diff options
Diffstat (limited to '25354.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 25354.txt | 8101 |
1 files changed, 8101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/25354.txt b/25354.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..06d2ae5 --- /dev/null +++ b/25354.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8101 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Assimilative Memory, by +Marcus Dwight Larrowe (AKA Prof. A. Loisette) + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Assimilative Memory + or, How to Attend and Never Forget + +Author: Marcus Dwight Larrowe (AKA Prof. A. Loisette) + +Release Date: May 6, 2008 [EBook #25354] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ASSIMILATIVE MEMORY *** + + + + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + | | + | TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE | + | | + | In this plain text version, small capitals have been | + | rendered as ALL CAPS, bold using =equals signs= and italics | + | _usually using underscores_. However, the original used | + | italics to highlight certain letters within words where | + | these were intended to help with remembering numbers and | + | dates according to the "Analytic substitution" memory | + | method. For legibility, these have been rendered using | + | {c}u{rl}y {br}ac{k}e{ts}. | + | | + | Some of the numbered lists were originally wrapped together | + | as a paragraph; for legibility some of these have been | + | changed to separate lines. This applies particularly to the | + | lists of questions: these blocks were originally placed like | + | footnotes at the bottom of pages, but here have been moved | + | to an appropriate break in the main text. | + | | + | Some obvious printer errors have been corrected, full | + | details of which can be found in the HTML version of this | + | eBook. The inconsistent hyphenation of several words, and | + | inconsistent use of -ise and -ize spellings, has been left | + | as in the original. | + | | + | | + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + + +[Illustration: [Handwritten: A. LOISETTE] + +(MARCUS DWIGHT LARROWE)] + + + + + ASSIMILATIVE MEMORY + + OR + + HOW TO ATTEND AND NEVER FORGET + + + BY + + PROF. A. LOISETTE + + + + FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY + NEW YORK AND LONDON + 1899 + + + + + COPYRIGHT, 1896, BY + IDA M. LARROWE-LOISETTE + + _All Rights Reserved_ + + + + ENTERED AT STATIONER'S HALL, 1896. + _All Rights Reserved._ + + + + _Printed in the United States of America._ + + + + +PREFACE. + + +Prof. A. Loisette wishes to call the attention of those who are now for +the first time becoming acquainted with his System of Memory Training, +that he was the first teacher of a Memory System to announce and to +insist that Memory is not a _separate faculty_ whose office it is to +carry the recollective burdens of the other faculties--but that Memory +is a Physiological and Psychological property of each mental act, and +that such act retains the traces and history of its own action, and that +there are as many memories as there are kinds of mental action, and +that, therefore, Memory is always concrete, although, for convenience +sake, we do speak of it in the abstract, and that consequently all +Memory improvement means _improvement of the Action_ or _Manner_ of +action of the Mental powers, and that what he imparts is the right way +to USE the Intellect and Attention--and that hence his System does make +and must make better observers, clearer and more consecutive thinkers, +and sounder reasoners as well as surer rememberers; that in short the +fundamental principle of his System is Learn by Thinking, and that his +achievements as a mind-trainer are completed when he has helped the +student of his System to acquire the Habit of Attention and the Habit of +Thinking on that to which he is attending on all occasions, which two +Habits combined constitute the Habit of Assimilation, and that when this +Habit of Assimilation is thus established in the pupil's mind, the +System as such is no longer consciously used. + + + + +TABLE OF CONTENTS. + + + PAGE + + 1--FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF ASSIMILATIVE MEMORY. 1 + + 2--BRAIN TONIC; or, The stimulating Power of the Method. 6 + + 3--Educating the Intellect to stay with the senses of + Sight and Hearing; or, Cure of Mind Wandering. 15 + + 4--Learning any Series of Proper Names--American + Presidents. 25 + + 5--The Unique Case of the English Sovereigns--How to learn + their Succession quickly. 31 + + 6--NUMERIC THINKING; or, Learning the longest sets of + figures almost instantly. 38 + + 7--DECOMPOSITION OR RECOMPOSITION, AND INTELLECTUAL + INQUISITION; or, How to learn Prose and Poetry by + heart, with numerous examples, including Poe's Bells. 47 + + 8--ANALYTIC SUBSTITUTIONS; or, A Quick Training in Dates, + etc., Dates of the Accession of American Presidents + and of the English Kings, Specific Gravities, Rivers, + Mountains, Latitudes and Longitudes, etc. 66 + + 9--THOUGHTIVE UNIFICATIONS; or, How to never forget Proper + Names, Series of Facts, Faces, Errands, Conversations, + Speeches or Lectures, Languages, Foreign Vocabularies, + Music, Mathematics, etc., Speaking without notes, + Anatomy, and all other Memory wants. 109 + + 10--ACME OF ACQUISITION; or, Learning unconnected facts, + rules and principles in the Arts, Sciences, Histories, + etc., etc., chapters in books, or books themselves, in + one reading or study. 149 + + 11--Learning one hundred facts in the Victorian Era, with + dates of year, month, and day of each in one + thoughtive perusal. 159 + + + + +ASSIMILATIVE MEMORY. + + + + +FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES. + + +What is the basic principle of my system? It is, _Learn_ by _Thinking_. +What is _Attention_? It is the will directing the activity of the +_intellect_ into some particular channel _and keeping it there_. It is +the opposite of mind-wandering. What is thinking? It consists in +_finding relations_ between the objects of thought with an _immediate +awareness_ of those relations. + +What is the Sensuous memory? It is association through the eye or ear of +a _succession_ of sights or sounds without any reflection or +consideration of the units of the succession, or what they stand for, or +represent. It is learning by _rote_--mere repetition--mere brainless or +thoughtless repetition--a mode of learning that is not lasting--and +always causes or promotes mind-wandering. + +What is Assimilative memory? It is the _habit_ of so _receiving_ and +_absorbing_ impressions or ideas that they or their representatives +shall be _ready for revival or recall whenever wanted_. It is learning +through relations--by thinking--from grasping the ideas or thoughts--the +meaning and the comprehension of the subject matter. This mode of +learning promotes attention and prevents mind-wandering. + +What are the two stages of the Memory? Let me illustrate: Last week, +month, or year you saw a military procession pass along the streets. +Note how your mind was affected. Into your eyes went impressions as to +the number composing the procession, their style of costume or dress, +the orderliness or otherwise of their march, the shape and form of the +musical instruments in the hands of the band, and the appearance of the +officer in charge on horseback. Into your ears went impressions of the +sound of the tramp and tread of the soldiers, the tune played by the +band, and any commands uttered by the officer. These impressions +commingling in your brain made up your experience of the passing of the +procession--your first and only experience of it at _that_ time. I call +this the First Stage of the Memory--the stage of the _First Impression_, +which is always the precursor of the Second Stage. + +What is the Second Stage of the Memory? This moment you recall what? Not +the procession itself; for it is no longer in existence. You saw and +heard it then, but you do not see or hear it now. You only recall the +impression left upon your mind by the procession. A ray of Consciousness +is passed over that impression and you re-read it, you re-awaken the +record. This is the Second Stage of the Memory--the _revival_ of the +previous experience--the recall to consciousness of the First +Impression. The First Impression with no power to revive it afterward, +gives no memory. However great the power of Revival, there is no memory +unless there was a First Impression. There are three conditions of +memory--(1) Impression. (2) Its Preservation. (3) Its Revival. We are +mainly concerned here with the Impression and its Revival. + +There are (_five_) kinds of memories rising from the natural aptitudes +of different individuals--(1) First Impressions are apt to be feeble and +the power to revive them weak--a poor memory. (2) First Impressions are +usually weak but the power to revive them is strong--still a poor +memory. (3) First Impressions are usually vivid but the power to revive +them is weak--a poor memory. (4) First Impressions on all subjects are +strong and the power to revive them is strong--a first-class memory. (5) +First Impressions in some particulars are very strong and the reviving +power in regard to them is very strong--a good memory for these +particulars, or a memory good for mathematics, or music, or faces, or +reciting, or languages, &c., but usually weak in most other respects. + +SINCE WE ARE TO LEARN BY THINKING WE MUST AT THE OUTSET LEARN THE +DEFINITION OF THE THREE LAWS OF THINKING. + + +THREE LAWS OF MEMORY OR OF THINKING. + +_The first and principal thing the pupil requires to do in this lesson +after learning the definition of the following Three Laws--is to be able +to clearly understand the examples under each Law, and whether they +verify or illustrate that Law._ + +I. INCLUSION indicates that there is an _overlapping_ of _meaning_ + between two words, or that there is a _prominent idea_ or _sound_ + that belongs to both alike, or that a similar fact or property + belongs to two events or things as, to enumerate a few + classes:-- + + WHOLE AND PART.--(Earth, Poles.) (Ship, Rudder.) (Forest, Trees.) + (Air, Oxygen.) (House, Parlor.) (Clock, Pendulum.) + (Knife, Blade.) (India, Punjab.) (14, 7.) (24, 12.) + + GENUS AND SPECIES.--(Animal, Man.) (Plant, Thyme.) (Fish, Salmon.) + (Tree, Oak.) (Game, Pheasant.) (Dog, Retriever.) (Universal + Evolution, Natural Selection.) (Silver Lining, Relief of + Lucknow.) (Empress Queen, Victoria.) (Money, Cash.) + + ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE.--[The same Quality appears both in the + Adjective and in the Substantive.]--(Dough, Soft.) + (Empty, Drum.) (Lion, Strong.) (Eagle, Swift.) (Courage, Hero.) + (Glass, Smoothness.) (Gold, Ductility.) (Sunshine, Light.) + (Fire, Warmth.) + + SIMILARITY OF SOUND.--(Emperor, Empty.) (Salvation, Salamander.) + (Hallelujah, Hallucination.) (Cat, Catastrophe.) (Top, Topsy.) + [Inclusion by sound is not punning.] + + SIMPLE INCLUSION embraces cases not found in either of the + foregoing classes, but where there is _something in common_ + between the pairs, as (Church, Temple.) (Pocket, Black Hole.) + +II. EXCLUSION means _Antithesis_. One word excludes the other, or both + words relate to one and the same thing, but occupy opposite + positions in regard to it, as (Riches, Poverty.) (Hot, Cold.) + (Old, Young.) (Damp, Dry.) (Life, Death.) (Love, Hate.) + (Joy, Sorrow.) (Courage, Cowardice.) (Health, Sickness.) + (Righteous, Wicked.) (Beauty, Ugliness.) (Peace, War.) + +III. CONCURRENCE is the sequence or co-existence of impressions or + ideas that have been either accidentally or causally together.--It + is either the accidental conjunction of experiences or the + operation of cause and effect; since even in the latter case, it + is merely the sensuous facts of immediate succession that we know + about, as (Gravitation, Newton, Apple.) (Dives, Lazarus, + Abraham, Bosom.) (Pipe, Tobacco.) (Michaelmas, Goose.) + (Columbus, America.) (Bartholomew Diaz, Cape of Good Hope.) + (Grandmother, Knitting.) (Socrates, Hemlock.) (Bruce, Spider.) + (Nelson, Trafalgar.) (Demosthenes, Seashore, Stammering, Pebbles.) + (Job, Patience.) (Wedding, Slippers, Cake.) (Wellington, Bonaparte, + Waterloo.) (Depression, Fall of Silver.) (Lightning, Thunder.) + +[In the case of the following pairs, one word has been so often +appropriated to the other, that there seems to be something in common in +the meaning of the terms--but it is not so, they are mere cases of +Concurrence, but of almost indissoluble Concurrence. For instance, a man +might examine a "spade" in all its parts and might even make one after a +model, and not even know what "dig" means. The mention of "dig" is as +likely to make us think of pickaxe as of spade. "Spade" does not mean +"dig," nor does "dig" mean spade. "Dig" merely means the _action_ of the +"spade," or the _use_ to which it is put. Hence this pair of words does +not furnish an example of Inclusion. But as "dig" is frequently +appropriated to "spade"--as we have often thought of those words +together--this is a case of strong Concurrence. The term "swoop" is +almost exclusively applied to "eagle." A certain action or movement of +the eagle is termed swooping. But "eagle" does not mean "swoop," nor +does "swoop" mean "eagle." We always think of "eagle" when we think of +"swoop," but we do not often think of "swoop" when we think of "eagle." +It is not In., but Con.] + +(Spade, Dig.) (Razor, Shaving.) (Coffin, Burial.) (Chair, Sitting.) +(Scythe, Cut.) (Sword, Wound.) (Pen, Write.) (Ears, Hearing.) +(Road, Travel.) (Food, Eating.) (Paper, Write.) (Wine, Drink.) +(Worm, Crawl.) (Bird, Fly.) (Eagle, Swoop.) (Hawk, Hover.) (Ram, Butt.) +(Teeth, Gnash.) (Wheel, Turn.) + + + + +THE BRAIN TONIC EFFECT OF THE LAWS OF MEMORY RIGHTLY APPLIED. + + +FIRST LAW OF MEMORY. + + =Building.= } In. by G. & S. + =Dwelling.= } + +If we examine the _meaning_ of these two words--Building and Dwelling, +we find that both indicate _structures made by man_. This idea is +_common_ to both. Now when we find that two words express the same +thought, either completely or partially, we say that it is a case of +Inclusion, because the pair of words contains or includes the same idea. +Inclusion is the first law of memory. + +There are several kinds of Inclusion. What variety have we here? Let us +see. Building applies to many kinds of structures; _house_, _stable_, +_church_, _depot_, _store_, etc. It is applicable to all of these in a +general way, but it designates none of them. But dwelling means a +_special_ kind of structure--_a building occupied by man_--a place to +live in. This pair of words therefore illustrates Inclusion by Genus and +Species, indicated by the abridgement, In. G. & S. or simply by In. +Other examples: "Planet, Mars;" "Mountain, Vesuvius;" "River, +Mississippi;" "Building Material, Potsdam Sandstone;" "Fruit, Peaches." + +We may for convenience include in this class, cases of the Genus and the +_Individual_ as "Man and George Washington;" "Judge, Hon. John Gibson;" +"New Yorker, Hon. W. W. Astor;" and cases of Species and the Individual, +as, "Frenchman and Guizot;" "American, Abraham Lincoln." And also +Co-equal Species under a common Genus, as under "Receiver" we may +include "Can" and "Bin"--under carnivorous birds we may include the +Eagle and the Hawk. "Head-Covering, Hat, Cap;" "Hand-covering, Gloves, +Mittens;" "Foot-covering, Boot, Shoe." + + =Dwelling.= } Synonymous In. + =House.= } + +_Inhabitability by man_ is the thought common to both of these words. +Being _nearly alike_ in meaning, we call them a case of Synonymous +Inclusion, indicated by "Syn. In." Other cases: "Near, Close to;" +"Likeness, Resemblance;" "Lift, Raise;" "Meaning, Signification;" "John, +Jack;" "James, Jim;" "Elizabeth, Bessy;" "Margaret, Maggy;" "Gertrude, +Gertie;" "Ellen, Nellie." + + =House.= } In. by Whole & Part. + =Parlor.= } + +Another case of Inclusion. House is the whole containing as it does +the _parlor_, _dining-room_, _kitchen_, _bedroom_, etc. Parlor is a +_part_ of the whole house. Hence this pair of words illustrates +Inclusion by Whole & Part designated by In. W. & P., or merely by In. We +may include in this class for convenience _the material and the product_ +as "Bureau, Oak;" "Tower, Brick;" "Harness, Leather." Other cases: +"Wagon, Wheel;" "Razor, Blade;" "Table, Legs;" "United States of North +America, New York;" "State, County;" "City, Street;" "Bird, Feathers;" +"Year, Month;" "Week, Sunday;" "Engine, Boiler;" "100, 50;" "10, 5," &c. + + =PARlor.= } In. by S. & s. + =PARtridge.= } + +Here we see that there is nothing in common in the _meaning_ of the +words, but there is the syllable "Par" belonging to both alike. It is +the same in _spelling_ in both words, and virtually the same in +_pronunciation_, the same by Sight and by sound, represented by In. by +capital S for In. by sight, and In. by small s for In. by sound, or +merely by In. Examples: "Nice, Gneiss;" "Pole, Polarity;" +"Popular, Popgun;" "Jeffer_son_, Madi_son_." + + =Partridge.= } In. by W. & P. + =Feathers.= } + +Partridge is the name of the bird and feathers constitute _part_ of the +Partridge. Other cases: "Coat, Buttons;" "Elephant, Trunk;" +"Bottle, Neck;" "Pen, Nib;" "South Africa, Cape Colony." + + =Feathers.= } In. by A. & C. + =Light.= } + +Feathers are _things_ perceived by touch and sight. They imply the +quality of _lightness_, but say nothing about that quality. Light has +several meanings. Here taken in connection with feathers, it means +nearly destitute of weight, or the quality of lightness. It is an +abstract term that describes an attribute, but feathers are things and +therefore concrete. Hence the pair of words illustrate Inclusion by +Abstract and Concrete, and is indicated by In. by A. and C., or merely +by In. Other examples: "Sour, Vinegar;" "Sweet, Sugar;" "Coward, Fear;" +"Swiftness, Express train," &c. + + =LIGHT.= } In. by S. & s. + =LIGHTerman.= } + +As before remarked, "Light" has several meanings. Here it means that +which _enables us to see_. "Lighterman" is the man who works upon a boat +called a "Lighter." There is nothing in common in the meaning of this +pair of words, but the word or syllable "Light" belongs to both alike. +It is In. by Sight and sound. Other cases: "Dark, Darkness;" +"Starch, March;" "Rage, Forage;" "Barber, Barbarism," &c. + + =LighterMAN.= } In. by S. + =Lord MANsfield.= } + +Here the word or syllable "man" appears in both cases. In the former it +signifies the man that manages a Lighter, and in the latter it was +primitively connected with Field, as "A Man's Field." After a time it +became Mansfield. It is a perfect case of In. by S. and s. Other cases: +"Tempest, Temperature;" "Antepenult, Antediluvians." + + =Lord MansFIELD.= } In. by S. & s. + =FIELDhand.= } + +As "Field" belongs to both words, it is a case of perfect In. by S. and +s. Other cases: "Regiment, Compliment;" "Sell, Selfish;" +"Miniature, Mint," &c. + +Now let the pupil read over very thoughtfully the ten words just +examined, and _recall_ the _relation_ which we found to exist between +every pair of them. + + Building. + Dwelling. + House. + Parlor. + Partridge. + Feathers. + Light. + Lighterman. + Lord Mansfield. + Fieldhand. + +Having finished the reading, let the pupil close the lesson, or put it +out of sight and endeavour to recall the ten words from Building to +Fieldhand from memory. He will find no difficulty in doing so. He +learned the series by heart without any suspicion that he was committing +it to memory. + +Now let him realise how he did this. It was because he made use of the +cementing Laws of the Memory. He sought out and found the relations +between the words. By _thinking_ of those relations, he _exercised_ his +intellect on those words in a double way--the _meaning_ and the _sound_ +of the words were considered and then the _similarities_ of meaning and +of sound were noticed. A vivid _First Impression_ was thus received from +the words themselves and from the relations between them and an easy and +certain recall thereby assured. + +Now _recall_ the series in an inverse order, beginning with "Fieldhand," +and going back to "Building." You do it easily, because each word was +cemented to its predecessor and its successor, and hence it makes no +difference whether you go forward or backward. When, however, you learn +by _rote_ you know the task as you learned it, and not in the reverse +way. Before proceeding, repeat the ten words from memory, from +"Building" to "Fieldhand," and the reverse way, at least five times; +each time, if possible, more rapidly than before. These repetitions are +not to _learn_ the series; for this has been done already, but it is to +consolidate the effect of learning it in the right way. + + +SECOND LAW OF MEMORY. + + =Fieldhand.= } Ex. + =Millionnaire.= } + +A fieldhand is a labourer who lives by the sweat of his brow, and eats +not what he does not earn. A Millionnaire is at the opposite pole, and +can have a superabundance of all things. It is a case of opposition. +_Where two ideas pertain to one and the same idea, but occupy opposite +relations in regard to it, it is a case of Exclusion._ The means of +subsistence is the common idea and Fieldhand and Millionnaire occupy +opposite positions in respect to that idea. Other examples: "Upper, +Under;" "Above, Beneath;" "Before, After;" "Entrance, Exit;" "Appear, +Vanish;" "Cheap, Dear;" "Empty, Full;" "Col. Ingersoll, Talmage;" +"Washington, Arnold;" "Minnehaha, Minneboohoo." + + =Millionnaire.= } Ex. + =Pauper.= } + +Here is opposition between millionnaire and pauper. It is a case of Ex. +Other examples: "Superfluity, Scarcity;" "Fertile, Barren;" "Sorrow, +Happiness;" "Straight, Crooked;" "Irregular, Circle;" "Prompt, Tardy;" +"Liberal, Stingy;" "Wide, Narrow;" "Open, Shut;" "Inclusion, Exclusion;" +"Beginning, End;" "Industry, Idleness;" "Addition, Subtraction;" +"Infernal, Celestial;" "Cellar, Garret;" "Miser, Spend-thrift;" +"Assimilation, Learning by _rote_," &c. + + =Pauper.= } Ex. + =Wealth.= } + +Here is the extreme of opposition. The state or condition of destitution +of the pauper is contrasted with the state or condition of being over +supplied. Other examples: "Insufficient, Enough;" "Work, Play;" "Crying, +Laughing;" "Awkward, Graceful;" "In, Out;" "East, West;" "North, South;" +"Saint, Sinner;" "Fast, Slow," &c. + + =WEALTH.= } In. by S. & s. + =CommonWEALTH.= } + +If "Wealth" is taken as "Private" or individual, and "Commonwealth" be +taken in its derivative sense, as "wealth in common," or, the "public +wealth," then this would be a case of Exclusion. If "Wealth" is taken +as the condition of great abundance, and "Commonwealth" as the political +body, known as a State, then this is a case of Inclusion by sight, or by +sound, the word "wealth" belonging to both alike. + + =COMMONwealth.= } Ex. + =UNcommon.= } + +Considering "Common" in relation with "Uncommon" we have Exclusion. In +the previous pair, we used wealth of commonwealth to make a relation +with the simple word wealth. Here we use the first two syllables of the +word to contrast with _un_common. + + =Uncommon.= } Syn. Inclusion. + =Rare.= } + +These words are nearly _alike in meaning_. Other examples: "Choice, +Preference;" "Resolute, Determined;" "Economical, Frugal;" "Ugly, +Ill-looking;" "Insane, Mad;" "Lie, Untruth;" "Reliable, Trustworthy;" +"Air, Atmosphere;" "Resident, Dweller," etc. + + =Rare.= } Ex. + =Well done.= } + +This pair requires careful notice. "Rare" with reference to "Uncommon" +means _unusual_, _seldom met_, or _unfrequent_; but considered in +reference to "well done," it means _partially cooked_ or _underdone_. +This, then, is a clear case of Exclusion. Other examples: "Men whose +heads do grow beneath their shoulders, and men whose shoulders do grow +beneath their heads;" "Cushion, Mule's Hoof;" "Ungoverned, Henpecked;" +"Bed of Ease, Hornet's Nest;" "Waltz, Breakdown." + + =Well done.= } Ex. + =Badly done.= } + +A clear case of Exclusion. They are both "done," but one is done "well," +and the other "badly done," or the opposite of well. + + =Badly done.= } Ex. + =Good.= } + +A relation is sometimes found between one word and a part of another +word or phrase. Here "Bad" is the opposite of "Good." + + =Good.= } In. by G. & S. + =Good Princess.= } + +"Good" covers all cases, whatsoever, of its kind, but "Good Princess" is +a particular kind of species of good things or persons. Examples: +"Snake, Copperhead;" "Spider, Tarantula;" "Horse, Dray horse," etc. + +Now carefully read over the eleven words, and _recall_ or ascertain the +relations between them: + + Fieldhand. + Millionnaire. + Pauper. + Wealth. + Commonwealth. + Uncommon. + Rare. + Well done. + Badly done. + Good. + Good Princess. + +When you have _carefully realised the relations_ between these words, +lay aside the lesson and recall the entire series from memory, +proceeding from Fieldhand to Good Princess, and back from Good Princess +to Fieldhand. Do this five times--_each time from memory and more +rapidly than before_. + +Again, repeat from memory, at least five times, the series from Building +to Good Princess, and back from Good Princess to Building, reciting as +fast as possible each time. + + +THIRD AND LAST LAW OF MEMORY. + + =Good Princess.= } In. & Con. + =Pocahontas.= } + +A proper name as such has little meaning. It is usually a mere _sound_ +to which the person that bears it answers as the dog responds to the +name "Carlo." It is a sound which we call a name, and which we apply to +one person to distinguish that person from all others, as in this case +Pocahontas is used to distinguish the daughter of Powhattan from all +other Indian women. She knew who was meant when that name was applied to +her. But the name Pocahontas does not indicate that she was wise or +unwise, learned or unlearned, tall or short, old or young. In saving the +life of Capt. John Smith she became entitled to be called a "_Good_ +Princess." In this case it would be In. by G. & S. We have heard of all +this, and now when we think of Pocahontas, we are apt to remember that +she was a good Princess for saving Smith's life. The connection between +these words I call Concurrence. We have thought of these words together, +and the mind by its own operation has cemented them together, so that +when we think of one it is apt to make us remember the other. +_Concurrence means that which has been accidentally, or as cause and +effect, conjoined in our experience._ Between the words or ideas thus +conjoined, there is, strictly speaking, neither Inclusion or Exclusion. +Whenever there are unrelated things which the mind holds together simply +because it has occupied itself with them, then we have a case of +concurrence to be represented by Con. Other examples: "Harrison, +Tippecanoe;" "Columbus, America;" "Washington, Cherry Tree;" "Andrew +Jackson, To the Victors belong the Spoils;" "Newton, Gravitation;" +"Garfield, Guiteau;" "Gladstone, Home Rule," &c. + + =Pocahontas.= } Con. + =Capt. John Smith.= } + +We have read the story of the rescue of Smith by Pocahontas. We have +_thought of these names together_ and they have united in our memories +by the Law of Concurrence. When we recall the name of Pocahontas, we are +apt to revive also the name of Capt. John Smith and _vice versa_. +Another case:--A gentleman was present at Ford's Theatre in Washington +when John Wilkes Booth shot Abraham Lincoln. Just a moment before, he +recognised the odour of a hyacinth held by a lady in front of him. The +next moment he heard the fatal shot, and turning whence the report came, +he saw the murderous result. After the lapse of a quarter of a century, +he could not smell, see, or think of hyacinth without at once thinking +of that scene, nor could Lincoln's assassination be mentioned in his +presence without his instantly thinking of hyacinth. Nothing could have +been more purely _accidental_ than the quick succession of the sensation +of the odour and the murder of the President. But they were _experienced +together_ or nearly together. They became cemented together, so that the +revival of one is apt to call up the other, and this is concurrence. + + =Capt. John Smith.= } Con. + =Anvil.= } + +A proper name may be also used in other relations. The word, sound, or +name Smith may also be a general term applicable to many classes of +persons, as _coppersmith_, _goldsmith_, _silversmith_, &c. When we think +of _Capt. John_ Smith we use the word as a proper name. But when we +think of Smith and Anvil we use the word Smith in its general sense. In +either case it is an act of Concurrence. Smiths use anvils. We have +thought of these words together, and that mental act has had a tendency +to unite them together. + + =Anvil.= } In. by A. & C. + =Heavy.= } + +Anvil is a _concrete thing_ that possesses the attribute heaviness; and +heavy is an abstract term that applies to heavy things, but does not +state what they are. The idea or thought of heaviness is _common_ to +both words, and therefore it is a case of In., and as one term is +concrete and the other abstract, it is a case of In. by A. & C. + + =Heavy.= } Con. + =Gravitation.= } + +Things are heavy that press toward the earth, in consequence of the +action of gravity in their case. Gravitation, whatever that is, is what +makes them tend toward the earth. We may say it is a Cause, and as we +think of Cause producing Effect, and Effect as produced by Cause, such +cases are _thought of together_, or almost simultaneously, and hence we +have a case of Concurrence. + + =Gravitation.= } Con. + =Sir Isaac Newton.= } + +There is no In. or Ex. here, but Con. We have read or heard that Newton +discovered the Law of Gravitation. We have exercised our minds in regard +to these two words, in thinking of them together, and that is +concurrence. + + =Sir Isaac Newton.= } Con. + ="Diamond."= } + +Newton went out of his library on one occasion, leaving his pet dog +"Diamond" in the room. The dog jumped up on to the table, overturned the +light, which set fire to most valuable manuscripts. They burned up. When +Newton returned and discovered what his pet had done, he exclaimed, "O! +Diamond, Diamond, thou little knowest what thou hast done." The name +Diamond becomes thus vividly associated in our minds with the +forbearance of the great Newton. We cannot forget it. We hold them +together hereafter by Con. + + =Diamond.= } In. by s. + =Dying.= } + +A plain case of Inclusion by sound. + + =Dying.= } Con. + =Cholera.= } + +We know that cholera _causes_ numerous deaths; that people die in great +numbers wherever it prevails. + + =Cholera.= } Con. + =Terror.= } + +Concurrence includes all cases of Cause and Effect, Instrument or Means +to End, Person by whom or Thing by which, &c. Cholera causes terror. +Terror is the _effect_ of the existence of the cholera. Now carefully +read over the eleven words just considered, and think out the relations +between them. + + Good Princess. + Pocahontas. + Capt. John Smith. + Anvil. + Heavy. + Gravitation. + Sir Isaac Newton. + "Diamond." + Dying. + Cholera. + Terror. + +Now recite them from memory at least five times forward and backward, +and then recite the entire thirty words from Building to Terror, and +from Terror to Building, the same number of times. + +For further training, let each pupil recite the foregoing series of +thirty words forward and backward two or three times per day for an +entire month. He need not stop further study, but whatever else he +learns let him at least practise this daily recital for one month. + + +REMARKS ON THE THREE LAWS. + +1. Since words have different meanings, we may sometimes find that a +pair of words exemplify all three Laws, as plough and sword. The +relation between them may be In., since both of them are _cutting_ +instruments; one cuts and hacks human beings and the other cuts and +turns over the soil. It may be Ex., in a metaphorical sense, as one is +the emblem of peace and the other of war, and it may be Con., as we have +_often thought of them together_ as we read in the Bible of beating +swords into ploughshares. + +2. Learning a series of words by heart by thinking of the _Relations_ +between them is wholly unlike learning it by _rote_. In the latter case, +three or five words at a time or all ten words are read over from 10 to +20 times. This reading secures scarcely anything more than a _succession +of sights to the eye_ or _sounds to the ear_. No _study_ of the words is +required. The _action_ of the _intellect_ is not invoked. It is the +_mere sensuous_ impression of Eye or Ear or both together that holds the +words together, and thus _many or endless_ repetitions are required to +memorise a series which a _conscious thoughtful use of those Laws_ +enables us to learn by _one painstaking_ perusal. + +Another way of learning such a series by _rote_, is to limit the +_extent_ of the repetitions. Instead of reading over the entire series +or a large part of it many times, the series is slowly read over once or +several times _by pairs_, only two words at a time, but the method of +_acquirement_ is precisely the same as in the former rote process. Let +us look at this last proceeding in detail. (1) It is usually applied +only where there is a _natural suggestiveness_ between each pair of +words. (2) But no previous study is prescribed in regard to what +_constitutes_ this suggestiveness, nor are the _varieties_ of it set +forth and required to be mastered. (3) But above all, no _study_ of the +_pairs of words themselves_ is insisted upon. On the contrary, all such +study is emphatically deprecated. The mind is not allowed to be +_directed_ to anything in _particular_ in reading over the pairs. It +must be _left_ without a _rudder_ or guide to float wherever it listeth. +It is not to be "interfered with" by our will. What is this but +intellectual dawdling? A method of Vacuity pure and simple--the exact +opposite of Mental Assimilation. (4) If in reading over many times an +entire series, only the ear and eye are mainly affected and the +_intellect is left to wander_, much more must it wander here. In running +over many words, the intellect might be arrested by chance. But here +the series consisting of two words only and all attempt to occupy or +engage the intellect being purposely avoided, and nothing being done to +enchain the attention to the consideration of the meaning or sounds of +the two words, or the _relation_ between them, the intellect wanders +away from want of occupation. If when we wish to retain in our memories +a paragraph of fine sentiment or lucid reasoning, we find our attention +wanders, so it must wander here where only a pair of words is before it, +and we are not only not furnished with any tests or guides or stimulus +or motive for examining the words or for _finding the relation_ between +them, but on the contrary we are forbidden to interfere with the +spontaneous action of the mind. The _intellect might be abolished_ so +far as its _participation_ in such an operation is concerned. What is +absorbed in such a case is absorbed intuitively and blindly. Hence we +see that what is accomplished by these two processes of _rote_ learning +is weak impressions upon the memory and a distinct cultivation of mind +wandering. + +This method of _rote_ learning by pairs was invented and first taught by +Thomas Hallworth in New York in 1822. His method was adopted without +acknowledgment by Carl Otto in Germany and Austria, and his followers in +England and America.[A] + +[A] These followers make a great boast of learning a series of +suggestive words in pairs and without interfering with the mind's action +in doing so, when they are clearly indebted to Thomas Hallworth for this +inadequate method, yet they never have the grace to acknowledge their +indebtedness. + +3. The opposite of these two methods of _rote_ learning is my method, +which injects an _active process_ between each pair of words. Each pair +of words is appraised and dovetailed by the Laws of Memory. And hence +the reader can notice the _fundamental difference_ between all other +methods and mine. My method is to keep the mind in an _assimilating, +absorbing condition when trying to learn_ by making the Intellect stay +with the Senses. In the process of _endless repetition_ or learning by +_rote_ as evinced in the two methods above given, the mind is in a +_passive_ state. But when learning the above series by _my_ method, it +was kept in an _active_ state. The _intellect_ was directed by the will +into certain channels and kept there. It was _searching_ for what was +_in common_ or _different_ between the pairs of words. It was _noting_ +points of likeness and classifying them. _This is thinking._ And the +most vivid _First Impressions_ always result from the action of the +_intellect_ upon the sensuous _stimuli_ from ear and eye. _Intellectual +Assimilation_ is a proper name for my methods. + +4. The Three Laws are Forms or Modes of Mental Assimilation. But when +used _consciously_ for any length of time, they operate much more +efficaciously than formerly--and they greatly increase the +Impressionability and Revivability--as any student can affirm who +faithfully carries out my instructions, and then his General Memory +becomes largely improved without a conscious use of my method. + + +A TRAINING EXERCISE IN ATTENTION. + +Whoever wishes to increase his permanent Memory power and his power of +Attention must not omit to learn and practise the following exercise +_precisely as I prescribe_. He will experience great satisfaction in +carrying out my directions to the letter, because his conformity in this +and in other respects will bring the reward of a NEW MEMORY power almost +immediately. And if he were to disregard my directions, he will have no +one to blame but himself. + +He must write down the first two words, "Ice" and "Slippery," the latter +word under the former. Let him ascertain the exact relation between +these words. He will find that "Ice" is a concrete word, and "Slippery" +indicates a quality of "Ice" and of other things. He places opposite the +abbreviation In., by A. and C. In a similar way he proceeds to write +down one word at a time, and at once ascertaining its relation to the +previous word, and indicating that relation by the appropriate +abbreviation. When he has analysed ten words in this painstaking manner +he must recall them backward and forward from memory at least five +times, and each time faster than the other. + +Let him deal with the next ten in a similar manner in all respects, and +then let him repeat the twenty words both ways at least five times, and +so on till he has analysed, learned and recited the entire one hundred +words; and, finally, let him recite the one hundred words both ways at +least once a day for thirty days, in connection with the Building Series +and the Presidential Series and Series of English Sovereigns hereafter +given. + +As the result of this Analysis and recitals, the pupil will make these +Laws of In., Ex., and Con. _operate hereafter in an unconscious manner_, +with a power a hundred-fold greater than before practising this method. + + Ice. Hounds. Hose. Chicken. + Slippery. Bark. Rose. Feathers. + Smooth. Tree. Bush. Down. + Rough. Woods. Guerilla. Up. + Ruffian. Prairie. Rill. Upstart. + Prison. Air. Water-power. Begin. + Crime. Wind. Manufacture. Bee. + Crimea. Hurricane. Man. Honey. + War. Reign. Manager. Hives. + Army. Governor. Conductor. Wives. + Navy. Steam-engine. Cars. Mormon. + Ship. Newspaper. Track. Brigham Young. + Sail. Ream. Trotting. Old. + Auction. Quire. Fair. Cold. + Bid. Inquire. Foul. Winter. + Competition. Inquest. Chanticleer. Summer. + Petition. Jury. Chandelier. Ft. Sumter. + Signatures. Decide. Gas. Stone. + Cygnet. Cider. Coal. Mason. + Net. Apple. Mine. Maize. + Ensnare. Orchard. Shaft. Fodder. + Capture. Charred. Arrow. Cattle. + Cap. Burned. Quiver. Catalogue. + Gun. Stove. Indian. Log. + Hunter. Fire. Black-Hawk. Saw-mill. + +I occasionally find that a bright, highly-gifted person makes a poor +learner of my system, because he acts on hasty inferences of his own +instead of attending to my long-tried and never-failing methods. To +illustrate: Instead of _analysing the above series in pairs_, and +_discovering_ and _noting_ the _relation_ between each pair as I +require, _he reads over the entire series_. His previous study of the +Memory Laws has, however, so impressed his mind with their influence +that he is able to retain this series after only two or three perusals. +Or, instead of reading over the entire series, he may even _slowly read +the series in pairs, but without analysis, without trying to ascertain +and realise the exact relation between the words_. This is the method of +Vacuity or Dawdling formerly mentioned. But his study of the three Laws +in learning the Building Series has so sharpened and quickened his +appreciation of In., Ex., and Con., that he _learned the one hundred +words in this wrong_ way _very readily_. + +_But why should he not follow my directions?