diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-0.txt | 1999 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-0.zip | bin | 0 -> 38254 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-8.txt | 1999 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 38107 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 359478 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/21978-h.htm | 2309 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/diagram_large.png | bin | 0 -> 55123 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/diagram_small.png | bin | 0 -> 21796 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig01.png | bin | 0 -> 7780 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig02.png | bin | 0 -> 7035 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig03.png | bin | 0 -> 7855 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig04.png | bin | 0 -> 10002 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig05.png | bin | 0 -> 7363 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig06.png | bin | 0 -> 4851 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig07.png | bin | 0 -> 2251 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig08.png | bin | 0 -> 8183 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig09.png | bin | 0 -> 5634 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig10.png | bin | 0 -> 3890 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig11.png | bin | 0 -> 3048 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig12.png | bin | 0 -> 2117 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig13.png | bin | 0 -> 2908 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig14.png | bin | 0 -> 5245 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig15.png | bin | 0 -> 9022 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig16.png | bin | 0 -> 4108 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig17.png | bin | 0 -> 7206 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig18.png | bin | 0 -> 7432 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig19.png | bin | 0 -> 6331 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig20.png | bin | 0 -> 1917 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig21.png | bin | 0 -> 2206 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig22.png | bin | 0 -> 4635 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig23.png | bin | 0 -> 2932 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig24.png | bin | 0 -> 7887 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig25.png | bin | 0 -> 6491 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig26.png | bin | 0 -> 4567 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig27.png | bin | 0 -> 4497 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/fig28.png | bin | 0 -> 9851 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/frontis.jpg | bin | 0 -> 51411 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-h/images/il049.png | bin | 0 -> 27211 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f001-image.jpg | bin | 0 -> 425759 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f001.png | bin | 0 -> 90710 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f002.png | bin | 0 -> 12063 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f003.png | bin | 0 -> 55884 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f004.png | bin | 0 -> 62895 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f005.png | bin | 0 -> 59668 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/f006.png | bin | 0 -> 59719 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p007.png | bin | 0 -> 58241 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p008.png | bin | 0 -> 63736 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p009.png | bin | 0 -> 39044 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p009a-image.png | bin | 0 -> 59714 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p009b-image.png | bin | 0 -> 65467 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p010-image.png | bin | 0 -> 898696 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p010.png | bin | 0 -> 53428 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p011.png | bin | 0 -> 64695 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p012-image.png | bin | 0 -> 733331 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p012.png | bin | 0 -> 54435 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p013.png | bin | 0 -> 61928 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p014-image.png | bin | 0 -> 960494 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p014.png | bin | 0 -> 52211 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p015-image.png | bin | 0 -> 899524 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p015.png | bin | 0 -> 51069 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p016-image.png | bin | 0 -> 708276 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p016.png | bin | 0 -> 53870 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p017-image.png | bin | 0 -> 318917 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p017.png | bin | 0 -> 49809 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p018.png | bin | 0 -> 62279 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p019-image.png | bin | 0 -> 458794 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p019.png | bin | 0 -> 46395 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p020-image.png | bin | 0 -> 491469 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p020.png | bin | 0 -> 53309 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p021.png | bin | 0 -> 30734 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p021a-image.png | bin | 0 -> 824231 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p021b-image.png | bin | 0 -> 375664 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p022-image.png | bin | 0 -> 907700 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p022.png | bin | 0 -> 45318 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p023-image.png | bin | 0 -> 342564 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p023.png | bin | 0 -> 46780 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p024-image.png | bin | 0 -> 331917 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p024.png | bin | 0 -> 47829 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p025.png | bin | 0 -> 60058 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p026.png | bin | 0 -> 60290 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p027-image.png | bin | 0 -> 597723 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p027.png | bin | 0 -> 43734 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p028.png | bin | 0 -> 62843 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p029.png | bin | 0 -> 59978 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p030.png | bin | 0 -> 63365 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p031-image.png | bin | 0 -> 270937 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p031.png | bin | 0 -> 48065 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p032.png | bin | 0 -> 64329 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p033-image.png | bin | 0 -> 230352 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p033.png | bin | 0 -> 47150 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p034-image.png | bin | 0 -> 513924 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p034.png | bin | 0 -> 39322 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p035.png | bin | 0 -> 64932 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p036-image.png | bin | 0 -> 326960 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p036.png | bin | 0 -> 51047 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p037.png | bin | 0 -> 61892 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p038.png | bin | 0 -> 63972 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p039-image.png | bin | 0 -> 695338 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p039.png | bin | 0 -> 40766 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p040.png | bin | 0 -> 63102 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p041.png | bin | 0 -> 63475 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p042.png | bin | 0 -> 60799 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p043.png | bin | 0 -> 60604 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p044-image.png | bin | 0 -> 400918 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p044.png | bin | 0 -> 33541 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p045.png | bin | 0 -> 65795 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p046-image.png | bin | 0 -> 898648 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p046.png | bin | 0 -> 48940 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p047.png | bin | 0 -> 63822 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p048-image.png | bin | 0 -> 1149001 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p048.png | bin | 0 -> 48352 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p049.png | bin | 0 -> 63429 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p050.png | bin | 0 -> 61466 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p051.png | bin | 0 -> 60528 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p052.png | bin | 0 -> 65530 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p053.png | bin | 0 -> 57864 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p054.png | bin | 0 -> 62910 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p055.png | bin | 0 -> 61151 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p056.png | bin | 0 -> 63425 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978-page-images/p057.png | bin | 0 -> 64059 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978.txt | 2009 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 21978.zip | bin | 0 -> 38060 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
125 files changed, 8332 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/21978-0.txt b/21978-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3becab4 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1999 @@ +Project Gutenberg's An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by H. R. Playtner + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: An Analysis of the Lever Escapement + +Author: H. R. Playtner + +Release Date: June 30, 2007 [EBook #21978] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT *** + + + + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + + +[Illustration: THOMAS MUDGE + +_The first Horologist who successfully applied the Detached Lever +Escapement to Watches._ + +_Born 1715--Died 1794._] + + + + +AN ANALYSIS + +OF THE + +LEVER ESCAPEMENT + +BY H. R. PLAYTNER. + +A LECTURE DELIVERED BEFORE THE CANADIAN WATCHMAKERS' AND RETAIL +JEWELERS' ASSOCIATION. + +ILLUSTRATED. + +CHICAGO: + +HAZLITT & WALKER, PUBLISHERS. + +1910. + + + + +PREFACE. + + +Before entering upon our subject proper, we think it advisable to +explain a few points, simple though they are, which might cause +confusion to some readers. Our experience has shown us that as soon as +we use the words "millimeter" and "degree," perplexity is the result. +"What is a millimeter?" is propounded to us very often in the course of +a year; nearly every new acquaintance is interested in having the metric +system of measurement, together with the fine gauges used, explained to +him. + +The metric system of measurement originated at the time of the French +Revolution, in the latter part of the 18th century; its divisions are +decimal, just the same as the system of currency we use in this country. + +A meter is the ten millionth part of an arc of the meridian of Paris, +drawn from the equator to the north pole; as compared with the English +inch there are 39+3708/10000 inches in a meter, and there are +25.4 millimeters in an inch. + +The meter is sub-divided into decimeters, centimeters and millimeters; +1,000 millimeters equal one meter; the millimeter is again divided into +10ths and the 10ths into 100ths of a millimeter, which could be +continued indefinitely. The 1/100 millimeter is equal to the 1/2540 of +an inch. These are measurements with which the watchmaker is concerned. +1/100 millimeter, written .01 mm., is the side shake for a balance +pivot; multiply it by 2¼ and we obtain the thickness for the spring +detent of a pocket chronometer, which is about â…“ the thickness of a +human hair. + +The metric system of measurement is used in all the watch factories of +Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United States, and nearly all the +lathe makers number their chucks by it, and some of them cut the leading +screws on their slide rests to it. + +In any modern work on horology of value, the metric system is used. +Skilled horologists use it on account of its _convenience_. The +millimeter is a unit which can be handled on the small parts of a watch, +whereas the inch must always be divided on anything smaller than the +plates. + +Equally as fine gauges can be and are made for the inch as for the +metric system, and the inch is decimally divided, but we require another +decimal point to express our measurement. + +Metric gauges can now be procured from the material shops; they consist +of tenth measures, verniers and micrometers; the finer ones of these +come from Glashutte, and are the ones mentioned by Grossmann in his +essay on the lever escapement. Any workman who has once used these +instruments could not be persuaded to do without them. + +No one can comprehend the geometrical principles employed in escapements +without a knowledge of angles and their measurements, therefore we deem +it of sufficient importance to at least explain what a degree is, as we +know for a fact, that young workmen especially, often fail to see how to +apply it. + +Every circle, no matter how large or small it may be, contains 360°; a +degree is therefore the 360th part of a circle; it is divided into +minutes, seconds, thirds, etc. + +To measure the _value_ of a degree of any circle, we must multiply the +diameter of it by 3.1416, which gives us the circumference, and then +divide it by 360. It will be seen that it depends on the size of that +circle or its radius, as to the value of a degree in any _actual_ +measurement. To illustrate; a degree on the earth's circumference +measures 60 geographical miles, while measured on the circumference of +an escape wheel 7.5 mm. in diameter, or as they would designate it in a +material shop, No. 7½, it would be 7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 = .0655 mm., which +is equal to the breadth of an ordinary human hair; it is a degree in +both cases, but the difference is very great, therefore a degree cannot +be associated with any actual measurement until the radius of the +circle is known. Degrees are generated from the center of the circle, +and should be thought of as to ascension or direction and relative +value. Circles contain four right angles of 90° each. Degrees are +commonly measured by means of the protractor, although the ordinary +instruments of this kind leave very much to be desired. The lines can be +verified by means of the compass, which is a good practical method. + +It may also be well to give an explanation of some of the terms used. + +_Drop_ equals the amount of freedom which is allowed for the action of +pallets and wheel. See Z, Fig. 1. + +_Primitive or Geometrical Diameter._--In the ratchet tooth or English +wheel, the primitive and real diameter are equal; in the club tooth +wheel it means across the locking corners of the teeth; in such a wheel, +therefore, the primitive is _less_ than the real diameter by the height +of two impulse planes. + +_Lock_ equals the depth of locking, measured from the locking corner of +the pallet at the moment the drop has occurred. + +_Run_ equals the amount of angular motion of pallets and fork to the +bankings _after_ the drop has taken place. + +_Total Lock_ equals lock plus run. + +A _Tangent_ is a line which _touches_ a curve, but does not intersect +it. AC and AD, Figs. 2 and 3, are tangents to the primitive circle GH at +the points of intersection of EB, AC, and GH and FB, AD and GH. + +_Impulse Angle_ equals the angular connection of the impulse or ruby pin +with the lever fork; or in other words, of the balance with the +escapement. + +_Impulse Radius._--From the face of the impulse jewel to the center of +motion, which is in the balance staff, most writers assume the impulse +angle and radius to be equal, and it is true that they must conform with +one another. We have made a radical change in the radius and one which +does not affect the angle. We shall prove this in due time, and also +that the wider the impulse pin the greater must the impulse radius be, +although the angle will remain unchanged. + +Right here we wish to put in a word of advice to all young men, and that +is to learn to draw. No one can be a thorough watchmaker unless he can +draw, because he cannot comprehend his trade unless he can do so. + +We know what it has done for us, and we have noticed the same results +with others, therefore we speak from personal experience. Attend night +schools and mechanic's institutes and improve yourselves. + +The young workmen of Toronto have a great advantage in the Toronto +Technical School, but we are sorry to see that out of some 600 students, +only five watchmakers attended last year. We can account for the +majority of them, so it would seem as if the young men of the trade were +not much interested, or thought they could not apply the knowledge to be +gained there. This is a great mistake; we might almost say that +knowledge of any kind can be applied to horology. The young men who take +up these studies, will see the great advantage of them later on; one +workman will labor intelligently and the other do blind "guess" work. + +We are now about to enter upon our subject and deem it well to say, we +have endeavored to make it as plain as possible. It is a deep subject +and is difficult to treat lightly; we will treat it in our own way, +paying special attention to all these points which bothered us during +the many years of painstaking study which we gave to the subject. We +especially endeavor to point out how theory can be applied to practice; +while we cannot expect that everyone will understand the subject without +study, we think we have made it comparatively easy of comprehension. + +We will give our method of drafting the escapement, which happens in +some respects to differ from others. We believe in making a drawing +which we can reproduce in a watch. + + + + +AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT. + + +The lever escapement is derived from Graham's dead-beat escapement for +clocks. Thomas Mudge was the first horologist who successfully applied +it to watches in the detached form, about 1750. The locking faces of the +pallets were arcs of circles struck from the pallet centers. Many +improvements were made upon it until to-day it is the best form of +escapement for a general purpose watch, and when made on mechanical +principles is capable of producing first rate results. + +Our object will be to explain the whys and wherefores of this +escapement, and we will at once begin with the number of teeth in the +escape wheel. It is not obligatory in the lever, as in the verge, to +have an uneven number of teeth in the wheel. While nearly all have 15 +teeth, we might make them of 14 or 16; occasionally we find some in +complicated watches of 12 teeth, and in old English watches, of 30, +which is a clumsy arrangement, and if the pallets embrace only three +teeth in the latter, the pallet center cannot be pitched on a tangent. + +Although advisable from a timing standpoint that the teeth in the escape +wheel should divide evenly into the number of beats made per minute in a +watch with seconds hand, it is not, strictly speaking, necessary that it +should do so, as an example will show. We will take an ordinary watch, +beating 300 times per minute; we will fit an escape wheel of 16 teeth; +multiply this by 2, as there is a forward and then a return motion of +the balance and consequently two beats for each tooth, making +16 × 2 = 32 beats for each revolution of the escape wheel. 300 beats are +made per minute; divide this by the beats made on each revolution, and +we have the number of times in which the escape wheel revolves per +minute, namely, 300 ÷ 32 = 9.375. This number then is the proportion +existing for the teeth and pitch diameters of the 4th wheel and escape +pinion. We must now find a suitable number of teeth for this wheel and +pinion. Of available pinions for a watch, the only one which would +answer would be one of 8 leaves, as any other number would give a +fractional number of teeth for the 4th wheel, therefore 9.375 × 8 = 75 +teeth in 4th wheel. Now as to the proof: as is well known, if we +multiply the number of teeth contained in 4th and escape wheels also by +2, for the reason previously given, and divide by the leaves in the +escape pinion, we get the number of beats made per minute; therefore +(75 × 16 × 2)/8 = 300 beats per minute. + +Pallets can be made to embrace more than three teeth, but would be much +heavier and therefore the mechanical action would suffer. They can also +be made to embrace fewer teeth, but the necessary side shake in the +pivot holes would prove very detrimental to a total lifting angle of +10°, which represents the angle of movement in modern watches. Some of +the finest ones only make 8 or 9° of a movement; the smaller the angle +the greater will the effects of defective workmanship be; 10° is a +common-sense angle and gives a safe escapement capable of fine results. +Theoretically, if a timepiece could be produced in which the balance +would vibrate without being connected with an escapement, we would have +reached a step nearer the goal. Practice has shown this to be the proper +theory to work on. Hence, the smaller the pallet and impulse angles the +less will the balance and escapement be connected. The chronometer is +still more highly detached than the lever. + +The pallet embracing three teeth is sound and practical, and when +applied to a 15 tooth wheel, this arrangement offers certain geometrical +and mechanical advantages in its construction, which we will notice in +due time. 15 teeth divide evenly into 360° leaving an interval of 24° +from tooth to tooth, which is also the angle at which the locking faces +of the teeth are inclined from the center, which fact will be found +convenient when we come to cut our wheel. + +From locking to locking on the pallet scaping over three teeth, the +angle is 60°, which is equal to 2½ spaces of the wheel. Fig. 1 +illustrates the lockings, spanning this arc. If the pallets embraced 4 +teeth, the angle would be 84°; or in case of a 16 tooth wheel scaping +over three teeth, the angle would be 360 × 2.5/16 = 56¼°. + +[Illustration: Fig. 1.] + +Pallets may be divided into two kinds, namely: equidistant and circular. +The equidistant pallet is so-called because the lockings are an equal +distance from the center; sometimes it is also called the tangential +escapement, on account of the unlocking taking place on the intersection +of tangent AC with EB, and FB with AD, the tangents, which is the +valuable feature of this form of escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +AC and AD, Fig. 2, are tangents to the primitive circle GH. ABE and ABF +are angles of 30° each, together therefore forming the angle FBE of +60°. The locking circle MN is struck from the pallet center A; the +interangles being equal, consequently the pallets must be equidistant. + +The weak point of this pallet is that the lifting is not performed so +favorably; by examining the lifting planes MO and NP, we see that the +discharging edge, O, is closer to the center, A, than the discharging +edge, P; consequently the lifting on the engaging pallet is performed on +a shorter lever arm than on the disengaging pallet, also any inequality +in workmanship would prove more detrimental on the engaging than on the +disengaging pallet. The equidistant pallet requires fine workmanship +throughout. We have purposely shown it of a width of 10°, which is the +widest we can employ in a 15 tooth wheel, and shows the defects of this +escapement more readily than if we had used a narrow pallet. A narrower +pallet is advisable, as the difference in the discharging edges will be +less, and the lifting arms would, therefore, not show so much difference +in leverage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +The circular pallet is sometimes appropriately called "the pallet with +equal lifts," as the lever arms AMO and ANP, Fig. 3, are equal lengths. +It will be noticed by examining the diagram, that the pallets are +bisected by the 30° lines EB and FB, one-half their width being placed +on each side of these lines. In this pallet we have two locking circles, +MP for the engaging pallet, and NO for the disengaging pallet. The weak +points in this escapement are that the unlocking resistance is greater +on the engaging than on the disengaging pallet, and that neither of them +lock on the tangents AC and AD, at the points of intersection with EB +and FB. The narrower the circular pallet is made, the nearer to the +tangent will the unlocking be performed. In neither the equidistant or +circular pallets can the unlocking resistance be _exactly_ the same on +each pallet, as in the engaging pallet the friction takes place before +AB, the line of centers, which is more severe than when this line has +been passed, as is the case with the disengaging pallet; this fact +proportionately increases the existing defects of the circular over the +equidistant pallet, and _vice versa_, but for the same reason, the +lifting in the equidistant is proportionately accompanied by more +friction than in the circular. + +Both equidistant and circular pallets have their adherents; the finest +Swiss, French and German watches are made with equidistant escapements, +while the majority of English and American watches contain the circular. +In our opinion the English are wise in adhering to the circular form. We +think a ratchet wheel should not be employed with equidistant pallets. +By examining Fig. 2, we see an English pallet of this form. We have +shown its defects in such a wide pallet as the English (as we have +before stated), because they are more readily perceived; also, on +account of the shape of the teeth, there is danger of the discharging +edge, P, dipping so deep into the wheel, as to make considerable drop +necessary, or the pallets would touch on the backs of the teeth. In the +case of the club tooth, the latter is hollowed out, therefore, less drop +is required. We have noticed that theoretically, it is advantageous to +make the pallets narrower than the English, both for the equidistant and +circular escapements. There is an escapement, Fig. 4, which is just the +opposite to the English. The entire lift is performed by the wheel, +while in the case of the ratchet wheel, the entire lifting angle is on +the pallets; also, the pallets being as narrow as they can be made, +consistent with strength, it has the good points of both the equidistant +and circular pallets, as the unlocking can be performed on the tangent +and the lifting arms are of equal length. The wheel, however, is so much +heavier as to considerably increase the inertia; also, we have a metal +surface of quite an extent sliding over a thin jewel. For practical +reasons, therefore, it has been slightly altered in form and is only +used in cheap work, being easily made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +We will now consider the drop, which is a clear loss of power, and, if +excessive, is the cause of much irregularity. It should be as small as +possible consistent with perfect freedom of action. + +In so far as _angular_ measurements are concerned, no hard and fast rule +can be applied to it, the larger the escape wheel the smaller should be +the angle allowed for drop. Authorities on the subject allow 1½° drop +for the club and 2° for the ratchet tooth. It is a fact that escape +wheels are not cut perfectly true; the teeth are apt to bend slightly +from the action of the cutters. The truest wheel can be made of steel, +as each tooth can be successively ground after being hardened and +tempered. Such a wheel would require less drop than one of any other +metal. Supposing we have a wheel with a primitive diameter of 7.5 mm., +what is the amount of drop, allowing 1½° by angular measurement? +7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .0983 mm., which is sufficient; a hair could +get between the pallet and tooth, and would not stop the watch. Even +after allowing for imperfectly divided teeth, we require no greater +freedom even if the wheel is larger. Now suppose we take a wheel +with a primitive diameter of 8.5 mm. and find the amount of drop; +8.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .1413 mm., or .1413 - .0983 = .043 mm., +more drop than the smaller wheel, if we take the same angle. This is a +waste of force. The angular drop should, therefore, be proportioned +according to the size of the wheel. We wish it to be understood that +common sense must always be our guide. When the horological student once +arrives at this standpoint, he can _intelligently_ apply himself to his +calling. + +_The Draw._--The draw or draft angle was added to the pallets in order +to draw the fork back against the bankings and the guard point from the +roller whenever the safety action had performed its function. + +[Illustration: Fig. 5.] + +Pallets with draw are more difficult to unlock than those without it, +this is in the nature of a fault, but whenever there are two faults we +must choose the less. The rate of the watch will suffer less on account +of the recoil introduced than it would were the locking faces arcs of +circles struck from the pallet center, in which case the guard point +would often remain against the roller. The draw should be as light as +possible consistent with safety of action; some writers allow 15° on the +engaging and 12° on the disengaging pallet; others again allow 12° on +each, which we deem sufficient. The draw is measured from the locking +edges M and N, Fig. 5. The locking planes _when locked_ are inclined 12° +from EB, and FB. In the case of the engaging pallet it inclines toward +the center A. The draw is produced on account of MA being longer than +RA, consequently, when power is applied to the scape tooth S, the pallet +is drawn into the wheel. The disengaging pallet inclines in the same +direction but away from the center A; the reason is obvious from the +former explanation. Some people imagine that the greater the incline on +the locking edge of the escape teeth, the stronger the draw would be. +This is not the case, but it is certainly necessary that the point of +the tooth alone should touch the pallet. From this it follows that the +angle on the teeth must be greater than on the pallets; examine the +disengaging pallet in Fig. 5, as it is from this pallet that the +inclination of the teeth must be determined, as in the case of the +engaging pallet the motion is toward the line of centers AB, and +therefore _away_ from the tooth, which partially explains why some +people advocate 15° draw for this pallet. As illustrated in the case of +the disengaging pallet, however, the motion is also towards the line of +centers AB, and _towards_ the tooth as well, all of which will be seen +by the dotted circles MM2 and NN2, representing the paths of the +pallets. It will be noticed that UNF and BNB are opposite and equal +angles of 12°. For practical reasons, from a manufacturing standpoint, +the angle on the tooth is made just twice the amount, namely 24°; we +could make it a little less or a little more. If we made it less than +20° too great a surface would be in contact with the jewel, involving +greater friction in unlocking and an inefficient draw, but in the case +of an English lever with such an arrangement we could do with less +drop, which advantage would be too dearly bought; or if the angle is +made over 28°, the point or locking edge of the tooth would rapidly +become worn in case of a brass wheel. Also in an English lever more drop +would be required. + +_The Lock._--What we have said in regard to drop also applies to the +lock, which should be as small as possible, consistent with perfect +safety. The greater the drop the deeper must be the lock; 1½° is the +angle generally allowed for the lock, but it is obvious that in a large +escapement it can be less. + +[Illustration: Fig. 6.] + +_The Run._--The run or, as it is sometimes called, "the slide," should +also be as light as possible; from ¼° to ½° is sufficient. It follows +then, the bankings should be as close together as possible, consistent +with requisite freedom for escaping. Anything more than this increases +the angular connection of the balance with the escapement, which +directly violates the theory under which it is constructed; also, a +greater amount of work will be imposed upon the balance to meet the +increased unlocking resistance, resulting in a poor motion and accurate +time will be out of the question. It will be seen that those workmen who +make a practice of opening the banks, "to give the escapement more +freedom" simply jump from the frying pan into the fire. The bankings +should be as far removed from the pallet center as possible, as the +further away they are pitched the less run we require, according to +angular measurement. Figure 6 illustrates this fact; the tooth S has +just dropped on the engaging pallet, but the fork has not yet reached +the bankings. At _a_ we have 1° of run, while if placed at _b_ we would +only have ½° of run, but still the same freedom for escaping, and less +unlocking resistance. + +The bankings should be placed towards the acting end of the fork as +illustrated, as in case the watch "rebanks" there would be more strain +on the lever pivots if they were placed at the other end of the fork. + +[Illustration: Fig. 7.] + +_The Lift._--The lift is composed of the actual lift on the teeth and +pallets and the lock and run. We will suppose that from drop to drop we +allow 10°; if the lock is 1½° then the actual lift by means of the +inclined planes on teeth and pallets will be 8½°. We have seen that a +small lifting angle is advisable, so that the vibrations of the balance +will be as free as possible. There are other reasons as well. Fig. 7 +shows two inclined planes; we desire to lift the weight 2 a distance +equal to the angle at which the planes are inclined; it will be seen at +a glance that we will have less friction by employing the smaller +incline, whereas with the larger one the motive power is employed +through a greater distance on the object to be moved. The smaller the +angle the more energetic will the movement be; the grinding of the +angles and fit of the pivots, etc., also increases in importance. An +actual lift of 8½° satisfies the conditions imposed very well. We have +before seen that both on account of the unlocking and the lifting +leverage of the pallet arms, it would be advisable to make them narrow +both in the equidistant and circular escapement. We will now study the +question from the standpoint of the lift, in so far as the wheel is +concerned. + +[Illustration: Fig. 8.] + +It is self-evident that a narrow pallet requires a wide tooth, and a +wide pallet a narrow or thin tooth wheel; in the ratchet wheel we have a +metal point passing over a jeweled plane. The friction is at its +minimum, because there is less adhesion than with the club tooth, but we +must emphasize the fact that we require a greater angle in proportion on +the pallets in this escapement than with the narrow pallets and wider +tooth. This seems to be a point which many do not thoroughly comprehend, +and we would advise a close study of Fig. 8, which will make it +perfectly clear, as we show both a wide and a narrow pallet. GH, +represents the primitive, which in this figure is also the real diameter +of the escape wheel. In measuring the lifting angles for the pallets, +our starting point is _always_ from the tangents AC and AD. The tangents +are straight lines, but the wheel describes the circle GH, therefore +they must deviate from one another, and the closer to the center A the +discharging edge of the engaging pallet reaches, the greater does this +difference become; and in the same manner the further the discharging +edge of the disengaging pallet is from the center A the greater it is. +This shows that the loss is greater in the equidistant than in the +circular escapement. After this we will designate this difference as +the "loss." In order to illustrate it more plainly we show the widest +pallet--the English--in equidistant form. This gives another reason why +the English lever should only be made with circular pallets, as we have +seen that the wider the pallet the greater the loss. The loss is +measured at the intersection of the path of the discharging edge OO, +with the circle G H, and is shown through AC2, which intersects these +circles at that point. In the case of the disengaging pallet, PP +illustrates the path of the discharging edge; the loss is measured as in +the preceding case where GH is intersected as shown by AD2. It amounts +to a different value on each pallet. Notice the loss between C and C2, +on the engaging, and D and D2 on the disengaging pallet; it is greater +on the engaging pallet, so much so that it amounts to 2°, which is equal +to the entire lock; therefore if 8½° of work is to be accomplished +through this pallet, the lifting plane requires an angle of 10½° struck +from AC. + +Let us now consider the lifting action of the club tooth wheel. This is +decidedly a complicated action, and requires some study to comprehend. +In action with the engaging pallet the wheel moves _up_, or in the +direction of the motion of the pallets, but on the disengaging pallet it +moves _down_, and in a direction opposite to the pallets, and the heel +of the tooth moves with greater velocity than the locking edge; also in +the case of the engaging pallet, the locking edge moves with greater +velocity than the discharging edge; in the disengaging pallet the +opposite is the case, as the discharging edge moves with greater +velocity than the locking. These points involve factors which must be +considered, and the drafting of a correct action is of paramount +importance; we therefore show the lift as it is accomplished in four +different stages in a good action. Fig. 9 illustrates the engaging, and +Fig. 10 the disengaging pallet; by comparing the figures it will be +noticed that the lift takes place on the point of the tooth similar to +the English, until the discharging edge of the pallet has been passed, +when the heel gradually comes into play on the engaging, but more +quickly on the disengaging pallet. + +We will also notice that during the first part of the lift the tooth +moves faster along the engaging lifting plane than on the disengaging; +on pallets 2 and 3 this difference is quite large; towards the latter +part of the lift the action becomes quicker on the disengaging pallet +and slower on the engaging. + +To obviate this difficulty some fine watches, notably those of A. Lange +& Sons, have convex lifting planes on the engaging and concave on the +disengaging pallets; the lifting planes on the teeth are also curved. +See Fig. 11. This is decidedly an ingenious arrangement, and is in +strict accordance with scientific investigation. We should see many fine +watches made with such escapements if the means for producing them could +fully satisfy the requirements of the scientific principles involved. + +[Illustration: Fig. 9.] + +The distribution of the lift on tooth and pallet is a very important +matter; the lifting angle on the tooth must be _less_ in proportion to +its width than it is on the pallet. For the sake of making it perfectly +plain, we illustrate what should not be made; if we have 10½° for width +of tooth and pallet, and take half of it for a tooth, and the other +half for the pallet, making each of them 5¼° in width, and suppose we +have a lifting of 8½° to distribute between them, by allowing 4¼° on +each, the lift would take place as shown in Fig. 12, which is a very +unfavorable action. The edge of the engaging pallet scrapes on the +lifting plane of the tooth, yet it is astonishing to find some otherwise +very fine watches being manufactured right along which contain this +fault; such watches can be stopped with the ruby pin in the fork and the +engaging pallet in action, nor would they start when run down as soon as +the crown is touched, no matter how well they were finished and fitted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 10.] + +The lever lengths of the club tooth are variable, while with the ratchet +they are constant, which is in its favor; in the latter it would always +be as SB, Fig. 13. This is a shorter lever than QB, consequently more +powerful, although the greater velocity is at Q, which only comes into +action after the inertia of wheel and pallets has been overcome, and +when the greatest momentum during contact is reached. SB is the +primitive radius of the club tooth wheel, but both primitive and _real_ +radius of the ratchet wheel. The distance of centers of wheel and pallet +will be alike in both cases; also the lockings will be the same distance +apart on both pallets; therefore, when horologists, even if they have +worldwide reputations, claim that the club tooth has an advantage over +the ratchet because it begins the lift with a shorter lever than the +latter, it does not make it so. We are treating the subject from a +purely horological standpoint, and neither patriotism or prejudice has +anything to do with it. We wish to sift the matter thoroughly and arrive +at a just conception of the merits and defects of each form of +escapement, and show _reasons_ for our conclusions. + +[Illustration: Fig. 11.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 12.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 13.] + +Anyone who has closely followed our deductions must see that in so far +as the wheel is concerned the ratchet or English wheel has several +points in its favor. Such a wheel is inseparable from a wide pallet; but +we have seen that a narrower pallet is advisable; also as little drop +and lock as possible; clearly, we must effect a compromise. In other +words, so far the balance of our reasoning is in favor of the club tooth +escapement and to effect an intelligent division of angles for tooth, +pallet and lift is one of the great questions which confronts the +intelligent horologist. + +Anyone who has ever taken the pains to draw pallet and tooth with +different angles, through every stage of the lift, with both wide and +narrow pallets and teeth, in circular and equidistant escapements, will +have received an eye-opener. We strongly advise all our readers who are +practical workmen to try it after studying what we have said. We are +certain it will repay them. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +_The Center Distance of Wheel and Pallets._ The direction of pressure of +the wheel teeth should be through the pallet center by drawing the +tangents AC and AD, Fig. 2 to the primitive circle GH, at the +intersection of the angle FBE. This condition is realized in the +equidistant pallet. In the circular pallet, Fig. 3, this condition +cannot exist, as in order _to lock_ on a tangent the center distance +should be _greater_ for the engaging and _less_ for the disengaging +pallet, therefore watchmakers aim to go between the two and plant them +as before specified at A. + +When planted on the tangents the unlocking resistance will be less and +the impulse transmitted under favorable conditions, especially so in +the circular, as the direction of pressure coincides (close to the +center of the lift), with the law of the parallelogram of forces. + +It is _impossible_ to plant pallets on the tangents in very small +escapements, as there would not be enough room for a pallet arbor of +proper strength, nor will they be found planted on the tangents in the +medium size escapement with a long pallet arbor, nor in such a one with +a very wide tooth (see Fig. 4) as the heel would come so close to the +center A, that the solidity of pallets and arbor would suffer. We will +give an actual example. For a medium sized escape wheel with a primitive +diameter of 7.5 mm., the center distance AB is 4.33 mm. By using 3° of a +lifting angle on the teeth, the distance from the heel of the tooth to +the pallet center will be .4691 mm.; by allowing .1 mm. between wheel +and pallet and .15 mm. for stock on the pallets we find we will have a +pallet arbor as follows: .4691 - (.1 + .15) × 2 = .4382 mm. It would not +be practicable to make anything smaller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +It behooves us now to see that while a narrow pallet is advisable a very +wide tooth is not; yet these two are inseparable. Here is another case +for a compromise, as, unquestionably the pallets ought to be planted on +the tangents. There is no difficulty about it in the English lever, and +we have shown in our example that a judiciously planned club tooth +escapement of medium size can be made with the center distance properly +planted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +When considering the center distance we must of necessity consider the +widths of teeth and pallets and their lifting angles. We are now at a +point in which no watchmaker of intelligence would indicate one certain +division for these parts and claim it to be "the best." It is always +those who do not thoroughly understand a subject who are the first to +make such claims. We will, however, give our opinion within certain +limits. The angle to be divided for tooth and pallet is 10½°. Let us +divide it by 2, which would be the most natural thing to do, and examine +the problem. We will have 5¼° each for width of tooth and pallet. We +_must_ have a smaller lifting angle on the tooth than on the pallet, but +the wider the tooth the greater should its lifting angle be. It would +not be mechanical to make the tooth wide and the lifting angle small, as +the lifting plane on the pallets would be too steep on account of being +narrow. A lifting angle on the tooth which would be _exactly_ suitable +for a given circular, would be _too great_ for a given equidistant +pallet. It follows, therefore, taking 5¼° as a width for the tooth, that +while we could employ it in a fair sized escapement with equidistant +pallets, we could not do so with circular pallets and still have the +latter pitched on the tangents. We see the majority of escapements made +with narrower teeth than pallets, and for a very good reason. + +In the example previously given, the 3° lift on the tooth is well +adapted for a width of 4½°, which would require a pallet 6° in width. +The tooth, therefore, would be ¾ the width of pallets, which is very +good indeed. + +From what we have said it follows that a large number of pallets are not +planted on the tangents at all. We have never noticed this question in +print before. Writers generally seem to, in fact do, assume that no +matter how large or small the escapement may be, or how the pallets and +teeth are divided for width and lifting angle, no difficulty will be +found in locating the pallets on the tangents. Theoretically there is no +difficulty, but in practice we find there is. + +_Equidistant vs. Circular._ At this stage we are able to weigh the +circular against the equidistant pallet. In beginning this essay we had +to explain the difference between them, so the reader could follow our +discussion, and not until now, are we able to sum up our conclusions. + +The reader will have noticed that for such an important action as the +lift, which supplies power to the balance, the circular pallet is +favored from every point of view. This is a very strong point in its +favor. On the other hand, the unlocking resistance being less, and as +nearly alike as possible on both pallets in the equidistant, it is a +question if the total vibration of the balance will be greater with the +one than the other, although it will receive the impulse under better +conditions from the circular pallet; but it expends more force in +unlocking it. Escapement friction plays an important role in the +position and isochronal adjustments; the greater the friction +encountered the slower the vibration of the balance. The friction should +be constant. In unlocking, the equidistant comes nearer to fulfilling +this condition, while during the lift it is more nearly so in the +circular. The friction in unlocking, from a timing standpoint, +overshadows that of the impulse, and the tooth can be a little wider in +the equidistant than the circular escapement with the pallet properly +planted. Therefore for the _finest_ watches the equidistant escapement +is well adapted, but for anything less than that the circular should be +our choice. + +_The Fork and Roller Action._ While the lifting action of the lever +escapement corresponds to that of the cylinder, the fork and roller +action corresponds to the impulse action in the chronometer and duplex +escapements. + +Our experience leads us to believe that the action now under +consideration is but imperfectly understood by many workmen. It is a +complicated action, and when out of order is the cause of many annoying +stoppages, often characterized by the watch starting when taken from the +pocket. + +The action is very important and is generally divided into impulse and +safety action, although we think we ought to divide it into three, +namely, by adding that of the unlocking action. We will first of all +consider the impulse and unlocking actions, because we cannot +intelligently consider the one without the other, as the ruby pin and +the slot in the fork are utilized in each. The ruby pin, or strictly +speaking, the "impulse radius," is a lever arm, whose length is measured +from the center of the balance staff to the face of the ruby pin, and is +used, firstly, as a power or transmitting lever on the acting or +geometrical length of the fork (_i. e._, from the pallet center to the +beginning of the horn), and which at the moment is a resistance lever, +to be utilized in unlocking the pallets. After the pallets are unlocked +the conditions are reversed, and we now find the lever fork, through the +pallets, transmitting power to the balance by means of the impulse +radius. In the first part of the action we have a short lever engaging a +longer one, which is an advantage. See Fig. 14, where we have purposely +somewhat exaggerated the conditions. A′X represents the impulse radius +at present under discussion, and AW the acting length of the fork. It +will be seen that the shorter the impulse radius, or in other words, the +closer the ruby pin is to the balance staff and the longer the fork, the +easier will the unlocking of the pallets be performed, but this entails +a great impulse angle, for the law applicable to the case is, that the +angles are in the inverse ratio to the radii. In other words, the +shorter the radius, the greater is the angle, and the smaller the angle +the greater is the radius. We know, though, that we must have as small +an impulse angle as possible in order that the balance should be highly +detached. Here is one point in favor of a short impulse radius, and one +against it. Now, let us turn to the impulse action. Here we have the +long lever AW acting on a short one, A′X, which is a disadvantage. Here, +then, we ought to try and have a short lever acting on a long one, which +would point to a short fork and a great impulse radius. Suppose AP, +Fig. 14, is the length of fork, and A′P is the impulse radius; here, +then, we favor the impulse, and it is directly in accordance with the +theory of the free vibration of the balance, for, as before stated, the +longer the radius the smaller the angle. The action at P is also closer +to the line of centers than it is at W, which is another advantage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +We will notice that by employing a large impulse angle, and consequently +a short radius, the intersection _m_ of the two circles _ii_ and _cc_ is +very _safe_, whereas, with the conditions reversed in favor of the +impulse action, the intersection at _k_ is more delicate. We have now +seen enough to appreciate the fact that we favor one action at the +expense of another. + +By having a lifting angle on pallet and tooth of 8½°, a locking angle of +1½°, and a run of ½°, we will have an angular movement of the fork of +8½ + 1½ + ½ = 10½°. + +[Illustration: Fig. 15.] + +Writers generally only consider the movement of the fork from drop to +drop on the pallets, but we will be thoroughly practical in the matter. +With a total motion of the fork of 10½° (JAW, Fig. 15), one-half, or 5¼° +will be performed on each side of the line of centers. We are at liberty +to choose any impulse angle which we may prefer; 3 to 1 is a good +proportion for an ordinary well-made watch. By employing it, the angle +XA′Y would be equal to 31½°. The radius A′X Fig. 16, is also of the same +proportion, but the angle AA′X is greater because the fork angle WAA′ is +greater than the same angle in Fig. 15. We will notice that the +intersection _k_ is much smaller in Fig. 15 than in Fig. 16. The action +in the latter begins much further from the line of centers than in the +former and outlines an action which should not be made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 16.] + +To come back to the impulse angle, some might use a proportion of 3.5, 4 +or even 5 to 1, while others for the finest of watches would only use +2.75 to 1. By having a total vibration of the balance of 1½ turns, which +is equal to 540° a fork angle of 10° and a proportion of 2.75 for the +impulse angle which would be equal to 10 × 2.75 = 27.5°. The _free_ +vibration of the balance, or as this is called, "the supplemental arc," +is equal to 540° - 27.5° = 512.50°, while with a proportion of 5 to 1, +making an impulse angle of 50°, it would be equal to 490°. To sum up, +the finer the watch the lower the proportion, the closer the action to +the line of centers, the smaller the friction. On account of leverage +the more difficult the unlocking but the more energetic the impulse when +it does occur. The velocity of the ruby pin at P; Fig. 14, is much +greater than at W, consequently it will not be overtaken as soon by the +fork as at W. The velocity of the fork at the latter point is greater +than at P; the intersection of _ii_ and _cc_ is also not as great; +therefore the lower the proportion the finer and more exact must the +workmanship be. + +We will notice that the unlocking action has been overruled by the +impulse. The only point so far in which the former has been favored is +in the diminished action before the line of centers, as previously +pointed out at P, Fig. 14. + +We will now consider the width of the ruby pin and to get a good insight +into the question, we will study Fig. 17. A is the pallet center, A′ the +balance center, the line AA′ being the line of centers; the angle WAA +equals half the total motion of the fork, the other half, of course, +taking place on the opposite side of the center line. WA is the _center_ +of the fork when it rests against the bank. The angle AA′X represents +half the impulse angle; the other half, the same as with the fork, is +struck on the other side of the center line. At the point of +intersection of these angles we will draw _cc_ from the pallet center A, +which equals the acting length of the fork, and from the balance center +we will draw _ii_, which equals the _theoretical_ impulse radius; some +writers use it as the _real_ radius. The wider the ruby pin the greater +will the latter be, which we will explain presently. + +The ruby pin in entering the fork must have a certain amount of freedom +for action, from 1 to 1¼°. Should the watch receive a jar at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent or passing hollow in the roller, the +fork would fly against the ruby pin. It is important that the angular +freedom between the fork and ruby pin at the moment it enters into the +slot be _less_ than the total locking angle on the pallets. If we employ +a locking angle of 1½° and ½° run, we would have a total lock on the +pallets of 2°. By allowing 1¼° of freedom for the ruby pin at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent, in case the fork should strike the +face of the ruby pin, the pallets will still be locked ¾° and the fork +drawn back against the bankings through the draft angle. + +We will see what this shake amounts to for a given acting length of +fork, which describes an arc of a circle, therefore the acting length is +only the radius of that circle and must be multiplied by two in order to +get the diameter. The acting length of fork = 4.5 mm., what is the +amount of shake when the ruby pin passes the acting corner? +4.5 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ 360° = .0785 × 1.25 = .0992 mm. The shake of the ruby +pin in the slot of the fork must be as slight as possible, consistent +with perfect freedom of action. It varies from ¼° to ½°, according to +length of fork and shape of ruby pin. A square ruby pin requires more +shake than any other kind; it enters the fork and receives the impulse +in a diagonal direction on the jewel, in which position it is +illustrated at Z, Fig. 20. This ruby pin acts on a knife edge, but for +all that the engaging friction during the unlocking action is +considerable. + +Our reasoning tells us it matters not if a ruby pin be wide or narrow, +it must have _the same_ freedom in passing the acting edge of the fork, +therefore, to have the impulse radius on the point of intersection of +A′X with AW, Fig. 17, we would require a _very_ narrow ruby pin. With 1° +of freedom at the edge, and ½° in the slot, we could only have a ruby +pin of a width of 1½°. Applying it to the preceding example it would +only have an actual width of .0785 × 1.5 = .1178 mm., or the size of an +ordinary balance pivot. At _n_, Fig. 17, we illustrate such a ruby pin; +the theoretical and real impulse radius coincide with one another. The +intersection of the circle _ii_ and _cc_ is very slight, while the +friction in unlocking begins within 1° of half the total movement of the +fork from the line of centers; to illustrate, if the angular motion is +11° the ruby pin under discussion will begin action 4½° before the line +of centers, being an engaging, or "uphill" friction of considerable +magnitude. + +[Illustration: Fig. 17.