diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 01:19:23 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 01:19:23 -0700 |
| commit | 7e9bfcc35c91d96bed9717692d2b79b28e460139 (patch) | |
| tree | 46f6be6295414ae013e86bf15c4b1fe0cd0608b8 /20125-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '20125-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 20125-h/20125-h.htm | 9580 |
1 files changed, 9580 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/20125-h/20125-h.htm b/20125-h/20125-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1396b17 --- /dev/null +++ b/20125-h/20125-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,9580 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of A Preface to Politics, by Walter Lippmann</title> +<style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; + } + hr { width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} + + body{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + .center {text-align: center;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + hr.full { width: 100%; + height: 5px; } + pre { font-size: 80%; } + //--> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> +</head> +<body> +<h1>The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Preface to Politics, by Walter Lippmann</h1> +<pre> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at <a href = "http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></pre> +<p>Title: A Preface to Politics</p> +<p>Author: Walter Lippmann</p> +<p>Release Date: December 16, 2006 [eBook #20125]</p> +<p>Language: English</p> +<p>Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1</p> +<p>***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A PREFACE TO POLITICS***</p> +<br><br><center><h3>E-text prepared by Matt Whittaker, Juliet Sutherland,<br> + and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team<br> + (http://www.pgdp.net/)</h3></center><br><br> + +<hr class="full" noshade> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<br> + + <h1>A PREFACE TO POLITICS</h1> +<br><br> + <h3>BY</h3> +<br><br> + <h2>WALTER LIPPMANN</h2> + +<br><br><br> + <h5>"A God wilt thou create for thyself<br /> + out of thy seven devils."</h5> +<br><br> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<br> + + <p class="center">MITCHELL KENNERLEY<br /> + NEW YORK AND LONDON<br /> + 1914</p> +<br><br><br><br> + + <p class="center">COPYRIGHT, 1913, BY<br /> + MITCHELL KENNERLEY</p> +<br><br><br><br> + + + +<h2><i>Contents</i></h2> +<div class='center'> +<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td> +<small>CHAPTER</small> </td><td> </td><td> <small> PAGE</small></td></tr> + +<tr><td></td><td><a href="#intro"><span class="smcap">Introduction</span></a></td><td></td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>I.</td><td> <a href="#ch1"> Routineer and Inventor</a> </td><td align='right'> 1</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>II.</td><td> <a href="#ch2">The Taboo</a> </td><td align='right'> 34</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>III.</td><td> <a href="#ch3">The Changing Focus</a> </td><td align='right'> 53</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>IV.</td><td> <a href="#ch4">The Golden Rule and After</a> </td><td align='right'> 86</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>V.</td><td> <a href="#ch5">Well Meaning but Unmeaning: the Chicago Vice Report</a> </td><td align='right'> 122</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>VI.</td><td> <a href="#ch6">Some Necessary Iconoclasm</a> </td><td align='right'> 159</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>VII.</td><td> <a href="#ch7">The Making of Creeds</a> </td><td align='right'> 204</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>VIII.</td><td> <a href="#ch8">The Red Herring</a> </td><td align='right'> 247</td></tr> + +<tr><td align='right'>IX.</td><td> <a href="#ch9">Revolution and Culture</a> </td><td align='right'> 273</td></tr> +</table> +</div> + + +<br><br><br> + +<h2><a name="intro">INTRODUCTION</a></h2> +<br><br> + +<p>The most incisive comment on politics to-day +is indifference. When men and women begin +to feel that elections and legislatures do not +matter very much, that politics is a rather distant +and unimportant exercise, the reformer might +as well put to himself a few searching doubts. +Indifference is a criticism that cuts beneath oppositions +and wranglings by calling the political +method itself into question. Leaders in public +affairs recognize this. They know that no attack +is so disastrous as silence, that no invective is +so blasting as the wise and indulgent smile of +the people who do not care. Eager to believe +that all the world is as interested as they are, +there comes a time when even the reformer is +compelled to face the fairly widespread suspicion +of the average man that politics is an exhibition +in which there is much ado about nothing. But +such moments of illumination are rare. They +appear in writers who realize how large is the +public that doesn't read their books, in reformers +who venture to compare the membership list of +their league with the census of the United States. +Whoever has been granted such a moment of insight +knows how exquisitely painful it is. To +conquer it men turn generally to their ancient +comforter, self-deception: they complain about +the stolid, inert masses and the apathy of the +people. In a more confidential tone they will +tell you that the ordinary citizen is a "hopelessly +private person."</p> + +<p>The reformer is himself not lacking in stolidity +if he can believe such a fiction of a people that +crowds about tickers and demands the news of +the day before it happens, that trembles on the +verge of a panic over the unguarded utterance +of a financier, and founds a new religion every +month or so. But after a while self-deception +ceases to be a comfort. This is when the reformer +notices how indifference to politics is settling +upon some of the most alert minds of our +generation, entering into the attitude of men as +capable as any reformer of large and imaginative +interests. For among the keenest minds, among +artists, scientists and philosophers, there is a remarkable +inclination to make a virtue of political +indifference. Too passionate an absorption in +public affairs is felt to be a somewhat shallow +performance, and the reformer is patronized as +a well-meaning but rather dull fellow. This is +the criticism of men engaged in some genuinely +creative labor. Often it is unexpressed, often as +not the artist or scientist will join in a political +movement. But in the depths of his soul there +is, I suspect, some feeling which says to the +politician, "Why so hot, my little sir?"</p> + +<p>Nothing, too, is more illuminating than the +painful way in which many people cultivate a +knowledge of public affairs because they have a +conscience and wish to do a citizen's duty. Having +read a number of articles on the tariff and +ploughed through the metaphysics of the currency +question, what do they do? They turn with all +the more zest to some spontaneous human interest. +Perhaps they follow, follow, follow +Roosevelt everywhere, and live with him through +the emotions of a great battle. But for the affairs +of statecraft, for the very policies that a +Roosevelt advocates, the interest is largely perfunctory, +maintained out of a sense of duty and +dropped with a sigh of relief.</p> + +<p>That reaction may not be as deplorable as it +seems. Pick up your newspaper, read the Congressional +Record, run over in your mind the +"issues" of a campaign, and then ask yourself +whether the average man is entirely to blame +because he smiles a bit at Armageddon and refuses +to take the politician at his own rhetorical +valuation. If men find statecraft uninteresting, +may it not be that statecraft <i>is</i> uninteresting? +I have a more or less professional interest in +public affairs; that is to say, I have had opportunity +to look at politics from the point of view +of the man who is trying to get the attention of +people in order to carry through some reform. +At first it was a hard confession to make, but the +more I saw of politics at first-hand, the more I +respected the indifference of the public. There +was something monotonously trivial and irrelevant +about our reformist enthusiasm, and an appalling +justice in that half-conscious criticism +which refuses to place politics among the genuine, +creative activities of men. Science was valid, art +was valid, the poorest grubber in a laboratory +was engaged in a real labor, anyone who had +found expression in some beautiful object was +truly centered. But politics was a personal drama +without meaning or a vague abstraction without +substance.</p> + +<p>Yet there was the fact, just as indisputable +as ever, that public affairs do have an enormous +and intimate effect upon our lives. They make +or unmake us. They are the foundation of that +national vigor through which civilizations mature. +City and countryside, factories and play, schools +and the family are powerful influences in every +life, and politics is directly concerned with them. +If politics is irrelevant, it is certainly not because +its subject matter is unimportant. Public +affairs govern our thinking and doing with subtlety +and persistence.</p> + +<p>The trouble, I figured, must be in the way +politics is concerned with the nation's interests. +If public business seems to drift aimlessly, its +results are, nevertheless, of the highest consequence. +In statecraft the penalties and rewards +are tremendous. Perhaps the approach is distorted. +Perhaps uncriticised assumptions have +obscured the real uses of politics. Perhaps an +attitude can be worked out which will engage +a fresher attention. For there are, I believe, +blunders in our political thinking which confuse +fictitious activity with genuine achievement, and +make it difficult for men to know where they +should enlist. Perhaps if we can see politics in +a different light, it will rivet our creative interests.</p> + +<p>These essays, then, are an attempt to sketch +an attitude towards statecraft. I have tried to +suggest an approach, to illustrate it concretely, +to prepare a point of view. In selecting for the +title "A Preface to Politics," I have wished to +stamp upon the whole book my own sense that +it is a beginning and not a conclusion. I have +wished to emphasize that there is nothing in this +book which can be drafted into a legislative proposal +and presented to the legislature the day +after to-morrow. It was not written with the +notion that these pages would contain an adequate +exposition of modern political method. Much +less was it written to further a concrete program. +There are, I hope, no assumptions put forward +as dogmas.</p> + +<p>It is a preliminary sketch for a theory of +politics, a preface to thinking. Like all speculation +about human affairs, it is the result of a +grapple with problems as they appear in the experience +of one man. For though a personal +vision may at times assume an eloquent and universal +language, it is well never to forget that +all philosophies are the language of particular +men.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p align=right>W. L.</p> + +<p><small>46 East 80th Street, <span class="smcap">New York City</span>, January 1913.</small></p></div> + +<br><br><br> + + + +<h1>A PREFACE TO POLITICS</h1> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch1">CHAPTER I</a></h2> +<h3>ROUTINEER AND INVENTOR</h3> + +<br> +<p>Politics does not exist for the sake of +demonstrating the superior righteousness +of anybody. It is not a competition in deportment. +In fact, before you can begin to think +about politics at all you have to abandon the notion +that there is a war between good men and bad +men. That is one of the great American superstitions. +More than any other fetish it has ruined +our sense of political values by glorifying the +pharisee with his vain cruelty to individuals and +his unfounded approval of himself. You have +only to look at the Senate of the United States, to +see how that body is capable of turning itself into +a court of preliminary hearings for the Last Judgment, +wasting its time and our time and absorbing +public enthusiasm and newspaper scareheads. For +a hundred needs of the nation it has no thought, +but about the precise morality of an historical +transaction eight years old there is a meticulous +interest. Whether in the Presidential Campaign +of 1904 Roosevelt was aware that the ancient +tradition of corporate subscriptions had or had +not been followed, and the exact and ultimate +measure of the guilt that knowledge would have +implied--this in the year 1912 is enough to start +the Senate on a protracted man-hunt.</p> + +<p>Now if one half of the people is bent upon +proving how wicked a man is and the other half +is determined to show how good he is, neither +half will think very much about the nation. An +innocent paragraph in the New York Evening +Post for August 27, 1912, gives the whole performance +away. It shows as clearly as words +could how disastrous the good-and-bad-man theory +is to political thinking:</p> + +<p>"Provided the first hearing takes place on September +30, it is expected that the developments +will be made with a view to keeping the Colonel +on the defensive. After the beginning of October, +it is pointed out, the evidence before the +Committee should keep him so busy explaining +and denying that the country will not hear much +Bull Moose doctrine."</p> + +<p>Whether you like the Roosevelt doctrines or +not, there can be no two opinions about such an +abuse of morality. It is a flat public loss, another +attempt to befuddle our thinking. For if +politics is merely a guerilla war between the +bribed and the unbribed, then statecraft is not a +human service but a moral testing ground. It is +a public amusement, a melodrama of real life, in +which a few conspicuous characters are tried, and +it resembles nothing so much as schoolboy hazing +which we are told exists for the high purpose of +detecting a "yellow streak." But even though we +desired it there would be no way of establishing +any clear-cut difference in politics between the +angels and the imps. The angels are largely self-appointed, +being somewhat more sensitive to +other people's tar than their own.</p> + +<p>But if the issue is not between honesty and +dishonesty, where is it?</p> + +<p>If you stare at a checkerboard you can see it +as black on red, or red on black, as series of +horizontal, vertical or diagonal steps which recede +or protrude. The longer you look the more +patterns you can trace, and the more certain it +becomes that there is no single way of looking at +the board. So with political issues. There is +no obvious cleavage which everyone recognizes. +Many patterns appear in the national life. The +"progressives" say the issue is between "Privilege" +and the "People"; the Socialists, that it is between +the "working class" and the "master class." An +apologist for dynamite told me once that society +was divided into the weak and the strong, and +there are people who draw a line between Philistia +and Bohemia.</p> + +<p>When you rise up and announce that the conflict +is between this and that, you mean that this +particular conflict interests you. The issue of +good-and-bad-men interests this nation to the exclusion +of almost all others. But experience +shows, I believe, that it is a fruitless conflict and +a wasting enthusiasm. Yet some distinction must +be drawn if we are to act at all in politics. With +nothing we are for and nothing to oppose, we +are merely neutral. This cleavage in public affairs +is the most important choice we are called +upon to make. In large measure it determines +the rest of our thinking. Now some issues are +fertile; some are not. Some lead to spacious +results; others are blind alleys. With this in +mind I wish to suggest that the distinction most +worth emphasizing to-day is between those who +regard government as a routine to be administered +and those who regard it as a problem to be +solved.</p> + +<p>The class of routineers is larger than the conservatives. +The man who will follow precedent, +but never create one, is merely an obvious example +of the routineer. You find him desperately +numerous in the civil service, in the official bureaus. +To him government is something given +as unconditionally, as absolutely as ocean or hill. +He goes on winding the tape that he finds. His +imagination has rarely extricated itself from under +the administrative machine to gain any sense of +what a human, temporary contraption the whole +affair is. What he thinks is the heavens above +him is nothing but the roof.</p> + +<p>He is the slave of routine. He can boast of +somewhat more spiritual cousins in the men who +reverence their ancestors' independence, who +feel, as it were, that a disreputable great-grandfather +is necessary to a family's respectability. +These are the routineers gifted with historical +sense. They take their forefathers with enormous +solemnity. But one mistake is rarely +avoided: they imitate the old-fashioned thing +their grandfather did, and ignore the originality +which enabled him to do it.</p> + +<p>If tradition were a reverent record of those +crucial moments when men burst through their +habits, a love of the past would not be the butt +on which every sophomoric radical can practice +his wit. But almost always tradition is nothing +but a record and a machine-made imitation of +the habits that our ancestors created. The average +conservative is a slave to the most incidental +and trivial part of his forefathers' glory--to the +archaic formula which happened to express their +genius or the eighteenth century contrivance by +which for a time it was served. To reverence +Washington they wear a powdered wig; they do +honor to Lincoln by cultivating awkward hands +and ungainly feet.</p> + +<p>It is fascinating to watch this kind of conservative +in action. From Senator Lodge, for +example, we do not expect any new perception +of popular need. We know that probably his +deepest sincerity is an attempt to reproduce the +atmosphere of the Senate a hundred years ago. +The manners of Mr. Lodge have that immobility +which comes from too much gazing at bad statues +of dead statesmen.</p> + +<p>Yet just because a man is in opposition to +Senator Lodge there is no guarantee that he has +freed himself from the routineer's habit of mind. +A prejudice against some mannerism or a dislike +of pretensions may merely cloak some other +kind of routine. Take the "good government" +attitude. No fresh insight is behind that. It +does not promise anything; it does not offer to +contribute new values to human life. The machine +which exists is accepted in all its essentials: +the "goo-goo" yearns for a somewhat smoother +rotation.</p> + +<p>Often as not the very effort to make the existing +machine run more perfectly merely makes +matters worse. For the tinkering reformer is +frequently one of the worst of the routineers. +Even machines are not altogether inflexible, and +sometimes what the reformer regards as a sad +deviation from the original plans is a poor +rickety attempt to adapt the machine to changing +conditions. Think what would have happened +had we actually remained stolidly faithful to +every intention of the Fathers. Think what +would happen if every statute were enforced. By +the sheer force of circumstances we have twisted +constitutions and laws to some approximation of +our needs. A changing country has managed to +live in spite of a static government machine. Perhaps +Bernard Shaw was right when he said that +"the famous Constitution survives only because +whenever any corner of it gets into the way of +the accumulating dollar it is pettishly knocked +off and thrown away. Every social development, +however beneficial and inevitable from the public +point of view, is met, not by an intelligent adaptation +of the social structure to its novelties but by +a panic and a cry of Go Back."</p> + +<p>I am tempted to go further and put into the +same class all those radicals who wish simply to +substitute some other kind of machine for the +one we have. Though not all of them would +accept the name, these reformers are simply +utopia-makers in action. Their perceptions are +more critical than the ordinary conservatives'. +They do see that humanity is badly squeezed in +the existing mould. They have enough imagination +to conceive a different one. But they have +an infinite faith in moulds. This routine they +don't believe in, but they believe in their own: +if you could put the country under a new "system," +then human affairs would run automatically +for the welfare of all. Some improvement +there might be, but as almost all men are +held in an iron devotion to their own creations, +the routine reformers are simply working for +another conservatism, and not for any continuing +liberation.</p> + +<p>The type of statesman we must oppose to the +routineer is one who regards all social organization +as an instrument. Systems, institutions and +mechanical contrivances have for him no virtue +of their own: they are valuable only when they +serve the purposes of men. He uses them, of +course, but with a constant sense that men have +made them, that new ones can be devised, that +only an effort of the will can keep machinery in +its place. He has no faith whatever in automatic +governments. While the routineers see machinery +and precedents revolving with mankind as puppets, +he puts the deliberate, conscious, willing individual +at the center of his philosophy. This +reversal is pregnant with a new outlook for +statecraft. I hope to show that it alone can keep +step with life; it alone is humanly relevant; and +it alone achieves valuable results.</p> + +<p>Call this man a political creator or a political +inventor. The essential quality of him is that he +makes that part of existence which has experience +the master of it. He serves the ideals of human +feelings, not the tendencies of mechanical things.</p> + +<p>The difference between a phonograph and the +human voice is that the phonograph must sing +the song which is stamped upon it. Now there +are days--I suspect the vast majority of them in +most of our lives--when we grind out the thing +that is stamped upon us. It may be the governing +of a city, or teaching school, or running a +business. We do not get out of bed in the morning +because we are eager for the day; something +external--we often call it our duty--throws off +the bed-clothes, complains that the shaving water +isn't hot, puts us into the subway and lands us at +our office in season for punching the time-check. +We revolve with the business for three or four +hours, signing letters, answering telephones, +checking up lists, and perhaps towards twelve +o'clock the prospect of lunch puts a touch of romance +upon life. Then because our days are so +unutterably the same, we turn to the newspapers, +we go to the magazines and read only the "stuff +with punch," we seek out a "show" and drive +serious playwrights into the poorhouse. "You +can go through contemporary life," writes Wells, +"fudging and evading, indulging and slacking, +never really hungry nor frightened nor passionately +stirred, your highest moment a mere sentimental +orgasm, and your first real contact with +primary and elementary necessities the sweat of +your death-bed."</p> + +<p>The world grinds on: we are a fly on the wheel. +That sense of an impersonal machine going on +with endless reiteration is an experience that +imaginative politicians face. Often as not they +disguise it under heroic phrases and still louder +affirmation, just as most of us hide our cowardly +submission to monotony under some word like +duty, loyalty, conscience. If you have ever been +an office-holder or been close to officials, you +must surely have been appalled by the grim way +in which committee-meetings, verbose reports, +flamboyant speeches, requests, and delegations +hold the statesman in a mind-destroying grasp. +Perhaps this is the reason why it has been necessary +to retire Theodore Roosevelt from public +life every now and then in order to give him a +chance to learn something new. Every statesman +like every professor should have his sabbatical +year.</p> + +<p>The revolt against the service of our own mechanical +habits is well known to anyone who has +followed modern thought. As a sharp example +one might point to Thomas Davidson, whom William +James called "individualist à outrance".... +"Reprehending (mildly) a certain chapter of my +own on 'Habit,' he said that it was a fixed rule +with him to form no regular habits. When he +found himself in danger of settling into even a +good one, he made a point of interrupting it."</p> + +<p>Such men are the sparkling streams that flow +through the dusty stretches of a nation. They +invigorate and emphasize those times in your +own life when each day is new. Then you +are alive, then you drive the world before +you. The business, however difficult, shapes itself +to your effort; you seem to manage detail with an +inferior part of yourself, while the real soul of +you is active, planning, light. "I wanted thought +like an edge of steel and desire like a flame." +Eager with sympathy, you and your work are +reflected from many angles. You have become +luminous.</p> + +<p>Some people are predominantly eager and wilful. +The world does not huddle and bend them +to a task. They are not, as we say, creatures +of environment, but creators of it. Of other +people's environment they become the most active +part--the part which sets the fashion. What +they initiate, others imitate. Theirs is a kind of +intrinsic prestige. These are the natural leaders +of men, whether it be as head of the gang or as +founder of a religion.</p> + +<p>It is, I believe, this power of being aggressively +active towards the world which gives man a miraculous +assurance that the world is something +he can make. In creative moments men always +draw upon "some secret spring of certainty, some +fundamental well into which no disturbing glimmers +penetrate." But this is no slack philosophy, +for the chance is denied by which we can lie back +upon the perfection of some mechanical contrivance. +Yet in the light of it government becomes +alert to a process of continual creation, an +unceasing invention of forms to meet constantly +changing needs.</p> + +<p>This philosophy is not only difficult to practice: +it is elusive when you come to state it. For +our political language was made to express a +routine conception of government. It comes to +us from the Eighteenth Century. And no matter +how much we talk about the infusion of the +"evolutionary" point of view into all of modern +thought, when the test is made political practice +shows itself almost virgin to the idea. Our +theories assume, and our language is fitted to +thinking of government as a frame--Massachusetts, +I believe, actually calls her fundamental +law the Frame of Government. We picture political +institutions as mechanically constructed +contrivances within which the nation's life is contained +and compelled to approximate some abstract +idea of justice or liberty. These frames +have very little elasticity, and we take it as an +historical commonplace that sooner or later a +revolution must come to burst the frame apart. +Then a new one is constructed.</p> + +<p>Our own Federal Constitution is a striking example +of this machine conception of government. +It is probably the most important instance we +have of the deliberate application of a mechanical +philosophy to human affairs. Leaving out all +question of the Fathers' ideals, looking simply at +the bias which directed their thinking, is there in +all the world a more plain-spoken attempt to contrive +an automatic governor--a machine which +would preserve its balance without the need of +taking human nature into account? What other +explanation is there for the naïve faith of the +Fathers in the "symmetry" of executive, legislature, +and judiciary; in the fantastic attempts to +circumvent human folly by balancing it with vetoes +and checks? No insight into the evident fact +that power upsets all mechanical foresight and +gravitates toward the natural leaders seems to +have illuminated those historic deliberations. +The Fathers had a rather pale god, they had +only a speaking acquaintance with humanity, so +they put their faith in a scaffold, and it has been +part of our national piety to pretend that they +succeeded.</p> + +<p>They worked with the philosophy of their age. +Living in the Eighteenth Century, they thought +in the images of Newton and Montesquieu. +"The Government of the United States," writes +Woodrow Wilson, "was constructed upon the +Whig theory of political dynamics, which was a +sort of unconscious copy of the Newtonian theory +of the universe.... As Montesquieu pointed out +to them (the English Whigs) in his lucid way, +they had sought to balance executive, legislative +and judiciary off against one another by a series +of checks and counterpoises, which Newton might +readily have recognized as suggestive of the +mechanism of the heavens." No doubt this automatic +and balanced theory of government suited +admirably that distrust of the people which seems +to have been a dominant feeling among the +Fathers. For they were the conservatives of +their day: between '76 and '89 they had gone the +usual way of opportunist radicals. But had they +written the Constitution in the fire of their youth, +they might have made it more democratic,--I +doubt whether they would have made it less mechanical. +The rebellious spirit of Tom Paine expressed +itself in logical formulæ as inflexible to +the pace of life as did the more contented Hamilton's. +This is a determinant which burrows beneath +our ordinary classification of progressive +and reactionary to the spiritual habits of a +period.</p> + +<p>If you look into the early utopias of Fourier +and Saint-Simon, or better still into the early +trade unions, this same faith that a government +can be made to work mechanically is predominant +everywhere. All the devices of rotation in +office, short terms, undelegated authority are simply +attempts to defeat the half-perceived fact that +power will not long stay diffused. It is characteristic +of these primitive democracies that +they worship Man and distrust men. They cling +to some arrangement, hoping against experience +that a government freed from human nature will +automatically produce human benefits. To-day +within the Socialist Party there is perhaps the +greatest surviving example of the desire to offset +natural leadership by artificial contrivance. It is +an article of faith among orthodox socialists that +personalities do not count, and I sincerely believe +I am not exaggerating the case when I say that +their ideal of government is like Gordon Craig's +ideal of the theater--the acting is to be done by +a row of supermarionettes. There is a myth +among socialists to which all are expected to subscribe, +that initiative springs anonymously out of +the mass of the people,--that there are no +"leaders," that the conspicuous figures are no +more influential than the figurehead on the prow +of a ship.</p> + +<p>This is one of the paradoxes of the democratic +movement--that it loves a crowd and fears +the individuals who compose it--that the religion +of humanity should have had no faith in human +beings. Jealous of all individuals, democracies +have turned to machines. They have tried to +blot out human prestige, to minimize the influence +of personality. That there is historical +justification for this fear is plain enough. To +put it briefly, democracy is afraid of the tyrant. +That explains, but does not justify. Governments +have to be carried on by men, however much we +distrust them. Nobody has yet invented a mechanically +beneficent sovereign.</p> + +<p>Democracy has put an unfounded faith in automatic +contrivances. Because it left personality +out of its speculation, it rested in the empty faith +that it had excluded it from reality. But in the +actual stress of life these frictions do not survive +ten minutes. Public officials do not become political +marionettes, though people pretend that they +are. When theory runs against the grain of living +forces, the result is a deceptive theory of politics. +If the real government of the United States +"had, in fact," as Woodrow Wilson says, "been +a machine governed by mechanically automatic +balances, it would have had no history; but it +was not, and its history has been rich with the +influence and personalities of the men who have +conducted it and made it a living reality." Only +by violating the very spirit of the constitution +have we been able to preserve the letter of it. +For behind that balanced plan there grew up +what Senator Beveridge has called so brilliantly +the "invisible government," an empire of natural +groups about natural leaders. Parties are such +groups: they have had a power out of all proportion +to the intentions of the Fathers. Behind the +parties has grown up the "political machine"--falsely +called a machine, the very opposite of one +in fact, a natural sovereignty, I believe. The +really rigid and mechanical thing is the charter +behind which Tammany works. For Tammany +is the real government that has defeated a mechanical +foresight. Tammany is not a freak, a +strange and monstrous excrescence. Its structure +and the laws of its life are, I believe, typical of +all real sovereignties. You can find Tammany +duplicated wherever there is a social group to be +governed--in trade unions, in clubs, in boys' +gangs, in the Four Hundred, in the Socialist +Party. It is an accretion of power around a +center of influence, cemented by patronage, graft, +favors, friendship, loyalties, habits,--a human +grouping, a natural pyramid.</p> + +<p>Only recently have we begun to see that the +"political ring" is not something confined to public +life. It was Lincoln Steffens, I believe, who +first perceived that fact. For a time it was my +privilege to work under him on an investigation +of the "Money Power." The leading idea was +different from customary "muckraking." We +were looking not for the evils of Big Business, +but for its anatomy. Mr. Steffens came to the +subject with a first-hand knowledge of politics. +He knew the "invisible government" of cities, +states, and the nation. He knew how the boss +worked, how he organized his power. When +Mr. Steffens approached the vast confusion and +complication of big business, he needed some +hypothesis to guide him through that maze of +facts. He made a bold and brilliant guess, an +hypothesis. To govern a life insurance company, +Mr. Steffens argued, was just as much "government" +as to run a city. What if political methods +existed in the realm of business? The investigation +was never carried through completely, +but we did study the methods by which several +life and fire insurance companies, banks, two or +three railroads, and several industrials are controlled. +We found that the anatomy of Big +Business was strikingly like that of Tammany +Hall: the same pyramiding of influence, the same +tendency of power to center on individuals who +did not necessarily sit in the official seats, the +same effort of human organization to grow independently +of legal arrangements. Thus in the +life insurance companies, and the Hughes investigation +supports this, the real power was held not +by the president, not by the voters or policy-holders, +but by men who were not even directors. +After a while we took it as a matter of course +that the head of a company was an administrative +dummy, with a dependence on unofficial +power similar to that of Governor Dix on Boss +Murphy. That seems to be typical of the whole +economic life of this country. It is controlled by +groups of men whose influence extends like a web +to smaller, tributary groups, cutting across all +official boundaries and designations, making short +work of all legal formulæ, and exercising sovereignty +regardless of the little fences we erect to +keep it in bounds.</p> + +<p>A glimpse into the labor world revealed very +much the same condition. The boss, and the +bosslet, the heeler--the men who are "it"--all +are there exercising the real power, the power +that independently of charters and elections decides +what shall happen. I don't wish to have +this regarded as necessarily malign. It seems so +now because we put our faith in the ideal arrangements +which it disturbs. But if we could +come to face it squarely--to see that that is what +sovereignty is--that if we are to use human +power for human purposes we must turn to the +realities of it, then we shall have gone far towards +leaving behind us the futile hopes of mechanical +perfection so constantly blasted by +natural facts.</p> + +<p>The invisible government is malign. But the +evil doesn't come from the fact that it plays horse +with the Newtonian theory of the constitution. +What is dangerous about it is that we do not see +it, cannot use it, and are compelled to submit to +it. The nature of political power we shall not +change. If that is the way human societies organize +sovereignty, the sooner we face that fact +the better. For the object of democracy is not to +imitate the rhythm of the stars but to harness +political power to the nation's need. If corporations +and governments have indeed gone on a joy +ride the business of reform is not to set up fences, +Sherman Acts and injunctions into which they can +bump, but to take the wheel and to steer.</p> + +<p>The corruption of which we hear so much is +certainly not accounted for when you have called +it dishonesty. It is too widespread for any such +glib explanation. When you see how business +controls politics, it certainly is not very illuminating +to call the successful business men of a nation +criminals. Yet I suppose that all of them violate +the law. May not this constant dodging or hurdling +of statutes be a sign that there is something +the matter with the statutes? Is it not possible +that graft is the cracking and bursting of the receptacles +in which we have tried to constrain the +business of this country? It seems possible that +business has had to control politics because its +laws were so stupidly obstructive. In the trust +agitation this is especially plausible. For there +is every reason to believe that concentration is a +world-wide tendency, made possible at first by +mechanical inventions, fostered by the disastrous +experiences of competition, and accepted by business +men through contagion and imitation. Certainly +the trusts increase. Wherever politics is +rigid and hostile to that tendency, there is irritation +and struggle, but the agglomeration goes on. +Hindered by political conditions, the process becomes +secretive and morbid. The trust is not +checked, but it is perverted. In 1910 the "American +Banker" estimated that there were 1,198 +corporations with 8,110 subsidiaries liable to all +the penalties of the Sherman Act. Now this concentration +must represent a profound impetus in +the business world--an impetus which certainly +cannot be obliterated, even if anyone were foolish +enough to wish it. I venture to suggest that much +of what is called "corruption" is the odor of a +decaying political system done to death by an +economic growth.</p> + +<p>It is our desperate adherence to an old method +that has produced the confusion of political life. +Because we have insisted upon looking at government +as a frame and governing as a routine, because +in short we have been static in our theories, +politics has such an unreal relation to actual conditions. +Feckless--that is what our politics is. +It is literally eccentric: it has been centered mechanically +instead of vitally. We have, it seems, +been seduced by a fictitious analogy: we have +hoped for machine regularity when we needed +human initiative and leadership, when life was +crying that its inventive abilities should be freed.</p> + +<p>Roosevelt in his term did much to center government +truly. For a time natural leadership and +nominal position coincided, and the administration +became in a measure a real sovereignty. The +routine conception dwindled, and the Roosevelt +appointees went at issues as problems to be +solved. They may have been mistaken: Roosevelt +may be uncritical in his judgments. But the +fact remains that the Roosevelt régime gave a +new prestige to the Presidency by effecting +through it the greatest release of political invention +in a generation. Contrast it with the Taft +administration, and the quality is set in relief. +Taft was the perfect routineer trying to run government +as automatically as possible. His sincerity +consisted in utter respect for form: he denied +himself whatever leadership he was capable +of, and outwardly at least he tried to "balance" +the government. His greatest passions seem to +be purely administrative and legal. The people +did not like it. They said it was dead. They +were right. They had grown accustomed to a +humanly liberating atmosphere in which formality +was an instrument instead of an idol. They had +seen the Roosevelt influence adding to the resources +of life--irrigation, and waterways, conservation, +the Panama Canal, the "country life" +movement. They knew these things were +achieved through initiative that burst through formal +restrictions, and they applauded wildly. It +was only a taste, but it was a taste, a taste of +what government might be like.</p> + +<p>The opposition was instructive. Apart from +those who feared Roosevelt for selfish reasons, +his enemies were men who loved an orderly adherence +to traditional methods. They shivered in +the emotional gale; they obstructed and the gale +became destructive. They felt that, along with +obviously good things, this sudden national fertility +might breed a monster--that a leadership +like Roosevelt's might indeed prove dangerous, +as giving birth may lead to death.</p> + +<p>What the methodically-minded do not see is +that the sterility of a routine is far more appalling. +Not everyone may feel that to push out into +the untried, and take risks for big prizes, is worth +while. Men will tell you that government has no +business to undertake an adventure, to make experiments. +They think that safety lies in repetition, +that if you do nothing, nothing will be done +to you. It's a mistake due to poverty of imagination +and inability to learn from experience. Even +the timidest soul dare not "stand pat." The indictment +against mere routine in government is a +staggering one.</p> + +<p>For while statesmen are pottering along doing +the same thing year in, year out, putting up the +tariff one year and down the next, passing appropriation +bills and recodifying laws, the real forces +in the country do not stand still. Vast changes, +economic and psychological, take place, and these +changes demand new guidance. But the routineers +are always unprepared. It has become one of +the grim trade jokes of innovators that the one +thing you can count upon is that the rulers will +come to think that they are the apex of human development. +For a queer effect of responsibility on +men is that it makes them try to be as much like +machines as possible. Tammany itself becomes +rigid when it is too successful, and only defeat +seems to give it new life. Success makes men +rigid and they tend to exalt stability over all the +other virtues; tired of the effort of willing they +become fanatics about conservatism. But conditions +change whether statesmen wish them to or +not; society must have new institutions to fit new +wants, and all that rigid conservatism can do is +to make the transitions difficult. Violent revolutions +may be charged up to the unreadiness of +statesmen. It is because they will not see, or cannot +see, that feudalism is dead, that chattel slavery +is antiquated; it is because they have not the +wisdom and the audacity to anticipate these great +social changes; it is because they insist upon +standing pat that we have French Revolutions +and Civil Wars.</p> + +<p>But statesmen who had decided that at last +men were to be the masters of their own history, +instead of its victims, would face politics in a +truly revolutionary manner. It would give a new +outlook to statesmanship, turning it from the +mere preservation of order, the administration of +political machinery and the guarding of ancient +privilege to the invention of new political forms, +the prevision of social wants, and the preparation +for new economic growths.</p> + +<p>Such a statesmanship would in the '80's have +prepared for the trust movement. There would +have been nothing miraculous in such foresight. +Standard Oil was dominant by the beginning of +the '80's, and concentration had begun in sugar, +steel and other basic industries. Here was an +economic tendency of revolutionary significance--the +organization of business in a way that was +bound to change the outlook of a whole nation. +It had vast potentialities for good and evil--all it +wanted was harnessing and directing. But the +new thing did not fit into the little outlines and +verbosities which served as a philosophy for our +political hacks. So they gaped at it and let it run +wild, called it names, and threw stones at it. And +by that time the force was too big for them. An +alert statesmanship would have facilitated the +process of concentration; would have made provision +for those who were cast aside; would have +been an ally of trust building, and by that very +fact it would have had an internal grip on the +trust--it would have kept the trust's inner workings +public; it could have bent the trust to social +uses.</p> + +<p>This is not mere wisdom after the event. In +the '80's there were hundreds of thousands of +people in the world who understood that the trust +was a natural economic growth. Karl Marx had +proclaimed it some thirty years before, and it +was a widely circulated idea. Is it asking too +much of a statesman if we expect him to know +political theory and to balance it with the facts +he sees? By the '90's surely, the egregious folly +of a Sherman Anti-Trust Law should have been +evident to any man who pretended to political +leadership. Yet here it is the year 1912 and that +monument of economic ignorance and superstition +is still worshiped with the lips by two out of +the three big national parties.</p> + +<p>Another movement--like that of the trust--is +gathering strength to-day. It is the unification of +wage-workers. We stand in relation to it as the +men of the '80's did to the trusts. It is the complement +of that problem. It also has vast potentialities +for good and evil. It, too, demands understanding +and direction. It, too, will not be +stopped by hard names or injunctions.</p> + +<p>What we loosely call "syndicalism" is a tendency +that no statesman can overlook to-day without +earning the jeers of his children. This labor +movement has a destructive and constructive energy +within it. On its beneficent side it promises +a new professional interest in work, self-education, +and the co-operative management of industry. +But this creative power is constantly choked +off because the unions are compelled to fight for +their lives--the more opposition they meet the +more you are likely to see of sabotage, direct action, +the grève perlée--the less chance there is +for the educative forces to show themselves. +Then, the more violent syndicalism proves itself +to be, the more hysterically we bait it in the usual +vicious circle of ignorance.</p> + +<p>But who amongst us is optimistic enough to +hope that the men who sit in the mighty positions +are going to make a better show of themselves +than their predecessors did over the trust problem? +It strains hope a little too much. Those +men in Washington, most of them lawyers, are +so educated that they are practically incapable of +meeting a new condition. All their training plus +all their natural ossification of mind is hostile to +invention. You cannot endow even the best machine +with initiative; the jolliest steam-roller will +not plant flowers.</p> + +<p>The thought-processes in Washington are too +lumbering for the needs of this nation. Against +that evil muckraking ought to be directed. Those +senators and representatives are largely irrelevant; +they are not concerned with realities. Their +dishonesties are comparatively insignificant. The +scorn of the public should be turned upon the +emptiness of political thought, upon the fact that +those men seem without even a conception of the +nation's needs. And while they maunder along +they stifle the forces of life which are trying to +break through. It was nothing but the insolence +of the routineer that forced Gifford Pinchot out +of the Forest Service. Pinchot in respect to his +subject was a fine political inventor. But routine +forced him out--into what?--into the moil and +toil of fighting for offices, and there he has cut a +poor figure indeed. You may say that he has had +to spend his energy trying to find a chance to use +his power. What a wanton waste of talent is +that for a civilized nation! Wiley is another case +of the creative mind harassed by the routineers. +Judge Lindsey is another--a fine, constructive +children's judge compelled to be a politician. And +of our misuse of the Rockefellers and Carnegies--the +retrospect is appalling. Here was industrial +genius unquestionably beyond the ordinary. +What did this nation do with it? It found no +public use for talent. It left that to operate in +darkness--then opinion rose in an empty fury, +made an outlaw of one and a platitudinous philanthropist +of the other. It could lynch one as a +moral monster, when as a matter of fact his +ideals were commonplace; it could proclaim one +a great benefactor when in truth he was a rather +dull old gentleman. Abused out of all reason or +praised irrelevantly--the one thing this nation +has not been able to do with these men is to use +their genius. It is this life-sapping quality of our +politics that should be fought--its wanton waste +of the initiatives we have--its stupid indifference.</p> + +<p>We need a new sense of political values. These +times require a different order of thinking. We +cannot expect to meet our problems with a few +inherited ideas, uncriticised assumptions, a foggy +vocabulary, and a machine philosophy. Our political +thinking needs the infusion of contemporary +insights. The enormous vitality that is +regenerating other interests can be brought into +the service of politics. Our primary care must +be to keep the habits of the mind flexible and +adapted to the movement of real life. The only +way to control our destiny is to work with it. In +politics, at least, we stoop to conquer. There +is no use, no heroism, in butting against the inevitable, +yet nothing is entirely inevitable. There +is always some choice, some opportunity for human +direction.