
+For the spirit of patriotic reminiscence is the all-permeating
+soul of this noble work. It is, perhaps,
+the most purely historical of Shakespeare's dramas.
+There are not in it, as in the others, characters
+introduced merely for the purpose of giving a
+greater individuality and realness, as in the comic
+parts of <hi rend='italic'>Henry IV.</hi>, by presenting as it were our
+very selves. Shakespeare avails himself of every
+opportunity to effect the great object of the historic
+drama,&mdash;that, namely, of familiarising the
+people to the great names of their country, and
+thereby of exciting a steady patriotism, a love of
+just liberty, and a respect for all those fundamental
+institutions of social life, which bind men
+together:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,</q></l>
+<l>This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,</l>
+<l>This other Eden, demi-paradise;</l>
+<l>This fortress, built by nature for herself,</l>
+<l>Against infection, and the hand of war;</l>
+<l>This happy breed of men, this little world;</l>
+<l>This precious stone set in the silver sea,</l>
+<l>Which serves it in the office of a wall,</l>
+<l>Or as a moat defensive to a home,</l>
+<l>Against the envy of less happier lands;</l>
+<l>This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,</l>
+<l>This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Fear'd by their breed, and famous by their birth,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Add the famous passage in <hi rend='italic'>King John</hi>:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">This England never did nor ever shall,</q></l>
+<l>Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,</l>
+<l>But when it first did help to wound itself.</l>
+<l>Now these her princes are come home again,</l>
+<l>Come the three corners of the world in arms,</l>
+<l>And we shall shock them: nought shall make us rue,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">If England to itself do rest but true.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='163'/><anchor id='Pg163'/>
+
+<p>
+And it certainly seems that Shakespeare's historic
+dramas produced a very deep effect on the minds
+of the English people, and in earlier times they
+were familiar even to the least informed of all
+ranks, according to the relation of Bishop Corbett.
+Marlborough, we know, was not ashamed to confess
+that his principal acquaintance with English
+history was derived from them; and I believe that
+a large part of the information as to our old names
+and achievements even now abroad is due, directly
+or indirectly, to Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Admirable is the judgment with which Shakespeare
+always in the first scenes prepares, yet how
+naturally, and with what concealment of art, for
+the catastrophe. Observe how he here presents
+the germ of all the after events in Richard's insincerity,
+partiality, arbitrariness, and favouritism,
+and in the proud, tempestuous, temperament of
+his barons. In the very beginning, also, is displayed
+that feature in Richard's character, which
+is never forgotten throughout the play&mdash;his attention
+to decorum, and high feeling of the kingly
+dignity. These anticipations show with what
+judgment Shakespeare wrote, and illustrate his
+care to connect the past and the future, and
+unify them with the present by forecast and
+reminiscence.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is interesting to a critical ear to compare the
+six opening lines of the play&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Old John of Gaunt, time-honour'd Lancaster,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Hast thou, according to thy oath and band,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+each closing at the tenth syllable, with the
+rhythmless metre of the verse in <hi rend='italic'>Henry VI.</hi> and
+<hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi>, in order that the difference,
+<pb n='164'/><anchor id='Pg164'/>
+indeed, the heterogeneity, of the two may be felt
+<hi rend='italic'>etiam in simillimis prima superficie</hi>. Here the
+weight of the single words supplies all the relief
+afforded by intercurrent verse, while the whole
+represents the mood. And compare the apparently
+defective metre of Bolingbroke's first line&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Many years of happy days befal</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+with Prospero's&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Twelve years since, Miranda! twelve years since.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The actor should supply the time by emphasis,
+and pause on the first syllable of each of these
+verses.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Bolingbroke's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">First (heaven be the record to my speech!),</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">In the devotion of a subject's love,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I remember in the Sophoclean drama no more
+striking example of the τὸ πρέπον καὶ σεμνὸν than
+this speech; and the rhymes in the last six lines
+well express the preconcertedness of Bolingbroke's
+scheme so beautifully contrasted with the vehemence
+and sincere irritation of Mowbray.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Bolingbroke's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Which blood, like sacrificing Abel's, cries,</q></l>
+<l>Even from the tongueless caverns of the earth,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To <emph>me</emph>, for justice and rough chastisement.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Note the δεινὸν of this <q>to me,</q> which is evidently
+felt by Richard:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>How high a pitch his resolution soars!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and the affected depreciation afterwards;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>As he is but my father's brother's son.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Mowbray's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">In haste whereof, most heartily I pray</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Your highness to assign our trial day.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='165'/><anchor id='Pg165'/>
+
+<p>
+The occasional interspersion of rhymes, and the
+more frequent winding up of a speech therewith&mdash;what
+purpose was this designed to answer? In the
+earnest drama, I mean. Deliberateness? An attempt,
+as in Mowbray, to collect himself and be
+cool at the close?&mdash;I can see that in the following
+speeches the rhyme answers the end of the Greek
+chorus, and distinguishes the general truths from
+the passions of the dialogue; but this does not
+exactly justify the practice, which is unfrequent in
+proportion to the excellence of Shakespeare's plays.
+One thing, however, is to be observed,&mdash;that the
+speakers are historical, known, and so far formal
+characters, and their reality is already a fact. This
+should be borne in mind. The whole of this scene
+of the quarrel between Mowbray and Bolingbroke
+seems introduced for the purpose of showing by
+anticipation the characters of Richard and Bolingbroke.
+In the latter there is observable a decorous
+and courtly checking of his anger in subservience
+to a predetermined plan, especially in his calm
+speech after receiving sentence of banishment compared
+with Mowbray's unaffected lamentation. In
+the one, all is ambitious hope of something yet to
+come; in the other it is desolation and a looking
+backward of the heart,
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Gaunt.</hi> God's is the quarrel;
+for God's substitute,</q></l>
+<l>His deputy anointed in his right,</l>
+<l>Hath caus'd his death: the which, if wrongfully,</l>
+<l>Let heaven revenge; for I may never lift</l>
+<l><q rend="post">An angry arm against his minister.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Without the hollow extravagance of Beaumont
+and Fletcher's ultra-royalism, how carefully does
+Shakespeare acknowledge and reverence the eternal
+distinction between the mere individual, and the
+<pb n='166'/><anchor id='Pg166'/>
+symbolic or representative, on which all genial law,
+no less than patriotism, depends. The whole of
+this second scene commences, and is anticipative
+of, the tone and character of the play at large.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. In none of Shakespeare's fictitious
+dramas, or in those founded on a history as unknown
+to his auditors generally as fiction, is this
+violent rupture of the succession of time found:&mdash;a
+proof, I think, that the pure historic drama, like
+<hi rend='italic'>Richard II.</hi> and
+<hi rend='italic'>King John</hi>, had its own laws.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Mowbray's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">A dearer <emph>merit</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Have I deserved at your highness' hand.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+O, the instinctive propriety of Shakespeare in
+the choice of words!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Richard's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Nor never by advised purpose meet,</q></l>
+<l>To plot, contrive, or complot any ill,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">'Gainst us, our state, our subjects, or our land.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Already the selfish weakness of Richard's character
+opens. Nothing will such minds so readily
+embrace, as indirect ways softened down to their
+<hi rend='italic'>quasi</hi>-consciences by policy, expedience, &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Mowbray's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q>All the world's my way.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>The world was all before him.</q>&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>Milt.</hi></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 2"><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Boling.</hi>
+How long a time lies in one little word!</q></l>
+<l>Four lagging winters, and four wanton springs,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">End in a word: such is the breath of kings.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Admirable anticipation!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. This is a striking conclusion of a first
+act,&mdash;letting the reader into the secret;&mdash;having
+before impressed us with the dignified and kingly
+manners of Richard, yet by well managed anticipations
+leading us on to the full gratification of
+<pb n='167'/><anchor id='Pg167'/>
+pleasure in our own penetration. In this scene a
+new light is thrown on Richard's character. Until
+now he has appeared in all the beauty of royalty;
+but here, as soon as he is left to himself, the inherent
+weakness of his character is immediately
+shown. It is a weakness, however, of a peculiar
+kind, not arising from want of personal courage,
+or any specific defect of faculty, but rather an intellectual
+feminineness, which feels a necessity of
+ever leaning on the breasts of others, and of reclining
+on those who are all the while known to be
+inferiors. To this must be attributed as its consequences
+all Richard's vices, his tendency to
+concealment, and his cunning, the whole operation
+of which is directed to the getting rid of present
+difficulties. Richard is not meant to be a debauchee;
+but we see in him that sophistry which is common
+to man, by which we can deceive our own hearts,
+and at one and the same time apologize for, and
+yet commit, the error. Shakespeare has represented
+this character in a very peculiar manner.
+He has not made him amiable with counterbalancing
+faults; but has openly and broadly drawn those
+faults without reserve, relying on Richard's disproportionate
+sufferings and gradually emergent
+good qualities for our sympathy; and this was
+possible, because his faults are not positive vices,
+but spring entirely from defect of character.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Can sick men play so nicely
+with their names?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Yes! on a death-bed there is a feeling which
+may make all things appear but as puns and equivocations.
+And a passion there is that carries off
+its own excess by plays on words as naturally, and,
+<pb n='168'/><anchor id='Pg168'/>
+therefore, as appropriately to drama, as by gesticulations,
+looks, or tones. This belongs to human
+nature as such, independently of associations and
+habits from any particular rank of life or mode of
+employment; and in this consists Shakespeare's
+vulgarisms, as in Macbeth's&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>The devil damn thee black, thou cream-fac'd loon!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is (to equivocate on Dante's words) in truth
+the <hi rend='italic'>nobile volgare eloquenza</hi>. Indeed it is profoundly
+true that there is a natural, an almost irresistible,
+tendency in the mind, when immersed in one
+strong feeling, to connect that feeling with every
+sight and object around it; especially if there be
+opposition, and the words addressed to it are in any
+way repugnant to the feeling itself, as here in the
+instance of Richard's unkind language:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Misery makes sport to mock itself.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+No doubt, something of Shakespeare's punning
+must be attributed to his age, in which direct and
+formal combats of wit were a favourite pastime of
+the courtly and accomplished. It was an age more
+favourable, upon the whole, to vigour of intellect
+than the present, in which a dread of being thought
+pedantic dispirits and flattens the energies of original
+minds. But independently of this, I have no
+hesitation in saying that a pun, if it be congruous
+with the feeling of the scene, is not only allowable
+in the dramatic dialogue, but oftentimes one of the
+most effectual intensives of passion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Right; you
+say true, as Hereford's love, so his;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">As theirs, so mine; and all be as it is.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The depth of this compared with the first scene:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>How high a pitch,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='169'/><anchor id='Pg169'/>
+
+<p>
+There is scarcely anything in Shakespeare in its
+degree, more admirably drawn than York's character;
+his religious loyalty struggling with a deep
+grief and indignation at the king's follies; his adherence
+to his word and faith, once given in spite
+of all, even the most natural, feelings. You see in
+him the weakness of old age, and the overwhelmingness
+of circumstances, for a time surmounting
+his sense of duty,&mdash;the junction of both exhibited
+in his boldness in words and feebleness in immediate
+act; and then again his effort to retrieve himself
+in abstract loyalty, even at the heavy price of
+the loss of his son. This species of accidental and
+adventitious weakness is brought into parallel with
+Richard's continually increasing energy of thought,
+and as constantly diminishing power of acting;&mdash;and
+thus it is Richard that breathes a harmony and
+a relation into all the characters of the play.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Queen.</hi> To please the king
+I did; to please myself</q></l>
+<l>I cannot do it; yet I know no cause</l>
+<l>Why I should welcome such a guest as grief,</l>
+<l>Save bidding farewell to so sweet a guest</l>
+<l>As my sweet Richard: yet again, methinks,</l>
+<l>Some unborn sorrow, ripe in sorrow's womb,</l>
+<l>Is coming toward me; and my inward soul</l>
+<l>With nothing trembles: at something it grieves,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">More than with parting from my lord the king.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It is clear that Shakespeare never meant to represent
+Richard as a vulgar debauchee, but a man
+with a wantonness of spirit in external show, a
+feminine <hi rend='italic'>friendism</hi>, an intensity of woman-like love
+of those immediately about him, and a mistaking of
+the delight of being loved by him for a love of him.
+And mark in this scene Shakespeare's gentleness in
+touching the tender superstitions, the <hi rend='italic'>terræ incognitæ</hi>
+of presentiments, in the human mind; and
+<pb n='170'/><anchor id='Pg170'/>
+how sharp a line of distinction he commonly draws
+between these obscure forecastings of general experience
+in each individual, and the vulgar errors of
+mere tradition. Indeed, it may be taken once for
+all as the truth, that Shakespeare, in the absolute
+universality of his genius, always reverences whatever
+arises out of our moral nature; he never profanes
+his muse with a contemptuous reasoning away
+of the genuine and general, however unaccountable,
+feelings of mankind.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The amiable part of Richard's character is
+brought full upon us by his queen's few words&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 6">... <q rend="pre">So sweet a guest</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">As my sweet Richard:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and Shakespeare has carefully shown in him an
+intense love of his country, well-knowing how that
+feeling would, in a pure historic drama, redeem him
+in the hearts of the audience. Yet even in this
+love there is something feminine and personal:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Dear earth, I do salute thee with my hand,&mdash;</q></l>
+<l>As a long parted mother with her child</l>
+<l>Plays fondly with her tears, and smiles in meeting;</l>
+<l>So weeping, smiling, greet I thee, my earth,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And do thee favour with my royal hands.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+With this is combined a constant overflow of emotions
+from a total incapability of controlling them,
+and thence a waste of that energy, which should
+have been reserved for actions, in the passion and
+effort of mere resolves and menaces. The consequence
+is moral exhaustion, and rapid alternations
+of unmanly despair and ungrounded hope,&mdash;every
+feeling being abandoned for its direct opposite upon
+the pressure of external accident. And yet when
+Richard's inward weakness appears to seek refuge
+in his despair, and his exhaustion counterfeits repose,
+the old habit of kingliness, the effect of
+<pb n='171'/><anchor id='Pg171'/>
+flatterers from his infancy, is ever and anon producing
+in him a sort of wordy courage which only
+serves to betray more clearly his internal impotence.
+The second and third scenes of the third
+act combine and illustrate all this:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Aumerle.</hi> He means,
+my lord, that we are too remiss;</q></l>
+<l>Whilst Bolingbroke, through our security,</l>
+<l>Grows strong and great, in substance, and in friends.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Discomfortable cousin! know'st thou not,</l>
+<l>That when the searching eye of heaven is hid</l>
+<l>Behind the globe, that lights the lower world,</l>
+<l>Then thieves and robbers range abroad unseen,</l>
+<l>In murders and in outrage, bloody here;</l>
+<l>But when, from under this terrestrial ball,</l>
+<l>He fires the proud tops of the eastern pines,</l>
+<l>And darts his light through every guilty hole,</l>
+<l>Then murders, treasons, and detested sins,</l>
+<l>The cloke of night being pluckt from off their backs,</l>
+<l>Stand bare and naked, trembling at themselves?</l>
+<l>So when this thief, this traitor, Bolingbroke, &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Aumerle.</hi> Where is the Duke my father with his power?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> No matter where; of comfort no man speak:</l>
+<l>Let's talk of graves, of worms, and epitaphs,</l>
+<l>Make dust our paper, and with rainy eyes</l>
+<l>Write sorrow on the bosom of the earth, &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Aumerle.</hi> My father hath a power, enquire of him;</l>
+<l>And learn to make a body of a limb.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Thou chid'st me well: proud Bolingbroke, I come</l>
+<l>To change blows with thee for our day of doom.</l>
+<l>This ague-fit of fear is over-blown;</l>
+<l>An easy task it is to win our own.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Scroop.</hi> Your uncle York hath join'd
+with Bolingbroke.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Thou hast said enough,</l>
+<l>Beshrew thee, cousin, which didst lead me forth</l>
+<l>Of that sweet way I was in to despair!</l>
+<l>What say you now? what comfort have we now?</l>
+<l>By heaven, I'll hate him everlastingly,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">That bids me be of comfort any more.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 3. Bolingbroke's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Noble lord,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Go to the rude ribs of that ancient castle,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='172'/><anchor id='Pg172'/>
+
+<p>
+Observe the fine struggle of a haughty sense of
+power and ambition in Bolingbroke with the necessity
+for dissimulation.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. See here the skill and judgment of
+our poet in giving reality and individual life, by the
+introduction of accidents in his historic plays, and
+thereby making them dramas, and not histories.
+How beautiful an islet of repose&mdash;a melancholy
+repose, indeed&mdash;is this scene with the Gardener and
+his Servant. And how truly affecting and realising
+is the incident of the very horse Barbary, in the
+scene with the Groom in the last act!&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Groom.</hi> I was a poor groom of
+thy stable, King,</q></l>
+<l>When thou wert King; who, travelling towards York,</l>
+<l>With much ado, at length have gotten leave</l>
+<l>To look upon my sometimes master's face.</l>
+<l>O, how it yearn'd my heart, when I beheld,</l>
+<l>In London streets, that coronation day,</l>
+<l>When Bolingbroke rode on roan Barbary!</l>
+<l>That horse, that thou so often hast bestrid;</l>
+<l>That horse, that I so carefully have dress'd!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>K. Rich.</hi> Rode he on Barbary?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Bolingbroke's character, in general, is an instance
+how Shakespeare makes one play introductory to
+another; for it is evidently a preparation for Henry
+IV., as Gloster in the third part of <hi rend='italic'>Henry VI.</hi> is
+for Richard III.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I would once more remark upon the exalted idea
+of the only true loyalty developed in this noble and
+impressive play. We have neither the rants of
+Beaumont and Fletcher, nor the sneers of Massinger;&mdash;the
+vast importance of the personal character
+of the sovereign is distinctly enounced, whilst, at
+the same time, the genuine sanctity which surrounds
+him is attributed to, and grounded on, the position
+in which he stands as the convergence and exponent
+of the life and power of the state.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='173'/><anchor id='Pg173'/>
+
+<p>
+The great end of the body politic appears to be
+to humanise, and assist in the progressiveness of,
+the animal man;&mdash;but the problem is so complicated
+with contingencies as to render it nearly impossible
+to lay down rules for the formation of a state. And
+should we be able to form a system of government,
+which should so balance its different powers as to
+form a check upon each, and so continually remedy
+and correct itself, it would, nevertheless, defeat its
+own aim;&mdash;for man is destined to be guided by
+higher principles, by universal views, which can
+never be fulfilled in this state of existence,&mdash;by a
+spirit of progressiveness which can never be accomplished,
+for then it would cease to be. Plato's
+Republic is like Bunyan's Town of Man-Soul,&mdash;a
+description of an individual, all of whose faculties
+are in their proper subordination and inter-dependence;
+and this it is assumed may be the prototype
+of the state as one great individual. But there is
+this sophism in it, that it is forgotten that the
+human faculties, indeed, are parts and not separate
+things; but that you could never get chiefs who
+were wholly reason, ministers who were wholly
+understanding, soldiers all wrath, labourers all concupiscence,
+and so on through the rest. Each of
+these partakes of, and interferes with, all the
+others.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='175'/><anchor id='Pg175'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Henry IV.&mdash;Part I.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. King Henry's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">No more the thirsty entrance of this soil</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Shall daub her lips with her own children's blood.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+A most obscure passage: but I think Theobald's
+interpretation right, namely, that
+<q>thirsty entrance</q> means the dry penetrability, or
+bibulous drought, of the soil. The obscurity of
+this passage is of the Shakespearian sort.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. In this, the first introduction of Falstaff,
+observe the consciousness and the intentionality
+of his wit, so that when it does not flow of its
+own accord, its absence is felt, and an effort visibly
+made to recall it. Note also throughout how Falstaff's
+pride is gratified in the power of influencing
+a prince of the blood, the heir apparent, by means
+of it. Hence his dislike to Prince John of Lancaster,
+and his mortification when he finds his wit
+fail on him:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>P. John.</hi> Fare you well,
+Falstaff: I, in my condition,</q></l>
+<l>Shall better speak of you than you deserve.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Fal.</hi> I would you had but the wit; 'twere better than your</l>
+<l>dukedom.&mdash;Good faith, this same young sober-blooded boy doth</l>
+<l><q rend="post">not love me;&mdash;nor a man cannot make him laugh.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Second Carrier's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q>breeds fleas like a <emph>loach</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Perhaps it is a misprint, or a provincial pronunciation,
+for <q>leach,</q> that is, blood-suckers. Had it
+<pb n='176'/><anchor id='Pg176'/>
+been gnats, instead of fleas, there might have been
+some sense, though small probability, in Warburton's
+suggestion of the Scottish <q>loch.</q> Possibly
+<q>loach,</q> or <q>lutch,</q> may be some lost word for
+dovecote, or poultry-lodge, notorious for breeding
+fleas. In Stevens's or my reading, it should properly
+be <q>loaches,</q> or <q>leeches,</q> in the plural; except
+that I think I have heard anglers speak of
+trouts like <hi rend='italic'>a</hi> salmon.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Glend.</hi> <emph>Nay</emph>, if you melt,
+then will she run mad.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This <q>nay</q> so to be dwelt on in speaking, as to
+be equivalent to a dissyllable - u, is characteristic
+of the solemn Glendower; but the imperfect line
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><emph>She bids you</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Upon the wanton rushes lay you down,</q> &amp;c.,</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+is one of those fine hair-strokes of exquisite judgment
+peculiar to Shakespeare;&mdash;thus detaching the
+Lady's speech, and giving it the individuality and
+entireness of a little poem, while he draws attention
+to it.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='177'/><anchor id='Pg177'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Henry IV.&mdash;Part II.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>P. Hen.</hi> Sup any women with him?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Page.</hi> None, my lord, but old mistress Quickly, and mistress</l>
+<l>Doll Tear-sheet.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>P. Hen.</hi> This Doll Tear-sheet should
+be some road.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I am sometimes disposed to think that this respectable
+young lady's name is a very old corruption
+for Tear-street&mdash;street-walker, <hi rend='italic'>terere stratam</hi>
+(<hi rend='italic'>viam</hi>). Does not the Prince's question rather
+show this?&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>This Doll Tear-street should be some road?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1. King Henry's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 8">... <q rend="pre">Then, <emph>happy low,
+lie down</emph>;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I know no argument by which to persuade any
+one to be of my opinion, or rather of my feeling;
+but yet I cannot help feeling that <q>Happy low-lie-down!</q>
+is either a proverbial expression, or the
+burthen of some old song, and means, <q>Happy the
+man, who lays himself down on his straw bed or
+chaff pallet on the ground or floor!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Shallow's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><emph>Rah, tah, tah</emph>, would 'a say; <emph>bounce</emph>,
+would 'a say,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+That Beaumont and Fletcher have more than
+once been guilty of sneering at their great master,
+cannot, I fear, be denied; but the passage quoted
+by Theobald from the <hi rend='italic'>Knight of the Burning Pestle</hi>
+is an imitation. If it be chargeable with any fault,
+it is with plagiarism, not with sarcasm.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='179'/><anchor id='Pg179'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Henry V.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 2. Westmoreland's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">They know your <emph>grace</emph> hath cause,
+and means, and might;</q></l>
+<l>So hath your <emph>highness</emph>; never King of England</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Had nobles richer,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Does <q>grace</q> mean the king's own peculiar
+domains and legal revenue, and <q>highness</q>
+his feudal rights in the military service of his
+nobles?&mdash;I have sometimes thought it possible
+that the words <q>grace</q> and <q>cause</q> may have been
+transposed in the copying or printing;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>They know your cause hath grace,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What Theobald meant, I cannot guess. To me
+his pointing makes the passage still more obscure.