_ Why not pursue my plan and +thereby acquire the _full power_ of my system instead of the small +portion of that power gained by disregarding my direction? On the other +hand, pupils of only average natural ability are very apt to follow my +directions to the letter and thereby acquire an amount of Memory +Improvement which the above gifted, but non-complying pupil, seems +unable to understand. + +If a person is afflicted with a _very_ bad memory in any or all +respects, and particularly if this memory weakness is traceable to +_mind-wandering_, or if it co-exist with the latter infirmity, such a +person may find it best to make a series of from _one hundred to five +hundred words_ on the model of the foregoing series, and learn the same +and _recite it daily both ways_ for a month or more in addition to the +prescribed exercises, and if any trace of mind-wandering remain after +that, let him make and memorise another series of the same extent and +practise it for the same period. The _worst cases of mind-wandering_ and +_of weak memories_ always yield to this training treatment. + +In like manner, but in much inferior degree, _the recital of what has +just been heard_, such as anecdotes, narratives, contents of plays, +lectures, &c., not only tends to fix the recited matter in the memory, +but also to strengthen the memory generally, _provided the recital takes +place_ shortly after the listening, as that is like a continuation of +the original experience. + + +TRAINING THE INTELLECT TO STAY WITH THE SENSES. + +_Attention is the Will directing the Intellect into some particular +channel and keeping it there._ There are virtually two processes +involved in Attention. The Intellect is directed into a particular +channel, but to keep it there, all intruders must be excluded. To +illustrate. A student attempts to learn a proposition in Geometry. To do +this he must keep his mind on the printed explanations, and if his +thoughts attempt to fly away, he must repress that attempt. To guide his +mind into the channel of the printed exposition, he calls into play the +Directory power of the attention. To prevent intruders or extruders from +withdrawing his mind from the text, he exercises the Inhibitory function +of the Attention. + +To fully understand what takes place when trying to study, let the pupil +recall that there are three sources of knowledge. + +First: The Senses carry into his mind reports from the outside +world--Sensation--sight of the letters, words and sentences, &c. Second: +The Intellect operates on these undigested elementary Sense-reports, or +Sensations, and find _relations_ among them. This is Perception, or +relations among Sensations. Third: The mind acts on the _perceived +relations_ and finds relations among them. This is Reason or relations +among relations. + +Now the geometrical student in reading the printed instructions to +himself or in reading them aloud, might simply occupy his _eye_, or _eye +and ear_ with them and his Reason might soar away to other subjects, +climes or ages. + +Remember that the Intellect is always active and busy, and the question +for us to answer in our own case is--shall it co-operate with the senses +or the matter before us, or shall it wander away? + +What the geometrical student requires and what we all require in such +cases is to _compel the Intellect to stay with the Senses, and follow +the printed train of thought_. + +Interest in the subject helps to secure this co-operation. And the +_Process or Method of study_, if it be an Assimilating one, also compels +this co-operation. And one of the processes which is most of all +effective in TRAINING the Intellect to obey the Will and thereby to stay +with the Senses (where it is not a case of pure reflection), and thereby +to institute and develop the Habit of the activity of the Intellect +co-operating with the action of the mere senses, is practice in the use +of the Laws of In., Ex., and Con. To illustrate: In reciting the last +training example of one hundred words, the Directory power is exercised +and then the Inhibitory power is brought into play, and so on +_alternately_. Suppose the reciter has got to "Signatures." If he does +not inhibit or exclude from his mind the word "Petition" he can make no +advance. If he dwells upon "Petition" he will never reach "Cygnet." But +if he inhibits "Petition" his Directory power sends him on to "Cygnet," +and then inhibiting "Signatures" he proceeds from "Cygnet" to "Net," +&c., &c. In this most simple, elementary way he exercises and trains the +Directory and Inhibitory functions to co-operate in recalling the entire +Series, and notice how many distinct and separate times he has exerted +the Directory function and how many times the Inhibitory function in +reciting a short series. And if _he has learned_ this and other Series +_as I direct_ and then _recites them forward and backward as long as I +require_, he is sure to greatly strengthen his Attention and thereby +habituate the intellect to stay with the senses and thereby help to +banish mind-wandering. And when the Intellect is thus trained into the +Habit of staying with the sense of sight or hearing in reading or +listening, the geometrical or other student can keep his mind on the +subject before him until it is mastered. + + +IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF ANALYSIS. + +It sometimes happens that we wish to quickly learn five or twenty Proper +Names, the whole or part of which are _entirely new_ to us, as a list of +members of a committee, a series of facts in science, &c. We can usually +do this by Analysis. + +Recollective Analysis, or Analysis for the purpose of helping to learn +by heart, is not an originating or _manufacturing_ process. It simply +_finds_ relation _already existing_ between the words or the ideas which +the words suggest or evoke. But where there is _no existing relation_ +between the words or ideas, it is a case for Synthesis, to be taught +hereafter. + +The highest Analysis relates to _objects_, or rather to the _ideas_ we +have of them, and the lowest to _mere words_, to mere articulated +sounds, or their written or printed representatives. The great body of +examples and illustrations in my lessons pertain to ideas; but in the +list of twenty-four Presidents I deal with the proper Names as words +only, as words or articulated sounds--words which are nearly devoid of +meaning except as marks or sounds for naming persons, or as words +containing syllables which may have a general meaning in other +applications. I need scarcely add that the Laws of In., Ex., and Con. +apply to words merely as well as to the ideas which are, of course, +suggested by the words. Let me illustrate: Ulysses S. Grant was +succeeded by Rutherford B. Hayes. The initial syllables of Ulysses and +of Rutherford make an inclusion by sound. The "U" of Ulysses is +pronounced as if spelled "You." We then have in effect "You" and "Ru," +or "You" and "Ruth"--when we are supposed to pronounce the "u" in Ruth +as a long "u;" but if it be considered to be a short sound of "u," it is +only a weak case of In. by s. But if the pupil shuts his eyes, such +inclusions will not be observed. It is true that such application is not +so high or grand as when they govern ideas, but it is equally _genuine_. +It is only a lower stratum, but still it is a part of _terra firma_, and +on no account is it to be ignored. + +_Ideas are never words_ nor are _words ever ideas_, but words become so +_associated_ with ideas by habit, or by the Law of Concurrence, that +they _arouse certain ideas_ whenever they are used. They are used as +_signs_ of ideas--as the means of communicating them. There is rarely, +if ever, any _necessary_ connection that we can discover between a +particular idea and the word used to stand for it. Not only do different +nations use different _words_ or _sounds_ to arouse the _same_ thought, +but different words in the same language are sometimes used to portray +practically _the same idea_, as in the case of Mariner, Sailor, Seaman, +Jack Tar, Navigator, Skipper, &c., &c. Nor is this all--the _same sound_ +may awaken different ideas, as "I" and "Eye." In the first case "I" +stands for the person using it, and in the last case it means the organ +of sight. To the eyesight they are obviously unlike. It may be well to +remark that in imposing a name in the first place, _a reason_ may exist +why that name is given, as Albus (white) was given to the mountains, +now more euphoniously called Alps, because they were white or +snow-crowned; but Alps does not _mean_ white to the moderns. The word +now merely indicates or points out the mountains so called. A word may +survive and take a new meaning after its original meaning is no longer +ascertainable. + +The _context_ helps us to know which meaning of the word was intended +when the word is spoken, and the context and spelling tell the same +thing when writing or print is used. Take the words "Hounds, Bark." Here +Bark means the cry or yelp of the dogs. But in "Tree, Bark," the Bark of +the tree is suggested. Yet the word Bark is spelled precisely the same +in both cases. The word spelled "Bark" is really used to express two +different things and the context generally tells which is meant in any +particular case. + +Individual _letters_ become so strongly associated with a particular +meaning that although the vocal value is exactly the same, yet the one +spelling goes to one man and the other to a different man. "Spenser" +would never suggest to a learned man the author of the "Philosophy of +Evolution," nor would "Spencer" ever suggest the author of the "Fairie +Queen." "Mr. Mil" would never mean "John Stuart Mill," although the +words "Mil" and "Mill" are pronounced exactly alike. We sometimes cannot +recall a Proper Name, yet we feel sure that it begins or ends with S or +K or L, or that a certain other letter is in the middle of the word. We +usually find that we were right. In these cases _our clue to the entire +word was found in only one letter of it_. + +Noticing that the _same letter is in common to two words_, although _all +the other letters may be different_, is one case of Inclusion by +spelling. Take an example: President John Tyler was followed by +President James K. Polk. Analyse the two names--Tyler and Polk. The +letter "l" alone is common to the two names. Here is one _letter_ found +in totally unlike contexts. If this fact is _noticed_, it cannot but +help hold those two names together. The exercise of learning the names +of the twenty-four Presidents is a good one for this purpose. It has a +_training_ value entirely apart from its practical value in that case. +And I give it for its _training_ value alone. + +It is infinitely better for him to learn by analysis the _order_ of the +Presidents than to learn that order by the only other method the pupil +has heretofore known, viz., _endless repetition_. When the pupil thinks +a relation may be weak, let him consider that a weak relation _thought +about_ is a hundred-fold stronger than _mere_ repetition _without any +thinking at all_. It is either _thoughtless_ repetition, or _thoughtful +Analysis_ that he must use. + + + + +HOW TO LEARN PROPER NAMES IN A CERTAIN ORDER OF SUCCESSION. + + +The true way to learn such lists as those of the Popes of Rome, the +Kings of England and of the American Presidents is to learn them in +their places in History, as parts of the Historical order of events to +which they belong, as facts in the chain of causes and effects. + +Their Terms, Administrations, or Reigns are, however, used by historians +as landmarks, and to follow the historians to the best advantage, it may +be desirable to know the series as such, as a useful preparation for the +study of the Times and age. But whatever the advantages of knowing the +order of the American Presidents, I deal with it here _solely_ for the +_training_ effect in Analysis and as an example of a method of dealing +with any list of _mere_ names. + +The mode of dealing with this Presidential series will show how all +similar Series may be handled during the period of the pupil's training. +I divide the series or list of the twenty-four American Presidents into +three Groups: the first Group containing _seven_ names, the second +having _eight_ names, and the third having _nine_ names. The number of +names in each Group is easily remembered: 7, 8 and 9. + +The first Group contains the names of + + GEORGE WASHINGTON, + JOHN ADAMS, + THOMAS JEFFERSON, + JAMES MADISON, + JAMES MONROE, + JOHN Q. ADAMS, + ANDREW JACKSON. + +If the student has mastered the previous exercises, he ought to be able +to analyse this Group of names with the greatest ease. Let him try, and +if he fail, then let him study my Analysis as given below. Points of +Analysis that appear weak to me may be strong for him, or _vice versa_. +At all events, let him if possible learn each of the three Groups by his +own Analysis, looking at my work afterwards. + + +FIRST GROUP. + +_Period of Organisation and Consolidation._ + + =George WashingTON.= } In. + =JOHN Adams.= } + +"Ton" and "John" make a fairly good In. by sound. + + =JOHN Adams.= } In. + =THOMas Jefferson.= } + +"John" and "Thom" (the "h" is silent in both names) make an In. by +sound, imperfect but adequate if _noticed_. + + =Thomas JefferSON.= } In. + =James MadiSON.= } + +Both names terminating with the same syllable, "son", makes a clear case +of In. by sound and spelling. + + =JAMES Madison.= } In. + =JAMES Monroe.= } + +This pair of names furnishes an example of perfect In. by sound and +spelling in the Christian names. + + =James MONroe.= } In. + =JOHN Q. Adams.= } + +"Mon" and "John" give us a good In. by sound. + + =JOHN Q. Adams.= } In. + =Andrew JACKson.= } + +"Jack" is a nickname for John--a case of Synonymous In. + +Now let the pupil repeat from memory the series from George Washington +to Andrew Jackson at least five times, each time recalling and realizing +how each pair of names was linked together. After this let the list be +recalled several times forward and backward, and more rapidly each +time, without recalling the analysis. + + +REMARKS. + +1. This group may well be termed the "Long-Term Group," since all of the +seven Presidents except John Adams and his son, John Q. Adams, served +two terms. + +2. Three of the members of this group died after the close of their +terms of office, on the _natal day_ of the Republic, viz., John Adams +and Thomas Jefferson, on the _4th of July_, 1826, and James Monroe on +the _4th of July_, 1831. + +3. This group also might be called the "J" group, since the initial +letter of the Christian name or surname of every member of it begins +with "J" or its phonetic equivalent, soft G, as _G_eorge Washington, +_J_ohn Adams, Thomas _J_efferson, _J_ames Madison, _J_ames Monroe, +_J_ohn Q. Adams, and Andrew _J_ackson. + + +SECOND GROUP. + +_Period of Territorial Expansion and the Growth of Internal Dissension._ + + =ANDREW Jackson.= } In. + =Martin VAN BUren.= } + +Two examples of In.: "An" and "Van", and "rew" and "Bu." + + =Martin Van BuREN.= } In. + =William HENry Harrison.= } + +A good Inclusion occurs in the case of "ren" and "Hen." The name William +belonged to no other of the twenty-four Presidents. + + =William HenRY Harrison.= } In. + =John TYler.= } + +A fair example of In. by Sight ["y" occurs in both names] is furnished +by the syllables "ry" and "Ty." + + =John TyLer.= } In. & + =James K. PoLk.= } Con. + +The letter "l" belongs to both surnames but there is no other letter in +common. John and James is a case of Con., for both occur together many +times in the New Testament. + + =James K. Polk.= } In. + =Zachary TAYlor.= } + +"K" is pronounced as if spelled "Kay," a good In. with "Tay." + + =ZachARy Taylor.= } In. + =MillARd Fillmore.= } + +The letters "ar" occur in both the Christian names. + + =MillARd Fillmore.= } Con. + =FrANklin Pierce.= } + +The "ar" of Millard and the "an" of Franklin is a case of Con. reversed, +_i.e._, "an" and "ar" is Con. since "n" precedes "r" in the Alphabet. +Here the alphabetical order is reversed. + + =FrANklin Pierce.= } In. + =James BuchANAN.= } + +The "an" in Franklin is identical in spelling and in sound with the two +"ans" in Buchanan. + +Let the student recall the series of names from Andrew Jackson to James +Buchanan several times, and at each recall let him also recall the +_relation_ which bound the pairs together, and then let him recall the +series from Washington to Buchanan, both forward and backward, without +consciously reviving the relations. + + +REMARKS. + +1. This may be called the "Single Term Group," since none of the group +served more than one term. + +2. The group is notable for the fact that it is the only one in which +two Presidents (William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor) died +_natural_ deaths while in office. + + +THIRD GROUP. + +_Period of Civil War and Reconstruction._ + + =JAMes Buchanan.= } In. + =AbrahAM Lincoln.= } + +This pair of names furnishes an In. by _spelling_, not sound, "am" in +both, but not pronounced alike. This must be _noticed_, as it is a weak +In. + + =Abraham LinCOLN.= } In. + =Andrew JOHNson.= } + +The "l" in "coln," and the "h" in "John" are silent. It is a case of In. +by sound. To the ear the sound of "Con." is like that of "Jon." + + =ANdrew Johnson.= } In. + =Ulysses S. GrANt.= } + +"An" in Andrew and in Grant has the same sound. + + =UlyssES S. Grant.= } In. + =Rutherford B. HayES.= } + +"Es" in Ulyss_es_ and in Hay_es_ is the same in _spelling_--but not in +sound. It must be _noticed_, as it is the weakest of all. A stronger tie +has heretofore been given. + + =Rutherford B. HAYes.= } Con. + =James A. GarFIELD.= } + +There is a strong association between Hay of _Hay_es and and the field +of Gar_field_, as in the familiar word "Hayfield." + + =James A. GARfield.= } In. + =Chester A. ARthur.= } + +In "Gar" and "Ar" there is a strong In. by sound. + + =Chester A. ArTHUR.= } In. + =GroVER Cleveland.= } + +Between "thur" and "ver" there is a clear In. by sound. + + =Grover ClevelANd.= } Con. + =BenjAMin Harrison.= } + +There is a fair In. by sound between "an" and "am;" but as they are +alphabetically reversed, it makes a case of Con. reversed. + + =BenjAMin Harrison.= } In. & + =Grover ClevelANd.= } Ex. + +Here "am" and "an" occur in alphabetical order, and is a case of In., +and "jam," meaning pressing together, and "cle(a)ve" meaning to +separate, are opposites, hence it is also an example of Exclusion. + +Let the student, as in the case of the other groups, recall this list +several times, and each time revive the relation by which each pair of +names was cemented together, and after this let him recall this list +several times both ways without reviving the cementing relations, and +finally let him recall several times, both ways, the entire series of +Presidents from Washington to Cleveland, and from Cleveland to +Washington. + + +REMARKS. + +1. This group furnishes the notable fact that two Presidents (Lincoln +and Garfield) were assassinated while in office. + +2. Another peculiarity of this group is that, for the first time since +the days of Washington, there was a widespread discussion and effort +made to push the claims of a President (Grant) for a third term. + +3. This group contains the name of the grandson (Benjamin Harrison) of +William Henry Harrison, of the second group. The only other instance of +relationship between the Presidents was in the case of John Adams and +his son, John Quincy Adams of the first group. + +4. This group contains the name of the only President (Andrew Johnson) +who was ever sought to be impeached. The prosecution failed to convict, +having lacked one vote of the number necessary for a conviction. + +5. Grover Cleveland affords the first instance where the two terms of a +President are separated by the full term of another President (Benjamin +Harrison). + + + + +ENGLISH SOVEREIGNS. + +A UNIQUE EXERCISE. + + +The method here used of memorising the order of the English sovereigns +from William I., the Conqueror, to Victoria possesses the following +novelties:-- + +(1) We learn the order of the entire series of thirty-seven sovereigns +by means of the relations, direct and indirect, which we establish with +the reigning sovereign, Victoria. + +(2) The precise credit is claimed for this method which it is entitled +to receive. In a list of proper names we sometimes have several surnames +alike, with usually a difference of Christian names, as in the +presidential series we have--_William Henry_ Harrison and _Benjamin_ +Harrison, and _John_ Adams and _John Quincy_ Adams, and we also +sometimes have the same Christian names prefixed to different surnames, +as James _Madison_ and James _Monroe_. But in the Sovereigns of England, +from William I. to Victoria, we have many Christian names alike, and the +differences indicated by _ordinal_ numbers, as George I., George II., +George III., George IV. This order of the English Kings is most +extraordinary, neither the Popes of Rome, nor the French, nor any other +list of kings, furnishing any parallel in more than a few incidents. It +is these unique coincidences and recurrences that make it so easy to +find relations between these sovereigns. This method is not applicable +to the American Presidents, Prime Ministers of England, or hardly any +other series. + +(3) No accidental relations of parts of names is resorted to, as was +done in the case of the American Presidents. + +(4) The series is so taught that it can be recited forwards and +backwards--the only true test of learning any series. + +(5) The series is completely worked out and nothing is left to chance or +possible mistakes so liable to be committed by novices in dealing for +the first time with a new process that has to be applied to many +details. + +(6) When the series is carefully studied and the relations painstakingly +_characterised_, it is quickly learned and it is hard to forget. + +(7) When the series is learned by this method and the relations are +occasionally reviewed and _identified_, its recital both ways once or +twice a day for a month helps to develop the Attention as well as the +Assimilative powers. + +(8) The _exact name_ of each Sovereign is learned. The student relies on +real relations and names, and not on unidentified jingles of threes and +threes and twos and twos, like three Edwards and three Henrys and two +Edwards and two Henrys, with the inevitable necessity of having +afterwards to learn _which_ Edward and _which_ Henry was meant, &c. But +summations can follow specifications. + +(9) Pestalozzi [1745-1827] taught that we must proceed from the "known" +to the "unknown;" but this principle mainly applies to learning the +words of a foreign language. When we begin to learn such words they are +wholly unknown to us. But in learning ordinary series of names or prose +or poetry by heart, all the names and words used may be equally well +known by us; but it is mainly the _order_ in which these occur that we +wish to memorise, and we begin at the beginning and proceed as we learn +on from the Better Known or Best Known. In the list of American +Presidents the series extends back to a little more than a century; but +in the case of the English Sovereigns, when we begin with the Conqueror, +the series extends back to 1066--upwards of 800 years--and, although in +such a series the names of all the Sovereigns may be known, yet the +latest is vastly better known to us than the earliest. In such a case it +may be most useful to begin with the Best Known. + +(10) Fortunately in this case the Best Known Sovereign is a PIVOT around +which all the other Sovereigns are directly or indirectly related. +_How_, we will proceed to show. Something of the method will be +intimated by the difference of type and spaces between the names:-- + + William I. Henry VII. + William II. Henry VIII. + Henry I. Edward VI. + Stephen. _Mary._ + Henry II. _Elizabeth._ + James I. + Richard I. Charles I. + + John. Council of State and Parliament. + Henry III. Oliver Cromwell. + Edward I. Richard Cromwell. + Edward II. Council of State and Parliament. + Edward III. Charles II. + James II. + Richard II. William III. and Mary. + _Anne._ + Henry IV. Henry IV. + Henry V. George I. + Henry VI. George II. + Edward IV. George III. + Edward V. George IV. + William IV. + Richard III. VICTORIA. + +We begin with the Best Known, or Victoria, and we take note that she is +an independent Queen, since she has never shared sovereignty with +anyone; but Mary, of "William III. and Mary," was not an independent +Queen, because she did share the Sovereign Power with her husband. +Hereafter, when I use the word Queen I mean an independent Queen, except +when Mary, of "William III. and Mary," is mentioned, and her name will +be used only in Connection with William III. England has had only four +independent Queens, namely, Mary [Tudor], Elizabeth, Anne, and Victoria. + +(I.) Victoria is the _last_ queen and Mary was the _first_ queen +[Exclusion between _first_ and _last_, or Ex.], and Mary, _first_ queen, +was preceded by the _last_ Edward, or Edward VI. [Ex.] And Mary, the +_first_ queen, was followed by the the _first_ and only Elizabeth [In.] +And the _first_ and only Elizabeth was followed by James the _First_, or +I. [In.] Again, _Queen_ Elizabeth was followed by _King_ James, making a +clear case of Ex. Again, Anne, the _third_ queen, was preceded by Wm. +the _Third_, or III., and Mary [In.] And these _two_ co-equal +Sovereigns were preceded by James the _Second_, or II. [In., between +cardinal number _two_ and the ordinal number _Second_]. This series of +Queens concludes with Victoria the _fourth_ Queen, who was preceded by +William the _Fourth_, or IV. [In.], and William the _Fourth_, or IV., +was preceded by George the _Fourth_, or IV. [In.]; and George IV. by +George III., and he by George II., and he by George I.,--a concurrence +reversed, and William IV. was preceded, as we have seen, by William III. +and Mary--and William III. by William II., and William I. at the very +beginning of the series--Con. + +Now let us recall in the forward and reverse order what we have learned +so far. William I., William II., Edward VI., Mary, Elizabeth, James I., +James II., William III. and Mary, Anne, George I., George II., George +III., George IV., William IV., and Victoria, and the order reversed is +Victoria, William IV., George IV., George III., George II., George I., +Anne, William III. and Mary, James II., James I., Elizabeth, Mary, +Edward VI., William II., William I. + +(II.) Disregarding for the moment the four periods of what is usually +called the Commonwealth, we see that between Elizabeth and William III. +and Mary, are four monarchs, the two James and the two Charles. We +have already learned that Elizabeth was followed by James I. and that +William III. and Mary were preceded by James II. Hence we see that the +two Charles must come _between_ the two James, and, of course, that +Charles I. must precede Charles II., and that the order of these four +monarchs _must_ be James I., Charles I., Charles II., and James II.--a +plain case of Con. reversed. We saw that there were two of these four +monarchs before the Commonwealth; there must then be two after it, +making James I. and Charles I. before the Commonwealth and Charles II. +and James II. after it. + +On the day that Charles I. was executed (January 30, 1649), the +Parliament (the House of Commons) abolished the kingly office and House +of Lords, and appointed a Council of State of 41 members, which with the +House of Commons was to be the government. Intermediate then between +Charles I. and Charles II. there came-- + + Council of State and Parliament. + Oliver Cromwell. + Richard Cromwell. + Council of State and Parliament. + +Here we see there was a Council of State and Parliament at the beginning +and close of these intermediates, and between them came Oliver Cromwell +and his son, Richard Cromwell. Charles I., followed by Council of State +and Parliament, made a case of Exclusion and the Council of State and +Parliament, followed by the Protector Oliver Cromwell, gives another +example of Ex. and a case of In. between Oliver Cromwell and his son +Richard, who inherited the protectorate, but a case of Ex. again between +the powerful Oliver and his weak son Richard, and another example of Ex. +between the protectorate of Richard Cromwell and the Council of State +and Parliament, and another between the latter and the full-fledged +monarchy of Charles II. + +Now review what we have learned so far and we have William I., William +II., Edward VI., Mary, Elizabeth, James I., Charles I., Council of State +and Parliament, Oliver Cromwell, Richard Cromwell, Council of State and +Parliament, Charles II., James II., William III. and Mary, Anne, George +I., George II., George III., George IV., William IV., and Victoria. +Reverse the recital and we have Victoria, William IV., George IV., +George III., George II., George I., Anne, William III. and Mary, James +II., Charles II., Council of State and Parliament, Richard Cromwell, +Oliver Cromwell, Council of State and Parliament, Charles I., James I., +Elizabeth, Mary, Edward VI., William II., and William I. + +(III.) We now proceed to learn the eighteen kings intermediate between +William II. and Edward VI. We notice at once that the _first_ and _last_ +of these intermediates are the _first_ and _last_ Henrys [Ex.], viz., +Henry I. and Henry VIII. We see also that Henry the _First_, or I., is +followed by Henry the Second, or II. [Con.], with the _first_ and only +Stephen as the _first_ single intermediary [In.]. Returning to Edward +VI., we see that he, the _last_ Edward, is preceded by Henry VIII., or +the _last_ Henry [In.] We also notice that Edward VI. is preceded by +Henry VI., and Henry VI. by Henry III., or the half of six [In. by W. +and P.]. Finally we observe that between William II. and Mary, there are +three series of kings completed--eight Henrys, six Edwards, and three +Richards. Making the three Richards _reference_ points we can easily fix +the residue of the eighteen kings for we see that Richard I. or the +_First_, is preceded by Henry II. and followed by Henry III., with the +_first_ and only John as the _second_ single intermediary [In.] and that +Richard II. is preceded by Edward I., Edward II., and Edward III., or +three Edwards, and followed by Henry IV., Henry V., and Henry VI., or +three Henrys, and that Richard III. is preceded by Edward IV. and Edward +V., or two Edwards, and followed by Henry VII. and Henry VIII., or two +Henrys. + +Recalling the succession from William I. to Edward VI., we have William +I., William II., Henry I., Stephen, Henry II., Richard I., John, Henry +III., Edward I., Edward II., Edward III., Richard II., Henry IV., Henry +V., Henry VI., Edward IV., Edward V., Richard III., Henry VII., Henry +VIII., Edward VI. Reversing the order, we have Edward VI., Henry VIII., +Henry VII., Richard III., Edward V., Edward IV., Henry VI., Henry V., +Henry IV., Richard II., Edward III., Edward II., Edward I., Henry III., +John, Richard I., Henry II., Stephen, Henry I., William II., and William +I. + +We conclude with the recital both ways of the thirty-seven Sovereigns +from William I. to Victoria. + + William I. VICTORIA. + William II. William IV. + Henry I. George IV. + Stephen. George III. + Henry II. George II. + Richard I. George I. + John. ANNE. + Henry III. William III. and Mary, + Edward I. James II. + Edward II. Charles II. + Edward III. Council of State and Parliament. + Richard II. Richard Cromwell. + Henry IV. Oliver Cromwell. + Henry V. Council of State and Parliament. + Henry VI. Charles I. + Edward IV. James I. + Edward V. ELIZABETH. + Richard III. MARY. + Henry VII. Edward VI. + Henry VIII. Henry VIII. + Edward VI. Henry VII. + MARY. Richard III. + ELIZABETH. Edward V. + James I. Edward IV. + Charles I. Henry VI. + Council of State and Parliament. Henry V. + Oliver Cromwell. Henry IV. + Richard Cromwell. Richard II. + Council of State and Parliament. Edward III. + Charles II. Edward II. + James II. Edward I. + William III. and Mary. Henry III. + ANNE. John. + George I. Richard I. + George II. Henry II. + George III. Stephen. + George IV. Henry I. + William IV. William II. + VICTORIA. William I. + + + + +NUMERIC THINKING. + +HOW TO NEVER FORGET FIGURES AND DATES. + + +When my pupils have gained the quick perception and instantaneous +apprehension which always reward the studious use of In., Ex., and Con., +they can, amongst other new achievements, always remember and never +forget figures and dates. + +_Pike's Peak_, the most famous in the chain known as the Rocky Mountains +in America, is fourteen thousand one hundred and forty-seven feet high. +Instantly, one who is trained in the use of In., Ex., and Con., +perceives that there are two fourteens [Syn., In.] in these figures, and +that the last figure is half of fourteen, or 7 In. by W. and P., making +14,147. Of course, one who is not practised in analogies, in discovering +similarities and finding differences would not have noticed any +peculiarity in these figures which would enable him to remember them. +Few people ever notice any relations among numbers. But any possible +figures or dates always possess relations to the mind trained in In., +Ex., and Con. + +_Fujiyama_, the noted volcano of Japan, is twelve thousand three hundred +and sixty-five feet high. Does any pupil who has mastered the first +lesson and who is expert in the use of In., Ex., and Con., fail to +notice that here we have the disguised statement that the height of this +mountain is expressed in the number of months and days of the year, +12,365 feet high? These figures drop into that mould and henceforth are +remembered without difficulty. These are remarkable coincidences no +doubt, but are not all sets of figures similarly impressive coincidences +to the trained eye, and the _active_, _thinking_ and _assimilative_ +mind? + +No reader of English history has failed to notice the three sixes in the +date of the Great Fire in London, _viz._, 1666. The "three sixes" are +generally resorted to as a signal for fire companies to turn out in full +force; yet such a coincidence of figures in a distant date makes a +slight impression compared to the vividness of events that happened in +the year of our birth, the year of graduation from school, the year of +marriage, and the year of the death of relatives, &c., &c. Keep a small +blank book for such entries, not to help remember the dates or facts, +but to have them together so as to rapidly deal with them, to classify +them and otherwise study them under the eye. You will soon be astonished +at the accumulation. + +The population of New Zealand, exclusive of natives, is 672,265. +Bringing the first two figures into relation with the last two we have +67 and 65--a difference of 2 only. The two groups of 672 and 265 have +the figure 2 at the end of the first group, and another 2 at the +beginning of the second group. These two twos are in sequence (Con.), +and each of them expresses the difference between 67 and 65. _Thought_ +about in this way, or in any other, the series becomes fixed in mind, +and will be hard to forget. + +The population of Sydney is 386,400. Here are two groups of three +figures each. The first two figures of the first group are 38, and the +first two figures of the second group are 40--a difference of 2. Two +taken from 8 leaves 6, or the third figure of the first group, and 2 +added to the first figure of the second group makes 6. The 40 ends with +a cypher, and it is a case of Syn. In. that the last figure of the +second group or the third figure of it should likewise be a cypher. +Besides, those who know anything at all about the population of Sydney +must know that it is vastly more than 38,640, and hence that there must +be another cypher after 40, making the total of 386,400. + +The population of Melbourne is 490,912. Here we have 4 at the beginning +and half of 4 or 2 at the end of the six figures. The four interior +figures, viz., 9091 is a clear case of Con.--or 90 and 91. Then again 91 +ending with 1, the next figure is 2--a case of sequence or Con. But +490,912 is the population of the city of Melbourne with its suburbs. The +"city" itself contains only 73,361 inhabitants, 73 reversed becomes +37--or only 1 more than 36. This 1 placed at the end of or after 36 +makes the 361. Now 37 reversed is 73, and then follows 361, making the +total to be 73,361. + +Let the attentive pupil observe that this method does not give any set +of rules for thinking in the same manner in regard to different sets or +example of numbers. That would be impossible. Thinking or finding +relations amongst the objects of thought must be differently worked out +in each case, since the figures themselves are differently grouped. + +The foregoing cases in regard to population will suffice for those who +live in the Australian colonies, and to others they will teach the +method of handling such cases, and leave them the pleasure of working +out the process in regard to the population where they reside, or other +application of the method they may wish to make. + +Great encouragement is found in the circumstance that after considerable +practice in dealing with numerous figures through In., Ex., and Con., +new figures are self-remembered from the habit of assimilating numbers. +They henceforth make more vivid impressions than formerly. + +INCLUSION embraces cases where the same kind of facts or the principles +were involved, or the same figures occur in different dates with regard +to somewhat parallel facts--End of Augustus's empire [death] +14 A.D.--End of Charlemagne's [death] 814 A.D., and end of Napoleon's +[abdication] 1814 A.D. + +EXCLUSION implies facts from the opposite sides relating to the same +events, conspicuously opposite views held by the same man at different +periods, or by different men who were noticeably similar in some other +respects, or antithesis as to the character or difference in the +nationality [if the two nations are frequent foes] of different men in +whose careers, date of birth, or what not, there was something +distinctly parallel--Egbert, first King of England, died 837. William +IV., last King of England, died 1837. What a vivid exclusion here for +instance: Abraham died 1821 B.C., and Napoleon Bonaparte died 1821 A.D. + +CONCURRENCES are found in events that occur on the same date or nearly +so, or follow each other somewhat closely. + +Charles Darwin, who advocated evolution, now popular with scientists in +every quarter of the globe, and Sir H. Cole, who first advocated +International Exhibitions, now popular in every part of the world +[Inclusion] were born in the same year 1809 [Concurrence] and died in +the same year 1882 [Concurrence]. + +Garibaldi [the Italian] and Skobeleff [the Russian] [Exclusion, being of +different countries], both great and recklessly patriotic generals +[Inclusion] and both favourites in France [Inclusion], died in the same +year, 1882 [Concurrence]. Longfellow and Rossetti, both English-speaking +poets [Inclusion] who had closely studied Dante [Inclusion] died in the +same year, 1882 [Concurrence]. + +Haydn, the great composer, was born in 1732, and died in 1809; this date +corresponds to that of the birth [Exclusion and Concurrence] of another +famous composer [Inclusion], Mendelssohn, who himself died in 1847, the +same year as O'Connell. + +Lamarck [1744-1829], advocated a theory of development nearly +resembling the Darwinian Theory of the Origin of Species [In.]. This he +did in 1809, the year in which Charles Darwin was born [Con.]. Darwin's +writings have altered the opinions of many as to the Creation, and the +year of his birth was that of the death of Haydn, the composer of the +Oratorio "The Creation." [Con. and Ex.]. + +John Baptiste Robinet taught the gradual development of all forms of +existence from a single creative cause. He died in 1820, the year in +which Herbert Spencer, the English Apostle of Evolution, was born [In., +Ex., and Con.]. + +Galileo, founder of Modern Astronomy, born in 1564--Shakespeare's birth +year [Con.]--died in 1642, the very year in which Sir Isaac Newton was +born. Galileo's theory was not proved but merely made probable, until +the existence of the laws of gravitation was established, and it was +Newton who discovered gravitation. This is an instance of Inclusion as +to the men, of Exclusion and Concurrence as to date of birth and death. + +Two prominent _literati_ [Inclusion], one a Frenchman the other an +Englishman [Exclusion], well-known for the pomposity and sonority of +their style of writing [Inclusion], were born in the same year, 1709, +and died the same year 1784, a double Concurrence--Lefranc de +Pompignan--[pompous In. by S.], and Samuel Johnson. + +General Foy, an _orator_ and artillery officer, fond of literature, was +born the same year [Concurrence] 1775, as the _orator_ [Inclusion], +Daniel O'Connell. He died in 1825, the same year [Concurrence] as +Paul-Louis Courier, who was also an artillery officer [Inclusion], fond +of literature [Inclusion], and moreover, like O'Connell, a violent +pamphleteer [Inclusion]. + +Two illustrious, uncompromising characters [Inclusion], both brilliant +composers [Inclusion], the one musical, the other literary, the one a +representative of the music of the future, the other of the obsolete +polemic of the past [Exclusion], Richard Wagner and Louis Veuillot, were +born in the same year, 1813, and died in the same year, 1883. The last +point is a double Concurrence. + +Two foremost harbingers of modern thought [Inclusion], Voltaire and +J. J. Rousseau, died in 1778--[Concurrence]. Both gained for themselves +the reputation of having been the most reckless antagonists of +Christianity [Inclusion]. And still the one dedicated a church to the +service of God, whilst the other in his "Emile" wrote a vindication of +Christianity [Exclusion as to each of them, Inclusion as to both of +them]. + +A little practice makes the pupil prompt in dealing with any figures +whatever. Take the height of Mount Everest, which is 29,002 feet. We +have all heard that it is more than five miles high. Let us test this +statement. There are 5,280 feet in a mile, multiply 5,280 by 5, and we +have 26,400. Hence we see that Mount Everest being 29,002 feet high must +be more than five miles high. Half of a mile is 5,280 feet divided by 2, +or 2,640 feet. Add this to 26,400 and we have 29,040. Hence we see that +Mount Everest is 51/2 miles high lacking 38 feet, or that if we add +38 feet to its height of 29,002, it would then be exactly 51/2 miles high. +Can we then forget that it is exactly 29,002 feet high? + +Shakespeare was born in 1564 and died in 1616. The First Folio Edition +of his works was printed in 1623, the Second in 1632, the Third in 1664, +and the Fourth in 1685. Can we fix these events infallibly in our +memories? We can begin with whichever date we prefer. If we add +together the figures of the year of his birth, 1564, they make 16. All +the dates hereafter considered occurred in 1600, &c. We can thus +disregard the first 16 and consider only the last two figures which +constitute the fraction of a century. + +Let us begin with his death in 1616 in the _sixteens_. Is not this a +vivid collocation of figures? Can we forget it as applied to the great +dramatist? Now if we double the last 16, it gives us the date of the +second Folio in [16]32 and 32 reversed gives us the date of the first +Folio. Again, seven years after his death ["seven ages of man"] his +first Folio was published in 1623. The second Folio was published in +1632 or 23 reversed, and the third Folio in 1664, or 32 doubled, and +just 100 years after his birth in 1564. His birth might also be +remembered as occurring in the same year as that of the great astronomer +Galileo. The fourth Folio appeared in 1685 or 21 years after the third +Folio. This period measures the years that bring man's majority or full +age. + +Attention to the facts of reading will be secured by increased power of +Concentration, and a familiarity with In., Ex., and Con. will enable us +to assimilate all dates and figures by numeric thinking with the +greatest promptitude, especially the longer or larger series. + +Try the case of Noah's Flood, 2348 B.C. Here the figures pass by a unit +at a time from 2[3] to 4, and then by doubling the 4 we have the last +figure 8--making altogether 2348. Another method of dealing with this +date is very instructive. Read the account in Gen. ch. vii., vv. 9, 13, +and 15. Now we can proceed. + +They went into the Ark by _twos_. This gives the figure 2. Now let us +find the other figures. Noah's three sons and their wives make three +pairs of persons, or _three_ families. This gives the second figure 3. +Then counting Noah and his wife, and his three sons and their wives, +there were four pairs of human beings altogether. This gives the figure +4. Finally the total number of human beings who entered the ark were +4 pairs or _eight_ persons. This gives the figure 8. Thus we have the +entire set of figures, 2348 B.C. Take the date of the creation +according to the accepted biblical chronology as 4004 B.C. We could say +the date has _four_ figures, that the expression of it begins and ends +with the figure 4, and that the two intermediates are nought, or +cyphers; or that the figures are expressed by 40 and _forty reversed_ as +40-04--or 4004. + + +A SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT. + +Having met several persons who claimed that they always remembered +figures by reasoning about them [whatever that may have meant], and yet +all such persons having shown an inability to remember many dates or +numbers, I inferred that they were honestly mistaken in supposing that +they could remember numbers, or else that such a method was not adapted +to their idiosyncrasies. At that time, I did not suspect that their +failure may have arisen from lack of _training_ in In., Ex., and Con. +From the circumstance that I myself could use this method with +promptitude and certainty, I determined to test it in a strictly +scientific way. + +I made the experiment two years ago, and all my experience since has +corroborated the conclusion then arrived at. + +I experimented with the two groups of 20 pupils each. Neither knew any +method of dealing with dates and numbers. The first group had had no +training in In., Ex., and Con.; the second group had been well practised +in those laws. I then gave each member of each group several very +difficult cases of dates and numbers to be memorised--one example +containing 24 figures. To save time and space in exposition, I have +heretofore only mentioned 12 figures, or the half of the amount. All of +the first group failed except one. He, however, could not memorise the +24 figures. All of the second group handled all the new examples with +success, and only two of them met with much difficulty in dealing with +the 24 figures. + +Since this decisive experiment, I have heartily recommended the method +of finding relations amongst the numbers themselves, to all who are +proficient in the use of In., Ex., and Con. + +The example of 24 figures must conclude this exposition. They represent +respectively the number of the day of the month in which the first +Saturday in each month falls in 1895 and 1896. To one without practice +in applying analysis to figures, there seems no hope of memorising this +long group of figures except by endless repetition. The 24 figures are + + 522641637527417426415375. + +Yet reflect a moment and all will be clear. Divide the 24 figures into 2 +groups of 12 figures each and number the first group, divided into four +sections, thus:-- + + (1) (2) (3) (4) + 522, 641, 637, 527. + +Now bring the first and fourth groups into relation, and you see at once +that the fourth group is larger than the first group by only _five_. +Bringing the _second_ group into relation with the _third_ group, we +find they differ only by _four_. Again: the third group is larger than +the fourth by 100 and by 10, that is 527 becomes 637, the seven alone +remaining steadfast. Beginning with the fourth group and passing to the +third group we have the fourth group with 110 added. The second group is +the third group with only four added, and the first group is the fourth +group with only five subtracted. Thinking out these relations you can +recall the groups as groups or the separate figures of each group or the +entire 12 figures either forwards or backwards--and you have achieved +this result by _Attention_ and _Thought_. + +The other twelve figures are easily disposed of. They are 417426415375. +Divided into groups of three figures each we have + + (1) (2) (3) (4) + 417 426 415 375. + +Bringing the first group into relation with the third group, we notice +that it is larger by two--and considering the second group with the +fourth group, we find that the second group is as much and one more +above 400 as the fourth is below 400. Other minor matters could be +noticed, as that the first two figures of each group are respectively +41--42--41--37, and that the last figure in each group is 7--6--5--5. +But these relations are hardly worth observing. + +Coming back to the first series, we know that each figure represents +the number of the day of the month to which it belongs on which +the first Saturday in that month falls. The figures for 1895 are +522--641--637--527. The first Saturday in January, 1895, falls on the +_fifth_ day of January, hence the second Saturday must be 5 + 7 = the +12th day of January; the third Saturday the 19th, and the fourth +Saturday 26th. It is easy to know on what day of the _week_ any day in +January falls. Suppose you ask on what week day the 25th of January +falls? You know the 26th is Saturday, and hence the 25th must be the day +preceding the 26th, to wit, Friday, the 25th. Suppose you ask on what +week day the 9th of January falls. You know the 12th is Saturday (the +second Saturday). You now count backward thus: 12 is Saturday, 11 must +be Friday, 10 Thursday, 9 must be Wednesday. The _first_ Saturday in +January, 1895, is the 5th; of February, the 2nd; of March, the 2nd; of +April, the 6th; of May, the 4th, &c., &c. And we can tell on what week +day any day of any of the other months falls. + + +EXERCISES. + +1.--The Ratio of the Circumference of the circle to its diameter is +expressed by the integer 3 and 708 decimals, of which I give only eight. +Learning these nine figures is good practice in numeric +thinking--3.14159265. + +2.--The Yellowstone National Park contains 2,294,740 acres. + +3.