143 files changed, 20795 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/22471-8.txt b/22471-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9df5d72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6855 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch
+Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch Valley, 1769-1784
+       A Study of Frontier Ethnography
+
+Author: George D. Wolf
+
+Release Date: August 31, 2007 [EBook #22471]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+                    _The Fair Play Settlers
+                   of the West Branch Valley,
+                           1769-1784:
+                A Study of Frontier Ethnography_
+
+
+
+                               BY
+                         GEORGE D. WOLF
+
+
+
+                  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
+                  THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL
+                     AND MUSEUM COMMISSION
+
+                        Harrisburg, 1969
+
+
+
+
+                  THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL
+                     AND MUSEUM COMMISSION
+
+
+                 JAMES B. STEVENSON, _Chairman_
+
+                CHARLES G. WEBB, _Vice Chairman_
+
+ HERMAN BLUM                   MRS. FERNE SMITH HETRICK
+
+ MARK S. GLEESON               MRS. HENRY P. HOFFSTOT, JR.
+
+ RALPH HAZELTINE               MAURICE A. MOOK
+
+                      THOMAS ELLIOTT WYNNE
+
+                 DAVID H. KURTZMAN, _ex officio
+             Superintendent of Public Instruction_
+
+
+               MEMBERS FROM THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
+
+             MRS. SARAH ANDERSON, _Representative_
+
+ PAUL W. MAHADY, _Senator_     ORVILLE E. SNARE, _Representative_
+
+                  JOHN H. WARE, III, _Senator_
+
+
+                      TRUSTEES EX OFFICIO
+
+       RAYMOND P. SHAFER, _Governor of the Commonwealth_
+
+               ROBERT P. CASEY, _Auditor General_
+
+               GRACE M. SLOAN, _State Treasurer_
+
+
+                      ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
+
+          SYLVESTER K. STEVENS, _Executive Director_
+
+         WILLIAM J. WEWER, _Deputy Executive Director_
+
+                   DONALD H. KENT, _Director
+                Bureau of Archives and History_
+
+                  FRANK J. SCHMIDT, _Director
+            Bureau of Historic Sites and Properties_
+
+                 WILLIAM N. RICHARDS, _Director
+                       Bureau of Museums_
+
+
+
+
+_Preface_
+
+
+In an Age when man's horizons are constantly being widened to include
+hitherto little-known or non-existent countries, and even other planets
+and outer space, there is still much to be said for the oft-neglected
+study of man in his more immediate environs. Intrigued with the
+historical tale of the "Fair Play settlers" of the West Branch Valley of
+the Susquehanna River and practically a life-long resident of the West
+Branch Valley, this writer felt that their story was worth telling and
+that it might offer some insight into the development of democracy on
+the frontier. The result is an ethnography of the Fair Play settlers.
+This account, however, is not meant to typify the frontier experience;
+it is simply an illustration, and, the author hopes, a useful one.
+
+No intensive research can be conducted without the help and
+encouragement of many fine and wonderful people. This author is deeply
+indebted to librarians, archivists and historians, local historians and
+genealogists, local and county historical societies, and collectors of
+manuscripts, diaries, and journals pertinent to the history of the West
+Branch Valley. A comprehensive listing of all who have assisted in this
+effort would be too extensive, but certain persons cannot be ignored. My
+grateful appreciation is here expressed to a few of these; but my
+gratitude is no less sincere to the many persons who are not here
+mentioned.
+
+Librarians who have been most helpful in providing bibliographies,
+checking files, and obtaining volumes from other libraries include Miss
+Isabel Welch, of the Ross Library in Lock Haven; Mrs. Kathleen Chandler,
+formerly of the Lock Haven State College library; and Miss Barbara Ault,
+of the Library of Congress.
+
+Archivists and historians who have been most generous in their aid are
+the late Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, of the Pennsylvania Historical and
+Museum Commission; Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, of Collegeville; Dr. Alfred
+P. James, of the University of Pittsburgh; and Mrs. Solon J. Buck, of
+Washington, D. C.
+
+Perhaps the most significant research support for this investigation was
+provided by a local historian and genealogist, Mrs. Helen Herritt
+Russell, of Jersey Shore.
+
+Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, of the Pennsylvania State University, analyzed the
+Fair Play settlers using linguistic techniques to determine their
+national origins. This help was basic to the demographic portion of this
+study.
+
+Dr. Charles F. Berkheimer and Mrs. Marshall Anspach, both of
+Williamsport, magnanimously consented to loan this author their copies,
+respectively, of William Colbert's _Journal_ and the Wagner Collection
+of Revolutionary War Pension Claims.
+
+County and local historical societies which opened their collections for
+study were the Clinton County Historical Society, the Lycoming
+Historical Society, the Northumberland County Historical Society, the
+Centre County Historical Society, the Greene County Historical Society,
+and the Muncy Historical Society and Museum of History.
+
+For his refreshing criticisms and constant encouragement, Dr. Murray G.
+Murphey, of the University of Pennsylvania, will find me forever
+thankful. Without him, this study would not have been possible.
+
+The author would like to thank the members of the Pennsylvania
+Historical and Museum Commission and its Executive Director, Dr. S. K.
+Stevens, for making possible this publication; he would also like to
+thank Mr. Donald H. Kent, Director of the Bureau of Archives and
+History, and Mr. William A. Hunter, Chief of the Division of History,
+who supervised publication; and members of the staff of the Division of
+History: Mr. Harold L. Myers, Associate Historian and Chief of the
+Editorial Section, who readied the manuscript for publication; Mrs. Gail
+M. Gibson, Associate Historian, who prepared the index; and Mr. George
+R. Beyer, Assistant Historian.
+
+My sincerest thanks are also extended to Mrs. Mary B. Bower, who typed
+the entire manuscript and offered useful suggestions with regard to
+style.
+
+Finally, for providing almost ideal conditions for carrying on this work
+and for sustaining me throughout, my wife, Margaret, is deserving of a
+gratitude which cannot be fully expressed.
+
+                                        GEORGE D. WOLF
+
+
+
+
+_Introduction_
+
+
+Between 1769 and 1784, in an area some twenty-five miles long and about
+two miles wide, located on the north side of the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River and extending from Lycoming Creek (at the present
+Williamsport) to the Great Island (just east of the present Lock Haven),
+some 100 to 150 families settled. They established a community and a
+political organization called the Fair Play system. This study is about
+these people and their system.
+
+The author of a recent case study of democracy in a frontier county
+commented on the need for this kind of investigation.[1] Cognizant of
+the fact that a number of valuable histories of American communities
+have been written, he noted that few of them deal explicitly with the
+actual relation of frontier experience to democracy:
+
+    No one seems to have studied microscopically a given area that
+    experienced transition from wilderness to settled community with the
+    purpose of determining how much democracy, in Turner's sense,
+    existed initially in the first phase of settlement, during the
+    process itself, and in the period that immediately followed.
+
+This research encompasses the first two stages of that development and
+includes tangential references to the third stage.
+
+The geography of the Fair Play territory has been confused for almost
+two centuries. The conclusions of this analysis will not prove too
+satisfying to those who unquestioningly accept and revere the old local
+legends. However, it will be noted that these conclusions are based upon
+the accounts of journalists and diarists rather than hearsay. This
+should put the controversial "question of the Tiadaghton" to rest.
+
+A statistical analysis has been made as a significant part of the
+demography of the Fair Play settlers. However, limitations in data may
+raise some questions regarding the validity of the conclusions.
+Nevertheless, the national and ethnic origins of these settlers, their
+American sources of emigration, the periods of immigration, the reasons
+for migration, and population stability and mobility have all been
+investigated. The result offers some surprises when compared with the
+trends of the time--in the Province and throughout the colonies.
+
+The _politics_ of Fair Play is the principal concern of this entire
+study--appropriately, it was from their political system that these
+frontiersmen derived their unusual name. This was not the only group to
+use the name, however. Another "fair play system" existed in
+southwestern Pennsylvania during the same period, and perhaps a similar
+study can be made of those pioneers and their life. As for the Fair Play
+community of the West Branch, we know about its political structure
+through the cases subsequently reviewed by established courts of the
+Commonwealth. From these cases, we have reconstructed a "code" of
+operation which demonstrates certain democratic tendencies.
+
+In addition to studying the political system, an effort has been made to
+validate the story of the locally-famed Pine Creek Declaration of
+Independence. Although some evidence for such a declaration was found,
+it seems inconclusive.
+
+The West Branch Valley was part of what Turner called the second
+frontier, the Allegheny, and so this agrarian frontier community has
+been examined for evidence of the democratic traits which Turner
+characterized as particularly American. This analysis is not meant to
+portray a typical situation, but it does provide support for Turner's
+evaluation. As this was a farmer's frontier, and as transportation and
+communication facilities were extremely limited, a generally
+self-sufficient and naturally self-reliant community developed as a
+matter of survival. The characteristics which this frontier nurtured,
+and the non-English--even anti-English--composition of its population
+make understandable the sentiment in this region for independence from
+Great Britain. This, of course, is supremely demonstrated in the
+separate declaration of independence drawn, according to the report, by
+the settlers of the Fair Play frontier.
+
+Fair Play _society_ is, perhaps, the second-most-important facet of this
+ethnographic analysis. An understanding of it necessitated an inquiry
+into the social relationships, the religious institutions, the
+educational and cultural opportunities, and the values of this frontier
+community. The results, again, lend credence to Turner's hypothesis.
+Admittedly, Turner's bold assertion that "the growth of nationalism and
+the evolution of American political institutions were dependent on the
+advance of the frontier" is somewhat contradicted by the nature of this
+Pennsylvania frontier. Western lands in Pennsylvania were either
+Provincial, Commonwealth, or Indian lands, but never national lands. As
+a result, western land ordinances, and the whole controversy which
+accompanied the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, had no
+real significance in Pennsylvania. However, in subsequent years, the
+expansion of internal improvement legislation and nationalism sustains
+Turner's thesis, as does the democratic and non-sectional nature of the
+middle colonial region generally.[2]
+
+The _intellectual character_ which the frontier spawned has been
+described as rationalistic. However, this was a rationalism which was
+not at odds with empiricism, but which was more in line with what has
+been called the American philosophy, pragmatism. Or, to put it in the
+vernacular, "if it works, it's good." The frontiersman was a
+trial-and-error empiricist, who believed in his own ability to fathom
+the depths of the problems which plagued him. If the apparent solution
+contradicted past patterns and interpretations, he justified his actions
+in terms of the realities of the moment. It is this pragmatic
+ratio-empiricism which we imply when we use the term "rationalistic."
+
+An examination of the role of _leadership_, suggested by the Curti
+study, presents the first summary of this type for the West Branch
+Valley. Here, too, the limited numbers of this frontier population,
+combined with its peculiar tendency to rely upon peripheral residents
+for top leadership, prevents any broad generalizations. The nature of
+its leadership can only be interpreted in terms of this particular group
+in this specific location.
+
+The last two chapters of this study are summary chapters. The first of
+these is an analysis of democracy on one segment of the Pennsylvania
+frontier. Arbitrarily defining democracy, certain objective criteria
+were set up to evaluate it in the Fair Play territory. Political
+democracy was investigated in terms of popular sovereignty, political
+equality, popular consultation, and majority rule, and the political
+system was judged on the basis of these principles. Social democracy
+was ascertained through inquiries concerning religious freedom, the
+social class system, and economic opportunity. The conclusion is that,
+for this frontier at least, democratic tendencies were displayed in
+various contexts.
+
+The final chapter, although relying to a large extent upon Turner's
+great work, is in no way intended to be a critical evaluation of that
+thesis. Its primary objective is to test one interpretation of it
+through a particular analytic technique, ethnographic in nature.
+Frontier ethnography has proved to be a reliable research tool, mainly
+because of its wide scope. It permits conclusions which a strictly
+confined study, given the data limitations of this and other frontier
+areas, would not allow.
+
+Democracy, it is no doubt agreed, is a difficult thing to assess,
+particularly when there are so many conflicting interpretations of it.
+But an examination of it, even in its most primitive stages in this
+country, can give the researcher a glimpse of its fundamentals and its
+effectiveness. In a time when idealists envision a world community based
+upon the self-determination which was basic in this nation's early
+development, it is essential to re-evaluate that principle in terms of
+its earliest American development. If we would enjoy the blessings of
+freedom, we must undergo the fatigue of attempting to understand it.
+
+Some seventy years ago, a great American historian suggested an
+interpretation of the American ethos. Turner's thesis is still being
+debated today, something which I am certain would please its author
+immensely. But what is needed today is not the prolongation of the
+debate as to its validity so much as the investigation of it with newer
+techniques which, it might be added, Turner himself suggested. This is
+the merit of frontier ethnography, and, perhaps, the particular value of
+this study.
+
+To me, Robert Frost implied as much in his wonderful "Stopping by Woods
+on a Snowy Evening." Yes, the "woods" of contemporary history are
+"lovely, dark and deep,
+
+    But I have promises to keep,
+    And miles to go before I sleep,
+    And miles to go before I sleep."
+
+It is hoped that this investigation is the beginning of the answer to
+that promise, but it is well-recognized that there are miles to go.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Merle Curti _et al._, _The Making of an American Community: A Case
+Study of Democracy in a Frontier County_ (Stanford, 1959), p. 3.
+
+[2] _Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of Frederick Jackson Turner_,
+intro. by Ray Allen Billington (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1961), pp.
+52-55.
+
+
+
+
+_Table of Contents_
+
+
+       PREFACE                                         iii
+
+       INTRODUCTION                                      v
+
+    I. FAIR PLAY TERRITORY: GEOGRAPHY AND TOPOGRAPHY     1
+
+   II. THE FAIR PLAY SETTLERS: DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS      16
+
+  III. THE POLITICS OF FAIR PLAY                        30
+
+   IV. THE FARMERS' FRONTIER                            47
+
+    V. FAIR PLAY SOCIETY                                58
+
+   VI. LEADERSHIP AND THE PROBLEMS OF THE FRONTIER      76
+
+  VII. DEMOCRACY ON THE PENNSYLVANIA FRONTIER           89
+
+ VIII. FRONTIER ETHNOGRAPHY AND THE TURNER THESIS      100
+
+       BIBLIOGRAPHY                                    113
+
+       INDEX                                           119
+
+
+
+
+[Map]
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER ONE
+
+_Fair Play Territory: Geography and Topography_
+
+
+The Colonial period of American history has been of primary concern to
+the historian because of its fundamental importance in the development
+of American civilization. What the American pioneers encountered,
+particularly in the interior settlements, was, basically, a frontier
+experience. An ethnographic analysis of one part of the Provincial
+frontier of Pennsylvania indicates the significance of that colonial
+influence. The "primitive agricultural democracy" of this frontier
+illustrates the "style of life" which provided the basis for a
+distinctly "American" culture which emerged from the colonial
+experience.[1]
+
+While this writer's approach is dominantly Turnerian, this study does
+not necessarily contend that this Pennsylvania frontier was typical of
+the general colonial experience, nor that this ethnographic analysis
+presents in microcosm the development of the American ethos. However, on
+this farmer's frontier there was adequate evidence of the composite
+nationality, the self-reliance, the independence, and the nationalistic
+and rationalistic traits which Turner characterized as American.
+
+In his famed essay on "The Significance of the Frontier," Turner saw the
+frontier as the crucible in which the English, Scotch-Irish, and
+Palatine Germans were merged into a new and distinctly American
+nationality, no longer characteristically English.[2] The Pennsylvania
+frontier, with its dominant Scotch-Irish and German influence, is a case
+in point.
+
+The Fair Play territory of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna
+River, the setting for this analysis, was part of what Turner called the
+second frontier, the Allegheny Mountains.[3] Located about ninety miles
+up the Susquehanna from the present State capital at Harrisburg, and
+extending some twenty-five-odd miles westward between the present cities
+of Williamsport and Lock Haven, this territory was the heartland of the
+central Pennsylvania frontier in the decade preceding the American
+Revolution.
+
+The term "Fair Play settlers," used to designate the inhabitants of this
+region, is derived from the extra-legal political system which these
+democratic forerunners set up to maintain order in their developing
+community. Being squatters and, consequently, without the bounds of any
+established political agency, they formed their own government, and
+labeled it "Fair Play."
+
+However, despite the apparent simplicity of the above geographic
+description, the exact boundaries of the Fair Play territory have been
+debated for almost two centuries. Before we can assess the democratic
+traits of the Fair Play settlers, we must first clearly define what is
+meant by the Fair Play territory.
+
+The terminal points in this analysis are 1768 and 1784, the dates of the
+two Indian treaties made at Fort Stanwix (now Rome), New York. The
+former opened up the Fair Play territory to settlement, and the latter
+brought it within the limits of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, thus
+legalizing the _de facto_ political structure which had developed in the
+interim.
+
+According to the treaty of 1768, negotiated by Sir William Johnson with
+the Indians of the Six Nations, the western line of colonial settlement
+was extended from the Allegheny Mountains, previously set by the
+Proclamation of 1763, to a line extending to the mouth of Lycoming
+Creek, which empties into the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. The
+creek is referred to as the Tiadaghton in the original of the treaty.[4]
+The question of whether Pine Creek or Lycoming Creek was the Tiadaghton
+is the first major question of this investigation. The map which faces
+page one outlines the territory in question.
+
+Following the successful eviction of the French in the French and Indian
+War, the American counterpart of the Seven Years' War, the crown sought
+a more orderly westward advance than had been the rule. Heretofore, the
+establishment of frontier settlements had stirred up conflict with the
+Indians and brought frontier pleas to the colonial assemblies for
+military support and protection. The result was greater pressure on the
+already depleted exchequer. The opinion that a more controlled and less
+expensive westward advance could be accomplished is reflected in the
+Royal Proclamation of 1763.
+
+This proclamation has frequently been misinterpreted as a definite
+effort to deprive the colonies of their western lands. The very language
+of the document contradicts this. For example, the expression "for the
+present, and until our further pleasure be known" clearly indicates the
+tentative nature of the proclamation, which was "to prevent [the
+repetition of] such irregularities for the future" with the Indians,
+irregularities which had prompted Pontiac's Rebellion.[5] The orderly
+advancement of this colonial frontier was to be accomplished through
+subsequent treaties with the Indians. The Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768
+is one such example of those treaties.[6]
+
+The term "Fair Play settlers" refers to the residents of the area
+between Lycoming Creek and the Great Island on the north side of the
+West Branch of the Susquehanna River, and to those who interacted with
+them, during the period 1769-1784, when that area was outside of the
+Provincial limits. The appellation stems from the annual designation by
+the settlers of "Fair Play Men," a tribunal of three with
+quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial authority over the residents.
+
+The relevance of the first Stanwix Treaty to the geographic area of this
+study is a matter of the utmost importance. The western boundary of that
+treaty in the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna has been a source of
+some confusion because of the employment of the name "Tiadaghton" in the
+treaty to designate that boundary. The question, quite simply, is
+whether Pine Creek or Lycoming is the Tiadaghton. If Pine Creek is the
+Tiadaghton, an extra-legal political organization would have been
+unnecessary, for the so-called Fair Play settlers of this book would
+have been under Provincial jurisdiction.[7] The designation of Lycoming
+Creek as the Tiadaghton tends to give geographic corroboration for the
+Fair Play system.
+
+First and foremost among the Pine Creek supporters is John Meginness,
+the nineteenth-century historian of the West Branch Valley. His work is
+undoubtedly the most often quoted source of information on the West
+Branch Valley of the Susquehanna, and rightfully so. Although he wrote
+when standards of documentation were lax and relied to an extent upon
+local legendry as related by aged residents, Meginness' views have a
+general validity. However, there is some question regarding his judgment
+concerning the boundary issue.
+
+Quoting directly from the journal of Moravian Bishop Augustus
+Spangenburg, who visited the West Branch Valley in 1745 in the company
+of Conrad Weiser, David Zeisberger, and John Schebosh, Meginness
+describes the Bishop's travel from Montoursville, or Ostonwaken as the
+Indians called it, to the "Limping Messenger," or "Diadachton Creek,"
+where the party camped for the night.[8] It is interesting to note that
+the Moravian journalist refers here to Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton,
+some twenty-three years prior to the purchase at Fort Stanwix, which
+made the question a local issue. Yet Meginness, in a footnote written
+better than a hundred years later, says that "It afterwards turned out
+that the true _Diadachton_ or _Tiadachton_, was what is now known as
+Pine Creek."[9]
+
+Perhaps Meginness was influenced by the aged sources of some of his
+accounts. It may be, however, that he was merely repeating the judgment
+of an earlier generation which had sought to legalize its settlement
+made prior to the second Stanwix Treaty. The Indian description of the
+boundary line in the Fort Stanwix Treaty of 1768 may also have had some
+impact upon Meginness. Regardless, a comparison of data, pro and con,
+will demonstrate that the Tiadaghton is Lycoming Creek.
+
+John Blair Linn, of Bellefonte, stood second to Meginness in popular
+repute as historian of the West Branch Valley. However, he too calls
+Pine Creek the Tiadaghton, though the reliability of his sources is
+questionable. Unlike Meginness, whose judgment derived somewhat from
+interviews with contemporaries of the period, Linn based his contention
+upon the statements made by the Indians at the second Stanwix Treaty
+meeting in 1784.[10]
+
+At those sessions on October 22 and 23, 1784, the Pennsylvania
+commissioners twice questioned the deputies of the Six Nations about the
+location of the Tiadaghton, and were told twice that it was Pine
+Creek.[11] In the first instance, Samuel J. Atlee, speaking for the
+other Pennsylvania commissioners, called attention to the last deed made
+at Fort Stanwix in 1768 and asked the question about the Tiadaghton:
+
+    This last deed, brothers, with the map annexed, are descriptive of
+    the purchase made sixteen years ago at this place; one of the
+    boundary lines calls for a creek by the name of _Tyadoghton_, we
+    wish our brothers the Six Nations to explain to us clearly which you
+    call the _Tyadoghton_, as there are two creeks issuing from the
+    _Burnet's Hills_, _Pine_ and _Lycoming_.[12]
+
+Captain Aaron Hill, a Mohawk chief, responded for the Indians:
+
+    With regard to the creek called _Tyadoghton_, mentioned in your deed
+    of 1768, we have already answered you, and again repeat it, it is
+    the same you call _Pine Creek_, being the largest emptying into the
+    west branch of the _Susquehannah_.[13]
+
+This, of course, was the "more positive answer" which the Indians had
+promised after the previous day's interrogation.[14] It substantiated
+the description given in the discussions preceding the Fort Stanwix
+Treaty of 1768.[15] However, the map illustrating the treaty line,
+although tending to support this view, is subject to interpretation.[16]
+Regardless, this record of the treaty sessions provides the strongest
+evidence to sustain the Pine Creek view.
+
+There is little doubt that Meginness and Linn were influenced by the
+record. This is certainly true of D. S. Maynard, a lesser
+nineteenth-century historian, whose work is obviously based upon the
+research of Meginness. Maynard repeated the evidence of his predecessor
+from the account of Thomas Sergeant by describing the Stanwix Treaty
+line of 1768 as coming "across to the headwaters of Pine Creek."
+Maynard's utter dependence upon Meginness suggests that his evidence is
+more repetitive than substantive.[17]
+
+A more recent student of local history, Eugene P. Bertin, of Muncy,
+gives Pine Creek his undocumented support, which appears to be nothing
+more than an elaboration of the accounts of Meginness and Linn.[18] Dr.
+Bertin's account appears to be better folklore than history.[19]
+
+Another twentieth-century writer, Elsie Singmaster, offers more
+objective support for Pine Creek, although her argument appears to be
+better semantics than geography.[20]
+
+Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, in his biography of David Zeisberger, errs in
+his interpretation of the term "Limping Messenger" (Tiadaghton), used by
+Bishop Spangenburg in his account of their journey to the West Branch
+Valley in 1745. He notes that on their way to Onondaga (Syracuse) after
+leaving "Ostonwaken" (Montoursville) they passed through the valley of
+Tiadaghton Creek. They were following the Sheshequin Path. But he
+identifies the Tiadaghton with Pine Creek. There was an Indian path up
+Pine Creek, but it led to Niagara, not Onondaga.[21]
+
+Aside from the designation by the Indians at the second Stanwix Treaty,
+there is only one other source which lends any credibility to the Pine
+Creek view, and that is Smith's _Laws of the Commonwealth of
+Pennsylvania_. After the last treaty was made acquiring Pennsylvania
+lands from the Indians, the legislature, in order to quell disputes
+about the right of occupancy in this "New Purchase,"[22] passed the
+following legislation:
+
+    And whereas divers persons, who have heretofore occupied and
+    cultivated small tracts of land, without the bounds of the purchase
+    made, as aforesaid, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven
+    hundred and sixty-eight, and within the purchase made, or now to be
+    made, by the said commissioners, have, by their resolute stand and
+    sufferings during the late war, merited, that those settlers should
+    have the pre-emption of their respective plantations:
+
+    _Be it therefore enacted by the authority aforesaid_, That all and
+    every person or persons, and their legal representatives, who has or
+    have heretofore settled on the north side of the west branch of the
+    river Susquehanna, upon the Indian territory, between Lycomick or
+    Lycoming creek on the east, and Tyagaghton or Pine creek on the
+    west, as well as other lands within the said residuary purchase from
+    the Indians, of the territory within this state, excepting always
+    the lands herein before excepted, shall be allowed a right of
+    pre-emption to their respective possessions, at the price
+    aforesaid.[23]
+
+It may be worth observing, however, that legislation tends to reflect
+popular demand rather than the hard facts of a situation. In this case
+the settlers of the region prior to 1780 stood to benefit by this
+legislation and formed an effective pressure group.
+
+The contrary view in this long-standing geographical debate is based,
+for the most part, upon the records of journalists and diarists who
+traveled along the West Branch _prior_ to the first Stanwix Treaty and
+who thus had no axe to grind.
+
+That the Lycoming Creek was in fact the Tiadaghton referred to by the
+Indians at Fort Stanwix in 1768 is strongly indicated by the weight of
+evidence derived from the journals of Conrad Weiser (1737), John Bartram
+(1743), Bishop Spangenburg (1745), Moravian Bishop John Ettwein (1772),
+and the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian (1775). In addition, the maps of
+Lewis Evans (1749) and John Adlum (1792), the land applications of
+Robert Galbreath and Martin Stover (1769), and a 1784 statute of the
+Pennsylvania General Assembly all tend to validate Lycoming's claim to
+recognition as the Tiadaghton. Each datum has merit in the final
+analysis, which justifies the specific examination which follows:
+
+Supporting evidence is found in Weiser's German journal, which was meant
+for his family and friends, and translated into English by his
+great-grandson, Hiester H. Muhlenberg. (Weiser also kept an English
+journal for the Council at Philadelphia.) Weiser wrote: "The stream we
+are now on the Indians call Dia-daclitu, (die berirte, the lost or
+bewildered) which in fact deserves such a name."[24] (This is an obvious
+misspelling of Diadachton.) Weiser was following the Sheshequin Path
+with Shickellamy to Onondaga and this entry is recorded on March 25,
+1737, long before there was any question about the Tiadaghton.
+
+There seems to be some confusion over Bishop Spangenburg's use of the
+term "Limping Messenger" in his journal for June 8, 1745. He too was
+traveling the Sheshequin Path with David Zeisberger, Conrad Weiser,
+Shickellamy, Andrew Montour, _et al._ He describes the "Limping
+Messenger" as a camp on the "Tiadachton" (Lycoming), whereas
+DeSchweinitz in his _Zeisberger_ interprets the term to mean Pine
+Creek.[25]
+
+Another traveler along the Sheshequin Path was the colonial botanist,
+John Bartram. Bartram, in the company of Weiser and Lewis Evans, the map
+maker, notes in his diary of July 12, 1743, riding "down [up] a valley
+to a point, a prospect of an opening bearing N, then down the hill to a
+run and over a rich neck lying between it and the Tiadaughton."[26]
+Incidentally, the editor of this extract from Bartram's journal makes
+the quite devastating point that Meginness did not know of Bartram's
+journal, which was published in London in 1751 but which did not appear
+in America until 1895.[27]
+
+One of the Moravian journalists who visited the scenic Susquehanna along
+the West Branch was Bishop John Ettwein, who passed through this valley
+on his way to Ohio in 1772. He wrote of "Lycoming Creek, [as the stream]
+which marks the boundary line of lands purchased from the Indians."[28]
+
+Perhaps the most interesting and informative diarist who journeyed along
+the West Branch was the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian. Fithian came to
+what we will establish as Fair Play country on July 25, 1775, at what he
+called "Lacommon Creek." His conclusion was that this creek was the
+Tiadaghton.[29] It is this same Fithian, it might be added, whose
+Virginia journals were the primary basis for the reconstruction of
+colonial Williamsburg.
+
+The work of colonial cartographers also substantiates the claim that
+Lycoming Creek is the Tiadaghton. Both Lewis Evans, following his 1743
+journey in the company of Bartram and Weiser, and John Adlum, who
+conducted a survey of the West Branch Valley in 1792 for the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, failed to label Pine Creek as the
+"Tiadaghton" on their maps.[30] In fact, Adlum's map of 1792, found
+among the papers of William Bingham, designates the area east of
+Lycoming Creek as the "Old Purchase." Furthermore, as is the case with
+Evans' map, Adlum does not apply the Tiadaghton label to either Pine
+Creek or Lycoming Creek.[31]
+
+Two applications in 1769 for land in the New Purchase show that the
+Tiadaghton, or in this case "Ticadaughton," can only be Lycoming Creek.
+The application of Robert Galbreath (no. 1823) is described as "Bounded
+on one side by the Proprietor's tract at Lycoming." Martin Stover
+applied for the same tract (application no. 2611), which is described as
+"below the mouth of Ticadaughton Creek."[32] The copies of these two
+applications, together with the copy of the survey, offer irrefutable
+proof of the validity of Lycoming's claim.
+
+Perhaps the final note is the action of the General Assembly of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on December 12, 1784.[33] The legislators
+affirmed the judgments of the frontier journalists, whose recorded
+journeys offer the best proof that the Lycoming is the Tiadaghton. Prior
+to this action, the Provincial authorities had issued a proclamation on
+September 20, 1773, prohibiting settlement west of Lycoming Creek by
+white persons. Violators were to be apprehended and tried. The penalties
+were real and quite severe: £500 fine, twelve months in prison without
+bail, and a guarantee of twelve months of exemplary conduct after
+release.[34] Court records, however, fail to indicate any prosecutions.
+
+Finally, the latest scholar to delve into the complexities of the
+Stanwix treaties, Professor Peter Marshall, says that there was no
+prolonged and close discussion about the running of the treaty line in
+Pennsylvania (the Tiadaghton question), no discussion in any way
+comparable to that which took place over its location in New York.[35]
+
+In summary then, it appears that the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768 was
+responsible for opening the West Branch Valley to settlement, such
+settlement being stimulated by the opening of the Land Office in
+Philadelphia on April 3, 1769. James Tilghman, secretary of the Land
+Office, published the notice of his office's willingness "to receive
+applications from all persons inclinable to take up lands in the New
+Purchase."[36] The enthusiasm generated by the opening of the Land
+Office is shown by the better than 2,700 applications received on the
+very first day. However, the question of the Tiadaghton came to be a
+source of real contention. The ambiguity of the Indian references to the
+western boundary of the first Stanwix Treaty led the eager settlers, who
+were seeking to legitimize claims in the area between Lycoming and Pine
+creeks, to favor Pine Creek. There was substance to the settlers' claim.
+
+The significance of the boundary question to this study is better
+understood when it is recognized that the so-called Fair Play system of
+government in lands beyond the Provincial limits must have a definable
+locale. It is this writer's firm conviction that Fair Play territory
+extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna, to the Great Island, some five miles west of Pine
+Creek. The foundation for the establishment of Lycoming Creek as the
+Tiadaghton, and consequently, as the eastern boundary of the Fair Play
+territory is apparent once all the evidence is examined. Aside from the
+comments of the Indians at the treaty negotiations and Smith's _Laws of
+the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_, there are only secondary accounts
+with little documentation to sustain the Pine Creek argument.
+
+On the other hand, the Lycoming Creek claim is buttressed by such
+primary sources as the journals of Weiser, Bartram, Spangenberg,
+Ettwein, and Fithian, three of which were written before the location of
+the Tiadaghton became a subject of dispute. Since none of these men was
+seeking lands, they can be considered impartial observers. Furthermore,
+the cartographic efforts of Lewis Evans and John Adlum followed actual
+visits to the region and say nothing to favor the Pine Creek view.
+
+Perhaps the Indians were merely accepting an already accomplished fact
+at the meeting in 1784. Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace says that this would have
+been expected from the subservient, pacified Indian. Regardless, the
+Provincial leadership made no effort to settle the lands in what some
+called "the disputed territory" until after the later agreement at
+Stanwix; in fact, they discouraged it.[37] The simple desire for
+legitimacy gives us very little to go on in the light of more than
+adequate documentation of the justice of the Lycoming view.
+
+This evidence might suggest changing the name of the long-revered
+"Tiadaghton Elm" to the "Pine Creek Elm" and bringing to a close the
+vexatious question of the Tiadaghton. However let us strike a note of
+caution, if not humility. Indian place names had a way of shifting,
+doubling, and moving, since they served largely as descriptive terms and
+not as true place names. It is not at all unusual to find the same name
+applied to several places or to find names migrating. The Tiadaghton
+could have been Lycoming Creek to some Indians at one time, and Pine
+Creek to others at the same or another time. Consider, for example, that
+there were three Miami rivers in present Ohio, which are now known as
+the Miami, the Little Miami, and the Maumee. It hardly makes any real
+difference to the geography of the Fair Play territory, or to the
+delimiting of its boundaries, which stream was the Tiadaghton. Actually,
+it was the doubt about it which drew in the squatters and created Fair
+Play. These settlers justified their contention that the Tiadaghton was
+Pine Creek by moving into the territory and holding onto it. This may be
+reason enough for calling the famous tree the Tiadaghton Elm, even if
+early travelers and the proprietary officials said that the Tiadaghton
+was Lycoming Creek.[38]
+
+The topography of the region also influenced the delineation of what we
+call Fair Play territory. The jugular vein which supplies the life-blood
+to this region is undoubtedly the West Branch of the Susquehanna River.
+This branch of the great river, which drains almost fifty per cent of
+the State, follows a northeasterly course of some forty miles from the
+Great Island, which is just east of present Lock Haven, to what is now
+Muncy, then turns southward.[39]
+
+The West Branch of the mighty Susquehanna, which has plagued generations
+of residents with its spring floodings, was the primary means of ingress
+and egress for the area. Rich bottom lands at the mouths of Lycoming,
+Larrys, and Pine creeks drew the hardy pioneer farmers, and here they
+worked the soil to provide the immediate needs for survival. Hemmed in
+on the north by the plateau area of the Appalachian front and on the
+south by the Bald Eagle Mountains, these courageous pioneers of frontier
+democracy carved their future out of the two-mile area (more often less)
+between those two forbidding natural walls. With the best lands to be
+found around the mouth of Pine Creek, which is reasonably close to the
+center of this twenty-five-mile area, it seems quite natural that the
+major political, social, and economic developments would take place in
+close proximity--and they did.[40]
+
+Thus, an area never exceeding two miles in width and spanning some ten
+miles (presently from Jersey Shore to Lock Haven) was the heartland of
+Fair Play settlement. Lycoming Creek, Larrys Creek, and Pine Creek all
+run south into the West Branch, having channeled breaks through the
+rolling valley which extends along the previously defined territory.
+
+"The land was ours before we were the land's," the poet said, and it
+seems apropos of this moment in history.[41] Fair Play territory,
+possessed before it was owned and operated under _de facto_ rule, would
+be some time in Americanizing the sturdy frontiersmen who came to bring
+civilization to this wilderness.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Carl L. Becker, _Beginnings of the American People_ (Ithaca, N. Y.,
+1960), p. 182.
+
+[2] Turner, _Frontier and Section_, p. 51.
+
+[3] Frederick Jackson Turner, _The Frontier in American History_ (New
+York, 1963), p. 9.
+
+[4] E. B. O'Callaghan, _Documentary History of the State of New York_
+(Albany, 1849), I, 587-591.
+
+[5] Henry Steele Commager, _Documents of American History_ (New York,
+1958), I, 49.
+
+[6] An earlier twentieth-century historian misinterprets the first
+Stanwix Treaty in much the same manner as earlier colonial historians
+erred in their judgments of the Proclamation of 1763. Albert T.
+Volwiler, _George Croghan and the Westward Movement, 1741-1782_
+(Cleveland, 1926), p. 250, really overstates his case, if the Fair Play
+settlers are any example, when he claims that the Fort Stanwix line, by
+setting a definite boundary, impeded the western advance. Establishing
+friendships with the Indians and then persuading them to sell their
+lands proved valuable to more than speculators, whose case Volwiler
+documents so well, as West Branch settlements after 1768 will attest.
+
+[7] The extension of Provincial authority to Pine Creek would have taken
+in three-fourths of what we have labeled Fair Play territory.
+
+[8] John F. Meginness, _Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley
+of the Susquehanna_ (Williamsport, 1889), p. 106. The full passage from
+the Bethlehem Diary (now in the Moravian Archives) was translated by the
+late Dr. William N. Schwarze for Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, historian of
+the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, as follows: "In the
+afternoon [June 8, New Style] our brethren left that place [beyond
+Montoursville] and came in the evening to the Limping Messenger on the
+Tiadachton Creek, where they spent the night." In the _Pennsylvania
+Magazine of History and Biography_, II (1878), 432 (hereafter cited as
+_PMHB_), Zeisberger's account is translated in this manner: "In the
+afternoon we proceeded on our journey, and at dusk came to the 'Limping
+Messenger,' or Diadachton Creek [a note identifies this as Lycoming],
+and encamped for the night." Here the error is in identifying the
+Limping Messenger with the stream. Meginness, of course, repeated the
+error in his _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 106. Referring the passage to
+Vernon H. Nelson of the Moravian Archives, through Dr. Wallace, resulted
+in a clarification of the translation and the affirmation of the
+"Limping Messenger" as a camp on the stream. In the Bethlehem Diary,
+under June 8, 1754, the sentence appears as follows: "des Nachm.
+reissten unsre Brr Wieder von da weg u kamen Abends zum hinckenden Boten
+an der Tiatachton Creek, u lagen da uber Nacht." In the original travel
+journal the passage reads: "des Nachm. reissten wir wieder von da weg, u
+kamen Abends zum _hinckenden Boten_ an der Tiatachton Crick u lagen da
+uber Nacht." De Schweinitz in his _Zeisberger_ further confused the
+issue in his description of the journey. He takes the adventurers
+(Zeisberger, Spangenburg, Conrad Weiser, Shickellamy, and Andrew
+Montour) through the valley of the Tiadaghton Creek on the Sheshequin
+Path to Onondaga (Syracuse). There was an Indian path up Pine Creek, but
+it led to Niagara, not Onondaga.
+
+[9] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 106. This is an added note of
+Meginness' commentary upon the citation noted above.
+
+[10] John Blair Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties,
+Pennsylvania_ (Philadelphia, 1883), p. 468. Linn also deals with the
+Tiadaghton question in his "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers,"
+_PMHB_, VII (1883), 420-425. Here he simply defines Fair Play territory
+as "Indian Land" encompassing the Lycoming-Pine Creek region.
+
+[11] _Minutes of the First Session of the Ninth General Assembly of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ..._ (Philadelphia, 1784), Appendix,
+Proceedings of the Treaties held at Forts Stanwix and McIntosh, pp.
+314-322.
+
+[12] _Ibid._, Oct. 23, p. 319.
+
+[13] _Ibid._
+
+[14] _Ibid._, Oct. 22, p. 316.
+
+[15] E. B. O'Callaghan, _Documents Relative to the Colonial History of
+the State of New York_, VIII (Albany, 1857), 125. In the discussions
+preceding the Fort Stanwix Treaty of 1768, the Indians' description of
+the boundary line could be interpreted as favoring Pine Creek: "... to
+the Head of the West Branch of Susquehanna thence down the same to Bald
+Eagle Creek thence across the River at Tiadaghta Creek below the great
+Island, thence by a straight Line to Burnett's Hills and along the
+same...." The juxtaposition of Bald Eagle Creek, the Great Island, and
+"Tiadaghta" Creek makes this conclusion plausible.
+
+[16] _See also ibid._, Guy Johnson's map illustrating the treaty line,
+opposite p. 136.
+
+[17] D. S. Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County, From Its
+Earliest Settlement To The Present Time_ (Lock Haven, 1875), p. 8. The
+line is given by Maynard as follows: "... and took in the lands lying
+east of the North Branch of the Susquehanna, beginning at Owego, down to
+Towanda, thence up the same and across to the headwaters of Pine Creek;
+thence down the same to Kittanning...."
+
+[18] Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, VIII (1947), 258-259.
+
+[19] Dr. Bertin, former associate secretary of the Pennsylvania State
+Education Association, adds nothing to the Meginness and Linn accounts,
+his probable sources. He speaks of settlements as early as 1772, whereas
+it is a matter of record that Cleary Campbell squatted in what is now
+north Lock Haven sometime shortly after 1769. He refers to the
+establishment of homes, properly, but then goes on to add churches and
+schools. The source for his "Children and elders met together
+periodically to recite catechism to the preacher, who was a travelling
+missionary, one being Phillip Fithian," was J. B. Linn. But Fithian, an
+extremely accurate diarist, fails to mention the occasion during his
+one-week visit to this area in the summer of 1775. However, the real
+value of this article is the editorial note by T. Kenneth Wood on the
+Tiadaghton question. In it he refers to John Bartram's journal of 1743,
+twenty-five years before the Stanwix Treaty at Rome, N. Y., with the
+Iroquois, which recounts his travels with the Oneida Chief Shickellamy
+and Conrad Weiser. Lewis Evans was also in the party, making notes for
+his map of 1749. The party, on its way to Onondaga (Syracuse), was
+approaching Lycoming Creek at a point just south of Powys, via the
+Sheshequin Indian path. Bartram, the first American botanist, who wrote
+in his journal nightly after checking with his two guides, gives this
+account, T. Kenneth Wood (ed.), "Observations Made By John Bartram In
+His Travels from Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the Lake Ontario
+in 1743," _Now and Then_, V (1936), 90: "Then down a hill to a run and
+over a rich neck of land lying between it and the Tiadaughton." No
+contact was made with Pine Creek. Dr. Wood contends in his note to the
+Bertin article, and this writer is inclined to agree, that the Indian of
+1743 and the Indian of 1768 were telling the truth and that the white
+settlers of 1768, and for sixteen years thereafter, were wrong, either
+through guile and design or ignorance. He says, "The original Indian
+principals signing the treaty had retreated westward and sixteen years
+of fighting over the question (and possibly a few bribes) had settled it
+to the white man's satisfaction. The Indians always had to yield or get
+out." This is essentially the point which Dr. Wallace made to me in his
+letter of Feb. 16, 1961.
+
+[20] Elsie Singmaster, _Pennsylvania's Susquehanna_ (Harrisburg, 1950),
+p. 87. Her Pine Creek description (while describing tributaries of the
+Susquehanna) speaks of the gorge as the upper course of Pine Creek,
+which is now part of Harrison State Park. Here, she says, "The rim is
+accessible by a paved highway, and from there one may look down a
+thousand feet and understand why the Indians called the stream
+Tiadaghton or Lost Creek."
+
+[21] Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, _The Life and Times of David Zeisberger_
+(Philadelphia, 1871), p. 133. Further evidence of DeSchweinitz'
+confusion is found in his Geographical Glossary in the same book. On
+page 707, he calls the Great Island, Lock Haven; on page 709, he calls
+Long Island, Jersey Shore; and on page 713, he refers to Pine Creek as
+the Tiadaghton, "also called Diadaghton."
+
+[22] The term "New Purchase" was frequently used, both officially and
+otherwise, to designate the area on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island, although in
+actuality the purchase line terminated at Lycoming Creek.
+
+[23] Charles Smith, _Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_
+(Philadelphia, 1810), II, 274.
+
+[24] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Conrad Weiser, Friend of Colonist and Mohawk_
+(Philadelphia, 1945), p. 81.
+
+[25] Wallace mistakenly attaches the appellation "Limping Messenger" to
+"a foot-sore Indian named Anontagketa," _ibid._, p. 220. However, this
+error was corrected in a letter to this writer, August 24, 1962.
+
+[26] Wood (ed.), "Observations Made By John Bartram," p. 90.
+
+[27] _Ibid._, p. 79.
+
+[28] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 411.
+
+[29] Robert Greenhalgh Albion and Leonidas Dodson (eds.), _Philip
+Vickers Fithian: Journal, 1775-1776_ (Princeton, 1934), pp. 69-76.
+
+[30] Hazel Shields Garrison, "Cartography of Pennsylvania before 1800,"
+_PMHB_, LIX (1935), 255-283. Information on Adlum's maps was obtained
+from [T. Kenneth Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor,
+1792, Found Among the Bingham Papers," _Now and Then_, X (July, 1952),
+148-150.
+
+[31] [Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum," pp. 148-150.
+
+[32] Bureau of Land Records, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, New Purchase
+Applications, Nos. 1823 and 2611, April 3, 1769.
+
+[33] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XI, 508.
+
+[34] _Colonial Records_, X, 95.
+
+[35] In a letter to this writer, May 19, 1962, Professor Marshall
+states: "It was my opinion that the treaty marked, in one aspect, a
+bargain between Johnson and the Six Nations. I do not accept
+Billington's charge of betrayal of their interests. But it does seem to
+me that this meant hard bargaining in New York, when the state of Indian
+and colonial lands was precisely known to both sides, and indifference
+and ignorance beyond this point.... As far as I am aware, there was no
+prolonged and close discussion about the running of the line in
+Pennsylvania in the least comparable to that which took place over its
+location in New York." _See_ Peter Marshall, "Sir William Johnson and
+the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, 1768," _The Journal of American Studies_, I
+(Oct., 1967), pp. 149-179.
+
+[36] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 340.
+
+[37] Helen Herritt Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of
+Independence," _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XXII (1958), 1-15.
+
+[38] The fame of this historic elm stems from the fact that it is
+reputed to be the site of a local declaration of independence made the
+same day as the adoption of Jefferson's draft in Philadelphia, July 4,
+1776. The author is indebted to Donald H. Kent, Director of the Bureau
+of Archives and History, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,
+for the idea and some of the expression in this paragraph.
+
+[39] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation_ (New York,
+1962) p. 3. This delightful book in the "Regions of America" series,
+edited by Carl Carmer, contains an excellent chapter on the significance
+of Pennsylvania's "Three Rivers."
+
+[40] Gristmills--meeting places of the Fair Play tribunal--a school, and
+a church would all be found in this Pine Creek region. However, the
+church (Presbyterian) would not be built until the territory became an
+official part of the Commonwealth following the second Stanwix Treaty in
+1784.
+
+[41] Robert Frost, _Complete Poems of Robert Frost_ (New York, 1949), p.
+467. This poem somehow characterizes the experiences of the settlers of
+this frontier and many frontiers to come.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER TWO
+
+_The Fair Play Settlers: Demographic Factors_
+
+
+James Logan, president of the Proprietary Council of Pennsylvania,
+1736-1738, once declared that "if the Scotch-Irish continue to come they
+will make themselves masters of the Province."[1] His prediction, which
+was to be generally proven in the Province during the French and Indian
+War, was to be demonstrated particularly in the West Branch Valley
+during the Revolutionary period. The Scotch-Irish were the dominant
+national or ethnic group in the Fair Play territory from 1769 to 1784.
+This dominance is demonstrated in Chart 1, which indicates the national
+origins of eighty families in the Fair Play territory.
+
+
+ CHART 1
+
+ National Origins of Fair Play Settlers[2]
+ Expressed in Numbers and Percentages
+
+  Total  Scotch-Irish   English  German  Scots  Irish  Welsh  French
+ ====================================================================
+   80         39          16       12     5       4     2       2
+    %         48.75       20       15     6.25    5     2.5     2.5
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Not only were the Scotch-Irish the most numerous national stock among
+the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley, but they also
+represented a plurality and almost a majority of the entire population.
+The significance of this finding in terms of the "style of life" of the
+Fair Play settlers cannot be over-emphasized. It influenced the
+politics, the religion, the family patterns, and thus the values of this
+frontier society.
+
+Several other important conclusions can be drawn from this chart. In
+contrast to the population of Pennsylvania in general and the
+assumptions regarding frontier areas in particular, the English, rather
+than the Germans, were the second most numerous national stock group.
+The Germans, however, made up the third-largest segment of the West
+Branch Valley population. The Scots, Welsh, Irish, and a few French
+inhabitants formed the remaining sixteen per cent of the population.
+Obviously, this was a dominantly Anglo-Saxon Protestant area of
+settlement.
+
+The impact of this Scotch-Irish hegemony upon the religion, politics,
+family life, and social values in general will be dealt with in a later
+chapter. However, it can be noted at this juncture that the
+strong-willed individualism which characterized these sturdy people was
+as much influenced by their national origin as by their experience on
+the American frontier. Furthermore, Presbyterianism influenced and was
+influenced by a developing democratic political system, which paralleled
+the American Presbyterian system of popular rather than hierarchical
+church government.[3] A prominent immigration historian has pointed out
+that "the theory of Presbyterian republicanism, as a matter of church
+policy, could easily be reconciled with demands of the more radical
+democrats of 1776."[4] Finally, the social life and customs and, hence,
+the values of this frontier society were governed for the most part by
+this majority group. Thus, dogmatic faith, political equality, social
+and economic independence, respect for education, and a tightly-knit
+pattern of family relationships express appropriately the institutional
+patterns by which the Scotch-Irish of the West Branch operated.
+
+It is interesting to contrast the national stock groupings of this
+Susquehanna frontier with the results of a study of national origins of
+the American population made by the American Council of Learned
+Societies and published in 1932:[5]
+
+
+ CHART 2
+
+ Classification of the White Population into Its National
+ Stocks in the Continental United States and Pennsylvania:
+ 1790; and in the Fair Play Territory: 1784 (Expressed in Percentages).
+
+         Scotch-Irish  English  German  Scots  Irish  Welsh  French  Other
+ =========================================================================
+ Conti-
+ nental
+ United
+ States         5.9     60.1      8.6     8.1   3.6      0     2.3    10.6
+
+ Penn-
+ sylva-
+ nia           11.0     35.3     33.3     8.6   3.5      0     1.8     6.5
+
+ Fair
+ Play
+ Terri-
+ tory         48.75       20       15    6.25     5    2.5     2.5       0
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+From this comparison it can readily be seen that the national origins of
+the Fair Play settlers in no way conform to either the national pattern
+or the State pattern of just a few years later. Although this limited
+frontier area can be recognized as having its own individual ratio of
+component stocks, it is representative rather than unique in its culture
+and values. The reaction of those of other national stocks to the
+frontier experience buttresses the conclusion that their values were
+influenced more by the frontier than by national origin. It is this
+common reaction to the problems of the frontier which gives rise to the
+conclusion that this West Branch Valley environment was characterized by
+and that its inhabitants held values which Turner evaluated as
+democratic. The nature of those democratic values is, however, dealt
+with in greater detail in subsequent chapters.
+
+The American sources of emigration form the next question to be
+considered in examining the origins of the Fair Play settlers. Lacking
+adequate statistical data for a complete picture of migration in terms
+of percentages, the following chart indicates only the probable origins
+of the three most numerous national stock groupings in the Fair Play
+territory:
+
+
+ CHART 3
+
+ American Sources of Emigration[6]
+
+  National     Percentage of
+   Stock        Population      American Source of Emigration
+ ===============================================================
+ Scotch-Irish     48.75       Chester, Cumberland, Dauphin,
+                              Lancaster counties
+
+ English          20          New Jersey, New York, southeastern
+                              Pennsylvania (Philadelphia and
+                              Bucks counties)
+
+ German           15          Chester, Lancaster, Philadelphia,
+                              and York counties
+
+ Total            83.75
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Obviously, the primary sources for the West Branch settlements were the
+lower Susquehanna Valley and southeastern Pennsylvania. However, an
+appreciable number of English settlers appear to have come originally
+from New Jersey to settle in what they called "Jersey Shore,"
+immediately east of the mouth of Pine Creek. One explanation for the
+migration of the dominant stock, the Scotch-Irish, is probably the fact
+that the Provincial government refused to sell more lands in Lancaster
+and York counties to the Scotch-Irish. In effect, they were driven to
+use squatter tactics in the Fair Play territory.[7]
+
+The internal origins of sixteen of these settlers can be verified in
+either Meginness or Linn. Four came from Chester County, three each from
+the Juniata Valley and Lancaster County, two each from Cumberland County
+and New Jersey, and one each from Dauphin County and from Orange County
+in New York. Nine of these settlers, incidentally, were Scotch-Irish.
+Although these data are insufficient for any valid generalization, they
+do conform to the characteristic migratory trends indicated in Chart 3.
+
+In analyzing the migration of settlers into the West Branch Valley
+beyond the line of the "New Purchase," it becomes apparent that the
+Scotch-Irish came from the fringe areas of settlement, whereas the
+English and Germans tended to migrate from more settled areas.
+Furthermore, the English migrants often came from outside the Province
+of Pennsylvania, either from New Jersey or New York. In fact, if one
+were to construct a pattern of concentric zones, with the core in the
+southeastern corner of the Province and the lines radiating in a
+north-westerly direction, the English would be found at the core, the
+Germans in the next zone, and the Scotch-Irish in the outlying area.
+This zoning offers no real contradiction of the usual pattern of
+Pennsylvania migrations. However, when one combines the data of internal
+movements with those of external origins, certain contradictions do
+appear. The most noteworthy of these is, of course, the prominence of
+English settlers on this Fair Play frontier vis-à-vis the Germans.
+
+Since the Pennsylvania frontiersmen of the Wyoming Valley were of
+English stock, and immigrated from New England, it might have been
+assumed that some of these Connecticut settlers came into the West
+Branch Valley. Here, however, all evidence points to the fact that
+Connecticut settlers did not migrate west of Muncy, which is located at
+the juncture of Muncy Creek and the West Branch of the Susquehanna River
+(where the bend in the river turns into a directly western pattern).
+Thus the Connecticut boundary dispute of 1769-1775, which erupted into
+the Pennamite Wars, did not involve the Fair Play settlers.[8]
+Nevertheless, at least one Fair Play settler looked forward to the
+possibility of an advance of the Connecticut settlement along the West
+Branch.[9]
+
+The impact of events upon the settlement of the Fair Play territory is
+particularly apparent when one examines the periods of immigration to
+and emigration from the region. Three events seemed to have had the
+greatest influence upon the immigration: the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in
+1768, which extended the Provincial limits to Lycoming Creek in this
+region, and the resultant opening of the Land Office for claims in the
+"New Purchase" on April 3, 1769;[10] the almost complete evacuation of
+the territory in the "Great Runaway" of the summer of 1778, which was
+prompted by Indian attacks and the fear of a great massacre comparable
+to the "Wyoming Valley Massacre" of that same year;[11] and finally, the
+Stanwix Treaty of 1784, which brought the Fair Play area within the
+limits of the Province.[12]
+
+The first Stanwix Treaty, made by Sir William Johnson with the Six
+Nations in November of 1768, extended the legitimate line of English
+colonial settlement from the line established by the Proclamation of
+1763 to a point on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River at the mouth
+of Lycoming Creek (the Tiadaghton, as it was so ambiguously
+labeled).[13] This extension, ostensibly for the purpose of providing
+lands for the colonial veterans of the French and Indian War, became a
+boon to speculators and an inducement to the Scotch-Irish squatters who
+took lands beyond the limits of this "New Purchase" in what was to
+become the Fair Play territory.
+
+In the summer of 1778 the war whoop once again caused the settlers of
+the West Branch Valley to flee from their homes for fear of a repetition
+of the Wyoming Massacre. The peril of the moment is vividly described in
+this communication to the Executive Council in Philadelphia from Colonel
+Samuel Hunter, commander of Fort Augusta:
+
+    The Carnage at Wioming, the devastations and murders upon the West
+    branch of Susquehanna, On Bald Eagle Creek, and in short throughout
+    the whole County to within a few miles of these Towns (the recital
+    of which must be shocking) I suppose must have before now have
+    reached your ears, if not you may figure yourselves men, women, and
+    children, Butchered and scalped, many of them after being promised
+    quarters, and some scalped alive, of which we have miserable
+    Instances amongst us.... I have only to add that A few Hundreds of
+    men well armed and immediately sent to our relief would prevent much
+    bloodshed, confusion and devastation ... as the appearance of being
+    supported would call back many of our fugitives to save their
+    Harvest for their subsistence, rather than suffer the inconveniences
+    which reason tells me they do down the Country and their with their
+    families return must ease the people below of a heavy and
+    unprofitable Burthen.[14]
+
+Robert Covenhoven, who lived at the mouth of the Loyalsock Creek and who
+fled to Sunbury (Fort Augusta) also, described the flight:
+
+    Such a sight I never saw in my life. Boats, canoes, hog-troughs,
+    rafts hastily made of dry sticks, every sort of floating article,
+    had been put in requisition, and were crowded with women, children,
+    and plunder. There were several hundred people in all.... The whole
+    convoy arrived safely at Sunbury, leaving the entire range of farms
+    along the West Branch to the ravages of the Indians.[15]
+
+In this eighteenth-century Dunkirk, the West Branch Valley was
+practically cleared of settlers.
+
+The Indians, it is true, proved troublesome to the entire advancing
+American frontier; but unlike the French, whose menacing forts had been
+removed in the recent wars, the Indians were unable to halt the westward
+penetration. An expedition under the leadership of Colonel Thomas
+Hartley was sent out expressly for the purpose of boosting morale in the
+West Branch Valley following the Wyoming Massacre and the Great Runaway.
+Colonel Hartley's letter to Thomas McKean, chief justice of Pennsylvania
+and a member of the Continental Congress, gives bitter testimony to the
+conditions which he observed in September of 1778:
+
+    You heard of the Distresses of these Frontiers they are truly
+    great--The People which we found were Difident and timid The Panick
+    had not yet left them--many a wealthy Family reduced to Poverty &
+    without a home, some had lost their Husbands their children or
+    Friends--all was gloomy.... the Barbarians do now and then attack an
+    unarmed man a Helpless Mother or Infant....
+
+The colonel indicated, however, that strong militia support and some
+offensive action would restore confidence and cause the people to return
+to the valley. His interpretation of the significance of his mission is
+quite clearly stated in the conclusion of his letter: "We shall not have
+it in our Power to gain Honour or Laurels on these Frontiers but we have
+the Satisfaction to think we save our Country...." Hartley's solution to
+the Indian problem, which had driven off the settlers, was to expel them
+"beyond the Lakes" excepting only the more civilized Tuscaroras and
+Oneidas.[16]
+
+Despite the danger from the Indians, the Fair Play settlers began
+trickling back to their homes, or what was left of them, toward the end
+of the Revolutionary War. Once the war was ended and the Fair Play
+territory was annexed by subsequent purchase, the mass movement of
+settlers to the West Branch Valley resumed.
+
+Incidentally, Dr. Wallace in his _Conrad Weiser_ assesses one John Henry
+Lydius with the major responsibility for the Indian massacres in central
+and northeastern Pennsylvania. Wallace notes that Lydius' Connecticut
+purchase from the Indians in 1754 caused "war between Pennsylvania and
+Connecticut and ... [precipitated] the Massacre of Wyoming in 1778."
+This massacre, as West Branch historians know, had its subsequent impact
+on the West Branch Valley in the Great Runaway, although the Winters
+Massacre of June 10, 1778, which prompted the evacuation of the valley,
+actually preceded the Wyoming affair.[17]
+
+Finally, the purchase of the remaining Indian lands in Pennsylvania
+(except for the small corner of the Erie Triangle) was made on October
+3, 1784, in a second Stanwix Treaty. This accession ended the
+Pennsylvania boundary dispute with the Six Nations; and it also ended
+the need for any extra-legal system of government in the West Branch
+Valley, for this new treaty encompassed the Fair Play territory.[18]
+However, this treaty raised the troublesome Tiadaghton question once
+again, a question only partly resolved by the Legislature's designation
+of Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton and the recognition of the
+squatters' right of pre-emption to their settlements along the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna.[19] The land office was opened for the sale
+of this purchase July 1, 1785; by 1786 fifty heads of families were
+listed for State taxes in Northumberland County.[20] Approximately fifty
+per cent of these taxables had been in the area earlier.
+
+Perhaps the only significant nationality trend to be noted in this
+important sequence of events is the tenacity of the Scotch-Irish and the
+subsequent increase of English and German settlers following this last
+"New Purchase."[21] Over half of the taxables in Pine Creek Township,
+the new designation for much of the Fair Play territory after it became
+an official part of the Province, were Scotch-Irish. As a result, these
+Scots from the north of Ireland continued to maintain their position of
+leadership even after the area was included in the Commonwealth.
+
+The reasons for migrating to the West Branch Valley in this fifteen-year
+period from 1769 to 1784 were varied and numerous. For the most part,
+the various nationality groups which emigrated from Europe came for
+economic opportunity and because of religious and political
+persecutions. Their movement to the frontier regions was prompted by
+similar problems. In fact, much the same as the earlier settlers of
+Jamestown and Plymouth, the squatters of the West Branch Valley came for
+gain and for God. Furthermore, the promise of Penn's "Holy Experiment,"
+in which men of diverse backgrounds could live together peacefully in
+religious freedom and political equality, encouraged them to come to
+Pennsylvania. However, once the dominant group of the Fair Play
+frontier, the Scotch-Irish, arrived in Pennsylvania, they found
+themselves unsuited to the settled areas. The natural enemy of the
+English, who had oppressed them at home, these settlers soon found
+themselves repeating the Old World conflicts. In addition, the German
+Pietists caused them further embarrassment in their new homes. Their
+Calvinism, fierce political independence, and earnest desire for land
+and opportunity soon made them _personae non gratae_ in the established
+areas. Hence, they migrated to the frontier areas and even beyond the
+limits of Provincial interference and control.[22]
+
+The paucity of population data makes impossible any extensive analysis
+of the stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers. However, the
+tax lists, both in the published archives and in the files of the county
+commissioners in Northumberland County, offer limited evidence for the
+early years, though they provide ample data for the years after 1773.
+Prior to the Great Runaway in 1778, tax lists are available for the
+entire county of Northumberland; the lists simply indicate the taxable's
+township, acreage, and tax. Records in the Northumberland County
+courthouse give the assessments for 1773, 1774, 1776, and 1778.
+
+Due to the fact that the Fair Play territory was outside the Provincial
+limits until after the purchase of Fort Stanwix in 1784, the assessment
+lists give only those persons residing within Northumberland County. As
+a result, there were only six to twelve settlers who associated with the
+Fair Play men who were included in the lists for 1773-1778. Chart 4
+indicates the names, national origins, and years listed for those
+settlers.
+
+
+ CHART 4
+
+ Fair Play Settlers on the Tax Rolls 1773-1778.[23]
+
+ Name                   National Origin  1773  1774  1776  1778
+ ==============================================================
+ James Alexander          Scotch-Irish     x     x
+ George Calhoune          Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ Cleary Campbell          Scotch-Irish           x
+ William Campbell, Jr.    Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ William Campbell, Jr.    Scotch-Irish                 x     x
+ John Clark               English                x
+ Thomas Forster           English          x     x     x     x
+ James Irwin              Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ John Jamison             English                            x
+ Isaiah Jones             Welsh                  x
+ Robert King              German           x           x     x
+ John Price               Welsh                  x     x
+                                          ---   ---   ---   ---
+ Totals                                    6     8     7     7
+ --------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+From these limited data one obviously concludes that the Scotch-Irish
+were not only the most numerous but also the most persistent of these
+frontiersmen. Also, nine of these men, that is all except Clark, Jones,
+and King, appear on the tax lists for Northumberland County for the year
+1785.[24] Interestingly enough, six of these nine were Scotch-Irish; and
+although our sample is limited, it is readily apparent that the stalwart
+Scots had a way of "hanging on." It would be presumptuous to conclude
+that seventy-five per cent of the residents before 1778 returned by
+1785; but it is fact that some forty families had made improvements in
+the area by 1773 when William Cooke was sent out by the Land Office to
+"Warn the People of[f] the unpurchased Land."[25] Furthermore, as
+indicated earlier, some fifty families appear on the assessments for
+1786, more than half of whom had been in the region before.
+
+Any effort to analyze the population in terms of stability and mobility
+runs head-on into the creation of new townships in the 1780's, the
+inability to establish death rates for this frontier, and the inadequacy
+of probate records. The result is that the data are intuitively rather
+than statistically sound. Chart 5 offers a comparison of tax lists over
+a period of nine years as the basis for some conclusions regarding the
+stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+
+ CHART 5
+
+ Population Stability and Mobility
+ Based Upon a Comparison of Tax Lists
+ For the Period From 1778 to 1787.[26]
+
+                         1778-80  1781  1783-84  1786  1787
+ ==========================================================
+ Number of residents
+   assessed                 27     29      34     40    68
+ Number appearing on
+   previous assessments      6     19      21     14    33
+ ----------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Except for the 1783-84 figures, all of the tax data are for State taxes.
+The exception is the listing for the federal supply tax in 1783-84. The
+steady growth rate of the area is easily recognizable both in raw
+figures and in percentages. Beginning with an increase of a little more
+than seven per cent between the first two listings, we find a seventy
+per cent increase in the final figures. The tremendous increase in the
+last two assessments may be due to the purchase of 1784 and the
+subsequent legitimizing of claims through the establishment of
+pre-emption rights.
+
+The stability of the population is particularly noted in the
+consistently high percentage of residents with some tenure in the
+valley. Furthermore, the apparent contradiction of this statement by the
+decline to fourteen residents in the 1786 listing who had once left and
+then returned is offset when one examines the neighboring township
+assessments for that same year. Here fourteen additional names of former
+Fair Play settlers are to be found which would sustain the
+characteristic pattern of tenure. The statistical problem is complicated
+by the creation of new townships following the purchase of 1784. Pine
+Creek and Lycoming were the new designations for the former Fair Play
+territory, Pine Creek running from the creek of that same name west, and
+Lycoming extending from Pine Creek east to Lycoming Creek.
+
+Petitions from the area in 1778, 1781, and 1784 give a similar picture.
+Almost half of the names which are found on the tax lists appear on two
+or more of these appeals. These include a distress petition in June of
+1778, and petitions asking recognition of pre-emption rights in 1781 and
+1784.[27] The signatures on the petitions range in number from
+thirty-nine to fifty-one, and at least twenty-four of these settlers
+signed two or more of these documents. The very nature of these
+petitions, particularly the later ones, indicates the tremendous desire
+on the part of these sturdy pioneers to remain in or return to their
+homes in the West Branch Valley. Here too, however, this tenacity of
+purpose is not strictly confined to the Scotch-Irish.
+
+What conclusions can be drawn from this analysis of the demographic
+factors in the Fair Play settlement? Particularly evident is the
+dominance of the Scotch-Irish, who numerically composed the greatest
+national stock group in the population. This dominance, as we have
+already noted, greatly influenced the political and social institutions
+of the area. Secondly, one might consider the numbers of English
+settlers, as compared with the number of Germans, surprising. As a
+matter of fact, if one adds the numbers of Scots and Welsh inhabitants
+to the English and Scotch-Irish, the result is an "English" percentage
+of seventy-seven and one half for the entire population. Thus it is
+quite logical to assume that English customs and language would prevail,
+and they did. Incidentally, it should be added that the "English" nature
+of the population, combined with the Scotch-Irish plurality, meant that
+the Scotch-Irish were more representative of this frontier than they
+were innovators of its customs and values.
+
+If a majority of the Fair Play settlers came from the British Isles,
+from where did they emigrate in America? Here it is quite clear that
+these frontiersmen were predominantly from the lower Susquehanna Valley
+and southeastern Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania was to them a land of
+liberty and opportunity;[28] and when they failed to find these
+privileges in the settled areas, they moved out on the frontier where
+they could make their own rules, that is to say, establish their own
+familiar institutions. The result was the Fair Play system.
+
+Although the Fair Play settlers came to America and central Pennsylvania
+for the usual political, economic, and social reasons, the two Stanwix
+treaties and the Indian raids of 1778 had the most influence on
+population fluctuations. The pioneers came into the territory
+over-reaching the limits of the "New Purchase" of 1768. They were driven
+out, almost to a man, in the Great Runaway of 1778. And finally, they
+returned after the second "New Purchase" in 1784, which resulted in the
+recognition of their pre-emption claims for their earlier illegal
+settlements. It is interesting to note that pre-emption claims were
+recognized in the West Branch Valley some forty-five years prior to
+federal legislation to that effect.[29]
+
+Despite fluctuations in the population, the Scotch-Irish were able to
+maintain their hold over the valley and thus influence the pattern of
+development for this frontier outpost. Horace Walpole, addressing the
+English Parliament during the American Revolution, said, "There is no
+use crying about it. Cousin America has run off with a Presbyterian
+parson, and that is the end of it."[30] The Scotch-Irish with their
+Presbyterianism had run off with the West Branch Valley as well; and
+their independent spirit would see them in the foreground of the
+"noblest rupture in the history of mankind." That independent spirit and
+leadership is particularly noted in the political system which they
+established along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Their "Fair
+Play system" is the primary concern of the next chapter.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] E. Melvin Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," _Americana_,
+XVII (1923), 382.
+
+[2] This chart was compiled by making a list of eighty names appearing
+in an article on the genealogy of the Fair Play men, Helen Herritt
+Russell, "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and Their
+Government," _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XII (1958), 16-43. Mrs. Russell is genealogist of the
+Fort Antes chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution in Jersey
+Shore, Pa. The names were checked in Meginness and Linn for possible
+national origin. Approximately one-fourth were verified in these
+sources. Although this writer questioned the validity of the geographic
+conclusions of Meginness and Linn, both have ample documentation for
+their findings regarding genealogy and national origins. These findings
+can be validated in the published archives. The entire sample of names
+was submitted to Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, a folklore specialist and
+professor of English at the Pennsylvania State University, whose
+determination was made on the basis of linguistic techniques.
+
+[3] Popular control was an American rather than a Scottish influence
+necessitated by the absence of sufficient numbers of ministers. In
+Scotland, the minister chose his elders and thus dominated the session;
+in America, the selection was made by the congregation. _See_ James G.
+Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish: A Social History_ (Chapel Hill, 1962), p.
+150.
+
+[4] Carl Wittke, _We Who Built America_ (Cleveland, 1963), p. 57.
+
+[5] American Council of Learned Societies, "Report of Committee on
+Linguistic and National Stocks in the Population of the United States,"
+_Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1931_
+(Washington, 1932), I, 124.
+
+[6] This summary has been prepared from three main sources: Wayland F.
+Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_ (Hamden, Conn.,
+1962), pp. 89-91; Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), pp. 161-167; and John
+B. Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania_
+(Philadelphia, 1883), pp. 447, 481-482.
+
+[7] Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.
+
+[8] Wayland F. Dunaway, _A History of Pennsylvania_ (Englewood Cliffs,
+N. J., 1948), pp. 131-137. According to John Bacon Deans, "The Migration
+of the Connecticut Yankees to the West Branch of the Susquehanna River,"
+_The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and
+Addresses_, XX (1954), 34-35, eighty-two Yankees came to Warrior's Run
+in September of 1775, but none went farther west.
+
+[9] Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., The
+Zebulon Butler Papers, Jonas Davis to Zebulon Butler, March 16, 1773.
+
+[10] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 340.
+
+[11] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 475; Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), pp. 508-511.
+
+[12] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 477; Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 666.
+
+[13] O'Callaghan, _Documentary History of the State of New York_, I,
+587-591.
+
+[14] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 509. This July 12, 1778,
+communication from Colonel Hunter did not fall on deaf ears, for Colonel
+Thomas Hartley was ordered to the area with his regiment before the
+summer was out.
+
+[15] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 475.
+
+[16] Richmond D. Williams, "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778,"
+_Now and Then_, XII (1960), 258-259.
+
+[17] Wallace, _Conrad Weiser_, pp. 362-363. Lydius had gotten the
+Indians drunk following the settlement at Albany between the Six Nations
+and the Proprietaries. This boundary line (Albany) "crossed the West
+Branch below the Big Island," p. 374.
+
+[18] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XI, 508.
+
+[19] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 667.
+
+[20] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 477.
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 711-713.
+
+[21] The ambiguity of the term "New Purchase" becomes apparent once it
+is recognized that territorial acquisitions of both Stanwix treaties
+adopted that appellation.
+
+[22] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 28-49.
+
+[23] Northumberland County Courthouse, Sunbury, Pa., Penns & C.
+1782-1811 Tax Assessments, Cabinet #1. This book, found in the cellar of
+the courthouse, also contains the Pine Creek assessment for 1789.
+
+[24] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 618-622.
+
+[25] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XII, 286-287. The squatters,
+apparently warned in advance, had practically all vacated the premises.
+However, neighbors across the river willingly gave their names.
+
+[26] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 437, 468, 557, 711,
+790.
+
+[27] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III (1875), 217, 518-522.
+The original petitions of 1781 and 1784 are located in the State
+Archives, Harrisburg.
+
+[28] Penn's colony was well advertised, and the emphasis upon liberty of
+conscience, when contrasted with the restrictions of the Test Act, gives
+ample support for the significance of liberty as a motivating factor.
+However, economic causes predominated.
+
+[29] Ray Allen Billington, _Westward Expansion_ (New York, 1960), p.
+380. Billington refers here to the distribution-pre-emption measure of
+1841, whereas Congress actually recognized squatters' rights in the act
+of 1830.
+
+[30] Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER THREE
+
+_The Politics of Fair Play_
+
+
+The political system of these predominantly Scotch-Irish squatters in
+the Susquehanna Valley, along the West Branch, offers a vivid
+demonstration of the impact of the frontier on the development of
+democratic institutions. Occupying lands beyond the reach of the
+Provincial legislature, with some forty families of mixed national
+origin in residence by 1773, these frontier "outlaws" had to devise some
+solution to the question of authority in their territory.[1] Their
+solution was the extra-legal creation of _de facto_ rule historically
+known as the Fair Play system. The following is a contemporary
+description of that system:
+
+    There existed a great number of locations of the third of April,
+    1769, for the choicest lands on the West Branch of Susquehanna,
+    between the mouths of _Lycoming_ and _Pine creeks_; but the
+    proprietaries, from extreme caution, the result of that experience,
+    which had also produced the very penal laws of 1768, and 1769, and
+    the proclamation already stated, had prohibited any surveys being
+    made beyond the _Lycoming_. In the mean time, in violation of all
+    law, a set of hardy adventurers, had from time to time, seated
+    themselves on this doubtful territory. They made improvements, and
+    formed a very considerable population. It is true, so far as
+    regarded the rights to real property, they were not under the
+    protection of the laws of the country; and were we to adopt the
+    visionary theories of some philosophers, who have drawn their
+    arguments from a supposed state of nature, we might be led to
+    believe that the state of these people would have been a state of
+    continual warfare; and that in contests for property the weakest
+    must give way to the strongest. To prevent the consequences, real
+    or supposed, of this state of things, they formed a mutual compact
+    among themselves. They annually elected a tribunal, in rotation, of
+    three of their settlers, whom they called _fair play men_, who were
+    to decide all controversies, and settle disputed boundaries. From
+    their decision there was no appeal. There could be no resistance.
+    The decree was enforced by the whole body, who started up in mass,
+    at the mandate of the court, and execution and eviction was as
+    sudden, and irresistible as the judgment. Every new comer was
+    obliged to apply to this powerful tribunal, and upon his solemn
+    engagement to submit in all respects, _to the law of the land_, he
+    was permitted to take possession of some vacant spot. Their decrees
+    were, however, just; and when their settlements were recognized by
+    law, and _fair play_ had ceased, their decisions were received in
+    evidence, and confirmed by judgments of courts.[2]
+
+The idea of authority from the people was nothing new; in fact, it is as
+old as the Greeks. Nor is the concept of a "social compact," here
+implied, particularly novel to the American scene. The theory was that
+people hitherto unconnected assembled and gave their consent to be
+governed by a certain ruler or rulers under some particular form of
+government.[3] Theoretically justified by John Locke in his persuasive
+defense of the Glorious Revolution, it had been practiced in Plymouth,
+Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire, where practical necessity
+had required it for settlements occasionally made outside charter
+limits. The frontier, whether in New England or in the West Branch
+Valley, created a practical necessity which made popular consent the
+basis of an actual government.
+
+They were not "covenanters" in the Congregational sense of having
+brought an established church with them to the Fair Play territory. But
+the Fair Play settlers understood and subscribed to the principle of
+popular control, which was fundamental to such solemnly made and
+properly ratified agreements. Separated from the authority of the crown,
+detached from the authority of the hierarchy of the church by the
+Protestant Reformation, possessing no American tradition of extensive
+political experience, these settlers could only depend upon themselves
+as proper authorities for their own political system.
+
+Furthermore, the great majority of the settlers who came to the Fair
+Play territory came from families who had left their homes in the old
+country to escape political, economic, and social restrictions, only to
+be made unwelcome in their new homes in the settled areas of
+Pennsylvania. Displaced persons in a new country, they were forced by
+lives of conflict to seek better opportunity by moving to undeveloped
+lands. As a result, they settled along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna, beyond the authority of the crown and outside the pressures
+of the Provincial legislature.
+
+If man is a predatory beast in his natural state, a belief some
+expressed in the eighteenth century, then it follows naturally that
+every society must have some agency of authority and control. The
+universally standardized solution to the problem of social control is
+government. The Fair Play system was the answer on this Susquehanna
+frontier to the need for some legitimate agency of force.[4] This system
+vested authority in the people through annual elections of a tribunal of
+three of their number. The members of the tribunal were given
+quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial powers over all the settlers
+in the West Branch Valley "beyond the purchase line."[5]
+
+Although no record of any of these elections has been preserved, the
+composition of the Fair Play tribunal in 1776 has been established and
+verified by subsequent reviews of land claims in the county courts.[6]
+Also, two of the members of the tribunal of 1775 are identified in a
+pre-emption claim made before the Lycoming County Court in 1797.[7] It
+is interesting to note that among these five men are represented the
+three most prominent national stock groups in the area, with the
+Scotch-Irish, as our earlier sample demonstrated, in the majority.
+
+Lacking returns of the annual elections of the tribunal and minutes of
+its actual meetings, we have only Smith's _Laws of the Commonwealth of
+Pennsylvania_, petitions from the Fair Play settlers, and the subsequent
+review of land questions by the Northumberland and Lycoming County
+courts to evaluate the tribunal, its members, and its procedures.
+However, these data are more than adequate in giving us a picture of
+this _de facto_, though illegal, rule, which existed in the West Branch
+Valley until the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784 brought the territory
+under Commonwealth jurisdiction. The composition of the electorate
+varied with the fluctuations in population caused by the two Stanwix
+treaties, the Revolution, and the Great Runaway.
+
+Since property and religious qualifications were the primary
+prerequisites to voting at this time, it seems logical to assume that a
+similar basis for suffrage operated in the West Branch Valley.[8] Having
+no regular church--the first, a Presbyterian, was not organized until
+1792--property qualifications appear to have been the basis for what, in
+this area, was practically universal manhood suffrage. Due to the fact
+that the entire settlement consisted of squatters, practically all of
+the heads of households were property holders, regardless of the
+questionable legality of their holdings. The tax lists indicate holdings
+of some 100 to 300 acres on the average for residents, so it is
+particularly difficult to know whether or not a minimum holding
+requirement prevailed. The Provincial suffrage requirement in this
+period was generally fifty acres of land or £50 of personal property.[9]
+
+Although this study encompasses a fifteen-year period from 1769 to 1784,
+it appears that the Fair Play system functioned for about five years,
+from 1773 to 1778. This is due to the fact that only "fourty
+Improvements,"[10] meaning forty family settlements, existed in the area
+by 1773, and that following the Great Runaway of 1778, the territory was
+almost devoid of settlers. The void was filled, however, when settlers
+began returning toward the end of the Revolution and following the
+accession of the territory in the second Stanwix Treaty, in 1784. Thus,
+for all practical purposes, the functioning of the Fair Play system was
+confined to this more limited time. Furthermore, the system was
+supplemented in 1776 by the introduction of the Committee of Safety, and
+later that year by the Council of Safety.[11]
+
+As is indicated in Smith's _Laws_, annual meetings were held to select
+the governing tribunal of three for the ensuing year. Generally convened
+at some readily accessible place, these sessions were presumably held in
+the open or at one of the frontier forts erected in the area: Fort
+Antes, across the river from Jersey Shore; or Fort Horn, located on the
+south side of the Susquehanna about eight miles west of Jersey Shore.
+There were frontier forts in the vicinity of the present Muncy--Fort
+Muncy--and Lock Haven--Fort Reed; but Fort Muncy was some twenty-odd
+miles east of the Fair Play territory and Fort Reed was beyond the Great
+Island at its western extremity. As a result, these outposts were
+unlikely meeting places for the tribunal or for its election.[12]
+Unfortunately, there is no recorded evidence of a specific meeting of
+the Fair Play men.
+
+The authority of the Fair Play tribunal extended across the entire
+territory from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island on the north side of
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna. However, most of the disputed cases,
+which can be verified by subsequent court reviews in either
+Northumberland or Lycoming counties, seem to have involved land claims
+in the area between Lycoming and Pine creeks. The tribunal accepted or
+rejected claims for settlement in the area and decided boundary
+questions and other controversies among settlers.[13] As to a specific
+code of laws, there is none of record. However, the cases subsequently
+reviewed in the established county courts refer to some of their regular
+practices. For example, any man who left his improvement for six weeks
+without leaving someone to continue it, lost his right to the
+improvement;[14] any man who went into the army could count on the Fair
+Play men (the tribunal) to protect his property;[15] any man who sought
+land in the territory was obliged to obtain not only the approval of the
+Fair Play men but also of his nearest potential neighbors;[16] and the
+summary process of ejectment which the Fair Play men exercised was real
+and certain and sometimes supported by the militia.[17]
+
+The specific membership of the Fair Play tribunal is rather difficult to
+ascertain due to its failure to keep minutes of its proceedings and the
+absence of any recorded code. However, as indicated earlier,[18] the
+existence of the tribunal between the years 1773 and 1778, and its
+actual composition in 1775 and 1776, have already been established from
+the review of its decisions by the Circuit Court of Lycoming County.
+Assuming the principle of rotation from a contemporary description,
+some eighteen settlers held the positions of authority during the years
+noted.[19] The cases reviewed reveal the names of five of these
+eighteen. Recognizing the limitations of our twenty-eight per cent
+sampling, however, it is interesting to note that the three major
+national stocks are represented in this restricted sample. Furthermore,
+as was mentioned previously,[20] the Scotch-Irish settlers, being in the
+majority, enjoyed the majority representation on the tribunal. An
+analysis of leadership in the territory, to be developed more fully
+later, leads one to conclude that the Scotch-Irish, in the main, were
+the political leaders of the area.[21]
+
+A diligent search of some sixty cases in the Court of Common Pleas in
+both Northumberland and Lycoming counties yielded some documentary
+evidence regarding the procedures of the Fair Play tribunal.[22] Three
+cases in Lycoming County and one from Northumberland County contain
+depositions which describe the activities of the Fair Play men in some
+detail. One case, _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, was appealed to the Supreme
+Court of the Commonwealth. All of the cases deal with the question of
+title to lands in the Fair Play territory following the purchase of
+these lands at the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784. The depositions taken
+in conjunction with these cases indicate the processes of settlement and
+ejectment, in addition to the policies regarding land tenure. The
+fairness of the Fair Play decisions is noted by the fact that the
+regular courts concurred with the earlier judgments of the tribunal.[23]
+
+An anecdote involving one of the Fair Play men, Peter Rodey, illustrates
+the nature of this frontier justice. According to legend, Chief Justice
+McKean of the State Supreme Court was holding court in this district,
+and, curious about the principles or code of the Fair Play men, he
+inquired about them of Peter Rodey, a former member of the tribunal.
+Rodey, unable to recall the details of the code, simply replied: "All I
+can say is, that since your Honor's coorts have come among us, _fair
+play_ has entirely ceased, and law has taken its place."[24]
+
+The justice of "fair play" and the nature of the system can be seen from
+an analysis of the cases reviewed subsequently in the established
+courts. As mentioned previously, these cases describe the procedures
+regarding settlement, land tenure, and ejectment. Although no recorded
+code of laws has been located, references to "resolutions of the Fair
+Play men" regularly appear in the depositions and summaries of these
+cases.[25] According to Leyburn, a customary "law" concerning settlement
+rights operated on the frontier, particularly among the
+Scotch-Irish.[26] This "law" recognized three settlement rights: "corn
+right," which established claims to 100 acres for each acre of grain
+planted; "tomahawk right," which marked off the area claimed by
+deadening trees at the boundaries of the claim; and, "cabin right,"
+which confirmed the claim by the construction of a cabin upon the
+premises. If the decisions of the regular courts are at all indicative,
+Fair Play settlement was generally based upon "cabin right." However,
+the frequent allusion to "improvements" implies some secondary
+consideration to what Leyburn has defined as "corn right."
+
+In the case of _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, the significance of
+"improvements," or "corn rights," vis-à-vis "cabin rights" is
+particularly noted.[27] The following summary of that case, found in
+_Pennsylvania Reports_, emphasizes that significance, in addition to
+defining a Fair Play "code" pertaining to land tenure:
+
+    THIS was an ejectment for 324 acres of land, part of the Indian
+    lands in _Northumberland_ county.
+
+    The plaintiff claimed under a warrant issued on the 2d _May_ 1785,
+    for the premises, and a survey made thereon upon the 10th _January_
+    1786. The defendant, on the 20th _June_ 1785, entered a caveat
+    against the claims of the plaintiff, and on the 5th _October_
+    following, took out a warrant for the land in dispute, on which he
+    was then settled. Both claimed the pre-emption under the act of 21st
+    _December_ 1784,[28] and on the evidence given the facts appeared to
+    be:
+
+    That in 1773, one _James Hughes_, a brother of the plaintiff,
+    settled on the lands in question and made some small improvements.
+    In the next year he enlarged his improvement, and cut logs to build
+    an house. In the winter following he went to his father's in
+    _Donegal_ in _Lancaster_ county, and died there. His elder brother
+    _Thomas_ was at that time settled on the Indian land, and one of the
+    "Fair Play Men," who had assembled together and made a resolution,
+    (which they agreed to enforce as the law of the place,) that "if any
+    person was absent from his "settlement for six weeks he should
+    forfeit his right." [Quotation marks as published.]
+
+    In the spring of 1775 the defendant came to the settlement, and was
+    advised by the Fair Play Men to settle on the premises which
+    _Hughes_ had left; this he did, and built a cabin. The plaintiff
+    soon after came, claiming it in right of his brother, and aided by
+    _Thomas Hughes_, took possession of the cabin; but the defendant
+    collecting his friends, an affray ensued, in which _Hughes_ was
+    beaten off and the defendant left in possession. He continued to
+    improve, built an house and stable, and cleared about ten acres. In
+    1778 he was driven off by the enemy and entered into the army. At
+    the close of the war, both plaintiff and defendant returned to the
+    settlement, each claiming the land in dispute.
+
+    The warrant was taken out in the name of _James Hughes_, (the father
+    of the plaintiff who is since dead,) for the benefit of his
+    children.
+
+    After argument by Mr. _Charles Smith_ and Mr. _Duncan_ for the
+    plaintiff, and Mr. _Daniel Smith_ and Mr. _Read_ for the defendant,
+    Justice _Shippen_ in the charge of the court to the jury, said--
+
+    The dispute here, is between a first improvement, and a subsequent
+    but much more valuable improvement. But neither of the parties has
+    any legal or equitable right, but under the act of the 21st
+    _December_ 1784. The settlement on this land was against law. It was
+    an offence that tended to involve this country in blood. But the
+    merit and sufferings of the actual settlers cancelled the offence,
+    and the legislature, mindful of their situation, provided this
+    special act for their relief. The preamble recites their "resolute
+    stand and sufferings," as deserving a right of pre-emption. The
+    legislature had no eye to any person who was not one of the
+    occupiers after the commencement of the war, and a transient settler
+    removed, (no matter how,) is not an object of the law. This is our
+    construction of the act. _James Hughes_ under whom the plaintiff
+    claims, died before the war, the other occupied the premises after,
+    and in the language of the act, "stood and suffered." If this
+    construction be right, the cause is at an end.
+
+    Besides, the plaintiff claims as the heir of _Thomas_, who was the
+    heir of _James_, the first settler. I will not say that the fair
+    play men could make a law to bind the settlers; but they might by
+    agreement bind themselves. Now _Thomas_ was one of these, and was
+    bound by his conduct, from disputing the right of the defendant.
+
+    This warrant it seems, is taken out in the name of the father, and
+    it is said, as a trustee for his children. It is sometimes done for
+    the benefit of all concerned. If this be the case, it may be well
+    enough; but still it is not so regular, as it might have been[.]
+    With these observations, we submit it to you.
+
+                                        Verdict for the defendant.[29]
+
+This case, although originated in the Northumberland County Court in
+1786, was appealed to the State Supreme Court, where the lower court
+decision was affirmed in 1791. The summary runs the gamut of Fair Play
+procedures from settlement, through questions of tenure, to ejectment.
+Its completeness indicates its usefulness. Partial and occasional
+depositions in the other cases cited help to round out the picture of
+the Fair Play "code."
+
+For example, the right of settlement included not only the approval of
+the Fair Play men, but also the acceptance of the prospective
+landholder by his neighbors. Allusions to this effect are made in the
+Coldren deposition as well as in the Huff-Latcha case. Eleanor Coldren's
+deposition, made at Sunbury, June 7, 1797, concerns the disputed title
+to certain lands of her deceased husband, Abraham Dewitt, opposite the
+Great Island. Her comments about neighbor approval demonstrate the
+point. She says, for instance, that
+
+    ... in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and Cookson Long, two of the
+    Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the deponent's house, next below
+    Barnabas Bonner's Improvement, where Deponent's Husband kept a
+    Tavern, and heard Antes and Long say that they (meaning the
+    Fair-Play Men) and the Neighbors of the Settlement had unanimously
+    agreed that James Irvin, James Parr, Abraham Dewitt and Barnabas
+    Bonner should ... have their Improvement Rights fitted....
+
+She speaks of the resolution of the claims problem "as being the
+unanimous agreement of the Neighbors and Fair-Play Men...."[30]
+
+William King, who temporarily claimed part of the land involved in the
+dispute between Edmund Huff and Jacob Latcha, also refers to neighbor
+approval in his deposition taken in that case. He said, "I first went to
+Edmund Huff, then to Thomas Kemplen, Samuel Dougherty, William McMeans,
+and Thomas Ferguson, and asked if they would accept me as a
+neighbor...."[31]
+
+Land tenure policy is noted by this same William King in the case of
+_James Grier_ vs. _William Tharpe_. Repeating what we have already
+pointed out in the case of _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, King testified that
+"there was a law among the Fair-play men by which any man, who absented
+himself for the space of six weeks, lost his right to his
+improvement."[32] In the Huff-Latcha case, King recounts the case of one
+Joseph Haines who "had once a right ... but had forfeited his right by
+the Fair-play law...."[33]
+
+The forfeiture rule was tempered, however, in cases involving military
+service. Bratton Caldwell's deposition in _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_ is a case
+in point. Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men in 1776, declared that
+"Greer went into the army in 1776 and was a wagon-master till the fall
+of 1778.... In July, 1778, the Runaway, John Martin, had come on the
+land in his absence. The Fair-play men put Greer in possession. If a man
+went into the army, the Fair-play men protected his property."[34]
+Meginness mentions a similar decision in the case of John Toner and
+Morgan Sweeney.[35] Sweeney had attempted to turn a lease for
+improvements in Toner's behalf to possession for himself, but the
+Northumberland County Court honored the Fair Play rule concerning
+military service and decided in favor of Toner.
+
+The summary process of ejectment utilized by the Fair Play men,
+occasionally with militia support, is evident from William King's
+deposition in the Huff-Latcha case. King, having sold his right to one
+William Paul, recounts the method as follows:
+
+    William Paul went on the land and finished his cabin. Soon after a
+    party b[r]ought Robert Arthur and built a cabin near Paul's in which
+    Arthur lived. Paul applied to the Fair-play men who decided in favor
+    of Paul. Arthur would not go off. Paul made a complaint to the
+    company at a muster at Quinashahague[36] that Arthur still lived on
+    the land and would not go off, although the Fair-play men had
+    decided against him. I was one of the officers at that time and we
+    agreed to come and run him off. The most of the company came down as
+    far as Edmund Huff's who kept Stills. We got a keg of whisk[e]y and
+    proceeded to Arthur's cabin. He was at home with his rifle in his
+    hand and his wife had a bayonet on a stick, and they threatened
+    death to the first person who would enter the house. The door was
+    shut and Thomas Kemplen, our captain, made a run at the door, burst
+    it open and instantly seized Arthur by the neck. We pulled down the
+    cabin, threw it into the river, lashed two canoes together and put
+    Arthur and his family and his goods into them and sent them down the
+    river. William Paul then lived undisturbed upon the land until the
+    Indians drove us all away.[37] William Paul was then (1778) from
+    home on a militia tour.[38]
+
+Although land disputes offer documentary evidence of the Fair Play
+system, it seems quite likely that the tribunal's jurisdiction extended
+to other matters. A few anecdotes, obviously based quite tenuously upon
+hearsay, will suffice to illustrate. Joseph Antes, son of Colonel Henry
+Antes, used to tell this story: It seems that one Francis Clark, who
+lived just west of Jersey Shore in the Fair Play territory, gained
+possession of a dog which belonged to an Indian. Upon learning of this,
+the Indian appealed to the Fair Play men, who ordered Clark's arrest and
+trial for the alleged theft. Clark was convicted and sentenced to be
+lashed. The punishment was to be inflicted by a person decided by lot,
+the responsibility falling upon the man drawing the red grain of corn
+from a bag containing grains of corn for each man present. Philip Antes
+was the reluctant "winner." The Indian, seeing that the decision of the
+"court" was to be carried out immediately, magnanimously suggested that
+banishment would serve better than flogging. Clark agreed and left for
+the Nippenose Valley, where his settlement is a matter of record.[39]
+
+Another anecdote, if true, gives further testimony to the justice of
+Fair Play. In this instance, a minister and school teacher named Kincaid
+faced the Fair Play tribunal on the charge of abusing his family. Tried
+and convicted, he was sentenced to be ridden on a rail for his
+offense.[40] Here again, the tale, though legendary, is made plausible
+by the established fact of Kincaid's residence in the area.[41]
+
+Doubtless the most notable political action of the Fair Play settlers is
+their declaration of independence, which Meginness calls "a remarkable
+coincidence" because "it took place about the same time that the
+Declaration was signed in Philadelphia!"[42] Aware, as were many of the
+American colonists in the spring and summer of 1776, that independence
+was being debated in Philadelphia, these West Branch pioneers decided to
+absolve themselves from all allegiance to the Crown and declare their
+own independence. Meeting under a large elm on the west bank of Pine
+Creek, mistakenly known as the "Tiadaghton Elm," the Fair Play men and
+settlers simply resolved their own right of self-determination, a
+principle upon which they had been acting for some time. Unfortunately,
+no record of the resolution has been preserved--if it was actually
+written. However, the names of the supposed signers, all bona fide Fair
+Play settlers, have been passed down to the present.[43]
+
+As every careful historian knows, no declaration was signed in
+Philadelphia on July 4, 1776, except by the clerk and presiding officer
+of the Continental Congress. Consequently, the Pine Creek story arouses
+justifiable skepticism. However, there does seem to be some evidence to
+substantiate this famous act.
+
+First of all, Fithian's _Journal_ gives insight into the possible
+motivation for such independent action. In an entry for Thursday, July
+27, 1775, he writes of reviewing "the 'Squires Library," noting that
+"After some Perusal I fix'd in the Farmer's memorable Letters."[44]
+Fithian was reading John Dickinson's _Letters from a Farmer in
+Pennsylvania_, which he had come across in the library of John Fleming,
+his host for a week in the West Branch Valley. Dickinson's dozen
+uncompromising epistles in opposition to the Grenville and Townshend
+programs both inspired and incited liberty-lovers. Furthermore, Fleming
+himself was a leader among the Fair Play settlers, and may have been
+aroused to action by the eloquence of Dickinson's expression. Every idea
+is an incitement to action and the ideas of _Letters from a Farmer_,
+which made Dickinson the chief American propagandist prior to Thomas
+Paine, reached into the frontier of the West Branch Valley.
+
+The best contemporary evidence in support of the Pine Creek declaration
+is found in the widow's pension application of Anna Jackson Hamilton,
+daughter-in-law of Alexander Hamilton, who was one of the early settlers
+and a prominent leader along the West Branch of the Susquehanna. Mrs.
+Hamilton, whose pension application and accompanying statement were
+made in 1858, lived within one mile of the reputedly historic elm. In
+her sworn statement she says, "I remember well the day independence was
+declared on the plains of Pine Creek, seeing such numbers flocking
+there, and Independence being all the talk, I had a knolege of what was
+doing."[45] Her son John corroborates this in his statement that "She
+and an old colored woman are the only persons now living in the country
+who remembers the meeting of the 4th of July, 1776, at Pine Creek. She
+remembers it well."[46] Mrs. Hamilton was ninety years old at the time
+of her declaration, which was made some eighty-two years after the
+celebrated event.[47]
+
+Following the outbreak of the Revolution and the meeting of the Second
+Continental Congress, the Fair Play system of the West Branch Valley was
+soon augmented by another extra-legal organization, the Committee of
+Safety. Ostensibly created for the purpose of raising and equipping a
+"suitable force to form Pennsylvania's quota of the Continental Army,"
+it soon exercised executive authority dually with the assembly.[48] The
+Council of Safety was instituted as the successor to the Committee of
+Safety by a resolution of the Provincial Convention of 1776, then
+meeting in Philadelphia to draw up a new constitution for Pennsylvania.
+It was continued by an act of the assembly that same year. It functioned
+from July 24, 1776, until it was dissolved on December 6, 1777, by a
+proclamation of the Supreme Executive Council.[49] Locally, however,
+the township branches continued to function and were still referred to
+as "committees."
+
+It appears from the resolutions and actions of the local committee that
+the Fair Play men maintained jurisdiction in land questions, but that
+all other cases were within the range of the committee's authority. In
+fact, a resolution dated February 27, 1776, asserted that "the committee
+of Bald Eagle is the most competent judges of the circumstances of the
+people of that township."[50] This resolution was made in conjunction
+with an order from the county committee to prevent the loss of rye and
+other grains which were being "carried out of the township for
+stilling."[51] Although cautioned against "using too much rigor in their
+measures," the committee was advised to find "a medium between seizing
+of property and supplying the wants of the poor."[52] The county
+committee even went so far as to recommend the suppression of such
+practices as "profaning the Sabbath in an unchristian and scandalous
+manner."[53] In April of 1777, the county committee required an oath of
+allegiance from one William Reed, who had refused military service for
+reasons of conscience.[54]
+
+Although Bald Eagle Township did not, at this time, extend into Fair
+Play territory,[55] it is interesting to note that the local committee,
+whose three members frequently changed, often included settlers from
+that territory or those who were in close association with the Fair Play
+men.[56] The Revolution apparently gave a certain quasi-legality to the
+claims of the "outlaws" of the West Branch Valley.
+
+One further political note is worthy of mention. After Lexington and
+Concord and the formation of the various committees of safety, the
+civil officers of Bald Eagle Township, that is to say the constable,
+supervisor, and overseers, were often chosen from among settlers on the
+borders of, or actually in, Fair Play territory.[57]
+
+The politics of fair play then was nothing more than that--fair play. It
+was a pragmatic system which the necessities of the frontier experience,
+more than national or ethnic origin, had developed. The "codes" of
+operation represented a consensus, equally, freely, and fairly arrived
+at--a common "law" based upon general agreement and practical
+acceptance. There were subsequent appeals to regular courts of law, but,
+surprisingly enough, in every instance the fairness of the judgments was
+sustained. No Fair Play decision was reversed. Furthermore, the
+frequency of elections and the use of the principle of rotation in
+office were additional assurances against the usurpation of power by any
+small clique or ruling class. Popular sovereignty, political equality,
+and popular consultation--these were the basic elements of fair play.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] _Colonial Records_, X, 95. The Fair Play settlers were outlawed by a
+proclamation of the Council signed by Governor John Penn on Sept. 20,
+1773. The proclamation was issued "strictly enjoyning and requiring all
+and every Person and Persons, already settled or Residing on any Lands
+beyond the Boundary Line of the Last Indian Purchase, immediately to
+evacuate their illegal Settlements, and to depart and remove themselves
+from the said Lands without Delay, on pain of being prosecuted with the
+utmost rigour of the Law." The "Last Indian Purchase" referred to here
+is, of course, the Stanwix Treaty of 1768.
+
+[2] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[3] Richard W. Leopold and Arthur S. Link (eds.), _Problems in American
+History_ (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957), p. 22. The entire first
+problem in this excellent text deals with the question of authority in
+American government.
+
+[4] This Fair Play system was certainly not unique, for other frontier
+societies employed the same technique, even down to the ruling tribunal
+of three members. See Solon and Elizabeth Buck, _The Planting of
+Civilization in Western Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431, 451.
+However, it must be pointed out that the Bucks' "Fair Play" reference is
+based on Smith, _Laws_, II, 195, which Samuel P. Bates used in "a
+general application of the practice to W. Pa. areas after 1768," in his
+_History of Greene County, Pennsylvania_ (Chicago, 1888). This was the
+interpretation given in a letter from Dr. Alfred P. James to the author,
+July 17, 1963. Dr. James also says that "It is possible that there are
+evidences of Fair Play Men titles in the court records of Washington and
+Greene Counties."
+
+[5] This designation was often employed to classify those settlers who
+took up lands beyond the limits of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768,
+that is to say, west of Lycoming Creek on the north side of the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna.
+
+[6] Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," p.
+5. Mrs. Russell, whose historical accuracy can be verified through her
+indicated sources, refers to old borough minutes of Jersey Shore as her
+source for the names of the tribunal of 1776, namely, Bartram Caldwell,
+John Walker, and James Brandon. Upon discussing the matter with her, I
+learned that a clipping from an old Jersey Shore paper, now lost, which
+described the minutes, was her actual source. However, adequate
+documentation and meticulous research characterize her work.
+Furthermore, Bratton Caldwell (he signed his name Bartram) is also
+labeled a Fair Play official by Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play
+Settlers, 1773-1785," p. 422. Linn's identification comes in the case of
+_Greer_ vs. _Tharpe_, Greer's case being a pre-emption claim on the
+basis of military service.
+
+[7] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," _Now and Then_, XII (1959), 220-222.
+The deposition reads "That in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and
+Cookson Long, two of the Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the
+deponent's house...."
+
+[8] Oscar T. Barck, Jr. and Hugh T. Lefler, _Colonial America_ (New
+York, 1958), pp. 258-260. Although Barck and Lefler indicate in this
+section on "The Colonial Franchise" that universal suffrage did not
+prevail in the colonies, they do note the significance of "free land,"
+of which Fair Play territory was an excellent example.
+
+[9] _Ibid_, p. 260.
+
+[10] William Cooke to James Tilghman, _Pennsylvania Archives_, First
+Series, XII, 286-287.
+
+[11] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Fourth Series, III, 545-546.
+
+[12] _Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts
+of Pennsylvania_ (Harrisburg, 1896), I, 390, 392, 394-418.
+
+[13] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[14] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 424. This six
+weeks provision is noted in the deposition of John Sutton in the case of
+_William Greer_ vs. _William Tharpe_, dated March 13, 1797.
+
+[15] _Ibid._, 422. Bratton Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men, indicates
+this practice in his deposition in the _Greer_ vs. _Tharpe_ case.
+
+[16] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[17] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424.
+William King, in his deposition taken March 15, 1801, in _Huff_ vs.
+_Satcha_ [sic], in the Circuit Court of Lycoming County, notes the use
+of a company of militia, of which he was an officer, to eject a settler.
+Linn errs in his reference to the defendant as "Satcha." The man's name
+was Latcha, according to the Appearance Docket Commencing 1797, No. 2,
+Lycoming County.
+
+[18] _See_ nn. 6 and 7, p. 33.
+
+[19] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195. _See also_, pp. 31 and 32, this chapter, in
+which the excerpt from this source is quoted verbatim.
+
+[20] _Supra_, p. 33.
+
+[21] _Infra_, Chapter Six. The question of leadership in conjunction
+with the problems of this frontier is discussed in Chapter Six.
+
+[22] The Appearance Dockets and Files were checked for Northumberland
+County from 1784 to 1795 and for Lycoming County from 1795 to 1801.
+These records, obtained in the offices of the respective prothonotaries,
+produced thirty-seven cases in Northumberland and twenty-two in Lycoming
+County dealing with former Fair Play settlers. Unfortunately, only four
+were reviews of actual Fair Play decisions.
+
+[23] Northumberland County originated in 1772 and Lycoming County in
+1795. Clinton County was not created until 1839.
+
+[24] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (Philadelphia, 1857), p. 172.
+
+[25] The cases referred to here are: _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, _Huff_
+vs. _Satcha_, and _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_. They were located in the
+Appearance Dockets of Lycoming and Northumberland counties in the
+respective prothonotaries' offices. _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_ appears in
+the Northumberland County Docket for November, 1783, to August, 1786, in
+the February term of the Court of Common Pleas, file 42. Both the Huff
+and Grier cases were found in the Lycoming County Docket No. 2,
+commencing 1797, court terms and file numbers indicated as follows:
+_Huff_ vs. _Satcha_, February, 1799, #2, and _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_, May,
+1800, #41. A partial deposition by Eleanor Coldren, _Now and Then_, XII
+(1959), 220-222, was also employed. Although the case appears to be
+_Dewitt_ vs. _Dunn_, I could not locate it in the Appearance Dockets.
+Depositions taken in the Huff and Grier cases were published in Linn,
+"Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424.
+
+[26] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 205.
+
+[27] Jasper Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I (Philadelphia, 1817),
+497-498.
+
+[28] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[29] Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I, 497-498.
+
+[30] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[31] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 422.
+
+[32] _Ibid._
+
+[33] _Ibid._
+
+[34] _Ibid._
+
+[35] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 469.
+
+[36] Now Linden, in Woodward Township, a few miles west of Williamsport.
+
+[37] King refers here to the Great Runaway of 1778.
+
+[38] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 423-424.
+
+[39] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 470.
+
+[40] _Ibid._, p. 471.
+
+[41] D. S. Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_ (Lock Haven,
+1875), pp. 207-208. Maynard has reprinted here some excerpts from John
+Hamilton's "Early Times on the West Branch," which was published in the
+Lock Haven _Republican_ in 1875. Unfortunately, recurrent floods
+destroyed most of the newspaper files, and copies of this series are not
+now available. John Hamilton was a third-generation descendant of
+Alexander Hamilton, one of the original Fair Play settlers.
+
+[42] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), p. 193.
+
+[43] _Ibid._ An alleged copy of the declaration published in _A Picture
+of Clinton County_ (Lock Haven, 1942), p. 38, is clearly spurious. The
+language of this Pennsylvania Writers' project of the W.P.A. is
+obviously twentieth-century, and it contains references to events which
+had not yet occurred.
+
+[44] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 72.
+
+[45] Muncy Historical Society, Muncy, Pa., Wagner Collection, Anna
+Jackson Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions,
+Dec. 16, 1858.
+
+[46] _Ibid._, John Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of
+Pensions, May 27, 1859.
+
+[47] The veracity of the witness is an important question here.
+Meginness, in his 1857 edition, devotes a footnote, p. 168, to this
+remarkable woman who was in full possession of her faculties at the
+time. The Rev. John Grier, son-in-law of Mrs. Hamilton and brother of
+Supreme Court Justice Robert C. Grier, wrote to President Buchanan on
+Nov. 12, 1858, (Wagner Collection), stating that "Mrs. Hamilton is one
+of the most intelligent in our community." Buchanan then wrote an
+affidavit in support of Grier's statements to the Commissioner of
+Pensions, Nov. 27, 1858, (Wagner Collection). Aside from the
+declarations of Mrs. Hamilton and her son, the only other support, and
+this is hearsay, is found in the account of an alleged conversation
+between W. H. Sanderson and Robert Couvenhoven, the famed scout. W. H.
+Sanderson, _Historical Reminiscences_, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker (Altoona,
+1920), pp. 6-8. Here again, the fact that the reminiscences were not
+recorded until some seventy years after the "chats" raises serious
+doubts.
+
+[48] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Fourth Series, III, 545.
+
+[49] _Ibid._, p. 546.
+
+[50] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473.
+
+[51] _Ibid._
+
+[52] _Ibid._
+
+[53] _Ibid._
+
+[54] _Ibid._ _See also_ John H. Carter, "The Committee of Safety of
+Northumberland County," _The Northumberland County Historical Society
+Proceedings and Addresses_, XVIII (1950), 44-45.
+
+[55] _See_ map of the Fair Play territory in Chapter One.
+
+[56] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 469. _See also_,
+Carter, "The Committee of Safety," pp. 33-45, for a full account of the
+activities of the Committee. Carter notes that the county committee
+consisted of thirty-three members, three from each of the eleven
+townships chosen for a period of six months.
+
+[57] _Ibid._, pp. 472-474.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER FOUR
+
+_The Farmers' Frontier_
+
+
+The economy of the West Branch Valley was basically agrarian--a farmers'
+frontier. The "new order of Americanism"[1] which arose on this frontier
+was in part due to the cultural background of its inhabitants, the
+knowledge and traditional values which they had brought with them. It
+was further influenced by the frontier status of the region itself--an
+area of virgin land in the earliest stages of development. And finally,
+it was affected by the physical characteristics of the territory,
+particularly the mountains which separated these settlers from the more
+established settlements. It has been said that "many of the enduring
+characteristics of the American creed and the American national
+character originated in the way of life of the colonial farmer."[2] The
+Fair Play territory was typical of this development.
+
+The early pioneer, particularly if he was Scotch-Irish, generally came
+into the area from the Cumberland Valley, the "seed-plot and nursery" of
+the Scotch-Irish in America, the "original reservoir" of this leading
+frontier stock, via the Great Shamokin Path.[3] Since there were no
+roads, only Indian trails, the frontier traveler customarily followed
+the Indian paths which had been cleared along the rivers and streams.