+Perhaps the lines ought to be recited dramatically
+thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">They know your Grace hath cause, and means, and might:&mdash;</q></l>
+<l>So <emph>hath</emph> your Highness&mdash;never King of England</l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Had</emph> nobles richer,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+He breaks off from the grammar and natural
+order from earnestness, and in order to give the
+meaning more passionately.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Exeter's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Yet that is but a <emph>crush'd</emph> necessity.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Perhaps it may be <q>crash</q> for <q>crass</q> from
+<hi rend='italic'>crassus</hi>, clumsy; or it may be <q>curt,</q> defective,
+imperfect: anything would be better than Warburton's
+<q>'scus'd,</q> which honest Theobald, of course,
+adopts. By the by, it seems clear to me that this
+<pb n='180'/><anchor id='Pg180'/>
+speech of Exeter's properly belongs to Canterbury,
+and was altered by the actors for convenience.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. King Henry's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">We would not <emph>die</emph> in that man's company</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That fears his fellowship to die with us.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Should it not be <q>live</q> in the first line?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Const.</hi> <emph>O diable!</emph></q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Orl.</hi> <hi rend='italic'>O seigneur! le jour
+est perdu, tout est perdu!</hi></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Dan.</hi> <hi rend='italic'>Mort de ma vie!</hi>
+all is confounded, all!</l>
+<l>Reproach and everlasting shame</l>
+<l>Sit mocking in our plumes!&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>O meschante fortune!</hi></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Do not run away!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Ludicrous as these introductory scraps of French
+appear, so instantly followed by good, nervous
+mother-English, yet they are judicious, and produce
+the impression which Shakespeare intended,&mdash;a
+sudden feeling struck at once on the ears, as well
+as the eyes, of the audience, that <q>here come the
+French, the baffled French braggards!</q>&mdash;And this
+will appear still more judicious, when we reflect on
+the scanty apparatus of distinguishing dresses in
+Shakespeare's tyring-room.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='181'/><anchor id='Pg181'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Henry VI.&mdash;Part I.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Bedford's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Hung be the heavens with black, yield day to night!</q></l>
+<l>Comets, importing change of times and states,</l>
+<l>Brandish your crystal tresses in the sky;</l>
+<l>And with them scourge the bad revolting stars</l>
+<l>That have consented unto Henry's death!</l>
+<l>Henry the fifth, too famous to live long!</l>
+<l><q rend="post">England ne'er lost a king of so much worth.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read aloud any two or three passages in blank
+verse even from Shakespeare's earliest dramas,
+as <hi rend='italic'>Love's Labour's Lost</hi>, or
+<hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>; and
+then read in the same way this speech, with especial
+attention to the metre; and if you do not feel the
+impossibility of the latter having been written by
+Shakespeare, all I dare suggest is, that you may
+have ears,&mdash;for so has another animal,&mdash;but an ear
+you cannot have, <hi rend='italic'>me judice</hi>.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='183'/><anchor id='Pg183'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Richard III.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This play should be contrasted with <hi rend='italic'>Richard
+II.</hi> Pride of intellect is the characteristic of
+Richard, carried to the extent of even boasting to
+his own mind of his villany, whilst others are present
+to feed his pride of superiority; as in his first
+speech, act ii. sc. 1. Shakespeare here, as in all
+his great parts, developes in a tone of sublime
+morality the dreadful consequences of placing the
+moral, in subordination to the mere intellectual,
+being. In Richard there is a predominance of
+irony, accompanied with apparently blunt manners
+to those immediately about him, but formalised
+into a more set hypocrisy towards the people as
+represented by their magistrates.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='185'/><anchor id='Pg185'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Lear.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Of all Shakespeare's plays <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi> is the most
+rapid, <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi> the slowest, in
+movement. <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>
+combines length with rapidity,&mdash;like the hurricane
+and the whirlpool, absorbing while it advances. It
+begins as a stormy day in summer, with brightness;
+but that brightness is lurid, and anticipates
+the tempest.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It was not without forethought, nor is it without
+its due significance, that the division of Lear's
+kingdom is in the first six lines of the play stated
+as a thing already determined in all its particulars,
+previously to the trial of professions, as the relative
+rewards of which the daughters were to be made to
+consider their several portions. The strange, yet
+by no means unnatural, mixture of selfishness,
+sensibility, and habit of feeling derived from, and
+fostered by, the particular rank and usages of the
+individual;&mdash;the intense desire of being intensely
+beloved,&mdash;selfish, and yet characteristic of the selfishness
+of a loving and kindly nature alone;&mdash;the
+self-supportless leaning for all pleasure on another's
+breast;&mdash;the craving after sympathy with a prodigal
+disinterestedness, frustrated by its own ostentation,
+and the mode and nature of its claims;&mdash;the
+anxiety, the distrust, the jealousy, which more
+or less accompany all selfish affections, and are
+amongst the surest contradistinctions of mere fondness
+from true love, and which originate Lear's
+eager wish to enjoy his daughter's violent professions,
+<pb n='186'/><anchor id='Pg186'/>
+whilst the inveterate habits of sovereignty
+convert the wish into claim and positive right, and
+an incompliance with it into crime and treason;&mdash;these
+facts, these passions, these moral verities, on
+which the whole tragedy is founded, are all prepared
+for, and will to the retrospect be found
+implied, in these first four or five lines of the play.
+They let us know that the trial is but a trick; and
+that the grossness of the old king's rage is in part
+the natural result of a silly trick suddenly and
+most unexpectedly baffled and disappointed.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It may here be worthy of notice, that <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> is
+the only serious performance of Shakespeare, the
+interest and situations of which are derived from
+the assumption of a gross improbability; whereas
+Beaumont and Fletcher's tragedies are, almost all
+of them, founded on some out of the way accident
+or exception to the general experience of mankind.
+But observe the matchless judgment of our Shakespeare.
+First, improbable as the conduct of Lear
+is in the first scene, yet it was an old story rooted
+in the popular faith,&mdash;a thing taken for granted
+already, and consequently without any of the effects
+of improbability. Secondly, it is merely the canvass
+for the characters and passions,&mdash;a mere occasion
+for,&mdash;and not, in the manner of Beaumont and
+Fletcher, perpetually recurring as the cause, and
+<hi rend='italic'>sine qua non</hi> of,&mdash;the incidents and emotions. Let
+the first scene of this play have been lost, and let
+it only be understood that a fond father had been
+duped by hypocritical professions of love and duty
+on the part of two daughters to disinherit the third,
+previously, and deservedly, more dear to him;&mdash;and
+all the rest of the tragedy would retain its
+interest undiminished, and be perfectly intelligible.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='187'/><anchor id='Pg187'/>
+
+<p>
+The accidental is nowhere the groundwork of the
+passions, but that which is catholic, which in all
+ages has been, and ever will be, close and native to
+the heart of man,&mdash;parental anguish from filial
+ingratitude, the genuineness of worth, though
+coffined in bluntness, and the execrable vileness of
+a smooth iniquity. Perhaps I ought to have added
+the <hi rend='italic'>Merchant of Venice</hi>; but here too the same
+remarks apply. It was an old tale; and substitute
+any other danger than that of the pound of flesh
+(the circumstance in which the improbability lies),
+yet all the situations and the emotions appertaining
+to them remain equally excellent and appropriate.
+Whereas take away from the <hi rend='italic'>Mad Lover</hi> of Beaumont
+and Fletcher the fantastic hypothesis of his
+engagement to cut out his own heart, and have it
+presented to his mistress, and all the main scenes
+must go with it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Kotzebue is the German Beaumont and Fletcher,
+without their poetic powers, and without their <hi rend='italic'>vis
+comica</hi>. But, like them, he always deduces his
+situations and passions from marvellous accidents,
+and the trick of bringing one part of our moral
+nature to counteract another; as our pity for misfortune
+and admiration of generosity and courage
+to combat our condemnation of guilt as in adultery,
+robbery, and other heinous crimes;&mdash;and, like
+them too, he excels in his mode of telling a story
+clearly and interestingly, in a series of dramatic
+dialogues. Only the trick of making tragedy-heroes
+and heroines out of shopkeepers and barmaids was
+too low for the age, and too unpoetic for the genius,
+of Beaumont and Fletcher, inferior in every respect
+as they are to their great predecessor and contemporary.
+How inferior would they have appeared,
+<pb n='188'/><anchor id='Pg188'/>
+had not Shakespeare existed for them to imitate;&mdash;which
+in every play, more or less, they do, and in
+their tragedies most glaringly:&mdash;and yet&mdash;(O
+shame! shame!)&mdash;they miss no opportunity of
+sneering at the divine man, and sub-detracting
+from his merits!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To return to <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>. Having thus in the fewest
+words, and in a natural reply to as natural a question,&mdash;which
+yet answers the secondary purpose of
+attracting our attention to the difference or diversity
+between the characters of Cornwall and Albany,&mdash;provided
+the <hi rend='italic'>prémisses</hi> and <hi rend='italic'>data</hi>, as it were, for our
+after insight into the mind and mood of the person,
+whose character, passions, and sufferings are the
+main subject-matter of the play;&mdash;from Lear, the
+<hi rend='italic'>persona patiens</hi> of his drama, Shakespeare passes
+without delay to the second in importance, the chief
+agent and prime mover, and introduces Edmund to
+our acquaintance, preparing us with the same felicity
+of judgment, and in the same easy and natural
+way, for his character in the seemingly casual communication
+of its origin and occasion. From the
+first drawing up of the curtain Edmund has stood
+before us in the united strength and beauty of
+earliest manhood. Our eyes have been questioning
+him. Gifted as he is with high advantages of person,
+and further endowed by nature with a powerful
+intellect and a strong energetic will, even
+without any concurrence of circumstances and
+accident, pride will necessarily be the sin that most
+easily besets him. But Edmund is also the known
+and acknowledged son of the princely Gloster: he,
+therefore, has both the germ of pride, and the conditions
+best fitted to evolve and ripen it into a
+predominant feeling. Yet hitherto no reason appears
+<pb n='189'/><anchor id='Pg189'/>
+why it should be other than the not unusual
+pride of person, talent, and birth,&mdash;a pride auxiliary,
+if not akin, to many virtues, and the natural
+ally of honourable impulses. But alas! in his own
+presence his own father takes shame to himself for
+the frank avowal that he is his father,&mdash;he has
+<q>blushed so often to acknowledge him that he is
+now brazed to it!</q> Edmund hears the circumstances
+of his birth spoken of with a most degrading
+and licentious levity,&mdash;his mother described as a
+wanton by her own paramour, and the remembrance
+of the animal sting, the low criminal
+gratifications connected with her wantonness and
+prostituted beauty, assigned as the reason why
+<q>the whoreson must be acknowledged!</q> This,
+and the consciousness of its notoriety; the gnawing
+conviction that every show of respect is an effort of
+courtesy, which recalls, while it represses, a contrary
+feeling;&mdash;this is the ever trickling flow of
+wormwood and gall into the wounds of pride,&mdash;the
+corrosive <hi rend='italic'>virus</hi> which inoculates pride with a
+venom not its own, with envy, hatred, and a lust
+for that power which in its blaze of radiance would
+hide the dark spots on his disc,&mdash;with pangs of
+shame personally undeserved, and therefore felt as
+wrongs, and with a blind ferment of vindictive
+working towards the occasions and causes, especially
+towards a brother, whose stainless birth and
+lawful honours were the constant remembrancers
+of his own debasement, and were ever in the way
+to prevent all chance of its being unknown, or
+overlooked and forgotten. Add to this, that with
+excellent judgment, and provident for the claims of
+the moral sense,&mdash;for that which, relatively to the
+drama, is called poetic justice, and as the fittest
+<pb n='190'/><anchor id='Pg190'/>
+means for reconciling the feelings of the spectators
+to the horrors of Gloster's after sufferings,&mdash;at
+least, of rendering them somewhat less unendurable&mdash;(for
+I will not disguise my conviction, that
+in this one point the tragic in this play has been
+urged beyond the outermost mark and <hi rend='italic'>ne plus ultra</hi>
+of the dramatic);&mdash;Shakespeare has precluded all
+excuse and palliation of the guilt incurred by both
+the parents of the base-born Edmund, by Gloster's
+confession that he was at the time a married man,
+and already blest with a lawful heir of his fortunes.
+The mournful alienation of brotherly love, occasioned
+by the law of primogeniture in noble families,
+or rather by the unnecessary distinctions engrafted
+thereon, and this in children of the same stock, is
+still almost proverbial on the continent,&mdash;especially,
+as I know from my own observation, in the south
+of Europe,&mdash;and appears to have been scarcely less
+common in our own island before the Revolution
+of 1688, if we may judge from the characters and
+sentiments so frequent in our elder comedies.
+There is the younger brother, for instance, in
+Beaumont and Fletcher's play of the <hi rend='italic'>Scornful
+Lady</hi>, on the one side, and Oliver in Shakespeare's
+<hi rend='italic'>As You Like It</hi>, on the other. Need it be said how
+heavy an aggravation, in such a case, the stain
+of bastardy must have been, were it only that the
+younger brother was liable to hear his own dishonour
+and his mother's infamy related by his
+father with an excusing shrug of the shoulders,
+and in a tone betwixt waggery and shame!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+By the circumstances here enumerated as so
+many predisposing causes, Edmund's character
+might well be deemed already sufficiently explained;
+and our minds prepared for it. But in
+<pb n='191'/><anchor id='Pg191'/>
+this tragedy the story or fable constrained Shakespeare
+to introduce wickedness in an outrageous
+form in the persons of Regan and Goneril. He
+had read nature too heedfully not to know that
+courage, intellect, and strength of character are
+the most impressive forms of power, and that to
+power in itself, without reference to any moral
+end, an inevitable admiration and complacency
+appertains, whether it be displayed in the conquests
+of a Buonaparte or Tamerlane, or in the
+foam and the thunder of a cataract. But in the
+exhibition of such a character it was of the highest
+importance to prevent the guilt from passing into
+utter monstrosity,&mdash;which again depends on the
+presence or absence of causes and temptations
+sufficient to account for the wickedness, without
+the necessity of recurring to a thorough fiendishness
+of nature for its origination. For such are
+the appointed relations of intellectual power to
+truth, and of truth to goodness, that it becomes
+both morally and poetically unsafe to present
+what is admirable&mdash;what our nature compels us to
+admire&mdash;in the mind, and what is most detestable
+in the heart, as co-existing in the same individual
+without any apparent connection, or any modification
+of the one by the other. That Shakespeare
+has in one instance, that of Iago, approached to
+this, and that he has done it successfully, is
+perhaps the most astonishing proof of his genius,
+and the opulence of its resources. But in the
+present tragedy, in which he was compelled to
+present a Goneril and a Regan, it was most carefully
+to be avoided;&mdash;and therefore the only one
+conceivable addition to the inauspicious influences
+on the preformation of Edmund's character is
+<pb n='192'/><anchor id='Pg192'/>
+given, in the information that all the kindly
+counteractions to the mischievous feelings of
+shame, which might have been derived from co-domestication
+with Edgar and their common
+father, had been cut off by his absence from home,
+and foreign education from boyhood to the present
+time, and a prospect of its continuance, as if to
+preclude all risk of his interference with the
+father's views for the elder and legitimate son:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>He hath been out nine years, and away he shall again.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Cor.</hi> Nothing my lord.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Lear.</hi> Nothing?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cor.</hi> Nothing.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Lear.</hi> Nothing can come of nothing: speak again.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cor.</hi> Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave</l>
+<l>My heart into my mouth: I love your majesty</l>
+<l><q rend="post">According to my bond; nor more, nor less.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There is something of disgust at the ruthless
+hypocrisy of her sisters, and some little faulty
+admixture of pride and sullenness in Cordelia's
+<q>Nothing;</q> and her tone is well contrived, indeed,
+to lessen the glaring absurdity of Lear's
+conduct, but answers the yet more important purpose
+of forcing away the attention from the
+nursery-tale, the moment it has served its end,
+that of supplying the canvas for the picture. This
+is also materially furthered by Kent's opposition,
+which displays Lear's moral incapability of resigning
+the sovereign power in the very act of disposing
+of it. Kent is, perhaps, the nearest to
+perfect goodness in all Shakespeare's characters,
+and yet the most individualised. There is an
+extraordinary charm, in his bluntness, which is
+that only of a nobleman, arising from a contempt
+of overstrained courtesy, and combined with easy
+<pb n='193'/><anchor id='Pg193'/>
+placability where goodness of heart is apparent.
+His passionate affection for, and fidelity to, Lear
+act on our feelings in Lear's own favour: virtue
+itself seems to be in company with him.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Edmund's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Who, in the lusty stealth of nature, take</q></l>
+<l>More composition and fierce quality</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Than doth,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's note upon a quotation from Vanini.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Poor Vanini!&mdash;Any one but Warburton would
+have thought this precious passage more characteristic
+of Mr. Shandy than of atheism. If the
+fact really were so (which it is not, but almost the
+contrary) I do not see why the most confirmed
+theist might not very naturally utter the same
+wish. But it is proverbial that the youngest son
+in a large family is commonly the man of the
+greatest talents in it; and as good an authority as
+Vanini has said&mdash;<q>incalescere in venerem ardentius,
+spei sobolis injuriosum esse.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In this speech of Edmund you see, as soon as a
+man cannot reconcile himself to reason, how his
+conscience flies off by way of appeal to nature,
+who is sure upon such occasions never to find
+fault, and also how shame sharpens a predisposition
+in the heart to evil. For it is a profound
+moral, that shame will naturally generate guilt;
+the oppressed will be vindictive, like Shylock, and
+in the anguish of undeserved ignominy the delusion
+secretly springs up of getting over the moral
+quality of an action by fixing the mind on the
+mere physical act alone.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Edmund's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>This is the excellent foppery of the world! that, when we are
+sick in fortune (often the surfeit of our own behaviour), we make
+guilty of our disasters, the sun, the moon, and the stars,</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<pb n='194'/><anchor id='Pg194'/>
+
+<p>
+Thus scorn and misanthropy are often the anticipations
+and mouth-pieces of wisdom in the detection
+of superstitions. Both individuals and
+nations may be free from such prejudices by being
+below them, as well as by rising above them.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. The Steward should be placed in
+exact antithesis to Kent, as the only character of
+utter irredeemable baseness in Shakespeare. Even
+in this the judgment and invention of the poet are
+very observable;&mdash;for what else could the willing
+tool of a Goneril be? Not a vice but this of baseness
+was left open to him.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. In Lear old age is itself a character,&mdash;its
+natural imperfections being increased by
+life-long habits of receiving a prompt obedience.
+Any addition of individuality would have been
+unnecessary and painful; for the relations of
+others to him, of wondrous fidelity and of frightful
+ingratitude, alone sufficiently distinguish him.
+Thus Lear becomes the open and ample play-room
+of nature's passions.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Knight.</hi> Since my
+young lady's going into France, Sir; the</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">fool hath much pined away.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The Fool is no comic buffoon to make the
+groundlings laugh,&mdash;no forced condescension of
+Shakespeare's genius to the taste of his audience.
+Accordingly the poet prepares for his introduction,
+which he never does with any of his common
+clowns and fools, by bringing him into living connection
+with the pathos of the play. He is as
+wonderful a creation as Caliban;&mdash;his wild babblings,
+and inspired idiocy, articulate and gauge
+the horrors of the scene.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The monster Goneril prepares what is necessary,
+<pb n='195'/><anchor id='Pg195'/>
+while the character of Albany renders a still more
+maddening grievance possible&mdash;namely, Regan
+and Cornwall in perfect sympathy of monstrosity.
+Not a sentiment, not an image, which can give
+pleasure on its own account is admitted; whenever
+these creatures are introduced, and they are
+brought forward as little as possible, pure horror
+reigns throughout. In this scene and in all the
+early speeches of Lear, the one general sentiment
+of filial ingratitude prevails as the main-spring of
+the feelings;&mdash;in this early stage the outward
+object causing the pressure on the mind, which is
+not yet sufficiently familiarised with the anguish
+for the imagination to work upon it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Gon.</hi> Do you mark that, my lord?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Alb.</hi> I cannot be so partial, Goneril,</l>
+<l>To the great love I bear you.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Gon.</hi> Pray you content,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Observe the baffled endeavour of Goneril to act
+on the fears of Albany, and yet his passiveness,
+his <emph>inertia</emph>; he is not convinced, and yet he is
+afraid of looking into the thing. Such characters
+always yield to those who will take the trouble of
+governing them, or for them. Perhaps the influence
+of a princess, whose choice of him had
+royalised his state, may be some little excuse for
+Albany's weakness.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Lear.</hi> O let me not be mad,
+not mad, sweet heaven!</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Keep me in temper! I would not be mad!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The mind's own anticipation of madness! The
+deepest tragic notes are often struck by a half
+sense of an impending blow. The Fool's conclusion
+of this act by a grotesque prattling seems to
+<pb n='196'/><anchor id='Pg196'/>
+indicate the dislocation of feeling that has begun
+and is to be continued.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Edmund's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">He replied,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Thou unpossessing bastard!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Thus the secret poison in Edmund's own heart
+steals forth; and then observe poor Gloster's&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Loyal and <emph>natural</emph> boy!</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+as if praising the crime of Edmund's birth!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Compare Regan's&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">What, did <emph>my father's</emph> godson seek your life?</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">He whom <emph>my father</emph> named?</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+with the unfeminine violence of her&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>All vengeance comes too short,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and yet no reference to the guilt, but only to the
+accident, which she uses as an occasion for sneering
+at her father. Regan is not, in fact, a greater
+monster than Goneril, but she has the power of
+casting more venom.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Cornwall's speech:&mdash;-
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">This is some fellow,</q></l>
+<l>Who, having been praised for bluntness, doth affect</l>
+<l><q rend="post">A saucy roughness,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In thus placing these profound general truths
+in the mouths of such men as Cornwall, Edmund,
+Iago, &amp;c., Shakespeare at once gives them utterance,
+and yet shows how indefinite their application
+is.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Edgar's assumed madness serves the
+great purpose of taking off part of the shock
+which would otherwise be caused by the true
+madness of Lear, and further displays the profound
+difference between the two. In every
+attempt at representing madness throughout the
+<pb n='197'/><anchor id='Pg197'/>
+whole range of dramatic literature, with the single
+exception of Lear, it is mere lightheadedness, as
+especially in Otway. In Edgar's ravings Shakespeare
+all the while lets you see a fixed purpose, a
+practical end in view;&mdash;in Lear's, there is only
+the brooding of the one anguish, an eddy without
+progression.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. Lear's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The king would speak with Cornwall; the dear father</q></l>
+<l>Would with his daughter speak, &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post">No, but not yet: may be he is not well,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The strong interest now felt by Lear to try to
+find excuses for his daughter is most pathetic.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Lear's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Beloved Regan,</q></l>
+<l>Thy sister's naught;&mdash;O Regan, she hath tied</l>
+<l>Sharp-tooth'd unkindness, like a vulture, here.</l>
+<l>I can scarce speak to thee;&mdash;thou'lt not believe</l>
+<l>Of how deprav'd a quality&mdash;O Regan!</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Reg.</hi> I pray you, Sir, take patience; I have hope,</l>
+<l>You less know how to value her desert,</l>
+<l>Than she to scant her duty.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Lear.</hi> Say, how is that?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Nothing is so heart-cutting as a cold unexpected
+defence or palliation of a cruelty passionately
+complained of, or so expressive of thorough hard-heartedness.
+And feel the excessive horror of
+Regan's <q>O, Sir, you are old!</q>&mdash;and then her
+drawing from that universal object of reverence
+and indulgence the very reason for her frightful
+conclusion&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Say, you have wrong'd her!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+All Lear's faults increase our pity for him. We
+refuse to know them otherwise than as means of
+his sufferings, and aggravations of his daughters'
+ingratitude.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='198'/><anchor id='Pg198'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Lear's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">O, reason not the need: our basest beggars</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Are in the poorest thing superfluous,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Observe that the tranquillity which follows the
+first stunning of the blow permits Lear to reason.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 4. O, what a world's convention of
+agonies is here! All external nature in a storm,
+all moral nature convulsed,&mdash;the real madness of
+Lear, the feigned madness of Edgar, the babbling
+of the Fool, the desperate fidelity of Kent&mdash;surely
+such a scene was never conceived before or since!
+Take it but as a picture for the eye only, it is
+more terrific than any which a Michael Angelo,
+inspired by a Dante, could have conceived, and
+which none but a Michael Angelo could have
+executed. Or let it have been uttered to the
+blind, the howlings of nature would seem converted
+into the voice of conscious humanity. This
+scene ends with the first symptoms of positive
+derangement; and the intervention of the fifth
+scene is particularly judicious,&mdash;the interruption
+allowing an interval for Lear to appear in full
+madness in the sixth scene.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 7. Gloster's blinding.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+What can I say of this scene?&mdash;There is my
+reluctance to think Shakespeare wrong, and yet&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 6. Lear's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Ha! Goneril!&mdash;with a white beard!&mdash;They flattered me like a
+dog; and told me, I had white hairs in my beard, ere the black ones
+were there. To say <emph>Ay</emph> and <emph>No</emph> to every thing
+I said!&mdash;Ay and
+No too was no good divinity. When the rain came to wet me
+once,</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+The thunder recurs, but still at a greater distance
+from our feelings.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='199'/><anchor id='Pg199'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 7. Lear's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Where have I been? Where am I?&mdash;Fair daylight?&mdash;</q></l>
+<l>I am mightily abused.&mdash;I should even die with pity</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To see another thus,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+How beautifully the affecting return of Lear to
+reason, and the mild pathos of these speeches prepare
+the mind for the last sad, yet sweet, consolation
+of the aged sufferer's death!
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='201'/><anchor id='Pg201'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Hamlet.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Hamlet was the play, or rather Hamlet himself
+was the character, in the intuition and
+exposition of which I first made my turn for philosophical
+criticism, and especially for insight into
+the genius of Shakespeare, noticed. This happened
+first amongst my acquaintances, as Sir George
+Beaumont will bear witness; and subsequently,
+long before Schlegel had delivered at Vienna the
+lectures on Shakespeare, which he afterwards published,
+I had given on the same subject eighteen
+lectures substantially the same, proceeding from
+the very same point of view, and deducing the
+same conclusions, so far as I either then agreed,
+or now agree, with him. I gave these lectures at
+the Royal Institution, before six or seven hundred
+auditors of rank and eminence, in the spring of the
+same year, in which Sir Humphrey Davy, a fellow-lecturer,
+made his great revolutionary discoveries
+in chemistry. Even in detail the coincidence of
+Schlegel with my lectures was so extraordinary,
+that all who at a later period heard the same words,
+taken by me from my notes of the lectures at the
+Royal Institution, concluded a borrowing on my
+part from Schlegel. Mr. Hazlitt, whose hatred of
+me is in such an inverse ratio to my zealous kindness
+towards him, as to be defended by his warmest
+admirer, Charles Lamb&mdash;(who, God bless him!