--The Monster Chartist Petition contained 3,317,702 names. + + + + +HOW TO LEARN PROSE AND POETRY BY HEART. + +THE ANALYTIC SYNTHETIC METHOD APPLIED TO LONG SENTENCES. + + +How _unobservant_ and wholly _unreliant_ many pupils are may be seen +from the fact that notwithstanding my elaborate handling of the +processes of learning prose and poetry by heart, I often receive +requests to send some indication of how I would learn a particular +chapter or selection by heart! But a chapter consists of paragraphs and +paragraphs of sentences. Learning the desired passages by heart is done +by applying the methods here so profusely illustrated to the successive +sentences of the chapter or selection, until practice and training in +these methods will make their further application unnecessary. + +In pursuance of my plan to keep the mind in an ASSIMILATING condition +when trying to learn and to further aid in making the intellect stay and +work with the senses, I proceed to furnish a Training Method for +committing prose and poetry to memory. + +_Endless repetition or repeating a sentence to be memorised over and +over again_ is the usual process. After one perusal, however, the mind +in such a case has sated its curiosity in regard to the meaning of the +sentence and each subsequent repetition for the purpose of fixing it in +the memory merely makes an impression upon the eye or ear or both, and +the intellect, being unoccupied, naturally wanders away. Hence, learning +by _rote_ promotes _mind-wandering_: for the Attention always wanders +unless wooed to its work by all-engrossing interest in the subject which +in case of a weak power of Attention is rarely sufficient, or by =the +stimulating character of the process of acquirement= which is made use +of. In the Method about to be given, the intellect is agreeably +occupied, and thereby a Habit of Attention is promoted. + +The justification for this Method is found in the Psychological maxim +that the intellect can assimilate a simple idea more easily than a +complex idea, and a few ideas at a time than many ideas. + +The process of this New Method of Decomposition and Recomposition is as +follows:--Find the _shortest sentence or phrase that makes sense_ in the +sentence to be memorised. Add to this short sentence or phrase, +_modifiers_ found in the original sentence, always italicising each new +addition--one at a time--until the original sentence is finally +restored. Suppose we wish to memorise Bacon's definition of education: +"_Education is the cultivation of a just and legitimate familiarity +betwixt the mind and things._" Begin with the briefest sentence and then +go on: 1. Education is cultivation. 2. Education is _the_ cultivation +_of a familiarity_. 3. Education is the cultivation of a familiarity +_betwixt the mind and things_. 4. Education is the cultivation of a +_just_ familiarity betwixt the mind and things. 5. Education is the +cultivation of a just _and legitimate_ familiarity betwixt the mind and +things. In this process, the sentence is first taken to pieces, and then +reconstructed. Finding the lowest terms, "Education is cultivation," we +proceed step by step to add modifiers until the original sentence is +fully restored. + +Each time we make an addition, we recite _so much_ of the original +sentence as has hitherto been used, in connection with the _new +modifiers_ laying _special emphasis_ on the new matter as represented by +the italic words. The intellect is thus kept compulsorily and +delightfully occupied from the start to the finish. It seeks the +shortest phrase or sentence and adds successively all the modifiers, +making no omissions. This analyzing and synthesizing process--_this +taking to pieces and then gradually building up_ the original sentence, +makes a deep and lasting First Impression. + +Every time this method is used the Attention ought to be strengthened +and mind-wandering diminished and the natural Memory strengthened in +both its Stages. + +This process admits usually of several applications in the case of a +long sentence. In the foregoing example, it might have proceeded thus: +1. Education is a familiarity. 2. Education is the familiarity _betwixt +the mind and things_. 3. Education is the _cultivation_ of a familiarity +betwixt the mind and things. 4. Education is the cultivation of _just_ +familiarity betwixt the mind and things. 5. Education is the cultivation +of a just _and legitimate_ familiarity betwixt the mind and things. Or +we might have taken this course: 1. Education is a familiarity. 2. +Education is a familiarity _betwixt the mind and things_. 3. Education +is a _just_ familiarity betwixt the mind and things. 4. Education is a +just _and legitimate_ familiarity betwixt the mind and things. 5. +Education is _the cultivation_ of a just and legitimate familiarity +betwixt the mind and things. + + 1. To keep the mind in an assimilating condition, what method is + furnished? + 2. What is the usual process of memorising prose and poetry? + 3. After one perusal in such a process what takes place? + 4. Does learning by rote promote mind-wandering? + 5. Does not the attention always wander unless wooed to its work by + great interest in the subject dealt with, or by the method of + learning which is given? + 6. How is the intellect occupied by using my method? + 7. Is the habit of Attention also promoted? + 8. Where is the justification of this method found? + 9. Can the intellect assimilate a simple idea more easily than a + complex idea? + 10. Describe the process of learning by the Analytic Synthetic + Method. + + +ANOTHER EXAMPLE FULLY WORKED OUT. + +"Attention is the will directing the intellect into some particular +channel and keeping it there." 1. Attention is the will. 2. Attention is +the will _directing the intellect_. 3. Attention is the will directing +the intellect _into a channel_. 4. Attention is the will directing the +intellect into _some_ channel. 5. Attention is the will directing the +intellect into some _particular_ channel. 6. Attention is the will +directing the intellect into some particular channel _and keeping it +there_. Or we may take this course: 1. Attention is directing the +intellect. 2. Attention is directing the intellect _into a channel_. 3. +Attention is directing the intellect into _some_ channel. 4. Attention +is directing the intellect into some _particular_ channel. 5. Attention +is directing the intellect into some particular channel _and keeping it +there_. 6. Attention is the _will_ directing the intellect into some +particular channel and keeping it there. + + +A LONG LEGAL DEFINITION. + +"An estate upon condition is one which depends upon the happening or not +happening of some uncertain event whereby the estate may be either +originally created or enlarged or finally defeated." + +1. An estate is one. 2. An estate _upon condition_ is one. 3. An estate +upon condition is one _which depends upon the happening of some event_. +4. An estate upon condition is one which depends upon the happening _or +not happening_ of some event. 5. An estate upon condition is one which +depends upon the happening or not happening of some _uncertain_ event. +6. An estate upon condition is one which depends upon the happening or +not happening of some uncertain event _whereby the estate may be created +or enlarged or defeated_. 7. An estate upon condition is one which +depends upon the happening or not happening of some uncertain event +whereby the estate may be _either_ created or enlarged or defeated. 8. +An estate upon condition is one which depends upon the happening or not +happening of some uncertain event whereby the estate may be either +_originally_ created or enlarged or defeated. 9. An estate upon +condition is one which depends upon the happening or not happening of +some uncertain event whereby the estate may be either originally created +or enlarged or _finally_ defeated. + + 1. In this process, what is first done with a sentence? + 2. After a sentence is thus taken to pieces, what is then done with + it? + 3. How do we proceed after finding the lowest terms? + 4. Do we revive any part of the original sentence each time we make + an addition? + 5. How much of it? + 6. Is the intellect kept occupied in this way? + 7. Does this not make a deep and lasting first impression? + 8. Every time this is used what should be the result? + 9. Should the natural Memory be strengthened in both stages? + 10. Does this process admit of more than one application in the + case of a long sentence? + + +MODERATION ADVISED. + +The practice of the above method is so attractive to a beginner when it +is applied to single sentences, that he is apt to work at it too long +at a time. Let him not at the outset analyse and reconstruct more than +from 3 to 4 sentences at one sitting or lesson, but let him do what he +attempts in the most thorough manner, and after a time he will not find +it necessary to apply this method in future memorisations. + + +EXAMPLES FOR PRACTICE. + +1. A bachelor is a wild goose that tame geese envy. + +2. Law is a trap baited with promise of benefit or revenge. + +3. Conversation is the idle man's business and the business man's +recreation. + +4. Attention is adjusting the observer to the object in order to seize +it in its unity and diversity. + +5. Assimilative Memory is the Habit of so receiving and absorbing +impressions and ideas that they or their representatives shall be ready +for revival or recall whenever wanted. + + +INTERROGATIVE ANALYSIS USED FOR SHORT SENTENCES. + +Interrogative Analysis or intellectual Inquisition is another and most +effective mode of inciting the intellect to pass from a passive into an +active =assimilating= condition when trying to learn by heart as well as +to help create the habit of the intellect staying with the senses. The +process consists of two parts: (1) _To not only ask a question on every +important word in the sentence to be memorised_, but, (2) _to repeat the +entire sentence in reply to each question, while specially emphasising_ +that word of the sentence which constitutes the _answer_ to the +question. Take the passage from Byron:-- + + "Man! + Thou pendulum 'twixt a smile and tear." + +1. _Who_ is a pendulum 'twixt a smile and tear? "_Man!_ thou pendulum +'twixt a smile and tear." 2. What function does man perform 'twixt a +smile and tear? "Man! thou _pendulum_ 'twixt a smile and tear." 3. +'Twixt a tear and what else is man said to be a pendulum? "Man! thou +pendulum 'twixt a _smile_ and tear." 4. 'Twixt a smile and what else is +man said to be a pendulum? "Man! thou pendulum 'twixt a smile _and +tear_." 5. By what word is the relation between "pendulum" and "a smile +and tear" described? "Man! thou pendulum _'twixt_ a smile and tear." 6. +Is the pendulum which man is said to be 'twixt a smile and tear +addressed in the first, second, or third person? "Man! _thou_ pendulum +'twixt a smile and tear." + +The pupils will see that the above method is fundamentally unlike the +ordinary question and answer method. In the latter procedure, a question +is asked and the answer is given by "yes" or "no," or by the use of one +or more words of the sentence. To illustrate: What is "man" called in +this passage? Ans. A pendulum. What swings betwixt a smile and tear? +Ans. A pendulum, &c., &c. + + 1. Define Interrogative Analysis. + 2. What does it incite the intellect to do? + 3. What does the process consist of? What are they? + +But in my Method the aim is _to repeat as much of the sentence as is +possible informing the question and the whole of it in each reply_; and +in _question and reply_ the _word_ that _constitutes the point of both_ +is to be especially _emphasized_, and in this way _the mind is exercised +on each word of the sentence twice_ (once in question and once in +answer), and _each word of the sentence is emphasized in reference to +the whole of the sentence_. And in all these separate steps it is +impossible for the mind to remain in a passive state, but must be +_active_ and _absorbing_ throughout, and thereby a most vivid =first +impression= is secured, and the remembrance of it assured. + +Besides the habit of exhaustively considering and weighing a sentence +which is created by this method, it not only secures the faithful +recollection of the passages to which it is applied, but it gives +another great advantage. What usually makes a person dull in +conversation? Setting aside timidity, we find that well-informed persons +are sometimes good listeners, but no talkers. Why is this? In +conversation their minds are apt to remain in a _recipient passive_ +state. Hence no trains of thought arise in their own minds. And having +nothing in their minds which seeks utterance, they remain quiet. Now the +practice of Interrogative Analysis compels such persons to +interrogate--to propose questions--to think. And when such mental +activity becomes strong, it will break out in conversations by +interrogatories and critical and often original interesting remarks. + + 1. Is this method like the ordinary question and answer method? + 2. How are answers given in the latter procedure? + 3. What is the aim in my method? + 4. How much of the sentence is repeated in each reply given to the + question? + 5. What word is to be especially emphasised? + 6. How often is the mind exercised on each word of the sentence? + 7. In all of these separate steps, is it possible for the mind to + remain in a passive state? Must it not be active and absorbing + throughout? + +Teachers often complain that they can never induce some of their pupils +to ask questions on their tasks. The reason is that their pupils remain +in a passive state of mind. Had they been thoroughly drilled in +Interrogative Analysis as I teach it, they would quickly have questions +to ask on all subjects. + +I show them _how_ to interrogate. They cannot help practising this +method. They commence with the first word of a sentence and go on to the +last. And from the numerous examples I give, they see exactly how this +is to be done in all other cases. But if I had merely told them to ask +questions on the sentence to be learned, they would have had no guide or +rule of procedure to follow. As I fully illustrate my Method the pupil +at once knows how to proceed, and he gains confidence in his ability to +use the method every time he tries it, and at length the Habit of active +thinking has been formed, and he is almost sure to be an interrogator +and thinker on all subjects. + + 1. What is thereby secured? + 2. Is the remembrance of the first impression assured? + 3. What other great advantage does the method of Interrogative + Analysis give? + 4. Are all well-informed persons good talkers? + 5. If not, why? + 6. In conversation, in what state are their minds apt to remain? + 7. Do any trains of thought arise in their own minds? + 8. What does the practice of Interrogative Analysis compel such + persons to do? + 9. What do teachers often complain of? + 10. What is the cause? + 11. What does my method show them? + 12. Can they help practising it? + 13. Do I not fully illustrate my method? + 14. Does not the pupil gain confidence by practising this method? + 15. Does not the habit of active thinking thereby grow upon him? + +The following sentence will be made use of as an example for practice. I +deal with it by the Analytic-Synthetic, and also by the Interrogative +Analysis methods. + + "The Devil hath not, in all his quiver's choice, + An arrow for the heart like a sweet voice!" + +1. The Devil hath an arrow. 2. The Devil hath _not_ an arrow. 3. The +Devil hath not an arrow _for the heart_. 4. The Devil hath not an arrow +for the heart _like a voice_. 5. The Devil hath not an arrow for the +heart like a _sweet_ voice. 6. The Devil hath not, _in his choice_, an +arrow for the heart like a sweet voice. 7. The Devil hath not, in his +_quiver's_ choice, an arrow for the heart like a sweet voice. 8. The +Devil hath not, in _all_ his quiver's choice, an arrow for the heart +like a sweet voice. + + +THE SAME BY INTERROGATIVE ANALYSIS. + +1. _Who_ hath not in all his quiver's choice an arrow for the heart like +a sweet voice? The _Devil_ hath not, in all his quiver's choice, an +arrow for the heart like a sweet voice. 2. Hath the Devil in all his +quiver's choice an arrow for the heart like a sweet voice? The Devil +hath _not_, in all his quiver's choice, an arrow for the heart like a +sweet voice. 3. What hath not the Devil in all his quiver's choice for +the heart? The Devil hath not, in all his quiver's choice, _an arrow_ +for the heart like a sweet voice. 4. For what hath not the Devil in all +his quiver's choice an arrow like a sweet voice? The Devil hath not, in +all his quiver's choice, an arrow _for the heart_ like a sweet voice. 5. +Like what sweet thing hath not the Devil in all his quiver's choice an +arrow for the heart? The Devil hath not, in all his quiver's choice, an +arrow for the heart _like a sweet voice_. 6. Like what kind of a voice +hath not the Devil in all his quiver's choice an arrow for the heart? +The Devil hath not, in all his quiver's choice, an arrow for the heart +like a _sweet voice_. + + "A bad workman blames his tools." + +Who blames his tools? A _bad workman_ blames his tools. What kind of a +workman blames his tools? A _bad_ workman blames his tools. What bad man +blames his tools? A bad _workman_ blames his tools. How does a bad +workman treat his tools? A bad workman _blames_ his tools. Whose tools +does a bad workman blame? A bad workman blames _his_ tools. What things +belonging to a bad workman does he blame? A bad workman blames his +_tools_. + + "Judgments draw interest at six per cent." + +What draw interest? _Judgments_ draw interest at six per cent. How do +judgments operate on interest? Judgments _draw_ interest at six +per cent. What do judgments draw? Judgments draw _interest_ at six +per cent. At what rate do judgments draw interest? Judgments draw +interest at _six_ per cent. A part of what sum is the interest of six +dollars which judgments draw? Judgments draw interest at six _per cent_. + + "Effort is the price of success." + +What is the price of success? _Effort_ is the price of success. Was +effort the price of success? Effort _is_ the price of success. What +bearing has effort on success? Effort is _the price_ of success. Effort +is the price of what? Effort is the price of _success_. + + "Truth seldom goes without a scratched face." + +What seldom goes without a scratched face? _Truth_ seldom goes without a +scratched face. Does truth ever go without a scratched face? Truth +_seldom_ goes without a scratched face. What does truth seldom do +without a scratched face? Truth seldom _goes_ without a scratched face. +Does truth seldom go with a scratched face? Truth seldom goes _without_ +a scratched face. Truth seldom goes without what? Truth seldom goes +without a _scratched face_. What kind of a face is spoken of? Truth +seldom goes without a _scratched_ face. Without what scratched thing +does truth seldom go? Truth seldom goes without a scratched _face_. + + +EXAMPLES FOR PRACTICE. + + 1. Instinct is inherited memory. + 2. Books are embalmed minds. + 3. Words are the fortresses of thought. + 4. A name denotes objects and connotes attributes. + 5. Force is depersonalised will. + 6. A somnambule only acts his dream. + 7. Attention is fixation of consciousness. + 8. Science is organised common sense. + +The student of Interrogative Analysis can apply this method to the +examples given under the Analytic-Synthetic Method. This will give the +needful additional practice. But let him not attempt too much at any one +time. Three to four examples thoroughly studied are quite sufficient for +one session or sitting. + + +POEMS LONG OR SHORT EASILY LEARNED BY HEART. + +POE'S "BELLS." + +1. Before attempting to memorize any selections of Prose or Poetry, +never fail _first to read it carefully_ to ascertain what it is all +about, to learn its aim and _mode of development_ and its +_peculiarities_, and not least of all, to look up and note down in +writing the _meaning of unfamiliar_ words. + +2. In this poem the average reader might have to consult the dictionary +for the precise meaning of "Crystalline" [clear, unalloyed], "Runic" +[old-fashioned, mystical], "Tintinnabulation" [bell-ringing], "Monody" +[a monotonous sound], "Ghouls" [imaginary evil beings supposed to prey +upon human bodies], and "Paean" [a song of triumph]. The pupil should +understand that except in the rare cases where mere sound helps us, we +learn wholly through the _meaning_ of the words and their _relations_ +between the meanings, and therefore if he fails to know the import of +any word or words in a selection, he cannot receive the full benefit of +the methods taught in this System. + +3. The reader finds that there are four stanzas in this poem, each +dealing with a different kind of bell, _viz._: Silver, Golden, Brazen +and Iron bells. + +4. It is always best to fix in memory the order of paragraphs or of +stanzas the moment the opportunity occurs for that purpose, and here, +before attempting to memorise the stanzas themselves, let the order of +them be fixed. + +5. The order of the bells is first "silver," second "golden," third +"brazen," and fourth "iron." How establish this order in mind? Silver +and gold are the precious metals used for coins. They occur here in the +order of their value, "silver" being first and the cheaper, and "gold" +the second and the most valuable of all. Next we have "brazen," which +resembles "gold" in colour, and fourth and last we have "iron," the +cheapest of the four--silver, gold, brass and iron. If this analysis of +the order of the subject-matter of the stanzas is retained, the student +is ready to take account of other things which his first perusal of the +poem has taught him. + +6. Before doing so, however, let us notice a method of the old +Mnemonics, which is still taught and which should never be resorted to. +It is their story-telling method. A story or narrative is invented for +the purpose of helping the student, as it is claimed, to memorise it. In +this poem we find there are four stanzas, each occupied with a different +kind of bell. To help remember that the order of the bells is silver, +gold, brass and iron, the old Mnemonics advises us to invent a +story--the following will answer: A couple of lovers once took a +sleigh-ride, the horses carrying _silver_ bells. After a time they +marry, when wedding or _golden_ bells are used. Later on their house is +on fire, when alarm or _brazen_ bells are brought into requisition, and +last of all, one of the couple dies, when the _iron_ bells were tolled. + +Whilst such a method is a novelty to the student, he might tolerate it +as such, but as a memory-aid it is always unreliable, since it is +something _in addition_ to the matter to be remembered and forming no +part of it, the invented story, if remembered at all, is apt to be +recalled as an integral part of the selection itself. + +7. In this first perusal the reader has noticed that there is a _certain +uniformity of construction_ in the first line of each stanza, as in the +first stanza we have: "Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells;" +in the second, "Hear the mellow wedding bells--golden bells;" in the +third, "Hear the loud alarum bells--brazen bells;" and in the fourth and +last, "Hear the tolling of the bells--iron bells." + +8. The reader has also observed that the second line in each stanza +contains a reflection in the form of an exclamation on the function or +result of the uses of the bells spoken of, as in the second line of the +first stanza we see: "What a world of merriment their melody foretells;" +in the second stanza the second line gives us, "What a world of +happiness their harmony foretells;" the second line of the third stanza +reads as follows: "What a tale of terror, now, their turbulency tells;" +and in the fourth stanza the second line runs thus: "What a world of +solemn thought their monody compels." + +9. Other points of resemblance [In.], or of unlikeness [Ex.], were +noticed in the reader's first perusal of this poem, and these, as well +as those already remarked upon, will greatly facilitate his learning the +exact language of each stanza. + +10. Now comes the _test_. It is often said that habit is "second" +nature. The Duke of Wellington more truly said: "Habit is _ten times_ +nature." The reader early acquired the habit of learning prose and +poetry by the _rote_ method--the method of repeating the sentences over +and over again almost endlessly till ear or eye retains the exact +language. + +Now, if the reader has gained a _clear conception_ of the +Analytic-Synthetic and Interrogative Analysis methods, he is sure to be +convinced of their undoubted superiority to the _rote_ method. And if he +must needs learn Poe's "Bells" before to-morrow night, he would probably +spend most of the intervening time in trying to learn it by the +discredited _rote_ method, and most likely fail in the attempt, while he +is satisfied in theory that he could memorise it by one of my methods in +three hours, or in half of that time. The difficulty in his case is to +induce him to exert his willpower long enough to practise my methods in +learning not a few detached sentences, but an entire poem of 50 or 200 +lines; but if he does this in one instance, he effectually breaks down +the old bad habit of endless unassimilating repetition and introduces a +good habit instead. He will then learn Poe's "Bells" by my methods in +one-tenth, if not one-fiftieth, part of the time it would take him to do +it by the _rote_ method. + +11. I here produce the poem in the hope that every one who studies my +System will learn it by the Analytic-Synthetic method, and when he has +learned the first stanza he should then glance at my Analysis of it +which follows the poem and compare his work with mine. Let him then +learn the rest of the poem--and thereafter, as a genuine exercise of +his _reviving_ power and as a training in attention, let him recall it +as often as once a week for as many weeks as his desire for improvement +continues, or until the recital of it becomes merely automatic. + + +THE BELLS. + + Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle, in the icy air of night! + While the stars that oversprinkle + All the heavens seem to twinkle with a crystalline delight; + Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + To the tintinnabulation that so musically wells + From the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + From the jingling and the tinkling of the bells. + + Hear the mellow wedding-bells, golden bells! + What a world of happiness their harmony foretells-- + Through the balmy air of night how they ring out their delight! + From the molten-golden notes, and all in tune, + What a liquid ditty floats + To the turtle-dove that listens, while she gloats on the moon! + Oh, from out the sounding cells, + What a gush of euphony voluminously wells! + How it swells! how it dwells + On the Future! how it tells of the rapture that impels + To the swinging and the ringing of the bells, bells, bells-- + Of the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + To the rhyming and the chiming of the bells! + + Hear the loud alarum bells--brazen bells! + What a tale of terror, now, their turbulency tells! + In the startled ear of night + How they scream out their affright! + Too much horrified to speak, + They can only shriek, shriek, out of tune, + In a clamorous appealing to the mercy of the fire, + In a mad expostulation with the deaf and frantic fire + Leaping higher, higher, higher, with a desperate desire, + And a resolute endeavor now--now to sit or never, + By the side of the pale-faced moon. Oh, the bells, bells, bells! + What a tale their terror tells of despair! + How they clang, and clash, and roar! What a horror they outpour + On the bosom of the palpitating air! + Yet the air, it fully knows, + By the twanging and the clanging, + How the danger ebbs and flows; yet the ear distinctly tells + In the jangling and the wrangling, + How the danger sinks and swells, + By the sinking or the swelling in the anger of the bells--of the + bells-- + Of the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + In the clamor and the clangor of the bells! + + Hear the tolling of the bells--iron bells! + What a world of solemn thought their monody compels! + In the silence of the night, + How we shiver with affright + At the melancholy menace of their tone! + For every sound that floats + From the rust within their throats is a groan. + And the people--ah, the people-- + They that dwell up in the steeple, all alone! + And who tolling, tolling, tolling, in that muffled monotone, + Feel a glory in so rolling on the human heart a stone-- + They are neither man nor woman-- + They are neither brute nor human--they are Ghouls: + And their king it is who tolls; + And he rolls, rolls, rolls, rolls a paean from the bells! + And his merry bosom swells with the paean of the bells! + And he dances and he yells; + Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + To the paean of the bells--of the bells; + Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + To the throbbing of the bells--of the bells, bells, bells, + To the sobbing of the bells; keeping time, time, time, + As he knells, knells, knells, in a happy Runic rhyme, + To the rolling of the bells--of the bells, bells, bells-- + To the tolling of the bells, of the bells, bells, bells, bells, + bells, bells, bells-- + To the moaning and the groaning of the bells. + + EDGAR A. POE. + + +APPLICATION OF THE ANALYTIC-SYNTHETIC METHOD. + +This method can be applied in several different ways according to the +idiosyncrasies of different students. One way is as follows:--"Hear the +sledges with the bells--silver bells." Applying this method, we have--1. +Hear the sledges; 2. Hear the sledges _with the bells_; 3. Hear the +sledges with the bells--_bells_; 4. Hear the sledges with the +bells--_silver_ bells. Or, if we use the Interrogatory Analysis Method +we could proceed thus: 1. What act of the mind do we exercise in regard +to the sledges with the bells--silver bells? "_Hear_ the sledges with +the bells--silver bells." 2. What kind of a vehicle do we hear with the +bells? "Hear _the sledges_ with the bells--silver bells." 3. What is it +we hear in connection with the sledges? "Hear the sledges with _the +bells_--silver _bells_." 4. What kind of bells do we hear? "Hear the +sledges with the bells--_silver_ bells." + +We advance to the second line, which is a reflection on the facts stated +in the first line. The two lines are thus connected through the +operation of cause, or occasion. [Con.] "What a world of merriment their +melody foretells." We will henceforth only use the Analytic-Synthetic +Method. 1. Melody foretells. 2. _Their_ melody foretells. 3. _What +merriment_ their melody foretells. 4. What _a world_ of merriment their +melody foretells. Having seen that the second line grows out of the +first, and having memorised both we can recall them together thus: + + 1. Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + 2. What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + +The third line runs thus: "How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle in the icy +air of night." Melody means "a succession of agreeable musical sounds." +It is a general term--"tinkle, tinkle, tinkle," means a species of +musical sounds, the sounds of the bells. Thus we see that these two +lines bear towards each other the relation of genus and species. This +relation carefully noticed will tend to hold the lines together. Let us +now apply our Method: 1. They tinkle. 2. They tinkle _in the night_. 3. +_How_ they tinkle in the night. 4. How they tinkle, _tinkle_ in the +night. 5. How they tinkle, tinkle, _tinkle_ in the night. 6. How they +tinkle, tinkle, tinkle, in the _air of_ night. 7. How they tinkle, +tinkle, tinkle in the _icy_ air of night. Now let us recall all the +lines together, thus: + + 1. Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + 2. What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + 3. How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle in the icy air of night! + +The fourth line being very short had better be memorised in connection +with the fifth line, and in the expression of the Analysis, we can print +the first word of the fifth line with a capital letter. The two lines +are: + + 4. While the stars that oversprinkle + 5. All the heavens, seem to twinkle with a crystalline delight. + +Before proceeding we may notice "night" of the third line is directly +connected with "stars" of the fourth line by Concurrence. This observed +relation will tend to cement the lines together. Using our Method we +say: 1. Stars oversprinkle. 2. _While the_ stars oversprinkle. 3. While +the stars oversprinkle _the heavens_. 4. While the stars oversprinkle +_All the heavens_. 5. While the stars _that_ oversprinkle All the +heavens. 6. While the stars that oversprinkle All the heavens _seem to +twinkle_. 7. While the stars that oversprinkle All the heavens seem to +twinkle _with delight_. 8. While the stars that oversprinkle All the +heavens seem to twinkle with a _crystalline_ delight. So far we have +learned the following lines: + + 1. Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + 2. What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + 3. How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle in the icy air of night! + 4. While the stars that oversprinkle + 5. All the heavens, seem to twinkle with a crystalline delight. + +The _sixth_ line is in these words: "Keeping time, time, time, in a sort +of Runic rhyme." We observe that as "time" is here repeated three times, +so "tinkle" was repeated three times in the third line. We must have +observed, too, that it is "stars" of the fourth line that are said to +"twinkle" in the fifth line. The two lines are as closely connected as +grammatical construction and the expression of thought could make them. +And the sixth line is an obvious continuation of the description. +Analytically we say: 1. Keeping time in a rhyme. 2. Keeping time, +_time_, in a rhyme. 3. Keeping time, time, _time_ in a rhyme. 4. Keeping +time, time, time in a _sort_ of rhyme. 5. Keeping time, time, time in a +sort of _Runic_ rhyme. + +Let us now recall the six lines together. + + 1. Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + 2. What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + 3. How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle in the icy air of night! + 4. While the stars that oversprinkle + 5. All the heavens, seem to twinkle with a crystalline delight; + 6. Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme. + +The seventh line is the continuation of the sixth. Keeping time to what? +"To the tintinnabulation that so musically wells." 1. The +tintinnabulation wells. 2. The tintinnabulation _that_ wells. 3. The +tintinnabulation that _musically_ wells. 4. The tintinnabulation that +_so_ musically wells. 5. _To_ the tintinnabulation that so musically +wells. Wells from what? From the bells, bells--occurring altogether six +times more. This makes the eighth line. But some pupils say at once, "I +can never be sure in reciting the line to recall bells only seven times, +no more or less." These pupils will admit that they can be sure to say +bells _four_ times, as bells, bells, bells, bells. Then, of course, they +can say bells _three_ times more, making seven times altogether. Here, +then, we have the seventh and eighth lines, as follows: + + 7. To the tintinnabulation that so musically wells + 8. From the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + +The ninth line is--"From the jingling and the tinkling of the bells." + +In the eighth line we have "bells" seven times repeated in all--bells +being taken in their utmost generality, viz., _musical_ action. But in +the ninth or last line we have the very specific action of the bells, to +wit: "From the _jingling_ and the _tinkling_ of the bells." We can make +a short analysis, which is always better than unthinking repetition, as: +1. From the bells. 2. From the _jingling_ of the bells. 3. From the +jingling _and the tinkling_ of the bells. The seventh, eighth, and ninth +lines are as follows: + + 7. To the tintinnabulation that so musically wells + 8. From the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + 9. From the jingling and the tinkling of the bells. + +Having already learned the first six lines, we have but to preface these +last three by the previous six, and we have the first stanza as +follows:-- + + 1. Hear the sledges with the bells--silver bells-- + 2. What a world of merriment their melody foretells! + 3. How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle in the icy air of night! + 4. While the stars that oversprinkle + 5. All the heavens, seem to twinkle with a crystalline delight; + 6. Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + 7. To the tintinnabulation that so musically wells + 8. From the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells-- + 9. From the jingling and the tinkling of the bells. + +In a similar manner, the pupil can memorise the three remaining stanzas. + +Having heretofore learned the order of the four different kinds of +bells, and having dealt with the first or "silver" bells, we know that +the next or second stanza is concerned with the "golden" bells. +Similarly, when we finish the second stanza, we know that the third +stanza deals with the "brazen" bells, and the last with the "iron" +bells. + +No further hints need be offered except perhaps in regard to the last +ten lines of the last stanza. + +Notice the coincidences, the resemblances, or Inclusions, the +Exclusions, and the Concurrences. "Keeping time, time, time, in a sort +of Runic rhyme," occurs three times--but on the third appearance of that +phrase, there is a change which must be observed; for it bears this +form: "Keeping time, time, time, _as he knells, knells, knells, in a +happy_ Runic rhyme." But the main difficulty with most students seems to +be to remember _the number of times_ the word "bells" is repeated in the +different lines. We must keep to the text and not resort to any foreign +matter to help the feeble memory. The words _paean_, _throbbing_, +_sobbing_, _rolling_ and _tolling_ occur in the lines where the "bells" +are mentioned (except in that next to the last line, where "bells" +occurs three times, and there is no other word in that line), and in the +last line "bells" is found once, and the words "moaning" and "groaning" +appear. Memorise these seven words by Analysis, to wit: paean, throbbing, +sobbing, rolling, tolling, moaning and groaning. Thus _paean_--a song of +triumph--might cause heart _throbbing_, an inward act accompanied in the +present instance by _sobbing_, and this outward manifestation of grief +would be intensified by the _rolling_ of the bells and their _tolling_. +_Moaning_ and _groaning_ are figurative expressions for the moaning and +groaning of the mourners. + +Now the figures 2, 4, 1, 4, 8, 1 (easily learned by analysis as 2, 4, 1 +and 4, 8, 1, or 2, 4 with 1 following, and 4, 8, with 1 following, or 2, +4 with 1 following, and [double 2, 4] 4, 8 and 1 following) give the +_number of times_ the word "bells" occurs in connection with the words +just learned. Opposite the line where _tolling_ occurs we have marked 8, +since "bells" occurs in that line five times and three times in the +next line, where no other word is found. + + Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + 2. To the _paean_ of the bells--of the bells; + Keeping time, time, time, in a sort of Runic rhyme, + 4. To the _throbbing_ of the bells, of the bells, bells, bells, + 1. To the _sobbing_ of the bells; keeping time, time, time, + As he knells, knells, knells, in a happy Runic rhyme, + 4. To the _rolling_ of the bells, of the bells, bells, bells, + 8. To the _tolling_ of the bells, of the bells, bells, bells, bells, + Bells, bells, bells; + 1. To the _moaning_ and the _groaning_ of the bells. + +Carrying these suggestions to the text, they help fix the exact number +of times the word "bells" occurs in each line. There are other +legitimate ways to assist a poor memory to master these lines, but +whatever is done let no one ever think of resorting to the unthoughtive, +brainless process of endless repetition. + +Poe's "Bells," being a difficult selection to learn, furnishes, as all +difficult selections do, numerous opportunities for applying Analysis to +fix the lines in memory. Hence it should be _mastered_ and often recited +by all who would learn to memorise poetry or prose, in, at the very +least, _one-fifth_ of the time required by the old mind-wandering +process of _rote_ learning. + + + + +ANALYTIC SUBSTITUTIONS. + +ANOTHER METHOD FOR REMEMBERING DATES AND FIGURES. + + +This lesson in figures is given for the benefit of those who have not +yet mastered NUMERIC THINKING. The pupil will appreciate its practical +value the moment he masters the key to it. + +This is given in the next few pages, and it will be found to be easy of +comprehension and interesting to a surprising degree. + +The whole thing is in a nutshell. Numbers, as such, are abstractions and +hard to be remembered. To make them hard to forget, we translate them +into words or phrases. These are easily remembered and they always +instantly _give back_ the figures they stand for. + +We represent the figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 0, by certain +_consonants_; and then, as the vowels [a, e, i, o, u, and y, together +with w] have _no numerical_ value assigned to them, we turn dates or any +numbers into translating _words_, which will always tell us precisely +the figures the words stand for. + +As this simple process enables us to remember any dates or numbers with +_absolute certainty_, the pupil will be pleased to know that he can +learn _how it is done_ by only _one thoughtful_ perusal. + +The questions at the bottom of each page constitute an invaluable aid to +test the accuracy of his knowledge and the correctness of his +inferences. + + 1. Is it possible to exaggerate the importance of this lesson? + 2. When will the pupil appreciate its practical value? + 3. Where is this key given? + 4. Are numbers hard to remember? + 5. How do we make them hard to forget? + 6. By what are the figures represented? + 7. What letters have no numerical value assigned to them? + 8. What do the questions at the bottom of each page constitute? + +The nought and the nine digits are _represented_ by the following +_consonants_ when they are _sounded_ or _pronounced_; viz., 0 (nought) +by s, z, or c^soft as in cease, 1 by t, th, or d, 2 by n, 3 by m, 4 by +r, 5 by l, 6 by sh, j, ch, or g^soft as in the first g of George, 7 +g^hard as in Gorge, k, c^hard as in _c_ane, q, or ng, 8 by f or v, and 9 +by b or p. + +Ample practice in translating the sounded consonants of words into +figures, or of figures into the sounded consonants of words will now be +given. If the reader can _remember_ the foregoing consonant equivalents +of figures in connection with the tabulated Figure Alphabet on the 74th +page of this lesson, he can at once pass on through the book. If not, he +must carefully study the intervening pages with painstaking--for when +once learned, no further difficulty can arise. + +The tabulated Figure Alphabet on the 74th page of this lesson expresses +the consonant values of the nought and nine digits in perpendicular +columns, as under nought (0) are placed _s_, _z_, and _c_^soft; under +nine are placed _b_ and _p_; under six are placed _sh_, _j_, _ch_, and +_g_^soft, &c. Only those who possess first-rate natural memories can +learn the equivalents of the sounded consonants in figures from this +table. But when learned in this way, the pupil requires much practice in +translating words into figures and figures into words. Even this +exceptional pupil had better carefully study the ensuing examples. + +The first thing to be done is to learn _which_ consonants are used to +stand for and represent the nought (0) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. +Let the student remember that we use vowels to make words with, but we +do not give the vowels [a, e, i, o, u], or w, or y, _any number value +whatever_. + +WE REPRESENT THE NOUGHT OR CYPHER [0] BY THE CONSONANTS S, Z, OR C^soft +[AS IN _CEASE_]. + +The figure value of "sew," therefore equals or is represented by a +cipher [0]. S = 0, and the vowel "e" and the consonant "w" have _no figure +value_. Cannot the student understand at once that {S}ay = 0, +{S}ee = 0, Ea{s}e = 0, I{s} = 0, and {Z}oe = 0, and {S}ei{z}e = 00, +{S}i{z}e = 00, {S}au{c}e = 00? + +The following is another way of fixing in mind this first rule. + +If the capital letter =S= were cut into two parts, and the bottom half +attached to the top half, it would make a nought (=0=). _So it is easy to +remember that S represents =0=._ C^soft as in _cease_ has the same sound +as S, and should therefore stand for the same figure, _viz._, 0; and Z +is a cognate of S--that is, it is _made by the same organs of speech in +the same position_ as when making S, only it is an undertone, and S is a +whispered letter. Besides Z should represent =0= because it begins the +word Zero--C^soft should also stand for =0= for the additional reason that +C^soft begins the word cipher. _In translating a word into figures we +always turn S, Z, or C^soft into nought (0); in turning figures into +words we always translate a nought (0) into S, Z, or C^soft._ + + 1. What is the first thing to be done? + 2. What must the student remember in connection with vowels? + 3. By what do we represent the cipher? + 4. What other way is given for fixing the first rule in the mind? + 5. What is meant by a "cognate"? + 6. What kind of a letter is S? + +1 IS REPRESENTED BY THE CONSONANT "T," "TH," OR "D." + +{T}oy = 1. As "t" stands for 1, and o and y are vowels, and have no +figure value, the numerical value of Toy _must_ be 1. + +{Th}ee = 1, {Th}ou = 1, {D}ay = 1, {D}ew = 1, {Th}i{s} = 10, +{Th}u{s} = 10, {D}oe{s} = 10, {T}ie{s} = 10, {T}oe{s} = 10, +{D}ee{d} = 11, {D}o{th} = 11, {T}o-{d}ay = 11, {T}a{t}too[B] = 11, +{T}u{t} = 11, {T}oa{d} = 11, {T}ie{d} = 11, {S}a{t} = 01, {S}ai{d} = 01, +{S}ea{t}= 01, {D}ay{s} = 10, {T}oy{s} = 10, {Th}e{s}e = 10, +{Th}o{s}e = 10. + +[B] See rules on page 72. + +"t" stands for 1, because it is made with _one_ downward stroke. "h" has +no figure value except when it is united with "s" or "c" in sh or ch, +and therefore "th" _must_ represent 1, and d, being the cognate of "t," +it is represented by 1. Hence we translate "t," "th," and "d" by the +figure 1, and when we want to represent 1, by letters, we translate it +into t, th, or d. + +2 IS REPRESENTED BY "N," because it is made by two downward strokes. +{N}o = 2, A{n}y = 2, O{n}e = 2, {N}oi{s}e = 20, {N}i{c}e = 20, +{N}e{s}{t} = 201, {N}o{t}e = 21, {Th}e{n} = 12, {N}u{n} = 22, +{N}a{n} = 22, {S}o{n} = 02, {S}i{n}e = 02, {Z}o{n}e = 02, {N}i{n}e = 22, +{Z}e{n}o = 02, {S}ow{n} = 02. + +3 IS REPRESENTED BY "M," because the written m is made by _three_ +downward strokes. Ai{m} = 3, {S}u{m} = 03, {M}u{m} = 33, {M}ai{m} = 33, +{M}o{n}ey = 32, {M}o{th} = 31, {M}oo{n} = 32, {M}a{n} = 32, +{M}o{n}{th} = 321, A{m}e{n}{d}{s} = 3210, {Th}i{n} = 12, E{n}e{m}ie{s} += 230, Ho{m}e = 3. + +4 IS REPRESENTED BY "R," because it terminates the word _four_ in +several languages. Ai{r} = 4. A and i are vowels, and count for no figure +value in Air, and hence that word represents only the figure 4. Wi{r}e = 4, +{R}ow = 4, Wo{r}{t} = 41, W{r}a{th} = 41, Wo{r}{th} = 41, {R}i{d}e = 41, +Hei{r}{s} = 40, {R}ui{n}{s} = 420, {R}oa{s}{t} = 401, {R}u{m} = 43, +{R}oa{r} = 44, {S}au{c}e{r} = 004, {S}wo{r}{d}{s}{m}a{n} = 041032, +{R}a{z}o{r}{s} = 4040, A{r}i{s}e{n} = 402, He{r}{m}i{t}{s} = 4310. + + 1. In translating a word into figures, what do we always do? + 2. By what letters is the figure 1 represented? + 3. Why does "t" stand for 1? + 4. When does the letter "h" have a figure value? + 5. By what is 2 represented? + 6. Why? + 7. How do we represent 3? + 8. Why? + 9. By what consonant is 4 represented? + 10. Why? + +5 IS REPRESENTED BY "L," because in the Roman alphabet L stood for 50, +and we disregard the cipher and make it stand for 5 only--as, Oi{l} = 5. +O and i, being vowels, may be _used_ in a word, but having no figure +value, do not change the numerical value of the word; therefore the +figure value of "oi{l}" is 5, the same as though the "l" stood alone. +{L}ay = 5, {L}aw = 5, Ho{l}y = 5, Awhi{l}e = 5, Whee{l} = 5, +{L}i{t} = 51, Wea{lth} = 51, {L}a{d} = 51, {S}o{l}o = 05, +{S}a{l}e{s} = 050, {S}{l}owe{r} = 054, {L}a{n}e = 52, A{l}o{n}e = 52, +{L}a{m}a = 53, Ea{r}{l}ie{r} = 454, Who{l}e{s}a{l}e = 505, +U{n}{m}i{l}i{t}a{r}y{n}e{s}s = 2351420. + +6 IS REPRESENTED BY "SH," "J," "CH," AND "G^soft." WE HAVE THE LETTER +VALUES OF 6, THROUGH THE INITIAL CONSONANTS OF THE PHRASE: (Six), {Sh}y +{J}ewesses {Ch}ose {G}eorge. In the following words, the vowels have no +figure value, hence in translation are never counted. {Sh}ow = 6, +{J}oy = 6, Ha{tch} = 6, Hu{g}e = 6, {S}a{g}e = 06, {Ch}ea{t}{s} = 610, +{Sh}e{d} = 61, {Sh}ea{th} = 61, {Sh}o{t} = 61, {G}i{n} = 62, +{Sh}i{n} = 62, {J}ea{n} = 62, {Ch}i{n} = 62, {G}e{m} = 63, {J}a{m} = 63, +{Sh}a{m}e = 63, {Ch}i{m}e = 63, U{sh}e{r} = 64, {J}u{r}y = 64, +{Ch}ai{r} = 64, Wa{g}e{r} = 64, {Sh}a{l}l = 65, {J}ai{l} = 65, +{Ch}i{l}l = 65, {G}e{ntl}e = 6215, {J}ewi{sh} = 66. + +7 IS REPRESENTED BY "G^hard" "K," "C^hard" "Q," AND "NG." WE FIND THE +LETTER EQUIVALENTS OF 7 IN THE INITIAL CONSONANTS OF THE PHRASE: +(Seven), {G}reat {K}ings {C}ame {Q}uarrelli{ng}. We thus use the +termination "ng" to express 7. Ho{g} = 7, {K}ey = 7, {C}ue = 7, +You{ng} = 7, Yo{k}e = 7, Wi{g} = 7. As no vowels have any figure +value, they cut no figure in translating into numbers. {D}e{ck} = 17, +{D}e{s}{k} = 107, {K}i{d} = 71. {S}{k}a{t}e = 071, A{s}{k} = 07, +A{s}{k}i{ng} = 077, {S}{k}e{tch} = 076, {S}{q}ui{r}e = 074, {C}a{s}e{s} += 700, {G}a{t}e = 71, E{g}a{d} = 71, {K}i{t}e = 71, {Q}uo{t}e = 71. This +first "{g}" is hard (7) and the second "{g}" is soft (6) in +{G}an{g}es. The "{g}" in Governor is hard and in General is soft in +{G}overnor-{G}eneral. The first "{c}" is hard (7) and the second "{c}" +is soft (0) in a{c}{c}i{d}e{n}{t}, = 70121, Ha{g}g{l}e = 75, A{c}{m}e = 73, +{C}a{n}no{n} = 722, {G}ui{t}a{r} = 714, {S}{q}uea{k} = 077. + +WE REPRESENT 8 BY "F" AND "V," BECAUSE YOU CAN IMAGINE A WRITTEN "F" TO +BE AN ELONGATED 8, AND "V" IS A COGNATE OF "F," hence equivalent to the +same number; as, Wi{f}e = 8, Wo{v}e = 8. The vowels, although used in +the words, have no figure values, neither do "w," "y," or "h," when not +a part of "sh" or "ch." {S}a{f}e = 08, {S}a{v}e = 08, I{v}y = 8, +Hi{v}e = 8, {F}oe = 8, {D}i{v}e = 18, E{d}i{f}y = 18, {T}i{f}f = 18, +{Th}ie{f} = 18, {Th}ie{v}e = 18, {T}ou{gh} = 18, E{n}ou{gh} = 28, +{N}a{v}y = 28, K{n}a{v}e = 28, {N}e{f}a{r}iou{s} = 2840, {M}u{f}f = 38, +{M}o{v}e = 38, {R}u{f}f = 48, {R}oo{f} = 48, {R}ou{gh} = 48, +{R}e{v}iew = 48, A{l}i{v}e = 58, A{l}oo{f} = 58, {L}ea{v}e = 58, +{L}ea{f} = 58, A{lph}a = 58, {Sh}ea{f} = 68, {Ch}a{f}f = 68, +{J}o{v}e = 68, {Sh}a{v}e = 68, {Sh}o{v}e = 68, {C}a{v}e = 78, +{C}al{f} = 78, {G}a{v}e = 78, {C}ou{gh} = 78, {Q}ua{f}f = 78, +{Q}ui{v}e{r} = 784, {F}i{v}e = 88, {F}i{f}e = 88, {F}eo{f}f = 88, +{F}i{fth} = 881, {V}i{v}i{d} = 881, {F}a{c}e{s} = 800. + +9 IS REPRESENTED BY "B" AND "P." (Nine) {B}eautiful {P}eacocks would +indicate the figure value of 9, in the initial consonants of +"{b}eautiful {p}eacocks." {B}ee = 9, and the two vowels "ee" have no +figure value. {B}ow = 9, {P}ie = 9, {P}ew = 9, {P}ay = 9, A{p}e = 9, +U{p} = 9, {B}y = 9, {B}a{s}e = 90, {B}ia{s} = 90, {P}o{s}e = 90, +{P}au{s}e = 90, {B}oa{t} = 91, {B}o{th} = 91, {B}ea{d} = 91, +{B}ea{n} = 92, {B}o{n}e = 92, {P}o{t} = 91, {P}a{th} = 91, {P}a{d} = 91, +{P}i{n}e = 92, {B}ea{m} = 93, {B}a{r} = 94, {B}a{l}e = 95, +{B}a{dg}e = 96, {B}u{sh} = 96, {B}u{f}f = 98, {B}a{b}y = 99, +{P}oe{m} = 93, {P}ai{r} = 94, {P}i{l}e = 95, {P}u{sh} = 96, +{P}a{g}e = 96, {P}u{f}f = 98, {P}i{p}e = 99, {P}o{p}e = 99, +{P}ac{k} = 97. + + 1. Why is 5 represented by "L"? + 2. By what is 6 represented? + 3. Through the initial consonants of what sentence, not considering + the six in brackets? + 4. Where do we find the letter equivalents of 7, not regarding the + seven in brackets? + 5. What termination do we also use to express 7? + 6. If the termination "ng" represent 7, what is the figure value of + Singing? + 7. Give the figure value of Hong-kong. + 8. By what two consonants do we represent 8? + 9. Why? + 10. Give the figure value of the vowels in these illustrations, if + you find they have any value. + +The representatives of the figures from 0 up to 9 are given in the +initial consonants of the ten subsequent phrases following the +figures:-- + + "{S}i{d}{n}ey {M}e{r}{l}i{sh} {g}a{v}e a {b}ow"[C] + = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. + + Nought (0) {S}o {Z}ealous {C}eases. + One (1) {T}ankard {th}is {D}ay. + Two (2) {N}ostrils. (or 2 {N}ations. Ex. 35, 10; 37, 22.) + Three (3) {M}eals. (or 3 {M}ighty {M}en. 2 Sam. 23.) + Four (4) {R}oads. (or 4 {R}ings. Ex. 25, 26; 38, 5.) + Five (5) {L}oaves. (Matt. 14; Mark 6; Luke 9.) + Six (6) {Sh}y {J}ewesses {Ch}ose {G}eorge. + Seven (7) {G}reat {K}ings {C}ame {Q}uarrelli{ng}. + Eight (8) {F}old {V}alue. (or 8 '{V}arsity {F}ellows.) + Nine (9) {P}in {B}owling. + +[C] Gouraud said: "{S}a{t}a{n} {m}ay {r}e{l}i{sh} {c}o{f}fee {p}ie." + +This explanation is a help to remember the _letter-values of the +figures_. Another way to fix these values in mind for permanent use is +to turn _words into figures_, as in going through an ordinary +spelling-book. This practice quickly enables you to _turn figures into +words_, and to translate them back into figures. Facility will be +attained long before the lessons are completed. But this lesson, +_thoroughly_ studied, will secure the needful proficiency. + + 1. By what two consonants is the figure value of 9 represented? + 2. What are represented in the initial consonants of the ten + Phrases here given, not including, of course, the words before + the figures in brackets? + 3. Are these sentences of any help in remembering the letter values + of the figures? + 4. What other way is there to fix these values in mind? + 5. What does this practice enable you to do? + + +RULES. + +_Not to be glanced at or skipped, but to be carefully studied._ + +1.--Two consonants of the _same kind_ with no vowel between, provided + they have the _same_ sound, are treated as one consonant, as + "ll" = 5, "nn" = 2, "rr" = 4, "dd" = 1, &c. The first two + consonants have different values in the word "accident" = 70121. + +2.--All _silent_ consonants are _disregarded_, as "b" in + "Lam_b_" = 53, "Com_b_" = 73, or in "Tom_b_" = 13. "_Ph_" and "_h_" + in "_Ph_t_h_isic" = 107; "_gh_" in Bou_gh_t = 91; "_k_" in + _K_now = 2; "_gh_" in Nei_gh_bours = 2940; "l" in Cou_l_d = 71, or + in Psa_l_m = 03. + +3.--The _equivalents_ of the figure-consonants have the _same value_ + as those consonants themselves, as "gh" in "{T}ou{gh}" = 18, "gh" + in E{n}ou{gh} = 28; "gh" in {R}ou{gh} = 48. "{Ph}{r}a{s}e" = 840, + "{N}y{mph}" = 238, "{L}o{ck}" = 57. "N" sometimes sounds like + ng, and so represents 7, as in "Bank" (977) which _sounds_ like + "bang" (not "ban") with a "k" after it; ng are not always taken + together as one sound and translated into 7, but when they sound + separately are treated separately, as in engage = 276[D]. X = gs + or ks = 70, as in example = 70395; in oxygen = 7062. Sometimes + X = Z, as in Xerxes = 04700, and then it = 0. Ci and ti, and + sometimes si and sci = sh, as gracious = 7460; Nation = 262; + Conscience = 72620. Dge = j, as in Ju{dge} = 66. Tch = ch = 6, as + in ditch = 16 (it rhymes with rich = 46). Ch sometimes = k, as in + {Ch}ristmas = 74030. S and z sometimes = zh, which is the cognate + equivalent of sh = 6, as in pleasure = 9564, and in + Crozier = 7464. Acquiesce = 70, excrescence = 7074020. + +[D] Pupils who have a poor ear for sounds sometimes fail to note when +"n" sounds like "ng" and so means 7 instead of 2. Let them study the +words "ringer" (474), "linger" (5774), and "ginger" (6264). The first +syllable of "linger" rhymes with the first of "ringer" and not with the +first of "ginger;" it rhymes with "ring" and not with "gin;" and if the +first syllable of "ringer" is 47, the first of "linger" must be 57; but +the second syllable of "linger" is "ger," while the second syllable of +"ringer" is only "er." So "linger" is pronounced as if spelled +"ling-ger," the "n" sounds like "ng." "Ringer" is pronounced +"ring-er," and "ginger" as if spelled "gin-ger." + + 1. When will facility be attained? + 2. Are these rules to be carefully studied? + 3. Repeat the first rule. + 4. What value is given to silent consonants? + 5. What have the same value as the consonants themselves? + 6. What does the consonant "N" sometimes sound like? + 7. What value is assigned to it in such cases? + 8. What is the consonant X equal to? + +4.--No notice is taken of any _vowel_ or of w (war = 4) or y + (yoke = 7), or of h (the = 1) except as part of ch or sh. Words + like Weigh, Whey, &c., having no figure values, are never counted. + If one word ends with, and the next word begins with, the _same_ + consonant, they are both reckoned, as That Toad = 1111. + + +HOW TO DEAL WITH DECIMAL FRACTIONS. + +The pupil may skip the next paragraph if not wishing to deal with +decimals. + +[As a rule, it is better not to use words _beginning_ with S, except to +translate _decimals_ and _fractions_, and Date-words where a _doubt_ +might otherwise arise (unless in a phrase like "To see Jiji," "delay a +spy," &c.); and in case of the _decimals_, S, as the _initial_ letter, +means (not 0, but) the decimal point. (1) If there is an integer +followed by a decimal, two separate words are used; the decimal-word +begins with S, thus: 945.51 = barley sold; 71.3412 = "good Samaritan." +(2) If it is a decimal by itself, the S indicates the decimal point +only; .01 = society; .02 = Susan; .94 = sparrow. (3) If it is a vulgar +fraction, the words translating numerator and denominator begin with S, +and the S's are not counted, the numerator-word coming first, and the +denominator-word last; thus 5/12 = sell Satan.] + +As to Date-words, just _before_ the Christian Era you may use an initial +S [or the vowel A, or any other vowel], as, Stir would mean 14 B.C. +[Before Christ]; and, of course, Tower would mean 14 A.D. [for _Anno +Domini_--in the year of our Lord]; Soar = 4 B.C., and Rue = 4 A.D. In a +Date-word like Trial, to express 145 B.C., no doubt could arise; if the +Pupil knows the contemporary history, he could not imagine it could be +290 later, or 145 A.D. If he fears he might not remember that it was +B.C. he could remove all doubt by using the word Stroll, or any other +word which translates 145 and begins with S. + + 1. Do we ever take any notice of a vowel? + 2. Are there any words which do not have a figure value, and if so, + what are they? + 3. When do we use the letter "S" in dealing with decimals? + 4. When does "S" indicate the decimal point? + 5. When are two separate words used? + 6. In such cases, with what does the decimal word begin? + 7. In case of a vulgar fraction, what words begin with "S"? + 8. Are the S's then counted? + 9. Which word comes first? +10. How may we deal with date-words which express the time of + events before the Christian Era? +11. After? + +For convenience of reference I now give the figure Alphabet tabulated. + + --------+----+---+---+---+---+--------+--------+---+---- + 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 + --------+----+---+---+---+---+--------+--------+---+---- + S | t | n | m | r | l | sh | g^hard | f | b + Z | th | | | | | j | k | v | p + C^soft | d | | | | | ch | c^hard | | + | | | | | | g^soft | q | | + | | | | | | | ng | | + --------+----+---+---+---+---+--------+--------+---+---- + +If the pupil has mastered the Figure Alphabet he will proceed with the +greatest satisfaction and profit. If he has not mastered it, let him +carefully review the foregoing pages of this chapter, and then he can +advance with the assurance of meeting no difficulties. + + 1. Write the Figure Alphabet from memory. + 2. If the pupil has not thoroughly mastered this alphabet, what is + required of him? + 3. If the pupil must review the foregoing six pages, let him find + words himself which spell the figures. + 4. Is not such a course much better than merely to read over the + examples and illustrations which I give? + 5. Is it easy to find words with which to translate dates and + numbers? + + +HOW TO FIND WORDS WITH WHICH TO TRANSLATE DATES AND NUMBERS. + +It is a simple and easy process; knowing exactly what consonants are +used to represent each of the numbers, you simply write at the side of +the numbers to be turned into words the consonants which stand for them; +and using any vowels you please, you find out by experimenting what +words can translate the figures. Suppose you wish to find out what words +will translate the date of the settlement of Jamestown, Va., 1607. You +place the figures under each other as below, and then you place at the +right hand of each figure the consonants which translate it. + + 1 = t, th, d. + 6 = sh, j, ch, g soft (as in gem), + 0 = s, z, c soft (as in cease). + 7 = g hard, k, c hard, q, and ng. + +By experimenting you soon find the following phrases will represent +1607; as, "A {D}u{tch} {S}o{ng}," "{D}a{sh} a {S}a{ck}," "{T}o wa{sh} a +{S}o{ck}," "{Th}e {Ch}oo{s}i{ng}," "{Th}e {Ch}a{s}i{ng}," "{T}ou{ch}e{s} +a {K}ey," &c. + +Try the date of the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, +1787. Writing down the numbers as before, you place t, th, d, opposite +1; g hard, k, c hard, q, ng, opposite 7; f and v, opposite 8; g hard, k, +c hard, q, and ng, opposite 7; and then you soon find translating words, +as follows: "{T}o {g}i{v}e a {K}ey," "{Th}e {g}i{v}i{ng}," "{Th}e +{q}ua{f}fi{ng}," "{Th}e {C}ou{gh}i{ng}," &c. + +In all cases you must carefully comply with the rules and explanations +heretofore given. A little practice will enable you to dispense with +writing down the figures and the consonants which represent them; but at +first pains must be taken in the above way to secure accuracy. + + 1. What would be your method of procedure? + 2. What must be done in all cases? + 3. What will a little practice enable you to do? + 4. What must be done to secure accuracy at first? + 5. Deal with an original date in the way indicated here. + 6. In dealing with the date of the foundation of Yale College, + would the phrase "taxes due" express 1701? + 7. If not, why? + 8. Can you translate into a word or phrase the date of your own + birth? + 9. Translate into words or phrases the birth and death dates of + some of the historic characters which you admire most. + 10. Keep a record of these words or phrases for future examination. + +Try 1636, the date of the founding of Harvard College: You obtain +"{D}a{sh} a {m}i{dg}e," "{Th}e {ch}u{m} a{g}e," "{T}ea{ch} {m}u{ch}," +"{T}o {sh}ow {m}y {j}oy," &c. + +The founding of Yale College in 1701 gives: "{T}oo{k} a {s}ea{t}," +"{Th}e {c}o{s}{t}," "{Th}e {q}ue{s}{t}," "{Th}e {c}a{s}{t}," "A {t}a{x} +{d}ue," or "{T}oo{k} a {c}i{t}y," &c. + +Sometimes the first consonants only of words are used. Comenius, +Educational Reformer (things before words, pictured illustrations, &c.) +and Moravian Bishop, was born 1592: or (1) {Th}ings (5) We{l}l (9) +{P}ictured (2) {N}ow. He died 1671; or A (1) {T}eaching (6) {Ch}urchman +(7) {G}ave (1) Ou{t}. + + +SYNTHETIC TRANSLATION OF FIGURES. + +_When the word or phrase used to translate figures sustains no relation +of In., Ex., or Con., to the event itself, that word or phrase is +synthetic and is dealt with hereafter._ + +Nearly all the translating words given in this section so far are +synthetic. "The coughing," sustains no relation of In., Ex., or Con., to +the adoption of the Constitution of the U. S., and is therefore +relegated to the next chapter for the method of cementing it to that +event if we were obliged to use that phrase. + +Synthesis will be sometimes hereafter resorted to to connect in our +minds an event to its date. When this will be necessary, the sequel will +show. + + +ANALYTIC DATE AND NUMBER WORDS. + +_When the word or phrase which translates the date or number sustains +the relation of In., Ex., or Con., to the event or fact itself, that +word or phrase is analytic, and is memorised by merely assimilating that +relation._ + +Different ways of expressing figures by words, phrases, or sentences +that are self-connected to the fact or event will now be given. + +1. SOMETIMES ALL THE SOUNDED CONSONANTS OF A WORD OR PHRASE ARE USED. + +Room-mates in college are called "chums." Harvard College--the oldest +Collegiate Institution in America--really introduced "the chum age" in +America. The formula for the date of its foundation in 1636 may be +thus expressed--Harvard College founded; {th}e {ch}u{m} a{g}e [1636]. + +The annual production of iron in America is said to be _six million four +hundred and twenty-seven thousand, one hundred and forty-eight_ tons. +These figures may be analytically expressed thus: "Hu{g}e i{r}o{n} we +{g}e{t} {r}ou{gh}" [6,427,148 tons]. + +The great wall of China is 1,250 miles long. This may be expressed thus: +"{Th}ey {n}ow a high Wa{l}l see" [1250]. + +A characteristic of Herbert Spencer is the accuracy of his definitions. +His birth, in 1820, may be indicated by this significant phrase: "He +{D}e{f}i{n}e{s}" [1820]. + +2. SOMETIMES ONLY THE INITIAL CONSONANTS OF THE WORDS OR PHRASES OR +SENTENCES ARE USED. + +Caius Julius Caesar was born 100 B.C., and he died 44 B.C. His birth may +be expressed by the phrase, (1) "{Th}e (0) {S}tripling (0) {C}aesar;" and +his death by a phrase which declares that his death was the remote +result of his crossing the Rubicon, thus: (4) "{R}ubicon's (4) +{R}evenge." + +Marcus Tullius Cicero was born 106 B.C., and he died 43 B.C. His birth: +(1) "{T}ullius (0) {C}icero's (6) {Ch}ildhood." His death: (4) "{R}emove +(3) {M}arcus." [In allusion to the order for his death.] + +The height of Egypt's greatest pyramid is 479 feet, or (4) "Wo{r}ld's +(7) {G}reatest (9) {P}yramid." + +The city of Melbourne was named after Lord Melbourne in 1837, or (3) +"{M}elbourne (7) {Ch}ristened." + +It will be convenient to consider all compound names of cities or places +as if they were single words, using only the initial consonant of the +first of the names, as (2) {N}ew-York, or (2) {N}ew-Amsterdam, or (2) +U{n}ited-States, etc. + +New York City [at first known as New Amsterdam] was settled by the Dutch +in 1626, or New York founded: (1) "{D}utchmen (6) {Ch}ose (2) +{N}ew-Amsterdam (6) {J}oyfully." + +Virginia was settled at Jamestown in 1607. This date may be +analytically expressed thus: (1) "{Th}en (6) {J}amestown (0) Wa{s} (7) +{C}olonized." + +The exact population of the United States, according to the census of +1880, may be expressed through the initial consonants of the following +sentence: "A (5) {L}ate (0) {C}ensus, (1) 'Eigh{t}y's' (8) {F}urnishes +(9) {P}recise (2) U{n}ited-States (0) {S}overeign (9) {P}opulation," or +50,189,209. + +The _exact_ population of the United States declared in June, 1890, +commonly called the _census of "ninety,"_ was stated as _sixty-two +millions six hundred and twenty-two thousand two hundred and fifty_, or +"A (6) {G}eneral (2) E{n}umeration (6) whi{ch} (2) U{n}doubtedly (2) +I{n}dicates (2) '{N}inety's' (5) {L}arge (0) {C}ensus." 62,622,250, or +for the last three figures we could say: (2) U{n}ited States' (5) +{L}arge (0) {C}ensus. + +Before the close of the year 1890 an official census of the Whites and +Indians on the Indian Reservations added 243,875 to the above number, +making the total population of the United States in 1890, 62,866,125. A +(6) {G}eneral (2) E{n}umeration (8) O{f}ficially (6) S{h}ows (6) {J}ust +(1) {Th}e (2) {N}umber (5) {L}iving. Now (1895) it is computed to be +67,000,000 [to express the round numbers of millions, we could say, (6) +{J}ust (7) {G}overnment or (6) {Ch}arming (7) {C}ountry]. + +The birth of Herbert Spencer, in 1820, may be expressed thus: (1) +A{d}vent (8) o{f} (2) I{n}fant (0) {S}pencer, or (1) {Th}e (8) {F}uture +(2) "U{n}knowable" (0) {S}pencer, (2) I{n}fant (0) {S}pencer. Several +different ways of expressing the _same date_ will be given in a few +cases. + +It is often convenient for a teacher, and others, to recall the number +of a page of a book in which a citation is found. In Prof. William +James's Psychology Abridged for Schools and Colleges, the chapter on +Habit begins on p. 134, or "(1) {Th}e (3) {M}ould (4) {R}ules;" the +chapter on Will begins on p. 415: "A (4) {R}esolve (1) {D}enotes +(5) Wi{l}l;" the chapter on Attention begins on p. 217, or "(2) {N}otice +(1) A{t}tention's (7) {Q}ualities;" the chapter on Association begins on +p. 253, or (2) "{N}ow (5) He{l}p (3) {M}emory;" and that on Memory on +p. 287, or "(2) I{n}tellect (8) {F}orbids (7) {C}ramming." Prof. +Loisette's New York Office is in Fifth Avenue at No. 237, or "A (2) +{N}ew (3) {M}emory (7) {G}iven," or "A (2) {N}ew (3) {M}emory (7) +A{c}quired." His London Office was formerly at 37 [a {m}emory {g}ained] +New Oxford Street. It is now at _200 Regent Street, London_ [(2) {N}ow +(0) {S}ecure (0) A{s}similation]. + +3. SOMETIMES THE FIRST TWO CONSONANTS OF A WORD ARE USED. + +Sheridan's famous ride occurred in 1864. In dates of the last and +present century it is usual to indicate the last two figures of the +date. 64, therefore, is all we need express. Formula: Sheridan's ride in +1864--(64) {Ch}ee{r}s; or, (64) {Sh}e{r}idan. The Pennsylvania Whisky +Rebellion took place in 1794; or, (94) {B}{r}ewery. + +4. SOMETIMES THE FIRST AND LAST CONSONANTS OF A WORD ARE USED, AND +SOMETIMES TWO CONSONANTS IN THE MIDDLE OF A WORD. + +These devices are rarely resorted to, but if ever used, they must be +thoroughly assimilated. Battle of Waterloo was fought in 1815; 15 may be +found in the _t_ and _l_ of (15) Wa{t}er{l}oo. Herbert Spencer was born, +as we have already seen, in 1820. The 20 may be found in the _n_ and _c_ +of Spe{n}{c}er. + +5. Never, on any account, use the same word to express two different +dates; as, its first two consonants for one date and its two middle, or +its first and last consonants, to express another date. + +6. _Never fail to carefully analyse the relations between the fact or +event and its date or number word._ + +SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTIONS HEREAFTER NAMED, ALL DATES AND NUMBERS SHOULD +BE EXACTLY EXPRESSED IN THE DATE OR NUMBER WORDS. + +Alexander the Great was born 356 B.C. and died in a drunken debauch +323 B.C. His birth: (3) {M}acedonia's (5) A{l}exander a (6) {Ch}ild. His +death: A (3) {M}acedonian's (2) I{n}ebriation (3) {M}ortal. Several +mnemonists of the old school have for the past forty years used the +phrase "Rise, Sire," to express the date of the creation of the world, +which according to the accepted biblical chronology took place 4004 B.C. +But that phrase, proper enough in the mouths of the sons of Noah, when +they found their father lying on the ground in a fit of intoxication, +could have no pertinence when applied to the Creator, to the creation +in general, or to the creation of this world in particular. A +self-connected phrase would, however, express this date as follows: +"Creation of the World: (4) Ea{r}th (0) {S}tarted (0) {S}wiftly (4) +{R}otating." + +_First Exception._--From A.D. 1000 to A.D. 1700 the last three figures +of the date should be expressed in the date words. {M}a{r}{s} expresses +340 and could be used to indicate the invention of cannon in (1) 340 by +one who knew that Mars was the name of the god of war in classic +mythology. The formula would be: "Invention of cannon: (1) 340 +{M}a{r}{s}." But this term would have no mnemonic significance to one who +knows the word Mars as meaning only one of the planets. Hence the +danger--ever to be avoided--of using classical allusions in teaching the +average student. A (3) {m}artial (4) O{r}gan (0) {S}ways, or {m}urderous +a{r}tillery {s}tarted. + +_Second Exception._--From A.D. 1700 to the present moment, the last two +figures must be expressed in the date words. Many examples will +hereafter illustrate this exception. In very rare cases, the expression +of the last figure in the date word will suffice. We know that Ralph +Waldo Emerson and Oliver Wendell Holmes [author of the Autocrat of the +Breakfast Table] were born towards the beginning of this century, the +former in 1803 and the latter in 1809. The following formulas would give +the date of their birth: Ralph Waldo (180)3 E{m}erson; Oliver Wendell +Holmes (180)9 "{B}reakfast." + +_Third Exception._--In cases where there is no practical utility in +comparing one very large number with another, as in the case of the +distances of the planets from the sun, mere round numbers may suffice, +yet astronomers must know such numbers with exactness. But in regard to +all mundane affairs, the pupil must throw off the character of scholar +and assume the license of children, if he attempts to express large +numbers, as of populations, &c., by "guessing," or, what is the same +thing, by only giving round numbers. The Brooklyn Suspension Bridge is +5989 feet long, and the Forth Bridge, which crosses the Firth of Forth +in Scotland, is 8296 feet long. Now, instead of saying that the former +is _about_ 5000 feet long, why not say 5989 feet long? [(5) {L}ong (9) +{B}ridge (8) O{f} (9) {B}rooklyn.] And instead of saying that the latter +is _about or somewhere in the neighbourhood_ of 8000 feet long, why not +be exact and say 8296 feet long? [(8) {F}orth's (2) {N}ew (9) {B}ridge +(6) {Sh}own. It was completed in 1890.] + +No one who has not had experience in dealing with thousands of poor +memories, as I have had, can realise the fact that in most cases of poor +memories _the facts themselves are often possessed_, but are mostly +_unrecallable_ when wanted. I have tried to teach pupils how to find +analytic date or number words _without any previous training in In., +Ex., and Con._, and 99 of all such attempts have always been failures. +The 100th case, which succeeded, only confirmed the rule. On the other +hand, I have always found that these failures become successes after a +thorough practical training in In., Ex., and Con., such as I have +already given. In fact, I never had a pupil who became proficient in the +use of In., Ex., and Con., who did not arrive at the use of analytic +number words without any specific directions from me. But I think, on +the whole, that it is the better way to _combine_ direct and specific +training in analytic number words, with a previous exhaustive general +drill in In., Ex., and Con. + +The rules hereafter given must be carefully studied and every example +painstakingly examined. After studying my formulas let the pupil +endeavour in _each case_ to find a better one himself. If the pupil acts +on my advice, he will know how to be always _sure_ to think of the +needful related or including facts for finding analytic date words, +phrases, or sentences. + +The different processes for dealing with dates or numbers may be +classified as follows:-- + +(1) _Cases where the name of the person, fact, or event gives its date_; +as, Birth of the colored orator and politician Frederick {D}ou{g}lass +(18)17. This kind of a case is of rare occurrence, and it would be like +the charlatanry which has disgraced many former memory systems to allow +the pupil to suppose that it frequently happens. A glance at the event, +word, or description will quickly tell him if it represents the +necessary figures, and if it do not, he must resort to an analytic date +word, or phrase, or sentence, whichever he finds most suitable for him. +No one figure alphabet contains the advantages of all others. Each has +special advantages in special cases. Whatever figure alphabet, however, +is used, the main thing about it is to master it thoroughly. + +(2) _Cases where a significant or analytic word or phrase expresses the +date or number._ "I{l}l-u{s}a{g}e" expresses the date of the death of +Columbus in 1506, as he died in great neglect. The impetuous pupil says: +"How can I be sure that this phrase applies to Columbus? Would it not +apply to any one who had been ill-used?" Certainly not. It applies only +to an ill-used man whose date (birth or death, &c.) was in 1506. If he +knows of some other man who was greatly ill-used and who died in 1506, +then he must use another analytic phrase for that man. See next +paragraph. + +Six distinguished persons were born in 1809, yet the date of the birth +of each is easily fixed: Darwin, whose principal work was called "Origin +of Species;" Gladstone, noted for his vigorous eloquence; Lincoln, who +was conspicuous as a binder together of separated States; Tennyson, who +was chosen as Poet-Laureate, and who was born at Somersby, England; +Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, who early displayed a musical genius, and +whose first oratorio was called "St. Paul;" Elizabeth Barrett Browning +[_nee_ Elizabeth Barrett], whose poems are distinguished for their +subjectivity. The analytic formulas for these different persons born in +the same year, 1809, may each differ from the others, thus: + + Birth of Charles Darwin {S}{p}ecies (18)09 + + ---- William Ewart Gladstone {S}{p}ellbinder (18)09 + + ---- Abraham Lincoln {S}{p}licer (18)09 + + ---- Alfred Tennyson, {P}oet (180)9 or (0) {S}elected (9) {P}oet + or {S}omers{b}y (09) + + ---- Felix Mendelssohn-{B}artholdy (180)9 or {P}recocious (180)9, + or (0) {S}t. (9) {P}aul + + ---- Elizabeth {B}arret Browning (180)9, or {S}u{b}jective (18)09 + + 1. Do all pupils succeed in finding analytic date or number words + without any previous training in In., Ex., or Con.? + 2. What proportion succeeded? + 3. Does this not confirm the rule? + 4. Do these failures ever become successes? + 5. How? + 6. What must be carefully studied hereafter? + 7. After studying my formulas, what should the pupil do? + 8. What will be the result, if the pupil acts on my advice? + 9. In what ways may the different processes for dealing with dates + and numbers be classified? + +Benjamin Franklin was born in 1706, and died in 1790. (0) "{S}agacious +(6) {ch}ild" would analytically fix his birth, as he was known as a +precocious boy: or the single word (06) {S}a{g}e. As he was a great +worker all his life, (90) "{B}u{s}y," or "(9) {B}enjamin (0) {C}eased" +would significantly express his death-date. + +(3) _Cases where the initial consonants of a short sentence analytically +express the date._ + +The analytic number words, phrases, and sentences which one retains most +easily are those which he has made himself. Formulas prepared by others +are perfectly retained, however, if they are thoroughly _assimilated_. + +_The analytic word or phrase is what one most usually finds and uses._ +Sentences will sometimes be useful because they may contain the name of +the event, and they sometimes offer a wider range for selection of the +needed consonants; but care must be taken to avoid ambiguity. To +indicate the birth of Lincoln, we might use this formula: (1) {D}awn (8) +o{f} (0) A{s}sassinated (9) {P}resident, but as Garfield was also +assassinated, the formula in its _meaning_ would equally apply to the +latter. If, however, we know that Garfield was born in 1831, the +ambiguity would be removed. (1) {D}awn (8) o{f} (0) A{s}sassinated (9) +A{b}raham could apply only to Lincoln. (1) {D}awn (8) o{f} (0) +{S}lavery's (9) {P}resident would be applicable to the career of +Buchanan, Pierce and Fillmore, but it would express the birth-date only +of Lincoln, while it would be wholly inapplicable to his career. (1) +{D}awn (8) o{f} (0) {S}lavery's (9) {P}unisher would exclusively apply +to Lincoln's life and birth-date. + + 1. Can you think of any other analytic words to express the date of + the birth of Abraham Lincoln? + 2. Since "h" has no figure value, could we not use "Shaper"? + 3. If not, why? + 4. What analytic number, word, phrase, or sentence, does the pupil + retain best? + 5. Are formulas made by others ever perfectly retained? + 6. In what cases? + +(2) "{N}oah a (34) {M}e{r}e (8) Wai{f}," (2) "{N}oah (3) {M}ay (48) +{R}o{v}e," or (2) "{N}oah (3) {M}ay (48) A{r}ri{v}e," are analytic +sentences where _all the sounded consonants_ are used. But a greater +_variety_ of sentences might be found, or _one_ sentence be more readily +found in the first instance if only the _initial_ consonants are used: +as, (2) {N}oah's (3) {M}enagerie (4) A{r}k (8) {F}ull, or (2) {N}oah (3) +{M}ade (4) A{r}arat (8) {F}amous, or (2) {N}oah's (3) {M}arvellous (4) +{R}ainy (8) {F}lood, or (2) {N}oah's (3) {M}ighty (4) A{r}k (8) +{F}loated, or (2) {N}oah (3) {M}ounted (4) A{r}arat (8) {F}irmly. Other +specific analytic phrases for this event may easily be found by the +student. + +The superiority of analytic phrases where _all_ the sounded consonants +are used, over the analytic sentences, where only the initial consonants +are employed, may be seen in the case of the number of men who enlisted +in behalf of the Federal Government in the late war. The number was _two +millions, three hundred and twenty thousand, eight hundred and +fifty-four_. By initial consonants we have, (2) A{n}y (3) {M}an (2) +{n}ow (0) i{s} (8) a {f}ull (5) {l}oyal (4) He{r}o. By all the sounded +consonants we have--"I{n}hu{m}a{n} Ci{v}i{l} Wa{r};" the latter shorter, +more significant, and more easily remembered. And, on the principle that +a condensed, brief statement, if clear and definite, makes a more vivid +impression than a longer one, we shall find that a short analytic phrase +is better for the memory than an analytic sentence, and an analytic +single word than a phrase. But a short analytic phrase, or a short +analytic sentence, is usually necessary, owing to our ignorance of the +subject matter, the limitations which belong to all figure alphabets, +and our neglect to act strictly on the lines of In., Ex., and Con. + + 1. Is the analytic word or phrase self-connected to the event? + 2. Why will sentences sometimes be useful? + 3. What must be avoided? + 4. Can a greater variety of sentences be found if only the initial + consonants are used? + 5. What does the phrase "Inhuman Civil War" represent? + 6. What does it show the superiority of? + 7. What are the characteristics which recommend it? + 8. Is a short analytic phrase better for the memory than an + analytic sentence? + 9. On what principle? + +(4) _Cases where there is no direct relation between the person, fact, +or event, and the date, or number word or words._ In such cases, +Synthesis, which is taught hereafter, develops an _indirect_ relation. +Synthesis is used in three cases: (1) Where there is no relation +_existing_ between the fact or event and its date word; (2) Where _we +are ignorant_ of all the facts which would give us significant or +analytic date-words; and (3) where we know the needful pertinent facts +with which analytic words could be formed, but we cannot _recall_ them +for use. In these three cases Synthesis must be used. I will now give +and illustrate the rules for the prompt finding of _analytic date or +number words_. + +The _preparation_ for thus remembering numbers without effort is the +only exertion required. When the method is mastered, the _application_ +of it is made with the greatest ease and pleasure. + +There are four indispensable requisites to finding analytic date and +number words promptly. + +(1) SUCH A MASTERY OF THE FIGURE ALPHABET THAT THE CONSONANT EQUIVALENTS +OF THE CIPHER AND NINE DIGITS ARE AT INSTANT COMMAND, AND NEVER HAVE TO +BE LOOKED UP WHEN YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH FIGURES. + +Pumps were invented in 1425. A student who thinks 2 is to be translated +by "m" instead of "n," translates the dates by these phrases, _viz._, +"Drum a whale," or "Trim oil," or "To ram a wall." As these phrases +sustain the relation neither of In., Ex., or Con. to the fact, they are +hard to be remembered; and if remembered, they mislead. The student who +has mastered the Fig. Alphabet remembers that "n" stands for 2, and if +he knows the object of pumps, he at once finds the analytic phrase, +"Drain a well." The formula would be: "The pump invented--{D}{r}ai{n} a +we{l}l (1425)," or (1) Wa{t}er (4) {r}aised (2) i{n} a (5) ho{l}low. How +could he forget the date? + +Tea was first used in Europe in 1601. The unobserving student imagines +that 6 is translated by g^hard, k, c^hard, q, or ng, and so he +translates 1601 into "Ou{tc}a{st}," (1701); a mistake of 100 years, and, +besides, "Outcast" is wholly unconnected with the introduction of tea +into Europe. The genuine student knows that 6 is represented by sh, j, +ch, or g^soft, and so he at once finds the analytic formula: "Tea first +introduced into Europe--{T}ea {ch}e{s}{t} (1601)." The figure phrase +bears the relation of In. and Con. to the event, and cannot be forgotten. +Besides many people believe that tea helps digestion, and such persons +would find an analytic date-word thus: "Tea first used in +Europe--{D}i{g}e{s}{t} (1601)." + + 1. What is sometimes necessary? + 2. In how many cases is Synthesis used? + 3. What are they? + 4. How many indispensable requisites are there to finding analytic + date and number words promptly? + 5. Is draining a well the sole object of a pump? + 6. Was such its purpose originally? + 7. Explain the two phrases used to fix the date of the introduction + of tea into Europe. + 8. Can a figure phrase that bears the relation of In., Ex., or Con. + to the event be forgotten? + +"C^soft" is often mistaken for "c^hard" by careless learners. Fulton's +steamboat "Clermont" was launched in 1807. Such a pupil translates that +date by the phrase, "{D}e{f}ie{s} i{c}e" (1800). Here "c" is soft and +represents a cipher and not 7. "{D}e{f}y a {s}{c}ow" gives the exact date. +Here the "c" is hard and represents 7, and as the steamboat could easily +outrun the "scow," the phrase is easily remembered. + +An impatient pupil who never learns anything thoroughly often disregards +the rule about _silent_ consonants. Braddock and most of his men were +killed by the Indians in 1755. This date this pupil translates by the +phrase, "Dock knell all" (17255). He overlooks the fact that 17 was +expressed by "Dock," and no one out of a mad-house can tell how he came +to add "knell all," unless he had forgotten that he had provided for the +7 of 17, and imagined that "k" in knell is sounded. But how account for +"n" to introduce 2? A genuine pupil would find the analytic phrase in +"{Th}ey {k}i{l}l a{l}l" (1755). + +Andrew Jackson, the seventh President, died in 1845. The unindustrious +pupil imagines that "p" represents 8, and not "f" or "v," and translates +1845 into "{T}o {p}ou{r} oi{l}" (1945). The diligent student finds an +analytic translation of the date in the phrase "{Th}e {f}a{r}ewe{l}l" +(1845). + +These illustrations are sufficient to convince any one that the Figure +Alphabet must be _mastered_ before the attempt is made to deal with +dates and numbers. + +(2) THE PUPIL MUST POSSESS SUCH A MASTERY OF THE SUBJECT MATTER THAT HE +CAN INSTANTLY RECALL FACTS RELATING THERETO ON THE LINES OF IN., EX., +AND CON. If he lacks such knowledge he had better deal with dates and +numbers which he must remember by synthesis [hereafter], or by Numeric +Thinking, rather than strive in vain to find _analytic_ date and number +words. + + 1. What mistake does the impatient pupil make? + 2. Does this not convince you that the figure alphabet must be + mastered before the attempt is made to deal with dates? + 3. What is the second requisite to becoming proficient in forming + analytic date words? + 4. What should the pupil do if he lacks the knowledge indicated + here? + 5. If the pupil fixes in mind the population of three States per + day, how long will it take him to learn the population of all + the American States? + 6. How long to deal in like manner with the population of all the + countries of the globe? + +It is said that there are 1,750 spoken languages. If the pupil does not +know that the tongue is moved in different ways to pronounce the +distinctive sounds of different languages, he might not think of this +analytic translation of (1750), "{T}o{ng}ue a{l}l way{s}." + +The population of Kentucky according to the last census (1880) was +1,648,690. Those who do not know the Kentuckians raise fine saddle and +race horses, many of which are bays, might not think of the analytic +phrases, "{T}ea{ch}e{r} o{f} {sh}owy {b}ay{s}," or "{T}ea{ch}e{r} o{f} a +{sh}owy {p}a{c}e." + +The estimated number of horses in the world is 58,576,322. Those who do +not know how cruelly coachmen often treat the horses under their charge +might not think of the analytic phrase, "Wi{l}l {f}ee{l} {c}oa{ch}{m}e{n} +{n}ow." + +The Yellowstone National Park contains 2,294,740 acres. One who does not +know that this park was recently created, might not think of the +analytic phrase, "O{n}e {N}ew {P}a{r}{k} a{r}o{s}e." + +The U. S. Government paid out in the year 1865 the sum of +$1,297,555,324. If one wished to remember the exact figures, he could +easily find an analytic phrase, if he thinks of the act of delivering or +handing over the money, as "{Th}ey u{n}{p}a{ck} {l}oya{l}ly a{l}l +{m}o{n}ey he{r}e." If any analytic phrase is long or awkwardly +constructed, it is very easy to memorise it by the analytic-synthetic +method; as (1) They unpack. (2) They unpack _money_. (3) They unpack +money _here_. (4) They unpack _all_ money here. (5) They unpack _loyally_ +all money here. + +The number of letters delivered in Great Britain during the postal year +of 1881-82 was 1,280,636,200. If the student knows that the Central Post +Office of London is a very large building, he could instantly find the +analytic phrase, "Wi{th}i{n} o{f}fi{c}e hu{g}e {m}u{ch} {n}ew{s} we +{s}ee." + +The amount lost annually by fire in the United States is estimated at +$112,853,784. If we do not go outside of the subject matter of losses by +fire, we shall readily find an analytic phrase by means of which we can +certainly remember that large number of dollars--"A {d}eb{t} o{n} +{f}{l}a{m}i{ng} {f}i{r}e." + +There are 653,020 Freemasons in U. S. A. Those who know what is meant by +the phrase, "From labor to refreshment," in the masonic ritual, will at +once translate those figures into the analytic phrase, "{J}o{l}ly +{M}a{s}o{n}{s}." + +There are 591,800 Odd Fellows in the United States. Notice if you can +find figures to translate "Odd" or "Fellows," or any other fact +pertaining to the Order, and you have the analytic phrase, "A{l}l +ha{p}py 'O{d}d' {f}a{c}e{s}." + +There have been granted 428,212 patents in the United States. Can you +find any word pertaining to patents in those figures? "We he{r}e +i{n}{v}e{n}{t} a{n}ew." + +The number of Indians in the United States is estimated as 241,329. +Considering how unkindly treated many of them have been, we find an +analytic phrase which fits the fact--"{N}o {r}e{d} {m}a{n} ha{p}py." + +The population of the state of New York in 1880 was five millions, +eighty-two thousand, eight hundred and seventy-one (5,082,871). An +analytic phrase founded on any conspicuous characteristic of the +population, or on any prominent aspect of the geography of the State +[Niagara Falls, for instance], which many of its people have witnessed, +would suffice, or "A (5) {L}egal (0) {C}ensus (8) O{f} (2) {N}ew-York's +(8) {F}olks (7) {C}omprising (1) Eigh{t}y's." + +The pupil who conscientiously studies the rules and examples in this +lesson will find that he can have the great satisfaction of always being +exact and reliable in regard to numbers. + + 1. Give an original analytic phrase expressing the number of acres + in Yellowstone National Park. + 2. Why do we not give all three of the l's in the word "loyally" a + figure value? + 3. In translating the word "debt," why is it not 191 instead of 11? + 4. What makes these phrases easy to remember? + 5. Give an analytic phrase expressing the number of patents granted + in the United States. + 6. What great satisfaction can the conscientious pupil always have? + 7. Suppose, when the pupil reaches this page, he has learned that + the number of the population, or of patents, or of Masons, Odd + Fellows, &c., has changed, what is he to do? + 8. Must he not deal with the latest statement of the fact, and find + his own analytic number words? + + +DATES OF THE ACCESSION OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTS. + +The date-words opposite each name can be learned by _one_ careful +analytic perusal. If the relation is not understood in any case, a +glance at the explanations which follow the series of Presidents will +remove all doubt or difficulty. + + [*]GEORGE WASHINGTON {F}a{b}ian (1789). + JOHN ADAMS {B}i{ck}erings (1797). + [*]THOMAS JEFFERSON {S}{t}eed (1801). + [*]JAMES MADISON {S}{p}eculative (1809). + [*]JAMES MONROE {D}o{c}trine (1817). + JOHN Q. ADAMS U{n}{l}ucky (1825). + [*]ANDREW JACKSON U{n}whi{p}ped (1829). + MARTIN VAN BUREN {M}o{ck}ed (1837). + [+]WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON Ha{r}{d} cider (1841). + JOHN TYLER {R}u{d}derless (1841). + JAMES K. POLK {R}ea{l}m-extender (1845). + [+]ZACHARY TAYLOR Wa{r}{p}roof (1849). + MILLARD FILLMORE {L}i{c}enser (1850). + FRANKLIN PIERCE {L}oo{m}ing (1853). + JAMES BUCHANAN {L}e{c}ompton (1857). + [*]ABRAHAM LINCOLN A{g}i{t}ation (1861). + ANDREW JOHNSON {Sh}a{l}l (1865). + [*]ULYSSES S. GRANT {Ch}a{p}ultepec (1869). + RUTHERFORD B. HAYES {C}o{c}oa (1877). + [+]JAMES A. GARFIELD {F}a{t}al (1881). + CHESTER A. ARTHUR A{f}{t}er (1881). + GROVER CLEVELAND {F}{l}ood (1885). + BENJAMIN HARRISON {F}i{b}rous (1889). + GROVER CLEVELAND {B}oo{m} (1893). + +[*] Those who were in office more than four years were re-elected for a +second term. The second term always began four years after the beginning +of the first term. + +[+] Those who were Presidents for less than four years died in office +and were succeeded by Vice-Presidents. President Lincoln was murdered +forty days after the commencement of his second term of office, when +Vice-President Johnson became the 17th President. + + 1. How can the date-words opposite each name be learned? + 2. What must be done in case the relation is not understood? + 3. What is the relation between William Henry Harrison and "Hard + cider"? + 4. Why would not "Sweet cider" do? + 5. What Presidents served more than one term? + 6. How is this indicated? + 7. How many died in office? + 8. When is the pupil supposed to learn the series of Presidents? + +REMARKS.