+The Great Shamokin Path followed the Susquehanna from Shamokin (now
+Sunbury) to the West Branch, then out along the West Branch to the
+Allegheny Mountains.[4] Loading his wife and smaller children on a pack
+horse, his scanty possessions on another horse, the prospective settler
+drove a cow or two into the wild frontier at the rate of about twenty
+miles a day.[5] This meant that a trip of approximately two days brought
+him from Fort Augusta to the Fair Play country.
+
+Indian paths were the primary means of ingress and egress, although
+supplemented by the waterways which they paralleled. In addition to the
+Great Shamokin Path, there were paths up Lycoming Creek (the Sheshequin
+Path), and up Pine Creek, besides the path which followed Bald Eagle
+Creek down into the Juniata Valley. These trails and adjoining water
+routes were usually traveled on horseback or in canoes, depending upon
+the route to be followed. However, the rivers and streams were more
+often passages of departure than courses of entry.
+
+Established roads, that is authorized public constructions, were not to
+reach the West Branch region until 1775, although the Northumberland
+County Court ordered such construction and reported on it at the October
+term in 1772.[6] Appointments were made at the August session of 1775
+"to view, and if they saw cause, to lay out a bridle road from the mouth
+of Bald Eagle Creek to the town of Sunbury."[7] It was not until ten
+years later that extensions of this road were authorized, carrying it
+into the Nittany Valley and to Bald Eagle's Nest (near Milesburg, on the
+Indian path from the Great Island to Ohio).[8]
+
+Travel was usually on horseback or on foot. Canoes and flatboats, or
+simply rafts, were used on the rivers and creeks where available.
+Wagons, however, appeared after the construction of public roads and
+were seen in the Great Runaway of 1778.[9]
+
+The problem of communication between the frontier and the settled areas
+was a difficult one compounded by the natural geographic barriers and
+the fact that post and coach roads did not extend into this central
+Pennsylvania region. As a result the inhabitants had to depend upon
+occasional travelers, circuit riders, surveyors, and other Provincial
+authorities who visited them infrequently. Otherwise, the meetings of
+the Fair Play tribunal, irregular as they were, and the communications
+from the county Committee of Safety were about the only sources of
+information available. Of course, cabin-building, cornhusking, and
+quilting parties provided ample opportunities for the dissemination of
+strictly "local" news.
+
+Newspapers were not introduced into the upper Susquehanna Valley until
+around the turn of the century. The _Northumberland Gazette_ was
+published in Sunbury in 1797 or 1798.[10] The first truly West Branch
+paper was not circulated until 1802, when the _Lycoming Gazette_ was
+first published in Williamsport.[11] On the eve of the Revolution there
+were only seven newspapers available in the entire Province, none of
+which circulated as far north as the Fair Play territory.[12] As a
+matter of fact, there were only thirty-seven papers printed in all
+thirteen colonies at the beginning of the Revolution.[13]
+
+The Fair Play settler was an "outlaw," a squatter who came into this
+central Pennsylvania wilderness with his family and without the benefit
+of a land grant, and who literally hacked and carved out a living. The
+natural elements, the savage natives, and the wild life all resisted
+him; but he conquered them all, and the conquest gave him a feeling of
+accomplishment which enhanced his independent spirit.
+
+If the story of the Great Plains frontier can be told in terms of
+railroads, barbed-wire fences, windmills, and six-shooters,[14] then the
+cruder tale of the West Branch frontier can be told in terms of the
+rifle, the axe, and the plow. The rifle, first and foremost as the
+weapon of security, was the basic means of self-preservation in a wild
+land where survival was a constant question.[15] The axe, which Theodore
+Roosevelt later described as "a servant hardly standing second even to
+the rifle,"[16] was the main implement of destruction and construction.
+It was used for clearing the forest of the many trees which encroached
+upon the acreage which the settler had staked out for himself, and for
+cutting the logs which would provide the rude, one-room shelter the
+pioneer constructed for himself and his family. The crude wooden plow
+was the implement which made this frontiersman a farmer, although its
+effectiveness was extremely limited. However, the soil was so fertile,
+and the weeds so sparse, that scratching the earth and scattering seeds
+produced a crop.[17]
+
+A contemporary description of squatter settlements in Muncy Hills, some
+twenty-odd miles east of the Fair Play territory, but in the West Branch
+Valley, gives a vivid picture of the nature of these early
+establishments:
+
+    They came from no Body enquires where, or how, but generally with
+    Families, fix on any Spot in the Wood that pleases them. Cut down
+    some trees & make up a Log Hut in a Day, clear away the underweed &
+    girdle.... The Trees they have no use for if cut down after their
+    Hut is made. They dig up & harrow the Ground, plant Potatoes, a Crop
+    which they get out in three Months, sow Corn, etc., (& having sown
+    in peace by the Law of the Land they are secured in reaping in
+    peace) & continue at Work without ever enquiring whose the Land is,
+    until the Proprietor himself disturbs & drives them off with
+    Difficulty.[18]
+
+This experience was duplicated in the Fair Play territory where there
+were no immediate neighbors whose permission was necessary for
+settlement, or until a dispute was carried to the tribunal for
+adjudication. This procedure was detailed in the last chapter.
+
+Having selected a site, preferably on or near a stream, and obtained
+approval from the Fair Play men and his neighbors, the prospective
+settler was faced with the long and tedious work of clearing the land
+for his home and farm. This was an extended effort for he could clear
+only a few acres a year. In the meantime, his survival depended upon the
+few provisions he brought with him--some grain for meal, a little flour,
+and perhaps some salt pork and smoked meat. These supplies, combined
+with the wild game and fish which abounded in the area, served until
+such a time as crops could be produced. It was a rigorous life
+complicated by the fact that the meager supplies often ran out before
+the first crop was brought in. The first month's meals were too often
+variations on the limited fare of water porridge and hulled corn, as
+described by a later pioneer.[19]
+
+Homes in the Fair Play territory were built "to _live_ in, and not for
+_show_...."[20] The following description, by the grandson of one of the
+original settlers, illustrates the cooperative nature of the enterprise,
+in addition to giving a clear picture of the type of construction which
+replaced the early lean-to shelter with which the frontiersman was first
+acquainted:
+
+    Our buildings are made of hewn logs, on an average 24 feet long by
+    20 wide, sometimes a wall of stone, a foot or more above the level
+    of the earth, raised as a foundation; but in general, four large
+    stones are laid at the corners, and the building raised on _them_.
+    The house is covered sometimes with shingles, sometimes with
+    clapboards. [The latter required no laths, rafters, or nails, and
+    was put on in less time.] ... The ground logs being laid
+    saddle-shaped, on the upper edge, is cut in with an axe, at the
+    ends, as long as the logs are thick, then the end logs are raised
+    and a "notch" cut to fit the saddle. This is the only kind of tie or
+    binder they have; and when the building is raised as many rounds as
+    it is intended, the ribs are raised, on which a course of clapboards
+    is laid, butts resting on a "butting pole." A press pole is laid on
+    the clapboards immediately over the ribs to keep them from shifting
+    by the wind, and the pole is kept to its berth by stay blocks,
+    resting in the first course against the butting-pole. The logs are
+    run upon the building on skids by the help of wooden forks. The most
+    experienced "axe-man" are placed on the buildings as "cornermen;"
+    the rest of the company are on the ground to carry the logs and run
+    them up.[21]
+
+In this fashion, the frontier cabin was raised and covered in a single
+day, without a mason, without a pound of iron, and with nothing but dirt
+for flooring. The doors and windows were subsequently cut out of the
+structure to suit the tastes of its occupants.
+
+In this one-room cabin lived the frontier settler and his family, who
+might be joined by guests. Small wonder, then, that additions to this
+construction took on such significance that they were items of mention
+in later wills.[22]
+
+Once having cleared a reasonable portion of his property, raised his
+cabin, and scratched out an existence for his first few months of
+occupation, the pioneer was now ready to get down to the business of
+farming. Working around the stumps which cluttered his improvement, the
+frontier farmer planted his main crops, which were, of course, the food
+grains--wheat, rye, with oats, barley, and corn, and buckwheat and corn
+for the livestock. Some indication of the planting and harvesting
+seasons can be seen from this account:
+
+    I find Wheat is sown here in the Fall (beging. of Septr.) Clover &
+    timothy Grass is generally sown with it. The Wheat is cut in June or
+    beginning of July after which the Grass grows very rapidly & always
+    affords two Crops. Where Grass has not been sown they harrow the
+    Ground well where the Wheat is taken off & sow Buck Wheat which
+    ripens by the beginning & through September is excellent food for
+    Poultry & Cattle & makes good Cakes.[23]
+
+The amazing fertility of the soil, as noted by more than one journalist,
+eased the difficulties of the crude wooden implements which were the
+farmer's tools. Reference is made to "one [who] plowed the same spot ...
+for eight years ... [taking] double Crops without giving it an Ounce of
+Manure."[24] Scientific farming had not yet come to the West Branch
+Valley, although the Philadelphia area had been awakened to its
+possibilities through the publications of Franklin's American
+Philosophical Society.
+
+Fertile soil was practically essential when one considers the crude
+implements with which the frontier farmer carried on his hazardous
+vocation. In addition to the crude wooden plow, which we have already
+mentioned, the agrarian pioneer of the West Branch possessed a
+long-bladed sickle, a homemade rake, a homemade hay fork, and a grain
+shovel.[25] All of these items were made of wood and were of the crudest
+sort.[26] As time went on, he added a few tools of his own invention,
+but these, and his sturdy curved-handled axe, constituted the essential
+instruments of the farmer's craft.
+
+July was the month of harvest for the mainly "subsistence" farmers
+scattered along the West Branch. The uncertainties of the weather and
+the number of acres planted had some influence upon the harvesting, so
+that it was not unusual to see the wheat still swaying in the warm
+summer breezes in the last week of July. However, if possible, the grain
+was generally cut the first part of the month in order that buckwheat,
+or other fodder, might be sown and harvested in the fall.
+
+Harvesttime was a cooperative enterprise and whole families joined in
+"bringing in the sheaves." The grain had to be cut and raked into piles,
+and the piles bundled into shocks tied together with stalks of the grain
+itself. This took "hands" and the frontier family was generally the only
+labor force available. In time, however, field work was confined to the
+men of the family among the Scotch-Irish, who attached social
+significance to the type of work done by their women.
+
+Fithian's _Journal_ reveals, however, that class-consciousness was not
+yet apparent in the division of labor on this frontier. On two occasions
+he describes daughters of leading families engaged in other than
+household tasks. Arriving at the home of Squire Fleming, with whom he
+was to stay for a week, Fithian notes on July 25, 1775, that Betsey
+Fleming, his host's daughter, "was milking."[27] The very next day, upon
+visiting the Squire's brother, who had "two fine Daughter's," this
+Presbyterian journalist found "One of them reaping."[28] If Leyburn's
+comment that social status among the Scotch-Irish depended in part upon
+the work done by the women of the family, then these examples attest to
+the fact that "status" was a luxury which the Fair Play settlers could
+not yet afford.[29]
+
+Threshing was either done by hand with flails, or, if the family had a
+cow or two (and the tax lists indicate that they did), the grain was
+separated by driving the livestock around and around over the unbundled
+straw. Finally, the chaff was removed by throwing the grain into the air
+while the breeze was flowing. The grain was then collected and readied
+for milling.
+
+Gristmills were available in the West Branch Valley almost from the
+outset of settlement due to the many fine streams which flowed through
+the territory. As a result, few farmers had to travel more than five
+miles, generally on horseback, to carry their bags of grain to the mill.
+If the farmer had no horse, he had to carry his sack of grain on his
+shoulder. If the settler lived on or near a stream, he put his sacks of
+grain in a canoe and paddled downstream to the nearest mill. In the
+early days before the mills, the grain was pounded into meal by using a
+heavy pestle and a hollowed-out stump, a crude mortar which served the
+purpose.
+
+In time, the gristmill owners also operated distilleries, converting the
+pioneer's wheat, rye, and barley into spirited beverages which were
+freely imbibed along this and other frontiers. By the time of the
+Revolution, distilling was so common as to cause the Committee of Safety
+to take action to conserve the grain.[30] "Home brew," however, was
+quite the custom, and it was not long before most farmers operated their
+own stills.
+
+Self-sufficiency was both a characteristic and a necessity among these
+Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers of central Pennsylvania.
+Bringing their agrarian traditions with them from the "old country,"
+where they had operated small farms, they were bound to a "subsistence
+farming" existence by the inaccessibility of markets to the frontier.
+One diarist found this conducive to a "perfect Independence" which made
+a "Market to them, almost unnecessary."[31] This economic independence
+carried over into frontier manufacturing, if it can be called that,
+because the industry, except for the gristmills and their distilleries,
+was strictly domestic.
+
+It has often been said that the frontier farmer was a "jack-of-all
+trades," and the West Branch settler of the Fair Play territory was a
+typical example. With no market of skilled labor, or any other market
+for that matter,[32] he was his own carpenter, cooper, shoe-maker,
+tailor, and blacksmith. Whatever he wanted or needed had to be made in
+his own home. Thus, frontier industry was of the handicraft or domestic
+type, with tasks apportioned among the various members of the family in
+accordance with their sex and talent. It was truly a "complete little
+world" in which the pioneer family supplied its every demand by its own
+efforts.[33]
+
+Although the role of the women was to take on status significance as the
+frontier areas became more stable, in the earlier years of settlement
+their tasks were extensive and varied. Though they were busy with
+household duties such as churning butter, making soap, pouring candles,
+quilting, and weaving cloth for the family's clothing, it was not
+uncommon for the women to join the men in the field at harvesttime. The
+domesticity of the American housewife may be one impact on American life
+made by the Germans.[34]
+
+The children, too, were important persons in the economic life of the
+frontier family. Their labors lightened the load for both father and
+mother. With no available labor market from which to draw farm hands and
+household help, it was both necessary and useful to give the boys and
+girls a vocational apprenticeship in farming or homemaking. The girls'
+responsibilities were usually, although not exclusively, related to the
+hearth; the efforts of the boys were generally confined to the field and
+the implements employed there, although they did service too as
+household handymen, hauling wood, making fires, and the like.[35]
+
+In addition to their farming and domestic industry, the other economic
+activities of these agrarian pioneers included the care of their
+livestock and the exploitation of the available natural resources in
+their subsistence pattern of living. The tax lists for Northumberland
+County indicate the possession of two or three horses and a like number
+of cows for each head of a household.[36] There were also "various
+Breeds of Hogs" although they were not listed by the tax assessor.[37]
+Mr. Davy's comment that "Sheep are not well understood ... often
+destroyed by the Wolves ... few ... except [those] of good Capital keep
+them" may explain their absence from these same assessments.[38]
+
+Maple syrup provided the sugar supply, a fact noted by land speculators
+who touted this "Country Abounding in the Sugar Tree."[39] Anti-slave
+interests later thought that maple sugar would replace the
+slave-produced cane sugar.[40] Mr. Davy described the process as he
+observed it at Muncy:
+
+    The Maple Trees yield about 5 w of Sugar each on an average
+    annually, some give as much as 15 ws but these are rare. It is drawn
+    off in April & May by boring holes in the Tree into which Quills &
+    Canes are introduced to convey the Juice to a Trough placed round
+    the bottom of it. This juice is boiled down to Sugar & clarified
+    with very little trouble & is very good.[41]
+
+Honey also existed in great quantities in the area and was used
+extensively. Apparently the "sweet tooth" of the West Branch settlers
+was well satisfied by the ample resources for saccharine products.
+
+The trade and commerce of the West Branch Valley were strictly confined
+to its own locale. Mountain barriers, limited transportation facilities,
+and insufficient contact with the settled areas of the Province only
+served to heighten the essential self-sufficiency of the Fair Play
+settlers. The result was an economic independence which doubtless had
+its political manifestations.[42]
+
+Economic conditions have their political implications, but it was the
+total impact of the frontier and not simply the commercial restrictions
+of some outside authority which made the Fair Play settlers self-reliant
+and independent "subsistence" farmers. The farmers' frontier did not
+result from the impact of any particular national stock groups, for
+Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers reacted similarly. As the
+most recent historian of the Scotch-Irish, the most numerical national
+stock on this frontier, suggests, "authentically democratic principles,
+when the Scotch-Irish exhibited them in America, were rather the result
+of their experiences on colonial frontiers than the product of the
+Scottish and Ulster heritage."[43] The farmers' frontier with its
+characteristics of individualistic self-reliance was a product of the
+frontier itself.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 18.
+
+[2] Henry Bamford Parkes, _The American Experience_ (New York, 1959), p.
+44.
+
+[3] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 59.
+
+[4] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Indian Paths of Pennsylvania_ (Harrisburg,
+1965), pp. 66-72, includes two maps.
+
+[5] Chester D. Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," _The
+Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_, VII
+(1935), 18.
+
+[6] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 400.
+
+[7] _Ibid._, p. 401.
+
+[8] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[9] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 401.
+
+[10] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), p. 454.
+
+[11] _Ibid._, p. 458
+
+[12] Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, _Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia
+in the Age of Franklin_ (New York, 1962), p. 76.
+
+[13] Barck and Lefler, _Colonial America_, p. 409.
+
+[14] Walter Prescott Webb, _The Great Plains_ (New York, 1931), pp.
+238-244.
+
+[15] Herbert H. Beck, "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania
+Rifle," _Papers Read Before The Lancaster County Historical Society_,
+LIII (1949), 33-61.
+
+[16] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 19.
+
+[17] Lewis E. Theiss, "Early Agriculture," _Susquehanna Tales_ (Sunbury,
+1955), p. 89.
+
+[18] Norman B. Wilkinson (ed.), "Mr. Davy's Diary," _Pennsylvania
+History_, XX (1953), 261.
+
+[19] James W. Silver (ed.), "Chauncey Brockway, an Autobiographical
+Sketch," _Pennsylvania History_, XXV (1958), 143.
+
+[20] Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_, p. 11.
+
+[21] _Ibid._
+
+[22] The probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties, found
+in the respective offices of the Register of Wills and Recorder of
+Deeds, contain entries leaving to the widow the "best room in the
+house," or, "her choice of rooms." No doubt, the simplicity of the
+earlier home accentuated the value of the additions.
+
+[23] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.
+
+[24] _Ibid._, p. 341. The Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian notes the
+richness of the land in the journal of his one-week visit to the area in
+the summer of 1775. He was also surprised to find that "many have their
+Grain yet in the Field," a notation for the 26th of July. _Fithian:
+Journal_, p. 71.
+
+[25] Theiss, _Susquehanna Tales_, p. 88.
+
+[26] The Museum of the Muncy Historical Society contains examples of
+these early farm implements and offers vivid evidence of their
+crudeness.
+
+[27] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 71.
+
+[28] _Ibid._, p. 72.
+
+[29] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262.
+
+[30] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 469.
+
+[31] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 258.
+
+[32] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 171. Even
+in the more settled areas of the Susquehanna Valley markets were slow to
+develop as this note from "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 338, reported on Oct.
+3, 1794: "At present there is no Market here but if many English
+Families settle this will soon follow as there is an excellent supply of
+every necessary & even Luxury in the Neighbourhood."
+
+[33] J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1940), p. 74.
+
+[34] Arthur W. Calhoun, _A Social History of the American Family_ (New
+York, 1960), I, 202.
+
+[35] Wright and Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western Pennsylvania_, pp.
+86-92.
+
+[36] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 405-805.
+
+[37] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 265.
+
+[38] _Ibid._
+
+[39] _Ibid._, pp. 263-264.
+
+[40] _Ibid._, p. 264.
+
+[41] _Ibid._, p. 263.
+
+[42] One student of the commerce of the Susquehanna Valley made sweeping
+generalizations about its significance which can hardly be
+substantiated. _See_ Morris K. Turner, _The Commercial Relations of the
+Susquehanna Valley During the Colonial Period_ (Ph.D. Thesis, University
+of Pennsylvania, 1916). This dissertation, although claiming to deal
+with the Susquehanna Valley, never gets much beyond Harrisburg and
+seldom reaches as far north as Fort Augusta. Its accounts of roads,
+navigation improvements, and trade fail to reach the Fair Play settlers.
+This lends further support to their independent and self-sufficient
+existence. Turner's concluding paragraph is, however, a gem of economic
+determinism and bears repeating in full. Found on page 100, it reads as
+follows:
+
+"If then, the commercial relations of the Susquehanna Valley were so far
+reaching affecting as they did in the pre-Revolutionary period the
+attitude of the people on all the questions, practically, of the day it
+is only fair to say that it was these relations which promoted the
+Revolution in the Province and drove the old government out of
+existence. The political issues were aided and abetted, yes, were
+created, were born from the womb of the neglected commercial relations
+of the Province and no other section at the time had such extensive
+relations as the Susquehanna Valley. No other conclusion can be reached
+after a serious study of the history of the period."
+
+[43] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 150.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER FIVE
+
+_Fair Play Society_
+
+
+The society of the Fair Play territory, between the year 1769 and 1784,
+was indeed simple. There were no towns or population clusters, either in
+the territory or within a range of some thirty-five or forty miles.
+Furthermore, as we have already noted, transportation and communication
+facilities were so limited as to make contact with the "outside world"
+an exception rather than the rule. As we have also seen, economic
+functions on this farmers' frontier were not highly specialized. Even
+the political system, with its tribunal of Fair Play men, operated
+without the benefit of any formal code.
+
+But it would be easy, from these indications, to magnify the simplicity
+of the social structure and of social relationships in the West Branch
+Valley. If we are to consider the development of democracy on this
+frontier, we must take into account the various national stock groups
+who settled this area and, in so doing, weigh their relative economic
+and social status, the amount of intermarriage between them, and the
+ease and frequency with which they visited each other. These and other
+social relationships, such as their joint participation in voluntary
+associations, their prejudices and conflicts, and the assimilation of
+alien groups, must all be evaluated. The leadership, the existence of
+social classes, and the family patterns must, of necessity, be a part of
+our inquiry. And finally, the religious institutions, the educational
+and cultural opportunities, and the system of values have to be
+considered in arriving at a judgment regarding the democratic nature of
+Fair Play society.
+
+Fair Play society was composed of Scotch-Irish (48.75 per cent), English
+(20 per cent), German (15 per cent), Scots (6.25 per cent), Irish (5 per
+cent), Welsh (2.5 per cent) and French (2.5 per cent) settlers.[1] Due
+to the pioneering conditions under which all of these national stock
+groups developed their "improvements," economic privilege was rather
+difficult to attain. Furthermore, even after the legislature granted
+pre-emption in the act of December, 1784, the grants were limited to
+300 acres.[2] In consequence of this, massive holdings were impossible
+to maintain legally, as the customary holdings of two to three hundred
+acres indicate in the tax lists for the years after 1784.[3] In fact,
+the tax lists suggest that absentee-owners or persons outside the actual
+geographic limits of the Fair Play territory who participated with the
+Fair Play settlers were the only ones to possess 700 to 1,000 acres or
+more.[4] This fact, combined with the "subsistence farming" which all of
+the area settlers pursued, suggests a relatively comparable economic
+status for the members of the Fair Play society. Consequently, social
+status was not necessarily dependent upon economic status.
+
+Social status on this frontier depended more upon achieved status than
+ascribed status. This may have been an influence of the Scotch-Irish,
+who judged, and thus classified, a neighbor by the size and condition of
+his dwelling, the care of his farm, the work done by the women in the
+family, his personal characteristics and morality, and his
+diversions.[5] Journalists, pension claimants, and the operative,
+although unwritten, code of the Fair Play men all give corroborative
+evidence in this regard.[6] Of all these criteria, personal character
+and morality seemed to have been most important. The Scotch-Irish, who,
+like the people of other national stocks, accepted social classes as the
+right ordering of society, shifted their emphasis, as a result of the
+frontier experience, from family heritage to individual achievement.[7]
+
+Intermarriages provide a further key to the social relationships of the
+Fair Play settlers. If a small sample is any indication, the cases of
+intermarriages among the various national stock groups were relatively
+high, with better than one-third of the marriages sampled falling within
+this classification.[8] The fact that the Scotch-Irish frequently
+married within their own group was probably due to their being more
+"available" in terms of numbers. Industry and good character were the
+prime criteria for selecting a frontier mate, as Dunaway points out.[9]
+
+The ease and frequency of neighborly visits is vividly demonstrated in
+the characteristically cooperative cabin-raisings, barn-raisings,
+cornhuskings and similar activities in which joint effort was usual. The
+women, too, exchanged visits and, on occasion, gathered at one place for
+quilting or other mutually shared activities.[10] Furthermore, the
+frontier journalists often noted the fine hospitality and congeniality
+of their backwoods hosts.[11]
+
+Further evidence of the egalitarian influence of this frontier is found
+in the joint participation of Fair Play settlers in voluntary
+associations.[12] This is particularly noticeable in their attendance
+at outdoor sermons and involvement in the various political activities.
+At a time when fewer than 100 families lived in the territory, Fithian
+observed that "There were present about an Hundred & forty" people for a
+sermon which he gave on the banks of the Susquehanna, opposite the
+present city of Lock Haven, on Sunday, July 30, 1775.[13] Although
+William Colbert, a Methodist, later "preached to a large congregation of
+willing hearers" within the territory, he did not think that it was
+"worth the preachers while to stop here."[14] This may have been due to
+the fact that they were mainly Presbyterians. Colbert's reception was
+apparently fair for he makes a point of saying, "I know not that there
+is a prejudiced person among them."[15] No regular church was
+established in this region until 1792, so it appears that the settlers
+generally participated in group religious activities regardless of the
+denominational affiliation of the preacher conducting the services.
+However, as we will point out later, this is not to suggest that there
+was no friction between denominations.
+
+The political activities of the Fair Play settlers demonstrate the mass
+participation, at least of the adult males, in this type of voluntary
+association. The annual elections of the Fair Play men were conducted
+without discrimination against any of the settlers by reason of
+religion, national origin, or property. In addition, the decisions of
+the tribunal were carried out, as Smith reports, "by the whole body, who
+started up in mass, at the mandate of the court."[16] Special occasions,
+such as the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence, were also marked by
+the participation _en masse_ of these West Branch pioneers. Mrs.
+Hamilton, in her widow's pension application, speaks of "seeing such
+numbers flocking there" (along the banks of Pine Creek in July of
+1776).[17] Apparently, as Mrs. Hamilton says, most of the settlers "had
+a knolege of what was doing," particularly with regard to political
+affairs.[18]
+
+These evidences of group participation in religious and political
+activities should not mislead one into thinking that conflict, legal or
+otherwise, was alien to the West Branch frontiersmen. The cases brought
+before the Fair Play "court" and the friction between Methodists and
+Presbyterians affirm this strife. The first settler in the territory,
+Cleary Campbell, was an almost constant litigant, both as plaintiff and
+defendant, in the Northumberland County Court from the time of his
+arrival in 1769.[19] His name, along with the names of other Fair Play
+settlers, appeared regularly on the Appearance Dockets of the
+Northumberland and Lycoming County courts. The cases usually involved
+land titles and personal obligations or debts.
+
+The religious conflict is clearly seen in the journal of the Reverend
+William Colbert. An incident which occurred about twenty miles south of
+the West Branch illustrates this friction:
+
+    This is a town [present-day Milton] with three stores, three
+    taverns, two ball allies. Agreeable to its size it appears to be one
+    of the most dissipated places I ever saw. I could not tell how to
+    pass them--I inquired at one of the ball allies if preaching was
+    expected--A religious old Presbyterian standing by where they were
+    playing answered that he did not know. I then asked them that were
+    playing ball, they answered no. I farther asked them if they did not
+    think they would be better employed hearing preaching than playing
+    ball. Their answer was a laugh, that there was time for all things
+    and that they went to preachings on Sundays. I told them they would
+    not be willing to go to judgment from that exercise--they said they
+    ventured that. So after a little conversation with the old man I
+    left them ripening for destruction....[20]
+
+Colbert's journal is filled with snide remarks and caustic comments
+about Presbyterians in general and Calvinist doctrines in
+particular.[21] He was especially concerned for the "lost souls" of the
+Presbyterians of the West Branch Valley. A twentieth-century theologian
+suggests that Presbyterian dogmatism had driven the Scotch-Irish to the
+frontier; this same problem complicated their social relationships in
+the backwoods country.[22]
+
+The process of acculturation of the frontier was marked by the impact of
+the aborigines upon the new white settlers in terms of the developing
+style of life in the West Branch Valley. In fact, the culture of the
+Indian may have affected the white settlers more than theirs affected
+that of the Indian. For instance, Mr. Davy says that "the Dress &
+manners of the People more nearly assimilate to those of the Indians
+than lower down, but the purest English Language is universally
+spoken."[23]
+
+The West Branch Valley was a new world whose experiences made new men,
+rather than a transplanted old world with its emphasis on heritage and
+tradition.[24] However, the English language and Scots Presbyterianism
+were basic ingredients in the melting pot of this and other frontiers
+where the American character emerged.
+
+The social class structure of Fair Play society is rather difficult to
+assess. Extensive land holdings and material possessions were not
+characteristic of these "squatter" settlements. Consequently, property
+was not the distinguishing factor in stratifying the social levels of
+the Fair Play community. Furthermore, there was no slave population or
+indentured servant class to be confined to the lowest rung of the social
+ladder. Here, each man either owned his "improvement" or operated under
+some condition of tenancy. However, both indentured servitude and Negro
+slavery existed in the "New Purchase" of 1768 in nearby Muncy.[25] Thus,
+it was a two-class pattern, in the main, which constituted the Fair Play
+society--landholders and tenants. In addition, though, there was a
+further delineation within the landholding class on the basis of
+character and morality. This characteristically Scotch-Irish
+differentiation may have been due to the predominance of the Ulsterites
+in the West Branch population.[26] In consideration of this fact, a
+three-class structure, consisting of an elite, other landholders, and
+tenants, would best describe the social class system of the Fair Play
+territory.
+
+The elite of the Fair Play society were generally the political and
+economic leaders as well. They owned the "forts," operated the
+gristmills, and held the prominent political positions in the vicinity.
+Surprisingly enough, though, they frequently resided on the fringe areas
+of the territory and were thus able to acquire more land.[27] A fuller
+description of this elite and its leadership is given in the next
+chapter.
+
+The frontier family was undoubtedly the key social institution in
+transmitting this new "American" culture to subsequent generations.
+Regardless of national origin, the families were closely-knit,
+well-disciplined units, whose members formed rather complete social and
+economic entities. As we have already noted, the agrarian family had its
+own division of labor, with each member carrying out his assigned tasks
+and, at the same time, learning the practices and procedures of the
+farmers' frontier. It was also the cultural and educational core, in
+which its members learned their faith, received their education, and
+acquired the values which would serve them throughout their lives.
+Family loyalty was a marked characteristic on the frontier and,
+incidentally, among the Scotch-Irish. The woman's lot was severe but she
+accepted it with a submissiveness which can still be seen in some
+backcountry areas of Pennsylvania today.[28] Clannish and dependent upon
+each other, the frontier family had no use for divorce, which was
+practically unknown.[29] If the patterns and values of these frontier
+families tended to approximate those of the Scotch-Irish in particular,
+and they did, it was because the Scotch-Irish were representative rather
+than unique.[30]
+
+The church was probably the second most important social institution in
+developing a system of values and a "style of life" in the Fair Play
+territory. Here again, the Scotch-Irish with their Presbyterianism
+provided the most significant influence, and ultimately the first
+regular church--although Methodists, such as Colbert, found little to
+favor in Calvinism. Almost without exception, the wills probated in the
+courts of Northumberland and Lycoming counties between 1772 and 1830
+asked for burial "in a decent and Christian like manner," and committed
+the departed soul to "the Creator." A Christian life and a Christian
+burial were valued in this frontier society.
+
+Due to the absence of regular churches, religious instruction was
+primarily carried on by mothers "abel to instruct," as Mrs. Hamilton put
+it.[31] Prayer, the reading of the Bible, and a rudimentary catechism
+were all a part of this home worship, conducted by one or both parents.
+Baptism and other sacraments of the church were provided by itinerant
+pastors who made their "rounds" through the valley. Presbyterians and,
+later, Methodists developed the practice of gathering together in their
+cabins in "praying societies."[32] Originally consisting of neighbor
+groups, these societies, in time, took in areas consisting of several
+miles.[33]
+
+Itinerant pastors began to include the Fair Play territory in their
+travels in the decade of the 1770's. Philip Vickers Fithian learned from
+his host, Squire Fleming, that he was the first "orderly" preacher in
+the area.[34] Fithian's visit came about after he obtained an honorable
+dismissal from the first Philadelphia Presbytery--as no vacancies
+existed--in order to preach outside its bounds.[35] Although in the
+territory for only one week in the summer of 1775, Fithian's account of
+his Sunday sermon on the banks of the Susquehanna clearly describes the
+nature of wilderness preaching:
+
+    At eleven I began Service. We crossed over to the Indian Land, &
+    held Worship on the Bank of the River, opposite to the Great Island,
+    about a Mile & a half below 'Squire Fleming's. There were present
+    about an Hundred & forty; I stood at the Root of a great Tree, & the
+    People sitting in the Bushes, & green Grass round me.
+
+    They gave great Attention. I had the Eyes of all upon me. I spoke
+    with some Force, & pretty loud. I recommended to them earnestly the
+    religious Observation of God's Sabbaths, in this remote Place, where
+    they seldom have the Gospel preached--that they should attend with
+    Carefulness & Reverence upon it when it is among them--And that they
+    ought to strive to have it established here.[36]
+
+Fithian's recommendation was not carried out until 1792, when the Pine
+Creek Church was organized under the historic "independence" elm with
+Robert Love and a Mr. Culbertson as the first elders.[37] This church,
+along with the Lycoming Church, which was formed in the eastern part of
+the former Fair Play territory in October of that same year, was served
+by the Reverend Isaac Grier, who was called to serve Lycoming Creek,
+Pine Creek, and the Great Island, and ordained and installed by the
+Carlisle Presbytery, April 9, 1794.[38] He thus became the first
+regularly installed pastor in what had been the Fair Play territory.
+
+It was not until 1811 that the Presbyterian General Assembly organized
+the Northumberland Presbytery, which serves West Branch Valley
+Presbyterians to this day. In the days of the Fair Play system the area
+was assigned to Donegal Presbytery, although in 1786 the Carlisle
+Presbytery was formed out of the western part of Donegal.[39]
+
+Missionary efforts of Presbyterians in the Fair Play territory go all
+the way back to September of 1746, when the Reverend David Brainerd
+preached to the Indians of the Great Island.[40] But from that time
+until the opening of the West Branch Valley to settlement, following the
+first treaty at Fort Stanwix, nothing concerning the area appears on
+presbytery records. However, after the treaty one Presbyterian minister,
+the Reverend Francis Alison, pastor of the First Presbyterian Church of
+Philadelphia and vice-provost of the College of Philadelphia, applied
+for land above the mouth of Bald Eagle Creek and was granted some 1,500
+acres.[41] Alison never came into the region and, in fact, sold his
+entire purchase to John Fleming in 1773.[42]
+
+Although Fithian was the first "orderly" preacher assigned to the West
+Branch, the Donegal Presbytery had received an application from "setlers
+upon the W. Branch of Susquehannah" for ministerial supplies (pastors)
+in the middle of April, 1772.[43] Apparently these supplies never
+reached north of present-day Lewisburg.
+
+Presbyterianism, then, was the most significant religious influence in
+the Fair Play territory. Methodists and Baptists penetrated the region
+after the Revolution, but that penetration, although marked by some
+conflict, was not vital to the development of a system of values on this
+frontier during the period under study.[44] Furthermore, it was not
+until well into the nineteenth century that other Protestant sects
+established churches in the West Branch Valley.
+
+The extent of that influence and the nature of this frontier faith were
+central to the development of Fair Play society. Since there were no
+organized churches in the area, the family was the key agency of
+religious instruction and service. This fact, combined with the impact
+of the Great Awakening, led to the freeing of the individual from the
+communal covenant, resulting in a secularization of religion which
+culminated in a kind of "predestined freedom."[45] Consequently, the
+political implications of American Presbyterianism, which had the
+largest church membership in colonial Pennsylvania and the strongest
+affiliation on this frontier, were demonstrated in the democratic
+radicalism which the frontier spawned. Political maturity, that is to
+say, independence, was a logical evolution from religious
+emancipation.[46]
+
+In addition to the political implications of Presbyterianism, respect
+for education was a significant factor in the value structure of this
+frontier. The probate records of this period are filled with examples of
+the great desire to see the "children schooled," and specific
+educational instructions were often included in the wills.[47] The
+Presbyterian emphasis upon an educated ministry suggests that this
+reverence for education may also have been an education for reverence.
+Morality, education, and political equality and freedom--these were the
+basic tenets of this frontier faith.
+
+Despite the high value placed upon education, the educational and
+cultural opportunities on this frontier, as on others, were extremely
+limited. Aside from home instruction and the occasional visit of an
+itinerant pastor, formal education was a luxury which these pioneers
+could not yet afford. However, earlier historians of the West Branch
+refer to the existence of a "log school" at "Sour's ferry" in 1774.[48]
+Instruction in the "three R's," enforced with strict discipline, was
+given here a few months out of the year. A Presbyterian preacher who
+came into the region and stayed was the first teacher. Educational
+opportunity was extremely limited but education was highly respected.
+
+Books, too, were a luxury in the West Branch Valley. Although some of
+the wills of Fair Play settlers indicate the importance of books by
+mentioning them specifically, there was no common library from which the
+settlers could draw. However, Fithian's _Journal_ contains a note that
+he "reviewed the 'Squires Library"; so we do know of at least one
+library in the territory. Its accessibility for most of these pioneers
+is, of course, another question.
+
+Frontier art was mainly functional. Its objects were generally the
+furniture, the tools and weapons, and the implements of the household.
+Individual expressions of creative talent, these items, whether they
+were designs on the rifle stock or styles of tableware, were outlets of
+artistic demonstration. Probably the most prized and picturesque of the
+frontier folk arts was the making of patchwork quilts.[49] Although we
+have found no "Fair Play" pattern, we do know that the women of every
+frontier household sewed, and, because of the demand for bed quilts,
+every scrap was saved for the quilt-making. Colbert's _Journal_ tells of
+his dining at one Richard Manning's "with a number of women who were
+quilting."[50] Quilting parties were social events in the lives of these
+frontier women, and their _objets d'art_ were fully discussed from
+patterns and designs down to the intricate techniques of needlecraft.
+Perhaps the patchwork quilt is the enduring legacy of frontier folk art.
+
+The music of the frontier was primarily vocal--the singing of hymns and,
+possibly, folk songs. Instrumental music was confined to the fiddle,
+which one Fair Play settler felt valuable enough to mention in his
+will.[51] The fiddle also provided the musical background for the
+rollicking reels and jigs which the Scotch-Irish enjoyed so much.[52]
+That it was a hard life is certainly true, but it had its happy moments
+and music was the source of much of that happiness.
+
+Medical practices throughout the frontier were primitive, to say the
+least, and the West Branch Valley was no exception. A diary of a
+minister in the Susquehanna Valley around Lancaster provides specific
+examples of the purges, blood-letting, and herb concoctions which the
+frontier settler endured in order to survive.[53] In spite of the
+liberal use of spirited stimulants, ailing frontiersmen often suffered
+violent reactions both from their illnesses and their cures.
+
+Although the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley doubtless had
+their own mythology and folklore, most of it was passed on by word of
+mouth; as a result, little of record remains. The Revolutionary pension
+claims are filled with tales of the courage and patriotism of the
+stouthearted men and women of this frontier. A frequent claim is that
+the measures taken to defend Fort Augusta, after the Great Runaway,
+urged by Fair Play settlers who had fled to that point, saved the
+frontier and made independence a reality.
+
+Perhaps the best-known story is that of the "independence elm" on Pine
+Creek. However, as a recent writer suggests, the story of the "Pine
+Creek Declaration" may refer merely to the reading of a copy of the
+national declaration rather than to a separate document drawn up by the
+inhabitants of this frontier.[54] Mrs. Hamilton's testimony to the event
+notwithstanding, no copy of the declaration has ever been found.
+
+Another tale concerns the frequent reference to the upper Pine Creek
+area as "Beulah Land."[55] It seems that a circuit rider singing hymns
+approached a camp up Pine Creek in the Black Forest. Later, asked to
+sing, he offered the familiar "Beulah Land." Still later, he met with an
+accident between Blackwell and Cammal resulting in his death. The
+entertained were his mourners. Subsequently, they kept his name alive by
+singing the old hymn to such an extent that the name "Beulah Land"
+became attached to this region on Pine Creek.
+
+Frontier life afforded little leisure time so that recreation was
+generally economically oriented or related to some household task. In
+addition, wrestling, foot-racing, jumping, throwing the tomahawk, and
+shooting at marks were popular sports.[56] But drinking was probably the
+most common frontier recreation. It has been said that the Scotch-Irish
+made more whiskey and drank more of it than any other group.[57]
+Everyone drank it, even the ministers. In fact, the tavern preceded the
+church as a social center in the West Branch Valley.[58] Moderation,
+however, was the rule; excessive drinking was frowned upon.[59]
+
+The value system of Fair Play society can be analyzed in terms of the
+expressed ideals and beliefs, the conduct, and the material possessions
+of the pioneers who settled along the West Branch during this period.
+Journalists, diarists, and pension claimants offer recorded evidence of
+the ideals and beliefs of these settlers. Their actual behavior gives us
+some understanding of conduct as value. And finally, the probate records
+of the Northumberland and Lycoming County courts contribute some
+documentation concerning the material values of these frontier
+inhabitants. The result was a society dedicated to the idea of progress
+and oriented to a future of political and social equality and economic
+opportunity.
+
+A firm conviction concerning the right of property, that is, the right
+of individual private ownership, was developed early in the American
+experience in Virginia and Massachusetts and was reinforced by the
+experience of successive frontiers, of which the Fair Play territory was
+one. This is noted particularly in the pride in individual
+"improvements" and the vigorous assertion of property rights before the
+Fair Play tribunal and, later, in the regular courts. The large
+Scotch-Irish population on this and other frontiers characteristically
+asserted this view. Motivated by a spirit of individualism and the
+desire for a better way of life, the Fair Play settlers found land
+ownership basic to the accomplishment of their desired ends.[60]
+
+In conjunction with the policy of private land ownership, the support of
+squatters' rights tended to emphasize the equality of achievement rather
+than that of ascription. No man's position was ascribed in the Fair
+Play territory--he had to earn it. However, as we noted earlier, the
+pioneer farmer had to obtain the approval of his neighbors in order to
+settle in the area; but no evidence exists to show that this approval
+was in any way dependent upon social class or national origin.
+Furthermore, the annual election of the Fair Play men by the settlers,
+along with their rotation in office, gave a fair measure of political
+equality, which was reflected in the decisions of the tribunal affecting
+land claims.
+
+The hospitality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly stressed by
+the journalists who traveled in the West Branch Valley.[61] Despite the
+limitations of rooms and furnishings, the frontier cabin was ever open
+to the weary traveler, and spirited conversation and beverages were
+always available to revive him. Good food and fine friends could be
+found on the frontier. The frontiersman took great pride in his
+hospitality. Dependent upon outside travelers for news, the latest
+remedies for ailments, and mail, the inhabitants of the frontier opened
+the doors of their cabins and their hearts to visitors. Taken into a
+home, the weary traveler often found himself treated to the best in food
+and comfort which the limitations of the frontier permitted. Generally
+sharing the one-room cabin, like any member of the family, he soon
+learned that he was a welcome guest rather than a stranger in their
+midst. The loneliness of the frontier stimulated the hospitality of the
+frontiersman.
+
+Although no "frontier philosophy," as such, existed, the conduct of its
+inhabitants demonstrated their faith, their patriotism, their spirit of
+mutual helpfulness, and their temperance. The pioneer was not a
+philosopher or a thinker, because the rigorous struggle for survival,
+which was his, did not permit the leisure to develop these traits. He
+was a doer whose values and beliefs were reflected in his behavior.
+
+The favorable, but not always eager, reception of itinerant pastors, the
+religious instruction which took place in the home, and the frequent
+references to "the Creator" in the wills testify to the relevance of
+faith in influencing the character and behavior of these early
+Americans. Faith was not only relevant but also a matter of choice, and
+freedom of worship was practiced on this frontier. Here again, the
+Scotch-Irish Presbyterian influence may have been significant.[62]
+
+Patriotism, with few exceptions, was characteristic of the frontier. But
+loyalty to what? On this frontier it seems to have meant devotion to an
+America which developed through New World experience. Like Topsy, "it
+jus' growed," and no frontiersman wanted it taken away. The enthusiastic
+reception of the Declaration of Independence by the Fair Play settlers
+combined with the legend of their own resolutions on the question
+indicate this patriotic feeling. Despite their political differences
+with the settled areas, the West Branch pioneers were overwhelmingly
+loyal to the patriot cause in the American Revolution.[63] Their
+loyalty, however, was more to the ideal of freedom, or "liberty" as they
+termed it, than to any organization or state. They believed in and
+supported the liberty which their own hard work and the circumstances of
+the frontier had made possible.
+
+Mutual helpfulness was essential to survival in the wilderness and
+valued among its pioneers. Cabin-raisings, cornhuskings, harvesttime,
+and quilting parties are just a few examples of this spirit in action.
+Individualistic in his approach, the frontier farmer realized the need
+for neighborly support and appreciated its offer.
+
+In spite of the availability of a more-than-adequate supply of spirited
+liquid refreshment, temperance was both commended and respected on this
+Pennsylvania frontier. One historian points out that there was probably
+less drunkenness on the frontier than there was in eastern Pennsylvania,
+where it was not unusual for young men to get drunk at the taverns or to
+drink themselves under the table at weddings or at other social
+functions.[64] Drunkards were few and generally despised on the
+frontier.[65]
+
+Material values, in a society where possessions, beyond the land itself
+and the rude cabin built upon it, are limited, are best gleaned from the
+probate records, which listed the prized possessions of this frontier
+community. Beds and bedsteads are the items which appear most frequently
+in the wills of the Fair Play settlers. Occasionally, the ultimate in
+frontier affluence is reached in the form of a "feather Bed."[66] Beds,
+or feather beds, and bedsteads were so highly valued as pieces of
+furniture that they were often passed on to the daughters, serving as a
+substantial part of their dowries.[67] Surprisingly enough, the widow
+often received "the room she now sleeps in" or, "her choise of any one
+room in the house." This is not so amazing, however, when one realizes
+that additional rooms beyond the original one-room cabin quite logically
+became highly valued. Pewterware was the silver of the frontier, and, if
+the probate records are any indication, there was little of it and no
+silver. Aside from references to furniture such as spinning wheels,
+bureaus, tables, and chairs, and these not too regularly, it is quite
+evident that material possessions were few.
+
+What then was the nature of Fair Play society? The frontier, by its very
+nature, had an egalitarian influence which is readily apparent from this
+analysis of the "style of life" along the West Branch. A relative
+political and social equality existed in this land of economic
+opportunity where faith, patriotism, helpfulness, and self-determination
+were the outstanding traits. The frontier brought the democratizing role
+of achievement to the fore in American life, and the Fair Play settlers
+were an excellent example.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] _See_ Chart 1 in Chapter Two.
+
+[2] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[3] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 557-805.
+
+[4] For example, in the County Assessments for 1781, _Pennsylvania
+Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 468, 484, the individual holdings of
+resident property owners range from 50 to 1,500 acres, whereas
+non-residents' range from 200 to 13,000. Only six of thirty residents
+showed property in excess of 325 acres and four of these had 550 acres
+or less. The two large landowners were peripheral Fair Play residents.
+Subsequent tax lists indicate that non-residents eventually sold their
+property in sections.
+
+[5] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262.
+
+[6] _Fithian: Journal_ (1775) and _Journal of William Colbert_
+(1792-1794). These journals of the first regularly assigned itinerant
+pastors, Presbyterian and Methodist, to the West Branch Valley, contain
+numerous references concerning the personal character and morality of
+the settlers. In the Hamilton Papers of the Wagner Collection of
+Revolutionary War pension claimants, p. 11, Mrs. Hamilton writes to the
+Honorable George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions, on Dec. 16, 1858:
+"I believe they were people of clear sound mind, just, upright, morrall,
+religious, and friendly to all. I should say they came nearest to
+keeping the commandment, love your nabour as yourself, then any people I
+ever lived among."
+
+[7] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 269.
+
+[8] Helen Herritt Russell, "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men
+and Their Government," _The Northumberland County Historical Society
+Proceedings and Addresses_, XXII (1958), 16-43. Mrs. Russell, whose
+genealogical studies were the basis of Chart 1 in Chapter Two, notes 24
+marriages among the 80 names, 9 of which were intermarriages of
+different national stocks. Of the 24 marriages, 9 were between
+Scotch-Irish couples. Intermarriages produced 5 English-Scotch-Irish
+couples, 2 German-Scotch-Irish, 1 Welsh-Scotch-Irish, and 1
+German-English. The intermarriages appear to follow the national stock
+percentages in the population. This would suggest that the
+intermarriages were a matter of choice rather than of necessity.
+
+[9] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 198.
+
+[10] _Journal of William Colbert_ (1792-1794). This entry for Thursday,
+Sept. 5, 1793, is from a typescript belonging to Dr. Charles F.
+Berkheimer, of Williamsport. The original is in Chicago at the Garrett
+Biblical Seminary.
+
+[11] Here again, Fithian, Colbert, and Mr. Davy all mention the friendly
+reception which was theirs on this frontier. Davy, in an entry for Oct.
+10, 1794, p. 265, says, "In the Winter Sleighs are in general use on the
+Rivers & on Land & it is time of Visiting & Jollity throughout the
+Country."
+
+[12] _Journal of William Colbert_, Tuesday, Aug. 21, 1792. Here the
+Reverend Colbert refers to the existence of a class in religion among
+the group of Presbyterians, although the prospects appear none too
+favorable. In fact, he says, "I had no desire to meet the class, so
+disordered are they, therefore omitted it." Quarterly meetings of
+Methodists were also held in the West Branch Valley, as Colbert notes in
+his journal for Saturday, Sept. 15, 1792, and Saturday, Sept. 7, 1793.
+In 1792, Colbert remarks that "Our Quarterly Meeting began at Joshua
+White's today." The following year he wrote that "brother Paynter and I
+have to hold a Quarterly meeting at Ammariah Sutton's at Lycommon." Each
+of these instances indicates the presence of some sort of voluntary
+religious association. However, it must be recalled that Fithian
+mentioned no such classes or meetings extant during his visit in July of
+1775.
+
+[13] _Fithian: Journal_, pp. 80-81.
+
+[14] _Journal of William Colbert_, Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793, and
+Saturday, Aug. 18, 1792.
+
+[15] _Ibid._, Tuesday, Oct. 15, 1793.
+
+[16] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[17] Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p.
+10.
+
+[18] _Ibid._
+
+[19] _See_ the Appearance Dockets Commencing in 1772 for Northumberland
+County and 1795 for Lycoming County.
+
+[20] _Journal of William Colbert_, Monday, June 18, 1792.
+
+[21] _Ibid._, Saturday, Aug. 4, 1792: "Calvinist must certainly be the
+most damnable doctrine upon the face of the globe." Sunday, July 29,
+1792: "Here for telling the people they must live without sin, I so
+offended a Presbyterian, that he got up, called his wife and away he
+went." Sunday July 22, 1792: "... in the afternoon for the first time
+heard a Presbyterian at Pine Creek.... He is an able speaker but could
+not, but, Calvinistic like speak against sinless perfection." Monday,
+Aug. 20, 1792: "... rode to John Hamilton's in the afternoon. Here the
+unhappy souls [Presbyterian Fair Play settlers] that were joined
+together in society, I fear are going to ruin." Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793:
+"I went to John Hamilton's on the Bald Eagle Creek spoke a few words to
+a few people: I do not think that is worth the preachers while to stop
+here."
+
+[22] F. B. Everett, "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River," _Journal of the Presbyterian Historical Society_,
+XII (1927), 481. According to the Reverend Mr. Everett, whose article
+also appeared in the Montgomery _Mirror_ for Oct. 27, 1926, the
+Scotch-Irish, with the Anglicans, were the dogmatists of Pennsylvania.
+The Quakers and Pietistic German sects were anti-dogmatic. Dogmatically
+adhering to his catechisms, the Scotch-Irishman "resented the aspersions
+cast upon dogma and creed." The frontier gave him freedom from the
+Quakers who still considered Presbyterians as those "who had burnt a
+Quaker in New England from the cart's tail, and had murdered other
+Quakers."
+
+[23] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.
+
+[24] Thomas J. Wertenbaker, _The First Americans, 1607-1690_ (New York,
+1927). Wertenbaker's first chapter, "A New World Makes New Men,"
+develops this thesis generally for the American colonial experience,
+and, as Turner said, those first colonies were the first frontier.
+
+[25] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," pp. 28, 63. Clark notes
+that indentured servitude appeared in Muncy, where Samuel Wallis' great
+holdings made such service feasible. He also mentions Wallis' ownership
+of slaves, verified by the Quarter Session Docket of 1778. Wallis freed
+two Negro slaves, Zell and Chloe, posting a £30 bond that they would not
+become a charge on the township.
+
+[26] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262. _See also_ Dunaway, _The
+Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 180-200.
+
+[27] These "fringe area" participants in Fair Play society actually
+resided, for the most part, in Provincial territory and hence enjoyed
+greater stability and more land.
+
+[28] Calhoun, _A Social History of the American Family_, I, 207.
+
+[29] _Ibid._
+
+[30] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 271. Leyburn points out that since
+the Scotch-Irish were never a "minority," in the sense that their values
+differed radically from the norms of their areas of settlement, they
+never suffered the normlessness which Durkheim calls anomie--the absence
+of clear standards to follow. As Leyburn states it,
+
+    Anomie was an experience unknown to the Scotch-Irishman, for he
+    moved immediately upon arrival to a region where there was neither a
+    settlement nor an established culture. He held land, knew
+    independence, had manifold responsibilities from the very outset. He
+    spoke the language of his neighbors to the East through whose
+    communities he had passed on his way to the frontier. Their
+    institutions and standards differed at only minor points from his
+    own. The Scotch-Irish were not, in short, a "minority group" and
+    needed no Immigrant Aid society to tide them over a period of
+    maladjustment so that they might become assimilated in the American
+    melting pot.
+
+This, however, is not to suggest that minorities are necessarily anomic.
+The Jews, for example, were always a cultural minority in Europe, yet
+they adhered intensely to their own cultural norms.
+
+[31] Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p.
+10.
+
+[32] J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1940), p. 142.
+
+[33] _Ibid._ The existence of these "praying societies" is further
+substantiated in Colbert's _Journal_. During these services, lay persons
+gave exhortations or assisted Colbert in some fashion.
+
+[34] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 76.
+
+[35] Robert S. Cocks, _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The
+History of Northumberland Presbytery 1811-1961_ (n. p., 1961), p. 2.
+
+[36] _Fithian: Journal_, pp. 80-81.
+
+[37] Joseph Stevens, _History of the Presbytery of Northumberland, from
+Its Organization, in 1811, to May 1888_ (Williamsport, 1888), p. 38.
+
+[38] _Ibid._, p. 18.
+
+[39] Cocks, _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism_, p. 2.
+
+[40] Guy S. Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along the
+Susquehanna River," _Pennsylvania History_, XX (1953), p. 173.
+
+[41] _Ibid._, p. 174.
+
+[42] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 520.
+
+[43] Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering," p. 175.
+
+[44] _Journal of William Colbert_, Monday, June 18, 1792; and Robert
+Berger, "The Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, XII (1960), 274-280. According to the Reverend Robert Berger, of
+Hughesville, a few Baptist settlers came into Lycoming County from New
+Jersey, but were soon driven out by the Indians. Apparently, the
+Philadelphia Baptist Association sent missionaries to the area in 1775
+and 1778. However, not until the association commissioned Elders Patton,
+Clingan, and Vaughn in 1792 did any extensive Baptist preaching take
+place in this region. They were sent out for three months on the Juniata
+and the West Branch. The Loyalsock Baptist Church, established in 1822,
+is the first church.
+
+[45] Dietmar Rothermund, _The Layman's Progress: Religious and Political
+Experience in Colonial Pennsylvania 1740-1770_ (Philadelphia, 1961), p.
+142. As Rothermund describes it, "The Pilgrim's progress had turned into
+the layman's emancipation, and finally into the citizen's revolution"
+(p. 137). He calls "the political maturity which followed the era of
+religious emancipation ... America's real revolutionary heritage" (p.
+138).
+
+[46] _Ibid._, p. 137. It must first be recognized that American
+Presbyterianism differed from that of Scotland particularly with regard
+to local autonomy. The Presbyterian Church, like the United States under
+the Constitution of 1787, was federal in its governmental structure, and
+the autonomy of the local religious institutions was later carried into
+politics. Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 313, emphasizes the fact that
+the Scotch-Irishman's church had accustomed him to belief in government
+by the consent of the governed, in representative and republican
+institutions. The relationship between the church covenant and the
+social compact is quite direct. If men can bind themselves together to
+form a church, then it seems quite logical that they can bind themselves
+together to form a government. Fair Play democracy was simply political
+Presbyterianism. Its impact has been noted by a number of historians.
+Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 135, claims
+that "The actual means by which Pennsylvania was transformed from a
+proprietary province into an American commonwealth was the new political
+organization developed by the Scotch-Irish in alliance with the eastern
+radical leaders of the continental Revolutionary movement. This
+extra-legal organization, consisting of the committee of safety, the
+provincial and county committees of correspondence, and the provincial
+conventions, supplanted the regular provincial government by absorbing
+its functions." Becker, _Beginning of the American People_, p. 180,
+calls the Scotch-Irish a people "whose religion confirmed them in a
+democratic habit of mind."
+
+[47] Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, George Quigley's Will, p.
+69.
+
+[48] Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_, p. 208.
+
+[49] Carrie A. Hall and Rose G. Kretsinger, _The Romance of the
+Patchwork Quilt in America_ (New York, 1935), p. 27.
+
+[50] _Journal of William Colbert_, Thursday, Sept. 5, 1793.
+
+[51] Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, William Chatham's Will,
+p. 177. Chatham's bequest is "To Robert Devling My Fidel."
+
+[52] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 196.
+
+[53] Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary (1716-1791), microfilm transcript, 2
+rolls, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg. An
+example, found on p. 252, is this "_famous American Receipt for the
+Rheumatism_. Take of garlic two cloves, of gum ammoniac, one drachm;
+blend them by bruising together. Make them into two or three bolus's
+with fair water and swallow one at night and the other in the morning.
+Drink strong sassafras tea while using these. It banishes also
+contractions of the joints. 100 pounds been given for this."
+
+[54] Rebecca F. Gross, "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven _Express_,
+Aug. 3, 1963, p. 4.
+
+[55] Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, VIII (1947), 257-258.
+
+[56] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 193.
+
+[57] _Ibid._, p. 197.
+
+[58] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222. Mrs. Coldren refers to
+a tavern, just west of Chatham's Run, in the spring of 1775. The first
+church appeared in 1792.
+
+[59] "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," _Now and Then_, X (1954), 307. The
+diarist tells of a tavernkeeper who refused a man a pint of wine because
+"he had had enough" (Thursday, July 24, 1794).
+
+[60] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 148-150. Leyburn suggests, and the
+Fair Play settlers demonstrate, that Ulster and America were similar
+experiences. He says (p. 148) that the Scotch-Irish "lived on land in
+both regions often forcibly taken from the natives. The confiscation
+itself was declared legal by the authorities, and the actual settlement
+was made in the conviction that the land was now rightfully theirs.
+Might makes right--at least in the matter of life and land ownership."
+
+[61] _Fithian: Journal_, the _Journal of William Colbert_, and "Mr.
+Davy's Diary" all refer to the hospitality of the people of this
+frontier. For example, Fithian speaks of his hosts as "sociable, kind";
+while Colbert constantly mentions the "liberty" which he enjoyed in the
+various homes which he visited.
+
+[62] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 146-147. Leyburn suggests that
+belief in the superiority of the Presbyterian church to any king
+justifies revolt; if one may, others may, leading to anarchy. Thus
+freedom of worship for a minority allied itself in America with liberty
+of worship for all. The right of revolution, as it was acted upon in
+America, was also implied.
+
+[63] Loyalists in the West Branch Valley suffered the usual privations
+as this excerpt from the "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310,
+indicates: "_Thursday, July 24, 1794_.... Mr. Witteker and his family
+are of the people called Quakers but was turned out of the society
+during the time of war for paing the money called substitute [relief
+from the draft]* money to the Congress agents. M[r]. W's case is really
+hard. He suffered as above by his friends for aiding Congress and his
+estate was conviscated [_sic_] by the state for being a loyalist."
+[*Phrase bracketed in quotation.]
+
+[64] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 197-198.
+
+[65] _Ibid._, p. 198. An example of this attitude is found in this entry
+in the "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310: "This afternoon 24 July
+[1794] a person with two horses, one he rode, the other lead, called at
+Wittekers for a pint of wine, but on account of him being intoxicated
+before Mr. W. told him he had had enough & would not let him have any.
+Where could we find so disinterested a tavernkeeper in England? In
+England they never refuse as long as they pay, but here the man had the
+money ready if they would let him have the wine."
+
+[66] This conclusion was reached after the reading of some three hundred
+wills in the probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties.
+This particular reference is from James Caldwell's will, Nov. 20, 1815,
+located in Will Book #1, p. 108, Lycoming County Courthouse.
+
+[67] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 22. Beds and feather
+beds seem to have been status symbols of a sort often willed to the wife
+or included as a dowry.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER SIX
+
+_Leadership and the Problems of the Frontier_
+
+
+Any analysis of democracy in the Fair Play territory must consider the
+question of leadership and the particular problems of that frontier. The
+number of leaders and their roles, the marks of leadership, and the
+circumstances which brought certain men to the fore must all be
+considered. Was there some correlation between property-holdings, or
+national origin, and leadership? Were there certain offices conducive to
+the exercise of leadership? The subject of leadership entails inquiry
+into each of these areas.
+
+Unfortunately, only one biographical study of any Fair Play leader has
+ever been attempted, that of Henry Antes.[1] As a result, the patterns
+of leadership must be gleaned from court records, tax lists, lists of
+public officials, and petitions from the settlers of this frontier.
+Consequently, what follows gives us some general understanding of the
+nature of leadership but offers little in the way of insight into the
+personalities of the leaders.
+
+Using the Curti study as an example, certain objective criteria have
+been set up in analyzing leadership in the West Branch Valley.[2]
+Obviously, some leaders were more important than others. Their influence
+extended beyond the limits of the Fair Play territory. These leaders,
+provided that they stood out in respect to at least three of the four
+criteria established, have been categorized as regional leaders. These
+four criteria have been used in this study to determine regional
+leadership: (1) the holding of political office, (2) the ownership of
+better-than-average property holdings, (3) the operation of frontier
+forts, and (4) the holding of military rank of some significance.[3]
+
+Of these criteria, office holding appears to be the most important.
+Thus, regional leaders were generally re-elected to public office, or
+held more than one such office. Furthermore, it will be noted that these
+offices tended to be with the established governments of the State and
+county. Since some leaders never held any political office, another
+classification seemed necessary. Consequently, the role of local
+leadership was also classified.
+
+The influence of some men seems to have been strictly confined to the
+Fair Play territory, either by virtue of their election to some local
+office or by their prominence in some other phase of community life. As
+a result, local leaders have been considered as (1) those who held at
+least two local offices, or (2) those who exercised identifiable
+community leadership in a non-political context.
+
+After an extensive examination of the lists of public officials for
+Northumberland County, the tax lists for the same period, the records of
+the Fair Play men and the Committee of Safety, the accounts of the
+frontier forts in the region, and the military records of these
+settlers, it becomes evident that only three men can be considered as
+regional leaders and not more than seven or eight as local leaders.[4]
+Henry Antes, Robert Fleming, and Frederick Antes are the regional
+leaders; and Alexander Hamilton, John Fleming, James Crawford, John
+Walker, Thomas Hughes, Cookson Long, William Reed, and Samuel Horn are
+the local leaders. Obviously, the listings are too limited to offer any
+valid quantitative analysis.
+
+Henry Antes is undoubtedly the single most outstanding leader in the
+entire Fair Play country. Judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions,
+sheriff, justice of the peace, Fair Play spokesman, captain (later
+colonel) of Associators and commander of Fort Antes, miller and property
+owner, personal friend of John Dickinson and other Provincial leaders,
+Henry Antes was the top figure in civic, economic, military, and social
+affairs along the West Branch. Influential within and without the Fair
+Play territory, Henry Antes was truly the major leader in the valley.
+
+The Antes family had long played a significant role in the history of
+the Province of Pennsylvania. As MacMinn relates, Henry's father, Henry,
+Sr., had been "associated with the most prominent men of his time in
+movements for the public good."[5] A Moravian, the elder Antes had
+assisted Count Zinzendorf in his missionary efforts, aided Whitefield in
+his philanthropic endeavors, worked with Henry Muhlenberg in educating
+the German town community, and served with a marked impartiality as a
+justice of the peace.[6] From such stock came the necessary leadership
+for the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch frontier.
+
+Born near Pottstown in Montgomery County in 1736, young Henry may have
+learned of frontier opportunity from visitors to his father's inn, such
+as Zinzendorf and Spangenburg, who had traveled along the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna. Consequently, joined by his brother William, he signed
+an article of agreement on September 29, 1773, for the purchase of land
+in the West Branch Valley.[7] When another brother, Frederick, obtained
+property in the area later in that same decade, the Antes brothers,
+particularly Henry and Frederick, became the dominant political,
+economic, and social influence in the territory. Frederick, however, was
+more of an absentee leader since he never actually resided in the Fair
+Play territory.
+
+Although the combined holdings of the Antes brothers constituted only a
+little less than 700 acres, their gristmill, the first in the region,
+became the meeting place for the area settlers, providing a forum for
+the usual discussions of politics and prices.[8] From Lycoming Creek on
+the east to Pine Creek and the Great Island on the west, the frontier
+farmers brought their grain to the Antes mill, on the south side of the
+Susquehanna River opposite present Jersey Shore. While the milling went
+on, the men analyzed their common problems and debated the future of
+this pioneer land. If there was a center for the dissemination of news
+in the West Branch Valley, it was the Antes mill and fort, which was
+soon constructed on the property. Located in almost the center of the
+Fair Play territory (although actually across the river from it), where
+men met of necessity, and having had a father who had exerted influence
+and exercised leadership in Philadelphia County, the Antes brothers were
+well prepared to lead the West Branch pioneers.
+
+With their gristmill giving Henry and Frederick a decided economic edge,
+they soon became involved in the politics of the Fair Play territory,
+Northumberland County, and the Province of Pennsylvania. Henry became
+primarily a local and county leader, while his brother concentrated on
+county and Provincial and, later, State affairs. Both served as county
+judges--Henry, appointed in 1775, and Frederick, elected in 1784--which
+suggests judicial responsibility as the key to assuming major
+leadership, since Robert Fleming took Frederick's judicial post when he
+resigned to take a seat in the General Assembly.[9]
+
+By the summer of 1775, when Philip Vickers Fithian first included the
+West Branch in his itinerary--the valley by then supported some 100
+families--Henry Antes had already distinguished himself as a public
+servant. He, along with five others, had been commissioned by the county
+court to lay out a road from Fort Augusta to the mouth of Bald Eagle
+Creek;[10] he had served as a spokesman for the Fair Play men in a land
+title dispute;[11] he had been made a justice of the peace;[12] and he
+had been appointed as a judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions.[13] This
+was to be only the beginning, for in 1775, when the Associators were
+organized, Henry Antes was made captain of company eight, embodying the
+Nippenose and Pine Creek settlers.[14] But even this is not the complete
+picture, for when the settlers returned to the region in the eighties,
+following the Great Runaway of 1778, Antes became sheriff, the chief law
+enforcement officer of Northumberland County.[15] The popular miller had
+become the popular leader, a popularity enhanced by his interpretation
+of the sheriff's role, an interpretation which occasionally brought him
+into conflict with the State's leaders.[16]
+
+The leadership of the Antes brothers is further accentuated by the
+activities of Frederick Antes. Between 1776 and 1784 he was a delegate
+to the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention, justice of the peace,
+president judge of the county courts, county treasurer, commissioner of
+purchase for Northumberland County, a representative in the General
+Assembly, and a colonel of militia.[17] With Henry on the West Branch
+and Frederick frequently in Philadelphia, the Antes family had a
+constant finger on the pulse of Pennsylvania politics. Official duties,
+plus the strategic location of the Antes fort and mill, made Frederick
+and Henry Antes the most influential persons in the West Branch Valley
+during the operation of the Fair Play system. Eminently qualified by
+numerous public responsibilities, the Antes brothers were major leaders
+of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+Robert Fleming, the third regional leader in the territory, also served
+as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas for the county, although that
+service began in March, 1785, after the Fair Play territory was acquired
+by the State of Pennsylvania in the second Stanwix Treaty of 1784.[18]
+He became a justice of the peace at the same time.[19] Prior to his
+judicial obligations, Fleming had been a member of the county Committee
+of Safety, a township overseer, a representative in the General
+Assembly, a second lieutenant of Associators, and possibly a Fair Play
+man.[20] During the Revolution, he was primarily concerned with the area
+around the Great Island, serving at Reed's Fort (present Lock Haven) and
+on the Fleming estate, which some referred to as Fort Fleming. Robert
+had a brother, John, with whom Fithian stayed during his brief sojourn
+in the territory. Their combined holdings, the largest in the vicinity,
+ran to almost 3,000 acres, of which 1,250 acres were Robert's.[21]
+
+Certain conclusions can be drawn from these data regarding the regional
+leaders of the Fair Play territory. Better than average property
+holdings, extensive in the case of Robert Fleming; judicial
+responsibility, which was true of all three men; primary authority in
+frontier forts (the Antes brothers owned and commanded Antes Fort, and
+the Flemings operated their own stockade and commanded Fort Reed); and
+military rank ranging from lieutenant of Associators to colonel of
+militia: these characteristics signified major leadership in the West
+Branch Valley among the Fair Play settlers. Coincidentally, it can be
+noted that two of the three regional leaders, having served in the State
+legislature, had influence which reached to the State House in
+Philadelphia. Obviously, these men were known outside of the limited
+environs of the Fair Play territory. In fact, both Henry and Frederick
+Antes enjoyed a more than passing acquaintance with Benjamin Franklin
+and John Dickinson, two of the giants of this period of Pennsylvania's
+history.[22]
+
+A further observation which can be made concerning leadership relates to
+the question of national origin. Although the Fair Play territory has
+often been referred to as "Scotch-Irish country," the German Antes
+brothers performed the outstanding leadership roles on this frontier.
+Also, the specific geographic location of our regional leaders provides
+a final note of interest. All three of them, Henry and Frederick Antes,
+and Robert Fleming, actually resided outside the limits of the Fair Play
+territory. They were on the geographic fringe but at the leadership
+core. Their close proximity to the Fair Play territory, separated from
+it only by the Susquehanna River, in addition to their contacts with and
+positions in established government, gave these men an obvious political
+eminence. The forts located in both places and the Anteses' gristmill
+gave both the Flemings and the Anteses opportunity for leadership.
+
+Local leaders generally lived within the Fair Play territory, had
+average property holdings, and served on either the Fair Play tribunal
+or the township Committee of Safety. There are, of course, exceptions to
+each of these generalizations. The fort operators, Samuel Horn, William
+Reed, and John Fleming, resided on the Provincial or State side of the
+Susquehanna River. Furthermore, John Fleming was the largest property
+owner in the area with some 1,640 acres.[23] And one man, James
+Crawford, held the highly respected county office of sheriff.[24]
+
+Three of the local leaders, John Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and James
+Crawford, stand out from the rest, although for different reasons. John
+Fleming undoubtedly would have become a major leader had he lived
+longer--he died in 1777. His extensive property made his home the usual
+stop for itinerant pastors and other travelers in the valley, as
+Fithian's _Journal_ attests.[25] It also made him a figure of central
+significance in economic affairs. Alexander Hamilton was probably "the"
+local leader. A member of the Committee of Safety and presumably a Fair
+Play man, he was also the captain of Horn's Fort.[26] He is also the
+reputed author of the Pine Creek declaration. James Crawford was more
+noted for military exploits than for civic duties. Prior to his military
+service, Crawford had represented Northumberland County in the
+Constitutional Convention of 1776, which framed the State constitution
+and, later, commissioned him as a major in the Twelfth Pennsylvania
+Regiment.[27] Deprived of his commission after the Germantown campaign,
+Major Crawford returned home and was elected county sheriff, an office
+which he held until succeeded by Henry Antes.[28]
+
+Of the other local leaders, Horn and Reed held only lesser township
+offices, overseer and supervisor, respectively, in addition to operating
+frontier forts.[29] Cookson Long, mentioned as a Fair Play man in 1775
+in Eleanor Coldren's deposition, later commanded Fort Reed, for a time,
+as a captain of Associators.[30] The final two local leaders, John
+Walker and Thomas Hughes, both took turns as Fair Play men and as
+members of the local Committee of Safety.[31]
+
+In analyzing the local leadership roles which these various settlers
+filled, additional and pertinent conclusions become apparent. In the
+first place, the Fair Play men were obviously not the top leaders of the
+community. Henry Antes may have served as their spokesman in 1775, and
+it is quite possible that Robert Fleming was a member of the tribunal,
+but both were more important as county leaders. Secondly, Fair Play men
+were members of the Committee of Safety, a fact which suggests that
+their efforts may have been coordinated. Finally, returning to the
+question of national origin, six of these eight local leaders were
+either Scots, Scotch-Irish, or Irish. The other two were Germans. No
+Englishman was a leader, either regional or local, in the Fair Play
+territory between 1769 and 1784. Perhaps, as Carl Becker suggests, this
+was due to the fact that neither the German nor the Scotch-Irish
+immigrant held in his breast any sentiment of loyalty to King George, or
+much sympathy with the traditions or the leaders of English society.[32]
+
+What were the particular problems of this frontier and how effective
+were these leaders in meeting them? The question of defense, including
+the daily task of survival in the wilderness, the right of pre-emption,
+and the efforts to obtain frontier representation in the assembly: these
+were the main problems in this pioneer land along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna. All were not solved during the period under analysis, but
+the attempts to solve these and other problems afford us the opportunity
+to evaluate the leadership in the Fair Play territory.
+
+Doubtless, the most pressing public need on this frontier was protection
+from the marauding Indians who plagued these pioneers throughout the
+fifteen years encompassed by this study. Aroused by the British during
+the Revolution, the Indians of the Six Nations descended from New York
+into the West Branch Valley to harass and, finally, to drive the Fair
+Play settlers from their homes. Driven from their homes, the frontiersmen
+of the West Branch first gathered in the hastily-constructed and
+poorly-manned forts conveniently scattered along the Susquehanna from
+Jersey Shore to Lock Haven, but, ultimately, these too had to be
+evacuated in the Great Runaway in 1778.
+
+The severity of these attacks is evident from this petition from the
+settlers gathered at Fort Horn, above present McElhattan, pleading for
+military support in their perilous position:
+
+    _To the Honourable the Supreame Executive Councill of the
+    Commonwealth of Pennsyllvania, in Lancaster;_
+
+    Wee, your humble petitioners, the Inhabitance of Bald Eagle
+    Township, on the West Branch of Susquehannah, Northumberland County,
+    &c., &c., humbly Sheweth: that, Wherease, wee are Driven By the
+    Indians from our habitations and obblidged to assemble ourselves
+    together for our Common Defence, have thought mete to acquaint you
+    with our Deplorable situation. Wee have for a month by past,
+    endeavoured to maintain our ground, with the loss of nearly fifty
+    murdered and made Captives, still Expecting relief from Coll.
+    Hunter; but wee are pursuaded that the Gentleman has done for us as
+    mutch as has layd in his power; we are at len[g]th surrounded with
+    great numbers on every side, and unless Our Honourable Councill Does
+    grant us some Assistance wee will Be obblidged to evaquete [_sic_]
+    this frontier; which will be great encouragement to the enemy, and
+    Bee very injurious to our Common Cause. We, therefore, humbly
+    request that you would grant us as many men as you may Judge
+    suficient to Defend four small Garrisons, and some amunition, and as
+    we are wery ill prowided with arms, we Beg that you would afford us
+    some of them; for particulars we refer to the Bearer, Robert
+    Fleming, Esq'r, and Begs leave to Conclude. Your humble petitioners,
+    as in Duty Bound, shall ever pray.
+
+                                        Sined by us:[33]
+
+This petition was signed by some forty-seven settlers, including John
+and Robert Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and Samuel Horn. Unfortunately,
+the much-needed assistance was not forthcoming, and Colonel Hunter soon
+sent instructions from Fort Augusta for the evacuation of the valley.
+This evacuation is, of course, the Great Runaway.[34] It is interesting
+to note, however, that the bearer of this petition was Robert Fleming,
+one of the regional leaders of the territory.
+
+Although forced to leave the West Branch Valley, the Fair Play settlers
+responded to Colonel Hunter's fervent plea to stay at Fort Augusta to
+help in the defense of this last frontier. Their gallant stand on the
+West Branch and their earnestly successful support of Fort Augusta, the
+last frontier outpost in central Pennsylvania, protected the interior,
+enabled the Continental Congress "to function in safety at a period when
+its collapse would have meant total disaster to the American cause," and
+provided a vivid demonstration of what a later president of the United
+States would call "that last full measure of devotion."[35]
+
+In the fall of 1778, following the earlier alliance with France, the
+tide of the Revolution began to flow in favor of independence,
+notwithstanding the fact that the Fair Play territory was now deserted.
+But for two years previous, when the issue of independence had been in
+grave doubt, the courageous pioneers of the West Branch stood their
+ground in tiny garrisons at Fort Antes, Fort Horn, and Fort Reed,
+resisting the attacking Indians at the insistence of their leaders, that
+freedom might be preserved. Perhaps it is a little-known story, but the
+fate of independence was in good hands with the Fair Play settlers of
+the West Branch Valley, who fought to preserve it.
+
+Towards the end of the Revolution the Fair Play settlers returned to the
+territory, and a new problem arose, that of title claims or, more
+particularly, the right of pre-emption. Still outside the bounds of the
+Commonwealth and organized government, these frontier squatters
+petitioned the Supreme Council for validation of their land claims.[36]
+Two petitions, one in August, 1781, and the other in March, 1784, were
+sent. Their claims were recognized by an act of the General Assembly
+passed in May, 1785.[37] By this time, the land in question had been
+opened for settlement by virtue of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784.
+Needless to say, their petitions had been prompted in part by fear of
+land speculators who were attempting to buy up their lands through the
+Land Office in Philadelphia. The prominence of local leaders, such as
+Alexander Hamilton and John Walker, is once again noted in these
+petitions. These petitions achieved notable results in that the right of
+pre-emption for the West Branch squatters was recognized by the
+Commonwealth long before the national government endorsed the principle.
+Furthermore, the validation of these claims beyond the purchase line of
+the Stanwix Treaty of 1768 provided the first legal recognition of
+pre-emption in the State of Pennsylvania.
+
+Unsuccessful in maintaining their homes against the incursive Indians,
+but successful in regaining them by right of pre-emption, the Fair Play
+settlers were also vitally concerned with representative democracy.
+Locally, on the county level, and in the Province and State, these
+frontiersmen sought to make their wishes known, both to and through
+their political leaders. How well they achieved these goals was
+influenced by the number of persons whom they elected to both legal and
+extra-legal offices at the various political levels.
+
+The Fair Play settlers managed to send two of their associates to the
+General Assembly in the decade after Lexington and Concord.[38] These
+two, Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, constituted a disproportionate
+representation, when one considers the limited population of the Fair
+Play community and the general under-representation of the frontier
+counties at this period. In fact, a few hundred families in and around
+the West Branch were surprisingly fortunate to have one of their number,
+Robert Fleming, in the General Assembly when, following a petition from
+the frontier counties in 1776, a new apportionment created an assembly
+in which fifty-eight legislators represented Pennsylvania's 300,000
+people.[39] However, the elections of both Fleming and Antes came after
+the new constitution of 1776, in which each county was given six
+representatives.[40] It can hardly be said that the West Branch Valley
+lacked adequate representation in the councils of the State.
+
+Furthermore, Frederick Antes was a delegate to that State Constitutional
+Convention. This not only emphasizes the leadership role of Antes, but
+also points up the good fortune of the Fair Play settlers in having one
+of their community participate in the framing of the new State
+government. Although the Fair Play settlers lived beyond the legal
+limits of settlement, they were very much involved in its political
+affairs.
+
+Aside from the General Assembly and the Constitutional Convention, these
+pioneers of the Northumberland County frontier placed three men on the
+county bench, one of whom was presiding judge.[41] Fair Play men became
+justices of fair play in the county courts.
+
+Concerning other county offices, the key position of sheriff was held
+continuously from 1779 to 1785 by members of the Fair Play
+community.[42] Here again, it appears that the proper administration of
+justice could be expected from Fair Play men.
+
+Locally, the rotational system of the Fair Play tribunal and the
+frequent changes in the composition of the Committee of Safety give rise
+to the conclusion that political democracy, in the sense of active
+participation in public office, was truly a characteristic of the Fair
+Play territory. Nine different men served on the three-man Committee of
+Safety from February of 1776 to February of 1777, three new members
+being elected semi-annually. Except for the two or three years following
+the Great Runaway, the three members of the Fair Play tribunal were
+elected annually.
+
+In conclusion, then, what can be said regarding the leadership of the
+Fair Play settlers? Except for the dangers from Indian hostility, which
+were compounded by the settlers' limited manpower, the leadership was
+more than adequate, one might say eminently successful, in meeting the
+needs of the frontier. It enacted law, interpreted it, and saw to it
+that the law was carried out on every political level with which the
+West Branch pioneers had contact. In short, it gave them a government
+of, by, and for themselves. This was _real_ representation by spokesmen
+of a small community, very different from _virtual_ representation in a
+distant Parliament, from which their independence had now been
+declared.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Edwin MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_ (Camden, N. J.,
+1900). This book is a mosaic of primary and secondary sources dealing
+with the entire area, rather than a standard biographical treatment of
+its particular subject.
+
+[2] Merle Curti, _The Making of an American Community: A Case Study of
+Democracy in a Frontier County_ (Stanford, 1959), pp. 417-441. This
+entire fifteenth chapter is devoted to both a quantitative and
+qualitative analysis of "leadership."
+
+[3] Wealth, i.e., liquid assets, was not necessarily a criterion on this
+agrarian frontier, where a man's assets were not easily convertible into
+cash. Hence, property was the main economic source of value.
+
+[4] The records of the first State and county officers are found in the
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 768-772, and John Blair
+Linn, _Annals of Buffalo Valley_ (Harrisburg, 1877), pp. 558-563. Some
+data are also available in Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton
+Counties_.
+
+The tax listings were located in the _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third
+Series, XIX, 437, 468, 557, and 618-622. Mrs. Russell also collected a
+listing for the years 1774 to 1800 for Northumberland County. Court
+records, pension claims, Meginness' _Otzinachson_ (1889) and _Frontier
+Forts of Pennsylvania_ provided the remaining data.
+
+[5] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 19.
+
+[6] _Ibid._, pp. 20-21. MacMinn also calls the senior Antes the father
+of the Unity Conferences of Christian Endeavor and presents a copy of a
+letter written on Dec. 17, 1741, calling for a New Year's Day meeting of
+Christians in Germantown in 1742 in support of this statement. Of his
+minor judicial role, MacMinn offers this account published in
+Christopher Saur's _Pensylvanische Berichte_ for May 16, 1756: "Were
+such magistrates more numerous, the poor would not have cause to
+complain and to weep over gross injustices which they have to suffer
+because persons are respected."
+
+[7] _Ibid._, p. 248.
+
+[8] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 484. _See also_, MacMinn, _On
+the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 324.
+
+[9] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 316, 413; and
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, p. 769.
+
+[10] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[11] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[12] Linn, _Annals of the Buffalo Valley_, p. 95; and Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 473.
+
+[13] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 316.
+
+[14] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473.
+
+[15] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+[16] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 416-420. See
+also Alex. Patterson to John Dickinson (October 28, 1783) in the Zebulon
+Butler Papers, Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre,
+Pa. Patterson, speaking of Antes' failure to arrest Zebulon Butler, said
+of Antes: "The Sheriff has not done his duty nor do I believe he intends
+it being. A party man among which I am sorry to see so little principels
+of humanity or honnor, Men who wish for popularity at the Expense of the
+Propperty and perhaps blood of their fellow Citizens...."
+
+[17] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 768-772, and MacMinn,
+_On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 330, 395, and 413.
+
+[18] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 769.
+
+[19] _Ibid._, p. 771.
+
+[20] _Ibid._, pp. 769, 771; Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton
+Counties_, pp. 473-474; and _Colonial Records_, XI, 367.
+
+[21] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 618.
+
+[22] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 12 and 420.
+
+[23] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 437.
+
+[24] _Colonial Records_, XII. 137.
+
+[25] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 81.
+
+[26] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473. The full
+account of Hamilton's military service is given in the Hamilton Pension
+Papers in the Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical Society. Hamilton had
+also been a member of the group commissioned to lay out a road from Bald
+Eagle Creek to Fort Augusta. Linn, _History_, p. 472.
+
+[27] _Ibid._, p. 474, and Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 474.
+
+[28] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+[29] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[30] _Ibid._, p. 473.
+
+[31] _Ibid._; Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I, 498; and Russell,
+"Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," p. 4.
+
+[32] Becker, _Beginnings of the American People_, p. 180.
+
+[33] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, pp. 217-218. The
+petition was dated June 21, 1778. The situation had been further
+complicated by the enlistment the previous summer of many of the
+able-bodied men to aid Washington in Cambridge, Massachusetts. These
+men, "early in the service of their Country from the unpurchased land on
+the West Branch of the River Susquehanna," deprived the valley of its
+available manpower.
+
+[34] _See_ Chapter Two for a fuller description of the Great Runaway.
+
+[35] Helen Herritt Russell, "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Journal of
+the Lycoming Historical Society_, II, No. 4 (1961), 3-10. This article
+contains a few additions to an article by the same name by Mrs. Russell
+published in _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XXIII (1960), 1-16.
+
+[36] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 518-522.
+
+[37] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[38] Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, as previously noted, had been
+elected in 1777 and 1784, respectively.
+
+[39] Dunaway, _History of Pennsylvania_, pp. 176, 196. Of these
+fifty-eight, twenty-eight came from the frontier counties of York,
+Berks, Bedford, Cumberland, and Northumberland.
+
+[40] Wallace, _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation_, pp. 105-106.
+
+[41] As previously noted, Henry Antes had been appointed judge of the
+Court of Quarter Sessions in 1775, and Frederick Antes and Fleming had
+been elected in 1780 and 1785, respectively. Frederick Antes was
+president judge.
+
+[42] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER SEVEN
+
+_Democracy on the Pennsylvania Frontier_
+
+
+One of the most often used and least understood words in the American
+lexicon is the term "democracy." In the colonial period, it was seldom
+used, except in denunciation. However, properly defined, it can help us
+to evaluate the Fair Play settlers in some understandable context.
+Etymologically stemming from two Greek words, _demos_, meaning "the
+people," and _kratos_, meaning "authority," democracy means "authority
+in the people" or, we can say, "self-determination." By
+self-determination is meant the right of the people to decide their own
+political, economic, and social institutions.
+
+Self-determination in its basic, or political, context can best be
+explained through James Bryce's definition of a democracy. Lord Bryce
+said:
+
+    The word Democracy has been used ever since the time of Herodotus to
+    denote that form of government in which the ruling power of a State
+    is legally vested, not in any particular class or classes, but in
+    the members of the community as a whole.[1]
+
+Analyzing the key phrases in Bryce's statement, we can best clarify the
+meaning of political self-determination.
+
+(1) "The ruling power of a State." Self-determination, as it is employed
+here, concerns the right of the people of Fair Play society to determine
+their own political institutions. Fair Play society did not constitute a
+state, but it was a political community, and in that sense Bryce's
+definition applies. Living outside the legal limit of settlement of
+Province and Commonwealth, these people could not obtain legal authority
+for their own rule, so, following the prevalent theory of the social
+compact, they formed their own government. The result was the annual
+election, by the people, of the Fair Play tribunal, the source of final
+authority in the Fair Play territory.
+
+(2) "Is legally vested." Fair Play society was actually illegal; that is
+to say, the settlements were made in violation of the laws of the
+Province. However, the extra-legal government which was formed was
+created by, and responsive to, the popular will. Since the actual
+authority for rule was vested in the people, it can be considered as
+legal for the Fair Play community.
+
+(3) "In the members of the community." The members of the Fair Play
+community, as previously noted, were not strictly resident within the
+geographic confines of the Fair Play territory. Communities, it has been
+said, are total ways of life, complexes Of behavior composed of all the
+institutions necessary to carry on a complete life, formed into a
+working whole.[2] Self-determination, as it is used here, suggests that
+the community as a whole participates in the decision-making process.
+
+(4) "Not in any particular class or classes, but in the members of the
+community as a whole." Bryce's definition here extends the
+interpretation of "the members of the community." Obviously, if any
+particular class or classes were vested with the final political
+authority, then the people as a whole, that is, the Fair Play community,
+would not exercise self-determination.
+
+The concept of self-determination, carried to an economic context,
+suggests that the people of the Fair Play community had the right to
+determine their own economic institutions. This means that they had the
+right to choose their own portion of land, subject, of course, to the
+will of the existing community, and to utilize it according to their own
+needs and interests. This meant that no undemocratic and feudalistic
+practices, such as primogeniture and entail, could exist. Granted that
+this is self-determination rather broadly interpreted in an economic
+context, the question is whether or not these people had the right to
+choose their own plot of ground and work it as they saw fit, unhampered
+by any preordained system of discrimination or restriction.
+
+Socially, the idea of self-determination is applied to evaluate the
+religious institutions, the class structure, and the value system. The
+application concerns, once again, the authority of the people to
+determine their own social patterns. It questions whether or not any
+Fair Play settler could worship according to the dictates of his own
+conscience. It evaluates the class structure to ascertain whether or not
+a superimposed caste system ordered the class structure of Fair Play
+society, rather than a community-determined system in which choice and
+opportunity provided flexibility and mobility. And finally, it considers
+whether or not the values of the Fair Play settlers were inculcated by
+some internal clique or external force, rather than being developed by
+the members of the community themselves.
+
+Did democracy exist on this Pennsylvania frontier? Was the Fair Play
+system marked by real representation and popular control? These
+questions must be answered before any judgment can be made concerning
+political democracy in the West Branch Valley.
+
+Was there equality of economic opportunity on this farmers' frontier?
+Was land available to all who sought it, and on equal terms? These
+problems need to be considered before we can attach the label
+"democratic" on the economic life of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+If democracy prizes diversity, as some claim, were the diverse elements
+of Fair Play society equally recognized?[3] Was the class structure open
+or closed, mobile or fixed? Did the mixed national stocks enjoy
+religious freedom? One needs to inquire into each of these areas prior
+to a final evaluation of Fair Play society.
+
+A useful tool for evaluating political democracy can be found in Ranney
+and Kendall's _Democracy and the American Party System_.[4] It suggests
+the use of popular sovereignty, political equality, popular
+consultation, and majority rule as criteria for democracy. Accepting
+these criteria as basic principles of democracy, we can begin to analyze
+the democratic character of the Fair Play system.
+
+A political system based upon popular sovereignty is one in which the
+final authority to rule is vested in the people. The question of who the
+people are is still before us today. In the fullest sense, popular
+sovereignty means rule by all the people, but in colonial America the
+"people" was a much more qualified term. It generally signified white,
+Protestant, adult males who were property owners. In the Fair Play
+territory, the ruling "people" were "the whole body" of adult male
+settlers who annually elected their governing tribunal and participated
+in the decisions of its "court."[5] Lacking an established church, or
+any church for that matter, and possessing property lying beyond legal
+limits of settlement, the Fair Play settlers could not have enforced
+religious or property qualifications for voting, even if they had so
+desired, and there is no evidence to indicate that they did.
+Furthermore, the frequency of elections, which were held annually, and
+the principle of rotating the offices among the settlers tended to
+emphasize the sovereignty of the people in this part of the West Branch
+Valley. The right of suffrage, it is true, had not been extended to
+women, but this was the rule throughout colonial America. Popular
+sovereignty, in its qualified eighteenth-century sense, was a basic
+characteristic of the political democracy which existed on this
+frontier.
+
+Political equality, that is "one man, one vote," was practiced by the
+pioneers of the West Branch. There was no additional vote given to the
+large property owners; in fact, as the tax lists indicate, there were no
+large property owners within the geographic limits of the Fair Play
+territory. Thus, each man, rather than a small ruling oligarchy, had the
+opportunity to participate in the decision-making process of the Fair
+Play community.
+
+In a democratic society, the people must be consulted by the policy
+makers prior to their exercise of the power of decision. Among the Fair
+Play settlers this basically democratic principle was vividly
+demonstrated in the case of disputed land titles, the primary concern of
+the Fair Play men. In both Eleanor Coldren's deposition in behalf of her
+deceased husband and in the Huff-Latcha case, it was established that
+the unanimous consent of the prospective neighbors had to be obtained
+before a favorable decision was rendered in behalf of the land
+claimants.[6] The frequency of elections, combined with the ease and
+regularity of assembly, provided the settlers with the opportunity to
+become acquainted with the circumstances of their problems. Here again,
+the paucity of specific data prompts us to some speculation regarding
+the nature and location of these meetings. However, it must be added,
+the Hamilton pension papers and the petitions to the Supreme Council in
+Philadelphia refer specifically to meetings at Fort Horn and Fort
+Antes.[7] Direct representation based upon popular consultation was a
+distinct trait of the political democracy in the Fair Play territory.
+
+The fourth principle of political democracy, majority rule, is probably
+the most controversial and confusing element of the combination.
+Absolute majority rule, its critics tell us, means majority "tyranny"
+and minority acquiescence, despite the fact that this fear is not
+empirically demonstrable.[8] The majority ruled absolutely in the Fair
+Play territory just as it did in the New England town meeting, and with
+similar results. However, it never restricted suffrage or public office
+to particular religious or nationality groups. Scotch-Irish, English,
+and German settlers participated equally in the political process.
+However, as we pointed out in the last chapter, the English did not
+enjoy leadership roles in the community.[9] Whether this was by accident
+or by design is difficult to ascertain. Perhaps it was just a further
+demonstration of the absolute rule of the majority with the Scotch-Irish
+and the Germans combining to form that majority.
+
+The nature of community implies shared interests and the prevailing
+interest in this frontier community was survival. Necessity undoubtedly
+caused the English minority to accept the Scotch-Irish and German
+leadership, because forbearance meant survival. Conversely, the
+Scotch-Irish and Germans could, and did, support the English in
+positions of responsibility on the basis of their mutual needs and their
+desire to maintain the community.[10] Not only physical survival but
+also economic survival were mutually desirable to Fair Play community
+members, and the decisions of the court were rendered on the basis of
+equal justice.[11]
+
+As long as minority feelings are given free expression in an atmosphere
+of mutual concern, there is little danger of misinterpretation by the
+majority. Such a climate prevailed in the meetings of the Fair Play
+settlers and the sessions of the Fair Play men; at least, there is no
+available evidence to the contrary.
+
+The nature and role of consensus in the Fair Play territory hinged upon
+what was best for the community. Fundamental agreement was reached,
+based upon mutual need apparent from open discussion. In the event of
+conflict, forbearance, which was in the best interest of the community,
+could be expected.[12] An examination of the appearance dockets of the
+county courts for Northumberland and Lycoming counties suggests,
+however, that this consensus did not extend to questions of land titles.
+Nevertheless, the all-inclusiveness of signatures on petitions to the
+Supreme Executive Council for protection from the Indians and for the
+recognition of the right of pre-emption, and the general response of the
+Fair Play settlers to calls for troops for the Continental Army indicate
+to some degree the nature and extent of that consensus.[13]
+
+Democracy, that is self-determination, did exist among the Fair Play
+settlers of this Pennsylvania frontier. There was no outside authority
+which legislated the affairs of the pioneers of the West Branch. They
+selected their own representatives, the Fair Play men, and maintained
+their control over them, a control which was assured both by annual
+elections and the full participation of the settlers in the
+decision-making process. The will of the majority prevailed, and that
+will was expressed through a community consensus reached by the full
+participation of political equals. It was neither radical nor
+revolutionary, but it was typical of the American colonial experience.
+The Fair Play settlers had not "jumped the gun" on independence,
+although they participated in the movement. They did not rebel against a
+ruling aristocracy. They simply governed themselves.
+
+Self-determination, as we have already stated, includes the right of the
+people to decide upon their own economic institutions. This right was
+asserted on the farmers' frontier of the West Branch. With free land
+available to those who worked it, provided the neighbors and the Fair
+Play men approved, economic opportunity was shared by the Scotch-Irish,
+English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and French settlers.[14] This
+sharing, in itself, was a demonstration of economic democracy.
+
+The labor system, too, was an affirmation of the democratic ideal.
+Because free land was available in the Fair Play territory, neither
+slavery nor involuntary servitude existed in this region, although it
+was found in immediately adjacent areas.[15] Free labor, family labor to
+be more exact, was the system employed in this portion of the West
+Branch Valley. Noticeable, too, was the spirit of cooperation in such
+enterprises as cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, harvesting, cornhuskings
+and the like. This mutual helpfulness was characteristic of the frontier
+and obviated the necessity of any enforced labor system.
+
+Tenancy was occasionally practiced in the Fair Play territory, although
+it appears that the tenant farmer suffered no feelings of inferiority,
+if the following case is any example:
+
+    ... Peter Dewitt ... leased the land in question to William
+    McIlhatton as a Cropper, who took possession of it after Huggins
+    left it: That the Terms of the Lease were that McIlhatton should
+    possess the Land about two or three Years, rendering hold of the
+    Crops to be raised unto Peter Dewitt, who was to find him a Team and
+    farming Utensils: That the Lease was in Writing and Lodged with a
+    certain Daniel Cruger who lived in the Neighborhood at that
+    Time.[16]
+
+Sometime later, McElhattan obtained the lease from Cruger and sold "his
+right" to William Dunn, claiming that Dewitt had failed to fill his end
+of the bargain, despite the fact that Eleanor Coldren gave evidence to
+the contrary. When challenged for selling Dewitt's land, McElhattan
+responded in a fashion which demonstrates the independent spirit of this
+lessee. He said "that he only sold his Right to Dunn and if Dunn would
+be such a fool as to give him forty or fifty pounds for Nothing He
+McIlhatton would be a greater fool for not taking it--for that Dunn knew
+what Right he (McIlhatton) had."[17] Obviously, if this case is
+indicative, and there were others, share-cropping did not induce
+attitudes of subservience.
+
+Religious freedom, in which Pennsylvania ranked second only to Rhode
+Island in colonial America, was enjoyed by the frontiersmen of the West
+Branch. It might, however, be better described as a freedom from
+religion rather than a freedom of religion. With no system of local
+taxation and no regular church, there was no establishment of religion.
+Nevertheless, this is not to suggest that religious qualifications were
+not applied to prospective landowners, potential voters, or members of
+the Fair Play community. Religious liberty had been guaranteed to
+Pennsylvanians in the Charter of Privileges of 1701, and no religious
+test was required for suffrage in the new State constitution in 1776.
+Belief in one God and in the inspiration of the Scriptures was required
+for members of the assembly, but bona fide Fair Play settlers were
+disqualified on geographic grounds anyhow.[18]
+
+There is no record of religious discrimination among the Fair Play
+settlers. In addition to the absence of a regular church, this was
+probably due, in part, to the religious composition of the population.
+The pioneers of the West Branch were Protestant Christians, and if
+denominational in their approach, either Presbyterian or Methodist. The
+friction between Methodists and Presbyterians appears to have been
+doctrinal rather than political or social.[19]
+
+The comparative economic equality in an area of free land had a
+democratizing influence on the social class structure. This three-class
+stratification, composed of property owners distinguished by their
+morality, other property owners, and tenants, was an open-class system
+marked by a noticeable degree of mobility. Fair Play settlers who began
+as tenants could, and did, become property owners.
+
+Since no one in the Fair Play territory could claim more than 300 acres
+under the Pre-Emption Act of 1785, there was little chance for the
+development of an aristocratic class.[20] It was a society of
+achievement in which the race was open to anyone who could acquire land,
+with the approval of his neighbors and the Fair Play men, and "improve"
+it. There is no evidence to indicate that the availability of land was
+restricted because of national origin, religious affiliation, or a
+previous condition of servitude. This is not to say that the judgments
+of neighbors may not have been based upon these criteria, but, at least,
+there is no record of such discrimination. The Fair Play settlers were
+eighteenth-century souls and romantic egalitarianism was not a
+characteristic of such persons. The frontier, however, broke "the cake
+of custom" and the necessities of that experience contributed to the
+development of democracy as we have defined it.
+
+A recent writer, analyzing the "democracy" of the Scotch-Irish, made his
+evaluation on the basis of the contemporary French definition of
+liberty, equality, and fraternity.[21] On this basis, the Scotch-Irish
+fail; but if we equate democracy with self-determination, the
+Scotch-Irish and the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley can be
+seen as thoroughgoing democrats.
+
+The value system of the pioneers on the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+reflected, at least in part, the democracy of the frontier. The spirit
+of cooperation and mutual helpfulness was a prime characteristic of this
+frontier, as it was of others. Cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, and the
+cooperative enterprises at harvesttime enhanced the spirit of community
+and brought the settlers together in common efforts, which demonstrated
+their equality. Individualism could be harnessed for the common good,
+and such was the case among the Fair Play settlers in the struggle for
+economic survival.
+
+Faith, patriotism, and temperance were not necessarily democratic, but
+they also were part of the value system of the Fair Play settlers. In
+matters of faith, there was a certain "live and let live" philosophy,
+which had democratic implications. Despite the conflict between
+Methodists and Presbyterians, the members of the Presbyterian majority
+made their homes available to Methodist preachers.[22] This demonstrated
+a willingness at least to hear "the other side." Such an atmosphere is
+conducive to democracy, if not to conversion. There is little doubt,
+however, that this receptivity was due in part to the absence of any
+"regular" church or preacher. Here again, the necessities of the
+frontier made "democrats" of its occupants.
+
+The most intense patriots are often ethnocentric and chauvinistic. The
+Fair Play settlers were such patriots, according to one journalist.[23]
+However, the patriotism of the eighteenth century had not reached the
+level of concern for all mankind which finds expression today. The
+pioneers of the West Branch were democrats in an age not yet conditioned
+to democracy.
+
+Temperance, particularly with regard to the use of spirited beverages,
+usually implies abstinence, which is certainly not democratic if it is
+applied in a formally imposed prohibition without any local option.
+Abstinence by choice, however, is purely a matter of self-determination.
+But in an area where drinking was a commonly accepted practice, such as
+the frontier, the term signifies moderation. In the Fair Play territory
+drinking, but not drunkenness, was condoned. The spirit of the frontier,
+or the use of it, was not incompatible with democracy.
+
+Frontier values, for the most part then, were democratic in tendency.
+Noteworthy for their attitude of community cooperation and mutual
+helpfulness, supported by a faith which could not afford to be
+exclusive, temperate in their personal habits, particularly in the use
+of alcohol, the patriots of the Fair Play territory looked to a future
+filled with promise and opportunity for all the diverse elements of
+their society. This is the democracy which the frontier nurtured. It
+flourished in the West Branch Valley.
+
+In summary then, was self-determination the central theme in the Fair
+Play territory? Did the Fair Play settlers truly determine their own
+political, economic, and social institutions? The available data suggest
+that they did.
+
+The democracy of the Fair Play settlers encompassed popular sovereignty,
+political equality, popular consultation, majority rule, religious
+freedom, an open class structure, free land, free labor, and a value
+system whose dominating feature was mutual helpfulness. The democracy of
+Fair Play was basically the fair play of democracy.
+
+Observable in this atmosphere were the traits of a developing American
+character, traits which the frontier historian, Frederick Jackson
+Turner, defined as democratic.[24] These included the composite
+nationality of a population of mixed national origins; the self-reliance
+which the new experience of the frontier developed; the independence,
+both of action and in spirit, which the relative isolation of the
+environment promoted; a rationalistic, or pragmatic, approach to
+problems necessitated by circumstances lacking in precedents for
+solution; and perhaps a growing nationalism, marked by an identification
+with something larger than the mere Provincial assembly, something
+existing, but not yet realized, the American nation.
+
+These traits, in conjunction with Turner's thesis, are a major concern
+of the final chapter. That chapter will provide an evaluation of
+frontier ethnography as a technique for testing the validity of this
+interpretation of Turner's thesis on the Fair Play frontier of the West
+Branch Valley.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Quoted in Austin Ranney and Willmoore Kendall, _Democracy and the
+American Party System_ (New York, 1956), pp. 23-24.
+
+[2] Don Martindale, _American Society_ (New York, 1960), p. 105.
+
+[3] National Education Association, Educational Policies Commission,
+_The Education of Free Men in American Democracy_ (Washington, 1941),
+pp. 25-26.
+
+[4] Pp. 18-39.
+
+[5] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[6] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222; Lycoming County Docket
+No. 2, Commencing 1797, No. 32; _see also_, Chapter Two, _passim_.
+
+[7] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217; and the Muncy
+Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers.
+
+[8] Ranney and Kendall, _Democracy and the American Party System_, p.
+47. The authors argue here that the history of town meetings in America
+and the Parliamentary system in Great Britain shows hundreds of years
+without majority tyranny or civil war.
+
+[9] Chapter Six, pp. 78, 84.
+
+[10] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770. For example, John
+Chatham, an English miller, was elected coroner in 1782, a minor role to
+be sure, but he was supported.
+
+[11] Smith, _Laws_, II, 196-197. In _Sweeney_ vs. _Toner_, an
+Englishman, Toner's property right was upheld because his absence was
+for military service, despite the fact that Sweeney, a Scotch-Irishman,
+was a majority representative.
+
+[12] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers," p. 424. The case
+cited here, _Huff_ vs. _Satcha_, saw the use of militia to drive off a
+landholder whose title had been denied by the Fair Play men.
+
+[13] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217-218, 417-418, and
+518-522. On page 417, fifty-three officers and soldiers are described as
+"early in the service from the unpurchased land." Thirty-nine
+petitioners (p. 520) sought pre-emption, a claim repeated over two years
+later by some fifty-three settlers. The petition to the Supreme Council
+(p. 217) for protection from the Indians in 1778 prior to the Great
+Runaway bore forty-seven names.
+
+[14] _See_ Chapter Two for a demographic analysis of the Fair Play
+settlers.
+
+[15] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 28.
+
+[16] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," p. 222.
+
+[17] _Ibid._
+
+[18] _See_ Chapter One for the geographic bounds of the Fair Play
+territory. The Fair Play territory did not come under State jurisdiction
+until the second Stanwix Treaty in 1784. Regardless, it must be
+remembered that settlers on the south bank of the Susquehanna actually
+participated in the political, economic, and social life of the
+community. The fact that these participants were often community leaders
+was pointed out in Chapter Six.
+
+[19] _See_ the footnotes in Chapter Five referring to _The Journal of
+William Colbert_.
+
+[20] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[21] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 311-314.
+
+[22] _The Journal of William Colbert._ Colbert had been received at
+Annanias McFaddon's (Aug. 20, 1792, Sept. 4, 1793) and John Hamilton's
+(July 23, 1792, Aug. 20, 1793), where he both preached and lodged. Both
+were Presbyterians, and, as noted earlier, Colbert expressed grave
+doubts concerning his efforts there.
+
+[23] "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 307.
+
+[24] Turner, _Frontier and Section_, p. 5.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER EIGHT
+
+_Frontier Ethnography and the Turner Thesis_
+
+
+In the first chapter of his recent study, _The Making of an American
+Community_, Merle Curti suggests that "less is to be gained by further
+analysis of Turner's brilliant and far-ranging but often ambiguous
+presentations than by patient and careful study of particular frontier
+areas in the light of the investigator's interpretation of Turner's
+theory."[1] This study was undertaken with just such a purpose in mind.
+In addition, it is hoped that this investigation will give some insight
+into the value of ethnography and its usefulness as an analytic
+technique in studying the frontier.
+
+By definition, ethnography is "the scientific description of nations or
+races of men, their customs, habits, and differences."[2] Frontier
+ethnography is the scientific description of the full institutional
+pattern of a particular group of people, located specifically on a
+certain frontier, within a certain period of time. That institutional
+pattern is described from the analysis of data concerning the political
+and economic systems, and the social structure, including religion, the
+family, the value system, social classes, art, music, recreation,
+mythology, and folklore. Also, as noted in the first two chapters of
+this study, geographic and demographic data have been analyzed in an
+attempt to picture the area under observation and the people who
+inhabited that region. It is believed that these various data present a
+fuller view of the "way of life" of these people than the earlier
+politico-military accounts of nineteenth-century historians.
+
+Of course, there are certain limitations in this particular analysis.
+This study is not meant to be typical of the frontier experience or
+necessarily representative of frontier communities. However, it would
+have broader implications if a similar study were made for Greene County
+in western Pennsylvania, where a group composed mainly of Scotch-Irish
+Presbyterians also set up a "Fair Play system."[3] Furthermore, it is my
+interpretation of Turner's thesis which is being tested, not the
+validity of the thesis.
+
+Despite the fact that the Fair Play settlers and their "system" have
+been referred to by both Pennsylvania and frontier historians in the
+twentieth century, neither the settlers nor their system has been
+studied in depth.[4] Meginness and Linn, the foremost historians of the
+West Branch, were both nineteenth-century writers, and, unfortunately,
+twentieth-century scholars have not considered the Fair Play settlers
+worthy of their study. Biographical studies are limited to the work of
+Edwin MacMinn on Colonel Antes, completed in 1900. As a result, there
+has been a definite need for an investigation collating the researches
+of these earlier historians and based upon the available primary data.
+This study is an attempt to fill the void.
+
+The seeming paucity of primary source materials is a further
+complication to the student of Fair Play history. However, letters,
+journals, diaries, probate records, tax lists, pension claims, and court
+records offer adequate data to the inquiring historian, although the
+extra-legal character of the settlement seriously reduced the public
+record. Nevertheless, the broad scope of ethnography provides the kind
+of study for which the data supply a rather full picture of life on this
+frontier. Political, economic, and social patterns are discernible,
+although no day-by-day account for any extended period has been
+uncovered.