+besides his characteristic obstinacy of adherence to
+old friends, as long at least as they are at all down
+<pb n='202'/><anchor id='Pg202'/>
+in the world, is linked as by a charm to Hazlitt's
+conversation)&mdash;only as <q>frantic;</q>&mdash;Mr. Hazlitt, I
+say, himself replied to an assertion of my plagiarism
+from Schlegel in these words;&mdash;<q>That is a lie;
+for I myself heard the very same character of
+Hamlet from Coleridge before he went to Germany,
+and when he had neither read nor could
+read a page of German!</q> Now Hazlitt was on a
+visit to me at my cottage at Nether Stowey, Somerset,
+in the summer of the year 1798, in the September
+of which year I first was out of sight of the
+shores of Great Britain.&mdash;Recorded by me, S. T.
+Coleridge, 7th January, 1819.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The seeming inconsistencies in the conduct and
+character of Hamlet have long exercised the conjectural
+ingenuity of critics; and, as we are always
+loth to suppose that the cause of defective apprehension
+is in ourselves, the mystery has been too
+commonly explained by the very easy process of
+setting it down as in fact inexplicable, and by resolving
+the phenomenon into a misgrowth or <hi rend='italic'>lusus</hi>
+of the capricious and irregular genius of Shakespeare.
+The shallow and stupid arrogance of these
+vulgar and indolent decisions I would fain do my
+best to expose. I believe the character of Hamlet
+may be traced to Shakespeare's deep and accurate
+science in mental philosophy. Indeed, that this
+character must have some connection with the
+common fundamental laws of our nature may be
+assumed from the fact, that Hamlet has been the
+darling of every country in which the literature of
+England has been fostered. In order to understand
+him, it is essential that we should reflect on
+the constitution of our own minds. Man is distinguished
+from the brute animals in proportion as
+<pb n='203'/><anchor id='Pg203'/>
+thought prevails over sense: but in the healthy
+processes of the mind, a balance is constantly maintained
+between the impressions from outward objects
+and the inward operations of the intellect;&mdash;for
+if there be an overbalance in the contemplative
+faculty, man thereby becomes the creature of mere
+meditation, and loses his natural power of action.
+Now one of Shakespeare's modes of creating characters
+is, to conceive any one intellectual or moral
+faculty in morbid excess, and then to place himself,
+Shakespeare, thus mutilated or diseased, under given
+circumstances. In Hamlet he seems to have wished
+to exemplify the moral necessity of a due balance
+between our attention to the objects of our senses,
+and our meditation on the workings of our minds,&mdash;an
+<emph>equilibrium</emph> between the real and the imaginary
+worlds. In Hamlet this balance is disturbed: his
+thoughts, and the images of his fancy, are far more
+vivid than his actual perceptions, and his very perceptions,
+instantly passing through the <emph>medium</emph> of
+his contemplations, acquire, as they pass, a form
+and a colour not naturally their own. Hence we
+see a great, an almost enormous, intellectual activity,
+and a proportionate aversion to real action,
+consequent upon it, with all its symptoms and
+accompanying qualities. This character Shakespeare
+places in circumstances, under which it is
+obliged to act on the spur of the moment:&mdash;Hamlet
+is brave and careless of death; but he vacillates
+from sensibility, and procrastinates from thought,
+and loses the power of action in the energy of
+resolve. Thus it is that this tragedy presents a
+direct contrast to that of <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>; the one proceeds
+with the utmost slowness, the other with a
+crowded and breathless rapidity.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='204'/><anchor id='Pg204'/>
+
+<p>
+The effect of this overbalance of the imaginative
+power is beautifully illustrated in the everlasting
+broodings and superfluous activities of Hamlet's
+mind, which, unseated from its healthy relation, is
+constantly occupied with the world within, and abstracted
+from the world without,&mdash;giving substance
+to shadows, and throwing a mist over all commonplace
+actualities. It is the nature of thought to be
+indefinite;&mdash;definiteness belongs to external imagery
+alone. Hence it is that the sense of sublimity
+arises, not from the sight of an outward object,
+but from the beholder's reflection upon it;&mdash;not
+from the sensuous impression, but from the imaginative
+reflex. Few have seen a celebrated waterfall
+without feeling something akin to disappointment:
+it is only subsequently that the image comes back
+full into the mind, and brings with it a train of
+grand or beautiful associations. Hamlet feels this;
+his senses are in a state of trance, and he looks
+upon external things as hieroglyphics. His soliloquy&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O! that this too too solid flesh would melt,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+springs from that craving after the indefinite&mdash;for
+that which is not&mdash;which most easily besets men
+of genius; and the self-delusion common to this
+temper of mind is finely exemplified in the character
+which Hamlet gives of himself;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">It cannot be</q></l>
+<l>But I am pigeon-liver'd, and lack gall</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To make oppression bitter.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+He mistakes the seeing his chains for the breaking
+them, delays action till action is of no use, and dies
+the victim of mere circumstance and accident.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+There is a great significancy in the names of
+Shakespeare's plays. In the <hi rend='italic'>Twelfth Night</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Midsummer
+<pb n='205'/><anchor id='Pg205'/>
+Night's Dream</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>As You Like It</hi>, and
+<hi rend='italic'>Winter's Tale</hi>, the total effect is produced by a
+co-ordination of the characters as in a wreath of
+flowers. But in <hi rend='italic'>Coriolanus</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and Juliet</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>, &amp;c.,
+the effect arises from the subordination
+of all to one, either as the prominent
+person, or the principal object. <hi rend='italic'>Cymbeline</hi> is the
+only exception; and even that has its advantages
+in preparing the audience for the chaos of time,
+place, and costume, by throwing the date back
+into a fabulous king's reign.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But as of more importance, so more striking, is
+the judgment displayed by our truly dramatic poet,
+as well as poet of the drama, in the management
+of his first scenes. With the single exception of
+<hi rend='italic'>Cymbeline</hi>, they either place before us at one glance
+both the past and the future in some effect, which
+implies the continuance and full agency of its cause,
+as in the feuds and party-spirit of the servants of
+the two houses in the first scene of <hi rend='italic'>Romeo and
+Juliet</hi>; or in the degrading passion for shows and
+public spectacles, and the overwhelming attachment
+for the newest successful war-chief in the
+Roman people, already become a populace, contrasted
+with the jealousy of the nobles in <hi rend='italic'>Julius
+Cæsar</hi>;&mdash;or they at once commence the action so
+as to excite a curiosity for the explanation in the
+following scenes, as in the storm of wind and waves,
+and the boatswain in the <hi rend='italic'>Tempest</hi>, instead of anticipating
+our curiosity, as in most other first scenes,
+and in too many other first acts;&mdash;or they act, by
+contrast of diction suited to the characters, at once
+to heighten the effect, and yet to give a naturalness
+to the language and rhythm of the principal personages,
+either as that of Prospero and Miranda
+<pb n='206'/><anchor id='Pg206'/>
+by the appropriate lowness of the style, or as in
+<hi rend='italic'>King John</hi>, by the equally appropriate stateliness
+of official harangues or narratives, so that the after
+blank verse seems to belong to the rank and quality
+of the speakers, and not to the poet;&mdash;or they
+strike at once the key-note, and give the predominant
+spirit of the play, as in the <hi rend='italic'>Twelfth Night</hi> and
+in <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>;&mdash;or finally, the first scene comprises
+all these advantages at once, as in <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Compare the easy language of common life, in
+which this drama commences, with the direful music
+and wild wayward rhythm and abrupt lyrics of
+the opening of <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>. The tone is quite familiar;&mdash;there
+is no poetic description of night, no elaborate
+information conveyed by one speaker to another
+of what both had immediately before their senses&mdash;(such
+as the first distich in Addison's <hi rend='italic'>Cato</hi>, which
+is a translation into poetry of <q>Past four o'clock
+and a dark morning!</q>);&mdash;and yet nothing bordering
+on the comic on the one hand, nor any striving
+of the intellect on the other. It is precisely the
+language of sensation among men who feared no
+charge of effeminacy for feeling what they had no
+want of resolution to bear. Yet the armour, the
+dead silence, the watchfulness that first interrupts
+it, the welcome relief of the guard, the cold, the
+broken expressions of compelled attention to bodily
+feelings still under control&mdash;all excellently accord
+with, and prepare for, the after gradual rise into
+tragedy;&mdash;but, above all, into a tragedy, the interest
+of which is as eminently <hi rend='italic'>ad et apud intra</hi>, as
+that of <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi> is directly <hi rend='italic'>ad extra</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In all the best attested stories of ghosts and
+visions, as in that of Brutus, of Archbishop Cranmer,
+that of Benvenuto Cellini recorded by himself,
+<pb n='207'/><anchor id='Pg207'/>
+and the vision of Galileo communicated by him to
+his favourite pupil Torricelli, the ghost-seers were
+in a state of cold or chilling damp from without,
+and of anxiety inwardly. It has been with all of
+them as with Francisco on his guard,&mdash;alone, in
+the depth and silence of the night; <q>'twas bitter
+cold, and they were sick at heart, and <emph>not a mouse
+stirring</emph>.</q> The attention to minute sounds,&mdash;naturally
+associated with the recollection of minute
+objects, and the more familiar and trifling, the more
+impressive from the unusualness of their producing
+any impression at all&mdash;gives a philosophic pertinency
+to this last image; but it has likewise its
+dramatic use and purpose. For its commonness in
+ordinary conversation tends to produce the sense of
+reality, and at once hides the poet, and yet approximates
+the reader or spectator to that state in which
+the highest poetry will appear, and in its component
+parts, though not in the whole composition, really
+is, the language of nature. If I should not speak
+it, I feel that I should be thinking it;&mdash;the voice
+only is the poet's,&mdash;the words are my own. That
+Shakespeare meant to put an effect in the actor's
+power in the very first words&mdash;<q>Who's there?</q>&mdash;is
+evident from the impatience expressed by the
+startled Francisco in the words that follow&mdash;<q>Nay,
+answer me: stand and unfold yourself.</q> A brave
+man is never so peremptory, as when he fears that
+he is afraid. Observe the gradual transition from
+the silence and the still recent habit of listening in
+Francisco's&mdash;<q>I think I hear them</q>&mdash;to the more
+cheerful call out, which a good actor would observe,
+in the&mdash;<q>Stand ho! Who is there?</q> Bernardo's
+inquiry after Horatio, and the repetition of his
+name and in his own presence indicate a respect or
+<pb n='208'/><anchor id='Pg208'/>
+an eagerness that implies him as one of the persons
+who are in the foreground; and the scepticism
+attributed to him,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Horatio says, 'tis but our fantasy;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And will not let belief take hold of him,</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+prepares us for Hamlet's after eulogy on him as
+one whose blood and judgment were happily commingled.
+The actor should also be careful to distinguish
+the expectation and gladness of Bernardo's
+<q>Welcome, Horatio!</q> from the mere courtesy of
+his <q>Welcome, good Marcellus!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Now observe the admirable indefiniteness of the
+first opening out of the occasion of all this anxiety.
+The preparation informative of the audience is just
+as much as was precisely necessary, and no more;&mdash;it
+begins with the uncertainty appertaining to
+a question:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Mar.</hi> What, has <emph>this thing</emph>
+appear'd again to-night?</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Even the word <q>again</q> has its <emph>credibilising</emph> effect.
+Then Horatio, the representative of the ignorance
+of the audience, not himself, but by Marcellus to
+Bernardo, anticipates the common solution&mdash;<q>'tis
+but our fantasy!</q> upon which Marcellus rises
+into&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>This dreaded sight, twice seen of us</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+which immediately afterwards becomes <q>this apparition,</q>
+and that, too, an intelligent spirit&mdash;that
+is, to be spoken to! Then comes the confirmation
+of Horatio's disbelief;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Tush! tush! 'twill not appear!</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and the silence, with which the scene opened, is
+again restored in the shivering feeling of Horatio
+sitting down, at such a time, and with the two
+eye-witnesses, to hear a story of a ghost, and that,
+<pb n='209'/><anchor id='Pg209'/>
+too, of a ghost which had appeared twice before at
+the very same hour. In the deep feeling which
+Bernardo has of the solemn nature of what he is
+about to relate, he makes an effort to master his
+own imaginative terrors by an elevation of style,&mdash;itself
+a continuation of the effort,&mdash;and by turning
+off from the apparition, as from something
+which would force him too deeply into himself, to
+the outward objects, the realities of nature, which
+had accompanied it:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ber.</hi> Last night of all,</q></l>
+<l>When yon same star, that's westward from the pole</l>
+<l>Had made his course to illume that part of heaven</l>
+<l>Where now it burns, Marcellus and myself,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The bell then beating one.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This passage seems to contradict the critical
+law that what is told, makes a faint impression
+compared with what is beholden; for it does
+indeed convey to the mind more than the eye can
+see; whilst the interruption of the narrative at the
+very moment when we are most intensely listening
+for the sequel, and have our thoughts diverted
+from the dreaded sight in expectation of the
+desired, yet almost dreaded, tale&mdash;this gives all
+the suddenness and surprise of the original appearance:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Mar.</hi> Peace, break thee off;
+look, where it comes again!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Note the judgment displayed in having the two
+persons present, who, as having seen the Ghost
+before, are naturally eager in confirming their
+former opinions,&mdash;whilst the sceptic is silent, and
+after having been twice addressed by his friends,
+answers with two hasty syllables&mdash;<q>Most like,</q>&mdash;and
+a confession of horror:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>It harrows me with fear and wonder.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+O heaven! words are wasted on those who feel,
+<pb n='210'/><anchor id='Pg210'/>
+and to those who do not feel the exquisite judgment
+of Shakespeare in this scene, what can be
+said? Hume himself could not but have had
+faith in this Ghost dramatically, let his anti-ghostism
+have been as strong as Sampson against
+other ghosts less powerfully raised.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Mar.</hi> Good now, sit down, and tell
+me, he that knows,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Why this same strict and most observant watch,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+How delightfully natural is the transition, to the
+retrospective narrative! And observe, upon the
+Ghost's reappearance, how much Horatio's courage
+is increased by having translated the late individual
+spectator into general thought and past
+experience,&mdash;and the sympathy of Marcellus and
+Bernardo with his patriotic surmises in daring to
+strike at the Ghost; whilst in a moment, upon its
+vanishing, the former solemn awe-stricken feeling
+returns upon them:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">We do it wrong, being so majestical,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">To offer it the show of violence.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Horatio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">I have heard,</q></l>
+<l>The cock, that is the trumpet to the morn,</l>
+<l>Doth with his lofty and shrill-sounding throat</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Awake the god of day,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+No Addison could be more careful to be poetical
+in diction than Shakespeare in providing the
+grounds and sources of its propriety. But how to
+elevate a thing almost mean by its familiarity,
+young poets may learn in this treatment of the
+cock-crow.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Horatio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">And, by my advice,</q></l>
+<l>Let us impart what we have seen to-night</l>
+<l>Unto young Hamlet; for, upon my life,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The spirit, dumb to us, will speak to him.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='211'/><anchor id='Pg211'/>
+
+<p>
+Note the inobtrusive and yet fully adequate mode
+of introducing the main character, <q>young
+Hamlet,</q> upon whom it transferred all the interest
+excited for the acts and concerns of the king his
+father.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. The audience are now relieved by a
+change of scene to the royal court, in order that
+Hamlet may not have to take up the leavings of
+exhaustion. In the king's speech, observe the set
+and pedantically antithetic form of the sentences
+when touching that which galled the heels of conscience,&mdash;the
+strain of undignified rhetoric,&mdash;and
+yet in what follows concerning the public weal, a
+certain appropriate majesty. Indeed was he not a
+royal brother?&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> King's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>And now, Laertes, what's the news with you?</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Thus with great art Shakespeare introduces a most
+important, but still subordinate character first,
+Laertes, who is yet thus graciously treated in consequence
+of the assistance given to the election
+of the late king's brother instead of his son by
+Polonius.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> A little more than kin,
+and less than kind.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>King.</hi> How is it that the clouds still hang on you?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Not so, my lord, I
+am too much i' the sun.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Hamlet opens his mouth with a playing on
+words, the complete absence of which throughout
+characterises Macbeth. This playing on words
+may be attributed to many causes or motives, as
+either to an exuberant activity of mind, as in the
+higher comedy of Shakespeare generally;&mdash;or to an
+imitation of it as a mere fashion, as if it were said&mdash;<q>Is
+not this better than groaning?</q>&mdash;or to a contemptuous
+<pb n='212'/><anchor id='Pg212'/>
+exultation in minds vulgarised and overset
+by their success, as in the poetic instance of
+Milton's Devils in the battle;&mdash;or it is the language
+of resentment, as is familiar to every one who has
+witnessed the quarrels of the lower orders, where
+there is invariably a profusion of punning invective,
+whence, perhaps, nicknames have in a considerable
+degree sprung up;&mdash;or it is the language
+of suppressed passion, and especially of a hardly
+smothered personal dislike. The first and last of
+these combine in Hamlet's case; and I have little
+doubt that Farmer is right in supposing the equivocation
+carried on in the expression <q>too much i'
+the sun,</q> or son.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Ay, madam, it is common.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Here observe Hamlet's delicacy to his mother, and
+how the suppression prepares him for the overflow
+in the next speech, in which his character is more
+developed by bringing forward his aversion to externals,
+and which betrays his habit of brooding
+over the world within him, coupled with a prodigality
+of beautiful words, which are the half embodyings
+of thought, and are more than thought,
+and have an outness, a reality <hi rend='italic'>sui generis</hi>, and yet
+retain their correspondence and shadowy affinity
+to the images and movements within. Note also
+Hamlet's silence to the long speech of the king
+which follows, and his respectful, but general,
+answer to his mother.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Hamlet's first soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">O, that this too too solid flesh would melt,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This <hi rend='italic'>tædium vitæ</hi> is a common oppression on
+minds cast in the Hamlet mould, and is caused by
+<pb n='213'/><anchor id='Pg213'/>
+disproportionate mental exertion, which necessitates
+exhaustion of bodily feeling. Where there
+is a just coincidence of external and internal
+action, pleasure is always the result; but where
+the former is deficient, and the mind's appetency
+of the ideal is unchecked, realities will seem cold
+and unmoving. In such cases, passion combines
+itself with the indefinite alone. In this mood of
+his mind the relation of the appearance of his
+father's spirit in arms is made all at once to
+Hamlet:&mdash;it is&mdash;Horatio's speech in particular&mdash;a
+perfect model of the true style of dramatic narrative;&mdash;the
+purest poetry, and yet in the most
+natural language, equally remote from the ink-horn
+and the plough.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. This scene must be regarded as one
+of Shakespeare's lyric movements in the play, and
+the skill with which it is interwoven with the
+dramatic parts is peculiarly an excellence of our
+poet. You experience the sensation of a pause
+without the sense of a stop. You will observe in
+Ophelia's short and general answer to the long
+speech of Laertes the natural carelessness of innocence,
+which cannot think such a code of cautions
+and prudences necessary to its own preservation.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Polonius (in Stockdale's
+edition):&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Or (not to crack the wind of the poor phrase),</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Wronging it thus, you'll tender me a fool.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I suspect this <q>wronging</q> is here used much in
+the same sense as <q>wringing</q> or <q>wrenching,</q>
+and that the parenthesis should be extended to
+<q>thus.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Polonius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">How prodigal the soul</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Lends the tongue vows:&mdash;these blazes, daughter,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='214'/><anchor id='Pg214'/>
+
+<p>
+A spondee has, I doubt not, dropped out of the
+text. Either insert <q>Go to</q> after <q>vows</q>;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Lends the tongue vows: Go to, these blazes, daughter</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+or read&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Lends the tongue vows:&mdash;These blazes, daughter, mark you</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Shakespeare never introduces a catalectic line
+without intending an equivalent to the foot omitted
+in the pauses, or the dwelling emphasis, or the
+diffused retardation. I do not, however, deny that
+a good actor might, by employing the last mentioned
+means&mdash;namely, the retardation, or solemn
+knowing drawl&mdash;supply the missing spondee with
+good effect. But I do not believe that in this or
+any other of the foregoing speeches of Polonius,
+Shakespeare meant to bring out the senility or
+weakness of that personage's mind. In the great
+ever-recurring dangers and duties of life, where
+to distinguish the fit objects for the application of
+the maxims collected by the experience of a long
+life, requires no fineness of tact, as in the admonitions
+to his son and daughter, Polonius is uniformly
+made respectable. But if an actor were
+even capable of catching these shades in the character,
+the pit and the gallery would be malcontent
+at their exhibition. It is to Hamlet that Polonius
+is, and is meant to be, contemptible, because in
+inwardness and uncontrollable activity of movement,
+Hamlet's mind is the logical contrary to
+that of Polonius; and besides, as I have observed
+before, Hamlet dislikes the man as false to his true
+allegiance in the matter of the succession to the
+crown.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. The unimportant conversation with
+which this scene opens is a proof of Shakespeare's
+<pb n='215'/><anchor id='Pg215'/>
+minute knowledge of human nature. It is a well
+established fact, that on the brink of any serious
+enterprise, or event of moment, men almost invariably
+endeavour to elude the pressure of their
+own thoughts by turning aside to trivial objects
+and familiar circumstances: thus this dialogue on
+the platform begins with remarks on the coldness
+of the air, and inquiries, obliquely connected,
+indeed, with the expected hour of the visitation,
+but thrown out in a seeming vacuity of topics, as
+to the striking of the clock and so forth. The
+same desire to escape from the impending thought
+is carried on in Hamlet's account of, and moralizing
+on, the Danish custom of wassailing: he runs off
+from the particular to the universal, and, in his
+repugnance to personal and individual concerns,
+escapes, as it were, from himself in generalisations,
+and smothers the impatience and uneasy feelings
+of the moment in abstract reasoning. Besides
+this, another purpose is answered;&mdash;for by thus
+entangling the attention of the audience in the
+nice distinctions and parenthetical sentences of
+this speech of Hamlet's, Shakespeare takes them
+completely by surprise on the appearance of the
+Ghost, which comes upon them in all the suddenness
+of its visionary character. Indeed, no modern
+writer would have dared, like Shakespeare, to have
+preceded this last visitation by two distinct appearances,&mdash;or
+could have contrived that the third
+should rise upon the former two in impressiveness
+and solemnity of interest.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But in addition to all the other excellences of
+Hamlet's speech concerning the wassail-music&mdash;so
+finely revealing the predominant idealism, the
+ratiocinative meditativeness, of his character&mdash;it
+<pb n='216'/><anchor id='Pg216'/>
+has the advantage of giving nature and probability
+to the impassioned continuity of the speech
+instantly directed to the Ghost. The <emph>momentum</emph>
+had been given to his mental activity; the full
+current of the thoughts and words had set in, and
+the very forgetfulness, in the fervour of his argumentation,
+of the purpose for which he was there,
+aided in preventing the appearance from benumbing
+the mind. Consequently, it acted as a new
+impulse,&mdash;a sudden stroke which increased the
+velocity of the body already in motion, whilst it
+altered the direction. The co-presence of Horatio,
+Marcellus, and Bernardo is most judiciously contrived;
+for it renders the courage of Hamlet, and
+his impetuous eloquence, perfectly intelligible.
+The knowledge,&mdash;the unthought of consciousness,&mdash;the
+sensation of human auditors&mdash;of flesh and
+blood sympathists&mdash;acts as a support and a stimulation
+<hi rend='italic'>a tergo</hi>, while the front of the mind, the
+whole consciousness of the speaker, is filled, yea,
+absorbed, by the apparition. Add too, that the
+apparition itself has, by its previous appearances,
+been brought nearer to a thing of this world.
+This accrescence of objectivity in a Ghost that yet
+retains all its ghostly attributes and fearful subjectivity,
+is truly wonderful.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5. Hamlet's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">O all you host of heaven! O earth! What else?</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And shall I couple hell?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I remember nothing equal to this burst, unless
+it be the first speech of Prometheus in the Greek
+drama, after the exit of Vulcan and the two
+Afrites. But Shakespeare alone could have produced
+the vow of Hamlet to make his memory a
+blank of all maxims and generalised truths, that
+<pb n='217'/><anchor id='Pg217'/>
+<q>observation had copied there,</q>&mdash;followed immediately
+by the speaker noting down the generalised
+fact,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Mar.</hi> Hillo, ho, ho, my lord!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Hillo, ho, ho, boy!
+come bird, come,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This part of the scene, after Hamlet's interview
+with the Ghost, has been charged with an improbable
+eccentricity. But the truth is, that after the
+mind has been stretched beyond its usual pitch
+and tone, it must either sink into exhaustion and
+inanity, or seek relief by change. It is thus well
+known, that persons conversant in deeds of cruelty
+contrive to escape from conscience by connecting
+something of the ludicrous with them, and by inventing
+grotesque terms, and a certain technical
+phraseology, to disguise the horror of their practices.