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 18.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 19.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 20.] + +The intersection with the fork is also much less than with the wider +ruby pin, making the impulse action very delicate. On the other hand the +widest ruby pin for which there is any occasion is one beginning the +unlocking action on the line of centers, Fig. 17; this entails a width +of slot equal to the angular motion of the fork. We see here the +advantage of a wide ruby pin over a narrow one in the unlocking action. +Let us now examine the question from the standpoint of the impulse +action. + +Fig. 18 illustrates the moment the impulse is transmitted; the fork has +been moved in the direction of the arrow by the ruby pin; the escapement +has been unlocked and the opposite side of the slot has just struck the +ruby pin. The exact position in which the impulse is transmitted varies +with the locking angle, the width of ruby pin, its shake in the slot, +the length of fork, its weight, and the velocity of the ruby pin, which +is determined by the vibrations of the balance and the impulse radius. + +In an escapement with a total lock of 1¾° and 1¼ of shake in the slot, +theoretically, the impulse would be transmitted 2° from the bankings. +The narrow ruby pin n receives the impulse on the line _v_, which is +closer to the line of centers than the line _u_, on which the large ruby +pin receives the impulse. Here then we have an advantage of the narrow +ruby pin over a wide one; with a wider ruby pin the balance is also more +liable to rebank when it takes a long vibration. Also on account of the +greater angle at which the ruby pin stands to the slot when the impulse +takes place, the _drop_ of the fork against the jewel will amount to +more than its shake in the slot (which is measured when standing on the +line of centers). On this account some watches have slots dovetailed in +form, being wider at the bottom, others have ruby pins of this form. +They require very exact execution; we think we can do without them by +judiciously selecting a width of ruby pin between the two extremes. We +would choose a ruby pin of a width equal to half the angular motion of +the fork. There is an ingenious arrangement of fork and roller which +aims to, and partially does, overcome the difficulty of choosing between +a wide and narrow ruby pin, it is known as the Savage pin roller +escapement. We intend to describe it later. + +If the face of the ruby pin were planted on the theoretical impulse +radius _ii_, Fig. 19, the impulse would end in a butting action as +shown; hence the great importance of distinguishing between the +theoretical and real impulse radius and establishing a reliable data +from which to work. We feel that these actions have never been properly +and thoroughly treated in simple language; we have tried to make them +plain so that anyone can comprehend them with a little study. + +Three good forms of ruby pins are the triangular, the oval and the flat +faced; for ordinary work the latter is as good as any, but for fine work +the triangular pin with the corners slightly rounded off is preferable. + +[Illustration: Fig. 21.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 23.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 22.] + +English watches are met with having a cylindrical or round ruby pin. +Such a pin should never be put into a watch. The law of the +parallelogram of forces is completely ignored by using such a pin; the +friction during the unlocking and impulse actions is too severe, as it +is, without the addition of so unmechanical an arrangement. Fig. 21 +illustrates the action of a round ruby pin; _ii_ is the path of the ruby +pin; _cc_ that of the acting length of the fork. It is shown at the +moment the impulse is transmitted. It will be seen that the impact takes +place _below_ the center of the ruby pin, whereas it should take place +at the center, as the motion of the fork is _upwards_ and that of the +ruby pin _downwards_ until the line of the centers has been reached. +The same rule applies to the flat-faced pin and it is important that the +right quantity be ground off. We find that 3/7 is approximately the +amount which should be ground away. Fig. 22 illustrates the fork +standing against the bank. The ruby pin touches the side of the slot but +has not as yet begun to act; _ri_ is the real impulse circle for which +we allow 1¼° of freedom at the acting edge of the fork; the face of the +ruby pin is therefore on this line. The next thing to do is to find the +center of the pin. From the side _n_ of the slot we construct the right +angle _o n t_; from _n_, we transmit ½ the width of the pin, and plant +the center _x_ on the line _n t_. We can have the center of the pin +slightly below this line, but in no case above it; but if we put it +below, the pin will be thinner and therefore more easily broken. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +_The Safety Action._ Although this action is separate from the impulse +and unlocking actions, it is still very closely connected with them, +much more so in the single than in the double roller escapement. If we +were to place the ruby pin at _X_, Fig. 14, we could have a much +smaller roller than by placing it at _P_. With the small roller the +safety action is more secure, as the intersection at _m_ is greater than +at _k_. It is not as liable to "butt" and the friction is less when the +guard point is thrown against the small roller. Suppose we take two +rollers, one with a diameter of 2.5 mm., the other just twice this +amount, of 5 mm. By having the guard radius and pressure the same in +each case, if the guard point touched the larger roller it would not +only have twice, but four times more effect than on the smaller one. We +will notice that the smaller the impulse angle the larger the roller, +because the ruby pin is necessarily placed farther from the center. The +position of the ruby pin should, therefore, govern the size of the +roller, which should be as small as possible. There should only be +enough metal left between the circumference of the roller and the face +of the jewel to allow for a crescent or passing hollow of sufficient +depth and an efficient setting for the jewel. For this reason, as well +as securing the correct impulse radius and therefore angle, when +replacing the ruby pin, and having it set securely and mechanically in +the roller, it is necessary that the pin and the hole in the roller be +of the same form, and a good fit. Fig. 23 illustrates the difference in +size of rollers. In the smaller one the conditions imposed are +satisfied, while in the larger one they are not. In the single roller +the safety action is at the mercy of the impulse and pallet angles. We +have noticed that in order to favor the impulse we require a large +roller, and for the safety action a small one, therefore escapements +made on fine principles are supplied with two rollers, one for each +action. + +It may be well to say that in our opinion a proportion between the fork +and impulse angles in 10° pallets of 3 or 3½ to 1, _depending_ upon the +size of the escapement, is the lowest which should be made in single +roller. We have seen them in proportions of 2 to 1 in single roller--a +scientific principle foolishly applied--resulting in an action entirely +unsatisfactory. + +When the guard point is pressed against the roller the escape tooth must +still rest on the locking face of the pallet; if the total lock is 2°, by +allowing 1¼° freedom for the guard point between the bank and the roller +the escapement will still be locked ¾°. How much this shake actually +amounts to depends upon the guard radius. Suppose this to be 4 mm., +then the freedom would equal 4 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.25 = .0873 mm. + +[Illustration: Fig. 24.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 25.] + +_The Crescent_ in the roller must be large and deep enough so it will be +impossible for the guard point to touch in or on the corners of it; at +the same time it must not be too large, as it would necessitate a longer +horn on the fork than is necessary. + +Fig. 24 shows the slot _n_ of the fork standing at the bank. The ruby +pin _o_ touches it, but has not as yet acted on it; _s s_ illustrates a +single roller, while S2 illustrates the safety roller for a double +roller escapement. In order to find the dimensions of the crescent in +the single roller we must proceed as follows: WA is in the center of the +fork when it rests against the bank, and is, therefore, one of the sides +of the fork angle, and is drawn from the pallet center; V A W is an +angle of 1¼°, which equals the freedom between the guard point and the +roller; _g g_ represents the path of the guard pin _u_ for the single +roller, and is drawn at the intersection of VA with the roller A′ A2 is +a line drawn from the balance center through that of the ruby pin, and +therefore also passes through the center of the crescent. By planting a +compass on this line, where it cuts the periphery of the roller, and +locating the point of intersection of VA with the roller, will give us +one-half the crescent, the remaining half being transferred to the +opposite side of the line A′ A2. We will notice that the guard point has +entered the crescent 1¼° before the fork begins to move. + +The angle of opening for the crescent in the double roller escapement is +greater than in the single, because it is placed closer to the balance +center, and the guard point or dart further from the pallet center, +causing a greater intersection; also the velocity of the guard point has +increased, while that of the safety roller has decreased. Fig. 24, at +_ff_, shows the path of the dart _h_, which also has 1¼° freedom between +bank and roller. From the balance center we draw A′ _d_ touching the +center or point of the dart; from this point we construct at 5° angle +_b_ A′ _d_. This is to ensure sufficient freedom for the dart when +entering the crescent. We plant a compass on the point of intersection +of A′ A2 with the safety roller, S2, and locating the point where A′_b_ +intersects it, have found one-half the opening for the crescent, the +remaining half being constructed on the opposite side of the line A′ A2. + +_The Horn_ on the fork belongs to the safety action: more horn is +required with the double than with the single roller, on account of the +greater angle of opening for the crescent. + +The horn should be of such a length that when the crescent has passed +the guard point, the end of the horn should point to at least the center +of the ruby pin. + +The dotted circle, _s s_, Fig. 25, represents a single roller. It will +be noticed that the corner of the crescent has passed the guard pin _u_ +by a considerable angle, and although this is so, in case of an accident +the _acting edge_ of the fork would come in contact with the ruby pin; +this proves that a well made single roller escapement really requires +but little horn, only enough to ensure the safe entry of the ruby pin in +case the guard point at that moment be thrown against the roller. We +will now examine the question from the standpoint of the double roller; +S2, Fig. 25, is the safety roller; the corner of the crescent has safely +passed the dart _h_; the centers of the ruby pin _o_ and of the crescent +being on the line A′ A2, we plant the compass on the pallet center and +the center of the face of the ruby pin and draw _k k_, which will be the +path described by the horn. The end of the horn is therefore planted +upon it from 1½° to 1¾° from the ruby pin; this freedom at the end of +the horn is therefore from ¼° to ½° more than we allow for the guard +point; it depends upon the size of the escapement and locking angles +which we would choose. It must in any case be less than the lock on the +pallets, so that the fork will be drawn back against the bank in case +the horn be thrown against the ruby pin. + +When treating on the width of the ruby pin, we mentioned the Savage pin +roller escapement, which we illustrate in Figs. 26 and 27. This +ingenious arrangement was designed with the view of combining the +advantages of both wide and narrow pins and at the same time without any +of their disadvantages. + +In Fig. 26 we show the unlocking pins _u_ beginning their action on the +line of centers--the best possible point--in unlocking the escapement. +These pins were made of gold in all which we examined, although it is +recorded that wide ruby pins and ruby rollers have been used in this +escapement, which would be preferable. + +The functions of the two pins in the roller are simply to unlock the +escapement; the impulse is not transmitted to them as is the case in the +ordinary fork and roller action. In this action the guard pin _i_ also +acts as the impulse pin. We will notice that the passing hollow in this +roller is a rectangular slot the same as in the ordinary fork. When the +escapement is being unlocked the guard pin _i_ enters the hollow and +when the escape tooth comes into contact with the lifting plane of the +pallet the pin _i_, Fig. 27, transmits the impulse to the roller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 26.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +The impulse is transmitted closer to the line of centers than could be +done with any ruby pin. If the pin _i_ were wider the impulse would be +transmitted still closer to the line of centers, but the intersection of +it with the roller would be less. It is very delicate as it is, +therefore from a practical standpoint it ought to be made thin but +consistent with solidity. If the pin is anyway large, it should be +flattened on the sides, otherwise the friction would be similar to that +of the round ruby pin. It would also be preferable (on account of the +pin _i_ being very easily bent) to make the impulse piece narrow but of +such a length that it could be screwed to the fork, the same as the dart +in the double roller. The impulse radius is also the radius of the +roller, because the impulse is transmitted to the roller itself; for +this reason the latter is smaller in this action than in the ordinary +one having the same angles; also a shorter lever is in contact with a +longer one in the unlocking than in ordinary action of the same angles; +but for all this the pins _u u_ should be pitched close to the edge of +the roller, as the angular connection of the balance with the escapement +would be increased during the unlocking action. This escapement being +very delicate requires a 12° pallet angle and a proportion between +impulse and pallet angles of not less than 3 to 1, which would mean an +impulse angle of 36°; this, together with the first rate workmanship +required are two of the reasons why this action is not often met with. + +George Savage, of London, England, invented this action. He was a +watchmaker who, in the early part of this century, did much to perfect +the lever escapement by good work and nice proportion, besides inventing +the two pin variety. He spent the early part of his life in Clerkenwell, +but in his old days emigrated to Canada, and founded a flourishing +retail business in Montreal, where he died. Some of George Savage's +descendants are still engaged at the trade in Canada at the present day. + +The correct delineation of the lever escapement is a very important +matter. We illustrate one which is so delineated that it can be +practically produced. We have not noticed a draft of the lever +escapement, especially with equidistant pallets and club teeth, which +would act correctly in a watch. + +We have been aggressive in our work and have sometimes found theories +propounded and elongated which of themselves were not right; this may +have something to do with it, that we so often hear workmen say, "Theory +is no use, because if you work according to it your machine will not +run." We say, "No, sir, if your theory is not right in itself, then your +work will certainly not be correct; but if your theory be correct then +your work _must_ be correct. Why? it simply cannot be otherwise." We +will give it another name; let us say, apply sense, reason, thought, +experience and study to your work, and what have you done? You have +simply applied theory. + +A theorem is a proposition to be proved, not being able to prove it, we +must simply change it according as our experience dictates, this is +precisely what we have done with the escapement after having followed +the deductions of recognized authorities with the result that we can now +illustrate an escapement which has been thoroughly subjected to an +impartial analysis in every respect, and which is theoretically and +practically correct. + +We will not only give instructions for drafting the escapement now under +consideration, but will also make explanations how to draft it in +different positions, also in circular pallet and single roller. We are +convinced that by so doing we will do a service to many, we also wish to +avoid what we may call "the stereotyped" process, that is, one which may +be acquired by heart, but introduce any changes and perplexity is the +result. It is really not a difficult matter to draft escapements in +different positions, as an example will show. + +Before making a draft we must know exactly what we wish to produce. It +is well in drafting escapements to make them as large as possible, say +thirty to forty times larger than in the watch, in the present case the +size is immaterial, but we must have specifications for the proportions +of the angles. Our draft is to be the most difficult subject in lever +escapements; it is to be represented just as if it were working in a +watch; it is to represent a good and reliable action in every respect, +one which can be applied without special difficulty to a good watch, and +is to be "up to date" in every particular and to contain the majority +of the best points and conclusions reached in our analysis. + +_Specifications for Lever Escapement_: The pallets are to be +equidistant; the wheel teeth of the "club" form; there are to be two +rollers; wheel, pallet, and balance centers are to be in straight line. +The lock is to be 1½°, the run ¼°, making a total lock of 1¾°; the +movement of pallets from drop to drop is to be 10°, while the fork is to +move through 10¼° from bank to bank; the lift on the wheel teeth is to +be 3°, while the remainder is to be the lift on the pallets as follows: +10¼ - (1¾ + 3) = 5½° for lift of pallets. + +The wheel is to have 15 teeth, with pallets spanning 3 teeth or 2½ +spaces, making the angle from lock to lock = 360 ÷ 15 × 2½ = 60°, the +interval from tooth to tooth is 360 ÷ 15 = 24°; divided by 2 +pallets = 24 ÷ 2 = 12° for width of tooth, pallet and drop; drop is to +be 1½°, the tooth is to be ¾ the width of the pallet, making a tooth of +a width of 4½° and a pallet of 6°. + +The draw is to be 12° on each pallet, while the locking faces of the +teeth are to incline 24°. The acting length of fork is to be equal to +the distance of centers of scape wheel and pallets; the impulse angle is +to be 28°; freedom from dart and safety, roller is to be 1¼°, and for +dart and corner of crescent 5°; freedom for ruby pin and acting edge of +fork is to be 1¼°; width of slot is to be ½ the total motion, or +10¼ ÷ 2 = 5⅛°; shake of ruby pin in slot = ¼°, leaving 5⅛ - ¼ = 4⅞° for +width of ruby pin. + +Radius of safety roller to be 4/7 of the theoretical impulse radius. The +length of horn is to be such that the end would point at least to the +center of the ruby pin when the edge of the crescent passes the dart; +space between the end of horn and ruby pin is to be 1½°. + +It is well to know that the angles for width of teeth, pallets and drop +are measured from the wheel center, while the lifting and locking angles +are struck from the pallet center, the draw from the locking corners of +the pallets, and the inclination of the teeth from the locking edge. + +In the fork and roller action, the angle of motion, the width of slot, +the ruby pin and its shake, the freedom between dart and roller, of ruby +pin with acting edge of fork and end of horn are all measured from the +pallet center, while the impulse angle and the crescent are measured +from the balance center. A sensible drawing board measures 17 × 24 +inches, we also require a set of good drawing instruments, the finer the +instruments the better; pay special attention to the compasses, pens and +protractor; add to this a straight ruler and set square. + +The best all-round drawing paper, both for India ink and colored work +has a rough surface; it must be fastened firmly and evenly to the board +by means of thumb tacks; the lines must be light and made with a hard +pencil. Use Higgins' India ink, which dries rapidly. + +[Illustration] + +We will begin by drawing the center line A′ A B; use the point B for the +escape center; place the compass on it and strike G H, the primitive or +geometrical circle of the escape wheel; set the center of the protractor +at B and mark off an angle of 30° on each side of the line of centers; +this will give us the angles A B E and A B F together, forming the angle +F B E of 60°, which represents from lock to lock of the pallets. Since +the chord of the angle of 60° is equal to the radius of the circle, this +gives us an easy means of verifying this angle by placing the compass at +the points of intersection of F B and E B with the primitive circle G H; +this distance must be equal to the radius of the circle. At these points +we will construct right angles to E B and F B, thus forming the tangents +C A and D A to the primitive circle G H. These tangents meet on the line +of centers at A, which will be the pallet center. Place the compass at A +and draw the locking circle M N at the points of intersection of E B and +F B with the primitive circle G H. The locking edges of the pallets will +always stand on this circle no matter in what relation the pallets +stand to the wheel. Place the center of the protractor at B and draw the +angle of width of pallets of 6°; I B E being for the engaging and J B F +for the disengaging pallet. In the equidistant pallet I B is drawn on +the side towards the center, while J B is drawn further from the center. +If we were drawing a circular pallet, one-half the width of pallets +would be placed on each side of E B and F B. At the points of +intersection of I B and J B with the primitive circle G H we draw the +path O for the discharging edge of the engaging and P for that of the +disengaging pallet. The total lock being 1¾°, we construct V′ A at this +angle from C A; the point of intersection of V′ A with the locking +circle M N, is the position of the locking corner of the engaging +pallet. The pallet having 12° draw when locked we place the center of +the protractor on this corner and draw the angle Q M E. Q M will be the +locking face of the engaging pallet. If the face of the pallet were on +the line E B there would be no draw, and if placed to the opposite side +of E B the tooth would repel the pallet, forming what is known as the +repellant escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +Having shown how to delineate the locking face of the engaging pallet +when locked, we will now consider how to draft both it and the +disengaging pallet in correct positions when unlocked; to do so we +direct our attention until further notice to Fig. 28. The locking faces +Q M of the engaging and S N of the disengaging pallets are shown in +dotted lines _when locked_. We must now consider the relation which the +locking faces will bear to E B in the engaging, and to F B in the +disengaging pallets when unlocked. This is a question of some +importance; it is easy enough to represent the 12° from the 30° angles +when locked; we must be certain that they would occupy exactly that +position and yet show them unlocked; we shall take pains to do so. In +due time we shall show that there is no appreciable loss of lift on the +engaging pallet in the escapement illustrated; the angle T A V +therefore shows the total lift; we have not shown the corresponding +angles on the disengaging side because the angles are somewhat +different, but the total lift is still the same. G H represents the +primitive circle of the escape wheel, and X Z that of the real, while +M N represents the circular course which the locking corners of the +pallets take in an equidistant escapement. At a convenient position we +will construct the circle C C′ D from the pallet center A. Notice the +points _e_ and _c_, where V A and T A intersect this circle; the space +between _e_ and _c_ represents the extent of the motion of the pallets +at this particular distance from the center A; this being so, then let +us apply it to the engaging pallet. At the point of intersection _o_ of +the dotted line Q M (which is an extended line on which the face of the +pallet lies when locked), with the circle C C′ D, we will plant our +dividers and transfer _e c_ to _o n_. By setting our dividers on _o_ M +and transferring to _n_ M′, we will obtain the location of Q′ M′, the +locking face when unlocked. Let us now turn our attention to the +disengaging pallet. The dotted line S N represents the location of the +locking face of the disengaging pallet when locked at an angle of 12° +from F B. At the intersection of S N with the circle C C′ D we obtain +the point _j_. The motion of the two pallets being equal, we transfer +the distance _e c_ with the dividers from _j_ and obtain the point _l_. +By setting the dividers on _j_ N and transferring to _l_ N′ we draw the +line S′ N′ on which the locking face of the disengaging pallet will be +located when unlocked. It will be perfectly clear to anyone that through +these means we can correctly represent the pallets in any desired +position. + +We will notice that the face Q′ M′ of the engaging pallet when unlocked +stands at a greater angle to E B than it did when locked, while the +opposite is the case on the disengaging pallet, in which the angle +S′ N′ F is much less than S N F. This shows that the _deeper_ the +engaging pallet locks, the lighter will the draw be, while the opposite +holds good with the disengaging pallet; also, that the draw increases +during the unlocking of the engaging, and decreases during the unlocking +of the disengaging pallet. These points show that the draw should be +measured with the _fork standing against the bank_; not when the locking +corner of the pallet stands on the primitive circle, as is so often +done. The recoil of the wheel (which determines the draw), is +illustrated by the difference between the locking circle M N and the +face Q M for the engaging, and S N for the disengaging pallet, and along +the _acting_ surface it is alike on each pallet, showing that the draft +angle should be the same on each pallet. + +A number of years ago we constructed the escapement model which we +herewith illustrate. All the parts are adjustable; the pallets can be +moved in any direction, the draft angles can be changed at will. Through +this model we can practically demonstrate the points of which we have +spoken. Such a model can be made by workmen after studying these +papers. + +[Illustration] + +In both the equidistant and circular pallets the locking face S N of the +disengaging pallet deviates more from the locking circle M N than does +the locking face Q M of the engaging pallet, as will be seen in the +diagram. This is because the draft angle is struck from E B which +deviates from the locking circle in such a manner, that if the face of a +pallet were planted on it and _locked deep enough_ to show it, the +wheel would actually _repel_ the pallet, whereas with the disengaging +pallet if it were planted on F B, it would actually produce draw if +locked very deep; this is on account of the natural deviation of the 30° +lines from the locking circle. This difference is more pronounced in the +circular than in the equidistant pallet, because in the former we have +two locking circles, the larger one being for the engaging pallet, and +as an arc of a large circle does not deviate as much from a straight +line as does that of a smaller circle, it will be easily understood that +the natural difference before spoken of is only enhanced thereby. For +this reason in order to produce an _actual_ draw of 12°, the engaging +pallet may be set at a slightly greater angle from E B in the circular +escapement; the amount depends upon the width of the pallets; the +requirements are that the recoil of the wheel will be the same on each +pallet. We must, however, repeat that one of the most important points +is to measure the draw when the fork stands against the bank, thereby +_increasing_ the draw on the engaging and _decreasing_ that of the +disengaging pallet _during_ the unlocking action, thus _naturally_ +balancing one fault with another. + +We will again proceed with the delineation of the escapement here +illustrated. After having drawn the locking face Q M, we draw the angle +of width of teeth of 4½°, by planting the protractor on the escape +center B. We measure the angle E B K, from the locking face of the +pallet; the line E B does not touch the locking face of the pallet at +the present time of contact with the tooth, therefore a line must be +drawn from the point of contact to the center B. We did so in our +drawing but do not illustrate it, as in a reduced engraving of this kind +it would be too close to E B and would only cause confusion. We will now +draw in the lifting angle of 3° for the tooth. From the tangent C A we +draw T A at the required angle; at the point of intersection of T A with +the 30° line E B we have the real circumference of the escape wheel. It +will only be necessary to connect the locking edge of the tooth with the +line K B, where the real or outer circle intersects it. It must be drawn +in the same manner in the circular escapement; if the tooth were drawn +up to the intersection of K B with T A, the lift would be too great, as +that point is further from the center A than the points of contact are. + +If the real or outer circle of the wheel intersects both the locking +circle M N and the path O of the discharging edge at the points where +T A intersects them, then there will be _no loss_ of lift on the +engaging pallet. This is precisely how it is in the diagram; but if +there is any deviation, then the angle of loss must be measured on the +_real_ diameter of the wheel and not on the primitive, as is usually +done, as the real diameter of the wheel, or in other words the heel of +the tooth, forms the last point of contact. With a wider tooth and a +greater lifting angle there will even be a _gain_ of lift on the +engaging pallet; the pallet in such a case would actually require a +smaller lifting angle, according to the amount of gain. We gave full +directions for measuring the loss when describing its effects in Fig. 8. +Whatever the loss amounts to, it is added to the lifting plane of the +pallet. In the diagram under discussion there is no loss, consequently +the lifting angle on the pallet is to be 5½°. From V′ A we draw V A at +the required angle; the point of intersection of V A with the path O +will be the discharging edge O. It will now only be necessary to connect +the locking corner M with it, and we have the lifting plane of the +pallet; the discharging side of the pallet is then drawn parallel to the +locking face and made a suitable length. We will now draw the locking +edges of the tooth by placing the center of the protractor on the +locking edge M and construct the angle B M M′ of 24° and draw a circle +from the scape center B, to which the line M M′ will be a tangent. We +will utilize this circle in drawing in the faces of the other teeth +after having spaced them off 24° apart, by simply putting a ruler on +the locking edges and on the periphery of the circle. + +We now construct W′ A as a tangent to the outer circle of the wheel, +thus forming the lifting angle D A W′ of 3° for the teeth; this +corresponds to the angle T A C on the engaging side. W′ A touches the +outer circle of the wheel at the intersection of F B with it. We will +notice that there is considerable deviation of W′ A from the circle at +the intersection of J B with it. At the intersecting of this point we +draw U A; the angle U A W′ is the loss of lift. This angle must be added +to the lifting angle of the pallets; we see that in this action there is +no loss on the engaging pallet, but on the disengaging the loss amounts +to approximately ⅞° in the action illustrated. As we have allowed ¼° of +run for the pallets, the discharging edge P is removed at this angle +from U A; we do not illustrate it, as the lines would cause confusion +being so close together. The lifting angle on the pallet is measured +from the point P and amounts to 5½° + the angle of the loss; the angle +W A U embraces the above angles besides ¼° for run. If the locks are +equal on each pallet, it proves that the lifts are also equal. This +gives us a practical method of proving the correctness of the drawing; +to do so, place the dividers on the locking circle M N at the +intersection of T A and V A with it, as this is the extent of motion; +transfer this measurement to N, if the _actual_ lift is the same on each +pallet, the dividers will locate the point which the locking corner N +will occupy _when locked_; this, in the present case, will be at an +angle of 1¾° below the tangent D A. By this simple method, the +correctness of our proposition that the loss of lift should be measured +from the outside circle of the wheel, can be proven. We often see the +loss measured for the engaging pallet on the primitive circumference +G H, and on the real circumference for the disengaging; if one is right +then the other must be wrong, as there is a noticeable deviation of the +tangent C A from the primitive circle G H at the intersection of the +locking circle M N; had we added this amount to the lifting angle V′ A V +of the engaging pallet, the result would have been that the discharging +edge O would be over 1° below its present location, thus showing that by +the time the lift on the engaging pallet had been completed, the locking +corner N of the disengaging pallet would be locked at an angle of 2¾° +instead of only 1¾°. Many watches contain precisely this fault. If we +wish to make a draft showing the pallets at any desired position, at the +center of motion for instance, with the fork standing on the line of +centers, we would proceed in the following manner: 10¼° being the total +motion, one-half would equal 5⅛°; as the total lock equals 1¾°, we +deduct this amount from it which leaves 5⅛ - 1¾ = 3⅜°, which is the +angle at which the locking corner M should be shown above the tangent +C A. Now let us see where the locking corner N should stand; M having +moved up 5⅛°, therefore N moved down by that amount, the lift on the +pallet being 5½° and on the tooth 3° (which is added to the tangent +D A), it follows that N should stand 5½ + 3 - 5⅛ = 3⅜° above D A. We can +prove it by the lock, namely: 3⅜° + 1¾ = 5⅛°, half the remaining motion. +This shows how simple it is to draft pallets in various positions, +remembering always to use the tangents to the primitive circle as +measuring points. We have fully explained how to draw in the draft angle +on the pallets when unlocked, and do not require to repeat it, except to +say, that most authorities draw a tangent R N to the locking circle M N, +forming in other words, the right angle R N A, then construct an angle +of 12° from R N. We have drawn ours in by our own method, which is the +correct one. While we here illustrate S N R at an angle of 12° it is in +reality _less_ than that amount; had we constructed S N at an angle of +12° from R N, then the draw would be 12° from F B, when the primitive +circumference of the wheel is reached, but _more_ than 12° when the +fork is against the bank. + +The space between the discharging edge P and the heel of the tooth forms +the angle of drop J B I of 1½°; the definition for drop is that it is +the freedom for wheel and pallet. This is not, strictly speaking, +perfectly correct, as, during the unlocking action there will be a +recoil of the wheel to the extent of the draft angle; the heel of the +tooth will therefore approach the edge P, and the discharging side of +the pallet approaches the tooth, as only the discharging edge moves on +the path P. + +A good length for the teeth is 1/10 the diameter of the wheel, measured +from the primitive diameter and from the locking edge of the tooth. + +The backs of the teeth are hollowed out so as not to interfere with the +pallets, and are given a nice form; likewise the rim and arms are drawn +in as light and as neat as possible, consistent with strength. + +Having explained the delineation of the wheel and pallet action we will +now turn our attention to that of the fork and roller. We tried to +explain these actions in such a manner that by the time we came to +delineate them no difficulty would be found, as in our analysis we +discussed the subject sufficiently to enable any one of ordinary +intelligence to obtain a correct knowledge of them. The fork and roller +action in straight line, right, or any other angle is delineated after +the methods we are about to give. + +We specified that the acting length of fork was to be equal to the +center distance of wheel and pallets; this gives a fork of a fair +length. + +Having drawn the line of centers A′ A we will construct an angle equal +to half the angular motion of the pallets; the latter in the case under +consideration being 10¼°, therefore 5⅛° is spaced off on each side of +the line of centers, forming the angles _m_ A _k_ of 10¼°. Placing our +dividers on A B the center distance of 'scape wheel and pallets, we +plant them on A and construct _c c_; thus we will have the acting length +of fork and its path. We saw in our analysis that the impulse angle +should be as small as possible. We will use one of 28° in our draft of +the double roller; we might however remark that this angle should vary +with the construction of the escapements in different watches; if too +small, the balance may be stopped when the escapement is locked, while +if too great it can be stopped during the lift; both these defects are +to be avoided. The angles being respectively 10¼° and 28° it follows +they are of the following proportions: 28° ÷ 10.25 = 2.7316. The impulse +radius therefore bears this relation (but in the inverse ratio to the +angles), to the acting length of fork. + +We will put it in the following proportion; let A_c_ equal acting length +of fork, and _x_ the unknown quantity; 28:10.25 :: A_c_:_x_; the answer +will be the theoretical impulse radius. Having found the required radius +we plant one jaw of our measuring instrument on the point of +intersection of _c c_ with _k_ A or _m_ A and locate the other jaw on +the line of centers; we thus obtain A′ the balance center. Through the +points of intersection before designated we will draft X A′ and Y A′ +forming the impulse angle X A′ Y of 28°. At the intersection of this +angle with the fork angle _k_ A′ _m_, we draw _i i_ from the center A; +this gives us the theoretical impulse circle. The total lock being 1¾° +it follows that the angle described by the balance in unlocking += 1¾ × 2.7316 = 4.788°. According to the specifications the width of +slot is to be 5⅛°; placing the center of the protractor on A we +construct half of this angle on each side of _k_ A, which passes through +the center of the fork when it rests against the bank; this gives us the +angle _s_ A _n_ of 5⅛°. If the disengaging pallet were shown locked then +_m_ A would represent the center of the fork. The slot is to be made of +sufficient depth so there will be no possibility of the ruby pin +touching the bottom of it. The ruby pin is to have 1¼° freedom in +passing the acting edge of the fork; from the center A we construct the +angle _t_ A _n_ of 1¼°; at the point of intersection of _t_ A with _c c_ +the acting radius of the fork, we locate the real impulse radius and +draw the arc _ri ri_ which describes the path made by the face of the +ruby pin. The ruby pin is to have ¼° of shake in the slot; it will +therefore have a width of 4⅞°; this width is drawn in with the ruby pin +imagined as standing over the line of centers and is then transferred to +the position which the ruby pin is to occupy in the drawing. + +The radius of the safety roller was given as 4/7 of the theoretical +impulse radius. They may be made of various proportions; thus â…” is often +used. Remember that the smaller we make it, the less the friction during +accidental contact with the guard pin, the greater must the passing +hollow be and the horn of fork and guard point must be longer, which +increases the weight of the fork. + +Having drawn in the safety roller, and having specified that the freedom +between the dart and safety roller was to be 1¼°, the dart being in the +center of the fork, consequently _k_ A is the center of it; therefore we +construct the angle _k_ A X of 1¼°. At the point of intersection of X A +with the safety roller we draw the arc _g g_; this locates the point of +the dart which we will now draw in. We will next draw _d_ A′ from the +balance center and touching the point of the dart; we now construct +_b_ A′ at an angle of 5° to it. This is to allow the necessary freedom +for the dart when entering the crescent; from A′ we draw a line through +the center of the ruby pin. We do not show it in the drawing, as it +would be indiscernible, coming very close to A′ X. This line will also +pass through the center of the crescent. At the point of intersection of +A′ _b_ with the safety roller we have one of the edges of the crescent. By +placing our compass at the center of the crescent on the periphery of +the roller and on the edge which we have just found, it follows that our +compass will span the radius of the crescent. We now sweep the arc for +the latter, thus also drawing in the remaining half of the crescent on +the other side of A′ X and bringing the crescent of sufficient depth +that no possibility exists of the dart touching in or on the edges of +it. We will now draw in the impulse roller and make it as light as +possible consistent with strength. A hole is shown through the impulse +roller to counterbalance the reduced weight at the crescent. When +describing Fig. 24, we gave instructions for finding the dimensions of +crescent and position of guard pin for the single roller. We will find +the length of horn; to do so we must closely follow directions given for +Fig. 25. In locating the end of the horn, we must find the location of +the center of the crescent and ruby pin _after_ the edge of the crescent +has passed the dart. From the point of intersection of A′ _b_ with the +safety roller we transfer the radius of the crescent on the periphery of +the safety roller towards the side against the bank, then draw a line +from A′ through the point so found. At point of intersection of this +line with the real impulse circle _r i r i_ we draw an arc radiating +from the pallet center; the end of the horn will be located on this arc. +In our drawing the arc spoken of coincides with the dart radius _g g_. +As before pointed out, we gave particulars when treating on Fig. 25, +therefore considered it unnecessary to further complicate the draft by +the addition of all the constructional lines. We specified that the +freedom between ruby pin and end of horn was to be 1½°; these lines, +(which we do not show) are drawn from the pallet center. Having +located the end of the horn on the side standing against the bank, we +place the dividers on it and on the point of intersection of _k_ A with +_g g_--which in this case is on the point of the dart,--and transfer +this measurement along _g g_ which will locate the end of the horn on +the opposite side. + +We have the acting edges of the fork on _cc_ and have also found the +position of the ends of the horns; their curvature is drawn in the +following manner: We place our compasses on A and _r i_, spanning +therefore the real impulse radius; the compass is now set on the acting +edge of the fork and an arc swept with it which is then to be +intersected by another arc swept from the end of the horn, on the same +side of the fork. At the point of intersection of the arcs the compass +is planted and the curvature of the horn drawn in, the same operation is +to be repeated with the other horn. We will now draw in the sides of the +horn of such a form that should the watch rebank, the side of the ruby +pin will squarely strike the fork. If the back of the ruby pin strikes +the fork there will be a greater tendency of breaking it and injuring +the pivots on account of acting like a wedge. The fork and pallets are +now drawn in as lightly as possible and of such form as to admit of +their being readily poised. The banks are to be drawn at equal distances +from the line of centers. In delineating the fork and roller action in +any desired position, it must be remembered that the points of location +of the real impulse radius, the end of horn, the dart or guard pin and +crescent, must _all_ be obtained _when standing against the bank_, and +the arcs drawn which they describe; the parts are then located according +to the angle at which they are removed from the banks. + +We think the instructions given are ample to enable any one to master +the subject. We may add that when one becomes well acquainted with the +escapement, many of the angles radiating from a common center, may be +drawn in at once. We had intended describing the mechanical construction +of the escapement, which does unmistakably present some difficulties on +account of the small dimensions of the parts, but nevertheless it can be +mechanically executed true to the principles enumerated. We have evolved +a method of so producing them that young men in a comparatively short +period have made them from their drafts (without automatic machinery) +that their watches start off when run down the moment the crown is +touched. Perhaps later on we will write up the subject. It is our +intention of doing so, as we make use of such explanations in our +regular work. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by +H. R. Playtner + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT *** + +***** This file should be named 21978-0.txt or 21978-0.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/1/9/7/21978/ + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/21978-0.zip b/21978-0.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..232e190 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-0.zip diff --git a/21978-8.txt b/21978-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..654329f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1999 @@ +Project Gutenberg's An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by H. R. Playtner + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: An Analysis of the Lever Escapement + +Author: H. R. Playtner + +Release Date: June 30, 2007 [EBook #21978] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + + + + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + + +[Illustration: THOMAS MUDGE + +_The first Horologist who successfully applied the Detached Lever +Escapement to Watches._ + +_Born 1715--Died 1794._] + + + + +AN ANALYSIS + +OF THE + +LEVER ESCAPEMENT + +BY H. R. PLAYTNER. + +A LECTURE DELIVERED BEFORE THE CANADIAN WATCHMAKERS' AND RETAIL +JEWELERS' ASSOCIATION. + +ILLUSTRATED. + +CHICAGO: + +HAZLITT & WALKER, PUBLISHERS. + +1910. + + + + +PREFACE. + + +Before entering upon our subject proper, we think it advisable to +explain a few points, simple though they are, which might cause +confusion to some readers. Our experience has shown us that as soon as +we use the words "millimeter" and "degree," perplexity is the result. +"What is a millimeter?" is propounded to us very often in the course of +a year; nearly every new acquaintance is interested in having the metric +system of measurement, together with the fine gauges used, explained to +him. + +The metric system of measurement originated at the time of the French +Revolution, in the latter part of the 18th century; its divisions are +decimal, just the same as the system of currency we use in this country. + +A meter is the ten millionth part of an arc of the meridian of Paris, +drawn from the equator to the north pole; as compared with the English +inch there are 39+3708/10000 inches in a meter, and there are +25.4 millimeters in an inch. + +The meter is sub-divided into decimeters, centimeters and millimeters; +1,000 millimeters equal one meter; the millimeter is again divided into +10ths and the 10ths into 100ths of a millimeter, which could be +continued indefinitely. The 1/100 millimeter is equal to the 1/2540 of +an inch. These are measurements with which the watchmaker is concerned. +1/100 millimeter, written .01 mm., is the side shake for a balance +pivot; multiply it by 2¼ and we obtain the thickness for the spring +detent of a pocket chronometer, which is about 1/3 the thickness of a +human hair. + +The metric system of measurement is used in all the watch factories of +Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United States, and nearly all the +lathe makers number their chucks by it, and some of them cut the leading +screws on their slide rests to it. + +In any modern work on horology of value, the metric system is used. +Skilled horologists use it on account of its _convenience_. The +millimeter is a unit which can be handled on the small parts of a watch, +whereas the inch must always be divided on anything smaller than the +plates. + +Equally as fine gauges can be and are made for the inch as for the +metric system, and the inch is decimally divided, but we require another +decimal point to express our measurement. + +Metric gauges can now be procured from the material shops; they consist +of tenth measures, verniers and micrometers; the finer ones of these +come from Glashutte, and are the ones mentioned by Grossmann in his +essay on the lever escapement. Any workman who has once used these +instruments could not be persuaded to do without them. + +No one can comprehend the geometrical principles employed in escapements +without a knowledge of angles and their measurements, therefore we deem +it of sufficient importance to at least explain what a degree is, as we +know for a fact, that young workmen especially, often fail to see how to +apply it. + +Every circle, no matter how large or small it may be, contains 360°; a +degree is therefore the 360th part of a circle; it is divided into +minutes, seconds, thirds, etc. + +To measure the _value_ of a degree of any circle, we must multiply the +diameter of it by 3.1416, which gives us the circumference, and then +divide it by 360. It will be seen that it depends on the size of that +circle or its radius, as to the value of a degree in any _actual_ +measurement. To illustrate; a degree on the earth's circumference +measures 60 geographical miles, while measured on the circumference of +an escape wheel 7.5 mm. in diameter, or as they would designate it in a +material shop, No. 7½, it would be 7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 = .0655 mm., which +is equal to the breadth of an ordinary human hair; it is a degree in +both cases, but the difference is very great, therefore a degree cannot +be associated with any actual measurement until the radius of the +circle is known. Degrees are generated from the center of the circle, +and should be thought of as to ascension or direction and relative +value. Circles contain four right angles of 90° each. Degrees are +commonly measured by means of the protractor, although the ordinary +instruments of this kind leave very much to be desired. The lines can be +verified by means of the compass, which is a good practical method. + +It may also be well to give an explanation of some of the terms used. + +_Drop_ equals the amount of freedom which is allowed for the action of +pallets and wheel. See Z, Fig. 1. + +_Primitive or Geometrical Diameter._--In the ratchet tooth or English +wheel, the primitive and real diameter are equal; in the club tooth +wheel it means across the locking corners of the teeth; in such a wheel, +therefore, the primitive is _less_ than the real diameter by the height +of two impulse planes. + +_Lock_ equals the depth of locking, measured from the locking corner of +the pallet at the moment the drop has occurred. + +_Run_ equals the amount of angular motion of pallets and fork to the +bankings _after_ the drop has taken place. + +_Total Lock_ equals lock plus run. + +A _Tangent_ is a line which _touches_ a curve, but does not intersect +it. AC and AD, Figs. 2 and 3, are tangents to the primitive circle GH at +the points of intersection of EB, AC, and GH and FB, AD and GH. + +_Impulse Angle_ equals the angular connection of the impulse or ruby pin +with the lever fork; or in other words, of the balance with the +escapement. + +_Impulse Radius._--From the face of the impulse jewel to the center of +motion, which is in the balance staff, most writers assume the impulse +angle and radius to be equal, and it is true that they must conform with +one another. We have made a radical change in the radius and one which +does not affect the angle. We shall prove this in due time, and also +that the wider the impulse pin the greater must the impulse radius be, +although the angle will remain unchanged. + +Right here we wish to put in a word of advice to all young men, and that +is to learn to draw. No one can be a thorough watchmaker unless he can +draw, because he cannot comprehend his trade unless he can do so. + +We know what it has done for us, and we have noticed the same results +with others, therefore we speak from personal experience. Attend night +schools and mechanic's institutes and improve yourselves. + +The young workmen of Toronto have a great advantage in the Toronto +Technical School, but we are sorry to see that out of some 600 students, +only five watchmakers attended last year. We can account for the +majority of them, so it would seem as if the young men of the trade were +not much interested, or thought they could not apply the knowledge to be +gained there. This is a great mistake; we might almost say that +knowledge of any kind can be applied to horology. The young men who take +up these studies, will see the great advantage of them later on; one +workman will labor intelligently and the other do blind "guess" work. + +We are now about to enter upon our subject and deem it well to say, we +have endeavored to make it as plain as possible. It is a deep subject +and is difficult to treat lightly; we will treat it in our own way, +paying special attention to all these points which bothered us during +the many years of painstaking study which we gave to the subject. We +especially endeavor to point out how theory can be applied to practice; +while we cannot expect that everyone will understand the subject without +study, we think we have made it comparatively easy of comprehension. + +We will give our method of drafting the escapement, which happens in +some respects to differ from others. We believe in making a drawing +which we can reproduce in a watch. + + + + +AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT. + + +The lever escapement is derived from Graham's dead-beat escapement for +clocks. Thomas Mudge was the first horologist who successfully applied +it to watches in the detached form, about 1750. The locking faces of the +pallets were arcs of circles struck from the pallet centers. Many +improvements were made upon it until to-day it is the best form of +escapement for a general purpose watch, and when made on mechanical +principles is capable of producing first rate results. + +Our object will be to explain the whys and wherefores of this +escapement, and we will at once begin with the number of teeth in the +escape wheel. It is not obligatory in the lever, as in the verge, to +have an uneven number of teeth in the wheel. While nearly all have 15 +teeth, we might make them of 14 or 16; occasionally we find some in +complicated watches of 12 teeth, and in old English watches, of 30, +which is a clumsy arrangement, and if the pallets embrace only three +teeth in the latter, the pallet center cannot be pitched on a tangent. + +Although advisable from a timing standpoint that the teeth in the escape +wheel should divide evenly into the number of beats made per minute in a +watch with seconds hand, it is not, strictly speaking, necessary that it +should do so, as an example will show. We will take an ordinary watch, +beating 300 times per minute; we will fit an escape wheel of 16 teeth; +multiply this by 2, as there is a forward and then a return motion of +the balance and consequently two beats for each tooth, making +16 × 2 = 32 beats for each revolution of the escape wheel. 