+
+This ethnographic analysis demonstrates the merits of the "civilization
+approach" to history. Examining every aspect of a society, it provides
+more than a mere "battles and leaders" account. The result gives insight
+into a "style of life" rather than a chronology of highlights. This
+study has investigated the full institutional structure of the Fair Play
+frontier, evaluating that structure in terms of a developing democracy,
+or, at least, of democratic tendencies.
+
+American civilization was a frontier civilization from the outset, and
+that frontier experience was significant in the development of American
+democracy. Frederick Jackson Turner's frontier thesis, which has
+probably inspired more historical scholarship than any other American
+thesis, stated that "the existence of an area of free land, its
+continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward,
+explain American development."[5] That development took place on
+successive frontiers stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific Coast
+over a period of almost three centuries. Turner's second frontier, the
+Allegheny Mountains, marked the farmers' frontier of the Fair Play
+settlers of the West Branch Valley.
+
+It was on the frontier, according to Turner, that the "true" traits of
+American character emerged; its composite nationality, its self-reliant
+spirit, its independence of thought and action, its nationalism, and its
+rationalistic approach to the problems of a pioneer existence. The Fair
+Play settlers, American frontiersmen, suggested some of these traits in
+their character. Recognizing the data limitations of this study, the
+evidence indicates some validation of this test of Turner's model.
+However, it would be presumptuous indeed to conclude that this analysis
+offers a complete demonstration of the impact of the frontier in the
+development of traits of character which Turner classified as American.
+
+The composite nationality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly
+evident from the demographic analysis offered at the beginning of this
+study.[6] Seven different national stock groups appeared on this
+frontier: Scotch-Irish, English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and
+French. Here, indeed, was "the crucible of the frontier," in which
+settlers were "Americanized, liberated, and fused into a mixed race."[7]
+
+The legendary self-reliance of the frontiersman is not without some
+basis in fact. The nature of the frontier experience itself was
+conducive to its development. Its appearance among the Fair Play
+settlers is implied in various contexts. Politically, it is suggested in
+the creation of the Fair Play men, the annual governing tribunal, an
+extra-legal political agency in this extra-Provincial territory.
+Economically, it is intimated in the image of the frontier farmer
+tackling the wilderness with rifle and plow and the unbounded
+determination to make a better life for himself and his family.
+Socially, the self-reliance of these doughty pioneers is indicated in
+the continuation of their religious practices and worship, despite the
+absence of any organized church. Their self reliance is indicated, as
+well, in the flexibility of a social structure whose main criterion was
+achievement, a society in which "what" you were was more important than
+"who" you were. These examples are, of course, only brief glimpses of
+the elusive trait of self-reliance which Turner considered typical of
+the frontier.
+
+Independence, or the ability to act independently, was a characteristic
+frontier trait, according to Turner. The Fair Play settlers presented
+some contradictions. It is true that they organized their own system of
+government and the code under which it operated. However, their key
+leaders lived on the periphery; and the settlers petitioned the
+Commonwealth government for assistance in the vital questions of defense
+and pre-emption rights.[8] The Fair Play settlers were generally
+independent, a condition promoted by the necessities of frontier life;
+but, obviously, they were not isolated.
+
+It is difficult to assess the nationalizing influence of this particular
+frontier. In the first place, aside from the Second Continental
+Congress, there was no national government during most of the Fair Play
+period. The Articles of Confederation were not ratified until 1781, and
+Fair Play territory was opened to settlement after the Treaty of Fort
+Stanwix in 1784. Furthermore, the patriotism of the Fair Play settlers
+seems to reflect an ethnocentric pride in their own territory and an
+exaggerated interpretation of its significance to the developing
+nation.[9] Their patriotism was apparently for an ideal, liberty, to
+which they were devoted, having already enjoyed it in a nation only
+recently declared, but yet to be recognized. And, for its support, there
+had been a rush to the colors by these settlers "beyond the purchase
+line."[10] The "real American Revolution," as John Adams described it,
+was "in the minds and hearts of the people," and it was "effected before
+the war Commenced."[11] That revolution had already occurred in the
+Fair Play territory prior to the firing of "the shot heard round the
+world" on Lexington green.
+
+The frontier experience had a profound influence on the development of
+the American philosophy of pragmatism. Turner claimed that it was "to
+the frontier" that "the American intellect owe[d] its striking
+characteristics."[12] And the Fair Play settlers showed that
+
+    ... coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and
+    inquisitiveness; that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick to
+    find expedients; that masterful grasp of material things, lacking in
+    the artistic but powerful to effect great ends; that restless,
+    nervous energy; that dominant individualism, working for good and
+    for evil, and withal that buoyancy and exuberance which comes with
+    freedom....[13]
+
+The frontiersman of the West Branch was a free spirit in a free land, a
+doer rather than a thinker, more concerned with the "hows" than the
+"whys" of survival. This practical approach to problems can be seen in
+the homes he built, the tools he made, the clothes he wore, the
+political and social systems under which he operated, and the set of
+values by which he was motivated. The development of these
+characteristic American traits owed much to the frontier and the new
+experiences which it offered.
+
+This ethnographic analysis of the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch
+Valley has attempted to present a clearer picture of the "style of life"
+on this particular frontier and, in so doing, to suggest a further
+technique for the frontier historian. There are, no doubt, certain
+defects in this specific study, but the fault lies with the limitations
+of the data rather than the technique. The scope of this investigation
+has carried into questions of geography, demography, politics,
+economics, social systems, and leadership. Unfortunately, the frontier
+had not yet provided the leisure essential to artistic and aesthetic
+pursuits. Consequently, these areas were given a limited treatment.
+Furthermore, the mythology and folklore of this valley offered little of
+record. However, the breadth of this analysis has furnished evidence of
+the existence of democracy on this frontier and, thus, support for
+Turner's thesis, or at least for this interpretation of it.
+
+The geographic analysis has clarified the question of the Tiadaghton,
+demonstrating that Lycoming Creek, rather than Pine Creek, was the true
+eastern boundary of the Fair Play territory. The substantial destruction
+of an erroneous legend has been the main contribution of the geographic
+part of this study.[14] It is now clear that the Fair Play territory
+extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna River, to the Great Island, just east of Lock Haven.
+This frontier region was beyond the legal limit of settlement of the
+Province and the Commonwealth from 1769 to 1784. Hence, within its
+limits was formed the extra-legal political system known as Fair Play.
+
+The demographic portion of this study has added to the undermining of
+the frontier myth of the Scotch-Irish. The evidence presented here
+indicates that it was the frontier, rather than national origin, which
+affected the behavior of the pioneers of the West Branch Valley. The
+Fair Play settlers, a mixed population of seven national stock groups,
+reacted similarly to the common problems of the frontier experience. In
+one important exception, the Fair Play system itself, there is, however,
+an apparent contradiction. Since no account of any "fair play system"
+has turned up in the annals of the Cumberland Valley, the American
+reservoir of the Scotch-Irish, it seems quite probable that the "system"
+originated in either Northern Ireland or Scotland, or else on the
+frontier itself. This probability offers good ground for further study,
+particularly when the existence of a similar "system" in Greene County,
+which was found in conjunction with this investigation, is
+considered.[15] If the Fair Play system originated on the frontier, why
+did not it also appear on the Virginia and Carolina frontiers where the
+Scotch-Irish predominated? Regardless, the lack of data corroborating
+the American origin of the Fair Play system leads to the conclusion that
+the germ of this political organization was brought to this country by
+the Scotch-Irish from their cultural heritage, and that those elements
+were found usable under the frontier conditions of both central and
+southwestern Pennsylvania. If so, the politics of "fair play" will add
+to, rather than detract from, the myth of the Scotch-Irish.
+
+This study has also brought forward the first complete account of court
+records validating the activities of the Fair Play men. Mainly concerned
+with the adjudication of land questions, this frontier tribunal
+developed an unwritten code which encompassed the problems of
+settlement, tenure, and ejectment. Subsequently reviewed in the regular
+courts of the counties of which the Fair Play territory became a part,
+these cases provide substantial evidence of the existence of a "system"
+as well as insight into the manner of its operation. The fairness of the
+Fair Play system is marked by the fact that none of the decisions of its
+tribunal was later reversed in the established county courts.
+Supplemented by the Committee of Safety for Northumberland County and
+augmented by peripheral leaders, who gave them a voice in the higher
+councils of the State, the Fair Play men and their government proved
+adequate to the needs of the settlers, until all were driven off in the
+Great Runaway of 1778.
+
+Some corroboration for the legendary tale of a "Fair Play Declaration of
+Independence" was found in the course of this study. Although
+consisting, in the main, of accounts culled from the records of
+Revolutionary War pension claimants made some eighty years after the
+event, the evidence is that of a contemporary.[16] However, the most
+common objection to this conclusion, that the Fair Play declaration was
+merely the reading of a copy of Jefferson's Declaration, is
+unsubstantiated by the archival descriptions.[17] Perhaps the Fair Play
+declaration is apocryphal, but, lacking valid disclaimers, the Hamilton
+data offer some basis for a judgment. It is the tentative conclusion of
+this writer that there was such a declaration on the banks of Pine Creek
+in July of 1776.
+
+The Fair Play territory was truly "an area of free land" in which a "new
+order of Americanism" emerged.[18] Individualistic and self-reliant of
+necessity, the pioneers of this farmers' frontier rationally developed
+their solution to the problem of survival in the wilderness, a
+democratic squatter sovereignty. With land readily available and a free
+labor system to work it, provided that the family was large enough to
+assure sufficient "hands," these agrarian frontiersmen not only
+cultivated the soil but also a free society. And their cooperative
+spirit, despite their mixed national origins, was markedly noticeable at
+harvesttime. From such spirit are communities formed, and from such
+communities a democratic society emerges.
+
+This analysis has not only described the geography and demography, the
+politics and economics of the Fair Play settlers; it has also examined
+the basis and structure of this society, including the value system
+which undergirded it. The results have pictured the religious liberty
+extant in a frontier society isolated from any regular or established
+church, a liberty of conscience which left each man free to worship
+according to the dictates of his own faith. This freedom, this right to
+choose for himself, made the Fair Play settler surprisingly receptive to
+other groups and their practices, practices which he was free to reject,
+and often did.[19] This analysis has also pointed up the class structure
+and its significance in promoting order in a frontier community. And
+finally, an examination of the value system of these Pennsylvania
+pioneers has provided an understanding of why they behaved as they did.
+
+The last major aspect of this investigation concerned the nature of
+leadership. Determined by the people, and thus essentially democratic,
+it had certain peculiar characteristics. In the first place, the top
+leaders tended to come from the Fair Play community in its broadest
+social sense, but not from the Fair Play territory in its narrow
+geographic sense.[20] Secondly, the political participation of the Fair
+Play settlers, if office-holding is any criterion, emphasizes the high
+degree of involvement in terms of the total population.[21] And last,
+this leadership appeared to be overextended when faced with the problem
+of defending its own frontier and the new nation which was striving so
+desperately for independence. Consequently, it was forced to turn to
+established government for support. This may have been the embryonic
+beginning of the nationalism which the frontier fostered in later
+generations.
+
+What then, is the meaning of this particular study, an ethnographic
+interpretation of Turner's thesis? Turner himself, gave the best
+argument for ethnography. He said that
+
+    ... the economist, the political scientist, the psychologist, the
+    sociologist, the geographer, the student of literature, of art, of
+    religion--all the allied laborers in the study of society--have
+    contributions to make to the equipment of the historian. These
+    contributions are partly of material, partly of tools, partly of new
+    points of view, new hypotheses, new suggestions of relations,
+    causes, and emphasis. Each of these special students is in some
+    danger of bias by his particular point of view, by his exposure to
+    see simply the thing in which he is primarily interested, and also
+    by his effort to deduce the universal laws of his separate science.
+    The historian, on the other hand, is exposed to the danger of
+    dealing with the complex and interacting social forces of a period
+    or of a country from some single point of view to which his special
+    training or interest inclines him. If the truth is to be made known,
+    the historian must so far familiarize himself with the work, and
+    equip himself with the training of his sister-subjects that he can
+    at least avail himself of their results and in some reasonable
+    degree master the essential tools of their trade.[22]
+
+Frontier ethnography is just such an effort.
+
+The frontier ethnographer then, because of his interdisciplinary
+approach, can capture the spirit of pioneer life. And if, as Turner
+suggested, the frontier explains American development, then frontier
+ethnography presents an understanding of the American ethos with its
+ideals of discovery, democracy, and individualism.[23] These ideals
+characterize "the American spirit and the meaning of America in world
+history."[24]
+
+The ideal of discovery, "the courageous determination to break new
+paths," as Turner called it, was abundantly evident in the Fair Play
+territory of the West Branch Valley.[25] This innovating spirit can be
+seen in the piercing of the Provincial boundary, despite the restrictive
+legislation to the contrary, and the establishment of homes in Indian
+territory.[26] It was also demonstrated in a marvelous adaptability in
+solving the new problems of the frontier, problems for which the old
+dogmas were no longer applicable. The new world of the Susquehanna
+frontier made new men, Americans.
+
+Self-determination, the ideal of democracy as we have defined it, was
+the cornerstone of Fair Play society. Its particular contribution was
+the Fair Play "system" with its popularly elected tribunal of Fair Play
+men. Perhaps this was the proper antecedent of the commission form of
+local government which came into vogue on the progressive wave of the
+late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Regardless, the
+geographic limitations of the Fair Play territory, the frequency of
+elections, and the open conduct of meetings tend to substantiate the
+democratic evaluation which has been made of the politics of this
+frontier community. Furthermore, as was pointed out in the last chapter,
+this self-determination was the key characteristic of the economic and
+social life of these people.[27]
+
+The pioneer ideal of creative and competitive individualism, which
+Turner considered America's best contribution to history and to
+progress, was an essential of the frontier experience which became an
+integral part of the American mythology.[28] The "myth of the happy
+yeoman," as one historian called it, is still revered in American
+folklore and respected in American politics, whether it is outmoded or
+not.[29] The primitive nature of frontier life developed this
+characteristically American trait and the family, the basic
+organization of social control, promoted it. It was this promotion, with
+its antipathy to any outside control, which stimulated the Revolution,
+creating an American nation from an already existing American character.
+
+The individualism of the West Branch frontier is also apparent in the
+administration of justice. The Fair Play system emphasized the
+personality of law, by its very title, rather than the organized
+machinery of justice.[30] Frontier law was personal and direct,
+resulting in the unchecked development of the individual, a circumstance
+which Turner considered the significant product of this frontier
+democracy.[31] Being personal, though, it had meaning for those affected
+by it, as an anecdote noted earlier indicated.[32]
+
+Individualism has become somewhat of an anachronism in a mass society,
+but its obsolescence today is part of the current American tragedy. The
+buoyant self-confidence which it inspired has made much of the American
+dream a reality. Legislation, it is true, has taken the place of free
+lands as the means of preserving democracy, but it will be a hollow
+triumph if that legislation suppresses this essential trait of the
+American character, its individualism. No intelligent person today would
+recommend a return to the laissez-faire individualism of the Social
+Darwinists of the late nineteenth century, but it must be admitted that
+a society emphasizing the worth of the individual and dedicated to
+principles of justice and fair play, the banner under which the
+frontiersmen of the West Branch operated, has genuine merit.
+
+Whether the historian is analyzing old frontiers or charting new ones,
+the timeless question remains: does man have the intelligence adequate
+to secure his own survival? The old frontiers, such as the Fair Play
+territory of the West Branch of the Susquehanna, were free lands of
+opportunity for a better life, and the history of the westward movement
+of the American people gives ample proof of their conquest. But the new
+frontiers are not so clearly marked or so easily conquered. Perhaps a
+re-examination of the history of the old frontiers can give increased
+meaning to the problems of the new. This investigation was attempted, in
+part, to serve such a purpose.
+
+The intelligent solution to the problem of survival for the pioneers of
+the West Branch Valley was fair play. The ethnography of the Fair Play
+settlers is the record of the democratic development of an American
+community under the impact of the new experience of the frontier.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] P. 2.
+
+[2] _The Oxford Universal Dictionary_ (Oxford, 1955), p. 637.
+
+[3] Solon and Elizabeth Buck, _The Planting of Civilization in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431 and 451.
+
+[4] _See_, for example, Dunaway, _A History of Pennsylvania_, p. 146,
+and _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 159-160; _also_,
+Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 306.
+
+[5] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 1.
+
+[6] _See_ Chapter Two.
+
+[7] Quoted by Ray Allen Billington in his introduction to Turner,
+_Frontier and Section_, p. 5.
+
+[8] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217-218, 518-522.
+
+[9] This pride was notably demonstrated in the insistence of the Fair
+Play settlers that a stand be made at Fort Augusta following the Great
+Runaway. Previous to this, they had pleaded for support for "our Common
+Cause" in the defense of this frontier. _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second
+Series, III, 217.
+
+[10] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, X, 27-31, 417, and Fifth
+Series, II, 29-35.
+
+[11] Quoted in Clinton Rossiter, _The First American Revolution_ (New
+York, 1956), pp. 4-5.
+
+[12] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 37.
+
+[13] _Ibid._
+
+[14] _See also_, George D. Wolf, "The Tiadaghton Question," _The Lock
+Haven Review_, Series I, No. 5 (1963), 61-71.
+
+[15] Buck, _The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania_, pp.
+431, 451.
+
+[16] Anna Jackson Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of
+Pensions, Dec. 16, 1858, Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical Society.
+
+[17] _Colonial Records_, X, 634-635. The following resolution of
+Congress was entered in the minutes of the Council of Safety on July 5,
+1776:
+
+    _Resolved_, That Copies of the Declaration be sent to the several
+    Assemblies, Conventions, and Councils of Safety, and to the several
+    Commanding Officers of the Continental Troops, that it be proclaimed
+    in each of the United States, and at the Head of the Army.
+
+                                    By order of Congress.
+                                        sign'd, JOHN HANCOCK, Presid't.
+
+Provision was also made for the reading in Philadelphia at 12 noon on
+July 8, and letters were sent to Bucks, Chester, Northampton, Lancaster,
+and Berks counties with copies of the Declaration to be posted on Monday
+the 8th where elections for delegates were to be held. For some reason,
+the frontier counties of Bedford, Cumberland, Westmoreland, York, and
+Northumberland, contiguous to the Fair Play territory, were omitted from
+these instructions.
+
+[18] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 1, 18.
+
+[19] _The Journal of William Colbert_ gives frequent testimony to this
+statement, as indicated in Chapter Five.
+
+[20] _See_ the map in Chapter One for the geographic boundaries of the
+Fair Play territory. Note the location of the top leaders, Henry and
+Frederick Antes and Robert Fleming, in Chapter Six.
+
+[21] The number of different office-holders runs to better than ten per
+cent of the population.
+
+[22] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 333-334.
+
+[23] _Ibid._, pp. 306-307.
+
+[24] _Ibid._, p. 306.
+
+[25] _Ibid._
+
+[26] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), pp. 163-164.
+
+[27] _See_ Chapter Seven for an evaluation of "Democracy on the
+Pennsylvania Frontier."
+
+[28] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 307.
+
+[29] Richard Hofstadter, "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," _American
+Heritage_, VII, No. 3 (April, 1956), 43-53.
+
+[30] The term "the personality of the law" is Turner's and emphasizes
+the men who carried out the law, rather than its structure. The fact
+that the ruling tribunal of the West Branch Valley was referred to as
+the "Fair Play men" rather than the "tribunal" illustrates this
+contention.
+
+[31] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 253-254.
+
+[32] _See_ Chapter Three, n. 24.
+
+
+
+
+_Bibliography_
+
+
+BOOKS
+
+Albion, Robert G. and Leonidas Dodson (eds.). _Philip Vickers Fithian:
+Journal, 1775-1776._ Princeton, 1934.
+
+American Council of Learned Societies. "Report of the Committee on
+Linguistic and National Stocks in the Population of the United States,"
+_Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year
+1931_, I. Washington, 1932.
+
+Andrews, Charles M. _Colonial Folkways._ New Haven, 1919.
+
+----. _Guide to the Materials for American History to 1783 in the Public
+Record Office of Great Britain._ Washington, 1912.
+
+---- and Frances G. Davenport. _Guide to the Manuscript Materials for
+the History of the United States to 1783, in the British Museum, in
+Minor London Archives, and in the Libraries of Oxford and Cambridge._
+Washington, 1908.
+
+Barck, Oscar T., Jr., and Hugh T. Lefler. _Colonial America._ New York,
+1958.
+
+Bates, Samuel P. _Greene County._ Chicago, 1888.
+
+Becker, Carl L. _Beginnings of the American People._ Ithaca, N. Y.,
+1960.
+
+Bell, Herbert. _History of Northumberland County, Pennsylvania._
+Chicago, 1891.
+
+Billington, Ray Allen. _Westward Expansion._ New York, 1960.
+
+Boyd, Julian P., and Robert J. Taylor (eds.). _The Susquehanna Company
+Papers_, 1750-1775. 6 vols. Ithaca, N. Y., 1962.
+
+Bridenbaugh, Carl and Jessica. _Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in
+the Age of Franklin._ New York, 1962.
+
+Buck, Solon J. and Elizabeth H. _The Planting of Civilization in Western
+Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1939.
+
+Calhoun, Arthur W. _A Social History of the American Family_, I. New
+York, 1960.
+
+Cocks, Robert S. _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The History
+of Northumberland Presbytery, 1811-1961._ 1961.
+
+Commager, Henry S. _Documents of American History_, I. New York, 1958.
+
+Crick, B. R. and Miriam Alman (eds.). _A Guide to Manuscripts Relating
+to America in Great Britain and Ireland._ New York, 1961.
+
+Curti, Merle, _et al._ _The Making of an American Community, A Case
+Study of Democracy in a Frontier County._ Stanford, 1959.
+
+Day, Richard E. (comp.). _Calendar of the Sir William Johnson
+Manuscripts in the New York State Library._ Albany, N. Y., 1909.
+
+DePuy, Henry F. _A Bibliography of the English Colonial Treaties with
+the American Indians including a Synopsis of Each Treaty._ New York,
+1917.
+
+DeSchweinitz, Edmund A. _The Life and Times of David Zeisberger._
+Philadelphia, 1870.
+
+Doddridge, Joseph. _Notes on the Settlement and Indian Wars of the
+Western Parts of Virginia and Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1912.
+
+Dunaway, Wayland F. _A History of Pennsylvania._ Englewood Cliffs, N.
+J., 1948.
+
+----. _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania._ Chapel Hill, 1944.
+
+Egle, William H. _History of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania._
+Philadelphia, 1883.
+
+---- (ed.). _Historical Register: Notes and Queries, Historical and
+Genealogical, relating to Interior Pennsylvania_, 2 vols. Harrisburg,
+1883-84.
+
+----. _Pennsylvania Genealogies; Scotch-Irish and German._ Harrisburg,
+1886, 1896.
+
+Frost, Robert. _Complete Poems of Robert Frost._ New York, 1949.
+
+Hall, Carrie A., and Rose G. Kretsinger. _The Romance of the Patchwork
+Quilt in America._ New York, 1935.
+
+Hanna, C. A. _The Scotch-Irish._ 2 vols. New York, 1902.
+
+Jones, U. J. _History of the Early Settlements of the Juniata Valley._
+Philadelphia, 1856.
+
+Klett, Guy S. _Presbyterians in Colonial Pennsylvania._ Philadelphia,
+1937.
+
+Leopold, Richard W., and Arthur S. Link (eds.). _Problems in American
+History._ Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957.
+
+Leyburn, James G. _The Scotch-Irish: A Social History._ Chapel Hill,
+1962.
+
+Lincoln, Charles A. (comp.). _Calendar of Sr. William Johnson
+Manuscripts in the Library of the American Antiquarian Society._
+("Transactions of the Society," Vol. XI.) Worcester, 1906.
+
+Linn, John B. _History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania._
+Philadelphia, 1883.
+
+----. _Annals of Buffalo Valley._ Harrisburg, 1877.
+
+MacMinn, Edwin. _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes._ Camden, N. J.,
+1900.
+
+Maginnis, T. H., Jr. _The Irish Contribution to American Independence._
+Philadelphia, 1913.
+
+Martin, A. E., and H. H. Shenk. _Pennsylvania History Told by
+Contemporaries._ New York, 1925.
+
+Martindale, Don. _American Society._ New York, 1960.
+
+Maynard, D. S. _Historical View of Clinton County, from its Earliest
+Settlement to the Present Time._ Lock Haven, 1875.
+
+Meginness, John F. _Biographical Annals of the West Branch Valley._
+Williamsport, 1889.
+
+----. _History of Lycoming County, Pennsylvania._ Chicago, 1872.
+
+----. _Otzinachson: or a History of the West Branch Valley of the
+Susquehanna._ Philadelphia, 1857.
+
+----. _Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley of the
+Susquehanna._ Williamsport, 1889.
+
+National Education Association. _The Education of Free Men in American
+Democracy._ Washington, 1941.
+
+O'Callaghan, E. B. _Documentary History of the State of New York_, I.
+Albany, N. Y., 1849.
+
+_The Oxford Universal Dictionary._ Oxford, 1955.
+
+Parkes, Henry Bamford. _The American Experience._ New York, 1959.
+
+The Pennsylvania Writers' Project, Work Projects Administration. _A
+Picture of Clinton County._ Williamsport, 1942.
+
+----. _A Picture of Lycoming County._ Williamsport, 1939.
+
+Proud, Robert. _History of Pennsylvania in North America._ 2 vols.
+Philadelphia, 1797, 1798.
+
+Ranney, Austin, and Willmoore Kendall. _Democracy and the American Party
+System._ New York, 1956.
+
+Rossiter, Clinton. _The First American Revolution._ New York, 1956.
+
+Rothermund, Dietmar. _The Layman's Progress._ Philadelphia, 1961.
+
+Rupp, Israel D. (ed.). _A Collection of Thirty Thousand Names of German,
+Swiss, Dutch, French, Portuguese, and other Immigrants in Pennsylvania,
+Chronologically Arranged from 1727 to 1776._ Harrisburg, 1856.
+
+Sanderson, W. H. _Historical Reminiscences_, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker.
+Altoona, 1920.
+
+Sergeant, Thomas. _View of the Land Laws of Pennsylvania with Notices of
+its Early History and Legislation._ Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, 1838.
+
+Shimmell, Lewis S. _Border Warfare in Pennsylvania During the
+Revolution._ Harrisburg, 1901.
+
+Singmaster, Elsie. _Pennsylvania's Susquehanna._ Harrisburg, 1950.
+
+Smith, Charles. _Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_, II.
+Philadelphia, 1810.
+
+Stevens, Benjamin F. _Catalogue Index of Manuscripts in the Archives of
+England, France, Holland, and Spain relating to America, 1763-1783._
+London, 1870-1902. (In manuscript in the Library of Congress.)
+
+Stevens, Joseph. _History of the Presbytery of Northumberland._
+Williamsport, 1881.
+
+Sullivan, James (ed.). _The Papers of Sir William Johnson_, I-III.
+Albany, 1921.
+
+Taylor, George R. _The Turner Thesis Concerning the Role of the Frontier
+in American History_ ("Problems in American Civilization."). Boston,
+1956.
+
+Theiss, Lewis E. "Early Agriculture," _Susquehanna Tales_ (Sunbury,
+1955), 88-89.
+
+Tome, Philip. _Pioneer Life; or Thirty Years a Hunter._ Harrisburg,
+1928.
+
+Trinterud, Leonard J. _The Forming of an American Tradition: A
+Re-Examination of Colonial Presbyterianism._ Philadelphia, 1949.
+
+Turner, Frederick Jackson. _Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of
+Frederick Jackson Turner._ Intro. by Ray Allen Billington. Englewood,
+Cliffs, N. J., 1961.
+
+----. _The Frontier in American History._ New York, 1963.
+
+Volwiler, Albert T. _George Croghan and the Westward Movement
+1741-1783._ Cleveland, 1926.
+
+Wallace, Paul A. W. _Conrad Weiser._ Philadelphia, 1945.
+
+----. _Indians in Pennsylvania._ Harrisburg, 1961.
+
+----. _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation._ New York, 1962.
+
+Webb, Walter Prescott. _The Great Plains._ New York, 1931.
+
+Wertenbaker, Thomas J. _The First Americans 1607-1690._ New York, 1962.
+
+----. _The Founding of American Civilization: The Middle Colonies._ New
+York, 1949.
+
+Wittke, Carl. _We Who Built America._ 1963.
+
+Wright, J. E., and Doris S. Corbett. _Pioneer Life In Western
+Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1940.
+
+Wright, Louis B. _Culture on the Moving Frontier._ Bloomington, Ind.,
+1955.
+
+----. _The Atlantic Frontier._ New York, 1947.
+
+----. _The Cultural Life of the American Colonies, 1607-1763._ New York,
+1957.
+
+Yeates, Jasper. _Pennsylvania Reports_, I. Philadelphia and St. Louis,
+1871.
+
+
+PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
+
+_Appearance Docket Commencing 1797_, No. 2. Lycoming County, Office of
+the Prothonotor, Williamsport.
+
+_Colonial Records_, IX. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, X. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XI. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XII. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XX. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, [First Series], XI. Philadelphia, 1855.
+
+----, [First Series], XII. Philadelphia, 1856.
+
+----, Second Series, II. Harrisburg, 1876.
+
+----, Second Series, III. Harrisburg, 1875.
+
+----, Second Series, XVII. Harrisburg, 1890.
+
+----, Third Series, XI-XXII. Harrisburg, 1897.
+
+_New Purchase Applications, Nos. 1823 and 2611_, April 3, 1769. Bureau
+of Land Records, Harrisburg.
+
+_Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts of
+Pennsylvania._ Harrisburg, 1916.
+
+
+ARTICLES AND ESSAYS
+
+Baelyn, Bernard. "Political Experiences and Enlightenment Ideas in
+Eighteenth-Century America," _American Historical Review_, LXVII
+(January, 1962), 339-351.
+
+Beck, Herbert H. "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania
+Rifle," _Papers Read Before the Lancaster County Historical Society_,
+LIII (1949), 33-61.
+
+Berger, Robert. "The Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County,"
+_Now and Then_, XII (July, 1960), 274-280.
+
+Bertin, Eugene P. "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and Then_,
+VIII (October, 1947), 258-259.
+
+Carter, John H. "The Committee of Safety of Northumberland County," _The
+Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_,
+XVIII (1950), 33-54.
+
+Champagne, Roger. "Family Politics Versus Constitutional Principles: The
+New York Assembly Elections of 1768 and 1769," _William and Mary
+Quarterly_, Third Series, XX (January, 1963), 57-79.
+
+Clark, Chester. "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," _Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_, VII (1935), 16-44.
+
+Deans, John Bacon. "The Migration of the Connecticut Yankees to the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna River," _Proceedings of the Northumberland
+County Historical Society_ (1954), 34-55.
+
+"Diary of the Unknown Traveler," _Now and Then_, X (January, 1954),
+307-313.
+
+"Eleanor Coldren's Depositions," _Now and Then_, XII (October, 1959),
+220-222.
+
+Everett, F. B. "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River," _Journal Presbyterian Historical Society_, XII
+(October, 1927), 481-485.
+
+Garrison, Hazel Shields. "Cartography of Pennsylvania Before 1800,"
+_Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, LIX (July, 1935),
+255-283.
+
+Gross, Rebecca F. "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven _Express_ (August
+3, 1963), 4.
+
+Hofstadter, Richard. "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," _American
+Heritage_, VII (April, 1956), 43-53.
+
+Johns, John O. "July 4, 1776--Rediscovered." _Commonwealth: The Magazine
+for Pennsylvania_, II (July, 1948), 2-16.
+
+Jordan, John W. (contributor), "Spangenberg's Notes of Travel to
+Onondaga in 1745," _Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, II
+(No. 4, 1878), 424-432.
+
+Klett, Guy S. "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along The
+Susquehanna River," _Pennsylvania History_, XX (April, 1953), 165-179.
+
+Linn, John Blair. "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers, 1773-1785,"
+_The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, VII (No. 4, 1883),
+420-425.
+
+"Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor, 1792, Found Among the
+Bingham Papers," _Now & Then_, X. (July, 1952), 148-150.
+
+Meginness, John F. "The Scotch-Irish of the Upper Susquehanna Valley,"
+_Scotch-Irish Society of America Proceedings and Addresses_, VIII
+(1897), 159-169.
+
+Neal, Don. "Freedom Outpost," _Pennsylvania Game News_, XXXI (July,
+1960), 6-10.
+
+Russell, Helen Herritt. "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and
+Their Government," _Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical
+Society_, XXII (1958), 16-43.
+
+----. "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Journal of the Lycoming
+Historical Society_, II (No. 4, 1961), 3-10.
+
+----. "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Northumberland County Historical
+Society Proceedings and Addresses_, XXIII (1960), 1-16.
+
+----. "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence,"
+_Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical Society_, XXII
+(1958), 1-15.
+
+Silver, James W. (ed.). "An Autobiographical Sketch of Chauncey
+Brockway," _Pennsylvania History_, XXV (April, 1958), 137-161.
+
+Stille, C. J. "Pennsylvania and the Declaration of Independence,"
+_Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, XIII (No. 4, 1889),
+385-429.
+
+Wallace, Paul A. W., Excerpt from letter, Sept. 2, 1952, _Now and Then_,
+X (October, 1952), 184.
+
+Wilkinson, Norman B. (ed.). "Mr. Davy's Diary," _Now and Then_, X
+(April, 1954), 336-343.
+
+Williams, E. Melvin. "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," _Americana_
+XVII (1923), 374-387.
+
+Williams, Richmond D. "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778," _Now
+and Then_, XII (April, 1960), 258-259.
+
+Wolf, George D. "The Tiadaghton Question," _The Lock Haven Review_,
+Series I, No. 5 (1963), 61-71.
+
+Wood, T. Kenneth (ed.). "Journal of an English Emigrant Farmer,"
+_Lycoming Historical Society Proceedings and Papers_, No. 6 (1928).
+
+----. _Now and Then_, X (July, 1952), 148-150.
+
+---- (ed.). "Observations Made By John Bartram In His Travels From
+Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the Lake Ontario in 1743," _Now and
+Then_, V (1936), 90.
+
+
+UNPUBLISHED STUDIES
+
+Turner, Morris K. "The Commercial Relations of the Susquehanna Valley
+During the Colonial Period." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University
+of Pennsylvania, 1916.
+
+
+_MANUSCRIPTS_
+
+MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS
+
+Zebulon Butler Papers, Wyoming Historical and Geological Society,
+Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
+
+Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary, 1716-1791 (microfilm, 2 reels). The
+Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.
+
+Journal of William Colbert (typescript). Property of the Rev. Charles F.
+Berkheimer of Williamsport, Pa. Original (1792-1794) at the Garrett
+Biblical Seminary, Chicago. (Copy also at Lycoming College,
+Williamsport.)
+
+Revolutionary War Pension Claims (typescript). Wagner Collection, Muncy
+Historical Society and Museum of History, Muncy, Pa.
+
+
+PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE
+
+Mrs. Solon J. Buck, Washington, D. C, June 22, 1963, to the author.
+
+Alfred P. James, Pittsburgh, July 16, 1963, to the author.
+
+Peter Marshall, Berkeley, Calif., May 19, 1962, to the author.
+
+Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, Collegeville, Pa., October 21, 1962, to the
+author.
+
+Paul A. W. Wallace, Harrisburg, February 16, 1961, July 30, August 24,
+and December 17, 1962, to the author.
+
+
+
+
+_Index_
+
+
+ Adlum, John, 9, 10, 13
+
+ Alexander, James, 26
+
+ Allegheny Mountains, 1, 2, 47, 102
+
+ Allison, Rev. Francis, 67
+
+ American Revolution, 23, 33, 34, 44, 49, 54, 68, 71, 84, 86, 103, 104, 110
+
+ Antes, Frederick, 77-82, 87
+
+ Antes, Henry, Jr., 40, 42, 76-83, 101
+
+ Antes, Henry, Sr., 78
+
+ Antes, Joseph, 42
+
+ Antes, Philip, 42
+
+ Antes, William, 78
+
+ Antes Mill, 79, 80, 82
+
+ Art, 70
+
+ Arthur, Robert, 41
+
+ Atlee, Samuel J., 5
+
+
+ Bald Eagle Creek, 22, 48, 67, 79
+
+ Bald Eagle Mountains, 14
+
+ Bald Eagle Township, 45, 46, 84
+
+ Bald Eagle's Nest, 48
+
+ Baptists, 68
+
+ Barn-raisings, 60, 95, 97
+
+ Bartram, John, 9-11, 13
+
+ Bertin, Eugene P., 7
+
+ "Beulah Land," 71
+
+ Bingham, William, 11
+
+ Blackwell, 71
+
+ Bonner, Barnabas, 40
+
+ Books, 69, 70
+
+ Brainerd, Rev. David, 67
+
+ Bryce, James, 89, 90
+
+ Bucks County, 19
+
+ Burnet's Hills, 6
+
+
+ "Cabin right," 37
+
+ Cabin-raisings, 48, 51, 60, 74, 95, 97
+
+ Caldwell, Bratton, 40, 41
+
+ Calhoune, George, 26
+
+ Cammal, 71
+
+ Campbell, Cleary, 26, 62
+
+ Campbell, William, Jr., 26
+
+ Carlisle Presbytery, 67
+
+ Charter of Privileges, 96
+
+ Chester County, 19, 20
+
+ Children, 55
+
+ Clark, Francis, 42
+
+ Clark, John, 26
+
+ Colbert, William, 61-63, 65, 70
+
+ Coldren, Eleanor, 40, 83, 92, 96
+
+ Commerce, 56
+
+ Committee of Safety, 34, 44, 45, 48, 54, 77, 81-83, 88, 106
+
+ Connecticut, 20, 21, 23, 31
+
+ Constitutional Convention, Pennsylvania (1776), 80, 83, 87
+
+ Continental Congress, 85, 103
+
+ Cooke, William, 26
+
+ "Corn right," 37
+
+ Council of Safety, 34, 44
+
+ Covenhoven, Robert, 22
+
+ Crawford, James, 77, 82, 83
+
+ Cruger, Daniel, 96
+
+ Culbertson, Mr., 67
+
+ Cumberland County, 19, 20
+
+ Cumberland Valley, 47, 105
+
+ Curti, Merle, 76, 100
+
+
+ Dauphin County, 19, 20
+
+ Davy, Mr., 56, 63
+
+ Declaration of Independence, 42, 43, 71, 74, 106
+
+ "Declaration of Independence" of Fair Play Settlers, 42-44, 61, 62, 71,
+       74, 83, 106, 107
+
+ Defense, 84, 103, 108
+
+ Demography, 16-29, 100, 104-107
+
+ DeSchweinitz, Edmund A., 8, 10
+
+ Dewitt, Abraham, 40
+
+ Dewitt, Peter, 95, 96
+
+ Dickinson, John, 43, 78, 81
+
+ Donegal Presbytery, 67
+
+ Dougherty, Samuel, 40
+
+ Drinking, 71, 72, 74, 75, 98
+
+ Duncan, Mr., 38
+
+ Dunn, William, 96
+
+
+ Economic institutions, 89-91, 97, 99-102, 104, 107, 109;
+   _see also_ Farming
+
+ Education, 17, 58, 65, 69
+
+ Ejectment, 35-39, 41, 106
+
+ English, 16-20, 24-26, 28, 54, 57, 58, 83, 84, 93, 95, 102
+
+ Ettwein, Bishop John, 9, 10, 13
+
+ Evans, Lewis, 9-11, 13
+
+
+ Fair Play men, 3, 31, 35-36, 38, 40, 41, 45, 73, 77, 81-83, 92, 94, 95,
+       97, 102, 109;
+   _see also_ Tribunal, Fair Play
+
+ Faith, 17, 68, 73, 75, 98, 99
+
+ Family life, 17, 58, 64, 65, 68, 100, 110
+
+ Ferguson, Thomas, 40
+
+ Fithian, Philip Vickers, 9, 10, 13, 43, 53, 61, 66, 67, 69, 79, 82
+
+ Fleming, Betsey, 53
+
+ Fleming, John, 43, 66, 67, 69, 77, 81, 82, 85
+
+ Fleming, Robert, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87
+
+ Forster, Thomas, 26
+
+ Fort Antes, 34, 78, 80, 81, 86, 93
+
+ Fort Augusta, 22, 71, 79, 85
+
+ Fort Fleming, 81
+
+ Fort Horn, 34, 82-84, 86, 93
+
+ Fort Muncy, 34
+
+ Fort Reed, 34, 81, 83, 86
+
+ Fort Stanwix, Treaties of, 2, 3, 5-9, 12, 13, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 36,
+       67, 81, 86, 103
+
+ Forts, 64, 77, 81-83
+
+ Franklin, Benjamin, 52, 81
+
+ French, 2, 16-18, 58, 86, 95, 102
+
+ French and Indian War, 2, 16, 21
+
+
+ Galbreath, Robert, 9, 11
+
+ General Assembly, 9, 11, 79, 80, 81, 84, 86, 87, 96
+
+ George III, 84
+
+ Germans, 16-20, 24-26, 28, 54, 57, 58, 82-84, 93, 95, 102
+
+ Germantown, 78, 83
+
+ Great Island, 3, 12, 14, 34, 35, 40, 48, 67, 79, 81, 105
+
+ Great Runaway 21-23, 29, 33, 34, 71, 80, 84, 85, 88, 106
+
+ Great Shamokin Path, 47, 48
+
+ Greene County, 100, 101, 105
+
+ Grier, Rev. Isaac, 67
+
+ Grier, James, 40, 41
+
+ _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_, 40
+
+ Gristmills, 54, 64
+
+
+ Haines, Joseph, 40
+
+ Hamilton, Alexander, 43, 77, 82, 85, 86
+
+ Hamilton, Anna Jackson, 43, 44, 62, 66, 71, 107
+
+ Hamilton, John, 44
+
+ Hartley, Col. Thomas, 22, 23
+
+ Harvest, 53, 74, 95, 98, 107
+
+ Hill, Aaron, 6
+
+ Homes, 51, 52, 59, 104
+
+ Horn, Samuel, 77, 82, 83, 85
+
+ Hospitality, 60, 73
+
+ Huff, Edmund, 40, 41
+
+ Huff-Latcha (Satcha) case, 40, 41, 92
+
+ Huggins, Mr., 95
+
+ Hughes, James, 38, 39
+
+ Hughes, Thomas, 38, 39, 77, 83
+
+ _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, 36-40
+
+ Hunter, Col. Samuel, 21, 22, 84, 85
+
+
+ Immigration, 19-21, 24, 25, 28, 29
+
+ "Improvements," 37-39, 41, 58, 64, 72, 97
+
+ Indentured servitude, 64, 95
+
+ Independence, 68, 95, 103;
+   _see also_ Declaration of Independence
+
+ Indians, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 21-24, 29, 41, 42, 63, 67, 84, 86, 88,
+       94, 109
+
+ Individualism, 17, 72, 74, 98, 104, 107, 109, 110
+
+ Industry, 54, 55
+
+ Intermarriage, 58, 60
+
+ Irish, 16-18, 58, 83, 95, 102
+
+ Irwin (Irvin), James, 26, 40
+
+
+ Jamison, John, 26
+
+ Jersey Shore, 15, 19, 34, 42, 79, 84
+
+ Johnson, Sir William, 2, 21
+
+ Jones, Isaiah, 26
+
+ Juniata Valley, 20, 48
+
+
+ Kemplen, Thomas, 40, 41
+
+ Kendall, Willmoore, 91
+
+ Kincaid, Mr., 42
+
+ King, Robert, 26
+
+ King, William, 40, 41
+
+
+ Labor, 95, 99, 107
+
+ Lancaster, 70
+
+ Lancaster County, 19, 20, 38
+
+ Land claims, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38-40, 45, 62, 73, 80, 86, 92-94, 106
+
+ Land Office, 12, 21, 24, 86
+
+ Larrys Creek, 14, 15
+
+ Latcha, Jacob, 40
+
+ Law, unwritten, 37-39
+
+ Leadership, 36, 76-88, 104, 107, 108
+
+ Lewisburg, 67
+
+ Leyburn, James G., 37, 53
+
+ "Limping Messenger," 4, 8, 10
+
+ Linn, John Blair, 5-7, 20, 101
+
+ Lock Haven, 2, 14, 15, 34, 61, 81, 84, 105
+
+ Locke, John, 31
+
+ Logan, James, 16
+
+ Long, Cookson, 40, 77, 83
+
+ Love, Robert, 67
+
+ Lycoming Church, 67
+
+ Lycoming County courts, 33, 35, 36, 62, 65, 72, 94
+
+ Lycoming Creek 2-6, 9-15, 21, 24, 30, 35, 48, 67, 79, 105
+
+ Lycoming _Gazette_, 49
+
+ Lycoming Township, 28
+
+ Lydius, John Henry, 23
+
+
+ McElhattan, Pa., 84
+
+ McElhattan, William, 95, 96
+
+ McKean, Thomas, 22, 36, 37
+
+ McMeans, William, 40
+
+ MacMinn, Edwin, 78, 101
+
+ Manning, Richard, 70
+
+ Marshall, Peter, 12
+
+ Martin, John, 41
+
+ Maynard, D. S., 6, 7
+
+ Medical practices, 70, 71
+
+ Meginness, John, 4-7, 10, 20, 41, 42, 101
+
+ Methodists, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 97, 98
+
+ Milesburg, 48
+
+ Military service, 38-41, 45, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 94
+
+ Milton, 62
+
+ Ministers, itinerant, 66, 69, 71, 73
+
+ Missionaries, 67
+
+ Montgomery County, 78
+
+ Montour, Andrew, 10
+
+ Montoursville; _see_ Ostonwaken
+
+ Moravians, 78
+
+ Muhlenberg, Henry, 78
+
+ Muhlenberg, Hiester H., 9
+
+ Muncy, 14, 20, 34, 64
+
+ Muncy Creek, 20
+
+ Muncy Hills, 50
+
+ Music, 70, 100
+
+
+ National origins, 16-18, 26, 33, 36, 57, 58, 61, 64, 73, 76, 82, 83,
+       91, 93, 97, 99, 102, 105, 107
+
+ Nationalism, 99, 102, 103, 108
+
+ New Hampshire, 31
+
+ New Jersey, 19, 20
+
+ "New Purchase," 8, 11, 12, 20, 21, 24, 29, 64
+
+ New York, 19, 20, 84
+
+ Newspapers, 49
+
+ Niagara, N. Y., 8
+
+ Nippenose Valley, 42, 80
+
+ Nittany Valley, 48
+
+ Northumberland County, 24-26, 35, 38, 56, 77, 79, 80, 83, 84, 87, 106
+
+ Northumberland County courts, 33, 36, 39, 41, 48, 62, 65, 72, 94
+
+ Northumberland _Gazette_, 49
+
+ Northumberland Presbytery, 67
+
+
+ Office holding, 76, 77, 79, 87, 88, 92, 108
+
+ "Old Purchase," 11
+
+ Onondaga (Syracuse), N. Y., 8, 9
+
+ Orange County, N. Y., 20
+
+ Ostonwaken (Montoursville), 4, 8
+
+
+ Paine, Thomas, 43
+
+ Parr, James, 40
+
+ Patriotism, 71, 73-75, 98, 99, 103
+
+ Paul, William, 41
+
+ Pennamite Wars, 20
+
+ Petitions, 28, 33, 76, 86, 87, 93, 94, 103
+
+ Philadelphia, 52, 80, 81
+
+ Philadelphia County, 19, 79
+
+ Pine Creek, 2-15, 19, 30, 35, 43, 44, 48, 62, 67, 71, 79, 80, 105, 107
+
+ Pine Creek Church, 67
+
+ Pine Creek Township, 24, 28
+
+ Plymouth Colony, 31
+
+ Political equality, 17, 69, 73, 75, 91, 92, 95, 99
+
+ Pottstown, 78
+
+ Pragmatism, 99, 102, 104
+
+ "Praying societies," 66
+
+ Pre-emption, 27-29, 33, 38, 39, 58, 84, 86, 94, 97, 103
+
+ Presbyterianism, 17, 29, 33, 61-63, 65-69, 74, 97, 98, 101
+
+ Price, John, 26
+
+ Proclamation of 1763, 2, 3, 21
+
+ Property right, 35, 72
+
+
+ Quilting, 49, 60, 70, 74
+
+
+ Ranney, Austin, 91
+
+ Read, Mr., 38
+
+ Recreation, 71, 100
+
+ Reed, William, 45, 77, 82, 83
+
+ Religion, 33, 58, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 73, 74, 91-93, 96, 97, 99, 100,
+       103, 107
+
+ Revolution; _see_ American Revolution
+
+ Rhode Island, 31, 96
+
+ Roads, 48
+
+ Rodey, Peter, 36, 37
+
+
+ Schebosh, John, 4
+
+ Scotch-Irish, 16-21, 24, 25, 28-30, 33, 36, 37, 47, 53, 54, 57-60,
+       63-65, 70-72, 74, 82-84, 93, 95, 97, 101, 102, 105, 106
+
+ Scots, 16-18, 28, 58, 83, 95, 102
+
+ Self-determination, 89-91, 94, 97-99, 109
+
+ Self-reliance, 102, 103, 107
+
+ Self-sufficiency, 54, 56-58
+
+ Sergeant, Thomas, 6
+
+ Settlement, 35-37, 39, 72, 73, 90, 106
+
+ Sheshequin Path, 8-10, 48
+
+ Shickellamy, 9, 10
+
+ Shippen, Justice Edward, 39
+
+ Singmaster, Elsie, 8
+
+ Slavery, 64, 95
+
+ Smith, Charles, 38
+
+ Smith, Daniel, 38
+
+ Social compact, 31, 90
+
+ Social structure, 53, 58, 59, 64, 73, 75, 91, 97, 99-101, 103, 104,
+       107, 109
+
+ Sour's ferry, 69
+
+ Spangenburg, Bishop Augustus, 4, 8-10, 13, 78
+
+ Squatters' rights, 24, 72, 107
+
+ Stover, Martin, 9, 11
+
+ Suffrage, 33, 34, 92, 93, 96
+
+ Sunbury, 22, 47-49
+
+ Supreme Court, Pennsylvania, 36, 39
+
+ Supreme Executive Council, 44, 45, 86, 93, 94
+
+ Sweeney, Morgan, 41
+
+ Syracuse, N. Y.; _see_ Onondaga, N. Y.
+
+
+ Tax lists, 25-27, 34, 56, 59, 76, 77, 101
+
+ Temperance, 73-75, 98, 99
+
+ Tenancy, 64, 95-97
+
+ Tenure, land, 37-40, 106
+
+ Tiadaghton Creek, 2-14, 24, 105
+
+ "Tiadaghton Elm," 13, 14, 43, 71
+
+ Tilghman, James, 12
+
+ "Tomahawk right," 37
+
+ Toner, John, 41
+
+ Tools, 49, 50, 52, 53, 70, 104
+
+ Tribunal, Fair Play, 32-36, 42, 48, 50, 58, 61, 72, 73, 82, 83, 88, 90,
+       92, 94, 102, 106, 109;
+   _see also_ Fair Play men
+
+ Turner, Frederick Jackson, 1, 19, 99-102, 104, 108, 109
+
+
+ Values, 58, 65, 68, 72, 91, 97-100, 104, 107
+
+ Virginia, 72, 105
+
+ Voluntary associations, 58, 60-62
+
+
+ Walker, John, 77, 83, 86
+
+ Wallace, Paul A. W., 13, 23
+
+ Weiser, Conrad, 4, 9-11, 13
+
+ Welsh, 16-18, 26, 28, 58, 95, 102
+
+ Whitefield, George, 78
+
+ Williamsport, 2, 49
+
+ Wills, 65, 69, 72, 73, 75, 101
+
+ Winters Massacre, 23
+
+ Women, 55, 59, 60, 65
+
+ Wyoming Massacre, 21-23
+
+ Wyoming Valley, 20
+
+
+ York County, 19
+
+
+ Zeisberger, David, 4, 8, 10
+
+ Zinzendorf, Nicholas von, 78
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Endnotes
+
+    Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.
+
+    Archaic spellings in quoted material have been retained.
+
+    The following discrepancies have been noted and corrected where
+    possible:
+
+      Page 26, Chart 4. The data in column headed '1774' does not tally
+      with the total below. With no obvious solution, the table remains
+      as originally published.
+
+      Footnote 18, Chapter 3. 'See nn. 6 and 7, p. 4.' Corrected to _See
+      nn. 6 and 7, p. 33._
+
+      Footnote 20, Chapter 3. 'Supra, p. 4.' Corrected to _Supra, p. 33._
+
+      Index entry 'Economic institutions'. There is no index entry for
+      '_Farming_', however the main references to farming can found in
+      Chapter Four.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West
+Branch Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 22471-8.txt or 22471-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        http://www.gutenberg.org/2/2/4/7/22471/
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/22471-8.zip b/22471-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef46449
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-8.zip
diff --git a/22471-h.zip b/22471-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fa24dc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-h.zip
diff --git a/22471-h/22471-h.htm b/22471-h/22471-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ed6b8ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-h/22471-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,7069 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+  <head>
+    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+    <title>
+      The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch Valley, 1769-1784: A Study of Frontier Ethnography, by George D. Wolf
+    </title>
+    <style type="text/css">
+/*<![CDATA[  XML blockout */
+<!--
+    p {  margin-top: .75em;
+         text-align: justify;
+         margin-bottom: .75em;
+         }
+    h2,h3 {
+         text-align: center;
+         clear: both;
+         }
+
+    h1 {
+        font-style: italic;
+        text-align: center;
+        clear: both;
+        margin-bottom: 3em;
+        }
+
+    .ity {font-style: italic;
+          text-align: center;
+          clear: both;
+         }
+
+    h4  {text-align: center;
+         font-variant: small-caps;
+         clear: both;
+         }
+
+    hr { width: 33%;
+	 margin-top: 2em;
+	 margin-bottom: 2em;
+         margin-left: auto;
+         margin-right: auto;
+         clear: both;
+       }
+
+    table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
+
+    .peop {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 2em;}
+    .sclt {font-variant: small-caps; text-align: left;}
+    .lt     {text-align: left; vertical-align:top;}
+    .bc     {text-align: center; font-size: larger; padding-top: 1.5em;}
+    .tbgap  {text-align: center; padding-top: 0.50em;}
+    .center {text-align: center;}
+    .rt     {text-align: right;}
+
+    .tbtc   {border-bottom: 3px double black; text-align: center;}
+    .tbtl   {border-bottom: 3px double black; text-align: left;}
+    .tbb   {border-top: 1px solid black; text-align: center;}
+    .lt2     {text-align: left; padding-left: 1.5em; vertical-align:top;}
+    .lt3     {text-align: left; padding-left: 2em; vertical-align:top;}
+
+    body{margin-left: 10%;
+         margin-right: 10%;
+        }
+
+    .pagenum  {
+                position: absolute;
+                left: 92%;
+                font-size: smaller;
+                text-align: right;
+              }
+
+
+    .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;}
+
+    .smcap    {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+    .figcenter   {margin: auto; text-align: center;}
+
+    .footnotes        {border: dashed 1px; margin-top: 2em;}
+    .footnote         {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+    .footnote .label  {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+    .fnanchor         {vertical-align: 0.25em; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;}
+
+    .poem             {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;}
+    .poem br          {display: none;}
+    .poem .stanza     {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+    .poem span.i0     {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+
+    .trans1     {border: solid 1px;
+                 margin: 3em 15%; padding: 1em; text-align: left;}
+    .trans1 li  {font-size:0.9em;}
+
+    .trnhd      {text-align: center; font-size: larger; font-weight: bold;}
+
+    img {border: black solid 1px}
+
+    .moretop1     {margin-top: 4em; font-size: large; text-align: center;}
+    .moretop2     {margin-top: 2em; text-align: center;}
+
+    a:link    {text-decoration:none;}
+    a:visited {text-decoration:none;}
+
+    ul        {list-style-type: none}
+
+    .author  {text-align: left; margin-left: 65%;}
+    .bqauthor {text-align: left; margin-left: 30%; text-indent: -4em;}
+    .signing {text-align: left; margin-left: 65%; text-indent: -4em;}
+
+    // -->
+    /* XML end  ]]>*/
+    </style>
+  </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch
+Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch Valley, 1769-1784
+       A Study of Frontier Ethnography
+
+Author: George D. Wolf
+
+Release Date: August 31, 2007 [EBook #22471]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<h1>The Fair Play Settlers<br />
+of the West Branch Valley,<br />
+1769-1784:<br />
+A Study of Frontier Ethnography</h1>
+
+
+
+<p class="trnhd">BY</p>
+<h2><span class="smcap">George D. Wolf</span></h2>
+
+
+
+<p class="moretop1">Commonwealth of Pennsylvania<br />
+THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL<br />
+AND MUSEUM COMMISSION<br /><br />
+Harrisburg, 1969</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<h2>THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL<br />
+AND MUSEUM COMMISSION</h2>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table class="peop" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">James B. Stevenson</span>, <i>Chairman</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">Charles G. Webb</span>, <i>Vice Chairman</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td class="sclt" style="width: 50%;">Herman Blum</td><td class="sclt" style="width: 50%;">Mrs. Ferne Smith Hetrick</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="sclt">Mark S. Gleeson</td><td class="sclt">Mrs. Henry P. Hoffstot, Jr.</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="sclt">Ralph Hazeltine</td><td class="sclt">Maurice A. Mook</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">Thomas Elliott Wynne</span></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">David H. Kurtzman</span>, <i>ex officio<br />Superintendent of Public Instruction</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="bc">MEMBERS FROM THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">Mrs. Sarah Anderson</span>, <i>Representative</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt"><span class="smcap">Paul W. Mahady</span>, <i>Senator</i></td><td class="lt"><span class="smcap">Orville E. Snare</span>, <i>Representative</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">John H. Ware, III</span>, <i>Senator</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="bc">TRUSTEES EX OFFICIO</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">Raymond P. Shafer</span>, <i>Governor of the Commonwealth</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">Robert P. Casey</span>, <i>Auditor General</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="center"><span class="smcap">Grace M. Sloan</span>, <i>State Treasurer</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="bc">ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">Sylvester K. Stevens</span>, <i>Executive Director</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">William J. Wewer</span>, <i>Deputy Executive Director</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">Donald H. Kent</span>, <i>Director<br />Bureau of Archives and History</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">Frank J. Schmidt</span>, <i>Director<br />Bureau of Historic Sites and Properties</i></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td colspan="2" class="tbgap"><span class="smcap">William N. Richards</span>, <i>Director<br />Bureau of Museums</i></td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[Pg iii]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="Preface" id="Preface"></a><i>Preface</i></h2>
+
+
+<p>In an Age when man's horizons are constantly being widened
+to include hitherto little-known or non-existent countries, and
+even other planets and outer space, there is still much to be said
+for the oft-neglected study of man in his more immediate environs.
+Intrigued with the historical tale of the "Fair Play settlers" of the
+West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna River and practically a life-long
+resident of the West Branch Valley, this writer felt that their
+story was worth telling and that it might offer some insight into
+the development of democracy on the frontier. The result is an
+ethnography of the Fair Play settlers. This account, however, is not
+meant to typify the frontier experience; it is simply an illustration,
+and, the author hopes, a useful one.</p>
+
+<p>No intensive research can be conducted without the help and encouragement
+of many fine and wonderful people. This author is
+deeply indebted to librarians, archivists and historians, local historians
+and genealogists, local and county historical societies, and
+collectors of manuscripts, diaries, and journals pertinent to the history
+of the West Branch Valley. A comprehensive listing of all who
+have assisted in this effort would be too extensive, but certain persons
+cannot be ignored. My grateful appreciation is here expressed to a
+few of these; but my gratitude is no less sincere to the many persons
+who are not here mentioned.</p>
+
+<p>Librarians who have been most helpful in providing bibliographies,
+checking files, and obtaining volumes from other libraries include
+Miss Isabel Welch, of the Ross Library in Lock Haven; Mrs.
+Kathleen Chandler, formerly of the Lock Haven State College library;
+and Miss Barbara Ault, of the Library of Congress.</p>
+
+<p>Archivists and historians who have been most generous in their
+aid are the late Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, of the Pennsylvania Historical
+and Museum Commission; Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, of Collegeville;
+Dr. Alfred P. James, of the University of Pittsburgh; and
+Mrs. Solon J. Buck, of Washington, D. C.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[Pg iv]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the most significant research support for this investigation
+was provided by a local historian and genealogist, Mrs. Helen Herritt
+Russell, of Jersey Shore.</p>
+
+<p>Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, of the Pennsylvania State University,
+analyzed the Fair Play settlers using linguistic techniques to determine
+their national origins. This help was basic to the demographic
+portion of this study.</p>
+
+<p>Dr. Charles F. Berkheimer and Mrs. Marshall Anspach, both of
+Williamsport, magnanimously consented to loan this author their
+copies, respectively, of William Colbert's <i>Journal</i> and the Wagner
+Collection of Revolutionary War Pension Claims.</p>
+
+<p>County and local historical societies which opened their collections
+for study were the Clinton County Historical Society, the Lycoming
+Historical Society, the Northumberland County Historical Society,
+the Centre County Historical Society, the Greene County Historical
+Society, and the Muncy Historical Society and Museum of History.</p>
+
+<p>For his refreshing criticisms and constant encouragement, Dr. Murray
+G. Murphey, of the University of Pennsylvania, will find me forever
+thankful. Without him, this study would not have been possible.</p>
+
+<p>The author would like to thank the members of the Pennsylvania
+Historical and Museum Commission and its Executive Director, Dr.
+S. K. Stevens, for making possible this publication; he would also like
+to thank Mr. Donald H. Kent, Director of the Bureau of Archives and
+History, and Mr. William A. Hunter, Chief of the Division of History,
+who supervised publication; and members of the staff of the Division
+of History: Mr. Harold L. Myers, Associate Historian and Chief of
+the Editorial Section, who readied the manuscript for publication;
+Mrs. Gail M. Gibson, Associate Historian, who prepared the index;
+and Mr. George R. Beyer, Assistant Historian.</p>
+
+<p>My sincerest thanks are also extended to Mrs. Mary B. Bower, who
+typed the entire manuscript and offered useful suggestions with regard
+to style.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, for providing almost ideal conditions for carrying on this
+work and for sustaining me throughout, my wife, Margaret, is deserving
+of a gratitude which cannot be fully expressed.</p>
+
+<p class="author"><span class="smcap">George D. Wolf</span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="Introduction" id="Introduction"></a><i>Introduction</i></h2>
+
+
+<p>Between 1769 and 1784, in an area some twenty-five miles long
+and about two miles wide, located on the north side of the
+West Branch of the Susquehanna River and extending from
+Lycoming Creek (at the present Williamsport) to the Great Island
+(just east of the present Lock Haven), some 100 to 150 families settled.
+They established a community and a political organization
+called the Fair Play system. This study is about these people and
+their system.</p>
+
+<p>The author of a recent case study of democracy in a frontier
+county commented on the need for this kind of investigation.<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> Cognizant
+of the fact that a number of valuable histories of American
+communities have been written, he noted that few of them deal explicitly
+with the actual relation of frontier experience to democracy:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>No one seems to have studied microscopically a given area
+that experienced transition from wilderness to settled community
+with the purpose of determining how much democracy,
+in Turner's sense, existed initially in the first phase of
+settlement, during the process itself, and in the period that
+immediately followed.</p></div>
+
+<p>This research encompasses the first two stages of that development
+and includes tangential references to the third stage.</p>
+
+<p>The geography of the Fair Play territory has been confused for almost
+two centuries. The conclusions of this analysis will not prove
+too satisfying to those who unquestioningly accept and revere the old
+local legends. However, it will be noted that these conclusions are
+based upon the accounts of journalists and diarists rather than hearsay.
+This should put the controversial "question of the Tiadaghton"
+to rest.</p>
+
+<p>A statistical analysis has been made as a significant part of the
+demography of the Fair Play settlers. However, limitations in data
+may raise some questions regarding the validity of the conclusions.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[Pg vi]</a></span>
+Nevertheless, the national and ethnic origins of these settlers, their
+American sources of emigration, the periods of immigration, the
+reasons for migration, and population stability and mobility have
+all been investigated. The result offers some surprises when compared
+with the trends of the time&mdash;in the Province and throughout
+the colonies.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>politics</i> of Fair Play is the principal concern of this entire
+study&mdash;appropriately, it was from their political system that these
+frontiersmen derived their unusual name. This was not the only
+group to use the name, however. Another "fair play system" existed
+in southwestern Pennsylvania during the same period, and perhaps
+a similar study can be made of those pioneers and their life.
+As for the Fair Play community of the West Branch, we know about
+its political structure through the cases subsequently reviewed by established
+courts of the Commonwealth. From these cases, we have
+reconstructed a "code" of operation which demonstrates certain
+democratic tendencies.</p>
+
+<p>In addition to studying the political system, an effort has been
+made to validate the story of the locally-famed Pine Creek Declaration
+of Independence. Although some evidence for such a declaration
+was found, it seems inconclusive.</p>
+
+<p>The West Branch Valley was part of what Turner called the second
+frontier, the Allegheny, and so this agrarian frontier community has
+been examined for evidence of the democratic traits which Turner
+characterized as particularly American. This analysis is not meant
+to portray a typical situation, but it does provide support for Turner's
+evaluation. As this was a farmer's frontier, and as transportation
+and communication facilities were extremely limited, a generally
+self-sufficient and naturally self-reliant community developed as a
+matter of survival. The characteristics which this frontier nurtured,
+and the non-English&mdash;even anti-English&mdash;composition of its population
+make understandable the sentiment in this region for independence
+from Great Britain. This, of course, is supremely demonstrated
+in the separate declaration of independence drawn, according to the
+report, by the settlers of the Fair Play frontier.</p>
+
+<p>Fair Play <i>society</i> is, perhaps, the second-most-important facet of
+this ethnographic analysis. An understanding of it necessitated an
+inquiry into the social relationships, the religious institutions, the
+educational and cultural opportunities, and the values of this frontier
+community. The results, again, lend credence to Turner's hypothesis.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span>
+Admittedly, Turner's bold assertion that "the growth of
+nationalism and the evolution of American political institutions were
+dependent on the advance of the frontier" is somewhat contradicted
+by the nature of this Pennsylvania frontier. Western lands in Pennsylvania
+were either Provincial, Commonwealth, or Indian lands, but
+never national lands. As a result, western land ordinances, and the
+whole controversy which accompanied the ratification of the Articles
+of Confederation, had no real significance in Pennsylvania. However,
+in subsequent years, the expansion of internal improvement
+legislation and nationalism sustains Turner's thesis, as does the democratic
+and non-sectional nature of the middle colonial region generally.<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p>
+
+<p>The <i>intellectual character</i> which the frontier spawned has been
+described as rationalistic. However, this was a rationalism which was
+not at odds with empiricism, but which was more in line with what
+has been called the American philosophy, pragmatism. Or, to put it
+in the vernacular, "if it works, it's good." The frontiersman was a
+trial-and-error empiricist, who believed in his own ability to fathom
+the depths of the problems which plagued him. If the apparent
+solution contradicted past patterns and interpretations, he justified
+his actions in terms of the realities of the moment. It is this
+pragmatic ratio-empiricism which we imply when we use the term
+"rationalistic."</p>
+
+<p>An examination of the role of <i>leadership</i>, suggested by the Curti
+study, presents the first summary of this type for the West Branch
+Valley. Here, too, the limited numbers of this frontier population,
+combined with its peculiar tendency to rely upon peripheral residents
+for top leadership, prevents any broad generalizations. The nature
+of its leadership can only be interpreted in terms of this particular
+group in this specific location.</p>
+
+<p>The last two chapters of this study are summary chapters. The
+first of these is an analysis of democracy on one segment of the
+Pennsylvania frontier. Arbitrarily defining democracy, certain objective
+criteria were set up to evaluate it in the Fair Play territory.
+Political democracy was investigated in terms of popular sovereignty,
+political equality, popular consultation, and majority rule, and the
+political system was judged on the basis of these principles. Social<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span>
+democracy was ascertained through inquiries concerning religious
+freedom, the social class system, and economic opportunity. The
+conclusion is that, for this frontier at least, democratic tendencies
+were displayed in various contexts.</p>
+
+<p>The final chapter, although relying to a large extent upon Turner's
+great work, is in no way intended to be a critical evaluation of that
+thesis. Its primary objective is to test one interpretation of it through
+a particular analytic technique, ethnographic in nature. Frontier
+ethnography has proved to be a reliable research tool, mainly because
+of its wide scope. It permits conclusions which a strictly confined
+study, given the data limitations of this and other frontier areas,
+would not allow.</p>
+
+<p>Democracy, it is no doubt agreed, is a difficult thing to assess, particularly
+when there are so many conflicting interpretations of it.
+But an examination of it, even in its most primitive stages in this
+country, can give the researcher a glimpse of its fundamentals and
+its effectiveness. In a time when idealists envision a world community
+based upon the self-determination which was basic in this
+nation's early development, it is essential to re-evaluate that principle
+in terms of its earliest American development. If we would enjoy
+the blessings of freedom, we must undergo the fatigue of
+attempting to understand it.</p>
+
+<p>Some seventy years ago, a great American historian suggested an
+interpretation of the American ethos. Turner's thesis is still being
+debated today, something which I am certain would please its author
+immensely. But what is needed today is not the prolongation of the
+debate as to its validity so much as the investigation of it with newer
+techniques which, it might be added, Turner himself suggested.
+This is the merit of frontier ethnography, and, perhaps, the particular
+value of this study.</p>
+
+<p>To me, Robert Frost implied as much in his wonderful "Stopping
+by Woods on a Snowy Evening." Yes, the "woods" of contemporary
+history are "lovely, dark and deep,</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">But I have promises to keep,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">And miles to go before I sleep,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">And miles to go before I sleep."<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>It is hoped that this investigation is the beginning of the answer
+to that promise, but it is well-recognized that there are miles to go.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Merle Curti <i>et al.</i>, <i>The Making of an American Community: A Case Study of
+Democracy in a Frontier County</i> (Stanford, 1959), p. 3.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> <i>Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of Frederick Jackson Turner</i>, intro. by Ray
+Allen Billington (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1961), pp. 52-55.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2><a name="Table_of_Contents" id="Table_of_Contents"></a><i>Table of Contents</i></h2>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width: 60%;">
+
+<tr><td class="rt" style="width: 10%;">&nbsp;</td><td class="sclt">Preface</td><td class="rt" style="width: 10%;"><a href="#Page_iii">iii</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">&nbsp;</td><td class="sclt">Introduction</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_v">v</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">I.</td><td class="sclt">Fair Play Territory: Geography and Topography</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">II.</td><td class="sclt">The Fair Play Settlers: Demographic Factors</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_16">16</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">III.</td><td class="sclt">The Politics of Fair Play</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_30">30</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">IV.</td><td class="sclt">The Farmers' Frontier</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_47">47</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">V.</td><td class="sclt">Fair Play Society</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">VI.</td><td class="sclt">Leadership and the Problems of the Frontier</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">VII.</td><td class="sclt">Democracy on the Pennsylvania Frontier</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_89">89</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">VIII.</td><td class="sclt">Frontier Ethnography and the Turner Thesis</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">&nbsp;</td><td class="sclt">Bibliography</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_113">113</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="rt">&nbsp;</td><td class="sclt">Index</td><td class="rt"><a href="#Page_119">119</a></td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 600px;">
+<a href="images/010.png"><img src="images/010t.png" width="600" height="403" alt="" title="" /></a>
+</div>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_ONE" id="CHAPTER_ONE"></a><small>CHAPTER ONE</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>Fair Play Territory: Geography and Topography</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>The Colonial period of American history has been of primary
+concern to the historian because of its fundamental importance
+in the development of American civilization. What
+the American pioneers encountered, particularly in the interior settlements,
+was, basically, a frontier experience. An ethnographic analysis
+of one part of the Provincial frontier of Pennsylvania indicates
+the significance of that colonial influence. The "primitive agricultural
+democracy" of this frontier illustrates the "style of life" which provided
+the basis for a distinctly "American" culture which emerged
+from the colonial experience.<a name="FNanchor_1_3" id="FNanchor_1_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_3" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p>
+
+<p>While this writer's approach is dominantly Turnerian, this study
+does not necessarily contend that this Pennsylvania frontier was typical
+of the general colonial experience, nor that this ethnographic
+analysis presents in microcosm the development of the American
+ethos. However, on this farmer's frontier there was adequate evidence
+of the composite nationality, the self-reliance, the independence,
+and the nationalistic and rationalistic traits which Turner characterized
+as American.</p>
+
+<p>In his famed essay on "The Significance of the Frontier," Turner
+saw the frontier as the crucible in which the English, Scotch-Irish, and
+Palatine Germans were merged into a new and distinctly American
+nationality, no longer characteristically English.<a name="FNanchor_2_4" id="FNanchor_2_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_4" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> The Pennsylvania
+frontier, with its dominant Scotch-Irish and German influence, is a
+case in point.</p>
+
+<p>The Fair Play territory of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna
+River, the setting for this analysis, was part of what Turner
+called the second frontier, the Allegheny Mountains.<a name="FNanchor_3_5" id="FNanchor_3_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_5" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Located about<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>
+ninety miles up the Susquehanna from the present State capital at
+Harrisburg, and extending some twenty-five-odd miles westward between
+the present cities of Williamsport and Lock Haven, this
+territory was the heartland of the central Pennsylvania frontier in
+the decade preceding the American Revolution.</p>
+
+<p>The term "Fair Play settlers," used to designate the inhabitants
+of this region, is derived from the extra-legal political system which
+these democratic forerunners set up to maintain order in their
+developing community. Being squatters and, consequently, without
+the bounds of any established political agency, they formed their
+own government, and labeled it "Fair Play."</p>
+
+<p>However, despite the apparent simplicity of the above geographic
+description, the exact boundaries of the Fair Play territory have
+been debated for almost two centuries. Before we can assess the democratic
+traits of the Fair Play settlers, we must first clearly define what
+is meant by the Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>The terminal points in this analysis are 1768 and 1784, the dates
+of the two Indian treaties made at Fort Stanwix (now Rome), New
+York. The former opened up the Fair Play territory to settlement,
+and the latter brought it within the limits of the Commonwealth of
+Pennsylvania, thus legalizing the <i>de facto</i> political structure which
+had developed in the interim.</p>
+
+<p>According to the treaty of 1768, negotiated by Sir William Johnson
+with the Indians of the Six Nations, the western line of colonial
+settlement was extended from the Allegheny Mountains, previously
+set by the Proclamation of 1763, to a line extending to the mouth of
+Lycoming Creek, which empties into the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+River. The creek is referred to as the Tiadaghton in the
+original of the treaty.<a name="FNanchor_4_6" id="FNanchor_4_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_6" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> The question of whether Pine Creek or
+Lycoming Creek was the Tiadaghton is the first major question of
+this investigation. The map which faces page one outlines the
+territory in question.</p>
+
+<p>Following the successful eviction of the French in the French and
+Indian War, the American counterpart of the Seven Years' War, the
+crown sought a more orderly westward advance than had been the
+rule. Heretofore, the establishment of frontier settlements had stirred<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span>
+up conflict with the Indians and brought frontier pleas to the colonial
+assemblies for military support and protection. The result was
+greater pressure on the already depleted exchequer. The opinion
+that a more controlled and less expensive westward advance could
+be accomplished is reflected in the Royal Proclamation of 1763.</p>
+
+<p>This proclamation has frequently been misinterpreted as a definite
+effort to deprive the colonies of their western lands. The very language
+of the document contradicts this. For example, the expression
+"for the present, and until our further pleasure be known" clearly
+indicates the tentative nature of the proclamation, which was "to
+prevent [the repetition of] such irregularities for the future" with
+the Indians, irregularities which had prompted Pontiac's Rebellion.<a name="FNanchor_5_7" id="FNanchor_5_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_7" class="fnanchor">[5]</a>
+The orderly advancement of this colonial frontier was to be accomplished
+through subsequent treaties with the Indians. The Treaty
+of Fort Stanwix in 1768 is one such example of those treaties.<a name="FNanchor_6_8" id="FNanchor_6_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_8" class="fnanchor">[6]</a></p>
+
+<p>The term "Fair Play settlers" refers to the residents of the area
+between Lycoming Creek and the Great Island on the north side of
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, and to those who interacted
+with them, during the period 1769-1784, when that area was
+outside of the Provincial limits. The appellation stems from the
+annual designation by the settlers of "Fair Play Men," a tribunal of
+three with quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial authority over the
+residents.</p>
+
+<p>The relevance of the first Stanwix Treaty to the geographic area
+of this study is a matter of the utmost importance. The western
+boundary of that treaty in the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna
+has been a source of some confusion because of the employment
+of the name "Tiadaghton" in the treaty to designate that boundary.
+The question, quite simply, is whether Pine Creek or Lycoming is the
+Tiadaghton. If Pine Creek is the Tiadaghton, an extra-legal political
+organization would have been unnecessary, for the so-called Fair<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span>
+Play settlers of this book would have been under Provincial jurisdiction.<a name="FNanchor_7_9" id="FNanchor_7_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_9" class="fnanchor">[7]</a>
+The designation of Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton tends
+to give geographic corroboration for the Fair Play system.</p>
+
+<p>First and foremost among the Pine Creek supporters is John
+Meginness, the nineteenth-century historian of the West Branch
+Valley. His work is undoubtedly the most often quoted source of
+information on the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna, and
+rightfully so. Although he wrote when standards of documentation
+were lax and relied to an extent upon local legendry as related by
+aged residents, Meginness' views have a general validity. However,
+there is some question regarding his judgment concerning the
+boundary issue.</p>
+
+<p>Quoting directly from the journal of Moravian Bishop Augustus
+Spangenburg, who visited the West Branch Valley in 1745 in the
+company of Conrad Weiser, David Zeisberger, and John Schebosh,
+Meginness describes the Bishop's travel from Montoursville, or
+Ostonwaken as the Indians called it, to the "Limping Messenger,"
+or "Diadachton Creek," where the party camped for the night.<a name="FNanchor_8_10" id="FNanchor_8_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_10" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> It<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span>
+is interesting to note that the Moravian journalist refers here to
+Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton, some twenty-three years prior
+to the purchase at Fort Stanwix, which made the question a local
+issue. Yet Meginness, in a footnote written better than a hundred
+years later, says that "It afterwards turned out that the true <i>Diadachton</i>
+or <i>Tiadachton</i>, was what is now known as Pine Creek."<a name="FNanchor_9_11" id="FNanchor_9_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_11" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>Perhaps Meginness was influenced by the aged sources of some of
+his accounts. It may be, however, that he was merely repeating the
+judgment of an earlier generation which had sought to legalize its
+settlement made prior to the second Stanwix Treaty. The Indian
+description of the boundary line in the Fort Stanwix Treaty of 1768
+may also have had some impact upon Meginness. Regardless, a comparison
+of data, pro and con, will demonstrate that the Tiadaghton
+is Lycoming Creek.</p>
+
+<p>John Blair Linn, of Bellefonte, stood second to Meginness in
+popular repute as historian of the West Branch Valley. However, he
+too calls Pine Creek the Tiadaghton, though the reliability of his
+sources is questionable. Unlike Meginness, whose judgment derived
+somewhat from interviews with contemporaries of the period, Linn
+based his contention upon the statements made by the Indians at the
+second Stanwix Treaty meeting in 1784.<a name="FNanchor_10_12" id="FNanchor_10_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_12" class="fnanchor">[10]</a></p>
+
+<p>At those sessions on October 22 and 23, 1784, the Pennsylvania
+commissioners twice questioned the deputies of the Six Nations about
+the location of the Tiadaghton, and were told twice that it was Pine
+Creek.<a name="FNanchor_11_13" id="FNanchor_11_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_13" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> In the first instance, Samuel J. Atlee, speaking for the other
+Pennsylvania commissioners, called attention to the last deed made
+at Fort Stanwix in 1768 and asked the question about the Tiadaghton:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>This last deed, brothers, with the map annexed, are
+descriptive of the purchase made sixteen years ago at this
+place; one of the boundary lines calls for a creek by the name
+of <i>Tyadoghton</i>, we wish our brothers the Six Nations to
+explain to us clearly which you call the <i>Tyadoghton</i>, as
+there are two creeks issuing from the <i>Burnet's Hills</i>, <i>Pine</i>
+and <i>Lycoming</i>.<a name="FNanchor_12_14" id="FNanchor_12_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_14" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Captain Aaron Hill, a Mohawk chief, responded for the Indians:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>With regard to the creek called <i>Tyadoghton</i>, mentioned
+in your deed of 1768, we have already answered you, and
+again repeat it, it is the same you call <i>Pine Creek</i>, being the
+largest emptying into the west branch of the <i>Susquehannah</i>.<a name="FNanchor_13_15" id="FNanchor_13_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_15" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>This, of course, was the "more positive answer" which the Indians
+had promised after the previous day's interrogation.<a name="FNanchor_14_16" id="FNanchor_14_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_16" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> It substantiated
+the description given in the discussions preceding the Fort Stanwix
+Treaty of 1768.<a name="FNanchor_15_17" id="FNanchor_15_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_17" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> However, the map illustrating the treaty line,
+although tending to support this view, is subject to interpretation.<a name="FNanchor_16_18" id="FNanchor_16_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_18" class="fnanchor">[16]</a>
+Regardless, this record of the treaty sessions provides the strongest
+evidence to sustain the Pine Creek view.</p>
+
+<p>There is little doubt that Meginness and Linn were influenced by
+the record. This is certainly true of D. S. Maynard, a lesser nineteenth-century
+historian, whose work is obviously based upon the research
+of Meginness. Maynard repeated the evidence of his predecessor from
+the account of Thomas Sergeant by describing the Stanwix Treaty<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span>
+line of 1768 as coming "across to the headwaters of Pine Creek."
+Maynard's utter dependence upon Meginness suggests that his evidence
+is more repetitive than substantive.<a name="FNanchor_17_19" id="FNanchor_17_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_19" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>
+
+<p>A more recent student of local history, Eugene P. Bertin, of Muncy,
+gives Pine Creek his undocumented support, which appears to be
+nothing more than an elaboration of the accounts of Meginness and
+Linn.<a name="FNanchor_18_20" id="FNanchor_18_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_20" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> Dr. Bertin's account appears to be better folklore than
+history.<a name="FNanchor_19_21" id="FNanchor_19_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_21" class="fnanchor">[19]</a></p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span></p><p>Another twentieth-century writer, Elsie Singmaster, offers more
+objective support for Pine Creek, although her argument appears to
+be better semantics than geography.<a name="FNanchor_20_22" id="FNanchor_20_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_22" class="fnanchor">[20]</a></p>
+
+<p>Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, in his biography of David Zeisberger,
+errs in his interpretation of the term "Limping Messenger" (Tiadaghton),
+used by Bishop Spangenburg in his account of their journey to
+the West Branch Valley in 1745. He notes that on their way to
+Onondaga (Syracuse) after leaving "Ostonwaken" (Montoursville)
+they passed through the valley of Tiadaghton Creek. They were following
+the Sheshequin Path. But he identifies the Tiadaghton with
+Pine Creek. There was an Indian path up Pine Creek, but it led to
+Niagara, not Onondaga.<a name="FNanchor_21_23" id="FNanchor_21_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_23" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p>
+
+<p>Aside from the designation by the Indians at the second Stanwix
+Treaty, there is only one other source which lends any credibility
+to the Pine Creek view, and that is Smith's <i>Laws of the Commonwealth
+of Pennsylvania</i>. After the last treaty was made acquiring Pennsylvania
+lands from the Indians, the legislature, in order to quell disputes
+about the right of occupancy in this "New Purchase,"<a name="FNanchor_22_24" id="FNanchor_22_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_24" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> passed
+the following legislation:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>And whereas divers persons, who have heretofore occupied
+and cultivated small tracts of land, without the bounds of
+the purchase made, as aforesaid, in the year of our Lord one
+thousand seven hundred and sixty-eight, and within the purchase
+made, or now to be made, by the said commissioners,
+have, by their resolute stand and sufferings during the late
+war, merited, that those settlers should have the pre-emption
+of their respective plantations:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><i>Be it therefore enacted by the authority aforesaid</i>, That all
+and every person or persons, and their legal representatives,
+who has or have heretofore settled on the north side of the
+west branch of the river Susquehanna, upon the Indian territory,
+between Lycomick or Lycoming creek on the east, and
+Tyagaghton or Pine creek on the west, as well as other lands
+within the said residuary purchase from the Indians, of the
+territory within this state, excepting always the lands herein
+before excepted, shall be allowed a right of pre-emption to
+their respective possessions, at the price aforesaid.<a name="FNanchor_23_25" id="FNanchor_23_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_25" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>It may be worth observing, however, that legislation tends to reflect
+popular demand rather than the hard facts of a situation. In this
+case the settlers of the region prior to 1780 stood to benefit by this
+legislation and formed an effective pressure group.</p>
+
+<p>The contrary view in this long-standing geographical debate is
+based, for the most part, upon the records of journalists and diarists
+who traveled along the West Branch <i>prior</i> to the first Stanwix Treaty
+and who thus had no axe to grind.</p>
+
+<p>That the Lycoming Creek was in fact the Tiadaghton referred to
+by the Indians at Fort Stanwix in 1768 is strongly indicated by the
+weight of evidence derived from the journals of Conrad Weiser (1737),
+John Bartram (1743), Bishop Spangenburg (1745), Moravian Bishop
+John Ettwein (1772), and the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian (1775).
+In addition, the maps of Lewis Evans (1749) and John Adlum (1792),
+the land applications of Robert Galbreath and Martin Stover (1769),
+and a 1784 statute of the Pennsylvania General Assembly all tend
+to validate Lycoming's claim to recognition as the Tiadaghton. Each
+datum has merit in the final analysis, which justifies the specific
+examination which follows:</p>
+
+<p>Supporting evidence is found in Weiser's German journal, which
+was meant for his family and friends, and translated into English by
+his great-grandson, Hiester H. Muhlenberg. (Weiser also kept an
+English journal for the Council at Philadelphia.) Weiser wrote:
+"The stream we are now on the Indians call Dia-daclitu, (die berirte,
+the lost or bewildered) which in fact deserves such a name."<a name="FNanchor_24_26" id="FNanchor_24_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_26" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> (This
+is an obvious misspelling of Diadachton.) Weiser was following the
+Sheshequin Path with Shickellamy to Onondaga and this entry is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span>
+recorded on March 25, 1737, long before there was any question
+about the Tiadaghton.</p>
+
+<p>There seems to be some confusion over Bishop Spangenburg's use
+of the term "Limping Messenger" in his journal for June 8, 1745.
+He too was traveling the Sheshequin Path with David Zeisberger,
+Conrad Weiser, Shickellamy, Andrew Montour, <i>et al.</i> He describes
+the "Limping Messenger" as a camp on the "Tiadachton" (Lycoming),
+whereas DeSchweinitz in his <i>Zeisberger</i> interprets the term to mean
+Pine Creek.<a name="FNanchor_25_27" id="FNanchor_25_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_27" class="fnanchor">[25]</a></p>
+
+<p>Another traveler along the Sheshequin Path was the colonial botanist,
+John Bartram. Bartram, in the company of Weiser and Lewis
+Evans, the map maker, notes in his diary of July 12, 1743, riding
+"down [up] a valley to a point, a prospect of an opening bearing N,
+then down the hill to a run and over a rich neck lying between it and
+the Tiadaughton."<a name="FNanchor_26_28" id="FNanchor_26_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_28" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> Incidentally, the editor of this extract from
+Bartram's journal makes the quite devastating point that Meginness
+did not know of Bartram's journal, which was published in London
+in 1751 but which did not appear in America until 1895.<a name="FNanchor_27_29" id="FNanchor_27_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_29" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p>
+
+<p>One of the Moravian journalists who visited the scenic Susquehanna
+along the West Branch was Bishop John Ettwein, who passed
+through this valley on his way to Ohio in 1772. He wrote of "Lycoming
+Creek, [as the stream] which marks the boundary line of lands
+purchased from the Indians."<a name="FNanchor_28_30" id="FNanchor_28_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_30" class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the most interesting and informative diarist who journeyed
+along the West Branch was the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian.
+Fithian came to what we will establish as Fair Play country on July
+25, 1775, at what he called "Lacommon Creek." His conclusion was
+that this creek was the Tiadaghton.<a name="FNanchor_29_31" id="FNanchor_29_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_31" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> It is this same Fithian, it might
+be added, whose Virginia journals were the primary basis for the
+reconstruction of colonial Williamsburg.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span></p>
+<p>The work of colonial cartographers also substantiates the claim
+that Lycoming Creek is the Tiadaghton. Both Lewis Evans, following
+his 1743 journey in the company of Bartram and Weiser,
+and John Adlum, who conducted a survey of the West Branch Valley
+in 1792 for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, failed to label
+Pine Creek as the "Tiadaghton" on their maps.<a name="FNanchor_30_32" id="FNanchor_30_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_32" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> In fact, Adlum's
+map of 1792, found among the papers of William Bingham, designates
+the area east of Lycoming Creek as the "Old Purchase." Furthermore,
+as is the case with Evans' map, Adlum does not apply
+the Tiadaghton label to either Pine Creek or Lycoming Creek.<a name="FNanchor_31_33" id="FNanchor_31_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_33" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p>
+
+<p>Two applications in 1769 for land in the New Purchase show that
+the Tiadaghton, or in this case "Ticadaughton," can only be Lycoming
+Creek. The application of Robert Galbreath (no. 1823)
+is described as "Bounded on one side by the Proprietor's tract at
+Lycoming." Martin Stover applied for the same tract (application
+no. 2611), which is described as "below the mouth of Ticadaughton
+Creek."<a name="FNanchor_32_34" id="FNanchor_32_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_34" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> The copies of these two applications, together with the
+copy of the survey, offer irrefutable proof of the validity of Lycoming's
+claim.</p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the final note is the action of the General Assembly of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on December 12, 1784.<a name="FNanchor_33_35" id="FNanchor_33_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_35" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> The legislators
+affirmed the judgments of the frontier journalists, whose recorded
+journeys offer the best proof that the Lycoming is the Tiadaghton.
+Prior to this action, the Provincial authorities had issued
+a proclamation on September 20, 1773, prohibiting settlement west
+of Lycoming Creek by white persons. Violators were to be apprehended
+and tried. The penalties were real and quite severe: &pound;500
+fine, twelve months in prison without bail, and a guarantee of twelve
+months of exemplary conduct after release.<a name="FNanchor_34_36" id="FNanchor_34_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_36" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> Court records, however,
+fail to indicate any prosecutions.</p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span></p><p>Finally, the latest scholar to delve into the complexities of the Stanwix
+treaties, Professor Peter Marshall, says that there was no prolonged
+and close discussion about the running of the treaty line in Pennsylvania
+(the Tiadaghton question), no discussion in any way comparable
+to that which took place over its location in New York.<a name="FNanchor_35_37" id="FNanchor_35_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_37" class="fnanchor">[35]</a></p>
+
+<p>In summary then, it appears that the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in
+1768 was responsible for opening the West Branch Valley to settlement,
+such settlement being stimulated by the opening of the Land
+Office in Philadelphia on April 3, 1769. James Tilghman, secretary
+of the Land Office, published the notice of his office's willingness "to
+receive applications from all persons inclinable to take up lands in
+the New Purchase."<a name="FNanchor_36_38" id="FNanchor_36_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_38" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> The enthusiasm generated by the opening of
+the Land Office is shown by the better than 2,700 applications received
+on the very first day. However, the question of the Tiadaghton
+came to be a source of real contention. The ambiguity of the Indian
+references to the western boundary of the first Stanwix Treaty led
+the eager settlers, who were seeking to legitimize claims in the area
+between Lycoming and Pine creeks, to favor Pine Creek. There was
+substance to the settlers' claim.</p>
+
+<p>The significance of the boundary question to this study is better
+understood when it is recognized that the so-called Fair Play system
+of government in lands beyond the Provincial limits must have a
+definable locale. It is this writer's firm conviction that Fair Play
+territory extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the
+West Branch of the Susquehanna, to the Great Island, some five miles
+west of Pine Creek. The foundation for the establishment of Lycoming
+Creek as the Tiadaghton, and consequently, as the eastern
+boundary of the Fair Play territory is apparent once all the evidence<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span>
+is examined. Aside from the comments of the Indians at the treaty
+negotiations and Smith's <i>Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania</i>,
+there are only secondary accounts with little documentation to
+sustain the Pine Creek argument.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, the Lycoming Creek claim is buttressed by
+such primary sources as the journals of Weiser, Bartram, Spangenberg,
+Ettwein, and Fithian, three of which were written before the
+location of the Tiadaghton became a subject of dispute. Since none
+of these men was seeking lands, they can be considered impartial observers.
+Furthermore, the cartographic efforts of Lewis Evans and
+John Adlum followed actual visits to the region and say nothing to
+favor the Pine Creek view.</p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the Indians were merely accepting an already accomplished
+fact at the meeting in 1784. Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace says
+that this would have been expected from the subservient, pacified
+Indian. Regardless, the Provincial leadership made no effort to settle
+the lands in what some called "the disputed territory" until after
+the later agreement at Stanwix; in fact, they discouraged it.<a name="FNanchor_37_39" id="FNanchor_37_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_39" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> The
+simple desire for legitimacy gives us very little to go on in the light
+of more than adequate documentation of the justice of the Lycoming
+view.</p>
+
+<p>This evidence might suggest changing the name of the long-revered
+"Tiadaghton Elm" to the "Pine Creek Elm" and bringing to a close
+the vexatious question of the Tiadaghton. However let us strike a
+note of caution, if not humility. Indian place names had a way of
+shifting, doubling, and moving, since they served largely as descriptive
+terms and not as true place names. It is not at all unusual to find
+the same name applied to several places or to find names migrating.
+The Tiadaghton could have been Lycoming Creek to some Indians
+at one time, and Pine Creek to others at the same or another time.
+Consider, for example, that there were three Miami rivers in present
+Ohio, which are now known as the Miami, the Little Miami, and
+the Maumee. It hardly makes any real difference to the geography
+of the Fair Play territory, or to the delimiting of its boundaries, which
+stream was the Tiadaghton. Actually, it was the doubt about it
+which drew in the squatters and created Fair Play. These settlers<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span>
+justified their contention that the Tiadaghton was Pine Creek by
+moving into the territory and holding onto it. This may be reason
+enough for calling the famous tree the Tiadaghton Elm, even if early
+travelers and the proprietary officials said that the Tiadaghton was
+Lycoming Creek.<a name="FNanchor_38_40" id="FNanchor_38_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_40" class="fnanchor">[38]</a></p>
+
+<p>The topography of the region also influenced the delineation of
+what we call Fair Play territory. The jugular vein which supplies
+the life-blood to this region is undoubtedly the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River. This branch of the great river, which drains
+almost fifty per cent of the State, follows a northeasterly course of
+some forty miles from the Great Island, which is just east of present
+Lock Haven, to what is now Muncy, then turns southward.<a name="FNanchor_39_41" id="FNanchor_39_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_41" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p>
+
+<p>The West Branch of the mighty Susquehanna, which has plagued
+generations of residents with its spring floodings, was the primary
+means of ingress and egress for the area. Rich bottom lands at the
+mouths of Lycoming, Larrys, and Pine creeks drew the hardy pioneer
+farmers, and here they worked the soil to provide the immediate
+needs for survival. Hemmed in on the north by the plateau area of
+the Appalachian front and on the south by the Bald Eagle Mountains,
+these courageous pioneers of frontier democracy carved their future
+out of the two-mile area (more often less) between those two forbidding
+natural walls. With the best lands to be found around the
+mouth of Pine Creek, which is reasonably close to the center of this
+twenty-five-mile area, it seems quite natural that the major political,
+social, and economic developments would take place in close proximity&mdash;and
+they did.<a name="FNanchor_40_42" id="FNanchor_40_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_42" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span></p>
+<p>Thus, an area never exceeding two miles in width and spanning
+some ten miles (presently from Jersey Shore to Lock Haven) was
+the heartland of Fair Play settlement. Lycoming Creek, Larrys Creek,
+and Pine Creek all run south into the West Branch, having channeled
+breaks through the rolling valley which extends along the previously
+defined territory.</p>
+
+<p>"The land was ours before we were the land's," the poet said, and
+it seems apropos of this moment in history.<a name="FNanchor_41_43" id="FNanchor_41_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_43" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> Fair Play territory, possessed
+before it was owned and operated under <i>de facto</i> rule, would
+be some time in Americanizing the sturdy frontiersmen who came
+to bring civilization to this wilderness.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_3" id="Footnote_1_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_3"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Carl L. Becker, <i>Beginnings of the American People</i> (Ithaca, N. Y., 1960), p. 182.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_4" id="Footnote_2_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_4"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Turner, <i>Frontier and Section</i>, p. 51.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_5" id="Footnote_3_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_5"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Frederick Jackson Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i> (New York, 1963),
+p. 9.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_6" id="Footnote_4_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_6"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> E. B. O'Callaghan, <i>Documentary History of the State of New York</i> (Albany,
+1849), I, 587-591.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_7" id="Footnote_5_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_7"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Henry Steele Commager, <i>Documents of American History</i> (New York, 1958),
+I, 49.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_8" id="Footnote_6_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_8"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> An earlier twentieth-century historian misinterprets the first Stanwix Treaty in
+much the same manner as earlier colonial historians erred in their judgments of
+the Proclamation of 1763. Albert T. Volwiler, <i>George Croghan and the Westward
+Movement, 1741-1782</i> (Cleveland, 1926), p. 250, really overstates his case, if the Fair
+Play settlers are any example, when he claims that the Fort Stanwix line, by
+setting a definite boundary, impeded the western advance. Establishing friendships
+with the Indians and then persuading them to sell their lands proved valuable
+to more than speculators, whose case Volwiler documents so well, as West Branch
+settlements after 1768 will attest.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_9" id="Footnote_7_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_9"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> The extension of Provincial authority to Pine Creek would have taken in three-fourths
+of what we have labeled Fair Play territory.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_10" id="Footnote_8_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_10"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> John F. Meginness, <i>Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley of the
+Susquehanna</i> (Williamsport, 1889), p. 106. The full passage from the Bethlehem
+Diary (now in the Moravian Archives) was translated by the late Dr. William
+N. Schwarze for Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, historian of the Pennsylvania Historical
+and Museum Commission, as follows: "In the afternoon [June 8, New Style] our
+brethren left that place [beyond Montoursville] and came in the evening to the
+Limping Messenger on the Tiadachton Creek, where they spent the night." In the
+<i>Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography</i>, II (1878), 432 (hereafter cited
+as <i>PMHB</i>), Zeisberger's account is translated in this manner: "In the afternoon
+we proceeded on our journey, and at dusk came to the 'Limping Messenger,' or
+Diadachton Creek [a note identifies this as Lycoming], and encamped for the night."
+Here the error is in identifying the Limping Messenger with the stream. Meginness,
+of course, repeated the error in his <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 106. Referring the passage
+to Vernon H. Nelson of the Moravian Archives, through Dr. Wallace, resulted in
+a clarification of the translation and the affirmation of the "Limping Messenger"
+as a camp on the stream. In the Bethlehem Diary, under June 8, 1754, the sentence
+appears as follows: "des Nachm. reissten unsre Brr Wieder von da weg u kamen
+Abends zum hinckenden Boten an der Tiatachton Creek, u lagen da uber Nacht."
+In the original travel journal the passage reads: "des Nachm. reissten wir wieder
+von da weg, u kamen Abends zum <i>hinckenden Boten</i> an der Tiatachton Crick u
+lagen da uber Nacht." De Schweinitz in his <i>Zeisberger</i> further confused the issue
+in his description of the journey. He takes the adventurers (Zeisberger, Spangenburg,
+Conrad Weiser, Shickellamy, and Andrew Montour) through the valley of
+the Tiadaghton Creek on the Sheshequin Path to Onondaga (Syracuse). There
+was an Indian path up Pine Creek, but it led to Niagara, not Onondaga.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_11" id="Footnote_9_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_11"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 106. This is an added note of Meginness'
+commentary upon the citation noted above.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_12" id="Footnote_10_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_12"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> John Blair Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania</i> (Philadelphia,
+1883), p. 468. Linn also deals with the Tiadaghton question in his "Indian
+Land and Its Fair Play Settlers," <i>PMHB</i>, VII (1883), 420-425. Here he simply
+defines Fair Play territory as "Indian Land" encompassing the Lycoming-Pine
+Creek region.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_13" id="Footnote_11_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_13"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> <i>Minutes of the First Session of the Ninth General Assembly of the Commonwealth
+of Pennsylvania ...</i> (Philadelphia, 1784), Appendix, Proceedings of the
+Treaties held at Forts Stanwix and McIntosh, pp. 314-322.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_14" id="Footnote_12_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_14"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Oct. 23, p. 319.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_15" id="Footnote_13_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_15"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_16" id="Footnote_14_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_16"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Oct. 22, p. 316.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_17" id="Footnote_15_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_17"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> E. B. O'Callaghan, <i>Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of
+New York</i>, VIII (Albany, 1857), 125. In the discussions preceding the Fort Stanwix
+Treaty of 1768, the Indians' description of the boundary line could be interpreted
+as favoring Pine Creek: "... to the Head of the West Branch of Susquehanna
+thence down the same to Bald Eagle Creek thence across the River at Tiadaghta
+Creek below the great Island, thence by a straight Line to Burnett's Hills and along
+the same...." The juxtaposition of Bald Eagle Creek, the Great Island, and
+"Tiadaghta" Creek makes this conclusion plausible.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_18" id="Footnote_16_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_18"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> <i>See also ibid.</i>, Guy Johnson's map illustrating the treaty line, opposite p. 136.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_19" id="Footnote_17_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_19"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> D. S. Maynard, <i>Historical View of Clinton County, From Its Earliest Settlement
+To The Present Time</i> (Lock Haven, 1875), p. 8. The line is given by Maynard as
+follows: "... and took in the lands lying east of the North Branch of the Susquehanna,
+beginning at Owego, down to Towanda, thence up the same and across to
+the headwaters of Pine Creek; thence down the same to Kittanning...."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_20" id="Footnote_18_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_20"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," <i>Now and Then</i>, VIII
+(1947), 258-259.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_21" id="Footnote_19_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_21"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> Dr. Bertin, former associate secretary of the Pennsylvania State Education
+Association, adds nothing to the Meginness and Linn accounts, his probable
+sources. He speaks of settlements as early as 1772, whereas it is a matter of record
+that Cleary Campbell squatted in what is now north Lock Haven sometime shortly
+after 1769. He refers to the establishment of homes, properly, but then goes on to
+add churches and schools. The source for his "Children and elders met together
+periodically to recite catechism to the preacher, who was a travelling missionary,
+one being Phillip Fithian," was J. B. Linn. But Fithian, an extremely accurate
+diarist, fails to mention the occasion during his one-week visit to this area in the
+summer of 1775. However, the real value of this article is the editorial note by
+T. Kenneth Wood on the Tiadaghton question. In it he refers to John Bartram's
+journal of 1743, twenty-five years before the Stanwix Treaty at Rome, N. Y., with
+the Iroquois, which recounts his travels with the Oneida Chief Shickellamy and
+Conrad Weiser. Lewis Evans was also in the party, making notes for his map of
+1749. The party, on its way to Onondaga (Syracuse), was approaching Lycoming
+Creek at a point just south of Powys, via the Sheshequin Indian path. Bartram,
+the first American botanist, who wrote in his journal nightly after checking with
+his two guides, gives this account, T. Kenneth Wood (ed.), "Observations Made
+By John Bartram In His Travels from Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the
+Lake Ontario in 1743," <i>Now and Then</i>, V (1936), 90: "Then down a hill to a run
+and over a rich neck of land lying between it and the Tiadaughton." No contact
+was made with Pine Creek. Dr. Wood contends in his note to the Bertin article,
+and this writer is inclined to agree, that the Indian of 1743 and the Indian of 1768
+were telling the truth and that the white settlers of 1768, and for sixteen years
+thereafter, were wrong, either through guile and design or ignorance. He says,
+"The original Indian principals signing the treaty had retreated westward and
+sixteen years of fighting over the question (and possibly a few bribes) had settled
+it to the white man's satisfaction. The Indians always had to yield or get out."
+This is essentially the point which Dr. Wallace made to me in his letter of Feb.
+16, 1961.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_22" id="Footnote_20_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_22"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Elsie Singmaster, <i>Pennsylvania's Susquehanna</i> (Harrisburg, 1950), p. 87. Her
+Pine Creek description (while describing tributaries of the Susquehanna) speaks
+of the gorge as the upper course of Pine Creek, which is now part of Harrison State
+Park. Here, she says, "The rim is accessible by a paved highway, and from there
+one may look down a thousand feet and understand why the Indians called the
+stream Tiadaghton or Lost Creek."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_23" id="Footnote_21_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_23"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, <i>The Life and Times of David Zeisberger</i> (Philadelphia,
+1871), p. 133. Further evidence of DeSchweinitz' confusion is found in his
+Geographical Glossary in the same book. On page 707, he calls the Great Island,
+Lock Haven; on page 709, he calls Long Island, Jersey Shore; and on page 713,
+he refers to Pine Creek as the Tiadaghton, "also called Diadaghton."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_24" id="Footnote_22_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_24"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> The term "New Purchase" was frequently used, both officially and otherwise,
+to designate the area on the north side of the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island, although in actuality the purchase line
+terminated at Lycoming Creek.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_25" id="Footnote_23_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_25"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Charles Smith, <i>Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania</i> (Philadelphia,
+1810), II, 274.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_26" id="Footnote_24_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_26"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Paul A. W. Wallace, <i>Conrad Weiser, Friend of Colonist and Mohawk</i> (Philadelphia,
+1945), p. 81.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_27" id="Footnote_25_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_27"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Wallace mistakenly attaches the appellation "Limping Messenger" to "a foot-sore
+Indian named Anontagketa," <i>ibid.</i>, p. 220. However, this error was corrected
+in a letter to this writer, August 24, 1962.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_28" id="Footnote_26_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_28"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Wood (ed.), "Observations Made By John Bartram," p. 90.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_29" id="Footnote_27_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_29"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 79.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_30" id="Footnote_28_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_30"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 411.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_31" id="Footnote_29_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_31"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Robert Greenhalgh Albion and Leonidas Dodson (eds.), <i>Philip Vickers Fithian:
+Journal, 1775-1776</i> (Princeton, 1934), pp. 69-76.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_32" id="Footnote_30_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_32"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Hazel Shields Garrison, "Cartography of Pennsylvania before 1800," <i>PMHB</i>,
+LIX (1935), 255-283. Information on Adlum's maps was obtained from [T. Kenneth
+Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor, 1792, Found Among the
+Bingham Papers," <i>Now and Then</i>, X (July, 1952), 148-150.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_33" id="Footnote_31_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_33"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> [Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum," pp. 148-150.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_34" id="Footnote_32_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_34"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> Bureau of Land Records, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, New Purchase Applications,
+Nos. 1823 and 2611, April 3, 1769.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_35" id="Footnote_33_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_35"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, First Series, XI, 508.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_36" id="Footnote_34_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_36"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> <i>Colonial Records</i>, X, 95.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_37" id="Footnote_35_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_37"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> In a letter to this writer, May 19, 1962, Professor Marshall states: "It was my
+opinion that the treaty marked, in one aspect, a bargain between Johnson and
+the Six Nations. I do not accept Billington's charge of betrayal of their interests.
+But it does seem to me that this meant hard bargaining in New York, when the
+state of Indian and colonial lands was precisely known to both sides, and indifference
+and ignorance beyond this point.... As far as I am aware, there was no
+prolonged and close discussion about the running of the line in Pennsylvania in
+the least comparable to that which took place over its location in New York."
+<i>See</i> Peter Marshall, "Sir William Johnson and the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, 1768,"
+<i>The Journal of American Studies</i>, I (Oct., 1967), pp. 149-179.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_38" id="Footnote_36_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_38"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 340.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_39" id="Footnote_37_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_39"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Helen Herritt Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence,"
+<i>The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XXII
+(1958), 1-15.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_40" id="Footnote_38_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_40"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> The fame of this historic elm stems from the fact that it is reputed to be the
+site of a local declaration of independence made the same day as the adoption of
+Jefferson's draft in Philadelphia, July 4, 1776. The author is indebted to Donald
+H. Kent, Director of the Bureau of Archives and History, Pennsylvania Historical
+and Museum Commission, for the idea and some of the expression in this paragraph.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_41" id="Footnote_39_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_41"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Paul A. W. Wallace, <i>Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation</i> (New York, 1962) p. 3.
+This delightful book in the "Regions of America" series, edited by Carl Carmer,
+contains an excellent chapter on the significance of Pennsylvania's "Three Rivers."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_42" id="Footnote_40_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_42"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Gristmills&mdash;meeting places of the Fair Play tribunal&mdash;a school, and a church
+would all be found in this Pine Creek region. However, the church (Presbyterian)
+would not be built until the territory became an official part of the Commonwealth
+following the second Stanwix Treaty in 1784.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_43" id="Footnote_41_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_43"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> Robert Frost, <i>Complete Poems of Robert Frost</i> (New York, 1949), p. 467. This
+poem somehow characterizes the experiences of the settlers of this frontier and
+many frontiers to come.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_TWO" id="CHAPTER_TWO"></a><small>CHAPTER TWO</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>The Fair Play Settlers: Demographic Factors</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>James Logan, president of the Proprietary Council of Pennsylvania,
+1736-1738, once declared that "if the Scotch-Irish continue
+to come they will make themselves masters of the Province."<a name="FNanchor_1_44" id="FNanchor_1_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_44" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> His
+prediction, which was to be generally proven in the Province during
+the French and Indian War, was to be demonstrated particularly in the
+West Branch Valley during the Revolutionary period. The Scotch-Irish
+were the dominant national or ethnic group in the Fair Play
+territory from 1769 to 1784. This dominance is demonstrated in
+Chart 1, which indicates the national origins of eighty families in the
+Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<h4>Chart 1</h4>
+<p class="center">
+National Origins of Fair Play Settlers<a name="FNanchor_2_45" id="FNanchor_2_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_45" class="fnanchor">[2]</a><br />
+Expressed in Numbers and Percentages</p>
+
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width: 70%;">
+<tr><td class="tbtc">Total</td><td class="tbtc">Scotch-Irish</td><td class="tbtc">English</td><td class="tbtc">German</td><td class="tbtc">Scots</td><td class="tbtc">Irish</td><td class="tbtc">Welsh</td><td class="tbtc">French</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt2">80</td><td class="lt2">39</td><td class="lt2">16</td><td class="lt2">12</td><td class="lt2">5</td><td class="lt2">4</td><td class="lt2">2</td><td class="lt2">2</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt2">%</td><td class="lt2">48.75</td><td class="lt2">20</td><td class="lt2">15</td><td class="lt2">6.25</td><td class="lt2">5</td><td class="lt2">2.5</td><td class="lt2">2.5</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="tbb" colspan="8">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span></p>
+<p>Not only were the Scotch-Irish the most numerous national stock
+among the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley, but they
+also represented a plurality and almost a majority of the entire population.