+Indeed, paradoxical as it may appear, the
+terrible by a law of the human mind always
+touches on the verge of the ludicrous. Both arise
+from the perception of something out of the
+common order of things&mdash;something, in fact, out
+of its place; and if from this we can abstract
+danger, the uncommonness will alone remain, and
+the sense of the ridiculous be excited. The close
+alliance of these opposites&mdash;they are not contraries&mdash;appears
+from the circumstance, that laughter is
+equally the expression of extreme anguish and
+horror as of joy: as there are tears of sorrow and
+tears of joy, so is there a laugh of terror and a
+laugh of merriment. These complex causes will
+naturally have produced in Hamlet the disposition
+to escape from his own feelings of the overwhelming
+and supernatural by a wild transition
+<pb n='218'/><anchor id='Pg218'/>
+to the ludicrous,&mdash;a sort of cunning bravado,
+bordering on the flights of delirium. For you
+may, perhaps, observe that Hamlet's wildness is
+but half false; he plays that subtle trick of pretending
+to act only when he is very near really
+being what he acts.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The subterraneous speeches of the Ghost are
+hardly defensible;&mdash;but I would call your attention
+to the characteristic difference between this Ghost,
+as a superstition connected with the most mysterious
+truths of revealed religion,&mdash;and Shakespeare's
+consequent reverence in his treatment of
+it,&mdash;and the foul earthly witcheries and wild
+language in <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Polonius and Reynaldo.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In all things dependent on, or rather made up
+of, fine address, the manner is no more or otherwise
+rememberable than the light notions, steps, and
+gestures of youth and health. But this is almost
+everything:&mdash;no wonder, therefore, if that which
+can be put down by rule in the memory should
+appear to us as mere poring, maudlin, cunning,&mdash;slyness
+blinking through the watery eye of superannuation.
+So in this admirable scene, Polonius,
+who is throughout the skeleton of his own former
+skill and statecraft, hunts the trail of policy at a
+dead scent, supplied by the weak fever-smell in his
+own nostrils.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Speech of Polonius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>My liege, and madam, to expostulate,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's note.
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Then as to the jingles, and play on words, let us but look into
+the sermons of Dr. Donne (the wittiest man of that age), and we
+shall find them full of this vein.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+I have, and that most carefully, read Dr. Donne's
+<pb n='219'/><anchor id='Pg219'/>
+sermons, and find none of these jingles. The great
+art of an orator&mdash;to make whatever he talks of
+appear of importance&mdash;this, indeed, Donne has
+effected with consummate skill.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Excellent well;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">You are a fishmonger.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+That is, you are sent to fish out this secret. This
+is Hamlet's own meaning.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> For if the sun breed maggots in
+a dead dog,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Being a god, kissing carrion.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+These purposely obscure lines, I rather think, refer
+to some thought in Hamlet's mind, contrasting the
+lovely daughter with such a tedious old fool, her
+father, as he, Hamlet, represents Polonius to himself:&mdash;<q>Why,
+fool as he is, he is some degrees in
+rank above a dead dog's carcase; and if the sun,
+being a god that kisses carrion, can raise life out of
+a dead dog,&mdash;why may not good fortune, that
+favours fools, have raised a lovely girl out of this
+dead-alive old fool?</q> Warburton is often led
+astray, in his interpretations, by his attention to
+general positions without the due Shakespearian
+reference to what is probably passing in the mind
+of his speaker, characteristic, and expository of his
+particular character and present mood. The subsequent
+passage,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O Jephthah, judge of Israel! what a treasure hadst thou!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+is confirmatory of my view of these lines.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> You cannot, Sir, take from me any thing
+that I will</q></l>
+<l>more willingly part withal; except my life, except my life, except</l>
+<l><q rend="post">my life.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This repetition strikes me as most admirable.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='220'/><anchor id='Pg220'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Then are our beggars, bodies;
+and our monarchs, and</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">out-stretched heroes, the beggars' shadows?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I do not understand this; and Shakespeare seems
+to have intended the meaning not to be more than
+snatched at:&mdash;<q>By my fay, I cannot reason!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>The rugged Pyrrhus&mdash;he whose sable arms,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This admirable substitution of the epic for the
+dramatic, giving such a reality to the impassioned
+dramatic diction of Shakespeare's own dialogue,
+and authorised too, by the actual style of the
+tragedies before his time (<hi rend='italic'>Porrex and Ferrex</hi>,
+<hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi>, &amp;c.)&mdash;is well worthy of notice. The
+fancy, that a burlesque was intended, sinks below
+criticism: the lines, as epic narrative, are superb.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the thoughts, and even in the separate parts
+of the diction, this description is highly poetical:
+in truth, taken by itself, that is its fault that it is
+too poetical!&mdash;the language of lyric vehemence and
+epic pomp, and not of the drama. But if Shakespeare
+had made the diction truly dramatic, where
+would have been the contrast between Hamlet and
+the play in <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q>Had seen the <emph>mobled</emph> queen,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+A mob-cap is still a word in common use for a
+morning cap, which conceals the whole head of
+hair, and passes under the chin. It is nearly the
+same as the night-cap, that is, it is an imitation of
+it, so as to answer the purpose (<q>I am not drest
+for company</q>), and yet reconciling it with neatness
+and perfect purity.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Hamlet's soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='221'/><anchor id='Pg221'/>
+
+<p>
+This is Shakespeare's own attestation to the truth
+of the idea of Hamlet which I have before put forth.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The spirit that I have seen,</q></l>
+<l>May be a devil: and the devil hath power</l>
+<l>To assume a pleasing shape; yea, and, perhaps</l>
+<l>Out of my weakness, and my melancholy</l>
+<l>(As he is very potent with such spirits),</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Abuses me to damn me.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+See Sir Thomas Brown:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>I believe ... that those apparitions and ghosts of departed
+persons are not the wandering souls of men, but the unquiet walks
+of devils, prompting and suggesting us unto mischief, blood, and
+villany, instilling and stealing into our hearts, that the blessed
+spirits are not at rest in their graves, but wander solicitous of the
+affairs of the world.</q>&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>Relig. Med.</hi> part. i. sect. 37.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1. Hamlet's soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>To be, or not to be, that is the question,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This speech is of absolutely universal interest,&mdash;and
+yet to which of all Shakespeare's characters
+could it have been appropriately given but to
+Hamlet? For Jaques it would have been too
+deep, and for Iago too habitual a communion with
+the heart; which in every man belongs, or ought
+to belong, to all mankind.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The undiscover'd country, from whose bourn</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">No traveller returns.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald's note in defence of the supposed contradiction
+of this in the apparition of the Ghost.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+O miserable defender! If it be necessary to
+remove the apparent contradiction,&mdash;if it be not
+rather a great beauty,&mdash;surely, it were easy to say,
+that no traveller returns to this world, as to his
+home, or abiding-place.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Ha, ha! are you honest?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Oph.</hi> My lord?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Are you fair?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='222'/><anchor id='Pg222'/>
+
+<p>
+Here it is evident that the penetrating Hamlet
+perceives, from the strange and forced manner of
+Ophelia, that the sweet girl was not acting a part
+of her own, but was a decoy; and his after speeches
+are not so much directed to her as to the listeners
+and spies. Such a discovery in a mood so anxious
+and irritable accounts for a certain harshness in
+him;&mdash;and yet a wild up-working of love, sporting
+with opposites in a wilful self-tormenting strain of
+irony, is perceptible throughout. <q>I did love you
+once:</q>&mdash;<q>I lov'd you not:</q>&mdash;and particularly in
+his enumeration of the faults of the sex from which
+Ophelia is so free, that the mere freedom therefrom
+constitutes her character. Note Shakespeare's
+charm of composing the female character by the
+absence of characters, that is, marks and out-juttings.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Hamlet's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>I say, we will have no more marriages: those that are married
+already, all but one, shall live: the rest shall keep as they are.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Observe this dallying with the inward purpose,
+characteristic of one who had not brought his mind
+to the steady acting point. He would fain sting
+the uncle's mind;&mdash;but to stab his body!&mdash;The
+soliloquy of Ophelia, which follows, is the perfection
+of love&mdash;so exquisitely unselfish!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. This dialogue of Hamlet with the
+players is one of the happiest instances of Shakespeare's
+power of diversifying the scene while he
+is carrying on the plot.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> My lord, you played once i' the university,
+you say?</q></l>
+<l>(<hi rend='italic'>To Polonius.</hi>)</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+To have kept Hamlet's love for Ophelia before the
+audience in any direct form, would have made a
+<pb n='223'/><anchor id='Pg223'/>
+breach in the unity of the interest;&mdash;but yet to
+the thoughtful reader it is suggested by his spite
+to poor Polonius, whom he cannot let rest.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> The style of the interlude here is distinguished
+from the real dialogue by rhyme, as in
+the first interview with the players by epic verse.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> My lord, you once did love me.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> <emph>So</emph> I do still, by these
+pickers and stealers.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I never heard an actor give this word <q>so</q> its
+proper emphasis. Shakespeare's meaning is&mdash;<q>lov'd
+you? Hum!&mdash;<emph>so</emph> I do still,</q> &amp;c. There
+has been no change in my opinion:&mdash;I think as ill
+of you as I did. Else Hamlet tells an ignoble
+falsehood, and a useless one, as the last speech to
+Guildenstern&mdash;<q>Why look you now,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;proves.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Hamlet's soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 4"><q rend="pre">Now could I drink hot blood,</q></l>
+<l>And do such business as the bitter day</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Would quake to look on.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The utmost at which Hamlet arrives, is a disposition,
+a mood, to do something:&mdash;but what to do,
+is still left undecided, while every word he utters
+tends to betray his disguise. Yet observe how
+perfectly equal to any call of the moment is Hamlet,
+let it only not be for the future.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Speech of Polonius. Polonius's volunteer
+obtrusion of himself into this business, while
+it is appropriate to his character, still itching after
+former importance, removes all likelihood that
+Hamlet should suspect his presence, and prevents
+us from making his death injure Hamlet in our
+opinion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> The king's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O, my offence is rank, it smells to heaven,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='224'/><anchor id='Pg224'/>
+
+<p>
+This speech well marks the difference between
+crime and guilt of habit. The conscience here is
+still admitted to audience. Nay, even as an audible
+soliloquy, it is far less improbable than is supposed
+by such as have watched men only in the beaten
+road of their feelings. But the final&mdash;<q>all may
+be well!</q> is remarkable;&mdash;the degree of merit
+attributed by the self-flattering soul to its own
+struggle, though baffled, and to the indefinite half-promise,
+half-command, to persevere in religious
+duties. The solution is in the divine <emph>medium</emph> of the
+Christian doctrine of expiation:&mdash;not what you
+have done, but what you are, must determine.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Hamlet's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Now might I do it, pat, now he is praying:</q></l>
+<l>And now I'll do't:&mdash;And so he goes to heaven:</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And so am I revenged? That would be scann'd,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Dr. Johnson's mistaking of the marks of reluctance
+and procrastination for impetuous, horror-striking,
+fiendishness!&mdash;Of such importance is it to understand
+the germ of a character. But the interval
+taken by Hamlet's speech is truly awful! And
+then&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">My words fly up, my thoughts remain below:</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Words, without thoughts, never to heaven go.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+O what a lesson concerning the essential difference
+between wishing and willing, and the folly of
+all motive-mongering, while the individual self
+remains!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> A bloody deed;&mdash;almost as bad,
+good mother,</q></l>
+<l>As kill a king, and marry with his brother.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Queen.</hi> As kill a king?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I confess that Shakespeare has left the character
+of the Queen in an unpleasant perplexity. Was
+she, or was she not, conscious of the fratricide?
+</p>
+
+<pb n='225'/><anchor id='Pg225'/>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ros.</hi> Take you me for a spunge, my lord?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Ham.</hi> Ay, Sir; that soaks up the King's countenance, his</l>
+<l><q rend="post">rewards, his authorities,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Hamlet's madness is made to consist in the free
+utterance of all the thoughts that had passed
+through his mind before;&mdash;in fact, in telling
+home-truths.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 5. Ophelia's singing. O, note the
+conjunction here of these two thoughts that had
+never subsisted in disjunction, the love for Hamlet,
+and her filial love, with the guileless floating on the
+surface of her pure imagination of the cautions so
+lately expressed, and the fears not too delicately
+avowed, by her father and brother, concerning the
+dangers to which her honour lay exposed. Thought,
+affliction, passion, murder itself&mdash;she turns to favour
+and prettiness. This play of association is instanced
+in the close:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>My brother shall know of it, and I thank you for your good
+counsel.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Gentleman's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And as the world were now but to begin</q></l>
+<l>Antiquity forgot, custom not known,</l>
+<l>The ratifiers and props of every word&mdash;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">They cry,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Fearful and self-suspicious as I always feel, when
+I seem to see an error of judgment in Shakespeare,
+yet I cannot reconcile the cool, and, as Warburton
+calls it, <q>rational and consequential,</q> reflection in
+these lines with the anonymousness, or the alarm,
+of this Gentleman or Messenger, as he is called in
+other editions.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> King's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">There's such divinity doth hedge a king,</q></l>
+<l>That treason can but peep to what it would,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Acts little of his will.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='226'/><anchor id='Pg226'/>
+
+<p>
+Proof, as indeed all else is, that Shakespeare
+never intended us to see the King with Hamlet's
+eyes; though, I suspect, the managers have long
+done so.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Laertes:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>To hell, allegiance! vows, to the blackest devil!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Laertes is a <emph>good</emph> character, but,</q>
+&amp;c.&mdash;<hi rend='smallcaps'>Warburton.</hi>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Mercy on Warburton's notion of goodness!
+Please to refer to the seventh scene of this act;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I will do't;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And for that purpose I'll anoint my sword,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+uttered by Laertes after the King's description of
+Hamlet;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">He being remiss,</q></l>
+<l>Most generous, and free from all contriving,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Will not peruse the foils.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Yet I acknowledge that Shakespeare evidently
+wishes, as much as possible, to spare the character
+of Laertes,&mdash;to break the extreme turpitude of his
+consent to become an agent and accomplice of the
+King's treachery;&mdash;and to this end he re-introduces
+Ophelia at the close of this scene to afford a
+probable stimulus of passion in her brother.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6. Hamlet's capture by the pirates.
+This is almost the only play of Shakespeare, in
+which mere accidents, independent of all will, form
+an essential part of the plot;&mdash;but here how
+judiciously in keeping with the character of the
+over-meditative Hamlet, ever at last determined
+by accident or by a fit of passion!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 7. Note how the King first awakens
+Laertes's vanity by praising the reporter, and then
+gratifies it by the report itself, and finally points it
+by&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Sir, this report of his</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Did Hamlet so envenom with his envy!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='227'/><anchor id='Pg227'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> King's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">For goodness, growing to a <emph>pleurisy</emph>,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Dies in his own too much.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald's note from Warburton, who conjectures
+<q>plethory.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I rather think that Shakespeare meant <q>pleurisy,</q>
+but involved in it the thought of <emph>plethora</emph>, as
+supposing pleurisy to arise from too much blood;
+otherwise I cannot explain the following line&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And then this <emph>should</emph> is like a spendthrift sigh,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That hurts by easing.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In a stitch in the side every one must have heaved
+a sigh that <q>hurt by easing.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Since writing the above I feel confirmed that
+<q>pleurisy</q> is the right word; for I find that in
+the old medical dictionaries the pleurisy is often
+called the <q>plethory.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Queen.</hi> Your sister's drown'd, Laertes.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Laer.</hi> Drown'd! O, where?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+That Laertes might be excused in some degree for
+not cooling, the Act concludes with the affecting
+death of Ophelia,&mdash;who in the beginning lay like
+a little projection of land into a lake or stream,
+covered with spray-flowers, quietly reflected in
+the quiet waters, but at length is undermined or
+loosened, and becomes a faery isle, and after a brief
+vagrancy sinks almost without an eddy!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 1. O, the rich contrast between the
+Clowns and Hamlet, as two extremes! You see in
+the former the mockery of logic, and a traditional
+wit valued, like truth, for its antiquity, and
+treasured up, like a tune, for use.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 1 and 2. Shakespeare seems to mean all
+Hamlet's character to be brought together before
+<pb n='228'/><anchor id='Pg228'/>
+his final disappearance from the scene;&mdash;his meditative
+excess in the grave-digging, his yielding to
+passion with Laertes, his love for Ophelia blazing
+out, his tendency to generalise on all occasions in
+the dialogue with Horatio, his fine gentlemanly
+manners with Osrick, and his and Shakespeare's
+own fondness for presentment:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>But thou wouldst not think, how ill all's here about my heart:
+but it is no matter.</q>
+</quote>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='229'/><anchor id='Pg229'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Macbeth.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+<q>Macbeth</q> stands in contrast throughout
+with <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>; in the manner of opening
+more especially. In the latter, there is a gradual
+ascent from the simplest forms of conversation to
+the language of impassioned intellect,&mdash;yet the
+intellect still remaining the seat of passion: in
+the former, the invocation is at once made to the
+imagination and the emotions connected therewith.
+Hence the movement throughout is the
+most rapid of all Shakespeare's plays; and hence
+also, with the exception of the disgusting passage
+of the Porter (Act ii. sc. 3), which I dare pledge
+myself to demonstrate to be an interpolation of
+the actors, there is not, to the best of my remembrance,
+a single pun or play on words in the whole
+drama. I have previously given an answer to the
+thousand times repeated charge against Shakespeare
+upon the subject of his punning, and I here
+merely mention the fact of the absence of any
+puns in <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>, as justifying a candid doubt, at
+least, whether even in these figures of speech and
+fanciful modifications of language, Shakespeare
+may not have followed rules and principles that
+merit and would stand the test of philosophic
+examination. And hence, also, there is an entire
+absence of comedy, nay, even of irony and philosophic
+contemplation in <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>,&mdash;the play being
+wholly and purely tragic. For the same cause,
+<pb n='230'/><anchor id='Pg230'/>
+there are no reasonings of equivocal morality,
+which would have required a more leisurely state
+and a consequently greater activity of mind;&mdash;no
+sophistry of self-delusion,&mdash;except only that previously
+to the dreadful act, Macbeth mistranslates
+the recoilings and ominous whispers of conscience
+into prudential and selfish reasonings; and, after
+the deed done, the terrors of remorse into fear
+from external dangers,&mdash;like delirious men who
+run away from the phantoms of their own brains,
+or, raised by terror to rage, stab the real object
+that is within their reach:&mdash;whilst Lady Macbeth
+merely endeavours to reconcile his and her own
+sinkings of heart by anticipations of the worst,
+and an affected bravado in confronting them. In
+all the rest, Macbeth's language is the grave
+utterance of the very heart, conscience-sick, even
+to the last faintings of moral death. It is the
+same in all the other characters. The variety
+arises from rage, caused ever and anon by disruption
+of anxious thought, and the quick transition
+of fear into it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi> and <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi> the scene opens with
+superstition; but, in each it is not merely different,
+but opposite. In the first it is connected with the
+best and holiest feelings; in the second with the
+shadowy, turbulent, and unsanctified cravings of
+the individual will. Nor is the purpose the same;
+in the one the object is to excite, whilst in the
+other it is to mark a mind already excited.
+Superstition, of one sort or another, is natural
+to victorious generals; the instances are too
+notorious to need mentioning. There is so much
+of chance in warfare, and such vast events are
+connected with the acts of a single individual,&mdash;the
+<pb n='231'/><anchor id='Pg231'/>
+representative, in truth, of the efforts of
+myriads, and yet to the public, and doubtless to
+his own feelings, the aggregate of all,&mdash;that the
+proper temperament for generating or receiving
+superstitious impressions is naturally produced.
+Hope, the master element of a commanding genius,
+meeting with an active and combining intellect,
+and an imagination of just that degree of vividness
+which disquiets and impels the soul to try to
+realise its images, greatly increases the creative
+power of the mind; and hence the images become
+a satisfying world of themselves, as is the case in
+every poet and original philosopher:&mdash;but hope
+fully gratified, and yet the elementary basis of the
+passion remaining, becomes fear; and, indeed, the
+general, who must often feel, even though he may
+hide it from his own consciousness, how large a
+share chance had in his successes, may very naturally
+be irresolute in a new scene, where he knows
+that all will depend on his own act and election.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The Weird Sisters are as true a creation of
+Shakespeare's, as his Ariel and Caliban,&mdash;fates,
+furies, and materialising witches being the elements.
+They are wholly different from any representation
+of witches in the contemporary
+writers, and yet presented a sufficient external resemblance
+to the creatures of vulgar prejudice to
+act immediately on the audience. Their character
+consists in the imaginative disconnected from the
+good; they are the shadowy obscure and fearfully
+anomalous of physical nature, the lawless of
+human nature,&mdash;elemental avengers without sex
+or kin:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Fair is foul, and foul is fair;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Hover through the fog and filthy air.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='232'/><anchor id='Pg232'/>
+
+<p>
+How much it were to be wished in playing <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>,
+that an attempt should be made to introduce
+the flexile character-mask of the ancient pantomime;&mdash;that
+Flaxman would contribute his genius
+to the embodying and making sensuously perceptible
+that of Shakespeare!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The style and rhythm of the Captain's speeches
+in the second scene should be illustrated by reference
+to the interlude in <hi rend='italic'>Hamlet</hi>, in which the epic
+is substituted for the tragic, in order to make the
+latter be felt as the real-life diction. In <hi rend='italic'>Macbeth</hi>
+the poet's object was to raise the mind at once to
+the high tragic tone, that the audience might be
+ready for the precipitate consummation of guilt in
+the early part of the play. The true reason for
+the first appearance of the Witches is to strike
+the key-note of the character of the whole drama,
+as is proved by their re-appearance in the third
+scene, after such an order of the king's as establishes
+their supernatural power of information. I
+say information,&mdash;for so it only is as to Glamis
+and Cawdor; the <q>king hereafter</q> was still contingent,&mdash;still
+in Macbeth's moral will; although,
+if he should yield to the temptation, and thus
+forfeit his free agency, the link of cause and effect
+<hi rend='italic'>more physico</hi> would then commence. I need not
+say, that the general idea is all that can be required
+from the poet,&mdash;not a scholastic logical
+consistency in all the parts so as to meet metaphysical
+objectors. But O! how truly Shakespearian
+is the opening of Macbeth's character
+given in the <emph>unpossessedness</emph> of Banquo's mind,
+wholly present to the present object,&mdash;an unsullied,
+unscarified mirror! And how strictly
+true to nature it is that Banquo, and not Macbeth
+<pb n='233'/><anchor id='Pg233'/>
+himself, directs our notice to the effect produced
+on Macbeth's mind, rendered temptible by previous
+dalliance of the fancy with ambitious
+thoughts:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Good Sir, why do you start; and seem to fear</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Things that do sound so fair?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+And then, again, still unintroitive, addresses the
+Witches:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 6">... <q rend="pre">I' the name of truth,</q></l>
+<l>Are ye fantastical, or that indeed</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Which outwardly ye show?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Banquo's questions are those of natural curiosity,&mdash;such
+as a girl would put after hearing a gipsy
+tell her schoolfellow's fortune;&mdash;all perfectly
+general, or rather, planless. But Macbeth, lost
+in thought, raises himself to speech only by the
+Witches being about to depart:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and all that follows is reasoning on a problem
+already discussed in his mind,&mdash;on a hope which
+he welcomes, and the doubts concerning the
+attainment of which he wishes to have cleared up.
+Compare his eagerness,&mdash;the keen eye with which
+he has pursued the Witches' evanishing&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Speak, I charge you!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+with the easily satisfied mind of the self-uninterested
+Banquo:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The air hath bubbles, as the water has,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And these are of them:&mdash;Whither are they vanish'd?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and then Macbeth's earnest reply,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Into the air; and what seem'd corporal, melted</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">As breath into the wind.&mdash;<emph>Would they had
+stay'd!</emph></q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Is it too minute to notice the appropriateness of
+the simile <q>as breath,</q> &amp;c., in a cold climate?