</p> + +<p>It is not easy. It is far easier to treat life as +if it were dead, men as if they were dolls. It is +everlastingly difficult to keep the mind flexible and +alert. The rule of thumb is not here. To follow +the pace of living requires enormous vigilance +and sympathy. No one can write conclusively +about it. Compared with this creative statesmanship, +the administering of a routine or the battle +for a platitude is a very simple affair. But genuine +politics is not an inhuman task. Part of the +genuineness is its unpretentious humanity. I am +not creating the figure of an ideal statesman out +of some inner fancy. That is just the deepest +error of our political thinking--to talk of politics +without reference to human beings. The creative +men appear in public life in spite of the cold +blanket the politicians throw over them. Really +statesmanlike things are done, inventions are +made. But this real achievement comes to us confused, +mixed with much that is contradictory. +Political inventors are to-day largely unconscious +of their purpose, and, so, defenceless against the +distraction of their routineer enemies.</p> + +<p>Lacking a philosophy they are defenceless +against their own inner tendency to sink into repetition. +As a witty Frenchman remarked, many +geniuses become their own disciples. This is true +when the attention is slack, and effort has lost its +direction. We have elaborate governmental +mechanisms--like the tariff, for example, which +we go on making more "scientific" year in, year +out--having long since lost sight of their human +purpose. They may be defeating the very ends +they were meant to serve. We cling to constitutions +out of "loyalty." We trudge in the treadmill +and call it love of our ancient institutions. +We emulate the mule, that greatest of all +routineers.</p> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch2">CHAPTER II</a></h2> +<h3>THE TABOO</h3> + +<br> +<p>Our government has certainly not measured +up to expectations. Even chronic admirers +of the "balance" and "symmetry" of the Constitution +admit either by word or deed that it did +not foresee the whole history of the American +people. Poor bewildered statesmen, unused to +any notion of change, have seen the national life +grow to a monstrous confusion and sprout monstrous +evils by the way. Men and women clamored +for remedies, vowed, shouted and insisted +that their "official servants" do something--something +statesmanlike--to abate so much evident +wrong. But their representatives had very +little more than a frock coat and a slogan as +equipment for the task. Trained to interpret a +constitution instead of life, these statesmen faced +with historic helplessness the vociferations of ministers, +muckrakers, labor leaders, women's clubs, +granges and reformers' leagues. Out of a tumultuous +medley appeared the common theme of +public opinion--that the leaders should lead, that +the governors should govern.</p> + +<p>The trusts had appeared, labor was restless, +vice seemed to be corrupting the vitality of the +nation. Statesmen had to do something. Their +training was legal and therefore utterly inadequate, +but it was all they had. They became +panicky and reverted to an ancient superstition. +They forbade the existence of evil by law. They +made it anathema. They pronounced it damnable. +They threatened to club it. They issued a legislative +curse, and called upon the district attorney +to do the rest. They started out to abolish human +instincts, check economic tendencies and repress +social changes by laws prohibiting them. +They turned to this sanctified ignorance which is +rampant in almost any nursery, which presides at +family councils, flourishes among "reformers"; +which from time immemorial has haunted legislatures +and courts. Under the spell of it men try +to stop drunkenness by closing the saloons; when +poolrooms shock them they call a policeman; if +Haywood becomes annoying, they procure an injunction. +They meet the evils of dance halls by +barricading them; they go forth to battle against +vice by raiding brothels and fining prostitutes. +For trusts there is a Sherman Act. In spite of +all experience they cling desperately to these superstitions.</p> + +<p>It is the method of the taboo, as naïve as barbarism, +as ancient as human failure.</p> + +<p>There is a law against suicide. It is illegal for +a man to kill himself. What it means in practice, +of course, is that there is punishment waiting +for a man who doesn't succeed in killing himself. +We say to the man who is tired of life that if he +bungles we propose to make this world still less +attractive by clapping him into jail. I know an +economist who has a scheme for keeping down +the population by refusing very poor people a +marriage license. He used to teach Sunday +school and deplore promiscuity. In the annual +report of the president of a distilling company +I once saw the statement that business had increased +in the "dry" states. In a prohibition +town where I lived you could drink all you +wanted by belonging to a "club" or winking at +the druggist. And in another city where Sunday +closing was strictly enforced, a minister told me +with painful surprise that the Monday police +blotter showed less drunks and more wife-beaters.</p> + +<p>We pass a law against race-track gambling +and add to the profits from faro. We raid the +faro joints, and drive gambling into the home, +where poker and bridge whist are taught to children +who follow their parents' example. We +deprive anarchists of free speech by the heavy +hand of a police magistrate, and furnish them +with a practical instead of a theoretical argument +against government. We answer strikes with +bayonets, and make treason one of the rights of +man.</p> + +<p>Everybody knows that when you close the +dance halls you fill the parks. Men who in their +youth took part in "crusades" against the Tenderloin +now admit in a crestfallen way that they +succeeded merely in sprinkling the Tenderloin +through the whole city. Over twenty years ago +we formulated a sweeping taboo against trusts. +Those same twenty years mark the centralization +of industry.</p> + +<p>The routineer in a panic turns to the taboo. +Whatever does not fit into his rigid little scheme +of things must have its head chopped off. Now +human nature and the changing social forces it +generates are the very material which fit least +well into most little schemes of things. A man +cannot sleep in his cradle: whatever is useful must +in the nature of life become useless. We employ +our instruments and abandon them. But nothing +so simply true as that prevails in politics. When +a government routine conflicts with the nation's +purposes--the statesman actually makes a virtue +of his loyalty to the routine. His practice is to +ignore human character and pay no attention to +social forces. The shallow presumption is that +undomesticated impulses can be obliterated; that +world-wide economic inventions can be stamped +out by jailing millionaires--and acting in the +spirit of Mr. Chesterton's man Fipps "who went +mad and ran about the country with an axe, hacking +branches off the trees whenever there were not +the same number on both sides." The routineer +is, of course, the first to decry every radical proposal +as "against human nature." But the stand-pat +mind has forfeited all right to speak for human +nature. It has devoted the centuries to torturing +men's instincts, stamping on them, passing +laws against them, lifting its eyebrows at the +thought of them--doing everything but trying to +understand them. The same people who with +daily insistence say that innovators ignore facts +are in the absurd predicament of trying to still +human wants with petty taboos. Social systems +like ours, which do not even feed and house men +and women, which deny pleasure, cramp play, +ban adventure, propose celibacy and grind out +monotony, are a clear confession of sterility in +statesmanship. And politics, however pretentiously +rhetorical about ideals, is irrelevant if the +only method it knows is to ostracize the desires +it cannot manage.</p> + +<p>Suppose that statesmen transferred their reverence +from the precedents and mistakes of their +ancestors to the human material which they have +set out to govern. Suppose they looked mankind +in the face and asked themselves what was the +result of answering evil with a prohibition. Such +an exercise would, I fear, involve a considerable +strain on what reformers call their moral sensibilities. +For human nature is a rather shocking +affair if you come to it with ordinary romantic +optimism. Certainly the human nature that figures +in most political thinking is a wraith that +never was--not even in the souls of politicians. +"Idealism" creates an abstraction and then shudders +at a reality which does not answer to it. Now +statesmen who have set out to deal with actual +life must deal with actual people. They cannot +afford an inclusive pessimism about mankind. Let +them have the consistency and good sense to cease +bothering about men if men's desires seem intrinsically +evil. Moral judgment about the ultimate +quality of character is dangerous to a politician. +He is too constantly tempted to call a +policeman when he disapproves.</p> + +<p>We must study our failures. Gambling and +drink, for example, produce much misery. But +what reformers have to learn is that men don't +gamble just for the sake of violating the law. +They do so because something within them is satisfied +by betting or drinking. To erect a ban +doesn't stop the want. It merely prevents its satisfaction. +And since this desire for stimulants or +taking a chance at a prize is older and far more +deeply rooted in the nature of men than love of +the Prohibition Party or reverence for laws made +at Albany, people will contrive to drink and gamble +in spite of the acts of a legislature.</p> + +<p>A man may take liquor for a variety of reasons: +he may be thirsty; or depressed; or unusually +happy; he may want the companionship of +a saloon, or he may hope to forget a scolding +wife. Perhaps he needs a "bracer" in a weary +hunt for a job. Perhaps he has a terrible craving +for alcohol. He does not take a drink so +that he may become an habitual drunkard, or be +locked up in jail, or get into a brawl, or lose his +job, or go insane. These are what he might call +the unfortunate by-products of his desire. If +once he could find something which would do for +him what liquor does, without hurting him as +liquor does, there would be no problem of drink. +Bernard Shaw says he has found that substitute +in going to church when there's no service. +Goethe wrote "The Sorrows of Werther" in order +to get rid of his own. Many an unhappy +lover has found peace by expressing his misery +in sonnet form. The problem is to find something +for the common man who is not interested +in contemporary churches and who can't write +sonnets.</p> + +<p>When the socialists in Milwaukee began to experiment +with municipal dances they were greeted +with indignant protests from the "anti-vice" element +and with amused contempt by the newspaper +paragraphers. The dances were discontinued, +and so the belief in their failure is complete. +I think, though, that Mayor Seidel's defense +would by itself make this experiment memorable. +He admitted freely the worst that can +be said against the ordinary dance hall. So far +he was with the petty reformers. Then he +pointed out with considerable vehemence that +dance halls were an urgent social necessity. At +that point he had transcended the mind of the +petty reformer completely. "We propose," said +Seidel, "to go into competition with the devil."</p> + +<p>Nothing deeper has come from an American +mayor in a long, long time. It is the point that +Jane Addams makes in the opening pages of that +wisely sweet book, "The Spirit of Youth and the +City Streets." She calls attention to the fact +that the modern state has failed to provide for +pleasure. "This stupid experiment," she writes, +"of organizing work and failing to organize play +has, of course, brought about a fine revenge. The +love of pleasure will not be denied, and when it +has turned into all sorts of malignant and vicious +appetites, then we, the middle-aged, grow quite +distracted and resort to all sorts of restrictive +measures."</p> + +<p>For human nature seems to have wants that +must be filled. If nobody else supplies them, the +devil will. The demand for pleasure, adventure, +romance has been left to the devil's catering for +so long a time that most people think he inspires +the demand. He doesn't. Our neglect is the +devil's opportunity. What we should use, we let +him abuse, and the corruption of the best things, +as Hume remarked, produces the worst. Pleasure +in our cities has become tied to lobster palaces, +adventure to exalted murderers, romance to +silly, mooning novels. Like the flower girl in +Galsworthy's play, we have made a very considerable +confusion of the life of joy and the joy of +life. The first impulse is to abolish all lobster +palaces, melodramas, yellow newspapers, and +sentimentally erotic novels. Why not abolish all +the devil's works? the reformer wonders. The +answer is in history. It can't be done that way. +It is impossible to abolish either with a law or +an axe the desires of men. It is dangerous, explosively +dangerous, to thwart them for any +length of time. The Puritans tried to choke the +craving for pleasure in early New England. +They had no theaters, no dances, no festivals. +They burned witches instead.</p> + +<p>We rail a good deal against Tammany Hall. +Reform tickets make periodic sallies against it, +crying economy, efficiency, and a business administration. +And we all pretend to be enormously +surprised when the "ignorant foreign vote" prefers +a corrupt political ring to a party of well-dressed, +grammatical, and high-minded gentlemen. +Some of us are even rather downcast about +democracy because the Bowery doesn't take to +heart the admonitions of the Evening Post.</p> + +<p>We forget completely the important wants +supplied by Tammany Hall. We forget that this +is a lonely country for an immigrant and that the +Statue of Liberty doesn't shed her light with too +much warmth. Possessing nothing but a statistical, +inhuman conception of government, the average +municipal reformer looks down contemptuously +upon a man like Tim Sullivan with his +clambakes and his dances; his warm and friendly +saloons, his handshaking and funeral-going and +baby-christening; his readiness to get coal for the +family, and a job for the husband. But a Tim +Sullivan is closer to the heart of statesmanship +than five City Clubs full of people who want low +taxes and orderly bookkeeping. He does things +which have to be done. He humanizes a strange +country; he is a friend at court; he represents the +legitimate kindliness of government, standing between +the poor and the impersonal, uninviting +majesty of the law. Let no man wonder that +Lorimer's people do not prefer an efficiency expert, +that a Tim Sullivan has power, or that men +are loyal to Hinky Dink. The cry raised against +these men by the average reformer is a piece of +cold, unreal, preposterous idealism compared to +the solid warm facts of kindliness, clothes, food +and fun.</p> + +<p>You cannot beat the bosses with the reformer's +taboo. You will not get far on the Bowery with +the cost unit system and low taxes. And I don't +blame the Bowery. You can beat Tammany Hall +permanently in one way--by making the government +of a city as human, as kindly, as jolly as +Tammany Hall. I am aware of the contract-grafts, +the franchise-steals, the dirty streets, the +bribing and the blackmail, the vice-and-crime partnerships, +the Big Business alliances of Tammany +Hall. And yet it seems to me that Tammany has +a better perception of human need, and comes +nearer to being what a government should be, +than any scheme yet proposed by a group of +"uptown good government" enthusiasts. Tammany +is not a satanic instrument of deception, +cleverly devised to thwart "the will of the people." +It is a crude and largely unconscious answer +to certain immediate needs, and without +those needs its power would crumble. That is +why I ventured in the preceding chapter to describe +it as a natural sovereignty which had +grown up behind a mechanical form of government. +It is a poor weed compared to what government +might be. But it is a real government +that has power and serves a want, and not a +frame imposed upon men from on top.</p> + +<p>The taboo--the merely negative law--is the +emptiest of all the impositions from on top. In +its long record of failure, in the comparative success +of Tammany, those who are aiming at social +changes can see a profound lesson; the impulses, +cravings and wants of men must be employed. +You can employ them well or ill, but +you must employ them. A group of reformers +lounging at a club cannot, dare not, decide to +close up another man's club because it is called +a saloon. Unless the reformer can invent something +which substitutes attractive virtues for attractive +vices, he will fail. He will fail because +human nature abhors the vacuum created by the +taboo.</p> + +<p>An incident in the international peace propaganda +illuminates this point. Not long ago a +meeting in Carnegie Hall, New York, to forward +peace among nations broke up in great disorder. +Thousands of people who hate the waste +and futility of war as much as any of the orators +of that evening were filled with an unholy glee. +They chuckled with delight at the idea of a riot +in a peace meeting. Though it would have +seemed perverse to the ordinary pacificist, this +sentiment sprang from a respectable source. It +had the same ground as the instinctive feeling +of nine men in ten that Roosevelt has more right +to talk about peace than William Howard Taft. +James made it articulate in his essay on "The +Moral Equivalent of War." James was a great +advocate of peace, but he understood Theodore +Roosevelt and he spoke for the military man +when he wrote of war that: "Its 'horrors' are a +cheap price to pay for rescue from the only alternative +supposed, of a world of clerks and teachers, +of co-education and zo-ophily, of 'consumers' +leagues' and 'associated charities,' of industrialism +unlimited, and feminism unabashed. No +scorn, no hardness, no valor any more! Fie upon +such a cattleyard of a planet!"</p> + +<p>And he added: "So far as the central essence +of this feeling goes, no healthy minded person, it +seems to me, can help to some degree partaking +of it. Militarism is the great preserver of our +ideals of hardihood, and human life with no use +for hardihood would be contemptible. Without +risks or prizes for the darer, history would be +insipid indeed; and there is a type of military +character which everyone feels that the race +should never cease to breed, for everyone is sensitive +to its superiority."</p> + +<p>So William James proposed not the abolition +of war, but a moral equivalent for it. He +dreamed of "a conscription of the whole youthful +population to form for a certain number of years +a part of the army enlisted against <i>Nature</i>.... +The military ideals of hardihood and discipline +would be wrought into the growing fibre of the +people; no one would remain blind, as the luxurious +classes now are blind, to man's relations to +the globe he lives on, and to the permanently +sour and hard foundations of his higher life." +Now we are not concerned here over the question +of this particular proposal. The telling point in +my opinion is this: that when a wise man, a student +of human nature, and a reformer met in the +same person, the taboo was abandoned. James +has given us a lasting phrase when he speaks of +the "moral equivalent" of evil. We can use it, +I believe, as a guide post to statesmanship. +Rightly understood, the idea behind the words +contains all that is valuable in conservatism, and, +for the first time, gives a reputable meaning to +that tortured epithet "constructive."</p> + +<p>"The military feelings," says James, "are too +deeply grounded to abdicate their place among +our ideals until better substitutes are offered ... +such a conscription, with the state of public opinion +that would have required it, and the many +moral fruits it would bear, would preserve in +the midst of a pacific civilization the manly virtues +which the military party is so afraid of seeing +disappear in peace.... So far, war has +been the only force that can discipline a whole +community, and until an equivalent discipline is +organized I believe that war must have its way. +But I have no serious doubt that the ordinary +prides and shames of social man, once developed +to a certain intensity, are capable of organizing +such a moral equivalent as I have sketched, or +some other just as effective for preserving manliness +of type. It is but a question of time, of +skilful propagandism, and of opinion-making +men seizing historic opportunities. The martial +type of character can be bred without war."</p> + +<p>To find for evil its moral equivalent is to be +conservative about values and radical about +forms, to turn to the establishment of positively +good things instead of trying simply to check bad +ones, to emphasize the additions to life, instead +of the restrictions upon it, to substitute, if you +like, the love of heaven for the fear of hell. Such +a program means the dignified utilization of the +whole nature of man. It will recognize as the +first test of all political systems and moral codes +whether or not they are "against human nature." +It will insist that they be cut to fit the whole man, +not merely a part of him. For there are utopian +proposals made every day which cover about as +much of a human being as a beautiful hat does.</p> + +<p>Instead of tabooing our impulses, we must redirect +them. Instead of trying to crush badness +we must turn the power behind it to good account. +The assumption is that every lust is capable +of some civilized expression.</p> + +<p>We say, in effect, that evil is a way by which +desire expresses itself. The older moralists, the +taboo philosophers believed that the desires themselves +were inherently evil. To us they are the energies +of the soul, neither good nor bad in themselves. +Like dynamite, they are capable of all +sorts of uses, and it is the business of civilization, +through the family and the school, religion, art, +science, and all institutions, to transmute these +energies into fine values. Behind evil there is +power, and it is folly,--wasting and disappointing +folly,--to ignore this power because it has +found an evil issue. All that is dynamic in human +character is in these rooted lusts. The great +error of the taboo has been just this: that it believed +each desire had only one expression, that +if that expression was evil the desire itself was +evil. We know a little better to-day. We know +that it is possible to harness desire to many interests, +that evil is one form of a desire, and not +the nature of it.</p> + +<p>This supplies us with a standard for judging +reforms, and so makes clear what "constructive" +action really is. When it was discovered recently +that the boys' gang was not an unmitigated nuisance +to be chased by a policeman, but a force +that could be made valuable to civilization +through the Boy Scouts, a really constructive reform +was given to the world. The effervescence +of boys on the street, wasted and perverted +through neglect or persecution, was drained and +applied to fine uses. When Percy MacKaye +pleads for pageants in which the people themselves +participate, he offers an opportunity for expressing +some of the lusts of the city in the form +of an art. The Freudian school of psychologists +calls this "sublimation." They have brought forward +a wealth of material which gives us every +reason to believe that the theory of "moral +equivalents" is soundly based, that much the same +energies produce crime and civilization, art, vice, +insanity, love, lust, and religion. In each individual +the original differences are small. Training +and opportunity decide in the main how men's +lust shall emerge. Left to themselves, or ignorantly +tabooed, they break forth in some barbaric +or morbid form. Only by supplying our passions +with civilized interests can we escape their destructive +force.</p> + +<p>I have put it negatively, as a counsel of prudence. +But he who has the courage of existence +will put it triumphantly, crying "yea" as Nietzsche +did, and recognizing that all the passions of +men are the motive powers of a fine life.</p> + +<p>For the roads that lead to heaven and hell are +one until they part.</p> + + +<br><br><br> + +<h2><a name="ch3">CHAPTER III</a></h2> + +<h3>THE CHANGING FOCUS</h3> +<br> + +<p>The taboo, however useless, is at least concrete. +Although it achieves little besides mischief, +it has all the appearance of practical action, +and consequently enlists the enthusiasm of those +people whom Wells describes as rushing about the +country shouting: "For Gawd's sake let's <i>do</i> +something <i>now</i>." There are weight and solidity +in a policeman's club, while a "moral equivalent" +happens to be pale like the stuff of which dreams +are made. To the politician whose daily life consists +in dodging the thousand and one conflicting +prejudices of his constituents, in bickering with +committees, intriguing and playing for the vote; +to the business man harassed on four sides by the +trust, the union, the law, and public opinion,--distrustful +of any wide scheme because the stupidity +of his shipping clerk is the most vivid item +in his mind, all this discussion about politics and +the inner life will sound like so much fine-spun +nonsense.</p> + +<p>I, for one, am not disposed to blame the politicians +and the business men. They govern the +nation, it is true, but they do it in a rather absentminded +fashion. Those revolutionists who +see the misery of the country as a deliberate and +fiendish plot overestimate the bad will, the intelligence +and the singleness of purpose in the +ruling classes. Business and political leaders +don't mean badly; the trouble with them is that +most of the time they don't mean anything. They +picture themselves as very "practical," which in +practice amounts to saying that nothing makes +them feel so spiritually homeless as the discussion +of values and an invitation to examine first principles. +Ideas, most of the time, cause them genuine +distress, and are as disconcerting as an idle +office boy, or a squeaky telephone.</p> + +<p>I do not underestimate the troubles of the man +of affairs. I have lived with politicians,--with +socialist politicians whose good-will was abundant +and intentions constructive. The petty vexations +pile up into mountains; the distracting details +scatter the attention and break up thinking, while +the mere problem of exercising power crowds out +speculation about what to do with it. Personal +jealousies interrupt co-ordinated effort; committee +sessions wear out nerves by their aimless drifting; +constant speech-making turns a man back +upon a convenient little store of platitudes--misunderstanding +and distortion dry up the imagination, +make thought timid and expression flat, the +atmosphere of publicity requires a mask which +soon becomes the reality. Politicians tend to live +"in character," and many a public figure has come +to imitate the journalism which describes him. +You cannot blame politicians if their perceptions +are few and their thinking crude.</p> + +<p>Football strategy does not originate in a scrimmage: +it is useless to expect solutions in a political +campaign. Woodrow Wilson brought to +public life an exceedingly flexible mind,--many of +us when he first emerged rejoiced at the clean +and athletic quality of his thinking. But even he +under the stress of a campaign slackened into +commonplace reiteration, accepting a futile and +intellectually dishonest platform, closing his eyes +to facts, misrepresenting his opponents, abandoning, +in short, the very qualities which distinguished +him. It is understandable. When a National +Committee puts a megaphone to a man's +mouth and tells him to yell, it is difficult for him +to hear anything.</p> + +<p>If a nation's destiny were really bound up with +the politics reported in newspapers, the impasse +would be discouraging. If the important sovereignty +of a country were in what is called its +parliamentary life, then the day of Plato's philosopher-kings +would be far off indeed. Certainly +nobody expects our politicians to become philosophers. +When they do they hide the fact. And +when philosophers try to be politicians they generally +cease to be philosophers. But the truth is +that we overestimate enormously the importance +of nominations, campaigns, and office-holding. If +we are discouraged it is because we tend to identify +statecraft with that official government which +is merely one of its instruments. Vastly over-advertised, +we have mistaken an inflated fragment +for the real political life of the country.</p> + +<p>For if you think of men and their welfare, government +appears at once as nothing but an agent +among many others. The task of civilizing our +impulses by creating fine opportunities for their +expression cannot be accomplished through the +City Hall alone. All the influences of social life +are needed. The eggs do not lie in one basket. +Thus the issues in the trade unions may be far +more directly important to statecraft than the +destiny of the Republican Party. The power that +workingmen generate when they unite--the demands +they will make and the tactics they will +pursue--how they are educating themselves and +the nation--these are genuine issues which bear +upon the future. So with the policies of business +men. Whether financiers are to be sullen and +stupid like Archbold, defiant like Morgan, or +well-intentioned like Perkins is a question that +enters deeply into the industrial issues. The +whole business problem takes on a new complexion +if the representatives of capital are to be +men with the temper of Louis Brandeis or William +C. Redfield. For when business careers are +made professional, new motives enter into the +situation; it will make a world of difference if +the leadership of industry is in the hands of men +interested in production as a creative art instead +of as a brute exploitation. The economic conflicts +are at once raised to a plane of research, +experiment and honest deliberation. For on the +level of hate and mean-seeking no solution is +possible. That subtle fact,--the change of business +motives, the demonstration that industry can +be conducted as medicine is,--may civilize the +whole class conflict.</p> + +<p>Obviously statecraft is concerned with such a +change, extra-political though it is. And wherever +the politician through his prestige or the government +through its universities can stimulate a +revolution in business motives, it should do so. +That is genuinely constructive work, and will do +more to a humane solution of the class struggle +than all the jails and state constabularies that ever +betrayed the barbarism of the Twentieth Century. +It is no wonder that business is such a sordid +affair. We have done our best to exclude from +it every passionate interest that is capable of +lighting up activity with eagerness and joy. "Unbusinesslike" +we have called the devotion of +craftsmen and scientists. We have actually pretended +that the work of extracting a living from +nature could be done most successfully by short-sighted +money-makers encouraged by their money-spending +wives. We are learning better to-day. +We are beginning to know that this nation for all +its boasts has not touched the real possibilities of +business success, that nature and good luck have +done most of our work, that our achievements +come in spite of our ignorance. And so no man +can gauge the civilizing possibilities of a new set +of motives in business. That it will add to the +dignity and value of millions of careers is only +one of its blessings. Given a nation of men +trained to think scientifically about their work and +feel about it as craftsmen, and you have a people +released from a stupid fixation upon the silly little +ideals of accumulating dollars and filling their +neighbor's eye. We preach against commercialism +but without great result. And the reason for +our failure is: that we merely say "you ought not" +instead of offering a new interest. Instead of +telling business men not to be greedy, we should +tell them to be industrial statesmen, applied scientists, +and members of a craft. Politics can aid +that revolution in a hundred Ways: by advocating +it, by furnishing schools that teach, laboratories +that demonstrate, by putting business on the same +plane of interest as the Health Service.</p> + +<p>The indictment against politics to-day is not its +corruption, but its lack of insight. I believe it is +a fact which experience will sustain that men steal +because they haven't anything better to do. You +don't have to preach honesty to men with a creative +purpose. Let a human being throw the energies +of his soul into the making of something, +and the instinct of workmanship will take care of +his honesty. The writers who have nothing to say +are the ones that you can buy: the others have too +high a price. A genuine craftsman will not adulterate +his product: the reason isn't because duty +says he shouldn't, but because passion says he +couldn't. I suggested in an earlier chapter that +the issue of honesty and dishonesty was a futile +one, and I placed faith in the creative men. They +hate shams and the watering of goods on a more +trustworthy basis than the mere routine moralist. +To them dishonesty is a contradiction of their +own lusts, and they ask no credit, need none, for +being true. Creation is an emotional ascent, +which makes the standard vices trivial, and turns +all that is valuable in virtue to the service of +desire.</p> + +<p>When politics revolves mechanically it ceases to +use the real energies of a nation. Government is +then at once irrelevant and mischievous--a mere +obstructive nuisance. Not long ago a prominent +senator remarked that he didn't know much about +the country, because he had spent the last few +months in Washington. It was a profound utterance +as anyone can testify who reads, let us say, +the Congressional Record. For that document, +though replete with language, is singularly unacquainted +with the forces that agitate the nation. +Politics, as the contributors to the Congressional +Record seem to understand it, is a very limited selection +of well-worn debates on a few arbitrarily +chosen "problems." Those questions have developed +a technique and an interest in them for +their own sake. They are handled with a dull +solemnity quite out of proportion to their real interest. +Labor receives only a perfunctory and +largely disingenuous attention; even commerce is +handled in a way that expresses neither its direction +nor its public use. Congress has been ready +enough to grant favors to corporations, but where +in its wrangling from the Sherman Act to the +Commerce Court has it shown any sympathetic +understanding of the constructive purposes in the +trust movement? It has either presented the +business man with money or harassed him with +bungling enthusiasm in the pretended interests of +the consumer. The one thing Congress has not +done is to use the talents of business men for the +nation's advantage.</p> + +<p>If "politics" has been indifferent to forces like +the union and the trust, it is no exaggeration to +say that it has displayed a modest ignorance of +women's problems, of educational conflicts and +racial aspirations; of the control of newspapers +and magazines, the book publishing world, socialist +conventions and unofficial political groups like +the single-taxers.</p> + +<p>Such genuine powers do not absorb our political +interest because we are fooled by the regalia +of office. But statesmanship, if it is to be relevant, +would obtain a new perspective on these +dynamic currents, would find out the wants they +express and the energies they contain, would shape +and direct and guide them. For unions and +trusts, sects, clubs and voluntary associations +stand for actual needs. The size of their following, +the intensity of their demands are a fair index +of what the statesman must think about. No +lawyer created a trust though he drew up its +charter; no logician made the labor movement or +the feminist agitation. If you ask what for political +purposes a nation is, a practical answer +would be: it is its "movements." They are the +social <i>life</i>. So far as the future is man-made it +is made of them. They show their real vitality +by a relentless growth in spite of all the little +fences and obstacles that foolish politicians devise.</p> + +<p>There is, of course, much that is dead within +the movements. Each one carries along a quantity +of inert and outworn ideas,--not infrequently +there is an internally contradictory current. Thus +the very workingmen who agitate for a better +diffusion of wealth display a marked hostility to +improvements in the production of it. The feminists +too have their atavisms: not a few who object +to the patriarchal family seem inclined to +cure it by going back still more--to the matriarchal. +Constructive business has no end of reactionary +moments----the most striking, perhaps, +is when it buys up patents in order to suppress +them. Yet these inversions, though discouraging, +are not essential in the life of movements. They +need to be expurgated by an unceasing criticism; +yet in bulk the forces I have mentioned, and many +others less important, carry with them the creative +powers of our times.</p> + +<p>It is not surprising that so many political inventions +have been made within these movements, +fostered by them, and brought to a general +public notice through their efforts. When +some constructive proposal is being agitated before +a legislative committee, it is customary to +unite the "movements" in support of it. Trade +unions and women's clubs have joined hands in +many an agitation. There are proposals to-day, +like the minimum wage, which seem sure of support +from consumers' leagues, women's federations, +trade unions and those far-sighted business +men who may be called "State Socialists."</p> + +<p>In fact, unless a political invention is woven +into a social movement it has no importance. +Only when that is done is it imbued with life. +But how among countless suggestions is a "cause" +to know the difference between a true invention +and a pipe-dream? There is, of course, no infallible +touchstone by which we can tell offhand. +No one need hope for an easy certainty either +here or anywhere else in human affairs. No one +is absolved from experiment and constant revision. +Yet there are some hypotheses that +prima facie deserve more attention than others.</p> + +<p>Those are the suggestions which come out of a +recognized human need. If a man proposed that +the judges of the Supreme Court be reduced from +nine to seven because the number seven has mystical +power, we could ignore him. But if he suggested +that the number be reduced because seven +men can deliberate more effectively than nine he +ought to be given a hearing. Or let us suppose +that the argument is about granting votes to +women. The suffragist who bases a claim on the +so-called "logic of democracy" is making the +poorest possible showing for a good cause. I +have heard people maintain that: "it makes no +difference whether women want the ballot, or are +fit for it, or can do any good with it,--this country +is a democracy. Democracy means government +by the votes of the people. Women are +people. Therefore women should vote." That +in a very simple form is the mechanical conception +of government. For notice how it ignores +human wants and human powers--how it subordinates +people to a rigid formula. I use this +crude example because it shows that even the most +genuine and deeply grounded demands are as yet +unable to free themselves entirely from a superficial +manner of thinking. We are only partially +emancipated from the mechanical and merely logical +tradition of the Eighteenth Century. No end +of illustrations could be adduced. In the Socialist +party it has been the custom to denounce the +"short ballot." Why? Because it reduces the +number of elective offices. This is regarded as +undemocratic for the reason that democracy has +come to mean a series of elections. According to +a logic, the more elections the more democratic. +But experience has shown that a seven-foot ballot +with a regiment of names is so bewildering that a +real choice is impossible. So it is proposed to +cut down the number of elective offices, focus the +attention on a few alternatives, and turn voting +into a fairly intelligent performance. Here is an +attempt to fit political devices to the actual powers +of the voter. The old, crude form of ballot +forgot that finite beings had to operate it. But +the "democrats" adhere to the multitude of +choices because "logic" requires them to.</p> + +<p>This incident of the "short ballot" illustrates +the cleavage between invention and routine. The +socialists oppose it not because their intentions are +bad but because on this issue their thinking is mechanical. +Instead of applying the test of human +need, they apply a verbal and logical consistency. +The "short ballot" in itself is a slight affair, but +the insight behind it seems to me capable of revolutionary +development. It is one symptom of the +effort to found institutions on human nature. +There are many others. We might point to the +first experiments aimed at remedying the helter-skelter +of careers by vocational guidance. Carried +through successfully, this invention of Prof. +Parsons' is one whose significance in happiness can +hardly be exaggerated. When you think of the +misfits among your acquaintances--the lawyers +who should be mechanics, the doctors who should +be business men, the teachers who should have +been clerks, and the executives who should be doing +research in a laboratory--when you think of +the talent that would be released by proper use, +the imagination takes wing at the possibilities. +What could we not make of the world if we employed +its genius!</p> + +<p>Whoever is working to express special energies +is part of a constructive revolution. Whoever is +removing the stunting environments of our occupations +is doing the fundamentals of reform. +The studies of Miss Goldmark of industrial fatigue, +recuperative power and maximum productivity +are contributions toward that distant and +desirable period when labor shall be a free and +joyous activity. Every suggestion which turns +work from a drudgery to a craft is worth our +deepest interest. For until then the labor problem +will never be solved. The socialist demand +for a better distribution of wealth is of great consequence, +but without a change in the very nature +of labor society will not have achieved the happiness +it expects. That is why imaginative socialists +have shown so great an interest in "syndicalism." +There at least in some of its forms, we +can catch sight of a desire to make all labor a +self-governing craft.</p> + +<p>The handling of crime has been touched by the +modern impetus. The ancient, abstract and +wholesale "justice" is breaking up into detailed +and carefully adapted treatment of individual offenders. +What this means for the child has become +common knowledge in late years. Criminology +(to use an awkward word) is finding a +human center. So is education. Everyone knows +how child study is revolutionizing the school room +and the curriculum. Why, it seems that Mme. +Montessori has had the audacity to sacrifice the +sacred bench to the interests of the pupil! The +traditional school seems to be vanishing--that +place in which an ill-assorted band of youngsters +was for a certain number of hours each day placed +in the vicinity of a text-book and a maiden lady.</p> + +<p>I mention these experiments at random. It is +not the specific reforms that I wish to emphasize +but the great possibilities they foreshadow. +Whether or not we adopt certain special bills, +high tariff or low tariff, one banking system or +another, this trust control or that, is a slight gain +compared to a change of attitude toward all political +problems. The reformer bound up in his +special propaganda will, of course, object that "to +get something done is worth more than any +amount of talk about new ways of looking at political +problems." What matters the method, he +will cry, provided the reform be good? Well, the +method matters more than any particular reform. +A man who couldn't think straight might get the +right answer to one problem, but how much faith +would you have in his capacity to solve the next +one? If you wanted to educate a child, would +you teach him to read one play of Shakespeare, +or would you teach him to <i>read</i>? If the world +were going to remain frigidly set after next year, +we might well thank our stars if we blundered +into a few decent solutions right away. But as +there is no prospect of a time when our life will +be immutably fixed, as we shall, therefore, have +to go on inventing, it is fair to say that what the +world is aching for is not a special reform embodied +in a particular statute, but a way of going +at all problems. The lasting value of Darwin, +for example, is not in any concrete conclusion he +reached. His importance to the world lies in +the new twist he gave to science. He lent it fruitful +direction, a different impetus, and the results +are beyond his imagining.</p> + +<p>In that spiritual autobiography of a searching +mind, "The New Machiavelli," Wells describes +his progress from a reformer of concrete +abuses to a revolutionist in method. "You see," +he says, "I began in my teens by wanting to plan +and build cities and harbors for mankind; I ended +in the middle thirties by desiring only to serve and +increase a general process of thought, a process +fearless, critical, real-spirited, that would in its +own time give cities, harbors, air, happiness, +everything at a scale and quality and in a light +altogether beyond the match-striking imaginations +of a contemporary mind...."</p> + +<p>This same veering of interest may be seen in +the career of another Englishman. I refer to +Mr. Graham Wallas. Back in the '80's he was +working with the Webbs, Bernard Shaw, Sidney +Olivier, Annie Besant and others in socialist +propaganda. Readers of the Fabian Essays +know Mr. Wallas and appreciate the work of his +group. Perhaps more than anyone else, the Fabians +are responsible for turning English socialist +thought from the verbalism of the Marxian disciples +to the actualities of English political life. +Their appetite for the concrete was enormous; +their knowledge of facts overpowering, as the +tomes produced by Mr. and Mrs. Webb can testify. +The socialism of the Fabians soon became +a definite legislative program which the various +political parties were to be bulldozed, cajoled and +tricked into enacting. It was effective work, and +few can question the value of it. Yet many admirers +have been left with a sense of inadequacy.</p> + +<p>Unlike the orthodox socialists, the Fabians +took an active part in immediate politics. "We +permeated the party organizations," writes Shaw, +"and pulled all the wires we could lay our hands +on with our utmost adroitness and energy.... +The generalship of this movement was undertaken +chiefly by Sidney Webb, who played such +bewildering conjuring tricks with the Liberal +thimbles and the Fabian peas that to this day both +the Liberals and the sectarian Socialists stand +aghast at him." Few Americans know how great +has been this influence on English political history +for the last twenty years. The well-known Minority +Report of the Poor Law Commission bears +the Webb signature most conspicuously. Fabianism +began to achieve a reputation for getting +things done--for taking part in "practical affairs." +Bernard Shaw has found time to do no +end of campaigning and even the parochial politics +of a vestryman has not seemed too insignificant +for his Fabian enthusiasm. Graham Wallas +was a candidate in five municipal elections, and +has held an important office as member of the +London County Council.</p> + +<p>But the original Fabian enthusiasm has slackened. +One might ascribe it to a growing sense +that concrete programs by themselves will not insure +any profound regeneration of society. H. +G. Wells has been savage and often unfair about +the Fabian Society, but in "The New Machiavelli" +he touched, I believe, the real disillusionment. +Remington's history is in a way symbolic. +Here was a successful political reformer, coming +more and more to a disturbing recognition of his +helplessness, perceiving the aimlessness and the +unreality of political life, and announcing his contempt +for the "crudification" of all issues. What +Remington missed was what so many reformers +are beginning to miss--an underlying philosophical +habit.</p> + +<p>Mr. Wallas seems to have had much the same +experience. In the midst of a bustle of activity, +politics appeared to have no center to which its +thinking and doing could be referred. The truth +was driven home upon him that political science +is a science of human relationship with the human +beings left out. So he writes that "the thinkers +of the past, from Plato to Bentham and Mill, had +each his own view of human nature, and they +made these views the basis of their speculations +on government." But to-day "nearly all students +of politics analyze institutions and avoid the analysis +of man." Whoever has read the typical book +on politics by a professor or a reformer will +agree, I think, when he adds: "One feels that +many of the more systematic books on politics by +American University professors are useless, just +because the writers dealt with abstract men, +formed on assumptions of which they were unaware +and which they have never tested either by +experience or by study."</p> + +<p>An extreme example could be made of Nicholas +Murray Butler, President of Columbia University. +In the space of six months he wrote an impassioned +defense of "constitutional government," +beginning with the question, "Why is it +that in the United States the words politics and +politician have associations that are chiefly of evil +omen," and then, to make irony complete, proceeded +at the New York State Republican Convention +to do the jobbery of Boss Barnes. What +is there left but to gasp and wonder whether the +words of the intellect have anything to do with +the facts of life? What insight into reality can +a man possess who is capable of discussing politics +and ignoring politicians? What kind of +naïveté was it that led this educator into asking +such a question?</p> + +<p>President Butler is, I grant, a caricature of the +typical professor. Yet what shall we say of the +annual harvest of treatises on "labor problems" +which make no analysis of the mental condition +of laboring men; of the treatises on marriage +and prostitution which gloss over the sexual life +of the individual? "In the other sciences which +deal with human affairs," writes Mr. Wallas, referring +to pedagogy and criminology, "this division +between the study of the thing done and +the study of the being who does it is not found."</p> + +<p>I have in my hands a text-book of six hundred +pages which is used in the largest universities as +a groundwork of political economy. This remarkable +sentence strikes the eye: "The motives +to business activity are too familiar to require +analysis." But some sense that perhaps the "economic +man" is not a self-evident creature seems +to have touched our author. So we are treated +to these sapient remarks: "To avoid this criticism +we will begin with a characterization of the typical +business man to be found to-day in the United +States and other countries in the same stage of +industrial development. <i>He has four traits +which show themselves more or less clearly in all +of his acts.