+The significance of this finding in terms of the "style of
+life" of the Fair Play settlers cannot be over-emphasized. It influenced
+the politics, the religion, the family patterns, and thus the
+values of this frontier society.</p>
+
+<p>Several other important conclusions can be drawn from this chart.
+In contrast to the population of Pennsylvania in general and the
+assumptions regarding frontier areas in particular, the English, rather
+than the Germans, were the second most numerous national stock
+group. The Germans, however, made up the third-largest segment
+of the West Branch Valley population. The Scots, Welsh, Irish, and
+a few French inhabitants formed the remaining sixteen per cent of
+the population. Obviously, this was a dominantly Anglo-Saxon
+Protestant area of settlement.</p>
+
+<p>The impact of this Scotch-Irish hegemony upon the religion, politics,
+family life, and social values in general will be dealt with in a later
+chapter. However, it can be noted at this juncture that the strong-willed
+individualism which characterized these sturdy people was as much
+influenced by their national origin as by their experience on
+the American frontier. Furthermore, Presbyterianism influenced and
+was influenced by a developing democratic political system, which
+paralleled the American Presbyterian system of popular rather than
+hierarchical church government.<a name="FNanchor_3_46" id="FNanchor_3_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_46" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> A prominent immigration historian
+has pointed out that "the theory of Presbyterian republicanism, as
+a matter of church policy, could easily be reconciled with demands
+of the more radical democrats of 1776."<a name="FNanchor_4_47" id="FNanchor_4_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_47" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> Finally, the social life and
+customs and, hence, the values of this frontier society were governed
+for the most part by this majority group. Thus, dogmatic faith,
+political equality, social and economic independence, respect for
+education, and a tightly-knit pattern of family relationships express<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span>
+appropriately the institutional patterns by which the Scotch-Irish of
+the West Branch operated.</p>
+
+<p>It is interesting to contrast the national stock groupings of this
+Susquehanna frontier with the results of a study of national origins
+of the American population made by the American Council of Learned
+Societies and published in 1932:<a name="FNanchor_5_48" id="FNanchor_5_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_48" class="fnanchor">[5]</a></p>
+
+
+<h4>Chart 2</h4>
+
+<p class="center">Classification of the White Population into Its National Stocks<br />
+in the Continental United States and Pennsylvania: 1790; and<br />
+in the Fair Play Territory: 1784 (Expressed in Percentages).</p>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width: 80%;">
+<tr><td class="tbtc">&nbsp;</td><td class="tbtc">Scotch-Irish</td><td class="tbtc">English</td><td class="tbtc">German</td><td class="tbtc">Scots</td><td class="tbtc">Irish</td><td class="tbtc">Welsh</td><td class="tbtc">French</td><td class="tbtc">Other</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Continental United States</td><td align='center'>5.9</td><td align='center'>60.1</td><td align='center'>8.6</td><td align='center'>8.1</td><td align='center'>3.6</td><td align='center'>0</td><td align='center'>2.3</td><td align='center'>10.6</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Pennsylvania</td><td align='center'>11.0</td><td align='center'>35.3</td><td align='center'>33.3</td><td align='center'>8.6</td><td align='center'>3.5</td><td align='center'>0</td><td align='center'>1.8</td><td align='center'>6.5</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Fair Play Territory</td><td align='center'>48.75</td><td align='center'>20</td><td align='center'>15</td><td align='center'>6.25</td><td align='center'>5</td><td align='center'>2.5</td><td align='center'>2.5</td><td align='center'>0</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="tbb" colspan="9">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<p>From this comparison it can readily be seen that the national origins
+of the Fair Play settlers in no way conform to either the national pattern
+or the State pattern of just a few years later. Although this limited
+frontier area can be recognized as having its own individual ratio
+of component stocks, it is representative rather than unique in its
+culture and values. The reaction of those of other national stocks
+to the frontier experience buttresses the conclusion that their values
+were influenced more by the frontier than by national origin. It is
+this common reaction to the problems of the frontier which gives<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span>
+rise to the conclusion that this West Branch Valley environment was
+characterized by and that its inhabitants held values which Turner
+evaluated as democratic. The nature of those democratic values is,
+however, dealt with in greater detail in subsequent chapters.</p>
+
+<p>The American sources of emigration form the next question to be
+considered in examining the origins of the Fair Play settlers. Lacking
+adequate statistical data for a complete picture of migration in terms
+of percentages, the following chart indicates only the probable origins
+of the three most numerous national stock groupings in the Fair
+Play territory:</p>
+
+<h4>Chart 3</h4>
+
+<p class="center">American Sources of Emigration<a name="FNanchor_6_49" id="FNanchor_6_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_49" class="fnanchor">[6]</a></p>
+
+
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width:60%;">
+<tr><td class="tbtc">National<br />&nbsp;Stock</td><td class="tbtc">Percentage of<br />&nbsp;Population</td><td class="tbtl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;American Source of Emigration</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Scotch-Irish</td><td class="lt3">48.75</td><td class="lt">Chester, Cumberland, Dauphin,<br />Lancaster counties</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">English</td><td class="lt3">20</td><td class="lt">New Jersey, New York, southeastern<br />Pennsylvania (Philadelphia and Bucks counties)</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">German</td><td class="lt3">15</td><td class="lt">Chester, Lancaster, Philadelphia, and<br />York counties</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Total</td><td class="lt3">83.75</td><td class="lt">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="tbb" colspan="3">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+
+<p>Obviously, the primary sources for the West Branch settlements
+were the lower Susquehanna Valley and southeastern Pennsylvania.
+However, an appreciable number of English settlers appear to have
+come originally from New Jersey to settle in what they called "Jersey
+Shore," immediately east of the mouth of Pine Creek. One explanation
+for the migration of the dominant stock, the Scotch-Irish,
+is probably the fact that the Provincial government refused to sell
+more lands in Lancaster and York counties to the Scotch-Irish. In
+effect, they were driven to use squatter tactics in the Fair Play territory.<a name="FNanchor_7_50" id="FNanchor_7_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_50" class="fnanchor">[7]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span></p>
+<p>The internal origins of sixteen of these settlers can be verified in
+either Meginness or Linn. Four came from Chester County, three each
+from the Juniata Valley and Lancaster County, two each from Cumberland
+County and New Jersey, and one each from Dauphin County
+and from Orange County in New York. Nine of these settlers, incidentally,
+were Scotch-Irish. Although these data are insufficient for
+any valid generalization, they do conform to the characteristic migratory
+trends indicated in Chart 3.</p>
+
+<p>In analyzing the migration of settlers into the West Branch Valley
+beyond the line of the "New Purchase," it becomes apparent that the
+Scotch-Irish came from the fringe areas of settlement, whereas the
+English and Germans tended to migrate from more settled areas. Furthermore,
+the English migrants often came from outside the Province
+of Pennsylvania, either from New Jersey or New York. In fact, if one
+were to construct a pattern of concentric zones, with the core in the
+southeastern corner of the Province and the lines radiating in a north-westerly
+direction, the English would be found at the core, the
+Germans in the next zone, and the Scotch-Irish in the outlying area.
+This zoning offers no real contradiction of the usual pattern of Pennsylvania
+migrations. However, when one combines the data of internal
+movements with those of external origins, certain contradictions do
+appear. The most noteworthy of these is, of course, the prominence
+of English settlers on this Fair Play frontier vis-&agrave;-vis the Germans.</p>
+
+<p>Since the Pennsylvania frontiersmen of the Wyoming Valley were
+of English stock, and immigrated from New England, it might have
+been assumed that some of these Connecticut settlers came into the
+West Branch Valley. Here, however, all evidence points to the fact
+that Connecticut settlers did not migrate west of Muncy, which is
+located at the juncture of Muncy Creek and the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River (where the bend in the river turns into a directly
+western pattern). Thus the Connecticut boundary dispute of 1769-1775,
+which erupted into the Pennamite Wars, did not involve the
+Fair Play settlers.<a name="FNanchor_8_51" id="FNanchor_8_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_51" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> Nevertheless, at least one Fair Play settler looked<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span>
+forward to the possibility of an advance of the Connecticut settlement
+along the West Branch.<a name="FNanchor_9_52" id="FNanchor_9_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_52" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>The impact of events upon the settlement of the Fair Play territory
+is particularly apparent when one examines the periods of
+immigration to and emigration from the region. Three events seemed
+to have had the greatest influence upon the immigration: the Treaty of
+Fort Stanwix in 1768, which extended the Provincial limits to Lycoming
+Creek in this region, and the resultant opening of the Land Office
+for claims in the "New Purchase" on April 3, 1769;<a name="FNanchor_10_53" id="FNanchor_10_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_53" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> the almost complete
+evacuation of the territory in the "Great Runaway" of the summer
+of 1778, which was prompted by Indian attacks and the fear of a
+great massacre comparable to the "Wyoming Valley Massacre" of that
+same year;<a name="FNanchor_11_54" id="FNanchor_11_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_54" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> and finally, the Stanwix Treaty of 1784, which brought the
+Fair Play area within the limits of the Province.<a name="FNanchor_12_55" id="FNanchor_12_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_55" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p>
+
+<p>The first Stanwix Treaty, made by Sir William Johnson with the
+Six Nations in November of 1768, extended the legitimate line of
+English colonial settlement from the line established by the Proclamation
+of 1763 to a point on the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+River at the mouth of Lycoming Creek (the Tiadaghton, as it was
+so ambiguously labeled).<a name="FNanchor_13_56" id="FNanchor_13_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_56" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> This extension, ostensibly for the purpose
+of providing lands for the colonial veterans of the French and Indian
+War, became a boon to speculators and an inducement to the Scotch-Irish
+squatters who took lands beyond the limits of this "New Purchase"
+in what was to become the Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>In the summer of 1778 the war whoop once again caused the settlers
+of the West Branch Valley to flee from their homes for fear of
+a repetition of the Wyoming Massacre. The peril of the moment is
+vividly described in this communication to the Executive Council in
+Philadelphia from Colonel Samuel Hunter, commander of Fort Augusta:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>The Carnage at Wioming, the devastations and murders upon
+the West branch of Susquehanna, On Bald Eagle Creek, and
+in short throughout the whole County to within a few
+miles of these Towns (the recital of which must be shocking)
+I suppose must have before now have reached your
+ears, if not you may figure yourselves men, women, and
+children, Butchered and scalped, many of them after being
+promised quarters, and some scalped alive, of which we have
+miserable Instances amongst us.... I have only to add that
+A few Hundreds of men well armed and immediately sent
+to our relief would prevent much bloodshed, confusion and
+devastation ... as the appearance of being supported would
+call back many of our fugitives to save their Harvest for their
+subsistence, rather than suffer the inconveniences which reason
+tells me they do down the Country and their with their
+families return must ease the people below of a heavy and
+unprofitable Burthen.<a name="FNanchor_14_57" id="FNanchor_14_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_57" class="fnanchor">[14]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Robert Covenhoven, who lived at the mouth of the Loyalsock Creek
+and who fled to Sunbury (Fort Augusta) also, described the flight:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Such a sight I never saw in my life. Boats, canoes, hog-troughs,
+rafts hastily made of dry sticks, every sort of floating
+article, had been put in requisition, and were crowded
+with women, children, and plunder. There were several
+hundred people in all.... The whole convoy arrived safely
+at Sunbury, leaving the entire range of farms along the West
+Branch to the ravages of the Indians.<a name="FNanchor_15_58" id="FNanchor_15_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_58" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>In this eighteenth-century Dunkirk, the West Branch Valley was
+practically cleared of settlers.</p>
+
+<p>The Indians, it is true, proved troublesome to the entire advancing
+American frontier; but unlike the French, whose menacing forts had
+been removed in the recent wars, the Indians were unable to halt the
+westward penetration. An expedition under the leadership of Colonel
+Thomas Hartley was sent out expressly for the purpose of boosting
+morale in the West Branch Valley following the Wyoming Massacre
+and the Great Runaway. Colonel Hartley's letter to Thomas McKean,
+chief justice of Pennsylvania and a member of the Continental Congress,
+gives bitter testimony to the conditions which he observed in
+September of 1778:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>You heard of the Distresses of these Frontiers they are
+truly great&mdash;The People which we found were Difident and
+timid The Panick had not yet left them&mdash;many a wealthy
+Family reduced to Poverty &amp; without a home, some had
+lost their Husbands their children or Friends&mdash;all was
+gloomy.... the Barbarians do now and then attack an unarmed
+man a Helpless Mother or Infant....</p></div>
+
+<p>The colonel indicated, however, that strong militia support and
+some offensive action would restore confidence and cause the people
+to return to the valley. His interpretation of the significance of his
+mission is quite clearly stated in the conclusion of his letter: "We
+shall not have it in our Power to gain Honour or Laurels on these
+Frontiers but we have the Satisfaction to think we save our Country...."
+Hartley's solution to the Indian problem, which had driven
+off the settlers, was to expel them "beyond the Lakes" excepting only
+the more civilized Tuscaroras and Oneidas.<a name="FNanchor_16_59" id="FNanchor_16_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_59" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p>
+
+<p>Despite the danger from the Indians, the Fair Play settlers began
+trickling back to their homes, or what was left of them, toward the
+end of the Revolutionary War. Once the war was ended and the Fair
+Play territory was annexed by subsequent purchase, the mass movement
+of settlers to the West Branch Valley resumed.</p>
+
+<p>Incidentally, Dr. Wallace in his <i>Conrad Weiser</i> assesses one John
+Henry Lydius with the major responsibility for the Indian massacres
+in central and northeastern Pennsylvania. Wallace notes that Lydius'
+Connecticut purchase from the Indians in 1754 caused "war between
+Pennsylvania and Connecticut and ... [precipitated] the Massacre of
+Wyoming in 1778." This massacre, as West Branch historians know,
+had its subsequent impact on the West Branch Valley in the Great
+Runaway, although the Winters Massacre of June 10, 1778, which
+prompted the evacuation of the valley, actually preceded the Wyoming
+affair.<a name="FNanchor_17_60" id="FNanchor_17_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_60" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span></p>
+<p>Finally, the purchase of the remaining Indian lands in Pennsylvania
+(except for the small corner of the Erie Triangle) was made on
+October 3, 1784, in a second Stanwix Treaty. This accession ended the
+Pennsylvania boundary dispute with the Six Nations; and it also
+ended the need for any extra-legal system of government in the West
+Branch Valley, for this new treaty encompassed the Fair Play territory.<a name="FNanchor_18_61" id="FNanchor_18_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_61" class="fnanchor">[18]</a>
+However, this treaty raised the troublesome Tiadaghton question
+once again, a question only partly resolved by the Legislature's
+designation of Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton and the recognition
+of the squatters' right of pre-emption to their settlements along
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna.<a name="FNanchor_19_62" id="FNanchor_19_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_62" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> The land office was opened
+for the sale of this purchase July 1, 1785; by 1786 fifty heads of families
+were listed for State taxes in Northumberland County.<a name="FNanchor_20_63" id="FNanchor_20_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_63" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> Approximately
+fifty per cent of these taxables had been in the area earlier.</p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the only significant nationality trend to be noted in this
+important sequence of events is the tenacity of the Scotch-Irish and
+the subsequent increase of English and German settlers following
+this last "New Purchase."<a name="FNanchor_21_64" id="FNanchor_21_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_64" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> Over half of the taxables in Pine Creek
+Township, the new designation for much of the Fair Play territory
+after it became an official part of the Province, were Scotch-Irish. As
+a result, these Scots from the north of Ireland continued to maintain
+their position of leadership even after the area was included in the
+Commonwealth.</p>
+
+<p>The reasons for migrating to the West Branch Valley in this fifteen-year
+period from 1769 to 1784 were varied and numerous. For the
+most part, the various nationality groups which emigrated from
+Europe came for economic opportunity and because of religious and
+political persecutions. Their movement to the frontier regions was
+prompted by similar problems. In fact, much the same as the earlier
+settlers of Jamestown and Plymouth, the squatters of the West Branch
+Valley came for gain and for God. Furthermore, the promise of
+Penn's "Holy Experiment," in which men of diverse backgrounds could<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span>
+live together peacefully in religious freedom and political equality,
+encouraged them to come to Pennsylvania. However, once the dominant
+group of the Fair Play frontier, the Scotch-Irish, arrived in Pennsylvania,
+they found themselves unsuited to the settled areas. The
+natural enemy of the English, who had oppressed them at home, these
+settlers soon found themselves repeating the Old World conflicts. In
+addition, the German Pietists caused them further embarrassment in
+their new homes. Their Calvinism, fierce political independence, and
+earnest desire for land and opportunity soon made them <i>personae
+non gratae</i> in the established areas. Hence, they migrated to the frontier
+areas and even beyond the limits of Provincial interference and
+control.<a name="FNanchor_22_65" id="FNanchor_22_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_65" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p>
+
+<p>The paucity of population data makes impossible any extensive
+analysis of the stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers. However,
+the tax lists, both in the published archives and in the files of
+the county commissioners in Northumberland County, offer limited
+evidence for the early years, though they provide ample data for the
+years after 1773. Prior to the Great Runaway in 1778, tax lists are
+available for the entire county of Northumberland; the lists simply
+indicate the taxable's township, acreage, and tax. Records in the
+Northumberland County courthouse give the assessments for 1773,
+1774, 1776, and 1778.</p>
+
+<p>Due to the fact that the Fair Play territory was outside the Provincial
+limits until after the purchase of Fort Stanwix in 1784, the
+assessment lists give only those persons residing within Northumberland
+County. As a result, there were only six to twelve settlers who
+associated with the Fair Play men who were included in the lists for
+1773-1778. Chart 4 indicates the names, national origins, and years
+listed for those settlers.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span></p>
+
+
+<h4>Chart 4</h4>
+
+<p class="center">Fair Play Settlers on the Tax Rolls 1773-1778.<a name="FNanchor_23_66" id="FNanchor_23_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_66" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width:70%;">
+
+<tr><td class="tbtl">Name</td><td class="tbtl">National Origin</td><td class="tbtc">1773</td><td class="tbtc">1774</td><td class="tbtc">1776</td><td class="tbtc">1778</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">James Alexander</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">George Calhoune</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">Cleary Campbell</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">William Campbell, Jr.</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">William Campbell, Jr.</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">John Clark</td>
+<td class="lt2">English</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">Thomas Forster</td>
+<td class="lt2">English</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">James Irwin</td>
+<td class="lt2">Scotch-Irish</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">John Jamison</td>
+<td class="lt2">English</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">Isaiah Jones</td>
+<td class="lt2">Welsh</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">Robert King</td>
+<td class="lt2">German</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">John Price</td>
+<td class="lt2">Welsh</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">x</td>
+<td class="center">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="lt">Totals</td>
+<td class="lt2">&nbsp;</td>
+<td class="tbb">6</td>
+<td class="tbb">8</td>
+<td class="tbb">7</td>
+<td class="tbb">7</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td class="tbb" colspan="6">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<p>From these limited data one obviously concludes that the Scotch-Irish
+were not only the most numerous but also the most persistent
+of these frontiersmen. Also, nine of these men, that is all except
+Clark, Jones, and King, appear on the tax lists for Northumberland
+County for the year 1785.<a name="FNanchor_24_67" id="FNanchor_24_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_67" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> Interestingly enough, six of these nine
+were Scotch-Irish; and although our sample is limited, it is readily
+apparent that the stalwart Scots had a way of "hanging on." It would
+be presumptuous to conclude that seventy-five per cent of the residents
+before 1778 returned by 1785; but it is fact that some forty
+families had made improvements in the area by 1773 when William
+Cooke was sent out by the Land Office to "Warn the People of[f] the
+unpurchased Land."<a name="FNanchor_25_68" id="FNanchor_25_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_68" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> Furthermore, as indicated earlier, some fifty
+families appear on the assessments for 1786, more than half of whom
+had been in the region before.</p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span></p><p>Any effort to analyze the population in terms of stability and mobility
+runs head-on into the creation of new townships in the 1780's,
+the inability to establish death rates for this frontier, and the inadequacy
+of probate records. The result is that the data are intuitively
+rather than statistically sound. Chart 5 offers a comparison of tax
+lists over a period of nine years as the basis for some conclusions regarding
+the stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers.</p>
+
+
+<h4>Chart 5</h4>
+
+<p class="center">Population Stability and Mobility<br />
+Based Upon a Comparison of Tax Lists<br />
+For the Period From 1778 to 1787.<a name="FNanchor_26_69" id="FNanchor_26_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_69" class="fnanchor">[26]</a></p>
+
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="" style="width:70%;">
+<tr><td class="tbtc">&nbsp;</td><td class="tbtc">1778-80</td><td class="tbtc">1781</td><td class="tbtc">1783-84</td><td class="tbtc">1786</td><td class="tbtc">1787</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Number of residents assessed</td><td align='center'>27</td><td align='center'>29</td><td align='center'>34</td><td align='center'>40</td><td align='center'>68</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="lt">Number appearing on previous assessments</td><td align='center'>6</td><td align='center'>19</td><td align='center'>21</td><td align='center'>14</td><td align='center'>33</td></tr>
+<tr><td class="tbb" colspan="6">&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<p>Except for the 1783-84 figures, all of the tax data are for State taxes.
+The exception is the listing for the federal supply tax in 1783-84.
+The steady growth rate of the area is easily recognizable both in raw
+figures and in percentages. Beginning with an increase of a little more
+than seven per cent between the first two listings, we find a seventy
+per cent increase in the final figures. The tremendous increase in the
+last two assessments may be due to the purchase of 1784 and the subsequent
+legitimizing of claims through the establishment of pre-emption
+rights.</p>
+
+<p>The stability of the population is particularly noted in the consistently
+high percentage of residents with some tenure in the valley.
+Furthermore, the apparent contradiction of this statement by the
+decline to fourteen residents in the 1786 listing who had once left
+and then returned is offset when one examines the neighboring township
+assessments for that same year. Here fourteen additional names
+of former Fair Play settlers are to be found which would sustain the
+characteristic pattern of tenure. The statistical problem is complicated
+by the creation of new townships following the purchase of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span>
+1784. Pine Creek and Lycoming were the new designations for the
+former Fair Play territory, Pine Creek running from the creek of
+that same name west, and Lycoming extending from Pine Creek east
+to Lycoming Creek.</p>
+
+<p>Petitions from the area in 1778, 1781, and 1784 give a similar
+picture. Almost half of the names which are found on the tax lists
+appear on two or more of these appeals. These include a distress
+petition in June of 1778, and petitions asking recognition of pre-emption
+rights in 1781 and 1784.<a name="FNanchor_27_70" id="FNanchor_27_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_70" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> The signatures on the petitions
+range in number from thirty-nine to fifty-one, and at least twenty-four
+of these settlers signed two or more of these documents. The very
+nature of these petitions, particularly the later ones, indicates the
+tremendous desire on the part of these sturdy pioneers to remain
+in or return to their homes in the West Branch Valley. Here too,
+however, this tenacity of purpose is not strictly confined to the
+Scotch-Irish.</p>
+
+<p>What conclusions can be drawn from this analysis of the demographic
+factors in the Fair Play settlement? Particularly evident is
+the dominance of the Scotch-Irish, who numerically composed the
+greatest national stock group in the population. This dominance, as
+we have already noted, greatly influenced the political and social
+institutions of the area. Secondly, one might consider the numbers
+of English settlers, as compared with the number of Germans, surprising.
+As a matter of fact, if one adds the numbers of Scots and
+Welsh inhabitants to the English and Scotch-Irish, the result is an
+"English" percentage of seventy-seven and one half for the entire
+population. Thus it is quite logical to assume that English customs
+and language would prevail, and they did. Incidentally, it should be
+added that the "English" nature of the population, combined with
+the Scotch-Irish plurality, meant that the Scotch-Irish were more representative
+of this frontier than they were innovators of its customs
+and values.</p>
+
+<p>If a majority of the Fair Play settlers came from the British Isles,
+from where did they emigrate in America? Here it is quite clear that
+these frontiersmen were predominantly from the lower Susquehanna
+Valley and southeastern Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania was to them a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span>
+land of liberty and opportunity;<a name="FNanchor_28_71" id="FNanchor_28_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_71" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> and when they failed to find these
+privileges in the settled areas, they moved out on the frontier where
+they could make their own rules, that is to say, establish their own
+familiar institutions. The result was the Fair Play system.</p>
+
+<p>Although the Fair Play settlers came to America and central Pennsylvania
+for the usual political, economic, and social reasons, the two
+Stanwix treaties and the Indian raids of 1778 had the most influence
+on population fluctuations. The pioneers came into the territory
+over-reaching the limits of the "New Purchase" of 1768. They were
+driven out, almost to a man, in the Great Runaway of 1778. And
+finally, they returned after the second "New Purchase" in 1784, which
+resulted in the recognition of their pre-emption claims for their
+earlier illegal settlements. It is interesting to note that pre-emption
+claims were recognized in the West Branch Valley some forty-five years
+prior to federal legislation to that effect.<a name="FNanchor_29_72" id="FNanchor_29_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_72" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p>
+
+<p>Despite fluctuations in the population, the Scotch-Irish were able
+to maintain their hold over the valley and thus influence the pattern
+of development for this frontier outpost. Horace Walpole, addressing
+the English Parliament during the American Revolution, said, "There
+is no use crying about it. Cousin America has run off with a Presbyterian
+parson, and that is the end of it."<a name="FNanchor_30_73" id="FNanchor_30_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_73" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> The Scotch-Irish with
+their Presbyterianism had run off with the West Branch Valley as
+well; and their independent spirit would see them in the foreground
+of the "noblest rupture in the history of mankind." That independent
+spirit and leadership is particularly noted in the political system
+which they established along the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+River. Their "Fair Play system" is the primary concern of the next
+chapter.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_44" id="Footnote_1_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_44"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> E. Melvin Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," <i>Americana</i>, XVII
+(1923), 382.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_45" id="Footnote_2_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_45"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> This chart was compiled by making a list of eighty names appearing in an
+article on the genealogy of the Fair Play men, Helen Herritt Russell, "The Documented
+Story of the Fair Play Men and Their Government," <i>The Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XII (1958), 16-43. Mrs.
+Russell is genealogist of the Fort Antes chapter of the Daughters of the American
+Revolution in Jersey Shore, Pa. The names were checked in Meginness and Linn
+for possible national origin. Approximately one-fourth were verified in these
+sources. Although this writer questioned the validity of the geographic conclusions
+of Meginness and Linn, both have ample documentation for their findings regarding
+genealogy and national origins. These findings can be validated in the published
+archives. The entire sample of names was submitted to Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, a
+folklore specialist and professor of English at the Pennsylvania State University,
+whose determination was made on the basis of linguistic techniques.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_46" id="Footnote_3_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_46"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Popular control was an American rather than a Scottish influence necessitated
+by the absence of sufficient numbers of ministers. In Scotland, the minister chose
+his elders and thus dominated the session; in America, the selection was made by
+the congregation. <i>See</i> James G. Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish: A Social History</i> (Chapel
+Hill, 1962), p. 150.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_47" id="Footnote_4_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_47"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Carl Wittke, <i>We Who Built America</i> (Cleveland, 1963), p. 57.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_48" id="Footnote_5_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_48"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> American Council of Learned Societies, "Report of Committee on Linguistic
+and National Stocks in the Population of the United States," <i>Annual Report of
+the American Historical Association for the Year 1931</i> (Washington, 1932), I, 124.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_49" id="Footnote_6_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_49"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> This summary has been prepared from three main sources: Wayland F. Dunaway,
+<i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i> (Hamden, Conn., 1962), pp. 89-91;
+Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), pp. 161-167; and John B. Linn, <i>History of Centre
+and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania</i> (Philadelphia, 1883), pp. 447, 481-482.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_50" id="Footnote_7_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_50"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_51" id="Footnote_8_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_51"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Wayland F. Dunaway, <i>A History of Pennsylvania</i> (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.,
+1948), pp. 131-137. According to John Bacon Deans, "The Migration of the
+Connecticut Yankees to the West Branch of the Susquehanna River," <i>The Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XX (1954), 34-35,
+eighty-two Yankees came to Warrior's Run in September of 1775, but none went
+farther west.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_52" id="Footnote_9_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_52"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., The Zebulon
+Butler Papers, Jonas Davis to Zebulon Butler, March 16, 1773.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_53" id="Footnote_10_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_53"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 340.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_54" id="Footnote_11_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_54"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 475; Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i>
+(1889), pp. 508-511.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_55" id="Footnote_12_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_55"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 477; Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i>
+(1889), p. 666.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_56" id="Footnote_13_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_56"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> O'Callaghan, <i>Documentary History of the State of New York</i>, I, 587-591.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_57" id="Footnote_14_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_57"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 509. This July 12, 1778, communication from
+Colonel Hunter did not fall on deaf ears, for Colonel Thomas Hartley was ordered
+to the area with his regiment before the summer was out.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_58" id="Footnote_15_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_58"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 475.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_59" id="Footnote_16_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_59"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Richmond D. Williams, "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778," <i>Now and
+Then</i>, XII (1960), 258-259.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_60" id="Footnote_17_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_60"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Wallace, <i>Conrad Weiser</i>, pp. 362-363. Lydius had gotten the Indians drunk
+following the settlement at Albany between the Six Nations and the Proprietaries.
+This boundary line (Albany) "crossed the West Branch below the Big Island,"
+p. 374.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_61" id="Footnote_18_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_61"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, First Series, XI, 508.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_62" id="Footnote_19_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_62"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 667.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_63" id="Footnote_20_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_63"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 477. <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>,
+Third Series, XIX, 711-713.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_64" id="Footnote_21_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_64"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> The ambiguity of the term "New Purchase" becomes apparent once it is recognized
+that territorial acquisitions of both Stanwix treaties adopted that appellation.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_65" id="Footnote_22_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_65"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 28-49.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_66" id="Footnote_23_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_66"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Northumberland County Courthouse, Sunbury, Pa., Penns &amp; C. 1782-1811 Tax
+Assessments, Cabinet #1. This book, found in the cellar of the courthouse, also
+contains the Pine Creek assessment for 1789.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_67" id="Footnote_24_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_67"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 618-622.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_68" id="Footnote_25_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_68"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, First Series, XII, 286-287. The squatters, apparently
+warned in advance, had practically all vacated the premises. However, neighbors
+across the river willingly gave their names.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_69" id="Footnote_26_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_69"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 437, 468, 557, 711, 790.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_70" id="Footnote_27_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_70"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III (1875), 217, 518-522. The original
+petitions of 1781 and 1784 are located in the State Archives, Harrisburg.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_71" id="Footnote_28_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_71"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Penn's colony was well advertised, and the emphasis upon liberty of conscience,
+when contrasted with the restrictions of the Test Act, gives ample support for the
+significance of liberty as a motivating factor. However, economic causes predominated.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_72" id="Footnote_29_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_72"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Ray Allen Billington, <i>Westward Expansion</i> (New York, 1960), p. 380. Billington
+refers here to the distribution-pre-emption measure of 1841, whereas Congress
+actually recognized squatters' rights in the act of 1830.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_73" id="Footnote_30_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_73"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_THREE" id="CHAPTER_THREE"></a><small>CHAPTER THREE</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>The Politics of Fair Play</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>The political system of these predominantly Scotch-Irish
+squatters in the Susquehanna Valley, along the West Branch,
+offers a vivid demonstration of the impact of the frontier on
+the development of democratic institutions. Occupying lands beyond
+the reach of the Provincial legislature, with some forty families of
+mixed national origin in residence by 1773, these frontier "outlaws"
+had to devise some solution to the question of authority in their
+territory.<a name="FNanchor_1_74" id="FNanchor_1_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_74" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> Their solution was the extra-legal creation of <i>de facto</i>
+rule historically known as the Fair Play system. The following is
+a contemporary description of that system:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>There existed a great number of locations of the third of
+April, 1769, for the choicest lands on the West Branch of Susquehanna,
+between the mouths of <i>Lycoming</i> and <i>Pine creeks</i>;
+but the proprietaries, from extreme caution, the result of that
+experience, which had also produced the very penal laws of
+1768, and 1769, and the proclamation already stated, had
+prohibited any surveys being made beyond the <i>Lycoming</i>.
+In the mean time, in violation of all law, a set of hardy adventurers,
+had from time to time, seated themselves on this
+doubtful territory. They made improvements, and formed
+a very considerable population. It is true, so far as regarded
+the rights to real property, they were not under the protection
+of the laws of the country; and were we to adopt the
+visionary theories of some philosophers, who have drawn
+their arguments from a supposed state of nature, we might
+be led to believe that the state of these people would have
+been a state of continual warfare; and that in contests for
+property the weakest must give way to the strongest. To<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span>
+prevent the consequences, real or supposed, of this state of
+things, they formed a mutual compact among themselves.
+They annually elected a tribunal, in rotation, of three of
+their settlers, whom they called <i>fair play men</i>, who were to
+decide all controversies, and settle disputed boundaries.
+From their decision there was no appeal. There could be
+no resistance. The decree was enforced by the whole body,
+who started up in mass, at the mandate of the court, and
+execution and eviction was as sudden, and irresistible as the
+judgment. Every new comer was obliged to apply to this
+powerful tribunal, and upon his solemn engagement to
+submit in all respects, <i>to the law of the land</i>, he was permitted
+to take possession of some vacant spot. Their decrees
+were, however, just; and when their settlements were recognized
+by law, and <i>fair play</i> had ceased, their decisions were
+received in evidence, and confirmed by judgments of courts.<a name="FNanchor_2_75" id="FNanchor_2_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_75" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>The idea of authority from the people was nothing new; in fact,
+it is as old as the Greeks. Nor is the concept of a "social compact,"
+here implied, particularly novel to the American scene. The theory
+was that people hitherto unconnected assembled and gave their consent
+to be governed by a certain ruler or rulers under some particular
+form of government.<a name="FNanchor_3_76" id="FNanchor_3_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_76" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Theoretically justified by John Locke in his
+persuasive defense of the Glorious Revolution, it had been practiced
+in Plymouth, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire,
+where practical necessity had required it for settlements occasionally
+made outside charter limits. The frontier, whether in New England
+or in the West Branch Valley, created a practical necessity which
+made popular consent the basis of an actual government.</p>
+
+<p>They were not "covenanters" in the Congregational sense of having
+brought an established church with them to the Fair Play territory.
+But the Fair Play settlers understood and subscribed to the
+principle of popular control, which was fundamental to such solemnly
+made and properly ratified agreements. Separated from the authority
+of the crown, detached from the authority of the hierarchy of the
+church by the Protestant Reformation, possessing no American tradition<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span>
+of extensive political experience, these settlers could only depend
+upon themselves as proper authorities for their own political system.</p>
+
+<p>Furthermore, the great majority of the settlers who came to the
+Fair Play territory came from families who had left their homes in
+the old country to escape political, economic, and social restrictions,
+only to be made unwelcome in their new homes in the settled areas
+of Pennsylvania. Displaced persons in a new country, they were
+forced by lives of conflict to seek better opportunity by moving to
+undeveloped lands. As a result, they settled along the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna, beyond the authority of the crown and outside
+the pressures of the Provincial legislature.</p>
+
+<p>If man is a predatory beast in his natural state, a belief some
+expressed in the eighteenth century, then it follows naturally that
+every society must have some agency of authority and control. The
+universally standardized solution to the problem of social control
+is government. The Fair Play system was the answer on this Susquehanna
+frontier to the need for some legitimate agency of force.<a name="FNanchor_4_77" id="FNanchor_4_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_77" class="fnanchor">[4]</a>
+This system vested authority in the people through annual elections
+of a tribunal of three of their number. The members of the tribunal
+were given quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial powers over all
+the settlers in the West Branch Valley "beyond the purchase line."<a name="FNanchor_5_78" id="FNanchor_5_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_78" class="fnanchor">[5]</a></p>
+
+<p>Although no record of any of these elections has been preserved,
+the composition of the Fair Play tribunal in 1776 has been established
+and verified by subsequent reviews of land claims in the county<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span>
+courts.<a name="FNanchor_6_79" id="FNanchor_6_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_79" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> Also, two of the members of the tribunal of 1775 are identified
+in a pre-emption claim made before the Lycoming County Court
+in 1797.<a name="FNanchor_7_80" id="FNanchor_7_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_80" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> It is interesting to note that among these five men are
+represented the three most prominent national stock groups in the
+area, with the Scotch-Irish, as our earlier sample demonstrated, in
+the majority.</p>
+
+<p>Lacking returns of the annual elections of the tribunal and minutes
+of its actual meetings, we have only Smith's <i>Laws of the Commonwealth
+of Pennsylvania</i>, petitions from the Fair Play settlers, and the
+subsequent review of land questions by the Northumberland and
+Lycoming County courts to evaluate the tribunal, its members, and
+its procedures. However, these data are more than adequate in
+giving us a picture of this <i>de facto</i>, though illegal, rule, which existed
+in the West Branch Valley until the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784
+brought the territory under Commonwealth jurisdiction. The composition
+of the electorate varied with the fluctuations in population
+caused by the two Stanwix treaties, the Revolution, and the Great
+Runaway.</p>
+
+<p>Since property and religious qualifications were the primary prerequisites
+to voting at this time, it seems logical to assume that a
+similar basis for suffrage operated in the West Branch Valley.<a name="FNanchor_8_81" id="FNanchor_8_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_81" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> Having
+no regular church&mdash;the first, a Presbyterian, was not organized
+until 1792&mdash;property qualifications appear to have been the basis for
+what, in this area, was practically universal manhood suffrage. Due<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span>
+to the fact that the entire settlement consisted of squatters, practically
+all of the heads of households were property holders, regardless
+of the questionable legality of their holdings. The tax lists indicate
+holdings of some 100 to 300 acres on the average for residents, so it
+is particularly difficult to know whether or not a minimum holding
+requirement prevailed. The Provincial suffrage requirement in this
+period was generally fifty acres of land or &pound;50 of personal property.<a name="FNanchor_9_82" id="FNanchor_9_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_82" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>Although this study encompasses a fifteen-year period from 1769
+to 1784, it appears that the Fair Play system functioned for about
+five years, from 1773 to 1778. This is due to the fact that only "fourty
+Improvements,"<a name="FNanchor_10_83" id="FNanchor_10_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_83" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> meaning forty family settlements, existed in the
+area by 1773, and that following the Great Runaway of 1778, the
+territory was almost devoid of settlers. The void was filled, however,
+when settlers began returning toward the end of the Revolution and
+following the accession of the territory in the second Stanwix Treaty,
+in 1784. Thus, for all practical purposes, the functioning of the Fair
+Play system was confined to this more limited time. Furthermore,
+the system was supplemented in 1776 by the introduction of the
+Committee of Safety, and later that year by the Council of Safety.<a name="FNanchor_11_84" id="FNanchor_11_84"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_84" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+<p>As is indicated in Smith's <i>Laws</i>, annual meetings were held to
+select the governing tribunal of three for the ensuing year. Generally
+convened at some readily accessible place, these sessions were presumably
+held in the open or at one of the frontier forts erected in
+the area: Fort Antes, across the river from Jersey Shore; or Fort
+Horn, located on the south side of the Susquehanna about eight
+miles west of Jersey Shore. There were frontier forts in the vicinity
+of the present Muncy&mdash;Fort Muncy&mdash;and Lock Haven&mdash;Fort Reed;
+but Fort Muncy was some twenty-odd miles east of the Fair Play
+territory and Fort Reed was beyond the Great Island at its western
+extremity. As a result, these outposts were unlikely meeting places
+for the tribunal or for its election.<a name="FNanchor_12_85" id="FNanchor_12_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_85" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> Unfortunately, there is no
+recorded evidence of a specific meeting of the Fair Play men.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span></p>
+<p>The authority of the Fair Play tribunal extended across the entire
+territory from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island on the north side
+of the West Branch of the Susquehanna. However, most of the disputed
+cases, which can be verified by subsequent court reviews in
+either Northumberland or Lycoming counties, seem to have involved
+land claims in the area between Lycoming and Pine creeks.
+The tribunal accepted or rejected claims for settlement in the area
+and decided boundary questions and other controversies among
+settlers.<a name="FNanchor_13_86" id="FNanchor_13_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_86" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> As to a specific code of laws, there is none of record.
+However, the cases subsequently reviewed in the established county
+courts refer to some of their regular practices. For example, any man
+who left his improvement for six weeks without leaving someone to
+continue it, lost his right to the improvement;<a name="FNanchor_14_87" id="FNanchor_14_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_87" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> any man who went
+into the army could count on the Fair Play men (the tribunal) to
+protect his property;<a name="FNanchor_15_88" id="FNanchor_15_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_88" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> any man who sought land in the territory was
+obliged to obtain not only the approval of the Fair Play men but
+also of his nearest potential neighbors;<a name="FNanchor_16_89" id="FNanchor_16_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_89" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> and the summary process
+of ejectment which the Fair Play men exercised was real and certain
+and sometimes supported by the militia.<a name="FNanchor_17_90" id="FNanchor_17_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_90" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>
+
+<p>The specific membership of the Fair Play tribunal is rather difficult
+to ascertain due to its failure to keep minutes of its proceedings and
+the absence of any recorded code. However, as indicated earlier,<a name="FNanchor_18_91" id="FNanchor_18_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_91" class="fnanchor">[18]</a>
+the existence of the tribunal between the years 1773 and 1778, and its
+actual composition in 1775 and 1776, have already been established
+from the review of its decisions by the Circuit Court of Lycoming
+County. Assuming the principle of rotation from a contemporary<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span>
+description, some eighteen settlers held the positions of authority
+during the years noted.<a name="FNanchor_19_92" id="FNanchor_19_92"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_92" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> The cases reviewed reveal the names of five
+of these eighteen. Recognizing the limitations of our twenty-eight
+per cent sampling, however, it is interesting to note that the three
+major national stocks are represented in this restricted sample. Furthermore,
+as was mentioned previously,<a name="FNanchor_20_93" id="FNanchor_20_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_93" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> the Scotch-Irish settlers,
+being in the majority, enjoyed the majority representation on the
+tribunal. An analysis of leadership in the territory, to be developed
+more fully later, leads one to conclude that the Scotch-Irish, in the
+main, were the political leaders of the area.<a name="FNanchor_21_94" id="FNanchor_21_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_94" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p>
+
+<p>A diligent search of some sixty cases in the Court of Common
+Pleas in both Northumberland and Lycoming counties yielded some
+documentary evidence regarding the procedures of the Fair Play
+tribunal.<a name="FNanchor_22_95" id="FNanchor_22_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_95" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> Three cases in Lycoming County and one from Northumberland
+County contain depositions which describe the activities
+of the Fair Play men in some detail. One case, <i>Hughes</i> vs. <i>Dougherty</i>,
+was appealed to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth. All of
+the cases deal with the question of title to lands in the Fair Play
+territory following the purchase of these lands at the Treaty of
+Fort Stanwix in 1784. The depositions taken in conjunction with
+these cases indicate the processes of settlement and ejectment, in
+addition to the policies regarding land tenure. The fairness of the
+Fair Play decisions is noted by the fact that the regular courts concurred
+with the earlier judgments of the tribunal.<a name="FNanchor_23_96" id="FNanchor_23_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_96" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p>
+
+<p>An anecdote involving one of the Fair Play men, Peter Rodey,
+illustrates the nature of this frontier justice. According to legend,
+Chief Justice McKean of the State Supreme Court was holding court in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>
+this district, and, curious about the principles or code of the Fair Play
+men, he inquired about them of Peter Rodey, a former member of
+the tribunal. Rodey, unable to recall the details of the code, simply
+replied: "All I can say is, that since your Honor's coorts have come
+among us, <i>fair play</i> has entirely ceased, and law has taken its place."<a name="FNanchor_24_97" id="FNanchor_24_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_97" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p>
+
+<p>The justice of "fair play" and the nature of the system can be
+seen from an analysis of the cases reviewed subsequently in the established
+courts. As mentioned previously, these cases describe the
+procedures regarding settlement, land tenure, and ejectment. Although
+no recorded code of laws has been located, references to
+"resolutions of the Fair Play men" regularly appear in the depositions
+and summaries of these cases.<a name="FNanchor_25_98" id="FNanchor_25_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_98" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> According to Leyburn, a customary
+"law" concerning settlement rights operated on the frontier, particularly
+among the Scotch-Irish.<a name="FNanchor_26_99" id="FNanchor_26_99"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_99" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> This "law" recognized three settlement
+rights: "corn right," which established claims to 100 acres for
+each acre of grain planted; "tomahawk right," which marked off the
+area claimed by deadening trees at the boundaries of the claim; and,
+"cabin right," which confirmed the claim by the construction of a
+cabin upon the premises. If the decisions of the regular courts are
+at all indicative, Fair Play settlement was generally based upon
+"cabin right." However, the frequent allusion to "improvements"
+implies some secondary consideration to what Leyburn has defined
+as "corn right."</p>
+
+<p>In the case of <i>Hughes</i> vs. <i>Dougherty</i>, the significance of "improvements,"
+or "corn rights," vis-&agrave;-vis "cabin rights" is particularly noted.<a name="FNanchor_27_100" id="FNanchor_27_100"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_100" class="fnanchor">[27]</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span>
+The following summary of that case, found in <i>Pennsylvania Reports</i>,
+emphasizes that significance, in addition to defining a Fair Play
+"code" pertaining to land tenure:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>THIS was an ejectment for 324 acres of land, part of the
+Indian lands in <i>Northumberland</i> county.</p>
+
+<p>The plaintiff claimed under a warrant issued on the 2d
+<i>May</i> 1785, for the premises, and a survey made thereon upon
+the 10th <i>January</i> 1786. The defendant, on the 20th <i>June</i>
+1785, entered a caveat against the claims of the plaintiff, and
+on the 5th <i>October</i> following, took out a warrant for the land
+in dispute, on which he was then settled. Both claimed the
+pre-emption under the act of 21st <i>December</i> 1784,<a name="FNanchor_28_101" id="FNanchor_28_101"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_101" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> and on
+the evidence given the facts appeared to be:</p>
+
+<p>That in 1773, one <i>James Hughes</i>, a brother of the plaintiff,
+settled on the lands in question and made some small improvements.
+In the next year he enlarged his improvement,
+and cut logs to build an house. In the winter following he
+went to his father's in <i>Donegal</i> in <i>Lancaster</i> county, and died
+there. His elder brother <i>Thomas</i> was at that time settled on
+the Indian land, and one of the "Fair Play Men," who had
+assembled together and made a resolution, (which they
+agreed to enforce as the law of the place,) that "if any person
+was absent from his "settlement for six weeks he should forfeit
+his right." [Quotation marks as published.]</p>
+
+<p>In the spring of 1775 the defendant came to the settlement,
+and was advised by the Fair Play Men to settle on the premises
+which <i>Hughes</i> had left; this he did, and built a cabin.
+The plaintiff soon after came, claiming it in right of his
+brother, and aided by <i>Thomas Hughes</i>, took possession of
+the cabin; but the defendant collecting his friends, an affray
+ensued, in which <i>Hughes</i> was beaten off and the defendant
+left in possession. He continued to improve, built an house
+and stable, and cleared about ten acres. In 1778 he was
+driven off by the enemy and entered into the army. At the
+close of the war, both plaintiff and defendant returned to
+the settlement, each claiming the land in dispute.</p>
+
+<p>The warrant was taken out in the name of <i>James Hughes</i>,
+(the father of the plaintiff who is since dead,) for the benefit
+of his children.</p>
+
+<p>After argument by Mr. <i>Charles Smith</i> and Mr. <i>Duncan</i> for
+the plaintiff, and Mr. <i>Daniel Smith</i> and Mr. <i>Read</i> for the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span>
+defendant, Justice <i>Shippen</i> in the charge of the court to the
+jury, said&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>The dispute here, is between a first improvement, and a
+subsequent but much more valuable improvement. But
+neither of the parties has any legal or equitable right, but
+under the act of the 21st <i>December</i> 1784. The settlement
+on this land was against law. It was an offence that tended to
+involve this country in blood. But the merit and sufferings
+of the actual settlers cancelled the offence, and the legislature,
+mindful of their situation, provided this special act for their
+relief. The preamble recites their "resolute stand and sufferings,"
+as deserving a right of pre-emption. The legislature
+had no eye to any person who was not one of the occupiers
+after the commencement of the war, and a transient settler
+removed, (no matter how,) is not an object of the law. This
+is our construction of the act. <i>James Hughes</i> under whom
+the plaintiff claims, died before the war, the other occupied
+the premises after, and in the language of the act, "stood and
+suffered." If this construction be right, the cause is at an end.</p>
+
+<p>Besides, the plaintiff claims as the heir of <i>Thomas</i>, who
+was the heir of <i>James</i>, the first settler. I will not say that the
+fair play men could make a law to bind the settlers; but they
+might by agreement bind themselves. Now <i>Thomas</i> was one
+of these, and was bound by his conduct, from disputing the
+right of the defendant.</p>
+
+<p>This warrant it seems, is taken out in the name of the
+father, and it is said, as a trustee for his children. It is sometimes
+done for the benefit of all concerned. If this be the
+case, it may be well enough; but still it is not so regular,
+as it might have been[.] With these observations, we submit
+it to you.</p>
+
+<p class="signing">Verdict for the defendant.<a name="FNanchor_29_102" id="FNanchor_29_102"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_102" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p>
+</div>
+
+<p>This case, although originated in the Northumberland County
+Court in 1786, was appealed to the State Supreme Court, where the
+lower court decision was affirmed in 1791. The summary runs the
+gamut of Fair Play procedures from settlement, through questions
+of tenure, to ejectment. Its completeness indicates its usefulness.
+Partial and occasional depositions in the other cases cited help to
+round out the picture of the Fair Play "code."</p>
+
+<p>For example, the right of settlement included not only the approval
+of the Fair Play men, but also the acceptance of the prospective<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span>
+landholder by his neighbors. Allusions to this effect are made in the
+Coldren deposition as well as in the Huff-Latcha case. Eleanor
+Coldren's deposition, made at Sunbury, June 7, 1797, concerns the
+disputed title to certain lands of her deceased husband, Abraham
+Dewitt, opposite the Great Island. Her comments about neighbor
+approval demonstrate the point. She says, for instance, that</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>... in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and Cookson Long,
+two of the Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the deponent's
+house, next below Barnabas Bonner's Improvement, where
+Deponent's Husband kept a Tavern, and heard Antes and
+Long say that they (meaning the Fair-Play Men) and the
+Neighbors of the Settlement had unanimously agreed that
+James Irvin, James Parr, Abraham Dewitt and Barnabas
+Bonner should ... have their Improvement Rights fitted....</p></div>
+
+<p>She speaks of the resolution of the claims problem "as being the
+unanimous agreement of the Neighbors and Fair-Play Men...."<a name="FNanchor_30_103" id="FNanchor_30_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_103" class="fnanchor">[30]</a></p>
+
+<p>William King, who temporarily claimed part of the land involved
+in the dispute between Edmund Huff and Jacob Latcha, also refers
+to neighbor approval in his deposition taken in that case. He said,
+"I first went to Edmund Huff, then to Thomas Kemplen, Samuel
+Dougherty, William McMeans, and Thomas Ferguson, and asked if
+they would accept me as a neighbor...."<a name="FNanchor_31_104" id="FNanchor_31_104"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_104" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p>
+
+<p>Land tenure policy is noted by this same William King in the
+case of <i>James Grier</i> vs. <i>William Tharpe</i>. Repeating what we have
+already pointed out in the case of <i>Hughes</i> vs. <i>Dougherty</i>, King
+testified that "there was a law among the Fair-play men by which
+any man, who absented himself for the space of six weeks, lost his
+right to his improvement."<a name="FNanchor_32_105" id="FNanchor_32_105"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_105" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> In the Huff-Latcha case, King recounts
+the case of one Joseph Haines who "had once a right ... but had
+forfeited his right by the Fair-play law...."<a name="FNanchor_33_106" id="FNanchor_33_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_106" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
+
+<p>The forfeiture rule was tempered, however, in cases involving
+military service. Bratton Caldwell's deposition in <i>Grier</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i>
+is a case in point. Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men in 1776, declared
+that "Greer went into the army in 1776 and was a wagon-master<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span>
+till the fall of 1778.... In July, 1778, the Runaway, John
+Martin, had come on the land in his absence. The Fair-play men put
+Greer in possession. If a man went into the army, the Fair-play men
+protected his property."<a name="FNanchor_34_107" id="FNanchor_34_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_107" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> Meginness mentions a similar decision
+in the case of John Toner and Morgan Sweeney.<a name="FNanchor_35_108" id="FNanchor_35_108"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_108" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> Sweeney had attempted
+to turn a lease for improvements in Toner's behalf to possession
+for himself, but the Northumberland County Court honored
+the Fair Play rule concerning military service and decided in favor
+of Toner.</p>
+
+<p>The summary process of ejectment utilized by the Fair Play men,
+occasionally with militia support, is evident from William King's
+deposition in the Huff-Latcha case. King, having sold his right to one
+William Paul, recounts the method as follows:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>William Paul went on the land and finished his cabin.
+Soon after a party b[r]ought Robert Arthur and built a cabin
+near Paul's in which Arthur lived. Paul applied to the Fair-play
+men who decided in favor of Paul. Arthur would not
+go off. Paul made a complaint to the company at a muster at
+Quinashahague<a name="FNanchor_36_109" id="FNanchor_36_109"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_109" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> that Arthur still lived on the land and
+would not go off, although the Fair-play men had decided
+against him. I was one of the officers at that time and we
+agreed to come and run him off. The most of the company
+came down as far as Edmund Huff's who kept Stills. We got
+a keg of whisk[e]y and proceeded to Arthur's cabin. He was
+at home with his rifle in his hand and his wife had a bayonet
+on a stick, and they threatened death to the first person who
+would enter the house. The door was shut and Thomas Kemplen,
+our captain, made a run at the door, burst it open and
+instantly seized Arthur by the neck. We pulled down the
+cabin, threw it into the river, lashed two canoes together
+and put Arthur and his family and his goods into them and
+sent them down the river. William Paul then lived undisturbed
+upon the land until the Indians drove us all away.<a name="FNanchor_37_110" id="FNanchor_37_110"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_110" class="fnanchor">[37]</a>
+William Paul was then (1778) from home on a militia tour.<a name="FNanchor_38_111" id="FNanchor_38_111"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_111" class="fnanchor">[38]</a></p></div>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span></p><p>Although land disputes offer documentary evidence of the Fair
+Play system, it seems quite likely that the tribunal's jurisdiction
+extended to other matters. A few anecdotes, obviously based quite
+tenuously upon hearsay, will suffice to illustrate. Joseph Antes, son
+of Colonel Henry Antes, used to tell this story: It seems that one
+Francis Clark, who lived just west of Jersey Shore in the Fair Play
+territory, gained possession of a dog which belonged to an Indian.
+Upon learning of this, the Indian appealed to the Fair Play men,
+who ordered Clark's arrest and trial for the alleged theft. Clark was
+convicted and sentenced to be lashed. The punishment was to be
+inflicted by a person decided by lot, the responsibility falling upon
+the man drawing the red grain of corn from a bag containing grains
+of corn for each man present. Philip Antes was the reluctant "winner."
+The Indian, seeing that the decision of the "court" was to be
+carried out immediately, magnanimously suggested that banishment
+would serve better than flogging. Clark agreed and left for the
+Nippenose Valley, where his settlement is a matter of record.<a name="FNanchor_39_112" id="FNanchor_39_112"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_112" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p>
+
+<p>Another anecdote, if true, gives further testimony to the justice of
+Fair Play. In this instance, a minister and school teacher named Kincaid
+faced the Fair Play tribunal on the charge of abusing his family.
+Tried and convicted, he was sentenced to be ridden on a rail for his
+offense.<a name="FNanchor_40_113" id="FNanchor_40_113"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_113" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> Here again, the tale, though legendary, is made plausible
+by the established fact of Kincaid's residence in the area.<a name="FNanchor_41_114" id="FNanchor_41_114"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_114" class="fnanchor">[41]</a></p>
+
+<p>Doubtless the most notable political action of the Fair Play settlers
+is their declaration of independence, which Meginness calls "a remarkable
+coincidence" because "it took place about the same time
+that the Declaration was signed in Philadelphia!"<a name="FNanchor_42_115" id="FNanchor_42_115"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_115" class="fnanchor">[42]</a> Aware, as were
+many of the American colonists in the spring and summer of 1776,
+that independence was being debated in Philadelphia, these West
+Branch pioneers decided to absolve themselves from all allegiance to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span>
+the Crown and declare their own independence. Meeting under a
+large elm on the west bank of Pine Creek, mistakenly known as the
+"Tiadaghton Elm," the Fair Play men and settlers simply resolved
+their own right of self-determination, a principle upon which they
+had been acting for some time. Unfortunately, no record of the resolution
+has been preserved&mdash;if it was actually written. However, the
+names of the supposed signers, all bona fide Fair Play settlers, have
+been passed down to the present.<a name="FNanchor_43_116" id="FNanchor_43_116"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_116" class="fnanchor">[43]</a></p>
+
+<p>As every careful historian knows, no declaration was signed in
+Philadelphia on July 4, 1776, except by the clerk and presiding
+officer of the Continental Congress. Consequently, the Pine Creek
+story arouses justifiable skepticism. However, there does seem to be
+some evidence to substantiate this famous act.</p>
+
+<p>First of all, Fithian's <i>Journal</i> gives insight into the possible motivation
+for such independent action. In an entry for Thursday, July
+27, 1775, he writes of reviewing "the 'Squires Library," noting that
+"After some Perusal I fix'd in the Farmer's memorable Letters."<a name="FNanchor_44_117" id="FNanchor_44_117"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_117" class="fnanchor">[44]</a>
+Fithian was reading John Dickinson's <i>Letters from a Farmer in
+Pennsylvania</i>, which he had come across in the library of John Fleming,
+his host for a week in the West Branch Valley. Dickinson's dozen
+uncompromising epistles in opposition to the Grenville and Townshend
+programs both inspired and incited liberty-lovers. Furthermore,
+Fleming himself was a leader among the Fair Play settlers, and may
+have been aroused to action by the eloquence of Dickinson's expression.
+Every idea is an incitement to action and the ideas of <i>Letters
+from a Farmer</i>, which made Dickinson the chief American propagandist
+prior to Thomas Paine, reached into the frontier of the
+West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>The best contemporary evidence in support of the Pine Creek
+declaration is found in the widow's pension application of Anna
+Jackson Hamilton, daughter-in-law of Alexander Hamilton, who was
+one of the early settlers and a prominent leader along the West Branch
+of the Susquehanna. Mrs. Hamilton, whose pension application and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span>
+accompanying statement were made in 1858, lived within one mile
+of the reputedly historic elm. In her sworn statement she says, "I
+remember well the day independence was declared on the plains of
+Pine Creek, seeing such numbers flocking there, and Independence
+being all the talk, I had a knolege of what was doing."<a name="FNanchor_45_118" id="FNanchor_45_118"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_118" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> Her son
+John corroborates this in his statement that "She and an old colored
+woman are the only persons now living in the country who remembers
+the meeting of the 4th of July, 1776, at Pine Creek. She remembers
+it well."<a name="FNanchor_46_119" id="FNanchor_46_119"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_119" class="fnanchor">[46]</a> Mrs. Hamilton was ninety years old at the time of her
+declaration, which was made some eighty-two years after the celebrated
+event.<a name="FNanchor_47_120" id="FNanchor_47_120"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_120" class="fnanchor">[47]</a></p>
+
+<p>Following the outbreak of the Revolution and the meeting of the
+Second Continental Congress, the Fair Play system of the West Branch
+Valley was soon augmented by another extra-legal organization, the
+Committee of Safety. Ostensibly created for the purpose of raising and
+equipping a "suitable force to form Pennsylvania's quota of the
+Continental Army," it soon exercised executive authority dually with
+the assembly.<a name="FNanchor_48_121" id="FNanchor_48_121"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_121" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> The Council of Safety was instituted as the successor
+to the Committee of Safety by a resolution of the Provincial Convention
+of 1776, then meeting in Philadelphia to draw up a new constitution
+for Pennsylvania. It was continued by an act of the assembly
+that same year. It functioned from July 24, 1776, until it was dissolved
+on December 6, 1777, by a proclamation of the Supreme<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span>
+Executive Council.<a name="FNanchor_49_122" id="FNanchor_49_122"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_122" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> Locally, however, the township branches continued
+to function and were still referred to as "committees."</p>
+
+<p>It appears from the resolutions and actions of the local committee
+that the Fair Play men maintained jurisdiction in land questions, but
+that all other cases were within the range of the committee's authority.
+In fact, a resolution dated February 27, 1776, asserted that "the committee
+of Bald Eagle is the most competent judges of the circumstances
+of the people of that township."<a name="FNanchor_50_123" id="FNanchor_50_123"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_123" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> This resolution was made
+in conjunction with an order from the county committee to prevent
+the loss of rye and other grains which were being "carried out of the
+township for stilling."<a name="FNanchor_51_124" id="FNanchor_51_124"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_124" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> Although cautioned against "using too
+much rigor in their measures," the committee was advised to find
+"a medium between seizing of property and supplying the wants of
+the poor."<a name="FNanchor_52_125" id="FNanchor_52_125"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_125" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> The county committee even went so far as to recommend
+the suppression of such practices as "profaning the Sabbath in an
+unchristian and scandalous manner."<a name="FNanchor_53_126" id="FNanchor_53_126"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_126" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> In April of 1777, the county
+committee required an oath of allegiance from one William Reed,
+who had refused military service for reasons of conscience.<a name="FNanchor_54_127" id="FNanchor_54_127"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_127" class="fnanchor">[54]</a></p>
+
+<p>Although Bald Eagle Township did not, at this time, extend into
+Fair Play territory,<a name="FNanchor_55_128" id="FNanchor_55_128"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_128" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> it is interesting to note that the local committee,
+whose three members frequently changed, often included settlers
+from that territory or those who were in close association with the
+Fair Play men.<a name="FNanchor_56_129" id="FNanchor_56_129"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_129" class="fnanchor">[56]</a> The Revolution apparently gave a certain quasi-legality
+to the claims of the "outlaws" of the West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>One further political note is worthy of mention. After Lexington
+and Concord and the formation of the various committees of safety,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span>
+the civil officers of Bald Eagle Township, that is to say the constable,
+supervisor, and overseers, were often chosen from among settlers on
+the borders of, or actually in, Fair Play territory.<a name="FNanchor_57_130" id="FNanchor_57_130"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_130" class="fnanchor">[57]</a></p>
+
+<p>The politics of fair play then was nothing more than that&mdash;fair
+play. It was a pragmatic system which the necessities of the frontier
+experience, more than national or ethnic origin, had developed. The
+"codes" of operation represented a consensus, equally, freely, and
+fairly arrived at&mdash;a common "law" based upon general agreement and
+practical acceptance. There were subsequent appeals to regular courts
+of law, but, surprisingly enough, in every instance the fairness of
+the judgments was sustained. No Fair Play decision was reversed.
+Furthermore, the frequency of elections and the use of the principle
+of rotation in office were additional assurances against the usurpation
+of power by any small clique or ruling class. Popular sovereignty,
+political equality, and popular consultation&mdash;these were the basic elements
+of fair play.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_74" id="Footnote_1_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_74"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> <i>Colonial Records</i>, X, 95. The Fair Play settlers were outlawed by a proclamation
+of the Council signed by Governor John Penn on Sept. 20, 1773. The proclamation
+was issued "strictly enjoyning and requiring all and every Person and Persons,
+already settled or Residing on any Lands beyond the Boundary Line of the Last
+Indian Purchase, immediately to evacuate their illegal Settlements, and to depart
+and remove themselves from the said Lands without Delay, on pain of being
+prosecuted with the utmost rigour of the Law." The "Last Indian Purchase"
+referred to here is, of course, the Stanwix Treaty of 1768.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_75" id="Footnote_2_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_75"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_76" id="Footnote_3_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_76"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Richard W. Leopold and Arthur S. Link (eds.), <i>Problems in American History</i>
+(Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957), p. 22. The entire first problem in this excellent
+text deals with the question of authority in American government.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_77" id="Footnote_4_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_77"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> This Fair Play system was certainly not unique, for other frontier societies
+employed the same technique, even down to the ruling tribunal of three members.
+See Solon and Elizabeth Buck, <i>The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania</i>
+(Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431, 451. However, it must be pointed out that the Bucks'
+"Fair Play" reference is based on Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195, which Samuel P. Bates
+used in "a general application of the practice to W. Pa. areas after 1768," in his
+<i>History of Greene County, Pennsylvania</i> (Chicago, 1888). This was the interpretation
+given in a letter from Dr. Alfred P. James to the author, July 17, 1963. Dr.
+James also says that "It is possible that there are evidences of Fair Play Men titles
+in the court records of Washington and Greene Counties."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_78" id="Footnote_5_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_78"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> This designation was often employed to classify those settlers who took up lands
+beyond the limits of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768, that is to say, west of
+Lycoming Creek on the north side of the West Branch of the Susquehanna.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_79" id="Footnote_6_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_79"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," p. 5. Mrs.
+Russell, whose historical accuracy can be verified through her indicated sources,
+refers to old borough minutes of Jersey Shore as her source for the names of the
+tribunal of 1776, namely, Bartram Caldwell, John Walker, and James Brandon.
+Upon discussing the matter with her, I learned that a clipping from an old Jersey
+Shore paper, now lost, which described the minutes, was her actual source. However,
+adequate documentation and meticulous research characterize her work. Furthermore,
+Bratton Caldwell (he signed his name Bartram) is also labeled a Fair Play
+official by Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers, 1773-1785," p. 422. Linn's
+identification comes in the case of <i>Greer</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i>, Greer's case being a pre-emption
+claim on the basis of military service.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_80" id="Footnote_7_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_80"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," <i>Now and Then</i>, XII (1959), 220-222. The
+deposition reads "That in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and Cookson Long,
+two of the Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the deponent's house...."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_81" id="Footnote_8_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_81"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Oscar T. Barck, Jr. and Hugh T. Lefler, <i>Colonial America</i> (New York, 1958),
+pp. 258-260. Although Barck and Lefler indicate in this section on "The Colonial
+Franchise" that universal suffrage did not prevail in the colonies, they do note
+the significance of "free land," of which Fair Play territory was an excellent example.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_82" id="Footnote_9_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_82"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> <i>Ibid</i>, p. 260.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_83" id="Footnote_10_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_83"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> William Cooke to James Tilghman, <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, First Series, XII,
+286-287.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_84" id="Footnote_11_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_84"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Fourth Series, III, 545-546.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_85" id="Footnote_12_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_85"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> <i>Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts of Pennsylvania</i>
+(Harrisburg, 1896), I, 390, 392, 394-418.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_86" id="Footnote_13_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_86"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_87" id="Footnote_14_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_87"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 424. This six weeks provision
+is noted in the deposition of John Sutton in the case of <i>William Greer</i> vs. <i>William
+Tharpe</i>, dated March 13, 1797.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_88" id="Footnote_15_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_88"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 422. Bratton Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men, indicates this practice in
+his deposition in the <i>Greer</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i> case.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_89" id="Footnote_16_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_89"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_90" id="Footnote_17_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_90"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424. William King, in
+his deposition taken March 15, 1801, in <i>Huff</i> vs. <i>Satcha</i> [sic], in the Circuit Court of
+Lycoming County, notes the use of a company of militia, of which he was an officer,
+to eject a settler. Linn errs in his reference to the defendant as "Satcha." The man's
+name was Latcha, according to the Appearance Docket Commencing 1797, No. 2,
+Lycoming County.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_91" id="Footnote_18_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_91"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>See</i> nn. 6 and 7, p. <a href="#Page_33">33</a>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_92" id="Footnote_19_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_92"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195. <i>See also</i>, pp. 31 and 32, this chapter, in which the excerpt
+from this source is quoted verbatim.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_93" id="Footnote_20_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_93"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> <i>Supra</i>, p. <a href="#Page_33">33</a>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_94" id="Footnote_21_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_94"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> <i>Infra</i>, <a href="#CHAPTER_SIX">Chapter Six</a>. The question of leadership in conjunction with the problems
+of this frontier is discussed in Chapter Six.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_95" id="Footnote_22_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_95"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> The Appearance Dockets and Files were checked for Northumberland County
+from 1784 to 1795 and for Lycoming County from 1795 to 1801. These records,
+obtained in the offices of the respective prothonotaries, produced thirty-seven cases
+in Northumberland and twenty-two in Lycoming County dealing with former Fair
+Play settlers. Unfortunately, only four were reviews of actual Fair Play decisions.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_96" id="Footnote_23_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_96"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Northumberland County originated in 1772 and Lycoming County in 1795.
+Clinton County was not created until 1839.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_97" id="Footnote_24_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_97"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (Philadelphia, 1857), p. 172.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_98" id="Footnote_25_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_98"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> The cases referred to here are: <i>Hughes</i> vs. <i>Dougherty</i>, <i>Huff</i> vs. <i>Satcha</i>, and
+<i>Grier</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i>. They were located in the Appearance Dockets of Lycoming
+and Northumberland counties in the respective prothonotaries' offices. <i>Hughes</i> vs.
+<i>Dougherty</i> appears in the Northumberland County Docket for November, 1783, to
+August, 1786, in the February term of the Court of Common Pleas, file 42. Both
+the Huff and Grier cases were found in the Lycoming County Docket No. 2, commencing
+1797, court terms and file numbers indicated as follows: <i>Huff</i> vs. <i>Satcha</i>,
+February, 1799, #2, and <i>Grier</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i>, May, 1800, #41. A partial deposition by
+Eleanor Coldren, <i>Now and Then</i>, XII (1959), 220-222, was also employed. Although
+the case appears to be <i>Dewitt</i> vs. <i>Dunn</i>, I could not locate it in the Appearance
+Dockets. Depositions taken in the Huff and Grier cases were published in Linn,
+"Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_99" id="Footnote_26_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_99"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 205.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_100" id="Footnote_27_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_100"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> Jasper Yeates, <i>Pennsylvania Reports</i>, I (Philadelphia, 1817), 497-498.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_101" id="Footnote_28_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_101"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_102" id="Footnote_29_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_102"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Yeates, <i>Pennsylvania Reports</i>, I, 497-498.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_103" id="Footnote_30_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_103"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_104" id="Footnote_31_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_104"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 422.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_105" id="Footnote_32_105"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_105"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_106" id="Footnote_33_106"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_106"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_107" id="Footnote_34_107"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_107"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_108" id="Footnote_35_108"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_108"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 469.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_109" id="Footnote_36_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_109"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Now Linden, in Woodward Township, a few miles west of Williamsport.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_110" id="Footnote_37_110"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_110"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> King refers here to the Great Runaway of 1778.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_111" id="Footnote_38_111"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_111"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 423-424.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_112" id="Footnote_39_112"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_112"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 470.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_113" id="Footnote_40_113"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_113"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 471.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_114" id="Footnote_41_114"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_114"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> D. S. Maynard, <i>Historical View of Clinton County</i> (Lock Haven, 1875), pp.
+207-208. Maynard has reprinted here some excerpts from John Hamilton's "Early
+Times on the West Branch," which was published in the Lock Haven <i>Republican</i>
+in 1875. Unfortunately, recurrent floods destroyed most of the newspaper files, and
+copies of this series are not now available. John Hamilton was a third-generation
+descendant of Alexander Hamilton, one of the original Fair Play settlers.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_115" id="Footnote_42_115"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_115"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1857), p. 193.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_116" id="Footnote_43_116"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_116"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i> An alleged copy of the declaration published in <i>A Picture of Clinton
+County</i> (Lock Haven, 1942), p. 38, is clearly spurious. The language of this
+Pennsylvania Writers' project of the W.P.A. is obviously twentieth-century, and
+it contains references to events which had not yet occurred.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_117" id="Footnote_44_117"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_117"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, p. 72.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_118" id="Footnote_45_118"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_118"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Muncy Historical Society, Muncy, Pa., Wagner Collection, Anna Jackson Hamilton
+to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions, Dec. 16, 1858.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_46_119" id="Footnote_46_119"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_119"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, John Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions,
+May 27, 1859.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_47_120" id="Footnote_47_120"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_120"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> The veracity of the witness is an important question here. Meginness, in his
+1857 edition, devotes a footnote, p. 168, to this remarkable woman who was in full
+possession of her faculties at the time. The Rev. John Grier, son-in-law of Mrs.
+Hamilton and brother of Supreme Court Justice Robert C. Grier, wrote to President
+Buchanan on Nov. 12, 1858, (Wagner Collection), stating that "Mrs. Hamilton
+is one of the most intelligent in our community." Buchanan then wrote an affidavit
+in support of Grier's statements to the Commissioner of Pensions, Nov. 27, 1858,
+(Wagner Collection). Aside from the declarations of Mrs. Hamilton and her son,
+the only other support, and this is hearsay, is found in the account of an alleged
+conversation between W. H. Sanderson and Robert Couvenhoven, the famed scout.
+W. H. Sanderson, <i>Historical Reminiscences</i>, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker (Altoona,
+1920), pp. 6-8. Here again, the fact that the reminiscences were not recorded until
+some seventy years after the "chats" raises serious doubts.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_48_121" id="Footnote_48_121"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_121"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Fourth Series, III, 545.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_49_122" id="Footnote_49_122"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_122"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 546.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_50_123" id="Footnote_50_123"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_123"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 473.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_51_124" id="Footnote_51_124"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_124"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_52_125" id="Footnote_52_125"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_125"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_53_126" id="Footnote_53_126"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_126"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_54_127" id="Footnote_54_127"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_127"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i> <i>See also</i> John H. Carter, "The Committee of Safety of Northumberland
+County," <i>The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>,
+XVIII (1950), 44-45.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_55_128" id="Footnote_55_128"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_128"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#Page_x">map</a> of the Fair Play territory in Chapter One.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_56_129" id="Footnote_56_129"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_129"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 469. <i>See also</i>, Carter, "The
+Committee of Safety," pp. 33-45, for a full account of the activities of the Committee.
+Carter notes that the county committee consisted of thirty-three members,
+three from each of the eleven townships chosen for a period of six months.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_57_130" id="Footnote_57_130"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_130"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, pp. 472-474.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_FOUR" id="CHAPTER_FOUR"></a><small>CHAPTER FOUR</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>The Farmers' Frontier</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>The economy of the West Branch Valley was basically agrarian&mdash;a
+farmers' frontier. The "new order of Americanism"<a name="FNanchor_1_131" id="FNanchor_1_131"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_131" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>
+which arose on this frontier was in part due to the cultural background
+of its inhabitants, the knowledge and traditional values which
+they had brought with them. It was further influenced by the frontier
+status of the region itself&mdash;an area of virgin land in the earliest stages
+of development. And finally, it was affected by the physical characteristics
+of the territory, particularly the mountains which separated
+these settlers from the more established settlements. It has been said
+that "many of the enduring characteristics of the American creed and
+the American national character originated in the way of life of the
+colonial farmer."<a name="FNanchor_2_132" id="FNanchor_2_132"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_132" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> The Fair Play territory was typical of this development.</p>
+
+<p>The early pioneer, particularly if he was Scotch-Irish, generally
+came into the area from the Cumberland Valley, the "seed-plot and
+nursery" of the Scotch-Irish in America, the "original reservoir" of
+this leading frontier stock, via the Great Shamokin Path.<a name="FNanchor_3_133" id="FNanchor_3_133"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_133" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Since there
+were no roads, only Indian trails, the frontier traveler customarily
+followed the Indian paths which had been cleared along the rivers
+and streams. The Great Shamokin Path followed the Susquehanna
+from Shamokin (now Sunbury) to the West Branch, then out along
+the West Branch to the Allegheny Mountains.<a name="FNanchor_4_134" id="FNanchor_4_134"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_134" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> Loading his wife and
+smaller children on a pack horse, his scanty possessions on another
+horse, the prospective settler drove a cow or two into the wild frontier
+at the rate of about twenty miles a day.<a name="FNanchor_5_135" id="FNanchor_5_135"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_135" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> This meant that a
+trip of approximately two days brought him from Fort Augusta to
+the Fair Play country.</p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span></p><p>Indian paths were the primary means of ingress and egress, although
+supplemented by the waterways which they paralleled. In
+addition to the Great Shamokin Path, there were paths up Lycoming
+Creek (the Sheshequin Path), and up Pine Creek, besides the path
+which followed Bald Eagle Creek down into the Juniata Valley. These
+trails and adjoining water routes were usually traveled on horseback
+or in canoes, depending upon the route to be followed. However,
+the rivers and streams were more often passages of departure than
+courses of entry.</p>
+
+<p>Established roads, that is authorized public constructions, were not
+to reach the West Branch region until 1775, although the Northumberland
+County Court ordered such construction and reported on it
+at the October term in 1772.<a name="FNanchor_6_136" id="FNanchor_6_136"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_136" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> Appointments were made at the August
+session of 1775 "to view, and if they saw cause, to lay out a bridle
+road from the mouth of Bald Eagle Creek to the town of Sunbury."<a name="FNanchor_7_137" id="FNanchor_7_137"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_137" class="fnanchor">[7]</a>
+It was not until ten years later that extensions of this road were
+authorized, carrying it into the Nittany Valley and to Bald Eagle's
+Nest (near Milesburg, on the Indian path from the Great Island to
+Ohio).<a name="FNanchor_8_138" id="FNanchor_8_138"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_138" class="fnanchor">[8]</a></p>
+
+<p>Travel was usually on horseback or on foot. Canoes and flatboats,
+or simply rafts, were used on the rivers and creeks where available.
+Wagons, however, appeared after the construction of public roads
+and were seen in the Great Runaway of 1778.<a name="FNanchor_9_139" id="FNanchor_9_139"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_139" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>The problem of communication between the frontier and the settled
+areas was a difficult one compounded by the natural geographic
+barriers and the fact that post and coach roads did not extend into
+this central Pennsylvania region. As a result the inhabitants had to
+depend upon occasional travelers, circuit riders, surveyors, and other
+Provincial authorities who visited them infrequently. Otherwise, the
+meetings of the Fair Play tribunal, irregular as they were, and the
+communications from the county Committee of Safety were about
+the only sources of information available. Of course, cabin-building,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span>
+cornhusking, and quilting parties provided ample opportunities for
+the dissemination of strictly "local" news.</p>
+
+<p>Newspapers were not introduced into the upper Susquehanna Valley
+until around the turn of the century. The <i>Northumberland
+Gazette</i> was published in Sunbury in 1797 or 1798.<a name="FNanchor_10_140" id="FNanchor_10_140"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_140" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> The first truly
+West Branch paper was not circulated until 1802, when the <i>Lycoming
+Gazette</i> was first published in Williamsport.<a name="FNanchor_11_141" id="FNanchor_11_141"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_141" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> On the eve
+of the Revolution there were only seven newspapers available in the
+entire Province, none of which circulated as far north as the Fair
+Play territory.<a name="FNanchor_12_142" id="FNanchor_12_142"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_142" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> As a matter of fact, there were only thirty-seven
+papers printed in all thirteen colonies at the beginning of the Revolution.<a name="FNanchor_13_143" id="FNanchor_13_143"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_143" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p>
+
+<p>The Fair Play settler was an "outlaw," a squatter who came into
+this central Pennsylvania wilderness with his family and without the
+benefit of a land grant, and who literally hacked and carved out a
+living. The natural elements, the savage natives, and the wild life all
+resisted him; but he conquered them all, and the conquest gave him
+a feeling of accomplishment which enhanced his independent spirit.</p>
+
+<p>If the story of the Great Plains frontier can be told in terms of railroads,
+barbed-wire fences, windmills, and six-shooters,<a name="FNanchor_14_144" id="FNanchor_14_144"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_144" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> then the
+cruder tale of the West Branch frontier can be told in terms of the
+rifle, the axe, and the plow. The rifle, first and foremost as the
+weapon of security, was the basic means of self-preservation in a wild
+land where survival was a constant question.<a name="FNanchor_15_145" id="FNanchor_15_145"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_145" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> The axe, which Theodore
+Roosevelt later described as "a servant hardly standing second
+even to the rifle,"<a name="FNanchor_16_146" id="FNanchor_16_146"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_146" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> was the main implement of destruction and construction.
+It was used for clearing the forest of the many trees which
+encroached upon the acreage which the settler had staked out for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span>
+himself, and for cutting the logs which would provide the rude, one-room
+shelter the pioneer constructed for himself and his family. The
+crude wooden plow was the implement which made this frontiersman
+a farmer, although its effectiveness was extremely limited. However,
+the soil was so fertile, and the weeds so sparse, that scratching the
+earth and scattering seeds produced a crop.<a name="FNanchor_17_147" id="FNanchor_17_147"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_147" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>
+
+<p>A contemporary description of squatter settlements in Muncy Hills,
+some twenty-odd miles east of the Fair Play territory, but in the
+West Branch Valley, gives a vivid picture of the nature of these early
+establishments:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>They came from no Body enquires where, or how, but generally
+with Families, fix on any Spot in the Wood that
+pleases them. Cut down some trees &amp; make up a Log Hut in a
+Day, clear away the underweed &amp; girdle.... The Trees they
+have no use for if cut down after their Hut is made. They
+dig up &amp; harrow the Ground, plant Potatoes, a Crop which
+they get out in three Months, sow Corn, etc., (&amp; having
+sown in peace by the Law of the Land they are secured in
+reaping in peace) &amp; continue at Work without ever enquiring
+whose the Land is, until the Proprietor himself disturbs
+&amp; drives them off with Difficulty.<a name="FNanchor_18_148" id="FNanchor_18_148"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_148" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>This experience was duplicated in the Fair Play territory where
+there were no immediate neighbors whose permission was necessary
+for settlement, or until a dispute was carried to the tribunal for
+adjudication. This procedure was detailed in the last chapter.</p>
+
+<p>Having selected a site, preferably on or near a stream, and obtained
+approval from the Fair Play men and his neighbors, the prospective
+settler was faced with the long and tedious work of clearing
+the land for his home and farm. This was an extended effort for he
+could clear only a few acres a year. In the meantime, his survival
+depended upon the few provisions he brought with him&mdash;some grain
+for meal, a little flour, and perhaps some salt pork and smoked meat.
+These supplies, combined with the wild game and fish which abounded
+in the area, served until such a time as crops could be produced. It
+was a rigorous life complicated by the fact that the meager supplies<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>
+often ran out before the first crop was brought in. The first month's
+meals were too often variations on the limited fare of water porridge
+and hulled corn, as described by a later pioneer.<a name="FNanchor_19_149" id="FNanchor_19_149"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_149" class="fnanchor">[19]</a></p>
+
+<p>Homes in the Fair Play territory were built "to <i>live</i> in, and not
+for <i>show</i>...."<a name="FNanchor_20_150" id="FNanchor_20_150"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_150" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> The following description, by the grandson of one
+of the original settlers, illustrates the cooperative nature of the enterprise,
+in addition to giving a clear picture of the type of construction
+which replaced the early lean-to shelter with which the
+frontiersman was first acquainted:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Our buildings are made of hewn logs, on an average 24
+feet long by 20 wide, sometimes a wall of stone, a foot or
+more above the level of the earth, raised as a foundation;
+but in general, four large stones are laid at the corners, and
+the building raised on <i>them</i>. The house is covered sometimes
+with shingles, sometimes with clapboards. [The latter required
+no laths, rafters, or nails, and was put on in less
+time.] ... The ground logs being laid saddle-shaped, on
+the upper edge, is cut in with an axe, at the ends, as long as
+the logs are thick, then the end logs are raised and a "notch"
+cut to fit the saddle. This is the only kind of tie or binder
+they have; and when the building is raised as many rounds
+as it is intended, the ribs are raised, on which a course of
+clapboards is laid, butts resting on a "butting pole." A press
+pole is laid on the clapboards immediately over the ribs to
+keep them from shifting by the wind, and the pole is kept to
+its berth by stay blocks, resting in the first course against the
+butting-pole. The logs are run upon the building on skids
+by the help of wooden forks. The most experienced "axe-man"
+are placed on the buildings as "cornermen;" the rest of
+the company are on the ground to carry the logs and run
+them up.<a name="FNanchor_21_151" id="FNanchor_21_151"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_151" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>In this fashion, the frontier cabin was raised and covered in a single
+day, without a mason, without a pound of iron, and with nothing
+but dirt for flooring. The doors and windows were subsequently cut
+out of the structure to suit the tastes of its occupants.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In this one-room cabin lived the frontier settler and his family, who
+might be joined by guests. Small wonder, then, that additions to
+this construction took on such significance that they were items of
+mention in later wills.<a name="FNanchor_22_152" id="FNanchor_22_152"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_152" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p>
+
+<p>Once having cleared a reasonable portion of his property, raised
+his cabin, and scratched out an existence for his first few months of
+occupation, the pioneer was now ready to get down to the business of
+farming. Working around the stumps which cluttered his improvement,
+the frontier farmer planted his main crops, which were, of
+course, the food grains&mdash;wheat, rye, with oats, barley, and corn, and
+buckwheat and corn for the livestock. Some indication of the planting
+and harvesting seasons can be seen from this account:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>I find Wheat is sown here in the Fall (beging. of Septr.)
+Clover &amp; timothy Grass is generally sown with it. The Wheat
+is cut in June or beginning of July after which the Grass
+grows very rapidly &amp; always affords two Crops. Where
+Grass has not been sown they harrow the Ground well where
+the Wheat is taken off &amp; sow Buck Wheat which ripens
+by the beginning &amp; through September is excellent food for
+Poultry &amp; Cattle &amp; makes good Cakes.<a name="FNanchor_23_153" id="FNanchor_23_153"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_153" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>The amazing fertility of the soil, as noted by more than one journalist,
+eased the difficulties of the crude wooden implements which
+were the farmer's tools. Reference is made to "one [who] plowed the
+same spot ... for eight years ... [taking] double Crops without giving
+it an Ounce of Manure."<a name="FNanchor_24_154" id="FNanchor_24_154"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_154" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> Scientific farming had not yet come to the
+West Branch Valley, although the Philadelphia area had been
+awakened to its possibilities through the publications of Franklin's
+American Philosophical Society.</p>
+
+<p>Fertile soil was practically essential when one considers the crude
+implements with which the frontier farmer carried on his hazardous
+vocation. In addition to the crude wooden plow, which we have already
+mentioned, the agrarian pioneer of the West Branch possessed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span>
+a long-bladed sickle, a homemade rake, a homemade hay fork, and a
+grain shovel.<a name="FNanchor_25_155" id="FNanchor_25_155"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_155" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> All of these items were made of wood and were of
+the crudest sort.<a name="FNanchor_26_156" id="FNanchor_26_156"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_156" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> As time went on, he added a few tools of his own
+invention, but these, and his sturdy curved-handled axe, constituted
+the essential instruments of the farmer's craft.</p>
+
+<p>July was the month of harvest for the mainly "subsistence" farmers
+scattered along the West Branch. The uncertainties of the weather
+and the number of acres planted had some influence upon the harvesting,
+so that it was not unusual to see the wheat still swaying in
+the warm summer breezes in the last week of July. However, if possible,
+the grain was generally cut the first part of the month in order
+that buckwheat, or other fodder, might be sown and harvested in
+the fall.</p>
+
+<p>Harvesttime was a cooperative enterprise and whole families joined
+in "bringing in the sheaves." The grain had to be cut and raked
+into piles, and the piles bundled into shocks tied together with stalks
+of the grain itself. This took "hands" and the frontier family was
+generally the only labor force available. In time, however, field work
+was confined to the men of the family among the Scotch-Irish, who
+attached social significance to the type of work done by their women.</p>
+
+<p>Fithian's <i>Journal</i> reveals, however, that class-consciousness was not
+yet apparent in the division of labor on this frontier. On two occasions
+he describes daughters of leading families engaged in other than
+household tasks. Arriving at the home of Squire Fleming, with
+whom he was to stay for a week, Fithian notes on July 25, 1775, that
+Betsey Fleming, his host's daughter, "was milking."<a name="FNanchor_27_157" id="FNanchor_27_157"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_157" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> The very next
+day, upon visiting the Squire's brother, who had "two fine Daughter's,"
+this Presbyterian journalist found "One of them reaping."<a name="FNanchor_28_158" id="FNanchor_28_158"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_158" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> If
+Leyburn's comment that social status among the Scotch-Irish depended
+in part upon the work done by the women of the family, then these
+examples attest to the fact that "status" was a luxury which the Fair
+Play settlers could not yet afford.<a name="FNanchor_29_159" id="FNanchor_29_159"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_159" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span></p><p>Threshing was either done by hand with flails, or, if the family had
+a cow or two (and the tax lists indicate that they did), the grain was
+separated by driving the livestock around and around over the unbundled
+straw. Finally, the chaff was removed by throwing the grain
+into the air while the breeze was flowing. The grain was then collected
+and readied for milling.</p>
+
+<p>Gristmills were available in the West Branch Valley almost from
+the outset of settlement due to the many fine streams which flowed
+through the territory. As a result, few farmers had to travel more
+than five miles, generally on horseback, to carry their bags of grain to
+the mill. If the farmer had no horse, he had to carry his sack of
+grain on his shoulder. If the settler lived on or near a stream, he
+put his sacks of grain in a canoe and paddled downstream to the
+nearest mill. In the early days before the mills, the grain was pounded
+into meal by using a heavy pestle and a hollowed-out stump, a crude
+mortar which served the purpose.</p>
+
+<p>In time, the gristmill owners also operated distilleries, converting
+the pioneer's wheat, rye, and barley into spirited beverages which
+were freely imbibed along this and other frontiers. By the time of
+the Revolution, distilling was so common as to cause the Committee
+of Safety to take action to conserve the grain.<a name="FNanchor_30_160" id="FNanchor_30_160"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_160" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> "Home brew," however,
+was quite the custom, and it was not long before most farmers
+operated their own stills.</p>
+
+<p>Self-sufficiency was both a characteristic and a necessity among these
+Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers of central Pennsylvania.
+Bringing their agrarian traditions with them from the "old country,"
+where they had operated small farms, they were bound to a "subsistence
+farming" existence by the inaccessibility of markets to the
+frontier. One diarist found this conducive to a "perfect Independence"
+which made a "Market to them, almost unnecessary."<a name="FNanchor_31_161" id="FNanchor_31_161"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_161" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> This
+economic independence carried over into frontier manufacturing, if
+it can be called that, because the industry, except for the gristmills
+and their distilleries, was strictly domestic.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span></p>
+<p>It has often been said that the frontier farmer was a "jack-of-all
+trades," and the West Branch settler of the Fair Play territory was
+a typical example. With no market of skilled labor, or any other
+market for that matter,<a name="FNanchor_32_162" id="FNanchor_32_162"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_162" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> he was his own carpenter, cooper, shoe-maker,
+tailor, and blacksmith. Whatever he wanted or needed had to
+be made in his own home. Thus, frontier industry was of the
+handicraft or domestic type, with tasks apportioned among the various
+members of the family in accordance with their sex and talent.
+It was truly a "complete little world" in which the pioneer family
+supplied its every demand by its own efforts.<a name="FNanchor_33_163" id="FNanchor_33_163"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_163" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
+
+<p>Although the role of the women was to take on status significance
+as the frontier areas became more stable, in the earlier years of settlement
+their tasks were extensive and varied. Though they were busy
+with household duties such as churning butter, making soap, pouring
+candles, quilting, and weaving cloth for the family's clothing, it
+was not uncommon for the women to join the men in the field at
+harvesttime. The domesticity of the American housewife may be
+one impact on American life made by the Germans.<a name="FNanchor_34_164" id="FNanchor_34_164"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_164" class="fnanchor">[34]</a></p>
+
+<p>The children, too, were important persons in the economic life of
+the frontier family. Their labors lightened the load for both father
+and mother. With no available labor market from which to draw
+farm hands and household help, it was both necessary and useful to
+give the boys and girls a vocational apprenticeship in farming or
+homemaking. The girls' responsibilities were usually, although not
+exclusively, related to the hearth; the efforts of the boys were generally
+confined to the field and the implements employed there, although
+they did service too as household handymen, hauling wood, making
+fires, and the like.<a name="FNanchor_35_165" id="FNanchor_35_165"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_165" class="fnanchor">[35]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span></p>
+<p>In addition to their farming and domestic industry, the other economic
+activities of these agrarian pioneers included the care of their
+livestock and the exploitation of the available natural resources in
+their subsistence pattern of living. The tax lists for Northumberland
+County indicate the possession of two or three horses and a like number
+of cows for each head of a household.<a name="FNanchor_36_166" id="FNanchor_36_166"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_166" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> There were also "various
+Breeds of Hogs" although they were not listed by the tax
+assessor.<a name="FNanchor_37_167" id="FNanchor_37_167"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_167" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> Mr. Davy's comment that "Sheep are not well understood
+... often destroyed by the Wolves ... few ... except [those] of good
+Capital keep them" may explain their absence from these same assessments.<a name="FNanchor_38_168" id="FNanchor_38_168"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_168" class="fnanchor">[38]</a></p>
+
+<p>Maple syrup provided the sugar supply, a fact noted by land speculators
+who touted this "Country Abounding in the Sugar Tree."<a name="FNanchor_39_169" id="FNanchor_39_169"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_169" class="fnanchor">[39]</a>
+Anti-slave interests later thought that maple sugar would replace the
+slave-produced cane sugar.<a name="FNanchor_40_170" id="FNanchor_40_170"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_170" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> Mr. Davy described the process as he
+observed it at Muncy:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>The Maple Trees yield about 5 w of Sugar each on an
+average annually, some give as much as 15 ws but these are
+rare. It is drawn off in April &amp; May by boring holes in the
+Tree into which Quills &amp; Canes are introduced to convey
+the Juice to a Trough placed round the bottom of it. This
+juice is boiled down to Sugar &amp; clarified with very little
+trouble &amp; is very good.<a name="FNanchor_41_171" id="FNanchor_41_171"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_171" class="fnanchor">[41]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Honey also existed in great quantities in the area and was used
+extensively. Apparently the "sweet tooth" of the West Branch settlers
+was well satisfied by the ample resources for saccharine products.</p>
+
+<p>The trade and commerce of the West Branch Valley were strictly
+confined to its own locale. Mountain barriers, limited transportation
+facilities, and insufficient contact with the settled areas of the Province
+only served to heighten the essential self-sufficiency of the Fair Play
+settlers. The result was an economic independence which doubtless
+had its political manifestations.<a name="FNanchor_42_172" id="FNanchor_42_172"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_172" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span></p>
+<p>Economic conditions have their political implications, but it was
+the total impact of the frontier and not simply the commercial
+restrictions of some outside authority which made the Fair Play settlers
+self-reliant and independent "subsistence" farmers. The farmers'
+frontier did not result from the impact of any particular national
+stock groups, for Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers reacted
+similarly. As the most recent historian of the Scotch-Irish, the most
+numerical national stock on this frontier, suggests, "authentically
+democratic principles, when the Scotch-Irish exhibited them in America,
+were rather the result of their experiences on colonial frontiers
+than the product of the Scottish and Ulster heritage."<a name="FNanchor_43_173" id="FNanchor_43_173"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_173" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> The farmers'
+frontier with its characteristics of individualistic self-reliance was
+a product of the frontier itself.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_131" id="Footnote_1_131"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_131"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, p. 18.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_132" id="Footnote_2_132"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_132"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Henry Bamford Parkes, <i>The American Experience</i> (New York, 1959), p. 44.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_133" id="Footnote_3_133"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_133"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, p. 59.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_134" id="Footnote_4_134"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_134"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Paul A. W. Wallace, <i>Indian Paths of Pennsylvania</i> (Harrisburg, 1965), pp. 66-72,
+includes two maps.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_135" id="Footnote_5_135"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_135"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Chester D. Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," <i>The Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, VII (1935), 18.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_136" id="Footnote_6_136"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_136"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 400.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_137" id="Footnote_7_137"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_137"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 401.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_138" id="Footnote_8_138"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_138"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 472.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_139" id="Footnote_9_139"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_139"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 401.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_140" id="Footnote_10_140"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_140"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1857), p. 454.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_141" id="Footnote_11_141"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_141"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 458</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_142" id="Footnote_12_142"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_142"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, <i>Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in the Age
+of Franklin</i> (New York, 1962), p. 76.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_143" id="Footnote_13_143"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_143"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> Barck and Lefler, <i>Colonial America</i>, p. 409.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_144" id="Footnote_14_144"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_144"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Walter Prescott Webb, <i>The Great Plains</i> (New York, 1931), pp. 238-244.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_145" id="Footnote_15_145"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_145"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Herbert H. Beck, "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania Rifle,"
+<i>Papers Read Before The Lancaster County Historical Society</i>, LIII (1949), 33-61.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_146" id="Footnote_16_146"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_146"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 19.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_147" id="Footnote_17_147"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_147"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Lewis E. Theiss, "Early Agriculture," <i>Susquehanna Tales</i> (Sunbury, 1955),
+p. 89.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_148" id="Footnote_18_148"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_148"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Norman B. Wilkinson (ed.), "Mr. Davy's Diary," <i>Pennsylvania History</i>, XX
+(1953), 261.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_149" id="Footnote_19_149"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_149"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> James W. Silver (ed.), "Chauncey Brockway, an Autobiographical Sketch,"
+<i>Pennsylvania History</i>, XXV (1958), 143.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_150" id="Footnote_20_150"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_150"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Maynard, <i>Historical View of Clinton County</i>, p. 11.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_151" id="Footnote_21_151"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_151"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_152" id="Footnote_22_152"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_152"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> The probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties, found in the
+respective offices of the Register of Wills and Recorder of Deeds, contain entries
+leaving to the widow the "best room in the house," or, "her choice of rooms." No
+doubt, the simplicity of the earlier home accentuated the value of the additions.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_153" id="Footnote_23_153"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_153"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_154" id="Footnote_24_154"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_154"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 341. The Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian notes the richness of the
+land in the journal of his one-week visit to the area in the summer of 1775. He was
+also surprised to find that "many have their Grain yet in the Field," a notation
+for the 26th of July. <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, p. 71.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_155" id="Footnote_25_155"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_155"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Theiss, <i>Susquehanna Tales</i>, p. 88.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_156" id="Footnote_26_156"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_156"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> The Museum of the Muncy Historical Society contains examples of these early
+farm implements and offers vivid evidence of their crudeness.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_157" id="Footnote_27_157"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_157"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, p. 71.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_158" id="Footnote_28_158"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_158"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 72.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_159" id="Footnote_29_159"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_159"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 262.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_160" id="Footnote_30_160"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_160"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 469.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_161" id="Footnote_31_161"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_161"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 258.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_162" id="Footnote_32_162"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_162"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, p. 171. Even in the more
+settled areas of the Susquehanna Valley markets were slow to develop as this note
+from "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 338, reported on Oct. 3, 1794: "At present there is no
+Market here but if many English Families settle this will soon follow as there is
+an excellent supply of every necessary &amp; even Luxury in the Neighbourhood."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_163" id="Footnote_33_163"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_163"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, <i>Pioneer Life in Western Pennsylvania</i> (Pittsburgh,
+1940), p. 74.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_164" id="Footnote_34_164"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_164"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> Arthur W. Calhoun, <i>A Social History of the American Family</i> (New York,
+1960), I, 202.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_165" id="Footnote_35_165"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_165"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Wright and Corbett, <i>Pioneer Life in Western Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 86-92.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_166" id="Footnote_36_166"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_166"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 405-805.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_167" id="Footnote_37_167"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_167"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 265.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_168" id="Footnote_38_168"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_168"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_169" id="Footnote_39_169"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_169"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, pp. 263-264.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_170" id="Footnote_40_170"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_170"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 264.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_171" id="Footnote_41_171"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_171"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 263.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_172" id="Footnote_42_172"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_172"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> One student of the commerce of the Susquehanna Valley made sweeping generalizations
+about its significance which can hardly be substantiated. <i>See</i> Morris K.
+Turner, <i>The Commercial Relations of the Susquehanna Valley During the Colonial
+Period</i> (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1916). This dissertation, although
+claiming to deal with the Susquehanna Valley, never gets much beyond Harrisburg
+and seldom reaches as far north as Fort Augusta. Its accounts of roads, navigation
+improvements, and trade fail to reach the Fair Play settlers. This lends further
+support to their independent and self-sufficient existence. Turner's concluding
+paragraph is, however, a gem of economic determinism and bears repeating in full.
+Found on page 100, it reads as follows:
+</p><p>
+"If then, the commercial relations of the Susquehanna Valley were so far reaching
+affecting as they did in the pre-Revolutionary period the attitude of the people on
+all the questions, practically, of the day it is only fair to say that it was these
+relations which promoted the Revolution in the Province and drove the old government
+out of existence. The political issues were aided and abetted, yes, were created,
+were born from the womb of the neglected commercial relations of the Province
+and no other section at the time had such extensive relations as the Susquehanna
+Valley. No other conclusion can be reached after a serious study of the history
+of the period."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_173" id="Footnote_43_173"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_173"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 150.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_FIVE" id="CHAPTER_FIVE"></a><small>CHAPTER FIVE</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>Fair Play Society</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>The society of the Fair Play territory, between the year 1769
+and 1784, was indeed simple. There were no towns or population
+clusters, either in the territory or within a range of some
+thirty-five or forty miles. Furthermore, as we have already noted,
+transportation and communication facilities were so limited as to make
+contact with the "outside world" an exception rather than the rule.
+As we have also seen, economic functions on this farmers' frontier were
+not highly specialized. Even the political system, with its tribunal
+of Fair Play men, operated without the benefit of any formal code.</p>
+
+<p>But it would be easy, from these indications, to magnify the simplicity
+of the social structure and of social relationships in the West
+Branch Valley. If we are to consider the development of democracy
+on this frontier, we must take into account the various national stock
+groups who settled this area and, in so doing, weigh their relative
+economic and social status, the amount of intermarriage between
+them, and the ease and frequency with which they visited each other.
+These and other social relationships, such as their joint participation
+in voluntary associations, their prejudices and conflicts, and the assimilation
+of alien groups, must all be evaluated. The leadership, the
+existence of social classes, and the family patterns must, of necessity,
+be a part of our inquiry. And finally, the religious institutions, the
+educational and cultural opportunities, and the system of values have
+to be considered in arriving at a judgment regarding the democratic
+nature of Fair Play society.</p>
+
+<p>Fair Play society was composed of Scotch-Irish (48.75 per cent),
+English (20 per cent), German (15 per cent), Scots (6.25 per cent),
+Irish (5 per cent), Welsh (2.5 per cent) and French (2.5 per cent)
+settlers.<a name="FNanchor_1_174" id="FNanchor_1_174"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_174" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> Due to the pioneering conditions under which all of these
+national stock groups developed their "improvements," economic
+privilege was rather difficult to attain. Furthermore, even after the
+legislature granted pre-emption in the act of December, 1784, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span>
+grants were limited to 300 acres.<a name="FNanchor_2_175" id="FNanchor_2_175"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_175" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> In consequence of this, massive holdings
+were impossible to maintain legally, as the customary holdings of
+two to three hundred acres indicate in the tax lists for the years after
+1784.<a name="FNanchor_3_176" id="FNanchor_3_176"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_176" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> In fact, the tax lists suggest that absentee-owners or persons
+outside the actual geographic limits of the Fair Play territory who
+participated with the Fair Play settlers were the only ones to possess
+700 to 1,000 acres or more.<a name="FNanchor_4_177" id="FNanchor_4_177"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_177" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> This fact, combined with the "subsistence
+farming" which all of the area settlers pursued, suggests a relatively
+comparable economic status for the members of the Fair Play society.
+Consequently, social status was not necessarily dependent upon economic
+status.</p>
+
+<p>Social status on this frontier depended more upon achieved status
+than ascribed status. This may have been an influence of the Scotch-Irish,
+who judged, and thus classified, a neighbor by the size and
+condition of his dwelling, the care of his farm, the work done by the
+women in the family, his personal characteristics and morality, and his
+diversions.<a name="FNanchor_5_178" id="FNanchor_5_178"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_178" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> Journalists, pension claimants, and the operative, although
+unwritten, code of the Fair Play men all give corroborative evidence
+in this regard.<a name="FNanchor_6_179" id="FNanchor_6_179"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_179" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> Of all these criteria, personal character and morality
+seemed to have been most important. The Scotch-Irish, who, like the
+people of other national stocks, accepted social classes as the right
+ordering of society, shifted their emphasis, as a result of the frontier
+experience, from family heritage to individual achievement.<a name="FNanchor_7_180" id="FNanchor_7_180"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_180" class="fnanchor">[7]</a></p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span></p><p>Intermarriages provide a further key to the social relationships of
+the Fair Play settlers. If a small sample is any indication, the cases
+of intermarriages among the various national stock groups were
+relatively high, with better than one-third of the marriages sampled
+falling within this classification.<a name="FNanchor_8_181" id="FNanchor_8_181"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_181" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> The fact that the Scotch-Irish frequently
+married within their own group was probably due to their
+being more "available" in terms of numbers. Industry and good character
+were the prime criteria for selecting a frontier mate, as Dunaway
+points out.<a name="FNanchor_9_182" id="FNanchor_9_182"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_182" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>The ease and frequency of neighborly visits is vividly demonstrated
+in the characteristically cooperative cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, cornhuskings
+and similar activities in which joint effort was usual. The
+women, too, exchanged visits and, on occasion, gathered at one place
+for quilting or other mutually shared activities.<a name="FNanchor_10_183" id="FNanchor_10_183"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_183" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> Furthermore, the
+frontier journalists often noted the fine hospitality and congeniality
+of their backwoods hosts.<a name="FNanchor_11_184" id="FNanchor_11_184"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_184" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+<p>Further evidence of the egalitarian influence of this frontier is
+found in the joint participation of Fair Play settlers in voluntary associations.<a name="FNanchor_12_185" id="FNanchor_12_185"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_185" class="fnanchor">[12]</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span>
+This is particularly noticeable in their attendance at
+outdoor sermons and involvement in the various political activities.
+At a time when fewer than 100 families lived in the territory, Fithian
+observed that "There were present about an Hundred &amp; forty" people
+for a sermon which he gave on the banks of the Susquehanna, opposite
+the present city of Lock Haven, on Sunday, July 30, 1775.<a name="FNanchor_13_186" id="FNanchor_13_186"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_186" class="fnanchor">[13]</a>
+Although William Colbert, a Methodist, later "preached to a large
+congregation of willing hearers" within the territory, he did not think
+that it was "worth the preachers while to stop here."<a name="FNanchor_14_187" id="FNanchor_14_187"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_187" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> This may
+have been due to the fact that they were mainly Presbyterians. Colbert's
+reception was apparently fair for he makes a point of saying,
+"I know not that there is a prejudiced person among them."<a name="FNanchor_15_188" id="FNanchor_15_188"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_188" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> No
+regular church was established in this region until 1792, so it appears
+that the settlers generally participated in group religious activities
+regardless of the denominational affiliation of the preacher conducting
+the services. However, as we will point out later, this is not to
+suggest that there was no friction between denominations.</p>
+
+<p>The political activities of the Fair Play settlers demonstrate the
+mass participation, at least of the adult males, in this type of voluntary
+association. The annual elections of the Fair Play men were
+conducted without discrimination against any of the settlers by reason
+of religion, national origin, or property. In addition, the decisions
+of the tribunal were carried out, as Smith reports, "by the
+whole body, who started up in mass, at the mandate of the court."<a name="FNanchor_16_189" id="FNanchor_16_189"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_189" class="fnanchor">[16]</a>
+Special occasions, such as the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span>
+were also marked by the participation <i>en masse</i> of these West Branch
+pioneers. Mrs. Hamilton, in her widow's pension application, speaks
+of "seeing such numbers flocking there" (along the banks of Pine
+Creek in July of 1776).<a name="FNanchor_17_190" id="FNanchor_17_190"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_190" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> Apparently, as Mrs. Hamilton says, most of
+the settlers "had a knolege of what was doing," particularly with
+regard to political affairs.<a name="FNanchor_18_191" id="FNanchor_18_191"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_191" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p>
+
+<p>These evidences of group participation in religious and political
+activities should not mislead one into thinking that conflict, legal or
+otherwise, was alien to the West Branch frontiersmen. The cases
+brought before the Fair Play "court" and the friction between Methodists
+and Presbyterians affirm this strife. The first settler in the territory,
+Cleary Campbell, was an almost constant litigant, both as
+plaintiff and defendant, in the Northumberland County Court from
+the time of his arrival in 1769.<a name="FNanchor_19_192" id="FNanchor_19_192"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_192" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> His name, along with the names
+of other Fair Play settlers, appeared regularly on the Appearance
+Dockets of the Northumberland and Lycoming County courts. The
+cases usually involved land titles and personal obligations or debts.</p>
+
+<p>The religious conflict is clearly seen in the journal of the Reverend
+William Colbert. An incident which occurred about twenty miles
+south of the West Branch illustrates this friction:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>This is a town [present-day Milton] with three stores,
+three taverns, two ball allies. Agreeable to its size it appears
+to be one of the most dissipated places I ever saw. I could
+not tell how to pass them&mdash;I inquired at one of the ball allies
+if preaching was expected&mdash;A religious old Presbyterian
+standing by where they were playing answered that he did
+not know. I then asked them that were playing ball, they answered
+no. I farther asked them if they did not think they
+would be better employed hearing preaching than playing
+ball. Their answer was a laugh, that there was time for all
+things and that they went to preachings on Sundays. I told
+them they would not be willing to go to judgment from that
+exercise&mdash;they said they ventured that. So after a little conversation
+with the old man I left them ripening for destruction....<a name="FNanchor_20_193" id="FNanchor_20_193"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_193" class="fnanchor">[20]</a></p></div>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span></p>
+<p>Colbert's journal is filled with snide remarks and caustic comments
+about Presbyterians in general and Calvinist doctrines in particular.<a name="FNanchor_21_194" id="FNanchor_21_194"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_194" class="fnanchor">[21]</a>
+He was especially concerned for the "lost souls" of the Presbyterians
+of the West Branch Valley. A twentieth-century theologian suggests
+that Presbyterian dogmatism had driven the Scotch-Irish to the frontier;
+this same problem complicated their social relationships in the
+backwoods country.<a name="FNanchor_22_195" id="FNanchor_22_195"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_195" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p>
+
+<p>The process of acculturation of the frontier was marked by the impact
+of the aborigines upon the new white settlers in terms of the
+developing style of life in the West Branch Valley. In fact, the culture
+of the Indian may have affected the white settlers more than
+theirs affected that of the Indian. For instance, Mr. Davy says that
+"the Dress &amp; manners of the People more nearly assimilate to those
+of the Indians than lower down, but the purest English Language is
+universally spoken."<a name="FNanchor_23_196" id="FNanchor_23_196"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_196" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p>
+
+<p>The West Branch Valley was a new world whose experiences made
+new men, rather than a transplanted old world with its emphasis on
+heritage and tradition.<a name="FNanchor_24_197" id="FNanchor_24_197"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_197" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> However, the English language and Scots
+Presbyterianism were basic ingredients in the melting pot of this and
+other frontiers where the American character emerged.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span></p>
+<p>The social class structure of Fair Play society is rather difficult to
+assess. Extensive land holdings and material possessions were not
+characteristic of these "squatter" settlements. Consequently, property
+was not the distinguishing factor in stratifying the social levels of the
+Fair Play community. Furthermore, there was no slave population
+or indentured servant class to be confined to the lowest rung of the
+social ladder. Here, each man either owned his "improvement" or operated
+under some condition of tenancy. However, both indentured
+servitude and Negro slavery existed in the "New Purchase" of 1768
+in nearby Muncy.<a name="FNanchor_25_198" id="FNanchor_25_198"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_198" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> Thus, it was a two-class pattern, in the main, which
+constituted the Fair Play society&mdash;landholders and tenants. In addition,
+though, there was a further delineation within the landholding
+class on the basis of character and morality. This characteristically
+Scotch-Irish differentiation may have been due to the predominance
+of the Ulsterites in the West Branch population.<a name="FNanchor_26_199" id="FNanchor_26_199"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_199" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> In consideration
+of this fact, a three-class structure, consisting of an elite, other landholders,
+and tenants, would best describe the social class system of the
+Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>The elite of the Fair Play society were generally the political and
+economic leaders as well. They owned the "forts," operated the gristmills,
+and held the prominent political positions in the vicinity. Surprisingly
+enough, though, they frequently resided on the fringe areas
+of the territory and were thus able to acquire more land.<a name="FNanchor_27_200" id="FNanchor_27_200"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_200" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> A fuller
+description of this elite and its leadership is given in the next chapter.</p>
+
+<p>The frontier family was undoubtedly the key social institution in
+transmitting this new "American" culture to subsequent generations.