+</p>
+
+<pb n='234'/><anchor id='Pg234'/>
+
+<p>
+Still again Banquo goes on wondering like any
+common spectator,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Were such things here as we do speak about?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+whilst Macbeth persists in recurring to the self-concerning:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Your children shall be kings.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Ban.</hi> You shall be king.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Macb.</hi> And thane of Cawdor too: went it
+not so?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+So surely is the guilt in its germ anterior to the
+supposed cause, and immediate temptation! Before
+he can cool, the confirmation of the tempting half
+of the prophecy arrives, and the concatenating
+tendency of the imagination is fostered by the
+sudden coincidence:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Glamis, and thane of Cawdor:</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">The greatest is behind.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Oppose this to Banquo's simple surprise:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>What, can the devil speak true?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Banquo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">That, trusted home,</q></l>
+<l>Might yet enkindle you unto the crown,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Besides the thane of Cawdor.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I doubt whether <q>enkindle</q> has not another
+sense than that of <q>stimulating;</q> I mean of
+<q>kind</q> and <q>kin,</q> as when rabbits are said to
+<q>kindle.</q> However, Macbeth no longer hears
+anything <hi rend='italic'>ab extra</hi>:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Two truths are told,</q></l>
+<l>As happy prologues to the swelling act</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of the imperial theme.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Then in the necessity of recollecting himself,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I thank you, gentlemen.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Then he relapses into himself again, and every
+word of his soliloquy shows the early birth-date of
+his guilt. He is all-powerful without strength;
+<pb n='235'/><anchor id='Pg235'/>
+he wishes the end, but is irresolute as to the
+means; conscience distinctly warns him, and he
+lulls it imperfectly:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Without my stir.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Lost in the prospective of his guilt, he turns round
+alarmed lest others may suspect what is passing
+in his own mind, and instantly vents the lie of
+ambition:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">My dull brain was wrought</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">With things <emph>forgotten</emph>;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and immediately after pours forth the promising
+courtesies of a usurper in intention:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 8">... <q rend="pre">Kind gentlemen, your pains</q></l>
+<l>Are register'd where every day I turn</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The leaf to read them.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Macbeth's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Present <emph>fears</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Are less than horrible imaginings.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's note, and substitution of <q>feats</q> for
+<q>fears.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Mercy on this most wilful ingenuity of blundering,
+which, nevertheless, was the very Warburton
+of Warburton&mdash;his inmost being! <q>Fears,</q>
+here, are present fear-striking objects, <hi rend='italic'>terribilia
+adstantia</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. O! the affecting beauty of the death
+of Cawdor, and the presentimental speech of the
+king:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">There's no art</q></l>
+<l>To find the mind's construction in the face:</l>
+<l>He was a gentleman on whom I built</l>
+<l><q rend="post">An absolute trust.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Interrupted by&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O worthiest cousin!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+on the entrance of the deeper traitor for whom
+<pb n='236'/><anchor id='Pg236'/>
+Cawdor had made way! And here in contrast with
+Duncan's <q>plenteous joys,</q> Macbeth has nothing
+but the common-places of loyalty, in which he hides
+himself with <q>our duties.</q> Note the exceeding
+effort of Macbeth's addresses to the king, his
+reasoning on his allegiance, and then especially
+when a new difficulty, the designation of a successor,
+suggests a new crime. This, however, seems
+the first distinct notion, as to the plan of realising
+his wishes; and here, therefore, with great propriety,
+Macbeth's cowardice of his own conscience
+discloses itself. I always think there is something
+especially Shakespearian in Duncan's speeches
+throughout this scene, such pourings forth, such
+abandonments, compared with the language of
+vulgar dramatists, whose characters seem to have
+made their speeches as the actors learn them.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib:</hi> Duncan's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Sons, kinsmen, thanes,</q></l>
+<l>And you whose places are the nearest, know,</l>
+<l>We will establish our estate upon</l>
+<l>Our eldest Malcolm, whom we name hereafter</l>
+<l>The Prince of Cumberland: which honour must</l>
+<l>Not unaccompanied, invest him only;</l>
+<l>But signs of nobleness, like stars, shall shine</l>
+<l><q rend="post">On all deservers.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It is a fancy;&mdash;but I can never read this and
+the following speeches of Macbeth, without involuntarily
+thinking of the Miltonic Messiah and
+Satan.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5. Macbeth is described by Lady Macbeth
+so as at the same time to reveal her own
+character. Could he have every thing he wanted,
+he would rather have it innocently;&mdash;ignorant, as
+alas! how many of us are, that he who wishes a
+temporal end for itself, does in truth will the
+means; and hence the danger of indulging fancies.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='237'/><anchor id='Pg237'/>
+
+<p>
+Lady Macbeth, like all in Shakespeare, is a class
+individualised:&mdash;of high rank, left much alone,
+and feeding herself with day-dreams of ambition,
+she mistakes the courage of fantasy for the power
+of bearing the consequences of the realities of guilt.
+His is the mock fortitude of a mind deluded by
+ambition; she shames her husband with a superhuman
+audacity of fancy which she cannot support,
+but sinks in the season of remorse, and dies in
+suicidal agony. Her speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Come, you spirits</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+is that of one who had habitually familiarised her
+imagination to dreadful conceptions, and was trying
+to do so still more. Her invocations and
+requisitions are all the false efforts of a mind
+accustomed only hitherto to the shadows of the
+imagination, vivid enough to throw the every-day
+substances of life into shadow, but never as yet
+brought into direct contact with their own correspondent
+realities. She evinces no womanly life,
+no wifely joy, at the return of her husband, no
+pleased terror at the thought of his past dangers,
+whilst Macbeth bursts forth naturally&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>My dearest love</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and shrinks from the boldness with which she presents
+his own thoughts to him. With consummate
+art she at first uses as incentives the very circumstances,
+Duncan's coming to their house, &amp;c., which
+Macbeth's conscience would most probably have
+adduced to her as motives of abhorrence or repulsion.
+Yet Macbeth is not prepared:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>We will speak further.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6. The lyrical movement with which this
+<pb n='238'/><anchor id='Pg238'/>
+scene opens, and the free and unengaged mind of
+Banquo, loving nature, and rewarded in the love
+itself, form a highly dramatic contrast with the
+laboured rhythm and hypocritical over-much of
+Lady Macbeth's welcome, in which you cannot
+detect a ray of personal feeling, but all is thrown
+upon the <q>dignities,</q> the general duty.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 7. Macbeth's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">We will proceed no further in this business:</q></l>
+<l>He hath honour'd me of late; and I have bought</l>
+<l>Golden opinions from all sorts of people,</l>
+<l>Which would be worn now in their newest gloss,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Not cast aside so soon.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Note the inward pangs and warnings of conscience
+interpreted into prudential reasonings.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Banquo's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">A heavy summons lies like lead upon me,</q></l>
+<l>And yet I would not sleep. Merciful powers!</l>
+<l>Restrain in me the cursed thoughts, that nature</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Gives way to in repose.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The disturbance of an innocent soul by painful
+suspicions of another's guilty intentions and wishes,
+and fear of the cursed thoughts of sensual nature.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Now that the deed is done or doing&mdash;now
+that the first reality commences, Lady Macbeth
+shrinks. The most simple sound strikes
+terror, the most natural consequences are horrible,
+whilst previously every thing, however awful,
+appeared a mere trifle; conscience, which before
+had been hidden to Macbeth in selfish and prudential
+fears, now rushes in upon him in her own
+veritable person:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Methought I heard a voice cry&mdash;Sleep no more!</q></l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">I could not say Amen,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">When they did say, God bless us!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+And see the novelty given to the most familiar
+images by a new state of feeling.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='239'/><anchor id='Pg239'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. This low soliloquy of the Porter and
+his few speeches afterwards, I believe to have been
+written for the mob by some other hand, perhaps
+with Shakespeare's consent; and that finding it
+take, he with the remaining ink of a pen otherwise
+employed, just interpolated the words&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>I'll devil-porter it no further: I had thought to have let in
+some of all professions, that go the primrose way to the everlasting
+bonfire.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Of the rest not one syllable has the ever-present
+being of Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1. Compare Macbeth's mode of working
+on the murderers in this place with Schiller's
+mistaken scene between Butler, Devereux, and
+Macdonald in <hi rend='italic'>Wallenstein</hi>.&mdash;(Part II. act iv. sc. 2.)
+The comic was wholly out of season. Shakespeare
+never introduces it, but when it may react on the
+tragedy by harmonious contrast.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. Macbeth's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">But let the frame of things disjoint, both the worlds suffer,</q></l>
+<l>Ere we will eat our meal in fear, and sleep</l>
+<l>In the affliction of these terrible dreams</l>
+<l><q rend="post">That shake us nightly.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Ever and ever mistaking the anguish of conscience
+for fears of selfishness, and thus as a punishment
+of that selfishness, plunging still deeper in
+guilt and ruin.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Macbeth's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Be innocent of the knowledge, dearest chuck,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Till thou applaud the deed.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is Macbeth's sympathy with his own feelings,
+and his mistaking his wife's opposite state.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Macb.</hi> It will have blood; they say,
+blood will have blood:</q></l>
+<l>Stones have been known to move, and trees to speak;</l>
+<l>Augurs, and understood relations, have</l>
+<l>By magot-pies, and choughs, and rooks, brought forth</l>
+<l><q rend="post">The secret'st man of blood.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='240'/><anchor id='Pg240'/>
+
+<p>
+The deed is done; but Macbeth receives no
+comfort, no additional security. He has by guilt
+torn himself live-asunder from nature, and is,
+therefore, himself in a preternatural state: no
+wonder, then, that he is inclined to superstition,
+and faith in the unknown of signs and tokens, and
+super-human agencies.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Len.</hi> 'Tis two or three, my lord, that
+bring you word</q></l>
+<l>Macduff is fled to England.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Macb.</hi> Fled to England!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The acme of the avenging conscience.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2. This scene, dreadful as it is, is still a
+relief, because a variety, because domestic, and
+therefore soothing, as associated with the only real
+pleasures of life. The conversation between Lady
+Macduff and her child heightens the pathos, and is
+preparatory for the deep tragedy of their assassination.
+Shakespeare's fondness for children is everywhere
+shown;&mdash;in Prince Arthur, in <hi rend='italic'>King John</hi>;
+in the sweet scene in the <hi rend='italic'>Winter's Tale</hi> between
+Hermione and her son; nay, even in honest
+Evans's examination of Mrs. Page's schoolboy.
+To the objection that Shakespeare wounds the
+moral sense by the unsubdued, undisguised
+description of the most hateful atrocity&mdash;that he
+tears the feelings without mercy, and even outrages
+the eye itself with scenes of insupportable
+horror&mdash;I, omitting <hi rend='italic'>Titus Andronicus</hi>, as not
+genuine, and excepting the scene of Gloster's
+blinding in <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, answer boldly in the name of
+Shakespeare, not guilty.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Malcolm's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 9">... <q rend="pre">Better Macbeth,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Than such an one to reign.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='241'/><anchor id='Pg241'/>
+
+<p>
+The moral is&mdash;the dreadful effects even on the
+best minds of the soul-sickening sense of insecurity.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> How admirably Macduff's grief is in harmony
+with the whole play! It rends, not dissolves,
+the heart. <q>The tune of it goes manly.</q> Thus
+is Shakespeare always master of himself and of his
+subject,&mdash;a genuine Proteus:&mdash;we see all things in
+him, as images in a calm lake, most distinct, most
+accurate,&mdash;only more splendid, more glorified.
+This is correctness in the only philosophical sense.
+But he requires your sympathy and your submission;
+you must have that recipiency of moral
+impression without which the purposes and ends
+of the drama would be frustrated, and the absence
+of which demonstrates an utter want of all imagination,
+a deadness to that necessary pleasure of
+being innocently&mdash;shall I say, deluded?&mdash;or
+rather, drawn away from ourselves to the music of
+noblest thought in harmonious sounds. Happy
+he, who not only in the public theatre, but in the
+labours of a profession, and round the light of his
+own hearth, still carries a heart so pleasure-fraught!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Alas for Macbeth! now all is inward with him;
+he has no more prudential prospective reasonings.
+His wife, the only being who could have had any
+seat in his affections, dies; he puts on despondency,
+the final heart-armour of the wretched, and would
+fain think every thing shadowy and unsubstantial,
+as indeed all things are to those who cannot regard
+them as symbols of goodness:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10"><q rend="pre">Out, out, brief candle!</q></l>
+<l>Life's but a walking shadow; a poor player,</l>
+<l>That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,</l>
+<l>And then is heard no more; it is a tale</l>
+<l>Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Signifying nothing.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='243'/><anchor id='Pg243'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Winter's Tale.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Although, on the whole, this play is exquisitely
+respondent to its title, and even in the
+fault I am about to mention, still a winter's tale;
+yet it seems a mere indolence of the great bard not
+to have provided in the oracular response (Act ii.
+sc. 2.) some ground for Hermione's seeming death
+and fifteen years' voluntary concealment. This
+might have been easily effected by some obscure
+sentence of the oracle, as for example:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q><q>Nor shall he ever recover an heir, if he have a wife before
+that recovery.</q></q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+The idea of this delightful drama is a genuine
+jealousy of disposition, and it should be immediately
+followed by the perusal of <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>, which
+is the direct contrast of it in every particular.
+For jealousy is a vice of the mind, a culpable
+tendency of the temper, having certain well-known
+and well-defined effects and concomitants, all of
+which are visible in Leontes, and, I boldly say, not
+one of which marks its presence in Othello;&mdash;such
+as, first, an excitability by the most inadequate
+causes, and an eagerness to snatch at proofs;
+secondly, a grossness of conception, and a disposition
+to degrade the object of the passion by sensual
+fancies and images; thirdly, a sense of shame of
+his own feelings exhibited in a solitary moodiness
+of humour, and yet from the violence of the passion
+forced to utter itself, and therefore catching occasions
+<pb n='244'/><anchor id='Pg244'/>
+to ease the mind by ambiguities, equivoques,
+by talking to those who cannot, and who are known
+not to be able to, understand what is said to them,&mdash;in
+short, by soliloquy in the form of dialogue,
+and hence a confused, broken, and fragmentary,
+manner; fourthly, a dread of vulgar ridicule, as
+distinct from a high sense of honour, or a mistaken
+sense of duty; and lastly, and immediately, consequent
+on this, a spirit of selfish vindictiveness.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1, 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Observe the easy style of chitchat between
+Camillo and Archidamus as contrasted with the
+elevated diction on the introduction of the kings
+and Hermione in the second scene: and how
+admirably Polixenes' obstinate refusal to Leontes
+to stay,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">There is no tongue that moves; none, none i' the world</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">So soon as yours, could win me;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+prepares for the effect produced by his afterwards
+yielding to Hermione;&mdash;which is, nevertheless,
+perfectly natural from mere courtesy of sex, and
+the exhaustion of the will by former efforts of
+denial, and well calculated to set in nascent action
+the jealousy of Leontes. This, when once excited,
+is unconsciously increased by Hermione,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Yet, good deed, Leontes,</q></l>
+<l>I love thee not a jar o' the clock behind</l>
+<l><q rend="post">What lady she her lord;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+accompanied, as a good actress ought to represent
+it, by an expression and recoil of apprehension that
+she had gone too far.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>At my request, he would not:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The first working of the jealous fit;&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Too hot, too hot:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='245'/><anchor id='Pg245'/>
+
+<p>
+The morbid tendency of Leontes to lay hold of
+the merest trifles, and his grossness immediately
+afterwards,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Paddling palms and pinching fingers;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+followed by his strange loss of self-control in his
+dialogue with the little boy.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 2. Paulina's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">That thou betray'dst Polixenes, 'twas nothing;</q></l>
+<l>That did but show thee, of a <emph>fool</emph>, inconstant,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And damnable ingrateful.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald reads <q>soul.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I think the original word is Shakespeare's.
+1. My ear feels it to be Shakespearian; 2. The
+involved grammar is Shakespearian&mdash;<q>show thee,
+being a fool naturally, to have improved thy folly
+by inconstancy;</q> 3. The alteration is most flat,
+and un-Shakespearian. As to the grossness of
+the abuse&mdash;she calls him <q>gross and foolish</q> a
+few lines below.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Speech of Autolycus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>For the life to come, I sleep out the thought of it.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Fine as this is, and delicately characteristic of
+one who had lived and been reared in the best
+society, and had been precipitated from it by dice
+and drabbing; yet still it strikes against my feelings
+as a note out of tune, and as not coalescing
+with that pastoral tint which gives such a charm
+to this act. It is too Macbeth-like in the <q>snapper
+up of unconsidered trifles.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. Perdita's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>From Dis's waggon! daffodils.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+An epithet is wanted here, not merely or chiefly
+for the metre, but for the balance, for the æsthetic
+<pb n='246'/><anchor id='Pg246'/>
+logic. Perhaps <q>golden</q> was the word which
+would set off the <q>violets dim.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Pale primroses</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That die unmarried.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Milton's&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>And the rathe primrose that forsaken dies.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Perdita's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Even here undone:</q></l>
+<l>I was not much afraid; for once or twice</l>
+<l>I was about to speak, and tell him plainly,</l>
+<l>The self-same sun, that shines upon his court,</l>
+<l>Hides not his visage from our cottage, but</l>
+<l>Looks on alike. Will't please you, Sir, be gone!</l>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">(<hi rend='italic'>To Florizel.</hi>)</l>
+<l>I told you, what would come of this. Beseech you,</l>
+<l>Of your own state take care: this dream of mine,</l>
+<l>Being now awake, I'll queen it no inch farther,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But milk my ewes, and weep.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+O how more than exquisite is this whole speech!
+And that profound nature of noble pride and grief
+venting themselves in a momentary peevishness of
+resentment toward Florizel:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q>Will't please you, Sir, be gone!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Autolycus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Let me have no lying; it becomes none but tradesmen, and
+they often give us soldiers the lie; but we pay them for it with
+stamped coin, not stabbing steel;&mdash;therefore they do not
+<emph>give</emph> us the lie.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+As we <emph>pay</emph> them, they, therefore, do not <emph>give</emph>
+it us.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='247'/><anchor id='Pg247'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Othello.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Admirable is the preparation, so truly and
+peculiarly Shakespearian, in the introduction
+of Roderigo, as the dupe on whom Iago shall first
+exercise his art, and in so doing display his own
+character. Roderigo, without any fixed principle,
+but not without the moral notions and sympathies
+with honour, which his rank and connections had
+hung upon him, is already well fitted and predisposed
+for the purpose; for very want of character
+and strength of passion, like wind loudest in an
+empty house, constitute his character. The first
+three lines happily state the nature and foundation
+of the friendship between him and Iago,&mdash;the
+purse,&mdash;as also the contrast of Roderigo's intemperance
+of mind with Iago's coolness,&mdash;the coolness
+of a preconceiving experimenter. The mere
+language of protestation,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>If ever I did dream of such a matter, abhor me,</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+which, falling in with the associative link, determines
+Roderigo's continuation of complaint,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Thou told'st me, thou didst hold him in thy hate,</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+elicits at length a true feeling of Iago's mind, the
+dread of contempt habitual to those who encourage
+in themselves, and have their keenest pleasure in,
+the expression of contempt for others. Observe
+Iago's high self-opinion, and the moral, that a
+<pb n='248'/><anchor id='Pg248'/>
+wicked man will employ real feelings, as well as
+assume those most alien from his own, as instruments
+of his purposes:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10"><q rend="pre">And, by the faith of man,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">I know my price, I am worth no worse a place.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I think Tyrwhitt's reading of <q>life</q> for
+<q>wife</q>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>A fellow almost damn'd in a fair <emph>wife</emph></q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+the true one, as fitting to Iago's contempt for
+whatever did not display power, and that intellectual
+power. In what follows, let the reader
+feel how by and through the glass of two passions,
+disappointed vanity and envy, the very vices of
+which he is complaining, are made to act upon
+him as if they were so many excellences, and the
+more appropriately, because cunning is always
+admired and wished for by minds conscious of
+inward weakness;&mdash;but they act only by half,
+like music on an inattentive auditor, swelling the
+thoughts which prevent him from listening to it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Rod.</hi> What a full fortune does the
+<emph>thick-lips</emph> owe,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">If he can carry 't thus.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Roderigo turns off to Othello; and here comes
+one, if not the only, seeming justification of our
+blackamoor or negro Othello. Even if we supposed
+this an uninterrupted tradition of the
+theatre, and that Shakespeare himself, from want
+of scenes, and the experience that nothing could
+be made too marked for the senses of his audience,
+had practically sanctioned it,&mdash;would this prove
+aught concerning his own intention as a poet for
+all ages? Can we imagine him so utterly ignorant
+as to make a barbarous negro plead royal birth,&mdash;at
+a time, too, when negroes were not known
+<pb n='249'/><anchor id='Pg249'/>
+except as slaves? As for Iago's language to
+Brabantio, it implies merely that Othello was a
+Moor,&mdash;that is, black. Though I think the rivalry
+of Roderigo sufficient to account for his wilful
+confusion of Moor and Negro,&mdash;yet, even if compelled
+to give this up, I should think it only
+adapted for the acting of the day, and should
+complain of an enormity built on a single word,
+in direct contradiction to Iago's <q>Barbary horse.</q>
+Besides, if we could in good earnest believe Shakespeare
+ignorant of the distinction, still why should
+we adopt one disagreeable possibility instead of a
+ten times greater and more pleasing probability?
+It is a common error to mistake the epithets
+applied by the <hi rend='italic'>dramatis personæ</hi> to each other, as
+truly descriptive of what the audience ought to
+see or know. No doubt Desdemona saw Othello's
+visage in his mind; yet, as we are constituted,
+and most surely as an English audience was disposed
+in the beginning of the seventeenth century,
+it would be something monstrous to conceive this
+beautiful Venetian girl falling in love with a veritable
+negro. It would argue a disproportionateness,
+a want of balance, in Desdemona, which Shakespeare
+does not appear to have in the least contemplated.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Brabantio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>This accident is not unlike my dream.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The old careful senator, being caught careless,
+transfers his caution to his dreaming power at
+least.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Iago's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">For their souls,</q></l>
+<l>Another of his fathom they have not,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To lead their business.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='250'/><anchor id='Pg250'/>
+
+<p>
+The forced praise of Othello, followed by the
+bitter hatred of him in this speech! And observe
+how Brabantio's dream prepares for his recurrence
+to the notion of philtres, and how both prepare for
+carrying on the plot of the arraignment of Othello
+on this ground.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Oth.</hi> 'Tis better as it is.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+How well these few words impress at the outset
+the truth of Othello's own character of himself at
+the end&mdash;<q>that he was not easily wrought!</q> His
+self-government contradistinguishes him throughout
+from Leontes.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Othello's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">And my demerits</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">May speak, <emph>unbonneted</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The argument in Theobald's note, where <q>and
+bonneted</q> is suggested, goes on the assumption
+that Shakespeare could not use the same word
+differently in different places; whereas I should
+conclude, that as in the passage in <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> the word
+is employed in its direct meaning, so here it is
+used metaphorically; and this is confirmed by
+what has escaped the editors, that it is not <q>I,</q>
+but <q>my demerits</q> that may speak unbonneted,&mdash;without
+the symbol of a petitioning inferior.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Othello's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">So please your grace, my ancient;</q></l>
+<l>A man he is of honesty and trust:</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To his conveyance I assign my wife.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Compare this with the behaviour of Leontes to
+his true friend Camillo.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Bra.</hi> Look to her, Moor; if thou hast
+eyes to see;</q></l>
+<l>She has deceived her father, and may thee.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Oth.</hi> My life upon her faith.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='251'/><anchor id='Pg251'/>
+
+<p>
+In real life, how do we look back to little
+speeches as presentimental of, or contrasted with,
+an affecting event! Even so, Shakespeare, as
+secure of being read over and over, of becoming a
+family friend, provides this passage for his readers,
+and leaves it to them.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Iago's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Virtue? a fig! 'tis in ourselves, that we are thus, or thus,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This speech comprises the passionless character
+of Iago. It is all will in intellect; and therefore
+he is here a bold partizan of a truth, but yet of a
+truth converted into a falsehood by the absence of
+all the necessary modifications caused by the frail
+nature of man. And then comes the last sentiment:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Our raging motions, our carnal stings, our unbitted lusts,
+whereof I take this, that you call&mdash;love, to be a sect or scion!</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Here is the true Iagoism of, alas! how many!
+Note Iago's pride of mastery in the repetition of
+<q>Go, make money!</q> to his anticipated dupe,
+even stronger than his love of lucre: and when
+Roderigo is completely won,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I am chang'd. I'll go sell all my land,</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+when the effect has been fully produced, the
+repetition of triumph:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Go to; farewell; put money enough in your purse!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The remainder&mdash;Iago's soliloquy&mdash;the motive-hunting
+of a motiveless malignity&mdash;how awful it
+is! Yea, whilst he is still allowed to bear the
+divine image, it is too fiendish for his own steady
+view,&mdash;for the lonely gaze of a being next to
+devil, and only not quite devil,&mdash;and yet a character
+which Shakespeare has attempted and executed,
+without disgust and without scandal!
+</p>
+
+<pb n='252'/><anchor id='Pg252'/>
+
+<p>
+Dr. Johnson has remarked that little or nothing
+is wanting to render the <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi> a regular tragedy,
+but to have opened the play with the arrival of
+Othello in Cyprus, and to have thrown the preceding
+act into the form of narration. Here then
+is the place to determine whether such a change
+would or would not be an improvement;&mdash;nay
+(to throw down the glove with a full challenge),
+whether the tragedy would or not by such an
+arrangement become more regular,&mdash;that is, more
+consonant with the rules dictated by universal
+reason, on the true common-sense of mankind, in
+its application to the particular case. For in all
+acts of judgment, it can never be too often recollected,
+and scarcely too often repeated, that rules
+are means to ends, and, consequently, that the end
+must be determined and understood before it can
+be known what the rules are or ought to be.
+Now, from a certain species of drama, proposing
+to itself the accomplishment of certain ends,&mdash;these
+partly arising from the idea of the species
+itself, but in part, likewise, forced upon the
+dramatist by accidental circumstances beyond his
+power to remove or control,&mdash;three rules have
+been abstracted;&mdash;in other words, the means most
+conducive to the attainment of the proposed ends
+have been generalised, and prescribed under the
+names of the three unities,&mdash;the unity of time, the
+unity of place, and the unity of action&mdash;which
+last would, perhaps, have been as appropriately,
+as well as more intelligibly, entitled the unity of
+interest. With this last the present question has
+no immediate concern: in fact, its conjunction
+with the former two is a mere delusion of words.
+It is not properly a rule, but in itself the great
+<pb n='253'/><anchor id='Pg253'/>
+end not only of the drama, but of the epic poem,
+the lyric ode, of all poetry, down to the candle-flame
+cone of an epigram,&mdash;nay, of poesy in
+general, as the proper generic term inclusive of
+all the fine arts as its species. But of the unities
+of time and place, which alone are entitled to the
+name of rules, the history of their origin will be
+their best criterion. You might take the Greek
+chorus to a place, but you could not bring a place
+to them without as palpable an equivoque as
+bringing Birnam wood to Macbeth at Dunsinane.