</i>" They are first "self-interest," but +"this does not mean that he is steeped in selfishness ..."; +secondly, "the larger self," the +family, union, club, and "in times of emergency +his country"; thirdly, "love of independence," for +"his ambition is to stand on his own feet"; +fourthly, "business ethics" which "are not usually +as high as the standards professed in churches, +but they are much higher than current criticisms +of business would lead one to think." Three-quarters +of a page is sufficient for this penetrating +analysis of motive and is followed by the remark +that "these four characteristics of the economic man +are readily explained by reference to +the evolutionary process which has brought industrial +society to its present stage of development."</p> + +<p>If those were the generalizations of a tired +business man after a heavy dinner and a big cigar, +they would still seem rather muddled and useless. +But as the basis of an economic treatise in which +"laws" are announced, "principles" laid down, reforms +criticized as "impracticable," all for the +benefit of thousands of college students, it is +hardly possible to exaggerate the folly of such an +exhibition. I have taken a book written by one +eminent professor and evidently approved by others, +for they use it as a text-book. It is no queer +freak. I myself was supposed to read that book +pretty nearly every week for a year. With hundreds +of others I was supposed to found my economic +understanding upon it. We were actually +punished for not reading that book. It was given +to us as wisdom, as modern political economy.</p> + +<p>But what goes by the name to-day is a potpourri +in which one can distinguish descriptions +of legal forms, charters and institutions; comparative +studies of governmental and social machinery; +the history of institutions, a few "principles" +like the law of rent, some moral admonitions, +a good deal of class feeling, not a little +timidity--but almost no attempt to cut beneath +these manifestations of social life to the creative +impulses which produce them. The Economic +Man--that lazy abstraction--is still paraded in +the lecture room; the study of human nature has +not advanced beyond the gossip of old wives.</p> + +<p>Graham Wallas touched the cause of the +trouble when he pointed out that political science +to-day discusses institutions and ignores the nature +of the men who make and live under them. +I have heard professors reply that it wasn't their +business to discuss human nature but to record +and interpret economic and political facts. Yet if +you probe those "interpretations" there is no escaping +the conclusion that they rest upon some +notion of what man is like. "The student of +politics," writes Mr. Wallas, "must, consciously +or unconsciously, form a conception of human +nature, and the less conscious he is of his conception +the more likely he is to be dominated by it." +For politics is an interest of men--a tool which +they fabricate and use--and no comment has +much value if it tries to get along without mankind. +You might as well try to describe food by +ignoring the digestion.</p> + +<p>Mr. Wallas has called a halt. I think we may +say that his is the distinction of having turned +the study of politics back to the humane tradition +of Plato and Machiavelli--of having made man +the center of political investigation. The very +title of his book--"Human Nature in Politics"--is +significant. Now in making that statement, I +am aware that it is a sweeping one, and I do not +mean to imply that Mr. Wallas is the only modern +man who has tried to think about politics +psychologically. Here in America alone we have +two splendid critics, a man and a woman, whose +thought flows from an interpretation of human +character. Thorstein Veblen's brilliant descriptions +penetrate deeply into our mental life, and +Jane Addams has given new hope to many of us +by her capacity for making ideals the goal of +natural desire.</p> + +<p>Nor is it just to pass by such a suggestive +thinker as Gabriel Tarde, even though we may +feel that his psychology is too simple and his +conclusions somewhat overdriven by a favorite +theory. The work of Gustav Le Bon on +"crowds" has, of course, passed into current +thought, but I doubt whether anyone could say +that he had even prepared a basis for a new political +psychology. His own aversion to reform, his +fondness for vast epochs and his contempt for +current effort have left most of his "psychological +laws" in the region of interesting literary +comment. There are, too, any number of "social +psychologies," such as those of Ross and McDougall. +But the trouble with them is that the +"psychology" is weak and uninformed, distorted +by moral enthusiasms, and put out without any +particular reference to the task of statesmanship. +When you come to special problems, the literature +of the subject picks up. Crime is receiving +valuable attention, education is profoundly affected, +alcoholism and sex have been handled for +a good while on a psychological basis.</p> + +<p>But it remained for Mr. Wallas to state the +philosophy of the matter--to say why the study +of human nature must serve politics, and to point +out how. He has not produced a political +psychology, but he has written the manifesto for +it. As a result, fragmentary investigations can +be brought together and applied to the work of +statecraft. Merely by making these researches +self-conscious, he has made clearer their goal, +given them direction, and kindled them to practical +action. How necessary this work is can be +seen in the writing of Miss Addams. Owing to +keen insight and fine sympathy her thinking has +generally been on a human basis. Yet Miss Addams +is a reformer, and sympathy without an +explicit philosophy may lead to a distorted enthusiasm. +Her book on prostitution seems rather +the product of her moral fervor than her human +insight. Compare it with "The Spirit of Youth" +or "Newer Ideals of Peace" or "Democracy and +Social Ethics" and I think you will notice a very +considerable willingness to gloss over human need +in the interests of an unanalyzed reform. To put +it bluntly, Miss Addams let her impatience get +the better of her wisdom. She had written brilliantly +about sex and its "sublimation," she had +suggested notable "moral equivalents" for vice, +but when she touched the white slave traffic its +horrors were so great that she also put her faith +in the policeman and the district attorney. "A +New Conscience and an Ancient Evil" is an hysterical +book, just because the real philosophical +basis of Miss Addams' thinking was not deliberate +enough to withstand the shock of a poignant +horror.</p> + +<p>It is this weakness that Mr. Wallas comes to +remedy. He has described what political science +must be like, and anyone who has absorbed his +insight has an intellectual groundwork for political +observation. No one, least of all Mr. Wallas, +would claim anything like finality for the essay. +These labors are not done in a day. But he has +deliberately brought the study of politics to the +only focus which has any rational interest for +mankind. He has made a plea, and sketched a +plan which hundreds of investigators the world +over must help to realize. If political science +could travel in the direction suggested, its criticism +would be relevant, its proposals practical. +There would, for the first time, be a concerted +effort to build a civilization around mankind, to +use its talent and to satisfy its needs. There +would be no more empty taboos, no erecting of +institutions upon abstract and mechanical analogies. +Politics would be like education--an effort +to develop, train and nurture men's impulses. As +Montessori is building the school around the +child, so politics would build all of social life +around the human being.</p> + +<p>That practical issues hang upon these investigations +can be shown by an example from Mr. +Wallas's book. Take the quarrel over socialism. +You hear it said that without the private ownership +of capital people will lose ambition and sink +into sloth. Many men, just as well aware of +present-day evils as the socialists, are unwilling to +accept the collectivist remedy. G. K. Chesterton +and Hilaire Belloc speak of the "magic of property" +as the real obstacle to socialism. Now obviously +this is a question of first-rate importance. +If socialism will destroy initiative then only a doctrinaire +would desire it. But how is the question +to be solved? You cannot reason it out. Economics, +as we know it to-day, is quite incapable +of answering such a problem, for it is a matter +that depends upon psychological investigation. +When a professor says that socialism is impracticable +he begs the question, for that amounts to +assuming that the point at issue is already settled. +If he tells you that socialism is against human +nature, we have a perfect right to ask where +he proved the possibilities of human nature.</p> + +<p>But note how Mr. Wallas approaches the debate: +"Children quarrel furiously at a very early +age over apparently worthless things, and collect +and hide them long before they can have any clear +notion of the advantages to be derived from individual +possession. Those children who in certain +charity schools are brought up entirely without +personal property, even in their clothes or +pocket handkerchiefs, show every sign of the bad +effect on health and character which results from +complete inability to satisfy a strong inherited instinct.... +Some economist ought therefore +to give us a treatise in which this property instinct +is carefully and quantitatively examined.... +How far can it be eliminated or modified by education? +Is it satisfied by a leasehold or a life-interest, +or by such an arrangement of corporate +property as is offered by a collegiate foundation, +or by the provision of a public park? Does it require +for its satisfaction material and visible +things such as land or houses, or is the holding, +say, of colonial railway shares sufficient? Is the +absence of unlimited proprietary rights felt more +strongly in the case of personal chattels (such as +furniture and ornaments) than in the case of land +or machinery? Does the degree and direction of +the instinct markedly differ among different individuals +or races, or between the two sexes?"</p> + +<p>This puts the argument upon a plane where discussion +is relevant. This is no trumped-up issue: +it is asked by a politician and a socialist seeking +for a real solution. We need to know whether +the "magic of property" extends from a man's +garden to Standard Oil stocks as anti-socialists +say, and, conversely, we need to know what is +happening to that mass of proletarians who own +no property and cannot satisfy their instincts +even with personal chattels.</p> + +<p>For if ownership is a human need, we certainly +cannot taboo it as the extreme communists so dogmatically +urge. "Pending ... an inquiry," +writes Mr. Wallas, "my own provisional opinion +is that, like a good many instincts of very early +evolutionary origin, it can be satisfied by an +avowed pretense; just as a kitten which is fed +regularly on milk can be kept in good health if +it is allowed to indulge its hunting instinct by playing +with a bobbin, and a peaceful civil servant satisfies +his instinct of combat and adventure at +golf."</p> + +<p>Mr. Wallas takes exactly the same position as +William James did when he planned a "moral +equivalent" for war. Both men illustrate the +changing focus of political thought. Both try to +found statesmanship on human need. Both see +that there are good and bad satisfactions of the +same impulse. The routineer with his taboo does +not see this, so he attempts the impossible task of +obliterating the impulse. He differs fundamentally +from the creative politician who devotes +himself to inventing fine expressions for human +needs, who recognizes that the work of statesmanship +is in large measure the finding of good substitutes +for the bad things we want.</p> + +<p>This is the heart of a political revolution. +When we recognize that the focus of politics is +shifting from a mechanical to a human center we +shall have reached what is, I believe, the most essential +idea in modern politics. More than any +other generalization it illuminates the currents of +our national life and explains the altering tasks +of statesmanship.</p> + +<p>The old effort was to harness mankind to abstract +principles--liberty, justice or equality--and +to deduce institutions from these high-sounding +words. It did not succeed because human nature +was contrary and restive. The new effort proposes +to fit creeds and institutions to the wants of +men, to satisfy their impulses as fully and beneficially +as possible.</p> + +<p>And yet we do not begin to know our desires or +the art of their satisfaction. Mr. Wallas's book +and the special literature of the subject leave no +doubt that a precise political psychology is far off +indeed. The human nature we must put at the +center of our statesmanship is only partially understood. +True, Mr. Wallas works with a psychology +that is fairly well superseded. But not +even the advance-guard to-day, what we may call +the Freudian school, would claim that it had +brought knowledge to a point where politics could +use it in any very deep or comprehensive way. +The subject is crude and fragmentary, though we +are entitled to call it promising.</p> + +<p>Yet the fact had better be faced: psychology +has not gone far enough, its results are still too +vague for our purposes. We know very little, +and what we know has hardly been applied to +political problems. That the last few years have +witnessed a revolution in the study of mental life +is plain: the effects are felt not only in psychotherapy, +but in education, morals, religion, and +no end of cultural interests. The impetus of +Freud is perhaps the greatest advance ever made +towards the understanding and control of human +character. But for the complexities of politics it +is not yet ready. It will take time and endless +labor for a detailed study of social problems in +the light of this growing knowledge.</p> + +<p>What then shall we do now? Must we continue +to muddle along in the old ruts, gazing rapturously +at an impotent ideal, until the works of +the scientists are matured?</p> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch4">CHAPTER IV</a></h2> + +<h3>THE GOLDEN RULE AND AFTER</h3> +<br> + +<p>It would indeed be an intolerably pedantic performance +for a nation to sit still and wait for +its scientists to report on their labors. The notion +is typical of the pitfalls in the path of any theorist +who does not correct his logic by a constant reference +to the movement of life. It is true that +statecraft must make human nature its basis. It +is true that its chief task is the invention of forms +and institutions which satisfy the inner needs of +mankind. And it is true that our knowledge of +those needs and the technique of their satisfaction +is hazy, unorganized and blundering.</p> + +<p>But to suppose that the remedy lies in waiting +for monographs from the research of the laboratory +is to have lost a sense of the rhythm of actual +affairs. That is not the way things come about: +we grow into a new point of view: only afterwards, +in looking back, do we see the landmarks +of our progress. Thus it is customary to say that +Adam Smith dates the change from the old mercantilist +economy to the capitalistic economics of +the nineteenth century. But that is a manner of +speech. The old mercantilist policy was giving +way to early industrialism: a thousand unconscious +economic and social forces were compelling the +change. Adam Smith expressed the process, +named it, idealized it and made it self-conscious. +Then because men were clearer about what they +were doing, they could in a measure direct their +destiny.</p> + +<p>That is but another way of saying that great +revolutionary changes do not spring full-armed +from anybody's brow. A genius usually becomes +the luminous center of a nation's crisis,--men see +better by the light of him. His bias deflects their +actions. Unquestionably the doctrine-driven men +who made the economics of the last century had +much to do with the halo which encircled the +smutted head of industrialism. They put the +stamp of their genius on certain inhuman practices, +and of course it has been the part of the +academic mind to imitate them ever since. The +orthodox economists are in the unenviable position +of having taken their morals from the exploiter +and of having translated them into the +grandiloquent language of high public policy. +They gave capitalism the sanction of the intellect. +When later, Carlyle and Ruskin battered the economists +into silence with invective and irony they +were voicing the dumb protest of the humane people +of England. They helped to organize a formless +resentment by endowing it with intelligence +and will.</p> + +<p>So it is to-day. If this nation did not show an +unmistakable tendency to put men at the center +of politics instead of machinery and things; if +there were not evidence to prove that we are turning +from the sterile taboo to the creation of finer +environments; if the impetus for shaping our destiny +were not present in our politics and our life, +then essays like these would be so much baying +at the moon, fantastic and unworthy pleas for +some irrelevant paradise. But the gropings are +there,--vastly confused in the tangled strains of +the nation's interests. Clogged by the confusion, +half-choked by stupid blockades, largely unaware +of their own purposes, it is for criticism, organized +research, and artistic expression to free and +to use these creative energies. They are to be +found in the aspirations of labor, among the awakened +women, in the development of business, the +diffusion of art and science, in the racial mixtures, +and many lesser interests which cluster about these +greater movements.</p> + +<p>The desire for a human politics is all about us. +It rises to the surface in slogans like "human +rights above property rights," "the man above the +dollar." Some measure of its strength is given +by the widespread imitation these expressions +have compelled: politicians who haven't the slightest +intention of putting men above the dollar, who +if they had wouldn't know how, take off their hats +to the sentiment because it seems a key to popular +enthusiasm. It must be bewildering to men +brought up, let us say, in the Hanna school of politics. +For here is this nation which sixteen years +ago vibrated ecstatically to that magic word +"Prosperity"; to-day statistical rhetoric about +size induces little but excessive boredom. If you +wish to drive an audience out of the hall tell it +how rich America is; if you wish to stamp yourself +an echo of the past talk to us young men +about the Republican Party's understanding with +God in respect to bumper crops. But talk to us +about "human rights," and though you talk rubbish, +we'll listen. For our desire is bent that way, +and anything which has the flavor of this new interest +will rivet our attention. We are still uncritical. +It is only a few years since we began to +center our politics upon human beings. We have +no training in that kind of thought. Our schools +and colleges have helped us hardly at all. We +still talk about "humanity" as if it were some +strange and mystical creature which could not possibly +be composed of the grocer, the street-car +conductor and our aunts.</p> + +<p>That the opinion-making people of America +are more interested in human welfare than in empire +or abstract prosperity is an item that no +statesman can disregard in his thinking. To-day +it is no longer necessary to run against the grain +of the deepest movements of our time. There is +an ascendant feeling among the people that all +achievement should be measured in human happiness. +This feeling has not always existed. Historians +tell us that the very idea of progress in +well-being is not much older than, say, Shakespeare's +plays. As a general belief it is still +more recent. The nineteenth century may perhaps +be said to mark its popularization. But as +a fact of immediate politics, as a touchstone applied +quickly to all the acts of statecraft in +America it belongs to the Twentieth Century. +There were any number of people who long before +1900 saw that dollars and men could clash. +But their insight had not won any general acceptance. +It is only within the last few years that +the human test has ceased to be the property of a +small group and become the convention of a large +majority. A study of magazines and newspapers +would confirm this rather broad generalization. +It would show, I believe, how the whole quality +of our most impromptu thinking is being influenced +by human values.</p> + +<p>The statesman must look to this largely unorganized +drift of desire. He will find it clustering +about certain big revolts--the unrest of +women, for example, or the increasing demands +of industrial workers. Rightly understood, these +social currents would, I believe, lead to the central +issues of life, the vital points upon which +happiness depends. They come out of necessities. +They express desire. They are power.</p> + +<p>Thus feminism, arising out of a crisis in sexual +conditions, has liberated energies that are themselves +the motors of any reform. In England +and America voting has become the symbol of an +aspiration as yet half-conscious and undefined. +What women want is surely something a great +deal deeper than the privilege of taking part in +elections. They are looking for a readjustment +of their relations to the home, to work, to children, +to men, to the interests of civilized life. +The vote has become a convenient peg upon which +to hang aspirations that are not at all sure of +their own meaning. In no insignificant number +of cases the vote is a cover by which revolutionary +demands can be given a conventional front. +The ballot is at the utmost a beginning, as far-sighted +conservatives have guessed. Certainly +the elimination of "male" from the suffrage qualifications +will not end the feminist agitation. From +the angle of statecraft the future of the movement +may be said to depend upon the wise use of +this raw and scattered power. I do not pretend +to know in detail how this can be done. But I +am certain that the task of leadership is to organize +aspiration in the service of the real interests +of life. To-day women want--what? +They are ready to want something: that describes +fairly the condition of most suffragettes. Those +who like Ellen Key and Olive Shreiner and Mrs. +Gilman give them real problems to think about +are drafting that energy into use. By real problems +I mean problems of love, work, home, children. +They are the real interests of feminism +because they have produced it.</p> + +<p>The yearnings of to-day are the symptoms of +needs, they point the course of invention, they +are the energies which animate a social program. +The most ideally conceived plan of the human +mind has only a slight interest if it does not harness +these instinctive forces. That is the great +lesson which the utopias teach by their failure--that +schemes, however nicely arranged, cannot be +imposed upon human beings who are interested +in other things. What ailed Don Quixote was +that he and his contemporaries wanted different +things; the only ideals that count are those which +express the possible development of an existing +force. Reformers must never forget that three +legs are a Quixotic ideal; two good legs a genuine +one.</p> + +<p>In actual life, yes, in the moil and toil of propaganda, +"movements," "causes" and agitations the +statesman-inventor and the political psychologist +find the raw material for their work. It is not +the business of the politician to preserve an Olympian +indifference to what stupid people call "popular +whim." Being lofty about the "passing fad" +and the ephemeral outcry is all very well in the +biographies of dead men, but rank nonsense in +the rulers of real ones. Oscar Wilde once remarked +that only superficial people disliked the +superficial. Nothing, for example, could on the +surface be more trivial than an interest in baseball +scores. Yet during the campaign of 1912 +the excitement was so great that Woodrow Wilson +said on the stump he felt like apologizing to +the American people for daring to be a presidential +candidate while the Giants and the Red Sox +were playing for the championship. Baseball +(not so much for those who play it), is a colossal +phenomenon in American life. Watch the crowds +in front of a bulletin board, finding a vicarious +excitement and an abstract relief from the monotony +of their own lives. What a second-hand +civilization it is that grows passionate over a +scoreboard with little electric lights! What a civilization +it is that has learned to enjoy its sport +without even seeing it! If ever there was a symptom +that this nation needed leisure and direct +participation in games, it is that poor scrawny +substitute for joy--the baseball extra.</p> + +<p>It is as symptomatic as the labor union. It expresses +need. And statesmanship would find an +answer. It would not let that passion and loyalty +be frittered away to drift like scum through the +nation. It would see in it the opportunity of art, +play, and religion. So with what looks very different--the +"syndicalist movement." Perhaps it +seems preposterous to discuss baseball and syndicalism +in the same paragraph. But that is only +because we have not accustomed ourselves to +thinking of social events as answers to human +needs. The statesman would ask, Why are there +syndicalists? What are they driving at? What +gift to civilization is in the impetus behind them? +They are human beings, and they want human +things. There is no reason to become terror-stricken +about them. They seem to want things +badly. Then ostriches disguised as judges cannot +deal with them. Anarchism--men die for that, +they undergo intolerable insults. They are tarred +and feathered and spat upon. Is it possible that +Republicans, Democrats and Socialists clip the +wings more than free spirits can allow? Is civilization +perhaps too tightly organized? Have +the irreconcilables a soul audacious and less +blunted than our domesticated ones? To put it +mildly, is it ever safe to ignore them entirely in +our thinking?</p> + +<p>We shall come, I think, to a different appraisal +of agitations. Our present method is to discuss +whether the proposals are right and feasible. +We do this hastily and with prejudice. Generally +we decide that any agitation foreign to our settled +habits is wrong. And we bolster up our satisfaction +by pointing to some mistake of logic or some +puerility of statement. That done, we feel the +agitation is deplorable and can be ignored unless +it becomes so obstreperous that we have to put it +in jail. But a genuine statecraft would go deeper. +It would know that even God has been defended +with nonsense. So it could be sympathetic to agitations. +I use the word sympathetic literally. For +it would try to understand the inner feeling which +had generated what looks like a silly demand. +To-day it is as if a hungry man asked for an indigestible +food, and we let him go hungry because +he was unwise. He isn't any the less hungry because +he asks for the wrong food. So with agitations. +Their specific plans may be silly, but +their demands are real. The hungers and lusts +of mankind have produced some stupendous follies, +but the desires themselves are no less real +and insistent.</p> + +<p>The important thing about a social movement +is not its stated platform but the source from +which it flows. The task of politics is to understand +those deeper demands and to find civilized +satisfactions for them. The meaning of this is +that the statesman must be more than the leader +of a party. Thus the socialist statesman is not +complete if he is a good socialist. Only the delusion +that his truth is the whole truth, his party +the human race, and his program a panacea, will +produce that singleness of vision.</p> + +<p>The moment a man takes office he has no right +to be the representative of one group alone. He +has assumed the burden of harmonizing particular +agitations with the general welfare. That is +why great agitators should not accept office. Men +like Debs understand that. Their business is to +make social demands so concrete and pressing that +statesmen are forced to deal with them. Agitators +who accept government positions are a disappointment +to their followers. They can no +longer be severely partisan. They have to look +at affairs nationally. Now the agitator and the +statesman are both needed. But they have different +functions, and it is unjust to damn one because +he hasn't the virtues of the other.</p> + +<p>The statesman to-day needs a large equipment. +The man who comes forward to shape a country's +policy has truly no end of things to consider. He +must be aware of the condition of the people: no +statesman must fall into the sincere but thoroughly +upper class blunder that President Taft +committed when he advised a three months' vacation. +Realizing how men and women feel at +all levels and at different places, he must speak +their discontent and project their hopes. Through +this he will get power. Standing upon the prestige +which that gives he must guide and purify +the social demands he finds at work. He is the +translator of agitations. For this task he must +be keenly sensitive to public opinion and capable +of understanding the dynamics of it. Then, in order +to fuse it into a civilized achievement, he will +require much expert knowledge. Yet he need not +be a specialist himself, if only he is expert in +choosing experts. It is better indeed that the +statesman should have a lay, and not a professional +view. For the bogs of technical stupidity +and empty formalism are always near and always +dangerous. The real political genius stands +between the actual life of men, their wishes and +their needs, and all the windings of official caste +and professional snobbery. It is his supreme +business to see that the servants of life stay in +their place--that government, industry, "causes," +science, all the creatures of man do not succeed in +their perpetual effort to become the masters.</p> + +<p>I have Roosevelt in mind. He haunts political +thinking. And indeed, why shouldn't he? What +reality could there be in comments upon American +politics which ignored the colossal phenomenon of +Roosevelt? If he is wholly evil, as many say he +is, then the American democracy is preponderantly +evil. For in the first years of the Twentieth +Century, Roosevelt spoke for this nation, as few +presidents have spoken in our history. And +that he has spoken well, who in the perspective +of time will deny? Sensitive to the original forces +of public opinion, no man has had the same power +of rounding up the laggards. Government under +him was a throbbing human purpose. He succeeded, +where Taft failed, in preventing that drought of +invention which officialism brings. Many people +say he has tried to be all things to all men--that +his speeches are an attempt to corral all sorts of +votes. That is a left-handed way of stating a +truth. A more generous interpretation would be +to say that he had tried to be inclusive, to attach +a hundred sectional agitations to a national program. +Crude: of course he was crude; he had a +hemisphere for his canvas. Inconsistent: yes, he +tried to be the leader of factions at war with one +another. A late convert: he is a statesman and +not an agitator--his business was to meet demands +when they had grown to national proportions. +No end of possibilities have slipped +through the large meshes of his net. He has said +some silly things. He has not been subtle, and he +has been far from perfect. But his success should +be judged by the size of his task, by the fierceness +of the opposition, by the intellectual qualities of +the nation he represented. When we remember +that he was trained in the Republican politics of +Hanna and Platt, that he was the first President +who shared a new social vision, then I believe we +need offer no apologies for making Mr. Roosevelt +stand as the working model for a possible +American statesman at the beginning of the +Twentieth Century.</p> + +<p>Critics have often suggested that Roosevelt +stole Bryan's clothes. That is perhaps true, and +it suggests a comparison which illuminates both +men. It would not be unfair to say that it is always +the function of the Roosevelts to take from +the Bryans. But it is a little silly for an agitator +to cry thief when the success of his agitation has +led to the adoption of his ideas. It is like the +chagrin of the socialists because the National Progressive +Party had "stolen twenty-three planks," +and it makes a person wonder whether some agitators +haven't an overdeveloped sense of private +property.</p> + +<p>I do not see the statesman in Bryan. He has +been something of a voice crying in the wilderness, +but a voice that did not understand its own +message. Many people talk of him as a prophet. +There is a great deal of literal truth in that remark, +for it has been the peculiar work of Bryan +to express in politics some of that emotion which +has made America the home of new religions. +What we know as the scientific habit of mind is +entirely lacking in his intellectual equipment. +There is a vein of mysticism in American life, +and Mr. Bryan is its uncritical prophet. His insights +are those of the gifted evangelist, often +profound and always narrow. It is absurd to +debate his sincerity. Mr. Bryan talks with the +intoxication of the man who has had a revelation: +to skeptics that always seems theatrical. But +far from being the scheming hypocrite his enemies +say he is, Mr. Bryan is too simple for the +task of statesmanship. No bracing critical atmosphere +plays about his mind: there are no +cleansing doubts and fruitful alternatives. The +work of Bryan has been to express a certain feeling +of unrest--to embody it in the traditional language +of prophecy. But it is a shrewd turn of the +American people that has kept him out of office. +I say this not in disrespect of his qualities, but in +definition of them. Bryan does not happen to +have the naturalistic outlook, the complete humanity, +or the deliberative habit which modern +statecraft requires. He is the voice of a confused +emotion.</p> + +<p>Woodrow Wilson has a talent which is Bryan's +chief defect--the scientific habit of holding facts +in solution. His mind is lucid and flexible, and +he has the faculty of taking advice quickly, of +stating something he has borrowed with more +ease and subtlety than the specialist from whom +he got it. Woodrow Wilson's is an elegant and +highly refined intellect, nicely balanced and capable +of fine adjustment. An urbane civilization +produced it, leisure has given it spaciousness, ease +has made it generous. A mind without tension, +its roots are not in the somewhat barbarous under-currents +of the nation. Woodrow Wilson understands +easily, but he does not incarnate: he +has never been a part of the protest he speaks. +You think of him as a good counsellor, as an excellent +presiding officer. Whether his imagination +is fibrous enough to catch the inwardness of +the mutterings of our age is something experience +alone can show. Wilson has class feeling in the +least offensive sense of that term: he likes a world +of gentlemen. Occasionally he has exhibited a +rather amateurish effort to be grimy and shirt-sleeved. +But without much success: his contact +with American life is not direct, and so he is capable +of purely theoretical affirmations. Like all +essentially contemplative men, the world has to +be reflected in the medium of his intellect before +he can grapple with it.</p> + +<p>Yet Wilson belongs among the statesmen, and +it is fine that he should be in public life. The +weakness I have suggested is one that all statesmen +share in some degree: an inability to interpret +adequately the world they govern. This is +a difficulty which is common to conservative and +radical, and if I have used three living men to illustrate +the problem it is only because they seem +to illuminate it. They have faced the task and +we can take their measurement. It is no part of +my purpose to make any judgment as to the value +of particular policies they have advocated. I am +attempting to suggest some of the essentials of a +statesman's equipment for the work of a humanly +centered politics. Roosevelt has seemed to me +the most effective, the most nearly complete; +Bryan I have ventured to class with the men who +though important to politics should never hold +high executive office; Wilson, less complete than +Roosevelt, is worthy of our deepest interest because +his judgment is subtle where Roosevelt's is +crude. He is a foretaste of a more advanced +statesmanship.</p> + +<p>Because he is self-conscious, Wilson has been +able to see the problem that any finely adapted +statecraft must meet. It is a problem that would +hardly occur to an old-fashioned politician: +"Though he (the statesman) cannot himself keep +the life of the nation as a whole in his mind, he +can at least make sure that he is taking counsel +with those who know...." It is not important +that Wilson in stating the difficulty should +put it as if he had in a measure solved it. He +hasn't, because taking counsel is a means to understanding +the nation as a whole, and that understanding +remains almost as arduous and requires +just as fibrous an imagination, if it is +gleaned from advisers.</p> + +<p>To think of the whole nation: surely the task +of statesmanship is more difficult to-day than ever +before in history. In the face of a clotted intricacy +in the subject-matter of politics, improvements +in knowledge seem meager indeed. The +distance between what we know and what we need +to know appears to be greater than ever. Plato +and Aristotle thought in terms of ten thousand +homogeneous villagers; we have to think in terms +of a hundred million people of all races and all +traditions, crossbred and inbred, subject to climates +they have never lived in before, plumped +down on a continent in the midst of a strange +civilization. We have to deal with all grades of +life from the frontier to the metropolis, with men +who differ in sense of fact, in ideal, in the very +groundwork of morals. And we have to take +into account not the simple opposition of two +classes, but the hostility of many,--the farmers +and the factory workers and all the castes within +their ranks, the small merchants, and the feudal +organization of business. Ours is a problem in +which deception has become organized and +strong; where truth is poisoned at its source; one +in which the skill of the shrewdest brains is devoted +to misleading a bewildered people. Nor +can we keep to the problem within our borders. +Whether we wish it or not we are involved in the +world's problems, and all the winds of heaven +blow through our land.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>It is a great question whether our intellects can +grasp the subject. Are we perhaps like a child +whose hand is too small to span an octave on the +piano? Not only are the facts inhumanly complicated, +but the natural ideals of people are so +varied and contradictory that action halts in despair. +We are putting a tremendous strain upon +the mind, and the results are all about us: everyone +has known the neutral thinkers who stand +forever undecided before the complications of +life, who have, as it were, caught a glimpse of +the possibilities of knowledge. The sight has +paralyzed them. Unless they can act with certainty, +they dare not act at all.</p> + +<p>That is merely one of the temptations of theory. +In the real world, action and thought are so +closely related that one cannot wait upon the +other. We cannot wait in politics for any completed +theoretical discussion of its method: it is +a monstrous demand. There is no pausing until +political psychology is more certain. We have to +act on what we believe, on half-knowledge, illusion +and error. Experience itself will reveal our +mistakes; research and criticism may convert them +into wisdom. But act we must, and act as if we +knew the nature of man and proposed to satisfy +his needs.</p> + +<p>In other words, we must put man at the center +of politics, even though we are densely ignorant +both of man and of politics. This has always +been the method of great political thinkers from +Plato to Bentham. But one difference we in this +age must note: they made their political man a +dogma--we must leave him an hypothesis. That +is to say that our task is to temper speculation +with scientific humility.</p> + +<p>A paradox there is here, but a paradox of language, +and not of fact. Men made bridges before +there was a science of bridge-building; they +cured disease before they knew medicine. Art +came before æsthetics, and righteousness before +ethics. Conduct and theory react upon each +other. Hypothesis is confirmed and modified by +action, and action is guided by hypothesis. If it +is a paradox to ask for a human politics before +we understand humanity or politics, it is what +Mr. Chesterton describes as one of those paradoxes +that sit beside the wells of truth.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>We make our picture of man, knowing that, +though it is crude and unjust, we have to work +with it. If we are wise we shall become experimental +towards life: then every mistake will +contribute towards knowledge. Let the exploration +of human need and desire become a deliberate +purpose of statecraft, and there is no present +measure of its possibilities.</p> + +<p>In this work there are many guides. A vague +common tradition is in the air about us--it expresses +itself in journalism, in cheap novels, in +the uncritical theater. Every merchant has his +stock of assumptions about the mental habits of +his customers and competitors; the prostitute +hers; the newspaperman his; P. T. Barnum had +a few; the vaudeville stage has a number. We +test these notions by their results, and even +"practical people" find that there is more variety +in human nature than they had supposed.</p> + +<p>We forge gradually our greatest instrument +for understanding the world--introspection. We +discover that humanity may resemble us very considerably--that +the best way of knowing the inwardness +of our neighbors is to know ourselves. +For after all, the only experience we really understand +is our own. And that, in the least of us, +is so rich that no one has yet exhausted its possibilities. +It has been said that every genuine +character an artist produces is one of the characters +he might have been. By re-creating our +own suppressed possibilities we multiply the number +of lives that we can really know. That as +I understand it is the psychology of the Golden +Rule. For note that Jesus did not set up some +external fetich: he did not say, make your neighbor +righteous, or chaste, or respectable. He said +do as you would be done by. Assume that you +and he are alike, and you can found morals on +humanity.</p> + +<p>But experience has enlarged our knowledge of +differences. We realize now that our neighbor +is not always like ourselves. Knowing how unjust +other people's inferences are when they concern +us, we have begun to guess that ours may +be unjust to them. Any uniformity of conduct +becomes at once an impossible ideal, and the +willingness to live and let live assumes high place +among the virtues. A puzzled wisdom remarks +that "it takes all sorts of people to make a +world," and half-protestingly men accept Bernard +Shaw's amendment, "Do not do unto others as +you would that they should do unto you. Their +tastes may not be the same."</p> + +<p>We learn perhaps that there is no contradiction +in speaking of "human nature" while admitting +that men are unique. For all deepening +of our knowledge gives a greater sense of common +likeness and individual variation. It is folly +to ignore either insight. But it is done constantly, +with no end of confusion as a result. +Some men have got themselves into a state where +the only view that interests them is the common +humanity of us all. Their world is not populated +by men and women, but by a Unity that is Permanent. +You might as well refuse to see any +differences between steam, water and ice because +they have common elements. And I have seen +some of these people trying to skate on steam. +Their brothers, blind in the other eye, go about +the world so sure that each person is entirely +unique, that society becomes like a row of packing +cases, each painted on the inside, and each containing +one ego and its own.</p> + +<p>Art enlarges experience by admitting us to the +inner life of others. That is not the only use of +art, for its function is surely greater and more +ultimate than to furnish us with a better knowledge +of human nature. Nor is that its only use +even to statecraft. I suggested earlier that art +enters politics as a "moral equivalent" for evil, +a medium by which barbarous lusts find civilized +expression. It is, too, an ideal for labor. But +my purpose here is not to attempt any adequate +description of the services of art. It is enough +to note that literature in particular elaborates +our insight into human life, and, therefore, enables +us to center our institutions more truly.</p> + +<p>Ibsen discovers a soul in Nora: the discovery is +absorbed into the common knowledge of the age. +Other Noras discover their own souls; the Helmers +all about us begin to see the person in the +doll. Plays and novels have indeed an overwhelming +political importance, as the "moderns" +have maintained. But it lies not in the preaching +of a doctrine or the insistence on some particular +change in conduct. That is a shallow and wasteful +use of the resources of art. For art can open +up the springs from which conduct flows. Its +genuine influence is on what Wells calls the +"hinterland," in a quickening of the sense of life.</p> + +<p>Art can really penetrate where most of us can +only observe. "I look and I think I see," writes +Bergson, "I listen and I think I hear, I examine +myself and I think I am reading the very depths +of my heart.... (But) my senses and my +consciousness ... give me no more than a +practical simplification of reality ... in +short, we do not see the actual things themselves; +in most cases we confine ourselves to reading the +labels affixed to them." Who has not known this +in thinking of politics? We talk of poverty and +forget poor people; we make rules for vagrancy--we +forget the vagrant. Some of our best-intentioned +political schemes, like reform colonies +and scientific jails, turn out to be inhuman tyrannies +just because our imagination does not penetrate +the sociological label. "We move amidst +generalities and symbols ... we live in a +zone midway between things and ourselves, external +to things, external also to ourselves." This +is what works of art help to correct: "Behind +the commonplace, conventional expression that +both reveals and conceals an individual mental +state, it is the emotion, the original mood, to +which they attain in its undefiled essence."</p> + +<p>This directness of vision fertilizes thought. +Without a strong artistic tradition, the life and +so the politics of a nation sink into a barren +routine. A country populated by pure logicians +and mathematical scientists would, I believe, produce +few inventions. For creation, even of scientific +truth, is no automatic product of logical thought +or scientific method, and it has been well said that +the greatest discoveries in science are brilliant +guesses on insufficient evidence. A nation must, so +to speak, live close to its own life, be intimate and +sympathetic with natural events. That is what +gives understanding, and justifies the observation +that the intuitions of scientific discovery and the +artist's perceptions are closely related. It is perhaps +not altogether without significance for us +that primitive science and poetry were indistinguishable. +Nor is it strange that latter-day research +should confirm so many sayings of the +poets. In all great ages art and science have enriched +each other. It is only eccentric poets and +narrow specialists who lock the doors. The +human spirit doesn't grow in sections.</p> + +<p>I shall not press the point for it would lead +us far afield. It is enough that we remember +the close alliance of art, science and politics in +Athens, in Florence and Venice at their zenith. +We in America have divorced them completely: +both art and politics exist in a condition of unnatural +celibacy. Is this not a contributing factor +to the futility and opacity of our political +thinking? We have handed over the government +of a nation of people to a set of lawyers, to a +class of men who deal in the most verbal and +unreal of all human attainments.</p> + +<p>A lively artistic tradition is essential to the +humanizing of politics. It is the soil in which +invention flourishes and the organized knowledge +of science attains its greatest reality. Let me +illustrate from another field of interests. The +religious investigations of William James were +a study, not of ecclesiastical institutions or the +history of creeds. They were concerned with +religious experience, of which churches and rituals +are nothing but the external satisfaction. As +Graham Wallas is endeavoring to make human +nature the center of politics, so James made it +the center of religions. It was a work of genius, +yet no one would claim that it is a mature +psychology of the "Varieties of Religious Experience." +It is rather a survey and a description, +done with the eye of an artist and the method +of a scientist. We know from it more of what +religious feeling is like, even though we remain +ignorant of its sources. And this intimacy humanizes +religious controversy and brings ecclesiasticism +back to men.</p> + +<p>Like most of James's psychology, it opens up +investigation instead of concluding it. In the light +even of our present knowledge we can see how +primitive his treatment was. But James's services +cannot be overestimated: if he did not lay +even the foundations of a science, he did lay some +of the foundations for research. It was an immense +illumination and a warming of interest. It +threw open the gates to the whole landscape of +possibilities. It was a ventilation of thought. +Something similar will have to be done for political +psychology. We know how far off is the +profound and precise knowledge we desire. But +we know too that we have a right to hope for +an increasing acquaintance with the varieties of +political experience. It would, of course, be drawn +from biography, from the human aspect of history +and daily observation. We should begin to +know what it is that we ought to know. Such a +work would be stimulating to politician and psychologist. +The statesman's imagination would +be guided and organized; it would give him a +starting-point for his own understanding of human +beings in politics. To the scientists it would be +a challenge--to bring these facts under the light +of their researches, to extend these researches to +the borders of those facts.