300 beats are +made per minute; divide this by the beats made on each revolution, and +we have the number of times in which the escape wheel revolves per +minute, namely, 300 ÷ 32 = 9.375. This number then is the proportion +existing for the teeth and pitch diameters of the 4th wheel and escape +pinion. We must now find a suitable number of teeth for this wheel and +pinion. Of available pinions for a watch, the only one which would +answer would be one of 8 leaves, as any other number would give a +fractional number of teeth for the 4th wheel, therefore 9.375 × 8 = 75 +teeth in 4th wheel. Now as to the proof: as is well known, if we +multiply the number of teeth contained in 4th and escape wheels also by +2, for the reason previously given, and divide by the leaves in the +escape pinion, we get the number of beats made per minute; therefore +(75 × 16 × 2)/8 = 300 beats per minute. + +Pallets can be made to embrace more than three teeth, but would be much +heavier and therefore the mechanical action would suffer. They can also +be made to embrace fewer teeth, but the necessary side shake in the +pivot holes would prove very detrimental to a total lifting angle of +10°, which represents the angle of movement in modern watches. Some of +the finest ones only make 8 or 9° of a movement; the smaller the angle +the greater will the effects of defective workmanship be; 10° is a +common-sense angle and gives a safe escapement capable of fine results. +Theoretically, if a timepiece could be produced in which the balance +would vibrate without being connected with an escapement, we would have +reached a step nearer the goal. Practice has shown this to be the proper +theory to work on. Hence, the smaller the pallet and impulse angles the +less will the balance and escapement be connected. The chronometer is +still more highly detached than the lever. + +The pallet embracing three teeth is sound and practical, and when +applied to a 15 tooth wheel, this arrangement offers certain geometrical +and mechanical advantages in its construction, which we will notice in +due time. 15 teeth divide evenly into 360° leaving an interval of 24° +from tooth to tooth, which is also the angle at which the locking faces +of the teeth are inclined from the center, which fact will be found +convenient when we come to cut our wheel. + +From locking to locking on the pallet scaping over three teeth, the +angle is 60°, which is equal to 2½ spaces of the wheel. Fig. 1 +illustrates the lockings, spanning this arc. If the pallets embraced 4 +teeth, the angle would be 84°; or in case of a 16 tooth wheel scaping +over three teeth, the angle would be 360 × 2.5/16 = 56¼°. + +[Illustration: Fig. 1.] + +Pallets may be divided into two kinds, namely: equidistant and circular. +The equidistant pallet is so-called because the lockings are an equal +distance from the center; sometimes it is also called the tangential +escapement, on account of the unlocking taking place on the intersection +of tangent AC with EB, and FB with AD, the tangents, which is the +valuable feature of this form of escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +AC and AD, Fig. 2, are tangents to the primitive circle GH. ABE and ABF +are angles of 30° each, together therefore forming the angle FBE of +60°. The locking circle MN is struck from the pallet center A; the +interangles being equal, consequently the pallets must be equidistant. + +The weak point of this pallet is that the lifting is not performed so +favorably; by examining the lifting planes MO and NP, we see that the +discharging edge, O, is closer to the center, A, than the discharging +edge, P; consequently the lifting on the engaging pallet is performed on +a shorter lever arm than on the disengaging pallet, also any inequality +in workmanship would prove more detrimental on the engaging than on the +disengaging pallet. The equidistant pallet requires fine workmanship +throughout. We have purposely shown it of a width of 10°, which is the +widest we can employ in a 15 tooth wheel, and shows the defects of this +escapement more readily than if we had used a narrow pallet. A narrower +pallet is advisable, as the difference in the discharging edges will be +less, and the lifting arms would, therefore, not show so much difference +in leverage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +The circular pallet is sometimes appropriately called "the pallet with +equal lifts," as the lever arms AMO and ANP, Fig. 3, are equal lengths. +It will be noticed by examining the diagram, that the pallets are +bisected by the 30° lines EB and FB, one-half their width being placed +on each side of these lines. In this pallet we have two locking circles, +MP for the engaging pallet, and NO for the disengaging pallet. The weak +points in this escapement are that the unlocking resistance is greater +on the engaging than on the disengaging pallet, and that neither of them +lock on the tangents AC and AD, at the points of intersection with EB +and FB. The narrower the circular pallet is made, the nearer to the +tangent will the unlocking be performed. In neither the equidistant or +circular pallets can the unlocking resistance be _exactly_ the same on +each pallet, as in the engaging pallet the friction takes place before +AB, the line of centers, which is more severe than when this line has +been passed, as is the case with the disengaging pallet; this fact +proportionately increases the existing defects of the circular over the +equidistant pallet, and _vice versa_, but for the same reason, the +lifting in the equidistant is proportionately accompanied by more +friction than in the circular. + +Both equidistant and circular pallets have their adherents; the finest +Swiss, French and German watches are made with equidistant escapements, +while the majority of English and American watches contain the circular. +In our opinion the English are wise in adhering to the circular form. We +think a ratchet wheel should not be employed with equidistant pallets. +By examining Fig. 2, we see an English pallet of this form. We have +shown its defects in such a wide pallet as the English (as we have +before stated), because they are more readily perceived; also, on +account of the shape of the teeth, there is danger of the discharging +edge, P, dipping so deep into the wheel, as to make considerable drop +necessary, or the pallets would touch on the backs of the teeth. In the +case of the club tooth, the latter is hollowed out, therefore, less drop +is required. We have noticed that theoretically, it is advantageous to +make the pallets narrower than the English, both for the equidistant and +circular escapements. There is an escapement, Fig. 4, which is just the +opposite to the English. The entire lift is performed by the wheel, +while in the case of the ratchet wheel, the entire lifting angle is on +the pallets; also, the pallets being as narrow as they can be made, +consistent with strength, it has the good points of both the equidistant +and circular pallets, as the unlocking can be performed on the tangent +and the lifting arms are of equal length. The wheel, however, is so much +heavier as to considerably increase the inertia; also, we have a metal +surface of quite an extent sliding over a thin jewel. For practical +reasons, therefore, it has been slightly altered in form and is only +used in cheap work, being easily made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +We will now consider the drop, which is a clear loss of power, and, if +excessive, is the cause of much irregularity. It should be as small as +possible consistent with perfect freedom of action. + +In so far as _angular_ measurements are concerned, no hard and fast rule +can be applied to it, the larger the escape wheel the smaller should be +the angle allowed for drop. Authorities on the subject allow 1½° drop +for the club and 2° for the ratchet tooth. It is a fact that escape +wheels are not cut perfectly true; the teeth are apt to bend slightly +from the action of the cutters. The truest wheel can be made of steel, +as each tooth can be successively ground after being hardened and +tempered. Such a wheel would require less drop than one of any other +metal. Supposing we have a wheel with a primitive diameter of 7.5 mm., +what is the amount of drop, allowing 1½° by angular measurement? +7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .0983 mm., which is sufficient; a hair could +get between the pallet and tooth, and would not stop the watch. Even +after allowing for imperfectly divided teeth, we require no greater +freedom even if the wheel is larger. Now suppose we take a wheel +with a primitive diameter of 8.5 mm. and find the amount of drop; +8.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .1413 mm., or .1413 - .0983 = .043 mm., +more drop than the smaller wheel, if we take the same angle. This is a +waste of force. The angular drop should, therefore, be proportioned +according to the size of the wheel. We wish it to be understood that +common sense must always be our guide. When the horological student once +arrives at this standpoint, he can _intelligently_ apply himself to his +calling. + +_The Draw._--The draw or draft angle was added to the pallets in order +to draw the fork back against the bankings and the guard point from the +roller whenever the safety action had performed its function. + +[Illustration: Fig. 5.] + +Pallets with draw are more difficult to unlock than those without it, +this is in the nature of a fault, but whenever there are two faults we +must choose the less. The rate of the watch will suffer less on account +of the recoil introduced than it would were the locking faces arcs of +circles struck from the pallet center, in which case the guard point +would often remain against the roller. The draw should be as light as +possible consistent with safety of action; some writers allow 15° on the +engaging and 12° on the disengaging pallet; others again allow 12° on +each, which we deem sufficient. The draw is measured from the locking +edges M and N, Fig. 5. The locking planes _when locked_ are inclined 12° +from EB, and FB. In the case of the engaging pallet it inclines toward +the center A. The draw is produced on account of MA being longer than +RA, consequently, when power is applied to the scape tooth S, the pallet +is drawn into the wheel. The disengaging pallet inclines in the same +direction but away from the center A; the reason is obvious from the +former explanation. Some people imagine that the greater the incline on +the locking edge of the escape teeth, the stronger the draw would be. +This is not the case, but it is certainly necessary that the point of +the tooth alone should touch the pallet. From this it follows that the +angle on the teeth must be greater than on the pallets; examine the +disengaging pallet in Fig. 5, as it is from this pallet that the +inclination of the teeth must be determined, as in the case of the +engaging pallet the motion is toward the line of centers AB, and +therefore _away_ from the tooth, which partially explains why some +people advocate 15° draw for this pallet. As illustrated in the case of +the disengaging pallet, however, the motion is also towards the line of +centers AB, and _towards_ the tooth as well, all of which will be seen +by the dotted circles MM2 and NN2, representing the paths of the +pallets. It will be noticed that UNF and BNB are opposite and equal +angles of 12°. For practical reasons, from a manufacturing standpoint, +the angle on the tooth is made just twice the amount, namely 24°; we +could make it a little less or a little more. If we made it less than +20° too great a surface would be in contact with the jewel, involving +greater friction in unlocking and an inefficient draw, but in the case +of an English lever with such an arrangement we could do with less +drop, which advantage would be too dearly bought; or if the angle is +made over 28°, the point or locking edge of the tooth would rapidly +become worn in case of a brass wheel. Also in an English lever more drop +would be required. + +_The Lock._--What we have said in regard to drop also applies to the +lock, which should be as small as possible, consistent with perfect +safety. The greater the drop the deeper must be the lock; 1½° is the +angle generally allowed for the lock, but it is obvious that in a large +escapement it can be less. + +[Illustration: Fig. 6.] + +_The Run._--The run or, as it is sometimes called, "the slide," should +also be as light as possible; from ¼° to ½° is sufficient. It follows +then, the bankings should be as close together as possible, consistent +with requisite freedom for escaping. Anything more than this increases +the angular connection of the balance with the escapement, which +directly violates the theory under which it is constructed; also, a +greater amount of work will be imposed upon the balance to meet the +increased unlocking resistance, resulting in a poor motion and accurate +time will be out of the question. It will be seen that those workmen who +make a practice of opening the banks, "to give the escapement more +freedom" simply jump from the frying pan into the fire. The bankings +should be as far removed from the pallet center as possible, as the +further away they are pitched the less run we require, according to +angular measurement. Figure 6 illustrates this fact; the tooth S has +just dropped on the engaging pallet, but the fork has not yet reached +the bankings. At _a_ we have 1° of run, while if placed at _b_ we would +only have ½° of run, but still the same freedom for escaping, and less +unlocking resistance. + +The bankings should be placed towards the acting end of the fork as +illustrated, as in case the watch "rebanks" there would be more strain +on the lever pivots if they were placed at the other end of the fork. + +[Illustration: Fig. 7.] + +_The Lift._--The lift is composed of the actual lift on the teeth and +pallets and the lock and run. We will suppose that from drop to drop we +allow 10°; if the lock is 1½° then the actual lift by means of the +inclined planes on teeth and pallets will be 8½°. We have seen that a +small lifting angle is advisable, so that the vibrations of the balance +will be as free as possible. There are other reasons as well. Fig. 7 +shows two inclined planes; we desire to lift the weight 2 a distance +equal to the angle at which the planes are inclined; it will be seen at +a glance that we will have less friction by employing the smaller +incline, whereas with the larger one the motive power is employed +through a greater distance on the object to be moved. The smaller the +angle the more energetic will the movement be; the grinding of the +angles and fit of the pivots, etc., also increases in importance. An +actual lift of 8½° satisfies the conditions imposed very well. We have +before seen that both on account of the unlocking and the lifting +leverage of the pallet arms, it would be advisable to make them narrow +both in the equidistant and circular escapement. We will now study the +question from the standpoint of the lift, in so far as the wheel is +concerned. + +[Illustration: Fig. 8.] + +It is self-evident that a narrow pallet requires a wide tooth, and a +wide pallet a narrow or thin tooth wheel; in the ratchet wheel we have a +metal point passing over a jeweled plane. The friction is at its +minimum, because there is less adhesion than with the club tooth, but we +must emphasize the fact that we require a greater angle in proportion on +the pallets in this escapement than with the narrow pallets and wider +tooth. This seems to be a point which many do not thoroughly comprehend, +and we would advise a close study of Fig. 8, which will make it +perfectly clear, as we show both a wide and a narrow pallet. GH, +represents the primitive, which in this figure is also the real diameter +of the escape wheel. In measuring the lifting angles for the pallets, +our starting point is _always_ from the tangents AC and AD. The tangents +are straight lines, but the wheel describes the circle GH, therefore +they must deviate from one another, and the closer to the center A the +discharging edge of the engaging pallet reaches, the greater does this +difference become; and in the same manner the further the discharging +edge of the disengaging pallet is from the center A the greater it is. +This shows that the loss is greater in the equidistant than in the +circular escapement. After this we will designate this difference as +the "loss." In order to illustrate it more plainly we show the widest +pallet--the English--in equidistant form. This gives another reason why +the English lever should only be made with circular pallets, as we have +seen that the wider the pallet the greater the loss. The loss is +measured at the intersection of the path of the discharging edge OO, +with the circle G H, and is shown through AC2, which intersects these +circles at that point. In the case of the disengaging pallet, PP +illustrates the path of the discharging edge; the loss is measured as in +the preceding case where GH is intersected as shown by AD2. It amounts +to a different value on each pallet. Notice the loss between C and C2, +on the engaging, and D and D2 on the disengaging pallet; it is greater +on the engaging pallet, so much so that it amounts to 2°, which is equal +to the entire lock; therefore if 8½° of work is to be accomplished +through this pallet, the lifting plane requires an angle of 10½° struck +from AC. + +Let us now consider the lifting action of the club tooth wheel. This is +decidedly a complicated action, and requires some study to comprehend. +In action with the engaging pallet the wheel moves _up_, or in the +direction of the motion of the pallets, but on the disengaging pallet it +moves _down_, and in a direction opposite to the pallets, and the heel +of the tooth moves with greater velocity than the locking edge; also in +the case of the engaging pallet, the locking edge moves with greater +velocity than the discharging edge; in the disengaging pallet the +opposite is the case, as the discharging edge moves with greater +velocity than the locking. These points involve factors which must be +considered, and the drafting of a correct action is of paramount +importance; we therefore show the lift as it is accomplished in four +different stages in a good action. Fig. 9 illustrates the engaging, and +Fig. 10 the disengaging pallet; by comparing the figures it will be +noticed that the lift takes place on the point of the tooth similar to +the English, until the discharging edge of the pallet has been passed, +when the heel gradually comes into play on the engaging, but more +quickly on the disengaging pallet. + +We will also notice that during the first part of the lift the tooth +moves faster along the engaging lifting plane than on the disengaging; +on pallets 2 and 3 this difference is quite large; towards the latter +part of the lift the action becomes quicker on the disengaging pallet +and slower on the engaging. + +To obviate this difficulty some fine watches, notably those of A. Lange +& Sons, have convex lifting planes on the engaging and concave on the +disengaging pallets; the lifting planes on the teeth are also curved. +See Fig. 11. This is decidedly an ingenious arrangement, and is in +strict accordance with scientific investigation. We should see many fine +watches made with such escapements if the means for producing them could +fully satisfy the requirements of the scientific principles involved. + +[Illustration: Fig. 9.] + +The distribution of the lift on tooth and pallet is a very important +matter; the lifting angle on the tooth must be _less_ in proportion to +its width than it is on the pallet. For the sake of making it perfectly +plain, we illustrate what should not be made; if we have 10½° for width +of tooth and pallet, and take half of it for a tooth, and the other +half for the pallet, making each of them 5¼° in width, and suppose we +have a lifting of 8½° to distribute between them, by allowing 4¼° on +each, the lift would take place as shown in Fig. 12, which is a very +unfavorable action. The edge of the engaging pallet scrapes on the +lifting plane of the tooth, yet it is astonishing to find some otherwise +very fine watches being manufactured right along which contain this +fault; such watches can be stopped with the ruby pin in the fork and the +engaging pallet in action, nor would they start when run down as soon as +the crown is touched, no matter how well they were finished and fitted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 10.] + +The lever lengths of the club tooth are variable, while with the ratchet +they are constant, which is in its favor; in the latter it would always +be as SB, Fig. 13. This is a shorter lever than QB, consequently more +powerful, although the greater velocity is at Q, which only comes into +action after the inertia of wheel and pallets has been overcome, and +when the greatest momentum during contact is reached. SB is the +primitive radius of the club tooth wheel, but both primitive and _real_ +radius of the ratchet wheel. The distance of centers of wheel and pallet +will be alike in both cases; also the lockings will be the same distance +apart on both pallets; therefore, when horologists, even if they have +worldwide reputations, claim that the club tooth has an advantage over +the ratchet because it begins the lift with a shorter lever than the +latter, it does not make it so. We are treating the subject from a +purely horological standpoint, and neither patriotism or prejudice has +anything to do with it. We wish to sift the matter thoroughly and arrive +at a just conception of the merits and defects of each form of +escapement, and show _reasons_ for our conclusions. + +[Illustration: Fig. 11.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 12.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 13.] + +Anyone who has closely followed our deductions must see that in so far +as the wheel is concerned the ratchet or English wheel has several +points in its favor. Such a wheel is inseparable from a wide pallet; but +we have seen that a narrower pallet is advisable; also as little drop +and lock as possible; clearly, we must effect a compromise. In other +words, so far the balance of our reasoning is in favor of the club tooth +escapement and to effect an intelligent division of angles for tooth, +pallet and lift is one of the great questions which confronts the +intelligent horologist. + +Anyone who has ever taken the pains to draw pallet and tooth with +different angles, through every stage of the lift, with both wide and +narrow pallets and teeth, in circular and equidistant escapements, will +have received an eye-opener. We strongly advise all our readers who are +practical workmen to try it after studying what we have said. We are +certain it will repay them. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +_The Center Distance of Wheel and Pallets._ The direction of pressure of +the wheel teeth should be through the pallet center by drawing the +tangents AC and AD, Fig. 2 to the primitive circle GH, at the +intersection of the angle FBE. This condition is realized in the +equidistant pallet. In the circular pallet, Fig. 3, this condition +cannot exist, as in order _to lock_ on a tangent the center distance +should be _greater_ for the engaging and _less_ for the disengaging +pallet, therefore watchmakers aim to go between the two and plant them +as before specified at A. + +When planted on the tangents the unlocking resistance will be less and +the impulse transmitted under favorable conditions, especially so in +the circular, as the direction of pressure coincides (close to the +center of the lift), with the law of the parallelogram of forces. + +It is _impossible_ to plant pallets on the tangents in very small +escapements, as there would not be enough room for a pallet arbor of +proper strength, nor will they be found planted on the tangents in the +medium size escapement with a long pallet arbor, nor in such a one with +a very wide tooth (see Fig. 4) as the heel would come so close to the +center A, that the solidity of pallets and arbor would suffer. We will +give an actual example. For a medium sized escape wheel with a primitive +diameter of 7.5 mm., the center distance AB is 4.33 mm. By using 3° of a +lifting angle on the teeth, the distance from the heel of the tooth to +the pallet center will be .4691 mm.; by allowing .1 mm. between wheel +and pallet and .15 mm. for stock on the pallets we find we will have a +pallet arbor as follows: .4691 - (.1 + .15) × 2 = .4382 mm. It would not +be practicable to make anything smaller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +It behooves us now to see that while a narrow pallet is advisable a very +wide tooth is not; yet these two are inseparable. Here is another case +for a compromise, as, unquestionably the pallets ought to be planted on +the tangents. There is no difficulty about it in the English lever, and +we have shown in our example that a judiciously planned club tooth +escapement of medium size can be made with the center distance properly +planted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +When considering the center distance we must of necessity consider the +widths of teeth and pallets and their lifting angles. We are now at a +point in which no watchmaker of intelligence would indicate one certain +division for these parts and claim it to be "the best." It is always +those who do not thoroughly understand a subject who are the first to +make such claims. We will, however, give our opinion within certain +limits. The angle to be divided for tooth and pallet is 10½°. Let us +divide it by 2, which would be the most natural thing to do, and examine +the problem. We will have 5¼° each for width of tooth and pallet. We +_must_ have a smaller lifting angle on the tooth than on the pallet, but +the wider the tooth the greater should its lifting angle be. It would +not be mechanical to make the tooth wide and the lifting angle small, as +the lifting plane on the pallets would be too steep on account of being +narrow. A lifting angle on the tooth which would be _exactly_ suitable +for a given circular, would be _too great_ for a given equidistant +pallet. It follows, therefore, taking 5¼° as a width for the tooth, that +while we could employ it in a fair sized escapement with equidistant +pallets, we could not do so with circular pallets and still have the +latter pitched on the tangents. We see the majority of escapements made +with narrower teeth than pallets, and for a very good reason. + +In the example previously given, the 3° lift on the tooth is well +adapted for a width of 4½°, which would require a pallet 6° in width. +The tooth, therefore, would be ¾ the width of pallets, which is very +good indeed. + +From what we have said it follows that a large number of pallets are not +planted on the tangents at all. We have never noticed this question in +print before. Writers generally seem to, in fact do, assume that no +matter how large or small the escapement may be, or how the pallets and +teeth are divided for width and lifting angle, no difficulty will be +found in locating the pallets on the tangents. Theoretically there is no +difficulty, but in practice we find there is. + +_Equidistant vs. Circular._ At this stage we are able to weigh the +circular against the equidistant pallet. In beginning this essay we had +to explain the difference between them, so the reader could follow our +discussion, and not until now, are we able to sum up our conclusions. + +The reader will have noticed that for such an important action as the +lift, which supplies power to the balance, the circular pallet is +favored from every point of view. This is a very strong point in its +favor. On the other hand, the unlocking resistance being less, and as +nearly alike as possible on both pallets in the equidistant, it is a +question if the total vibration of the balance will be greater with the +one than the other, although it will receive the impulse under better +conditions from the circular pallet; but it expends more force in +unlocking it. Escapement friction plays an important role in the +position and isochronal adjustments; the greater the friction +encountered the slower the vibration of the balance. The friction should +be constant. In unlocking, the equidistant comes nearer to fulfilling +this condition, while during the lift it is more nearly so in the +circular. The friction in unlocking, from a timing standpoint, +overshadows that of the impulse, and the tooth can be a little wider in +the equidistant than the circular escapement with the pallet properly +planted. Therefore for the _finest_ watches the equidistant escapement +is well adapted, but for anything less than that the circular should be +our choice. + +_The Fork and Roller Action._ While the lifting action of the lever +escapement corresponds to that of the cylinder, the fork and roller +action corresponds to the impulse action in the chronometer and duplex +escapements. + +Our experience leads us to believe that the action now under +consideration is but imperfectly understood by many workmen. It is a +complicated action, and when out of order is the cause of many annoying +stoppages, often characterized by the watch starting when taken from the +pocket. + +The action is very important and is generally divided into impulse and +safety action, although we think we ought to divide it into three, +namely, by adding that of the unlocking action. We will first of all +consider the impulse and unlocking actions, because we cannot +intelligently consider the one without the other, as the ruby pin and +the slot in the fork are utilized in each. The ruby pin, or strictly +speaking, the "impulse radius," is a lever arm, whose length is measured +from the center of the balance staff to the face of the ruby pin, and is +used, firstly, as a power or transmitting lever on the acting or +geometrical length of the fork (_i. e._, from the pallet center to the +beginning of the horn), and which at the moment is a resistance lever, +to be utilized in unlocking the pallets. After the pallets are unlocked +the conditions are reversed, and we now find the lever fork, through the +pallets, transmitting power to the balance by means of the impulse +radius. In the first part of the action we have a short lever engaging a +longer one, which is an advantage. See Fig. 14, where we have purposely +somewhat exaggerated the conditions. A'X represents the impulse radius +at present under discussion, and AW the acting length of the fork. It +will be seen that the shorter the impulse radius, or in other words, the +closer the ruby pin is to the balance staff and the longer the fork, the +easier will the unlocking of the pallets be performed, but this entails +a great impulse angle, for the law applicable to the case is, that the +angles are in the inverse ratio to the radii. In other words, the +shorter the radius, the greater is the angle, and the smaller the angle +the greater is the radius. We know, though, that we must have as small +an impulse angle as possible in order that the balance should be highly +detached. Here is one point in favor of a short impulse radius, and one +against it. Now, let us turn to the impulse action. Here we have the +long lever AW acting on a short one, A'X, which is a disadvantage. Here, +then, we ought to try and have a short lever acting on a long one, which +would point to a short fork and a great impulse radius. Suppose AP, +Fig. 14, is the length of fork, and A'P is the impulse radius; here, +then, we favor the impulse, and it is directly in accordance with the +theory of the free vibration of the balance, for, as before stated, the +longer the radius the smaller the angle. The action at P is also closer +to the line of centers than it is at W, which is another advantage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +We will notice that by employing a large impulse angle, and consequently +a short radius, the intersection _m_ of the two circles _ii_ and _cc_ is +very _safe_, whereas, with the conditions reversed in favor of the +impulse action, the intersection at _k_ is more delicate. We have now +seen enough to appreciate the fact that we favor one action at the +expense of another. + +By having a lifting angle on pallet and tooth of 8½°, a locking angle of +1½°, and a run of ½°, we will have an angular movement of the fork of +8½ + 1½ + ½ = 10½°. + +[Illustration: Fig. 15.] + +Writers generally only consider the movement of the fork from drop to +drop on the pallets, but we will be thoroughly practical in the matter. +With a total motion of the fork of 10½° (JAW, Fig. 15), one-half, or 5¼° +will be performed on each side of the line of centers. We are at liberty +to choose any impulse angle which we may prefer; 3 to 1 is a good +proportion for an ordinary well-made watch. By employing it, the angle +XA'Y would be equal to 31½°. The radius A'X Fig. 16, is also of the same +proportion, but the angle AA'X is greater because the fork angle WAA' is +greater than the same angle in Fig. 15. We will notice that the +intersection _k_ is much smaller in Fig. 15 than in Fig. 16. The action +in the latter begins much further from the line of centers than in the +former and outlines an action which should not be made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 16.] + +To come back to the impulse angle, some might use a proportion of 3.5, 4 +or even 5 to 1, while others for the finest of watches would only use +2.75 to 1. By having a total vibration of the balance of 1½ turns, which +is equal to 540° a fork angle of 10° and a proportion of 2.75 for the +impulse angle which would be equal to 10 × 2.75 = 27.5°. The _free_ +vibration of the balance, or as this is called, "the supplemental arc," +is equal to 540° - 27.5° = 512.50°, while with a proportion of 5 to 1, +making an impulse angle of 50°, it would be equal to 490°. To sum up, +the finer the watch the lower the proportion, the closer the action to +the line of centers, the smaller the friction. On account of leverage +the more difficult the unlocking but the more energetic the impulse when +it does occur. The velocity of the ruby pin at P; Fig. 14, is much +greater than at W, consequently it will not be overtaken as soon by the +fork as at W. The velocity of the fork at the latter point is greater +than at P; the intersection of _ii_ and _cc_ is also not as great; +therefore the lower the proportion the finer and more exact must the +workmanship be. + +We will notice that the unlocking action has been overruled by the +impulse. The only point so far in which the former has been favored is +in the diminished action before the line of centers, as previously +pointed out at P, Fig. 14. + +We will now consider the width of the ruby pin and to get a good insight +into the question, we will study Fig. 17. A is the pallet center, A' the +balance center, the line AA' being the line of centers; the angle WAA +equals half the total motion of the fork, the other half, of course, +taking place on the opposite side of the center line. WA is the _center_ +of the fork when it rests against the bank. The angle AA'X represents +half the impulse angle; the other half, the same as with the fork, is +struck on the other side of the center line. At the point of +intersection of these angles we will draw _cc_ from the pallet center A, +which equals the acting length of the fork, and from the balance center +we will draw _ii_, which equals the _theoretical_ impulse radius; some +writers use it as the _real_ radius. The wider the ruby pin the greater +will the latter be, which we will explain presently. + +The ruby pin in entering the fork must have a certain amount of freedom +for action, from 1 to 1¼°. Should the watch receive a jar at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent or passing hollow in the roller, the +fork would fly against the ruby pin. It is important that the angular +freedom between the fork and ruby pin at the moment it enters into the +slot be _less_ than the total locking angle on the pallets. If we employ +a locking angle of 1½° and ½° run, we would have a total lock on the +pallets of 2°. By allowing 1¼° of freedom for the ruby pin at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent, in case the fork should strike the +face of the ruby pin, the pallets will still be locked ¾° and the fork +drawn back against the bankings through the draft angle. + +We will see what this shake amounts to for a given acting length of +fork, which describes an arc of a circle, therefore the acting length is +only the radius of that circle and must be multiplied by two in order to +get the diameter. The acting length of fork = 4.5 mm., what is the +amount of shake when the ruby pin passes the acting corner? +4.5 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ 360° = .0785 × 1.25 = .0992 mm. The shake of the ruby +pin in the slot of the fork must be as slight as possible, consistent +with perfect freedom of action. It varies from ¼° to ½°, according to +length of fork and shape of ruby pin. A square ruby pin requires more +shake than any other kind; it enters the fork and receives the impulse +in a diagonal direction on the jewel, in which position it is +illustrated at Z, Fig. 20. This ruby pin acts on a knife edge, but for +all that the engaging friction during the unlocking action is +considerable. + +Our reasoning tells us it matters not if a ruby pin be wide or narrow, +it must have _the same_ freedom in passing the acting edge of the fork, +therefore, to have the impulse radius on the point of intersection of +A'X with AW, Fig. 17, we would require a _very_ narrow ruby pin. With 1° +of freedom at the edge, and ½° in the slot, we could only have a ruby +pin of a width of 1½°. Applying it to the preceding example it would +only have an actual width of .0785 × 1.5 = .1178 mm., or the size of an +ordinary balance pivot. At _n_, Fig. 17, we illustrate such a ruby pin; +the theoretical and real impulse radius coincide with one another. The +intersection of the circle _ii_ and _cc_ is very slight, while the +friction in unlocking begins within 1° of half the total movement of the +fork from the line of centers; to illustrate, if the angular motion is +11° the ruby pin under discussion will begin action 4½° before the line +of centers, being an engaging, or "uphill" friction of considerable +magnitude. + +[Illustration: Fig. 17.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 18.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 19.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 20.] + +The intersection with the fork is also much less than with the wider +ruby pin, making the impulse action very delicate. On the other hand the +widest ruby pin for which there is any occasion is one beginning the +unlocking action on the line of centers, Fig. 17; this entails a width +of slot equal to the angular motion of the fork. We see here the +advantage of a wide ruby pin over a narrow one in the unlocking action. +Let us now examine the question from the standpoint of the impulse +action. + +Fig. 18 illustrates the moment the impulse is transmitted; the fork has +been moved in the direction of the arrow by the ruby pin; the escapement +has been unlocked and the opposite side of the slot has just struck the +ruby pin. The exact position in which the impulse is transmitted varies +with the locking angle, the width of ruby pin, its shake in the slot, +the length of fork, its weight, and the velocity of the ruby pin, which +is determined by the vibrations of the balance and the impulse radius. + +In an escapement with a total lock of 1¾° and 1¼ of shake in the slot, +theoretically, the impulse would be transmitted 2° from the bankings. +The narrow ruby pin n receives the impulse on the line _v_, which is +closer to the line of centers than the line _u_, on which the large ruby +pin receives the impulse. Here then we have an advantage of the narrow +ruby pin over a wide one; with a wider ruby pin the balance is also more +liable to rebank when it takes a long vibration. Also on account of the +greater angle at which the ruby pin stands to the slot when the impulse +takes place, the _drop_ of the fork against the jewel will amount to +more than its shake in the slot (which is measured when standing on the +line of centers). On this account some watches have slots dovetailed in +form, being wider at the bottom, others have ruby pins of this form. +They require very exact execution; we think we can do without them by +judiciously selecting a width of ruby pin between the two extremes. We +would choose a ruby pin of a width equal to half the angular motion of +the fork. There is an ingenious arrangement of fork and roller which +aims to, and partially does, overcome the difficulty of choosing between +a wide and narrow ruby pin, it is known as the Savage pin roller +escapement. We intend to describe it later. + +If the face of the ruby pin were planted on the theoretical impulse +radius _ii_, Fig. 19, the impulse would end in a butting action as +shown; hence the great importance of distinguishing between the +theoretical and real impulse radius and establishing a reliable data +from which to work. We feel that these actions have never been properly +and thoroughly treated in simple language; we have tried to make them +plain so that anyone can comprehend them with a little study. + +Three good forms of ruby pins are the triangular, the oval and the flat +faced; for ordinary work the latter is as good as any, but for fine work +the triangular pin with the corners slightly rounded off is preferable. + +[Illustration: Fig. 21.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 23.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 22.] + +English watches are met with having a cylindrical or round ruby pin. +Such a pin should never be put into a watch. The law of the +parallelogram of forces is completely ignored by using such a pin; the +friction during the unlocking and impulse actions is too severe, as it +is, without the addition of so unmechanical an arrangement. Fig. 21 +illustrates the action of a round ruby pin; _ii_ is the path of the ruby +pin; _cc_ that of the acting length of the fork. It is shown at the +moment the impulse is transmitted. It will be seen that the impact takes +place _below_ the center of the ruby pin, whereas it should take place +at the center, as the motion of the fork is _upwards_ and that of the +ruby pin _downwards_ until the line of the centers has been reached. +The same rule applies to the flat-faced pin and it is important that the +right quantity be ground off. We find that 3/7 is approximately the +amount which should be ground away. Fig. 22 illustrates the fork +standing against the bank. The ruby pin touches the side of the slot but +has not as yet begun to act; _ri_ is the real impulse circle for which +we allow 1¼° of freedom at the acting edge of the fork; the face of the +ruby pin is therefore on this line. The next thing to do is to find the +center of the pin. From the side _n_ of the slot we construct the right +angle _o n t_; from _n_, we transmit ½ the width of the pin, and plant +the center _x_ on the line _n t_. We can have the center of the pin +slightly below this line, but in no case above it; but if we put it +below, the pin will be thinner and therefore more easily broken. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +_The Safety Action._ Although this action is separate from the impulse +and unlocking actions, it is still very closely connected with them, +much more so in the single than in the double roller escapement. If we +were to place the ruby pin at _X_, Fig. 14, we could have a much +smaller roller than by placing it at _P_. With the small roller the +safety action is more secure, as the intersection at _m_ is greater than +at _k_. It is not as liable to "butt" and the friction is less when the +guard point is thrown against the small roller. Suppose we take two +rollers, one with a diameter of 2.5 mm., the other just twice this +amount, of 5 mm. By having the guard radius and pressure the same in +each case, if the guard point touched the larger roller it would not +only have twice, but four times more effect than on the smaller one. We +will notice that the smaller the impulse angle the larger the roller, +because the ruby pin is necessarily placed farther from the center. The +position of the ruby pin should, therefore, govern the size of the +roller, which should be as small as possible. There should only be +enough metal left between the circumference of the roller and the face +of the jewel to allow for a crescent or passing hollow of sufficient +depth and an efficient setting for the jewel. For this reason, as well +as securing the correct impulse radius and therefore angle, when +replacing the ruby pin, and having it set securely and mechanically in +the roller, it is necessary that the pin and the hole in the roller be +of the same form, and a good fit. Fig. 23 illustrates the difference in +size of rollers. In the smaller one the conditions imposed are +satisfied, while in the larger one they are not. In the single roller +the safety action is at the mercy of the impulse and pallet angles. We +have noticed that in order to favor the impulse we require a large +roller, and for the safety action a small one, therefore escapements +made on fine principles are supplied with two rollers, one for each +action. + +It may be well to say that in our opinion a proportion between the fork +and impulse angles in 10° pallets of 3 or 3½ to 1, _depending_ upon the +size of the escapement, is the lowest which should be made in single +roller. We have seen them in proportions of 2 to 1 in single roller--a +scientific principle foolishly applied--resulting in an action entirely +unsatisfactory. + +When the guard point is pressed against the roller the escape tooth must +still rest on the locking face of the pallet; if the total lock is 2°, by +allowing 1¼° freedom for the guard point between the bank and the roller +the escapement will still be locked ¾°. How much this shake actually +amounts to depends upon the guard radius. Suppose this to be 4 mm., +then the freedom would equal 4 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.25 = .0873 mm. + +[Illustration: Fig. 24.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 25.] + +_The Crescent_ in the roller must be large and deep enough so it will be +impossible for the guard point to touch in or on the corners of it; at +the same time it must not be too large, as it would necessitate a longer +horn on the fork than is necessary. + +Fig. 24 shows the slot _n_ of the fork standing at the bank. The ruby +pin _o_ touches it, but has not as yet acted on it; _s s_ illustrates a +single roller, while S2 illustrates the safety roller for a double +roller escapement. In order to find the dimensions of the crescent in +the single roller we must proceed as follows: WA is in the center of the +fork when it rests against the bank, and is, therefore, one of the sides +of the fork angle, and is drawn from the pallet center; V A W is an +angle of 1¼°, which equals the freedom between the guard point and the +roller; _g g_ represents the path of the guard pin _u_ for the single +roller, and is drawn at the intersection of VA with the roller A' A2 is +a line drawn from the balance center through that of the ruby pin, and +therefore also passes through the center of the crescent. By planting a +compass on this line, where it cuts the periphery of the roller, and +locating the point of intersection of VA with the roller, will give us +one-half the crescent, the remaining half being transferred to the +opposite side of the line A' A2. We will notice that the guard point has +entered the crescent 1¼° before the fork begins to move. + +The angle of opening for the crescent in the double roller escapement is +greater than in the single, because it is placed closer to the balance +center, and the guard point or dart further from the pallet center, +causing a greater intersection; also the velocity of the guard point has +increased, while that of the safety roller has decreased. Fig. 24, at +_ff_, shows the path of the dart _h_, which also has 1¼° freedom between +bank and roller. From the balance center we draw A' _d_ touching the +center or point of the dart; from this point we construct at 5° angle +_b_ A' _d_. This is to ensure sufficient freedom for the dart when +entering the crescent. We plant a compass on the point of intersection +of A' A2 with the safety roller, S2, and locating the point where A'_b_ +intersects it, have found one-half the opening for the crescent, the +remaining half being constructed on the opposite side of the line A' A2. + +_The Horn_ on the fork belongs to the safety action: more horn is +required with the double than with the single roller, on account of the +greater angle of opening for the crescent. + +The horn should be of such a length that when the crescent has passed +the guard point, the end of the horn should point to at least the center +of the ruby pin. + +The dotted circle, _s s_, Fig. 25, represents a single roller. It will +be noticed that the corner of the crescent has passed the guard pin _u_ +by a considerable angle, and although this is so, in case of an accident +the _acting edge_ of the fork would come in contact with the ruby pin; +this proves that a well made single roller escapement really requires +but little horn, only enough to ensure the safe entry of the ruby pin in +case the guard point at that moment be thrown against the roller. We +will now examine the question from the standpoint of the double roller; +S2, Fig. 25, is the safety roller; the corner of the crescent has safely +passed the dart _h_; the centers of the ruby pin _o_ and of the crescent +being on the line A' A2, we plant the compass on the pallet center and +the center of the face of the ruby pin and draw _k k_, which will be the +path described by the horn. The end of the horn is therefore planted +upon it from 1½° to 1¾° from the ruby pin; this freedom at the end of +the horn is therefore from ¼° to ½° more than we allow for the guard +point; it depends upon the size of the escapement and locking angles +which we would choose. It must in any case be less than the lock on the +pallets, so that the fork will be drawn back against the bank in case +the horn be thrown against the ruby pin. + +When treating on the width of the ruby pin, we mentioned the Savage pin +roller escapement, which we illustrate in Figs. 26 and 27. This +ingenious arrangement was designed with the view of combining the +advantages of both wide and narrow pins and at the same time without any +of their disadvantages. + +In Fig. 26 we show the unlocking pins _u_ beginning their action on the +line of centers--the best possible point--in unlocking the escapement. +These pins were made of gold in all which we examined, although it is +recorded that wide ruby pins and ruby rollers have been used in this +escapement, which would be preferable. + +The functions of the two pins in the roller are simply to unlock the +escapement; the impulse is not transmitted to them as is the case in the +ordinary fork and roller action. In this action the guard pin _i_ also +acts as the impulse pin. We will notice that the passing hollow in this +roller is a rectangular slot the same as in the ordinary fork. When the +escapement is being unlocked the guard pin _i_ enters the hollow and +when the escape tooth comes into contact with the lifting plane of the +pallet the pin _i_, Fig. 27, transmits the impulse to the roller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 26.