--The pupil is presumed to have learned heretofore the series of +Presidents from Washington to Grover Cleveland, and to have recited it +forwards and backwards many times. Now let him learn the dates of their +accession to office, and then let him recite the series both ways in +connection with those dates several times: as, George Washington, 1789; +John Adams, 1797; Thomas Jefferson, 1801, &c., &c., to Grover Cleveland, +1893 and then back to Washington. Although it is much better for the +pupil to find his own analytic date-words, yet, as many may not have the +time to do so while studying this lesson, I append a few explanations of +the facts on which the above analytic date-words are founded. + +"'Fabian' was applied to the military tactics of Washington, on some +occasions, when he imitated the policy of Quintus Fabius Maximus +Verrucosus, a Roman General who not daring to hazard a battle against +Hannibal, harassed his army by marches, counter-marches, and +ambuscades." "Bickerings" were incessant during John Adams's +administration between his own supporters and the faction of Hamilton. +"Steed"--Jefferson rode on horseback to the Capitol to take his oath of +office as President. Arrived there he dismounted and fastened his steed +to an elm-tree, since known as Jefferson's tree. He did this to +signalise his disapprobation of royalty, and his preference for +democratic equality. "Speculative" were the celebrated "Madison Papers." +"Doctrine"--the Monroe doctrine declared that no foreign power should +acquire additional dominion in America. "Unlucky" was correctly applied +to John Quincy Adams's administration. See Barnes's U. S. His., +p. 175. "Unwhipped"--Jackson always came off victorious in all his +duels and military campaigns. "Mocked"--Van Buren was appointed by +Jackson as U. S. Minister to England. The United States Senate rejected +his nomination. This political insult secured much sympathy for him, +and helped to make him President. "Hard-cider" was a party watchword +during Harrison's campaign for the Presidency. "Rudderless"--Tyler +often changed his political views, and finally turned against +the United States Government, of which he had been Chief Executive. +"Realm-extender"--during Polk's administration the United States +acquired the territory embracing California, Arizona, New +Mexico, and Texas. "Warproof"--Taylor was a successful warrior. +"Licenser"--Fillmore's administration passed the Fugitive Slave Law, +which enabled the Southern masters to recapture runaway slaves. +"Looming"--during Pierce's term the cloud of civil war was looming up in +the distance. "Lecompton" constitution of Kansas was a pro-slavery +document which Buchanan favoured. "Agitation" preceded and attended +Lincoln's inauguration, and finally culminated in the civil war. +"Shall"--Johnson made use of the imperative "shall" in regard to the +removal of Edwin M. Stanton, for which attempt he was afterward sought +to be impeached. "Chapultepec" was the battle in which Grant entered +upon that career of military achievement which secured him two +Presidential terms. "Cocoa" was characteristic of the drinks allowed at +Hayes's table at the White House. No wine was tolerated. "Fatal" was +Guiteau's shot to Garfield. "After"--although Tyler, Fillmore, Johnson, +and Arthur became Presidents on the death of their chiefs, yet only +Arthur succeeded to the Presidency in 1881, which is indicated by the +first two consonants of "After." "Flood"--Cleveland vetoed an +unprecedented number of bills during his term. There was a "flood" of +them. "Fibrous" applies metaphorically to mental qualities; it means +strong, sinewy--high talents, just below genius. "Boom" refers, of +course, to the large amount of support which Cleveland obtained on his +second election to the Presidency. + + 1. Should the pupil find his own analytic date-words in this + exercise? + 2. How were Washington's military tactics sometimes characterised? + 3. What is the relation between "Bickerings" and John Adams? + 4. Why is "Steed" analytic of Jefferson's inauguration? + 5. What has the word "Doctrine" to do with Monroe's administration? + 6. To what book is the pupil especially referred in regard to J. Q. + Adams's administration? + 7. Is "Mocked" a case of Con. or Ex. in the case of Van Buren? + + +DATES OF THE ACCESSION OF THE ENGLISH SOVEREIGNS. + +From 1000 A.D. to 1700 A.D., the last _three figures only_ need be +given, and from 1700 A.D. to date only the last two figures require to +be given. It is better for the pupil to find his own phrases. A slight +acquaintance with English History will make all the formulas here given +easily understood. Green's short "History of the English People," +Dickens' "Child's History of England," Collier's "History of England," +and "History of England," by the author of the "Knights of St. John," +may be recommended. + + (1) William I. (1066)--(0) Ha{s}tings (6) {ch}ampion (6) + {j}ustified. + (2) William II. (1087)--He (1) {d}ecorated (0) hi{s} (8) {f}ather's + (7) {g}rave; or (0) {s}ilvering a (8) {f}ather's (7) {g}rave. + (3) Henry I. (1100)--(1) {Th}e (0) {s}cholarly (0) {s}overeign. + (4) Stephen (1135)--(1) {Th}e (3) {m}onarch's (5) {l}iar. + (5) Henry II. (1154)--(1) {Th}e (5) {l}and (4) {r}estorer. + (6) Richard I. (1189)--(1) {Th}e (8) {f}awners (9) {p}unished. + (7) John (1199)--(1) {D}epriving a (9) {p}retty (9) {b}oy. + (8) Henry III. (1216)--(1) "{Th}ird" (2) He{n}ry's (1) {t}ender (6) + {ch}ildhood. + (9) Edward I. (1272)--(2) O{n} a (7) {c}rusade (2) u{n}supported. + (10) Edward II. (1307)--(3) A {m}onarch (0) e{s}pouses a (7) + {c}omrade. + (11) Edward III. (1327)--He (3) {m}ade (2) Wi{n}dsor (7) {C}astle. + (12) Richard II. (1377)--A (3) {m}onarch's (7) {c}ollector (7) + {k}illed. + (13) Henry IV. (1399)--A (3) {m}onarch (9) {p}unished (9) + {b}orderers. + (14) Henry V. (1413)--A (4) {r}ioter (1) {t}urned (3) {m}onarch. + (15) Henry VI. (1422)--(4) {R}oyalty (2) i{n} (2) i{n}fancy; or (4) + A{r}c (2) u{n}justly (2) i{n}flamed. + (16) Edward IV. (1461)--(4) Yo{r}k (6) {ch}ampioned (1) {T}owton. + (17) Edward V. (1483)--(4) {R}uler (8) "{F}ifth" (3) {m}urdered. + (18) Richard III. (1483)--(4) {R}ichard (8) {f}eigns (3) {m}odesty. + (19) Henry VII. (1486)--(4) {R}oses (8) {f}inally (6) {j}oined. + (20) Henry VIII. (1509)--A (5) {l}ady (0) {s}laying (9) {p}olicy. + (21) Edward VI. (1547)--A (5) {l}ad (4) {r}oyally (7) {g}ood; or, a + (5) wi{l}l (4) {r}equiring a (7) {c}ouncil. + (22) Mary (1553)--(5) {L}uckless (5) {l}oving (3) {M}ary. + (23) Elizabeth (1558)--(5) E{l}izabeth (5) {l}iked (8) {v}etoes. + (24) James I. (1603)--(6) {J}ames a (0) {S}cottish (3) {m}onarch. + (25) Charles I. (1625)--(6) {Ch}arles' (2) i{n}supportable (5) + i{l}legalities. + (26) Council and Parliament (1649)--(6) {Ch}arles (4) {r}ightly (9) + {b}eheaded. + (27) Oliver Cromwell (1653)--(6) {G}eneral (5) O{l}iver's (3) + {m}astery. + (28) Richard Cromwell (1658)--(6) {G}eneral (5) O{l}iver's (8) + o{f}fspring. + (29) Council and Parliament (1659)--A (6) {J}unta (5) {l}eading (9) + {P}arliament. + (30) Charles II. (1660)--(6) {Ch}eerful (6) {Ch}arles (0) {S}econd. + (31) James II. (1685)--(6) {J}ames' (8) {f}ollowers (5) e{l}ated. + (32) William III. and Mary (1689)--(6) {J}oining (8) o{f} (9) + {P}owers. + (33) Anne (1702)--(0) {S}ubmissive (2) A{n}ne. + (34) George I. (1714)--(1) U{t}terly (4) {r}esigned. + (35) George II. (1727)--(2) A{n}spach's (7) {C}aroline. + (36) George III. (1760)--(6) {G}eorge's (0) {S}overeignty. + (37) George IV. (1820)--(2) U{n}divorcible (0) {S}overeign. + (38) William IV. (1830)--(3) {M}idshipman (0) {S}overeign. + (39) Victoria (1837)--A (3) {m}odel (7) Queen. + + +EXPLANATIONS. + +(1) Edward the Confessor, always fond of the Normans, had promised that +on his death his kingdom should go to Duke William of Normandy. (2) +William II. early directed a goldsmith to decorate his father's grave +with gold and silver ornaments. (3) Henry I. was called Beauclerc, or +fine Scholar. (4) Stephen had produced a false witness to swear that the +late king on his deathbed had named him (Stephen) as his heir. (5) +Henry II. revoked most of the grants of land that had been hastily made +during the late troubles. (6) Richard punished the people who had +befriended him against his father. (7) Arthur had the best right to the +throne, but John imprisoned and murdered him. (8) Henry III. was crowned +at the age of ten. "Third" tells _which_ Henry is meant. (9) Edward I. +declared--"I will go on, if I go on with no other follower than my +groom." (10) Gaveston was the king's comrade and favourite, and was +finally beheaded by the indignant barons. (11) Edward III. erected +Windsor Castle. (12) The king's poll-tax collector was killed by Wat +Tyler. (13) A successful Scottish war was this monarch's first +achievement. (14) Riotous Prince Hal became a spirited, valiant king. +(15) Henry VI. was only nine months old when his predecessor died. (16) +Edward IV., with aid of the Earl of Warwick, won the great battle at +Towton; 40,000 men were slain. (17) Edward V. was only thirteen years +old. The Lord Protector, Duke of Gloucester, threw him, with his +brother, into the Tower and caused them to be murdered. (18) Richard's +affected modesty is conspicuously brought out in Shakespeare's tragedy +of Richard III. (19) Henry VII., to quell forever the hostility of the +rival Roses, married Elizabeth of York, the daughter of Edward IV. (20) +The formula in this case is clearly justified by history. (21) +Edward VI. was but ten years old. Henry VIII. had provided in his will +that a council of sixteen should govern during Edward's minority. (22) +Mary was fond of her husband, who cared little for her, and unlucky in +her advisers. (23) Elizabeth showed the natural arbitrariness of her +disposition in her vetoes. In one year--1597--she refused the royal +assent to 48 bills passed by the Commons. (24) James I. was the first +Scottish king that reigned over England. (25) Charles I. lost his life +in the attempt to act independent of the Commons. (26) If anyone thinks +that Charles was not rightfully beheaded, he could make the phrase--(6) +{Ch}arles (4) w{r}ongfully (9) {b}eheaded. (27) The phrase is obviously +true. (28) The phrase gives the exact date of Richard Cromwell's +accession and the word "offspring" means Richard Cromwell. (29) A Junta +here means the "council." (30) Charles Second was called the "merry" +monarch. (31) Parliament at once voted James II. nearly two million +pounds sterling per annum for life. (32) William and Mary were +cooerdinate sovereigns. (33) Anne was truly "submissive" or easily +influenced. (34 and 35) Green intimates that George I. and George II. +hardly affected the course of events--the former followed the advice of +his ministers and the latter of his wife Caroline. (36) George III. was +emphatically a sovereign. (37) George IV. had tried ineffectually to get +rid of his wife; her death at last released him. (38) William IV. had +been a midshipman in the navy. (39) Victoria has certainly proved +herself to be a "Model Queen." + +(3) THE PUPIL MUST POSSESS SUCH A FAMILIARITY WITH THE LAWS OF IN., EX., +AND CON., NOT MERELY IN THEIR THEORETIC AND ABSTRACT ASPECTS, BUT IN +THAT PRACTICAL CHARACTER AND WORKING POWER OF THEM WHICH I TEACH, THAT +HE CAN INSTANTLY APPLY THEM TO THE EVERY-DAY AFFAIRS AND ORDINARY +OCCURRENCES AND EVENTS OF LIFE. + +If you know that the number of square[E] miles in the area of the State +of New York runs into _thousands_, and you wish to remember that the +_exact number_ of thousands is 47, you could accomplish this object if +you found a word which spells 47, and is at the same time connected by +In., Ex., or Con. to New York. You try the varieties of Inclusion; and +in synonymous Inclusion you find 47 in the word "Yo{r}{k}" itself, the +"y" having no figure value, and "r" standing for 4, and "k" for 7; thus +you cannot _see_ the name of New York or _think of it_ without having +conclusive evidence of the number of thousands of square miles the State +contains. + +[E] See Lippincott's Gazetteer, p. 1573. + +The title of a subject, the name or description of an event or date, can +always be safely abridged or bracketed in part in the formula, as 47 +[New] Yo{r}{k}. But no one could imagine that "York" in this connection +[47 thousand square miles] means any of the towns or country seats of +the United States which are called "York." If the context makes an +otherwise indefinite thing definite, it is sufficient. + +_Analytic date and number words do not have to be memorised._--Seeing is +believing, and, in this case, _remembering_ too. If you thoroughly +master my system you can find, in most cases, analytic date and number +words without any difficulty, and by means of them you can remember +_thousands_ of dates and sets of figures, when without the system you +could have remembered only five or ten of them. + +Suppose in your haste you failed to notice that "York" spells 47, and +you then proceed to try Inclusion by Genus and Species; regarding York +as the general word, you would find _New_ York as a species or kind of +York; the same with Yorkshire, Yorktown, York Minster, etc. In this way +you would, if your mastery of the Figure Alphabet were perfect, scarcely +fail to notice that York spells 47; but if you fail, you then try +Inclusion by Whole and Part, and run over the political divisions of the +State until you come to {R}o{ck}land County, and there you find in its +first two consonants the letters "r" and "ck" (the equivalent of "k" in +sound). These consonants spell 47. You would find the same consonants in +the County of He{r}{k}imer. + +Suppose, however, that from unfamiliarity with the Figure Alphabet, or +from want of considerable practice, you do not succeed in noticing that +{R}o{ck}land or He{r}{k}imer contains the number 47, you try Inclusion by +Abstract and Concrete, and regarding the State of New York as the +Concrete, and the Abstract or characterizing epithet "{r}o{ck}y" as +applicable to New York, you would then find in that word "{r}o{ck}y" the +number 47. + +If you did fail, you would try Exclusion, and you would find nothing +which is the antithesis of the area of New York. You might find, +however, a _weak form_ of Exclusion if you consider that the area is the +surface, and what is below the surface as the opposite of it. In the +latter case you would find in the words "E{r}ie {C}anal," which is a +great artificial channel running through a part of the State, the +letters "r" and "c" hard, which spell 47. A more exact Exclusion might +be found in the word "{r}i{ng}," which spells 47. For if we consider the +shape of the boundary of New York we would see that in no vague sense a +ring, as a circle, is the opposite of it. + +But suppose that from a chronic absent-mindedness or an overworked +brain, or downright bad physical health or insufficient knowledge of the +system, you failed to see 47 in any of the foregoing cases, you would +try Concurrence. Considering that the State of New York is largely +agricultural, you would find that the implement of farming known as a +"{R}a{k}e" would spell 47; this would be a case of Concurrence. In a +political sense, the word "{r}i{ng}s" gives 47, as New York has been +celebrated for them. + +All that the student requires is _one_ analytic word. I have gone +through the varieties of Inclusion, through Exclusion, and Concurrence, +merely to show _how to find_ analytic words and not because more than +one word was necessary. + +According to the census report of 1890, the number of square miles of +_land_ in the State of New York is 47,620, or (4) Yo{r}k's (7) A{c}res +(6) {S}urely (2) {N}ot (0) {S}ubmerged; the number of square miles of +_land and water_ in it is 49,170, or (4) Yo{r}k's (9) {P}lains (1) +Wi{th} (7) A{c}companying (0) {S}ealets. + + +NUMBER OF SHAKESPEARE'S PLAYS. + +We will try another case: You want to remember the number of plays that +Shakespeare wrote. You know it is less than 50; but you wish to remember +the exact number--it was 37. You experiment; you try the varieties of +Inclusion, and among the rest you try Whole and Part; you find in the +first two consonants of the name {M}a{c}beth the figures 37; but if you +did not notice that {M}a{c}beth afforded you the means of always +remembering that the Shakespeare Plays numbered 37, you would try +Exclusion perhaps. If you look upon the attempt to ascribe the +authorship of the Shakespeare Plays to Bacon as a {m}o{ck}ery you would +find in the first two consonants of that word the figures 37 through the +operation of Exclusion; and if you recollect that the character of +Shylock was played with great success at Old Drury, February 17, 1741, +by Charles {M}a{c}lin, you would find in the first two consonants of his +name the figures 37 through Concurrence. + + +DUKE OF WELLINGTON AND NAPOLEON. + +Napoleon Bonaparte was born in 1769. As a boy he was finely formed. +"{Sh}a{p}ely" (69) gives his birth-date by In. by A. and C. He evinced +the opposite of the temper usually ascribed to the "{Sh}e{p}herd-boy" +(69)--a birth-date by Ex. "{Ch}a{p}let"--a wreath or garland signed +for by him in his ambitious hopes--expresses his birth-date by Con. His +death occurred in 1821. "E{n}{d}" (21) or "U{n}{d}one" (21) expresses +his death-date by synonymous Inclusion. "{N}a{t}ivity" (21) indicates it +by Ex. Since he died from cancer in the stomach, he could retain very +little food. "I{n}{d}igestion" (21) makes his death-date by Con. + +Wellington's birth, in 1769, may be expressed by "{Sh}ee{p}-faced" (69), +a term his own mother applied to him when a boy. In his childhood, he +was blue-eyed, hawk-nosed, slender, and ungainly, "{Ch}u{b}by" (69), by +Ex., expresses his birth-date. A more vivid concurrence can scarcely be +imagined, since he and Bonaparte were both born in the same year, 1769. + +Wellington died in 1852 at Wilmer Castle. "Wi{l}{m}er" expresses the date +of his death by only one year too many. But a means of remembrance that +requires readjustment or modification can seldom be relied upon, except +by those who are practised in Higher Analysis. He was 83 years old when +he died. "{L}a{n}tern-jawed" (52) expresses his death-date by In., by A. +and C. No man was ever more honored after his death than Wellington. +"A{l}ie{n}ated" (52) expresses his death-date by Ex. A sudden illness +carried him off. Hence "I{l}l{n}ess" (52) is a fact connected with his +death by Con. + +These elaborate illustrations must indicate to any student how to apply +the laws of In., Ex., and Con., so as to find analytic date and number +words. Cases of Ex. give good practice, but are rarely ever necessary. + + +MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES. + +_Inclusion_, as applied to the events of life possesses the same variety +as in regard to words. In dates of the last and present century, the +expression of the _last two figures_ is sufficient. William Cullen +Bryant was born in 1794. '94 is found in the name {B}{r}yant, a case of +Synonymous Inclusion. Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel in +1804. As we know it was about the beginning of this century, this +translation of the 4 indicates the exact date and is found in Aa{r}on +and relieves the memory of all doubt. + + 1. Who applied the term "sheep-faced" to Wellington when he was a + boy? + 2. What is the most vivid case of Con. here given? + 3. Why do we not give a value to both l's in the word "illness"? + 4. What do these illustrations indicate? + 5. What does inclusion as applied to the events of life possess? + 6. Why is it not necessary to have a date-word to express the date + of Hamilton's death in which the 0 is indicated as well as the 4? + +Sherman made his famous march through the South in 1864. 64 is found in +the word {Sh}e{r}man [or by two words: (6) {Sh}erman (4) {R}avaging]. In +dates previous to the last century, the last three figures must be +expressed. Movable types were invented in 1438. We know it was not +A.D. 438, but was 1438; a mistake of 1,000 years is not possible. If we +translate 438 it will mean to us the same as 1438. 438 is found in the +analytic word (438) "{R}e{m}o{v}able" [or, to express all the numbers, +thus: (1) {T}ypes (4) a{r}e (3) {m}ovable (8) {f}igures]. + +The Phonograph was invented in 1877. The expression of 77 is found in +{C}o{g}nate, and that indicates the resemblance of the human mechanism +to receive sounds to the Phonograph; for both processes utilize +vibrations, and are therefore from similarity of functions "Cognate" +methods. How any one could forget analytic date-words is more than I can +understand, especially when formed by himself. + + 1. What must be done when we wish to find date-words the events of + which took place previous to the last century? + 2. Can a person easily forget analytic date-words formed by + himself? + +_Exclusion._--The first steamship crossed the Atlantic in 1819. 19 is +found in "{T}u{b}" by Exclusion, as the most opposite to a steam-driven +ship. Andrew Johnson was advanced to the Presidency on the death of +Abraham Lincoln in 1865. 65 is expressed by Exclusion in the word +"{Sh}e{l}ved," which means the opposite of promotion [or by two words, +thus: (6) {J}ohnson (5) E{l}evated]. "{M}e{n}dacious" expresses by +Exclusion the birth of George Washington in 1732, as indicating a +youthful quality the opposite of that which he manifested, and by two +words: (3) A{m}erica's (2) I{n}fant. Other examples are given in +subsequent pages. + +_Concurrence_ finds incidents or concomitants of a fact or event, +something that by accident became connected with it. It may be a +forerunner or successor, the cause or consequence, or a contemporaneous +fact, etc. + +William Cullen Bryant, from a fall, died in 1878. The last two figures +78 are found by Concurrence in the initial consonants of the phrase "(7) +{C}ullen's (8) {F}all." Cullen will be easily identified, as the middle +name of Bryant. When Jefferson became Vice-President, in 1797, he wore +the customary big-wig; and the first two consonants of "{B}i{g}-wig" +express by Concurrence that date. + +Artillery was invented in 1340. 340 indicates that date, and by +Concurrence we find those figures in the first three consonants of +"{M}e{r}{c}iless." Or (3) {M}urderous (4) A{r}tillery's (0) {S}courge. +Plymouth (Mass.) was settled in 1620. 620 will indicate it. We find +these figures in "{Ch}a{n}{c}e," which by Concurrence describes the risk +they ran. The Telephone was invented in 1877. Whoever has listened to +the telephone to identify a speaker, and heard others talking in the +shrill tones that strike upon the ear, is apt to think of the cackling +of hens, and "{C}a{ck}le" expresses the date 77. + +Jefferson Davis disguised himself in the hood, shawl, and dress of his +wife in 1865. "{Sh}aw{l}" by Concurrence expresses that date. The +Constitution of the United States was _adopted_ in 1787, which spells +"{Th}e {G}i{v}i{ng}." To adopt the Constitution, it required the States +to give their assent. They _gave_ the Federal Government all the power +it possessed. "{Th}e {G}i{v}i{ng}" is therefore a case of Concurrence. A +circumstance connected with settlements is _selecting_ the site. +Jamestown, Va., was settled in 1607, which spells "{Th}e {Ch}oo{s}i{ng}." +This phrase relates to the settlement by Concurrence. Harvard College +was founded in 1636, which spells "{T}ea{ch} {M}u{ch}." Whether we take +this phrase as describing the object or result of founding that college, +it is a case of Concurrence. A college is sometimes called a seat of +learning. Yale College was founded in 1701, which spells "{T}oo{k} a +{s}ea{t}." This phrase describes the locating of the college, and is +therefore a relation by Concurrence. + +(4) THE PUPIL MUST SEEK _ANALYTIC_ WORDS WHICH ARE _APPROXIMATELY +SPECIFIC_, AS BIRTH-DATE WORDS MUST, WHERE POSSIBLE, RELATE TO BIRTH OR +JUVENILE EVENTS; MARRIAGE-DATE WORDS, TO EVENTS CONNECTED NEARLY OR +REMOTELY WITH THE MARRIAGE; DATE WORDS FOR ANY OTHER EVENT IN LIFE OR +FACT IN HISTORY SHOULD, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, RELATE TO SUCH EVENT +OR FACT; AND, FINALLY, DEATH-DATE WORDS SHOULD REFER TO INCIDENTS WHICH +PRECEDED, ACCOMPANIED, OR FOLLOWED THE FACT OF THE DEATH. + +This rule, theoretically correct, must be very liberally interpreted in +practice. This lesson furnishes numerous illustrative examples. + +As shown heretofore, _the pupil must know the facts_, and the System +will then help him to fix their date. + +A pupil had loaned money to a horse-dealer who lived at No. 715 of a +certain street. He knew the house well, yet he could not recollect the +number 715. At length he thought of "{C}a{t}t{l}e" as a figure word to +enable him to remember the number. Yet the word is general and +apparently unconnected with the house, as it was not a stable but a +boarding-house. Yet, as cattle and horse are species of the genus +domestic animal, and cattle would recall horses and horse-dealer, he did +right to use that term, and it served him well. At first he instantly +recalled the word "cattle" whenever he thought of the horse-dealer's +residence, and at once 715 was given him. After a time, he directly +recalled 715 without first thinking of "cattle." This is always the case +where the method is applied. It is soon no longer required in that case. +When this pupil told me what he had done, I asked him why he had not +used the phrase "(7) {C}ollect (1) {Th}e (5) {L}oan," which was the +object he had in view in thinking of, or of sending to, that address. +His reply was that "cattle" served his purpose. With one person a single +word, with another a phrase, and with another a sentence, is most +serviceable. He had other borrowers who lived at other places. Why could +this phrase "Collect the loan," which would apply in its meaning to the +case of others, remind him of this particular debtor's home? Because, if +he had consciously devised that phrase to identify this debtor's +address, it could apply in his mind to the address of no other debtor. +Thus the _facts help us devise the number phrase, and the phrase helps +revive the facts_. + +I do not, for instance, undertake in this lesson to teach the pupil that +Washington never left America but once, when he accompanied his invalid +brother to Barbadoes in 1751, in search of health. But if he knows these +facts, my method helps him retain the date, by using those facts for +this purpose; as, (1) {T}o (7) {G}ain (5) Is{l}and (1) {T}onic; or +(17)51 Hea{l}{th}. We know that "health" is an object with everybody in +all countries and in all ages, and is therefore a word of the most +general character and of the most extended application. How, then, can +it have any _special_ significance in this case? Because by knowing the +facts, in the first place, as "health" was the object of the visit of +Washington and his brother; and seeking for a date word which spells +(17)51, the pupil has discovered that this general word "health" spells +that date; and, as the pupil has applied the word "health" to this date +and to no other, he has thus made the general word specific for his +purpose. Because "tonic" is a health promoter, and "island" is a help to +recall the specific Islands of Barbadoes, the phrase (1) "{T}o (7) +{G}ain (5) Is{l}and (1) {T}onic," is more specific than "health." But +either the single word or phrase becomes specific, if the facts of the +case are assimilated, and then by the pupil are applied to furnish a +date word. + + +BIOGRAPHY, HISTORY, AND SCIENCE. + +Much of the substance and pith of historic eras can be expressed in the +analytic words, phrases, or sentences with which their dates are +enunciated. If the foregoing and subsequent examples are carefully, not +hurriedly, studied, the student can readily hereafter retain a great +deal of the significance of facts, events, or epochs by his infallible +recollection of the analytic expression of their dates. As with history, +so with the arts and science, etc. + +Population of the United States of America is now (1895) 67,000,000 = +{G}eneral {C}ultivation or {Sh}arp Yan{k}ees. When dealing with the +_number_ of millions or thousands only, it is not necessary to express +the ciphers. Pop. of Great Britain = 38,000,000, or (3) {M}ightiest (8) +{F}olks; or {M}anufacturing {F}abrics; or {M}oney-making {F}reetraders. +Pop. of Africa, 127,000,000 = {Th}e {N}egro Continent. Pop. of Bombay += 804,470 or {F}oreigners a{s} a {r}ule a{r}e E{ng}lish {C}itizens. + +A gentleman in Bombay, who had to deal with complaints about water +supplies there, told me the true population is 817,564, which he fixed +by my method as follows: {F}rightful {T}o {K}eep A{l}l {J}ust {R}ight. + +Pop. of Calcutta = 840,000; or {V}iceroy's {R}esidential {S}eat. Pop. of +India = 292,000,000; or I{n}dia's {P}opulation E{n}umerated. + +Pop. of Australasia, &c., 4,250,000 = Ou{r} I{n}dependent {L}iving +Au{s}tralians. + +Pop. of Melbourne with its suburbs (1891) = 490,912 = (4) Ou{r} (9) +{B}iggest (0) {C}ity's (9) {B}uildings (1) {d}ecidedly (2) +u{n}equalled. The "City" contains 73,361 = (7) {G}reat (3) {M}elbourne +(3) {M}akes a (6) {Ch}ief (1) {T}own. + +Pop. of Sydney (1891) = 386,400 = A (3) {M}ost (8) {V}aried (6) +{Sh}eltering (4) Ha{r}bour (0) Ha{s} (0) {S}ydney. + +Pop. of Hobart (Tasmania), 1891 = 31,196; (3) {M}any (1) {T}asmanians +(1) Ea{t} (9) Ho{b}art's (6) {J}am. + +Pop. of Auckland (New Zealand), with suburbs, in (1891) = 51,287; (5) +A{l}l (1) {Th}e (2) I{n}habitants (8) O{f} (7) Au{ck}land. + + +SPECIFIC GRAVITIES. + +The Specific Gravity is the relative weight of a body compared to an +equal bulk of some other body taken as a standard. This standard is +usually water, for all liquids and solids, and air for gases. + + 1. Gold 19.2--{D}ollars {B}uy {S}u{n}dries.--Gold is made into + money. The specific gravity of gold is 19.2; + that is, nineteen and two-tenths. The initial + consonants of the phrase "{D}ollars {B}uy + {S}undries" express through "D" and "B" the + figures 19. The "S" of "Sundries" expresses + the decimal point, and the first subsequent + consonant "n" expresses the decimal two-tenths. + + 2. Silver 10.4--{Th}e {S}ilver A{s}saye{r}. + + 3. Platinum 21.5--U{n}usually {D}uctile {S}o{l}id.--Platinum is the + most ductile metal known. + + 4. Lead 11.3--{Th}e {T}in {S}{m}ith.--Lead is used to solder tin. + + 5. Mercury 13.5--{Th}e {M}ercury {S}o{l}d. + + 6. Copper 8.9--{V}iew a {Sp}ire.--Copper points the lightning + rods. + + 7. Iron 7.7--Hoo{k} {S}{k}illet.--It means hang up an iron pot. + + 8. Zinc 6.9--A {Sh}eet {S}u{p}ply.--Zinc is rolled into sheets. + + 9. Antimony 6.7--{G}erman {S}ee{k}er.--Antimony was discovered by + a German monk. + + 10. Calcium 1.0--Whi{t}e {C}eiling.--Calcium is used in + white-washing. + + +RIVERS. + + Mississippi (4,382 miles long).--{R}ushing {M}ississippi's wa{v}es + E{n}croach. + --The Mississippi River frequently + overflows its banks. + + Nile (3,370 mi.) --(3) {M}ighty (3) {M}editerranean's + (7) {G}reatest (0) {S}tream. + + Volga (2,400 mi.) --I{n} {R}ussia's {S}oil {S}uperior. + --The Volga is the largest river in + Russia, and, in fact, the largest + in Europe. + + Ohio (1,265 mi.) --{Th}e Ohio {N}ow {Sh}ips {L}ighters. + + Loire (530 mi.) --{L}oire's {M}ajestic {S}weep. + + Seine (470 mi.) --{R}olling {G}ay {S}eine. + + Spree (220 mi.) --{N}otice {N}oble {S}pree. + + Jordan (200 mi.) --A K{n}own {S}alty {S}olution. + --The River Jordan is impregnated + with considerable salt. + + 1. Why could we not substitute the phrase "{Th}e {M}ercury + {S}hie{l}d" for "{Th}e {M}ercury {s}o{l}d," since "S" stands for + "0," and "h" has no value? + 2. Why not use the phrase "Whi{t}e {s}ea{l}ing" to express the + Specific Gravity of Calcium? + 3. Could the Atomic Weight of Silver (108) be expressed by the + phrase "{Th}e {V}a{s}e?" + 4. If not, why not? + 5. Would the phrase "{Th}e {S}ilver {V}ase" be better? + 6. In dealing with the length of the Mississippi, why do you not + give the figure value of "W" and "E" in that part of the phrase + which includes the words {W}aves {E}ncroach? + 7. Would you indicate this value by a cipher, then? + 8. If not, why? + + +MOUNTAINS. + +Mt. Everest [29,002] {N}amed U{p}on a {S}urvey {S}trictly U{n}ique; or +I{n}dia's {P}eak I{s} {C}ertainly U{n}equalled.--This is the highest +mountain on the globe; or I{n}dia's {B}oundary {S}ummit I{s} +U{n}approachable. Kinchinjunga is 28,156 ft. high. We shall know what +Mountain is meant if we omit the first syllable "kin." Hence we can use +the formula, "{N}ext E{v}erest {D}awns {L}ofty {Ch}injunga." + + Popocatepetl (17,783 ft.)--{Th}e {G}reatest {C}rater o{f} {M}exico. + + Mt. Brown (16,000 ft.)--{Th}is {Ch}arming We{s}tern {S}cenery + {C}elebrated. + + Mt. Blanc (15,781 ft.)--{Th}is A{l}pine {C}one {F}ascinates + {T}ravellers. + + Jungfrau (13,720 ft.)--{Th}is {M}ountain A{g}assiz {N}imbly + A{s}cended. + --Prof. Agassiz was one of the first who + reached the summit of this mountain. + + Ben Nevis (4,406 ft.) --He{r}e {R}eview a {S}nowy {G}iant. + + Snowdon (3,570 ft.) --{M}ajestic Hi{l}ls {G}reet {S}nowdon. + + Saddleback (2,787 ft.) --{N}ear {K}eswick {V}iew a {C}raig. + --This mountain is situated near the town + of Keswick. + + 1. Are there any letters in the word "Ohio" which have a figure + value? + 2. Do you see any way by which you can make the word "Known" stand + for 2 by my figure alphabet? + 3. How can you infallibly retain these figure-sentences? + + +LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE. + +No one can have very definite or exact ideas of Geography who does not +know the Latitude and Longitude of the chief Cities of the +World. + + Lat. = 55 deg.--00' } (5) {L}ondon's (5) {L}atitude (0) Ea{s}ily + (1) LONDON } (0) {S}een. + Long. = 0 } (0) {S}tarting-point. + + Lat. = 40 deg.--52' } (4) Yo{r}k (0) {C}ity's (5) {L}atitude + (2) NEW YORK CITY } (2) {N}amed. + Long. = 73 deg.--59' } (7) {C}ommercial (3) {M}etropolis' + } (5) {L}ongitude (9) {P}ortrayed. + + Lat. = 40 deg.--00' } (4) {R}epublic's (0) {Z}ealous + (3) PHILADELPHIA } (0) {S}tatesman (0) {S}igned. + Long. = 75 deg.--10' } (7) {Q}uaker (5) {L}ongitude (1) {T}oo + } (0) {S}ober. + + Lat. 41 deg.--45' } (4) {R}ebuilt (1) {T}own's (4) {R}eal + (4) CHICAGO } (5) {L}atitude. + Long. = 87 deg.--50' } (8) {F}ires (7) {C}annot (5) {L}ongitude + } (0) {S}acrifice. + + Lat. = 42 deg.--20' } (4) Ha{r}vard (2) U{n}iversity's (2) {N}earest + (5) BOSTON } (0) {C}ity. + Long. = 71 deg.--05' } (7) {G}ives (1) {T}ea (0) {S}pillers' + } (5) {L}ongitude. + + Lat. = 30 deg.--00' } (3) {M}ississippi's (0) {S}outhernmost + (6) NEW ORLEANS } (0) {S}eaport (0) {S}erene. + Long. = 90 deg.--00' } (9) "{B}utler (0) {S}tole (0) {S}ilver + } (0) {S}poons."[F] + + Lat. = 39 deg.--41' } (3) {M}ountain (9) {P}eaks (4) O'e{r}look + (7) DENVER } (1) {D}enver. + Long. = 105 deg.--00' } (1) {D}enver's (0) {C}ertain (5) {L}ongitude + } (0) {S}afely (0) A{s}certained. + + Lat. = 37 deg.--30' } (3) {M}etallic (7) {C}alifornia's + (8) SAN FRANCISCO } (3) {M}etropolitan (0) {C}ity. + Long. = 122 deg.--00' } (1) {Th}e (2) {N}avigator (2) {N}ow (0) {S}ees + } (0) {S}an Francisco. + + Lat. = 34 deg.--19' } (3) {M}en (4) {R}elish (1) Ho{t} (9) {B}aths. + (9) HOT SPRINGS } + Long. = 93 deg.--00' } (9) {B}athing (3) {M}ust (0) {S}ave + } (0) {S}ickness. + + Lat. = 40 deg.--29 } (4) I{r}on (0) {S}melting (2) Hau{n}ts + (10) PITTSBURG } (9) {P}ittsburg. + Long. = 79 deg.--50' } (7) {G}reat (9) {P}ittsburg's (5) {L}ongitude + } (0) {S}ecured. + + Lat. = 43 deg.--02' } (4) {R}oaring (3) {M}agnificent (0) {C}easeless + (11) NIAGARA FALLS } (2) {N}iagara. + Long. = 79 deg.--12' } (7) A {C}ataract (9) {P}ours (1) A{t} + } (2) {N}iagara. + + Lat. = 18 deg.--53' } (1) {Th}e (8) {F}irst (5) Is{l}and (3) {M}et. + (12) BOMBAY } + Long. = 72 deg.--53' } (7) {K}ipling's (2) {N}ativity (5) We{l}l + } (3) {M}entioned. + + Lat. = 22 deg.--34' } (2) {N}umerous (2) {N}atives (3) {M}igrate + (13) CALCUTTA[G] } (4) He{r}e. + Long. = 88 deg.--24' } (8) A {V}iceroy (8) {F}avours (2) {N}atural + } (4) {R}emembering. + + Lat. = 37 deg.--49' (S) } (3) {M}elbourne's (7) {G}rounds (4) Ya{r}ra + (14) MELBOURNE } (9) {B}isects. + Long. = 44 deg.--58' (E) } (4) Ha{r}bour's (4) {R}iver (5) We{l}l + } (8) {F}urrowed. + + Lat. = 33 deg.--55' (S) } (3) {M}athematical (3) {M}apping (5) Wi{l}l + (15) CAPETOWN } (5) {L}ast. + Long. = 18 deg.--28' (E) } (1) {T}able Bay (8) {F}avours (2) {N}umerous + } (8) {V}essels. + +[F] No one supposes that Butler really stole spoons. + +[G] Lord Elgin, the present Viceroy, gave Prof. Loisette H. E.'s +patronage when the Professor lectured in Calcutta. As his system is the +foe of all artificial methods, it is _par excellence_ the "Natural" +System. + + +EARLY TRAINING IN FIGURES. + +If the mind-wandering mode of _rote_ learning is no longer practised, +but an _assimilating_ method is substituted for it; if we abolish the +"mind-wrecking" procedure of forcing immature minds into and through +studies which they cannot comprehend, and which, therefore, create +chronic habits of Inattention; and if the idea of numbers and their +elementary processes are _objectively_ taught, until habits of sure +enumeration and calculation are formed, then, when the child reaches +maturity, he will rarely if ever require any conscious aid in +remembering a series of 2, 3, 4, or more figures. + +Meantime, a thorough training in this system tends to do away with the +injurious effects of false mental habits; to set the Memory and +Attention at work in a natural way, and greatly strengthen both; and +while learning a large number of dates in a short time, or many figures +in one series may still require the use of the System, unless the +Numeric Thinking prior to this chapter has been mastered, yet, in the +ordinary way of meeting figures in reading, study, or business, there +will seldom occur any _necessity_ for resorting to the method taught in +this lesson. + + +WHAT MUST BE DONE FOR AN ACQUIRED ATTENTION. + +In the case of those who have not inherited, but who have _acquired_, a +great power of Attention, a decided _benefit_ will ensue, however, if +throughout life they occasionally use the System in regard to numbers +and in learning prose and poetry by the Analytic-Synthetic and +Interrogative Analysis Methods. + + 1. Will a pupil always require an aid to remember figures? + 2. What is required of him in order to enable him to do away with + any _conscious_ aid? + 3. What does a thorough training in my system accomplish in the + meantime? + 4. Will there ever be any _necessity_ of using the figure alphabet? + 5. Will not a decided benefit ensue to those who have acquired a + great power of attention? + +Where a great power of Attention has been renewed or originally +acquired, it requires considerable effort to _continue_ that power. The +unnumbered objects of thought which civilization constantly brings +before the mind, without giving any opportunity for a mastery of many of +them; the fierce rivalries of interest, and the enervating habits of +body which are constantly being formed or perpetuated--all alike and +together tend to break down an acquired power of Attention. It is said +that Alexander Hamilton used to go through the demonstrations of +Euclid's Geometry before the commencement of each Session of the early +Congress. For what purpose? In order to be able to make use of +geometrical knowledge in debate? Certainly not. He reviewed this study +to stiffen the back-bone of his power of Attention. And he possessed +this power in an extraordinary degree by nature. I am not suggesting any +such severe course of self-discipline. But if the pupil whose +_attention was formerly weak_ will never allow a date to come before him +without fixing it in mind by my method, and if he will also occasionally +learn by heart a passage of prose or poetry by my _assimilating_ +methods, he will train his Attention in a pleasanter and more effective +way than Hamilton did his by his studies in Euclid--besides making +himself conspicuously accurate where most men are notoriously +inaccurate. + +[It is a most misleading mistake to suppose that the principles of the +following or either of the previous chapters are to be _consciously and +constantly_ used by the pupil, whether he be a student or a man of +business. It is only used at all during the training period--rarely +afterwards. But during the training period, I desire the pupil to make +as much use of the devices and principles of the system as he possibly +can--and the more he uses them the sooner he no longer has occasion to +use them.] + + 1. Does it require any effort to _continue_ that power? + 2. What tends to break down an acquired power of attention? + 3. What suggestion is here given the pupil in regard to this? + 4. Is this method easier and less severe than Hamilton's? + 5. Is it not more effectual? + + + + +THOUGHTIVE UNIFICATIONS. + +CONNECTING THE UNCONNECTED. + + +A Congressman could not remember the name of Zachary Taylor, the twelfth +President of the United States, but he could always readily recall his +nick-name, "Rough and Ready." In this case there was no _revivable_ +connection established in his mind between the _name_ Zachary Taylor and +the idea or image of the _man_ known as Zachary Taylor--but there _was_ +a revivable connection in his mind between the name "Rough and Ready" +and the idea or image of that man. Now the thing to be done to enable +this Congressman to readily recall the name Zachary Taylor was to +_establish_ or _make a revivable connection_ between the name Zachary +Taylor and the image of him, or some characteristic of him, as it was +known to that Congressman; or to connect the well-remembered name "Rough +and Ready" to the usually forgotten name Zachary Taylor. This would be a +_device_ for helping him to revive this hitherto unrecallable name. But +another and better way to aid him would be to STRENGTHEN his REVIVING +POWER GENERALLY, so that he could readily recall the name Zachary Taylor +as well as his other previous experiences; for there is no doubt that he +had a _record_ in his mind of the name Zachary Taylor; for whenever he +failed to recall it, he _recognised_ it the moment he saw it, or it was +mentioned in his presence. This proved that he _knew_ the name but could +not _revive_ it. + + 1. What difficulty did the Congressman have in connection with Z. + Taylor? + 2. What caused it? + 3. What would have been his best aid to remember the name? + + +HOW TO HELP THE MEMORY. + +There are therefore two ways of helping the memory. (1) By a device +resorted to in each separate case to help make a more vivid First +Impression. Nearly all Memory Systems hitherto taught have only been +such Devices; of little benefit except in the cases where they have been +_actually applied_--mere temporary appliances, and many of them of +doubtful value, devoid of any strengthening power. (2) By a Method of +Memory TRAINING. This is the unique character of my System. It is used +as a device during the process of developing the latent powers of the +Memory and the Attention, but the _result of its use_ is to so +strengthen the Memory that, as a Device it is no longer required. As a +trainer my System operates in three ways. (1) It increases the general +_Impressionability_, so that all First Impressions must be more vivid +than they have ever been before. (2) It increases the general +_Revivability_, so that First Impressions are more under the control of +the will, and can be afterward recalled when desired. (3) It compels the +Intellect to stay with the senses and thereby it abolishes +mind-wandering. + + 1. Did he have a _record_ of the name in his mind? + 2. How many ways are there of helping the memory? + 3. What is the first way? + 4. The second? + 5. What is meant by Memory Training? + 6. What is the unique character of my system? + 7. What is the result of its use? + 8. In how many ways does my system operate as a Trainer? + 9. What are they? + +A one-sided view of the Memory proclaims that if vivid First Impressions +are made in all cases, that is enough. This opinion implies a limited +acquaintance with the different kind of memories. In some cases where a +person is troubled with chronic forgetfulness, a vivid First Impression +may be received, and no recollection of it will long survive. That a +vivid impression was received is proved by the fact that, shortly after +the occurrence, his memory of the details of it is possibly nearly +perfect, and yet, after the lapse of a few days, or weeks, or months, +the recollection of every trace of the occurrence has vanished. After +the total oblivion of the matter in his waking moments, he will +sometimes recall all the details of the affair in a dream. This is +demonstration irresistible that the trouble in this case lies, not in +receiving vivid First Impressions, but in the weakness of his reviving +power. In fact, some memories are much oftener weak from deficiency in +reviving power than from feebleness of first impressions. If, however, +Impressionability be increased to the highest degree in all cases, and +Revivability be strengthened to the same extent, all memories will be +good, however bad some of them may theretofore have been in any or in +all respects. + + +MODES OF ESTABLISHING CONNECTIONS. + +RECOLLECTIVE ANALYSIS is used to memorise a series of words or facts +between every pair of which the relation of In., Ex., or Con. exists. It +equally applies to a single pair of such words or facts. + +RECOLLECTIVE SYNTHESIS OR THOUGHTIVE UNIFICATION is used where _no +relation exists_. + +A _revivable_ connection is established in such cases by means of a +Correlation which always consists of one or more unifying intermediates. +And the words, hitherto un-united, which are thus cemented together, are +called Extremes. + +We had experience in learning the Series in the first chapter that the +application of the Laws of In., Ex., and Con. enable us to memorise +those Series in much less time than it would have taken had we not known +_how to make use of_ those Laws. Many people could _never_ have +committed to memory such Series by mere _rote_ or _repetition_, and not +one in a hundred could have learnt to say them backwards by _rote_ +alone. Yet my Pupils easily learn them both ways, because Analysis +affords the highest possible AID to the Natural Memory. In fact, the +_deepest_ and _most abiding_ impression that can be made upon the +Natural Memory is by impressing it with _relations_ of In., Ex., or +Con.; because these are the Memory-Senses (if the phrase be allowed), +these are the Eyes, Ears, Touch, Taste, and Smell of the Memory: and we +have only to impress the _Memory_ according to the laws of its own +nature and the _Memory_ will RETAIN the impression. This is exactly what +my Art does: for I translate every case of Synthesis into an Analytic +series by supplying one or more _Memory-intermediates_ that grow out of +the "Extremes," each one of which is an instance of In., Ex., or +Con.