</p> + +<p>The statesman has another way of strengthening +his grip upon the complexity of life. Statistics +help. This method is neither so conclusive as +the devotees say, nor so bad as the people who +are awed by it would like to believe. Voting, as +Gabriel Tarde points out, is our most conspicuous +use of statistics. Mystical democrats believe that +an election expresses the will of the people, and +that that will is wise. Mystical democrats are +rare. Looked at closely an election shows the +quantitative division of the people on several +alternatives. That choice is not necessarily wise, +but it is wise to heed that choice. For it is a +rough estimate of an important part of the community's +sentiment, and no statecraft can succeed +that violates it. It is often immensely suggestive +of what a large number of people are in the future +going to wish. Democracy, because it registers +popular feeling, is at least trying to build truly, +and is for that reason an enlightened form of +government. So we who are democrats need not +believe that the people are necessarily right in +their choice: some of us are always in the minority, +and not a little proud of the distinction. Voting +does not extract wisdom from multitudes: its real +value is to furnish wisdom about multitudes. Our +faith in democracy has this very solid foundation: +that no leader's wisdom can be applied unless the +democracy comes to approve of it. To govern +a democracy you have to educate it: that contact +with great masses of men reciprocates by educating +the leader. "The consent of the governed" +is more than a safeguard against ignorant tyrants: +it is an insurance against benevolent despots as +well. In a rough way and with many exceptions, +democracy compels law to approximate human +need. It is a little difficult to see this when you +live right in the midst of one. But in perspective +there can be little question that of all governments +democracy is the most relevant. Only humane +laws can be successfully enforced; and they +are the only ones really worth enforcing. Voting +is a formal method of registering consent.</p> + +<p>But all statistical devices are open to abuse and +require constant correction. Bribery, false counting, +disfranchisement are the cruder deceptions; +they correspond to those enrolment statistics of +a large university which are artificially fed by +counting the same student several times if his +courses happen to span two or three of the departments. +Just as deceptive as plain fraud is +the deceptive ballot. We all know how when the +political tricksters were compelled to frame a +direct primary law in New York they fixed the +ballot so that it botched the election. Corporations +have been known to do just that to their +reports. Did not E. H. Harriman say of a well-known +statistician that he could make an annual +report tell any story you pleased? Still subtler +is the seven-foot ballot of stupid, good intentions--the +hyperdemocratic ballot in which you are +asked to vote for the State Printer, and succeed +only in voting under the party emblem.</p> + +<p>Statistics then is no automatic device for +measuring facts. You and I are forever at the +mercy of the census-taker and the census-maker. +That impertinent fellow who goes from house to +house is one of the real masters of the statistical +situation. The other is the man who organizes +the results. For all the conclusions in the end +rest upon their accuracy, honesty, energy and insight. +Of course, in an obvious census like that +of the number of people personal bias counts for +so little that it is lost in the grand total. But +the moment you begin inquiries into subjects +which people prefer to conceal, the weakness of +statistics becomes obvious. All figures which +touch upon sexual subjects are nothing but the +roughest guesses. No one would take a census +of prostitution, illegitimacy, adultery, or venereal +disease for a statement of reliable facts. There +are religious statistics, but who that has traveled +among men would regard the number of professing +Christians as any index of the strength of +Christianity, or the church attendance as a measure +of devotion? In the supremely important +subject of literacy, what classification yet devised +can weigh the culture of masses of people? We +say that such a percentage of the population cannot +read or write. But the test of reading and +writing is crude and clumsy. It is often administered +by men who are themselves half-educated, +and it is shot through with racial and class prejudice.</p> + +<p>The statistical method is of use only to those +who have found it out. This is achieved principally +by absorbing into your thinking a lively +doubt about all classifications and general terms, +for they are the basis of statistical measurement. +That done you are fairly proof against seduction. +No better popular statement of this is to +be found than H. G. Wells' little essay: "Skepticism +of the Instrument." Wells has, of course, +made no new discovery. The history of philosophy +is crowded with quarrels as to how seriously +we ought to take our classifications: a large part +of the battle about Nominalism turns on this, +the Empirical and Rational traditions divide on +it; in our day the attacks of James, Bergson, and +the "anti-intellectualists" are largely a continuation +of this old struggle. Wells takes his stand +very definitely with those who regard classification +"as serviceable for the practical purposes of +life" but nevertheless "a departure from the objective +truth of things."</p> + +<p>"Take the word chair," he writes. "When +one says chair, one thinks vaguely of an average +chair. But collect individual instances, think of +armchairs and reading-chairs, and dining-room +chairs and kitchen chairs, chairs that pass into +benches, chairs that cross the boundary and become +settees, dentists' chairs, thrones, opera stalls, +seats of all sorts, those miraculous fungoid +growths that cumber the floor of the Arts and +Crafts Exhibition, and you will perceive what +a lax bundle in fact is this simple straightforward +term. In co-operation with an intelligent joiner +I would undertake to defeat any definition of +chair or chairishness that you gave me." Think +then of the glib way in which we speak of "the +unemployed," "the unfit," "the criminal," "the +unemployable," and how easily we forget that +behind these general terms are unique individuals +with personal histories and varying needs.</p> + +<p>Even the most refined statistics are nothing but +an abstraction. But if that truth is held clearly +before the mind, the polygons and curves of the +statisticians can be used as a skeleton to which +the imagination and our general sense of life give +some flesh and blood reality. Human statistics +are illuminating to those who know humanity. I +would not trust a hermit's inferences about the +statistics of anything.</p> + +<p>It is then no simple formula which answers our +question. The problem of a human politics is +not solved by a catch phrase. Criticism, of which +these essays are a piece, can give the direction we +must travel. But for the rest there is no smooth +road built, no swift and sure conveyance at the +door. We set out as if we knew; we act on the +notions of man that we possess. Literature refines, +science deepens, various devices extend it. +Those who act on the knowledge at hand are the +men of affairs. And all the while, research studies +their results, artists express subtler perceptions, +critics refine and adapt the general culture of the +times. There is no other way but through this +vast collaboration.</p> + +<p>There is no short cut to civilization. We say +that the truth will make us free. Yes, but that +truth is a thousand truths which grow and change. +Nor do I see a final state of blessedness. The +world's end will surely find us still engaged in +answering riddles. This changing focus in politics +is a tendency at work all through our lives. There +are many experiments. But the effort is half-conscious; +only here and there does it rise to a +deliberate purpose. To make it an avowed ideal--a +thing of will and intelligence--is to hasten its +coming, to illumine its blunders, and, by giving it +self-criticism, to convert mistakes into wisdom.</p> + + +<br><br><br> + +<h2><a name="ch5">CHAPTER V</a></h2> +<h3>WELL MEANING BUT UNMEANING: THE CHICAGO<br /> +VICE REPORT</h3> +<br> + +<p>In casting about for a concrete example to illustrate +some of the points under discussion I +hesitated a long time before the wealth of material. +No age has produced such a multitude of +elaborate studies, and any selection was, of course, +a limiting one. The Minority Report of the English +Poor Law Commission has striking merits +and defects, but for our purposes it inheres too +deeply in British conditions. American tariff and +trust investigations are massive enough in all +conscience, but they are so partisan in their origin +and so pathetically unattached to any recognized +ideal of public policy that it seemed better to look +elsewhere. Conservation had the virtue of arising +out of a provident statesmanship, but its +problems were largely technical.</p> + +<p>The real choice narrowed itself finally to the +Pittsburgh Survey and the Chicago Vice Report. +Had I been looking for an example of the finest +expert inquiry, there would have been little question +that the vivid and intensive study of Pittsburgh's +industrialism was the example to use. But +I was looking for something more representative, +and, therefore, more revealing. I did not want +a detached study of some specially selected cross-section +of what is after all not the typical economic +life of America. The case demanded was +one in which you could see representative American +citizens trying to handle a problem which +had touched their imaginations.</p> + +<p>Vice is such a problem. You can always get +a hearing about it; there is no end of interest +in the question. Rare indeed is that community +which has not been "Lexowed," in which a district +attorney or a minister has not led a crusade. +Muckraking began with the exposure of vice; +men like Heney, Lindsey, Folk founded their +reputations on the fight against it. It would be +interesting to know how much of the social conscience +of our time had as its first insight the +prostitute on the city pavement.</p> + +<p>We do not have to force an interest, as we do +about the trusts, or even about the poor. For +this problem lies close indeed to the dynamics of +our own natures. Research is stimulated, actively +aroused, and a passionate zeal suffuses what is +perhaps the most spontaneous reform enthusiasm +of our time. Looked at externally it is a curious +focusing of attention. Nor is it explained by +words like "chivalry," "conscience," "social compassion." +Magazines that will condone a thousand +cruelties to women gladly publish series of +articles on the girl who goes wrong; merchants +who sweat and rack their women employees serve +gallantly on these commissions. These men are +not conscious hypocrites. Perhaps like the rest +of us they are impelled by forces they are not +eager to examine. I do not press the point. It +belongs to the analyst of motive.</p> + +<p>We need only note the vast interest in the +subject--that it extends across class lines, and expresses +itself as an immense good-will. Perhaps +a largely unconscious absorption in a subject is +itself a sign of great importance. Surely vice +has a thousand implications that touch all of us +directly. It is closely related to most of the interests +of life--ramifying into industry, into the +family, health, play, art, religion. The miseries +it entails are genuine miseries--not points of +etiquette or infringements of convention. Vice +issues in pain. The world suffers for it. To +attack it is to attack as far-reaching and real a +problem as any that we human beings face.</p> + +<p>The Chicago Commission had no simple, easily +measured problem before it. At the very outset +the report confesses that an accurate count of the +number of prostitutes in Chicago could not be +reached. The police lists are obviously incomplete +and perhaps corrupt. The whole amorphous +field of clandestine vice will, of course, defeat any +census. But even public prostitution is so varied +that nobody can do better than estimate it roughly. +This point is worth keeping in mind, for it lights +up the remedies proposed. What the Commission +advocates is the constant repression and the +ultimate annihilation of a mode of life which refuses +discovery and measurement.</p> + +<p>The report estimates that there are five thousand +women in Chicago who devote their whole +time to the traffic; that the annual profits in that +one city alone are between fifteen and sixteen +million dollars a year. These figures are admittedly +low for they leave out all consideration +of occasional, or seasonal, or hidden prostitution. +It is only the nucleus that can be guessed at; the +fringe which shades out into various degrees of +respectability remains entirely unmeasured. Yet +these suburbs of the Tenderloin must always be +kept in mind; their population is shifting and +very elastic; it includes the unsuspected; and I am +inclined to believe that it is the natural refuge +of the "suppressed" prostitute. Moreover it defies +control.</p> + +<p>The 1012 women recognized on the police lists +are of course the most easily studied. From them +we can gather some hint of the enormous bewildering +demand that prostitution answers. The +Commission informs us that this small group alone +receives over fifteen thousand visits a day--five +million and a half in the year. Yet these 1012 +women are only about one-fifth of the professional +prostitutes in Chicago. If the average continues, +then the figures mount to something over +27,000,000. The five thousand professionals do +not begin to represent the whole illicit traffic of +a city like Chicago. Clandestine and occasional +vice is beyond all measurement.</p> + +<p>The figures I have given are taken from the +report. They are said to be conservative. For +the purposes of this discussion we could well +lower the 27,000,000 by half. All I am concerned +about is in arriving at a sense of the +enormity of the impulse behind the "social evil." +For it is this that the Commission proposes to +repress, and ultimately to annihilate.</p> + +<p>Lust has a thousand avenues. The brothel, +the flat, the assignation house, the tenement, +saloons, dance halls, steamers, ice-cream parlors, +Turkish baths, massage parlors, street-walking--the +thing has woven itself into the texture of city +life. Like the hydra, it grows new heads, everywhere. +It draws into its service the pleasures +of the city. Entangled with the love of gaiety, +organized as commerce, it is literally impossible +to follow the myriad expressions it assumes.</p> + +<p>The Commission gives a very fair picture of +these manifestations. A mass of material is offered +which does in a way show where and how +and to what extent lust finds its illicit expression. +Deeper than this the report does not go. The +human impulses which create these social conditions, +the human needs to which they are a sad +and degraded answer--this human center of the +problem the commission passes by with a platitude.</p> + +<p>"So long as there is lust in the hearts of men," +we are told, "it will seek out some method of +expression. Until the hearts of men are changed +we can hope for no absolute annihilation of the +Social Evil." But at the head of the report in +black-faced type we read:</p> + +<p>"Constant and persistent repression of prostitution +the immediate method; absolute annihilation +the ultimate ideal."</p> + +<p>I am not trying to catch the Commissioners in +a verbal inconsistency. The inconsistency is real, +out of a deep-seated confusion of mind. Lust will +seek an expression, they say, until "the hearts of +men are changed." All particular expressions are +evil and must be constantly repressed. Yet though +you repress one form of lust, it will seek some +other. Now, says the Commission, in order to +change the hearts of men, religion and education +must step in. It is their business to eradicate an +impulse which is constantly changing form by +being "suppressed."</p> + +<p>There is only one meaning in this: the Commission +realized vaguely that repression is not +even the first step to a cure. For reasons worth +analyzing later, these representative American +citizens desired both the immediate taboo and +an ultimate annihilation of vice. So they fell +into the confusion of making immediate and detailed +proposals that have nothing to do with the +attainment of their ideal.</p> + +<p>What the commission saw and described were +the particular forms which a great human impulse +had assumed at a specific date in a certain +city. The dynamic force which created these conditions, +which will continue to create them--lust--they +refer to in a few pious sentences. Their +thinking, in short, is perfectly static and literally +superficial. In outlining a ripple they have forgotten +the tides.</p> + +<p>Had they faced the human sources of their +problem, had they tried to think of the social evil +as an answer to a human need, their researches +would have been different, their remedies fruitful. +Suppose they had kept in mind their own statement: +"so long as there is lust in the hearts of +men it will seek out some method of expression." +Had they held fast to that, it would have ceased +to be a platitude and have become a fertile idea. +For a platitude is generally inert wisdom.</p> + +<p>In the sentence I quote the Commissioners had +an idea which might have animated all their +labors. But they left it in limbo, they reverenced +it, and they passed by. Perhaps we can raise it +again and follow the hints it unfolds.</p> + +<p>If lust will seek an expression, are all expressions +of it necessarily evil? That the kind of +expression which the Commission describes is evil +no one will deny. But is it the only possible expression?</p> + +<p>If it is, then the taboo enforced by a Morals +Police is, perhaps, as good a way as any of gaining +a fictitious sense of activity. But the ideal of +"annihilation" becomes an irrelevant and meaningless +phrase. If lust is deeply rooted in men +and its only expression is evil, I for one should +recommend a faith in the millennium. You can +put this Paradise at the beginning of the world +or the end of it. Practical difference there is +none.</p> + +<p>No one can read the report without coming +to a definite conviction that the Commission regards +lust itself as inherently evil. The members +assumed without criticism the traditional dogma +of Christianity that sex in any manifestation outside +of marriage is sinful. But practical sense +told them that sex cannot be confined within marriage. +It will find expression--"some method of +expression" they say. What never occurred to +them was that it might find a good, a positively +beneficent method. The utterly uncriticised assumption +that all expressions not legalized are +sinful shut them off from any constructive answer +to their problem. Seeing prostitution or something +equally bad as the only way sex can find an +expression they really set before religion and education +the impossible task of removing lust "from +the hearts of men." So when their report puts +at its head that absolute annihilation of prostitution +is the ultimate ideal, we may well translate +it into the real intent of the Commission. What +is to be absolutely annihilated is not alone prostitution, +not alone all the methods of expression +which lust seeks out, but lust itself.</p> + +<p>That this is what the Commission had in mind +is supported by plenty of "internal evidence." +For example: one of the most curious recommendations +made is about divorce--"The Commission +condemns the ease with which divorces +may be obtained in certain States, and recommends +a stringent, uniform divorce law for all +States."</p> + +<p>What did the Commission have in mind? I +transcribe the paragraph which deals with divorce: +"The Vice Commission, after exhaustive +consideration of the vice question, records itself +of the opinion that divorce to a large extent is +a contributory factor to sexual vice. No study of +this blight upon the social and moral life of the +country would be comprehensive without consideration +of the causes which lead to the application +for divorce. These are too numerous to +mention at length in such a report as this, but +the Commission does wish to emphasize the great +need of more safeguards against the marrying of +persons physically, mentally and morally unfit to +take up the responsibilities of family life, including +the bearing of children."</p> + +<p>Now to be sure that paragraph leaves much to +be desired so far as clearness goes. But I think +the meaning can be extracted. Divorce is a contributory +factor to sexual vice. One way presumably +is that divorced women often become +prostitutes. That is an evil contribution, unquestionably. +The second sentence says that no study +of the social evil is complete which leaves out +the <i>causes</i> of divorce. One of those causes is, +I suppose, adultery with a prostitute. This evil +is totally different from the first: in one case +divorce contributes to prostitution, in the other, +prostitution leads to divorce. The third sentence +urges greater safeguards against undesirable marriages. +This prudence would obviously reduce +the need of divorce.</p> + +<p>How does the recommendation of a stringent +and uniform law fit in with these three statements? +A strict divorce law might be like New +York's: it would recognize few grounds for a +decree. One of those grounds, perhaps the chief +one, would be adultery. I say this unhesitatingly +for in another place the Commission informs us +that marriage has in it "the elements of vested +rights."</p> + +<p>A strict divorce law would, of course, diminish +the number of "divorced women," and perhaps +keep them out of prostitution. It does fit the +first statement--in a helpless sort of way. But +where does the difficulty of divorce affect the +causes of it? If you bind a man tightly to a +woman he does not love, and, possibly prevent him +from marrying one he does love, how do you +add to his virtue? And if the only way he can +free himself is by adultery, does not your stringent +divorce law put a premium upon vice? The third +sentence would make it difficult for the unfit to +marry. Better marriages would among other +blessings require fewer divorces. But what of +those who are forbidden to marry? They are +unprovided for. And yet who more than they are +likely to find desire uncontrollable and seek some +other "method of expression"? With marriage +prohibited and prostitution tabooed, the Commission +has a choice between sterilization and--let +us say--other methods of expression.</p> + +<p>Make marriage difficult, divorce stringent, +prostitution impossible--is there any doubt that +the leading idea is to confine the sex impulse +within the marriage of healthy, intelligent, +"moral," and monogamous couples? For all the +other seekings of that impulse what has the Commission +to offer? Nothing. That can be asserted +flatly. The Commission hopes to wipe out prostitution. +But it never hints that the success of +its plan means vast alterations in our social life. +The members give the impression that they think +of prostitution as something that can be subtracted +from our civilization without changing the +essential character of its institutions. Yet who +that has read the report itself and put himself +into any imaginative understanding of conditions +can escape seeing that prostitution to-day is organic +to our industrial life, our marriage sanctions, +and our social customs? Low wages, +fatigue, and the wretched monotony of the factory--these +must go before prostitution can go. +And behind these stand the facts of woman's entrance +into industry--facts that have one source +at least in the general poverty of the family. And +that poverty is deeply bound up with the economic +system under which we live. In the man's problem, +the growing impossibility of early marriages +is directly related to the business situation. Nor +can we speak of the degradation of religion and +the arts, of amusement, of the general morale +of the people without referring that degradation +to industrial conditions.</p> + +<p>You cannot look at civilization as a row of +institutions each external to the other. They interpenetrate +and a change in one affects all the +others. To abolish prostitution would involve a +radical alteration of society. Vice in our cities is +a form of the sexual impulse--one of the forms +it has taken under prevailing social conditions. +It is, if you please, like the crops of a rude and +forbidding soil--a coarse, distorted thing though +living.</p> + +<p>The Commission studied a human problem and +left humanity out. I do not mean that the members +weren't deeply touched by the misery of these +thousands of women. You can pity the poor without +understanding them; you can have compassion +without insight. The Commissioners had a good +deal of sympathy for the prostitute's condition, +but for that "lust in the hearts of men," and +women we may add, for that, they had no sympathetic +understanding. They did not place themselves +within the impulse. Officially they remained +external to human desires. For what +might be called the <i>élan vital</i> of the problem they +had no patience. Certain sad results of the particular +"method of expression" it had sought out +in Chicago called forth their pity and their +horror.</p> + +<p>In short, the Commission did not face the +sexual impulse squarely. The report is an attempt +to deal with a sexual problem by disregarding +its source. There are almost a hundred +recommendations to various authorities--Federal, +State, county, city, police, educational and others. +I have attempted to classify these proposals under +four headings. There are those which mean +forcible repression of particular manifestations--the +taboos; there are the recommendations which +are purely palliative, which aim to abate some of +the horrors of existing conditions; there are a +few suggestions for further investigation; and, +finally, there are the inventions, the plans which +show some desire to find moral equivalents for +evil--the really statesmanlike offerings.</p> + +<p>The palliative measures we may pass by quickly. +So long as they do not blind people to the necessity +for radical treatment, only a doctrinaire +would object to them. Like all intelligent charities +they are still a necessary evil. But nothing +must be staked upon them, so let us turn at once +to the constructive suggestions: The Commission +proposes that the county establish a "Permanent +Committee on Child Protection." It makes no +attempt to say what that protection shall be, but +I think it is only fair to let the wish father the +thought, and regard this as an effort to give +children a better start in life. The separation of +delinquent from semi-delinquent girls is a somewhat +similar attempt to guard the weak. Another +is the recommendation to the city and the nation +that it should protect arriving immigrants, and +if necessary escort them to their homes. This +surely is a constructive plan which might well be +enlarged from mere protection to positive hospitality. +How great a part the desolating loneliness +of a city plays in seductions the individual +histories in the report show. Municipal dance +halls are a splendid proposal. Freed from a cold +and over-chaperoned respectability they compete +with the devil. There, at least, is one method of +sexual expression which may have positively beneficent +results. A municipal lodging house for +women is something of a substitute for the +wretched rented room. A little suggestion to the +police that they send home children found on the +streets after nine o'clock has varied possibilities. +But there is the seed of an invention in it which +might convert the police from mere agents of repression +to kindly helpers in the mazes of a city. +The educational proposals are all constructive: +the teaching of sex hygiene is guardedly recommended +for consideration. That is entirely justified, +for no one can quarrel with a set of men +for leaving a question open. That girls from +fourteen to sixteen should receive vocational +training in continuation schools; that social centers +should be established in the public schools +and that the grounds should be open for children--all +of these are clearly additions to the positive +resource of the community. So is the suggestion +that church buildings be used for recreation. The +call for greater parental responsibility is, I fear, +a rather empty platitude, for it is not re-enforced +with anything but an ancient fervor.</p> + +<p>How much of this really seeks to create a fine +expression of the sexual impulse? How many of +these recommendations see sex as an instinct which +can be transmuted, and turned into one of the +values of life? The dance halls, the social centers, +the playgrounds, the reception of strangers--these +can become instruments for civilizing +sexual need. The educational proposals could +become ways of directing it. They could, but +will they? Without the habit of mind which sees +substitution as the essence of statecraft, without a +philosophy which makes the invention of moral +equivalents its goal, I for one refuse to see in +these recommendations anything more than a haphazard +shooting which has accidentally hit the +mark. Moreover, I have a deep suspicion that +I have tried to read into the proposals more than +the Commission intended. Certainly these constructions +occupy an insignificant amount of space +in the body of the report. On all sides of them +is a mass of taboos. No emotional appeal is +made for them as there is for the repressions. +They stand largely unnoticed, and very much undefined--poor +ghosts of the truth among the +gibbets.</p> + +<p>An inadvertent platitude--that lust will seek +an expression--and a few diffident proposals for +a finer environment--the need and its satisfaction: +had the Commission seen the relation of +these incipient ideas, animated it, and made it the +nerve center of the study, a genuine program +might have resulted. But the two ideas never +met and fertilized each other. Nothing dynamic +holds the recommendations together--the mass +of them are taboos, an attempt to kill each mosquito +and ignore the marsh. The evils of prostitution +are seen as a series of episodes, each of +which must be clubbed, forbidden, raided and +jailed.</p> + +<p>There is a special whack for each mosquito: +the laws about excursion boats should be enforced; +the owners should help to enforce them; there +should be more officers with police power on these +boats; the sale of liquor to minors should be +forbidden; gambling devices should be suppressed; +the midwives, doctors and maternity hospitals +practicing abortions should be investigated; employment +agencies should be watched and investigated; +publishers should be warned against +printing suspicious advertisements; the law against +infamous crimes should be made more specific; +any citizen should have the right to bring equity +proceedings against a brothel as a public nuisance; +there should be relentless prosecution of professional +procurers; there should be constant +prosecution of the keepers, inmates, and owners +of bawdy houses; there should be prosecution of +druggists who sells drugs and "certain appliances" +illegally; there should be an identification system +for prostitutes in the state courts; instead of fines, +prostitutes should be visited with imprisonment +or adult probation; there should be a penalty for +sending messenger boys under twenty-one to a +disorderly house or an unlicensed saloon; the law +against prostitutes in saloons, against wine-rooms +and stalls in saloons, against communication between +saloons and brothels, against dancing in +saloons--should be strictly enforced; the police +who enforce these laws should be carefully +watched, grafters amongst them should be discharged; +complaints should be investigated at +once by a man stationed outside the district; the +pressure of publicity should be brought against +the brewers to prevent them from doing business +with saloons that violate the law; the Retail +Liquor Association should discipline law-breaking +saloon-keepers: licenses should be permanently revoked +for violations; no women should be allowed +in a saloon without a male escort; no professional +or paid escorts should be permitted; no soliciting +should be allowed in saloons; no immoral or +vulgar dances should be permitted in saloons; no +intoxicating liquor should be allowed at any public +dance; there should be a municipal detention +home for women, with probation officers; police +inspectors who fail to report law-violations should +be dismissed; assignation houses should be suppressed +as soon as they are reported; there should +be a "special morals police squad"; recommendation +IX "to the Police" says they "should wage +a relentless warfare against houses of prostitution, +immoral flats, assignation rooms, call houses, +and disorderly saloons in all sections of the city"; +parks and playgrounds should be more thoroughly +policed; dancing pavilions should exclude professional +prostitutes; soliciting in parks should +be suppressed; parks should be lighted with a +searchlight; there should be no seats in the +shadows....</p> + +<p>To perform that staggering list of things that +"should" be done you find--what?--the police +power, federal, state, municipal. Note how +vague and general are the chance constructive suggestions; +how precise and definite the taboos. +Surely I am not misstating its position when I say +that forcible suppression was the creed of this +Commission. Nor is there any need of insisting +again that the ultimate ideal of annihilating prostitution +has nothing to expect from the concrete +proposals that were made. The millennial goal +was one thing; the immediate method quite another. +For ideals, a pious phrase; in practice, the +police.</p> + +<p>Are we not told that "if the citizens cannot +depend upon the men appointed to protect their +property, and to maintain order, then chaos and +disorganization resulting in vice and crime must +follow?" Yet of all the reeds that civilization +leans upon, surely the police is the frailest. Anyone +who has had the smallest experience of +municipal politics knows that the corruption of +the police is directly proportionate to the severity +of the taboos it is asked to enforce. Tom Johnson +saw this as Mayor of Cleveland; he knew that +strict law enforcement against saloons, brothels, +and gambling houses would not stop vice, but would +corrupt the police. I recommend the recent spectacle +in New York where the most sensational +raider of gambling houses has turned out to be +in crooked alliance with the gamblers. And I +suggest as a hint that the Commission's recommendations +enforced for one year will lay the +foundation of an organized system of blackmail +and "protection," secrecy and underground +chicanery, the like of which Chicago has not yet +seen. But the Commission need only have read +its own report, have studied its own cases. There +is an illuminating chapter on "The Social Evil +and the Police." In the summary, the Commission +says that "officers on the beat are bold and +open in their neglect of duty, drinking in saloons +while in uniform, ignoring the solicitations by +prostitutes in rear rooms and on the streets, selling +tickets at dances frequented by professional +and semi-professional prostitutes; protecting +'cadets,' prostitutes and saloon-keepers of disorderly +places."</p> + +<p>Some suspicion that the police could not carry +the burden of suppressing the social evil must have +dawned on the Commission.</p> + +<p>It felt the need of re-enforcement. Hence the +special morals police squad; hence the investigation +of the police of one district by the police +from another; and hence, in type as black as that +of the ideal itself and directly beneath it, the +call for "the appointment of a morals commission" +and "the establishment of a morals court." +Now this commission consists of the Health +Officer, a physician and three citizens who serve +without pay. It is appointed by the Mayor and +approved by the City Council. Its business is to +prosecute vice and to help enforce the law.</p> + +<p>Just what would happen if the Morals Commission +didn't prosecute hard enough I do not +know. Conceivably the Governor might be induced +to appoint a Commission on Moral Commissions +in Cities. But why the men and women +who framed the report made this particular recommendation +is an interesting question. With +federal, state, and municipal authorities in existence, +with courts, district attorneys, police all +operating, they create another arm of prosecution. +Possibly they were somewhat disillusioned +about the present instruments of the taboo; perhaps +they imagined that a new broom would +sweep clean. But I suspect an inner reason. The +Commission may have imagined that the four +appointees--unpaid--would be four men like +themselves--who knows, perhaps four men from +among themselves? The whole tenor of their +thinking is to set somebody watching everybody +and somebody else to watching him. What is +more natural than that they should be the Ultimate +Watchers?</p> + +<p>Spying, informing, constant investigations of +everybody and everything must become the rule +where there is a forcible attempt to moralize +society from the top. Nobody's heart is in the +work very long; nobody's but those fanatical and +morbid guardians of morality who make it a +life's specialty. The aroused public opinion which +the Commission asks for cannot be held if all it +has to fix upon is an elaborate series of taboos. +Sensational disclosures will often make the public +flare up spasmodically; but the mass of men is +soon bored by intricate rules and tangles of red +tape; the "crusade" is looked upon as a melodrama +of real life--interesting, but easily forgotten.</p> + +<p>The method proposed ignores the human +source: by a kind of poetic justice the great +crowd of men will ignore the method. If you +want to impose a taboo upon a whole community, +you must do it autocratically, you must make it +part of the prevailing superstitions. You must +never let it reach any public analysis. For it +will fail, it will receive only a shallow support +from what we call an "enlightened public +opinion." That opinion is largely determined by +the real impulses of men; and genuine character +rejects or at least rebels against foreign, unnatural +impositions. This is one of the great +virtues of democracy--that it makes alien laws +more and more difficult to enforce. The tyrant +can use the taboo a thousand times more effectively +than the citizens of a republic. When he +speaks, it is with a prestige that dumbs questioning +and makes obedience a habit. Let that infallibility +come to be doubted, as in Russia to-day, +and natural impulses reassert themselves, the +great impositions begin to weaken. The methods +of the Chicago Commission would require a +tyranny, a powerful, centralized sovereignty +which could command with majesty and silence the +rebel. In our shirt-sleeved republic no such +power exists. The strongest force we have is +that of organized money, and that sovereignty is +too closely connected with the social evil, too dependent +upon it in a hundred different ways, to +undertake the task of suppression.</p> + +<p>For the purposes of the Commission democracy +is an inefficient weapon. Nothing but disappointment +is in store for men who expect a people to +outrage its own character. A large part of the +unfaith in democracy, of the desire to ignore +"the mob," limit the franchise, and confine power +to the few is the result of an unsuccessful attempt +to make republics act like old-fashioned +monarchies. Almost every "crusade" leaves behind +it a trail of yearning royalists; many "good-government" +clubs are little would-be oligarchies.</p> + +<p>When the mass of men emerged from slavish +obedience and made democracy inevitable, the +taboo entered upon its final illness. For the more +self-governing a people becomes, the less possible +it is to prescribe external restrictions. The gap +between want and ought, between nature and +ideals cannot be maintained. The only practical +ideals in a democracy are a fine expression of +natural wants. This happens to be a thoroughly +Greek attitude. But I learned it first from the +Bowery. Chuck Connors is reported to have said +that "a gentleman is a bloke as can do whatever +he wants to do." If Chuck said that, he went +straight to the heart of that democratic morality +on which a new statecraft must ultimately rest. +His gentleman is not the battlefield of wants and +prohibitions; in him impulses flow freely through +beneficent channels.</p> + +<p>The same notion lies imbedded in the phrase: +"government must serve the people." That +means a good deal more than that elected officials +must rule for the majority. For the majority in +these semi-democratic times is often as not a +cloak for the ruling oligarchy. Representatives +who "serve" some majorities may in reality order +the nation about. To serve the people means +to provide it with services--with clean streets and +water, with education, with opportunity, with +beneficent channels for its desires, with moral +equivalents for evil. The task is turned from +the damming and restricting of wants to the creation +of fine environments for them. And the +environment of an impulse extends all the way +from the human body, through family life and +education out into the streets of the city.</p> + +<p>Had the Commission worked along democratic +lines, we should have had recommendations about +the hygiene and early training of children, their +education, the houses they live in and the streets +in which they play; changes would have been suggested +in the industrial conditions they face; plans +would have been drawn for recreation; hints +would have been collected for transmuting the +sex impulse into art, into social endeavor, into +religion. That is the constructive approach to +the problem. I note that the Commission calls +upon the churches for help. Its obvious intention +was to down sex with religion. What was not +realized, it seems, is that this very sex impulse, +so largely degraded into vice, is the dynamic force +in religious feeling. One need not call in the testimony +of the psychologists, the students of religion, +the æstheticians or even of Plato, who in +the "Symposium" traced out the hierarchy of love +from the body to the "whole sea of beauty." +Jane Addams in Chicago has tested the truth by +her own wide experience, and she has written +what the Commission might easily have read,--that +"in failing to diffuse and utilize this fundamental +instinct of sex through the imagination, we +not only inadvertently foster vice and enervation, +but we throw away one of the most precious implements +for ministering to life's highest needs. +There is no doubt that this ill-adjusted function +consumes quite unnecessarily vast stores of vital +energy, even when we contemplate it in its immature +manifestations which are infinitely more +wholesome than the dumb swamping process. All +high school boys and girls know the difference between +the concentration and the diffusion of this +impulse, although they would be hopelessly bewildered +by the use of terms. They will declare +one of their companions to be 'in love' if his +fancy is occupied by the image of a single person +about whom all the new-found values gather, and +without whom his solitude is an eternal melancholy. +But if the stimulus does not appear as a +definite image, and the values evoked are dispensed +over the world, the young person suddenly +seems to have discovered a beauty and significance +in many things--he responds to poetry, he becomes +a lover of nature, he is filled with religious +devotion or with philanthropic zeal. Experience, +with young people, easily illustrates the possibility +and value of diffusion."</p> + +<p>It is then not only impossible to confine sex to +mere reproduction; it would be a stupid denial of +the finest values of civilization. Having seen that +the impulse is a necessary part of character, we +must not hold to it grudgingly as a necessary evil. +It is, on the contrary, the very source of good. +Whoever has visited Hull House can see for himself +the earnest effort Miss Addams has made to +treat sex with dignity and joy. For Hull House +differs from most settlements in that it is full of +pictures, of color, and of curios. The atmosphere +is light; you feel none of that moral oppression +which hangs over the usual settlement as over a +gathering of missionaries. Miss Addams has not +only made Hull House a beautiful place; she has +stocked it with curious and interesting objects. +The theater, the museum, the crafts and the arts, +games and dances--they are some of those "other +methods of expression which lust can seek." It +is no accident that Hull House is the most successful +settlement in America.</p> + +<p>Yet who does not feel its isolation in that +brutal city? A little Athens in a vast barbarism--you +wonder how much of Chicago Hull House +can civilize. As you walk those grim streets and +look into the stifling houses, or picture the relentless +stockyards, the conviction that vice and +its misery cannot be transmuted by policemen and +Morals Commissions, the feeling that spying and +inspecting and prosecuting will not drain the +marsh becomes a certainty. You want to shout +at the forcible moralizer: "so long as you acquiesce +in the degradation of your city, so long +as work remains nothing but ill-paid drudgery +and every instinct of joy is mocked by dirt and +cheapness and brutality,--just so long will your +efforts be fruitless, yes even though you raid and +prosecute, even though you make Comstock the +Czar of Chicago."</p> + +<p>But Hull House cannot remake Chicago. A +few hundred lives can be changed, and for the +rest it is a guide to the imagination. Like all +utopias, it cannot succeed, but it may point the +way to success. If Hull House is unable to civilize +Chicago, it at least shows Chicago and +America what a civilization might be like. +Friendly, where our cities are friendless, beautiful, +where they are ugly; sociable and open, where +our daily life is furtive; work a craft; art a participation--it +is in miniature the goal of statesmanship. +If Chicago were like Hull House, we +say to ourselves, then vice would be no problem--it +would dwindle, what was left would be the +Falstaff in us all, and only a spiritual anemia +could worry over that jolly and redeeming coarseness.</p> + +<p>What stands between Chicago and civilization? +No one can doubt that to abolish prostitution +means to abolish the slum and the dirty +alley, to stop overwork, underpay, the sweating +and the torturing monotony of business, to +breathe a new life into education, ventilate society +with frankness, and fill life with play and art, +with games, with passions which hold and suffuse +the imagination.</p> + +<p>It is a revolutionary task, and like all real revolutions +it will not be done in a day or a decade +because someone orders it to be done. A change +in the whole quality of life is something that +neither the policeman's club nor an insurrectionary +raid can achieve. If you want a revolution +that shall really matter in human life--and what +sane man can help desiring it?--you must look to +the infinitely complicated results of the dynamic +movements in society. These revolutions require +a rare combination of personal audacity and social +patience. The best agents of such a revolution +are men who are bold in their plans because +they realize how deep and enormous is the task.</p> + +<p>Many people have sought an analogy in our +Civil War. They have said that as "black slavery" +went, so must "white slavery." In the +various agitations of vigilance committees and +alliances for the suppression of the traffic they +profess to see continued a work which the abolitionists +began.</p> + +<p>In A. M. Simons' brilliant book on "Social +Forces in American History" much help can be +found. For example: "Massachusetts abolished +slavery at an early date, and we have it on the +authority of John Adams that:--'argument +might have had some weight in the abolition of +slavery in Massachusetts, but the real cause was +the multiplication of laboring white people, who +would not longer suffer the rich to employ these +sable rivals so much to their injury.'" No one +to-day doubts that white labor in the North and +slavery in the South were not due to the moral +superiority of the North. Yet just in the North +we find the abolition sentiment strongest. That +the Civil War was not a clash of good men and +bad men is admitted by every reputable historian. +The war did not come when moral fervor had +risen to the exploding point; the moral fervor +came rather when the economic interests of the +South collided with those of the North. That +the abolitionists clarified the economic interests of +the North and gave them an ideal sanction is true +enough. But the fact remains that by 1860 some +of the aspirations of Phillips and Garrison had +become the economic destiny of this country.</p> + +<p>You can have a Hull House established by private +initiative and maintained by individual +genius, just as you had planters who freed their +slaves or as you have employers to-day who humanize +their factories. But the fine example is +not readily imitated when industrial forces fight +against it. So even if the Commission had drawn +splendid plans for housing, work conditions, education, +and play it would have done only part of +the task of statesmanship. We should then know +what to do, but not how to get it done.</p> + +<p>An ideal suspended in a vacuum is ineffective: +it must point a dynamic current. Only then does +it gather power, only then does it enter into life. +That forces exist to-day which carry with them +solutions is evident to anyone who has watched +the labor movement and the woman's awakening. +Even the interests of business give power to the +cause. The discovery of manufacturers that degradation +spoils industrial efficiency must not be +cast aside by the radical because the motive is +larger profits. The discovery, whatever the motive, +will inevitably humanize industry a good +deal. For it happens that in this case the interests +of capitalism and of humanity coincide. A +propaganda like the single-tax will undoubtedly +find increasing support among business men. +They see in it a relief from the burden of rent +imposed by that older tyrant--the landlord. But +the taxation of unimproved property happens at +the same time to be a splendid weapon against the +slum.