+Regardless of national origin, the families were closely-knit, well-disciplined
+units, whose members formed rather complete social and
+economic entities. As we have already noted, the agrarian family had
+its own division of labor, with each member carrying out his assigned
+tasks and, at the same time, learning the practices and procedures<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span>
+of the farmers' frontier. It was also the cultural and educational
+core, in which its members learned their faith, received their education,
+and acquired the values which would serve them throughout
+their lives. Family loyalty was a marked characteristic on the frontier
+and, incidentally, among the Scotch-Irish. The woman's lot was
+severe but she accepted it with a submissiveness which can still be
+seen in some backcountry areas of Pennsylvania today.<a name="FNanchor_28_201" id="FNanchor_28_201"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_201" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> Clannish
+and dependent upon each other, the frontier family had no use for
+divorce, which was practically unknown.<a name="FNanchor_29_202" id="FNanchor_29_202"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_202" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> If the patterns and values
+of these frontier families tended to approximate those of the Scotch-Irish
+in particular, and they did, it was because the Scotch-Irish were
+representative rather than unique.<a name="FNanchor_30_203" id="FNanchor_30_203"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_203" class="fnanchor">[30]</a></p>
+
+<p>The church was probably the second most important social institution
+in developing a system of values and a "style of life" in the
+Fair Play territory. Here again, the Scotch-Irish with their Presbyterianism
+provided the most significant influence, and ultimately the
+first regular church&mdash;although Methodists, such as Colbert, found little
+to favor in Calvinism. Almost without exception, the wills probated
+in the courts of Northumberland and Lycoming counties
+between 1772 and 1830 asked for burial "in a decent and Christian
+like manner," and committed the departed soul to "the Creator." A
+Christian life and a Christian burial were valued in this frontier society.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Due to the absence of regular churches, religious instruction was
+primarily carried on by mothers "abel to instruct," as Mrs. Hamilton
+put it.<a name="FNanchor_31_204" id="FNanchor_31_204"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_204" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> Prayer, the reading of the Bible, and a rudimentary catechism
+were all a part of this home worship, conducted by one or both
+parents. Baptism and other sacraments of the church were provided by
+itinerant pastors who made their "rounds" through the valley. Presbyterians
+and, later, Methodists developed the practice of gathering
+together in their cabins in "praying societies."<a name="FNanchor_32_205" id="FNanchor_32_205"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_205" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> Originally consisting
+of neighbor groups, these societies, in time, took in areas consisting of
+several miles.<a name="FNanchor_33_206" id="FNanchor_33_206"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_206" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
+
+<p>Itinerant pastors began to include the Fair Play territory in their
+travels in the decade of the 1770's. Philip Vickers Fithian learned
+from his host, Squire Fleming, that he was the first "orderly" preacher
+in the area.<a name="FNanchor_34_207" id="FNanchor_34_207"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_207" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> Fithian's visit came about after he obtained an honorable
+dismissal from the first Philadelphia Presbytery&mdash;as no vacancies
+existed&mdash;in order to preach outside its bounds.<a name="FNanchor_35_208" id="FNanchor_35_208"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_208" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> Although in the territory
+for only one week in the summer of 1775, Fithian's account of
+his Sunday sermon on the banks of the Susquehanna clearly describes
+the nature of wilderness preaching:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>At eleven I began Service. We crossed over to the Indian
+Land, &amp; held Worship on the Bank of the River, opposite to
+the Great Island, about a Mile &amp; a half below 'Squire Fleming's.
+There were present about an Hundred &amp; forty; I stood
+at the Root of a great Tree, &amp; the People sitting in the Bushes,
+&amp; green Grass round me.</p>
+
+<p>They gave great Attention. I had the Eyes of all upon me.
+I spoke with some Force, &amp; pretty loud. I recommended to
+them earnestly the religious Observation of God's Sabbaths,
+in this remote Place, where they seldom have the Gospel
+preached&mdash;that they should attend with Carefulness &amp; Reverence
+upon it when it is among them&mdash;And that they ought
+to strive to have it established here.<a name="FNanchor_36_209" id="FNanchor_36_209"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_209" class="fnanchor">[36]</a></p></div>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span></p><p>Fithian's recommendation was not carried out until 1792, when the
+Pine Creek Church was organized under the historic "independence"
+elm with Robert Love and a Mr. Culbertson as the first elders.<a name="FNanchor_37_210" id="FNanchor_37_210"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_210" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> This
+church, along with the Lycoming Church, which was formed in the
+eastern part of the former Fair Play territory in October of that same
+year, was served by the Reverend Isaac Grier, who was called to serve
+Lycoming Creek, Pine Creek, and the Great Island, and ordained and
+installed by the Carlisle Presbytery, April 9, 1794.<a name="FNanchor_38_211" id="FNanchor_38_211"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_211" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> He thus became
+the first regularly installed pastor in what had been the Fair Play
+territory.</p>
+
+<p>It was not until 1811 that the Presbyterian General Assembly organized
+the Northumberland Presbytery, which serves West Branch
+Valley Presbyterians to this day. In the days of the Fair Play system
+the area was assigned to Donegal Presbytery, although in 1786 the
+Carlisle Presbytery was formed out of the western part of Donegal.<a name="FNanchor_39_212" id="FNanchor_39_212"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_212" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p>
+
+<p>Missionary efforts of Presbyterians in the Fair Play territory go all
+the way back to September of 1746, when the Reverend David Brainerd
+preached to the Indians of the Great Island.<a name="FNanchor_40_213" id="FNanchor_40_213"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_213" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> But from that time
+until the opening of the West Branch Valley to settlement, following
+the first treaty at Fort Stanwix, nothing concerning the area appears
+on presbytery records. However, after the treaty one Presbyterian
+minister, the Reverend Francis Alison, pastor of the First Presbyterian
+Church of Philadelphia and vice-provost of the College of Philadelphia,
+applied for land above the mouth of Bald Eagle Creek and was
+granted some 1,500 acres.<a name="FNanchor_41_214" id="FNanchor_41_214"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_214" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> Alison never came into the region and, in
+fact, sold his entire purchase to John Fleming in 1773.<a name="FNanchor_42_215" id="FNanchor_42_215"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_215" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>
+
+<p>Although Fithian was the first "orderly" preacher assigned to the
+West Branch, the Donegal Presbytery had received an application
+from "setlers upon the W. Branch of Susquehannah" for ministerial
+supplies (pastors) in the middle of April, 1772.<a name="FNanchor_43_216" id="FNanchor_43_216"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_216" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> Apparently these
+supplies never reached north of present-day Lewisburg.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span></p>
+<p>Presbyterianism, then, was the most significant religious influence
+in the Fair Play territory. Methodists and Baptists penetrated the region
+after the Revolution, but that penetration, although marked by
+some conflict, was not vital to the development of a system of values
+on this frontier during the period under study.<a name="FNanchor_44_217" id="FNanchor_44_217"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_217" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> Furthermore, it was
+not until well into the nineteenth century that other Protestant sects
+established churches in the West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>The extent of that influence and the nature of this frontier faith
+were central to the development of Fair Play society. Since there were
+no organized churches in the area, the family was the key agency of
+religious instruction and service. This fact, combined with the impact
+of the Great Awakening, led to the freeing of the individual from the
+communal covenant, resulting in a secularization of religion which
+culminated in a kind of "predestined freedom."<a name="FNanchor_45_218" id="FNanchor_45_218"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_218" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> Consequently, the
+political implications of American Presbyterianism, which had the
+largest church membership in colonial Pennsylvania and the strongest
+affiliation on this frontier, were demonstrated in the democratic radicalism
+which the frontier spawned. Political maturity, that is to say,
+independence, was a logical evolution from religious emancipation.<a name="FNanchor_46_219" id="FNanchor_46_219"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_219" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></p>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span></p><p>In addition to the political implications of Presbyterianism, respect
+for education was a significant factor in the value structure of this
+frontier. The probate records of this period are filled with examples
+of the great desire to see the "children schooled," and specific educational
+instructions were often included in the wills.<a name="FNanchor_47_220" id="FNanchor_47_220"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_220" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> The Presbyterian
+emphasis upon an educated ministry suggests that this
+reverence for education may also have been an education for reverence.
+Morality, education, and political equality and freedom&mdash;these
+were the basic tenets of this frontier faith.</p>
+
+<p>Despite the high value placed upon education, the educational
+and cultural opportunities on this frontier, as on others, were extremely
+limited. Aside from home instruction and the occasional
+visit of an itinerant pastor, formal education was a luxury which
+these pioneers could not yet afford. However, earlier historians of
+the West Branch refer to the existence of a "log school" at "Sour's
+ferry" in 1774.<a name="FNanchor_48_221" id="FNanchor_48_221"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_221" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> Instruction in the "three R's," enforced with strict
+discipline, was given here a few months out of the year. A Presbyterian
+preacher who came into the region and stayed was the first
+teacher. Educational opportunity was extremely limited but education
+was highly respected.</p>
+
+<p>Books, too, were a luxury in the West Branch Valley. Although
+some of the wills of Fair Play settlers indicate the importance of
+books by mentioning them specifically, there was no common library
+from which the settlers could draw. However, Fithian's <i>Journal</i>
+contains a note that he "reviewed the 'Squires Library"; so we do<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span>
+know of at least one library in the territory. Its accessibility for
+most of these pioneers is, of course, another question.</p>
+
+<p>Frontier art was mainly functional. Its objects were generally the
+furniture, the tools and weapons, and the implements of the household.
+Individual expressions of creative talent, these items, whether
+they were designs on the rifle stock or styles of tableware, were outlets
+of artistic demonstration. Probably the most prized and picturesque
+of the frontier folk arts was the making of patchwork quilts.<a name="FNanchor_49_222" id="FNanchor_49_222"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_222" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> Although
+we have found no "Fair Play" pattern, we do know that the
+women of every frontier household sewed, and, because of the demand
+for bed quilts, every scrap was saved for the quilt-making. Colbert's
+<i>Journal</i> tells of his dining at one Richard Manning's "with a number
+of women who were quilting."<a name="FNanchor_50_223" id="FNanchor_50_223"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_223" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> Quilting parties were social events
+in the lives of these frontier women, and their <i>objets d'art</i> were fully
+discussed from patterns and designs down to the intricate techniques
+of needlecraft. Perhaps the patchwork quilt is the enduring legacy of
+frontier folk art.</p>
+
+<p>The music of the frontier was primarily vocal&mdash;the singing of hymns
+and, possibly, folk songs. Instrumental music was confined to the
+fiddle, which one Fair Play settler felt valuable enough to mention
+in his will.<a name="FNanchor_51_224" id="FNanchor_51_224"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_224" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> The fiddle also provided the musical background for
+the rollicking reels and jigs which the Scotch-Irish enjoyed so much.<a name="FNanchor_52_225" id="FNanchor_52_225"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_225" class="fnanchor">[52]</a>
+That it was a hard life is certainly true, but it had its happy moments
+and music was the source of much of that happiness.</p>
+
+<p>Medical practices throughout the frontier were primitive, to say
+the least, and the West Branch Valley was no exception. A diary of
+a minister in the Susquehanna Valley around Lancaster provides
+specific examples of the purges, blood-letting, and herb concoctions
+which the frontier settler endured in order to survive.<a name="FNanchor_53_226" id="FNanchor_53_226"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_226" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> In spite of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span>
+the liberal use of spirited stimulants, ailing frontiersmen often suffered
+violent reactions both from their illnesses and their cures.</p>
+
+<p>Although the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley doubtless
+had their own mythology and folklore, most of it was passed on by
+word of mouth; as a result, little of record remains. The Revolutionary
+pension claims are filled with tales of the courage and patriotism
+of the stouthearted men and women of this frontier. A
+frequent claim is that the measures taken to defend Fort Augusta,
+after the Great Runaway, urged by Fair Play settlers who had fled
+to that point, saved the frontier and made independence a reality.</p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the best-known story is that of the "independence elm" on
+Pine Creek. However, as a recent writer suggests, the story of the
+"Pine Creek Declaration" may refer merely to the reading of a copy
+of the national declaration rather than to a separate document drawn
+up by the inhabitants of this frontier.<a name="FNanchor_54_227" id="FNanchor_54_227"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_227" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> Mrs. Hamilton's testimony
+to the event notwithstanding, no copy of the declaration has ever
+been found.</p>
+
+<p>Another tale concerns the frequent reference to the upper Pine
+Creek area as "Beulah Land."<a name="FNanchor_55_228" id="FNanchor_55_228"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_228" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> It seems that a circuit rider singing
+hymns approached a camp up Pine Creek in the Black Forest. Later,
+asked to sing, he offered the familiar "Beulah Land." Still later, he
+met with an accident between Blackwell and Cammal resulting in
+his death. The entertained were his mourners. Subsequently, they
+kept his name alive by singing the old hymn to such an extent that
+the name "Beulah Land" became attached to this region on Pine
+Creek.</p>
+
+<p>Frontier life afforded little leisure time so that recreation was generally
+economically oriented or related to some household task. In
+addition, wrestling, foot-racing, jumping, throwing the tomahawk,
+and shooting at marks were popular sports.<a name="FNanchor_56_229" id="FNanchor_56_229"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_229" class="fnanchor">[56]</a> But drinking was
+probably the most common frontier recreation. It has been said that
+the Scotch-Irish made more whiskey and drank more of it than any
+other group.<a name="FNanchor_57_230" id="FNanchor_57_230"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_230" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> Everyone drank it, even the ministers. In fact, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span>
+tavern preceded the church as a social center in the West Branch
+Valley.<a name="FNanchor_58_231" id="FNanchor_58_231"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_231" class="fnanchor">[58]</a> Moderation, however, was the rule; excessive drinking was
+frowned upon.<a name="FNanchor_59_232" id="FNanchor_59_232"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_232" class="fnanchor">[59]</a></p>
+
+<p>The value system of Fair Play society can be analyzed in terms of
+the expressed ideals and beliefs, the conduct, and the material possessions
+of the pioneers who settled along the West Branch during
+this period. Journalists, diarists, and pension claimants offer recorded
+evidence of the ideals and beliefs of these settlers. Their actual behavior
+gives us some understanding of conduct as value. And finally,
+the probate records of the Northumberland and Lycoming County
+courts contribute some documentation concerning the material values
+of these frontier inhabitants. The result was a society dedicated to
+the idea of progress and oriented to a future of political and social
+equality and economic opportunity.</p>
+
+<p>A firm conviction concerning the right of property, that is, the
+right of individual private ownership, was developed early in the
+American experience in Virginia and Massachusetts and was reinforced
+by the experience of successive frontiers, of which the Fair
+Play territory was one. This is noted particularly in the pride in
+individual "improvements" and the vigorous assertion of property
+rights before the Fair Play tribunal and, later, in the regular courts.
+The large Scotch-Irish population on this and other frontiers characteristically
+asserted this view. Motivated by a spirit of individualism
+and the desire for a better way of life, the Fair Play settlers found
+land ownership basic to the accomplishment of their desired ends.<a name="FNanchor_60_233" id="FNanchor_60_233"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_233" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p>
+
+<p>In conjunction with the policy of private land ownership, the
+support of squatters' rights tended to emphasize the equality of
+achievement rather than that of ascription. No man's position was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span>
+ascribed in the Fair Play territory&mdash;he had to earn it. However, as
+we noted earlier, the pioneer farmer had to obtain the approval of
+his neighbors in order to settle in the area; but no evidence exists
+to show that this approval was in any way dependent upon social
+class or national origin. Furthermore, the annual election of the Fair
+Play men by the settlers, along with their rotation in office, gave a
+fair measure of political equality, which was reflected in the decisions
+of the tribunal affecting land claims.</p>
+
+<p>The hospitality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly stressed by
+the journalists who traveled in the West Branch Valley.<a name="FNanchor_61_234" id="FNanchor_61_234"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_234" class="fnanchor">[61]</a> Despite
+the limitations of rooms and furnishings, the frontier cabin was ever
+open to the weary traveler, and spirited conversation and beverages
+were always available to revive him. Good food and fine friends
+could be found on the frontier. The frontiersman took great pride
+in his hospitality. Dependent upon outside travelers for news, the
+latest remedies for ailments, and mail, the inhabitants of the frontier
+opened the doors of their cabins and their hearts to visitors. Taken
+into a home, the weary traveler often found himself treated to the
+best in food and comfort which the limitations of the frontier permitted.
+Generally sharing the one-room cabin, like any member
+of the family, he soon learned that he was a welcome guest rather
+than a stranger in their midst. The loneliness of the frontier stimulated
+the hospitality of the frontiersman.</p>
+
+<p>Although no "frontier philosophy," as such, existed, the conduct
+of its inhabitants demonstrated their faith, their patriotism, their
+spirit of mutual helpfulness, and their temperance. The pioneer
+was not a philosopher or a thinker, because the rigorous struggle for
+survival, which was his, did not permit the leisure to develop these
+traits. He was a doer whose values and beliefs were reflected in his
+behavior.</p>
+
+<p>The favorable, but not always eager, reception of itinerant pastors,
+the religious instruction which took place in the home, and the frequent
+references to "the Creator" in the wills testify to the relevance
+of faith in influencing the character and behavior of these early<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span>
+Americans. Faith was not only relevant but also a matter of choice,
+and freedom of worship was practiced on this frontier. Here again,
+the Scotch-Irish Presbyterian influence may have been significant.<a name="FNanchor_62_235" id="FNanchor_62_235"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_235" class="fnanchor">[62]</a></p>
+
+<p>Patriotism, with few exceptions, was characteristic of the frontier.
+But loyalty to what? On this frontier it seems to have meant devotion
+to an America which developed through New World experience.
+Like Topsy, "it jus' growed," and no frontiersman wanted it taken
+away. The enthusiastic reception of the Declaration of Independence
+by the Fair Play settlers combined with the legend of their own
+resolutions on the question indicate this patriotic feeling. Despite
+their political differences with the settled areas, the West Branch
+pioneers were overwhelmingly loyal to the patriot cause in the American
+Revolution.<a name="FNanchor_63_236" id="FNanchor_63_236"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_236" class="fnanchor">[63]</a> Their loyalty, however, was more to the ideal
+of freedom, or "liberty" as they termed it, than to any organization
+or state. They believed in and supported the liberty which their own
+hard work and the circumstances of the frontier had made possible.</p>
+
+<p>Mutual helpfulness was essential to survival in the wilderness and
+valued among its pioneers. Cabin-raisings, cornhuskings, harvesttime,
+and quilting parties are just a few examples of this spirit in
+action. Individualistic in his approach, the frontier farmer realized
+the need for neighborly support and appreciated its offer.</p>
+
+<p>In spite of the availability of a more-than-adequate supply of
+spirited liquid refreshment, temperance was both commended and
+respected on this Pennsylvania frontier. One historian points out
+that there was probably less drunkenness on the frontier than there
+was in eastern Pennsylvania, where it was not unusual for young men
+to get drunk at the taverns or to drink themselves under the table at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span>
+weddings or at other social functions.<a name="FNanchor_64_237" id="FNanchor_64_237"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_237" class="fnanchor">[64]</a> Drunkards were few and
+generally despised on the frontier.<a name="FNanchor_65_238" id="FNanchor_65_238"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_238" class="fnanchor">[65]</a></p>
+
+<p>Material values, in a society where possessions, beyond the land
+itself and the rude cabin built upon it, are limited, are best gleaned
+from the probate records, which listed the prized possessions of this
+frontier community. Beds and bedsteads are the items which appear
+most frequently in the wills of the Fair Play settlers. Occasionally,
+the ultimate in frontier affluence is reached in the form of a "feather
+Bed."<a name="FNanchor_66_239" id="FNanchor_66_239"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_239" class="fnanchor">[66]</a> Beds, or feather beds, and bedsteads were so highly valued
+as pieces of furniture that they were often passed on to the daughters,
+serving as a substantial part of their dowries.<a name="FNanchor_67_240" id="FNanchor_67_240"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_240" class="fnanchor">[67]</a> Surprisingly
+enough, the widow often received "the room she now sleeps in" or,
+"her choise of any one room in the house." This is not so amazing,
+however, when one realizes that additional rooms beyond the original
+one-room cabin quite logically became highly valued. Pewterware was
+the silver of the frontier, and, if the probate records are any indication,
+there was little of it and no silver. Aside from references to
+furniture such as spinning wheels, bureaus, tables, and chairs, and
+these not too regularly, it is quite evident that material possessions
+were few.</p>
+
+<p>What then was the nature of Fair Play society? The frontier, by
+its very nature, had an egalitarian influence which is readily apparent
+from this analysis of the "style of life" along the West Branch. A
+relative political and social equality existed in this land of economic
+opportunity where faith, patriotism, helpfulness, and self-determination
+were the outstanding traits. The frontier brought the democratizing
+role of achievement to the fore in American life, and the Fair
+Play settlers were an excellent example.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_174" id="Footnote_1_174"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_174"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#Page_16">Chart 1</a> in Chapter Two.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_175" id="Footnote_2_175"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_175"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_176" id="Footnote_3_176"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_176"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 557-805.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_177" id="Footnote_4_177"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_177"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> For example, in the County Assessments for 1781, <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third
+Series, XIX, 468, 484, the individual holdings of resident property owners range
+from 50 to 1,500 acres, whereas non-residents' range from 200 to 13,000. Only six
+of thirty residents showed property in excess of 325 acres and four of these had
+550 acres or less. The two large landowners were peripheral Fair Play residents.
+Subsequent tax lists indicate that non-residents eventually sold their property in
+sections.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_178" id="Footnote_5_178"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_178"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 262.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_179" id="Footnote_6_179"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_179"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i> (1775) and <i>Journal of William Colbert</i> (1792-1794). These
+journals of the first regularly assigned itinerant pastors, Presbyterian and Methodist,
+to the West Branch Valley, contain numerous references concerning the
+personal character and morality of the settlers. In the Hamilton Papers of the
+Wagner Collection of Revolutionary War pension claimants, p. 11, Mrs. Hamilton
+writes to the Honorable George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions, on Dec.
+16, 1858: "I believe they were people of clear sound mind, just, upright, morrall,
+religious, and friendly to all. I should say they came nearest to keeping the commandment,
+love your nabour as yourself, then any people I ever lived among."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_180" id="Footnote_7_180"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_180"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 269.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_181" id="Footnote_8_181"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_181"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Helen Herritt Russell, "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and Their
+Government," <i>The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and
+Addresses</i>, XXII (1958), 16-43. Mrs. Russell, whose genealogical studies were the
+basis of Chart 1 in Chapter Two, notes 24 marriages among the 80 names, 9 of which
+were intermarriages of different national stocks. Of the 24 marriages, 9 were between
+Scotch-Irish couples. Intermarriages produced 5 English-Scotch-Irish couples,
+2 German-Scotch-Irish, 1 Welsh-Scotch-Irish, and 1 German-English. The intermarriages
+appear to follow the national stock percentages in the population. This
+would suggest that the intermarriages were a matter of choice rather than of
+necessity.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_182" id="Footnote_9_182"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_182"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, p. 198.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_183" id="Footnote_10_183"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_183"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i> (1792-1794). This entry for Thursday, Sept. 5, 1793,
+is from a typescript belonging to Dr. Charles F. Berkheimer, of Williamsport.
+The original is in Chicago at the Garrett Biblical Seminary.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_184" id="Footnote_11_184"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_184"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Here again, Fithian, Colbert, and Mr. Davy all mention the friendly reception
+which was theirs on this frontier. Davy, in an entry for Oct. 10, 1794, p. 265,
+says, "In the Winter Sleighs are in general use on the Rivers &amp; on Land &amp; it is
+time of Visiting &amp; Jollity throughout the Country."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_185" id="Footnote_12_185"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_185"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, Tuesday, Aug. 21, 1792. Here the Reverend Colbert
+refers to the existence of a class in religion among the group of Presbyterians,
+although the prospects appear none too favorable. In fact, he says, "I had no
+desire to meet the class, so disordered are they, therefore omitted it." Quarterly
+meetings of Methodists were also held in the West Branch Valley, as Colbert notes
+in his journal for Saturday, Sept. 15, 1792, and Saturday, Sept. 7, 1793. In 1792,
+Colbert remarks that "Our Quarterly Meeting began at Joshua White's today."
+The following year he wrote that "brother Paynter and I have to hold a Quarterly
+meeting at Ammariah Sutton's at Lycommon." Each of these instances indicates
+the presence of some sort of voluntary religious association. However, it must be
+recalled that Fithian mentioned no such classes or meetings extant during his visit
+in July of 1775.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_186" id="Footnote_13_186"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_186"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, pp. 80-81.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_187" id="Footnote_14_187"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_187"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793, and Saturday, Aug. 18,
+1792.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_188" id="Footnote_15_188"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_188"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Tuesday, Oct. 15, 1793.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_189" id="Footnote_16_189"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_189"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_190" id="Footnote_17_190"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_190"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p. 10.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_191" id="Footnote_18_191"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_191"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_192" id="Footnote_19_192"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_192"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> <i>See</i> the Appearance Dockets Commencing in 1772 for Northumberland County
+and 1795 for Lycoming County.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_193" id="Footnote_20_193"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_193"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, Monday, June 18, 1792.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_194" id="Footnote_21_194"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_194"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Saturday, Aug. 4, 1792: "Calvinist must certainly be the most damnable
+doctrine upon the face of the globe." Sunday, July 29, 1792: "Here for telling the
+people they must live without sin, I so offended a Presbyterian, that he got up,
+called his wife and away he went." Sunday July 22, 1792: "... in the afternoon
+for the first time heard a Presbyterian at Pine Creek.... He is an able speaker
+but could not, but, Calvinistic like speak against sinless perfection." Monday, Aug.
+20, 1792: "... rode to John Hamilton's in the afternoon. Here the unhappy souls
+[Presbyterian Fair Play settlers] that were joined together in society, I fear are
+going to ruin." Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793: "I went to John Hamilton's on the Bald
+Eagle Creek spoke a few words to a few people: I do not think that is worth the
+preachers while to stop here."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_195" id="Footnote_22_195"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_195"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> F. B. Everett, "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+River," <i>Journal of the Presbyterian Historical Society</i>, XII (1927), 481. According
+to the Reverend Mr. Everett, whose article also appeared in the Montgomery <i>Mirror</i>
+for Oct. 27, 1926, the Scotch-Irish, with the Anglicans, were the dogmatists of
+Pennsylvania. The Quakers and Pietistic German sects were anti-dogmatic. Dogmatically
+adhering to his catechisms, the Scotch-Irishman "resented the aspersions
+cast upon dogma and creed." The frontier gave him freedom from the Quakers
+who still considered Presbyterians as those "who had burnt a Quaker in New England
+from the cart's tail, and had murdered other Quakers."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_196" id="Footnote_23_196"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_196"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_197" id="Footnote_24_197"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_197"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Thomas J. Wertenbaker, <i>The First Americans, 1607-1690</i> (New York, 1927).
+Wertenbaker's first chapter, "A New World Makes New Men," develops this thesis
+generally for the American colonial experience, and, as Turner said, those first
+colonies were the first frontier.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_198" id="Footnote_25_198"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_198"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," pp. 28, 63. Clark notes that indentured
+servitude appeared in Muncy, where Samuel Wallis' great holdings made
+such service feasible. He also mentions Wallis' ownership of slaves, verified by the
+Quarter Session Docket of 1778. Wallis freed two Negro slaves, Zell and Chloe,
+posting a &pound;30 bond that they would not become a charge on the township.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_199" id="Footnote_26_199"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_199"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 262. <i>See also</i> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of
+Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 180-200.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_200" id="Footnote_27_200"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_200"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> These "fringe area" participants in Fair Play society actually resided, for the
+most part, in Provincial territory and hence enjoyed greater stability and more land.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_201" id="Footnote_28_201"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_201"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Calhoun, <i>A Social History of the American Family</i>, I, 207.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_202" id="Footnote_29_202"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_202"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_203" id="Footnote_30_203"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_203"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 271. Leyburn points out that since the Scotch-Irish
+were never a "minority," in the sense that their values differed radically from
+the norms of their areas of settlement, they never suffered the normlessness which
+Durkheim calls anomie&mdash;the absence of clear standards to follow. As Leyburn states
+it,</p>
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Anomie was an experience unknown to the Scotch-Irishman, for he moved
+immediately upon arrival to a region where there was neither a settlement
+nor an established culture. He held land, knew independence, had manifold
+responsibilities from the very outset. He spoke the language of his neighbors
+to the East through whose communities he had passed on his way
+to the frontier. Their institutions and standards differed at only minor
+points from his own. The Scotch-Irish were not, in short, a "minority
+group" and needed no Immigrant Aid society to tide them over a period
+of maladjustment so that they might become assimilated in the American
+melting pot.</p></div>
+<p>This, however, is not to suggest that minorities are necessarily anomic. The Jews,
+for example, were always a cultural minority in Europe, yet they adhered intensely
+to their own cultural norms.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_204" id="Footnote_31_204"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_204"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p. 10.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_205" id="Footnote_32_205"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_205"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, <i>Pioneer Life in Western Pennsylvania</i>
+(Pittsburgh, 1940), p. 142.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_206" id="Footnote_33_206"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_206"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i> The existence of these "praying societies" is further substantiated in
+Colbert's <i>Journal</i>. During these services, lay persons gave exhortations or assisted
+Colbert in some fashion.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_207" id="Footnote_34_207"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_207"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, p. 76.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_208" id="Footnote_35_208"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_208"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Robert S. Cocks, <i>One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The History of
+Northumberland Presbytery 1811-1961</i> (n. p., 1961), p. 2.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_209" id="Footnote_36_209"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_209"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, pp. 80-81.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_210" id="Footnote_37_210"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_210"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Joseph Stevens, <i>History of the Presbytery of Northumberland, from Its Organization,
+in 1811, to May 1888</i> (Williamsport, 1888), p. 38.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_211" id="Footnote_38_211"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_211"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 18.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_212" id="Footnote_39_212"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_212"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Cocks, <i>One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism</i>, p. 2.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_213" id="Footnote_40_213"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_213"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Guy S. Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along the Susquehanna
+River," <i>Pennsylvania History</i>, XX (1953), p. 173.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_214" id="Footnote_41_214"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_214"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 174.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_215" id="Footnote_42_215"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_215"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 520.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_216" id="Footnote_43_216"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_216"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering," p. 175.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_217" id="Footnote_44_217"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_217"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, Monday, June 18, 1792; and Robert Berger, "The
+Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County," <i>Now and Then</i>, XII (1960),
+274-280. According to the Reverend Robert Berger, of Hughesville, a few Baptist
+settlers came into Lycoming County from New Jersey, but were soon driven out
+by the Indians. Apparently, the Philadelphia Baptist Association sent missionaries
+to the area in 1775 and 1778. However, not until the association commissioned
+Elders Patton, Clingan, and Vaughn in 1792 did any extensive Baptist preaching
+take place in this region. They were sent out for three months on the Juniata and
+the West Branch. The Loyalsock Baptist Church, established in 1822, is the first
+church.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_218" id="Footnote_45_218"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_218"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Dietmar Rothermund, <i>The Layman's Progress: Religious and Political Experience
+in Colonial Pennsylvania 1740-1770</i> (Philadelphia, 1961), p. 142. As
+Rothermund describes it, "The Pilgrim's progress had turned into the layman's
+emancipation, and finally into the citizen's revolution" (p. 137). He calls "the
+political maturity which followed the era of religious emancipation ... America's
+real revolutionary heritage" (p. 138).</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_46_219" id="Footnote_46_219"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_219"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 137. It must first be recognized that American Presbyterianism differed
+from that of Scotland particularly with regard to local autonomy. The
+Presbyterian Church, like the United States under the Constitution of 1787, was
+federal in its governmental structure, and the autonomy of the local religious
+institutions was later carried into politics. Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 313,
+emphasizes the fact that the Scotch-Irishman's church had accustomed him to belief
+in government by the consent of the governed, in representative and republican
+institutions. The relationship between the church covenant and the social
+compact is quite direct. If men can bind themselves together to form a church, then
+it seems quite logical that they can bind themselves together to form a government.
+Fair Play democracy was simply political Presbyterianism. Its impact has
+been noted by a number of historians. Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial
+Pennsylvania</i>, p. 135, claims that "The actual means by which Pennsylvania was
+transformed from a proprietary province into an American commonwealth was
+the new political organization developed by the Scotch-Irish in alliance with the
+eastern radical leaders of the continental Revolutionary movement. This extra-legal
+organization, consisting of the committee of safety, the provincial and county
+committees of correspondence, and the provincial conventions, supplanted the regular
+provincial government by absorbing its functions." Becker, <i>Beginning of the
+American People</i>, p. 180, calls the Scotch-Irish a people "whose religion confirmed
+them in a democratic habit of mind."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_47_220" id="Footnote_47_220"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_220"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, George Quigley's Will, p. 69.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_48_221" id="Footnote_48_221"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_221"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> Maynard, <i>Historical View of Clinton County</i>, p. 208.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_49_222" id="Footnote_49_222"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_222"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> Carrie A. Hall and Rose G. Kretsinger, <i>The Romance of the Patchwork Quilt
+in America</i> (New York, 1935), p. 27.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_50_223" id="Footnote_50_223"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_223"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, Thursday, Sept. 5, 1793.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_51_224" id="Footnote_51_224"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_224"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, William Chatham's Will, p. 177.
+Chatham's bequest is "To Robert Devling My Fidel."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_52_225" id="Footnote_52_225"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_225"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, p. 196.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_53_226" id="Footnote_53_226"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_226"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary (1716-1791), microfilm transcript, 2 rolls,
+Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg. An example, found
+on p. 252, is this "<i>famous American Receipt for the Rheumatism</i>. Take of
+garlic two cloves, of gum ammoniac, one drachm; blend them by bruising together.
+Make them into two or three bolus's with fair water and swallow one
+at night and the other in the morning. Drink strong sassafras tea while using
+these. It banishes also contractions of the joints. 100 pounds been given for this."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_54_227" id="Footnote_54_227"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_227"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> Rebecca F. Gross, "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven <i>Express</i>, Aug. 3, 1963,
+p. 4.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_55_228" id="Footnote_55_228"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_228"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," <i>Now and Then</i>,
+VIII (1947), 257-258.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_56_229" id="Footnote_56_229"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_229"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, p. 193.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_57_230" id="Footnote_57_230"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_230"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 197.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_58_231" id="Footnote_58_231"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_231"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222. Mrs. Coldren refers to a tavern,
+just west of Chatham's Run, in the spring of 1775. The first church appeared in
+1792.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_59_232" id="Footnote_59_232"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_232"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," <i>Now and Then</i>, X (1954), 307. The diarist
+tells of a tavernkeeper who refused a man a pint of wine because "he had had
+enough" (Thursday, July 24, 1794).</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_60_233" id="Footnote_60_233"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_233"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, pp. 148-150. Leyburn suggests, and the Fair Play
+settlers demonstrate, that Ulster and America were similar experiences. He says
+(p. 148) that the Scotch-Irish "lived on land in both regions often forcibly taken
+from the natives. The confiscation itself was declared legal by the authorities, and
+the actual settlement was made in the conviction that the land was now rightfully
+theirs. Might makes right&mdash;at least in the matter of life and land ownership."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_61_234" id="Footnote_61_234"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_234"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, the <i>Journal of William Colbert</i>, and "Mr. Davy's Diary" all
+refer to the hospitality of the people of this frontier. For example, Fithian speaks
+of his hosts as "sociable, kind"; while Colbert constantly mentions the "liberty"
+which he enjoyed in the various homes which he visited.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_62_235" id="Footnote_62_235"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_235"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, pp. 146-147. Leyburn suggests that belief in the
+superiority of the Presbyterian church to any king justifies revolt; if one may,
+others may, leading to anarchy. Thus freedom of worship for a minority allied
+itself in America with liberty of worship for all. The right of revolution, as it
+was acted upon in America, was also implied.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_63_236" id="Footnote_63_236"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_236"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> Loyalists in the West Branch Valley suffered the usual privations as this excerpt
+from the "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310, indicates: "<i>Thursday,
+July 24, 1794</i>.... Mr. Witteker and his family are of the people called Quakers
+but was turned out of the society during the time of war for paing the money
+called substitute [relief from the draft]* money to the Congress agents. M[r].
+W's case is really hard. He suffered as above by his friends for aiding Congress
+and his estate was conviscated [<i>sic</i>] by the state for being a loyalist." [*Phrase bracketed in quotation.]</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_64_237" id="Footnote_64_237"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_237"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 197-198.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_65_238" id="Footnote_65_238"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_238"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 198. An example of this attitude is found in this entry in the "Diary
+of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310: "This afternoon 24 July [1794] a person with
+two horses, one he rode, the other lead, called at Wittekers for a pint of wine,
+but on account of him being intoxicated before Mr. W. told him he had had
+enough &amp; would not let him have any. Where could we find so disinterested a
+tavernkeeper in England? In England they never refuse as long as they pay,
+but here the man had the money ready if they would let him have the wine."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_66_239" id="Footnote_66_239"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_239"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> This conclusion was reached after the reading of some three hundred wills in
+the probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties. This particular
+reference is from James Caldwell's will, Nov. 20, 1815, located in Will Book #1,
+p. 108, Lycoming County Courthouse.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_67_240" id="Footnote_67_240"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_240"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 22. Beds and feather beds
+seem to have been status symbols of a sort often willed to the wife or included
+as a dowry.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_SIX" id="CHAPTER_SIX"></a><small>CHAPTER SIX</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>Leadership and the Problems of the Frontier</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>Any analysis of democracy in the Fair Play territory must
+consider the question of leadership and the particular problems
+of that frontier. The number of leaders and their roles,
+the marks of leadership, and the circumstances which brought certain
+men to the fore must all be considered. Was there some correlation
+between property-holdings, or national origin, and leadership?
+Were there certain offices conducive to the exercise of leadership?
+The subject of leadership entails inquiry into each of these areas.</p>
+
+<p>Unfortunately, only one biographical study of any Fair Play leader
+has ever been attempted, that of Henry Antes.<a name="FNanchor_1_241" id="FNanchor_1_241"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_241" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> As a result, the patterns
+of leadership must be gleaned from court records, tax lists,
+lists of public officials, and petitions from the settlers of this frontier.
+Consequently, what follows gives us some general understanding of
+the nature of leadership but offers little in the way of insight into
+the personalities of the leaders.</p>
+
+<p>Using the Curti study as an example, certain objective criteria have
+been set up in analyzing leadership in the West Branch Valley.<a name="FNanchor_2_242" id="FNanchor_2_242"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_242" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>
+Obviously, some leaders were more important than others. Their
+influence extended beyond the limits of the Fair Play territory.
+These leaders, provided that they stood out in respect to at least
+three of the four criteria established, have been categorized as regional
+leaders. These four criteria have been used in this study to
+determine regional leadership: (1) the holding of political office,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span>
+(2) the ownership of better-than-average property holdings, (3) the
+operation of frontier forts, and (4) the holding of military rank of
+some significance.<a name="FNanchor_3_243" id="FNanchor_3_243"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_243" class="fnanchor">[3]</a></p>
+
+<p>Of these criteria, office holding appears to be the most important.
+Thus, regional leaders were generally re-elected to public office, or
+held more than one such office. Furthermore, it will be noted that
+these offices tended to be with the established governments of the
+State and county. Since some leaders never held any political office,
+another classification seemed necessary. Consequently, the role of
+local leadership was also classified.</p>
+
+<p>The influence of some men seems to have been strictly confined to
+the Fair Play territory, either by virtue of their election to some local
+office or by their prominence in some other phase of community life.
+As a result, local leaders have been considered as (1) those who
+held at least two local offices, or (2) those who exercised identifiable
+community leadership in a non-political context.</p>
+
+<p>After an extensive examination of the lists of public officials for
+Northumberland County, the tax lists for the same period, the records
+of the Fair Play men and the Committee of Safety, the accounts of
+the frontier forts in the region, and the military records of these
+settlers, it becomes evident that only three men can be considered as
+regional leaders and not more than seven or eight as local leaders.<a name="FNanchor_4_244" id="FNanchor_4_244"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_244" class="fnanchor">[4]</a>
+Henry Antes, Robert Fleming, and Frederick Antes are the regional
+leaders; and Alexander Hamilton, John Fleming, James Crawford,
+John Walker, Thomas Hughes, Cookson Long, William Reed, and
+Samuel Horn are the local leaders. Obviously, the listings are too
+limited to offer any valid quantitative analysis.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span></p>
+<p>Henry Antes is undoubtedly the single most outstanding leader in
+the entire Fair Play country. Judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions,
+sheriff, justice of the peace, Fair Play spokesman, captain (later
+colonel) of Associators and commander of Fort Antes, miller and
+property owner, personal friend of John Dickinson and other Provincial
+leaders, Henry Antes was the top figure in civic, economic, military,
+and social affairs along the West Branch. Influential within and
+without the Fair Play territory, Henry Antes was truly the major
+leader in the valley.</p>
+
+<p>The Antes family had long played a significant role in the history
+of the Province of Pennsylvania. As MacMinn relates, Henry's father,
+Henry, Sr., had been "associated with the most prominent men of
+his time in movements for the public good."<a name="FNanchor_5_245" id="FNanchor_5_245"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_245" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> A Moravian, the elder
+Antes had assisted Count Zinzendorf in his missionary efforts, aided
+Whitefield in his philanthropic endeavors, worked with Henry
+Muhlenberg in educating the German town community, and served
+with a marked impartiality as a justice of the peace.<a name="FNanchor_6_246" id="FNanchor_6_246"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_246" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> From such
+stock came the necessary leadership for the Fair Play settlers of the
+West Branch frontier.</p>
+
+<p>Born near Pottstown in Montgomery County in 1736, young Henry
+may have learned of frontier opportunity from visitors to his father's
+inn, such as Zinzendorf and Spangenburg, who had traveled along
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna. Consequently, joined by his
+brother William, he signed an article of agreement on September 29,
+1773, for the purchase of land in the West Branch Valley.<a name="FNanchor_7_247" id="FNanchor_7_247"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_247" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> When
+another brother, Frederick, obtained property in the area later in
+that same decade, the Antes brothers, particularly Henry and Frederick,
+became the dominant political, economic, and social influence in the
+territory. Frederick, however, was more of an absentee leader since
+he never actually resided in the Fair Play territory.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span></p>
+<p>Although the combined holdings of the Antes brothers constituted
+only a little less than 700 acres, their gristmill, the first in the region,
+became the meeting place for the area settlers, providing a forum for
+the usual discussions of politics and prices.<a name="FNanchor_8_248" id="FNanchor_8_248"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_248" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> From Lycoming Creek
+on the east to Pine Creek and the Great Island on the west, the
+frontier farmers brought their grain to the Antes mill, on the south
+side of the Susquehanna River opposite present Jersey Shore. While
+the milling went on, the men analyzed their common problems and
+debated the future of this pioneer land. If there was a center for
+the dissemination of news in the West Branch Valley, it was the Antes
+mill and fort, which was soon constructed on the property. Located
+in almost the center of the Fair Play territory (although actually
+across the river from it), where men met of necessity, and having had
+a father who had exerted influence and exercised leadership in Philadelphia
+County, the Antes brothers were well prepared to lead the
+West Branch pioneers.</p>
+
+<p>With their gristmill giving Henry and Frederick a decided economic
+edge, they soon became involved in the politics of the Fair
+Play territory, Northumberland County, and the Province of Pennsylvania.
+Henry became primarily a local and county leader, while
+his brother concentrated on county and Provincial and, later, State
+affairs. Both served as county judges&mdash;Henry, appointed in 1775, and
+Frederick, elected in 1784&mdash;which suggests judicial responsibility as
+the key to assuming major leadership, since Robert Fleming took
+Frederick's judicial post when he resigned to take a seat in the
+General Assembly.<a name="FNanchor_9_249" id="FNanchor_9_249"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_249" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>By the summer of 1775, when Philip Vickers Fithian first included
+the West Branch in his itinerary&mdash;the valley by then supported some
+100 families&mdash;Henry Antes had already distinguished himself as a
+public servant. He, along with five others, had been commissioned
+by the county court to lay out a road from Fort Augusta to the mouth
+of Bald Eagle Creek;<a name="FNanchor_10_250" id="FNanchor_10_250"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_250" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> he had served as a spokesman for the Fair<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span>
+Play men in a land title dispute;<a name="FNanchor_11_251" id="FNanchor_11_251"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_251" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> he had been made a justice of
+the peace;<a name="FNanchor_12_252" id="FNanchor_12_252"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_252" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> and he had been appointed as a judge of the Court of
+Quarter Sessions.<a name="FNanchor_13_253" id="FNanchor_13_253"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_253" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> This was to be only the beginning, for in 1775,
+when the Associators were organized, Henry Antes was made captain
+of company eight, embodying the Nippenose and Pine Creek settlers.<a name="FNanchor_14_254" id="FNanchor_14_254"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_254" class="fnanchor">[14]</a>
+But even this is not the complete picture, for when the settlers returned
+to the region in the eighties, following the Great Runaway of
+1778, Antes became sheriff, the chief law enforcement officer of
+Northumberland County.<a name="FNanchor_15_255" id="FNanchor_15_255"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_255" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> The popular miller had become the
+popular leader, a popularity enhanced by his interpretation of the
+sheriff's role, an interpretation which occasionally brought him into
+conflict with the State's leaders.<a name="FNanchor_16_256" id="FNanchor_16_256"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_256" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p>
+
+<p>The leadership of the Antes brothers is further accentuated by the
+activities of Frederick Antes. Between 1776 and 1784 he was a delegate
+to the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention, justice of the
+peace, president judge of the county courts, county treasurer, commissioner
+of purchase for Northumberland County, a representative
+in the General Assembly, and a colonel of militia.<a name="FNanchor_17_257" id="FNanchor_17_257"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_257" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> With Henry on
+the West Branch and Frederick frequently in Philadelphia, the Antes
+family had a constant finger on the pulse of Pennsylvania politics.
+Official duties, plus the strategic location of the Antes fort and mill,
+made Frederick and Henry Antes the most influential persons in the
+West Branch Valley during the operation of the Fair Play system.
+Eminently qualified by numerous public responsibilities, the Antes
+brothers were major leaders of the Fair Play settlers.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span></p>
+<p>Robert Fleming, the third regional leader in the territory, also
+served as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas for the county, although
+that service began in March, 1785, after the Fair Play territory
+was acquired by the State of Pennsylvania in the second Stanwix
+Treaty of 1784.<a name="FNanchor_18_258" id="FNanchor_18_258"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_258" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> He became a justice of the peace at the same time.<a name="FNanchor_19_259" id="FNanchor_19_259"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_259" class="fnanchor">[19]</a>
+Prior to his judicial obligations, Fleming had been a member of the
+county Committee of Safety, a township overseer, a representative in
+the General Assembly, a second lieutenant of Associators, and possibly
+a Fair Play man.<a name="FNanchor_20_260" id="FNanchor_20_260"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_260" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> During the Revolution, he was primarily
+concerned with the area around the Great Island, serving at Reed's
+Fort (present Lock Haven) and on the Fleming estate, which some
+referred to as Fort Fleming. Robert had a brother, John, with whom
+Fithian stayed during his brief sojourn in the territory. Their combined
+holdings, the largest in the vicinity, ran to almost 3,000 acres,
+of which 1,250 acres were Robert's.<a name="FNanchor_21_261" id="FNanchor_21_261"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_261" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p>
+
+<p>Certain conclusions can be drawn from these data regarding the
+regional leaders of the Fair Play territory. Better than average property
+holdings, extensive in the case of Robert Fleming; judicial
+responsibility, which was true of all three men; primary authority
+in frontier forts (the Antes brothers owned and commanded Antes
+Fort, and the Flemings operated their own stockade and commanded
+Fort Reed); and military rank ranging from lieutenant of Associators
+to colonel of militia: these characteristics signified major leadership
+in the West Branch Valley among the Fair Play settlers. Coincidentally,
+it can be noted that two of the three regional leaders, having
+served in the State legislature, had influence which reached to the
+State House in Philadelphia. Obviously, these men were known outside
+of the limited environs of the Fair Play territory. In fact, both
+Henry and Frederick Antes enjoyed a more than passing acquaintance
+with Benjamin Franklin and John Dickinson, two of the giants of
+this period of Pennsylvania's history.<a name="FNanchor_22_262" id="FNanchor_22_262"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_262" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span></p>
+<p>A further observation which can be made concerning leadership
+relates to the question of national origin. Although the Fair Play
+territory has often been referred to as "Scotch-Irish country," the
+German Antes brothers performed the outstanding leadership roles
+on this frontier. Also, the specific geographic location of our regional
+leaders provides a final note of interest. All three of them, Henry and
+Frederick Antes, and Robert Fleming, actually resided outside the
+limits of the Fair Play territory. They were on the geographic fringe
+but at the leadership core. Their close proximity to the Fair Play
+territory, separated from it only by the Susquehanna River, in addition
+to their contacts with and positions in established government,
+gave these men an obvious political eminence. The forts located in
+both places and the Anteses' gristmill gave both the Flemings and
+the Anteses opportunity for leadership.</p>
+
+<p>Local leaders generally lived within the Fair Play territory, had
+average property holdings, and served on either the Fair Play tribunal
+or the township Committee of Safety. There are, of course, exceptions
+to each of these generalizations. The fort operators, Samuel Horn,
+William Reed, and John Fleming, resided on the Provincial or State
+side of the Susquehanna River. Furthermore, John Fleming was the
+largest property owner in the area with some 1,640 acres.<a name="FNanchor_23_263" id="FNanchor_23_263"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_263" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> And
+one man, James Crawford, held the highly respected county office of
+sheriff.<a name="FNanchor_24_264" id="FNanchor_24_264"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_264" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p>
+
+<p>Three of the local leaders, John Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and
+James Crawford, stand out from the rest, although for different reasons.
+John Fleming undoubtedly would have become a major leader
+had he lived longer&mdash;he died in 1777. His extensive property made
+his home the usual stop for itinerant pastors and other travelers in
+the valley, as Fithian's <i>Journal</i> attests.<a name="FNanchor_25_265" id="FNanchor_25_265"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_265" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> It also made him a figure of
+central significance in economic affairs. Alexander Hamilton was
+probably "the" local leader. A member of the Committee of Safety
+and presumably a Fair Play man, he was also the captain of Horn's<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span>
+Fort.<a name="FNanchor_26_266" id="FNanchor_26_266"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_266" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> He is also the reputed author of the Pine Creek declaration.
+James Crawford was more noted for military exploits than for
+civic duties. Prior to his military service, Crawford had represented
+Northumberland County in the Constitutional Convention of 1776,
+which framed the State constitution and, later, commissioned him
+as a major in the Twelfth Pennsylvania Regiment.<a name="FNanchor_27_267" id="FNanchor_27_267"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_267" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> Deprived of his
+commission after the Germantown campaign, Major Crawford returned
+home and was elected county sheriff, an office which he held
+until succeeded by Henry Antes.<a name="FNanchor_28_268" id="FNanchor_28_268"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_268" class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p>
+
+<p>Of the other local leaders, Horn and Reed held only lesser
+township offices, overseer and supervisor, respectively, in addition to
+operating frontier forts.<a name="FNanchor_29_269" id="FNanchor_29_269"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_269" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> Cookson Long, mentioned as a Fair Play
+man in 1775 in Eleanor Coldren's deposition, later commanded Fort
+Reed, for a time, as a captain of Associators.<a name="FNanchor_30_270" id="FNanchor_30_270"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_270" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> The final two local
+leaders, John Walker and Thomas Hughes, both took turns as Fair
+Play men and as members of the local Committee of Safety.<a name="FNanchor_31_271" id="FNanchor_31_271"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_271" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p>
+
+<p>In analyzing the local leadership roles which these various settlers
+filled, additional and pertinent conclusions become apparent. In the
+first place, the Fair Play men were obviously not the top leaders of
+the community. Henry Antes may have served as their spokesman
+in 1775, and it is quite possible that Robert Fleming was a member
+of the tribunal, but both were more important as county leaders.
+Secondly, Fair Play men were members of the Committee of Safety,
+a fact which suggests that their efforts may have been coordinated.
+Finally, returning to the question of national origin, six of these
+eight local leaders were either Scots, Scotch-Irish, or Irish. The
+other two were Germans. No Englishman was a leader, either regional
+or local, in the Fair Play territory between 1769 and 1784.
+Perhaps, as Carl Becker suggests, this was due to the fact that neither<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span>
+the German nor the Scotch-Irish immigrant held in his breast any
+sentiment of loyalty to King George, or much sympathy with the
+traditions or the leaders of English society.<a name="FNanchor_32_272" id="FNanchor_32_272"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_272" class="fnanchor">[32]</a></p>
+
+<p>What were the particular problems of this frontier and how effective
+were these leaders in meeting them? The question of defense,
+including the daily task of survival in the wilderness, the right of pre-emption,
+and the efforts to obtain frontier representation in the
+assembly: these were the main problems in this pioneer land along
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna. All were not solved during the
+period under analysis, but the attempts to solve these and other problems
+afford us the opportunity to evaluate the leadership in the Fair
+Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>Doubtless, the most pressing public need on this frontier was
+protection from the marauding Indians who plagued these pioneers
+throughout the fifteen years encompassed by this study. Aroused by
+the British during the Revolution, the Indians of the Six Nations
+descended from New York into the West Branch Valley to harass
+and, finally, to drive the Fair Play settlers from their homes. Driven
+from their homes, the frontiersmen of the West Branch first gathered
+in the hastily-constructed and poorly-manned forts conveniently scattered
+along the Susquehanna from Jersey Shore to Lock Haven, but,
+ultimately, these too had to be evacuated in the Great Runaway in
+1778.</p>
+
+<p>The severity of these attacks is evident from this petition from the
+settlers gathered at Fort Horn, above present McElhattan, pleading for
+military support in their perilous position:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>To the Honourable the Supreame Executive Councill of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsyllvania, in Lancaster;</i></p>
+
+<p>Wee, your humble petitioners, the Inhabitance of Bald
+Eagle Township, on the West Branch of Susquehannah,
+Northumberland County, &amp;c., &amp;c., humbly Sheweth: that,
+Wherease, wee are Driven By the Indians from our habitations
+and obblidged to assemble ourselves together for our
+Common Defence, have thought mete to acquaint you with
+our Deplorable situation. Wee have for a month by past, endeavoured
+to maintain our ground, with the loss of nearly
+fifty murdered and made Captives, still Expecting relief
+from Coll. Hunter; but wee are pursuaded that the Gentleman
+has done for us as mutch as has layd in his power; we<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span>
+are at len[g]th surrounded with great numbers on every side,
+and unless Our Honourable Councill Does grant us some
+Assistance wee will Be obblidged to evaquete [<i>sic</i>] this
+frontier; which will be great encouragement to the enemy,
+and Bee very injurious to our Common Cause. We, therefore,
+humbly request that you would grant us as many men
+as you may Judge suficient to Defend four small Garrisons,
+and some amunition, and as we are wery ill prowided with
+arms, we Beg that you would afford us some of them; for
+particulars we refer to the Bearer, Robert Fleming, Esq'r,
+and Begs leave to Conclude. Your humble petitioners, as in
+Duty Bound, shall ever pray.</p>
+
+<p class="signing">Sined by us:<a name="FNanchor_33_273" id="FNanchor_33_273"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_273" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
+</div>
+
+<p>This petition was signed by some forty-seven settlers, including
+John and Robert Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and Samuel Horn.
+Unfortunately, the much-needed assistance was not forthcoming, and
+Colonel Hunter soon sent instructions from Fort Augusta for the
+evacuation of the valley. This evacuation is, of course, the Great Runaway.<a name="FNanchor_34_274" id="FNanchor_34_274"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_274" class="fnanchor">[34]</a>
+It is interesting to note, however, that the bearer of this petition
+was Robert Fleming, one of the regional leaders of the territory.</p>
+
+<p>Although forced to leave the West Branch Valley, the Fair Play
+settlers responded to Colonel Hunter's fervent plea to stay at Fort
+Augusta to help in the defense of this last frontier. Their gallant
+stand on the West Branch and their earnestly successful support of
+Fort Augusta, the last frontier outpost in central Pennsylvania, protected
+the interior, enabled the Continental Congress "to function
+in safety at a period when its collapse would have meant total disaster
+to the American cause," and provided a vivid demonstration of what
+a later president of the United States would call "that last full
+measure of devotion."<a name="FNanchor_35_275" id="FNanchor_35_275"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_275" class="fnanchor">[35]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span></p>
+<p>In the fall of 1778, following the earlier alliance with France, the
+tide of the Revolution began to flow in favor of independence, notwithstanding
+the fact that the Fair Play territory was now deserted.
+But for two years previous, when the issue of independence had been
+in grave doubt, the courageous pioneers of the West Branch stood
+their ground in tiny garrisons at Fort Antes, Fort Horn, and Fort
+Reed, resisting the attacking Indians at the insistence of their leaders,
+that freedom might be preserved. Perhaps it is a little-known story,
+but the fate of independence was in good hands with the Fair Play
+settlers of the West Branch Valley, who fought to preserve it.</p>
+
+<p>Towards the end of the Revolution the Fair Play settlers returned
+to the territory, and a new problem arose, that of title claims or,
+more particularly, the right of pre-emption. Still outside the bounds
+of the Commonwealth and organized government, these frontier squatters
+petitioned the Supreme Council for validation of their land
+claims.<a name="FNanchor_36_276" id="FNanchor_36_276"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_276" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> Two petitions, one in August, 1781, and the other in
+March, 1784, were sent. Their claims were recognized by an act of
+the General Assembly passed in May, 1785.<a name="FNanchor_37_277" id="FNanchor_37_277"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_277" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> By this time, the land
+in question had been opened for settlement by virtue of the
+Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784. Needless to say, their petitions had
+been prompted in part by fear of land speculators who were attempting
+to buy up their lands through the Land Office in Philadelphia.
+The prominence of local leaders, such as Alexander Hamilton and
+John Walker, is once again noted in these petitions. These petitions
+achieved notable results in that the right of pre-emption for the West
+Branch squatters was recognized by the Commonwealth long before
+the national government endorsed the principle. Furthermore, the
+validation of these claims beyond the purchase line of the Stanwix
+Treaty of 1768 provided the first legal recognition of pre-emption in
+the State of Pennsylvania.</p>
+
+<p>Unsuccessful in maintaining their homes against the incursive
+Indians, but successful in regaining them by right of pre-emption,
+the Fair Play settlers were also vitally concerned with representative
+democracy. Locally, on the county level, and in the Province and
+State, these frontiersmen sought to make their wishes known, both to
+and through their political leaders. How well they achieved these<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span>
+goals was influenced by the number of persons whom they elected
+to both legal and extra-legal offices at the various political levels.</p>
+
+<p>The Fair Play settlers managed to send two of their associates to
+the General Assembly in the decade after Lexington and Concord.<a name="FNanchor_38_278" id="FNanchor_38_278"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_278" class="fnanchor">[38]</a>
+These two, Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, constituted a disproportionate
+representation, when one considers the limited population
+of the Fair Play community and the general under-representation
+of the frontier counties at this period. In fact, a few hundred
+families in and around the West Branch were surprisingly fortunate
+to have one of their number, Robert Fleming, in the General Assembly
+when, following a petition from the frontier counties in 1776, a
+new apportionment created an assembly in which fifty-eight legislators
+represented Pennsylvania's 300,000 people.<a name="FNanchor_39_279" id="FNanchor_39_279"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_279" class="fnanchor">[39]</a> However, the elections
+of both Fleming and Antes came after the new constitution of 1776,
+in which each county was given six representatives.<a name="FNanchor_40_280" id="FNanchor_40_280"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_280" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> It can hardly
+be said that the West Branch Valley lacked adequate representation
+in the councils of the State.</p>
+
+<p>Furthermore, Frederick Antes was a delegate to that State Constitutional
+Convention. This not only emphasizes the leadership role
+of Antes, but also points up the good fortune of the Fair Play settlers
+in having one of their community participate in the framing of the
+new State government. Although the Fair Play settlers lived beyond
+the legal limits of settlement, they were very much involved in its
+political affairs.</p>
+
+<p>Aside from the General Assembly and the Constitutional Convention,
+these pioneers of the Northumberland County frontier placed
+three men on the county bench, one of whom was presiding judge.<a name="FNanchor_41_281" id="FNanchor_41_281"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_281" class="fnanchor">[41]</a>
+Fair Play men became justices of fair play in the county courts.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span></p>
+<p>Concerning other county offices, the key position of sheriff was held
+continuously from 1779 to 1785 by members of the Fair Play community.<a name="FNanchor_42_282" id="FNanchor_42_282"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_282" class="fnanchor">[42]</a>
+Here again, it appears that the proper administration of
+justice could be expected from Fair Play men.</p>
+
+<p>Locally, the rotational system of the Fair Play tribunal and the
+frequent changes in the composition of the Committee of Safety give
+rise to the conclusion that political democracy, in the sense of active
+participation in public office, was truly a characteristic of the Fair
+Play territory. Nine different men served on the three-man Committee
+of Safety from February of 1776 to February of 1777, three new
+members being elected semi-annually. Except for the two or three
+years following the Great Runaway, the three members of the Fair
+Play tribunal were elected annually.</p>
+
+<p>In conclusion, then, what can be said regarding the leadership of
+the Fair Play settlers? Except for the dangers from Indian hostility,
+which were compounded by the settlers' limited manpower, the leadership
+was more than adequate, one might say eminently successful, in
+meeting the needs of the frontier. It enacted law, interpreted it, and
+saw to it that the law was carried out on every political level with
+which the West Branch pioneers had contact. In short, it gave them
+a government of, by, and for themselves. This was <i>real</i> representation
+by spokesmen of a small community, very different from <i>virtual</i> representation
+in a distant Parliament, from which their independence
+had now been declared.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_241" id="Footnote_1_241"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_241"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Edwin MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i> (Camden, N. J., 1900).
+This book is a mosaic of primary and secondary sources dealing with the entire
+area, rather than a standard biographical treatment of its particular subject.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_242" id="Footnote_2_242"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_242"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Merle Curti, <i>The Making of an American Community: A Case Study of Democracy
+in a Frontier County</i> (Stanford, 1959), pp. 417-441. This entire fifteenth chapter
+is devoted to both a quantitative and qualitative analysis of "leadership."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_243" id="Footnote_3_243"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_243"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Wealth, i.e., liquid assets, was not necessarily a criterion on this agrarian frontier,
+where a man's assets were not easily convertible into cash. Hence, property
+was the main economic source of value.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_244" id="Footnote_4_244"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_244"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> The records of the first State and county officers are found in the <i>Pennsylvania
+Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 768-772, and John Blair Linn, <i>Annals of Buffalo Valley</i>
+(Harrisburg, 1877), pp. 558-563. Some data are also available in Linn, <i>History
+of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>.
+</p><p>
+The tax listings were located in the <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX,
+437, 468, 557, and 618-622. Mrs. Russell also collected a listing for the years 1774
+to 1800 for Northumberland County. Court records, pension claims, Meginness'
+<i>Otzinachson</i> (1889) and <i>Frontier Forts of Pennsylvania</i> provided the remaining
+data.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_245" id="Footnote_5_245"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_245"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, p. 19.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_246" id="Footnote_6_246"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_246"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, pp. 20-21. MacMinn also calls the senior Antes the father of the Unity
+Conferences of Christian Endeavor and presents a copy of a letter written on Dec.
+17, 1741, calling for a New Year's Day meeting of Christians in Germantown in
+1742 in support of this statement. Of his minor judicial role, MacMinn offers this
+account published in Christopher Saur's <i>Pensylvanische Berichte</i> for May 16,
+1756: "Were such magistrates more numerous, the poor would not have cause to
+complain and to weep over gross injustices which they have to suffer because persons
+are respected."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_247" id="Footnote_7_247"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_247"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 248.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_248" id="Footnote_8_248"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_248"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 484. <i>See also</i>, MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with
+Colonel Antes</i>, p. 324.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_249" id="Footnote_9_249"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_249"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, pp. 316, 413; and <i>Pennsylvania
+Archives</i>, Second Series, III, p. 769.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_250" id="Footnote_10_250"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_250"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 472.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_251" id="Footnote_11_251"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_251"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_252" id="Footnote_12_252"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_252"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Linn, <i>Annals of the Buffalo Valley</i>, p. 95; and Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889),
+p. 473.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_253" id="Footnote_13_253"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_253"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, p. 316.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_254" id="Footnote_14_254"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_254"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 473.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_255" id="Footnote_15_255"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_255"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 770.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_256" id="Footnote_16_256"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_256"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, pp. 416-420. See also Alex. Patterson
+to John Dickinson (October 28, 1783) in the Zebulon Butler Papers, Wyoming
+Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. Patterson, speaking of
+Antes' failure to arrest Zebulon Butler, said of Antes: "The Sheriff has not done
+his duty nor do I believe he intends it being. A party man among which I am
+sorry to see so little principels of humanity or honnor, Men who wish for popularity
+at the Expense of the Propperty and perhaps blood of their fellow Citizens...."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_257" id="Footnote_17_257"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_257"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 768-772, and MacMinn, <i>On the
+Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, pp. 330, 395, and 413.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_258" id="Footnote_18_258"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_258"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 769.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_259" id="Footnote_19_259"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_259"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 771.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_260" id="Footnote_20_260"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_260"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, pp. 769, 771; Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, pp. 473-474;
+and <i>Colonial Records</i>, XI, 367.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_261" id="Footnote_21_261"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_261"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 618.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_262" id="Footnote_22_262"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_262"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> MacMinn, <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes</i>, pp. 12 and 420.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_263" id="Footnote_23_263"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_263"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Third Series, XIX, 437.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_264" id="Footnote_24_264"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_264"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> <i>Colonial Records</i>, XII. 137.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_265" id="Footnote_25_265"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_265"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> <i>Fithian: Journal</i>, p. 81.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_266" id="Footnote_26_266"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_266"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 473. The full account of
+Hamilton's military service is given in the Hamilton Pension Papers in the Wagner
+Collection, Muncy Historical Society. Hamilton had also been a member of the
+group commissioned to lay out a road from Bald Eagle Creek to Fort Augusta.
+Linn, <i>History</i>, p. 472.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_267" id="Footnote_27_267"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_267"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 474, and Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1889), p. 474.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_268" id="Footnote_28_268"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_268"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 770.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_269" id="Footnote_29_269"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_269"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Linn, <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties</i>, p. 472.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_270" id="Footnote_30_270"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_270"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 473.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_271" id="Footnote_31_271"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_271"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>; Yeates, <i>Pennsylvania Reports</i>, I, 498; and Russell, "Signers of the Pine
+Creek Declaration of Independence," p. 4.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_272" id="Footnote_32_272"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_272"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> Becker, <i>Beginnings of the American People</i>, p. 180.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_273" id="Footnote_33_273"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_273"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, pp. 217-218. The petition was dated
+June 21, 1778. The situation had been further complicated by the enlistment the
+previous summer of many of the able-bodied men to aid Washington in Cambridge,
+Massachusetts. These men, "early in the service of their Country from the
+unpurchased land on the West Branch of the River Susquehanna," deprived the
+valley of its available manpower.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_274" id="Footnote_34_274"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_274"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#CHAPTER_TWO">Chapter Two</a> for a fuller description of the Great Runaway.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_275" id="Footnote_35_275"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_275"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Helen Herritt Russell, "The Great Runaway of 1778," <i>The Journal of the
+Lycoming Historical Society</i>, II, No. 4 (1961), 3-10. This article contains a few
+additions to an article by the same name by Mrs. Russell published in <i>The Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XXIII (1960),
+1-16.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_276" id="Footnote_36_276"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_276"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 518-522.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_277" id="Footnote_37_277"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_277"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_278" id="Footnote_38_278"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_278"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, as previously noted, had been elected in
+1777 and 1784, respectively.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_279" id="Footnote_39_279"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_279"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Dunaway, <i>History of Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 176, 196. Of these fifty-eight, twenty-eight
+came from the frontier counties of York, Berks, Bedford, Cumberland, and
+Northumberland.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_280" id="Footnote_40_280"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_280"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Wallace, <i>Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation</i>, pp. 105-106.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_281" id="Footnote_41_281"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_281"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> As previously noted, Henry Antes had been appointed judge of the Court of
+Quarter Sessions in 1775, and Frederick Antes and Fleming had been elected in
+1780 and 1785, respectively. Frederick Antes was president judge.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_282" id="Footnote_42_282"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_282"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 770.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_SEVEN" id="CHAPTER_SEVEN"></a><small>CHAPTER SEVEN</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>Democracy on the Pennsylvania Frontier</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>One of the most often used and least understood words in
+the American lexicon is the term "democracy." In the colonial
+period, it was seldom used, except in denunciation. However,
+properly defined, it can help us to evaluate the Fair Play settlers in
+some understandable context. Etymologically stemming from two
+Greek words, <i>demos</i>, meaning "the people," and <i>kratos</i>, meaning
+"authority," democracy means "authority in the people" or, we can
+say, "self-determination." By self-determination is meant the right
+of the people to decide their own political, economic, and social
+institutions.</p>
+
+<p>Self-determination in its basic, or political, context can best be
+explained through James Bryce's definition of a democracy. Lord
+Bryce said:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>The word Democracy has been used ever since the time
+of Herodotus to denote that form of government in which
+the ruling power of a State is legally vested, not in any particular
+class or classes, but in the members of the community
+as a whole.<a name="FNanchor_1_283" id="FNanchor_1_283"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_283" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Analyzing the key phrases in Bryce's statement, we can best clarify
+the meaning of political self-determination.</p>
+
+<p>(1) "The ruling power of a State." Self-determination, as it is
+employed here, concerns the right of the people of Fair Play society
+to determine their own political institutions. Fair Play society did
+not constitute a state, but it was a political community, and in that
+sense Bryce's definition applies. Living outside the legal limit of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span>
+settlement of Province and Commonwealth, these people could not
+obtain legal authority for their own rule, so, following the prevalent
+theory of the social compact, they formed their own government.
+The result was the annual election, by the people, of the Fair Play
+tribunal, the source of final authority in the Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>(2) "Is legally vested." Fair Play society was actually illegal; that
+is to say, the settlements were made in violation of the laws of the
+Province. However, the extra-legal government which was formed
+was created by, and responsive to, the popular will. Since the actual
+authority for rule was vested in the people, it can be considered as
+legal for the Fair Play community.</p>
+
+<p>(3) "In the members of the community." The members of the
+Fair Play community, as previously noted, were not strictly resident
+within the geographic confines of the Fair Play territory. Communities,
+it has been said, are total ways of life, complexes Of behavior composed
+of all the institutions necessary to carry on a complete life,
+formed into a working whole.<a name="FNanchor_2_284" id="FNanchor_2_284"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_284" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> Self-determination, as it is used here,
+suggests that the community as a whole participates in the decision-making
+process.</p>
+
+<p>(4) "Not in any particular class or classes, but in the members of
+the community as a whole." Bryce's definition here extends the interpretation
+of "the members of the community." Obviously, if any
+particular class or classes were vested with the final political authority,
+then the people as a whole, that is, the Fair Play community, would
+not exercise self-determination.</p>
+
+<p>The concept of self-determination, carried to an economic context,
+suggests that the people of the Fair Play community had the right
+to determine their own economic institutions. This means that they
+had the right to choose their own portion of land, subject, of course,
+to the will of the existing community, and to utilize it according to
+their own needs and interests. This meant that no undemocratic and
+feudalistic practices, such as primogeniture and entail, could exist.
+Granted that this is self-determination rather broadly interpreted in
+an economic context, the question is whether or not these people had
+the right to choose their own plot of ground and work it as they saw
+fit, unhampered by any preordained system of discrimination or
+restriction.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Socially, the idea of self-determination is applied to evaluate the religious
+institutions, the class structure, and the value system. The
+application concerns, once again, the authority of the people to determine
+their own social patterns. It questions whether or not any
+Fair Play settler could worship according to the dictates of his own
+conscience. It evaluates the class structure to ascertain whether or not
+a superimposed caste system ordered the class structure of Fair Play
+society, rather than a community-determined system in which choice
+and opportunity provided flexibility and mobility. And finally, it
+considers whether or not the values of the Fair Play settlers were inculcated
+by some internal clique or external force, rather than being
+developed by the members of the community themselves.</p>
+
+<p>Did democracy exist on this Pennsylvania frontier? Was the Fair
+Play system marked by real representation and popular control? These
+questions must be answered before any judgment can be made concerning
+political democracy in the West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>Was there equality of economic opportunity on this farmers' frontier?
+Was land available to all who sought it, and on equal terms?
+These problems need to be considered before we can attach the label
+"democratic" on the economic life of the Fair Play settlers.</p>
+
+<p>If democracy prizes diversity, as some claim, were the diverse elements
+of Fair Play society equally recognized?<a name="FNanchor_3_285" id="FNanchor_3_285"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_285" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Was the class structure
+open or closed, mobile or fixed? Did the mixed national stocks
+enjoy religious freedom? One needs to inquire into each of these
+areas prior to a final evaluation of Fair Play society.</p>
+
+<p>A useful tool for evaluating political democracy can be found in
+Ranney and Kendall's <i>Democracy and the American Party System</i>.<a name="FNanchor_4_286" id="FNanchor_4_286"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_286" class="fnanchor">[4]</a>
+It suggests the use of popular sovereignty, political equality, popular
+consultation, and majority rule as criteria for democracy. Accepting
+these criteria as basic principles of democracy, we can begin to
+analyze the democratic character of the Fair Play system.</p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span></p>
+<p>A political system based upon popular sovereignty is one in which
+the final authority to rule is vested in the people. The question of
+who the people are is still before us today. In the fullest sense, popular
+sovereignty means rule by all the people, but in colonial America
+the "people" was a much more qualified term. It generally signified
+white, Protestant, adult males who were property owners. In the Fair
+Play territory, the ruling "people" were "the whole body" of adult
+male settlers who annually elected their governing tribunal and participated
+in the decisions of its "court."<a name="FNanchor_5_287" id="FNanchor_5_287"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_287" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> Lacking an established
+church, or any church for that matter, and possessing property lying
+beyond legal limits of settlement, the Fair Play settlers could not
+have enforced religious or property qualifications for voting, even if
+they had so desired, and there is no evidence to indicate that they
+did. Furthermore, the frequency of elections, which were held annually,
+and the principle of rotating the offices among the settlers
+tended to emphasize the sovereignty of the people in this part of the
+West Branch Valley. The right of suffrage, it is true, had not been
+extended to women, but this was the rule throughout colonial America.
+Popular sovereignty, in its qualified eighteenth-century sense, was
+a basic characteristic of the political democracy which existed on this
+frontier.</p>
+
+<p>Political equality, that is "one man, one vote," was practiced by
+the pioneers of the West Branch. There was no additional vote given
+to the large property owners; in fact, as the tax lists indicate, there
+were no large property owners within the geographic limits of the
+Fair Play territory. Thus, each man, rather than a small ruling
+oligarchy, had the opportunity to participate in the decision-making
+process of the Fair Play community.</p>
+
+<p>In a democratic society, the people must be consulted by the policy
+makers prior to their exercise of the power of decision. Among the
+Fair Play settlers this basically democratic principle was vividly demonstrated
+in the case of disputed land titles, the primary concern of
+the Fair Play men. In both Eleanor Coldren's deposition in behalf
+of her deceased husband and in the Huff-Latcha case, it was established
+that the unanimous consent of the prospective neighbors had
+to be obtained before a favorable decision was rendered in behalf<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span>
+of the land claimants.<a name="FNanchor_6_288" id="FNanchor_6_288"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_288" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> The frequency of elections, combined
+with the ease and regularity of assembly, provided the settlers with
+the opportunity to become acquainted with the circumstances of
+their problems. Here again, the paucity of specific data prompts us
+to some speculation regarding the nature and location of these meetings.
+However, it must be added, the Hamilton pension papers and
+the petitions to the Supreme Council in Philadelphia refer specifically
+to meetings at Fort Horn and Fort Antes.<a name="FNanchor_7_289" id="FNanchor_7_289"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_289" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> Direct representation
+based upon popular consultation was a distinct trait of the political
+democracy in the Fair Play territory.</p>
+
+<p>The fourth principle of political democracy, majority rule, is probably
+the most controversial and confusing element of the combination.
+Absolute majority rule, its critics tell us, means majority "tyranny"
+and minority acquiescence, despite the fact that this fear is not empirically
+demonstrable.<a name="FNanchor_8_290" id="FNanchor_8_290"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_290" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> The majority ruled absolutely in the Fair
+Play territory just as it did in the New England town meeting, and
+with similar results. However, it never restricted suffrage or public
+office to particular religious or nationality groups. Scotch-Irish,
+English, and German settlers participated equally in the political
+process. However, as we pointed out in the last chapter, the English
+did not enjoy leadership roles in the community.<a name="FNanchor_9_291" id="FNanchor_9_291"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_291" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> Whether this was
+by accident or by design is difficult to ascertain. Perhaps it was just
+a further demonstration of the absolute rule of the majority with the
+Scotch-Irish and the Germans combining to form that majority.</p>
+
+<p>The nature of community implies shared interests and the prevailing
+interest in this frontier community was survival. Necessity undoubtedly
+caused the English minority to accept the Scotch-Irish and
+German leadership, because forbearance meant survival. Conversely,
+the Scotch-Irish and Germans could, and did, support the English in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span>
+positions of responsibility on the basis of their mutual needs and
+their desire to maintain the community.<a name="FNanchor_10_292" id="FNanchor_10_292"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_292" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> Not only physical survival
+but also economic survival were mutually desirable to Fair Play
+community members, and the decisions of the court were rendered on
+the basis of equal justice.<a name="FNanchor_11_293" id="FNanchor_11_293"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_293" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+<p>As long as minority feelings are given free expression in an atmosphere
+of mutual concern, there is little danger of misinterpretation
+by the majority. Such a climate prevailed in the meetings of the
+Fair Play settlers and the sessions of the Fair Play men; at least, there
+is no available evidence to the contrary.</p>
+
+<p>The nature and role of consensus in the Fair Play territory hinged
+upon what was best for the community. Fundamental agreement was
+reached, based upon mutual need apparent from open discussion.
+In the event of conflict, forbearance, which was in the best interest
+of the community, could be expected.<a name="FNanchor_12_294" id="FNanchor_12_294"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_294" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> An examination of the appearance
+dockets of the county courts for Northumberland and Lycoming
+counties suggests, however, that this consensus did not extend
+to questions of land titles. Nevertheless, the all-inclusiveness of signatures
+on petitions to the Supreme Executive Council for protection
+from the Indians and for the recognition of the right of pre-emption,
+and the general response of the Fair Play settlers to calls for troops
+for the Continental Army indicate to some degree the nature and extent
+of that consensus.<a name="FNanchor_13_295" id="FNanchor_13_295"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_295" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p>
+
+<p>Democracy, that is self-determination, did exist among the Fair
+Play settlers of this Pennsylvania frontier. There was no outside authority<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span>
+which legislated the affairs of the pioneers of the West Branch.
+They selected their own representatives, the Fair Play men, and
+maintained their control over them, a control which was assured both
+by annual elections and the full participation of the settlers in the
+decision-making process. The will of the majority prevailed, and that
+will was expressed through a community consensus reached by the full
+participation of political equals. It was neither radical nor revolutionary,
+but it was typical of the American colonial experience. The
+Fair Play settlers had not "jumped the gun" on independence, although
+they participated in the movement. They did not rebel
+against a ruling aristocracy. They simply governed themselves.</p>
+
+<p>Self-determination, as we have already stated, includes the right of
+the people to decide upon their own economic institutions. This right
+was asserted on the farmers' frontier of the West Branch. With free
+land available to those who worked it, provided the neighbors and
+the Fair Play men approved, economic opportunity was shared by the
+Scotch-Irish, English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and French settlers.<a name="FNanchor_14_296" id="FNanchor_14_296"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_296" class="fnanchor">[14]</a>
+This sharing, in itself, was a demonstration of economic democracy.</p>
+
+<p>The labor system, too, was an affirmation of the democratic ideal.
+Because free land was available in the Fair Play territory, neither
+slavery nor involuntary servitude existed in this region, although it
+was found in immediately adjacent areas.<a name="FNanchor_15_297" id="FNanchor_15_297"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_297" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> Free labor, family labor
+to be more exact, was the system employed in this portion of the
+West Branch Valley. Noticeable, too, was the spirit of cooperation
+in such enterprises as cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, harvesting, cornhuskings
+and the like. This mutual helpfulness was characteristic of
+the frontier and obviated the necessity of any enforced labor system.</p>
+
+<p>Tenancy was occasionally practiced in the Fair Play territory, although
+it appears that the tenant farmer suffered no feelings of inferiority,
+if the following case is any example:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>... Peter Dewitt ... leased the land in question to William
+McIlhatton as a Cropper, who took possession of it after
+Huggins left it: That the Terms of the Lease were that McIlhatton
+should possess the Land about two or three Years,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span>
+rendering hold of the Crops to be raised unto Peter Dewitt,
+who was to find him a Team and farming Utensils: That
+the Lease was in Writing and Lodged with a certain Daniel
+Cruger who lived in the Neighborhood at that Time.<a name="FNanchor_16_298" id="FNanchor_16_298"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_298" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Sometime later, McElhattan obtained the lease from Cruger and
+sold "his right" to William Dunn, claiming that Dewitt had failed
+to fill his end of the bargain, despite the fact that Eleanor Coldren
+gave evidence to the contrary. When challenged for selling Dewitt's
+land, McElhattan responded in a fashion which demonstrates the independent
+spirit of this lessee. He said "that he only sold his Right
+to Dunn and if Dunn would be such a fool as to give him forty or
+fifty pounds for Nothing He McIlhatton would be a greater fool for
+not taking it&mdash;for that Dunn knew what Right he (McIlhatton)
+had."<a name="FNanchor_17_299" id="FNanchor_17_299"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_299" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> Obviously, if this case is indicative, and there were others,
+share-cropping did not induce attitudes of subservience.</p>
+
+<p>Religious freedom, in which Pennsylvania ranked second only to
+Rhode Island in colonial America, was enjoyed by the frontiersmen
+of the West Branch. It might, however, be better described as a
+freedom from religion rather than a freedom of religion. With no
+system of local taxation and no regular church, there was no establishment
+of religion. Nevertheless, this is not to suggest that religious
+qualifications were not applied to prospective landowners, potential
+voters, or members of the Fair Play community. Religious liberty had
+been guaranteed to Pennsylvanians in the Charter of Privileges of
+1701, and no religious test was required for suffrage in the new State
+constitution in 1776. Belief in one God and in the inspiration of the
+Scriptures was required for members of the assembly, but bona fide
+Fair Play settlers were disqualified on geographic grounds anyhow.<a name="FNanchor_18_300" id="FNanchor_18_300"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_300" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p>
+
+<p>There is no record of religious discrimination among the Fair Play
+settlers. In addition to the absence of a regular church, this was
+probably due, in part, to the religious composition of the population.
+The pioneers of the West Branch were Protestant Christians,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span>
+and if denominational in their approach, either Presbyterian or Methodist.
+The friction between Methodists and Presbyterians appears to
+have been doctrinal rather than political or social.<a name="FNanchor_19_301" id="FNanchor_19_301"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_301" class="fnanchor">[19]</a></p>
+
+<p>The comparative economic equality in an area of free land had
+a democratizing influence on the social class structure. This three-class
+stratification, composed of property owners distinguished by their
+morality, other property owners, and tenants, was an open-class system
+marked by a noticeable degree of mobility. Fair Play settlers who
+began as tenants could, and did, become property owners.</p>
+
+<p>Since no one in the Fair Play territory could claim more than 300
+acres under the Pre-Emption Act of 1785, there was little chance for
+the development of an aristocratic class.<a name="FNanchor_20_302" id="FNanchor_20_302"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_302" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> It was a society of achievement
+in which the race was open to anyone who could acquire land,
+with the approval of his neighbors and the Fair Play men, and "improve"
+it. There is no evidence to indicate that the availability of
+land was restricted because of national origin, religious affiliation, or
+a previous condition of servitude. This is not to say that the judgments
+of neighbors may not have been based upon these criteria, but,
+at least, there is no record of such discrimination. The Fair Play settlers
+were eighteenth-century souls and romantic egalitarianism was
+not a characteristic of such persons. The frontier, however, broke
+"the cake of custom" and the necessities of that experience contributed
+to the development of democracy as we have defined it.</p>
+
+<p>A recent writer, analyzing the "democracy" of the Scotch-Irish, made
+his evaluation on the basis of the contemporary French definition of
+liberty, equality, and fraternity.<a name="FNanchor_21_303" id="FNanchor_21_303"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_303" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> On this basis, the Scotch-Irish fail;
+but if we equate democracy with self-determination, the Scotch-Irish
+and the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley can be seen as
+thoroughgoing democrats.</p>
+
+<p>The value system of the pioneers on the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+reflected, at least in part, the democracy of the frontier. The
+spirit of cooperation and mutual helpfulness was a prime characteristic
+of this frontier, as it was of others. Cabin-raisings, barn-raisings,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span>
+and the cooperative enterprises at harvesttime enhanced the spirit of
+community and brought the settlers together in common efforts, which
+demonstrated their equality. Individualism could be harnessed for
+the common good, and such was the case among the Fair Play settlers
+in the struggle for economic survival.</p>
+
+<p>Faith, patriotism, and temperance were not necessarily democratic,
+but they also were part of the value system of the Fair Play settlers.
+In matters of faith, there was a certain "live and let live" philosophy,
+which had democratic implications. Despite the conflict between Methodists
+and Presbyterians, the members of the Presbyterian majority
+made their homes available to Methodist preachers.<a name="FNanchor_22_304" id="FNanchor_22_304"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_304" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> This demonstrated
+a willingness at least to hear "the other side." Such an atmosphere
+is conducive to democracy, if not to conversion. There is
+little doubt, however, that this receptivity was due in part to the absence
+of any "regular" church or preacher. Here again, the necessities
+of the frontier made "democrats" of its occupants.</p>
+
+<p>The most intense patriots are often ethnocentric and chauvinistic.
+The Fair Play settlers were such patriots, according to one journalist.<a name="FNanchor_23_305" id="FNanchor_23_305"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_305" class="fnanchor">[23]</a>
+However, the patriotism of the eighteenth century had not reached
+the level of concern for all mankind which finds expression today.
+The pioneers of the West Branch were democrats in an age not yet
+conditioned to democracy.</p>
+
+<p>Temperance, particularly with regard to the use of spirited beverages,
+usually implies abstinence, which is certainly not democratic
+if it is applied in a formally imposed prohibition without any local
+option. Abstinence by choice, however, is purely a matter of self-determination.
+But in an area where drinking was a commonly accepted
+practice, such as the frontier, the term signifies moderation.
+In the Fair Play territory drinking, but not drunkenness, was condoned.
+The spirit of the frontier, or the use of it, was not incompatible with
+democracy.</p>
+
+<p>Frontier values, for the most part then, were democratic in tendency.
+Noteworthy for their attitude of community cooperation and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span>
+mutual helpfulness, supported by a faith which could not afford to be
+exclusive, temperate in their personal habits, particularly in the use
+of alcohol, the patriots of the Fair Play territory looked to a future
+filled with promise and opportunity for all the diverse elements of their
+society. This is the democracy which the frontier nurtured. It flourished
+in the West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>In summary then, was self-determination the central theme in the
+Fair Play territory? Did the Fair Play settlers truly determine their
+own political, economic, and social institutions? The available data
+suggest that they did.</p>
+
+<p>The democracy of the Fair Play settlers encompassed popular
+sovereignty, political equality, popular consultation, majority rule,
+religious freedom, an open class structure, free land, free labor,
+and a value system whose dominating feature was mutual helpfulness.
+The democracy of Fair Play was basically the fair play of
+democracy.</p>
+
+<p>Observable in this atmosphere were the traits of a developing
+American character, traits which the frontier historian, Frederick
+Jackson Turner, defined as democratic.<a name="FNanchor_24_306" id="FNanchor_24_306"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_306" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> These included the composite
+nationality of a population of mixed national origins; the
+self-reliance which the new experience of the frontier developed; the
+independence, both of action and in spirit, which the relative isolation
+of the environment promoted; a rationalistic, or pragmatic, approach
+to problems necessitated by circumstances lacking in precedents for
+solution; and perhaps a growing nationalism, marked by an identification
+with something larger than the mere Provincial assembly,
+something existing, but not yet realized, the American nation.</p>
+
+<p>These traits, in conjunction with Turner's thesis, are a major concern
+of the final chapter. That chapter will provide an evaluation of
+frontier ethnography as a technique for testing the validity of this
+interpretation of Turner's thesis on the Fair Play frontier of the
+West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_283" id="Footnote_1_283"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_283"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Quoted in Austin Ranney and Willmoore Kendall, <i>Democracy and the American
+Party System</i> (New York, 1956), pp. 23-24.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_284" id="Footnote_2_284"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_284"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Don Martindale, <i>American Society</i> (New York, 1960), p. 105.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_285" id="Footnote_3_285"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_285"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> National Education Association, Educational Policies Commission, <i>The Education
+of Free Men in American Democracy</i> (Washington, 1941), pp. 25-26.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_286" id="Footnote_4_286"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_286"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Pp. 18-39.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_287" id="Footnote_5_287"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_287"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_288" id="Footnote_6_288"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_288"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222; Lycoming County Docket No. 2,
+Commencing 1797, No. 32; <i>see also</i>, Chapter Two, <i>passim</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_289" id="Footnote_7_289"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_289"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 217; and the Muncy Historical Society,
+Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_290" id="Footnote_8_290"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_290"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Ranney and Kendall, <i>Democracy and the American Party System</i>, p. 47. The
+authors argue here that the history of town meetings in America and the Parliamentary
+system in Great Britain shows hundreds of years without majority tyranny
+or civil war.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_291" id="Footnote_9_291"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_291"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Chapter Six, pp. 78, 84.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_292" id="Footnote_10_292"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_292"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 770. For example, John Chatham,
+an English miller, was elected coroner in 1782, a minor role to be sure, but he
+was supported.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_293" id="Footnote_11_293"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_293"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 196-197. In <i>Sweeney</i> vs. <i>Toner</i>, an Englishman, Toner's
+property right was upheld because his absence was for military service, despite
+the fact that Sweeney, a Scotch-Irishman, was a majority representative.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_294" id="Footnote_12_294"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_294"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers," p. 424. The case cited here,
+<i>Huff</i> vs. <i>Satcha</i>, saw the use of militia to drive off a landholder whose title had
+been denied by the Fair Play men.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_295" id="Footnote_13_295"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_295"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 217-218, 417-418, and 518-522. On
+page 417, fifty-three officers and soldiers are described as "early in the service from
+the unpurchased land." Thirty-nine petitioners (p. 520) sought pre-emption, a
+claim repeated over two years later by some fifty-three settlers. The petition to
+the Supreme Council (p. 217) for protection from the Indians in 1778 prior to the
+Great Runaway bore forty-seven names.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_296" id="Footnote_14_296"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_296"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> <i>See</i> Chapter Two for a demographic analysis of the Fair Play settlers.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_297" id="Footnote_15_297"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_297"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 28.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_298" id="Footnote_16_298"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_298"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," p. 222.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_299" id="Footnote_17_299"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_299"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_300" id="Footnote_18_300"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_300"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>See</i> Chapter One for the geographic bounds of the Fair Play territory. The
+Fair Play territory did not come under State jurisdiction until the second Stanwix
+Treaty in 1784. Regardless, it must be remembered that settlers on the south
+bank of the Susquehanna actually participated in the political, economic, and
+social life of the community. The fact that these participants were often community
+leaders was pointed out in Chapter Six.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_301" id="Footnote_19_301"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_301"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> <i>See</i> the footnotes in Chapter Five referring to <i>The Journal of William Colbert</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_302" id="Footnote_20_302"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_302"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Smith, <i>Laws</i>, II, 195.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_303" id="Footnote_21_303"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_303"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, pp. 311-314.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_304" id="Footnote_22_304"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_304"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> <i>The Journal of William Colbert.</i> Colbert had been received at Annanias
+McFaddon's (Aug. 20, 1792, Sept. 4, 1793) and John Hamilton's (July 23, 1792,
+Aug. 20, 1793), where he both preached and lodged. Both were Presbyterians,
+and, as noted earlier, Colbert expressed grave doubts concerning his efforts there.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_305" id="Footnote_23_305"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_305"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 307.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_306" id="Footnote_24_306"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_306"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Turner, <i>Frontier and Section</i>, p. 5.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="CHAPTER_EIGHT" id="CHAPTER_EIGHT"></a><small>CHAPTER EIGHT</small></h2>
+
+<h3 class="ity"><big>Frontier Ethnography and the Turner Thesis</big></h3>
+
+
+<p>In the first chapter of his recent study, <i>The Making of an American
+Community</i>, Merle Curti suggests that "less is to be gained
+by further analysis of Turner's brilliant and far-ranging but often
+ambiguous presentations than by patient and careful study of particular
+frontier areas in the light of the investigator's interpretation
+of Turner's theory."<a name="FNanchor_1_307" id="FNanchor_1_307"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_307" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> This study was undertaken with just such a
+purpose in mind. In addition, it is hoped that this investigation will
+give some insight into the value of ethnography and its usefulness as
+an analytic technique in studying the frontier.</p>
+
+<p>By definition, ethnography is "the scientific description of nations
+or races of men, their customs, habits, and differences."<a name="FNanchor_2_308" id="FNanchor_2_308"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_308" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> Frontier
+ethnography is the scientific description of the full institutional pattern
+of a particular group of people, located specifically on a certain
+frontier, within a certain period of time. That institutional pattern
+is described from the analysis of data concerning the political and
+economic systems, and the social structure, including religion, the
+family, the value system, social classes, art, music, recreation, mythology,
+and folklore. Also, as noted in the first two chapters of this
+study, geographic and demographic data have been analyzed in an
+attempt to picture the area under observation and the people who
+inhabited that region. It is believed that these various data present
+a fuller view of the "way of life" of these people than the earlier
+politico-military accounts of nineteenth-century historians.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, there are certain limitations in this particular analysis.
+This study is not meant to be typical of the frontier experience or
+necessarily representative of frontier communities. However, it would
+have broader implications if a similar study were made for Greene
+County in western Pennsylvania, where a group composed mainly of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span>
+Scotch-Irish Presbyterians also set up a "Fair Play system."<a name="FNanchor_3_309" id="FNanchor_3_309"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_309" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Furthermore,
+it is my interpretation of Turner's thesis which is being tested,
+not the validity of the thesis.</p>
+
+<p>Despite the fact that the Fair Play settlers and their "system" have
+been referred to by both Pennsylvania and frontier historians in the
+twentieth century, neither the settlers nor their system has been
+studied in depth.<a name="FNanchor_4_310" id="FNanchor_4_310"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_310" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> Meginness and Linn, the foremost historians of the
+West Branch, were both nineteenth-century writers, and, unfortunately,
+twentieth-century scholars have not considered the Fair Play
+settlers worthy of their study. Biographical studies are limited to the
+work of Edwin MacMinn on Colonel Antes, completed in 1900. As a
+result, there has been a definite need for an investigation collating the
+researches of these earlier historians and based upon the available
+primary data. This study is an attempt to fill the void.</p>
+
+<p>The seeming paucity of primary source materials is a further complication
+to the student of Fair Play history. However, letters, journals,
+diaries, probate records, tax lists, pension claims, and court records
+offer adequate data to the inquiring historian, although the
+extra-legal character of the settlement seriously reduced the public
+record. Nevertheless, the broad scope of ethnography provides the
+kind of study for which the data supply a rather full picture of life
+on this frontier. Political, economic, and social patterns are discernible,
+although no day-by-day account for any extended period has been
+uncovered.</p>
+
+<p>This ethnographic analysis demonstrates the merits of the "civilization
+approach" to history. Examining every aspect of a society, it
+provides more than a mere "battles and leaders" account. The result
+gives insight into a "style of life" rather than a chronology of highlights.
+This study has investigated the full institutional structure of
+the Fair Play frontier, evaluating that structure in terms of a developing
+democracy, or, at least, of democratic tendencies.</p>
+
+<p>American civilization was a frontier civilization from the outset,
+and that frontier experience was significant in the development of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span>
+American democracy. Frederick Jackson Turner's frontier thesis,
+which has probably inspired more historical scholarship than any other
+American thesis, stated that "the existence of an area of free land, its
+continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward,
+explain American development."<a name="FNanchor_5_311" id="FNanchor_5_311"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_311" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> That development took
+place on successive frontiers stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific
+Coast over a period of almost three centuries. Turner's second frontier,
+the Allegheny Mountains, marked the farmers' frontier of the
+Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley.</p>
+
+<p>It was on the frontier, according to Turner, that the "true" traits
+of American character emerged; its composite nationality, its self-reliant
+spirit, its independence of thought and action, its nationalism, and
+its rationalistic approach to the problems of a pioneer existence.
+The Fair Play settlers, American frontiersmen, suggested some of
+these traits in their character. Recognizing the data limitations of
+this study, the evidence indicates some validation of this test of Turner's
+model. However, it would be presumptuous indeed to conclude
+that this analysis offers a complete demonstration of the impact of
+the frontier in the development of traits of character which Turner
+classified as American.</p>
+
+<p>The composite nationality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly
+evident from the demographic analysis offered at the beginning of
+this study.<a name="FNanchor_6_312" id="FNanchor_6_312"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_312" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> Seven different national stock groups appeared on this
+frontier: Scotch-Irish, English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and
+French. Here, indeed, was "the crucible of the frontier," in which
+settlers were "Americanized, liberated, and fused into a mixed race."<a name="FNanchor_7_313" id="FNanchor_7_313"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_313" class="fnanchor">[7]</a></p>
+
+<p>The legendary self-reliance of the frontiersman is not without some
+basis in fact. The nature of the frontier experience itself was conducive
+to its development. Its appearance among the Fair Play settlers
+is implied in various contexts. Politically, it is suggested in the creation
+of the Fair Play men, the annual governing tribunal, an extra-legal
+political agency in this extra-Provincial territory. Economically,
+it is intimated in the image of the frontier farmer tackling the wilderness
+with rifle and plow and the unbounded determination to make<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span>
+a better life for himself and his family. Socially, the self-reliance of
+these doughty pioneers is indicated in the continuation of their religious
+practices and worship, despite the absence of any organized
+church. Their self reliance is indicated, as well, in the flexibility of a
+social structure whose main criterion was achievement, a society in
+which "what" you were was more important than "who" you were.
+These examples are, of course, only brief glimpses of the elusive trait
+of self-reliance which Turner considered typical of the frontier.</p>
+
+<p>Independence, or the ability to act independently, was a characteristic
+frontier trait, according to Turner. The Fair Play settlers presented
+some contradictions. It is true that they organized their own
+system of government and the code under which it operated. However,
+their key leaders lived on the periphery; and the settlers
+petitioned the Commonwealth government for assistance in the vital
+questions of defense and pre-emption rights.<a name="FNanchor_8_314" id="FNanchor_8_314"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_314" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> The Fair Play settlers
+were generally independent, a condition promoted by the necessities
+of frontier life; but, obviously, they were not isolated.</p>
+
+<p>It is difficult to assess the nationalizing influence of this particular
+frontier. In the first place, aside from the Second Continental Congress,
+there was no national government during most of the Fair
+Play period. The Articles of Confederation were not ratified until
+1781, and Fair Play territory was opened to settlement after the
+Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784. Furthermore, the patriotism of the
+Fair Play settlers seems to reflect an ethnocentric pride in their own
+territory and an exaggerated interpretation of its significance to the
+developing nation.<a name="FNanchor_9_315" id="FNanchor_9_315"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_315" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> Their patriotism was apparently for an ideal, liberty,
+to which they were devoted, having already enjoyed it in a nation
+only recently declared, but yet to be recognized. And, for its support,
+there had been a rush to the colors by these settlers "beyond
+the purchase line."<a name="FNanchor_10_316" id="FNanchor_10_316"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_316" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> The "real American Revolution," as John Adams
+described it, was "in the minds and hearts of the people," and it was
+"effected before the war Commenced."<a name="FNanchor_11_317" id="FNanchor_11_317"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_317" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> That revolution had already<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span>
+occurred in the Fair Play territory prior to the firing of "the shot
+heard round the world" on Lexington green.</p>
+
+<p>The frontier experience had a profound influence on the development
+of the American philosophy of pragmatism. Turner claimed
+that it was "to the frontier" that "the American intellect owe[d] its
+striking characteristics."<a name="FNanchor_12_318" id="FNanchor_12_318"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_318" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> And the Fair Play settlers showed that</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>... coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and inquisitiveness;
+that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick
+to find expedients; that masterful grasp of material things,
+lacking in the artistic but powerful to effect great ends; that
+restless, nervous energy; that dominant individualism, working
+for good and for evil, and withal that buoyancy and exuberance
+which comes with freedom....<a name="FNanchor_13_319" id="FNanchor_13_319"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_319" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>The frontiersman of the West Branch was a free spirit in a free
+land, a doer rather than a thinker, more concerned with the "hows"
+than the "whys" of survival. This practical approach to problems
+can be seen in the homes he built, the tools he made, the clothes
+he wore, the political and social systems under which he operated, and
+the set of values by which he was motivated. The development of
+these characteristic American traits owed much to the frontier and
+the new experiences which it offered.</p>
+
+<p>This ethnographic analysis of the Fair Play settlers of the West
+Branch Valley has attempted to present a clearer picture of the "style
+of life" on this particular frontier and, in so doing, to suggest a further
+technique for the frontier historian. There are, no doubt, certain
+defects in this specific study, but the fault lies with the limitations
+of the data rather than the technique. The scope of this investigation
+has carried into questions of geography, demography, politics,
+economics, social systems, and leadership. Unfortunately, the frontier
+had not yet provided the leisure essential to artistic and aesthetic pursuits.