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +The impulse is transmitted closer to the line of centers than could be +done with any ruby pin. If the pin _i_ were wider the impulse would be +transmitted still closer to the line of centers, but the intersection of +it with the roller would be less. It is very delicate as it is, +therefore from a practical standpoint it ought to be made thin but +consistent with solidity. If the pin is anyway large, it should be +flattened on the sides, otherwise the friction would be similar to that +of the round ruby pin. It would also be preferable (on account of the +pin _i_ being very easily bent) to make the impulse piece narrow but of +such a length that it could be screwed to the fork, the same as the dart +in the double roller. The impulse radius is also the radius of the +roller, because the impulse is transmitted to the roller itself; for +this reason the latter is smaller in this action than in the ordinary +one having the same angles; also a shorter lever is in contact with a +longer one in the unlocking than in ordinary action of the same angles; +but for all this the pins _u u_ should be pitched close to the edge of +the roller, as the angular connection of the balance with the escapement +would be increased during the unlocking action. This escapement being +very delicate requires a 12° pallet angle and a proportion between +impulse and pallet angles of not less than 3 to 1, which would mean an +impulse angle of 36°; this, together with the first rate workmanship +required are two of the reasons why this action is not often met with. + +George Savage, of London, England, invented this action. He was a +watchmaker who, in the early part of this century, did much to perfect +the lever escapement by good work and nice proportion, besides inventing +the two pin variety. He spent the early part of his life in Clerkenwell, +but in his old days emigrated to Canada, and founded a flourishing +retail business in Montreal, where he died. Some of George Savage's +descendants are still engaged at the trade in Canada at the present day. + +The correct delineation of the lever escapement is a very important +matter. We illustrate one which is so delineated that it can be +practically produced. We have not noticed a draft of the lever +escapement, especially with equidistant pallets and club teeth, which +would act correctly in a watch. + +We have been aggressive in our work and have sometimes found theories +propounded and elongated which of themselves were not right; this may +have something to do with it, that we so often hear workmen say, "Theory +is no use, because if you work according to it your machine will not +run." We say, "No, sir, if your theory is not right in itself, then your +work will certainly not be correct; but if your theory be correct then +your work _must_ be correct. Why? it simply cannot be otherwise." We +will give it another name; let us say, apply sense, reason, thought, +experience and study to your work, and what have you done? You have +simply applied theory. + +A theorem is a proposition to be proved, not being able to prove it, we +must simply change it according as our experience dictates, this is +precisely what we have done with the escapement after having followed +the deductions of recognized authorities with the result that we can now +illustrate an escapement which has been thoroughly subjected to an +impartial analysis in every respect, and which is theoretically and +practically correct. + +We will not only give instructions for drafting the escapement now under +consideration, but will also make explanations how to draft it in +different positions, also in circular pallet and single roller. We are +convinced that by so doing we will do a service to many, we also wish to +avoid what we may call "the stereotyped" process, that is, one which may +be acquired by heart, but introduce any changes and perplexity is the +result. It is really not a difficult matter to draft escapements in +different positions, as an example will show. + +Before making a draft we must know exactly what we wish to produce. It +is well in drafting escapements to make them as large as possible, say +thirty to forty times larger than in the watch, in the present case the +size is immaterial, but we must have specifications for the proportions +of the angles. Our draft is to be the most difficult subject in lever +escapements; it is to be represented just as if it were working in a +watch; it is to represent a good and reliable action in every respect, +one which can be applied without special difficulty to a good watch, and +is to be "up to date" in every particular and to contain the majority +of the best points and conclusions reached in our analysis. + +_Specifications for Lever Escapement_: The pallets are to be +equidistant; the wheel teeth of the "club" form; there are to be two +rollers; wheel, pallet, and balance centers are to be in straight line. +The lock is to be 1½°, the run ¼°, making a total lock of 1¾°; the +movement of pallets from drop to drop is to be 10°, while the fork is to +move through 10¼° from bank to bank; the lift on the wheel teeth is to +be 3°, while the remainder is to be the lift on the pallets as follows: +10¼ - (1¾ + 3) = 5½° for lift of pallets. + +The wheel is to have 15 teeth, with pallets spanning 3 teeth or 2½ +spaces, making the angle from lock to lock = 360 ÷ 15 × 2½ = 60°, the +interval from tooth to tooth is 360 ÷ 15 = 24°; divided by 2 +pallets = 24 ÷ 2 = 12° for width of tooth, pallet and drop; drop is to +be 1½°, the tooth is to be ¾ the width of the pallet, making a tooth of +a width of 4½° and a pallet of 6°. + +The draw is to be 12° on each pallet, while the locking faces of the +teeth are to incline 24°. The acting length of fork is to be equal to +the distance of centers of scape wheel and pallets; the impulse angle +is to be 28°; freedom from dart and safety, roller is to be 1¼°, and +for dart and corner of crescent 5°; freedom for ruby pin and acting +edge of fork is to be 1¼°; width of slot is to be ½ the total motion, +or 10¼ ÷ 2 = 5 1/8°; shake of ruby pin in slot = ¼°, leaving +5 1/8 - ¼ = 4 7/8° for width of ruby pin. + +Radius of safety roller to be 4/7 of the theoretical impulse radius. The +length of horn is to be such that the end would point at least to the +center of the ruby pin when the edge of the crescent passes the dart; +space between the end of horn and ruby pin is to be 1½°. + +It is well to know that the angles for width of teeth, pallets and drop +are measured from the wheel center, while the lifting and locking angles +are struck from the pallet center, the draw from the locking corners of +the pallets, and the inclination of the teeth from the locking edge. + +In the fork and roller action, the angle of motion, the width of slot, +the ruby pin and its shake, the freedom between dart and roller, of ruby +pin with acting edge of fork and end of horn are all measured from the +pallet center, while the impulse angle and the crescent are measured +from the balance center. A sensible drawing board measures 17 × 24 +inches, we also require a set of good drawing instruments, the finer the +instruments the better; pay special attention to the compasses, pens and +protractor; add to this a straight ruler and set square. + +The best all-round drawing paper, both for India ink and colored work +has a rough surface; it must be fastened firmly and evenly to the board +by means of thumb tacks; the lines must be light and made with a hard +pencil. Use Higgins' India ink, which dries rapidly. + +[Illustration] + +We will begin by drawing the center line A' A B; use the point B for the +escape center; place the compass on it and strike G H, the primitive or +geometrical circle of the escape wheel; set the center of the protractor +at B and mark off an angle of 30° on each side of the line of centers; +this will give us the angles A B E and A B F together, forming the angle +F B E of 60°, which represents from lock to lock of the pallets. Since +the chord of the angle of 60° is equal to the radius of the circle, this +gives us an easy means of verifying this angle by placing the compass at +the points of intersection of F B and E B with the primitive circle G H; +this distance must be equal to the radius of the circle. At these points +we will construct right angles to E B and F B, thus forming the tangents +C A and D A to the primitive circle G H. These tangents meet on the line +of centers at A, which will be the pallet center. Place the compass at A +and draw the locking circle M N at the points of intersection of E B and +F B with the primitive circle G H. The locking edges of the pallets will +always stand on this circle no matter in what relation the pallets +stand to the wheel. Place the center of the protractor at B and draw the +angle of width of pallets of 6°; I B E being for the engaging and J B F +for the disengaging pallet. In the equidistant pallet I B is drawn on +the side towards the center, while J B is drawn further from the center. +If we were drawing a circular pallet, one-half the width of pallets +would be placed on each side of E B and F B. At the points of +intersection of I B and J B with the primitive circle G H we draw the +path O for the discharging edge of the engaging and P for that of the +disengaging pallet. The total lock being 1¾°, we construct V' A at this +angle from C A; the point of intersection of V' A with the locking +circle M N, is the position of the locking corner of the engaging +pallet. The pallet having 12° draw when locked we place the center of +the protractor on this corner and draw the angle Q M E. Q M will be the +locking face of the engaging pallet. If the face of the pallet were on +the line E B there would be no draw, and if placed to the opposite side +of E B the tooth would repel the pallet, forming what is known as the +repellant escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +Having shown how to delineate the locking face of the engaging pallet +when locked, we will now consider how to draft both it and the +disengaging pallet in correct positions when unlocked; to do so we +direct our attention until further notice to Fig. 28. The locking faces +Q M of the engaging and S N of the disengaging pallets are shown in +dotted lines _when locked_. We must now consider the relation which the +locking faces will bear to E B in the engaging, and to F B in the +disengaging pallets when unlocked. This is a question of some +importance; it is easy enough to represent the 12° from the 30° angles +when locked; we must be certain that they would occupy exactly that +position and yet show them unlocked; we shall take pains to do so. In +due time we shall show that there is no appreciable loss of lift on the +engaging pallet in the escapement illustrated; the angle T A V +therefore shows the total lift; we have not shown the corresponding +angles on the disengaging side because the angles are somewhat +different, but the total lift is still the same. G H represents the +primitive circle of the escape wheel, and X Z that of the real, while +M N represents the circular course which the locking corners of the +pallets take in an equidistant escapement. At a convenient position we +will construct the circle C C' D from the pallet center A. Notice the +points _e_ and _c_, where V A and T A intersect this circle; the space +between _e_ and _c_ represents the extent of the motion of the pallets +at this particular distance from the center A; this being so, then let +us apply it to the engaging pallet. At the point of intersection _o_ of +the dotted line Q M (which is an extended line on which the face of the +pallet lies when locked), with the circle C C' D, we will plant our +dividers and transfer _e c_ to _o n_. By setting our dividers on _o_ M +and transferring to _n_ M', we will obtain the location of Q' M', the +locking face when unlocked. Let us now turn our attention to the +disengaging pallet. The dotted line S N represents the location of the +locking face of the disengaging pallet when locked at an angle of 12° +from F B. At the intersection of S N with the circle C C' D we obtain +the point _j_. The motion of the two pallets being equal, we transfer +the distance _e c_ with the dividers from _j_ and obtain the point _l_. +By setting the dividers on _j_ N and transferring to _l_ N' we draw the +line S' N' on which the locking face of the disengaging pallet will be +located when unlocked. It will be perfectly clear to anyone that through +these means we can correctly represent the pallets in any desired +position. + +We will notice that the face Q' M' of the engaging pallet when unlocked +stands at a greater angle to E B than it did when locked, while the +opposite is the case on the disengaging pallet, in which the angle +S' N' F is much less than S N F. This shows that the _deeper_ the +engaging pallet locks, the lighter will the draw be, while the opposite +holds good with the disengaging pallet; also, that the draw increases +during the unlocking of the engaging, and decreases during the unlocking +of the disengaging pallet. These points show that the draw should be +measured with the _fork standing against the bank_; not when the locking +corner of the pallet stands on the primitive circle, as is so often +done. The recoil of the wheel (which determines the draw), is +illustrated by the difference between the locking circle M N and the +face Q M for the engaging, and S N for the disengaging pallet, and along +the _acting_ surface it is alike on each pallet, showing that the draft +angle should be the same on each pallet. + +A number of years ago we constructed the escapement model which we +herewith illustrate. All the parts are adjustable; the pallets can be +moved in any direction, the draft angles can be changed at will. Through +this model we can practically demonstrate the points of which we have +spoken. Such a model can be made by workmen after studying these +papers. + +[Illustration] + +In both the equidistant and circular pallets the locking face S N of the +disengaging pallet deviates more from the locking circle M N than does +the locking face Q M of the engaging pallet, as will be seen in the +diagram. This is because the draft angle is struck from E B which +deviates from the locking circle in such a manner, that if the face of a +pallet were planted on it and _locked deep enough_ to show it, the +wheel would actually _repel_ the pallet, whereas with the disengaging +pallet if it were planted on F B, it would actually produce draw if +locked very deep; this is on account of the natural deviation of the 30° +lines from the locking circle. This difference is more pronounced in the +circular than in the equidistant pallet, because in the former we have +two locking circles, the larger one being for the engaging pallet, and +as an arc of a large circle does not deviate as much from a straight +line as does that of a smaller circle, it will be easily understood that +the natural difference before spoken of is only enhanced thereby. For +this reason in order to produce an _actual_ draw of 12°, the engaging +pallet may be set at a slightly greater angle from E B in the circular +escapement; the amount depends upon the width of the pallets; the +requirements are that the recoil of the wheel will be the same on each +pallet. We must, however, repeat that one of the most important points +is to measure the draw when the fork stands against the bank, thereby +_increasing_ the draw on the engaging and _decreasing_ that of the +disengaging pallet _during_ the unlocking action, thus _naturally_ +balancing one fault with another. + +We will again proceed with the delineation of the escapement here +illustrated. After having drawn the locking face Q M, we draw the angle +of width of teeth of 4½°, by planting the protractor on the escape +center B. We measure the angle E B K, from the locking face of the +pallet; the line E B does not touch the locking face of the pallet at +the present time of contact with the tooth, therefore a line must be +drawn from the point of contact to the center B. We did so in our +drawing but do not illustrate it, as in a reduced engraving of this kind +it would be too close to E B and would only cause confusion. We will now +draw in the lifting angle of 3° for the tooth. From the tangent C A we +draw T A at the required angle; at the point of intersection of T A with +the 30° line E B we have the real circumference of the escape wheel. It +will only be necessary to connect the locking edge of the tooth with the +line K B, where the real or outer circle intersects it. It must be drawn +in the same manner in the circular escapement; if the tooth were drawn +up to the intersection of K B with T A, the lift would be too great, as +that point is further from the center A than the points of contact are. + +If the real or outer circle of the wheel intersects both the locking +circle M N and the path O of the discharging edge at the points where +T A intersects them, then there will be _no loss_ of lift on the +engaging pallet. This is precisely how it is in the diagram; but if +there is any deviation, then the angle of loss must be measured on the +_real_ diameter of the wheel and not on the primitive, as is usually +done, as the real diameter of the wheel, or in other words the heel of +the tooth, forms the last point of contact. With a wider tooth and a +greater lifting angle there will even be a _gain_ of lift on the +engaging pallet; the pallet in such a case would actually require a +smaller lifting angle, according to the amount of gain. We gave full +directions for measuring the loss when describing its effects in Fig. 8. +Whatever the loss amounts to, it is added to the lifting plane of the +pallet. In the diagram under discussion there is no loss, consequently +the lifting angle on the pallet is to be 5½°. From V' A we draw V A at +the required angle; the point of intersection of V A with the path O +will be the discharging edge O. It will now only be necessary to connect +the locking corner M with it, and we have the lifting plane of the +pallet; the discharging side of the pallet is then drawn parallel to the +locking face and made a suitable length. We will now draw the locking +edges of the tooth by placing the center of the protractor on the +locking edge M and construct the angle B M M' of 24° and draw a circle +from the scape center B, to which the line M M' will be a tangent. We +will utilize this circle in drawing in the faces of the other teeth +after having spaced them off 24° apart, by simply putting a ruler on +the locking edges and on the periphery of the circle. + +We now construct W' A as a tangent to the outer circle of the wheel, +thus forming the lifting angle D A W' of 3° for the teeth; this +corresponds to the angle T A C on the engaging side. W' A touches the +outer circle of the wheel at the intersection of F B with it. We will +notice that there is considerable deviation of W' A from the circle at +the intersection of J B with it. At the intersecting of this point we +draw U A; the angle U A W' is the loss of lift. This angle must be added +to the lifting angle of the pallets; we see that in this action there is +no loss on the engaging pallet, but on the disengaging the loss amounts +to approximately 7/8° in the action illustrated. As we have allowed ¼° of +run for the pallets, the discharging edge P is removed at this angle +from U A; we do not illustrate it, as the lines would cause confusion +being so close together. The lifting angle on the pallet is measured +from the point P and amounts to 5½° + the angle of the loss; the angle +W A U embraces the above angles besides ¼° for run. If the locks are +equal on each pallet, it proves that the lifts are also equal. This +gives us a practical method of proving the correctness of the drawing; +to do so, place the dividers on the locking circle M N at the +intersection of T A and V A with it, as this is the extent of motion; +transfer this measurement to N, if the _actual_ lift is the same on each +pallet, the dividers will locate the point which the locking corner N +will occupy _when locked_; this, in the present case, will be at an +angle of 1¾° below the tangent D A. By this simple method, the +correctness of our proposition that the loss of lift should be measured +from the outside circle of the wheel, can be proven. We often see the +loss measured for the engaging pallet on the primitive circumference +G H, and on the real circumference for the disengaging; if one is right +then the other must be wrong, as there is a noticeable deviation of the +tangent C A from the primitive circle G H at the intersection of the +locking circle M N; had we added this amount to the lifting angle V' A V +of the engaging pallet, the result would have been that the discharging +edge O would be over 1° below its present location, thus showing that by +the time the lift on the engaging pallet had been completed, the locking +corner N of the disengaging pallet would be locked at an angle of 2¾° +instead of only 1¾°. Many watches contain precisely this fault. If we +wish to make a draft showing the pallets at any desired position, at the +center of motion for instance, with the fork standing on the line of +centers, we would proceed in the following manner: 10¼° being the total +motion, one-half would equal 5 1/8°; as the total lock equals 1¾°, we +deduct this amount from it which leaves 5 1/8 - 1¾ = 3 3/8°, which is the +angle at which the locking corner M should be shown above the tangent +C A. Now let us see where the locking corner N should stand; M having +moved up 5 1/8°, therefore N moved down by that amount, the lift on the +pallet being 5½° and on the tooth 3° (which is added to the tangent +D A), it follows that N should stand 5½ + 3 - 5 1/8 = 3 3/8° above D A. +We can prove it by the lock, namely: 3 3/8° + 1¾ = 5 1/8°, half the +remaining motion. This shows how simple it is to draft pallets in +various positions, remembering always to use the tangents to the +primitive circle as measuring points. We have fully explained how to +draw in the draft angle on the pallets when unlocked, and do not require +to repeat it, except to say, that most authorities draw a tangent R N to +the locking circle M N, forming in other words, the right angle R N A, +then construct an angle of 12° from R N. We have drawn ours in by our +own method, which is the correct one. While we here illustrate S N R at +an angle of 12° it is in reality _less_ than that amount; had we +constructed S N at an angle of 12° from R N, then the draw would be 12° +from F B, when the primitive circumference of the wheel is reached, but +_more_ than 12° when the fork is against the bank. + +The space between the discharging edge P and the heel of the tooth forms +the angle of drop J B I of 1½°; the definition for drop is that it is +the freedom for wheel and pallet. This is not, strictly speaking, +perfectly correct, as, during the unlocking action there will be a +recoil of the wheel to the extent of the draft angle; the heel of the +tooth will therefore approach the edge P, and the discharging side of +the pallet approaches the tooth, as only the discharging edge moves on +the path P. + +A good length for the teeth is 1/10 the diameter of the wheel, measured +from the primitive diameter and from the locking edge of the tooth. + +The backs of the teeth are hollowed out so as not to interfere with the +pallets, and are given a nice form; likewise the rim and arms are drawn +in as light and as neat as possible, consistent with strength. + +Having explained the delineation of the wheel and pallet action we will +now turn our attention to that of the fork and roller. We tried to +explain these actions in such a manner that by the time we came to +delineate them no difficulty would be found, as in our analysis we +discussed the subject sufficiently to enable any one of ordinary +intelligence to obtain a correct knowledge of them. The fork and roller +action in straight line, right, or any other angle is delineated after +the methods we are about to give. + +We specified that the acting length of fork was to be equal to the +center distance of wheel and pallets; this gives a fork of a fair +length. + +Having drawn the line of centers A' A we will construct an angle equal +to half the angular motion of the pallets; the latter in the case under +consideration being 10¼°, therefore 5 1/8° is spaced off on each side of +the line of centers, forming the angles _m_ A _k_ of 10¼°. Placing our +dividers on A B the center distance of 'scape wheel and pallets, we +plant them on A and construct _c c_; thus we will have the acting length +of fork and its path. We saw in our analysis that the impulse angle +should be as small as possible. We will use one of 28° in our draft of +the double roller; we might however remark that this angle should vary +with the construction of the escapements in different watches; if too +small, the balance may be stopped when the escapement is locked, while +if too great it can be stopped during the lift; both these defects are +to be avoided. The angles being respectively 10¼° and 28° it follows +they are of the following proportions: 28° ÷ 10.25 = 2.7316. The impulse +radius therefore bears this relation (but in the inverse ratio to the +angles), to the acting length of fork. + +We will put it in the following proportion; let A_c_ equal acting length +of fork, and _x_ the unknown quantity; 28:10.25 :: A_c_:_x_; the answer +will be the theoretical impulse radius. Having found the required radius +we plant one jaw of our measuring instrument on the point of +intersection of _c c_ with _k_ A or _m_ A and locate the other jaw on +the line of centers; we thus obtain A' the balance center. Through the +points of intersection before designated we will draft X A' and Y A' +forming the impulse angle X A' Y of 28°. At the intersection of this +angle with the fork angle _k_ A' _m_, we draw _i i_ from the center A; +this gives us the theoretical impulse circle. The total lock being 1¾° +it follows that the angle described by the balance in unlocking += 1¾ × 2.7316 = 4.788°. According to the specifications the width of +slot is to be 5 1/8°; placing the center of the protractor on A we +construct half of this angle on each side of _k_ A, which passes through +the center of the fork when it rests against the bank; this gives us the +angle _s_ A _n_ of 5 1/8°. If the disengaging pallet were shown locked then +_m_ A would represent the center of the fork. The slot is to be made of +sufficient depth so there will be no possibility of the ruby pin +touching the bottom of it. The ruby pin is to have 1¼° freedom in +passing the acting edge of the fork; from the center A we construct the +angle _t_ A _n_ of 1¼°; at the point of intersection of _t_ A with _c c_ +the acting radius of the fork, we locate the real impulse radius and +draw the arc _ri ri_ which describes the path made by the face of the +ruby pin. The ruby pin is to have ¼° of shake in the slot; it will +therefore have a width of 4 7/8°; this width is drawn in with the ruby pin +imagined as standing over the line of centers and is then transferred to +the position which the ruby pin is to occupy in the drawing. + +The radius of the safety roller was given as 4/7 of the theoretical +impulse radius. They may be made of various proportions; thus 2/3 is often +used. Remember that the smaller we make it, the less the friction during +accidental contact with the guard pin, the greater must the passing +hollow be and the horn of fork and guard point must be longer, which +increases the weight of the fork. + +Having drawn in the safety roller, and having specified that the freedom +between the dart and safety roller was to be 1¼°, the dart being in the +center of the fork, consequently _k_ A is the center of it; therefore we +construct the angle _k_ A X of 1¼°. At the point of intersection of X A +with the safety roller we draw the arc _g g_; this locates the point of +the dart which we will now draw in. We will next draw _d_ A' from the +balance center and touching the point of the dart; we now construct +_b_ A' at an angle of 5° to it. This is to allow the necessary freedom +for the dart when entering the crescent; from A' we draw a line through +the center of the ruby pin. We do not show it in the drawing, as it +would be indiscernible, coming very close to A' X. This line will also +pass through the center of the crescent. At the point of intersection of +A' _b_ with the safety roller we have one of the edges of the crescent. By +placing our compass at the center of the crescent on the periphery of +the roller and on the edge which we have just found, it follows that our +compass will span the radius of the crescent. We now sweep the arc for +the latter, thus also drawing in the remaining half of the crescent on +the other side of A' X and bringing the crescent of sufficient depth +that no possibility exists of the dart touching in or on the edges of +it. We will now draw in the impulse roller and make it as light as +possible consistent with strength. A hole is shown through the impulse +roller to counterbalance the reduced weight at the crescent. When +describing Fig. 24, we gave instructions for finding the dimensions of +crescent and position of guard pin for the single roller. We will find +the length of horn; to do so we must closely follow directions given for +Fig. 25. In locating the end of the horn, we must find the location of +the center of the crescent and ruby pin _after_ the edge of the crescent +has passed the dart. From the point of intersection of A' _b_ with the +safety roller we transfer the radius of the crescent on the periphery of +the safety roller towards the side against the bank, then draw a line +from A' through the point so found. At point of intersection of this +line with the real impulse circle _r i r i_ we draw an arc radiating +from the pallet center; the end of the horn will be located on this arc. +In our drawing the arc spoken of coincides with the dart radius _g g_. +As before pointed out, we gave particulars when treating on Fig. 25, +therefore considered it unnecessary to further complicate the draft by +the addition of all the constructional lines. We specified that the +freedom between ruby pin and end of horn was to be 1½°; these lines, +(which we do not show) are drawn from the pallet center. Having +located the end of the horn on the side standing against the bank, we +place the dividers on it and on the point of intersection of _k_ A with +_g g_--which in this case is on the point of the dart,--and transfer +this measurement along _g g_ which will locate the end of the horn on +the opposite side. + +We have the acting edges of the fork on _cc_ and have also found the +position of the ends of the horns; their curvature is drawn in the +following manner: We place our compasses on A and _r i_, spanning +therefore the real impulse radius; the compass is now set on the acting +edge of the fork and an arc swept with it which is then to be +intersected by another arc swept from the end of the horn, on the same +side of the fork. At the point of intersection of the arcs the compass +is planted and the curvature of the horn drawn in, the same operation is +to be repeated with the other horn. We will now draw in the sides of the +horn of such a form that should the watch rebank, the side of the ruby +pin will squarely strike the fork. If the back of the ruby pin strikes +the fork there will be a greater tendency of breaking it and injuring +the pivots on account of acting like a wedge. The fork and pallets are +now drawn in as lightly as possible and of such form as to admit of +their being readily poised. The banks are to be drawn at equal distances +from the line of centers. In delineating the fork and roller action in +any desired position, it must be remembered that the points of location +of the real impulse radius, the end of horn, the dart or guard pin and +crescent, must _all_ be obtained _when standing against the bank_, and +the arcs drawn which they describe; the parts are then located according +to the angle at which they are removed from the banks. + +We think the instructions given are ample to enable any one to master +the subject. We may add that when one becomes well acquainted with the +escapement, many of the angles radiating from a common center, may be +drawn in at once. We had intended describing the mechanical construction +of the escapement, which does unmistakably present some difficulties on +account of the small dimensions of the parts, but nevertheless it can be +mechanically executed true to the principles enumerated. We have evolved +a method of so producing them that young men in a comparatively short +period have made them from their drafts (without automatic machinery) +that their watches start off when run down the moment the crown is +touched. Perhaps later on we will write up the subject. It is our +intention of doing so, as we make use of such explanations in our +regular work. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by +H. R. Playtner + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + +***** This file should be named 21978-8.txt or 21978-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/1/9/7/21978/ + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/21978-8.zip b/21978-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fd3b1c --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-8.zip diff --git a/21978-h.zip b/21978-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..82fdfcd --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h.zip diff --git a/21978-h/21978-h.htm b/21978-h/21978-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c4b6d97 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/21978-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2309 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <link rel="schema.DC" href="http://dublincore.org/documents/1998/09/dces/" /> + <meta name="author" content="H. R. Playtner" /> + <meta name="DC.Creator" content="H. R. Playtner" /> + <meta name="DC.Title" content="An Analysis of the Lever Escapement" /> + <meta name="DC.Date" content="2007" /> + <meta name="DC.Language" content="en" /> + + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by H. R. Playtner. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- +body{ margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } +p { margin-top: .75em; + margin-bottom: .75em; + line-height:1.3; + } +a:link { color:#0000d0; } +.num { + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: 13px; /* same appearance for pagenums in <h> */ + font-weight: normal; /* regular <p> or in the index */ + font-variant:normal; font-style:normal; + text-indent: 0em; text-align:right; + color: #585858; /* Contrast & brightness ok */ + background-color: #FFF; + white-space:nowrap; + } +span[title].num:after { + content: "[" attr(title) "] "; + } +/* ACCESS */ +a:focus, a:active { outline:#ffee66 solid 2px; background-color:#ffee66;} +a:focus img, a:active img {outline: #ffee66 solid 2px; } + +/* HEADINGS ETC */ +p.title {font-size: 120%; + text-align:center; + font-weight:bold; + text-indent:0; + } +small { font-size:60%;} +h1,h2 { text-align: center; + clear: both; } +h2.run { text-align:left; font-weight:normal; + font-style:italic; font-size:100%; + display:run-in; } +hr { width:65%; + margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom:2em; + margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; + clear: both; } +hr.minor { width:5em; margin-top:0.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em;} + +/* STYLES */ +.center { text-align: center; text-indent:0; + margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; } +.smcap {font-variant:small-caps;} +i { font-variant: normal; } +dfn, var, em { font-style:italic; } +var { speak: spell-out; white-space:nowrap;} +var.cap {font-style:normal; } +abbr { text-decoration:none; border:none; + font-variant:normal; + white-space:nowrap;} +sup { vertical-align:baseline; + position:relative; bottom:0.4em; + font-size: .75em; } +sub { vertical-align:top; + position:relative; top:0.4em; + font-size: .75em; } + + +/* IMAGES */ +img { border: none; padding: 0; margin: 0; } +p.caption {margin-top:2px; margin-bottom:0.5em; + font-size:smaller; + line-height:1.2; + text-align:center;} +.figcenter {margin: 0.5em auto 0 auto; text-align: center;} +.figcenter + p { clear:both; } +.figleft {float: left; clear: left; + margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; + } +.figright {float: right; clear: right; + margin: 1em 0 1em 1em; + } + +/* TRANSNOTES */ +ins.corr { text-decoration:none; + border-bottom: thin dotted gray; } +.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:smaller; + padding:0.5em; + margin-bottom:5em; + font-family:sans-serif, serif; } +.transnote strong { font-weight:bold; } + +/* LISTS */ +li { margin-top: 0.5em; + line-height: 1.2em; + padding-left:0; margin-left:1.5em;} +.off {list-style-type:none; } +--> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +Project Gutenberg's An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by H. R. Playtner + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: An Analysis of the Lever Escapement + +Author: H. R. Playtner + +Release Date: June 30, 2007 [EBook #21978] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + + + + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + +<div class="transnote"> +<h4 class="center">Transcriber’s note</h4> + +<p><strong>Printer errors:</strong> A small number of printer errors have been corrected. These are marked by light underlining and a title attribute which can be accessed by hovering with the mouse. For example, <ins class="corr" title="Original read ‘txet.’">text</ins>. + +In addition, some punctuation errors have been corrected, but inconsistent spacing of letter names referring to diagrams has been left as in the original.</p> + +<p><strong>Table of Contents:</strong> For the reader’s convenience, a <a href="#contents">Table of Contents</a> has been provided after the Preface. This was not in the original.</p> + + +<p><strong>Accessibility:</strong> Abbreviations have been expanded using the <abbr> tag. Unfortunately it proved impossible to provide long descriptions for the diagrams, because the originals were unclear or illegible. The following accesskeys are provided:</p> + +<ul class="off"> + +<li><a name="accesskeys" id="accesskeys"></a>0 <a href="#accesskeys" accesskey="0">This list of accesskeys</a></li> + +<li>1 <a href="#start" accesskey="1">Start of book</a></li> + +<li>2 <a href="#AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_LEVER_ESCAPEMENT" accesskey="2">Skip book’s frontmatter.</a></li> + +<li>3 <a href="#contents" rel="contents" accesskey="3">Table of Contents</a></li> + +</ul> +</div> + + + + +<hr /> +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="start" id="start"></a> +<img src="images/frontis.jpg" width="400" height="510" alt="Frontispiece." /> +<p class="caption">THOMAS MUDGE<br /> +<i>The first Horologist who successfully applied the Detached Lever +Escapement to Watches.<br /> +Born 1715—Died 1794.</i> +</p> +</div> + + +<hr /> +<h1><a name="AN_ANALYSIS" id="AN_ANALYSIS"></a><span class="num" title="Page 1"> </span><a name="p1" id="p1"></a>AN ANALYSIS +<br /> +<small>OF THE</small> +<br /> +<big class="smcap">Lever Escapement</big></h1> + +<hr class="minor" /> +<p class="title">BY H. R. PLAYTNER.</p> +<hr class="minor" /> + +<p class="title" style="margin-top:3em; margin-bottom:3em;">A LECTURE DELIVERED BEFORE THE CANADIAN WATCHMAKERS’ AND RETAIL +JEWELERS’ ASSOCIATION.</p> +<hr class="minor" /> +<p class="title">ILLUSTRATED.</p> +<hr class="minor" /> + +<p class="title" style="margin-top:3em;">CHICAGO: +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Hazlitt & Walker, Publishers.</span> +<br /> +1910.<span class="num" title="Page 2"> </span><a name="p2" id="p2"></a></p> + + + +<hr /> +<h2><a name="PREFACE" id="PREFACE"></a><span class="num" title="Page 3"> </span><a name="p3" id="p3"></a>PREFACE.</h2> + + +<p>Before entering upon our subject proper, we think it advisable to +explain a few points, simple though they are, which might cause +confusion to some readers. Our experience has shown us that as soon as +we use the words “millimeter” and “degree,” perplexity is the result. +“What is a millimeter?” is propounded to us very often in the course of +a year; nearly every new acquaintance is interested in having the metric +system of measurement, together with the fine gauges used, explained to +him.</p> + +<p>The metric system of measurement originated at the time of the French +Revolution, in the latter part of the 18th century; its divisions are +decimal, just the same as the system of currency we use in this country.</p> + +<p>A meter is the ten millionth part of an arc of the meridian of Paris, +drawn from the equator to the north pole; as compared with the English +inch there are <abbr title="39 and 3708 ten-thousandths">39<sup>3708</sup>⁄<sub>10000</sub></abbr> inches in a meter, and there are +25.4 millimeters in an inch.</p> + +<p>The meter is sub-divided into decimeters, centimeters and millimeters; +1,000 millimeters equal one meter; the millimeter is again divided into +<abbr title="tenths">10ths</abbr> and the <abbr title="tenths">10ths</abbr> into <abbr title="hundredths">100ths</abbr> of a millimeter, which could be +continued indefinitely. The <abbr title="1 hundredth of a"><sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>100</sub></abbr> millimeter is equal to the <abbr title="1 two thousand five hundred and fortieth"><sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>2540</sub></abbr> of +an inch. These are measurements with which the watchmaker is concerned. +<abbr title="1 hundredth of a"><sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>100</sub></abbr> millimeter, written <abbr title="point zero one em em">.01 mm.</abbr>, is the side shake for a balance +pivot; multiply it by <abbr title="2 and a quarter">2¼</abbr> and we obtain the thickness for the spring +detent of a pocket chronometer, which is about <abbr title="one third of">⅓</abbr> the thickness of a +human hair.</p> + +<p>The metric system of measurement is used in all the watch factories of +Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United States, and nearly all the +lathe makers number their chucks by it, and some of them cut the leading +screws on their slide rests to it.</p> + +<p><span class="num" title="Page 4"> </span><a name="p4" id="p4"></a>In any modern work on horology of value, the metric system is used. +Skilled horologists use it on account of its <em>convenience</em>. The +millimeter is a unit which can be handled on the small parts of a watch, +whereas the inch must always be divided on anything smaller than the +plates.</p> + +<p>Equally as fine gauges can be and are made for the inch as for the +metric system, and the inch is decimally divided, but we require another +decimal point to express our measurement.</p> + +<p>Metric gauges can now be procured from the material shops; they consist +of tenth measures, verniers and micrometers; the finer ones of these +come from Glashutte, and are the ones mentioned by Grossmann in his +essay on the lever escapement. Any workman who has once used these +instruments could not be persuaded to do without them.</p> + +<p>No one can comprehend the geometrical principles employed in escapements +without a knowledge of angles and their measurements, therefore we deem +it of sufficient importance to at least explain what a degree is, as we +know for a fact, that young workmen especially, often fail to see how to +apply it.</p> + +<p>Every circle, no matter how large or small it may be, contains <abbr title="360 degrees">360°</abbr>; a +degree is therefore the 360th part of a circle; it is divided into +minutes, seconds, thirds, etc.</p> + +<p>To measure the <em>value</em> of a degree of any circle, we must multiply the +diameter of it by 3.1416, which gives us the circumference, and then +divide it by 360. It will be seen that it depends on the size of that +circle or its radius, as to the value of a degree in any <em>actual</em> +measurement. To illustrate; a degree on the earth’s circumference +measures 60 geographical miles, while measured on the circumference of +an escape wheel 7.5 mm. in diameter, or as they would designate it in a +material shop, <abbr title="Number 7 and a half">No. 7½</abbr>, it would be 7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 = .0655 mm., which +is equal to the breadth of an ordinary human hair; it is a degree in +both cases, but the difference is very great, therefore a degree cannot +be associated<span class="num" title="Page 5"> </span><a name="p5" id="p5"></a> with any actual measurement until the radius of the +circle is known. Degrees are generated from the center of the circle, +and should be thought of as to ascension or direction and relative +value. Circles contain four right angles of <abbr title="90 degrees">90°</abbr> each. Degrees are +commonly measured by means of the protractor, although the ordinary +instruments of this kind leave very much to be desired. The lines can be +verified by means of the compass, which is a good practical method.</p> + +<p>It may also be well to give an explanation of some of the terms used.</p> + +<p><dfn>Drop</dfn> equals the amount of freedom which is allowed for the action of +pallets and wheel. See <var class="cap">Z</var>, <a href="#fig01">Fig. 1</a>.</p> + +<p><dfn>Primitive or Geometrical Diameter.</dfn>—In the ratchet tooth or English +wheel, the primitive and real diameter are equal; in the club tooth +wheel it means across the locking corners of the teeth; in such a wheel, +therefore, the primitive is <em>less</em> than the real diameter by the height +of two impulse planes.</p> + +<p><dfn>Lock</dfn> equals the depth of locking, measured from the locking corner of +the pallet at the moment the drop has occurred.</p> + +<p><dfn>Run</dfn> equals the amount of angular motion of pallets and fork to the +bankings <em>after</em> the drop has taken place.</p> + +<p><dfn>Total Lock</dfn> equals lock plus run.</p> + +<p>A <dfn>Tangent</dfn> is a line which <em>touches</em> a curve, but does not intersect +it. <var class="cap">AC</var> and <var class="cap">AD</var>, Figs. <a href="#fig02">2</a> and <a href="#fig03">3</a>, are tangents to the primitive circle <var class="cap">GH</var> at +the points of intersection of <var class="cap">EB</var>, <var class="cap">AC</var>, and <var class="cap">GH</var> and <var class="cap">FB</var>, <var class="cap">AD</var> and <var class="cap">GH</var>.</p> + +<p><dfn>Impulse Angle</dfn> equals the angular connection of the impulse or ruby pin +with the lever fork; or in other words, of the balance with the +escapement.</p> + +<p><dfn>Impulse Radius.</dfn>—From the face of the impulse jewel to the center of +motion, which is in the balance staff, most writers assume the impulse +angle and radius to be equal, and it is true that they must conform with +one another. We have made a radical change in the radius and one which +does not affect the angle. We shall prove this in due time,<span class="num" title="Page 6"> </span><a name="p6" id="p6"></a> and also +that the wider the impulse pin the greater must the impulse radius be, +although the angle will remain unchanged.</p> + +<p>Right here we wish to put in a word of advice to all young men, and that +is to learn to draw. No one can be a thorough watchmaker unless he can +draw, because he cannot comprehend his trade unless he can do so.</p> + +<p>We know what it has done for us, and we have noticed the same results +with others, therefore we speak from personal experience. Attend night +schools and mechanic’s institutes and improve yourselves.</p> + +<p>The young workmen of Toronto have a great advantage in the Toronto +Technical School, but we are sorry to see that out of some 600 students, +only five watchmakers attended last year. We can account for the +majority of them, so it would seem as if the young men of the trade were +not much interested, or thought they could not apply the knowledge to be +gained there. This is a great mistake; we might almost say that +knowledge of any kind can be applied to horology. The young men who take +up these studies, will see the great advantage of them later on; one +workman will labor intelligently and the other do blind “guess” work.</p> + +<p>We are now about to enter upon our subject and deem it well to say, we +have endeavored to make it as plain as possible. It is a deep subject +and is difficult to treat lightly; we will treat it in our own way, +paying special attention to all these points which bothered us during +the many years of painstaking study which we gave to the subject. We +especially endeavor to point out how theory can be applied to practice; +while we cannot expect that everyone will understand the subject without +study, we think we have made it comparatively easy of comprehension.</p> + +<p>We will give our method of drafting the escapement, which happens in +some respects to differ from others. We believe in making a drawing +which we can reproduce in a watch.</p> + + +<div class="transnote"> +<h2><a name="contents" id="contents"></a>CONTENTS.</h2> + +<ul> +<li><a href="#draw">The Draw</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#lock">The Lock</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#run">The Run</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#lift">The Lift</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#distance">The Center Distance of Wheel and Pallets</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#equi">Equidistant vs. Circular</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#fork">The Fork and Roller Action</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#safety">The Safety Action</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#crescent">The Crescent</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#horn">The Horn</a>.</li> +<li><a href="#spec">Specifications for Lever Escapement</a>.</li> +</ul> +</div> + +<hr /> +<h1 style="font-size:140%;"><span class="num" title="Page 7"> </span><a name="p7" id="p7"></a><a name="AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_LEVER_ESCAPEMENT" id="AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_LEVER_ESCAPEMENT"></a>AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT.</h1> + + +<p>The lever escapement is derived from Graham’s dead-beat escapement for +clocks. Thomas Mudge was the first horologist who successfully applied +it to watches in the detached form, about 1750. The locking faces of the +pallets were arcs of circles struck from the pallet centers. Many +improvements were made upon it until to-day it is the best form of +escapement for a general purpose watch, and when made on mechanical +principles is capable of producing first rate results.</p> + +<p>Our object will be to explain the whys and wherefores of this +escapement, and we will at once begin with the number of teeth in the +escape wheel. It is not obligatory in the lever, as in the verge, to +have an uneven number of teeth in the wheel. While nearly all have 15 +teeth, we might make them of 14 or 16; occasionally we find some in +complicated watches of 12 teeth, and in old English watches, of 30, +which is a clumsy arrangement, and if the pallets embrace only three +teeth in the latter, the pallet center cannot be pitched on a tangent.</p> + +<p>Although advisable from a timing standpoint that the teeth in the escape +wheel should divide evenly into the number of beats made per minute in a +watch with seconds hand, it is not, strictly speaking, necessary that it +should do so, as an example will show. We will take an ordinary watch, +beating 300 times per minute; we will fit an escape wheel of 16 teeth; +multiply this by 2, as there is a forward and then a return motion of +the balance and consequently two beats for each tooth, making +16 × 2 = 32 beats for each revolution of the escape wheel. 300 beats are +made per minute; divide this by the beats made on each revolution, and +we have the number of times in which the escape wheel revolves per +minute, namely, 300 ÷ 32 = 9.375. This number then is the proportion +existing for the teeth and pitch<span class="num" title="Page 8"> </span><a name="p8" id="p8"></a> diameters of the 4th wheel and escape +pinion. We must now find a suitable number of teeth for this wheel and +pinion. Of available pinions for a watch, the only one which would +answer would be one of 8 leaves, as any other number would give a +fractional number of teeth for the 4th wheel, therefore 9.375 × 8 = 75 +teeth in 4th wheel. Now as to the proof: as is well known, if we +multiply the number of teeth contained in 4th and escape wheels also by +2, for the reason previously given, and divide by the leaves in the +escape pinion, we get the number of beats made per minute; therefore +<sup>(75 × 16 × 2)</sup><abbr title="over">⁄</abbr><sub>8</sub> = 300 beats per minute.</p> + +<p>Pallets can be made to embrace more than three teeth, but would be much +heavier and therefore the mechanical action would suffer. They can also +be made to embrace fewer teeth, but the necessary side shake in the +pivot holes would prove very detrimental to a total lifting angle of +<abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr>, which represents the angle of movement in modern watches. Some of +the finest ones only make 8 or <abbr title="9 degrees">9°</abbr> of a movement; the smaller the angle +the greater will the effects of defective workmanship be; <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr> is a +common-sense angle and gives a safe escapement capable of fine results. +Theoretically, if a timepiece could be produced in which the balance +would vibrate without being connected with an escapement, we would have +reached a step nearer the goal. Practice has shown this to be the proper +theory to work on. Hence, the smaller the pallet and impulse angles the +less will the balance and escapement be connected. The chronometer is +still more highly detached than the lever.</p> + +<p>The pallet embracing three teeth is sound and practical, and when +applied to a 15 tooth wheel, this arrangement offers certain geometrical +and mechanical advantages in its construction, which we will notice in +due time. 15 teeth divide evenly into <abbr title="360 degrees">360°</abbr> leaving an interval of <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr> +from tooth to tooth, which is also the angle at which the locking faces +of the teeth are inclined from the center, which fact will be found +convenient when we come to cut our wheel.</p> + +<p><span class="num" title="Page 9"> </span><a name="p9" id="p9"></a>From locking to locking on the pallet scaping over three teeth, the +angle is <abbr title="60 degrees">60°</abbr>, which is equal to <abbr title="2 and a half">2½</abbr> spaces of the wheel. <a href="#fig01">Fig. 1</a> +illustrates the lockings, spanning this arc. If the pallets embraced 4 +teeth, the angle would be <abbr title="84 degrees">84°</abbr>; or in case of a 16 tooth wheel scaping +over three teeth, the angle would be 360 × <sup>2.5</sup><abbr title="over">⁄</abbr><sub>16</sub> = <abbr title="56 and a quarter degrees">56¼°</abbr>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="fig01" id="fig01"></a><img src="images/fig01.png" width="400" height="333" alt="Part of a toothed wheel. The teeth are 24 degrees apart, and two pallets cover 60 degrees, enclosing 3 teeth." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 1.</p> +</div> + +<p>Pallets may be divided into two kinds, namely: equidistant and circular. +The equidistant pallet is so-called because the lockings are an equal +distance from the center; sometimes it is also called the tangential +escapement, on account of the unlocking taking place on the intersection +of tangent <var class="cap">AC</var> with <var class="cap">EB</var>, and <var class="cap">FB</var> with <var class="cap">AD</var>, the tangents, which is the +valuable feature of this form of escapement.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="fig02" id="fig02"></a><img src="images/fig02.png" width="400" height="306" alt="Diagram of an equidistant pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 2.</p> +</div> + +<p><var class="cap">AC</var> and <var class="cap">AD</var>, <a href="#fig02">Fig. 2</a>, are tangents to the primitive circle <var class="cap">GH</var>. <var class="cap">ABE</var> and <var class="cap">ABF</var> +are angles of <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> each, together<span class="num" title="Page 10"> </span><a name="p10" id="p10"></a> therefore forming the angle <var class="cap">FBE</var> of +<abbr title="60 degrees">60°</abbr>. The locking circle <var class="cap">MN</var> is struck from the pallet center <var class="cap">A</var>; the +interangles being equal, consequently the pallets must be equidistant.</p> + +<p>The weak point of this pallet is that the lifting is not performed so +favorably; by examining the lifting planes <var class="cap">MO</var> and <var class="cap">NP</var>, we see that the +discharging edge, <var class="cap">O</var>, is closer to the center, <var class="cap">A</var>, than the discharging +edge, <var class="cap">P</var>; consequently the lifting on the engaging pallet is performed on +a shorter lever arm than on the disengaging pallet, also any inequality +in workmanship would prove more detrimental on the engaging than on the +disengaging pallet. The equidistant pallet requires fine workmanship +throughout. We have purposely shown it of a width of <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr>, which is the +widest we can employ in a 15 tooth wheel, and shows the defects of this +escapement more readily than if we had used a narrow pallet. A narrower +pallet is advisable, as the difference in the discharging edges will be +less, and the lifting arms would, therefore, not show so much difference +in leverage.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="fig03" id="fig03"></a><img src="images/fig03.png" width="400" height="300" alt="Diagram of a circular pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 3.</p> +</div> + +<p>The circular pallet is sometimes appropriately called “the pallet with +equal lifts,” as the lever arms <var class="cap">AMO</var> and <var class="cap">ANP</var>, <a href="#fig03">Fig. 3</a>, are equal lengths. +It will be noticed by examining the diagram, that the pallets are +bisected by the <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> lines <var class="cap">EB</var> and <var class="cap">FB</var>, one-half their width being placed +on each side of these lines. In this pallet we have two locking circles, +<var class="cap">MP</var><span class="num" title="Page 11"> </span><a name="p11" id="p11"></a> for the engaging pallet, and <var class="cap">NO</var> for the disengaging pallet. The weak +points in this escapement are that the unlocking resistance is greater +on the engaging than on the disengaging pallet, and that neither of them +lock on the tangents <var class="cap">AC</var> and <var class="cap">AD</var>, at the points of intersection with <var class="cap">EB</var> +and <var class="cap">FB</var>. The narrower the circular pallet is made, the nearer to the +tangent will the unlocking be performed. In neither the equidistant or +circular pallets can the unlocking resistance be <em>exactly</em> the same on +each pallet, as in the engaging pallet the friction takes place before +<var class="cap">AB</var>, the line of centers, which is more severe than when this line has +been passed, as is the case with the disengaging pallet; this fact +proportionately increases the existing defects of the circular over the +equidistant pallet, and <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">vice versa</i>, but for the same reason, the +lifting in the equidistant is proportionately <ins class="corr" title="Transcriber’s note: Original reads ‘acompanied’.">accompanied</ins> by more +friction than in the circular.