</p> + +<p>Only when the abolition of "white slavery" becomes +part of the social currents of the time will +it bear any interesting analogy to the so-called +freeing of the slaves. Even then for many enthusiasts +the comparison is misleading. They are +likely to regard the Emancipation Proclamation +as the end of chattel slavery. It wasn't. That +historic document broke a legal bond but not a +social one. The process of negro emancipation is +infinitely slower and it is not accomplished yet. +Likewise no statute can end "white slavery." +Only vast and complicated changes in the whole +texture of social life will achieve such an end. If +by some magic every taboo of the commission +could be enforced the abolition of sex slavery +would not have come one step nearer to reality. +Cities and factories, schools and homes, theaters +and games, manners and thought will have to be +transformed before sex can find a better expression. +Living forces, not statutes or clubs, must +work that change. The power of emancipation is +in the social movements which alone can effect +any deep reform in a nation. So it is and has +been with the negro. I do not think the Abolitionists +saw facts truly when they disbanded their +organization a few years after the civil war. +They found too much comfort in a change of +legal status. Profound economic forces brought +about the beginning of the end of chattel slavery. +But the reality of freedom was not achieved by +proclamation. For that the revolution had to go +on: the industrial life of the nation had to change +its character, social customs had to be replaced, +the whole outlook of men had to be transformed. +And whether it is negro slavery or a vicious sexual +bondage, the actual advance comes from substitutions +injected into society by dynamic social forces.</p> + +<p>I do not wish to press the analogy or over-emphasize +the particular problems. I am not engaged +in drawing up the plans for a reconstruction +or in telling just what should be done. Only +the co-operation of expert minds can do that. +The place for a special propaganda is elsewhere. +If these essays succeed in suggesting a method of +looking at politics, if they draw attention to what +is real in social reforms and make somewhat more +evident the traps and the blind-alleys of an uncritical +approach, they will have done their work. +That the report of the Chicago Vice Commission +figures so prominently in this chapter is not due +to any preoccupation with Chicago, the Commission +or with vice. It is a text and nothing else. +The report happens to embody what I conceive +to be most of the faults of a political method now +decadent. Its failure to put human impulses at +the center of thought produced remedies valueless +to human nature; its false interest in a particular +expression of sex--vice--caused it to +taboo the civilizing power of sex; its inability to +see that wants require fine satisfactions and not +prohibitions drove it into an undemocratic +tyranny; its blindness to the social forces of our +age shut off the motive power for any reform.</p> + +<p>The Commission's method was poor, not its +intentions. It was an average body of American +citizens aroused to action by an obvious evil. But +something slipped in to falsify vision. It was, I +believe, an array of idols disguised as ideals. +They are typical American idols, and they deserve +some study.</p> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch6">CHAPTER VI</a></h2> + +<h3>SOME NECESSARY ICONOCLASM</h3> +<br> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The Commission "has kept constantly in mind +that to offer a contribution of any value such an +offering must be, first, moral; second, reasonable +and practical; third, possible under the Constitutional +powers of our Courts; fourth, that which +will square with the public conscience of the +American people."--The Vice Commission of +Chicago--Introduction to Report on the Social +Evil.</p></div> +<br> + +<p>Having adjusted such spectacles the Commission +proceeded to look at "this curse +which is more blasting than any plague or epidemic," +at an evil "which spells only ruin to the +race." In dealing with what it regards as the +greatest calamity in the world, a calamity as old +as civilization, the Commission lays it down beforehand +that the remedy must be "moral," constitutional, +and satisfactory to the public conscience. +I wonder in all seriousness what the +Commission would have done had it discovered +a genuine cure for prostitution which happened, +let us say, to conflict with the constitutional powers +of our courts. I wonder how the Commission +would have acted if a humble following of the +facts had led them to a conviction out of tune +with the existing public conscience of America. +Such a conflict is not only possible; it is highly +probable. When you come to think of it, the +conflict appears a certainty. For the Constitution +is a legal expression of the conditions under which +prostitution has flourished; the social evil is +rooted in institutions and manners which have +promoted it, in property relations and business +practice which have gathered about them a halo +of reason and practicality, of morality and conscience. +Any change so vast as the abolition of +vice is of necessity a change in morals, practice, +law and conscience.</p> + +<p>A scientist who began an investigation by saying +that his results must be moral or constitutional +would be a joke. We have had scientists like +that, men who insisted that research must confirm +the Biblical theory of creation. We have +had economists who set out with the preconceived +idea of justifying the factory system. The world +has recently begun to see through this kind of intellectual +fraud. If a doctor should appear who +offered a cure for tuberculosis on the ground that +it was justified by the Bible and that it conformed +to the opinions of that great mass of the American +people who believe that fresh air is the devil, +we should promptly lock up that doctor as a dangerous +quack. When the negroes of Kansas were +said to be taking pink pills to guard themselves +against Halley's Comet, they were doing something +which appeared to them as eminently practical +and entirely reasonable. Not long ago we +read of the savage way in which a leper was +treated out West; his leprosy was not regarded +as a disease, but as the curse of God, and, if I +remember correctly, the Bible was quoted in court +as an authority on leprosy. The treatment seemed +entirely moral and squared very well with the conscience +of that community.</p> + +<p>I have heard reputable physicians condemn a +certain method of psychotherapy because it was +"immoral." A woman once told me that she had +let her son grow up ignorant of his sexual life +because "a mother should never mention anything +'embarrassing' to her child." Many of us are +still blushing for the way America treated Gorki +when it found that Russian morals did not square +with the public conscience of America. And the +time is not yet passed when we punish the offspring +of illicit love, and visit vengeance unto the +third and fourth generations. One reads in the +report of the Vice Commission that many public +hospitals in Chicago refuse to care for venereal +diseases. The examples are endless. They run +from the absurd to the monstrous. But always +the source is the same. Idols are set up to which +all the living must bow; we decide beforehand +that things must fit a few preconceived ideas. And +when they don't, which is most of the time, we +deny truth, falsify facts, and prefer the coddling +of our theory to any deeper understanding of the +real problem before us.</p> + +<p>It seems as if a theory were never so active as +when the reality behind it has disappeared. The +empty name, the ghostly phrase, exercise an authority +that is appalling. When you think of the +blood that has been shed in the name of Jesus, +when you think of the Holy Roman Empire, +"neither holy nor Roman nor imperial," of the +constitutional phrases that cloak all sorts of thievery, +of the common law precedents that tyrannize +over us, history begins to look almost like the +struggle of man to emancipate himself from +phrase-worship. The devil can quote Scripture, +and law, and morality and reason and practicality. +The devil can use the public conscience of his +time. He does in wars, in racial and religious +persecutions; he did in the Spain of the Inquisition; +he does in the American lynching.</p> + +<p>For there is nothing so bad but it can masquerade +as moral. Conquerors have gone forth with +the blessing of popes; a nation invokes its God +before beginning a campaign of murder, rape and +pillage. The ruthless exploitation of India becomes +the civilizing fulfilment of the "white man's +burden"; not infrequently the missionary, drummer, +and prospector are embodied in one man. +In the nineteenth century church, press and university +devoted no inconsiderable part of their +time to proving the high moral and scientific justice +of child labor and human sweating. It is a +matter of record that chattel slavery in this country +was deduced from Biblical injunction, that the +universities furnished brains for its defense. +Surely Bernard Shaw was not describing the Englishman +alone when he said in "The Man of Destiny" +that "... you will never find an +Englishman in the wrong. He does everything +on principle. He fights you on patriotic principles; +he robs you on business principles...."</p> + +<p>Liberty, equality, fraternity--what a grotesque +career those words have had. Almost every attempt +to mitigate the hardships of industrialism +has had to deal with the bogey of liberty. Labor +organization, factory laws, health regulations are +still fought as infringements of liberty. And in +the name of equality what fantasies of taxation +have we not woven? what travesties of justice set +up? "The law in its majestic equality," writes +Anatole France, "forbids the rich as well as the +poor to sleep in the streets and to steal bread." +Fraternity becomes the hypocritical slogan by +which we refuse to enact what is called "class +legislation"--a policy which in theory denies the +existence of classes, in practice legislates in favor +of the rich. The laws which go unchallenged +are laws friendly to business; class legislation +means working-class legislation.</p> + +<p>You have to go among lawyers to see this idolatrous +process in its most perfect form. When a +judge sets out to "interpret" the Constitution, +what is it that he does? He takes a sentence +written by a group of men more than a hundred +years ago. That sentence expressed their policy +about certain conditions which they had to deal +with. In it was summed up what they intended +to do about the problems they saw. That is all +the sentence means. But in the course of a century +new problems arise--problems the Fathers +could no more have foreseen than we can foresee +the problems of the year two thousand. Yet that +sentence which contained their wisdom about particular +events has acquired an emotional force +which persists long after the events have passed +away. Legends gather about the men who wrote +it: those legends are absorbed by us almost with +our mothers' milk. We never again read that +sentence straight. It has a gravity out of all proportion +to its use, and we call it a fundamental +principle of government. Whatever we want to +do is hallowed and justified, if it can be made to +appear as a deduction from that sentence. To +put new wine in old bottles is one of the aims of +legal casuistry.</p> + +<p>Reformers practice it. You hear it said that +the initiative and referendum are a return to the +New England town meeting. That is supposed +to be an argument for direct legislation. But +surely the analogy is superficial; the difference +profound. The infinitely greater complexity of +legislation to-day, the vast confusion in the aims +of the voting population, produce a difference of +so great a degree that it amounts to a difference +in kind. The naturalist may classify the dog and +the fox, the house-cat and the tiger together for +certain purposes. The historian of political forms +may see in the town meeting a forerunner of direct +legislation. But no housewife dare classify +the cat and the tiger, the dog and the fox, as the +same kind of animal. And no statesman can +argue the virtues of the referendum from the successes +of the town meeting.</p> + +<p>But the propagandists do it nevertheless, and +their propaganda thrives upon it. The reason is +simple. The town meeting is an obviously respectable +institution, glorified by all the reverence +men give to the dead. It has acquired the seal of +an admired past, and any proposal that can borrow +that seal can borrow that reverence too. A +name trails behind it an army of associations. +That army will fight in any cause that bears the +name. So the reformers of California, the Lorimerites +of Chicago, and the Barnes Republicans +of Albany all use the name of Lincoln for their +political associations. In the struggle that preceded +the Republican Convention of 1912 it was +rumored that the Taft reactionaries would put +forward Lincoln's son as chairman of the convention +in order to counteract Roosevelt's claim that +he stood in Lincoln's shoes.</p> + +<p>Casuistry is nothing but the injection of your +own meaning into an old name. At school when +the teacher asked us whether we had studied the +lesson, the invariable answer was Yes. We had +indeed stared at the page for a few minutes, and +that could be called studying. Sometimes the +head-master would break into the room just in +time to see the conclusion of a scuffle. Jimmy's +clothes are white with dust. "Johnny, did you +throw chalk at Jimmy?" "No, sir," says Johnny, +and then under his breath to placate God's penchant +for truth, "I threw the chalk-eraser." Once +in Portland, Maine, I ordered iced tea at an hotel. +The waitress brought me a glass of yellowish +liquid with a two-inch collar of foam at the top. +No tea I had ever seen outside of a prohibition +state looked like that. Though it was tea, it +might have been beer. Perhaps if I had smiled +or winked in ordering the tea, it would have been +beer. The two looked alike in Portland; they +were interchangeable. You could drink tea and +fool yourself into thinking it was beer. You +could drink beer and pass for a tea-toper.</p> + +<p>It is rare, I think, that the fraud is so genial +and so deliberate. The openness cleanses it. Advertising, +for example, would be nothing but gigantic +and systematic lying if almost everybody +didn't know that it was. Yet it runs into the sinister +all the time. The pure food agitation is +largely an effort to make the label and the contents +tell the same story. It was noteworthy +that, following the discovery of salvarsan or +"606" by Dr. Ehrlich, the quack doctors began +to call their treatments "606." But the deliberate +casuistry of lawyers, quacks, or politicians is +not so difficult to deal with. The very deliberation +makes it easier to detect, for it is generally +awkward. What one man can consciously devise, +other men can understand.</p> + +<p>But unconscious casuistry deceives us all. No +one escapes it entirely. A wealth of evidence +could be adduced to support this from the studies +of dreams and fantasies made by the Freudian +school of psychologists. They have shown how +constantly the mind cloaks a deep meaning in a +shallow incident--how the superficial is all the +time being shoved into the light of consciousness +in order to conceal a buried intention; how inveterate +is our use of symbols.</p> + +<p>Between ourselves and our real natures we interpose +that wax figure of idealizations and selections +which we call our character. We extend +this into all our thinking. Between us and the +realities of social life we build up a mass of generalizations, +abstract ideas, ancient glories, and +personal wishes. They simplify and soften experience. +It is so much easier to talk of poverty +than to think of the poor, to argue the rights of +capital than to see its results. Pretty soon we +come to think of the theories and abstract ideas +as things in themselves. We worry about their +fate and forget their original content.</p> + +<p>For words, theories, symbols, slogans, abstractions +of all kinds are nothing but the porous vessels +into which life flows, is contained for a time, +and then passes through. But our reverence +clings to the vessels. The old meaning may have +disappeared, a new one come in--no matter, we +try to believe there has been no change. And +when life's expansion demands some new container, +nothing is more difficult than the realization +that the old vessels cannot be stretched to the +present need.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to notice how in the very act of +analyzing it I have fallen into this curious and +ancient habit. My point is that the metaphor is +taken for the reality: I have used at least six +metaphors to state it. Abstractions are not +cloaks, nor wax figures, nor walls, nor vessels, and +life doesn't flow like water. What they really are +you and I know inwardly by using abstractions +and living our lives. But once I attempt to give +that inwardness expression, I must use the only +weapons I have--abstractions, theories, phrases. +By an effort of the sympathetic imagination you +can revive within yourself something of my inward +sense. As I have had to abstract from life +in order to communicate, so you are compelled to +animate my abstractions, in order to understand.</p> + +<p>I know of no other method of communication +between two people. Language is always grossly +inadequate. It is inadequate if the listener is +merely passive, if he falls into the mistake of the +literal-minded who expect words to contain a precise +image of reality. They never do. All language +can achieve is to act as a guidepost to the +imagination enabling the reader to recreate the +author's insight. The artist does that: he controls +his medium so that we come most readily +to the heart of his intention. In the lyric poet the +control is often so delicate that the hearer lives +over again the finely shaded mood of the poet. +Take the words of a lyric for what they say, and +they say nothing most of the time. And that is +true of philosophers. You must penetrate the +ponderous vocabulary, the professional cant to +the insight beneath or you scoff at the mountain +ranges of words and phrases. It is this that +Bergson means when he tells us that a philosopher's +intuition always outlasts his system. Unless +you get at that you remain forever foreign to +the thinker.</p> + +<p>That too is why debating is such a wretched +amusement and most partisanship, most controversy, +so degrading. The trick here is to argue +from the opponent's language, never from his insight. +You take him literally, you pick up his +sentences, and you show what nonsense they are. +You do not try to weigh what you see against +what he sees; you contrast what you see with what +he says. So debating becomes a way of confirming +your own prejudices; it is never, never in any +debate I have suffered through, a search for understanding +from the angles of two differing insights.</p> + +<p>And, of course, in those more sinister forms of +debating, court trials, where the stakes are so +much bigger, the skill of a successful lawyer is to +make the atmosphere as opaque as possible to the +other lawyer's contention. Men have been +hanged as a result. How often in a political campaign +does a candidate suggest that behind the +platforms and speeches of his opponents there +might be some new and valuable understanding +of the country's need?</p> + +<p>The fact is that we argue and quarrel an +enormous lot over words. Our prevailing habit +is to think about phrases, "ideals," theories, not +about the realities they express. In controversy +we do not try to find our opponent's meaning: +we examine his vocabulary. And in our own efforts +to shape policies we do not seek out what is +worth doing: we seek out what will pass for +moral, practical, popular or constitutional.</p> + +<p>In this the Vice Commission reflected our national +habits. For those earnest men and women +in Chicago did not set out to find a way of abolishing +prostitution; they set out to find a way that +would conform to four idols they worshiped. +The only cure for prostitution might prove to be +"immoral," "impractical," unconstitutional, and +unpopular. I suspect that it is. But the honest +thing to do would have been to look for that +cure without preconceived notions. Having found +it, the Commission could then have said to the +public: "This is what will cure the social evil. It +means these changes in industry, sex relations, law +and public opinion. If you think it is worth the +cost you can begin to deal with the problem. If +you don't, then confess that you will not abolish +prostitution, and turn your compassion to softening +its effects."</p> + +<p>That would have left the issues clear and +wholesome. But the procedure of the Commission +is a blow to honest thinking. Its conclusions +may "square with the public conscience of the +American people" but they will not square with +the intellectual conscience of anybody. To tell +you at the top of the page that absolute annihilation +of prostitution is the ultimate ideal and +twenty lines further on that the method must be +constitutional is nothing less than an insult to the +intelligence. Calf-worship was never more idolatrous +than this. Truth would have slept more +comfortably in Procrustes' bed.</p> + +<p>Let no one imagine that I take the four preconceived +ideas of the Commission too seriously. On +the first reading of the report they aroused no +more interest in me than the ordinary lip-honor +we all do to conventionality--I had heard of the +great fearlessness of this report, and I supposed +that this bending of the knee was nothing but the +innocent hypocrisy of the reformer who wants to +make his proposal not too shocking. But it was +a mistake. Those four idols really dominated the +minds of the Commission, and without them the +report cannot be understood. They are typical +idols of the American people. This report offers +an opportunity to see the concrete results of worshiping +them.</p> + +<p>A valuable contribution, then, must be <i>moral</i>. +There is no doubt that the Commission means +sexually moral. We Americans always use the +word in that limited sense. If you say that Jones +is a moral man you mean that he is faithful to +his wife. He may support her by selling pink +pills; he is nevertheless moral if he is monogamous. +The average American rarely speaks of industrial +piracy as immoral. He may condemn it, +but not with that word. If he extends the meaning +of immoral at all, it is to the vices most +closely allied to sex--drink and gambling.</p> + +<p>Now sexual morality is pretty clearly defined +for the Commission. As we have seen, it means +that sex must be confined to procreation by a +healthy, intelligent and strictly monogamous +couple. All other sexual expression would come +under the ban of disapproval. I am sure I do +the Commission no injustice. Now this limited +conception of sex has had a disastrous effect: it +has forced the Commission to ignore the sexual +impulse in discussing a sexual problem. Any +modification of the relationship of men and +women was immediately put out of consideration. +Such suggestions as Forel, Ellen Key, or Havelock +Ellis make could, of course, not even get a +hearing.</p> + +<p>With this moral ideal in mind, not only vice, +but sex itself, becomes an evil thing. Hence the +hysterical and minute application of the taboo +wherever sex shows itself. Barred from any reform +which would reabsorb the impulse into civilized +life, the Commissioners had no other course +but to hunt it, as an outlaw. And in doing this +they were compelled to discard the precious values +of art, religion and social life of which this superfluous +energy is the creator. Driven to think of +it as bad, except for certain particular functions, +they could, of course, not see its possibilities. +Hence the poverty of their suggestions along educational +and artistic lines.</p> + +<p>A valuable contribution, we are told, must be +<i>reasonable</i> and <i>practical</i>. Here is a case where +words cannot be taken literally. "Reasonable" in +America certainly never even pretended to mean +in accordance with a rational ideal, and "practical,"--well +one thinks of "practical politics," +"practical business men," and "unpractical reformers." +Boiled down these words amount to +something like this: the proposals must not be +new or startling; must not involve any radical disturbance +of any respectable person's selfishness; +must not call forth any great opposition; must +look definite and immediate; must be tangible +like a raid, or a jail, or the paper of an ordinance, +or a policeman's club. Above all a "reasonable +and practical" proposal must not require any imaginative +patience. The actual proposals have all +these qualities: if they are "reasonable and practical" +then we know by a good demonstration +what these terms meant to that average body of +citizens.</p> + +<p>To see that is to see exposed an important facet +of the American temperament. Our dislike of +"talk"; the frantic desire to "do something" without +inquiring whether it is worth doing; the dollar +standard; the unwillingness to cast any bread +upon the waters; our preference for a sparrow +in the hand to a forest of song-birds; the naïve +inability to understand the inner satisfactions of +bankrupt poets and the unworldliness of eccentric +thinkers; success-mania; philistinism--they are +pieces of the same cloth. They come from failure +or unwillingness to project the mind beyond the +daily routine of things, to play over the whole +horizon of possibilities, and to recognize that all +is not said when we have spoken. In those +words "reasonable and practical" is the Chinese +Wall of America, that narrow boundary which +contracts our vision to the moment, cuts us off +from the culture of the world, and makes us such +provincial, unimaginative blunderers over our own +problems. Fixation upon the immediate has made +a rich country poor in leisure, has in a land meant +for liberal living incited an insane struggle for existence. +One suspects at times that our national +cult of optimism is no real feeling that the world +is good, but a fear that pessimism will produce +panics.</p> + +<p>How this fascination of the obvious has balked +the work of the Commission I need not elaborate. +That the long process of civilizing sex received +perfunctory attention; that the imaginative +value of sex was lost in a dogma; that the implied +changes in social life were dodged--all that +has been pointed out. It was the inability to rise +above the immediate that makes the report read +as if the policeman were the only agent of civilization.</p> + +<p>For where in the report is any thorough discussion +by sociologists of the relations of business +and marriage to vice? Why is there no testimony +by psychologists to show how sex can be +affected by environment, by educators to show +how it can be trained, by industrial experts to +show how monotony and fatigue affect it? Where +are the detailed proposals by specialists, for decent +housing and working conditions, for educational +reform, for play facilities? The Commission +wasn't afraid of details: didn't it recommend +searchlights in the parks as a weapon against +vice? Why then isn't there a budget, a large, +comprehensive budget, precise and informing, in +which provision is made for beginning to civilize +Chicago? That wouldn't have been "reasonable +and practical," I presume, for it would have cost +millions and millions of dollars. And where +would the money have come from? Were the +single-taxers, the Socialists consulted? But their +proposals would require big changes in property +interests, and would that be "reasonable and practical"? +Evidently not: it is more reasonable and +practical to keep park benches out of the shadows +and to plague unescorted prostitutes.</p> + +<p>And where are the open questions: the issues +that everybody should consider, the problems that +scientists should study? I see almost no trace of +them. Why are the sexual problems not even +stated? Where are the doubts that should have +honored these investigations, the frank statement +of all the gaps in knowledge, and the obscurities +in morals? Knowing perfectly well that vice will +not be repressed within a year or prostitution absolutely +annihilated in ten, it might, I should +think, have seemed more important that the issues +be made clear and the thought of the people fertilized +than that the report should look very definite +and precise. There are all sorts of things +we do not understand about this problem. The +opportunities for study which the Commissioners +had must have made these empty spaces evident. +Why then were we not taken into their confidence? +Along what lines is investigation most +needed? To what problems, what issues, shall +we give our attention? What is the debatable +ground in this territory? The Commission does +not say, and I for one, ascribe the silence to the +American preoccupation with immediate, definite, +tangible interests.</p> + +<p>Wells has written penetratingly about this in +"The New Machiavelli." I have called this fixation +on the nearest object at hand an American +habit. Perhaps as Mr. Wells shows it is an English +one too. But in this country we have a philosophy +to express it--the philosophy of the Reasonable +and the Practical, and so I do not hesitate +to import Mr. Wells's observations: "It has +been the chronic mistake of statecraft and all organizing +spirits to attempt immediately to scheme +and arrange and achieve. Priests, schools of +thought, political schemers, leaders of men, have +always slipped into the error of assuming that +they can think out the whole--or at any rate +completely think out definite parts--of the purpose +and future of man, clearly and finally; they +have set themselves to legislate and construct on +that assumption, and, experiencing the perplexing +obduracy and evasions of reality, they have taken +to dogma, persecution, training, pruning, secretive +education; and all the stupidities of self-sufficient +energy. In the passion of their good intentions +they have not hesitated to conceal facts, +suppress thought, crush disturbing initiatives and +apparently detrimental desires. And so it is +blunderingly and wastefully, destroying with the +making, that any extension of social organization +is at present achieved. Directly, however, this +idea of an emancipation from immediacy is +grasped, directly the dominating importance of +this critical, less personal, mental hinterland in +the individual and of the collective mind in the +race is understood, the whole problem of the +statesman and his attitude toward politics gains a +new significance, and becomes accessible to a new +series of solutions...."</p> + +<p>Let no one suppose that the unwillingness to +cultivate what Mr. Wells calls the "mental hinterland" +is a vice peculiar to the business man. +The colleges submit to it whenever they concentrate +their attention on the details of the student's +vocation before they have built up some cultural +background. The whole drift towards industrial +training in schools has the germs of disaster +within it--a preoccupation with the technique of +a career. I am not a lover of the "cultural" activities +of our schools and colleges, still less am I +a lover of shallow specialists. The unquestioned +need for experts in politics is full of the very real +danger that detailed preparation may give us a +bureaucracy--a government by men divorced +from human tradition. The churches submit to +the demand for immediacy with great alacrity. +Look at the so-called "liberal" churches. Reacting +against an empty formalism they are tumbling +over themselves to prove how directly they touch +daily life. You read glowing articles in magazines +about preachers who devote their time to +housing reforms, milk supplies, the purging of +the civil service. If you lament the ugliness of +their churches, the poverty of the ritual, and the +political absorption of their sermons, you are told +that the church must abandon forms and serve the +common life of men. There are many ways of +serving everyday needs,--turning churches into +social reform organs and political rostra is, it +seems to me, an obvious but shallow way of performing +that service. When churches cease to +paint the background of our lives, to nourish a +Weltanschaung, strengthen men's ultimate purposes +and reaffirm the deepest values of life, then +churches have ceased to meet the needs for which +they exist. That "hinterland" affects daily life, +and the church which cannot get a leverage on it +by any other method than entering into immediate +political controversy is simply a church that is +dead. It may be an admirable agent of reform, +but it has ceased to be a church.</p> + +<p>A large wing of the Socialist Party is the slave +of obvious success. It boasts that it has ceased to +be "visionary" and has become "practical." +Votes, winning campaigns, putting through reform +measures seem a great achievement. It forgets +the difference between voting the Socialist +ticket and understanding Socialism. The vote is +the tangible thing, and for that these Socialist +politicians work. They get the votes, enough to +elect them to office. In the City of Schenectady +that happened as a result of the mayoralty campaign +of 1911. I had an opportunity to observe +the results. A few Socialists were in office set to +govern a city with no Socialist "hinterland." It +was a pathetic situation, for any reform proposal +had to pass the judgment of men and women who +did not see life as the officials did. On no important +measure could the administration expect popular +understanding. What was the result? In +crucial issues, like taxation, the Socialists had to +submit to the ideas,--the general state of mind +of the community. They had to reverse their +own theories and accept those that prevailed in +that unconverted city. I wondered over our +helplessness, for I was during a period one of +those officials. The other members of the administration +used to say at every opportunity that we +were fighting "The Beast" or "Special Privilege." +But to me it always seemed that we were like +Peer Gynt struggling against the formless Boyg--invisible +yet everywhere--we were struggling +with the unwatered hinterland of the citizens of +Schenectady. I understood then, I think, what +Wells meant when he said that he wanted "no +longer to 'fix up,' as people say, human affairs, +but to devote his forces to the development of +that needed intellectual life without which all his +shallow attempts at fixing up are futile." For in +the last analysis the practical and the reasonable +are little idols of clay that thwart our efforts.</p> + +<p>The third requirement of a valuable contribution, +says the Chicago Commission, is the constitutional +sanction. This idol carries its own criticism +with it. The worship of the constitution +amounts, of course, to saying that men exist for +the sake of the constitution. The person who +holds fast to that idea is forever incapable of understanding +either men or constitutions. It is a +prime way of making laws ridiculous; if you want +to cultivate <i>lèse-majesté</i> in Germany get the +Kaiser to proclaim his divine origin; if you want +to promote disrespect of the courts, announce +their infallibility.</p> + +<p>But in this case, the Commission is not representative +of the dominant thought of our times. +The vital part of the population has pretty well +emerged from any dumb acquiescence in constitutions. +Theodore Roosevelt, who reflects so +much of America, has very definitely cast down +this idol. Now since he stands generally some +twenty years behind the pioneer and about six +months ahead of the majority, we may rest assured +that this much-needed iconoclasm is in process +of achievement.</p> + +<p>Closely related to the constitution and just as +decadent to-day are the Sanctity of Private Property, +Vested Rights, Competition the Life of +Trade, Prosperity (at any cost). Each one of +these ideas was born of an original need, served +its historical function and survived beyond its allotted +time. Nowadays you still come across +some of these ancient notions, especially in courts, +where they do no little damage in perverting justice, +but they are ghost-like and disreputable, gibbering +and largely helpless. He who is watching +the ascendant ideas of American life can afford +to feel that the early maxims of capitalism are +doomed.</p> + +<p>But the habit of mind which would turn an instrument +of life into an immutable law of its existence--that +habit is always with us. We may +outgrow our adoration of the Constitution or +Private Property only to establish some new +totem pole. In the arts we call this inveterate +tendency classicalism. It is, of course, a habit by +no means confined to the arts. Politics, religion, +science are subject to it,--in politics we call it conservative, +in religion orthodox, in science we describe +it as academic. Its manifestations are +multiform but they have a common source. An +original creative impulse of the mind expresses +itself in a certain formula; posterity mistakes the +formula for the impulse. A genius will use his +medium in a particular way because it serves his +need; this way becomes a fixed rule which the +classicalist serves. It has been pointed out that +because the first steam trains were run on roads +built for carts and coaches, the railway gauge +almost everywhere in the world became fixed at +four feet eight and one-half inches.</p> + +<p>You might say that genius works inductively +and finds a method; the conservative works deductively +from the method and defeats whatever +genius he may have. A friend of mine had written +a very brilliant article on a play which had +puzzled New York. Some time later I was discussing +the article with another friend of a decidedly +classicalist bent. "What is it?" he protested, +"it isn't criticism for it's half rhapsody; +it isn't rhapsody because it is analytical.... +What is it? That's what I want to know." "But +isn't it fine, and worth having, and aren't you glad +it was written?" I pleaded. "Well, if I knew +what it was...." And so the argument +ran for hours. Until he had subsumed the article +under certain categories he had come to accept, +appreciation was impossible for him. I +have many arguments with my classicalist friend. +This time it was about George Moore's "Ave." +I was trying to express my delight. "It isn't a +novel, or an essay, or a real confession--it's +nothing," said he. His well-ordered mind was +compelled to throw out of doors any work for +which he had no carefully prepared pocket. I +thought of Aristotle, who denied the existence of +a mule because it was neither a horse nor an ass.</p> + +<p>Dramatic critics follow Aristotle in more ways +than one. A play is produced which fascinates +an audience for weeks. It is published and read +all over the world. Then you are treated to +endless discussions by the critics trying to prove +that "it is not a play." So-and-so-and-so constitute +a play, they affirm,--this thing doesn't meet +the requirements, so away with it. They forget +that nobody would have had the slightest idea +what a play was if plays hadn't been written; that +the rules deduced from the plays that have already +been written are no eternal law for the +plays that will be.</p> + +<p>Classicalism and invention are irreconcilable +enemies. Let it be understood that I am not decrying +the great nourishment which a living tradition +offers. The criticism I am making is of +those who try to feed upon the husks alone. +Without the slightest paradox one may say that +the classicalist is most foreign to the classics. He +does not put himself within the creative impulses +of the past: he is blinded by their manifestations. +It is perhaps no accident that two of the greatest +classical scholars in England--Gilbert Murray +and Alfred Zimmern--are political radicals. The +man whom I call here the classicalist cannot possibly +be creative, for the essence of his creed is +that there must be nothing new under the sun.</p> + +<p>The United States, you imagine, would of all +nations be the freest from classicalism. Settled +as a great adventure and dedicated to an experiment +in republicanism, the tradition of the country +is of extending boundaries, obstacles overcome, +and pioneering exploits in which a wilderness was +subdued to human uses. The very air of America +would seem to be a guarantee against formalism. +You would think that self-government finds its +surest footing here--that real autonomy of the +spirit which makes human uses the goal of effort, +denies all inhuman ideals, seeks out what men +want, and proceeds to create it. With such a history +how could a nation fail to see in its constitution +anything but a tool of life, like the axe, the +spade or the plough?</p> + +<p>The West has in a measure carried its freedom +over into politics and social life generally. +Formalism sets in as you move east and south into +the older and more settled communities. There +the pioneering impulse has passed out of life into +stupid history books, and the inevitable classicalism, +the fear of adventure, the superstition before +social invention, have reasserted themselves. +If I may turn for a moment from description to +prophecy, it is to say that this equilibrium will +not hold for very long. There are signs that the +West after achieving the reforms which it needs +to-day--reforms which will free its economic life +from the credit monopolies of the East, and give +it a greater fluidity in the marketing of its products--will +follow the way of all agricultural communities +to a rural and placid conservatism. The +spirit of the pioneer does not survive forever: it +is kept alive to-day, I believe, by certain unnatural +irritants which may be summed up as absentee +ownership. The West is suffering from foreignly +owned railroads, power-resources, and an alien +credit control. But once it recaptures these essentials +of its economic life, once the "progressive" +movement is victorious, I venture to predict +that the agricultural West will become the heart +of American complacency. The East, on the +other hand, with its industrial problem must go +to far more revolutionary measures for a solution. +And the East is fertilized continually by +European traditions: that stream of immigration +brings with it a thousand unforeseeable possibilities. +The great social adventure of America is +no longer the conquest of the wilderness but the +absorption of fifty different peoples. To-day perhaps, +it is still predominantly a question for the +East. But it means that America is turning from +the contrast between her courage and nature's obstacles +to a comparison of her civilization with +Europe's. Immigration more than anything else +is drawing us into world problems. Many people +profess to see horrible dangers in the foreign +invasion. Certainly no man is sure of its conclusion. +It may swamp us, it may, if we seize the +opportunity, mean the impregnation of our national +life with a new brilliancy.</p> + +<p>I have said that the West is still moved by the +tapering impulse of the pioneer, and I have ventured +to predict that this would soon dwindle into +an agricultural toryism. That prediction may +very easily be upset. Far-reaching mechanical inventions +already threaten to transform farming +into an industry. I refer to those applications of +power to agriculture which will inevitably divorce +the farmer from the ownership of his tools. An +industrial revolution analogous to that in manufacture +during the nineteenth century is distinctly +probable, and capitalistic agriculture may soon +cease to be a contradiction in terms. Like all inventions +it will disturb deeply the classicalist tendency, +and this disturbance may generate a new +impulse to replace the decadent one of the +pioneer.</p> + +<p>Without some new dynamic force America, for +all her tradition, is not immune to a hardening formalism. +The psychological descent into classicalism +is always a strong possibility. That is why +we, the children of frontiersmen, city builders and +immigrants, surprise Europe constantly with our +worship of constitutions, our social and political +timidity. In many ways we are more defenceless +against these deadening habits than the people +of Europe. Our geographical isolation preserves +us from any vivid sense of national contrast: +our imaginations are not stirred by different +civilizations. We have almost no spiritual +weapons against classicalism: universities, +churches, newspapers are by-products of a commercial +success; we have no tradition of intellectual +revolt. The American college student has +the gravity and mental habits of a Supreme Court +judge; his "wild oats" are rarely spiritual; the +critical, analytical habit of mind is distrusted. We +say that "knocking" is a sign of the "sorehead" +and we sublimate criticism by saying that "every +knock is a boost." America does not play with +ideas; generous speculation is regarded as insincere, +and shunned as if it might endanger the optimism +which underlies success. All this becomes +such an insulation against new ideas that when +the Yankee goes abroad he takes his environment +with him.</p> + +<p>It seems at times as if our capacity for appreciating +originality were absorbed in the trivial eccentricities +of fads and fashions. The obvious novelties of machinery and locomotion, +phonographs and yellow journalism slake the American +thirst for creation pretty thoroughly. In serious +matters we follow the Vice Commission's fourth +essential of a valuable contribution--<i>that which +will square with the public conscience of the +American people</i>.</p> + +<p>I do not care to dilate upon the exploded +pretensions of Mr. and Mrs. Grundy. They are a +fairly disreputable couple by this time because we +are beginning to know how much morbidity they +represent. The Vice Commission, for example, +bowed to what might be called the "instinctive +conscience" of America when it balked at tracing +vice to its source in the over-respected institutions +of American life and the over-respected natures +of American men and women. It bowed to the +prevailing conscience when it proposed taboos instead +of radical changes. It bowed to a traditional +conscience when it confused the sins of sex +with the possibilities of sex; and it paid tribute to +a verbal conscience, to a lip morality, when, with +extreme irrelevance to its beloved police, it proclaimed +"absolute annihilation" the ultimate ideal. +In brief, the commission failed to see that the +working conscience of America is to-day bound +up with the very evil it is supposed to eradicate by +a relentless warfare.</p> + +<p>It was to be expected. Our conscience is not +the vessel of eternal verities. It grows with our +social life, and a new social condition means a +radical change in conscience. In order to do away +with vice America must live and think and feel +differently. This is an old story. Because of it +all innovators have been at war with the public +conscience of their time. Yet there is nothing +strange or particularly disheartening about this +commonplace observation: to expect anything else +is to hope that a nation will lift itself by its own +bootstraps. Yet there is danger the moment leaders +of the people make a virtue of homage to the +unregenerate, public conscience.</p> + +<p>In La Follette's Magazine (Feb. 17, 1912) +there is a leading article called "The Great Issue." +You can read there that "the composite +judgment is always safer and wiser and stronger +and more unselfish than the judgment of any one +individual mind. The people have been betrayed +by their representatives again and again. The +real danger to democracy lies not in the ignorance +or want of patriotism of the people, but in the +corrupting influence of powerful business organizations +upon the representatives of the people...."</p> + +<p>I have only one quarrel with that philosophy--its +negativity. With the belief that government +is futile and mischievous unless supported by the +mass of the people; with the undeniable fact that +business has corrupted public officials--I have no +complaint. What I object to is the emphasis +which shifts the blame for our troubles from the +shoulders of the people to those of the "corrupting +interests." For this seems to me nothing but +the resuscitation of the devil: when things go +wrong it is somebody else's fault. We are peculiarly +open to this kind of vanity in America. +If some wise law is passed we say it is the will +of the people showing its power of self-government. +But if that will is so weak and timid +that a great evil like child labor persists to our +shame we turn the responsibility over to the +devil personified as a "special interest." It is +an old habit of the race which seems to have +begun with the serpent in the Garden of Eden.</p> + +<p>The word demagogue has been frightfully +maltreated in late years, but surely here is its +real meaning--to flatter the people by telling +them that their failures are somebody else's fault. +For if a nation declares it has reached its majority +by instituting self-government, then it cannot +shirk responsibility.</p> + +<p>These "special interests"--big business, a corrupt +press, crooked politics--grew up within the +country, were promoted by American citizens, admired +by millions of them, and acquiesced in by +almost all of them. Whoever thinks that business +corruption is the work of a few inhumanly +cunning individuals with monstrous morals is +self-righteous without excuse. Capitalists did not +violate the public conscience of America; they +expressed it. That conscience was inadequate +and unintelligent. We are being pinched by the +acts it nourished. A great outcry has arisen and +a number of perfectly conventional men like +Lorimer suffer an undeserved humiliation. We +say it is a "moral awakening." That is another +dodge by which we pretend that we were always +wise and just, though a trifle sleepy. In reality +we are witnessing a change of conscience, initiated +by cranks and fanatics, sustained for a long time +by minorities, which has at last infected the mass +of the people.</p> + +<p>The danger I spoke of arises just here: the +desire to infect at once the whole mass crowds +out the courage of the innovator. No man can +do his best work if he bows at every step to the +public conscience of his age. The real service +to democracy is the fullest, freest expression of +talent. The best servants of the people, like the +best valets, must whisper unpleasant truths in +the master's ear. It is the court fool, not the +foolish courtier, whom the king can least afford +to lose.