+It was the same, though in a less degree, with
+regard to the unity of time:&mdash;the positive fact,
+not for a moment removed from the senses, the
+presence, I mean, of the same identical chorus,
+was a continued measure of time;&mdash;and although
+the imagination may supersede perception, yet it
+must be granted to be an imperfection&mdash;however
+easily tolerated&mdash;to place the two in broad contradiction
+to each other. In truth, it is a mere
+accident of terms; for the Trilogy of the Greek
+theatre was a drama in three acts, and notwithstanding
+this, what strange contrivances as to
+place there are in the Aristophanic Frogs. Besides,
+if the law of mere actual perception is once
+violated&mdash;as it repeatedly is, even in the Greek
+tragedies&mdash;why is it more difficult to imagine
+three hours to be three years than to be a whole
+day and night?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Observe in how many ways Othello is made,
+first, our acquaintance, then our friend, then the
+object of our anxiety, before the deeper interest is
+to be approached!
+</p>
+
+<pb n='254'/><anchor id='Pg254'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Mont.</hi> But, good lieutenant, is your
+general wived?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cas.</hi> Most fortunately: he hath achieved a maid</l>
+<l>That paragons description, and wild fame;</l>
+<l>One that excels the quirks of blazoning pens,</l>
+<l>And, in the essential vesture of creation,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Does tire the ingener.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Here is Cassio's warm-hearted, yet perfectly disengaged,
+praise of Desdemona, and sympathy with
+the <q>most fortunately</q> wived Othello;&mdash;and yet
+Cassio is an enthusiastic admirer, almost a worshipper,
+of Desdemona. Oh, that detestable code
+that excellence cannot be loved in any form that
+is female, but it must needs be selfish! Observe
+Othello's <q>honest</q> and Cassio's <q>bold</q> Iago, and
+Cassio's full guileless-hearted wishes for the safety
+and love-raptures of Othello and <q>the divine
+Desdemona.</q> And also note the exquisite circumstance
+of Cassio's kissing Iago's wife, as if it
+ought to be impossible that the dullest auditor
+should not feel Cassio's religious love of Desdemona's
+purity. Iago's answers are the sneers
+which a proud bad intellect feels towards women,
+and expresses to a wife. Surely it ought to be
+considered a very exalted compliment to women,
+that all the sarcasms on them in Shakespeare are
+put in the mouths of villains.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Des.</hi> I am not merry; but I do beguile,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The struggle of courtesy in Desdemona to abstract
+her attention.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>(<hi rend='italic'>Iago aside</hi>). He takes her by the palm: Ay, well said, whisper;
+with as little a web as this, will I ensnare as great a fly as Cassio.
+Ay, smile upon her, do,</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+The importance given to trifles, and made fertile
+by the villany of the observer.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='255'/><anchor id='Pg255'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Iago's dialogue with Roderigo.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This is the rehearsal on the dupe of the traitor's
+intentions on Othello.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Iago's soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">But partly led to diet my revenge,</q></l>
+<l>For that I do suspect the lusty Moor</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Hath leap'd into my seat.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This thought, originally by Iago's own confession
+a mere suspicion, is now ripening, and gnaws
+his base nature as his own <q>poisonous mineral</q> is
+about to gnaw the noble heart of his general.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Othello's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I know, Iago,</q></l>
+<l>Thy honesty and love doth mince this matter,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Making it light to Cassio.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Honesty and love! Ay, and who but the reader of
+the play could think otherwise?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Iago's soliloquy:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And what's he then that says&mdash;I play the villain?</q></l>
+<l>When this advice is free I give, and honest,</l>
+<l>Provable to thinking, and, indeed, the course</l>
+<l><q rend="post">To win the Moor again.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+He is not, you see, an absolute fiend; or, at
+least, he wishes to think himself not so.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Des.</hi> Before Æmilia here,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">I give thee warrant of thy place.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The over-zeal of innocence in Desdemona.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Enter Desdemona and Æmilia.</hi></q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Oth.</hi> If she be false, O, then, heaven mocks itself!</l>
+<l><q rend="post">I'll not believe't.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Divine! The effect of innocence and the better
+genius!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Æmil.</hi> Why, the wrong is but a wrong i'
+the world; and</q></l>
+<l>having the world for your labour, 'tis a wrong in your own world,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">and you might quickly make it right.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='256'/><anchor id='Pg256'/>
+
+<p>
+Warburton's note.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+What any other man, who had learning enough,
+might have quoted as a playful and witty illustration
+of his remarks against the Calvinistic <hi rend='italic'>thesis</hi>,
+Warburton gravely attributes to Shakespeare as
+intentional; and this, too, in the mouth of a lady's
+woman!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. last scene. Othello's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q rend="pre">Of one, whose hand,</q></l>
+<l>Like the base <hi rend='italic'>Indian</hi>, threw a pearl away</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Richer than all his tribe,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Theobald's note from Warburton.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Thus it is for no-poets to comment on the
+greatest of poets! To make Othello say that he,
+who had killed his wife, was like Herod who killed
+Mariamne!&mdash;O, how many beauties, in this one
+line, were impenetrable to the ever thought-swarming,
+but idealess, Warburton! Othello
+wishes to excuse himself on the score of ignorance,
+and yet not to excuse himself,&mdash;to excuse himself
+by accusing. This struggle of feeling is finely
+conveyed in the word <q>base,</q> which is applied to
+the rude Indian, not in his own character, but
+as the momentary representative of Othello's.
+<q>Indian</q>&mdash;for I retain the old reading&mdash;means
+American, a savage <hi rend='italic'>in genere</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Finally, let me repeat that Othello does not kill
+Desdemona in jealousy, but in a conviction forced
+upon him by the almost superhuman art of Iago,
+such a conviction as any man would and must
+have entertained who had believed Iago's honesty
+as Othello did. We, the audience, know that
+Iago is a villain, from the beginning; but in considering
+the essence of the Shakespearian Othello,
+we must perseveringly place ourselves in his situation,
+<pb n='257'/><anchor id='Pg257'/>
+and under his circumstances. Then we shall
+immediately feel the fundamental difference between
+the solemn agony of the noble Moor, and
+the wretched fishing jealousies of Leontes, and the
+morbid suspiciousness of Leonatus, who is, in other
+respects, a fine character. Othello had no life but
+in Desdemona:&mdash;the belief that she, his angel, had
+fallen from the heaven of her native innocence,
+wrought a civil war in his heart. She is his
+counterpart; and, like him, is almost sanctified in
+our eyes by her absolute unsuspiciousness, and
+holy entireness of love. As the curtain drops,
+which do we pity the most?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Extremum hunc</hi>&mdash;&mdash;. There are three
+powers:&mdash;Wit, which discovers partial likeness
+hidden in general diversity; subtlety, which discovers
+the diversity concealed in general apparent
+sameness;&mdash;and profundity, which discovers an
+essential unity under all the semblances of
+difference.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Give to a subtle man fancy, and he is a wit; to
+a deep man imagination, and he is a philosopher.
+Add, again, pleasurable sensibility in the threefold
+form of sympathy with the interesting in morals,
+the impressive in form, and the harmonious in
+sound,&mdash;and you have the poet.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But combine all,&mdash;wit, subtlety, and fancy, with
+profundity, imagination, and moral and physical
+susceptibility of the pleasurable,&mdash;and let the
+object of action be man universal; and we shall
+have&mdash;O, rash prophecy! say, rather, we have&mdash;a
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>Shakespeare</hi>!
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='261'/><anchor id='Pg261'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Notes on Ben Jonson.</head>
+
+<p>
+It would be amusing to collect out of our dramatists
+from Elizabeth to Charles I. proofs of
+the manners of the times. One striking symptom
+of general coarseness of manners, which may co-exist
+with great refinement of morals, as, alas!
+<hi rend='italic'>vice versa</hi>, is to be seen in the very frequent allusions
+to the olfactories with their most disgusting
+stimulants, and these, too, in the conversation of
+virtuous ladies. This would not appear so strange
+to one who had been on terms of familiarity with
+Sicilian and Italian women of rank: and bad as
+they may, too many of them, actually be, yet I
+doubt not that the extreme grossness of their
+language has impressed many an Englishman of
+the present era with far darker notions than the
+same language would have produced in the mind
+of one of Elizabeth's or James's courtiers. Those
+who have read Shakespeare only, complain of
+occasional grossness in his plays; but compare
+him with his contemporaries, and the inevitable
+conviction, is that of the exquisite purity of his
+imagination.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The observation I have prefixed to the <hi rend='italic'>Volpone</hi>
+is the key to the faint interest which these noble
+efforts of intellectual power excite, with the
+exception of the fragment of the <hi rend='italic'>Sad Shepherd</hi>;
+because in that piece only is there any character
+with whom you can morally sympathise. On the
+<pb n='262'/><anchor id='Pg262'/>
+other hand, <hi rend='italic'>Measure for Measure</hi> is the only play
+of Shakespeare's in which there are not some one
+or more characters, generally many, whom you
+follow with affectionate feeling. For I confess that
+Isabella, of all Shakespeare's female characters,
+pleases me the least; and <hi rend='italic'>Measure for Measure</hi> is,
+indeed, the only one of his genuine works, which
+is painful to me.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Let me not conclude this remark, however,
+without a thankful acknowledgment to the <hi rend='italic'>manes</hi>
+of Ben Jonson, that the more I study his writings,
+I the more admire them; and the more my study
+of him resembles that of an ancient classic, in the
+<hi rend='italic'>minutiæ</hi> of his rhythm, metre, choice of words,
+forms of connection, and so forth, the more
+numerous have the points of my admiration
+become. I may add, too, that both the study and
+the admiration cannot but be disinterested, for to
+expect therefrom any advantage to the present
+drama would be ignorance. The latter is utterly
+heterogeneous from the drama of the Shakespearian
+age, with a diverse object and contrary principle.
+The one was to present a model by imitation of
+real life, taking from real life all that in it which
+it ought to be, and supplying the rest;&mdash;the other
+is to copy what is, and as it is,&mdash;at best a tolerable
+but most frequently a blundering, copy. In the
+former the difference was an essential element; in
+the latter an involuntary defect. We should think
+it strange, if a tale in dance were announced, and
+the actors did not dance at all;&mdash;and yet such is
+modern comedy.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='263'/><anchor id='Pg263'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Whalley's Preface.</head>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>But Jonson was soon sensible, how inconsistent this medley of
+names and manners was in reason and nature; and with how little
+propriety it could ever have a place in a legitimate and just picture
+of real life.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+But did Jonson reflect that the very essence of
+a play, the very language in which it is
+written, is a fiction to which all the parts must
+conform? Surely, Greek manners in English
+should be a still grosser improbability than a
+Greek name transferred to English manners. Ben's
+<hi rend='italic'>personæ</hi> are too often not characters, but derangements;&mdash;the
+hopeless patients of a mad-doctor
+rather,&mdash;exhibitions of folly betraying itself in
+spite of exciting reason and prudence. He not
+poetically, but painfully exaggerates every trait;
+that is, not by the drollery of the circumstance,
+but by the excess of the originating feeling.
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>But to this we might reply, that far from being thought to
+build his characters upon abstract ideas, he was really accused of
+representing particular persons then existing; and that even those
+characters which appear to be the most exaggerated, are said to
+have had their respective archetypes in nature and life.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+This degrades Jonson into a libeller, instead of
+justifying him as a dramatic poet. <hi rend='italic'>Non quod
+verum est, sed quod verisimile</hi>, is the dramatist's
+rule. At all events, the poet who chooses transitory
+manners, ought to content himself with transitory
+praise. If his object be reputation, he ought
+not to expect fame. The utmost he can look forwards
+to, is to be quoted by, and to enliven the
+<pb n='264'/><anchor id='Pg264'/>
+writings of, an antiquarian. Pistol, Nym, and <hi rend='italic'>id
+genus omne</hi>, do not please us as characters, but are
+endured as fantastic creations, foils to the native
+wit of Falstaff.&mdash;I say wit emphatically; for this
+character so often extolled as the masterpiece of
+humour, neither contains, nor was meant to contain,
+any humour at all.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Whalley's <q>Life Of Jonson.</q></q></head>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>It is to the honour of Jonson's judgment, that <emph>the greatest poet of
+our nation</emph> had the same opinion of Donne's genius and wit; and
+hath preserved part of him from perishing, by putting his thoughts
+and satire into modern verse.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Videlicet</hi> Pope!&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>He said further to Drummond, Shakespeare wanted art, and
+sometimes sense; for in one of his plays he brought in a number
+of men, saying they had suffered shipwreck in Bohemia, where is
+no sea near by a hundred miles.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+I have often thought Shakespeare justified in
+this seeming anachronism. In Pagan times
+a single name of a German kingdom might well
+be supposed to comprise a hundred miles more
+than at present. The truth is, these notes of
+Drummond's are more disgraceful to himself than
+to Jonson. It would be easy to conjecture how
+grossly Jonson must have been misunderstood,
+and what he had said in jest, as of Hippocrates,
+interpreted in earnest. But this is characteristic
+of a Scotchman; he has no notion of a jest, unless
+you tell him&mdash;<q>This is a joke!</q>&mdash;and still less of
+that finer shade of feeling, the half-and-half, in
+which Englishmen naturally delight.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='265'/><anchor id='Pg265'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Every Man Out Of His Humour.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Epilogue.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">The throat of war be stopt within her land,</q></l>
+<l>And <emph>turtle-footed</emph> peace dance fairie rings</l>
+<l><q rend="post">About her court.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>Turtle-footed</q> is a pretty word, a very
+pretty word: pray, what does it mean?
+Doves, I presume, are not dancers; and the other
+sort of turtle, land or sea, green-fat or hawksbill,
+would, I should suppose, succeed better in slow
+minuets than in the brisk rondillo. In one sense,
+to be sure, pigeons and ring-doves could not dance
+but with <hi rend='italic'>éclat</hi>&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>a claw</hi>!
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='266'/><anchor id='Pg266'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Poetaster.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Introduction.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Light! I salute thee, but with wounded nerves,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Wishing thy golden splendour pitchy darkness.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+There is no reason to suppose Satan's address
+to the sun in the <hi rend='italic'>Paradise Lost</hi>, more than a
+mere coincidence with these lines; but were it
+otherwise, it would be a fine instance what
+usurious interest a great genius pays in borrowing.
+It would not be difficult to give a detailed
+psychological proof from these constant outbursts
+of anxious self-assertion, that Jonson was not a
+genius, a creative power. Subtract that one
+thing, and you may safely accumulate on his
+name all other excellences of a capacious, vigorous,
+agile, and richly-stored intellect.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Ovid.</hi> While slaves be false, fathers hard,
+and bawds be</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">whorish.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The roughness noticed by Theobald and Whalley,
+may be cured by a simple transposition:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>While fathers hard, slaves false, and bawds be whorish.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Act. iv. sc. 3&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Crisp.</hi>
+O&mdash;oblatrant&mdash;furibund&mdash;fatuate&mdash;strenuous.</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">O&mdash;conscious.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It would form an interesting essay, or rather
+series of essays, in a periodical work, were all the
+attempts to ridicule new phrases brought together,
+the proportion observed of words ridiculed which
+have been adopted, and are now common, such as
+<pb n='267'/><anchor id='Pg267'/>
+<emph>strenuous</emph>, <emph>conscious</emph>, &amp;c., and a trial made how far
+any grounds can be detected, so that one might
+determine beforehand whether a word was invented
+under the conditions of assimilability to
+our language or not. Thus much is certain, that
+the ridiculers were as often wrong as right; and
+Shakespeare himself could not prevent the naturalisation
+of <emph>accommodation</emph>, <emph>remuneration</emph>, &amp;c.; or
+Swift the gross abuse even of the word <emph>idea</emph>.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='268'/><anchor id='Pg268'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Fall Of Sejanus.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Arruntius.</hi> The name Tiberius,</q></l>
+<l>I hope, will keep, howe'er he hath foregone</l>
+<l>The dignity and power.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Silius.</hi> Sure, while he lives.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Arr.</hi> And dead, it comes to Drusus. Should he fail,</l>
+<l>To the brave issue of Germanicus;</l>
+<l>And they are three: too many (ha?) for him</l>
+<l>To have a plot upon?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Sil.</hi> I do not know</l>
+<l>The heart of his designs; but, sure, their face</l>
+<l>Looks farther than the present.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Arr.</hi> By the gods,</l>
+<l>If I could guess he had but such a thought,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">My sword should cleave him down,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The anachronic mixture in this Arruntius of
+the Roman republican, to whom Tiberius
+must have appeared as much a tyrant as Sejanus,
+with his James-and-Charles-the-First zeal for
+legitimacy of descent in this passage, is amusing.
+Of our great names Milton was, I think, the first
+who could properly be called a republican. My
+recollections of Buchanan's works are too faint to
+enable me to judge whether the historian is not a
+fair exception.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Speech of Sejanus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Adultery! it is the lightest ill</q></l>
+<l>I will commit. A race of wicked acts</l>
+<l>Shall flow out of my anger, and o'erspread</l>
+<l>The world's wide face, which no posterity</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Shall e'er approve, nor yet keep silent,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The more we reflect and examine, examine and
+reflect, the more astonished shall we be at the
+immense superiority of Shakespeare over his contemporaries;&mdash;and
+<pb n='269'/><anchor id='Pg269'/>
+yet what contemporaries!&mdash;giant
+minds indeed! Think of Jonson's erudition,
+and the force of learned authority in that age;
+and yet, in no genuine part of Shakespeare's works
+is there to be found such an absurd rant and
+ventriloquism as this, and too, too many other
+passages ferruminated by Jonson from Seneca's
+tragedies, and the writings of the later Romans.
+I call it ventriloquism, because Sejanus is a
+puppet, out of which the poet makes his own
+voice appear to come.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. Scene of the sacrifice to Fortune.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This scene is unspeakably irrational. To believe,
+and yet to scoff at, a present miracle is
+little less than impossible. Sejanus should have
+been made to suspect priestcraft and a secret
+conspiracy against him.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='270'/><anchor id='Pg270'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Volpone.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This admirable, indeed, but yet more wonderful
+than admirable, play is, from the fertility and
+vigour of invention, character, language, and
+sentiment, the strongest proof how impossible it is
+to keep up any pleasurable interest in a tale, in
+which there is no goodness of heart in any of the
+prominent characters. After the third act, this
+play becomes not a dead, but a painful, weight on
+the feelings. <hi rend='italic'>Zeluco</hi> is an instance of the same
+truth. Bonario and Celia should have been made
+in some way or other principals in the plot; which
+they might have been, and the objects of interest,
+without having been made characters. In novels,
+the person in whose fate you are most interested,
+is often the least marked character of the whole.
+If it were possible to lessen the paramountcy of
+Volpone himself, a most delightful comedy might
+be produced, by making Celia the ward or niece
+of Corvino, instead of his wife, and Bonario her
+lover.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='271'/><anchor id='Pg271'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Apicæne.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This is to my feelings the most entertaining of
+old Ben's comedies, and, more than any
+other, would admit of being brought out anew, if
+under the management of a judicious and stage-understanding
+playwright; and an actor, who
+had studied Morose, might make his fortune.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Clerimont's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">He would have hang'd a pewterer's 'prentice once upon a Shrove</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Tuesday's riot, for being of that trade, when the rest were
+<emph>quiet</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>The old copies read <emph>quit</emph>,&mdash;<hi rend='italic'>i.e.</hi>,
+discharged from working, and
+gone to divert themselves.</q>&mdash;Whalley's note.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+It should be <q>quit</q> no doubt, but not meaning
+<q>discharged from working,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;but quit, that
+is, acquitted. The pewterer was at his holiday
+diversion as well as the other apprentices, and
+they as forward in the riot as he. But he alone
+was punished under pretext of the riot, but in fact
+for his trade.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q><hi rend='italic'>Morose.</hi> Cannot I, yet, find out a more compendious method
+than by this <emph>trunk</emph>, to save my servants the labour of speech, and
+mine ears the discord of sounds?</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+What does <q>trunk</q> mean here, and in the first
+scene of the first act? Is it a large ear-trumpet?&mdash;or
+rather a tube, such as passes from parlour to
+kitchen, instead of a bell?
+</p>
+
+<pb n='272'/><anchor id='Pg272'/>
+
+<p>
+Whalley's note at the end:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Some critics of the last age imagined the character of Morose
+to be wholly out of nature. But to vindicate our poet, Mr. Dryden
+tells us from tradition, and we may venture to take his word, that
+Jonson was really acquainted with a person of this whimsical turn
+of mind: and as humour is a personal quality, the poet is acquitted
+from the charge of exhibiting a monster, or an extravagant unnatural
+<hi rend='italic'>caricatura</hi>.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+If Dryden had not made all additional proof
+superfluous by his own plays, this very vindication
+would evince that he had formed a false and
+vulgar conception of the nature and conditions of
+drama and dramatic personation. Ben Jonson
+would himself have rejected such a plea:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">For he knew, poet never credit gain'd</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">By writing <emph>truths</emph>, but things, like truths,
+well feign'd.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+By <q>truths</q> he means <q>facts.</q> Caricatures are
+not less so because they are found existing in real
+life. Comedy demands characters, and leaves
+caricatures to farce. The safest and the truest
+defence of old Ben would be to call the <hi rend='italic'>Epicœne</hi>
+the best of farces. The defect in Morose, as in
+other of Jonson's <hi rend='italic'>dramatis personæ</hi>, lies in this;&mdash;that
+the accident is not a prominence growing out
+of, and nourished by, the character which still
+circulates in it; but that the character, such as it
+is, rises out of, or, rather, consists in, the accident.
+Shakespeare's comic personages have exquisitely
+characteristic features; however awry, disproportionate,
+and laughable they may be, still, like
+Bardolph's nose, they are features. But Jonson's
+are either a man with a huge wen, having a circulation
+of its own, and which we might conceive
+amputated, and the patient thereby losing all his
+character; or they are mere wens themselves
+<pb n='273'/><anchor id='Pg273'/>
+instead of men,&mdash;wens personified, or with eyes,
+nose, and mouth cut out, mandrake-fashion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Nota bene.</hi>&mdash;All the above, and much more,
+will have justly been said, if, and whenever, the
+drama of Jonson is brought into comparisons of
+rivalry with the Shakespearian. But this should
+not be. Let its inferiority to the Shakespearian
+be at once fairly owned,&mdash;but at the same time as
+the inferiority of an altogether different <hi rend='italic'>genius</hi> of
+the drama. On this ground, old Ben would still
+maintain his proud height. He, no less than
+Shakespeare stands on the summit of his hill, and
+looks round him like a master,&mdash;though his be
+Lattrig and Shakespeare's Skiddaw.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='274'/><anchor id='Pg274'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Alchemist.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 2. Face's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Will take his oath o' the Greek <hi rend='italic'>Xenophon</hi>,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">If need be, in his pocket.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Another reading is <q>Testament.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Probably, the meaning is&mdash;that intending
+to give false evidence, he carried a Greek <hi rend='italic'>Xenophon</hi>
+to pass it off for a Greek Testament, and so
+avoid perjury&mdash;as the Irish do, by contriving to
+kiss their thumb-nails instead of the book.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2. Mammon's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I will have all my beds blown up; not stuft:</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Down is too hard.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Thus the air-cushions, though perhaps only
+lately brought into use, were invented in idea in
+the seventeenth century!
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='275'/><anchor id='Pg275'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Catiline's Conspiracy.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+A fondness for judging one work by comparison
+with others, perhaps altogether of a
+different class, argues a vulgar taste. Yet it is
+chiefly on this principle that the <hi rend='italic'>Catiline</hi> has been
+rated so low. Take it and <hi rend='italic'>Sejanus</hi>, as compositions
+of a particular kind, namely, as a mode of relating
+great historical events in the liveliest and most
+interesting manner, and I cannot help wishing
+that we had whole volumes of such plays. We
+might as rationally expect the excitement of the
+<hi rend='italic'>Vicar of Wakefield</hi> from Goldsmith's <hi rend='italic'>History of
+England</hi>, as that of <hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Othello</hi>,
+&amp;c., from the
+<hi rend='italic'>Sejanus</hi> or <hi rend='italic'>Catiline</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Cat.</hi> Sirrah, what ail you?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">(<hi rend='italic'>He spies one of his boys not
+answer.</hi>)</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Pag.</hi> Nothing.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Best.</hi> Somewhat modest.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Cat.</hi> Slave, I will strike your soul
+out with my foot,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is either an unintelligible, or, in every
+sense, a most unnatural, passage,&mdash;improbable, if
+not impossible, at the moment of signing and
+swearing such a conspiracy, to the most libidinous
+satyr. The very presence of the boys is an outrage
+to probability. I suspect that these lines down to
+the words <q>throat opens,</q> should be removed back
+so as to follow the words <q>on this part of the
+house,</q> in the speech of Catiline soon after the
+<pb n='276'/><anchor id='Pg276'/>
+entry of the conspirators. A total erasure, however,
+would be the best, or, rather, the only
+possible, amendment.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2. Sempronia's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">...<q rend="pre">He is but a new fellow,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">An <emph>inmate</emph> here in Rome, as Catiline calls him.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+A <q>lodger</q> would have been a happier imitation
+of the <hi rend='italic'>inquilinus</hi> of Sallust.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 6. Speech of Cethegus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Can these or such be any aids to us,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What a strange notion Ben must have formed
+of a determined, remorseless, all-daring, foolhardiness,
+to have represented it in such a
+mouthing Tamburlane, and bombastic tonguebully
+as this Cethegus of his!