</p> + +<p>Both equidistant and circular pallets have their adherents; the finest +Swiss, French and German watches are made with equidistant escapements, +while the majority of English and American watches contain the circular. +In our opinion the English are wise in adhering to the circular form. We +think a ratchet wheel should not be employed with equidistant pallets. +By examining <a href="#fig02">Fig. 2</a>, we see an English pallet of this form. We have +shown its defects in such a wide pallet as the English (as we have +before stated), because they are more readily perceived; also, on +account of the shape of the teeth, there is danger of the discharging +edge, <var class="cap">P</var>, dipping so deep into the wheel, as to make considerable drop +necessary, or the pallets would touch on the backs of the teeth. In the +case of the club tooth, the latter is hollowed out, therefore, less drop +is required. We have noticed that theoretically, it is advantageous to +make the pallets narrower than the English, both for the equidistant and +circular escapements. There is an escapement, <a href="#fig04">Fig. 4</a>, which is just the +opposite to the English. The entire lift is performed by the wheel, +while in the case of the ratchet wheel,<span class="num" title="Page 12"> </span><a name="p12" id="p12"></a> the entire lifting angle is on +the pallets; also, the pallets being as narrow as they can be made, +consistent with strength, it has the good points of both the equidistant +and circular pallets, as the unlocking can be performed on the tangent +and the lifting arms are of equal length. The wheel, however, is so much +heavier as to considerably increase the inertia; also, we have a metal +surface of quite an extent sliding over a thin jewel. For practical +reasons, therefore, it has been slightly altered in form and is only +used in cheap work, being easily made.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="fig04" id="fig04"></a><img src="images/fig04.png" width="400" height="356" alt="An escapement opposite to the English." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 4.</p> +</div> + +<p>We will now consider the drop, which is a clear loss of power, and, if +excessive, is the cause of much irregularity. It should be as small as +possible consistent with perfect freedom of action.</p> + +<p>In so far as <em>angular</em> measurements are concerned, no hard and fast rule +can be applied to it, the larger the escape wheel the smaller should be +the angle allowed for drop. Authorities on the subject allow <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> drop +for the club and <abbr title="2 degrees">2°</abbr> for the ratchet tooth. It is a fact that escape +wheels are not cut perfectly true; the teeth are apt to bend slightly +from the action of the cutters. The truest wheel can be made of steel, +as each tooth can be successively ground after being hardened and +tempered. Such a wheel would require less drop than one of any other +metal. Supposing we have a<span class="num" title="Page 13"> </span><a name="p13" id="p13"></a> wheel with a primitive diameter of 7.5 mm., +what is the amount of drop, allowing <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> by angular measurement? +7.5 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .0983 mm., which is sufficient; a hair could +get between the pallet and tooth, and would not stop the watch. Even +after allowing for imperfectly divided teeth, we require no greater +freedom even if the wheel is larger. Now suppose we take a wheel with a +primitive diameter of 8.5 mm. and find the amount of drop; +<ins class="corr" title="Transcriber’s note: This calculation is wrong. Perhaps this figure should read 10.8?">8.5</ins> × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.5 = .1413 mm., or .1413 − .0983 = .043 mm., +more drop than the smaller wheel, if we take the same angle. This is a +waste of force. The angular drop should, therefore, be proportioned +according to the size of the wheel. We wish it to be understood that +common sense must always be our guide. When the horological student once +arrives at this standpoint, he can <em>intelligently</em> apply himself to his +calling.</p> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="draw" id="draw"></a>The Draw.</h2> +<p>—The draw or draft angle was added to the pallets in order +to draw the fork back against the bankings and the guard point from the +roller whenever the safety action had performed its function.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<a name="fig05" id="fig05"></a><img src="images/fig05.png" width="400" height="303" alt="Diagram illustrating Draw." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 5.</p> +</div> + +<p>Pallets with draw are more difficult to unlock than those without it, +this is in the nature of a fault, but whenever there are two faults we +must choose the less. The rate of the watch will suffer less on account +of the recoil introduced than it would were the locking faces arcs of +circles struck from the pallet center, in which case the guard point +would often remain against the roller. The draw should be as light as +possible consistent with safety of action; some writers allow <abbr title="15 degrees">15°</abbr> on the +engaging and <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> on the disengaging pallet; others again allow <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> on +each, which we deem sufficient. The draw is measured from the locking +edges <var class="cap">M</var> and <var class="cap">N</var>, <a href="#fig05">Fig. 5</a>. The locking planes <em>when locked</em> are inclined <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> +from <var class="cap">EB</var>, and <var class="cap">FB</var>. In the case of the engaging pallet it inclines toward +the center <var class="cap">A</var>. The draw is produced on account of <var class="cap">MA</var> being longer than +<var class="cap">RA</var>, consequently, when power is applied to the scape tooth <var class="cap">S</var>, the pallet +is<span class="num" title="Page 14"> </span><a name="p14" id="p14"></a> drawn into the wheel. The disengaging pallet inclines in the same +direction but away from the center <var class="cap">A</var>; the reason is obvious from the +former explanation. Some people imagine that the greater the incline on +the locking edge of the escape teeth, the stronger the draw would be. +This is not the case, but it is certainly necessary that the point of +the tooth alone should touch the pallet. From this it follows that the +angle on the teeth must be greater than on the pallets; examine the +disengaging pallet in <a href="#fig05">Fig. 5</a>, as it is from this pallet that the +inclination of the teeth must be determined, as in the case of the +engaging pallet the motion is toward the line of centers <var class="cap">AB</var>, and +therefore <em>away</em> from the tooth, which partially explains why some +people advocate <abbr title="15 degrees">15°</abbr> draw for this pallet. As illustrated in the case of +the disengaging pallet, however, the motion is also towards the line of +centers <var class="cap">AB</var>, and <em>towards</em> the tooth as well, all of which will be seen +by the dotted circles <var class="cap">MM2</var> and <var class="cap">NN2</var>, representing the paths of the +pallets. It will be noticed that <var class="cap">UNF</var> and <var class="cap">BNB</var> are opposite and equal +angles of <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr>. For practical reasons, from a manufacturing standpoint, +the angle on the tooth is made just twice the amount, namely <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr>; we +could make it a little less or a little more. If we made it less than +<abbr title="20 degrees">20°</abbr> too great a surface would be in contact with the jewel, involving +greater friction in unlocking and an inefficient draw, but in the case +of an English lever<span class="num" title="Page 15"> </span><a name="p15" id="p15"></a> with such an arrangement we could do with less +drop, which advantage would be too dearly bought; or if the angle is +made over <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr>, the point or locking edge of the tooth would rapidly +become worn in case of a brass wheel. Also in an English lever more drop +would be required.</p> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="lock" id="lock"></a>The Lock.</h2> +<p>—What we have said in regard to drop also applies to the +lock, which should be as small as possible, consistent with perfect +safety. The greater the drop the deeper must be the lock; <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> is the +angle generally allowed for the lock, but it is obvious that in a large +escapement it can be less.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<a name="fig06" id="fig06"></a><img src="images/fig06.png" width="450" height="196" alt="Diagram illustrating the Run." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 6.</p> +</div> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="run" id="run"></a>The Run.</h2> +<p>—The run or, as it is sometimes called, “the slide,” should +also be as light as possible; from <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> to <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr> is sufficient. It follows +then, the bankings should be as close together as possible, consistent +with requisite freedom for escaping. Anything more than this increases +the angular connection of the balance with the escapement, which +directly violates the theory under which it is constructed; also, a +greater amount of work will be imposed upon the balance to meet the +increased unlocking resistance, resulting in a poor motion and accurate +time will be out of the question. It will be seen that those workmen who +make a practice of opening the banks, “to give the escapement more +freedom” simply jump from the frying pan into the fire. The bankings +should be as far removed from the pallet center as possible, as the +further away they are pitched the less run we require, according to +angular measurement. <a href="#fig06">Figure 6</a> illustrates<span class="num" title="Page 16"> </span><a name="p16" id="p16"></a> this fact; the tooth <var class="cap">S</var> has +just dropped on the engaging pallet, but the fork has not yet reached +the bankings. At <var>a</var> we have <abbr title="1 degrees">1°</abbr> of run, while if placed at <var>b</var> we would +only have <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr> of run, but still the same freedom for escaping, and less +unlocking resistance.</p> + +<p>The bankings should be placed towards the acting end of the fork as +illustrated, as in case the watch “rebanks” there would be more strain +on the lever pivots if they were placed at the other end of the fork.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<a name="fig07" id="fig07"></a><img src="images/fig07.png" width="450" height="108" alt="Diagram showing two right-angled triangles with a weight labelled 2 at the bottom of each slope. The first triangle slopes more." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 7.</p> +</div> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="lift" id="lift"></a>The Lift.</h2> +<p>—The lift is composed of the actual lift on the teeth and +pallets and the lock and run. We will suppose that from drop to drop we +allow <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr>; if the lock is <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> then the actual lift by means of the +inclined planes on teeth and pallets will be <abbr title="8 and a half degrees">8½°</abbr>. We have seen that a +small lifting angle is advisable, so that the vibrations of the balance +will be as free as possible. There are other reasons as well. <a href="#fig07">Fig. 7</a> +shows two inclined planes; we desire to lift the weight 2 a distance +equal to the angle at which the planes are inclined; it will be seen at +a glance that we will have less friction by employing the smaller +incline, whereas with the larger one the motive power is employed +through a greater distance on the object to be moved. The smaller the +angle the more energetic will the movement be; the grinding of the +angles and fit of the pivots, etc., also increases in importance. An +actual lift of <abbr title="8 and a half degrees">8½°</abbr> satisfies the conditions imposed very well. We have +before seen that both on account of the unlocking and the lifting +leverage of the pallet arms, it would be advisable to make them narrow +both in the equidistant and circular escapement. We will now<span class="num" title="Page 17"> </span><a name="p17" id="p17"></a> study the +question from the standpoint of the lift, in so far as the wheel is +concerned.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<a name="fig08" id="fig08"></a><img src="images/fig08.png" width="450" height="309" alt="Diagram comparing wide and narrow pallets." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 8.</p> +</div> + +<p>It is self-evident that a narrow pallet requires a wide tooth, and a +wide pallet a narrow or thin tooth wheel; in the ratchet wheel we have a +metal point passing over a jeweled plane. The friction is at its +minimum, because there is less adhesion than with the club tooth, but we +must emphasize the fact that we require a greater angle in proportion on +the pallets in this escapement than with the narrow pallets and wider +tooth. This seems to be a point which many do not thoroughly comprehend, +and we would advise a close study of <a href="#fig08">Fig. 8</a>, which will make it +perfectly clear, as we show both a wide and a narrow pallet. <var class="cap">GH</var>, +represents the primitive, which in this figure is also the real diameter +of the escape wheel. In measuring the lifting angles for the pallets, +our starting point is <em>always</em> from the tangents <var class="cap">AC</var> and <var class="cap">AD</var>. The tangents +are straight lines, but the wheel describes the circle <var class="cap">GH</var>, therefore +they must deviate from one another, and the closer to the center <var class="cap">A</var> the +discharging edge of the engaging pallet reaches, the greater does this +difference become; and in the same manner the further the discharging +edge of the disengaging pallet is from the center <var class="cap">A</var> the greater it is. +This shows that the loss is greater in the equidistant than in the +circular escapement. After this<span class="num" title="Page 18"> </span><a name="p18" id="p18"></a> we will designate this difference as +the “loss.” In order to illustrate it more plainly we show the widest +pallet—the English—in equidistant form. This gives another reason why +the English lever should only be made with circular pallets, as we have +seen that the wider the pallet the greater the loss. The loss is +measured at the intersection of the path of the discharging edge <var class="cap">OO</var>, +with the circle <var class="cap">G H</var>, and is shown through <var class="cap">AC2</var>, which intersects these +circles at that point. In the case of the disengaging pallet, <var class="cap">PP</var> +illustrates the path of the discharging edge; the loss is measured as in +the preceding case where <var class="cap">GH</var> is intersected as shown by <var class="cap">AD2</var>. It amounts +to a different value on each pallet. Notice the loss between <var class="cap">C</var> and <var class="cap">C2</var>, +on the engaging, and <var class="cap">D</var> and <var class="cap">D2</var> on the disengaging pallet; it is greater +on the engaging pallet, so much so that it amounts to <abbr title="2 degrees">2°</abbr>, which is equal +to the entire lock; therefore if <abbr title="8 and a half degrees">8½°</abbr> of work is to be accomplished +through this pallet, the lifting plane requires an angle of <abbr title="10 and a half degrees">10½°</abbr> struck +from <var class="cap">AC</var>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<a name="fig09" id="fig09"></a><img src="images/fig09.png" width="450" height="228" alt="A sequence of 4 diagrams, showing the engaging pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 9.</p> +</div> + +<p>Let us now consider the lifting action of the club tooth wheel. This is +decidedly a complicated action, and requires some study to comprehend. +In action with the engaging pallet the wheel moves <em>up</em>, or in the +direction of the motion of the pallets, but on the disengaging pallet it +moves <em>down</em>, and in a direction opposite to the pallets, and the heel +of the tooth moves with greater velocity than the locking edge; also in +the case of the engaging pallet, the locking edge moves with greater +velocity than the discharging edge; in the disengaging pallet the +opposite is the case, as the discharging edge moves with greater +velocity than the locking. These points involve factors which must be +considered, and the drafting of a correct action is of paramount +importance; we therefore show the lift as it is accomplished in four +different stages in a good action. <a href="#fig09">Fig. 9</a> illustrates the engaging, and +<a href="#fig10">Fig. 10</a> the disengaging pallet; by comparing the figures it will be +noticed that the lift takes place on the point of the tooth similar to +the English, until the discharging<span class="num" title="Page 19"> </span><a name="p19" id="p19"></a> edge of the pallet has been passed, +when the heel gradually comes into play on the engaging, but more +quickly on the disengaging pallet.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"> +<a name="fig10" id="fig10"></a><img src="images/fig10.png" width="500" height="135" alt="A sequence of 4 diagrams showing the disengaging pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 10.</p> +</div> + +<p>We will also notice that during the first part of the lift the tooth +moves faster along the engaging lifting plane than on the disengaging; +on pallets 2 and 3 this difference is quite large; towards the latter +part of the lift the action becomes quicker on the disengaging pallet +and slower on the engaging.</p> + +<p>To obviate this difficulty some fine watches, notably those of A. Lange +& Sons, have convex lifting planes on the engaging and concave on the +disengaging pallets; the lifting planes on the teeth are also curved. +See <a href="#fig11">Fig. 11</a>. This is decidedly an ingenious arrangement, and is in +strict accordance with scientific investigation. We should see many fine +watches made with such escapements if the means for producing them could +fully satisfy the requirements of the scientific principles involved.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 300px;"> +<a name="fig11" id="fig11"></a><img src="images/fig11.png" width="300" height="216" alt="Diagram showing the convex plane on the engaging and concave on the disengaging pallets." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 11.</p> +</div> + +<p>The distribution of the lift on tooth and pallet is a very important +matter; the lifting angle on the tooth must be <em>less</em> in proportion to +its width than it is on the pallet. For the sake of making it perfectly +plain, we illustrate what should not be made; if we have <abbr title="10 and a half degrees">10½°</abbr> for width +of tooth and pallet, and take half of it for a tooth, and the other<span class="num" title="Page 20"> </span><a name="p20" id="p20"></a> +half for the pallet, making each of them <abbr title="5 and a quarter degrees">5¼°</abbr> in width, and suppose we +have a lifting of <abbr title="8 and a half degrees">8½°</abbr> to distribute between them, by allowing <abbr title="4 and a quarter degrees">4¼°</abbr> on +each, the lift would take place as shown in <a href="#fig12">Fig. 12</a>, which is a very +unfavorable action. The edge of the engaging pallet scrapes on the +lifting plane of the tooth, yet it is astonishing to find some otherwise +very fine watches being manufactured right along which contain this +fault; such watches can be stopped with the ruby pin in the fork and the +engaging pallet in action, nor would they start when run down as soon as +the crown is touched, no matter how well they were finished and fitted.</p> + +<p>The lever lengths of the club tooth are variable, while with the ratchet +they are constant, which is in its favor; in the latter it would always +be as <var class="cap">SB</var>, <a href="#fig13">Fig. 13</a>. This is a shorter lever than <var class="cap">QB</var>, consequently more +powerful, although the greater velocity is at <var class="cap">Q</var>, which only comes into +action after the inertia of wheel and pallets has been overcome, and +when the greatest momentum during contact is reached. <var class="cap">SB</var> is the +primitive radius of the club tooth wheel, but both primitive and <em>real</em> +radius of the ratchet wheel. The distance of centers of wheel and pallet +will be alike in both cases; also the lockings will be the same distance +apart on both pallets; therefore, when horologists, even if they have +worldwide reputations, claim that the club tooth has an advantage over +the ratchet because<span class="num" title="Page 21"> </span><a name="p21" id="p21"></a> it begins the lift with a shorter lever than the +latter, it does not make it so. We are treating the subject from a +purely horological standpoint, and neither patriotism or prejudice has +anything to do with it. We wish to sift the matter thoroughly and arrive +at a just conception of the merits and defects of each form of +escapement, and show <em>reasons</em> for our conclusions.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 100px;"> +<a name="fig12" id="fig12"></a><img src="images/fig12.png" width="100" height="294" alt="Illustrating a faulty lift." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 12.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 165px;"> +<a name="fig13" id="fig13"></a><img src="images/fig13.png" width="165" height="294" alt="Lever lengths." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 13.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p style="clear:both;">Anyone who has closely followed our deductions must see that in so far +as the wheel is concerned the ratchet or English wheel has several +points in its favor. Such a wheel is inseparable from a wide pallet; but +we have seen that a narrower pallet is advisable; also as little drop +and lock as possible; clearly, we must effect a compromise.<span class="num" title="Page 22"> </span><a name="p22" id="p22"></a> In other +words, so far the balance of our reasoning is in favor of the club tooth +escapement and to effect an intelligent division of angles for tooth, +pallet and lift is one of the great questions which confronts the +intelligent horologist.</p> + +<p>Anyone who has ever taken the pains to draw pallet and tooth with +different angles, through every stage of the lift, with both wide and +narrow pallets and teeth, in circular and equidistant escapements, will +have received an eye-opener. We strongly advise all our readers who are +practical workmen to try it after studying what we have said. We are +certain it will repay them.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/fig02.png" width="400" height="306" alt="Repitition of the diagram of the equidistant pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 2.</p> +</div> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="distance" id="distance"></a>The Center Distance of Wheel and Pallets. </h2> +<p>The direction of pressure of +the wheel teeth should be through the pallet center by drawing the +tangents <var class="cap">AC</var> and <var class="cap">AD</var>, <a href="#fig02">Fig. 2</a> to the primitive circle <var class="cap">GH</var>, at the +intersection of the angle <var class="cap">FBE</var>. This condition is realized in the +equidistant pallet. In the circular pallet, <a href="#fig03">Fig. 3</a>, this condition +cannot exist, as in order <em>to lock</em> on a tangent the center distance +should be <em>greater</em> for the engaging and <em>less</em> for the disengaging +pallet, therefore watchmakers aim to go between the two and plant them +as before specified at <var class="cap">A</var>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/fig03.png" width="400" height="300" alt="Repetition of the diagram of a circular pallet." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 3.</p> +</div> + +<p>When planted on the tangents the unlocking resistance will be less and +the impulse transmitted under favorable<span class="num" title="Page 23"> </span><a name="p23" id="p23"></a> conditions, especially so in +the circular, as the direction of pressure coincides (close to the +center of the lift), with the law of the parallelogram of forces.</p> + +<p>It is <em>impossible</em> to plant pallets on the tangents in very small +escapements, as there would not be enough room for a pallet arbor of +proper strength, nor will they be found planted on the tangents in the +medium size escapement with a long pallet arbor, nor in such a one with +a very wide tooth (see <a href="#fig04">Fig. 4</a>) as the heel would come so close to the +center <var class="cap">A</var>, that the solidity of pallets and arbor would suffer. We will +give an actual example. For a medium sized escape wheel with a primitive +diameter of 7.5 mm., the center distance <var class="cap">AB</var> is 4.33 mm. By using <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr> of a +lifting angle on the teeth, the distance from the heel of the tooth to +the pallet center will be .4691 mm.; by allowing .1 mm. between wheel +and pallet and .15 mm. for stock on the pallets we find we will have a +pallet arbor as follows: <ins class="corr" title="Transcriber’s note: Sic. Presumably left-to-right calculation is used, rather than normal precedence rules.">.4691 − (.1 + .15) × 2 = .4382 mm.</ins> +It would not be practicable to make anything smaller.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/fig04.png" width="400" height="356" alt="Repetition of earlier diagram." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 4.</p> +</div> + +<p>It behooves us now to see that while a narrow pallet is advisable a very +wide tooth is not; yet these two are inseparable. Here is another case +for a compromise, as, unquestionably the pallets ought to be planted on +the tangents. There is no difficulty about it in the English lever,<span class="num" title="Page 24"> </span><a name="p24" id="p24"></a> and +we have shown in our example that a judiciously planned club tooth +escapement of medium size can be made with the center distance properly +planted.</p> + +<p>When considering the center distance we must of necessity consider the +widths of teeth and pallets and their lifting angles. We are now at a +point in which no watchmaker of intelligence would indicate one certain +division for these parts and claim it to be “the best.” It is always +those who do not thoroughly understand a subject who are the first to +make such claims. We will, however, give our opinion within certain +limits. The angle to be divided for tooth and pallet is <abbr title="10 and a half degrees">10½°</abbr>. Let us +divide it by 2, which would be the most natural thing to do, and examine +the problem. We will have <abbr title="5 and a quarter degrees">5¼°</abbr> each for width of tooth and pallet. We +<em>must</em> have a smaller lifting angle on the tooth than on the pallet, but +the wider the tooth the greater should its lifting angle be. It would +not be mechanical to make the tooth wide and the lifting angle small, as +the lifting plane on the pallets would be too steep on account of being +narrow. <var class="cap">A</var> lifting angle on the tooth which would be <em>exactly</em> suitable +for a given circular, would be <em>too great</em> for a given equidistant +pallet. It follows, therefore, taking <abbr title="5 and a quarter degrees">5¼°</abbr> as a width for the tooth, that +while we could employ it in a fair sized escapement with equidistant<span class="num" title="Page 25"> </span><a name="p25" id="p25"></a> +pallets, we could not do so with circular pallets and still have the +latter pitched on the tangents. We see the majority of escapements made +with narrower teeth than pallets, and for a very good reason.</p> + +<p>In the example previously given, the <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr> lift on the tooth is well +adapted for a width of <abbr title="4 and a half degrees">4½°</abbr>, which would require a pallet <abbr title="6 degrees">6°</abbr> in width. +The tooth, therefore, would be <abbr title="three quarters">¾</abbr> the width of pallets, which is very +good indeed.</p> + +<p>From what we have said it follows that a large number of pallets are not +planted on the tangents at all. We have never noticed this question in +print before. Writers generally seem to, in fact do, assume that no +matter how large or small the escapement may be, or how the pallets and +teeth are divided for width and lifting angle, no difficulty will be +found in locating the pallets on the tangents. Theoretically there is no +difficulty, but in practice we find there is.</p> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="equi" id="equi"></a>Equidistant vs. Circular. </h2> +<p>At this stage we are able to weigh the +circular against the equidistant pallet. In beginning this essay we had +to explain the difference between them, so the reader could follow our +discussion, and not until now, are we able to sum up our conclusions.</p> + +<p>The reader will have noticed that for such an important action as the +lift, which supplies power to the balance, the circular pallet is +favored from every point of view. This is a very strong point in its +favor. On the other hand, the unlocking resistance being less, and as +nearly alike as possible on both pallets in the equidistant, it is a +question if the total vibration of the balance will be greater with the +one than the other, although it will receive the impulse under better +conditions from the circular pallet; but it expends more force in +unlocking it. Escapement friction plays an important role in the +position and isochronal adjustments; the greater the friction +encountered the slower the vibration of the balance. The friction should +be constant. In unlocking, the equidistant comes nearer to fulfilling<span class="num" title="Page 26"> </span><a name="p26" id="p26"></a> +this condition, while during the lift it is more nearly so in the +circular. The friction in unlocking, from a timing standpoint, +overshadows that of the impulse, and the tooth can be a little wider in +the equidistant than the circular escapement with the pallet properly +planted. Therefore for the <em>finest</em> watches the equidistant escapement +is well adapted, but for anything less than that the circular should be +our choice.</p> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="fork" id="fork"></a>The Fork and Roller Action. </h2> +<p>While the lifting action of the lever +escapement corresponds to that of the cylinder, the fork and roller +action corresponds to the impulse action in the chronometer and duplex +escapements.</p> + +<p>Our experience leads us to believe that the action now under +consideration is but imperfectly understood by many workmen. It is a +complicated action, and when out of order is the cause of many annoying +stoppages, often characterized by the watch starting when taken from the +pocket.</p> + +<p>The action is very important and is generally divided into impulse and +safety action, although we think we ought to divide it into three, +namely, by adding that of the unlocking action. We will first of all +consider the impulse and unlocking actions, because we cannot +intelligently consider the one without the other, as the ruby pin and +the slot in the fork are utilized in each. The ruby pin, or strictly +speaking, the “impulse radius,” is a lever arm, whose length is measured +from the center of the balance staff to the face of the ruby pin, and is +used, firstly, as a power or transmitting lever on the acting or +geometrical length of the fork (<i>i. e.</i>, from the pallet center to the +beginning of the horn), and which at the moment is a resistance lever, +to be utilized in unlocking the pallets. After the pallets are unlocked +the conditions are reversed, and we now find the lever fork, through the +pallets, transmitting power to the balance by means of the impulse +radius. In the first part of the action we have a short lever engaging a +longer one, which is an advantage. See <a href="#fig14">Fig. 14</a>, where we have<span class="num" title="Page 27"> </span><a name="p27" id="p27"></a> purposely +somewhat exaggerated the conditions. <var class="cap">A′X</var> represents the impulse radius +at present under discussion, and <var class="cap">AW</var> the acting length of the fork. It +will be seen that the shorter the impulse radius, or in other words, the +closer the ruby pin is to the balance staff and the longer the fork, the +easier <ins class="corr" title="Transcriber’s note: Original inserted the extra word ‘be’ between these words.">will the</ins> unlocking of the pallets be performed, but +this entails a great impulse angle, for the law applicable to the case +is, that the angles are in the inverse ratio to the radii. In other +words, the shorter the radius, the greater is the angle, and the smaller +the angle the greater is the radius. We know, though, that we must have +as small an impulse angle as possible in order that the balance should +be highly detached. Here is one point in favor of a short impulse +radius, and one against it. Now, let us turn to the impulse action. Here +we have the long lever <var class="cap">AW</var> acting on a short one, <var class="cap">A′X</var>, which is a +disadvantage. Here, then, we ought to try and have a short lever acting +on a long one, which would point to a short fork and a great impulse +radius. Suppose <var class="cap">AP</var>, <a href="#fig14">Fig. 14</a>,<span class="num" title="Page 28"> </span><a name="p28" id="p28"></a> is the length of fork, and <var class="cap">A′P</var> is the +impulse radius; here, then, we favor the impulse, and it is directly in +accordance with the theory of the free vibration of the balance, for, as +before stated, the longer the radius the smaller the angle. The action +at <var class="cap">P</var> is also closer to the line of centers than it is at <var class="cap">W</var>, which is +another advantage.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width:500px;"> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 173px;"> +<a name="fig14" id="fig14"></a><img src="images/fig14.png" width="173" height="550" alt="Fork and roller action." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 14.</p> +</div> +<div class="figright" style="width: 214px;"> +<a name="fig15" id="fig15"></a><img src="images/fig15.png" width="214" height="550" alt="Fork and roller action." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 15.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p style="clear:both;">We will notice that by employing a large impulse angle, and consequently +a short radius, the intersection <var>m</var> of the two circles <var>ii</var> and <var>cc</var> is +very <em>safe</em>, whereas, with the conditions reversed in favor of the +impulse action, the intersection at <var>k</var> is more delicate. We have now +seen enough to appreciate the fact that we favor one action at the +expense of another.</p> + +<p>By having a lifting angle on pallet and tooth of <abbr title="8 and a half degrees">8½°</abbr>, a locking angle of +<abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>, and a run of <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr>, we will have an angular movement of the fork of +<abbr title="8 and a half">8½</abbr> + <abbr title="1 and a half">1½</abbr> + <abbr title="one half">½</abbr> = <abbr title="10 and a half degrees">10½°</abbr>.</p> + +<p>Writers generally only consider the movement of the fork from drop to +drop on the pallets, but we will be thoroughly practical in the matter. +With a total motion of the fork of <abbr title="10 and a half degrees">10½°</abbr> (<var class="cap">JAW</var>, <a href="#fig15">Fig. 15</a>), one-half, or <abbr title="5 and a quarter degrees">5¼°</abbr> +will be performed on each side of the line of centers. We are at liberty +to choose any impulse angle which we may prefer; 3 to 1 is a good +proportion for an ordinary well-made watch. By employing it, the angle +<var class="cap">XA′Y</var> would be equal to <abbr title="31 and a half degrees">31½°</abbr>. The radius <var class="cap">A′X</var> <a href="#fig16">Fig. 16</a>, is also of the same +proportion, but the angle <var class="cap">AA′X</var> is greater because the fork angle <var class="cap">WAA′</var> is +greater than the same angle in <a href="#fig15">Fig. 15</a>. We will notice that the +intersection <var>k</var> is much smaller in <a href="#fig15">Fig. 15</a> than in <a href="#fig16">Fig. 16</a>. The action +in the latter begins much further from the line of centers than in the +former and outlines an action which should not be made.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 230px;"> +<a name="fig16" id="fig16"></a><img src="images/fig16.png" width="230" height="450" alt="An action which should not be made." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 16.</p> +</div> + +<p>To come back to the impulse angle, some might use a proportion of 3.5, 4 +or even 5 to 1, while others for the finest of watches would only use +2.75 to 1. By having a total vibration of the balance of <abbr title="1 and a half">1½</abbr> turns, which +is equal to <abbr title="540 degrees">540°</abbr> a fork angle of <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr> and a proportion of 2.75 for<span class="num" title="Page 29"> </span><a name="p29" id="p29"></a> the +impulse angle which would be equal to 10 × 2.75 = <abbr title="27 point 5 degrees">27.5°</abbr>. The <em>free</em> +vibration of the balance, or as this is called, “the supplemental arc,” +is equal to <abbr title="540 degrees">540°</abbr> − 27.<abbr title="5 degrees">5°</abbr> = 512.<abbr title="50 degrees">50°</abbr>, while with a proportion of 5 to 1, +making an impulse angle of <abbr title="50 degrees">50°</abbr>, it would be equal to <abbr title="490 degrees">490°</abbr>. To sum up, +the finer the watch the lower the proportion, the closer the action to +the line of centers, the smaller the friction. On account of leverage +the more difficult the unlocking but the more energetic the impulse when +it does occur. The velocity of the ruby pin at <var class="cap">P</var>; <a href="#fig14">Fig. 14</a>, is much +greater than at <var class="cap">W</var>, consequently it will not be overtaken as soon by the +fork as at <var class="cap">W</var>. The velocity of the fork at the latter point is greater +than at <var class="cap">P</var>; the intersection of <var>ii</var> and <var>cc</var> is also not as great; +therefore the lower the proportion the finer and more exact must the +workmanship be.</p> + +<p>We will notice that the unlocking action has been overruled by the +impulse. The only point so far in which the former has been favored is +in the diminished action before the line of centers, as previously +pointed out at <var class="cap">P</var>, <a href="#fig14">Fig. 14</a>.</p> + +<p>We will now consider the width of the ruby pin and to get a good insight +into the question, we will study <a href="#fig17">Fig. 17</a>. <var class="cap">A</var> is the pallet center, <var class="cap">A′</var> the +balance center, the line <var class="cap">AA′</var> being the line of centers; the angle <var class="cap">WAA</var> +equals half the total motion of the fork, the other half, of course, +taking place on the opposite side of the center line. <var class="cap">WA</var> is the <em>center</em> +of the fork when it rests against the bank. The angle <var class="cap">AA′X</var> represents +half the impulse angle; the other half, the same as with the fork, is +struck on the other side of the center line. At the point of +intersection of these angles we will draw <var>cc</var> from the pallet center <var class="cap">A</var>, +which equals the acting length of the fork, and from the balance center +we will draw <var>ii</var>, which equals the <em>theoretical</em> impulse radius; some +writers use it as the <em>real</em> radius. The wider the ruby pin the greater +will the latter be, which we will explain presently.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 250px;"> +<a name="fig17" id="fig17"></a><img src="images/fig17.png" width="250" height="475" alt="The ruby pin." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 17.</p> +</div> + +<p><span class="num" title="Page 30"> </span><a name="p30" id="p30"></a>The ruby pin in entering the fork must have a certain amount of freedom +for action, from 1 to <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>. Should the watch receive a jar at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent or passing hollow in the roller, the +fork would fly against the ruby pin. It is important that the angular +freedom between the fork and ruby pin at the moment it enters into the +slot be <em>less</em> than the total locking angle on the pallets. If we employ +a locking angle of <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> and <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr> run, we would have a total lock on the +pallets of <abbr title="2 degrees">2°</abbr>. By allowing <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> of freedom for the ruby pin at the moment +the guard point enters the crescent, in case the fork should strike the +face of the ruby pin, the pallets will still be locked <abbr title="three quarters of a degree">¾°</abbr> and the fork +drawn back against the bankings through the draft angle.</p> + +<p>We will see what this shake amounts to for a given acting length of +fork, which describes an arc of a circle, therefore the acting length is +only the radius of that circle and must be multiplied by two in order to +get the diameter. The acting length of fork = 4.5 mm., what is the +amount of shake when the ruby pin passes the acting corner? +4.5 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ <abbr title="360 degrees">360°</abbr> = .0785 × 1.25 = .0992 mm. The shake of the ruby +pin in the slot of the fork must be as slight as possible, consistent +with perfect freedom of action. It varies from <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> to <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr>, according to +length of fork and shape of ruby pin. <var class="cap">A</var> square ruby pin requires more +shake than any other kind; it enters the fork and receives the impulse +in a diagonal direction on the jewel, in which position it is +illustrated at <var class="cap">Z</var>, <a href="#fig20">Fig. 20</a>. This ruby pin acts on a knife edge, but for +all that the engaging friction during the unlocking action is +considerable.</p> + +<p>Our reasoning tells us it matters not if a ruby pin be wide or narrow, +it must have <em>the same</em> freedom in passing the acting edge of the fork, +therefore, to have the impulse radius on the point of intersection of +<var class="cap">A′X</var> with <var class="cap">AW</var>, <a href="#fig17">Fig. 17</a>, we would require a <em>very</em> narrow ruby pin. With <abbr title="1 degrees">1°</abbr> +of freedom at the edge, and <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr> in the slot, we could only<span class="num" title="Page 31"> </span><a name="p31" id="p31"></a> have a ruby +pin of a width of <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>. Applying it to the preceding example it would +only have an actual width of .0785 × 1.5 = .1178 mm., or the size of an +ordinary balance pivot. At <var>n</var>, <a href="#fig17">Fig. 17</a>, we illustrate such a ruby pin; +the theoretical and real impulse radius coincide with one another. The +intersection of the circle <var>ii</var> and <var>cc</var> is very slight, while the +friction in unlocking begins within <abbr title="1 degrees">1°</abbr> of half the total movement of the +fork from the line of centers; to illustrate, if the angular motion is +<abbr title="11 degrees">11°</abbr> the ruby pin under discussion will begin action <abbr title="4 and a half degrees">4½°</abbr> before the line +of centers, being an engaging, or “uphill” friction of considerable +magnitude.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width:550px;"> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 250px;"> +<a name="fig18" id="fig18"></a><img src="images/fig18.png" width="250" height="500" alt="The moment the impulse is transmitted." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 18.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 250px;"> +<a name="fig19" id="fig19"></a><img src="images/fig19.png" width="250" height="569" alt="The consequence of planting the ruby pin on the theoretical impulse radius." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 19.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p style="clear:both;">The intersection with the fork is also much less than with the wider +ruby pin, making the impulse action very delicate. On the other hand the +widest ruby pin for which there is any occasion is one beginning the +unlocking action on the line of centers, <a href="#fig17">Fig. 17</a>; this entails a width +of slot equal to the angular motion of the fork. We see here the +advantage of a wide ruby pin over a narrow one in the unlocking action. +Let us now examine the question from the standpoint of the impulse +action.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 150px;"> +<a name="fig20" id="fig20"></a><img src="images/fig20.png" width="150" height="140" alt="A square ruby pin." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 20.</p> +</div> + +<p><span class="num" title="Page 32"> </span><a name="p32" id="p32"></a><a href="#fig18">Fig. 18</a> illustrates the moment the impulse is transmitted; the fork has +been moved in the direction of the arrow by the ruby pin; the escapement +has been unlocked and the opposite side of the slot has just struck the +ruby pin. The exact position in which the impulse is transmitted varies +with the locking angle, the width of ruby pin, its shake in the slot, +the length of fork, its weight, and the velocity of the ruby pin, which +is determined by the vibrations of the balance and the impulse radius.</p> + +<p>In an escapement with a total lock of <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr> and <abbr title="1 and a quarter">1¼</abbr> of shake in the slot, +theoretically, the impulse would be transmitted <abbr title="2 degrees">2°</abbr> from the bankings. +The narrow ruby pin n receives the impulse on the line <var>v</var>, which is +closer to the line of centers than the line <var>u</var>, on which the large ruby +pin receives the impulse. Here then we have an advantage of the narrow +ruby pin over a wide one; with a wider ruby pin the balance is also more +liable to rebank when it takes a long vibration. Also on account of the +greater angle at which the ruby pin stands to the slot when the impulse +takes place, the <em>drop</em> of the fork against the jewel will amount to +more than its shake in the slot (which is measured when standing on the +line of centers). On this account some watches have slots dovetailed in +form, being wider at the bottom, others have ruby pins of this form. +They require very exact execution; we think we can do without them by +judiciously selecting a width of ruby pin between the two extremes. We +would choose a ruby pin of a width equal to half the angular motion of +the fork. There is an ingenious arrangement of fork and roller which +aims to, and partially does, overcome the difficulty of choosing between +a wide and narrow ruby pin, it is known as the Savage pin roller +escapement. We intend to describe it later.</p> + +<p>If the face of the ruby pin were planted on the theoretical impulse +radius <var>ii</var>, <a href="#fig19">Fig. 19</a>, the impulse would end in a butting action as +shown; hence the great importance of distinguishing<span class="num" title="Page 33"> </span><a name="p33" id="p33"></a> between the +theoretical and real impulse radius and establishing a reliable data +from which to work. We feel that these actions have never been properly +and thoroughly treated in simple language; we have tried to make them +plain so that anyone can comprehend them with a little study.</p> + +<p>Three good forms of ruby pins are the triangular, the oval and the flat +faced; for ordinary work the latter is as good as any, but for fine work +the triangular pin with the corners slightly rounded off is preferable.</p> + +<div class="center" style="width:550px;"> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 200px;"> +<a name="fig21" id="fig21"></a><img src="images/fig21.png" width="200" height="190" alt="A round ruby pin." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 21.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 300px;"> +<a name="fig22" id="fig22"></a><img src="images/fig22.png" width="300" height="291" alt="The fork standing against the bank." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 22.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p style="clear:both;">English watches are met with having a cylindrical or round ruby pin. +Such a pin should never be put into a watch. The law of the +parallelogram of forces is completely ignored by using such a pin; the +friction during the unlocking and impulse actions is too severe, as it +is, without the addition of so unmechanical an arrangement. <a href="#fig21">Fig. 21</a> +illustrates the action of a round ruby pin; <var>ii</var> is the path of the ruby +pin; <var>cc</var> that of the acting length of the fork. It is shown at the +moment the impulse is transmitted. It will be seen that the impact takes +place <em>below</em> the center of the ruby pin, whereas it should take place +at the center, as the motion of the fork is <em>upwards</em> and that of the +ruby<span class="num" title="Page 34"> </span><a name="p34" id="p34"></a> pin <em>downwards</em> until the line of the centers has been reached. +The same rule applies to the flat-faced pin and it is important that the +right quantity be ground off. We find that <abbr title="three sevenths"><sup>3</sup>⁄<sub>7</sub></abbr> is approximately the +amount which should be ground away. <a href="#fig22">Fig. 22</a> illustrates the fork +standing against the bank. The ruby pin touches the side of the slot but +has not as yet begun to act; <var>ri</var> is the real impulse circle for which +we allow <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> of freedom at the acting edge of the fork; the face of the +ruby pin is therefore on this line. The next thing to do is to find the +center of the pin. From the side <var>n</var> of the slot we construct the right +angle <var>o n t</var>; from <var>n</var>, we transmit <abbr title="one half">½</abbr> the width of the pin, and plant +the center <var>x</var> on the line <var>n t</var>. We can have the center of the pin +slightly below this line, but in no case above it; but if we put it +below, the pin will be thinner and therefore more easily broken.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 173px;"> +<img src="images/fig14.png" width="173" height="550" alt="Repetition of Figure 14 on fork and roller action." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 14.</p> +</div> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="safety" id="safety"></a>The Safety Action. </h2> +<p>Although this action is separate from the impulse +and unlocking actions, it is still very closely connected with them, +much more so in the single than in the double roller escapement. If we +were to place<span class="num" title="Page 35"> </span><a name="p35" id="p35"></a> the ruby pin at <var>X</var>, <a href="#fig14">Fig. 14</a>, we could have a much +smaller roller than by placing it at <var>P</var>. With the small roller the +safety action is more secure, as the intersection at <var>m</var> is greater than +at <var>k</var>. It is not as liable to “butt” and the friction is less when the +guard point is thrown against the small roller. Suppose we take two +rollers, one with a diameter of 2.5 mm., the other just twice this +amount, of 5 mm. By having the guard radius and pressure the same in +each case, if the guard point touched the larger roller it would not +only have twice, but four times more effect than on the smaller one. We +will notice that the smaller the impulse angle the larger the roller, +because the ruby pin is necessarily placed farther from the center. The +position of the ruby pin should, therefore, govern the size of the +roller, which should be as small as possible. There should only be +enough metal left between the circumference of the roller and the face +of the jewel to allow for a crescent or passing hollow of sufficient +depth and an efficient setting for the jewel. For this reason, as well +as securing the correct impulse radius and therefore angle, when +replacing the ruby pin, and having it set securely and mechanically in +the roller, it is necessary that the pin and the hole in the roller be +of the same form, and a good fit. <a href="#fig23">Fig. 23</a> illustrates the difference in +size of rollers. In the smaller one the conditions imposed are +satisfied, while in the larger one they are not. In the single roller +the safety action is at the mercy of the impulse and pallet angles. We +have noticed that in order to favor the impulse we require a large +roller, and for the safety action a small one, therefore escapements +made on fine principles are supplied with two rollers, one for each +action.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 200px;"> +<a name="fig23" id="fig23"></a><img src="images/fig23.png" width="200" height="197" alt="Illustrating the importance of the size of the roller." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 23.</p> +</div> + +<p>It may be well to say that in our opinion a proportion between the fork +and impulse angles in <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr> pallets of 3 or <abbr title="3 and a half">3½</abbr> to 1, <em>depending</em> upon the +size of the escapement, is the lowest which should be made in single +roller. We have seen them in proportions of 2 to 1 in single roller<span class="num" title="Page 36"> </span><a name="p36" id="p36"></a>—a +scientific principle foolishly applied—resulting in an action entirely +unsatisfactory.</p> + +<p>When the guard point is pressed against the roller the escape tooth must +still rest on the locking face of the pallet; if the total lock is <abbr title="2 degrees">2°</abbr>, by +allowing <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> freedom for the guard point between the bank and the roller +the escapement will still be locked <abbr title="three quarters of a degree">¾°</abbr>. How much this shake actually +amounts to depends upon the guard radius. Suppose this to be 4 mm., +then the freedom would equal 4 × 2 × 3.1416 ÷ 360 × 1.25 = .0873 mm.</p> + +<p><a name="crescent" id="crescent"></a><em>The Crescent</em> in the roller must be large and deep enough so it will be +impossible for the guard point to touch in or on the corners of it; at +the same time it must not be too large, as it would necessitate a longer +horn on the fork than is necessary.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 300px;"> +<a name="fig24" id="fig24"></a><img src="images/fig24.png" width="300" height="405" alt="The crescent." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 24.</p> +</div> + +<p><a href="#fig24">Fig. 24</a> shows the slot <var>n</var> of the fork standing at the bank. The ruby +pin <var>o</var> touches it, but has not as yet acted on it; <var>s s</var> illustrates a +single roller, while <var class="cap">S2</var> illustrates the safety roller for a double +roller escapement. In order to find the dimensions of the crescent in +the single roller we must proceed as follows: <var class="cap">WA</var> is in the center of the +fork when it rests against the bank, and is, therefore, one of the sides +of the fork angle, and is drawn from the pallet center; <var class="cap">V A W</var> is an +angle of <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>, which equals the freedom<span class="num" title="Page 37"> </span><a name="p37" id="p37"></a> between the guard point and the +roller; <var>g g</var> represents the path of the guard pin <var>u</var> for the single +roller, and is drawn at the intersection of <var class="cap">VA</var> with the roller <var class="cap">A′ A2</var> is +a line drawn from the balance center through that of the ruby pin, and +therefore also passes through the center of the crescent. By planting a +compass on this line, where it cuts the periphery of the roller, and +locating the point of intersection of <var class="cap">VA</var> with the roller, will give us +one-half the crescent, the remaining half being transferred to the +opposite side of the line <var class="cap">A′ A2</var>. We will notice that the guard point has +entered the crescent <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> before the fork begins to move.