--Thus, every example of Synthesis is a =developed or extended +Analysis=. To make this translation from Synthesis into Analysis requires +no intellectual ingenuity--no constructive power of imagination--but +only a _recall to consciousness_, through In., Ex., or Con., of what we +already _know_ about the "Extremes." I call a specimen of developed +Analysis a Correlation, because the Intermediates sustain the _direct_, +_immediate_, and _specific_ relation of In., Ex., or Con. to the +"Extremes" (having nothing in common, in principle or nature, with the +old-fashioned Mnemonical "Links," or "Phrases"). + + 1. When is Rec. Analysis used? + 2. Rec. Synthesis? + 3. How is a revivable connection established? + 4. Have you carefully read every question at the bottom of the + previous page, and _thought out_ or written out answers to them? + 5. Since questions are valuable helps to the learner, will you + faithfully read all the questions hereafter in this lesson, and + write out or think out the answers thereto? + 6. What have the laws of In., Ex., or Con. enabled us to do? + 7. Could all people have learned them by rote? + 8. What affords the highest possible aid to the natural memory? + 9. How are the deepest and most abiding impressions made on the + Natural Memory? + 10. What are the Memory-Senses? + + +EXAMPLES OF CORRELATIONS. + +Make your own Correlation (different from mine, given below) between +each of the following seven pairs of Extremes: + +[_In._ may be represented by 1, _Ex._ by 2, and _Con._ by 3]: + + 1. ANCHOR (1) Sheet Anchor (1) Sheet (1) Bed (1) BOLSTER + ---- (3) Capstan (1) Night-cap (3) Pillow (3) ---- + ---- (3) Roadstead (1) Bedstead ---- + ---- (3) Sea Bed (1) ---- + 2. PEN (3) Ink (1) Ink-bottle (1) Smelling-bottle (3) NOSE + ---- (1) Pensive (2) Gay (1) Nosegay ---- + ---- (3) Wiper (3) ---- + 3. SLAIN (3) Battle (3) Joshua (3) MOON + ---- (1) Struck-down (1) Moon-struck (1) ---- + ---- (3) Fallen (2) Risen (3) ---- + 4. TEA (1) Teaspoon (1) Spooney (1) LOVER + ---- (3) Sugar (1) Sweet (1) Sweetheart (1) ---- + 5. ARROW (3) Tell (3) Apple (3) Cider Mill (1) TREADMILL + ---- (3) Flight (3) Arrest (3) Convict (3) ---- + 6. BEE (1) Beeswax (1) Sealing-wax (3) Title deeds (3) ATTORNEY + ---- (1) Queen Bee (1) Queen's Counsel (3) ---- + 7. LASH (1) Eye-lash (1) Glass Eye (1) Substitute (1) VICARIOUS + +Children and Adults, who have thoroughly learned Recollective Analysis +and practised its exercises, find no difficulty in making Correlations, +unless they are so afflicted with Mind-Wandering that they have never +_digested_ the impressions they have received, or unless their +intellectual operations have been twisted out of the natural order by +perversities of early education; but even in these cases the _diligent_ +student will be able--usually before these pages are finished--at once +to correlate any word whatever to any or all the words in any +dictionary. A learned Professor declared that no person unacquainted +with astronomy could correlate "Moon" to "Omnibus." He did it thus: +MOON--(3) Gibbous [one of the phases of the Moon]--(1) "Bus"--(1) +OMNIBUS. I asked a pupil then present--a girl nine years old--to connect +them. She promptly replied, "MOON--(1) Honey-moon--(3) Kissing--(1) +Buss--(1) OMNIBUS." A moment after, she gave another: "MOON--(1) Full +Moon--(1) 'Full inside'--(3) OMNIBUS." Once more: "MOON--(1) +Moonlight--(1) Lightning--(3) 'Conductor'--(3) OMNIBUS." Another pupil +imagined it would be _impossible_ to correlate the following _letters_ +of the alphabet to _words_ beginning with the same letters, as "A" to +"Anchor," "B" to "Bull," "C" to "Cab," "D" to "Doge,"--as well as +"Cooley" to "The." There are, however, no words which my Pupils cannot +soon learn to correlate together with the greatest readiness, as: + + "A" (1) First Letter (1) First Mate (3) Ship (3) "ANCHOR" + " (1) Aviary (3) Bird (3) Flew (1) Fluke (1) ---- + "B" (1) Bee (3) Sting (1) Sharp Pain (1) Sharp Horns (1) "BULL" + " (1) Below (1) Bellow (3) ---- + "C" (1) Sea (3) Ocean Steamer (1) Cabin (1) "CAB" + "D" (1) "D.D." (1) Clerical Title (1) Venetian Title (1) "DOGE" + "COOLEY" (1) Coolly Articulated (1) Definite Article (1) "THE" + + 1. What must we do in order to make the memory retain the + impression? + 2. Does my Art do this? + 3. Into what do I translate every case of Synthesis? + 4. What does it then become? + 5. What is a correlation? + 6. Are correlations difficult to make? + +All possible cases to be memorised can be reduced to (1) ISOLATED FACTS, +where each fact is correlated to some fact in its surroundings through +which you must think as the _Best Known_, in order to recall it--many +instances will be given in this lesson:--or, (2) SERIAL FACTS, which +must be remembered in the _exact order_ in which they were presented to +the mind--illustrated by many examples in this Lesson. + +NEVER FORGET that this System serves two distinct purposes: (1) That it +is a Device for memorising any Isolated Fact or Serial Facts by means of +mere Analysis, otherwise called Instantaneous Assimilation or memorised +Correlations, as well as by other means. (2) And that by memorising and +repeating for a considerable period Analytic Series, and especially by +_making_ and _memorising_ one's own Correlations, it is an unequalled +system of Memory-TRAINING. Let the ambitious Pupil =learn as many +examples as I give in the lessons in order to so strengthen his natural +memory that he will no longer have to use the _device_ for memorising, +his natural memory permanently retaining all he desires to remember=. +This result comes only to those who carry out ALL the directions with +genuine alacrity--not shirking one of them. + + 1. Do all persons find them easy? + 2. What persons do not? + 3. Can such persons become expert in making them? + 4. How? + 5. Make an original correlation of your own between these extremes. + 6. To what may all possible cases to be remembered be reduced? + 7. What are Isolated facts? + 8. What two distinct purposes does my system serve? + + +ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS COMPARED. + +It is sometimes asked, cannot "Analysis" cement together unconnected +"Extremes"? This question implies a contradiction of terms. I reply, +"Yes, by _accident_, and by accident only." + +Analysis is _declaratory_--Synthesis is _constructive_. Analysis +_discovers_ and _describes_ the relations actually existing--Synthesis +applies connecting intermediates where no relations previously existed, +and then Analysis characterizes the relations introduced by the +cementing intermediates. + +Even in the First Exercises the Series are Synthetic. Every pair of +words of which such Series consists exemplifies the relations either of +Inclusion, Exclusion, or Concurrence. I used to call that Lesson +Recollective Analysis, because in it the pupil is engaged in +familiarising himself with those Laws of Assimilation, and in +_discovering_ and _declaring_ the character of the relations between the +words of such Synthetic Series. He commits to memory such a series by +_thinking_ of the relations between the words. A minor object is to +memorise the Series--but a greater and higher object never lost sight of +in these Lessons is to train the Memory and Attention. And let the pupil +clearly notice _how_ this training comes about. Merely running over a +Series--two words at a time--without discriminating the _kind_ and +_quality_ of the relations between the words--hoping that the mind +unpractised in the Laws of Assimilation will intuitively feel those +relations, constitutes no training of the Memory. Such reading neither +strengthens the old power nor develops any new power. It is a blind act +of unconscious absorption, however little be absorbed. But if the mind +_acts_ in such cases and _tries to find_ and _characterise_ the +relations, then the appreciation of the relations of In., Ex., and Con., +is quickened and invigorated and becomes in time so intensified that +those relations are thereafter almost automatically felt, and the +impression they make on the Memory, henceforth, is the most vivid +possible. + + 1. To whom only does this result come? + 2. What question is frequently asked? + 3. What is the reply? + 4. Is analysis declaratory? + 5. If so, why? + 6. Is Synthesis constructive? + 7. If so, explain why? + 8. Why is the first lesson called Rec. Analysis? + +Every Correlation is a Synthetic Series. It can be and should _always_ +be analyzed, but Analysis never makes a Correlation. That is the +function of Synthesis. Since "extremes" are words with no relation +between them, Analysis cannot find what does not exist. But _accident_ +sometimes makes a _spelling_ or _letter_ relation between the +"Extremes," and then Analysis can memorise these "extremes" by means of +such accidental relations. To illustrate:-- + +A physician was troubled to remember on which side of the heart are the +"mitral valves." As they are on the left side of the heart, he might +have noticed that "mitral" ends with the letter "l," and that the word +"left" begins with the letter "l"--as "l" belongs to both of these +words, here would be a case of analysis. Such a device, however, could +never be erected into a rule, for it is founded on accident only, and +cannot be used in all cases. How much more vivid to many persons in this +example is a Correlation, thus: "_Mitral valves_ ... mitred Abbots ... +none left ... _left_." + +To remember which of the University crews wears _dark_ blue and which +_light_, we can note that the vowel "I" belongs alike to Cambridge and +"Light" and is absent from Oxford and "Dark." + +Take a case in Trigonometry--a _Complement_ is what remains after +subtracting an angle from _one_ right-angle. Take 60 degrees from +90 degrees, and we have the complement 30 degrees--a _Supplement_ is +what remains after subtracting an angle from two right-angles. Take +120 degrees from 180 degrees and we have the supplement 60 degrees. How +to remember that "Complement" relates to one right-angle, and +"Supplement" relates to two right-angles, is a difficulty for a poor +memory. Looking at the accidents of the subject, we see that Supplement +and two right-angles have a relation in this, that Supplement begins +with S and two begins with _T_. S ... T. Hence we must remember that +Supplement relates to _T_wo right-angles, and, of course, the word +Complement to one right-angle. + +Or to use the Synthetic Method: "_Complement_ (compliment) ... praise +bestowed ... prize-winner ... won ... _one right-angle_" (_Complement_ +completes right-angle ... _one_ ... _right-angle_) or "_Supplement_ ... +supple ... bend double ... 'two double' ... _two right-angles_" +(_Supplement_ ... added to ... more than one right-angle ... _two +right-angles_). + +I could give many other illustrations of the narrow scope of this Method +of Accidents, though _genuine within that scope_, and how, in _all_ +cases, by the Synthetic Method we can find in the facts _to be +remembered_ the means of their recollection. One case more: In regard to +memorising the statement that "the Posterior Nerve of the Spinal Column +is Sensory, and the Anterior Nerve is Motor," using this Method of +Accidents, "You observe that Posterior and Sensory go together, and that +Anterior and Motor go together. The initial letters of Posterior and +Sensory are P and S, and the initial letters of Anterior and Motor are A +and M. By considering that A and M are in the upper part of the Alphabet +and P and S are in the lower part of it, you will be sure to remember +that Anterior is associated with Motor and Posterior with Sensory." I +admit that the _first time_ one hears this elaborate method applied the +novelty of the principle of it might make an impression; but, after +that, the method would probably fail from its lengthy exposition; +because it is difficult to retain the _steps of an argument_ in a weak +Memory and therefore such a method cannot certainly act as a _Means for +Aiding_ the Memory. How do I manage this case? By correlating Posterior +to Sensory, thus: _Posterior_ ... Post-Mortem ... Insensible ... +_Sensory_; or Anterior to Motor, thus: _Anterior_ ... Ant ... disturbed +anthill ... commotion ... _Motor_; or _Anterior_ ... antediluvian ... +rush of water ... water-power ... _Motor_. In uniting the two +unconnected "Extremes" together by means of a _developed Analysis +memorised_, the Natural Memory is aided in a very high degree. + + 1. What is every correlation? + 2. Does Analysis ever make a correlation? + 3. Why would not "A" make a good In. by sound with "Anchor" on + preceding page? + 4. Is the method of remembering by accidental coincidences always + reliable? + 5. If not, why? + 6. Are there cases where it cannot be used? + 7. Make an original correlation between "Mitral valves" and "left." + 8. How does the accidental coincidence in connection with the + University crews compare with Synthesis? + 9. Does this method make an impression on the novice at first? + 10. Does the novice adhere to it? + 11. Why? + +BY MEMORISING a Correlation, you so unite the two EXTREMES in memory, +that you need not afterwards _recall the intermediates_. The +intermediates drop out of the memory by what Prof. E. W. Scripture, +Psychologist, of Yale University, calls the Law of Obliteration. + + 1. Why does the method fail? + 2. Is it difficult to retain the steps of an argument in the + natural memory? + 3. Can you give any instances in your own experience where Analysis + has helped you to cement Extremes together? + 4. Can such a method act as a means for aiding the memory? + 5. How would I manage the case spoken of? + + +HOW TO MEMORISE A CORRELATION. + +To memorise a Correlation you must _at first_, if your _Natural Memory +be weak_, repeat from _memory_ the intermediates forwards and backwards, +as:--ANCHOR ... _sheet-anchor_ ... _sheet_ ... _bed_ ... +BOLSTER--BOLSTER ... _bed_ ... _sheet_ ... _sheet-anchor_ ... ANCHOR, at +least three times each way. These six repetitions from memory, three +forward and three back, are only required _at first_. In a short time +you will infallibly remember every Correlation _you make_; at last, the +memory will become so strong, that you will no longer have to make +Correlations at all. After you have repeated the Correlation, then +repeat the two extremes, thus--"Anchor" ... "Bolster." "Bolster" ... +"Anchor." "Bolster" ... "Anchor." "Anchor" ... "Bolster." + +Nothing else is so easy to memorise as a Correlation, for a Correlation +is not a "mental picture" or "story"--it is neither a proposition, +sentence or phrase. It has no rhetorical, grammatical, argumentative or +_imaginative_ character. It is simply an elemental primordial +Psychological Sequence of Ideas in which one includes another, excludes +another, or in which one idea has been so often or so vividly united +with another in past experience that the two are inseparably connected +in memory--and a little practice in making and _memorising_ these +Correlations soon makes it _impossible_ to forget them. + + 1. What is the result of uniting two unconnected "Extremes" by + means of a developed Analysis? + 2. What are the first steps in memorising a correlation? + 3. How long are these repetitions required? + 4. What will be the result in a short time? + 5. What will be the final result? + 6. Are correlations easy to remember? + 7. What is the result of making and memorising them? + 8. When does the most vivid concurrence take place? + + +ASSIMILATIVE ASSOCIATION AND MEMORY. + +Probably no psychological mistake was ever fraught with greater injury +to the cause of public or self-education than the too prevalent opinion +amongst teachers generally that "physiological retentiveness" is the +memory's sole reliance _in all stages of life_. It is nearly the sole +reliance in infancy, and a partial reliance in youth. But when an +accumulation of experiences and a fair command of language have been +gained, new acquisitions are henceforward principally made by _the +affiliation_ of one idea upon or with another or _the making of +associations between ideas already established_. + +And, if this be so, then memory must be very greatly improvable, since +no mental power is susceptible of so much improvement as assimilative +association. + +A good memory, whether natural or acquired, belongs to quick and vivid +_associability_ and _revivability_ rather than to mere inherent and +perpetual physiological _record making_. + +After a certain number of experiences the child learns the appearance of +a square. All his future experiences, however varied, of squares become +affiliated upon, or connected with the record of this original square. +If each new square had to be separately impressed on the brain as a +distinct and independent physiological record, it would take as much +time and trouble to learn every new square as it did to learn the first +square. But the _instant_ recognition of every square after learning the +first one shows that the old brain record is used in the case of each +new experience of squares or that the new square is interpreted by the +old or original record through the Laws of Association. Again: Taking +the prefixes _com._, _de._, _im._, _op._, _re._, _sup._, &c., which are +used in thousands of cases, and the suffixes _ment_, _sion_, _ible_, +_ibility_, &c., also used in thousands of words, and using these in +connexion with the root word "Press" we have compress, depress, impress, +oppress, repress, suppress, and also compressible, depression, +re-impress, suppression, impressment, &c. + +Must a new physiological record be made for each form of the sixty or +more words of which Press constitutes the base, and must a new record be +also made for each of the prefixes and suffixes in the thousands of +combinations in which they occur? No one believes any such absurdity. + +If space permitted it would be easy to offer additional considerations +tending to show that after infancy and early youth new acquisitions are +mainly made by combinations and recombinations of ideas already +possessed, and not by new and independent records physiologically +reimpressed on each occasion. + + +RULES FOR MAKING CORRELATIONS. + +1. Never make a correlation except in conformity to In., Ex., and Con. +Carelessness here is fatal to success. + +2. When the pupil reads a correlation of mine, he should indicate the +relations between the words by writing in the figures 1, 2, or 3, and he +should pursue the same course with his own correlations. + +3. Ofttimes "extremes" are in different planes of thought, so +occasionally three intermediates are necessary to cement them; two are +often required; but after considerable practice in making correlations +one usually suffices. + + 1. What is fatal to success in making correlations? + 2. What do the figures 1, 2, and 3 indicate in Rule 2? + 3. How many intermediates should there be? + +4. A correlation is a _successive advance_, and an intermediate must not +refer back to any except its _immediate_ antecedent, never to its second +or third antecedent. A pupil wrote:--_Short steps_ ... stepson ... real +son ... more a son ... _Morrison_. Here, "more a son" refers to the +comparison between "real son" and "stepson," but the latter is the +second antecedent so the correlation is a defective one. He might have +said: _Short steps_ ... _stepson_ ... _Morrison_. + +5. A word may be used twice but never three times. _Pen_ ... pensive ... +gay ... nosegay ... _Nose_. Here "gay" is properly used twice, and after +that, it is dropped and you can go on with the rest of the word, to wit, +_nose_. + +6. A compound phrase including a verb is rarely allowable, since the +intermediates must be the simplest elements, either sensations or +perceptions [relations among sensations] or abstractions [relations +among relations], or one of these with either of the others, always +exemplifying either In., Ex., or Con. + +7. My correlations are good for me, but they may not be so vivid to +others, especially where the concurrences are used. To fix the date of +Magna Charta (1215), the pupil could memorise this Correlation--MAGNA +CHARTA ... King John ... Jew's teeth ... DENTAL. But if the pupil did +not know _before_ that King John had granted that charter, and if he did +not also know the story about the extraction of the Jew's teeth to make +him pay the royal exaction, there would be no concurrence as to the +first word and second, or second and third, and if he learned the +Correlation it would be by mere repetition without aid from Analysis. In +such a case he would make and memorise his own Correlation, perhaps +thus: MAGNA CHARTA ... magnify ... diminish ... DWINDLE. When a pupil +makes his own Correlations, every concurrence he uses is a _real_ +concurrence to him, and so with his Ins. and Exs. This is a decisive +reason why the Pupil should merely look upon my Correlations as models, +but make and memorise his _own_ Correlations in all cases, as being more +vivid to _him_ and, therefore, more certainly remembered, as well as +more effectively strengthening the Memory in both its Stages. + +8. Vivid Ins. by _meaning_ are better than Ins. by S. (the latter when +used, should be as perfect as possible). EAR ... EEL makes a weak In. by +S. to some persons, but it would make a much more vivid first impression +to most persons to deal with them in this way: EAR ... (w)ring ... twist +... wriggle ... EEL. But "Bivou_ac_ ... _aq_ueduct" is a perfect In. by +S. as to the last syllable of the former and the first syllable of the +latter, since those syllables are pronounced exactly alike. We may +connect Bivouac to Rain thus: "_Bivouac_ ... aqueduct ... flowing water +... falling water ... RAIN." + +9. _Never_--in the early stages of the study of the System--make a +_second_ Correlation until you have _memorised the first_. + +10. Although _making_ and _memorising_ Correlations serves the useful +purpose of fixing specific facts in the memory, yet the MAIN OBJECT in +making and memorising Correlations is to develop the latent power of the +Natural Memory to such a degree that all facts are hereafter remembered +without the aid of conscious Correlations. + +11. Never try to find _analytic_ date or number words until you _know +the material facts connected with the date or number_ before you. The +student wishes to fix the date of Voltaire's birth, in 1694. "The +Shaper" and "The Giber" occur to him. If he is ignorant of the facts of +Voltaire's life, he will correlate thus: "_Vol_taire ... (1) ... +volatile ... (2) ... 'fixed' ... (1) ... 'The Shaper' {Th}e {Sh}a{p}e{r} +(1694);" or "Vol_taire_ ... (1) ... tear to pieces ... (1) ... mocking +dissector ... (1) ... {Th}e {G}i{b}e{r} (1694)." If he had known that +Voltaire was a born writer, he would have found the analytic relation in +"Voltaire ... {Th}e {Sh}a{p}e{r} (1694)" or if he had known that he was a +terrible mocker, he would have said: "Voltaire ... {Th}e {G}i{b}e{r} +(1694)." If he wished to fix the date of the discovery of America, he +might think of "{T}e{r}ra{p}i{n}" (a large tide-water turtle, abounding +in Maryland), and correlate thus: "Discovery of America ... (1) ... +Maryland ... (3) ... {T}e{r}ra{p}i{n} (1492)." But if he remembers that +Con. covers all cases of Cause and Effect, Instrument or Means to End, +Person by whom, &c., and if he reflects that this discovery has been a +blessing to the Old as well as the New World, he would say: "Discovery +of America ... (3) {T}{r}ue {B}oo{n} (1492)." Or, if he considers that the +moment America was made known to Europe the whole of the Western +Continent was open to every new-comer, he would find analytic date-words +thus: "Discovery of America ... (3) ... {D}oo{r} o{p}e{n} (1492)." If he +merely wants to fix the fraction 92, he could use the first two +consonants of the name of one of his ships, and say: "Discovery of +America ... {P}i{n}ta (1492)." + + +ISOLATED FACTS. + +Correlate an _Isolated Fact_ to something (to some fact in its +environment or _entourage_ that is BEST KNOWN and) which you are sure to +THINK OF when you wish to recall the Isolated Fact. + + +HOW TO REMEMBER PROPER NAMES WHEN INTRODUCED. + +An infallible method of remembering proper names is (1) Get the name +when introduced. If not quite sure, ask for it. (2) _Pronounce_ the +_name aloud_ whilst _looking at_ the person. Do this several times, if +possible. The object is to produce a concurrence or connection between +the _sight-image of the Person_ and a _sound-image of his Name_. (3) To +help the ear for sound, always pronounce everyone's name aloud whenever +you meet him. This helps nature. These directions carried out never fail +to make a pupil perfect in remembering proper names. + +To remember PROPER NAMES in the absence of the person, correlate the +Person's Name to the name of some Peculiarity of the Person (as the BEST +KNOWN and) which you are sure to THINK of whenever you think of the +Person. If you _memorise_ the Correlation, you will recall the Name +whenever you think of this Peculiarity (whatever struck you about him). + +To remember a proper name, Mnemonists resort to In., by S. But this +_alone_ gives no starting point, no "Best Known" which you are certain +to think of, and which will enable you to recall the name, _provided_ +you cement by a memorised Correlation the "Best Known" to the name +itself; in fact, a similarity of sound _alone_ and _by itself_ is likely +to mislead you into reviving itself instead of the name. A celebrated +Member of Parliament (who in the days of his youth, before he had +greatly tested Mnemonics, gave a high opinion of its value) was to +deliver an address at the Birkbeck Institution, some years ago. Having +difficulty in remembering proper names, he thought he would _fix_ the +name of its founder in his memory by the Mnemonical device of finding a +word that sounded like it; he said to himself, "It reminds me of +'Pinchbeck.'" He commenced as follows: "Before coming to the subject on +which I am to speak this evening, I desire to pay a deserved tribute of +praise to the founder of this great Institution, the celebrated Mr. +PINCHBECK." A shout of laughter revealed to him that Mnemonics may get +us into trouble, and fail to help us out: he could not remember the real +name, Birkbeck, until it was told him. If he had mastered this System, +his NEW memory-power would have enabled him to remember the true name +_without any device_; or, if he was but a beginner at my System he could +have remembered the name Birkbeck--which he was afraid he would +forget--by correlating it to the word--"Founder," which he did remember, +thus:--FOUNDER ... lost way ... hark-back ... Birkbeck; or, FOUNDER ... +foundered horse ... chestnut horse ... chestnut ... bur ... BIRKBECK. If +he had memorised either of these Correlations, or one of his own, by +repeating the intermediates forwards and backwards two or three times, +and then recalled the two extremes, "Founder," "Birkbeck," several +times, the moment he thought of Founder, he would instantly have +recalled Birkbeck, one extreme recalling the other without the +intermediates being recalled. When one has received only a third of the +benefit of this System as a Memory-TRAINER, the mere _making_ of a +Correlation ensures remembering two extremes together without thinking +of intermediates. + + 1. To what must we correlate a person's name? + 2. What will be the result if we memorise the correlation? + 3. To what do Mnemonists resort to remember proper names? + 4. Does this _alone_ give a starting point? + 5. What is a similarity of sound alone likely to do? + +[Dr. Johnson, when introduced to a stranger repeated his name several +times aloud and sometimes _spelled_ it. This produced a vivid first +impression of the man's _name_; but it did not _connect_ the name to the +man who bore it. People who have adopted the Johnsonian Method +sometimes remember the name but apply it to the wrong person, because +they did not establish any relation between the name and the man to whom +it belonged.] + + +EXERCISES IN CORRELATING. + +Make 20 of your own Correlations between faces and names (or between +words and meanings), using some of the extremes given by me, and, as +other extremes (words, &c., of your own selection, or) names and faces +of your own acquaintances. + + _Peculiarity._ _Correlation._ _Proper Names._ + + Cross-eyed Cross-bow ... bowman Mr. Archer + Wavy hair dancing wave ... Morris dance Mr. Morrison + Black eyes white ... snow ... pure as snow Mr. Virtue + Retreating chin retiring ... home-bird Mr. Holmes + High instep high boots ... mud ... peat Mr. Peat + Crooked legs broken legs ... crushed Mr. Crushton + Apprehension suspension ... gallows Mr. Galloway + Sombre sad ... mourning ... hat-band Mr. Hatton + Music stave ... bar Mr. Barcroft + Violinist violin ... high note ... whistle Mr. Birtwistle + Painter paint ... colored cards ... whist Mr. Hoyle + Plumber plum-pudding ... victuals Mr. Whittles + Joiner wood ... ash Mr. Ashworth + + 1. Is it ever possible to remember two extremes without thinking of + the intermediates? + 2. In what cases? + 3. What did Dr. Johnson sometimes do when introduced to a stranger? + 4. What sometimes occurs with people who have adopted the + Johnsonian Method? + 5. Why is this? + 6. As Max Mueller names mental acts in this order: Sensation, + Perception, Conception, Naming, and Memory, would he hold that + failure to remember names implies weakness of naming power? No! + Remembering a name is an act wholly unlike imposing a name in + the first instance. Such failure arises from weakness of the + auditory function, or of the perception of individual + peculiarities or failure of the sight-image to become cemented + to the sound image. + +=A CONTRAST.=--When unconnected ideas have to be united in the memory so +that hereafter one will recall the other, the teachers of other Memory +Systems say: "What can I invent to tie them together--what story can I +contrive--what foreign extraneous matter can I introduce--what mental +picture can I imagine, no matter how unnatural or false the +juxtaposition may be, or what argument or comparison can I originate--no +matter how far-fetched and fanciful it may be, to help hold these +'Extremes' together?" They do not reflect that all these mnemonical +outside and imported schemes must _also_ be remembered, and that being +in the form of sentences expressing loose relation of mere physical +juxtapositions or the complex relations invented by constructive +imagination or subtle intellect, they are, to most, more difficult to +recollect than the extremes would be without these ponderous aids. +Hence, in their professed attempt to aid the memory, they really impose +a _new_ and _additional burden_ upon it. + + 1. Are you required to make any original correlations? + 2. How many? + 3. Between what extremes? + 4. Do you find it difficult? + 5. Have you any evidence given here that others have experienced + any difficulty in making them? + 6. Did they finally succeed? + 7. What question is frequently asked by other memory teachers? + +On the other hand, I simply ask the memory what it _already knows_ about +the "Extremes." The first intermediate of a correlation is _directly_ +connected through In., Ex., or Con., with the first "Extreme," and the +last intermediate with the last "Extreme," and the intervening +intermediate (if there be one) with the other two, and thus, the +_intermediates being already in the memory_, and not the result of +invention or ingenuity, my Method of Correlation is purely and solely a +MEMORY process. In this way, I use the MEMORY TO HELP THE MEMORY, I use +the _reviving_ power of the memory to make a vivid FIRST IMPRESSION +between two hitherto unconnected "Extremes." I add nothing to the +"Extremes," import nothing from abroad in regard to them, invent +nothing. I simply _arouse_, _re-waken_ to consciousness, _what is +already stored away_ in the memory in regard to those "Extremes," and, +by reciting the Correlation a few times forwards and backwards, cement +the "Extremes" themselves so vividly together, that henceforth one +"Extreme" revives the other "Extreme" without the recall of the +intermediates. + +And in the chapter on Recollective Analysis, and also in the previous +part of this chapter, I have given the attentive student such a +familiarity with the Memory Laws of In., Ex., and Con., that he can make +Correlations as easily as he breathes. + +When learning prose or poetry by means of endless repetitions to +acquire, and endless views to retain, the mind soon wanders, and thus +discontinuity is promoted; but, in reciting a Correlation forwards _and +backwards_ from memory, the mind cannot wander, and thus the continuity +is greatly strengthened. Again, memory is improved by exercise, and +_improved in the highest degree_ by _making_ and _memorising_ +correlations, because in _making_ them the _reviving_ power of the +memory is exercised in conformity to Memory's own laws; and in +_memorising_ the Correlations both stages of memory are most vividly +impressed. Thus, making and memorising the Correlations TRAINS both +Memory and Continuity. And if to this training process there be added +the habit of Assimilation which the use of the Analytic-Synthetic and +Interrogative Analysis Methods of learning Prose and Poetry by heart +imparts, as well as my other training methods, then the NEW memory thus +acquired _will not demand the further use of the System any more than +the adult swimmer will need the plank by which as a boy he learned to +swim_. + + 1. What new burden do they impose on the memory? + 2. What do I require from my pupils? + 3. To what is the first intermediate connected? + 4. Through what? + 5. How do I deal with the other intermediates? + 6. What is a memory process? + 7. Is the memory used to help the memory in any way? + 8. Do I add anything to the extremes? + 9. Is memory improved by exercise? + 10. When is the System laid aside? + + +LEARNING FOREIGN WORDS. + +"The Guide to Memory, or a New and Complete Treatise of Analogy between +the French and English Languages," compiled by Charles Turrell, +Professor of Languages, and published in 1828, contains the words which +are the _same_ in each language (alphabet, banquet, couplet, &c.), and +those almost the same--"Letters necessary in English, and superfluous in +French, are included in a parenthesis, thus Bag(g)age. Letters necessary +in French, and superfluous in English are printed in Italics, thus +Hom_m_age." At first sight it seems as if this plan were a good one (and +some still recommend it[H]). But of the words which are the same in both +languages, some of them have meanings one rarely if ever needs to +express, while others are seldom seen except in Dictionaries, so the +student who uses this method does not make much _useful_ progress. The +Rev. W. Healy, of Johnstown (Kilkenny), long before he had finished my +course of lessons, stated: "_I wrote out the French words that +correspond to the English of everything around us and that are in common +use, and found that by the aid of Rec. Syn. I could commit them much +faster than the time taken to write them out._" + +[H] The "New Memory-Aiding French Vocabulary" by Albert Tondu, published +by Hachett et Cie, London, in 1881, is a somewhat similar work to +Charles Turrell's. + +The words he had made himself familiar with were those most frequently +met with in reading, and useful in speaking and writing. + +Mr. D. Nasmith employed a clerk in finding the number of occurrences of +the same word in three books. Some words occurred thousands of times, +and others only five, or fewer. The words which frequently occurred he +arranged in order, the commonest first, and compiled exercises to suit +them. His "Linguists" (German and French) are published by Mr. D. Nutt, +of 270, Strand, London, and by the aid of them, and of my System, a +useful knowledge of German (or French) can be rapidly acquired. + +A pupil who had a very slight acquaintance with French learned an +Analytic Series of French words, asking a French friend the meaning and +pronunciation of the words unfamiliar to him. By doing this he in about +an hour learned the spelling, pronunciation, and meaning of nearly 100 +French words. Since then he has been extending the exercise, and in that +way he has learned 1,000 French words. In doing so he is strengthening +his memory by exercising it in accordance with its own laws, increasing +the control his will has over his attention, and extending his French +vocabulary. + + 1. Do we ever see words spelt differently but with the same + pronunciation? + 2. Is the use of the Dictionary required? + 3. What examples have we here of the benefits derived from + Rec.