+Consequently, these areas were given a limited treatment. Furthermore,
+the mythology and folklore of this valley offered little of
+record. However, the breadth of this analysis has furnished evidence
+of the existence of democracy on this frontier and, thus, support for
+Turner's thesis, or at least for this interpretation of it.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The geographic analysis has clarified the question of the Tiadaghton,
+demonstrating that Lycoming Creek, rather than Pine Creek, was the
+true eastern boundary of the Fair Play territory. The substantial
+destruction of an erroneous legend has been the main contribution
+of the geographic part of this study.<a name="FNanchor_14_320" id="FNanchor_14_320"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_320" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> It is now clear that the Fair
+Play territory extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the
+West Branch of the Susquehanna River, to the Great Island, just
+east of Lock Haven. This frontier region was beyond the legal limit
+of settlement of the Province and the Commonwealth from 1769
+to 1784. Hence, within its limits was formed the extra-legal political
+system known as Fair Play.</p>
+
+<p>The demographic portion of this study has added to the undermining
+of the frontier myth of the Scotch-Irish. The evidence presented
+here indicates that it was the frontier, rather than national
+origin, which affected the behavior of the pioneers of the West
+Branch Valley. The Fair Play settlers, a mixed population of seven
+national stock groups, reacted similarly to the common problems of
+the frontier experience. In one important exception, the Fair Play
+system itself, there is, however, an apparent contradiction. Since no
+account of any "fair play system" has turned up in the annals of
+the Cumberland Valley, the American reservoir of the Scotch-Irish,
+it seems quite probable that the "system" originated in either Northern
+Ireland or Scotland, or else on the frontier itself. This probability
+offers good ground for further study, particularly when the existence
+of a similar "system" in Greene County, which was found in conjunction
+with this investigation, is considered.<a name="FNanchor_15_321" id="FNanchor_15_321"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_321" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> If the Fair Play system
+originated on the frontier, why did not it also appear on the Virginia
+and Carolina frontiers where the Scotch-Irish predominated? Regardless,
+the lack of data corroborating the American origin of the Fair
+Play system leads to the conclusion that the germ of this political
+organization was brought to this country by the Scotch-Irish from
+their cultural heritage, and that those elements were found usable
+under the frontier conditions of both central and southwestern Pennsylvania.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span>
+If so, the politics of "fair play" will add to, rather than detract
+from, the myth of the Scotch-Irish.</p>
+
+<p>This study has also brought forward the first complete account of
+court records validating the activities of the Fair Play men. Mainly
+concerned with the adjudication of land questions, this frontier tribunal
+developed an unwritten code which encompassed the problems
+of settlement, tenure, and ejectment. Subsequently reviewed in the
+regular courts of the counties of which the Fair Play territory became
+a part, these cases provide substantial evidence of the existence of a
+"system" as well as insight into the manner of its operation. The
+fairness of the Fair Play system is marked by the fact that none of the
+decisions of its tribunal was later reversed in the established county
+courts. Supplemented by the Committee of Safety for Northumberland
+County and augmented by peripheral leaders, who gave them a
+voice in the higher councils of the State, the Fair Play men and their
+government proved adequate to the needs of the settlers, until all
+were driven off in the Great Runaway of 1778.</p>
+
+<p>Some corroboration for the legendary tale of a "Fair Play Declaration
+of Independence" was found in the course of this study. Although
+consisting, in the main, of accounts culled from the records of
+Revolutionary War pension claimants made some eighty years after
+the event, the evidence is that of a contemporary.<a name="FNanchor_16_322" id="FNanchor_16_322"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_322" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> However, the
+most common objection to this conclusion, that the Fair Play declaration
+was merely the reading of a copy of Jefferson's Declaration,
+is unsubstantiated by the archival descriptions.<a name="FNanchor_17_323" id="FNanchor_17_323"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_323" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> Perhaps the Fair
+Play declaration is apocryphal, but, lacking valid disclaimers, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span>
+Hamilton data offer some basis for a judgment. It is the tentative
+conclusion of this writer that there was such a declaration on the
+banks of Pine Creek in July of 1776.</p>
+
+<p>The Fair Play territory was truly "an area of free land" in which
+a "new order of Americanism" emerged.<a name="FNanchor_18_324" id="FNanchor_18_324"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_324" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> Individualistic and self-reliant
+of necessity, the pioneers of this farmers' frontier rationally
+developed their solution to the problem of survival in the wilderness,
+a democratic squatter sovereignty. With land readily available
+and a free labor system to work it, provided that the family was
+large enough to assure sufficient "hands," these agrarian frontiersmen
+not only cultivated the soil but also a free society. And their cooperative
+spirit, despite their mixed national origins, was markedly
+noticeable at harvesttime. From such spirit are communities formed,
+and from such communities a democratic society emerges.</p>
+
+<p>This analysis has not only described the geography and demography,
+the politics and economics of the Fair Play settlers; it has also examined
+the basis and structure of this society, including the value
+system which undergirded it. The results have pictured the religious
+liberty extant in a frontier society isolated from any regular or established
+church, a liberty of conscience which left each man free to
+worship according to the dictates of his own faith. This freedom,
+this right to choose for himself, made the Fair Play settler surprisingly
+receptive to other groups and their practices, practices which he was
+free to reject, and often did.<a name="FNanchor_19_325" id="FNanchor_19_325"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_325" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> This analysis has also pointed up the
+class structure and its significance in promoting order in a frontier
+community. And finally, an examination of the value system of these
+Pennsylvania pioneers has provided an understanding of why they
+behaved as they did.</p>
+
+<p>The last major aspect of this investigation concerned the nature of
+leadership. Determined by the people, and thus essentially democratic,
+it had certain peculiar characteristics. In the first place, the
+top leaders tended to come from the Fair Play community in its
+broadest social sense, but not from the Fair Play territory in its narrow<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span>
+geographic sense.<a name="FNanchor_20_326" id="FNanchor_20_326"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_326" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> Secondly, the political participation of the
+Fair Play settlers, if office-holding is any criterion, emphasizes the
+high degree of involvement in terms of the total population.<a name="FNanchor_21_327" id="FNanchor_21_327"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_327" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> And
+last, this leadership appeared to be overextended when faced with the
+problem of defending its own frontier and the new nation which was
+striving so desperately for independence. Consequently, it was forced
+to turn to established government for support. This may have been
+the embryonic beginning of the nationalism which the frontier fostered
+in later generations.</p>
+
+<p>What then, is the meaning of this particular study, an ethnographic
+interpretation of Turner's thesis? Turner himself, gave the best argument
+for ethnography. He said that</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>... the economist, the political scientist, the psychologist,
+the sociologist, the geographer, the student of literature,
+of art, of religion&mdash;all the allied laborers in the study of society&mdash;have
+contributions to make to the equipment of the
+historian. These contributions are partly of material, partly
+of tools, partly of new points of view, new hypotheses, new
+suggestions of relations, causes, and emphasis. Each of these
+special students is in some danger of bias by his particular
+point of view, by his exposure to see simply the thing in which
+he is primarily interested, and also by his effort to deduce the
+universal laws of his separate science. The historian, on the
+other hand, is exposed to the danger of dealing with the complex
+and interacting social forces of a period or of a country
+from some single point of view to which his special training
+or interest inclines him. If the truth is to be made
+known, the historian must so far familiarize himself with the
+work, and equip himself with the training of his sister-subjects
+that he can at least avail himself of their results
+and in some reasonable degree master the essential tools of
+their trade.<a name="FNanchor_22_328" id="FNanchor_22_328"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_328" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p></div>
+
+<p>Frontier ethnography is just such an effort.</p>
+
+<p>The frontier ethnographer then, because of his interdisciplinary approach,
+can capture the spirit of pioneer life. And if, as Turner suggested,
+the frontier explains American development, then frontier<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span>
+ethnography presents an understanding of the American ethos with
+its ideals of discovery, democracy, and individualism.<a name="FNanchor_23_329" id="FNanchor_23_329"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_329" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> These ideals
+characterize "the American spirit and the meaning of America in
+world history."<a name="FNanchor_24_330" id="FNanchor_24_330"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_330" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p>
+
+<p>The ideal of discovery, "the courageous determination to break new
+paths," as Turner called it, was abundantly evident in the Fair Play
+territory of the West Branch Valley.<a name="FNanchor_25_331" id="FNanchor_25_331"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_331" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> This innovating spirit can be
+seen in the piercing of the Provincial boundary, despite the restrictive
+legislation to the contrary, and the establishment of homes in Indian
+territory.<a name="FNanchor_26_332" id="FNanchor_26_332"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_332" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> It was also demonstrated in a marvelous adaptability in
+solving the new problems of the frontier, problems for which the old
+dogmas were no longer applicable. The new world of the Susquehanna
+frontier made new men, Americans.</p>
+
+<p>Self-determination, the ideal of democracy as we have defined it,
+was the cornerstone of Fair Play society. Its particular contribution
+was the Fair Play "system" with its popularly elected tribunal of Fair
+Play men. Perhaps this was the proper antecedent of the commission
+form of local government which came into vogue on the progressive
+wave of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
+Regardless, the geographic limitations of the Fair Play territory, the
+frequency of elections, and the open conduct of meetings tend to
+substantiate the democratic evaluation which has been made of the
+politics of this frontier community. Furthermore, as was pointed out
+in the last chapter, this self-determination was the key characteristic
+of the economic and social life of these people.<a name="FNanchor_27_333" id="FNanchor_27_333"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_333" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p>
+
+<p>The pioneer ideal of creative and competitive individualism, which
+Turner considered America's best contribution to history and to
+progress, was an essential of the frontier experience which became an
+integral part of the American mythology.<a name="FNanchor_28_334" id="FNanchor_28_334"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_334" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> The "myth of the happy
+yeoman," as one historian called it, is still revered in American folklore
+and respected in American politics, whether it is outmoded or
+not.<a name="FNanchor_29_335" id="FNanchor_29_335"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_335" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> The primitive nature of frontier life developed this characteristically<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span>
+American trait and the family, the basic organization of social
+control, promoted it. It was this promotion, with its antipathy to any
+outside control, which stimulated the Revolution, creating an American
+nation from an already existing American character.</p>
+
+<p>The individualism of the West Branch frontier is also apparent in
+the administration of justice. The Fair Play system emphasized the
+personality of law, by its very title, rather than the organized machinery
+of justice.<a name="FNanchor_30_336" id="FNanchor_30_336"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_336" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> Frontier law was personal and direct, resulting in
+the unchecked development of the individual, a circumstance which
+Turner considered the significant product of this frontier democracy.<a name="FNanchor_31_337" id="FNanchor_31_337"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_337" class="fnanchor">[31]</a>
+Being personal, though, it had meaning for those affected by it, as
+an anecdote noted earlier indicated.<a name="FNanchor_32_338" id="FNanchor_32_338"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_338" class="fnanchor">[32]</a></p>
+
+<p>Individualism has become somewhat of an anachronism in a mass
+society, but its obsolescence today is part of the current American
+tragedy. The buoyant self-confidence which it inspired has made much
+of the American dream a reality. Legislation, it is true, has taken the
+place of free lands as the means of preserving democracy, but it will
+be a hollow triumph if that legislation suppresses this essential trait
+of the American character, its individualism. No intelligent person
+today would recommend a return to the laissez-faire individualism
+of the Social Darwinists of the late nineteenth century, but it must be
+admitted that a society emphasizing the worth of the individual and
+dedicated to principles of justice and fair play, the banner under
+which the frontiersmen of the West Branch operated, has genuine
+merit.</p>
+
+<p>Whether the historian is analyzing old frontiers or charting new
+ones, the timeless question remains: does man have the intelligence
+adequate to secure his own survival? The old frontiers, such as the
+Fair Play territory of the West Branch of the Susquehanna, were
+free lands of opportunity for a better life, and the history of the
+westward movement of the American people gives ample proof of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span>
+their conquest. But the new frontiers are not so clearly marked or
+so easily conquered. Perhaps a re-examination of the history of the
+old frontiers can give increased meaning to the problems of the new.
+This investigation was attempted, in part, to serve such a purpose.</p>
+
+<p>The intelligent solution to the problem of survival for the pioneers
+of the West Branch Valley was fair play. The ethnography of the
+Fair Play settlers is the record of the democratic development of an
+American community under the impact of the new experience of the
+frontier.</p>
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_307" id="Footnote_1_307"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_307"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> P. 2.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_308" id="Footnote_2_308"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_308"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> <i>The Oxford Universal Dictionary</i> (Oxford, 1955), p. 637.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_309" id="Footnote_3_309"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_309"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Solon and Elizabeth Buck, <i>The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania</i>
+(Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431 and 451.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_310" id="Footnote_4_310"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_310"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> <i>See</i>, for example, Dunaway, <i>A History of Pennsylvania</i>, p. 146, and <i>The Scotch-Irish
+of Colonial Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 159-160; <i>also</i>, Leyburn, <i>The Scotch-Irish</i>, p. 306.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_311" id="Footnote_5_311"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_311"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, p. 1.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_312" id="Footnote_6_312"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_312"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#CHAPTER_TWO">Chapter Two</a>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_313" id="Footnote_7_313"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_313"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Quoted by Ray Allen Billington in his introduction to Turner, <i>Frontier and
+Section</i>, p. 5.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_314" id="Footnote_8_314"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_314"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 217-218, 518-522.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_315" id="Footnote_9_315"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_315"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> This pride was notably demonstrated in the insistence of the Fair Play settlers
+that a stand be made at Fort Augusta following the Great Runaway. Previous
+to this, they had pleaded for support for "our Common Cause" in the defense
+of this frontier. <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, III, 217.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_316" id="Footnote_10_316"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_316"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> <i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, Second Series, X, 27-31, 417, and Fifth Series, II, 29-35.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_317" id="Footnote_11_317"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_317"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Quoted in Clinton Rossiter, <i>The First American Revolution</i> (New York, 1956),
+pp. 4-5.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_318" id="Footnote_12_318"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_318"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, p. 37.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_319" id="Footnote_13_319"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_319"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_320" id="Footnote_14_320"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_320"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> <i>See also</i>, George D. Wolf, "The Tiadaghton Question," <i>The Lock Haven Review</i>,
+Series I, No. 5 (1963), 61-71.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_321" id="Footnote_15_321"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_321"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Buck, <i>The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania</i>, pp. 431, 451.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_322" id="Footnote_16_322"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_322"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Anna Jackson Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions,
+Dec. 16, 1858, Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical Society.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_323" id="Footnote_17_323"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_323"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> <i>Colonial Records</i>, X, 634-635. The following resolution of Congress was entered
+in the minutes of the Council of Safety on July 5, 1776:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Resolved</i>, That Copies of the Declaration be sent to the several Assemblies,
+Conventions, and Councils of Safety, and to the several Commanding
+Officers of the Continental Troops, that it be proclaimed in each of
+the United States, and at the Head of the Army.</p>
+<p class="bqauthor">By order of Congress.<br />
+sign'd, JOHN HANCOCK, Presid't.</p></div>
+<p>Provision was also made for the reading in Philadelphia at 12 noon on July 8, and
+letters were sent to Bucks, Chester, Northampton, Lancaster, and Berks counties
+with copies of the Declaration to be posted on Monday the 8th where elections for
+delegates were to be held. For some reason, the frontier counties of Bedford, Cumberland,
+Westmoreland, York, and Northumberland, contiguous to the Fair Play
+territory, were omitted from these instructions.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_324" id="Footnote_18_324"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_324"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, pp. 1, 18.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_325" id="Footnote_19_325"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_325"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> <i>The Journal of William Colbert</i> gives frequent testimony to this statement,
+as indicated in <a href="#CHAPTER_FIVE">Chapter Five</a>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_326" id="Footnote_20_326"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_326"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> <i>See</i> the <a href="#Page_x">map</a> in Chapter One for the geographic boundaries of the Fair Play
+territory. Note the location of the top leaders, Henry and Frederick Antes and
+Robert Fleming, in <a href="#CHAPTER_SIX">Chapter Six</a>.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_327" id="Footnote_21_327"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_327"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> The number of different office-holders runs to better than ten per cent of the
+population.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_328" id="Footnote_22_328"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_328"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, pp. 333-334.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_329" id="Footnote_23_329"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_329"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, pp. 306-307.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_330" id="Footnote_24_330"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_330"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, p. 306.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_331" id="Footnote_25_331"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_331"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_332" id="Footnote_26_332"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_332"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Meginness, <i>Otzinachson</i> (1857), pp. 163-164.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_333" id="Footnote_27_333"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_333"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#CHAPTER_SEVEN">Chapter Seven</a> for an evaluation of "Democracy on the Pennsylvania
+Frontier."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_334" id="Footnote_28_334"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_334"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, p. 307.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_335" id="Footnote_29_335"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_335"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Richard Hofstadter, "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," <i>American Heritage</i>,
+VII, No. 3 (April, 1956), 43-53.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_336" id="Footnote_30_336"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_336"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> The term "the personality of the law" is Turner's and emphasizes the men who
+carried out the law, rather than its structure. The fact that the ruling tribunal of
+the West Branch Valley was referred to as the "Fair Play men" rather than the
+"tribunal" illustrates this contention.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_337" id="Footnote_31_337"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_337"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Turner, <i>The Frontier in American History</i>, pp. 253-254.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_338" id="Footnote_32_338"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_338"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> <i>See</i> <a href="#Page_37">Chapter Three, n. 24</a>.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="Bibliography" id="Bibliography"></a><i>Bibliography</i></h2>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2">BOOKS</h3>
+
+<p>Albion, Robert G. and Leonidas Dodson (eds.). <i>Philip Vickers Fithian: Journal,
+1775-1776.</i> Princeton, 1934.</p>
+
+<p>American Council of Learned Societies. "Report of the Committee on Linguistic
+and National Stocks in the Population of the United States," <i>Annual Report of
+the American Historical Association for the Year 1931</i>, I. Washington, 1932.</p>
+
+<p>Andrews, Charles M. <i>Colonial Folkways.</i> New Haven, 1919.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Guide to the Materials for American History to 1783 in the Public
+Record Office of Great Britain.</i> Washington, 1912.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash; and Frances G. Davenport. <i>Guide to the Manuscript Materials for
+the History of the United States to 1783, in the British Museum, in Minor London
+Archives, and in the Libraries of Oxford and Cambridge.</i> Washington, 1908.</p>
+
+<p>Barck, Oscar T., Jr., and Hugh T. Lefler. <i>Colonial America.</i> New York, 1958.</p>
+
+<p>Bates, Samuel P. <i>Greene County.</i> Chicago, 1888.</p>
+
+<p>Becker, Carl L. <i>Beginnings of the American People.</i> Ithaca, N. Y., 1960.</p>
+
+<p>Bell, Herbert. <i>History of Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.</i> Chicago, 1891.</p>
+
+<p>Billington, Ray Allen. <i>Westward Expansion.</i> New York, 1960.</p>
+
+<p>Boyd, Julian P., and Robert J. Taylor (eds.). <i>The Susquehanna Company Papers</i>,
+1750-1775. 6 vols. Ithaca, N. Y., 1962.</p>
+
+<p>Bridenbaugh, Carl and Jessica. <i>Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in the Age
+of Franklin.</i> New York, 1962.</p>
+
+<p>Buck, Solon J. and Elizabeth H. <i>The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania.</i>
+Pittsburgh, 1939.</p>
+
+<p>Calhoun, Arthur W. <i>A Social History of the American Family</i>, I. New York, 1960.</p>
+
+<p>Cocks, Robert S. <i>One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The History of
+Northumberland Presbytery, 1811-1961.</i> 1961.</p>
+
+<p>Commager, Henry S. <i>Documents of American History</i>, I. New York, 1958.</p>
+
+<p>Crick, B. R. and Miriam Alman (eds.). <i>A Guide to Manuscripts Relating to
+America in Great Britain and Ireland.</i> New York, 1961.</p>
+
+<p>Curti, Merle, <i>et al.</i> <i>The Making of an American Community, A Case Study of
+Democracy in a Frontier County.</i> Stanford, 1959.</p>
+
+<p>Day, Richard E. (comp.). <i>Calendar of the Sir William Johnson Manuscripts in
+the New York State Library.</i> Albany, N. Y., 1909.</p>
+
+<p>DePuy, Henry F. <i>A Bibliography of the English Colonial Treaties with the
+American Indians including a Synopsis of Each Treaty.</i> New York, 1917.</p>
+
+<p>DeSchweinitz, Edmund A. <i>The Life and Times of David Zeisberger.</i> Philadelphia,
+1870.</p>
+
+<p>Doddridge, Joseph. <i>Notes on the Settlement and Indian Wars of the Western Parts
+of Virginia and Pennsylvania.</i> Pittsburgh, 1912.</p>
+
+<p>Dunaway, Wayland F. <i>A History of Pennsylvania.</i> Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1948.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania.</i> Chapel Hill, 1944.</p>
+
+<p>Egle, William H. <i>History of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.</i> Philadelphia,
+1883.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash; (ed.). <i>Historical Register: Notes and Queries, Historical and Genealogical,
+relating to Interior Pennsylvania</i>, 2 vols. Harrisburg, 1883-84.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Pennsylvania Genealogies; Scotch-Irish and German.</i> Harrisburg,
+1886, 1896.</p>
+
+<p>Frost, Robert. <i>Complete Poems of Robert Frost.</i> New York, 1949.</p>
+
+<p>Hall, Carrie A., and Rose G. Kretsinger. <i>The Romance of the Patchwork Quilt in
+America.</i> New York, 1935.</p>
+
+<p>Hanna, C. A. <i>The Scotch-Irish.</i> 2 vols. New York, 1902.</p>
+
+<p>Jones, U. J. <i>History of the Early Settlements of the Juniata Valley.</i> Philadelphia,
+1856.</p>
+
+<p>Klett, Guy S. <i>Presbyterians in Colonial Pennsylvania.</i> Philadelphia, 1937.</p>
+
+<p>Leopold, Richard W., and Arthur S. Link (eds.). <i>Problems in American History.</i>
+Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957.</p>
+
+<p>Leyburn, James G. <i>The Scotch-Irish: A Social History.</i> Chapel Hill, 1962.</p>
+
+<p>Lincoln, Charles A. (comp.). <i>Calendar of Sr. William Johnson Manuscripts in the
+Library of the American Antiquarian Society.</i> ("Transactions of the Society,"
+Vol. XI.) Worcester, 1906.</p>
+
+<p>Linn, John B. <i>History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania.</i> Philadelphia,
+1883.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Annals of Buffalo Valley.</i> Harrisburg, 1877.</p>
+
+<p>MacMinn, Edwin. <i>On the Frontier with Colonel Antes.</i> Camden, N. J., 1900.</p>
+
+<p>Maginnis, T. H., Jr. <i>The Irish Contribution to American Independence.</i> Philadelphia,
+1913.</p>
+
+<p>Martin, A. E., and H. H. Shenk. <i>Pennsylvania History Told by Contemporaries.</i>
+New York, 1925.</p>
+
+<p>Martindale, Don. <i>American Society.</i> New York, 1960.</p>
+
+<p>Maynard, D. S. <i>Historical View of Clinton County, from its Earliest Settlement to
+the Present Time.</i> Lock Haven, 1875.</p>
+
+<p>Meginness, John F. <i>Biographical Annals of the West Branch Valley.</i> Williamsport,
+1889.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>History of Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.</i> Chicago, 1872.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Otzinachson: or a History of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna.</i>
+Philadelphia, 1857.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna.</i>
+Williamsport, 1889.</p>
+
+<p>National Education Association. <i>The Education of Free Men in American Democracy.</i>
+Washington, 1941.</p>
+
+<p>O'Callaghan, E. B. <i>Documentary History of the State of New York</i>, I. Albany,
+N. Y., 1849.</p>
+
+<p><i>The Oxford Universal Dictionary.</i> Oxford, 1955.</p>
+
+<p>Parkes, Henry Bamford. <i>The American Experience.</i> New York, 1959.</p>
+
+<p>The Pennsylvania Writers' Project, Work Projects Administration. <i>A Picture of
+Clinton County.</i> Williamsport, 1942.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>A Picture of Lycoming County.</i> Williamsport, 1939.</p>
+
+<p>Proud, Robert. <i>History of Pennsylvania in North America.</i> 2 vols. Philadelphia,
+1797, 1798.</p>
+
+<p>Ranney, Austin, and Willmoore Kendall. <i>Democracy and the American Party System.</i>
+New York, 1956.</p>
+
+<p>Rossiter, Clinton. <i>The First American Revolution.</i> New York, 1956.</p>
+
+<p>Rothermund, Dietmar. <i>The Layman's Progress.</i> Philadelphia, 1961.</p>
+
+<p>Rupp, Israel D. (ed.). <i>A Collection of Thirty Thousand Names of German, Swiss,
+Dutch, French, Portuguese, and other Immigrants in Pennsylvania, Chronologically
+Arranged from 1727 to 1776.</i> Harrisburg, 1856.</p>
+
+<p>Sanderson, W. H. <i>Historical Reminiscences</i>, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker. Altoona,
+1920.</p>
+
+<p>Sergeant, Thomas. <i>View of the Land Laws of Pennsylvania with Notices of its
+Early History and Legislation.</i> Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, 1838.</p>
+
+<p>Shimmell, Lewis S. <i>Border Warfare in Pennsylvania During the Revolution.</i> Harrisburg,
+1901.</p>
+
+<p>Singmaster, Elsie. <i>Pennsylvania's Susquehanna.</i> Harrisburg, 1950.</p>
+
+<p>Smith, Charles. <i>Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania</i>, II. Philadelphia, 1810.</p>
+
+<p>Stevens, Benjamin F. <i>Catalogue Index of Manuscripts in the Archives of England,
+France, Holland, and Spain relating to America, 1763-1783.</i> London, 1870-1902.
+(In manuscript in the Library of Congress.)</p>
+
+<p>Stevens, Joseph. <i>History of the Presbytery of Northumberland.</i> Williamsport, 1881.</p>
+
+<p>Sullivan, James (ed.). <i>The Papers of Sir William Johnson</i>, I-III. Albany, 1921.</p>
+
+<p>Taylor, George R. <i>The Turner Thesis Concerning the Role of the Frontier in
+American History</i> ("Problems in American Civilization."). Boston, 1956.</p>
+
+<p>Theiss, Lewis E. "Early Agriculture," <i>Susquehanna Tales</i> (Sunbury, 1955), 88-89.</p>
+
+<p>Tome, Philip. <i>Pioneer Life; or Thirty Years a Hunter.</i> Harrisburg, 1928.</p>
+
+<p>Trinterud, Leonard J. <i>The Forming of an American Tradition: A Re-Examination
+of Colonial Presbyterianism.</i> Philadelphia, 1949.</p>
+
+<p>Turner, Frederick Jackson. <i>Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of Frederick
+Jackson Turner.</i> Intro. by Ray Allen Billington. Englewood, Cliffs, N. J., 1961.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>The Frontier in American History.</i> New York, 1963.</p>
+
+<p>Volwiler, Albert T. <i>George Croghan and the Westward Movement 1741-1783.</i>
+Cleveland, 1926.</p>
+
+<p>Wallace, Paul A. W. <i>Conrad Weiser.</i> Philadelphia, 1945.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Indians in Pennsylvania.</i> Harrisburg, 1961.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation.</i> New York, 1962.</p>
+
+<p>Webb, Walter Prescott. <i>The Great Plains.</i> New York, 1931.</p>
+
+<p>Wertenbaker, Thomas J. <i>The First Americans 1607-1690.</i> New York, 1962.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>The Founding of American Civilization: The Middle Colonies.</i> New
+York, 1949.</p>
+
+<p>Wittke, Carl. <i>We Who Built America.</i> 1963.</p>
+
+<p>Wright, J. E., and Doris S. Corbett. <i>Pioneer Life In Western Pennsylvania.</i> Pittsburgh,
+1940.</p>
+
+<p>Wright, Louis B. <i>Culture on the Moving Frontier.</i> Bloomington, Ind., 1955.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>The Atlantic Frontier.</i> New York, 1947.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>The Cultural Life of the American Colonies, 1607-1763.</i> New York,
+1957.</p>
+
+<p>Yeates, Jasper. <i>Pennsylvania Reports</i>, I. Philadelphia and St. Louis, 1871.</p>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2">PUBLIC DOCUMENTS</h3>
+
+<p><i>Appearance Docket Commencing 1797</i>, No. 2. Lycoming County, Office of the
+Prothonotor, Williamsport.</p>
+
+<p><i>Colonial Records</i>, IX. Harrisburg, 1852.</p>
+
+<p><i>Colonial Records</i>, X. Harrisburg, 1852.</p>
+
+<p><i>Colonial Records</i>, XI. Harrisburg, 1852.</p>
+
+<p><i>Colonial Records</i>, XII. Harrisburg, 1852.</p>
+
+<p><i>Colonial Records</i>, XX. Harrisburg, 1852.</p>
+
+<p><i>Pennsylvania Archives</i>, [First Series], XI. Philadelphia, 1855.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;, [First Series], XII. Philadelphia, 1856.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;, Second Series, II. Harrisburg, 1876.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;, Second Series, III. Harrisburg, 1875.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;, Second Series, XVII. Harrisburg, 1890.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;, Third Series, XI-XXII. Harrisburg, 1897.</p>
+
+<p><i>New Purchase Applications, Nos. 1823 and 2611</i>, April 3, 1769. Bureau of Land
+Records, Harrisburg.</p>
+
+<p><i>Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts of Pennsylvania.</i>
+Harrisburg, 1916.</p>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2">ARTICLES AND ESSAYS</h3>
+
+<p>Baelyn, Bernard. "Political Experiences and Enlightenment Ideas in Eighteenth-Century
+America," <i>American Historical Review</i>, LXVII (January, 1962), 339-351.</p>
+
+<p>Beck, Herbert H. "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania Rifle," <i>Papers
+Read Before the Lancaster County Historical Society</i>, LIII (1949), 33-61.</p>
+
+<p>Berger, Robert. "The Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County," <i>Now and
+Then</i>, XII (July, 1960), 274-280.</p>
+
+<p>Bertin, Eugene P. "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," <i>Now and Then</i>, VIII
+(October, 1947), 258-259.</p>
+
+<p>Carter, John H. "The Committee of Safety of Northumberland County," <i>The
+Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XVIII
+(1950), 33-54.</p>
+
+<p>Champagne, Roger. "Family Politics Versus Constitutional Principles: The New
+York Assembly Elections of 1768 and 1769," <i>William and Mary Quarterly</i>, Third
+Series, XX (January, 1963), 57-79.</p>
+
+<p>Clark, Chester. "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," <i>Northumberland County Historical
+Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, VII (1935), 16-44.</p>
+
+<p>Deans, John Bacon. "The Migration of the Connecticut Yankees to the West Branch
+of the Susquehanna River," <i>Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical
+Society</i> (1954), 34-55.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Diary of the Unknown Traveler," <i>Now and Then</i>, X (January, 1954), 307-313.</p>
+
+<p>"Eleanor Coldren's Depositions," <i>Now and Then</i>, XII (October, 1959), 220-222.</p>
+
+<p>Everett, F. B. "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+River," <i>Journal Presbyterian Historical Society</i>, XII (October, 1927), 481-485.</p>
+
+<p>Garrison, Hazel Shields. "Cartography of Pennsylvania Before 1800," <i>Pennsylvania
+Magazine of History and Biography</i>, LIX (July, 1935), 255-283.</p>
+
+<p>Gross, Rebecca F. "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven <i>Express</i> (August 3, 1963),
+4.</p>
+
+<p>Hofstadter, Richard. "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," <i>American Heritage</i>, VII
+(April, 1956), 43-53.</p>
+
+<p>Johns, John O. "July 4, 1776&mdash;Rediscovered." <i>Commonwealth: The Magazine for
+Pennsylvania</i>, II (July, 1948), 2-16.</p>
+
+<p>Jordan, John W. (contributor), "Spangenberg's Notes of Travel to Onondaga in
+1745," <i>Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography</i>, II (No. 4, 1878), 424-432.</p>
+
+<p>Klett, Guy S. "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along The Susquehanna River,"
+<i>Pennsylvania History</i>, XX (April, 1953), 165-179.</p>
+
+<p>Linn, John Blair. "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers, 1773-1785," <i>The Pennsylvania
+Magazine of History and Biography</i>, VII (No. 4, 1883), 420-425.</p>
+
+<p>"Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor, 1792, Found Among the Bingham
+Papers," <i>Now &amp; Then</i>, X. (July, 1952), 148-150.</p>
+
+<p>Meginness, John F. "The Scotch-Irish of the Upper Susquehanna Valley," <i>Scotch-Irish
+Society of America Proceedings and Addresses</i>, VIII (1897), 159-169.</p>
+
+<p>Neal, Don. "Freedom Outpost," <i>Pennsylvania Game News</i>, XXXI (July, 1960), 6-10.</p>
+
+<p>Russell, Helen Herritt. "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and Their
+Government," <i>Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical Society</i>,
+XXII (1958), 16-43.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. "The Great Runaway of 1778," <i>The Journal of the Lycoming Historical
+Society</i>, II (No. 4, 1961), 3-10.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. "The Great Runaway of 1778," <i>The Northumberland County Historical
+Society Proceedings and Addresses</i>, XXIII (1960), 1-16.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," <i>Proceedings
+of the Northumberland County Historical Society</i>, XXII (1958), 1-15.</p>
+
+<p>Silver, James W. (ed.). "An Autobiographical Sketch of Chauncey Brockway,"
+<i>Pennsylvania History</i>, XXV (April, 1958), 137-161.</p>
+
+<p>Stille, C. J. "Pennsylvania and the Declaration of Independence," <i>Pennsylvania
+Magazine of History and Biography</i>, XIII (No. 4, 1889), 385-429.</p>
+
+<p>Wallace, Paul A. W., Excerpt from letter, Sept. 2, 1952, <i>Now and Then</i>, X (October,
+1952), 184.</p>
+
+<p>Wilkinson, Norman B. (ed.). "Mr. Davy's Diary," <i>Now and Then</i>, X (April, 1954),
+336-343.</p>
+
+<p>Williams, E. Melvin. "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," <i>Americana</i> XVII (1923),
+374-387.</p>
+
+<p>Williams, Richmond D. "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778," <i>Now and
+Then</i>, XII (April, 1960), 258-259.</p>
+
+<p>Wolf, George D. "The Tiadaghton Question," <i>The Lock Haven Review</i>, Series I,
+No. 5 (1963), 61-71.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Wood, T. Kenneth (ed.). "Journal of an English Emigrant Farmer," <i>Lycoming
+Historical Society Proceedings and Papers</i>, No. 6 (1928).</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash;. <i>Now and Then</i>, X (July, 1952), 148-150.</p>
+
+<p>&mdash;&mdash; (ed.). "Observations Made By John Bartram In His Travels From
+Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the Lake Ontario in 1743," <i>Now and
+Then</i>, V (1936), 90.</p>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2">UNPUBLISHED STUDIES</h3>
+
+<p>Turner, Morris K. "The Commercial Relations of the Susquehanna Valley During
+the Colonial Period." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania,
+1916.</p>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2"><i>MANUSCRIPTS</i></h3>
+
+<h3>MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS</h3>
+
+<p>Zebulon Butler Papers, Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre,
+Pennsylvania.</p>
+
+<p>Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary, 1716-1791 (microfilm, 2 reels). The Pennsylvania
+Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.</p>
+
+<p>Journal of William Colbert (typescript). Property of the Rev. Charles F. Berkheimer
+of Williamsport, Pa. Original (1792-1794) at the Garrett Biblical Seminary,
+Chicago. (Copy also at Lycoming College, Williamsport.)</p>
+
+<p>Revolutionary War Pension Claims (typescript). Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical
+Society and Museum of History, Muncy, Pa.</p>
+
+
+<h3 class="moretop2">PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE</h3>
+
+<p>Mrs. Solon J. Buck, Washington, D. C, June 22, 1963, to the author.</p>
+
+<p>Alfred P. James, Pittsburgh, July 16, 1963, to the author.</p>
+
+<p>Peter Marshall, Berkeley, Calif., May 19, 1962, to the author.</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, Collegeville, Pa., October 21, 1962, to the author.</p>
+
+<p>Paul A. W. Wallace, Harrisburg, February 16, 1961, July 30, August 24, and December
+17, 1962, to the author.</p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="Index" id="Index"></a><i>Index</i></h2>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Adlum, John, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li>
+
+<li>Alexander, James, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Allegheny Mountains, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Allison, Rev. Francis, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li><a name="American_Revolution" id="American_Revolution"></a>American Revolution, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, Frederick, <a href="#Page_77">77-82</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, Henry, Jr., <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76-83</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, Henry, Sr., <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, Joseph, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, Philip, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes, William, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Antes Mill, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li>
+
+<li>Art, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
+
+<li>Arthur, Robert, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Atlee, Samuel J., <a href="#Page_5">5</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Bald Eagle Creek, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li>
+
+<li>Bald Eagle Mountains, <a href="#Page_14">14</a></li>
+
+<li>Bald Eagle Township, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
+
+<li>Bald Eagle's Nest, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Baptists, <a href="#Page_68">68</a></li>
+
+<li>Barn-raisings, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li>
+
+<li>Bartram, John, <a href="#Page_9">9-11</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li>
+
+<li>Bertin, Eugene P., <a href="#Page_7">7</a></li>
+
+<li>"Beulah Land," <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
+
+<li>Bingham, William, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
+
+<li>Blackwell, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
+
+<li>Bonner, Barnabas, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Books, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
+
+<li>Brainerd, Rev. David, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Bryce, James, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></li>
+
+<li>Bucks County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></li>
+
+<li>Burnet's Hills, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>"Cabin right," <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li>
+
+<li>Cabin-raisings, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li>
+
+<li>Caldwell, Bratton, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Calhoune, George, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Cammal, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
+
+<li>Campbell, Cleary, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li>
+
+<li>Campbell, William, Jr., <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Carlisle Presbytery, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Charter of Privileges, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Chester County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>Children, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li>
+
+<li>Clark, Francis, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
+
+<li>Clark, John, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Colbert, William, <a href="#Page_61">61-63</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
+
+<li>Coldren, Eleanor, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Commerce, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></li>
+
+<li>Committee of Safety, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81-83</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Connecticut, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
+
+<li>Constitutional Convention, Pennsylvania (1776), <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li>
+
+<li>Continental Congress, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
+
+<li>Cooke, William, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>"Corn right," <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li>
+
+<li>Council of Safety, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li>
+
+<li>Covenhoven, Robert, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li>
+
+<li>Crawford, James, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
+
+<li>Cruger, Daniel, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Culbertson, Mr., <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Cumberland County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>Cumberland Valley, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Curti, Merle, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Dauphin County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>Davy, Mr., <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li>
+
+<li><a name="Declaration_of_Independence" id="Declaration_of_Independence"></a>Declaration of Independence, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>"Declaration of Independence" of Fair Play Settlers, <a href="#Page_42">42-44</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Defense, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li>
+
+<li>Demography, <a href="#Page_16">16-29</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104-107</a></li>
+
+<li>DeSchweinitz, Edmund A., <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
+
+<li>Dewitt, Abraham, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Dewitt, Peter, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Dickinson, John, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li>
+
+<li>Donegal Presbytery, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Dougherty, Samuel, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Drinking, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li>
+
+<li>Duncan, Mr., <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li>
+
+<li>Dunn, William, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li><a name="Economic_institutions" id="Economic_institutions"></a>Economic institutions, <a href="#Page_89">89-91</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99-102</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>;
+<ul><li><i>see also</i> <a href="#Transcribers_Endnotes">Farming</a></li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Education, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li>
+
+<li>Ejectment, <a href="#Page_35">35-39</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span></li>
+
+<li>English, <a href="#Page_16">16-20</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24-26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Ettwein, Bishop John, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li>
+
+<li>Evans, Lewis, <a href="#Page_9">9-11</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li><a name="Fair_Play_men" id="Fair_Play_men"></a>Fair Play men, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35-36</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81-83</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>;
+<ul><li><i>see also</i> <a href="#Tribunal_Fair_Play">Tribunal, Fair Play</a></li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Faith, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li>
+
+<li>Family life, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li>
+
+<li>Ferguson, Thomas, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Fithian, Philip Vickers, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li>
+
+<li>Fleming, Betsey, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li>
+
+<li>Fleming, John, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li>
+
+<li>Fleming, Robert, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li>
+
+<li>Forster, Thomas, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Antes, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Augusta, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Fleming, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Horn, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82-84</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Muncy, <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Reed, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li>
+
+<li>Fort Stanwix, Treaties of, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5-9</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
+
+<li>Forts, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81-83</a></li>
+
+<li>Franklin, Benjamin, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li>
+
+<li>French, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16-18</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>French and Indian War, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Galbreath, Robert, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
+
+<li>General Assembly, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>George III, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
+
+<li>Germans, <a href="#Page_16">16-20</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24-26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82-84</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Germantown, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
+
+<li>Great Island, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Great Runaway <a href="#Page_21">21-23</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Great Shamokin Path, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Greene County, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Grier, Rev. Isaac, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Grier, James, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li><i>Grier</i> vs. <i>Tharpe</i>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Gristmills, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Haines, Joseph, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Hamilton, Alexander, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li>
+
+<li>Hamilton, Anna Jackson, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Hamilton, John, <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li>
+
+<li>Hartley, Col. Thomas, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li>
+
+<li>Harvest, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Hill, Aaron, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
+
+<li>Homes, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li>
+
+<li>Horn, Samuel, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li>
+
+<li>Hospitality, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></li>
+
+<li>Huff, Edmund, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Huff-Latcha (Satcha) case, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li>
+
+<li>Huggins, Mr., <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li>
+
+<li>Hughes, James, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li>
+
+<li>Hughes, Thomas, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
+
+<li><i>Hughes</i> vs. <i>Dougherty</i>, <a href="#Page_36">36-40</a></li>
+
+<li>Hunter, Col. Samuel, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Immigration, <a href="#Page_19">19-21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li>
+
+<li>"Improvements," <a href="#Page_37">37-39</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li>
+
+<li>Indentured servitude, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li>
+
+<li>Independence, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>;<ul>
+<li><i>see also</i> <a href="#Declaration_of_Independence">Declaration of Independence</a></li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Indians, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21-24</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li>
+
+<li>Individualism, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li>
+
+<li>Industry, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li>
+
+<li>Intermarriage, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a></li>
+
+<li>Irish, <a href="#Page_16">16-18</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Irwin (Irvin), James, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Jamison, John, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Jersey Shore, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
+
+<li>Johnson, Sir William, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a></li>
+
+<li>Jones, Isaiah, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Juniata Valley, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Kemplen, Thomas, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Kendall, Willmoore, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li>
+
+<li>Kincaid, Mr., <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
+
+<li>King, Robert, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>King, William, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Labor, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Lancaster, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
+
+<li>Lancaster County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li>
+
+<li>Land claims, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38-40</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92-94</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Land Office, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li>
+
+<li>Larrys Creek, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a></li>
+
+<li>Latcha, Jacob, <a href="#Page_40">40</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span></li>
+
+<li>Law, unwritten, <a href="#Page_37">37-39</a></li>
+
+<li>Leadership, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76-88</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li>
+
+<li>Lewisburg, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Leyburn, James G., <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li>
+
+<li>"Limping Messenger," <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
+
+<li>Linn, John Blair, <a href="#Page_5">5-7</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Lock Haven, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Locke, John, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
+
+<li>Logan, James, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li>
+
+<li>Long, Cookson, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
+
+<li>Love, Robert, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Lycoming Church, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Lycoming County courts, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li>
+
+<li>Lycoming Creek <a href="#Page_2">2-6</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9-15</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Lycoming <i>Gazette</i>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li>
+
+<li>Lycoming Township, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li>
+
+<li>Lydius, John Henry, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>McElhattan, Pa., <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
+
+<li>McElhattan, William, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>McKean, Thomas, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li>
+
+<li>McMeans, William, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>MacMinn, Edwin, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Manning, Richard, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
+
+<li>Marshall, Peter, <a href="#Page_12">12</a></li>
+
+<li>Martin, John, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Maynard, D. S., <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a></li>
+
+<li>Medical practices, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
+
+<li>Meginness, John, <a href="#Page_4">4-7</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Methodists, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li>
+
+<li>Milesburg, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Military service, <a href="#Page_38">38-41</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li>
+
+<li>Milton, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li>
+
+<li>Ministers, itinerant, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></li>
+
+<li>Missionaries, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Montgomery County, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Montour, Andrew, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
+
+<li>Montoursville; <i>see</i> <a href="#Ostonwaken">Ostonwaken</a></li>
+
+<li>Moravians, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Muhlenberg, Henry, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Muhlenberg, Hiester H., <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
+
+<li>Muncy, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></li>
+
+<li>Muncy Creek, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>Muncy Hills, <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li>
+
+<li>Music, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>National origins, <a href="#Page_16">16-18</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Nationalism, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li>
+
+<li>New Hampshire, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
+
+<li>New Jersey, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>"New Purchase," <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></li>
+
+<li>New York, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
+
+<li>Newspapers, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li>
+
+<li>Niagara, N. Y., <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li>
+
+<li>Nippenose Valley, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li>
+
+<li>Nittany Valley, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Northumberland County, <a href="#Page_24">24-26</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Northumberland County courts, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li>
+
+<li>Northumberland <i>Gazette</i>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li>
+
+<li>Northumberland Presbytery, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Office holding, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li>
+
+<li>"Old Purchase," <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
+
+<li><a name="Onondaga" id="Onondaga"></a>Onondaga (Syracuse), N. Y., <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
+
+<li>Orange County, N. Y., <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li><a name="Ostonwaken" id="Ostonwaken"></a>Ostonwaken (Montoursville), <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Paine, Thomas, <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li>
+
+<li>Parr, James, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
+
+<li>Patriotism, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73-75</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
+
+<li>Paul, William, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Pennamite Wars, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+
+<li>Petitions, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
+
+<li>Philadelphia, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li>
+
+<li>Philadelphia County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li>
+
+<li>Pine Creek, <a href="#Page_2">2-15</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Pine Creek Church, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
+
+<li>Pine Creek Township, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li>
+
+<li>Plymouth Colony, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
+
+<li>Political equality, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li>
+
+<li>Pottstown, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Pragmatism, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li>
+
+<li>"Praying societies," <a href="#Page_66">66</a></li>
+
+<li>Pre-emption, <a href="#Page_27">27-29</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
+
+<li>Presbyterianism, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61-63</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65-69</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Price, John, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
+
+<li>Proclamation of 1763, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a></li>
+
+<li>Property right, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Quilting, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Ranney, Austin, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li>
+
+<li>Read, Mr., <a href="#Page_38">38</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span></li>
+
+<li>Recreation, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li>
+
+<li>Reed, William, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
+
+<li>Religion, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91-93</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Revolution; <i>see</i> <a href="#American_Revolution">American Revolution</a></li>
+
+<li>Rhode Island, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Roads, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Rodey, Peter, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Schebosh, John, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></li>
+
+<li>Scotch-Irish, <a href="#Page_16">16-21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28-30</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57-60</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63-65</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70-72</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82-84</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Scots, <a href="#Page_16">16-18</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Self-determination, <a href="#Page_89">89-91</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97-99</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li>
+
+<li>Self-reliance, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Self-sufficiency, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56-58</a></li>
+
+<li>Sergeant, Thomas, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
+
+<li>Settlement, <a href="#Page_35">35-37</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Sheshequin Path, <a href="#Page_8">8-10</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li>
+
+<li>Shickellamy, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
+
+<li>Shippen, Justice Edward, <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li>
+
+<li>Singmaster, Elsie, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li>
+
+<li>Slavery, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li>
+
+<li>Smith, Charles, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li>
+
+<li>Smith, Daniel, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li>
+
+<li>Social compact, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></li>
+
+<li>Social structure, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99-101</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li>
+
+<li>Sour's ferry, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li>
+
+<li>Spangenburg, Bishop Augustus, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8-10</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Squatters' rights, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Stover, Martin, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
+
+<li>Suffrage, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
+
+<li>Sunbury, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47-49</a></li>
+
+<li>Supreme Court, Pennsylvania, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li>
+
+<li>Supreme Executive Council, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li>
+
+<li>Sweeney, Morgan, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Syracuse, N. Y.; <i>see</i> <a href="#Onondaga">Onondaga</a>, N. Y.</li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Tax lists, <a href="#Page_25">25-27</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Temperance, <a href="#Page_73">73-75</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li>
+
+<li>Tenancy, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95-97</a></li>
+
+<li>Tenure, land, <a href="#Page_37">37-40</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li>
+
+<li>Tiadaghton Creek, <a href="#Page_2">2-14</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>"Tiadaghton Elm," <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
+
+<li>Tilghman, James, <a href="#Page_12">12</a></li>
+
+<li>"Tomahawk right," <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li>
+
+<li>Toner, John, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
+
+<li>Tools, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li>
+
+<li><a name="Tribunal_Fair_Play" id="Tribunal_Fair_Play"></a>Tribunal, Fair Play, <a href="#Page_32">32-36</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>;<ul>
+<li><i>see also</i> <a href="#Fair_Play_men">Fair Play men</a></li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Turner, Frederick Jackson, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99-102</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Values, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97-100</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li>
+
+<li>Virginia, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li>
+
+<li>Voluntary associations, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60-62</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Walker, John, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li>
+
+<li>Wallace, Paul A. W., <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li>
+
+<li>Weiser, Conrad, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9-11</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li>
+
+<li>Welsh, <a href="#Page_16">16-18</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li>
+
+<li>Whitefield, George, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+
+<li>Williamsport, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li>
+
+<li>Wills, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li>
+
+<li>Winters Massacre, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li>
+
+<li>Women, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li>
+
+<li>Wyoming Massacre, <a href="#Page_21">21-23</a></li>
+
+<li>Wyoming Valley, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>York County, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<ul><li>Zeisberger, David, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
+
+<li>Zinzendorf, Nicholas von, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<div class="trans1"><p class="trnhd"><a name="Transcribers_Endnotes" id="Transcribers_Endnotes"></a>Transcriber's Endnotes</p>
+
+<p>Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.</p>
+
+<p>Archaic spellings in quoted material have been retained.</p>
+
+<p>The following discrepancies have been noted and corrected where possible:</p>
+<ul>
+<li>Page <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, Chart 4. The data in column headed '1774' does not tally with the total below. With no obvious solution, the table remains as originally published.</li>
+</ul><ul>
+<li>Footnote <a href="#Footnote_18_91">18</a>, Chapter 3. 'See nn. 6 and 7, p. 4.' Corrected to <i>See nn. 6 and 7, p. 33</i>.</li>
+</ul><ul>
+<li>Footnote <a href="#Footnote_20_93">20</a>, Chapter 3. 'Supra, p. 4.' Corrected to <i>Supra, p. 33.</i></li>
+</ul><ul>
+<li>Index entry '<a href="#Economic_institutions">Economic institutions</a>'. There is no index entry for '<i>Farming</i>', however the main references to farming can found in <a href="#CHAPTER_FOUR">Chapter Four</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West
+Branch Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 22471-h.htm or 22471-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        http://www.gutenberg.org/2/2/4/7/22471/
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/22471-h/images/010.png b/22471-h/images/010.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2c32ec7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-h/images/010.png
diff --git a/22471-h/images/010t.png b/22471-h/images/010t.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c104c15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-h/images/010t.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f001.png b/22471-page-images/f001.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7eabef1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f001.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f002.png b/22471-page-images/f002.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6388d81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f002.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f003.png b/22471-page-images/f003.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d0d3240
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f003.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f004.png b/22471-page-images/f004.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c762faa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f004.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f005.png b/22471-page-images/f005.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a52a7b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f005.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f006.png b/22471-page-images/f006.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5d7ee43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f006.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f007.png b/22471-page-images/f007.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2fe4a15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f007.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f008.png b/22471-page-images/f008.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46ecbaa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f008.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f009.png b/22471-page-images/f009.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c704a26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f009.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/f010.png b/22471-page-images/f010.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d5be99b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/f010.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p001.png b/22471-page-images/p001.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6a59865
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p001.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p002.png b/22471-page-images/p002.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dfe3df6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p002.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p003.png b/22471-page-images/p003.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..498f594
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p003.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p004.png b/22471-page-images/p004.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c6551ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p004.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p005.png b/22471-page-images/p005.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b72edfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p005.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p006.png b/22471-page-images/p006.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..229b436
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p006.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p007.png b/22471-page-images/p007.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49662cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p007.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p008.png b/22471-page-images/p008.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..629e602
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p008.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p009.png b/22471-page-images/p009.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..634d2f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p009.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p010.png b/22471-page-images/p010.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..69a02e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p010.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p011.png b/22471-page-images/p011.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cea1037
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p011.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p012.png b/22471-page-images/p012.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..20fa517
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p012.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p013.png b/22471-page-images/p013.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f94fe4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p013.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p014.png b/22471-page-images/p014.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..86498df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p014.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p015.png b/22471-page-images/p015.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad3a3cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p015.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p016.png b/22471-page-images/p016.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6947b88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p016.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p017.png b/22471-page-images/p017.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1973138
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p017.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p018.png b/22471-page-images/p018.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8be784
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p018.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p019.png b/22471-page-images/p019.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3a27dd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p019.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p020.png b/22471-page-images/p020.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..188ca62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p020.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p021.png b/22471-page-images/p021.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..119bea6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p021.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p022.png b/22471-page-images/p022.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..960acd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p022.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p023.png b/22471-page-images/p023.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..966fb92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p023.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p024.png b/22471-page-images/p024.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a7697fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p024.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p025.png b/22471-page-images/p025.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d521cea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p025.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p026.png b/22471-page-images/p026.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6172cd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p026.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p027.png b/22471-page-images/p027.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6e4121
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p027.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p028.png b/22471-page-images/p028.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e7f36c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p028.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p029.png b/22471-page-images/p029.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a268d98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p029.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p030.png b/22471-page-images/p030.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f7df672
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p030.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p031.png b/22471-page-images/p031.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3a5c65a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p031.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p032.png b/22471-page-images/p032.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a9c1266
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p032.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p033.png b/22471-page-images/p033.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2eba9bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p033.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p034.png b/22471-page-images/p034.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6a3b8dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p034.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p035.png b/22471-page-images/p035.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0a7306
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p035.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p036.png b/22471-page-images/p036.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6e14215
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p036.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p037.png b/22471-page-images/p037.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dfb6ec0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p037.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p038.png b/22471-page-images/p038.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..56d6e88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p038.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p039.png b/22471-page-images/p039.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c88d53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p039.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p040.png b/22471-page-images/p040.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c5f8e10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p040.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p041.png b/22471-page-images/p041.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13c8dfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p041.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p042.png b/22471-page-images/p042.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad3f310
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p042.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p043.png b/22471-page-images/p043.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd3c77b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p043.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p044.png b/22471-page-images/p044.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d7f3f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p044.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p045.png b/22471-page-images/p045.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b7b3d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p045.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p046.png b/22471-page-images/p046.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3002ad3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p046.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p047.png b/22471-page-images/p047.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..95b5df4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p047.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p048.png b/22471-page-images/p048.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..908982d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p048.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p049.png b/22471-page-images/p049.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5638be8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p049.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p050.png b/22471-page-images/p050.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b8ea3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p050.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p051.png b/22471-page-images/p051.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c852e7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p051.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p052.png b/22471-page-images/p052.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e198191
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p052.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p053.png b/22471-page-images/p053.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..04e3b0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p053.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p054.png b/22471-page-images/p054.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d9475fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p054.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p055.png b/22471-page-images/p055.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..070bd09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p055.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p056.png b/22471-page-images/p056.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..abb27c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p056.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p057.png b/22471-page-images/p057.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..708d3ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p057.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p058.png b/22471-page-images/p058.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..26d5caa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p058.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p059.png b/22471-page-images/p059.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6ab296f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p059.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p060.png b/22471-page-images/p060.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ab5ef6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p060.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p061.png b/22471-page-images/p061.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2b2e96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p061.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p062.png b/22471-page-images/p062.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7807772
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p062.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p063.png b/22471-page-images/p063.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8de9cf6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p063.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p064.png b/22471-page-images/p064.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec6f152
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p064.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p065.png b/22471-page-images/p065.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef71f1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p065.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p066.png b/22471-page-images/p066.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d98f3bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p066.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p067.png b/22471-page-images/p067.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1c5cd31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p067.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p068.png b/22471-page-images/p068.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a9d2124
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p068.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p069.png b/22471-page-images/p069.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44740b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p069.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p070.png b/22471-page-images/p070.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..63e74cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p070.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p071.png b/22471-page-images/p071.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ac1ed2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p071.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p072.png b/22471-page-images/p072.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..75ddd1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p072.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p073.png b/22471-page-images/p073.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..24fe374
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p073.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p074.png b/22471-page-images/p074.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c0a8bbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p074.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p075.png b/22471-page-images/p075.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d05c445
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p075.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p076.png b/22471-page-images/p076.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c3131a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p076.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p077.png b/22471-page-images/p077.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..48660da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p077.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p078.png b/22471-page-images/p078.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef0f167
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p078.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p079.png b/22471-page-images/p079.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2f63bb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p079.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p080.png b/22471-page-images/p080.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1479dee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p080.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p081.png b/22471-page-images/p081.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..97ae8d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p081.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p082.png b/22471-page-images/p082.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..870e448
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p082.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p083.png b/22471-page-images/p083.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8f729f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p083.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p084.png b/22471-page-images/p084.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..236beb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p084.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p085.png b/22471-page-images/p085.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b94f5bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p085.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p086.png b/22471-page-images/p086.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2460185
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p086.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p087.png b/22471-page-images/p087.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67c98d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p087.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p088.png b/22471-page-images/p088.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a01bdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p088.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p089.png b/22471-page-images/p089.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..653ed83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p089.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p090.png b/22471-page-images/p090.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e0b394b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p090.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p091.png b/22471-page-images/p091.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8436bfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p091.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p092.png b/22471-page-images/p092.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..333edfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p092.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p093.png b/22471-page-images/p093.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1db0e77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p093.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p094.png b/22471-page-images/p094.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd75371
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p094.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p095.png b/22471-page-images/p095.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4d5e2f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p095.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p096.png b/22471-page-images/p096.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eea26cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p096.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p097.png b/22471-page-images/p097.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a109f1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p097.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p098.png b/22471-page-images/p098.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1bfa0d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p098.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p099.png b/22471-page-images/p099.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13a6f00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p099.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p100.png b/22471-page-images/p100.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e23ce3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p100.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p101.png b/22471-page-images/p101.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2eab086
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p101.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p102.png b/22471-page-images/p102.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44475c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p102.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p103.png b/22471-page-images/p103.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..19323a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p103.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p104.png b/22471-page-images/p104.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..65fde21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p104.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p105.png b/22471-page-images/p105.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81b2ef0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p105.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p106.png b/22471-page-images/p106.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f252def
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p106.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p107.png b/22471-page-images/p107.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1c91d7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p107.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p108.png b/22471-page-images/p108.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..20f1e84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p108.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p109.png b/22471-page-images/p109.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9dfe251
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p109.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p110.png b/22471-page-images/p110.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e7ef0b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p110.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p111.png b/22471-page-images/p111.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c0459e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p111.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p112.png b/22471-page-images/p112.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6a70cf9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p112.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p113.png b/22471-page-images/p113.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..61ebb55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p113.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p114.png b/22471-page-images/p114.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c52a896
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p114.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p115.png b/22471-page-images/p115.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4aa782a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p115.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p116.png b/22471-page-images/p116.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e677aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p116.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p117.png b/22471-page-images/p117.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f527a5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p117.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p118.png b/22471-page-images/p118.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f459367
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p118.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p119.png b/22471-page-images/p119.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d5a56e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p119.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p120.png b/22471-page-images/p120.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..283b99a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p120.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p121.png b/22471-page-images/p121.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..43682b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p121.png
diff --git a/22471-page-images/p122.png b/22471-page-images/p122.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a649694
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471-page-images/p122.png
diff --git a/22471.txt b/22471.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18c0924
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6855 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch
+Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Fair Play Settlers of the West Branch Valley, 1769-1784
+       A Study of Frontier Ethnography
+
+Author: George D. Wolf
+
+Release Date: August 31, 2007 [EBook #22471]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+                    _The Fair Play Settlers
+                   of the West Branch Valley,
+                           1769-1784:
+                A Study of Frontier Ethnography_
+
+
+
+                               BY
+                         GEORGE D. WOLF
+
+
+
+                  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
+                  THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL
+                     AND MUSEUM COMMISSION
+
+                        Harrisburg, 1969
+
+
+
+
+                  THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL
+                     AND MUSEUM COMMISSION
+
+
+                 JAMES B. STEVENSON, _Chairman_
+
+                CHARLES G. WEBB, _Vice Chairman_
+
+ HERMAN BLUM                   MRS. FERNE SMITH HETRICK
+
+ MARK S. GLEESON               MRS. HENRY P. HOFFSTOT, JR.
+
+ RALPH HAZELTINE               MAURICE A. MOOK
+
+                      THOMAS ELLIOTT WYNNE
+
+                 DAVID H. KURTZMAN, _ex officio
+             Superintendent of Public Instruction_
+
+
+               MEMBERS FROM THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
+
+             MRS. SARAH ANDERSON, _Representative_
+
+ PAUL W. MAHADY, _Senator_     ORVILLE E. SNARE, _Representative_
+
+                  JOHN H. WARE, III, _Senator_
+
+
+                      TRUSTEES EX OFFICIO
+
+       RAYMOND P. SHAFER, _Governor of the Commonwealth_
+
+               ROBERT P. CASEY, _Auditor General_
+
+               GRACE M. SLOAN, _State Treasurer_
+
+
+                      ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
+
+          SYLVESTER K. STEVENS, _Executive Director_
+
+         WILLIAM J. WEWER, _Deputy Executive Director_
+
+                   DONALD H. KENT, _Director
+                Bureau of Archives and History_
+
+                  FRANK J. SCHMIDT, _Director
+            Bureau of Historic Sites and Properties_
+
+                 WILLIAM N. RICHARDS, _Director
+                       Bureau of Museums_
+
+
+
+
+_Preface_
+
+
+In an Age when man's horizons are constantly being widened to include
+hitherto little-known or non-existent countries, and even other planets
+and outer space, there is still much to be said for the oft-neglected
+study of man in his more immediate environs. Intrigued with the
+historical tale of the "Fair Play settlers" of the West Branch Valley of
+the Susquehanna River and practically a life-long resident of the West
+Branch Valley, this writer felt that their story was worth telling and
+that it might offer some insight into the development of democracy on
+the frontier. The result is an ethnography of the Fair Play settlers.
+This account, however, is not meant to typify the frontier experience;
+it is simply an illustration, and, the author hopes, a useful one.
+
+No intensive research can be conducted without the help and
+encouragement of many fine and wonderful people. This author is deeply
+indebted to librarians, archivists and historians, local historians and
+genealogists, local and county historical societies, and collectors of
+manuscripts, diaries, and journals pertinent to the history of the West
+Branch Valley. A comprehensive listing of all who have assisted in this
+effort would be too extensive, but certain persons cannot be ignored. My
+grateful appreciation is here expressed to a few of these; but my
+gratitude is no less sincere to the many persons who are not here
+mentioned.
+
+Librarians who have been most helpful in providing bibliographies,
+checking files, and obtaining volumes from other libraries include Miss
+Isabel Welch, of the Ross Library in Lock Haven; Mrs. Kathleen Chandler,
+formerly of the Lock Haven State College library; and Miss Barbara Ault,
+of the Library of Congress.
+
+Archivists and historians who have been most generous in their aid are
+the late Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, of the Pennsylvania Historical and
+Museum Commission; Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, of Collegeville; Dr. Alfred
+P. James, of the University of Pittsburgh; and Mrs. Solon J. Buck, of
+Washington, D. C.
+
+Perhaps the most significant research support for this investigation was
+provided by a local historian and genealogist, Mrs. Helen Herritt
+Russell, of Jersey Shore.
+
+Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, of the Pennsylvania State University, analyzed the
+Fair Play settlers using linguistic techniques to determine their
+national origins. This help was basic to the demographic portion of this
+study.
+
+Dr. Charles F. Berkheimer and Mrs. Marshall Anspach, both of
+Williamsport, magnanimously consented to loan this author their copies,
+respectively, of William Colbert's _Journal_ and the Wagner Collection
+of Revolutionary War Pension Claims.
+
+County and local historical societies which opened their collections for
+study were the Clinton County Historical Society, the Lycoming
+Historical Society, the Northumberland County Historical Society, the
+Centre County Historical Society, the Greene County Historical Society,
+and the Muncy Historical Society and Museum of History.
+
+For his refreshing criticisms and constant encouragement, Dr. Murray G.
+Murphey, of the University of Pennsylvania, will find me forever
+thankful. Without him, this study would not have been possible.
+
+The author would like to thank the members of the Pennsylvania
+Historical and Museum Commission and its Executive Director, Dr. S. K.
+Stevens, for making possible this publication; he would also like to
+thank Mr. Donald H. Kent, Director of the Bureau of Archives and
+History, and Mr. William A. Hunter, Chief of the Division of History,
+who supervised publication; and members of the staff of the Division of
+History: Mr. Harold L. Myers, Associate Historian and Chief of the
+Editorial Section, who readied the manuscript for publication; Mrs. Gail
+M. Gibson, Associate Historian, who prepared the index; and Mr. George
+R. Beyer, Assistant Historian.
+
+My sincerest thanks are also extended to Mrs. Mary B. Bower, who typed
+the entire manuscript and offered useful suggestions with regard to
+style.
+
+Finally, for providing almost ideal conditions for carrying on this work
+and for sustaining me throughout, my wife, Margaret, is deserving of a
+gratitude which cannot be fully expressed.
+
+                                        GEORGE D. WOLF
+
+
+
+
+_Introduction_
+
+
+Between 1769 and 1784, in an area some twenty-five miles long and about
+two miles wide, located on the north side of the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River and extending from Lycoming Creek (at the present
+Williamsport) to the Great Island (just east of the present Lock Haven),
+some 100 to 150 families settled. They established a community and a
+political organization called the Fair Play system. This study is about
+these people and their system.
+
+The author of a recent case study of democracy in a frontier county
+commented on the need for this kind of investigation.[1] Cognizant of
+the fact that a number of valuable histories of American communities
+have been written, he noted that few of them deal explicitly with the
+actual relation of frontier experience to democracy:
+
+    No one seems to have studied microscopically a given area that
+    experienced transition from wilderness to settled community with the
+    purpose of determining how much democracy, in Turner's sense,
+    existed initially in the first phase of settlement, during the
+    process itself, and in the period that immediately followed.
+
+This research encompasses the first two stages of that development and
+includes tangential references to the third stage.
+
+The geography of the Fair Play territory has been confused for almost
+two centuries. The conclusions of this analysis will not prove too
+satisfying to those who unquestioningly accept and revere the old local
+legends. However, it will be noted that these conclusions are based upon
+the accounts of journalists and diarists rather than hearsay. This
+should put the controversial "question of the Tiadaghton" to rest.
+
+A statistical analysis has been made as a significant part of the
+demography of the Fair Play settlers. However, limitations in data may
+raise some questions regarding the validity of the conclusions.
+Nevertheless, the national and ethnic origins of these settlers, their
+American sources of emigration, the periods of immigration, the reasons
+for migration, and population stability and mobility have all been
+investigated. The result offers some surprises when compared with the
+trends of the time--in the Province and throughout the colonies.
+
+The _politics_ of Fair Play is the principal concern of this entire
+study--appropriately, it was from their political system that these
+frontiersmen derived their unusual name. This was not the only group to
+use the name, however. Another "fair play system" existed in
+southwestern Pennsylvania during the same period, and perhaps a similar
+study can be made of those pioneers and their life. As for the Fair Play
+community of the West Branch, we know about its political structure
+through the cases subsequently reviewed by established courts of the
+Commonwealth. From these cases, we have reconstructed a "code" of
+operation which demonstrates certain democratic tendencies.
+
+In addition to studying the political system, an effort has been made to
+validate the story of the locally-famed Pine Creek Declaration of
+Independence. Although some evidence for such a declaration was found,
+it seems inconclusive.
+
+The West Branch Valley was part of what Turner called the second
+frontier, the Allegheny, and so this agrarian frontier community has
+been examined for evidence of the democratic traits which Turner
+characterized as particularly American. This analysis is not meant to
+portray a typical situation, but it does provide support for Turner's
+evaluation. As this was a farmer's frontier, and as transportation and
+communication facilities were extremely limited, a generally
+self-sufficient and naturally self-reliant community developed as a
+matter of survival. The characteristics which this frontier nurtured,
+and the non-English--even anti-English--composition of its population
+make understandable the sentiment in this region for independence from
+Great Britain. This, of course, is supremely demonstrated in the
+separate declaration of independence drawn, according to the report, by
+the settlers of the Fair Play frontier.
+
+Fair Play _society_ is, perhaps, the second-most-important facet of this
+ethnographic analysis. An understanding of it necessitated an inquiry
+into the social relationships, the religious institutions, the
+educational and cultural opportunities, and the values of this frontier
+community. The results, again, lend credence to Turner's hypothesis.
+Admittedly, Turner's bold assertion that "the growth of nationalism and
+the evolution of American political institutions were dependent on the
+advance of the frontier" is somewhat contradicted by the nature of this
+Pennsylvania frontier. Western lands in Pennsylvania were either
+Provincial, Commonwealth, or Indian lands, but never national lands. As
+a result, western land ordinances, and the whole controversy which
+accompanied the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, had no
+real significance in Pennsylvania. However, in subsequent years, the
+expansion of internal improvement legislation and nationalism sustains
+Turner's thesis, as does the democratic and non-sectional nature of the
+middle colonial region generally.[2]
+
+The _intellectual character_ which the frontier spawned has been
+described as rationalistic. However, this was a rationalism which was
+not at odds with empiricism, but which was more in line with what has
+been called the American philosophy, pragmatism. Or, to put it in the
+vernacular, "if it works, it's good." The frontiersman was a
+trial-and-error empiricist, who believed in his own ability to fathom
+the depths of the problems which plagued him. If the apparent solution
+contradicted past patterns and interpretations, he justified his actions
+in terms of the realities of the moment. It is this pragmatic
+ratio-empiricism which we imply when we use the term "rationalistic."
+
+An examination of the role of _leadership_, suggested by the Curti
+study, presents the first summary of this type for the West Branch
+Valley. Here, too, the limited numbers of this frontier population,
+combined with its peculiar tendency to rely upon peripheral residents
+for top leadership, prevents any broad generalizations. The nature of
+its leadership can only be interpreted in terms of this particular group
+in this specific location.
+
+The last two chapters of this study are summary chapters. The first of
+these is an analysis of democracy on one segment of the Pennsylvania
+frontier. Arbitrarily defining democracy, certain objective criteria
+were set up to evaluate it in the Fair Play territory. Political
+democracy was investigated in terms of popular sovereignty, political
+equality, popular consultation, and majority rule, and the political
+system was judged on the basis of these principles. Social democracy
+was ascertained through inquiries concerning religious freedom, the
+social class system, and economic opportunity. The conclusion is that,
+for this frontier at least, democratic tendencies were displayed in
+various contexts.
+
+The final chapter, although relying to a large extent upon Turner's
+great work, is in no way intended to be a critical evaluation of that
+thesis. Its primary objective is to test one interpretation of it
+through a particular analytic technique, ethnographic in nature.
+Frontier ethnography has proved to be a reliable research tool, mainly
+because of its wide scope. It permits conclusions which a strictly
+confined study, given the data limitations of this and other frontier
+areas, would not allow.
+
+Democracy, it is no doubt agreed, is a difficult thing to assess,
+particularly when there are so many conflicting interpretations of it.
+But an examination of it, even in its most primitive stages in this
+country, can give the researcher a glimpse of its fundamentals and its
+effectiveness. In a time when idealists envision a world community based
+upon the self-determination which was basic in this nation's early
+development, it is essential to re-evaluate that principle in terms of
+its earliest American development. If we would enjoy the blessings of
+freedom, we must undergo the fatigue of attempting to understand it.
+
+Some seventy years ago, a great American historian suggested an
+interpretation of the American ethos. Turner's thesis is still being
+debated today, something which I am certain would please its author
+immensely. But what is needed today is not the prolongation of the
+debate as to its validity so much as the investigation of it with newer
+techniques which, it might be added, Turner himself suggested. This is
+the merit of frontier ethnography, and, perhaps, the particular value of
+this study.
+
+To me, Robert Frost implied as much in his wonderful "Stopping by Woods
+on a Snowy Evening." Yes, the "woods" of contemporary history are
+"lovely, dark and deep,
+
+    But I have promises to keep,
+    And miles to go before I sleep,
+    And miles to go before I sleep."
+
+It is hoped that this investigation is the beginning of the answer to
+that promise, but it is well-recognized that there are miles to go.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Merle Curti _et al._, _The Making of an American Community: A Case
+Study of Democracy in a Frontier County_ (Stanford, 1959), p. 3.
+
+[2] _Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of Frederick Jackson Turner_,
+intro. by Ray Allen Billington (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1961), pp.
+52-55.
+
+
+
+
+_Table of Contents_
+
+
+       PREFACE                                         iii
+
+       INTRODUCTION                                      v
+
+    I. FAIR PLAY TERRITORY: GEOGRAPHY AND TOPOGRAPHY     1
+
+   II. THE FAIR PLAY SETTLERS: DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS      16
+
+  III. THE POLITICS OF FAIR PLAY                        30
+
+   IV. THE FARMERS' FRONTIER                            47
+
+    V. FAIR PLAY SOCIETY                                58
+
+   VI. LEADERSHIP AND THE PROBLEMS OF THE FRONTIER      76
+
+  VII. DEMOCRACY ON THE PENNSYLVANIA FRONTIER           89
+
+ VIII. FRONTIER ETHNOGRAPHY AND THE TURNER THESIS      100
+
+       BIBLIOGRAPHY                                    113
+
+       INDEX                                           119
+
+
+
+
+[Map]
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER ONE
+
+_Fair Play Territory: Geography and Topography_
+
+
+The Colonial period of American history has been of primary concern to
+the historian because of its fundamental importance in the development
+of American civilization. What the American pioneers encountered,
+particularly in the interior settlements, was, basically, a frontier
+experience. An ethnographic analysis of one part of the Provincial
+frontier of Pennsylvania indicates the significance of that colonial
+influence. The "primitive agricultural democracy" of this frontier
+illustrates the "style of life" which provided the basis for a
+distinctly "American" culture which emerged from the colonial
+experience.[1]
+
+While this writer's approach is dominantly Turnerian, this study does
+not necessarily contend that this Pennsylvania frontier was typical of
+the general colonial experience, nor that this ethnographic analysis
+presents in microcosm the development of the American ethos. However, on
+this farmer's frontier there was adequate evidence of the composite
+nationality, the self-reliance, the independence, and the nationalistic
+and rationalistic traits which Turner characterized as American.
+
+In his famed essay on "The Significance of the Frontier," Turner saw the
+frontier as the crucible in which the English, Scotch-Irish, and
+Palatine Germans were merged into a new and distinctly American
+nationality, no longer characteristically English.[2] The Pennsylvania
+frontier, with its dominant Scotch-Irish and German influence, is a case
+in point.
+
+The Fair Play territory of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna
+River, the setting for this analysis, was part of what Turner called the
+second frontier, the Allegheny Mountains.[3] Located about ninety miles
+up the Susquehanna from the present State capital at Harrisburg, and
+extending some twenty-five-odd miles westward between the present cities
+of Williamsport and Lock Haven, this territory was the heartland of the
+central Pennsylvania frontier in the decade preceding the American
+Revolution.
+
+The term "Fair Play settlers," used to designate the inhabitants of this
+region, is derived from the extra-legal political system which these
+democratic forerunners set up to maintain order in their developing
+community. Being squatters and, consequently, without the bounds of any
+established political agency, they formed their own government, and
+labeled it "Fair Play."
+
+However, despite the apparent simplicity of the above geographic
+description, the exact boundaries of the Fair Play territory have been
+debated for almost two centuries. Before we can assess the democratic
+traits of the Fair Play settlers, we must first clearly define what is
+meant by the Fair Play territory.
+
+The terminal points in this analysis are 1768 and 1784, the dates of the
+two Indian treaties made at Fort Stanwix (now Rome), New York. The
+former opened up the Fair Play territory to settlement, and the latter
+brought it within the limits of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, thus
+legalizing the _de facto_ political structure which had developed in the
+interim.
+
+According to the treaty of 1768, negotiated by Sir William Johnson with
+the Indians of the Six Nations, the western line of colonial settlement
+was extended from the Allegheny Mountains, previously set by the
+Proclamation of 1763, to a line extending to the mouth of Lycoming
+Creek, which empties into the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. The
+creek is referred to as the Tiadaghton in the original of the treaty.[4]
+The question of whether Pine Creek or Lycoming Creek was the Tiadaghton
+is the first major question of this investigation. The map which faces
+page one outlines the territory in question.
+
+Following the successful eviction of the French in the French and Indian
+War, the American counterpart of the Seven Years' War, the crown sought
+a more orderly westward advance than had been the rule. Heretofore, the
+establishment of frontier settlements had stirred up conflict with the
+Indians and brought frontier pleas to the colonial assemblies for
+military support and protection. The result was greater pressure on the
+already depleted exchequer. The opinion that a more controlled and less
+expensive westward advance could be accomplished is reflected in the
+Royal Proclamation of 1763.
+
+This proclamation has frequently been misinterpreted as a definite
+effort to deprive the colonies of their western lands. The very language
+of the document contradicts this. For example, the expression "for the
+present, and until our further pleasure be known" clearly indicates the
+tentative nature of the proclamation, which was "to prevent [the
+repetition of] such irregularities for the future" with the Indians,
+irregularities which had prompted Pontiac's Rebellion.[5] The orderly
+advancement of this colonial frontier was to be accomplished through
+subsequent treaties with the Indians. The Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768
+is one such example of those treaties.[6]
+
+The term "Fair Play settlers" refers to the residents of the area
+between Lycoming Creek and the Great Island on the north side of the
+West Branch of the Susquehanna River, and to those who interacted with
+them, during the period 1769-1784, when that area was outside of the
+Provincial limits. The appellation stems from the annual designation by
+the settlers of "Fair Play Men," a tribunal of three with
+quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial authority over the residents.
+
+The relevance of the first Stanwix Treaty to the geographic area of this
+study is a matter of the utmost importance. The western boundary of that
+treaty in the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna has been a source of
+some confusion because of the employment of the name "Tiadaghton" in the
+treaty to designate that boundary. The question, quite simply, is
+whether Pine Creek or Lycoming is the Tiadaghton. If Pine Creek is the
+Tiadaghton, an extra-legal political organization would have been
+unnecessary, for the so-called Fair Play settlers of this book would
+have been under Provincial jurisdiction.[7] The designation of Lycoming
+Creek as the Tiadaghton tends to give geographic corroboration for the
+Fair Play system.
+
+First and foremost among the Pine Creek supporters is John Meginness,
+the nineteenth-century historian of the West Branch Valley. His work is
+undoubtedly the most often quoted source of information on the West
+Branch Valley of the Susquehanna, and rightfully so. Although he wrote
+when standards of documentation were lax and relied to an extent upon
+local legendry as related by aged residents, Meginness' views have a
+general validity. However, there is some question regarding his judgment
+concerning the boundary issue.
+
+Quoting directly from the journal of Moravian Bishop Augustus
+Spangenburg, who visited the West Branch Valley in 1745 in the company
+of Conrad Weiser, David Zeisberger, and John Schebosh, Meginness
+describes the Bishop's travel from Montoursville, or Ostonwaken as the
+Indians called it, to the "Limping Messenger," or "Diadachton Creek,"
+where the party camped for the night.[8] It is interesting to note that
+the Moravian journalist refers here to Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton,
+some twenty-three years prior to the purchase at Fort Stanwix, which
+made the question a local issue. Yet Meginness, in a footnote written
+better than a hundred years later, says that "It afterwards turned out
+that the true _Diadachton_ or _Tiadachton_, was what is now known as
+Pine Creek."[9]
+
+Perhaps Meginness was influenced by the aged sources of some of his
+accounts. It may be, however, that he was merely repeating the judgment
+of an earlier generation which had sought to legalize its settlement
+made prior to the second Stanwix Treaty. The Indian description of the
+boundary line in the Fort Stanwix Treaty of 1768 may also have had some
+impact upon Meginness. Regardless, a comparison of data, pro and con,
+will demonstrate that the Tiadaghton is Lycoming Creek.
+
+John Blair Linn, of Bellefonte, stood second to Meginness in popular
+repute as historian of the West Branch Valley. However, he too calls
+Pine Creek the Tiadaghton, though the reliability of his sources is
+questionable. Unlike Meginness, whose judgment derived somewhat from
+interviews with contemporaries of the period, Linn based his contention
+upon the statements made by the Indians at the second Stanwix Treaty
+meeting in 1784.[10]
+
+At those sessions on October 22 and 23, 1784, the Pennsylvania
+commissioners twice questioned the deputies of the Six Nations about the
+location of the Tiadaghton, and were told twice that it was Pine
+Creek.[11] In the first instance, Samuel J. Atlee, speaking for the
+other Pennsylvania commissioners, called attention to the last deed made
+at Fort Stanwix in 1768 and asked the question about the Tiadaghton:
+
+    This last deed, brothers, with the map annexed, are descriptive of
+    the purchase made sixteen years ago at this place; one of the
+    boundary lines calls for a creek by the name of _Tyadoghton_, we
+    wish our brothers the Six Nations to explain to us clearly which you
+    call the _Tyadoghton_, as there are two creeks issuing from the
+    _Burnet's Hills_, _Pine_ and _Lycoming_.[12]
+
+Captain Aaron Hill, a Mohawk chief, responded for the Indians:
+
+    With regard to the creek called _Tyadoghton_, mentioned in your deed
+    of 1768, we have already answered you, and again repeat it, it is
+    the same you call _Pine Creek_, being the largest emptying into the
+    west branch of the _Susquehannah_.[13]
+
+This, of course, was the "more positive answer" which the Indians had
+promised after the previous day's interrogation.[14] It substantiated
+the description given in the discussions preceding the Fort Stanwix
+Treaty of 1768.[15] However, the map illustrating the treaty line,
+although tending to support this view, is subject to interpretation.[16]
+Regardless, this record of the treaty sessions provides the strongest
+evidence to sustain the Pine Creek view.
+
+There is little doubt that Meginness and Linn were influenced by the
+record. This is certainly true of D. S. Maynard, a lesser
+nineteenth-century historian, whose work is obviously based upon the
+research of Meginness. Maynard repeated the evidence of his predecessor
+from the account of Thomas Sergeant by describing the Stanwix Treaty
+line of 1768 as coming "across to the headwaters of Pine Creek."
+Maynard's utter dependence upon Meginness suggests that his evidence is
+more repetitive than substantive.[17]
+
+A more recent student of local history, Eugene P. Bertin, of Muncy,
+gives Pine Creek his undocumented support, which appears to be nothing
+more than an elaboration of the accounts of Meginness and Linn.[18] Dr.
+Bertin's account appears to be better folklore than history.[19]
+
+Another twentieth-century writer, Elsie Singmaster, offers more
+objective support for Pine Creek, although her argument appears to be
+better semantics than geography.[20]
+
+Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, in his biography of David Zeisberger, errs in
+his interpretation of the term "Limping Messenger" (Tiadaghton), used by
+Bishop Spangenburg in his account of their journey to the West Branch
+Valley in 1745. He notes that on their way to Onondaga (Syracuse) after
+leaving "Ostonwaken" (Montoursville) they passed through the valley of
+Tiadaghton Creek. They were following the Sheshequin Path. But he
+identifies the Tiadaghton with Pine Creek. There was an Indian path up
+Pine Creek, but it led to Niagara, not Onondaga.[21]
+
+Aside from the designation by the Indians at the second Stanwix Treaty,
+there is only one other source which lends any credibility to the Pine
+Creek view, and that is Smith's _Laws of the Commonwealth of
+Pennsylvania_. After the last treaty was made acquiring Pennsylvania
+lands from the Indians, the legislature, in order to quell disputes
+about the right of occupancy in this "New Purchase,"[22] passed the
+following legislation:
+
+    And whereas divers persons, who have heretofore occupied and
+    cultivated small tracts of land, without the bounds of the purchase
+    made, as aforesaid, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven
+    hundred and sixty-eight, and within the purchase made, or now to be
+    made, by the said commissioners, have, by their resolute stand and
+    sufferings during the late war, merited, that those settlers should
+    have the pre-emption of their respective plantations:
+
+    _Be it therefore enacted by the authority aforesaid_, That all and
+    every person or persons, and their legal representatives, who has or
+    have heretofore settled on the north side of the west branch of the
+    river Susquehanna, upon the Indian territory, between Lycomick or
+    Lycoming creek on the east, and Tyagaghton or Pine creek on the
+    west, as well as other lands within the said residuary purchase from
+    the Indians, of the territory within this state, excepting always
+    the lands herein before excepted, shall be allowed a right of
+    pre-emption to their respective possessions, at the price
+    aforesaid.[23]
+
+It may be worth observing, however, that legislation tends to reflect
+popular demand rather than the hard facts of a situation. In this case
+the settlers of the region prior to 1780 stood to benefit by this
+legislation and formed an effective pressure group.
+
+The contrary view in this long-standing geographical debate is based,
+for the most part, upon the records of journalists and diarists who
+traveled along the West Branch _prior_ to the first Stanwix Treaty and
+who thus had no axe to grind.
+
+That the Lycoming Creek was in fact the Tiadaghton referred to by the
+Indians at Fort Stanwix in 1768 is strongly indicated by the weight of
+evidence derived from the journals of Conrad Weiser (1737), John Bartram
+(1743), Bishop Spangenburg (1745), Moravian Bishop John Ettwein (1772),
+and the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian (1775). In addition, the maps of
+Lewis Evans (1749) and John Adlum (1792), the land applications of
+Robert Galbreath and Martin Stover (1769), and a 1784 statute of the
+Pennsylvania General Assembly all tend to validate Lycoming's claim to
+recognition as the Tiadaghton. Each datum has merit in the final
+analysis, which justifies the specific examination which follows:
+
+Supporting evidence is found in Weiser's German journal, which was meant
+for his family and friends, and translated into English by his
+great-grandson, Hiester H. Muhlenberg. (Weiser also kept an English
+journal for the Council at Philadelphia.) Weiser wrote: "The stream we
+are now on the Indians call Dia-daclitu, (die berirte, the lost or
+bewildered) which in fact deserves such a name."[24] (This is an obvious
+misspelling of Diadachton.) Weiser was following the Sheshequin Path
+with Shickellamy to Onondaga and this entry is recorded on March 25,
+1737, long before there was any question about the Tiadaghton.
+
+There seems to be some confusion over Bishop Spangenburg's use of the
+term "Limping Messenger" in his journal for June 8, 1745. He too was
+traveling the Sheshequin Path with David Zeisberger, Conrad Weiser,
+Shickellamy, Andrew Montour, _et al._ He describes the "Limping
+Messenger" as a camp on the "Tiadachton" (Lycoming), whereas
+DeSchweinitz in his _Zeisberger_ interprets the term to mean Pine
+Creek.[25]
+
+Another traveler along the Sheshequin Path was the colonial botanist,
+John Bartram. Bartram, in the company of Weiser and Lewis Evans, the map
+maker, notes in his diary of July 12, 1743, riding "down [up] a valley
+to a point, a prospect of an opening bearing N, then down the hill to a
+run and over a rich neck lying between it and the Tiadaughton."[26]
+Incidentally, the editor of this extract from Bartram's journal makes
+the quite devastating point that Meginness did not know of Bartram's
+journal, which was published in London in 1751 but which did not appear
+in America until 1895.[27]
+
+One of the Moravian journalists who visited the scenic Susquehanna along
+the West Branch was Bishop John Ettwein, who passed through this valley
+on his way to Ohio in 1772. He wrote of "Lycoming Creek, [as the stream]
+which marks the boundary line of lands purchased from the Indians."[28]
+
+Perhaps the most interesting and informative diarist who journeyed along
+the West Branch was the Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian. Fithian came to
+what we will establish as Fair Play country on July 25, 1775, at what he
+called "Lacommon Creek." His conclusion was that this creek was the
+Tiadaghton.[29] It is this same Fithian, it might be added, whose
+Virginia journals were the primary basis for the reconstruction of
+colonial Williamsburg.
+
+The work of colonial cartographers also substantiates the claim that
+Lycoming Creek is the Tiadaghton. Both Lewis Evans, following his 1743
+journey in the company of Bartram and Weiser, and John Adlum, who
+conducted a survey of the West Branch Valley in 1792 for the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, failed to label Pine Creek as the
+"Tiadaghton" on their maps.[30] In fact, Adlum's map of 1792, found
+among the papers of William Bingham, designates the area east of
+Lycoming Creek as the "Old Purchase." Furthermore, as is the case with
+Evans' map, Adlum does not apply the Tiadaghton label to either Pine
+Creek or Lycoming Creek.[31]
+
+Two applications in 1769 for land in the New Purchase show that the
+Tiadaghton, or in this case "Ticadaughton," can only be Lycoming Creek.
+The application of Robert Galbreath (no. 1823) is described as "Bounded
+on one side by the Proprietor's tract at Lycoming." Martin Stover
+applied for the same tract (application no. 2611), which is described as
+"below the mouth of Ticadaughton Creek."[32] The copies of these two
+applications, together with the copy of the survey, offer irrefutable
+proof of the validity of Lycoming's claim.
+
+Perhaps the final note is the action of the General Assembly of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on December 12, 1784.[33] The legislators
+affirmed the judgments of the frontier journalists, whose recorded
+journeys offer the best proof that the Lycoming is the Tiadaghton. Prior
+to this action, the Provincial authorities had issued a proclamation on
+September 20, 1773, prohibiting settlement west of Lycoming Creek by
+white persons. Violators were to be apprehended and tried. The penalties
+were real and quite severe: L500 fine, twelve months in prison without
+bail, and a guarantee of twelve months of exemplary conduct after
+release.[34] Court records, however, fail to indicate any prosecutions.
+
+Finally, the latest scholar to delve into the complexities of the
+Stanwix treaties, Professor Peter Marshall, says that there was no
+prolonged and close discussion about the running of the treaty line in
+Pennsylvania (the Tiadaghton question), no discussion in any way
+comparable to that which took place over its location in New York.[35]
+
+In summary then, it appears that the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768 was
+responsible for opening the West Branch Valley to settlement, such
+settlement being stimulated by the opening of the Land Office in
+Philadelphia on April 3, 1769. James Tilghman, secretary of the Land
+Office, published the notice of his office's willingness "to receive
+applications from all persons inclinable to take up lands in the New
+Purchase."[36] The enthusiasm generated by the opening of the Land
+Office is shown by the better than 2,700 applications received on the
+very first day. However, the question of the Tiadaghton came to be a
+source of real contention. The ambiguity of the Indian references to the
+western boundary of the first Stanwix Treaty led the eager settlers, who
+were seeking to legitimize claims in the area between Lycoming and Pine
+creeks, to favor Pine Creek. There was substance to the settlers' claim.
+
+The significance of the boundary question to this study is better
+understood when it is recognized that the so-called Fair Play system of
+government in lands beyond the Provincial limits must have a definable
+locale. It is this writer's firm conviction that Fair Play territory
+extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna, to the Great Island, some five miles west of Pine
+Creek. The foundation for the establishment of Lycoming Creek as the
+Tiadaghton, and consequently, as the eastern boundary of the Fair Play
+territory is apparent once all the evidence is examined. Aside from the
+comments of the Indians at the treaty negotiations and Smith's _Laws of
+the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_, there are only secondary accounts
+with little documentation to sustain the Pine Creek argument.
+
+On the other hand, the Lycoming Creek claim is buttressed by such
+primary sources as the journals of Weiser, Bartram, Spangenberg,
+Ettwein, and Fithian, three of which were written before the location of
+the Tiadaghton became a subject of dispute. Since none of these men was
+seeking lands, they can be considered impartial observers. Furthermore,
+the cartographic efforts of Lewis Evans and John Adlum followed actual
+visits to the region and say nothing to favor the Pine Creek view.
+
+Perhaps the Indians were merely accepting an already accomplished fact
+at the meeting in 1784. Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace says that this would have
+been expected from the subservient, pacified Indian. Regardless, the
+Provincial leadership made no effort to settle the lands in what some
+called "the disputed territory" until after the later agreement at
+Stanwix; in fact, they discouraged it.[37] The simple desire for
+legitimacy gives us very little to go on in the light of more than
+adequate documentation of the justice of the Lycoming view.
+
+This evidence might suggest changing the name of the long-revered
+"Tiadaghton Elm" to the "Pine Creek Elm" and bringing to a close the
+vexatious question of the Tiadaghton. However let us strike a note of
+caution, if not humility. Indian place names had a way of shifting,
+doubling, and moving, since they served largely as descriptive terms and
+not as true place names. It is not at all unusual to find the same name
+applied to several places or to find names migrating. The Tiadaghton
+could have been Lycoming Creek to some Indians at one time, and Pine
+Creek to others at the same or another time. Consider, for example, that
+there were three Miami rivers in present Ohio, which are now known as
+the Miami, the Little Miami, and the Maumee. It hardly makes any real
+difference to the geography of the Fair Play territory, or to the
+delimiting of its boundaries, which stream was the Tiadaghton. Actually,
+it was the doubt about it which drew in the squatters and created Fair
+Play. These settlers justified their contention that the Tiadaghton was
+Pine Creek by moving into the territory and holding onto it. This may be
+reason enough for calling the famous tree the Tiadaghton Elm, even if
+early travelers and the proprietary officials said that the Tiadaghton
+was Lycoming Creek.[38]
+
+The topography of the region also influenced the delineation of what we
+call Fair Play territory. The jugular vein which supplies the life-blood
+to this region is undoubtedly the West Branch of the Susquehanna River.
+This branch of the great river, which drains almost fifty per cent of
+the State, follows a northeasterly course of some forty miles from the
+Great Island, which is just east of present Lock Haven, to what is now
+Muncy, then turns southward.[39]
+
+The West Branch of the mighty Susquehanna, which has plagued generations
+of residents with its spring floodings, was the primary means of ingress
+and egress for the area. Rich bottom lands at the mouths of Lycoming,
+Larrys, and Pine creeks drew the hardy pioneer farmers, and here they
+worked the soil to provide the immediate needs for survival. Hemmed in
+on the north by the plateau area of the Appalachian front and on the
+south by the Bald Eagle Mountains, these courageous pioneers of frontier
+democracy carved their future out of the two-mile area (more often less)
+between those two forbidding natural walls. With the best lands to be
+found around the mouth of Pine Creek, which is reasonably close to the
+center of this twenty-five-mile area, it seems quite natural that the
+major political, social, and economic developments would take place in
+close proximity--and they did.[40]
+
+Thus, an area never exceeding two miles in width and spanning some ten
+miles (presently from Jersey Shore to Lock Haven) was the heartland of
+Fair Play settlement. Lycoming Creek, Larrys Creek, and Pine Creek all
+run south into the West Branch, having channeled breaks through the
+rolling valley which extends along the previously defined territory.
+
+"The land was ours before we were the land's," the poet said, and it
+seems apropos of this moment in history.[41] Fair Play territory,
+possessed before it was owned and operated under _de facto_ rule, would
+be some time in Americanizing the sturdy frontiersmen who came to bring
+civilization to this wilderness.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Carl L. Becker, _Beginnings of the American People_ (Ithaca, N. Y.,
+1960), p. 182.
+
+[2] Turner, _Frontier and Section_, p. 51.
+
+[3] Frederick Jackson Turner, _The Frontier in American History_ (New
+York, 1963), p. 9.
+
+[4] E. B. O'Callaghan, _Documentary History of the State of New York_
+(Albany, 1849), I, 587-591.
+
+[5] Henry Steele Commager, _Documents of American History_ (New York,
+1958), I, 49.
+
+[6] An earlier twentieth-century historian misinterprets the first
+Stanwix Treaty in much the same manner as earlier colonial historians
+erred in their judgments of the Proclamation of 1763. Albert T.
+Volwiler, _George Croghan and the Westward Movement, 1741-1782_
+(Cleveland, 1926), p. 250, really overstates his case, if the Fair Play
+settlers are any example, when he claims that the Fort Stanwix line, by
+setting a definite boundary, impeded the western advance. Establishing
+friendships with the Indians and then persuading them to sell their
+lands proved valuable to more than speculators, whose case Volwiler
+documents so well, as West Branch settlements after 1768 will attest.
+
+[7] The extension of Provincial authority to Pine Creek would have taken
+in three-fourths of what we have labeled Fair Play territory.
+
+[8] John F. Meginness, _Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley
+of the Susquehanna_ (Williamsport, 1889), p. 106. The full passage from
+the Bethlehem Diary (now in the Moravian Archives) was translated by the
+late Dr. William N. Schwarze for Dr. Paul A. W. Wallace, historian of
+the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, as follows: "In the
+afternoon [June 8, New Style] our brethren left that place [beyond
+Montoursville] and came in the evening to the Limping Messenger on the
+Tiadachton Creek, where they spent the night." In the _Pennsylvania
+Magazine of History and Biography_, II (1878), 432 (hereafter cited as
+_PMHB_), Zeisberger's account is translated in this manner: "In the
+afternoon we proceeded on our journey, and at dusk came to the 'Limping
+Messenger,' or Diadachton Creek [a note identifies this as Lycoming],
+and encamped for the night." Here the error is in identifying the
+Limping Messenger with the stream. Meginness, of course, repeated the
+error in his _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 106. Referring the passage to
+Vernon H. Nelson of the Moravian Archives, through Dr. Wallace, resulted
+in a clarification of the translation and the affirmation of the
+"Limping Messenger" as a camp on the stream. In the Bethlehem Diary,
+under June 8, 1754, the sentence appears as follows: "des Nachm.
+reissten unsre Brr Wieder von da weg u kamen Abends zum hinckenden Boten
+an der Tiatachton Creek, u lagen da uber Nacht." In the original travel
+journal the passage reads: "des Nachm. reissten wir wieder von da weg, u
+kamen Abends zum _hinckenden Boten_ an der Tiatachton Crick u lagen da
+uber Nacht." De Schweinitz in his _Zeisberger_ further confused the
+issue in his description of the journey. He takes the adventurers
+(Zeisberger, Spangenburg, Conrad Weiser, Shickellamy, and Andrew
+Montour) through the valley of the Tiadaghton Creek on the Sheshequin
+Path to Onondaga (Syracuse). There was an Indian path up Pine Creek, but
+it led to Niagara, not Onondaga.
+
+[9] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 106. This is an added note of
+Meginness' commentary upon the citation noted above.
+
+[10] John Blair Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties,
+Pennsylvania_ (Philadelphia, 1883), p. 468. Linn also deals with the
+Tiadaghton question in his "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers,"
+_PMHB_, VII (1883), 420-425. Here he simply defines Fair Play territory
+as "Indian Land" encompassing the Lycoming-Pine Creek region.
+
+[11] _Minutes of the First Session of the Ninth General Assembly of the
+Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ..._ (Philadelphia, 1784), Appendix,
+Proceedings of the Treaties held at Forts Stanwix and McIntosh, pp.
+314-322.
+
+[12] _Ibid._, Oct. 23, p. 319.
+
+[13] _Ibid._
+
+[14] _Ibid._, Oct. 22, p. 316.
+
+[15] E. B. O'Callaghan, _Documents Relative to the Colonial History of
+the State of New York_, VIII (Albany, 1857), 125. In the discussions
+preceding the Fort Stanwix Treaty of 1768, the Indians' description of
+the boundary line could be interpreted as favoring Pine Creek: "... to
+the Head of the West Branch of Susquehanna thence down the same to Bald
+Eagle Creek thence across the River at Tiadaghta Creek below the great
+Island, thence by a straight Line to Burnett's Hills and along the
+same...." The juxtaposition of Bald Eagle Creek, the Great Island, and
+"Tiadaghta" Creek makes this conclusion plausible.
+
+[16] _See also ibid._, Guy Johnson's map illustrating the treaty line,
+opposite p. 136.
+
+[17] D. S. Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County, From Its
+Earliest Settlement To The Present Time_ (Lock Haven, 1875), p. 8. The
+line is given by Maynard as follows: "... and took in the lands lying
+east of the North Branch of the Susquehanna, beginning at Owego, down to
+Towanda, thence up the same and across to the headwaters of Pine Creek;
+thence down the same to Kittanning...."
+
+[18] Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, VIII (1947), 258-259.
+
+[19] Dr. Bertin, former associate secretary of the Pennsylvania State
+Education Association, adds nothing to the Meginness and Linn accounts,
+his probable sources. He speaks of settlements as early as 1772, whereas
+it is a matter of record that Cleary Campbell squatted in what is now
+north Lock Haven sometime shortly after 1769. He refers to the
+establishment of homes, properly, but then goes on to add churches and
+schools. The source for his "Children and elders met together
+periodically to recite catechism to the preacher, who was a travelling
+missionary, one being Phillip Fithian," was J. B. Linn. But Fithian, an
+extremely accurate diarist, fails to mention the occasion during his
+one-week visit to this area in the summer of 1775. However, the real
+value of this article is the editorial note by T. Kenneth Wood on the
+Tiadaghton question. In it he refers to John Bartram's journal of 1743,
+twenty-five years before the Stanwix Treaty at Rome, N. Y., with the
+Iroquois, which recounts his travels with the Oneida Chief Shickellamy
+and Conrad Weiser. Lewis Evans was also in the party, making notes for
+his map of 1749. The party, on its way to Onondaga (Syracuse), was
+approaching Lycoming Creek at a point just south of Powys, via the
+Sheshequin Indian path. Bartram, the first American botanist, who wrote
+in his journal nightly after checking with his two guides, gives this
+account, T. Kenneth Wood (ed.), "Observations Made By John Bartram In
+His Travels from Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the Lake Ontario
+in 1743," _Now and Then_, V (1936), 90: "Then down a hill to a run and
+over a rich neck of land lying between it and the Tiadaughton." No
+contact was made with Pine Creek. Dr. Wood contends in his note to the
+Bertin article, and this writer is inclined to agree, that the Indian of
+1743 and the Indian of 1768 were telling the truth and that the white
+settlers of 1768, and for sixteen years thereafter, were wrong, either
+through guile and design or ignorance. He says, "The original Indian
+principals signing the treaty had retreated westward and sixteen years
+of fighting over the question (and possibly a few bribes) had settled it
+to the white man's satisfaction. The Indians always had to yield or get
+out." This is essentially the point which Dr. Wallace made to me in his
+letter of Feb. 16, 1961.
+
+[20] Elsie Singmaster, _Pennsylvania's Susquehanna_ (Harrisburg, 1950),
+p. 87. Her Pine Creek description (while describing tributaries of the
+Susquehanna) speaks of the gorge as the upper course of Pine Creek,
+which is now part of Harrison State Park. Here, she says, "The rim is
+accessible by a paved highway, and from there one may look down a
+thousand feet and understand why the Indians called the stream
+Tiadaghton or Lost Creek."
+
+[21] Edmund A. DeSchweinitz, _The Life and Times of David Zeisberger_
+(Philadelphia, 1871), p. 133. Further evidence of DeSchweinitz'
+confusion is found in his Geographical Glossary in the same book. On
+page 707, he calls the Great Island, Lock Haven; on page 709, he calls
+Long Island, Jersey Shore; and on page 713, he refers to Pine Creek as
+the Tiadaghton, "also called Diadaghton."
+
+[22] The term "New Purchase" was frequently used, both officially and
+otherwise, to designate the area on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island, although in
+actuality the purchase line terminated at Lycoming Creek.
+
+[23] Charles Smith, _Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_
+(Philadelphia, 1810), II, 274.
+
+[24] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Conrad Weiser, Friend of Colonist and Mohawk_
+(Philadelphia, 1945), p. 81.
+
+[25] Wallace mistakenly attaches the appellation "Limping Messenger" to
+"a foot-sore Indian named Anontagketa," _ibid._, p. 220. However, this
+error was corrected in a letter to this writer, August 24, 1962.
+
+[26] Wood (ed.), "Observations Made By John Bartram," p. 90.
+
+[27] _Ibid._, p. 79.
+
+[28] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 411.
+
+[29] Robert Greenhalgh Albion and Leonidas Dodson (eds.), _Philip
+Vickers Fithian: Journal, 1775-1776_ (Princeton, 1934), pp. 69-76.
+
+[30] Hazel Shields Garrison, "Cartography of Pennsylvania before 1800,"
+_PMHB_, LIX (1935), 255-283. Information on Adlum's maps was obtained
+from [T. Kenneth Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor,
+1792, Found Among the Bingham Papers," _Now and Then_, X (July, 1952),
+148-150.
+
+[31] [Wood], "Map Drawn by John Adlum," pp. 148-150.
+
+[32] Bureau of Land Records, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, New Purchase
+Applications, Nos. 1823 and 2611, April 3, 1769.
+
+[33] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XI, 508.
+
+[34] _Colonial Records_, X, 95.
+
+[35] In a letter to this writer, May 19, 1962, Professor Marshall
+states: "It was my opinion that the treaty marked, in one aspect, a
+bargain between Johnson and the Six Nations. I do not accept
+Billington's charge of betrayal of their interests. But it does seem to
+me that this meant hard bargaining in New York, when the state of Indian
+and colonial lands was precisely known to both sides, and indifference
+and ignorance beyond this point.... As far as I am aware, there was no
+prolonged and close discussion about the running of the line in
+Pennsylvania in the least comparable to that which took place over its
+location in New York." _See_ Peter Marshall, "Sir William Johnson and
+the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, 1768," _The Journal of American Studies_, I
+(Oct., 1967), pp. 149-179.
+
+[36] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 340.
+
+[37] Helen Herritt Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of
+Independence," _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XXII (1958), 1-15.
+
+[38] The fame of this historic elm stems from the fact that it is
+reputed to be the site of a local declaration of independence made the
+same day as the adoption of Jefferson's draft in Philadelphia, July 4,
+1776. The author is indebted to Donald H. Kent, Director of the Bureau
+of Archives and History, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,
+for the idea and some of the expression in this paragraph.
+
+[39] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation_ (New York,
+1962) p. 3. This delightful book in the "Regions of America" series,
+edited by Carl Carmer, contains an excellent chapter on the significance
+of Pennsylvania's "Three Rivers."
+
+[40] Gristmills--meeting places of the Fair Play tribunal--a school, and
+a church would all be found in this Pine Creek region. However, the
+church (Presbyterian) would not be built until the territory became an
+official part of the Commonwealth following the second Stanwix Treaty in
+1784.
+
+[41] Robert Frost, _Complete Poems of Robert Frost_ (New York, 1949), p.
+467. This poem somehow characterizes the experiences of the settlers of
+this frontier and many frontiers to come.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER TWO
+
+_The Fair Play Settlers: Demographic Factors_
+
+
+James Logan, president of the Proprietary Council of Pennsylvania,
+1736-1738, once declared that "if the Scotch-Irish continue to come they
+will make themselves masters of the Province."[1] His prediction, which
+was to be generally proven in the Province during the French and Indian
+War, was to be demonstrated particularly in the West Branch Valley
+during the Revolutionary period. The Scotch-Irish were the dominant
+national or ethnic group in the Fair Play territory from 1769 to 1784.
+This dominance is demonstrated in Chart 1, which indicates the national
+origins of eighty families in the Fair Play territory.
+
+
+ CHART 1
+
+ National Origins of Fair Play Settlers[2]
+ Expressed in Numbers and Percentages
+
+  Total  Scotch-Irish   English  German  Scots  Irish  Welsh  French
+ ====================================================================
+   80         39          16       12     5       4     2       2
+    %         48.75       20       15     6.25    5     2.5     2.5
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Not only were the Scotch-Irish the most numerous national stock among
+the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley, but they also
+represented a plurality and almost a majority of the entire population.
+The significance of this finding in terms of the "style of life" of the
+Fair Play settlers cannot be over-emphasized. It influenced the
+politics, the religion, the family patterns, and thus the values of this
+frontier society.
+
+Several other important conclusions can be drawn from this chart. In
+contrast to the population of Pennsylvania in general and the
+assumptions regarding frontier areas in particular, the English, rather
+than the Germans, were the second most numerous national stock group.
+The Germans, however, made up the third-largest segment of the West
+Branch Valley population. The Scots, Welsh, Irish, and a few French
+inhabitants formed the remaining sixteen per cent of the population.
+Obviously, this was a dominantly Anglo-Saxon Protestant area of
+settlement.
+
+The impact of this Scotch-Irish hegemony upon the religion, politics,
+family life, and social values in general will be dealt with in a later
+chapter. However, it can be noted at this juncture that the
+strong-willed individualism which characterized these sturdy people was
+as much influenced by their national origin as by their experience on
+the American frontier. Furthermore, Presbyterianism influenced and was
+influenced by a developing democratic political system, which paralleled
+the American Presbyterian system of popular rather than hierarchical
+church government.[3] A prominent immigration historian has pointed out
+that "the theory of Presbyterian republicanism, as a matter of church
+policy, could easily be reconciled with demands of the more radical
+democrats of 1776."[4] Finally, the social life and customs and, hence,
+the values of this frontier society were governed for the most part by
+this majority group. Thus, dogmatic faith, political equality, social
+and economic independence, respect for education, and a tightly-knit
+pattern of family relationships express appropriately the institutional
+patterns by which the Scotch-Irish of the West Branch operated.
+
+It is interesting to contrast the national stock groupings of this
+Susquehanna frontier with the results of a study of national origins of
+the American population made by the American Council of Learned
+Societies and published in 1932:[5]
+
+
+ CHART 2
+
+ Classification of the White Population into Its National
+ Stocks in the Continental United States and Pennsylvania:
+ 1790; and in the Fair Play Territory: 1784 (Expressed in Percentages).
+
+         Scotch-Irish  English  German  Scots  Irish  Welsh  French  Other
+ =========================================================================
+ Conti-
+ nental
+ United
+ States         5.9     60.1      8.6     8.1   3.6      0     2.3    10.6
+
+ Penn-
+ sylva-
+ nia           11.0     35.3     33.3     8.6   3.5      0     1.8     6.5
+
+ Fair
+ Play
+ Terri-
+ tory         48.75       20       15    6.25     5    2.5     2.5       0
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+From this comparison it can readily be seen that the national origins of
+the Fair Play settlers in no way conform to either the national pattern
+or the State pattern of just a few years later. Although this limited
+frontier area can be recognized as having its own individual ratio of
+component stocks, it is representative rather than unique in its culture
+and values. The reaction of those of other national stocks to the
+frontier experience buttresses the conclusion that their values were
+influenced more by the frontier than by national origin. It is this
+common reaction to the problems of the frontier which gives rise to the
+conclusion that this West Branch Valley environment was characterized by
+and that its inhabitants held values which Turner evaluated as
+democratic. The nature of those democratic values is, however, dealt
+with in greater detail in subsequent chapters.
+
+The American sources of emigration form the next question to be
+considered in examining the origins of the Fair Play settlers. Lacking
+adequate statistical data for a complete picture of migration in terms
+of percentages, the following chart indicates only the probable origins
+of the three most numerous national stock groupings in the Fair Play
+territory:
+
+
+ CHART 3
+
+ American Sources of Emigration[6]
+
+  National     Percentage of
+   Stock        Population      American Source of Emigration
+ ===============================================================
+ Scotch-Irish     48.75       Chester, Cumberland, Dauphin,
+                              Lancaster counties
+
+ English          20          New Jersey, New York, southeastern
+                              Pennsylvania (Philadelphia and
+                              Bucks counties)
+
+ German           15          Chester, Lancaster, Philadelphia,
+                              and York counties
+
+ Total            83.75
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Obviously, the primary sources for the West Branch settlements were the
+lower Susquehanna Valley and southeastern Pennsylvania. However, an
+appreciable number of English settlers appear to have come originally
+from New Jersey to settle in what they called "Jersey Shore,"
+immediately east of the mouth of Pine Creek. One explanation for the
+migration of the dominant stock, the Scotch-Irish, is probably the fact
+that the Provincial government refused to sell more lands in Lancaster
+and York counties to the Scotch-Irish. In effect, they were driven to
+use squatter tactics in the Fair Play territory.[7]
+
+The internal origins of sixteen of these settlers can be verified in
+either Meginness or Linn. Four came from Chester County, three each from
+the Juniata Valley and Lancaster County, two each from Cumberland County
+and New Jersey, and one each from Dauphin County and from Orange County
+in New York. Nine of these settlers, incidentally, were Scotch-Irish.
+Although these data are insufficient for any valid generalization, they
+do conform to the characteristic migratory trends indicated in Chart 3.
+
+In analyzing the migration of settlers into the West Branch Valley
+beyond the line of the "New Purchase," it becomes apparent that the
+Scotch-Irish came from the fringe areas of settlement, whereas the
+English and Germans tended to migrate from more settled areas.
+Furthermore, the English migrants often came from outside the Province
+of Pennsylvania, either from New Jersey or New York. In fact, if one
+were to construct a pattern of concentric zones, with the core in the
+southeastern corner of the Province and the lines radiating in a
+north-westerly direction, the English would be found at the core, the
+Germans in the next zone, and the Scotch-Irish in the outlying area.
+This zoning offers no real contradiction of the usual pattern of
+Pennsylvania migrations. However, when one combines the data of internal
+movements with those of external origins, certain contradictions do
+appear. The most noteworthy of these is, of course, the prominence of
+English settlers on this Fair Play frontier vis-a-vis the Germans.
+
+Since the Pennsylvania frontiersmen of the Wyoming Valley were of
+English stock, and immigrated from New England, it might have been
+assumed that some of these Connecticut settlers came into the West
+Branch Valley. Here, however, all evidence points to the fact that
+Connecticut settlers did not migrate west of Muncy, which is located at
+the juncture of Muncy Creek and the West Branch of the Susquehanna River
+(where the bend in the river turns into a directly western pattern).
+Thus the Connecticut boundary dispute of 1769-1775, which erupted into
+the Pennamite Wars, did not involve the Fair Play settlers.[8]
+Nevertheless, at least one Fair Play settler looked forward to the
+possibility of an advance of the Connecticut settlement along the West
+Branch.[9]
+
+The impact of events upon the settlement of the Fair Play territory is
+particularly apparent when one examines the periods of immigration to
+and emigration from the region. Three events seemed to have had the
+greatest influence upon the immigration: the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in
+1768, which extended the Provincial limits to Lycoming Creek in this
+region, and the resultant opening of the Land Office for claims in the
+"New Purchase" on April 3, 1769;[10] the almost complete evacuation of
+the territory in the "Great Runaway" of the summer of 1778, which was
+prompted by Indian attacks and the fear of a great massacre comparable
+to the "Wyoming Valley Massacre" of that same year;[11] and finally, the
+Stanwix Treaty of 1784, which brought the Fair Play area within the
+limits of the Province.[12]
+
+The first Stanwix Treaty, made by Sir William Johnson with the Six
+Nations in November of 1768, extended the legitimate line of English
+colonial settlement from the line established by the Proclamation of
+1763 to a point on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River at the mouth
+of Lycoming Creek (the Tiadaghton, as it was so ambiguously
+labeled).[13] This extension, ostensibly for the purpose of providing
+lands for the colonial veterans of the French and Indian War, became a
+boon to speculators and an inducement to the Scotch-Irish squatters who
+took lands beyond the limits of this "New Purchase" in what was to
+become the Fair Play territory.