</p> + +<p>The angle of opening for the crescent in the double roller escapement is +greater than in the single, because it is placed closer to the balance +center, and the guard point or dart further from the pallet center, +causing a greater intersection; also the velocity of the guard point has +increased, while that of the safety roller has decreased. <a href="#fig24">Fig. 24</a>, at +<var>ff</var>, shows the path of the dart <var>h</var>, which also has <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> freedom between +bank and roller. From the balance center we draw <var class="cap">A′</var> <var>d</var> touching the +center or point of the dart; from this point we construct at <abbr title="5 degrees">5°</abbr> angle +<var>b</var> <var class="cap">A′</var> <var>d</var>. This is to ensure sufficient freedom for the dart when +entering the crescent. We plant a compass on the point of intersection +of <var class="cap">A′ A2</var> with the safety roller, <var class="cap">S2</var>, and locating the point where <var class="cap">A′</var><var>b</var> +intersects it, have found one-half the opening for the crescent, the +remaining half being constructed on the opposite side of the line <var class="cap">A′ A2</var>.</p> + +<p><a name="horn" id="horn"></a><em>The Horn</em> on the fork belongs to the safety action: more horn is +required with the double than with the single roller, on account of the +greater angle of opening for the crescent.</p> + +<p>The horn should be of such a length that when the crescent has passed +the guard point, the end of the horn should point to at least the center +of the ruby pin.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 300px;"> +<a name="fig25" id="fig25"></a><img src="images/fig25.png" width="300" height="369" alt="The horn." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 25.</p> +</div> + +<p>The dotted circle, <var>s s</var>, <a href="#fig25">Fig. 25</a>, represents a single roller. It will +be noticed that the corner of the crescent has passed<span class="num" title="Page 38"> </span><a name="p38" id="p38"></a> the guard pin <var>u</var> +by a considerable angle, and although this is so, in case of an accident +the <em>acting edge</em> of the fork would come in contact with the ruby pin; +this proves that a well made single roller escapement really requires +but little horn, only enough to ensure the safe entry of the ruby pin in +case the guard point at that moment be thrown against the roller. We +will now examine the question from the standpoint of the double roller; +<var class="cap">S2</var>, <a href="#fig25">Fig. 25</a>, is the safety roller; the corner of the crescent has safely +passed the dart <var>h</var>; the centers of the ruby pin <var>o</var> and of the crescent +being on the line <var class="cap">A′ A2</var>, we plant the compass on the pallet center and +the center of the face of the ruby pin and draw <var>k k</var>, which will be the +path described by the horn. The end of the horn is therefore planted +upon it from <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr> to <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr> from the ruby pin; this freedom at the end of +the horn is therefore from <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> to <abbr title="one half of a degree">½°</abbr> more than we allow for the guard +point; it depends upon the size of the escapement and locking angles +which we would choose. It must in any case be less than the lock on the +pallets, so that the fork will be drawn back against the bank in case +the horn be thrown against the ruby pin.</p> + +<p>When treating on the width of the ruby pin, we mentioned the Savage pin +roller escapement, which we illustrate in Figs. <a href="#fig26">26</a> and <a href="#fig27">27</a>. This +ingenious arrangement was designed with the view of combining the +advantages of both wide and narrow pins and at the same time without any +of their disadvantages.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width:550px;"> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 250px;"> +<a name="fig26" id="fig26"></a><img src="images/fig26.png" width="250" height="433" alt="The Savage pin roller escapement." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 26.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 250px;"> +<a name="fig27" id="fig27"></a><img src="images/fig27.png" width="250" height="433" alt="The Savage pin roller escapement." /> +<p class="caption"><ins class="corr" title="Transcriber’s note: Original labelled this figure 28.">Fig. 27</ins>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p>In <a href="#fig26">Fig. 26</a> we show the unlocking pins <var>u</var> beginning their action on the +line of centers—the best possible point—in unlocking the escapement. +These pins were made of gold in all which we examined, although it is +recorded that wide ruby pins and ruby rollers have been used in this +escapement, which would be preferable.</p> + +<p>The functions of the two pins in the roller are simply to unlock the +escapement; the impulse is not transmitted to them as is the case in the +ordinary fork and roller<span class="num" title="Page 39"> </span><a name="p39" id="p39"></a> action. In this action the guard pin <var>i</var> also +acts as the impulse pin. We will notice that the passing hollow in this +roller is a rectangular slot the same as in the ordinary fork. When the +escapement is being unlocked the guard pin <var>i</var> enters the hollow and +when the escape tooth comes into contact with the lifting plane of the +pallet the pin <var>i</var>, <a href="#fig27">Fig. 27</a>, transmits the impulse to the roller.</p> + +<p>The impulse is transmitted closer to the line of centers than could be +done with any ruby pin. If the pin <var>i</var> were wider the impulse would be +transmitted still closer to the line of centers, but the intersection of +it with the roller would be less. It is very delicate as it is, +therefore from a practical standpoint it ought to be made thin but +consistent with solidity. If the pin is anyway large, it should be +flattened on the sides, otherwise the friction would be similar to that +of the round ruby pin. It would also be preferable (on account of the +pin <var>i</var> being very easily bent)<span class="num" title="Page 40"> </span><a name="p40" id="p40"></a> to make the impulse piece narrow but of +such a length that it could be screwed to the fork, the same as the dart +in the double roller. The impulse radius is also the radius of the +roller, because the impulse is transmitted to the roller itself; for +this reason the latter is smaller in this action than in the ordinary +one having the same angles; also a shorter lever is in contact with a +longer one in the unlocking than in ordinary action of the same angles; +but for all this the pins <var>u u</var> should be pitched close to the edge of +the roller, as the angular connection of the balance with the escapement +would be increased during the unlocking action. This escapement being +very delicate requires a <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> pallet angle and a proportion between +impulse and pallet angles of not less than 3 to 1, which would mean an +impulse angle of <abbr title="36 degrees">36°</abbr>; this, together with the first rate workmanship +required are two of the reasons why this action is not often met with.</p> + +<p>George Savage, of London, England, invented this action. He was a +watchmaker who, in the early part of this century, did much to perfect +the lever escapement by good work and nice proportion, besides inventing +the two pin variety. He spent the early part of his life in Clerkenwell, +but in his old days emigrated to Canada, and founded a flourishing +retail business in Montreal, where he died. Some of George Savage’s +descendants are still engaged at the trade in Canada at the present day.</p> + +<p>The correct delineation of the lever escapement is a very important +matter. We illustrate one which is so delineated that it can be +practically produced. We have not noticed a draft of the lever +escapement, especially with equidistant pallets and club teeth, which +would act correctly in a watch.</p> + +<p>We have been aggressive in our work and have sometimes found theories +propounded and elongated which of themselves were not right; this may +have something to do with it, that we so often hear workmen say, “Theory +is no use, because if you work according to it your machine<span class="num" title="Page 41"> </span><a name="p41" id="p41"></a> will not +run.” We say, “No, sir, if your theory is not right in itself, then your +work will certainly not be correct; but if your theory be correct then +your work <em>must</em> be correct. Why? it simply cannot be otherwise.” We +will give it another name; let us say, apply sense, reason, thought, +experience and study to your work, and what have you done? You have +simply applied theory.</p> + +<p>A theorem is a proposition to be proved, not being able to prove it, we +must simply change it according as our experience dictates, this is +precisely what we have done with the escapement after having followed +the deductions of recognized authorities with the result that we can now +illustrate an escapement which has been thoroughly subjected to an +impartial analysis in every respect, and which is theoretically and +practically correct.</p> + +<p>We will not only give instructions for drafting the escapement now under +consideration, but will also make explanations how to draft it in +different positions, also in circular pallet and single roller. We are +convinced that by so doing we will do a service to many, we also wish to +avoid what we may call “the stereotyped” process, that is, one which may +be acquired by heart, but introduce any changes and perplexity is the +result. It is really not a difficult matter to draft escapements in +different positions, as an example will show.</p> + +<p>Before making a draft we must know exactly what we wish to produce. It +is well in drafting escapements to make them as large as possible, say +thirty to forty times larger than in the watch, in the present case the +size is immaterial, but we must have specifications for the proportions +of the angles. Our draft is to be the most difficult subject in lever +escapements; it is to be represented just as if it were working in a +watch; it is to represent a good and reliable action in every respect, +one which can be applied without special difficulty to a good watch, and +is to be “up to date” in every particular and to contain the majority<span class="num" title="Page 42"> </span><a name="p42" id="p42"></a> +of the best points and conclusions reached in our analysis.</p> + +<h2 class="run"><a name="spec" id="spec"></a>Specifications for Lever Escapement: </h2> +<p>The pallets are to be +equidistant; the wheel teeth of the “club” form; there are to be two +rollers; wheel, pallet, and balance centers are to be in straight line. +The lock is to be <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>, the run <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr>, making a total lock of <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr>; the +movement of pallets from drop to drop is to be <abbr title="10 degrees">10°</abbr>, while the fork is to +move through <abbr title="10 and a quarter degrees">10¼°</abbr> from bank to bank; the lift on the wheel teeth is to +be <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr>, while the remainder is to be the lift on the pallets as follows: +<abbr title="10 and a quarter">10¼</abbr> − (<abbr title="1 and three quarters">1¾</abbr> + 3) = <abbr title="5 and a half degrees">5½°</abbr> for lift of pallets.</p> + +<p>The wheel is to have 15 teeth, with pallets spanning 3 teeth or <abbr title="2 and a half">2½</abbr> +spaces, making the angle from lock to lock = 360 ÷ 15 × <abbr title="2 and a half">2½</abbr> = <abbr title="60 degrees">60°</abbr>, the +interval from tooth to tooth is 360 ÷ 15 = <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr>; divided by 2 +pallets = 24 ÷ 2 = <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> for width of tooth, pallet and drop; drop is to +be <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>, the tooth is to be <abbr title="three quarters">¾</abbr> the width of the pallet, making a tooth of +a width of <abbr title="4 and a half degrees">4½°</abbr> and a pallet of <abbr title="6 degrees">6°</abbr>.</p> + +<p>The draw is to be <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> on each pallet, while the locking faces of the +teeth are to incline <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr>. The acting length of fork is to be equal to +the distance of centers of scape wheel and pallets; the impulse angle is +to be <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr>; freedom from dart and safety, roller is to be <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>, and for +dart and corner of crescent <abbr title="5 degrees">5°</abbr>; freedom for ruby pin and acting edge of +fork is to be <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>; width of slot is to be <abbr title="one half">½</abbr> the total motion, or +<abbr title="10 and a quarter">10¼</abbr> ÷ 2 = <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>; shake of ruby pin in slot = <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr>, leaving <abbr title="5 and one eighth">5⅛</abbr> − <abbr title="one quarter">¼</abbr> = <abbr title="4 and seven eighths degrees">4⅞°</abbr> for +width of ruby pin.</p> + +<p>Radius of safety roller to be <abbr title="four sevenths"><sup>4</sup>⁄<sub>7</sub></abbr> of the theoretical impulse radius. The +length of horn is to be such that the end would point at least to the +center of the ruby pin when the edge of the crescent passes the dart; +space between the end of horn and ruby pin is to be <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>.</p> + +<p>It is well to know that the angles for width of teeth, pallets and drop +are measured from the wheel center, while the lifting and locking angles +are struck from the pallet<span class="num" title="Page 43"> </span><a name="p43" id="p43"></a> center, the draw from the locking corners of +the pallets, and the inclination of the teeth from the locking edge.</p> + +<p>In the fork and roller action, the angle of motion, the width of slot, +the ruby pin and its shake, the freedom between dart and roller, of ruby +pin with acting edge of fork and end of horn are all measured from the +pallet center, while the impulse angle and the crescent are measured +from the balance center. A sensible drawing board measures 17 × 24 +inches, we also require a set of good drawing instruments, the finer the +instruments the better; pay special attention to the compasses, pens and +protractor; add to this a straight ruler and set square.</p> + +<p>The best all-round drawing paper, both for India ink and colored work +has a rough surface; it must be fastened firmly and evenly to the board +by means of thumb tacks; the lines must be light and made with a hard +pencil. Use Higgins’ India ink, which dries rapidly.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"> +<img src="images/diagram_small.png" width="500" height="658" alt="Large diagram showing a complete lever escapement." /> +<p class="caption">[<a href="images/diagram_large.png">Larger image</a>.]</p> +</div> + +<p>We will begin by drawing the center line <var class="cap">A′ A B;</var> use the point <var class="cap">B</var> for the +escape center; place the compass on it and strike <var class="cap">G H</var>, the primitive or +geometrical circle of the escape wheel; set the center of the protractor +at <var class="cap">B</var> and mark off an angle of <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> on each side of the line of centers; +this will give us the angles <var class="cap">A B E</var> and <var class="cap">A B F</var> together, forming the angle +<var class="cap">F B E</var> of <abbr title="60 degrees">60°</abbr>, which represents from lock to lock of the pallets. Since +the chord of the angle of <abbr title="60 degrees">60°</abbr> is equal to the radius of the circle, this +gives us an easy means of verifying this angle by placing the compass at +the points of intersection of <var class="cap">F B</var> and <var class="cap">E B</var> with the primitive circle <var class="cap">G H</var>; +this distance must be equal to the radius of the circle. At these points +we will construct right angles to <var class="cap">E B</var> and <var class="cap">F B</var>, thus forming the tangents +<var class="cap">C A</var> and <var class="cap">D A</var> to the primitive circle <var class="cap">G H</var>. These tangents meet on the line +of centers at <var class="cap">A</var>, which will be the pallet center. Place the compass at <var class="cap">A</var> +and draw the locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var> at the points of intersection of <var class="cap">E B</var> and +<var class="cap">F B</var> with the primitive circle <var class="cap">G H</var>. The locking edges of the pallets will +always<span class="num" title="Page 44"> </span><a name="p44" id="p44"></a> +<!--<span class="num" title="Page 45"> </span><a name="p45" id="p45"></a>--> +stand on this circle no matter in what relation the pallets +stand to the wheel. Place the center of the protractor at <var class="cap">B</var> and draw the +angle of width of pallets of <abbr title="6 degrees">6°</abbr>; <var class="cap">I B E</var> being for the engaging and <var class="cap">J B F</var> +for the disengaging pallet. In the equidistant pallet <var class="cap">I B</var> is drawn on +the side towards the center, while <var class="cap">J B</var> is drawn further from the center. +If we were drawing a circular pallet, one-half the width of pallets +would be placed on each side of <var class="cap">E B</var> and <var class="cap">F B</var>. At the points of +intersection of <var class="cap">I B</var> and <var class="cap">J B</var> with the primitive circle <var class="cap">G H</var> we draw the +path <var class="cap">O</var> for the discharging edge of the engaging and <var class="cap">P</var> for that of the +disengaging pallet. The total lock being <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr>, we construct <var class="cap">V′ A</var> at this +angle from <var class="cap">C A</var>; the point of intersection of <var class="cap">V′ A</var> with the locking +circle <var class="cap">M N</var>, is the position of the locking corner of the engaging +pallet. The pallet having <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> draw when locked we place the center of +the protractor on this corner and draw the angle <var class="cap">Q M E</var>. <var class="cap">Q M</var> will be the +locking face of the engaging pallet. If the face of the pallet were on +the line <var class="cap">E B</var> there would be no draw, and if placed to the opposite side +of <var class="cap">E B</var> the tooth would repel the pallet, forming what is known as the +repellant escapement.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"> +<a name="fig28" id="fig28"></a><img src="images/fig28.png" width="500" height="427" alt="The pallets when unlocked." /> +<p class="caption">Fig. 28.</p> +</div> + +<p>Having shown how to delineate the locking face of the engaging pallet +when locked, we will now consider how to draft both it and the +disengaging pallet in correct positions when unlocked; to do so we +direct our attention until further notice to <a href="#fig28">Fig. 28</a>. The locking faces +<var class="cap">Q M</var> of the engaging and <var class="cap">S N</var> of the disengaging pallets are shown in +dotted lines <em>when locked</em>. We must now consider the relation which the +locking faces will bear to <var class="cap">E B</var> in the engaging, and to <var class="cap">F B</var> in the +disengaging pallets when unlocked. This is a question of some +importance; it is easy enough to represent the <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> from the <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> angles +when locked; we must be certain that they would occupy exactly that +position and yet show them unlocked; we shall take pains to do so. In +due time we shall show that there is no appreciable loss of lift on the +engaging pallet in the<span class="num" title="Page 46"> </span><a name="p46" id="p46"></a> escapement illustrated; the angle <var class="cap">T A V</var> +therefore shows the total lift; we have not shown the corresponding +angles on the disengaging side because the angles are somewhat +different, but the total lift is still the same. <var class="cap">G H</var> represents the +primitive circle of the escape wheel, and <var class="cap">X Z</var> that of the real, while +<var class="cap">M N</var> represents the circular course which the locking corners of the +pallets take in an equidistant escapement. At a convenient position we +will construct the circle <var class="cap">C C′ D</var> from the pallet center <var class="cap">A</var>. Notice the +points <var>e</var> and <var>c</var>, where <var class="cap">V A</var> and <var class="cap">T A</var> intersect this circle; the space +between <var>e</var> and <var>c</var> represents the extent of the motion of the pallets +at this particular distance from the center <var class="cap">A</var>; this being so, then let +us apply it to the engaging pallet. At the point of intersection <var>o</var> of +the dotted line <var class="cap">Q M</var> (which is an extended line on which the face of the +pallet lies when locked), with the circle <var class="cap">C C′ D</var>, we will plant our +dividers and transfer <var>e c</var> to <var>o n</var>. By setting our dividers on <var>o</var> <var class="cap">M</var> +and transferring to <var>n</var> <var class="cap">M′</var>, we will obtain the location of <var class="cap">Q′ M′</var>, the +locking face when unlocked. Let us now turn our attention<span class="num" title="Page 47"> </span><a name="p47" id="p47"></a> to the +disengaging pallet. The dotted line <var class="cap">S N</var> represents the location of the +locking face of the disengaging pallet when locked at an angle of <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> +from <var class="cap">F B</var>. At the intersection of <var class="cap">S N</var> with the circle <var class="cap">C C′ D</var> we obtain +the point <var>j</var>. The motion of the two pallets being equal, we transfer +the distance <var>e c</var> with the dividers from <var>j</var> and obtain the point <var>l</var>. +By setting the dividers on <var>j</var> <var class="cap">N</var> and transferring to <var>l</var> <var class="cap">N′</var> we draw the +line <var class="cap">S′ N′</var> on which the locking face of the disengaging pallet will be +located when unlocked. It will be perfectly clear to anyone that through +these means we can correctly represent the pallets in any desired +position.</p> + +<p>We will notice that the face <var class="cap">Q′ M′</var> of the engaging pallet when unlocked +stands at a greater angle to <var class="cap">E B</var> than it did when locked, while the +opposite is the case on the disengaging pallet, in which the angle +<var class="cap">S′ N′ F</var> is much less than <var class="cap">S N F</var>. This shows that the <em>deeper</em> the +engaging pallet locks, the lighter will the draw be, while the opposite +holds good with the disengaging pallet; also, that the draw increases +during the unlocking of the engaging, and decreases during the unlocking +of the disengaging pallet. These points show that the draw should be +measured with the <em>fork standing against the bank</em>; not when the locking +corner of the pallet stands on the primitive circle, as is so often +done. The recoil of the wheel (which determines the draw), is +illustrated by the difference between the locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var> and the +face <var class="cap">Q M</var> for the engaging, and <var class="cap">S N</var> for the disengaging pallet, and along +the <em>acting</em> surface it is alike on each pallet, showing that the draft +angle should be the same on each pallet.</p> + +<p>A number of years ago we constructed the escapement model which we +herewith illustrate. All the parts are adjustable; the pallets can be +moved in any direction, the draft angles can be changed at will. Through +this model we can practically demonstrate the points of which we have +spoken. Such a model can be made by workmen after studying these +papers.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"> +<img src="images/il049.png" width="350" height="693" alt="The adjustable model escapement." /> +</div> + +<p><span class="num" title="Page 48"> </span><a name="p48" id="p48"></a>In both the equidistant and circular pallets the locking face <var class="cap">S N</var> of the +disengaging pallet deviates more from the locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var> than does +the locking face <var class="cap">Q M</var> of the engaging pallet, as will be seen in the +diagram. This is because the draft angle is struck from <var class="cap">E B</var> which +deviates from the locking circle in such a manner, that if the face of a +pallet were planted on it and <em>locked deep enough</em> to<span class="num" title="Page 49"> </span><a name="p49" id="p49"></a> show it, the +wheel would actually <em>repel</em> the pallet, whereas with the disengaging +pallet if it were planted on <var class="cap">F B</var>, it would actually produce draw if +locked very deep; this is on account of the natural deviation of the <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> +lines from the locking circle. This difference is more pronounced in the +circular than in the equidistant pallet, because in the former we have +two locking circles, the larger one being for the engaging pallet, and +as an arc of a large circle does not deviate as much from a straight +line as does that of a smaller circle, it will be easily understood that +the natural difference before spoken of is only enhanced thereby. For +this reason in order to produce an <em>actual</em> draw of <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr>, the engaging +pallet may be set at a slightly greater angle from <var class="cap">E B</var> in the circular +escapement; the amount depends upon the width of the pallets; the +requirements are that the recoil of the wheel will be the same on each +pallet. We must, however, repeat that one of the most important points +is to measure the draw when the fork stands against the bank, thereby +<em>increasing</em> the draw on the engaging and <em>decreasing</em> that of the +disengaging pallet <em>during</em> the unlocking action, thus <em>naturally</em> +balancing one fault with another.</p> + +<p>We will again proceed with the delineation of the escapement here +illustrated. After having drawn the locking face <var class="cap">Q M</var>, we draw the angle +of width of teeth of <abbr title="4 and a half degrees">4½°</abbr>, by planting the protractor on the escape +center <var class="cap">B</var>. We measure the angle <var class="cap">E B K</var>, from the locking face of the +pallet; the line <var class="cap">E B</var> does not touch the locking face of the pallet at +the present time of contact with the tooth, therefore a line must be +drawn from the point of contact to the center <var class="cap">B</var>. We did so in our +drawing but do not illustrate it, as in a reduced engraving of this kind +it would be too close to <var class="cap">E B</var> and would only cause confusion. We will now +draw in the lifting angle of <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr> for the tooth. From the tangent <var class="cap">C A</var> we +draw <var class="cap">T A</var> at the required angle; at the point of intersection of <var class="cap">T A</var> with +the <abbr title="30 degrees">30°</abbr> line <var class="cap">E B</var> we have<span class="num" title="Page 50"> </span><a name="p50" id="p50"></a> the real circumference of the escape wheel. It +will only be necessary to connect the locking edge of the tooth with the +line <var class="cap">K B</var>, where the real or outer circle intersects it. It must be drawn +in the same manner in the circular escapement; if the tooth were drawn +up to the intersection of <var class="cap">K B</var> with <var class="cap">T A</var>, the lift would be too great, as +that point is further from the center <var class="cap">A</var> than the points of contact are.</p> + +<p>If the real or outer circle of the wheel intersects both the locking +circle <var class="cap">M N</var> and the path <var class="cap">O</var> of the discharging edge at the points where +<var class="cap">T A</var> intersects them, then there will be <em>no loss</em> of lift on the +engaging pallet. This is precisely how it is in the diagram; but if +there is any deviation, then the angle of loss must be measured on the +<em>real</em> diameter of the wheel and not on the primitive, as is usually +done, as the real diameter of the wheel, or in other words the heel of +the tooth, forms the last point of contact. With a wider tooth and a +greater lifting angle there will even be a <em>gain</em> of lift on the +engaging pallet; the pallet in such a case would actually require a +smaller lifting angle, according to the amount of gain. We gave full +directions for measuring the loss when describing its effects in <a href="#fig08">Fig. 8</a>. +Whatever the loss amounts to, it is added to the lifting plane of the +pallet. In the diagram under discussion there is no loss, consequently +the lifting angle on the pallet is to be <abbr title="5 and a half degrees">5½°</abbr>. From <var class="cap">V′ A</var> we draw <var class="cap">V A</var> at +the required angle; the point of intersection of <var class="cap">V A</var> with the path <var class="cap">O</var> +will be the discharging edge <var class="cap">O</var>. It will now only be necessary to connect +the locking corner <var class="cap">M</var> with it, and we have the lifting plane of the +pallet; the discharging side of the pallet is then drawn parallel to the +locking face and made a suitable length. We will now draw the locking +edges of the tooth by placing the center of the protractor on the +locking edge <var class="cap">M</var> and construct the angle <var class="cap">B M M′</var> of <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr> and draw a circle +from the scape center <var class="cap">B</var>, to which the line <var class="cap">M M′</var> will be a tangent. We +will utilize this circle in drawing in the faces of the other teeth +after having<span class="num" title="Page 51"> </span><a name="p51" id="p51"></a> spaced them off <abbr title="24 degrees">24°</abbr> apart, by simply putting a ruler on +the locking edges and on the periphery of the circle.</p> + +<p>We now construct <var class="cap">W′ A</var> as a tangent to the outer circle of the wheel, +thus forming the lifting angle <var class="cap">D A W′</var> of <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr> for the teeth; this +corresponds to the angle <var class="cap">T A C</var> on the engaging side. <var class="cap">W′ A</var> touches the +outer circle of the wheel at the intersection of <var class="cap">F B</var> with it. We will +notice that there is considerable deviation of <var class="cap">W′ A</var> from the circle at +the intersection of <var class="cap">J B</var> with it. At the intersecting of this point we +draw <var class="cap">U A</var>; the angle <var class="cap">U A W′</var> is the loss of lift. This angle must be added +to the lifting angle of the pallets; we see that in this action there is +no loss on the engaging pallet, but on the disengaging the loss amounts +to approximately <abbr title="seven eighths of a degree">⅞°</abbr> in the action illustrated. As we have allowed <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> of +run for the pallets, the discharging edge <var class="cap">P</var> is removed at this angle +from <var class="cap">U A</var>; we do not illustrate it, as the lines would cause confusion +being so close together. The lifting angle on the pallet is measured +from the point <var class="cap">P</var> and amounts to <abbr title="5 and a half degrees">5½°</abbr> + the angle of the loss; the angle +<var class="cap">W A U</var> embraces the above angles besides <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> for run. If the locks are +equal on each pallet, it proves that the lifts are also equal. This +gives us a practical method of proving the correctness of the drawing; +to do so, place the dividers on the locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var> at the +intersection of <var class="cap">T A</var> and <var class="cap">V A</var> with it, as this is the extent of motion; +transfer this measurement to <var class="cap">N</var>, if the <em>actual</em> lift is the same on each +pallet, the dividers will locate the point which the locking corner <var class="cap">N</var> +will occupy <em>when locked</em>; this, in the present case, will be at an +angle of <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr> below the tangent <var class="cap">D A</var>. By this simple method, the +correctness of our proposition that the loss of lift should be measured +from the outside circle of the wheel, can be proven. We often see the +loss measured for the engaging pallet on the primitive circumference +<var class="cap">G H</var>, and on the real circumference for the disengaging; if one is right +then the other must be wrong, as<span class="num" title="Page 52"> </span><a name="p52" id="p52"></a> there is a noticeable deviation of the +tangent <var class="cap">C A</var> from the primitive circle <var class="cap">G H</var> at the intersection of the +locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var>; had we added this amount to the lifting angle <var class="cap">V′ A V</var> +of the engaging pallet, the result would have been that the discharging +edge <var class="cap">O</var> would be over <abbr title="1 degrees">1°</abbr> below its present location, thus showing that by +the time the lift on the engaging pallet had been completed, the locking +corner <var class="cap">N</var> of the disengaging pallet would be locked at an angle of <abbr title="2 and three quarters of a degree">2¾°</abbr> +instead of only <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr>. Many watches contain precisely this fault. If we +wish to make a draft showing the pallets at any desired position, at the +center of motion for instance, with the fork standing on the line of +centers, we would proceed in the following manner: <abbr title="10 and a quarter degrees">10¼°</abbr> being the total +motion, one-half would equal <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>; as the total lock equals <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr>, we +deduct this amount from it which leaves <abbr title="5 and one eighth">5⅛</abbr> − <abbr title="1 and three quarters">1¾</abbr> = <abbr title="3 and three eighths degrees">3⅜°</abbr>, which is the +angle at which the locking corner <var class="cap">M</var> should be shown above the tangent +<var class="cap">C A</var>. Now let us see where the locking corner <var class="cap">N</var> should stand; <var class="cap">M</var> having +moved up <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>, therefore <var class="cap">N</var> moved down by that amount, the lift on the +pallet being <abbr title="5 and a half degrees">5½°</abbr> and on the tooth <abbr title="3 degrees">3°</abbr> (which is added to the tangent +<var class="cap">D A</var>), it follows that <var class="cap">N</var> should stand <abbr title="5 and a half">5½</abbr> + 3 − <abbr title="5 and one eighth">5⅛</abbr> = <abbr title="3 and three eighths degrees">3⅜°</abbr> above <var class="cap">D A</var>. We can +prove it by the lock, namely: <abbr title="3 and three eighths degrees">3⅜°</abbr> + <abbr title="1 and three quarters">1¾</abbr> = <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>, half the remaining motion. +This shows how simple it is to draft pallets in various positions, +remembering always to use the tangents to the primitive circle as +measuring points. We have fully explained how to draw in the draft angle +on the pallets when unlocked, and do not require to repeat it, except to +say, that most authorities draw a tangent <var class="cap">R N</var> to the locking circle <var class="cap">M N</var>, +forming in other words, the right angle <var class="cap">R N A</var>, then construct an angle +of <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> from <var class="cap">R N</var>. We have drawn ours in by our own method, which is the +correct one. While we here illustrate <var class="cap">S N R</var> at an angle of <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> it is in +reality <em>less</em> than that amount; had we constructed <var class="cap">S N</var> at an angle of +<abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> from <var class="cap">R N</var>, then the draw would be <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> from <var class="cap">F B</var>, when the primitive +circumference of the wheel is<span class="num" title="Page 53"> </span><a name="p53" id="p53"></a> reached, but <em>more</em> than <abbr title="12 degrees">12°</abbr> when the +fork is against the bank.</p> + +<p>The space between the discharging edge <var class="cap">P</var> and the heel of the tooth forms +the angle of drop <var class="cap">J B I</var> of <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>; the definition for drop is that it is +the freedom for wheel and pallet. This is not, strictly speaking, +perfectly correct, as, during the unlocking action there will be a +recoil of the wheel to the extent of the draft angle; the heel of the +tooth will therefore approach the edge <var class="cap">P</var>, and the discharging side of +the pallet approaches the tooth, as only the discharging edge moves on +the path <var class="cap">P</var>.</p> + +<p>A good length for the teeth is <abbr title="one tenth"><sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>10</sub></abbr> the diameter of the wheel, measured +from the primitive diameter and from the locking edge of the tooth.</p> + +<p>The backs of the teeth are hollowed out so as not to interfere with the +pallets, and are given a nice form; likewise the rim and arms are drawn +in as light and as neat as possible, consistent with strength.</p> + +<p>Having explained the delineation of the wheel and pallet action we will +now turn our attention to that of the fork and roller. We tried to +explain these actions in such a manner that by the time we came to +delineate them no difficulty would be found, as in our analysis we +discussed the subject sufficiently to enable any one of ordinary +intelligence to obtain a correct knowledge of them. The fork and roller +action in straight line, right, or any other angle is delineated after +the methods we are about to give.</p> + +<p>We specified that the acting length of fork was to be equal to the +center distance of wheel and pallets; this gives a fork of a fair +length.</p> + +<p>Having drawn the line of centers <var class="cap">A′ A</var> we will construct an angle equal +to half the angular motion of the pallets; the latter in the case under +consideration being <abbr title="10 and a quarter degrees">10¼°</abbr>, therefore <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr> is spaced off on each side of +the line of centers, forming the angles <var>m</var> <var class="cap">A</var> <var>k</var> of <abbr title="10 and a quarter degrees">10¼°</abbr>. Placing our +dividers on <var class="cap">A B</var> the center distance of ’scape wheel and<span class="num" title="Page 54"> </span><a name="p54" id="p54"></a> pallets, we +plant them on <var class="cap">A</var> and construct <var>c c</var>; thus we will have the acting length +of fork and its path. We saw in our analysis that the impulse angle +should be as small as possible. We will use one of <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr> in our draft of +the double roller; we might however remark that this angle should vary +with the construction of the escapements in different watches; if too +small, the balance may be stopped when the escapement is locked, while +if too great it can be stopped during the lift; both these defects are +to be avoided. The angles being respectively <abbr title="10 and a quarter degrees">10¼°</abbr> and <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr> it follows +they are of the following proportions: <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr> ÷ 10.25 = 2.7316. The impulse +radius therefore bears this relation (but in the inverse ratio to the +angles), to the acting length of fork.</p> + +<p>We will put it in the following proportion; let A<var>c</var> equal acting length +of fork, and <var>x</var> the unknown quantity; 28<abbr title="is to">∶</abbr>10.25 <abbr title="as">∷</abbr> A<var>c</var><abbr title="is to">∶</abbr><var>x</var>; the answer +will be the theoretical impulse radius. Having found the required radius +we plant one jaw of our measuring instrument on the point of +intersection of <var>c c</var> with <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A</var> or <var>m</var> <var class="cap">A</var> and locate the other jaw on +the line of centers; we thus obtain <var class="cap">A′</var> the balance center. Through the +points of intersection before designated we will draft <var class="cap">X A′</var> and <var class="cap">Y A′</var> +forming the impulse angle <var class="cap">X A′ Y</var> of <abbr title="28 degrees">28°</abbr>. At the intersection of this +angle with the fork angle <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A′</var> <var>m</var>, we draw <var>i i</var> from the center <var class="cap">A</var>; +this gives us the theoretical impulse circle. The total lock being <abbr title="1 and three quarters of a degree">1¾°</abbr> +it follows that the angle described by the balance in unlocking += <abbr title="1 and three quarters">1¾</abbr> × 2.7316 = 4.<abbr title="788 degrees">788°</abbr>. According to the specifications the width of +slot is to be <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>; placing the center of the protractor on <var class="cap">A</var> we +construct half of this angle on each side of <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A</var>, which passes through +the center of the fork when it rests against the bank; this gives us the +angle <var>s</var> <var class="cap">A</var> <var>n</var> of <abbr title="5 and one eighth degrees">5⅛°</abbr>. If the disengaging pallet were shown locked then +<var>m</var> <var class="cap">A</var> would represent the center of the fork. The slot is to be made of +sufficient depth so there will be no possibility of the ruby pin +touching the bottom of it. The ruby pin is to have <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr> freedom in +passing the acting edge of the fork; from the<span class="num" title="Page 55"> </span><a name="p55" id="p55"></a> center <var class="cap">A</var> we construct the +angle <var>t</var> <var class="cap">A</var> <var>n</var> of <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>; at the point of intersection of <var>t</var> <var class="cap">A</var> with <var>c c</var> +the acting radius of the fork, we locate the real impulse radius and +draw the arc <var>ri ri</var> which describes the path made by the face of the +ruby pin. The ruby pin is to have <abbr title="one quarter of a degree">¼°</abbr> of shake in the slot; it will +therefore have a width of <abbr title="4 and seven eighths degrees">4⅞°</abbr>; this width is drawn in with the ruby pin +imagined as standing over the line of centers and is then transferred to +the position which the ruby pin is to occupy in the drawing.</p> + +<p>The radius of the safety roller was given as <abbr title="four sevenths"><sup>4</sup>⁄<sub>7</sub></abbr> of the theoretical +impulse radius. They may be made of various proportions; thus <abbr title="two thirds">⅔</abbr> is often +used. Remember that the smaller we make it, the less the friction during +accidental contact with the guard pin, the greater must the passing +hollow be and the horn of fork and guard point must be longer, which +increases the weight of the fork.</p> + +<p>Having drawn in the safety roller, and having specified that the freedom +between the dart and safety roller was to be <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>, the dart being in the +center of the fork, consequently <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A</var> is the center of it; therefore we +construct the angle <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A X</var> of <abbr title="1 and a quarter degrees">1¼°</abbr>. At the point of intersection of <var class="cap">X A</var> +with the safety roller we draw the arc <var>g g</var>; this locates the point of +the dart which we will now draw in. We will next draw <var>d</var> <var class="cap">A′</var> from the +balance center and touching the point of the dart; we now construct +<var>b</var> <var class="cap">A′</var> at an angle of <abbr title="5 degrees">5°</abbr> to it. This is to allow the necessary freedom +for the dart when entering the crescent; from <var class="cap">A′</var> we draw a line through +the center of the ruby pin. We do not show it in the drawing, as it +would be indiscernible, coming very close to <var class="cap">A′ X</var>. This line will also +pass through the center of the crescent. At the point of intersection of +<var class="cap">A′ </var><var>b</var> with the safety roller we have one of the edges of the crescent. By +placing our compass at the center of the crescent on the periphery of +the roller and on the edge which we have just found, it follows that our +compass will span the radius of the crescent. We now sweep the arc for +the latter, thus also drawing in the remaining<span class="num" title="Page 56"> </span><a name="p56" id="p56"></a> half of the crescent on +the other side of <var class="cap">A′ X</var> and bringing the crescent of sufficient depth +that no possibility exists of the dart touching in or on the edges of +it. We will now draw in the impulse roller and make it as light as +possible consistent with strength. A hole is shown through the impulse +roller to counterbalance the reduced weight at the crescent. When +describing <a href="#fig24">Fig. 24</a>, we gave instructions for finding the dimensions of +crescent and position of guard pin for the single roller. We will find +the length of horn; to do so we must closely follow directions given for +<a href="#fig25">Fig. 25</a>. In locating the end of the horn, we must find the location of +the center of the crescent and ruby pin <em>after</em> the edge of the crescent +has passed the dart. From the point of intersection of <var class="cap">A′</var> <var>b</var> with the +safety roller we transfer the radius of the crescent on the periphery of +the safety roller towards the side against the bank, then draw a line +from <var class="cap">A′</var> through the point so found. At point of intersection of this +line with the real impulse circle <var>r i r i</var> we draw an arc radiating +from the pallet center; the end of the horn will be located on this arc. +In our drawing the arc spoken of coincides with the dart radius <var>g g</var>. +As before pointed out, we gave particulars when treating on <a href="#fig25">Fig. 25</a>, +therefore considered it unnecessary to further complicate the draft by +the addition of all the constructional lines. We specified that the +freedom between ruby pin and end of horn was to be <abbr title="1 and a half degrees">1½°</abbr>; these lines +(which we do not show) are drawn from the pallet center. Having +located the end of the horn on the side standing against the bank, we +place the dividers on it and on the point of intersection of <var>k</var> <var class="cap">A</var> with +<var>g g</var>—which in this case is on the point of the dart,—and transfer +this measurement along <var>g g</var> which will locate the end of the horn on +the opposite side.</p> + +<p>We have the acting edges of the fork on <var>cc</var> and have also found the +position of the ends of the horns; their curvature is drawn in the +following manner: We place our compasses on <var class="cap">A</var> and <var>r i</var>, spanning +therefore the real impulse<span class="num" title="Page 57"> </span><a name="p57" id="p57"></a> radius; the compass is now set on the acting +edge of the fork and an arc swept with it which is then to be +intersected by another arc swept from the end of the horn, on the same +side of the fork. At the point of intersection of the arcs the compass +is planted and the curvature of the horn drawn in, the same operation is +to be repeated with the other horn. We will now draw in the sides of the +horn of such a form that should the watch rebank, the side of the ruby +pin will squarely strike the fork. If the back of the ruby pin strikes +the fork there will be a greater tendency of breaking it and injuring +the pivots on account of acting like a wedge. The fork and pallets are +now drawn in as lightly as possible and of such form as to admit of +their being readily poised. The banks are to be drawn at equal distances +from the line of centers. In delineating the fork and roller action in +any desired position, it must be remembered that the points of location +of the real impulse radius, the end of horn, the dart or guard pin and +crescent, must <em>all</em> be obtained <em>when standing against the bank</em>, and +the arcs drawn which they describe; the parts are then located according +to the angle at which they are removed from the banks.</p> + +<p>We think the instructions given are ample to enable any one to master +the subject. We may add that when one becomes well acquainted with the +escapement, many of the angles radiating from a common center, may be +drawn in at once. We had intended describing the mechanical construction +of the escapement, which does unmistakably present some difficulties on +account of the small dimensions of the parts, but nevertheless it can be +mechanically executed true to the principles enumerated. We have evolved +a method of so producing them that young men in a comparatively short +period have made them from their drafts (without automatic machinery) +that their watches start off when run down the moment the crown is +touched. Perhaps later on we will write up the subject. It is our +intention of doing so, as we make use of such explanations in our +regular work.</p> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by +H. R. Playtner + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + +***** This file should be named 21978-h.htm or 21978-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/1/9/7/21978/ + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/21978-h/images/diagram_large.png b/21978-h/images/diagram_large.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5cda858 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/diagram_large.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/diagram_small.png b/21978-h/images/diagram_small.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1918484 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/diagram_small.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig01.png b/21978-h/images/fig01.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2fd662 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig01.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig02.png b/21978-h/images/fig02.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9ce5aa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig02.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig03.png b/21978-h/images/fig03.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a83e15 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig03.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig04.png b/21978-h/images/fig04.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..551795c --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig04.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig05.png b/21978-h/images/fig05.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4aa56e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig05.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig06.png b/21978-h/images/fig06.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ef2585 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig06.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig07.png b/21978-h/images/fig07.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..77caad9 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig07.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig08.png b/21978-h/images/fig08.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0c69b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig08.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig09.png b/21978-h/images/fig09.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..50e97f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig09.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig10.png b/21978-h/images/fig10.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a168dc --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig10.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig11.png b/21978-h/images/fig11.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5572f8b --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig11.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig12.png b/21978-h/images/fig12.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..79b9228 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig12.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig13.png b/21978-h/images/fig13.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5a5ab0e --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig13.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig14.png b/21978-h/images/fig14.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..132f74a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig14.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig15.png b/21978-h/images/fig15.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..eaf7edb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig15.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig16.png b/21978-h/images/fig16.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e5e0cd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig16.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig17.png b/21978-h/images/fig17.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b79a5a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig17.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig18.png b/21978-h/images/fig18.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b606af --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig18.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig19.png b/21978-h/images/fig19.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3a6003d --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig19.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig20.png b/21978-h/images/fig20.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8097bbb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig20.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig21.png b/21978-h/images/fig21.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a189a6b --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig21.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig22.png b/21978-h/images/fig22.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f7d76fd --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig22.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig23.png b/21978-h/images/fig23.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..af062f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig23.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig24.png b/21978-h/images/fig24.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d50f4ed --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig24.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig25.png b/21978-h/images/fig25.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..65658f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig25.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig26.png b/21978-h/images/fig26.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..effed47 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig26.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig27.png b/21978-h/images/fig27.