-Synthesis? + 4. With what words did he make himself familiar? + 5. Does the same word frequently occur in a book? + 6. What proof can you mention? + 7. What task was accomplished in about one hour by one of my + pupils? + 8. What language was he studying? + +To remember Unfamiliar English Words or FOREIGN WORDS, correlate the +Definition as the BEST KNOWN to the Unfamiliar or Foreign Word, and +memorise the Correlation. In the case of Foreign Words, the last +Intermediate is necessarily a case of Inclusion by sound. Sometimes +there is In. by sight or by sound between a part or the whole of the +English word, and a part or the whole of its Foreign equivalent, as +_Ap_ple--_ap_fel [German]. Of course, the pupil will not need the aid of +a correlation in such cases if he notice the analytic relation. The +French word _Anachorete_ might have for its equivalent by sound either +"_Anna_," or "_Core_," or "_Ate_," or "_Anna goes late_," or "_Ann a +core ate_," or "_Anna's cold hate_," and perhaps to some of my readers +it would seem like something else. _Cravache_ might sound like "_Crack +of lash_." Pupils often disagree as to what is good Inclusion by sound; +let each use what suits himself, and not trouble about other people's +ears. _In. by sound, or by sense, or by spelling_, is sufficient even if +it refers to _only one syllable_. + + ENGLISH. INTERMEDIATES. GREEK. + Merchant ... market ... emporium ... emporos + Move ... move on ... next stage ... next-of-kin ... kineo + True ... naked truth ... pith of the matter ... pithy ... pithanos + Course ... coarse hair ... camel hair ... dromedary ... dromos + Servant ... light fare ... dole out + [maid ... bride ... dowry] ... doulos + Tanner ... leather ... leather purse ... disburse ... burseus + Cup ... tea-cup ... tea-pot ... poterion + Fetters ... criminal ... desperate ... desmos + Fragile ... thin ... rapier ... "thrust us" ... thraustos + ---- glass houses ... "throw stones" ---- + Fruit ... fruit-knife ... fish-knife ... carp ... karpos + Round ... fat ... stout ... strong ... strongylos + Bride ... fair ... fairy ... forest nymph ... nymphe + Pearl ... Necklace ... sweetheart ... Sweet Margery ... margarites + Bread ... baker ... baker's art ... artos + Marry ... lottery of life ... risky game ... gameo + Join ... engaged--[suited ... apt] ... apt to disagree ...apto + Culprit ... cull ... select a few ... few gone ... pheugon + Milk ... milky way ... galaxy ... gala + Drink ... water ... small leak ... pinhole ... pino + Suffer + hunger ... ng of hunger ... pining away ... peinao + Time ... watch ... chronometer ... chronos + ---- Father Time ... old age ... old crony ---- + Deliver ... capture ... lasso ... apalasso + Spread ... Christmas feast ... deck a church ... + dye a spire ... diaspeiro + Uncover ... bare ... bare foot ... a Kaliph's toe ... ekkalypto + Shut ... shut out ... severe weather ... bad climate ... kleio + I judge ... condemn ... refute ... refuse ... cry "no" ... krino + Found ... establish ... fix ... fasten thus ... tie so ... ktizo + Soldier ... art of war ... strategy ... stratiotes + + 1. In the case of Foreign words, what must the last intermediate + necessarily be a case of? + 2. Do pupils always agree on a good In. by S.? + 3. What is sufficient, if it refers to one syllable only? + 4. What are you never to do in getting at an English word? + 5. What may you do in getting at a Foreign word? + 6. Could you not omit "camel hair"? + 7. Could you not omit "leather," which follows "tanner"? + 8. Could you not omit after "cup" the word "tea-cup"? + 9. Is not "tea-pot" connected by Con. with "cup"? + 10. After "bread" could you not omit "baker"? + 11. Are not "bread" and "baker's art" connected? + 12. Could you not omit "watch," after "Time"? + + ENGLISH. INTERMEDIATES. LATIN. + Heart ... heart-sick ... fainting ... cordial ... cor + Wickedness ... dishonesty ... blackmail ... malum + Book ... printed thoughts ... freedom of thought ... + liberty ... liber + ---- ... books ... library ... ---- + Breast ... front ... front view ... aspect ... pectus + Spear ... thrust ... quick motion ... hasty ... hasta + Suitor ... princely suitor ... married by proxy ... procus + Ask ... borrow ... swindle ... rogue ... rogare + Marrow ... Old English arrow ... victory ... medal ... medulla + Captain ... head of hundred ... century ... centurio + Surveyor ... measure ... dimension ... agrimensor + Furniture ... bent-wood chairs ... bent legs ... supple + legs ... supellex + Vine ... wine ... luxury ... pampered ... pampinus + Liar ... false pretence ... mendicant ... mendax + Cow ... cow-pox ... vaccination ... vacca + Sing ... boatman's song ... canoe ... cano + Kill ... kill by hanging ... broken neck ... necare + Redden ... blush ... kissing ... ruby lips ... rubesco + ---- red ... ruby ... ---- + Dry ... dry mouth ... feverish ... sick ... siccus + Man ... married man ... home ... homo + War ... victory ... rejoicings ... bells rung ... bellum + Rob ... robber ... hue-and-cry ... policeman's rap ... rapto + Tanner ... russet leather ... russet apple ... apple + core ... coriarius + Dove ... married love ... United States ... Columbia ... columba + Bench ... table ... shop counter ... selling ... subsellium + Oar ... Roman galley ... Rome ... Romulus and Remus ... Remus + Garret ... unhealthy ... medicine ... salts and senna ... cenaculum + Garret ... store-room ... grain store ... granaria + Horse ... race ... dead heat ... equal ... equus + Cock ... spurring ... goading ... galling ... gallus + Lazy ... tramp ... knave ... ignavus + Make heavy ... rich food ... gravy ... gravo + Sign ... musical signs ... notes ... nota + Poverty ... drafty garret ... sleeping draught ... + opium ... inopia + Messenger ... news ... false news ... nonsense ... nuntius + Top ... high perch ... hen's perch ... cackle ... cacumen + Face ... bare face ... bare headed bird ... vulture ... vultus + Useless ... needless impatience ... irritation ... irritus + Dark ... dark staircase ... insecure ... obscurus + Writer ... bad writer ... scribbler ... scriba + Harvest ... harvest home ... "Mrs. at home?" ... messis + Dog ... dog's tail ... tin can ... + [cane carrier ... cane[I]] ... canis + Egg ... boiled egg ... boiled hard ... over boiled ... ovum + Fox ... jackall ... carcass ... vulture ... vulpes + Bread ... sweat of brow ... labour ... pain ... + [bread-pan ... pan[I]] ... panis + Table ... figures ... calculation ... mensuration ... mensa + Master ... schoolboard ... fines ... magistrate ... magister + Tree ... mast ... ship ... harbour ... arbor + Mother ... wife ... helpmeet ... help-mate ... mater + +[I] In some English schools the first syllable in "panis" sounds "pan," +in others "pain." If an English word derived from a foreign word (or +from the same root) occurs to you, use it; but do not spend time hunting +for derivations. Unfamiliar words are no help; do not think the word +"panification" will help you to "panis," because it is an English word +meaning "bread-making," and you are an Englishman. You would be much +wiser to try to remember the English "panification" by the aid of the +Latin "panis," than _vice-versa_, that is, if any mortal ever does want +to remember that pedantic dictionary word. + + 1. If "mendicants" are known to be liars, why could not "false + pretences" be omitted? + 2. If "vaccination" means inoculating with "cowpox," why could not + "cowpox" be omitted? + 3. If "broken" neck means a violent death, why not omit "kill by + hanging"? + 4. Ought not "billing and cooing" to be inserted after "Dove"? + 5. What relation is there between "married love" and "United + States"? + 6. If "musical" be added to "notes," why could not "musical signs" + be omitted? + 7. If "scribbler" is a writer, why could not "bad writer" be + omitted? + + ENGLISH. INTERMEDIATES. GERMAN. + Joy ... play-day ... free day ... Friday ... Freude + Sad ... tomb ... mason ... trowel ... traurig + Clear ... clear tones ... clarionet ... klar + Indolent ... "lazy bones" ... lazy lass ... laessig + Dangerous ... storm ... steamboat fare ... gefaehrlich + Part ... part of house ... roof ... tile ... Theil + Empty ... hollow ... fox's hole ... lair ... leer + Take ... take husband ... new name ... nehmen + Diffidence ... shy girl ... schoolgirl ... Miss ... Misstrauen + Little ... grow less ... on the wane ... wenig + Much ... more ... mourn ... feel grief ... viel + Recompense ... repayment ... loan ... Lohn + Question ... answer ... fragmentary answer ... Frage + Foot-stool ... low ... shame ... Schemel + Pressure ... too heavy ... droop ... Druck + Voice ... voice lozenges ... stimulation ... Stimme + Child ... young kindred ... Kind + Threaten ... stinging words ... stinging bee ... drone ... drohen + Mirror ... reflect ... think ... speak ... Spiegel + Beetroot ... red heart ... rib ... Ruebe + Potato ... dig up ... remove ... cart off ... Kartoffel + Love ... lovers' meeting ... meat ... + Liebig's extract ... Liebe + Campaign ... pain ... feel ... felt ... Feldzug + Medicine ... science ... arts ... (_pr._ artsnei) Arznei + Evening ... hour of prayer ... bend the knee ... Abend + Heaven ... angels ... harps ... hymns ... Himmel + Song ... choir ... choir leader ... lead ... Lied + Table ... soiled table cloth ... dirtyish ... Tisch + ---- ... dinner ... dish ... ---- + Chair ... chairman ... session ... Sessel + Bottle ... Leyden jar ... electric spark ... flash ... Flasche + Beloved ... attached ... hooked ... trout ... traut + + 1. Could not "boiled hard" be omitted? + 2. If we use "mensuration tables," could not "figures ... + calculation" be spared? + 3. What is the relation between "Tree" and "mast"? + 4. Could not "lazy bones" be omitted after "indolent"? + 5. Why could not "schoolgirl" be omitted? + 6. Why could not "answer" be omitted after "question"? + + ENGLISH. INTERMEDIATES. FRENCH. + Fat ... Fat ox ... clover ... rich grass ... gras + Mouth ... Flesh eater ... butcher ... bouche + Asphalt ... assafoetida ... fish bait ... beton + To lash ... circus ... Hengler ... cingler + Current ... nerve current ... vague function ... vagus + Armchair ... reclining ... gouty ... foot oil ... fauteuil + ---- ... arm ... leg ... foot ... ---- + Railway + station ... railway guard ... guard ... gare + Smoke ... tobacco ... smell ... perfumer ... fumer + Carpet ... fine design ... tapestry ... tapis + Head ... foot ... root ... potato ... tete + Oar ... boat ... war-ship ... ram ... + [See Latin] ... rame + Tears ... hysterics ... fainting fit ... alarm ... larmes + Canvas ... rope ... oakum ... hard labor ... toil ... toile + Wave ... washing ... unwashed ... vagabond ... vague + ---- ... current ... nerve current ... vagus ... ---- + Bed ... bed of sea ... sea-shore ... lee-shore ... lit + Pane ... pain ... sore eyes ... vitriol ... vitre + ---- ... glass ... vitreous ... ---- + Gun ... gunsmith ... spark ... fusee ... fusil + ---- ... foot soldier ... fusilier ... ---- + Shovel ... shoved about ... crowd ... Pall Mall ... pelle + ---- ... sand ... spade ... pail ... ---- + Side-walk ... walking fast ... trotting along ... trottoir + ---- ... mid road ... horses ... trotting ... ---- + Dirty ... second-hand furniture ... furniture ... + sale ... sale + Faithful ... dog-blind fiddler ... fiddle ... fidele + ---- ... faithfulness ... fidelity ... ---- + Pity ... pitying ... misery ... misericorde + Misfortune ... missing train ... mail hour ... malheur + Hang fire ... fire engine ... "haste" ... tear along + too ... faire longfeu + Star ... diamond ... ball dress ... toilet ... etoile + ---- ... Star ... Inn ... hotel ... ---- + Cake ... cheesecake ... mouse ... cat ... gateau + Sword ... soldier ... soldier's pay ... epee + ---- ... war ... misery ... happy ... ---- + Book ... pages ... leaves ... [See Latin] ... livre + Castle ... ruined ... shattered ... chateau + To speak ... converse ... dispute ... parley ... parler + + 1. Why could not "feel" be left out? + 2. Why not omit "science," and say "medical arts"? + 3. Why not omit "angels" and "harps," and simply add "celestial" to + "hymns"? + 4. If the pupil does not know who "Hengler" is, should we not omit + the name and insert instead "singing clown"? + 5. Why should not "fare" be a better In. by sound with "gare" than + "guard"? + 6. If tapestry means other things besides carpets, would not + "tapestry carpet" be a sufficient intermediate? + 7. If "pelle" is pronounced as if applied "pel," ought not "Pall + Mall" to be pronounced as if spelled "Pell Mell"? + + ENGLISH. INTERMEDIATES. ITALIAN. + Basket ... horse-basket ... pannier ... paniera + " ... casket ... ring ... bull ... bellow ... corbello + Gold ... nugget ... ore ... oro + His ... his own ... zone ... bind ... sew ... suo + Thy ... thy face ... head ... foot ... toe ... tuo + Uncle ... "Dutch uncle" ... Holland ... Zuyder Zee ... Zio + Pius ... church ... pew ... Pio + Month ... Month of May ... mace ... mese + Made ... servant-maid ... cook ... fat ... fatto + +Synonyms, as well as words having but a slight difference in sound like +_Insidious_ and _Invidious_ are easily discriminated by _memorised_ +Correlations: INSIDIOUS ... inside ... hole ... fox ... +TREACHERY.--INVIDIOUS ... invade ... hostility ... ILL-WILL. + + 1. Is the letter "i" in Zio pronounced as if spelled Zeeo? + 2. If so, is "pew" a good In. by sound with Pio? + 3. Why would not these be good correlations, viz., INSIDIOUS, + hideous ... moral turpitude ... TREACHERY.--INVIDIOUS ... + perfidious ... betrayal. ILL-WILL. + 4. How many correlations have you made so far? + 5. Have you made your own in every case, or memorised mine in every + case? + 6. Have you indicated the relations in all cases by writing in 1, + 2, or 3? + 7. If not, why not? + + +HOW TO MEMORISE DATES, &c., WHERE YOU ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE FACTS, &c. + +Let every Pupil write examples of his own selection of names Correlated +to Dates of birth and death worked out as below, or some other _pairs_ +of extremes, such as name of ship to its captain on one side, and its +tonnage (or destined port) on the other. + +To remember _Dates_ of _Birth_ and _Death_ (&c.) of men, correlate the +SURNAME AS BEST KNOWN to the word expressing the date of BIRTH, and +correlate the BIRTH-WORD to the DEATH [&c.] word:-- + +Do not look for Analytic Date-words in the following cases until you +have first memorised my Correlations or your own. You can then review +the examples and easily find Analytic Date-words if you are +_sufficiently acquainted_ with the facts of the cases, as: Lord +Beaconsfield (18)05, {S}a{l}ient.[J] Here is a supposed Analytic formula +by English Liberals, of Gladstone's birth:--Gladstone--"{S}u{p}reme" +(18)09; by Foreigners--"{S}u{p}ereminent;" by Tories, "{S}{p}oliator;" by +Home Rulers--"{S}u{p}porter;" by Parnellites--"A{s}{p}erser;" by +Churchmen--"{S}{p}iritual;" by Agnostics--"{S}u{p}erstitious;" by +Unionists--"{S}e{p}aratist;" by admirers of eloquence--"{S}{p}ellbinder;" +by decriers of speaking--"{S}{p}outer." + +[J] One of the meanings of "Salient" is "to force itself on the +attention." Recall his threat when coughed down on the occasion of his +maiden speech in the House of Commons. "You will hear me" (18)05. + + 1. Memorise the correlation you make. + 2. Do you find it difficult to get analytic date-words? + 3. What is necessary in order to get them readily? + + _Lord Beaconsfield_ ... beacon ... the rock ... {t}he {v}e{s}se{l} + [born 1805] + ... Vessel ... anchor ... hope ... {t}o ha{v}e {f}ai{t}h + [died 1881] + + _Mr. Gladstone_ ... gladness ... sorrow ... {t}he hea{v}y {s}o{b} + [born 1809] + ... heavywaters ... Noah's flood ... few saved ... {t}oo {f}ew {m}e{n} + [M. P. in 1832] + + _Napoleon Bonaparte_ ... banishment ... embarkation ... {T}oo{k} {sh}i{p} + [born 1769] + ... Took ship ... masthead ... Godhead ... {D}i{v}i{n}i{t}y ... + [died 1821] + + _Robert Burns_ ... Scottish poet ... map of Scotland ... map of the + World ... {T}he {g}{l}o{b}e + [born 1759] + ... "The Globe" ... newspaper ... page ... Wai{t}i{ng} {p}a{g}e ... + [died 1796] + + _Oliver Goldsmith_ ... poverty ... plenty ... {T}oo{k} e{n}ou{gh} + [born 1728] + ... "bread enough" ... prodigal son ... {Th}e you{ng}e{r} + [died 1774] + + _Nelson_ ... Britain's bulwark ... Whi{t}e {cl}if{f} + [born 1758] + ... Whi{t}e {f}os{s}i{l} + [died 1805] + + _Cardinal Wolsey_ ... butcher ... steel ... straight ... {D}i{r}e{ct} + [born 1471] + ... point ... horns ... {D}i{l}e{m}ma{s} + [died 1530] + + _Cardinal Newman_ ... "kindly light" ... {V}e{s}{t}a + [born 1801] + ... fire goddess ... sun god ... {Ph}oe{b}u{s} + [died 1890] + + _The Marquis of Salisbury_ ... St. Paul's burial ... {Th}e {f}a{m}ou{s} + [born 1830] + {Th}e famous ... Livingstone ... travelling ... {v}oya{g}i{ng} + [succeeded to title 1867] + + _J. J. Rousseau_ ... "Emile" ... early education ... E{d}u{c}a{t}e {n}ow + [born 1712] + ... draw out thought ... I {th}i{n}{k} o{f} you + [died 1778] + + _Charles Darwin_ ... "Natural Selection" ... The chosen one ... Ha{p}py + [born (180)9][K] + ... greatest happiness ... {T}o ha{v}e hea{v}e{n} + [died 1882] + + _George Eliot_ ... Adam Bede ... add ... A{d}{v}a{n}{c}e + [born 1820] + ... Money ... L10 ... {T}wo {f}i{v}e{s} + [died 1880] + + _Richard Wagner_ ... "Music of Future" ... future time ... {T}o ha{v}e + {t}i{m}e + [born 1813] + {T}o ha{v}e {f}a{m}e + [died 1883] + + _The Duke of Albany_ ... delicate ... pale ... white ... Whi{t}e + {f}{l}a{m}e + [born 1853] + {F}i{r}e + [died (18)84] + + _Charles Dickens_ ... "Pickwick Papers" ... picnic biscuits ... + biscuit-tin ... {T}i{n} + [born (18)12] + {C}a{s}e + [died (18)70] + + _Titus Oates_ ... barley ... mash-tub ... man's tub ... {D}io{g}e{n}e{s} + [born 1620] + ... harsh critic ... He a{t}ta{ck}{s} a{l}l + [died 1705] + + The specific gravity of the Iridium is 22.40 + IRIDIUM ... I ridicule ... Ridiculous ... All laugh ... {n}o{n}e + {s}e{r}iou{s}. + =22.40= + See Analytic Substitutions, concerning the expression of decimals. + + One pound avoirdupois equals .45355 of a kilogram-- + POUND AVOIRDUPOIS ... old measure ... new measure ... new reign ... + (=.45355=) Hi{s} {r}u{l}e {m}ay ha{l}low a{l}l. + + Great Earthquake at Lisbon in 1755-- =1 7 5 5= + LISBON ... Listen ... Hush!... TALK LOWLY. + + Sorata (Andes) 21,286 feet high. =2 1 2 8 6= + SORATA ... sore ... cured ... salt fish ... UNEATEN FISH. + + FOUNDATION OF ROME ... Seven hills ... up hill ... + (=753=) {c}{l}i{m}b. + + FIRST PRINTING IN ENGLAND ... Book ... Pamphlet ... + (=1471=) {tr}a{ct}. + + COUNCIL OF TRENT ... rent ... rent roll ... + (=1545=) {d}ai{l}y {r}o{l}l. + + SPANISH ARMADA DESTROYED =1 5 8 8= + Many ships sunk ... few escaped ... THEY LEAVE A FEW. + + America discovered in 1492-- =1 49 2= + AMERICA ... Merry ... Sad ... sad irons ... Handcuffs ... TURPIN. + + Mariners' Compass invented, 1269-- =1 2 6 9= + MARINERS' COMPASS ... pocket compass-- TINY SHAPE. + +[K] It is sufficient to indicate the figure 9, as we know that it could +not have been the year 9 of the Christian Era, and as it was somewhere +about the beginning of this century, the figure 9 makes an indefinite +impression definite and exact. + +Learning dates and other figures by Synthesis is never recommended +except where the pupil is ignorant of the subject matter and cannot in +consequence use Analytic Substitution. Synthesis power has a good +training effect in all cases. + + 1. Is it always necessary for us to know the dates of the birth and + death of men? + 2. Then why do we do this exercise? + 3. What do I want you to get thorough control over? + 4. What will you then be able to do? + 5. The specific gravity of Iridium is 22.40, represented by the + phrase {n}o{n}e {s}e{r}iou{s}; of what use is the first "s" in + the word "serious"? + 6. Why would you not give it the value of (0)? + 7. Give a phrase indicating the height of the Washington Monument + (555 ft.). + 8. Now correlate "Washington Monument" to the phrase you have + given. + 9. Make original correlations for all the events on this page. + 10. Are unfamiliar words of any help in a correlation? + 11. Should they ever be used as intermediates? + 12. Do you try to use as few intermediates as possible? + 13. Are short ones more easily learned? + + +SERIAL FACTS. + +There are two kinds of Serial Facts. + +(1) One is where names or facts are stated in a certain order, as in +alphabetical order, for instance, and yet a different order could be +given. Lists of exceptions in Grammar are usually stated in the +alphabetical order, yet if the component parts or words of the list are +remembered, the alphabetical order is of no consequence. One teacher has +re-arranged Series in Foreign Grammars in such a manner that he finds a +natural suggestiveness between the words. No doubt such a re-arrangement +can be made, but I question whether his doing it for another would help +the latter much. For the pupil to benefit, he should re-adjust the +Series for himself. My Pupils, when trained in Analysis and Synthesis, +have no difficulty in correlating the Series just as they may find it. +No time is spent in trying to discover relations that may not exist. At +best, when found, they will be weak; but, by correlating the series +together, my Pupils make a strong and vivid relation between all of the +words of a Series to be memorised, and at the same time exercise +attention in both its functions, and increase appreciation of In., Ex., +and Con. + + 1. How many kinds of Serial facts are there? + 2. What are the characteristics of the first kind? + 3. Is it advisable for the pupil to re-adjust Series in Foreign + Grammars? + +Suppose we wish to memorise the 11 prepositions which form part of +certain Latin verbs which are followed by the dative, to wit:--_Ad._, +_Ante._, _Con._, _In._, _Inter._, _Ob._, _Post._, _Pre._, _Pro._, +_Sub._, and _Super_. This Series is usually learned by _endless +repetition_, as a succession of sounds to the ear, or sight to the eye, +by mere _rote_. What a waste of time to attempt to re-arrange it in +order to learn it more easily. Yet such a Series can be learned by +correlating the words together in a very short time, thus:-- + + _Ad_ ... addition ... front addition ... _ante_-room.... + _Ante_ ... antecedent ... _con_sequent.... + _Con_ ... converse ... _in_verse.... + _In_ ... + _Inter_ ... interject ... _ob_ject.... + _Ob_ ... obligation ... _post_poned obligation.... + _Post_ ... post-office ... _pre_payments.... + _Pre_ ... predilection ... _pro_pensity.... + _Pro_ ... produce ... soil products ... _sub_soil.... + _Sub_ ... subordinate actor ... _Super_. + +And, similarly, we can deal with any Series in =Grammar=, or elsewhere. + + 1. Do my pupils ever find any difficulty in correlating the series + as they may find it? + 2. What training must they have in order to do so? + 3. Is any time misspent in trying to discover a non-existing + relation? + 4. What are the eleven Latin prepositions here given? + 5. How are they usually learned? + 6. Is time gained thereby? + +(2) The other kind of Series is where the words, facts, or things _must_ +be memorised as given. The seven primary colours are given as they occur +in nature, thus:--Violet, Indigo, Blue, Green, Yellow, Orange, Red. The +unconscionable word VIBGYOR has been given as a means, through the +initial letters of the colour words, to enable us to remember those +words, and ROYGBIV to enable us to remember the Series backwards. To +such a pass are educators driven when they lack my Universal Method of +cementing Extremes. We know the Series both ways if we Correlate the +words, thus: + + _Violet_ ... let go ... + _Indigo_ ... indigestion ... "blues" ... + _Blue_ ... blue sea ... sea green ... + _Green_ ... green corn ... ripe corn ... + _Yellow_ ... yellow fruit ... + _Orange_ ... orangemen ... fights ... blood split ... blood-red ... + _Red_. + + +ORDER OF THE ENGLISH SOVEREIGNS. + +The true Method of learning the Order and Dates of the English +Sovereigns, as of the American Presidents, or of any other list of +Rulers, is to deal with them only in the course of reading. When met +with in History, all the facts are before the reader, and, if he fails +to hold the _order of succession_ clearly in mind in any case, he can +easily correlate the Names together. And if he fails to retain some of +the dates, he can readily make forgetfulness impossible by correlating +names to date-words--or, as the details of the reigns are known to him, +he can at once find analytic date-words. The reader wishes to infallibly +remember that the date of the beheading of Charles I. was 1649. The +formula is "Charles I.--{T}oo {sh}a{r}{p} (1649)." If the reader's +memory-training is imperfect, and he is ignorant of the facts, he had +better correlate. If his memory-education is complete, and the facts are +within his knowledge, he will need no aid, or he will use analytic +date-words as in above case (1) {Th}en (6) {Ch}arles (4) {r}ightly (9) +{b}eheaded. If he feels that he needs some advice to help him remember +the order of succession of the Kings, he can refresh his recollection by +turning back and reading the method already given. + + +EXERCISE.--CASES IN EVERY-DAY LIFE. + +The student must exercise his judgment as to what is the _best known_ to +which he will Correlate an _isolated fact_. + +The following anecdote is taken from the ERA ALMANACK, 1882, p. 36. The +actor, whose name was Taylor, could not remember the name assigned to +him in his part of the play. We shall see how Mnemonics helped him. + +ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS.--Macready was once victimised in _Virginius_. The +Numitorius could not remember the name given him in the play. "You will +remember it, sir," said the tragedian, carefully pronouncing it for him, +"by the association of ideas. Think of Numbers--the Book of Numbers." +The Numitorius did think of it all day, and at night produced through +"the association of ideas" the following effect: + +_Numitorius_--"Where is Virginia? Wherefore do you hold that maiden's +hand?" + +_Claudius_--"Who asks the question?" + +_Numitorius_--"I, her uncle--DEUTERONOMY!" + +The actor should have correlated the word "Numitorius," which he could +_not_ remember, to the word "Uncle" as the BEST KNOWN that preceded it, +which he could remember, or to his "cue" the word "Question" thus: + + UNCLE [2] Nephew [1] You [1] You _knew_--NU-mitorius. _Or_, + + UNCLE [2] Niece [1] Neat [1] Neat and New [1] _A new mitre o'er + us_ [1] NU-mitorius. _Or_, + + QUESTION [1] Wants to know [1] Know [1] Knew [1] _knew my story_ + [1] NU-mitorius. _Or_, + + QUESTION [1] Quest [1] Guessed [1] Knew [1] _Knew a mighty Tory_ + [1] NU-mitorius. + +Had the actor memorised either of these Correlations, he would _not_ +have forgotten Numitorius in his performance. In all similar cases mere +In. by sound, like the word "Numbers" which Macready proposed, and which +is really _not a genuine In. by sound_, is of little service to a poor +memory. A Correlation would have been much better. + +To any conceivable "_Isolated Fact_" you can find a _Best Known_ to +which you can correlate it, and thereby always have it at command. This +is true, even in cases of _anticipatory_ memory. Instead of tying a +string round your finger to remind you to buy something when you get to +the bazaar, and when you get there forgetting to notice the string or +forgetting what the string was intended to remind you of, correlate the +name of what you wish to purchase to the name of something you are sure +to _think_ of at the place you are going to, and memorise the +Correlation. When you see the _Best Known_, the thing you correlated to +it will at once occur to mind. I will add only one more illustration:--A +commercial traveller was in the habit of putting his watch under his +pillow, and also in the habit of forgetting that he put it there! After +losing two watches in this way, he came to me to improve his memory, and +asked me if my System could aid him to think of his watch and where he +had put it. "Infallibly," I replied, "if there is anything you can +mention which you are _certain_ to think of when you get up, such as +boots, trousers, hat, &c." "There is one thing," he rejoined, "I am more +certain to think of than any article of clothing. I always think what a +shame it is I have to get up." "Well, you are sure to think of the words +'get up;' that then is your _Best Known_. Correlate the word 'watch' to +it ... thus: 'GET UP'--Spring up--Watch Spring--WATCH." After a tour +of four months he reported he had always thought of his watch the moment +he awoke. + + +SPEAKING WITHOUT WRITTEN OR PRINTED NOTES. + +After the clergyman has decided on his text, or the speaker on any +subject he has selected for his special topic, the next step is to +_think it out_--to make his plan--his mode of development of his +ideas--their order and sequence, illustrations, &c. All this will +constitute an outline--the SKELETON OF THE DISCOURSE. This should +usually be _committed to paper_. If he possesses the requisite command +of language to enable him to express his views, all he now requires to +do is to _thoroughly memorise_ this Skeleton. + +When this is done, the orator will have no occasion to have any notes +_before him to refer to_, and thereby to remind his audience that he is +merely rehearsing fervour a week or more old; but, having the exact +order of ideas in his memory, he can proceed to speak on each +_successive_ topic until he has exhausted all the points and +illustrations that he had intended to use. + +A young clergyman is very apt to imagine that he will correlate together +20 to 100 propositions in every discourse--a theoretical conjecture +never verified in fact. In _practice_, he will find that he will very +rarely correlate more than ten propositions together, and he will +correlate sub-propositions, citations, or illustrations to the +respective propositions to which they belong. Instead of correlations, +_he may unite his propositions together by analysis_. Each person will +manage this matter as he finds most convenient to himself; or, if he +desires to literally memorise his discourses, he can do so in the manner +pointed out in learning sentences, or by two or three careful perusals. +But, by one who speaks without notes is generally understood one who has +only memorised his leading ideas, and it is always a judicious practice +for a beginner to rehearse his leading topics and their amplifications +in private, _that he may test his memory_, and then _become familiar_ +with a procedure _in private_ in order to be sure to be _perfect in it +before the public_. This private discipline is all the more necessary in +the early stages of extempore speaking--if the speaker is at all +troubled by nervous anxieties or mind-wandering. + +Suppose a teacher of the Art of Expression has studied Moses True +Brown's [see his Synthetic Philosophy of Expression] reduction +of Delsarte's Nine Laws of Gesture to Brown's One Law of +Correspondence--and suppose this teacher wishes to explain to his class, +or to an audience, how Mr. Brown proceeded. If he desires to do this +without notes, he must memorise the order of those Nine Laws; they are +abstractly stated and difficult to correlate, but it can be done. The +Laws are as follows:-- + + Motion, + Velocity, + Direction or Extension, + Re-action, + Form, + Personality, + Opposition of Agents, + Priority, or Sequence, + Rhythm. + +The teacher must correlate these heads or topics of his discourse +together, and so memorise his correlations that he can recall the series +in the exact order. Perhaps he may proceed thus: + + MOTION. + [Rate of motion.] + VELOCITY. + [Relation of motion to time and _space_--.] + DIRECTION or Extension. + [Direction reversed.] + RE-ACTION. + [Mould of Action.] + FORM. + [Form of the Human.] + PERSONALITY. + [Its extremes.] + OPPOSITION OF AGENTS. + [First opponent.] + PRIORITY or Sequence. + [Periodicity of Sequence.] + RHYTHM. + +Knowing these Nine Laws in the above _order_, he can discuss them one +after the other. When he has finished his explanation of the reduction +of the three Forms of Motion [Concentric, Poise, and Eccentric] to the +Law of Correspondence, he can proceed to the consideration of the +sub-topics under Velocity, and so on. When he has fixed the other of his +topics in mind, he has a mental chart or map to guide him in his +exposition, and similarly in other cases. + + +EXERCISE. + +Learn some of the "Antidotes," and at least two of the following series. +Do _not_ learn the extracts from Quain's Anatomy unless you understand +what is meant, or are a medical student. + + +DISTANCES OF PLANETS FROM THE SUN. + + MERCURY--36,000,000 [{M}ercury {Sh}ines]. + + VENUS--67,000,000 [{Sh}e's a {G}oddess]. + + EARTH--93,000,000 [{P}lanetary {M}other]. + + MARS--141,000,000 [{Th}is Wo{r}ld's Ou{t}sider]. + + JUPITER--482,000,000 [{R}ather {F}lattened E{n}ds, or, A {R}oundish + {F}orm U{n}equalled]. + + SATURN--885,000,000 [{F}loods o{f} {L}ight]. + + URANUS--1,780,000,000 [{D}isturbances {C}aused {F}ruitful + {S}earchings]. + + NEPTUNE--2,789,000,000 [{N}eptune {C}onstitutes a {F}rontier + {B}oundary]. + + 1. How many planets are here mentioned? Make your own correlations + between each. + + +EXTRACTS FROM QUAIN'S ANATOMY. + +TO BE STUDIED BY NONE BUT MEDICAL STUDENTS. + +"The Branches of the External Carotid Artery are eight in number, +_viz._, three directed forwards, the superior thyroid, the lingual, and +the facial; two directed backwards, the occipital and the posterior +auricular; and three extending upwards, the ascending pharyngeal branch, +together with the temporal and internal maxillary, the two terminal +branches into which the artery divides." + +Dissect, or study a model or diagram of these branch arteries, and then +the facts are easily learned by means of Correlations:-- + + CAROTID ... rotten ... ruinous ... IVY (eight branches) + ... growth ... advance ... go forwards ... + + FORWARDS ... lead forwards ... conduct ... ductless ... THYROID + ... spheroid ... earth ... many languages ... LINGUAL + ... tongue ... mouth ... face ... FACIAL + ... front ... back ... + + BACKWARDS ... back of head ... occiput .... OCCIPITAL + ... occult ... secret ... confession ... AURICULAR + ... ocular ... eye ... high up ... + + UPWARDS ... ascending ... ASCENDING PHARYNGEAL + ... congeal ... frozen Thames ... temporary ... TEMPORAL + ... pour out shot ... Maxim gun ... + _or_ "be temperate" ... maxim ... MAXILLARY + +To memorise the attachments of muscles, first of all familiarise +yourself by diligent dissection with the aspects of the muscles and the +actual facts of their attachments. It is possible to memorise their +origins and insertions by my System, merely from their written +descriptions; but this is not _learning_. It is a vicious system of +cramming, which can do no good. When you have thoroughly familiarised +yourself with the actual facts proceed to fix these facts in your +memory by my System. In dealing with facts of such complexity as the +origin and insertion of muscles, it may be needful to have free recourse +to the assistance of homophones, &c. In the whole of anatomy there is no +task so difficult as that of learning the precise attachments of the +muscles of the back. Few students master these attachments thoroughly, +and those who do, fail to retain them long. + + 1. Are all students required to learn extracts from Quain's + Anatomy? + 2. How many branches are there of the External Carotid Artery? + 3. Describe them. + 4. Is it an advantage in studying Anatomy to dissect or study a + model? + 5. How are the facts, then, easily learned? + 6. Make original correlations for this Extract. + 7. Do you use any unfamiliar words in your correlations? + 8. How do you memorise the attachments of muscles? + 9. Is it possible to memorise their origins and insertions by my + System? + 10. Is this _learning_? + 11. What is it then? + +By the System it is easy to learn facts of Anatomy. But the System is no +substitute for _dissection and experiment_. You can get a COMPREHENSION +of anatomical facts only by _actual experience_, and to attempt to +require an _understanding_ of them from books is to substitute a +knowledge of words for a knowledge of things. + +The following will indicate one way in which you may proceed in +memorising the attachments of the muscles of the back: + +(1) First make a homophone of the name of the muscle. + +(2) Indicate each attachment of the muscle by two words. + + The initial letter of the first word should indicate the part of + bone to which the muscle is attached, _e.g._, Sp = spinous process, + T = transverse process, R = rib, &c. The second word should indicate + by its consonants the _numbers_ of the bones to which the + attachment is made. + +(3) Correlate the homophone of the muscle to the first pair of words, + and the first pair to the second pair. For example: + +"The SPLENIUS COLLI is attached, inferiorly, to the spinous processes of +the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth dorsal vertebrae, and superiorly to +the transverse processes of the first two or three cervical vertebrae." + + spleniuS COLLi (homophone) SCOLD. + SCOLD ... cold ... marble ... SPLENDID IMAGE ... + gold statuette ... chimney ornament ... clock ... 'TIS TIME. + +In the first pair of words the initial of Splendid shows that the +attachment is to the Spinous processes, and the word Image indicates +that the vertebrae implicated are the third to the sixth. The second pair +show that the transverse processes, from the first to the third, are +those into which the muscle is inserted. + +"The SPLENIUS CAPITIS arises from the spines of the seventh cervical and +two upper dorsal vertebrae and from the ligamentum nuchae. It is inserted +into the lower and back part of the mastoid process, and into the outer +part of the superior curved line of the occipital bone." + + spleniuS CAPitis (homophone) ESCAPE. + ESCAPE ... flight ... projectile ... trajectory ... conic section ... + SPLIT CONE. + split ... spliced ... ligatured ............ LIGAMENTUM NUCHAE. + new keel ... ship ... mast ................. MASTOID. + masticate ... eat ... drink ... sip ........ OCCIPITAL. + + 1. Do you need to use Homophones in this study? + 2. What is the most difficult task in Anatomy? + 3. Do students generally master this thoroughly? + 4. What makes the learning of Anatomy easy? + 5. Is my System a substitute for dissection? + 6. How can you get a comprehension of anatomical facts? + + +POISONS AND ANTIDOTES. + +Narcotic poisons are neutralized by vinegar:--NARCOTICS ... torpor ... +strong wine ... sour wine ... _vinegar_. + +Wine, brandy, coffee, and camphor may be used to rouse those who have +taken laudanum or any other preparation of opium ... OPIUM ... opium +eater ... intemperate ... _brandy_ ... _wine_ ... beverage ... _coffee_ +... cough ... cold ... camphorated spirit ... _camphor_. + +Mucilage, camphor, and oil may be taken to neutralize +cantharides:--CANTHARIDES ... hair-grower ... _oil_ ... smooth-running +... ease ... comfort ... _camphor_ ... fur cat ... mew ... _mucilage_. + +Ten drops of ammonia in a glass of sugared water sobers a tipsy +man:--DRUNK ... alcohol ... volatile spirits ... volatile ... alkali ... +_ammonia_ ... to moan ... {t}o {s}igh (10) ... pathos ... sweet tears ... +_sugared water_. + +ACONITE ... night boat ... sea sick ... _emetics_ ... exhaustion ... +_stimulants_ ... hard drinking ... spontaneous combustion ... _animal +charcoal_. + + 1. Are antidotes for Poisons easy to remember? + 2. Should not all persons have a knowledge of the antidotes for the + ordinary poisons? + 3. What method have I given to obtain such knowledge? + 4. What is the relation between "Narcotics" and "torpor"? + +CHLORIDE OF LIME ... bad smell ... bad egg ... _white of egg_ ... fowl +... grain ... _flour_ ... flour and water ... milk fluid ... _milk_. + +Oil, milk (any fatty mucilaginous substance), may protect the coats of +the stomach against oil of vitriol and other acrid poisons:--ACRID +... curd ... curdled milk ... _milk_ ... butter ... melted butter ... +_oil_. + +STRONG ACIDS [Sulphuric Acid (oil of vitriol), Nitric Acid, Hydrochloric +Acid] ... alkali ... lemon kali ... effervescing draught ... citrate of +magnesia ... _Magnesia_ ... antacid ... _Bicarbonate of Soda_ ... potash +... potash soap ... _soap suds_ ... emollient ... _Emollient Drinks_. + +CARBOLIC ACID ... liquid ... oil ... sweet oil ... castor oil ... +aperient ... _Epsom Salts_ ... white ... _white of egg_. + +Prussic acid (Hydrocyanic Acid) is neutralized by alkalies and freshly +precipitated oxide of iron:--PRUSSIC ACID ... tartaric acid ... +carbonate of soda ... _alkali_ ... lie on the side ... _oxide of iron_ +... steel file ... rasp ... _artificial respiration_. [HYDROCYANIC ACID +... cyanotic ... asphyxiated ... no respiration ... _Artificial +respiration_ ... perspiration ... hot ... _cold effusion_ ... exposed to +wet ... rust ... _fresh precipitated oxide of iron_.] + +Soap and Sulphide of Potassium are antidotes against arsenic and other +metallic poisons: METALLIC ... lick ... cat-lick ... wash ... _soap_ ... +potash soap ... potassium ... _sulphide of potassium_. + +TARTRATED ANTIMONY ... tartar emetic ... vomiting ... irritating ... +_emollient drinks_ ... ladies drink ... _strong tea_ ... bitter infusion +... _tannic acid_. + +NITRATE OF SILVER ... silver sand ... seashore ... _sea water_ ... +_common salt_ ... white ... _white of egg_ ... fowls ... barley ... +_barley water_ ... warm water ... vomiting ... _emetics_. + +PERCHLORIDE OF MERCURY ... quicksilver ... white ... _white of egg_ ... +piecrust ... _wheat flour_ ... flowers of sulphur ... milk of sulphur +... _milk_. + + 1. Can you discover more than one relation existing between "grain" + and "flour"? + 2. Why could we not use the single word "white," to connect "white + of egg" to "flour"? + 3. What is the relation between "liquid" and "oil"? + 4. What two relations exist between "vomiting" and "irritating"? + 5. What one, between "fowls" and "barley"? + 6. Why? + 7. What is the relation between "wheat flour" and "flowers of + sulphur"? + +STRYCHNINE ... nerve stimulant ... nerve sedative ... _Bromide of +Potassium and Chloral Hydrate_ ... organic compound ... heated organic +compound ... charcoal ... _animal charcoal_ ... charcoal fumes ... +asphyxia ... _artificial respiration_ ... perspiration ... tea ... +_tannic acid_ ... acidity ... dyspepsia ... vomiting ... _emetics_. + +BELLADONNA ... deadly nightshade ... deadly sick ... _emetic_ ... +_mustard and water_ ... brandy and water ... _stimulants_ ... hot ... +perspiration ... _pilocarpine_ [p. injected hypodermically causes +profuse perspiration]. + + +THE TWELVE PAIRS OF CRANIAL NERVES. + +The following list is worked out for practice _much more fully_ than a +medical student would do if he were learning the list in his studies. +The medical student would doubtless first objectively identify these +nerves in dissection, and then use correlations to help him remember +those which his natural memory could not carry. If not a medical +student, my pupil may omit this and the previous examples from Quain's +Anatomy. + + +THE TWELVE PAIRS OF CRANIAL NERVES. + +CRANIAL NERVES ... within the skull ... wi{th}i{n} (12 pairs) ... +withdrawal ... draw oil ... oil factory ... OLFACTORY (1st pair) ... +manufactory ... smoke ... _smell_ ... scent-bottle ... glass ... optical +glass ... OPTIC (2nd pair) ... optician ... eyeglass ... _sight_ ... +eye-witness ... ocular demonstration ... OCCULO MOTOR (3rd pair) ocular +motions ... _move the eye many ways_ ... tear in the eye ... TROCHLEAR +or PATHETIC (4th pair) ... moving ... _move the eye obliquely_ ... +obtuse angle ... triangle ... TRIGEMINAL (5th pair) ... gem ... +sparkling ... _eye_ ... eyetooth ... _jaw_ ... talk ... _tongue_ ... +_taste_ ... good taste ... good feeling ... _feeling_ ... feelers ... +_motion_ ... ocean ... sailors ... absent from home ... ABDUCENT (6th +pair) ... sent out ... see out ... _moves the eye outwards_ ... face +outwards ... FACIAL (7th pair--motor to muscles of expression) ... face +... audience ... AUDITORY (8th pair, sensory for hearing and +equilibration) ... ear-ring ... shiny ... glossy ... GLOSSO-PHARYNGEAL +(9th pair, taste, swallow) ... congeal ... unfixed ... vague ... VAGUS +(10th pair, pneumogastric) ... gusty ... blown back ... backbone ... +SPINAL ACCESSORY (11th pair, moves head) _and motor_ ... spines ... +sharp criticism ... hypercritical ... HYPOGLOSSAL (12th pair) ... +glossary ... foreign tongue ... _Tongue Muscles_. + + 1. Between "perspiration" and "tea"? + 2. Why so? + 3. Explain the relation between "Belladonna" and "deadly + nightshade." + 4. What advice is here given the medical student? + 5. Are you required to learn the twelve pairs of cranial nerves if + you are not a medical student? + 6. What do the words printed in italics indicate in this exercise? + 7. Is it essential for the medical student to know these uses? + 8. What word indicates the number of pairs of cranial nerves? + 9. Through what consonant? + + +PROTOPLASM. + +Albumen, gluten, fibrin, syntonin, are closely allied substances known +as proteids, and each is composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and +nitrogen. + +PROTEIDS ... Protector ... commonwealth ... for all ... _albumen_ ... +all men ... liars ... fibs ... _fibrin_ ... brindled ... spotted ... sin +... _syntonin_ ... toe nails ... hoofs ... glue ... _gluten_. + +The foregoing exercises show that there are no facts of Science, &c., or +in Daily Life, with which the System cannot cope--thus proving the +greatest saver of Labour and Time if the pupil makes an application of +it to his studies or business when once he has mastered the system. + + + + +BOOKS LEARNED IN ONE READING. + + +For the past ten years I have printed in my large prospectus a general +view of my meaning. I will reproduce most of those views here, premising +that I have never suggested that books are to be _learned by heart_, but +only the _important_, _useful_ portions of them--such as are new to the +reader and which he may desire to retain. + +I do not mean such books as Bradshaw's Guide, the London Post-Office +Directory, or any other mere collection of names, addresses, statistics, +&c., which one may have occasion to _consult_, but which it would be the +mere bravado of Memory to learn by heart--though even this is possible +enough to the master of my System. What is one's object in reading a +book? Simply to retain the IDEAS in it that are NEW and USEFUL to him, +as well as the NEW USES that are therein set forth of _old_ and +_familiar_ ideas. If the reader is already partly acquainted with a +book, there will be fewer new ideas in it than in one with which he is +unacquainted. Now, what do I mean by Learning either of these books in +one reading? I mean exactly what I say. All that you desire to remember +shall be retained--all the leading or subordinate ideas, propositions, +illustrations, facts, &c., &c. + +There are only two ways of learning a book in this thorough manner: + +(1) _The first_ is the traditional method of learning by _rote_ or +endless repetition. A celebrated Coach in Anatomy says that no one can +learn Anatomy until he has learned and _forgotten_ it from three to +seven times! In learning any book in this way, each sentence would be +repeated over and over again, and then reviewed and _re_learnt and +forgotten and learned again! And then at last the Pupil if he possesses +a first-rate _cramming_ memory might answer questions on it. In learning +a book by _rote_, the number of times that each sentence and section is +repeated, if actually written out and printed, would doubtless cover +5,000 to 50,000 or more pages!