+
+In the summer of 1778 the war whoop once again caused the settlers of
+the West Branch Valley to flee from their homes for fear of a repetition
+of the Wyoming Massacre. The peril of the moment is vividly described in
+this communication to the Executive Council in Philadelphia from Colonel
+Samuel Hunter, commander of Fort Augusta:
+
+    The Carnage at Wioming, the devastations and murders upon the West
+    branch of Susquehanna, On Bald Eagle Creek, and in short throughout
+    the whole County to within a few miles of these Towns (the recital
+    of which must be shocking) I suppose must have before now have
+    reached your ears, if not you may figure yourselves men, women, and
+    children, Butchered and scalped, many of them after being promised
+    quarters, and some scalped alive, of which we have miserable
+    Instances amongst us.... I have only to add that A few Hundreds of
+    men well armed and immediately sent to our relief would prevent much
+    bloodshed, confusion and devastation ... as the appearance of being
+    supported would call back many of our fugitives to save their
+    Harvest for their subsistence, rather than suffer the inconveniences
+    which reason tells me they do down the Country and their with their
+    families return must ease the people below of a heavy and
+    unprofitable Burthen.[14]
+
+Robert Covenhoven, who lived at the mouth of the Loyalsock Creek and who
+fled to Sunbury (Fort Augusta) also, described the flight:
+
+    Such a sight I never saw in my life. Boats, canoes, hog-troughs,
+    rafts hastily made of dry sticks, every sort of floating article,
+    had been put in requisition, and were crowded with women, children,
+    and plunder. There were several hundred people in all.... The whole
+    convoy arrived safely at Sunbury, leaving the entire range of farms
+    along the West Branch to the ravages of the Indians.[15]
+
+In this eighteenth-century Dunkirk, the West Branch Valley was
+practically cleared of settlers.
+
+The Indians, it is true, proved troublesome to the entire advancing
+American frontier; but unlike the French, whose menacing forts had been
+removed in the recent wars, the Indians were unable to halt the westward
+penetration. An expedition under the leadership of Colonel Thomas
+Hartley was sent out expressly for the purpose of boosting morale in the
+West Branch Valley following the Wyoming Massacre and the Great Runaway.
+Colonel Hartley's letter to Thomas McKean, chief justice of Pennsylvania
+and a member of the Continental Congress, gives bitter testimony to the
+conditions which he observed in September of 1778:
+
+    You heard of the Distresses of these Frontiers they are truly
+    great--The People which we found were Difident and timid The Panick
+    had not yet left them--many a wealthy Family reduced to Poverty &
+    without a home, some had lost their Husbands their children or
+    Friends--all was gloomy.... the Barbarians do now and then attack an
+    unarmed man a Helpless Mother or Infant....
+
+The colonel indicated, however, that strong militia support and some
+offensive action would restore confidence and cause the people to return
+to the valley. His interpretation of the significance of his mission is
+quite clearly stated in the conclusion of his letter: "We shall not have
+it in our Power to gain Honour or Laurels on these Frontiers but we have
+the Satisfaction to think we save our Country...." Hartley's solution to
+the Indian problem, which had driven off the settlers, was to expel them
+"beyond the Lakes" excepting only the more civilized Tuscaroras and
+Oneidas.[16]
+
+Despite the danger from the Indians, the Fair Play settlers began
+trickling back to their homes, or what was left of them, toward the end
+of the Revolutionary War. Once the war was ended and the Fair Play
+territory was annexed by subsequent purchase, the mass movement of
+settlers to the West Branch Valley resumed.
+
+Incidentally, Dr. Wallace in his _Conrad Weiser_ assesses one John Henry
+Lydius with the major responsibility for the Indian massacres in central
+and northeastern Pennsylvania. Wallace notes that Lydius' Connecticut
+purchase from the Indians in 1754 caused "war between Pennsylvania and
+Connecticut and ... [precipitated] the Massacre of Wyoming in 1778."
+This massacre, as West Branch historians know, had its subsequent impact
+on the West Branch Valley in the Great Runaway, although the Winters
+Massacre of June 10, 1778, which prompted the evacuation of the valley,
+actually preceded the Wyoming affair.[17]
+
+Finally, the purchase of the remaining Indian lands in Pennsylvania
+(except for the small corner of the Erie Triangle) was made on October
+3, 1784, in a second Stanwix Treaty. This accession ended the
+Pennsylvania boundary dispute with the Six Nations; and it also ended
+the need for any extra-legal system of government in the West Branch
+Valley, for this new treaty encompassed the Fair Play territory.[18]
+However, this treaty raised the troublesome Tiadaghton question once
+again, a question only partly resolved by the Legislature's designation
+of Lycoming Creek as the Tiadaghton and the recognition of the
+squatters' right of pre-emption to their settlements along the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna.[19] The land office was opened for the sale
+of this purchase July 1, 1785; by 1786 fifty heads of families were
+listed for State taxes in Northumberland County.[20] Approximately fifty
+per cent of these taxables had been in the area earlier.
+
+Perhaps the only significant nationality trend to be noted in this
+important sequence of events is the tenacity of the Scotch-Irish and the
+subsequent increase of English and German settlers following this last
+"New Purchase."[21] Over half of the taxables in Pine Creek Township,
+the new designation for much of the Fair Play territory after it became
+an official part of the Province, were Scotch-Irish. As a result, these
+Scots from the north of Ireland continued to maintain their position of
+leadership even after the area was included in the Commonwealth.
+
+The reasons for migrating to the West Branch Valley in this fifteen-year
+period from 1769 to 1784 were varied and numerous. For the most part,
+the various nationality groups which emigrated from Europe came for
+economic opportunity and because of religious and political
+persecutions. Their movement to the frontier regions was prompted by
+similar problems. In fact, much the same as the earlier settlers of
+Jamestown and Plymouth, the squatters of the West Branch Valley came for
+gain and for God. Furthermore, the promise of Penn's "Holy Experiment,"
+in which men of diverse backgrounds could live together peacefully in
+religious freedom and political equality, encouraged them to come to
+Pennsylvania. However, once the dominant group of the Fair Play
+frontier, the Scotch-Irish, arrived in Pennsylvania, they found
+themselves unsuited to the settled areas. The natural enemy of the
+English, who had oppressed them at home, these settlers soon found
+themselves repeating the Old World conflicts. In addition, the German
+Pietists caused them further embarrassment in their new homes. Their
+Calvinism, fierce political independence, and earnest desire for land
+and opportunity soon made them _personae non gratae_ in the established
+areas. Hence, they migrated to the frontier areas and even beyond the
+limits of Provincial interference and control.[22]
+
+The paucity of population data makes impossible any extensive analysis
+of the stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers. However, the
+tax lists, both in the published archives and in the files of the county
+commissioners in Northumberland County, offer limited evidence for the
+early years, though they provide ample data for the years after 1773.
+Prior to the Great Runaway in 1778, tax lists are available for the
+entire county of Northumberland; the lists simply indicate the taxable's
+township, acreage, and tax. Records in the Northumberland County
+courthouse give the assessments for 1773, 1774, 1776, and 1778.
+
+Due to the fact that the Fair Play territory was outside the Provincial
+limits until after the purchase of Fort Stanwix in 1784, the assessment
+lists give only those persons residing within Northumberland County. As
+a result, there were only six to twelve settlers who associated with the
+Fair Play men who were included in the lists for 1773-1778. Chart 4
+indicates the names, national origins, and years listed for those
+settlers.
+
+
+ CHART 4
+
+ Fair Play Settlers on the Tax Rolls 1773-1778.[23]
+
+ Name                   National Origin  1773  1774  1776  1778
+ ==============================================================
+ James Alexander          Scotch-Irish     x     x
+ George Calhoune          Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ Cleary Campbell          Scotch-Irish           x
+ William Campbell, Jr.    Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ William Campbell, Jr.    Scotch-Irish                 x     x
+ John Clark               English                x
+ Thomas Forster           English          x     x     x     x
+ James Irwin              Scotch-Irish     x     x     x     x
+ John Jamison             English                            x
+ Isaiah Jones             Welsh                  x
+ Robert King              German           x           x     x
+ John Price               Welsh                  x     x
+                                          ---   ---   ---   ---
+ Totals                                    6     8     7     7
+ --------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+From these limited data one obviously concludes that the Scotch-Irish
+were not only the most numerous but also the most persistent of these
+frontiersmen. Also, nine of these men, that is all except Clark, Jones,
+and King, appear on the tax lists for Northumberland County for the year
+1785.[24] Interestingly enough, six of these nine were Scotch-Irish; and
+although our sample is limited, it is readily apparent that the stalwart
+Scots had a way of "hanging on." It would be presumptuous to conclude
+that seventy-five per cent of the residents before 1778 returned by
+1785; but it is fact that some forty families had made improvements in
+the area by 1773 when William Cooke was sent out by the Land Office to
+"Warn the People of[f] the unpurchased Land."[25] Furthermore, as
+indicated earlier, some fifty families appear on the assessments for
+1786, more than half of whom had been in the region before.
+
+Any effort to analyze the population in terms of stability and mobility
+runs head-on into the creation of new townships in the 1780's, the
+inability to establish death rates for this frontier, and the inadequacy
+of probate records. The result is that the data are intuitively rather
+than statistically sound. Chart 5 offers a comparison of tax lists over
+a period of nine years as the basis for some conclusions regarding the
+stability and mobility of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+
+ CHART 5
+
+ Population Stability and Mobility
+ Based Upon a Comparison of Tax Lists
+ For the Period From 1778 to 1787.[26]
+
+                         1778-80  1781  1783-84  1786  1787
+ ==========================================================
+ Number of residents
+   assessed                 27     29      34     40    68
+ Number appearing on
+   previous assessments      6     19      21     14    33
+ ----------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Except for the 1783-84 figures, all of the tax data are for State taxes.
+The exception is the listing for the federal supply tax in 1783-84. The
+steady growth rate of the area is easily recognizable both in raw
+figures and in percentages. Beginning with an increase of a little more
+than seven per cent between the first two listings, we find a seventy
+per cent increase in the final figures. The tremendous increase in the
+last two assessments may be due to the purchase of 1784 and the
+subsequent legitimizing of claims through the establishment of
+pre-emption rights.
+
+The stability of the population is particularly noted in the
+consistently high percentage of residents with some tenure in the
+valley. Furthermore, the apparent contradiction of this statement by the
+decline to fourteen residents in the 1786 listing who had once left and
+then returned is offset when one examines the neighboring township
+assessments for that same year. Here fourteen additional names of former
+Fair Play settlers are to be found which would sustain the
+characteristic pattern of tenure. The statistical problem is complicated
+by the creation of new townships following the purchase of 1784. Pine
+Creek and Lycoming were the new designations for the former Fair Play
+territory, Pine Creek running from the creek of that same name west, and
+Lycoming extending from Pine Creek east to Lycoming Creek.
+
+Petitions from the area in 1778, 1781, and 1784 give a similar picture.
+Almost half of the names which are found on the tax lists appear on two
+or more of these appeals. These include a distress petition in June of
+1778, and petitions asking recognition of pre-emption rights in 1781 and
+1784.[27] The signatures on the petitions range in number from
+thirty-nine to fifty-one, and at least twenty-four of these settlers
+signed two or more of these documents. The very nature of these
+petitions, particularly the later ones, indicates the tremendous desire
+on the part of these sturdy pioneers to remain in or return to their
+homes in the West Branch Valley. Here too, however, this tenacity of
+purpose is not strictly confined to the Scotch-Irish.
+
+What conclusions can be drawn from this analysis of the demographic
+factors in the Fair Play settlement? Particularly evident is the
+dominance of the Scotch-Irish, who numerically composed the greatest
+national stock group in the population. This dominance, as we have
+already noted, greatly influenced the political and social institutions
+of the area. Secondly, one might consider the numbers of English
+settlers, as compared with the number of Germans, surprising. As a
+matter of fact, if one adds the numbers of Scots and Welsh inhabitants
+to the English and Scotch-Irish, the result is an "English" percentage
+of seventy-seven and one half for the entire population. Thus it is
+quite logical to assume that English customs and language would prevail,
+and they did. Incidentally, it should be added that the "English" nature
+of the population, combined with the Scotch-Irish plurality, meant that
+the Scotch-Irish were more representative of this frontier than they
+were innovators of its customs and values.
+
+If a majority of the Fair Play settlers came from the British Isles,
+from where did they emigrate in America? Here it is quite clear that
+these frontiersmen were predominantly from the lower Susquehanna Valley
+and southeastern Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania was to them a land of
+liberty and opportunity;[28] and when they failed to find these
+privileges in the settled areas, they moved out on the frontier where
+they could make their own rules, that is to say, establish their own
+familiar institutions. The result was the Fair Play system.
+
+Although the Fair Play settlers came to America and central Pennsylvania
+for the usual political, economic, and social reasons, the two Stanwix
+treaties and the Indian raids of 1778 had the most influence on
+population fluctuations. The pioneers came into the territory
+over-reaching the limits of the "New Purchase" of 1768. They were driven
+out, almost to a man, in the Great Runaway of 1778. And finally, they
+returned after the second "New Purchase" in 1784, which resulted in the
+recognition of their pre-emption claims for their earlier illegal
+settlements. It is interesting to note that pre-emption claims were
+recognized in the West Branch Valley some forty-five years prior to
+federal legislation to that effect.[29]
+
+Despite fluctuations in the population, the Scotch-Irish were able to
+maintain their hold over the valley and thus influence the pattern of
+development for this frontier outpost. Horace Walpole, addressing the
+English Parliament during the American Revolution, said, "There is no
+use crying about it. Cousin America has run off with a Presbyterian
+parson, and that is the end of it."[30] The Scotch-Irish with their
+Presbyterianism had run off with the West Branch Valley as well; and
+their independent spirit would see them in the foreground of the
+"noblest rupture in the history of mankind." That independent spirit and
+leadership is particularly noted in the political system which they
+established along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Their "Fair
+Play system" is the primary concern of the next chapter.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] E. Melvin Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," _Americana_,
+XVII (1923), 382.
+
+[2] This chart was compiled by making a list of eighty names appearing
+in an article on the genealogy of the Fair Play men, Helen Herritt
+Russell, "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and Their
+Government," _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XII (1958), 16-43. Mrs. Russell is genealogist of the
+Fort Antes chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution in Jersey
+Shore, Pa. The names were checked in Meginness and Linn for possible
+national origin. Approximately one-fourth were verified in these
+sources. Although this writer questioned the validity of the geographic
+conclusions of Meginness and Linn, both have ample documentation for
+their findings regarding genealogy and national origins. These findings
+can be validated in the published archives. The entire sample of names
+was submitted to Dr. Samuel P. Bayard, a folklore specialist and
+professor of English at the Pennsylvania State University, whose
+determination was made on the basis of linguistic techniques.
+
+[3] Popular control was an American rather than a Scottish influence
+necessitated by the absence of sufficient numbers of ministers. In
+Scotland, the minister chose his elders and thus dominated the session;
+in America, the selection was made by the congregation. _See_ James G.
+Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish: A Social History_ (Chapel Hill, 1962), p.
+150.
+
+[4] Carl Wittke, _We Who Built America_ (Cleveland, 1963), p. 57.
+
+[5] American Council of Learned Societies, "Report of Committee on
+Linguistic and National Stocks in the Population of the United States,"
+_Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1931_
+(Washington, 1932), I, 124.
+
+[6] This summary has been prepared from three main sources: Wayland F.
+Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_ (Hamden, Conn.,
+1962), pp. 89-91; Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), pp. 161-167; and John
+B. Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania_
+(Philadelphia, 1883), pp. 447, 481-482.
+
+[7] Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.
+
+[8] Wayland F. Dunaway, _A History of Pennsylvania_ (Englewood Cliffs,
+N. J., 1948), pp. 131-137. According to John Bacon Deans, "The Migration
+of the Connecticut Yankees to the West Branch of the Susquehanna River,"
+_The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and
+Addresses_, XX (1954), 34-35, eighty-two Yankees came to Warrior's Run
+in September of 1775, but none went farther west.
+
+[9] Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., The
+Zebulon Butler Papers, Jonas Davis to Zebulon Butler, March 16, 1773.
+
+[10] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 340.
+
+[11] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 475; Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), pp. 508-511.
+
+[12] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 477; Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 666.
+
+[13] O'Callaghan, _Documentary History of the State of New York_, I,
+587-591.
+
+[14] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 509. This July 12, 1778,
+communication from Colonel Hunter did not fall on deaf ears, for Colonel
+Thomas Hartley was ordered to the area with his regiment before the
+summer was out.
+
+[15] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 475.
+
+[16] Richmond D. Williams, "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778,"
+_Now and Then_, XII (1960), 258-259.
+
+[17] Wallace, _Conrad Weiser_, pp. 362-363. Lydius had gotten the
+Indians drunk following the settlement at Albany between the Six Nations
+and the Proprietaries. This boundary line (Albany) "crossed the West
+Branch below the Big Island," p. 374.
+
+[18] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XI, 508.
+
+[19] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 667.
+
+[20] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 477.
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 711-713.
+
+[21] The ambiguity of the term "New Purchase" becomes apparent once it
+is recognized that territorial acquisitions of both Stanwix treaties
+adopted that appellation.
+
+[22] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 28-49.
+
+[23] Northumberland County Courthouse, Sunbury, Pa., Penns & C.
+1782-1811 Tax Assessments, Cabinet #1. This book, found in the cellar of
+the courthouse, also contains the Pine Creek assessment for 1789.
+
+[24] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 618-622.
+
+[25] _Pennsylvania Archives_, First Series, XII, 286-287. The squatters,
+apparently warned in advance, had practically all vacated the premises.
+However, neighbors across the river willingly gave their names.
+
+[26] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 437, 468, 557, 711,
+790.
+
+[27] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III (1875), 217, 518-522.
+The original petitions of 1781 and 1784 are located in the State
+Archives, Harrisburg.
+
+[28] Penn's colony was well advertised, and the emphasis upon liberty of
+conscience, when contrasted with the restrictions of the Test Act, gives
+ample support for the significance of liberty as a motivating factor.
+However, economic causes predominated.
+
+[29] Ray Allen Billington, _Westward Expansion_ (New York, 1960), p.
+380. Billington refers here to the distribution-pre-emption measure of
+1841, whereas Congress actually recognized squatters' rights in the act
+of 1830.
+
+[30] Williams, "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," p. 382.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER THREE
+
+_The Politics of Fair Play_
+
+
+The political system of these predominantly Scotch-Irish squatters in
+the Susquehanna Valley, along the West Branch, offers a vivid
+demonstration of the impact of the frontier on the development of
+democratic institutions. Occupying lands beyond the reach of the
+Provincial legislature, with some forty families of mixed national
+origin in residence by 1773, these frontier "outlaws" had to devise some
+solution to the question of authority in their territory.[1] Their
+solution was the extra-legal creation of _de facto_ rule historically
+known as the Fair Play system. The following is a contemporary
+description of that system:
+
+    There existed a great number of locations of the third of April,
+    1769, for the choicest lands on the West Branch of Susquehanna,
+    between the mouths of _Lycoming_ and _Pine creeks_; but the
+    proprietaries, from extreme caution, the result of that experience,
+    which had also produced the very penal laws of 1768, and 1769, and
+    the proclamation already stated, had prohibited any surveys being
+    made beyond the _Lycoming_. In the mean time, in violation of all
+    law, a set of hardy adventurers, had from time to time, seated
+    themselves on this doubtful territory. They made improvements, and
+    formed a very considerable population. It is true, so far as
+    regarded the rights to real property, they were not under the
+    protection of the laws of the country; and were we to adopt the
+    visionary theories of some philosophers, who have drawn their
+    arguments from a supposed state of nature, we might be led to
+    believe that the state of these people would have been a state of
+    continual warfare; and that in contests for property the weakest
+    must give way to the strongest. To prevent the consequences, real
+    or supposed, of this state of things, they formed a mutual compact
+    among themselves. They annually elected a tribunal, in rotation, of
+    three of their settlers, whom they called _fair play men_, who were
+    to decide all controversies, and settle disputed boundaries. From
+    their decision there was no appeal. There could be no resistance.
+    The decree was enforced by the whole body, who started up in mass,
+    at the mandate of the court, and execution and eviction was as
+    sudden, and irresistible as the judgment. Every new comer was
+    obliged to apply to this powerful tribunal, and upon his solemn
+    engagement to submit in all respects, _to the law of the land_, he
+    was permitted to take possession of some vacant spot. Their decrees
+    were, however, just; and when their settlements were recognized by
+    law, and _fair play_ had ceased, their decisions were received in
+    evidence, and confirmed by judgments of courts.[2]
+
+The idea of authority from the people was nothing new; in fact, it is as
+old as the Greeks. Nor is the concept of a "social compact," here
+implied, particularly novel to the American scene. The theory was that
+people hitherto unconnected assembled and gave their consent to be
+governed by a certain ruler or rulers under some particular form of
+government.[3] Theoretically justified by John Locke in his persuasive
+defense of the Glorious Revolution, it had been practiced in Plymouth,
+Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire, where practical necessity
+had required it for settlements occasionally made outside charter
+limits. The frontier, whether in New England or in the West Branch
+Valley, created a practical necessity which made popular consent the
+basis of an actual government.
+
+They were not "covenanters" in the Congregational sense of having
+brought an established church with them to the Fair Play territory. But
+the Fair Play settlers understood and subscribed to the principle of
+popular control, which was fundamental to such solemnly made and
+properly ratified agreements. Separated from the authority of the crown,
+detached from the authority of the hierarchy of the church by the
+Protestant Reformation, possessing no American tradition of extensive
+political experience, these settlers could only depend upon themselves
+as proper authorities for their own political system.
+
+Furthermore, the great majority of the settlers who came to the Fair
+Play territory came from families who had left their homes in the old
+country to escape political, economic, and social restrictions, only to
+be made unwelcome in their new homes in the settled areas of
+Pennsylvania. Displaced persons in a new country, they were forced by
+lives of conflict to seek better opportunity by moving to undeveloped
+lands. As a result, they settled along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna, beyond the authority of the crown and outside the pressures
+of the Provincial legislature.
+
+If man is a predatory beast in his natural state, a belief some
+expressed in the eighteenth century, then it follows naturally that
+every society must have some agency of authority and control. The
+universally standardized solution to the problem of social control is
+government. The Fair Play system was the answer on this Susquehanna
+frontier to the need for some legitimate agency of force.[4] This system
+vested authority in the people through annual elections of a tribunal of
+three of their number. The members of the tribunal were given
+quasi-executive, legislative, and judicial powers over all the settlers
+in the West Branch Valley "beyond the purchase line."[5]
+
+Although no record of any of these elections has been preserved, the
+composition of the Fair Play tribunal in 1776 has been established and
+verified by subsequent reviews of land claims in the county courts.[6]
+Also, two of the members of the tribunal of 1775 are identified in a
+pre-emption claim made before the Lycoming County Court in 1797.[7] It
+is interesting to note that among these five men are represented the
+three most prominent national stock groups in the area, with the
+Scotch-Irish, as our earlier sample demonstrated, in the majority.
+
+Lacking returns of the annual elections of the tribunal and minutes of
+its actual meetings, we have only Smith's _Laws of the Commonwealth of
+Pennsylvania_, petitions from the Fair Play settlers, and the subsequent
+review of land questions by the Northumberland and Lycoming County
+courts to evaluate the tribunal, its members, and its procedures.
+However, these data are more than adequate in giving us a picture of
+this _de facto_, though illegal, rule, which existed in the West Branch
+Valley until the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784 brought the territory
+under Commonwealth jurisdiction. The composition of the electorate
+varied with the fluctuations in population caused by the two Stanwix
+treaties, the Revolution, and the Great Runaway.
+
+Since property and religious qualifications were the primary
+prerequisites to voting at this time, it seems logical to assume that a
+similar basis for suffrage operated in the West Branch Valley.[8] Having
+no regular church--the first, a Presbyterian, was not organized until
+1792--property qualifications appear to have been the basis for what, in
+this area, was practically universal manhood suffrage. Due to the fact
+that the entire settlement consisted of squatters, practically all of
+the heads of households were property holders, regardless of the
+questionable legality of their holdings. The tax lists indicate holdings
+of some 100 to 300 acres on the average for residents, so it is
+particularly difficult to know whether or not a minimum holding
+requirement prevailed. The Provincial suffrage requirement in this
+period was generally fifty acres of land or L50 of personal property.[9]
+
+Although this study encompasses a fifteen-year period from 1769 to 1784,
+it appears that the Fair Play system functioned for about five years,
+from 1773 to 1778. This is due to the fact that only "fourty
+Improvements,"[10] meaning forty family settlements, existed in the area
+by 1773, and that following the Great Runaway of 1778, the territory was
+almost devoid of settlers. The void was filled, however, when settlers
+began returning toward the end of the Revolution and following the
+accession of the territory in the second Stanwix Treaty, in 1784. Thus,
+for all practical purposes, the functioning of the Fair Play system was
+confined to this more limited time. Furthermore, the system was
+supplemented in 1776 by the introduction of the Committee of Safety, and
+later that year by the Council of Safety.[11]
+
+As is indicated in Smith's _Laws_, annual meetings were held to select
+the governing tribunal of three for the ensuing year. Generally convened
+at some readily accessible place, these sessions were presumably held in
+the open or at one of the frontier forts erected in the area: Fort
+Antes, across the river from Jersey Shore; or Fort Horn, located on the
+south side of the Susquehanna about eight miles west of Jersey Shore.
+There were frontier forts in the vicinity of the present Muncy--Fort
+Muncy--and Lock Haven--Fort Reed; but Fort Muncy was some twenty-odd
+miles east of the Fair Play territory and Fort Reed was beyond the Great
+Island at its western extremity. As a result, these outposts were
+unlikely meeting places for the tribunal or for its election.[12]
+Unfortunately, there is no recorded evidence of a specific meeting of
+the Fair Play men.
+
+The authority of the Fair Play tribunal extended across the entire
+territory from Lycoming Creek to the Great Island on the north side of
+the West Branch of the Susquehanna. However, most of the disputed cases,
+which can be verified by subsequent court reviews in either
+Northumberland or Lycoming counties, seem to have involved land claims
+in the area between Lycoming and Pine creeks. The tribunal accepted or
+rejected claims for settlement in the area and decided boundary
+questions and other controversies among settlers.[13] As to a specific
+code of laws, there is none of record. However, the cases subsequently
+reviewed in the established county courts refer to some of their regular
+practices. For example, any man who left his improvement for six weeks
+without leaving someone to continue it, lost his right to the
+improvement;[14] any man who went into the army could count on the Fair
+Play men (the tribunal) to protect his property;[15] any man who sought
+land in the territory was obliged to obtain not only the approval of the
+Fair Play men but also of his nearest potential neighbors;[16] and the
+summary process of ejectment which the Fair Play men exercised was real
+and certain and sometimes supported by the militia.[17]
+
+The specific membership of the Fair Play tribunal is rather difficult to
+ascertain due to its failure to keep minutes of its proceedings and the
+absence of any recorded code. However, as indicated earlier,[18] the
+existence of the tribunal between the years 1773 and 1778, and its
+actual composition in 1775 and 1776, have already been established from
+the review of its decisions by the Circuit Court of Lycoming County.
+Assuming the principle of rotation from a contemporary description,
+some eighteen settlers held the positions of authority during the years
+noted.[19] The cases reviewed reveal the names of five of these
+eighteen. Recognizing the limitations of our twenty-eight per cent
+sampling, however, it is interesting to note that the three major
+national stocks are represented in this restricted sample. Furthermore,
+as was mentioned previously,[20] the Scotch-Irish settlers, being in the
+majority, enjoyed the majority representation on the tribunal. An
+analysis of leadership in the territory, to be developed more fully
+later, leads one to conclude that the Scotch-Irish, in the main, were
+the political leaders of the area.[21]
+
+A diligent search of some sixty cases in the Court of Common Pleas in
+both Northumberland and Lycoming counties yielded some documentary
+evidence regarding the procedures of the Fair Play tribunal.[22] Three
+cases in Lycoming County and one from Northumberland County contain
+depositions which describe the activities of the Fair Play men in some
+detail. One case, _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, was appealed to the Supreme
+Court of the Commonwealth. All of the cases deal with the question of
+title to lands in the Fair Play territory following the purchase of
+these lands at the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784. The depositions taken
+in conjunction with these cases indicate the processes of settlement and
+ejectment, in addition to the policies regarding land tenure. The
+fairness of the Fair Play decisions is noted by the fact that the
+regular courts concurred with the earlier judgments of the tribunal.[23]
+
+An anecdote involving one of the Fair Play men, Peter Rodey, illustrates
+the nature of this frontier justice. According to legend, Chief Justice
+McKean of the State Supreme Court was holding court in this district,
+and, curious about the principles or code of the Fair Play men, he
+inquired about them of Peter Rodey, a former member of the tribunal.
+Rodey, unable to recall the details of the code, simply replied: "All I
+can say is, that since your Honor's coorts have come among us, _fair
+play_ has entirely ceased, and law has taken its place."[24]
+
+The justice of "fair play" and the nature of the system can be seen from
+an analysis of the cases reviewed subsequently in the established
+courts. As mentioned previously, these cases describe the procedures
+regarding settlement, land tenure, and ejectment. Although no recorded
+code of laws has been located, references to "resolutions of the Fair
+Play men" regularly appear in the depositions and summaries of these
+cases.[25] According to Leyburn, a customary "law" concerning settlement
+rights operated on the frontier, particularly among the
+Scotch-Irish.[26] This "law" recognized three settlement rights: "corn
+right," which established claims to 100 acres for each acre of grain
+planted; "tomahawk right," which marked off the area claimed by
+deadening trees at the boundaries of the claim; and, "cabin right,"
+which confirmed the claim by the construction of a cabin upon the
+premises. If the decisions of the regular courts are at all indicative,
+Fair Play settlement was generally based upon "cabin right." However,
+the frequent allusion to "improvements" implies some secondary
+consideration to what Leyburn has defined as "corn right."
+
+In the case of _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, the significance of
+"improvements," or "corn rights," vis-a-vis "cabin rights" is
+particularly noted.[27] The following summary of that case, found in
+_Pennsylvania Reports_, emphasizes that significance, in addition to
+defining a Fair Play "code" pertaining to land tenure:
+
+    THIS was an ejectment for 324 acres of land, part of the Indian
+    lands in _Northumberland_ county.
+
+    The plaintiff claimed under a warrant issued on the 2d _May_ 1785,
+    for the premises, and a survey made thereon upon the 10th _January_
+    1786. The defendant, on the 20th _June_ 1785, entered a caveat
+    against the claims of the plaintiff, and on the 5th _October_
+    following, took out a warrant for the land in dispute, on which he
+    was then settled. Both claimed the pre-emption under the act of 21st
+    _December_ 1784,[28] and on the evidence given the facts appeared to
+    be:
+
+    That in 1773, one _James Hughes_, a brother of the plaintiff,
+    settled on the lands in question and made some small improvements.
+    In the next year he enlarged his improvement, and cut logs to build
+    an house. In the winter following he went to his father's in
+    _Donegal_ in _Lancaster_ county, and died there. His elder brother
+    _Thomas_ was at that time settled on the Indian land, and one of the
+    "Fair Play Men," who had assembled together and made a resolution,
+    (which they agreed to enforce as the law of the place,) that "if any
+    person was absent from his "settlement for six weeks he should
+    forfeit his right." [Quotation marks as published.]
+
+    In the spring of 1775 the defendant came to the settlement, and was
+    advised by the Fair Play Men to settle on the premises which
+    _Hughes_ had left; this he did, and built a cabin. The plaintiff
+    soon after came, claiming it in right of his brother, and aided by
+    _Thomas Hughes_, took possession of the cabin; but the defendant
+    collecting his friends, an affray ensued, in which _Hughes_ was
+    beaten off and the defendant left in possession. He continued to
+    improve, built an house and stable, and cleared about ten acres. In
+    1778 he was driven off by the enemy and entered into the army. At
+    the close of the war, both plaintiff and defendant returned to the
+    settlement, each claiming the land in dispute.
+
+    The warrant was taken out in the name of _James Hughes_, (the father
+    of the plaintiff who is since dead,) for the benefit of his
+    children.
+
+    After argument by Mr. _Charles Smith_ and Mr. _Duncan_ for the
+    plaintiff, and Mr. _Daniel Smith_ and Mr. _Read_ for the defendant,
+    Justice _Shippen_ in the charge of the court to the jury, said--
+
+    The dispute here, is between a first improvement, and a subsequent
+    but much more valuable improvement. But neither of the parties has
+    any legal or equitable right, but under the act of the 21st
+    _December_ 1784. The settlement on this land was against law. It was
+    an offence that tended to involve this country in blood. But the
+    merit and sufferings of the actual settlers cancelled the offence,
+    and the legislature, mindful of their situation, provided this
+    special act for their relief. The preamble recites their "resolute
+    stand and sufferings," as deserving a right of pre-emption. The
+    legislature had no eye to any person who was not one of the
+    occupiers after the commencement of the war, and a transient settler
+    removed, (no matter how,) is not an object of the law. This is our
+    construction of the act. _James Hughes_ under whom the plaintiff
+    claims, died before the war, the other occupied the premises after,
+    and in the language of the act, "stood and suffered." If this
+    construction be right, the cause is at an end.
+
+    Besides, the plaintiff claims as the heir of _Thomas_, who was the
+    heir of _James_, the first settler. I will not say that the fair
+    play men could make a law to bind the settlers; but they might by
+    agreement bind themselves. Now _Thomas_ was one of these, and was
+    bound by his conduct, from disputing the right of the defendant.
+
+    This warrant it seems, is taken out in the name of the father, and
+    it is said, as a trustee for his children. It is sometimes done for
+    the benefit of all concerned. If this be the case, it may be well
+    enough; but still it is not so regular, as it might have been[.]
+    With these observations, we submit it to you.
+
+                                        Verdict for the defendant.[29]
+
+This case, although originated in the Northumberland County Court in
+1786, was appealed to the State Supreme Court, where the lower court
+decision was affirmed in 1791. The summary runs the gamut of Fair Play
+procedures from settlement, through questions of tenure, to ejectment.
+Its completeness indicates its usefulness. Partial and occasional
+depositions in the other cases cited help to round out the picture of
+the Fair Play "code."
+
+For example, the right of settlement included not only the approval of
+the Fair Play men, but also the acceptance of the prospective
+landholder by his neighbors. Allusions to this effect are made in the
+Coldren deposition as well as in the Huff-Latcha case. Eleanor Coldren's
+deposition, made at Sunbury, June 7, 1797, concerns the disputed title
+to certain lands of her deceased husband, Abraham Dewitt, opposite the
+Great Island. Her comments about neighbor approval demonstrate the
+point. She says, for instance, that
+
+    ... in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and Cookson Long, two of the
+    Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the deponent's house, next below
+    Barnabas Bonner's Improvement, where Deponent's Husband kept a
+    Tavern, and heard Antes and Long say that they (meaning the
+    Fair-Play Men) and the Neighbors of the Settlement had unanimously
+    agreed that James Irvin, James Parr, Abraham Dewitt and Barnabas
+    Bonner should ... have their Improvement Rights fitted....
+
+She speaks of the resolution of the claims problem "as being the
+unanimous agreement of the Neighbors and Fair-Play Men...."[30]
+
+William King, who temporarily claimed part of the land involved in the
+dispute between Edmund Huff and Jacob Latcha, also refers to neighbor
+approval in his deposition taken in that case. He said, "I first went to
+Edmund Huff, then to Thomas Kemplen, Samuel Dougherty, William McMeans,
+and Thomas Ferguson, and asked if they would accept me as a
+neighbor...."[31]
+
+Land tenure policy is noted by this same William King in the case of
+_James Grier_ vs. _William Tharpe_. Repeating what we have already
+pointed out in the case of _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, King testified that
+"there was a law among the Fair-play men by which any man, who absented
+himself for the space of six weeks, lost his right to his
+improvement."[32] In the Huff-Latcha case, King recounts the case of one
+Joseph Haines who "had once a right ... but had forfeited his right by
+the Fair-play law...."[33]
+
+The forfeiture rule was tempered, however, in cases involving military
+service. Bratton Caldwell's deposition in _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_ is a case
+in point. Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men in 1776, declared that
+"Greer went into the army in 1776 and was a wagon-master till the fall
+of 1778.... In July, 1778, the Runaway, John Martin, had come on the
+land in his absence. The Fair-play men put Greer in possession. If a man
+went into the army, the Fair-play men protected his property."[34]
+Meginness mentions a similar decision in the case of John Toner and
+Morgan Sweeney.[35] Sweeney had attempted to turn a lease for
+improvements in Toner's behalf to possession for himself, but the
+Northumberland County Court honored the Fair Play rule concerning
+military service and decided in favor of Toner.
+
+The summary process of ejectment utilized by the Fair Play men,
+occasionally with militia support, is evident from William King's
+deposition in the Huff-Latcha case. King, having sold his right to one
+William Paul, recounts the method as follows:
+
+    William Paul went on the land and finished his cabin. Soon after a
+    party b[r]ought Robert Arthur and built a cabin near Paul's in which
+    Arthur lived. Paul applied to the Fair-play men who decided in favor
+    of Paul. Arthur would not go off. Paul made a complaint to the
+    company at a muster at Quinashahague[36] that Arthur still lived on
+    the land and would not go off, although the Fair-play men had
+    decided against him. I was one of the officers at that time and we
+    agreed to come and run him off. The most of the company came down as
+    far as Edmund Huff's who kept Stills. We got a keg of whisk[e]y and
+    proceeded to Arthur's cabin. He was at home with his rifle in his
+    hand and his wife had a bayonet on a stick, and they threatened
+    death to the first person who would enter the house. The door was
+    shut and Thomas Kemplen, our captain, made a run at the door, burst
+    it open and instantly seized Arthur by the neck. We pulled down the
+    cabin, threw it into the river, lashed two canoes together and put
+    Arthur and his family and his goods into them and sent them down the
+    river. William Paul then lived undisturbed upon the land until the
+    Indians drove us all away.[37] William Paul was then (1778) from
+    home on a militia tour.[38]
+
+Although land disputes offer documentary evidence of the Fair Play
+system, it seems quite likely that the tribunal's jurisdiction extended
+to other matters. A few anecdotes, obviously based quite tenuously upon
+hearsay, will suffice to illustrate. Joseph Antes, son of Colonel Henry
+Antes, used to tell this story: It seems that one Francis Clark, who
+lived just west of Jersey Shore in the Fair Play territory, gained
+possession of a dog which belonged to an Indian. Upon learning of this,
+the Indian appealed to the Fair Play men, who ordered Clark's arrest and
+trial for the alleged theft. Clark was convicted and sentenced to be
+lashed. The punishment was to be inflicted by a person decided by lot,
+the responsibility falling upon the man drawing the red grain of corn
+from a bag containing grains of corn for each man present. Philip Antes
+was the reluctant "winner." The Indian, seeing that the decision of the
+"court" was to be carried out immediately, magnanimously suggested that
+banishment would serve better than flogging. Clark agreed and left for
+the Nippenose Valley, where his settlement is a matter of record.[39]
+
+Another anecdote, if true, gives further testimony to the justice of
+Fair Play. In this instance, a minister and school teacher named Kincaid
+faced the Fair Play tribunal on the charge of abusing his family. Tried
+and convicted, he was sentenced to be ridden on a rail for his
+offense.[40] Here again, the tale, though legendary, is made plausible
+by the established fact of Kincaid's residence in the area.[41]
+
+Doubtless the most notable political action of the Fair Play settlers is
+their declaration of independence, which Meginness calls "a remarkable
+coincidence" because "it took place about the same time that the
+Declaration was signed in Philadelphia!"[42] Aware, as were many of the
+American colonists in the spring and summer of 1776, that independence
+was being debated in Philadelphia, these West Branch pioneers decided to
+absolve themselves from all allegiance to the Crown and declare their
+own independence. Meeting under a large elm on the west bank of Pine
+Creek, mistakenly known as the "Tiadaghton Elm," the Fair Play men and
+settlers simply resolved their own right of self-determination, a
+principle upon which they had been acting for some time. Unfortunately,
+no record of the resolution has been preserved--if it was actually
+written. However, the names of the supposed signers, all bona fide Fair
+Play settlers, have been passed down to the present.[43]
+
+As every careful historian knows, no declaration was signed in
+Philadelphia on July 4, 1776, except by the clerk and presiding officer
+of the Continental Congress. Consequently, the Pine Creek story arouses
+justifiable skepticism. However, there does seem to be some evidence to
+substantiate this famous act.
+
+First of all, Fithian's _Journal_ gives insight into the possible
+motivation for such independent action. In an entry for Thursday, July
+27, 1775, he writes of reviewing "the 'Squires Library," noting that
+"After some Perusal I fix'd in the Farmer's memorable Letters."[44]
+Fithian was reading John Dickinson's _Letters from a Farmer in
+Pennsylvania_, which he had come across in the library of John Fleming,
+his host for a week in the West Branch Valley. Dickinson's dozen
+uncompromising epistles in opposition to the Grenville and Townshend
+programs both inspired and incited liberty-lovers. Furthermore, Fleming
+himself was a leader among the Fair Play settlers, and may have been
+aroused to action by the eloquence of Dickinson's expression. Every idea
+is an incitement to action and the ideas of _Letters from a Farmer_,
+which made Dickinson the chief American propagandist prior to Thomas
+Paine, reached into the frontier of the West Branch Valley.
+
+The best contemporary evidence in support of the Pine Creek declaration
+is found in the widow's pension application of Anna Jackson Hamilton,
+daughter-in-law of Alexander Hamilton, who was one of the early settlers
+and a prominent leader along the West Branch of the Susquehanna. Mrs.
+Hamilton, whose pension application and accompanying statement were
+made in 1858, lived within one mile of the reputedly historic elm. In
+her sworn statement she says, "I remember well the day independence was
+declared on the plains of Pine Creek, seeing such numbers flocking
+there, and Independence being all the talk, I had a knolege of what was
+doing."[45] Her son John corroborates this in his statement that "She
+and an old colored woman are the only persons now living in the country
+who remembers the meeting of the 4th of July, 1776, at Pine Creek. She
+remembers it well."[46] Mrs. Hamilton was ninety years old at the time
+of her declaration, which was made some eighty-two years after the
+celebrated event.[47]
+
+Following the outbreak of the Revolution and the meeting of the Second
+Continental Congress, the Fair Play system of the West Branch Valley was
+soon augmented by another extra-legal organization, the Committee of
+Safety. Ostensibly created for the purpose of raising and equipping a
+"suitable force to form Pennsylvania's quota of the Continental Army,"
+it soon exercised executive authority dually with the assembly.[48] The
+Council of Safety was instituted as the successor to the Committee of
+Safety by a resolution of the Provincial Convention of 1776, then
+meeting in Philadelphia to draw up a new constitution for Pennsylvania.
+It was continued by an act of the assembly that same year. It functioned
+from July 24, 1776, until it was dissolved on December 6, 1777, by a
+proclamation of the Supreme Executive Council.[49] Locally, however,
+the township branches continued to function and were still referred to
+as "committees."
+
+It appears from the resolutions and actions of the local committee that
+the Fair Play men maintained jurisdiction in land questions, but that
+all other cases were within the range of the committee's authority. In
+fact, a resolution dated February 27, 1776, asserted that "the committee
+of Bald Eagle is the most competent judges of the circumstances of the
+people of that township."[50] This resolution was made in conjunction
+with an order from the county committee to prevent the loss of rye and
+other grains which were being "carried out of the township for
+stilling."[51] Although cautioned against "using too much rigor in their
+measures," the committee was advised to find "a medium between seizing
+of property and supplying the wants of the poor."[52] The county
+committee even went so far as to recommend the suppression of such
+practices as "profaning the Sabbath in an unchristian and scandalous
+manner."[53] In April of 1777, the county committee required an oath of
+allegiance from one William Reed, who had refused military service for
+reasons of conscience.[54]
+
+Although Bald Eagle Township did not, at this time, extend into Fair
+Play territory,[55] it is interesting to note that the local committee,
+whose three members frequently changed, often included settlers from
+that territory or those who were in close association with the Fair Play
+men.[56] The Revolution apparently gave a certain quasi-legality to the
+claims of the "outlaws" of the West Branch Valley.
+
+One further political note is worthy of mention. After Lexington and
+Concord and the formation of the various committees of safety, the
+civil officers of Bald Eagle Township, that is to say the constable,
+supervisor, and overseers, were often chosen from among settlers on the
+borders of, or actually in, Fair Play territory.[57]
+
+The politics of fair play then was nothing more than that--fair play. It
+was a pragmatic system which the necessities of the frontier experience,
+more than national or ethnic origin, had developed. The "codes" of
+operation represented a consensus, equally, freely, and fairly arrived
+at--a common "law" based upon general agreement and practical
+acceptance. There were subsequent appeals to regular courts of law, but,
+surprisingly enough, in every instance the fairness of the judgments was
+sustained. No Fair Play decision was reversed. Furthermore, the
+frequency of elections and the use of the principle of rotation in
+office were additional assurances against the usurpation of power by any
+small clique or ruling class. Popular sovereignty, political equality,
+and popular consultation--these were the basic elements of fair play.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] _Colonial Records_, X, 95. The Fair Play settlers were outlawed by a
+proclamation of the Council signed by Governor John Penn on Sept. 20,
+1773. The proclamation was issued "strictly enjoyning and requiring all
+and every Person and Persons, already settled or Residing on any Lands
+beyond the Boundary Line of the Last Indian Purchase, immediately to
+evacuate their illegal Settlements, and to depart and remove themselves
+from the said Lands without Delay, on pain of being prosecuted with the
+utmost rigour of the Law." The "Last Indian Purchase" referred to here
+is, of course, the Stanwix Treaty of 1768.
+
+[2] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[3] Richard W. Leopold and Arthur S. Link (eds.), _Problems in American
+History_ (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957), p. 22. The entire first
+problem in this excellent text deals with the question of authority in
+American government.
+
+[4] This Fair Play system was certainly not unique, for other frontier
+societies employed the same technique, even down to the ruling tribunal
+of three members. See Solon and Elizabeth Buck, _The Planting of
+Civilization in Western Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431, 451.
+However, it must be pointed out that the Bucks' "Fair Play" reference is
+based on Smith, _Laws_, II, 195, which Samuel P. Bates used in "a
+general application of the practice to W. Pa. areas after 1768," in his
+_History of Greene County, Pennsylvania_ (Chicago, 1888). This was the
+interpretation given in a letter from Dr. Alfred P. James to the author,
+July 17, 1963. Dr. James also says that "It is possible that there are
+evidences of Fair Play Men titles in the court records of Washington and
+Greene Counties."
+
+[5] This designation was often employed to classify those settlers who
+took up lands beyond the limits of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768,
+that is to say, west of Lycoming Creek on the north side of the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna.
+
+[6] Russell, "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," p.
+5. Mrs. Russell, whose historical accuracy can be verified through her
+indicated sources, refers to old borough minutes of Jersey Shore as her
+source for the names of the tribunal of 1776, namely, Bartram Caldwell,
+John Walker, and James Brandon. Upon discussing the matter with her, I
+learned that a clipping from an old Jersey Shore paper, now lost, which
+described the minutes, was her actual source. However, adequate
+documentation and meticulous research characterize her work.
+Furthermore, Bratton Caldwell (he signed his name Bartram) is also
+labeled a Fair Play official by Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play
+Settlers, 1773-1785," p. 422. Linn's identification comes in the case of
+_Greer_ vs. _Tharpe_, Greer's case being a pre-emption claim on the
+basis of military service.
+
+[7] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," _Now and Then_, XII (1959), 220-222.
+The deposition reads "That in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and
+Cookson Long, two of the Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the
+deponent's house...."
+
+[8] Oscar T. Barck, Jr. and Hugh T. Lefler, _Colonial America_ (New
+York, 1958), pp. 258-260. Although Barck and Lefler indicate in this
+section on "The Colonial Franchise" that universal suffrage did not
+prevail in the colonies, they do note the significance of "free land,"
+of which Fair Play territory was an excellent example.
+
+[9] _Ibid_, p. 260.
+
+[10] William Cooke to James Tilghman, _Pennsylvania Archives_, First
+Series, XII, 286-287.
+
+[11] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Fourth Series, III, 545-546.
+
+[12] _Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts
+of Pennsylvania_ (Harrisburg, 1896), I, 390, 392, 394-418.
+
+[13] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[14] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 424. This six
+weeks provision is noted in the deposition of John Sutton in the case of
+_William Greer_ vs. _William Tharpe_, dated March 13, 1797.
+
+[15] _Ibid._, 422. Bratton Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men, indicates
+this practice in his deposition in the _Greer_ vs. _Tharpe_ case.
+
+[16] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[17] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424.
+William King, in his deposition taken March 15, 1801, in _Huff_ vs.
+_Satcha_ [sic], in the Circuit Court of Lycoming County, notes the use
+of a company of militia, of which he was an officer, to eject a settler.
+Linn errs in his reference to the defendant as "Satcha." The man's name
+was Latcha, according to the Appearance Docket Commencing 1797, No. 2,
+Lycoming County.
+
+[18] _See_ nn. 6 and 7, p. 33.
+
+[19] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195. _See also_, pp. 31 and 32, this chapter, in
+which the excerpt from this source is quoted verbatim.
+
+[20] _Supra_, p. 33.
+
+[21] _Infra_, Chapter Six. The question of leadership in conjunction
+with the problems of this frontier is discussed in Chapter Six.
+
+[22] The Appearance Dockets and Files were checked for Northumberland
+County from 1784 to 1795 and for Lycoming County from 1795 to 1801.
+These records, obtained in the offices of the respective prothonotaries,
+produced thirty-seven cases in Northumberland and twenty-two in Lycoming
+County dealing with former Fair Play settlers. Unfortunately, only four
+were reviews of actual Fair Play decisions.
+
+[23] Northumberland County originated in 1772 and Lycoming County in
+1795. Clinton County was not created until 1839.
+
+[24] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (Philadelphia, 1857), p. 172.
+
+[25] The cases referred to here are: _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, _Huff_
+vs. _Satcha_, and _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_. They were located in the
+Appearance Dockets of Lycoming and Northumberland counties in the
+respective prothonotaries' offices. _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_ appears in
+the Northumberland County Docket for November, 1783, to August, 1786, in
+the February term of the Court of Common Pleas, file 42. Both the Huff
+and Grier cases were found in the Lycoming County Docket No. 2,
+commencing 1797, court terms and file numbers indicated as follows:
+_Huff_ vs. _Satcha_, February, 1799, #2, and _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_, May,
+1800, #41. A partial deposition by Eleanor Coldren, _Now and Then_, XII
+(1959), 220-222, was also employed. Although the case appears to be
+_Dewitt_ vs. _Dunn_, I could not locate it in the Appearance Dockets.
+Depositions taken in the Huff and Grier cases were published in Linn,
+"Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," pp. 422-424.
+
+[26] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 205.
+
+[27] Jasper Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I (Philadelphia, 1817),
+497-498.
+
+[28] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[29] Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I, 497-498.
+
+[30] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[31] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 422.
+
+[32] _Ibid._
+
+[33] _Ibid._
+
+[34] _Ibid._
+
+[35] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 469.
+
+[36] Now Linden, in Woodward Township, a few miles west of Williamsport.
+
+[37] King refers here to the Great Runaway of 1778.
+
+[38] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair-Play Settlers," p. 423-424.
+
+[39] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 470.
+
+[40] _Ibid._, p. 471.
+
+[41] D. S. Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_ (Lock Haven,
+1875), pp. 207-208. Maynard has reprinted here some excerpts from John
+Hamilton's "Early Times on the West Branch," which was published in the
+Lock Haven _Republican_ in 1875. Unfortunately, recurrent floods
+destroyed most of the newspaper files, and copies of this series are not
+now available. John Hamilton was a third-generation descendant of
+Alexander Hamilton, one of the original Fair Play settlers.
+
+[42] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), p. 193.
+
+[43] _Ibid._ An alleged copy of the declaration published in _A Picture
+of Clinton County_ (Lock Haven, 1942), p. 38, is clearly spurious. The
+language of this Pennsylvania Writers' project of the W.P.A. is
+obviously twentieth-century, and it contains references to events which
+had not yet occurred.
+
+[44] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 72.
+
+[45] Muncy Historical Society, Muncy, Pa., Wagner Collection, Anna
+Jackson Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions,
+Dec. 16, 1858.
+
+[46] _Ibid._, John Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of
+Pensions, May 27, 1859.
+
+[47] The veracity of the witness is an important question here.
+Meginness, in his 1857 edition, devotes a footnote, p. 168, to this
+remarkable woman who was in full possession of her faculties at the
+time. The Rev. John Grier, son-in-law of Mrs. Hamilton and brother of
+Supreme Court Justice Robert C. Grier, wrote to President Buchanan on
+Nov. 12, 1858, (Wagner Collection), stating that "Mrs. Hamilton is one
+of the most intelligent in our community." Buchanan then wrote an
+affidavit in support of Grier's statements to the Commissioner of
+Pensions, Nov. 27, 1858, (Wagner Collection). Aside from the
+declarations of Mrs. Hamilton and her son, the only other support, and
+this is hearsay, is found in the account of an alleged conversation
+between W. H. Sanderson and Robert Couvenhoven, the famed scout. W. H.
+Sanderson, _Historical Reminiscences_, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker (Altoona,
+1920), pp. 6-8. Here again, the fact that the reminiscences were not
+recorded until some seventy years after the "chats" raises serious
+doubts.
+
+[48] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Fourth Series, III, 545.
+
+[49] _Ibid._, p. 546.
+
+[50] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473.
+
+[51] _Ibid._
+
+[52] _Ibid._
+
+[53] _Ibid._
+
+[54] _Ibid._ _See also_ John H. Carter, "The Committee of Safety of
+Northumberland County," _The Northumberland County Historical Society
+Proceedings and Addresses_, XVIII (1950), 44-45.
+
+[55] _See_ map of the Fair Play territory in Chapter One.
+
+[56] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 469. _See also_,
+Carter, "The Committee of Safety," pp. 33-45, for a full account of the
+activities of the Committee. Carter notes that the county committee
+consisted of thirty-three members, three from each of the eleven
+townships chosen for a period of six months.
+
+[57] _Ibid._, pp. 472-474.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER FOUR
+
+_The Farmers' Frontier_
+
+
+The economy of the West Branch Valley was basically agrarian--a farmers'
+frontier. The "new order of Americanism"[1] which arose on this frontier
+was in part due to the cultural background of its inhabitants, the
+knowledge and traditional values which they had brought with them. It
+was further influenced by the frontier status of the region itself--an
+area of virgin land in the earliest stages of development. And finally,
+it was affected by the physical characteristics of the territory,
+particularly the mountains which separated these settlers from the more
+established settlements. It has been said that "many of the enduring
+characteristics of the American creed and the American national
+character originated in the way of life of the colonial farmer."[2] The
+Fair Play territory was typical of this development.
+
+The early pioneer, particularly if he was Scotch-Irish, generally came
+into the area from the Cumberland Valley, the "seed-plot and nursery" of
+the Scotch-Irish in America, the "original reservoir" of this leading
+frontier stock, via the Great Shamokin Path.[3] Since there were no
+roads, only Indian trails, the frontier traveler customarily followed
+the Indian paths which had been cleared along the rivers and streams.
+The Great Shamokin Path followed the Susquehanna from Shamokin (now
+Sunbury) to the West Branch, then out along the West Branch to the
+Allegheny Mountains.[4] Loading his wife and smaller children on a pack
+horse, his scanty possessions on another horse, the prospective settler
+drove a cow or two into the wild frontier at the rate of about twenty
+miles a day.[5] This meant that a trip of approximately two days brought
+him from Fort Augusta to the Fair Play country.
+
+Indian paths were the primary means of ingress and egress, although
+supplemented by the waterways which they paralleled. In addition to the
+Great Shamokin Path, there were paths up Lycoming Creek (the Sheshequin
+Path), and up Pine Creek, besides the path which followed Bald Eagle
+Creek down into the Juniata Valley. These trails and adjoining water
+routes were usually traveled on horseback or in canoes, depending upon
+the route to be followed. However, the rivers and streams were more
+often passages of departure than courses of entry.
+
+Established roads, that is authorized public constructions, were not to
+reach the West Branch region until 1775, although the Northumberland
+County Court ordered such construction and reported on it at the October
+term in 1772.[6] Appointments were made at the August session of 1775
+"to view, and if they saw cause, to lay out a bridle road from the mouth
+of Bald Eagle Creek to the town of Sunbury."[7] It was not until ten
+years later that extensions of this road were authorized, carrying it
+into the Nittany Valley and to Bald Eagle's Nest (near Milesburg, on the
+Indian path from the Great Island to Ohio).[8]
+
+Travel was usually on horseback or on foot. Canoes and flatboats, or
+simply rafts, were used on the rivers and creeks where available.
+Wagons, however, appeared after the construction of public roads and
+were seen in the Great Runaway of 1778.[9]
+
+The problem of communication between the frontier and the settled areas
+was a difficult one compounded by the natural geographic barriers and
+the fact that post and coach roads did not extend into this central
+Pennsylvania region. As a result the inhabitants had to depend upon
+occasional travelers, circuit riders, surveyors, and other Provincial
+authorities who visited them infrequently. Otherwise, the meetings of
+the Fair Play tribunal, irregular as they were, and the communications
+from the county Committee of Safety were about the only sources of
+information available. Of course, cabin-building, cornhusking, and
+quilting parties provided ample opportunities for the dissemination of
+strictly "local" news.
+
+Newspapers were not introduced into the upper Susquehanna Valley until
+around the turn of the century. The _Northumberland Gazette_ was
+published in Sunbury in 1797 or 1798.[10] The first truly West Branch
+paper was not circulated until 1802, when the _Lycoming Gazette_ was
+first published in Williamsport.[11] On the eve of the Revolution there
+were only seven newspapers available in the entire Province, none of
+which circulated as far north as the Fair Play territory.[12] As a
+matter of fact, there were only thirty-seven papers printed in all
+thirteen colonies at the beginning of the Revolution.[13]
+
+The Fair Play settler was an "outlaw," a squatter who came into this
+central Pennsylvania wilderness with his family and without the benefit
+of a land grant, and who literally hacked and carved out a living. The
+natural elements, the savage natives, and the wild life all resisted
+him; but he conquered them all, and the conquest gave him a feeling of
+accomplishment which enhanced his independent spirit.
+
+If the story of the Great Plains frontier can be told in terms of
+railroads, barbed-wire fences, windmills, and six-shooters,[14] then the
+cruder tale of the West Branch frontier can be told in terms of the
+rifle, the axe, and the plow. The rifle, first and foremost as the
+weapon of security, was the basic means of self-preservation in a wild
+land where survival was a constant question.[15] The axe, which Theodore
+Roosevelt later described as "a servant hardly standing second even to
+the rifle,"[16] was the main implement of destruction and construction.
+It was used for clearing the forest of the many trees which encroached
+upon the acreage which the settler had staked out for himself, and for
+cutting the logs which would provide the rude, one-room shelter the
+pioneer constructed for himself and his family. The crude wooden plow
+was the implement which made this frontiersman a farmer, although its
+effectiveness was extremely limited. However, the soil was so fertile,
+and the weeds so sparse, that scratching the earth and scattering seeds
+produced a crop.[17]
+
+A contemporary description of squatter settlements in Muncy Hills, some
+twenty-odd miles east of the Fair Play territory, but in the West Branch
+Valley, gives a vivid picture of the nature of these early
+establishments:
+
+    They came from no Body enquires where, or how, but generally with
+    Families, fix on any Spot in the Wood that pleases them. Cut down
+    some trees & make up a Log Hut in a Day, clear away the underweed &
+    girdle.... The Trees they have no use for if cut down after their
+    Hut is made. They dig up & harrow the Ground, plant Potatoes, a Crop
+    which they get out in three Months, sow Corn, etc., (& having sown
+    in peace by the Law of the Land they are secured in reaping in
+    peace) & continue at Work without ever enquiring whose the Land is,
+    until the Proprietor himself disturbs & drives them off with
+    Difficulty.[18]
+
+This experience was duplicated in the Fair Play territory where there
+were no immediate neighbors whose permission was necessary for
+settlement, or until a dispute was carried to the tribunal for
+adjudication. This procedure was detailed in the last chapter.
+
+Having selected a site, preferably on or near a stream, and obtained
+approval from the Fair Play men and his neighbors, the prospective
+settler was faced with the long and tedious work of clearing the land
+for his home and farm. This was an extended effort for he could clear
+only a few acres a year. In the meantime, his survival depended upon the
+few provisions he brought with him--some grain for meal, a little flour,
+and perhaps some salt pork and smoked meat. These supplies, combined
+with the wild game and fish which abounded in the area, served until
+such a time as crops could be produced. It was a rigorous life
+complicated by the fact that the meager supplies often ran out before
+the first crop was brought in. The first month's meals were too often
+variations on the limited fare of water porridge and hulled corn, as
+described by a later pioneer.[19]
+
+Homes in the Fair Play territory were built "to _live_ in, and not for
+_show_...."[20] The following description, by the grandson of one of the
+original settlers, illustrates the cooperative nature of the enterprise,
+in addition to giving a clear picture of the type of construction which
+replaced the early lean-to shelter with which the frontiersman was first
+acquainted:
+
+    Our buildings are made of hewn logs, on an average 24 feet long by
+    20 wide, sometimes a wall of stone, a foot or more above the level
+    of the earth, raised as a foundation; but in general, four large
+    stones are laid at the corners, and the building raised on _them_.
+    The house is covered sometimes with shingles, sometimes with
+    clapboards. [The latter required no laths, rafters, or nails, and
+    was put on in less time.] ... The ground logs being laid
+    saddle-shaped, on the upper edge, is cut in with an axe, at the
+    ends, as long as the logs are thick, then the end logs are raised
+    and a "notch" cut to fit the saddle. This is the only kind of tie or
+    binder they have; and when the building is raised as many rounds as
+    it is intended, the ribs are raised, on which a course of clapboards
+    is laid, butts resting on a "butting pole." A press pole is laid on
+    the clapboards immediately over the ribs to keep them from shifting
+    by the wind, and the pole is kept to its berth by stay blocks,
+    resting in the first course against the butting-pole. The logs are
+    run upon the building on skids by the help of wooden forks. The most
+    experienced "axe-man" are placed on the buildings as "cornermen;"
+    the rest of the company are on the ground to carry the logs and run
+    them up.[21]
+
+In this fashion, the frontier cabin was raised and covered in a single
+day, without a mason, without a pound of iron, and with nothing but dirt
+for flooring. The doors and windows were subsequently cut out of the
+structure to suit the tastes of its occupants.
+
+In this one-room cabin lived the frontier settler and his family, who
+might be joined by guests. Small wonder, then, that additions to this
+construction took on such significance that they were items of mention
+in later wills.[22]
+
+Once having cleared a reasonable portion of his property, raised his
+cabin, and scratched out an existence for his first few months of
+occupation, the pioneer was now ready to get down to the business of
+farming. Working around the stumps which cluttered his improvement, the
+frontier farmer planted his main crops, which were, of course, the food
+grains--wheat, rye, with oats, barley, and corn, and buckwheat and corn
+for the livestock. Some indication of the planting and harvesting
+seasons can be seen from this account:
+
+    I find Wheat is sown here in the Fall (beging. of Septr.) Clover &
+    timothy Grass is generally sown with it. The Wheat is cut in June or
+    beginning of July after which the Grass grows very rapidly & always
+    affords two Crops. Where Grass has not been sown they harrow the
+    Ground well where the Wheat is taken off & sow Buck Wheat which
+    ripens by the beginning & through September is excellent food for
+    Poultry & Cattle & makes good Cakes.[23]
+
+The amazing fertility of the soil, as noted by more than one journalist,
+eased the difficulties of the crude wooden implements which were the
+farmer's tools. Reference is made to "one [who] plowed the same spot ...
+for eight years ... [taking] double Crops without giving it an Ounce of
+Manure."[24] Scientific farming had not yet come to the West Branch
+Valley, although the Philadelphia area had been awakened to its
+possibilities through the publications of Franklin's American
+Philosophical Society.
+
+Fertile soil was practically essential when one considers the crude
+implements with which the frontier farmer carried on his hazardous
+vocation. In addition to the crude wooden plow, which we have already
+mentioned, the agrarian pioneer of the West Branch possessed a
+long-bladed sickle, a homemade rake, a homemade hay fork, and a grain
+shovel.[25] All of these items were made of wood and were of the crudest
+sort.[26] As time went on, he added a few tools of his own invention,
+but these, and his sturdy curved-handled axe, constituted the essential
+instruments of the farmer's craft.
+
+July was the month of harvest for the mainly "subsistence" farmers
+scattered along the West Branch. The uncertainties of the weather and
+the number of acres planted had some influence upon the harvesting, so
+that it was not unusual to see the wheat still swaying in the warm
+summer breezes in the last week of July. However, if possible, the grain
+was generally cut the first part of the month in order that buckwheat,
+or other fodder, might be sown and harvested in the fall.
+
+Harvesttime was a cooperative enterprise and whole families joined in
+"bringing in the sheaves." The grain had to be cut and raked into piles,
+and the piles bundled into shocks tied together with stalks of the grain
+itself. This took "hands" and the frontier family was generally the only
+labor force available. In time, however, field work was confined to the
+men of the family among the Scotch-Irish, who attached social
+significance to the type of work done by their women.
+
+Fithian's _Journal_ reveals, however, that class-consciousness was not
+yet apparent in the division of labor on this frontier. On two occasions
+he describes daughters of leading families engaged in other than
+household tasks. Arriving at the home of Squire Fleming, with whom he
+was to stay for a week, Fithian notes on July 25, 1775, that Betsey
+Fleming, his host's daughter, "was milking."[27] The very next day, upon
+visiting the Squire's brother, who had "two fine Daughter's," this
+Presbyterian journalist found "One of them reaping."[28] If Leyburn's
+comment that social status among the Scotch-Irish depended in part upon
+the work done by the women of the family, then these examples attest to
+the fact that "status" was a luxury which the Fair Play settlers could
+not yet afford.[29]
+
+Threshing was either done by hand with flails, or, if the family had a
+cow or two (and the tax lists indicate that they did), the grain was
+separated by driving the livestock around and around over the unbundled
+straw. Finally, the chaff was removed by throwing the grain into the air
+while the breeze was flowing. The grain was then collected and readied
+for milling.
+
+Gristmills were available in the West Branch Valley almost from the
+outset of settlement due to the many fine streams which flowed through
+the territory. As a result, few farmers had to travel more than five
+miles, generally on horseback, to carry their bags of grain to the mill.
+If the farmer had no horse, he had to carry his sack of grain on his
+shoulder. If the settler lived on or near a stream, he put his sacks of
+grain in a canoe and paddled downstream to the nearest mill. In the
+early days before the mills, the grain was pounded into meal by using a
+heavy pestle and a hollowed-out stump, a crude mortar which served the
+purpose.
+
+In time, the gristmill owners also operated distilleries, converting the
+pioneer's wheat, rye, and barley into spirited beverages which were
+freely imbibed along this and other frontiers. By the time of the
+Revolution, distilling was so common as to cause the Committee of Safety
+to take action to conserve the grain.[30] "Home brew," however, was
+quite the custom, and it was not long before most farmers operated their
+own stills.
+
+Self-sufficiency was both a characteristic and a necessity among these
+Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers of central Pennsylvania.
+Bringing their agrarian traditions with them from the "old country,"
+where they had operated small farms, they were bound to a "subsistence
+farming" existence by the inaccessibility of markets to the frontier.
+One diarist found this conducive to a "perfect Independence" which made
+a "Market to them, almost unnecessary."[31] This economic independence
+carried over into frontier manufacturing, if it can be called that,
+because the industry, except for the gristmills and their distilleries,
+was strictly domestic.
+
+It has often been said that the frontier farmer was a "jack-of-all
+trades," and the West Branch settler of the Fair Play territory was a
+typical example. With no market of skilled labor, or any other market
+for that matter,[32] he was his own carpenter, cooper, shoe-maker,
+tailor, and blacksmith. Whatever he wanted or needed had to be made in
+his own home. Thus, frontier industry was of the handicraft or domestic
+type, with tasks apportioned among the various members of the family in
+accordance with their sex and talent. It was truly a "complete little
+world" in which the pioneer family supplied its every demand by its own
+efforts.[33]
+
+Although the role of the women was to take on status significance as the
+frontier areas became more stable, in the earlier years of settlement
+their tasks were extensive and varied. Though they were busy with
+household duties such as churning butter, making soap, pouring candles,
+quilting, and weaving cloth for the family's clothing, it was not
+uncommon for the women to join the men in the field at harvesttime. The
+domesticity of the American housewife may be one impact on American life
+made by the Germans.[34]
+
+The children, too, were important persons in the economic life of the
+frontier family. Their labors lightened the load for both father and
+mother. With no available labor market from which to draw farm hands and
+household help, it was both necessary and useful to give the boys and
+girls a vocational apprenticeship in farming or homemaking. The girls'
+responsibilities were usually, although not exclusively, related to the
+hearth; the efforts of the boys were generally confined to the field and
+the implements employed there, although they did service too as
+household handymen, hauling wood, making fires, and the like.[35]
+
+In addition to their farming and domestic industry, the other economic
+activities of these agrarian pioneers included the care of their
+livestock and the exploitation of the available natural resources in
+their subsistence pattern of living. The tax lists for Northumberland
+County indicate the possession of two or three horses and a like number
+of cows for each head of a household.[36] There were also "various
+Breeds of Hogs" although they were not listed by the tax assessor.[37]
+Mr. Davy's comment that "Sheep are not well understood ... often
+destroyed by the Wolves ... few ... except [those] of good Capital keep
+them" may explain their absence from these same assessments.[38]
+
+Maple syrup provided the sugar supply, a fact noted by land speculators
+who touted this "Country Abounding in the Sugar Tree."[39] Anti-slave
+interests later thought that maple sugar would replace the
+slave-produced cane sugar.[40] Mr. Davy described the process as he
+observed it at Muncy:
+
+    The Maple Trees yield about 5 w of Sugar each on an average
+    annually, some give as much as 15 ws but these are rare. It is drawn
+    off in April & May by boring holes in the Tree into which Quills &
+    Canes are introduced to convey the Juice to a Trough placed round
+    the bottom of it. This juice is boiled down to Sugar & clarified
+    with very little trouble & is very good.[41]
+
+Honey also existed in great quantities in the area and was used
+extensively. Apparently the "sweet tooth" of the West Branch settlers
+was well satisfied by the ample resources for saccharine products.
+
+The trade and commerce of the West Branch Valley were strictly confined
+to its own locale. Mountain barriers, limited transportation facilities,
+and insufficient contact with the settled areas of the Province only
+served to heighten the essential self-sufficiency of the Fair Play
+settlers. The result was an economic independence which doubtless had
+its political manifestations.[42]
+
+Economic conditions have their political implications, but it was the
+total impact of the frontier and not simply the commercial restrictions
+of some outside authority which made the Fair Play settlers self-reliant
+and independent "subsistence" farmers. The farmers' frontier did not
+result from the impact of any particular national stock groups, for
+Scotch-Irish, English, and German settlers reacted similarly. As the
+most recent historian of the Scotch-Irish, the most numerical national
+stock on this frontier, suggests, "authentically democratic principles,
+when the Scotch-Irish exhibited them in America, were rather the result
+of their experiences on colonial frontiers than the product of the
+Scottish and Ulster heritage."[43] The farmers' frontier with its
+characteristics of individualistic self-reliance was a product of the
+frontier itself.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 18.
+
+[2] Henry Bamford Parkes, _The American Experience_ (New York, 1959), p.
+44.
+
+[3] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 59.
+
+[4] Paul A. W. Wallace, _Indian Paths of Pennsylvania_ (Harrisburg,
+1965), pp. 66-72, includes two maps.
+
+[5] Chester D. Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," _The
+Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_, VII
+(1935), 18.
+
+[6] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 400.
+
+[7] _Ibid._, p. 401.
+
+[8] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[9] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 401.
+
+[10] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), p. 454.
+
+[11] _Ibid._, p. 458
+
+[12] Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, _Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia
+in the Age of Franklin_ (New York, 1962), p. 76.
+
+[13] Barck and Lefler, _Colonial America_, p. 409.
+
+[14] Walter Prescott Webb, _The Great Plains_ (New York, 1931), pp.
+238-244.
+
+[15] Herbert H. Beck, "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania
+Rifle," _Papers Read Before The Lancaster County Historical Society_,
+LIII (1949), 33-61.
+
+[16] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 19.
+
+[17] Lewis E. Theiss, "Early Agriculture," _Susquehanna Tales_ (Sunbury,
+1955), p. 89.
+
+[18] Norman B. Wilkinson (ed.), "Mr. Davy's Diary," _Pennsylvania
+History_, XX (1953), 261.
+
+[19] James W. Silver (ed.), "Chauncey Brockway, an Autobiographical
+Sketch," _Pennsylvania History_, XXV (1958), 143.
+
+[20] Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_, p. 11.
+
+[21] _Ibid._
+
+[22] The probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties, found
+in the respective offices of the Register of Wills and Recorder of
+Deeds, contain entries leaving to the widow the "best room in the
+house," or, "her choice of rooms." No doubt, the simplicity of the
+earlier home accentuated the value of the additions.
+
+[23] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.
+
+[24] _Ibid._, p. 341. The Reverend Philip Vickers Fithian notes the
+richness of the land in the journal of his one-week visit to the area in
+the summer of 1775. He was also surprised to find that "many have their
+Grain yet in the Field," a notation for the 26th of July. _Fithian:
+Journal_, p. 71.
+
+[25] Theiss, _Susquehanna Tales_, p. 88.
+
+[26] The Museum of the Muncy Historical Society contains examples of
+these early farm implements and offers vivid evidence of their
+crudeness.
+
+[27] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 71.
+
+[28] _Ibid._, p. 72.
+
+[29] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262.
+
+[30] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 469.
+
+[31] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 258.
+
+[32] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 171. Even
+in the more settled areas of the Susquehanna Valley markets were slow to
+develop as this note from "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 338, reported on Oct.
+3, 1794: "At present there is no Market here but if many English
+Families settle this will soon follow as there is an excellent supply of
+every necessary & even Luxury in the Neighbourhood."
+
+[33] J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1940), p. 74.
+
+[34] Arthur W. Calhoun, _A Social History of the American Family_ (New
+York, 1960), I, 202.
+
+[35] Wright and Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western Pennsylvania_, pp.
+86-92.
+
+[36] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 405-805.
+
+[37] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 265.
+
+[38] _Ibid._
+
+[39] _Ibid._, pp. 263-264.
+
+[40] _Ibid._, p. 264.
+
+[41] _Ibid._, p. 263.
+
+[42] One student of the commerce of the Susquehanna Valley made sweeping
+generalizations about its significance which can hardly be
+substantiated. _See_ Morris K. Turner, _The Commercial Relations of the
+Susquehanna Valley During the Colonial Period_ (Ph.D. Thesis, University
+of Pennsylvania, 1916). This dissertation, although claiming to deal
+with the Susquehanna Valley, never gets much beyond Harrisburg and
+seldom reaches as far north as Fort Augusta. Its accounts of roads,
+navigation improvements, and trade fail to reach the Fair Play settlers.
+This lends further support to their independent and self-sufficient
+existence. Turner's concluding paragraph is, however, a gem of economic
+determinism and bears repeating in full. Found on page 100, it reads as
+follows:
+
+"If then, the commercial relations of the Susquehanna Valley were so far
+reaching affecting as they did in the pre-Revolutionary period the
+attitude of the people on all the questions, practically, of the day it
+is only fair to say that it was these relations which promoted the
+Revolution in the Province and drove the old government out of
+existence. The political issues were aided and abetted, yes, were
+created, were born from the womb of the neglected commercial relations
+of the Province and no other section at the time had such extensive
+relations as the Susquehanna Valley. No other conclusion can be reached
+after a serious study of the history of the period."
+
+[43] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 150.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER FIVE
+
+_Fair Play Society_
+
+
+The society of the Fair Play territory, between the year 1769 and 1784,
+was indeed simple. There were no towns or population clusters, either in
+the territory or within a range of some thirty-five or forty miles.
+Furthermore, as we have already noted, transportation and communication
+facilities were so limited as to make contact with the "outside world"
+an exception rather than the rule. As we have also seen, economic
+functions on this farmers' frontier were not highly specialized. Even
+the political system, with its tribunal of Fair Play men, operated
+without the benefit of any formal code.
+
+But it would be easy, from these indications, to magnify the simplicity
+of the social structure and of social relationships in the West Branch
+Valley. If we are to consider the development of democracy on this
+frontier, we must take into account the various national stock groups
+who settled this area and, in so doing, weigh their relative economic
+and social status, the amount of intermarriage between them, and the
+ease and frequency with which they visited each other. These and other
+social relationships, such as their joint participation in voluntary
+associations, their prejudices and conflicts, and the assimilation of
+alien groups, must all be evaluated. The leadership, the existence of
+social classes, and the family patterns must, of necessity, be a part of
+our inquiry. And finally, the religious institutions, the educational
+and cultural opportunities, and the system of values have to be
+considered in arriving at a judgment regarding the democratic nature of
+Fair Play society.
+
+Fair Play society was composed of Scotch-Irish (48.75 per cent), English
+(20 per cent), German (15 per cent), Scots (6.25 per cent), Irish (5 per
+cent), Welsh (2.5 per cent) and French (2.5 per cent) settlers.[1] Due
+to the pioneering conditions under which all of these national stock
+groups developed their "improvements," economic privilege was rather
+difficult to attain. Furthermore, even after the legislature granted
+pre-emption in the act of December, 1784, the grants were limited to
+300 acres.[2] In consequence of this, massive holdings were impossible
+to maintain legally, as the customary holdings of two to three hundred
+acres indicate in the tax lists for the years after 1784.[3] In fact,
+the tax lists suggest that absentee-owners or persons outside the actual
+geographic limits of the Fair Play territory who participated with the
+Fair Play settlers were the only ones to possess 700 to 1,000 acres or
+more.[4] This fact, combined with the "subsistence farming" which all of
+the area settlers pursued, suggests a relatively comparable economic
+status for the members of the Fair Play society. Consequently, social
+status was not necessarily dependent upon economic status.
+
+Social status on this frontier depended more upon achieved status than
+ascribed status. This may have been an influence of the Scotch-Irish,
+who judged, and thus classified, a neighbor by the size and condition of
+his dwelling, the care of his farm, the work done by the women in the
+family, his personal characteristics and morality, and his
+diversions.[5] Journalists, pension claimants, and the operative,
+although unwritten, code of the Fair Play men all give corroborative
+evidence in this regard.[6] Of all these criteria, personal character
+and morality seemed to have been most important. The Scotch-Irish, who,
+like the people of other national stocks, accepted social classes as the
+right ordering of society, shifted their emphasis, as a result of the
+frontier experience, from family heritage to individual achievement.[7]
+
+Intermarriages provide a further key to the social relationships of the
+Fair Play settlers. If a small sample is any indication, the cases of
+intermarriages among the various national stock groups were relatively
+high, with better than one-third of the marriages sampled falling within
+this classification.[8] The fact that the Scotch-Irish frequently
+married within their own group was probably due to their being more
+"available" in terms of numbers. Industry and good character were the
+prime criteria for selecting a frontier mate, as Dunaway points out.[9]
+
+The ease and frequency of neighborly visits is vividly demonstrated in
+the characteristically cooperative cabin-raisings, barn-raisings,
+cornhuskings and similar activities in which joint effort was usual. The
+women, too, exchanged visits and, on occasion, gathered at one place for
+quilting or other mutually shared activities.[10] Furthermore, the
+frontier journalists often noted the fine hospitality and congeniality
+of their backwoods hosts.[11]
+
+Further evidence of the egalitarian influence of this frontier is found
+in the joint participation of Fair Play settlers in voluntary
+associations.[12] This is particularly noticeable in their attendance
+at outdoor sermons and involvement in the various political activities.
+At a time when fewer than 100 families lived in the territory, Fithian
+observed that "There were present about an Hundred & forty" people for a
+sermon which he gave on the banks of the Susquehanna, opposite the
+present city of Lock Haven, on Sunday, July 30, 1775.[13] Although
+William Colbert, a Methodist, later "preached to a large congregation of
+willing hearers" within the territory, he did not think that it was
+"worth the preachers while to stop here."[14] This may have been due to
+the fact that they were mainly Presbyterians. Colbert's reception was
+apparently fair for he makes a point of saying, "I know not that there
+is a prejudiced person among them."[15] No regular church was
+established in this region until 1792, so it appears that the settlers
+generally participated in group religious activities regardless of the
+denominational affiliation of the preacher conducting the services.
+However, as we will point out later, this is not to suggest that there
+was no friction between denominations.
+
+The political activities of the Fair Play settlers demonstrate the mass
+participation, at least of the adult males, in this type of voluntary
+association. The annual elections of the Fair Play men were conducted
+without discrimination against any of the settlers by reason of
+religion, national origin, or property. In addition, the decisions of
+the tribunal were carried out, as Smith reports, "by the whole body, who
+started up in mass, at the mandate of the court."[16] Special occasions,
+such as the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence, were also marked by
+the participation _en masse_ of these West Branch pioneers. Mrs.
+Hamilton, in her widow's pension application, speaks of "seeing such
+numbers flocking there" (along the banks of Pine Creek in July of
+1776).[17] Apparently, as Mrs. Hamilton says, most of the settlers "had
+a knolege of what was doing," particularly with regard to political
+affairs.[18]
+
+These evidences of group participation in religious and political
+activities should not mislead one into thinking that conflict, legal or
+otherwise, was alien to the West Branch frontiersmen. The cases brought
+before the Fair Play "court" and the friction between Methodists and
+Presbyterians affirm this strife. The first settler in the territory,
+Cleary Campbell, was an almost constant litigant, both as plaintiff and
+defendant, in the Northumberland County Court from the time of his
+arrival in 1769.[19] His name, along with the names of other Fair Play
+settlers, appeared regularly on the Appearance Dockets of the
+Northumberland and Lycoming County courts. The cases usually involved
+land titles and personal obligations or debts.
+
+The religious conflict is clearly seen in the journal of the Reverend
+William Colbert. An incident which occurred about twenty miles south of
+the West Branch illustrates this friction:
+
+    This is a town [present-day Milton] with three stores, three
+    taverns, two ball allies. Agreeable to its size it appears to be one
+    of the most dissipated places I ever saw. I could not tell how to
+    pass them--I inquired at one of the ball allies if preaching was
+    expected--A religious old Presbyterian standing by where they were
+    playing answered that he did not know. I then asked them that were
+    playing ball, they answered no. I farther asked them if they did not
+    think they would be better employed hearing preaching than playing
+    ball. Their answer was a laugh, that there was time for all things
+    and that they went to preachings on Sundays. I told them they would
+    not be willing to go to judgment from that exercise--they said they
+    ventured that. So after a little conversation with the old man I
+    left them ripening for destruction....[20]
+
+Colbert's journal is filled with snide remarks and caustic comments
+about Presbyterians in general and Calvinist doctrines in
+particular.[21] He was especially concerned for the "lost souls" of the
+Presbyterians of the West Branch Valley. A twentieth-century theologian
+suggests that Presbyterian dogmatism had driven the Scotch-Irish to the
+frontier; this same problem complicated their social relationships in
+the backwoods country.[22]
+
+The process of acculturation of the frontier was marked by the impact of
+the aborigines upon the new white settlers in terms of the developing
+style of life in the West Branch Valley. In fact, the culture of the
+Indian may have affected the white settlers more than theirs affected
+that of the Indian. For instance, Mr. Davy says that "the Dress &
+manners of the People more nearly assimilate to those of the Indians
+than lower down, but the purest English Language is universally
+spoken."[23]
+
+The West Branch Valley was a new world whose experiences made new men,
+rather than a transplanted old world with its emphasis on heritage and
+tradition.[24] However, the English language and Scots Presbyterianism
+were basic ingredients in the melting pot of this and other frontiers
+where the American character emerged.
+
+The social class structure of Fair Play society is rather difficult to
+assess. Extensive land holdings and material possessions were not
+characteristic of these "squatter" settlements. Consequently, property
+was not the distinguishing factor in stratifying the social levels of
+the Fair Play community. Furthermore, there was no slave population or
+indentured servant class to be confined to the lowest rung of the social
+ladder. Here, each man either owned his "improvement" or operated under
+some condition of tenancy. However, both indentured servitude and Negro
+slavery existed in the "New Purchase" of 1768 in nearby Muncy.[25] Thus,
+it was a two-class pattern, in the main, which constituted the Fair Play
+society--landholders and tenants. In addition, though, there was a
+further delineation within the landholding class on the basis of
+character and morality. This characteristically Scotch-Irish
+differentiation may have been due to the predominance of the Ulsterites
+in the West Branch population.[26] In consideration of this fact, a
+three-class structure, consisting of an elite, other landholders, and
+tenants, would best describe the social class system of the Fair Play
+territory.
+
+The elite of the Fair Play society were generally the political and
+economic leaders as well. They owned the "forts," operated the
+gristmills, and held the prominent political positions in the vicinity.
+Surprisingly enough, though, they frequently resided on the fringe areas
+of the territory and were thus able to acquire more land.[27] A fuller
+description of this elite and its leadership is given in the next
+chapter.
+
+The frontier family was undoubtedly the key social institution in
+transmitting this new "American" culture to subsequent generations.
+Regardless of national origin, the families were closely-knit,
+well-disciplined units, whose members formed rather complete social and
+economic entities. As we have already noted, the agrarian family had its
+own division of labor, with each member carrying out his assigned tasks
+and, at the same time, learning the practices and procedures of the
+farmers' frontier. It was also the cultural and educational core, in
+which its members learned their faith, received their education, and
+acquired the values which would serve them throughout their lives.
+Family loyalty was a marked characteristic on the frontier and,
+incidentally, among the Scotch-Irish. The woman's lot was severe but she
+accepted it with a submissiveness which can still be seen in some
+backcountry areas of Pennsylvania today.[28] Clannish and dependent upon
+each other, the frontier family had no use for divorce, which was
+practically unknown.[29] If the patterns and values of these frontier
+families tended to approximate those of the Scotch-Irish in particular,
+and they did, it was because the Scotch-Irish were representative rather
+than unique.[30]
+
+The church was probably the second most important social institution in
+developing a system of values and a "style of life" in the Fair Play
+territory. Here again, the Scotch-Irish with their Presbyterianism
+provided the most significant influence, and ultimately the first
+regular church--although Methodists, such as Colbert, found little to
+favor in Calvinism. Almost without exception, the wills probated in the
+courts of Northumberland and Lycoming counties between 1772 and 1830
+asked for burial "in a decent and Christian like manner," and committed
+the departed soul to "the Creator." A Christian life and a Christian
+burial were valued in this frontier society.
+
+Due to the absence of regular churches, religious instruction was
+primarily carried on by mothers "abel to instruct," as Mrs. Hamilton put
+it.[31] Prayer, the reading of the Bible, and a rudimentary catechism
+were all a part of this home worship, conducted by one or both parents.
+Baptism and other sacraments of the church were provided by itinerant
+pastors who made their "rounds" through the valley. Presbyterians and,
+later, Methodists developed the practice of gathering together in their
+cabins in "praying societies."[32] Originally consisting of neighbor
+groups, these societies, in time, took in areas consisting of several
+miles.[33]
+
+Itinerant pastors began to include the Fair Play territory in their
+travels in the decade of the 1770's. Philip Vickers Fithian learned from
+his host, Squire Fleming, that he was the first "orderly" preacher in
+the area.[34] Fithian's visit came about after he obtained an honorable
+dismissal from the first Philadelphia Presbytery--as no vacancies
+existed--in order to preach outside its bounds.[35] Although in the
+territory for only one week in the summer of 1775, Fithian's account of
+his Sunday sermon on the banks of the Susquehanna clearly describes the
+nature of wilderness preaching:
+
+    At eleven I began Service. We crossed over to the Indian Land, &
+    held Worship on the Bank of the River, opposite to the Great Island,
+    about a Mile & a half below 'Squire Fleming's. There were present
+    about an Hundred & forty; I stood at the Root of a great Tree, & the
+    People sitting in the Bushes, & green Grass round me.
+
+    They gave great Attention. I had the Eyes of all upon me. I spoke
+    with some Force, & pretty loud. I recommended to them earnestly the
+    religious Observation of God's Sabbaths, in this remote Place, where
+    they seldom have the Gospel preached--that they should attend with
+    Carefulness & Reverence upon it when it is among them--And that they
+    ought to strive to have it established here.[36]
+
+Fithian's recommendation was not carried out until 1792, when the Pine
+Creek Church was organized under the historic "independence" elm with
+Robert Love and a Mr. Culbertson as the first elders.[37] This church,
+along with the Lycoming Church, which was formed in the eastern part of
+the former Fair Play territory in October of that same year, was served
+by the Reverend Isaac Grier, who was called to serve Lycoming Creek,
+Pine Creek, and the Great Island, and ordained and installed by the
+Carlisle Presbytery, April 9, 1794.[38] He thus became the first
+regularly installed pastor in what had been the Fair Play territory.
+
+It was not until 1811 that the Presbyterian General Assembly organized
+the Northumberland Presbytery, which serves West Branch Valley
+Presbyterians to this day. In the days of the Fair Play system the area
+was assigned to Donegal Presbytery, although in 1786 the Carlisle
+Presbytery was formed out of the western part of Donegal.[39]
+
+Missionary efforts of Presbyterians in the Fair Play territory go all
+the way back to September of 1746, when the Reverend David Brainerd
+preached to the Indians of the Great Island.[40] But from that time
+until the opening of the West Branch Valley to settlement, following the
+first treaty at Fort Stanwix, nothing concerning the area appears on
+presbytery records. However, after the treaty one Presbyterian minister,
+the Reverend Francis Alison, pastor of the First Presbyterian Church of
+Philadelphia and vice-provost of the College of Philadelphia, applied
+for land above the mouth of Bald Eagle Creek and was granted some 1,500
+acres.[41] Alison never came into the region and, in fact, sold his
+entire purchase to John Fleming in 1773.[42]
+
+Although Fithian was the first "orderly" preacher assigned to the West
+Branch, the Donegal Presbytery had received an application from "setlers
+upon the W. Branch of Susquehannah" for ministerial supplies (pastors)
+in the middle of April, 1772.[43] Apparently these supplies never
+reached north of present-day Lewisburg.
+
+Presbyterianism, then, was the most significant religious influence in
+the Fair Play territory. Methodists and Baptists penetrated the region
+after the Revolution, but that penetration, although marked by some
+conflict, was not vital to the development of a system of values on this
+frontier during the period under study.[44] Furthermore, it was not
+until well into the nineteenth century that other Protestant sects
+established churches in the West Branch Valley.
+
+The extent of that influence and the nature of this frontier faith were
+central to the development of Fair Play society. Since there were no
+organized churches in the area, the family was the key agency of
+religious instruction and service. This fact, combined with the impact
+of the Great Awakening, led to the freeing of the individual from the
+communal covenant, resulting in a secularization of religion which
+culminated in a kind of "predestined freedom."[45] Consequently, the
+political implications of American Presbyterianism, which had the
+largest church membership in colonial Pennsylvania and the strongest
+affiliation on this frontier, were demonstrated in the democratic
+radicalism which the frontier spawned. Political maturity, that is to
+say, independence, was a logical evolution from religious
+emancipation.[46]
+
+In addition to the political implications of Presbyterianism, respect
+for education was a significant factor in the value structure of this
+frontier. The probate records of this period are filled with examples of
+the great desire to see the "children schooled," and specific
+educational instructions were often included in the wills.[47] The
+Presbyterian emphasis upon an educated ministry suggests that this
+reverence for education may also have been an education for reverence.
+Morality, education, and political equality and freedom--these were the
+basic tenets of this frontier faith.
+
+Despite the high value placed upon education, the educational and
+cultural opportunities on this frontier, as on others, were extremely
+limited. Aside from home instruction and the occasional visit of an
+itinerant pastor, formal education was a luxury which these pioneers
+could not yet afford. However, earlier historians of the West Branch
+refer to the existence of a "log school" at "Sour's ferry" in 1774.[48]
+Instruction in the "three R's," enforced with strict discipline, was
+given here a few months out of the year. A Presbyterian preacher who
+came into the region and stayed was the first teacher. Educational
+opportunity was extremely limited but education was highly respected.
+
+Books, too, were a luxury in the West Branch Valley. Although some of
+the wills of Fair Play settlers indicate the importance of books by
+mentioning them specifically, there was no common library from which the
+settlers could draw. However, Fithian's _Journal_ contains a note that
+he "reviewed the 'Squires Library"; so we do know of at least one
+library in the territory. Its accessibility for most of these pioneers
+is, of course, another question.
+
+Frontier art was mainly functional. Its objects were generally the
+furniture, the tools and weapons, and the implements of the household.
+Individual expressions of creative talent, these items, whether they
+were designs on the rifle stock or styles of tableware, were outlets of
+artistic demonstration. Probably the most prized and picturesque of the
+frontier folk arts was the making of patchwork quilts.[49] Although we
+have found no "Fair Play" pattern, we do know that the women of every
+frontier household sewed, and, because of the demand for bed quilts,
+every scrap was saved for the quilt-making. Colbert's _Journal_ tells of
+his dining at one Richard Manning's "with a number of women who were
+quilting."[50] Quilting parties were social events in the lives of these
+frontier women, and their _objets d'art_ were fully discussed from
+patterns and designs down to the intricate techniques of needlecraft.
+Perhaps the patchwork quilt is the enduring legacy of frontier folk art.
+
+The music of the frontier was primarily vocal--the singing of hymns and,
+possibly, folk songs. Instrumental music was confined to the fiddle,
+which one Fair Play settler felt valuable enough to mention in his
+will.[51] The fiddle also provided the musical background for the
+rollicking reels and jigs which the Scotch-Irish enjoyed so much.[52]
+That it was a hard life is certainly true, but it had its happy moments
+and music was the source of much of that happiness.
+
+Medical practices throughout the frontier were primitive, to say the
+least, and the West Branch Valley was no exception. A diary of a
+minister in the Susquehanna Valley around Lancaster provides specific
+examples of the purges, blood-letting, and herb concoctions which the
+frontier settler endured in order to survive.[53] In spite of the
+liberal use of spirited stimulants, ailing frontiersmen often suffered
+violent reactions both from their illnesses and their cures.
+
+Although the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley doubtless had
+their own mythology and folklore, most of it was passed on by word of
+mouth; as a result, little of record remains. The Revolutionary pension
+claims are filled with tales of the courage and patriotism of the
+stouthearted men and women of this frontier. A frequent claim is that
+the measures taken to defend Fort Augusta, after the Great Runaway,
+urged by Fair Play settlers who had fled to that point, saved the
+frontier and made independence a reality.
+
+Perhaps the best-known story is that of the "independence elm" on Pine
+Creek. However, as a recent writer suggests, the story of the "Pine
+Creek Declaration" may refer merely to the reading of a copy of the
+national declaration rather than to a separate document drawn up by the
+inhabitants of this frontier.[54] Mrs. Hamilton's testimony to the event
+notwithstanding, no copy of the declaration has ever been found.
+
+Another tale concerns the frequent reference to the upper Pine Creek
+area as "Beulah Land."[55] It seems that a circuit rider singing hymns
+approached a camp up Pine Creek in the Black Forest. Later, asked to
+sing, he offered the familiar "Beulah Land." Still later, he met with an
+accident between Blackwell and Cammal resulting in his death. The
+entertained were his mourners. Subsequently, they kept his name alive by
+singing the old hymn to such an extent that the name "Beulah Land"
+became attached to this region on Pine Creek.
+
+Frontier life afforded little leisure time so that recreation was
+generally economically oriented or related to some household task. In
+addition, wrestling, foot-racing, jumping, throwing the tomahawk, and
+shooting at marks were popular sports.[56] But drinking was probably the
+most common frontier recreation. It has been said that the Scotch-Irish
+made more whiskey and drank more of it than any other group.[57]
+Everyone drank it, even the ministers. In fact, the tavern preceded the
+church as a social center in the West Branch Valley.[58] Moderation,
+however, was the rule; excessive drinking was frowned upon.[59]
+
+The value system of Fair Play society can be analyzed in terms of the
+expressed ideals and beliefs, the conduct, and the material possessions
+of the pioneers who settled along the West Branch during this period.
+Journalists, diarists, and pension claimants offer recorded evidence of
+the ideals and beliefs of these settlers. Their actual behavior gives us
+some understanding of conduct as value. And finally, the probate records
+of the Northumberland and Lycoming County courts contribute some
+documentation concerning the material values of these frontier
+inhabitants. The result was a society dedicated to the idea of progress
+and oriented to a future of political and social equality and economic
+opportunity.
+
+A firm conviction concerning the right of property, that is, the right
+of individual private ownership, was developed early in the American
+experience in Virginia and Massachusetts and was reinforced by the
+experience of successive frontiers, of which the Fair Play territory was
+one. This is noted particularly in the pride in individual
+"improvements" and the vigorous assertion of property rights before the
+Fair Play tribunal and, later, in the regular courts. The large
+Scotch-Irish population on this and other frontiers characteristically
+asserted this view. Motivated by a spirit of individualism and the
+desire for a better way of life, the Fair Play settlers found land
+ownership basic to the accomplishment of their desired ends.[60]
+
+In conjunction with the policy of private land ownership, the support of
+squatters' rights tended to emphasize the equality of achievement rather
+than that of ascription. No man's position was ascribed in the Fair
+Play territory--he had to earn it. However, as we noted earlier, the
+pioneer farmer had to obtain the approval of his neighbors in order to
+settle in the area; but no evidence exists to show that this approval
+was in any way dependent upon social class or national origin.
+Furthermore, the annual election of the Fair Play men by the settlers,
+along with their rotation in office, gave a fair measure of political
+equality, which was reflected in the decisions of the tribunal affecting
+land claims.
+
+The hospitality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly stressed by
+the journalists who traveled in the West Branch Valley.[61] Despite the
+limitations of rooms and furnishings, the frontier cabin was ever open
+to the weary traveler, and spirited conversation and beverages were
+always available to revive him. Good food and fine friends could be
+found on the frontier. The frontiersman took great pride in his
+hospitality. Dependent upon outside travelers for news, the latest
+remedies for ailments, and mail, the inhabitants of the frontier opened
+the doors of their cabins and their hearts to visitors. Taken into a
+home, the weary traveler often found himself treated to the best in food
+and comfort which the limitations of the frontier permitted. Generally
+sharing the one-room cabin, like any member of the family, he soon
+learned that he was a welcome guest rather than a stranger in their
+midst. The loneliness of the frontier stimulated the hospitality of the
+frontiersman.
+
+Although no "frontier philosophy," as such, existed, the conduct of its
+inhabitants demonstrated their faith, their patriotism, their spirit of
+mutual helpfulness, and their temperance. The pioneer was not a
+philosopher or a thinker, because the rigorous struggle for survival,
+which was his, did not permit the leisure to develop these traits. He
+was a doer whose values and beliefs were reflected in his behavior.
+
+The favorable, but not always eager, reception of itinerant pastors, the
+religious instruction which took place in the home, and the frequent
+references to "the Creator" in the wills testify to the relevance of
+faith in influencing the character and behavior of these early
+Americans. Faith was not only relevant but also a matter of choice, and
+freedom of worship was practiced on this frontier. Here again, the
+Scotch-Irish Presbyterian influence may have been significant.[62]
+
+Patriotism, with few exceptions, was characteristic of the frontier. But
+loyalty to what? On this frontier it seems to have meant devotion to an
+America which developed through New World experience. Like Topsy, "it
+jus' growed," and no frontiersman wanted it taken away. The enthusiastic
+reception of the Declaration of Independence by the Fair Play settlers
+combined with the legend of their own resolutions on the question
+indicate this patriotic feeling. Despite their political differences
+with the settled areas, the West Branch pioneers were overwhelmingly
+loyal to the patriot cause in the American Revolution.[63] Their
+loyalty, however, was more to the ideal of freedom, or "liberty" as they
+termed it, than to any organization or state. They believed in and
+supported the liberty which their own hard work and the circumstances of
+the frontier had made possible.
+
+Mutual helpfulness was essential to survival in the wilderness and
+valued among its pioneers. Cabin-raisings, cornhuskings, harvesttime,
+and quilting parties are just a few examples of this spirit in action.
+Individualistic in his approach, the frontier farmer realized the need
+for neighborly support and appreciated its offer.
+
+In spite of the availability of a more-than-adequate supply of spirited
+liquid refreshment, temperance was both commended and respected on this
+Pennsylvania frontier. One historian points out that there was probably
+less drunkenness on the frontier than there was in eastern Pennsylvania,
+where it was not unusual for young men to get drunk at the taverns or to
+drink themselves under the table at weddings or at other social
+functions.[64] Drunkards were few and generally despised on the
+frontier.[65]
+
+Material values, in a society where possessions, beyond the land itself
+and the rude cabin built upon it, are limited, are best gleaned from the
+probate records, which listed the prized possessions of this frontier
+community. Beds and bedsteads are the items which appear most frequently
+in the wills of the Fair Play settlers. Occasionally, the ultimate in
+frontier affluence is reached in the form of a "feather Bed."[66] Beds,
+or feather beds, and bedsteads were so highly valued as pieces of
+furniture that they were often passed on to the daughters, serving as a
+substantial part of their dowries.[67] Surprisingly enough, the widow
+often received "the room she now sleeps in" or, "her choise of any one
+room in the house." This is not so amazing, however, when one realizes
+that additional rooms beyond the original one-room cabin quite logically
+became highly valued. Pewterware was the silver of the frontier, and, if
+the probate records are any indication, there was little of it and no
+silver. Aside from references to furniture such as spinning wheels,
+bureaus, tables, and chairs, and these not too regularly, it is quite
+evident that material possessions were few.
+
+What then was the nature of Fair Play society? The frontier, by its very
+nature, had an egalitarian influence which is readily apparent from this
+analysis of the "style of life" along the West Branch. A relative
+political and social equality existed in this land of economic
+opportunity where faith, patriotism, helpfulness, and self-determination
+were the outstanding traits. The frontier brought the democratizing role
+of achievement to the fore in American life, and the Fair Play settlers
+were an excellent example.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] _See_ Chart 1 in Chapter Two.
+
+[2] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[3] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 557-805.
+
+[4] For example, in the County Assessments for 1781, _Pennsylvania
+Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 468, 484, the individual holdings of
+resident property owners range from 50 to 1,500 acres, whereas
+non-residents' range from 200 to 13,000. Only six of thirty residents
+showed property in excess of 325 acres and four of these had 550 acres
+or less. The two large landowners were peripheral Fair Play residents.
+Subsequent tax lists indicate that non-residents eventually sold their
+property in sections.
+
+[5] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262.
+
+[6] _Fithian: Journal_ (1775) and _Journal of William Colbert_
+(1792-1794). These journals of the first regularly assigned itinerant
+pastors, Presbyterian and Methodist, to the West Branch Valley, contain
+numerous references concerning the personal character and morality of
+the settlers. In the Hamilton Papers of the Wagner Collection of
+Revolutionary War pension claimants, p. 11, Mrs. Hamilton writes to the
+Honorable George C. Whiting, Commissioner of Pensions, on Dec. 16, 1858:
+"I believe they were people of clear sound mind, just, upright, morrall,
+religious, and friendly to all. I should say they came nearest to
+keeping the commandment, love your nabour as yourself, then any people I
+ever lived among."
+
+[7] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 269.
+
+[8] Helen Herritt Russell, "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men
+and Their Government," _The Northumberland County Historical Society
+Proceedings and Addresses_, XXII (1958), 16-43. Mrs. Russell, whose
+genealogical studies were the basis of Chart 1 in Chapter Two, notes 24
+marriages among the 80 names, 9 of which were intermarriages of
+different national stocks. Of the 24 marriages, 9 were between
+Scotch-Irish couples. Intermarriages produced 5 English-Scotch-Irish
+couples, 2 German-Scotch-Irish, 1 Welsh-Scotch-Irish, and 1
+German-English. The intermarriages appear to follow the national stock
+percentages in the population. This would suggest that the
+intermarriages were a matter of choice rather than of necessity.
+
+[9] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 198.
+
+[10] _Journal of William Colbert_ (1792-1794). This entry for Thursday,
+Sept. 5, 1793, is from a typescript belonging to Dr. Charles F.
+Berkheimer, of Williamsport. The original is in Chicago at the Garrett
+Biblical Seminary.
+
+[11] Here again, Fithian, Colbert, and Mr. Davy all mention the friendly
+reception which was theirs on this frontier. Davy, in an entry for Oct.
+10, 1794, p. 265, says, "In the Winter Sleighs are in general use on the
+Rivers & on Land & it is time of Visiting & Jollity throughout the
+Country."
+
+[12] _Journal of William Colbert_, Tuesday, Aug. 21, 1792. Here the
+Reverend Colbert refers to the existence of a class in religion among
+the group of Presbyterians, although the prospects appear none too
+favorable. In fact, he says, "I had no desire to meet the class, so
+disordered are they, therefore omitted it." Quarterly meetings of
+Methodists were also held in the West Branch Valley, as Colbert notes in
+his journal for Saturday, Sept. 15, 1792, and Saturday, Sept. 7, 1793.
+In 1792, Colbert remarks that "Our Quarterly Meeting began at Joshua
+White's today." The following year he wrote that "brother Paynter and I
+have to hold a Quarterly meeting at Ammariah Sutton's at Lycommon." Each
+of these instances indicates the presence of some sort of voluntary
+religious association. However, it must be recalled that Fithian
+mentioned no such classes or meetings extant during his visit in July of
+1775.
+
+[13] _Fithian: Journal_, pp. 80-81.
+
+[14] _Journal of William Colbert_, Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793, and
+Saturday, Aug. 18, 1792.
+
+[15] _Ibid._, Tuesday, Oct. 15, 1793.
+
+[16] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[17] Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p.
+10.
+
+[18] _Ibid._
+
+[19] _See_ the Appearance Dockets Commencing in 1772 for Northumberland
+County and 1795 for Lycoming County.
+
+[20] _Journal of William Colbert_, Monday, June 18, 1792.
+
+[21] _Ibid._, Saturday, Aug. 4, 1792: "Calvinist must certainly be the
+most damnable doctrine upon the face of the globe." Sunday, July 29,
+1792: "Here for telling the people they must live without sin, I so
+offended a Presbyterian, that he got up, called his wife and away he
+went." Sunday July 22, 1792: "... in the afternoon for the first time
+heard a Presbyterian at Pine Creek.... He is an able speaker but could
+not, but, Calvinistic like speak against sinless perfection." Monday,
+Aug. 20, 1792: "... rode to John Hamilton's in the afternoon. Here the
+unhappy souls [Presbyterian Fair Play settlers] that were joined
+together in society, I fear are going to ruin." Thursday, Oct. 17, 1793:
+"I went to John Hamilton's on the Bald Eagle Creek spoke a few words to
+a few people: I do not think that is worth the preachers while to stop
+here."
+
+[22] F. B. Everett, "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River," _Journal of the Presbyterian Historical Society_,
+XII (1927), 481. According to the Reverend Mr. Everett, whose article
+also appeared in the Montgomery _Mirror_ for Oct. 27, 1926, the
+Scotch-Irish, with the Anglicans, were the dogmatists of Pennsylvania.
+The Quakers and Pietistic German sects were anti-dogmatic. Dogmatically
+adhering to his catechisms, the Scotch-Irishman "resented the aspersions
+cast upon dogma and creed." The frontier gave him freedom from the
+Quakers who still considered Presbyterians as those "who had burnt a
+Quaker in New England from the cart's tail, and had murdered other
+Quakers."
+
+[23] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259.
+
+[24] Thomas J. Wertenbaker, _The First Americans, 1607-1690_ (New York,
+1927). Wertenbaker's first chapter, "A New World Makes New Men,"
+develops this thesis generally for the American colonial experience,
+and, as Turner said, those first colonies were the first frontier.
+
+[25] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," pp. 28, 63. Clark notes
+that indentured servitude appeared in Muncy, where Samuel Wallis' great
+holdings made such service feasible. He also mentions Wallis' ownership
+of slaves, verified by the Quarter Session Docket of 1778. Wallis freed
+two Negro slaves, Zell and Chloe, posting a L30 bond that they would not
+become a charge on the township.
+
+[26] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262. _See also_ Dunaway, _The
+Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 180-200.
+
+[27] These "fringe area" participants in Fair Play society actually
+resided, for the most part, in Provincial territory and hence enjoyed
+greater stability and more land.
+
+[28] Calhoun, _A Social History of the American Family_, I, 207.
+
+[29] _Ibid._
+
+[30] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 271. Leyburn points out that since
+the Scotch-Irish were never a "minority," in the sense that their values
+differed radically from the norms of their areas of settlement, they
+never suffered the normlessness which Durkheim calls anomie--the absence
+of clear standards to follow. As Leyburn states it,
+
+    Anomie was an experience unknown to the Scotch-Irishman, for he
+    moved immediately upon arrival to a region where there was neither a
+    settlement nor an established culture. He held land, knew
+    independence, had manifold responsibilities from the very outset. He
+    spoke the language of his neighbors to the East through whose
+    communities he had passed on his way to the frontier. Their
+    institutions and standards differed at only minor points from his
+    own. The Scotch-Irish were not, in short, a "minority group" and
+    needed no Immigrant Aid society to tide them over a period of
+    maladjustment so that they might become assimilated in the American
+    melting pot.
+
+This, however, is not to suggest that minorities are necessarily anomic.
+The Jews, for example, were always a cultural minority in Europe, yet
+they adhered intensely to their own cultural norms.
+
+[31] Muncy Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers, p.
+10.
+
+[32] J. E. Wright and Doris S. Corbett, _Pioneer Life in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1940), p. 142.
+
+[33] _Ibid._ The existence of these "praying societies" is further
+substantiated in Colbert's _Journal_. During these services, lay persons
+gave exhortations or assisted Colbert in some fashion.
+
+[34] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 76.
+
+[35] Robert S. Cocks, _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The
+History of Northumberland Presbytery 1811-1961_ (n. p., 1961), p. 2.
+
+[36] _Fithian: Journal_, pp. 80-81.
+
+[37] Joseph Stevens, _History of the Presbytery of Northumberland, from
+Its Organization, in 1811, to May 1888_ (Williamsport, 1888), p. 38.
+
+[38] _Ibid._, p. 18.
+
+[39] Cocks, _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism_, p. 2.
+
+[40] Guy S. Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along the
+Susquehanna River," _Pennsylvania History_, XX (1953), p. 173.
+
+[41] _Ibid._, p. 174.
+
+[42] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 520.
+
+[43] Klett, "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering," p. 175.