</p> + +<p>Hostile critics of democracy have long pointed +out that mediocrity becomes the rule. They have +not been without facts for their support. And +I do not see why we who believe in democracy +should not recognize this danger and trace it to +its source. Certainly it is not answered with a +sneer. I have worked in the editorial office of +a popular magazine, a magazine that is known +widely as a champion of popular rights. By +personal experience, by intimate conversations, +and by looking about, I think I am pretty well +aware of what the influence of business upon +journalism amounts to. I have seen the inside +working of business pressure; articles of my own +have been suppressed after they were in type; +friends of mine have told me stories of expurgation, +of the "morganization" of their editorial +policy. And in the face of that I should like +to record it as my sincere conviction that no +financial power is one-tenth so corrupting, so insidious, +so hostile to originality and frank statement +as the fear of the public which reads the +magazine. For one item suppressed out of respect +for a railroad or a bank, nine are rejected +because of the prejudices of the public. This +will anger the farmers, that will arouse the +Catholics, another will shock the summer girl. +Anybody can take a fling at poor old Mr. Rockefeller, +but the great mass of average citizens (to +which none of us belongs) must be left in undisturbed +possession of its prejudices. In that +subservience, and not in the meddling of Mr. +Morgan, is the reason why American journalism +is so flaccid, so repetitious and so dull.</p> + +<p>The people should be supreme, yes, its will +should be the law of the land. But it is a caricature +of democracy to make it also the law of individual +initiative. One thing it is to say that +all proposals must ultimately win the acceptance +of the majority; it is quite another to propose +nothing which is not immediately acceptable. It +is as true of the nation as of the body that one +leg cannot go forward very far unless the whole +body follows. That is a different thing from +trying to move both legs forward at the same +time. The one is democracy; the other is--demolatry.</p> + +<p>It is better to catch the idol-maker than to +smash each idol. It would be an endless task to +hunt down all the masks, the will-o'-the-wisps and +the shadows which divert us from our real purpose. +Each man carries within himself the cause +of his own mirages. Whenever we accept an idea +as authority instead of as instrument, an idol is +set up. We worship the plough, and not the fruit. +And from this habit there is no permanent escape. +Only effort can keep the mind centered truly. +Whenever criticism slackens, whenever we sink +into acquiescence, the mind swerves aside and +clings with the gratitude of the weary to some +fixed idea. It is so much easier to follow a rule +of thumb, and obey the constitution, than to find +out what we really want and to do it.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>A great deal of political theory has been devoted +to asking: what is the aim of government? +Many readers may have wondered why that +question has not figured in these pages. For the +logical method would be to decide upon the ultimate +ideal of statecraft and then elaborate the +technique of its realization. I have not done that +because this rational procedure inverts the natural +order of things and develops all kinds of theoretical +tangles and pseudo-problems. They come +from an effort to state abstractly in intellectual +terms qualities that can be known only by direct +experience. You achieve nothing but confusion if +you begin by announcing that politics must achieve +"justice" or "liberty" or "happiness." Even +though you are perfectly sure that you know exactly +what these words mean translated into concrete +experiences, it is very doubtful whether you +can really convey your meaning to anyone else. +"Plaisante justice qu'une rivière borne. Vérité, +au deçà des Pyrénées, erreur au de là," says +Pascal. If what is good in the world depended +on our ability to define it we should be hopeless +indeed.</p> + +<p>This is an old difficulty in ethics. Many men +have remarked that we quarrel over the "problem +of evil," never over the "problem of good." +That comes from the fact that good is a quality +of experience which does not demand an explanation. +When we are thwarted we begin to ask +why. It was the evil in the world that set +Leibniz the task of justifying the ways of God +to man. Nor is it an accident that in daily life +misfortune turns men to philosophy. One might +generalize and say that as soon as we begin to +explain, it is because we have been made to complain.</p> + +<p>No moral judgment can decide the value of +life. No ethical theory can announce any intrinsic +good. The whole speculation about +morality is an effort to find a way of living which +men who live it will instinctively feel is good. +No formula can express an ultimate experience; +no axiom can ever be a substitute for what really +makes life worth living. Plato may describe the +objects which man rejoices over, he may guide +them to good experiences, but each man in his +inward life is a last judgment on all his values.</p> + +<p>This amounts to saying that the goal of action +is in its final analysis æsthetic and not moral--a +quality of feeling instead of conformity to rule. +Words like justice, harmony, power, democracy +are simply empirical suggestions which may produce +the good life. If the practice of them does +not produce it then we are under no obligation +to follow them, we should be idolatrous fools to +do so. Every abstraction, every rule of conduct, +every constitution, every law and social arrangement, +is an instrument that has no value in itself. +Whatever credit it receives, whatever reverence +we give it, is derived from its utility in ministering +to those concrete experiences which are as +obvious and as undefinable as color or sound. +We can celebrate the positively good things, we +can live them, we can create them, but we cannot +philosophize about them. To the anæsthetic intellect +we could not convey the meaning of joy. +A creature that could reason but not feel would +never know the value of life, for what is ultimate +is in itself inexplicable.</p> + +<p>Politics is not concerned with prescribing the +ultimate qualities of life. When it tries to do so +by sumptuary legislation, nothing but mischief is +invoked. Its business is to provide opportunities, +not to announce ultimate values; to remove oppressive +evil and to invent new resources for +enjoyment. With the enjoyment itself it can +have no concern. That must be lived by each +individual. In a sense the politician can never +know his own success, for it is registered in men's +inner lives, and is largely incommunicable. An +increasing harvest of rich personalities is the social +reward for a fine statesmanship, but such +personalities are free growths in a cordial environment. +They cannot be cast in moulds or +shaped by law. There is no need, therefore, to +generate dialectical disputes about the final goal +of politics. No definition can be just--too precise +a one can only deceive us into thinking that +our definition is true. Call ultimate values by any +convenient name, it is of slight importance which +you choose. If only men can keep their minds +freed from formalism, idol worship, fixed ideas, +and exalted abstractions, politicians need not +worry about the language in which the end of +our striving is expressed. For with the removal +of distracting idols, man's experience becomes the +center of thought. And if we think in terms of +men, find out what really bothers them, seek to +supply what they really want, hold only their +experience sacred, we shall find our sanction obvious +and unchallenged.</p> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch7">CHAPTER VII</a></h2> + +<h3>THE MAKING OF CREEDS</h3> +<br> + +<p>My first course in philosophy was nothing +less than a summary of the important +systems of thought put forward in Western Europe +during the last twenty-six hundred years. +Perhaps that is a slight exaggeration--we did +gloss over a few centuries in the Middle Ages. +For the rest we touched upon all the historic +names from Thales to Nietzsche. After about +nine weeks of this bewildering transit a friend +approached me with a sour look on his face. +"You know," he said, "I can't make head or tail +out of this business. I agree with each philosopher +as we study him. But when we get to the +next one, I agree with him too. Yet he generally +says the other one was wrong. They can't +all be right. Can they now?" I was too much +puzzled with the same difficulty to help him.</p> + +<p>Somewhat later I began to read the history of +political theories. It was a less disinterested +study than those sophomore speculations, for I +had jumped into a profession which carried me +through some of the underground passages of +"practical politics" and reformist groups. The +tangle of motives and facts and ideas was incredible. +I began to feel the force of Mr. John +Hobson's remark that "if practical workers for +social and industrial reforms continue to ignore +principles ... they will have to pay the +price which short-sighted empiricism always pays; +with slow, hesitant, and staggering steps, with innumerable +false starts and backslidings, they will +move in the dark along an unseen track toward +an unseen goal." The political theorists laid +some claim to lighting up both the track and the +goal, and so I turned to them for help.</p> + +<p>Now whoever has followed political theory +will have derived perhaps two convictions as a +reward. Almost all the thinkers seem to regard +their systems as true and binding, and none of +these systems are. No matter which one you +examine, it is inadequate. You cannot be a +Platonist or a Benthamite in politics to-day. You +cannot go to any of the great philosophers even +for the outlines of a statecraft which shall be +fairly complete, and relevant to American life. +I returned to the sophomore mood: "Each of +these thinkers has contributed something, has had +some wisdom about events. Looked at in bulk +the philosophers can't all be right or all wrong."</p> + +<p>But like so many theoretical riddles, this one +rested on a very simple piece of ignorance. The +trouble was that without realizing it I too had +been in search of the philosopher's stone. I too +was looking for something that could not be +found. That happened in this case to be nothing +less than an absolutely true philosophy of politics. +It was the old indolence of hoping that somebody +had done the world's thinking once and for all. +I had conjured up the fantasy of a system which +would contain the whole of life, be as reliable as +a table of logarithms, foresee all possible emergencies +and offer entirely trustworthy rules of +action. When it seemed that no such system had +ever been produced, I was on the point of damning +the entire tribe of theorists from Plato to +Marx.</p> + +<p>This is what one may call the naïveté of the +intellect. Its hope is that some man living at +one place on the globe in a particular epoch will, +through the miracle of genius, be able to generalize +his experience for all time and all space. +It says in effect that there is never anything +essentially new under the sun, that any moment +of experience sufficiently understood would be +seen to contain all history and all destiny--that +the intellect reasoning on one piece of experience +could know what all the rest of experience was +like. Looked at more closely this philosophy +means that novelty is an illusion of ignorance, +that life is an endless repetition, that when you +know one revolution of it, you know all the rest. +In a very real sense the world has no history and +no future, the race has no career. At any moment +everything is given: our reason could know that +moment so thoroughly that all the rest of life +would be like the commuter's who travels back +and forth on the same line every day. There +would be no inventions and no discoveries, for +in the instant that reason had found the key of +experience everything would be unfolded. The +present would not be the womb of the future: +nothing would be embryonic, nothing would <i>grow</i>. +Experience would cease to be an adventure in +order to become the monotonous fulfilment of a +perfect prophecy.</p> + +<p>This omniscience of the human intellect is one +of the commonest assumptions in the world. Although +when you state the belief as I have, it +sounds absurdly pretentious, yet the boastfulness +is closer to the child's who stretches out its hand +for the moon than the romantic egotist's who +thinks he has created the moon and all the stars. +Whole systems of philosophy have claimed such +an eternal and absolute validity; the nineteenth +century produced a bumper crop of so-called +atheists, materialists and determinists who believed +in all sincerity that "Science" was capable +of a complete truth and unfailing prediction. If +you want to see this faith in all its naïveté go +into those quaint rationalist circles where Herbert +Spencer's ghost announces the "laws of life," +with only a few inessential details omitted.</p> + +<p>Now, of course, no philosophy of this sort has +ever realized such hopes. Mankind has certainly +come nearer to justifying Mr. Chesterton's +observation that one of its favorite games is +called "Cheat the Prophet."... "The +players listen very carefully and respectfully to +all that the clever men have to say about what is +to happen in the next generation. The players +then wait until all the clever men are dead, and +bury them nicely. They then go and do something +else." Now this weakness is not, as Mr. +Chesterton would like to believe, confined to the +clever men. But it is a weakness, and many +people have speculated about it. Why in the +face of hundreds of philosophies wrecked on the +rocks of the unexpected do men continue to believe +that the intellect can transcend the vicissitudes +of experience?</p> + +<p>For they certainly do believe it, and generally +the more parochial their outlook, the more cosmic +their pretensions. All of us at times yearn for +the comfort of an absolute philosophy. We try +to believe that, however finite we may be, our intellect +is something apart from the cycle of our +life, capable by an Olympian detachment from +human interests of a divine thoroughness. Even +our evolutionist philosophy, as Bergson shows, +"begins by showing us in the intellect a local +effect of evolution, a flame, perhaps accidental, +which lights up the coming and going of living +things in the narrow passage open to their action; +and lo! forgetting what it has just told us, makes +of this lantern glimmering in a tunnel a Sun +which can illuminate the world."</p> + +<p>This is what most of us do in our search for +a philosophy of politics. We forget that the big +systems of theory are much more like village +lamp-posts than they are like the sun, that they +were made to light up a particular path, obviate +certain dangers, and aid a peculiar mode of life. +The understanding of the place of theory in life +is a comparatively new one. We are just beginning +to see how creeds are made. And the +insight is enormously fertile. Thus Mr. Alfred +Zimmern in his fine study of "The Greek Commonwealth" +says of Plato and Aristotle that no +interpretation can be satisfactory which does not +take into account the impression left upon their +minds by the social development which made +the age of these philosophers a period of Athenian +decline. Mr. Zimmern's approach is common +enough in modern scholarship, but the full significance +of it for the creeds we ourselves are +making is still something of a novelty. When +we are asked to think of the "Republic" as the +reaction of decadent Greece upon the conservative +temperament of Plato, the function of theory +is given a new illumination. Political philosophy +at once appears as a human invention in a particular +crisis--an instrument to fit a need. The +pretension to finality falls away.</p> + +<p>This is a great emancipation. Instead of +clinging to the naïve belief that Plato was legislating +for all mankind, you can discuss his plans +as a temporary superstructure made for an historical +purpose. You are free then to appreciate +the more enduring portions of his work, to understand +Santayana when he says of the Platonists, +"their theories are so extravagant, yet their +wisdom seems so great. Platonism is a very refined +and beautiful expression of our natural instincts, +it embodies conscience and utters our inmost +hopes." This insight into the values of +human life, partial though it be, is what constitutes +the abiding monument of Plato's genius. +His constructions, his formal creeds, his law-making +and social arrangements are local and +temporary--for us they can have only an antiquarian +interest.</p> + +<p>In some such way as this the sophomoric riddle +is answered: no thinker can lay down a course of +action for all mankind--programs if they are useful +at all are useful for some particular historical +period. But if the thinker sees at all deeply into +the life of his own time, his theoretical system will +rest upon observation of human nature. That +remains as a residue of wisdom long after his +reasoning and his concrete program have passed +into limbo. For human nature in all its profounder +aspects changes very little in the few generations +since our Western wisdom has come to +be recorded. These <i>aperçus</i> left over from the +great speculations are the golden threads which +successive thinkers weave into the pattern of their +thought. Wisdom remains; theory passes.</p> + +<p>If that is true of Plato with his ample vision +how much truer is it of the theories of the littler +men--politicians, courtiers and propagandists +who make up the academy of politics. Machiavelli +will, of course, be remembered at once as +a man, whose speculations were fitted to an historical +crisis. His advice to the Prince was real +advice, not a sermon. A boss was telling a +governor how to extend his power. The wealth +of Machiavelli's learning and the splendid penetration +of his mind are used to interpret experience +for a particular purpose. I have always +thought that Machiavelli derives his bad name +from a too transparent honesty. Less direct +minds would have found high-sounding ethical +sanctions in which to conceal the real intent. +That was the nauseating method of nineteenth +century economists when they tried to identify +the brutal practices of capitalism with the beneficence +of nature and the Will of God. Not so +Machiavelli. He could write without a blush +that "a prince, especially a new one, cannot observe +all those things for which men are esteemed, +being often forced, in order to maintain the state, +to act contrary to fidelity, friendship, humanity, +and religion." The apologists of business also +justified a rupture with human decencies. They +too fitted their theory to particular purposes, but +they had not the courage to avow it even to themselves.</p> + +<p>The rare value of Machiavelli is just this lack +of self-deception. You may think his morals +devilish, but you cannot accuse him of quoting +scripture. I certainly do not admire the end he +serves: the extension of an autocrat's power is +a frivolous perversion of government. His ideal +happens, however, to be the aim of most foreign +offices, politicians and "princes of finance." +Machiavelli's morals are not one bit worse than +the practices of the men who rule the world +to-day. An American Senate tore up the Hay-Pauncefote +treaty, and with the approval of the +President acted "contrary to fidelity" and friendship +too; Austria violated the Treaty of Berlin +by annexing Bosnia and Herzegovina. Machiavelli's +ethics are commonplace enough. His head +is clearer than the average. He let the cat out +of the bag and showed in the boldest terms how +theory becomes an instrument of practice. You +may take him as a symbol of the political +theorist. You may say that all the thinkers of +influence have been writing advice to the Prince. +Machiavelli recognized Lorenzo the Magnificent; +Marx, the proletariat of Europe.</p> + +<p>At first this sounds like standing the world on +its head, denying reason and morality, and exalting +practice over righteousness. That is neither +here nor there. I am simply trying to point out +an illuminating fact whose essential truth can +hardly be disputed. The important social philosophies +are consciously or otherwise the servants +of men's purposes. Good or bad, that it +seems to me is the way we work. We find reasons +for what we want to do. The big men from +Machiavelli through Rousseau to Karl Marx +brought history, logic, science and philosophy to +prop up and strengthen their deepest desires. +The followers, the epigones, may accept the reasons +of Rousseau and Marx and deduce rules +of action from them. But the original genius +sees the dynamic purpose first, finds reasons afterward. +This amounts to saying that man when +he is most creative is not a rational, but a wilful +animal.</p> + +<p>The political thinker who to-day exercises the +greatest influence on the Western World is, I +suppose, Karl Marx. The socialist movement +calls him its prophet, and, while many socialists +say he is superseded, no one disputes his historical +importance. Now Marx embalmed his +thinking in the language of the Hegelian school. +He founded it on a general philosophy of society +which is known as the materialistic conception of +history. Moreover, Marx put forth the claim +that he had made socialism "scientific"--had +shown that it was woven into the texture of +natural phenomena. The Marxian paraphernalia +crowds three heavy volumes, so elaborate and +difficult that socialists rarely read them. I have +known one socialist who lived leisurely on his +country estate and claimed to have "looked" at +every page of Marx. Most socialists, including +the leaders, study selected passages and let it go +at that. This is a wise economy based on a good +instinct. For all the parade of learning and +dialectic is an after-thought--an accident from +the fact that the prophetic genius of Marx appeared +in Germany under the incubus of Hegel. +Marx saw what he wanted to do long before he +wrote three volumes to justify it. Did not the +Communist Manifesto appear many years before +"Das Kapital"?</p> + +<p>Nothing is more instructive than a socialist +"experience" meeting at which everyone tries to +tell how he came to be converted. These gatherings +are notoriously untruthful--in fact, there is +a genial pleasure in not telling the truth about +one's salad days in the socialist movement. The +prevalent lie is to explain how the new convert, +standing upon a mountain of facts, began to trace +out the highways that led from hell to heaven. +Everybody knows that no such process was actually +lived through, and almost without exception +the real story can be discerned: a man was +dissatisfied, he wanted a new condition of life, +he embraced a theory that would justify his hopes +and his discontent. For once you touch the +biographies of human beings, the notion that +political beliefs are logically determined collapses +like a pricked balloon. In the language of +philosophers, socialism as a living force is a +product of the will--a will to beauty, order, +neighborliness, not infrequently a will to health. +Men desire first, then they reason; fascinated by +the future, they invent a "scientific socialism" to +get there.</p> + +<p>Many people don't like to admit this. Or if +they admit it, they do so with a sigh. Their +minds construct a utopia--one in which all judgments +are based on logical inference from syllogisms +built on the law of mathematical probabilities. +If you quote David Hume at them, and +say that reason itself is an irrational impulse they +think you are indulging in a silly paradox. I +shall not pursue this point very far, but I believe +it could be shown without too much difficulty that +the rationalists are fascinated by a certain kind +of thinking--logical and orderly thinking--and +that it is their will to impose that method upon +other men.</p> + +<p>For fear that somebody may regard this as +a play on words drawn from some ultra-modern +"anti-intellectualist" source, let me quote Santayana. +This is what the author of that masterly +series "The Life of Reason" wrote in one of his +earlier books: "The ideal of rationality is itself +as arbitrary, as much dependent on the needs of +a finite organization, as any other ideal. Only +as ultimately securing tranquillity of mind, which +the philosopher instinctively pursues, has it for +him any necessity. In spite of the verbal propriety +of saying that reason demands rationality, +what really demands rationality, what makes it +a good and indispensable thing and gives it all +its authority, is not its own nature, but our need +of it both in safe and economical action and in +the pleasures of comprehension." Because +rationality itself is a wilful exercise one hears +Hymns to Reason and sees it personified as an +extremely dignified goddess. For all the light +and shadow of sentiment and passion play even +about the syllogism.</p> + +<p>The attempts of theorists to explain man's successes +as rational acts and his failures as lapses +of reason have always ended in a dismal and +misty unreality. No genuine politician ever treats +his constituents as reasoning animals. This is as +true of the high politics of Isaiah as it is of the +ward boss. Only the pathetic amateur deludes +himself into thinking that, if he presents the major +and minor premise, the voter will automatically +draw the conclusion on election day. The successful +politician--good or bad--deals with the +dynamics--with the will, the hopes, the needs and +the visions of men.</p> + +<p>It isn't sentimentality which says that where +there is no vision the people perisheth. Every +time Tammany Hall sets off fireworks and oratory +on the Fourth of July; every time the picture of +Lincoln is displayed at a political convention; +every red bandanna of the Progressives and red +flag of the socialists; every song from "The +Battle Hymn of the Republic" to the "International"; +every metrical conclusion to a great +speech--whether we stand at Armageddon, refuse +to press upon the brow of labor another +crown of thorns, or call upon the workers of the +world to unite--every one of these slogans is an +incitement of the will--an effort to energize +politics. They are attempts to harness blind impulses +to particular purposes. They are tributes +to the sound practical sense of a vision in politics. +No cause can succeed without them: so long as +you rely on the efficacy of "scientific" demonstration +and logical proof you can hold your conventions +in anybody's back parlor and have room to +spare.</p> + +<p>I remember an observation that Lincoln +Steffens made in a speech about Mayor Tom +Johnson. "Tom failed," said Mr. Steffens, "because +he was too practical." Coming from a +man who had seen as much of actual politics as +Mr. Steffens, it puzzled me a great deal. I taxed +him with it later and he explained somewhat as +follows: "Tom Johnson had a vision of Cleveland +which he called The City on the Hill. He +pictured the town emancipated from its ugliness +and its cruelty--a beautiful city for free men and +women. He used to talk of that vision to the +'cabinet' of political lieutenants which met every +Sunday night at his house. He had all his appointees +working for the City on the Hill. But +when he went out campaigning before the people +he talked only of three-cent fares and the tax +outrages. Tom Johnson didn't show the people +the City on the Hill. He didn't take them into +his confidence. They never really saw what it +was all about. And they went back on Tom +Johnson."</p> + +<p>That is one of Mr. Steffens's most acute observations. +What makes it doubly interesting is +that Tom Johnson confirmed it a few months before +he died. His friends were telling him that +his defeat was temporary, that the work he had +begun was unchecked. It was plain that in the +midst of his suffering, with death close by, he +found great comfort in that assurance. But his +mind was so realistic, his integrity so great that +he could not blink the fact that there had been +a defeat. Steffens was pointing out the explanation: +"you did not show the people what you +saw, you gave them the details, you fought their +battles, you started to build, but you left them +in darkness as to the final goal."</p> + +<p>I wish I could recall the exact words in which +Tom Johnson replied. For in them the greatest +of the piecemeal reformers admitted the practical +weakness of opportunist politics.</p> + +<p>There is a type of radical who has an idea +that he can insinuate advanced ideas into legislation +without being caught. His plan of action +is to keep his real program well concealed and +to dole out sections of it to the public from time +to time. John A. Hobson in "The Crisis of +Liberalism" describes the "practical reformer" +so that anybody can recognize him: "This revolt +against ideas is carried so far that able men +have come seriously to look upon progress as a +matter for the manipulation of wire-pullers, something +to be 'jobbed' in committee by sophistical +notions or other clever trickery." Lincoln Steffens +calls these people "our damned rascals." Mr. +Hobson continues, "The attraction of some obvious +gain, the suppression of some scandalous +abuse of monopolist power by a private company, +some needed enlargement of existing Municipal +or State enterprise by lateral expansion--such +are the sole springs of action." Well may Mr. +Hobson inquire, <i>"Now, what provision is made +for generating the motor power of progress in +Collectivism?"</i></p> + +<p>No amount of architect's plans, bricks and +mortar will build a house. Someone must have +the wish to build it. So with the modern democratic +state. Statesmanship cannot rest upon the +good sense of its program. It must find popular +feeling, organize it, and make that the motive +power of government. If you study the success +of Roosevelt the point is re-enforced. He is a +man of will in whom millions of people have felt +the embodiment of their own will. For a time +Roosevelt was a man of destiny in the truest +sense. He wanted what a nation wanted: his +own power radiated power; he embodied a vision; +Tom, Dick and Harry moved with his movement.</p> + +<p>No use to deplore the fact. You cannot stop +a living body with nothing at all. I think we may +picture society as a compound of forces that are +always changing. Put a vision in front of one +of these currents and you can magnetize it in +that direction. For visions alone organize popular +passions. Try to ignore them or box them +up, and they will burst forth destructively. When +Haywood dramatizes the class struggle he uses +class resentment for a social purpose. You may +not like his purpose, but unless you can gather +proletarian power into some better vision, you +have no grounds for resenting Haywood. I +fancy that the demonstration of King Canute settled +once and for all the stupid attempt to ignore +a moving force.</p> + +<p>A dynamic conception of society always frightens +a great number of people. It gives politics +a restless and intractable quality. Pure reason +is so gentlemanly, but will and the visions of a +people--these are adventurous and incalculable +forces. Most politicians living for the day prefer +to ignore them. If only society will stand fairly +still while their career is in the making they +are content to avoid the actualities. But a politician +with some imaginative interest in genuine +affairs need not be seduced into the learned folly +of pretending that reality is something else than +it is. If he is to influence life he must deal with +it. A deep respect is due the Schopenhauerian +philosopher who looks upon the world, finds that +its essence is evil, and turns towards insensitive +calm. But no respect is due to anyone who sets +out to reform the world by ignoring its quality. +Whoever is bent upon shaping politics to better +human uses must accept freely as his starting point +the impulses that agitate human beings. If observation +shows that reason is an instrument of +will, then only confusion can result from pretending +that it isn't.</p> + +<p>I have called this misplaced "rationality" a +piece of learned folly, because it shows itself most +dangerously among those thinkers about politics +who are divorced from action. In the Universities +political movements are generally regarded +as essentially static, cut and dried solids to be +judged by their logical consistency. It is as if +the stream of life had to be frozen before it +could be studied. The socialist movement was +given a certain amount of attention when I was +an undergraduate. The discussion turned principally +on two points: were rent, interest and +dividends <i>earned</i>? Was collective ownership of +capital a feasible scheme? And when the professor, +who was a good dialectician, had proved +that interest was a payment for service ("saving") +and that public ownership was not practicable, +it was assumed that socialism was disposed of. +The passions, the needs, the hopes that generate +this world-wide phenomenon were, I believe, +pocketed and ignored under the pat saying: "Of +course, socialism is not an economic policy, it's +a religion." That was the end of the matter for +the students of politics. It was then a matter +for the divinity schools. If the same scholastic +method is in force there, all that would be needed +to crush socialism is to show its dogmatic inconsistencies.</p> + +<p>The theorist is incompetent when he deals with +socialism just because he assumes that men are +determined by logic and that a false conclusion +will stop a moving, creative force. Occasionally +he recognizes the wilful character of politics: +then he shakes his head, climbs into an ivory +tower and deplores the moonshine, the religious +manias and the passions of the mob. Real life +is beyond his control and influence because real +life is largely agitated by impulses and habits, unconscious +needs, faith, hope and desire. With all +his learning he is ineffective because, instead of +trying to use the energies of men, he deplores +them.</p> + +<p>Suppose we recognize that creeds are instruments +of the will, how would it alter the character +of our thinking? Take an ancient quarrel +like that over determinism. Whatever your +philosophy, when you come to the test of actual +facts you find, I think, all grades of freedom +and determinism. For certain purposes you believe +in free will, for others you do not. Thus, +as Mr. Chesterton suggests, no determinist is +prevented from saying "if you please" to the +housemaid. In love, in your career, you have no +doubt that "if" is a reality. But when you are +engaged in scientific investigation, you try to reduce +the spontaneous in life to a minimum. Mr. +Arnold Bennett puts forth a rather curious hybrid +when he advises us to treat ourselves as free +agents and everyone else as an automaton. On +the other hand Prof. Münsterberg has always insisted +that in social relations we must always +treat everyone as a purposeful, integrated character.</p> + +<p>Your doctrine, in short, depends on your purpose: +a theory by itself is neither moral nor immoral, +its value is conditioned by the purpose it +serves. In any accurate sense theory is to be +judged only as an effective or ineffective instrument +of a desire: the discussion of doctrines is +technical and not moral. A theory has no intrinsic +value: that is why the devil can talk +theology.</p> + +<p>No creed possesses any final sanction. Human +beings have desires that are far more important +than the tools and toys and churches they make +to satisfy them. It is more penetrating, in my +opinion, to ask of a creed whether it served than +whether it was "true." Try to judge the great +beliefs that have swayed mankind by their inner +logic or their empirical solidity and you stand +forever, a dull pedant, apart from the interests +of men. The Christian tradition did not survive +because of Aquinas or fall before the Higher +Criticism, nor will it be revived because someone +proves the scientific plausibility of its doctrine. +What we need to know about the Christian epic +is the effect it had on men--true or false, they +have believed in it for nineteen centuries. Where +has it helped them, where hindered? What needs +did it answer? What energies did it transmute? +And what part of mankind did it neglect? Where +did it begin to do violence to human nature?</p> + +<p>Political creeds must receive the same treatment. +The doctrine of the "social contract" formulated +by Hobbes and made current by Rousseau +can no longer be accepted as a true account +of the origin of society. Jean-Jacques is in fact +a supreme case--perhaps even a slight caricature--of +the way in which formal creeds bolster up +passionate wants. I quote from Prof. Walter's +introduction in which he says that "The Social +Contract <i>showed to those who were eager to be +convinced</i> that no power was legitimate which +was guilty of abuses. It is no wonder that its +author was buried in the Pantheon with pompous +procession, that the framers of the new Constitution, +Thouret and Lièyes and La Fayette, did +not forget and dared not forget its doctrines, that +it was the text-book and the delight of Camille +Desmoulins and Danton and St. Just, that Robespierre +read it through once every day." In the +perspective of history, no one feels that he has +said the last word about a philosophy like Rousseau's +after demonstrating its "untruth." Good +or bad, it has meant too much for any such easy +disposal. What shall we call an idea, objectively +untrue, but practically of the highest importance?</p> + +<p>The thinker who has faced this difficulty most +radically is Georges Sorel in the "Reflexions sur +la Violence." His doctrine of the "social myth" +has seemed to many commentators one of those +silly paradoxes that only a revolutionary syndicalist +and Frenchman could have put forward. +M. Sorel is engaged in presenting the General +Strike as the decisive battle of the class struggle +and the core of the socialist movement. Now +whatever else he may be, M. Sorel is not naïve: +the sharp criticism of other socialists was something +he could not peacefully ignore. They told +him that the General Strike was an idle dream, +that it could never take place, that, even if it could, +the results would not be very significant. Sidney +Webb, in the customary Fabian fashion, had dismissed +the General Strike as a sign of socialist +immaturity. There is no doubt that M. Sorel +felt the force of these attacks. But he was not +ready to abandon his favorite idea because it had +been shown to be unreasonable and impossible. +Just the opposite effect showed itself and he seized +the opportunity of turning an intellectual defeat +into a spiritual triumph. This performance must +have delighted him to the very bottom of his +soul, for he has boasted that his task in life is +to aid in ruining "le prestige de la culture bourgeoise."</p> + +<p>M. Sorel's defence of the General Strike is +very startling. He admits that it may never take +place, that it is not a true picture of the goal of +the socialist movement. Without a blush he informs +us that this central gospel of the working +class is simply a "myth." The admission frightens +M. Sorel not at all. "It doesn't matter +much," he remarks, "whether myths contain details +actually destined to realization <i>in the scheme</i> +of an historical future; they are not astrological +almanacks; it may even be that nothing of what +they express will actually happen--as in the case +of that catastrophe which the early Christians +expected. Are we not accustomed in daily life +to recognizing that the reality differs very greatly +from the ideas of it that we made before we +acted? Yet that doesn't hinder us from making +resolutions.... Myths must be judged as +instruments for acting upon present conditions; +all discussion about the manner of applying them +concretely to the course of history is senseless. +<i>The entire myth is what counts....</i> There +is no use then in reasoning about details which +might arise in the midst of the class struggle +... even though the revolutionists should be +deceiving themselves through and through in +making a fantastic picture of the general strike, +this picture would still have been a power of the +highest order in preparing for revolution, so +long as it expressed completely all the aspirations +of socialism and bound together revolutionary +ideas with a precision and firmness that no other +methods of thought could have given."</p> + +<p>It may well be imagined that this highly +sophisticated doctrine was regarded as perverse. +All the ordinary prejudices of thought are irritated +by a thinker who frankly advises masses of +his fellow-men to hold fast to a belief which by +all the canons of common sense is nothing but an +illusion. M. Sorel must have felt the need of +closer statement, for in a letter to Daniel Halèvy, +published in the second edition, he makes his position +much clearer. "Revolutionary myths ..." +we read, "enable us to understand the activity, +the feelings, and the ideas of a populace preparing +to enter into a decisive struggle; <i>they are not +descriptions of things, but expressions of will</i>." +The italics are mine: they set in relief the insight +that makes M. Sorel so important to our discussion. +I do not know whether a quotation torn +from its context can possibly do justice to its author. +I do know that for any real grasp of +this point it is necessary to read M. Sorel with +great sympathy.</p> + +<p>One must grant at least that he has made an +accurate observation. The history of the world +is full of great myths which have had the most +concrete results. M. Sorel cites primitive Christianity, +the Reformation, the French Revolution +and the Mazzini campaign. The men who took +part in those great social movements summed up +their aspiration in pictures of decisive battles resulting +in the ultimate triumph of their cause. +We in America might add an example from our +own political life. For it is Theodore Roosevelt +who is actually attempting to make himself and +his admirers the heroes of a new social myth. +Did he not announce from the platform at Chicago--"we +stand at Armageddon and we battle +for the Lord"?</p> + +<p>Let no one dismiss M. Sorel then as an empty +paradoxer. The myth is not one of the outgrown +crudities of our pagan ancestors. We, in the +midst of our science and our rationalism, are +still making myths, and their force is felt in the +actual affairs of life. They convey an impulse, +not a program, nor a plan of reconstruction. +Their practical value cannot be ignored, for they +embody the motor currents in social life.</p> + +<p>Myths are to be judged, as M. Sorel says, by +their ability to express aspiration. They stand +or fall by that. In such a test the Christian +myth, for example, would be valued for its power +of incarnating human desire. That it did not do +so completely is the cause of its decline. From +Aucassin to Nietzsche men have resented it as +a partial and stunting dream. It had too little +room for profane love, and only by turning the +Church of Christ into the Church Militant could +the essential Christian passivity obtain the assent +of aggressive and masculine races. To-day traditional +Christianity has weakened in the face of +man's interest in the conquest of this world. The +liberal and advanced churches recognize this fact +by exhibiting a great preoccupation with everyday +affairs. Now they may be doing important service--I +have no wish to deny that--but when +the Christian Churches turn to civics, to reformism +or socialism, they are in fact announcing that +the Christian dream is dead. They may continue +to practice some of its moral teachings and hold +to some of its creed, but the Christian impulse +is for them no longer active. A new dream, which +they reverently call Christian, has sprung from +their desires.</p> + +<p>During their life these social myths contain +a nation's finest energy. It is just because they +are "not descriptions of things, but expressions +of will" that their influence is so great. Ignore +what a man desires and you ignore the very +source of his power; run against the grain of a +nation's genius and see where you get with your +laws. Robert Burns was right when he preferred +poetry to charters. The recognition of this truth +by Sorel is one of the most impressive events in +the revolutionary movement. Standing as a +spokesman of an actual social revolt, he has not +lost his vision because he understands its function. +If Machiavelli is a symbol of the political +theorist making reason an instrument of purpose, +we may take Sorel as a self-conscious representative +of the impulses which generate purpose.</p> + +<p>It must not be supposed that respect for the +myth is a discovery of Sorel's. He is but one +of a number of contemporary thinkers who have +reacted against a very stupid prejudice of nineteenth +century science to the effect that the mental +habits of human beings were not "facts." Unless +ideas mirrored external nature they were regarded +as beneath the notice of the scientific mind. But +in more recent years we have come to realize that, +in a world so full of ignorance and mistake, error +itself is worthy of study. Our untrue ideas are +significant because they influence our lives enormously. +They are "facts" to be investigated. +One might point to the great illumination that +has resulted from Freud's analysis of the abracadabra +of our dreams. No one can any longer +dismiss the fantasy because it is logically inconsistent, +superficially absurd, or objectively untrue. +William James might also be cited for his defense +of those beliefs that are beyond the realm of +proof. His essay, "The Will to Believe," is a +declaration of independence, which says in effect +that scientific demonstration is not the only test +of ideas. He stated the case for those beliefs +which influence life so deeply, though they fail +to describe it. James himself was very disconcerting +to many scientists because he insisted on +expressing his aspirations about the universe in +what his colleague Santayana calls a "romantic +cosmology": "I am far from wishing to suggest +that such a view seems to me more probable than +conventional idealism or the Christian Orthodoxy. +All three are in the region of dramatic system-making +and myth, to which probabilities are irrelevant."</p> + +<p>It is impossible to leave this point without quoting +Nietzsche, who had this insight and stated it +most provocatively. In "Beyond Good and Evil" +Nietzsche says flatly that "the falseness of an +opinion is not for us any objection to it: it is here, +perhaps, that our new language sounds most +strangely. The question is, how far an opinion +is life-furthering, life-preserving, species-preserving, +perhaps species-rearing...." Then he +comments on the philosophers. "They all pose +as though their real opinions had been discovered +and attained through the self-evolving of a cold, +pure, divinely indifferent dialectic...; whereas, +in fact, a prejudiced proposition, idea, or +'suggestion,' which is generally their heart's desire +abstracted and refined, is defended by them +with arguments sought out after the event. They +are all advocates who do not wish to be regarded +as such, generally astute defenders, also, of their +prejudices, which they dub 'truths'--and <i>very</i> +far from having the conscience which bravely +admits this to itself; very far from having the +good taste or the courage which goes so far +as to let this be understood, perhaps to warn +friend or foe, or in cheerful confidence and self-ridicule.... +It has gradually become clear +to me what every great philosophy up till now has +consisted of--namely, the confession of its originator, +and a species of involuntary and unconscious +autobiography, and, moreover, that the +moral (or immoral) purpose in every philosophy +has constituted the true vital germ out of which +the entire plant has always grown.... Whoever +considers the fundamental impulses of man +with a view to determining how far they may have +acted as <i>inspiring</i> genii (or as demons and cobolds) +will find that they have all practiced +philosophy at one time or another, and that each +one of them would have been only too glad to +look upon itself as the ultimate end of existence +and the legitimate <i>lord</i> over all the other impulses. +For every impulse is imperious, and, as +<i>such</i>, attempts to philosophize."</p> + +<p>What Nietzsche has done here is, in his swashbuckling +fashion, to cut under the abstract and +final pretensions of creeds. Difficulties arise when +we try to apply this wisdom in the present. That +dogmas <i>were</i> instruments of human purposes is +not so incredible; that they still <i>are</i> instruments is +not so clear to everyone; and that they will be, +that they should be--this seems a monstrous attack +on the citadel of truth. It is possible to +believe that other men's theories were temporary +and merely useful; we like to believe that ours +will have a greater authority.</p> + +<p>It seems like topsy-turvyland to make reason +serve the irrational. Yet that is just what it has +always done, and ought always to do. Many of +us are ready to grant that in the past men's +motives were deeper than their intellects: we forgive +them with a kind of self-righteousness which +says that they knew not what they did. But to +follow the great tradition of human wisdom deliberately, +with our eyes open in the manner of +Sorel, that seems a crazy procedure. A notion +of intellectual honor fights against it: we think +we must aim at final truth, and not allow autobiography +to creep into speculation.</p> + +<p>Now the trouble with such an idol is that autobiography +creeps in anyway. The more we censor +it, the more likely it is to appear disguised, to +fool us subtly and perhaps dangerously. The +men like Nietzsche and James who show the wilful +origin of creeds are in reality the best watchers +of the citadel of truth. For there is nothing +disastrous in the temporary nature of our ideas. +They are always that. But there may very easily +be a train of evil in the self-deception which regards +them as final. I think God will forgive us +our skepticism sooner than our Inquisitions.</p> + +<p>From the political point of view, another observation +is necessary. The creed of a Rousseau, +for example, is active in politics, not for what it +says, but for what people think it says. I have +urged that Marx found scientific reasons for what +he wanted to do. It is important to add that +the people who adopted his reasons for what they +wanted to do were not any too respectful of +Marx's reasons. Thus the so-called materialistic +philosophy of Karl Marx is not by any means +identical with the theories one hears among +Marxian socialists. There is a big distortion in +the transmitting of ideas. A common purpose, +far more than common ideas, binds Marx to his +followers. And when a man comes to write about +his philosophy he is confronted with a choice: +shall the creed described be that of Marx or of +the Marxians?</p> + +<p>For the study of politics I should say unhesitatingly +that it is more important to know what +socialist leaders, stump speakers, pamphleteers, +think Marx meant, than to know what he said. +For then you are dealing with living ideas: to +search his text has its uses, but compared with +the actual tradition of Marx it is the work of +pedantry. I say this here for two reasons--because +I hope to avoid the critical attack of +the genuine Marxian specialist, and because the +observation is, I believe, relevant to our subject.