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='277'/><anchor id='Pg277'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Bartholomew Fair.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Induction. Scrivener's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">If there be never a <emph>servant-monster</emph> in the Fair,
+who can help it</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">he says, nor a nest of antiques?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The best excuse that can be made for Jonson,
+and in a somewhat less degree for Beaumont
+and Fletcher, in respect of these base and silly
+sneers at Shakespeare is, that his plays were
+present to men's minds chiefly as acted. They
+had not a neat edition of them, as we have, so as,
+by comparing the one with the other, to form a
+just notion of the mighty mind that produced the
+whole. At all events, and in every point of view,
+Jonson stands far higher in a moral light than
+Beaumont and Fletcher. He was a fair contemporary,
+and in his way, and as far as Shakespeare
+is concerned, an original. But Beaumont and
+Fletcher were always imitators of, and often
+borrowers from him, and yet sneer at him with a
+spite far more malignant than Jonson, who,
+besides, has made noble compensation by his
+praises.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Just.</hi> I mean a child of the horn-thumb,
+a babe <emph>of booty</emph>, boy, a</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">cut purse.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Does not this confirm, what the passage itself
+cannot but suggest, the propriety of substituting
+<q>booty</q> for <q>beauty</q> in Falstaff's speech, <hi rend='italic'>Henry
+IV.</hi> part i. act i. sc. 2. <q>Let not us, &amp;c.?</q>
+</p>
+
+<pb n='278'/><anchor id='Pg278'/>
+
+<p>
+It is not often that old Ben condescends to
+imitate a modern author; but Master Dan. Knockhum
+Jordan, and his vapours are manifest reflexes
+of Nym and Pistol.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Quarl.</hi> She'll make excellent geer for
+the coachmakers here in</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Smithfield, to anoint wheels and axletrees with.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Good! but yet it falls short of the speech of a
+Mr. Johnes, M.P., in the Common Council, on
+the invasion intended by Buonaparte:&mdash;<q>Houses
+plundered&mdash;then burnt;&mdash;sons conscribed&mdash;wives
+and daughters ravished,</q> &amp;c., &amp;c.&mdash;<q>But as for
+you, you luxurious Aldermen! with your fat will
+he grease the wheels of his triumphant chariot!</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Cok.</hi> Avoid in your satin doublet, Numps.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This reminds me of Shakespeare's <q>Aroint thee,
+witch!</q> I find in several books of that age the
+words <hi rend='italic'>aloigne</hi> and <hi rend='italic'>eloigne</hi>&mdash;that
+is,&mdash;<q>keep your
+distance!</q> or <q>off with you!</q> Perhaps <q>aroint</q>
+was a corruption of <q>aloigne</q> by the vulgar.
+The common etymology from <hi rend='italic'>ronger</hi> to gnaw
+seems unsatisfactory.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Quarl.</hi> How now, Numps! almost
+tired in your protectorship?</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">overparted, overparted?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+An odd sort of propheticality in this Numps and
+old Noll!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6. Knockhum's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>He eats with his eyes, as well as his teeth.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+A good motto for the Parson in Hogarth's <hi rend='italic'>Election
+Dinner</hi>,&mdash;who shows how easily he might be
+reconciled to the Church of Rome, for he worships
+what he eats.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='279'/><anchor id='Pg279'/>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 5.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Pup.</hi> <hi rend='italic'>Di.</hi> It is not
+profane.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Lan.</hi> It is not profane, he says.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Boy.</hi> It is profane.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Pup.</hi> It is not profane.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Boy.</hi> It is profane.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Pup.</hi> It is not profane.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Lan.</hi> Well said, confute him with Not,
+still.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+An imitation of the quarrel between Bacchus
+and the Frogs in Aristophanes:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Χορός.</q></l>
+<l>ἀλλὰ μὴν κεκραξόμεσθά γ',</l>
+<l>ὁπόσον ἡ φάρυνξ ἂν ἡμῶν</l>
+<l>χανδάνη δι' ἡμέρας,</l>
+<l>βρεκεκεκὲξ, κοὰξ, κοὰξ.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l>Διόνυσος.</l>
+<l>τούτω γὰρ οὐ νικήσετε.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l>Χορός.</l>
+<l>οὐδὲ μὴν ἡμᾶς σὺ τάντως.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l>Διόνυσος.</l>
+<l><q rend="post">οὐδὲ μὴν ὑμεῖς γε δή μ' οὐδέποτε.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='280'/><anchor id='Pg280'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Devil Is An Ass.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Pug.</hi> Why any: Fraud,</q></l>
+<l>Or Covetousness, or lady Vanity,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Or old Iniquity, <emph>I'll call him hither</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>The words in italics should probably be given to the master-devil,
+Satan.</q>&mdash;Whalley's note.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+That is, against all probability, and with a (for
+Jonson) impossible violation of character.
+The words plainly belong to Pug, and mark at
+once his simpleness and his impatience.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4. Fitz-dottrel's soliloquy.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Compare this exquisite piece of sense, satire, and
+sound philosophy in 1616 with Sir M. Hale's
+speech from the bench in a trial of a witch many
+years afterwards.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Meercraft's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Sir, money's a whore, a bawd, a drudge.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I doubt not that <q>money</q> was the first word of
+the line, and has dropped out:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Money! Sir, money's a,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='281'/><anchor id='Pg281'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Staple Of News.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Pecunia's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">No, he would ha' done,</q></l>
+<l>That lay not in his power: he had the use</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of your bodies, Band and Wax, and sometimes Statute's.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read (1815)&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 9">... <q rend="pre">he had the use of</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Your bodies,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Now, however, I doubt the legitimacy of my
+transposition of the <q>of</q> from the beginning
+of this latter line to the end of the one preceding;&mdash;for
+though it facilitates the metre and reading
+of the latter line, and is frequent in Massinger,
+this disjunction of the preposition from its case
+seems to have been disallowed by Jonson. Perhaps
+the better reading is&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>O' your bodies,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+the two syllables being slurred into one, or rather
+snatched, or sucked, up into the emphasised
+<q>your.</q> In all points of view, therefore, Ben's
+judgment is just; for in this way, the line cannot
+be read, as metre, without that strong and quick
+emphasis on <q>your</q> which the sense requires;&mdash;and
+had not the sense required an emphasis on
+<q>your,</q> the <hi rend='italic'>tmesis</hi> of the sign of its cases <q>of,</q>
+<q>to,</q> &amp;c., would destroy almost all boundary
+between the dramatic verse and prose in comedy:&mdash;a
+lesson not to be rash in conjectural amendments.&mdash;1818.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='282'/><anchor id='Pg282'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 4.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>P. jun.</hi> I love all men of virtue, <emph>frommy</emph>
+Princess.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>Frommy,</q> <hi rend='italic'>fromme</hi>&mdash;pious, dutiful, &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act v. sc. 4. Penny-boy, sen., and Porter.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+I dare not, will not, think that honest Ben had
+<hi rend='italic'>Lear</hi> in his mind in this mock mad scene.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='283'/><anchor id='Pg283'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The New Inn.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Host's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>A heavy purse, and then two turtles, <emph>makes</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>Makes,</q> frequent in old books, and even now
+used in some counties for mates, or pairs.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Host's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">...<q rend="pre">And for a leap</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of the vaulting horse, to <emph>play</emph> the vaulting
+<emph>house</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Instead of reading with Whalley <q>ply</q> for
+<q>play,</q> I would suggest <q>horse</q> for <q>house.</q>
+The meaning would then be obvious and pertinent.
+The punlet, or pun-maggot, or pun intentional,
+<q>horse and house,</q> is below Jonson. The <hi rend='italic'>jeu-de-mots</hi>
+just below&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">...<q rend="pre">Read a lecture</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Upon <hi rend='italic'>Aquinas</hi> at St. Thomas à <hi rend='italic'>Water</hi>ings</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+had a learned smack in it to season its insipidity.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 6. Lovel's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Then shower'd his bounties on me, like the Hours,</q></l>
+<l>That open-handed sit upon the clouds,</l>
+<l>And press the liberality of heaven</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Down to the laps of thankful men!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Like many other similar passages in Jonson,
+this is εῖδος χαλεπὸν ἰδεῖν&mdash;a sight which it is difficult
+to make one's self see,&mdash;a picture my fancy
+cannot copy detached from the words.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 5. Though it was hard upon old Ben,
+yet Felton, it must be confessed, was in the right
+in considering the Fly, Tipto, Bat Burst, &amp;c., of
+<pb n='284'/><anchor id='Pg284'/>
+this play mere dotages. Such a scene as this was
+enough to damn a new play; and Nick Stuff is
+worse still,&mdash;most abominable stuff indeed!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 2. Lovel's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">So knowledge first begets benevolence,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Benevolence breeds friendship, friendship love.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Jonson has elsewhere proceeded thus far; but
+the part most difficult and delicate, yet, perhaps,
+not the least capable of being both morally and
+poetically treated, is the union itself, and what,
+even in this life, it can be.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='285'/><anchor id='Pg285'/>
+
+<div rend="page-break-before: right">
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Notes On Beaumont And Fletcher.</head>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>Seward's</hi> Preface. 1750.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>The <hi rend='italic'>King and No King</hi>, too, is extremely spirited in all its
+characters; Arbaces holds up a mirror to all men of virtuous
+principles but violent passions. Hence he is, as it were, at once
+magnanimity and pride, patience and fury, gentleness and rigour,
+chastity and incest, and is one of the finest mixtures of virtues and
+vices that any poet has drawn,</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+These are among the endless instances of the
+abject state to which psychology had sunk
+from the reign of Charles I. to the middle of the
+present reign of George III.; and even now it is
+but just awaking.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Seward's comparison of Julia's speech in
+the <hi rend='italic'>Two Gentlemen of Verona</hi>, act iv. last scene&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Madam, 'twas Ariadne passioning,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+with Aspatia's speech in the <hi rend='italic'>Maid's Tragedy</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I stand upon the sea-beach now,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;Act ii.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and preference of the latter.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is strange to take an incidental passage of one
+writer, intended only for a subordinate part, and
+compare it with the same thought in another
+writer, who had chosen it for a prominent and
+principal figure.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Seward's preference of Alphonso's poisoning
+<pb n='286'/><anchor id='Pg286'/>
+in <hi rend='italic'>A Wife for a Month</hi>, act i. sc. 1, to the passage
+in <hi rend='italic'>King John</hi>, act v. sc. 7:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Poison'd, ill fare! dead, forsook, cast off!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Mr. Seward! Mr. Seward! you may be, and I
+trust you are, an angel; but you were an ass.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Every reader of <emph>taste</emph> will see how superior this is to the
+quotation from Shakespeare.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Of what taste?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Seward's classification of the plays.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Surely <hi rend='italic'>Monsieur Thomas</hi>, the
+<hi rend='italic'>Chances</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Beggar's
+Bush</hi>, and the <hi rend='italic'>Pilgrim</hi>, should have been placed in
+the very first class! But the whole attempt ends
+in a woful failure.
+</p>
+
+<pb n='287'/><anchor id='Pg287'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Harris's Commendatory Poem On Fletcher.</head>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">I'd have a state of wit convok'd, which hath</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">A <emph>power</emph> to take up on common faith:</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This is an instance of that modifying of
+quantity by emphasis, without which our
+elder poets cannot be scanned. <q>Power,</q> here,
+instead of being one long syllable&mdash;pow'r&mdash;must
+be sounded, not indeed as a spondee, nor yet as a
+trochee; but as - u u;&mdash;the first syllable is 1-1/4.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+We can, indeed, never expect an authentic
+edition of our elder dramatic poets (for in those
+times a drama was a poem), until some man undertakes
+the work, who has studied the philosophy of
+metre. This has been found the main torch of
+sound restoration in the Greek dramatists by
+Bentley, Porson, and their followers;&mdash;how much
+more, then, in writers in our own language! It
+is true that quantity, an almost iron law with the
+Greek, is in English rather a subject for a peculiarly
+fine ear, than any law or even rule; but,
+then, instead of it, we have, first, accent; secondly,
+emphasis; and lastly, retardation, and acceleration
+of the times of syllables according to the meaning
+of the words, the passion that accompanies them,
+and even the character of the person that uses
+them. With due attention to these,&mdash;above all,
+to that, which requires the most attention and the
+finest taste, the character, Massinger, for example,
+might be reduced to a rich and yet regular metre.
+<pb n='288'/><anchor id='Pg288'/>
+But then the <hi rend='italic'>regulæ</hi> must be first known; though
+I will venture to say, that he who does not find a
+line (not corrupted) of Massinger's flow to the time
+total of a trimeter catalectic iambic verse, has not
+read it aright. But by virtue of the last principle&mdash;the
+retardation of acceleration of time&mdash;we
+have the proceleusmatic foot u u u u, and the <hi rend='italic'>dispondæus</hi>
+- - - -, not to mention the <hi rend='italic'>choriambus</hi>, the
+ionics, pæons, and epitrites. Since Dryden, the
+metre of our poets leads to the sense; in our elder
+and more genuine bards, the sense, including the
+passion, leads to the metre. Read even Donne's
+satires as he meant them to be read, and as the
+sense and passion demand, and you will find in the
+lines a manly harmony.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head>Life Of Fletcher In Stockdale's Edition, 1811.</head>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>In general their plots are more regular than Shakespeare's.</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+This is true, if true at all, only before a court
+of criticism, which judges one scheme by the
+laws of another and a diverse one. Shakespeare's
+plots have their own laws of <hi rend='italic'>regulæ</hi>, and according
+to these they are regular.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='289'/><anchor id='Pg289'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Maid's Tragedy.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. The metrical arrangement is most
+slovenly throughout.
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q><hi rend='italic'>Strat.</hi> As well as masque can be,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and all that follows to <q>who is return'd</q>&mdash;is
+plainly blank verse, and falls easily into it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Melantius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">These soft and silken wars are not for me:</q></l>
+<l>The music must be shrill, and all confus'd,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">That stirs my blood; and then I dance with arms.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What strange self-trumpeters and tongue-bullies
+all the brave soldiers of Beaumont and Fletcher
+are! Yet I am inclined to think it was the fashion
+of the age from the Soldier's speech in the Counter
+Scuffle; and deeper than the fashion B. and F. did
+not fashion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Lysippus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Yes, but this lady</q></l>
+<l>Walks discontented, with her wat'ry eyes</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Bent on the earth,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Opulent as Shakespeare was, and of his opulence
+prodigal, he yet would not have put this exquisite
+piece of poetry in the mouth of a no-character, or
+as addressed to a Melantius. I wish that B. and
+F. had written poems instead of tragedies.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Mel.</hi> I might run fiercely, not more
+hastily,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Upon my foe.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I mĭght rūn <emph>mŏre</emph> fiērcelȳ, not more hastily.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='290'/><anchor id='Pg290'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Calianax:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Office! I would I could put it off! I am sure I sweat quite
+through my office!</q>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+The syllable <hi rend='italic'>off</hi> reminds the testy statesman of
+his robe, and he carries on the image.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Melantius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Would that blood,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">That sea of blood, that I have lost in fight,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+All B. and F.'s generals are pugilists or cudgel-fighters,
+that boast of their bottom and of the <hi rend='italic'>claret</hi>
+they have shed.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> The Masque;&mdash;Cinthia's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">But I will give a greater state and glory,</q></l>
+<l>And raise to time a <emph>noble</emph> memory</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of what these lovers are.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I suspect that <q>nobler,</q> pronounced as <q>nobiler</q>
+- u -, was the poet's word, and that the accent is
+to be placed on the penultimate of <q>memory.</q> As
+to the passage&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Yet, while our reign lasts, let us stretch our power,</q> &amp;c.&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+removed from the text of Cinthia's speech, by these
+foolish editors as unworthy of B. and F.&mdash;the first
+eight lines are not worse, and the last couplet
+incomparably better, than the stanza retained.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Amintor's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Oh, thou hast nam'd a word, that wipes away</q></l>
+<l>All thoughts revengeful! In that sacred name,</l>
+<l><q rend="post"><q>The king,</q> there lies a terror.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It is worth noticing that of the three greatest
+tragedians, Massinger was a democrat, Beaumont
+and Fletcher the most servile <hi rend='italic'>jure divino</hi> royalists,
+and Shakespeare a philosopher;&mdash;if aught personal,
+an aristocrat.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='291'/><anchor id='Pg291'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>A King And No King.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. Speech of Tigranes:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">She, that forgat the greatness of her grief</q></l>
+<l>And miseries, that must follow such mad passions,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Endless and wild as women!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward's note and suggestion of <q>in.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It would be amusing to learn from some
+existing friend of Mr. Seward what he meant, or
+rather dreamed, in this note. It is certainly a
+difficult passage, of which there are two solutions;&mdash;one,
+that the writer was somewhat more injudicious
+than usual;&mdash;the other, that he was very,
+very much more profound and Shakespearian than
+usual. Seward's emendation, at all events, is right
+and obvious. Were it a passage of Shakespeare, I
+should not hesitate to interpret it as characteristic
+of Tigranes' state of mind, disliking the very
+virtues, and therefore half-consciously representing
+them as mere products of the violence of the sex
+in general in all their whims, and yet forced to
+admire, and to feel and to express gratitude for,
+the exertion in his own instance. The inconsistency
+of the passage would be the consistency of the
+author. But this is above Beaumont and Fletcher.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='292'/><anchor id='Pg292'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Scornful Lady.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Sir Roger's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>Did I for this consume my <emph>quarters</emph> in meditations, vows, and
+woo'd her in heroical epistles? Did I expound the <hi rend='italic'>Owl</hi>,
+and undertake,
+with labour and expense, the recollection of those thousand
+pieces, consum'd in cellars and tobacco-shops, of that our honour'd
+Englishman, Nic. Broughton?</q> &amp;c.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+Strange, that neither Mr. Theobald nor Mr.
+Seward should have seen that this mock
+heroic speech is in full-mouthed blank verse!
+Had they seen this, they would have seen that
+<q>quarters</q> is a substitution of the players for
+<q>quires</q> or <q>squares,</q> (that is) of paper:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Consume my quires in meditations, vows,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And woo'd her in heroical epistles.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+They ought, likewise, to have seen that the
+abbreviated <q>Ni. Br.</q> of the text was properly
+<q>Mi. Dr.</q>&mdash;and that Michael Drayton, not
+Nicholas Broughton, is here ridiculed for his
+poem <hi rend='italic'>The Owl</hi> and his <hi rend='italic'>Heroical Epistles</hi>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Younger Loveless:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Fill him some wine. Thou dost not see me mov'd,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+These Editors ought to have learnt, that scarce
+an instance occurs in B. and F. of a long speech
+not in metre. This is plain staring blank verse.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='293'/><anchor id='Pg293'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Custom Of The Country.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+I cannot but think that in a country conquered
+by a nobler race than the natives, and
+in which the latter became villeins and bondsmen,
+this custom, <hi rend='italic'>lex merchetæ</hi>, may have been introduced
+for wise purposes,&mdash;as of improving the
+breed, lessening the antipathy of different races,
+and producing a new bond of relationship between
+the lord and the tenant, who, as the eldest born,
+would at least have a chance of being, and a probability
+of being thought, the lord's child. In
+the West Indies it cannot have these effects,
+because the mulatto is marked by nature different
+from the father, and because there is no bond, no
+law, no custom, but of mere debauchery.&mdash;1815.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Rutilio's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Yet if you play not fair play,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Evidently to be transposed, and read thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Yet if you play not fair, above-board too,</q></l>
+<l>I'll tell you what&mdash;</l>
+<l>I've a foolish engine here:&mdash;I say no more&mdash;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But if your Honour's guts are not enchanted.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Licentious as the comic metre of B. and F. is,&mdash;a
+far more lawless, and yet far less happy, imitation
+of the rhythm of animated talk in real life than
+Massinger's&mdash;still it is made worse than it really
+is by ignorance of the halves, thirds, and two-thirds
+of a line which B. and F. adopted from the
+<pb n='294'/><anchor id='Pg294'/>
+Italian and Spanish dramatists. Thus, in Rutilio's
+speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Though I confess</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Any man would desire to have her, and by any means,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Correct the whole passage,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Though I confess</q></l>
+<l>Any man would</l>
+<l>Desire to have her, and by any means,</l>
+<l>At any rate too, yet this common hangman</l>
+<l>That hath whipt off a thousănd măids heads already&mdash;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">That he should glean the harvest, sticks in my stomach!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In all comic metres the gulping of short syllables,
+and the abbreviation of syllables ordinarily long
+by the rapid pronunciation of eagerness and vehemence,
+are not so much a license as a law,&mdash;a
+faithful copy of nature, and let them be read
+characteristically, the times will be found nearly
+equal. Thus, the three words marked above make
+a <hi rend='italic'>choriambus</hi> -- u u,
+or perhaps a <hi rend='italic'>pæon primus</hi> - u u u;
+a dactyl, by virtue of comic rapidity,
+being only equal to an iambus when distinctly
+pronounced. I have no doubt that all B. and F.'s
+works might be safely corrected by attention to
+this rule, and that the editor is entitled to transpositions
+of all kinds, and to not a few omissions.
+For the rule of the metre once lost&mdash;what was to
+restrain the actors from interpolation?
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='295'/><anchor id='Pg295'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Elder Brother.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 2. Charles's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">For what concerns tillage,</q></l>
+<l>Who better can deliver it than Virgil</l>
+<l>In his Georgicks? and to cure your herds,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">His Bucolicks is a master-piece.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Fletcher was too good a scholar to fall into
+so gross a blunder, as Messrs. Sympson and
+Colman suppose. I read the passage thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">For what concerns tillage,</q></l>
+<l>Who better can deliver it than Virgil,</l>
+<l>In his Georgicks, <emph>or</emph> to cure your herds</l>
+<l><q rend="post">(His Bucolicks are a master-piece); but when,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Jealous of Virgil's honour, he is afraid lest, by
+referring to the <hi rend='italic'>Georgics</hi> alone, he might be understood
+as undervaluing the preceding work. <q>Not
+that I do not admire the <hi rend='italic'>Bucolics</hi> too, in their
+way.&mdash;But when,</q> &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 3. Charles's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 8">... <q rend="pre">She has a face looks like a
+<emph>story</emph>;</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">The <emph>story</emph> of the heavens looks very like her.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward reads <q>glory;</q> and Theobald quotes from
+Philaster:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>That reads the story of a woman's face.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I can make sense of this passage as little as Mr.
+Seward;&mdash;the passage from Philaster is nothing
+to the purpose. Instead of <q>a story,</q> I have
+sometimes thought of proposing <q>Astræa.</q>
+</p>
+
+<pb n='296'/><anchor id='Pg296'/>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Angellina's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">You're old and dim, Sir,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And the shadow of the earth eclips'd your judgment.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Inappropriate to Angellina, but one of the finest
+lines in our language.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 3. Charles's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">And lets the serious part of life run by</q></l>
+<l>As thin neglected sand, whiteness of name.</l>
+<l><q rend="post">You must be mine,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward's note, and reading:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 5">... <q rend="pre">Whiteness of name,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">You must be mine!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Nonsense! <q>Whiteness of name</q> is in apposition
+to <q>the serious part of life,</q> and means a
+deservedly pure reputation. The following line&mdash;<q>You
+<emph>must</emph> be mine!</q> means&mdash;<q>Though I do not
+enjoy you to-day, I shall hereafter, and without
+reproach.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Spanish Curate.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 7. Amaranta's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>And still I push'd him on, as he had been <emph>coming</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Perhaps the true word is <q>conning,</q>&mdash;that
+is, learning, or reading, and therefore
+inattentive.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='297'/><anchor id='Pg297'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Wit Without Money.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. Valentine's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>One without substance,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The present text, and that proposed by Seward,
+are equally vile. I have endeavoured to
+make the lines sense, though the whole is, I
+suspect, incurable except by bold conjectural reformation.
+I would read thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">One without substance of herself, that's woman;</q></l>
+<l>Without the pleasure of her life, that's wanton;</l>
+<l>Tho' she be young, forgetting it; tho' fair,</l>
+<l>Making her glass the eyes of honest men,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Not her own admiration.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>That's wanton,</q> or, <q>that is to say, wantonness.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Valentine's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Of half-a crown a week for pins and puppets.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<q>As there is a syllable wanting in the measure here.</q>&mdash;Seward.
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+A syllable wanting! Had this Seward neither
+ears nor fingers? The line is a more than usually
+regular iambic hendecasyllable.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">With one man satisfied, with one rein guided;</q></l>
+<l>With one faith, one content, one bed;</l>
+<l><emph>Aged</emph>, she makes the wife, preserves the fame and issue;</l>
+<l><q rend="post">A widow is,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Is <q>apaid</q>&mdash;contented&mdash;too obsolete for B. and
+F.? If not, we might read it thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Content with one faith, with one bed apaid,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">She makes the wife, preserves the fame and issue;</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<pb n='298'/><anchor id='Pg298'/>
+
+<p>
+Or, it may be,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q>with one breed apaid</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+that is, satisfied with one set of children, in
+opposition to,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>A widow is a Christmas-box,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Colman's note on Seward's attempt to put this
+play into metre.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The editors, and their contemporaries in general,
+were ignorant of any but the regular iambic verse.
+A study of the Aristophanic and Plautine metres
+would have enabled them to reduce B. and F.