+
+[44] _Journal of William Colbert_, Monday, June 18, 1792; and Robert
+Berger, "The Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, XII (1960), 274-280. According to the Reverend Robert Berger, of
+Hughesville, a few Baptist settlers came into Lycoming County from New
+Jersey, but were soon driven out by the Indians. Apparently, the
+Philadelphia Baptist Association sent missionaries to the area in 1775
+and 1778. However, not until the association commissioned Elders Patton,
+Clingan, and Vaughn in 1792 did any extensive Baptist preaching take
+place in this region. They were sent out for three months on the Juniata
+and the West Branch. The Loyalsock Baptist Church, established in 1822,
+is the first church.
+
+[45] Dietmar Rothermund, _The Layman's Progress: Religious and Political
+Experience in Colonial Pennsylvania 1740-1770_ (Philadelphia, 1961), p.
+142. As Rothermund describes it, "The Pilgrim's progress had turned into
+the layman's emancipation, and finally into the citizen's revolution"
+(p. 137). He calls "the political maturity which followed the era of
+religious emancipation ... America's real revolutionary heritage" (p.
+138).
+
+[46] _Ibid._, p. 137. It must first be recognized that American
+Presbyterianism differed from that of Scotland particularly with regard
+to local autonomy. The Presbyterian Church, like the United States under
+the Constitution of 1787, was federal in its governmental structure, and
+the autonomy of the local religious institutions was later carried into
+politics. Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 313, emphasizes the fact that
+the Scotch-Irishman's church had accustomed him to belief in government
+by the consent of the governed, in representative and republican
+institutions. The relationship between the church covenant and the
+social compact is quite direct. If men can bind themselves together to
+form a church, then it seems quite logical that they can bind themselves
+together to form a government. Fair Play democracy was simply political
+Presbyterianism. Its impact has been noted by a number of historians.
+Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 135, claims
+that "The actual means by which Pennsylvania was transformed from a
+proprietary province into an American commonwealth was the new political
+organization developed by the Scotch-Irish in alliance with the eastern
+radical leaders of the continental Revolutionary movement. This
+extra-legal organization, consisting of the committee of safety, the
+provincial and county committees of correspondence, and the provincial
+conventions, supplanted the regular provincial government by absorbing
+its functions." Becker, _Beginning of the American People_, p. 180,
+calls the Scotch-Irish a people "whose religion confirmed them in a
+democratic habit of mind."
+
+[47] Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, George Quigley's Will, p.
+69.
+
+[48] Maynard, _Historical View of Clinton County_, p. 208.
+
+[49] Carrie A. Hall and Rose G. Kretsinger, _The Romance of the
+Patchwork Quilt in America_ (New York, 1935), p. 27.
+
+[50] _Journal of William Colbert_, Thursday, Sept. 5, 1793.
+
+[51] Lycoming County Courthouse, Will Book #1, William Chatham's Will,
+p. 177. Chatham's bequest is "To Robert Devling My Fidel."
+
+[52] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 196.
+
+[53] Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary (1716-1791), microfilm transcript, 2
+rolls, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg. An
+example, found on p. 252, is this "_famous American Receipt for the
+Rheumatism_. Take of garlic two cloves, of gum ammoniac, one drachm;
+blend them by bruising together. Make them into two or three bolus's
+with fair water and swallow one at night and the other in the morning.
+Drink strong sassafras tea while using these. It banishes also
+contractions of the joints. 100 pounds been given for this."
+
+[54] Rebecca F. Gross, "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven _Express_,
+Aug. 3, 1963, p. 4.
+
+[55] Eugene P. Bertin, "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and
+Then_, VIII (1947), 257-258.
+
+[56] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, p. 193.
+
+[57] _Ibid._, p. 197.
+
+[58] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222. Mrs. Coldren refers to
+a tavern, just west of Chatham's Run, in the spring of 1775. The first
+church appeared in 1792.
+
+[59] "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," _Now and Then_, X (1954), 307. The
+diarist tells of a tavernkeeper who refused a man a pint of wine because
+"he had had enough" (Thursday, July 24, 1794).
+
+[60] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 148-150. Leyburn suggests, and the
+Fair Play settlers demonstrate, that Ulster and America were similar
+experiences. He says (p. 148) that the Scotch-Irish "lived on land in
+both regions often forcibly taken from the natives. The confiscation
+itself was declared legal by the authorities, and the actual settlement
+was made in the conviction that the land was now rightfully theirs.
+Might makes right--at least in the matter of life and land ownership."
+
+[61] _Fithian: Journal_, the _Journal of William Colbert_, and "Mr.
+Davy's Diary" all refer to the hospitality of the people of this
+frontier. For example, Fithian speaks of his hosts as "sociable, kind";
+while Colbert constantly mentions the "liberty" which he enjoyed in the
+various homes which he visited.
+
+[62] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 146-147. Leyburn suggests that
+belief in the superiority of the Presbyterian church to any king
+justifies revolt; if one may, others may, leading to anarchy. Thus
+freedom of worship for a minority allied itself in America with liberty
+of worship for all. The right of revolution, as it was acted upon in
+America, was also implied.
+
+[63] Loyalists in the West Branch Valley suffered the usual privations
+as this excerpt from the "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310,
+indicates: "_Thursday, July 24, 1794_.... Mr. Witteker and his family
+are of the people called Quakers but was turned out of the society
+during the time of war for paing the money called substitute [relief
+from the draft]* money to the Congress agents. M[r]. W's case is really
+hard. He suffered as above by his friends for aiding Congress and his
+estate was conviscated [_sic_] by the state for being a loyalist."
+[*Phrase bracketed in quotation.]
+
+[64] Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 197-198.
+
+[65] _Ibid._, p. 198. An example of this attitude is found in this entry
+in the "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 310: "This afternoon 24 July
+[1794] a person with two horses, one he rode, the other lead, called at
+Wittekers for a pint of wine, but on account of him being intoxicated
+before Mr. W. told him he had had enough & would not let him have any.
+Where could we find so disinterested a tavernkeeper in England? In
+England they never refuse as long as they pay, but here the man had the
+money ready if they would let him have the wine."
+
+[66] This conclusion was reached after the reading of some three hundred
+wills in the probate records of Northumberland and Lycoming counties.
+This particular reference is from James Caldwell's will, Nov. 20, 1815,
+located in Will Book #1, p. 108, Lycoming County Courthouse.
+
+[67] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 22. Beds and feather
+beds seem to have been status symbols of a sort often willed to the wife
+or included as a dowry.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER SIX
+
+_Leadership and the Problems of the Frontier_
+
+
+Any analysis of democracy in the Fair Play territory must consider the
+question of leadership and the particular problems of that frontier. The
+number of leaders and their roles, the marks of leadership, and the
+circumstances which brought certain men to the fore must all be
+considered. Was there some correlation between property-holdings, or
+national origin, and leadership? Were there certain offices conducive to
+the exercise of leadership? The subject of leadership entails inquiry
+into each of these areas.
+
+Unfortunately, only one biographical study of any Fair Play leader has
+ever been attempted, that of Henry Antes.[1] As a result, the patterns
+of leadership must be gleaned from court records, tax lists, lists of
+public officials, and petitions from the settlers of this frontier.
+Consequently, what follows gives us some general understanding of the
+nature of leadership but offers little in the way of insight into the
+personalities of the leaders.
+
+Using the Curti study as an example, certain objective criteria have
+been set up in analyzing leadership in the West Branch Valley.[2]
+Obviously, some leaders were more important than others. Their influence
+extended beyond the limits of the Fair Play territory. These leaders,
+provided that they stood out in respect to at least three of the four
+criteria established, have been categorized as regional leaders. These
+four criteria have been used in this study to determine regional
+leadership: (1) the holding of political office, (2) the ownership of
+better-than-average property holdings, (3) the operation of frontier
+forts, and (4) the holding of military rank of some significance.[3]
+
+Of these criteria, office holding appears to be the most important.
+Thus, regional leaders were generally re-elected to public office, or
+held more than one such office. Furthermore, it will be noted that these
+offices tended to be with the established governments of the State and
+county. Since some leaders never held any political office, another
+classification seemed necessary. Consequently, the role of local
+leadership was also classified.
+
+The influence of some men seems to have been strictly confined to the
+Fair Play territory, either by virtue of their election to some local
+office or by their prominence in some other phase of community life. As
+a result, local leaders have been considered as (1) those who held at
+least two local offices, or (2) those who exercised identifiable
+community leadership in a non-political context.
+
+After an extensive examination of the lists of public officials for
+Northumberland County, the tax lists for the same period, the records of
+the Fair Play men and the Committee of Safety, the accounts of the
+frontier forts in the region, and the military records of these
+settlers, it becomes evident that only three men can be considered as
+regional leaders and not more than seven or eight as local leaders.[4]
+Henry Antes, Robert Fleming, and Frederick Antes are the regional
+leaders; and Alexander Hamilton, John Fleming, James Crawford, John
+Walker, Thomas Hughes, Cookson Long, William Reed, and Samuel Horn are
+the local leaders. Obviously, the listings are too limited to offer any
+valid quantitative analysis.
+
+Henry Antes is undoubtedly the single most outstanding leader in the
+entire Fair Play country. Judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions,
+sheriff, justice of the peace, Fair Play spokesman, captain (later
+colonel) of Associators and commander of Fort Antes, miller and property
+owner, personal friend of John Dickinson and other Provincial leaders,
+Henry Antes was the top figure in civic, economic, military, and social
+affairs along the West Branch. Influential within and without the Fair
+Play territory, Henry Antes was truly the major leader in the valley.
+
+The Antes family had long played a significant role in the history of
+the Province of Pennsylvania. As MacMinn relates, Henry's father, Henry,
+Sr., had been "associated with the most prominent men of his time in
+movements for the public good."[5] A Moravian, the elder Antes had
+assisted Count Zinzendorf in his missionary efforts, aided Whitefield in
+his philanthropic endeavors, worked with Henry Muhlenberg in educating
+the German town community, and served with a marked impartiality as a
+justice of the peace.[6] From such stock came the necessary leadership
+for the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch frontier.
+
+Born near Pottstown in Montgomery County in 1736, young Henry may have
+learned of frontier opportunity from visitors to his father's inn, such
+as Zinzendorf and Spangenburg, who had traveled along the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna. Consequently, joined by his brother William, he signed
+an article of agreement on September 29, 1773, for the purchase of land
+in the West Branch Valley.[7] When another brother, Frederick, obtained
+property in the area later in that same decade, the Antes brothers,
+particularly Henry and Frederick, became the dominant political,
+economic, and social influence in the territory. Frederick, however, was
+more of an absentee leader since he never actually resided in the Fair
+Play territory.
+
+Although the combined holdings of the Antes brothers constituted only a
+little less than 700 acres, their gristmill, the first in the region,
+became the meeting place for the area settlers, providing a forum for
+the usual discussions of politics and prices.[8] From Lycoming Creek on
+the east to Pine Creek and the Great Island on the west, the frontier
+farmers brought their grain to the Antes mill, on the south side of the
+Susquehanna River opposite present Jersey Shore. While the milling went
+on, the men analyzed their common problems and debated the future of
+this pioneer land. If there was a center for the dissemination of news
+in the West Branch Valley, it was the Antes mill and fort, which was
+soon constructed on the property. Located in almost the center of the
+Fair Play territory (although actually across the river from it), where
+men met of necessity, and having had a father who had exerted influence
+and exercised leadership in Philadelphia County, the Antes brothers were
+well prepared to lead the West Branch pioneers.
+
+With their gristmill giving Henry and Frederick a decided economic edge,
+they soon became involved in the politics of the Fair Play territory,
+Northumberland County, and the Province of Pennsylvania. Henry became
+primarily a local and county leader, while his brother concentrated on
+county and Provincial and, later, State affairs. Both served as county
+judges--Henry, appointed in 1775, and Frederick, elected in 1784--which
+suggests judicial responsibility as the key to assuming major
+leadership, since Robert Fleming took Frederick's judicial post when he
+resigned to take a seat in the General Assembly.[9]
+
+By the summer of 1775, when Philip Vickers Fithian first included the
+West Branch in his itinerary--the valley by then supported some 100
+families--Henry Antes had already distinguished himself as a public
+servant. He, along with five others, had been commissioned by the county
+court to lay out a road from Fort Augusta to the mouth of Bald Eagle
+Creek;[10] he had served as a spokesman for the Fair Play men in a land
+title dispute;[11] he had been made a justice of the peace;[12] and he
+had been appointed as a judge of the Court of Quarter Sessions.[13] This
+was to be only the beginning, for in 1775, when the Associators were
+organized, Henry Antes was made captain of company eight, embodying the
+Nippenose and Pine Creek settlers.[14] But even this is not the complete
+picture, for when the settlers returned to the region in the eighties,
+following the Great Runaway of 1778, Antes became sheriff, the chief law
+enforcement officer of Northumberland County.[15] The popular miller had
+become the popular leader, a popularity enhanced by his interpretation
+of the sheriff's role, an interpretation which occasionally brought him
+into conflict with the State's leaders.[16]
+
+The leadership of the Antes brothers is further accentuated by the
+activities of Frederick Antes. Between 1776 and 1784 he was a delegate
+to the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention, justice of the peace,
+president judge of the county courts, county treasurer, commissioner of
+purchase for Northumberland County, a representative in the General
+Assembly, and a colonel of militia.[17] With Henry on the West Branch
+and Frederick frequently in Philadelphia, the Antes family had a
+constant finger on the pulse of Pennsylvania politics. Official duties,
+plus the strategic location of the Antes fort and mill, made Frederick
+and Henry Antes the most influential persons in the West Branch Valley
+during the operation of the Fair Play system. Eminently qualified by
+numerous public responsibilities, the Antes brothers were major leaders
+of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+Robert Fleming, the third regional leader in the territory, also served
+as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas for the county, although that
+service began in March, 1785, after the Fair Play territory was acquired
+by the State of Pennsylvania in the second Stanwix Treaty of 1784.[18]
+He became a justice of the peace at the same time.[19] Prior to his
+judicial obligations, Fleming had been a member of the county Committee
+of Safety, a township overseer, a representative in the General
+Assembly, a second lieutenant of Associators, and possibly a Fair Play
+man.[20] During the Revolution, he was primarily concerned with the area
+around the Great Island, serving at Reed's Fort (present Lock Haven) and
+on the Fleming estate, which some referred to as Fort Fleming. Robert
+had a brother, John, with whom Fithian stayed during his brief sojourn
+in the territory. Their combined holdings, the largest in the vicinity,
+ran to almost 3,000 acres, of which 1,250 acres were Robert's.[21]
+
+Certain conclusions can be drawn from these data regarding the regional
+leaders of the Fair Play territory. Better than average property
+holdings, extensive in the case of Robert Fleming; judicial
+responsibility, which was true of all three men; primary authority in
+frontier forts (the Antes brothers owned and commanded Antes Fort, and
+the Flemings operated their own stockade and commanded Fort Reed); and
+military rank ranging from lieutenant of Associators to colonel of
+militia: these characteristics signified major leadership in the West
+Branch Valley among the Fair Play settlers. Coincidentally, it can be
+noted that two of the three regional leaders, having served in the State
+legislature, had influence which reached to the State House in
+Philadelphia. Obviously, these men were known outside of the limited
+environs of the Fair Play territory. In fact, both Henry and Frederick
+Antes enjoyed a more than passing acquaintance with Benjamin Franklin
+and John Dickinson, two of the giants of this period of Pennsylvania's
+history.[22]
+
+A further observation which can be made concerning leadership relates to
+the question of national origin. Although the Fair Play territory has
+often been referred to as "Scotch-Irish country," the German Antes
+brothers performed the outstanding leadership roles on this frontier.
+Also, the specific geographic location of our regional leaders provides
+a final note of interest. All three of them, Henry and Frederick Antes,
+and Robert Fleming, actually resided outside the limits of the Fair Play
+territory. They were on the geographic fringe but at the leadership
+core. Their close proximity to the Fair Play territory, separated from
+it only by the Susquehanna River, in addition to their contacts with and
+positions in established government, gave these men an obvious political
+eminence. The forts located in both places and the Anteses' gristmill
+gave both the Flemings and the Anteses opportunity for leadership.
+
+Local leaders generally lived within the Fair Play territory, had
+average property holdings, and served on either the Fair Play tribunal
+or the township Committee of Safety. There are, of course, exceptions to
+each of these generalizations. The fort operators, Samuel Horn, William
+Reed, and John Fleming, resided on the Provincial or State side of the
+Susquehanna River. Furthermore, John Fleming was the largest property
+owner in the area with some 1,640 acres.[23] And one man, James
+Crawford, held the highly respected county office of sheriff.[24]
+
+Three of the local leaders, John Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and James
+Crawford, stand out from the rest, although for different reasons. John
+Fleming undoubtedly would have become a major leader had he lived
+longer--he died in 1777. His extensive property made his home the usual
+stop for itinerant pastors and other travelers in the valley, as
+Fithian's _Journal_ attests.[25] It also made him a figure of central
+significance in economic affairs. Alexander Hamilton was probably "the"
+local leader. A member of the Committee of Safety and presumably a Fair
+Play man, he was also the captain of Horn's Fort.[26] He is also the
+reputed author of the Pine Creek declaration. James Crawford was more
+noted for military exploits than for civic duties. Prior to his military
+service, Crawford had represented Northumberland County in the
+Constitutional Convention of 1776, which framed the State constitution
+and, later, commissioned him as a major in the Twelfth Pennsylvania
+Regiment.[27] Deprived of his commission after the Germantown campaign,
+Major Crawford returned home and was elected county sheriff, an office
+which he held until succeeded by Henry Antes.[28]
+
+Of the other local leaders, Horn and Reed held only lesser township
+offices, overseer and supervisor, respectively, in addition to operating
+frontier forts.[29] Cookson Long, mentioned as a Fair Play man in 1775
+in Eleanor Coldren's deposition, later commanded Fort Reed, for a time,
+as a captain of Associators.[30] The final two local leaders, John
+Walker and Thomas Hughes, both took turns as Fair Play men and as
+members of the local Committee of Safety.[31]
+
+In analyzing the local leadership roles which these various settlers
+filled, additional and pertinent conclusions become apparent. In the
+first place, the Fair Play men were obviously not the top leaders of the
+community. Henry Antes may have served as their spokesman in 1775, and
+it is quite possible that Robert Fleming was a member of the tribunal,
+but both were more important as county leaders. Secondly, Fair Play men
+were members of the Committee of Safety, a fact which suggests that
+their efforts may have been coordinated. Finally, returning to the
+question of national origin, six of these eight local leaders were
+either Scots, Scotch-Irish, or Irish. The other two were Germans. No
+Englishman was a leader, either regional or local, in the Fair Play
+territory between 1769 and 1784. Perhaps, as Carl Becker suggests, this
+was due to the fact that neither the German nor the Scotch-Irish
+immigrant held in his breast any sentiment of loyalty to King George, or
+much sympathy with the traditions or the leaders of English society.[32]
+
+What were the particular problems of this frontier and how effective
+were these leaders in meeting them? The question of defense, including
+the daily task of survival in the wilderness, the right of pre-emption,
+and the efforts to obtain frontier representation in the assembly: these
+were the main problems in this pioneer land along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna. All were not solved during the period under analysis, but
+the attempts to solve these and other problems afford us the opportunity
+to evaluate the leadership in the Fair Play territory.
+
+Doubtless, the most pressing public need on this frontier was protection
+from the marauding Indians who plagued these pioneers throughout the
+fifteen years encompassed by this study. Aroused by the British during
+the Revolution, the Indians of the Six Nations descended from New York
+into the West Branch Valley to harass and, finally, to drive the Fair
+Play settlers from their homes. Driven from their homes, the frontiersmen
+of the West Branch first gathered in the hastily-constructed and
+poorly-manned forts conveniently scattered along the Susquehanna from
+Jersey Shore to Lock Haven, but, ultimately, these too had to be
+evacuated in the Great Runaway in 1778.
+
+The severity of these attacks is evident from this petition from the
+settlers gathered at Fort Horn, above present McElhattan, pleading for
+military support in their perilous position:
+
+    _To the Honourable the Supreame Executive Councill of the
+    Commonwealth of Pennsyllvania, in Lancaster;_
+
+    Wee, your humble petitioners, the Inhabitance of Bald Eagle
+    Township, on the West Branch of Susquehannah, Northumberland County,
+    &c., &c., humbly Sheweth: that, Wherease, wee are Driven By the
+    Indians from our habitations and obblidged to assemble ourselves
+    together for our Common Defence, have thought mete to acquaint you
+    with our Deplorable situation. Wee have for a month by past,
+    endeavoured to maintain our ground, with the loss of nearly fifty
+    murdered and made Captives, still Expecting relief from Coll.
+    Hunter; but wee are pursuaded that the Gentleman has done for us as
+    mutch as has layd in his power; we are at len[g]th surrounded with
+    great numbers on every side, and unless Our Honourable Councill Does
+    grant us some Assistance wee will Be obblidged to evaquete [_sic_]
+    this frontier; which will be great encouragement to the enemy, and
+    Bee very injurious to our Common Cause. We, therefore, humbly
+    request that you would grant us as many men as you may Judge
+    suficient to Defend four small Garrisons, and some amunition, and as
+    we are wery ill prowided with arms, we Beg that you would afford us
+    some of them; for particulars we refer to the Bearer, Robert
+    Fleming, Esq'r, and Begs leave to Conclude. Your humble petitioners,
+    as in Duty Bound, shall ever pray.
+
+                                        Sined by us:[33]
+
+This petition was signed by some forty-seven settlers, including John
+and Robert Fleming, Alexander Hamilton, and Samuel Horn. Unfortunately,
+the much-needed assistance was not forthcoming, and Colonel Hunter soon
+sent instructions from Fort Augusta for the evacuation of the valley.
+This evacuation is, of course, the Great Runaway.[34] It is interesting
+to note, however, that the bearer of this petition was Robert Fleming,
+one of the regional leaders of the territory.
+
+Although forced to leave the West Branch Valley, the Fair Play settlers
+responded to Colonel Hunter's fervent plea to stay at Fort Augusta to
+help in the defense of this last frontier. Their gallant stand on the
+West Branch and their earnestly successful support of Fort Augusta, the
+last frontier outpost in central Pennsylvania, protected the interior,
+enabled the Continental Congress "to function in safety at a period when
+its collapse would have meant total disaster to the American cause," and
+provided a vivid demonstration of what a later president of the United
+States would call "that last full measure of devotion."[35]
+
+In the fall of 1778, following the earlier alliance with France, the
+tide of the Revolution began to flow in favor of independence,
+notwithstanding the fact that the Fair Play territory was now deserted.
+But for two years previous, when the issue of independence had been in
+grave doubt, the courageous pioneers of the West Branch stood their
+ground in tiny garrisons at Fort Antes, Fort Horn, and Fort Reed,
+resisting the attacking Indians at the insistence of their leaders, that
+freedom might be preserved. Perhaps it is a little-known story, but the
+fate of independence was in good hands with the Fair Play settlers of
+the West Branch Valley, who fought to preserve it.
+
+Towards the end of the Revolution the Fair Play settlers returned to the
+territory, and a new problem arose, that of title claims or, more
+particularly, the right of pre-emption. Still outside the bounds of the
+Commonwealth and organized government, these frontier squatters
+petitioned the Supreme Council for validation of their land claims.[36]
+Two petitions, one in August, 1781, and the other in March, 1784, were
+sent. Their claims were recognized by an act of the General Assembly
+passed in May, 1785.[37] By this time, the land in question had been
+opened for settlement by virtue of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784.
+Needless to say, their petitions had been prompted in part by fear of
+land speculators who were attempting to buy up their lands through the
+Land Office in Philadelphia. The prominence of local leaders, such as
+Alexander Hamilton and John Walker, is once again noted in these
+petitions. These petitions achieved notable results in that the right of
+pre-emption for the West Branch squatters was recognized by the
+Commonwealth long before the national government endorsed the principle.
+Furthermore, the validation of these claims beyond the purchase line of
+the Stanwix Treaty of 1768 provided the first legal recognition of
+pre-emption in the State of Pennsylvania.
+
+Unsuccessful in maintaining their homes against the incursive Indians,
+but successful in regaining them by right of pre-emption, the Fair Play
+settlers were also vitally concerned with representative democracy.
+Locally, on the county level, and in the Province and State, these
+frontiersmen sought to make their wishes known, both to and through
+their political leaders. How well they achieved these goals was
+influenced by the number of persons whom they elected to both legal and
+extra-legal offices at the various political levels.
+
+The Fair Play settlers managed to send two of their associates to the
+General Assembly in the decade after Lexington and Concord.[38] These
+two, Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, constituted a disproportionate
+representation, when one considers the limited population of the Fair
+Play community and the general under-representation of the frontier
+counties at this period. In fact, a few hundred families in and around
+the West Branch were surprisingly fortunate to have one of their number,
+Robert Fleming, in the General Assembly when, following a petition from
+the frontier counties in 1776, a new apportionment created an assembly
+in which fifty-eight legislators represented Pennsylvania's 300,000
+people.[39] However, the elections of both Fleming and Antes came after
+the new constitution of 1776, in which each county was given six
+representatives.[40] It can hardly be said that the West Branch Valley
+lacked adequate representation in the councils of the State.
+
+Furthermore, Frederick Antes was a delegate to that State Constitutional
+Convention. This not only emphasizes the leadership role of Antes, but
+also points up the good fortune of the Fair Play settlers in having one
+of their community participate in the framing of the new State
+government. Although the Fair Play settlers lived beyond the legal
+limits of settlement, they were very much involved in its political
+affairs.
+
+Aside from the General Assembly and the Constitutional Convention, these
+pioneers of the Northumberland County frontier placed three men on the
+county bench, one of whom was presiding judge.[41] Fair Play men became
+justices of fair play in the county courts.
+
+Concerning other county offices, the key position of sheriff was held
+continuously from 1779 to 1785 by members of the Fair Play
+community.[42] Here again, it appears that the proper administration of
+justice could be expected from Fair Play men.
+
+Locally, the rotational system of the Fair Play tribunal and the
+frequent changes in the composition of the Committee of Safety give rise
+to the conclusion that political democracy, in the sense of active
+participation in public office, was truly a characteristic of the Fair
+Play territory. Nine different men served on the three-man Committee of
+Safety from February of 1776 to February of 1777, three new members
+being elected semi-annually. Except for the two or three years following
+the Great Runaway, the three members of the Fair Play tribunal were
+elected annually.
+
+In conclusion, then, what can be said regarding the leadership of the
+Fair Play settlers? Except for the dangers from Indian hostility, which
+were compounded by the settlers' limited manpower, the leadership was
+more than adequate, one might say eminently successful, in meeting the
+needs of the frontier. It enacted law, interpreted it, and saw to it
+that the law was carried out on every political level with which the
+West Branch pioneers had contact. In short, it gave them a government
+of, by, and for themselves. This was _real_ representation by spokesmen
+of a small community, very different from _virtual_ representation in a
+distant Parliament, from which their independence had now been
+declared.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Edwin MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_ (Camden, N. J.,
+1900). This book is a mosaic of primary and secondary sources dealing
+with the entire area, rather than a standard biographical treatment of
+its particular subject.
+
+[2] Merle Curti, _The Making of an American Community: A Case Study of
+Democracy in a Frontier County_ (Stanford, 1959), pp. 417-441. This
+entire fifteenth chapter is devoted to both a quantitative and
+qualitative analysis of "leadership."
+
+[3] Wealth, i.e., liquid assets, was not necessarily a criterion on this
+agrarian frontier, where a man's assets were not easily convertible into
+cash. Hence, property was the main economic source of value.
+
+[4] The records of the first State and county officers are found in the
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 768-772, and John Blair
+Linn, _Annals of Buffalo Valley_ (Harrisburg, 1877), pp. 558-563. Some
+data are also available in Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton
+Counties_.
+
+The tax listings were located in the _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third
+Series, XIX, 437, 468, 557, and 618-622. Mrs. Russell also collected a
+listing for the years 1774 to 1800 for Northumberland County. Court
+records, pension claims, Meginness' _Otzinachson_ (1889) and _Frontier
+Forts of Pennsylvania_ provided the remaining data.
+
+[5] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 19.
+
+[6] _Ibid._, pp. 20-21. MacMinn also calls the senior Antes the father
+of the Unity Conferences of Christian Endeavor and presents a copy of a
+letter written on Dec. 17, 1741, calling for a New Year's Day meeting of
+Christians in Germantown in 1742 in support of this statement. Of his
+minor judicial role, MacMinn offers this account published in
+Christopher Saur's _Pensylvanische Berichte_ for May 16, 1756: "Were
+such magistrates more numerous, the poor would not have cause to
+complain and to weep over gross injustices which they have to suffer
+because persons are respected."
+
+[7] _Ibid._, p. 248.
+
+[8] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 484. _See also_, MacMinn, _On
+the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 324.
+
+[9] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 316, 413; and
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, p. 769.
+
+[10] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[11] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222.
+
+[12] Linn, _Annals of the Buffalo Valley_, p. 95; and Meginness,
+_Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 473.
+
+[13] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, p. 316.
+
+[14] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473.
+
+[15] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+[16] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 416-420. See
+also Alex. Patterson to John Dickinson (October 28, 1783) in the Zebulon
+Butler Papers, Wyoming Historical and Geological Society, Wilkes-Barre,
+Pa. Patterson, speaking of Antes' failure to arrest Zebulon Butler, said
+of Antes: "The Sheriff has not done his duty nor do I believe he intends
+it being. A party man among which I am sorry to see so little principels
+of humanity or honnor, Men who wish for popularity at the Expense of the
+Propperty and perhaps blood of their fellow Citizens...."
+
+[17] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 768-772, and MacMinn,
+_On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 330, 395, and 413.
+
+[18] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 769.
+
+[19] _Ibid._, p. 771.
+
+[20] _Ibid._, pp. 769, 771; Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton
+Counties_, pp. 473-474; and _Colonial Records_, XI, 367.
+
+[21] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 618.
+
+[22] MacMinn, _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes_, pp. 12 and 420.
+
+[23] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Third Series, XIX, 437.
+
+[24] _Colonial Records_, XII. 137.
+
+[25] _Fithian: Journal_, p. 81.
+
+[26] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 473. The full
+account of Hamilton's military service is given in the Hamilton Pension
+Papers in the Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical Society. Hamilton had
+also been a member of the group commissioned to lay out a road from Bald
+Eagle Creek to Fort Augusta. Linn, _History_, p. 472.
+
+[27] _Ibid._, p. 474, and Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1889), p. 474.
+
+[28] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+[29] Linn, _History of Centre and Clinton Counties_, p. 472.
+
+[30] _Ibid._, p. 473.
+
+[31] _Ibid._; Yeates, _Pennsylvania Reports_, I, 498; and Russell,
+"Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence," p. 4.
+
+[32] Becker, _Beginnings of the American People_, p. 180.
+
+[33] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, pp. 217-218. The
+petition was dated June 21, 1778. The situation had been further
+complicated by the enlistment the previous summer of many of the
+able-bodied men to aid Washington in Cambridge, Massachusetts. These
+men, "early in the service of their Country from the unpurchased land on
+the West Branch of the River Susquehanna," deprived the valley of its
+available manpower.
+
+[34] _See_ Chapter Two for a fuller description of the Great Runaway.
+
+[35] Helen Herritt Russell, "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Journal of
+the Lycoming Historical Society_, II, No. 4 (1961), 3-10. This article
+contains a few additions to an article by the same name by Mrs. Russell
+published in _The Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings
+and Addresses_, XXIII (1960), 1-16.
+
+[36] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 518-522.
+
+[37] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[38] Robert Fleming and Frederick Antes, as previously noted, had been
+elected in 1777 and 1784, respectively.
+
+[39] Dunaway, _History of Pennsylvania_, pp. 176, 196. Of these
+fifty-eight, twenty-eight came from the frontier counties of York,
+Berks, Bedford, Cumberland, and Northumberland.
+
+[40] Wallace, _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation_, pp. 105-106.
+
+[41] As previously noted, Henry Antes had been appointed judge of the
+Court of Quarter Sessions in 1775, and Frederick Antes and Fleming had
+been elected in 1780 and 1785, respectively. Frederick Antes was
+president judge.
+
+[42] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER SEVEN
+
+_Democracy on the Pennsylvania Frontier_
+
+
+One of the most often used and least understood words in the American
+lexicon is the term "democracy." In the colonial period, it was seldom
+used, except in denunciation. However, properly defined, it can help us
+to evaluate the Fair Play settlers in some understandable context.
+Etymologically stemming from two Greek words, _demos_, meaning "the
+people," and _kratos_, meaning "authority," democracy means "authority
+in the people" or, we can say, "self-determination." By
+self-determination is meant the right of the people to decide their own
+political, economic, and social institutions.
+
+Self-determination in its basic, or political, context can best be
+explained through James Bryce's definition of a democracy. Lord Bryce
+said:
+
+    The word Democracy has been used ever since the time of Herodotus to
+    denote that form of government in which the ruling power of a State
+    is legally vested, not in any particular class or classes, but in
+    the members of the community as a whole.[1]
+
+Analyzing the key phrases in Bryce's statement, we can best clarify the
+meaning of political self-determination.
+
+(1) "The ruling power of a State." Self-determination, as it is employed
+here, concerns the right of the people of Fair Play society to determine
+their own political institutions. Fair Play society did not constitute a
+state, but it was a political community, and in that sense Bryce's
+definition applies. Living outside the legal limit of settlement of
+Province and Commonwealth, these people could not obtain legal authority
+for their own rule, so, following the prevalent theory of the social
+compact, they formed their own government. The result was the annual
+election, by the people, of the Fair Play tribunal, the source of final
+authority in the Fair Play territory.
+
+(2) "Is legally vested." Fair Play society was actually illegal; that is
+to say, the settlements were made in violation of the laws of the
+Province. However, the extra-legal government which was formed was
+created by, and responsive to, the popular will. Since the actual
+authority for rule was vested in the people, it can be considered as
+legal for the Fair Play community.
+
+(3) "In the members of the community." The members of the Fair Play
+community, as previously noted, were not strictly resident within the
+geographic confines of the Fair Play territory. Communities, it has been
+said, are total ways of life, complexes Of behavior composed of all the
+institutions necessary to carry on a complete life, formed into a
+working whole.[2] Self-determination, as it is used here, suggests that
+the community as a whole participates in the decision-making process.
+
+(4) "Not in any particular class or classes, but in the members of the
+community as a whole." Bryce's definition here extends the
+interpretation of "the members of the community." Obviously, if any
+particular class or classes were vested with the final political
+authority, then the people as a whole, that is, the Fair Play community,
+would not exercise self-determination.
+
+The concept of self-determination, carried to an economic context,
+suggests that the people of the Fair Play community had the right to
+determine their own economic institutions. This means that they had the
+right to choose their own portion of land, subject, of course, to the
+will of the existing community, and to utilize it according to their own
+needs and interests. This meant that no undemocratic and feudalistic
+practices, such as primogeniture and entail, could exist. Granted that
+this is self-determination rather broadly interpreted in an economic
+context, the question is whether or not these people had the right to
+choose their own plot of ground and work it as they saw fit, unhampered
+by any preordained system of discrimination or restriction.
+
+Socially, the idea of self-determination is applied to evaluate the
+religious institutions, the class structure, and the value system. The
+application concerns, once again, the authority of the people to
+determine their own social patterns. It questions whether or not any
+Fair Play settler could worship according to the dictates of his own
+conscience. It evaluates the class structure to ascertain whether or not
+a superimposed caste system ordered the class structure of Fair Play
+society, rather than a community-determined system in which choice and
+opportunity provided flexibility and mobility. And finally, it considers
+whether or not the values of the Fair Play settlers were inculcated by
+some internal clique or external force, rather than being developed by
+the members of the community themselves.
+
+Did democracy exist on this Pennsylvania frontier? Was the Fair Play
+system marked by real representation and popular control? These
+questions must be answered before any judgment can be made concerning
+political democracy in the West Branch Valley.
+
+Was there equality of economic opportunity on this farmers' frontier?
+Was land available to all who sought it, and on equal terms? These
+problems need to be considered before we can attach the label
+"democratic" on the economic life of the Fair Play settlers.
+
+If democracy prizes diversity, as some claim, were the diverse elements
+of Fair Play society equally recognized?[3] Was the class structure open
+or closed, mobile or fixed? Did the mixed national stocks enjoy
+religious freedom? One needs to inquire into each of these areas prior
+to a final evaluation of Fair Play society.
+
+A useful tool for evaluating political democracy can be found in Ranney
+and Kendall's _Democracy and the American Party System_.[4] It suggests
+the use of popular sovereignty, political equality, popular
+consultation, and majority rule as criteria for democracy. Accepting
+these criteria as basic principles of democracy, we can begin to analyze
+the democratic character of the Fair Play system.
+
+A political system based upon popular sovereignty is one in which the
+final authority to rule is vested in the people. The question of who the
+people are is still before us today. In the fullest sense, popular
+sovereignty means rule by all the people, but in colonial America the
+"people" was a much more qualified term. It generally signified white,
+Protestant, adult males who were property owners. In the Fair Play
+territory, the ruling "people" were "the whole body" of adult male
+settlers who annually elected their governing tribunal and participated
+in the decisions of its "court."[5] Lacking an established church, or
+any church for that matter, and possessing property lying beyond legal
+limits of settlement, the Fair Play settlers could not have enforced
+religious or property qualifications for voting, even if they had so
+desired, and there is no evidence to indicate that they did.
+Furthermore, the frequency of elections, which were held annually, and
+the principle of rotating the offices among the settlers tended to
+emphasize the sovereignty of the people in this part of the West Branch
+Valley. The right of suffrage, it is true, had not been extended to
+women, but this was the rule throughout colonial America. Popular
+sovereignty, in its qualified eighteenth-century sense, was a basic
+characteristic of the political democracy which existed on this
+frontier.
+
+Political equality, that is "one man, one vote," was practiced by the
+pioneers of the West Branch. There was no additional vote given to the
+large property owners; in fact, as the tax lists indicate, there were no
+large property owners within the geographic limits of the Fair Play
+territory. Thus, each man, rather than a small ruling oligarchy, had the
+opportunity to participate in the decision-making process of the Fair
+Play community.
+
+In a democratic society, the people must be consulted by the policy
+makers prior to their exercise of the power of decision. Among the Fair
+Play settlers this basically democratic principle was vividly
+demonstrated in the case of disputed land titles, the primary concern of
+the Fair Play men. In both Eleanor Coldren's deposition in behalf of her
+deceased husband and in the Huff-Latcha case, it was established that
+the unanimous consent of the prospective neighbors had to be obtained
+before a favorable decision was rendered in behalf of the land
+claimants.[6] The frequency of elections, combined with the ease and
+regularity of assembly, provided the settlers with the opportunity to
+become acquainted with the circumstances of their problems. Here again,
+the paucity of specific data prompts us to some speculation regarding
+the nature and location of these meetings. However, it must be added,
+the Hamilton pension papers and the petitions to the Supreme Council in
+Philadelphia refer specifically to meetings at Fort Horn and Fort
+Antes.[7] Direct representation based upon popular consultation was a
+distinct trait of the political democracy in the Fair Play territory.
+
+The fourth principle of political democracy, majority rule, is probably
+the most controversial and confusing element of the combination.
+Absolute majority rule, its critics tell us, means majority "tyranny"
+and minority acquiescence, despite the fact that this fear is not
+empirically demonstrable.[8] The majority ruled absolutely in the Fair
+Play territory just as it did in the New England town meeting, and with
+similar results. However, it never restricted suffrage or public office
+to particular religious or nationality groups. Scotch-Irish, English,
+and German settlers participated equally in the political process.
+However, as we pointed out in the last chapter, the English did not
+enjoy leadership roles in the community.[9] Whether this was by accident
+or by design is difficult to ascertain. Perhaps it was just a further
+demonstration of the absolute rule of the majority with the Scotch-Irish
+and the Germans combining to form that majority.
+
+The nature of community implies shared interests and the prevailing
+interest in this frontier community was survival. Necessity undoubtedly
+caused the English minority to accept the Scotch-Irish and German
+leadership, because forbearance meant survival. Conversely, the
+Scotch-Irish and Germans could, and did, support the English in
+positions of responsibility on the basis of their mutual needs and their
+desire to maintain the community.[10] Not only physical survival but
+also economic survival were mutually desirable to Fair Play community
+members, and the decisions of the court were rendered on the basis of
+equal justice.[11]
+
+As long as minority feelings are given free expression in an atmosphere
+of mutual concern, there is little danger of misinterpretation by the
+majority. Such a climate prevailed in the meetings of the Fair Play
+settlers and the sessions of the Fair Play men; at least, there is no
+available evidence to the contrary.
+
+The nature and role of consensus in the Fair Play territory hinged upon
+what was best for the community. Fundamental agreement was reached,
+based upon mutual need apparent from open discussion. In the event of
+conflict, forbearance, which was in the best interest of the community,
+could be expected.[12] An examination of the appearance dockets of the
+county courts for Northumberland and Lycoming counties suggests,
+however, that this consensus did not extend to questions of land titles.
+Nevertheless, the all-inclusiveness of signatures on petitions to the
+Supreme Executive Council for protection from the Indians and for the
+recognition of the right of pre-emption, and the general response of the
+Fair Play settlers to calls for troops for the Continental Army indicate
+to some degree the nature and extent of that consensus.[13]
+
+Democracy, that is self-determination, did exist among the Fair Play
+settlers of this Pennsylvania frontier. There was no outside authority
+which legislated the affairs of the pioneers of the West Branch. They
+selected their own representatives, the Fair Play men, and maintained
+their control over them, a control which was assured both by annual
+elections and the full participation of the settlers in the
+decision-making process. The will of the majority prevailed, and that
+will was expressed through a community consensus reached by the full
+participation of political equals. It was neither radical nor
+revolutionary, but it was typical of the American colonial experience.
+The Fair Play settlers had not "jumped the gun" on independence,
+although they participated in the movement. They did not rebel against a
+ruling aristocracy. They simply governed themselves.
+
+Self-determination, as we have already stated, includes the right of the
+people to decide upon their own economic institutions. This right was
+asserted on the farmers' frontier of the West Branch. With free land
+available to those who worked it, provided the neighbors and the Fair
+Play men approved, economic opportunity was shared by the Scotch-Irish,
+English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and French settlers.[14] This
+sharing, in itself, was a demonstration of economic democracy.
+
+The labor system, too, was an affirmation of the democratic ideal.
+Because free land was available in the Fair Play territory, neither
+slavery nor involuntary servitude existed in this region, although it
+was found in immediately adjacent areas.[15] Free labor, family labor to
+be more exact, was the system employed in this portion of the West
+Branch Valley. Noticeable, too, was the spirit of cooperation in such
+enterprises as cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, harvesting, cornhuskings
+and the like. This mutual helpfulness was characteristic of the frontier
+and obviated the necessity of any enforced labor system.
+
+Tenancy was occasionally practiced in the Fair Play territory, although
+it appears that the tenant farmer suffered no feelings of inferiority,
+if the following case is any example:
+
+    ... Peter Dewitt ... leased the land in question to William
+    McIlhatton as a Cropper, who took possession of it after Huggins
+    left it: That the Terms of the Lease were that McIlhatton should
+    possess the Land about two or three Years, rendering hold of the
+    Crops to be raised unto Peter Dewitt, who was to find him a Team and
+    farming Utensils: That the Lease was in Writing and Lodged with a
+    certain Daniel Cruger who lived in the Neighborhood at that
+    Time.[16]
+
+Sometime later, McElhattan obtained the lease from Cruger and sold "his
+right" to William Dunn, claiming that Dewitt had failed to fill his end
+of the bargain, despite the fact that Eleanor Coldren gave evidence to
+the contrary. When challenged for selling Dewitt's land, McElhattan
+responded in a fashion which demonstrates the independent spirit of this
+lessee. He said "that he only sold his Right to Dunn and if Dunn would
+be such a fool as to give him forty or fifty pounds for Nothing He
+McIlhatton would be a greater fool for not taking it--for that Dunn knew
+what Right he (McIlhatton) had."[17] Obviously, if this case is
+indicative, and there were others, share-cropping did not induce
+attitudes of subservience.
+
+Religious freedom, in which Pennsylvania ranked second only to Rhode
+Island in colonial America, was enjoyed by the frontiersmen of the West
+Branch. It might, however, be better described as a freedom from
+religion rather than a freedom of religion. With no system of local
+taxation and no regular church, there was no establishment of religion.
+Nevertheless, this is not to suggest that religious qualifications were
+not applied to prospective landowners, potential voters, or members of
+the Fair Play community. Religious liberty had been guaranteed to
+Pennsylvanians in the Charter of Privileges of 1701, and no religious
+test was required for suffrage in the new State constitution in 1776.
+Belief in one God and in the inspiration of the Scriptures was required
+for members of the assembly, but bona fide Fair Play settlers were
+disqualified on geographic grounds anyhow.[18]
+
+There is no record of religious discrimination among the Fair Play
+settlers. In addition to the absence of a regular church, this was
+probably due, in part, to the religious composition of the population.
+The pioneers of the West Branch were Protestant Christians, and if
+denominational in their approach, either Presbyterian or Methodist. The
+friction between Methodists and Presbyterians appears to have been
+doctrinal rather than political or social.[19]
+
+The comparative economic equality in an area of free land had a
+democratizing influence on the social class structure. This three-class
+stratification, composed of property owners distinguished by their
+morality, other property owners, and tenants, was an open-class system
+marked by a noticeable degree of mobility. Fair Play settlers who began
+as tenants could, and did, become property owners.
+
+Since no one in the Fair Play territory could claim more than 300 acres
+under the Pre-Emption Act of 1785, there was little chance for the
+development of an aristocratic class.[20] It was a society of
+achievement in which the race was open to anyone who could acquire land,
+with the approval of his neighbors and the Fair Play men, and "improve"
+it. There is no evidence to indicate that the availability of land was
+restricted because of national origin, religious affiliation, or a
+previous condition of servitude. This is not to say that the judgments
+of neighbors may not have been based upon these criteria, but, at least,
+there is no record of such discrimination. The Fair Play settlers were
+eighteenth-century souls and romantic egalitarianism was not a
+characteristic of such persons. The frontier, however, broke "the cake
+of custom" and the necessities of that experience contributed to the
+development of democracy as we have defined it.
+
+A recent writer, analyzing the "democracy" of the Scotch-Irish, made his
+evaluation on the basis of the contemporary French definition of
+liberty, equality, and fraternity.[21] On this basis, the Scotch-Irish
+fail; but if we equate democracy with self-determination, the
+Scotch-Irish and the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch Valley can be
+seen as thoroughgoing democrats.
+
+The value system of the pioneers on the West Branch of the Susquehanna
+reflected, at least in part, the democracy of the frontier. The spirit
+of cooperation and mutual helpfulness was a prime characteristic of this
+frontier, as it was of others. Cabin-raisings, barn-raisings, and the
+cooperative enterprises at harvesttime enhanced the spirit of community
+and brought the settlers together in common efforts, which demonstrated
+their equality. Individualism could be harnessed for the common good,
+and such was the case among the Fair Play settlers in the struggle for
+economic survival.
+
+Faith, patriotism, and temperance were not necessarily democratic, but
+they also were part of the value system of the Fair Play settlers. In
+matters of faith, there was a certain "live and let live" philosophy,
+which had democratic implications. Despite the conflict between
+Methodists and Presbyterians, the members of the Presbyterian majority
+made their homes available to Methodist preachers.[22] This demonstrated
+a willingness at least to hear "the other side." Such an atmosphere is
+conducive to democracy, if not to conversion. There is little doubt,
+however, that this receptivity was due in part to the absence of any
+"regular" church or preacher. Here again, the necessities of the
+frontier made "democrats" of its occupants.
+
+The most intense patriots are often ethnocentric and chauvinistic. The
+Fair Play settlers were such patriots, according to one journalist.[23]
+However, the patriotism of the eighteenth century had not reached the
+level of concern for all mankind which finds expression today. The
+pioneers of the West Branch were democrats in an age not yet conditioned
+to democracy.
+
+Temperance, particularly with regard to the use of spirited beverages,
+usually implies abstinence, which is certainly not democratic if it is
+applied in a formally imposed prohibition without any local option.
+Abstinence by choice, however, is purely a matter of self-determination.
+But in an area where drinking was a commonly accepted practice, such as
+the frontier, the term signifies moderation. In the Fair Play territory
+drinking, but not drunkenness, was condoned. The spirit of the frontier,
+or the use of it, was not incompatible with democracy.
+
+Frontier values, for the most part then, were democratic in tendency.
+Noteworthy for their attitude of community cooperation and mutual
+helpfulness, supported by a faith which could not afford to be
+exclusive, temperate in their personal habits, particularly in the use
+of alcohol, the patriots of the Fair Play territory looked to a future
+filled with promise and opportunity for all the diverse elements of
+their society. This is the democracy which the frontier nurtured. It
+flourished in the West Branch Valley.
+
+In summary then, was self-determination the central theme in the Fair
+Play territory? Did the Fair Play settlers truly determine their own
+political, economic, and social institutions? The available data suggest
+that they did.
+
+The democracy of the Fair Play settlers encompassed popular sovereignty,
+political equality, popular consultation, majority rule, religious
+freedom, an open class structure, free land, free labor, and a value
+system whose dominating feature was mutual helpfulness. The democracy of
+Fair Play was basically the fair play of democracy.
+
+Observable in this atmosphere were the traits of a developing American
+character, traits which the frontier historian, Frederick Jackson
+Turner, defined as democratic.[24] These included the composite
+nationality of a population of mixed national origins; the self-reliance
+which the new experience of the frontier developed; the independence,
+both of action and in spirit, which the relative isolation of the
+environment promoted; a rationalistic, or pragmatic, approach to
+problems necessitated by circumstances lacking in precedents for
+solution; and perhaps a growing nationalism, marked by an identification
+with something larger than the mere Provincial assembly, something
+existing, but not yet realized, the American nation.
+
+These traits, in conjunction with Turner's thesis, are a major concern
+of the final chapter. That chapter will provide an evaluation of
+frontier ethnography as a technique for testing the validity of this
+interpretation of Turner's thesis on the Fair Play frontier of the West
+Branch Valley.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Quoted in Austin Ranney and Willmoore Kendall, _Democracy and the
+American Party System_ (New York, 1956), pp. 23-24.
+
+[2] Don Martindale, _American Society_ (New York, 1960), p. 105.
+
+[3] National Education Association, Educational Policies Commission,
+_The Education of Free Men in American Democracy_ (Washington, 1941),
+pp. 25-26.
+
+[4] Pp. 18-39.
+
+[5] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[6] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," pp. 220-222; Lycoming County Docket
+No. 2, Commencing 1797, No. 32; _see also_, Chapter Two, _passim_.
+
+[7] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217; and the Muncy
+Historical Society, Wagner Collection, Hamilton Papers.
+
+[8] Ranney and Kendall, _Democracy and the American Party System_, p.
+47. The authors argue here that the history of town meetings in America
+and the Parliamentary system in Great Britain shows hundreds of years
+without majority tyranny or civil war.
+
+[9] Chapter Six, pp. 78, 84.
+
+[10] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 770. For example, John
+Chatham, an English miller, was elected coroner in 1782, a minor role to
+be sure, but he was supported.
+
+[11] Smith, _Laws_, II, 196-197. In _Sweeney_ vs. _Toner_, an
+Englishman, Toner's property right was upheld because his absence was
+for military service, despite the fact that Sweeney, a Scotch-Irishman,
+was a majority representative.
+
+[12] Linn, "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers," p. 424. The case
+cited here, _Huff_ vs. _Satcha_, saw the use of militia to drive off a
+landholder whose title had been denied by the Fair Play men.
+
+[13] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217-218, 417-418, and
+518-522. On page 417, fifty-three officers and soldiers are described as
+"early in the service from the unpurchased land." Thirty-nine
+petitioners (p. 520) sought pre-emption, a claim repeated over two years
+later by some fifty-three settlers. The petition to the Supreme Council
+(p. 217) for protection from the Indians in 1778 prior to the Great
+Runaway bore forty-seven names.
+
+[14] _See_ Chapter Two for a demographic analysis of the Fair Play
+settlers.
+
+[15] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," p. 28.
+
+[16] "Eleanor Coldren's Deposition," p. 222.
+
+[17] _Ibid._
+
+[18] _See_ Chapter One for the geographic bounds of the Fair Play
+territory. The Fair Play territory did not come under State jurisdiction
+until the second Stanwix Treaty in 1784. Regardless, it must be
+remembered that settlers on the south bank of the Susquehanna actually
+participated in the political, economic, and social life of the
+community. The fact that these participants were often community leaders
+was pointed out in Chapter Six.
+
+[19] _See_ the footnotes in Chapter Five referring to _The Journal of
+William Colbert_.
+
+[20] Smith, _Laws_, II, 195.
+
+[21] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, pp. 311-314.
+
+[22] _The Journal of William Colbert._ Colbert had been received at
+Annanias McFaddon's (Aug. 20, 1792, Sept. 4, 1793) and John Hamilton's
+(July 23, 1792, Aug. 20, 1793), where he both preached and lodged. Both
+were Presbyterians, and, as noted earlier, Colbert expressed grave
+doubts concerning his efforts there.
+
+[23] "Diary of the Unknown Traveler," p. 307.
+
+[24] Turner, _Frontier and Section_, p. 5.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER EIGHT
+
+_Frontier Ethnography and the Turner Thesis_
+
+
+In the first chapter of his recent study, _The Making of an American
+Community_, Merle Curti suggests that "less is to be gained by further
+analysis of Turner's brilliant and far-ranging but often ambiguous
+presentations than by patient and careful study of particular frontier
+areas in the light of the investigator's interpretation of Turner's
+theory."[1] This study was undertaken with just such a purpose in mind.
+In addition, it is hoped that this investigation will give some insight
+into the value of ethnography and its usefulness as an analytic
+technique in studying the frontier.
+
+By definition, ethnography is "the scientific description of nations or
+races of men, their customs, habits, and differences."[2] Frontier
+ethnography is the scientific description of the full institutional
+pattern of a particular group of people, located specifically on a
+certain frontier, within a certain period of time. That institutional
+pattern is described from the analysis of data concerning the political
+and economic systems, and the social structure, including religion, the
+family, the value system, social classes, art, music, recreation,
+mythology, and folklore. Also, as noted in the first two chapters of
+this study, geographic and demographic data have been analyzed in an
+attempt to picture the area under observation and the people who
+inhabited that region. It is believed that these various data present a
+fuller view of the "way of life" of these people than the earlier
+politico-military accounts of nineteenth-century historians.
+
+Of course, there are certain limitations in this particular analysis.
+This study is not meant to be typical of the frontier experience or
+necessarily representative of frontier communities. However, it would
+have broader implications if a similar study were made for Greene County
+in western Pennsylvania, where a group composed mainly of Scotch-Irish
+Presbyterians also set up a "Fair Play system."[3] Furthermore, it is my
+interpretation of Turner's thesis which is being tested, not the
+validity of the thesis.
+
+Despite the fact that the Fair Play settlers and their "system" have
+been referred to by both Pennsylvania and frontier historians in the
+twentieth century, neither the settlers nor their system has been
+studied in depth.[4] Meginness and Linn, the foremost historians of the
+West Branch, were both nineteenth-century writers, and, unfortunately,
+twentieth-century scholars have not considered the Fair Play settlers
+worthy of their study. Biographical studies are limited to the work of
+Edwin MacMinn on Colonel Antes, completed in 1900. As a result, there
+has been a definite need for an investigation collating the researches
+of these earlier historians and based upon the available primary data.
+This study is an attempt to fill the void.
+
+The seeming paucity of primary source materials is a further
+complication to the student of Fair Play history. However, letters,
+journals, diaries, probate records, tax lists, pension claims, and court
+records offer adequate data to the inquiring historian, although the
+extra-legal character of the settlement seriously reduced the public
+record. Nevertheless, the broad scope of ethnography provides the kind
+of study for which the data supply a rather full picture of life on this
+frontier. Political, economic, and social patterns are discernible,
+although no day-by-day account for any extended period has been
+uncovered.
+
+This ethnographic analysis demonstrates the merits of the "civilization
+approach" to history. Examining every aspect of a society, it provides
+more than a mere "battles and leaders" account. The result gives insight
+into a "style of life" rather than a chronology of highlights. This
+study has investigated the full institutional structure of the Fair Play
+frontier, evaluating that structure in terms of a developing democracy,
+or, at least, of democratic tendencies.
+
+American civilization was a frontier civilization from the outset, and
+that frontier experience was significant in the development of American
+democracy. Frederick Jackson Turner's frontier thesis, which has
+probably inspired more historical scholarship than any other American
+thesis, stated that "the existence of an area of free land, its
+continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward,
+explain American development."[5] That development took place on
+successive frontiers stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific Coast
+over a period of almost three centuries. Turner's second frontier, the
+Allegheny Mountains, marked the farmers' frontier of the Fair Play
+settlers of the West Branch Valley.
+
+It was on the frontier, according to Turner, that the "true" traits of
+American character emerged; its composite nationality, its self-reliant
+spirit, its independence of thought and action, its nationalism, and its
+rationalistic approach to the problems of a pioneer existence. The Fair
+Play settlers, American frontiersmen, suggested some of these traits in
+their character. Recognizing the data limitations of this study, the
+evidence indicates some validation of this test of Turner's model.
+However, it would be presumptuous indeed to conclude that this analysis
+offers a complete demonstration of the impact of the frontier in the
+development of traits of character which Turner classified as American.
+
+The composite nationality of the Fair Play settlers is particularly
+evident from the demographic analysis offered at the beginning of this
+study.[6] Seven different national stock groups appeared on this
+frontier: Scotch-Irish, English, German, Scots, Irish, Welsh, and
+French. Here, indeed, was "the crucible of the frontier," in which
+settlers were "Americanized, liberated, and fused into a mixed race."[7]
+
+The legendary self-reliance of the frontiersman is not without some
+basis in fact. The nature of the frontier experience itself was
+conducive to its development. Its appearance among the Fair Play
+settlers is implied in various contexts. Politically, it is suggested in
+the creation of the Fair Play men, the annual governing tribunal, an
+extra-legal political agency in this extra-Provincial territory.
+Economically, it is intimated in the image of the frontier farmer
+tackling the wilderness with rifle and plow and the unbounded
+determination to make a better life for himself and his family.
+Socially, the self-reliance of these doughty pioneers is indicated in
+the continuation of their religious practices and worship, despite the
+absence of any organized church. Their self reliance is indicated, as
+well, in the flexibility of a social structure whose main criterion was
+achievement, a society in which "what" you were was more important than
+"who" you were. These examples are, of course, only brief glimpses of
+the elusive trait of self-reliance which Turner considered typical of
+the frontier.
+
+Independence, or the ability to act independently, was a characteristic
+frontier trait, according to Turner. The Fair Play settlers presented
+some contradictions. It is true that they organized their own system of
+government and the code under which it operated. However, their key
+leaders lived on the periphery; and the settlers petitioned the
+Commonwealth government for assistance in the vital questions of defense
+and pre-emption rights.[8] The Fair Play settlers were generally
+independent, a condition promoted by the necessities of frontier life;
+but, obviously, they were not isolated.
+
+It is difficult to assess the nationalizing influence of this particular
+frontier. In the first place, aside from the Second Continental
+Congress, there was no national government during most of the Fair Play
+period. The Articles of Confederation were not ratified until 1781, and
+Fair Play territory was opened to settlement after the Treaty of Fort
+Stanwix in 1784. Furthermore, the patriotism of the Fair Play settlers
+seems to reflect an ethnocentric pride in their own territory and an
+exaggerated interpretation of its significance to the developing
+nation.[9] Their patriotism was apparently for an ideal, liberty, to
+which they were devoted, having already enjoyed it in a nation only
+recently declared, but yet to be recognized. And, for its support, there
+had been a rush to the colors by these settlers "beyond the purchase
+line."[10] The "real American Revolution," as John Adams described it,
+was "in the minds and hearts of the people," and it was "effected before
+the war Commenced."[11] That revolution had already occurred in the
+Fair Play territory prior to the firing of "the shot heard round the
+world" on Lexington green.
+
+The frontier experience had a profound influence on the development of
+the American philosophy of pragmatism. Turner claimed that it was "to
+the frontier" that "the American intellect owe[d] its striking
+characteristics."[12] And the Fair Play settlers showed that
+
+    ... coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and
+    inquisitiveness; that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick to
+    find expedients; that masterful grasp of material things, lacking in
+    the artistic but powerful to effect great ends; that restless,
+    nervous energy; that dominant individualism, working for good and
+    for evil, and withal that buoyancy and exuberance which comes with
+    freedom....[13]
+
+The frontiersman of the West Branch was a free spirit in a free land, a
+doer rather than a thinker, more concerned with the "hows" than the
+"whys" of survival. This practical approach to problems can be seen in
+the homes he built, the tools he made, the clothes he wore, the
+political and social systems under which he operated, and the set of
+values by which he was motivated. The development of these
+characteristic American traits owed much to the frontier and the new
+experiences which it offered.
+
+This ethnographic analysis of the Fair Play settlers of the West Branch
+Valley has attempted to present a clearer picture of the "style of life"
+on this particular frontier and, in so doing, to suggest a further
+technique for the frontier historian. There are, no doubt, certain
+defects in this specific study, but the fault lies with the limitations
+of the data rather than the technique. The scope of this investigation
+has carried into questions of geography, demography, politics,
+economics, social systems, and leadership. Unfortunately, the frontier
+had not yet provided the leisure essential to artistic and aesthetic
+pursuits. Consequently, these areas were given a limited treatment.
+Furthermore, the mythology and folklore of this valley offered little of
+record. However, the breadth of this analysis has furnished evidence of
+the existence of democracy on this frontier and, thus, support for
+Turner's thesis, or at least for this interpretation of it.
+
+The geographic analysis has clarified the question of the Tiadaghton,
+demonstrating that Lycoming Creek, rather than Pine Creek, was the true
+eastern boundary of the Fair Play territory. The substantial destruction
+of an erroneous legend has been the main contribution of the geographic
+part of this study.[14] It is now clear that the Fair Play territory
+extended from Lycoming Creek, on the north side of the West Branch of
+the Susquehanna River, to the Great Island, just east of Lock Haven.
+This frontier region was beyond the legal limit of settlement of the
+Province and the Commonwealth from 1769 to 1784. Hence, within its
+limits was formed the extra-legal political system known as Fair Play.
+
+The demographic portion of this study has added to the undermining of
+the frontier myth of the Scotch-Irish. The evidence presented here
+indicates that it was the frontier, rather than national origin, which
+affected the behavior of the pioneers of the West Branch Valley. The
+Fair Play settlers, a mixed population of seven national stock groups,
+reacted similarly to the common problems of the frontier experience. In
+one important exception, the Fair Play system itself, there is, however,
+an apparent contradiction. Since no account of any "fair play system"
+has turned up in the annals of the Cumberland Valley, the American
+reservoir of the Scotch-Irish, it seems quite probable that the "system"
+originated in either Northern Ireland or Scotland, or else on the
+frontier itself. This probability offers good ground for further study,
+particularly when the existence of a similar "system" in Greene County,
+which was found in conjunction with this investigation, is
+considered.[15] If the Fair Play system originated on the frontier, why
+did not it also appear on the Virginia and Carolina frontiers where the
+Scotch-Irish predominated? Regardless, the lack of data corroborating
+the American origin of the Fair Play system leads to the conclusion that
+the germ of this political organization was brought to this country by
+the Scotch-Irish from their cultural heritage, and that those elements
+were found usable under the frontier conditions of both central and
+southwestern Pennsylvania. If so, the politics of "fair play" will add
+to, rather than detract from, the myth of the Scotch-Irish.
+
+This study has also brought forward the first complete account of court
+records validating the activities of the Fair Play men. Mainly concerned
+with the adjudication of land questions, this frontier tribunal
+developed an unwritten code which encompassed the problems of
+settlement, tenure, and ejectment. Subsequently reviewed in the regular
+courts of the counties of which the Fair Play territory became a part,
+these cases provide substantial evidence of the existence of a "system"
+as well as insight into the manner of its operation. The fairness of the
+Fair Play system is marked by the fact that none of the decisions of its
+tribunal was later reversed in the established county courts.
+Supplemented by the Committee of Safety for Northumberland County and
+augmented by peripheral leaders, who gave them a voice in the higher
+councils of the State, the Fair Play men and their government proved
+adequate to the needs of the settlers, until all were driven off in the
+Great Runaway of 1778.
+
+Some corroboration for the legendary tale of a "Fair Play Declaration of
+Independence" was found in the course of this study. Although
+consisting, in the main, of accounts culled from the records of
+Revolutionary War pension claimants made some eighty years after the
+event, the evidence is that of a contemporary.[16] However, the most
+common objection to this conclusion, that the Fair Play declaration was
+merely the reading of a copy of Jefferson's Declaration, is
+unsubstantiated by the archival descriptions.[17] Perhaps the Fair Play
+declaration is apocryphal, but, lacking valid disclaimers, the Hamilton
+data offer some basis for a judgment. It is the tentative conclusion of
+this writer that there was such a declaration on the banks of Pine Creek
+in July of 1776.
+
+The Fair Play territory was truly "an area of free land" in which a "new
+order of Americanism" emerged.[18] Individualistic and self-reliant of
+necessity, the pioneers of this farmers' frontier rationally developed
+their solution to the problem of survival in the wilderness, a
+democratic squatter sovereignty. With land readily available and a free
+labor system to work it, provided that the family was large enough to
+assure sufficient "hands," these agrarian frontiersmen not only
+cultivated the soil but also a free society. And their cooperative
+spirit, despite their mixed national origins, was markedly noticeable at
+harvesttime. From such spirit are communities formed, and from such
+communities a democratic society emerges.
+
+This analysis has not only described the geography and demography, the
+politics and economics of the Fair Play settlers; it has also examined
+the basis and structure of this society, including the value system
+which undergirded it. The results have pictured the religious liberty
+extant in a frontier society isolated from any regular or established
+church, a liberty of conscience which left each man free to worship
+according to the dictates of his own faith. This freedom, this right to
+choose for himself, made the Fair Play settler surprisingly receptive to
+other groups and their practices, practices which he was free to reject,
+and often did.[19] This analysis has also pointed up the class structure
+and its significance in promoting order in a frontier community. And
+finally, an examination of the value system of these Pennsylvania
+pioneers has provided an understanding of why they behaved as they did.
+
+The last major aspect of this investigation concerned the nature of
+leadership. Determined by the people, and thus essentially democratic,
+it had certain peculiar characteristics. In the first place, the top
+leaders tended to come from the Fair Play community in its broadest
+social sense, but not from the Fair Play territory in its narrow
+geographic sense.[20] Secondly, the political participation of the Fair
+Play settlers, if office-holding is any criterion, emphasizes the high
+degree of involvement in terms of the total population.[21] And last,
+this leadership appeared to be overextended when faced with the problem
+of defending its own frontier and the new nation which was striving so
+desperately for independence. Consequently, it was forced to turn to
+established government for support. This may have been the embryonic
+beginning of the nationalism which the frontier fostered in later
+generations.
+
+What then, is the meaning of this particular study, an ethnographic
+interpretation of Turner's thesis? Turner himself, gave the best
+argument for ethnography. He said that
+
+    ... the economist, the political scientist, the psychologist, the
+    sociologist, the geographer, the student of literature, of art, of
+    religion--all the allied laborers in the study of society--have
+    contributions to make to the equipment of the historian. These
+    contributions are partly of material, partly of tools, partly of new
+    points of view, new hypotheses, new suggestions of relations,
+    causes, and emphasis. Each of these special students is in some
+    danger of bias by his particular point of view, by his exposure to
+    see simply the thing in which he is primarily interested, and also
+    by his effort to deduce the universal laws of his separate science.
+    The historian, on the other hand, is exposed to the danger of
+    dealing with the complex and interacting social forces of a period
+    or of a country from some single point of view to which his special
+    training or interest inclines him. If the truth is to be made known,
+    the historian must so far familiarize himself with the work, and
+    equip himself with the training of his sister-subjects that he can
+    at least avail himself of their results and in some reasonable
+    degree master the essential tools of their trade.[22]
+
+Frontier ethnography is just such an effort.
+
+The frontier ethnographer then, because of his interdisciplinary
+approach, can capture the spirit of pioneer life. And if, as Turner
+suggested, the frontier explains American development, then frontier
+ethnography presents an understanding of the American ethos with its
+ideals of discovery, democracy, and individualism.[23] These ideals
+characterize "the American spirit and the meaning of America in world
+history."[24]
+
+The ideal of discovery, "the courageous determination to break new
+paths," as Turner called it, was abundantly evident in the Fair Play
+territory of the West Branch Valley.[25] This innovating spirit can be
+seen in the piercing of the Provincial boundary, despite the restrictive
+legislation to the contrary, and the establishment of homes in Indian
+territory.[26] It was also demonstrated in a marvelous adaptability in
+solving the new problems of the frontier, problems for which the old
+dogmas were no longer applicable. The new world of the Susquehanna
+frontier made new men, Americans.
+
+Self-determination, the ideal of democracy as we have defined it, was
+the cornerstone of Fair Play society. Its particular contribution was
+the Fair Play "system" with its popularly elected tribunal of Fair Play
+men. Perhaps this was the proper antecedent of the commission form of
+local government which came into vogue on the progressive wave of the
+late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Regardless, the
+geographic limitations of the Fair Play territory, the frequency of
+elections, and the open conduct of meetings tend to substantiate the
+democratic evaluation which has been made of the politics of this
+frontier community. Furthermore, as was pointed out in the last chapter,
+this self-determination was the key characteristic of the economic and
+social life of these people.[27]
+
+The pioneer ideal of creative and competitive individualism, which
+Turner considered America's best contribution to history and to
+progress, was an essential of the frontier experience which became an
+integral part of the American mythology.[28] The "myth of the happy
+yeoman," as one historian called it, is still revered in American
+folklore and respected in American politics, whether it is outmoded or
+not.[29] The primitive nature of frontier life developed this
+characteristically American trait and the family, the basic
+organization of social control, promoted it. It was this promotion, with
+its antipathy to any outside control, which stimulated the Revolution,
+creating an American nation from an already existing American character.
+
+The individualism of the West Branch frontier is also apparent in the
+administration of justice. The Fair Play system emphasized the
+personality of law, by its very title, rather than the organized
+machinery of justice.[30] Frontier law was personal and direct,
+resulting in the unchecked development of the individual, a circumstance
+which Turner considered the significant product of this frontier
+democracy.[31] Being personal, though, it had meaning for those affected
+by it, as an anecdote noted earlier indicated.[32]
+
+Individualism has become somewhat of an anachronism in a mass society,
+but its obsolescence today is part of the current American tragedy. The
+buoyant self-confidence which it inspired has made much of the American
+dream a reality. Legislation, it is true, has taken the place of free
+lands as the means of preserving democracy, but it will be a hollow
+triumph if that legislation suppresses this essential trait of the
+American character, its individualism. No intelligent person today would
+recommend a return to the laissez-faire individualism of the Social
+Darwinists of the late nineteenth century, but it must be admitted that
+a society emphasizing the worth of the individual and dedicated to
+principles of justice and fair play, the banner under which the
+frontiersmen of the West Branch operated, has genuine merit.
+
+Whether the historian is analyzing old frontiers or charting new ones,
+the timeless question remains: does man have the intelligence adequate
+to secure his own survival? The old frontiers, such as the Fair Play
+territory of the West Branch of the Susquehanna, were free lands of
+opportunity for a better life, and the history of the westward movement
+of the American people gives ample proof of their conquest. But the new
+frontiers are not so clearly marked or so easily conquered. Perhaps a
+re-examination of the history of the old frontiers can give increased
+meaning to the problems of the new. This investigation was attempted, in
+part, to serve such a purpose.
+
+The intelligent solution to the problem of survival for the pioneers of
+the West Branch Valley was fair play. The ethnography of the Fair Play
+settlers is the record of the democratic development of an American
+community under the impact of the new experience of the frontier.
+
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] P. 2.
+
+[2] _The Oxford Universal Dictionary_ (Oxford, 1955), p. 637.
+
+[3] Solon and Elizabeth Buck, _The Planting of Civilization in Western
+Pennsylvania_ (Pittsburgh, 1939), pp. 431 and 451.
+
+[4] _See_, for example, Dunaway, _A History of Pennsylvania_, p. 146,
+and _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 159-160; _also_,
+Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 306.
+
+[5] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 1.
+
+[6] _See_ Chapter Two.
+
+[7] Quoted by Ray Allen Billington in his introduction to Turner,
+_Frontier and Section_, p. 5.
+
+[8] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, III, 217-218, 518-522.
+
+[9] This pride was notably demonstrated in the insistence of the Fair
+Play settlers that a stand be made at Fort Augusta following the Great
+Runaway. Previous to this, they had pleaded for support for "our Common
+Cause" in the defense of this frontier. _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second
+Series, III, 217.
+
+[10] _Pennsylvania Archives_, Second Series, X, 27-31, 417, and Fifth
+Series, II, 29-35.
+
+[11] Quoted in Clinton Rossiter, _The First American Revolution_ (New
+York, 1956), pp. 4-5.
+
+[12] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 37.
+
+[13] _Ibid._
+
+[14] _See also_, George D. Wolf, "The Tiadaghton Question," _The Lock
+Haven Review_, Series I, No. 5 (1963), 61-71.
+
+[15] Buck, _The Planting of Civilization in Western Pennsylvania_, pp.
+431, 451.
+
+[16] Anna Jackson Hamilton to Hon. George C. Whiting, Commissioner of
+Pensions, Dec. 16, 1858, Wagner Collection, Muncy Historical Society.
+
+[17] _Colonial Records_, X, 634-635. The following resolution of
+Congress was entered in the minutes of the Council of Safety on July 5,
+1776:
+
+    _Resolved_, That Copies of the Declaration be sent to the several
+    Assemblies, Conventions, and Councils of Safety, and to the several
+    Commanding Officers of the Continental Troops, that it be proclaimed
+    in each of the United States, and at the Head of the Army.
+
+                                    By order of Congress.
+                                        sign'd, JOHN HANCOCK, Presid't.
+
+Provision was also made for the reading in Philadelphia at 12 noon on
+July 8, and letters were sent to Bucks, Chester, Northampton, Lancaster,
+and Berks counties with copies of the Declaration to be posted on Monday
+the 8th where elections for delegates were to be held. For some reason,
+the frontier counties of Bedford, Cumberland, Westmoreland, York, and
+Northumberland, contiguous to the Fair Play territory, were omitted from
+these instructions.
+
+[18] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 1, 18.
+
+[19] _The Journal of William Colbert_ gives frequent testimony to this
+statement, as indicated in Chapter Five.
+
+[20] _See_ the map in Chapter One for the geographic boundaries of the
+Fair Play territory. Note the location of the top leaders, Henry and
+Frederick Antes and Robert Fleming, in Chapter Six.
+
+[21] The number of different office-holders runs to better than ten per
+cent of the population.
+
+[22] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 333-334.
+
+[23] _Ibid._, pp. 306-307.
+
+[24] _Ibid._, p. 306.
+
+[25] _Ibid._
+
+[26] Meginness, _Otzinachson_ (1857), pp. 163-164.
+
+[27] _See_ Chapter Seven for an evaluation of "Democracy on the
+Pennsylvania Frontier."
+
+[28] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, p. 307.
+
+[29] Richard Hofstadter, "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," _American
+Heritage_, VII, No. 3 (April, 1956), 43-53.
+
+[30] The term "the personality of the law" is Turner's and emphasizes
+the men who carried out the law, rather than its structure. The fact
+that the ruling tribunal of the West Branch Valley was referred to as
+the "Fair Play men" rather than the "tribunal" illustrates this
+contention.
+
+[31] Turner, _The Frontier in American History_, pp. 253-254.
+
+[32] _See_ Chapter Three, n. 24.
+
+
+
+
+_Bibliography_
+
+
+BOOKS
+
+Albion, Robert G. and Leonidas Dodson (eds.). _Philip Vickers Fithian:
+Journal, 1775-1776._ Princeton, 1934.
+
+American Council of Learned Societies. "Report of the Committee on
+Linguistic and National Stocks in the Population of the United States,"
+_Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year
+1931_, I. Washington, 1932.
+
+Andrews, Charles M. _Colonial Folkways._ New Haven, 1919.
+
+----. _Guide to the Materials for American History to 1783 in the Public
+Record Office of Great Britain._ Washington, 1912.
+
+---- and Frances G. Davenport. _Guide to the Manuscript Materials for
+the History of the United States to 1783, in the British Museum, in
+Minor London Archives, and in the Libraries of Oxford and Cambridge._
+Washington, 1908.
+
+Barck, Oscar T., Jr., and Hugh T. Lefler. _Colonial America._ New York,
+1958.
+
+Bates, Samuel P. _Greene County._ Chicago, 1888.
+
+Becker, Carl L. _Beginnings of the American People._ Ithaca, N. Y.,
+1960.
+
+Bell, Herbert. _History of Northumberland County, Pennsylvania._
+Chicago, 1891.
+
+Billington, Ray Allen. _Westward Expansion._ New York, 1960.
+
+Boyd, Julian P., and Robert J. Taylor (eds.). _The Susquehanna Company
+Papers_, 1750-1775. 6 vols. Ithaca, N. Y., 1962.
+
+Bridenbaugh, Carl and Jessica. _Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in
+the Age of Franklin._ New York, 1962.
+
+Buck, Solon J. and Elizabeth H. _The Planting of Civilization in Western
+Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1939.
+
+Calhoun, Arthur W. _A Social History of the American Family_, I. New
+York, 1960.
+
+Cocks, Robert S. _One Hundred and Fifty Years of Evangelism, The History
+of Northumberland Presbytery, 1811-1961._ 1961.
+
+Commager, Henry S. _Documents of American History_, I. New York, 1958.
+
+Crick, B. R. and Miriam Alman (eds.). _A Guide to Manuscripts Relating
+to America in Great Britain and Ireland._ New York, 1961.
+
+Curti, Merle, _et al._ _The Making of an American Community, A Case
+Study of Democracy in a Frontier County._ Stanford, 1959.
+
+Day, Richard E. (comp.). _Calendar of the Sir William Johnson
+Manuscripts in the New York State Library._ Albany, N. Y., 1909.
+
+DePuy, Henry F. _A Bibliography of the English Colonial Treaties with
+the American Indians including a Synopsis of Each Treaty._ New York,
+1917.
+
+DeSchweinitz, Edmund A. _The Life and Times of David Zeisberger._
+Philadelphia, 1870.
+
+Doddridge, Joseph. _Notes on the Settlement and Indian Wars of the
+Western Parts of Virginia and Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1912.
+
+Dunaway, Wayland F. _A History of Pennsylvania._ Englewood Cliffs, N.
+J., 1948.
+
+----. _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania._ Chapel Hill, 1944.
+
+Egle, William H. _History of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania._
+Philadelphia, 1883.
+
+---- (ed.). _Historical Register: Notes and Queries, Historical and
+Genealogical, relating to Interior Pennsylvania_, 2 vols. Harrisburg,
+1883-84.
+
+----. _Pennsylvania Genealogies; Scotch-Irish and German._ Harrisburg,
+1886, 1896.
+
+Frost, Robert. _Complete Poems of Robert Frost._ New York, 1949.
+
+Hall, Carrie A., and Rose G. Kretsinger. _The Romance of the Patchwork
+Quilt in America._ New York, 1935.
+
+Hanna, C. A. _The Scotch-Irish._ 2 vols. New York, 1902.
+
+Jones, U. J. _History of the Early Settlements of the Juniata Valley._
+Philadelphia, 1856.
+
+Klett, Guy S. _Presbyterians in Colonial Pennsylvania._ Philadelphia,
+1937.
+
+Leopold, Richard W., and Arthur S. Link (eds.). _Problems in American
+History._ Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1957.
+
+Leyburn, James G. _The Scotch-Irish: A Social History._ Chapel Hill,
+1962.
+
+Lincoln, Charles A. (comp.). _Calendar of Sr. William Johnson
+Manuscripts in the Library of the American Antiquarian Society._
+("Transactions of the Society," Vol. XI.) Worcester, 1906.
+
+Linn, John B. _History of Centre and Clinton Counties, Pennsylvania._
+Philadelphia, 1883.
+
+----. _Annals of Buffalo Valley._ Harrisburg, 1877.
+
+MacMinn, Edwin. _On the Frontier with Colonel Antes._ Camden, N. J.,
+1900.
+
+Maginnis, T. H., Jr. _The Irish Contribution to American Independence._
+Philadelphia, 1913.
+
+Martin, A. E., and H. H. Shenk. _Pennsylvania History Told by
+Contemporaries._ New York, 1925.
+
+Martindale, Don. _American Society._ New York, 1960.
+
+Maynard, D. S. _Historical View of Clinton County, from its Earliest
+Settlement to the Present Time._ Lock Haven, 1875.
+
+Meginness, John F. _Biographical Annals of the West Branch Valley._
+Williamsport, 1889.
+
+----. _History of Lycoming County, Pennsylvania._ Chicago, 1872.
+
+----. _Otzinachson: or a History of the West Branch Valley of the
+Susquehanna._ Philadelphia, 1857.
+
+----. _Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley of the
+Susquehanna._ Williamsport, 1889.
+
+National Education Association. _The Education of Free Men in American
+Democracy._ Washington, 1941.
+
+O'Callaghan, E. B. _Documentary History of the State of New York_, I.
+Albany, N. Y., 1849.
+
+_The Oxford Universal Dictionary._ Oxford, 1955.
+
+Parkes, Henry Bamford. _The American Experience._ New York, 1959.
+
+The Pennsylvania Writers' Project, Work Projects Administration. _A
+Picture of Clinton County._ Williamsport, 1942.
+
+----. _A Picture of Lycoming County._ Williamsport, 1939.
+
+Proud, Robert. _History of Pennsylvania in North America._ 2 vols.
+Philadelphia, 1797, 1798.
+
+Ranney, Austin, and Willmoore Kendall. _Democracy and the American Party
+System._ New York, 1956.
+
+Rossiter, Clinton. _The First American Revolution._ New York, 1956.
+
+Rothermund, Dietmar. _The Layman's Progress._ Philadelphia, 1961.
+
+Rupp, Israel D. (ed.). _A Collection of Thirty Thousand Names of German,
+Swiss, Dutch, French, Portuguese, and other Immigrants in Pennsylvania,
+Chronologically Arranged from 1727 to 1776._ Harrisburg, 1856.
+
+Sanderson, W. H. _Historical Reminiscences_, ed. Henry W. Shoemaker.
+Altoona, 1920.
+
+Sergeant, Thomas. _View of the Land Laws of Pennsylvania with Notices of
+its Early History and Legislation._ Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, 1838.
+
+Shimmell, Lewis S. _Border Warfare in Pennsylvania During the
+Revolution._ Harrisburg, 1901.
+
+Singmaster, Elsie. _Pennsylvania's Susquehanna._ Harrisburg, 1950.
+
+Smith, Charles. _Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania_, II.
+Philadelphia, 1810.
+
+Stevens, Benjamin F. _Catalogue Index of Manuscripts in the Archives of
+England, France, Holland, and Spain relating to America, 1763-1783._
+London, 1870-1902. (In manuscript in the Library of Congress.)
+
+Stevens, Joseph. _History of the Presbytery of Northumberland._
+Williamsport, 1881.
+
+Sullivan, James (ed.). _The Papers of Sir William Johnson_, I-III.
+Albany, 1921.
+
+Taylor, George R. _The Turner Thesis Concerning the Role of the Frontier
+in American History_ ("Problems in American Civilization."). Boston,
+1956.
+
+Theiss, Lewis E. "Early Agriculture," _Susquehanna Tales_ (Sunbury,
+1955), 88-89.
+
+Tome, Philip. _Pioneer Life; or Thirty Years a Hunter._ Harrisburg,
+1928.
+
+Trinterud, Leonard J. _The Forming of an American Tradition: A
+Re-Examination of Colonial Presbyterianism._ Philadelphia, 1949.
+
+Turner, Frederick Jackson. _Frontier and Section: Selected Essays of
+Frederick Jackson Turner._ Intro. by Ray Allen Billington. Englewood,
+Cliffs, N. J., 1961.
+
+----. _The Frontier in American History._ New York, 1963.
+
+Volwiler, Albert T. _George Croghan and the Westward Movement
+1741-1783._ Cleveland, 1926.
+
+Wallace, Paul A. W. _Conrad Weiser._ Philadelphia, 1945.
+
+----. _Indians in Pennsylvania._ Harrisburg, 1961.
+
+----. _Pennsylvania: Seed of a Nation._ New York, 1962.
+
+Webb, Walter Prescott. _The Great Plains._ New York, 1931.
+
+Wertenbaker, Thomas J. _The First Americans 1607-1690._ New York, 1962.
+
+----. _The Founding of American Civilization: The Middle Colonies._ New
+York, 1949.
+
+Wittke, Carl. _We Who Built America._ 1963.
+
+Wright, J. E., and Doris S. Corbett. _Pioneer Life In Western
+Pennsylvania._ Pittsburgh, 1940.
+
+Wright, Louis B. _Culture on the Moving Frontier._ Bloomington, Ind.,
+1955.
+
+----. _The Atlantic Frontier._ New York, 1947.
+
+----. _The Cultural Life of the American Colonies, 1607-1763._ New York,
+1957.
+
+Yeates, Jasper. _Pennsylvania Reports_, I. Philadelphia and St. Louis,
+1871.
+
+
+PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
+
+_Appearance Docket Commencing 1797_, No. 2. Lycoming County, Office of
+the Prothonotor, Williamsport.
+
+_Colonial Records_, IX. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, X. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XI. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XII. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Colonial Records_, XX. Harrisburg, 1852.
+
+_Pennsylvania Archives_, [First Series], XI. Philadelphia, 1855.
+
+----, [First Series], XII. Philadelphia, 1856.
+
+----, Second Series, II. Harrisburg, 1876.
+
+----, Second Series, III. Harrisburg, 1875.
+
+----, Second Series, XVII. Harrisburg, 1890.
+
+----, Third Series, XI-XXII. Harrisburg, 1897.
+
+_New Purchase Applications, Nos. 1823 and 2611_, April 3, 1769. Bureau
+of Land Records, Harrisburg.
+
+_Report of the Commission to Locate the Site of the Frontier Forts of
+Pennsylvania._ Harrisburg, 1916.
+
+
+ARTICLES AND ESSAYS
+
+Baelyn, Bernard. "Political Experiences and Enlightenment Ideas in
+Eighteenth-Century America," _American Historical Review_, LXVII
+(January, 1962), 339-351.
+
+Beck, Herbert H. "Martin Meylin, A Progenitor of the Pennsylvania
+Rifle," _Papers Read Before the Lancaster County Historical Society_,
+LIII (1949), 33-61.
+
+Berger, Robert. "The Story of Baptist Beginnings in Lycoming County,"
+_Now and Then_, XII (July, 1960), 274-280.
+
+Bertin, Eugene P. "Primary Streams of Lycoming County," _Now and Then_,
+VIII (October, 1947), 258-259.
+
+Carter, John H. "The Committee of Safety of Northumberland County," _The
+Northumberland County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_,
+XVIII (1950), 33-54.
+
+Champagne, Roger. "Family Politics Versus Constitutional Principles: The
+New York Assembly Elections of 1768 and 1769," _William and Mary
+Quarterly_, Third Series, XX (January, 1963), 57-79.
+
+Clark, Chester. "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," _Northumberland
+County Historical Society Proceedings and Addresses_, VII (1935), 16-44.
+
+Deans, John Bacon. "The Migration of the Connecticut Yankees to the West
+Branch of the Susquehanna River," _Proceedings of the Northumberland
+County Historical Society_ (1954), 34-55.
+
+"Diary of the Unknown Traveler," _Now and Then_, X (January, 1954),
+307-313.
+
+"Eleanor Coldren's Depositions," _Now and Then_, XII (October, 1959),
+220-222.
+
+Everett, F. B. "Early Presbyterianism along the West Branch of the
+Susquehanna River," _Journal Presbyterian Historical Society_, XII
+(October, 1927), 481-485.
+
+Garrison, Hazel Shields. "Cartography of Pennsylvania Before 1800,"
+_Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, LIX (July, 1935),
+255-283.
+
+Gross, Rebecca F. "Postscript to the Week," Lock Haven _Express_ (August
+3, 1963), 4.
+
+Hofstadter, Richard. "The Myth of the Happy Yeoman," _American
+Heritage_, VII (April, 1956), 43-53.
+
+Johns, John O. "July 4, 1776--Rediscovered." _Commonwealth: The Magazine
+for Pennsylvania_, II (July, 1948), 2-16.
+
+Jordan, John W. (contributor), "Spangenberg's Notes of Travel to
+Onondaga in 1745," _Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, II
+(No. 4, 1878), 424-432.
+
+Klett, Guy S. "Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Pioneering Along The
+Susquehanna River," _Pennsylvania History_, XX (April, 1953), 165-179.
+
+Linn, John Blair. "Indian Land and Its Fair Play Settlers, 1773-1785,"
+_The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, VII (No. 4, 1883),
+420-425.
+
+"Map Drawn by John Adlum, District Surveyor, 1792, Found Among the
+Bingham Papers," _Now & Then_, X. (July, 1952), 148-150.
+
+Meginness, John F. "The Scotch-Irish of the Upper Susquehanna Valley,"
+_Scotch-Irish Society of America Proceedings and Addresses_, VIII
+(1897), 159-169.
+
+Neal, Don. "Freedom Outpost," _Pennsylvania Game News_, XXXI (July,
+1960), 6-10.
+
+Russell, Helen Herritt. "The Documented Story of the Fair Play Men and
+Their Government," _Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical
+Society_, XXII (1958), 16-43.
+
+----. "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Journal of the Lycoming
+Historical Society_, II (No. 4, 1961), 3-10.
+
+----. "The Great Runaway of 1778," _The Northumberland County Historical
+Society Proceedings and Addresses_, XXIII (1960), 1-16.
+
+----. "Signers of the Pine Creek Declaration of Independence,"
+_Proceedings of the Northumberland County Historical Society_, XXII
+(1958), 1-15.
+
+Silver, James W. (ed.). "An Autobiographical Sketch of Chauncey
+Brockway," _Pennsylvania History_, XXV (April, 1958), 137-161.
+
+Stille, C. J. "Pennsylvania and the Declaration of Independence,"
+_Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, XIII (No. 4, 1889),
+385-429.
+
+Wallace, Paul A. W., Excerpt from letter, Sept. 2, 1952, _Now and Then_,
+X (October, 1952), 184.
+
+Wilkinson, Norman B. (ed.). "Mr. Davy's Diary," _Now and Then_, X
+(April, 1954), 336-343.
+
+Williams, E. Melvin. "The Scotch-Irish in Pennsylvania," _Americana_
+XVII (1923), 374-387.
+
+Williams, Richmond D. "Col. Thomas Hartley's Expedition of 1778," _Now
+and Then_, XII (April, 1960), 258-259.
+
+Wolf, George D. "The Tiadaghton Question," _The Lock Haven Review_,
+Series I, No. 5 (1963), 61-71.
+
+Wood, T. Kenneth (ed.). "Journal of an English Emigrant Farmer,"
+_Lycoming Historical Society Proceedings and Papers_, No. 6 (1928).
+
+----. _Now and Then_, X (July, 1952), 148-150.
+
+---- (ed.). "Observations Made By John Bartram In His Travels From
+Pennsylvania to Onondaga, Oswego and the Lake Ontario in 1743," _Now and
+Then_, V (1936), 90.
+
+
+UNPUBLISHED STUDIES
+
+Turner, Morris K. "The Commercial Relations of the Susquehanna Valley
+During the Colonial Period." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University
+of Pennsylvania, 1916.
+
+
+_MANUSCRIPTS_
+
+MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS
+
+Zebulon Butler Papers, Wyoming Historical and Geological Society,
+Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
+
+Rev. John Cuthbertson's Diary, 1716-1791 (microfilm, 2 reels). The
+Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.
+
+Journal of William Colbert (typescript). Property of the Rev. Charles F.
+Berkheimer of Williamsport, Pa. Original (1792-1794) at the Garrett
+Biblical Seminary, Chicago. (Copy also at Lycoming College,
+Williamsport.)
+
+Revolutionary War Pension Claims (typescript). Wagner Collection, Muncy
+Historical Society and Museum of History, Muncy, Pa.
+
+
+PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE
+
+Mrs. Solon J. Buck, Washington, D. C, June 22, 1963, to the author.
+
+Alfred P. James, Pittsburgh, July 16, 1963, to the author.
+
+Peter Marshall, Berkeley, Calif., May 19, 1962, to the author.
+
+Mrs. Phyllis V. Parsons, Collegeville, Pa., October 21, 1962, to the
+author.
+
+Paul A. W. Wallace, Harrisburg, February 16, 1961, July 30, August 24,
+and December 17, 1962, to the author.
+
+
+
+
+_Index_
+
+
+ Adlum, John, 9, 10, 13
+
+ Alexander, James, 26
+
+ Allegheny Mountains, 1, 2, 47, 102
+
+ Allison, Rev. Francis, 67
+
+ American Revolution, 23, 33, 34, 44, 49, 54, 68, 71, 84, 86, 103, 104, 110
+
+ Antes, Frederick, 77-82, 87
+
+ Antes, Henry, Jr., 40, 42, 76-83, 101
+
+ Antes, Henry, Sr., 78
+
+ Antes, Joseph, 42
+
+ Antes, Philip, 42
+
+ Antes, William, 78
+
+ Antes Mill, 79, 80, 82
+
+ Art, 70
+
+ Arthur, Robert, 41
+
+ Atlee, Samuel J., 5
+
+
+ Bald Eagle Creek, 22, 48, 67, 79
+
+ Bald Eagle Mountains, 14
+
+ Bald Eagle Township, 45, 46, 84
+
+ Bald Eagle's Nest, 48
+
+ Baptists, 68
+
+ Barn-raisings, 60, 95, 97
+
+ Bartram, John, 9-11, 13
+
+ Bertin, Eugene P., 7
+
+ "Beulah Land," 71
+
+ Bingham, William, 11
+
+ Blackwell, 71
+
+ Bonner, Barnabas, 40
+
+ Books, 69, 70
+
+ Brainerd, Rev. David, 67
+
+ Bryce, James, 89, 90
+
+ Bucks County, 19
+
+ Burnet's Hills, 6
+
+
+ "Cabin right," 37
+
+ Cabin-raisings, 48, 51, 60, 74, 95, 97
+
+ Caldwell, Bratton, 40, 41
+
+ Calhoune, George, 26
+
+ Cammal, 71
+
+ Campbell, Cleary, 26, 62
+
+ Campbell, William, Jr., 26
+
+ Carlisle Presbytery, 67
+
+ Charter of Privileges, 96
+
+ Chester County, 19, 20
+
+ Children, 55
+
+ Clark, Francis, 42
+
+ Clark, John, 26
+
+ Colbert, William, 61-63, 65, 70
+
+ Coldren, Eleanor, 40, 83, 92, 96
+
+ Commerce, 56
+
+ Committee of Safety, 34, 44, 45, 48, 54, 77, 81-83, 88, 106
+
+ Connecticut, 20, 21, 23, 31
+
+ Constitutional Convention, Pennsylvania (1776), 80, 83, 87
+
+ Continental Congress, 85, 103
+
+ Cooke, William, 26
+
+ "Corn right," 37
+
+ Council of Safety, 34, 44
+
+ Covenhoven, Robert, 22
+
+ Crawford, James, 77, 82, 83
+
+ Cruger, Daniel, 96
+
+ Culbertson, Mr., 67
+
+ Cumberland County, 19, 20
+
+ Cumberland Valley, 47, 105
+
+ Curti, Merle, 76, 100
+
+
+ Dauphin County, 19, 20
+
+ Davy, Mr., 56, 63
+
+ Declaration of Independence, 42, 43, 71, 74, 106
+
+ "Declaration of Independence" of Fair Play Settlers, 42-44, 61, 62, 71,
+       74, 83, 106, 107
+
+ Defense, 84, 103, 108
+
+ Demography, 16-29, 100, 104-107
+
+ DeSchweinitz, Edmund A., 8, 10
+
+ Dewitt, Abraham, 40
+
+ Dewitt, Peter, 95, 96
+
+ Dickinson, John, 43, 78, 81
+
+ Donegal Presbytery, 67
+
+ Dougherty, Samuel, 40
+
+ Drinking, 71, 72, 74, 75, 98
+
+ Duncan, Mr., 38
+
+ Dunn, William, 96
+
+
+ Economic institutions, 89-91, 97, 99-102, 104, 107, 109;
+   _see also_ Farming
+
+ Education, 17, 58, 65, 69
+
+ Ejectment, 35-39, 41, 106
+
+ English, 16-20, 24-26, 28, 54, 57, 58, 83, 84, 93, 95, 102
+
+ Ettwein, Bishop John, 9, 10, 13
+
+ Evans, Lewis, 9-11, 13
+
+
+ Fair Play men, 3, 31, 35-36, 38, 40, 41, 45, 73, 77, 81-83, 92, 94, 95,
+       97, 102, 109;
+   _see also_ Tribunal, Fair Play
+
+ Faith, 17, 68, 73, 75, 98, 99
+
+ Family life, 17, 58, 64, 65, 68, 100, 110
+
+ Ferguson, Thomas, 40
+
+ Fithian, Philip Vickers, 9, 10, 13, 43, 53, 61, 66, 67, 69, 79, 82
+
+ Fleming, Betsey, 53
+
+ Fleming, John, 43, 66, 67, 69, 77, 81, 82, 85
+
+ Fleming, Robert, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87
+
+ Forster, Thomas, 26
+
+ Fort Antes, 34, 78, 80, 81, 86, 93
+
+ Fort Augusta, 22, 71, 79, 85
+
+ Fort Fleming, 81
+
+ Fort Horn, 34, 82-84, 86, 93
+
+ Fort Muncy, 34
+
+ Fort Reed, 34, 81, 83, 86
+
+ Fort Stanwix, Treaties of, 2, 3, 5-9, 12, 13, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 36,
+       67, 81, 86, 103
+
+ Forts, 64, 77, 81-83
+
+ Franklin, Benjamin, 52, 81
+
+ French, 2, 16-18, 58, 86, 95, 102
+
+ French and Indian War, 2, 16, 21
+
+
+ Galbreath, Robert, 9, 11
+
+ General Assembly, 9, 11, 79, 80, 81, 84, 86, 87, 96
+
+ George III, 84
+
+ Germans, 16-20, 24-26, 28, 54, 57, 58, 82-84, 93, 95, 102
+
+ Germantown, 78, 83
+
+ Great Island, 3, 12, 14, 34, 35, 40, 48, 67, 79, 81, 105
+
+ Great Runaway 21-23, 29, 33, 34, 71, 80, 84, 85, 88, 106
+
+ Great Shamokin Path, 47, 48
+
+ Greene County, 100, 101, 105
+
+ Grier, Rev. Isaac, 67
+
+ Grier, James, 40, 41
+
+ _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_, 40
+
+ Gristmills, 54, 64
+
+
+ Haines, Joseph, 40
+
+ Hamilton, Alexander, 43, 77, 82, 85, 86
+
+ Hamilton, Anna Jackson, 43, 44, 62, 66, 71, 107
+
+ Hamilton, John, 44
+
+ Hartley, Col. Thomas, 22, 23
+
+ Harvest, 53, 74, 95, 98, 107
+
+ Hill, Aaron, 6
+
+ Homes, 51, 52, 59, 104
+
+ Horn, Samuel, 77, 82, 83, 85
+
+ Hospitality, 60, 73
+
+ Huff, Edmund, 40, 41
+
+ Huff-Latcha (Satcha) case, 40, 41, 92
+
+ Huggins, Mr., 95
+
+ Hughes, James, 38, 39
+
+ Hughes, Thomas, 38, 39, 77, 83
+
+ _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, 36-40
+
+ Hunter, Col. Samuel, 21, 22, 84, 85
+
+
+ Immigration, 19-21, 24, 25, 28, 29
+
+ "Improvements," 37-39, 41, 58, 64, 72, 97
+
+ Indentured servitude, 64, 95
+
+ Independence, 68, 95, 103;
+   _see also_ Declaration of Independence
+
+ Indians, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 21-24, 29, 41, 42, 63, 67, 84, 86, 88,
+       94, 109
+
+ Individualism, 17, 72, 74, 98, 104, 107, 109, 110
+
+ Industry, 54, 55
+
+ Intermarriage, 58, 60
+
+ Irish, 16-18, 58, 83, 95, 102
+
+ Irwin (Irvin), James, 26, 40
+
+
+ Jamison, John, 26
+
+ Jersey Shore, 15, 19, 34, 42, 79, 84
+
+ Johnson, Sir William, 2, 21
+
+ Jones, Isaiah, 26
+
+ Juniata Valley, 20, 48
+
+
+ Kemplen, Thomas, 40, 41
+
+ Kendall, Willmoore, 91
+
+ Kincaid, Mr., 42
+
+ King, Robert, 26
+
+ King, William, 40, 41
+
+
+ Labor, 95, 99, 107
+
+ Lancaster, 70
+
+ Lancaster County, 19, 20, 38
+
+ Land claims, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38-40, 45, 62, 73, 80, 86, 92-94, 106
+
+ Land Office, 12, 21, 24, 86
+
+ Larrys Creek, 14, 15
+
+ Latcha, Jacob, 40
+
+ Law, unwritten, 37-39
+
+ Leadership, 36, 76-88, 104, 107, 108
+
+ Lewisburg, 67
+
+ Leyburn, James G., 37, 53
+
+ "Limping Messenger," 4, 8, 10
+
+ Linn, John Blair, 5-7, 20, 101
+
+ Lock Haven, 2, 14, 15, 34, 61, 81, 84, 105
+
+ Locke, John, 31
+
+ Logan, James, 16
+
+ Long, Cookson, 40, 77, 83
+
+ Love, Robert, 67
+
+ Lycoming Church, 67
+
+ Lycoming County courts, 33, 35, 36, 62, 65, 72, 94
+
+ Lycoming Creek 2-6, 9-15, 21, 24, 30, 35, 48, 67, 79, 105
+
+ Lycoming _Gazette_, 49
+
+ Lycoming Township, 28
+
+ Lydius, John Henry, 23
+
+
+ McElhattan, Pa., 84
+
+ McElhattan, William, 95, 96
+
+ McKean, Thomas, 22, 36, 37
+
+ McMeans, William, 40
+
+ MacMinn, Edwin, 78, 101
+
+ Manning, Richard, 70
+
+ Marshall, Peter, 12
+
+ Martin, John, 41
+
+ Maynard, D. S., 6, 7
+
+ Medical practices, 70, 71
+
+ Meginness, John, 4-7, 10, 20, 41, 42, 101
+
+ Methodists, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 97, 98
+
+ Milesburg, 48
+
+ Military service, 38-41, 45, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 94
+
+ Milton, 62
+
+ Ministers, itinerant, 66, 69, 71, 73
+
+ Missionaries, 67
+
+ Montgomery County, 78
+
+ Montour, Andrew, 10
+
+ Montoursville; _see_ Ostonwaken
+
+ Moravians, 78
+
+ Muhlenberg, Henry, 78
+
+ Muhlenberg, Hiester H., 9
+
+ Muncy, 14, 20, 34, 64
+
+ Muncy Creek, 20
+
+ Muncy Hills, 50
+
+ Music, 70, 100
+
+
+ National origins, 16-18, 26, 33, 36, 57, 58, 61, 64, 73, 76, 82, 83,
+       91, 93, 97, 99, 102, 105, 107
+
+ Nationalism, 99, 102, 103, 108
+
+ New Hampshire, 31
+
+ New Jersey, 19, 20
+
+ "New Purchase," 8, 11, 12, 20, 21, 24, 29, 64
+
+ New York, 19, 20, 84
+
+ Newspapers, 49
+
+ Niagara, N. Y., 8
+
+ Nippenose Valley, 42, 80
+
+ Nittany Valley, 48
+
+ Northumberland County, 24-26, 35, 38, 56, 77, 79, 80, 83, 84, 87, 106
+
+ Northumberland County courts, 33, 36, 39, 41, 48, 62, 65, 72, 94
+
+ Northumberland _Gazette_, 49
+
+ Northumberland Presbytery, 67
+
+
+ Office holding, 76, 77, 79, 87, 88, 92, 108
+
+ "Old Purchase," 11
+
+ Onondaga (Syracuse), N. Y., 8, 9
+
+ Orange County, N. Y., 20
+
+ Ostonwaken (Montoursville), 4, 8
+
+
+ Paine, Thomas, 43
+
+ Parr, James, 40
+
+ Patriotism, 71, 73-75, 98, 99, 103
+
+ Paul, William, 41
+
+ Pennamite Wars, 20
+
+ Petitions, 28, 33, 76, 86, 87, 93, 94, 103
+
+ Philadelphia, 52, 80, 81
+
+ Philadelphia County, 19, 79
+
+ Pine Creek, 2-15, 19, 30, 35, 43, 44, 48, 62, 67, 71, 79, 80, 105, 107
+
+ Pine Creek Church, 67
+
+ Pine Creek Township, 24, 28
+
+ Plymouth Colony, 31
+
+ Political equality, 17, 69, 73, 75, 91, 92, 95, 99
+
+ Pottstown, 78
+
+ Pragmatism, 99, 102, 104
+
+ "Praying societies," 66
+
+ Pre-emption, 27-29, 33, 38, 39, 58, 84, 86, 94, 97, 103
+
+ Presbyterianism, 17, 29, 33, 61-63, 65-69, 74, 97, 98, 101
+
+ Price, John, 26
+
+ Proclamation of 1763, 2, 3, 21
+
+ Property right, 35, 72
+
+
+ Quilting, 49, 60, 70, 74
+
+
+ Ranney, Austin, 91
+
+ Read, Mr., 38
+
+ Recreation, 71, 100
+
+ Reed, William, 45, 77, 82, 83
+
+ Religion, 33, 58, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 73, 74, 91-93, 96, 97, 99, 100,
+       103, 107
+
+ Revolution; _see_ American Revolution
+
+ Rhode Island, 31, 96
+
+ Roads, 48
+
+ Rodey, Peter, 36, 37
+
+
+ Schebosh, John, 4
+
+ Scotch-Irish, 16-21, 24, 25, 28-30, 33, 36, 37, 47, 53, 54, 57-60,
+       63-65, 70-72, 74, 82-84, 93, 95, 97, 101, 102, 105, 106
+
+ Scots, 16-18, 28, 58, 83, 95, 102
+
+ Self-determination, 89-91, 94, 97-99, 109
+
+ Self-reliance, 102, 103, 107
+
+ Self-sufficiency, 54, 56-58
+
+ Sergeant, Thomas, 6
+
+ Settlement, 35-37, 39, 72, 73, 90, 106
+
+ Sheshequin Path, 8-10, 48
+
+ Shickellamy, 9, 10
+
+ Shippen, Justice Edward, 39
+
+ Singmaster, Elsie, 8
+
+ Slavery, 64, 95
+
+ Smith, Charles, 38
+
+ Smith, Daniel, 38
+
+ Social compact, 31, 90
+
+ Social structure, 53, 58, 59, 64, 73, 75, 91, 97, 99-101, 103, 104,
+       107, 109
+
+ Sour's ferry, 69
+
+ Spangenburg, Bishop Augustus, 4, 8-10, 13, 78
+
+ Squatters' rights, 24, 72, 107
+
+ Stover, Martin, 9, 11
+
+ Suffrage, 33, 34, 92, 93, 96
+
+ Sunbury, 22, 47-49
+
+ Supreme Court, Pennsylvania, 36, 39
+
+ Supreme Executive Council, 44, 45, 86, 93, 94
+
+ Sweeney, Morgan, 41
+
+ Syracuse, N. Y.; _see_ Onondaga, N. Y.
+
+
+ Tax lists, 25-27, 34, 56, 59, 76, 77, 101
+
+ Temperance, 73-75, 98, 99
+
+ Tenancy, 64, 95-97
+
+ Tenure, land, 37-40, 106
+
+ Tiadaghton Creek, 2-14, 24, 105
+
+ "Tiadaghton Elm," 13, 14, 43, 71
+
+ Tilghman, James, 12
+
+ "Tomahawk right," 37
+
+ Toner, John, 41
+
+ Tools, 49, 50, 52, 53, 70, 104
+
+ Tribunal, Fair Play, 32-36, 42, 48, 50, 58, 61, 72, 73, 82, 83, 88, 90,
+       92, 94, 102, 106, 109;
+   _see also_ Fair Play men
+
+ Turner, Frederick Jackson, 1, 19, 99-102, 104, 108, 109
+
+
+ Values, 58, 65, 68, 72, 91, 97-100, 104, 107
+
+ Virginia, 72, 105
+
+ Voluntary associations, 58, 60-62
+
+
+ Walker, John, 77, 83, 86
+
+ Wallace, Paul A. W., 13, 23
+
+ Weiser, Conrad, 4, 9-11, 13
+
+ Welsh, 16-18, 26, 28, 58, 95, 102
+
+ Whitefield, George, 78
+
+ Williamsport, 2, 49
+
+ Wills, 65, 69, 72, 73, 75, 101
+
+ Winters Massacre, 23
+
+ Women, 55, 59, 60, 65
+
+ Wyoming Massacre, 21-23
+
+ Wyoming Valley, 20
+
+
+ York County, 19
+
+
+ Zeisberger, David, 4, 8, 10
+
+ Zinzendorf, Nicholas von, 78
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Endnotes
+
+    Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.
+
+    Archaic spellings in quoted material have been retained.
+
+    The following discrepancies have been noted and corrected where
+    possible:
+
+      Page 26, Chart 4. The data in column headed '1774' does not tally
+      with the total below. With no obvious solution, the table remains
+      as originally published.
+
+      Footnote 18, Chapter 3. 'See nn. 6 and 7, p. 4.' Corrected to _See
+      nn. 6 and 7, p. 33._
+
+      Footnote 20, Chapter 3. 'Supra, p. 4.' Corrected to _Supra, p. 33._
+
+      Index entry 'Economic institutions'. There is no index entry for
+      '_Farming_', however the main references to farming can found in
+      Chapter Four.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Fair Play Settlers of the West
+Branch Valley, 1769-1784, by George D. Wolf
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIR PLAY SETTLERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 22471.txt or 22471.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        http://www.gutenberg.org/2/2/4/7/22471/
+
+Produced by Greg Weeks, Stephen Blundell and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/22471.zip b/22471.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bb2e7e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/22471.zip
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4af197
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #22471 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/22471)