</p> + +<p>Relevant it is in that it suggests the importance +of style, of propaganda, the popularization of +ideas. The host of men who stand between a +great thinker and the average man are not automatic +transmitters. They work on the ideas; +perhaps that is why a genius usually hates his +disciples. It is interesting to notice the explanation +given by Frau Förster-Nietzsche for her +brother's quarrel with Wagner. She dates it +from the time when Nietzsche, under the guise +of Wagnerian propaganda, began to expound +himself. The critics and interpreters are themselves +creative. It is really unfair to speak of +the Marxian philosophy as a political force. It +is juster to speak of the Marxian tradition.</p> + +<p>So when I write of Marx's influence I have +in mind what men and women in socialist meetings, +in daily life here in America, hold as a +faith and attribute to Marx. There is no pretension +whatever to any critical study of "Das +Kapital" itself. I am thinking rather of stuffy +halls in which an earnest voice is expounding "the +evolution of capitalism," of little groups, curious +and bewildered, listening in the streets of New +York to the story of the battle between the +"master class" and the "working class," of little +red pamphlets, of newspapers, and cartoons--awkward, +badly printed and not very genial, a +great stream of spellbinding and controversy +through which the aspirations of millions are becoming +articulate:</p> + +<p>The tradition is saying that "the system" and +not the individual is at fault. It describes that +system as one in which a small class owns the +means of production and holds the rest of mankind +in bondage. Arts, religions, laws, as well +as vice and crime and degradation, have their +source in this central economic condition. If you +want to understand our life you must see that +it is determined by the massing of capital in the +hands of a few. All epochs are determined by +economic arrangements. But a system of property +always contains within itself "the seeds of +its own destruction." Mechanical inventions suggest +a change: a dispossessed class compels it. +So mankind has progressed through savagery, +chattel slavery, serfdom, to "wage slavery" or +the capitalism of to-day. This age is pregnant +with the socialism of to-morrow.</p> + +<p>So roughly the tradition is handed on. Two +sets of idea seem to dominate it: we are creatures +of economic conditions; a war of classes +is being fought everywhere in which the proletariat +will ultimately capture the industrial machinery +and produce a sound economic life as the basis +of peace and happiness for all. The emphasis +on environment is insistent. Facts are marshaled, +the news of the day is interpreted to show that +men are determined by economic conditions. This +fixation has brought down upon the socialists a +torrent of abuse in which "atheism" and "materialism" +are prevailing epithets. But the propaganda +continues and the philosophy spreads, penetrating +reform groups, social workers, historians, +and sociologists.</p> + +<p>It has served the socialist purpose well. To +the workingmen it has brought home the importance +of capturing the control of industry. +Economic determinism has been an antidote to +mere preaching of goodness, to hero-worship and +political quackery. Socialism to succeed had to +concentrate attention on the ownership of capital: +whenever any other interest like religion or +patriotism threatened to diffuse that attention, +socialist leaders have always been ready to show +that the economic fact is more central. Dignity +and prestige were supplied by making economics +the key of history; passion was chained by building +paradise upon it.</p> + +<p>In all the political philosophies there is none +so adapted to its end. Every sanction that mankind +respects has been grouped about this one +purpose--the control of capital. It is as if all +history converged upon the issue, and the workers +in the cause feel that they carry within them the +destiny of the race. Start anywhere, with an +orthodox socialist and he will lead you to this +supreme economic situation. Tyrannies and race +hatred, national rivalries, sex problems, the difficulties +of artistic endeavor, all failures, crimes, +vices--there is not one which he will not relate +to private capitalism. Nor is there anything disingenuous +about this focusing of the attention: +a real belief is there. Of course you will find +plenty of socialists who see other issues and who +smile a bit at the rigors of economic determinism. +In these later days there is in fact, a decided +loosening in the creed. But it is fair to say that +the mass of socialists hold this philosophy with +as much solemnity as a reformer held his when +he wrote to me that the cure for obscenity was +the taxation of land values and absolute free +trade.</p> + +<p>Singlemindedness has done good service. It +has bound the world together and has helped +men to think socially. Turning their attention +away from the romanticism of history, the materialistic +philosophy has helped them to look +at realities. It has engendered a fine concern +about average people, about the voiceless multitudes +who have been left to pass unnoticed. Not +least among the blessings is a shattering of the +good-and-bad-man theory: the assassination of +tyrants or the adoration of saviors. A shallow +and specious other-worldliness has been driven +out: an other-worldliness which is really nothing +but laziness about this one. And if from a speculative +angle the Marxian tradition has shaded too +heavily the economic facts, it was at least a plausible +and practical exaggeration.</p> + +<p>But the drawbacks are becoming more and +more evident as socialism approaches nearer to +power and responsibility. The feeling that man +is a creature and not a creator is disastrous as +a personal creed when you come to act. If you +insist upon being "determined by conditions" you +do hesitate about saying "I shall." You are likely +to wait for something to determine you. Personal +initiative and individual genius are poorly +regarded: many socialists are suspicious of originality. +This philosophy, so useful in propaganda, +is becoming a burden in action. That is another +way of saying that the instrument has turned into +an idol.</p> + +<p>For while it is illuminating to see how environment +moulds men, it is absolutely essential that +men regard themselves as moulders of their environment. +A new philosophical basis is becoming +increasingly necessary to socialism--one that +may not be "truer" than the old materialism but +that shall simply be more useful. Having learned +for a long time what is done to us, we are now +faced with the task of doing. With this changed +purpose goes a change of instruments. All over +the world socialists are breaking away from the +stultifying influence of the outworn determinism. +For the time is at hand when they must cease to +look upon socialism as inevitable in order to make +it so.</p> + +<p>Nor will the philosophy of class warfare serve +this new need. That can be effective only so long +as the working-class is without sovereignty. But +no sooner has it achieved power than a new outlook +is needed in order to know what to do with +it. The tactics of the battlefield are of no use +when the battle is won.</p> + +<p>I picture this philosophy as one of deliberate +choices. The underlying tone of it is that society +is made by man for man's uses, that reforms are +inventions to be applied when by experiment they +show their civilizing value. Emphasis is placed +upon the devising, adapting, constructing faculties. +There is no reason to believe that this view is +any colder than that of the war of class against +class. It will generate no less energy. Men +to-day can feel almost as much zest in the building +of the Panama Canal as they did in a military +victory. Their domineering impulses find satisfaction +in conquering things, in subjecting brute +forces to human purposes. This sense of mastery +in a winning battle against the conditions of our +life is, I believe, the social myth that will inspire +our reconstructions. We shall feel free to choose +among alternatives--to take this much of socialism, +insert so much syndicalism, leave standing +what of capitalism seems worth conserving. We +shall be making our own house for our own needs, +cities to suit ourselves, and we shall believe ourselves +capable of moving mountains, as engineers +do, when mountains stand in their way.</p> + +<p>And history, science, philosophy will support +our hopes. What will fascinate us in the past +will be the records of inventions, of great choices, +of those alternatives on which destiny seems to +hang. The splendid epochs will be interpreted +as monuments of man's creation, not of his propulsion. +We shall be interested primarily in the +way nations established their civilization in spite +of hostile conditions. Admiration will go out +to the men who did not submit, who bent things +to human use. We may see the entire tragedy of +life in being driven.</p> + +<p>Half-truths and illusions, if you like, but tonic. +This view will suit our mood. For we shall be +making and the makers of history will become +more real to us. Instead of urging that issues +are inevitable, instead of being swamped by +problems that are unavoidable, we may stand up +and affirm the issues we propose to handle. Perhaps +we shall say with Nietzsche:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"Let the value of everything be determined +afresh by you."</p></div> + +<br><br><br> + +<h2><a name="ch8">CHAPTER VIII</a></h2> + +<h3>THE RED HERRING</h3> +<br> + +<p>At the beginning of every campaign the newspapers +tell about secret conferences in +which the candidate and his managers decide +upon "the line of attack." The approach to issues, +the way in which they shall be stressed, what +shall be put forward in one part of the country +and what in another, are discussed at these meetings. +Here is where the real program of a party +is worked out. The document produced at the +convention is at its best nothing but a suggestive +formality. It is not until the speakers and the +publicity agents have actually begun to animate +it that the country sees what the party is about. +It is as if the convention adopted the Decalogue, +while these secret conferences decided which of +the Commandments was to be made the issue. +Almost always, of course, the decision is entirely +a "practical" one, which means that each +section of people is exhorted to practice the commandment +it likes the most. Thus for the burglars +is selected, not the eighth tablet, but the one +on which is recommended a day of rest from +labor; to the happily married is preached the +seventh commandment.</p> + +<p>These conferences are decisive. On them depends +the educational value of a campaign, and +the men who participate in them, being in a position +to state the issues and point them, determine +the political interests of the people for a considerable +period of time. To-day in America, +for example, no candidate can escape entirely that +underlying irritation which socialists call poverty +and some call the high cost of living. But the +conspicuous candidates do decide what direction +thought shall take about this condition. They +can center it upon the tariff or the trusts or even +the currency.</p> + +<p>Thus Mr. Roosevelt has always had a remarkable +power of diverting the country from the tariff +to the control of the trusts. His Democratic opponents, +especially Woodrow Wilson, are, as I +write, in the midst of the Presidential campaign +of 1912, trying to focus attention on the tariff. +In a way the battle resembles a tug-of-war in +which each of the two leading candidates is trying +to pull the nation over to his favorite issue. +On the side you can see the Prohibitionists endeavoring +to make the country see drink as a +central problem; the emerging socialists insisting +that not the tariff, or liquor, or the control of +trusts, but the ownership of capital should be the +heart of the discussion. Electoral campaigns do +not resemble debates so much as they do competing +amusement shows where, with bright lights, +gaudy posters and persuasive, insistent voices, each +booth is trying to collect a crowd; The victory in +a campaign is far more likely to go to the most +plausible diagnosis than to the most convincing +method of cure. Once a party can induce the +country to see its issue as supreme the greater +part of its task is done.</p> + +<p>The clever choice of issues influences all politics +from the petty manœuvers of a ward leader to +the most brilliant creative statesmanship. I remember +an instance that happened at the beginning +of the first socialist administration in Schenectady: +The officials had out of the goodness +of their hearts suspended a city ordinance which +forbade coasting with bob-sleds on the hills of +the city. A few days later one of the sleds ran +into a wagon and a little girl was killed. The +opposition papers put the accident into scareheads +with the result that public opinion became very +bitter. It looked like a bad crisis at the very +beginning and the old ring politicians made the +most of it. But they had reckoned without the +political shrewdness of the socialists. For in +the second day of excitement, the mayor made +public a plan by which the main business street +of the town was to be lighted with high-power +lamps and turned into a "brilliant white way of +Schenectady." The swiftness with which the +papers displaced the gruesome details of the little +girl's death by exultation over the business future +of the city was a caution. Public attention was +shifted and a political crisis avoided. I tell this +story simply as a suggestive fact. The ethical +considerations do not concern us here.</p> + +<p>There is nothing exceptional about the case. +Whenever governments enter upon foreign invasions +in order to avoid civil wars, the same +trick is practiced. In the Southern States the race +issue has been thrust forward persistently to prevent +an economic alignment. Thus you hear from +Southerners that unless socialism gives up its demand +for racial equality, the propaganda cannot +go forward. How often in great strikes have +riots been started in order to prevent the public +from listening to the workers' demands! It is +an old story--the red herring dragged across the +path in order to destroy the scent.</p> + +<p>Having seen the evil results we have come to +detest a conscious choice of issues, to feel that +it smacks of sinister plotting. The vile practice +of yellow newspapers and chauvinistic politicians +is almost the only experience of it we have. Religion, +patriotism, race, and sex are the favorite +red herrings of foul political method--they are +the most successful because they explode so easily +and flood the mind with those unconscious prejudices +which make critical thinking difficult. Yet +for all its abuse the deliberate choice of issues is +one of the high selective arts of the statesman. +In the debased form we know it there is little +encouragement. But the devil is merely a fallen +angel, and when God lost Satan he lost one of his +best lieutenants. It is always a pretty good working +rule that whatever is a great power of evil +may become a great power for good. Certainly +nothing so effective in the art of politics can be +left out of the equipment of the statesman.</p> + +<p>Looked at closely, the deliberate making of +issues is very nearly the core of the statesman's +task. His greatest wisdom is required to select +a policy that will fertilize the public mind. He +fails when the issue he sets is sterile; he is incompetent +if the issue does not lead to the human +center of a problem; whenever the statesman +allows the voters to trifle with taboos and by-products, +to wander into blind alleys like "16 to 1," +his leadership is a public calamity. The newspaper +or politician which tries to make an issue +out of a supposed "prosperity" or out of admiration +for the mere successes of our ancestors is +doing its best to choke off the creative energies in +politics. All the stultification of the stand-pat +mind may be described as inability, and perhaps +unwillingness, to nourish a fruitful choice of +issues.</p> + +<p>That choice is altogether too limited in America, +anyway. Political discussion, whether reactionary +or radical, is monotonously confined to very few +issues. It is as if social life were prevented from +irrigating political thought. A subject like the +tariff, for example, has absorbed an amount of +attention which would justify an historian in calling +it the incubus of American politics. Now the +exaltation of one issue like that is obviously out +of all proportion to its significance. A contributory +factor it certainly is, but the country's destiny +is not bound up finally with its solution. The +everlasting reiterations about the tariff take up +altogether too much time. To any government +that was clear about values, that saw all problems +in their relation to human life, the tariff would +be an incident, a mechanical device and little else. +High protectionist and free trader alike fall under +the indictment--for a tariff wall is neither so high +as heaven nor so broad as the earth. It may be +necessary to have dykes on portions of the seashore; +they may be superfluous elsewhere. But +to concentrate nine-tenths of your attention on +the subject of dykes is to forget the civilization +they are supposed to protect. A wall is a wall: +the presence of it will not do the work of civilization--the +absence of it does not absolve anyone +from the tasks of social life. That a statecraft +might deal with the tariff as an aid to its purposes +is evident. But anyone who makes the tariff the +principal concern of statecraft is, I believe, mistaking +the hedge for the house.</p> + +<p>The tariff controversy is almost as old as the +nation. A more recent one is what Senator La +Follette calls "The great issue before the American +people to-day, ... the control of their +own government." It has taken the form of an +attack on corruption, on what is vaguely called +"special privilege" and of a demand for a certain +amount of political machinery such as direct +primaries, the initiative, referendum, and recall. +The agitation has a curious sterility: the people +are exhorted to control their own government, +but they are given very little advice as to what +they are to do with it when they control it. Of +course, the leaders who spend so much time demanding +these mechanical changes undoubtedly +see them as a safeguard against corrupt politicians +and what Roosevelt calls "their respectable +allies and figureheads, who have ruled and legislated +and decided as if in some way the vested +rights of privilege had a first mortgage on the +whole United States." But look at the <i>way</i> these +innovations are presented and I think the feeling +is unavoidable that the control of government is +emphasized as an end in itself. Now an observation +of this kind is immediately open to dispute: +it is not a clear-cut distinction but a rather subtle +matter of stress--an impression rather than a +definite conviction.</p> + +<p>Yet when you look at the career of Judge +Lindsey in Denver the impression is sharpened +by contrast. What gave his exposure of corruption +a peculiar vitality was that it rested on a +very positive human ideal: the happiness of +children in a big city. Lindsey's attack on vice +and financial jobbery was perhaps the most convincing +piece of muckraking ever done in this +country for the very reason that it sprang from +a concern about real human beings instead of abstractions +about democracy or righteousness. +From the point of view of the political hack, +Judge Lindsey made a most distressing use of +the red herring. He brought the happiness of +childhood into political discussion, and this opened +up a new source of political power. By touching +something deeply instinctive in millions of people, +Judge Lindsey animated dull proposals with human +interest. The pettifogging objections to +some social plan had very little chance of survival +owing to the dynamic power of the reformers. +It was an excellent example of the creative results +that come from centering a political problem +on human nature.</p> + +<p>If you move only from legality to legality, you +halt and hesitate, each step is a monstrous task. +If the reformer is a pure opportunist, and lays +out only "the next step," that step will be very +difficult. But if he aims at some real human end, +at the genuine concerns of men, women, and +children, if he can make the democracy see and +feel that end, the little mechanical devices of +suffrage and primaries and tariffs will be dealt +with as a craftsman deals with his tools. But to +say that we must make tools first, and then begin, +is to invert the process of life. Men did not +agree to refrain from travel until a railroad was +built. To make the manufacture of instruments +an ideal is to lose much of their ideal value. A +nation bent upon a policy of social invention +would make its tools an incident. But just this +perception is lacking in many propagandists. That +is why their issues are so sterile; that is why the +absorption in "next steps" is a diversion from +statesmanship.</p> + +<p>The narrowness of American political issues is +a fixation upon instruments. Tradition has centered +upon the tariff, the trusts, the currency, and +electoral machinery as the items of consideration. +It is the failure to go behind them--to see them +as the pale servants of a vivid social life--that +keeps our politics in bondage to a few problems. +It is a common experience repeated in you and +me. Once our profession becomes all absorbing +it hardens into pedantry. "A human being," says +Wells, "who is a philosopher in the first place, +a teacher in the first place, or a statesman in the +first place is thereby and inevitably, though he +bring God-like gifts to the pretense--a quack."</p> + +<p>Reformers particularly resent the enlargement +of political issues. I have heard socialists denounce +other socialists for occupying themselves +with the problems of sex. The claim was that +these questions should be put aside so as not to +disturb the immediate program. The socialists +knew from experience that sex views cut across +economic ones--that a new interest breaks up the +alignment. Woodrow Wilson expressed this same +fear in his views on the liquor question: after +declaring for local option he went on to say that +"the questions involved are social and moral and +are not susceptible of being made part of a party +program. Whenever they have been made the +subject matter of party contests they have cut the +lines of party organization and party action +athwart, to the utter confusion of political action +in every other field.... I do not believe +party programs of the highest consequence to +the political life of the State and of the nation +ought to be thrust on one side and hopelessly +embarrassed for long periods together by making +a political issue of a great question which is essentially +non-political, non-partisan, moral and +social in its nature."</p> + +<p>That statement was issued at the beginning +of a campaign in which Woodrow Wilson was +the nominee of a party that has always been +closely associated with the liquor interests. The +bogey of the saloon had presented itself early: +it was very clear that an affirmative position by +the candidate was sure to alienate either the temperance +or the "liquor vote." No doubt a sense +of this dilemma is partly responsible for Wilson's +earnest plea that the question of liquor be left +out of the campaign. He saw the confusion and +embarrassment he speaks of as an immediate +danger. Like his views on immigration and +Chinese labor it was a red herring across his +path. It would, if brought into prominence, cut +the lines of party action athwart.</p> + +<p>His theoretical grounds for ignoring the question +in politics are very interesting just because +they are vitalized by this practical difficulty which +he faced. Like all party men Woodrow Wilson +had thrust upon him here a danger that haunts +every political program. The more issues a party +meets the less votes it is likely to poll. And +for a very simple reason: you cannot keep the +citizenship of a nation like this bound in its +allegiance to two large parties unless you make +the grounds of allegiance very simple and very +obvious. If you are to hold five or six million +voters enlisted under one emblem the less specific +you are and the fewer issues you raise the more +probable it is that you can stop this host from +quarreling within the ranks.</p> + +<p>No doubt this is a partial explanation of the +bareness of American politics. The two big +parties have had to preserve a superficial homogeneity; +and a platitude is more potent than an +issue. The minor parties--Populist, Prohibition, +Independence League and Socialist--have shown +a much greater willingness to face new problems. +Their view of national policy has always been +more inclusive, perhaps for the very reason that +their membership is so much more exclusive. But +if anyone wishes a smashing illustration of this +paradox let him consider the rapid progress of +Roosevelt's philosophy in the very short time +between the Republican Convention in June to +the Progressive Convention in August, 1912. As +soon as Roosevelt had thrown off the burden +of preserving a false harmony among irreconcilable +Republicans, he issued a platform full of +definiteness and square dealing with many issues. +He was talking to a minority party. But Roosevelt's +genius is not that of group leadership. He +longs for majorities. He set out to make the +campaign a battle between the Progressives and +the Democrats--the old discredited Republicans +fell back into a rather dead conservative minority. +No sooner did Roosevelt take the stump than +the paradox loomed up before him. His speeches +began to turn on platitudes--on the vague idealism +and indisputable moralities of the Decalogue +and the Sermon on the Mount. The fearlessness +of the Chicago confession was melted down into +a featureless alloy.</p> + +<p>The embarrassment from the liquor question +which Woodrow Wilson feared does not arise +because teetotaler and drunkard both become intoxicated +when they discuss the saloon. It would +come just as much from a radical program of land +taxation, factory reform, or trust control. Let +anyone of these issues be injected into his campaign +and the lines of party action would be cut +"athwart." For Woodrow Wilson was dealing +with the inevitable embarrassment of a party +system dependent on an inexpressive homogeneity. +The grouping of the voters into two large herds +costs a large price: it means that issues must be +so simplified and selected that the real demands +of the nation rise only now and then to the level +of political discussion. The more people a party +contains the less it expresses their needs.</p> + +<p>Woodrow Wilson's diagnosis of the red herring +in politics is obviously correct. A new issue does +embarrass a wholesale organization of the voters. +His desire to avoid it in the midst of a campaign +is understandable. His urgent plea that the +liquor question be kept a local issue may be wise. +But the general philosophy which says that the +party system should not be cut athwart is at least +open to serious dispute. Instead of an evil, it +looks to me like progress towards greater responsiveness +of parties to popular need. It is +good to disturb alignments: to break up a superficial +unanimity. The masses of people held together +under the name Democratic are bound in +an enervating communion. The real groups dare +not speak their convictions for fear the crust will +break. It is as if you had thrown a large sheet +over a mass of men and made them anonymous.</p> + +<p>The man who raises new issues has always been +distasteful to politicians. He musses up what +had been so tidily arranged. I remember once +speaking to a local boss about woman suffrage. +His objections were very simple: "We've got +the organization in fine shape now--we know +where every voter in the district stands. But you +let all the women vote and we'll be confused as +the devil. It'll be an awful job keeping track +of them." He felt what many a manufacturer +feels when somebody has the impertinence to +invent a process which disturbs the routine of +business.</p> + +<p>Hard as it is upon the immediate plans of the +politician, it is a national blessing when the lines +of party action are cut athwart by new issues. +I recognize that the red herring is more often +frivolous and personal--a matter of misrepresentation +and spite--than an honest attempt to enlarge +the scope of politics. However, a fine thing +must not be deplored because it is open to vicious +caricature. To the party worker the petty and +the honest issue are equally disturbing. The +break-up of the parties into expressive groups +would be a ventilation of our national life. No +use to cry peace when there is no peace. The +false bonds are best broken: with their collapse +would come a release of social energy into political +discussion. For every country is a mass of +minorities which should find a voice in public +affairs. Any device like proportional representation +and preferential voting which facilitates the +political expression of group interests is worth +having. The objection that popular government +cannot be conducted without the two party system +is, I believe, refuted by the experience of Europe. +If I had to choose between a Congressional caucus +and a coalition ministry, I should not have to +hesitate very long. But no one need go abroad +for actual experience: in the United States Senate +during the Taft administration there were really +three parties--Republicans, Insurgents and Democrats. +Public business went ahead with at least +as much effectiveness as under the old Aldrich +ring.</p> + +<p>There are deeper reasons for urging a break-up +of herd-politics. It is not only desirable that +groups should be able to contribute to public +discussion: it is absolutely essential if the parliamentary +method is not to be superseded by +direct and violent action. The two party system +chokes off the cry of a minority--perhaps the +best way there is of precipitating an explosion. +An Englishman once told me that the utter freedom +of speech in Hyde Park was the best safeguard +England had against the doctrines that +were propounded there. An anarchist who was +invited to address Congress would be a mild person +compared to the man forbidden to speak in +the streets of San Diego. For many a bomb has +exploded into rhetoric.</p> + +<p>The rigidity of the two-party system is, I believe, +disastrous: it ignores issues without settling +them, dulls and wastes the energies of active +groups, and chokes off the protests which should +find a civilized expression in public life. A recognition +of what an incubus it is should make us +hospitable to all those devices which aim at making +politics responsive by disturbing the alignments +of habit. The initiative and referendum +will help: they are a method of voting on definite +issues instead of electing an administration in +bulk. If cleverly handled these electoral devices +should act as a check on a wholesale attitude +toward politics. Men could agree on a candidate +and disagree on a measure. Another device is +the separation of municipal, state and national +elections: to hold them all at the same time is +an inducement to prevent the voter from splitting +his allegiance. Proportional representation and +preferential voting I have mentioned. The short +ballot is a psychological principle which must be +taken into account wherever there is voting: it +will help the differentiation of political groups +by concentrating the attention on essential choices. +The recall of public officials is in part a policeman's +club, in part a clumsy way of getting around +the American prejudice for a fixed term of office. +That rigidity which by the mere movement of the +calendar throws an official out of office in the +midst of his work or compels him to go campaigning +is merely the crude method of a +democracy without confidence in itself. The recall +is a half-hearted and negative way of dealing +with this difficulty. It does enable us to rid ourselves +of an officer we don't like instead of having +to wait until the earth has revolved to a +certain place about the sun. But we still have +to vote on a fixed date whether we have anything +to vote upon or not. If a recall election is held +when the people petition for it, why not all elections?</p> + +<p>In ways like these we shall go on inventing +methods by which the fictitious party alignments +can be dissolved. There is one device suggested +now and then, tried, I believe, in a few places, +and vaguely championed by some socialists. It +is called in German an "Interessenvertrag"--a +political representation by trade interests as well +as by geographical districts. Perhaps this is the +direction towards which the bi-cameral legislature +will develop. One chamber would then represent +a man's sectional interests as a consumer: the +other his professional interests as a producer. +The railway workers, the miners, the doctors, the +teachers, the retail merchants would have direct +representation in the "Interessenvertrag." You +might call it a Chamber of Special Interests. I +know how that phrase "Special Interests" hurts. +In popular usage we apply it only to corrupting +businesses. But our feeling against them should +not blind us to the fact that every group in the +community has its special interests. They will +always exist until mankind becomes a homogeneous +jelly. The problem is to find some social adjustment +for all the special interests of a nation. +That is best achieved by open recognition and +clear representation. Let no one then confuse +the "Interessenvertrag" with those existing legislatures +which are secret Chambers of Special +Privilege.</p> + +<p>The scheme is worth looking at for it does do +away with the present dilemma of the citizen in +which he wonders helplessly whether he ought to +vote as a consumer or as a producer. I believe he +should have both votes, and the "Interessenvertrag" +is a way.</p> + +<p>These devices are mentioned here as illustrations +and not as conclusions. You can think of +them as arrangements by which the red herring +is turned from a pest into a benefit. I grant that +in the rigid political conditions prevailing to-day +a new issue is an embarrassment, perhaps a +hindrance to the procedure of political life. But +instead of narrowing the scope of politics, to +avoid it, the only sensible thing to do is to invent +methods which will allow needs and problems +and group interests avenues into politics.</p> + +<p>But a suggestion like this is sure to be met with +the argument which Woodrow Wilson has in +mind when he says that the "questions involved +are social and moral and are not susceptible of +being made parts of a party program." He +voices a common belief when he insists that there +are moral and social problems, "essentially non-political." +Innocent as it looks at first sight this +plea by Woodrow Wilson is weighted with the +tradition of a century and a half. To my mind +it symbolizes a view of the state which we are outgrowing, +and throws into relief the view towards +which we are struggling. Its implications are +well worth tracing, for through them I think we +can come to understand better the method of +Twentieth Century politics.</p> + +<p>It is perfectly true that that government is +best which governs least. It is equally true that +that government is best which provides most. The +first truth belongs to the Eighteenth Century: +the second to the Twentieth. Neither of them +can be neglected in our attitude towards the state. +Without the Jeffersonian distrust of the police we +might easily grow into an impertinent and tyrannous +collectivism: without a vivid sense of the +possibilities of the state we abandon the supreme +instrument of civilization. The two theories need +to be held together, yet clearly distinguished.</p> + +<p>Government has been an exalted policeman: it +was there to guard property and to prevent us +from quarreling too violently. That was about +all it was good for. Yet society found problems +on its hands--problems which Woodrow Wilson +calls moral and social in their nature. Vice and +crime, disease, and grinding poverty forced themselves +on the attention of the community. A +typical example is the way the social evil compelled +the city of Chicago to begin an investigation. +Yet when government was asked to handle +the question it had for wisdom an ancient conception +of itself as a policeman. Its only method +was to forbid, to prosecute, to jail--in short, to +use the taboo. But experience has shown that +the taboo will not solve "moral and social questions"--that +nine times out of ten it aggravates +the disease. Political action becomes a petty, +futile, mean little intrusion when its only method +is prosecution.</p> + +<p>No wonder then that conservatively-minded +men pray that moral and social questions be kept +out of politics; no wonder that more daring souls +begin to hate the whole idea of government and +take to anarchism. So long as the state is conceived +merely as an agent of repression, the less +it interferes with our lives, the better. Much of +the horror of socialism comes from a belief that +by increasing the functions of government its +regulating power over our daily lives will grow +into a tyranny. I share this horror when certain +socialists begin to propound their schemes. There +is a dreadful amount of forcible scrubbing and +arranging and pocketing implied in some socialisms. +There is a wish to have the state use its +position as general employer to become a censor +of morals and arbiter of elegance, like the benevolent +employers of the day who take an impertinent +interest in the private lives of their workers. +Without any doubt socialism has within it the +germs of that great bureaucratic tyranny which +Chesterton and Belloc have named the Servile +State.</p> + +<p>So it is a wise instinct that makes men jealous +of the policeman's power. Far better we may +say that moral and social problems be left to +private solution than that they be subjected to +the clumsy method of the taboo. When Woodrow +Wilson argues that social problems are not +susceptible to treatment in a party program, he +must mean only one thing: that they cannot be +handled by the state as he conceives it. He is +right. His attitude is far better than that of +the Vice Commission: it too had only a policeman's +view of government, but it proceeded to +apply it to problems that are not susceptible to +such treatment. Wilson, at least, knows the limitations +of his philosophy.</p> + +<p>But once you see the state as a provider of +civilizing opportunities, his whole objection collapses. +As soon as government begins to supply +services, it is turning away from the sterile +tyranny of the taboo. The provision of schools, +streets, plumbing, highways, libraries, parks, universities, +medical attention, post-offices, a Panama +Canal, agricultural information, fire protection--is +a use of government totally different from the +ideal of Jefferson. To furnish these opportunities +is to add to the resources of life, and only a doctrinaire +adherence to a misunderstood ideal will +raise any objection to them.</p> + +<p>When an anarchist says that the state must be +abolished he does not mean what he says. What +he wants to abolish is the repressive, not the +productive state. He cannot possibly object to +being furnished with the opportunity of writing +to his comrade three thousand miles away, of +drinking pure water, or taking a walk in the park. +Of course when he finds the post-office opening +his mail, or a law saying that he must drink +nothing but water, he begins to object even to +the services of the government. But that is a +confusion of thought, for these tyrannies are +merely intrusions of the eighteenth century upon +the twentieth. The postmaster is still something +of a policeman.</p> + +<p>Once you realize that moral and social problems +must be treated to fine opportunities, that the +method of the future is to compete with the devil +rather than to curse him; that the furnishing of +civilized environments is the goal of statecraft, +then there is no longer any reason for keeping +social and moral questions out of politics. They +are what politics must deal with essentially, now +that it has found a way. The policeman with +his taboo did make moral and social questions +insusceptible to treatment in party platforms. +He kept the issues of politics narrow and irrelevant, +and just because these really interesting questions +could not be handled, politics was an over-advertised +hubbub. But the vision of the new +statecraft in centering politics upon human interests +becomes a creator of opportunities instead +of a censor of morals, and deserves a fresh and +heightened regard.</p> + +<p>The party platform will grow ever more and +more into a program of services. In the past it +has been an armory of platitudes or a forecast of +punishments. It promised that it would stop this +evil practice, drive out corruption here, and +prosecute this-and-that offense. All that belongs +to a moribund tradition. Abuse and disuse characterize +the older view of the state: guardian +and censor it has been, provider but grudgingly. +The proclamations of so-called progressives that +they will jail financiers, or "wage relentless warfare" +upon social evils, are simply the reiterations +of men who do not understand the uses of +the state.</p> + +<p>A political revolution is in progress: the state +as policeman is giving place to the state as producer.</p> + +<br><br><br> + + +<h2><a name="ch9">CHAPTER IX</a></h2> + +<h3>REVOLUTION AND CULTURE</h3> + +<br> +<p>There is a legend of a peasant who lived +near Paris through the whole Napoleonic +era without ever having heard of the name of +Bonaparte. A story of that kind is enough to +make a man hesitate before he indulges in a flamboyant +description of social changes. That peasant +is more than a symbol of the privacy of human +interest: he is a warning against the incurable romanticism +which clings about the idea of a revolution. +Popular history is deceptive if it is used to +furnish a picture for coming events. Like drama +which compresses the tragedy of a lifetime into a +unity of time, place, and action, history foreshortens +an epoch into an episode. It gains in poignancy, +but loses reality. Men grew from infancy to +old age, their children's children had married and +loved and worked while the social change we +speak of as the industrial revolution was being +consummated. That is why it is so difficult for +living people to believe that they too are in the +midst of great transformations. What looks to +us like an incredible rush of events sloping towards +a great historical crisis was to our ancestors +little else than the occasional punctuation +of daily life with an exciting incident. Even +to-day when we have begun to speak of our age +as a transition, there are millions of people who +live in an undisturbed routine. Even those of +us who regard ourselves as active in mothering +the process and alert in detecting its growth are +by no means constantly aware of any great +change. For even the fondest mother cannot +watch her child grow.</p> + +<p>I remember how tremendously surprised I was +in visiting Russia several years ago to find that +in Moscow or St. Petersburg men were interested +in all sorts of things besides the revolution. I +had expected every Russian to be absorbed in +the struggle. It seemed at first as if my notions +of what a revolution ought to be were contradicted +everywhere. And I assure you it wrenched +the imagination to see tidy nursemaids wheeling +perambulators and children playing diavolo on +the very square where Bloody Sunday had gone +into history. It takes a long perspective and no +very vivid acquaintance with revolution to be +melodramatic about it. So much is left out of +history and biography which would spoil the effect. +The anti-climax is almost always omitted.</p> + +<p>Perhaps that is the reason why Arnold Bennett's +description of the siege of Paris in "The +Old Wives' Tale" is so disconcerting to many +people. It is hard to believe that daily life continues +with its stretches of boredom and its personal +interests even while the enemy is bombarding +a city. How much more difficult is it to +imagine a revolution that is to come--to space it +properly through a long period of time, to conceive +what it will be like to the people who live +through it. Almost all social prediction is catastrophic +and absurdly simplified. Even those who +talk of the slow "evolution" of society are likely +to think of it as a series of definite changes easily +marked and well known to everybody. It is what +Bernard Shaw calls the reformer's habit of mistaking +his private emotions for a public movement.</p> + +<p>Even though the next century is full of dramatic +episodes--the collapse of governments and labor +wars--these events will be to the social revolution +what the smashing of machines in Lancashire +was to the industrial revolution. The reality that +is worthy of attention is a change in the very texture +and quality of millions of lives--a change +that will be vividly perceptible only in the retrospect +of history.</p> + +<p>The conservative often has a sharp sense of the +complexity of revolution: not desiring change, he +prefers to emphasize its difficulties, whereas the +reformer is enticed into a faith that the intensity +of desire is a measure of its social effect. Yet +just because no reform is in itself a revolution, we +must not jump to the assurance that no revolution +can be accomplished. True as it is that great +changes are imperceptible, it is no less true that +they are constantly taking place. Moreover, for +the very reason that human life changes its quality +so slowly, the panic over political proposals is +childish.</p> + +<p>It is obvious, for instance, that the recall of +judges will not revolutionize the national life. +That is why the opposition generated will seem +superstitious to the next generation. As I write, +a convention of the Populist Party has just taken +place. Eight delegates attended the meeting, which +was held in a parlor. Even the reactionary press +speaks in a kindly way about these men. Twenty +years ago the Populists were hated and feared +as if they practiced black magic. What they +wanted is on the point of realization. To some +of us it looks like a drop in the bucket--a slight +part of vastly greater plans. But how stupid was +the fear of Populism, what unimaginative nonsense +it was to suppose twenty years ago that the +program was the road to the end of the world.</p> + +<p>One good deed or one bad one is no measure +of a man's character: the Last Judgment let us +hope will be no series of decisions as simple as +that. "The soul survives its adventures," says +Chesterton with a splendid sense of justice. A +country survives its legislation. That truth should +not comfort the conservative nor depress the radical. +For it means that public policy can enlarge +its scope and increase its audacity, can try big +experiments without trembling too much over the +result. This nation could enter upon the most +radical experiments and could afford to fail in +them. Mistakes do not affect us so deeply as +we imagine. Our prophecies of change are subjective +wishes or fears that never come to full +realization.</p> + +<p>Those socialists are confused who think that +a new era can begin by a general strike or an +electoral victory. Their critics are just a bit +more confused when they become hysterical over +the prospect. Both of them over-emphasize the +importance of single events. Yet I do not wish +to furnish the impression that crises are negligible. +They are extremely important as symptoms, as +milestones, and as instruments. It is simply that +the reality of a revolution is not in a political +decree or the scarehead of a newspaper, but in +the experiences, feelings, habits of myriads of +men.</p> + +<p>No one who watched the textile strike at +Lawrence, Massachusetts, in the winter of 1912 +can forget the astounding effect it had on the +complacency of the public. Very little was revealed +that any well-informed social worker does +not know as a commonplace about the mill population. +The wretchedness and brutality of Lawrence +conditions had been described in books and +magazines and speeches until radicals had begun +to wonder at times whether the power of language +wasn't exhausted. The response was discouragingly +weak--an occasional government investigation, +an impassioned protest from a few +individuals, a placid charity, were about all that +the middle-class public had to say about factory +life. The cynical indifference of legislatures and +the hypocrisy of the dominant parties were all +that politics had to offer. The Lawrence strike +touched the most impervious: story after story +came to our ears of hardened reporters who suddenly +refused to misrepresent the strikers, of +politicians aroused to action, of social workers +become revolutionary. Daily conversation was +shocked into some contact with realities--the +newspapers actually printed facts about the situation +of a working class population.</p> + +<p>And why? The reason is not far to seek. +The Lawrence strikers did something more than +insist upon their wrongs; they showed a disposition +to right them. That is what scared public +opinion into some kind of truth-telling. So long +as the poor are docile in their poverty, the rest +of us are only too willing to satisfy our consciences +by pitying them. But when the downtrodden +gather into a threat as they did at Lawrence, +when they show that they have no stake +in civilization and consequently no respect for its +institutions, when the object of pity becomes the +avenger of its own miseries, then the middle-class +public begins to look at the problem more intelligently.</p> + +<p>We are not civilized enough to meet an issue +before it becomes acute. We were not intelligent +enough to free the slaves peacefully--we are not +intelligent enough to-day to meet the industrial +problem before it develops a crisis. That is the +hard truth of the matter. And that is why no +honest student of politics can plead that social +movements should confine themselves to argument +and debate, abandoning the militancy of the +strike, the insurrection, the strategy of social conflict.</p> + +<p>Those who deplore the use of force in the +labor struggle should ask themselves whether the +ruling classes of a country could be depended +upon to inaugurate a program of reconstruction +which would abolish the barbarism that prevails +in industry. Does anyone seriously believe that +the business leaders, the makers of opinion and +the politicians will, on their own initiative, bring +social questions to a solution? If they do it will +be for the first time in history. The trivial plans +they are introducing to-day--profit-sharing and +welfare work--are on their own admission an +attempt to quiet the unrest and ward off the +menace of socialism.