+throughout into metre, except where prose is
+really intended.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='299'/><anchor id='Pg299'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Humorous Lieutenant.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Second Ambassador's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q rend="pre">When your angers,</q></l>
+<l><emph>Like</emph> so many brother billows, rose together,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And, curling up <emph>your</emph> foaming crests,
+defied,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This worse than superfluous <q>like</q> is very
+like an interpolation of some matter of fact
+critic&mdash;all <hi rend='italic'>pus, prose atque venenum</hi>. The <q>your</q>
+in the next line, instead of <q>their,</q> is likewise
+yours, Mr. Critic!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Timon's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Another of a new <emph>way</emph> will be look'd at.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<quote rend="display">
+<p>
+<q rend="pre">We must suspect the poets wrote, <q>of a new <emph>day</emph>.</q>
+So immediately after,</q>
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... Time may</l>
+<l><q rend="post">For all his wisdom, yet give us a day.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward's Note.
+</p>
+</quote>
+
+<p>
+For this very reason I more than suspect the
+contrary.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> sc. 3. Speech of Leucippe:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I'll put her into action for a <emph>wastcoat</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What we call a riding-habit,&mdash;some mannish
+dress.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='300'/><anchor id='Pg300'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Mad Lover.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. Masque of beasts:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">This goodly tree,</q></l>
+<l>An usher that still grew before his lady,</l>
+<l>Wither'd at root: this, for he could not woo,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">A grumbling lawyer:</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Here must have been omitted a line rhyming
+to <q>tree;</q> and the words of the next line
+have been transposed:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">This goodly tree,</q></l>
+<l><emph>Which leafless, and obscur'd with moss you see</emph>,</l>
+<l>An usher this, that 'fore his lady grew,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Wither'd at root: this, for he could not woo,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='301'/><anchor id='Pg301'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Loyal Subject.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+It is well worthy of notice, and yet has not been,
+I believe, noticed hitherto, what a marked
+difference there exists in the dramatic writers of
+the Elizabetho-Jacobæan age&mdash;(Mercy on me!
+what a phrase for <q>the writers during the reigns
+of Elizabeth and James I.!</q>)&mdash;in respect of their
+political opinions. Shakespeare, in this, as in all
+other things, himself and alone, gives the permanent
+politics of human nature, and the only
+predilection which appears, shows itself in his
+contempt of mobs and the populacy. Massinger
+is a decided Whig;&mdash;Beaumont and Fletcher high-flying,
+passive-obedience, Tories. The Spanish
+dramatists furnished them with this, as with
+many other ingredients. By the by, an accurate
+and familiar acquaintance with all the productions
+of the Spanish stage previously to 1620, is an
+indispensable qualification for an editor of B. and
+F.;&mdash;and with this qualification a most interesting
+and instructive edition might be given. This
+edition of Colman's (Stockdale, 1811) is below
+criticism.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In metre, B. and F. are inferior to Shakespeare,
+on the one hand, as expressing the poetic part of
+the drama, and to Massinger, on the other, in the
+art of reconciling metre with the natural rhythm
+of conversation,&mdash;in which, indeed, Massinger is
+<pb n='302'/><anchor id='Pg302'/>
+unrivalled. Read him aright, and measure by
+time, not syllables, and no lines can be more legitimate,&mdash;none
+in which the substitution of equipollent
+feet, and the modifications by emphasis,
+are managed with such exquisite judgment. B.
+and F. are fond of the twelve syllable (not
+Alexandrine) line, as:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Too many fears 'tis thought too: and to nourish those.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This has often a good effect, and is one of the
+varieties most common in Shakespeare.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='303'/><anchor id='Pg303'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Rule A Wife And Have A Wife.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. Old Woman's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">I fear he will knock my</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Brains out for lying.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Mr. Seward discards the words <q>for lying,</q>
+because <q>most of the things spoke of Estifania
+are true, with only a little exaggeration,
+and because they destroy all appearance of measure.</q>&mdash;Colman's
+note.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Mr. Seward had his brains out. The humour
+lies in Estifania's having ordered the Old Woman
+to tell these tales of her; for though an intriguer,
+she is not represented as other than chaste; and
+as to the metre, it is perfectly correct.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Marg.</hi> As you love me, give way.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Leon.</hi> It shall be better, I
+will give none, madam,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The meaning is:&mdash;<q>It shall be a better way,
+first;&mdash;as it is, I will not give it, or any that you
+in your present mood would wish.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='304'/><anchor id='Pg304'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Laws Of Candy.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. Speech of Melitus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Whose insolence and never yet match'd pride</q></l>
+<l>Can by no character be well express'd,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">But in her only name, the proud Erota.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Colman's note.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The poet intended no allusion to the word
+<q>Erota</q> itself; but says that her very name,
+<q>the proud Erota,</q> became a character and adage;&mdash;as
+we say, a Quixote or a Brutus: so to say an
+<q>Erota,</q> expressed female pride and insolence of
+beauty.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Speech of Antinous:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Of my peculiar honours, not deriv'd</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">From <emph>successary</emph>, but purchas'd with my blood.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The poet doubtless wrote <q>successry,</q> which,
+though not adopted in our language, would be, on
+many occasions, as here, a much more significant
+phrase than ancestry.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='305'/><anchor id='Pg305'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Little French Lawyer.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1. Dinant's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Are you become a patron too? 'Tis a new one,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">No more on't,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward reads:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Are you become a patron too? <emph>How long</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post"><emph>Have you been conning this speech?</emph> 'Tis a new one,</q>
+&amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+If conjectural emendation like this be allowed,
+we might venture to read:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Are you become a patron <emph>to a new tune</emph>?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+or,&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Are you become a patron? 'Tis a new <emph>tune</emph>.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Din.</hi> Thou wouldst not willingly</q></l>
+<l>Live a protested coward, or be call'd one?</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><hi rend='italic'>Cler.</hi> Words are but words.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post"><hi rend='italic'>Din.</hi> Nor wouldst thou take a blow?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward's note.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+O miserable! Dinant sees through Cleremont's
+gravity, and the actor is to explain it. <q>Words
+are but words,</q> is the last struggle of affected
+morality.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='306'/><anchor id='Pg306'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Valentinian.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 3.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is a real trial of charity to read this scene
+with tolerable temper towards Fletcher. So
+very slavish&mdash;so reptile&mdash;are the feelings and
+sentiments represented as duties. And yet, remember,
+he was a bishop's son, and the duty to
+God was the supposed basis.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Personals, including body, house, home, and
+religion;&mdash;property, subordination, and inter-community;&mdash;these
+are the fundamentals of
+society. I mean here, religion negatively taken,&mdash;so
+that the person be not compelled to do or
+utter, in relation of the soul to God, what would
+be, in that person, a lie;&mdash;such as to force a man
+to go to church, or to swear that he believes what
+he does not believe. Religion, positively taken,
+may be a great and useful privilege, but cannot
+be a right,&mdash;were it for this only, that it cannot
+be pre-defined. The ground of this distinction
+between negative and positive religion, as a social
+right, is plain. No one of my fellow-citizens is
+encroached on by my not declaring to him what I
+believe respecting the super-sensual; but should
+every man be entitled to preach against the
+preacher, who could hear any preacher? Now,
+it is different in respect of loyalty. There we
+have positive rights, but not negative rights;&mdash;for
+every pretended negative would be in effect a
+positive;&mdash;as if a soldier had a right to keep to
+<pb n='307'/><anchor id='Pg307'/>
+himself whether he would, or would not, fight.
+Now, no one of these fundamentals can be rightfully
+attacked, except when the guardian of it has
+abused it to subvert one or more of the rest. The
+reason is, that the guardian, as a fluent, is less
+than the permanent which he is to guard. He is
+the temporary and mutable mean, and derives his
+whole value from the end. In short, as robbery
+is not high treason, so neither is every unjust act
+of a king the converse. All must be attacked and
+endangered. Why? Because the king, as <hi rend='italic'>a</hi> to A,
+is a mean to A, or subordination, in a far higher
+sense than a proprietor, as <hi rend='italic'>b</hi> to A, is a mean to B,
+or property.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 2. Claudia's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Chimney-pieces!</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The whole of this speech seems corrupt; and if
+accurately printed,&mdash;that is, if the same in all the
+prior editions,&mdash;irremediable but by bold conjecture.
+<q><emph>Till</emph> my tackle,</q> should be, I think,
+<q><emph>While</emph>,</q> &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act iii. sc. 1. B. and F. always write as if
+virtue or goodness were a sort of talisman, or
+strange something, that might be lost without the
+least fault on the part of the owner. In short,
+their chaste ladies value their chastity as a material
+thing,&mdash;not as an act or state of being; and
+this mere thing being imaginary, no wonder that
+all their women are represented with the minds of
+strumpets, except a few irrational humourists, far
+less capable of exciting our sympathy than a
+Hindoo who has had a basin of cow-broth thrown
+over him;&mdash;for this, though a debasing superstition,
+is still real, and we might pity the poor
+<pb n='308'/><anchor id='Pg308'/>
+wretch, though we cannot help despising him.
+But B. and F.'s Lucinas are clumsy fictions. It
+is too plain that the authors had no one idea of
+chastity as a virtue, but only such a conception as
+a blind man might have of the power of seeing by
+handling an ox's eye. In <hi rend='italic'>The Queen of Corinth</hi>,
+indeed, they talk differently; but it is all talk,
+and nothing is real in it but the dread of losing a
+reputation. Hence the frightful contrast between
+their women (even those who are meant for virtuous)
+and Shakespeare's. So, for instance, <hi rend='italic'>The
+Maid in the Mill</hi>:&mdash;a woman must not merely have
+grown old in brothels, but have chuckled over
+every abomination committed in them with a
+rampant sympathy of imagination, to have had
+her fancy so drunk with the <hi rend='italic'>minutiæ</hi> of lechery as
+this icy chaste virgin evinces hers to have been.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It would be worth while to note how many of
+these plays are founded on rapes,&mdash;how many on
+incestuous passions, and how many on mere lunacies.
+Then their virtuous women are either crazy
+superstitions of a mere bodily negation of having
+been acted on, or strumpets in their imaginations
+and wishes, or, as in this <hi rend='italic'>Maid in the Mill</hi>, both at
+the same time. In the men, the love is merely
+lust in one direction,&mdash;exclusive preference of one
+object. The tyrant's speeches are mostly taken
+from the mouths of indignant denouncers of the
+tyrant's character, with the substitution of <q>I</q>
+for <q>he,</q>" and the omission of the prefatory <q>he
+acts as if he thought</q> so and so. The only feelings
+they can possibly excite are disgust at the
+Æciuses, if regarded as sane loyalists, or compassion
+if considered as Bedlamites. So much for
+their tragedies. But even their comedies are,
+<pb n='309'/><anchor id='Pg309'/>
+most of them, disturbed by the fantasticalness, or
+gross caricature, of the persons or incidents. There
+are few characters that you can really like (even
+though you should have erased from your mind
+all the filth which bespatters the most likeable of
+them, as Piniero in <hi rend='italic'>The Island Princess</hi>
+for instance),&mdash;scarcely
+one whom you can love. How
+different this from Shakespeare, who makes one
+have a sort of sneaking affection even for his
+Barnardines;&mdash;whose very Iagos and Richards
+are awful, and, by the counteracting power of
+profound intellects, rendered fearful rather than
+hateful;&mdash;and even the exceptions, as Goneril and
+Regan, are proofs of superlative judgment and the
+finest moral tact, in being left utter monsters,
+<hi rend='italic'>nulla virtute redemptæ</hi>, and in being kept out of
+sight as much as possible,&mdash;they being, indeed,
+only means for the excitement and deepening of
+noblest emotions towards the Lear, Cordelia, &amp;c.
+and employed with the severest economy! But
+even Shakespeare's grossness&mdash;that which is really
+so, independently of the increase in modern times
+of vicious associations with things indifferent (for
+there is a state of manners conceivable so pure,
+that the language of Hamlet at Ophelia's feet
+might be a harmless rallying, or playful teazing,
+of a shame that would exist in Paradise)&mdash;at the
+worst, how diverse in kind is it from Beaumont
+and Fletcher's! In Shakespeare it is the mere
+generalities of sex, mere words for the most
+part, seldom or never distinct images, all head-work,
+and fancy drolleries; there is no sensation
+supposed in the speaker. I need not proceed to
+contrast this with B. and F.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='310'/><anchor id='Pg310'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Rollo.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+This, perhaps, the most energetic of Fletcher's
+tragedies. He evidently aimed at a new
+Richard III. in Rollo;&mdash;but, as in all his other
+imitations of Shakespeare, he was not philosopher
+enough to bottom his original. Thus, in Rollo, he
+has produced a mere personification of outrageous
+wickedness, with no fundamental characteristic
+impulses to make either the tyrant's words or
+actions philosophically intelligible. Hence the
+most pathetic situations border on the horrible,
+and what he meant for the terrible, is either
+hateful, τὸ μισητὸν, or ludicrous. The scene of
+Baldwin's sentence in the third act is probably
+the grandest working of passion in all B. and F.'s
+dramas;&mdash;but the very magnificence of filial affection
+given to Edith, in this noble scene, renders
+the after scene (in imitation of one of the least
+Shakespearian of all Shakespeare's works, if it be
+his, the scene between Richard and Lady Anne)
+in which Edith is yielding to a few words and
+tears, not only unnatural, but disgusting. In
+Shakespeare, Lady Anne is described as a weak,
+vain, very woman throughout.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Gis.</hi> He is indeed the perfect character</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Of a good man, and so his actions speak him.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This character of Aubrey, and the whole spirit
+of this and several other plays of the same authors,
+<pb n='311'/><anchor id='Pg311'/>
+are interesting as traits of the morals which it was
+fashionable to teach in the reigns of James I. and
+his successor, who died a martyr to them. Stage,
+pulpit, law, fashion,&mdash;all conspired to enslave the
+realm. Massinger's plays breathe the opposite
+spirit; Shakespeare's the spirit of wisdom which is
+for all ages. By the by, the Spanish dramatists&mdash;Calderon,
+in particular,&mdash;had some influence in
+this respect, of romantic loyalty to the greatest
+monsters, as well as in the busy intrigues of B.
+and F.'s plays.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Wildgoose Chase.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1. Belleur's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l>... <q rend="pre">That wench, methinks,</q></l>
+<l>If I were but well set on, for she is a <emph>fable</emph>,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">If I were but hounded right, and one to teach me.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Sympson reads <q>affable,</q> which Colman rejects,
+and says, <q>the next line seems to
+enforce</q> the reading in the text.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Pity, that the editor did not explain wherein
+the sense, <q>seemingly enforced by the next line,</q>
+consists. May the true word be <q>a sable</q>&mdash;that
+is, a black fox, hunted for its precious fur?
+Or <q>at-able,</q>&mdash;as we now say,&mdash;<q>she is come-at-able?</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='312'/><anchor id='Pg312'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>A Wife For A Month.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 1. Alphonso's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Betwixt the cold bear and the raging lion</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Lies my safe way.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Seward's note and alteration to&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>'Twixt the cold bears, far from the raging lion</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+This Mr. Seward is a blockhead of the provoking
+species. In his itch for correction, he
+forgot the words&mdash;<q>lies my safe way!</q> The bear
+is the extreme pole, and thither he would travel
+over the space contained between it and <q>the
+raging lion.</q>
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Pilgrim.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act iv. sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Alinda's interview with her father is lively,
+and happily hit off; but this scene with
+Roderigo is truly excellent. Altogether, indeed,
+this play holds the first place in B. and F.'s
+romantic entertainments, <hi rend='italic'>Lustspiele</hi>, which collectively
+are their happiest performances, and are
+only inferior to the romance of Shakespeare in the
+<hi rend='italic'>As You Like It</hi>, <hi rend='italic'>Twelfth Night</hi>, &amp;c.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi>&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre"><hi rend='italic'>Alin.</hi> To-day you shall wed Sorrow,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">And Repentance will come to-morrow.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read <q>Penitence,</q> or else&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Repentance, she will come to-morrow.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='313'/><anchor id='Pg313'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Queen Of Corinth.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. sc. 1.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Merione's speech. Had the scene of this
+tragi-comedy been laid in Hindostan instead
+of Corinth, and the gods here addressed been the
+Vishnu and Co. of the Indian Pantheon, this rant
+would not have been much amiss.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In respect of style and versification, this play and
+the following of <hi rend='italic'>Bonduca</hi> may be taken as the best,
+and yet as characteristic, specimens of Beaumont
+and Fletcher's dramas. I particularly instance
+the first scene of the <hi rend='italic'>Bonduca</hi>. Take Shakespeare's
+<hi rend='italic'>Richard II.</hi>, and having selected some one scene of
+about the same number of lines, and consisting
+mostly of long speeches, compare it with the first
+scene in <hi rend='italic'>Bonduca</hi>,&mdash;not for the idle purpose of
+finding out which is the better, but in order to see
+and understand the difference. The latter, that of
+B. and F., you will find a well-arranged bed of
+flowers, each having its separate root, and its
+position determined aforehand by the will of the
+gardener,&mdash;each fresh plant a fresh volition. In
+the former you see an Indian fig-tree, as described
+by Milton;&mdash;all is growth, evolution;&mdash;each
+line, each word almost, begets the following,
+and the will of the writer is an interfusion, a
+continuous agency, and not a series of separate
+acts. Shakespeare is the height, breadth, and
+depth of Genius: Beaumont and Fletcher the
+excellent mechanism, in juxta-position and succession,
+of talent.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='314'/><anchor id='Pg314'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Noble Gentleman.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Why have the dramatists of the times of
+Elizabeth, James I., and the first Charles
+become almost obsolete, with the exception of
+Shakespeare? Why do they no longer belong to
+the English, being once so popular? And why is
+Shakespeare an exception?&mdash;One thing, among
+fifty, necessary to the full solution is, that they all
+employed poetry and poetic diction on unpoetic
+subjects, both characters and situations, especially
+in their comedy. Now Shakespeare is all, all ideal,&mdash;of
+no time, and therefore for all times. Read,
+for instance, Marine's panegyric in the first scene
+of this play:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Know</q></l>
+<l>The eminent court, to them that can be wise,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">And fasten on her blessings, is a sun,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+What can be more unnatural and inappropriate
+(not only is, but must be felt as such) than such
+poetry in the mouth of a silly dupe? In short,
+the scenes are mock dialogues, in which the poet
+<hi rend='italic'>solus</hi> plays the ventriloquist, but cannot keep down
+his own way of expressing himself. Heavy complaints
+have been made respecting the transposing
+of the old plays by Cibber; but it never occurred
+to these critics to ask, how it came that no one
+ever attempted to transpose a comedy of Shakespeare's.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='315'/><anchor id='Pg315'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Coronation.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. Speech of Seleucus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Altho' he be my enemy, should any</q></l>
+<l>Of the gay flies that buz about the court,</l>
+<l><emph>Sit</emph> to catch trouts i' the summer, tell me so,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">I durst,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Colman's note.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Pshaw! <q>Sit</q> is either a misprint for <q>set,</q>
+or the old and still provincial word for <q>set,</q>
+as the participle passive of <q>seat</q> or <q>set.</q> I
+have heard an old Somersetshire gardener say:&mdash;<q>Look,
+Sir! I set these plants here; those yonder
+I <emph>sit</emph> yesterday.</q>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Speech of Arcadius:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Nay, some will swear they love their mistress,</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">Would hazard lives and fortunes,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Nay, some will swear they love their mistress so,</q></l>
+<l>They would hazard lives and fortunes to preserve</l>
+<l>One of her hairs brighter than Berenice's,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Or young Apollo's; and yet, after this,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<q>Thĕy woŭld hāzard</q>&mdash;furnishes an anapæst for
+an <hi rend='italic'>iambus</hi>. <q>And yet,</q> which must be read,
+<hi rend='italic'>anyĕt</hi>, is an instance of the enclitic force in an
+accented monosyllable. <q>And yēt,</q> is a complete
+<hi rend='italic'>iambus</hi>; but <hi rend='italic'>anyet</hi> is,
+like <hi rend='italic'>spirit</hi>, a dibrach u u,
+trocheized, however, by the <hi rend='italic'>arsis</hi> or first accent
+damping, though not extinguishing, the second.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='316'/><anchor id='Pg316'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>Wit At Several Weapons.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. Oldcraft's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>I'm arm'd at all points,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+It would be very easy to restore all this passage
+to metre, by supplying a sentence of four
+syllables, which the reasoning almost demands,
+and by correcting the grammar. Read thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="pre">Arm'd at all points 'gainst treachery, I hold</q></l>
+<l>My humour firm. If, living, I can see thee</l>
+<l>Thrive by thy wits, I shall have the more courage,</l>
+<l>Dying, to trust thee with my lands. If not,</l>
+<l>The best wit, I can hear of, carries them.</l>
+<l>For since so many in my time and knowledge,</l>
+<l>Rich children of the city, have concluded</l>
+<l><emph>For lack of wit</emph> in beggary, I'd rather</l>
+<l>Make a wise stranger my executor,</l>
+<l>Than a fool son my heir, and have my lands call'd</l>
+<l><q rend="post">After my wit than name: and that's my nature!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Oldcraft's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>To prevent which I have sought out a match for her.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>Which to prevent I've sought a match out for her.</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>Ib.</hi> Sir Gregory's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre"><emph>Do you think</emph></q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">I'll have any of the wits hang upon me after I am married once?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+Read it thus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Do you think</q></l>
+<l>That I'll have any of the wits to hang</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Upon me after I am married once?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+and afterwards&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 9">... <q rend="pre">Is it a fashion in London</q></l>
+<l><q rend="post">To marry a woman, and to never see her?</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+The superfluous <q>to</q> gives it the Sir Andrew
+Ague-cheek character.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='317'/><anchor id='Pg317'/>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Fair Maid Of The Inn.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act ii. Speech of Albertus:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">But, Sir,</q></l>
+<l>By my life, I vow to take assurance from you,</l>
+<l>That right hand never more shall strike my son,</l>
+</lg>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q rend="post">Chop his hand off!</q></l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+In this (as, indeed, in all other respects, but
+most in this) it is that Shakespeare is so incomparably
+superior to Fletcher and his friend,&mdash;in
+judgment! What can be conceived more unnatural
+and motiveless than this brutal resolve?
+How is it possible to feel the least interest in
+Albertus afterwards? or in Cesario after his
+conduct?
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Two Noble Kinsmen.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+On comparing the prison scene of <hi rend='italic'>Palamon and
+Arcite</hi>, act ii. sc. 2, with the dialogue between
+the same speakers, act i. sc. 2, I can
+scarcely retain a doubt as to the first act's having
+been written by Shakespeare. Assuredly it was
+not written by B. and F. I hold Jonson more
+probable than either of these two.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The main presumption, however, for Shakespeare's
+share in this play rests on a point, to
+which the sturdy critics of this edition (and indeed
+all before them) were blind,&mdash;that is, the construction
+of the blank verse, which proves beyond all
+doubt an intentional imitation, if not the proper
+hand, of Shakespeare. Now, whatever improbability
+<pb n='318'/><anchor id='Pg318'/>
+there is in the former (which supposes
+Fletcher conscious of the inferiority, the too
+poematic <hi rend='italic'>minus</hi>-dramatic nature of his versification,
+and of which, there is neither proof nor likelihood)
+adds so much to the probability of the
+latter. On the other hand, the harshness of
+many of these very passages, a harshness unrelieved
+by any lyrical inter-breathings, and still
+more the want of profundity in the thoughts, keep
+me from an absolute decision.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 3. Emilia's speech:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l rend="margin-left: 10">... <q rend="pre">Since his depart, his
+<emph>sports</emph></q>,</l>
+<l><q rend="post">Tho' craving seriousness and skill,</q> &amp;c.</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+I conjecture <q>imports,</q>&mdash;that is, duties or offices
+of importance. The flow of the versification in
+this speech seems to demand the trochaic ending - u;
+while the text blends jingle and <emph>hisses</emph> to
+the annoyance of less sensitive ears than Fletcher's&mdash;not
+to say, Shakespeare's.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div>
+<index index="toc"/>
+<index index="pdf"/>
+<head><q>The Woman Hater.</q></head>
+
+<p>
+Act i. sc. 2.&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This scene from the beginning is prose printed
+as blank verse, down to the line&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<lg>
+<l><q>E'en all the valiant stomachs in the court</q>&mdash;</l>
+</lg>
+
+<p>
+where the verse recommences. This transition
+from the prose to the verse enhances, and indeed
+forms the comic effect. Lazarillo concludes his
+soliloquy with a hymn to the goddess of plenty.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+THE END.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<pb n='319'/><anchor id='Pg319'/>
+
+<div>
+<head>Advertisement.</head>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='italic'>NEW EDITION, REVISED.</hi>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+AIDS TO REFLECTION
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>In the Formation of a Manly Character, on the several
+grounds of Prudence, Morality, and Religion.</hi>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>By</hi> S. T. COLERIDGE.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>With a copious Index to the Work, and Translations of
+the Greek and Latin Quotations.</hi>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<hi rend='smallcaps'>By</hi> THOMAS FENBY.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+400 pp. <hi rend='italic'>Fscp. 8vo, cloth extra</hi>, 3/6.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+EDWARD HOWELL, PUBLISHER, LIVERPOOL
+</p>
+
+<p>
+MDCCCLXXIV.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+</body>
+<back rend="page-break-before: right">
+ <div rend="page-break-before: right">
+ <divGen type="pgfooter" />
+ </div>
+</back>
+</text>
+</TEI.2>