--and even then the Pupil passes his +examination, if he really does "pass," partly by luck and partly by +merit; all his life he is constantly referring to it, and repeating it, +and studying it, over and over again--showing really that he possesses +little more than a Reference Memory in regard to it! But let us be +candid and confess the truth; tens of thousands every year and during +successive years try the various professions--law, medicine, divinity, +or sciences, history, &c., &c., and utterly fail to "pass," even +respectably, because they lack the extraordinary sensuous MEMORY +necessary to acquire knowledge by _rote_. + +It is only the exceptionally powerful natural memories that win at +exacting examinations by _rote_--even then their learning is soon +forgotten, unless it is _perpetually renewed_. + +(2) The other mode of learning any book in the thorough manner I have +indicated, whether it be a book in which the reader finds but _few_ +novel ideas or where they are _all new_, as in a scientific or technical +work, is by my Method. In fact, I believe no one can learn any book so +thoroughly by _rote_, even if he possesses a marvellous Natural Memory +and if he peruse it ever so many times, as my Pupils can by my method in +a single perusal. Let the reader note that my System has two important +aspects--(1) It is a Device or Method of memorising or learning any +facts whatever--prose, poetry, dates, data, formulae and facts and +principles of the sciences, &c., &c., &c., or anything whatsoever to be +remembered. (2) There is another equally, if not _more_ important aspect +of it, namely, as a _Trainer or Strengthener of the Natural Memory_ to +any extent the pupil wishes to carry it. And the Natural Memory is so +strengthened by the use of the System, that as a Device, the System is +no longer required. You then remember from your new Memory-power without +taking any pains to remember, and I am happy to add that the diligent +student can derive the full benefit of the System as a Memory Trainer by +learning the lessons in the way I point out. + +Now, those who have thus derived the _full benefit_ of the System, both +as a Device for memorising and also as a Memory Trainer, _are the +persons who can learn a book in one reading_. "Reading" is used by +Coaches in a technical sense; that is, synonymous with "thorough study." +By a "single" or "one reading," I mean a single careful perusal _in +conformity to the requirements of my System_. I do not mean that they +can do this and doze during the process. + +I now reproduce most of the plan always adopted in dealing with books +whose contents, or the unfamiliar portions of them are to be mastered. + +(1) You will not read the book with the _rapidity_ with which some young +ladies are said to devour the latest novel. They are often suspected of +skipping pages at a time in order to discover the different stages of a +plot, until a thoroughly aroused curiosity compels them to hasten at +once to the last chapter to fall upon the denouement. This is not the +style of perusal I contemplate. + +(2) Nor is it to be supposed because you understand the method that it +will therefore work itself. It has to be _applied_ carefully and +methodically _at least once_. This necessarily demands _time_, +especially at first. Those who possess good health and good continuity, +and a mastery of the System, accomplish the retention of a work in +vastly less time than would be possible for them without the System, and +the study is a pleasure instead of a task. On the other hand, those who +are in the possession of poor health or of weak concentration, or who +are overburdened with business anxieties, domestic cares or competitive +worries, would very seldom, if ever, master any book in the ordinary way +by _mere repetition_. These persons are extremely unfavourably situated +to do justice to the System, and it costs them more time and trouble to +master a book than the former class. A student admitted that he had +carefully read a manual of English History completely through _sixteen_ +times, and then failed in the examination. To have obtained a lasting +knowledge of this History by my method would probably have occupied him +as long as he was formerly engaged in _two or three_ of the sixteen +fruitless perusals of it. There is, however, only one difference between +this unfortunate student and the great majority of those who succeed in +the examinations through _cramming_. He forgot all his historical +knowledge _before_ the examination--they usually forget theirs shortly +_after_. In fact, a student or a man in advanced years who has really +mastered any book so that he never has to refer to it again is a wonder. +Take the memories of members of the learned professions--they are +usually only REFERENCE memories. They know where to _find_ the coveted +knowledge, but they do not _possess_ it or _retain_ it in their minds. +On the other hand, the student who masters a book by my method _really +knows_ the contents of it, and he is thus enabled to devote to other +purposes _an enormous amount of time in the future_ that other people +have to spend in _perpetually refreshing_ their superficial +acquirements. Moreover, the average student who has carried out _all_ my +instructions can even _now_ learn as much by my Method in any stated +time as he could learn without my Method, and _with equal thoroughness_ +in many, many times as long a period! And if any one who has been +pressed for time, or who has been in a panic about an impending +examination, or who has been too much troubled with Discontinuity, too +ill in general health, or too idle, to do more than superficially glance +at my lessons--if any such person doubts his competency to accomplish as +much as the diligent student of average ability has done, then let him +turn back and really and truly MASTER my System [for he does not even +KNOW what my System is until he has faithfully carried out to the very +letter all my instructions, unless he has been a pupil of my oral +lectures], and then and not before he will probably find that the +achievements of the average diligent student of my System are quite +within the easy range and scope of his own powers. + +(3) In regard to the _subject matter_ of the book, you do not care to +occupy yourself with what you are _already familiar_ with, and in most +books there are a great many things that you already know. In many +works, too, there is a great deal of padding-matter inserted to increase +the bulk of the book, and possessing no permanent interest. The +expositions and explanations which enable you to _understand_ the new +matter usually take up a large part of the book, and sometimes much the +largest part of it, and are not to be memorised, but only understood +with a sole view to appreciate the valuable and important parts of the +book--these expositions can be learned if desired--but they usually +serve only a preliminary purpose. There is also very much +_repetition_--the same matter in new dress, is reintroduced for sake of +additional comments or applications. You do not trouble yourself with +these iterations. The contents of a book which demand your attention are +the IDEAS which are NEW to you, or the NEW USES made of familiar ideas. + +Students who have not learned to exercise any independent thought often +confess that in reading any book they are always in a maze. One thing +seems just as important as another. To them the wheat looks exactly like +the chaff. As an illustration that the power of Analysis is entirely +wanting in many cases, I may mention that I once received a letter in +which the writer had literally copied one of my column advertisements, +and then added, "Please send me what relates to the above!" A modicum of +mental training would have led him to say, "Kindly send me your +Prospectus." + + +LEARN FIRST TO MAKE ABSTRACTS OF WHAT IS NEW TO YOU. + +A great authority on education says: "Any work that deserves thorough +study, deserves the labor of making an Abstract, _without which, indeed, +the study is not thorough_." + +A work which deserves thorough study is obviously one full of IDEAS, new +to the reader, such as the student must master. + +If you are thinking of making an Abstract of a particular book, awaken +the utmost interest in regard to it before you begin. Are you sure that +it is worthy of thorough study? Is it the last or best work on the +subject? And if you advance, note in a separate memorandum book your +criticisms on the author's method and the soundness of his views. These +criticisms will help keep up your interest in the Abstract, and at the +close enable you to suggest modifications, additions, excisions, or a +refutation. + +Three things are required: (1) To learn =how= to abstract; (2) To =make= +one, at least, such abstract; and (3) To =learn= it when made. + + +HOW TO MAKE ABSTRACTS. + +Let the ambitious student make an Abstract of any chapter of John Stuart +Mill's Logic, and then compare his work with the Analysis of this same +chapter by the Rev. A. H. Killick (published by Longmans), and he will +at once see the enormous difference between the essentials and the +non-essentials--the difference between the subject of discussion and the +_explanation_ or _exposition_ of it. The student's abstract, if printed, +would extend over twenty to thirty pages. Mr. Killick's only occupies +two to five pages. But do not reverse the process and read Mr. Killick's +Analysis first and then make your Abstract. The latter, however, is _the +easier_, _the usual_, and _the useless_ method. Let the student continue +this comparison till he attains very nearly the brevity and +discrimination displayed by Mr. Killick. Or, if he prefers History, let +him write a summary of any chapter of Green's "Short History of the +English People," and then compare his digest with Mr. C. W. A. Tait's +Analysis of the same chapter (now bound up with Green's History, as +lately published in England). It would be a capital training for the +student to abstract the whole of Green's work and compare his abridgment +of each chapter with that of Mr. Tait. After considerable practice in +this way in making Abstracts and _comparing his work with that of such +Masterly Abstractors_ as Dr. Killick and Mr. Tait, the student who needs +this training is prepared to make abstracts of his own text-books. + +Any other work of which an Abstract is published will serve the student +as well as the above. There were formerly published Abstracts of several +law books. And there may be other works whose abstracts are available to +the ambitious student. + +Abstracts would be very amusing if they did not indicate an almost +total failure of educational training in the matter of _thinking for +one's self_. Recently a Pupil brought me a work on Physiology, written +for general readers, and pointing to a paragraph in it that occupied +nearly a whole page, exclaimed, "The only way I can make an abstract of +that paragraph is to _learn it by heart_!" A glance at it showed me that +I could express the gist and pith of it in the following sentence:--"The +pulse beats 81 times per minute when you are standing, 71 times when +sitting, and 66 times when lying down." After a re-perusal of the +paragraph he remarked, "You are right. That is all one cares to remember +in that long passage." To his request for me to memorise the Abstract, I +replied by asking what is the "Best Known" in it. Why, "pulse," of +course. It is merely occupied with the _number of times_ the pulse beats +per minute in different positions of the body. Now correlate (memorising +your correlations as you proceed) "pulse" to "standing," and "standing" +to a word expressing 81 ({f}ee{t}); "sitting" to a word that translates +71 ({c}augh{t}); and "lying down" to a word that spells in figures 66 +({j}ud{g}e). The bodily positions being exhaustively enumerated need not +be correlated together. Pulse ... beating ... fighting ... stand-up +fight ... STANDING ... stand ... small table ... table legs ... FEET. +SITTING ... rest ... arrest ... CAUGHT. LYING DOWN ... lies ... perjury +... trial ... JUDGE. + +These efforts in abstracting will qualify the young student to +distinguish the main ideas from the subordinate ones, and he will then +know when reading a book what to attend to and what to reject. Try a +short essay first, then a longer one; and at last, when you are familiar +with the method, attack any book, and you will cope with it +successfully. Not much practice in this way will be required to enable +you to know, from a glance at the _table of contents_, just what to +assail and what to disregard. And in all your _first_ attempts in +reading a technical work, make out an Abstract of each chapter in +writing, and then deal only with this Abstract. Whenever the Subject is +not treated in a desultory manner, but with logical precision, you will +soon be able to find Suggestive or Prompting Words in the Sequence of +Ideas and in the successive Links in the Chain of Thought that runs +through the exposition. If there is no such Sequence of Ideas or Chain +of Thought running through it, it may serve as an amusement, but is +little likely to command serious study. _In a short time_ you will be +able, in the language of Dr. Johnson, "to tear out the heart of any +book." Hazlitt said that Coleridge rarely read a book through, "but +would plunge into the marrow of a new volume and feed on all the +nutritious matter with surprising rapidity, grasping the thought of the +author and following out his reasonings to consequences of which he +never dreamt." Such a result is rarely attained even by the ablest of +men--but it is the ultimate goal at which every student should aim--an +aim in which he will be largely assisted by the ART OF ASSIMILATIVE +MEMORY. + +There are four methods of learning abstracts: one is by Synthesis; the +other is by the Analytic-Synthetic Method, the third is mostly by +Assimilative Analysis, and the fourth method is by the memory developed +and trained by the System, but which is not consciously used. + +(1) It is the novelties of Fact, Opinion, Illustration, &c., set forth +in your Abstract that you correlate together, thus: You correlate the +Title of the First Chapter to the Title of the Book; next, the Titles of +the Chapters to each other; and then you correlate, in each chapter, the +first leading idea or proposition to the title of the chapter, the +second leading idea to the first, &c., &c. In this way you will proceed +until you have absorbed all the _new ideas_, _facts_, _statistics_ or +_illustrations_, or whatever you wish to retain. You can then test +yourself on the work by calling to mind whatever you have thus cemented +together. If this is well done you will never have to do it again. + +(2) We have already seen how to apply the Analytic-Synthetic Method in +learning by heart selections in Prose or Poetry, and same method can be +used in memorising an Abstract of such parts of a book as are new to the +reader. This method, too, once used in addition to what has been done by +the pupil, will make a further resort to it unnecessary. + +(3) And the same remark applies to the third method. + +(4) The fourth method is the pupil's final method. + +The foregoing exhaustive methods of dealing with a book are recommended +to those only whose natural memories are not yet made powerfully +retentive by the System as a Memory-TRAINER. If, however, a Pupil +possesses a good natural memory and a mastery of the System as a Device +for memorising, and he has also greatly added to the power of his +Concentration as well as his memory by doing all the exercises, he _will +not use my System, even in the reading of the first book, except now and +then_--certainly _not_ constantly, but _only occasionally_. Although not +necessary in case of memories made strong by the System, yet I do most +earnestly recommend the most gifted and highly endowed to deal with +_one_ book in the above thorough-going manner. As for instance, Herbert +Spencer's little work on Education [four short essays]. Dr. Charles +Mercier, who next to Herbert Spencer is the most original and clear +sighted Psychologist in England, presents, in a work entitled "Sanity +and Insanity," a scarcely equalled example of lucid exposition and +logical development. Whichever one is selected it should be fairly and +honestly handled by my method. The gain to Intellectual Comprehension +from having carefully abstracted one book, and the gain to the memory +from having made and memorised the Abstract, will produce results that +will last through life, and make all subsequent acquisitions more easy +and delightful, and make all further abstracts probably unnecessary. + + +HOW TO LEARN A LONG SERIES OF UNCONNECTED FACTS IN THE SCIENCES OR +EVENTS IN HISTORY, CHAPTERS IN BOOKS, OR THE CONTENTS OF BOOKS. + +1. It is useless for the pupil to attempt to learn the exercise here +given unless he has carefully studied the Building, Ice, Presidential, +and English Sovereign Series. The _meaning_ of In., Ex., and Con. can be +understood in application to the facts of life, the events of History +and the principles and details of the Arts and Sciences, only by a +complete mastery of all that precedes this exercise. + +2. Let the pupil learn only _ten_ facts, propositions or statements at +each of the first few sittings, and then, as he adds ten more, let him +recite from memory all that he has previously learned of this exercise. +The _cementing relations_ of In., Ex., and Con., which bind the events +together, must in each case be first found by the student himself, and +afterwards, and not before, let him glance at my analysis which follows +this series. + +3. The lawyer, in selecting 100 or 1,000 events of the Victorian Era, +would doubtless make a list interesting to lawyers, the physician would +make one of interest mostly or mainly to doctors, and similarly with +educators, statesmen, editors, &c., &c. But I have selected events with +a view to find the most difficult cases to deal with and with no other +view, and if the pupil masters these, all other work hereafter will be +easy to him. + +4. This method can be promptly used, provided the pupil does not attempt +to engorge or cloy his mind by undertaking too much at a time at first. +Practice will soon make longer exercises easy. Each of the following six +Exercises is enough for any one session or sitting. + +5. Between a pair of _words_ it may be difficult sometimes to find +either the relation of In., Ex., or Con.; but in the case of sentences, +propositions or descriptions, it is always easy to find one or other of +the cementing relations. Relations which to me are strong, may seem weak +to some pupils. No two persons would find the same relation in some +cases, but, however different the solutions may be, they must always +verify In., Ex., or Con. + +6. The Int. Analysis, the Analytic-Synthetic, or the mere Analytic +method, will enable the pupil to memorise the statement or sentence +which describes the fact whenever any aid is necessary. + +7. This Method can be readily applied to events in ancient or modern +times, or to an accumulation of facts in the sciences, &c. + +8. If we were to express only the year the formula would in most cases +be different. To indicate the month and the day of the month, a +consistent phrase must be used. + + + + +ONE HUNDRED EVENTS OF THE VICTORIAN ERA, LEARNED BY ONE CAREFUL READING +OR STUDY. + + +FIRST EXERCISE. + + 1--The Victoria era begins June 20, 1837 + + 2--Abolition of death penalty for forgery and some + other crimes July 17, 1837 + + 3--Question of Trades Unionism brought before the + House of Commons by Mr. Wakley and Mr. Daniel + O'Connell Feb. 13, 1838 + + 4--First steam voyage across the Atlantic Ocean + _completed_ in 15 days by the _Great Western_ June 17, 1838 + + 5--International Copyright Act passed July 31, 1838 + + 6--Chartist Meetings proclaimed illegal Dec. 12, 1838 + + 7--Anti-corn Law League formed Dec. 19, 1838 + + 8--Penny Postage Act passed Aug. 17, 1839 + + 9--Marriage of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert at + the Chapel Royal, St. James's, by the Archbishop + of Canterbury Feb. 10, 1840 + + =10=--Birth of Princess Royal Nov. 21, 1840 + + +SECOND EXERCISE. + + 11--Birth of Prince of Wales Nov. 9, 1841 + + 12--Earl of Munster's suicide Mar. 20, 1842 + + 13--Monster Chartist Petition, borne by 16 men and + containing 3,317,702 names, denied a hearing + before the bar of the House of Commons May 2, 1842 + + 14--Defeat of Boers at Natal by the British troops May 26, 1842 + + 15--Treaty with the United States of America on + North-West Boundary, Slave Trade and Extradition Aug. 9, 1842 + + 16--Defeat of Ameers at Meanee by Sir Charles + Napier. Loss 10,000 Jan. 16, 1843 + + 17--Birth of Princess Maud Mary Alice Apr. 25, 1843 + + 18--Arkwright's son leaves his heirs L8,000,000 May 24, 1843 + + 19--Birth of Prince Alfred Ernest Albert, Duke of + Edinburgh and of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Aug. 6, 1844 + + =20=--Imprisonment for debt under L20 abolished Aug. 10, 1844 + + +THIRD EXERCISE. + + 21--Maynooth College Endowment Bill passed by House + of Lords by 131 majority May 16, 1845 + + 22--Faraday announces discovery tending to show that + _light_, _heat_, and _electricity_ are but + different manifestations of one great universal + principle Nov. 5, 1845 + + 23--Birth of Princess Helena May 25, 1846 + + 24--Opening of new Philosophical Institute at + Edinburgh Nov. 4, 1846 + + 25--Shakespeare's House, at Stratford-on-Avon, + purchased by the Shakespeare Committee for + L3,000 Sept.16, 1847 + + 26--Commercial crisis: Bank of England rate raised + to 9 per cent. Oct. 31, 1847 + + 27--Chloroform administered by Professor Simpson at + Edinburgh Nov. 12, 1847 + + 28--The French Revolution of Feb. 22, 1848 + + 29--Birth of Princess Louise Mar. 18, 1848 + + =30=--Kossuth claims protection from England Sept.20, 1849 + + +FOURTH EXERCISE. + + 31--Treaty with United States in regard to the + Nicaragua Canal Apr. 19, 1850 + + 32--Sir Robert Peel's fall from a horse, on + Constitution Hill, June 29, resulted in his + death July 2, 1850 + + 33--A Farewell Benefit to William Macready, the + tragedian, at Drury Lane Theatre Feb. 26, 1851 + + 34--Opening of International Exhibition by Her + Majesty, in Hyde Park May 1, 1851 + + 35--Louis Napoleon's Coup d'etat Dec. 2, 1851 + + 36--Duke of Wellington's Death Sept.14, 1852 + + 37--Birth of Prince Leopold Apr. 7, 1853 + + 38--Lord Palmerston advises Presbytery of Edinburgh + to first consult the laws of sanitation before + ordering a fast on account of the Cholera Oct. 19, 1853 + + 39--Rev. F. D. Maurice dismissed from King's College + for opinion's sake Oct. 27, 1853 + + =40=--War declared by Russia against Turkey Nov. 1, 1853 + + +FIFTH EXERCISE. + + 41--War declared by England, against Russia Mar. 22, 1854 + + 42--Epochal Work--Spencer's Psychology 1855 + + 43--Treaty of Peace between England, France, and + Russia, at Paris Mar. 30, 1856 + + 44--Bands play on Sunday afternoons in Kensington + Gardens Apr. 13, 1856 + + 45--Birth of Princess Beatrice Apr. 14, 1857 + + 46--Capture of Delhi Sept.20, 1857 + + 47--First Sitting of the Court for Divorces: Sir + Cresswell Cresswell, Judge Ordinary Jan. 16, 1858 + + 48--Statue of Sir Isaac Newton unveiled by Lord + Brougham at Grantham Sept.21, 1858 + + 49--Darwin's "Origin of Species" published 1859 + + =50=--Death of Lord (Thomas Babington) Macaulay Dec. 28, 1859 + + +SIXTH EXERCISE. + + 51--Thomas Hopley, schoolmaster, sentenced to 4 + years' penal servitude for causing the death of + R. C. Cancellor by excessive corporal punishment July 23, 1860 + + 52--Lord Clarence advises Ironclads for the Navy Mar. 11, 1861 + + 53--Recognition by English Government of the + Southern Confederacy May 8, 1861 + + 54--Death of Prince Consort of gastric fever Nov. 14, 1861 + + 55--Marriage of Prince of Wales and Princess + Alexandra of Denmark Mar. 10, 1863 + + 56--Tercentenary of Shakespeare's birth Apr. 23, 1864 + + 57--Tercentenary of the death of Calvin May 27, 1864 + + 58--Inauguration of a statue to Sir Wm. Jenner, at + Boulogne Sept. 1, 1865 + + 59--Albert Medal for those who in saving life + endanger their own Mar. 7, 1866 + + =60=--Mr. Peabody thanked by H. M. the Queen for his + munificent gifts to the poor of London Mar. 28, 1866 + + 61--Government requires Electric Telegraph July 31, 1868 + + 62--University of Edinburgh admits women to the + study of medicine Oct. 27, 1869 + + 63--Act for the abolition of imprisonment for debt + comes into effect Jan. 1, 1870 + + 64--Prof. Tyndall traces propagation of disease by + _dust_ and _germs_ floating in the air Jan. 14, 1870 + + 65--Prince of Wales attacked with typhoid fever Nov. 23, 1871 + + 66--Geneva Convention awards the United States of + America, on account of Alabama Claims, + L3,000,000 against Great Britain Sept.14, 1873 + + 67--Miss Richards, of Stapleton, walked 1000 miles + in 1000 consecutive hours June 29, 1874 + + 68--Captain Boynton crosses English Channel (second + attempt) in his swimming dress May 28, 1875 + + 69--British Museum lighted by electricity Oct. 20, 1879 + + =70=--Tay Bridge disaster Dec. 28, 1879 + + 71--Death of Mrs. Mary Ann Cross (George Eliot) Nov. 22, 1880 + + 72--International Medical Congress in London; 2000 + doctors from all parts of the world Aug. 3, 1881 + + 73--Greenwich Observatory changed mode of reckoning + time; commencing at midnight as in the case of + civil time Jan. 1, 1885 + + 74--First complete copy of Revised Bible presented + to H. M. The Queen May 15, 1885 + + 75--Sixpenny Telegrams introduced Oct. 1, 1885 + + 76--By Pope's special authority the Queen visits the + Monastery of the Grande Chartreuse Apr. 23, 1887 + + 77--Queen's Jubilee; 50th Anniversary June 20, 1887 + + 78--The "Times" Newspaper celebrates its 100th + Anniversary Jan. 1, 1888 + + 79--First of 10 victims of "Jack the Ripper," + Whitechapel, London Aug. 29, 1888 + + =80=--Henry Irving, Miss Terry and Lyceum Co., play at + Sandringham, before the Queen, Royal Family and + Guests Apr. 26, 1889 + + 81--Lord Mayor of London, Cardinal Manning and + Bishop of London, constitute a Board of + Conciliation in the great Dock Strike Sept. 5, 1889 + + 82--Sir E. Guinness gives L250,000 for the erection + of dwellings for the poor of London and Dublin Nov. 19, 1889 + + 83--Great Speech of Sir William Harcourt on Free + Education in Scotland Aug. 1, 1890 + + 84--Death of Cardinal Newman Aug. 11, 1890 + + 85--Funeral of Charles Bradlaugh Feb. 3, 1891 + + 86--Loss of s.s. "Utopia," off Gibraltar, 600 lives + lost Mar. 17, 1891 + + 87--International Postal Congress May 23, 1891 + + 88--Meeting of Imperial Federation League June 19, 1891 + + 89--Primrose League Demonstration at Hatfield July 18, 1891 + + =90=--Meeting in connection with University Extension + of Education, held in Oxford Aug. 6, 1891 + + 91--International Agricultural Congress reject + nationalization of land Sept.11, 1891 + + 92--Mr. Lidderdale and the Baring Liquidation Sept.17, 1891 + + 93--Publication of Koch's new remedy for + Tuberculosis Oct. 22, 1891 + + 94--Centenary of Mozart's death observed in England Dec. 5, 1891 + + 95--Indian national congress opened Dec. 27, 1891 + + 96--The Khedive of Egypt appointed a new Cabinet + without consulting the British Government. The + next day he dismissed it under British pressure Jan. 17, 1893 + + 97--The Australian Joint Stock Bank failed for + L13,000,000 sterling Apr. 20, 1893 + + 98--The House of Lords rejected the Home Rule Bill Sept. 8, 1893 + + 99--Professor Tyndall died from an overdose of + chloral administered in mistake by his wife Dec. 4, 1893 + +=100=--Lord Salisbury attacks Darwinianism in his + address before the British Association Aug. 8, 1894 + + +ANALYSIS OF ONE HUNDRED EVENTS OF THE VICTORIAN ERA. + +=1 and 2--Con. and In.=--The Victorian Era began June 20, 1837, and an + Act for the abolition of the death penalty for forgery, &c., was + passed nearly a month later. Here is the relation of Sequence or + Con. The main motive for enacting the law was doubtless sympathy. + Death appeared to be too cruel for the crime; hence the _sympathy_ + on the part of the Sovereign, the founder of the Era, and of the + legislators brought the Act into existence. Here we have the + relation of Simple Inclusion. + +=2 and 3--Ex.=--Criminals try to live by their wits, without work. The + trade unionists live by labour. The modes of livelihood of these + two classes are opposed. Hence it is Ex. + +=3 and 4--In. and Ex.=--Trades union people and navigators are + laborers.--Here is In. But the former work mostly at home or in + their own country, and the sailors are engaged beyond the + boundaries of their native country.--Here is Ex. from difference + of locality. + +=4 and 5--In.=--The sailors on the Great Western worked beyond the + limits of their native country, and an International Copyright Law + extends its influence even into the area of foreign lands. In the + view of the sphere of operation these two cases contain an element + in common.--Hence it is In. + +=5 and 6--Ex.=--The International Copyright Law was enacted after long + and earnest agitation--but all legal.--The Chartist agitators had + to be suppressed. Here are conditions opposed to each other.--It + is Ex. + +=6 and 7--Ex.=--The Chartist agitation was extreme, and was proclaimed + illegal. The Anti-Corn Law League acted prudently and within the + law. Here again are opposed conditions. It is Ex. + +=7 and 8--In.=--The Anti-Corn Law League was organised to help give + cheap food to the masses. The Penny Postage Act was enacted to + help the poor man, to save expense. A similar aim prompted the + supporters of both measures.--It is In. + +=8 and 9--Ex.=--Favouring the masses by cheap postage calls attention to + the majority or the great body of the people. The marriage of the + highest dignitaries of the State directs attention to the most + favoured or exalted personages in the country. The extremes of the + community are brought into relation. It is Ex. + +=9 and 10--Con. and In.=--Parents and child is a Sequence. Hence Con. + and a child possessing the blood of his parents sustains the + relation also of In. to them. Let the pupil pause here, and before + his next session of study of these events, let him recite these + ten backwards and forwards several times from memory. + +=10 and 11--In.=--Brother and sister possessing in common the blood of + their parents is a case of In. + +=11 and 12--Ex.=--Here is a birth contrasted with a death.--It is Ex. + +=12 and 13--Ex.=--Death on the one hand and on the other a widespread + effort to bring into existence Acts of Parliament. + Self-destruction contrasted with efforts at production. + +=13 and 14--In.=--Here are two winners and two losers. The parties + opposed to Chartists defeat the hearing of this proposed motion; + and the British soldiers gain a victory over the Boers. Success in + common makes a case of In. on the part of the victorious parties. + And then the Chartists lost their proposed hearing and the Boers + were beaten. This is the second In. + +=14 and 15--Ex.=--A resort to arms contrasted with a resort to + diplomacy. + +=15 and 16--Ex.=--A treaty between the two greatest nations of the + earth, and loss of 10,000 men. A triumph of Peace and a triumph in + War. + +=16 and 17--Ex.=--The death of a multitude of soldiers and a birth in + the highest family of the realm. + +=17 and 18--Ex. and In.=--A birth and a death gives Ex. A _royal_ birth + with all the advantages it brings, and the advantage of the + inheritance of great fortunes, makes a clear case of In. + +=18 and 19--Ex. and In.=--Similar relations to those spoken of in the + last paragraph. + +=19 and 20--Ex.=--To the taxpayer the endowment of the Duke of Edinburgh + might seem to be a burden imposed--and the abolition of + imprisonment for debt below L20, would be looked upon as a burden + removed. Here we have Ex. + +As before suggested, let the pupil recite the foregoing ten events +forwards and the reverse way several times from memory. And then let him +similarly recite the entire twenty events. + +=20 and 21--In.=--Favoring poor people--debtors and poor + students--characterises both events. + +=21 and 22--In.=--This college among other things prosecuted the study + of Philosophy--"the complete unification of knowledge"--Faraday + _unified_ three elements. + +=22 and 23--In.=--Light, heat and electricity arise from latency to + manifestation--a physical birth--here, too, is the birth of an + organism. + +=23 and 24--In.=--Beginning of two careers--one of an individual and the + other of a body of persons. + +=24 and 25--Ex.=--Object and aims different--one was a promotion of + science--new science--highest science--the other was reverence for + old literature--greatest of all literatures. + +=25 and 26--Ex.=--Liberal outlay of money in art circles--great scarcity + in business. + +=26 and 27--Ex.=--Anguish and suffering unallayed--pain neutralized. + +=27 and 28--Ex.=--Suppression of individual feeling--society's outburst. + +=28 and 29--In.=--Explosion of seething elements--a new nation--royal + birth. + +=29 and 30--In. and Ex.=--Nation protects Royal child--a foreigner seeks + same protection. + +=30 and 31--In. and Ex.=--Treaty between State and individual--treaty + between States. + +=31 and 32--Ex.=--Canal transportation comparatively safe--horseback + riding liable to accidents. + +=32 and 33--In.=--Farewell to life--farewell to stage. + +=33 and 34--Ex.=--Close of one kind of exhibition and opening of + another. + +=34 and 35--Ex.=--Peaceful industries triumph--usurpation by intrigue + and blood. + +=35 and 36--Ex. and In.=--Beginning of one career and close of + another--a trampler on laws; a respecter of them. + +=36 and 37--Ex.=--Great General's death; royal birth. + +=37 and 38--Ex.=--Life and choleraic deaths feared. + +=38 and 39--In.=--Rebuke of religious zeal--dismissal for opinion's + sake. + +=39 and 40--In.=--A cleric dismissed and a war declared--"Intolerance" + in both cases. + +=40 and 41--In.=--Two declarations of war. + +=41 and 42--Ex.=--Ravages of war contrasted with intellectual triumphs + of peace--brute force and advanced thinking. + +=42 and 43--Con.=--Philosophy and peace--high thinking and the + conditions on which it can be carried on--co-existence. + +=43 and 44--Con.=--Peace and its celebrations, cause and effect. + +=44 and 45--In.=--General rejoicing and rejoicing in royal family. + +=45 and 46--Ex.=--Life and bloody deaths. + +=46 and 47--Ex.=--Forcible seizure and legal separation, capture and + discharge. + +=47 and 48--Ex.=--Marriage failures and honoring Newton's successes. + +=48 and 49--Ex. and In.=--Honoring old science--publishing new science. + +=49 and 50--Ex.=--Beginning of scientific reputation--close of literary + life. + +=50 and 51--In. and Ex.=--Two deaths make In.--and one from natural + causes and the other from violence, we have Ex. + +=51 and 52--Ex.=--Violence externally applied kills the boy--but ships + shielded from violence by its ironclad covering. It is Ex. + +=52 and 53--In. and Con.=--Interest in war and befriending a + belligerent, coexistence of war improvement, and favouring a + warlike people. + +=53 and 54--Ex.=--Coming into existence (recognition) and death of a + high personage. + +=54 and 55--Con. and Ex.=--Father and son is Con.--death and marriage as + the condition of life. + +=55 and 56--In.=--Marriage festivities and celebration of Shakespeare's + birth--both rejoicings. + +=56 and 57--In. and Ex.=--Both tercentenaries, and one reckons from + birth and the other from death. + +=57 and 58--In. and Ex.=--Tercentenary ceremonies, and dedication of a + statue to Sir William Jenner--one tried to save souls, the other + to save life. + +=58 and 59--In.=--A statue and a medal--honour in both cases. + +=59 and 60--In.=--One tried to save life, the other alleviated its + sufferings. + +=60 and 61--In.=--Gifts to the poor in a lump--buying telegraph to + cheapen cost of messages to the great mass of community. + +=61 and 62--In.=--Extension of telegraphs, ultimately to the benefit of + all--extension of medical education to women. + +=62 and 63--In.=--Rights of women and of the poor--beneficence to poor + and charity to women. + +=63 and 64--Con.=--Common prisons abound in dust and germs--these latter + are propagators of disease. + +=64 and 65--In. and Con.=--Germs cause typhoid and other + diseases--Prince of Wales attacked by typhoid. + +=65 and 66--Ex.=--Typhoid tends to destroy; awards build up. + +=66 and 67--In. and Ex.=--Fast steamer Alabama, and fast woman walker, + speed with injury--and innocent speed. + +=67 and 68--Ex.=--Walking on land and safe swimming in water. + +=68 and 69--In.=--Floating in water and electric lighting of + museum--protection to life--and comfort to life. + +=69 and 70--Ex.=--Lighted museum--and dark night at the Tay--light and + safety--and darkness and death. + +=70 and 71--In.=--Many deaths in Bridge disaster and one distinguished + person dies. + +=71 and 72--Ex.=--One person dies and medics strive to prevent death. + +=72 and 73--In. and Ex.=--Medical improvement and improvement in + reckoning time--doctors from abroad--and observatory stationary. + +=73 and 74--In.=--Improved time reckoning--and revised and improved form + of Bible. + +=74 and 75--In. and Ex.=--Gift to highest personage and cheap telegrams + for masses--favours to both. + +=75 and 76--In. and Ex.=--Head of English nation and head of Catholic + church--favour to the Queen and favour to the people. + +=76 and 77--In.=--One concession to Queen--and people's jubilee on + account of Queen--good will in both cases. + +=77 and 78--In. and Ex.=--Queen's jubilee and Times' jubilee, sovereign + and subjects. + +=78 and 79--Con.=--Universal reporter of good and bad things--worst + possible murder. + +=79 and 80--Ex.=--Horror and amusement. + +=80 and 81--Ex.=--Players for Royalty and great arbitrators for + labouring men. + +=81 and 82--In.=--Strike of poor labourers, and houses for the poor. + +=82 and 83--In. and Ex.=--Gifts to poor and education for them--physical + benefits and mental benefit. + +=83 and 84--In. and Ex.=--Intellectual education and spiritual + education--living scholars and death of a great teacher. + +=84 and 85--In. and Ex.=--Two deaths--and opposite beliefs--In. as to + death and Ex. as to opinions. + +=85 and 86--In.=--Death of one man--and death of six hundred--In. + +=86 and 87--Ex.=--A dead multitude and a living congress. + +=87 and 88--In.=--Two congresses. + +=88 and 89--In.=--Imperialism--and party self-assertion. + +=89 and 90--In.=--Political agitation--educational agitation. + +=90 and 91--Ex.=--Extension of education--refusal to extend Government + sway over land. + +=91 and 92--In.=--Land not lost individuals--and bank saved. + +=92 and 93--In. and Ex.=--Saving a bank and effort to save life--bank + saved--but consumptives lost. + +=93 and 94--In. and Ex.=--Rejoicing over supposed antidote to + consumptive deaths--and music jubilee over death of Mozart. + +=94 and 95--Ex.=--Death and birth of congress. + +=95 and 96--Ex.=--A congress meets and a cabinet dissolves. + +=96 and 97--In.=--A cabinet failed and a bank failed. + +=97 and 98--In.=--Bank failure and Home Rule bill defeated. + +=98 and 99--In. and Ex.=--Bill killed intentionally--a man killed + accidentally. + +=99 and 100--In. and Ex.=--Fatal attack of poison--unsuccessful attack + on Darwinianism. + +As to the dates of the 100 events, they will cause no difficulty. The +pupil should look upon my formulas as models merely, and make his own +whenever possible. In all the events belonging to this century, we have +only to deal with the last two figures--(3) {M}odel (7) {Q}ueen gives +the date of (18)37. The rule in regard to the month and the day of the +month is very easily applied. A separate word for each figure except for +the three months [October, November and December] where there are two +figures in the one word that expresses the number of the month, as +{t}ie{s}, {d}ue{s}, '{t}i{s}, {th}u{s}, {th}i{s}, {th}o{s}e, express +October, the tenth month; {th}a{t}, {d}i{d}, {d}ie{d}, {d}o{t}, {d}a{t}e, +{t}hough{t}, &c., &c., indicate November, the eleventh month; and +{th}e{n}, {th}i{n}, {t}o{n}e, {t}u{n}e, a{t}tai{n}, &c., &c., mean +December, the twelfth month. A {M}odel {Q}ueen {J}ust i{n} {s}eason--Just +in its "J" means the sixth month, or {J}une, and "n" in "i{n}" and "s" +in {s}eason means a cypher--or 20--the translation of the phrase is +(18)37--June--20th day + + --(2) A{m}ending a {c}ode {g}ives {t}rue {c}aution + = (18)37--July--17th + + --(3) {M}aking {f}riends i{n}side {th}e {m}agnates + = (18)38--February 13 + + --(4) A{m}idship {V}oyager {sh}ows {d}ouble {g}eering + = (18)38--June--17 + + --(5) {M}utual {F}airness {g}ives {m}ultiplied {d}issemination + = (18)38--July--31 + + --(6) {M}eetings {f}orbidden {t}o{n}e {d}own {n}oise + = (18)38--Dec.--12 + + --(7) {M}eal a {f}avorite {th}e{n} {t}ook {p}recedence + = (18)38--December--19 + + --(8) A {m}issive {p}enny {f}avors {th}e {c}ommonality + = (18)39--August--17 + + --(9) A {R}oyal {C}ementing i{n} {th}e {s}anctuary + = (18)40--February--10th + + --(10) A {R}oyal {S}pinster [or {c}elebrity] {d}i{d} i{n}vite + {d}estiny = (18)40--November--21 + + --(11) {R}oyal E{d}ward {d}i{d} a{p}pear = (18)41--Nov.--9th + + --(12) Ea{r}l's u{n}doing {m}anifested i{n}sane {s}uicide + = (18)42--March--20th + + --(13) {R}egistered {n}ames wi{l}l e{n}thuse = (18)42--May--2 + + --(14) {R}epressing {N}atalites {l}eft {n}o {ch}ange + = (18)42--May--26 + + --(15) {R}ebinding {N}ations {f}avored {p}atriotism + = (18)42--August--9 + + --(16) {R}educing A{m}eers {t}ook {d}etermined {sh}ooting + = (18)43--January--16 + + --(17) {R}oyal {M}ary {r}ightly {n}amed A{l}ice = (18)43--April--25 + + --(18) A{r}kwright's {m}illions wi{l}l e{n}rich hei{r}s + = (18)43--May--24 + + --(19) {R}oyal E{r}nest; a {f}avored {ch}ild = (18)44--August--6 + + --(20) {R}eleasing a{r}rears {f}avored {d}ebtor's {s}entences + = (18)44--August--10 + + --(21) {R}eligious I{l}liberalities wi{l}l {d}estroy {ch}arity + = (18)45--May--16 + + --(22) A {r}eal {l}ikeness {t}ha{t} {l}inks = (18)45--Nov.--5 + + --(23) A {r}oyal {ch}ild--He{l}ena--{n}ow {l}aughs = (18)46--May--25 + + --(24) {R}eading whi{ch} {d}i{d} {r}ationalize = (18)46--Nov.--4 + + --(25) A hoa{r}y {c}ottage {b}ought {t}oo {ch}eap = (18)47--Sept.--16 + + --(26) A {r}ate {c}ausing {th}ose {m}erchants {d}istress + = (18)47--Oct.--31 + + --(27) {R}elieving {ch}loroform {t}ha{t} {d}rugs {n}erves + = (18)47--Nov.--12 + + --(28) {R}evolutionizing {F}renchmen i{n}dicated a {n}ew {n}ation + = (18)48--Feb.--22 + + --(29) A {r}oyal {f}airy {m}aiden {d}evelops {f}ancy--(she is an + artist) = (18)48--March--18 + + --(30) O{r}atorical {p}rayers {p}rocure {n}ational {s}ecurity + = (18)49--Sept.--20 + + --(31) A {l}awful {s}cheme a{r}ouses {t}opmost {p}atronage + = (18)50--April--19 + + --(32) A {l}uckless {s}tumble {k}illed a {n}obleman = (18)50--July--2 + + --(33) Wi{l}liam's wi{th}drawal e{n}ded {n}umerous {ch}arms + = (18)51--Feb.--26 + + --(34) {V}ictoria we{l}comes {th}e Ha{l}l {t}o-day = (1)851--May--1 + + --(35) {L}ouis' au{d}acity {th}e{n} a{n}nounced = (18)51--Dec.--2 + + --(36) We{l}lington's e{n}d {b}rought {d}ue {r}ecognition + = (18)52--Sept.--14 + + --(37) {L}eopold {m}ildly {r}aises a {c}ry = (18)53--April--7 + + --(38) A {l}ord's {m}essage {d}oes {t}each a {P}resbytery + = (18)53--Oct.--19 + + --(39) {L}earned {M}aurice {t}eaches u{n}welcome {c}reeds + = (18)53--Oct.--27 + + --(40) A {l}urid {m}anifesto {th}a{t} {th}reatened = (18)53--Nov.--1 + + --(41) A {L}awful {R}uler {m}enaces {n}ew a{n}tagonisms + = (18)54--March--22 + + --(42) No month or day of month being given, we will express three + figures thus: E{v}olution's {l}aws i{l}lustrated = (1)855 + + --(43) A{l}liances {j}oined {m}ean {m}anifest {s}ecurity + = (18)56--March--30 + + --(44) {L}isteners {ch}armed a{r}ound {th}e {m}usic + = (18)56--April--13 + + --(45) A {l}ucky {g}irl he{r}e a{t}tains {r}oyalty + = (18)57--April--14 + + --(46) A {l}awless {c}onspiracy {b}eaten i{n} {S}eptember + = (18)57--Sept.--20 + + --(47) {L}oosening {f}amilies {d}estroys {th}e {ch}ildren + = (18)58--January--16 + + --(48) A {L}ifeless {f}igure {p}ictures {N}ewton's i{d}entity + = (18)58--Sept.--21 + + --(49) No month or day being given, we may express the complete date: + {D}arwinianism {f}ormulates {l}egitimate {b}iology = 1859 + + --(50) {L}ifeless {B}abington {th}e{n} e{n}tered a {v}ault + = (18)59--Dec--28 + + --(51) A {sh}ameless {s}choolmaster's {c}ruelty {n}ow {m}urders, or a + {s}choolmaster's {s}entence {c}auses {n}o {m}ercy = + (18)60--July--23 + + --(52) {S}hielding ou{t}sides {m}ay {d}efy a{t}tack + = (18)61--March--11 + + --(53) {Ch}ivalry {d}elighted, wi{l}l {f}ight = (18)61--May--8 + + --(54) {Sh}edding {t}ears {t}ha{t} {t}ear hea{r}ts + = (18)61--Nov.--14--or {V}ictoria {s}hed {t}ears = (1)861 + + --(55) A {j}oyful {m}arriage {m}ay ai{d} {s}overeignty + = (18)63--March--10 + + --(56) {Sh}akespeare's {r}eign {r}eturns o{n}ce {m}ore + = (18)64--April--23 + + --(57) A {j}ustifiable {r}evival wi{l}l e{n}dorse {C}alvin + = (18)64--May--27 + + --(58) {J}enner's {l}ikeness {p}leases {d}octors = (18)65--Sept.--1 + + --(59) A {ch}artered {j}ewel {m}eans {c}apture = (18)66--March--7 + + --(60) {G}enerosity's {ch}ampion {m}anifests u{n}usual {f}aith + = (18)66--March--28--or {G}enerosity's {ch}ampion {m}arkedly + e{n}thused {V}ictoria = (18)66--March--28 + + --(61) {S}ure {f}orwarders {g}ain {m}ultitudinous {t}elegraphs + = (18)68--July--31 + + --(62) {Ch}arming {p}ractitioners {d}ose u{n}easy a{ch}es + = (18)69--Oct.--27 + + --(63) {C}reditors {s}cold {th}e {d}ebtors = (18)70--January--1 + + --(64) {C}ontagion {s}preads {th}rough {th}e ai{r} + = (18)70--January--14 + + --(65) A {k}inglet's {t}yphoid {th}at e{n}ded {m}arvellously + = (18)71--Nov.--23 + + --(66) {G}reat (Britain) i{m}mediately {p}aid {th}e awa{r}d + = (18)73--Sept.--14 + + --(67) {C}ourageous {R}ichards {sh}owed u{n}usual {p}edestrianism + = (18)74--June--29 + + --(68) A {C}aptain's {l}ivery wi{l}l e{n}sure {f}loating + = (18)75--May--28 + + --(69) A {c}urrent's {b}rightness {d}oes e{n}rich eye{s}ight + = (18)79--Oct.--20 + + --(70) A {C}rippled {B}ridge {th}e{n} i{n}stantly {f}ell + = (18)79--Dec.--28 + + --(71) A {f}emale {s}cribe {d}ie{d} i{n} {N}ovember--(18)80--Nov.--22 + + --(72) {F}oreign {d}octors {f}ormulate {m}edicine = (18)81--Aug.--3 + + --(73) {F}ixing {l}imits {t}o {t}ime = (18)85--January--1 + + --(74) {V}ictoria {l}earns Ho{l}y {T}estaments we{l}l + = (18)85--May--15 + + --(75) Hal{v}ing e{l}ectrics {d}oubles {t}elegraphing + = (18)85--Oct.--1 + + --(76) {V}ictoria--{Q}ueen {r}eally e{n}ters a {m}onastery + = (18)87--April--23 + + --(77) {V}ictorian {c}ongratulations {sh}ow e{n}lightened {s}ubjects + = (18)87--June--20 + + --(78) A {F}act {f}inder {d}rinks {t}oasts = (18)88--January--1 + + --(79) {F}emale {v}ictims o{f} u{n}natural {b}utchery + = (18)88--August--29 + + --(80) {V}ictoria a{p}plauds I{r}ving's {n}umerous {ch}armers + = (18)89--April--26 + + --(81) A {f}amous {B}oard {b}rought a{l}leviation = (18)89--Sept.--5 + + --(82) {F}urnishing {b}uildings {d}i{d} {d}elight {p}aupers + = (18)89--Nov.--19 + + --(83) A {b}ig {s}peech {f}or e{d}ucation = (18)90--Aug.--1 + + --(84) A {p}riest {s}urrenders a{f}ter {th}eological {t}oil + = (18)90--Aug.--11 + + --(85) {B}radlaugh {d}ies i{n} {m}ockery or {B}radlaugh's {d}eath + {n}ow {m}ourned = (18)91--Feb.--3 + + --(86) {P}erishing "U{t}opia" {m}eans a wa{t}ery {g}rave + = (18)91--March--17 + + --(87) {P}ostal {d}elegates wi{l}l i{n}augurate {m}ethods + = (18)91--May--23 + + --(88) {B}ritish {d}omination {g}enerates {t}rue {p}atriotism + = (18)91--June--19 + + --(89) {P}rimrose {d}emonstration {g}ave Ha{t}field {f}lattery + = (18)91--July--18 + + --(90) {P}ushing e{d}ucation {f}or {ch}ildren = (18)91--Aug.--6 + + --(91) {P}ublic {t}itles {p}ublicly {th}rown {d}own + = (18)91--Sept.--11 + + --(92) {B}aring's {d}ues {p}aid {th}e {c}reditors = (18)91--Sept.--17 + + --(93) {P}ublishing {t}uberculosis {d}oes i{n}vite i{n}vestigation + = (18)91--Oct.--22 + + --(94) {B}ooming {t}unes {th}e{n} {l}uxuriated = (18)91--Dec.--5 + + --(95) O{p}ening {d}ays {th}i{n} I{n}dian {C}ongress + = (18)91--Dec.--27 + + --(96) A {B}ritish {m}inistry {d}etermine {th}e {K}hedive + = (18)93--January--17 + + --(97) {B}ank {m}ismanagement {r}uins {n}umerous {s}ubscribers + = (18)93--April--20 + + --(98) A {B}ill {m}ade {P}eers a{f}raid = (18)93--Sept.--8 + + --(99) A {P}rofessor's "{M}rs." {th}e{n} e{r}red = (18)93--Dec.--4--, + or giving the year alone we say: {T}yndall's Wi{f}e {b}ecame a + {m}ind-wanderer or {T}yndall's Wi{f}e {p}oisoned hi{m} = 1893 + +--(100) {D}arwinianism {f}avors {b}iological {r}idicule = 1894--, or + {B}iological {r}esearches {f}avors {f}ault-finding + = (18)94--August--8. + + +A CONCLUDING REMARK. + +If the pupil has painstakingly reviewed this entire work, let him for +the next three months, whenever he wishes to fix anything in mind, not +apply the methods of the system to it, but concentrate his thoughts upon +it with the utmost intensity so that his improved power of assimilation +will seize upon it with an unreleasing grasp, and, then, when the three +months period has passed, he will find that he has consolidated the +Habit of Attention and Memory. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Assimilative Memory, by +Marcus Dwight Larrowe (AKA Prof. A. Loisette) + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ASSIMILATIVE MEMORY *** + +***** This file should be named 25354.txt or 25354.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/5/3/5/25354/ + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