</p> + +<p>No, paternalism is not dependable, granting +that it is desirable. It will do very little more +than it feels compelled to do. Those who to-day +bear the brunt of our evils dare not throw themselves +upon the mercy of their masters, not +though there are bread and circuses as a reward. +From the groups upon whom the pressure is most +direct must come the power to deal with it. We +are not all immediately interested in all problems: +our attention wanders unless the people who are +interested compel us to listen.</p> + +<p>Social movements are at once the symptoms +and the instruments of progress. Ignore them +and statesmanship is irrelevant; fail to use them +and it is weak. Often in the course of these +essays I have quoted from H. G. Wells. I must +do so again: "Every party stands essentially for +the interests and mental usages of some definite +class or group of classes in the exciting community, +and every party has its scientific minded and constructive +leading section, with well defined hinterlands +formulating its social functions in a public +spirited form, and its superficial-minded following +confessing its meannesses and vanities and +prejudices. No class will abolish itself, materially +alter its way of living, or drastically reconstruct +itself, albeit no class is indisposed to +co-operate in the unlimited socialization of any +other class. In that capacity for aggression upon +other classes lies the essential driving force of +modern affairs."</p> + +<p>The truth of this can be tested in the socialist +movement. There is a section among the socialists +which regards the class movement of labor +as a driving force in the socialization of industry. +This group sees clearly that without the threat +of aggression no settlement of the issues is possible. +Ordinarily such socialists say that the class +struggle is a movement which will end classes. +They mean that the self-interest of labor is identical +with the interests of a community--that it +is a kind of social selfishness. But there are +other socialists who speak constantly of "working-class +government" and they mean just what they +say. It is their intention to have the community +ruled in the interests of labor. Probe their minds +to find out what they mean by labor and in all +honesty you cannot escape the admission that they +mean industrial labor alone. These socialists +think entirely in terms of the factory population +of cities: the farmers, the small shop-keepers, the +professional classes have only a perfunctory interest +for them. I know that no end of phrases +could be adduced to show the inclusiveness of the +word labor. But their intention is what I have +tried to describe: they are thinking of government +by a factory population.</p> + +<p>They appeal to history for confirmation: have +not all social changes, they ask, meant the emergence +of a new economic class until it dominated +society? Did not the French Revolution mean +the conquest of the feudal landlord by the middle-class +merchant? Why should not the Social +Revolution mean the victory of the proletariat +over the bourgeoisie? That may be true, but it +is no reason for being bullied by it into a tame +admission that what has always been must always +be. I see no reason for exalting the unconscious +failures of other revolutions into deliberate models +for the next one. Just because the capacity of +aggression in the middle class ran away with +things, and failed to fuse into any decent social +ideal, is not ground for trying as earnestly as +possible to repeat the mistake.</p> + +<p>The lesson of it all, it seems to me, is this: +that class interests are the driving forces which +keep public life centered upon essentials. They +become dangerous to a nation when it denies them, +thwarts them and represses them so long that they +burst out and become dominant. Then there is +no limit to their aggression until another class +appears with contrary interests. The situation +might be compared to those hysterias in which +a suppressed impulse flares up and rules the whole +mental life.</p> + +<p>Social life has nothing whatever to fear from +group interests so long as it doesn't try to play +the ostrich in regard to them. So the burden of +national crises is squarely upon the dominant +classes who fight so foolishly against the emergent +ones. That is what precipitates violence, that is +what renders social co-operation impossible, that +is what makes catastrophes the method of change.</p> + +<p>The wisest rulers see this. They know that the +responsibility for insurrections rests in the last +analysis upon the unimaginative greed and endless +stupidity of the dominant classes. There is +something pathetic in the blindness of powerful +people when they face a social crisis. Fighting +viciously every readjustment which a nation demands, +they make their own overthrow inevitable. +It is they who turn opposing interests into a class +war. Confronted with the deep insurgency of +labor what do capitalists and their spokesmen do? +They resist every demand, submit only after a +struggle, and prepare a condition of war to the +death. When far-sighted men appear in the ruling +classes--men who recognize the need of a +civilized answer to this increasing restlessness, the +rich and the powerful treat them to a scorn and +a hatred that are incredibly bitter. The hostility +against men like Roosevelt, La Follette, Bryan, +Lloyd-George is enough to make an observer believe +that the rich of to-day are as stupid as +the nobles of France before the Revolution.</p> + +<p>It seems to me that Roosevelt never spoke +more wisely or as a better friend of civilization +than the time when he said at New York City +on March 20, 1912, that "the woes of France +for a century and a quarter have been due to the +folly of her people in splitting into the two camps +of unreasonable conservatism and unreasonable +radicalism. Had pre-Revolutionary France listened +to men like Turgot and backed them up +all would have gone well. But the beneficiaries +of privilege, the Bourbon reactionaries, the short-sighted +ultra-conservatives, turned down Turgot; +and then found that instead of him they had +obtained Robespierre. They gained twenty years' +freedom from all restraint and reform at the cost +of the whirlwind of the red terror; and in their +turn the unbridled extremists of the terror induced +a blind reaction; and so, with convulsion +and oscillation from one extreme to another, with +alterations of violent radicalism and violent +Bourbonism, the French people went through +misery to a shattered goal."</p> + +<p>Profound changes are not only necessary, but +highly desirable. Even if this country were comfortably +well-off, healthy, prosperous, and educated, +men would go on inventing and creating +opportunities to amplify the possibilities of life. +These inventions would mean radical transformations. +For we are bent upon establishing more +in this nation than a minimum of comfort. A +liberal people would welcome social inventions as +gladly as we do mechanical ones. What it would +fear is a hard-shell resistance to change which +brings it about explosively.</p> + +<p>Catastrophes are disastrous to radical and conservative +alike: they do not preserve what was +worth maintaining; they allow a deformed and +often monstrous perversion of the original plan. +The emancipation of the slaves might teach us +the lesson that an explosion followed by reconstruction +is satisfactory to nobody.</p> + +<p>Statesmanship would go out to meet a crisis +before it had become acute. The thing it would +emphatically not do is to dam up an insurgent +current until it overflowed the countryside. Fight +labor's demands to the last ditch and there will +come a time when it seizes the whole of power, +makes itself sovereign, and takes what it used +to ask. That is a poor way for a nation to proceed. +For the insurgent become master is a +fanatic from the struggle, and as George Santayana +says, he is only too likely to redouble his +effort after he has forgotten his aim.</p> + +<p>Nobody need waste his time debating whether +or not there are to be great changes. That is +settled for us whether we like it or not. What +is worth debating is the method by which change +is to come about. Our choice, it seems to me, lies +between a blind push and a deliberate leadership, +between thwarting movements until they master +us, and domesticating them until they are answered.</p> + +<p>When Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party +on a platform of social reform he crystallized +a deep unrest, brought it out of the cellars of +resentment into the agora of political discussion. +He performed the real task of a leader--a task +which has essentially two dimensions. By becoming +part of the dynamics of unrest he gathered +a power of effectiveness: by formulating a program +for insurgency he translated it into terms of +public service.</p> + +<p>What Roosevelt did at the middle-class level, +the socialists have done at the proletarian. The +world has been slow to recognize the work of +the Socialist Party in transmuting a dumb muttering +into a civilized program. It has found an +intelligent outlet for forces that would otherwise +be purely cataclysmic. The truth of this has +been tested recently in the appearance of the +"direct actionists."</p> + +<p>They are men who have lost faith in political +socialism. Why? Because, like all other groups, +the socialists tend to become routineers, to slip +into an easy reiteration. The direct actionists +are a warning to the Socialist Party that its tactics +and its program are not adequate to domesticating +the deepest unrest of labor. Within that party, +therefore, a leadership is required which will ride +the forces of "syndicalism" and use them for a +constructive purpose. The brilliant writer of the +"Notes of the Week" in the English New Age +has shown how this might be done. He has +fused the insight of the syndicalist with the plans +of the collectivists under the name of Guild +Socialism.</p> + +<p>His plan calls for co-management of industry +by the state and the labor union. It steers a +course between exploitation by a bureaucracy in +the interests of the consumer--the socialist danger--and +oppressive monopolies by industrial +unions--the syndicalist danger. I shall not attempt +to argue here either for or against the +scheme. My concern is with method rather than +with special pleadings. The Guild Socialism of +the "New Age" is merely an instance of statesmanlike +dealing with a new social force. Instead +of throwing up its hands in horror at one over-advertised +tactical incident like sabotage, the +"New Age" went straight to the creative impulse +of the syndicalist movement.</p> + +<p>Every true craftsman, artist or professional +man knows and sympathizes with that impulse: +you may call it a desire for self-direction in labor. +The deepest revolt implied in the term syndicalism +is against the impersonal, driven quality +of modern industry--against the destruction of +that pride which alone distinguishes work from +slavery. Some such impulse as that is what marks +off syndicalism from the other revolts of labor. +Our suspicion of the collectivist arrangement is +aroused by the picture of a vast state machine so +horribly well-regulated that human impulse is utterly +subordinated. I believe too that the fighting +qualities of syndicalism are kept at the boiling +point by a greater sense of outraged human +dignity than can be found among mere socialists +or unionists. The imagination is more vivid: +the horror of capitalism is not alone in the poverty +and suffering it entails, but in its ruthless denial +of life to millions of men. The most cruel of +all denials is to deprive a human being of joyous +activity. Syndicalism is shot through with the +assertion that an imposed drudgery is intolerable--that +labor at a subsistence wage as a cog in a +meaningless machine is no condition upon which +to found civilization. That is a new kind of +revolt--more dangerous to capitalism than the +demand for higher wages. You can not treat +the syndicalists like cattle because forsooth they +have ceased to be cattle. "The damned wantlessness +of the poor," about which Oscar Wilde complained, +the cry for a little more fodder, gives +way to an insistence upon the chance to be interested +in life.</p> + +<p>To shut the door in the face of such a current +of feeling because it is occasionally exasperated +into violence would be as futile as locking up +children because they get into mischief. The +mind which rejects syndicalism entirely because +of the by-products of its despair has had pearls +cast before it in vain. I know that syndicalism +means a revision of some of our plans--that it +is an intrusion upon many a glib prejudice. But +a human impulse is more important than any existing +theory. We must not throw an unexpected +guest out of the window because no place +is set for him at table. For we lose not only +the charm of his company: he may in anger +wreck the house.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>Yet the whole nation can't sit at one table: the +politician will object that all human interests can't +be embodied in a party program. That is true, +truer than most politicians would admit in public. +No party can represent a whole nation, although, +with the exception of the socialists, all of them +pretend to do just that. The reason is very +simple: a platform is a list of performances that +are possible within a few years. It is concerned +with more or less immediate proposals, and in +a nation split up by class, sectional and racial +interests, these proposals are sure to arouse hostility. +No definite industrial and political platform, +for example, can satisfy rich and poor, +black and white, Eastern creditor and Western +farmer. A party that tried to answer every conflicting +interest would stand still because people +were pulling in so many different directions. It +would arouse the anger of every group and the +approval of its framers. It would have no +dynamic power because the forces would neutralize +each other.</p> + +<p>One comprehensive party platform fusing every +interest is impossible and undesirable. What is +both possible and desirable is that every group +interest should be represented in public life--that +it should have spokesmen and influence in +public affairs. This is almost impossible to-day. +Our blundering political system is pachydermic in +its irresponsiveness. The methods of securing +representation are unfit instruments for any flexible +use. But the United States is evidently not +exceptional in this respect. England seems to +suffer in the same way. In May, 1912, the +"Daily Mail" published a series of articles by +H. G. Wells on "The Labour Unrest." Is he +not describing almost any session of Congress +when he says that "to go into the House of +Commons is to go aside out of the general stream +of the community's vitality into a corner where +little is learnt and much is concocted, into a +specialized Assembly which is at once inattentive +to and monstrously influential in our affairs?" +Further on Wells remarks that "this diminishing +actuality of our political life is a matter of almost +universal comment to-day.... In Great +Britain we do not have Elections any more; we +have Rejections. What really happens at a +general election is that the party organizations--obscure +and secretive conclaves with entirely +mysterious funds--appoint about 1200 men to be +our rulers, and all that we, we so-called self-governing +people, are permitted to do is, in a +muddled angry way, to strike off the names of +about half these selected gentlemen."</p> + +<p>A cynic might say that the people can't go far +wrong in politics because they can't be very right. +Our so-called representative system is unrepresentative +in a deeper way than the reformers who +talk about the money power imagine. It is empty +and thin: a stifling of living currents in the interest +of a mediocre regularity.</p> + +<p>But suppose that politics were made responsive--suppose +that the forces of the community found +avenues of expression into public life. Would +not our legislatures be cut up into antagonistic +parties, would not the conflicts of the nation be +concentrated into one heated hall? If you really +represented the country in its government, would +you not get its partisanship in a quintessential +form? After all group interests in the nation +are diluted by space and time: the mere separation +in cities and country prevents them from +falling into the psychology of the crowd. But +let them all be represented in one room by men +who are professionally interested in their constituency's +prejudices and what would you accomplish +but a deepening of the cleavages? Would +the session not become an interminable wrangle?</p> + +<p>Nobody can answer these questions with any +certainty. Most prophecies are simply the masquerades +of prejudice, and the people who love +stability and prefer to let their own well-being +alone will see in a sensitive political system little +but an invitation to chaos. They will choose +facts to adorn their fears. History can be all +things to all men: nothing is easier than to summon +the Terror, the Commune, lynchings in the +Southern States, as witnesses to the excesses and +hysterias of the mob. Those facts will prove the +case conclusively to anyone who has already made +up his mind on the subject. Absolute democrats +can also line up their witnesses: the conservatism +of the Swiss, Wisconsin's successful experiments, +the patience and judgment of the Danes. Both +sides are remarkably sure that the right is with +them, whereas the only truth about which an +observer can be entirely certain is that in some +places and in certain instances democracy is admittedly +successful.</p> + +<p>There is no absolute case one way or the other. +It would be silly from the experience we have +to make a simple judgment about the value of +direct expression. You cannot lump such a mass +of events together and come to a single conclusion +about them. It is a crude habit of mind that +would attempt it. You might as well talk abstractly +about the goodness or badness of this +universe which contains happiness, pain, exhilaration +and indifference in a thousand varying grades +and quantities. There is no such thing as Democracy; +there are a number of more or less democratic +experiments which are not subject to wholesale +eulogy or condemnation.</p> + +<p>The questions about the success of a truly representative +system are pseudo-questions. And +for this reason: success is not due to the system; +it does not flow from it automatically. The +source of success is in the people who use the +system: as an instrument it may help or hinder +them, but they must operate it. Government is +not a machine running on straight tracks to a +desired goal. It is a human work which may be +facilitated by good tools.</p> + +<p>That is why the achievements of the Swiss +may mean nothing whatever when you come to +prophesy about the people of New York. Because +Wisconsin has made good use of the direct +primary it does not follow that it will benefit the +Filipino. It always seems curious to watch the +satisfaction of some reform magazines when +China or Turkey or Persia imitates the constitutional +forms of Western democracies. Such +enthusiasts postulate a uniformity of human ability +which every fact of life contradicts.</p> + +<p>Present-day reform lays a great emphasis upon +instruments and very little on the skilful use of +them. It says that human nature is all right, +that what is wrong is the "system." Now the +effect of this has been to concentrate attention +on institutions and to slight men. A small step +further, institutions become an end in themselves. +They may violate human nature as the taboo +does. That does not disturb the interest in them +very much, for by common consent reformers are +to fix their minds upon the "system."</p> + +<p>A machine should be run by men for human +uses. The preoccupation with the "system" lays +altogether too little stress on the men who operate +it and the men for whom it is run. It is as if +you put all your effort into the working of a +plough and forgot the farmer and the consumer. +I state the case baldly and contradiction would +be easy. The reformer might point to phrases +like "human welfare" which appear in his writings. +And yet the point stands, I believe. The +emphasis which directs his thinking bears most +heavily upon the mechanics of life--only perfunctorily +upon the ability of the men who are to +use them.</p> + +<p>Even an able reformer like Mr. Frederic C. +Howe does not escape entirely. A recent book is +devoted to a glowing eulogy of "Wisconsin, an +Experiment in Democracy." In a concluding +chapter Mr. Howe states the philosophy of the +experiment. "What is the explanation of Wisconsin?" +he asks. "Why has it been able to +eliminate corruption, machine politics, and rid itself +of the boss? What is the cause of the efficiency, +the thoroughness, the desire to serve which +animate the state? Why has Wisconsin succeeded +where other states have uniformly failed? +I think the explanation is simple. It is also perfectly +natural. It is traceable to democracy, to +the political freedom which had its beginning in +the direct primary law, and which has been continuously +strengthened by later laws"; some pages +later, "Wisconsin assumed that the trouble with +our politics is not with our people, but with the +machinery with which the people work.... +It has established a line of vision as direct as +possible between the people and the expression +of their will." The impression Mr. Howe evidently +wishes to leave with his readers is that +the success of the experiment is due to the instruments +rather than to the talent of the people of +Wisconsin. That would be a valuable and comforting +assurance to propagandists, for it means +that other states with the same instruments can +achieve the same success. But the conclusion +seems to me utterly unfounded. The reasoning +is perilously like that of the gifted lady amateur +who expects to achieve greatness by imitating +the paint box and palette, oils and canvases of an +artist.</p> + +<p>Mr. Howe's own book undermines his conclusions. +He begins with an account of La +Follette--of a man with initiative and a constructive +bent. The forces La Follette set in +motion are commented upon. The work of Van +Hise is shown. What Wisconsin had was leadership +and a people that responded, inventors, and +constructive minds. They forged the direct +primary and the State University out of the impetus +within themselves. No doubt they were +fortunate in their choice of instruments. They +made the expression of the people's will direct, +yet that will surely is the more primary thing. +It makes and uses representative systems: but you +cannot reverse the process. A man can manufacture +a plough and operate it, but no amount +of ploughs will create a man and endow him +with skill.</p> + +<p>All sorts of observers have pointed out that +the Western States adopt reform legislation more +quickly than the Eastern. Yet no one would +seriously maintain that the West is more progressive +because it has progressive laws. The laws +are a symptom and an aid but certainly not the +cause. Constitutions do not make people; people +make constitutions. So the task of reform consists +not in presenting a state with progressive +laws, but in getting the people to want them.</p> + +<p>The practical difference is extraordinary. I +insist upon it so much because the tendency of +political discussion is to regard government as +automatic: a device that is sure to fail or sure +to succeed. It is sure of nothing. Effort moves +it, intelligence directs it; its fate is in human +hands.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>The politics I have urged in these chapters +cannot be learned by rote. What can be taught +by rule of thumb is the administration of precedents. +That is at once the easiest and the most +fruitless form of public activity. Only a low +degree of intelligence is required and of effort +merely a persistent repetition. Men fall into a +routine when they are tired and slack: it has all +the appearance of activity with few of its burdens. +It was a profound observation when Bernard +Shaw said that men dread liberty because of the +bewildering responsibility it imposes and the uncommon +alertness it demands. To do what has +always been done, to think in well-cut channels, +to give up "the intolerable disease of thought," +is an almost constant demand of our natures. +That is perhaps why so many of the romantic +rebels of the Nineteenth Century sank at last +into the comforting arms of Mother Church. +That is perhaps the reason why most oldish men +acquire information, but learn very little. The +conservative who loves his routine is in nine cases +out of ten a creature too lazy to change its habits.</p> + +<p>Confronted with a novelty, the first impulse +is to snub it, and send it into exile. When it +becomes too persistent to be ignored a taboo is +erected and threats of fines and condign punishment +are made if it doesn't cease to appear. This +is the level of culture at which Sherman Anti-Trust +acts are passed, brothels are raided, and +labor agitators are thrown into jail. If the taboo +is effective it drives the evil under cover, where +it festers and emits a slow poison. This is the +price we pay for the appearance of suppression. +But if the problem is more heavily charged with +power, the taboo irritates the force until it explodes. +Not infrequently what was once simply +a factor of life becomes the dominating part of +it. At this point the whole routineer scheme of +things collapses, there is a period of convulsion +and Cæsarean births, and men weary of excitement +sink back into a newer routine. Thus the +cycle of futility is completed.</p> + +<p>The process bears as much resemblance to +statecraft as sitting backward on a runaway horse +does to horsemanship. The ordinary politician +has no real control, no direction, no insight into +the power he rides. What he has is an elevated, +though temporary seat. Real statesmanship has +a different ambition. It begins by accepting +human nature. No routine has ever done that in +spite of the conservative patter about "human +nature"; mechanical politics has usually begun by +ignoring and ended by violating the nature of +men.</p> + +<p>To accept that nature does not mean that we +accept its present character. It is probably true +that the impulses of men have changed very little +within recorded history. What has changed enormously +from epoch to epoch is the character +in which these impulses appear. The impulses +that at one period work themselves out +into cruelty and lust may at another produce the +richest values of civilized life. The statesman +can affect that choice. His business is to provide +fine opportunities for the expression of human +impulses--to surround childhood, youth and age +with homes and schools, cities and countryside +that shall be stocked with interest and the chance +for generous activity.</p> + +<p>Government can play a leading part in this +work, for with the decadence of the church it +has become the only truly catholic organization +in the land. Its task is essentially to carry out +programs of service, to add and build and increase +the facilities of life. Repression is an insignificant +part of its work; the use of the club can +never be applauded, though it may be tolerated +<i>faute de mieux</i>. Its use is a confession of ignorance.</p> + +<p>A sensitively representative machinery will +probably serve such statesmanship best. For the +easy expression of public opinion in government +is a clue to what services are needed and a test +of their success. It keeps the processes of politics +well ventilated and reminds politicians of their +excuse for existence.</p> + +<p>In that kind of statesmanship there will be a +premium on inventiveness, on the ingenuity to +devise and plan. There will be much less use for +lawyers and a great deal more for scientists. The +work requires industrial organizers, engineers, +architects, educators, sanitists to achieve what +leadership brings into the program of politics.</p> + +<p>This leadership is the distinctive fact about +politics. The statesman acts in part as an intermediary +between the experts and his constituency. +He makes social movements conscious of themselves, +expresses their needs, gathers their power +and then thrusts them behind the inventor and +the technician in the task of actual achievement. +What Roosevelt did in the conservation movement +was typical of the statesman's work. He +recognized the need of attention to natural resources, +made it public, crystallized its force and +delegated the technical accomplishment to Pinchot +and his subordinates.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>But creative statesmanship requires a culture to +support it. It can neither be taught by rule nor +produced out of a vacuum. A community that +clatters along with its rusty habits of thought +unquestioned, making no distinction between instruments +and idols, with a dull consumption of +machine-made romantic fiction, no criticism, an +empty pulpit and an unreliable press, will find +itself faithfully mirrored in public affairs. The +one thing that no democrat may assume is that +the people are dear good souls, fully competent +for their task. The most valuable leaders never +assume that. No one, for example, would accuse +Karl Marx of disloyalty to workingmen. Yet in +1850 he could write at the demagogues among his +friends: "While we draw the attention of the +German workman to the <i>undeveloped state</i> of the +proletariat in Germany, you flatter the national +spirit and the guild prejudices of the German +artisans in the grossest manner, a method of procedure +without doubt the more popular of the +two. Just as the democrats made a sort of fetich +of the words, 'the people,' so you make one of +the word 'proletariat.'" John Spargo quotes this +statement in his "Life." Marx, we are told, +could use phrases like "democratic miasma." He +never seems to have made the mistake of confusing +democracy with demolatry. Spargo is perfectly +clear about this characteristic of Marx: +"He admired most of all, perhaps, that fine devotion +to truth as he understood it, and disregard +of popularity which marked Owen's life. Contempt +for popular opinion was one of his most +strongly developed characteristics. He was fond, +says Liebknecht, of quoting as his motto the defiant +line of Dante, with which he afterwards concluded +his preface to 'Das Kapital':</p> + +<p>'Segui il tuo corso e lascia dir le genti.'"</p> + +<p>It is to Marx's everlasting credit that he set +the intellectual standard of socialism on the most +vigorous intellectual basis he could find. He knew +better than to be satisfied with loose thinking +and fairly good intentions. He knew that the +vast change he contemplated needed every ounce +of intellectual power that the world possessed. +A fine boast it was that socialism was equipped +with all the culture of the age. I wonder what +he would have thought of an enthusiastic socialist +candidate for Governor of New York who could +write that "until men are free the world has no +need of any more literary efforts, of any more +paintings, of any more poems. It is better to +have said one word for the emancipation of the +race than to have written the greatest novel of +the times.... The world doesn't need any +more literature."</p> + +<p>I will not venture a guess as to what Marx +would have said, but I know what we must say: +"Without a literature the people is dumb, without +novels and poems, plays and criticism, without +books of philosophy, there is neither the intelligence +to plan, the imagination to conceive, nor the +understanding of a common purpose. Without +culture you can knock down governments, overturn +property relations, you can create excitement, +but you cannot create a genuine revolution in the +lives of men." The reply of the workingmen in +1847 to Cabet's proposal that they found Icaria, +"a new terrestrial Paradise," in Texas if you +please, contains this interesting objection: "Because +although those comrades who intend to +emigrate with Cabet may be eager Communists, +yet they still possess too many of the faults and +prejudices of present-day society by reason of +their past education to be able to get rid of them +at once by joining Icaria."</p> + +<p>That simple statement might be taken to heart +by all the reformers and socialists who insist +that the people are all right, that only institutions +are wrong. The politics of reconstruction require +a nation vastly better educated, a nation freed +from its slovenly ways of thinking, stimulated by +wider interests, and jacked up constantly by the +sharpest kind of criticism. It is puerile to say +that institutions must be changed from top to +bottom and then assume that their victims are +prepared to make the change. No amount of +charters, direct primaries, or short ballots +make a democracy out of an illiterate people. +Those portions of America where there are voting +booths but no schools cannot possibly be described +as democracies. Nor can the person who +reads one corrupt newspaper and then goes out +to vote make any claim to having registered his +will. He may have a will, but he has not used it.</p> + +<p>For politics whose only ideal is the routine, it +is just as well that men shouldn't know what they +want or how to express it. Education has always +been a considerable nuisance to the conservative +intellect. In the Southern States, culture among +the negroes is openly deplored, and I do not blame +any patriarch for dreading the education of +women. It is out of culture that the substance of +real revolutions is made. If by some magic force +you could grant women the vote and then keep +them from schools and colleges, newspapers and +lectures, the suffrage would be no more effective +than a Blue Law against kissing your wife on Sunday. +It is democratic machinery with an educated +citizenship behind it that embodies all the fears +of the conservative and the hopes of the radical.</p> + +<p>Culture is the name for what people are interested +in, their thoughts, their models, the books +they read and the speeches they hear, their table-talk, +gossip, controversies, historical sense and +scientific training, the values they appreciate, the +quality of life they admire. All communities have +a culture. It is the climate of their civilization. +Without a favorable culture political schemes are +a mere imposition. They will not work without +a people to work them.</p> + +<p>The real preparation for a creative statesmanship +lies deeper than parties and legislatures. +It is the work of publicists and educators, scientists, +preachers and artists. Through all the +agents that make and popularize thought must +come a bent of mind interested in invention and +freed from the authority of ideas. The democratic +culture must, with critical persistence, make +man the measure of all things. I have tried again +and again to point out the iconoclasm that is constantly +necessary to avoid the distraction that +comes of idolizing our own methods of thought. +Without an unrelaxing effort to center the mind +upon human uses, human purposes, and human +results, it drops into idolatry and becomes hostile +to creation.</p> + +<p>The democratic experiment is the only one that +requires this wilful humanistic culture. An absolutism +like Russia's is served better when the +people accept their ideas as authoritative and +piously sacrifice humanity to a non-human purpose. +An aristocracy flourishes where the people +find a vicarious enjoyment in admiring the +successes of the ruling class. That prevents +men from developing their own interests and +looking for their own successes. No doubt +Napoleon was well content with the philosophy +of those guardsmen who drank his health before +he executed them.</p> + +<p>But those excellent soldiers would make dismal +citizens. A view of life in which man obediently +allows himself to be made grist for somebody +else's mill is the poorest kind of preparation for +the work of self-government. You cannot long +deny external authorities in government and hold +to them for the rest of life, and it is no accident +that the nineteenth century questioned a great deal +more than the sovereignty of kings. The revolt +went deeper and democracy in politics was only +an aspect of it. The age might be compared +to those years of a boy's life when he becomes +an atheist and quarrels with his family. The +nineteenth century was a bad time not only for +kings, but for priests, the classics, parental autocrats, +indissoluble marriage, Shakespeare, the +Aristotelian Poetics and the validity of logic. If +disobedience is man's original virtue, as Oscar +Wilde suggested, it was an extraordinarily virtuous +century. Not a little of the revolt was an +exuberant rebellion for its own sake. There were +also counter-revolutions, deliberate returns to +orthodoxy, as in the case of Chesterton. The +transvaluation of values was performed by many +hands into all sorts of combinations.</p> + +<p>There have been other periods of revolution. +Heresy is just a few hours younger than orthodoxy. +Disobedience is certainly not the discovery +of the nineteenth century. But the quality of it +is. I believe Chesterton has hold of an essential +truth when he says that this is the first time men +have boasted of their heresy. The older rebels +claimed to be more orthodox than the Church, +to have gone back to the true authorities. The +radicals of recent times proclaim that there is no +orthodoxy, no doctrine that men must accept without +question.</p> + +<p>Without doubt they deceive themselves mightily. +They have their invisible popes, called Art, +Nature, Science, with regalia and ritual and a +catechism. But they don't mean to have them. +They mean to be self-governing in their spiritual +lives. And this intention is the half-perceived +current which runs through our age and galvanizes +so many queer revolts. It would be interesting +to trace out the forms it has taken, the abortive +cults it has tried and abandoned. In another +connection I pointed to autonomy as the hope of +syndicalism. It would not be difficult to find a +similar assertion in the feminist agitation. From +Mrs. Gilman's profound objections against a +"man-made" world to the lady who would like to +vote about her taxes, there is a feeling that woman +must be something more than a passive creature. +Walter Pater might be quoted in his conclusion +to the effect that "the theory or idea or system +which requires of us the sacrifice of any part of +experience, in consideration of some interest into +which we cannot enter, or some abstract theory +we have not identified with ourselves, or what +is only conventional, has no real claim upon us." +The desire for self-direction has made a thousand +philosophies as contradictory as the temperaments +of the thinkers. A storehouse of illustration +is at hand: Nietzsche advising the creative +man to bite off the head of the serpent which +is choking him and become "a transfigured being, +a light-surrounded being, that <i>laughed</i>!" One +might point to Stirner's absolute individualism or +turn to Whitman's wholehearted acceptance of +every man with his catalogue of defects and virtues. +Some of these men have cursed each other +roundly: Georges Sorel, for example, who urges +workingmen to accept none of the bourgeois +morality, and becomes most eloquent when he +attacks other revolutionists.</p> + +<p>I do not wish to suggest too much unanimity in +the hundreds of artists and thinkers that are +making the thought of our times. There is a +kind of "professional reconciler" of opposites +who likes to lump all the prominent rebels together +and refer to them affectionately as "us +radicals." Yet that there is a common impulse +in modern thought which strives towards autonomy +is true and worth remarking. In some +men it is half-conscious, in others a minor influence, +but almost no one of weight escapes the +contagion of it entirely. It is a new culture that +is being prepared. Without it there would to-day +be no demand for a creative statesmanship +which turns its back upon the routine and the +taboo, kings and idols, and non-human purposes. +It does more. It is making the atmosphere in +which a humanly centered politics can flourish. +The fact that this culture is multiform and often +contradictory is a sign that more and more of +the interests of life are finding expression. We +should rejoice at that, for profusion means fertility; +where a dead uniformity ceases, invention +and ingenuity flourish.</p> + +<p>Perhaps the insistence on the need of a culture +in statecraft will seem to many people an old-fashioned +delusion. Among the more rigid +socialists and reformers it is not customary to +spend much time discussing mental habits. That, +they think, was made unnecessary by the discovery +of an economic basis of civilization. The +destinies of society are felt to be too solidly set +in industrial conditions to allow any cultural direction. +Where there is no choice, of what importance +is opinion?</p> + +<p>All propaganda is, of course, a practical tribute +to the value of culture. However inevitable the +process may seem, all socialists agree that its inevitability +should be fully realized. They teach +at one time that men act from class interests: +but they devote an enormous amount of energy +to making men conscious of their class. It evidently +matters to that supposedly inevitable +progress whether men are aware of it. In short, +the most hardened socialist admits choice and +deliberation, culture and ideals into his working +faith. He may talk as if there were an iron +determinism, but his practice is better than his +preachment.</p> + +<p>Yet there are necessities in social life. To all +the purposes of politics it is settled, for instance, +that the trust will never be "unscrambled" into +small competing businesses. We say in our argument +that a return to the days of the stage-coach +is impossible or that "you cannot turn back the +hands of the clock." Now man might return to +the stage-coach if that seemed to him the supreme +goal of all his effort, just as anyone can follow +Chesterton's advice to turn back the hands of +the clock if he pleases. But nobody can recover +his yesterdays no matter how much he abuses the +clock, and no man can expunge the memory of +railroads though all the stations and engines were +dismantled.</p> + +<p>"From this survival of the past," says Bergson, +"it follows that consciousness cannot go through +the same state twice." This is the real necessity +that makes any return to the imagined glories of +other days an idle dream. Graham Wallas remarks +that those who have eaten of the tree of +knowledge cannot forget--"Mr. Chesterton cries +out, like the Cyclops in the play, against those +who complicate the life of man, and tells us to +eat 'caviare on impulse,' instead of 'grapenuts on +principle.' But since we cannot unlearn our +knowledge, Mr. Chesterton is only telling us to +eat caviare on principle." The binding fact we +must face in all our calculations, and so in politics +too, is that you cannot recover what is passed. +That is why educated people are not to be pressed +into the customs of their ignorance, why women +who have reached out for more than "Kirche, +Kinder und Küche" can never again be entirely +domestic and private in their lives. Once people +have questioned an authority their faith has lost +its naïveté. Once men have tasted inventions +like the trust they have learned something which +cannot be annihilated. I know of one reformer +who devotes a good deal of his time to intimate +talks with powerful conservatives. He explains +them to themselves: never after do they exercise +their power with the same unquestioning ruthlessness.</p> + +<p>Life is an irreversible process and for that +reason its future can never be a repetition of the +past. This insight we owe to Bergson. The application +of it to politics is not difficult because +politics is one of the interests of life. We can +learn from him in what sense we are bound. +"The finished portrait is explained by the features +of the model, by the nature of the artist, by +colors spread out on the palette; but even with +the knowledge of what explains it, no one, not +even the artist, could have foreseen exactly what +the portrait would be, for to predict it would +have been to produce it before it was produced...." +The future is explained by the +economic and social institutions which were present +at its birth: the trust and the labor union, all +the "movements" and institutions, will condition +it. "Just as the talent of the painter is formed +or deformed--in any case, is modified--under +the very influence of the work he produces, so +each of our states, at the moment of its issue, +modifies our personality, being indeed the new +form we are just assuming. It is then right to +say that what we do depends on what we are; +but it is necessary to add also, that we are, to +a certain extent, what we do, and that we are +creating ourselves continually."</p> + +<p>What I have called culture enters into political +life as a very powerful condition. It is a way +of creating ourselves. Make a blind struggle +luminous, drag an unconscious impulse into the +open day, see that men are aware of their necessities, +and the future is in a measure controlled. +The culture of to-day is for the future an historical +condition. That is its political importance. +The mental habits we are forming, our philosophies +and magazines, theaters, debates, schools, +pulpits and newspapers become part of an active +past which as Bergson says "follows us at every +instant; all that we have felt, thought, and willed +from our earliest infancy is there, leaning over +the present which is about to join it, pressing +against the portals of consciousness that would +fain leave it outside."</p> + +<p>Socialists claim that because the McNamara +brothers had no "class-consciousness," because +they were without a philosophy of society and an +understanding of the labor movement their sense +of wrong was bound to seek out dynamite. That +is a profound truth backed by abundant evidence. +If you turn, for example, to Spargo's Life of +Karl Marx you see that all through his career +Marx struggled with the mere insurrectionists. +It was the men without the Marxian vision of +growth and discipline who were forever trying +to lead little marauding bands against the governments +of Europe. The fact is worth pondering: +the Marxian socialists, openly declaring that all +authority is a temporary manifestation of social +conditions, have waged what we must call a war +of culture against the powers of the world. They +have tried to arouse in workingmen the consciousness +of an historical mission--the patience of that +labor is one of the wonders of the age. But the +McNamaras had a culture that could help them +not at all. They were Catholics, Democrats and +old-fashioned trade-unionists. Religion told them +that authority was absolute and eternal, politics +that Jefferson had said about all there was to say, +economics insisted that the struggle between labor +and capital was an everlasting see-saw. But life +told them that society was brutal: an episode like +the shirtwaist factory fire drove them to blasphemy +and dynamite.</p> + +<p>Those bombs at Los Angeles, assassination and +terrorism, are compounded of courage, indignation +and ignorance. Civilization has much to fear +from the blind class antagonisms it fosters; but +the preaching of "class consciousness," far from +being a fomenter of violence, must be recognized +as the civilizing influence of culture upon economic +interests.</p> + +<p>Thoughts and feelings count. We live in a +revolutionary period and nothing is so important +as to be aware of it. The measure of our self-consciousness +will more or less determine whether +we are to be the victims or the masters of change. +Without philosophy we stumble along. The old +routines and the old taboos are breaking up anyway, +social forces are emerging which seek autonomy +and struggle against slavery to non-human +purposes. We seem to be moving towards some +such statecraft as I have tried to suggest. But +without knowledge of it that progress will be +checkered and perhaps futile. The dynamics for +a splendid human civilization are all about us. +They need to be used. For that there must be +a culture practiced in seeking the inwardness of +impulses, competent to ward off the idols of its +own thought, hospitable to novelty and sufficiently +inventive to harness power.</p> + +<p>Why this age should have come to be what it +is, why at this particular time the whole drift of +thought should be from authority to autonomy +would be an interesting speculation. It is one of +the ultimate questions of politics. It is like asking +why Athens in the Fifth Century B. C. was +singled out as the luminous point of the Western +World. We do not know enough to cut under +such mysteries. We can only begin to guess why +there was a Renaissance, why in certain centuries +man seems extraordinarily creative. Perhaps the +Modern Period with its flexibility, sense of change, +and desire for self-direction is a liberation due to +the great surplus of wealth. Perhaps the ease +of travel, the popularizing of knowledge, the +break-down of frontiers have given us a new interest +in human life by showing how temporary +are all its instruments. Certainly placid or morose +acceptance is undermined. If men remain slaves +either to ideas or to other men, it will be because +they do not know they are slaves. Their intention +is to be free. Their desire is for a full and expressive +life and they do not relish a lop-sided +and lamed humanity. For the age is rich with +varied and generous passions.</p> + +<br> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<hr class="full" noshade> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A PREFACE TO POLITICS***</p> +<p>******* This file should be named 20125-h.txt or 20125-h.zip *******</p> +<p>This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br /> +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/0/1/2/20125">http://www.gutenberg.org/2/0/1/2/20125</a></p> +<p>Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed.</p> + +<p>Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution.</p> + + + +<pre> +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license">http://www.gutenberg.org/license)</a>. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org">http://www.gutenberg.org</a> + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/">http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/</a> + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: +<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL">http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL</a> + +*** END: FULL LICENSE *** +</pre> +</body> +</html> |