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6970345 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig27.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/fig28.png b/21978-h/images/fig28.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3bfb3fc --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/fig28.png diff --git a/21978-h/images/frontis.jpg b/21978-h/images/frontis.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b69e25b --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/frontis.jpg diff --git a/21978-h/images/il049.png b/21978-h/images/il049.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..390a0de --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-h/images/il049.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f001-image.jpg b/21978-page-images/f001-image.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0f59459 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f001-image.jpg diff --git a/21978-page-images/f001.png b/21978-page-images/f001.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e886078 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f001.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f002.png b/21978-page-images/f002.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..09c95fe --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f002.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f003.png b/21978-page-images/f003.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec57d99 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f003.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f004.png b/21978-page-images/f004.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e1cd024 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f004.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f005.png b/21978-page-images/f005.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..595a489 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f005.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/f006.png b/21978-page-images/f006.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6df8dfa --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/f006.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p007.png b/21978-page-images/p007.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..83b2417 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p007.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p008.png b/21978-page-images/p008.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2adf34a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p008.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p009.png b/21978-page-images/p009.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6834855 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p009.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p009a-image.png b/21978-page-images/p009a-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..91a145f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p009a-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p009b-image.png b/21978-page-images/p009b-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac1b2c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p009b-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p010-image.png b/21978-page-images/p010-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2452dca --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p010-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p010.png b/21978-page-images/p010.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a622e3d --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p010.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p011.png b/21978-page-images/p011.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d204a77 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p011.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p012-image.png b/21978-page-images/p012-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d2009f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p012-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p012.png b/21978-page-images/p012.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3e1e9c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p012.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p013.png b/21978-page-images/p013.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..89d6094 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p013.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p014-image.png b/21978-page-images/p014-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1918d4d --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p014-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p014.png b/21978-page-images/p014.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7980120 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p014.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p015-image.png b/21978-page-images/p015-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2704172 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p015-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p015.png b/21978-page-images/p015.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f4169d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p015.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p016-image.png b/21978-page-images/p016-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8ddedc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p016-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p016.png b/21978-page-images/p016.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab6a2e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p016.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p017-image.png b/21978-page-images/p017-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5865b5f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p017-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p017.png b/21978-page-images/p017.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d67ed44 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p017.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p018.png b/21978-page-images/p018.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ccd6fb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p018.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p019-image.png b/21978-page-images/p019-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..16f4eca --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p019-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p019.png b/21978-page-images/p019.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8c06399 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p019.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p020-image.png b/21978-page-images/p020-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3704702 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p020-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p020.png b/21978-page-images/p020.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fc2886 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p020.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p021.png b/21978-page-images/p021.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bfda521 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p021.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p021a-image.png b/21978-page-images/p021a-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..efcc359 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p021a-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p021b-image.png b/21978-page-images/p021b-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ba089a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p021b-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p022-image.png b/21978-page-images/p022-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2e73bb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p022-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p022.png b/21978-page-images/p022.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a9685b --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p022.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p023-image.png b/21978-page-images/p023-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..77297fb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p023-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p023.png b/21978-page-images/p023.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4742adb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p023.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p024-image.png b/21978-page-images/p024-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..469e4ce --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p024-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p024.png b/21978-page-images/p024.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a7ebac --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p024.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p025.png b/21978-page-images/p025.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..eaf8ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p025.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p026.png b/21978-page-images/p026.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..77ef8e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p026.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p027-image.png b/21978-page-images/p027-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..39d1c5a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p027-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p027.png b/21978-page-images/p027.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe8a221 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p027.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p028.png b/21978-page-images/p028.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..af8099f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p028.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p029.png b/21978-page-images/p029.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9fb98bc --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p029.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p030.png b/21978-page-images/p030.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f61195e --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p030.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p031-image.png b/21978-page-images/p031-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..085d3bd --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p031-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p031.png b/21978-page-images/p031.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9de65a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p031.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p032.png b/21978-page-images/p032.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5fdaf9c --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p032.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p033-image.png b/21978-page-images/p033-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e77a0f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p033-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p033.png b/21978-page-images/p033.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f7637b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p033.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p034-image.png b/21978-page-images/p034-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b72c9d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p034-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p034.png b/21978-page-images/p034.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e1b0cd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p034.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p035.png b/21978-page-images/p035.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3eb5348 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p035.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p036-image.png b/21978-page-images/p036-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d87c8c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p036-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p036.png b/21978-page-images/p036.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..abcd3ce --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p036.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p037.png b/21978-page-images/p037.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..52bd032 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p037.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p038.png b/21978-page-images/p038.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e5c91f --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p038.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p039-image.png b/21978-page-images/p039-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7c31fec --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p039-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p039.png b/21978-page-images/p039.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc3e9ae --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p039.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p040.png b/21978-page-images/p040.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..caa710c --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p040.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p041.png b/21978-page-images/p041.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..51939a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p041.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p042.png b/21978-page-images/p042.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..38e5896 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p042.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p043.png b/21978-page-images/p043.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..67682bf --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p043.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p044-image.png b/21978-page-images/p044-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f796946 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p044-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p044.png b/21978-page-images/p044.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ba67b54 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p044.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p045.png b/21978-page-images/p045.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cce8b86 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p045.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p046-image.png b/21978-page-images/p046-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4845cd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p046-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p046.png b/21978-page-images/p046.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ca81f35 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p046.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p047.png b/21978-page-images/p047.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..65ac861 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p047.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p048-image.png b/21978-page-images/p048-image.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf99598 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p048-image.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p048.png b/21978-page-images/p048.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e6a5625 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p048.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p049.png b/21978-page-images/p049.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d30cc5d --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p049.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p050.png b/21978-page-images/p050.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..65ecfcb --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p050.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p051.png b/21978-page-images/p051.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9eda658 --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p051.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p052.png b/21978-page-images/p052.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..077b9ad --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p052.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p053.png b/21978-page-images/p053.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..464e6bf --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p053.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p054.png b/21978-page-images/p054.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..609722a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p054.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p055.png b/21978-page-images/p055.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd1073b --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p055.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p056.png b/21978-page-images/p056.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..51a56fa --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p056.png diff --git a/21978-page-images/p057.png b/21978-page-images/p057.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b915b0c --- /dev/null +++ b/21978-page-images/p057.png diff --git a/21978.txt b/21978.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c6e066a --- /dev/null +++ b/21978.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2009 @@ +Project Gutenberg's An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by H. R. Playtner + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: An Analysis of the Lever Escapement + +Author: H. R. Playtner + +Release Date: June 30, 2007 [EBook #21978] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + + + + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + + +[Illustration: THOMAS MUDGE + +_The first Horologist who successfully applied the Detached Lever +Escapement to Watches._ + +_Born 1715--Died 1794._] + + + + +AN ANALYSIS + +OF THE + +LEVER ESCAPEMENT + +BY H. R. PLAYTNER. + +A LECTURE DELIVERED BEFORE THE CANADIAN WATCHMAKERS' AND RETAIL +JEWELERS' ASSOCIATION. + +ILLUSTRATED. + +CHICAGO: + +HAZLITT & WALKER, PUBLISHERS. + +1910. + + + + +PREFACE. + + +Before entering upon our subject proper, we think it advisable to +explain a few points, simple though they are, which might cause +confusion to some readers. Our experience has shown us that as soon as +we use the words "millimeter" and "degree," perplexity is the result. +"What is a millimeter?" is propounded to us very often in the course of +a year; nearly every new acquaintance is interested in having the metric +system of measurement, together with the fine gauges used, explained to +him. + +The metric system of measurement originated at the time of the French +Revolution, in the latter part of the 18th century; its divisions are +decimal, just the same as the system of currency we use in this country. + +A meter is the ten millionth part of an arc of the meridian of Paris, +drawn from the equator to the north pole; as compared with the English +inch there are 39+3708/10000 inches in a meter, and there are +25.4 millimeters in an inch. + +The meter is sub-divided into decimeters, centimeters and millimeters; +1,000 millimeters equal one meter; the millimeter is again divided into +10ths and the 10ths into 100ths of a millimeter, which could be +continued indefinitely. The 1/100 millimeter is equal to the 1/2540 of +an inch. These are measurements with which the watchmaker is concerned. +1/100 millimeter, written .01 mm., is the side shake for a balance +pivot; multiply it by 2 1/4 and we obtain the thickness for the spring +detent of a pocket chronometer, which is about 1/3 the thickness of a +human hair. + +The metric system of measurement is used in all the watch factories of +Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United States, and nearly all the +lathe makers number their chucks by it, and some of them cut the leading +screws on their slide rests to it. + +In any modern work on horology of value, the metric system is used. +Skilled horologists use it on account of its _convenience_. The +millimeter is a unit which can be handled on the small parts of a watch, +whereas the inch must always be divided on anything smaller than the +plates. + +Equally as fine gauges can be and are made for the inch as for the +metric system, and the inch is decimally divided, but we require another +decimal point to express our measurement. + +Metric gauges can now be procured from the material shops; they consist +of tenth measures, verniers and micrometers; the finer ones of these +come from Glashutte, and are the ones mentioned by Grossmann in his +essay on the lever escapement. Any workman who has once used these +instruments could not be persuaded to do without them. + +No one can comprehend the geometrical principles employed in escapements +without a knowledge of angles and their measurements, therefore we deem +it of sufficient importance to at least explain what a degree is, as we +know for a fact, that young workmen especially, often fail to see how to +apply it. + +Every circle, no matter how large or small it may be, contains 360deg.; a +degree is therefore the 360th part of a circle; it is divided into +minutes, seconds, thirds, etc. + +To measure the _value_ of a degree of any circle, we must multiply the +diameter of it by 3.1416, which gives us the circumference, and then +divide it by 360. It will be seen that it depends on the size of that +circle or its radius, as to the value of a degree in any _actual_ +measurement. To illustrate; a degree on the earth's circumference +measures 60 geographical miles, while measured on the circumference of +an escape wheel 7.5 mm. in diameter, or as they would designate it in a +material shop, No. 7 1/2, it would be 7.5 x 3.1416 / 360 = .0655 mm., which +is equal to the breadth of an ordinary human hair; it is a degree in +both cases, but the difference is very great, therefore a degree cannot +be associated with any actual measurement until the radius of the +circle is known. Degrees are generated from the center of the circle, +and should be thought of as to ascension or direction and relative +value. Circles contain four right angles of 90deg. each. Degrees are +commonly measured by means of the protractor, although the ordinary +instruments of this kind leave very much to be desired. The lines can be +verified by means of the compass, which is a good practical method. + +It may also be well to give an explanation of some of the terms used. + +_Drop_ equals the amount of freedom which is allowed for the action of +pallets and wheel. See Z, Fig. 1. + +_Primitive or Geometrical Diameter._--In the ratchet tooth or English +wheel, the primitive and real diameter are equal; in the club tooth +wheel it means across the locking corners of the teeth; in such a wheel, +therefore, the primitive is _less_ than the real diameter by the height +of two impulse planes. + +_Lock_ equals the depth of locking, measured from the locking corner of +the pallet at the moment the drop has occurred. + +_Run_ equals the amount of angular motion of pallets and fork to the +bankings _after_ the drop has taken place. + +_Total Lock_ equals lock plus run. + +A _Tangent_ is a line which _touches_ a curve, but does not intersect +it. AC and AD, Figs. 2 and 3, are tangents to the primitive circle GH at +the points of intersection of EB, AC, and GH and FB, AD and GH. + +_Impulse Angle_ equals the angular connection of the impulse or ruby pin +with the lever fork; or in other words, of the balance with the +escapement. + +_Impulse Radius._--From the face of the impulse jewel to the center of +motion, which is in the balance staff, most writers assume the impulse +angle and radius to be equal, and it is true that they must conform with +one another. We have made a radical change in the radius and one which +does not affect the angle. We shall prove this in due time, and also +that the wider the impulse pin the greater must the impulse radius be, +although the angle will remain unchanged. + +Right here we wish to put in a word of advice to all young men, and that +is to learn to draw. No one can be a thorough watchmaker unless he can +draw, because he cannot comprehend his trade unless he can do so. + +We know what it has done for us, and we have noticed the same results +with others, therefore we speak from personal experience. Attend night +schools and mechanic's institutes and improve yourselves. + +The young workmen of Toronto have a great advantage in the Toronto +Technical School, but we are sorry to see that out of some 600 students, +only five watchmakers attended last year. We can account for the +majority of them, so it would seem as if the young men of the trade were +not much interested, or thought they could not apply the knowledge to be +gained there. This is a great mistake; we might almost say that +knowledge of any kind can be applied to horology. The young men who take +up these studies, will see the great advantage of them later on; one +workman will labor intelligently and the other do blind "guess" work. + +We are now about to enter upon our subject and deem it well to say, we +have endeavored to make it as plain as possible. It is a deep subject +and is difficult to treat lightly; we will treat it in our own way, +paying special attention to all these points which bothered us during +the many years of painstaking study which we gave to the subject. We +especially endeavor to point out how theory can be applied to practice; +while we cannot expect that everyone will understand the subject without +study, we think we have made it comparatively easy of comprehension. + +We will give our method of drafting the escapement, which happens in +some respects to differ from others. We believe in making a drawing +which we can reproduce in a watch. + + + + +AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER ESCAPEMENT. + + +The lever escapement is derived from Graham's dead-beat escapement for +clocks. Thomas Mudge was the first horologist who successfully applied +it to watches in the detached form, about 1750. The locking faces of the +pallets were arcs of circles struck from the pallet centers. Many +improvements were made upon it until to-day it is the best form of +escapement for a general purpose watch, and when made on mechanical +principles is capable of producing first rate results. + +Our object will be to explain the whys and wherefores of this +escapement, and we will at once begin with the number of teeth in the +escape wheel. It is not obligatory in the lever, as in the verge, to +have an uneven number of teeth in the wheel. While nearly all have 15 +teeth, we might make them of 14 or 16; occasionally we find some in +complicated watches of 12 teeth, and in old English watches, of 30, +which is a clumsy arrangement, and if the pallets embrace only three +teeth in the latter, the pallet center cannot be pitched on a tangent. + +Although advisable from a timing standpoint that the teeth in the escape +wheel should divide evenly into the number of beats made per minute in a +watch with seconds hand, it is not, strictly speaking, necessary that it +should do so, as an example will show. We will take an ordinary watch, +beating 300 times per minute; we will fit an escape wheel of 16 teeth; +multiply this by 2, as there is a forward and then a return motion of +the balance and consequently two beats for each tooth, making +16 x 2 = 32 beats for each revolution of the escape wheel. 300 beats are +made per minute; divide this by the beats made on each revolution, and +we have the number of times in which the escape wheel revolves per +minute, namely, 300 / 32 = 9.375. This number then is the proportion +existing for the teeth and pitch diameters of the 4th wheel and escape +pinion. We must now find a suitable number of teeth for this wheel and +pinion. Of available pinions for a watch, the only one which would +answer would be one of 8 leaves, as any other number would give a +fractional number of teeth for the 4th wheel, therefore 9.375 x 8 = 75 +teeth in 4th wheel. Now as to the proof: as is well known, if we +multiply the number of teeth contained in 4th and escape wheels also by +2, for the reason previously given, and divide by the leaves in the +escape pinion, we get the number of beats made per minute; therefore +(75 x 16 x 2)/8 = 300 beats per minute. + +Pallets can be made to embrace more than three teeth, but would be much +heavier and therefore the mechanical action would suffer. They can also +be made to embrace fewer teeth, but the necessary side shake in the +pivot holes would prove very detrimental to a total lifting angle of +10deg., which represents the angle of movement in modern watches. Some of +the finest ones only make 8 or 9deg. of a movement; the smaller the angle +the greater will the effects of defective workmanship be; 10deg. is a +common-sense angle and gives a safe escapement capable of fine results. +Theoretically, if a timepiece could be produced in which the balance +would vibrate without being connected with an escapement, we would have +reached a step nearer the goal. Practice has shown this to be the proper +theory to work on. Hence, the smaller the pallet and impulse angles the +less will the balance and escapement be connected. The chronometer is +still more highly detached than the lever. + +The pallet embracing three teeth is sound and practical, and when +applied to a 15 tooth wheel, this arrangement offers certain geometrical +and mechanical advantages in its construction, which we will notice in +due time. 15 teeth divide evenly into 360deg. leaving an interval of 24deg. +from tooth to tooth, which is also the angle at which the locking faces +of the teeth are inclined from the center, which fact will be found +convenient when we come to cut our wheel. + +From locking to locking on the pallet scaping over three teeth, the +angle is 60deg., which is equal to 2 1/2 spaces of the wheel. Fig. 1 +illustrates the lockings, spanning this arc. If the pallets embraced 4 +teeth, the angle would be 84deg.; or in case of a 16 tooth wheel scaping +over three teeth, the angle would be 360 x 2.5/16 = 56 1/4deg. + +[Illustration: Fig. 1.] + +Pallets may be divided into two kinds, namely: equidistant and circular. +The equidistant pallet is so-called because the lockings are an equal +distance from the center; sometimes it is also called the tangential +escapement, on account of the unlocking taking place on the intersection +of tangent AC with EB, and FB with AD, the tangents, which is the +valuable feature of this form of escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +AC and AD, Fig. 2, are tangents to the primitive circle GH. ABE and ABF +are angles of 30deg. each, together therefore forming the angle FBE of +60deg. The locking circle MN is struck from the pallet center A; the +interangles being equal, consequently the pallets must be equidistant. + +The weak point of this pallet is that the lifting is not performed so +favorably; by examining the lifting planes MO and NP, we see that the +discharging edge, O, is closer to the center, A, than the discharging +edge, P; consequently the lifting on the engaging pallet is performed on +a shorter lever arm than on the disengaging pallet, also any inequality +in workmanship would prove more detrimental on the engaging than on the +disengaging pallet. The equidistant pallet requires fine workmanship +throughout. We have purposely shown it of a width of 10deg., which is the +widest we can employ in a 15 tooth wheel, and shows the defects of this +escapement more readily than if we had used a narrow pallet. A narrower +pallet is advisable, as the difference in the discharging edges will be +less, and the lifting arms would, therefore, not show so much difference +in leverage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +The circular pallet is sometimes appropriately called "the pallet with +equal lifts," as the lever arms AMO and ANP, Fig. 3, are equal lengths. +It will be noticed by examining the diagram, that the pallets are +bisected by the 30deg. lines EB and FB, one-half their width being placed +on each side of these lines. In this pallet we have two locking circles, +MP for the engaging pallet, and NO for the disengaging pallet. The weak +points in this escapement are that the unlocking resistance is greater +on the engaging than on the disengaging pallet, and that neither of them +lock on the tangents AC and AD, at the points of intersection with EB +and FB. The narrower the circular pallet is made, the nearer to the +tangent will the unlocking be performed. In neither the equidistant or +circular pallets can the unlocking resistance be _exactly_ the same on +each pallet, as in the engaging pallet the friction takes place before +AB, the line of centers, which is more severe than when this line has +been passed, as is the case with the disengaging pallet; this fact +proportionately increases the existing defects of the circular over the +equidistant pallet, and _vice versa_, but for the same reason, the +lifting in the equidistant is proportionately accompanied by more +friction than in the circular. + +Both equidistant and circular pallets have their adherents; the finest +Swiss, French and German watches are made with equidistant escapements, +while the majority of English and American watches contain the circular. +In our opinion the English are wise in adhering to the circular form. We +think a ratchet wheel should not be employed with equidistant pallets. +By examining Fig. 2, we see an English pallet of this form. We have +shown its defects in such a wide pallet as the English (as we have +before stated), because they are more readily perceived; also, on +account of the shape of the teeth, there is danger of the discharging +edge, P, dipping so deep into the wheel, as to make considerable drop +necessary, or the pallets would touch on the backs of the teeth. In the +case of the club tooth, the latter is hollowed out, therefore, less drop +is required. We have noticed that theoretically, it is advantageous to +make the pallets narrower than the English, both for the equidistant and +circular escapements. There is an escapement, Fig. 4, which is just the +opposite to the English. The entire lift is performed by the wheel, +while in the case of the ratchet wheel, the entire lifting angle is on +the pallets; also, the pallets being as narrow as they can be made, +consistent with strength, it has the good points of both the equidistant +and circular pallets, as the unlocking can be performed on the tangent +and the lifting arms are of equal length. The wheel, however, is so much +heavier as to considerably increase the inertia; also, we have a metal +surface of quite an extent sliding over a thin jewel. For practical +reasons, therefore, it has been slightly altered in form and is only +used in cheap work, being easily made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +We will now consider the drop, which is a clear loss of power, and, if +excessive, is the cause of much irregularity. It should be as small as +possible consistent with perfect freedom of action. + +In so far as _angular_ measurements are concerned, no hard and fast rule +can be applied to it, the larger the escape wheel the smaller should be +the angle allowed for drop. Authorities on the subject allow 1 1/2deg. drop +for the club and 2deg. for the ratchet tooth. It is a fact that escape +wheels are not cut perfectly true; the teeth are apt to bend slightly +from the action of the cutters. The truest wheel can be made of steel, +as each tooth can be successively ground after being hardened and +tempered. Such a wheel would require less drop than one of any other +metal. Supposing we have a wheel with a primitive diameter of 7.5 mm., +what is the amount of drop, allowing 1 1/2deg. by angular measurement? +7.5 x 3.1416 / 360 x 1.5 = .0983 mm., which is sufficient; a hair could +get between the pallet and tooth, and would not stop the watch. Even +after allowing for imperfectly divided teeth, we require no greater +freedom even if the wheel is larger. Now suppose we take a wheel +with a primitive diameter of 8.5 mm. and find the amount of drop; +8.5 x 3.1416 / 360 x 1.5 = .1413 mm., or .1413 - .0983 = .043 mm., +more drop than the smaller wheel, if we take the same angle. This is a +waste of force. The angular drop should, therefore, be proportioned +according to the size of the wheel. We wish it to be understood that +common sense must always be our guide. When the horological student once +arrives at this standpoint, he can _intelligently_ apply himself to his +calling. + +_The Draw._--The draw or draft angle was added to the pallets in order +to draw the fork back against the bankings and the guard point from the +roller whenever the safety action had performed its function. + +[Illustration: Fig. 5.] + +Pallets with draw are more difficult to unlock than those without it, +this is in the nature of a fault, but whenever there are two faults we +must choose the less. The rate of the watch will suffer less on account +of the recoil introduced than it would were the locking faces arcs of +circles struck from the pallet center, in which case the guard point +would often remain against the roller. The draw should be as light as +possible consistent with safety of action; some writers allow 15deg. on the +engaging and 12deg. on the disengaging pallet; others again allow 12deg. on +each, which we deem sufficient. The draw is measured from the locking +edges M and N, Fig. 5. The locking planes _when locked_ are inclined 12deg. +from EB, and FB. In the case of the engaging pallet it inclines toward +the center A. The draw is produced on account of MA being longer than +RA, consequently, when power is applied to the scape tooth S, the pallet +is drawn into the wheel. The disengaging pallet inclines in the same +direction but away from the center A; the reason is obvious from the +former explanation. Some people imagine that the greater the incline on +the locking edge of the escape teeth, the stronger the draw would be. +This is not the case, but it is certainly necessary that the point of +the tooth alone should touch the pallet. From this it follows that the +angle on the teeth must be greater than on the pallets; examine the +disengaging pallet in Fig. 5, as it is from this pallet that the +inclination of the teeth must be determined, as in the case of the +engaging pallet the motion is toward the line of centers AB, and +therefore _away_ from the tooth, which partially explains why some +people advocate 15deg. draw for this pallet. As illustrated in the case of +the disengaging pallet, however, the motion is also towards the line of +centers AB, and _towards_ the tooth as well, all of which will be seen +by the dotted circles MM2 and NN2, representing the paths of the +pallets. It will be noticed that UNF and BNB are opposite and equal +angles of 12deg. For practical reasons, from a manufacturing standpoint, +the angle on the tooth is made just twice the amount, namely 24deg.; we +could make it a little less or a little more. If we made it less than +20deg. too great a surface would be in contact with the jewel, involving +greater friction in unlocking and an inefficient draw, but in the case +of an English lever with such an arrangement we could do with less +drop, which advantage would be too dearly bought; or if the angle is +made over 28deg., the point or locking edge of the tooth would rapidly +become worn in case of a brass wheel. Also in an English lever more drop +would be required. + +_The Lock._--What we have said in regard to drop also applies to the +lock, which should be as small as possible, consistent with perfect +safety. The greater the drop the deeper must be the lock; 1 1/2deg. is the +angle generally allowed for the lock, but it is obvious that in a large +escapement it can be less. + +[Illustration: Fig. 6.] + +_The Run._--The run or, as it is sometimes called, "the slide," should +also be as light as possible; from 1/4deg. to 1/2deg. is sufficient. It +follows then, the bankings should be as close together as possible, +consistent with requisite freedom for escaping. Anything more than this +increases the angular connection of the balance with the escapement, +which directly violates the theory under which it is constructed; also, +a greater amount of work will be imposed upon the balance to meet the +increased unlocking resistance, resulting in a poor motion and accurate +time will be out of the question. It will be seen that those workmen who +make a practice of opening the banks, "to give the escapement more +freedom" simply jump from the frying pan into the fire. The bankings +should be as far removed from the pallet center as possible, as the +further away they are pitched the less run we require, according to +angular measurement. Figure 6 illustrates this fact; the tooth S has +just dropped on the engaging pallet, but the fork has not yet reached +the bankings. At _a_ we have 1deg. of run, while if placed at _b_ we +would only have 1/2deg. of run, but still the same freedom for escaping, +and less unlocking resistance. + +The bankings should be placed towards the acting end of the fork as +illustrated, as in case the watch "rebanks" there would be more strain +on the lever pivots if they were placed at the other end of the fork. + +[Illustration: Fig. 7.] + +_The Lift._--The lift is composed of the actual lift on the teeth and +pallets and the lock and run. We will suppose that from drop to drop we +allow 10deg.; if the lock is 1 1/2deg. then the actual lift by means of the +inclined planes on teeth and pallets will be 8 1/2deg. We have seen that a +small lifting angle is advisable, so that the vibrations of the balance +will be as free as possible. There are other reasons as well. Fig. 7 +shows two inclined planes; we desire to lift the weight 2 a distance +equal to the angle at which the planes are inclined; it will be seen at +a glance that we will have less friction by employing the smaller +incline, whereas with the larger one the motive power is employed +through a greater distance on the object to be moved. The smaller the +angle the more energetic will the movement be; the grinding of the +angles and fit of the pivots, etc., also increases in importance. An +actual lift of 8 1/2deg. satisfies the conditions imposed very well. We +have before seen that both on account of the unlocking and the lifting +leverage of the pallet arms, it would be advisable to make them narrow +both in the equidistant and circular escapement. We will now study the +question from the standpoint of the lift, in so far as the wheel is +concerned. + +[Illustration: Fig. 8.] + +It is self-evident that a narrow pallet requires a wide tooth, and a +wide pallet a narrow or thin tooth wheel; in the ratchet wheel we have a +metal point passing over a jeweled plane. The friction is at its +minimum, because there is less adhesion than with the club tooth, but we +must emphasize the fact that we require a greater angle in proportion on +the pallets in this escapement than with the narrow pallets and wider +tooth. This seems to be a point which many do not thoroughly comprehend, +and we would advise a close study of Fig. 8, which will make it +perfectly clear, as we show both a wide and a narrow pallet. GH, +represents the primitive, which in this figure is also the real diameter +of the escape wheel. In measuring the lifting angles for the pallets, +our starting point is _always_ from the tangents AC and AD. The tangents +are straight lines, but the wheel describes the circle GH, therefore +they must deviate from one another, and the closer to the center A the +discharging edge of the engaging pallet reaches, the greater does this +difference become; and in the same manner the further the discharging +edge of the disengaging pallet is from the center A the greater it is. +This shows that the loss is greater in the equidistant than in the +circular escapement. After this we will designate this difference as +the "loss." In order to illustrate it more plainly we show the widest +pallet--the English--in equidistant form. This gives another reason why +the English lever should only be made with circular pallets, as we have +seen that the wider the pallet the greater the loss. The loss is +measured at the intersection of the path of the discharging edge OO, +with the circle G H, and is shown through AC2, which intersects these +circles at that point. In the case of the disengaging pallet, PP +illustrates the path of the discharging edge; the loss is measured as in +the preceding case where GH is intersected as shown by AD2. It amounts +to a different value on each pallet. Notice the loss between C and C2, +on the engaging, and D and D2 on the disengaging pallet; it is greater +on the engaging pallet, so much so that it amounts to 2deg., which is +equal to the entire lock; therefore if 8 1/2deg. of work is to be +accomplished through this pallet, the lifting plane requires an angle of +10 1/2deg. struck from AC. + +Let us now consider the lifting action of the club tooth wheel. This is +decidedly a complicated action, and requires some study to comprehend. +In action with the engaging pallet the wheel moves _up_, or in the +direction of the motion of the pallets, but on the disengaging pallet it +moves _down_, and in a direction opposite to the pallets, and the heel +of the tooth moves with greater velocity than the locking edge; also in +the case of the engaging pallet, the locking edge moves with greater +velocity than the discharging edge; in the disengaging pallet the +opposite is the case, as the discharging edge moves with greater +velocity than the locking. These points involve factors which must be +considered, and the drafting of a correct action is of paramount +importance; we therefore show the lift as it is accomplished in four +different stages in a good action. Fig. 9 illustrates the engaging, and +Fig. 10 the disengaging pallet; by comparing the figures it will be +noticed that the lift takes place on the point of the tooth similar to +the English, until the discharging edge of the pallet has been passed, +when the heel gradually comes into play on the engaging, but more +quickly on the disengaging pallet. + +We will also notice that during the first part of the lift the tooth +moves faster along the engaging lifting plane than on the disengaging; +on pallets 2 and 3 this difference is quite large; towards the latter +part of the lift the action becomes quicker on the disengaging pallet +and slower on the engaging. + +To obviate this difficulty some fine watches, notably those of A. Lange +& Sons, have convex lifting planes on the engaging and concave on the +disengaging pallets; the lifting planes on the teeth are also curved. +See Fig. 11. This is decidedly an ingenious arrangement, and is in +strict accordance with scientific investigation. We should see many fine +watches made with such escapements if the means for producing them could +fully satisfy the requirements of the scientific principles involved. + +[Illustration: Fig. 9.] + +The distribution of the lift on tooth and pallet is a very important +matter; the lifting angle on the tooth must be _less_ in proportion to +its width than it is on the pallet. For the sake of making it perfectly +plain, we illustrate what should not be made; if we have 10 1/2deg. for +width of tooth and pallet, and take half of it for a tooth, and the +other half for the pallet, making each of them 5 1/4deg. in width, and +suppose we have a lifting of 8 1/2deg. to distribute between them, by +allowing 4 1/4deg. on each, the lift would take place as shown in +Fig. 12, which is a very unfavorable action. The edge of the engaging +pallet scrapes on the lifting plane of the tooth, yet it is astonishing +to find some otherwise very fine watches being manufactured right along +which contain this fault; such watches can be stopped with the ruby pin +in the fork and the engaging pallet in action, nor would they start when +run down as soon as the crown is touched, no matter how well they were +finished and fitted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 10.] + +The lever lengths of the club tooth are variable, while with the ratchet +they are constant, which is in its favor; in the latter it would always +be as SB, Fig. 13. This is a shorter lever than QB, consequently more +powerful, although the greater velocity is at Q, which only comes into +action after the inertia of wheel and pallets has been overcome, and +when the greatest momentum during contact is reached. SB is the +primitive radius of the club tooth wheel, but both primitive and _real_ +radius of the ratchet wheel. The distance of centers of wheel and pallet +will be alike in both cases; also the lockings will be the same distance +apart on both pallets; therefore, when horologists, even if they have +worldwide reputations, claim that the club tooth has an advantage over +the ratchet because it begins the lift with a shorter lever than the +latter, it does not make it so. We are treating the subject from a +purely horological standpoint, and neither patriotism or prejudice has +anything to do with it. We wish to sift the matter thoroughly and arrive +at a just conception of the merits and defects of each form of +escapement, and show _reasons_ for our conclusions. + +[Illustration: Fig. 11.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 12.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 13.] + +Anyone who has closely followed our deductions must see that in so far +as the wheel is concerned the ratchet or English wheel has several +points in its favor. Such a wheel is inseparable from a wide pallet; but +we have seen that a narrower pallet is advisable; also as little drop +and lock as possible; clearly, we must effect a compromise. In other +words, so far the balance of our reasoning is in favor of the club tooth +escapement and to effect an intelligent division of angles for tooth, +pallet and lift is one of the great questions which confronts the +intelligent horologist. + +Anyone who has ever taken the pains to draw pallet and tooth with +different angles, through every stage of the lift, with both wide and +narrow pallets and teeth, in circular and equidistant escapements, will +have received an eye-opener. We strongly advise all our readers who are +practical workmen to try it after studying what we have said. We are +certain it will repay them. + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.] + +_The Center Distance of Wheel and Pallets._ The direction of pressure of +the wheel teeth should be through the pallet center by drawing the +tangents AC and AD, Fig. 2 to the primitive circle GH, at the +intersection of the angle FBE. This condition is realized in the +equidistant pallet. In the circular pallet, Fig. 3, this condition +cannot exist, as in order _to lock_ on a tangent the center distance +should be _greater_ for the engaging and _less_ for the disengaging +pallet, therefore watchmakers aim to go between the two and plant them +as before specified at A. + +When planted on the tangents the unlocking resistance will be less and +the impulse transmitted under favorable conditions, especially so in +the circular, as the direction of pressure coincides (close to the +center of the lift), with the law of the parallelogram of forces. + +It is _impossible_ to plant pallets on the tangents in very small +escapements, as there would not be enough room for a pallet arbor of +proper strength, nor will they be found planted on the tangents in the +medium size escapement with a long pallet arbor, nor in such a one with +a very wide tooth (see Fig. 4) as the heel would come so close to the +center A, that the solidity of pallets and arbor would suffer. We will +give an actual example. For a medium sized escape wheel with a primitive +diameter of 7.5 mm., the center distance AB is 4.33 mm. By using 3deg. of a +lifting angle on the teeth, the distance from the heel of the tooth to +the pallet center will be .4691 mm.; by allowing .1 mm. between wheel +and pallet and .15 mm. for stock on the pallets we find we will have a +pallet arbor as follows: .4691 - (.1 + .15) x 2 = .4382 mm. It would not +be practicable to make anything smaller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3.] + +It behooves us now to see that while a narrow pallet is advisable a very +wide tooth is not; yet these two are inseparable. Here is another case +for a compromise, as, unquestionably the pallets ought to be planted on +the tangents. There is no difficulty about it in the English lever, and +we have shown in our example that a judiciously planned club tooth +escapement of medium size can be made with the center distance properly +planted. + +[Illustration: Fig. 4.] + +When considering the center distance we must of necessity consider the +widths of teeth and pallets and their lifting angles. We are now at a +point in which no watchmaker of intelligence would indicate one certain +division for these parts and claim it to be "the best." It is always +those who do not thoroughly understand a subject who are the first to +make such claims. We will, however, give our opinion within certain +limits. The angle to be divided for tooth and pallet is 10 1/2deg. Let us +divide it by 2, which would be the most natural thing to do, and examine +the problem. We will have 5 1/4deg. each for width of tooth and pallet. We +_must_ have a smaller lifting angle on the tooth than on the pallet, but +the wider the tooth the greater should its lifting angle be. It would +not be mechanical to make the tooth wide and the lifting angle small, as +the lifting plane on the pallets would be too steep on account of being +narrow. A lifting angle on the tooth which would be _exactly_ suitable +for a given circular, would be _too great_ for a given equidistant +pallet. It follows, therefore, taking 5 1/4deg. as a width for the +tooth, that while we could employ it in a fair sized escapement with +equidistant pallets, we could not do so with circular pallets and still +have the latter pitched on the tangents. We see the majority of +escapements made with narrower teeth than pallets, and for a very good +reason. + +In the example previously given, the 3deg. lift on the tooth is well +adapted for a width of 4 1/2deg., which would require a pallet 6deg. in +width. The tooth, therefore, would be 3/4 the width of pallets, which is +very good indeed. + +From what we have said it follows that a large number of pallets are not +planted on the tangents at all. We have never noticed this question in +print before. Writers generally seem to, in fact do, assume that no +matter how large or small the escapement may be, or how the pallets and +teeth are divided for width and lifting angle, no difficulty will be +found in locating the pallets on the tangents. Theoretically there is no +difficulty, but in practice we find there is. + +_Equidistant vs. Circular._ At this stage we are able to weigh the +circular against the equidistant pallet. In beginning this essay we had +to explain the difference between them, so the reader could follow our +discussion, and not until now, are we able to sum up our conclusions. + +The reader will have noticed that for such an important action as the +lift, which supplies power to the balance, the circular pallet is +favored from every point of view. This is a very strong point in its +favor. On the other hand, the unlocking resistance being less, and as +nearly alike as possible on both pallets in the equidistant, it is a +question if the total vibration of the balance will be greater with the +one than the other, although it will receive the impulse under better +conditions from the circular pallet; but it expends more force in +unlocking it. Escapement friction plays an important role in the +position and isochronal adjustments; the greater the friction +encountered the slower the vibration of the balance. The friction should +be constant. In unlocking, the equidistant comes nearer to fulfilling +this condition, while during the lift it is more nearly so in the +circular. The friction in unlocking, from a timing standpoint, +overshadows that of the impulse, and the tooth can be a little wider in +the equidistant than the circular escapement with the pallet properly +planted. Therefore for the _finest_ watches the equidistant escapement +is well adapted, but for anything less than that the circular should be +our choice. + +_The Fork and Roller Action._ While the lifting action of the lever +escapement corresponds to that of the cylinder, the fork and roller +action corresponds to the impulse action in the chronometer and duplex +escapements. + +Our experience leads us to believe that the action now under +consideration is but imperfectly understood by many workmen. It is a +complicated action, and when out of order is the cause of many annoying +stoppages, often characterized by the watch starting when taken from the +pocket. + +The action is very important and is generally divided into impulse and +safety action, although we think we ought to divide it into three, +namely, by adding that of the unlocking action. We will first of all +consider the impulse and unlocking actions, because we cannot +intelligently consider the one without the other, as the ruby pin and +the slot in the fork are utilized in each. The ruby pin, or strictly +speaking, the "impulse radius," is a lever arm, whose length is measured +from the center of the balance staff to the face of the ruby pin, and is +used, firstly, as a power or transmitting lever on the acting or +geometrical length of the fork (_i. e._, from the pallet center to the +beginning of the horn), and which at the moment is a resistance lever, +to be utilized in unlocking the pallets. After the pallets are unlocked +the conditions are reversed, and we now find the lever fork, through the +pallets, transmitting power to the balance by means of the impulse +radius. In the first part of the action we have a short lever engaging a +longer one, which is an advantage. See Fig. 14, where we have purposely +somewhat exaggerated the conditions. A'X represents the impulse radius +at present under discussion, and AW the acting length of the fork. It +will be seen that the shorter the impulse radius, or in other words, the +closer the ruby pin is to the balance staff and the longer the fork, the +easier will the unlocking of the pallets be performed, but this entails +a great impulse angle, for the law applicable to the case is, that the +angles are in the inverse ratio to the radii. In other words, the +shorter the radius, the greater is the angle, and the smaller the angle +the greater is the radius. We know, though, that we must have as small +an impulse angle as possible in order that the balance should be highly +detached. Here is one point in favor of a short impulse radius, and one +against it. Now, let us turn to the impulse action. Here we have the +long lever AW acting on a short one, A'X, which is a disadvantage. Here, +then, we ought to try and have a short lever acting on a long one, which +would point to a short fork and a great impulse radius. Suppose AP, +Fig. 14, is the length of fork, and A'P is the impulse radius; here, +then, we favor the impulse, and it is directly in accordance with the +theory of the free vibration of the balance, for, as before stated, the +longer the radius the smaller the angle. The action at P is also closer +to the line of centers than it is at W, which is another advantage. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +We will notice that by employing a large impulse angle, and consequently +a short radius, the intersection _m_ of the two circles _ii_ and _cc_ is +very _safe_, whereas, with the conditions reversed in favor of the +impulse action, the intersection at _k_ is more delicate. We have now +seen enough to appreciate the fact that we favor one action at the +expense of another. + +By having a lifting angle on pallet and tooth of 8 1/2deg., a locking +angle of 1 1/2deg., and a run of 1/2deg., we will have an angular +movement of the fork of 8 1/2 + 1 1/2 + 1/2 = 10 1/2deg. + +[Illustration: Fig. 15.] + +Writers generally only consider the movement of the fork from drop to +drop on the pallets, but we will be thoroughly practical in the matter. +With a total motion of the fork of 10 1/2deg. (JAW, Fig. 15), one-half, +or 5 1/4deg. will be performed on each side of the line of centers. We +are at liberty to choose any impulse angle which we may prefer; 3 to 1 +is a good proportion for an ordinary well-made watch. By employing it, +the angle XA'Y would be equal to 31 1/2deg. The radius A'X Fig. 16, is +also of the same proportion, but the angle AA'X is greater because the +fork angle WAA' is greater than the same angle in Fig. 15. We will +notice that the intersection _k_ is much smaller in Fig. 15 than in +Fig. 16. The action in the latter begins much further from the line of +centers than in the former and outlines an action which should not be +made. + +[Illustration: Fig. 16.] + +To come back to the impulse angle, some might use a proportion of 3.5, 4 +or even 5 to 1, while others for the finest of watches would only use +2.75 to 1. By having a total vibration of the balance of 1 1/2 turns, which +is equal to 540deg. a fork angle of 10deg. and a proportion of 2.75 for the +impulse angle which would be equal to 10 x 2.75 = 27.5deg. The _free_ +vibration of the balance, or as this is called, "the supplemental arc," +is equal to 540deg. - 27.5deg. = 512.50deg., while with a proportion of +5 to 1, making an impulse angle of 50deg., it would be equal to 490deg. +To sum up, the finer the watch the lower the proportion, the closer the +action to the line of centers, the smaller the friction. On account of +leverage the more difficult the unlocking but the more energetic the +impulse when it does occur. The velocity of the ruby pin at P; Fig. 14, +is much greater than at W, consequently it will not be overtaken as soon +by the fork as at W. The velocity of the fork at the latter point is +greater than at P; the intersection of _ii_ and _cc_ is also not as +great; therefore the lower the proportion the finer and more exact must +the workmanship be. + +We will notice that the unlocking action has been overruled by the +impulse. The only point so far in which the former has been favored is +in the diminished action before the line of centers, as previously +pointed out at P, Fig. 14. + +We will now consider the width of the ruby pin and to get a good insight +into the question, we will study Fig. 17. A is the pallet center, A' the +balance center, the line AA' being the line of centers; the angle WAA +equals half the total motion of the fork, the other half, of course, +taking place on the opposite side of the center line. WA is the _center_ +of the fork when it rests against the bank. The angle AA'X represents +half the impulse angle; the other half, the same as with the fork, is +struck on the other side of the center line. At the point of +intersection of these angles we will draw _cc_ from the pallet center A, +which equals the acting length of the fork, and from the balance center +we will draw _ii_, which equals the _theoretical_ impulse radius; some +writers use it as the _real_ radius. The wider the ruby pin the greater +will the latter be, which we will explain presently. + +The ruby pin in entering the fork must have a certain amount of freedom +for action, from 1 to 1 1/4deg. Should the watch receive a jar at the +moment the guard point enters the crescent or passing hollow in the +roller, the fork would fly against the ruby pin. It is important that +the angular freedom between the fork and ruby pin at the moment it +enters into the slot be _less_ than the total locking angle on the +pallets. If we employ a locking angle of 1 1/2deg. and 1/2deg. run, we +would have a total lock on the pallets of 2deg. By allowing 1 1/4deg. +of freedom for the ruby pin at the moment the guard point enters the +crescent, in case the fork should strike the face of the ruby pin, the +pallets will still be locked 3/4deg. and the fork drawn back against the +bankings through the draft angle. + +We will see what this shake amounts to for a given acting length of +fork, which describes an arc of a circle, therefore the acting length is +only the radius of that circle and must be multiplied by two in order to +get the diameter. The acting length of fork = 4.5 mm., what is the +amount of shake when the ruby pin passes the acting corner? +4.5 x 2 x 3.1416 / 360deg. = .0785 x 1.25 = .0992 mm. The shake of the ruby +pin in the slot of the fork must be as slight as possible, consistent +with perfect freedom of action. It varies from 1/4deg. to 1/2deg., +according to length of fork and shape of ruby pin. A square ruby pin +requires more shake than any other kind; it enters the fork and receives +the impulse in a diagonal direction on the jewel, in which position it +is illustrated at Z, Fig. 20. This ruby pin acts on a knife edge, but +for all that the engaging friction during the unlocking action is +considerable. + +Our reasoning tells us it matters not if a ruby pin be wide or narrow, +it must have _the same_ freedom in passing the acting edge of the fork, +therefore, to have the impulse radius on the point of intersection of +A'X with AW, Fig. 17, we would require a _very_ narrow ruby pin. With +1deg. of freedom at the edge, and 1/2deg. in the slot, we could only +have a ruby pin of a width of 1 1/2deg. Applying it to the preceding +example it would only have an actual width of .0785 x 1.5 = .1178 mm., +or the size of an ordinary balance pivot. At _n_, Fig. 17, we illustrate +such a ruby pin; the theoretical and real impulse radius coincide with +one another. The intersection of the circle _ii_ and _cc_ is very +slight, while the friction in unlocking begins within 1deg. of half the +total movement of the fork from the line of centers; to illustrate, if +the angular motion is 11deg. the ruby pin under discussion will begin +action 4 1/2deg. before the line of centers, being an engaging, or +"uphill" friction of considerable magnitude. + +[Illustration: Fig. 17.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 18.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 19.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 20.] + +The intersection with the fork is also much less than with the wider +ruby pin, making the impulse action very delicate. On the other hand the +widest ruby pin for which there is any occasion is one beginning the +unlocking action on the line of centers, Fig. 17; this entails a width +of slot equal to the angular motion of the fork. We see here the +advantage of a wide ruby pin over a narrow one in the unlocking action. +Let us now examine the question from the standpoint of the impulse +action. + +Fig. 18 illustrates the moment the impulse is transmitted; the fork has +been moved in the direction of the arrow by the ruby pin; the escapement +has been unlocked and the opposite side of the slot has just struck the +ruby pin. The exact position in which the impulse is transmitted varies +with the locking angle, the width of ruby pin, its shake in the slot, +the length of fork, its weight, and the velocity of the ruby pin, which +is determined by the vibrations of the balance and the impulse radius. + +In an escapement with a total lock of 1 3/4deg. and 1 1/4 of shake in +the slot, theoretically, the impulse would be transmitted 2deg. from the +bankings. The narrow ruby pin n receives the impulse on the line _v_, +which is closer to the line of centers than the line _u_, on which the +large ruby pin receives the impulse. Here then we have an advantage of +the narrow ruby pin over a wide one; with a wider ruby pin the balance +is also more liable to rebank when it takes a long vibration. Also on +account of the greater angle at which the ruby pin stands to the slot +when the impulse takes place, the _drop_ of the fork against the jewel +will amount to more than its shake in the slot (which is measured when +standing on the line of centers). On this account some watches have +slots dovetailed in form, being wider at the bottom, others have ruby +pins of this form. They require very exact execution; we think we can do +without them by judiciously selecting a width of ruby pin between the +two extremes. We would choose a ruby pin of a width equal to half the +angular motion of the fork. There is an ingenious arrangement of fork +and roller which aims to, and partially does, overcome the difficulty of +choosing between a wide and narrow ruby pin, it is known as the Savage +pin roller escapement. We intend to describe it later. + +If the face of the ruby pin were planted on the theoretical impulse +radius _ii_, Fig. 19, the impulse would end in a butting action as +shown; hence the great importance of distinguishing between the +theoretical and real impulse radius and establishing a reliable data +from which to work. We feel that these actions have never been properly +and thoroughly treated in simple language; we have tried to make them +plain so that anyone can comprehend them with a little study. + +Three good forms of ruby pins are the triangular, the oval and the flat +faced; for ordinary work the latter is as good as any, but for fine work +the triangular pin with the corners slightly rounded off is preferable. + +[Illustration: Fig. 21.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 23.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 22.] + +English watches are met with having a cylindrical or round ruby pin. +Such a pin should never be put into a watch. The law of the +parallelogram of forces is completely ignored by using such a pin; the +friction during the unlocking and impulse actions is too severe, as it +is, without the addition of so unmechanical an arrangement. Fig. 21 +illustrates the action of a round ruby pin; _ii_ is the path of the ruby +pin; _cc_ that of the acting length of the fork. It is shown at the +moment the impulse is transmitted. It will be seen that the impact takes +place _below_ the center of the ruby pin, whereas it should take place +at the center, as the motion of the fork is _upwards_ and that of the +ruby pin _downwards_ until the line of the centers has been reached. +The same rule applies to the flat-faced pin and it is important that the +right quantity be ground off. We find that 3/7 is approximately the +amount which should be ground away. Fig. 22 illustrates the fork +standing against the bank. The ruby pin touches the side of the slot but +has not as yet begun to act; _ri_ is the real impulse circle for which +we allow 1 1/4deg. of freedom at the acting edge of the fork; the face +of the ruby pin is therefore on this line. The next thing to do is to +find the center of the pin. From the side _n_ of the slot we construct +the right angle _o n t_; from _n_, we transmit 1/2 the width of the pin, +and plant the center _x_ on the line _n t_. We can have the center of +the pin slightly below this line, but in no case above it; but if we put +it below, the pin will be thinner and therefore more easily broken. + +[Illustration: Fig. 14.] + +_The Safety Action._ Although this action is separate from the impulse +and unlocking actions, it is still very closely connected with them, +much more so in the single than in the double roller escapement. If we +were to place the ruby pin at _X_, Fig. 14, we could have a much +smaller roller than by placing it at _P_. With the small roller the +safety action is more secure, as the intersection at _m_ is greater than +at _k_. It is not as liable to "butt" and the friction is less when the +guard point is thrown against the small roller. Suppose we take two +rollers, one with a diameter of 2.5 mm., the other just twice this +amount, of 5 mm. By having the guard radius and pressure the same in +each case, if the guard point touched the larger roller it would not +only have twice, but four times more effect than on the smaller one. We +will notice that the smaller the impulse angle the larger the roller, +because the ruby pin is necessarily placed farther from the center. The +position of the ruby pin should, therefore, govern the size of the +roller, which should be as small as possible. There should only be +enough metal left between the circumference of the roller and the face +of the jewel to allow for a crescent or passing hollow of sufficient +depth and an efficient setting for the jewel. For this reason, as well +as securing the correct impulse radius and therefore angle, when +replacing the ruby pin, and having it set securely and mechanically in +the roller, it is necessary that the pin and the hole in the roller be +of the same form, and a good fit. Fig. 23 illustrates the difference in +size of rollers. In the smaller one the conditions imposed are +satisfied, while in the larger one they are not. In the single roller +the safety action is at the mercy of the impulse and pallet angles. We +have noticed that in order to favor the impulse we require a large +roller, and for the safety action a small one, therefore escapements +made on fine principles are supplied with two rollers, one for each +action. + +It may be well to say that in our opinion a proportion between the fork +and impulse angles in 10deg. pallets of 3 or 3 1/2 to 1, _depending_ +upon the size of the escapement, is the lowest which should be made in +single roller. We have seen them in proportions of 2 to 1 in single +roller--a scientific principle foolishly applied--resulting in an action +entirely unsatisfactory. + +When the guard point is pressed against the roller the escape tooth +must still rest on the locking face of the pallet; if the total lock +is 2deg., by allowing 1 1/4deg. freedom for the guard point between +the bank and the roller the escapement will still be locked 3/4deg. +How much this shake actually amounts to depends upon the guard +radius. Suppose this to be 4 mm., then the freedom would equal +4 x 2 x 3.1416 / 360 x 1.25 = .0873 mm. + +[Illustration: Fig. 24.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 25.] + +_The Crescent_ in the roller must be large and deep enough so it will be +impossible for the guard point to touch in or on the corners of it; at +the same time it must not be too large, as it would necessitate a longer +horn on the fork than is necessary. + +Fig. 24 shows the slot _n_ of the fork standing at the bank. The ruby +pin _o_ touches it, but has not as yet acted on it; _s s_ illustrates a +single roller, while S2 illustrates the safety roller for a double +roller escapement. In order to find the dimensions of the crescent in +the single roller we must proceed as follows: WA is in the center of the +fork when it rests against the bank, and is, therefore, one of the sides +of the fork angle, and is drawn from the pallet center; V A W is an +angle of 1 1/4deg., which equals the freedom between the guard point and +the roller; _g g_ represents the path of the guard pin _u_ for the +single roller, and is drawn at the intersection of VA with the roller A' +A2 is a line drawn from the balance center through that of the ruby pin, +and therefore also passes through the center of the crescent. By +planting a compass on this line, where it cuts the periphery of the +roller, and locating the point of intersection of VA with the roller, +will give us one-half the crescent, the remaining half being transferred +to the opposite side of the line A' A2. We will notice that the guard +point has entered the crescent 1 1/4deg. before the fork begins to move. + +The angle of opening for the crescent in the double roller escapement is +greater than in the single, because it is placed closer to the balance +center, and the guard point or dart further from the pallet center, +causing a greater intersection; also the velocity of the guard point has +increased, while that of the safety roller has decreased. Fig. 24, at +_ff_, shows the path of the dart _h_, which also has 1 1/4deg. freedom +between bank and roller. From the balance center we draw A' _d_ touching +the center or point of the dart; from this point we construct at 5deg. +angle _b_ A' _d_. This is to ensure sufficient freedom for the dart when +entering the crescent. We plant a compass on the point of intersection +of A' A2 with the safety roller, S2, and locating the point where A'_b_ +intersects it, have found one-half the opening for the crescent, the +remaining half being constructed on the opposite side of the line A' A2. + +_The Horn_ on the fork belongs to the safety action: more horn is +required with the double than with the single roller, on account of the +greater angle of opening for the crescent. + +The horn should be of such a length that when the crescent has passed +the guard point, the end of the horn should point to at least the center +of the ruby pin. + +The dotted circle, _s s_, Fig. 25, represents a single roller. It will +be noticed that the corner of the crescent has passed the guard pin _u_ +by a considerable angle, and although this is so, in case of an accident +the _acting edge_ of the fork would come in contact with the ruby pin; +this proves that a well made single roller escapement really requires +but little horn, only enough to ensure the safe entry of the ruby pin in +case the guard point at that moment be thrown against the roller. We +will now examine the question from the standpoint of the double roller; +S2, Fig. 25, is the safety roller; the corner of the crescent has safely +passed the dart _h_; the centers of the ruby pin _o_ and of the crescent +being on the line A' A2, we plant the compass on the pallet center and +the center of the face of the ruby pin and draw _k k_, which will be the +path described by the horn. The end of the horn is therefore planted +upon it from 1 1/2deg. to 1 3/4deg. from the ruby pin; this freedom at +the end of the horn is therefore from 1/4deg. to 1/2deg. more than we +allow for the guard point; it depends upon the size of the escapement +and locking angles which we would choose. It must in any case be less +than the lock on the pallets, so that the fork will be drawn back +against the bank in case the horn be thrown against the ruby pin. + +When treating on the width of the ruby pin, we mentioned the Savage pin +roller escapement, which we illustrate in Figs. 26 and 27. This +ingenious arrangement was designed with the view of combining the +advantages of both wide and narrow pins and at the same time without any +of their disadvantages. + +In Fig. 26 we show the unlocking pins _u_ beginning their action on the +line of centers--the best possible point--in unlocking the escapement. +These pins were made of gold in all which we examined, although it is +recorded that wide ruby pins and ruby rollers have been used in this +escapement, which would be preferable. + +The functions of the two pins in the roller are simply to unlock the +escapement; the impulse is not transmitted to them as is the case in the +ordinary fork and roller action. In this action the guard pin _i_ also +acts as the impulse pin. We will notice that the passing hollow in this +roller is a rectangular slot the same as in the ordinary fork. When the +escapement is being unlocked the guard pin _i_ enters the hollow and +when the escape tooth comes into contact with the lifting plane of the +pallet the pin _i_, Fig. 27, transmits the impulse to the roller. + +[Illustration: Fig. 26.] + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +The impulse is transmitted closer to the line of centers than could be +done with any ruby pin. If the pin _i_ were wider the impulse would be +transmitted still closer to the line of centers, but the intersection of +it with the roller would be less. It is very delicate as it is, +therefore from a practical standpoint it ought to be made thin but +consistent with solidity. If the pin is anyway large, it should be +flattened on the sides, otherwise the friction would be similar to that +of the round ruby pin. It would also be preferable (on account of the +pin _i_ being very easily bent) to make the impulse piece narrow but of +such a length that it could be screwed to the fork, the same as the dart +in the double roller. The impulse radius is also the radius of the +roller, because the impulse is transmitted to the roller itself; for +this reason the latter is smaller in this action than in the ordinary +one having the same angles; also a shorter lever is in contact with a +longer one in the unlocking than in ordinary action of the same angles; +but for all this the pins _u u_ should be pitched close to the edge of +the roller, as the angular connection of the balance with the escapement +would be increased during the unlocking action. This escapement being +very delicate requires a 12deg. pallet angle and a proportion between +impulse and pallet angles of not less than 3 to 1, which would mean an +impulse angle of 36deg.; this, together with the first rate workmanship +required are two of the reasons why this action is not often met with. + +George Savage, of London, England, invented this action. He was a +watchmaker who, in the early part of this century, did much to perfect +the lever escapement by good work and nice proportion, besides inventing +the two pin variety. He spent the early part of his life in Clerkenwell, +but in his old days emigrated to Canada, and founded a flourishing +retail business in Montreal, where he died. Some of George Savage's +descendants are still engaged at the trade in Canada at the present day. + +The correct delineation of the lever escapement is a very important +matter. We illustrate one which is so delineated that it can be +practically produced. We have not noticed a draft of the lever +escapement, especially with equidistant pallets and club teeth, which +would act correctly in a watch. + +We have been aggressive in our work and have sometimes found theories +propounded and elongated which of themselves were not right; this may +have something to do with it, that we so often hear workmen say, "Theory +is no use, because if you work according to it your machine will not +run." We say, "No, sir, if your theory is not right in itself, then your +work will certainly not be correct; but if your theory be correct then +your work _must_ be correct. Why? it simply cannot be otherwise." We +will give it another name; let us say, apply sense, reason, thought, +experience and study to your work, and what have you done? You have +simply applied theory. + +A theorem is a proposition to be proved, not being able to prove it, we +must simply change it according as our experience dictates, this is +precisely what we have done with the escapement after having followed +the deductions of recognized authorities with the result that we can now +illustrate an escapement which has been thoroughly subjected to an +impartial analysis in every respect, and which is theoretically and +practically correct. + +We will not only give instructions for drafting the escapement now under +consideration, but will also make explanations how to draft it in +different positions, also in circular pallet and single roller. We are +convinced that by so doing we will do a service to many, we also wish to +avoid what we may call "the stereotyped" process, that is, one which may +be acquired by heart, but introduce any changes and perplexity is the +result. It is really not a difficult matter to draft escapements in +different positions, as an example will show. + +Before making a draft we must know exactly what we wish to produce. It +is well in drafting escapements to make them as large as possible, say +thirty to forty times larger than in the watch, in the present case the +size is immaterial, but we must have specifications for the proportions +of the angles. Our draft is to be the most difficult subject in lever +escapements; it is to be represented just as if it were working in a +watch; it is to represent a good and reliable action in every respect, +one which can be applied without special difficulty to a good watch, and +is to be "up to date" in every particular and to contain the majority +of the best points and conclusions reached in our analysis. + +_Specifications for Lever Escapement_: The pallets are to be +equidistant; the wheel teeth of the "club" form; there are to be two +rollers; wheel, pallet, and balance centers are to be in straight line. +The lock is to be 1 1/2deg., the run 1/4deg., making a total lock of +1 3/4deg.; the movement of pallets from drop to drop is to be 10deg., +while the fork is to move through 10 1/4deg. from bank to bank; the lift +on the wheel teeth is to be 3deg., while the remainder is to be the lift +on the pallets as follows: 10 1/4 - (1 3/4 + 3) = 5 1/2deg. for lift of +pallets. + +The wheel is to have 15 teeth, with pallets spanning 3 teeth or 2 1/2 +spaces, making the angle from lock to lock = 360 / 15 x 2 1/2 = 60deg., +the interval from tooth to tooth is 360 / 15 = 24deg.; divided by 2 +pallets = 24 / 2 = 12deg. for width of tooth, pallet and drop; drop is +to be 1 1/2deg., the tooth is to be 3/4 the width of the pallet, making +a tooth of a width of 4 1/2deg. and a pallet of 6deg. + +The draw is to be 12deg. on each pallet, while the locking faces of the +teeth are to incline 24deg. The acting length of fork is to be equal to +the distance of centers of scape wheel and pallets; the impulse angle +is to be 28deg.; freedom from dart and safety, roller is to be +1 1/4deg., and for dart and corner of crescent 5deg.; freedom for ruby +pin and acting edge of fork is to be 1 1/4deg.; width of slot is to be +1/2 the total motion, or 10 1/4 / 2 = 5 1/8deg.; shake of ruby pin in +slot = 1/4deg., leaving 5 1/8 - 1/4 = 4 7/8deg. for width of ruby pin. + +Radius of safety roller to be 4/7 of the theoretical impulse radius. The +length of horn is to be such that the end would point at least to the +center of the ruby pin when the edge of the crescent passes the dart; +space between the end of horn and ruby pin is to be 1 1/2deg. + +It is well to know that the angles for width of teeth, pallets and drop +are measured from the wheel center, while the lifting and locking angles +are struck from the pallet center, the draw from the locking corners of +the pallets, and the inclination of the teeth from the locking edge. + +In the fork and roller action, the angle of motion, the width of slot, +the ruby pin and its shake, the freedom between dart and roller, of ruby +pin with acting edge of fork and end of horn are all measured from the +pallet center, while the impulse angle and the crescent are measured +from the balance center. A sensible drawing board measures 17 x 24 +inches, we also require a set of good drawing instruments, the finer the +instruments the better; pay special attention to the compasses, pens and +protractor; add to this a straight ruler and set square. + +The best all-round drawing paper, both for India ink and colored work +has a rough surface; it must be fastened firmly and evenly to the board +by means of thumb tacks; the lines must be light and made with a hard +pencil. Use Higgins' India ink, which dries rapidly. + +[Illustration] + +We will begin by drawing the center line A' A B; use the point B for the +escape center; place the compass on it and strike G H, the primitive or +geometrical circle of the escape wheel; set the center of the protractor +at B and mark off an angle of 30deg. on each side of the line of centers; +this will give us the angles A B E and A B F together, forming the angle +F B E of 60deg., which represents from lock to lock of the pallets. Since +the chord of the angle of 60deg. is equal to the radius of the circle, this +gives us an easy means of verifying this angle by placing the compass at +the points of intersection of F B and E B with the primitive circle G H; +this distance must be equal to the radius of the circle. At these points +we will construct right angles to E B and F B, thus forming the tangents +C A and D A to the primitive circle G H. These tangents meet on the line +of centers at A, which will be the pallet center. Place the compass at A +and draw the locking circle M N at the points of intersection of E B and +F B with the primitive circle G H. The locking edges of the pallets will +always stand on this circle no matter in what relation the pallets +stand to the wheel. Place the center of the protractor at B and draw the +angle of width of pallets of 6deg.; I B E being for the engaging and J B F +for the disengaging pallet. In the equidistant pallet I B is drawn on +the side towards the center, while J B is drawn further from the center. +If we were drawing a circular pallet, one-half the width of pallets +would be placed on each side of E B and F B. At the points of +intersection of I B and J B with the primitive circle G H we draw the +path O for the discharging edge of the engaging and P for that of the +disengaging pallet. The total lock being 1 3/4deg., we construct V' A at +this angle from C A; the point of intersection of V' A with the locking +circle M N, is the position of the locking corner of the engaging +pallet. The pallet having 12deg. draw when locked we place the center of +the protractor on this corner and draw the angle Q M E. Q M will be the +locking face of the engaging pallet. If the face of the pallet were on +the line E B there would be no draw, and if placed to the opposite side +of E B the tooth would repel the pallet, forming what is known as the +repellant escapement. + +[Illustration: Fig. 28.] + +Having shown how to delineate the locking face of the engaging pallet +when locked, we will now consider how to draft both it and the +disengaging pallet in correct positions when unlocked; to do so we +direct our attention until further notice to Fig. 28. The locking faces +Q M of the engaging and S N of the disengaging pallets are shown in +dotted lines _when locked_. We must now consider the relation which the +locking faces will bear to E B in the engaging, and to F B in the +disengaging pallets when unlocked. This is a question of some +importance; it is easy enough to represent the 12deg. from the 30deg. +angles when locked; we must be certain that they would occupy exactly +that position and yet show them unlocked; we shall take pains to do so. +In due time we shall show that there is no appreciable loss of lift on +the engaging pallet in the escapement illustrated; the angle T A V +therefore shows the total lift; we have not shown the corresponding +angles on the disengaging side because the angles are somewhat +different, but the total lift is still the same. G H represents the +primitive circle of the escape wheel, and X Z that of the real, while +M N represents the circular course which the locking corners of the +pallets take in an equidistant escapement. At a convenient position we +will construct the circle C C' D from the pallet center A. Notice the +points _e_ and _c_, where V A and T A intersect this circle; the space +between _e_ and _c_ represents the extent of the motion of the pallets +at this particular distance from the center A; this being so, then let +us apply it to the engaging pallet. At the point of intersection _o_ of +the dotted line Q M (which is an extended line on which the face of the +pallet lies when locked), with the circle C C' D, we will plant our +dividers and transfer _e c_ to _o n_. By setting our dividers on _o_ M +and transferring to _n_ M', we will obtain the location of Q' M', the +locking face when unlocked. Let us now turn our attention to the +disengaging pallet. The dotted line S N represents the location of the +locking face of the disengaging pallet when locked at an angle of 12deg. +from F B. At the intersection of S N with the circle C C' D we obtain +the point _j_. The motion of the two pallets being equal, we transfer +the distance _e c_ with the dividers from _j_ and obtain the point _l_. +By setting the dividers on _j_ N and transferring to _l_ N' we draw the +line S' N' on which the locking face of the disengaging pallet will be +located when unlocked. It will be perfectly clear to anyone that through +these means we can correctly represent the pallets in any desired +position. + +We will notice that the face Q' M' of the engaging pallet when unlocked +stands at a greater angle to E B than it did when locked, while the +opposite is the case on the disengaging pallet, in which the angle +S' N' F is much less than S N F. This shows that the _deeper_ the +engaging pallet locks, the lighter will the draw be, while the opposite +holds good with the disengaging pallet; also, that the draw increases +during the unlocking of the engaging, and decreases during the unlocking +of the disengaging pallet. These points show that the draw should be +measured with the _fork standing against the bank_; not when the locking +corner of the pallet stands on the primitive circle, as is so often +done. The recoil of the wheel (which determines the draw), is +illustrated by the difference between the locking circle M N and the +face Q M for the engaging, and S N for the disengaging pallet, and along +the _acting_ surface it is alike on each pallet, showing that the draft +angle should be the same on each pallet. + +A number of years ago we constructed the escapement model which we +herewith illustrate. All the parts are adjustable; the pallets can be +moved in any direction, the draft angles can be changed at will. Through +this model we can practically demonstrate the points of which we have +spoken. Such a model can be made by workmen after studying these +papers. + +[Illustration] + +In both the equidistant and circular pallets the locking face S N of the +disengaging pallet deviates more from the locking circle M N than does +the locking face Q M of the engaging pallet, as will be seen in the +diagram. This is because the draft angle is struck from E B which +deviates from the locking circle in such a manner, that if the face of a +pallet were planted on it and _locked deep enough_ to show it, the +wheel would actually _repel_ the pallet, whereas with the disengaging +pallet if it were planted on F B, it would actually produce draw if +locked very deep; this is on account of the natural deviation of the 30deg. +lines from the locking circle. This difference is more pronounced in the +circular than in the equidistant pallet, because in the former we have +two locking circles, the larger one being for the engaging pallet, and +as an arc of a large circle does not deviate as much from a straight +line as does that of a smaller circle, it will be easily understood that +the natural difference before spoken of is only enhanced thereby. For +this reason in order to produce an _actual_ draw of 12deg., the engaging +pallet may be set at a slightly greater angle from E B in the circular +escapement; the amount depends upon the width of the pallets; the +requirements are that the recoil of the wheel will be the same on each +pallet. We must, however, repeat that one of the most important points +is to measure the draw when the fork stands against the bank, thereby +_increasing_ the draw on the engaging and _decreasing_ that of the +disengaging pallet _during_ the unlocking action, thus _naturally_ +balancing one fault with another. + +We will again proceed with the delineation of the escapement here +illustrated. After having drawn the locking face Q M, we draw the angle +of width of teeth of 4 1/2deg., by planting the protractor on the escape +center B. We measure the angle E B K, from the locking face of the +pallet; the line E B does not touch the locking face of the pallet at +the present time of contact with the tooth, therefore a line must be +drawn from the point of contact to the center B. We did so in our +drawing but do not illustrate it, as in a reduced engraving of this kind +it would be too close to E B and would only cause confusion. We will now +draw in the lifting angle of 3deg. for the tooth. From the tangent C A we +draw T A at the required angle; at the point of intersection of T A with +the 30deg. line E B we have the real circumference of the escape wheel. It +will only be necessary to connect the locking edge of the tooth with the +line K B, where the real or outer circle intersects it. It must be drawn +in the same manner in the circular escapement; if the tooth were drawn +up to the intersection of K B with T A, the lift would be too great, as +that point is further from the center A than the points of contact are. + +If the real or outer circle of the wheel intersects both the locking +circle M N and the path O of the discharging edge at the points where +T A intersects them, then there will be _no loss_ of lift on the +engaging pallet. This is precisely how it is in the diagram; but if +there is any deviation, then the angle of loss must be measured on the +_real_ diameter of the wheel and not on the primitive, as is usually +done, as the real diameter of the wheel, or in other words the heel of +the tooth, forms the last point of contact. With a wider tooth and a +greater lifting angle there will even be a _gain_ of lift on the +engaging pallet; the pallet in such a case would actually require a +smaller lifting angle, according to the amount of gain. We gave full +directions for measuring the loss when describing its effects in Fig. 8. +Whatever the loss amounts to, it is added to the lifting plane of the +pallet. In the diagram under discussion there is no loss, consequently +the lifting angle on the pallet is to be 5 1/2deg. From V' A we draw V A at +the required angle; the point of intersection of V A with the path O +will be the discharging edge O. It will now only be necessary to connect +the locking corner M with it, and we have the lifting plane of the +pallet; the discharging side of the pallet is then drawn parallel to the +locking face and made a suitable length. We will now draw the locking +edges of the tooth by placing the center of the protractor on the +locking edge M and construct the angle B M M' of 24deg. and draw a circle +from the scape center B, to which the line M M' will be a tangent. We +will utilize this circle in drawing in the faces of the other teeth +after having spaced them off 24deg. apart, by simply putting a ruler on +the locking edges and on the periphery of the circle. + +We now construct W' A as a tangent to the outer circle of the wheel, +thus forming the lifting angle D A W' of 3deg. for the teeth; this +corresponds to the angle T A C on the engaging side. W' A touches the +outer circle of the wheel at the intersection of F B with it. We will +notice that there is considerable deviation of W' A from the circle at +the intersection of J B with it. At the intersecting of this point we +draw U A; the angle U A W' is the loss of lift. This angle must be added +to the lifting angle of the pallets; we see that in this action there is +no loss on the engaging pallet, but on the disengaging the loss amounts +to approximately 7/8deg. in the action illustrated. As we have allowed +1/4deg. of run for the pallets, the discharging edge P is removed at +this angle from U A; we do not illustrate it, as the lines would cause +confusion being so close together. The lifting angle on the pallet is +measured from the point P and amounts to 5 1/2deg. + the angle of the +loss; the angle W A U embraces the above angles besides 1/4deg. for run. +If the locks are equal on each pallet, it proves that the lifts are also +equal. This gives us a practical method of proving the correctness of +the drawing; to do so, place the dividers on the locking circle M N at +the intersection of T A and V A with it, as this is the extent of +motion; transfer this measurement to N, if the _actual_ lift is the same +on each pallet, the dividers will locate the point which the locking +corner N will occupy _when locked_; this, in the present case, will be +at an angle of 1 3/4deg. below the tangent D A. By this simple method, +the correctness of our proposition that the loss of lift should be +measured from the outside circle of the wheel, can be proven. We often +see the loss measured for the engaging pallet on the primitive +circumference G H, and on the real circumference for the disengaging; if +one is right then the other must be wrong, as there is a noticeable +deviation of the tangent C A from the primitive circle G H at the +intersection of the locking circle M N; had we added this amount to the +lifting angle V' A V of the engaging pallet, the result would have been +that the discharging edge O would be over 1deg. below its present +location, thus showing that by the time the lift on the engaging pallet +had been completed, the locking corner N of the disengaging pallet would +be locked at an angle of 2 3/4deg. instead of only 1 3/4deg. Many +watches contain precisely this fault. If we wish to make a draft showing +the pallets at any desired position, at the center of motion for +instance, with the fork standing on the line of centers, we would +proceed in the following manner: 10 1/4deg. being the total motion, +one-half would equal 5 1/8deg.; as the total lock equals 1 3/4deg., we +deduct this amount from it which leaves 5 1/8 - 1 3/4 = 3 3/8deg., which +is the angle at which the locking corner M should be shown above the +tangent C A. Now let us see where the locking corner N should stand; M +having moved up 5 1/8deg., therefore N moved down by that amount, the +lift on the pallet being 5 1/2deg. and on the tooth 3deg. (which is +added to the tangent D A), it follows that N should stand +5 1/2 + 3 - 5 1/8 = 3 3/8deg. above D A. We can prove it by the lock, +namely: 3 3/8deg. + 1 3/4 = 5 1/8deg., half the remaining motion. This +shows how simple it is to draft pallets in various positions, +remembering always to use the tangents to the primitive circle as +measuring points. We have fully explained how to draw in the draft angle +on the pallets when unlocked, and do not require to repeat it, except to +say, that most authorities draw a tangent R N to the locking circle M N, +forming in other words, the right angle R N A, then construct an angle +of 12deg. from R N. We have drawn ours in by our own method, which is +the correct one. While we here illustrate S N R at an angle of 12deg. it +is in reality _less_ than that amount; had we constructed S N at an +angle of 12deg. from R N, then the draw would be 12deg. from F B, when +the primitive circumference of the wheel is reached, but _more_ than +12deg. when the fork is against the bank. + +The space between the discharging edge P and the heel of the tooth forms +the angle of drop J B I of 1 1/2deg.; the definition for drop is that it is +the freedom for wheel and pallet. This is not, strictly speaking, +perfectly correct, as, during the unlocking action there will be a +recoil of the wheel to the extent of the draft angle; the heel of the +tooth will therefore approach the edge P, and the discharging side of +the pallet approaches the tooth, as only the discharging edge moves on +the path P. + +A good length for the teeth is 1/10 the diameter of the wheel, measured +from the primitive diameter and from the locking edge of the tooth. + +The backs of the teeth are hollowed out so as not to interfere with the +pallets, and are given a nice form; likewise the rim and arms are drawn +in as light and as neat as possible, consistent with strength. + +Having explained the delineation of the wheel and pallet action we will +now turn our attention to that of the fork and roller. We tried to +explain these actions in such a manner that by the time we came to +delineate them no difficulty would be found, as in our analysis we +discussed the subject sufficiently to enable any one of ordinary +intelligence to obtain a correct knowledge of them. The fork and roller +action in straight line, right, or any other angle is delineated after +the methods we are about to give. + +We specified that the acting length of fork was to be equal to the +center distance of wheel and pallets; this gives a fork of a fair +length. + +Having drawn the line of centers A' A we will construct an angle equal +to half the angular motion of the pallets; the latter in the case under +consideration being 10 1/4deg., therefore 5 1/8deg. is spaced off on +each side of the line of centers, forming the angles _m_ A _k_ of +10 1/4deg. Placing our dividers on A B the center distance of 'scape +wheel and pallets, we plant them on A and construct _c c_; thus we will +have the acting length of fork and its path. We saw in our analysis that +the impulse angle should be as small as possible. We will use one of +28deg. in our draft of the double roller; we might however remark that +this angle should vary with the construction of the escapements in +different watches; if too small, the balance may be stopped when the +escapement is locked, while if too great it can be stopped during the +lift; both these defects are to be avoided. The angles being +respectively 10 1/4deg. and 28deg. it follows they are of the following +proportions: 28deg. / 10.25 = 2.7316. The impulse radius therefore bears +this relation (but in the inverse ratio to the angles), to the acting +length of fork. + +We will put it in the following proportion; let A_c_ equal acting length +of fork, and _x_ the unknown quantity; 28:10.25 :: A_c_:_x_; the answer +will be the theoretical impulse radius. Having found the required radius +we plant one jaw of our measuring instrument on the point of +intersection of _c c_ with _k_ A or _m_ A and locate the other jaw on +the line of centers; we thus obtain A' the balance center. Through the +points of intersection before designated we will draft X A' and Y A' +forming the impulse angle X A' Y of 28deg. At the intersection of this +angle with the fork angle _k_ A' _m_, we draw _i i_ from the center A; +this gives us the theoretical impulse circle. The total lock being +1 3/4deg. it follows that the angle described by the balance in +unlocking = 1 3/4 x 2.7316 = 4.788deg. According to the specifications +the width of slot is to be 5 1/8deg.; placing the center of the +protractor on A we construct half of this angle on each side of _k_ A, +which passes through the center of the fork when it rests against the +bank; this gives us the angle _s_ A _n_ of 5 1/8deg. If the disengaging +pallet were shown locked then _m_ A would represent the center of the +fork. The slot is to be made of sufficient depth so there will be no +possibility of the ruby pin touching the bottom of it. The ruby pin is +to have 1 1/4deg. freedom in passing the acting edge of the fork; from +the center A we construct the angle _t_ A _n_ of 1 1/4deg.; at the point +of intersection of _t_ A with _c c_ the acting radius of the fork, we +locate the real impulse radius and draw the arc _ri ri_ which describes +the path made by the face of the ruby pin. The ruby pin is to have +1/4deg. of shake in the slot; it will therefore have a width of +4 7/8deg.; this width is drawn in with the ruby pin imagined as standing +over the line of centers and is then transferred to the position which +the ruby pin is to occupy in the drawing. + +The radius of the safety roller was given as 4/7 of the theoretical +impulse radius. They may be made of various proportions; thus 2/3 is often +used. Remember that the smaller we make it, the less the friction during +accidental contact with the guard pin, the greater must the passing +hollow be and the horn of fork and guard point must be longer, which +increases the weight of the fork. + +Having drawn in the safety roller, and having specified that the freedom +between the dart and safety roller was to be 1 1/4deg., the dart being +in the center of the fork, consequently _k_ A is the center of it; +therefore we construct the angle _k_ A X of 1 1/4deg. At the point of +intersection of X A with the safety roller we draw the arc _g g_; this +locates the point of the dart which we will now draw in. We will next +draw _d_ A' from the balance center and touching the point of the dart; +we now construct _b_ A' at an angle of 5deg. to it. This is to allow the +necessary freedom for the dart when entering the crescent; from A' we +draw a line through the center of the ruby pin. We do not show it in the +drawing, as it would be indiscernible, coming very close to A' X. This +line will also pass through the center of the crescent. At the point of +intersection of A' _b_ with the safety roller we have one of the edges +of the crescent. By placing our compass at the center of the crescent on +the periphery of the roller and on the edge which we have just found, it +follows that our compass will span the radius of the crescent. We now +sweep the arc for the latter, thus also drawing in the remaining half of +the crescent on the other side of A' X and bringing the crescent of +sufficient depth that no possibility exists of the dart touching in or +on the edges of it. We will now draw in the impulse roller and make it +as light as possible consistent with strength. A hole is shown through +the impulse roller to counterbalance the reduced weight at the crescent. +When describing Fig. 24, we gave instructions for finding the dimensions +of crescent and position of guard pin for the single roller. We will +find the length of horn; to do so we must closely follow directions +given for Fig. 25. In locating the end of the horn, we must find the +location of the center of the crescent and ruby pin _after_ the edge of +the crescent has passed the dart. From the point of intersection of +A' _b_ with the safety roller we transfer the radius of the crescent on +the periphery of the safety roller towards the side against the bank, +then draw a line from A' through the point so found. At point of +intersection of this line with the real impulse circle _r i r i_ we draw +an arc radiating from the pallet center; the end of the horn will be +located on this arc. In our drawing the arc spoken of coincides with the +dart radius _g g_. As before pointed out, we gave particulars when +treating on Fig. 25, therefore considered it unnecessary to further +complicate the draft by the addition of all the constructional lines. We +specified that the freedom between ruby pin and end of horn was to be +1 1/2deg.; these lines, (which we do not show) are drawn from the pallet +center. Having located the end of the horn on the side standing against +the bank, we place the dividers on it and on the point of intersection +of _k_ A with _g g_--which in this case is on the point of the +dart,--and transfer this measurement along _g g_ which will locate the +end of the horn on the opposite side. + +We have the acting edges of the fork on _cc_ and have also found the +position of the ends of the horns; their curvature is drawn in the +following manner: We place our compasses on A and _r i_, spanning +therefore the real impulse radius; the compass is now set on the acting +edge of the fork and an arc swept with it which is then to be +intersected by another arc swept from the end of the horn, on the same +side of the fork. At the point of intersection of the arcs the compass +is planted and the curvature of the horn drawn in, the same operation is +to be repeated with the other horn. We will now draw in the sides of the +horn of such a form that should the watch rebank, the side of the ruby +pin will squarely strike the fork. If the back of the ruby pin strikes +the fork there will be a greater tendency of breaking it and injuring +the pivots on account of acting like a wedge. The fork and pallets are +now drawn in as lightly as possible and of such form as to admit of +their being readily poised. The banks are to be drawn at equal distances +from the line of centers. In delineating the fork and roller action in +any desired position, it must be remembered that the points of location +of the real impulse radius, the end of horn, the dart or guard pin and +crescent, must _all_ be obtained _when standing against the bank_, and +the arcs drawn which they describe; the parts are then located according +to the angle at which they are removed from the banks. + +We think the instructions given are ample to enable any one to master +the subject. We may add that when one becomes well acquainted with the +escapement, many of the angles radiating from a common center, may be +drawn in at once. We had intended describing the mechanical construction +of the escapement, which does unmistakably present some difficulties on +account of the small dimensions of the parts, but nevertheless it can be +mechanically executed true to the principles enumerated. We have evolved +a method of so producing them that young men in a comparatively short +period have made them from their drafts (without automatic machinery) +that their watches start off when run down the moment the crown is +touched. Perhaps later on we will write up the subject. It is our +intention of doing so, as we make use of such explanations in our +regular work. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Analysis of the Lever Escapement, by +H. R. Playtner + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEVER *** + +***** This file should be named 21978.txt or 21978.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/1/9/7/21978/ + +Produced by Sigal Alon, Fox in the Stars, Laura Wisewell +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/21978.zip b/21978.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b05f63d --- /dev/null +++ b/21978.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2b47c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #21978 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21978) |
